HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-12/06/1977 274
December 6, 1977
A regular meeting of the Board of Town Trustees was held at
7:30 p.m. , Tuesday, December 6, 1977 at the Town Hall, Main Road,
Southold. Present were:
Alvah B. Goldsmith, Chairman
Douglas Robertson, Trustee
Philip G. Horton, Trustee
Joseph Hataier, Trustee
Paul Stoutenburgh, Trustee-elect
Scott Harris, Trustee-elect
John Nickles, Trustee-elect
Stephen Katz, L'. I. ' Traveler-Watchman
Frances Wegoner, Suffolk Times
Howard Petersen. application for pilings to moor transient type
vessels at Mattituck Creek off private property of the applicant.
The pilings are installed with permits from the New York State
Dept. of Environmental Conservation and U. S. Army Corps of.
Engineers but no permit from the Board of Southold Town Trustees.
Judge Martin Suter spoke in objection to granting the permit in
his capacity as an individual member of the Southold Town Board.
He stated that' the Town Board has been involved in the removal of
several derelicts over the past five years which cost the tax-
payers thousands. of dollars. Some of the spiles are 25 to 50
feet off the 'highwater mark: There is a marrow channel and the ,
federal and county governments have spent a lot of money to open
it up. There are three derelicts which are being called transient
vessels. . The problem comes when these vessels are no -longer
afloat. Once 'they slide into the channel, it is very expensive
to remove them. ,. There is one boat moored and the secorid is out-
side of that. The commercial fishermen find it very difficult
to get in and out at low tide. Justice Suter said it was his
understanding- that- Mr. Petersen. has been reported to the Army
Corps of Engineers.: -He stated that 'although -Mr. Petersen has
the permits. from the DEC and the Army Corps of Engineers, he still
does not have 'the permit- from the Board 'of Town Trustees.
Anthony ,DeMaula, a' commercial' fisherman, voiced his objection.
He said there are two� 30 foot wide vessels moored side by side.
If two boats tr'ied 'to pass in the channel, one would be aground
on 'the east side. He said that it is necessary to pump out these
boats to keep them afloat.
Henry Drum spoke as a representative of the Mattituck Chamber
of Commerce and as an individual as to his concern about the area.
He feels- it:'is a great hazard to navigation.
Jimmy King objected and voiced his concern that the barge will
sinkrand cover the channel.
Mr. Goldsmith 'said th.e board will contact Mr. Almodovar of' the
Army Corps of Engineers and arrange a meeting with him and any
other people concerned.
275
On motion made by Mr. Hataier, seconded by. Mr. Robertson, it was
RESOLVED to deny the application of .Howard Petersen to place
pilings in Mattituck Creek off private property of the applicant
to moor transient type vessels and to restrict the mooring of
vessels in that area and take further action, if necessary.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Goldsmith, Robertson, Horton, Hataier
The application of Salvatore Cucinotta to place dock, ramp and
float at Little Creek off private property of the applicant was
tabled. A meeting is to be requested with Mr. Carrig, the contractor,
and the owner of the property to determine the question' of the
necessity of the angle of the dock.
Leander B. - Glover, Jr. request for a quitclaim deed to land
adjoining land of the applicant which was filled with dredge spoil
by the County of Suffolk. The following letter under date of
December 2-, 1977 to the Board of Town Trustees was read:
Dear Trustees :
This firm represents the Fleet' s Neck Property Owners Association,
Inc. which has been involved in litigation with Leander Glover, Jr.
over the ownership of certain land located' at' Fleet' s" Neck,
Cutchogue,. New York.
It is my understanding that Mr. Glover has applied ' to the Board of
Trustees for a quitclaim deed to property abutting the' property
involved in the litigation.. I request -that this-letter be read 'at
the meeting of the Trustees scheduled for Tuesday, December 6,
1977 at 7:30 p.m. which is the date, ' according to -the' public notice,
that Mr.- Glover' s application is to be considered-.
This is to inform -you that the litigation has not been* te' rminated
and is still active. A trial was held in Supreme Court,, Suffolk
County and a decision was issued by the Honorable William R:
Geiler in Mr. Glover' s favor.' As far as ' I know, no ' judgment has *
been entered on this decision though* a judgment will most likely
be entered shortly. We _have been retained by Fleet' s Neck Property
Owners Association, Inc. to file a -Notice of'Appeal from any such
judgment and to perfect the appeal to. the Appellate Division,
Second Judicial Department; Brooklyn, New York. - It will be at
least several months before the Appellate Division will act on '
this appeal.
It is our .opinion that the Board of Trustees should not- take-any
action until the controversy between the F1e'et' s-'Neck Property '
Owners Association, Inc. -and Leander Glover, Jr. has been 'permanently
resolved.
/sl Stephen R. Angel
276
The following letter under date of December j, 1977 to the Board
of Southold Town Trustees was read:`
Dear Mr'. Goldsmiths:
This is with reference to the application of Leander B. Glover,
Jr. to the Board of Trustees for a quitclaim deed to land adjoining
land which the applicant claims to own on Fleet' s Neck, Cutchogue,
New York.
The land referred to is still' u:n.der litigation, as the decision
made by Judge William Gieler is being appealed by -the Fleet' s
Neck Property Owners Association, Inc.- -
Therefore; we' feel that this application should not be taken
into consideration.
Furthermore, we object to any public lands, under the jurisdiction
of the Board of Trustees, being given or sold to anyone for
private benefit. The recent precedent that your Board set in
denying the acquisition of public land for private benefit on
Fishermans Beach supports our position' in this matter.
'/s/ William Nicol, President
Fleet' s Neck Property Owners Assn..
Mr. Goldsmith made the following comments: I would say this
mould preclude any action by .the board at this time on the matter
but would like to make some comments. We, as Town Trustees, have
never .felt it was -within our jurisdiction to determine boundaries.
That is the reason the board said it would be a court decision
and not ours. There is one great difference over any other and
that is that it involves the cutting off of a' public access to
the 'water .that has always been in existence before. Never has
this been done by the Trustees. The public access to water is
very limited and it i.s. not being added to very rapidly by
acquisition by the Town or other authorities: Unless some
provision is made in that area where the public would have access,
it would be a .disservice to this town that `the trustees make any
such decision. ' I feel that the public access is an' important
consideration of the Town ' Tru.stees. We can empathize with the
individual or the association but' this ' goes far beyond that. It
is a precedent setting situation that should never be resolved
lightly and without due .consideration forr the welfare and benefit
of the town. If there were some way that an easement could be
granted to the town' in that area where a. roadway that ends now
practically ' in the woods would be continued by agreement mutually
made that some.'way or, another the public would have access to
water and that channel where they had it before or, if' necessary,
out to the point, .I think it would be to the trustees ! interest
to insist upon such arrangement. I am voicing a private opinion
and I haven't discussed it. with the board except for one member.
I think we have to table any action 'on this request of .Mr. Glover' s
until it is finally 'and definitely settled as to who owns what.
277
On- motion made by Mr. .Robertson, seconded by Mr. .Hataier, it was
RESOLVED to deny the application of Leander B. Glover, Jr.
for a quitclaim deed to land adjoining land of. the applicant which i
was filled with dredge spoil by the County of .Suffolk. pending the
result of the court litigation.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Goldsmith, Robertson, Horton, Hataier
Mr. Stoutenburgh. suggested that a letter be written to the Dept.
of Public Works for verification that they put the spoil there.
Mr. Stoutenburgh does not believe that this was filled by the Dept.
of Public Works but by Mr. Glover.
Mr. Glover stated the county filled it and he put more in after-
wards but the county 'filled the whole thing.
William Nicol stated that, according to the court records, it was
never clearly determined who filled it. Mr. Glover said, according
to Mr. Nicol, that he used his bulldozer to push it across.
The applications of Edward C. Thomsen, Neal A. McCarroll, Andrew
Galgano and Charles Berner were again tabled as no further
information has been received.
Mr. Robertson made a motion that the minutes of the meeting
of November 2, 1977 be approved as submitted. Mr. Horton seconded
the motion and it was carried.
The following comments by Dr. Thomas Samuels were directed by
Mr- . Horton to be made part of the minutes of the meeting.
Dr. Samuels: I can't let the last time that Mr: Goldsmith sits
as chairman of the Board of Town Trustees go by without a comment.
I have known him for twenty -years and at least ten with this body
and the Town owes him a tremendous debt as is obvious even here
tona.ght. His expertise and fairness and integrity will be very
difficult ' to duplicate in this body.
I have known him to have me move a bulkhead four feet and no
amount of prodding would change his mind. I came to respect him
for that. I respect Mr. Robertson, who is also not going to be
the board, for that, too.
Mr. Goldsmith has been in charge of this body in a very difficult
transition period when the emphasis on granting -permits went at
least 180 degrees. For a long period, he was castigated for giving
rights away. He took the blame and I rarely saw articles criticizing
any other members. As the nominal head, I am sure he accepted the
responsibility.
The town is going to miss you, A1.1_and Mr. Robertson. I know the
new trustees will carry on in the fashion you have set. I want
to thank you again as a citizen of the Town of .Southold.
i
(There was a standing ovation for the two gentlemen from the
approximately 25 people in attendance. )
i
278
Mr. Stoutenburgh congratulated Mr. Robertson and Mr. Goldsmith
on their.•.retirement. He._ stated Mr. Goldsmith had .done•.,a
splendid job' and" he" thought there- had been some new thinking and
he was .sure; .-hhat Mr.-., .Goldsmith' s leadership .had- brought, it -about.
Mr-. .Goldsmith, and; _Mr. Robertson thanked the .peo.ple -for their
comments and approval. -
- I '
. There being no further business to come befo,re .the .board, Mr.
Goldsmith declared the meeting adjourned at 8:35 P.M.
Respectfully .submitted, .
Mur-i.el_ .Brush, S.ecre.tary .
Southold Town Trustees
i
i