Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-8266 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LATHAM FARM - DIKE REHABILITATION PROJECT LATHAM FARM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DRAWING LIST 1 . COVER/LOCATION MAP 2. SITE ACCESS PLAN ORIENT 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS SOUTH POINT 4 . EXISTING CONDITIONS WEST nr: 5. PROPOSED SITE PLAN SOUTH �F *° 6. PROPOSED SITE PLAN WEST 7. PROPOSED SECTION VIEWS mt; " ua L 8. PROPOSED SECTION VIEWS 9 . PROPOSED SECTION VIEWS 4 10. DETAILS 1 )11%11 � SITE 11 . DETAILS 2 12. DETAILS 3 L❑CATI❑N ?SAY s a n 0 SUFFOLK COUNTY REAL PROPERTY TAX_ b MAP INFORMATION U DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 019 BLOCK: 01 LOT: 7.6 w SITE MAP LOCATION MAP E 4 SCALE: 1" = 250' N.T.S. E DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY 0 E C E I V E REvisioNs TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE DATA TABLE JUL 2 9 2013 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Wn �R DIKE REHABILITATION PROJECT Dike Rehabilitation Project - Site Data Table AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE OVERALL LENGTH r SITE LOCATION TOV WI�TIi TOP HEIGHT SLOPE LENGTH suRvevEo LATHAM FARM - LOCATION MAP O _ a� LATHAM FARM SOUTH 49 I I 8 0.620 620 o LATHAM FARM EAST Jv y 0.6 2so zso L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS X37 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 3 LATHAM FARM WLST d5 9 8 0.4 1000 337 1 Designed By: CFD scale: AS NOTED sneer No. 00 0o Drawn By: PFT Date: JULY 2013 M Approved By: CFD/RGD File No. 13050.000 d o mo' zoo' . 9 k ..,? z 41gg4 • Y tr .tl r 4 4p 1� 'j, EQ d b 4 q• prPm, A + y s rill, k �i� �T4 t , , r W`"yn L ;" h . xP a 4 }ti j, `-, � .• �, • . ' i ' t11� t J4 R lr VOR�"tt"i >wt ` aP-1 � t LOCATION MAP , r "" bb NOTTO SCALE n " 333 ✓,,,}J= yam. I 'L y{ a d: i 4 A .Y... .. w.. , i � a�R.•�Y`.h'C t .y z t P. 0 4 H F a N N U Q d v e Ai N� n iu O e yip • R ' u ; 0 E 0 E _ o a.. t 0 J C q ILII DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY y REVISIONS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY DIKE REHABILITATION ACCESS PLAN - LATHAM FARM (SOUTH) E w• AT ORIENT 0 ; A L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. to A III r CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 o A Designed By: CFD Scale: AS NOTED sheet No. 00 oDrawn By: LMY�PFT Date: JUNE, 2013n N 0 Approved By: RGD Fle No. 13050.000 1 / n Creeks ' 30 0 30 60 Tidal I Creek SCALE IN FEET / S�v 6,6 NOTES: 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988. Fry ; r I M« d 2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 O II l� Lk:; C119.a aII ^i sf r'S:. tl ss II , A J 0 �Juq'IYeo9 Paa1x9LS SLF79 NoI PVoa ' dlw Eatst9ncsdev, Bersc. I I„ \� lr)I- 3�9-;?0 "3 ia,�3Sr;7..19 "t 7 ; CBAveragr e5 9 Xer< Xe65r /r%rj9s / o xr se 'EL-20 . o II hall j.��it'R211'Jj i NfR:Si 1 h �I i ,I \ X262 �.,u� i•g 1' I o xx,,a31 obi, I N 11 n 1 -Long X I 19, I, / xase xan Xaa` / ro s5 ' / / Beach Bayes Y.1.� XB %A55/ %ei d2 / NdA3 xL5 %leg%ar6 %l63\ 05�5 %033 � %e/b 16H' / N Xa66 / L Q 1,099 / x/659/ %L zla3 /, flu / /�/ // • `/ 9 / ii X9.93/ O %Ub 990 997 3 asa SC Ui -� Z \ Xln led / \ V / X9%J U. / 1.51 Z F � / XL99 / / 6 NJ w,// Xdiu9.6]i ,X343 Longue o ��' / E / . ho. i 7m / Beach A a %rhe w `/ h / \`'9 Bay 0 .711 / sl o �'YN��1 / zrsa rl / /• � l E (I W5.9 A.c,, NIF Latham Farros Proporty LP (8- Suflolk 'dd // o ` Co. Dovelou ien�' i� �r� ''") �/-,es xeod _ / / / DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY 511PX.li'L9� ��F9'6La ,., r, �,r x,�r xald - i 9 // .x q,n / R d9, �� 7 5 / /kyo• REVISIONS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD / u?� 373 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY -ae6X"'X937 DIKE REHABILITATION w v �' ra6v � Xdta �/ g, s1s� � � zdea � .119 v %l/� -��` oe,e.r q+5p 00 av x6u i / P S w dg+50 00 LATHAM FARM (SOUTH) 00 —a+oo. d6 d �� �z EXISTING CONDITIONS E o _ %3d, - - Xe d xa� Q 0 0 / X1o3 x3]n - xrj, X", -V :ra L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 137 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 M Designed By: CFDScale: AS NOTED Sheet No, 0'•es.' ....�Y.�. 1 a''�Y " 'x aJ1 Yi o Drawn By: LMY Date: JUNE, 2013 3 _N M Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 a %305 7 X \OJ \\ 99 226 \ \ .1292 %(93 y — \\ O 596%SPP \ V\ %156 %6, U2 \\ 5971 %YJO \ 46 V \ A A \ %OJI \ 'AU'3� y{j� Long X" Beach ,4 o , x>q90 O A 1. a3 da�,.� i i r� A O f.e)YuPGa`13 d>Q@WTfB I \ an \ Bay I est ra z ^V�^o8hsia40 � e' , C c lf^ s 3Sr)71 L.'I 7 pUCv003 Iv 9 3.1f7 C.. d DI x LGA ' X939 A it 301 960D1,=1 009 \\ . ° �Tidal J�_ -31 ,3 '159 14'i31tii - v06 toGOD'IFI . %5°" � LI ' '31192919 9/1 14514 iO3.8d 2i.9n CklGODSEi 2a, xs \ Creek o � \ %11 \ %, \ \ \%9h7 A �\ x522 5\- 20 0 20 40 (n A x2.69A ( 6Q \ o y \\ %060 TTTo \ \ SCALE IN FEET z p k5 0 \ NOTES: 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988. ��^ \ 2 SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 . i O \ x1,29 ( xe,i� \ \ V V A %H07A%930 WX"n I 7777-22Y � I I X77 E l %v.s9 r9c� x7,6\ O I o ° I% 194 I k \ DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY %]96� \\ I gxas REVISIONS X 7 68 I d TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY \ L eJe92 LATHAM FARM (WEST) 65'5320 DIKE REHABILITATION S it x 199 a a6 075 E ° EXISTING CONDITIONS N CR 0 0 3 CONSULTING G SoCOUNTRY McLEAN ASSOCIATES,OR ATES OKHAVEN, NEW YP_C. K 11719 1 0 r2 ov Designed By: CFD scale: AS NOTED Sheet No. 00 N O Drawn Hy: LMY Dote; JULY 2013 N M Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 4 j a 60fr / %26 Creek S<.x 3 20 0 20 40 , Tidal s SCALE IN FEET 55➢ ' / Creek 00 1 1., x446 NOTES: �'� 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988. 2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 I <, "I >i:�i2 fs V1,h ns9l;i dp li, 18 II SL�19 19 ? l3A,((,hive s . i „ x . ., ,asd''.11tri1 X,,t2 § 1 L-20 I I \ X-9,92 --- Lf e bit ) x,Q3 X � I �- -Long FILL APPROX 1850 CY xa69 xl 1045 I' I / Beach Bay Yi55/ 9,9P / %95L jj x199%116 X1,63\ i OS 5 %033 p i / '�os3xXe,6 x/ Ip Xy5 R<r7X \S // 9,13/M 56 / g 941 %1. 1.99 CrV% / <y %1]0 df/ 196 %261 61 J d X1,61 o � 7 '� Long Beach X162 // / g s T: �.2 Bay LoWT r, NlIFLatham Far1136 Property LP (.1Y". SIiffolk {-C °.;y DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY _ i , x� X , / g � ,¢<,], � �/ REVISIONS RicTht;yj ,fc7� x:.9 6k / TOWN OF SOUTHOLD /Y1]9 9" SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY j _ DIKE REHABILITATION'96y� 6 %l,.J- %l,e X9 X �y LATHAM FARM (SOUTH) PROPOSED SITE PLAN / QGS� 10 Xe1 r 9 )P X017 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 137 SOUTH COUNTRY RD.. BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 Designed B CFD AS NOTED Sheet No. 9 Scale: +y[ Drawn By: LMY Date: JUNE, 2013 ) 5 j Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 1 x3as Gj 67 s� 20 0 20 40 X i 1 - o ss, \ SCALE IN FEET -- 9i60 _i: „�� ;-,'>.;h iti,3n`� i,� . ,, Id,\ A, _ - A' NOTES: r'n � 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988. \ \ pi6� 2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 . IN A A PROP. GRADE PROP. GRADE EX GRADE \ \ ' e, . e��.�� � ^ .s 01� 7n .e"�...*'.'A;� .tI 000Ex. GRADE 10 Long vvvv . v ,09 ;40 ?`� V�rk 910 10 10 ° F3II k#1 Beach ` ��, ko N [.cW47.6 ( 119.5 ) ��, ao ,,M9 ��tate, off' evf Yc i k 0 — 0 ° Bay 2 � I I 3 + 25 . 34 -10 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 -10 -10 e Nidal -10 0 10 20 30 40 _- \ V Creek \ cl9 \ \ FILL APPROX 300 CY k V \ r v,xa PROP. GRADE PROP. GRADE PROP. GRADE V EX. GRA6 \ X. GRADE EX. GRADE 1 0 `tid.e3 5� 10 DE 10 10 10 10 � �\ \ %0.60 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ 1 + 9 . 80 2 + 1 . 33 2 + 5 . 63 w -10 -10 - 10 -10 0 10 20 30 -20 -10 0 10 20 3010 -10 -10 0 10 20 -10 w g \ %d.]3 III A li 1111 i��I� V A o PROP. GRADE )I'I I Q_ PROP. GRADE PROP. GRADEII1111 II, III i11 ,AA EX. GRADE EX. GRADE I II I ,,I Illx_ ' 1 1 11 Ex. GRADE 10 10 1 151,0 Ill q�v v1 rn 10 10 10 10 1 i 1 xoyk9 1,1 I ` T C 1 X31 � I Ix 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 %dlb II I I I Q'9d9 'E 1 + 66 . 11 G_ 1 + 3 . 12 I x¢s, 1 + 0 . 20 -1030 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 -10 -10 _20 -10 0 10 20 30 -10 -10 _20 -10 0 10 20 -10 v I I \ . 1 \ \ 1 1 5]5 %L'N R.TO %Al2 36 O o PROP. GRADE J EX. GRADE o DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY 10 0 REVISIONS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY s 0 -- 0 DIKE REHABILITATION LATHAM FARM (WEST) 0 + 83 . 26 0 PROPOSED SITE PLAN -10 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 0 3 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. 0 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN. NEW YORK 11718 C West Berm Sections (10 Scale) Designed By: CFD Scale: AS NOTED sheet No. oDrcwn By: LMY Date: JULY 2013 G 6 M Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 a PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 0 -10 3 + 64. 86 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 10 0 0 2 . 62 - 10 3 + -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 - 20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 -10 PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 10 3 0 0 z Z 0 11 Z -10 To- 00 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -102 + 90 27 10 20 30 40 50 60 -10 Z S ROP. GRADE a IEX. GRADE N 20 20 20 20 0 0 a i 10 10 10 10 m i o, o p 0 0 p E `m D_ 2 + 2 . 44 2 + 65 . 86 -1090 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 3010 -10 -10 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 - 30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 E 0 V_ E 0 L O J C O o DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY a REVISIONS 10 10 1 NOTES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Y o SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988. DIKE REHABILITATION v w 0 0 2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 . LATHAM FARM aN (SOUTH BERM) SECTIONS � o 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 + 9 . 09 -10 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. 0 -10 �2 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 137 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 0 o Designed By: CFD Scale: AS NOTED sheet No. N o East Berm Sections (10 Scale) Drawn By: LMY Date: JULY 2013 Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 a PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 10 0 0 -10 5 + 3L . 67 —70 —60 —50 —40 — 30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 —10 EX. GRADE 10 0 5 + C1 . 12 —10 —70 —60 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10C PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 o, 3 N 0 Z O F U W N 3 —10 —60 —50 —40 —30 —20 —104+ 0 7610 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 a w r 0 w N 0- PROP. GRADE 0 EX. GRADE NOTES: o- O 10 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988. i m 2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 . 3 0 o` 0 E a 4+ 1g 0 E —10 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 w E 0 s PROP. GRADE o EX. GRADE 0 DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY io REVISIONS 0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD y SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY DIKE REHABILITATION 0 LATHAM FARM E no (SOUTH BERM) SECTIONS 0 30 10 10 - 0 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. I H CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 77719 " o East Berm Sections (10 Scale) Designed B CFD AS NOTED Sheet No. 0 0 9 Y Scale: N O O N M Drawn By: LMY Date: JULY 2013 8 Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 a PROP. GRADE PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 11® 10 8 + 6 04 9 + C3 . 11 - . 30 -20 - 10 0 10 20 0030 -20 -10 0 10 20 38 PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 10 PROP. GRADE PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 6 + 95 . 34 7 + 57 . 92 8 + 22 . 96 040 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 10 ajj 0 6 + 44. 33 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 75--8 0 90 100 0 NOTES: 20 2C 1, ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988 PROP. GRADE 2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 . EX. GRADE 10 10 0 0 -10 6 + 1 . 46 -1 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1101 PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY 10 1 (0 REVISIONS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY 0 0 DIKE REHABILITATION 5 + 8 9 3 LATHAM FARM -10 90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 10 (SOUTH BERM) SECTIONS L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. East Berm Sections (10 Scale) CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 77719 Designed By: CFD Scale: AS NOTED Sheet No. Drawn By: LMY Date: JULY 2013 9 Approved By RGD File No. 13050.000 O FRESHWATER WETLAND HERBACEOUS SPECIES : WATER FOWL PROTECTION CANOPY (DTIDAL WETLAND HERBACEOUS SPECIES : • Hibiscus Moscheutos — Swam Rose Marsh FENCE WITH SILT FENCE Ammophilia Brevili ulata — American Beach rass • Juncus Roemerianus — Needlegross Rush OO A c OC Distichlis Spicata Spike Grass g • Spartina Cynosuroides — Big Cordgrass Spartina Alterniflora — Smotth Cordgrass • Typho Angustlfolla — Narrowleaf Cattail X 6" CCA CURB STAKED EVERY 5' WITH 18• $4 EPDXY COATED REBAR • Spartlno Patens — Salt Meadow Cordgrass COIR MAT 700 FRESHWATER SLOPE SEEDING BTIDAL SLOPE SEEDING MIX MIX WITH NURSE GRASS PROPOSED ACCESS ROADWAY WITH NURSE GRASS VARIES NORTH SIDE (FRESH WATER) AMMOPHRA BREVILIGULATA O RANDOM CLUMP PLANTINGS F COIR MAT 700 EL 0 SEE DETAIL "I- WATER FOWL PROTECTION CANOPY O ,°�/ \\//\\//\\�\\//\\//\\ i/ 20 ARMOR STONE REVENTMENi SOUTH SIDE (SALT WATER) FENCE WITH SILT FENCE A C y \ /\\/ \/ /\\/\\ / 1.0 WffH STONE FILL E F \\ /\\/%\ j\//\// //\\/ '"i, SEE DETAIL 'H' 2. 2.0 \\/\\/\/\\ 00 /\ /\\/\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\ / / / 16" PREMIUM COIR LOG W/ STAKES WATER FOWL PROTECTION, II'hi ) O \/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\ SEE DETAIL 'E" CANOPY FENCE k SILT FENCE /\\/\//\\/\/\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\/\\/\\/\/\/\\/\/\ \ _/ -EL 2.0 SEE DUAL •c- /1T� X/\\\r/\\/r�/\�i\�i`\ \/rr /rte/��/i\\/ri\\moi\\/r\\/�' EL ' •', \\/\\/\\/\\/\\\\\\\\/\\ >\/>\/`\\`//\\\f//\\/\\/\\y/\\\F//\\/\\/\\/\\/\\\\\/\\\\\\'\\\\\\\\\ y\\\/\\ , w:_h}:�`\�`r11O AMMOPHLLA BREVILIGUTALA EL. 0.0 �'"' \/\\\/\\ \\��� \/\\\ /\i \ \\\\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ RANDOM CLUMP PIANTINIGS \\' \\ \\ \ %/��/n EXISTING BOTTOM OE 12• PREMIUM COIIR LOG WITH STAKES r d0 OF EXISTING GRADNUINR BOTTOM O SECTION` A—A RESTORATION ALTENIFLORA SEE DETAlu FABRIC PROPOSED RE-GRADING OF DIKE SEE DETMIL 'I" FRESHWATER HERBACEOUS SPECIES RESTORATION WATER FOWL PROTECTION CANOPY OO OO FENCE WITH SILT FENCED G " MIN ANGULAR STONE ACCESS B E ARMOR STONE REVETMENT WITH STONE COIR MAT 700 FILL AT TIDAL PIPE END BECTON TIDAL SLOPE SEEPING MIX FRESHWATER SLOPE SEEDING O PROPOSED ACCESS ROADWAY WITH NURSE GRASS MIX WITH NURSE GRASS VARIES EOGRIO OR APPROVED EQUAL) SLOPE RENFORCEMENT MATERIAL COIR MAT 700 // \/ \\\ /\ LAYERED ON 2'-0' INCREMENTS / / / / // / / / / `, RANDOM CLUMP PLANTINGS NORTH BIDE (FRESH WATER) O ` Drv;.\\\\// /%//\//\�\//\�\// /%// `S-{ SEE DETAIL 'I"O SOUTH SIDE (SALT WATER) 6" TOPSOIL N , 16" PREMIUM COIR LOG W/ STAKES • \/\/\/ \/\\/\/\/\ /\/\\/�\�/��\�/\\/\�/\ SEE DETAIL 'E' //\ \//�/\/\/\// / ///j'�/%'l////'///i/ O B FRESHWATER HERBACEOUS SPECIES /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ WATER FOWL PROTECTION CANOPY O // FENCE WITH SILT FENCERESTORATION \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ A C 3 \\//\// /\/i�/ /�\%\\ /\\%\\//\//\/i \\j/\\/7 w B \ �t\\\\\\�i\\\i/\\\/\\ //\/ � \\ APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER`,j;l Y,, .0 IIS O \\�\\�\\/\\/\`/\` % //a/�/i//,//,//� ///./ //, //. //.//.// // // EL z.o � '(', It 1{ I EXISTING BOTTOM oij f \ \\ \\/\\/\/\ \�j� \ \\ \\/\\ \\/\\/\\/"\ \\/' \n' �/\\\ % 74 \m/\//\/-\/� \/\\\\ \\ \\ \\ Tib 'i \\//\\•j//�/\�\�/////\\\�//////%/\\\\�//////\\\/////�/\\\\�//////�\\\\�//// //\ \\�\\/// qRIES UCTURAL FILL AS SPECIFIED \/\ / / /\/ % \// \//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\/ \///\\/\//\\//\\/ \/I\//�\///\\/\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\��\//\//\//�\//�\/��\//j\//j\//%\//\\/\\ O 12' PREMIUM COIR LOG WITH STAKES K \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \/�\/\\///\// L JEXISTING BOTTOM GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SECTION 8—p SEE DETAIL 'F PROPOSED RE-GRADING OF DIKE O 0 DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY Z REVISIONS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Y SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY o I DIKE REHABILITATION a L J EM DETAILS 1 � G 0 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. .�-. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN. NEW YORK 11719 M 00 Designed By: CFDScale; AS NOTED Sheet No. N O N o Drawn By: PFT Date: JULY 2013 10 n j Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 a STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SILT FENCE SILT FENCE DETAILS TEMPORARY SILT FENCE WITH STRAW BALES WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MINIMUM 14-1/2 GAUGE, MAXIMUM 6" MESH SPEAKING) 5'-0" DEFINITION DESIGN CRITERIA (CONTINUED) Max c MAX WHERE ENDS OF FILTER CLOTH COME TOGETHER,THEY SHALL BE ENTER TO CENTER=10'-0" MESH REINFORCEMENT USED SE TOINTERCRARY PT ER SEDIMENT LADEN XTILE FABRIC(FILTER OVERLAPPED,FOLDED AND STAPLED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT BYPASS FILTER FABRIC USEDTO INTERCEPT SEDIMENT SOIL RUNOFF FROM SMALL SEE SILT FENCE DETAIL TIED TO MESH DRAINAGE AREAS OF DISTURBED SOIL 36" MIN FENCE POSTS, DRIVEN MIN 16" INTO REINFORCEMENT CRITERIA FOR SILT FENCE MATERIALS 4" GROUND 4" FENCE POST PURPOSE 1 SILT FENCE FABRIC THE FABRIC SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING T PACKED WITH EARTH FON CENTER SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE THE PURPOSE OF A SILT FENCE IS TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN APPROVAL AUTHORITY SUCH PROPOSED STRAW BALE DIKE EFFECT DEPOSITION OF TRANSPORTED SEDIMENT LOAD LIMITS APPROVAL SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE STATEWIDE ACCEPTANCE IMPOSED BY ULTRAVIOLET STABILITY OF THE FABRIC WILL DICTATE STATEWIDE ACCEPTABILITY SHALL DEPEND ON INFIELD ANDIOR THE MAXIMUM PERIOD THE SILTEVALUATIONSTOE-OF-SLOPE ENCE MAY BE USED. LABORATORY OBSERVATIONS AND EVALUATIONS HEIGHT OF FILTER FABRIC i6"ATIONS MINIMUM FLS MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE a GRADE FABRIC PROPERTIES VALUE TEST METHOD CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES 8" MINIMUM „ GRAB TENSILE DO ASTM D1682 a a A SILT FENCE MAYBE USED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING STRENGTH(LBS) �Q� 1. MAXAELONGATION AT 50 ASTM MULURNBURST 1s0 ASTMD368s �� W . . QvQ� PERSQPEQCTIIVE VIEW FILTER FABRIC TO BE BURIED �— 6-� 18" CONDITIONS MAXIMUMALLOWABLE SLOPE LENGTHS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF FAILURE PD) 1$" EXISTING GROUND TO A SILT FENCE ARE. IN GROUND, COST OF EXCAVATION SLOPE MAXIMUM SLOPE STRENGTH(PSI) INCLUDED IN THE PRICE STEEPNESS LENGTH ET) 21 50 PUNCTURE 40 ASTM D751 WOOD STAKE 31 75 STRENGTH(LBS) (MODIFIED) WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MINIMUM 14-112 41 125 SLURRY Flow RATE D,3 GAUGE, MAXIMUM 6" MESH SPACING)WITH 51 175FLATTER THAN 5.1 200 (GAUMINISF) FILTER CLOTH OVER ELEVATION VIEW 2. MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA FOR OVERLAND FLOW TO A SILT EQUIVALENT OPENING 40-80 US STD SIEVE FENCE SHALL NOT EXCEED ill ACRE PER 1 DO FEET OF FENCE SIZE CW02215 AND 20' MINIMUM SILT FENCE TYP. ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION 90 ASTM G 2 3 EROSION WOULD OCCUR IN THE FORM OF SHEET EROSION AND STABILITY I%) COMPACTED SOIL /` UNDISTURBED GROUND 5'-0" 4 THERE IS No CONCENTRATION OF WATER FLOWING TO THE 2.FENCE POSTS(FOR FABRICATED UNITS) THE LENGTH SHALL BE A FLOW / MAX BARRIER MINIMUM OF36 INCHES LONG WOOD POSTS WILL BE OF SOUND QUALITY HARDWOOD WITH A MINIMUM CROSS SECTION AREA OF 30 SQUARE INCHES. STEEL POSTS WILL BE STANDARD T AND U SECTION WEIGHING NOT LESS THAN ICA POUND PER LINEAR FOOT 16' MINIMUM FLOW - DESIGN CRITERIA 3 WIRE FENCE(FOR FABRICATED UNITS).WIRE FENCING SHALL BE A SILT FENCE SECTION LU - DESIGNCOMPUTATIONSARENOTREQUIRED ALL SILT FENCES SHALL MINIMUM I4-112 GAGE WITH A MAXIMUM 6 INCH MESH OPENING,ORAS EMBED FILTER CLOTH MINIMUM 6" 0_ APPROVED NOT TO SCALE O /--- STRAW BALES BE 1GNCOMPCLOSETSTHEAREAAS EQPOSSIBLE,ANDTHE FENCESA INTO GROUND —1 SEDIMENT BELOW THE FENCE MUST BE UNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED. 4 PREFABRICATED UNITS ENVIROFENCE OR APPROVED EQUAL MAY BE CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR FABRICATED SILT FENCE STAKED & BUTTED A DETAIL OF THE SILT FENCE SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLAIN,AND USED IN LIEU OF THE ABOVE METHOD PROVIDING THE UNIT IS INSTALLED SLOPE LL CONTAINMENT - CONTAINTHEFOLLOWINGMINIMUMREQUIREMENTS AS PER DETAILS 1 WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS POST. STEEL EITHER'T'OR'U'TYPE 7 0 \\\���'''ppp'''REA END TO END WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES OR2"HARDWOOD LU 1 THE TYPE,SIZE,AND SPACING OF FENCE POSTS 0 6" 2 THE SIZE OF WOVEN WIRE SUPPORTS FENCES 2 FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE FENCE' WOVEN WIRE, 14-1/2 GAGE,fi" "'' "' - WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24"AT TOP AND MID SECTION MAX MESH OPENING 2 2" X 2" X T STAKES 3, THE TYPE OF FILTER CLOTH USED PER BALE 3, WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY FILTER CLOTH' FILTER X, MIRAFI 100X, El 4 THE METHOD OF ANCHORING THE FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE OVERLAPPED EV SIX INCHES AND FOLDED STABILINKA T140N OR 5 THE METHOD OF FASTENING THE FILTER CLOTH TO THE 4 MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL APPROVED EQUAL. PLAN VIEW FENCING SUPPORT REMOVED WHEN "BULGES"DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE PREFABRICATED UNIT. SEOFAB FNVIRCFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUAL STRUCTURAL FILL AS SPECIFIED 6' TOPSOIL TO SUPPORT VEGETATION (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN 18' CORRUGATED HDPE PIPE VARIES 6- MIN, ANGULAR STONE ACCESS (SEE SITE PLAN FOR 6' X 6' CCA CURB STAKED EVERY 5' WITH 18' #4 EPDXY COATED REBAR LOCATION) GEUGRID COR APPRUVED EQUAL) / � SLOPE REINFORCEMENT MATERIAL ONE–WAY RUBBER CHECK VALVE , /\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\V�� /\////\///////\//\//�////\//\//�1� LAYERED ON 2'-0' INCREMENTS INSTALLED INSIDE PIPE ('CHECKMATE ELAETOMERIC CHECK VALVE OR APPROVED EQUAL) VARIES /\//\// /\//\//\//\//\//\//\ i 6'-12' DIA. RIP RAP STONE ,/j\\ \\�\\�\\/\\\�\\�\\4\\\�\\�\\�\�\\\\\�\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/\\�\'��� HDPE FLARED AROUND PIPE ENDS 4%j�/j\//j�/jv/j�/j�/j�//��/j\//j\///\\/j���/j\/j\/�//\�/j�/\�/j\/j�/j\/ ij'�,,_ END SECTION ALL RIP RAP STONE TO BE INSTALLED ON 12 OZ. APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER FRESH WATER \ SALT WATER WOVEN FILTER FABRIC \ \//\/\// \ \// \^\\\/// \f ii DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY .,ri/i/./.i/•/•//`Y/`Yf?/,N/`%/` / \%/\%/\\���/\��/\�/\\�/�%\\%\\�/ \\�%\�%\�/\\\/ '\ \ii\\%\\%\\ \\%\\%\\ \\%\\i\\%\%�%��%\�j\1%\%\j\`\ _ --- _ '- :- REVISIONS TOWN OF S 0 U T H 0 LD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY SECTION C — C DIKE REHABILITATION TIDAL RELIEF PIPE DETAILS (TYP) L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 Designed By: CFD Scale: AS NOTED Sheet No. Drawn By; PFT Date: JULY 2013 Approved By: ROD File No. 13050.000 OSILT FENCE DETAIL AND STRAW BALE © FRESHWATER SLOPE DETAIL: © WATERFOWL CANOPY FENCE: DETAIL: A. SLOPE DETAIL A. ENCLOSURE FENCE A. SILT FENCE DETAIL B. FRESHWATER SLOPE SEEDING MIX B. CANOPY FENCE B. STRAW BALE DETAIL LH (SEE NDTE 8) - - - - -- - POST ��----- /� EXISTING WETLAND BOTTOM UPLAND SLOPE SEEDING MIXTURE MESH RE:SARY) MENT [ '\ LIMITS OF PAYMENT IIF NECESSARY) �; � (3 �- __ r - I SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILE - \EE 'FEET i FOR SPECIE$ AND EE LFlNDSCA P`L pE VEL OPMENT SILT FENCE ASSEMBLY) T-(iYPm COLORED 57RING J PLANT SrACING r. HARDWOOD STAKES 2 1.5m 1.5m 1.5m HT, X 2 / V OF_ 1! SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT AREA -- FSET _ ` \ 104" MIN. (SEE NOTE 11 / I 2' MIN. -4' MAX. / ITT - STORM DEPTH � ;� I —TOE OF SLOPE 50mm / � ^ m FLOW -EXISTING GROUND ^ w B^ TOPSOIL Om �•-' % ' ��� \ j;/ / h<„`� MEAN HIGH WATER - FRESH WATER AND TIDAL MARSH IT _ �-RETAIN EXISTING =1� /^ m B VEGETATION, / COMPACTED SUB-GRADE I7.bm 1 1^ ( I j m 9 - M MAX I IF POSSIBLE I 3 3 w I', I � ��� - � 4d `.�0.' 'i'i�--' // DEPTH i ( 1 A,rE �I 1 EXCAVATE TRENCH. BURY SILT FENCE FABflIC� "` AND BACKFILL/COMPACT EXCAVATED EARTH GEOTEXTILE SURVEY FACE- I, APE-- / EDGE OF PROPOSED (TY 0.5m (TYP.I FROM EDGL OF PLANTING BED - SEE NOTES L_ � N N TCT' SECTION - SILT FENCE - TEMPORARY / = 3.28 Ft ADDITIONAL BALES PLACED TO LIMIT DRAINAGE AREA (SEE NOTE 7) 9EGETA�Ep WETLANDS 1.0 M DETAIL COMPACTED SUB-GRADE AND LIMIT MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH (SEE NOTE B) WATERFOWL ENCLOSURE FENCE NOT TO SCALE r \�LH (SEE NOTE Bl TYPICAL WETLAND SECTION SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT AREA NOT TO SCALE mmm SO z li3 m /— MIN. (SEE NOTE 1) SG mm X 3.0 m NOTCH TYP, WOOD STAKE �---RADIAL SIRINGS 2 i HIGH POINT , — INTERMEDIATE POST L.LA �4 SEE NOTE 'I E E P-13 mm 14" (TYP.) —WOOD STAKES — N SO mm X 3.0m M / TrP. \ POST CENTERED INSURVEY SEE DETAIL as BALE AND DRIVEN su 150 TO E FLUSH 150 �YVlPS ",--TOE OF SLOPE / F �— sD m LO _ j' o e w00D STAKE sTaKE W 2 Or, STRING TYP.— B M F_` DETAIL AA NOTCH STAKE FOR a CLOTH STRING � � PLAN7 MATCP. A ART TO Sou[ —RETAIN EXISTING E VEGETATION, ' - — -- IF POSSIBLE GENERAL NOTES j 1. SILT FENCE OR STRAWBALE DIKE SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 10'-0" FROM TOE Of ;Ee DETAIL UB-- SLOPE, TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE AREA FOR SEDIMENT STORAGE AND FACILITATE MAINTENANCE N OF SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT AREA. Posi sPaN NOTE: 3 MIa X, 10.0 METERS I. INTERMEDIATE POST IG REQUIRED IF SPAN LENGHT DETAIL BB SECTION /4 /, Y2 r 1/z FM4 RADIAL STRINGS ARE GFEATER THAN 22 METERS. NOTCH STAKE FOR STRAWBALE DIKE - TEMPORARY 2. POSTS MAY . 1 X 1 THE HARDWOOD, 1 X 3 (MIN.) SOFTWOOD OR 1.3 LD/FT CLOTH STRING (MIN.) STEEL. SPACING FOR THE PROVIDED SILT FENCE SHALL BE AS DESIGNATED ON THE DETAIL GROUND BARRIER ELEVATION E DEPARTMENT APPROVED LIST FOR SILT FENCE. WATERFOWL ENCLOSURE FENCE WT m St., 3. BALES FOR DIKE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH CUT ENDS VERTICAL, AND BALES BURIED A Norroswc w APPLICATION NOTES MINIMUM OF 4". NOTE: 1.0 M = 3.28 Ft E A. THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF A SILT FENCE OR STRAWBALE DIKE IS TO REDUCE 4. THE BOTTOM EDGE of SILT FENCE SHALL 8E BURIED A MINIMUM Of s" BELOW GROUND. THE FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE POSTS ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF RUNOFF VELOCITY AND TRAP SEDIMENT. VELOCITY IS REDUCED, WATER IS IMPOUNDED THE FABRIC. BEHIND THE MEASURE, AND SEDIMENT FALLS OUT OF SUSPENSION. 0 5. MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OR AFTER EACH RAINFALL ; B. SILT FENCE OR STRAWBALE DIKE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON A LINE OF EQUAL OF %2" OR MORE WITHIN A 24 HOUR PERIOD. MEASURES SHALL BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED ELEVATION (CONTOUR). THEY MAY BE INSTALLED AT INTERMEDIATE POINTS UP SLOPES AS AS REQUIRED. 11 o WELL AS AT THE BOTTOM, AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL. 6. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN ACCUMULATION REACHES ONE-HALF OF THE MEASURE ° C. STRAWBALE DIKE OR SILT FENCE SHALL NOT BE USED IN OR ACROSS A FLOWING HEIGHT. SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AS UNSUITABLE MATERIAL. is NATURAL CHANNEL, OR AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW. 7. DRAINAGE AREAS: DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY r MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA TRIBUTARY TO 1004" OF SILT FENCE SHALL BE I/4 ACRE. REVISIONS GENERAL NOTES MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA TRIBUTARY TO 100'-0" OF STRAWBALE DIKE SHALL BE '/4 ACRE. m TOWN OF SOUTHOLD y B. THE FOLLOWING ARE MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTHS TO THESE MEASURES: a SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY SILT FENCE / STRAWBALE DIKE DIKE REHABILITATION �� SLOPE SLOPE HORIZ E o LENGTH LENGTH LS (FT) LH OFT) o DETAILS - 3 a r 2:1 25 22 3 3:1 50 47 4:1 75 73 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. �2 5:1 too 98 p >5:1 100 98 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 q Designed e CFD AS NOTED sheet No. 9. INSTALLATION, INCLUDING EXCAVATION, BACKFILL, AND COMPACTION OF STRAWBALE DIKES y' Scale: N o AND SILT FENCE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE BID FOR ITEM. Drawn By PFT Date: JULY 2013 2 a Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000