Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-7754 James F.King,President Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President o P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen W Southold,NY 11971 John Bredemeyer G Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J.Domino A�4j ���1- Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO' SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line _a 9 st day of construction % constructed Project complete, compliance inspection •''er 1 F'z .l BOARD`OF SOUTHOLD TOWN;TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 7754 DATE: MARCH 21},2012 ISSUED TO:;HENRY H.-TRAENDLY& BA"ARA A. CADWALLADER 4, PROPERTY ADDRESS: 13000 ROUTE 25, EAST MARION .. S 'TM#31-14-11 AUTHORIZATION .:y Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town,Code of the Town of Southold and in r W accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on March 21",2012,and in � consideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Henry H.Traendly&Barbara A.Cadwallader and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated m the Resolution,the Southold Town board of Trustees eee /r.r y ' ' authorizes and permits the following: ti Wetland Permit to demolish an existing garage and install a 4'wide path through the 100' Non-Disturbance buffer for beach access; with the conditions of a 100' Non-Disturbance buffer, the construction of a new dwelling and new sanitary system to •'• be,outside the.Trustees jurisdiction, a line of staked hay bales.at the 100' line; and as depicted on the site plan prepared b Tide Runner,En meernn &Desi n last dated P P P P Y g� g .:, g.:� . July 159 2007, and stamped approved on April 4,2012. � IN WITNESS WHEREOF,.the aid`Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, �• andl these present&to be subscribed by&majority of the said-Board,as;of thiscdate , ;; , , e,►,b• 5 013 ti ,; a 1 °: ,j �en,�rt."���r�0,+.e�°e,e'ae° ."d`C�ir�4e:L °`.t51,u4Y�aY�.' e.A YlOk�°iF�:f\1th�iu�L`,p`n •w"1,`i'�iu.�+ �er1P. ar,rt ae...0 iue ieaw'1"eYx'��L:i �ii ➢:n�i3. a41'SU,7s�e�e$ti.6�c.'a`�'a`r,aE.."°A'nYa2a�`du4�n''P9' i �;9 .",,. N� ♦.lelie 'rS/s,4 I 1 il.� �. �Nr 1 Nei• 7. I N•e - �.�ll (i���ac "' i i 1ii� ��i,�l) 1��•,x„ �.. •r,•.. .t.:.:.!:•r. _c:!_.::r �<44.sse1-• ..€- ....�.d:• .:��'• :S.yee __ ..M�,•t.. TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee Henry H.Traendly&Barbara A Cadwallader,residing at 13000 Route 25, East Marion,New York as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: 1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages,or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit,and the said Permittee will,at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties,.and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto,to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months, which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved,but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely,or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved,to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. 4. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized,or if,in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation,the said Permittee will be required,upon due notice,to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. The Permittee.-is required to provide evidence that a copy of this Trustee permit has been recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office as a notice covenant and deed restriction to the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provided within ninety(90) calendar days of issuance of this permit. 9. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. 10. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit,which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. James F.King,President ��OF SO Town Hall Annex Ul�o Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President '`� l0 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer G Q Michael.J.Domino 'O • �� Telephone(631) 765-1892 I�cou � Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 21, 2012 Henry Traendly P.O. Box 1589 Jamesport, NY 11947 RE: HENRY H. TRAENDLY & BARBARA A. CADWALLADER 13000 ROUTE 25, EAST MARION SCTM# 31-14-11 Dear Mr. Traendly: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, March 21, 2012 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, HENRY H. TRAENDLY & BARBARA A. CADWALLADER applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated February 23, 2012, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that,the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has furthered Policy 6 of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program to the greatest extent possible through the imposition of the following Best Management Practice requirements: a 100' Non-Disturbance buffer, the construction of a new dwelling and new sanitary system to be outside the Trustees jurisdiction, a line of staked hay bales at the 100' line; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on March 21, 2012, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, 2 WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that for the mitigating factors and based upon the Best Management Practice requirement imposed above, the Board of Trustees deems the action to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter.268-5 of the Southold Town Code, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of HENRY H. TRAENDLY& BARBARA A. CADWALLADER to demolish an existing garage and install a 4' wide path through the 100' Non-Disturbance buffer for beach access; with the conditions of a 100' Non-Disturbance buffer, the construction of a new dwelling and new sanitary system to be outside the Trustees jurisdiction, a line of staked hay bales at the 100' line; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Tide Runner Engineering & Design, last dated July 15, 2007, and stamped approved on April 4, 2012. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed: Foes must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $ 100.00 Very truly yours, fames F. King President, Board of Trustees JFK/eac Peter Young,Chairman y Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O.Box 1179 • ` ' Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., March 14, 2012 the following recommendation was made: Moved by Doug Hardy, seconded by Jack McGreevy, it was RESOLVED to SUPPORT the Wetland Permit application of HENRY H. TRAENDLY& BARBARA A. CADWALLADER to demolish an existing beach cabana and garage and construct a single-family dwelling, garage, install gutters, leaders and drywells, sanitary system and driveway. Located: 13000 Route 25, East Marion. SCTM#31-14-11 Inspected by: William McDermott, Jack McGreevy, Doug Hardy The CAC Supports the application, however, there is a concern with the location of the proposed sanitary system, the vulnerability to storm surges, and whether the project meets the requirements of other agencies. The CAC recommends the dwelling is constructed on pilings. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried I i.. OSUF FO(,� James F.King,President 4119, P.O.Box 1179 Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President yp Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen ti Telephone(631 765-1892 John Bredemeyer %y Fax(631)765-6641 Michael J.Domino y Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection[Worksession Report Date/Time: HENRY H. TRAENDLY & BARBARA A. CADWALLADER request a Wetland Permit to demolish an existing beach cabana and garage and construct a single-family dwelling, garage, install gutters, leaders and drywells, sanitary system and driveway. Located: 13000 Route 25, East Marion. SCTM#31-14-11 Type of area to be impacted: _Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment Administrative_Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: J. King B. Ghosio D. Bergen, J. Bredemeyer Michael Domino D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: BOARD MEMBERS �rjf sorry Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson � pl0 53095 Main Road-P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Diniziot Office Location: Gerard P. Goehringer G Q Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning p �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider �yCQ�My,�1 Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD R � ,VE® Tel. (631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 01D AUG 6 2010 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATIOM . MEETING OF JULY 29,2010 Southold Town Cled ZBA FILE: #6264 NAME OF APPLICANT: Henry Traendly and Barbara Cadwallader PROPERTY LOCATION: 13000 Main Road,(adj. to Orient Harbor)East Marion, SCTM# 1000-31-14-11 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without , further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated September 16, 2009 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there, appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP: An application for area variances (#6154) had been previously reviewed under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP)Policy Standards. A Letter dated May 28, 2008 was submitted to the Board of Appeals under Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Code and Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) standards stating that since the application involved individual setback, lot line and lot area variance and there was no presence of a regulated natural protective feature or bulkhead that the proposed variances were exempt. While this is a different application, it involves lot area and lot width variances. Thus, under §268-3(F), the application is exempt. PROPERTY FACTSMESCRIPTION: Subject property is a non-conforming lot located in the R-40 zoning district and consists of 7,087.05 square feet as,shown on survey dated Revised April 22, 2010, by Kenneth M. Woychuk, L.S.. It contains a 20.3 feet by 20.3 feet garage, proposed to be demolished, and has frontage of 35 feet on Main Road, aka NYS Route 25, 197.92 feet along the easterly property line, 38 feet along Orient Harbor and 184 feet along the westerly property line. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Requests for Variances (in this pending subdivision application) under Zoning Code Section 280-14, Bulk Schedule Attachment 3; concerning a proposed lot width of less than 156 feet for the applicant's westerly parcel (CTM 1000-31-14-11), and lot area containing less than the code-required minimum 40,000 square feet of buildable land for each CTM 1000-31-14-11 and CTM 1000-31-14-12 adjacent land owned by Mike and Viola Niamonitakis. Location of Property: 13000 Main Road (and 13220 Main Road),East Marion (adj. to Gardiners Bay, a/k/a Orient Harbor, Dam Pond Inlet). RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests area variances to create a proposed non-conforming waterfront building parcel with a continuous width of 35+/-feet between the two parallel property lines (side yards)and a 35 foot frontage along Route 25, as shown on the survey of proposed lot coverage by Kenneth M. Woychuk, L.S., dated Jan.3,2007. Page 2—July 29, 2010 ZBA File#6264—Traendly&Cadwallader CTM: 1000-31-14-11 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Prior to making this application the applicant was before the ZBA on two separate applications. The first application (#6154) was for certain area variances. The ZBA never issued a determination on this application because, while before the ZBA, it was discovered that this lot had merged with the adjacent lot to the east. As such the applicant was required to apply to the ZBA for a waiver of merger. The applicant was before the Board under Appeal #6207 requesting a "Waiver of Merger" of this proposed parcel, CTM 1000-31-14-11, which merged by Code to the adjoining parcel to the east, CTM 1000-31-14-12. The applicant was denied the "Waiver of Merger" under Appeal #6207. The facts that were submitted and considered based upon the arguments and submissions in Appeal #6207 may also be used in the balancing test under Town Law 267-b(3)for support in the granting or the denial of the requested area variances in this appeal. r The Board received a memo, dated August 25, 2009, from the Town of Southold Planning Board Office, with comments regarding the request for this subdivision. The Planning Board states, "The proposed application is seeking an area variance in the R-40 zoning district which requires a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing to create a lot, which would total 7,087 square feet. This lot would fall 32,913 square feet short of the required minimum lot size... The variance requested is significant, requesting a relaxation of over 80%"... The creation of a non-conforming lot so.significantly smaller in total area than the minimum required by zoning would be extreme and would not be in character with the overall community where the majority of the other surrounding lots do conform with or exceed the required applicable zoning minimum for the R-40 zoning district. For the foregoing reasons,the Planning Board does not support the issuance of the requested variances". FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 20,2010, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings:. 1. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(11. Granting of the requested variances will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The proposed parcel is not comparable in size to 1 the majority of the improved lots in the area. An analysis of 12 properties within the immediate area indicates that l six are three times larger in area than the proposed parcel, one is five times larger in area than the proposed parcel, and two others are ten times larger than the proposed parcel. Granting of the requested variances will create the narrowest, smallest and most nonconforming parcel in this neighborhood, and, should a dwelling be proposed on the subject property, it would further increase the non-conformities by requiring substantial side yard setback .variances which would only permit, if granted, the construction of a narrow and long dwelling, which is not in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. Furthermore, the granting of the requested variances may create a precedent for very small nonconforming lots to be created from the subdivision of other conforming and nonconforming parcels in this neighborhood. While the applicant submits that the circumstances present on Lot 10 support the granting of these area variances, this adjoining parcel to the west consisting of.20 acres was improved in 1961 and the last major improvement was in 1982, as per the property record card. This lot #10 was first improved pre-zoning and since 1971 the Zoning Code has become more stringent since the last major up-zoning. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The merger of Lot 11, containing 7,087 square feet with 1 Lot 12 containing 44,174 square feet, merged to create a 51,261 square foot conforming parcel. The Code required minimum lot size in this R-40 district is 40,000 square feet. The proposed subdivision of these merged lots would, by Code, require 80,000 square feet of pre-subdivided area in order to propose a subdivision into two conforming lots without requiring an area variance. The applicant has a deficit of 28,739 square feet of land area in order to subdivide these merged lots into two conforming parcels and not require an area variance. j 3. Town Law.&267-b(3)(b)a. The variances requested herein are substantial. The requested proposed lot width Page 3—July 29, 2010 ZBA File#6264—Traendly&Cadwallader CTM: 1000-31-14-11 of 35 feet will create the narrowest parcel and require a 76.8% variance to the code required 150 feet. The requested proposed lot area of 7,087 square feet will create the smallest parcel and require an 82%variance to the code required 40,000 square feet. The granting of the requested variance will create a substantially undersized parcel outside the range of deviation from the conforming area requirements of other nonconforming parcels in this neighborhood. The requested lot width of 35 feet is equal to the total for both side yards set back requirement of 35 feet in this R-40 District Bulk Schedule. 4. Town Law_§267-b(3)(b)(4) Evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential. community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. While the applicant has acquired a Trustees Permit, no evidence has been submitted by the applicant to substantiate that the granting of the requested variances will not have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood. The subject lot is not serviced by public water. It is located in a flood zone. Site inspection by the Board revealed a deep depression toward the middle of the proposed lot and unlike the majority of the neighboring waterfront parcels that have a bulkhead; this proposed parcel does not have a bulkhead. Furthermore, creating this lot would require the applicant to return to this Board for additional substantial variances. 5. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created insofar as it is the applicants desires to have recognized a substantially non-conforming, substandard building parcel, the dimensions of which were known to him when he purchased the subject property, which has historically served as private beach access and boat storage in an accessory structure that is still on the premises. The applicants have admitted that the reason variances are required is due to a mistake made by their estate attorney and that when they sold the adjacent lot(#12)they could- have sold less property, leaving the applicants with a larger parcel. Additionally, the applicant has admitted that the merger of the parcels was accomplished voluntarily for estate planning purposes. 6. Town Law �267-b. Denial of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Horning, and duly carried,to DENY,the requested area variance as applied for. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code,other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the rightto substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Schneider, Horning, Goehringer. Nay:Member Din izio. (Absent was:Member Weisman(Chairperson)) This Resolution was duly adopted(3-1). i RK.EIVED Leslie Kanes.Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing 1/ 3 /2010 AUG 6 2010 Sw :old To EL 7.4 Dark Brown Loam .' N This Site Plan is based on Survey by Kenneth M.Woychuck, LS Locking Costing at Grade �"►►�� 1.2' dated 1/3/07 last revision 5/20/07 Locate Drop'T'Under Coarse Sand✓£Gravel ` shown ore from field observations and or data Access for Maintenance ' •5 �J. . obtained from others. 62' Water Level Located �� � �% ' Outlet 10, of Pavement ♦♦ Water!in Coarse Sand Gravel , � ♦ N `, +� yp. Main road (5K 25) Boring By McDonald Geoscience 5AO107 / ` �♦ 8-4" 1000 Gal Septic Tank Detail / Edge avement Scale 1/4'-1' S o ► Concrete Cover ► Finished Grade ► Proposed /ell OO, V _ _ _ ` _ _ Min.4"Dio.Approved Aj 0, O" E - Pipe Pitched V8"per Ft. in z N Ex.Well ► Inl i _ r Ex Well 37.00' --- 25621 ► Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ® a -EL 85 Boring I.oc: --- ► ` N 3 n. 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ / ► -_ - - , t ► Collar z Proposed ► ` O 0 Pervious Q t �' SCTM ► achingSections v / I Stockade Fence I I Dwy 1000-31 1411 Q Q (fb Improved Lot 750' ► p - --------- - Land N/Fof ►► \ 8' E� I r 43 -- HenryTroetidly ► W ♦ ► ` Mir.3' Z (V v) ♦ I Land N/F of al 1 W w0 ♦` I Edward Burton �' ro osed L 1.8 r QPkn z ♦♦ O sidence I ` Ex- i' 1 Back Fill Material To Be Clean Sand And Gravel R W D ' Q 0 / ♦ t I t (p to High Seasonal Groundwater W OO t Improved Lot 1 1 Ex.Septic System SHALLOW SYSTEM♦ Q M 0 �F El 15.♦ i , In Proposed 3'x 3'-9"Porch �� LEACHING POOL DETAIL I m , Scale:1/4"-1'♦ �♦� t 6 0'5 2 � �' � C Z F--� To,be Demolished Lot Coverage Proposed ! %. Ex. Frame t 1 O ; ' 1 O >~ House and Porch 1,115 Sf or 15.7916 Garage , ai - - , t tD , o Deck 8335 Sf or 1.290 ( El.8.0 t CAP BLOCK SLOPE MAY VARY a Install (2)8'Diam by 6' Deep Pools o r r Total 1,19835 or 16 9% t " 1 I Install new 1000 gal \\j\j\j/\\j/� A W septic tank Lot Coverage Existing i _ DIAMOND BLOCK 12 INCHES OF FREE Garage 412 SF or 6% ( - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - ' Raise Grade 2.65'to Elevation 10 10.6o}{ DRAINING AGGREGATE ' Approximate Location of Y Neighboring Structure Line of Haybales 7 /y I v� Am I.ANDr,'AD O?Tm v.'HCIAND F'JUI":'JAF."Y O� /�\/ 4" OIA. DRAIN TILE (EL. VARIES) Top of Wall El 10.0 SHMIN ON 'I'I'2 ATfA017D SIMVEY AND D^,SCMV AS 1 I EL .1 DISRJI'.I3AN(:E RUI m- vnm CE P'r^m VED AND YmL F.eAAN \//\/ / z 'I t fZ UNDISTUREI:D AND IN NA IRAL VEGETATION IN r RPETUITY. 0 THE FOL WING ACrIVrq.S IN TKE rRESERVED AREA APX 6" 6" MINIMUM COMPACTED �2 Total Lot Area t 1 1 l 1 0 ► b(S rv' SPECE'1CALLY I';;O nW:CLEARING 011E CUTTING 07'VEGLTA1:ON, GRANULAR BASE > 1 I fCC ti.� t�--- APPLICATION OF CHEMICALS. EXCAVATION. GRAWNG, FILLING, 2'-0" LEVELING PAD 7087.05 SF or 0.16 Acres ► L 7. N CONS'IitUCTIOP7,E^.ECITO". OF ANY m7mcnim,AND USE OF THE AREA FO-t PAI'1MY3.MQJ OE OF MATEMALS,EQUTE"Ti!ENT O:t DEBP ANCHOR DIAMOND -- --- 'I I �' X C RAViTY WALL Proposed Retaining Wall �, Modular Block W/Local 1 I o --- / W X (SCALE: 3/B"= 1 '-O") Coarse Sand Bockfill Wall to have Modular Block w ifi� h�'f'R OV -�, `� O Stairs - , El. Datum USCG ne oa 'at�rasiorr-`a I BOARD O TRUSTEES C) a i L 62 Site Plan Based on Survey by Kenneth M. Woychuck H I I TOWN O SOUTHOLL) Dated 1/30/07 Approximate Location of O 3 ¢ z � A Neighboring Septic System EL .6 45 z DATE q xz- u w A 3 A L 7 Ex. ood Bulkhead //� / 7-0 I EL 8.2 w Note:All sanitary installation shall \ Ex.Wood Bulkhead i ; �� Jr r , } - SCALE:I01 comply with the latest Suffolk DWG. NAME: County Department of Health EL 7.8 1 - _.. //' �- OF �� �x Wood Bulkhead site Services Standards. , Mean High Water EI.3.0 F E 8 23 2012 "", * �J F t I, fir__- ' 'f 3 Firm Zone AE (El 9) (Panel 64) 7700 C? p � A��FFSSIOf1P�-�� DWG. NO.: Property Line FF El 13.0 I / 2 2 Orient Harbor Sanitary Notes 7/ Retaining Wall 1 -' g � \ / 1. There is no public well or sewage system within 150C. Elev.8.0 Elev.92 Elev.7.1 / Ma:-6.4 Elev.7.4 Profile Higl;:Line �_ 1"= 0'4 Elev.4.6 El.3.0 PAGE ) OF ) F ;sist � " `�4�;�'_ � ti/ An��+. r• .�,. lay'' J-'.�'' fA v '1• t �i' �,. �,� .l•'�F./ �" a`�• ( •r`,.� J '�i \ * * jet• i,+�°��v �'.�� IR _ �1 �., 'Yy t�+!�Ji {P iV'r'ti t, ;•�4 'F:3 �F� ... ^� '.w�?.,,,��,v,,�w`�•'.� 1 � 0 � e d 1�'�4 /a;,itj..2-:..�"�f '��-�'��'y.;',W'd'�4•*i ��T ?��.�i .. r '. ti tw lid ! Ma�;-�+ '1 y W14 r, '' � "t a`� , t-,. ,.. � OtlO-�lJl��� 0 o•al a 4 t . . .����, t� rZ�' '� 1 Zir'�,h{n�w•tir f��� � ��1:�.ij,. .';•� `, � �-. a "^•vim• _�� i.`41EY�d� '`l:..r,• .. t..n-, �'•=i:l�r>'uL.F_.. � ':;�`• � }'�.�,.'�, �.,,'�`'%,`. -.�y' " - - �`.._�.••: Lis 1 et 2 i r �t 6.Oy t' p VITI f. 9 Wyatt 4 �, t i 4' pave . TOMWA WE 4F, y r5 � y r s p a ry"i.d tt/ �,. t K'�W� �' q �•'.a 'D .,�i • Q a 'ram 1k �s 44 Utz �:,fi W�P Ot- ) DR. EC. t xo w�—ter— / w((O'N ' - SEE SN02 ---. -- �s m°e—n E[s—xo. SEE SEC.N0, 022 P\Tf 3 q\\ iq MATCN UNEY�/�/btM1 MFTCH UNE/'� NATLH UNE 1 \� OB-0S9] 14q SEFSEc .02 , wtu U 9) — 20 5 5W \ / 1f�<\ FORSEE PCL NO. Ot1290 M1 c/��� _T nn -s •x < n\• 0 '�/-' SEC.NO. y t.]A \ 022-01022 \nn 14.](c em ��* �sasax .1s f"•m'� 1t.a j'@ ✓ s 4' mi^,� Tmwo.svnroln \ s'tP pep 5 1 t10Y� 5-^ m O 0n 0 ' w ') 1.Pk)✓ 0122.01 tt.l) 11.0 •�'/ 3 S w a25 d ' Obt55�1 �` if✓ � 5 P 1 tt!>P' �_2°p y-2q/w \ •�. , 0 A OSII- 5b,/� 10p d .e 9 .�\, O s uk' t0 1DN •- s 23 \^' 02-07•N q1 ` 11.15 H.B f"^ W`'SMosttUc'� t0t '..ZZ �'. - 5 ]t 20A• 1.lAln���1ct' 2+r 9 MAIN BF2B 3 1 e roj \ 11. ls]1 0 ^^ S faS 'm't tT•tS1B'10 \ (ru.+:e�N - '� s 5 y`+/. M22-a t°zz-0a W y :., - ,te m c ° `.•P,y - 1z a SUM y tt tM1 S 9 t.tA(cl% ygtyct t0.1 d ti ae-ae �5 .•4E'ga M1 c3 r 4 2 hop 09-04'D SUFFOM COUNfr1110p, l P1 �' S 6 S ✓5 �sp.M1"�D ,g M1 '.1; a rA//. NWTERAtITHORIIY t& wl ,5✓ ✓ A 1°5 N S p° �/ ]I OR Pc- -N0 pp4't O ar '^s NpA s \k'* JOA P/ •„II.1 i'iA k ^a �r t,' °s °,p i t iW t.. ./..';' � I b d oWm OF s—o,. gyp a / � . I t " MARION LAKE ' ci �. .✓\� 2p• � SPP�tf s �., .aM19 »'• ... ,:: t °J'' r4�y !' ez)6 o'A w I ' 1° N' � ' 9� .r;A'0 � C �^ n ./:r � f:•' )S y, I � a5✓° '�' ; s°°•�` 2 qt s h a �'P 4j/• '�° ,// ? � ✓ S1D ep o °® a 5`M1 h"0,s ] °. , " MARION LAKE FOR KL NO. ✓110A P •95 P*a t ' +' t •ht F�nro 20.4 1 8.4A(U o 9 Z' @1-0523 N '••,p. 4 "9` © Z0.5 20A j T.vm..Onx�uTHIXD _ I R6 a• , 6 M1 .. .0 �,�oDq hb A 1 5 69R 1]3 FORKL 12h% SEE SEC.NO. C , y c �muNnoesou / 18 °'' d ° °pt�:� 'VV r '• ,�!° C2 31 0]°@-1]0 •✓� oevFtOrr[rrtwutR� M1t a•t4p A �e� h� ti f� �,/� � h �F `'�•, b+ m 11a° �„'$ b??,a4p..-���.+ .,^ A ��^d �.,,c M1oph�rvy��,?�: =`zi � JO a E (21) "- — r+oncE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E 03 a SOUIHOUJ SECTION NO c ,r ______ " ^ Real Property Tax Service Agency r N -..u. __t : GuntyGnterRIWM44,NYt1901 M 0 OJf 1 Or 31 o-u rt+ wv calmv sR Wan scAlP W FF¢T. P f ae a„ Ns,Ncixo toaD PRDPERTY btAP OFFICE LOCATION: ��� y0l MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex O P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 J l Southold,NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) N Southold, NY G Q Telephone: 631 765-1938 �plyCOU , Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: James King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees MAY 1 1 2007 From: Mark Terry, Principa l Planner - -- _ _ LWRP Coordinator I s rd;c isi Tru W; ; I Bc:,r� sty-s Date: May 10, 2007 Re: Request for Wetland Permit for HENRY H. TRAENDLY&BARBARA A. CADWALLADER SCTM#21-14-11 THIS PROPOSAL IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO ORIENT HARBOR,A NEW YORK STATE SIGNIFICANT COASTAL FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. THE PROPOSAL IS LOCATED IN AN AE FLOOD ZONE (ELEVATION 9). HENRY H. TRAENDLY & BARBARA A. CADWALLADER request a Wetland Permit to expand an existing beach cabana and garage and construct a single-family dwelling with decks and garage. Located: 13000 Route 25, East Marion. SCTM#21-14- 11 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the denoted following Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. Policy Standard 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested: A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. 5. Manage development in floodplains outside of coastal hazard areas so as to reduce adverse environmental effects, minimize the need for future structural flood protection measures, or expansion of existing protection measures and to meet federal flood insurance program standards. 5.1 Prohibit direct or indirect discharges that would cause or contribute to contravention of water quality standards. A. Restore the Town of Southold's water quality by limiting major sources of surface water quality impairment. 2. Reduce nitrogen discharges sufficient to achieve dissolved oxygen levels that would limit the occurrence of hypoxia. B. Prevent point source discharges into Southold's coastal waters and manage or avoid land and water uses that would: 1. exceed applicable effluent limitations, or 2. cause or contribute to contravention of water quality classification and use standards, or 3. adversely affect receiving water quality, or C. Ensure effective treatment of sanitary sewage and industrial discharges by: 1. maintaining efficient operation of sewage and industrial treatment facilities 2. providing, at a minimum, effective secondary treatment of sanitary sewage and where discharge to the groundwater is warranted, requiring sufficient treatment of sanitary sewage to avoid negative impacts to the sole source aquifer providing and managing on-site disposal systems: a. use on-site disposal systems only when impractical to connect with public sewer systems, b. protect surface and groundwater against contamination from pathogens and excessive nutrient loading by keeping septic effluent separated from groundwater and by providing adequate treatment of septic effluent, C. encourage the evaluation and implementation of alternative or innovative on-site sanitary waste systems to remediate on-site systems that currently do not adequately treat or separate effluent, d. encourage the use of alternative or innovative on-site sanitary waste systems where development or redevelopment of grandfathered parcels would otherwise increase the level of negative impacts on ground or surface waters, including wetlands. 5.4 Limit the potential for adverse impacts of watershed development on water quality and quantity. If A. Protect water quality by ensuring that proposed expansion or intensification of existing watershed development results in: 1. protection of areas that provide important water quality benefits 2. maintenance of natural characteristics of drainage systems, and 3. protection of areas that are particularly susceptible to erosion and sediment loss A Limit the individual impacts associated with development to prevent cumulative water quality impacts which would lead to a failure to meet water quality standards. Homes in the area are not serviced by public water. Therefore, please address the following policy standard. 5.5 Protect and conserve the quality and quantity of potable water. A. Prevent contamination of potable waters by limiting discharges of pollutants to maintain water quality according to water quality classification, and limiting, discouraging or prohibiting land use practices that are likely to contribute to contravention of surface and groundwater quality classifications for potable water supplies. B. Prevent depletion of existing potable water supplies by limiting saltwater intrusion in aquifers and estuaries, through conservation methods or restrictions on water supply use and withdrawals, and by allowing for recharge of potable aquifers. C. Limit cumulative impact of development on groundwater recharge areas to ensure replenishment of potable groundwater supplies.. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem 6.1 Protect and restore ecological quality throughout the Town of Southold. A. Avoid adverse changes to the Long Island Sound and the Peconic Bay ecosystems that would result from impairment of ecological quality as indicated by: 2. Degradation of ecological components Degradation occurs as an adverse change in ecological quality, either as a direct loss originating within the resource area or as an indirect loss originating from nearby activities. Degradation usually occurs over a more extended period of time than physical loss and may be indicated by increased siltation, changes in community composition, or evidence of pollution. 3. Functional loss of ecological components Functional loss can be indicated by a decrease in abundance of fish or wildlife, often resulting from a behavioral or physiological avoidance response. Behavioral avoidance can be due to disruptive uses that do not necessarily result in physical changes, but may be related to introduction of recreational activities or predators. Timing of activities can often be critical in determining whether a functional loss is likely to occur. Functional loss can also be manifested in physical terms, such as changes in hydrology. B. Protect and restore ecological quality by adhering to the following measures. 1. Maintain values associated with natural ecological communities. Each natural ecological community has associated values which contribute to the ecological quality of the Town of Southold. These values should be assessed on a case-by-case basis. 2. Retain and add indigenous plants to maintain and restore values of natural ecological communities. a. Protect existing indigenous plants from loss or disturbance to the extent practical. b. Include use of suitable indigenous plants in the landscaping plans for new development and in redevelopment projects where loss or disturbance of existing indigenous plants could not be prevented during construction. 3. Avoid fragmentation of ecological communities and maintain corridors to facilitate the free exchange of biological resources within and among communities. a. Each individual resource area should be maintained as a complete contiguous areas to protect the.area's natural resource values. Specifically, actions that would fragment the ecological community into separate ecological islands should be avoided. b. Where fragmentation of ecological communities has already occurred, the adverse effects of fragmentation can be mitigated by maintaining or providing connecting corridors to allow exchange of biological resources. 4. Maintain ecological integrity of particular locales by maintaining structural and functional attributes, including normal variability, to provide for self-sustaining systems. 5. Avoid permanent adverse change to ecological processes. C. Reduce adverse impacts on ecological quality due to development. 1. Reduce adverse effects of existing development. 2. Mitigate impacts of new development. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. The proposed distance to the new residence from the mean high water is 93 feet; the proposed distance from the sanitary system to the mean high water is 65 feet; a minimum setback distance of 100 feet from the wetland line is required for a residence and a sanitary leaching pool pursuant to Chapter 275-3.Findings; purpose; jurisdiction; setbacks. Please require that the applicant amend the application to meet the above policy to the greatest extent practical. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Jill M.Doherty,President ��OF SO(/Tyo Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President �� l0 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 James F.King Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen G Adc John Bredemeyer Q �� Telephone (631) 765-1892 �yIDAUNTI,� Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only F( Coastal Erosion Permit Application �; d Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit FES 23 M12 4! Amendment/Tran fer/ xtension v� I Received Application: QI � i Received Fee:$ fit - _/Completed Application ,---- _Incomplete —SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted oordination:(date sent) ,� �,•c ✓LWRP Consistency Assessment Form Aala' -✓� �AC Referral Sent: -;'--Date of Inspection:NJ 'Receipt of CAC Report: _Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: ,-Public Hearing Held: a' Resolution: n I Name of Applicant f eG j. -�.`I� Ghl� (�P�A �-t•�Ac�uJa I I Ac��(� Address?0. 60 1C 16&9 Tf'!*m & �T, IJ\ (l 9 4- Phone Number:(;31)-7-7 I Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - Property Location: ► �5000 (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: (If applicable) Address: W" Phone: a� I- ] rd of Trustees Applicatie GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): -7O 7 Area Zoning: R 0 Previous use of property: 18 C 8 C 11 C X A gfd:�rL '��nab Ly _3)VeLG.i' Ng v c`u sr�e 6 Intended use of property: (9)Z A 9 e Covenants and Restrictions: Yes V" No If"Yes",please provide copy. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals Yes No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision. Will this'pr�3'^�ct require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept. y Yes No Does the structure(s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy Yes ✓ No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date 1.R05-raeS 2ooS Jori To y1sdIci.rc,v4l Pore cM.rNA-rroiv No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or susp%enOd by a governmental agency? No Yes If yes, provide explanation: y Project Description(use attachments if necessary): D(3M 0 L/Se`/ Ekl S Ti N-9 /3 C(r4 C4 C �p vp n V<'- , ' 1-AF? f1 N6 C'a N S'U7 jNJ-C ' I-r 5c d enL �t� LL 14 �-1.�U C eg L AMdwAk-b ,AtCCV S 1 VQ o'F°� � �9j') s (9 N r-r(q s Ts rod) fl N ev f atv s D ►Z i v C,LV P v, &a ro-g d e Rs c v p - i A5t!, iN A (? VV PI h siC-Rn)Ci uV Bc i of Trustees Application i WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: L i 5 9 `` _ on LG� m s4 6A�e- ��c� L 0-M Cms$ ' a S; rn PA i ` ,L- dwa a ey- Area of wetlands on lot: JE< square feet Percent coverage of lot: .4 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands:0 V6 P, feet IvpP-TftEP�5-r 0 f-�i+-AJ" a5 � I Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands 0\/CI- 3GD® feet /�JD pT 7 � u1W L Does the project involve excavation or filling? No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? . `75 cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: •CD feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: TO-UC-l< i I( I I I Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): �JC) i"i � i I i Bc i of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: A Mo C,'5 14 %° �S+�!lO C6-A5+-2vC�t a-Si rr te- esi8,e-n 4; �'� L,A�1 c��4r�, ( (1 C.�.tI S+ �/� -� �(�, ,�-� s�rtJ r 7-R-� S' S•��� lire wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed acteivity?� � V U S i vcu �e C-7Ur� W Yes TU -I-Z) 1. ee u)c=GCS, OAJ �ULZCeri9, 'ii xjg S r'7�c C Does the project involve excavation or filling? '0 L F-s ��J F;r7V 5,-L i Vic;kq No Yes / I If Yes,how much material will be excavated? /\J1 (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed, including erosion increase or adverse effects on natural protective features. (Use attachments if necessary) PJC) Q � i Jill M.Doherty,President O�*QF SOUTjyOI Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President h Q 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 James King Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bee rgen G � John Bredemeyer 'Q • Telephone(631)�765-1892 ��COom�� Fax(631)765-664.1. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 30-YEAR MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT EROSION PROTECTION STRUCTURES CHAPTER 111-15 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE (We) The owners of record of property at: SCTM#1000- I in applying for a Coastal Erosion Permit for an erosion protection structure do hereby agree to a 30-Year,Maintenance program for a structure as described: i as shown on the attached licensed survey and/or site plan for the approved structure. It is my/our understanding that we are to maintain this structure with materials designed to endure 30 years and/or equivalent to the original approved structure. Any maintenance which involves more than 50% of the length of this structure requires approval of the Board-of Trustees. We further understand that failure to maintain the structure could result in a requirement to post a bond and/or have the repairs ordered as a lien against the property upon a finding by the Board of Trustees that said lack of maintenance would risk life, property or important natural resource features. Notarized signature of owner of record Notary Public i This maintenance agreement shall only be valid upon the attachment of a licensed land survey/and or site plan made within one year of the original construction and validated to show the final approval of the administrator. i I PROJECT ID NUMBER SEAR j APPPENDIENDI X C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 -PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1.APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2.PROJECT NAME 3.PROJ CT LOCATION: Municipality . '0�5-61,gttio"J, fjv 11q5qCounty 4.PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and R ad Intersections. Prominent landmarks etc -or provide map 0 , 1 o i'® 9,5 0 / SQ 0�Y l(,u e S-F o- >Pwn ��� ..�—t� a C� _ (`� S ' 5.IS PROPOSED ACTION: ❑ New Rfxpansion ED Modification/alteration 6.DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: L �"' �s i n 1 �1"t�Ue C.L 4J (2 i L i de n4 iCAC__Dw4e(l 'r sc � I !t y Sy STD? f v�- ®vs� i v� curg c/f 6 u �&S %a �2 �i %�� ,�-¢i�v� r�yL� s ��`�i� �,.c'> i 7.AMOUNT OF LAm6 AFFECTED: i Initially �4 acres Ultimately . acres f ' &WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? i Yes 9 No If no,describe briefly: - JRPl iqnce-s 9.WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) Residential ❑Industrial Commercial DAgriculture 0Park/Forest/Open Space Other (describe) 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, State or Local) , I i1E Yes �No If yes, list'agency name and permit / approval: tV y V I 11.DOES ANY PSPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? f Yes t If No yes, list agency name and permit / approval: Ir I 12. AS A RELT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? Dyes M No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE pplicant / Sponsor me � (� F�IQ � �(�(,� �� '1�r Date: I Signature If the action is a Co al Area,and you are a state agency, If the action is a6o� complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment li • ; i PART 11- IMPACT ASSESSMENT To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAR Yes a No B. wILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. Yes Q No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) Ct. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential foreroslon,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly:- C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly. C4.A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly: C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly: C6. Longterm,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in Cl-05? Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA CEA 7 If yes,explain briefly: ❑ Yes, Q No E. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If yes a lain: QYes a.No PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) . INSTRUCTIONS: Foreach adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important orotherwise significant Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural);(b)probabifityof occurring;(c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e) geographic scope;and(f)magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been Identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part fi was checked yes,the determination of significance mustevaluate the potential impactofthe proposed action on the environmentatcharacterlstiks oftheCFA Check this box Ifyou have identified one or more potentially largeor significant adverse impacts which MAY oocur.Then proceed direclfyto the FULI FAF andfor prepare a positive declaration. Check this box If you have determined,based on the information and analysts above and any supporting documentation,that the proposed actin WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.AND provide,on attachments as necessary,the reasons supporting thi determination. Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date President Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer)' SUFFQ/r Town of Southold N Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM 0 .L PROPERTY LOCATION: S.C.T.M.#: THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A _& 31 'q /MJM STORM-WATER,GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN . District section fro-ek— Lot CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ITEM# / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? I Will this Project Retain All Storm-Water Run-Off (Include Total Area of all Parcels located within ve7 A/F.- Generated by a Two(2")Inch Rainfall on Site? the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) (S.F.I Acres) (This item will include all run-off created by site �( ❑ b. What is the Total Area of Land Clearing clearing and/or construction activities as well as all — and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed F Site Improvements and the permanent creation of construction activity? r impervious surfaces.) (S.F./Acres) 2 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey Show All Proposed PROVIDE BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Provide Additional Pages as Needed) Drainage Structures Indicating Size&Location?This Item shall include all Proposed Grade Changes and �i Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow. cir 3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion G N bPV and sediment control practices that will be used to control site erosion and storm water discharges. This El �(n COy y�-t-(Z,c f�a a item must be maintained throughout the Entire Construction Period. e 1) 4 Will this Project Require any Land Filling,Grading or 1 qq ' 11 Excavation where there is a change to the Natural ❑ %� (� tYt,(!1ktiQ Existing Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards of Material within any Parcel? nC �' y �" - " 5 Will this Application Require Land Disturbing Activities Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand X (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface? — 6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the Site? Is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction — General DEC SWPPP Requirements: or within One Hundred(100')feet of a Wetland or Submission of a SWPPP is required for all Construction activities involving soil Beach? disturbances of one(1)or more acres; including disturbances of less than one acre that 7 Will there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes are part of a larger common plan that will ultimately disturb one or more acres of land; which Exceed Fifteen(15)feet of Vertical Rise to ❑ including Construction activities involving soil disturbances of less than one(1)acre where x the DEC has determined that a SPDES permit is required for storm water discharges. One Hundred(100')of Horizontal Distance? (SWPPP's Shall meet the Minimum Requirements of the SPDES General Permit 8 Will Driveways,Parking Areas or other Impervious for Storm Water Discharges from Construction activity-Permit No.GP-0-10-001.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm-Water Run-Off ' i 1.The SWPPP shall be prepared prior to the submittal of the Not.The NOI shall be into and/or in the direction of a Town right-of-way? — submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction activity. j 2.The SWPPP shall describe the erosion and sediment control practices and where 9 Will this Project Require the Placement of Material, l required,post-construction storm water management practices that will be used and/or Removal of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any ❑ j constructed to reduce the pollutants in storm water discharges and to assure Item Within the Town Right-of-Way or Road Shoulder 7` j compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit.In addition,the SWPPP shall Area?(This item will NOT include the Installation of Driveway Aprons.) identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of storm water discharges. NOTE: If Any Answer to Questions One through Nine is Answered with a Check Mark 3.All SWPPPs that require the post-construct(on storm water management practice in a Box and the construction site disturbance is between 5,000.S.F.&1 Acre in area, component shall be prepared by a qualified Design Professional Licensed in New York a Stonn-Water,Grading,Drainage&Erosion Control Plan is Required by the Town of that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of Storm Water Management Southold and Must be Submitted for Review Prior to Issuance of Any Building Permit. (NOTE: A Check Mark(4)and/or Answerfor each Question is Required for a Complete Application) I STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF...........V;¢.�e-t..1.............SS ' I That I, e NQ fZ ll .v.t�.Z:.`......................being duly swum,deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Permit, .................. ........... (Name of individual signing Document) And that he/she is the ..J . (Owner,Contractor,Agent,Corporate Officer,eta) Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in die application filed herewith. j Swom to before me this; ..................1 .....................da of..... UGt(v 20. J(f8nnefagaw No Public: r' Public,Suffolk . Notary h Kota Q1114991�77 .My' 0- (Si at of AppOpn. i I FORM - 06/10 �` ��OguFFOL4.�d James F.King,President H - Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President P.O.Box 1179 O Dave Bergen Southold,NY 11971 , � T'F John Bredemeyer Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J.Domino 1 y' Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -----------------------------------------=------------=-------- In the Matter of the Application of HENRY H. TRAENDLY& BARBARA A. CADWALLADER COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, �14y'jt?� �i4ir'�� L� ,residing at/dba < ��1F /� �J ry ?a R'G T- AN y I t`:t 1V r being duly sworn, depose and say: That on,theZ�? day of eV.41(C h , 201tt, I personally posted the property known as. 5 CT iIf- 1( by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place:for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wed..March 21, 2012. Dated: 3-10t-I a. (signa e Sworn to before me this _ day of fflanc& I A I JEAN P.HEBBERD Notary Public;State of New York No.50446/6 Qualified in Suffolk County 1 ` Commission'Expires June 5,20 I S N tary Public t PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: . i tYl 6e0C91'r67112, ti,� iic) °9 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY—OFF SUFFOLK //6,,v`�Ir G� `e 4fdL ,residing at �� be •`� i�q q 'T Me4 V0& y.� 1 Q ,being duly sworn, deposes and.says that on the l Z 90 day of G h , 2Q!� deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at R"4 ,that said Notices were maile ach of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. 1 Sworn to before me this / Day of rY OA C/ , 20 / JEAN P.HEBBERD i I Notary Public,State of New York No.5044676, j Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires June 5,2 Notary Public i I I Bc I of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York 14z �'Y►� � , �d lades BEING DULY SWORN DEPO ES AND A FIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE.THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S),TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THI , ICATION. S' atur SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OFF 520 17- ` 7 Notary Public LAUREN M.STANDISH Notary Public,Stale of New York No. 0 ST616400€� Qualified in Suffolk Countyy . Commission Expires April 9,7_[I I I I BcW of Trustees Application* AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) I, residing at (print owner of property) (mailing address) do hereby authorize (Agent) to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. (Owner's signature) I i I APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. , 1 YOUR NAME:'--rP_P (Last name,first name,jp ddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate,the.other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other f (If"Other',name the activity.) I Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship.with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. I I YES NO if.you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. �j �I DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP I Submitted this�71;'�,Iday of• 20017- _ I Signature Print Name . l Form TS l i i I Town of Southold i LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM ! A. INSTRUCTIONS I 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal.Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the prepares of this form should review the exempt -minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its si ing ficant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be exMlained in detail, listind both supporting and non- j supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and �. conditions,it shall not be undertaken. i A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's i website (southoldtowh?riorthfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all I local libraries and the Town Clerk's off ce-.— B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION I SCTM# 1000 c ` I PROJECT NAME ' ?, ie�,4 am- ro h by na C.Lra �15�12c1��� 6; r q le-Finn i by �r.1&vv4A 4-L-jL L)e l i 1 �2 Cl{��(,/kv�1� rid �G(v ' �t�o=r Gb 2 m. The Application has been submitted to (check ppropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept.t. d Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate'response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(a•g• capital ❑ construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ❑ i � (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan,subsidy) I (� (c) Permit, approval, license,certification: l Nature and extent of action: M0 1.' i S 1A C k-bc-v16k 4- czar-c-c P -f i f-YYzc�c� G� S L ry � Sin/ �. l ��ZV�' v�s I��z,i c w,4 y, 60i7--ins 7--a tiUcZLS, d pl L��v�ZLi nli Vic& MM64/ Location of action: i Site acreage: s f f � ^ t- j Present land use � G i Present zoning classification: 0 I 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Vi x j( e r (b) Mailing address: • r� 5�' �S r'i ti J I (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) (p�j� i 7� ' j i ! (d) Application number, if any: I Will the action be directly undertaken,require finding� or approval by a state or federal agency? i Yes I/No❑ If yes,which state or federal agency? 4 De C' i ! i C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY F Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No [�fNot'Applicable y_ j � o P.M s ® ►U��`c,r1 Y h o c CLAA Q i i I. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Poli 'es Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ! ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable i � A-PC 00 DC -a Ap_'So U-r Attach additional sheets if necessary I Policy 3, Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See I j LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No 2Not Applicable 1 �j O Grr-c-x--I Attach additional sheets if necessary } Il NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policie7Not s 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No Applicable j o Ci G j � . I i Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect"and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages.16 througb 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No QNot Applicable j I I o J Gam. i Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy, 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ ❑ Yes No Not App. de _ j Attach additional sheets if necessary . Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. f I ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable . i f i Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste.and hazardous substances and waste . See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable i to moo. Li _ W PV`5T�0iZ- Q0 PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public �. resources of the. Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. 1 ❑ Ye�] No Not Applicable i i Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES I I Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. i. ❑Yes ❑ No VNot Applicable C) ,� L r. Attach additional sheets if necessary i ii Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island,Sound, the Peconic Estuary and TowYNotApplicable rs. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No _ f o-e� � j J i ry-, P,i nC__ i ; i i II Attach additional sheets if necessary i I Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for eval tion criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not_Applicable li Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No [/Not Applicable 60.5 oe r P, t- so v deces li PREPARED BY R 4,f c1 Iq&R64A- TITLE ()(,U 0Ok-,5 DATE�O ' i