Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-142.-1-27 i i I KEMPEY ENGINEERING PARKING CALCULATIONS SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS AREA NAME AREA SIZE CODE REQ. REQUIRED PROPOSED REQUIRED DRAINAGE = 40.34 V.F. AREA AREA DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN TOTAL TOTAL 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SQ.FT. SPACE/100 SQ. FT. 27 SPACES 25 SPACES 2758 CU.FT, / 68.37 CF/VF = 40.34 EXISTING DRAINAGE FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW BY WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 * INCLUDING (1) HANDICAP PARKING SPACE S PAC E: P: 631.321.7777 (3) @ 10' DIA. X 8' DEEP = 3 x 8' = 3 x 8' = 24 V. F. NAME SIZE SANITARY: GREY: TOTAL: SPACE SITE DATA PROVIDED DRAINAGE CONVENIENCE 2,670 0.03 gpd/sf 0.02 gpd/sf 0.05 gpd/sf 134 gd F: 631.661.0486 3 x 8' = 24 V. F. STORE SF =80 gdp =54 gdp =134 gdp 134 gdp ITEM AMOUNT % (3) I@ 10' CIA. X 8' DEFF = 3 x 8' 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE ORIGINAL PLOT SIZE 24,140 SQ.FT. TOTAL DRAINAGE (0.55 ACRES) 48 V.F. CALCULATIONS FOR STORM WATER RUN-OFF RETENTION ION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 P. 631.368.3324 DEDICATED AREA (INCL. SOME 249 SQ.FT, AREA RUN-OFF COEFF. FT. OF RAIN CU.FT.RETENTION REQ'D N REO'D F. 631.368.1524 LANDSCAPE AREA) PAVEMENT 12,693 SQ.FT. 0.9 0.17 1 c r. T. REVISIONS: FINAL PLOT SIZE 23,891 SQ.FT. 100 m LANDSCAPE 8,528 SQ.FT. 0,25 0.17 362 CU.FT. J.FT. Date Description No. BUILDING AREA 2,670 SQ.FT. 11.18 BUILDING 2,670 SQ.FT. 1.0 0.17 454 CU.FT. J. FT. PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK/CURB AREA =12,693SQ.FT. 53.13 (2758 CU.FT. 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS J. FT. FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF SO=OLD PLANNING BD. TOTAL LANDSCAPING/ BUFFER 35.69 / AREA a MAMITUCK/PLAZA LLC TOTAL 23,891 SQ.FT. 2758 CU.FT. 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD J • COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 UNDEVELOPED AREA 0 SQ. FT. 0 TC 18173 K 17.95 B" CONCRETE BG 18.32 ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (8) X1]•]5 X17.41 %1692 SITE LOCAT EXISTING B" CONCRETE RETAINING - u G USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER OCATION 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD ONG NORTHERLY Y LINE A S P H A L T P A R K I N G COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 ZONING INFORMATION / PRWALL OPERTYN LINE NORTHERLY / LILll ~P 21,00 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD i COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 SCTM#'S: / n c 19.as g BC 19.7 146.00 x1B.e0 s1q 1 STREET ADDRESS: 9945 MAIN ROAD, MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NY ti E N ¢$057'30" E 30 E ZONING DISTRICT: B-GENERAL BUSINESS R E IST. PROPOSED B' HIGH SECURITY SHNEO AREA INDICATES PROP. S X 70' TRASH PROPS CU. TO. TRASH $ 7 f( 11/12/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD LANDSCAPE FRONT YARD REQUIRED: 4,193 SQ.FT. m ROPOSED 8' HIGH S pg4Po5EO 'NO N LANDSCAPE FRONT YARD PROPOSED: 5,420 SQ.FT. ~ EIOx (sEE PROP. 1500 GALLON CA N GRACE TO BE FILLED IN. ENCLOSUR ON Cpl: P Il',N I E "y 5 - 11 COMPACT FILL MATE RNI, EL 24.39 L 2 I CONTAINER (TYP.) LOP 1500 GALLON GREASE El 23170 2YI' , COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE REQUIRED TO BE IN FRONT YARD: 50% nnul e' W- TRAP (B' DIAM, 5' LD) TO 95X Mm' DENSITY. AP (B' DIAM 5 LD) PROP. BOLLARD PROPOSED 5' HIGH SECURITY ~u' ~IAG4 ` L9q'Au PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE PROPOSED TO BE IN FRONTYARD: 64.64% U NOT 0 0 (TO B MR CED Nu M,E„• SGx CHAIN LINK FENCE A SY I L ~I ,~i D 0 MR CED NUA Y) - (TY T-31 GUARDRAIL WITH W6r6.6 r - l~ 1 12/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 40'-0" SEWER ELEC - TP~yOST EVERY 6'-3' O.C. I s -W l' I 1f 14. 0 BIT R L' METER METER TIC 14.90 BW 9'.92 1N k YW" KF~' COMMENTS DATED 12/07/10 FRONT YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 77'-1R METER METE SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 15'-0" k~ BO 22.1 pw° EZZ;O TO 2 .19 BC 2 .40 N FV 4Y" ROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SF L J L TC 24.90 SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 49'-2"~ i C 59 L PROPOSED TOTAL 7:ONVENIENCE STORE AREA= 2275 S.F.) BC 24.40 LIST OF DRAWINGS: REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 25'-0" "oE t , (CONVENIENCE ST REAR YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 21'-8" .1"•'L^P~'"` " m MH 23.70 o PROP. STACKED _ RU&NING WALL SEE 1~4 f Y 5~ 7 A~ A~ a' Moe uex d w x / ewaws[o v N / mcxcx oRxx RON, 1200 CAL. D w7~ -W OET. ON SP-3 X 16.25 x 17.75 P 4 61 v G Sheet Description b kEEI' NEx1 } ` SEPTIC TANK (TO BE ZTANK( SHIDED AREA INDICATES 3 y a ir` rI CRAPE T To B BE FILLED IN. U7 TOME . CEN91tt I \ 3 Dn S I Yf/ CURRENT USE: GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE O SERVICED EWR = O PROP YEARS MIN SP-1 KEY MAP SITE PLAN PROPOSED USE: 7-ELEVEN CONVENIENCE STORE DDL "PONS TC 2 .64 / R111 -10 / POLE uSUUTEG _ FP' M-Ir1~„ L /PRb /,G. - N TT'I smnece EMPLaree E, s?'~ - b PARKING CALCULATIONS 0 oR q 1xIIG(•910.Y DD 685 SF. PR POSED ADDITION L/ PMHINC ONLY (Ott. 2) A L T P A R K I N D -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ED 22.8 see oewL 685 SF. Q- a w-Ri L, i.e1 2ze5) SANITARY CALCULATIONS .w ED L Ensr, e' a 1o' 0 . TC 25.00 2 YF-Y NfAP aa. L.P. BC 24.50 SP-1 " TC 3 Sim o xA, VOID LEAD I 'I ry POOL TO R AN -ZONING ANALYSIS y 24. 4 C 24 BC 23.8 74 . 4 C 24.4 PRO "ATM' EXISTING 8" CONCRETE RETAINING WALL ALONG EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE TO BE MODIFIED AS 1 1/ 24.4 C 24.4 WIN OW SIG TC 24.74 REQUESTED TO CONSTRUCT CROSS ACCESS IF STRIPE STANDARDS -STANDARD COLO14S 3M FILM MATERIAL SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN LEGEND TD 2336 NYTI 4 24.4 C 21 s £p Q ffi'Sl . BC 24.24 R REQUIRED, ruTealAL -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE 24. TC = TOP OF CURB UMP IS ND n EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE PROTECTED G 0' UMP IS ND ! DURING CONSTRUCTION. -LANDSCAPE NOTES BT = BOTTOM OF CURB Wr" TO B REMO c ~ 4v ~ TC 25.00 U B REMD A-RED C- GREEN / TC 4 7-31 POST DE GUARDMIL X 3680-53 (CARDINAL RED) 3680-58 (DARK GREEN) 6'-3* 0.WITH0. W6.15,5 18.90 BC 24.2 BC 23,50 Q EQUIVALENT PMS # 1787 EQUIVALENT PMB #342 P OP. T,O.G. ROP. "7-11" WOOD CARVED / AVERY# 10838.7.41 RED AVERY# 10835.711 GREEN EL = ELEVATION EXIST. °f P OP. T,O.G.- BUILDING 04 Tc 23.7 IN ET WALL SIGN W/ GOOSENECK PROPOSED 1" DIM, SCHEDULE K B-ORANGE D- WHITE SP-4i -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN ¦ = MONUMENT L ~~y~ T n1 P. m BC 24.2 .i E .E22.75 -E .22.75 LIGHTING COPPER WATER SERVICE L (r1D' , " 3823 (BRIGHT ORANGE) ~y¢I F reP PROPOSED LOCATION EQUIVALENT PMS $165 E-BRONZE -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY DRAINAGE FLOW V e s m \ BC 24.5 EXIST, E 2'0 A = UTILITY POLE 0 A EL I OF FUWRE CROSS AVERY# 10837-711 ORANGE PANTONE 19-1116 NEW G005E - NEW G005ENECK 51GN ~e o LP. PROP. T,O,I C 23.25 . ACCESS TO ADJACENT LIGHT WITH F 'AS P 15urvD INLET EL. 22.50 22.75 PROPEW KEFLECTOR. tPH •SITEDETAIL LIGHT WITH ANGLE -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN REFLECTOR QOj' O F " 6,1' TOSBE REM WO AN, O n BE REMOKD ~ @C II \ \ TC 20.02 ~__N NFW 7 I / LI T -MF 9 1IA" THire Wnnn A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS ~ry PROP. MONUMUQT 'd• 11 . ' Ex sr. cun6DRNL TO BE REMOVED ® TC 23.25 PANEL- WHIT PANEL- WHITE- WITH CARVED ~0 •l >-ELENN-'" SIGN 9YJN i. YC ZS. O PNDPMED BO 22.75 \XppxOi fMP' STMKEp RETAINING WAIL SEE TC 20,40 7-I 51GNA( -PROF ' TC BC 2423.D 90 II , DET OET. ON SP-3 7-1 1 51GNAGE WITHIN A-2 •EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS 6C 24 70 DATUM: USGS- NGVD 1929 F OR a~C 2s,9e 244 so", oEOI C 3.5 TC 23.50 OR WORE TOPNING S mPRWENENR COLUMNS-4 NEW 101, 5QUARE WOOD COLUMNS- WHITE- WITH 12" N m4. 2 I MI US 2255 Q_ m _ 4-I~ SQUARE 5T( LT~2 SQUARE STONE 5A5E, TO EL 24.64 % 4W,~~'ot % 4u~~'WSN' EL 24.32 a MATCH BUILI 24.54 "PwSlm % m n D MATCH BUILDING These plans are an instrument of service and are the properly of the Engineer. Infringements will be BC 2e C 26.58 Aq I• . ~u46J 57'3 P W 2_AwSEI 26.95 x EL D2' 420 SGE EL q zz'SO L 2 's+n• sIDN. % 22st Nxx DXN ryMM 7'~iTf BC 23.0 _BC 23.00 A NEW I O" 5Q slow 210< •`•1g % d 015 kL L 22,01 E%IST. SIN TC 2101 TO 22,57 2 2w rn Row. N rwPassD txmw¢ ILE MARKER tiT' • s •LE...r.^.[~ ?:';.:,~.r;~ v'a'+' •.•z••yl ; a••,w 4 prosecuted. 20,a 26. %25.95 'I!Y..~.h.,(.'. ANEW.~AON•0,,91I~WAL MIMS TO I 24.56 BC 26.23 % •JJ~ Exl$T. 51 NEW TURF UTI TY STIR Irf.NC t':~r~xYNN 3'94p v'.': .F mEDm mmP DW COMO SIDEWA 25 OJ041529 2SAB ~ 0 TY STR I TmE C R O 6 II I I•~,e.- L ,?i %IST 20.5 iC 20,52 Y Contractors shall verify all field eC 24AD TC 24.0 NO ENTRY RAMf~ M 24.0 rsDm M B 23.65 C 2136 WPE I C 20.64 condhions and dimensions antl ,r ' - rc WHI LINE 6 23.65 m PROMS C 22,91 n OBC 20,43 LOT TURN PIIOPoSED •1q shall be responsible for field lh and I) i~e quality of work. No allowances I DOL YELLOW LI 26.16 ~pL /e, L 6NN VED Wq Tj E 20.57 i0 PUBLIC t• Y V WATER MAIN LINE NEW'ELDDR) - _ 2LZa - NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, shall be made on behalf of the x C WHITE LINE M AI (WIDTH VARIES) ~ IPA' clmssalK m sE v-r - NANTUCKET 4 VARIES) NANTUCKET 5NLE WITH Contractor for anyerror or neglect % y~ 'x 24,9fi -f-` 26.92 x m ~ N L 1 (5. R. 25) X MAX r9 ..WNJ4.plE 3.2 uxES o uDX PRECAST CC PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. on his part. SEAL NHITE LINE 2a.2e _ 2404 23.26 REMOVE EXIST, N W Q REPLACE NTH TH NEW. W. NEW SIDEWALK TO MATCH E OWL ElLO LIN TO MEET EXISTING ADJACENT RAMP TO MATCH BUILDING x ~ TURNING LANE RUSH k UEVEL. LEVEL. REFER cw+c. PLANTERSIARJ G SIpEWAUf DETAILS. (SP-5 5 NYSOOi) SIDE OF 51G - PLANTER AREAS ON EACH Project' DBL YELLOW LINE 0 J~ L OW NE 21,53 - EACH) SIDE OF 51GNAGE (G'-4" z 8" EACH) .4 %20.45 Ar 26.23 26.03 WHI (NY50oT R,O,W,) NEW'ELDORW - NIW'ELDORADO'STONE, OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, INC. 26.26 iC 26.31 TO 26.09 TO 25.95 24'43 BC 25a9 6C 25.56 BC 25.54 24'43 MITE LI (ROUTE 25) 7 _ NANTUCKET NANTUCKET 57YLE 320 FROST POND ROAD 5 CONC C 6•I BTc 25,32 C 2957 TC 2453 C 26.16 BC 24M TO 2453 (VARIABLE WIDTH) - T - - BC 24.06 I OLD BROOKVILLE,NY `tUP -0,UP O 0 J PRECAST CC -PRECAST CONCRETE CAP PROJECT: ?-ELEVEN, INC. 1 3 ?010 STOP LINE NOTE WX,RS, •IW LEN TUNX•MON PLACED TEm unrorPSmNEn, PURSUnNrro sovraaLO TOW CO ss - - - - OOND or."a=i61•°•°""•.:" '•ir 100-254(n ACRNO TTM.K,,R OLLU rIONmoe~ v - MEW 2 1/4" THICK WOOD MAIN RD. & FACTORY ~O GC THERE ARE NO URB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE APPRO"AL 6EEP J NEW 2 ACC .(sse ooRmmoN oN ~ PANEL- WHIT PANEL- WHITE- WITH CARVED AVENUE U ADJACENT P PERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE LANE 7-1 1 SIGMA PLBASE 422,16 JJL" 7-1 1 51GNAGE WITHIN MATTITUCK, NY pi2aB sInNA °"I I I WOOD STREET SIGN W/ Iff"V APPROVEDBY SENECK FIXTURE J W/ SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP FOR WORK ON STATE HIGHWAY AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROADWAY DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25" BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. wTI~ O OLDPLANM 1000 142 01 27 A'1 ' \ o8 . Tnoluzeo slcNATUaa Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. I SITE PLAN TE: The approved site development plan shall he valid IN period of three (3) years from the date of approval as par' SP-1 SCALE:1"=20'-0" code section 100-255. 16 ~ e Scale: AS NOTED I ALL SITE INFORMAEON IS BASED UPON A SURVEY DATED 02/16/06• JOB NO, OBDt3, BY. ~YOCLM11PfI At BRUSH EXOHELMIt-LWD TIAIYWO OM NEX'XL SP-1 Drawn by: M.C. ddOV.11Vn1'iwa N~,n I II it II 1i 111 I LANDSCAPING NOTES: KEMPEY ENGI N ING 1. COVERALL PLANTING BEDS WITH A MINIMUM OF 2" THICKNESS OF HARDWOOD MULCH. 2. AT PLANTING BEDS IN PARKING AREAS AND AREAS OF REQUIRED TRAFFIC VISIBILITY USE LOW PROFILE PLANTINGS. LNTINGS. III EER ~ Y Rpm lrni~ ~ 1 13 ,-I ...Ymoc n Ike Y. 3. DURING LOCAL GROWING SEASON, OWNER SHALL PURCHASE AND PLANT ANNUAL FLOWERING PLANTS AS REQUIRED IN PLA MQURED IN PLANTING BEDS TIP I'I'I ceA1R OF STAKIbc TZ CLOSE GAPS IN PLANTING AREAS AND TO ADD COLOR AND VARIETY TO LANDSCAPING. fd1~1.V A.1 11 `I Ir 1"'~'.n.~~R1! 640 SUNRISE HIGH 1NAY MYHC•..1 lllyyg[~~,~~ N I' 11r YYYY wID illY9lut Pi =Ia. ¢INS L17~TIA 1 I I % ~,m 4. PROVIDE NEW IN-GROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT ALL SEAS OF LANDSCAPING AS REQUIRED BY CODE. ~ ~ ..nMyl.oYgnY 1 11 ;~i • 5. STREET TREES. STREET TREES WITH AMIIMUM CALIPER OF FOUR INCHES SHALL BE PLANTED AND/OR MAINTAINED ADJAC WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 NTAINED ADIACENT TO ALL I : Y 1 I ROAD FRONTAGES IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 30 FEET ON CENTER P: 631.321.7777 ;I , I I 1 [ AMENDED 2-10-2004, EFFECTIVE 3-1-20041 ~uio-ITilk..~.• ~ ~ ~ ,~unwc y~,~,~ € I I €~-.-,,,...'.•-n:c~...,~.__...~1~ aroma S`5r ~~I ~I•_ 6. PARKING AREA SCREENING. ALL PARKING AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH A HEDGE, BERM AND/ORDECORAT ND/ORDECORATIVE WALL OR F: 631.661.0486 I,II FENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS. ~L pR!d'Yl] • 1 FIM y ~ I 1 1 ~ !...Nnillll lY4 n € 1T I 7. DECORATIVE OFF-STREET PARKING LOT LIGHTS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE : ~ LH~Ia I.Ff Fid 1111 E PLAWWO TREE KNUIRI IT oYu'lluvT NFLS 1y.~~Ipeyyryry YrAA;MY ONES INNER SPECIATESI 8. OFF-STREET PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE NONADJUSTABLE HORIZONTALLY MOUNTED FIXTURES WITH LESS TH NINETY-DEGREE LUMINATRE CUTOFF. 3S WITH LESS THAN EAST' NORTHPORT,''I NY 11731, ala FIXTURES THAT PROJECT LIGHT OR GLARE TOWARD THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ADJONNOPROPERTIESSHALL NOT BE P ISEIALL NOT BE PERNHTTED. P. 631.368.3324 aattM!'fVEi....._._ •1 ` aiYkli IYlW4n~~ r WAlL 1Nl[ WIT; 9. PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ALONG PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS ANI WALKWAYS AND ALLEYWAYS. F. 631.368.1524 A::Iri6 4~~. WL IM,~ I~ ~q ~ n Y Yi.. • . + f 1 11 R-tl 1YI IYYn YY1C~- 10. BUILDING-MOUNTED LIGHTFDn`URES SHALL BE FOR SAFETY OR SIONAGE PURPOSES ONLYAND MUSTDIRECT LIGHT DOWN CT LIGHT DOWNWARD. F IYM.YI ' r WALI.PACKLIGHTS OR OTHERLIGHTNG THAT SHINES OUTWARD TOWARD ADJOINING PROPERTIES OR THE STREET RIGHT{ SHALL BE PROHIBITED. SHIELDING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO AVOID LIGHT TRESPASS AND GLARE. STREET RTGHT-0F•WAY REVISIONS: ELGrATED x'PhiSFE ~ ,~al..._.... 11. DECORATIVE STREETLIGHTS OF NOT MORE THAN 12 FEET IN HEIGHT SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED, INSTALLED AND LIED AND Date Description No. Im.nxn hrttF al RAPE~ .fi 'm°a-•-' ,IalauLm nn ""'1"'nCJ9e_n__,____,--- BF SRPoA +LtNT7Y1; ~ 6ul LL MANTANEDSTTUATED IN SIDEWALK CUTOUTS EVERY 30 FEET ON CENTER ALONG TIE SITE'S FRONTAGE. THE SAME LIGHTING FIXTURE SHALL BE APPLIED TO EACH MAIN STREET BUSINESS I REST BUSINESS DISTRICT. V.- ; ~ nn~.Ywmw ~La _ I~ ~ ~g~I~,, g;,,~ I..~ &`seYu+mYr' 11] I-11-'L'~~n :~`i 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS, FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. a m _I AREA OF NATURAL VEGETATION THAT IS AFFECTED BY NEW SANITARY WORK 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD . COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 i 1 ileaYW! I OUML / SHALL BE LANDSCAPED FOLLOWING NEW N/F TANK INSTALLATION. REASONABLE CARE MATFTUCK PLAZA LLC ~ ~ 1%k- nNe Pi1IrI 4 IS TO BE TAKEN IN REMOVING EKISFNG TREES k SHRUBS WITH THE INIENFON ~ 1- 4\ F~ 1 a / OF SALVAGING AND RE-TRANSPLANIING 10.73 OF SAME. BC 10.3E 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD • ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 / RETAINING USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER WALL ALONG NORTHERLY z LL13 R P N LIN A 5 P HALT PARKING 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD / SAVE ENOUGH EXISTING 4ECITATON COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 PART PLAMWNT 49 SL9PE 1+ ( r:l." . Sk mla WA Y YmI +I. Mm nltt,. ~IyM: TSEf. PIJRTSS I.l. Tll L rY•1 n ME FENCE ASEREOURIREDETO CREE / 'IT0 ME REAR OF ME BUILDING. 146.00 N 48 11/12/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD / IXIST.i~ - CMTE y COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 T{' NEW FEATURING AS @® UIR TO INFILL EXISTING NATURAL VECET ION DIS / MLDISTURBE BED NATURAL LANDSCAPESCBEDULE ® ~ "AF VECIT TON. I _,,Aj 12/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 12/07/10 KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMONNAME SIZE QUANTITY SEWER EUEC lO PICEARUBENS RED SPRUCE 4"mld W.. 12 METER METER 4.- MIN. AS O2 CUPRESSOCYPARTS * LRYLORD CYPRESS 30"dit 35 A Ab @0 IV L_ J L_ ® BE6=ECTION BUFFER 2a LIST OF DRAWINGS: O LEUCOTHOE RACEMOSA SWEEPRELL LE000THOE 4WH 13 LI J s I(, PEROTOWN CO ESSECPTIONU2E0-a S. PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SIF (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA- 2275 S.F.) / / @ @ @ 0 PROP. STACKED 0 SEE Sheet Description Oq TRUJA OCCIDENTALIS NIGRA AMERICAN ARBORVITAE 7'H 47 _ _ _ m I W r ® y~/, L/./ RETUNING WAU- SEE OEI. ON SP-3 -3 5 JUNIPERUSCHU41NSIS O GOLD COAST JUNIPER IS"da. 183 P N l @@ ® ' LIME A EA a' W Lo SP-1 KEY MAP -SITE PLAN ALL EXISTING LANDSCAP13TO REMAIN J @ @ ~WA R ~r N -PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 7 EUONYMUSALATUS y WINGED EUONYM08 3'-5'H 10 S ULMUS AMERICANA "VALLEY FORGH" AMERICAN ELM "VALLEY POROE" 21R" mi.. cLL 5 PMKN40NPOYEE. 2) 2) SC 22.8 685 F. PR POSE ADDITION ~`Tj T/ / A A L T E -SANITARY CALCULATIONS ALT PARKING -ZONI G !ANALYSIS I SP-2 LANDSCAPE PLAN -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE ` O 8 NYTIS ®IL~ ® - ,,N Q7 I it I I ry -LANDSCAPE NOTES 2`-6" SP-3 -SITE DETAIL d Sgw ® ® _ _ _ TAN T-31 GUARDRAIL WITH W5.0.5 POST EVERY W-3 O.C, DRAIL WITH W5.0.5 61-3. O.Cl '-0 MIN. LANDSCAPE BUFFER ® ® ° @® } EXIST. FUEL KSOO a 4 D SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN " AN IANDSCME BUFFER AS CODE SECTION 260-55. 1'-0 " 1'-C~ EXIST, O 'd m . • ® @ TO BE REMOV PER -TOWN LODE SECTION 280-9 , DIAN. SCHEDULE K BUILDING ® P, I GA$ PUM ISLANDI u PROPOSED 1" DIAN. SCHED o, * COPPER WATER SERVICE ore ^ @ ® TO I E R MOVED 'ATE R SERVICE SP-6 .AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY m 3 I ! I ~ PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO 20.02 A-1! -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS em $w f,~' ®•®i:~INV T.%® TO 20.02 / .,~YZ• _ rk~' j +N C.UM(.I\L IL f 4U q 11 BE_ EIl D ® lE II A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS TO 20.40 II D S IS C T-ELEVEN" - - _ I I ese p ens1, are an In strum o OP [Njj DE IVE Y service and are the property of the Engineer, Infringements will he C 26 55 REV C 265A 21' '•_l !X Gfl,AS$/ TOP SOIL V A p4 G ' BAI5i.6" BUSH BE%IBi.6" 8V196 O u 0 sEEOIN '-F Cl J -W ® ® ® o EXIST.6" BUS rc¢m s prosecuted. of e ® EXIST. SIM J.` F~• •••-••.'...L-..A A d016 E),ST. LE NARKI w ^.E TO 21.01 DOST. SON rvl I•F 'I•. ,r I y ILE MARKER Contractors shall verify all geld I' t5p r, " I~ TO 2e.55 T R U K S. °~fiz l0 6C 2fi.23 yNE W~CON,F. 51?EW'ni~,. ep S's %,ayau ~U.•,4:1: ".,,.2e •t0 TC 22.SJ fo BUSH 2 I LE A II . n (^`ci~S..l:~ y (~+'r,Gl'TNYC rNk~)• VIII SIOEW 25 0704 1529 X~ N conditions and dimensions and I n l~ u yo;,;; REV N N ^ EXIST. SIC NEW TURF U TY STR ,UPSY}i J C R O S S W A L K W C., V ti - T BC 24.110 NO ENTRY VIII iPti • .LG;.i.;, ,K RAWD C iC 20..0) Est f' Klsr ° TC 20.82 shall be responsible for field fit and ..S• RAMrY~ quality of work. No allowances = < WHITE UNE BC 2].69 BC 22.92 OBC 21 C 20.84 shall be made on behalf of the 0 ec 20.u To PUBLIC Contractorf4ranyerroror neglect EENTRANCE y~ O6L YELLOW U TE m WHITE UM ~ W~ W WATER MAIN> on his part. SEAL SIN N oa WHITE LINE Al (WIDTH VARIES) R I 1 AD (S R• 25) N3N 0 N S R. Z5 MITE LINE Project c ~ iU R N I N G L OBL 0 UN ANE OBL YELLOW UNE OWNER: GAMA_DEERI PARK, INC. L YE OW E g.. 9.. Ti - WHITE I 320 FROST POND ROAD IN (NYSQOT R.Q.W.) OLD BROOKV!LLE NY';. (ROUTE 25) ' III 3 _0 c 26.15 BC 2589 C 25.09 BC 15,54 CU BC 24.92 26.16 ,09 (VARIABLE WIDTH) PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. _ ~UP IP %UP 0 O C 24 I STOP LINE NOTE; MAIN RD. & FACTORY, JOLT AVENUE G( THERE ARE N (HERE ARE NO URB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE qrf d F MATTITUCK,1 NY, U ADJACENT P >DJACENT P ERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE LANE II,~ Q SUFFOLK COUNTY'TAXII, MAP 2 SIGNAGE DETAIL FOR WORK ON STATE HIGHWAY AND DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT SP-2 L' v TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROADWAY APPRO 4,1 100,0 142 01I 27 SCALE: 1 1/2 " =1 '-0" IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25" PLANNING BOARD _ BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. TOWN OF SOIDTHOLD 4.6 DERIVED FROM: STANDARD HIGHWAY p Date: 02.25.09 drrawing no. ~V 1 11 SIGNS & MARKINGS BOOK, 2004 Bc 1 L N SC E PLAN DATE MUTCD 2009 P- SCALE: 1" =201-0" ALL TE INFO V L G A SUR BATEO C ALL TE INFORMATION IS BASED UPON Scale:, I AS (VOTED ( A SUR OATEU 02/15/06. JOB NO. 06013. OT: o f - uott~~~ ?OLIwMo~lxmMr: wow R5-7 SIMILAR IV P Awd SW MY[!oM 11£wE 'w Drawn by: M.C. Ili I II ; .I ; I ~'I I ~I I I I I I. I i i~up'wz~ nv.Ny a Planting in accordance with KEMPEY ENGINEERING ...:asr *rw Sect. VII, Landscaping, Table w za e.wo.um 'Al - 3. w•r ~eumpsr 1-1/a 'blab 0sbconc. -BumPe PROVIDE STEEL CAP v.nlaal v41y1 rbb 26' Co... slab (see block fence all hl9hlrlbdona. Block fence all Inum,wng Ydp soy. ote 1) 40001b. _ arauntl. en•ww 25 day strength around. b" DO, STEEL BOLLARD a^M~r M1-L 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY 6-0" LONG NG FILLED 90LJD WITH CONCRETE, PRUM INDUSTRIAL TYPICAL CONC. I gypped N~1 4013)'gmae6"w-im, AND PAINT (2) COATS x STREET REPAIR CURB GUTTER 4M mesh with 3' cower 3" Gate Port WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 (type) 't. put " ( P: 631.321.7777 TOP OPE PO ASPHALT SLATTED FABRIC DETAIL 1. clamp. PATCH AS REQT1 (OR .0. Mine raw. TOP OF NEW SLAB) ! wb a•mcal vinyl 1-1/2' • Top mil x .mb TYPICAL CONCRETE CURB twl, PLAN LF0 1 F: 631.661.0486 &14r pm a -t/T • um poa GUTTER & STREET REPAIR NOTESi farm, m, w4 -Vz•. eraa. 1. - Length and width to be determined by the architect or engineer as necessitated by the needs of the site. The size is ne arahfte°° or 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE ite. ma SIZG I6 s• uuI x Tear l.d pnY I II/x'e Main p v, tnn "nYm NnWa9. I. subject to the approval of the Town Engineer & Planning board, umP.r a rap.'ry W. A. FmWnx - Wad. 1.1''a1o~,wNYa nTr' i Planning hoard' EAST NORTHPORT,' NY 11731 14" DIM x 3'-0" DEEP ID• d . 4000 Ib, ze rrme.ew.e.s ,.IMa P. 631.368.3324 POURED CONIC, POOTINO day stao by LlpMUraL~l T4W 3000 PAL CONCRETE F. 631.368.1524 edeywre.s, INDUSTRIAL STANDARD REVISIONS: STREET REPAIR CURB tv-v Date Description No. TYPICAL STREET CURBS I sr.,_ GATES STREET REPAIR DETAIL 4/13/09 ! REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. DETAIL 3 r4~ REFUSE ENCLOSURE DETAIL IL 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 1 TWCIAL BOLLARD DETAIL 2 BUFFER FENCE AND PLANTING DETAIL SP-3 NTS SI' 3 SCALE: 2' = COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 SP-3 SCALE: 1" =1t-0" SP-3 SCALE: s' =1t-OR 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 NOTES: 11/12/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD +rw.F inmdl.. znW W amw.owrwwr 1. - Depth of storage to be based on distance between I COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 eWO.WUanama lowest invert & bottom ofstruclure. II ae.ra a,uan•w. Dhabillly Curb Cut /xmw.~mu~i1tlW"°eW 2. - All structures, as to be raised to final grade using appropriate solid or slotted saver- Sae Section Vf, far 34 Sumw CL applications. 12/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 12/07/10 II I wWwm•.w~s SPECIFICATIONS: A ~pP A POLE STYLE: METROPOLITAN UTTAX II 0na~ YY. sum . RASE-. NOM. S 1/1" BOLT CIRCIE IN 9" 58. 13114"DIAM, BASBCOV RSQUA CMCI.EIN 9" SQUARE LIST OF DRAWINGS: HANDICAPPED wide .lN¢• 0 -..m ANCHO L BASE COVER 0 Aa' 6'-0 ~~~969e S E-. 12'-l0" lie ANCHOABOLTS: (4) 3/4" X 30" WITH3 3"H00] rr]°0 FULLY ALVANIZZIID. X 39" WITH Y HDOY, o.c. ~ unto °a' ua..o e., .WWWw MATERIAL: 4" OIAK ALUM. POLE SHAFT. 1 ARM ASSEMBLY Y IS IS FABRICATED ALU NO T gPI UM. POLE SHAFT. RENT Sheet Description pW MIwW TUBING WITH A MIM FTSET %M °FrITERM EEL -KEY MAP SITE PLAN IN PLACE WITH (3) STALUbB3) STAINLESS STEPL SET SCREWS. NLESS S= SET SP-1 -PARKING CALCULATIONS PMKIND O FINISH TGIC :LAC POLYESTER POWDER COATB PLAN MAGNLUMI (BLACK R POWDER COAT IN -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS TrAN-Y -SANITARY CALCULATIONS HANDICAPPED SIGN O LUMINAIl2E: METROPOLTAN-2 I N balckgeround MAJOR TREE PLANTING BED ZONING ANALYSIS 1,41d. Elu• ABow ]"®olunlmlred7udmem Pmma&Onle •PfacWml I I Na6S4-I)oroppmwedea" O 1Q] ym InbmOaanal p•_D• .1 for ymb0 ithadd d wag \ (max e beawdW edd H-2O 20 food SadwlW as o SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN smea0m smn e•-o• e•-D• Pee.miellny b •LANDSCAPESCHEDULE a -LANDSCAPE NOTES pp.d SWII TRAFFIC FLO rvmvue~~~F~~ 4p.~ a Handicapped WIEe . rip. ( Te ..UItYYi~bbpwih~ln-wN ~p W~ my~ Raofdrdn-6•plpeweda-u- .Los pte 1) VLUnp JV.aq.nYWY- ooomarlae babsombaelae-12"pipe mW®m- P,V.C.orCoaeSebdMemt g 12 Maximum 3 SP-3 SITE DETAIL 40001.-29dWs wroweasele variable diameter p a 1j44" SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN OO IeXYJI 4YwMUY WYd611 PacldW wIW clean yu®ISCanledd - 1'4•0moundt infarfdidsp6t NOTE: p a" wlde "lrl O 1. -Far be way lra - n.t. ) SP-61 AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY Far arm to Dt yellow. TRAFFIC FLOW O nOle i For pne way wlic• a•.a"9mymm eeWx imneior.d eINPPin9 td b. • wNL. AllploWC OrP.V.C. piperobo BBA)$. PH-1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 2'-0• Mtn Gropndwdm A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS SECTION A-A I A 7 i .FA QT AXM% Q71CIQT T7T VITA TTl%ATQ hown hvean) 7 ON S1'1'P S'1'OKM I)FA-LNAGL FOOL g LIGHT POLE DETAIL ~L-(~ LAV 1 Al\L •I LV1 LLL IAl1V1Y l) 5 STRIPING DETAIL 6 MINOR TREE ( Same m for MAjor Tree moept m shown he n) I SP-3 SCALE: I,, =1i-oO SP-3 SCALE: 14" = P-0M SP-3 NTS SP-3 SCALE: q' = II-0" These plans are an instrument of service and are the property of the Engineer. Infringements will be ~~rFW y''r pmsecule4. APPROVED BY III^^^ I V n~ y,. Contractors shall verity all field PLANNING BOARD conditions and dimensions and ' ) 1 °r' + J shall be responsible for field fit and quality of work. No allowances 20 12 O 0 shall be made on behalf of the ,wi.~s.er ~~.ew 1 1L~~Pm,xw®u.e. DATE PACT PARKING Contractor'for anyerror or neglect on his part, SEAL. 00 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD nn 00 P Project 7-31 GALV, METAL GUARDRAIL SYSTEM W/ OWNER: GAMA_DEER PARK, INC. Counter Slope of Surfaces Adjacent to Curb Ramps W6xB.5 POST 0 6'-3" m 320 FROST POND ROAD NTS CASTmONFAAME O.C. COPING STONE TOP SOIL OLD BROOKVILLE,NY AAID COVERTOGRAME DH CAST IRON COVERS V_a. e PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. s 'HBD.OBADH FINISTDED DRADB ]w w n' 21W.- 8"H x BWW x IB"L r. PROP. CONC. CURB 3 Lolll x.' rw~ TRAFFIC SLAB za'^r:;,r; m' STACKED RETAINING MAIN RD. & FACTORY STONE WALL .i PROP, ASPHALT AVENUE TRAFFIC SLAB xo' xo' b i INLHT MIN. 4" DIAM SDR35 OUTLET GEOGRID EVERY -II =S STONE CRUSH CLEAR MATTITUCK, NY FROM 1QTCIE N - .E UN. 4" PTTCNED 1/4";1' TO SEFrTC TANK PVC PIPE OR xww= 1 1; - MIN.4"DTAM SDR35 Sao 2'-0" VERTICALLY O.C. - TO SEPTIC TANK T ERISTNG SITE SOIL MEd. 4" DIAM PTT Med. 4 EQUIVALENT PI'I'L'IED PIPE OR EQUIVALENT ' n I - " DIAM PTT CHeD ; EXIST. - - 1/8"Y 1/8":p 1/4 4":1' < - PITCDEn 1/8'51' RETAINING WALL ON TOP SOIL - 16" DIAM, x V-9" DEEP SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP ADJACENT - - 3000EP.5.1. CONCRETED DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT PROPERTY - + MONOLITHIC DIAMETER MAX. HT. GAL./FT. FILTER FABRIC 1000 142 01 27 HT GAL./FI'. -MONOLITHIC D hTA7C. REINFORCED SOIL B' S' 308 Tm s soo LO' 6' 500 - o - -I ~ IT r goo Iz' T 900 ' +i _ _ _ e'-o• MIN, 11 EU I I I ml l lm 111-1 1 mI I I m11 1Y-0' xux. STONE RUSH CLEAR Date: 02.25 09 drawing no. e'-e' MIN. _ Iz'-o" mm. 11 TYPICAL GREASE TRAP 1z STACKED WALL & GUARDRAIL DET TAIL DETAII, Scale: AS NOTED SP1111111113 9 SIDES OF CURB RAMPS 1o CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK 5P-3 SCALE: 41'.0" SP-3 SCALE: 1 =11-0" SP-3 SCALE: z" =1'-0" SP-3 SCALE: Z' =1'-0" Drawn by M.C. I I i KEMPEY ENGINEERING h ry. , 0 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY ~V U WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 hUZ4,i hm Q h hU U P: 631.321.7777 C~ U QQ~ 4i O ~ y Q) ~ F: 631.661.0486 [O ~ J~m2 ~ p GJ c~ ~hv N C) 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE V7 O r i t`u~o`S~ m U EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 h ~ P. 631.368.3324 ~O am" 26.17 F. 631.368.1524 V 1°0 ?6.1 3 REVISIONS: D mn~ Y~w4r ^m ~Q NN 4- PROP. ELEVATED Um "02 "7-ELEVEN" SIGN Date Description No. 4/13109 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS m' o SEE DETAIL N FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. STOP n f h Y AREA OF NATURAL VEGETATION THAT IS AFFECTED BY NEW SANITARY WORK SHALL BE ING P5 gg 249 SQ.FT. DEDICATION / W SHALL BE LANDSCAPED FOLLOWING NEW N/F TANK INSTALLATION. . R REASONABLE CARE MATTIlICK PLAZA LLC 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 1\ h FOR FUTURE TURNING ~U N, RADIUS IMPROVEMENTS TO BE TAKEN IN REMOVING EXISING T1EES k SHRUBS 1HE INTENTION . hC~ OF SALVAGING AND RE RE-TRANSPLANTING TO 13,33 / of sAME. ac lsaz STOP N tiNC(V 26.15 _ 9 EXISTING 6" CONCRETE ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 0) - X'2b. _ RETAINING USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER WALL ALONG NORTHERLY COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 m h 26.00 ° 5 PROPERTY LINE U9 A S P H A L T P A R K I N G / UL13 SAVE ENOUGH EXISTING VEGITATION AND ADD MORE EVERGREENS S ALONG 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD / n0 1HE FENCE AS REQUIRED SCREEN COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 BC 25.65 X 25.95 ° / N hiE REAP OF THE OU BUI WI ffIING, 146.00 N 48'57'30" E GRATE 11/12/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD TC 26.10 X X / NEW REQUIRED TO C AS COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 j EXIST, A' - TO INFILL EXISTING NATURAL VEGEi ION NAIRAL DISTURBED VECIT HON. 12/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 26.95 25.39/ / 0 ® SEWER ELEC. COMMENTS DATED 12/07/10 A METER METER V--~ ® -5 FOR WORK ON STATE HIGHWAY AND 1~ _0 4 / "-LAW R~ 0 J R TOWN CODE LANDSCAPE SECTOR 250 O PE PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SF 0 L ~ LIST OF DRAWINGS: TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROADWAY e / Y 1 (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA- 2275 S.F.) / ® ® ~@ IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25" If I ' W r / PROP. G WKALL SEE Sheet Description BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. / / ~F h l W pR -W ;fi Off. ON SP-3 SP-1 KEY MAP SITE PLAN DETAIL OF CORNER RADIUS = Jp L n -PARKING CALCULATIONS SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" a/ POLE MOUNTE -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SIGNAGE EMPLOYEE SANITARY CALCULATIONS BC 24.81 >V\ 685 SF. PR POSED ADDITION f /L - - PARKING ONLY ADS P2H A L i P A R K I N C BC 22.81 ZONING ANALYSIS ,rW a 1~~ SP-2 LANDSCAPEPLAN # Q Nrv NY Nrv ` NY 14 0 ® I rv -LANDSCAPESCHEDULE LANDSCAPE NOTES ~iW ~ s ® ® 4 j T-31 GUARDRAIL W3YOA 0 0 POST EVERY 6'-3' D. C. SP-3 -SITE DETAIL a~ : u A D, J EXIST. FU TANKS O 6 B-0' MIN. LANDSCAPE BUFFER AS EXIST. ' E PER TOWN CODE SECTION 200-95. 0 SP-4 I'1 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN BUILDING O ` v F® ® I GA$ PUM ISL TO B R MOV * I TO E R M D .4 PROPOSED 1" OIPM. SCHEDULE K 6 COPPER WATER SERVICE SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY Q) a :w PH-11, -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO 20.02 $ _RN n 'm 'co A-1 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS I PROP. 7-ELEVEN A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS IG SIGN "yp~~ STOP - {1J fin' ®.e<' tf~ ~~.MS1 ~ w ~ ~ om \ Tc zo.4o These plans are an Instrument of WOW fs service and are the property of the ®e~o ®o ®®o , "o Engineer. Infringements will be C 28,58 • ',I'j GRASf . ''C GRASS/ c5 '3ou ALT 6" BUSH i.PS~WST,O ~~VI O m, IS •i'Y. NO SEEDIN _W J prosecuted. 3r 1 i ~ m,f I ~r IContractors shell verity all field BC ze r• Y• ® :R' o' o e 30' o.o ® P ] ' o o ® IST.3" BUS F OXEO U TC 26.7 TC .58 FYJST. SIGN TC 21.01 ~•ii'.k:•: .M i~N~W,'Zdu¢ S MILE MARKER conditions and dimensions and I IF) io W'T U: 5 EXIST. ~ .~M1;w~,FC•.-F, yl., iC 2 Sl ID" BOSH .f iAg: i~i . ~i'n b '~A.1~1 'i~F y {jYTS;M~ •s:; 25 0704 1529 shall be responsible for field fit and 'n 1 8C 28.23 ^ EXIST. 51 NEW TU I UTILItt Sifl V ' IIIII W GONG SIDEWA q 0 S 5 W A L}A„ ;y+¢• r OV TO 20.32 CON D R IIIIIII y quality of work. No allowances I ~'r IAy~{a 1 BC 24,613 TC p, T O Y ' RAMfL7 shall be made on behalf of the ~ m rc WHITE LI BC 2365 C 23,36 C 20.34 ONE Bc 22.02 A ®BC 20,43 Contractor for anyenor or neglect C on his part. m OBL YELLOW L E TO PUBLIC m d WHITE LINE WHTE W- WATER MAIN u ° I LINE I• 1 A I ( IOTN VARIES) -ROAD /S.. . Project ` IT I WHITE LIN NVL i U R N I N C OBL 0 LIN ~ LANE OWNER: GAMA_DEER PARK, C - 2 VOL YELLOW LINE INC. E OW E 320 FROST POND ROAD TC 28.31 TC 28.09 TO 2505 - WHITE LINE (NYSDOT R,O,W) OLD BROOKVILLE,NY BC 25.89 B 25.58 BC 25.54 GONG CURB GONG CURB C 24.8) (ROUTE 25) TC 2153 (VARIABLE WIDTH) BC 24.06 Ip 6 I ~C P26.16 O UP 0 Eli I I' L PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. STOP LINE NOTE APPROVED BY MAIN RD. & FACTORY ~ GC THERE ARE NO CU CUTS (RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENG ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE r ~v APP AVENUE 441 ADJACENT PRO RTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLE 1. AND MARLENE LANE = PLAN PLANNING BOARD MATTITUCK, NY ITV W Q TOWN TOWN OF sourHOw SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP ~~C9 FOR WORK ON STATE HIC STATE IHGHWAY DATE DATE C) _C0 11 TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE WR ~I,S, SEE "ROADWAY DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT = IMPROVEMENT PLANS FC C PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25" 1000 142 01 27 Q BY DUNN ENGINEERING) NEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. 1 TRUCK ROUTE PLAN V ~V P4 SCALE: 1 " = 201-0" (TRUCK PATHS SHOWN REPRESENT ALL SITE INF( ALL aM INFORMATION A A aJRYEY BATED J OR N0, 06013, BT: a2/10/06, I R NO UPON Scale: AS NOTED SPl11111111114 WB-50 DESIGN VEHICLE) SURVEY l GATED Vol mu ~VOLLM d' IAU N=EGIXO-L D LT MY u 30l RYE 19M AKXXE pA4 NNyXY. O9 Drawn by: M.C. KEMPEY ENGINEERING 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 P: 631.321.7777 F: 631.661.0486 C 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE J EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 P. 631.368.3324 po" F. 631.368.1524 REVISIONS: 4~f . .f NOD, 161 1 r ~ul f L^~'S~~ NNl J n~ 11 Date Description No. L ~N ~'{yry7il! i pN All, ~~g4'4`q~f4W ibS_4}YBLti 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF 4 1 1, SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. P ~ V, lit ' T"t 'IM 1 A V d N u i~ P ~I' Tr .'A410 ff,~i 'tik 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD F f COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 xuf stir, oo 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD k ~ COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 Y rr ff1, x e \ ~ 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD ,AI COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 61 11/12/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD ol~ COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 ilk ,r' , PIP L:f 12/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 12/07/10 POP- yS; I ~IpV I,IO. N Nf a ~,4Y Wit t, LIST OF DRAWINGS: Zia a ' W. err, 11 Sheet Description VI, Alf !1 = 37~ ieb ~ - J` .~r+' b Y'^ n M' 2r. , SP-1 KEY MAP SITE PLAN -PARKING CALCULATIONS v c 4 m A'~'ju n h -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS AdW P Y ^~ry4 V-' -SANITARY CALCULATIONS ZONING ANALYSIS s m tx :¢n a° rt T` r o- $ 'tie W I g e-fM~~. 'ky ME", rrr888 Ay y yi,'.~p n rf 'r ~r~ r '1W e ° 1 ? V t~~ If f i ur w SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN _ ~ mix" ' -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE 1 1, 114 1 1 j, r V, ' tlA qA ~ k -LANDSCAPE NOTES III; fl, d Rr"I I9 N I ~ i, MCI 1'r SP-3 -SITE DETAIL ~,~4~y' Arai rm 4 Nr,t4lri, qiM „iy~ IM1k jt. Ile, fi TF SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN a ••I Rk~~ w s ~ r N ^ 141 rµya~ ~w ~ a<,?n ~ 5 v a~ ..y " rvmn r' a ff o fb Y' Ile t' SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY PH-1: -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN . a 1 ~ A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS fin", 4i~hl. l llb'117 4- ZI r, Cpl A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS Nr `I ~ sd These plans are an instrument of seNlce and are the property of the Engineer. Infringements will be '/~•'"r°,~, 1'r j prosecute . ~ ' ' QI~~ I s I ~ r si I {r~; Contractors shall verify all field conditions and dimensions and b «r pp'~ 7 shall be responsible for field fit and quality of work. No allowances y ~gT~4, "cap; n, shall be made on behalf of the • rr Contractor for anyerror or neglect ' on his pad. SEAL ,y ' ~,R - i III ! n Project f 4 "161 "tali OWNER: GAMA_DEER PARK, INC. 320 FROST POND ROAD L ~<d i OLD BROOKVILLE,NY PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. ':silo I I MAIN RD. & FACTORY I AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD '!I SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP TOWN OF SOUTHOLD; 3 DIST. SEC. BILK. LOT a DATE 1000 142 01 27 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. I SITE PLAN OVERLAY ON AERIAL PHOTO i P-( SCALE: I" = 40'-0" ALL SU IN ALL are INFCMMAWN IS BASED UPON Scale: AS NOTED A'RF DATED %III Voam A WFYEY DATED 02/16/08. JOB NO, OBOll, BY, a ~T R RUSH ~YOLLNON f1lMEEPoXFWIO IJ ME~NO SPl11111111111116 r AANUC Drawn by: M.C. rm I I ill Il I CP I ; I KEMPEY ENGINEERING Luminalre Schedule Project: All Projects Symbol 0ly Label Arrangement Lumens LLF Description 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY 4 Metro -2 SINGLE 6300 0.8 70 watt HIPS type 4 dietr WEST BABYLON, NY11704, 6 Metro -2 SINGLE 6300 018 70 watt HIPS type 4 distr with glare shields P: 631.321.7777 u 3 Pavillon-3 SINGLE 4D00 0.8 Wall light -full cutoff 50 watt HPS F: 6311.661.0486 3 Ceiling master SINGLE 6600 0.72 Ceiling light -full cutoff 70 watt MH 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EAST' NORTHPORT,I NY 11731 P. 63,1.368.3324 Luminalre Location Summary Numeric Summary F. 63,1.368.1524 Project: All Projects Project: All Projects REVISIONS: SegNo Label Z Label CalcType Units Avg Mo.. Min III ON~~N"4Y 1 Ceiling master 10 Parking Lot Illuminance Fc 2.02 10.4 0.0 Date Description No. 2 Calling master 10 Stray Light Illuminance Fc 0.05 0.6 0.0 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF+'1 3 Ceiling master 10 ¢m SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. I 4 Metro -2 10 Ken Greene u 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 5 Metro -2 10 MagniFlood Inc 7200 New Horizons Blvd 0.0 0.0/ 0,0 0. F .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 ° .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 6 Metro -2 10 North Amityville, NY 11701 T 631-226-1000 0.0 0. 0,0 C' o.0 0.1 "o.1 o.1 o 1 0.t 0.1 '0.1 'o.1 '0,1 '0,1 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0,0 '0.0 '0.0 'b.o 'CO 'DO 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 7 Metro -2 10 F 631-226-4444 E mall Kenny®magniflood.com COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 Lya 8 Metro -2 10 W ww.Magniflood.com Dote:2/8/2010 0 0.0~ .0 0. o o.1 'o.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.z 0.2 10. 2 10. 2 10. 2 10. 1 0.t '0.1 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 '0,0 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 9 Metro -2 10 COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 146.00 0 10 Metro -2 10 0.0 .0 0.0 o ,1 0.1~N 0. 7 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 11/12/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 11 Metro -2 10 bJ b, bn P• P. 9. 9.1 9" 9. 1 9. 9 9.. 9. 9, 9. 9n L19% ba 0.i/0. 0.1 b. 1, 12 9, Sr 9J 1, 9a 9e PJ 0.1 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 12 Metro -2 10 12/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 13 Metro -2 10 , P. COMMENTS DATED 12/07/10 0.0 o b t 0.1 J J r 91 SEWER ELE , 0.2 0.1 10.0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1J bs y 1. zME GP 1. 9. 0.o 9. 0.. 14 Pavilion-3 15 9, 9o ba 9. . . 9, ' J 9, .e r Pr J I 15 Pavilion-3 15 It OA 'x/0.1 0.1 AL BUILDING AR r , 0,1 0.1 0,0 0.0 00 1 ° b, 9, 1, W '6r (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA= 2275 S.F.) LIST OF DRAWINGS: i 16 Pavilion-3 15 9.1 9, n 9, 9.. • ba 9 9, 9. 9 Sheet Description 0 T - % IIJ (p 0.2 0,1 0,0 0,0 0.0 0 0, 0,2 N 7. 9.r . bJ / \ .r~gA011~6/ 9J 9, L 9, 9 SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN 0.0 0,0 0 0.1 0,2 1 ar //qr 0,2 0.1 0,0 0,0 PARKING CALCULATIONS i DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 9~ 1. 0.0 o,o on °~J ro,a y~ P 685 0<I/1//0/IN y, %,k,,90,2 On 10. 0 10, 0 , 'SANITARY CALCULATIONS i e, °r'1 •M „ 1J t 9z P° 9,. P. 9° G 9n Pr .y 9i A./b/ -ZONING ANALYSIS 0 .0 ).0 J ,0 0 . °ao 4°.° °J. •.f.e u °u 9, I9 9,7 1. 0.2 0.1 0,0 0,0 J 1 SP_2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN a 3 LT REV 9u ° n ar 9, 1.• 9. 9 9. L P, a Pr 9 9. 9, % % a 9, 9J b LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE! 0.0 ``ee0.~ p Q NYT11 LD 0. 0•b bJ . Pr 9.. 9. 9~ 9 9• 0.. 0. P. L 0.. 9,e 9, 9. 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 -LANDSCAPE NOTES Q bJ ' 1,, 6r bn b, P• 9 0.r P. P. W 9, 9J 9. J SP-3 I -SITE DETAIL 0. 0, JQ0 2 0 1 y,, 1, 9.r 9° 1, b, BJ B, b, 4 0.. b 0.r n 0.r br M 0.r 9• 0.. 0. 0.. . 9Ip 0,2 0,1 0.0 OA 17 • 1, bs /hr bJ bJ ~ z b b, L b, 0. L bJ M L PJ bJ P. 0.. P. 9• 0.. 9n Pr 9w , SP-411 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN Ij g~.0 .(lO 0 f ),(lO 0 0. , ba bs P~ L 9, 6. 8.r 9z '4, bJ L bJ 9z ba bz bJ Ba Pz bJ Pz Pz P. 9s P• U. 1. gl' b (4.3 °0,1 °0.1 10,0 0,0 2 SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY. J r J~ ~'9J bn L 4, 9. P. b. P• 6, Pz 9u 'd, b, bJ 0.. b, P. 9a ba 9a b, P• 9n 9. Pr 4, 4r 9J b b. - / 0.0 ~ yW.O 3 0,1 0.1 0,0 0,0 0.0 y90•0 0 - , bn 1n 9. b b. 6r b. 9J L bJ b• b• P• bJ P, bJ P. Pr % 9o P• 9J P. 9 0. PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P> br Pn Pr bn . 9. 0.r bJ 0.• 0. 9 9i 9. 0.~ 9J x ~ b. c°Y ,iy.NI/fI 0 0 0. 0.0 = OA 9J L• b, U b 9. 9.. _ P 9J P. P, 0.. a 9, 9, 9 bM° P 0,1 0,1 0,0 0 0,0 A-1 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS 1 ` 1;1 , W. \ba b, u ba 94 S bs 9a S. 9x S S. 9s 9 U I S. 109, ba b - 9.i 9.0 9 0.0 0,0 o 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 `.0 A-2 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS 8.z bs bs yi 9a S 9x 5 v 9z L 9.. S So 91 9. 9 i 9, b 9.z 9 These plans am an Instrument of 9.z Sz 9n Sz Sz 9A Sr :~n b.' S Si b.. bs ba a 1n L 9u a ba S: Sz n Sr 9. E n'-i If. V!' service and are the property of the i I I i 0 0.0 o.a o.o ).0 0.0 0.4 0,1 0,0 0.0 .0 Engineer. Infringements will be W.N rr • bn . b. 9s 9s z 9a b. Sr S. 9., a 9a a. prosecute '•i i bo b,. bs 0x + 81 r,-7' o.a 0.0 0.0 b.o b.o i ).0 OA 0.0 9s •6 :r,• bx .z~ bs . b. bx Sz bn 9r Sz S. Sr a b.r z 9.r bA r0.1 0.0 0.0 .0 Contractors shall verify all field conditions and dimensions and ~ ':Y;;;gJ+;" N`tW'CdJ ' VI:. dOLE •I .+.`1..,',t.,y P. ,.;rr.i:•§:?.NYT3~4S .y shall be responsible for field fit and b.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 10,0 fl rury yYG W CO DEWAL16,0 0,0 ).O 0,0 P0.0 NEW IUgF UgLIT' S P jO'• C O 5 L K a 9a 9.z • h:, ~ 44?':" %IET quality of "rlc No allowances flX150 shall be made on behalf of the I~ _ WHIP L Contractor for anyerror or neglect 10.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 ].0 0,0 0.0 ~QI 0m 0.0 0,0 0.0 E O.IN 0.0 0. 0,3 0.4 ~ .0 on his partl SEAL DEL. YELLOW LINE - WHITE LINE 0.0 0.0 o,o 0.0 o.o 9 ).0 0,0 0,0 0.0 010 WH1 ONE ,q IDTN VA(tlEa) p 141SR 0, 0.1 0.1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 PS) Project) N WHITE LINE DEL Lld LIN OWNER: GAMA DEER'PARK, '0.0 o.o .o '10.0 ().o `10.0 o.0 b.o 0.0 o.o 4 ).0 0.0 0.0 0. U R 1 E N E 0.0 .D 0,0 0. D.0 .0 0, 0.1 .0 0, 0,0 .0 D,0 EEL YELLOW LINE INC. L Y OW E 3.0 0.0 0,0 ~p o.0 0,0 o.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 o.a o,o 0.0 320 FROST POND ROAD WHILE E c OLD BROOKVIL'LE,NY VIM L.1 %UP ~NP O O 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA OA Lim . 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 J 7-ELEVEN IN PROJECT. i , tl•I t~ 3 201D STOP UNE NOTE: MAIN RD. & FACTORY THERE ARE NO RB CUTS RUNNING TS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE 4Q ADJACENT P RTY BETWEEN SIGSBE KEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE LANE MATI,i NY APPROVED BY FOR WORK ON STATE HIGHWAY AND V ~ FOR WOR SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX, MAP ~ ~ TRAFFIC ! TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROADWAY IMPROVE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 44.1 IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25 D'IIS SEC. BLK. LOT BY DUNK m BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. DATE S ~rl I 2 10QQ 142 Q1 27 ~drawing no'' Date: 4.13.09 "'~1 ,LLL 9TE INFd A SUflVEY GATED 0 wL SITE INFORMATION Is BASED APO" Scale: AS NOTED A SUaVEY OArED 02/16/013, JOB NO 00013 , By 1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ~YOLLNnUI ~YOL L M o U.T ~~i..~ au P H 1 4O]!WE lOIM 4THYE ~ I I AEU JDLS SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" Drawn t~y: i I i i i I!i! NEW 54"5 DECORATIb -NEW 54"SQ,x 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA KEMPEY ENGINEERING EXIST, BLDG. W/ NEW NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF NEW FACIA BOARD ROOF SHINGLES TO NEW FACIA NEW NATURAL NEW 7-11 WOOD SIGN LIGHTS WITH SHINGLES MATCH ADDITION BOARD SPLIT SHAKES CARVED WALL AT ALL GABLES SIGN SEE DET.3 ANGLE REFLECTOR 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO WEST BABYLON, NY !11704 MATCH ADDITION P: 631.321.7777 F: 631.661.0486 EXIST. BLDG. W/ D o NEW FACIA BOARD 1 EXIST. BLDG. W NEW 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE j TO MATCH D ELII O FACIA BOARD TO ADDITION ATC ¦ O MATCH ADDITION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 P. 631.368.3324 FI EXIST. BLDG, W/ F. 631.368.1524 NEW HARDIP q SIDING IN LIGHT LANK n GRAY TONE EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW HARDIPLANK SIDING IN NEW 4" PRECAST REVISIONS: CONC. LEDGE ® LIGHT GRAY TONE NEW 4" PRECAST CONC. LEDGE Date Description No. 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS -1 H DATED 03/13108 NEW 6' CONC. CURB NEW 6" CONC. CURB 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE GRADE INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GRADE NEW 10" SQUARE DECORATIVE NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, NEW MAIN ENTRANCE DOI ENTRANCE DOORWAY NEW HARDIPLANK NEW PICTURE WINDOWS W/ WHITE TRIM 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF COLUMNS WITH 12" SQUARE NANTUCKET STYLE WITH W/ TRANSOM WINDOW AE STONE BASE, TYP. ® ALL 7 LOC. PRECAST CONCRETE CAP, ;DM WINDOW ABOVE SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY & SOL DIVIDED LIGHT PANELS TYP, TONE ALL NEW WINDOW LOC, SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. STRIPE STANDARDS -STANDARD COLORS 3M FILM MATERIAL 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD I MATERIAL COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 1 SOUTH ELEVATION A-RED C- GREEN 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 3680-53 (CARDINAL RED) 3680-58 (DARK GREEN) COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 A_ 1 SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0" EQUIVALENT PMS # 1797 EQUIVALENT PMS # 342 AVERY # 10836-7-11 RED AVERY # 10835-711 GREEN LIST OF DRAWINGS: B-ORANGE D- WHITE 3623 (BRIGHT ORANGE) Sheet Description EQUIVALENT PMS # 165 E-BRONZE AVERY # 10837-7 11 ORANGE PANTONE 19.1116 SP-1 'KEY MAP -SITE PLAN -PARKING CALCULATIONS -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS B q M -SANITARY CALCULATIONS -ZONING ANALYSIS oo iV SP-2 LANDSCAPE PLAN - - 1ANDSCAPE SCHEDULE LEVEn Q N N LANDSCAPE NOTES A ~ - 00 00 1 _ cn SP-3 •STTE DETAIL SP-4 i-TRUCK ROUTING PLAN E C A D cn cn SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY n NEW 54"SQ DECORATIVE -NEW 54"SO,x 76°H - 31-611 3 -0R DECORATIVE CUPOLA PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN I Or-211 A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW j 7-11 WOOD ALL SIGN A-2 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS ROOF SHINGLES TO _ ~ ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION MATCH ADDITION These plans are an instrument of iv: servlce and are the property of the Engineer. Infringements will be prosecuted. FF Contractors shall verity all field conditions and dimensions and shall be responsible for field fit and EXIST. BLDG. W/)-\ NEW FACIA BOARD EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW quality of word. No allowances TO MATCH FACIA BOARD TO MATCH ADDITION shall be made on behalf of the U Contractor for anyerror or, neglect ADDITION on his part. SEAL 1 1, 1: GAMA DEER PARK, t~ EXIST. BLDG. W/ f~ NEW HARDIPLANK I INC. q SIDING IN LIGHT EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW n GRAY TONE HARDIPLANK SIDING IN 320 FROST POND ROAD LIGHT GRAY TONE OLD BROOKVILLE,NY NEW SERVICE 5W~ ENTRACE DOOR 7-ELEVEN, INC. t MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVENUE NEW 6" / CONC. CURB NEW 6" GONG. CURB MATTITUCK, NY GRADE 6 PROVED BY G E SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP I SEC. BLK. LOT PLANNING BOARD 142 01 27 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. 2 NORTH ELEVATION NV IWO AS NOTED . 0 A-1 SCALE: I/4" = P-0" A-1 M.C. I 1 NEW 54"SQ.z 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA KEMPEY ENGINEERING 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW SIGN LIGHT WITH SHINGLES ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 ANGLE REFLECTOR P: 631.321.7777 NEW NATURAL F: 631.661.0486 SPLIT SHAKES AT ALL GABLES j. EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE Y ~ ao ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 NEW 7-11 WOOD U P. 631.368.3324 CARVED WALL SIGN BEYOND I F. 631; 368.1524 EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW FACIA BOARD TO MATCH ADDITION NEW FACIA BOARD NEW HARDIPLANK SIDING IN LIGHT REVISIONS: GRAY TONE EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW HARDIPLANK SIDING IN NEW 10" SQUARE LIGHT GRAY TONE N DECORATIVE COLUMNS Date Description No. WITH 12" SQUARE STONE BASE, TYP. REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED Y ALL 7 LOC. 10/10/08 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS 2 NEW 4" PRECAST CONCRETE LEDGE DATED 03/13/08 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 NEW 6" CONC. NEW 6" CONC. CURB RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CURB BEYOND INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GRADE GRADE 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. NANTUCKET STYLE WITH PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 WEAST ELEVATION SCALE. 114' =1'-0" LIST OF DRAWINGS: - Sheet Description SP-1 KEY MAP -SITE PLAN -PARKING CALCULATIONS -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SANITARY CALCULATIONS ZONING ANALYSIS SP-2 (LANDSCAPE PLAN NEW 54"SQ.x 76"H ILANDSCAPESCHEDULE DECORATIVE CUPOLA LANDSCAPE NOTES SP-3 I-SPTE DETAIL SP-4 TRUCK ROUTING PLAN EXIST. BLDG, W/ NEW NEW ROOF NEW GOOSENECK SP-6 AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY ROOF SHINGLES TO SHINGLES SIGN LIGHT WITH MATCH ADDITION ANGLE REFLECTOR PH-1 !-SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN I I I I i l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A-1 1NUK117iANll ~iOUlti LLEVA1'IUNS NEW NATURAL SPLIT SHAKES AT ALL GABLES A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS hF EXIST. BLDG. W/ Y P NEW ROOF These plans are an instrument of ~F •t~-~,,~ . , service and are the property of the m SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION Engineer. Infringements will be i yp, '1rs.f~1; NEW 7-11 WOOD prosecuted. 1 ~q6~! r'~a \y Vj~ CARVED WALL I I I N11 I I I I I I I I Nil III I 1111 11 SIGN BEYOND Contractors shell verify all field conditions and dimensions end sy E: shall be responsible for field fit and EXIST. BLDG. W/ quality of work. No allowances 4 NEW FACIA BOARD NEW HARDIPLANK NEW FACIA BOARD SIDING shall be made on behalf of the o TO MATCH ADDITION N Contractorfo anyerroror neglect NEW 10" SQUARE on his part. I, SEAL EXIST. BLDG. W/ H NEW HARDIPLANK DECORATIVE COLUMNS N GAMA_DEER PARK, SIDING IN LIGHT WITH 12" SQUARE STONE BASE, TYP. GRAY TONE ALL 7 LOC. Y INC. Y NEW 4" PRECAST NEW 4" PRECAST CONCRETE LEDGE CONCRETE LEDGE 320 FROST POND ROAD OLD BROOKVILLE,NY NEW 6" CONC. NEW 6° CONC. CURB 7-ELEVEN, ING, ! 3 1[1 CURB BEYOND e GRADE GRAD MAIN RD. & FACTORY,; NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, NANTUCKET STYLE WITH AVENUE PRECAST CONCRETE CAP, MATTITUCK, NY APPROVED BY SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX'' MAP' PLANNING BOARD SEC. BILK. LO 4 WEST ELEVATION TOWN F SOUTHOLD 142 01 27 A-2 SCALE: 1/4" = P-0" DATE Date: 1 02.25.09 drawing no. i AS NOTED -2 M.C. I Town of Southold Annex 12/9/2011 1 54375 Main Road B Southold, New York 11971 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: 35321 Date: 12/9/2011 THIS CERTIFIES that the building COMMERCIAL ALTERATION Location of Property: 9945 Route 25, Mattituck, NY 11952, SCTM 473889 See/Block/Lot: 142.4-27 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this officed dated 4/11/2011 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 36423 dated 5/25/2011 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: construct an addition and alterations to an existine commercial building, to a 7-11, as per Planning as applied for. The certificate is issued to GAMA Properties-Deer Inc (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL C10-09-0007 12/6/11 ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. 36423 10/24/11 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED 12/1/11 Michael Ave o Au rued Sign re O f $oU O MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS A ly P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR h0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS G Q Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ',Q}, • ,,O 54375 State Route 25 Youngs Ave.) S J. WH. RICH III ILENSKI Ul'~CQ (cor. Main olid. Southold, NY DONALD Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 2, 2011 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Seven Eleven Store Located at 9945 NYS Rt. 25, n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: B (Business) Dear Ms. Moore: Following a site inspection on November 29, 2011, the Planning Board has found that the site has been constructed in accordance with the Approved Site Plan in all respects except for the radius improvement work at Factory Avenue and Rt. 25, and that other outstanding issues identified in the letter, dated November 15, 2011, have been completed. On November 14, 2011, the Planning Board approved a resolution to allow the Building Department to issue a conditional Certificate of Occupancy prior to the completion of the radius improvement work. The condition on the Certificate of Occupancy is that the radius improvement work is to be completed according to the Approved Site Plan and to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and the New York State Department of Transportation. Prior to issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy, the NYS Department of Transportation requires that they be contacted when the radius work is completed. Further, the Planning Board will require a confirmation by the New York State DOT that the radius improvement work has been completed to their satisfaction. As a reminder, the Planning Board required at their November 14, 2011 Public Meeting that the applicant post a Performance Bond, in an amount to be determined by the Planning Board, but in no event less than the estimated cost of the radius work to move the traffic signals and utilities if the work has not commenced by May 1, 2012. Failure to post this bond by May 31, 2012 will constitute a violation of this Site Plan Approval. Mattituck Seven Eleven Page Two December 2. 2011 Planning Board approval is required prior to any significant changes to the site. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer PlanninNoard Site Inspecton Record Project Nam&&~} ~,eV Tax Map# J . - ~ -a7 Date 0. t ~fzw` Attending: 8C Purpose of site visit: CO. ~tkuew,ber tS, Dolt (elier~ Notes: 117f Co,ti• ,~e,~;ba~ a~ v er~~ 5 o~ rU yS el. QS 1 rls fee en~i~e`~ MS4 Reporting Illicit discharge on or near site? Y oCp~ If Yes, briefly describe: (provide copy of this report to Town Stormwater Manager) PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 7654643 November 28, 2011 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 RE: GAMA PROPERTIES MATTITUCK 7-11 SCTM: 1000-142-01-27 Dear Mr. Sidon. With reference to the above and pursuant to our emails to Heather Lanza on November 21 s` and November 22nd, please be advised that the remaining items on your inspection letter have been completed. Please arrange for a final inspection as soon as possible and advise us of the inspection date. Thank you for your prompt attention in this matter. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore PCM/bp encls. 11/28/2011 15:20 MOORE LAW ICES 1765dB43 P.0011001 PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New Yolk 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 November 28, 2011 Southold Town Planning Board _ / Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 NOV 2 9 2011 RE: GAMA PROPERTIES MATTITUCK 7-11 SCTM:1000.142-01-27 Dear Mr. Sidor: With reference to the above and pursuant to our emalls to Heather Lanza on November 21Ot and November 22nd, please be advised that the remaining items on your inspection letter have been completed. Please arrange for a final inspection as soon as possible and advise us of the inspection date. Thank you for your prompt attention in this matter. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore PCMIbp encls. G PATRICIA C. MOORE r L Attorney at Law y 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsy Perkins Secretaries November 17, 2011 Southold Town Planning Board NOV 18 2011 Martin Sidor, Chairman and Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Sidor and Board: My client and I want to thank you for working with us to resolve the challenges of this project. We appreciate the extra effort by you and your staff. Ve ours, icia C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. Southold Town Board The Suffolk Times 1 • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS pf SOpj~o Sou o is ox 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR i s7I Chair r r lr J~ OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y -Ac Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~p 54376 State Route 26 JAMES H. RICH III ,nM (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) - DONALD J. WILCENSKI y~Unl, ~y Southold, NY Telephone: 631 766-1938 Fax: 631 766-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE November 15, 2011 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Amendment to Site Plan Approval: Game Deer Park (7-11, Mattituck) Located on the n/e comer of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: Business Dear Ms. Moore: The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, November 14, 2011, adopted the following resolutions: WHEREAS, by resolution on December 12, 2010, the Planning Board approved the Site Plan referenced above; and WHEREAS, during the site planning process the Town identified that the turning radius for westbound Main Road (Rt. 25) to northbound Factory Avenue does not meet current New York State Department of Transportation standards, due to the alignment of Factory Avenue. The applicant agreed to participate in the correction of this alignment problem, in conjunction with the NYS DOT. The applicant entered into an agreement with the NYS DOT whereby the applicant will dedicate the property needed to implement this improvement, and will provide detailed design plans for both the radius improvement and the traffic signal equipment re-location at no expense to the Town or the State of New York. In addition, as part of the site development, the applicant will construct the radius improvement. The NYS DOT has indicated that, in light of the applicant's willingness to provide this benefit to the traveling public, they will provide for the re-location of the traffic signal equipment and the utilities (and associated poles); and WHEREAS, the Planning Board's approval resolution contained a condition requiring the radius improvement from Rt. 25 to Factory Avenue be completed prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued to ensure the correction to the radius was done; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 2011, the Planning Board received a letter from the applicant requesting a final site inspection and asking that the Certificate of Occupancy be issued prior to the radius work being completed; and I~ t Seven Eleven. Mattituck Page Two November 15, 2011 WHEREAS, the applicant has provided evidence that they have posted a bond to the NYS DOT guaranteeing the completion of their portion of the radius work; and WHEREAS, the applicant has further offered to provide a Performance Bond to ensure that additional costs associated with moving the utility poles will also be guaranteed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has found that this guarantee is acceptable; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby amends the December 12, 2010 resolution approving this Site Plan as follows: 'RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants approval with ens two conditions to the Site Plan entitled "7-Eleven, Inc.", prepared by Eugene Kempey, P.E., originally dated February 25, 2009 and last revised on December 10, 2010, and including the following pages: • SP-01 Site & Drainage Plan • SP-02 Landscape Plan • SP-03 Site Detail • SP-04 Truck Routing Plan • SP-06 Aerial Photo Plan • PH-1 Site Lighting Plan • A-1 N &S Elevations • A-2 E & W Elevations, and authorizes the Chairman to endorse the site plan packet. aRertge fellewiag seaditiea is rnet: Conditions of Site Plan Approval: 1. The applicant must submit a letter from the NYS Department of Transportation stating they have no objections to Site Plan Approval being granted prior to their Highway Work Permit being issued. G- twtific%ata- Of 0- GeUpaney Will not be -is s und- until After the N1342 QQT has nothfiAd the Plann*nq 13eaFd that they aFe satisfied that all the i-A-rark Gn the as noted on the plan has been GOmpleted. 2. Provide a letter from the NYS DOT that the work to improve the radius at Rt. 25 & Factory Avenue has been completed to their satisfaction. The Building Department may issue a conditional Certificate of Occupancy prior to the completion of the radius improvement work, however, the Planning Board must first issue a final inspection letter finding that the remainder of the site work (other than the radius improvement work) is in accordance with the Site Plan. The condition on the Certificate of Occupancy is that the radius improvement work is to be completed Seven Eleven. Mattituck Page Three November 15, 2011 according to the Approved Site Plans and to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and the New York State Department of Transportation. As a further guarantee the Planning Board requires the applicant to post a Performance Bond in an amount to be determined by the Planning Board. but in no event less than the estimated cost of the radius work to move the traffic signals and utilities if the work has not commenced by May 1.2012. Failure to post this bond by May 31$ 2012 will constitute a violation of this Site Plan Approval. The remainder of the Planning Board's approval resolution remains in full force and effect. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ~--N'. Martin H. Sidor Chairman cc: Town Engineer Building Department By signing this letter, the applicant/property owner, applicant's agent and business . owner acknowledge that there are two conditions listed above, as well as Town Code re uirements that must be satisfied for this site to be in full co liance. George Abi Zeid, Applicant/Property Owner 'Pgfficia C. Moore, Esq., Agent for Applican Anthony C eo, Mattituck Seven Eleven Franchisee • • MAIIdNG ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS OF SO!/r~o P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS A ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~O 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H. RICH III (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI CQ, Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1838 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 15, 2011 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Seven Eleven Store Located at 9945 NYS Rt. 25, n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck SCTM#1000-142: 1-27 Zoning District: B (Business) Dear Ms. Moore: The Planning Board inspected the site referenced above on November 4, 2011. The site is not yet fully developed in accordance with the Approved Site Plan. The following improvements must be completed and inspected by the Planning Board: 1. The radius improvement at westbound NYS Rt. 25 and Factory Avenue; and 2. Installation of the light fixture on the sign at the corner of Factory Avenue and NYS Rt. 25 as approved on the Site Plan; and 3. Completion of the pavement striping in front of the ingress/egress along the westbound lane of NYS Rt. 25 that appears to be altered due to a recent asphalt patch; and 4. Removal of the broken tree and debris behind the building. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office at (631)765-1938. Very truly yours, Brian A. Cummings Planner • Pa~, PATRICIA C. MOORE C Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 November 14, 2011 Attn: Martin Sidor, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 RE: GAMA PROPERTIES NOV 1 5 2011 MATTITUCK 7-11 SCTM: 1000-142-01-27 Dear Chairman Sidor and Board members: My client has offered in good faith to pay for the State's obligation with the understanding that Mr. Cocheo will be permitted to open. We do not want his employees to lose their jobs over the unnecessary delay. On Friday, GAMA paid the non-refundable fee to Verizon that is required for Verizon to provide the cost estimate to relocate the poles and utilities. This expense is not required if the NYSDOT directs Verizon to relocate the poles. According to the Verizon representative, NYS does not pay Verizon to complete this work. A bond cannot be obtained until written cost estimates are provided from all the utility companies. Verizon advised that it could take two to three weeks to provide their written proposal due to the engineering involved to reroute the utility lines. As soon as we have the written proposals, we will immediately pursue the bond. My client has performed all his obligations. The Board has no reason to be concerned that he will not follow through with his promise. Thank you for your anticipated prompt attention to this matter so that Mr. Cocheo will be able to open for business. ru y urs, P cia C. Moore /pcm cc: Gama properties Cummings, Brian A. From: Richter, Jamie Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 20112:16 PM To: Cummings, Brian A. Subject: RE: Mattituck 7-11 Brian I have inspected all of the installation work related to required draiange for the 7-11 Project. All work was completed in a satisfactory manner. I have pictures in the file if the Board wants to see any of them. Jamie FYI: I will be away from the office 11/11 to 11/18. 1 will be back on 11121. James A. Richter Office of the Engineer Town of Southold, New York Jamie. richterCcDtown.southold.ny. us Office: 631-765-1560 Cell: 631-926-9430 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. From: Cummings, Brian A. Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 10:41 AM To: Richter, Jamie Subject: Mattituck 7-11 Goodmorning Jamie, As you know the Planning Board has been deliberating over the site plan for the Mattituck 7-11 store. At this time I do not know whether they will be voting at our work session/public meeting next Monday the 14th, so I'm trying to tie everything up information wise so that as a department we know where the site plan currently stands. I wanted to know if you were involved in the installation process of the drainage on site and if you are satisfied with what was constructed. Unfortunately, I've dealt more with drainage affidavits than comments from you on drainage requirements for approved site plans. Please let me know what your thoughts are and your involvement with the construction process. Thanks. 1 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law HL 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 7654330 Fax: (631)765-4643 November 7, 2011 Attn: Martin Sidor, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 NOV - 9 2011 RE: GAMA PROPERTIES MATTITUCK 7-11 SCTM: 1000-142-01-27 Dear Chairman Sidor and Board members: With reference to the above and specifically in response to Heather Lanza's email with questions from the board (dated 11/2/11), please be advised as follows: 1. Copies of existing bonds are attached. A) NYSDOT Performance Bond issued by International Fidelity Insurance Company #HOIFSU0401635 in the amount of $75,000. This bond covers all work which is the responsibility of the highway work permit holder (permit 33)and shown on the NYSDOT highway work permit drawings. Original Bond is held by NYSDOT, Mark Wolfgang, P.E., and they are the secured (insured) party. Please note the Bond remains in full force until the work is "satisfactorily completed and accepted" by Mark Wolfgang of NYSDOT. B) Surety Bond #ASB-521493 in the amount of $7,500.00 to guaranty landowner will gift land (radius) to New York State. The NYS Attorney General's office must send us the papers. Land donation is shown on the site plan. 2. The radius modification work will begin within ten (10) business days from removal of the utility poles. 3. Please see attached draft letter. I will give you my professional undertaking to try to obtain a time line from the entities and will continue to follow-up with them and keep the Board apprised of the progress. If you have contacts, direct inquiries to the utility companies by the Town of Southold will be appreciated. 4. The following procedures are available: With a Certificate of Occupancy the following language may be included as a "special condition" on the Certificate of Occupancy: "Completion of the radius improvements and pavement markings on NY 25 and Factory Avenue will be a continuing obligation for the validity of the Certificate of Occupancy until such work has been completed and accepted by the State of New York Department of Transportation." (See Town Code Section 144-17 B. (9)). Or "Temporary Certificate of Occupancy" is issued, "in accordance with NYSDOT letter dated October 31, 2011." (See Town Code Section 144-18) 5. Your question was referred to the Traffic Engineer, Vincent Corrado of Dunn Engineering who provides the following information: As was thoroughly addressed in the Traffic Study "the improvement to the radius addresses an existing condition, NOT a condition that results from the addition of traffic generated by the 7-11. The improvement remediates an existing non-standard radius for westbound to northbound right turning traffic, which is completely unaffected by the 7-11. West bound traffic destined to the 7-11 will turn into the driveway on Rt25 before they reach the intersection, and those that originally intended to travel north on Factory Avenue will leave the site via the driveway on Factory Avenue. According to Mr. Corrado, in actual practice, the 7-11 will likely REDUCE the number of vehicles making the westbound to northbound right turn, since it will draw some traffic from the existing stream, and they will leave via the Factory Avenue exit. That is why NYSDOT agreed to participate in the cost of the improvement. Had this been an improvement solely to mitigate the 7-11's impact, NYSDOT would have required that GAMA foot the entire bill. Moreover, the operating conditions are further enhanced by the elimination of 2 driveways, one on Factory and one on Rte 25. The former gas station had 4 driveways; 7-11 has 2. Relocation of the remaining access points are further away from the intersection, which was done in accordance with the Board's site plan requirements." 6. The Bond, by its terms, remains in full force and effect until the work is performed and accepted by NYSDOT. The contractor completed 90% of the work covered under the performance bond, therefore, Mr. Mark Wolfgang wrote his letter of October 31, 2011. The construction contract with 7-11 includes completion of the radius improvements and pavement markings after the pole is removed. We have calls to the existing bond company to inquire the feasability of adding the Town of Southold as additional insured. The contractor is waiting for an answer from the bonding company. We will provide this information as soon as it is available. We do not want this issue to delay either the Planning Board resolution or the Certificate of Occupancy. Thank you for your prompt attention in this matter. Very t rs, atricia C. Moore cc: Gama properties PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 7654643 November 7, 2011 Attn: Ken Mucci LIPA Cablevision Verizon 117 Doctor's Path 254 County Road 58 TBD Riverhead NY 11901 Riverhead NY 11901 RE: PROPOSED 7-11 CONVENIENCE STORE PREMISES: 9945 MAIN ROAD (RTE 25), MATTITUCK SCTM: 1000-14200-0100-02700 NYS DOT CASE # 01-099P HIGHWAY PERMIT # 20111026104 Dear Sir or madam: The remaining work to be completed by GAMA Properties, the HWP holder, pursuant to the above referenced permit CANNOT be completed until the DOT relocates the utility pole(s) and traffic control signal pedestrian pole. It is our understanding that NYS is working with the utility companies and the NYS DOT signal contractor for the pole relocations. DOT has advised us that they anticipate the work to be completed in the Spring, 2012. The Town of Southold Planning Board has asked that we obtain from each of the above utilities an acknowledgment of the projected work to be completed and provide a date when the work is anticipated to be completed. If you have any questions or wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore 08/19/2011 11:50 15169099 AIRPORTPLAZAS . PAGE 01/06 (Nrace Insurance Agency Commercial Accounts Division 88 Broadway Hicksville, NY 11801 Phone (516) 932-8100 Pax (516) 932-0388 August 18, 2011 Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc 3§6 North Broadway,Suite 206 Jericho NY 11753 Ro: Bond American Safety Cas Ins Co 846-11 to 8.16-12 D.-arGeorge Enclosed find your Bond for the captioned period. Should you have any questions, pl.aase call.Please make sure you sign second page of bond and have third page Notarized before you present bond Sim , o rcial Account Representative :Enclosure 08/19/2011 11:50 1516904099 AIRPORTPLAZAS PAGE 02/06 SURETY BOND (PERFORMANCE) BOND NO.: ASH-521493 AMOUNT: $7,500.00 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS That we, Gama Properties-Deer Park, Inc., with offices at 366 North Broadway, Jericho, New York 11753, as Principal, and American Safety Casualty Insurance Company, with offices at 100 Gallerla Parkway S.S., Suite 700, Atlanta, Georgia 30339, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF TITS STATEOF NEW YORK. in the sum of Seven Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, WHEREAS the Principal has agreed to donate certain real property and/or interest(s) in real property in the Town of Riverhead, County of Suffolk, to the State of New York as deemed necessary by the Commissioner of Transportation in connection with certain permits which the Principal has received and/or will apply for and WHEREAS the State of New York plans to acquire title to such real property and/or real property interest(s) by eminent domain; and WHEREAS in relation to such acquisition the Principal has executed, or will execute, an Agreement of Adjustment which provides, among other things, that the Principal will secure to the State of New York a full release of all claims by reason of the acquisition, except such claims as may be specifically excluded by said Agreement; and WHEREAS this bond is for the purpose of ensuring and guaranteeing the timely and full compliance by the Principal with the terms of the Agreement of Adjustment, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED and understood by the Principal and the Surety that the bond will not be released until the Principal has fully complied with the terms of the Agreement of Adjustment, which compliance shall be evidenced by the issuance of a closing letter by the Real Property Bureau of the Office of the New York State Attorney General; and IT IS FURTHER AGREED that the Principal will make every effort to provide completed closing papers to the Department of Transportation witbin thirty days of the delivery of such papers to the Principal by the.Department of Transportation; and 08/19/2011 11:50 15169099 AIRPORTPLAZAS • PAGE 03/06 - - - - Firm Acknowledgment state of I } } ss: County of ~~UA / } On this day of ~ 2011, before me personally canoe nor a Abizeid to me known d who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he is the President of Game Properties-Deer Park, Inc. the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation, that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, and that he signed his/her name thereto by like 0 er, My commission expires 3 / r. Notary Public - - - Surety Acknowledgment JOAN T. SEERY Natary Puhna. Stele of New Yark No, O1SEa510550 State of New York } Cammz salon Expose ifolk coon } ss: County of -Nassau) On this 16m day of Ate, 2011, before me personally came Rachel Price to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that helshe is an attorney-in-fact of , American Safety Casualty Insurance Company the corporation described in and which executed the within instrument; that he knows the corporate seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to the within instrument is such corporate seal, and that he signed the said instrument and affixed the said seal as Attorney-in-Fact by authority of the Board of Directors of said corporation and by authority ofthis office under the Standing Resolutions thereof. My commission expires otary Pu JOSEPH t,SO %i i.IiY PUBLIC, 5?:tTE Of OF YORK NO. DIXA612880 AUFIEO IN NJUSAU COUNT/ CCUMISSION EXrRRE9 Wow--", /d~~711V 08/19/2011 11:50 15169099 AIRPORTPLAZAS • PAGE 04/06 IT IS FURTHER AGREED that the Principal and the Surety hereby indemnify and save hmrmless the State of New York and the Department of Transportation from any and all liability, claims, damages and expenses of ovary kind and nature arising from such acquisition of real property and/or real property interest(s) made by the State of New York pursuant to the Eminent Domain Procedure Law of the State of New York, or otherwise. This bond takes effect on August 16, 2011 and shall remain in full force and effect until the issuance of a closing letter relating to the Agreement of Adjustment in this matter, as set for above. The Principal and the Surety have caused this Bond to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the 16°i day of August, 2011. Principal: Garcia P es-Deer c. Surety: erican 5afetv C t Insurance- COMMY By: Rachel Price, Attorney-In-Fact 08/19/2011 11:50 151690V99 AIRPORTPLAZAS • PAGE 05/06 American Safely Casualty Insurance Company 200 Galleda Parkway SE Suite 700 jag Atlanta, GA 30539 AMm1AAN5efe7Y6lstMW TAI Free. esv ySe.g64y Tab 7 -WilLa9ss tlrr "o.9".4139 .,m...mauety., American Safety Casually Insurance Company Statement of December 31, 2010 Admitted Assets I.Milmas, Capital sad Surplus Bonds ;89,117,575 Unpaid losses and loss expanses ;59,486,088 stacks 58,414,351 Relmumna payable 3.721,934 cash 1,454,5158 Reserve for urxlmavMn9 expanses 818,063 Shorelalm Investments 118771782 Reserve for eneamed prrNuna 1022,475 investment incana due and accrued 984,928 Ceded rainwranca premiums psyebl9 13,0y0,778 Agents end premium balances 24,521,836 "Mon for roilsuanee 1,694,762 Renaunuw7 reamtemele 7A95,453 payable u0sfrdufiae 2,971.820 CuMaM lades ands Income tax BK920 Othor liabi6ees 8 BesMS Nrdefs',' taxaseet 2,322.558 Total UsbiRia 108,0se,161 Recelvabls from afikates 2,309,981 Cspsal SWOk 2,000,000 Color admitted assets 1.420.649 surplus dotes 2.504000 Spacial surplus kinds 47,478,193 Unasslynod funds 27.159.209 Policy holder surplus 79.157.A02 TOM 197i93ea3 Total 9187193.383 Securit es have been valued on the basis permitted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners STATE OF OEORGIA COUNTY OF COBB Ambuff Kumar Jain, Secretary and Joseph D. Scollo. President; being duly sworn oath himself deposes and Says that they are the above described officers of the Amorl an Safety Casualty Insurance Company, Oklahoma, that said Company Is a Corporation duly organized existing and engaged in business as a Surety by virtue of laws of the State of Oklahoma and has duty compiled with ail the requirements of said state applicable to said Company and is duly qualified to sot as Surety under such lawai that said Company has also compiled with and is duly qualified to act as Surety under Public Law 07- 258 enacted September 13, 1982 (00 STAT.1047 as amended: 31 U.S.C. 9304-9305): that to the bast of my knowledge and belief the above statement is a full, true and correct Statement of Assets and Liabilities of the said Company as of Oeoembor31,2010, Subscribed and sworn to before me This yOf Mot tlln jj~~{9 i secrete S, 1"r ' IJ~ ~ :a APWILi t 1 ~e ZQ14 7 s Pt3?stdenl QA\ In )6Ins aaroSo st v c ~ ASIG Inaumale So es ,.4 .y `fir YIP,NOV. ee/19/2011 11:50 15169 '699 AIRPORTPLAZAS PA( 06/06 s. s 1 i=. .,r . : .m~; • : hO"'! ;w ifi' S eY.:H " . . >•;k, +g .':'~3? L.{ _~iK; i~" Nf`. YF `i~yrt•x ~ sN :aN ~..n. :i:j,'nr!M' .~it• r,.... ...r ..._y~(~ NUMBER r:8a .,our.. a reiawy, A e„-•~.vx~.. irk.. v ~ 148.," : R r ,ta at: ! l.a x...i :fS k.a•'t M-' 'i' . :iF} pfr xra.k l..' iui.•<:u.: 1,!A•,s, i[v£.: :3 ri d':: t.:,; `3,{; ,i:~;h.,x,e,: ~oY~:' :Max;' .:~.'w'.~` ~~~~~y:1:1 .r,., =xyrl ELF'Pl V\ '.Ifv'vyy .fi,) .Y~ip,'P4m. K:. FSn ,f '•.a.['itip ,n tbi• kla :::'M C. .:1. l A " YJF K .t 4:A ••''p?`%4' l;, z3& Rid tt,hs:S Ms;~;' ejlj•iY' *Kr; x'^ N a ~s:i i ji::i:: 91. gr•d09$' F- k ..SV .'t:'t :1.$.A• ~ci i itl: <tl: iit' '3` tt f: 4N~ ' a: 3 ....a .e;F Je + " " ib .asi e.i 4w1 . !e! NJ!F" ~.r..rt j(_ , t. t5 ....n e . Si.Li tir 't F'' dir.€' k:.X •:.Fe'~" . tniu .ri~.a. p KNOW ALL MEN BY -MRAE PRESENTS, OW American ft" CevAft (Imm " ComDeny has made, c«wdmmd and appoktphd. WA by two pnmaerdsdnaarreka hlatllNufeandappaiMa' JEFFREYPE;IGE 1itAGHEL~PRiCE VALE. YS7EAM NY k, sad 55:. .I '.^3•. ..:iy W,. ° dG'e::.. '.ie, "r'xr ts. ti Sv!^Y ~d'',. s' ~.p A. 15',. ;:.._i l.J~- .:,irY .ul +:~.:K 6 j ~w Jdyl' i~~ t:?:9 gix~'' 3¢¢py'>;' 'S +~;1 ~~~'y, r~y~{~ if lp cY i.,» t,:{.3'M1i tlla,r4• SSI: i~:nY %Ni 4::: i1 t: yY: 'fr ^x9,i$,'. "a .''«a' €Fi>ya dlb eed'tl~ih.A tar k 811d'lb' na$aai'P~ae~ tn1`ateed m eYdtkrm•dtti5hdtm~ d'Ofa raid Company, b'$ gplgPf, hallda, Wleah01an7 9~'x" +T4 4!e4r COrdntlCJadaaralyanlP~b ~tl?}''te„wv fwdati~ or COR.:0d ..1• kt hi a7F. `R?iV . hf t 2:Y 4yti.n nr"i Yip:(.:: ,ij tr4 N S b! H;;h .e 1. J,:;3V rr iqY p.'re, 6., i<6; w•tx. •M:€ IQ7aIMIffC3NfP''~i2,000000'.00) fL1 AR3 v€3 TMs Poway d AOuney is gremad and Is sWW and sailed by fdihxinge under and by dro ah*w* of the following Reaam9on adopted by the Board d "tan- ' •,r w., % „ :...DSedpa rIh~Ay Ldsy d x e,.. :Lh -xf_ TL- !JIa.B° 2Q99. .93. it oi:~ v.AYag .yy'~,~ . .N'r1'. .,.x: {.x", t: x.` t~tat„ rt: 4-! Yt91's:l. .'iii.li~ .iw-,.lY.t, ..L4•'4t' 3'73['..1. y iMM., u?i` Y RESOLVE t ar. ;€fi'stiOnlUn }v~4~1aF any As M aPP a: d:.t+r ' ot, datkud ar Kra~rd N I eNda$ck g dha hiPPaklaflall) b iadl case, for wl~d IN Ccalparry, b atreuhe and daY1 er and agkt Oda and tithe Company b bonda, utdartal ps, rera rkerim and suretyahp oh WFmw dap kinds; and said ollicaro may romove any much apomey-lt, 2I p t`:•... .:a !~a:mx 'w. ~1:' 6uNa. w;i ''a'w'J.. ihY it 'nta NNtriaR'0ta~'n4Y nth such lot 1. i. S.r~~ ii.i~ ii` ; a ie. Raw 1 IT It.. tt yi.. ,i sal: a°~.e t' t to N e ixr: w r.. iv t;x SOLVEtl UR111„ Irl;¢s nd•undi ddhh9 XO~~gitC&A°''ar aumtyl o Y eer.'ylh~l*_d Alld and'6~nO i0%*my whsni, •a;::t4v amok m• dprudby do Pmaldmak.ac_my mall !d a sad y m9uiredl ltlL9hhy !Y 3r ~L,._. Wm signed by tlb PromWuyxR hx ahry rcwProaigem or SaaNuy ar AssWlant 8hxaeery, and asanfer Blgthad and eased (ra Beal s MmmW* d) by a t :u S V 4 t~' k @1G one hx' .2e x~ . :kl.tµa'i i`~sF~a, ' Witllia .;.a::, u'xr'0 'S i . n. Y •E- :"e•'+o.• C ;'"'pay.'~Y€th h'°'yy~.: a~. air Ywla,•x• 3.i:1 °''o>.°v,+ 'F~., tµ.' R@SMVEO FURR ik Out ft slgrukre of any ahhtlldtaed a0lcer and the Gaol d IM Company may be etfoatl by taahmOs m any power d aRornay a or cerOOaapoo the eaewaon.wd dNM,ry d ,any bond, undutnkshg, rock anoe a olhor mhA'P aJtllpiona of ba.C01R1 e"T+ . u A. .i,.. eF{,. ss.; _i, pleh> a ,j~amed`• e 4 ? PRO aad all a <;'r-sz i=r- Y I~ 1. P : Zi 8S ~:-Fa-tit.:. :aR. li,{:.e !3paehy baT~trc.eaas .'9=h$ted~ 61a :ca n ry.:4 .::i' sn s • ss~i~ks presaFi~i m'OO^a' i..i ea :a *x:7 :.pN wtTNE&~~~REnt'h, XiN>aR6 seedy Y~ ~'8iraaNifcm d114heal to as barfatndd`eRDdei1'a *nod by is Pm kW and alladed by Ile Saudary mta a day dAugwl: 2009 l:rr.:azx, K uFM n, Ft,. .<arvv~ ?N-i:t>,{.. tae n. ,i'i'WC:a Ma .w 46 y . ...x ~ , .r . Cs.".s3£ koitv, rxF:yE: sa:,d??'" l~ ~ WiM11, v.,pIbtQ JaI1L». }$y^~.Lu.t:;1-, his i'+iait 4'1'I ».S' ,rig:}t a zr: :r:.. ehM p t4,•t~l,,~r e ' r$i r a U: :[i: • a Pu. } g~ tl 4 , Cr1 s ,iii wl+:l I.A rlw:i C°€ i iY.x{ : ire Yi i;Y <uxl'j.. 'eti .1: F i; •el, JiY;...in T.!P w ~N~ lR' , .,,'BYATE CN~"::..,. ;;f4 yi~t.te>.)~ x*= ":::fix <:Xr. e.L„y,. as -nsr. H ¢OUNTY,OF COBS 1 m'' _ aft i G Y. w +i cl9ti/1r. 1i 'ss...,. . f .li, Y.. Yal "I" Lo Jh:; *x'... IM! Ntza:p t•a; •N {lI inks irii'i;.. ik c. la' li`y"'EiA ' €•I v`s'!Itly e Ba rS,'.. Ip:l Mal aia•~•i,.~ri~py~f,,.i. >.t M. o. ~:[x f of"F -desMW WJ•' M k'E11+pN Jft rv nsburnert'll':RN11191••„, err y,"; ;f he Is the PeM Call' of* CAEU 9Y M ice , the colporeffien /ld belng knayve t~hs~"al tM1M uld omporasen; s~A ff ieJ."al MOoead~b~Ihpsyapjytl~kleWbuvmem is xxlh corporate Beak 9b! to was mo alfooed bl alley dtlu BeerA d' . !4e. :~~'ti~YaMSd'h!hh!dR?%3b4,tl€p94lI!Pt Ma ~9beddleante thentabr rlM OfdpL 'hF1 _ Vi MY ti IT; I— ~ - 'PSti~gYr... 41,a N> i 'S i.i 'sla .1 alSnK :,ra iTSr Y'IS ::x:: "le,n ItR! ir"~SB:e:! I~r ci !3 " r lR •rl:, ....:...r w:.: r ...ar. r+•••. ~~r• ascatY aiN' rtl. 1o ,'Ftl: YmCf itl N~ etlxz• mz '.1f?u' •:i:l!:1 s4r' L4+s' "Fs.:1.^!a' ,.;yr.. :iJ.: `3 e q: er 6:Ppi' .:fa x.N 'aFa r'+".YJ• ;?Y€sy4<.s4 ra+e.r _ W7llfiftar ftN > s'.x aec~ COL. pia, >t : :."r.:; •.p5:; s; a~.t Q'pX 55.9..• 1 .:.j+iaii °.:a'~s1. i•, i s«t. <q le :ens a G• t:'«: tl<i I%K ' 13:F ._P aY.:;X,: :!sr f4:.Ae: J'~! .ii{]:n:4 k,314" Q•t" tF;K F3s F8r keN Hu ISwY '.Pa PFP. law. MI. .'i.T ia€.FU.If~ !Xj"• , t•~y1'°• „ ti,la£."lm I :y: .ztl.[I- { f R F' ! „tlY 'Urrtkf ;J Tr8 !H]iY' s .n.r., ::E'} iRFR1 " ~p.yf i X:tl 'xY:ll• ( Yi' :...f h.C:,• r n' W::. r' S IiE !efi? I, the undusipned, Secretary d American Seely Casualty Insu m Company, an Oldehorru caporaaon, 00 HEREBY CERTIFY, IN 3 Su tone_~d~~~11 7.. r1YAl AOd h~ M+R open ravr ~h ifOgdadlln%that tlta Raeolti9or}d Ma a>R pfd t ta1W amid atbdt~q 'ray.: s9O!alypal&$ I iWc4 Yf fk! . e s[5.s 'e1!1 3." Ai[i.sf n.!4ss'is? rvr,.u: lxe set E 1. U°•%•' i : M ? . a,. w' ss tlaly y e laid 7yy ~.T- .i•r. .r r11MN IR In mrt'aA•t'F q~ aJi:2!'a HY SX~i;: fJ'S 'rG-Fr a" xYi •J:E .vy %f xQ [ :n~nn r Y :a.' s,ix t$. tE.... !'..,.t' '::i5•,t:' Pp~'„1"°" lr: ':ie•€ s, : i,t' n~::lt~iS€gnad and assail in tlu Cby of A9anta, in the Shade d CieArg6s~rc`~ v,~ Dated tMe _day Of 7wt M.- o'. Y, :':r. .r. • .rv a.. v .,..i :.il tr5 eii lGI. wi i-l yep .N ~.t-[ Xt .so- fu' .xxx 'av. L L1 ~4; t i'c~ ,"r f 1.0r ~H•l y M15 ~sf eJS :,.,,a, _ ~~t I• 4a £i3 '.i,A.:• 'J,i.xrly .ii.; r~, i{.iec~' 'e~sr . s. ` ..:1. %.ws'<"}'r :;>se :3:45' k~k ~`3'•3~T' • . Arra}hhJ Jain 'W: d6. iP:a ).Y:-.. Iii,. /9i' •S Sns 4[r... P`.r •fy'1{.^ leis iAis. 1-0tl ~i5 as. „q.. 1P111. I.. ; ~ ........'Q~1!)1NrU$?f~S. ~ 6Y'AMi'YR R'" wi7}t(~ '~U ~ • 'sa' :'f•b a«...y... } a,:r'~f 1 'i''i i:f ~.t '•fG .,Yyl Ml I t2'Oi .1 Tr , r :z• ra:s sc~o-n- t.Qk7Ce~xt.E55R~GIgHi~~1E'1HE SA61~"i'FbR AN OIU1 ~hPr CUl 1ta7jiC1'OQ17$AI, a[r • . l'a i:pE eieie y 'IY.LI J' iiF. .i} yne::. n nY r• `TT .rr~l. '•v a ::me: wt £;8e• :er ii s.l s.9 zsr f• f £ f Y9 '.~9i f IY 1n1 .F£9H i<' xi;J1 i.i <iN NfY E a,r R t, 4Y : G )f.'k It. $-0 i$ I:h ':Ii t~j: ~ly fY iR<. ~~L YC. ;1 'F1 'Rr '!d i5 i 4. F ( j %t)t<f. /Y t a ~4 'f„9Y i A 00 PERM 44(9/10) SURETY BOND (PERFORMANCE) . For the benefit of The New York State Department of Transportation In connection with work affecting state highways International Fidelity insurance company (SURETY-INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY COMPANY NAME) BOND NO. HOIFSU0401635 AMOUNT: $ 75, 000.00 KNOWN ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, That we,Gemstar Construction Corp. (PRINCIPALS NAME), having its principal place of business a83 Jewett Ave. , Staten Island, NY 10302 as Principal, International Fidelity Insurance Company (INSt1R.4NCEANDiNDEMNITY COMPANY), as Surety, having an office and usual place of business at one Riverf ront Plaza Newark, NJ 07102 are held and firmly bound unto the NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ("NYSDOT"), in the full and just sum of Seventy Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars (t75,000.00) to the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, to jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, said Principal will submit and has submitted plans and specifications for work, within a State highway, deemed necessary by the Commissioner of Transportation, or his duly authorized delegate, and WHEREAS, said Principal has received and will apply from time to time for permits for the purpose of constructing or maintaining drive entrances, sewer lines, water mains, gas mains, utility lines and poles, street Intersections, curb, sidewalk, drainage and excavating for miscellaneous structures, etc., on or within the right of way of highways under the jurisdiction of the State of New York, Department of Transportation, WHEREAS, this obligation is for the purpose of insuring and guaranteeing the timely and workmanlike completion of such work as reasonably determined by the Commissioner of Transportation or his duly authorized delegate, IT IS AGREED and understood among the parties hereto that upon the reasonable determination that such work is not being timely performed or is not being or has not been performed in a workmanlike manner by said Principal, the Commissioner of Transportation or his duly authorized delegate may require said Surety to promptly complete said work in a timely and workmanlike manner, or the Commissioner of Transportation or his duly authorized delegate may direct completion of said work with forces chosen by the Commissioner, the i NYSDOT PERM 44 (rev. 9/10) 1 ' PERM 44 (9/10) costs of which work will be reimbursed by said Surety up the amount designated above, all of which determinations shall be within the sole and exclusive discretion of the Commissioner of Transportation or his duly authorized delegate. IT IS FURTHER AGREED that said Principal and said Surety shall indemnify and save harmless the State of New York, Department of Transportation, from all liability, damages and expenses of every kind and nature, resulting directly or Indirectly to persons or property and arising from and in consequence of any license or permit, and shall well, truly and faithfully perform the duties and privileges pertaining to any license or permit and shall restore such State highways to their original conditions. IT IS FURTHER AGREED that said Principal and said Surety shall further Indemnify, save harmless and pay the New York State Department of Transportation, any damages, loss, charges or expenses which shall, in any way, be sustained or incurred by It In relation to or in connection with any and all such claims, actions, suits or proceedings at law or in equity. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, said Principal has hereunto set his hand and seal and said Surety has caused this instrument of writing to be executed. SIGNED, sealed and dated this 25th Day of May (month), 20 11 (year). This Bond takes effect may 25th 2011 (date) and shall remain in full force until the work is satisfactorily completed and accepted. Gemstar Construction Corp. International Fidelity Insurance Company PRINCIPAL SURETY (NOTE: If D8A also provide Name of Legal Entity and Copy of "Certificate of Conducting Business under an assumed Name" that was filed In County Clerk's Office, e. g. John Jones dbo Jones Trucking) BY: Attomey-in-Fact Theresa A Lanfranco BY: Address: 125 -Froehlich Farm Blvd. (Company Seal) Woodbury, NY 11797 Address: 83 Jewett Avenue Note: Attach Power of Attorney, Financial Statement and acknowledgement by Staten Island, NY 10302 representative of the Surety showing his/her powers to execute such instrument. Telephone No.: Telephone No.: NYSDOT PERM 44 (rev. 9/10) } state of v County of ss. v00 On this day of 120 , before me >v personally came to me known, :U; and known to me to bathe in di via ua s escri a ;n an w o execute the foregoing co instrument, and acknowledged tome that _he_ executed the same. 0 ' O My commission expires ,otary u ;c State of r Ss. County of m On this day of 2C, before me a Lm personally came to me known, u.3 ' and known to me to be a member of the firm of CC described in and who executed the foregoing ;n rumen , an a ereupon o acknowledged to me that he executed the same as and for the act and deed of said a firm. My commission expires Notary u iq State of as. V County of eg On this day of 20--., before me ra personally came to me known, cv who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that _he is the a3 1-0 of 0 c the corporation described in an which executed e above ins umen a he C3= '4 1 < corporate seal; that iit cwas oso~affffixed' byhorderl of the Board ofnDiirrectors of said corporation and that _he signed his/her name thereto by like order. My commission expires . Notary Public State of New York as. County of Nassau u On this 25th day of May , 20_L; before me M a personally came Theresa A Lanfranco to me Known, t m who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that' she Is an attorney-In-fact of yo International Fidelity Insurance Com an , c Tne corporation x u wi in I nsxr en that e o knows the corporate seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed 'to the witiS n instrumentissuchcorporateseal;andthat hesignedthesa'dinstrumentandaffixed the said seal as attorney-in-fact by authority of the Board of Directors of said corporation and by authority of this office under the Standing Resolutions thereof. My commission expires Notary Public lye/LIN~y 0`•N! O Ci!1 , R1 jI iTEI NA YON FIDE~.TTY INSURAIITC 10, W Y` HOME UFk7Ce ONB NBVdr~RT( CENTER20TH 4 0.01% BWARIC::TIBW JBRS$Y •07102 3207 i ; KNOW ALL bW BY THESE PRHS,lVir & TbalINTERNATIONAL FIUSLtTY INSURANCE COMPANYwa , a owporadou organized and exLahig 4W of tbe State pXNaw jersl- end bevir*110"T ii'm 1 ot~ ire tbuCiry oI'Newark Now Teraey does hereby coned appoint s..i.14... .t.. ^µY yy ,['4. w• 1.....w. .w s.. rN Mr ..h.... , 4, r I SCO RAYMOND.C. CAUTAN,'LI$A W SC01TO THERPSA A. LANRRANt^O,. t' DORMYH E BLFAWAt. Woodbury„NY. ' its true and bwful anomey(s& fact us execute. seal and deliver for and on its bebelf as surly, an and all bonds and uderoddriga contracts of kdomruny and - :other wrkhga obSgaaory m mitre thereof which ate at may be allowed .,required or perm by law mture rub tlen cowOO or sod - execntlen of mclr iMhument(s) N parent o< gmao shall' be '.se binamg ppoa the aa~d O'ff$RNAAL FIDELITY ~CE MPANY'sa illy and **y,,, to all imams and„puglpwe, opr if ie sawleel been duly escuted end poJmowledged by, regularly,a)cted officers at its ipal ofljt'e..4• oof INTERN A NAL FIU&W'1YiNSI RAO~MNC~, COMPANY atiy ulk4 endkheld lib ~yeot FW tny.ol174 by the Board of Diracions The president oat !N! Via~PseaWent. Bxecutlv0 Via Prcsidcut, Secretary or Assistant Semeury', shall have power and authority (1) To appoint Artoreeys-In-tact, and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attoeb the Seal of the Company deereoo, bonds and _ undeiriakirnp; commeu of indemnity. and odor writings obligatory In the nature thereof and. - - (2) To remove, at any dune, any such attorney-in-faer and mvoke the authority given. NntOar this Power. of Ammrnntaeyy Is sinned and-sealed by hesbulle=auto resolution of the Board of Directors of said Company adopted at a meaning duly celled and field on lire 291h dsy of April, t992 of which dakkfol owing is-e true excerpt: Now dumfom the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Poway-of anmmey, many certificates rebtiog thereon by facsimile, sad any such power of sweet" or cerdileals bearing each foceimile signatures or heshalle an shall be valid and blodul upon she Company and any such power so execaled and cerdBdl by fasimile signatures aM fscsua9e seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in Itra Ibmue wilt respect an any bond or undertaking. to which it. is attached. O~TY / IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, INTERNATIONAL FmR1.1T'Y INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this instrument an be c~\ G signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by Its authorized olicer, this 161h day or October, A.D. 2007. W E l~ TERNATIONAL FWKLXrY INSURANCE COMPANY ,a. STATE NNW JERSEY -aLl'1,a~rr ~0 County of f Essex EM' . Secretary:..... . On this 16th Any of October 2007 before an came da individual who executed rho ng inatnuraen to me rsosaly known aM, being b]r me ddy swore, aid da he b she amai t dearn`bed and authoti:ed ofiloar of the IN7'RRNATIONAL FIDELiTX COMPANY: that the malalkW to d ktmumeot is the Corporals Seal of said Company; that the. sold Corporate Seal and bit signature were duly alized by ;order of the Board of Directors of said company.- IN wP' RQGF At she City TESTIMONY Nware ~ierasey a day and ~ you m my first above veer um oma.l sent. y NOTARY PUBLIC. ~;,cWag % ' :ANOTXRYPUBWCOFNIINfJBRSRY~., My Cormpisaion Hxpired.Noy 21 2010.. CERTIFICATION G Ute uodeeaigned offtear of INTERNATIONAL FIDEIITY INSURANCE COMPANY do booby aniy that I have joni iered the looping coq! of rho of Adomay sad alGlpyi(,-gtd [hec»py of the Seedmt of tla By.Iaws of Yd. Company is let ft* in acid Power ofAUOmey with tpe Ot101NA1S ON THE HOMty~liPICE OB,SA•ID COMPM and "'die same itWoonrect uaiseriptrtbereoft.emf of da whola of do slid ongrNb,~pd dot the saM Pear land effect 4Adamey la )sot been revoked and 6 now (9 (u0 Ionic > s!' > rs r* IN TFSMONY WHilklbP,1 have Birettas ter my.hand thii . day of. MRY :~LoU , . , tin. Ti. , .f. q fF' ' Kll -k .lieh t 1 h • ~ E ~ Auisa Sewerarv: INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY ONE NEWARK CENTER, 20TH FLOOR NEWARK, NEW JERSEY 07102-5207 STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES, SURPLUS AND OTHER FUNDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 ASS Bonds (Amortized Value) 546,649,126 Common Stocks (Market Value) 62,328576 Mortgage Loans on Real Estate 167,950 Cash & Bank Deposits 97.628.047 Short Term Investments 1.544.986 Other Invested Assets 435,828 Unpaid Premiums & Assumed Balances 7,067.426 Reinsurance Recoverable Ironh Reinsurers 2,9811958 Electronic Data Processing Equipment 338,089 Investment Income Due and Accrued 263,824 Current Federal & Foreign Income Tax Recoverable& Interest Thereon... 589,361 Net Deferred Tax Assets 4,800,000 Receivables from Parent, Subsidiaries and Affiliates 912,570 Other Assets 2.287.918 TOTAL ASSETS S22,%22 .6SB LIABILITIES. SURPLUS & OTHER FUNDS Losses (Reported Lasses Net as to Reinsurance Ceded and Incurred But Not Reported Losses) $16,572,784 Loss Adjustment Expenses 4.990,366 Contingent Commissions & Other Similar Charges 5,064,116 Other Expenses (Excluding Taxes, Lcenses and Fees) 3,142,789 Taxes, Licenses & Fees (Excluding Federal Income Tax) 284,768 Unearned Premiums 30,50,137 Dividends Declared & Unpaid: Policyholders 500,000 Ceded Reinsurance Premiums Payable 2,529,630 Funds Held by Company under Reinsurance Treaties 1,031 Amounts Withheld by Company for Account of Others 71,612,437 Provisions for Reinsurance 7,104 Payable to Parent, Subsidiaries and Affiliates 73,243 Other Liabilities 6.721 TOTAL LIABILITIES Sti5.294.626 Common Capital Stock St,S 000 Cross Paid-in & Contributed Surplus 374,600 Surplus Note i6,0oo,006 Unassigned Funds (Surplus) 77,831.432 Less: Treasury Stock at cost (22,333 shares common) (value Ind. $45.) 11005.1100 Surplus as Regards Policyholders 994.701.032 TOTAL LIABILITIES, SURPLUS & OTHER FUNDS 529.995.658 I, Francis L Mitterhoff, President of INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, certify that the foregoing is a fair statement of Assets, Liabilities, Surplus and Other Funds of this Company, at the dose of business, December 31, 2010, as reflected by its books and records and as reported in its statement on file with the Laurance Department of the State of New Jersey. t1t?gy IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have set my hand and affixed the ,IFr seal of the Company, this 241E day of February, 2011. INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY Lanza, Heather • From: Lanza, Heather Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 20114:25 PM To: 'betsy@mooreattys.com' Cc: Pat Subject: RE: GAMA-Mattitutck 7-11 Betsy and Pat, Here are the questions from the Planning Board. 1. Submit copies of the existing bonds with the details of what is covered by them. 2. By what specific date will the radius work definitely be completed? 3. Absent a specific date that your client can guarantee, can you provide letters from the NYSDOT, Verizon, Cablevision and any others involved that acknowledge the situation and state that they will get it done by a certain date, say May 31s`, 2012 or sooner? 4. What draft language would you suggest for conditions that could be attached to a conditional certificate of occupancy? 5. What evidence is there that the operation of the site prior to the radius being completed will be safe? 6. Will the applicant also post a bond to the Town for the radius work (or add the Town to the existing bond if possible)? Call or write back with any questions or clarifications you might need. Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: heather. lanza_town.southold.nv.us From: betsy(almooreattvs.com fmailto:betsy@)mooreattys.comj Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 20112:33 PM To: Lanza, Heather Cc: pat Subject: GAMA-Mattitutck 7-11 Hi, Heather. Just following up on the list of questions the Board was going to put together so that we can gather the requested information immediately. Thank you. 1 Betsy Perkins LA • Moore Law Offices William D. Moore, Esq. 631.765.4663 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 631.765.4330 mailing 6 physical address: 51020 Main Road Southold NY 11971 fax number for both 631.765.4643 2 • 0 Cummings, Brian A. From: Cummings, Brian A. Sent: Monday, November 07, 201112:33 PM To: Bill Cremers (billcre@optonline.net); Donald Wilcenski (don@briarcliffsod.com); James Rich (JamesRich3@optonline.net); Ken Edwards (Pappy@FishersIsland.net); Martin Sidor (SIDOR@optonline.net) Cc: Lanza, Heather Subject: Mattituck 7-11 Site Visit Here are some noted observations made from the Mattituck 7-11 site visit conducted the morning of November 4`" 1. Not all parking lot light posts included shielding. Approximately six (6) were constructed with them and three (3) were not. 2. No light fixture has been included on the approved sign at the corner of Factory Ave and NYS Rt. 25, however, an electrical source is at the base of the sign. A gooseneck fixture was approved. 3. The improvements and construction to the corner radius between Factory Ave. and NYS Rt. 25 has not been completed nor has it begun. 4. The striping in front of the ingress/egress along NYS Rt. 25 was not finished after a recent roadwork asphalt patch. 5. There was some debris (mostly branches) behind the building, it was noted that it is necessary to keep this area clean. -A tree was split in half at the level of the roof behind the building, one half of the tree is resting in an adjacent tree while the other half is still upright, but is a hazard to the existing building or equipment below should it fall. Brian A. Cummings, Planner Southold Town Planning Department 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: brian.cummings town.southold.nv.us 1 Lanza, Heather • 40 From: Patricia C. Moore [pcmoorel@optonline.net] Sent: Monday, October 31, 20119:21 AM To: Lanza, Heather Subject: Fwd: RE: NYSDOT Highway Work Permit 20111026104, NY 25, Mattituck, 7-Eleven Attachments: 01-099p l 1 copy. pdf Please see attached letter copied to Chairman Sidor & Highway Superintendent Harris. Please advise the Board. See you at 4:00 pm. Pat Original Message Subject:RE: NYSDOT Highway Work Permit 20111026104, NY 25, Mattituck, 7-Eleven Date:Mon, 31 Oct 201108:20:38 -0400 From:Wolfgang, Mark (DOT) <mwolfgana(@,dot.state.nv.us> To:Patricia C. Moore <pcmoorel (a)optonline.net> Good Morning Pat, Please see attached. Thank you, Mark Mark D. Wolfgang Civil Engineer I NYSDOT Traffic Engineering & Safety 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Rm 6A-7 Hauppauge, NY 11788 Office (631) 952-7973 Fax (631) 952-4967 Mobile (631) 978-1671 From: Patricia C. Moore [mailto:DcmoorelOootonline.netl Sent: Friday, October 28, 20119:34 AM To: Wolfgang, Mark (DOT); Jimmy Bruck Subject: RE: NYSDOT Highway Work Permit 20111026104, NY 25, Mattituck, 7-Eleven The signs noted on the punch list have been completed and SCWA has on their schedule for today to complete the patching, weather permitting. The contractor has requested a site inspection from Kevin. I am meeting with the Planning Board on Monday. We have worked hard to get everything done immediately. Could you please forward me your letter by Monday. Thank you. Pat 1 ~c SU*OLK COUNTY LEGISLARE t LEN ,4 ~~J~ G9m a p~ff=zo cog EDWARD P. ROMAINE LEGISLATOR 1 ST DISTRICT October 31, 2011 Mr. Martin Sidor, Chairman Southold Planning Department Southold Town P.O. Box 1179 - 3 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Sidor and the Southold Planning Department Members, Earlier this week, I was contacted by Tony Coccio concerning the 7-11 store in Mattituck. As you know, this site had previously been developed as a gas, service station. The owner has greatly improved the property and addressed traffic safety with a detailed , traffic study, which concluded that the 7-11 would not adversely affect safety. The owner also agreed to gift the intersection to New York State and cut back the radius of the curve. A property owner who offers valuable land to New York state to correct a road condition which has existed for over 50 years should not be financially damaged for their cooperation with the State of New York. It is my understanding that the New York State Department of Transportation has the responsibility to determine and to address the safety concerns on Route 25, particularly as they relate to the road improvements and curb cuts that are appropriate for the site. Similarly, the Planning Board site plan process addresses primarily the parking and internal circulation of traffic within the site but not the road improvements or curb cuts. In my discussions with Mr. Wolfgang of the NYSDOT Traffic and Safety Office, NYSDOT is satisfied that all the work to the radius can be complete after NYSDOT completes their obligations. The NYSDOT will be sending the Planning Board a letter, which states that they have no objection to the Building Department issuing a Conditional Certificate of Occupancy. New York State Department of Transportation is cooperating and does not want to interfere with a local business from opening due to their construction schedule. It is the State's policy to promote job creation and 8,local jobs,will be lost if this business does "not open immediately. Also, the, Town of Southold and County of Suffolk does not need another closed business, particularly when it is in our power to support the business. 423 GRIFFING AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 PHONE (631)852-3200 FAX (631)852-3203 Finally, the 7-11 building and the site improvements which can be completed have been completed and the operator/owner (Mr. Tony Coccio) is ready to open. I would respectively request that the Planning Board complete a final inspection of the site and authorize the building department to issue a conditional certificate of occupancy subject to six conditions outlined in Mr. Wolfgang's attached letter. I thank the Board members for allowing me to petition them on this matter Sincerely, Edward P. Romaine County Legislator, 15` District EPR: cqm cc: Supervisor Scott Russell Southold Town Board 10/26/2011 11:51 631-952- 67 NYSDOT R10 TRAF* PAGE 01/01 FAX COVER SHEET NYS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION 10 TRAFFIC c& SAFETY M - FAX: 631-952-4967 PHONE: 631-952-7973 TO: Honorable Edward P. Romaine Phone: 631-852-3200 Suffolk County Legislator Fax: 631.852.3203 District 1 FROM: M. Wolfgang, NYSDOT, Traffic & Safety, Highway Work Permits RE: Highway Work Permit 20111026104, NY 25, Mattituck, 7-Eleven DATE: 10/26/2011 The following items shall be completed before we can Issue a letter that states we have no objection to the Town of Southold issuing a conditional Certificate of Occupancy: 1) Sign 114-7, (symbolic "keep right of island"), Is supposed to be double sided for ingress and egress traffic, Only one side has been placed. 2) In the area between the curb and sidewalk just east of Factory Avenue on the north side of NYS Rte2S, there was an existing sign designating "Nc Stopping Any Time" sign with a double headed arrow. This sign was not there at the time of inspection and must be replaced. 3) At the exit lane from 7-11 onto NYS Rte 25, the plan shows a "Stop" sign and a symbolic "No Left Turn" that are to be mounted on the same post by the exit stop bar. Only the "Stop" sign is there and the other sign was placed in error on the mainline. 4) According to plan, there is supposed to be a symbolic "No Left Turn" sign on the east side of the NYS Rte2S driveway to prohibit eastbound traffic from making a left turn into the 7-11 property. 5) There is a Suffolk County Water Authority excavation pit in the middle of the NYS Rte25 driveway area that has settled substantially and must be repaired. This work was done for the water service to the 7-11 property. 6) All sign posts must be replaced with galvanized steel posts. These items have been discussed with Gemstar site supervisor John and he has agreed to correct them. Our NYSDOT permit inspector will advise me when these items have been completed. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks, Mark Number of pages including this one: 1 Planning Board Site Inspec ion Record Project Name i i~ ~~1~ F (UC Tax Map# Date Attending: Purpose of site visit: Notes: o 101 6n Sipn e IeJric S rce . 9-x4.;C-e are here s1n~eC11& CV1 Sot AC 1c wpc4s Gam' ry)~ o(krs ? w/~ 3 b Cm( a(qj- clean. `&-wch cbe,>n a4- !24 vvsi4-I wL.sI be CepL,,OL Q. -p((i-~ fee Icectty 6-6nJ builai IV A -zoO fa S{ai P' on (ZE -75 in cnc CampO e~,4~a~~e on rece?~~ pa{~l~ MS4 Reporting Illicit discharge on or near site? Y or N If Yes, briefly describe: (provide copy of this report to Town Stormwater Manager) Planning Board Work Session • Page Two • October 31. 2011 1iCk J SCTM# j 1000-142 1 27 - - - - Project name We _ 1Ei11 corner of Facto _ r~ Avenue &NYS Route 25, Mattituck Location Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,985 s.f. gas station/convenience j store to a 2,670 s.f. convenience store (constructing a 685 s.f. addition) on a 24,829 s.f. parcel in the B Zone located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. j ---s - Statu I Approved Site Plan pending final inspection Action I Review request for final site --inspection. _ -m- - Attachents Letter requesting final site inspection [ Proj-01.1--l-0-ii me: ~ Colony Pond SCTM#: 1000-52-5-60.3 I - - - Location: on the s/s/o Colony Road, approximately 470' e/o Bayview Avenue, in ..j Southold - - Description: This proposal is for a standard subdivision to subdivide a 13.540-acre I parcel into five lots where Lot 1 = 0.8 ac., Lot 2 = 7.7 ac., including a 1 ac. building envelope and 6.8 acres of preserved Open Space, and Lots 3, 4, & 5 = 0.7 ac. in the R-80 Zonin-District. - r - Status: Conditional Sketch Approval - - - - - _ - - Action: - a_Review_issues raised at the public hearing_ Attachments_ Staff Report _ - - , Project name Mellas & Smith lSCTM#: i 1000-79-6 4 6 & 29 - - - - Location 935 Jacobs Lane & 340 Colonial Road-, Southold - - - Description: This proposed Lot Line Change will transfer 9,626 sq. ft. from j SCTM#1000-79-6-4.6 to SCTM#1000-79-6-29. Lot 29 will increase from 15,000 sq. ft. to 24,626 sq. ft., and Lot 4.6 will decrease from 96,747 sq. ft. to 87,121 sq. ft. Lot 29 is located in the R-40 Zoning District and Lot 11 4.6 is located in the A-C Zoning District. r----'---_...---------.-.-.-....----- -----I--------- Status: Pending - - - - -.a Action Review draft deeds consider granting Final Approval on 11/14/11 j . - Attachments Staff Report - ............._...........------.-------_-----i -----------------------------.-.-.._.----._._..---...-r.. - - I Project name_ Neumann, James 1 SCTM#:_l 1000-1.07-1-1..1, 107-1-1.2 .-.-._-j Location Mattituck Creek and Mill Road Mattituck Description: This proposal is to subdivide a 24.9 acre parcel into 5 lots. The parcel a borders Mattituck Creek in the R-80 Zone. One residence already exists. j I Status: Pendm~ - - - - - - - Action. Review ma s submitted - - 1 - . Attachments: I Staff Report - Project name r Stanton, Phil & Jenni fer [SCTM#: 1000 64_1-29 - Location Maple Lane, Southold - - Description: This proposal is for a 3 lot standard subdivision in the R-40 Zoning j District. - - Pre-submission Action Review concept plan submitted Attachments Staff Report 2731-4,STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. JOAN WIDONALD REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMIS$IOMi.R October 31, 2011 NOV - 2 2011 Ms. Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Your October 25, 2011 Letter Proposed 7-11 Convenience Store 9945 Main Road NY 25, Mattituck SCTM 1000-14200-0100-027000 Our Case No. 01-099P Highway Work Permit #20111026104 Dear Ms. Moore. We are writing in response to your subject submission. The Highway Work Permit (HWP) holder has made significant access improvements at the site location. The property owner has committed to us for a property donation. The remaining work at this location required by the HWP holder (NY 25 / Factory Avenue radius improvements and pavement markings on NY 25 and Factory Ave.) cannot be completed until we re-locate the utility pole(s) and traffic control signal pedestrian pole. We are working with the utility companies and our signal contractor for the pole relocations and we anticipate this work will be completed in the spring, 2012. Inasmuch as we are in agreement with the mitigation measures proposed and believe that all involved are working diligently towards a resolution that will not compromise public safety on the State highway, we have no objection to the Town of Southold issuing a Certificate of Occupancy, conditional on the HWP holder's timely completion of the NY 25 / Factory Avenue radius improvement and pavement marking changes, following the pole relocations we committed to. Ms. Patricia C. Moore • • October 31, 2011 Page 2 of 2 In order to ensure that all public safety concerns relating to traffic have been addressed when the HWP holder completes all required site improvements, we request, by copy of this letter, that the Town of Southold please contact us prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY SHAJKA. SAA~ SHAIK A. SAA , P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: ly1r. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold r. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:mm dr,„M VVV STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 1 1 788-551 8 r SUSIMAL CHAKRASORTI, P.E. JOAN MGDONALD RX016NAL DIRSCTOR COMM19410,ItR October 31, 2011 Ms. Patricia C. Moore OCT 3 1 2011 Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 xour October 25.'2011 Letter Proposed 7-11 Convenience Store 9945 Main Road NY 25. Mattituck SCTM 1000-14200-0100-027000 Our Case No. 01-099P Hiehwav Work Permit #20111026104 Dear Ms. Moore: We are writing in response to your subject submission. The Highway Work Permit (HWP) holder has made significant access improvements at the site location. The property owner has committed to us for a property donation. The remaining work at this location required by the HWP holder (NY 25 / Factory Avenue radius improvements and pavement markings on NY 25 and Factory Ave.) cannot be completed until we re-locate the utility pole(s) and traffic control signal pedestrian pole. We are working with the utility companies and our signal contractor for the pole relocations and we anticipate this work will be completed in the spring, 2012. Inasmuch as we are in agreement with the mitigation measures proposed and believe that all involved are working diligently towards a resolution that will not compromise public safety on the State highway, we have no objection to the Town of Southold issuing a Certificate of Occupancy, conditional on the HWP holder's timely completion of the NY 25 / Factory Avenue radius improvement and pavement marking changes, following the pole relocations we committed to. Ms. Patricia C. Moore October 31, 2011 Page 2 of 2 In order to ensure that all public safety concerns relating to traffic have been addressed when the HWP holder completes all required site improvements, we request, by copy of this letter, that the Town of Southold please contact us prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Ver ly yours, AIR A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Mr. Peter Hams, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Mr. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:mm 0/31/2011 10:29 6318523203 LEGISLATOR ROPE PAGE 01 • 423 Griffing Avenue, Suite 2 Riverhead, NY 11901 PhOne:(631)852-3200 Fax! (631) 852-3203 District II~~ Prom: OCZ 31 2011 Date; Pax Nmber: 76 S- 3136 N a l.co r: 10/31/2011 10:29 6318523203 LEGISLATOR ROVE PAGE 02 SUFFOLK COUNTY LEGISLATURE t tears ` W N~a 0a EDWARD P. ROMAINE LEGISLATOR f ST DISTRICT October 31, 2011 Mr. Martin Sidor, Chairman OCT 3 1 2011 Southold Planning Department Southold Town P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Sidor and the Southold Planning Department Members, Earlier this week, I was contacted by Tony Coccio concerning the 7-11 store in Mattituck. As you know, this site had previously been developed as a gas service station. The owner has greatly improved the property and addressed traffic safety with a detailed traffic study, which concluded that the 7-11 would not adversely affect safety. The owner also agreed to gift the intersection to New York State and cut back the radius of the curve. A property owner who offers valuable land to New York state to correct a road condition which has existed for over 50 years should not be financially damaged for their cooperation with the State of New York. It is my understanding that the New York State Department of Transportation has the responsibility to determine and to address the safety concerns on Route 25, particularly as they relate to the road improvements and curb cuts that are appropriate for the site. Similarly, the Planning Board site plan process addresses primarily the parking and internal circulation of traffic within the site but not the road improvements or curb cuts. In my discussions with Mr. Wolfgang of the NYSDOT Traffic and Safety Office, NYSDOT is satisfied that all the work to the radius can be complete after NYSDOT completes their obligations. The NYSDOT will be sending the Planning Board a letter, which states that they have no objection to the Building Department issuing a Conditional Certificate of Occupancy. New York State Department of Transportation is cooperating and does not want to interfere with a local business from opening due to their construction schedule. It is the State's policy to promote job creation and 8 local jobs will be lost if this business does not open immediately. Also, the Town of Southold and County of Suffolk does not need another closed business, particularly when it is in our power to support the business. 423 GRIPPING AVENUE RIVERHEAO,Ny 11907 PHONE (631)652-3200 FAX (631)6523203 iy 10/31/2011 10:29 6318523 03 LEGISLATOR ROW PAGE 03 Finally, the 7-11 building and the site improvements which can be completed have been completed and the operator/owner (Mr. Tony Coccio) is ready to open. I would respeclively request that the Planning Board complete a final inspection of the site and authorize the building department to issue a conditional certificate of occupancy subject to six conditions outlined in Mr. Wolfgang's attached letter. I thank the Board members for allowing me to petition them on this matter ggSi~~neerely~~, Edward P. Romaine County Legislator, 180 District EPR: cqm cc: Supervisor Scott Russell Southold Town Board 10/31/2011 10:29 6318523203 LEGISLATOR ROM E PAGE 04 10/26/2011 11:51 6310-4967 NYSDOT R10 TR PAGE 01/01 FAX COVER SHM NYS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION 10 TRAFFIC & SAFETY PAX: 631-952^4967 PHONE: 631-R52-7973 TO: Honorable Edward P. Romaine Phone: 631-852-3200 Suffolk County Legislator Fax: 631.852.3203 District 1 ' FROM: M. Wolfgang, NYSDOT, Traffic & Safety, Highway Work Permits RL: Highway Work Permit 20111026104. NX 25, Mattituck, 7-Eleven DATE: 10/26/2011 The following items shall be completed before we can issue a letter that states we have no objection to the Town of Sowthold issuing it conditional Certificate of Occupancy: 1) Sign R4-7, (symbolic "keep right of island"), is supposed to be double sided for ingress and egress traffic, On y one side has been placed, 2) In the area between the curb and sidewalk just east of Factory Avenue on the north side of NYS fite25, there was an existing sign designating "No Stopping Any Time" sign with a double headed arrow. This sign was not there at the time of inspection and must be replaced. 3) At the exit lane from 7-11 onto NYS Rte 25, the plan shows a'Stop" sign and a symbolic "No Left Turn" that are to be mounted on the same post by the exit stop bar. Only the "Stop" sign is there and the other sign was placed in arroron the mainline. 4) According to plan, there is supposed to be a symbolic "Noteft Tum'sign on the east side of the NYS Rte25 driveway to prohibit eastbound traffic from making a left tum into the 741 property. 5) There Is a Suffolk County Water Authority excavation pit in the middle of the NYS Rte23 driveway area that has settled substantially and must be repaired. This work was done for the water service to the 7-11 property. 6) All sign posts must be replaced with galvanized steel posts, These Items have been discussed with Gurnstar site supervisor John and he has agreed to correct them. our NYSAOT permit inspector will advise me when these items have been completed. Tf you have any questions please )et tae know. Thanks, Mark Number of pages including this one: I `11312011 15:36 MOORE LAW OFFICES ~A1q~117654643 P.0021002 • ' c ' J KS~ PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Maio, Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax! (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Batsy Perkins Secretaries October 13, 2011 Southold Town Planning Board Martin Sidor, Chairman and Board 53095 Main Road OCT 1 4 2011 P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: GAMA Deer Park (741),-Mattituck SCTM41000-142-1-27 Dear W. Sidor: We would respectfully request that the Planning Board staff make an inspection of the property. All of the workwWch the owner is obligated to complete has been completed and the 7-11 operator/owner (Mr. Tony Coccio) is ready to open, We need to discuss the time line for the radius improvements, the NYSDOT is responsible fortherelocation oftheutility poles andtrafficsignal work. We have two performance bonds posted guarantying the land dedication and the radius modification. We can not complete this work until NYSDOT completes their obligations. NYSDOT can not complete their work until the Spring. NYSDOT has inspected the work performed to date and we believe that they have no objection to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Very truly yours, Patricia C, Moore ec: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. 10I13l2011 15:36 MOORE LAW OCES 17654643 P.0011002 4r PATRICIA C. MOORE Attomey at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 7654330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET The pages comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information from Patricia C. Moore. This information is intended solely for use by the individual entity named as the recipient hereof. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange to retrieve this transmission at no cost to you. TO: lF ~/j~emtit ~F ~ / lOS ^ 3 / 3 cO RE : &04Mq 00XZ4 (T~k (7 ~l / cr lc.Yr c.~ DATE: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET Cq IF TRANSMISSION IS FAULTY OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ~j \ CLIENT NAME: l9 kz:cir_ Aa~ltk (r7^/l ) OPERATOR: f7~iy 9 • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS a SoVryO P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS G C Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS • ~O 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H. RICH III ly~U (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI~ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 4, 2011 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Approved Site Plan for 7-Eleven Store Located at the corner of NYS Rt. 25 and Factory Avenue, Mattituck SCTM#:1000-142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore: Please be advised that following a conversation with Jim Sieda of East End Nurseries, the Planning Board has granted a change in the approved landscape plan with regard to the species of accepted street trees. The Planning Board will accept the planting of Blue Spruce Evergreens at six (6) to eight (8) feet in height, in lieu of the previously approved twelve (12) Red Spruces (Picea Ruben). Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Brian A. Cummings Planner cc: Jim Sieda NOTE TO FILE Date: October 4, 2011 Prepared by: Brian Cummings Follow up to site visit with Jamie Richter where the landscape plan was discussed and addressed with the site foreman regarding requirements made by the Planning Board and recent revisions: 1. While on site, the screening of the north property line and/or back of the building was discussed. The Foreman agreed to plant a line of evergreens to screen the back of the building and property. The Landscape Plan requires the applicant to preserve as much natural vegetation as possible during construction, but replace all that is removed with evergreen screening. 2. The landscape foreman Jim Sieda requested a change in street tree species due to the difficulty of locating the approved Red Spruce trees. Staff had a conversation with Planning Board member Don Wilcenski where it was decided that Blue Spruce may replace the Red Spruce for approved street trees. A letter has been sent. STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 1 1 788-551 8 www.nysdot.gov SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. JOAN MCDONALD REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER May 16, 2011 MAY 2 3 2011 Mr. Vincent Angelo Corrado, P.E., Associate Engineer Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. 60 Main Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Your March 7, 2011 Submission Proposed 7-11 Convenience Store 9945 Main Road NY 25, Mattituck SCTM 1000-14200-0100-027000 Our Case No. 01-099P Dear Mr. Corrado: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site's access and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. Issuance of a Highway Work Permit is subject to a commitment from the property owner for the transfer of property to the State of New York. This may be accomplished by posting a bond with our Right of Way Group in an amount equal to the property value. This issue should be addressed with Mr. Bruce Branigan. He may be contacted at 631- 952-6092 or by email at bbranigan@dot.state.nv.us. Site plan approval for highway work permit issuance is contingent upon our receipt of all of the following items within six (6) months of the date of this letter and no further revisions are made to the plans once we approve them. If the Highway Work Permit will be secured by anyone other than the property owner, i.e. contractor, the applicant must provide a signed letter from the property owner stating the applicant is authorized to act on behalf of the property owner in this matter. The letter must also include the property owner's mailing address and telephone number. Mr. Vincent Angelo Corrado . • May 16, 2011 Page 2 of 2 Kindly submit four (4) sets of the approved plans plus one (1) electronic, microstation compatible, version of the plans along with the permit fee and surety bond. Permit fee, Protective Liability Insurance and Surety Bond (Perm 44e) requirements are listed below. A Highway Work Permit Application (Perm 33) shall be completed and returned to us. The same party must secure the Highway Work Permit application, completed Perm 17 (not applicable if the fee option is chosen) and the Surety Bond. All referenced forms may be accessed and downloaded from our website at www.nysdot.gov. On the NYSDOT A-Z Site Index select "H" and then select Highway Work Permits. All checks issued to the State of New York must show a Federal Identification Number. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): $550.00 Bond Amount: $75,000.00 Insurance Fee: $175.00 or Perm 17 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By Melik Tariq SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Mr. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:ajf i r MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~~OF SOpryo P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair y T OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS u+ ac Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. JAMES H. RICH ~ DS ^0 Q 54375 State Route 25 DONALD J. WILCENSKI lyCO (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 16, 2011 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Endorsed Site Plans: Gama Deer Park (7-11, Mattituck) Located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Zoning Districts: Business Dear Ms. Moore: Enclosed please find a copy of the approved site plan for the above-referenced application which has been endorsed by the Chairman. The condition of the approval granted on December 13, 2010 has been met. Please note that the Planning Board's final inspection and the subsequent Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until after the NYSDOT has notified the Planning Board that they are satisfied that all the work on the intersection improvement as noted on the plan has been completed. Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to site plans: 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries, and to shield the light from the sky. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Approved site plans are valid for three years from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 4. Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval. 6 Seven-Eleven Pave Two February 16, 2011 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Board or its representative, must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the approved site plan and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the approved site plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman cc: Town Engineer Building Department T MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~14F soojy P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~0~ OlG Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS • 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI COU Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1838 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 14, 2010 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Final Approval: Gama Deer Park (7-11, Mattituck) Located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Zoning Districts: Business Dear Ms. Moore: The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, December 13, 2010, adopted the following resolutions: WHEREAS, this site plan is to convert an existing 1,985 s.f. gas station/convenience store to a 2,670 s.f. convenience store (constructing a 685 s.f. addition) on a 23,891 s.f. parcel; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2009, the NYS Department of Transportation commented that traffic demand from the site will place more of a demand on the west bound to north bound right turn movements and as such, the applicant should complete a radius improvement as part of the site development; and WHEREAS, it has been agreed that the applicant will dedicate 249 s.f. to the NYS Department of Transportation to improve the radius of the turn at the northeast corner of the intersection, and will be responsible for site improvements and the cost for the radius improvements, and the NYS DOT will undertake the cost of re-locating the utility and pedestrian traffic control facilities; and WHEREAS, an application for a site plan was submitted on April 7, 2009, including the site plan prepared by Eugene Kempey, P.E., dated February 25, 2009; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2009, the Southold Town Planning Board accepted the application for review; and Gama Deer Park 7-11 Page Two December 14. 2010 WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) (6 NYCRR, Part 617.5 (c) (3) has determined that the proposed action is a Type II Action as it falls within the following description for (6 NYCRR, Part 617.5 (c) (7): "construction expansion of a primary non-residential structure or facility involving less than 4,000 s.f. of gross floor area and not involving change of zone or a use variance and not subject to further review under SEQRA; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2009, the Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 C., distributed the application to agencies having jurisdiction for their comments, and the following agencies responded: Town Engineer, Architectural Review Committee, Southold Transportation Commission, Mattituck Fire District and Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Coordinator, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, NYS DOT; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2009, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 C., distributed the application to the Suffolk County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, on June 13, 2009, the comments were received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission and the site plan was determined to be a matter of local determination; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2009, the Town Engineer reviewed the site plan and commented that the applicant has incorporated all the relevant engineering comments and satisfied the DOT issues with regard to the site design and reached an agreement with the work in the State right-of-way; and WHEREAS, on June 18, 2009, the Southold Town Architectural Review Committee reviewed and recommended the following design elements: The street sign should be a monument style sign no more than 6' in height with no internal lighting and goose-neck style light fixture on the sign, the use of a stone facade matching the building at the base of the street sign, the use of a natural split-shake shingle on all of the gables on the building, the use of Dark Sky compliant simple goose-neck style parking lot lighting fixtures without scrolling along the neck, the use of 10" square columns along the front of the building with a stone pedestal at the base of each column to complement the stone on the building, thicken the front arches between each column to complement the wider columns, change the colors of the building to the Nantucket Stacked Stone option with a complementing light gray-toned hearty plank above the stone; and WHEREAS, on June 29, 2009, the Mattituck Fire District recommended that all access points allow for fire access and allow for all access driveways be cleared and maintained to meet Town Code; and WHEREAS, on July 2, 2010, the Southold Town Transportation Commission recommended that all concerns have been met; and Gama Deer Park 7-11 Page Three December 14. 2010 WHEREAS, on July 17, 2009, the Town of Southold LWRP Coordinator reviewed the above-referenced project and has recommended that the proposed project is consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies; and WHEREAS, the comments from those agencies referenced above were received and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2009, a public hearing was held and the record was held open for an additional two weeks for written comments; and WHEREAS, the written record was closed on October 28, 2009; and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2010, the applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Dunn Engineering in connection with the site plan that was corroborated by an independent Traffic Engineering Firm (AKRF) hired by the Town; and WHEREAS, on August 2, 2010, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services issued a Permit (#C10-09-0007) and approved the project and stamped the site plan; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2010, written documentation was submitted that stated deliveries would not be accepted during peak hours of operation and would use only the entrance on the Main Road, not Factory Avenue; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-133 C, the Planning Board will not require the full 25' landscaped front yard. The Board has found this acceptable for the following reasons: that the subject parcel is an existing developed site with minimal existing landscaping, and as a result of this application, considerably more landscaping will be added; the applicant has proposed areas of front landscaping that are wider than 25' where feasible, with a landscape strip that varies throughout the site from 44 feet along the east property line to 8 feet along the Main Road; the average width of the front landscaped area equals approximately 25 ft. and the subject site's proposed landscaping will be an improvement to the area where many sites have minimal landscaping; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 B (5), has the discretion to vary or waive the parking requirements for site plan applications where doing so would not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety or general welfare, and will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and provision of the Site Plan Requirements chapter of the Town Code. 27 parking spaces are required on site, however, the Planning Board has found that this application is eligible for a small waiver of parking requirements of 2 parking spaces for the following reasons: the subject parcel is an existing developed site; the subject site will provide more parking than similar uses in the Town; the traffic study concluded that the site had Gama Deer Park 7-11 Page Four December 14, 2010 been designed to provide adequate on-site parking. Previously, there were 26 parking spaces proposed, the Planning Board has required the applicant to land bank one parking space closest to the entrance of Factory Ave to improve site circulation & safety (leaving 25 parking spaces); and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2010, the Planning Board accepted the Traffic Impact Analysis and concluded that the traffic report addressed the concerns raised from the Public Hearing regarding traffic issues and the safe operation of the site; and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2010, the Southold Town Chief Building Inspector reviewed and certified the proposed site plan as a permitted use in the Business Zoning District; and WHEREAS, all applicable requirements of the Site Plan Regulations Article XXIV, §280 - Site Plan Approval of the Town of Southold have been met; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) (6 NYCRR, Part 617.5 (c) (3), has determined that the proposed action is a Type II Action, and not subject to review under SEQR; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has reviewed the proposed action under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and determined that the action is consistent as outlined in the memo prepared by the LWRP Coordinator; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants approval with one condition to the site plan entitled 7-Eleven, Inc.", prepared by Eugene Kempey, P.E., originally dated February 25, 2009 and last revised on December 10, 2010, and including the following pages: • SP-01 Site & Drainage Plan • SP-02 Landscape Plan • SP-03 Site Detail • SP-04 Truck Routing Plan • SP-06 Aerial Photo Plan • PH-1 Site Lighting Plan • A-1 N &S Eelevations • A-2 E & W Elevations, and authorizes the Chairman to endorse the site plan packet after the following condition is met: 1. The applicant must submit a letter from NYS Department of Transportation stating they have no objections to site plan approval being granted prior to their Highway Work Permit being issued. • • Gama Deer Park 7-11 Page Five December 14, 2010 a. Please note: The Planning Board's final inspection and the subsequent Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until after the NYSDOT has notified the Planning Board that they are satisfied that all the work on the intersection improvement as noted on the plan has been completed. Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to site plans: 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries, and to shield the light from the sky. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Approved site plans are valid for three years from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 4. Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Board or its representative, must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the approved site plan and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the approved site plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman cc: Town Engineer Building Department MAILING ADDRESS: 9 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS x vif Somz. P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair 41 OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS rn Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDSGt~ 54375 State Route 25 . RICH III DON DSJ. WILCENSKI O~yCOU~n (cor. MaSout aYlo`uY Ave.) n Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD EMWED February _ 16, 2011 FEB 7 3 "1' BLDG. DEPT. Patricia C. Moore, Esq. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Endorsed Site Plans: Game Deer Park (7-11, Mattituck) Located on the We comer of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Zoning Districts: Business Dear Ms. Moore: Enclosed please find a copy of the approved site plan for the above-referenced application which has been endorsed by the Chairman. The condition of the approval granted on December 13, 2010 has been met. Please note that the Planning Board's final inspection and the subsequent Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until after the NYSDOT has noted the Planning Board that they are satisfied that all the work on the intersection improvement as noted on the plan has been completed. Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to site plans: 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries, and to shield the light from the sky. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Approved site plans are valid for three years from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 4. Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval. STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~j STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-SS18 SUSIMAL CHAKRASORTI, P.E. STANLEY GEE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ACTING COMMISSIONER February 2, 2011 FEB - 4 2011 Mr. Vincent Angelo Corrado, P.E. Associate Engineer - ` Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. 60 Main Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Your November 30, 2010 Submission Proposed 7-11 Convenience Store 9945 Main Road NY 25, Mattituck SCTM 1000-14200-0100-027000 Our Case No. 01-099P Dear Mr. Corrado: This is in regard to the information for the referenced project which was submitted to us for review. Inasmuch as we are in conceptual agreement with the mitigation measures proposed and believe that all involved are working diligently towards a resolution that will not compromise public safety on the State highway, we have no objection to the Town of Southold issuing a Building Permit for this site. In order to ensure that all public safety concerns relating to traffic have been addressed in the final site plans, we request by copy of this letter that the Town of Southold contact us prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Prior to an approval of the site work and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. In order to progress the property dedication at the subject site, please contact Mr. Bruce Branigan at (631) 952-6092 for further direction in this matter. The property dedication required to make the radius improvements may also be transferred to the Town of Mr. Vincent Angelo Corrado • • February 2, 2011 Page 2 of 2 Southold in lieu of the State. In either case, there must be documents in place prior to the issuance of a Highway Work Permit ensuring that the dedication process will be completed in a timely manner. 2. Left turn prohibition signs should be included in the plans. 3. An oversight was made during the previous review in which instruction was given to place the pedestrian movement crossing NY 25 during phase 3 operation. Instead, change the labeling of the pedestrian detectors push button from (301, 302) to (401, 402) and have the sequence diagram show the pedestrian operation during phase 4. Also the MSOS sheet should reflect these changes accordingly. 4. Please provide us with an engineers cost estimate for the work required within the NY 25 highway right-of-way, excluding the traffic control signal, so we can set the bond requirement for this site. 5. Please refer to the marked-up plans sheets for comments and corrections. Please submit five (5) copies of revised plans for our review, including the same number of site plans. In your response letter please state how the above comments are addressed, item by item. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject Case Number and County Tax Map number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, OriNinal Signed BY SImI$ A. AD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: X r. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold r. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:mm • • rb;0 ; OF SOUjyol Town Hall Annex Telephone (631) 765-1802 54375 Main Road 4 Fax (631) 765-9502 P.O. Box 1179 CZ; Southold, NY 11971-0959 ~~~OOUN'N 0 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairman FROM: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector DATE: December 13, 2010 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: 7-Eleven, Inc. 0 Location: NYS Road 25, Mattituck SCTM# 1000 - Section 142- Block 01 - Lot 27 Date: February 25, 2009 Revised Date: December 10, 2010 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 144 AND 280 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE Convenience Store IS A PERMITTED USE IN THIS B DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. Michael J.V 'ty Chief Building Inspector /)a Eugene G. Kempey, 0 LETTER OF TRANATAL 640 Sundse Highway West Babylon N.Y 11704 DATE: 12/10/10 Town of Southold Planning Board Office JOB NAME: Mattituck 7-11 Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY We are sending you x Attached _ Under separate cover via Fed Ex _ Shop Drawings _ Prints x Plans _ Samples _ Specifications - Copy of letter Change Order _ Other Copies Date No. Description SP-1, SP-2, SP-3, SP-4, SP-6, A-1, A-2, PH-1 7 12/10/10 Revised drawings per Planning Bd. work session on 12/6/10 and comments dated 12/7/10. 7 12/10/10 FORMAL WRITTEN RESPONSES These are transmitted as checked below X For Approval - Approved as submitted Resubmit _ copies for approval For your use _ Approved as noted Submit _ copies for approval As requested _ Returned for corrections _ return copies for approval FOR BIDS DUE CC: File, P. Moore, GAZ, DEA Signed: DIEGO STEISEL Eugene G. KempeY, P. E 640 Sunrise Highway W. Babylon, New York 11704 T. 631-321-7777 F. 631-661-0486 . December 10, 2010 Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Seven Eleven Store 9945 Main Road, NY 25 Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 Comments from the Planning Board work session dated 12/6/10 and comments dated 12/7/10: As a follow up to last nights Planning Board work session, below are the map changes that were discussed. Please make the following changes to the site plan and resubmit 7 copies directly to. the Planning. Department for review as soon as possible. Please contact me with any questions you may have. Parking spaces closest to Factory Ave entrance - options. Facts: Parking required: 27 @ 1/per 100sf (2,670sf) _ Parking proposed: 26 (including 1 ADA compliant., 1 land - banked stall) - (a) Remove one parking space closest to the entrance and land bank the parking space of Factory Ave to improve circulation safety (leaving 25 parking spaces) THE PARKING STALL IN QUESTION HAS BEEN ELIMINATED. REFER TO SHEET SP-1. TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED IS25..~ 1. Replace with landscaping and potentially widening the - entrance more for safety. STALL HAS BEEN REPLACED PRIMARILY WITH LANDSCAPING. THE FACTORY AVE. ENTRANCE HAS BEEN WIDENED FROM 34'-10" AT ITS WIDEST AND 28'-3" AT ITS NARROWEST POINTS TO 37'-2" AT ITS WIDEST AND 29'-2" AT ITS NARROWEST POINTS. 2. Land banking the parking space to be removed NO LANDBANKING PROVIDED. 3. The above requires a revision of the parking table and % landscape cover & landscape plan REVISIONS TO THE PARKING TABLES $ OF LANDSCAPE COVER 6 LANDSCAPING PLAN HAVE BEEN REVISED. Eugene G. Kempey, P. E. 640 Sunrise Highway W. Babylon, New York 11704 T. 631-321-7777F. 631-661-0486 q Notations on plan - corrections/changes - ALL APPROPRIATE NOTATIONS 6 CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE THROUGHOUT THE SITE PLANS. (a) Move the employee parking designation to the two spaces closest to the dumpster. COMPLETED. (b) Remove the compact car designation 1. This notation is no longer necessary - the aisle - - and parking stall dimensions now meet the minimum - code requirement. COMPLETED. (b) Revise the sign at the entrance into the sitefrom Factory Ave. to read " No Delivery Trucks use entrance on S.R. 25" instead. of "No Trucks." COMPLETED. FOR SIGN LOCATION REFER TO SP-1. FOR SIGN DETAIL REFER TO SP-2. (c) Revision of the landscape % cover due to the change. with the parking space being eliminated and replaced with landscaping. REVISED. REFER TO SP-1 CHARTS. (d) The sanitary system approved by the Health Department will require excavation and removal of existing natural vegetation. Applicant should detail on the Landscape plan how. it will be replanted (type, size and location of plants) and how the grease trap will be serviced. AREA OF NATURAL VEGITATZON THAT IS AFFECTED BY NEW SANITARY WORK SHALL BE LANDSCAPED FOLLOWING NEW TANK INSTALLATION. REASONABLE CARE IS TO BE TAKEN IN REMOVING EXISTING TREES 6 SHRUBS WITH THE INTENTION OF SALVAGING AND RE-TRANSPLANTING OF SAME. WHERE THE NATURAL VEGITATION IS DISTURBED AND NEEDS TO BE FILLED IN WE ARE PROPOSING THE PLANTING OF. 7' HZGH ARBORVITAE. REFER TO SP-2. THE PROPOSED GREASE TRAP IS TO BE SERVICED ANNUALLY. SERVICING SHALL BE DONE ON OFF PEAK HOURS DURING WHICH TIME THE FACTORY AVE. ENTRANCE/ EXIT WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE TO MOTORISTS. THE SERVICING TRUCK SHALL PERFORM HIS DUTIES FROM THE SITE, NOT FROM FACTORY AVE. THE SERVICING OF GREASE TRAPS IS A FAIRLY QUICK PROCESS, SO IT WILL BE A MINIMAL DISTURBANCE TO THE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION. (e) Note on the plan "Save enough existing vegetation and add more evergreens along the fence to screen t he back of the building" - NOTED ON THE PLANS. - Eugene G. Kempey, R, E. 640 Sunrise Highway W. Babylon, New York 11704 T. 631-321-7777 F 631-661-0486 (f) Submit a letter from NYS DOT stating they have no objections to site plan approval being granted now. - PENDING MARK WOLFGANG'S REVIEW. REFER TO TRAFFIC ENGINEERS FOR STATUS (DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES). Sincerely, .gam pFngSn1 `'N Eugene G. emp 0 WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, December 6, 2010 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Applications: Project name: Fields at Mattituck Subdivision SCTM# 1000 113-2-1.2 Location: The open space area of the property is located on Bergen Avenue, Mattituck. The residential lots are located off Stanley Road. Description: This 27-lot subdivision was approved in 2006 and contains 23 acres o open space protected by a Planning Board covenant. Status: Final Approval Standard Subdivision _ Action: Review proposal for improvements to the open space area. Attachments: Staff Report, Proposal, C&R, Stipulation of Sett lement - (in PB mail) Project name: Macari Vineyards - As Built SCTM# 1000-121-1-1.3 Location: 150 Bergen Avenue, at the intersection of Bergen Avenue and Sound Avenue, on the north side of Sound Avenue, in Mattituck Description: This site plan is for additions & alterations to an existing winery on a 5.6 acre parcel in the A-C Zone located. Status: Approved Site Plan Action: Review the As Built Plan Attachments: Draft Letter SCTM# i 1000 140-2 20 Project name: T .K. Alpha, LLC Shopping Ctr. 11 Location: 535 Pike Street, on the north side of Pike street, approximately 100 feet east of Love Lane, in the Hamlet Business Zoning District, Mattituck Description: This site plan is for the proposed construction of a 2,573 s.f. mix-use building consisting of 3 units on the first floor for retail use, 2 at 554 s.f. each and another at 1,200 s.f. and 2 residential apartments on the second floor, 554 s.f. each. In addition, there is an existing 605 s.f. building proposed as a retail use on an 11,561 s.f. parcel located in Mattituck. Status: New Site Plan Action: Review site plan submission. Attachments: Staff Report Project name: Seven Eleven Mattituck SCTM# T 1000-142-1-27 . Location: We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,985 s.f. gas station/convenience store to a 2,670 s.f. convenience store (constructing a 685 s.f. addition) on a 24,829 s.f. parcel in the B Zone located on the n/e corner of Factory', Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. - Status: New Site Plan Action: Review revised site plan. Attachments: Staff Report Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:07 PM To: Pat Moore (E-mail) Subject: 7-11 revisions As a follow up to last nights Planning Board work session, below are the map changes that were discussed. Please make the following changes to the site plan and resubmit 7 copies directly to the Planning Department for review as soon as possible. Please contact me with any questions you may have. q Parking spaces closest to Factory Ave entrance - options q Facts: Parking required: 27 @ 1/per 100sf (2,670sf) Parking proposed: 26 (including 1 ADA compliant, 1 land banked stall) (a) Remove one parking space closest to the entrance and land bank the parking space of Factory Ave to improve circulation safety (leaving 25 parking spaces) 1. Replace with landscaping and potentially widening the entrance more for safety 3. Land banking the parking space to be removed 4. The above requires a revision of the parking table and % landscape cover & landscape plan q Notations on plan - corrections/changes (a) Move the employee parking designation to the two spaces closest to the dumpster. (b) Remove the compact car designation 1. This notation is no longer necessary - the aisle and parking stall dimensions now meet the minimum code requirement. (c) Revise the sign at the entrance into the site from Factory Ave. to read " No Delivery Trucks use entrance on S.R. 25' instead of "No Trucks." (d) Revision of the landscape % cover due to the change with the parking space being eliminated and replaced with landscaping. (e) The sanitary system approved by the Health Department will require excavation and removal of existing natural vegetation. Applicant should detail on the Landscape plan how it will be replanted (type, size and location of plants) and how the grease trap will be serviced. (f) Note on the plan "Save enough existing vegetation and add more evergreens along the fence to screen t he back of the building" (g) Submit a letter from NYS DOT stating they have no objections to site plan approval being granted now. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York t Dunn Engineering AssociateW.C. w' J-4 Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street / - Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 LL2 631-288-2480 631-288-2544 Fax December 1, 2010 Ms. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Re: Proposed Convenience Market N/E/C NYS Rte 25 at Factory Avenue Mattituck, New York Dear Ms. Winser: As requested by Ms. Patricia Moore, Esq., the attorney for the applicant of the above project, enclosed for your file is one (1) set of our recent submittal to NYSDOT in this regard. If you have any questions, or need any further information, please contact me. I can be reached at the above telephone number or by email at vcorrado@dunn-pc.com. Sincerely, i i Vincent A. Corrado, P.E. Associate Engineer VC:as L2010236 P28104 Dunn Engineering Associates, RC. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 631-288-2480 631-288-2544 Fax November 30, 2010 i Mr. Shaik A. Saad, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety State of New York Department of Transportation State Office Building 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Mark Wolfgang Proposed 7-11 N/E Corner Rt. 25 @ Factory Ave. Mattituck, New York NYSDOT Case No. 01-099P SCTM No. 1000-142-01-27 Dear Mr. Saad: This is in response to your letter of June 23, 2010, in which you provided review comments on the revised Roadway Improvement Plans submitted in connection with the above project. The plans show the improvement of the radius on the northeast comer of NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue, and the traffic signal work required to accommodate this radius improvement. As indicated in the your letter of March 25, 2009 to DSC Construction Corp., the applicant will be responsible for the radius improvement, and the traffic signal and utility work will be handled by NYSDOT under a State contract. The property dedication required to implement this improvement is also indicated on the plans. Enclosed are eight (8) sets of the revised plans. Please note that this response letter and revised plans refer only to those comments made on the plans submitted by DEA. Comments regarding site plan issues have been addressed by the site engineer, and their response is also included. For ease of review, we have repeated the comments from your letter here, followed by our response to each. Comment #1: In order to progress the property donation at the subject site, please contact Mr. Bruce Branigan of our Real Estate Group at (631) 952-6092 for further direction in this matter. Mr. Shaik A. Saad, P.E. November 30, 2010 Page 2 Response #1: The applicant is awaiting site plan approval from the Town of Southold. When all such approvals have been obtained, the applicant will proceed with the dedication. Comment #2: Since some of the response comments are responded to with the reply "see site plans", the site plans should be included. Driveway design shall comply with our Driveway Policy Manual. Response #2: See site plan submittal by Kempey Engineering. Comment #3: The pedestrian Hand/Man indicator is to be a dual (side-by-side symbols) type indicator head, not two separate indicators. Response #3: The pedestrian indicators have been corrected. Comment #4: The pedestrian movement in the sequence table's phasing diagram should be on the right of the left turning movement. Response #4: The pedestrian movement has been shown as requested. Comment #5: Due to northeast comer curb relocation, Pedestrian Signal Indications with Countdown Timers are recommended to cross Factory Avenue. These pedestrian indications should function with westbound Phase 6 approach. Response #5: The revised plans now show pedestrian indications to cross Factory Avenue. The sequence table indicates they will function with Phase 6. Comment #6: The westbound left turn loop detectors, not shown on the submitted plans, will need to be replaced due to the curb relocation on the northeast corner. Response #6: This signal was originally constructed with a westbound to southbound left turn phase, which was removed by NYSDOT under Traffic Signal Requirements Contract #D258355, dated January 2001. The loops serve no function, and replacement is not necessary. Comment #7: The responses provided do not appear to be complete. Comments #3, #15, #17, #18, #20, #21 of our letter dated 12-8-09 were not addressed. The response dated 3/31/2010 states that the "site engineer" will address these points. We have not received that information. Please provide. Response #7: See site plan submittal by Kempey Engineering. Comment #8: Comments #20 & #21 are revised as follows: Mr. Shaik A. Saad, P.E. November 30, 2010 Page 3 NYSDOT's Environmental Initiative requires the planting of street trees for long- term environmental enhancement of our highway corridors. The ROW across the property frontage is sufficient to accommodate a total of five (5) street trees. Locate four (4) street trees west of the driveway. Locate one (1) tree east of the driveway. Trees are to be placed behind the new sidewalk, and approximately mid-way between the edge of sidewalk and the ROW line. We suggest planting DED resistant heritage elms, e.g. Ulmus americana `Valley Forge', 'Princeton' or 'New Harmony'. Trees shall be a minimum 2%" caliper in size, spaced approximately 30'-35' on center. Provide planting schedule with common and botanical name, and caliper size. Refer to NYSDOT Standard Sheet 611-01, Landscape Planting Details and provide details "General Tree Planting" and "Staking Trees When Specified." Response #8: See site plan submittal by Kempey Engineering. Comment #9: Please refer to the marked-up plans sheets for additional comments and corrections. Response #9: All other comments and corrections have been addressed. Please review this submittal, and provide us with your comments. If you have any questions, or need any further information, please call me at (631) 288-2480 ext 1128, or email me at vcorrado dune-pc.com. As discussed, please notify us upon your determination that all major issues have been resolved and the applicant can apply for work permits, so that we can inform the town that the applicant is ready to proceed, and to begin the dedication process. Thank you &GELCORRADO, d assistance in this matter. Sincerely V C NT P.E. Associate Engineer VC:as L2010235 P28104 cc: George Abi Zeid, President, GAZ Realty Patricia C. Moore, Esq. Kristy Winser, Town of Southold Eugerk G. Kemp, P. Ee 640 Sunrise Highway W. Babylon, New York 11704 T. 631-321-7777 F. 631-661-0486 July 28, 2010 Mr. Shaik A. Saad, PE Civil Engineer III Traff ic Engineering and Safety p [OiG State of New York Department of Transportation State Office Building 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Resubmission of Proposed Site Plan for 7-Eleven Project 9945 Main Road, NY 25 Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 Case No. 01-099P Site Engineering related comments from your 6/23/10 letter to Dunn Engineering Asso., PC (DEA) are: 7. The responses provided do not appear to be complete. Comments #3, #15, #17, #18, #21, #21 of our letter dated 12-8-09 were not addressed. The response dated 3/31/10 states that the "site engineer" will address these points. We have not received that information. Please provide. From NYSDOT letter dated 12-8-09 as mentioned above: • #3. Site plan sheets show a crosswalk going across Route 25 exit/entrance. Please verify if this is to be striped out. If so, please designate by item number. Two (2) parallel lines instead of ladder type should be sufficient. <Sheet SP-I NYSDOT has been revised to indicate (2) 6" wide parallel white lines, spaced 6'-0" apart in conformance with MUTCD standards> • #15. We recommend removing the entire existing sidewalk and reconstructing to current DOT standards. Sidewalk shall be 5' wide and placed behind a minimum 36" wide turf utility strip. <Sheet SP-1 NYSDOT has been revised to indicate new 5'-0" wide concrete sidewalk behind a 36" wide turf utility strip alone Rt 25, including the corner radius Concrete sidewalk details have been provided on sheet SP-5 NYSDOT> • #17. Why are the crosswalks hatched? <Sheet SP-1 NYSDOT has been revised to indicate crosswalks Per current NYSDOT travel lane standards Hatching has been removed> • #18. Reconstructing the entrance is going to require work in front of the neighboring property. We also suggest reconstructing the sidewalk here to create continuous compliance. If the ramp at the Eugelle G. KemPey, P. E. 640 Sunrise Highway W. Babylon, New York 11704 T. 631-321-7777 F. 631-661-0486 entrance to the shopping center is to remain, add notes indicating that any new construction shall meet flush & level. <Sheet SP-1 NYSDOT has been revised to indicate new 5'-0" wide concrete sidewalk behind a 36" wide turf utility strip along this area in question, east of the Rt 25 entrancelexit Concrete sidewalk details have been provided on sheet SP-5 NYSDOT The existing ramp at the entrance to the adjacent shopping center shall remain therefore a note has been added to the site plan indicating that the new sidewalk shall meet the existing ramp flush & level • #20 & #21. (Not applicable Superceeded by comment #8 of 6123110 letter as typed below). 8. Comments #20 & #21 are revised as follows: NYSDOT Environmental initiative requires the planting of street trees for long term environmental enhancement of our highway corridors. The ROW across the property frontage is sufficient to accommodate a total of (5) street trees. Locate (4) street trees west of the driveway. Locate (1) tree east of the driveway. Trees are to be placed behind the new sidewalk, and approximately mid-way between the edge of sidewalk and the ROW line. We suggest planting DED resistant heritage elms, e.g. Ulmus Americana `Valley Forge, `Princeton', or `New Harmony'. Trees shall be a minimum 2 1/z" caliper in size, spaced approximately 30'-35' on center. Provide planting schedule with common and botanical name, and caliper size. Refer to NYSDOT standard sheet 611-01, Landscape Planting Details and provide details "General Tree Planting" and "Staking Trees When Specified." <Sheet SP-5 NYSDOT has been revised to indicate (4) Ulmus Americana "Valley Forge west of the dr-ivewav and (1) Ulmus Americana "Valley Forge" east of the driveway. All trees mentioned above have been placed North of the new sidewalk approximately mid- way between the edge of the sidewalk and the ROW line as requested All trees mentioned above shall be 2 1/z" caliper in size spaced 30'-0" o c Planting schedule has been updated and includes common & botanical names caliper size & quantities Planting details also provided on same sheet> Sincerely, Eugene G. Kempey, P. E. Eugene G. Kempey,* LETTER OF TRANSATAL 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon N.Y 11704 Town of Southold DATE: 11/12/10 Planning Board Office JOB NAME: Mattituck 7-11 Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY We are sending you x Attached _ Under separate cover via Fed Ex _ Shop Drawings _ Prints x Plans _ Samples _ Specifications - Copy of letter -Change Order _ Other Copies Date No. Description SP-1, SP-2, SP-3, SP-4, SP-6, A-1, A-2, PH-1 8 11/12/10 Revised drawings per Planning Bd. Comments dated 8/06/10 & coordinated with current Traffic study & associated NYS DOT design b Dunn Engineering Associates. 8 11/12/10 FORMAL WRITTEN RESPONSES These are transmitted as checked below X For Approval -Approved as submitted Resubmit _ copies for approval _ For your use - Approved as noted _ Submit _ copies for approval _ As requested - Returned for corrections _ retum__ copies for approval - FOR BIDS DUE CC: File, P. Moore, GAZ, DEA 0'i 1 5 2010 Signed: DIEGO STEISEL Eugene G. Kempey, P. E. 640 Sunrise Highway W. Babylon, New York 11704T. 631-321-7777F.631-661-0486 November 12, 2010 Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Seven Eleven Store 9945 Main Road, NY 25 Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 Site Engineering related comments from your 8/06/10 letter to Mrs: Patricia Moore, Esq. are: • # 3. Provide illustrations of the proposed signage to prevent trucks from entering from Factory Avenue to make deliveries. <Sheet SP-1 has been revised to indicate the locations of (2) "No Truck" signs at the ingress to the site from Factory Avenue. These sins are in conformance with MUTCD standards as well as the,. Standard Highway Signs & Markings manual. The sign is detailed on sheet SP-2, detail 2.> • #4. (Based on Response 11) The encroachment of trucks onto the curbs can create an unsafe condition for interior site circulation and pedestrians. In addition, the entrance into the site from Factory Avenue when approaching from the south (RT. 25) has what appears to be a "non-standard radius" and it appears that not only trucks, but also vehicles pulling trailers as well as larger cars, might not be able to make that turn into the site without either swinging wide and entering the on-coming traffic lane, or running over the curb. The applicant states in his response (#11) that a "slight modification to the site plan might be possible" to improve the situation. The planning board is requiring that the applicant demonstrate on the site plan what those changes are and how they improve the encroachment and thus improve the safety of the interior site circulation as well as the entrance into the site from Factory Avenue when traveling North. Eugene G. Kernpey, P. E'. 640 Sunrise Highway W. Babylon, New York 11704 T. 631-321-7777 F. 631-661-0486 <The site plan (SR]) has been revised per the above suggestions. The turning radius in question (ineress from Factory Ave) has been changed from a,3'-6" radius to a 9'-2" radius which will greatly facilitate a motorist from turning into the site. Thecurb along side the ingress driving isle has also been revised thus iev lding a wider driving isle. The total ingress & egress isles have been widened mom 25-0 ° to 28'-3" at it's most restrictive location All of this has been accomplished while still maintaining the minimum landscaping area requirement of 35%.> Sincerely, 0 Y r? G. Eug e 'SSIONP- PATRICIA C. MOORE j~ Attorney at Law U 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsy Perkins Secretaries November 11, 2010 Southold Town Planning Board Martin Sidor, Chairman and Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ~i 2 %010 By Fax and mail Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Sidon. In response to your previous request, enclosed please find the November 8, 2010 letter from Ken Barnes, Real Estate Manager of 7-Eleven, Inc. which addresses deliveries between "peak hours" and enforcement of same. The revised final site plan will be delivered under separate cover. The final site plan being delivered will include the recommendations and requirements requested by the NYSDOT, the Planning Board comments dated August 6, 2010, and the recommendations and comments incorporated in the Traffic Study prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Also included are the site engineering response to your August 6, 2010 letter to Patricia C. Moore prepared by Eugene G. Kempey, P.E. ery truly rs, atricia C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. Eugene G. Kempey, P.E. r ~ • 7-ELEVEN, INC November 8, 2010 Martin H. Sidor, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Sidor: In reference to the proposed 7-Eleven location at 9945 Main Road in Mattituck, this letter will confirm that deliveries will not be accepted at the Mattituck 7-Eleven between the hours of 7:00 am and 9:00 am and between the hours of 4:00 pm and 6:00 pm. From our experience, the above hours are generally the "peak" hours. Please be assured that we control our vendors and enforce the delivery schedule by not accepting deliveries that violate our schedule. Sincerely, Ken Barnes Real Estate Manager Cc: George Abi Zeid Jessica Zanaca, AKRF Anthony Russo, AKRF KEN BARNES - REAL ESTATE MANAGER 690 Ellington Rd., South Windsor, Ct. 06074 TELEPHONE 860-291-6910 - FAX 860-291-6900 11;11/2010 12:21 FAX 6S1 765 4643 NOOK 1AW OFFICES Tanning Board 4~001 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attornev at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 1 1952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsy Perkins ~ November 11, 2010 Secretaries Southold Town Planning Board C: ,J Martin Sidon, Chairman and Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 By Fax and mail Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SC I'M# 1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Sidon. In response to your previous request, enclosed please find the November 9, 20response to your previous request, enclosed please find the November 9, 2010letter from Ken Barnes, Real Estate Manager of 7-Eleven, Inc. which addresses deliveries between "peak hours" and enforcement of same. The revised final site plan will be delivered under separate cover. The final site plan being delivered will include the recommendations and requirements requested by the NYSDOT, the Planning Board comments dated August 6, 2010, and the recommendations and comments incorporated in the Traffic Study prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Also included are the site engineering response to your August 6, 2010 letter to Patricia C. Moore prepared by Eugene G. Kempey, P.E. try truly rs, atricia C. Moore cc: (lama Properties-Deer Park Inc. Eugene G. Kempey, P.E. 11/11/2010 12:22 FAX 631 765 4643 MOORE LAW OFFICES lanninx Board Z002 0 41 y • 7-ELEVEN, INC November 8, 2010 Martin H. Sidor, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Sidor: In reference to the proposed 7-Eleven location at 9945 Main Road in Mattituck, this letter will confirm that deliveries will not be accepted at the Mattituck 7-Eleven between the hours of 7:00 am and 9:00 am and between the hours of 4:00 pm and 6:00 pm. From our experience, the above hours are generally the "peak" hours. Please be assured that we control our vendors and enforce the delivery schedule by not accepting deliveries that violate our schedule. Sincerely, ill of-ZG(A Ken Barnes Real Estate Manager Cc: George Abi Zeid Jessica Zanaca, AKRF Anthony Russo, AKRF KEN BARNES RFAI. FSI AI E MANAGER 690 Ellington Rd., South Windsor, Ct 06074 'FELEPHON1X60.291-6910-FAX 860-291,6900 Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 4:07 PM To: Pat Moore (E-mail) Cc: Lanza, Heather; Bill Cremers (E-mail); Don Wilcenski; Joseph Townsend (E-mail); Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail); Pappy (E-mail) Subject: 7-11 Pat, I wanted to touch base with you regarding the revised TIS and response letter to the Planning Department prepared by Dunn submitted in connection with the above project. As per the letter submitted, Dunn stated a revised site plan would be submitted under a separate cover in accordance with the response letter and amended TIS? Will you be providing this amended site plan so staff and Planning Board can review the materials submitted in conjunction with the amended site plan? Also, although a letter was submitted on July 12, 2010 outlining the measures 7-11 will take to enforce no deliveries from Factory Avenue, there has been no submission as referenced in your response letter, providing a delivery schedule that states deliveries will take place outside of peak hours? Further it was noted that the amended site plan will provide illustrations of the proposed signage for this. Will the above mentioned items be submitted under separate cover? Please advise accordingly so we may continue the review of this application. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy.W inser(a)town.southold.nv.us 1 Y~ Dunn Engineering AssociateP.c.,- Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street ~V Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 631-288-2480 631.288-2544 Fax September 21, 2010 Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board PO Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed 7-11 N/E Corner Rt. 25 @ Factory Ave. 2010 Mattituck, New York NYSDOT Case No. 01-099P SCTM No. 1000-142-01-27 Honorable Mr. Chairman and Members of the Board: Enclosed are eight (8) copies of the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, PC (DEA) in February 2010 and submitted in connection with the above project. The TIS has been revised in response to the Planning Department's letter of August 6, 2010, in which you provided the Department's remaining concerns regarding the potential traffic impacts of the proposed project. In addition, the revised report reflects several comments from the Town's May 24, 2010 letter, where appropriate. Copies of the Town's letters and our prior response are also attached to this letter. The following sections provide our response to the comments contained in your August 6, 2010 letter. For ease of review, we have repeated the comments from their letter here, followed by our response to each. Comment 1: The Southold Town Planning Board has the ultimate responsibility to respond to concerns from the public raised at the public hearing and to make the decision on this application, thus the NYSDOT's involvement does not exempt the applicant from providing a report that is fully supported. To that end, the Response 2 on Page 2 (and the 7-11 Traffic Study) fails to mention that the average pass-by credit of 61 percent is only for the PM peak hour as stated in ITE. The use of the 61 percent pass-by credit for the AM and Saturday peak hours may not be appropriate and is unsupported in the report. The Atlantic Traffic & Design Engineers, Inc. Traffic Study utilized a lower pass-by credit in their study for Saturday compared to the weekday. Either provide support for the use of the 61 % Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman September 21, 2010 Page 2 pass-by credit for the AM and Saturday peak hours or use of pass-by credit value for those times that is supported in the report. Response 1: As discussed in the study, information presented in the ITE "Trip Generation Handbook" indicates that up to 87% of total traffic and an average of 61% of weekday P.M. peak hour traffic patronizing convenience markets is already on the roadway network for another purpose. Under a related land use, Convenience Market with Gasoline Pumps (Land Use Code 853), weekday A.M. peak hour pass-by rates as high as 72%, and an average of 63% were reported by ITE. The ITE report provides no data for either land use for any other peak hours, nor does it provide support for the use of any other lower pass-by rate. However, at the request of the Town of Southold, the trip generation rates were recalculated using an extremely conservative pass-by rate of 25%, and the capacity analyses were repeated. The results of these analyses are provided in the revised study in Table 6, which is reproduced here. Note that even utilizing this extremely conservative pass-by rate, for which no supporting documentation exists, no change in overall levels of service are predicted by the analysis. 'J urp~Frh ~y a a;3 ,4 1 a., K ~ sr3 N ~k ~ k Weekday AM C 26.6 C 30.8 C 31.8 C 33.0 Peak Hour Main Road INYS Route 25) Weekday P.M. at Peak Hour C 33.3 D 48.5 D 50.1 D 51.8 Factory Avenue Saturday Midday C 26.6 C 29.8 C 30.3 C 30.7 Peak Hour Note 1: Includes an increase in traffic volumes of 2.0% per year to account for normal background traffic growth. Note 2: Same as Note 1 and includes the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed redevelopment. Table 6 Summary of Signalized Intersection Capacity Analyses Results Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman September 21, 2010 Page 3 Comment 2: Provide the delivery schedule table as stated in your Response 6, Page 4. Response 2: The delivery schedule will be provided by the applicant under separate cover. It is our understanding that the schedule indicates that, to the extent possible, truck deliveries, trash pickup, etc, will take place outside the peak hours. Comment 3: Provide illustrations of the proposed signage to prevent trucks from entering from Factory Avenue to make deliveries. Response 3: The site plan has been revised to provide illustrations of the proposed signing. The site plan will be submitted under separate cover by the applicant. Comment 4: The encroachment trucks onto the curbs can create an unsafe condition for interior site circulation and pedestrians. hi addition, the entrance into the site from Factory Avenue when approaching from the south (Rt. 25) has what appears to be a "non-standard radius" and it appears that not only trucks, but also vehicles pulling trailers as well as larger cars, might not be able to make that turn into the site without either swinging wide and entering the on-coming traffic lane, or running over the curb. The applicant states in this response (#11) that "a slight modification to the site plan might be possible" to improve the situation. The Planning Board is requiring that the applicant demonstrate on the site plan what those changes are and how they improve the encroachment and thus improve the safety of the interior site circulation as well as the entrance onto the site from Factory Avenue when traveling north. Response 4: It is our understanding that the site plan will be revised to provide an improved radius at this location. Note that it is the intention of the applicant to limit truck use at this location. Comment 5: Queuing conditions on and near Factory Avenue remain a concern of the Planning Board, and the public, as illustrated in this excerpt from a letter submitted at the public hearing from John Condon, a licensed engineer, and the public testimony: "Cars making left turns onto Factory Avenue from the proposed 7-11 will cause problems when the cars are stacked at the red light and patrons block the northbound lane of Factory Avenue because there is not enough room to make it into the southbound lanes. In addition, this will be worse when Magic Fountain is busy." The traffic study must address these issues to provide the Planning Board and the public with assurance, supported by data, that any impacts are either non-existent, • Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman September 21, 2010 Page 4 minor or are being mitigated. From what our consultant has told us, the data is already in your report, but has not been tabulated and analyzed. Please present the data regarding queuing involving Factory Avenue in a simple table for all conditions analyzed to demonstrate any queuing issues (e.g. will driveways be blocked, etc.) and provide a conclusion regarding the impact of the proposed project. Response 5: The results of the intersection capacity analyses performed for the purposes of the report were utilized to determine the average queue expected at the southbound approach to the traffic signal. The results of this queue analysis are presented in the report in Table 8, reproduced here. The values in Table 8 represent the length of queue predicted for the various peak time periods analyzed, in feet, during a red indication for southbound Factory Avenue. Results of the queue analysis indicate that the longest average queue expected is 94 feet, which would occur during the weekday PM peak hour during a red interval on the signal. Since the distance from the proposed site driveway to the stop line on southbound Factory Avenue is slightly over 110 feet, under such conditions the queue would not extend beyond the driveway, although little storage would be available for additional vehicles wishing to join the queue. Were these conditions to occur, vehicles wishing to leave the site to travel south on Factory Avenue would need to wait in the site driveway for the queue to clear upon initiation of the green phase for the southbound approach. Since the analyses on which the queue analysis was based were conducted using extremely conservative worst case peak summer season traffic volumes, this condition is expected to rarely occur, except possibly during the busiest days of the year, when similar conditions are common. L 46 feet 54 feet 72 feet TR 82 feet 94 feet 72 feet Table 8 Queue Analysis NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman September 21, 2010 Page 5 Comment 6: Our consultant has stated that the default values used in the Dunn Engineering report do not accurately depict traffic conditions for the intersection. One example being that using the default factor value of zero for the heavy vehicle factor is not accurate and could affect the capacity analyses. For the sake of accuracy and due diligence on the part of the Planning Board, they must have a traffic report that represents the conditions as accurately as possible. Currently the report uses the "zero" default factor value to describe heavy truck traffic (meaning that the analyses were done assuming no trucks were using the roads i volved). Truck traffic is a particular concern at this intersection; photos of heavy trucks using Factory Avenue were submitted at the public hearing. To be credible and useful to the Planning Board, the traffic report must use realistic factor values (peak hour and percent heavy vehicle) in their analyses. Factors that would be more acceptable than the default values can be found in the Atlantic Traffic & Design Engineer's Traffic Study for Chase Bank (according to our consultant). Response 6: The capacity analyses have been revised to reflect those used in the Atlantic Traffic report for the Chase Bank. Little change in the results of the analyses occurred. The results are provided in the revised report. The queue analysis was based on these revised results as well. Comment 7: Our consultant has recommended that all future correspondence the applicant has with the NYSDOT regarding the Maintenance and Protection of Traffic (MPT) Plan and the re-design of the NYS Route 25/Factory Avenue intersection be copied to the Town so we are aware of the status and any issues that might arise. Response 7: Copies of all future correspondence regarding this project between the applicant, his representatives, and reviewing agencies will be provided to the Town. Note that we are in receipt of NYSDOT's final comments on the roadway improvement and traffic signal plans prepared by the applicant at no cost to the Town or State. The final design package for these improvements will be prepared and submitted to NYSDOT in anticipation of obtaining highway work permits after the site plan has been finalized. In so doing, all involved parties can be assured that all of the documentation for the project is consistent, so as to avoid additional delay in obtaining final approval and progressing the project accordingly, and in implementing the off-site roadway improvements being provided by the applicant, to address pre-existing roadway deficiencies. Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman September 21, 2010 Page 6 We trust that the forgoing information and the additional analyses provided in the enclosed report successfully addresses any of the Board's remaining concerns. If you have any questions, or need any further information, please call me at 631 288 2480 ext 1128, or email me at vcorradona,dunn-pc. Sincerely, V NC . T. ANGELO CORILADO, P.E. Associate Engineer VC:lam L2010197 P28104 Attachments cc: George Abi Zeid, President, GAZ Realty Ms Patricia Moore, Esq. Ms. Kristy Wisner, Town of Southold Planning Department TOWN OF SOUTHOLUS l Purchase Order # 21310 Tax Exempt # A163554 Date April 20, 2010 Account # B 80D 4 500 500 Deliver and send billing to: -Vendor Department PLANNING BOARD AKRF Envinronmental s Planning Cons. Address 3900 Veterans Memorial Highway Suite 300 I Bohemia, NY 11716 L VENDOR '"Return this copy and Town of Southold voucher itemized and signed for payment" ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL Consultin 'des or~fe%*i W of SR-25 a for v ttituek NOT TO EXCEED Trafft $4,200.00 ,'S JJ ^Y.,4 fgyyf' .4 r }j & f d THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE DEPT. HEAD AND THE SUPERVISOR I CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE DEPARTMENT'S CERTIFICATION OF GOODS OR SUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAILABLE SERVICES IN THE AP ROPRIATION CHARGED I certify that the goods or services were received by this Department and all exceptions duly noted. Dept. ead Planning Directotr I CERTIFY THIS TO BE A JUST Signed Title AND TRUE PURCHASE ORDER s ~ u Supervisor Date Vendor No. 'Check No. Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher 1328 Vendor Name Vendor Address Enteredby AKRF INC. %40 Park Ave. So.ud~G Vendor Telephone Number 212 696-0670, NY 100161tClerk Vendor Contact Invoice Invoice Invoice Net Purchase Or* Number Date Total Discount Amount Claimed Number Description of Goods or Services Fund aed gtiaount Number 101914 8/17/10 $716.49 $716,49 21310 Peer Review & Tech B.M20 4500-500 • Wes.. memo re 7k4E even Traffic Study SUTM#IOUU-142-1-27 cr • Payee Certification Department Certification Signature Tide Signature Company xame Date Tide Planning Director Date o i • • I AKRF INC. Environmental and Planning Consultants 440 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 (212) 696-0670 FEDERAL TAX ID NO. 13-3433475 Town of Southold Peer Review Invoice 101914 Attn: Kristy Winser Project : 60117 P.O. Box 1179 Project Name : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PEER Southold NY 11971 Invoice Group : L1 Invoice Date : 8/1712010 For Professional Services Rendered through: 7/31/2010 PO No. 21310 PM:JZ Previous Current Total Phase Code / Name Phase Fee Amount Amount % Complete Fee Earned 0100 PEER REVIEW AND TECH MEMO 4,200.00 3,483.51 716.49 100.00 4,200.00 Total Fee: 4,200.00 Total Fee Earned To Date 4,200.00 Less Previous Billings 3,483.51 Amount Due This Invoice 716.49 i V1 LL, AUG 19 2010 L' I Southold To%r planr-r MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~r4F sours P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS OQ 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND Q (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI lyr,Q Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 6, 2010 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Seven Eleven Store SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore: The following are the second round of comments from AKRF, the Traffic Engineering Consultant the Planning Board has retained to conduct the peer review of Dunn Engineering's Seven Eleven Traffic Study. There are a few items that remain to be addressed. The sooner these items are addressed, the sooner the Planning Board can proceed with their review of the site plan application. The Planning Board, upon advice from our Traffic Engineering Consultant, has decided that the following items are necessary to include in the traffic report if they are to be able to base their decision on it. If you recall, certain specific issues were raised at the public hearing that must be addressed, including queuing issues. 1. (Based on Response 2, Page 2 in the July 12, 2010 Dunn Engineering letter.) The Southold Town Planning Board has the ultimate responsibility to respond to concerns from the public raised at the public hearing and to make the decision on this application, thus the NYSDOT's involvement does not exempt the applicant from providing a report that is fully supported. To that end, the Response 2 on Page 2 (and the 7-11 Traffic Study) fails to mention that the average pass-by credit of 61 percent is only for the PM peak hour as stated in ITE. The use of the 61 percent pass-by credit for the AM and Saturday peak hours may not be appropriate and is unsupported in the report. The Atlantic Traffic & Design Engineers, Inc. Traffic Study utilized a lower pass-by credit in their study for Saturday compared to the weekday. Either provide support for the use of the 61 % pass-by credit for the AM and Saturday peak hours or use a pass-by credit value for those times that is supported in the report. ail 2. Provide the delivery schedule table as stated in your Response 6, Page 4. 3. Provide illustrations of the proposed signage to prevent trucks from entering from Factory Avenue to make deliveries. 4. (Based on Response 11.) The encroachment of trucks onto the curbs can create an unsafe condition for interior site circulation and pedestrians. In addition, the entrance into the site from Factory Avenue when approaching from the south (Rt. 25) has what appears to be a "non- standard radius" and it appears that not only trucks, but also vehicles pulling trailers as well as larger cars, might not be able to make that turn into the site without either swinging wide and entering the on-coming traffic lane, or running over the curb. The applicant states in this response (#11) that "a slight modification to the site plan might be possible" to improve the situation. The Planning Board is requiring that the applicant demonstrate on the site plan what those changes are and how they improve the encroachment and thus improve the safety of the interior site circulation as well as the entrance into the site from Factory Avenue when traveling north. 5. Queuing conditions on and near Factory Avenue remain a concern of the Planning Board, and the public, as illustrated in this excerpt from a letter submitted at the public hearing from John Condon, a licensed engineer, and the public testimony: "Cars making left turns onto Factory Avenue from the proposed 7-11 will cause problems when the cars are stacked at the red light and patrons block the northbound lane of Factory Avenue because there is not enough room to make it into the southbound lanes. In addition, this will be worse when Magic Fountain is busy." The traffic study must address these issues to provide the Planning Board and the public with assurance, supported by data, that any impacts are either non-existent, minor or are being mitigated. From what our consultant has told us, the data is already in your report, but has not been tabulated and analyzed. Please present the data regarding queuing involving Factory Avenue in a simple table for all conditions analyzed to demonstrate any queuing issues (e.g. will driveways be blocked, etc.) and provide a conclusion regarding the impact of the proposed project. 6. (Based on Comments 3 and 4 on Page 12.) Our consultant has stated that the default values used in the Dunn Engineering report do not accurately depict traffic conditions for the intersection. One example being that using the default factor value of zero for the heavy vehicle factor is not accurate and could affect the capacity analyses. For the sake of accuracy and due diligence on the part of the Planning Board, they must have a traffic report that represents the conditions as accurately as possible. Currently the report uses the "zero" default factor value to describe heavy truck traffic (meaning that the analyses were done assuming no trucks were using the roads involved). Truck traffic is a particular concern at this intersection; photos of heavy trucks using Factory Avenue were submitted at the public hearing. To be credible and 2 useful to the Planning Board, the traffic report must use realistic factor values (peak hour and percent heavy vehicle) in their analyses. Factors that would be more acceptable than the default values can be found in the Atlantic Traffic & Design Engineer's Traffic Study for Chase Bank (according to our consultant). 7. Our consultant has recommended that all future correspondence the applicant has with the NYSDOT regarding the Maintenance and Protection of Traffic (MPT) Plan and the re-design of the NYS Route 25/Factory Avenue intersection be copied to the Town so we are aware of the status and any issues that might arise. The Planning Board looks forward to receiving the information requested above so we can proceed with our review of this application. Please call the Planning Department with any questions. Very truly yours, Vh;~, Martin H. Sidor Chairman 3 Y SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE ,s DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES HUMAYUN J. CHAUDHRY, D.O., M.S. COMMISSIONER PERMIT CONDITIONS Health Services Reference # -U 1 7 Project Name / "ll ~tnvt~~7cP iYZ~Y 1//.~eti The attached plan, when duly signed by a representative of the department, in conjunction with these conditions, constitutes a permit to construct a water supply and/or a sewage disposal or collection system for the property as depicted. The applicant should take note of any conditions of approval, which may be indicated on the plan or enclosed herein. Construction must conform with applicable standards including "Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other than Single Family Residences." Omissions, inconsistencies or lack of detail on the plan do not release the applicant from the responsibility of having the construction done in conformance with applicable standards. Issuance of this permit shall in no way relieve the design professional of responsibility for the adequacy of the complete design. The permit (plan) expires three (3) years after the approval date. Any modification which may affect the proposed sewage disposal or water supply systems requires submission of a revised plan and additional fees (if applicable) for reapproval prior to construction. No inspections will be performed by the department on expired permits. Permits may be renewed, extended, transferred, or revised in accordance with the procedures described in Instructions to Renew, Extend, or Transfer an Existing Permit for Other than Single Family Residences (Form WWM-081). It is the applicant's responsibility to call the department in advance to arrange inspections of the sewage disposal and/or water supply facilities prior to backfilling. These include inspections of the sewage collection and disposal systems, water supply system components and piping, and final grading as shown on the approved plans. In certain cases, inspections of the soil excavation may be required to determine the acceptability of the soils for sewage disposal systems. The department must be notified at least 48 hours in advance to schedule an inspection by calling 852-5754; and excavation inspections must also be confirmed by calling 852-5700 prior to 9:30 a.m., the morning of the inspection. Article VII of the Suffolk County Code, "Septic Industry Businesses," requires that all installers of septic systems within Suffolk County shall possess a valid license from the Suffolk County Office of Consumer Affairs. This affice can refuse to perform inspections or grant final approval for the construction of projects that are installed by an unlicensed individual. It is, therefore, in your best interest to utilize a cesspool contractor with a valid license to avoid substantial delays in your project. Final approval issued by the Department is necessary prior to the occupancy of new buildings, additions to existing buildings, or for the use of sewage disposal or water supply systems. SEE PAGE 2 W WM-016 (Rev. 10/02/06) Page 1 of 2 CONDITIONS FOR OBTAINING FINAL APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTED PROJECT As a condition of this permit to construct, the following items must be completed as a minimum, prior to building occupancy and use of the sewage disposal system or water supply facilities. For further information concerning this, refer to Instructions For Obtaining Final Health Department Approval Of Constructed Projects For Other Than Single Family Residences (Form WWM-19). ? Excavation Inspection by the Office of Wastewater Management prior to installation of any leaching pools to determine acceptability of soils. (Call 852-5754 to schedule an inspection and confirm by calling 851-5700 prior to 9:30 a.m., the morning of the inspection.) tisfactory inspection by Office of Wastewater Management of the sewage disposal system / sewage ~Saatment system. (Call 852-5754 to schedule an inspection.) Satisfactory inspection of the water supply system by: ffice of Wastewater Management (Call 852-5754 to schedule an inspection.) ? Office of Water Resources, Water Quality Unit (Call 852-5810 for inspection.) ? Satisfactory inspection by the Office of Pollution Control (Call 854-2502 for inspection.) ? Storage tanks ? Other: application for a Food Permit to the Food Control Unit (Call 852-5873 for instructions.) our (4) prints of an As-Built plan 'Tap letter" from water district ertification from the licensed sewage disposal system install(( ( &d,--10 7c~> ? "S-9 form" from Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) ? Sewer district approval of sewer line installation (for other than SCDPW districts) ? Well drillers certificate ? Water analysis ? Certification of Sewage Disposal System Abandonment (form W WM-080) Design Professionals Certification of Constructed Works (form W WM-073, enclosed) for: Sewer lines and sewage collection system ? Retaining walls (approved as part of the sewage disposal system) ? Sewage pump station/valve chamber Sub-surface sewage disposal system ? Sewage treatment plant Water supply system ? Abandonment of Preexisting sewage disposal system and/or water supply ? Other: ? Other: V AVM-016 (Rev. 10/02/06) Page 2 of 2 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SEE VICES OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 360 YAPHANK AVENUE, SUITE 2C YAPHANK, NY 11980 (631) 852-5700 INSTRUCTIONS FOR OBTAINING FINAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTED PROJECTS FOR OTHER THAN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES It is the applicant's responsibility to call the Department to arrange inspections of the sewage disposal and/or water supply facilities prior to backfilling. These include inspections of sewage collection / disposal systems and water supply system components and piping, and final grading as shown on the approved plans. In certain cases inspections of the soil excavations for sewage disposal systems as well as other inspections, may be required. The Department must be notified at least 48 hours in advance of scheduled backfilling. Following satisfactory construction and inspection of the sewage disposal / sewage collection and water supply facilities, the following items are required for final approval: 1. Four (4) prints of an As-Built plan of the subject property, prepared by a licensed design professional or surveyor, showing the following information: a. The lot location, tax map number(s), lot area, and metes/bounds description. b. The exact location, number of stories, dimensions, and gross floor area of all building(s). C. The exact location of sewage disposal system components. Give two (2) dimensions measured from the building comers to each cover at grade. For large systems, provide measurements in a table format. d. The exact location of the private well, if applicable. Give two (2) dimensions measured from the building comer; to the well. e. The exact location of the public water service lateral line(s), if applicable. f. The exact location of sewer line(s) from all buildings to the street, if applicable. g. The exact location of sewage collection system components, if applicable. This includes sewer piping, manholes, cleanouts, and building sewers. Inverts and sizes may be required. h. For projects served with private water distribution systems, the exact location of on-site water mains, services, valves, curb boxes, hydrants, RPZ devices, and master meters must be shown. i. The exact location of storm drainage structures. 2. If a well has been installed as the potable water supply, then the applicant must submit a well water analysis completed within one year by a certified lab, and a well driller's certificate completed by a licensed well driller. If the well or water quality does not conform to standards, corrective measures will be required as described in the Department's "Private Water System Standards:" 3. If public sewers are utilized to serve the project, the applicant must also submit one (1) copy of the sewer line inspection approval from the sewer district. In districts operated by Suffolk County, one (1) original of Form S-9, duly executed by the Suffolk County Department of Public Works, and one (1) copy of a Suffolk County Department of Public Works field sketch are required. WWM-019 (08/05) PAGE 1 OF 2 4. If public water is utilized to serve the project, a tap letter from the appropriate water district indicating that service has been completed to the building(s), will be required. 5. For projects served with private water distribution systems, bacteriological analyses of water samples collected after disinfection are required at locations specified by the SCDHS. 6. If a subsurface sewage disposal system has been installed, the applicant must submit a certificate from a licensed sewage disposal installer, attesting that the system has been constructed according to the criteria of the SCDHS. Refer to Certification of Sewage Disposal System by Installer, form W WM-078. (If not licensed, the installer must contact the Suffolk County Office of Consumer Affair at (631) 853-4596.) 7. In certain cases, the applicant will be required to submit a certification from a licensed design professional, attesting that all components of the sewage disposal or sewage collection systems have been properly inspected and constructed according to the approved plans and permit conditions. Refer to Certification of Constructed Works by Design Professional, form WWM-073. 8. In certain cases, including projects involving Multiple Residential Units, the applicant will be required to submit a'Certifrcation of Carbon Monoxide Alarm Installation (form WWM-075). Refer to "Carbon Monoxide Alarm Standards" for details regarding carbon monoxide detector requirements. 9. For situations involving the abandonment of existing sewage disposal systems, the applicant must submit a Certification of Sewage Disposal System Abandonment, form WWM-080, and/or a Certification of Constructed Works by Design Professional, form WW74-073. For a list of specific items required for Final Approval of a certain project, applicants should refer to the Permit Conditions (form WWM-016) issued with their stamped approved plans at the time of Approval to Construct. THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT REFERENCE NUMBER AND TAX MAP NUMBER MUST BE ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE OR DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. PHOTOCOPIES OF DOCUMENTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WWM-019 (08/05) PAGE 2 OF 2 Suffolk County Department of Health Services Office of Wastewater Management 360 Yaphank Avenue, Suite 2C Yaphank, New York 11980 (631) 852-5700 CERTIFICATION OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM BY INSTALLER This certification shall not be used in lieu of inspections required by personnel of the Department and may be duplicated on company letterhead, provided it contains the information below. Health Department Reference Number. Suffolk Tax Map Dist: Sect(s) Blk(s) Lot(s) Project Name or Address: Subdivision Name & Lot # Applicant's Name: Date of System Installation: Description of System Installed: Septic Tank Volume (gallons) Shape: [ ] Rectangular [ ] Cylindrical Top: [ ] Slab [ I Traffic Slab (J Dome Name of Precast Manufacturer: Leaching Pools Number of Pools Diameter and Effective Depth Top: [ ] Slab [ ] Traffic Slab [ ] Dome Name of Precast Manufacturer: Other: Sketch below the measurements from building corners to the access covers of disposal system, or attach a separate sketch prepared by installer. I hereby certify that the subsurface sewage disposal system, described herein, has been installed by me in accordance with the approved plans and standards of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services; and is operational. Installer's Signature: Date Installer's Name: Company Name: Phone Company Address: Consumer Affairs Liquid Waste License Number: WWM-078 (08/05) Suffolk County Department of Health Services Office of Wastewater Management 360 Yaphank Avenue, Suite 2C Yaphank, New York 11980 (631) 852-5700 CERTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTED WORKS BY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL Health Department Re ference Number: Suffolk Tax Map # : Dist: Sect(s) Blk(s) Lot(s) Project Name: Applicant's Name: ITEMS BEING CERTIFIED (Check all that apply) [ ) Sewer Lines and Sewage Collection System Components [ ] Retaining Walls (approved as part of the sewage disposal system) [ ] Sewage Pump Station / Valve Chamber [ j Subsurface Sewage Disposal System [ ] Sewage Treatment Plant [ ] Water Supply System [ ] Abandonment of Preexisting Sewage Disposal System and /or Water Supply [ ] Other As the Licensed Professional Engineer or Architect 1, or qualified personnel under my direct supervision, have inspected the work specified above in accordance with the New York State Education Law, and (check one) [ ] I hereby certify that all material and work conforms to approved plans and permit conditions, and with guidelines issued pursuant to the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. (Attach any inspection ortest reports required by the Department.) [ ] 1 hereby certify that all material and work conforms to approved plans and permit conditions, and with guidelines issued pursuant to the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, except as described in my attached addendum. (Also attach any inspection or test reports required by the Department.) Engineer's/ Architect's signature: Print Name - Date: License Number: Affix seal - - This certification shall not be used in lieu of inspections required by personnel of the Department. WWM-073 (08/05) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 360 YAPHANK AVENUE, SUITE 2C ATTENTION: DATE: YAPHANK, NEW YORK 11980 Gene Kempey,P.E. Auugust 2,2010 (631)852-5700 REFERENCE NUMBER: CIO-09-0007 TO: Eugene Kempey,P.E. PROJECTNAME: 7-11 Mattituck Convenience 640 Sunrise Highway Store West Babylon, NY 11704 RE: Approval to Construct Permit Issuance GENTLEMEN: We are sending you attached: U.S. Mail COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 8/2/10 1 Approved to Construct Site Plans 1 2 Permit,WWM016 1 3 Installers Certification,WWM078 1 4 Design Professional Certification,W WM073 1 5 Instructions for Obtaining Approval,WWM019 ?These are sent per your request. ® Comments: These are approved for construction & Cooordinate with SCDHS Food Unit. COPY TO: DSC Associates, Inc. SIGNED: 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 L". Z~~~ Chuck Chocklir If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Vendor No. Check No. Town of Southold,. New York - Payment Voucher 1328 Vendor Name Vendor Address Entered by AKRF Inc. 440 Park Ave.$o. Audit Date Vendor Telephone Number NY, NY 10016 Town Clerk Vendor Contact Invoice Invoice Invoice Net Purchase Order Number Date Total Discount Amount Claim Number Descd tion of Goods or Services Gonend - UdWFund and Account Number onsu ng svices. o .LuE 101722 7.21.10 $90.15 90.15 21310 /30/10t Peer Review B,4,020 4 500 500 -Eleven Mattituck raffic Study ummoo-142-1-27 Payee Certification Department Certification Signature Tide signature Company Name Date TitleNQv v to K9;;1 _ Date 1'Zfo - t 0 WA" INC. Environmental and Planning Consultants 440 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 (212) 696-0670 FEDERAL TAX ID NO. 13-3433475 Town of Southold Peer Review Invoice # : 101722 Attn: Kristy Winser Project : 60117 P.O. Box 1179 Project Name : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PEER REVIEW Southold NY 11971 Invoice Group: L1 Invoice Date : 7/21/2010 For Professional Services Rendered through: 6130/2010 PO No. 21310 PM: JZ Previous Current Total Phase Code / Name Phase Fee Amount Amount % Complete Fee Earned 0100 PEER REVIEW AND TECH MEMO 4,200.00 3,393.36 90.15 82.94 3,483.51 Total Fee: 4,200.00 Total Fee Earned To Date 3,483.51 Less Previous Billings 3,393.36 Amount Due This Invoice 90.15 23 ~ 6 REM REM 7-ELEVEN, INC. ~~cc 115 Broadhollow Road, Suke 300, Melville, New York 11747 V I A 0 Fs aJeY fl,l f~h~ (631) 421-7644 phone (631) 5476374 fax July 12, 2010 J Planning Board of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 2010 54375 Route 25 ,UL PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairperson Dear Mr. Sidor: In reference to the town's inquiry on how we will enforce no deliveries from Factory Ave. at the proposed store at 9945 Main Rd in Mattituck, I offer the following: • Prior to store opening we will issue formal letters to all our vendors requiring all deliveries be from Main Rd. only. • Once we have drivers set up from each vendor, we will have them sign a personal °declaration" that they will only make deliveries from Main Rd. • We will have our managers and employees refuse deliveries should a vendor attempt to make the deliver from Factory Ave. • At the town's request we could put a small "no deliveries" sign at the Factory Ave. curb cut. Please let me know if these actions are agreeable to the town. We will do everything possible to ensure these rule are followed. Sincerely, zllvq J -40'r--- Andrew Shelhorse 7-Eleven Real Estate Cc: George Abi Zeid Jessica Zanca, AKRF Anthony Russo, AKRF ZD Dunn Engineering Associes, P.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street 1~. Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 r1^/ 631-288-2480 631-288-2544 Fax July 12, 2010 Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board PO Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 5 TOZ Proposed 7-11 N/E Corner Rt. 25 @ Factory Ave. Mattituck, New York NYSDOT Case No. 01-099P SCTM No. 1000-142-01-27 Honorable Mr. Chairman and Members of the Board: This is in response to the Planning Department's letter of May 24, 2010, in which the results of the review by Allee King Rosen and Fleming (AKRF) of the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, PC (DEA) in February 2010 and submitted in connection with the above project were provided to us. The TIS was prepared in accordance with the scope provided to us by your office, supplemented where appropriate to meet industry standards, and addressed all issues identified in the scope. As you will note from a review of the responses, many of AKRF's comments appear to be generated by an incomplete review of all of the material supplied in the Traffic Impact Study including the Appendices, in that much of the material requested was already in the document. Furthermore, a number of the remaining comments could have been readily resolved through a review of the traffic study prepared by Atlantic Traffic for the Chase Bank application, from which much of the data used in our study was obtained, as directed by the Town. Since our study was prepared in February 2010, and AKRF's letter is dated in late May 2010, there was ample time to request this document from our office or from the Town, whichever may have been considered appropriate. This is especially concerning to us since we had several conversations with AKRF during their review, and they never requested the Chase report from us. Had they done so, we would have been glad to provide the report, or any other information they might have considered necessary to facilitate and expedite their review. Note that through our agreement with NYSDOT, the applicant is providing significant off-site roadway improvements, as well as a property dedication to accommodate the improvements, • Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 2 which will largely mitigate a pre-existing non-standard turning radius on the northeast comer of NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue. NYSDOT is responsible for the review and approval of the design of this improvement being prepared by DEA, and has largely completed their review. The detailed design package was submitted to your office as well. NYSDOT is not reviewing this TIS, having already agreed that the benefit to the traveling public provided by the applicant through the off-site roadway improvements will offset any potential impact the project may have. In light of the fact that the project is expected to add only one new vehicle to the roadway network every two to four minutes during the peak hours, (considerably fewer, in most cases, than either of the land uses considered in the Atlantic Traffic study), its traffic impact is likely to be undetectable, except at the intersection immediately adjacent to the site, and this intersection will be considerably improved by the applicant through the above described roadway and signal improvement project. The following sections provide our response to the comments contained in AKRF's letter. Additional information is attached where appropriate to the response. For ease of review, we have repeated the comments from their letter here, followed by our response to each. GENERAL COMMENTS: Comment 1: Provide figures in the TIS that show the Existing, No Build, Build increment, and Build volumes for all peak hours and intersections analyzed to complement the traffic distribution and assignment figures. Response 1: The information requested was already provided in the Appendix of the TIS in spreadsheet format. The scope provided by the Town contained no mention of preferences regarding format of materials or information presented in the report. Thus, the material was presented in DEA's preferred format, consistent with industry standards and in keeping with the format of numerous prior reports presented to the Town of Southold by DEA on behalf of our clients. It is noted that the format of the materials presented has no bearing on the ability to assess the project's potential traffic impact. Comment 2: A 61 percent pass-by credit is very high. In other regions of NYSDOT, 25 percent is the maximum pass-by credit utilized in a TIS. Provide documentation from NYSDOT Region 10 that shows that they approve the use of this pass-by trip generation credit. Response 2: As previously stated, NYSDOT is not reviewing this TIS, having already agreed that the benefit to the traveling public provided by the applicant through the off- site roadway improvements will offset any potential impact. As stated in the TIS, information provided in the ITE Trip Generation report indicates that as much as • Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 3 87% of total traffic visiting convenience markets is already on the network for another purpose. Thus, in keeping with DEA's practice for studies of this kind, an extremely conservative estimate of the project's potential traffic impact is presented in the TIS, in which pass-by credits nearly 30% lower than those documented at other convenience markets were utilized. Comment 3: Provide a copy of the TIS for the No Build projects in the Appendix of the TIS. Also provide the pass-by credits that were utilized in the No Build projects. Response 3: As per the scope provided by the Town, the TIS utilized information from the Traffic Study for the Chase Bank prepared by Atlantic Traffic for the no-build projects. By inference, it is assumed that the Town considered the data provided in this study to be accurate and acceptable. A copy of the material provided to us by the Town is attached. Pass by trips are discussed on Pages 6 and 7, which indicate that 40% pass-by was used on weekdays and 25% on Saturday for the Chase Bank. The Atlantic study provided no definitive information on the Hudson City development; therefore, ITE Trip Generation data was utilized. Comment 4: Provide a copy of all data (volume, signal timing/phasing, pass-by credit, peak hour) obtained and utilized in TIS from NYSDOT. Response 4: The reviewer is directed to the NYSDOT traffic volume information already provided in the Appendix of the TIS. No other NYSDOT information was utilized in the TIS. Comment 5: Utilize Synchro (now required by NYSDOT) for the analysis of the traffic network. As per scope requirements, provide queue data for Existing, No Build, and Build conditions. Response 5: As previously stated, NYSDOT is not reviewing this TIS, having already agreed that the benefit to the traveling public provided by the applicant through the off- site roadway improvements will offset any potential impact. The HCS Software is based on the methodology presented in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual, and is nationally accepted by agencies for analyses of this kind. We note also that analyses conducted for the Atlantic Traffic study utilized HCS, seemingly a double standard. SYNCHRO is more appropriate to conditions wherein a number of interconnected traffic signals are to be analyzed. Finally, as per the attached NYSDOT-issued Engineering Bulletin EB07-012, HCS software is a department approved traffic analysis software program. No additional capacity analyses will be conducted. Comment 6: Provide a Delivery Schedule Table for the week by time of day and truck type. Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 4 Response 6: This information will be provided by the applicant. Comment 7: Provide an explanation of how it will be enforced that trucks will only utilize the Main Road driveway to enter and exit the site? Response 7: Information provided by the applicant indicates that vendors will be informed of this policy, prior to the store opening. Each driver will be required to provide a signed "declaration" that they will only make deliveries from the Main Rd entrance. Appropriate signing will be provided on site to reinforce the policy. Comment 8: Is the applicant designing a new traffic signal for the Factory Avenue and Main Road intersection? What new features or technology will the signal have, if any? Response 8: Design of the traffic signal is being provided at no cost to the State or the Town by the applicant as part of the agreed-upon offsite roadway improvements. The applicant will bear the cost of the design and construction of the roadway improvements, and the design of the traffic signal and NYSDOT will bear the cost of the traffic signal improvements. The reviewer is directed to the copy of the detailed design of the entire improvement plan that was provided in the Appendix of the TIS and referenced in the report. The traffic signal design provides all equipment required by NYSDOT at the time they were prepared. The plans are being revised to include pedestrian signals across Factory Avenue, which were requested by NYSDOT in their letter of June 23, 2010, and are being added to the design prior to submittal and application for highway work permits. The traffic signal installation and the roadway and radius improvements projects will be coordinated to minimize the inconvenience to the traveling public. Comment 9: Provide information in the TIS regarding utility and sidewalk changes associated with the roadway improvements planned at the northeast comer of Factory Avenue and Main Road. Response 9: The reviewer is directed to the copy of the detailed design, provided in the appendix of the TIS, referenced above. Comment 10: Provide a discussion of construction traffic impacts in the TIS. Response 10: The scope provided by the town made no mention of construction impacts. Note that this is an extremely small project, consisting of the addition of 885 SF of building space, and associated site improvements and will generate very low volumes of construction vehicle traffic. With respect to the offsite roadway improvements, a Maintenance and Protection of Traffic (MPT) plan was developed as part of the design of the roadway improvements utilizing NYSDOT • 0 Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 5 Standard Sheets and information from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This MPT plan, which is under review by NYSDOT, will provide appropriate protection for the traveling public during construction of this significant improvement to a pre-existing non-standard feature on the State highway. The reviewer is directed to the plans provided in the Appendix of the TIS for reference. Comment 11: The statement in the TIS that W13-50 tractor trailer trucks would have more difficulty negotiating the site is unclear and not acceptable. Provide further clarification of this statement based on AKRF's comments presented in Figure 1. Response 11: As stated in the TIS, the truck turning templates utilized in the analyses have been found to be very conservative. While it is not anticipated that the slight wheel path encroachments on curbs predicted by the analyses will occur with any regularity, it is for precisely this eventuality that the curb surrounding the channelizing island in the proposed site driveway is shown as mountable curb. Mountable curb is provided in these situations so that the islands can be sized to maximize the channelizing effect notwithstanding an occasional wheel hit. While the potential encroachment on the internal curb is not relevant to the project's impact on the roadway network, it is so slight as to be extremely unlikely to occur. However, a slight modification to the site plan might be possible. Comment 12: The TIS states that WB-50 tractor trailer trucks could at times block several parking spaces in the lot while unloading. Would there be sufficient parking to accommodate demand at this time? Would it impede on-site circulation during normal and emergency conditions? Response 12: As stated in the TIS on page 40, the ITE Parking Generation report indicates peak demand for 16 spaces, including employees, based on conservative assumptions as discussed later in this document, and 26 spaces are to be provided. Thus, if it is assumed that a WB-50 truck would block 5 spaces, as shown on page 42, 21 spaces would still be available, which would be sufficient to accommodate demand during peak hours, and, by extension, off-peak demand, when truck deliveries are recommended As shown in Figure 14 in the TIS, a tractor trailer parked at the loading area would not impede circulation, beyond the previously discussed 5 parking spaces, because the loading area is located away from the main parking area. Comment 13: Provide a more thorough discussion and analysis of sight distance calculations for peak conditions. For example, when the Magic Fountain Ice Cream store and Shopping Center are operating at peak conditions and cars/trucks are parked on • • Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 6 Factory Avenue and Main Road, do they present a sight distance issue for the proposed 7-Eleven site? Response 13: Some infrequent parking on Factory Avenue in the vicinity of the existing site driveway onto Factory Avenue and also in the vicinity of the proposed driveway has been noted. Patrons of the ice cream store are parking on the street due to the fact that the store does not appear to have sufficient on-site parking to accommodate demand, and trucks servicing the shopping center appear to park on Factory Avenue as a matter of convenience to the drivers. It should be noted that patrons of the ice cream store have been observed parking on the applicant's property as well. As stated in the TIS, more than sufficient sight distance will be available for vehicles entering and leaving the proposed driveway location on Factory Avenue. Sight distance to the south is available to the signal, and sight distance to the north is available for well over 250 feet, the minimum stopping sight distance recommended for a 35mph design speed. It must be noted that the site plan for the proposed project provides more than enough parking on-site to accommodate projected demand so that patrons visiting the proposed convenience store will never have to park on the surrounding roadways, which would contribute to this pre-existing condition of concern. Parking activity generated by the surrounding land uses, the ice cream store and the shopping center, was discussed at length in the TIS beginning on page 45. The TIS noted that this activity is an ongoing condition regardless of whether or not the proposed project goes forward, and is outside the control of the applicant. While the accident analysis conducted for the TIS indicates that only a single accident took place that could possibly be attributed to this behavior during the entire three year period examined, if in fact vehicles visiting the two adjoining land uses are considered to be creating a hazardous condition, it is incumbent upon the Town to take appropriate measures to address the situation as it exists now. The TIS made a number of suggestions as to how these conditions could be addressed. An additional suggestion might be that the Town imposes more stringent parking, stopping or standing restrictions, accompanied by increased enforcement activity, at these locations. Note that as discussed in numerous instances in the TIS, the proposed project will result in the closure of one driveway on Main Road, and the relocation of the driveway on Factory Avenue, currently located directly opposite the ice cream store's driveway, to a point as far from the intersection as possible, which will reduce the potential for conflicts at this location. Thus, to the extent possible, the applicant is addressing this pre-existing condition. Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 7 Comment 14: Provide an analysis and summary of the accident experience (most recent 3 years) within the study area in the TIS (records and information should be obtained from the state and local police). Response 14: This work was completed and the results have already been documented in the TIS. As stated in the TIS, accident records for the most recent three year period available were obtained from NYSDOT and summarized in the TIS beginning on page 13. A copy of the accident information is provided in the Appendix of the TIS. As previously discussed and as stated in the TIS in several instances, the applicant will provide a property dedication, design services and construction costs for a major improvement to the curb radius on the northeast corner of the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue, the intersection that will likely be the only location where a perceptible traffic impact will occur, however slight. In addition, one of the two existing driveways on Main Road serving the site will be closed, and the remaining driveway as well as the single driveway on Factory Avenue will be relocated as far away from the intersection and from the parking and de-parking activity at the nonconforming driveways to the Magic Fountain as the site design will allow. Furthermore, the driveway on Main Road will accommodate right turns into and out of the site only. In this manner, combined with the low volumes of new traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed redevelopment of the site, no detrimental impact on the rate of accident occurrence in the vicinity of the site is anticipated. hi fact, as stated in the TIS, the improved geometry could result in a decrease as the rate of accident occurrence at this location. TIS SECTION SPECIFIC COMMENTS SITE TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS Comment 1: On Table 2, "Site-Generated Traffic", the AM peak hour Entry and Exit volumes both are presented as `98'. Calculations based on the formulas presented in the ITE Trip Generation manual yield `96' and `99' as the AM peak hour Entry and Exit volumes, respectively. Please clarify. Also provide the trip generation rates used in these calculations. Response 1: The following average trip generation rates, based on peak hour of the generator values, were utilized: • Weekday AM Peak - 73.10 trips per 1000 SF x 2.67 kSF = 195.177 trips (say 196) • Weekday PM Peak - 53.42 trips per 1000 SF x 2.67 kSF = 142.631 trips (say 143) • Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 8 • Saturday Peak - 77.11 trips per 1000 SF x 2.67 kSF = 205.884 trips (say 206) Thus, based on the AM peak hour directional distribution of 49% entering to 51% exiting trips, the correct estimate are 96 entering trips and 100 exiting trips. Given the inexact nature of these calculations, the fact that the total number of trips is unchanged, and that the trips are distributed among several turning movements at the site driveways, this inconsistency is considered minor and in no way prevents the formation of an opinion as to the project's potential traffic impact or lack thereof. OTHER PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS Comment 1: Table 4, "Site-Generated Traffic Other Planned Developments" please provide the ITE Land Use names and numbers used in the calculation of the Chase Bank (AM peak only) and the Hudson City Savings Plaza trip generation numbers. Please also provide the trip generation rates used in the calculation of these numbers. Response 1: The Atlantic Traffic study utilized Land Use Code 912, Drive in Bank, for the Chase Bank. However, no information was provided for the weekday AM peak hour. Therefore, in our analysis, we utilized the same Land Use Code for the weekday AM peak hour. The average rate of 12.35 trips per 1000SF of GFA was utilized, thus 12.35 trips / 1000SF GFA x 4.2 kSF GFA = 51.87 trips (say 52). Note that we did not apply any pass-by reduction to this number. For the Hudson City Savings Bank, our study utilized Land Use Code 710 General Office Building for the office component, and Drive in Bank for the bank component. For the weekday AM peak hour for the office component, the regression equation of Ln(T) = 0.80 Ln(X) + 1.55 trips was utilized, where T is the total number of trips and X is the size of the facility in 1000SF of GFA. Thus, Ln(T) = 0.80Ln(9.982) + 1.55, or 29.68 trips, (say 30). Due to an anomaly in the data or the regression equation process, perhaps because of the small size of the development as compared to those contained in the data set, the same regression equation was used for the weekday PM peak hour, which is reasonable since the average rate and range of rates presented in the ITE report for each hour are within a few percent of one another. For the Saturday peak hour, the regression equation of Ln(T) = 0.81Ln(X) - 0.12 was utilized, all variables as previously defined. This resulted in a total of 5 trips for the office component. • • Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 9 For the Drive in Bank component, average rates for each peak hour were utilized, resulting in 40 trips during the weekday AM, 84 trips during the weekday PM, and 86 trips during the Saturday midday. Thus, totals of 70, 114, and 91 trips for the weekday AM, PM and Saturday peak hours respectively were estimated to be generated by the Hudson City Savings Plaza development, as shown in Table 4 on page 20 of the TIS. DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS Comment 1: Figure 4 - The total percentage of trips exiting the site is 102%. Please verify and correct so that the total is 100%. Response 1: This minor typographical or rounding error is corrected on the revised figure attached. Comment 2: Figure 7 - The total percentage of trips entering the site is 92%. Please verify and correct so that the total is 100%. Response 2: This minor typographical or rounding error is corrected on the revised figure attached. Comment 3: Figure 8 - The total percentage of trips exiting the site is 92%. Please verify and correct so that the total is 100%. Response 3: This minor typographical or rounding error is corrected on the revised figure attached. Comment 4: Figures 4 through 9 - Please show the directional distribution percentage in the eastbound direction along Main Road at its intersection with the site driveway. Response 4: This minor typographical or rounding error is corrected on the revised figure attached. TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ANALYSIS Comment 1: Please provide a table to accompany Figures 10, 11, and 12 that explicitly show the Primary Trip totals, the Pass-By Trip Totals, and the Total Number of trips (both Entering and Exiting). The trip generation tables in the other sections of the TIS do not clearly identify the trip numbers presented in Figures 10, 11, and 12. Please revise the TIS to utilize consistent terminology in identifying and referencing Primary Trips and Pass-By trips. Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 10 Response 1: The information requested is contained in the Appendix of the TIS in spreadsheet format. The scope provided by the Town contained no mention as to preferences regarding format of materials or information presented in the report. Thus, the material was presented in DEA's preferred format, consistent with many prior reports presented to the Town of Southold. The format of the materials presented has no bearing on the ability to assess the project's potential traffic impact. Comment 2: Figure 10 shows the pass-by trips incorporated into the total volumes at the driveways. Pass-by trips are normally not accounted for in calculating the trip volumes at driveways. Please verify and correct accordingly. Response 2: While it is correct that the total number of trips (primary and pass-by) is shown at the driveways, it is incorrect to say that pass-by trips should not be accounted for in calculating trip volumes at site driveways. The pass-by phenomenon is defined by its characteristic of attracting traffic from the passing stream, thus resulting in an increase in turning movements, which has an impact on intersection operations. It is DEA's standard practice to show the pass-by trips when evaluating potential land uses that attract a significant portion of traffic from the passing stream. The reviewer is directed to the spreadsheets provided in the appendix of the TIS if clarification is needed. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Comment 1: Table 6 - Please present the Level of Service (LOS) and Delay values for lane groups in addition to the overall intersection LOS and Delay values. Response 1: This information can be found on the printouts of the results of the intersection capacity analyses, provided in the Appendix of the TIS. Comment 2: Please add a table that shows the LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections, similar to Table 5. Response 2: See attached. Comment 3: The TIS states that typically, traffic impact studies do not consider intersections unless traffic volumes due to a proposed action result in increases of 5% or more. Please provide an explanation and evidence for the basis of this statement. Response 3: Explanation and / or evidence for this statement is irrelevant, since no intersections were excluded from analysis on this basis. Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 11 PARKING Comment 1: The TIS states that one parking space per 100 square feet of convenience store space must be provided as per the Town of Southold code. The TIS states that based on this criteria, 23 spaces are required. The project space is listed as 2,670 square feet in the TIS. One parking space per 100 square feet would yield a requirement of 27 spaces, not 23 spaces as stated in the TIS. Since 26 spaces are to be provided on the project site, the requirement of 27 spaces, as per the Town code, would not be met. Response 1: The TIS states that "Calculations provided on the current site plan indicate that 23 spaces are required and 26 are provided." The site plan has been reviewed, and it indicates that the parking calculations are based on 2,275 square feet of "convenience store gross retail area, counter space & storage area." Regardless of what is presented on the site plan, the extremely conservative calculations provided in the TIS indicate that 16 spaces are sufficient to accommodate demand. Comment 2: Please mention which Edition of the ITE "Parking Generation" manual was used to compute the parking demand for a convenience market. Please also mention the parking demand rate used to calculate this demand. Response 2: The parking demand calculation was based on information provided in the 3`a edition of the Parking Generation report, under Land Use Code 851, Convenience Market (Open 24 Hours). Because of the lack of consistency in the data presented in the report, in keeping with DEA's policy of presenting conservative, worst case estimates for studies of this kind, the absolute highest demand value, 5.3 spaces per 1000 SF of GFA, resulting in 5.3 spaces / 1000SF GFA x 2.67 kGFA = 15.486 spaces required (say 16), was utilized. Thus the TIS utilized the most conservative information available. CONCLUSIONS Comment 1: Page 51, Item 5 - Item 5 states that "During the weekday AM peak hour, 28 new vehicles will be added to the roadway network, 15 during the weekday PM peak hour and 20 during the Saturday midday peak". According to Table 3, these numbers represent the number of trips entering the site only, not the total number of trips entering and exiting the site. Please correct this statement. Response 1: Each new vehicle represents two trips, one entering trip, and one exiting trip. The conclusion is correct as presented. • Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 12 Comment 2: Please ensure that any corrections made as per this memorandum are updated accordingly in the Conclusions section. Response 2: No other corrections are required to the conclusions. HCS FILES Comment 1: Main Road at Factory/Sigsbee, Existing AM - Analysis year is shown as 2010. Please correct to 2009. Response 1: This typographical error has no bearing on the results of the analysis or the reviewer's ability to provide an assessment of the project's potential traffic impact, or lack thereof. Comment 2: Main Road at Factory/Sigsbee, 2012 Build AM - The southbound through volume is shown as `8'. This traffic volume data tables shows a value of `9' for this movement. Please verify and correct accordingly. Response 2: This typographical error has no bearing on the results of the analysis or the reviewer's ability to provide an assessment of the project's potential traffic impact, or lack thereof. Comment 3: The Peak Hour Factory (PHF) values are set to the default values (0.90 for signalized intersections and 1.00 for unsignalized intersections). Please verify and correct accordingly. Response 3: No raw count data was provided for use in the study, therefore default values were utilized. Use of default values is considered reasonable due to the fact that extremely conservative assumptions were made in estimating additional site traffic. Note that use of other than default values were they available would be applicable across all analysis scenarios, and would therefore have little effect on the incremental impact due to site generated traffic. Comment 4: The Percent Heavy Vehicle (PHF) values are set to the default value of 0%. Please verify and correct accordingly. Response 4: No raw count data was provided for use in the study, therefore default values were utilized. Use of default values is considered reasonable due to the fact that extremely conservative assumptions were made in estimating additional site traffic. Note that use of other than default values were they available would be applicable across all analysis scenarios, and would therefore have little effect on the incremental impact due to site generated traffic. Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 13 AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR WB-50 TRACTOR TRAILER TRUCKS (These comments are depicted visually in Figure 1) Comment 1: The entry movement from Main Road is riding on the curb of the raised island. Response 1: See response to Comment 11 in General Comments, above. Comment 2: The back-in movement to the loading dock area seems to ride on the southeast corner of the curb in front of the building (near the eastern most parking space in front of the building). Response 2: See response to Comment 11 in General Comments, above. Comment 3: The exit movement onto Main Road does not work as it is riding on both curbs and also encroaches on the left turn lane on Main Road. Response 3: See response to Comment 11 in General Comments, above, and note that it is common for large vehicles to encroach on adjoining lanes when executing turning movements. It is for this reason that truck deliveries are encouraged during off peak hours. AKRF Figures 2 and 3 AKRF Figures 2 and 3 make reference to analyses conducted by others, and were not submitted as part of out professional transportation engineering analyses. As previously stated, the applicant is providing several significant improvements to the prevailing conditions, specifically a) closure of one driveway on Main Road, b) relocating the remaining driveways to be as far from the intersection as possible, and equally as importantly, as far from the potential conflict with traffic due to the pre-existing non-conforming use at the ice cream store across Factory Avenue, c) restriction of turning movements on Main Road to right turns in and out of the site only, d) improvement of the pre-existing non-standard radius on the northeast corner of Main Road at Factory Avenue, including construction costs and a property dedication to accommodate the improvement, and e) provision the design of the traffic signal improvements at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue, including pedestrian buttons and signals to cross Factory Avenue. It is our opinion that these roadway improvements will provide significant benefit to the motoring public, and that the applicant's willingness to provide them at no cost to the Town or the State represents a good faith effort to offset the minimal impact that the proposed redevelopment may have. While it is our opinion that the TIS provided more than sufficient information to allow a reasonable assessment of the proposed project's potential impact on traffic conditions on the Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman July 12, 2010 Page 14 adjacent roadway network, we trust that the additional information provided herein will allow the Town to do so at this time. If you have any questions, or ne y further information, please call me at 631 288 2480 ext 1128, or email me at vcorrad unn- .corn. SiX,,l DO, P.E. V CORRA Associate Engineer VC:as L2010138RevB P28104 Attachments cc: Jessica Zanca, Technical Director, AKRF Anthony Russo, Vice President, AKRF 3900 Veterans Memorial Highway Suite 300 Bohemia, New York George Abi Zeid, President, GAZ Realty Ms Patricia Moore, Esq. Ms. Kristy Wisner, Town of Southold Planning Department ~~xcEl~~oe, m STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI , P.E. STANLEY GEE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ACTING COMMISSIONER June 23, 2010 Mr. Vincent Angelo Corrado, P.E. Associate Engineer Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. 60 Main Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Your March 31, 2010 Submission Proposed 7-11 Convenience Store 9945 Main Road ? 5 2010 NY 25, Mattituck ,SCTM 1000-14200-0100-027000 _ Our Case No. 01-099P Dear Mr. Corrado: This is in regard to the information for the referenced project which was submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site work and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. In order to progress the property donation at the subject site, please contact Mr. Bruce Branigan of our Real Estate Group at (631) 952-6092 for further direction in this matter. 2. Since some of the response comments are responded to with the reply "see site plans", the site plans should be included. Driveway design shall comply with our Driveway Policy Manual. 3. The pedestrian Hand/Man indicator is to be a dual (side-by-side symbols) type indicator head, not two separate indicators. 4. The pedestrian movement in the sequence table's phasing diagram should be on the right of the left turning movement. • Mr.'Vincent Angelo Corrado June 23, 2010 Page 2 of 2 5. Due to northeast corner curb relocation, Pedestrian Signal Indications with Countdown Timers are recommended to cross Factory Avenue. These pedestrian indications should function with westbound phase 6 approach. 6. The westbound left turn loop detectors, not shown on the submitted plans, will need to be replaced due to the curb relocation on the northeast corner. 7. The responses provided do not appear to be complete. Comments #3, #15, #17, #18, #20, #21 of our letter dated 12-8-09 were not addressed. The response dated 3/31/2010 states that the "site engineer" will address these points. We have not received that information. Please provide. 8. Comments #20 & #21 are revised as follows: NYSDOT's Environmental Initiative requires the planting of street trees for long-term environmental enhancement of our highway corridors. The ROW across the property frontage is sufficient to accommodate a total of five (5) street trees. Locate four (4) street trees west of the driveway. Locate one (1) tree east of the driveway. Trees are to be placed behind the new sidewalk, and approximately mid-way between the edge of sidewalk and the ROW line. We suggest planting DED resistant heritage elms, e.g. Ulmus americana `Valley Forge', `Princeton' or `New Harmony'. Trees shall be a minimum 21/2" caliper in size, spaced approximately 30'-35' on center. Provide planting schedule with common and botanical name, and caliper size. Refer to NYSDOT Standard Sheet 611-01, Landscape Planting Details and provide details "General Tree Planting" and "Staking Trees When Specified." 9. Please refer to the marked-up plans sheets for comments and corrections. Please submit eight (8) copies of revised plans for our review. In your response letter, please state how the above comments are addressed, item by item. Mr. Mark Wolfgang is coordinating review of the subject material. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject Case Number and County Tax Map number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By Shaik A. Saad SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold r. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:ajf Vendor No. t heck No. Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher 1328 Vendor Name Vendor Address ed by AKRF, Inc. 440 Park Ave. So. Audit Bate . Vendor Telephone Number 212 696-0670 NY, NY 10016 Town Clerk Vendor Contact i, Invoice Invoice Invoice Net Purchase Order Number Date Total Discount Amount Claim Number Description of Goods or Services . - and Account Nub ' 101350 6/15/10 $1,883.31 $1,883.3 21310 consulting svices. ltru AZf2 4 WI4 SOP 0 5/31/10: Peer revi 7-Eleven Mat stuck raffic Study Payee Certification Department Certification I Signature Title Signature Company Name Date Title 0) di ti.,,_~R.,. r.}y~ Date 2] 0 kq WJAJ(u INC. Environmental and Planning Consultants 440 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 (212) 696-0670 FEDERAL TAX ID NO. 13-3433475 Town of Southold Peer Review Invoice # : 101350 Attn: Kristy Winser Project: 60117 P.O. Box 1179 Project Name : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PEER REVIEIA Southold NY 11971 Invoice Group : L1 Invoice Date : 6/15/2010 For Professional Services Rendered through: 513112010 PO No. 21310 Previous Current Total Phase Code / Name Phase Fee Amount Amount % Complete Fee Earned 0100 PEER REVIEW AND TECH MEMO 4,200.00 1,510.05 1,883.31 80.79 3,393.36 Total Fee: 4,200.00 Total Fee Earned To Date 3,393.36 Less Previous Billings 1,510.05 Amount Due This Invoice 1,883.31 i ~~~`1JUN 2 ~ X10 Southold ZoW n MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS r3F SOpr~o P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR hQ Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~p 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWN END COU (cor. Main Solid. d, NY oungs Ave.) Telephone: 631 765-1938 May 28, 2010 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia C Moore Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Gama Deer Park (Seven Eleven), Mattituck SCTM# 142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore; The Planning Board is in receipt of the technical memorandum on the Traffic Impact Study for the above referenced site plan application. AKRF our technical consultant has provided comments for your review and it is attached for your information and response. For your convenience, AKRF is available at anytime to further discuss their comments with your engineering consultant. Their contact information is provided on the memorandum. As always, you can contact the Planning office anytime with questions you may have. Very truly yours, / Kristy Winser Senior Planner cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director aEnvironmental and Planning Consultants 3900 Veterans Memorial Highway Suite 300 Bohemia, NY 11716 tel: 631 285-6980 fax: 631 285-6919 www.akrf.com May 24, 2010 Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: 7-Eleven Convenience Store Traffic Impact Study - Mattituck, NY Dear Ms. Winser: After reviewing the 7-Eleven Convenience Store Traffic Impact Study (TIS) dated February 2010, AKRF has the following comments and/or requests for information: GENERAL COMMENTS • Provide figures in the TIS that show the Existing, No Build, Build increment, and Build volumes for all peak hours and intersections analyzed to complement the traffic distribution and assignment figures. • A 61 percent pass-by credit is very high. In other regions of NYSDOT, 25 percent is the maximum pass-by credit utilized in a TIS. Provide documentation from NYSDOT Region 10 that shows that they approve the use of this pass-by trip generation credit. • Provide a copy of the TIS for the No Build projects in the Appendix of the TIS. Also provide the pass-by credits that were utilized in the No Build projects. • Provide a copy of all data (volume, signal timing/phasing, pass-by credit, peak hour) obtained and utilized in TIS from NYSDOT. • Utilize Synchro (now required by NYSDOT) for the analysis of the traffic network. As per scope requirements, provide queue data for Existing, No Build, and Build conditions. • Provide a Delivery Schedule Table for the week by time of day and truck type. • Provide an explanation of how it will be enforced that trucks will only utilize the Main Road driveway to enter and exit the site? • Is the applicant designing the new traffic signal for the Factory Avenue and Main Road intersection? What new features or technology will the signal have, if any? • Provide information in the TIS regarding utility and sidewalk changes associated with the roadway improvements planned at the northeast comer of Factory Avenue and Main Road. AKRF, Inc. 9 New York City 9 Hudson Valley Region • Long Island • Baltimore / Washington Area 9 New Jersey • Connecticut Kristy Winser 2 May 24, 2010 • Provide a discussion of construction traffic impacts in the TIS. • The statement in the TIS that WB-50 tractor trailer trucks would have more difficulty negotiating the site is unclear and not acceptable. Provide further clarification of this statement based on AKRF's comments presented in Figure 1. • The TIS states that WB-50 tractor trailer trucks could at times block several parking spaces in the lot while unloading. Would there be sufficient parking to accommodate demand at this time? Would it impede on-site circulation during normal and emergency conditions? • Provide a more thorough discussion and analysis of sight distance calculations for peak conditions. For example, when the Magic Fountain Ice Cream store and Shopping Center are operating at peak conditions and cars/trucks are parked on Factory Avenue and Main Road, do they present a sight distance issue for the proposed 7-Eleven site? • Provide an analysis and summary of the accident experience (most recent 3 years) within the study area in the TIS (records and information should be obtained from the state and local police). TIS SECTION SPECIFIC COMMENTS SITE TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS • On Table 2, "Site-Generated Traffic", the AM peak hour Entry and Exit volumes both are presented as `98'. Calculations based on the formulas presented in the ITE Trip Generation manual yield `96' and '99' as the AM peak hour Entry and Exit volumes, respectively. Please clarify. Also provide the trip generation rates used in these calculations. OTHER PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS • Table 4, "Site-Generated Traffic Other Planned Developments" please provide the ITE Land Use names and numbers used in the calculation of the Chase Bank (AM peak only) and the Hudson City Savings Plaza trip generation numbers. Please also provide the trip generation rates used in the calculation of these numbers. DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS • Figure 4 - The total percentage of trips exiting the site is 102%. Please verify and correct so that the total is 100%. • Figure 7 - The total percentage of trips entering the site is 92%. Please verify and correct so that the total is 100%. • Figure 8 - The total percentage of trips exiting the site is 92%. Please verify and correct so that the total is 100%. • Figures 4 through 9 - Please show the directional distribution percentage in the eastbound direction along Main Road at its intersection with the site driveway. TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ANALYSIS • Please provide a table to accompany Figures 10, 11, and 12 that explicitly show the Primary Trip totals, the Pass-By Trip totals, and the Total Number of trips (both Entering and Exiting). The trip generation tables in the other sections of the TIS do not clearly identify the trip numbers presented in Figures 10, 11, and 12. Please revise the TIS to utilize consistent terminology in identifying and referencing Primary Trips and Pass-By trips. • Figure 10 shows the pass-by trips incorporated into the total volumes at the driveways. Pass-by trips are normally not accounted for in calculating the trip volumes at driveways. Please verify and correct accordingly. Kristy Winser 3 May 24, 2010 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS • Table 6 - Please present the Level of Service (LOS) and Delay values for lane groups in addition to the overall intersection LOS and Delay values. • Please add a table that shows the LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections, similar to Table 5. • The TIS states that typically, traffic impact studies do not consider intersections unless traffic volumes due to a proposed action result in increases of 5% or more. Please provide an explanation and evidence for the basis of this statement. PARKING • The TIS states that one parking space per 100 square feet of convenience store space must be provided as per the Town of Southold code. The TIS states that based on this criteria, 23 spaces arc required. The project space is listed as 2,670 square feet in the TIS. One parking space per 100 square feet would yield a requirement of 27 spaces, not 23 spaces as stated in the TIS. Since 26 spaces are to be provided on the project site, the requirement of 27 spaces, as per the Town code, would not be met. • Please mention which Edition of the ITE "Parking Generation" manual was used to compute the parking demand for a convenience market. Please also mention the parking demand rate used to calculate this demand. CONCLUSIONS • Page 51, Item 5 - Item 5 states that "During the weekday AM peak hour, 28 new vehicles will be added to the roadway network, 15 during the weekday PM peak hour and 20 during the Saturday midday peak". According to Table 3, these numbers represent the number of trips entering the site only, not the total number of trips entering and exiting the site. Please correct this statement. • Please ensure that any corrections made as per this memorandum are updated accordingly in the Conclusions section. HCS FILES • Main Road at Factory/Sigsbee Existing AM - Analysis year is shown as 2010. Please correct to 2009. • Main Road at Factory/Sigsbee, 2012 Build AM - The southbound through volume is shown as W. The traffic volume data table shows a value of `9' for this movement. Please verify and correct accordingly. • The Peak Hour Factor (PHF) values are set to the default values (0.90 for signalized intersections and 1.00 for unsignalized intersections). Please verify and correct accordingly. • The Percent Heavy Vehicle (PHF) values are set to the default value of 0%. Please verify and correct accordingly. AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR WB-50 TRACTOR TRAILER TRUCKS (These comments are depicted visually in Figure 1) • The entry movement from Main Road is riding on the curb of the raised island. • The back-in movement to the loading dock area seems to ride on the southeast comer of the curb in front of the building (near the eastern most parking space in front of the building). • The exit movement onto Main Road does not work as it is riding on both curbs and also encroaches on the left turn lane on Main Road. Figures 2 and 3 also attached have comments regarding circulation. Kristy Winser 4 May 24, 2010 Until these comments are addressed, the impact of the proposed project cannot be fully assessed and evaluated. If you have any questions on the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact us at our direct extensions - (631) 574-3723 (Jessica) or (914) 922-2359 Sincerely, J/~y ~~r~ CJ-029W', OL'' 19 RU W.O'"'_-'_- Jessica Zanca, AICP Anthony P. Russo Technical Director Vice President r 71+L' tlcC([.-;n n-.O'+fmf^1 ')•n -~''r,Q .a marl .i dock c-en Gppe, 4 rT r de aN_ 4t So~.~-fit a~T corr2r' ~ - - t of rye (1,'-' 11 1x ~ , c Yry a A ` W f. w 4 ~c + • ~ a V L) DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C. - y: ~ Caunlunt Ea PSteu Waepyylen BalcR M119T8 - {Wtl'as~tl~ 7-11 7t+E ex:r n,o"e»,.:,,= u•-=.~ MATTITUCK ;H~.~ Road -joes ~0{ work ~r`1b0 entry mno~eV•``i•, rG_}~ OS it 'i{ rl~ine} IIn'C44%. C"lw T/:)tom 1:iq"' Rp°c1 iS VV 14 and t"' OAC~4 iy f+;e )#f4 f r~ I ndr..q oY t e u^'L, TRACTOR TRAILER In Rood or ~e ra'>ed TRUCK TURNING PATH PATE SCALE DEA NO. 02/17/10 1"= 50' 28104.00 IEMPEY ENGINEERIP 2 ~tV 2 rv VI SUNRISE HIGHWAY WEST BABYLON. N,? Y 11 11]09 P: 31.321.7786 F: 631.661.0486 / o_ I of o g.`~ • ) 48RUNSWICK DRIVE".. C EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 is T o P. 631.368.3324 h0 8Y 6. t 7 F. 831.388.1524 U 13 4C hn 4 PROP. ELNA L ')-ELEVEN' S M ~sT GrfiFl TYPICAL TRUCKDETAII. REN9roea: SEE DETAIL p SCALE: 1"=20-0" l iu ~~V- ors 0•~~WM~ zsse - FNa•bURK~eM~Sww a u"rv u.r v19N9 ,4pq®bA,1(Rr P[LLIj rca m. t ,09N9 NN rnd~xc cue cv m x f - ...~'u.~ cnumnaSMli9)HIZe, +r. .SAn .xo 002x. .n W„e. ~so vSll4 :OSS WALE K56 W2 K.5 (31 B 5.6e N 18'57'30- E o/~ )cm.to• 2D J)104-15.. P r•5~ I98TOF ORAN41G3: ' no2..ffis, • 111~'~t~~~~ ' k I " E~ i ?G, 1` I. BM•1 0 Vim" i - • ti95, • O C SP•1 srrePS.AN rwx ~ sa. 2 I - ' PAP~.G WLIRA'01(3fl-. _ CORNER RADIUS U J~v otA1NA08c nw SCALP: 1'=10'-0" ,4,= Cam. ' ...o SP-2 LANOSCAeePwN 0 f I - 1 ggW,wVflyl"I,3AND9CAPE sao-nuce k7 i ? A]OSitvVO EHO,hR Tray if, T; SP-3 dRYlYTAQ 4 ~ q $P4 TRU[0[•OfRE!lAN 4: D81'AD Q' r'/ ~533t SP-5 tItSICK110UtEMN4'.M" U ~ _e A-I RiOR'1HA1.m 9Dlllfl E58vwTIC A-2 6A9T ANOME6fHL6VATpN3 4 e~ 4Li i i I ~ n • i°ii ] •f• ' _ 8'5)'3 W ...may 98.00 r.n.ee+ ( ~I i MAIN --ROAD (SS. z51 P GAW OffR PARK OVyWEk MAIN ROAD I ~C1 F az9mosTSroxD StMO _ o-+ ~.n aSn eBaaRwSrF,Src y o all I PROJECT: 7~ I"IIKI _ f MNM R0. d FwCTORY QO 'p, [y AVE181E rm. ^ = WTDfUOK NY a na AvL un am om eexiw x s".r .cxcw a xxx xm sm Fa / y .bacon maw2 cnrtLx sbseLL v,. xa .waac we v FIO K UNTY TAX MO v ti • j 0600 SEC. BLK. LO 1000 142 1 0'. 27 1 TRUCK OUTS PLAN Q~ o•c m.2s.m eoRSN Ra AE NOSED s i ~ ~ Sa.R"M M.CI !v,'C J III KEMPE r' 2 a` fit'/ aq 690 SUNRISE HIGHWAY k Q eCP"` WEST BABYLON. NY 11704 £C5 u k P: 631.321.7777 ~F: 831.881.0966 8d^' A 3 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE X " P EAST FAST N HPO NY 11731 6.1] P. 631.X3.=4 V J78° :~01Ij i +!Pe ~Ct-~'I 1 1 F. 837.366.1524 lAQ k 'A PROP. ELEVATED -ELEVEN° SGN RIMSONS: SEE D AI / TYPICAL CK DETAIL 8 C~ TRU ~s.cn ~~SCALE: I"=20'-0" ~ I oewlo6c9 U(i1T k t JJ 0.00010®NNIQ6F0.0NT! 1 s~ 5 iy'~ 6 uY MYBW Y sMYPF RMf0. f 7MM W.1NR10 ~ Cv5M CuA CN 0.O X ° Eutl NSCw sC VUa v./r CO0.BWIEOAt85l/IIN C R 0 S 5 ° Y°Nw 36.wn~ % sn wrt "a s / w. .o..., i~/ U..1 Ass' ~ BC 35.85% I _ % J / N 40'5)'30° E S/:.cK usraF auNtNas: •1~" - ms~ I Oab49YR _ °tR I m7EeuN - - eA7u,w6 cACnRAtwta 4. DfiT rt. OP CORNER nn I.c ` _ ~ ~AAAceWC'UC~'L~S " rm" r nco. .L NfIIF3 ~ J SCALB: I" =10A• ~yy. 7ANSlf}ANALY86 i SP-2 i.GAea ei.ASeJiPnrns - urmscteENmPS y °s 7oROw _ - A SP-3 ~ srrecetAa [SP-4 TRIICKROM]MAN&M fyF°jyyq ,C h0 $P-$ jlAl&:K ROMEPLWI iFEf 0 A-1 NOB]HANDaoulHeL£vA / 4, S° f f.-fi: A-2 eA~-ANOwurs.evwna rr A'S w ~ "~~98.00 .J _ MAIN ROAD (s. > Y p-Jw i OWNER GAIAk.0EER PARR ~i MAIN ROAD INC. .+.u M PROSt PONDRMO Nom."." ao ezaGKVIUeNr 0 f h { PROJECT: MUMEKING. p. R. f NNNNO.BFKTORY s.%i¢ ly AVEM)! W~ x svn CNS w~NNC xm rm ne = NArRTSCK NY n°Nm~~ vw"an anR. ~an:o: ..o .wrc wa^\ F K NTY TAX DIST. SEC. BLK. - / = 1000 I92 01 I TRUC ROUTE PLAN / SCALE: I"=20'-0" Q Sn ~ sor: As NOrEO r ~i W OIwnK M.C. IWO Vendor No. Check No. Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher 1328 Vendor Name Vendor Address 'Entered by AKRF Inc. 440 Park AVe. So. Audit Date Vendor Telephone Number 212 696-0670 NY, NY 10016 Town Clerk Vendor Contact " Invoice Invoice Invoice Net Purchase Order Number Date Total Discount Amount Claim Number Description of Goods or Services General Ledger Fund and Account Number 101155 5/24/10 $1,510.05 1,510.05 21310 onsulting svices to li 8020 4 500 500 i Peer review -ELeven Mattituck Traffic Study SCTM-1000-142-1-27 Payee Certification Department Certification Signature Title Signature II Company Name Date Title f 9..~_ 1/ 1 n" Date / Q AKW INC. Environmental and Planning Consultants 440 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 (212) 696-0670 FEDERAL TAX ID NO. 13-3433475 Town of Southold Peer Review Invoice # : 101155 Attn: Kristy Winser Project: 60117 P.O. Box 1179 Project Name : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PEER Southold NY 11971 Invoice Group: L1 Invoice Date : 5/24/2010 For Professional Services Rendered through: 413012010 PO No. 21310 PM: JZ Previous Current Total Phase Code / Name Phase Fee Amount Amount % Complete Fee Earned 0100 PEER REVIEW AND TECH MEMO 4,200.00 0.00 1,510.05 35.95 1,510.05 Total Fee: 4,200.00 Total Fee Earned To Date 1,510.05 Less Previous Billings 0.00 Amount Due this Invoice 1,510.05 t ~l~, gay z ,~tholdZowa • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS OF soar P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR y~i Southold, NY 11971 Chair `p OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS • O 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI ~yCOMM Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE April 26, 2010 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ms. Jessica Zanca, AICP, Technical Director AKRF Environmental & Planning Consultants 3900 Veterans Memorial Highway - Suite 300 Bohemia, NY 11716 Re: Peer Review of the SR 25 and Factory Avenue 7-Eleven Mattituck Traffic Study SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Ms. Zanca: Enclosed are: (1) signed Proposal authorizing your company to proceed with consulting work as outlined therein, and (2) approved Purchase Order not to exceed $4,200. Any work beyond this amount must be authorized in writing prior to being started. Also enclosed for your convenience is a Voucher Form for your use with each invoice submitted to this department. Should you have any questions regarding this, please feel free to call. Sincerely,] 1 c~dl9l " Kristy Winser Senior Planner Encs. 1 00 L ALD 0,00 Environmental and Planning Consultants 3900 Veterans Memorial Highway Suite 300 Bohemia, NY 11716 tel: 631 285-6980 fax: 631 285-6919 www.akr(.com V Ell, "t~ April 14, 2010 Ms. Kristy Winser APR 15 2010 Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department PO Box 1179 Southold Town 53095 Main Road Planning Boars Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposal for the Peer Review of the SR 25 and Factory Avenue 7-11 Traffic Study Dear Ms. Winer: On behalf of AKRF, Inc., thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide a peer review of the traffic study that was completed for the proposed SR 25 and Factory Avenue 7-11 store. This letter serves as our proposal and fee estimate for such services. AKRF brings excellent resources and credentials to this assignment. We can provide the Town of Southold traffic planning and engineering expertise that will enable you to be confident that the traffic study prepared by Dunn Engineering has adequately analyzed and addressed the potential traffic impacts associated with this proposed project. AKRF's professional staff-comprised of planners, engineers (both traffic and site design), natural resource, noise, and air quality specialists, economists, landscape architects, and urban designers-has particular expertise in New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, environmental analysis and review, and Environmental Impact Statement preparation. Our approximately 190 person firm is one of the most respected planning and environmental consulting firms in the tri-4tate region. We have a full complement of professional staff in our Long Island office, as well as New York City, White Plains, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Maryland. Our value would be to quickly come up to speed on the components of the proposed project, synthesize the data in the traffic study, and provide our findings on the substantive issues. For the proposed assignment, Anthony Russo will serve as the Principal-in-Charge. Anthony has over 25 years of experience in managing traffic analyses and studies. I, as the Director of the Long Island office, will serve as the project manager. I have over 10 years of experience in planning, environmental analyses and review, and permitting on the Island. AKRF will work diligently to complete our review as quickly as we can and anticipate completion within two - three weeks of our authorization to proceed. AKRF, Inc. • New York City • Hudson Valley Region • Long Island • Baltimore I Washington Area • New Jersey • Connecticut The cost to review the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) and prepare a technical memorandum that provides the Town with traffic, capacity, methodology, parking, circulation, queuing, and safety comments based on our review of the Dunn Engineering Associates TIS dated February 2010 would be $4,200 (this cost includes a field visit to the project site by our senior traffic engineer to assess existing traffic operating conditions and issues). In addition, AKRF would need from the applicant the AutoCad/AutoTurn computer files so we can confirm that the truck circulation analysis illustrated in the TIS both on-site and at the project site driveways was performed correctly. Any meetings with the Town would be billed at our standard hourly billing rates listed below. Any subsequent review of the revised traffic study would also be billed at our hourly rates. However, upon request, AKRF could also provide a lump sum fee for this work. AKRF Standard Billing Rates Employee Category Hourly Rate Officer $210 Senior Technical Director $180 Technical Director $155 Senior Professional $130 Professional II $120 Professional I $110 Technical II $100 Technical I $85 Notes: Out of pocket expenses will be billed at 1.05 times actual cost. These rates are effective through December 31, 2010. If the proposal as outlined above, including Appendix A-our Standard Terms and Conditions-are acceptable, please have an authorized person countersign this letter and return it to us as our contract and notice to proceed. If you have any questions regarding our proposal and/or approach please feel free to contact me at (631) 574-3723 or Anthony at (914) 922-2359. Our respective email contacts are izanca~n akrfcom and arussoO,,akrf corn Again, we thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal and we look forward to getting started with you on this project. Sincerely, Jessica Zanca, AICP Anthony P. Russo Technical Director Vice President i ACKNOWLEDGE AND CCEPTED: Signature: Title: p1a_^~ For: tbu~ S til~o~,l Date: _~'I]to~ p APPENDIX A Terms and Conditions Consulting Agreement (this "Agreement"), dated as of April 14, 2010, between AKRF, Inc. (the "Consultant"), with an address at 3900 Veterans Memorial Highway, Bohemia, New York 11716, and the Town of Southold (the " lient"), with an address at 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971. 1. Services. Subject to the terms and conditions hereof, the Client hereby engages the Consultant to perform, and Consultant hereby agrees to provide, certain professional services in connection with the project (the "Proiect') relating to certain site or sites (collectively, the `Site"). The Services shall include, among other things, furnishing all reports, drawings and/or other work product (collectively, the "Deliverables"). 2. Compensation, Invoicing and Payment. The Client shall pay the Consultant the initial retainer and the other amounts, and reimburse Consultant's expenses, at the times and in the manner set forth above. The Client shall pay all taxes, fees and charges applicable to the Services and any other pass-through charges (other than taxes impdsed upon the net income of the Consultant), including interest and other charges thereon chargeable by the taxing authorities. 3. Performance Standards. The Consultant shall use reasonable commercial efforts to render the Services and all other obligations under this Agreement in accordance with (i) the standard of care and skill ordinarily used by members of the same profession practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same locale and (ii) all applicable codes, regulations, ordinances, and laws in effect as of the date of the execution of this Agreement. Neither the Consultant's entering into this Agreement nor any performance hereunder by the Consultant, or any affiliate or subcontractor thereof, shall create any fiduciary obligation owed to the Client or any other person or entity. Except for the performance standards described above, the Consultant is making no express or implied warranties, including those of merchantability, accuracy or fitness for a particular purpose, regarding the Services or any Deliverables. The Consultant shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any subcontractor, supplier or other personnel based on requests made or directions or instructions provided by the Client to any subcontractor, supplier or other personnel engaged by Consultant unless the Client first discusses such requests, directions or instructions with Consultant and Consultant agrees that the requests, directions or instructions are part of the Services to be provided hereunder. In the event of an emergency affecting the health or safety of persons or property, the Consultant may act, in its reasonable discretion, to prevent threatened damage, injury or loss to person or property notwithstanding that it may be outside the scope of the Services or not approved in advance by the Client. 4. Indemnification. a. The Consultant agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold the Client, it subsidiaries and affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees, owners, subcontractors and agents (collectively, the "Client Parties") harmless from any damage, liability, or cost (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of defense) to the extent caused by the Consultant's negligence. b. The Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold the Consultant, its subsidiaries and affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees, owners, subcontractors and agents (collectively, the "Consultant Parties") harmless from any damage, liability, or cost (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of defense); (i) to the extent caused by the Client's negligence, or (ii.) relating directly or indirectly to the presence or suspected presence at any time of asbestos, or hazardous or toxic materials on or about the Project Site, arising out of, or in any way connected with, the performance or nonperformance of the obligations under this Agreement by the Consultant (unless and until there has been an adjudication by a court or forum of competent jurisdiction that the claims at issue are a direct result of the sole negligence of the Consultant), or (iii.) to the extent arising from or attributable to the failure of the Client to timely and/or properly implement or adhere to recommendations, designs, specifications, work plans or other items specifying or outlining the construction and/or implementation of future work beyond this Scope of Work provided by Consultant in Deliverables. c. As a condition to claiming any indemnification hereunder, the applicable indemnified party (i) shall promptly provide the applicable indemnifying party with written notice of any claim sufficiently promptly and in sufficient detail to avoid prejudicing the defense of such claim; (ii) shall not settle or compromise any such claim without the indemnifying party's written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and (iii) shall promptly provide reasonable cooperation relating to defending such claim. The indemnified party may, at its own expense, assist in the defense if it so chooses, but shall not be permitted to control such defense or any negotiations relating to the settlement of any such claim so long as the party responsible for indemnification hereunder. is actively defending such claim. Notwithstanding clause (ii) above, if the party responsible for indemnification hereunder refuses or fails to timely defend the claim or abandons such defense, the indemnified party(parties) may settle such claim without the A-1 prior consent of the indemnifying party and the indemnifying party shall remain fully liable to indemnify the indemnified party(parties) to the extent that the indemnified party(parties) are otherwise entitled to indemnification , for such claim under this Section 4. d. No party shall be liable for any claim or cause of action seeking indemnification under this Section 4, regardless of the type or nature of the action, if such action is brought more than three years after the applicable cause of action has accrued. e. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT OR IN ANY DOCUMENT SIGNED BETWEEN THE PARTIES REGARDING THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS AGREEMENT, EITHER PRIOR OR SUBSEQUENT TO THIS AGREEMENT, IN NO EVENT SHALL ANY PARTY HERETO, OR ANY OFFICER, DIRECTOR, OWNER OR AGENT THEREOF, BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OF PROFITS OR REVENUE, OR LOSS OR INACCURACY OF DATA OR MATERIAL OR FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, WHETHER IN AN ACTION IN CONTRACT OR TORT OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF THE SAME HAS BEEN SPECIFICALLY ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITIES OF SUCH DAMAGES, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT ANY SUCH DAMAGES ARE PAYABLE BY ONE OF THE PARTIES HERETO TO A THIRD PARTY AND THE CLAIM IS ONE FOR WHICH THE PARTY REQUIRED (WHETHER BY JUDGMENT, SETTLEMENT OR OTHERWISE) TO PAY SUCH DAMAGES IS ENTITLED TO INDEMNIFICATION UNDER THIS SECTION 4. 5. Limitation of Liability. The Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to limit the liability of the Consultant Parties hereunder to the Client and to all construction contractors, subcontractors on the Project and others under the Client's control for any and all claims, losses, costs, damages of any nature whatsoever, or expenses from any cause or causes, regardless of the nature or type of action, so that the total aggregate liability of the Consultant Parties shall not exceed the compensation actually paid to Consultant for services rendered on this Project under this Agreement during the three month period immediately before the applicable claim accrued. 6. Term. This Agreement shall have a tern commencing on the date of this Agreement and ending, unless terminated earlier as provided herein, when the Services are completed or as otherwise set forth on annexed Attachment A. A party may terminate this Agreement by delivery of written notice to the other if (i) the other party commits a material breach of this Agreement and fails to remedy such breach within 30 days after receipt of written notice specifying the alleged breach in reasonable detail, or (ii) any party makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, a. voluntary or involuntary petition is filed by or against a party under any bankruptcy or insolvency law, or under the provisions of any law of like import, or a trustee or receiver is appointed for any party or its property. If full payment is not received by the Consultant by the applicable due date, then the Consultant may, at its discretion and without liability, terminate this Agreement or suspend any Services to be performed hereunder upon 10 days prior written notice. If the Project is suspended for any reason for more than 60 calendar days in the aggregate (whether or not consecutive), the Consultant may, at its discretion and without liability, terminate this Agreement Upon any termination of this Agreement, the Consultant shall be paid in full in accordance with the terms of this Agreement for all Services rendered and reimbursable expenses incurred through the date of termination, including reasonable termination costs. 7. Miscellaneous. This Agreement supersedes any written or oral proposal or other communication between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. The rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York, without regard to principles of conflicts of laws and each party consents to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of any state or federal court in New York County, New York, for the resolution of any disputes. The provisions of Sections 4,5 and this Section 7 shall survive completion of performance in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and final payment hereunder or any termination of this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed and delivered by facsimile and in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their authorized representatives and made effective as of the date first set forth above. A-2 G1(~ ItAKRF Environmental and Planning Consultants 3900 Veterans Memorial Highway Suite 300 Bohemia, NY 11716 tel: 631 285-6980 fax: 631 285-6919 www.akrf.com f I~ ~ 1 April 14, 2010 r - Ms. Kristy Winser APO 1 5 2010 Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department PO Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposal for the Peer Review of the SR 25 and Factory Avenue 7-11 Traffic Study Dear Ms. Winser: On behalf of AKRF, Inc., thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide a peer review of the traffic study that was completed for the proposed SR 25 and Factory Avenue 7-11 store. This letter serves as our proposal and fee estimate for such services. AKRF brings excellent resources and credentials to this assignment. We can provide the Town of Southold traffic planning and engineering expertise that will enable you to be confident that the traffic study prepared by Dunn Engineering has adequately analyzed and addressed the potential traffic impacts associated with this proposed project. AKRF's professional staff-comprised of planners, engineers (both traffic and site design), natural resource, noise, and air quality specialists, economists, landscape architects, and urban designers-has particular expertise in New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, environmental analysis and review, and Environmental Impact Statement preparation. Our approximately 190 person firm is one of the most respected planning and environmental consulting firms in the tri-state region. We have a full complement of professional staff in our Long Island office, as well as New York City, White Plains, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Maryland. Our value would be to quickly come up to speed on the components of the proposed project, synthesize the data in the traffic study, and provide our findings on the substantive issues. For the proposed assignment, Anthony Russo will serve as the Principal-in-Charge. Anthony has over 25 years of experience in managing traffic analyses and studies. I, as the Director of the Long Island office, will serve as the project manager. I have over 10 years of experience in planning, environmental analyses and review, and permitting on the Island. AKRF will work diligently to complete our review as quickly as we can and anticipate completion within two - three weeks of our authorization to proceed. AKRF, Inc. • New York City • Hudson Valley Region • Long Island • Baltimore I Washington Area • New Jersey • Connecticut The cost to review the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) and prepare a technical memorandum that provides the Town with traffic, capacity, methodology, parking, circulation, queuing, and safety comments based on our review of the Dunn Engineering Associates TIS dated February 2010 would be $4,200 (this cost includes a field visit to the project site by our senior traffic engineer to assess existing traffic operating conditions and issues). In addition, AKRF would need from the applicant the AutoCad/AutoTurn computer files so we can confirm that the truck circulation analysis illustrated in the TIS both on-site and at the project site driveways was performed correctly. Any meetings with the Town would be billed at our standard hourly billing rates listed below. Any subsequent review of the revised traffic study would also be billed at our hourly rates. However, upon request, AKRF could also provide a lump sum fee for this work. AKRF Standard Billing Rates Employee Category Hourly Rate Officer $210 Senior Technical Director $180 Technical Director $155 Senior Professional $130 Professional 11 $120 Professional I $110 Technical II $100 Technical I $85 Notes: Out of pocket expenses will be billed at 1.05 times actual cost. These rates are effective through December 31, 2010. If the proposal as outlined above, including Appendix A--our Standard Terms and Conditions-are acceptable, please have an authorized person countersign this letter and return it to us as our contract and notice to proceed. If you have any questions regarding our proposal and/or approach please feel free to contact me at (631) 574-3723 or Anthony at (914) 922-2359. Our respective email contacts are izancaL?akrfconr and arussowg akrfconc. Again, we thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal and we look forward to getting started with you on this project. Sincerely, Cjxx~ Jessica Zanca, AICP Anthony P. Russo Technical Director Vice President ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED: Signature: Title: For: Date: APPENDIX A Terms and Conditions Consulting Agreement (this "Agreement"), dated as of April 14, 2010, between AKRF, Inc. (the "Consultant"), with an address at 3900 Veterans Memorial Highway, Bohemia, New York 11716, and the Town of Southold (the "Client"), with an address at 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971. 1. Services. Subject to the terms and conditions hereof, the Client hereby engages the Consultant to perform, and Consultant hereby agrees to provide, certain professional services in connection with the project (the "Pro iect•') relating to certain site or sites (collectively, the "Site"). The Services shall include, among other things, furnishing all reports, drawings and/or other work product (collectively, the "Deliverables"). 2. Compensation, Invoicing and Payment. The Client shall pay the Consultant the initial retainer and the other amounts, and reimburse Consultant's expenses, at the times and in the manner set forth above. The Client shall pay all taxes, fees and charges applicable to the Services and any other pass-through charges (other than taxes imposed upon the net income of the Consultant), including interest and other charges thereon chargeable by the taxing authorities. 3. Performance Standards. The Consultant shall use reasonable commercial efforts to render the Services and all other obligations under this Agreement in accordance with (i) the standard of care and skill ordinarily used by members of the same profession practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same locale and (ii) all applicable codes, regulations, ordinances, and laws in effect as of the date of the execution of this Agreement. Neither the Consultant's entering into this Agreement nor any performance hereunder by the Consultant, or any affiliate or subcontractor thereof, shall create any fiduciary obligation owed to the Client or any other person or entity. Except for the performance standards described above, the Consultant is making no express or implied warranties, including those of merchantability, accuracy or fitness for a particular purpose, regarding the Services or any Deliverables. The Consultant shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any subcontractor, supplier or other personnel based on requests made or directions or instructions provided by the Client to any subcontractor, supplier or other personnel engaged by Consultant unless the Client first discusses such requests, directions or instructions with Consultant and Consultant agrees that the requests, directions or instructions are part of the Services to be provided hereunder. In the event of an emergency affecting the health or safety of persons or property, the Consultant may act, in its reasonable discretion, to prevent threatened damage, injury or loss to person or property notwithstanding that it may be outside the scope of the Services or not approved in advance by the Client. 4. Indemnification. a. The Consultant agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold the Client, it subsidiaries and affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees, owners, subcontractors and agents (collectively, the "Client Parties") harmless from any damage, liability, or cost (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of defense) to the extent caused by the Consultant's negligence. b. The Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold the Consultant, its subsidiaries and affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees, owners, subcontractors and agents (collectively, the "Consultant Parties") harmless from any damage, liability, or cost (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of defense); (i) to the extent caused by the Client's negligence, or (ii.) relating directly or indirectly to the presence or suspected presence at any time of asbestos, or hazardous or toxic materials on or about the Project Site, arising out of, or in any way connected with, the performance or nonperformance of the obligations under this Agreement by the Consultant (unless and until there has been an adjudication by a court or forum of competent jurisdiction that the claims at issue are a direct result of the sole negligence of the Consultant), or (iii.) to the extent arising from or attributable to the failure of the Client to timely and/or properly implement or adhere to recommendations, designs, specifications, work plans or other items specifying or outlining the construction and/or implementation of future work beyond this Scope of Work provided by Consultant in Deliverables. c. As a condition to claiming any indemnification hereunder, the applicable indemnified party (i) shall promptly provide the applicable indemnifying party with written notice of any claim sufficiently promptly and in sufficient detail to avoid prejudicing the defense of such claim; (ii) shall not settle or compromise any such claim without the indemnifying party's written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and (iii) shall promptly provide reasonable cooperation relating to defending such claim. The indemnified party may, at its own expense, assist in the defense if it so chooses, but shall not be permitted to control such defense or any negotiations relating to the settlement of any such claim so long as the party responsible for indemnification hereunder is actively defending such claim. Notwithstanding clause (ii) above, if the party responsible for indemnification hereunder refuses or fails to timely defend the claim or abandons such defense, the indemnified party(parties) may settle such claim without the A-1 prior consent of the indemnifying party and the indemnifying party shall remain fully liable to indemnify the indemnified party(parties) to the extent that the indemnified party(parties) are otherwise entitled to indemnification for such claim under this Section 4. d. No party shall be liable for any claim or cause of action seeking indemnification under this Section 4, regardless of the type or nature of the action, if such action is brought more than three years after the applicable cause of action has accrued. e. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT OR IN ANY DOCUMENT SIGNED BETWEEN THE PARTIES REGARDING THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS AGREEMENT, EITHER PRIOR OR SUBSEQUENT TO THIS AGREEMENT, IN NO EVENT SHALL ANY PARTY HERETO, OR ANY OFFICER, DIRECTOR, OWNER OR AGENT THEREOF, BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OF PROFITS OR REVENUE, OR LOSS OR INACCURACY OF DATA OR MATERIAL OR FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, WHETHER IN AN ACTION IN CONTRACT OR TORT OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF THE SAME HAS BEEN SPECIFICALLY ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITIES OF SUCH DAMAGES, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT ANY SUCH DAMAGES ARE PAYABLE BY ONE OF THE PARTIES HERETO TO A THIRD PARTY AND THE CLAIM IS ONE FOR WHICH THE PARTY REQUIRED (WHETHER BY JUDGMENT, SETTLEMENT OR OTHERWISE) TO PAY SUCH DAMAGES IS ENTITLED TO INDEMNIFICATION UNDER THIS SECTION 4. 5. Limitation of Liability. The Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to limit the liability of the Consultant Parties hereunder to the Client and to all construction contractors, subcontractors on the Project and others under the Client's control for any and all claims, losses, costs, damages of any nature whatsoever, or expenses from any cause or causes, regardless of the nature or type of action, so that the total aggregate liability of the Consultant Parties shall not exceed the compensation actually paid to Consultant for services rendered on this Project under this Agreement during the three month period immediately before the applicable claim accrued. 6. Term. This Agreement shall have a tern commencing on the date of this Agreement and ending, unless terminated earlier as provided herein, when the Services are completed or as otherwise set forth on annexed Attachment A. A party may terminate this Agreement by delivery of written notice to the other if (i) the other party commits a material breach of this Agreement and fails to remedy such breach within 30 days after receipt of written notice specifying the alleged breach in reasonable detail, or (ii) any party makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, a voluntary or involuntary petition is filed by or against a party under any bankruptcy or insolvency law, or under the provisions of any law of like import, or a trustee or receiver is appointed for any party or its property. If full payment is not received by the Consultant by the applicable due date, then the Consultant may, at its discretion and without liability, terminate this Agreement or suspend any Services to be performed hereunder upon 10 days prior written notice. If the Project is suspended for any reason for more than 60 calendar days in the aggregate (whether or not consecutive), the Consultant may, at its discretion and without liability, terminate this Agreement. Upon any termination of this Agreement, the Consultant shall be paid in full in accordance with the terms of this Agreement for all Services rendered and reimbursable expenses incurred through the date of termination, including reasonable termination costs. 7. Miscellaneous. This Agreement supersedes any written or oral proposal or other communication between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. The rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York, without regard to principles of conflicts of laws and each party consents to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of any state or federal court in New York County, New York, for the resolution of any disputes. The provisions of Sections 4, 5 and this Section 7 shall survive completion of performance in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and final payment hereunder or any termination of this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed and delivered by facsimile and in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their authorized representatives and made effective as of the date first set forth above. A-2 r MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMB f if so P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR y~l Southold, NY 11971 Chair Q OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G • 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI IiYCOU'M'~ Southold, NY II 1, Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 April 13, 2010 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AKRF, Inc Att: Jessica Zanca 3900 Veterans Memorial Highway Suite 300 Bohemia, NY 11716 Re: Traffic Study for a site plan Known as Seven Eleven Located on the N/E comer of Factory Ave and SR 25 Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Ms. Zanca, Please find enclosed a site plan and a traffic study on disk for a proposed convenience store as referenced above. As mentioned in my email the Planning Board would be interested to have you review a traffic analysis and provide your comments on the above matter. Please provide an estimate to me for the cost of your consulting services for review for you to determine whether the analysis submitted adequately addresses the following information that was included in a letter to the applicant: 1. The Traffic Impact Analysis should be based on current data, and should include the following elements: a. A review of the existing roadway conditions and traffic volumes in the vicinity of the site (the applicant may request the Traffic Impact Analysis for the J.P Morgan Chase Bank site plan which contains traffic counts from August, 2009, which the Planning Board would accept as adequate for reflecting current conditions); b. Projections of the traffic volumes expected to be generated by the 7-11; c. An analysis of existing and future roadway and site driveway operations that includes but is not limited to the following: 1. Levels of service for the intersections nearby 2. The expected Level of Service for the driveways, and describe whether the queue can be accommodated on-site, and whether queuing at the driveways will impede on-site circulation. 1 r l • 3. An analysis of conflicts with driveways across the street and nearby including: a. Stacking on Factory Avenue, and the potential for cars exiting the site to block the northbound lane of Factory Avenue b. Cars backing out of Magic Fountain c. Boats and boat trailers exiting and entering driveway across Factory Avenue from the site driveway. d. Truck stacking on Factory for Waldbaums 4. A review of the Site Plan focusing on the proposed site access, parking layout, and circulation patterns, including truck ingress and egress to the site and to and from Factory Avenue (truck templates submitted do not show the complete turning movement); d. Describe the 7-11 delivery truck routes for the region and how this new 7-11 will be served by delivery trucks - (e.g. will the trucks travel westbound on Rt. 25 and enter from there, or will they be eastbound and attempt to enter from Factory Avenue?); L Accidents - identify the level of and current trend for accidents at the Factory Avenue and Route 25 intersection, and along Factory Avenue and Route 25 within 200' of the intersection, and identify any predicted or expected increase in accident rates as a result of the new 7-11 site; and ii. Recommendations and conclusions, including any mitigation for identified impacts and proposed solutions to identified site circulation problems. Thank you for your time. Please contact me anytime with questions you may have @ 765-1938. Best re ards, Kristy Winser Senior Planner Encls. 2 2010-04-08 08:41 N R BRAS# 6317346235 • P 212 ` G y SOUTHOLD TRANSPORTATION 1, COMMISSION ~TL Town Hell P. 0. Box 1179 53895 Main Road SWOW. NY 11971059 Pho (631765-1938 Fax(631)7653136 TO: Martin Sidor, Chairman Planning Board I FROM: Neboysha R. Brashich, Chairman DATE: April 7, 2010 RE: Traffic Impact Study - February 2010 7-Eleven Convenience Store, Mattituck The Commission reviewed the subject study during its March 29, 2010 monthly meeting. We concluded that basically all our previous concerns have been met. There is no significant impact on the property based on design. The redevelopment of the existing property is considered an improvement to the existing site conditions. The Commission supports the conclusion and endorses acceptance of the traffic study. APR - 2010 2010-04-08 08:41 N R BRAS* 6317346235 P 112 41 1 d SOUTHOLD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION sown HaN P. O. Boy 1179 55095 Abh Rued SWkW, NY 11971-0959 Phone (631) 765.1869 Fm(631)765-1823 April S, 2010 FAX 765-3136 ATT: Kristy Dunn Engineering Associate?.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street I v Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978l~ 631-288-2480 Li 631-288-2544 Fax (I L April 7, 2010 Ms. Kristy Winser APR _ 2010 Senior Planner Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Re: Proposed Convenience Market n/e/c NYS Rte 25 at Factory Avenue Mattituck, New York Dear Ms. Winser: As requested by Ms. Patricia Moore, Esq., the attorney for the applicant of the above project, enclosed for your file is one (1) set of Roadway Improvement Plans depicting roadway and traffic signal improvements at the corner of NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue in Mattituck, Town of Southold, New York. These plans have been submitted to NYSDOT for final review and approval for the work shown. Also enclosed is the cover letter submitted with the plans. As you are aware, the applicant has entered into an agreement with NYSDOT whereby the applicant will provide the design for the roadway and traffic signal improvements, will implement the roadway improvements, and will also provide the property dedication necessary to implement the improvements. NYSDOT under a requirements contract, will implement the traffic signal improvements. In this manner, the existing non-standard turning radius at the northeast corner will be significantly improved, at no cost to the town. Please note that, as indicated on the plans, these plans refer only to the signal work and radius improvement, and the site plan for the project prevails for all other work outside that area. Since the site plan is not yet finalized, the site details shown on our plans may not reflect the most recent site plan. This has no bearing on the design of the off-site roadway and traffic signal improvements. In addition, it is our understanding that the Town would like NYSDOT to impose right turn on red restrictions for westbound to northbound right turns at this location. DEA was not aware of this issue prior to submission of the plans; however, we have no objection to the restriction, and it has little or no impact on the capacity of the intersection. If NYSDOT agrees to the restriction, then the turn restriction can be imposed at the completion of the traffic signal work, which NYSDOT has agreed to complete. Ms. Kristy Winser April 7, 2010 Page 2 If you have any questions or need any further information, please contact me. I can be reached at the above telephone number bye it at vcorrado@dunn-pc.com. 7 Sinc ely, Vincent A. Corrado, P.E. Associate Engineer VC:lam L2010073 P28104 Encls. cc: Patricia Moore, Esq., via email George Abi Zeid, via email Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11976 631-288-2480 631-288-2544 Fax March 31, 2010 Mr. Shaik A. Saad, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety I APO State Dof New epartment York Department of Transportation i f State Office Building 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mark Wolfgang Proposed 7-11 NB Corner Rt. 25 @ Factory Ave. Mattituck, New York NYSDOT Case No. 01-099P SCTM No. 1000-142-01-27 Dear Mr. Saad: This is in response to your letter of December 8, 2009, in which you provided review comments on the Roadway Improvement Plans dated August 11, 2009 submitted in connection with the above project. The plans show the improvement of the radius on the northeast corner of NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue, and the traffic signal work required to accommodate this radius improvement. As indicated in the your letter of March 25, 2009 to DSC Construction Corp., the applicant will be responsible for the radius improvement, and the traffic signal and utility work will be handled by NYSDOT under a State contract. The property dedication required to implement this improvement is also indicated on the plans. Enclosed are eight (8) sets of the revised plans. Please note that this response letter and revised plans refer only to those comments made on the plans submitted by DEA. Comments regarding site plan issues will be addressed by the site engineer. For ease of review, we have repeated the comments from your letter here, followed by our response to each. Comment #1 The work zone traffic control is insufficient. At the least, intersection control should be shown as well as lane shifting in front of business. Mr. Shaik A. Saad, P.E. March 31, 2010 Page 2 Response #1 The work zone traffic control plans have been revised to provide additional schemes for intersection control and lane shifting in front of the property. Comment #2 On Sheet SP-1 ramp is not aligned with crosswalk. Response #2 The ramp is shown correctly on this submittal. SP-1 was prepared by others. Comment #3 Site plan sheets show a crosswalk going across the Route 25 exit/entrance. Please verify if this is to be striped out. If so, please designate by item number. Two (2) parallel lines instead of ladder type should be sufficient. Response #3 Please see site plan prepared by others. Comment #4 Please callout the proposed ramps' "TYPE" for all sidewalk ramps. Add flares where needed. Response #4 Sidewalk ramp types are called out on the plans. Comment #5 Please install all proposed crosswalks as illustrated in the crosswalk detail sheet enclosed with marked up plans and comments. Response #5 All crosswalks are shown as per the crosswalk detail sheet. Comment #6 The countdown timer shall be mounted underneath the pedestrian hand/man indicator. Depict this configuration within the Sequence Table. Also show the pedestrian movements within the phasing diagrams. Response #6 The sequence table now shows the pedestrian countdown timer underneath the hand/man indicator. Phasing diagrams have been revised to show pedestrian movements. Comment #7 Show the pedestrian movements in the sequence table's phasing diagrams. • Mr. Shaik A. Saad, P.E. March 31, 2010 Page 3 Response #7 The phasing diagrams now show the pedestrian movements. Note that the pedestrian phase has been revised to nun within Phase 3 for southbound Factory Avenue. Comment #8 A Microcomputer Signal Operations Specifications (MSOS) Table is required to show where the proposed cable will be wired in the cabinet. Response #8 The traffic signal plan now includes an MSOS sheet. Comment #9 Sheet 5 of 6, in Note #5, the Yd line should read as follows, "...TURNED ON (INCLUDING FLASHING OPERATION) WITHOUT NYS TRAFFIC SIGNAL PERSONNEL PRESENT..." Response #9 The note has been revised as requested. Comment #10 In Note #7, change the proposed sign from "R6-12C" to "R10-3E" from the National MUTCD. Response #10 The note has been revised as requested. Comment #11 The correct item number for Pedestrian Countdown Timers is 03680.8150, make appropriate changes to the callouts and estimate table. Response #11 The callouts and estimate table have been revised to reflect the correct item number. Comment #12 The correct item number for Removal of Traffic Signal Equipment is 10680.79, make changes to the callouts and estimate table. Response #12 The callouts and estimate table have been revised to reflect the correct item number. Continent #13 The NIS crosswalk needs to be evaluated due to its distance from its associated side street movement (NB). The signal may need to be re-phased to take this potential problem into account. Mr. Shaik A. Saad, P.E. March 31, 2010 Page 4 Response #13 The crosswalk was relocated slightly to the east to accommodate the increases radius on the northeast comer. The signal has been re-phased so that the pedestrian phase now runs with Phase 3. Comment #14 Do we now need a westbound to southbound arrow, especially in light of a fully protected eastbound to northbound arrow? Response #14 This signal was originally constructed with a westbound to southbound left turn phase, which was removed by NYSDOT under Traffic Signal Requirements Contract #D258355, dated January 2001. Comment #15 We recommend removing the entire existing sidewalk and reconstructing to current DOT Standards. Sidewalk shall be 5' wide and placed behind a minimum 36' wide turf utility strip. Response #15 The enclosed plans show new 5' sidewalk and 3' turf utility strip within the project area. See site plan prepared by others for sidewalk outside the project area. Comment #16 There is an existing pedestrian signal button at the corner. Indicate where it will be relocated after construction. Modify sidewalk area to insure ADA compliant access to the button. Response #16 The plans show the relocated pedestrian button, and the sidewalk area has been modified to meet ADA requirements. Comment #17 Why are the crosswalks hatched? Response #17 Crosswalks are correctly shown within the project area at the northeast corner of Route 25 and Factory Avenue. Crosswalks at the site driveway are shown on the site plan prepared by others and are not part of this submission. Comment #18 Reconstructing the entrance is going to require work in front of the neighboring property. We also suggest reconstructing the sidewalk here to create continuous compliance. If the ramp at the Mr. Shaik A. Saad, P.E. March 31, 2010 Page 5 entrance to the shopping center is to remain, add notes indicating that any new construction shall meet flush and level. Response #18 The plans enclosed deal only with the area in the immediate vicinity of the northeast corner. All other work along the State frontage is shown on the site plan, prepared by others. Comment #19 Add all applicable details, notes and item numbers to proposed work in the State ROW. Response #19 The plans show all applicable details, notes, and item numbers. Comment #20 We would like to require appropriate street tree planting in our ROW area as part of NYSDOT's initiative to increase tree planting statewide. The landscape plan submitted addresses only private property development requirements. Response #20 The plans enclosed deal only with the area in the immediate vicinity of the northeast comer. All other work along the State frontage is shown on the site plan, prepared by others. The landscaping issue should be discussed with the applicant's site engineer. Comment #21 We suggest planting four (4) DED resistant heritage elms - Ulmus Americana `Valley Forge', `Princeton' or `New Harmony' at 40' on center for the long term enhancement of the highway corridor. Placement is to occur behind the new sidewalk, and approximately midway between the edge of concrete and the ROW line. Response #21 The plans enclosed deal only with the area in the immediate vicinity of the northeast corner. All other work along the State frontage is shown on the site plan, prepared by others. The landscaping issue should be discussed with the applicant's site engineer. Comment #22 Please refer to the marked-up plans sheets for additional comments and corrections. Response #22 All other comments and corrections have been addressed. Mr. Shaik A. Saad, P.E. March 31, 2010 Page 6 Please review this submittal, and provide us with your comments. If you have any questions, or need any further information, please call me at 631 288 2480 ext 1128, or email me at corrado@dunn-pc.com. Sin ely, VINCENT AN O CORRADO, P.E. Associate Engineer L2010060 P28104 cc: George Abi Zeid, President, GAZ Realty 7-11 CONVENIENCE STORE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25 MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK NYSDOT CASE NO. 01-099P etr +s` LOCATION MAP • SC :r-2W MARCH 29, 2010 SHEET NO. DWG. NO. DESCRIPTION 1 TITLE SHEET 2 MD-1 TYPICAL SECTION AND MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 3 RP-1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN ZD DUNN 4 PM-1 PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING PLAN ENGINEERING 5 TSP-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN SIGNAL NO. 83.6 NYS ROUTE 25 AT FACTORY AVEISIGSBEE RD. 6 TSP-2 MICROCOMPUTER SIGNAL OPERATION SPECIFICATIONS - SIGNAL NO. 0.6 ASSOCIATES, P.C. 7-8 MPT-I-MPT-2 MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC PLAN C .ItNy EnyN.. N Main Street i~ fm , N.Y. 112A NDTEB: I. kI NO..8 NENNNBNBEI xnC. BETTE mTx T1E E81 void Ftli CIWINwTNx .U,E BEE.IN,IeJO9ECIPIGTwIK OPrN1EW vON( MM BiPIE OBFAIMEM EFT.. DPD FUIIDEPIXPAYFIpT PXOPoeED...W(. 8EE 91iE AN R.Vl9 AND 8ITLL Y REEHEVEA AEINI TIIFI, I TNETE I W7 HP NEBENWMEge0IH6A3PW.LT PAVBdI PIIOPoE .BBINB EWd IN AEEER EN AGGpiWCEmTI DENi0R0101. EXISTING POW. TINE yAx2 PgpPCBEp PNM95EDpE8M tpl DEDCATYIH IJHE F%'SING SIDfWA- 6"SL% ARU ypp 1 E%ISTING PUNTED [mlra wwmexr TOranx rwrvSOwxaxlwlNnTN~umm r7 ?xoemmnn urmo~o.N eMmT w orueBxr~ dwounw-nw.e~amxomo® • rw oermwxw~. n IN' eoevAx na ~a.rmm x+® OI asv[w.[ •mm~m w•m.®~~~ r eemamrme-na~>n~m~m HoPSTIwl1 .una ~nnra®ric~rnpwo orurt.num.m 'qq I - TYPICAL SECTICINI ALONG FA - (LOOKING NORTHOG FACTORY AVE) ® CONCRETE CURB TYPE VF-iw DETAIL ® B.IVTESPtli PGIONER.NBC..IE4EL ITB.I DEDJ 105 _ 11PM1M1111E lOALL BECIpX/RIpT 1Y A9RMLT XIMIITAB WB WT 9. ® I N LLEDNN .PINMFNLLEI18 f F ; vEq vpm pru~ w¢owr.r¢nrarN RA(£DINE"IB PTWN0MENE.XVILBPLM7N . wdwia ® OFNOAIN E78ADIRB I311f90PNIM0E ~ Np°.E err.Ix¢aAT.u PCB qJm m:An amE3mev B TNE mmN...em.~x. rm~rwwaHmEpNp ~uv[nm~PwmxfTIE m.D"E •r Teawnolupew•. Acwimw.N[FmwaelwN[[mur¢ luu I eeo[w%.neIvmm • IrcmahawuwraEnrtrwNwr oxo~aopNUU.BrrJ NVSOOT CASE N0.01-G%P i `mF~x+orwle.~~.`oslrt.EB a, .mrum.1Y.m. IT- - eN wEe3wc ~mx :I"u`milp,~. w ro Nwmmx -TEm .mrmm /.35a[u'E'es.. ]`c. BmuEaExrrmnEp.,om ~pmN ...X„N. -I v~.xx cw S TIMCL r~Mavwx; zlPw• SIDEWALK CURB RAMP TYPE 4 7.11 MATnnlac T.T. I- I IN i:HVeJ xm _ xu mwNXVE.B OFTEBIwEHN MISCELLWEOUS CETPl3 TYPE B SIDEWALK LK CURB RAMP DETAIL ELEYA~ cam. uw rerxlrvxnwrnNigal nwnwxnwsoiorvnEOOm[u. µAV BE SIDEWARBCIMBT IgTTO YNE 2 8 ALI =Y 78° mm °A, I I U ..n PX° ~ v.n ~~A 9EE BITE RKl91OR WqM • . to wvl 4~ / ^ " ®2w s n Pi PMP09E0911EAry.1af. / .~Sffi 91Mp110 fEMEY _-__-__-art ~ _ n - i _ _ 3 W °..Q ® ev`~.. 2 / MAIN RO R. 25)W / I / I V .o»mr...m wn uaw~m.wrm rn mmrmmmowwvuwEnrnrmm N MTCME N0.01-00 LE111R urominumem 71ENG ® PgOPoSeo fuu ENGI `PES, OEiM.l4Pw0T h550CIAT25. P.C. PAYEIENf vnmpw.~Per'as~®uia w;glE wrnr..mezarnrF4 mm~mnawwart~m: PPRCPOSED xw°snamuw~~m 9OAVPII( 7 -1t MAT CN 0°"'e ~mmemcna.vm'n®mm rcn. uomaw.mP® - ROM AY IMPROVEMENT FL I I m•rtaw.iaur. ee~eeamx axmm all SPEED J~ LIMIT 2 I 35 ~O " s s~s~waa Nmxvx n="f U armoroamserEAC®s Q xm 4 i ~ nn r®aure ~^_PPIYG fEYF[e ll FPLig1Y xYE mm WAZZ ,..m., ew•ro~o Am a I - MAIN . ROAD,_ R. 25 z ma SPEED ~ aDSaEE ao btu uMD Np iii 2 uniDaE u y 30 sac FAST 3 ANY TIME Lm SiCPPNG ma.m.m, xxv ~ . a,,.um.a or..-~amew.aean.u. IIxE ' H ocurrx NYSGGTG NG.01-W om~im~ ENGWEExP1G A950CNTE$PC. AM D eu-µnar,ar~~en 'i i Mnaas T-11 FNITGUG( PAVEMENTMMIUNp NIp - SIGNING q ® A B SEQUENCE TABLE-SIGNAL NO. 83.6 FACES P 1102 5,6 7 18 9 10 12,13 5 0 6 0 0 0+ 01 0fi J~ N E ©~-e 0 (0 ©i WE 12'~l 1z'1z'1211 ez s. R ~ C R R R R 0w 11my~' / ~ , 0$-t O6+C R G R R R 1 R GW / ILr m m] _ R R R C G R R 0Wa ma R R ft R R C C DW / Oy m FuH R Y R R R R 1 m.....E,...o,...,..rta...,s •"•,mmm.nEmmvi mmrcmw. / ~ m em.,m„ SIIOPflwG crnrre Ili- 05 ROAD_ (S.R. 25) oETm O C .m~m..ortow.o< °B MAIN u mrt m. m m a anoxrwmmEmu~co rnxxremm ....m,. m°°'"` S 12 T. CI mm 11 UM-1-GEN-0- 11 T. LETtl ~oanm eaairt.xrturve an n..w.wo~¢wrma~rwxvaE. NV DOT C0.5E NO.01 a.~..ux.wu.xaaw~oEmwx rnw~nro.~ ENG ENGWEER ASSOCIAiI;F, P.C. mnm rnw.maa~n w~~en Ml~mao C 7-11 IMTIINCK 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SIGNAL NO. W.6 .6 5 8 SIGNAL OPERATION SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF SWITCH PACKS SIGWY NO. 93fi COUNTY SUFFOLK T 1MI. _WW_ E AL - nRIMN_'AYFNANO2lCN[gE 1 W . 1 9P3 SO v K SP4 s ' RS r,e R • NIP 6PB PO 10 Q 13.13 fM31A v 1 SP 1a SIGNAL OP TION WECIFlGTKINS TABLE OF INWT WRNG SIGNAL NO. 836 COUNrv SUFFOLK FLNCII[W Ci00. IYIE 'i nRMIN4B04iDVTO1G e1 ~xcE woP 1a1n KEY FOR WIRE COLORCODE e3 un - 14/19C-1-R1B m ocrv PRE>ExcEUm r. as xS' xxc - x-x ix m3 OEIU PREBEXCELLYP K.R r1l J PaN.uwv sax US OE CABL NE CELER'RACER p6ER THE EP COL ERS 6 IVER SORE WIPE NYSOOTC cNO_01u n COLOR B-BUCK OORANGE FUNK eeewee9wc ueR R-RED GF3REEEN W-WNRE ASSOCIATES, P.C. ~ GGRE c... u.u. np.=v. MN Ina 1® LEGEND W1° 1u~ "mm a.1R G=CIRCULAR GREEN YSI0.LIAARYE REE 10a 1m ;,=RIGHT RE GARROW REEN ARROW IEFFGEEN EN ARROW t - -~=RIGHRMAR OW :RINTREDA EN A0.ROW T-It MATTINCK 1y.130 ®=LEFT REDARRWY WGHTRED E=LEFTYELLONMROM 8RIGKT YELLOINOM PAARRON 1K UB 1w,1w o MICRO COMPUTER SIGNAL OPEMTIONS SPECIFICATIONS 03 Pm.WnON 1M1w SIGNAL NO, M.6 S B ~.m g R ~w~ 3 u 8 ~ ~m ~ itl ~I 'N - - _ ROAD- SS.R. 25 _ 31 a~ _ W owa SHOpLDErRryCLOSIINE~SCNEME OiES ...wm n,.~o..xM..,.m..i.,E.xr.,we..mr.w..w.e... LEGEND re.mwwm. •rwwwew.xwo .<wmu nm eurcra rmxxmaw.rniwew~orvremwx w euwa~ NY TCASE N0.01- 8EE 9nEEieof esw MExaECicn rwrt[r c rmpuiuawuuuurtv~ E4~xH~mmr~rc~wim.ma~.a.-a.e crx~ewxauo R'~~ 77 ENGINEERRJG.«.. cWlR0..WO VUVEdFTSCXEMES rw.wnwueEe r. ASSOCIATE,. P.C. uuwra uum nurwxuru.ux..e~m ~e~w¢lu.~wn~ Emae~eoTM~nuq~ ar.rtnewuaurtn u.urcu. rvewrwrwv~muw ~ Tiwrwlwv wO T'er.w~nw uemiunroromne °er+e EarxeurwenwEwrExrvcwomxrean®orueon o~e.roa ® .vu Nw T.11 FUT]INCN u MMNTFNNiCE AND PNOTECOON I-F OFTNAFFICR -i ruweniwxmo~rwmrtrwrtww~m iuoumxxuxn.EUVenmuauuwreertannownom ® 7 9 • Page 1 of 2 • Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:20 PM To: 'Betsy Perkins' Cc: Mark Wolfgang (E-mail); Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail); Lanza, Heather Subject: RE: Betsy; There has been process in each case and we are moving forward as planned. We had in-house scoping meetings on each application last week as well as were discussed during the Transportation Commission meeting held on Monday. For 7-11, the Transportation Committee will also be reviewing the traffic study and I'm waiting for their comments. Also, it should be noted that your approval from the Health Dept. for 7-11 is important for us to review as this may affect the site plan and design elements ( overall landscaping ect..). I also wanted to give you a heads that the DOT responded to an inquiry the Planning Board had regarding "no right hand turns on red" from Main Road @ the factory avenue intersection whereas the Transportation Commission concurred on this restriction. This issue should be addressed on your next submission to the DOT using case number 01-099P. As for Valero, I will need a floor plan to be submitted in conformance with the new legislation of the 800 sq. feet. I had advised Pat to meet with Mike Verity on this (also noted in my letter dated 1/27/10). Has this been done? I will inform you of when these applications will be ready to be scheduled for a work session. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Knsty.Wmsergtown Southold ny.us -----Original Message----- From: Betsy Perkins [mailto:mooreattys@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 11:54 AM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: Hi; Can you give me the status of Valero & Gama (Mattituck 7-11)? Thanks, Betsy Perkins LA Law Offices of 3/31/2010 0 • Page 2 of 2 William D. Moore; tel # 631 765 4663 Patricia C. Moore; tel # 631 765-4330 fax # for both; 631 765 4643 NOTICE. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the use of the named recipient only. It may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. if you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, by using your reply button to advise us of such error. Thank you. 3/31/2010 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law ~U 51020 Main Road ' Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsy Perkins - Secretaries March 26, 2010 Honorable Scott Russell and Southold Town Board MAR 26 2W 53095 Main Road j P.O.Box 1179 --i Southold, NY 11971 Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Dear Supervisor Russell and Southold Town Board: My client is the owner of the north east corner of Rt. 25 and Factory Avenue. As you know he has a pending site plan application with the Southold Planning Board to convert the existing gasoline service station with three garage bays, a canopy and an approved accessory convenience store to a single tenant, 7-11. The property has been zoned for business since the enactment of zoning in the 1950's. Its is surrounded by other commercial businesses on undersized parcels which have never received site plan review or approval and a multiple tenant shopping center. These properties have changed and increased in use without site plan review or approval. " My client has been before the Southold Town Planning board with this project since March 2009 and prepared numerous revisions to the site plan intended to address both the Town's and public's concerns. Only a few months ago you changed the parking requirements for convenience stores which affected this property. My client prefers landscaping to parking, nevertheless, he revised the site plan to address the changes to the code. The 7-11 convenience store will be the only use. Many reasonable residents recognize that this will be a significant enhancement of the intersection. The single 7-11 use is less intensive a use than a permitted gas station advertising low prices, with three repair service bays & accessory convenience store. The gasoline canopy and gas tank pumps will be removed. The CITGO sign will be removed and new signs conforming to the Town Code are proposed. The existing gas station building will be modified with significant architectural improvements. The design improvements have been reviewed and approved by the architectural review board. The site will be improved with landscaping which complies with the Town Code requirements. This redevelopment will include 35.10 % landscaping coverage. The light poles of the gas station will be replaced and comply with dark skies requirements. The entire corner will have new sidewalks with a cross walk on Rt 25. In addition, the NYSDOT has reviewed the curb cuts and recommended realignment of the entrances and exsts into the property. At no cost to the Town or the State, the owner is voluntarily making a Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law March 26, 2010 Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 land dedication of the intersection to improve existing nonconforming road conditions. Without this application for the 7-11, the Town and the State of New York would have to pursue eminent domain proceedings in order to change the road design at Factory Avenue & Route 25. An Eminent Domain proceeding would be a significant expense to the Town and State. My client is donating the corner which benefits the Town and State, at no expense to the taxpayer. A public hearing was held on October 13, 2009 providing the public an opportunity to comment on the proposed 7-11 site plan. The group which has appeared at your Town Board meetings opposing the project was present at the Planning Board public hearing and each person was given the opportunity to speak. Their comments, to the extent relevant to the project and not those alleging violations of neighboring properties, were specifically addressed and recommendations incorporated in the site plan. Despite the existence of current traffic studies ( prepared for properties improved by CVS, Hudson City, and the Cottages) the opponents insisted that the Planning Board require the applicant to prepare a "Traffic Study". In response to their comments at the public hearing, a Traffic Impact Study prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, PC for the redevelopment of the site as a 7-Eleven Convenience Store was submitted to the Planning Board on February 26, 2010. The conclusions from the Traffic Study are that the road systems are adequate for the proposed development and that the improvements to the intersection will improve the existing conditions. In addition, it was recommended that 7-11 deliveries come from the east on Rt. 25. The tenant, 7-11 has accepted this recommendation. Finally, in response to alleged loitering problems occurring at the Shopping Center which should be enforced by the owner of the Shopping Center, the Planning Board learned that 7-11 has implemented loss prevention and crime deterrence programs to combat loitering with training, visibility into and out of the stores, and video surveillance systems. The property owner has invested hundreds of thousands of dollars to purchase the business property and submit both site plans and NYSDOT plans. A first attempt to redevelop the site as a gas station with an accessory car wash was rejected. He now proposes to eliminate the gas station and accessory uses to develop a stand alone 7-11 convenience store. He has addressed every request of the Town and the opposition, both reasonable and unreasonable. Redevelopment of the site will provide needed work for the local construction industry, a franchise business for a local owner and clean good paying jobs for 7-11 employees. The use is permitted. Midway through our site plan review, the Town Board adopted changes to the parking schedule for convenience stores. The proposed 7-11 will contain almost triple the parking spaces of other 7-11's throughout Southold Town and professionally designed site circulation. The Supervisor is advocating a moratorium of site plan review specifically intended to Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law March 26, 2010 Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 adversely affect this property. The owner has endured 3 years of processing his site plan applications, has endured racial slurs referencing "those people" who own and operate 7-11 franchise, and has endured the efforts to make his application a political referendum in the last Town election. He has patiently undergone a thorough site plan review at great expense. He has proposed a site plan which complies with every aspect of the Southold Town Code. It is long past time for this application to receive approval. For the sake of justice and fairness, please do not support a moratorium which affects this property. The existing site plan process adequately addresses the redevelopment of a property. Do not punish those who comply with the Town Code. As the surrounding nonconforming properties along the Mattituck Corridor are redeveloped, it is up to the Town to require these properties to submit to reasonable site plan review. You do not need a moratorium, just Town Code compliance. Very truly y9rrs, Patricia C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. b -P PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 1 1952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsy Perkins r - Secretaries February 25, 2010 Southold Town Planning Board Martin Sidor, Chairman and Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Kristy Re: GAMA Deer .P,ark,(7-I1), Mattituck SCTM#16W-14l-17= 7 Dear Mr. Sidon As per the Planning Board's letter on the above referenced project dated December 8, 2009, the following are responses to the comments. 1. a and 1. b To be addressed in the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, PC for the redevelopment of the site as a 7-Eleven Convenience Store. With regard to the truck deliveries, the Traffic Engineer has recommended that truck deliveries enter the store from Rt 25 from the east. The vendors will be directed to tailor their routes to accommodate this delivery route for the Mattituck 7-11 store. Enclosed is a letter dated February 15, 2010 from Andrew J. Shelhorse of 7-Eleven, Inc. confirming the proposed delivery route. 2. a. Landscaping: i. "Provide a plan that demonstrates 35% landscaping coverage of the subject property. Town code section 280-Bulk schedule." 35.10% landscaping coverageisprovided. Refertosheet SP-1, site data chart. The plan shows the square footage of the site 24,140 sf less the dedication to NYS 249sf for a total land area of 23,891 sf. The land dedication is made voluntarily and in the best interest of the Town and State to improve existing nonconforming road conditions. All landscaping improvements proposed in this siteplan are within the boundaries of the property, there is additional existing landscaping between the property line and the road which will remain and is included in the NYSDOT plan ii. 25' front landscape area is required and not met. Town Code section 280-93. This property fronts on Factory Avenue and Route 25. A 25 front landscaped area cannot be met along the entire road frontage. As per SP-1, the proposed landscape plan provides more than Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law February 9, 2010 Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Manituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 25 feet on both the east and west side of Rt 25 and along Factory Avenue. The combined landscape area along Rt 25 includes approximately 20 feet of landscaping along the NYS DOT right-of-way and 5 to 7 feet, within the property, parallel to Rt 25, totaling a width of 25 feet If we were to maintain the 25 feet, the site would not even allow ample paved areafor the requiredparkingstallsfor the existing building. Given the existing conditions and development of the property, multiple existing curb cuts, all which do not have 25' offront landscaping on eitherRt 25 or FactoiyAvenue, we would respectfully request that the landscape plan be approved, as proposed, given the extensive improvements being made to the existing site conditions. If the Board wishes to include planters along the area parallel to Rt 25, as is provided in 280-93, we could design planters. iii. Northeast landscape buffer is 4 feet, pursuant to 280-95, with additional retaining walls engineered and landscaped to address the grade difference. Refer to sheets SP-1 and SP- 2. b. Parking and Parking Lot design i. Parking spaces required: Town code section 280-78 for convenience stores was modified, the number of stalls is determined based on the areas of the gross floor retail space, counter space and storage space. These areas add up to 2,275 s f. At I stall per 100 s f., 23 stalls are required. As per our revised SP-1 drawing, we are providing 26 stalls. Please note that in order to provide 35% landscaping, meet the NYSDOT curb cuts, and safe internal design circulation, 27 parking spaces can not be provided. ii. Aisles- Northeast back-up aisle 20' wide, 22' required by code. Provide parking lot aisles that meet town code. SP-1 revised. 22' back up space is provided. Refer to sheet SP-1 iii. Size of parking spaces must meet the town code- indicate parking space dimensions on plan. Min. size is 9'x 19'. Parking dimensions are shown on SP-l, minimum size providedfor non-handicapped stalls are 9'x 19'. Handicapped stalls are 8' wide x 19' long iv. Provide safe pedestrian access to the building from Factory Ave. and Rt. 25 sidewalks (see CVS and Hudson City site plans for examples. Pedestrian access- SP-1 revised. 4' wide concrete sidewalks are provided on Factory Avenue and Rt 25. A 5'8" wide pedestrian walk is designated with striping on the paved area leading from the sidewalks to the building. C. Lighting Plan i. Redesign lighting of the site to light areas where people will walk. Lighting landscape areas above I footcandle (fc) should be avoided. Illumination levels at the property line shall range between 0.0 fc and 1.0fe. Revised per recommendations of ARC, please refer to drawing PH-1 for conformance ii. Revise with light poles that meet the town code height requirement, light poles maximum Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law February 9, 2010 Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 height allowed is 14'-0". The light poles proposed are 121-10". Refer to detail 8, SheetSP-3. iii Show photometric grid extending to just beyond the property line. Photometric grid extended just beyond property line. Refer to drawing PH-1 for conformance. iv. Use lighting fixtures that do not throw intense light onto areas that do not need to be lighted, put more lights in areas that do need to be lighted (where pedestrians walk). Refer to drawing PH-1 for conformance. V. Submit cut sheets for any lighting fixtures that have been changed including the on-building lighting fixtures and the sign lighting fixtures. ARC recommended pole design Cut sheets enclosed. d. Signs i. Submit plans for all signs. Street sign shown on detail 3, sheet SP-l, building mounted sign shown on detail 3, sheet A-1. No other signs proposed. ii. No signs may be internally lit. Town Code section 280-87 Street sign and building sign to not be internally lit. Both signs are to be lit with goose neck light fixtures, as depicted on detail 3, sheet SP-1, and elevation 1, sheet A-1. e. Other Approvals i. NYSDOT outstanding issues that could affect the site design remain and must be resolved during the planning board review. Pending ii. SCHealth- Pending. SCDHS is to determine the adequacy of the existing system. If the system is deemed inadequate, a new sanitary system shall be installed in compliance with all applicable SCDHS regulations. Area ofnatural vegetation that is affected by this work shall be landscaped following new tank installation. iii. Aerial View: Overlay the site plan on an aerial photo (an aerial that is recent enough to reflect current conditions if possible) to aid in the analysis of interactions with adjacent sites and the intersection. Refer to site plan overlay, sheet SP-6. Public Hearing Comments: 1. Green Building or LEEDS- Will the proposed be developed under green building practices? The building is existing and the re-use of buildings is a Green policy. Windows and insulation will be upgraded to meet energy guidelines. Additional landscaping is also proposed. Elimination of a gas station is being terminated and a clean, dry use is proposed. 2. How will loitering concerns on site be controlled? Please refer to SP-1. Owner is proposing a 6' high chain link fence to secure the north side of the property (behind the building and Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law February 9, 2010 Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 dumpster). Also proposed are building mounted lighting to illuminate all sides of the building which will be directed towards the building. (Refer to PH-I). Additionally, 7-11 has implemented loss prevention and crime deterrence programs to combat loitering with training, visibility into and out of the stores and video surveillance systems. See enclosed portion of relevant section of loss prevention and crime deterrence study. 3. There are existing sidewalks along both Factory Ave. and Rt 25. Refer to SP-1. 4' wide concrete sidewalks are providedfrom the sidewalks on FactoryAvenue and Rt 25. A 5'-8" wide pedestrian walk is designed with striping on the paved area leading from the sidewalks to the building. There will also be 7-5" wide sidewalk in front of the building. 4. The traffic issues were addressed by the Traffic Impact study prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Enclosed are the revised site plans referred to above. This completes our response to the December 8`h letter, if there is anything else you need please do not hesitate to contact me. My client is anxious to proceed with the redevelopment of his property. Ve ul yours, ricia C. Moore ca Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. 12/11/2009 11:39 5169084999 GAZ REALTY INC PAGE 01/02 Crime Deterrence Program For more than 70 years 7-Eleven has been America's neighborhood grocery store, bringing convenience Into the lives of millions. As part of its commitment to the communities it serves and its neighborhood store employees, the company has put in place one of the most comprehensive robbery deterrence programs In the convenience store industry. 7-Eleven developed and implemented Its robbery deterrence program In 1976 based on research interviews with convicted robbers. The program has been regularly updated as ongoing research provides additional methods of combating crime in the convenience store environment. 7-Eleven stores' crime deterrence program Is centered around three components; store-personnel training, visibility Into and out of the stores and effective cash control. Additionally, 7-Eleven has installed video surveillance systems in its stores. "Operation Alert" Training 7-Eleven corporate-store employees and new franchisees participate In a multi-media training program and are supplied with comprehensive resource materials on crime deterrence and violence avoidance. The program, called "operation Alert', includes Information on security procedures, proper store maintenance, violence avoidance and recommended behaviors for managing a robbery or other potentially violent encounter. The training emphasizes the high value the company places on the safety of all 7-Eleven store personnel and customers and 7-Eleven stores' no-resistance philosophy toward robbery. At 7- Eleven, the safety of store personnel and customers Is more important than protecting the company's money or property during a robbery. Store personnel also learn techniques recommended by the robbers themselves for responding to negative situations in a way that helps keep them from escalating into violent incidents. The "Fishbowl" Research indicates that robbers don't like stores that are brightly lit, with store sales associates and cash registers clearly visible from the street. That is why 7-Eleven puts the cash registers In the front of the stores and keeps windows in front of the sales area free of signs and merchandise so police and others can see inside. It's called the "fishbowl- effect, because store associates are on display for any passersby to see. As part of its nationwide remodeling program, the company installed bright interior and exterior lighting. 7-Eleven stores are brightly lit at night and store sales associates have a dear view of the parking lot. Store Security and Safety For more than half a century, 7-Eleven has been America's neighborhood grocery store, bringing convenience into the lives of millions. As part of its commitment to the communities it serves, the loyal customers who visit our stores and the employees working in the stores, the company has put in place one of the most comprehensive safety and security programs in the convenience store Industry. 7-Eleven developed and implemented its first robbery deterrence program in 1975 based on research Interviews with convicted robbers. This program has been continually updated as ongoing research has provided additional methods of combating crime and new trends and 12/11/2009 11:39 5169064999 GAZ REALTY INC PAGE 02/02 patterns of criminal activity have evolved. The three original components: store personnel training, visibility Into and out of the stores and effective cash control continue to form the foundation for the program. Additional measures, new strategies and innovative approaches supplement these fundamental Issues so that this current training program Is responsive to the ever changing nature of the 7-Eleven convenience store business. I!Iadll ;41i~~NN~7 ~liil4ii?Ci~c:il M,111!I!~ II9'81~y'liw~i. iµW ml, W1' Loitering ;cy Please review these important notes. Do not allow loitering. I IIRNI* a;l' a Loitering means hanging around the store - Inside or outside - without buying anything. Loitering Is a serious problem, If left unchecked, It can: k discourage customers from coming into your store lead to harassment and other problems create a bad image for the store. . can Contribute to robbery, theft, vandalism, graffiti, and property damage. Learn to recognize loitering: The best way Is to consider the customer's point of view. For example, It is not loitering if a customer stands outside the store eating a sandwich that was dust purchased. But if a person Is standing around and not buying anything, he or she may be loitering. Take action against loitering. You may need to: ~ Take action when you first observe a potential problem develop - do not wait until a group gets larger or violence occurs. Be sure you have a good view of the parking lot. See that "no loitering" and "parking limited to 15 minutes" signs are posted. Politely speak to the person loitering, but never leave the store. Call the police, if the person keeps loitering. (Never place yourself in an unsafe situation.) aErm 7-ELEVEN, INC. 115 Broadhollow Road, Suite 300, Melville, New York 11747 (631) 421-7844 phone (631) 547-6374 fax February 15, 2010 - - Mr. Martin Sidor, Chair Planning Board Town of Southold { P o box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Dear Chairman Sidor, At the request of the Southold town planning board regarding our proposed location at 9945 Main Rd in Mattituck, NY, 7-Eleven agrees to establish the following rules with our vendors regarding deliveries to the premises. 1) All deliveries will be made from Main Rd only. Delivery trucks will not be permitted to enter the premises via Factory Avenue. 2) Delivery schedule will be planned so that deliveries are made from east to west in the town of Southold so that the delivery trucks only make a right turn into the premises from Main Rd. Sincerely, 4L 54-7"~ f.. Andrew J. Shelhorse Senior Real Estate Representative 7-Eleven, Inc MO LETTER 'Tw PATRICIA C. MOORE,MORNEY AT LAW 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-4330 email: pcmoorel Coptonline.net C DATE To )r I il SU TJ v 1'` iJ N) N IN SIGNED " Please repy No reply necessary POLES ~I f}I Air 1 I •S~~ C11-If 7,J.IIFcN _ - lj' N.P1 J I- I 0", P4HO ill, V91 I& at zl iii > 10 (t N. 1 cV cighl cari br i tu aciu f > ),I i di I li-iip \ I i rn n 1 h P.d I ~ b \ 1 I I ~ 'x. h f. ems E o n . J i r Ih ai c' i urww fA iv i I Xr 1 Aln 1015101: +E' U'i ICi F301 ?5 _ J SCI. s:vy', 11,0 ...4cr:1s; Of' rjl Lin ,.._~a !bl--u. Evs! Roll Cott 1 L 17i_t?L1.. I I 7HO1 IZ""sl IIV 0ti$ :Ili LZ. p't'V 1ti.i .'d,W, 14Y 1111i '9 1(?i i. (U Ci),!X, :Y1V.a~ ~wr' )f>!9-. 10; tt-:.~.1^-Y',ati re, lit~?~i1if{oC~r!cc<,I~ E'~d S',!t^'i~ ui gi`~ieL~QiI.COti~ Area lighting MAGNiFt.ooi) ~I1~','1'120IPOC,17'AN-2 G li~;htiv~; orrr rra y } a 15a" ' 4-- I 1 Ire - .II !.vs PPI tA1:: w [:IJ11L IBS L M ~ J, I, (111 ~.I / p~~f I C it b 'Ill ~ C i I f~l i~'. I C0113I15I iWIN:I r AROM IZN7I r ncNd rodfo C IrmimWas 'y ihun nu Iwo rr sir/t1'.ho n-: n f~:h»..h l,. 2ndl .g-itl"Nq PWI~ M han(_;,C lrca443 OY.IJLIH1101 tl~lulnr ~f ,dart, -ncI d, t + ~ssc.' r. n r;..lr h J tray: l u~ ! h lb' , ° C I~ ~d hinge fl mn~ f. e.:/ r' n I, P.li f1 •L,m b&> 11sCIn IN 4^'J1pfl ru+'.n m I-'r!i"t " , ,et i lht L IhwAm lal on' ..n ,."On ~he(2)f "",furhght. aaI!'n ,11!~'.,r i„! fut ~I e. .:,'no v.1 ay Gll~r t ar_. . do n mj2ml_ h=b' A lyr: I.-M HL ufi;lL uk .,n .Bonit - 1 c I Yhum ,gpm on_A1 iirtu,,c nspie nI,:I Cirri f'l o; d~ I L l ronji c,,,o r Lm, w" dto) U _j I)I ;;t :ilfn v'rile :d-.rt1 • L.F.WT C OM II prim" e. Ti; v , u jpw V ii ,r -rdi " is A into t I hulU,I r a der Pnl~__. Pool. S_IMIMd h l c&; l O v, I, c I f r..: I I RI ~ i(l'ay C x rolo~, , ~ f 'I Fur.' I y CM. VD Des,. 11. L [ onl 1 '.it! Pr -°aw'e St„iEUrr CI. Olen in P, M-IS2-6u `ow I XM20, VVI1 VAX 1 • I SWO 7u'v 11C 'S/1;)0v S i I A Sit ale B Arr. ru S&100 1 Oft: [ PS/120v DBA [RAN P I A n'I [J.,Dxfmg M7S2-160 15On fL"EJiyOv 1- 1 u,.1`, ;vm,1y. WPII Walt Mou~.tiltG Ilire£al fli ldtte: WMSM VV- dl Moun.hil Bryd L&M ^,rm M7M12-70 70w MUM M-iM2-100 100'.v MI1/120v 720 Rari+hlolizr~rrti [avd. [do. Frr yolti.:, PdY 917Ct1 Tol: (639)226-1040 Fax: (011)22 -41141 VdsaasiiF, v.tiw.m ;Inifloorir Tito [-lrrall sale,~mrrr1ni31oo:.l.roln nw 7 ee, 64 Ceiling Lights Reces.edCF;lt.i!~( :t~TAS7'i?f{© .[~~~=t~l~~'~,O~~a Inc li~hlrir~ynur rr, ~z.. r, uw_~io, ' Ex:9nm, < Crur.a Up tu17 ,4. ' ~uvc I i, in , 4. r 20 Ft ° I i1f .4y. • COIN", I RIO iIC) Th Rik CMI U CfII.INr PLni)I It G ,ivy dutj i . N is (z.',i -I' 'hum 1?-It' thlr t „p. i a'arnl_ rI'll I>, ss'u'3 fl .;yn and a t vA U I '.d ndn 2 hL c :t elegy i u Jr,orfrarne_ n:: bolo. are is SWAI° slid Fimt. _s up to 175 " . t s.;-,1 yd w?, W 14 10wis q 04-B8" cr r,l IM I, SO - Is slp;. ad i:. 18 10 Komi 08-15MY c ng h0j. ur i U,nl nagw%tod. • Rt fl r 'I OR: S, a m e;liptix. PC ! hQ *D 1'111 rllcll%j St .[lo;,i120-vc,l, `,b,,''. t. ,LlyOf of =!.i,. Irr.ball 11x1)1^ li iY:routJl, r.il, it • I I?!: I0 0d g! , M a s o toy r c. i rf'win do I u'. ~er;x•: nl;ly. Door fiat i 1, fn!ly a 4. ,..:I to wsisf w.: tlarwid iusecl intruslot fu ins, II, , : rWd a +IIr,IY ,S. Fho optl vim 0110 11 In so- L uu CW doorframe n1a!dng It easy to relarnp. • f=IN!`41 SAM Y! 56h sl IS TO 1 I•.„ q11 w" iu M Ji 011 r c , ors a. i J,in f unl Wry o I U41 OitPJzk 1 .c; Iidr .'i3II'1t;, CS IJ:+; i'.I. F"AFCiP;tiS: Gat ke' U.:-:c±ipG o!` I Cf: r 1 a~o I a sure S0%;WIi;: D W K4 4 to i KK6FR-10 i( ING/1M M1- M ' v zg.t A_. r:wd; KKSFR-159 15D; 111'0120V PLY Poly AWAY Icon KKSf-if-2:i0 i -v' h'S/12UV 0 Ou- r f i llnlt F Fuse Anoddy WG W,rCuard M;aal Il:ai41;:: PS Pu!sr Sari KKRIFR-100 1000, fvY U1 %Ov KKMF41 QPS 17Sw `A: 120v KKMM-25C 'S 25C'ra M}Ili?Cv Ir ouclicn: KKIFRSb 55re C! Ind17 Jp-'lily (f'htiips) KKI(-R-8'i BSw 01 I11a%170-277v (Phi!Cs) 7290 New Hur4zoru. FM No. An ityvil;e, NY 11709 IM: (631)2261000 Fax: (639)226-41.44 W'.3>sis: Nix Ire=er~nif3aod.com 3-10 Wall Lights PAN' I L f O N-3 MAGNI~~ poi) Inc (t~hfin your u'r~y 6 5/8 rs a d a y~+etd n 10 3 4 l4 IT y+ d r ri ENO FL A-1 Ufa-'S: •CONSI£:ld IKV -Itc PAVJ ION;f f'L 413alloyc':IWmamn,h: p-Agwth 3MW mr_ruuwall, anda tact alo n I ! Iinc)eci c!"ur for eas' s M h r p urnl 1) t. -1 he luminmu A g k _ 1 and y ?'W: NT „ AN -Ask,-! -LENS: WS"Fliz<' IM MAW, 1 .,wk Ia.or3/1G clover terr !g • E d ECTRK A1_: Rxtun , mcs " I t o a, VO .j m.d;0 mmogul f I 4-Ind porca1ain.4 ka ,i,l rzI 'i 1, -.sl,_~.i 5.?:.D.L'I 1hJ 'nSlo rn nd ly'niLu r, E CMG ap.l c; 0" Ai,' iu. On a , 'JUo hay Ili Cn~p"Apo S fl Gin (W Ihi: lien dlru is Lll. l"Ind to moAvow W 1579 AN Ir;m u n erc p_ dud to hry len"I !-I id I or Uasicg fo V'3'! I u, III I..i y (OC ght s I nrry cm f is d., ) hart: anw O) • f Juno f l is l GI(, I Ll.. -g' Y I r y 6' ^jm do giccn, Kriri. f rtl;:cF. n (ia , o'O: on re.lu fora fnc'xy Ui 01110f, RIIn1Ca INF'Jr,'vlPllC1P.: Cl'IIJiv:rlr Ff Al c:'.h No: Do;ci~ptiorti L Imp Ni"di F'ressufc$oUl Wit: Tv:;1sllock CC3.SVJ-50 50r:'H;,",/120v Pho:,'! J,lc.Co'lIf"I CC3-SW-70 70w H! 16/120V PC bnnkn Cyr f'hutoc:o; trul CC3 W/ 100 100vi HP:;/120v M I 1 CC3-SW-150 150w 1f'S/120v SP RJ` i Son ;n(rY Me& Halide: sho NMI W'-l Wile On w; CC'S-MIA, -S0F'S 50~v N'IFI/120V GI lon1pn Il Gloos lens (',C,'3-MW-70PS 70,v Mh 11120v F Lu?e f1s~.e. nLrly CC3-MW 100PS 100w MI 111 20V CC3-MW-175PS 175w VIW120v Compact Fluorescent: CC3-PL: 26 2(jw PL-Flu-120v CC3-PL-32 32w PL.-Flu-120v CC3-PL-42 42w PL-Flu-120v Induction: CC3-F 55 55w 01 Ind/120-277v (I'hTp) 7200 New Horizons Blvd.. No.A.rnifyvlilr, NY 11701 TO: (631)226-1000 Fax: (6:'9)226-1441 w h eitc: w +nrlgnifiood.com s fA. ~A -rB STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 www.nysdot.gov SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. STANLEY GEE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ACTING COMMISSIONER December 8, 2009 Mr. Vincent Angelo Corrado, P.E. Associate Engineer w Qs Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. _ 60 Main Street - Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 r , Your August 13, 2009 Submission Proposed Convenience Store 9945 Main Road NY 25, Mattituck SCTM 1000-14200-0100-027000_,_____- Our Case No. 01-099P Dear Mr. Corrado: This is in regard to the information for the referenced project which was submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site work and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. The work zone traffic control is insufficient. At the least, intersection control should be shown as well as lane shifting in front of business. 2. On Sheet SP-1 ramp is not aligned with cross walk 3. Site plan sheets show a crosswalk going across the Route 25 exit/entrance. Please verify if this to be striped out. If so, please designate by item number. Two (2) parallel lines instead of ladder type should be sufficient. 4. Please callout the proposed ramps' "TYPE" for all sidewalk ramps. Add flares where needed. 5. Please install all proposed crosswalks as illustrated in the crosswalk detail sheet enclosed with marked up plans & comments. Mr. Vincent Angelo Corrado • • December 8, 2009 Page 2 of 3 6. The countdown timer shall be mounted underneath the pedestrian Hand/Man indicator. Depict this configuration within the Sequence Table. Also, show the pedestrian movements within the phasing diagrams. 7. Show the pedestrian movements in the sequence table's phasing diagrams. 8. A Microcomputer Signal Operations Specifications (MSOS) Table is required to show where the proposed cable will be wired in the cabinet. 9. Sheet 5 of 6, in Note #5, the 3 d line should read as follows, "...TURNED ON (INCLUDING FLASHING OPERATION) WITHOUT NYS TRAFFFIC SIGNAL PERSONNEL PRESENT..." 10. In Note #7, change the proposed sign from "R6-12C" to "R10-3E" from the National MUTCD. 11. The correct item number for Pedestrian Countdown Timers is 03680.8150, make appropriate changes to the callouts and estimate table. 12. The correct item number for Removal of Traffic Signal Equipment is 10680.79, make changes to the callouts and estimate table. 13. The N/S crosswalk needs to be evaluated due to its distance from its associated side street movement (NB). The signal may need to be re-phased to take this potential problem into account. 14. Do we now need a westbound to southbound arrow, especially in light of a fully protected eastbound to northbound arrow? 15. We recommend removing the entire existing sidewalk and reconstructing to current DOT Standards. Sidewalk shall be 5' wide and placed behind a minimum 36" wide turf utility strip. 16. There is an existing pedestrian signal button at the comer. Indicate where it will be relocated after construction. Modify sidewalk area to insure ADA compliant access to the button. 17. Why are the crosswalks hatched? 18. Reconstructing the entrance is going to require work in front of the neighboring property. We also suggest reconstructing the sidewalk here to create continuous compliance. If the ramp at the entrance to the shopping center is to remain, add notes indicating that any new construction shall meet flush and level. 19. Add all applicable details, notes and item numbers to proposed work in the State ROW. 20. We would like to require appropriate street tree planting in our ROW area as part of NYSDOT's initiative to increase tree planting statewide. The landscape plan submitted addresses only private property development requirements. Mr. Vincent Angelo Corrado • December 8, 2009 Page 3 of 3 21. We suggest planting four (4) DED resistant heritage elms - Ulmus americana `Valley Forge', `Princeton' or `New Harmony' at 40' on center for the long term enhancement of the highway corridor. Placement is to occur behind the new sidewalk, and approximately midway between the edge of concrete and the ROW line. 22. Please refer to the marked-up plans sheets for additional comments and corrections. Please submit eight (8) copies of revised plans for our review. In your response letter, please state how the above comments are addressed, item by item. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject Case Number and County Tax Map number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Ori^inal Signed By ShaiK A. Saad SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Zr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold r. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:ajf STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 www.nysdot.gov SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. STANLEY GEE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ACTING COMMISSIONER January 19, 2010 Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Your November 24, 2009 Letter 7-Eleven Convenience Store 9945 Main Road NY 25, Mattituck SCTM 1000-14200-0100-027000 Our Case No. 01-099P Dear Ms. Wisner: We are writing in response to your question concerning the practicality of prohibiting right hand turns on red from the Main Road (NY 25) heading north on Factory Avenue. This would be an appropriate mitigation at this intersection. Please have the applicant address this issue with the next submission of plans to us. Mr. Mark Wolfgang is coordinating review of the subject material. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject Case Number and County Tax Map number. Thank you for your interest in traffic safety. Very truly yours, A SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. - Civil Engineer III o Traffic Engineering and Safety Ms. Kristy Winser • January 19, 2010 Page 2 of 2 cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Mr. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:ajf • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS OF so~ryo South 1d,ox 1179 11971 MARTIN H. SIDOR ,`O l0 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS N oe Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON ..A (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND COU0,~ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE December 8, 2009 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Gama Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck, SCTM# 142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore; This letter serves to clarify the review process and steps necessary to move the site plan, referenced above, forward in the review process. Additionally, the Planning Board has identified several issues raised at the public hearing that it would like the applicant to address. To summarize the process thus far, our records indicate that the present site plan application for this property was submitted on March 6, 2009. However, the Planning Board did not receive all necessary information including a truck template, floor plan, lighting plan and an indication of loading areas drawn on the plan, required for the Board to commence review of the application until May 22, 2009. Once the requested information was submitted to this office, the Applicant's site plan application was formally accepted for review at the June 9, 2009 Planning Board work session and referred to the various Town Departments and involved/interested agencies for their comments and recommendations. On July 20, 2009 a Planning Board work session was held to discuss the details of the applicant's submissions, and comments and recommendations received from the comment period. During the work session, the Planning Board requested certain minor changes to correct inaccuracies on the site plan. For example, the floor plan and truck template submitted did not match the current building layout and site design. By letter dated July 22, 2009, Planning Staff memorialized the requests of the Planning Board as discussed at the July 20, 2009 work session including the minor site plan corrections, revised elevations in accordance with the ARC recommendations and signage details. That letter also acknowledged that the Planning Board's review of the application was incomplete and recommended that the Applicant wait for further comments prior to making revisions to the I overall site plan. The applicant was also advised that certain additional items not discussed at the July 20, 2009 work session were scheduled for discussion on the work session agenda for July 27, 2009. At the July 27, 2009 work session the Planning Board determined that additional information was needed to further the review, of the application and the applicant was advised to forgo changes to the site plan pending further review by the Planning Board. On July 28, 2009 the applicant submitted additional plans to address the comments of the Planning Board set forth in the July 22, 2009 letter and from the work session held on July 27, 2009. A follow-up letter dated July 29, 2009 was sent to the applicant to confirm the Planning Board's recommendations from the July 27, 2009 work session; i.e. that no further changes were requested by the Board at that time and that the Planning Board needed additional information to further the review the application and the applicant's submission of July 28, 2009. Thereafter, and on August 27, 2009 the applicant submitted additional information to address the information requested by the Planning Board in the July 22 and July 29 letters. This submission included retaining wall and grading details on the East side of the property which was forwarded to the Town Engineer by letter dated September 1, 2009 for review and comment. After receiving and reviewing comments from the Town Engineer, the Planning Board considered the application and the various submissions made by the applicant at its September 27, 2009 work session wherein the follow transpired: 1. The Planning Board accepted a revised floor plan included in the July 28, 2009 submission for review; 2. The Planning Board accepted truck template "SP4" submitted by the applicant on July 28, 2009 for review; 3. The Planning Board rejected the truck template "SPY" which was part of the July 28, 2009 submission as incomplete; 4. The Planning Board was unable to resolve certain site design elements and determined that to do so would require additional information; Planning Staff advised the applicant of the events of the September 27, 2009 work session in a letter dated September 28, 2009. The letter also advised the applicant that the Planning Board would request additional information and map changes following its consideration of the public comments from the public hearing that was scheduled and held on October 13, 2009. After receiving public comments on the proposal the applicant submitted a letter dated October 26, 2009 addressing public comments deemed relevant by the applicant. Subsequently the Planning Board placed this application on its work session agenda for November 23, 2009, 2 wherein the Planning Board reviewed all relevant public comments from the public hearing, the July 28, 2009 submission, the August 27, 2009 submission and the October 26, 2009 letter from the applicant regarding the public hearing. The Planning Board acknowledged that it had several concerns raised at the public hearing regarding traffic and traffic safety and various site design elements that still needed to be addressed by the applicant. As a result of the November 23, 2009 meeting, the Planning Board's review of the July 28, 2009 submission, the August 27, 2009 submission, the issues raised at the public hearing held on October 13, 2009 and the applicant's letter of October 26, 2009 the following information is being requested of the applicant before the Planning Board can give further consideration to this application: 1. Prepare and submit a Traffic impact analysis (prepared by a traffic engineer). a. The Planning Board has found that the limited traffic study submitted by the applicant in September, 2008, and the subsequent review of parking and building size of other 7-11's in the Town submitted with the revised application in 2009, were not adequate to address all the traffic issues and questions both from the Planning Board and raised at the public hearing. The traffic generation numbers provided by the applicant make it clear that the site will be used much more intensely than it is now. The intensification of use, and remaining questions regarding site circulation, ingress and egress, and impacts to Factory Avenue, together with the following concerns and questions raised at the public hearing are the rationale behind the request for a traffic impact analysis: Public Hearing issues related to traffic impacts i. Was truck traffic considered as part of the 2008 traffic study for the site, and if so, how did it relate to potential impacts to Factory Avenue? ii. Was the issue of prohibiting left turns exiting onto Factory Avenue reviewed and or considered in the 2008 traffic study? iii. Were the surrounding and nearby uses and potential conflicts considered as part of the 2008 traffic study - including the following: 1. Magic Fountain and cars that back out onto Factory Ave. 2. Boat trailers with large boats moving on and off Factory in a driveway almost directly across from the site's proposed driveway. 3. The Walbaums shopping center. 3 4. Truck delivery routes - trucks seem to be routed up to the North Road, and then down Old Sound Ave to get to Factory Ave business access. Why aren't they routed down Route 25? 5. Accident reports and expected accident rate given the larger number of cars exiting and entering near this intersection. b. The Traffic Impact Analysis should be based on current data, and should include the following elements: i. A review of the existing roadway conditions and traffic volumes in the vicinity of the site (the applicant may request the Traffic Impact Analysis for the J.P Morgan Chase Bank site plan which contains traffic counts from August, 2009, which the Planning Board would accept as adequate for reflecting current conditions); ii. Projections of the traffic volumes expected to be generated by the 7-11 (the applicant may use the ITE data for 24 hour convenience stores and the existing conditions previously submitted in 2008 - the Planning Board has found that provides an adequate estimate of before and after traffic generation for the site); iii. An analysis of existing and future roadway and site driveway operations that includes but is not limited to the following: 1. Levels of service for the intersections nearby 2. The expected Level of Service for the driveways, and describe whether the queue can be accommodated on-site, and whether queuing at the driveways will impede on-site circulation. 3. An analysis of conflicts with driveways across the street and nearby including: a. Stacking on Factory Avenue, and the potential for cars exiting the site to block the northbound lane of Factory Avenue b. Cars backing out of Magic Fountain c. Boats and boat trailers exiting and entering driveway across Factory Avenue from the site driveway. d. Truck stacking on Factory for Waldbaums 4 4. A review of the Site Plan focusing on the proposed site access, parking layout, and circulation patterns, including truck ingress and egress to the site and to and from Factory Avenue (truck templates submitted do not show the complete turning movement); iv. Describe the 7-11 delivery truck routes for the region and how this new 7- 11 will be served by delivery trucks - (e.g. will the trucks travel westbound on Rt. 25 and enter from there, or will they be eastbound and attempt to enter from Factory Avenue?); v. Accidents - identify the level of and current trend for accidents at the Factory Avenue and Route 25 intersection, and along Factory Avenue and Route 25 within 200' of the intersection, and identify any predicted or expected increase in accident rates as a result of the new 7-11 site; and vi. Recommendations and conclusions, including any mitigation for identified impacts and proposed solutions to identified site circulation problems. 2. Other revisions to the site plan. The following map changes have not been adequately addressed and are requested at this time to the best extent practical to meet the requirements of the Code. If it is not feasible to meet the following site plan requirements, submit in writing the reason why. Please keep in mind that requirements specified in the Town Code must be met or a variance requested from the Zoning Board of Appeals (these are identified with the Town Code section referenced). a. Landscaping i. Provide a plan that demonstrates 35% landscaping coverage of the subject property. Town Code Section 280-Bulk Schedule. 1. Demonstrate the 35% landscaping is entirely located within the subject property boundaries. ii. 25' front landscaped area is required and not met. Town Code Section 280-93. iii. Northeast landscape buffer does not meet code requirement of a minimum of four feet. Town Code Section 280-95. b. Parking and parking lot design i. 27 parking spaces required. I 5 I ii. Aisles - northeast back up aisle 20' wide, 22' required by code. Provide parking lot aisles that meet the town code. iii. Size of parking spaces must meet the town code - indicate parking space dimensions on plan. Min size is 9' x19'. iv. Provide safe pedestrian access to the building from the Factory Avenue and Rt. 25 sidewalks (see CVS and Hudson City site plans for examples). e. Lighting Plan i. Redesign lighting of the site to light the areas where people will walk. Lighting landscaped areas above 1 footcandle (fc) should be avoided. Illumination levels at the property line shall range between 0.0 fc to 1.0 fc. ii. Revise with light poles that meet the town code height requirement. iii. Show the photometric grid extending to just beyond the property line. iv. Use lighting fixtures that does not throw intense light on to areas that do not need to be lighted, puts more light in areas that do need to be lighted (where pedestrians walk). v. Submit cut sheets for any lighting fixtures that have been changed including the on-building lighting fixtures and the sign lighting fixtures. d. Signs i. Submit plans for all signs. ii. No signs maybe internally lit. Town Code Section 280-87 e. Other approvals and review: i i. NYS DOT - outstanding issues that could affect the site design remain and must be resolved during in the Planning Board's review. ii. SC Health Department - outstanding issues that will affect the site design remain and must be resolved during the Planning Board's review. Obtain written documentation from the Suffolk County Health Department on the need for any additions to the septic system and ensure that all site plans are consistent with these requirements. It appears that the area identified as "natural buffer" might need to be altered, and then landscaped as a result j of changes to the septic system. The site plan must accurately reflect the condition of the site as a result of septic system changes required by the Health Department. 6 I~ ~ i f. Aerial view. Overlay the site plan on an aerial photo (an aerial that is recent enough to reflect current conditions if possible) to aid in analysis of interactions with adjacent sites and the intersection. Public Hearing Issues The following are issues and concerns raised at the public hearing that the Planning Board is requesting the applicant answer. Please provide a summary of the following information for consideration: 1. "Green Building" or LEEDS. Will the proposed be developed under green building practice? 2. How will loitering concerns on site be controlled? 3. Will there be sidewalks or pedestrian access being proposed as part of the development of the site? 4. The many issues related to traffic were listed previously in this letter and should be addressed in the traffic impact analysis requested. I trust that this provides the information sought to process this application further. Should you have any question or need clarification on the above matter, please contact the office to schedule a meeting. Upon completion of the revised site plan and its review, the matter will be j scheduled for the Board's determination. Sincerely, Martin H. Sidor, Chair, Planning Board cc: Planning Board Town Attorneys Office Heather Lanza, Planning Director Kristy Winser, Senior Planner 7 II MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Of SO(/r~o P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS H a~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~O 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND yco Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 24, 2009 New York State Department of Transportation 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Attention: Mr. Mark Wolfgang Re: Site Plan for Seven Eleven. Mattituck - Case No. 01-099P Located: n/e Corner of Factory Avenue & Main Road SCTM 1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: Business Dear Mr. Wolfgang: The above referenced site plan was discussed at a Planning Board work session on November 23, 2009 where it was suggested to have no right hand turns on red from the Main Road heading north on Factory Avenue. The Planning Board would like to know if this option is practical and has been considered for this intersection? Any additional information you may want to provide is always appreciated. As always thank you for your time and consideration. If there are any questions you can contact me at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, Kristy Winser Senior Planner Cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, November 23, 2009 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Applications Project name: loannou, Constantine _ SCTM#: 1-14.7,23-2-5.6. Location: on the north side of SR 25, 4848 east of Kayleigh's Court in East Marion Description: Standard subdivision. 3 lots on 6.8 acres. Lot 1 equals 92,332 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 114,288 sq. ft., and Lot 3 equals 80,000 sq. ft. in the R-80 Zoning District. _ Status: Expired Cond. Prelim. Approval Action: Review Trustee/Planning site visit and Trustee recommendations. Attachments: Report on Site Visit/E-mail from Trustees Project name: Zuckerber , Lloyd P. SCTM#: 1000-86-1-10.9 Location: Southwest corner of Wells Road and State Route 25 in Peconic Description: 80/60 clustered Conservation subdivision on 32.83 acres. Lot 1 equals 65,562 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 77,694 sq. ft., and Lot 3 equals 29.5416 acres and is proposed to be preserved through a Sale of Development Rights to the Town of Southold. Status: Sketch Approval Action: Review Town Engineer comments on proposed drainage. Attachments: Town Engineer Comments Project name: Mazzaferro, Karen SCTM#: 1000 63-1-12 Location: on the east side of Horton's Lane, 1450 Horton's Lane, Southold Description: Standard subdivision to subdivide a 4.28-acre parcel into 3 lots, where Lot 1 equals 41,994 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 43,631 sq. ft., and Lot 3 equals 90,023 s ft in the R-40 Zoning District. Status: Sketch Approval Action: Accept Preliminary lication/Be in referrals and SEQRA. Attachments: Timeline/Staff Report Project name: Seven Eleven SCTM# 11000-142-1-27 Location: We corner of Facto Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck Description: Site plan to convert an existing 1,985 sq. ft. gas station/accessory convenience store to a convenience store with a 685 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,670 sq. ft. building on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone. _ Status: New Site Plan Action: Review comments from the Public Hearing and Staff Report with the Planning Board. _ Attachments: Staff Report Packet Discussion: Draft ZBA Comments - Theodore Martz, Nassau Point 2010 Planning Board Meeting Schedule PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries November 19, 2009 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Art: Kristy Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Kristy: For your file enclosed is a revised print showing 27 parking spaces which conforms to the revised parking schedule, we would suggest that some of these spaces either be eliminated ( as previously recommended) or landbanked, built out only if the need develops, on the final site plan. My client, the architect and I will attend the Monday work session. V q ttu y urs, atricia C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. i 1115 J +v A. rzn+tY~' J~9° ~ iVIATTITUCK FIRE DISTRIA 1 ~6 PO BOX 666, PIKE STREET MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952-0666 Commissioners David F. Haas, Chairman John C. Harrison, Secretary Barbara Dickerson, Treasurer Norman A. Reilly, Jr., Sr., Vice Chairman Martin L. Gd fln Lloyd H. Relsenberg William G. Young November 11, 2009 i Southold Town Planning Board Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner P O Box 1179 i Southold, NY 11971 Re: SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 (Second Request) Dear Ms. Winser, The Board of Fire Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District reviewed your request dated November 10, 2009 at their regular meeting; after their review of your request it was determined they had "no further comment" than was stated in their initial response of June 26, 2009 (attached). Sincerely,' J .Harrison Secretary/Fire District Manager cc: Board of Fire Commissioners Chief Office (631) 298-8837 Facsimile (631) 298-8841 OMATTITUCK FIRE DISTRIP PO BOX 666, PIKE STREET MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952-0666 Commissioners David F. Haas, Chairman John C. Harrison, Secretary Barbara Dickerson, Treasurer Norman A. Reilly, Jr., Sr., Vice Chairman Martin L Griffin Loyd H. Relsenberg William G. Young June 26, 2009 Southold Town Planning Board Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner P O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Seven Eleven NYS Rte 25, Mattituck, NY SCTM#: 1000-142-1-27 Dear Ms. Winser, The Board of Fire Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District reviewed the above mentioned site plan and make no additional recommendations other than that all drives be cleared and maintained to meet Southold .Town Code. If you require any additional information please do not hesitate to, contact me. Sincerely, John C. Harrison Secretary/Fire District Manager cc: Board of Fire Commissioners Chief COPY Office (631) 298-8837 Facsimile (631) 298-8841 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Qf SOU~yo P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~Q Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y ~Nc Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ,O 54375 tate Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND OWN, Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765.3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 10, 2009 ~-e~ir e~ /raro~ mFT? Mr. John Harrison L'~~ 7 • C~Q c/o Mattituck Fire District 111010 P.O. Box 666 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Request for Review on Site Plan for Seven Eleven, Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Harrison: The enclosed site plan application, referenced above, was subject of a Planning Board Public hearing held October 13, 2009 where traffic circulation and safety concerns were raised. The site plan and related truck templates for the proposed development are being referred to you for your review. Please respond with your recommendations at your earliest convenience. Proposed action: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 658 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635sq.ft. building on a 24,829 sq.ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the n/e comer of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Kristy Winser Senior Planner enc. site plan • • *a© Site Plan Review: Seven Eleven Staff report on remaining issues, revisions, and requested information. The following are issues that remain outstanding from Planning Board review, and also issues raised at the public hearing that must be resolved. A. Traffic a. A comparison of Traffic Counts of existing conditions versus the proposed use was provided in original application in 2008, but not resubmitted with revised application in 2009. i. See "Traffic Study Analysis and Review" attached. b. Issues that must be addressed and reviewed i. Analysis of site ingress & egress given the intensification of traffic at the site by three-fold. fl. Analysis of conflicts with the adjacent driveways and parking areas. 1. Stacking at the light blocking left turns and potentially blocking southbound factory avenue. 2. Truck ability to turn into the site and circulate safely. iii. Truck routing in the region. Assign a truck route? iv. Accidents - will they increase as a result of the marked increase in cars pulling in and out near the intersection? v. Truck template and feasibility of large truck ingress & egress. Large tractor trailers have been noted regularly unloading at the other 7-1 Vs. vi. Transportation Commission review of any future traffic report vii. Corner radius dedication and improvement to be done by applicant (with DOT contributing by bearing the cost of moving utilitieslped. Signal). This will provide some mitigation to the operation and safety of that corner, but will not mitigate all effects, especially to Factory Avenue. B. Landscaping a. Provide a plan that demonstrates 35% landscaping coverage of the subject property. Town Code Section 280-Bulk Schedule L Demonstrate the 35% landscaping is entirely located within the subject property boundaries. b. 25' front landscaped area is required and not met. Town Code Section 280-93. c. NE landscape buffer does not meet code requirement of a minimum of four feet. Town Code Section 280-95. d. Unclear on the issue of septic system and whether vegetated area as shown on the plan will be altered or removed as a result of health department requirements. Obtain written documentation from the Suffolk County Health Department on the need for any additions to the • • ~b septic system and ensure that all site plans are consistent with these requirements. C. Parking and parking lot design a. 27 parking spaces required. 24 proposed b. Aisles - northeast back up aisle 20' wide, 22' required by code. Provide parking lot aisles that meet the town code. c. Size of parking spaces must meet the town code - indicate parking space dimensions on plan. Min size is 9x19. d. Provide safe pedestrian access to the building from the Factory Avenue and Rt. 25 sidewalks. e. Do not show parking stalls where cross-access is proposed. D. Lighting Plan a. Revise with light poles that meet the town code height requirement. b. Show the photometric grid extending to just beyond the property line c. Choose a lighting fixture that does not throw intense light to areas that do not need to be lighted - see marked-up plan and notes for reference. d. Submit cut sheets for all lighting fixtures including the on-building lighting fixtures and the sign lighting fixtures. e. Redesign lighting of the site to light the areas where people will walk. Lighting landscaped areas above 1 footcandle (fc) should be avoided. Illumination levels at the property line shall range between 0.0 fc to 1.0 fc. E. Signs a. Submit plans for all signs. b. No signs may be internally lit. Town Code Section 280-87 c. Ground sign height Town Code Section 280-85 F. Other approvals and review a. NYS DOT - outstanding issues that could affect the site design remain and must be resolved during in the Planning Board's review. b. SC Health Department - outstanding issues that will affect the site design remain and must be resolved in the Planning Board's review. G. Additional helpful information a. Overlay the site plan on the aerial photo (an aerial that is recent enough to reflect current conditions if possible) to aid in analysis of interactions with adjacent sites and the intersection. 0 • Summary of issues and questions from the public hearing for 7-11 1. Traffic and traffic safety a. Was the traffic study done in 2008 for the car wash sufficient to adequately address the proposed 7-11? b. Was truck traffic considered as part of the 2008 traffic study for the site and if so, how did it relate to potential impacts to Factory Avenue? c. Was the Traffic Study done prior to a traffic light? d. Was the issue of prohibiting left turns exiting onto Factory Ave. reviewed? i. Concern about cars blocking northbound Factory Ave. lane when cars are stacked at red light, and there isn't room to exit fully from the site to the southbound lane. e. Were the surrounding and nearby uses considered as part of the traffic studies? i. Magic Fountain and cars that back out onto Factory Ave. ii. Boat trailers with large boats moving on and off Factory in a driveway almost directly across from the site's proposed driveway. f. Truck delivery routes - trucks seem to be routed up to the North Road, and then down Soundview to get to Factory Ave business access. Why aren't they routed down Route 25? g. Cross access is necessary to reduce the impact of the 7-11 on the Factory Ave/Rt. 25 intersection. h. Accident reports and expected accident rate given the larger number of cars exiting and entering near this intersection. 2. "Green Building" or LEEDS. Will the proposed be developed under green building practice? 3. How will loitering concerns on site be controlled? 4. Will there be sidewalks or pedestrian access being proposed as part of the development of the site? 5. Several issues raised were unrelated to this site plan review. a. The boat place on the s/w corner (Sigsbee and Rt. 25) - "No parking" signs were removed. b. Trim the trees south of the CVS site on Sigsbee to increase visibility. • • ~d c. Cottages- no sidewalks connecting the cottages to the hamlet were installed as part of the development project. d. Enforcement- people make illegal left turns out of Walbaums shopping center onto Route 25. Applicant addressed some issues from the public hearing in a letter dated 10/26/09 from Pat Moore, but not all, and the ones addressed weren't necessarily addressed adequately. • Items addressed in applicant letter dated 10/26/09 o Traffic flow will be improved by improving corner radius and moving access driveways. o Applicant supports no parking on Factory Ave. o Traffic studies - letter states the PB reviewed the car wash traffic study for this parcel and that should be enough (also mentions CVS traffic study and Cottages traffic review). o Claims to be reducing the intensity of the present use based on the removal of the gas station and accessory convenience store to a only a convenience store. o Dismisses the rest of the public input. • • t, Timeline for 7-11 (Gaeta Properties) 9/5/08 Notice of Disapproval rec'd in Planning 9/8/08 Applicant withdraws "car wash" application and submits 7-11 application in a joint letter to ZBA and Planning Board 9/9/08 Receipt on Planning of 7-11 site plan application 9/17/08 ZBA request for comments rec'd in Planning (length of building and side yard variance) 9/19/08 Planning Dept letter to applicant's agent Pat Moore - a. Application incomplete - fee missing from previous application's SEQR review, missing site plan requirements, no pre-submission conference. 10/6/08 Planning Dept. letter to applicant Vivian Kamath - request pmt of SEQR fee from revious a lication 10/7/08 Applicant letter to Planning (Pat Moore). - asking PB to review the preliminary site plan, and at the same time saying they are beginning revisions according to 9/19 letter. 10/14/08 PB work session - review ZBA request for comments 10/17/08 Applicant letter to Planning (Pat Moore) - submittal of a site plan that includes landscaping and traffic circulation. The letter makes assertions about site conditions and mentions that the Planning Board required some landscaping on the northwest corner - is that from the old site plan? 10/20/08 PB work session - Review draft ZBA comments 10/21/08 PB comments to the ZBA 10/23/08 Pre-submission meeting with Pat Moore and applicant 10/24/08 Planning Dept. letter to applicant - Follow-up from pre-submission. To make application complete submit the following: 1. Submit application fee 2. SEQR fee from previous application 3. Lighting plan 4. Proposed signage Additional comments and review will follow the acceptance and review of a complete application. 10/29/08 SEQR fee issue from previous application ironed out (e-mail note on the subject) 10/31/08 Applicant letter to Planning (Pat Moore) - 1. Submit revised plans according to 10/24 Planning Dept. letter and fee. 11/3/08 PB work session. Recommend to accept the application and refer out. 11/5/08 Staff scoping, including the required Planning/Building Dept. meeting to review new site plan applications. 11/5/08 Planning Dept. letter to applicant. - PB has accepted the application for review. 11/5/08 Site plan application referred out to interested and jurisdictional agencies 11/11/08 Mattituck Fire Department - recommends that all accesses have the proper width to allow the entrance of fire and rescue apparatus (no mention is made of whether the plans were reviewed by them and whether the plans as shown, do provide adequate access so we don't know if the plans have the roper width.) 0 • YT t 12/1/08 Transportation Commission. 11/25/08 memo 1. redesign corner radius of Rt. 25 and Factory Ave to improve radius 2. No parking on Rt. 25 or Factory Ave adjacent to property 3. Landscaping costs be born by the applicant as previously agreed (meaning the previous application for a car wash) 4. Keep in mind the Scenic Corridor and require appropriate design and plantings. 12/1/08 NYS DOT comments. Extensive comments on drainage, signage and other issues the applicant must address. 12/4/08 Plannin Dept. referral to LWRP Coordinator 12/9/08 SC Planning Commission response. - Local determination. 12/23/08 Applicant letter to NYS DOT (Pat Moore) objecting to DOT suggesting applicant pay for the improvements to the Factory Ave/Rt. 25 turning radius in addition to dedicating the land. "unconstitutional" and "litigation" mentioned. 12/31/08 NYS DOT letter to applicant. 1. Request Traffic Impact Study to support claim that the proposed project would lessen the impact to SR25. 2. Provide truck circulation and tracking pattern on site. 3. Truck routing to and from the site 4. Also show truck tracking for westbound turn onto Factory Avenue (improvements to that turning radius may be required to accommodate that movement). 1/2/09 PB memo to ZBA - This is a Type II action, and no further review under SEQR required. 1/22/09 ZBA denied the variances. ZBA file # 6219 2/4/09 ZBA decision on variances received in Planning 2/10/09 Planning Dept. letter to applicant. Revise application showing a building that meets the code. Revised Notice of Disapproval needed. 2/11/09 NYSDOT & Planning & Applicant meeting. • Discussed the basis of the applicant's claim that the problems at the intersection of Factory Ave and Rt. 25 westbound are not related to the subject property, and their proposed project would improve the situation there. • DOT in a previous letter to them (12/31/08), and again at the meeting, stated that a Traffic Impact Study would be needed to prove that those claims are true. • At the meeting, the DOT stated that if the applicant simply agreed to make the changes to improve the corner to the DOT's satisfaction, they wouldn't need a Traffic Impact Study to prove that the proposed project would not worsen the situation at that comer. • The Town and DOT agreed that the corner radius needed to be improved. • The applicant complained about the cost, and agreed to submit estimates of required improvements to fix the corner to the DOT to prove their point that the cost was too hi and unreasonable. 2 • At the meeting, the DOT also asked for a truck template to help determine whether the dedication of land was necessary to make the improvement to the radius at that corner. 3/6/09 Applicant letter to PB (Pat Moore) Submit revised site plan application (7 copies) and revised Notice of Disapproval 3/16/09 PB work session. PB review revised plans 3/16/09 Planning Staff report 3/24/09 Planning Dept. letter to applicant - follow up to work session 1. submit revised forms to match revised plans submitted 2. Submit a floor plan 3. Submit a truck template for on and off site circulation of trucks 4. Lighting plans 5. Show loading area on site plan 6. Provide information that compares the existing traffic patterns to that of the proposed use. 7. Review will continue after the above are submitted. 3/25/09 NYS DOT letter to applicant (with applicant's estimate of work to improve radius) 1.The mitigation is warranted and will still be required despite the cost. 2. DOT agreed to pay part of the cost of improving the corner radius (the relocation of the pedestrian traffic control and utilities). 3. Submit the requested information from the previous letters on this application. 4/6/09 Applicant letter to Planning (Pat Moore). Submittal in response to 3/24/09 letter. Truck loading shown on separate plan that didn't match the site plan Lighting plan coming later. Explanation about why truck template not sent 4/7/09 Application Received 4/7/09 Traffic Comparison discussion b Pat Moore 4/16/09 Applicant letter to Planning (Pat Moore) Revised plans submitted that show the truck loading area and new parking configuration. 5/12/09 Planning Dept. letter to applicant. We need the truck template and detail of corner radius a lication not complete until it is received. 5/21/09 Applicant letter to Planning (Pat Moore) • Submitted truck template and corner radius design • Discussion on size and frequency of delivery trucks • Comparison to gasoline delivery trucks size • Claims about the benefits to the community of the project o Reduces # of uses on site o Improve offsite nonconforming parking and traffic issues 6/8/09 PB work session Review revised plans 6/9/09 Planning Dept. letter to applicant 3 Plans accepted for review and referral 6/11/09 Referrals made b planning 6/16/09 NYSDOT e-mail - no response yet to their letter of 3/25/09 to the applicant re uestin revised plans. 7/1/09 Transportation Commission - reaffirms its approval of the site as proposed. 7/9/09 SC Planning - local jurisdiction 7/17/09 Town Engineer. Jamie Richter's e-mail appears to approve the site plan, relying on an earlier review he had done for the car wash application and noting that the comments he made on that site plan were incorporated into the new site proposal. He may not have been aware of the potential drainage problems pointed out on earlier plans by the DOT in their first letter reviewing the site plan. Were those issues addressed by the applicant? 7/18/09 ARC recommendations (applicant agreed and PB a eed) 7/20/09 PB work session 7/20/09 Planning staff report 7/20/09 LWRP consistency review 7/21/09 Applicant letter to Planning. Pat's version of the work session 7/22/09 Planning Dept. letter to applicant. Planning Board's requirements from work session Submit 8 copies of the following for review 1. floor plan of current building design 2. Truck template matching proposed site plan Truck template above also showing internal circulation and ingress and egress 3. revised elevations in accordance with ARC recommendations 4. Signage detail 5. Following items - you may want to wait to revise plans before following through on the following items the Planning Board will require: o Revise parking area as described o Revise light poles to a height allowed by code 6. Following items to be addressed at next work session o LWRP review 0 25' front landscape requirement o parking on the east and west sides o lighting plan o location of grease trap, if required, and sanitary system and access to both and landscaping in that area. 7/28/09 Applicant letter to Planning Revised plans submitted from letter of 7/22/09. Asked PB to waive landscaping requirements Made some of the changes where Planning advised waiting to revise further. 7/27/09 PB work session 7/29/09 Planning Dept. letter to applicant. 4 No revisions to site plan requested at this time, but additional materials requested for clarification and review 1. Grading plan showing how site will accommodate proposed parking, existing retaining wall, etc. 2. Provide Health Dept. documentation pertaining to use of existing and/or proposed sanitary system a. Also provide details on access to the sanitary system ( for maintenance, installation, and landscaping.) 3. Clarify % of landscaping onsite. 8/3/09 Planning Dept. letter to applicant Confirming T e II under SEQRA 8/19/09 Applicant letter to Planning Confirm revised plans submitted to NYS DOT 8/21/09 Applicant letter to Plannning Confirm that an application was made to SC Heath 8/27/09 Applicant letter to Planning Submitted detail on new guardrail, additional retaining wall No details answering the 7/29/09 letter on Health Department and landscaping in that area - states they are waiting to hear from DOT. States 31.64% landscape coverage that includes the natural buffer area. Plan still not clear on whether it includes any areas outside the boundary of the parcel. States that this plan incorporates all the revisions of the site plan previously re nested in the Jul 22, 2009 letter 9/1/09 Planning Dept. refer plans with guardrail/retaining wall to Office of Town Engineer for review 9/11/09 Town Engineer letter to Planning Issues identified with Truck Route Plan and some notes on a few things 9/24/09 Planning Board letter to applicant. Public hearing date set for 10/13/09 9/28/09 PB work session 9/28/09 Staff report Still outstanding issues. 9/28/09 Planning Dept. letter to applicant PB accepted the engineer's comments from 9/11/09,the floor plan and SP4, but not SP5. There will be further revisions requested to the plan and further requests for information, but not until after the public hearing on October 14. 10/13/09 Public hearing. Kept open for two weeks following to accept written comments for the record. 10/13/09 Letter from John Condon submitted at public hearing. Issues: Site suggest ons on site circulation and ingress and egress 10/14/09 Planning Board letter to applicant. Public hearing held open for two weeks 5 10/27/09 Applicant letter to Planning. `l Review of issues from Public Hearin 11/9/09 PB accepted the minutes including 7-11 public hearing. Planning Board public meeting 11/10/09 Re-referred out to Fire District based on public hearing issues raised about safety of the site and intersection. 11/11/09 Mattituck Fire District had nothin further to add. 6 Traffic Study Analysis and Review 1. 2004. For CVS development. i. Considered subject parcel as a gas station/convenience store. ii. Recommendation to improve both northbound and southbound Factory Ave lanes and add a left turn lane at the intersection southbound on Factory Ave. 2. 2006. For the Cottages. i. The intersection at Factory Avenue and Rt. 25 was considered. ii. Stated that the intersection will continue to operate at a very good level of service with no traffic impacts created, therefore no mitigation measures were required 3. 2007. For this site. Car Wash. Dunn Engineering i. Considered left and right turn ingress/egress onto Factory avenue ii. Recommended: additional traffic generated from the site can be adequately accommodated by existing roadway network, single driveway to main road and two on Factory will operate in a safe and efficient matter, applicant willing to enter into a cross access and applicant agrees to dedication of property to improve the corner radius. iii. Planning Board required more information about traffic and interactions with adjacent sites and was not satisfied that traffic impacts would not cause adverse impacts to the immediate vicinity. iv. DOT, Engineer, Transportation Commission comments included ¦ Access management, recommend a cross access, if not possible should be shown for future development. ¦ DOT recommended corner radius improvement and dedication ¦ No left turns into the driveway eastbound on the Main Road ¦ Right turn only ingress from Main road. 4. 2008 Traffic Study provided as part of the proposed 7-11 i. Cites the existing traffic generation from the 2007 Dunn Engineering traffic study. ii. Cites the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) data for "Convenience Market Open 24 Hours" for traffic generation. iii. Proposed use will triple the existing number of cars entering and exiting at the AM peak hour. iv. Conclusion: "The proposed 7-11 should not adversely effect the traffic in the surrounding area." v. Staff review: The above conclusion is based solely on traffic counts and how they related to roadway capacity. There is no discussion about the proximity of the site to a difficult intersection, the potential conflicts with adjacent sites, ingress and egress, or take into account turning movements and truck routing and access. Additionally, the study provided examines roadway capacity for e/w on the Main road and n/s on Factory. Since as proposed you can not make a left out of the site onto the Main Road heading east, traffic would have to exit onto Factory first. Therefore, this should have been included as part of the added capacity onto Factory ave (ex. instead of 3 proposed trip they should have included the trips heading east on the main road 29 for a total of 32 trips per hour during am peak hours). In 2008, during the review of the previous application on this site, the Planning Board acknowledged that the conditions at the site warranted further investigation of these points, and also that while the improvement of the turning radius would help mitigate the intensification of the use of this site, it would not necessarily be able to mitigate all the adverse effects. The previous application on this site, for a car wash, actually showed a less intense use than the proposed, based on traffic generation as per the 2008 report (3x higher). Summary of NPV report Positive Declaration for Warex Project: • Potential traffic generation, flow, and safety impacts to Factory Ave and the intersection due to access and vehicle movements from conven/gas use and proximity to surrounding uses. 2 • Pedestrian movements and Safety due to congestion and reported accidents should be examined. o Communication with the PD indicates that there were 61 reported accidents in the past 5 years. • Concern of intensification of use with various levels of vehicle movements caused by conditions and uses in proximity of subject site. • Truck stacking associated with the shopping center along Factory Ave. Although, studies have assumed that the use (convenience store) would not adversely impact to the roadway capacity it will add to more trips entering and exiting the site per hour and increase potential impact to Factory Ave. o Vehicle/truck movements with in the site itself need to be reviewed carefully, o Internal movement: having approx 30% more trips per hour entering exiting the site. o Added capacity onto Factory due to layout of access. o Although, studies have indicated that a convenience store will not generate "new" traffic being that the use is reviewed as passerby traffic for cats already on the roadway, it doesn't account for the cars heading east that need to enter and exit onto Factory Ave. o Stacking @ the light and in the site to exit. At the public hearing in October, 2009, members of the public brought several issues to the Planning Board's attention, including testimony from an engineer who lives nearby and is very familiar with the area. The unresolved issues brought up by the public, together with the intensification of the traffic at the site warrants a broader investigation of the impacts to this area of traffic from this site. 3 Additional Information for Ouestions Ble and C11 There is currently a gasoline service station and convenience store operating on the site. Based on the traffic data contained in Dunn Engineering Associates, P. C.'s November 2, 2007 traffic study, the operations conducted at the site currently generate the vehicle trips contained in Table 1 - Existing Trip Generation for both the weekday AM peak hour of 7:00 to 9:00 AM and the weekday PM peak hour of 4:00 to 6:00 PM. Table 1 - Existine Trio Generation SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC DEVELOPEMNT WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 7:00 TO 8:00 AM 4:00 TO 5:00 AM ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT EXISTING GAS 28 30 38 34 STATION As can be determined from the data contained in Table 1 above, the existing site operations generate a total of 58 trips per hour during the AM peak hour of 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 72 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. It is anticipated that the conversion of the gasoline service station and convenience store to a 7-Eleven convenience store will generate additional trips during both the AM and PM peak hours due to the increase in the size of the convenience store by the removal of the services bays and the expansion of the existing building. The additional trips generated by the proposed conversion can be determined utilizing the standard calculations complied by the Institute of Transportation Engineers contained in its 7`h Edition of Trip Generation 2003. The trip generation for the proposed action is contained in Table 2 - Proposed Trip Generation and was determined by using Land Use 851: "Convenience Market Open 24 Hours" for the proposed 2,700 square foot 7-Eleven. Table 2 - Proposed Trio Generation ITE CALCULATED GENERATED TRAFFIC DEVELOPEMNT WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 7:00 TO 8:00 AM 4:00 TO 5:00 AM ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT 7-Eleven 91 91 75 69 I As can be determined from the data contained in Table 2 above, the proposed 7- Eleven will generate a total of 182 trips per hour during the AM peak hour of 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 144 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. Therefore, the proposed 7-Eleven will generate 124 additional trips per hour during the AM peak hour of 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 72 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. However, it should be noted that based on pervious studies, convenience stores normally serve motorists that are passing by on their way to their primary destination. Therefore, the 7-Eleven should not generate a significant number of new trips because the majority of the costumer base is already on the adjacent roadway network. In order to determine the affect of the additional traffic on the capacity of the surrounding roadways, we have assumed that 50% of the additional trips generated by the proposed 7-eleven will be new trips and not pass through trips. Based on this assumption, the proposed 7-Eleven will generate 62 additional trips per hour during the AM peak hour of 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 36 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. In addition, based on the data contained in the above-mentioned Dunn Engineering Associates, P. C.'s report, 51 % of the traffic on Main Road proceeds in the westbound direction, 43% of the traffic on Main Road proceeds in the eastbound direction, 2% of the traffic on Factory Avenue proceeds in the northbound direction, and 4% of the traffic on Factory Avenue proceeds in the southbound direction during the AM peak hour. Based on these figures, we have developed the roadway capacity analysis contained in Table 3 - Roadway Capacity Analysis AM Peak Hours. Table 3 - Roadway Capacity Analysis AM Peak Hours. DIRECTION EXSITING PROPOSED TOTAL TRIPS CAPACITY TRIPS TRIPS MAIN ROAD 843 32 875 872 WB MAIN ROAD 716 29 745 1174 EB FACTORY 39 2 41 158 AVENUE NB FACTORY 64 3 67 188 AVENUE SB Further, based on the analysis present above, we calculated the roadway capacity for the 36 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. Once again, based on the data contained in the above-mentioned Dunn Engineering Associates, P. C.'s report, 41 % of the traffic on Main Road proceeds in the westbound direction, 49% of the 2 traffic on Main Road proceeds in the eastbound direction, 3% of the traffic on Factory Avenue proceeds in the northbound direction, and 7% of the traffic on Factory Avenue proceeds in the southbound direction during the PM peak hour. Based on these figures, we have developed the roadway capacity analysis contained in Table 4 - Roadway Capacity Analysis PM Peak Hours. Table 4 - Roadwav Capacity Analysis PM Peak Hours DIRECTION EXSITING PROPOSED TOTAL TRIPS CAPACILITY TRIPS TRIPS MAIN ROAD 898 15 913 895 WB MAIN ROAD 1059 18 1077 1153 EB FACTORY 63 1 62 158 AVENUE NB FACTORY 154 2 156 204 AVENUE S13 Therefore, based upon our review of the data contained in Tables 3 and 4 above, the additional traffic generated by the proposed 7-Eleven has an affect on the capacity of Main Road in the westbound direction during both the AM and PM peak hours. The westbound lanes of Main Road are at capacity during the AM peak hours and at 1.02% of capacity during the PM peak hours. However, we do not believe that the proposed 7- Eleven will adversely affect the capacity of Main Road because the data contained in Tables 3 and 4 did not account for turning movements within the intersection, which should reduce the traffic on Main Road to below its capacity. In addition, in all probability, the amount of pass through traffic will higher then the 50% factor assigned in the above analysis, which will further reduce the added trips along Main Road. Therefore, the proposed 7-Eleven should not be adversely effect the traffic in the surrounding area. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQRA POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement Determination of SigniScance Lead Agency: Town of Southold Planning Board Contact., Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chair V. Address: Town Hall Annex FEB 2 5 200E + P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: February 25, 2008 This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act - SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and Chapter 44 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) will be prepared. The Town seeks to conduct the scoping process in conformance with 6NYCRR Part 617.8, and requests the applicant to prepare and submit a Draft Scope. Title ofAction: Self Car Wash and Convenience Store (and gasoline filling station) Warex Terminal Corp. SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Description ofAction: The proposed action involves the alteration of an existing gas station, which will include the removal of the existing 3-bay service station to expand the existing convenience store, expansion of the existing gas pump canopy and addition of a new car wash. The expansion involves a 146 square feet (SF) addition to the convenience store, 907 SF for the car wash and approximately 3,434 SF for the canopy. Location: The site address is: 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The overall project site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection o£ Main Road (aka NYS Route 25) and Factory Avenue, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The site is an existing Citgo Gasoline Service Station. The parcel is zoned B (General Business) district and is 0.55 acres in size. SCTM No.: 1000-142-1-27 Determination of Significance • Self Car Wash and Convenience Store (and Gasoline Filling Station); Waremt Terminals Corp., Mattituck Reasons Supporting This Determination: The site has been evaluated in accordance with the Criteria for Determining Significance as contained in SEQRA 6NYCRR Part 617.7 (c). The following reasons are given in support of this determination of significance. 1. The Planning Board has conducted a thorough review of the information submitted by the applicant with respect to the proposed project. • Part 1 - Long Environmental Assessment Form • Site plan (revised submittal: 10/30/07) • Certified Survey • Construction Plans/elevations • Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated July 12, 2006 to Vivian Kamath (client representative) • Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated November 2, 2007 to Vivian Kamath (client representative) • Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated December 17, 2007 to Jeri Woodhouse, Planning Board Chair 2. Members of the Planning Board have inspected the subject site and have deliberated on information supplied by the applicant, information supplied at public work sessions and the following additional information: • Mattituck Fire District letter of June 28, 2006 • NYS Department of Transportation letter of July 7, 2006 • Suffolk County Water Authority letter of July13, 2006 • Office of the Engineer, Town of Southold letter dated October 25, 2006 • Southold Transportation Commission letter dated July 6, 2007 • Office of the Engineer, Town of Southold letter dated December 3, 2007 • Southold Transportation Commission letter dated November 27, 2007 • Nelson, Pope 8c Voorhis, LLC Consultant report to the Planning Board dated February 20, 2007, including Part 2 EAF and discussion of importance of impacts. 3. One or more potential significant adverse impacts have been identified as descn'bed herein. The identification of such impacts warrants the preparation of a DEIS. A DEIS will permit the Planning Board to coordinate with involved agencies and examine mitigation measures and possible alternatives which may reduce potential significant adverse impacts. 4. Water Resources Impacts - The project has water use considerations; car wash water reclamation is proposed; the project involves dispensing of gas using underground storage tanks. Grading, a neighboring retaining wall and the intervening fill and slopes between the north property line and the project site may result in erosion. 5. Transportation System Impacts - There is potential traffic generation, flow and safety impacts to Factory Avenue and the Factory Avenue and State Route 25 (Main Road) intersection due to car wash access and gas/convemenee store vehicle movements; the proximity of the project in relation to the shopping center to the north, the retail and storage uses to the west and the retail uses to the south of the proposed project complicate vehicle movements in this area. The parcel is located on the northeast corer of the Factory Avenue and State Route 25 intersection adjacent to the largest shopping center in the Hamlet of Mattimck. Tenants of the shopping center include a large grocery store (anchor), several restaurants and retail uses and the Town's only movie Page 2 • 0 Determination of Significance Self Car Wash and Convenience Store (and Gasoline Filling Station); Warex Terminals Corp., Mattituck theater. One of the ingress and egress points of this shopping center is located on Factory Avenue; this access offers the only traffic light controlled intersection available to users of the shopping center. The project proposes two ingress and one egress on Factory Avenue located between the shopping center access and the S.R 25/ Factory Avenue intersection. IM Lk stacking along Facto Avenue isalm a concern In addition, there is a boat storage facility whit t t iler movements at a yard directly west of the proposed new car wash access. There are also concerns with respect to the Magic Fountain ice cream store located opposite the site at the northwest comer of Main Road and Factory Avenue due to high levels of seasonal activity, as well as routine activity at this location, particularly due to the uncontrolled curb cuts existing at Main Road and Factory Avenue for this use. 6. Noise and Odor Impacts - The project will introduce a new activity, specifically the car wash, near residential use and zoning and will remove screening vegetation. 7. Public Safety Impacts - The project will add to intensification of site use and resultant coneestion in an area Nbleat to truck traffic and boat storage and hauling and-activi'ly- at Foun e cream shop, in ad tc ac! v2 ea y assoctated with Factory Avenue, Main R intersection. Pedestrian movement and safety due to this conga reported accidents should be examined. 8. Community Character and Aesthetics - Route 25 is a scenic by-way; landscaping and building design should consider aesthetics. The site is in proximity to residential uses diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Additional car wash access is in proximity to residential zoning and use and will remove vegetation which may provide screening from commercial activities. As a result, the Planning Board finds that a Positive Declaration is appropriate and a DEIS must be prepared. For Further Information Contact: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone: (631) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Town of Southold, Supervisor's Office Town of Southold, Town Clerk Town of Southold, Planning Board Town of Southold, Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Suffolk County Water Authority NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation, Commissioner, Albany NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation, Regional Office, Stony Brook NYS Dept. of Transportation Applicant Parties of Interest Officially on Record with the Town Clerk (if applicable) Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING REVIEW PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE DISCUSSION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Warex P;oject, 9945 Main Rd. Mattituck Prepared for: Town of Southold Planning Board - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 I FEB 2 5 ~ epared by: Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 (631) 427-5665 Contact: Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP Date. February 25, 2008 PROJECT NAME: Warex Project, Mattituck PROJECT TYPE: Site Plan Application LOCATION: 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 ZONING DISTRICT: B - General Business District OVERLAYS: NA TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 0.55 acres INTRODUCTION This document is a consultant report to assist the Planning Board and staff in the review of the above noted project. The site has been inspected by Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) and the submission materials noted herein have been evaluated. This report includes a summary of the site conditions and the proposed project, review of submitted materials, documentation of referrals, SEQRA Status, environmental and planning considerations, completion of a Part 2 EAF to examine project impacts and their magnitude, and a discussion of the importance of impacts to assist the Planning Board in evaluating the project and issuing a Determination of i Significance under SEQRA. • Warex, Mattttuck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07299 SITE DESCRIPTION The overall project site is located at the intersection of. Main Road (aka State Route 25) and Factory Avenue, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The 0.55-acre parcel is currently improved with an existing gas station, which consists of. a gas canopy housing three pumps, a 3-bay service station and a convenience store. The site is zoned B - General Business District, as are the parcels in the immediate area surrounding the site and fronting Main Road. The adjacent zoning districts north and south of Main Road are residentially zoned, with the exception of a parcel in the MI - Marine zoning district to the southeast. The MI zoning district is situated at the end of James Creek; it serves as a marina for boats to access Peconic Bay, through James Creek. Bay Avenue Park is located on Bay Avenue, along James Creek, south of the MI zoning district, consisting of a Little League baseball field, two tennis courts, a parking area and a wetlands area along James Creek. REQUESTED ACTION The proposed action involves the alteration of an existing gas station, which will include the removal of the existing 3-bay service station to expand the existing convenience store, expansion of the existing gas pump canopy and addition of a new car wash. The expansion involves a 146 square feet (SF) addition to the convenience store, 907 SF for the car wash and approximately 3,434 SF for the canopy. The existing gas pump canopy currently has three (3) gas pumps and is proposed to be expanded for a total of four (4) gas pumps, requiring an area large enough to satisfy the twelve (12) car queuing requirement. The proposal will require curb cuts and site access alterations: the existing curb cut on Main Road, closest to the intersection of Main Road and Factory Ave is proposed to be removed, patched, and improved with landscaping, the second existing curb cut along Main Road is proposed to be altered to allow right turn in and right turn out only. Along Factory Avenue the curb cut closest to the intersection of Main Road and Factory Avenue is proposed to be removed, patched, and improved with landscaping. Farther north along Factory Avenue a curb cut is proposed to allow full movements for site ingress and egress. At the northwest comer of the property a third curb cut is proposed that will serve as the entrance into the queuing line for the proposed car wash. The car wash is proposed to have a "Zero Discharge Car Wash Water Reclamation System", which will require approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services- The perimeter of the property is to be improved with two benches along Main Road and landscaping as detailed in the site plan. SITE PLAN SUBMISSION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION The Applicant has provided the following forms, which comply with the Town's Site Plan Application submission requirements: • Part I - Long Environmental Assessment Form • Site plan (revised submittal: 10/30/07) Page 2 • Warex,Mattitnck Environmental Planning Review NP&V Na 87298 • Certified Survey • Construction Plans/elevations In addition, the applicant has retained a traffic engineer to provide consultation on site access and transportation impacts. The following letters were received and reviewed: • Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated July 12, 2006 to Vivian Kamath (client representative) This letter documents capacity analysis of the Factor Avenue/Main Road intersection finding that the project will have minimal impact on the intersection. The letter includes an access evaluation which notes that reduction of existing curb cuts is recommended and access will be adequate. The letter notes that cross access to the shopping center to the east was attempted, but not successful. The document does not address movement within the site, parking, queuing for site uses and the second site access for the car wash. • Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated November 2, 2007 to I 'Man Kamath (client representative) This letter is a revision to the July 12, 2006 letter prepared to address turning radius on westbound Main Road to northbound Factory Avenue, and car wash queuing. The applicant has offered a dedication of land to improve the above noted turning radius. Car wash queuing was evaluated finding that stacking for 11 vehicles is provided and at 3 minutes per vehicle, 31 vehicles per your evaluation can be processed or stored on site. Given the car wash trip generation of 16 vehicles per hour, the study contends that queuing is adequate. The study does not address movements within the site, contingencies or the additional access on Factory Avenue for the car wash. • Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated December 17, 2007 to Jeri Woodhouse, Planning Board Chair This letter responds to questions from the Planning Board meeting of December 3, 2007 regarding trip generation of the car wash by providing data to support the assertion that self-serve car washes generate less trips than full service car washes. The letter contends that the trip generation used in the analysis is conservative and results in a "worst-case" analysis. f I REMMALS • Mattituck Fire District letter ofJune 28, 2006 This letter indicates that the existing fire hydrants in the area provide adequate water supply. The letter recommends that all roads and driveways meet Town clearance and right-of-way requirements. • NYS Department of Transportation letter of July 7, 2006 The letter outlines the permit requirements for access to the State Highway and recommends only a right turn ingress on Route 25 (Main Road). The letter also notes that the drainage design appears to contribute runoff to the State Highway, and should be revised to contain stormwater on the site. The most recent plan shows egress (right turn out) access to Route 25. • Suffolk County Water Authority letter ofJulyl3, 2006 SCWA states that the project is not expected to impact the Laurel Lake Wellfield, but due to potential high water use, there may be extraordinary water tap requirements. • Wice of the Engineer, Town of Southold letter dated October 25, 2006 The letter notes that the project requires a lot line change, permission of the adjoining owner, and recommends an evaluation of the impact the lot line change will have on the adjoining parking Page 3 • • warex, Mattitnck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 lot. The Engineer comments that this is a major renovation which should meet current standards including location of underground storage tanks; existing and proposed tanks and appropriate SCDHS permits should be produced. The letter notes that NYSDOT curb cut approvals are necessary. Finally, drainage calculations are required. In closing, the letter notes that the traffic circulation on the 6/28/06 architect site plan is better than prior proposals. • Southold Transportation Commission letter dated July 6, 2007 The Commission expressed concern over the width of the Factory Avenue access and the turnaround radius for the car wash. The letter also notes that Route 25 is a NYS Scenic Road and landscaping/design should ensure the project is aesthetically pleasing without adversely impacting sight distance at the intersection. • ice of the Engineer, Town of Southold letter dated December 3, 2007 This letter updates comments for current site plans dated 10/30/07. 1) Drainage comments note the following: only new impervious surfaces are used to determine new drainage; concern over runoff to Factory Avenue; inlet sizes and numbering of leaching pools are needed; and, potential for determining new drainage based on the entire site; 2) The pavement, property line required setback of 4 feet, is reduced to 2 feet in the northwest and northeast parts of the site; 3) The proposed curb and pavement in the northwest part of the site will remove 2 large trees; is replacement being considered?; 4) The car wash entrance radius of 24' is tight and may create conflicts for vehicles accessing the car wash; 5) Willi respect to grading, proposed elevations north of the building and at the end of the turning radius are too high relative to the retaining wall on the adjoining property. Comments indicate that the existing retaining wall should not support additional fill; erosion control is of concern due to slopes; guard rails may be needed due to the steep drop and further engineering review is needed for grading; 6) NYSDOT approval is needed and the plan modified per DOT review; and 7) The dedication of 231 square feet at the intersection (Factory/Main) is noted, but NYSDOT input is requested to ensure that the dedicated area is sufficient to permit adequate radius and design changes. The Town Engineer also found the Durm Engineering traffic assessment to be adequate. • Southold Transportation Commission letter dated November 27, 2007 This updates the prior Commission letter with a recommendation for approval subject to scenic quality being addressed through landscaping and building design. It is noted that the applicant addressed the Town Engineer comments in a letter dated December 12, 2007 with 3 plan revisions: 1) Drainage calculations/design are changed to address all site generated runoff and to prohibit excess runoff from entering Factory Avenue; 2) The 4 foot pavement to property line setback is now provided; and 3) Trees have been added to the plan to compensate for removal of large trees at the north property line. ZBA VARIANCES The proposed project requires three variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), specifically, a side yard setback variance for the building (15' where 25' is required), a front yard setback variance due to the canopy (8.33' where previous relief was given to 11.5') and an increase in size of the canopy above the 60 linear foot limit of frontage on one street to allow a 67' structure. The ZBA is also considering a Special Exception for the car wash use. Page 4 0 0 Warex,Mattitack Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 SEQRASTATUS The Planning Board conducted a coordinated review for lead agency commencing on September 11, 2007. The action was classified as an Unlisted Action, and the Planning Board assumed lead agency for SEQRA review of the project on October 15, 2007. A SEQRA Determination of Significance should be issued once the Planning Board determines that there is sufficient information to render a determination. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES There are no designated tidal or freshwater wetlands within approximately 1,500 feet of the property. The entire property is already developed with the gas station and parking lot. The underlying soil according to the Suffolk County Soil Survey (Warner, 1975) is identified as CuB - Cut and Fill, gently sloping. Any development constraints were mitigated during the original construction of the gas station, therefore no significant impact on soils and topography are anticipated The site is an existing gasoline filling station with underground tanks for fuel storage. A review of the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) Distribution Maps from 2007 indicates that there are two water mains near the subject property: the first is located along Main Road and the second along Factory Avenue. The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the USGS Water Resources Investigation Report 2000. The topographic elevation of the property is approximately 25 feet above msl, based on the USGS Topographic Quadrangle for the area. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 22 feet. The subject property is located south of the north fork groundwater divide. The direction of groundwater flow is expected to be horizontal and to the south towards James Creek and Peconic Bay. The site is in an area of archaeological sensitivity according to the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation maps, but has been subject to substantial disturbance as a result of prior development and therefore is not expected to yield cultural artifacts. No other significant natural resources were encountered as the site is current a developed gas station. 4 Page 5 • wam, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS The site is zoned B (General Business) and is surrounded by businesses fronting Route 25 in this area of the site. Diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest is R-40 zoning and residences fronting Factory Avenue. The site is an existing gas station with 3 repair bays and an office which sells some convenience items; 2 pump islands are located beneath an existing canopy. There are currently 2 curb cuts on Main Road and I curb cut on Factory Avenue; with the west Main Road curb cut and the Factory Avenue curb cut located close to the Main/Factory intersection. Vegetation north of the building provides some screening and green between the shopping center and service station; however, it is noted that most of the existing landscaping is sparse and not well maintained. The proposed project will remove the service bays, expand the convenience store, add a car wash to the back of the building and maintain the existing pump islands under a new enlarged canopy. There is an improvement to curb cuts on Route 25 by removing the west curb cut, and only allowing rights-in, rights-out for the east curb cut. Along Factory Avenue, a full ingress/egress of 30 feet in width is proposed farther north than the existing curb cut; however, a separate 15 foot car wash ingress is added. Factory Avenue is a heavily used connector road between CR 48 and Main Road. In addition, a boat storage facility which involves trailer transport movements is located directly opposite the new ingress for the car wash and near the relocated driveway access and trucks entering the shopping center to the north and east often "stack" along the east side of Factory Avenue before entering the shopping center. The proposed action requires three (3) dimensional variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals, as well as a Special Permit to permit a car wash use on the property. Other involved transportation approvals include the NYSDOT for curb cuts on State Route 25, and a curb cut modification on the Town controlled Factory Avenue. The SCDHS must approve tank storage and facilities for storage and handling of toxic and hazardous materials (Article 12) and must approve sanitary facilities under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. There is sienific~m withers=t to intensification of the use of the site particularly in view of its location at a bus intersection with various levels of vehicle movement caused by conditions an uses in proximity to the subject site. The Planning Board seeks a thorough review of potential. impacts, available mitigation and alternatives in order to conduct site plan review and coordinate with other involved agencies. POTENTIAL IMPACTS A Part 2 Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) has been completed for the proposed action and is included as an Attachment. Several items were identified as potential impacts and are Page 6 • • Warex, Mattitaek Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 tentatively indicated as Small to Moderate Impact; however, further information may be needed to finalize this category and ensure that no adverse environmental impacts will occur. Further discussion is provided below: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? The project has water use considerations, car wash water reclamation is proposed,- the project involves dispensing of gas using underground storage tanks. The Town Engineer requested information concerning SCDHS tank permits and identification of existing and proposed tanks on the site. No additional information was provided to NP&V. SCWA indicated that there may be extraordinary water tap requirements associated with this project. It is noted that the project will receive water from SCWA, and the Authority has indicated that water can be supplied to the site. Additional water tap requirements may depend upon the car wash facility, since the convenience store and gas station have relatively low water supply demand. The site is 0.55 acres in size and has an allowable flow of 330 GPD, with an expected design flow of 81 GPD indicating low water use and discharge. Reclamation of car wash water is proposed which will reduce water demand. SCDHS review is required under Article 6 for density, and Article 12 for tank storage. The gas station currently exists and must have tanks registered under Article 12. SCDHS applications should be filed for facilities on the site and for site plan approval of the sanitary systems and flow. SCWA should be contacted for water supply availability and approvals. Agency coordination will assist in assessing potential impacts. 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runot? Grading; a neighboring retaining wdtl and the intervening f111 and slopes between the north property line and the project site may result in erosion. Comments by the Town Engineer expressed concern with respect to grading and the transition to the neighboring propetty near the north property line. No additional inforination was provided to NP&V. The bottom of curb height of 24.63 feet, and the top of wall height of 21.92 feet indicates a vertical change of 2.71 feet over a 4 foot distance, or a slope of 68%. Potential erosion toward the neighboring property needs to be adequately addressed to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer. Grading, drainage and erosion control must be evaluated and mitigated. 11. Will Proposed Action affect awthetl resources? Route 25 is a Designated New York State Scenic Byway, landscaping and building design should consider aesthetics. The site is in proximity to residential uses diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest. A rendering of the new building has been provided and the landscape plan reviewed. The architectural design appears to be a substantial improvement based on the new canopy design as compared to the existing canopy. The sloped roof and shingle treatment is an improvement over the current canopy. The building will remain much the same but will be architecturally enhanced. Site landscaping will be coordinated and much improved over current conditions. The plant materials include trees where space permits and will use deciduous as well as coniferous trees. Other areas will be enhanced with groundoover vegetation and flowering plants. The reduction of a curb out on Route 25, and replacement with a right-in, right-out configuration that permits a landscape triangle will also be an improvement; however, an additional curb cut will be added to Factory Avenue. There are residential homes diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest. Trees on the north part of the site will be removed and will reduce aesthetics and screening with Page 7 • • Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 limited area for replanting of landscape vegetation. Installation of benches in a landscape setting along Route 25 is viewed as an improvement over existing conditions; however, the aesthetics of this site development with respect to the Route 25 scenic by-way is an important consideration for evaluation and appropriate mitigation. 15. Will there bean effect to existinglranspaztatiamAmtems There is potential impact to Factory Avenue and the State Route 25 intersection due to car wash access and gas/convenience store vehicle movements. In addition, there is a boat storage facility which involves trailer movements at a yard directly west of the proposed new car wash access. Truck stacking associated with the chnr~ning rnnrer along Faciorv Avenue isnlsa »~or» The area is also subject to seasonal traffic fluctuations which increase trip generation to the area and complicate traffic flow and interaction. I Movement of traffic within the site, and on Factory Avenue and the State Route 25 intersection adjoining the site, is of concern. The turning radius for the car wash was identified as an issue by the Town Engineer. The end of the turn at the point where vehicles maneuver to enter the self- service car wash building opening seems problematic, particularly for larger SW/van vehicles. If a vehicle cannot enter the building, the ensuing backup and logistics of correction of the situation could be very problematic. The separate self-service car wash entrance is understandable as not all patrons of the gas station will wash their cars. However, an additional curb cut for entrance and the need for those who do obtain gas or convenience items to exit, then re-enter the site is not optimum. There is potential traffic eeiteration flow and safety impacts FacM Ammuc andAbe,,Factory Avenue and State Route 25 (Main Road) intersection due to cu mmah gprcss and s/ vemen e store vehicle movements, the proximity of a project in relation to the shopping center to the north; the retail and storage uses to the west and the retail uses to the south of the proposed project complicate vehicle movements in this area. The parcel is located on the northeast corner of the Factory Avenue and State Route 25 intersection adjacent to the largest shopping center in the Hamlet of Mattituck. Tenants of the shopping center include a large grocery store (anchor), several restaurants and retail uses and the Town's only movie theater. One of the ingress and egress points of this shopping center is located on Eagt= Avenue- this access offers the o traffic fight controlled intersection available to users of the shoonine center The project proposes two ingress and one egr Factory Avenue located between the shopping center access and the S.R 25/ Factory Avenue intersection. There is a situation where trucks stack along the east side of Factory Avenue to access the shopping center driveway to the north of the subject site. In addition, there is a boat storage facility which involves trailer movements at a yard directly west of the proposed new car wash access. There are also concerns with respect to the Magic Fountain ice cream store located opposite the site at the northwest comet of Main Road and Factory Avenue due to high levels of seasonal activity, as well as routine activity at this location, particularly due to the uncontrolled curb cuts existing at Main Road and Factory Avenue for this use. The area is also subject to seasonal traffic fluctuations which increase trip generation to the area and complicate traffic flow and interaction. These concerns, together with potential stacking issues due to the tight radius noted above, and v vehicle movements do warrant further evaluation. In addition, Planning staff indicates that personal communication with the police dartrnent indicates that 61 accidents were recorded at Page 8 • • Ware; Mattituek Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 the Factory/Main Road intersection in the past five years. As a result, car wash turning radius, vehicle stacking and movements within the site and toward the new car wash entrance warrant further evaluation and mitigation to the satisfaction of the Planning Board. 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? The project will introduce a new activity, specifically the car wash, near residential use and zoning and will remove screening vegetation. The proposed action will result in a new activity in the north part of the site, not far from existing residential zoning (RAO) and an existing residence diagonally across Factory Avenue from the northwest comer of the site. It is noted that residences along Factory Avenue in this area, are situated near Factory Avenue, and across from a parking lot for a commercial center which also has an access farther north on Factory Avenue. In addition, the southemmost residence adjoins a boat storage facility. As a result, the dominant source of noise is expected to be Factory Avenue, with other levels of activity present along this segment of road. The relative impact of adding a curb cut in an active area, removal of existing trees that provide screening and and possible attenuation with limited area for reinstallation of landscaping is a noted impact. The hours of operation and noise odors associated with the facility warrant further evaluation. I& X11 Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Safety related to pedestrian movements in the vicinity of the site due to traffic congestion and intensification ofstte use. The project will add to intensification of site use and resultant congestion in an area subject to truck traffic and stacking, boat storage and hauling and activity at the Magic Fountain ice cream shop, in addition to traffic activity already associated with Factory Avenue, Main Road and the intersection. Pedestrian movement and safety due to this congestion and reported accidents should be examined. 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Additional car wash access is in proximity to residential zoning and use and will remove vegetation which may provide screening from commercial activities. The project site is zoned B (General Business) and the site is currently occupied by a gas station and 3 service bays. The proposed project will result in certain aesthetic improvements to the site including awhitecture of the canopy and a coordinated landscape plan. The convenience store will result in some increase in use intensity but the facility currently does provide some convenience goods to patrons. The site plan provides parking for the convenience store and queuing for the gas station, a dumpster location (which is improved over current conditions), as well as improved access and reduction in curb cuts on Route 25. The gas station and convenience store do not represent a concern. The car wash is a self-service type that does involve less activity than a fidl car wash; however, concern over queuing, turning radius and potential impact on Factory Avenue expressed above remain a concern that should be addressed. The overall intensification of the site use is of concern. The combination of a car wash, gas station and convenience store, on a small site in proximity to an active intersection with other vehicle and truck movements will exacerbate the current level of congestion and activity. The proximity to residences and intensification of site use including the removal of trees and added car wash activity, coupled with the additional curb cut on Factory Avenue is expected to change the character of the community. Page 9 Warez, Mattitack Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07299 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION This document addresses information available to date and offers consideration of potential impacts of the project in the context of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The Part 1 EAF was reviewed and a Part 2 EAF has been completed and attached. Further evaluation of the issues identified in the Part 2 EAF indicate that potential impacts are potentially large. The Planning Board feels that additional information is warranted in order to evaluate impacts, mitigation and alternatives, and the Board also finds that coordination with other involved agencies through SEQRA would be beneficial for project review. These issues are summarized as follows: Water Resources The project has water use considerations; car wash water reclamation is proposed; the project involves dispensing of gas using underground storage tanks. Grading, a neighboring retaining wall and the intervening fill and slopes between the north property line and the project site may result in erosion. Transportation and Safety There is potential impact to Factory Avenue and the intersection of State Route 25 due to car wash access and gas/convenience store vehicle movements. In addition, there is a boat storage facility which involves trailer movements at a yard directly west of the proposed new car wash access. The Magic Fountain ice cream store located across Factory Avenue, opposite the site, is cause for concern due to high levels of seasonal activity, and particularly due to the uncontrolled curb cuts existing at Main Road and Factory Avenue for this use. Truck stacking along Factory Avenue is also a concern, as is the seasonal increase in traffic. Safety related to pedestrian movements in the vicinity of the site due to traffic congestion and intensification of site use is also an issue. Noise and Odors The project will introduce a new activity, specifically the car wash, near residential use and zoning and will remove existing screening vegetation. Community Character and Aesthetics Route 25 is a Designated New York State Scenic Byway; landscaping and building design should consider aesthetics. The site is in proximity to residential uses diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Additional car wash access is in proximity to residential zoning and use and will remove vegetation which may provide screening from commercial activities. If during the course of review the Planning Board identifies one or more potential significant adverse impacts, then a Positive Declaration is required and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement must be prepared. The review contained herein has identified a number of potential significant adverse impacts and as a result, the preparation of a DEIS is appropriate. A DEIS will also allow the Planning Board to more thoroughly evaluate necessary mitigation measures and possible alternatives to the proposed action that may reduce anticipated impacts. Page 10 i i • Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 ATTACHMENT A PART 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM I Page 11 Wa Project, 9945 Maly Road, Maldlueik NPa<V 887298 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibllity of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) I In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer H not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. I The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by shoring types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnhWe that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site otherexamples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation In Part 3. I The lnpacts of each project, on each sue, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive Nat of Impacts and thresholds to answer each question. 1 The number of examples per question does not Indicate the importance of each question. I In Identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if More will be arty Impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. Q If answering Yes to a question that check the appropriate box(column t or 2)to indicate the potential size of the Impact If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold Is low erthan exempla, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily siga8luent Any large Impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that It be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about stye of the Impact than consider the Impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. L If a potentially large Impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by chengs(s)1(i the project to a smal to moderate Impart, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 . Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mtlgatedby F E B 2 5 2008 Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1: WIII the Proposed Acton result in a physical change to the project are? No ? YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greeter, (15 foot Q Yes ©No rise per 100 toot of length), orwhem the general slopes in the projad. area exceed 10L • Construction on lend where the depth to the water table © ©Yes ONO is less gun 3 feaL Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more Q Q Yes ?No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or Yes ©No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will condme for more than I year or Q Yes QNo involve mom than one phase orstage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove © Yes []No more than 1,000 tons of natural material (La., rock or sal) per year. Page 11 of 21 I Warax Prejmt, 9943 Mate Road, Mattdrxdt NPBV#07298 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction orexpansionofasantarylandfill. ? ? ?Yea ?No • Construction in a designated Boodwsy. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: 13 13 0yes OW 2. VIII there be an affect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the ate? p.e, dgfe, dunes, geological formelbns, sit) rXINO [IVES • Specific land forms: ? ? ?Yes ?No Impact on Mater - 3. VA Proposed Action aged any water body designated as protected? (Linder Articles 10, 24.25 of the EmAm mantal Conservation Law, ECL) [F] NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Dewdopabk anon of site contains a protected water body. ? ? ?Yes ©No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of ? ? ?Yes ? No a protected stream. • Extension of utility dlsblMdion faaa0las through a protected water ? ?Yes ? No body- • Constrodbo in a desigmted hashwater artidalwetland. ? ? ?Yas ? No • Other trnpacts: © ? ?Yes ® No 4. V0 Proposed Action of ed any non-prodded existing or new body of wafer? EINO ?YPS Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the suraco area of any body of ? ? ?Yes ? No water or more than a 10 acre Increase or decrease. • Construction ofabody ofwater that exceeds 10acres ofsurface ? ? ?Yes ?No area. • Other lmpBctw []Yes []No Page 12 of 21 i Wares ProjeN, 9945 Mafs Itself, Mattitack NP&V NM9a 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change S. VA Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? NO ?a YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ? • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit, ~ ? [:]Yes No • Proposed Action requires use of a source orwater that does not o ? ® Yes ? No have approval to save proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells wily greater 0 ? [:]Yes © No than 46 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ? ? ElYes ? No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ? © ©Yes ? No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which © © ®Yes ? No Presddly do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,goo gallons ? ? ? Yes ? No perday. • Proposed Action wig likely cause situation or other discharge into ? ? © Yes ? No an existing body o(water to the extent" there will bean obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require lye storage of petroleum or ? ? ? Yea ? No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow reakkmfial uses In areas without ? ? ?Yee ?No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ? ® Ely's ? No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage faculties. • Otharimpachr ? Dylas El No Water use considerations; car wash water reclamation existing and proposed tank storage; pmjset site involves dispensing of gas using uodatimuod storage tanks. Page 13 of 21 Wsm Projwt, 9945 MW Reed. Manituck j NP&Y #M98 1 2 3 smell to Potential Can Impact Be Moderata Large MM 98W by Impact Impact ProjectChange 8. Will Proposed Action allerdrainage 8oworps8ems,orsurface water runWl7 ONO [DYES Examplss that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action is incompatible with exlsWmg drainage patterns. ? ? []Yes ONO • Proposed Action will allow development In a designated ? ? ©Yas ?No floodway. • Otherlmpacts: ? ID Ely" EINO Grading retaining wall and slope between north property line and property to north any result in erosion NPACTONAIR 7. tlUdl Proposed Action effect atrque8ty? [D NO []YES Exsmplon that would apply to eohM 2 • Proposed Action will Induce 1,WBormore vehicle trips in any ? ® ?Yes ONO givwm how. • Proposed Action will resWt In the Incineration of more than i ton ? ? ?Yes ONO of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 Ibs, per hour ? ® ?Yes ?No or a heat source producing more than 10 millon HTlys per hour. • Proposed Action will allow anIncrease Intheamount ofland ? ? ?Yes ?No committed to Industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an Increase In the density of ? ? Oyes ONO Industrial development within existing Industrial areas, • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND AMML4 8. WWI Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? [ENO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species fisted on the New York or ? ? ?Yes ?No Federal fist, using the site. over or now the site, or found on the site. i Page 14 of 21 I i •0 1Yara Prajat, 9945 Main Read, Mantua • NP&V #07290 1 2 3 Smog to Potendal Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat © © ElYes [:]No • ApPlIcegon of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, © © ©Yes ON, other than foragriculturel purposes. • Otherimpects: 0 0 QYes ©No S. vvll Proposed Action subslantially aRectnon- matened or non- - endangered species? MNO [D YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially Interfere with any resider ©Yes []No or m%Ptory fish. shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ® ©Yea []NO mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. OMerimpacis: © ©Yes ONo WACT ON AGRIOUL7URALwND RESOURCES - - - 10. W01?ProposedA affect agricultural land resources? NO r7. YES Examples thatwould applyto column 2. • The Proposed Action would aever,cross orlimit aocess10 ® Q []Yes []No agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, eta) • Construction activity would excavate or Compact the soil profile of 0 © ®Yes [:]No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more then 10 © © © Yea [3No acres of agricultural land or, 9located In an Agdoulturai District, more than 20 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 Wam Project, 9945 Main Read, Mardbwk NP&V de72M 1 2 3 Small to potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large tdttlpatedby Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent Installation of ? ? ? Yes ? No agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain Anew, outlet ditches, strip cropping): or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due lo Increased runoff). • Othsrimpacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No MACTON AESTHETIC RESOURCES j 11. MI Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EM Addendum in Section 617.20•Appendbc B.) ?NO (@YES Examples that would apply to 0Dft n 2 • Proposed lard uses, or project mnponenta obviously different ? ? ?Yes ? No from or in sharp contrast to atarem surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ? ? ?Yes © No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the sesUKdcquagdes of dot resource. • Project components that will result in the eAmNadon or ? ? ?Yes ? m signllicant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • tither irvacta. ? 10 ?Yes ? No Route 25 Is a sink road; landscaping and bdldbrg design should consider acsthetics; site is in diagonally across Fae 1iry ro tenidmtial nee Cory Aveone to the northeast, MACTONMTORICIWDARCHAEOLOGICAI.RESOURCEB - 12. Will Proposed Action Impact any S M or structure of histode, prehistoric or pabonlologlcal Importance? ff) NO ?YES Examples thatwoutd apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or © ? ? Yes ? No substantially contiguous to any fedAly or aft listed on the State or National Register of historic. places. • Any Impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ? ? ? Yes ? No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area deatgnsted as sensitive ? ? ? Yes © No forarchasological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 i i Warm Project, 9945 Main Road• MaWdwk NP&V #D729a t 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be tdodwata Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Projed Change • Dther Impacts: ? © ? Yes ©No NWACTON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Wig proposed Action affect the quantityorquaDty of existing or future open cesorrecreationalopportunities? e]NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent toredpsurs of a future recreational opportunity. ? ? ?Yes nNo • A major reduction of en open space Important to the community. ? ? ?yes ?No • Otherimpeds: ? ? ?Yea ?No MACTONCRRICALMAIRONMENTALAREAS - - 14. Ml Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique charadarlatks of a CdttcaI ernrimnmental area (CEA) established Pursuant kp subdMsbn OWCRR 617.14(g)7 ?e NO ?YES List the erlVironmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Eptampba that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? © ? ©Yes ?No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of Me ? ? ? Yes ?No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction In the quality of the ? ? ? Yes ?No resource? • Proposed Action will Impart the use. function or enjoyment of the ? ? ?Yes ?No resource? • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No Page 17 of 21 I Worm Pro)ect, 9945 Main Roaq Maabuck NP&V #07299 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Import Be Moderate Large Mitigator! by Impact Impact Project Change 6JIPACTON TRANSPORTATION 15. VAI1 Mere bean effect to existing transportation systems? ? NO O YES Exarnplas tIW would apply to column 2 ? ? ?Yes []No • Altera0onOfpreseMpaftmofmovementofpeople andfor goods. • proposed Action will result in major Im le problems. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Other Impacts., ? ?Yas ? No Pwatiml#arbupael to FntaryAwae due tow wash sews mad eWeasycole eWorewksk aormma, bar traobod sod *-p advhie oeea disaly oppalto the sew ingress; beak a-Mot; aloog Factory AveoasNw a con"M The for cnaoo akap web ofineade addabWe MIPACyON ENERGY 15. Will ProposadAdlon affect the community's sources of fuel or aargy supply? QNO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ? ? ®Yea ? No • Proposed Argon will cause a greater than 5% Increase in the use of arty bin of energy In the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ? ?Yes [3No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family M01ftnoss or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other Impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No NOISE ANDOOORMACT 17. tMa them be objectionable odes, nose, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ?NO E]YES Examples flat would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ? ? ? Yes ? No faulty. • Odors will oasis routinely (more than one hour per day). ? ? ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ? ? ©Yes ? No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structunm • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers thetwould ad as a ? ? ?Yes ? No noise screen. • Other ads: ? 0 ?Yes ?No Projed will iatroducc a new activity (car wash) am residential use and zoning and wi8 remove screening vegatatina. Page 18 of 21 i i Wam Project, 9915 Maio Road, Matdtuek NPOW 007298 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Projed Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. WIN Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ? NO [9YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ? ? ?Yes ? No hazardous substances (Le. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, eta) In the avant of accident or upset conditions, or More may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of `hazardous wastes' ? ? ?Yes ?No in any form 0.e. loxle, poisonous, highly reactive, redloadive, . inflating, infectious, etc.) • Storage faciNties for one million or more gallons of liquefied ? © ?Yes ?No natural gas or other flammable Nqulde. Proposed Action may read In the excavation or other ? ? ©Yes ?No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other Impacts: ? Q ?Yes ?No Safety related to pedesbion movements in the vicinity of the site due to baffm congestion and intensification of site use. VWACTONGROWTHANDCHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. WIN Proposed Action afiedthe character of the existing community? ? NO ? YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Pammanent population at the city, town or village In which the ? ? ?Yes ?No project Is located is Btey to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ? ? ?Yes ?No services will Increase by more than 5% par year as a result of this Project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ? © Elyse ?No goals. • Proposed Action wig cause a change in the density of land use. ? [Hi ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing faclliffes, ? © []Yes ? No structures or areas of historic Importance to the community. • Development wig create a demand for additional community ? ? ?Yes ?No services (e.g. schools, police and flre, eta) Page 19 of 21 Wares PmJee4 9945 Main Rand, Hardtack NP&y 907298 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an Important precedent fortulure ? ? ? yes ? No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment ? ? Oyes ONO • Other impacts' ? 0 Oyes ? No Additional car wash eeeess in proximity to residential zoning and use; and will remove existing vegeution which may provide scraping ttom commercial activities. 20. Is there, or Is there 0tely to be, IN tft controversy related to potential - - adverse environment knpacla7 E) No OYES If Any Actlort In Part 2 IS Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 i Page 20 of 21 • t ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING REVIEW PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE DISCUSSION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Warex Project, 9945 Main Rd. Mattituck Prepared for: Town of Southold Planning Board r~ P.O. Box 1179 _ Southold, New York 11971 t EB 2 5 P~epared by. Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 (631) 427-5665 Contact: Charles L Voorhis, CEP, AICP Date: February 25, 2008 PROJECT NAME: Warex Project, Mattituck PROJECT TYPE: Site Plan Application LOCATION: 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 ZONING DISTRICT: B - General Business District OVERLAYS: NA TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 0.55 acres INTRODUCTION This document is a consultant report to assist the Planning Board and staff in the review of the above noted project. The site has been inspected by Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) and the submission materials noted herein have been evaluated. This report includes a summary of the site conditions and the proposed project, review of submitted materials, documentation of referrals, SEQRA Status, environmental and planning considerations, completion of a Part 2 EAF to examine project impacts and their magnitude, and a discussion of the importance of impacts to assist the Planning Board in evaluating the project and issuing a Determination of Significance under SEQRA. Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 SITE DESCRIPTION The overall project site is located at the intersection of. Main Road (aka State Route 25) and Factory Avenue, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The 0.55-acre parcel is currently improved with an existing gas station, which consists of. a gas canopy housing three pumps, a 3-bay service station and a convenience store. The site is zoned B - General Business District, as are the parcels in the immediate area surrounding the site and fronting Main Road. The adjacent zoning districts north and south of Main Road are residentially zoned, with the exception of a parcel in the MI - Marine zoning district to the southeast. The MI zoning district is situated at the end of James Creek; it serves as a marina for boats to access Peconic Bay, through James Creek. Bay Avenue Park is located on Bay Avenue, along James Creek, south of the MI zoning district, consisting of a Little League baseball field, two tennis courts, a parking area and a wetlands area along James Creek. REQUESTED ACTION The proposed action involves the alteration of an existing gas station, which will include the removal of the existing 3-bay service station to expand the existing convenience store, expansion of the existing gas pump canopy and addition of a new car wash. The expansion involves a 146 square feet (SF) addition to the convenience store, 907 SF for the car wash and approximately 3,434 SF for the canopy. The existing gas pump canopy currently has three (3) gas pumps and is proposed to be expanded for a total of four (4) gas pumps, requiring an area large enough to satisfy the twelve (12) car queuing requirement. The proposal will require curb cuts and site access alterations: the existing curb cut on Main Road, closest to the intersection of Main Road and Factory Ave is proposed to be removed, patched, and improved with landscaping, the second existing curb cut along Main Road is proposed to be altered to allow right turn in and right turn out only. Along Factory Avenue the curb cut closest to the intersection of Main Road and Factory Avenue is proposed to be removed, patched, and improved with landscaping. Farther north along Factory Avenue a curb cut is proposed to allow full movements for site ingress and egress. At the northwest corner of the property a third curb cut is proposed that will serve as the entrance into the queuing line for the proposed car wash. The car wash is proposed to have a "Zero Discharge Car Wash Water Reclamation System", which will require approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The perimeter of the property is to be improved with two benches along Main Road and landscaping as detailed in the site plan. SITE PLAN SUBMISSION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION The Applicant has provided the following forms, which comply with the Town's Site Plan Application submission requirements: • Part 1 - Long Environmental Assessment Form • Site plan (revised submittal: 10/30/07) Page 2 • Warex,Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 • Certified Survey • Construction Plans/elevations In addition, the applicant has retained a traffic engineer to provide consultation on site access and transportation impacts. The following letters were received and reviewed: • Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated July 12, 2006 to Vivian Kamath (client representative) This letter documents capacity analysis of the Factor Avenue/Main Road intersection finding that the project will have minimal impact on the intersection. The letter includes an access evaluation which notes that reduction of existing curb cuts is recommended and access will be adequate. The letter notes that cross access to the shopping center to the east was attempted, but not successful. The document does not address movement within the site, parking, queuing for site uses and the second site access for the car wash. • Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated November 1, 2007 to Vivian Kamath (client representative) This letter is a revision to the July 12, 2006 letter prepared to address turning radius on westbound Main Road to northbound Factory Avenue, and car wash queuing. The applicant has offered a dedication of land to improve the above noted turning radius. Car wash queuing was evaluated finding that stacking for 11 vehicles is provided and at 3 minutes per vehicle, 31 vehicles per your evaluation can be processed or stored on site. Given the car wash trip generation of 16 vehicles per hour, the study contends that queuing is adequate. The study does not address movements within the site, contingencies or the additional access on Factory Avenue for the car wash. • Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated December 17, 2007 to Jeri Woodhouse, Planning Board Chair This letter responds to questions from the Planning Board meeting of December 3, 2007 regarding trip generation of the car wash by providing data to support the assertion that self-serve car washes generate less trips than full service car washes. The letter contends that the trip generation used in the analysis is conservative and results in a "worst-case" analysis. REFERRALS • Mattituck Fire District letter of June 28, 2006 Tbis letter indicates that the existing fire hydrants in the area provide adequate water supply. The letter recommends that all roads and driveways meet Town clearance and right-of-way requirements. • NYS Department of Transportation letter of July 7, 2006 The letter outlines the permit requirements for access to the State Highway and recommends only a right turn ingress on Route 25 (Main Road). The letter also notes that the drainage design appears to contribute runoff to the State Highway, and should be revised to contain stotmwater on the site. The most recent plan shows egress (right turn out) access to Route 25. • Suffolk County Water Authority letter ofJulyl3, 2006 SCWA states that the project is not expected to impact the Laurel Lake Wellfield, but due to potential high water use, there may be extraordinary water tap requirements. • ice of the Engineer, Town of Southold letter dated October 15, 2006 The letter notes that the project requires a lot line change, permission of the adjoining owner, and recommends an evaluation of the impact the lot line change will have on the adjoining parking Page 3 • Warex, Maltituek Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 lot. The Engineer comments that this is a major renovation which should meet current standards including location of underground storage tanks; existing and proposed tanks and appropriate SCDHS permits should be produced. The letter notes that NYSDOT curb cut approvals are necessary. Finally, drainage calculations are required. In closing, the letter notes that the traffic circulation on the 6/28/06 architect site plan is better than prior proposals. • Southold Transportation Commission letter dated July 6, 2007 The Commission expressed concern over the width of the Factory Avenue access and the turnaround radius for the car wash. The letter also notes that Route 25 is a NYS Scenic Road and landscaping/design should ensure the project is aesthetically pleasing without adversely impacting sight distance at the intersection. • tyke of the Engineer, Town of Southold letter dated December 3, 2007 This letter updates comments for current site plans dated 10130/07. 1) Drainage comments note the following: only new impervious surfaces are used to determine new drainage; concern over runoff to Factory Avenue; inlet sizes and numbering of leaching pools are needed; and, potential for determining new drainage based on the entire site; 2) The pavement, property line required setback of 4 feet, is reduced to 2 feet in the northwest and northeast parts of the site; 3) The proposed curb and pavement in the northwest part of the site will remove 2 large trees; is replacement being considered?; 4) The car wash entrance radius of 24' is tight and may create conflicts for vehicles accessing the car wash; 5) With respect to grading, proposed elevations north of the building and at the end of the turning radius are too high relative to the retaining wall on the adjoining property. Comments indicate that the existing retaining wall should not support additional fill; erosion control is of concem due to slopes; guard rails may be needed due to the steep drop and further engineering review is needed for grading; 6) NYSDOT approval is needed and the plan modified per DOT review; and 7) The dedication of 231 square feet at the intersection (Factory/Main) is noted, but NYSDOT input is requested to ensure that the dedicated area is sufficient to permit adequate radius and design changes. The Town Engineer also found the Dunn Engineering traffic assessment to be adequate. • Southold Transportation Commission letter dated November 27, 2007 This updates the prior Commission letter with a recommendation for approval subject to scenic quality being addressed through landscaping and building design. It is noted that the applicant addressed the Town Engineer comments in a letter dated December 12, 2007 with 3 plan revisions: 1) Drainage calculations/design are changed to address all site generated runoff and to prohibit excess runoff from entering Factory Avenue; 2) The 4 foot pavement to property line setback is now provided; and 3) Trees have been added to the plan to compensate for removal of large trees at the north property line. ZBA VARIANCES The proposed project requires three variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), specifically, a side yard setback variance for the building (15' where 25' is required), a front yard setback variance due to the canopy (8.33' where previous relief was given to 11.5') and an increase in size of the canopy above the 60 linear foot limit of frontage on one street to allow a 67' structure. The ZBA is also considering a Special Exception for the car wash use. Page 4 • Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 SEQRA STATUS The Planning Board conducted a coordinated review for lead agency commencing on September 11, 2007. The action was classified as an Unlisted Action, and the Planning Board assumed lead agency for SEQRA review of the project on October 15, 2007. A SEQRA Determination of Significance should be issued once the Planning Board determines that there is sufficient information to render a determination. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES There are no designated tidal or freshwater wetlands within approximately 1,500 feet of the property. The entire property is already developed with the gas station and parking lot. The underlying soil according to the Suffolk County Soil Survey (Warner, 1975) is identified as CuB - Cut and Fill, gently sloping. Any development constraints were mitigated during the original construction of the gas station, therefore no significant impact on soils and topography are anticipated. The site is an existing gasoline filling station with underground tanks for fuel storage. A review of the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) Distribution Maps from 2007 indicates that there are two water mains near the subject property: the first is located along Main Road and the second along Factory Avenue. The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the USGS Water Resources Investigation Report 2000. The topographic elevation of the property is approximately 25 feet above msl, based on the USGS Topographic Quadrangle for the area. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 22 feet. The subject property is located south of the north fork groundwater divide. The direction of groundwater flow is expected to be horizontal and to the south towards James Creek and Peconic Bay. The site is in an area of archaeological sensitivity according to the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation maps, but has been subject to substantial disturbance as a result of prior development and therefore is not expected to yield cultural artifacts. No other significant natural resources were encountered as the site is current a developed gas station. Page 5 ' Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07299 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS The site is zoned B (General Business) and is surrounded by businesses fronting Route 25 in this area of the site. Diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest is R40 zoning and residences fronting Factory Avenue. The site is an existing gas station with 3 repair bays and an office which sells some convenience items; 2 pump islands are located beneath an existing canopy, There are currently 2 curb cuts on Main Road and 1 curb cut on Factory Avenue; with the west Main Road curb cut and the Factory Avenue curb cut located close to the Main/Factory intersection. Vegetation north of the building provides some screening and green between the shopping center and service station; however, it is noted that most of the existing landscaping is sparse and not well maintained. The proposed project will remove the service bays, expand the convenience store, add a car wash to the back of the building and maintain the existing pump islands under a new enlarged canopy. There is an improvement to curb cuts on Route 25 by removing the west curb cut, and only allowing rights-in, rights-out for the east curb cut. Along Factory Avenue, a full ingress/egress of 30 feet in width is proposed farther north than the existing curb cut; however, a separate 15 foot car wash ingress is added. Factory Avenue is a heavily used connector road between CR 48 and Main Road. In addition, a boat storage facility which involves trailer transport movements is located directly opposite the new ingress for the car wash and near the relocated driveway access and trucks entering the shopping center to the north and east often "stack" along the east side of Factory Avenue before entering the shopping center. The proposed action requires three (3) dimensional variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals, as well as a Special Permit to permit a car wash use on the property. Other involved transportation approvals include the NYSDOT for curb cuts on State Route 25, and a curb cut modification on the Town controlled Factory Avenue. The SCDHS must approve tank storage and facilities for storage and handling of toxic and hazardous materials (Article 12) and must approve sanitary facilities under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. There is significant concern with respect to intensification of the use of the site, particularly in view of its location at a busy intersection with various levels of vehicle movement caused by conditions and uses in proximity to the subject site. The Planning Board seeks a thorough review of potential impacts, available mitigation and alternatives in order to conduct site plan review and coordinate with other involved agencies. POTENTIAL IMPACTS A Part 2 Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) has been completed for the proposed action and is included as an Attachment. Several items were identified as potential impacts and are Page6 Warex,Mattituek Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 tentatively indicated as Small to Moderate Impact; however, further information may be needed to finalize this category and ensure that no adverse environmental impacts will occur. Further discussion is provided below: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? The project has water use considerations; car wash water reclamation is proposed; the project involves dispensing of gas using underground storage tanks. The Town Engineer requested information concerning SCDHS tank permits and identification of existing and proposed tanks on the site. No additional information was provided to NP&V. SCWA indicated that there may be extraordinary water tap requirements associated with this project. It is noted that the project will receive water from SCWA, and the Authority has indicated that water can be supplied to the site. Additional water tap requirements may depend upon the car wash facility, since the convenience store and gas station have relatively low water supply demand. The site is 0.55 acres in size and has an allowable flow of 330 GPD, with an expected design flow of 81 GPD indicating low water use and discharge. Reclamation of car wash water is proposed which will reduce water demand. SCDHS review is required under Article 6 for density, and Article 12 for tank storage. The gas station currently exists and must have tanks registered under Article 12. SCDHS applications should be filed for facilities on the site and for site plan approval of the sanitary systems and flow. SCWA should be contacted for water supply availability and approvals. Agency coordination will assist in assessing potential impacts. 6 Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water rungft? Grading, a neighboring retaining wall and the intervening fill and slopes between the north property line and the project site may result in erosion. Comments by the Town Engineer expressed concern with respect to grading and the transition to the neighboring property near the north property line. No additional information was provided to NP&V. The bottom of curb height of 24.63 feet, and the top of wall height of 21.92 feet indicates a vertical change of 2.71 feet over a 4 foot distance, or a slope of 681/6. Potential erosion toward the neighboring property needs to be adequately addressed to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer. Grading, drainage and erosion control must be evaluated and mitigated. 11. 1I ill Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? Route 25 is a Designated New York State Scenic Byway; landscaping and building design should consider aesthetics. The site is in proximity to residential uses diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest. A rendering of the new building has been provided and the landscape plan reviewed. The architectural design appears to be a substantial improvement based on the new canopy design as compared to the existing canopy. The sloped roof and shingle treatment is an improvement over the current canopy. The building will remain much the same but will be architecturally enhanced. Site landscaping will be coordinated and much improved over current conditions. The plant materials include trees where space permits and will use deciduous as well as coniferous trees. Other areas will be enhanced with groundcover vegetation and flowering plants. The reduction of a curb cut on Route 25, and replacement with a right-in, right-out configuration that permits a landscape triangle will also be an improvement; however, an additional curb cut will be added to Factory Avenue. There are residential homes diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest. Trees on the north part of the site will be removed and will reduce aesthetics and screening with Page 7 • Warea, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 limited area for replanting of landscape vegetation. Installation of benches in a landscape setting along Route 25 is viewed as an improvement over existing conditions; however, the aesthetics of this site development with respect to the Route 25 scenic by-way is an important consideration for evaluation and appropriate mitigation. 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? There is potential impact to Factory Avenue and the State Route 25 intersection due to car wash access and gas/convenience store vehicle movements. In addition, there is a boat storage facility which involves trailer movements at a yard directly west of the proposed new car wash access. Truck stacking associated with the shopping center along Factory Avenue is also a concern. The area is also subject to seasonal traffic fluctuations which increase trip generation to the area and complicate lraffic flow and interaction. Movement of traffic within the site, and on Factory Avenue and the State Route 25 intersection adjoining the site, is of concern. The turning radius for the car wash was identified as an issue by the Town Engineer. The end of the turn at the point where vehicles maneuver to enter the self- service car wash building opening seems problematic, particularly for larger SW/van vehicles. If a vehicle cannot enter the building, the ensuing backup and logistics of correction of the situation could be very problematic. The separate self-service car wash entrance is understandable as not all patrons of the gas station will wash their cars. However, an additional curb cut for entrance and the need for those who do obtain gas or convenience items to exit, then re-enter the site is not optimum. There is potential traffic generation, flow and safety impacts to Factory Avenue and the Factory Avenue and State Route 25 (Main Road) intersection due to car wash access and gas/convenience store vehicle movements; the proximity of the project in relation to the shopping center to the north; the retail and storage uses to the west and the retail uses to the south of the proposed project complicate vehicle movements in this area. The parcel is located on the northeast comer of the Factory Avenue and State Route 25 intersection adjacent to the largest shopping center in the Hamlet of Mattituck. Tenants of the shopping center include a large grocery store (anchor), several restaurants and retail uses and the Town's only movie theater. One of the ingress and egress points of this shopping center is located on Factory Avenue; this access offers the only traffic light controlled intersection available to users of the shopping center. The project proposes two ingress and one egress on Factory Avenue located between the shopping center access and the S.R 25/ Factory Avenue intersection. There is a situation where trucks stack along the east side of Factory Avenue to access the shopping center driveway to the north of the subject site. In addition, there is a boat storage facility which involves trailer movements at a yard directly west of the proposed new car wash access. There are also concerns with respect to the Magic Fountain ice cream store located opposite the site at the northwest comer of Main Road and Factory Avenue due to high levels of seasonal activity, as well as routine activity at this location, particularly due to the uncontrolled curb cuts existing at Main Road and Factory Avenue for this use. The area is also subject to seasonal traffic fluctuations which increase trip generation to the area and complicate traffic flow and interaction. These concerns, together with potential stacking issues due to the tight radius noted above, and vehicle movements do warrant further evaluation. In addition, Planning staff indicates that personal communication with the police department indicates that 61 accidents were recorded at Page 8 ' Wargz,Matiltuck Environmental Planning Revkw NP&V No. 07298 the Factory/Main Road intersection in the past five years. As a result, car wash turning radius, vehicle stacking and movements within the site and toward the new car wash entrance warrant further evaluation and mitigation to the satisfaction of the Planning Board. 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? The project will introduce a new activity, specifically the car wash, near residential use and zoning and will remove screening vegetation. The proposed action will result in a new activity in the north part of the site, not far from existing residential zoning (R40) and an existing residence diagonally across Factory Avenue from the northwest comer of the site. It is noted that residences along Factory Avenue in this area, are situated near Factory Avenue, and across from a parking lot for a commercial center which also has an access farther north on Factory Avenue. In addition, the southernmost residence adjoins a boat storage facility. As a result, the dominant source of noise is expected to be Factory Avenue, with other levels of activity present along this segment of road. The relative impact of adding a curb cut in an active area, removal of existing trees that provide screening and and possible attenuation with limited area for reinstallation of landscaping is a noted impact. The hours of operation and noise%dors associated with the facility warrant further evaluation. 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Safety related to pedestrian movements in the vicinity of the site due to traffic congestion and intensification ofsite use. The project will add to intensification of site use and resultant congestion in an area subject to truck traffic and stacking, boat storage and hauling and activity at the Magic Fountain ice cream shop, in addition to traffic activity already associated with Factory Avenue, Main Road and the intersection. Pedestrian movement and safety due to this congestion and reported accidents should be examined. 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Additional car wash access is in proximity to residential zoning and use and will remove vegetation which may provide screening from commercial activities. The project site is zoned B (General Business) and the site is currently occupied by a gas station and 3 service bays. The proposed project will result in certain aesthetic improvements to the site including architecture of the canopy and a coordinated landscape plan. The convenience store will result in some increase in use intensity but the facility currently does provide some convenience goods to patrons. The site plan provides parking for the convenience store and queuing for the gas station, a dumpster location (which is improved over current conditions), as well as improved access and reduction in curb cuts on Route 25. The gas station and convenience store do not represent a concern. The car wash is a self-service type that does involve less activity than a full car wash; however, concern over queuing, turning radius and potential impact on Factory Avenue expressed above remain a concern that should be addressed. The overall intensification of the site use is of concern. The combination of a car wash, gas station and convenience store, on a small site in proximity to an active intersection with other vehicle and truck movements will exacerbate the current level of congestion and activity. The proximity to residences and intensification of site use including the removal of trees and added car wash activity, coupled with the additional curb cut on Factory Avenue is expected to change the character of the community. Page 9 • Warex,Mattitack Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION This document addresses information available to date and offers consideration of potential impacts of the project in the context of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The Part 1 EAF was reviewed and a Part 2 EAF has been completed and attached. Further evaluation of the issues identified in the Part 2 EAF indicate that potential impacts are potentially large. The Planning Board feels that additional information is warranted in order to evaluate impacts, mitigation and alternatives, and the Board also finds that coordination with other involved agencies through SEQRA would be beneficial for project review. These issues are summarized as follows: Water Resources The project has water use considerations; car wash water reclamation is proposed; the project involves dispensing of gas using underground storage tanks. Grading, a neighboring retaining wall and the intervening fill and slopes between the north property line and the project site may result in erosion. Transportation and Safety There is potential impact to Factory Avenue and the intersection of State Route 25 due to car wash access and gas/convenience store vehicle movements. In addition, there is a boat storage facility which involves trailer movements at a yard directly west of the proposed new car wash access. The Magic Fountain ice cream store located across Factory Avenue, opposite the site, is cause for concern due to high levels of seasonal activity, and particularly due to the uncontrolled curb cuts existing at Main Road and Factory Avenue for this use. Truck stacking along Factory Avenue is also a concern, as is the seasonal increase in traffic. Safety related to pedestrian movements in the vicinity of the site due to traffic congestion and intensification of site use is also an issue. Noise and Odors The project will introduce a new activity, specifically the car wash, near residential use and zoning and will remove existing screening vegetation. Community Character and Aesthetics Route 25 is a Designated New York State Scenic Byway; landscaping and building design should consider aesthetics. The site is in proximity to residential uses diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Additional car wash access is in proximity to residential zoning and use and will remove vegetation which may provide screening from commercial activities. If during the course of review the Planning Board identifies one or more potential significant adverse impacts, then a Positive Declaration is required and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement must be prepared. The review contained herein has identified a number of potential significant adverse impacts and as a result, the preparation of a DEIS is appropriate. A DEIS will also allow the Planning Board to more thoroughly evaluate necessary mitigation measures and possible alternatives to the proposed action that may reduce anticipated impacts. Page 10 Dunn Engineering Assoles, P.C. Coesulft Eneinem 86 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y.11978 831.289.2480 831-288.2544 Fax November 2, 2007 ,IF} l5 D „3 NOV ` 7 2007 ! i Mr. Vivian Kamath 8 so iirold town i DSC Construction Corp. pannl Board J j. 640 Sunrise Highway 6West Babylon, NY 11704 - - y Re: Traffic Engineering Assessment Proposed Car Wash Addition N/e comer NYS Rte. 25 Mattituck, NY Dear Mr. Kamath: As requested, Dunn Engineering Associates PC has completed our professional traffic engineering evaluation in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the existing gasoline station, located on the northeast comer of Main Road (NYS Route25) at Factory Avenue, in Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The project envisions the expansion of the existing convenience store and addition of an automatic car wash to the gasoline station. Figure 1 shows the location of the project site and Figure 2 shows the boundaries of the property and the adjacent roadway network. Our examination was performed to evaluate the potential traffic impact of the proposed development, including trip generation, access, roadway capacity and safety. During the course of the study, the following specific work tasks were performed: 1. Several personal visits to the site to attest to our observations of existing traffic movements at various times of the day and under different conditions. 2. Collection and analysis of existing traffic data as available from the Town of Southold, New York State Department of Transportation and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates. 3. Estimates of the additional traffic that will be generated by the proposed project. These estimates were based on information provided in the latest (7) edition of the report Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. A~ j ~~~yyy r t F t r 1 , w 0- VVI t~ s ~Yy p s to qp L ,'r>1 t w l" /1101 wi~ g~. ~ S 1 ~ 1 ? ~ ~lj~. rn dy t 14 O Is, fx +t YL~ .h r ~O 144 ~~pp e St, 0 As ~ ~r a `L ! fin, ~.,,ti t Y DLJNN P SITE MAP ASSOCIATES, P.C. 66 Mw SbW Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 4 4. Examination of the ability of the street network to accommodate the additional volumes that will be generated by the proposed use. Intersection capacity analyses was performed at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue and Factory Avenue at the site access driveway for the following scenarios: a. 2008 No-Build Traffic b. 2008 Build Traffic 5. Examination of access to and from the site and the parking area from the standpoint of location and design. 6. Evaluation of the geometric features of the proposed queue storage area. 7. Preparation of a letter report setting forth our findings and conclusions. The following sections present the results of our efforts in this regard. Existing Conditions As previously stated, the site is located on the northeast corner of NYS Route 25, Main Road, at Factory Avenue, in Mattituck. The gas station is surrounded on two sides by a shopping center. At present, the site contains a gas station with eight fueling stations, two service bays that are currently unused, and a small convenience store. The site has access to both NYS Route 25 and to Factory Avenue. There is one existing driveway on Factory Avenue and two on Main Road. In order to determine the amount of traffic being generated by the existing use of the site, traffic counts were performed at the three existing site driveways during the weekday 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM peak periods, and during the Saturday Midday peak period. The results of these traffic counts are presented in Table 1. As can be seen, the weekday AM peak hour occurs between 7:00 an 8:00 AM, when 28 vehicles entered the site and 30 vehicles left the site, and the weekday PM peak hour occurred between 4:00 and 5:00 PM, when 32 vehicles entered the site and 33 left the site. On Saturday, 53 vehicles entered the site and 46 vehicles left the site during the peak hour, which occurred between 1:00 and 2:00 PM. De~i`ttt$iltit r+ Existing Gas Station Traffic 28 L30 38 34 53 46 Table 1 Site Generated Traffic Existing Gas Station with Convenience Store Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 5 Main Road is a New York State highway facility that provides direct access to the site. Although NYS Route 25 extends the entire length of Long Island, it serves as Main Street for many of the communities along the north fork of Long Island, including Mattituck. Near the site of the proposed development, Main Road provides one lane in each direction, flanked by shoulders, with additional turning lanes at major intersections. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Development along Main Road near the site is primarily commercial. According to information provided by New York State Department of Transportation, the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) on Main Road in Mattituck in 2004 was 12849 vehicles per day. Note that AADT is a transportation engineering and planning term defined as the average traffic volume at a given location on any day of the year, including weekends, and is not utilized in detailed analyses. The intersection of NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue is controlled by a traffic signal that is maintained by NYSDOT. This signal also controls the northbound approach of Sigsbee Avenue, which is off-set to the west from Factory Avenue. Factory Avenue forms an acute angle with Maine Road, as it is skewed to the northeast. The very tight turning radius presents difficulties for vehicles turning from westbound Main Road onto northbound Factory Avenue, particularly trucks. Future Site Trip Generation The current site plan for the proposed development envisions the expansion of the existing small convenience store, and the addition of an automated car wash to the site. The eight fueling stations will be retained, and the service bays will be removed. Information contained in the report "Trip Generation", 7'" Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, was consulted to estimate the number of new trips expected to be generated by the proposed project. Under Land Use ar~-- ode_ Automated Car Wash, the ITE report presents data on trip making characteristics for a stand-alone car wash. Automated car washes are defined in the ITE report as "facilities that allow for the mechanical cleaning of the exterior of vehicles". Although, some of the sites in the ITE report Rrovided auto detailing and other related serviFeg~2M exterior cleaning is nosed at the site. o vacuuming cleastittg services are to be provides The information in the report indicates that a car was oRE e R7e proposea_un_der tst~might be expected to generate 18 / new trips (9 entering and 9 exiting) during the weekday PM peak hour, and 22 new trips (11 entering S / nd l 1 exiting) during the Saturday _Midday .peak hour. However, the information in the report is HEPJ14 based on studies conducted atcdkQrtwnc the user is cautioned in its use due to the Lf y small sample size. In addition, no information is provid As to trip generation at car washes during Z' thew ee ay pe out. ort also provides dat a aiding trip making at gas stations with convenience stores and car washes, under Land Us ode 946 asoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car y Wash. Once a _ T gain, under this Land Use Code, a'fais-resented for the Saturday peak hoar, 5 Therefore, it has been estimated for the purposes of this report that the new p 7g 114.-,) during the Saturday midday peak hour wtl a propo Iona o e mcrease m lops during the other 74 b/ ~-peak hour analyzed for this report. Based on this information, all the combined future uses on the •0 - Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 6 site would generate a total of 98 trips during the weekday AM peak hour, and 110 trips during the weekday PM peak hour. This represents an increase of 40 new trips in the AM and 38 during the weekday PM above the existing traffic. On Saturdayhis methodoloresults in a total of trips, 32 entering and 28 exi in which is considerably higher than the ITE report predicts that a new standalone automated car wash would generate, and is in fact greater than anew full service car wash s eprld generat It must be note~hat r information provided by the applicant regarding automated car r, k tsl ies indicted that the number of washes at automated car washes i e weed and 50% of full.,- service car washes. Therefore, use of this methodoloev results in an extremely conservative estimate of the traffic expected to be generated by the site. It should also be noted that not all the traffic visiting the car wash would be new traffic added to the roadway network. Rather, it is likely that some portion of the traffic would already be on a roadwaynetwnrk for another purpose, and will JJ visit the car wash as part oft at multi u ose tri . owever, for the purposes of this report, it has been assumed that all the tra ic'visiting-thc proposed car wash would be new traffic, thereby ('~uppoing a. conservative worst-case evalugij~n. This trip generation information is presented in ' e 1 Table 2. 4 The site-generated traffic was then( distributed on the new driveway configuration ,,And on the roadway network It has been assumed that the new site generated-traffic will have origins and destinations similar to the traffic already visiting the site. Note that the existing gas station traffic, was also redistributed on the roadway network to reflect the new driveway configuration. rF: f1 ,N 6 U.- Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car Wash 50 48 55 55 N/A N/A LUC 946 Less Existing Gas Station Traffic 28 30 38 34 53 46 Total New Site Generated Traffic 22 18 17 21 32« 28« " Assumed number of new trips. See text for explanation. Table 2 Site Generated Traff ic Gas Station with Convenience Store and Car Wash Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 7 Access Examination As stated, there are currently three driveways serving the site, two on Main Road and one on Factory Avenue. The westerly driveway on Main Road is located less than 25 feet east of Factory Avenue. The driveway on Factory Avenue is located less than 50 feet north of Main Road and less than 20 feet north of the stop line for southbound traffic at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue. In keeping with good access management practices and in conformance with NYSDOT's policy regarding driveways on State highways, th westemmost wa on Main Road will be eliminated. The remaining driveway on Main Road will be configured to allow for right turns on y into andout of the site. Left and right turns into and out of the site will be permitted at the driveway on Factory Avenue. Note also that car wash patrons will have access only to Factory Avenue and no internal access to the car wash will be possible from the fueling area. L While this driveway configuration is not considered ideal, the access design reflects the desire on the part of the Town of Southold that no access to the car wash be provided from the State highway due j k 1G`> to concerns regarding potential queues on Main Road. Due to the low volume of traffic expected to be generated by the car wash, such queues are considered unlikely, however, the access configuration shown on the site is considered more desirable by the Town. Patrons leaving the fueling areawill be P1 Ile d7ected by on-site signing to access the car wash by turning onto Factory Avenue from Main Road. C, V Z," Finally, note thal, as r~ ~tPd by +h~rnw`n _the applicant has attempted to obtain access to the 'V parking lot of the adjacent shopping center property. cfGvever, the owner of that property.is unwilling to provide access at this timLffhe applicant remains willing to enter intoa cross access' agreement with the adjacent property owner. Intersection Capacity Analyses In order to ensure t h a t the proposed project will no ve any detrimental impact on operating cmditinae-on the roadway network, and to ensure that the site driveways will operate in a safe and efficient manner, without undue delay for vehicles entering and leaving the proposed development, signalized and unsignalized intersection capacity analyses have been performed. These capacity analyses were performed utilizing software based on the methodologies set forth in the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, and utilized the traffic volumes described above, adjusted to reflect peak summer season, and the estimates of new vehicles expected to be generated by the proposed development, and also reflect the traffic generated by the new CVS drugstore on the southwest comer of Main Road at Factory Avenue. The results of these capacity analyses indicate that excellent levels of service can be expected to prevail at the driveway, and that no undue delays to vehicles traveling on Factory Avenue will occur. In addition, the low volumes new traffic generated by the project will have minimal impact on operating conditions at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue, and no deterioration in the levels of service at this intersection will occur during the three peak hours examined. During the weekday AM peak, the intersection will function at LOS C, and no deterioration in LOS is predicted due to the proposed project. Similarly, Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 8 during the weekday PM and Saturday peak, LOS D is predicted and again no changes occur due to the proposed project. Note that these capacity analyses have been prepared using the extremely conservative worst case projections for site generated traffic for the proposed site. Copies of the results of these intersection capacity analyses are attached. Turning Radius Improvement As previously stated, the turning radius for westbound Main Road to northbound Factory Avenue is JSlimited due to the alignment of Factory Avenue. Vehicles have been observed experiencing difficulty in executing this movement, especially when southbound left turning vehicles are queued try at the stop line on Factory Avenue. It is highly recommended that this existing turning radius deficiency be improved. 11 ry In order to assist the Town of Southold and/or NYSDOT in improving this existing deficiency, the f Applicant is willing to de ate property on the northeast comer.of thesiteso_tW. a larger turning ^radius can be installe The approximate area of this dedication is shown on the site plan. j Car Wash Queue n; r5 The site plan shows queuing storage for eleven vehicles on-site. Based on wai( time of three %inutcs per vehrcl d queuing for eleven vehicles 31 vehicles per hour can he nmreaw or stored The conservative stimates of site-generated traffic prepared for this study indicate that a max imam of t v r...ia~ „M hn„r would visit the car wsstrjhus, more than sufficient queue storage space is available to ensure that all vehicles waiting to use the car wash could be stored on the site, and no vehicles would need to wait on Factory Avenue to access the car wash. Conclusions Although the site will generate additional traffic, this traffic can be adequately accommodated by the existing roadway network. 2. Intersection capacity analyses performed in accordance with the methodology set forth in the 2000 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual indicate that the additional traffic generated by the proposed development will have minimal impact on operations at the signalized intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue. 3. In keeping with good access management practices, the site plan for the project proposes a single driveway on Main Road and two driveways on Factory Avenue. One existing driveway on Main w Road will be closed. 4. The access driveways will operate in a safe and efficient manner, without causing undue delays. 5. The applicant remains willing to enter into a cross access arrangement with the adjacent shopping center property, at such time as the property owner would be willing to provide cross access. Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 9 6. More than sufficient queue storage will be available on the site so that no vehicles will need to wait on Factory Avertue to access the car wash. 7. The applicant is willing to dedicate property on the northeast comer of Factory Avenue at Main Road to facilitate the improvement of the existing turning radius deficiency at that location. In light of the foregoing, and based on professional transportation engineering considerations, it is recommended that the proposed project be approved. If you have any questions or need any further information, please call me. Sincer y, i V' cent Corrado, P.E. Associate Engineer VC:as L207329 P26069 Attachments General Information i, Site Information Main Rd'C Analyst VC ANY) Rd'C Agency ency or Co. DEA A Date Performed 10-'30'07 rea Type All o areas Time Period Weekday AM Peak Hour Jurisdiction Town n of f Southold, NYSDOT Analysis Ycar 2008 No Eluild (SessAdjust) Project ID Cityo Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH J RT LT TH RT LT J TH RT LT TH _RT Dumber of lanes, N, ~1 0 1 1 0 J 0 1 1 0 1 1 _aneyroup I L TR J L _.J 1R IJ LT R L7 _R /ofume, V (vPh) 53 654 I 12 J 18 751 30 _I 24 J-12 18 49 10 88 Heavy vehicles, °6HV 4 J 2 J 2' _4 2_j 2 J 2_ 2 2 2 2- 'eak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.9,3 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 10.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 J---J_9 I. 'retimed (P) or actuated (A) I A l P P P J_ P P A J A A A A Bart-up lost time, I, 2.0 J 2.0J 20 2.0 ~j 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 :xtension of effective green, e 37 +4.1 44 4-1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 ,frivol type, AT 13 3 3 3 3 3 3 Init extension, UE 13.0 3_0 3.0 l 3.0 3.0 3.0 t3. 0 3.0 illering/metering, I L000 1000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 1.000 filial unmet demand, Ob 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 ed / Bike I RTOR volurnes p J0 p 0 20 ane width 11.0 12.0 10.0_] 11 5 10.0 10.0 0 10.0 arking / Grade / Parking 0 N N J O N J N J 0 N N 0 N arking maneuvers, Na, J l~ J_ uses stopping, Ne 0 J 0 0 _ot 0 0 0 in. time for pedestrians, GP I 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 hosing G 13 6.8 1y G = I_ 03 Y - 04 Y SS O9 1y Y NB O6nly y - 07 V - 08 ming 369 G Y= 5.7 Y- 6.1 = uration of Analysis, T = 0.25- J Cycle Length, C = 80.0 ane't3Mup t}ajoa~~~y, ContYdl Dela_y,-and LOS Da?emlinsNon ! i. r EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Jjusled flow rate, v _ 57 71 fi 19 843 J 39 16 64 73 me group capacity, c 182 1174 313 872 158 139 188 166 ratio, X 0.31 0.61 _J 0.06 0.97 J 0.25 0.12 0.34 0.44 dal green ratio, 9/C 0-11 0.64 10.49 0.49 J 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.11 Aorm delay, dr 33.1 8.4 10.8 19.9 336 33.2 32.8 33.1 egression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1- 1.000 1000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ,lay calibration, k 0.11 0,50 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 ;remental delay, d. _ 1.0 2.4 J J 0.4 J 23.4 _]78R] 0.4 1_1 J 1.9 _ II I I tial queue delay, (13 J-- J-- I-----~-- -.-I- J J~ mtrol delay 34.0 107 J 112 43.3 I J-~ J 34.4 33.6 33.8 35.0+ ne yroup LOS i J B I 17 C ~ C ~ D preach delay 124. 42.6.._._----_--_-- 34.2 34.5 proach LOS R D C C - - - - - - _ L _ --f-- ersection delay "29.0 Intersection LOS C I1 I, h.. 1 I R.. y., ..I DUNN ENGINEEtRINOASSOCIATES 66 MAIN STREET; WESTHAMPTON 9EACN, NEW YORK 11978 FILE NAME: TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY INTERSECTION : MAIN ROAD.(NYS ROUTE 25 AT SIGSBEE ROAD) FACTORY AVENUE TIME PERIOD: AM EXISTING YEAR: 2006 HORIZON YEAR: 2008 DONE BY: DEAIVC APPROACH ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES y a Ab, x~° Klk-'i ~•Y~ ~~'Sx~i ~ 'k''. ~ ~6 Y. y,'R".~'". I4~.4yi .:~R 'Xt:~f,k 1I ITION L t RWM > ~3 t {i L: a L T*)A• DEC. 2006 EXISTING 9 6 13 34 5 64 38 463 5 11 545 22 r v a v fi a z W~EIt)} sEs4NnL F r' ~r 5 55 r ' % Y AD ~USttulENt f ACTQIi 1~2 6 a7 A R ¢ f :~A v IMt2 n Sc t u ~S ' t 3 33.00 a'F Ywx r At r }ty,5 ' 4~ i . A n ,r<~r ' ' 1 aye az ''p~gy~ 46 f ~ ~t`hCt 4, i~ ~ r~ • ,n~b" 'A F vwt~ F bh, rr 1, 2.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENTS 1) CVS Pharmacy 12 4 0 2 3 0 0 13 5 2 0 0 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 srirn rrpt- 12 4 0 2 3 0 0 y" 13 5 2 0 0 ~ y ~ f Y M ~4't( J T4 F ONA. Y`A ~ +~1 7 lp~° P ~r Ae 'ty w e 1;~'eT ~~4 ~ t • 1 , M F . IL, ~ F, 4 C. .Lt?.~ '",a~ } r. i ~ 4 _~'kn~# yl 31TE TRAFFIC Add Car Wash 9' 1 0 7 0 7 9' 0 0' 0 3 8 f PASS BY;CREDIT 4 :U x r Q= y[.0 Y r+ U' , .11 w 0 x x 0 ip n, t r ti n ,Yf I 4A 0 ff.N 7`e" : F a4 F.. ury 4 a'~•_. w:..~ 04 1 r ~k F s .qJi '~§ai'§~ l r F a~`YS>~ ~ +~+n€ 1 p t r:' BUILP.'TRXIFFIC . 33 13 18 10 95 62 155 12 f8 38 WWI 111, .1) ii-POH~ General Inlurma,,wi Site Information Main Rd & Analyst Intr•.rsechon SigsbeeRd'FactoryAve Agency or Area Type All other areas Time Tate Performed Go. riod Weekday DE A 103007 ky AM Peak How Jurisdiction Town Of Southold, NYSOOT cAda Analysis Year 2008 Build (SeasAdjust) Project ID Citgo Volume and riming input EB WB NB SB LT 1H RT LT TH RT LT _TTH RT LT TH__]_RT lumber of lanes, N, _ I 1_ J 0 1 1 0 0 1 _ 1 0 1 1 ane group I L J TR J L TR LT R LT R_ /olume, V (vph) 62 _ J 654 12 J 18 J 757 38 33 __13 17 56 10 95 h Heavy vehicles, °aHV _I q I p 12 _ q 2 p I- p p 12 2, 2 'eak-hour !actor, PFIF 0.93 J 0_93 J 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0-.9.3 I-~ 0.93 Q93 'relimed (P) or actuated (A) I A P P P P P J A A A_ J A A ;tart-up lost time, 1, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 _ 2.0 2.0 :xtension of effective green, e - 3.7 4.1 4.1 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 ..rival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 J 3 3 'nit extension, UE 3.0 J 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ,itial unmet demand, Ob 0.0 0.0 J 0.0 0.0 J 0.0 0.0 J 0.0 0.0 ed / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 I 0 0 0 _ 0 3 0 J 20 ane width 111.0 12.0 J 10.0 11.5 10.0 10.0 J 10.0 10.0 arking / Grade / Parking N 1 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N~ 0 J N arking maneuvers, N,,, uses stopping, Na 0 D J p _I 0 ~00 in. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 lasing EB Only EW Perm _ 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 G= 6.8 G= 36.9 G= G= G= 7.1 G= 5.6 G- G= ming JY= 5.7 _]Y= 6.1 Y= Y= Y= 5.9 Y= 5.9 Y= Y= gyration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 ane GroLp Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Deter m?rietJofi t t4 r' EB WB NB SB _ LT TH Hi- LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Ijusted flow rate, v 67 716 19 855 49 15 71 81 me group capacity, c 182 1174 313 870 157 139 188 166 ratio, X 0.37 0.61 0.06 0.98 0.31 0.11 0.38 0.49 dal green ratio, g/C 0.11 0.64 0.49 0.49 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.11 tifonn delay, dr 33.3 8.4 10.8 20.2 33.8 33.2 32.9 33.3 ogression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 J 1.000 1.000 1.!700 1.000 _ - .lay calibration, k 0.11 0.50 0,50 0.50 0.71 0.11 J 0. 1 1 0.11 aemenlal dulay, d., 1.3 2.4 0.4 26.6 1.1 0.3 I J-1.3 2.3._ _-I - - 1 lial queue delay, d,t . mtroldelay 34.5 10.7 11.2 46.8 35.0- 1335 444.2 35.6 ire group LOS C -B - B - --0 C C C D proach delay 12.8 46.0 34.6 34.9 proach LOS B_-. D - C - - - C-- - - JI w;ection delay 3o R Intersection LOS C y r. Y 4 1 E t i i _ l ^ 1 Y. 1?:jy^ - J 1 4 ' K`'I X97$ r c s taw. S„F H w,.a ,1 .:1' '~'4 .t x ^dn3 FILE NAME: RM TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY INTERSECTION : MAIN ROAD' YS'R , " T. IZaS sROAP./ FACTORY AVENUE TIME PERIOD: EXISTING YEAR: 2Q46 HORIZON YEAR: 08 DONE BY: DEAIy.i APPROACH ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES And , , sslr, til , 1 ' ? a N rX' .u a t 1 P ~ RyyA J Y£ i 77 DEC. 2006 EXISTING 7 9 14 82 12 68 69 654 14 11 567 16 ~(1=E~A~ ~ a`~~~F r't'e ~N'~ r '4r As ~.pw .'°i: hrf S P M1 f , i'• ~.;.4 ~ 1`r ADJUS T F~Hy 33.00 R 1 2.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENTS 1) CVS Pharmacy 26 8 0 4 4 0 0 18 8 3 0 0 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 un ki 26 8 0 4 4 0 0 18 8 3 0 0 •'-Ths SITE TRAFFIC Add Car Wish 1 9 7 10 3 6 0 "f}UILD '~F3AFPIC{ f ~?P~3~ ; g h~~g 1+~ 29 General Information J :5ira Information Analyst VC I nlen;oclion MainRd& Agency or Co. VC SigsbeeRd Factop,Avo Agee Performed 10DEA /30,'07 Area Type All other areas Time Period Weekday PM Peak Hour Jurisdiction Town of Southold.NYSDOI Analysis Year 2008 No Build (Snas4djusr) Project ID Citgo Volume and Timing Input EB_ WB NB SB I _J _ LT J TH J RT Ll _ J TH _ RT _ LT _ TH RT LT - TFI RT ,lumber of lanes, NT I 1 a 0 1_ J 1_{- 0 0 1 10 1 J 1_ ane group - J L TR J-J L J TR LT R l- LT H /olumc, V (vPh) 94 905 27 18 769 21 35 20 19 115 20 92 Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 4 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 'eak-hour factor, PHF , 0.83 0.88. 0.88 0_88 J 0.88 J 0.88 J 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 J 0.88 0.88 'retimed (P) or actuated (A) ` A I p p p p n A A q I I ' ~ I q tart-up lost time, 1, Z.0 J 2.0 20 -J-J 2.0 2.0 2.0 Jl~J 2..0 JI 2.0 xtension of effective green, e 13.7 4.1 4.1 4,1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 .rrival type. AT J 3 { 3 J 3 J 3 33_ 3 3 (nit extension, LIE 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 iltering/metering, 1 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 iitial unmet demand, Ob 10.0 J O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ J 00 J 0.0 ed / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 10 0 J 0 J 3 J- 0 J- 20 ane width 111.0 J I20 J 10-0 JJ 11.5 _J 10.0 J 100--_l 10.0 110.0 arking / Grade / Parking I_ N3 p I N { N~ 0 N~- N 0 J_ N Al J 0 J-h/ arking maneuvers, N. J- - J 0-I-_J~ J- _ 0 -I-1J 0 1 0 uses stopping, Na 0 3 0 0 J J in. time for pedetEBOWly , G 3.2 I 3.2 3.2 3.2 easing EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 077 D8 GG= 37.9 G- G- G= 7.9 G= 5.6 G= G= ming Y = 5.7 Y 6.1 Y- Y- Y- 5.9 ~ = Y= 5.9 Y= -3Y= .iration of Analysis, T - 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 80.0 ?~e: rg +CO?b~ry,ana[)_!)De! minarro~, EB WB NB _ SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH FIT LT TH RT (lusted flow rate, v 107 1059 20 898 63 18 J 154 82 ine group capacity, c 143 1153 - J 90 J 895 158 139 204 181 ratio, X 0.75 0.92 0.22 1.00 0.40 0.13 _J 0.75 0.45 dal green ratio, g/C 0.08 0.63 0.50 0.50 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.12 dform delay, dt 35.8 12,8 _ 11.3 20.0 34.1 _ J 33.3 33.9 32.6 ogression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1-000 1.000 1,000 fl ay calibration, k 0.30 0.50 0.50 050 0.11 0.11 0,31 0.11 :rementaldelay, d2 19.4 13.0 J 5.6.- J 30,9 1.7 6.4-_I -148 ..I 1.8 teal queue delay, d3 ~J.--- - J .I_. - J-._. ---J-- - ,nlroldelay 55.2 25_8 .16.9- 50.9_.J 35.8 J 33.7 J 48.734.4 no group LOS - E C J -J B j D J---J-J 0 J C = _0 1 preach delay 28.5 50.2 35-3---- J 43.8 proach LOS C E) { U I D rseclion delay 38,5 J 1 Intersection LO' { D ~ i,;.•i n„~„ni,., .inn i~-v...::d ii: 'UUU-ll fAILE0 iEPUitF GenerallnJormation ~ Site Information Analyst VC Intersection Main Rd & Si sbeeRd-FactorYAve Date Agency or Performed Co. DEA Area Type Another areas 10;3007 Time Period Weekday PM Peak Hour Jurisdiction Town of Southold,NYSOOT Analysis Year 2008 Build (SeasAdjusl) Project ID Citgo Volume and Tlmi !n ut- . . EB WB NB SB LT TH _ RT LT_J TH _ RT _LT TH RT LT TH RT 4umber of lanes, N, 1 1 0 1 J 1 0 0 1 1 0 J 1 1 _ane group I L TR _ L 1 TR LT R LT R /olume, V (vph) 106 923 28 19 J 787 25 35 21 19 126 21 101 •b Heavy vehicles, iaHV 2 1 2 o 4 2 I a 12 2 2 2 2 leak-hour factor, PHF J 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 II 0.88 0.8-8 J 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 'retimed (P) or actuated (A) I A P _I P P P P A A A A A A Stan-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 .xtension of effective green, e 3.7 4.1 4,1 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 ,oval type, AT 3 3 . J 3 J 3 3 3 3 3 'nit extension, UE 3i0 _ 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 iltering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ntial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 _ J 0.0 0.0 J~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ad / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 -p 10 n 0 I 3 0 20 ane width + 11.0 12.0 10.0 17.5 10.0 100 10.0 10.0 arking / Grade / Parking I N 0 N N J 00NN N 0 N N 0 N arking maneuvers, N,,, I' J I uses stopping, NB I p J 0 In Ill_ 0 - 0 0 in. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 `I 3.2 J 3.2 3.2 P L_ basing EB Only EW Per 03 04 SB Unly NB Only 07 08 G= 5.0 G- 37.9 G= G= G= 79 G- 5.6 G= G= ming . Y= 5.7 Y= 6.1 Y= Y= Y5.9 Y= 5.9 Y= Y= uration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 P. x4 ~F V 4 ~ e ~.YiY _ EB WB NB SB LT TH RT ~LT TH FIT LT TH FIT LT TH RT ijusled flow rate, v 120 1081 22 922 64 18 167 92 me group capacity, c 143 1153 90 895 158 139 204 181 ratio, X 0.84 0.94 0.24 1.03 0.41 0.13 0.82 0.51 )tal green ratio, g/C 0.08 0.63 0.50 0.50 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.12 iiform delay, di _ 36.1 13.2 11.4 20.0 34.1 33.3 342 32.8 egression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 _ 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 :lay calibration, k 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.36 0.12 ;remental delay, d7 33.6 15.2 6.4 38.1 1.7 0.4 _ 22.4 2;4 tial queue delay, d, rntrol delay 69.7 28.4 177 ~_58 1 35.8 33.7 56.6 35.2 ne group LOS E C B E D C 6E D proach delay 32.6 571 _ J 35.4 49.0 ' preach LOS ---E7 D D - - erseclion delay 43.7 Intersection LOS ~ D - f.•p„i Ila -~Ipn 1'.^. uhf,,, 1111 _Ib k, .n.d Vr..u... 1, ? DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES „6$ MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW'YORK 1197$ FILE NAME: SAT TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY INTERSECTION : MAIN ROAD NYS ROUTE 25 ATSIGSOEE O `DIFAGTORY.AVENUE"i TIME PERIOD: SAT EXISTING YEAR: `x..'10@ HORIZON YEAR: 9 DONE BY: IDEANC APPROACH ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES f, OIL, CONbI QOM 1 T L T `G r v r. ! DEC. 2006 EXISTING 10 9 20 93 15 87 80 570 5 21 560 27 SATURDAY SEASONAL ~ ~ . ADJUSTMkNT FACTO(3 1$ 18 ;x 18 2 47.00 rakowA'p PER YPAR i 5 a r ` +1 '~`1 8 7 2.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENTS 1) CVS Pharmacy 34 10 0 5 5 0 0 23 10 4 0 0 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M, InnLAt. 34 10 0 5 5 0 0 23 10 4 0 11FUTURE r a5 - ~1 1'n • f ~f "NbBUILD WITH 50 + 24 '`'~0 , :"Yf}8 s 8 bTHER DEV. . SITE TRAFFIC Add Car Wash 1 11 4 14 12 10 PASS-BY CREDIT W ~ "BUILD"TRAFFIC 50 25 30 t59 28 t97 a 137 wr89"i F36 6$., &2 r_ii__ 2000 . ' DETAILED - REPORT - _ _ _ _I - - general Information _ . Site form0on analyst VC Intersection Main Rd & lgency or Go. DEA SigsbeeRd'FactoryAve )ate Performed 103007 Area Type All other areas "ime Period Saturdiy Midday Peak Hour Jurisdiction Town of Southold,SulfolkCounty Analysis Year 2006 No Build (SeasAdjust) Project ID Citgo /plume and Timing Inp6i EB WB NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH _ RT LT TH RT LT TH RT lumbor of lanes, N 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 o 1 ane group L TR L TR LT R LT R 'olume.. V (vp1h) _ 120 878 17 36 839 41 49 23 30 145 27 131 Heavy vehicles. `6HV 2 q I p p 4 p , 9 I_2 f' _ I o 12 eak-hour factor. PHF 0.90 0.90.90 0.90 J 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90.90 0.90.90 0.9-0 J 0.9-90 0.90 0.90 retimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P P P P A A A A J_ A A tart-up lost time. I. 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 _ 2.0 2.0 J 2.0 2.0 xtension of effective green, a 13.7 4.1 4.1 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 rrival type, AT -J 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 nit extension, LE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Itering.!melering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 it6l unmet demand, Q. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 ud / Bike / RTOR volumes J 0 10 0 I 0 0 4 0 30 me width 11.0 12.0 I 10.0 11.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10,0 arking i Grade / Parking I N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N_ J N 0 N irking maneuvers. Nn, rses stopping, NO 0 0 0 0 -_I 0 0 0 0 'n. time for pedestrians, Go 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 rasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 G- 9,3 G= 61.9 G= G= G= 17.1 G= 8.1G= nmg Y- 5.7 V= 6.1 Y= Y= Y= 5.9 Y= 5.9 V- Y- cation of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 we Group Cepeclly ConficlOplay, and LO gatsrlnll~a(7 , , -m" ' r+a 4IN kx *v EB _ WB NB SB LT TH RT 140;978 TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT !lusted flow rate. v 133 995 80 29 191 112 ne group capacity,c 157 1199 2 140 123 264 234 ratio, X 0.85 0.83 1.03 0.57 0.24 0.72 0.48 tal green ratio, g/C 0.09 0.66 0.53 0.53 0.08 0.08 _ J 0.16 0.16 form delay, di 53.7 15.4 15.4 28.0 52.9 51.4 I 48.0 46.0 )gression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 J 1.000 1.000 lay calibration, k 0 38 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.17 0.11 0.28 0.11 remcntal delay, d1 32.8 6.7 4.9 36.3 5.5 1.0 9.4 1.5_J ial queue delay, (13 1 I ntrol delay 86.4 22.2 20.3 J 64.3 58.5 52.4 57.4 47.5 to group I OS F C T; I I E D E D roach delay 29.7 J62.66 56.9 53.8 xonch LOS C E E D - - J ;rscctien delay 46.8 Intersoction LOS D (,.I ..uoIv 'TUC c:.,,.-a c,,.„.11, General Information Site Information Intersection Main Rd 8 - 4nalyst VC SigsbeeRd,FactotyA ve 4gency or Co. DEA Area Type All other areas )ate Performed 10130107 Jurisdiction Town of Southold,NYSOOT rime Period Saturday Midday Peak Hour Analysis Year 2008 Build (SeasAdiust) Project ID Citgo Volume and 77mina Input EB WB NB SB LT TH FIT LT -1H FIT J LT TH _ RT LT TH RT Dumber of lanes, N, 1 1 0 I 1 0 0 1 1 J 0 1 1 .ane grasp L TR L TR JI LT R LT R /olume, V (vph) 137 895 1 36 868 52 50 25 30 159 27 137 6 Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 4 2 i2 4 _ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 J.. 2 leak-bout factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 J 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 'l or actuated (A) A A P P P J A A A A J A lost lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 ;tart-up xtension of effective green, e 3.7 4.1 4.1 4.1 _ J 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 .rrival type, AT J 3 3 J-~ 3 J 3 3 3 3 3 'nit extension, extension. UEE 3.0 3.0 J 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 3.0 iltering/metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 iitial unmet demand, Qy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 J 0.0 0.0 ed /Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 30 ane width 11.0 12.0 10.0 11 5 l_ J 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 arking / Grade / Parking / Grade / Parking NN 0 N N _I 0 N J N 0 N N 0 N arking maneuvers, Nm uses stopping, stopping, Ns ' 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 in. time for pedestrians, G. L 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 hasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 ming IG= 10.0 G= 64.0 G= G= G= 16.0 G= 10.0 G- G= Y= 5 Y= 5 V= Y- Y= 5 Y- 5 Y- V= uration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 ;~11~ukf Lfi D¢rerminaHop s d m u' EB WB _ NB SB LT TH RT LT _ TH HT LT TH RT LT TH RT ijusled flow rate, v 152 1013 40 1022 84 29 207 119 me group capacity, c 167 1231 147 982` 167 147 249 220 ratio, X 0.91 0.82 0.27 1.04 0.50 0.20 0.83 0.54 rtal green ratio, g/C 0.10 0.68 0.55 0.55 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 Worm delay, dr 53.6 14.2 14.2 26.9 51.2 149.7 49.6 47.2 egression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 play calibration, k 0.43 0.36 0.50 0.50 I 0.11 I 0,11 0.37 0. 14 ~ aemental delay, d2 44.6 4.6 4.5 39.9 2.4 J 0.7 J_ 20.6 2.7 fiat queue delay, d3 J_ mtrol delay 98.3 18.9 18.8 66.8 J 53.7 50.3 370.2 49.9 no group LOS F B E D -D F J D proach delay 29.2 65.0 52.8 62.8 preach LOS C E D E erseclion delay 486 Intersection LOS p --_J ~::;-in, f'otn Yi Ju IYI~I9:1„ r. rL, PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 1 1952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Marg"r tkQwski 13et3, Perkins S'~ retaries October 26, 2009 Mr. Martin Sidor, Chairman and Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road t J P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: GAMA Deer Park 9, J;L),-.. ituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Sidor and Members of the Board: In response to comments received at the public hearing, we would ask that the following be incorporated into the record: 1. The traffic flow will be improved with the redevelopment of the site. Dunn Engineering provided the design of the off-site roadway improvements requested by the NYSDOT which included the radius on the northeast corner of Route 25 at Factory Avenue. A copy of the DOT application has been provided to you previously [Aug. 18 transmittal]. In order to accomplish these improvements, the existing traffic signal equipment and utility pole on the corner will be relocated and existing paving markings will be revised. In addition, the NYSDOT has recommended new access driveways to the site which will increase the distance between the existing access points and the ice cream store across the street which, with no curb cuts, presently backs out into Factory Avenue. 2. On July 28, 2009 the applicant provided two alternative truck templates. The Board on September 28, 2009 accepted drawing SP4. As the Board is aware, the existing gas station receives delivery of gasoline from large tankers from both Factory Avenue and Rt 25. Neighbors voiced complaints of parked trucks making deliveries to the Mattituck Shopping Center. We agree with Mr. Condon's recommendation that the Town should limit truck parking along Factory Avenue. This would be up to the Town Board, however, we support such a recommendation. 3. The Board is aware of the numerous Traffic Studies which have been completed for this area. In 2009 the Board reviewed a traffic study prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, PC in connection with this parcel. The traffic study specifically addressed the traffic impact of the proposed redevelopment of the existing gas station with the convenience store (ZBA issued 1/11/91) and additional automatic car wash, including trip generation, access, Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law October 26, 2009 Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 roadway capacity and safety. A similar traffic study was prepared for the redevelopment of the CVS on the south side of New York State Rt 25 and Marlene Lane. Furthermore, during the review of the Cottages subdivision both the Planning Board and Town Board considered the impacts of development off of Factory Avenue and the access points to that subdivision were designed to limit traffic impacts. 4. My client is only developing this parcel at 11% lot coverage rather than the 30% permitted in the zoning code. The use is permitted, as of right, subject only to site plan approval. which has previously been approved for a convenience store with a gas station and canopy. This project is reducing the intensity of the present uses from a gas station, a use allowed by Special Exception, to a stand alone retail store. 5. The balance of the comments made at the public hearing were related to social issues which are not relevant to the redevelopment of this property. Comments regarding existing violations at other properties, and requests for sidewalks and re-paving of Factory Avenue (we are providing sidewalks and cross walks adjacent to our property) do not require a response. V ruly ours, Lricioa'C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~QF SOP.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS CA Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 ND CO~n~y ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) GEORGE JOSEPH L. SOLOMON 1UlII11 Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 14, 2009 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Hearing Held Open: Proposed Site Plan for the Mattituck Seven Eleven Store Located at 9945 NYS Route 25, on the We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: B Dear Ms. Moore: At a meeting held on Monday, October 13, 2009, the Southold Town Planning Board held open the public hearing for the proposed Site Plan for the Mattituck Seven Eleven Store for an additional two weeks for written comments. Written comments will be accepted for a period of two weeks from the date of this letter after which the public hearing and public comment period is closed. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, I-It - Martin H. Sidor Chairman Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: `J ehJ 1 Gc ~CLtr f Z Subject:. / SCTM#:.1000 - ~oS - - oS Date: /0 3 / 0 Comments: 1 J O fO ?`'Ct ~v -SA 77 f F 4 ~ i?ia r * « i Fv':J y A. - _ - MrT K j~~„~ e rt ti i~MMsJ Xka* - _ , n' , u f ~iT~e r 4.y I" i ` ~ ~a=~xr19-mom` ~.-N• _ r..... .,.y 6 ' 4. - ti 1 v T~ • J' e f's~ ~ lip 4w f~'~ ~ rY S T^ iol~.1. lilM~'`~f 'fie' .,...a+/ iS+ rs J• ~ r I VZ~ 1 < j wY e r~,`~4 4»_ k IT! n • Sou r - ! ~;f6iSS:~l6~4: ~:.•~"f3 _ i~ ,af" ~ I A~.S~ i r :t lid ff R v } a K ran;.: L WETA ".rot V ~ ';+i - off' ~.'~y ~ ~ - A,'M -_'Mt'1{Ip~ rO• n ,y, .y ' mow Winser, Kristy • From: Lanza, Heather Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 3:37 PM To: Erin Schultz; Winser, Kristy Subject: RE: 7-Eleven what's next? Erin, The next step is for the Planning Board to review the public testimony for information they should use in their decision-making. After that they will finish the steps for reviewing site plans (these steps are in the Town Code). As soon as the review is completed, there will be a resolution at a monthly public meeting with the Planning Boards decision on the application. The review process has several variables that make it difficult to say when the deciding resolution would be on the public meeting agenda. The agendas are done by the Friday morning before the monthly meetings, which are posted on the web site, or available by calling 765-1938. It is difficult to say how long it will take, if approved, for the site to be completed. It depends on the applicant. Heather Hi there writing yet another 7-11 article, re: protest Saturday could one of you please send me a statement about what the next step is after the public hearing tonight? If all is approved, when will we see an actual 7-Eleven in Mattituck? 1 Oct 13 09 09:00a John Condon • 631 298-2651 p.1 New York State Licensed Professional Engineers 1755 Sigsbee Road 631-298-1986 Mattituck, New York 11952 Fax 631-298-2651 Fax Cover Sheet DATE: / I - TIME: TO: 1 ) ''0 " PHONE: FAX: 6 j ,j(" FROM: John J. Condon, P.E. PHONE: F 631-298-1986 RE: Number of pages including cover sheet: Messaae: 'Alt ~ 3 Zp09 Oct 13 09 09:55a John Condon 631-298-2651 p.1 91() bp l 1 tl/ October 10, 2009 T , !jam y OCT 1 3 2009 Mr. Martin H. Sidor - Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 iu Re: Seven Eleven, 9945 NYS Route 25, on"the We comer of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Sidor. I am a full time resident of Sigsbee Road in Mattituck and am directly impacted by the proposed 7-11 at the lop of my road. I had a chance to review the proposed site plans this week with my mother, Barbara Condon, who's also a full time resident of Sigsbee Road. In addition to being a local resident, I am also a New York State Licensed Professional Engineer and am very familiar with the site planning process and have worked on many similar projects on Long Island. I have major concerns regarding the proposed site plan for this property: 1. 1 have personally had many close calls at the intersection from cars turning out of the CVS parking area and cars turning right from Route 25 onto Sigsbee Road. When cars are parked along the west side of Sigsbee Road, the southbound cars drive down the center of the road and almost cause head on collisions. There were supposed to be no parking signs installed in this area as part of the CVS site plan but were never installed. 2. Cars making left turns onto Factory Avenue from the proposed 7-11 will cause problems when the cars are stacked at the red light and patrons block the northbound lane of Factory Avenue because there is not enough room to make it into the southbound lanes. In addition this will be worse when Magic Fountain is busy. The following are my recommendations for the proposed site plan: 1. Construct the cross access between the 7-11 and the Waldbaums Shopping Center. This will allow the cars to go between shopping centers without the use of adjacent roadways and reduce the impact of the 7-11 on the Factory Avenue/Route 25 intersection. 2. Prohibit left turns onto Factory Avenue from the site and install "No Left Turn" signs at the exit from the 7-11 parking lot. 3. Install "No Parking" signs along the east and west sides of Sigsbee Road up to 150 feet from the intersection. 4. Trim the trees at the southwest corner of the CVS property in the right-of-way to give patrons exiting CVS more visibility to see northbound vehicles on Sigsbee Road. Oct 13 09 09:03a John Condon 631-298-2651 p.1 • • 5. Enforce the new turning restrictions and current restrictions in the area especially the no left tum restriction from Route 25 into the west entrance of the Waklbaums shopping center. I see this happen every day. I believe these mitigations will improve the intersection overall and improve safety for the community. My mother was in the chiropractor's office in Mattituck this week when she overheard a sitting member on your planning board discussing the 7-11 project in an adjacent room. He indicated that the 7-11 was a "done deaf" and that "the people against this project are wasting their time fighting it". This was very upsetting since the public hearing had not yet been held and other voices heard regarding this site plan. It is disturbing to know that a sifting member of your board is making comments like this in public and its very unprofessional. I would hope and expect that the planning board is withholding decisions until the end of the site plan process after hearing all parties involved and ignore outside influences from politicians and deep pocketed business owners. There are many people upset in my neighborhood about this proposed 7-11 the concerns are mostly due to traffic. During the CVS site plan process, we feel that our concerns were ignored and promises that were made were never implemented. I hope the town planning board will hear our concerns this time around since we are the people who deal with this area every day. Thank you very much for entertaining my concerns for this project. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions regarding my concerns. Yours Truly, J;o rJ 18 oad Mattituck, NY 11952 298-2129 Cc. John J. Condon, President Sigsbee Road Civic Association Scots A. Russell, Supervisor PATRIA C. MOORE, ATTORNEY* LAW 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-4330 DATE U ECT TO SUBJ b~-o- (-A-) -~A' jc -J- CIL \j rr"T-8c SIGNED PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT OF GAMA PROPERTIES (MATTITUCK 7-11) SIGN POSTING Regarding Posting of Sign Upon Applicant's Land Identified as 1000-142-1-27 ---------------------------------------------------------------x COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, PATRICIA C. MOORE residing at 370 Terry Lane, Southold, New York being duly sworn, depose and say that: On tho day of October, 2009, 1 personally placed the Town's official Poster, with the date of hearing and nature of the application noted thereon, securely upon the property, located ten (10) feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can easily be seen; and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. ICIA C. MOORE v~orn to before me this day of October, 2009. 8~L 0, t ota Pu WMA/EM0 waq wOBe, ewaw.~ w mreasss Cam M.om maim ~ n F~p~,1W *near the entrance or driveway entrance of the property, d9lhe area most visible to passersby. i RECEIPT RECF RECEIPT RECEIPT RECEIPT 7192 6,163 3110 0000 5138 7192 6963 311 15145 7192 6463 3110 0000 5152 ,92 6463 3110 0000 5169 7192 6463 3110 0000 5176 FROM: FROM: FROM FROM: FROM: PATRICIAC. MOOREESQ. PATRICIAC. MOOREESQ. PATRICIAC. MOOREESQ. PATRICIAC. MOOREESQ. PATRICIAC. MOOREESQ. RE: MATT 7-11 PUBLIC HEARIN RE: MATT7-11 PUBLIC HEARIN RE: MATT 7-11 PUBLIC HEARIN RE'. MATT 7-11 PUBLIC HEAP RE: MATT 7-11 PUBLIC HEARIN SEND TO: SEND TO SEND TO: SEND TO: SEND TO MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC SCP 20050 21-051, LLC KOCH HOLDING CORP. JAMES J KREH MARY & SAM RAY PO BOX 77 CIO CVS CORP. 840 N. OAKWOPOD DRIVE 1500 CHALLENGER AVE. PO BOX 507 MATTITUCK NY 11952 ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DEPT. LAUREL NY 11948 DAVENPORT FL 33897 MATTITUCK NY 11952 ONE CVS DRIVE, STORE 3105 WOONSOCKET R1028% FEES: FEES: FEES: _ FEES: FEES: -'0 44 Postage 044 Postage 0.44 Pos certifies F ao - certified 2.80 c 8j1 z.~ can A z eI certd Postage ea E 1 , w 49 Retu A?_ Rei id 4 2 30 - R ipt .3Q Return 118 31 R n 3Q Rest It R.." ml ~J Reyyay ) ~j I TOT 5. TONAL 5.914 TO $ 5. TOY 51 TOT $5 P RgOR DAT y pD6TMARJROR D TES P OR D PaSTMAgKr~R DA E P MA OR DA , Jy4; ~ s yQ ' Qy r 00 oY ` 1rp ,1 <1T~ @q c w 0e, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECEIPT RECEIPT RECEIPT RECEIPT RECEIPT ]192 6463 3110 0000 5183 7192 6963 3110 0000 5190 7192 6463 3110 0000 52% 7192 6463 3110 0000 5213 ]192 6963 R3110 ECEIPT 0000 5220 FROM FROM FROM: FROM: PATRICIAC. MOORE ESQ. PATRICWC. MOORE ESQ. FROM PATRICIA C. MOORE ESQ. PATRICIA C. MOORE ESQ. . . RE: MATT ]-11 PUBLIC HEARIN RE' MATT 7-11 PUBLIC HEARIN RE: MATT 7-11 PUBLIC HEARIN' RE: MATT 7-11 PUBLIC HEARIN PATRICIAC MOOREESQ RE: MATT 7-11 PUBLIC HEARIN SEND TO SEND TO: SEND TO: SEND TO SEND TO: MARY E. MILLS HERMAN H. HUBBARD HERMAN H. HUBBARD JOSEPH PERINO PO BOX 507 JUDVAYTULIN JUDY AYT ANTHONY J. ANTONGEORGI MATTITUCK NY 11952 195FACTORYAVENUE 1% F AVENUE 30 PEDDLER LER HILL HILL ROAD RTE 48 MATTITUCK NY 11952 MATTITUCK 195 FACTORY Y NY 1 11952 1952 MPEONROE NV 10950 , APT MATTITUCK NY 11952 FEES: FEES FEES: FEES: FEES: Postage 044 Postage ,y 11 F Postage 0.44 Postage 0.44 Certified Fee 2.80 Certded IN*.. rd&, Cartffied Fee Postage 0.44 Ralum Receipt 2.30 Retu , t A`'^ Cerided Fee 2 80 280 Certified Fee 280 P. P T Retum Rece,pt 2 30 RNum Rece'~ 2.30 Olleisoicted ResK d , VO ~y ResV,de Restridetl R um Pi 2.30 OTAL - $ 5.54 TOT" $ 5 5q TOTAL ° 54 T(?MTAL Sq Resmeed "t~~~~~` F TOTAL ` 54 POSTMARK OR DATE pp$""~ R DAT R QRK O ATk S,RK O TE l~B7~~p±RI( OR D PO, E' RECEIPT RECEIPT 7192 6163 3110 0000 5237 7192 6963 3110 (X100 5244 FROM: FROM: PATRICIAC. MOOREESQ. PATRICIAC. MOOREESO. RE: MATT 7-11 PUBLIC HEARIN RE: MATT 7-11 PUBLIC HEARIN SEND TO: SEND TO MAY &TOW INCORPORATED WALTER & RUTH KOCH %50 ROUTE 25 PO BOX 225 LAUREL NV 11948 LAUREL NV 11947 FEES: FEES: Postage 0.44 Postage 0.44 Certified Fee 2 80 Certified Fee 2.80 Return Receipt 2.30 Return Receipt 2.30 ResMCed Rmft cted TOTAL $ 5.54 TOTAL $ 5.54 POSTMARK OR DATA _ POSTMARK OR DATE I c: of O F, Fill P °n ~m W IA {n L ai Y' ~ ~ m C O 1 ai m w ~ m c -1NA m O o r 'm 2 O H W O n °n r 3 H Ic' N' H z z n 4. Restricted Delivery? 3. Service T > u H K PATRICIA C. MOORE ESQ. a H r o 51020 MAIN ROAD (Extra Fee) []Yes CERT 7!` j m v w 30 n SOUTHOLD NY 11971 0 2. Article Number o 3 • k+ A n rn 7192 6463 3110 0001 n` m A. Signature: (Addressee or ?Agent) IIIIII III ii IIII 111111111111111111111111111 A B, Received By: (Please Print Clearly) 2D09 = > I SEP 712 6463 3110 0000 S 3 V 3 Z s o s ^ ~ a o C. Date of Delivery 1. Article Adrdlossed To: - -1 m < > L--r I F -1 X r'1 n „B p a D. Addressee's Address (noaemmFmmntlmea.ua•aeysanaed SCP R - C 21-051, L LC _ n v+ a n k z A OPERTY TAX DEPT. r o= N Z m Secontlary ntlareaz / Suite 1 Mt. / Fleor (Pleaae PNnf CleeNy) N W 3 ` n Ir" ONE CVS DRIVE, STORE 3105 _ r WOONSOCKET RI 02895 Y W t ° ? I ..oeiive r nndia:..---------- = N or I City Sate ZIP + 4 Cotle I n:. m, mi O n Ol y ' • • . . n i n O 1 m r° vl to v ro C' o r s A. Signature: (0 Addressee or 0 Agent) e m -IN Z a. O a d ~ 2 0 H IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII m co-I n < r 3 H . B. Received By (P/ ase Print C/e rly) N N ~ - p b hs-I s w~ 0.~ eCk 7192 6463 3110 0000 5 m Q m 'n z z n 0 0 H a < C. Date of Delivery' l 1. Article Addressed To: - a m 3 m e, p o l /0 3 D, Addressee's Address rnomn,aP,wanaae.aua.eeysna.tl MARY 8 SAM RAY vp a Q mD' N M PO BOX 507 s N "sewowdan Aaereec / S Fl---em MATTITUCK NY 11952 M m u'rfe I aa~~ (Fleece PtlM Clentlyf j: o ~ rn v: e: c i)~;r naereaa e' `a 3 CRY 3 V 3 •Z Fir - I _ 192 6463 311U-Uua --1 ° 7 -4 A • _ - -I m -1 a • • • H O H y t+ A. Sig natur Addresse or nt) N C X C N N m JC J JC i ru J C m _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIi B. Received By:: (Plea Print Cie ) 13 z v r m T 7192 6463 3110 ?000 5 { > w z a r N 3 C, Date of Delivery -'J1. Article Addressed To: In r brr W < m ro ti _~e ntl r C3 n W a I D. ddressee'sAddress (noln. aae a.aay .p KOCH HOLDING CORP. G t. 840 N• OAKWOPOD DRIVE - LAUREL NY 11948 o n . S........................... I guile/A -x dyf o o m ? econtlary Ptltlress p[. lee ~ O m to o f ~ ~ ry w w w O ciiy'_.......__...__.....__°'"sieie-------- iP 4co4e 0:` I i i • = n O 1 0 [n In V ai ~ o o N s ~ m c m T n** n `V of m 0 0 2 a ru m H 2 O H m m O n n m n m eys s ! ~ ~ n z z n s. ~ m m t' O 3 ~ ~ R • EeD 3 S O0 ,d d O laJ 9: ? m 4. Restricted Delivery? 3. Service Type m ' m PATRICIA C. MOORE ESQ. v rn 51020 MAIN ROAD (Extra Fee) E]Yes CERTIFIED SOUTHOLD NY 11971 2. Article Number i I I ' 7192 6463 3110 0000 5190 s • • 3-4 z 1 adz A. Signature. (?Addressee or ?Agent) 1 m H a B. Received By: (Please Print Clearly) IIII II II' I) I II I II III III III IIII I II I I I III I C as { ° ti > k A 7192 6463 3110 0000 • I n L a g- .l w 5190 C. Date of Delive z u r m m Delivery 1. Article Addressed To: ff" Z m m I t s ru w V = n 0. Addressee's Address(vnmen,aF mA a.aaoaaaeysena•q El HERMAN H. HUBB ARD JUDY AYTULIN rt"u r~i p w 195 FACTORY AVENUE - twr m "seeenda "'Xedre:~"i 3uiie'/."."."...__..... ry Mt. / Fleor (Pleeae Prlra Clearly) L? y MATTITUCK NY 11952 C3 H O ~ o m oe Q1 C3 n ml uverr near _ c _ Ml m I m 0 m a cur P ° ,:aUte .ZIP # Cote I D Q O A G O un m m ~ ( ) I ' ' g' `m c 'J ?Addressa N r. p n SOH 1 A. 5 9natur r a 'm I I _ . O n • IIIIII II'II~I~IIII~~IIIIII~I 111 C O -1 n H I 5169 y I "ND S. eived By: (Plea Print Cleary 7 192 6463 3110 0 000 „ ° z z n l o « a t II a m m A 1. Article Addressed To: o r ~l • t+ s 3 C. Date of Delivery as O ' KREH 1500 II s ~ o v o D. Addressees Address (nolm.atPAmaad~•+eu..anrs.ear1 JAMES CHALLENGER AVE• - $ ~p a ? m 2 n ° m m DAVENPORT FL 3389 , o p aecontlary Address j soils I MI. I Flmr (Pleeae Print Clsady) al • N d I l: e • mellvery 4Jareas 71 "atcte -...._....ZIP 4 Cutle \ _ 1 D city I - -192 6463 3110 Dana 5244 I ..o c m n itod.~ n • • 13 D ~ - A. Signatu Addressee or A• nt) I T s a k' -0 I'a I m nu A 8. Re e' tl By: (P/ease Pr/nt /early) 111111111111111111111111111111111111 m 7 al r T p 7192 6463 3110 0000 5244 I z c p w s m w O C. Date of Delivery I r m El i. Article Adtlressetl To: r m m s w r " I un z m r 111- < m -11 u+ c d r w w ~ 0. Addressee's Address (n mn Pmm rmma,ua.ea s r, BOX I N m C3 PALTER 225UTH KOCH I w o a, o r rw a ai o suiie'i LAUREL NY 11947 C3 o ITf ~ I C3 m Ln m ti I rv T ~ I ru o I State ZIP « 4 Cotla a.., I Sentlera 4. Restricted Delivery? 3. service Type PATRICIA C• MOORE ESQ• CERTIFIED e a m (Extra Fee) Yes a NI 51020 MAIN ROAD ' SOUTHOLD NY 11971 2. Article Number o ~ f$oaw 7192 6463 3110 0000 5237 ~a_~0g 1 r~f I _ 0 5^ ` i A. Signature: (OAddressee or []Agent) I' N, S. Received Byr (Please Print Clearly) 7192 6463 311o 0 OO 0 5237 r I C. Date of Delivery 1. Article Addressed To: ~ m I W ~ ® fnoft.*Fm.Adtl .U.dlys..e.n MAY 8 TONY INCORPORATED ~LD.AddressedsAddleSS w 9650 ROUTE 2 n LAUREL NY 11948 PrlrrtClery....._..- - -----------..3 10/09/2009 14:35 FAX 631 765 4643 MOORE LAW OFFICES bPlannins Board lao01 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET The pagers comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information from Patricia C. Moore. This information is intended solely for use by the individual entity named as the recipient hereof. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone imm Lately so we may aa to retrieve this transmission at no cost to you. TOOA 7 FAX NO: RE: DATE: ~ 9 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET IF TRANSMISSION IS FAULTY OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. common `Ltv PATRICIA C. MOORE ESQ. 4. Reetrmted OelrveM LB A m Ttpe 51020 MAIN ROAD fExtr.Fee) ~Yss O I I >^UTHOLD NY 11971 1 l 2 Artiole Number I 1 7192 6463 3110 0000 5213 . I1 11 u M Yp II,' A Sig re: (OAdd as or ?Apen0 ~IIN ~ ~ Ipl ~ nll~Iul~pyll tl Nl B. NW ay ( Print ciandy/ 7192 6463 3110 0000 5233 ' I . Date Of Delivery Artlele Addr"dg4~, 7 - I e 0.Addrwsse'sAddressparw,.,eww„nm...w.asrtl.rmM JOS*P PERINO LET ki ( . S 170 ' 30 PE DH eC,RpAD, APT. b ;j""a:.dne:6 ntlo-...r§di"'/iiq re.o: iw«n vd.i "cle:Ml MONROE NY 1090- s>a 1 GAMA PROPERTIES (7-11 STORE) NEIGHBOR LIST SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC HERMAN H. HUBBARD PO BOX 77 JUDY AYTULIN MATTITUCK NY 11952 195 FACTORY AVENUE SCTM: 1000-142-1-26 MATTITUCK NY 11952 SCTM: 1000-122-6-11 SCP 2005-C 21-051, LLC HERMAN H. HUBBARD C/O CVS CORP. JUDY AYTULIN ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DEPT. 195 FACTORY AVENUE STORE 3105 MATTITUCK NY 11952 ONE CVS DRIVE SCTM: 1000-122-6-8 WOONSOCKET RI 02895 SCTM: 1000-143-2-30.2 JOSEPH PERINO LETITIA NASTASIA 30 PEDDLER HILL ROAD, APT. 1 KOCH HOLDING CORP. MONROE NY 10950 840 N. OAKWOPOD DRIVE SCTM: 1000-122-7-9 LAUREL NY 11948 SCTM: 1000-122-6-9 ANTHONY J.ANTONGEORGI JAMES J. KREH RTE 48 1500 CHALLENGER AVE. MATTITUCK NY 11952 DAVENPORT FL 33897 SCTM: 1000-122-6-11 SCTM: 1000-122-6-10 MAY & TONY INCORPORATED MARY & SAM RAY 9650 ROUTE 25 PO BOX 507 LAUREL NY 11948 MATTITUCK NY 11952 SCTM: 1000-143-1-1 SCTM: 1000-122-6-6 WALTER & RUTH KOCH PO BOX 225 MARY E. MILLS LAUREL NY 11947 PO BOX 507 SCTM: 1000-143-1-2 MATTITUCK NY 11952 SCTM: 1000-122-6-7 PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT GAMA PROPERTIES (MATTITUCK 7-11) OF (Name of Applicant) MAILINGS CTM Parcel #1000-142-1-27 -------------------------------------------------x COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, BETSY PERKINS, residing at Mattituck, New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 1s' day of October, 2009, 1 personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Southold, New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to current owners shown on the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the ( X ) Assessors, or ( ) County Real Property Office , for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. Signature) BETSY PER S Sworn to before me this day of October, 2009 V `/'/avGt~ce'~ ( otary Public) MARGARET C. RUTKOWSI4 Notary Public, State of New York No. 4982528 OuaiMed in Suffolk Count commission Expires June 3, O PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. • PATRICIA C. MOORE • Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 7654330 Fax: (631) 7654643 October 1, 2009 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED RE:. PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR MATTITUCK 7-11 STORE PROPERTY: 9945 ROUTE 25, N/E CORNER OF FACTORY AVE & RTE 25, MATTITUCK, NEW YORK SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 Dear Neighbor: I represent the above with regard to their site plan application. The Southold Town Planning Board has scheduled a Public hearing and I am enclosing the Notice to Adjacent Property Owners. The hearing on this matter has been scheduled for TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. at Southold Town Hall. If you have any questions, or you wish to support this application, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, li •-Fatricia C. Moore PCM/bp encls. C: Gama Properties r 4 Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-142-1-27; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the B Zoning District; 4. That the application is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 685 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635 sq. ft. building on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel. The property is located at 9945 NYS Route 25, on the We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. in the Planning Department located in the Town Hall Annex on the corner of Youngs Ave. & NYS Rte. 25, Southold (2nd Fl., Capital One Bank). If you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938. Information can also be obtained via the internet by sending an e-mail message to: Carol. Kalin@town.southold. ny.us; 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Tuesday. October 13. 2009 at 6:00 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in The Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner Name: GAMA Properties Deer Park, Inc./Mattituck Seven Eleven Store Date: 9/24/09 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~OF Si)P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON Q (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND I~-rou l' Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE September 28, 2009 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Gama Deer Park ( 7-11 Mattituck SCTM# 142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore; I'm writing as a follow up to the Planning Board work session held on September 28, 2009. As you are aware the Board accepted the engineer's comments, the floor plan, and the truck template drawing SP4 but did not accept the template drawing SP5. As discussed, the Board will request a revised lighting plan, additional map changes, and further discuss the parking area and designation along the east property line at a follow up work session after the public hearing scheduled for this application on October 13, 2009. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, / Kristy Winser, Senior Planner cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Project: Seven ElevenSite Plan Preparer: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: September 28, 2009 1. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: Seven Eleven SCTMN#: 1000-142-1-27 Street Location: 9945 NYS Route 25, Mattituck Hamlet: Mattituck Zoning District: Business Type of Site Plan: New Property Owner: Gama Deer Park, Inc Applicant: same Agent: Pat Moore Site Plan Prepared By: Kempey Engineering Date of Map: 10/10/08, last revised 7/23/09 11. Description of Site Plan Project Construction Type: Proposed 685 sq foot addition to existing building for retail use. Zoning Determination: The Notice of Disapproval indicates the need for site plan approval For additions and alterations, converting an existing gas station and convenience store to a convenience store. The proposed meets zoning. Call of meeting: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 s.f. Gas Station/convenience store and add a 658 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,670 s.f. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24,829 s.f. parcel in the Business Zone located on the We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 SEQRA Classification: Type II - no further Action Building size area: 2,670sq. ft Lot coverage: 11.06% (30% allowed) Parking required: 14 @ 1/per 200sf Parking proposed: 24 (including 2 ADA compliant) Landscaping proposed: 31.64% (20% required) • 0 Staff report for Seven Eleven P.2 III.Time line: Date of submission to PB: 9/9/08- incomplete &required pre-submission. Date of pre-submission conference: 9/23/08 Date of application accepted & W.S.: 11/3/08 - referred out. Date of project scoping: 11/05/08 Date new application submitted: 3/6/09, scheduled for work session 3/16/09 Date PB accepted application: 6/8/09 Date application referred out: 6/11/09 Date scheduled for WS: 7/20/09 Date Follow up letter: 7/28/09, requested additional information Date revisions submitted: 8/27/09 Date sent to Town Engineer: 9/1/09 Date of Engineer comments: 9/11/09 Date scheduled for W.S: 9/28/09 Date scheduled for P.H: 10/13/09 Date of letters from Planning Board: 9/19/08 - Incomplete, 10/21/08- Comments sent to ZBA, 10/24/08-incomplete, 11/5/08-application accepted & referred out, 1/2/09 - Comments sent to ZBA regarding SEQR (Type II no further review), 2/10/08-no further review until revised plans that meet the code are submitted for review, 3/24/09- site plan submission dated 3/6/09 was not complete. 5/12/09 - last submission not complete, need a truck template as previously requested 3/24/09. 6/9/09- Follow up, accepted application and referred out. Status: proposed addition was denied by the ZBA on 1/22/09. Revised plans submitted 3/6/08 scheduled for work session on 3/16/08. Application was not complete. Requested revisions on 3/25/09. Applicant submitted information on 4/17/09 but did not include a truck template. Advised applicant 5/12/09 that this was required and plans showing trucks on site was submitted for review on 5/22/09. The Application was scheduled for a WS on 6/8/09 where the PB formally accepted the application for review. 7/20/09 discussed comments at W.S. then requested additional information. 8/27/09-revisons submitted and referred to the Town engineer for comment. The application is scheduled for a W.S. 9/28/09 and also for a public hearing dated 10/13/09. IV. The following was discussed at the 7/20/09 W.S. NYS DOT Based on 3/30/09 letter to the applicant, additional information is required. It has been agreed that the applicant will be responsible for site improvements and the cost for the radius improvements. However, the State will undertake the cost of relocating of the utility and pedestrian traffic control facilities. • Staff report for Seven Eleven P.3 This is being coordinated with the DOT. The applicants engineer submitted revised plans to the DOT 8/13/09. The PB has not received a final DOT curb cut permit but will be necessary prior to final approval. Drainage review from Town Engineer The current proposal appears to meet the minimum standards required by the Town Code. The PB accepted the comments from the office of the Town Engineer and for the applicant to follow the road improvements recommended by the DOT. Mattituck Fire District Recommend that all access points allow for fire access and that all drives be cleared and maintained to meet Southold Town Code. The Board to accepted the Mattituck Fire District comments. SCPC Local jurisdiction ARC The PB accepted the ARC comments in relation to proposed elevations, lighting, and signage and requested that the applicant provide these details. V. The Planning Board made the following determinations and agreed for the following items to be submitted for review and consideration: 1. The PB relaxed the 25-foot front landscaped and 5 foot landscape strip along the front of the building requirement based on the subject parcel is an existing site and the applicant is proposing considerable landscaping having red cedar street trees, a corner landscape treatment area and planter boxes along the front of the building. • The applicant is showing the street trees with in the state ROW. This will need to be reviewed and approved by the DOT or moved onto the subject property (also mentioned by the Town Engineer, comment 7 in the report to the PB). Additionally, although the PB has considered landscape relaxations, the applicant needs to breakdown overall landscaping accordingly to onsite, not including the ROW or Buffer areas. It appears that the 31.64% overall landscaping includes these areas. 2. Submit a floor plan that reflects the proposed design shown in the site plan. 0 7 copies where submitted 0 Staff report for Seven Eleven p.4 3. Provide a truck template on a plan that matches the proposed site plan. The truck template should demonstrate how trucks will circulate the site and execute ingress and egress at all access points, including entering the site northbound and southbound from Factory Avenue. • The Town Engineer references in comment 1 in the report to the PB, that it is not recommend to accept a truck template plan that shows northbound movement along factory in the opposite lane. He recommends for the PB to limit this access by using only the southbound lane on factory Ave or westbound lane on route 25. (SP4) 4. The parking area to the east of the building has slopes, a guardrail and a retaining wall. Submit a grading plan that clearly demonstrates proposed parking and loading for this area. • The Town Engineer references in comments 2 & 3 in the report to the PB the following for the Boards consideration: o The existing retaining wall is on the adjacent property (4 'from eastern property line). There is a proposed stacked retaining wall (detail on SP3) proposed setback 1 'from the eastern property line. o Construction of such wall should not interfere with the existing retaining wall but standard notes are recommended to protect the integrity of the existing wall. o Last, it is recommended that the applicant make clear that they don't alter the existing retaining wall in anyway prior to an agreement be made between the applicant and adjacent property owner. A note should be place on the plan referencing this as well. 5. The Board Agreed on only two parking stalls facing Factory Ave, removing 2 parking stalls closest to the entrance from the Main Road. • The applicant has designated parking as employee (Factory side), compact cars (east property line) and removed parking as requested. • Designation and proposed landscaping needs to be discussed for the area parking was removed. • The applicant has designated parking spaces as for employee parking or for compact cars and has not shown anything proposed in place of parking that was removed. 6. The cross access agreement needs to be further discussed. • A Note stating "in the event the cross access agreement in place is improved, the applicant will remove existing parking in place of the access point to the property on the east side" was to be provided on the plan. Is this something the Board still requests or like to add/revise • 0 Staff report for Seven Eleven p.5 e language based on engineer comments, the removal of parking/addition of landscaping? 7. Submit revised elevations in accordance with the ARC recommendations. e 3 prints of colored rendering. 8. Submit Signage detail indicating only two signs (one monument style, one wall sign) that meet both the ARC and Staff recommendations: e There are only 2 signs proposed as required by the PB, and both are wood style signs with simple gooseneck lighting. The street sign is a monument style sign and is no higher than 6' in height. 9. Revise the parking light poles so they do not exceed 14 feet in height to the bulb. e Although the applicant has revised the light pole detail on SP3 to show the light pole as 12 feet, there were no changes to the lighting plan and the two should match. VI. Site Design Elements that still need to be addressed: 1. Provide Health Department documentation pertaining to use of existing/proposed sanitary systems as well as the grease trap proposed to the rear of the building. As discussed, an approval from the Suffolk County Health Department will be required prior to site plan approval. Also, include a description of how this area will be serviced. 2. Clarification on the percentage of total landscaping onsite and whether this number is inclusive of the natural buffer area. As noted this number may change based on the proposed sanitary proposed in the rear buffer area therefore a landscape plan that includes this area may need to be submitted for review. 3. Location of Street trees. 4. Revised lighting plan the reflects 12 foot light poles and removal of some of the light poles (as previously discussed, its not necessary for all that are proposed. 5. Cross-access language. 6. What should be in place of area of removed parking and parking stall designation? 7. Truck template. WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, September 28, 2009 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Site Plans and Subdivisions Project name: Sparkling Pointe SCTM# 1000-59-10-1 . Location: 39750 C.R. 48, Southold Description: : This site plan is for the alteration of an existing building into a new winerytotaling 11,541 sq. ft. that includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. for retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of a tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq. ft. for production area on a 12.008-acre parcel in the A -C Zone. _ _ . Status: Site Plan Review Action: Applicant requests the Planning Board to consider changes made to the approved site plan. Attachments: None Project name Mattituck Seven Eleven SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Location n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to a retail store only (convenience store) and add a 685 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635 sq. ft. building on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone. - Status: New Site Plan Action: Review comments last submission and Engineer comments with the Planning Board Attachments Staff Report, Engineer Comments, Letter from Applicant received 8/27/09; Project name: FIDCO/Flower/Baker 2009 ! SCTM#' 1000-10-5-8.3, 10-5-9, 10-5-12.9 Location (no private road off East End Road, Fishers Island ! Description: ! Lot line change. This proposal is for lot line changes where no new building lots will be created. Status: Open Action: Accept application for sketch. Attachments: Staff Report Protect name Zuckerberg, Lloyd P. SCTM#.' 1000-86-1-10.9 Location: 2350 Wells Road, Peconic, southwest corner of Wells Road and State Route 25 in Peconic . Description. This proposal is for an 80/60 clustered conservation subdivision on t 32.83 acres resulting in two residential lots & one agricultural lot. Status: Sketch Action: Accept final maps for review, send out referral to Town Engineer. Attachments: None #9472 • STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Karen Kine of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 week(s), successively, commencing on the 1 day of October. 2009. ~j Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this y day of 2009. STINX C VOLINSKI YORK NOTARY NoLO _V06106060W Y Qualified In Suffolk County My Commission Expitet February 28, 2012 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS OF SU(/ry P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON Q (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND !'`CO Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 13th day of October, 2009 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for the Mattituck Seven Eleven Store, located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-142-1-27 Dated: 9/23/09 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Martin H. Sidor Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2009 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Suffolk Times Page 1 of 1 Kalin, Carol From: Legals [legals@timesreview.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 4:35 PM To: Kalin, Carol Subject: RE: attachment for 10/1 edition of Suffolk Times Hi Carol, I have received it and we are good to go for thel0/1 issue. Thanks and have a great evening! Candice From: Kalin, Carol [mailto:Carol.Kalin@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 3:14 PM To: Legals Subject: attachment for 10/1 edition of Suffolk Times Carol Kalin, Secretarial Assistant Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Annex, 54375 NYS Rt. 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Carol.Kalin@town.southold.ny.us 9/24/2009 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~rsf S0(/ld P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~0~ Ol0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS CA Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G @ 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON Q • (oor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND !7 CO Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765.3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 13th day of October, 2009 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for the Mattituck Seven Eleven Store, located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-142-1-27 Dated: 9/23/09 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Martin H. Sidor Chairman STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 24th day of September, 2009 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 10/13/09 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for the Mattituck Seven Eleven Store, SCTM#1000-73-2-4 Ej~ a.2,- Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this Nl~ ay ofoel9titjtx,~ 2009. Notary Public MELANIE DOROSM NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. 01D04634870 Qualified in Suffolk County Ole, Commission Expires September 30, MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS a0F S0 P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND rouNr+ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 24, 2009 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Set Hearing: Proposed Site Plan for the Mattituck Seven Eleven Store Located at 9945 NYS Route 25, on the We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: B Dear Ms. Moore: The public hearing regarding the site plan for the above-referenced application has been scheduled for Tuesday, October 13, 2009, at 6:00 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 55, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting alona with the certified mailina receipts AND the signed areen return receipt cards before 12.00 noon on Friday. October 9th. The sign and the post need to be returned to the Plannina Board Office after the public hearing. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman Encls. Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-142-1-27; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the B Zoning District; 4. That the application is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 685 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635 sq. ft. building on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel. The property is located at 9945 NYS Route 25, on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. in the Planning Department located in the Town Hall Annex on the corner of Youngs Ave. & NYS Rte. 25, Southold (2nd Fl., Capital One Bank). If you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938. Information can also be obtained via the internet by sending an e-mail message to: Carol. Kalin@town.southold.ny. us; 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Tuesday. October 13. 2009 at 6:00 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in The Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner Name: GAMA Properties Deer Park, Inc./Mattituck Seven Eleven Store Date: 9/24/09 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY. 12:00 noon, Fri., 10/9/09 Re: Proposed Site Plan for GAMA Properties Deer Park, Inc.IMattituck 7-11 Store SCTM#s: 1000-142-1-27 Date of Hearing: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 6:00 p.m. Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows § 55-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [Amended 6-3-2003 by L.L. No. 12-20031 Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application or petition is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. Notice relating to a public hearing on an application or petition shall be provided as follows: A. Town responsibility for publication of notice. The reviewing board or commission shall cause a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. Applicant or petitioner responsibility for posting and mailing notice. An application or petition, initiated, proposed or requested by an applicant or petitioner, other than a Town board or commission, shall also be subject to additional notice requirements set forth below: (1) The applicant or petitioner is required to erect the sign provided by the Town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application or petition abuts, giving notice of the application or petition, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than 10 feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant, petitioner or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. (2) The applicant or petitioner is required to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the property included in the application or petition. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application or petition and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The notice shall include description of the street location and area of the subject property, nature of relief or approval involved, and date, time and place of hearing. The applicant, petitioner or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. 1 GAMA PROPERTIES DEER PARK, INC. MATTITUCK 7=11 STORE SITE PLAN • 1000=142=1=27 Site Plan to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 685 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635 sq. ft. building on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone. TUESDAY - OCT. 13, 2009 - 6:00 P.M. - - MISS SEE SEC w L+ xw Pa.o 1! g?W11 O-a. q SEE IM MOMS u0 vnlnu. f--11- xa s ` LS YA101~~~ IlE WTW IM y -it -m-0 7A LTA f ~~n QP -01- LOA 4 uflMtY 0-W- uBVUYIA IxiR51 li.4 S] SA ~ EGA4d I O I oA 1~ ~ rtP m.ln 1-1" O ,x4~x ss q -13-01 1+ a : 1- 1 n 1.0 z+.s u " 'J' . c E + I . NIE, 0-0- )3100 + S 4u . V n • $ uMd m LAW r." a .n-o z)zP a ~ J q s ~ u .0 30. a \ O f.EMd 16-0 4 1-@-0 Ti ."a s O -OM1 SM ~ ~ u U.. .II Z< ~ 1L S 1 S 1 0 pe 'si fP ' E. 1`°°" w• x~ E w x n s - N - ® , a EI4v1 C s a VA O ul i x~ S . \l . aEE i m-osasas 4),~ 9 O Q 1 r a + a• ~ ~ ~ \ /0 SA - ~ 110 uA Sz.I 'IF 15A PV 143 SAM AUI y ~Q\ / -(lam /////,f-y? : p 11 Id ~ ~ 'r\ S 11tAld ~ ~d/~// 110 s 11+ ddyJ MINIS, / 1 O ~ 9 E r samn3 ~EA• x py~ xlmxrlven nE SECILL v 1.0 f.SEO'1 yy 121~ ,~73J a r_1 O lip Y y. q 1 Lt , 4',iJ 'S y a Diu v xp• a ucs-ei. w. x PATCH Y 'p' SFE SE4.10. 116. ~ [`GD~\C Y QV ~IIPIE! AN APPA1Brt OOFItl.M C0MII1011 ~ F1615 OTE101 OEOCIt 00 BE'i1E01 P.VmS SME! a.x ^w^•~ LL +oncE =MTY OF SUFFOLK © E mExv SOUTHOLD SECTION NO ~"2 led .:R s.- ..r u. .u mn. rK va.wxc m.wc+s. a< _ PC, , ty Tax: SWVICRAaarrv 1 a..~ _ 1 Mf/QF 4Z .21 1 0110 M _ir_ rs J• ° -N- M.2 E. LEGION RD. oe~ 1 \ q q e -001 U 12 11 . it >•e p 11 p / U • • s 1'L2 0 4 tt s ° qs 1y / t M IS rr. sh6' q. \\d U a O ' y I L!Y / \ \ U y a / \ a `y" gtNJ t Its • i I fi yJ` ' i t I O ~ a 4^ v i / ~ O rr J y I TV% ]y ? I U y $ y Is IIIk j ]O ? I U q. O t/ tt a i / tq ~ qS a / a I ty ® p I / Y / I I L aw.y"°u. e.wr.w. r?uw s.rwe~u. --sw- - ~..~-.a..~ (21) O - : ~ ` .R . NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E *•ff SDUTHDLD SECTION NO m E y WNmwwQ,.LiFlU1=w 061wIUI[NffYRTF. Red Property Tax Service Agency D i.wr a v.. I1.1.m r isu u. M.... w „ 'Yt soma eaum ru w a ~ widy Cellar onrhm4R T 11901 sa 14 3 mYw.M _ILl AItl qf¢. .Mww .w II01.1.1 .urte.m emuur .AflB~aEA6geMff llE tt NI _ s~ r.e. u. - s- - as wffarr n. snriff .mn. p ewer w 1000 PROPERTY IMP tana9pi W1G .wru.. I 'i ~ s¢ scc. m. in 4 mia--~-- 0 e¢ o M -N- v m s¢s „ ya i+ M in-m-m. oc ~ ~ ' a yJ b y,s o ~ d3• y yy ILL f 4 yY F~~ O o \ p>~ s ,aJ M 74 / I A M ROg in mA s SECTION ND a4 ~ NOTeE TY OF SUFFOLK © E SWTHOLD • Winser, Krist Subject: FW: Mattituck 7-11 -----Original Message----- From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:37 PM To: Pat Moore (E-mail) Subject: RE: Mattituck 7-11 Pat Your revised site plan submission received on August 27, 2009 was forwarded to our Town Engineer for comment as well as being reviewed by staff. Your application will first need to be scheduled for a work session to discuss your submission along with comments from the Town Engineer prior to being scheduled for a public hearing. To clarify, your application is not being held up to be scheduled for a public hearing. The Board is following procedure and need all necessary information they requested in their July 29, 2009 letter prior to being scheduled for a hearing. At this point the Department has just received comments from the engineer, therefore I'm formally requesting to schedule your application for a work session for Monday September 28 as you requested to be notified in advance so that you may have your engineer present. It should be noted provided you submitted all the necessary information the Planning Board has requested, the application will be recommended to be scheduled for the next available public hearing date. Let me know if you have any questions. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy.Winser0town.southold.ny.us -----Original Message----- From: Sadoo, Tamara Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:41 AM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: FW: Mattituck 7-11 -----Original Message----- From: Patricia C. Moore [mailto:pcmoorel@optonline.net] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:33 AM TO: Sadoo, Tamara Cc: George Subject: Mattituck 7-11 Sorry if Christy is working on this- could you forward my request for the public hearing to her. 1 We would respectfully request that the revised plans be plVed on a work session and be scheduled for public hearing- The HD and NYSDOT may take some time to review- we would prefer to have the public hearing on the site plan sooner then later in the event that the Board takes comments from the public which require revisions to the site plan. Otherwise we get finals for HD and NYSDOT which may not match the Planning Board approved site plan. Any changes required by the HD would be minor (relocate sanitary to driveway area) which would not affect our site plan and the NYSDOT has been involved throughout the process. Holding up the public hearing for NYSDOT & HD is unwarranted. Thank you Pat Moore 2 Ott SCOTT A. RUSSELL 4I~ JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR Tt ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD coo ` TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Far. (631) - 765 - 9015 S9,' Tel. (631) - 765 -1560 a%~y4 JAMIE.RICHTER@TOWN.SOUTHOLD.NY.US 1 w +4 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Martin H. Sidor September 11, 2009 Chairman - Planning Board g Town Hall, 53095 Main Road G \ I U Southold, New York 11971 Re: Seven Eleven Site Plan tt Crp i State Route 25 & Factory Avenue, Mattituck, NY . SCTM 1000 -142 - 01 - 27 Dear Mr. Sidor. - As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. This Site Plan has been prepared by the office of Kempey Engineering, and has a revision date of 8/21/09. Please consider the following: 1. Drawing SP-5 is a Truck Route Plan that indicates there may be times that tractor trailers will attempt to access the site from Factory Ave while traveling in a Northerly direction. To accomplish this, the trailertemplate is shown in the southbound lane moving in the wrong direction against traffic. I realize that over a 24 hour period there are times when this would not be a problem. However, approving this concept of truck movement is not recommended. This type of truck/trailer traffic should be required to have limited site access by using only the South-bound lane on Factory Ave. or West-bound lane on Route 25. 2. The existing Retaining Wall along the Easterly property line is part of the adjacent property. There is a note on Drawing SP-1 that requires this wall to be modified in the event that a cross over agreement is reached. For clarification, I wanted to make it clear that without this agreement, this wall should not be touched or altered in any way. 3. The construction of the proposed new Stacked Retaining Wall along the easterly property line should not interfere with the structural integrity of the existing retaining wall that is to remain. Any and all existing structural defects in the existing wall should be recorded by the developer prior to commencement of any work. Any and all damage to this existing wall that is a result of construction operations shall be fixed in a manner that is acceptable to the adjacent property owner. 4. Drainage calculations have been provided and the drainage design meets the minimum requirements of Town Code Section 236 for Storm-water Management. All roof structures shall have Gutters and leaders that are directly connected to the proposed drainage system and/or leaching pools by using a minimum 6" diameter traffic bearing pipe. Page 1 of 2 4._ 4 4t Martin H. Sidor, Chairman - Planning Board September 11, 2009 Re: Seven Eleven Site Plan, Mattituck, NY SCTM 1000 -142 - 01 - 27 Page 2 of 2 5. 1 know that the State DOT has reviewed this application in great detail. Has the Planning Board received a final DOT Curb Cut Permit for the work proposed herein? This item should be on file prior to final approval. 6. Who will be responsible for the relocation of utilities and the work required to construct the new comer at the intersection of Factory Ave and State Route 25? This item should be known and agreed to by all parties involved priorto final Planning Board Approval. 7. The proposed landscaping plan appears to meet the minimum requirements of Town Code. This item should be reviewed and formally approved by the Planning Board. In addition, if the proposed landscaping has not been specifically reviewed by the DOT, the planting within the State Right-of-Way should also require there approval. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. nce ly, J es A. Richter, R.A. cc: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS so P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair y 'O OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS H Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND !'`6VU Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: James Richter, Engineering Inspector From: Kristy Winser, Sr. Plannersp( u.J ) Date: September 1, 2009 Re: Revised site plan for Seven Eleven Application Name: Seven Eleven Tax Map Number: 1000-142-1-27 Location: We corner of Main Road and Factory lane Type of Application: Road Profiles (Dated: 1 Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated: 1 x_ Other fro//~~ (Dated: 9/27/09 1 Project Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 685 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635sq.ft. building on a 24,829 sq.ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Thank you for your cooperation. PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries Mr. Martin Sidor, Chairman and U Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road f P.O.Box 1179 BUG 2 ~nnq Southold, NY 11971 att: KristyWinser Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM41000-142-1-27 Dear Kristy: In response to your July 29, 2009 letter the following information is provided: 1. We have provided detail of the east side of the property, new guardrail and additional retaining wall located to the west of the existing retaining wall (see SPA). A detail of the retaining wall is shown on SP-3. Please note that the cross section drawing is a mirror image of the site plan detail. 2. On August 21, 2009 we submitted a copy of the Health Department submission (Ref. # C 10- 09-0007) 3. The site plan (SP-1) shows that 31.64 Percentage landscaping includes the existing natural vegetation. Please note that once the Health Department reviews the proposed septic tank and grease trap addition to the existing system be will know whether the existing natural vegetation will need to be replaced. If the natural vegetation is disturbed it will be replanted. In the event that the Health Department requires the existing system to be relocated the natural vegetation will not be changed. This is a small area which can be addressed without delay to our site plan review and approval. This plan incorporates all of the revisions to the site plan previously requested in your July 22, 2009 letter and submitted on July 28, 2009. Please advise me in advance when this matter will be placed on the Board's agenda for review so that I can have the design professional present to answer any questions the Board may have. V y ours, icia C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 August 21, 2009 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 RE: GAMA PROPERTIES-DEER PARK, INC. MATTITUCK 7-11 Dear Mr. Sidor and Board Members: - 5"r With reference to the above, please be. acjvisedt atN -ft documents requested by Suffolk County Health Department have,-been'submitteA.,;9.7 1em as evidenced by the enclosed copy of a memorVgVm'1rdrr my clie Thank you. Very tr ly'yours, a Patricia C. MOOfe c~- PCM/bp encls. C: Gama properties DSC Associates, In# LETTER OF TRANSMI1RAL 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon N.Y 11704 Attorney at Law DATE: 8/18/09 51020 Main Road JOB NAME: Mattituck 7-11 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Patricia Moore We are sending you X Attached _ Under separate cover via _ Shop Drawings X Prints -Plans _ Samples _ Specifications - Copy of letter -Change Order X Other Copies Date No. Description 1 8/06/09 Drawings HDA & HD-2 1 Copy of check #1031 to Suffolk County Health Dept. for $125.00 1 7/30/09 WWM-4form 1 7/28/09 SEQR Short Environmental Assessment Form 1 8/03/09 SEQRA determination from Town of Southold 1 8/18/09 WWM-083 These are transmitted as checked below _ For Approval _ Approved as submitted Resubmit _ copies for approval For your use _ Approved as noted _ Submit _ copies for approval X As requested - Returned for corrections _ return _ copies for approval FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS Originals have been sent to the Suffolk County Health Department. These copies are for your records. CC: , Signed: DIEGO STEISEL PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 7654643 August 18, 2009 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 RE: GAMA PROPERTIES-DEER PARK, INC. MATTITUCK 7-11 Dear Mr. Sidor and Board Members: With reference to the above, please be advised that the documents requested by NYS D.O.T have been submitted to them as evidenced by the enclosed copy of the forwarding letter by our engineers. Thank you. rVery ly yours, ~ ~CQ. C Nfoore ` PC 11 encls. m.~, a., C: Gama properties ~v. ,1t A G 1 9 2009 08/17/2009 15:06 51611110 GAZ REALTY INC • PAGE 02/02 Dunn Engineering Associates, RC. Gonsulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 August 13, 2009 631-288-2480 631.2882544 Fax Mr. Shaik A. Saad, PE Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety State of New York Department of Transportation State Office Building 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mark Wolfgang Re: Proposed 7-11 N/E Corner Rt. 25 @ factory Avenue Mattituok, New York NYSDOT Case No. 01-099P SCTM No. 1000-142-01-27 Dear Mr. Saad As per your letter of March 25, 2009 to Mr. Vivian Kamath of DSC Construction Corp., enclosed please find eight (8) seta of roadway and traffic signal improvement plans submitted in connection with the above project. The plans show the improvement of the radius on the northeast comer of NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue, and the traffic signal work required to accommodate this radius improvement. As indicated in the your letter, the applicant will be responsible for the radius improvement, and the traffic signal and utility work will be handled by NYSDOT under a State contract. The property dedication required to implement this improvement is also indicated on the plans. Please note that the work within the NYS Route 25 right of way associated with the construction of the new access driveway cast of the intersection is shown on the latest site plan, which will be submitted separately by the applicant. Please review this submittal, and provide us with your comments. If you have any questions, or need any further information, please call me at ( 1) 288-2480 extension 1128, or email me at vcorrado©dunn- pc.com. Sincerei , C ANGELO O CORRADO, PE Associate Engineer VC:lam L209222 / P28104 Encls. cc: George Abi Zeid, President, GAZ Realty MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Of SOP.Q. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CRFMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND l~(,'oinrtV Southold, NY Y0 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 3, 2009 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Gama Deer Park ( 7-11 Mattituck SCTM# 142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore; As discussed with you, the above mentioned amended site plan application has been reviewed where it has been determined under the State Environmental Quality Review Act that the proposed addition to and existing building is a Type II action therefore no further review is required at this time. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me in the Planning Department (631)765-1938. Sincerely, Kristy er Senior Planner MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS `~QF so~ly P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair O J~1 l~ OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G @ 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON Q~ • (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND 'YCOU,M Southold, NY 111' Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 29, 2009 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Gama Deer Park ( 7-11 Mattituck SCTM# 142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore; I'm writing as a follow up to the Planning Board work session held July 27, 2009. As discussed, no further map changes are requested at this time however additional information is necessary to further review your application and the revised site plans received July 28, 2009. Please submit the following information for consideration: 1. The parking area to the east of the building has slopes, a guardrail and a retaining wall. Submit a grading plan that clearly demonstrates proposed parking and loading for this area. 2. Provide Health Department documentation pertaining to use of existing/proposed sanitary systems as well as the grease trap proposed to the rear of the building. As we discussed, an approval from the Suffolk County Health Department will be required prior to site plan approval. Last, include a description of how this area will be serviced. 3. Please clarify the percentage of total landscaping onsite and whether this number is inclusive of the natural buffer area. As noted this number may change based on the proposed sanitary proposed in the rear buffer area therefore a landscape plan that includes this area may need to be submitted for review. Once our review is complete, Staff, and the Town Planning Board will provide additional comments during a scheduled work session. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very trul yours, Krist insel~enior Planner cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director • • Uv° PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 1] 952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Mar aret Rutkowski °MBetsey Perkins . Secretaries July 28, 2009 Mr. Martin Sider, Chairman and Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 t Southold, NY 11971 ( - att: KristyWinser - Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Dear Kristy: In accordance with our Planning Board meeting of July 27, 2009 enclosed are 7 prints of the revised site plan with the following items requested in your letter dated July 22, 2009: 1. Floor plans (7 prints) 2. Truck Template (SP-4 and SP-5) 3. Revised Elevations (A-1 and A-2) and color rendering (3 prints) 4. Sign detail (SP-I and A-1 ) 5. Parking areas revised a. removed spaces on east side closest to Rt 25 b. cross easement- parking removed per your letter (Board may recommend adding full sized spaces in cross easement since the cross easement may never be granted by adjacent owner) c. handicap space relocated d, light poles reduced in height. 6. a. Owner waiting for copy of LWRP comments b. parking stalls on west reduced from 3 spaces to 2 spaces. These spaces would be reserved for employees only c. landscaping- As discussed at meeting, the property is a developed site and we ask the Board waive the landscaping requirements. The redevelopment of the site will enhance the property and the community. The landscaping requirements in the code would require parking spaces to be eliminated. The proposed parking complies with the code and the owner is providing the required percentage of landscaping, however, it is agreed that additional parking is recommended along Rt. 25 for the proposed use. d. Truck templates have been provided and I have asked the architect to provide the additional information regarding the grade and guard rail on the east side of the property. c. The owner will take your recommendations regarding the light fixtures at the rear of the property. We will be sure to have the light fixtures comply with the "dark skies" policy. I will ask the architect to provide guidance regarding the light poles at the corner of Rt. 25 and Factory Ave., if these fixtures are not needed then we will eliminate them. f. An application to the Health Department will be submitted and additional information regarding the existing sanitary system will be provided. Please advise me in advance when this matter will be placed on the Board's agenda for review so that I can have the engineer present to answer any questions the Board may have. Very truly Y7 s, (----Patricia C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. 0 WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, July 27, 2009 4:00 p.m. Applications: Site Plans Pr& ct name: Seven Eleven _1SCTM#51000-142-1-27 - Location:_- _ n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to a single retail use (convenience store) with an addition of 685 sq. ft., for a total building area of 2,635 sq. ft. on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone. Status: New Site Plan Action: Review comments with the Planning Board. Attachments: -Staff Rem, LWRP Report and Letter to Applicant, dated 7/22/09 Project name: Joint Indust Bd. Santorini SCTM# 1000-83-2-17.3 Location: _ 3800 Duck Pond Road, Cutchogue Description: This site plan is for the proposed construction of an 18,000 sq. ft. meeting/conference facility and interior alterations of an existing motel, restaurant, pool and pool house on a conforming 12.3 acre site partially located in the Resort Residential and Agricultural Conservation Zoning Districts. Status: Site Plan Review Action: Review comments with the Planning Board. Attachments: - LWRP (hand out), Staff Report - Project name: Chase Bank - Mattituck SCTM#: 1000-14373-33.2 Location: 10300 NYS Route 25, 133'+/- east of Marlene Lane & NYS Route 25, Mattituck Description: This site plan is for the new construction of a 4,200 sq, ft. bank with two drive-through bays on a previously developed 112,647 sq. ft. (2.59 acre) parcel in both the B, General Business, and R-40, Residential Zones. Status _ New Site_Plan Action Review submission from applicant Attachments Staff Report & Letter from Applicant Winser, Kristy From: Patricia C. Moore [pcmoorel @optonline.net] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 3:38 PM To: Winser, Kristy Cc: George; dscarchitecture@optonline.net Subject: [Fwd: Re: MATTITUCK RENDERING] RE: MATrMCK RENDERING Hi Kristy- I received an email of the rendering of the Mattituck 7-11, I do not have in my office the equipment to print this rendering in color. Could you please print it for our meeting on Monday with the Board they may find this drawing useful. It is my understanding that the changes requested by the ARC have been included, as requested. I am expecting to have the revised drawings with the recommendations made to date for the work session. My client understands that there may be additional comments, however, we have tried to address all the comments made to date. Thank you Pat 1 • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS a~QF so~Ty P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND co Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE July 22, 2009 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Gama Deer Park ( 7-11), Mattituck SCTM# 142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore; I am writing as a follow up to the work session held on July 20, 2009 to discuss your site plan application and where the following determinations where made. Please submit 8 copies of the following items directly to the Planning Department for review. 1. Submit a floor plan that reflects the proposed design shown in the site plan. 2. Provide a truck template on a plan that matches the proposed site plan. The truck template should demonstrate how trucks will circulate the site and execute ingress and egress at all access points, including entering the site northbound and southbound from Factory Avenue. 3. Submit revised elevations in accordance with the ARC recommendations (see attached comments). 4. Submit Signage detail indicating only two signs (one monument style, one wall sign) that meet both the ARC and Staff recommendations: a. The sign detail should indicate colors; comply with the sign code having no internal lighting and dark sky compliant using simple goose-neck style light fixture for the signs. b. The street sign should be a monument style sign no higher than 6' in height. 5. In reference to the following items the Planning Board agreed to, you may want to wait for further comments prior to making revisions to the overall site plan: Site plan for Seven Eleven Mattituck p•2 a. The parking area along the east property line: • Remove the 2 parking stalls closest to the entrance from Route 25 and; • Note on plan "in the event the cross access agreement in place is improved, the applicant will remove existing parking in place of the access point to the property on the east side". b. As per the applicant's request, you may relocate handicap parking to the west of the front entrance of the building, provided it meets ADA specifications. c. Revise the parking light poles so they do not exceed 14 feet in height to the bulb. 6. The following items will be addressed at the next Planning Board Works session scheduled Monday July 27, 2009: a. LWRP review and recommendations. b. The required 25' foot front landscaped area along Factory Lane and 3 parking stalls along the west property line. c. There is a requirement for a 25' foot front landscape strip along the Main Road. Additionally, there is a requirement for a 5 ` foot landscape strip along the front of the building. Therefore, existing and proposed landscaping on site will be further discussed. d. The parking along the east property line: It is necessary for the Planning Board to have a complete truck template and all relevant details and dimensions of the parking area and existing guardrail for review. An alternative will be recommended to the Planning Board for their consideration. e. The lighting plan will be further discussed, including the proposed location of some light poles and proposed light fixtures on the rear of the building. f. The applicant will need to demonstrate proposed access and landscaping to the rear of the site where there is a natural buffer area having existing and proposed sanitary structures including a greasetrap. It should be noted that site plan review is a process and that additional comments and or information may be requested by the Planning Board to be submitted for review. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very trul yours, Kri'stty` Win ' Senior Planner cc: Planning Board PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 7651643 July 21, 2009 Attn: Kristy George Abizeid, et al Southold Town Planning Board RE: GAMA 7-11 PROJECT, MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD Dear Kristy & George With reference to the above and more specifically the work session held yesterday, please be advised that my understanding is to make the following changes and provide status updates: MAP CHANGES: 1. Identify the easterly parking spaces for compact cars 2. Increase the landscape buffer on westerly comer of Factory Ave. & Rte. 25 by eliminating 1 of 3 parking spaces. Eliminate northwesterly and identify 2 remaining spaces as employee parking 3. Revise floor plan to meet building design 4. Maximum height of light poles to bulb to be 14 feet 5. 2 parking spaces to be eliminated when neighbor makes improvements to cross easement 6. Change plan to provide for 2 signs; 1 wall sign and 1 free standing sign on west side New drawings of sign in accordance with ARC recommendations Remove references to additional signs on site plan 7. East side of parking, eliminate southerly 2 spaces in front of Route 25 ingress 8. Provide revised truck template to conform with proposed site plan 9. Relocate handicap spaces per 7-11's request (either far west or far east) STATUS: Provide status of Health Department approval and copy of DOT plan when available. WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, July 20, 2009 4:00 p.m. Applications: Site Plans Project name: _ Satur Farms l SCTM#x000_101-2-24.5 Location: _ 3705 Alvah's_Lane, Cutch_ogue Description: This amended agricultural site plan is to remove an existing greenhouse and replace it with an 8,558 square foot agricultural barn with loft and loading dock on a 1.837-acre parcel in the A-C Zoning District located on the west side of Alvah's Lane, approximately 1,855.07 feet south of the _ intersection of Alvah_'_s_Lane and CR_4_8, in Cutchogue. Status: Amended Site Plan_ _ Action: Review site plan submission and recommend for the Planning Board to accept the application for review and refer the application out for comment. Attachments:____ Staff Report - Project name: Seven Eleven TSCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Location: We corner of Factq~ Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck _ Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to a single retail use (convenience store) with an addition of 685 sq. ft., for a total building area of 2,635 sq. ft. on a 24,829 sq_ parcel in the Business Zone. - Status: New Site Plan Action: Review comments with the Planning Board.- `Attachments_ Staff-Report Subdivisions Project name__ _ Aries Estates/Tully SCTM#:1 1000-22-3-2 _ Location: The property is located at the westerly terminus of a private right-of-way 1 _ which extends north from Kayleigh's Court in East Marion. DThis proposal is for a standard subdivision of an 11.4418-acre parcel into two lots, where Lot 1 equals 3.7362 acres, including 1.4354 acres of open space, and Lot 2 equals 7.6786 acres, including 5.0872 acres of open space, in the R-80 Zoning District. Status: ketch Approval - - Action: Review requirements for preliminary approval and map submitted - verify _ top of bluff line Attachments: Timeline Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Project: Seven ElevenSite Plan Preparer: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: July 20, 2009 1. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: Seven Eleven SCTMN#: 1000-142-1-27 Street Location: 9945 NYS Route 25, Mattituck Hamlet: Mattituck Zoning District: Business Type of Site Plan: New Property Owner: Gama Deer Park, Inc Applicant: same Agent: Pat Moore Site Plan Prepared By: Kempey Engineering Date of Map: 10/10/08, last revised 5/18/09 II.Time line: Date of pre-submission conference: 9/23/08 Date of Submission to PB: 9/9/08- incomplete. Also required pre-submission. Date of application accepted: 11 /3/08 - referred out. Date of work sessions: 11/3/08, 3/16/09 Date of project scoping: 11/05/08 Date new application submitted: 3/6/09, scheduled for work session 3/16/09 Date PB accepted application: 6/8/09 Date application referred out: 6/11/09 Date of letters from Planning Board: 9/19/08 - Incomplete, 10/21/08- Comments sent to ZBA, 10/24/08-incomplete, 11/5/08-application accepted & referred out, 1/2/09 - Comments sent to ZBA regarding SEQR (Type II no further review), 2/10/08-no further review until revised plans that meet the code are submitted for review, 3/24/09- site plan submission dated 3/6/09 was not complete. 5/12/09 - last submission not complete, need a truck template as previously requested 3/24/09. Status: proposed addition was denied by the ZBA on 1/22/09. Revised plans submitted 3/6/08 scheduled for work session on 3/16/08. Application was not complete. Requested revisions on 3/25/09. Applicant submitted information on 4/17/09 but did not include a truck template. Advised applicant 5/12/09 that this was required and plans showing trucks on site was submitted for review on 5/22/09. The Application was scheduled for a WS on 6/8/09 where the PB formally accepted the application for review. Staff Report Seven Eleven Paae Two July 20, 2008 III. Description of Site Plan Project Construction Type: Proposed 685 sq foot addition to existing building for retail use. Zoning Determination: The Notice of Disapproval indicates the need for site plan approval For additions and alterations, converting an existing gas station and convenience store to a convenience store. The proposed meets zoning. Call of meeting: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 s.f. Gas Station/convenience store and add a 658 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,670 s.f. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24,829 s.f. parcel in the Business Zone located on the We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Building size area: 2,670sq. ft Lot coverage: 11.06% (30% allowed) Parking required: 14 @ 1/per 200sf Parking proposed: 30 (including 2 ADA compliant) Landscaping proposed: 30.66% (20% required) Front Landscape: 176% (50% required) IV. Site Analysis SEQRA CLASSIFICATION - TYPE II - no further Action This is an existing site (Gas station / Convenience store) on a 24, 829 s.f. parcel located on the corner of Factory Avenue and Main Road in Mattituck. The Waldbuams shopping center borders the subject parcel on the north and eastern property lines. Currently there is access to the site having access from the Main road and on Factory Avenue. The proposed is to remove the gas station and pumps and convert the existing 1,950 s.f building to a retail use is for Seven Eleven convenience store. The applicant originally had proposed a 750 s.f. addition to the east of the building that required variances from the Board of Appeals, all of which were denied at their January 22, 2009 Public hearing. The applicant has since submitted an amended site plan on March 6, 2009 for review. The current proposal is for a 658 s.f. addition to the front of the existing building meeting all required setbacks and the proposed use is a permitted use in the Business Zone. • • Staff Report Seven Eleven Pane Two July 20, 2008 At this point, the applicant submitted a complete site plan application in response to a March 25, 2009 and follow up April 12, 2009 letter requesting additional information. As part of the submission the applicant has provided a revised application, EAF, and LW RP that reflects the changes made to the previous plan. Also a floor plan, truck template, lighting & landscape plan, traffic analysis and loading areas were provided. V• Permits and/or Review Required From Other Agencies -referred out on 11/5/08 and Staff Recommendations: • NYS DOT -Based on 3/30/09 letter to the applicant, additional information is required. On February 11, 2009 there was a meeting with Board members, the Town engineer, staff and the applicant at the State DOT to discuss the comer radius dedication at the n/e side of the Main Road and Factory Lane intersection. This improvement was recommended and identified as necessary development in an effort to improve this corner. DOT Determination received March 30, 2009: 1. Traffic generation from the site will place more of a demand on the westbound to northbound right turn movements. Therefore, the applicant should complete radius improvements as part of the site- development. 2. With respect to relocating the utility pole and pedestrian traffic control facilities, it would be unreasonable to expect the applicant to fund these items. Instead these items will be funded through a state contract based on an approved design by the client. 3. All previous comments need to be addressed having to do with revisions to the plans and proposed signage. This is shown on the plan and is being worked out between the applicant and the DOT as part of their DOT permit. It has been agreed that the applicant will be responsible for site improvements and the cost for the radius improvements. However, the State will undertake the cost of relocating of the utility and pedestrian traffic control facilities. • Transportation Commission- It was recommend that corner radius is subject to NYSDOT approval, no parking along main road or Factory Ln, and careful consideration should be given to the scenic corridor with regard to landscaping and aesthetics. • • Staff Report - Seven Eleven Paae Three July 20, 2008 The commission has reviewed revised design and is satisfied that all its above concerns have been met and approves the project. Drainage review from Town Engineer- During the Engineering review for the first proposal, the owner was given a list of various concerns related to the development of this site. Currently, it appears that the applicant has incorporated all of the relevant engineering comments into there new design. He also noted that the applicant has satisfied all DOT issues and have reached an agreement with regard to the work in the DOT right-of-way. Therefore, the current proposal appears to meet the minimum standards required by the Town Code. The Staff recommendation is to accept the comments from the office of the Town Engineer and for the applicant to follow the road improvements recommended by the DOT. • Mattituck Fire District- Recommend that all access points allow for fire access and that all drives be cleared and maintained to meet Southold Town Code. Staff recommends for the Board to accept the Mattituck Fire District comments. • SCPC- 06/13/09, Local jurisdiction • ARC- See attached comments from the ARC. Staff would recommend for the Board to accept the comments from the Committee in relation to proposed elevations, colors, signage, landscaping and lighting. • LWRP review for consistency- (see attachment) Site Desion Elements: Parkinsa: The proposed convenience store requires 14 parking stalls based on 1 space per 200 sf. for a retail use and as proposed, the applicant is providing 30 parking stalls, two of which are ADA compliant. However, the Truck template submitted shows only 25 parking stalls having only 1 ADA compliant stall. In addition the parking on the east side Staff Report - Seven Eleven Paae Four July 20, 2008 of the building is shown differently on each plan. The site plan has 10 stalls along the east property line with the dumpster and enclosure next to the building whereas, the truck template shows parking split 4 stalls next to the building and two closes to the difficult to access these stalls provided on the east side of the building. Staff recommends that the parking arrangement proposed on the site plan works better for internal circulation of the site but, the parking stalls proposed closest to the entrance on the Main road along the east property line should be removed for safety measures. Site circulation: (see comparison of traffic/parking of other sites submitted for the Boards consideration) There is only one ingress / egress access point onto the Main Road having right turns only and another access point on Factory Avenue. A truck Template has been submitted for review. Although the template provided is for an 18 wheeler, it does not demonstrate adequate circulation due to the template shows the dumpster and access aisle on the east side of the building reversed from the site plan that shows trucks may not be able to manipulate the turn around the building adequately. Staff recommendation is for the applicant to submit a revised template for review. Liahtina: A lighting plan has been submitted and indicates that some of the proposed lighting may need to be revised as to only illuminate the subject parcel. The Staff recommendation is for the applicant to submit a revised lighting plan that incorporates the ARC comments not showing light pollution spilling onto adjacent sites and/ or ROW. Landscapina: As proposed the applicant is proposing 30% overall landscaping on site. Also, the applicant has amended their Landscape plan to incorporate the DOT comments of using perennial and evergreen type plantings. Staff would recommend for the Board to accept the overall concept with the condition that they incorporate both the ARC and LW RP recommendations into the landscape plan. VI: Materials to aid in review Aerial view of property, Architectural Samples and drawings Page 1 of 1 i Winser, Kristy From: Richter, Jamie Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 12:33 PM To: Winser, Kristy Cc: Harris, Peter Subject: 7-11 Factory Ave R Route 25, Mattituck Dear Kristy: As per our conversation regarding the 7-11 in Mattituck, please consider the following: The current proposal for this site is to develop the property for use as a 7-11 Convenience Store. Previously, the applicant applied for a site plan to construct a Gas Station / Convenience Store / Car Wash. During the Engineering review for the first proposal, the owner was given a list of various concerns related to the development of this site. Currently, it appears that the applicant has incorporated all of the relevant engineering comments into there new design. I have also been informed that the applicant has satisfied all DOT issues and have reached an agreement with regard to the work in the DOT right-of-way. Therefore, the current proposal appears to meet the minimum standards required by the Town Code. Please do not consider this an approval by any other agency having jurisdiction in this matter. Sincerely, James A. Richter Office of the Engineer 631-765-1560 7/17/2009 OFFICE LOCATION: rl~~f SN7/t MAILING ADDRESS: J~ Town Hall Annex O P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 * Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 i~ Fax: 631765-3136 ~~y00UNT'I LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Martin Sidor, Chair Members of the Southold Planning Board - From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: July 17, 2009 Re: Proposed Site Plan for 7-Eleven, Inc. SCTM #1000-142.-1iC7 Zone: B This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 685 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635sq.ft. building on a 24,829 sq.ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department as well as the records available to me, it is my determination that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the Planning Board consider the following best management practices in site design: Policy Standards 3.1 Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. A. Minimize introduction of structural design components (including utility lines, lighting, signage and fencing) which would be discordant with existing natural scenic components and character. The subject parcel is zoned General Business and is currently improved with a gas station and convenience store. Surrounding land use in the immediate vicinity is retail. The proposed architectural elevations coupled with the proposed landscaping improve upon the existing scenic components and general character of the area. a The Lighting Plan (PH-1) proposes metal halide lighting; it is recommended that the Board consider requiring high pressure sodium.lighting to further preserve the dark sky. Additionally the Lighting Plan (PH-1) and the Landscape Notes indicated on the plat labeled SP-2 proposes lighting density and placement that do not correspond. It is recommended that the Board re- assess the density and placement of all lighting on-site to further preserve the night sky. C. Screen components of development which detract from visual quality. See the above comments. D. Use appropriate siting, scales, forms, and materials to ensure that structures are compatible with and add interest to existing scenic components. See the above comments. E. Preserve existing vegetation and establish new indigenous vegetation to enhance scenic quality: The property and the proposed structure are directly visible from New York State 25, a New York State designated scenic byway. The applicant proposes to mitigate the scenic impacts through on-site landscaping. To further the above policy and Policy 5, "Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold" and protect and improve the water quality and supply in the area; the following best management practices are recommended: 1. The Landscaping Notes on the plat labeled SP2 indicate that street trees will be planted 30' on center. The locations of the street trees in relation to site build-out are not shown. It is recommended that the Board require the locations of the street trees be shown on the plat. 2. Require that the "existing natural vegetation" that occurs on the northern property boundary remain into perpetuity as a natural vegetated buffer to screen the rear of the building. 3. Require that all landscaped areas use indigenous, drought tolerant vegetation in landscaping to minimize irrigation and the use of synthetic fertilizers and herbicides on the parcel. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Planning Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner File Winser, Kristy From: Patricia C. Moore [pcmoore1 @optonline.net] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:54 PM To: Winser, Kristy Cc: George Subject: Mattituck 7-11 Good Morning Kristy, hope you had a good 4th. I reviewed the 7-11 file on Thursday (7/2/09) and I noticed the following: 1. LWRP referral was made on 12/4/08 but no response has been received as of 7/2 (LWRP has 30 days to respond & is not intended to delay approvals) this application can proceed without LWRP. 2. Referral to Town Engineer 11/5/08- no response yet. I spoke to Jamie Richter, Town Engineer. He advised that he and the transportation committee had already reviewed this application- their recommendations were to follow the road improvements recommended by the NYSDOT- Since these improvements are being reviewed and coordinated by DOT he was satisfied. I asked him to please communicate this to you so that you can mark your file accordingly. 3. SCPC- referral 11/5/08- response was 12/15/08 but they identified this project as a "special permit"-they determined that the special exception was for "local determination". The convenience store use is a permitted use. You may have referred this project again on 6/2/09 - they have 30 days to respond- GML 239-m- we may legally proceed with the site plan application 4. NYSDOT- the owner and. NYSDOT are in agreement, Dunn Engineering is preparing the site plan in accordance with DOT recommendations. The curb cuts as shown on the site plan should not change from the existing plan. Our site plan could be approved subject to NYSDOT approval. 5. We need a final decision from the Planning board on the location of the parking spaces along the east side- we proposed one design, however, the truck diagram recommends moving the dumpster and some parking spaces. Since the truck deliveries to a convenience store are so few, the Board may prefer to keep the parking as originally shown. 6. Fire Dept. has submitted their response- fire protection is adequate. 7. ARC- we met with the ARC and the ARC made some recommendations which we will accept. I am awaiting the color & material chart for one member to review. The design of the building was acceptable to the ARC- we made some minor changes to the porch columns. The changes are being prepared. You should have the hand drawn changes to the design discussed at the ARC meeting in your file ( or the ARC's file) If there is anything else please let me know. My client is anxious to improve the property. Thank you. Pat Moore This owner has gone through three different projects- first a car wash and now 7-11 (design 1 with variance and 2- no variance). Please schedule this site plan for a public hearing. 1 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK • STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING THOMAS A. ISLES, A.I.C.P DIRECTOR OF PLANNING July 9, 2009 Town of Southold Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11935 Att: Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Dear Ms. Winser: Pursuant to Section 2391 & in of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan/special exception which has been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan S.C.T.M. No. Seven Eleven Store (Mattituck) 100014200 0100 027000 Local File No. N/A NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. w..:... Very truly youts, onas A. Isles, AICP r'ofPlannin JUL 13 dre P. Freleng - - CMef P anner APF:ds LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. -4TH FLOOR P. 0. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5191 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 2009-07-01 16:54 N R BRASMi$ 6317346235» P 1/1 SOUTHOLD TRANSPORIrx-rION COMMISSION ~ Town Moll P. 0. am 1179 53095 Main Road 6outlioM,NV11971-0959 PM1ona (631) 765-1938 FU(631)765-3136 TO: Ms. Heather Lanza Planning Director FROM: Neboysha R Brashi~ f Chairman DATE: July 1, 2009 RE: 7-11 Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM #:1000-142-1-27 The Cotmission reviewed project proposal throe times - July 31 & August 28, 2006 as well as June 25, 2007 in its previous incarnation as the Warex Project. Another review was held regarding the recent 7-11 project revision submission on June 29, 2009. The Commission is satisfied that all its concerns have been met and approves the project. t U'._ = 2 2009 w- %ATTITUCK FIRE DISTRA PO BOX 666, PIKE STREET MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952-0666 Commissioners David F. Haas, Chairman John C. Harrison, Secretary Barbara Dickerson, Treasurer Norman A. Reilly, Jr., Sr., Vice Chairman Martin L Griffin Lloyd H. Relsenberg William G. Young June 26, 2009 Southold Town Planning Board Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner i P O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 j Re: Seven Eleven I NYS Rte 25, Mattituck, NY - i SCTM#: 1000-142-1-27 Dear Ms. Winser; The Board of Fire Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District reviewed the above mentioned site plan and make no additional recommendations other than that all drives be cleared and maintained to meet Southold Town Code. If you require any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, o n C. Harrison Secretary/Fire District Manager cc: Board of Fire Commissioners Chief Office (631) 298-8837 Facsimile (631) 298-8841 • Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee Minutes 4:00p.m., June 18, 2009 Town Hall Annex Executive Board Room Members Present: Sandford Hanauer, Chairman; Herbert Ernest; Joseph Lee; Ronald McGreevy; Howard Meinke; Nicholas Planamento; Mark Schwartz; Kristy Winser, Planner; Elizabeth Cantrell, Secretary. The minutes for the February 12, 2009 meeting were approved. Introduction: All applicants will give a presentation consisting of drawings, exterior materials samples and other information required by the Planning Department to the Committee. The Committee will ask questions and make suggestions as part of a general discussion with each applicant. Final recommendations from the ARC will be presented to the Planning Board in the ARC Meeting Minutes, and be made part of the Planning file for that application. The Planning Board will consider these recommendations, together with all comments from other agencies, and provide the applicant with a comprehensive written list of its requested revisions. New Applications: • N&L Properties, LP SCTM #1000-73-2-4 Kirk Lehman, Architect and Charles Angona, Architect from AML Architecture presented this project to the committee. The Committee recommends this project is acceptable as submitted. Motion made and seconded. All in favor. • Seven-Eleven, Mattituck SCTM # 1000-142-1-27 Patricia C. Moore, Esq., Don Cannetti, Construction Consultant and Joey Carmine, Construction Consultant presented this project to the committee. The Committee is recommendine the following modifications to the current project plan: o The street sign should be a monument style sign with no internal lighting and with the suggested use of a Dark Sky compliant simple goose-neck style light fixture on the sign. o The street sign is not to exceed more than 6' in height. o The use of a stone facade matching the building at the base of the street sign. • 0 o The use of a natural split-shake shingle on all of the gables on the building, as suggested by Mr. Cannetti, Construction Consultant. o The use of Dark Sky compliant simple goose-neck style parking lot lighting fixtures without scrolling along the neck. o The use of 10" square columns along the front of the building with a stone pedestal at the base of each column to complement the stone on the building. o Thicken the front arches between each column to complement the wider columns. o Change the colors of the building to the Nantucket Stacked Stone option with a complementing light gray-toned hearty plank above the stone. Motion made and seconded. All in favor. A motion was made to close the meeting at 5:40p.m. All in favor. Elizabeth Cantrell, Secretary i oacdmc Haan s`" n awn. emc../ r. Wed :mia:'e IT 11 11 IN 11 1111 11 110 1111 11111 1111 111 1111111 Hill III I'll IT Ij 111 111111 11 HIT I rrsi. «aF~q/ %pma~i//.c. To -TT „K umc -.d .'s.dc oars I=LL LULL oaAne . oxAOe ca.M6 ,x ' .~.Spd ..m. wc. 1 WUIil P1BVAlION - A_] 90118 W' Id' V.PF cwI • tt Y?L .d W3,. yrt. dP ~9O R ulp rW«M « - ..~d NPIU. 11 11 IT 11 11 if 11 11 If 11 11 9 1 11 IT I I; it Y «00.. a/,. \LC. !a/ .t/ v,P ~ ~ utd .WlKw i Cp d 1111 11 fill 11 1111 11 1111 11 11 If 11 Hill 11 11 if 11 1111 if 111111 111111 11 IT 11 1111 ~ L6,~}6}6. .Y G~iO \ Vn6 a0n[ ~ nd a [uC. uwf GRADE ~ ()RAOe NIEMOCIYR lmr(Y~ P o s .o ao.r.nl •i I R 7•_0• ~.wv W ru , o Y INF T I 0. r L D68CRIPTpi QTY m m ROLLER GRILLS 2 SANDWICH CASE CID EXT VAULTDOORS 10 LOWTEWDOORS 3 ICE h£RCHANDISER 1 NOVELTY CASE SAKERYCASES 2 SLURPEE BARRELS 8 FULL HOT FOODS YES PARTALHOTFOODS N06IBL.4f' ol A In 111111113 •_0• jGONDOLA TLNITS 26 n END CAPS 3 HIGHWALLS 2 TOTAL: 31 TOTAL SQ FT 2870 SELLING FLOOR SQ FT 1793 ~i i O wrr rt e FLOOR PLAN E u SC: N" 1 a L rim Winser, Kristy From: Patricia C. Moore [pcmoorel@optonline.neq Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 12:57 PM To: Winser, Kristy Cc: George Subject: Re: FW: NYSDOT Case 01-099P, Propose 7 - 11, NY 25 Mattituck Hi Kristy- thank you that clarifies your request. I have forwarded your comments to the owner. We will be sure that the engineers contact the - DOT to be sure they have what they need. Thank you Pat Winser, Kristy wrote: > Pat, > I understand that you revised your comments based on our letter dated 3/24/09 and the DOT comments. I sent 1 copy of the site plan last revised on 4/13/09 to the DOT for Comment as required by code. They are saying that they need you to submit 8 copies of ti this plan for their review and comment. If you say you submitted them already please N contact Mark Wolfgang @ (631) 952-7973 to confirm they received your plans. > Thank you. > Kristy Winser > Senior Planner > Town of Southold Planning Department > P.O. Box 1179 > 53095 Main Road > Southold, New York > Phone: (631) 765-1938 > Fax: (631) 765-3136 > Kristy.Winser@town.southold.ny.us > -----Original Message----- > From: Patricia C. Moore [mailto:pcmoorel@optonline.net] > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 12:29 PM > To: Winser, Kristy > Cc: George > Subject: Re: FW: NYSDOT Case 01-099P, Propose 7 - 11, NY 25 Mattituck > This letter was received in March and the site plan revised right away > and resubmitted . The site plan which is being referred out conforms > with their recommendations. > Please let me know if you do not find the revised plans- they should be > in your file. > Thank you > Pat > Winser, Kristy wrote: Pat, FYI on this. 8 copies of your revised plans will need to be submitted to the State DOT for Comment. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road 1 Southold, New York • • Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy.Winser@town.southold.ny.us -----Original Message----- From: Mark Wolfgang [mailto:mwolfgang@dot.state.ny.us) Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:34 PM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: NYSDOT Case 01-099P, Propose 7 - 11, NY 25 Mattituck Hi Kristy, Thank you for sharing one (1) copy of the plans with us. We had previously sent a letter to Mr. Kamuth dated 3/25/09 (copy attached) requesting eight (8) copies of revised plans to review and comment on. To date he has not responded to that letter. In order for us to provide comments regarding proposals for this site Mr. Kamuth should provide us with eight (8) copies of complete plan sets. Thanks, Mark Mark D. Wolfgang Civil Engineer I NYSDOT, Region 10 Traffic Engineering and Safety 250 Veterans Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Telephone: (631) 952-7973 Mobil: (631) 978-1671 Fax: (631) 952-4967 2 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS S0Ury~ So P.O. ,ox 1179 1 971 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~Q l0 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWN END OIiYCt7U ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Scott A. Russell, Supervisor 49p Members of the Town Board Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk cc: Town Attorney From: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: June 11, 2009 Re: Site Plan for Seven Eleven, Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and a determination of jurisdiction, if applicable. Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 658 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635sq.ft. building on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Thank you for your cooperation. c5ubF too 05Rbi . MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS pF SOpryOlo Southold, s ox 117 MARTIN H. D 971 Chair 4 41 OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS co ~e Town Hall Annex KE GEORGE D. SOLOMON NNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWN END OIyC~U (cor. Main Rd. NY NV, Southold, Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Memorandum To: Sanford Hanauer, Chairman Southold Town Architectural Review Committee From: Kristy Winser Date: November 5, 2008 RE: Request for Review and Comments on Site Plan known as Seven Eleven, Mattituck The Planning Board refers this site plan application to your agency for your review and comments. It should be noted that this is a different proposal from your previous review. This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 658 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635sq.ft. building on a 24,829 sq.ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Thank you. Encl: Site Plan Application and Site Plan Elevations 0 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~pF SOUjy P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~Q~ Old Southold, NY 11971 Chair lI OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS ro Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON • ~O JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND IiYCOU(cor. M Southold, NY Ave.) f11, Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 11, 2009 New York State Department of Transportation 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Attention: Mr. Mark Wolfgang Re: Comments on the Site Plan for Seven Eleven, Mattituck Located: n/e Corner of Factory Avenue & Main Road SCTM 1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: Business Dear Mr. Wolfgang: The following site plan is being referred to you for comments. It should be noted that this is a different proposal from your previous review and believe your already are reviewing the following amended proposal. This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 658 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635sq.ft. building on a 24,829 sq.ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the We comer of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, LkD Kristy Win Senior Planner Encl: 1 Site Plan Site Plan Application Environmental Assessment Form ~ L) b" -F 100 . MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~pF SOUjy P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~0~ Ol0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair 4 41 OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS C42 Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS - 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON % COUrm,~ (cor. Main Rd. & NY ga Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND n 1, Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Transportation Commission Members From: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: June 11, 2009 Subject: New Site Plan for the Proposed Seven Eleven, Mattituck Located at the Comer of Main Road and Factory Avenue The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and a determination of jurisdiction. It should be noted that this is a different proposal from your previous review. Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 658 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635sq.ft. building on a 24,829 sq.ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Thank you for your cooperation. Please feel free to call me with any questions or comments regarding the above. • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS so~jyo Southold ox 1179 11971 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~Q fO Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS H Town Hall Annear KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON ( JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND COU01 cor. MaiSo Rd.& a NY Ave.) Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator From: Kristy Winser Senior Planner Date: June 11, 2009 Re: Site plan application for Seven Eleven SCTM#1000-142-1-27 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. It should be noted that this is a different proposal from your previous review. The file is available at your convenience. Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 658 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635sq.ft. building on a 24,829 sq.ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the n/e comer of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Thank you for your cooperation. • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS pf SOpryo Sou h Idox 1179 1971 MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair 41 41 OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS CA Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND yCOU Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 11, 2009 Suffolk County Planning Commission Mr. Andrew P. Freleng, AICP, Chief Planner H. Lee Dennison Building, 4th Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788-0099 Re: Planning Commission Comments on the Site Plan for Seven Eleven Store Located on We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck SCTM 1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: Business Dear Mr. Freleng: Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan is being referred to you for comments. It should be noted that this is a different proposal from your previous review. Attached are the site plan, EAF and site plan application. This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 658 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635sq.ft. building on a 24,829 sq.ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the n/e comer of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCI'M#1000-142-1-27 If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, wvY~tL.~" Kristyy Wi Senior Planner Enc. 1 Site Plan Site Plan Application Environmental Assessment Form MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~~pF SOpj~o So P O is ox1 us71 MARTIN H. SIDOR Char OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS CA Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE C JOSEPH L. SOLOMON :OIyC (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) OU Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1838 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Memorandum To: James Richter From: Kristy Winser Date: June 11, 2009 Re: Request for Review on Site Plan for Seven Eleven, Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Type of Application Sketch Site Plan (Dated: 1 Preliminary Site Plan (Dated: x_ Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated: x 1 Other (AS BUILT) (Dated: 1 Project Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 658 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635sq.ft. building on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 * It should be noted that this is a different proposal from your previous review. • • ~L) L4 L48. MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~~Of SGSoP.O. Box 1179 11971 MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ~'YCpU Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 11, 2009 Mr. John Harrison c/o Mattituck Fire District P.O. Box 666 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Request for Review on Site Plan for Seven Eleven, Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Harrison: The enclosed site plan application, referenced above, is being referred to you for fire access review. It should be noted that this is a different proposal from your previous review. Please respond with your recommendations at your earliest convenience. This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 658 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635sq.ft. building on a 24,829 sq.ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, ICrist ser Senior Planner enc. site plan application site plan • 0 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNI MARTIN H. NG BOARD MEMBERS so P.O. Box 1179 NY 11971 Chair .1L OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS N Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND liyCO (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) USouthold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 9, 2009 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Game Deer Park ( 7-11 Mattituck SCTM# 142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore; I'm writing to inform you that your site plan application was formally accepted for review during a Planning Board work session held June 8, 2009. The amended application has been referred to involved agencies under the general site plan regulations pursuant to Section 280-131(C) of the Town Code. Additional comments will be provided following full review by Staff, the Town Planning Board, Town Departments and involved/interested agencies. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, OKristy Winser Senior Planner cc: Planning Board • r WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, June 8, 2009 4:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. Applications Site Plans Project name: Harbes Family Winery SCTM#: 1000-120-1~ & 112--1-7.1 Location: The northwest corner of Sound Avenue and Hallock Avenue in Mattituck Description: This site plan is for the addition of retail winery and wine production facilities to an existing farm stand using existing buildings on site. In addition, the site provides existing parking of 28 spaces and provides new parking of 46 spaces along with a new loading area for trucks. The overall property is 15.61 acres in the A-C Zone. Status: Application sent to the Suffolk County Planning Department for comment. Action: Review SCPC comments. The Board requested comments back from the SCPC prior to making a determination on the width of the R.O.W. known as Hallock Lane. Attachments: Suffolk County Planning Comments Project name: Seven Eleven, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Location: Located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store and add a 685 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,635 sq. ft. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24, 829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone. Status: The Zoning Board of Appeals denied variances requested by the applicant and the applicant has now submitted amended plans that do not require variance relief for review. Action: Up-date the Planning Board and review the plans. Request that the Planning Board consider accepting the application for review and begin the referral process. Attachments: Staff Report Subdivisions Project name: Karen Mazzaferro SCTM#: 1000-63-1-12 Location: 1450 Horton's Lane, on the east side of Horton's Lane, in Southold Description: This proposed standard subdivision is to subdivide a 4.28-acre parcel into 3 lots, where Lot 1 equals 41, 994 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 43,631 sq. ft., and Lot 3 equals 90, 023 sq. ft, in the R-40 Zoning District. Status: Open - Action: Review comments from external and internal departments/agencies. Attachments: Packet of Comments PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries May 21, 2009 ~.~v..~........,n_~,.,.,.~...,M..,...,.,., .w, _ fr Mr. Martin Sidor, Chairman and ; t; j U Ls E Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road j P.O.Box 1179 MAY 2 2 2009 Southold, NY 11971 att: KristyWinser Re: LAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 $ Dear Mr. Sidor: " . In accordance with Kristy Winser's May 12, 2009 request, herein is the truck template and detail of the corner radius which has been designed in accordance with the NYSDOT requirements. All previously requested items were submitted on April I Th The DOT has verbally approved the access and radius design but is waiting for the Town. As to the truck template, the truck template on the site plan shows full size tractor trailers. However, 7-11 stores receive deliveries from a designated distribution center in Suffolk County, McClean Distribution Center. We know the size of our delivery trucks: daily deliveries are made with 17' trucks; twice a week deliveries are no larger then 54'; three times a week deliveries use trucks which are 24' to 26' in length. As you know the site is presently a gas station with a multiple dispenser gasoline pump station and a large canopy, multiple bay repair shop and approved convenience store. The existing gas station receives gasoline deliveries and supplies with much larger trucks then is proposed for the convenience store. The standard gasoline truck used for multiple station delivery ranges in size from 60' to 75' . This project is a benefit to the community. This project reduces the number of uses on the site to one convenience store. The size of the proposed 7-11 convenience store is comparable to the three other 7-11 stores within the Town of Southold, this site offers more parking and better site circulation then the other approved convenience stores throughout Southold Town. The redevelopment of this site will also improve existing offsite nonconforming parking and traffic issues which would not otherwise be addressed. We ask that this matter continue to be reviewed without delay. Y • • Please advise me in advance when this matter will be placed on the Board's agenda so that I can have the engineer and architect at the meeting. Very truly-y rs, -Patricia C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. 6 4) MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~apf SOUjyo Southold ox 1179 11971 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~0 lw Chair w.IL OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND yC~Un 11 Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 12, 2009 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia C Moore Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Gama Deer Park (Seven Eleven), Mattituck SCTM# 142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore; I'm writing in response to your site plan submission and letter dated April 17, 2009 for the above referenced project. As per the request from the Planning Board and item 3 of your letter, a truck template and detail of the comer radius improvement detail should have been included. The Planning Board requested a truck template in a letter dated March 24, 2009 and this information requested is necessary for the Planning Board to be able to determine that the site design is such that the health, welfare and safety of the public is safeguarded. Also, detail of the corner radius improvement is to be submitted for review and is necessary for coordination with the N.Y.S. Department of Transportation. At this point, your application is not complete and the Planning Board cannot process the application further until the requested information is submitted for review. If you should have any questions, contact me anytime. Thank you. Sincerely, / Kristy Winser Senior Planner cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 10:20 AM To: Pat Moore (E-mail) Subject: 7-11 Pat, I hope you had a good vacation. I got your message regarding 7-11 and I plan to schedule the application for a work session for Tues May 26th, 2009. 1 will sent a letter confirming this later in the week. Have a good day. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy. W inser(a)town. southold.ny. us 1 l~ PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries April 16, 2009 Mr. Martin Sidor, Chairman and Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 att: KristyWinser Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Dear Kristy: In accordance with my April 6, 2009 submission enclosed are the following items requested in your letter dated March 24, 2009: 1. Photometric lighting and light fixture cut sheet (7 sets) 2. Due to the revised truck loading area on the east side of building provided on April 6, 2009 the engineered site plan required revisions. The landscaping plan was also revised in accordance with the truck loading area. Enclosed are 7 sets of the revised site plan with the loading area. Please advise me in advance when this matter will be placed on the Board's agenda for review so that I can have the engineer present to answer any questions the Board may have. L21cirulya rsC. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. Vivian Kamath PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey_Perkins Secretaries April 6, 2009 - Mr. Martin Sidor, Chairman and A`r'k 7 Z 09 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179- Southold, NY 11971 ~ att: KristyWinser i-/ - Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11),Matt#tfick'_ SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Kristy: Enclosed are the following items requested in your letter dated March 24, 2009: 1. Revised plan application, EAF and LWRP which reflect the changes to the site plan previously submitted. 2. Floor plan 3. Truck template for on and off site circulation of truck. The design of the curb cut on NYS Rt 25 is within the jurisdiction of the NYSDOT. The proposed curb cut complies with NYSDOT standards. Based on their expertise on traffic generation from the site of all vehicles (including trucks) from the property, specifically as to westbound to northbound right turn movements, the NYSDOT has recommended that the radius ofthe northeast corner of NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue be improved as previously recommended and designed on the plans. The owner has agreed to these improvements and possible dedication. The NYSDOT has agreed that relocation of utility and pedestrian traffic control facilities required to accommodate the radius improvements will be funded through the NY State contract. 4. Photometric lighting and light fixture cut sheet (to follow) 5. Truck loading area on east side of building - drawn on a separate sheet (attached) 6. Comparison of existing traffic pattern of the site to that of the proposed use (attached) Ve urs, P is C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. Vivian Kamath flecees~~% STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION TEN ZSO VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 1 1788 www.nysdot.gov SUBIMAL CHAKRASORTI, PE. ASTRID C. GLYNN REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER March 25, 2009 Mr. Vivian Kamafb DSC Construction Corp. 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Your March 3, 2009 Submission Proposed Convenience Store 1 9945 Main Road J NY 25, Mattituck 'SCTM 1000-14200-0100-027000 Our Case No. 01-099P Dear Mr. Kamath: This is in regard to the information for the referenced project which was submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site work and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. We have considered the information that you provided us concerning the cost estimate for all the requested improvements at the intersection of NY 25 and Factory Avenue. While we appreciate the costs associated with site development mitigation, we must also consider what would be a reasonable request to offset the impact associated with a new or re-developed site. In the case at hand, it is reasonable to assume that traffic generation from the site will place more of a demand on the westbound to northbound right turn movements. The intersection radius design at this location is substandard; therefore, radius improvements appear to be a reasonable mitigation option at this location and we maintain our comment that it should be completed as part of the site re-development. 2. We have also considered the costs associated with the re-location of utility and pedestrian traffic control facilities. We have determined it may be unreasonable to expect your client to fund these items; therefore, we will have the utility and pedestrian traffic control Mr. Vivian Kamath March 25, 2009 Page 2 of 2 facilities funded through a State contract, based on an approved design provided by your client. We would expect your client to work with the utility companies to lay out the re- located facilities as part of the design plan provided to us for this site. The plans should also include the design to re-locate the pedestrian traffic control facilities. If necessary, the plan should provide for any property dedications or easements necessary to improve the intersection radius and any overhead encroachments of utility facilities. 3. All other comments from our previous letters should be addressed. Please submit eight (8) copies of revised plans for our review. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject Case Number and County Tax Map number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By Shaik A. Saad SHAIK A. SAAR, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Peter Hams, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Ir. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:ajf DSC CONSTRUCTION CORP 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY WEST BABYLON, N.Y. - 11704 631 321 7777 03/03/2009 " FEG. TRAffiC ENG. DE'-'- Mark Wolfgang T.C 3 S ED. PAGR. FP.! F_'.1TS, Civil Engineer 1 TRAEFlC CONTROL tAV_`Ft' E, U.> Design Review/Permits Unit N.Y.S. Office Building MAR 062009 250 Veterans Highway _ Hauppauge, NY 11788-5518 ~ v edPL B DEVELOP. to t'; o.i S.r t;A: DESIGN i:C AL I 6p; Dear Mr. Wolfgang, D PERMITS & MVI MGR. i In continuation to our telephonic talk, we are enclosing 5 copies of the estimate for the design & construction of the improvements at the N/E corner of Route 25 & Factory Avenue. This does not include the 2 utility poles, one which belongs to Verizon and the other to LIPA. We kindly request you to review the same. Our client, as told earlier is prepared to dedicate the land required for the improvement and also pay a portion of the cost of improvements up to $20,000. We feel that any cost above that would be unreasonable and our client may not be able to absorb in a small project like a 7-11. We would be glad if you could review this at the earliest and arrange for a meeting with us. Thank you. Vivia yamatoh"o DSC COSTRUCTION CORP. Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. ComuMrp Engkn 66 Main street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11678 631.288-2480 631-288.2544 Fax February 25, 2009 Mr. Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp. 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Re: Transportation Engineering Services Proposed Convenience Store N/E Corner NYS Rte. 25 at Factory Ave Mattituck, NY Dear Mr. Kamath: In accordance with your request, Dunn Engineering Associates PC, (DEA)is pleased to present this proposal for professional engineering services in connection with the above proposed project, located on the northeast comer of Main Road (NYS Route25) at Factory Avenue, in Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. At present, the property contains a gasoline station, with a disused service facility and a small convenience store. The project envisions the removal of the existing uses and the development of a 7-11 convenience store. As discussed, NYSDOT has requested that the project applicant provide off-site roadway improvements to improve the curb radius at the northeast comerof the intersection ofNYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue. At your request, we have prepared a proposal to provide the detailed design for the improvements, and a preliminary cost estimate for the anticipated roadway and traffic signal improvements. Construction Cost Estimate The cost to construct the roadway and traffic signal improvements required by NYSDOT has been estimated at $41,000.00, not including the cost of the property dedication required to accommodate the improvement. This estimate is based on the following: Highway Work Excavation and Subbase for Roadway & Sidewalk Curb and Sidewalk Including Detectable Warnings Roadway Pavement with NYSDOT Section Sawcutting Pavement & Sidewalk Mr. Vivian Kamath February 25, 2009 Page 2 Pavement Markings Including Removal of Existing Markings Maintenance and Protection of Traffic Traffic Signal Rork Relocate Pedestrian Pole on new foundation Install new pedestrian signals with countdown timers Wiring for Pedestrian signals Remove one pullbox, install one pullbox (includes new conduit between new pullbox and existing conduit) Relocate Detector wiring to new utility pole location (includes new wiring from NYT 345 to relocated pole, riser, and messenger cable) This estimate does not include the cost to relocate the utility pole located on this comer. Cost to perform this relocation should be obtained directly from the utility that owns the pole. As previously discussed, since it is in the interest of both the Town and the NYSDOT that the radius be improved, we recommend investigating whether these municipalities might be willing to have the utilitypoles relocated at no cost to the applicant. Note also that highway and traffic signal work permits will be required from NYSDOT to perform the work, and NYSDOT will review and approve the design. Should their review result in substantive changes to the design, this cost estimate may change. Finally, NYSDOT may require that you or the contractor provide qualified construction inspection services during the construction phase of the project. The cost for construction inspection is not included in this estimate. Design Cost Estimate DEA will prepare a plan set providing detailed design for the off-site roadway and traffic signal work required by NYSDOT. The design will be prepared using NYSDOT specifications, and will be suitable for obtaining the required highway and traffic signal work permits from NYSDOT. A Maintenance and Protection of Traffic (MPT) plan will be included. Utility relocations will be shown on the plans as to be performed by others. The plans will be submitted to NYSDOT on your behalf for review and comment. Upon receipt of comments from NYSDOT, the plans will be revised, and resubmitted. At that time, the construction cost estimate will be updated and submitted to NYSDOT for use in determining the bond amount required for issuance of the necessary permits. It is assumed that the contractors performing the work will provide the necessary bonds and permit applications, and will obtain the permits from NYSDOT, as is their preference. Mr. Vivian Kamath February 25, 2009 Page 3 Note also that it is assumed that the AutoCAD file used in preparing the site plan will be made available to us for use in the design, and that no additional field survey will be required. If additional survey is neoded, it will be provided by others, or by our sister firm, Norton Brothers Dunn, at your preference. The cost to provide these services shall be $4,920.00, payable upon initial submittal of the plans to NYSDOT. Upon receipt of review comments from NYSDOT, the plans will be revised and resubmitted in a timely fashion. It is anticipated that all commcnts will be satisfactorily addressed in this resubmission. However, should NYSDOT require additional revisions not reflected in their original review, the cost to provide those revisions will be based on the time spent by DEA staff according to the following rate schedule: Rate Schedule Principal Partner $205/hr. Principal $195/hr. Associate $145/hr. Project Engineer $135/hr. Senior Engineer $115/hr. Engineer $100/hr. Senior Drafter/Assistant Engineer $ 95/hr. Principal Technician/Junior Engineer $ 65/hr. Senior Technician $ 40/hr. Technician $ 35/hr. Word Processor Specialist $ 90/11r. In light of our ongoing professional relationship, we do not require a retainer to begin this work. Please return a signed copy of this agreement for our files. Our firm is available to perform whatever additional tasks you may request to be sure that we are accommodating your needs. I trust that our proposal meets with your approval. If you have any questions or any suggested modifications, please contact me so that you can be assured that our professional engineering services will be accomplished to your full satisfaction. Mr. Vivian Kamath February 25, 2009 Page 4 We look forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely, RONALD HILL, P.E. Principal RII: VC:as Al 729 / P28104.99 AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED: By: Dated: r • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Qf SOUjyo soot O is ox1 1971 MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y bw Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~0 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON 'M (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ycoul 1 , Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 March 24, 2009 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia C Moore Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Game Deer Park (Seven Eleven), Mattituck SCTM# 142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore; I'm writing in response to your revised site plan submission dated March 6, 2009 and as a follow up to the work session held on March 16, 2009, where the status of your application was discussed. For the Planning Board to consider your site plan complete, the following items will need to be submitted for review. 1. A revised site plan application, EAF, and LWRP form are required to reflect the changes that have been made to the overall site plan. 2. A floor plan. 3. A truck template for review for on and off site circulation of truck. 4. Submit photometric lighting plan and lighting fixture cut sheets demonstrating that the proposed lighting will not illuminate or glare on adjoining properties or roadway. 5. The plan needs to provide a truck loading area on site as per town code Section 260-79. An area may be designated for this and drawn onto your existing plan for consideration. 6. Provide information for review as requested by the Planning Board at the work session that compares the existing traffic patterns of the site to that of the proposed use. Upon submittal of the above requested information, the Planning Board Will review the revised application. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very tr ly yours, Kristy Winse Senior Planner cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Imo.. ~ _ nb N Y S. ROUTE 25 }~1A{~~1M U w ON-SIR 62TA Im.n.~wN.NNNr 1 ; 1 i r.c.v. .x,.... JJJ 1x. U.... ..~..N n 1 ~ i f, ~ w<.~NNIh qn E ; / .NA n 11 j f u,IN i jl p 1! FMOMM1 : r` 't. 2 k ~n{h¢1R Of ox-ffll OtuM110 ,Jy~~. j~ ~ V/ 4 ~wx I ~w.r t tY~1NK.~iOR. ~ 1 2 ~ N N 1 1 L`. q ~ Jewroe• w /so~~oo~ ~ i i 1 D COtA.' WM~ T F~~i - - F L / 2 T :1i,. .....r. ....r,ye.~ I. r. v. ~ I v p_ g40._ j 1 r I . AYE 2l 1rr,...d rP4. _r y4'" -grsa-eaiK•• N a er. ~rr.N er..rc~ _ ~ sro sr T n Per+ LEGEND n 3 -ESTIMATE. OF CIN SITE AINAGE CRITERIA.5 ' p ~ ~ O~r XO T {I~Ip •Ql f :;"w AMR In a I•' nwv,~n... asi,rn pp,> nasa NroRW10 {Y 1 g oo - - SFAAGE CRITERIA { ;f .n Petition to Stop 7-11 from coming to Mattituck We fed a 7-11 (24 hour / 7 Day a week) On on Main Road & Factory Avenue would be dWNnenml bD the aommunty as It would kxrease tra<RC on both Main Road 0 Factory Avenue and would not bendlt our commmdty In any way. ANY We, the undersigned, are concerned dl~tlrs who urge our leaders to act now to Vol! cTdA AvE. 8exl 03 der Gl d 1140raw !A-Q ,K. v!~ E ~~G / l ( / Gv~GC SEA Aw ~ I Maze- DST' i r Av o A-."c.4 o A l C < < ll ~oCALe %/~S v~ r Ur rh* fr. i r. IoM Tait CIA FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 29: 2008 AMENDED: August 12, 2008 AMEDNED: September 4. 2008 AMENDED & RENEWED: February 12, 2009 TO: Patricia C. Moore (GAMA Properties) 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated July 8, 2008 For permit to make additions and alterations, converting an existing gas station and convenience store to a convenience store at Location of property: 9945 Route 25. Mattituck. NY County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 142 Block 1 Lot 27' Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The ro sed use r uires site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. This No ' royal was amend and renewed to remove all references to the Zonin Bo of A eal as variances are not 16nger re uired for this roiect. Aut rized i ature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A., PLANNING Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Project: Seven ElevenSite Plan Preparer. Kristy Wmser, Senior Planner Date: March 16, 2009 I. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: Seven Eleven SCI'MN#: 1000-142-1-27 Street Location: 9945 NYS Route 25, Mattituck Hamlet: Mattituck Type of Site Plan: New Property Owner. Crania Deer Park, Inc Applicant: same Agent: Pat Moore Site Plan Prepared By. Kempey Engineering Date of Map: 10/10/08, last revised 3/6/09 II.Time line: Date of pre-submission conference: 9/23/08 Date of Submission to Planning Board: 9/9/08- incomplete. Also required pre-submission. Date of application accepted: 11/3/08 - referred out. Date of work sessions: 11/3/08,3116/09 Date of project scoping: 11/05/08 Date of letters from Planning Board: 9/19/08 - Incomplete, 10/21/08- Comments sent to ZBA, 10/24/08-incomplete, 11/5/08-application accepted & referred out, 1/2/09 -Comments sent to ZBA regarding SEQR (Type II no further review), 2/10/08-no further review until revised plans that meet the code are submitted for review. Status: The original application with a proposed addition to the east of the existing building was denied by the ZBA on 1/22/09. A letter was sent to the applicant on 2/10/08 informing the applicant that there will be no further review until a revised site plan application is submitted based on the ZBA determination. Revised plans submitted 3/6/08 scheduled for work session on 3/16/08 to update the Board. III. Desg d tion of Site Plan Project Construction Type: Proposed 658 sq ft addition to existing building for retail use. Zoning Determination: The Notice of Disapproval indicates the need for site plan approval For additions and alterations, converting an existing gas station and convenience store to a convenience store. The proposed meets zoning. Call of meeting: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 s.f. gas station/convenience store and add a 658 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,670 s.f. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24, 829 s.f. parcel in the Business zone located on the n/e comer of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck SCIM# 1000-142-1-27 Building size area: 2,670sq. ft Panting required. 14C 1/per200sf Parking proposed: 23 IV. Site Analysis SEQRA CLASSIFICATION - TYPE II - no further Action This is an existing site (Gras station / Convenience store) on a 24, 829 s.f. parcel located on the comer of Factory Avenue and Main Road in Mattituck. The Waldbuams shopping center borders the subject parcel on the north and eastern property lines. Currentlythereis access to the site having two curb cuts from the Main road and a thud on Factory Avenue. The applicant is proposing to remove the gas station pumps and propose a retail use having 1,950 s.f. for a Seven Eleven convenience store. The applicant originally had proposed a 750 s.f. addition to the east of the building that required variances from the Board of Appeals, all of which were denied at their January 22, 2009 Public hearing. The applicant has since submitted an amended site plan on March 6, 2009 for review. The current proposal is for a 658 s.f. addition to the front of the existing building that conforms to zoning. It appears the applicant has sufficient drainage capacity on site and will be utilizing existing drainage pools to maintain run-off on site. However, drainage will be referred to the Town Engineer for further review. Also, 36 % of the site is proposed as landscaped area. This includes an 8 foot landscaped strip between the Main road and parking area having red oaks mixed with hemlocks, daisy, azaleas, a 4 foot landscape strip along the east property line, a landscaped comer treatment and existing natural vegetation to the rear of the site. The Architectural Review committee had previously reviewed this application however, the Committee should comment on the amended plan for the Board's consideration. In addition the proposed ground sign is proposed as being 15 foot high which is a concern. Consideration for a smaller monument style ground sign would be better fit at this highly visible comer. Last, the proposed convenience store requires 14 parking stalls based on 1 space per 200 sf. for a retail use and as proposed indicates 23 parking stalls on site that will need to be further reviewed for adequacy. There is one ingress / egress onto the Main Road having right turns only and another access point onto Factory Avenue. Site circulation will need to be carefully reviewed for efficiency and safety. A cross access agreement is recommended to have in place by the applicant for future use, which they have agreed to and is shown on the plan. Most recently on 2/11/09 there was a meeting with Board members, Town engineer, staff and the applicant at the DOT to discuss the corner radius dedication at the n/e comer of the Main Road and Factory In intersection. This has been a recommendation and identified as necessary development in an effort to improve this comer. In summary. 1. At this point the DOT has requested that the applicant provided a T.I.S. report for the DOT to review. The report was requested due a letter from the applicant representative stating that the proposed use will not impact the corner greater than what is currently on site. As discussed, if the applicant improves the comer dedication, there is no need for the applicant to provide a T.I.S. 2. The applicant will submit to the Town and the DOT two estimates for the cost of improvements. One will for the standard cost without considering the radius dedication (i.e. curb, sidewalks, tie in ect.) the other will include the radius dedication that would require relocation of the utility pole. 3. The applicant will submit a truck template for the DOT to review. The State R.O.W. maybe sufficient enough for the turning radius improvements. V: Permits and/or Review Required From Other Agencies -referred out on 11/5/08 *Agencies have only commented on the original application that has been denied by the Zoning Board. • NYS DOT - waiting for submissions from the applicant based on 2/11/09 meeting. • Mattituck Fire District- Recommend that all access points allow for fire access. • Transportation Commission- It was recommend that comer radius is subject to NYSDOT approval, no parking along Main road or Factory Ln, and careful consideration to this scenic corridor with regard to landscaping and aesthetics. • Planning Commission - Local determination • Building Inspector Certification- waiting • Drainage review from Town Engineer - waiting • LWRP review for consistency waiting • ARC - Satisfied with proposed elevations but, requested minor revisions. VI: Staff Recommendations - The Planning Department recommends the Planning Board considers the following: 1. Provide an update of the status of the application and provide a summary for the Board members of the meeting held at the NYSDOT regarding the comer radius dedication. 2. Consider referring the amended application out for comments. 3. Request the following information from the applicant: -Revised site plan application -Floor Plan -Truck template -Full lighting plan VII: Materials to aid in review • Aerial view of property WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, March 16, 2009 4:00 p.m. .4:00 p.m. Site Plans.& Subdivision Applications Site Plans: Project name: Peconic Landin /Brecknock Hall SCTM#: 1000-35-1-25 Location: n/s/o NYS Route 25, 1,121' e/o Sound Road, in Green port Description: This amended site plan is for the proposed renovation of an existing two- story building where. 1,565 sq. ft. is public space, 1,400 sq. ft. is office space, plus misc. space and one (1) two-bedroom apartment on the second floor on a 136.6 acre parcel known as Peconic Landing in the R- 80 Zone. Status: Request for Final Inspection - Action: Staff inspected the site and has found that the work done to date is in accordance with the approved site plan. Consider approving the final site inspection letter. Attachments: Draft Letter Project name: Seven Eleven Mattituck SCTM#: 1000-142-1-27 Location: Located on the We comer of Facto Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store and add a 685 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,635 sq. ft. for a retail use (convenience stone) on a 24, 829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone. Status: The Zoning Board of Appeals denied variances requested by the applicant and the applicant has now submitted revised plans that do.not require variance relief for review. Action`. Consider referring out the revised plans for comments. Attachments: None Subdivisions: Project name: Conklin Point Estates SCTM#: 1000-53-4-44.1 & 44.3 Location: Located on the west side of Kerwin Boulevard, approximately 575 feet west of August Lane in Greenport. Description: This proposal is to subdivide a 7.725-acre parcel into four lots, where Lot' 1 equals 29,869. sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 29,869 sq. ft.; Lot 3 equals 29,869 sq. ft., Lot4 equals 29,869 sq. ft. and the open space parcel equals 4.1 acres, excluding the area of wetlands. This project includes the transferring of 37,882 sq. ft. of buildable lands from SCTM#1000-53-4- 44.3 onto the subject property for the u oses of establishing yield. Status: Conditional Sketch Approval Action: Consider setting Preliminary Public-Hearin Attachments: PATRICIA C. MOORE ~J Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 1 1952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries March 5, 2009 ~ Mr. Martin Sider, Chairman and Southold Town Planning Board - 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 att: KristyWinser Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattitu SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Kristy: : - Enclosed are 7 copies of the following plans dated March 2, 2009: 1. Key map ;site plan; parking, drainage & sanitary calculations with Zoning data 2. Landscaping plan, schedule & notes and lighting notes 3. Site details 4. North and south elevations A-1 5. East and west elevations A-2 The building inspector issued an updated notice of disapproval which indicates that only site plan review is required. This plan requires no variances. jorgfruly yPrs, LP 7cia C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. Vivian Kamath MEETING ATTENDANCE CASE NO. 01-099P, PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE ROUTE 25, MATTITUCK DATE: WEDNESDAY, February 11, 2009 NAME ORGANIZATION TELEPHONE NO I ~ 6 1 76 S- 9 'JAr`nE5 A. e N?~R-_ ~oc,.nJ DF oo~oLD ~3~ `l ~ J`~GO $~"')T'~ ~ ~,?1'~IZ~cr..' 63 (-.$o¢- 9770 PLEASE PRINT NAME CLEARLY k -5,)b1"11 P--)4imck)c5 of ('joo -d ImPfOvr1nan1s <,**-45 orn~ AISO PS~)'YkpdC 4i- - we,/(d ~7 CTirnC/ /<dl,)s ;nc%d.= ~l•L J7, it ~1I'f -o(` ~e L/~oT ~e rellic~ AUX,-s %2oL)-"JrJ JJM~/oJ</na l/S i /A[~ ~0 !5~ d~ i f A T/ 5. U66 1LbT t'5 !c i1'17 SJ , T{i~ 7yff o k v TA$' i S fie, ~~caJ ~hti f i~ fJibU/n«n J/S ~Ae l rrli 4. /";a /lr rp~~d 7S r C~o~ o/~ q~~~/v~>/S 57/~vr7/S. !'6T t7rn a~ee/-:~~~ov`'mrn f~/oirt~~ I<J /Jrr~?l~~y- ;(4d *ii// 4//so 506mij w 4o' clc nlQr/4TC Jo ilw- DoT 7C b- ~Ps~la /y o Jgay o/C -fir` 4vrnin5 /cdi-oS imPro-n,cn~5 1010 dpi ca Jon ~ 0 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS sou? P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chaff ~ y OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS 4 41 Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 10, 2008 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Gama Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM# 142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore; As you are aware, the Zoning Board Of Appeals has denied the requested variances in connection to the above referenced site plan application. Therefore, your site plan cannot be processed fiuther until a revised application is submitted for review. It is recommended that you meet with the Building Department for a new Notice of Disapproval for the revised plans then resubmit directly to the Planning Department. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Thank you. Very truly yours, Kristy Winser Senior Planner cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer APPEALS BOARD MEMBE ~DF $0(/ly ~ Mailing Address: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman O~ Southold Town Hall O 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 Ruth D. Oliva Southold, NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio, Jr. • O Office Location: Michael A. Simon O Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman ~yCOUNf'I54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. - Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION- MEETING OF JANUARY 22, 2009 ZB File No. 6219 - GAMA DEER PARK, INC. (Applicant) Property Location: 9945 Route 25 and Factory Avenue, Mattituck Suffolk County Tax Map Parcel 1000-142-1-27 Town of Southold Zoning District: B-General Business SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated September 22, 2008 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. BASIS OF THE APPLICATION: Request for Variances under Sections 28049 and 280-50C, based on an application to the Building Inspector for a building permit and the Building Inspector's amended September 4, 2008 Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed additions and alterations in converting an existing gas station and convenience store uses to a convenience store (retail store). The reasons stated for disapproving the building permit application are that the new construction: (1) will have a single side yard at less than the code required minimum of 25 feet; (2) will have a rear yard at less than 35 feet; (3) will be greater than the code limitation of 60 linear feet of frontage on one street. PROPERTY FACTS: The property contains 24,140 square feet with a 1,950 square foot retail building with a nonconforming frontage of 65 linear feet along the north side of New York State Route 25 (a/k/a Main Road), and the east side of Factory Avenue in Mattituck. Page 2 - January 22, 2009 • • ZBA # 6219 - Gama Deer Park, Inc. CTM 142-1-27 FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on December 4, 2008, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting area variances from Zoning Code Chapter 280, Article XI Sections 280-49 and 280-50c, for reductions in the side yard setback and the rear yard setback for a proposed 25 ft. by 30 ft. extension (a 750 square foot addition) and alterations to the existing nonconforming building which contains the office and sales area for a gasoline station and convenience store, and business garage bays. The new 750 sq. ft. addition to the existing building: (1) will have a single side yard at less than the code required minimum of 25 feet; (2) will have a rear yard at less than 35 feet. In addition, relief is requested under Section 280-50C to enlarge the existing building by an additional 25 feet, resulting in a total length of 90 linear feet of frontage on one street (N-YS Route 25, a/k/a Main Road), instead of the Code limitation of 60 linear feet. The existing (1,950 square foot) building is located at 21'8" from the north/east property line, 49'2" from the east property line, 88'5" to the south (front yard) lot line, and +/-39 feet to the west (front yard) property line. The new addition to the building: (1) will reduce the code-required minimum of 25 feet to 24.16 feet on a single yard to the north, (2) will reduce the code-required minimum of 35 feet to 21.67 feet on the rear yard, (3) will increase the linear footage from the existing nonconforming length of 65 feet to 90 linear feet adjacent to the Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25). REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 667-b(3)(b)(3)(1). Grant of the variances will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. On the northern and eastern sections of the applicant's site are retaining walls raised above the adjacent parcel containing a large parking area for the adjacent shopping center. Since the applicant's property contains these barriers, its patrons and employees are not able to access onto the adjacent shopping center's parking area and the property sits above the adjacent property like a plateau. The applicant's site is situated at a four-way traffic light and along two public streets with busy traffic and crosswalks for pedestrians. This site has a limited area for open space access. There are several businesses in close vicinity to this parcel with uncontrolled parking or that lack site plan approval. 2 Page 3 - January 22, 2009 • • ZBA # 6219 - Gama Deer Park, Inc. CTM 142-1-27 To the west of this site is Factory Avenue, a busy public road which is also accessed with poor turning and poor visibility at the four-way intersection, with difficult turning onto Factory Avenue. To the west of Factory Avenue are established businesses (ice cream store) and auto repair garage, boat salestrepair use, located in the B Business Zone District. In summary, the existing site is constrained substantially by its surrounding environment. The busy corner at NYS Route 25 and Factory Avenue can only marginally accommodate the new use with the current building as exists at this site. A conversion of the building with alterations for a new fulltime retail convenience store in an enlarged, longer building would exacerbate the difficulties that currently exist at the four-way street intersection with high traffic. No evidence was presented to the Board to indicate that the proposed fulltime use as a convenience store could not function within the present building, which contains space for two restroom facilities, one office and convenience sales area, a storage room at the rear of the building, and three garage bays for auto repair. The existing building is slightly under 2,000 square feet of floor area. The new proposed addition will expand this already nonconforming building and will create new setback and building frontage nonconformities. Additionally, there is a difficulty created for fire and rescue department to access the building as proposed with encroachments into the easterly side yard. The current nonconforming building is large enough to be occupied by three business uses, without inhibiting the easterly side yard for emergency access. The increased size for a single use ;creates a new obstruction rather than keeping the yard areas open space, for emergency vehicles, for safe parking, or even for outdoor enjoyment for patrons or employees. Testimony was'submitted to the Board at length indicating the impact that the use will have on the community. The increased size of the nonconforming building would create a detriment to its own on-site activities because the parcel lacks the size required under the current codes for a 30,000 square foot minimum parcel, and is nonconforming. The Board finds that the grant of all the requested variances will impact the immediate area and cause a detriment to nearby properties. 2. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance (three,area variances). The applicant has made no attempt to enlarge the existing building in the conforming yard areas or by making it deeper, which would eliminate one of the requested variances for building frontage (length) along the Main State Road. Instead the applicant is requesting a new nonconformity at the easterly side yard which is currently open space without obstructions. 3 A Page 4 - January 22, 2009 • • ZBA # 6219 - Gama Deer Park, Inc. CTM 142-1-27 The existing building contains at least 1950 square feet for its current three uses, and can accommodate the new single converted use, as planned with removal of the existing three uses at the property (gasoline sales area, three garage bays, an office, sales area, storage room, bathroom facilities). In addition, the changes at the site to remove the gasoline pump islands, do not make the existing building more conforming to the code, but instead the addition as proposed with alterations to convert the three uses to a single use will create more nonconformity on the northern and eastern side yards. 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances requested herein are substantial, resulting in a 28% increase in building length and significant increases of nonconformity with regard to the setbacks that are already nonconforming on the side and rear of the existing building. The existing building length is already five feet longer, or 8.33% of the code maximum limitation of 60 linear feet, and the proposed addition increases that by an additional 33%, amounting to a six-fold increase in the degree of nonconformance for the additional 30 feet. 4. Town Law `5267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self created because it is applicant's desire to request additions to the already nonconforming building. 5. Town Law, §267-b(3)(b)(4). Testimony was presented to suggest that the variances in this community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the relief requested is NOT the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of his property, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Oliva, seconded by Member Simon, and duly carried, to DENY all variances, as applied. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Goehringer (Chairman), Oliva, Dinizio, Simon and Weisman. This Resolution was duly adolIpcct\\ed (5-0). a~ W - S: a /y/2009 RUTH D. OLIVA, VICE CHAIRWOMAN Approved for Filing 4 1/20; *updated 1/21 AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING THURSDAY, JANUARY 22, 2009 6:00 P.M. Place of Meeting: Southold Town Hall Annex, NFB Building, 54375 Main Road at Youngs Avenue, Southold. Call to Order by Chairman Gerard P. Goehringer. 1. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT updates: A. Received Type II by Planning Board: GAMA PROPERTIES (7-11) # 6219 - Variance for convenience store conversion at Main Road and Factory Avenue, Mattituck. B. Pending via Lead Agency: ROMANELLI REALTY INC. # 6224 - Special Exception for commercial use as contractor yard. II. DELIBERATIONS/POSSIBLE DECISION/OTHER RESOLUTIONS: (No testimony, for Board Member deliberations, etc.): PHs 12/4/08: GAMA (7-11 Store) # 6219 - Request for Variances under Sections 280-49 and 280- 50C, based on the Building Inspector's amended September 4, 2008 Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed additions and alterations in converting an existing gas station and convenience store uses to a convenience store (retail store). The reasons stated for disapproving the building permit application are that the new construction: (1) will have a single side yard at less than the code required minimum of 25 feet; (2) will have a rear yard at less than 35 feet; (3) will be greater than 60 linear feet of frontage on one street. Location of Property: 9945 Main Road (NYS Route 25) and Factory Avenue, Mattituck; CTM 1000-142-1-27. Zone District: B-General Business. *STEVE and OLGA TENEDIOS #6198. Request for Variances under Sections 280-124, based on the Building Inspector's June 30, 2008 amended Notice of Disapproval concerning a proposed new dwelling, after removal of the existing building(s) for placement on a new location with pilings or other • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE o~~OF SOUr~O Southold, NY 11971 Chair h OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ~~yCO,nM Southold, NY Yul~1 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Gerard P. Goehringer, ZBA Chairman Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair Members of the Planning Board Date: January 2, 2009 Re: Seven Eleven Store SCTM#1000-142-1-27 ZBA# 6219 The Planning Board has reviewed the information prepared by the project sponsor for above property and has made a determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Section 617.5 Type II Actions list actions that are not subject to review since they have been determined not to have a significant impact on the environment. The proposed project would fall under section ( C ) 7 of this part "Construction or expansion of a primary or accessory/appurtenant, non-residential structure or facility involving less than 4,000 square feet of gross floor area and not involving a change in zoning or a use variance and consistent with local land use controls, but not radio communication or microwave transmission facilities". Therefore based on above, no further review is required under SEQR at this time. We hope that the information provided to you is helpful. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact the Planning Department. Thank you. F u +XCeu ov STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION TEN 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 1 1788 www.nysdot.gov SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, PE. ASTRID C. GLYNN REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER December 31, 2008 Ms. Patricia C. Moore, Esq. Attorney at Law 51020. Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Your December 23, 2008 Letter Proposed Convenience Store 9945 Main Road NY 25, Mattituck SCTM 1000-14200-0100-027000 Our Case No. 01-099P Dear Ms, Moore: This is in regard to your response to item 41 in our December 1, 2008 letter to Mr. Eugene G. Kempey. Your letter purports that the new development will lessen the impact to the New York State road, yet engineering studies or details supporting that statement were not provided to us. In order f r us to consider the validity of that statement a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) should be provided for our review. It should show the existing traffic generation at the current site and it should show the existing traffic generation at an existing convenience store of the same size and type as what is being proposed. The TIS should be prepared in accordance with the attached guidelines. In addition, it is conceivable that trucks accessing the site for delivery purposes may be accessing the site from Factory Avenue and exiting onto NY 25. These trucks may need to use Factory Avenue to return to Truck 25 (CR 48). The consulting engineer should provide us with a truck circulation and tracking pattern on site to show how the largest dimension trucks will be accessing and leaving the site as well as the proposed routing to and from the site. Truck tracking should also be shown for those trucks making the westbound NY 25 maneuver to northbound Factory Ave. Improvements to that radius may be necessary to accommodate that movement as part of the mitigation for the site development. Ms. Patricia C. Moore ! • December 31, 2008 Page 2 of 2 Once we have been provided this information we can consider the statements and requests that have been made in your letter and proceed with our review accordingly. Please submit three (3) copies of a TIS for our review. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject Case Number and County Tax Map number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very trul~yxours, Original , SD~y ;rik A. Sad SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: W. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold s. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold Ms. Heather Lanza, Planning Director, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:ajf PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 December 23, 2008 Mark Wolfgang, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering & Safety State Of New York Department of Transportation. Region 10 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge,NY 11788 E, Re: Case Number 01-009P SCTM#1000-142-01-27 l Proposed Convenience Store 9945 Main Road (Route 25) Southold NY 11971 y Dear Mr. Wolfgang; x I have been forwarded Mr. Saad's letter'dated-q .7tcember 1, 2008 for a response to item #1. Drawings wiil.;,be`forwarded by Mr. Kempey, the Professional Engineer, to address items 42 through #18. Prior to submission of the site plan to you, I met with the Southold Planning Board to discuss the proposed plan for a convenience store. The property is currently improved with a gas station, convenience store, a two bay service garage and self service gas dispensers on two islands with a canopy. The proposed project, which eliminates the multiple uses and proposes a single use occupancy, significantly reduces the number of legal uses and lessens the impact on a New York State road. Since the intensity of the uses are lessened by the proposed project, the Planning Board specifically recommended that the site owner provide an "easement for future dedication" to the State of New York. However, contrary to Mr. Saad's letter of December 1, 2008 there was no legal obligation to make the costly improvements to the Factory Avenue/NY 25 intersection which your office has demanded. The proposed curb cuts along State Route 25 improve an existing condition and the improvements to the property do not require the grant of an easement or dedication. Such a dedication or easement would generally require the State to compensate the owner. Nevertheless, the owner is willing to grant an easement to the State at no cost. The easement would allow for future improvements to the intersection. It is unconstitutional to condition our approval to constructing improvements to an intersection which are unrelated to our development. There has been extensive testimony taken throughout previous public hearings for previously proposed projects for this property as well as studies completed for the development of the CVS store which address the historic problems with the corner of Factory Avenue and New York State Route 25. The traffic circulation on Route 25 and Factory Avenue are unrelated to the subject property. My client is willing to cooperate and grant a property right for the benefit of the Town and/or State but the client will not fund the cost of relocation of utilities and road realignments. We look forward with working with you rather than litigating the issue. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. V tru y yours, ricia C. Moore cc: Gama Deer Park, Inc Vivian Kamath, DSC Construction Corp Kempy Engineering Southold Planning Board W 41 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~Rg a STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING THOMAS A. ISLES, A.I.C.P DIRECTOR OF PLANNING December 9, 2008 Town of Southold Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11935 Att: Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Dear Ms. Winser: Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan Special Exception which has been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan S.C.T.M. No. Seven Eleven Store 1000-142-01-27 (7-Eleven, Inc.) NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, Thomas A. Isles, AICP Dir r o Pla / n re P. re ns Chief Iklanner APF:ds LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR P. O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5191 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE SOGr~O~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair y OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS T Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR N Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND co m NY 1111 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator From: Kristy Winser Senior Planner Date: December 4, 2008 Re: Site plan application for Seven Eleven SCTM#1000-142-1-27 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. The file is available at your convenience. Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store and add a 750 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,700 sq. ft. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24, 829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the We comer of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Thank you for your cooperation. r" L cne~at STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION TEN 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 1 1788 www.nysdot.gov SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. -^"ASTRID C. GLYNN REGIONAL DIRECTOR y1';;( COMMISSIONER December 1, 2008 t 1 ' DEC - 4 ..08 Mr. Eugene G. Kempey, P.E., President Kempey Engineering 4 Brunswick Drive - - East Northport, NY 11731 , Your October 13, 2008 Submission Proposed Convenience Store 9945 Main Road NY 25, Serthoid Ma;t~-b,ICPI SCTM 1000-14200-0100-027000 Our Case No. 01-099P Dear Mr. Kempey: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site work and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. The Town of Southold has recommended that the site owner dedicate property on the east side of the Factory Avenue / NY 25 intersection to the Town and improve the radius as part of the site improvements. We concur with the proposed disposition of the property dedication at this location and we support the Town's recommendation to improve the intersection radius as part of the site improvements. Please provide us with revised plans. 2. On Sheets SP-3 & 4 please show only the applicable details and remove all others. 3. At the site access on NY 25, the proposed median island must be offset from the curb line a minimum of four (4) feet. The median island should be extended with pavement markings to the NY 25 white edge line and provisions should be made for the pedestrians crossing at this location. 4. A Keep Right symbol sign should be installed in the interior bull nose of the proposed driveway median. Mr. Eugene G. Kempey • • December 1, 2008 Page 2 of 3 5. The pavement markings are not shown correctly on Factory Ave and the lane lines on NY 25 do not appear to be correct. 6. The stop line in the site driveway on NY 25 is too far from the roadway. 7. A stop sign and an "All Traffic" sign with a three o'clock arrow should be installed at the NY 25 egress. 8. No left turn signs should be installed for eastbound NY 25 traffic. We recommend that you consult the National MUTCD with NYS supplement to provide the appropriate signs, in the appropriate locations and oriented correctly. 9. This permit was last reviewed as a proposed carwash/gas station. The site is being re- proposed as a 7-11 convenience store without a gas station. Compared to the previous plan submittal, the current plan is showing that the edge of curb along Factory Avenue has been relocated 18' west of the property line. Existing (field) conditions place the edge of curb at approximately 6' west of the property line. Please explain how will this impact the intersection with the State ROW. 10. Applicant was advised on 7/7/06 that site runoff would enter the State ROW. Applicant responded on 11/19/07 that spot elevations will not allow this to happen. We disagree with that assertion. Currently, the site appears to be graded so as to pitch most stormwater onto the adjacent roads. The current plan does not indicate that re-grading will take place as part of redevelopment of the site. Existing grates and drainage inlets and their elevations are called out as sufficient to prevent runoff onto the State ROW. 11. Some of the plan information is INCORRECT as several indicated inlets are either non- existent or incorrectly located. The existing grate located on the south property line is shown as being in the proposed driveway entrance. It is actually located several feet to the east, where it will be behind a 6" curb after construction. Two TOG'S (Top of Grates) are indicated as existing to the northwest of this grate. Presently, there are NO drainage grates existing at this location. The area is completely asphalted. Spot elevations of t.c. and b.c. in relation to non-existent or incorrectly located drainage structures are meaningless in determining whether or not runoff will be contained on site. 12. The inlets which actually do exist on site are likely inadequate to collect the full volume of potential runoff, present or future. At the point where the driveway crosses from the State ROW to private property there are neither high points to fully break the flow of runoff nor a correct inlet and elevations to collect the runoff before it reaches the ROW. We suggest modifying drainage to prevent runoff onto State ROW and revising plan to show correct site conditions. 13. We are requesting an erosion control plan to address site disturbance that has the potential to create runoff and erosion which could potentially find its way into the State ROW. Simply removing accumulated sediment from drainage structures at the end of construction is not acceptable solution. We Suggest installation of silt fence at ROW boundaries and use of Temporary Sediment Filter Bag for Drainage Structures-Item 1029.11M is suggested. Provide applicable details. Mr. Eugene G. Kempey • December 1, 2008 Page 3 of 3 14. On the Landscaping Plan, forty eight Hemlocks are proposed. Hemlock is highly susceptible to insect problems and typically requires regular pesticide applications to control. There are more sustainable and environmentally appropriate evergreen tree choices available. We also suggest planting the native Eastern Red Cedar. We suggest adding a mix of perennials to the proposed Montauk Daisies. 15. All work and material details shall be shown in the plans and referenced to current NYSDOT specification item numbers. 16. Pedestrian countdown timers should be installed. 17. The plan must include the note "Repair existing shoulder, sidewalk and curbing as ordered by State Engineer." 18. Please show and call out the nearest NY 25A mile marker on the plan. Please submit six (6) copies of revised plans for our review. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject Case Number and County Tax Map number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By Shaik A. Saad SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Peter Hams, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold s. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:ajf 2008-11-25 14:04 N R BRAS* 6317346235» • P 1/1 1 ~ T~"/-.~ 1~W SOUTHOLD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ,F^ Town we P. 0.9w 1179 53095 Main Road SadhnW, ar 11971-0959 ftne (631) 7651935 FM(931)765-3135 TO: Gerard P. Ooetringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeal Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Planning Board Office FROM: Neboysha R Brashieh, Chairman &Y4~7 DATE: November 25, 2008 RE: (lama Properties (7-11 Store), Mattituck ZBA Variance #6219 SCTM 1000-142-1-27 This memorandum is in reference to two requests: ZBA memo dated November 21 and PB memo dated November 6. Thin site was reviewed three times in 2006/2007 under a different proposal - Warex Project - SCTM 1000-142-1-27. Subject current single use proposal was reviewed by the Commission at its November 24 meeting per your requests. The Commission approves this revised proposal with three provisos: • That the comer radius ( State We 25 and Factory Avenue) be redesigned to the requirements and standards of the previous submission subject to NYSDOT oval; • That no parking be permitted on State Rte 25 and Factory Avenue fiontmg this property; and, • That landscaping costs be bome by the applicant as previously agreed. As you are aware, State Route 25 is a designated NYS scenic byway. We request, in addition, that the proposed scenic quality of the site be maintained via appropriate plantings and that the proposed building is as architecturally pleasing as possible. kATTITUCK FIRE DISTRIP PO BOX 666, PIKE STREET 'L MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952-0666 Commissioners Jerome E. Zuhoski., Chairman John C. Harrison, Secretary Martin L Grl fin, Sr., Vice Chairman Barbera Dickerson, Treasurer Norman A. Reilly, Jr. David F. Haas Lloyd H. Relsenberg November 11, 2008 Southold Town Planning Board Attn: Kristy Wisner, Senior Planner P O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Seven Eleven Dear Ms. Wisner, - The Board of Fire Commissioners after reviewing your request for fire access at the above referenced site plan at their regular meeting on November 11, 2008; make the following recommendation. That all drives and roads on the proposed site plan are to cleared and maintained to meet Southold Town Right-of-Way code clearance requirements and all accesses have the proper width to allow the entrance of fire and rescue apparatus. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, = o n C. Harrison Secretary/Fire District Manager cc: Board of Fire Commissioners Chief 4 Office (631) 298-8837 Facsimile (631) 298-8841 • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE OF SOSouthold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND COUSouthold, NY 11' , Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Transportation Commission Members From: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: November 6, 2008 Subject: New Site Plan for the Proposed Seven Eleven, Mattituck Located at the Comer of Main Road and Factory Avenue The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and a determination of jurisdiction. Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store and add a 750 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,700 sq. ft. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Thank you for your cooperation. Please feel free to call me with any questions or comments regarding the above. 0 4 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS pF P.O. Box 1179 SO(/jyo JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND COU' Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 5, 2008 New York State Department of Transportation 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Attention: Mr. Mark Wolfgang Re: Comments on the Site Plan for Seven Eleven, Mattituck Located: n/e Comer of Factory Avenue & Main Road SCTM 1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: Business Dear Mr. Wolfgang: The following site plan is being referred to you for comments. This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store and add a 750 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,700 sq. ft. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours I{risty Winse Senior Planner Encl: 1 Site Plan Site Plan Application Environmental Assessment Form • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS .1 Of P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE SOUly~~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND I,YCO~n~' Southold, NY u11 Telephone: 631 765-1838 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Memorandum To: Sanford Hanauer, Chairman Southold Town Architectural Review Committee From: Kristy Winser Date: November 5, 2008 RE: Request for Review and Comments on Site Plan known as Seven Eleven, Mattituck The Planning Board refers this site plan application to your agency for your review and comments. This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store and add a 750 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,700 sq. ft. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Thank you. Encl: Site Plan Application and Site Plan Elevations • 0 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS pF SOUI P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair h OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR • Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND OIyC,UUlI l , Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 5, 2008 Suffolk County Planning Commission Mr. Andrew P. Freleng, AICP, Chief Planner H. Lee Dennison Building, 4th Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788-0099 Re: Planning Commission Comments on the Site Plan for Seven Eleven Store Located on n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck SCTM 4:1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: Business Dear Mr. Freleng: Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan is being referred to you for comments. Attached are the site plan, EAF and site plan application. This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store and add a 750 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,700 sq. ft. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, too* Kristy Wins Senior Planner Enc. 1 Site Plan Site Plan Application Environmental Assessment Form • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE SOUTy~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR • O 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND COU' Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Memorandum To: James Richter From: Kristy Winser Date: November 5, 2008 Re: Request for Review on Site Plan for Seven Eleven, Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Type of Application Sketch Site Plan (Dated: 1 Preliminary Site Plan (Dated: 1 x_ Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated: x 1 Other (AS BUILT) (Dated: ) Project Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store and add a 750 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,700 sq. ft. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS q f so P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR H 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765.1835 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 5, 2008 Mr. John Harrison c/o Mattituck Fire District P.O. Box 666 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Request for Review on Site Plan for Seven Eleven, Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Harrison: The enclosed site plan application, referenced above, is being referred to you for fire access review. Please respond with your recommendations at your earliest convenience. This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sa ft gas station/convenience store and add a 750 sa ft addition- having a total of 2.700 sa ft for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24,829 sa ft parcel in the Business Zone located on the We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Kristy Wins Senior Planner enc. site plan application site plan • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE QF SOUr~O Southold, NY 11971 Chair l OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR N 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ~''COUSouthold, NY 111, Telephone: 631 766-1838 Fax: 631 766-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Scott A. Russell, Supervisor Members of the Town Board Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk cc: Town Attorney From: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: November 5, 2008 Re: Site Plan for Seven Eleven, Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and a determination of jurisdiction, if applicable. Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store and add a 750 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,700 sq. ft. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone located on the n/e corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Thank you for your cooperation. • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE OF SOSouthold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR • 4kc 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 5, 2008 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Gama Deer Park ( 7-11 Mattituck SCTM# 142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore; The above-referenced site plan has been formally accepted by the Planning Board for review. Additional comments will be provided following full review by Staff, the Town Planning Board, Town Departments and involved/interested agencies. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, 1 Kristy Wins Senior Planner cc: Planning Board PROJECT SCOPING • PLANNING APPLICATIONS Wednesday 05, 2008 2:OOpm . Project name: Southwold Manor SCTM# 63-3-15 Location: located on the north side of main road approximately 829' east of Boisseau Avenue in Southold Description: This new residential site plan is for the proposed construction of a 24 unit active adult condominium community consisting of eight (8) residential multiple dwelling unit buildings, reconstruct the existing single family residence into a building containing three (3) affordable housing units, an' onsite chromoglass wastewater treatment system and various amenities including a 2,460 sq. ft. 2-story clubhouse, 800 sq. ft. swimming pool, 880 sq. ft. tennis court and 474 sq. ft. of deck on a 6.75 acre parcel. SCTM 1000-63-3-15. Status: Review submission Project name: Seven Eleven SCTM# ! 142-1-27 Location: 9945 NYS Route 25, Mattituck . _ Description: This site plan is for a 750 s.f. addition to an existing 1,950 s.f. building having a total 2,700 s.f for retail use (convenience store) on a 24, 829 s.f. parcel in the Business Zone. Status: New Site plan . • ~ J PATRICIA C. MOORE Ac Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 7654330 Fax: (631) 7654643 November 3, 2008 Southold Town Planning Board hand delivered RE: GAMA PROPERTIES-DEER PARK INC. lU-Y~ Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Enclosed please find my clients check in the amount of $1,350.00 representing the balance due on the SEQRA review of the previous application. Thank you. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore PCM/bp encls. C: Gama properties liI J i OV - 5 2008 • WORK SESSION AGENDA • SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, November 3, 2008 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Site Plans & Subdivisions/Lot Line Changes Site Plans Project Name: Seven Eleven SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 I Location: 9945 NYS Route 25, Mattituck Description. This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store and add a 750 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 'i 2,700 sq. ft. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24,829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone. Status: New Site Plan Action: Recommend the Planning Board accept the site plan and comments, startSEQRA review, and refer the application out to interested agencies. Attachments: Staff Report . Project Name: Owen Construction SCTM# ! 1000-102-2-12.5 Location . 29025 NYS Route 25, Cutchogue Description: This site plan is for the conversion of an existing dwelling to professional offices on a 20,224.28 sq. ft. parcel in the RO Zoning District. Status: Review Site Plan . Action: Recommend the Planning Board accept the comments and waive the public hearing. Attachments: ; Staff Report Project Name: The Heritage at Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-102-1-33.3 Location: Northwest corner of Griffing Street and School House Lane, approximately 1,079 feet north of Main Road, in Cutchogue. Description: Development of a Planned 55+ Active Adult Community consisting of 139, detached and attached dwellings, 14 of which will be permanently affordable on a vacant 46.17-acre parcel. Status: SEAR - reviewing DEIS for adequacy for public comment . Recommendations: Review the report from KPC and determine whether the Planning Board is ready to make a determination of adequacy for the DEIS. Project Name: Shizen (aka Gala, Oki-do) y SCTM#: 1000-38-7-7.1 Location: 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Description: This proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center. ;Status: SEQR - Reviewing DEIS for adequacy for public comment. Recommendations: Overview of application, and review of consultant's review of DEIS (if received in time A ~V PATRICIA C. MOORE Y Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries October 31, 2008 Ms. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman and Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 att: Kristy Winser Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Kristy: In accordance with your letter dated October 24, 2008 enclosed is my client's check #1020 in the amount of $572.00. As discussed at our pre-submission meeting enclosed are prints of a survey of the property prepared by Vollmuth & Brush dated 2/16/06. Also enclosed are 9 complete sets of the site plan with the lighting plan and fixture detail (SP-4), as well as the sign detail (SP-5)(A-1). Please replace the set of site plans in your file with the enclosed. Mr. Kamath and the engineer, Mr. Kempy, will be attending the Planning Board work session if you have any questions. They would ask to be heard early (4:00 pm) because they must travel a long distance home. Thank you for your continued courtesies. Ye;y ruly ours, l atricia C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. Vivian Kamath 4 `r' • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Or SOU P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Dy~~ JHpI Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON 'it1 7~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND IyCOU,M'~ Southold, NY 1111 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Faze: 631 765-3136 October 24, 2008 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia C Moore Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Gama Deer Park ( 7-11), Mattituck SCTM# 142-1-27 Dear Ms. Moore; I'm writing as a follow up to our pre-submission meeting on October 23, 2008 regarding the above site plan. As previously mentioned at the meeting your application is tentatively scheduled for November 3, 2008 for a work session. For the Planning Board to consider your application as complete the following items will need to be submitted prior to the work session: 1. Application fee for this site plan as per section 280-138 A. in the amount of 572.00 . 2. As indicated in a letter dated October 6, 2008 to Vivian Kamath still needs to be submitted in the amount of $2,735 payable to the Town of Southold for the SEQRA review pursuant to 6NYCCR Part 617 for the prior application. 3. Please submit lighting plan and detail of lighting fixtures. Lighting shall be oriented and shielded so as not to illuminate or glare on adjoining properties or roadways. 4. Proposed signage and building specifications will be necessary for review by the Architectural Review Committee. Once the Planning Board makes a determination to accept your application, additional comments will be provided following review by staff, the Town departments and involved / interested agencies. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Kristy iW n Senior Planner CC: Planning Board • i Page 1 of 1 Winser, Kristy From: Lanza, Heather Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 200811:15 AM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: SEAR cost Warex/7-11 application Kristy, Please print this for the file. We will accept 50% of the SEQR fee we asked the applicant for 7-11 Mattituck to pay on their previous application's SEQR review (Warex). It came to light that there may have been some miscommunications during that review process due to all the staff turnover that led to a misunderstanding on the part of the applicant of what the costs of the SEQR review would be. I conveyed this information to Vivian Kamath by telephone on October 28, in answer to his request that they be allowed to pay only 50% of the remaining balance. He said that they will be sending in the 50% ($1,350) in the next few days along with the fee for the site plan application. Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: heather.lanza@town.southold.ny.us 11/3/2008 • The Suite K Times • October 212008.10 • ~ (1 ENT DITCRIA S IAt what prim `Ci Kne4tftlh middy waters Mattituck To the Editor: In last week's Suffolk Tunes, there was We think Southold Town has a potentially far-reaching, se rious - afid C tl .merle al aaan article about approving a 7-Eleven g problem on its hands: It's requir-storeonMain Road andFactory Avenue. ing permits from a board that may very well have no author- hope the Planning Board takes a few ity to issue them. (See story on page 3.) things into consideration before granting State law specifies the procedure for towns to follow when this transferring statutory powers of elective officers, such as the First off Southold residents have been trying to preserve the small town and Town Board, to others, and it requires a mithdatory referen community feel of our town for years dum of the voters. The Town Board has transferred to the x and it's been an upward fight. The town Trustees its jurisdiction, conferred by various state laws to has been trying to buy and preserve regulate structures and activities in wetlands and state wa- farmland and properties for years with tern, without fng a referendum of the voters to ael OM collected tax revenues approved by the and approve the t;ransibr of indiction. for a 7-Eleven 7-Eleven store stthere a ed forre e a a[ one of the he bu husiest But eves the Town Board had followed proper procedure intersections in town? and the voters had approved the transfer of jurisdiction to There are already numerous town the Trustees, we don't believe the Trustees can assume that sell the e very same sell y same items as a 7markets that -Elems as a 7-Eleven. ven. authority unless the State Legislature authorizes it. Won't this hurt the e3dsting businesses? The Board of Trustees is a creature of the State Legislature . Does the town need another late night Like all creatures of the state, it has only such powers as the hangout? state grants t to it. e Iunderstandthatifthe7-Eleven meets all of the existing rotting requirements, it It's a thorny and complicated legal issue, but it's one the will be approved regardless of communi- town needs to tackle head on to "bulletproof" its efforts to ty opposition.But if itdoesnotmeetthe protect the shoreline and estuaries. Besides, the town seems rom"g requirements no special variances should be applied. to be asking an awful lot of its five-member Board of Trustees Jon Ferns and their duties keep expanding, as we have seen. The town could correct jurisdictional problems and al- "V66 , ieviate the burden on the Trustees by following the rec- Mattituck ammcndations the LWr2P coordinating council made last To the Editor store ? Are you serf us? to re- p- place Another ieptember: entrust to professional staff the review and a p- you serious? :)roval of permits for moorings, docks, groins and all struc- Although a 7-Eleven is already less :ures in state-raters and wetlands or within 100 feet of a than six miles east of where the new store xetland or bluff line. may be built, there is a proposal to build a new 28,000-square-foot 7-Eleven liter- At the same time the town should tighten up the code to ally down the road. What's next? At this nake such review truly'rtanisteriai, as it should be. In its rate, in 10 years Mattimckwill be next =rent foram, town code allows far too much discretion to to Riverhead with all our "convenience" naive requirements intended to protect the shoreline, as stores We have a CVS across the street, Waldbaum's~ Subway yell as riparian rights and the public right of access to the a and a Mi helanelo's ls than 200 yard shore. We're hoping the new dock code now in develop- way. elangloeshanards nent will do just that. y There is absolutely no need for another store. How about the Planning Board preserving our beautiful farms and wineries? Since the property has already been sold, how about making something ART DEPARTMENT - useful for the children so we don't have Lois Art Director ME NT to loiter outside Waldbaum's? a Fn m i c.nAurelnn AAon Door C.ir u a Veronica Steber- arnde 10 d` 'A ng ase TFo the Editor: Mattituck Probably the store least needed in Mattitnck is one such as 7-Eleven, especially at the at the proposed location - intersect' 12 Mid Main Road ( of Factory ttAvenue .11 station). Ahead y Citgo gas ' and congested Y °ne of [he busiest area e intersections in an where there are at least the "mom-and-pop„ delis, a two CVS a street and Mattituck Plaza cross _ mediately to t im he east, there is abso- lutely no e too need for this store. There az many e delivery trucks serving thes stores now and a.7- will obviously bri Elevell store n e and traffic wR gin more trucks a . min which will create greater - t area: rw.- 7-~ de ven grade safety k 7-F,, this will be another ' See Letters, next page - ?From previous pay, any eyesore in this area. This see I understand present zoning would time to pr probabl7 permit the store. however if town meeti it does not or if the proposed design creating a n plan does not meet existing zoning ment. and a requirements or there is a plan for regulatory a expansion, the town must not give ap- budget of $ proval or allow any special variances. the new dep Also the planning and zoning ment to supk boards must recall that during the the technical); CVS hearings, with regard to safety management ,E and congestion, New York State expertise th ;E Department of Transportation man- is presently dated that there be no entrance/exit lacking in thl openings onto Main Road. Therefore Trustees. Thy the same mandate must apply in the new agency i 7-Eleven situation. couldincorp'., Michael A. Kelly tees such as Zontn_gBoa; 'Rendered obsotete' Advisory C°~_ Southold ' managemen' To the Editor: There is m. Congratulations to Denise Civiletti, a change in c Tom Rozakis and Steven Resler for practices. Th exposing the Trustees as town officials impacting o operating without a fully legal portfolio owners are r ("The late, great Andros Hoax;' Oct. tions for hig' 23). They are managing our coastal 'rains in a d resources armed with a legal authority their propen as substantial as the "emperor's new actions will i! clothes." This may explain why the Addressing t I MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMB#S P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE O~aOF SQUjGOI Southold, NY 11971 Chair l OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS 41 Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR C40 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON p~ s Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND (cor. Main ut Rd. & l Youngs COU~ ~ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765.3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Gerard P. Goehringer, ZBA Chairman Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair SS Members of the Planning Board Date: October 21, 2008 Re: Seven Eleven Store SCTM#1000-142-1-27 ZBA# 6219 The Planning Board received your request for comments regarding the above referenced application for variances for a retail (convenience) store, zoned Businesses District and located on the n/e corner of Main Road and Factory Avenue, Mattituck. The subject parcel is approximately 25,000 sf. and has an existing 1,950 sq. foot building on site. The proposal is to add a 750 sq. foot addition to the existing building resulting in a 2,700 sq. ft. building. The application has been reviewed for site development and the following comments are for the Zoning Board's consideration. Setbacks for proposed buildings: Section 280-50c "A project shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have no more than 60 linear feet of frontage on one street". Section280-49 Bulk Schedule for setbacks "The Bulk Schedule allows a minimum single side yard setback of 25 feet, and a minimum rear yard setback of 35 feet. Following the proposed construction, existing rear yard setback of 21.8 feet will remain, and the side yard setback will be reduced to 24.2 feet". The Planning Board would support an addition to the existing building but would recommend that they comply with the side yard setback of 25 feet for the following reasons: 1 ZBA # 6219, Seven Eleven Store 1. Although the side yard request is minor and the rear yard currently exists, the use can be achieved by having a smaller addition. An addition of 750 sf. to the existing building triggers three variances. Any hardship claimed in requesting the variances is self-created, and a building that does not need variances can likely be achieved by making the addition smaller to meet the side yard setback. 2. This site is already located in front of a preexisting larger strip mall. Therefore, the request in excess of the 60 linear feet along State Road 25 would not create any additional impact to the view shed of the Main Road. 3. This is an existing site having a building with a substandard rear yard. The proposed addition will be maintaining the existing rear yard setback of 21.8 feet. Although, the applicant is extending the addition to the east an additional 25 feet there will be no adverse impact to adjacent parcels. The site is surrounded on the north and east by a parking lot and the building with substantial landscaping will help screen this area from the Main Road. Summary: As always, precedent is a concern but taking into consideration that this is a previously developed site, is located in front of the Waldbaums shopping center, has no impact to any view shed, will screen adjacent parking areas and will be reviewed by the Architectural Review Committee, the Planning Board would support an addition. However, an addition that meets the side yard setback of 25 feet is recommended. The applicant can easily comply with the side yard and only have two variance requests and would not require substantial relief from the Zoning Board. We hope that the information provided to you is helpful. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact the Planning Department. Thank you. 2 WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, October 20, 2008 4:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda 4:45 p.m. Subdivisions Subdivisions Project name: AylwardtAkscin SCTM# 1000-89-1-1 & 3.1 Location: 14105 Main Bayview Road, 650 feet west of intersection of South Bay iew and Cedar Beach Road, in Southold Description: This application is for a lot line modification per a Stipulation of Settlement dated July 1, 2008. Mr. W. Aylward will receive a deed to a parcel of land on the westerly and northerly boundaries of his property containing .73 acres (SCTM#1 000-89-1-3. 1) to be merged with his residence parcel of 1.84 acres for a total lot size of 2.57 acres. Mr. Akscin will receive a deed for the northerly 3.48 acres (SCTM#1000-89- 1-1) which will require access approval over an existing and improved 30.5 foot wide easement across land owned by Suzanne Sullivan Fraser.; Status: Open I Action: Review Lot Line Change . Attachments: Staff Report ; Project name: Arthur Torell SCTM# y 1000-33-2-10 &11 . Location: 365 Westwood Lane, 300 feet north of Homestead Way, Greenport _ _ - - - Description: This lot line change will reduce Parcel 1 (SCTM#1000-33-2-10) by 2,430 sq. ft. in order to create as far a setback as possible for the proposed dwelling from the wetlands. Parcel 1 existing area size is 21,458 sq. ft., and after the lot line modification, it will be 19,028 sq. ft. Parcel 2 (SCTM#1000-33-2-11) will increase in size after the lot line modification from 24,756 sq. ft. to 27,186 sq. ft. These parcels are located in the R- 40 Zone. Status: Open Action: Review New Application Attachments: None - For Discussion: Project name: Seven Eleven SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Location: 9945 NYS Route 25, Mattituck Description: This site plan is for a 750 sq. ft. addition to an existing 1,950 sq. ft. building having a total 2,700 sq. ft. for retail use (convenience store) on a: 24, 829 sq. ft. parcel in the Business Zone. Status: Request for Comments by the ZBA Action: Review plans, convenience store comparisons and draft comments to the. ZBA regarding variances. Attachments: Draft Comments - To Be Distributed at Work Session PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law V 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries October 17, 20Q8.. Ms. Jeni Woodhouse, Chairwoman and Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 r att: Kristy Winser Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Kristy: In accordance with my letter of October 7th enclosed are, three prints of a detailed plan prepared by Kempy Engineering which includes the landscaping and traffic circulation which is being reviewed by the NYSDOT. I understand from the news paper that the Board discussed this application and is being asked by the ZBA for comments, I would request a meeting with the Planning Board or staff to review the plan prior to final comments. With advance notice I could ask the engineer to be present. Please note the following: A. The owner is providing 23 spaces, almost double the parking required for "retail uses" 14 spaces. Unlike other 7/11 structures throughout Southold, internal traffic and parking has been thoroughly addressed. B. Significant landscaping has been added to the existing developed property. This landscaping was requested by Planning and accepted by the owner. This site is surrounded by the Walbaums Shopping Center which is a sea of parking and asphalt. C. There are presently three uses on this parcel and the owner has proposed a reduction to one use. The removal of the gas canopy will be a significant aesthetic visual improvement to this corner. D Traffic circulation, as reported by the Suffolk Times, are directly caused by existing surrounding developed parcels ( Ice cream shop, boat shop and businesses) which are substandard with respect to meeting the code. The development of this parcel, which reduces the number of existing uses, improves the existing conditions and meets the code. The redevelopment of this parcel continues the Town's efforts of upgrading the existing conditions. However, this parcel can not correct the traffic 0 • issues created by other properties and are unrelated to this property. As previously stated, my client has requested the minimal variance necessary for the proper functioning of a 7-11 store. The existing building is only 30 feet in depth and was a repair garage therefore it is constructed on a slab (no basement) . There is inadequate space for storage or utilities. The additional square footage is the minimal storage area needed by a 7-11 store and the safe placement of utilities. Moreover, the proposed size of the building is proportional to the size of the property and is only 11 % of the parcel. The proposed expansion of the square footage of the existing building is on the side and does not impact the traffic circulation . The Planning Board has recommended additional landscaping on the north-west side of the property which eliminates access to the rear of the property. The only variance is for continuation of the existing rear yard setback and for the length of the building. The 60 foot rule was legislated into the Zoning Ordinance in 1995 as a remedial attempt to limit development of "shopping centers". This provision in the code is the subject of constant applications for variances by commercial properties because it does not relate to the size of the property, setbacks provided in the particular business zoning districts or single use occupancy. As this building is surrounded by a shopping center, the linear length of the building is dwarfed by the surrounding shopping center, and two much larger buildings (the Celic shopping center and the CVS building) across the street. Thank you for your continued courtesies. Very._tru"rs, P cia C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. Vivian Kamath P.O. Box 418 Mattituck, NY 11952 October 16, 2008 Southold Town Supervisor / Southold Town Planning Board I/ Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Supervisor & Planning Board: I cannot believe what I just read in today's Suffolk Times, that you are considering a 7-11 for the corner of Factory Ave. and the Main Road in Mattituck. Most residents did not want the expansion of the Hess station just east of the above location; you may recall that plan was voted down. Many did not want the car wash at the proposed location of the 7-11 so why would anyone think a 7-11 would be appropriate. The immediate area already has deli's, restaurants, Starbucks, Subway, Chinese take out, pizza and a Handy Pantry. Do we really need a 7-11? Please accept this letter as my vote for no 7-11 in Mattituck. Furthermore, the area in question already has way too much especially that corner. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to no 7-11. Sincerely, ,J Roberta M. Kalous 25-Year Mattituck Resident Page Two 1#4/08 Planning Board Work SessitAgenda - - Project name Romanelh Realty SCTM# 197-3-3.1 - _ Location 36660 NYS Route 25, Cutchogue - Description: This site plan is for the demolition of 3,999 s.f. of existing contractors / storage buildings and New Construction of three (3) Buildings that total 12,400 s.f. of contractors, retail (shop) & warehouse storage use where the Principal Use Building 1 = 6,000 s.f. Principal Use Building 2 = 2,800 s.f. , Principal Use Building 3 = 3,600 s.f. on a 63,338 s.f. parcel in the Limited Business (LB) Zoning District Status: Request for comments by the ZBA Action: Review plans and draft comments to the ZBA regarding variances Attachments: Draft Comments - Project name: Seven Eleven SCTM# 142-1-27 j Location: 9945 NYS Route 25, Mattituck Description: This site plan is for a 750 s.f. addition to an existing 1,950 s f building having a total 2,700 s.f for retail use (convenience store) on a 24,829 s.f. parcel in the Business Zone. Status: Request for comments by the ZBA Action: Review plans and draft comments to the ZBA regarding variances - Attachments:..... Comments Add-on agenda item: Conservation Subdivisions Discuss the cases where a conservation subdivision is intended for the future, and the landowner prefers to close on the development rights prior to applying for the subdivision. 2 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries October 7, 2008 Ms. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman and Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 att: KristyWinser Re: GAMA Deer Park (7-11), Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Dear Kristy: In response to your letter dated September 19`h, 2008 please note the following: A. Reimbursement to the Town of SEQRA review fee. I have forwarded your letter to Vivian Kamath, the contact person on the previous project. He will be calling Heather directly since his records reflect certain payments and discussions with her that no additional fees were outstanding. This bill should not interfere with your review of a new project. In addition, SEQRA review on this project should be initiated as soon as possible. The use of this existing building which has been reduced from three uses (garage, gas station and accessory convenience store) to a sole use of a structure (retail store) and is less than 4,000 sq.ft. must be, by definition, determined to be a Type II action (617.5 (7)). B. With regard to the completeness of the application. When I delivered the application and proposed site plan I was specifically told not to give your office a check for the filing fee because the Town does not cash the check until the application is accepted as complete and in the past checks were being left in files. Therefore, once you advise me, I have my client's check ready in my file for the fee. As you know this project requires a variance from the Southold Town Zoning Board of •Pgklee We would ask that you review the preliminary drawings and site plan, to the extent practicable. Once the variance is granted, we will proceed with the engineefing details needed on the site plan. C. - -mid long EAF was submitted and I have confirmed with you that it was received on Set. 9`h. As previously stated, this is a Type II action. I D. We will start revising the plan in accordance with applicable items 3-13 in your letter E. The plan is being re-submitted to the NYSDOT within the week for the single use. With regard to the variance request, my client has requested the minimal variance necessary for the proper functioning of a 7-11 store. The existing building is only 30 feet in depth and was a repair garage therefore it is constructed on a slab (no basement). There is inadequate space for storage or utilities. The additional square footage is the minimal storage area needed by a 7-11 store and the safe placement of utilities. Moreover, the proposed size of the building is proportional to the size of the property. By example the Cutchogue 7-11 is 60' x 49' or 2,940 sq.ft.. The proposed expansion of the square footage of the existing building is on the side and does not impact the traffic circulation . The only variance is for continuation of the existing rear yard setback and for the length of the building. The 60 foot rule was legislated into the Zoning Ordinance in 1995 as a remedial attempt to limit development of "shopping centers". This provision in the code is the subject of constant applications for variances by commercial properties because it does not relate to the size of the property, setbacks provided in the particular business zoning districts or single use occupancy. As this building is surrounded by a shopping center, the linear length of the building is dwarfed by the surrounding shopping center, and two much larger buildings (the Celic shopping center and the CVS building) across the street. I am always optimistic that the Zoning Board, who has the institutional memory of the purposes of the 60 foot rule, will grant the variance. As soon as the revisions your requested are placed on the site plan we will schedule a pre- submission meeting to get a running start on a final site plan. Thank you for your continued courtesies. Vsry ru ours, ricia C. Moore cc: Gama Properties-Deer Park Inc. Vivian Kamath . MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS O f soy P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE O~~ lyOl Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON ~0 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ~yCOUNNI Southold, NY fl l , Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE V1+{ FAx', t9 (o I - nq~(a TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 6, 2008 Mr. Vivian Kamath 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 RE: Warex Project- SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Municipal SEQR Review Dear Mr. Kamath: Enclosed is a copy of our Purchase Order #18394 for Municipal SEQRA review through February 20, 2008 in connection with your client's site plan before the Planning Board. Pursuant to 6NYCCR Part 617, State Environmental Quality Review, the Town may charge a fee to the applicant to recover the costs of SEQR reviews. Accordingly, you have made a partial payment of $1,500 towards the total amount of $4,235. Therefore please have your client send a check in the amount of $2,735 payable to the Town of Southold. Sincerely, / J Krist y isner Senior Planner Enc. cc: Heather Lanza, Planning Director • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS OF SD(/T P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND lycoUNTV,Nc~ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 19, 2008 Patricia C Moore Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Gama Deer Park( 7-11), Mattituck Dear Ms. Moore; Thank you for your letter dated September 8, 2008 stating that your client wishes to withdraw their previous application and has submitted a new application for the above mentioned, we cannot process this application further until the Department is reimbursed for the SEQR fee of $4,235.00 for the prior application. As a courtesy we have made the initial review of the above referenced site plan application to establish the completeness of the submission. We have determined that the application is currently incomplete based on the submission requirements for a site plan application for the following reasons stated below. We cannot process this application further until we receive a complete application see Town Code § 280-133 for the site plan application requirements, an application fee for the proposed see Town Code § 280-138 A. for the fee schedule and for you to schedule a pre-submission conference as required. Any comments provided below which go beyond the completeness of the application are provided for your information and consideration. Additional comments will be provided following full review by staff, the Town Planning Board, Town departments and involved/interested agencies. 1. There should be an Environmental Assessment Form fully and accurately CI_c~~ completed as part of the application submission. q\~ 2. Thought should be given to reduce the size of the building that may lend itself to a better site design and reduce the amount of variances before the Zoning Board of Appeals. 3. Show Suffolk County Tax Map number in lower right hand title box of each sheet. 4. Show key map clearly indicating subject property. 5. Show zoning, ownership, and use of subject and adjacent properties. 6. Show existing and proposed utilities on site: water, sanitary/storm sewer, and electrical points of connection. Show all utility appurtenances and the method of screening from public view. 7. Identify location of proposed or nearest existing fire hydrants and fire access roadway routes. 8. Show landscape calculation and detail (minimum 20% of lot, excluding required buffer zones). A minimum of 50% of all required landscaping shall be located within the front yard area of the site. Show installation of a hedge, berm and/or decorative fence to screen all parking areas. 9. Submit lighting plan and detail of lighting fixtures. Lighting shall be oriented and shielded so as not to illuminate or glare on adjoining properties or roadways. 10. Submit copy of NYSDOT permit for work within right of way. Approval shall be required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. ii. Show cross section detail of on site and street improvements. 12. State elevation datum. 13. Show detail of drainage structures on site. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, / Kris ty Win Senior Planner CC: Planning Board APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS. Ig SOUry • Mailing Address: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box I 1 Ruth D. Oliva Southold, NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio, Jr. Office Location: Michael A. Simon O Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman ~~~OUNTV 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765-9064 MEMO TO: Planning Board FROM: Gerard P. Goehringer, ZBA Chairman DATE: September 16, 2008 SUBJECT: Request for Comments ZBA #6219 - GAMA DEER PARK INC. (SEQR pending under ZBA #5906) As confirmed with your office, the ZBA is reviewing the following application, and enclosed copies of Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, ZB application, and latest map. The Planning Board may be involved under the site plan review steps under Chapter 280 (Zoning), and your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience for reference if needed. NAME TAX # / ZBA BD NOD VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER ZONE DATE DATE STAMPED GAMA DEER 142-1-27 8219 8/12/2008 280 49 9/8108 Kempey PARK INC. 7/29/08 280-50C Engineering Your comments are appreciated by October 12, 2008. Thank you. Encls. FORM NO. 3 / NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 29, 2008 AMENDED: August 12, 2008 AMEDDED: September 4, 2008 TO: Patricia C. Moore (GAMA Properties) 51020 Alain Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated July 8, 2008 For permit to make additions and alterations converting an existing gas station and convenience store to a convenience store at Location of property: 9945 Route 25, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 142 Block 1 Lot 27 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on Chis 24,829 square foot parcel in the B District is not permitted pursuant to Ai•ticl,e ILI Section 280-49, which states "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference with the same force and effect as if such re ulauons were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule allows a minimum single side yard setback of 25 feet and a minimum rear yard setback of 35 feet. Following the proposed construction the building will maintain an existing side yard setback of r/- 21 67 feet, and a rear yard setback of 24.16 feet. Also, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XI Section 280-50 C which states; _AproJecl shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than 60 linear teet of frontage on one street." Following theT_ut~osed construction, the building will have +/-90 feet of frontage on Main Road The proposed use reeLuires site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. This Notice of Disapproval was written based on a site plan dated 6/27/8 by Kempey Engineering and amended on August 12, 2008, to correct errors. This notice was further amended on September 4, 2008, to removed the need for a variance under Article XI, 280-50 A. based on Article XI, B, per certification of adjacent setbacks, dated August 30, 2008, by George Brush LS. / r ature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by line Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A.. PLANNING APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS ee: $ Filed By: Date Assigned/Assignment No. fice Notes: House No. 9945 Street Route 25 Hamlet Mattituck CTM 1000 Section 142 Block 01 Lot(s) 27 Lot Size 24,829 Zone B District I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED July 29, 2008, last amended September 4, 2008 BASED ON MAP DATED 6-27-08 Applicant(s)/Owner(s): Gama Deer Park, Inc Mailing Address: c/o GAZ Realty. Inc.. 366 North Braadwav, Suite 206 Jericho New York 11753 Telephone: 516-513-0155 Ext 333 Fax Email: NOTE: In addition to the above, please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: Patricia C. Moore Esq. for ( X) Owner, or ( ) Other: Agent's Address: 51020 Main Road. Southold NY 11971 Telephone 631-765-4330 Fax 7654643 Email: pcmooorelgoptonline.net Please check box to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above names: ? Applicant/Owner(s), or E Authorized Representative, or ? Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED MAP DATED June 27.2008 and plans dated June 13, 2007 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED July 8, 2208 FOR: E Building Permit ? Certificate of Occupancy ? Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ? Change of Use ? Permit for As-Built Construction ? Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.) Article XI Section 280-50 Subsection C Article X Section 280-49 Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: E A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ? A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ? Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section ? Reversal or Other A prior appeal E has , has not been made at any time with respect to this property, UNDER Appeal No. 4290 - Vear1-4-95_(Canopy)_. 3788 1-11-91 (Accessory Convenience store to Gas Station) 1225 12-12-68 (Special Exc gas station) 5906 8-21-07 (open- 3 uses-car wash)-discontinued (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance.) Name of Owner: GAMA Properties ZBA File k i • REASONS FOR APPEAL (additional sheets may be used with preparer's siEnature)• AREA VARIANCE REASONS: (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: The property is a corner lot with 150 feet along Factory Avenue & 198 feet long Rt 25. Behind and adjacent to the parcel is the Mattituck Shopping Center parking Lot. No vehicular access is proposed between the subject parcel and the Mattituck Shopping Center. The existing parcel contains a gas station which was granted from the ZBA a special exception in 1969 and has continued to operate as a gas station with a three bay repair garage. In 1990 the ZBA granted approval to operate a convenience store, as accessory to the existing gas station. The gas station and repair garage bays remain and the convenience store was permitted by Board action. In 1995 the canopy was added to the gas station, this canopy will also be removed for the single use convenience store. Therefore, at present, the property contains a full gasoline service station, three bays for car repair, a convenience store, and a canopy. The proposed application will no longer operate the gas station or the three bay repair garage, the activity at this site will be significantly reduced to one retail use ( a stand alone 7- I1 convenience store). Retail convenience store is a permitted use in the Business zoning district. The proposed variance for rear yard setback is required because the existing building is nonconforming with respect to rear yard. The proposed addition to the existing building will continue the existing rear setback. The property is surrounded by the Mattituck Shopping Center parking lot and the location of the building retains 21 feet around the rear of the property. The surrounding properties are all developed The addition to the existing building does not change the character of this business district. The variance from the 60 foot linear rule is misplaced at this parcel because the property is surrounded by the Mattituck Shopping Center building. The shopping center structure exceeds 60 linear feet (the Mattituck Shopping Center is close to 500 linear feet). The proposed improvements to the building will be in character with businesses in the area. The new CVS, across the street, has been improved and exceeds 60 feet in width. The expansion is required by the 7-11 to meet their operational needs. The building is narrow, only 30 feet in width, and the store must have adequate isle width, interior circulation and storage. (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: The existing building will be used as one retail use with a small expansion on the east side. The elimination of the gas station with a convenience store, repair garage, and canopy will be a significant reduction in the intensity of uses. The existing building needs to accommodate the proposed 7-I1, the site plan shows extensive parking and traffic circulation. The existing building will not be expanded towards either of the roads. The additional 25 feet towards the easterly property line will not impact the adjacent parcel because it is a commercial parking lot with a grade difference which prevents access. The adjacent owner has refused a cross easement in the past. (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: The existing setbacks to the street are maintained. The only expansion is to the east which maintains a set back of 24 feet to the property line. The rear property line permits access to the back of the building. The parcel is surrounded by asphalt parking from Mattituck Shoping Center. The elimination of the garage and gas station, gas pumps, canopy and only one use for the premises is a significant reduction in the intensity of the commercial use of the property. This area of Mattituck has preexisting commercial parcels which should be encouraged to be improved. The removal of the canopy and three garage bays will be a significant improvement to the visual character of the Business District. The architectural improvements to the building will enhance the continued redevelopment of the Mattituck shopping center area. The proposed with of the building will be visually insignificant by the architectural features to the building and the juxtaposition of the surrounding 500 linear feet of the Mattituck Shopping Center in the back ground. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The property is fully developed, contains a gas station, canopy, permitted convenience store and repair bays. The redevelopment of the property has proposed road improvements which will benefit the Mattituck community and improve the general traffic flow of the Mattituck Business District. (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? ( )Yes, or (X )No. The property is already developed and the setbacks of the existing building are established. The building is preexisting and exceeds the 60 foot rule. The modest expansion is reasonable and necessary for the reduction of uses to the building from an accessory convenience store to a stand alone convenience store. The lot has 199 linear feet of frontage on Route 25 and limiting the width of the building to 60 feet is not practical given the depth of the property and size of the existing building. Are there Covenants and Restrictions concerning this land: E No. ? Yes (please furnish copy). This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Check this box O IFA USE VARIANCE IS BEING REQUESTED, AND PLEASE COMPLETE THE ATTACHED 0 0 USE VARIANCE SHEET. (Please be sure to consult your actor ey. i i S re of Appellant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Sworn before me this day o 20 0 otary Publi . BETSYA PERKINS (Mary Pudic. Stets of New Yo* No. 01 PE 6130636 9 qualified In Suffolk CaaNy / Cannwmn Expkea My, QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION OWNER: GAMA Properties-Deer Park Inc CTM: 1000-142-1-27 A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? ? Yes E No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? E No ? Yes, please explain on attached sheet. C. 1) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? No 2) Are these areas shown on the map submitted with this application? No 3) Is the property bulkheaded between the wetlands area and the upland building area? N/A 4) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Please confum status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved map. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? No E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? Yes- site plan of proposed does not show existing canoov (Please show area of these structures on a diagram if any exist. Or state "none" on the above line, if applicable.) F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? No If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department and describe: G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? No If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your map with this application. H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel as station with convenience store, canopy. 3 bays for repair garage and proposed use one retail store ( 7-11 convenience store (exam isting: single-family; proposed: same with garage or pool, or other description.) A t1r tzed Signature and Date 2/05; 1/07 APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For ZBA Reference) Applicant: Owner: Gama Deer Park, Inc. Date Prepared: September 8, 2008 1. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: none II. New Construction Areas : Dimensions of first floor extension: existing: 30' x 65' addition: 30' x 25' Dimensions of new second floor: none Dimensions of floor above second level: None Height (from finished ground to top of ridge): 20' Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? No If yes, please provide height (above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: 111. Proposed Construction if Existing Building Alterations or Structural Changes (attach extra sheet if necessary) - Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: existing building is a gas station with three repair bays with an area approved as an accessory convenience store and a canopy Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: one floor IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage all buildings on property (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 1950 sa.ft. Proposed increase of building coverage: 750 sg.ft. (25' x 30') Square footage of your lot: 24,829 sg.ft. Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 11% V. Purpose of New Construction: addition to existing commercial building VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): the land is flat, fully developed with a gas station canopy and permitted accessory convenience store The building sits on slab and does not have adequate storage space for the proposed convenience store. Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction), and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries September 8, 2008 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Southold Town Planning Board Mrs. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman c j Southold Town Hall I 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: GAMA Deer Park, Inc (Mattituck 7-11)' 1000-142-1-27 Dear Chairpersons and Board members: The owner wishes to withdraw the previous application for accessory car wash and submit the enclosed application to construct addition to the existing building. This application will convert existing garage structure, accessory convenience store and three repair bays to the one retail use. The gas dispensing island and canopy will be removed. The existing uses on the property will be reduced to one retail use (7-11 convenience store). Enclosed please find an application for site plan and an application for variances required to expand existing building for the above referenced property. Please place this matter on the calender at the earliest possible date. Ve r yours, atricia C. Moore Cc: GAMA Deer Park, Inc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBE* . MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE SOSouthold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON Q JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND • (coy. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) l~CQU~ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 21, 2008 Mr. Vivian Kamath 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 RE: Warex Project - SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Municipal SEQR Review Dear Mr. Kamath: Enclosed is a copy of our Purchase Order #18394 for Municipal SEQRA review through February 20, 2008 in connection with your client's site plan before the Planning Board. 7 Pursuant to 6NYCCR Part 617, State Environmental Quality Review, the Town may charge a fee to the applicant to recover the costs of SEQR reviews. Accordingly, please have your client send a check in the amount of $4,235 payable to the Town of Southold. 1Sincerely, 14 _ ~t bps Heather Lanza, AICP Planning Director, Enc. cc: Bruno Semon WL ~FFO(t © SrOWN OF SOUTHOLO Purchase Order # 18394 Tax Exempt * A163554 Date p , 2cpg Account # SW -,300 Deliver and send billing to: Vendor ~ 1 41 (A Department pl a te; tJvkso-n POD 6`/00~ s Address 1 --)92. (,vkzLmQ,yN RL ~ L dvi1~e, NY ??1L+~ VENDOR "Return this copy and Town of Southold voucher itemized and signed for payment*" ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL UQ re~~ecA7 THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE DEPT. HEAD AND THE SUPERVISOR I CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE SUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAILABLE IN THE PPROPFih ACHARGED De . ead I CERTIFY THIS TO BE A JUST AND UE PURCHA E ORDER -11 -70-C 4-rA Su NISor 17Z'NT1llTJ /'l1DV 3V, § > > '3Sc 4 r v SY ` 4ir1 y'S~ F f •)r a3s d'~rd 4` ;?r'w +,~rr ~'..4 ' , 1.1 L•i I Arta^''~`sF-yYe' 1'6+ x3 r~. i.. i YY'.V, 4 r- ,.c. t L r`dY r ~Jy a rt•~i . 'V 1'. Y c + vy 'LT. 1~'` ,J ~2v.cK r' L$. 1~i~ r VT ~C J ~ '1- w }L+ 'per, _ i!l I ,r ~t'F ,•r F / h ¢~1 L~ ,~7y a~ I; ~,-n+ e~ i~r 1Jiz g - -y ~9t 4 tICU$ 1+4~I J, 1 1B.FdI a Y ~V I E ~ ~ ~ ys _-,'1,+(~i a I, S~)rr ~ FFtFh Yrt"~ q~~ F Is~'~`fk 7. {.f r, i'; J ! 't X41 Ril~t4~V 'V A2"N~dd ~ilr tN"rtJ r 5= 1j~ Mf',1 j t h 6 t iy Il I .sN 'ff+ 4x { i f Et•~ g M1y L(r ,r _ 114,5fkj~~pk15~ - j - .144 'a ~i!~, ~ aryl kll •F,t j1. ~'fV l9 f~ii +`fl~'~r~+1 S~~~t ~ C 9 - ' -I Z- t g t o ~ r ~pG~ C u ~ VV ~ LE j \ 2 Z Q 9 ~ 44 p J o ~ - ° 6 ~d Idd r~ -`-J qao" OZ! _ 59L I_9 pl-I Xti~ U8S'D'3 91•III•IIJti~d PIPIQl illOH.li1QS ~ 4108 ive?son, Pope & Vo h1-s, LLC Property: 07298 Project: VA02518 572 Walt Whitman Road Phone: -427-5665 MelvillE NY 11747 Fax: 631 27-5620 Warex Project, Mattituck Manager: Voorhis, Charles Invoice To: Town of Southold Planning Board Invoice 5732 Town Hall, 53095 State Rte 25 Invoice Date: March 31, 2008 PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971-0959 Attention: Heather Lanza MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO NELSON POPE & VOORHIS Invoice Amount $4,235, 00 Professional Services Bill Hours Bill Rate Charge Municipal SEQRA Review Work Performed thru 2/20/08 Administrative Assistant Municipal SEQR Review 0.25 80.00 20.00 Environmental Planner Municipal SEQR Review 1.50 110.00 165.00 Managing Partner Municipal SEQR Review 11.75 200.00 2,350.00 Planner Municipal SEQR Review 20.00 85.00 1,700.00 Municipal Total: 33.50 $4,235.00 Professional Services Totals $4,235.00 Total Project Invoice Amount 54,235.00 All invoices are due net 3o days. A late charge of I % per month will be added to any unpaid balance after 30 days. Please make all checks payable to NELSONPOPE & VOORHIS Please include invoice number on check NELSON POPE & VOORHIS NOW ACCEPTS CREDIT CARDS VISA - MASTERCARD - AMERICAN EXPRESS , T - 'a ~2 i i J k Rendering 7 Eleven, Mattituc k ism > 'Q , . s r ~ a ~ Vii. ' } p ~~rr a • fir= 4p }~J~ . ^r. w r 4 7r ~ -ddg~ ~i yr ~ rX ~ by i ~~i1. r',A ~7~ S r R T ,;.d i ,i I~~ F l.y ..~y,. {b S -ti,. i, viii 1 r`rtr~,•j J• SI r 1 t{.1 i } c tt{, Yt 4.1 ` .d+r ,,~+7 4 *•~S 1~+ ~1u~~ / r1l rl1.,y1 ZklCPi~ r~.'rr J~ f Y r~,44frflfi~ .SXZ rY'1,rt. Xkh_ f~ a r~~•, ~ r Yr. ~ , r4~~~r -S y'yyr ,~1~"i. Y r ~v, r '777 ///y~~~'r,,, r~• ' '`~y 1a~~ ~4 G.. i+; a.y lid it?%i • f , 11 IN - J. f its 1 11 I ~ ~ L. r~~ ;9 ll! IN AIN& „ - a 4WD ^?T.,a .IL s.. SG•r'r'Y~:r'=~4iPri';','m.~ 9945 rt 25, Mattituck 142-1-27 5 ;tn , 4U"' , fi '~.[~d~i ~ ~ ~ "~L6' . }fir ~ ~ S \ ~ - - y ~ f,.i% r~ ? ' 5 fi S. .~J`' / .f I': / .fit. ? \ .F/ • J"/ ? f s °7 I ri \ F',Y~ 1 pig ` w 4f•~~~~j~' yy id:]: 41 40P,,# 40' 4f Ilk fa tea, .a•~~1~~,,y ~ .•r/ r '+rfR_ ~ t ~s.. ~w.~°j .'x~,, ~s'.ar .A A f - fa ' A.''s 00 e4 1~ > T ++1 • y~ , .'its f~ y". ~,~.:r`-„r ,s4"' * s P ' 1 1 ~s,`' r~ .t kt ,fi rte. ~f' j i~c fi t ' 'yam jjPyry,' 17 :f• R Lr 4 ~ R~3?, ~s ~ I ~s.r ~ ~ y~j ~ 'fit + ~ s `f t +t ~ f art ~ ~ J '7t1 L ~ ~ ~ ~•i:, . .`J n.' y - .flat . ; ;l • + M. 9945 rt 25, Mattituck 142-1-27 ` * ,g ~ L• t ~5fi t ~~yY~~~ r ~ - } ~w~~rC Aga, ~ W, r • ` w - J/,f d ter- ,fir°.k.'~ 'r.'i~.'s''~ "k_• ff " '''+.r a ~ ~ \ r .n'? ~r~ ~ fy k 44 ~Tw 4R Sly 40 V ~~!7~"~i ~ ~~~~d 1• ~ ~ ~ _ 'fir ~ t d,• 'A/ .L Ilk T- 4W ;Wl AW7 Y y]~. 04, S X F# ~.s ~ t., w!;~ . \ t ti } • r ,q1 1. !''~~r \ ' ° 4{ ~ y ` b 77777 # J pi, 9 ` o,Pit,'r rv ! t 9 ~j~1 r1,, ~ t• ~ ~ ~ rt M~,+'~' , ~ ~j~ fem. J 4j1 • S•1 ~ ~ •g -tS•` ~ ~ ~ ~ t,~, 1= T~ ,~'4 +iy N f ~1 Ii.n w' : . el~ P srt f. , ~ " fir' p 4 i / f f' 4A' f~ pp. ~I ! {-.4 r 1*~. r i1~ / •'~•'I f`L r~ . r~,w A SITE PLAN STATUS REPORT SITE PLAN TYPE: AMENDED NEW WITHDRAWN INCOMPLETE PROJECT NAME: " r -6 zoNEl: ZONE2: zONE3: SCOTM# 1 00 - HAMLET: AA~~ krc,~- OWNER NAME: M~ TEL# _ APPLICANT NAME: TEL# AGENT NAME: l l TEL# -_A330 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: _ STING USE: Yo PROPOSED USE: DATE BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE: SIP RE U N ZBA APPEAL REQUIRE R N / ~i PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRITTEN REQUEST) C n ~S~IVYS NOTES: )\0) -Co, <r a - S I INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: / / 1 APPLICATION RECEIVED DATE: a/ / APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: pv~ / / Q4S PAYMENT RECEIVED: AMOUNT RECEIVED:$ NEW SP: $500./ACRE &.10/SF, AMENDED SP: $250. +.10/SF, AGRIC SP: FLAT $500 FEE AMOUNT: .00 X 10 X SF=$ ) 1~ 0 NEW APPLICATION WORK SESSION (WITHIN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT), PB ACCEPTE Y R N APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REVIEW) BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEEETING 100-254B3 (WITHIN 30 DAYS) . i Ll 05T 06- NOTES: w 4 ` N. r M k w\a REVISED SUBMISSION RECEIVED : CArJ ~S S., +tU NOTES: REFERRED AGENCIES: (WITH MAPS=W/p) STZBA_,STB RESPONS D_~STClTB1J]__ , gTBT__,STEJSCDHS_,NYSDEC_~USACORPS_,NYSDOT_, SCWA , SCPD ES NOTES SCDPW , LWRP LEAD AGENCY: TosrOTHRR:_ RRVH:W; PARTI PART2PART3_,SHORTEAP_,LONG RAF NOTES: - ACTION TYPE: COORDINATED:_ UNCOORDINATED: (1rY2 E7:_ TVPE2: UNLISTED:_ REFERRED TO. STZBA_,STBD_,StQ7B_, JHSTBT STESCDHS~NYSDEC_,USACORPS_,NYSDOT_, SCWA 1 SCPD_ SCDPW_ SEQRA DETERMINATION :NEG DEC Y OR N, APPROVALS REQUIRED: REFERRED DATE NOTES APPROVAL DATE NOTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: LWRP COORDINATOR: BUILDING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: FIRE COMMISSIONERS: TOWN ENGINEER APPROVAL:/ / DEROF TRANSPORTATION : DOT , DPW_, T / / iLuO'u+N~ SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH :PERMIT # ~ OPTIONAL APPROVALS: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: APPEAL- BOARD OF TRUSTEE'S: M'S DEC WETLANDSRIDAUSPDES t. ?1 PLANNING BOARD DECISIONS: DENIED: APPROVED: CONDITIONAL FINAL: J / / FINAL: ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: NOTES FIELD INSPECTION FOR C/O: DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT I TOWN ENG / GENERAL NOTES: 1014/2065 Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Project: Seven Eleven Site Plan Preparer: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: December 6, 2010 1. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: Seven Eleven SCTM N#: 1000-142-1-27 Street Location: 9945 NYS Route 25, Mattituck Hamlet: Mattituck Zoning District: Business Type of Site Plan: Commerical Property Owner: Gama Deer Park, Inc Applicant: same Agent: Pat Moore Site Plan Prepared By: Kempey Engineering Date of Map: 10/10/08, last revised 11/12/10 II. Description of Site Plan Project Construction Type: Proposed 685 sq foot addition to existing building for retail use. Zoning Determination: The Notice of Disapproval indicates the need for site plan approval For additions and alterations, converting an existing gas station and convenience store to a convenience store. The proposed meets zoning. Call of meeting: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,985 s.f. Gas Station/convenience store and add a 685 sq. ft. addition, having a total of 2,670 s.f. for a retail use (convenience store) on a 24,829 s.f. parcel in the Business Zone located on the We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 SEQRA Classification: Type I I - no further Action Building size area: 2,670sq. ft Lot coverage: 11.06% (30% allowed) STtf Report Seven Eleven PJA III. Time line: ? Date of submission to PB: 9/9/08- incomplete ? Date of application accepted & W.S: 11/3/08 - referred out. ? ZBA denied variances: 1.22.09 ? Date new application submitted: 3/6/09, scheduled for work session 3/16/09 ? Date PB accepted application: 6/8/09 ? Date scheduled for P.H: 10/13/09 ? Request for Traffic analysis in Response to comments from PH: 12.6.10 ? Requested info submitted: 2.28.10 ? AKRF hired: 4.15.10 ? Request for additional info: 5.28.10 ? Responses submitted: 7.15.10 ? Request for revisions sent: 8.6.10 ? Revised traffic report submitted: 9.22.10 ? Revised site plans submitted 11.15.10 *Plans were to be submitted in accordance with the amended traffic report submitted 9.22.10. IV. Traffic Report Summary (last revised September 101: ? Although the development will generate some new additional traffic & utilizing a more conservative pass by rate, the adjacent roadway network can accommodate this traffic and no change in overall levels of service are predicted. o The traffic estimated by nearby new projects was included in the analysis. o Accident information was reviewed finding accident occurrence was lower than the statewide average for similar intersections. ? Operating conditions at this location will be improved over the existing condition and will operate in a safer manner due to the following: o Site access driveways have been limited from 3 to 2, and are located as far from the intersection as possible. o The applicant has been working with the NYSDOT whereby the applicant will dedicate the s/w corner of their property to better improve the turning radius for westbound Main Road to Northbound Factory Avenue. o As part of the proposed, only right turns into and out of the site will be accommodated on the Main Road, and full turning movements at the proposed driveway on Factory Ave. o All trucks making deliveries, as well as trash collection will do so via access driveway on the Main Road to enter/exit and not during peak hours. The applicant has provided a letter stating the above and proposed signage at the Factory Ave entrance states "No Trucks". o The above-mentioned improvements will also improve interior site circulation. A Report Seven Eleven Pagl* o The site driveway on Factory Ave will be relocated to a point as far north of Main Road as possible and will reduce potential for conflicts with vehicles entering and exiting the ice cream store. ? Egress/ingress located at Factory Avenue: o The site plans have been revised to address concerns of unsafe conditions due to a non standard radius for the egress/ingress located at Factory Avenue. The turning radius has been changed from 3'-6" to 9'-2" and driving aisles have been widened from 25-28'-3" to facilitate better movement to and from the site. o The longest average queue expected is 94 feet during peak summer hours. Since the distance from the site driveway to the stop line on southbound Factory Avenue is slightly over 110 feet, under such occasions the queue would not extend beyond the driveway. ? Parking: Parking as proposed is adequate for safe site operation. V. Approvals Necessary Prior to Approval: ? Health Department Approval Received. Permit #C10-09-0007 ? Highway work permit from the NYS DOT is still pending. VI. Issues Remaining to be Resolved: ? Traffic Study - options ? Note: The traffic report addressed the concerns raised from the Public Hearing and has been corroborated by an independent traffic engineering firm (AKRF) hired by the Town to review it. (a) Accept as is; or 1. The Planning Board should refer to their consultant's (AKRF) final review and to the latest revised Traffic Study to determine if the Traffic Study answered all their concerns to Board's satisfaction. (b) Accept after answering the following questions to the Board's satisfaction: 1. Figure 10 - assignment of site generated traffic numbers do not match. Based on the figures there are 100 trips into the site and 104 leaving? Please clarify. (c) Reject as unsatisfactory Sfatf Report Seven Eleven PA ? Parking spaces closest to Factory Ave entrance - options ? Facts: Parking required: 27 @ 1/per 100sf (2,670sf) Parking proposed: 26 (including 1 ADA compliant) (a) Remove one parking space closest to the entrance of Factory Ave to improve circulation safety (leaving 25 parking spaces) 1. Replace with landscaping and potentially widening the entrance more for safety 2. Requires a waiver of two required parking spaces 3. Consider land banking the parking space to be removed 4. Requires a revision of the % landscape cover & landscape plan; or (b) Approve the plan with parking as shown (26 spaces) 1. Requires a waiver of one required parking space ? Notations on plan - corrections/changes (a) Move the employee parking designation to the two spaces closest to the dumpster. (b) Remove the compact car designation 1. This notation is no longer necessary - the aisle and parking stall dimensions now meet the minimum code requirement. (c) Revise the sign at the entrance into the site from Factory Ave. to read " No Delivery Trucks" instead of "No Trucks." ? Landscaping % coverage (a) The % coverage increased from 35.1 % to 35.21 % after the revision that widened the driveway. Verify that the 35.21 % is accurate. 1. The % provided is inclusive of the 249 s.f. dedication for the turning radius improvements (b) Approve site plan with at least 35.21 % landscape coverage (once verified) (c) Require revision of the % cover if parking space(s) are eliminated and replaced with landscaping. a Report Seven Eleven PaSO ? Landscaping plan details (a) The sanitary system approved by the Health Department will require excavation and removal of existing natural vegetation. Applicant should detail on the Landscape plan how it will be replanted (type, size and location of plants) and how the grease trap will be serviced. ? Front Landscape Requirement (25' wide) - options (a) Approve site plan as is; or (b) require the 25' be provided on-site; or (c) require a ZBA variance Note: For existing developed sites such. as this one, the Planning Board has not always required the full 25' wide front landscaped area. In this case, the Planning Board may approve the site plan as shown based on the following: 1. The subject parcel is an existing developed site with minimal existing landscaping, and as a result of this application, considerably more landscaping will be added. 2. The applicant has proposed areas of front landscaping that are wider than 25' where feasible, with a landscape strip that varies throughout the site from 44 feet along the east property line to 8 feet along the Main Road. 3. The average width of the front landscaped area = 24.37 ft. 4. It should be noted that the above average would change to 26.7 ft. if the Board agrees with the staff recommendation to remove a parking stall along Factory Ave and replace it with landscaping. 5. Substantial additional landscaping within the r.o.w. of Rt 25 is proposed - an average of 13 feet in width 6. Based on aerial photographs of the surrounding properties, the subject parcel will have far more front landscaped area than the others. ? Cross access - options (a) Approve site plan with provision showing future cross-access; or (b) Approve site plan with condition that a cross-access be provided now; or (c) Approve site plan with no reference to cross-access Of Repon Seven Eleven Pago ? NYSDOT Highway Work Permit - options (a) Approve prior to the work permit being issued after receiving a letter from NYS DOT stating they have no objections to site plan approval being granted now. 1. They have approved the site design, but are not quite ready to approve the permit pending some technical issues being resolved that will not affect the site layout; or (b) Wait for highway work permit to be issued before issuing approval 1. This option does not seem necessary for this application if the above-referenced letter is received by the Planning Board. Page 1 of 3 4 • • Winser, Kristy From: Betsy Perkins [mooreattys@yahoo.comj Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 2:43 PM To: Winser, Kristy Cc: Kalin, Carol Subject: Re: Hi; can you email me the 1/27/10 letter you refer to? I believe it was before we were retained. Please give Pat a call to discuss. thanks. Betsy Perkins LA Law Offices of William D. Moore; tel # 631 765 4663 Patricia C. Moore; tel # 631 765-4330 fax # for both; 631 765 4643 NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the use of the named recipient only. It may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, by using your reply button to advise us of such error. Thank you. From: "Winser, Kristy" <kristy.winser@town.southold.ny.us> To: Betsy Perkins <mooreattys@yahoo.com> Cc: Mark Wolfgang (E-mail) <mwolfgang@dot.state.ny.us>; Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail) <SIDOR@optonline.net>; "Lanza, Heather" <heather. lanza@town.southold. ny.us> Sent: Wed, March 31, 2010 2:20:09 PM Subject: RE: Betsy; There has been process in each case and we are moving forward as planned. We had in-house scoping meetings on each application last week as well as were discussed during the Transportation Commission meeting 4/15/2010 • • Page 2 of 3 held on Monday. For 7-11, the Transportation Committee will also be reviewing the traffic study and I'm waiting for their comments. Also, it should be noted that your approval from the Health Dept. for 7-11 is important for us to review as this may affect the site plan and design elements ( overall landscaping ect..). I also wanted to give you a heads that the DOT responded to an inquiry the Planning Board had regarding "no right hand turns on red" from Main Road @ the factory avenue intersection whereas the Transportation Commission concurred on this restriction. This issue should be addressed on your next submission to the DOT using case number 01-099P. As for Valero, I will need a floor plan to be submitted in conformance with the new legislation of the 800 sq. feet. I had advised Pat to meet with Mike Verity on this (also noted in my letter dated 1/27/10). Has this been done? I will inform you of when these applications will be ready to be scheduled for a work session. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy.Winser@t_o_wn.s_outhold..ny us -----Original Message----- From: Betsy Perkins [mailto:mooreattys@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 11:54 AM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: Hi; Can you give me the status of Valero & Gama (Mattituck 7-11)? Thanks, Betsy Perkins LA Law Offices of William D. Moore; tel # 631 765 4663 Patricia C. Moore; tel # 631 765-4330 fax # for both; 631 765 4643 NOTICE: The information contained in this a-mail is intended for the use of the named 4/15/2010 J • • Page 3 of 3 recipient only. It may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, by using your reply button to advise us of such error. Thank you. 4/15/2010 PROJECT SCOPING PLANNING APPLICATIONS Friday, March 26, 2010 2:30pm Protect name: Seven Eleven SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Location: We corner of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to one use for retail (convenience store) and add a 685 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635sq.ft. building on a 24,829 sq.ft. parcel in the Business Zone located SCTM# Status: New site plan Action: Review comments from the Public Hearing and staff report with the Planning Board. Attachments. Staff report packet TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: Jz_/ / / D 7 Site Plan Name: very Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- 1y2_ - / a 7 Other SCTM #s: /ooo - /,L/2- Street Address: ~/9 S ,egu -22-> Hamlet: /tjC~H r !z, c IC Distance to nearest intersection: -fir c fvr W 10a Type of Site Plan: New Amended Residential If Amended, last approval date: SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and hone number or the people below: Property Owner l~c+rna JPde? 'uc el, 6,9?- kP Z Street 3G4. A,61-M 6/oa d' aN oR D 6 7 City ~y State /V- Y Zip w`~ Home Telephone 513--0155 Other eKk 33 3 Applicant Street City State Zip Home Telephone Other Applicant's Agent or Representative: Contact Person(sY' I cc 1~ cr a 1? 5 y Street S/oZ n /W C4 /A? ~~OGC/ City &)a,71140101 State / Zip ///f7/ Office Telephone 74 f L13 3 o Other *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 1 of 2 10/05/05 SECTION C: Site Data Proposed construction type: New X Modification of Existing Structure -Agricultural Change of use Property total acreage or square footage: a'fL/YO_acdsq. ft. Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: /aya ac./sq. ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes - No X If yes, explain: ~s z Property Zoning District(s): i ? J S 617 Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 02 / 1-~2/ 0q Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes No X If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: ms's Slc7t fia/1 k/" /p190 itb cyc 2-9as~ov 61ctS ea /I (1111j c~ vei4ence List all proposed property uses: 1~,7nvenjl-nce Staff Other accessory uses: over`s e: (u ao/7 Existing lot c g f % Proposed lot coverage: / / Gross floor area of existing structure(s): c/brS~ sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): 68 S Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: -w2 # of proposed spaces: 3 Loading Berth: Yes_ No Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: Proposed landscape coverage: 2(0 % Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500" of a wetland area? Yes No If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certify that all the "e information is true. Signature ofPreparer: l - Date: Page 2 of 2 10/05/05 APPUCANPS AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOOIK ( c}Zr~ being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at 70 7Te~e L/o ~c~ In the State of New York, and that he Is the owner of the above property, or that he is the of the Dew?- rrltle) J (Specify whether Partnership or corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the tide to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been dearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly flied plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the J plans Planning submitted, and that the actual ophysicall Improvements will be Installed In strict accordance With the plans submitted. Signed rS Signed (Partner or corporate officer and Title) Sw to me this, , Z I day of t l 9 otary Public) SM A PE910N9 alfty P.W' 909 of NWAMA N0. 01PE 6130699 atemw in&AUN Cants '}~rl Cp An Eg*o AZ 191~.~ 07/01/2008 17:59 151690*9 GAZ REALTY INC PAGE 01/01 Gamma properties-Deer Park, Inc 320 Frost Pond Road Old Brookville, New York Ph: 516 593 0955 ext 33 Fax 516 908 4999 Emailgeorge,abizeid@gazrealty.com July 01, 2008 To Whom It May Concern Sub: 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, Southold, SCTM#1000-142-1-27 This letter is to confirm that we authorize Ms. Patricia C. Moore, Attorney at Law, 51020 Main Road, Southold, New York -11971 to acct as our agent, submit the required applications to the various departments of the Town Of Southold, Board of Health, and Department Of Transportation. In addition, we authorize Vivian Kamath, DSC Construction Corp.640 Sunrise Hwy, and West Babylon, NY 11704 to coordinate the process and represent us in the various departments as related to the above project. Thank you for your help and cooperation on this matter Sincerely George Abi Zeid, President End 677.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION To be completed b Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJECT LOCATION: A,2,i ~QOGC, C {fl-. /qp n-. ('~U Municipality County ~J r/ C-- 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) lo c>r?-/L/ ~~-ate 5. PROPOSED ACTION IS ? New ? Expansion Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: , /'c.~~m/Y'v~c_ /~`;e~Lgj'~'/a5~/s fcvnl~• _ /tiC>'Zt/n l~as s~fioyl u~L/ce~~~riS ~Ur~jf ~ /?/d4 C2 nC/ L?C~c( ~'~J~ 'y/ fir' Y ay !q'IiY~~i GL2! ~ ~d74/ ~Ve PJ~ O 7. AMOUNT OF / DVAFFECTED Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. WILLIX PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? Yes ? No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? - EIResidential ? Industrial Commercial Agriculture Park/Fbrest/Open Space Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANYPpTHER GOVERNMENTI}L AGENCY (FEDE , STATE OR LOCAL)? 11 es E]No If Yes, list agency(s) name and pennittapprovals: /(/t/S,voT - 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF T_H E ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yes I ~J ' If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit/approvals 12. AS A RESULT OF PROP ED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ? Yes No I CERTIFY THAT. E INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGEp p Applicant/sponsor name; Dale: Signature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT To be completed b Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.4? If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. El Yes E]No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.6? If No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. Yes ? No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic pattern, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly: C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly: C6. Longterm, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl-C5? Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA (CEA)? ? Yes n No If Yes, explain briefly: E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? Yes ? No If Yes, explain briefly: PART III - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question D of Part II was checked yes, the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination Name o Lead Agency Date Print or Type ame o Responsi le -Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature o Preparer (I different from responsible o ecer) low • • Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 AGENT: Patricia C. Moore Esq., 51020 Main Road, Soutold NY 11971 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ? Planning Dept. X Building Dept. ? Board of Trustees ? Zoning Board of Appeals 1 Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ? (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) ? (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: ? Type: Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form l 0 • Nature and extent of action: existing gas station with three garage bays, gas canopy and accessory conveninence store replaced with one retail use (7-11 convenience store) site plan Location of action: 9945 Rt.25, Mattituck Site acreage: 24,140 sq.ft. Present land use: existing gas station with three garage bays, gas canopy and accessory conveninence store replaced with one retail use (7-11 convenience store) Present zoning classification: Business 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Gama Deer Park, Inc (b) Mailing address: c/o GAZ Realty Inc. 366 North Broadway, Suite 206 Jericho. NY 11753 (c) Telephone number: (516 ) 513-0155 Ext 333 (d) Application number, if any: _ Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ? No X If yes, which state or federal agency: DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use ofa coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ? Not Applicable Discussion (if appropriate): Existing building uses will be reduced to one conforming retail busiess use Existing property is fully developed and proposed addition to front of existing structure is required because the existing garage structure has no storage space (on slab) Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of'Southold. See LWRP Section 111- Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Town of Southold LWRP 2 Consistency Assessment Form • • Discussion (if appropriate): _ Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section 111- Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): the gas station with canopy will be eliminated and a single use retail business is proposed NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section 111- Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): gas station is eliminated- hazardous materials will no longer be sold from this site Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): since a potentially hazardous material site (gas station) will be eliminated, risk to wildlife is eliminated Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III - Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): gas station repplaced with a retail use (7-11) Town of Southold LWRP 3 Consistency Assessment Form • • Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): proposed 7-11 does not create grater solid waste then other retail uses PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 4 Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): Gas station supplies use of energy and mineral resources, retail has no impact on energy or mineral resources. *copy of Town form created on 2/11/06 Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 5 E e WHffEttME ENGINEEMNO pCV .Ew 7-E MC. Nn NN cwE¢ vuPP~EE vwr¢ o i~u r 'I 11•••'•~•I M.,m I 22 ' ~ ® ® L7 BB • M • a~ a MFE BM i 7•-O• 4r- w N RA au LAYOUT INFORMATION 0. D6CRIPTON QTY Nn' xo7 4._ ROLLER GRILLS 2 o a °D SANDWICH CASE CIO EXT VAULT DOORS 10 o LOW TEMP DOORS 3 -I ICE MERCHANDISER 1 NOVELT CCASE 0 p cas rrE BAKERYCASES 2 n I SLURPEE BARRELS 6 - m rA-] FULL HOT FOODS YES n Nna PARTIAL HOT FOODS NORTHEAST GONDOLA T-UNITS 25 ma1oN 10 . -0' END CAPS 3 ai HIGHWALLS 2 n TOTAL= 31 I TOTAL SOFT 2fi70 SEWNG FLOOR SO FT 1785 IA411F °~re L®116 CIORE NJ UVRJVEO H/: ' NA" MIYM N7: SNFE! NP FLOOR PLAN E SC: NTS 1 Cf C CNCEiC M. CHAR SM Y / / / my xn my o m.-.. ` MdG M'RMRT ~ ZONE: GENERM1 BUSINESS (B) p " Z / / N~iouo uy ,v= USE: W LOBAUM S SHOPPING CENTER I ~ ~ W 0%S~f / lY~f Nb'S]30 E 7600 ~i K .a V' ~ w ~ ~ ~ vmEm uvoan Aa J m auxx ne' ;.f ~ va-alum Nlr7 1~ r , ~ Yr xa-s <u m. ruw 1 . ,r tea) , n' anNly lnq >T _ PROPOSED r' r' va. a no nASx \ ~ M1~ (MR014 d [ML rIY ~ .R ' CONVENIENCE STORE i rr I (32,667 SF) L__-1 slr UO ~w At ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) - 0 i (N RNW am HAmxkD) USE RETAIL o Qx~a k \ - PROP. 3682 SF EXPANSION opF , r o - r ~ i~ l I NO PARKING , I° O r , 0 0 0 0 0 0 f y OS YID' Y Y f ZGN r1pA 9]I f pp~- I xa IY C n• 1 PIP. USE g IY. _ ` na vn.~ Imcnru % ' C Irn.l - rvoloa aws r¢m n ream n O g a IM a salmon Aro x~. mursw w e / k p, vIL uo vaaeG nul uaYUnBB m / ,i • mwaNU>m mx vvovmrt PYM6 / S S NI f y Rn I . € a' . i "~[cT~ ra.'r~ILml' I 0 ^4>y o mx ° r i I a~« O O O O 8. I mow _ _198.00' low n up~ BOHLER ;r ? ! PROPOSED e.v r: • en¢a 'o ; _ 1 L ON YAP / • ~ ~ ~.IIIJ v / U. ° CONVENIENCE STORE r VL Tv~ se xiu vxess w _ d O 5. (*2.667 SPA0 REFERENCES PROP. FOOS SF E%PANRION ~d.ye / asf / ~ ? aa. r ~~r P 1 A ~,A S' ` 1 1 ZONING DATA V x p r r z mr vo< a rtn xew. ~C? / O 1, o t: i it n qqxO iWOxt O COINER APPWCANT INFORMATION S © °vm -BUM REQUIREMENTS -m i ~f EOHLER r v r / ~ _ OIN.{ 4 NI 5ru t, PARKING REQUIREMENTS r» p b . " ~ wm Re o,wr r - 0 s T.1F[LAZZOLA w. , ? O 1 • /,i SIONA E REQUIREMENTS cur x r ".o ? NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION r. L w.w v.......; . -.vmn ..vs.n rn ' FREESTANDING SIGNS... r _ ? p~ INC 7-ELEVEN, , rww i MAIN ROAD CONCEPT ° .w.am PLAN "A" ~ as - .,..w.,",.. w... p.......~".. ecAle s...,.. w.a..,. s.....- MTMMW COMPARISON OF THE EXISTING TRAFFIC PATTERN TO PROPOSED USE The proposed use of a convenience store is a permitted use in Business Zoning. No variances will be required and a site plan application is pending. The applicant has proposed the elimination of the gas station. A gas station is a use which is permitted only by Special Exception of the Zoning Board of Appeals. As a Special Exception use, a gas station may be located only upon a showing by the property owner that the gas station will comply with enumerated standards and the Zoning Board may impose reasonable conditions. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The subject property contains a gas service station in a 30 foot by 66 foot brick building with three repair garage bays, an office area, and small convenience store. The gas station was first approved by the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals January 2, 1969 (Appeal #1225). In addition to the service area, centered on the property, are two gas pump islands with eight fueling stations parallel to the Main Road (Rt. 25) and an enclosed cash booth. The pump stations are roofed over with a 30 foot by 103 foot lit canopy. Along Rt 25 there are two curb cuts which permit both ingress and egress. One of the two access points onto Rt 25 is located only 20 feet from the intersection of Factory Avenue and Main Road. A third access from the property is located on Factory Avenue. The access onto Factory Avenue is also only 20 feet from the intersection from Factory Avenue & Rt. 25. These access points allow left turn & right turn movements into and out of the site. The existing property has a small landscaped area at the corner of Factory Avenue and Main Road and hedges along the easterly property line. The property is surrounded by a multi-tenant shopping center. A row of mature trees behind the building along the north property line screens the rear of the property from the sea of blacktop at the shopping center. Minimal landscaping is provided on the State Highway right-of-way. The gas station has no marked or designated parking areas, however, historically cars park along the east and west side of the building. Gasoline Tanker Trucks deliver regularly to the site. Existing access points have been used since 1969. There appears to be drainage for the existing conditions, except that drainage enters the State Highway and Factory Avenue from the site. A copy of the existing conditions survey is attached herein as Exhibit A. The existing gas station was approved by the Zoning Board which granted a special exception permit in 1969. In 1969 the law provided that the Zoning Board incorporated site plan elements as part of the Special Exception review. In 1991 the Zoning Board approved an accessory convenience store for the gas station in the place of the three repair bays. Finally, in 1995 variances were granted for an accessory gasoline canopy. The building inspect6rissued building perriiit7 for these accessory uses without formal site plan approval. The proposed change of use has triggered site plan review from the Planning Board. I REDEVELOPMENT OF SITE: As was considered by the Souhthold Transportation Commission, redevelopment of the site will enhance a substandard corner radius (Rt 25 and factory Avenue) and increase landscaping to a scenic byway. The redevelopment of the site will give the Town of Southold an opportunity to review and approve a site plan to an existing developed property. The proposed alteration to the existing building for a single use convenience store will provide the following specific traffic improvements to the site: 1. The northeast corner of Factory Avenue and Rt 25, according to NYSDOT , is an existing substandard design. The existing traffic pattern for the existing gas station allows uncontrolled ingress and egress onto the site from three locations, two on Rt 25 and one from Factory Avenue. The two existing access points are less than 20 feet from the intersection of Rt 25 at Factory Avenue, and the radius on the northeast corner is sub-standard, which presents difficulties for westbound vehicles turning right on to Factory Avenue. The proposed site plan for the convenience store relocates the access on Factory Avenue away from the intersection of Factory Avenue & Rt 25. The proposed access on Factory Avenue provides controlled vehicle destination to the east under the protection of a traffic signal. The existing access on Rt 25, closest to the intersection, has been eliminated and sole access moved to the east. The sole access on Rt 25 is designed to allow right-turns only into and out of the site. In this manner, all left turns onto or off New York State Rt 25 generated by the site will take place under the protected phase (arrow) for eastbound left turns into Factory Avenue, and a left turn lane and separate phasing for southbound left turns from Factory Avenue. The NYSDOT has determined that the radius improvements will be a reasonable mitigation option at this location. The owner will be responsible for the site improvements and the cost for constructing the radius improvements. However, the State will undertake the cost of relocation of utility and pedestrian traffic control facilities. 2. The improvements to Rt 25 and Factory Avenue will require underground conduit for connection of signal equipment. This is an overall improvement to the community. 3. Existing conditions of the gas station allows site runoff to enter the State highway right-of- way. Drainage onto Rt 25 and Factory Avenue from the existing curb cuts impacts traffic. This will be addressed with the redevelopment of the site and be corrected. 4. The site improvements require sidewalks made of slip resistant textured surfaces. Pedestrian movement at the intersection will be improved with the redevelopment of the site. The improvements to the sidewalk and radius is particularly relevant given the ice cream store on the west side of Factory Avenue. Pedestrian movement will have the added protection of the controlled and directional ingress and egress from the this parcel onto Factory Avenue. The ice cream store operates from a preexisting nonconforming parcel with parking which reverses (backs up) onto Factory Avenue within feet of the intersection of Factory Avenue • and Rt 25. The relocation of the access points on the subject parcel as well as the directional markings for a left turn lane and separate phasing for southbound left turns from Factory Avenue mitigate the existing conditions at the ice cream store. These improvements are made possible by the proposed redevelopment of the site. 5. The existing gas station has no designated parking. Vehicles entering the site and either filling with gas or servicing vehicles have uncontrolled traffic circulation on the property. Gas tank location on vehicles vary and pulling up to the gas pump can often be a dance between vehicles. The retail use requires no special maneuvering. The proposed plan provides for directional signs and 23 marked parking stalls. While the zoning code only requires 14 parking spaces, 1 parking space per 200 sq.ft. of retail area, the parcel allows for additional parking. A floor plan has been provided which shows that one third of the interior space in the building is storage, office and two handicap bathrooms. The Mattituck site plan has been professionally engineered to meet current Town standards and 7-11 traffic circulation guidelines. 6. The proposed site plan shows future cross access to the adjacent parcel for future use, if possible. Cross access easements from the shopping center are in the sole control of the Town of Southold and must be accepted by the owner. The Mattituck Shopping Center has been the subject of site plan review, cross access easements have, to date, not been required by the Town. Comparison of other 7-11 stores within Town of Southold ( Plot plans attached as Exhibit 13- please note numbers shown on old site plans are difficult to read and may differ slightly): Mattituck 2009: 24,140 sq.ft. parcel, 2,670 sq.ft. store footprint, 11% lot coverage, 22 parking spaces are proposed, loading area shown, two curb cuts proposed, intersection improvements proposed.. Southold 1984: 17,950 sq.ft. parcel, store footprint 2,465 sq.ft., 13% lot coverage, 13 spaces provided. No loading area shown. It appears from the site plan that only one curb cut onto Locus Lane is shown but access onto Rt 25 exists. Approved by Planning Board. The approved Site plan does not conform to existing conditions- (this site plan may have been modified by NYSDOT which maintains jurisdiction of curb cuts on Rt 25). Cutchogue 1974: 20,117 sq.ft., store footprint 2,400 sq.ft., 12% lot coverage, 17 spaces provided. One curb cut onto Rt 25. Deliveries shown on east side of building, Uproved by Planning Bo Greenport 1985: 23,860 sq.ft., store footprint 2,684 sq.ft., 11% lot coverage, 16 parking spaces provided. One curb cut onto Rt 25, loading area provided along front door, agpproved by Planning Board. The proposed Mattituck site is the largest property and the building is comparable in size to the other 7-11 stores in Southold Town. The Mattituck site provides the most parking, and has the most access points to provide for better vehicle circulation in and onto the property. The Mattituck site is also asked to make improvements to the corner of Rt 25 and Factory Avenue which benefit the community. The change of use provides an opportunity for the Planning Board to improve the site which would not otherwise be required by an existing business. The applicant has agreed to make a significant investment to the site and improve the existing conditions of the property. The proposed 7-11 Store is a beneficial use of the property which should have the Town's support and approval. Prepared by Patricia C. Moore Esq. April 6, 2009 EXHIBIT -A I 1 %15.16 %,0.E] I,. x126 x15.20 Y. t ' ~ ~p L x wo P7 Iaa,,7 6 X,7,66 BF ic'U1,' %I]d6 %Il.ft x14.41 x,0.02 ~~'`ii I~ LyEI~}.3] '~fi7. RhP!' !5 ASPHALT P .1 R N I N 6 N/P / 21151 ^^1lY~RAAT~II" icr 10! L,\'(.26+>) SS~S F } ~1~• E', 15f i 46.00 IY~y YM?NIX PL/J,li Ll0 r~ 77Wtl4 y211~,~yy x 1~.~ OW'19LD0 w~ AA 1qN . ' -t~IFE ' 7x' _p % fir. a~•'Ud - r ~ (~'Y ~~~.~ylli70 : ~xm;002 ,ANA nlbi5:y75R p~@ pR ix• ulec ~qY 27M -6C xc' 4 4 A 'T ' a,R U S H WL WBE Fi R 16.16 l ,v AQ a 4,EDQ .'i6 .HAIL ,xtEA 11 7A1 244! ~ 'R°~v t, 1 'env i¢p"I VI YS66~R oa' ` I A1U~ x+~o a 4 4~1.q~15~46~ ~ 75.11 , "AlL M~" x 11LO x 14.46 few 11 , m y Epp yt%r EL 2G>5 row dYFa iE~ TRH 6qy ~p g~~y {G )hal4p yW gp rn hgrr t I~ '~`W!, u;".aL .21:V0 tl~, SEuR,' ~ I', • p6 7.R~M1 I 9USV.. , .I h, G 61 A5 PH ALT PANN 1ND P' I I' ,1. I„ dh y 11 ~r~E ' ` '~'``~y !77 pl•' g62J'M" . .~_.6.p.,.y-1,~,~cL 1665 2&76 ~s~4q A57 p,~gtlly.L% q N~ A a R.H A L T I T W~6M!1 I 0. 2a~ 75 :5 2F ) N9 nl 7rEk R6NEA `,I k~ Il4•7] I I '.4q' Y 45 - I \ ; , fMPEB x 2"7 N'6fA1k6,.. t :I?'PL9Me] `Y-~*'-` 4'14)x!2 g0co"~5~ 2L 1e 'ii XX4,V I I 6 k, I ca P I ASPHALT 1F f! mMot 9 :.1 '''~~'AV f4pa ARY • ~p Y'2mm %2651 7} ~1 f •F ¢ , ..,2 I ,~p24WY 4LllT 1FFA I'. 24WY +I 1a,a's% sL 2a1,6t I 5626 I 5a 4 R9i13daE: Tc 20.+0 re /0m "~',,i`I APR -7 2009 EL 26m-'".r D WALL 90 l rm 1* a4 I t~ 4 low VVE TQ 4 ps"'~' f~ 25Y12 M . i, 101 CO$N, 1C 41.01 m 14.24 N 6RQ#,5 W' `'I ~y •M ,1 !11 APRW } T 691,. 4yPM6I1ea~yVN6{{IImgmg1;1; yp: iLX3'.!1 ppIy~~ ~yy~ ' 11. y 1 i A s lki L, L1 20.57 At) 1 Y } .1 ~i, 1 ~yyy 4y f~q"!^ u.r~ .•y.y +,+nr '!"bM1°..wwM 1 '~t~ v 'a' C[y;(Lr..',' lv tlN~ tl {',Y4.F 4 A M.k PMR +wR., AREA,. 24,140.48 sq ft • . C1.~~51 0 ~a ~€'1~ t R66,AjryL6q.i 1u+piY6dsr P"n ~a*` 1 s. - C6tJC~plxa ~ Yt teWy'i ¦IIOMWNFM', .>nA N M,'S. l;ic. Nv. b4$65~ . i YNQ OF NE 71 c MAP MAID OF LAND WCATE© AT t ? ~ 1 MATTITUCK a'. c~~ o 3 fl 6 m r ~dr~'a ,r TOWN OF TOWN O SOUTW'N0M COUNTY OF Sk~'FF06K ¢ o STATE OF NEW YORK AN P v e F T. ate yrr s, QC 1f - - - - - - - ^ - - oT EXHIBIT -B MA/y ROAD L 2 M ,oww w ~~°s rte.""n ~ r_ wrt o ~ Z 44 ja I~' ~i~ 4 ry o^ O '50 oo, J 63." W" W css_-aaa~•• i ° O CORR.. i I i -401 d f P fl y F IL. z v „ r~ "MAR hx JTATE {p[`' per+ _r L E G E N D ra x a. re Po ~ •o rxr/gr, .utp ~ iRE[ ~ ~J ENW6! k m 41, y6~"~/ y[~1. ~ ~-s ~ p ~~[f. •s~ ~ . ~i f ~yy Alp W r..y~~v(~~ / /NY} x/~ 111166RF1[EC ~y[d k.. r / wjO ESTIMATE CF I N ym .uw[~ r • ~ R Xy : AINAGE CRI ERIA ..•rr~ ~UM l 4MCITY ppry~lgEy q{ p~ GRKITY GRMI® cµ rvw[ . ~ ° I i 4 °m s Yvmc wwrw MYROVFD YY j. ~ ..a wWM [o4o rl. ~ ~ cwaner~r ss"'ir's.r [oWxwfwMan I i IL 'As o?'" f [ ~DO°`,. o --*00 SEWAG~E~ CRITERIA~ s ~ . ~ "ux oagy tittl 1-1 5EM ~rx3.^W i y. nvs .rns i . TOWN OROUTHOLD PLANNING AARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: -1-/ 8 1-6r- Site Plan Name: 7_ a rv&-Ai Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- P/2 _ / a7 Other SCTM #s: Street Address: 49 ifs' ~f a S Distance to nearest intersection: Hamlet: M.'} rr, 77JCr- Type of Site Plan: Y New Amended If Amended, last approval date: Residential SECTION B, Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and hone number or the people below. Property Owner 6606 Ift-OL ipwp-K w Street 4 G~Z i :r,. din G N~ "M City ~ P r~ G a State /vy -Zip / 3 Home Tele honeJ2l Hcf 333 P (o' 513 ^ 0/,55- Other. Applicant i i' Street - 0 °008 1 city State Zrp Home Telephone Other + , Applicant's Agent or Representative: Contact Person(s)* I 44?2-Gc d (f lVoole Street CS /OZO mj2 rn Ro t City VOw-owko/o State NY Zip 1/ f Office Telephone_ 31- 7~ r- 3 50 Other 76S q6, /3 *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. 05105 Page I of 2 JON C: Site Data toposed construction type: #NeW Modification of Existing ~tnicture -Agricultural Change of use Property total acreage or square footage:.Z'/,8__Z_ac./sq. ft. y 2,700 ex~sfzfq/~,n~axd addcfza?~ Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: ac./sq. f4. / Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes No X_ If yes, explain: Property Zoning District(s): (3u6 ; MOSS Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 9 / L) / 08 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes X No _ If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No _ If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. (xwaroed) Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. 6a List all existing property uses: GCS S-(rAhon We c3 !`9ffLr g s~ Q U.r Corwen(c~cv 5~d. List all proposed property uses: re - 7-// c-n yt n ce c.0 ik&9 Cl u u Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: 10 % Proposed lot coverage: / / % Gross floor area of existing structure(s): ISO sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): 2-700 Parking Space Data: ' / # of existing spaces: Y 101MO424) # of proposed spaces: o? 3 Loading Berth: Yes X No Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coveraf /4 Z % Proposed landscape coverage: y/ % Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500" of a wetland area? Yes No X_ If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certify that 11 thhe ab ve information is true. Signature of Preparer: Date: 9 d,Q F Page 2 of 2 l0/05/05 07/01/2008 17:59 15169080 GAZ REALTY INC • PAGE 01/01 Gamma Properties-Deer Park, Inc 320 Frost Pond Road Old Brookville, New York Ph: 516 513 0155 ext 33 Fax 516 908 4999 Emailgeorge,abizeid@gazrealty.com July 01, 2008 To Whom It May Concern Sub: 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, Southold, SCTM#1000-142-1-27 This letter is to confirm that we authorize Ms. Patricia C. Moore, Attorney at Law, 51020 Main Road, Southold, New York -11971 to act as our agent, submit the required applications to the various departments of the Town Of Southold, Board of Health, and Department Of Transportation. In addition, we authorize Vivian Kamath, DSC Construction Corp.640 Sunrise Hwy, and West Babylon, NY 11704 to coordinate the process and represent us in the various departments as related to the above project. Thank you for your help and cooperation on this matter Sincerely. George Abi Zeid, President End , ~ ~ era FORM NO. 3 Y NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 29, 2008 AMENDED: Au¢ust 12, 2008 W eU~ ~ ~ TO: Patricia C. Moore (GAMA Properties) 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated July 8, 2008 SC=r' _ " a 1 For permit to make additions and alterations, converting an existing gas station and convenience store to a convenience at Location of property: 9945 Route 25. Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 142 Block 1 Lot 27 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this 24,829 square foot parcel in the B District is not permitted pursuant to Article XI Section 280-49, which states; "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule allows a minimum single side yard setback of 25 feet and a minimum rear yard setback of 35 feet. Following the proposed construction the building will maintain an existing side yard setback of 21.67 feet, and a rear yard setback of 24.16 feet. In addition, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XI, 280-50, A., which states, "Structures shall be set back at least 100 feet from the ri ght-of-wad Also, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XI Section 280-50, C. which states; "A protect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than 60 linear feet of frontage on one street." Following the proposed construction, the building will have +/-90 feet of frontage on Main Road. The proposed use requires site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. Phis Notice of Disapproval was written based on a site plan dated 6/27/8 by Kempey Engineering and amended on August 12, 2008, to correct errors. Aut prized i ature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A., PLANNING r.up. Jv. LVVV It.V I. r.r rv..--r.. N r.v vr. ..vri VOLLMUTH • BRUSH Planning, Environmental Engineering & Land Surveying 200 BLUE POINT AVENUE TEL 631-363-2683.212-775.0988 BLUE PoiNT, NEW YORK 11715-1204 FAx 631-363-2062 • vou,BRVSNSOIw August 30, 2008 Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Building Setbacks SCTM # District 1000, Section 142, Block 1, Lot 26 Mattituck Shopping Center Dear Ms. Moore, As requested, on August 27, 2008 a Vollmuth & Brush Field Crew visited the above referenced site and measured the existing building setbacks to their respective adjacent road lines. Measurements were taken from the closest building corners to the road lines of Factory Avenue and NYS Route 25 and the results are as follows: Closest Building Offset to NYS Route 25 34.90 feet Closest Building Offset to Factory Avenue 24.80 feet If you should require any additional information please contact me. ~pF N~yy Vol uth & Brush 10O d Cr or T. Brush P.L.S. 495 N icense 9 49697 LANDS PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries September 8, 2008 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Southold Town Planning Board Mrs. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: GAMA Deer Park, Inc (Mattituck 7-11) 1000-142-1-27 Dear Chairpersons and Board members: The owner wishes to withdraw the previous application for accessory car wash and submit the enclosed application to construct addition to the existing building. This application will convert existing garage structure, accessory convenience store and three repair bays to the one retail use. The gas dispensing island and canopy will be removed. The existing uses on the property will be reduced to one retail use (7-11 convenience store). Enclosed please find an application for site plan and an application - for variances required to expand existing building for the above referenced property. Please place this matter on the calender at the earliest possible date. Ve ru yours, atricia Cy Moore P m CC: LAMA Deer Park, Inc... TC'1l OF S +10LD P601AIRTY IMC_ORID CARD q2 . _ J VILLAGE SUB. LOT ER I R NAAsar,IA76a BAST E GoYF. s ACR.~ ~jSSoeIA7a-o4 Sj ltri"(0 TYPE {)F BUILDING ~ _ W - D" SEA VL. FARM COMM CB., MICR. vglus..... REAAARICS 'L IMP. TOTAL _ ,ATE f ~.t .~Np r ' 1 GCJG ~ r a 0-1 - ~ _ :mrrl aamw 5 5 4b` - .3 BUILDING CONDITION L~~ AGE NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FARM Acre Value Per Value 4 / Acre FRONTAGE ON WATER Woodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD f )7f sr F2 ( DEPTH.. Mad'owlond L BULKHEAD I TRIM to i J .COLOR I F 1 -J =F71 ._T---j . M. Bldg. { =t n - i i t) i . 7 J (',Zb°r - - - I Extension ` t - - - Extension- i _ - Extension irseite - • Foundation Both Basement Floors.... EJ•rwitiy K, porch 'YL6 t Ext. Wells Iriterfo`Finfsh_ _ 3 e e Y0 ` Parch LR. - y,c L Breezeway Fire Place Heat DR. _ Type Roof Rdoms rat Floor BR' Garage Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. 0 Patio 0. B. Dormer Drivewdy S _ Total I > i i FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 29, 2008 AMENDED: August 12, 2008 AMEDNED: September 4, 2008 TO: Patricia C. Moore (GAMA Properties) 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated 3uly 8, 2008 For permit to make additions and alterations converting an existing gas station and convenience store to a convenience store at Location of property: 9945 Route 25, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 142 Block 1 Lot 27 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this 24,829 square foot parcel in the B District is not permitted pursuanr to Article X1 Section 280-49 which states; "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parkin and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference with the same force and effect as if such re uulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule allows a minimum single side yard setback of 25 feet, and a minimum rear yard setback of 35 feet Following the proposed construction the building will maintain an existing side yard setback of 21.67 feet, and a rear yard setback of 24.16 feet. Also, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XI Section 280-50 C which states: "A.proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than 60 linear feet of frontage on one street." Following theklru osed construction, the building will have +/-90 feet of frontage on Main Road. The proposed use recyuh cs site ,ian approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. This Notice of Disapproval was written based on a site plan dated 6/27/8 by Kempey Engineering and amended on.Au ust_12, 2008, to correct errors. This notice was further amended on September 4, 2008, to removed the need for a variance under Article XI, 280-50 A. based on Article Xl, d3,,e6certilication of adjacent setbacks, dated August 30, 2008, by George Brush, LS. ~ J 1 ature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by me Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A., PLANNING Aug.30. 2003 12:01PM 16- MUTH & BRUSH • No. 6879 P. 2 VOLLMUTH & BRUSH Planning, E vironmenta1 Engineering & Land Surveying 200 BLUF. POINT AVENUE T8L 631-363-2683 .212-775-0988 BLUE PO W' New YQR 11715-1204 FAX 631-363-2062 - v n LerzusH.w.i August 30, 2008 Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Building Setbacks SCTM # District 1000, Section 142, Block 1, Lot 26 Mattituck Shopping Center Dear Ms. Moore, As requested, on August 27, 2008 a Volimuth & Brush Field Crew visited the above referenced site and measured the existing building setbacks to their respective adjacent road lines. Measurements were taken from the closest building comers to the road lines of Factory Avenue and NYS Route 25 and the results are as follows: Closest Building Offset to NYS Route 25 34.90 feet Closest Building Offset to Factory Avenue 24.80 feet If you should require any additional information please contact me. Of N~ly Vol uth & Brush ~Cpe G or T. Brush P.L.S. o, 49ge4 N lcense # 49697 ERNDr~ • • APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS E$:11: By: Date Assigned/Assignment No. House No. 9945 Street Route 25 Hamlet Mattituck CTM 1000 Section 142 Block 01 Lot(s) 27 Lot Size 24,829 Zone B District I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED July 29, 2008, last amended September 4, 2008 BASED ON MAP DATED-6-27-08 Applicant(s)/Owner(s): Gama Deer Park, Inc Mailing Address: c/o GAZ Realty, Inc., 366 North Bmodwav, Suite 206 Jericho. New York 11753 Telephone: 516-513-0155 Ext 333 Fax Email: NOTE: In addition to the above, please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: Patricia C. Moore Esq. for ( X) Owner, or ( ) Other: Agent's Address: 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 11971 Telephone 631-7654330 Fax 765-4643 Email: pcmooorel6i~optonline.net Please check box to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above names: 0 Applicant/Owner(s), or H Authorized Representative, or 0 Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED MAP DATED June 27, 2008 and plans dated June 13.2007 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED July 8, 2208 FOR: E Building Permit 0 Certificate of Occupancy 0 Pre-Certificate of Occupancy 0 Change of Use 0 Permit for As-Built Construction 0 Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.) Article XI Section 280-50 Subsection C Article X Section 280-49 Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: E A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. 0 A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. 0 Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section 0 Reversal or Other A prior appeal E has , has not been made at any time with respect to this property, UNDER Appeal No. 4290-Year-1-4-95_(Canopy)_. 3788 1-11-91 (Accessory Convenience stare to Gas Station) 1225 12-12-68 (Special Exc gas station) 5906 8-21-07 (open- 3 uses-car wash)-discontinued (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance.) Name of Owner: GAMA Properties ZBA File # • • REASONS FOR APPEAL (additional sheets maybe used with preparer's signature): AREA VARIANCE REASONS. (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: The property is a corner lot with 150 feet along Factory Avenue & 198 feet long Rt 25. Behind and adjacent to the parcel is the Mattituck Shopping Center parking Lot. No vehicular access is proposed between the subject parcel and the Mattituck Shopping Center. The existing parcel contains a gas station which was granted from the ZBA a special exception in 1969 and has continued to operate as a gas station with a three bay repair garage. In 1990 the ZBA granted approval to operate a convenience store, as accessory to the existing gas station. The gas station and repair garage bays remain and the convenience store was permitted by Board action. In 1995 the canopy was added to the gas station, this canopy will also be removed for the single use convenience store. Therefore, at present, the property contains a full gasoline service station, three bays for car repair, a convenience store, and a canopy. The proposed application will no longer operate the gas station or the three bay repair garage, the activity at this site will be significantly reduced to one retail use ( a stand alone 7- 11 convenience store). Retail convenience store is a permitted use in the Business zoning district. The proposed variance for rear yard setback is required because the existing building is nonconforming with respect to rear yard. The proposed addition to the existing building will continue the existing rear setback The property is surrounded by the Mattituck Shopping Center parking lot and the location of the building retains 21 feet around the rear of the property. The surrounding properties are all developed The addition to the existing building does not change the character of this business district. The variance from the 60 foot linear rule is misplaced at this parcel because the property is surrounded by the Mattituck Shopping Center building. The shopping center structure exceeds 60 linear feet (the Mattituck Shopping Center is close to 500 linear feet). The proposed improvements to the building will be in character with businesses in the area. The new CVS, across the street, has been improved and exceeds 60 feet in width. The expansion is required by the 7-11 to meet their operational needs. The building is narrow, only 30 feet in width, and the store must have adequate isle width, interior circulation and storage. (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: The existing building will be used as one retail use with a small expansion on the east side. The elimination of the gas station with a convenience store, repair garage, and canopy will be a significant reduction in the intensity of uses. The existing building needs to accommodate the proposed 7-11, the site plan shows extensive parking and traffic circulation. The existing building will not be expanded towards either of the roads. The additional 25 feet towards the easterly property line will not impact the adjacent parcel because it is a commercial parking lot with a grade difference which prevents access. The adjacent owner has refused a cross easement in the past. (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: The existing setbacks to the street are maintained. The only expansion is to the east which maintains a set back of 24 feet to the property line. The rear property line permits access to the back of the building. The parcel is surrounded by asphalt parking from Mattituck Shoping Center. The elimination of the garage and gas station, gas pumps, canopy and only one use for the premises is a significant reduction in the intensity of the commercial use of the property. This area of Mattituck has preexisting commercial parcels which should be encouraged to be improved. The removal of the canopy and three garage bays will be a significant improvement to the visual character of the Business District. The architectural improvements to the building will enhance the continued redevelopment of the Mattituck shopping center area. The proposed with of the building will be visually insignificant by the architectural features to the building and the juxtaposition of the surrounding 500 linear feet of the Mattituck Shopping Center in the back ground. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The property is fully developed, contains a gas station, canopy, permitted convenience store and repair bays. The redevelopment of the property has proposed road improvements which will benefit the Mattituck community and improve the general traffic now of the Mattituck Business District. (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? ( )Yes, or (X )No. The property is already developed and the setbacks of the existing building are established. The building is preexisting and exceeds the 60 foot rule. The modest expansion is reasonable and necessary for the reduction of uses to the building from an accessory convenience store to a stand alone convenience store. The lot has 199 linear feet of frontage on Route 25 and limiting the width of the building to 60 feet is not practical given the depth of the property and size of the existing building. Are there Covenants and Restrictions concerning this land: ? No. ? Yes (please furnish copy). This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Check this box ( ) IFA USE VARIANCE IS BEING REQUESTED, AND PLEASE COMPLETE THE ATTACHED • • USE VARIANCE SHEET. (Please be sure to consult your attoy ry.) i i S re of Appellant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Sworn before me this day o , , 20 C otary Publi - BETSY A PERKINS NCIWY Public. Stale of New Y0* No. 01 PE 6130636 WOW In Sutfdk Caaay Camiwim Egws J* t 07/01/2008 17:59 15169059 GAZ REALTY INC • PAGE 01/01 Gamma Properties-Deer Park, Inc 320 Frost Pond Road Old Brookville, New York Ph: 596 593 0955 ext 33 Fax 516 908 4999 Emailgeorge,abizeid@gazrealty.com July 01, 2008 To Whom It May Concern Sub: 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, Southold, SCTM#1000-142-1-27 This letter is to confirm that we authorize Ms. Patricia C. Moore, Attorney at Law, 51020 Main Road, Southold, New York -11971 to act as our agent, submit the required applications to the various departments of the Town Of Southold, Board of Heafth, and Department Of Transportation. In addition, we authorize Vivian Kamath, DSC Construction Corp.640 Sunrise Hwy, and West Babylon, NY 11704 to coordinate the process and represent us in the various departments as related to the above project. Thank you for your help and cooperation on this matter Sincerely. George Abi Zeid, President End QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION OWNER: GAMA Properties-Deer Park, Inc CTM: 1000-142-1-27 A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? ? Yes E No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? E No ? Yes, please explain on attached sheet. C. 1) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? No 2) Are these areas shown on the map submitted with this application? No 3) Is the property bulkheaded between the wetlands area and the upland building area? N/A 4) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved map. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? No E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? Yes- site plan of proposed does not show existing canopy (Please show area of these structures on a diagram if any exist. Or state "none" on the above line, if applicable.) F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? No If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department and describe: G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? No If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your map with this application. H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel as station with convenience store, canopv. 3 bays for repair earaee and proposed use one retail store ( 7-I1 convenience store) (exam fisting: single-family; proposed: same with garage or pool, or other description.) A / ized Signature and Date 2/05; 1/07 0 • APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For ZBA Reference) Applicant: Owner: Gama Deer Park. Inc. Date Prepared: September 8, 2008 1. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: none II. New Construction Areas : Dimensions of first floor extension: existine: 30' x 65' addition: 30' x 25' Dimensions of new second floor: none Dimensions of floor above second level: None Height (from finished ground to top of ridge): 20' Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? No If yes, please provide height (above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: III. Proposed Construction if Existing Building Alterations or Structural Changes (attach extra sheet if necessary) - Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: existine building is a gas station with three repair bays with an area approved as an accessory convenience store and a canopy Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: one floor W. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage all buildings on property (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 1950 sci.ft. Proposed increase of building coverage: 750 sg.ft. (25' x 30') Square footage of your lot: 24,829 sg.ft. Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 11% V. Purpose of New Construction: addition to existing commercial building VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): the land is flat, fully developed with a gas station, canopy and permitted accessory convenience store. The building sits on slab and does not have adequate storage space for the proposed convenience store. Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction), and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM (FOR SUBMISSION BY OWNER and OWNER'S AGENT) The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: -Patricia C. Moore-and Gama Deer Park, Inc (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance VarianceX Area Variance Special Exception If "Other", Plannning Board-Site Plan name the activity: Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO _X Complete the balance of this form and date and sign below where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP NONE Submitted [ da f 2®OP Signature Print Na - atricia C. Moorree~ Signature: Print Name: Georg bi Zeid, President GAMA Properties- Deer Park APPRALS BOARD yUMCNgS SCOaTLEAERO dentd P. QfthgMg . Caekm.a S%Mnj o< Citirlea CiNgmie; IS Setae Deym, lr. l TuwnFLO. S3 W'MIhX d . Jatocs Db"*, ir. PAX Bec 117 1{~iew-Yat(c 119'ri BOARDMAPPRAIB Td~home ~s1~.T69-1809 . Ta,a 0516)-765-1823 0 9 9 0 TowumsouTEroLD Upon -application of, 8011 E07YSl e'. a pia PD. variances to the Sontag 0rdinanoe, article g, saotiaa 100-1021 peimi.ssion.to.extablish coaveeiaaos store use in conjunction with'and.accessory to the use _on this substandard Aaron phifl contains lass than 90,000 sq. ft. in lot giea for. each use, and (2) for interpretation as to the height limitation of accessory (cagopy3 structure, and (3) for approval of.caaopy structure is the trout yard location. Location of'Property; Corner of the Smaterly Side.of Factory AVIInue and Northerly-Bids of the main, Road, Mattituck, X(1 District 1640,.eectioa 142, elobtli Lot 27.. W AB,.a Viblic hearing vas held on moveener 1. 199.0•and Conti nnefl oa Movember 29, 1930, ic.tare matter of the Application. . of 6181 EBifb & laBEETiNG 00, wader 'Appeal 1Sc. 8788; end. WSEHEAS; at Paid hearing all those who dsaiced to be,hasrd were.heard and their.;taatimpay recorded; and . . WBSEEAS, the Board has"carefplly considered all teetimonp and documea't,Ation,sulwitted',boaceraiag-thtar applicatiogr.md ' W9RBEA$.,_ther Hoard re, have personally viawad and are familiar with ehc-premises in queetiow. its present sowing, and the su 0u4ding'eseesl and. WIMEa 8the Board made the following findings of facts . 1.' The premiaes:in Imestign, is. a'Corner lot with '150.0" feet along. the: east aide of Fact" -Avenue-and. with 198.0 feet' . along the'north side of the' Ueda k&a..-i-w the ssmint of. - Nattituiok; Town of:Sodthold; wild mere psrtioularly.identified'on the Suffolk Cotinty. Taa.:Maxw , an-nistsi.ot 1000;..9sotioa.142, Blook. 1; Lot 27.:. 2. The subject;pXemiaea-eontaLnu a total.area of 34,.139 ' sq. ft_,lis,located.in'tib "8e•Oen'eral Eluinasr 8oaa DistrSat. , . and. i.s iiwrovdd'vith a 30"'a 664 primipal bus dLug'and two gasoline sarvice .fconcrere)..ialands;: an, as shown: =a Draid 'No'. 4 Page 2 - Appl. No. C88 C Matter of SUN REFINING & MJULK rING Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 13-1318 (Rev. 11) as updated October 29, 1990, prepared by sun Refining & Marketing Company. 3. By this application, the appellant requests Variances: (a) to convert the existing principal building from gasoline sales and vehicle/engine repairs to gasoline sales and accessory convenience store for the on-premises. sales of packaged food and nonfood items, without on-Premises food services, incidental to and in conjunction with the existing gasoline service station use, and : (b) for approval of the location of a new 30 ft. by 103 ft. canopy over new gasoline pumps/island9 with its closest set-backs at 29 feet from-the.. westerly property line along Factory Avenue and at 29 feet.from the southerly. property line along the main Road., as shown on Drawing 13-1318-M (Rev. 2j dated September 14, 1988 (also revibed May 7, 1990)', at a. height at not more than 18 feet above ground- 4. For the record, it is noted that under previous Action of this Hoard under Appl. No. 1225 rendered. January 2, 1969, a Special Exception was granted for a gasoline service and indoor repair station.. 5. in considering this application, it.is the understanding of the Board Members that the items to be sold would include small variety store items, such as packaged and canned foods, magazines, refrigerated items, microwaved items, and the like. 6. The following information is also noted for the record: (a) the premises has continuously for the past 22 years been used as an office for sales of gasoline and other incidental merchandise, with small engine/vehicle repairs within the enclosed three bay areas of the principal building, and gasoline sales at the pumps; (b) the use as a conveniencd store is to be used accessory and incidental to the gasoline-service station and not as aseparate principal use or business establishment; . (e) the existing vehicle lifts and (three) bay areas will be eliminated and replaced with the accessory convenience, store use; (d) the.principal building will not be enlarged without prior approval of the Board of Appeals by subsequent application; c) Page 3 - Appl.,No. K$8 Matter of SUN•RBFINING & M,~RRgG Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 (e). also noted is the interpretation of the board, as requested by the applicant, in that the subject canopy structure is an accessory.strueture, limited to the 18-ft. maximum height zeguitement {aid not the height limitation for a. ,Principal building at 35 feetI, and subject, of course, to the rules as aRply to accessory structures. 7. In considering this application, the Board also finds. and determines: (a) the subject parcel is surrounded by other properties to the north, west, east, and south of the Main Road wbioh•are also located and used as regulated by the General Business '!B" Zone District; (b) the variance, as conditionally noted below, is the minimum necessary to-afford relief; (c) the accessory use as authorized will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood;'. (d) the difficulties are unique, are not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood, and are not personal i.n. nature; (e) there is no other feasible method for appellants to pursue other than a variance; (f) the relief as conditionally granted will, not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of this district or of adjacent use districts; (g) the safety, health, weltare,.comfort, convenience and order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed business use and its location;. Ox) in light of all of the above, the interests of justice will be served by granting the-variances requested and as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested for permission to convert the existing principal building for sales of gasoline and related items; together with an accessory convenience store, SUBJECT To THE FOLLowm CONDITIONS: i 1 Page 4 - APPI. No. 3788 . Matter of EW R$PINAid a lyASiCg2717a. - l-•~~. Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 . 1_ No cooking, except by portable microwave;. _ 2. 90 food preparation (must be pre-packaged - includin cold cats and Sandwiches);. g . 3. No table service or seating for public use; 4. 'Ho signs advertising the oonvenience store use, except by approval of the board of Appeals; . 5. All engine/vehicle repairs and/or car washing'sarvices must arise; 6. No drive-thru. or drive in services; 7. Conveidenoe store sales eba11 be ltsd.ted to self=service (including vending machinea, refrigerators); a. convenience store is permitted only as an accessory use incidental to the principal use an a gasoline service station "(as proposed heraln) and withiz the principal buildlsg'only, and a8 IT PRRTEOR . RzgmvxD, to GRANT a Variance'for the canopy structure of a size 30 ft. by 103 ft_, 29 feet from the westerly property lihe (along Factory Avenue) and 29 feet from the southerly property line (along the state Highway), provided that the canopy structure not exceed Is feet in bsight in the front yard area, as applied. Vote of the Hoard: Ayes. Masora.. Goehringer, Doyen and Diniaio. (Absent was. Nembar.Grigonis due to. illness':) Tots resolution was duly adopted. lk. S;r,Cslf7i~ rr1Mi >•j, .::Na_" 7V' ~ f3HRJ1RD'.P. O C~i'Ry• L=" 9:5;s Tcw-n G°',^rt. Toceza eoAaro~ne~s " . Southold Town HWJ laeyw G*at r get, ctgi t011 63083 Main Road DOJteii.k P.O:'Hat 111x9 X SmAhdd. N9M'Y?ttc 11$71 . ~Vberd'A,d81I(a': f . ~ ~Ct:llkc2ilY: C: WYOOri' F1iccY5~6]' 7~18E3 Tekplgna<(51b7: 78S1so9 . 6011,ifTi`OF;APBEALS... f TOWta OF.SdUTHOLD Ds ii l 4:3885 "APPL fYAO [ AgPY CANT'' `Wizsea. :C f LC7Ei~llOtt O$' JM1n ]iw~d. N~}'. WUNTY ,.p t3T 1000, $P mll CE: tike' 8 ~ ...E sM6ctara PROVIsiow$" SALRD FROMt ArdrJo. X1. Beat[= 100.101C(1) . RJ11EP>$1tQUS5 CdaopY at;aetara over eaatltt~ ~awltoo pamps . whiCh~M9, t,m .4hm.uont,ya;Ld.-at~ea and atom pattiailpr -Shovm on. . . D 08::.66~~`~S1F4:8f9s/al Vxw at" by w., xaae, P,$.:esa Lo'ms pa8anilb.oF''Z Assabatps. MOWQ l M.?11fE. tY. 8ai ~ A., VU?a' SECONDED. BY:. Jamas'Itlnilcfa,- Jr. . ACTIONI ESOLUTION: ADOPTEp: Approved Igoatian a€•eoammwry Y atni re :aa: alioiia:.on..'8i821et 'dra7r~E, :pmvldad: (Y) peat a, gt~e~teet-ii~t be-mod. to padads dtglne.reeular, bvsmaoa boars when: ° ;io 'tba . n~qc- • (2) .'oetbook no .ions' ti:au 11'5• to the ..ptopeQety:ime es : . (3) sabfeet. to atbno:.. applloeble: rWq.,aad 04ajy by, the`Bn1WhL8. Iaepactor_ Q=wy. a4raetrio':.t4• be .`wa-moantbd .yo:'dneo~4 : apDmirtiaYo'. by Lida... HEI:SONSJ~FA'DSNCaS': Gasoline put aGd'SelooQS Aix enactk:g• Camwy is:.eb 1lo6t-type ata,.catre rather rhea a !ally oudo"A %wtm , the o~¢pp : ,ictmais tar egress or iogesa wN tL the piivat. '1'i ttaoant d a canopy atraeture is not an ezp ";oY use and, doge` ,tpt. mrp0e. 1#e17d0 ®d.ar oo4 reQatadaw. piopertg . ceift. i'a d sppnuvat on 'Deoembee 13, 1988 by the Hoard of under Appi. No.. 1825. .(The sate 'at vehtalae;'1s' prohtM*d' s+id" .6` mast r -two ,applioatiaa.) The property aaateios . .two' fi4jnit::jjeiida' oiLfl. virtually has ad, rmar yard tmdar tb# d ose and . . setbsrks tl t$e,LLtLold:, Torres 7,ptlng Code, . e VOTE~OF;THE'$OA$D; .:.AY~~.' 'ae J.'Doyea.a Member: - James. plnido, Jx., ~tOmbflO! . ' - Robert A.:.VM6 Nambor Rieb9td A« NUtoa, Member! ` Deno P..Gaeb , C(ashuma-Member. Thw res&utioa. was •daly adopted: ' 161{6: i ti ' [Yri.rr+riiwr.rY. ::a:~,; . 1% /1?. ]:l'1~ 6'«. ' SAY' Y.Wii~Y ..•'$ny.~..~:...:. L11~ »{I R F Nw Yak j:F , M 4b M`•~1 W id w M 4wfAtl + k..jiu F..rg, tam. . a th ".1 r. 00 cwm kow 4s'~RAW 7+w•in~ ~W'Ca.M f1•Alsi a pdL h ft p- ' rw:i *rrs ..e. Am' Q ~'M.s eaua r r ~iw FP& O 0.0 iy:: = a 0 . OP! 0 g rW • WwwrV JwL . • I.~pMewat~+cr:1.a Ar riYCEX/S11E'NC~l QF~/C.~T Gri Y,eriy yy_ Sd' 111C. IUC ' eFH"+1 Y.~•.4N0 bt efA.ff.MFN75" - "~pj,~W«~' • Of•:QEGC16Gj /F..NVYNO~Si41WtiN s~.E'`YEY • -r' :~l~F.~"GdLrrG ~"O!/NTYT.4~l/liG~4~ `~a M~.TTIT4IGK 7t9~O.; ':°cF`' c` O nt .@ml~QC~QT iC //OGS.tLA2A12- : DATC ..I ammo r s• lift AVn= OF TIC ZONMG Budae OW ArF:..a Appal No: 1i25 Dated 480%*M Zia S M AMON Op TJM ZMMC; BQABD C& APPyAIX CT TdID TOWN OF OMMU fa ' TO k 51Y11r0[ao aw APDdLnt In WOL* ""low" aft* SiMlY1M AAwt >wt at a snorting of t h. Zoning: Baal of Appeals ca for tow.l was oacsW.red end hoo edla. Iadlasty balaw wa. lsbMO m Yatrt (y ) B.abse for variance dm t hwh of soar m p"ala it) -so, t far a spsdM a waft smdt tba Zota t M&Mpor ( ) B.WMt par 4 vsrLa<w to Ihs zmd w (edam . C ) 1. SPECUL ZYCZP=ON_ 87 rrs.7asim of thr Board it was d.fa.m-inod shot • i.a7.1 `0207 ( ) b mad ( ) be Hood pm~'to Artlda 6.Nm IsUb" loa pcepaph swvr.- of ti"' eat Oidm.aoa. mod thm dd.im Of the BWidM9 pow.rwr ( )'be --..d ( ) be because 71115 0 *86 Af.irl.la Iwm tl,1pMe ill m at Bal. Gaaailli akel... am Halt 1$4tmm Asada *OatSWO M OW40Mr a" vw%4 lQaR a Appa#Ml 500 NKU M to Awamdom via ttw s«1sa5 daMMrlM. 5aeit "m go. membAft 4~5-Ya " It ampt 1a to 7A4' "M W. OmWL$ r 4w4w SW W"4" da" 1 Mtrt~aM ywaitic AM >MMWA i4as5 Ims NWMPlaY M O M . of so'sWIM aosfa? am* 00ma$S tmt eraveaq AVON" vn* AMa1I = aftu *Mo. twito am *aMr La1AW" onto fr ]Met! M $00 00$04 MbGpfd 5 4autia!• 5pf 1lalia Raa(1• wF ber 940* M Aft"0. 3. VAN:ourhr Be aralaUm m the Baud It was doaarmlmd (bat _ (e) M Lt aWllrstim of the Ordtoaaca (waW) (wOOM pat) paudnns. Pt"It"al NCladt(e. ar uLaaernsT hardship b.draie (b) Tm h.rdstdv a rsor, cM) (is not) no aw, and ("".gal (woa4( a.t) a shrrd by alt FwwU> .bta to toe lama d)ets I.J L y d Inv paopart7 and In tka adage 00 dwaLet b.ons.. Ms (cj M vod.nce (does) (doss )ot) `'absYve tho IMM of the Ord)nena••nd (woo") (treuid not) decals the eDuaclar of the dt *ki because and Utar'efarr, it ww' dnrfh r de4rmt nd that the r.dbeAOd wuLaw ( ) ha as'®tad ( ) IS denial .ad ,1DYt th. ptwNoaa ded.tmr n ll. B.ildlby Iaspoerar ( ) be -9-9d ( ) be iaYeW.d• i i i i L93190,(aRD OR APPBNe ~ '1P08D[ lta< ~ ..~1 aaawraA i sbwb out tho 4nuomt: woun tea wsaw"I der atom mace,. eaes. awtaaarta trews au aMrvmt is ammembum aaa& tita embs" "Im oa rata 1~a s"* ri 15PA" atetaaaa iastbt as the NA wares od lAaeara AVOO a aed N MMa as aft" awtuoa *Sultatlta Mae waft? emosaitai of a sacs WANGON"bat. Vtp AM W ounce. WPOA Ibm aria %004 aratsraaa U. a. of emao s ad w' my bwsw * "PPS M aftbom aoad"" 11 ad to 140is d spi" aWAWI d w AM 69wd ea* aagal dtapaaaa a" t'an sarammOaaaa swommAsiaa s estpasar AAspiad O twloa. Ow aoaaa IS&& 1Aia aiaavl" st+mUM safe an a*jeet to aM ara" a aapal"Lq" am amw4m sasssoea. *A aaasd Smile ohm attelas OWLumbs" of am 4aaa WWO sail. Isaft is PMOU"L daaiaaattiaa a r > 040 as? tAe tht oo" idasara so, Oa snap" tar ILVIIINOW is "mum some 00 goods="" Soap s 90040A VA Asa4rsaM Mgf~ MA %M tea dMMWr. dtasMaS"s. eC Oft" Vo stwsti" 4 tAe sm"damm viaiaittt #9 Oda P.We tow MA so "m sop" taaa "GUIett usd "a vasia"m daaa 1a11ataatlo a# ¦rku ad tlaa Otditsmmrt and .ix1 nqt oltawDi lilts aAnrro>aea >?d alto d4a>satt~ic: 1tMgtaca", to "M ataatramo ataat CaOIalle arSdat»a ass.. 294 NtZt M A4*wet 'Rota. atmtUmto wamsm. Mw bAO eta, W MMS aaatotri 40.10statlaa alto as lore eta jawwy lawas o as the *"I* Mae 4 mis r ad Na4caaeY,lve"m amd $OVA tb 0%" s"Of wwt&%" t. a w ink* 7Ale MMMaRK%. Am RM11 - ed 40$wt to an kau" t< sFf"O61Ms Sett taaaaiaa aaMPaoa M=aELOttp L Ua mode sara t we* to in fans as 1!s L abtaata talltiMbat} and games iewSeaa 08" se looNai 4w _ fS~MstsrtialrgpwwaT me. i1r pitta of aogx a ia attb,Me A7rwsYa aapta- a. AU aat& oat =40M ai.atsr OdwOm aas dtali be ataaMa at &000 IS d?r 410N OA fatal OW aaaaaR s' IMt Um. 4., No 464aaudi1e94 sr'aOtbombUs FAVWa &UNWaMad nr aatm/at eo"b a" WMAI s aataiat" Amu be Mead its Ow 'afoot bad se dawn ad' MMItiNtea ~ am amp 6*60 "Mu" Amu be >a"W"440 16 slow to be so aaW" farm iia"016 we aMaula *w ad a w &AUMM SO* 4CAUEOft 4d ON VOII~ 09. 00600" s. AU aa/arya Ratdta alerts be Maati W atadadaltawd. to trio almme Aatad b "04 7~a ~{I' a aatd Ma OR aaM 100 boo 10 ataat)1aa ~ MtotttPU M . aaatt Ow arena a< datlaata. At a mating oa April 3, 1969, a motion was made and carried to corract error in item.# 2 (above). it should road as,followo; 2. planpM, lubricating, and other~eo~'anagt aball be located atma wat iaaet 15 .feet from the line of nay strestbr highway, right-of-May or property Sine. 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Pat 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ? Part 1 ? Part 2 ?Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ® A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration Will be prepared. ? B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared. ? C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. •A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 0 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action -/n.` 11 66j joca~iy,~_-n/GL . S>~m Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) y i!'A - rT t -wt rC N i 145 Z SK- M ~ Cd Name of Applicant/Sponsor C~{1PA Dame, ~C~Pb`x'7f - 1~%/-j(ivL iyrl Address -S2C7 Fi-Q '7 city/PO 04.0 f3rCx~ic tJ1 ~ State /.,Sy Zip Code Business Telephone Name of Owner (if different) Address city / PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: J,0 Crahf C/ed67 rAW= &Kar1fV 4- Cv05C:5L4ova !5~QJ C-%t 5~4yr~J c~tvvc rc? Fz tvp,;,s S;7' .,,t- q,1~ Z'~ ~vrt~-tK a 75~ ~.ts, Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: ?Urban ? Industrial ® Commercial ? Residential (suburban) ? Rural (non-farm) ? Forest ? Agriculture ? Other 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces O . y3 acres 33 acres Other (Indicate type) 1-g 01'<Cp (eoeis" 0,/7- acres 0 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? (C.75 6,11 AVJD 6v/ Lam' , TGA~ a. Soil drainage: Well drained U4% of site Moderately well drained 1f° % of site. ?Poorlydrained -%of site b. If any agricultural land is in~{o d, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? tJ acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ? Yes ® No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ?0-10% 100% ?10- 15%_% ? 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantial) contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? LJ Yes 0 No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ® Yes ®No 8. What is the depth of the water table?_' 0 (in feet) g. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 12 Yes ? No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ? Yes No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ?Yes R No According to: F Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? QYes RLNo Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ? Yes KNo If es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ?Yes No 1 -7 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NOr-1111119 a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: r4v-Nv b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ® Yes ® No a, If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ® Yes ? No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ®Yes MNo W-M 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, section 303 and 304? ?Yes ®No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? 11, No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? © Yes M N o B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). . a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 0 .5Sacres. b. Project acreage to be developed: d. 55 acres initially; b+ $.5 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 6.00 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: J _{J- (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. j4% f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? $GC A-I h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: 4/N One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: _7, height; -9:;~ width; c~D length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 90 ton cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed 1:1 Yes ?No RN/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? F b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes ® No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ? Yes ® No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0,00 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ? Yes ® No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: -4.- months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year, d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ? Yes ? No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ? Yes No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction after project is complete ~j 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project . 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ? Yes 1,5aNo If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ? Yes ONO a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste did ^ 3AnU>~y 1 1n~fo disposal involved? R1 Yes ? No Type.alwqr t,yrr QC a, rt ra ~ 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ? Yes 10 1 No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ? Yes EZVo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Yes ? No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? to tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Yes ? No / c3WNr ~,A o f U ~orao! urro~ W C. If yes, give name 7442nd fkR X37; r/r-~:J ; location ±W:'01 d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ?Yes ONO Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ?Yes RNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ?Yes 0 No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? 11 YesNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ?Yes ®No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ® Yes ? No If yes, indicate type(s) C:LG~/iCLC'~r4ti.. s'7`~.~L~Gry I~Y( LIGr,Cj/KC 1~~ ~~F'~rF~fi.{~f 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N iq gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 5CIO gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ? Yes 0 No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ? Yes ® No ~S/?c3 Gz nr] City, Town, Village Planning Board [Z]Yes F1 No ~PrIb1SQ~l~ V12~cx,~ City, Town Zoning Board ®Yes ? No ~CdCS73tff C~tl'wll'ifa14M) S~Y@YIL City, County Health Department ~ Yes ? No Other Local Agencies ? Yes No I Other Regional Agencies ? Yesl ® No ~I lV~~7 State Agencies 19 Yes No i Federal Agencies ? YesNo II ii C. Zoning and Planning lydonnation 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? L1,/IYes ? No If Yes, indicate decision required: 10 ? Zoning amendment Zoning variance ? New/revision of master plan ? Subdivision tSSite plan ? Special use permit ? Resource management plan ? Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? tcss g - 6-44~r4~xpr' Os/ CA 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 7, 7 y2 5, r-, 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? f!j-Gc+ - t2'%--VJI.C~+d 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a A mile radius of proposed action? C'4z t rt l A,-- JryY ,L;T t •-r - 1.6. C 57bxc- S A1o 6K~PIafftw krAo a. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a A mile,l?]j Yes ? No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? © Yes No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? W]Yes No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? 'Yes rl No SfZc, rldlr 5L~(~/ //cGR.ES7 r14 Y$cS/cOyr(C. S 2rf 6 VfAgy r. Icx. w 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Yes E] No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. JaYes © No - r -11-V, 144w D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information ~ _provided above is true to the best of my kknnowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Named/rf/~? .~lf$f r,4/C9-/a-L' Date ct Signature PQ r Alf Title ~rl~rs26~/C~VI If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessrtlent Pone before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 Additional Information for Ouestions B1¢ and C11 There is currently a gasoline service station and convenience store operating on the site. Based on the traffic data contained in Dunn Engineering Associates, P. C.'s November 2, 2007 traffic study, the operations conducted at the site currently generate the vehicle trips contained in Table 1 - Existing Trip Generation for both the weekday AM peak hour of 7:00 to 9:00 AM and the weekday PM peak hour of 4:00 to 6:00 PM. Table 1- Existine Trip Generation SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC DEVELOPEMNT WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 7:00 TO 8:00 AM 4:00 TO 5:00 AM ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT EXISTING GAS 28 30 38 34 STATION As can be determined from the data contained in Table 1 above, the existing site operations generate a total of 58 trips per hour during the AM peak hour of 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 72 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. It is anticipated that the conversion of the gasoline service station and convenience store to a 7-Eleven convenience store will generate additional trips during both the AM and PM peak hours due to the increase in the size of the convenience store by the removal of the services bays and the expansion of the existing building. The additional trips generated by the proposed conversion can be determined utilizing the standard calculations complied by the Institute of Transportation Engineers contained in its 7`" Edition of Trip Generation 2003. The trip generation for the proposed action is contained in Table 2 - Proposed Trip Generation and was determined by using Land Use 851: "Convenience Market Open 24 Hours" for the proposed 2,700 square foot 7-Eleven. Table 2 - Proposed Trip Generation ITE CALCULATED GENERATED TRAFFIC DEVELOPEMNT WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 7:00 TO 8:00 AM 4:00 TO 5:00 AM ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT 7-Eleven 91 91 75 69 1 0 As can be determined from the data contained in Table 2 above, the proposed 7- Eleven will generate a total of 182 trips per hour during the AM peak hour of 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 144 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. Therefore, the proposed 7-Eleven will generate 124 additional trips per hour during the AM peak hour of 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 72 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. However, it should be noted that based on pervious studies, convenience stores normally serve motorists that are passing by on their way to their primary destination. Therefore, the 7-Eleven should not generate a significant number of new trips because the majority of the costumer base is already on the adjacent roadway network In order to determine the affect of the additional traffic on the capacity of the surrounding roadways, we have assumed that 50% of the additional trips generated by the proposed 7-eleven will be new trips and not pass through trips. Based on this assumption, the proposed 7-Eleven will generate 62 additional trips per hour during the AM peak hour of 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 36 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. In addition, based on the data contained in the above-mentioned Dunn Engineering Associates, P. C.'s report, 51% of the traffic on Main Road proceeds in the westbound direction, 43% of the traffic on Main Road proceeds in the eastbound direction, 2% of the traffic on Factory Avenue proceeds in the northbound direction, and 4% of the traffic on Factory Avenue proceeds in the southbound direction during the AM peak hour. Based on these figures, we have developed the roadway capacity analysis contained in Table 3 - Roadway Capacity Analysis AM Peak Hours. Table 3 - Roadway Capacity Analysis AM Peak Hours. DIRECTION EXSITING PROPOSED TOTAL TRIPS CAPACITY TRIPS TRIPS MAIN ROAD 843 32 875 872 WB MAIN ROAD 716 29 745 1174 EB FACTORY 39 2 41 158 AVENUE NB FACTORY 64 3 67 188 AVENUE SB Further, based on the analysis present above, we calculated the roadway capacity for the 36 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. Once again, based on the data contained in the above-mentioned Dunn Engineering Associates, P. C.'s report, 41% of the traffic on Main Road proceeds in the westbound direction, 49% of the 2 0 0 traffic on Main Road proceeds in the eastbound direction, 3% of the traffic on Factory Avenue proceeds in the northbound direction, and 7% of the traffic on Factory Avenue proceeds in the southbound direction during the PM peak hour. Based on these figures, we have developed the roadway capacity analysis contained in Table 4 - Roadway Capacity Analysis PM Peak Hours. Table 4 - Roadway Capacity Analysis PM Peak Hours. DIRECTION EXSITING PROPOSED TOTAL TRIPS CAPACILITY TRIPS TRIPS MAIN ROAD 898 15 913 895 WB MAIN ROAD 1059 18 1077 1153 EB FACTORY 63 1 62 158 AVENUE NB FACTORY 154 2 156 204 AVENUE SB Therefore, based upon our review of the data contained in Tables 3 and 4 above, the additional traffic generated by the proposed 7-Eleven has an affect on the capacity of Main Road in the westbound direction during both the AM and PM peak hours. The westbound lanes of Main Road are at capacity during the AM peak hours and at 1.02% of capacity during the PM peak hours. However, we do not believe that the proposed 7- Eleven will adversely affect the capacity of Main Road because the data contained in Tables 3 and 4 did not account for turning movements within the intersection, which should reduce the traffic on Main Road to below its capacity. In addition, in all probability, the amount of pass through traffic will higher then the 50% factor assigned in the above analysis, which will further reduce the added trips along Main Road. Therefore, the proposed 7-Eleven should not be adversely effect the traffic in the surrounding area. 3 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) I In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific projector site other examples and/or lower thresholds maybe appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. I The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. I In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. Q If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO © YES ? Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot ? ? ? Yes ? No rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ® ? ? Yes ? No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ? ? ? Yes ®No vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ? ? ? Yes ? No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ? ? ? Yes ? No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ? © Yes [:]No more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ? ? ?Yes ? No Construction in a designated fioodway. ? ? ?Yes ? No Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e.,cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) ®NO ?YES • Specific land forms: ? ? ?Yes ?No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ?NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of ? ? ? Yes ? No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water ? ? ? Yes ? No. body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ? ? ® Yes ? No Other impacts: ? ? ? Yes ? No 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ®NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ? ? ? Yes ? No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ? ? ?Yes ? No area. • Other impacts: ® ? ?Yes ? No Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ?NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ? ? ? Yes ? No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ? ® ? Yes ® No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ? ? ?Yes ? No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ? ? ? Yes ? No Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ? ? ? Yes ? No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ? ? ? Yes No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ? ? ? Yes ? No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Actiorf will require the storage of petroleum or ? ? ? Yes ? No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ? ? ?Yes ? No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ? ? ? Yes ? No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: ? ? ?yes ? No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows ? ? ?Yes ?No Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ? ? ?Yes ? No Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ? O ? Yes ? No floodway. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 1 -.1 IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ? ? ?Yes ? No given hour. Proposed Actionwill result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ? ? ?Yes ?No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5lbs. per hour ? ? ?Yes ?No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ? ? ?Yes ? No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ? ? ?Yes O No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action.affect any threatened or endangered species? ®NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or ? ? ?Yes ?No Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of © ? ?Yes ? No agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different ? ? ?Yes ? No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ? ? ?Yes ? No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ? ? ? Yes ? No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No WACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ? NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ® [1 Yes ®No • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or 13 substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ? ® ® Yes ? No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ? ? , ? Yes ? No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Other impacts: ? ? ? Yes ? No NPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ? ? ? Yes ? No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ? ? ?Yes ? No Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? ?NO ?YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ? ? ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ? ? ? Yes ? No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ? ? ? Yes ?No resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the ? ? ?Yes ?No resource? Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there bean effect to existing transportation systems? ? NO ? YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or ? ? ?Yes ? No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the ? O ?Yes ? No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ? ? ? Yes ? No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes O No NOISE AND ODOR MPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ? ? Oyes O No facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ? ? ? Yes ? No Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ? ? ?Yes ? No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ? ? ?Yes ? No noise screen. Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No Page 18 of 21 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the L WRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 AGENT: Patricia C. Moore Esq 51020 Main Road Soutold NY 11971 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ? Planning Dept. X Building Dept. ? Board of Trustees ? Zoning Board of Appeals X (exempt-area variance)_ 1 Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ? (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) ? (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: ? Type: Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 1 Nature and extent of action: existing gas station with three garage bays gas canopy and accessory conveninence store replaced with one retail use (7-11 convenience store) site plan and variance to add 25' x 30' to existing building requires variance to maintain existing rear yard setback and exceeds 60' linear rule Location of action: 9945 Rt.25. Mattituck Site acreage: 24.829 sq.ft. Present land use: existing gas station with three garage bays gas canopy and accessory conveninence store replaced with one retail use (7-11 convenience store) Present zoning classification: Business 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Gama Deer Park Inc (b) Mailing address: c/o GAZ Realty, Inc. 366 North Broadway Suite 206 Jericho. '7 11753 (c) Telephone number: 516 513-0155 Ext 333 (d) Application number, if any: _ Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ? No X If yes, which state or federal agency: _ Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 2 DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ? Not Applicable Discussion (if appropriate): Existing building uses will be reduced to one conforming retail busiess use. Existing property is fully developed and proposed addition is required because the existing garage structure has no storage space (on slab) Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes O No O Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): the gas station with canopy will be eliminated and a single use retail business is proposed NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): ¢as station is eliminated- hazardous materials will no Ion er• be sold from this site Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Porte 3 Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): since a potentially hazardous material site (gas station) will be eliminated, risk to wildlife is eliminated Policy 7 Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III - Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): gas station repplaced with a retail use (7-11) Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): proposed 7-11 does not create grater solid waste then other retail uses PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 4 0 • Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III- Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate); Gas station supplies use of energy and mineral resources retail has no impact on energy or mineral resources *copy of Town form created on 2/11/06 Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 5 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the To al Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning D`epartmen t rari@s at ~ t ~ the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION ' _ 9 2"08 i SEP ' SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 w AGENT: Patricia C. Moore Esq.. 51020 Main Road. Soutold NV 11971 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response):' Town Board ? Planning Dept. X Building Dept. ? Board of Trustees ? Zoning Board of Appeals X (exempt-area variance)- 1 Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ? (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) ? (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: ? Type: Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 1 Nature and extent of action: existine eas station with three garage bays, gas canopy and accessory conveninence store replaced with one retail use (7-11 convenience store) site plan and variance to add 25' x 30' to existing building requires variance to maintain existing rear yard setback and exceeds 60' linear rule Location of action: 9945 Rt.25, Mattituck Site acreage: 24.829 sg.ft. Present land use: existingeas station with three garage bays, gas canopy and accessory conveninence store replaced with one retail use (7-11 convenience store) Present zoning classification: Business 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Gama Deer Park, Inc (b) Mailing address: c/o GAZ Realty, Inc.. 366 North Broadway, Suite 206 Jericho, NY 11753 (c) Telephone number: (516 ) 513-0155 Ext 333 (d) Application number, if any: _ Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ? No X If yes, which state or federal agency: Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 2 DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ? Not Applicable Discussion (if appropriate): Existing building uses will be reduced to one conforming retail busiess use. Existing property is fully developed and proposed addition is required because the existing garage structure has no storage space (on slab) Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold See LWRP Section III- Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes O No O Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): the gas station with canopy will be eliminated and a single use retail business is proposed NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): gas station is eliminated- hazardous materials will no longer be sold from this site Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 3 • i Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): since a potentially hazardous material site (gas station) will be eliminated, risk to wildlife is eliminated Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III - Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): gas station repplaced with a retail use (7-11) Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section 111-Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): proposed 7-11 does not create grater solid waste then other retail uses PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section 111- Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 4 6 i Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section 111- Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): _ Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section 711- Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ? Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ? Not Applicable ? Discussion (if appropriate): Gas station supplies use of energy and mineral resources, retail has no impact on energy or mineral resources. *copy of Town form created on 2/11/06 Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 5 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ® Part 1 ? Part 2 ?Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ? A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ? B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ? C. The project may result in one or more large and important im acts that may have a significant impact on thel environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared; *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions I Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Rrs ibfd Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action -7- / i ~Stje,Css Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) 9 "15 kOY40 rn A -z-r t K N ?1 ?5 Z S _ FF~ Cu Name of Applicant/Sponsor 6Aty\ trU~JP~~lL7/(.~5- Plm.rt, ley.', Address 32(2 FLUiZ &NVO City/PO Ue-0 f3e-CjJLl'' State J,j Zip Code f f Business Telephone Name of Owner (if different) Address City / PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: /-0 Cv/~I(J~sC1 7fv*-5 E!7XcSYii'v- Co ~ovQ ~3~~t.7J~es 5'~111iwJ 11 ~ O Gu N uLFN ) tu; ` ecs S>Gac fzr /c~S7c~ & - - iLs-L efv g r l jtNr_":5 s?-c_aC,E3 PAP rJ LUNS"ttC~~ 7 j~ .N', G7C7 I'j v i v 1 ~ k,"1t' C~ V ti ~ ~ rJ I ~D e N~-d , Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: ? Urban ? Industrial ® Commercial ? Residential (suburban) ? Rural (non-farm) Forest ? Agriculture ? Other 2. Total acreage of project area: w acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces p O 1'43 acres 0,33 acres Other (Indicate type) L Ra~9 ~~C.(a Oi v~~ "f t2~ 0.12 acres y • L 2 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? A.40 r-l(,'t-- ~ n U a. Soil drainage: 91 Well drained -i4% of site l,~y Moderately well drained % of site. ?Poorly drained of site b. If any agricultural land is in o d, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ? Yes No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 100-10% j00% ?10- 15%_% ? 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantial) contiguous to, Jo'r'I contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes 4L~.1 No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ? Yes ?No 8. What is the depth of the water table? '2/,? (in feet) g. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ?Yes ? No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ? Yes L No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ?Yes RNo According to: F Identify each s cies: F 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ?Yes RNo Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ? Yes KNo If es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ®Yes No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NONuS a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: NZ,~J+3 b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ® Yes No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Eyes ® No Yes yMNo b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? F Will 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ©Yes ® No 19. Is the site located in or substantiall contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? FYes No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes No y B. Project Description 1 . Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: Q -5 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 6.5 5 acres initially; y -5.'; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: &.00 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? Sif& h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: I'l IP, One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: Z!L- height; 3b width; 10 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ~ 16ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? ton cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ?Yes 1:1 No [IRN/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? F b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 1:1 Yes E]No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 1:1 Yes ? No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0,00 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ? Yes EgNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? E ]Yes ? No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ? Yes No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 2 . 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ? Yes 15a No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ? Yes R) No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged ~9 ^J191J/7/kG~ v.JYY1:3~ 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? WSJ Yes ? No Type A-ciV 5:Z .&Y" C LOAi rv 4i nP 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ? Yes RNo If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ? Yes Qo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? EkYes ? No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 10 tons{ b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? {Yes ? No ! 0'_)J n/ o1w ' c. If yes, give name 7R v:J location U IZo~ ° / 4NO A~~Js rt. -S7A'y~ d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ©Yes ONO No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ?Yes RNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ?Yes 0 No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ?Yes'No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ?Yes ED No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ? Yes ? No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity LA gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day '500 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ? Yes ~ No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ? Yes 10 No City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes ? No /~7v/+(LOU O~li Vr~f~,tr City, Town Zoning Board ® Yes ? No /~~yP.,cSC+Fttd City, County Health Department 5a Yes ® No ~1'^r 7 ~ f't17J Other Local Agencies ? Yes No Other Regional Agencies ? Yes ® No State Agencies MYes 7• No L v , Ge~rc.~, Cv~ Federal Agencies ? Yes 159No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes ? No If Yes, indicate decision required: ~f ? Zoning amendment Zoning variance ? New/revision of master plan ? Subdivision tR'Site plan Special use permit ? Resource management plan ? Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? Fj GctaiRC~ g:~~~ VAS 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 7,742 5r 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? G ~tr~~t S ie.t':MSd 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? T .7`12 S C, 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes ? No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? 6D- nM ).G. C S?c S A,)n 6~zjr'(& g. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a'/4 mile? 1 Yes ® No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? M a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 0 • 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ? Yes pa No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? PuYes _No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? L19 Yes © No C'~-mrr,~..l,i~ ~~v'i~ ?f~s cu-,c,cc~crw' ~v~v~ ~ S I Z i cdN si i f ~y r ?~G (~E~ra°ae r4 Y3c>wf>>r~t S/ ?~c~<s c~ l v c 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Yes ? No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ayes ? No S&-t A-1 TtlG) lok~9 D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my ,knowledge. f Applicant/Sponsor Name C M R">PE'~7 t;:f _.OeCKA(Ci(-1AJ/ Date G IJ Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Forth before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 Additional Information for Ouestions BIZ and C11 There is currently a gasoline service station and convenience store operating on the site. Based on the traffic data contained in Dunn Engineering Associates, P. C.'s November 2, 2007 traffic study, the operations conducted at the site currently generate the vehicle trips contained in Table 1 - Existing Trip Generation for both the weekday AM peak hour of 7:00 to 9:00 AM and the weekday PM peak hour of 4:00 to 6:00 PM. Table 1 - Existina Trip Generation SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC DEVELOPEMNT WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 7:00 TO 8:00 AM 4:00 TO 5:00 AM ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT EXISTING GAS 28 30 38 34 STATION As can be determined from the data contained in Table 1 above, the existing site operations generate a total of 58 trips per hour during the AM peak hour of 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 72 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. It is anticipated that the conversion of the gasoline service station and convenience store to a 7-Eleven convenience store will generate additional trips during both the AM and PM peak hours due to the increase in the size of the convenience store by the removal of the services bays and the expansion of the existing building. The additional trips generated by the proposed conversion can be determined utilizing the standard calculations complied by the Institute of Transportation Engineers contained in its 7`h Edition of Trip Generation 2003. The trip generation for the proposed action is contained in Table 2 - Proposed Trip Generation and was determined by using Land Use 851: "Convenience Market Open 24 Hours" for the proposed 2,700 square foot 7-Eleven. Table 2 - Proposed Trip Generation ITE CALCULATED GENERATED TRAFFIC DEVELOPEMNT WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 7:00 TO 8:00 AM 4:00 TO 5:00 AM ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT 7-Eleven 91 91 75 69 I As can be determined from the data contained in Table 2 above, the proposed 7- Eleven will generate a total of 182 trips per hour during the AM peak hour of 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 144 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. Therefore, the proposed 7-Eleven will generate 124 additional trips per hour during the AM peak hour of 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 72 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. However, it should be noted that based on pervious studies, convenience stores normally serve motorists that are passing by on their way to their primary destination. Therefore, the 7-Eleven should not generate a significant number of new trips because the majority of the costumer base is already on the adjacent roadway network. In order to determine the affect of the additional traffic on the capacity of the surrounding roadways, we have assumed that 50% of the additional trips generated by the proposed 7-eleven will be new trips and not pass through trips. Based on this assumption, the proposed 7-Eleven will generate 62 additional trips per hour during the AM peak hour of 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 36 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. In addition, based on the data contained in the above-mentioned Dunn Engineering Associates, P. C.'s report, 51 % of the traffic on Main Road proceeds in the westbound direction, 43% of the traffic on Main Road proceeds in the eastbound direction, 2% of the traffic on Factory Avenue proceeds in the northbound direction, and 4% of the traffic on Factory Avenue proceeds in the southbound direction during the AM peak hour. Based on these figures, we have developed the roadway capacity analysis contained in Table 3 - Roadway Capacity Analysis AM Peak Hours. Table 3 - Roadway Capacity Analysis AM Peak Hours. DIRECTION EXSITING PROPOSED TOTAL TRIPS CAPACITY TRIPS TRIPS MAIN ROAD 843 32 875 872 WB MAIN ROAD 716 29 745 1174 EB FACTORY 39 2 41 158 AVENUE NB FACTORY 64 3 67 188 AVENUE SB Further, based on the analysis present above, we calculated the roadway capacity for the 36 trips per hour during the PM peak hour of 4:00 to 5:00 PM. Once again, based on the data contained in the above-mentioned Dunn Engineering Associates, P. C.'s report, 41 % of the traffic on Main Road proceeds in the westbound direction, 49% of the 2 traffic on Main Road proceeds in the eastbound direction, 3% of the traffic on Factory Avenue proceeds in the northbound direction, and 7% of the traffic on Factory Avenue proceeds in the southbound direction during the PM peak hour. Based on these figures, we have developed the roadway capacity analysis contained in Table 4 - Roadway Capacity Analysis PM Peak Hours. Table 4 - Roadway Capacity Analysis PM Peak Hours. DIRECTION EXSITING PROPOSED TOTAL TRIPS CAPACILITY TRIPS TRIPS MAIN ROAD 898 15 913 895 WB MAIN ROAD 1059 18 1077 1153 EB FACTORY 63 1 62 158 AVENUE NB FACTORY 154 2 156 204 AVENUE SB Therefore, based upon our review of the data contained in Tables 3 and 4 above, the additional traffic generated by the proposed 7-Eleven has an affect on the capacity of Main Road in the westbound direction during both the AM and PM peak hours. The westbound lanes of Main Road are at capacity during the AM peak hours and at 1.02% of capacity during the PM peak hours. However, we do not believe that the proposed 7- Eleven will adversely affect the capacity of Main Road because the data contained in Tables 3 and 4 did not account for turning movements within the intersection, which should reduce the traffic on Main Road to below its capacity. In addition, in all probability, the amount of pass through traffic will higher then the 50% factor assigned in the above analysis, which will further reduce the added trips along Main Road. Therefore, the proposed 7-Eleven should not be adversely effect the traffic in the surrounding area. 3 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) I In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. I The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. I The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. I The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. I In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO ? YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot ? ? ? Yes ? No rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ? ® ? Yes ? No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ? ? ? Yes ?No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ? ? ? Yes ? No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ? ? ? Yes ? No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ? ? ? Yes ?No more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Construction in a designated floodway. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) F1 NO 17 YES • Specific land forms: ? ? ?Yes ?No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) nNO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ? ® ?Yes [3 No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of © ? ?Yes ? No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water ? ? ?Yes ? No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Other impacts: © ? ?Yes ? No 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water7 r7 NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ? ? ? Yes ? No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ? ® ? Yes ? No area. • Other impacts: ?Yes ? No Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? 1:1 NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ? ? ? Yes ? No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ? ? ? Yes ® No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ? ? ? Yes ? No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ? ? ?Yes ? No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ? ? ? Yes ? No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ? ? ? Yes ? No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ? ? ? Yes ? No perday. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ? ? ?Yes ? No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action'will require the storage of petroleum or ? ? ? Yes ? No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ® ? ?Yes ? No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ? ? ? Yes © No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No Page 13 of 21 • 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows ? ? ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ® ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ? ? ?Yes ?No floodway. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ? ? ?Yes ?No given hour. • Proposed Action. will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ? ? ?Yes ?No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5lbs. per hour ? ? ?Yes ?No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ? ? ?Yes ?No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of © ? ?Yes ?No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action.affect any threatened or endangered species? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or ? ? ?Yes ?No Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 0 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ? ? ?Yes ?No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No g. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ? ? ?Yes ? No or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of © ? ? Yes ? No mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to ? ? ? Yes ? No agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of © ? ? Yes ? No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ? ? [:]Yes ? No acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of ? © ?Yes ? No agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping): or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different ? ? ?Yes ? No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ? ? ?Yes ? No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ? ? ?Yes ? No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or ? ? ? Yes ? No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ? ? ? Yes ? No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ® ? ? Yes ? No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 • 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ? ? ?Yes ?No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? ?NO ?YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ? ? ? Yes ? No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ? ? ? Yes ? No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ? ? ?Yes ?No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the ? ? ?Yes ?No resource? • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ? NO ? YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or ? ? ?Yes ? No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the ? ? ?Yes ? No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ? ? ?Yes ? No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ?NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ? ? ?Yes ? No faculty. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ? ? ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ? ? ?Yes ? No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ? ? ?Yes ? No noise screen. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ?NO ?YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ? ? ?Yes ? No hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" ? ? ?Yes ? No in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ? ? ?Yes ?No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ? ? ?Yes ? No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON GRONRH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ? ? ?Yes ? No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ? ? ?Yes ?No services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ? ? ?Yes ?No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ? ? ?Yes ?No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community ? ? ?Yes ?No services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future © M Yes ? No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ® ©Yes Q No • Other impacts: © QYes ? No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? [7] NO r7YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: ! The probability of the impact occurring ! The duration of the impact ! Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value ! Whether the impact can or will be controlled ! The regional consequence of the impact ! Its potential divergence from local needs and goals ! Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 - - - MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBOIS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Oak SO(/lyO Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR P Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND D1yk l Southold, NY u11 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: November 21, 2008 Re: Checks The referenced application(s) has/have been approved by the Planning Board and the check(s) may now be processed. Thank you. Project Name & Type Tax Map # Amount Check Date Chase Bank Mattituck-Std.Sub.Sketch 143-3-33.2 1,250.00 5/30/08 Chase Bank Mattituck-Std.Sub.Sketch 143-3-33.2 500.00 5/29/08 Nickart Real Subdiv./Cond. Sketch 52-2-13 1,000.00 5/2/08 Owen Construction Corp. Site Plan 102-2-12.5 500.00 7/21/08 Scott, John G. - Subdiv. 75-6-3 500.00 8/5/08 S.AM.E.S. Site Plan 59-3-31 500.00 9/22/08 Zuckerber , Lloyd P. - Cons. Subdiv. 86-1-10.9 1,200.00 9/23/08 7-11 Mattituck Site Plan 142-1-27 572.00 10/31/08 LR 6 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS pF P.O. Box 1179 SO(/ryO JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair ` OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G INC 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND imSouthold, NY ~U Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: November 4, 2008 Re: Check The referenced check may now be processed. Thank you. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map # Amount Check Date/No. Type Authorization Code 7-11 Mattituck/GAMA SEQRA 142-1-27 $1,350 10/30/08 #1028 LR • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Oy~~OF Sf)(/Typ Southold, NY 11971 Chair o OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G ' Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (wr. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND I,YCOU Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: October 31, 2008 Re: Payments Attached are the checks listed below. Payments are for deposit into a deferred account. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Amount Check bate/No. Type # Valero Site Plana . 102-5-26 $500 10/28/08 #6147 7-11 Mattituck Site Plana . 142-1-27 $572 9/29/08 #1020 Encs. LR 1 1 TRAFFIC IM ~ PACT STUDY 1 7=ELEVEN CONVENIENCE 1 STORE 1 -J MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 1 i 1 1 Prepared for: 1 GAMA Properties, Inc. 1 1 Prepared by: DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C. 1 1 FEBRUARY 2010 1 REVISED SEPTEMBER 2010 W. 1-11 Mapimck-28104 Wk: SEP77010/rlS.doc ' Table of Contents Introduction I Purpose of Report 2 Location 2 ' Study Approach 6 Existing Roadway Network 9 ' Roadway Characteristics 10 Grades and Sight Distances 1 I Existing Traffic Flow Conditions 12 ' Traffic Volumes 13 Accident Records 13 ' Site Trip Generation Analysis 16 Other Planned Developments 19 Directional Distribution Analysis 21 Traffic Assignment Analysis 29 Intersection Capacity Analysis 34 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 35 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 38 Parking 39 ' Additional Considerations 41 Truck Access and Circulation 42 Traffic Activity at Adjacent Properties 45 ' Radius Improvement at Main Road at Factory Avenue 47 Queue Analysis on Factory Avenue 48 Conclusions 50 Appendix Analyses 55 Intersection Capacity ' Traffic Volume Data Accident Data Roadway Improvement Plans i NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1 1 1 1 NP: 7-I1 Mattituck-28104 1 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 Purpose of Report ' This Traffic Impact Study contains the results of a traffic engineering examination of the proposed 7 - Eleven Convenience Store in Mattituck Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. At present, the site contains a gas station with eight fueling stations, two service bays that are currently unused, and a small convenience store. The project envisions removing the gas station use, and renovation and expansion of the existing structure to provide a 2,670 square foot building housing a convenience store. This report appraises the traffic aspects of the proposed development with particular etiipiiasis on its impact on the surrounding street and highway network. Location The site is located on the northeast corner of NYS Route 25, Main Road, at Factory Avenue, in Mattituck. The site has access to both NYS Route 25 and to Factory Avenue. There is one existing driveway on Factory Avenue and two on Main Road. The gas station is surrounded on two sides by a shopping center. Figure 1, Area Map, indicates the location of the Town of Southold in the New York Metropolitan area. The project site is shown in Figure 2, Location Map, while Figure 3, Site Map, presents the boundaries of the proposed development, and the adjacent roadway network. I NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 2 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc Map of the COUNTY OF SUFFOLK LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK Q- N sourHmn Jam, LONG ISLAND SOUND ATLANTIC OCEAN ftft FIGURE 1 AREA MAP DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C. DATE PAGE 1' = 9.7 MILESt January 2010 3 1 1 1 1 1 STUDY APPROACH i 1 1 1 NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc III The Town of Southold has requested that a traffic study be performed for this project. In accordance with this request, the following tasks were undertaken: ' I. Several personal, on-site field observations were made to observe the traffic movements under various conditions. 2. A physical inventory was made of the adjacent street network. ' 3. Traffic data as available from the New York State Department of Transportation, the Town of Southold and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates was reviewed. 4. The Traffic Study prepared by Atlantic Traffic and Design Engineers, Inc. for the planned ' development of a Chase Bank branch located in the vicinity of the proposed project was reviewed. 5. Traffic counts were conducted at the existing gas station occupying the site to determine the ' amount of traffic currently being generated by the site. 1 6. An accident analysis was performed, based on records regarding accidents that have occurred on the roadway network in the vicinity of the site obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation, for the most recent three-year period available. ' 7. A trip generation analysis was performed to determine the additional traffic attributable to the proposed redevelopment. 8. Trip assignment analyses were performed to examine the composite traffic volumes that would result due to the addition of the site-generated traffic to the background traffic volumes, in order to determine the traffic impacts on the adjacent roadways. 9. Capacity analyses were performed at appropriate locations to determine existing levels of service ' as well as future levels of service with and without completion of the project. NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 7 File: SEPT20I0/TIS.doc ' 10. Proposed access to and from the site was examined from the standpoint of location and design, including the ability of trucks to enter and leave the site. 11. A review of the proposed parking, and an analysis of its ability to meet the Town code and the anticipated demand, based on information provided in the ITE report, Parking Generation, was conducted. 12. Traffic activity at adjacent land uses was investigated. ' ls. Comments on the study based on a review by the Town of Southold's traffic consultant were ' reviewed and addressed, when appropriate. 14. Conclusions were made of the traffic impact of the development as a result of the data and the facts gathered in this study. ' NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 8 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 1 1 1 1 r r i i 1 EXISTING ROADWAY 1 NETWORK 1 1 1 NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 9 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc ' Roadway Characteristics ' The site is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue in Mattituck, Town of Southold, New York. Main Road is a New York State highway facility ' designated NYS Route 25 that provides direct access to the site. Although NYS Route 25 extends the entire length of Long Island, it serves as "Main Street" for many of the communities along the north fork of Long Island, including Mattituck. Near the site of the proposed development, Main Road provides one lane in each direction, flanked by shoulders, with additional turning lanes at major ' intersections. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Development along Main Road near the site is primarily commercial. The intersection of NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue is controlled by a traffic signal that is ' maintained by NYSDOT. This signal also controls the northbound approach of Sigsbee Road, which is off-set to the west from Factory Avenue. Factory Avenue forms a slightly acute angle with Main ' Road, as it is skewed to the northeast, resulting in a non-standard turning radius on the northeast corner of the intersection. The lane configuration of the approaches to the existing intersection of NYS Route 25 at Factory ' Avenue / Sigsbee Road are as follows: ' I . Eastbound NYS Route 25: A left turn lane, and combined thru right turn lane. 2. Westbound NYS Route 25: A left turn lane and a combined thru right turn lane. ' 3. Northbound Sigsbee Road: A left turn lane, and a combined thru right turn lane. 4. Southbound Factory Avenue: A left turn lane, and a combined thru right turn lane. NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 10 File: SEPT20I0/TIS.doc ' Grades and Sight Distances ' The roadways in the vicinity of the project site are relatively flat and have little horizontal curvature. Therefore, no sight distance problems are present, and more than sufficient sight distance will be ' available in both directions to satisfy design guidelines and to ensure safe operation of the site driveways. 1 1 NP: 7-I1 Mattituck-28104 11 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc i 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 i i EXISTING TRAFFIC 1 FLOW CONDITIONS 1 1 1 1 NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 12 File: SEPT2010/'I7S.doc ' Traffic Volumes ' Information regarding traffic volumes on NYS Route 25 was obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation. NYSDOT maintains a continuous count station on Route 25 in Laurel, ' west of the project site. According to information provided by New York State Department of Transportation from this count station, the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) on Main Road in ' Mattituck in 2008 was 16738 vehicles per day. Note that AADT is an transportation engineering and planning term defined as the average traffic volume at a given location on any day of the year, ' including weekends. AADT is not utilized in detailed analyses, rather it is a statistic used to describe order of magnitude traffic volumes on a given facility. Due to the seasonal, recreational nature of the area, traffic volumes on the adjacent roadways are ' higher during the summer months. Based on information provided by the New York State Department of Transportation, traffic volumes on NYS Route 25 are highest during the months of ' July and August, with August being just a small amount higher than July. The counts also indicate that the weekday AM peak hour occurs between 8:00 and 9:00 AM, and the weekday PM peak hour occurs between 4:00 and 5:00 PM. On Saturday, midday peak hour traffic volumes occur between 1:00 PM and 2:00 PM. Note that the traffic volume data utilized in the detailed analyses conducted for this study were collected during August of 2009; therefore, the analysis reflects worst case conditions. In addition, since convenience markets draw a significant amount of their commerce ' from the passing stream of traffic, it has been assumed that the peak hours of the facility will coincide with the roadway peak hours. Thus, a conservation worst case scenario is presented. Copies of all the traffic volume information referenced in this document are provided in the Appendix of this report. ' Accidents Information on accidents that have occurred in the vicinity of the site during the most recent three- year period available, September 2006 through August 2009, was obtained from the NYSDOT's Accident Location Information System (ALIS). This information, summarized in Table 1, indicates NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 13 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc I Time, Period September 1,-2006'- September 1, 2007 - September 1, ~QQS- Lgcatlon August 31,:2007 August 31, 2008 August 31, 2009 Main Road from Old Main Road to 0 1 0 Factory Avenue / ' Si sbee Road Main Road At Factory Avenue / Sigsbee Road 2 6 1 ' Main Road from Factory Avenue / Sigsbee Road 0 1 1 to Ma lene Crive ' Factory Avenue from 1 0 2 LIRR to Main Road Sigsbee Road from 500' south of Main Road to 0 1 0 ' Main Road 4 Total 3 9 ' Table 1 Accident Summary ' that the accident experience on the roadway system adjacent to the proposed project for the most part was minimal. No accidents were reported to have involved vehicles entering or leaving the existing ' gas station. However, at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue, during the time period between September 1, 2007 and August 31, 2008, 6 accidents occurred, four of which were rear end ' accidents. Rear end accidents tend to be related to congested conditions, wherein motorists follow too closely, and tend to be of lesser severity than left turn or right angle accidents, for example. One accident occurred in winter, two in the spring, two in the summer, and one in the fall, so no seasonal pattern is apparent, nor was any pattern evident with regard to direction of travel or time of day of ' the accident occurrence. In addition, in the year prior to that period, only two accidents occurred, and in the subsequent one year time period, only one accident occurred at that location. NYSDOT reports ' no roadway improvements were implemented during this time period. NYSDOT calculates rates of accident occurrence for intersections based on the number of vehicles entering the intersection on an NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 14 File: SEPT2010/'FIS.doc ' annual basis. For intersections with configurations similar to the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue, NYSDOT indicates that the average rate of accident occurrence is 0.59 accidents per million ' vehicles entering (MEV) the intersection. For the subject intersection, over the three year period analyzed, the rate of accident occurrence was calculated at 0.39 accidents per MEV, significantly ' lower than the statewide average. Therefore, it must be concluded that the relatively high number of accidents occurring during the 12 month period in question is a statistical anomaly. 1 As discussed later in this report, as part of the proposed development, the applicant will provide a ' property dedication, design services and construction costs for a major improvement to the curb radius on the northeast corner of this intersection. In addition, one of the two existing driveways on Main Road serving the site will be closed, and the remaining driveway as well as the single driveway on Factory Avenue will be relocated to be as far away from the intersection as the site design will allow. In this manner, combined with the low volumes of new traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed redevelopment of the site, no detrimental impact on in the rate of accident occurrence in the ' vicinity of the site is anticipated. In fact, the improved geometry could result in a decrease as the rate ' of accident occurrence at this location. Copies of the accident data is provided in the appendix of this report. 1 1 NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 15 File: SEPT2010/T1S.doc t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SITE TRIP 1 GENERATION 1 ANALYSIS 1 1 1 NP: 7-I1 Mattituck-28104 16 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 1 ' In order to determine the amount of traffic that might be expected to be generated by the proposed development, a trip generation analysis was performed. This analysis was based on information ' contained in the report "Trip Generation", 8th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The ITE report presents data on trip making at various land uses, and is the recognized industry standard for analyses of this nature. The current site plan calls for the discontinuation of the gas station use, and the rehabilitation and expansion of the existing building to provide a 2,670 SF 7-Eleven convenience store, which will be ' open 24 hours a day. Information in the ITE Trip Generation report for Convenience Market, Open 24 Hours (Land Use Code 851) was utilized to estimate the future driveway volumes generated by ' the project. Table 2 presents the amount of traffic expected to visit the proposed redevelopment during the weekday AM and PM and Saturday midday peak hours. However, it must be noted that ' not all the traffic entering and exiting the proposed convenience market will be new traffic added to the roadway network. As previously noted, the property is developed with a gas station and a small ' convenience market that are currently operating and generating traffic. In order to establish the existing traffic volumes, traffic counts were conducted at the site driveways. 1 Weekday AMWeekday PM Saturday Midday Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour ' Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Convenience Market, Open 24 Hours g8 98 74 69 103 103 (Land Use Code 851) Existing Gas Station Traffic 28 30 38 34 53 46 1 Net New Driveway Traffic 70 68 36 35 50 57 ' Table 2 Site-Generated Traffic NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 17 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc The results of these counts are also presented in Table 2. As can be seen, the proposed convenience store will result in increases in the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site. However, it is ' critical to note that a significant portion of the trips into convenience stores is made up of pass-by trips. Pass-by trips are those trips that are on the road for another purpose, and divert to a site as part ' of that trip. That is, the trips are not specifically generated by the land use, but are traveling to or from work at another location, or are passing by the site as part of an overall shopping outing, for example, and stop at the site as part of that trip. Information presented in the ITE "Trip Generation . Handbook" indicates that up to 87% of total traffic and an average of 61% of weekday P.M. peak ' hour traffic patronizing convenience markets is already on the roadway network for another purpose. Under a related land use, Convenience Market with Gasoline Pumps (Land Use Code 853), weekday A.M. peak hour pass-by rates as high as 72%, and an average of 63% were reported by ITE. Table 3, Trip Generation Estimates - Net New Roadway Traffic, presents the estimated new traffic that will ' be added to the roadway network as a result of the proposed project, utilizing a 61% pass-by rate for all three peak hours examined. As can be seen, during the peak hours, approximately one new ' vehicle every two-to-four minutes would be added to the roadways adjacent to the site. Cr WlrQlsclaY, PM Saturday iVlla aY a Pa~c bur' F1~a& ur -Kb n..e? Izt EStsrXlt Eif#r $if ' Net New Driveway Traffic 70 68 36 35 50 57 ' Less Pass-by Trips (61 42 41 21 21 30 34 ' Net New Traffic on Roadway Network 28 27 15 14 20 23 Table 3 Trip Generation Estimates ' Net New Roadway Traffic However, in the interest of presenting a conservative worst case estimate of the potential traffic impact of the proposed project, and at the direction of the Town of Southold, the trip rates were ' recalculated using a 25% pass-by credit. Additional information on this analysis is provided in the section of this report entitled "Intersection Capacity Analyses". NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 18 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 OTHER PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS i 1 NP: 7-11 Mattimck-28104 19 File: SEPT2010frIS.doe I, ' There are two other projects located nearby that have the potential to add traffic to the roadway network in the vicinity of the project site, a 4,200 SF Chase Manhattan Bank branch and the Hudson City Savings Bank Plaza, which proposes a 3,244 SF bank branch and 9,982 SF of office space. As directed by the Town of Southold, information regarding trip generation for these two developments ' was obtained from the Traffic Impact Study for the Chase bank prepared by Atlantic Traffic and Design Engineers Inc, dated December 2009. Table 4 presents the amount of traffic estimated to be ' generated by these two projects, as obtained from the Atlantic Traffic report. Note that the Atlantic Traffic report did not provide information regarding the weekday AM peak hour, nor did it contain specific information regarding the Hudson City Savings development's trip generation. Therefore, this information was estimated using the IiE trip generation report methodology. Weekday AM Weekday PM Saturday Midday ' Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour. Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Chase Bank (1) 29 23 32 32 44 39 ' Hudson City Savings Plaza (2) 48 22 47 67 48 43 ' (1) Source: Atlantic Traffic report Dec 2009 (2) ITE Trip Generation Report. Table 4 Site-Generated Traffic Other Planned Developments This traffic has been added to the roadway network and included in the analyses performed for the purposes of this study. A copy of the Atlantic traffic report is provided in the Appendix of this ' report. NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 20 File: SEPT20I0/TIS.doc 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DIRECTIONAL 1 DISTRIBUTION 1 ANALYSIS 1 1 1 NP: 7-11 Matotuck-28104 21 File: SEPT20 I OrrIS.doc 1 1 1 In order to estimate the direction of approach and departure of vehicles entering and leaving the site after completion of the proposed project, a directional distribution analysis was performed. This 1 analysis was based on the prevailing traffic patterns on the adjacent roadway system during the peak 1 hours of activity on a summer weekday and Saturday. In this manner, the traffic patterns are reflective of those during the time when traffic volumes on the roadway are highest. A separate 1 directional distribution was developed for both the primary and pass-by portion of the site generated traffic, for the weekday AM and PM peak hours and the Saturday midday peak hour. 1 The directional distributions utilized for the proposed project are presented in Figures 4, 5 and 6 for 1 primary trips during the weekday AM and PM and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively, and Figures 7, 8 and 9 for pass-by trips during the weekday AM and PM and Saturday midday peak 1 hours, respectively. Note that the directional distributions reflect the fact that, as part of the proposed project, only right turns into and out of the site will be accommodated at the new driveway on Main 1 Road, and full turning movements being accommodated at the proposed driveway on Factory Avenue. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 22 File: SEPT2010/TMS.doc 1 9% F 9% SITE 48% j 1 43% 48% L.._.._.._.. 43% ~...J % 41% 41 48% 480/6 ? ' MAIN ROAD ¦ z% ~v ¦ O~ J 4tj ' (4 Umj Q ' FIGURE 4 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC co PRIMARY TRIPS WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR 1 1 1 1 j4z 51 % SITE 3938% L.._..~..~.. 51% ~..J 49% 49% 2% 39% i 3_ ' MAIN ROAD j Q 2% O~ J 14 IT FIGURE 5 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC co PRIMARY TRIPS WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 1 13% Q O 46% 13°o SITE ' 4C r 4,% j ~41 % 46% 44/0 44% % 41% 141%~ MAIN ROAD 2% O~ J C7 4, 7 ~Q 1 FIGURE 6 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC ' N PRIMARY TRIPS SATURDAY PEAK HOUR 1 J~ 9% ' L SITE i r 48% J/~4% 43% ~ I 1% 1% C ~ . 52% ~..J 41% 51 1% 48% _41 MAIN ROAD j Q 2% 4 O~ J 4 m4 Q C9 i FIGURE 7 ' DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC N PASS BY TRIPS WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR 1 - 1 J`~ Aga 10% O 5,°~° SITE 51% ' 11% j I 5%1 ~6% L.._.._.._.. 42% L... 49% 40% ~ 39% 45 MAIN ROAD r 1 a 2% O~ J 1 ,44/ 0 44g/ C7 4-1 1 ' FIGURE 8 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC N PASS BY TRIPS WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR j 13% ' 46% ~ 2/° SITE 50% 2% 4% /44% L..~..~..~.. 48% 44% 47% 1% 41% 44%_ MAIN ROAD 1 2% <C/ O~ J Ocm FIGURE 9 ' DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC N PASS BY TRIPS SATURDAY PEAK HOUR i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT 1 ANALYSIS 1 i NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 29 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 1 The site-generated traffic was distributed on the surrounding roadway network based on the results of the directional distribution analysis discussed previously. Figures 10, 11 and 12 present the assignment of the site-generated traffic during the weekday AM and PM and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively. The primary trips and pass-by trips are shown separately. However, it should be noted that only primary trips result in additional vehicles added to the roadway network, whereas pass-by trips are attracted from the existing stream of traffic already on the road for another purpose. As can be seen, once distributed on the roadway network, the new traffic expected to be generated by the proposed project will contribute a very small number of new vehicles to the individual intersection approaches, even based on the extremely conservative assumptions utilized in developing the projected number of new site generated trips. NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 30 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 1 i ~O Np •3(1)[4] SITE 19(28)[471 M 15(2911441 16(31)[471 1 16(25)[411 F1 (2)[31 18(29)[471 1(1)[21 MAIN ROAD j O~ J ~ 1 ~4 LEGEND: 1 XX = PRIMARY TRIPS ~2~ 61? (XX) = PASS BY TRIPS [XX1 = TOTAL TRIPS i 1 1 FIGURE 10 ASSIGNMENT OF ' o SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC 00 N COMBINED TRIPS WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR 1 1 CID 1 C.) SITE 4Q *\j (3)[41 11(23)[34] o 14(22)[36] 13;1 x)[31] 14(19)[33] 11(18)[29] ' 1(1)[2] MAIN ROAD r oQ mLEGEND: (A XX = PRIMARY TRIPS (XX) = PASS BY TRIPS [XX] =TOTAL TRIPS i ' FIGURE 11 ASSIGNMENT OF CD SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC 00 N COMBINED TRIPS WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 1 1 1 ,~z 1 SITE ,T 1(5)[61 ' 16(32)[48] 18(30)[48] 19(30)[40] 1 18(20)[461 ~1(1)[2 1 16(26)[42] 1(2)[31 MAIN ROAD r LEGEND: XX = PRIMARY TRIPS (XX) = PASS BY TRIPS [XX] = TOTAL TRIPS i 1 FIGURE 12 ASSIGNMENT OF ' o SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC N COMBINED TRIPS SATURDAY PEAK HOUR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Intersection i Capacity Analyses 1 1 1 1 NP: Mallituck 28104 File: Admin/Repons/TIS.doc 1 1 1 1 1 1 NYS Route 25 Main Road At 1 Factory Avenue 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 NP: Matti[uck28104 File: Admin/Repons/TIS.doc 1 1 1 2009 Existing Condition 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NP: Mettituck 28104 File: AdminMeports/TI$.doc ~1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst VC Intersection Main Road at Factory/Sigsbee Agency or Co. Dunn Engineering Associates Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 911012010 Jurisdiction NVSDOT Time Period Weekday AM Peak Analysis Year 2009 Existing Volume and Timing Input ' EB WB NB SEI LT TH FIT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH FIT Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 ' Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume (vph) 57 496 8 17 487 33 14 9 19 51 8 96 % Heavy Vehicles 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 Pretimed/Actuated fP/A) A A A p p P A A A 4 4 a ' Startup Lost Time 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ' Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Lane Width 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/Hour ' Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasin EB Onl EW Perm 03 04 SB Onl NB Onl 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 48.0 Ill G= G= 17.0 G= 10.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Len th C = 105.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 63 554 20 612 15 31 63 129 ' Lane Group Capacity 299 994 333 750 144 146 245 238 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.56 0.06 0.82 0.10 0.21 0.26 0.54 Green Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.16 Uniform Delay d1 13.3 12.6 15.9 24.7 43.4 43.9 38.5 40.4 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.15 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14 Incremental Delay d2 0.4 0.7 0.3 9.5 0.3 0.7 0.6 2.5 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ' Control Delay 13.6 13.3 16.3 34.2 43.7 44.6 39.0 42.9 Lane Group LOS B B 8 C D D Do D ' Approach Delay 13.4 33.7 44.3 41.7 Approach LOS B C D D Intersection Delay 26.6 Intersection LOS C ' copyright,02007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS.TM Version 5.3 Generated: 9/13/2010 4:28 PM SHORT REPORT ' General Information Site Information Analyst VC Main Road at Dunn Engineering Associates Intersection Agency or Co. Factory/Sigsbee Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 112612010 Jurisdiction NYSDOT Time Period Weekday PM Peak Analysis Year 2009 Existing Volume and Timing Input ' EB WB NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH FIT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume (vph) 60 577 46 22 606 29 19 32 19 60 27 75 % Heavy Vehicles 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A P P P A A A A A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 108 ' Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Minimum Pedestrian Time 32 3.2 3.2 Phasin EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Onl NB Only Timing G= 15.0 G= 50.0 G= G= G= 12.0 G= 8.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= ' Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Len th C = 105.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ' Adjusted Flow Rate 66 685 26 747 21 56 74 126 Lane Group Capacity 310 1097 308 784 116 123 173 174 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.62 0.08 0.95 0.18 0.46 0.43 0.72 Green Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.08 0.11 0.11 Uniform Delay d1 14.2 10.0 15.0 26.4 45.4 46.4 43.3 44.9 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.21 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.28 Incremental Delay d2 0.3 1.1 0.5 22.5 0.8 2.7 1.7 13.9 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 14.6 11.1 15.5 48.9 46.2 49.1 45.0 58.8 Lane Group LOS 6 B B D D D D E ' Approach Delay 11.4 478 48.3 53.7 Approach LOS B D D D ' Intersection Delay 33.3 Intersection LOS C Copyright ©2007 University of Flonda, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 8/17/2010 1024 AM fileWC:ADocuments and Settings\ccanzoneALocal Settings\Temp\s2kB2.ttnp 8/17/2010 ' SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst VC Main Road at Dunn Engineering Associates Intersection Agency or Co. Factory/Sigsbee Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 112612010 Jurisdiction NYSDOT Time Period Saturday Midday Peak Analysis Year 2009 Existing Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH FIT ' LT TH FIT LT TH FIT LT TH F23T Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR ' Volume (vph) 65 682 28 20 491 14 26 42 91 39 61 % Heavy Vehicles 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.71 0.71 0.87 0.87 0.87 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A P A A A A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ' Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N ' Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 32 3.2 3.2 3.2 ' [Duration asin EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Onl NB Onl 07 O8 ming G= 10.0 G= 48.0 G= G= G= 17.0 G= 10.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= of Anal sis = 0.25 C C 105.0 ne Group Capacity, Control Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ' Adjusted Flow Rate 68 739 22 543 37 91 105 115 Lane Group Capacity 343 991 227 755 144 154 245 252 ' Vic Ratio 0.20 0.75 0.10 0.72 0.26 0.59 0.43 0.46 Green Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.16 Uniform Delay d1 12.0 15.2 16.2 23.0 44.1 45.5 39.6 39.8 ' Delay Factor k 0.11 0.30 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.18 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay d2 0.3 3.1 0.8 5.8 0.9 5.9 1.2 1.3 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ' Control Delay 12.3 18.3 17.0 28.9 45.0 51.5 40.8 41.1 Lane Group LOS 8 8 B C D D D D ' Approach Delay 17.8 28.4 49.6 41.0 Approach LOS B C D D Intersection Delay 26.6 Intersection LOS C ' Copyright © 2007 Universityof Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated' 8/17/2010 1035 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ccanzone\Local Settings\Temp\s2k11A.tmp 8/17/2010 1 1 1 2012 No-Build Condition* 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'INCLUDES: 1. An increase in traffic volumes of 2.0% per year to account for normal background 1 growth. 2. The traffic estimated to be generated by the two other developments in the vicinity of the site. 1 i 1 NP: Mattituck 28104 File: Admin/RepunsrFlS.doc 1 ' SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information ' Analyst VC Intersection Main Road at Agency or Co. Dunn Engineering Associates Factory/Sigsbee Area Type CBD or Similar ' Date Performed 112612010 Jurisdiction NYSDOT Time Period Weekday AM Peak Analysis Year 2012 No Build Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB ' LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR ' Volume(vph) 60 551 8 18 542 35 15 10 20 54 8 102 % Heavy Vehicles 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A P P P A A A A A A startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ' Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 ' Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Minimum Pedestrian Time 32 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Onl EW Perm 03 04 SB ORI NB Onl 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 48.0 G= G= G- 17.0 G= 10.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= ' Duration of Anal is hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 105.0 Lane Group Ca acit , Control Delay. and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 66 614 21 679 16 33 67 136 Lane Group Capacity 258 994 304 750 144 147 245 238 ' Vic Ratio 0.26 0.62 0.07 0.91 0.11 0.22 0.27 0.57 Green Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.16 Uniform Delay d1 15.1 13.3 160 26.4 43.4 43.9 38.6 40.6 ' Delay Factor k 0.11 0.20 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.17 Incremental Delay d2 0.5 1.2 0.4 16.5 0.3 0.8 0.6 3.3 ' PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 15.6 14.5 16.4 42.9 43.8 44.7 39.2 43.9 Lane Group LOS B B B D D D D D ' Approach Delay 14.6 42.1 44.4 42.4 Approach LOS B D D D Intersection Delay 30.8 Intersection LOS C ' Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 8/17/2010 1028 AM fileWC:ADocuments and Settings\ccanzoneALocal Settings\Temp\s2kC5.tmp 8/17/2010 ' SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information ' Analyst VC Main Road at Agency or Co. Dunn Engineering Associates Intersection Factory/Sigsbee Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 112612010 Jurisdiction NYSDOT ' Time Period Weekday PM Peak Analysis Year 2012 No Build Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB ' LT TH FIT LT TH FIT LT TH FIT LT TH FIT Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume (vph) 64 656 49 23 687 31 20 34 21 65 29 80 % Heavy Vehicles 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 ' Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A P P P A A A A A A Startup Lost Time 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ' Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N ' Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 ' Phasin EB LO EW Perm 03 04 SB Onl NB Only 07 08 Timing G= 15.0 G= 50.0 G= G= G= 12.0 G= 8.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= ' Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 105.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 70 775 27 844 22 60 80 135 Lane Group Capacity 286 1097 274 784 116 123 173 174 ' Vic Ratio 0.24 0.71 0.10 1.08 0.19 0.49 0.46 0.78 Green Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.08 0.11 0.11 Uniform Delay d1 18.2 11.0 15.1 27.5 45.5 46.5 43.5 45.2 ' Delay Factor k 0.11 0.27 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.33 Incremental Delay d2 0.4 2.1 0.7 54.8 0.8 3.0 2.0 19.5 ' PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 18.6 13.1 15.8 82.3 46.3 49.6 45.4 64.7 Lane Group LOS 8 B B F D D D E ' Approach Delay 13.6 80.2 48.7 57.5 Approach LOS B F D E ' Intersection Delay 48.5 Intersection LOS D Copyright© 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 8/17/2010 10:30 AM file:HC:ADocuments and Settings\ccanzoneALocal Settings\Temp\s2kDF.tmp 8/17/2010 .mob.. ~ i ' SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst VC Main Road at Dunn Engineering Associates Intersection Agency or Co. Factory/Sigsbee Area Type CBD or Similar ' Date Performed 112612010 Jurisdiction NVSDOT Time Period Saturday Midday Peak Analysis Year 2012 No Build Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB ' LT TH FIT LT TH FT LT TH RT LT TH FIT Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR ' Volume (vph) 69 752 30 22 546 16 28 45 25 98 41 65 % Heavy Vehicles 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.87 0.87 0.87 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A P P P A A A A A A SFartup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Onl EN Perm 03 04 SB Onl NB Only 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 48.0 G= G= G= 170 G= 10.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= ' Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 105.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ' Adjusted Flow Rate 72 814 24 604 39 98 113 122 Lane Group Capacity 305 992 181 755 144 154 245 251 ' v/c Ratio 0.24 0.82 0.13 0.80 0.27 0.64 0.46 0.49 Green Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.16 Uniform Delay of 13.2 16.5 16.5 24.4 44.1 45.7 39.9 40.0 ' Delay Factor k 0.11 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.22 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay d2 4la622.1 6 1.5 8.7 1.0 8.4 1.4 1.5 PF Factor 00 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ' Control Delay 18.0 45.1 54.2 41.2 41.5 Lane Group LOS B C D D D D Approach Delay 21.4 32.5 51.6 41.4 Approach LOS C C D D Intersection Delay 29.8 Intersection LOS C ' Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated'. 8/17/2010 1037 AM fileWC:ADocuments and Settings\ccanzoneTocal Settings\Temp\s2kI2E.tmp 8/17/2010 1 1 1 2012 Build Condition* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 *INCLUDES: 1 1. An increase in traffic volumes of 2.0% per year to account for normal background growth. 1 2. The traffic estimated to be generated by the two other developments in the vicinity of the site. 1 3. The traffic generated by the proposed development. 1 1 NP: Mattitnck 28104 File: Admin/Repons/TIS.doc 1 t SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst VC Main Road at Dunn Engineering Associates Intersection Agency or Co. Factory/Sigsbee Area Type CBD or Similar ' Date Performed 112612010 Jurisdiction NYSDOT Time Period Weekday AM Peak Analysis Year 2012 Build Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB ' LT TH FIT LT TH RT LT TH FIT LT TH FIT Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume (vph) 72 551 8 18 553 35 15 11 20 67 8 102 % Heavy Vehicles 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' PH F 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A P P P A A A A A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ' Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N ' Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasin EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Onl NB Onl 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 48.0 G= G= G= 17.0 G= 10.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= ' Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 C cle Length C = 105.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay. and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ' Adjusted Flow Rate 79 614 21 692 16 34 83 136 Lane Group Capacity 251 994 304 751 144 147 245 238 ' v/c Ratio 0.31 0.62 0.07 0.92 0.11 0.23 0.34 0.57 Green Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.16 Uniform Delay d1 15.7 13.3 16.0 26.7 43.4 43.9 39.0 40.6 t Delay Factor k 0.11 0.20 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.17 Incremental Delay d2 0.7 1.2 0.4 18.5 0.3 0.8 0.8 3.3 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 16.5 14.5 16.4 45.2 43.8 44.8 39.8 43.9 Lane Group LOS B B B D D D D D ' Approach Delay 14.7 44.3 44.4 42.4 Approach LOS B D D D Intersection Delay 31.8 Intersection LOS C t Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 8/17/2010 10:32 AM file://C:ADocuments and Settings\ccanzoneALocal Settings\Temp\s2kF3.tmp 8/17/2010 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information ' Analyst VC Intersection Main Road at Agency or Co. Dunn Engineering Associates Factory/Sigsbee Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 112612010 Jurisdiction NYSDOT Time Period Weekday PM Peak Analysis Year 2012 Build Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB ' LT TH FIT LT TH FIT LT TH FIT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR ' Volume (vph) 72 656 49 23 694 31 20 35 21 71 30 80 % Heavy Vehicles 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A P P P A A A A A A Startup LOSE T imie 2.0 2.0 2.u" 2.u 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ' Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N ' Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasin EB Only -FEW Perm 03 04 SB Onl NB Onl 07 08 Timing G= 15.0 G= 50.0 G= G= G= 12.0 G= 8.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Anal Sis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 105.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ' Adjusted Flow Rate 79 775 27 852 22 61 88 136 Lane Group Capacity 286 1087 274 784 116 123 173 174 ' v/c Ratio 0.28 0.71 0.10 1.09 0.19 0.50 0.51 0.78 Green Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.08 0.11 all Uniform Delay d1 18.7 11.0 15.1 275 45.5 46.6 43.7 45.2 ' Delay Factor k 0.11 0.27 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.33 Incremental Delay d2 0.5 2.1 0.7 58.3 0.8 3.1 2.5 20.2 ' PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 19.2 13.1 15.8 85.8 46.3 49.7 46.2 65.5 Lane Group LOS 8 B B F D D D E Approach Delay 13.7 83.6 48.8 579 Approach LOS B F D E ' Intersection Delay 50.1 Intersection LOS D !I Copyright © 2007 University of Flonda, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 8/17/2010 10:34 AM 1 file://C:ADocuments and Settings\ccanzoneALocal Settings\Temp\s2k106.tmp 8/17/2010 . -b- ..a i ' SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information ' Analyst VC Intersection Main Road at Dunn Engineering Associates Agency or Co. Factory/Sigsbee Area Type CBD or Similar ' Date Performed 112612010 Jurisdiction NYSDOT Time Period Saturday Midday Peak Analysis Year 2012 Build Volume and Timing input EB WB NB SB LT TH FIT LT TH FIT LT TH FIT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR ' Volume (vph) 78 752 30 22 556 16 28 46 25 107 42 65 % Heavy Vehicles 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.87 0.87 0.87 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A P P P A A A A A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 ' Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasin EB 01 EW Perm 03 04 SB Onl NB -.11 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 48.0 G= G= G= 17.0 G= 10.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y- 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= ' Duration of Analysis (hi = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 105.0 Lane Group Capacity", ontrof Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ' Adjusted Flow Rate 81 814 24 615 39 100 123 123 Lane Group Capacity 297 992 181 755 144 154 245 252 ' v/c Ratio 0.27 0.82 0.13 0.81 0.27 0.65 0.50 0.49 Green Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.16 Uniform Delay d1 13.6 16.5 16.5 24.7 44.1 45.8 40.1 40.0 ' Delay Factor k 0.11 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.23 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay d2 0.5 5.6 1.5 9.4 1.0 9.3 1.6 1.5 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ' Control Delay 14.1 22.1 18.0 34.1 45.1 55.1 41.8 41.5 Lane Group LOS B C B C D E D D ' Approach Delay 21.4 33.5 52.3 41.7 Approach LOS C C D D Intersection Delay 30.3 Intersection LOS C ' Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 53 Generated: 8/17/2010 1038 AM fileWC:ADocuments and Settings\ccanzoneALocal Settings\Temp\s2k14Ltmp 8/17/2010 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INTERSECTION 1 CAPACITY 1 ANALYSIS 1 1 1 1 NP: 7-I1 Mattituck-28104 34 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc '1 I' ' In order to ensure that the traffic generated by the proposed project can be accommodated on the roadway network without any detrimental impact on operating conditions, and that the proposed site driveways will operate in a safe and efficient manner without undue delay for vehicles entering and leaving the proposed development, signalized and unsignalized intersection capacity analyses have ' been performed. These capacity analyses were performed utilizing software based on the methodologies set forth in the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, and utilized the traffic ' volumes previously described, and the estimates of new vehicles expected to be generated by the proposed development. ' Cinnali7 A7 In*vrSEC~i.^..^. fl r^aCi•.y,Analy3es Signalized intersection capacity analyses were conducted at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue for the weekday AM and PM and Saturday midday peak hours, utilizing signal timing and phasing information collected in the field. Simply put, the level of service for a signalized intersection is defined in terms of the average control delay per vehicle during a given peak period, and the signalized intersection capacity analysis methodology evaluates the average control delay per vehicle to determine intersection Level of Service (LOS). Control delay is influenced by several variables specific to the operating conditions experienced at the intersection. Six levels of service, from A to F, have been established as measures of vehicle delay. These levels and their related control delay criteria are summarized in Table 5, Signalized Intersections - Level of Service Criteria. NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 35 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc ' Level of Service Control Delay Seconds ervehicle) A <10.0 ' B 10.1 -20.0 C 20.1 -35.0 ' D 35.1 -55.0 E 55.1 -80.0 ' F > 80.0 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 2000 ' Table 5 Signalized inters sectiOns - Level -of Service Criteria First, the analyses were conducted to determine the existing operating conditions (2009 Existing). ' Intersection capacity analyses were then calculated for the "2012 No-Build Condition". In this examination, the 2009 Existing traffic volumes were projected to the 2012 build year using a 2.0% per year growth factor and the traffic from the other proposed developments was added to determine the total traffic that would be on the roadways at that time without the construction of the proposed ' development. The annual growth factor used was based on the results of the New York State Department of Transportation's LITP 2000 planning study and is specific to the north fork of Long Island. Then, the intersection capacity analyses were repeated to reflect the addition of traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed convenience market (2012 Build Condition). Detailed I summaries and printouts of the results of the analyses for the signalized intersection examined for this study can be found in the section of the Appendix of this report entitled "Intersection Capacity Analyses Summaries". ' The results of the capacity analysis performed, summarized in Table 6, indicate that the traffic due to the proposed development can be accommodated on the roadway network without significant ' deterioration in overall signal operations at the intersection studied. Although the development of the site will lead to an increase in traffic on the roadways serving the site, this increase is small, and ' results in an increase in total traffic volumes at the intersection of between 2 and 3%, even based on the extremely conservative assumptions utilized in estimating future site generated traffic. NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 36 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc As can be seen from Table 6, the capacity analysis results indicate that the intersection is currently operating at LOS "C" during all three peak hours examined. With the addition of the traffic estimated ' to be generated by the two other nearby developments, as well as the growth in background traffic, (2012 No Build Condition) the intersection will continue to provide LOS "C" during the weekday AM and Saturday midday peak hours, and LOS "D" will be provided during the weekday PM peak hour. The addition of traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed convenience market results in no change in LOS during any of the three peak hours, and increases in control delay of between 0.4 and 1.2 seconds per vehicle (2012 Build Condition). These extremely small increases in delay are iikciy ' to be imperceptible to motorists traveling through the intersection. Note that these capacity analyses calculations are based on the application of a 61% reduction in new site-generated traffic to account ' for the trip making characteristics referred to as pass-by trips. The 61% rate is largely substantiated in professional publications. However, at the request of the Town of Southold, the trip generation ' rates were recalculated using an extremely conservative pass-by rate of 25%, and the capacity analyses were recalculated. The results of these analyses are also provided in Table 6. Note that even utilizing this extremely conservative pass-by rate, for which no documentation exists, no change in levels of service are predicted by the analysis. 2012 2012 2012 20gs NOBkild Build Build E ikjng Cohditidn Condition Condition o Ihtersectionrrime Period 01S1s 1t1on tNote.13 (No#e 2) (2570 P00,Y) LTeraay L]r?Iay Delay ' 1tlil COQ (sec/ LOS (S06/ LOS (Sect LOS (Sec/ ~Ah) Vow Veh) veh) Weekday AM C 26.6 C 30.8 C 31.8 C 33.0 ' Peak Hour Main Road (NYS Route 25) Weekday P.M. at Peak Hour C 33.3 D 48.5 D 50.1 D 51.8 Factory Avenue Saturday ' Midday C 26.6 C 29.8 C 30.3 C 30.7 Peak Hour Note 1: Includes an increase in traffic volumes of 2.0% per year to account for normal background traffic growth. Note 2: Same as Note 1 and includes the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed redevelopment. Table 6 Summary of Signalized Intersection Capacity Analyses Results ' NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 37 File: SEPT2010/T1S.doc ' Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analyses ' Unsignalized intersection capacity analyses were performed at the proposed driveway intersections at Factory Avenue and Main Road for the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours as well as the Saturday ' midday peak hour. Unsignalized intersection capacity analyses determine levels of service based on control delay for each minor movement. LOS is not defined for the intersection as a whole. Roughly speaking, the analyses rely on a gap acceptance model, in which the number of acceptable gaps in traffic for a given movement are determined, and compared to the number of vehicles seeking to 1 utilize such gaps. Level of Service criteria are slightly different for stop controlled intersections from the criteria for signalized intersections, primarily because driver expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry greater traffic volumes and experience greater delay than unsignalized intersections. As in the signalized analyses, the 2009 Existing traffic volumes were projected to the 2012 build year using a 2.0% per year growth factor and the traffic from the other nearby developments was added to determine the total traffic that would be on the roadways at that time of the construction of the proposed development. Then the capacity analyses were conducted to ensure that the proposed access driveways can provide the service needed for vehicles entering and exiting the site, without causing ' undue delay. The results of these capacity analyses are summarized in Table 7. Detailed printouts of the capacity analyses results can be found in the appendix of this report. Note that, since capacity ' analyses conducted at the proposed site driveways must reflect 100% of the trips entering and leaving the site, no pass-by reduction was applied, and the results in Table 7 reflect the total number of trips ' that are expected to enter and leave the site after the proposed project is open and operating. Weekday A.M. Weekday P.M. ' Intersection Movement or Saturday Peak Peak Peak Approach LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Dula.' ' Factory Avenue SB Left Turn A 7.6 A 7.5 A 7.5 At Proposed Site Driveway WB Combined D 10.8 B 10.6 B 10.5 Main Road at Proposed SB Right Turn B 13.2 B 14.6 B 12.8 Site Drive ' Table 7 Summary of Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analyses Results NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 38 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 i PARKING 1 1 1 1 NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 39 File: SEPT2010/TiS.doc 1 ' Based on the requirements set forth in the code of the Town of Southold, one parking space per 100 SF of convenience store space must be provided for developments of this type. Calculations provided on the current site plan indicate that 23 spaces are required and 26 are provided. Thus, the parking provided exceeds the requirements of the Town code. ' In addition, in order to ensure that the proposed parking will be adequate to accommodate potential ' parking demand generated by the project, a parking demand analysis was conducted. This analysis made use of information provided in the report "Parking Generation", published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The Parking Generation report provides data on parking demand generated by `Jar:CRS common land uses, inciuding CGn"ver11c11Cc rriarkcts. FOr Tartu TT-- Code 0051, ' Convenience Market, the Parking Generation report indicates that 16 spaces would be required to meet demand at a convenience market such as the one proposed. Therefore, the 23 spaces proposed ' are more than sufficient to meet projected demand. ' Finally, provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act indicate that, for parking areas containing between 26 and 50 spaces, at least two spaces should be reserved for persons with handicaps. The ' current site plan for the project provides 26 spaces including two for persons with handicaps. Thus, the parking provided satisfies the requirements of the Town code and the Americans with Disabilities Act, and is expected to be adequate to meet demand. 1 NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 40 File: SEPT20 I OMS.doc 1 r r r r r i 1 r r r 1 ADDITIONAL r CONSIDERATIONS r r r 1 NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 41 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc r ' Truck Access and Circulation Information provided by the applicant indicates that several different size trucks can be expected to make deliveries to the convenience market during the course of an average week. On a daily basis, this information states that 17 foot trucks will make deliveries to the site, three times a week 24 to 26 foot long trucks will deliver beverages to the site, and twice a week, 54 foot tractor trailers will make ' deliveries to the site. Truck path templates have been overlaid on the current site plan to determine whether these different size trucks can successfully negotiate the site. The results of this site plan ' analysis are discussed in the following paragraphs. Based on the results of this analysis, it is rPenmmenried that all 1-1- ...a1cL:g deir..,ries, as well as trash collection, Lise the access driveway ' on Main Road to enter and leave the site. ' The site plan shows a 20' x 42' truck loading area on the east side of the building. An examination of the truck templates shown in Figure 13 indicates that single unit trucks will be able to enter onto the ' site via the access driveway on Main Road and back into the truck loading area. While in this area, access to several of the parking spaces located along the eastern property line will be impeded. However, since the site plan provides more than ample parking to accommodate demand, it is recommended that these spaces be reserved for employee use, so that trucks blocking access to the ' spaces does not inconvenience patrons. On leaving the site, the single unit trucks will be able to back out of the loading area into the parking lot aisle, and drive directly out of the site onto Main ' Road. Alternatively, the single unit trucks can drive onto the site and back into the loading area and then drive directly out of the site onto Main Road. Thus, the most common type of truck expected to ' visit the site can be readily accommodated by the site layout. ' The turning templates also indicate that, although the larger WB-50 tractor trailer trucks will have more difficulty negotiating the site, they can still successfully enter and leave the site, and load and ' unload without having significant impact on internal circulation as shown in Figure 14. In order to access the truck loading area after entering the site via Main Road, the larger trucks will need to encroach on several parking spaces, which is typical behavior for trucks of this size. After entering the site, the trucks can either back into the truck loading area, unload, and then drive directly out of the site onto Main Road or, depending on parking demand on site during that time of delivery, remain NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 42 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc s- N gyp.. 57 10 E 46 v0 _ le 7M ari JX - cc al'b' I~" 4 1 r F Y-a't u t t a/~ a fi~ IIIAI h , r c ,,~~rr pg e Y " s 9 g ~Iul ~FE48'57'30" IN 198.00 J~I[Ifi & IlIa- 51 ~ wa t A , G-T2 F11 I ~ ~ A,.F_F 6 RNE P DUNK {r ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C. i Z Conentting Engine,.. ri . " ea win siren ~ w.w~a, e..m,rn ngn IeJtl3g621gg 7-11 MATTITUCK FIGURE 13 SINGLE UNIT TRUCK TURNING PATH DATE SCALE UEA NO. 02117/10 1"= 50' 28104.00 r r, J, r p °*r { % z ~r flF P o ~s e di 9 ,ppp4Y 30 4t Ju_ ~ u jGgaA ilk ~1- 2175 m T 111 - _i J ! a 4,t 1 3' a E i ~i ILA~i ~3 ir.`~~ s lip J ! IEL - -~m-fi ~,na•s~so' w L _ R4Ap T -7- 4i IF" I- Ll Ii '111 1 It F r" :L DUNN 117 ;1?7 11Z k ABOIICIATES P T 4~1 coo.~uroa eoetoe ~ ~ ea nwnsr,.x .c: w.nrnpmn e..n. NViiere ~ ~ /i w ~ IBJt)Ya31eo 7-11 F MATTITUCK FIGURE 14 TRACTOR TRAILER TRUCK TURNING PATH DATE 1 SGLE OEA NO. 02117/10 1. = 50' 28104.00 ' blocking several parking spaces in the lot while unloading. Again, this is typical behavior for large trucks at developments of this kind. Finally, it must be noted that these truck turning templates tend to be very conservative, and in fact, underestimate the abilities of truck drivers to negotiate their vehicles. As previously stated, it is recommended that trucks making deliveries to the site be directed to do so via Main Road, and that all deliveries to the site, as well as trash collection, take place during non- peak hours. There are no residences immediately adjacent to the site, therefore, noise from trucks making deliveries or trash pickup should not be an issue, and by making deliveries during non-peak ' hours, if trucks need to block some on-site parking, the impact on internal circulation will be minimized. Traffic Activity at Adjacent Properties 1 The Magic Fountain Ice Cream store is located on the northwest corner of Main Road at Factory ' Avenue, across Factory Avenue from the site of the proposed convenience market. While the property has access to both Main Road and Factory Avenue, there are no formally delineated parking spaces or access driveways on either frontage. Parking is provided for three or four vehicles along the Main Road frontage of the property, and for seven or eight additional vehicles along the Factory ' Avenue frontage. Access between these two informal parking areas is prevented by the presence of a sign structure and bollards placed in the ground. There are no circulation aisles provided, rather, ' because of the size constraints of the property, vehicles enter the site and park facing the building, and upon leaving, must back out onto either Main Road or Factory Avenue. This is considered an ' undesirable condition, but it is assumed that this is a pre-existing non-conforming condition. If circulation aisles were to be provided, the number of parking spaces on the site would be drastically reduced, which might result in patrons parking along Factory Avenue or Main Road. It should be noted that accident records reviewed for this study indicate that only a single accident involving ' vehicles backing onto Factory Avenue was recorded during the three years considered in the analysis. NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 45 File: SEPT2010/rlS.doc ' At present, the site access driveway serving the existing gas station on the subject property is located opposite the Ice Cream store's parking area on Factory Avenue, thereby exacerbating this undesirable condition. Upon construction of the proposed convenience market, however, this driveway will be relocated to a point as far north of Main Road as possible, which will reduce the potential for ' conflicts with the vehicles entering and leaving the ice cream store property in this unsafe manner. Therefore, the development of the proposed convenience market will result in safer conditions at this location. It is recommended that should the opportunity arise, the Town encourage the property owner to investigate the possibility of providing additional parking for patrons of the ice cream store, ' possibly through rental or purchase of property from an adjacent property owner. In addition to the ice cream store, there is a marine related business operating from a facility north of the ice cream store. This facility also appears to have access to Main Road and Factory Avenue. ' Along the Factory Avenue frontage, a number of boats of different sizes are stored on the property, and the facility has an access driveway onto Factory Avenue. However, a number of boats are stored ' along Factory Avenue immediately behind the property line, and it appears that boat trailers access the property from any point along the frontage, due to the lack of curbs. The access driveway for the proposed convenience market will be relocated to the vicinity of the ' existing driveway across Factory Avenue. It is recommended that the Town request that the marine operation utilize the existing driveway, rather than access the property from any point along the ' frontage, to minimize driver confusion when approaching the property along Factory Avenue. ' Finally, as previously stated, the site of the proposed convenience market is surrounded on two sides by a shopping center, which has access to both Main Road east of the site and Factory Avenue north of the site. The businesses in this commercial center, including a Waldbaums supermarket, are served by a truck loading area, which is accessible from the parking area in front of the stores, and by an ' access driveway on Factory Avenue, located approximately 600 feet north of Main Road and 450 feet north of the proposed site access driveway. It has been noted that during times when the loading ' dock serving the supermarket is occupied by delivery trucks, other trucks waiting to make deliveries to the supermarket stack along both sides of Factory Avenue until such time as they are able to use the loading dock. This occasionally results in only a single lane being available for traffic on Factory NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 46 File: SEPT2010rrIS.doc ' Avenue. It should be noted that this activity takes place a considerable distance to the north of the site of the proposed convenience market, and is not likely to have any impact on the safe operation of the site, especially since it is intended that all truck deliveries to the proposed convenience market take place via the access driveway on Main Road. It is recommended that the town discuss this issue with ' the operator of the shopping center, and explore different options to address this issue. These options include staggering the delivery times at the center so as to maximize efficient use of the loading area, directing trucks waiting to use the loading dock to do so in the parking lot, or providing additional space at the loading dock so that more tracks can be accommodated. ' Radius imrovements at Main nvad at Factory Avenue As previously stated the turning radius for westbound Main Road to northbound Factory Avenue ' does not meet current NYSDOT standards, due to the alignment of Factory Avenue. Larger vehicles have been observed experiencing difficulty in executing the westbound to northbound right turn ' movement, especially when southbound left turning vehicles are queued at the stop line on Factory Avenue. In order to improve this condition and increase the turning radius, property would be required and some of the existing traffic signal equipment and above ground utilities located on this corner would need to be relocated. Although the proposed convenience market is not expected to add any appreciable amount of traffic ' to this turning movement, especially since larger trucks making deliveries are expected to do so via the driveway on Main Road, the applicant has agreed to comply with a request by NYSDOT to participate in improving this non-standard condition. Therefore, the applicant has entered into an agreement with NYSDOT whereby the applicant will dedicate the property needed to implement this ' improvement, and will provide detailed design plans for both the radius improvement and the traffic signal equipment relocation at no expense to the Town or the State of New York. In addition, as part ' of the site development, the applicant will construct the radius improvement. NYSDOT has indicated that, in light of the applicant's willingness to provide this benefit to the traveling public, they will ' provide for the relocation of the traffic signal equipment and the utilities. It should be noted that the applicant is under no obligation to provide this improvement as a condition of obtaining approval ' from NYSDOT, as it is a preexisting condition. NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 47 File: SEPT20 I OMS.doc 1 Detailed design plans have been prepared by the applicant and submitted to NYSDOT for review. Minor comments have been received on the plans, and the plans are being revised for resubmittal. A ' copy of the draft plans can be found in the appendix of this report, and the property dedication and conceptual improvement are shown on the current site plan. ' Queue Analysis on Factory Avenue Based on information provided by the Town of Southold, concern has been expressed by a member ' of the public regarding the potential for queues of southbound vehicles waiting at the traffic signal on southbound Factory Avenue to extend beyond the proposed Jripeu7ny location. This rnnrern urac ' described as "Cars making left turns onto Factory Avenue from the proposed 7-11 will cause problems when the cars are stacked at the red light and patrons block the northbound lane of Factory ' Avenue because there is not enough room to make it into the southbound lanes. In addition, this will be worse when Magic Fountain is busy." Technically, the behavior described is a violation of traffic ' law; however, it is acknowledged that it is a quite common occurrence and rarely results in enforcement action. ' The results of the intersection capacity analyses performed for the purposes of this report were ' utilized to determine the average queue expected at the southbound approach to the traffic signal. The results of this queue analysis are presented in Table 8. The values in Table 8 represent the length of queue predicted for the various peak time periods analyzed, in feet, during a red indication for southbound Factory Avenue. Results of the queue analysis indicate that the longest average queue ' expected is 94 feet, which would occur during the weekday PM peak hour during a the red interval on the signal. Since the distance from the proposed site driveway to the stop line on southbound Factory ' Avenue is slightly over 110 feet, under such conditions the queue would not extend beyond the driveway, although little storage would be available for additional vehicles wishing to join the queue. ' On these occasions vehicles wishing to leave the site to travel south on Factory Avenue would need to wait in the site driveway for the queue to clear upon initiation of the green phase for the southbound approach. Since the analyses on which the queue analysis based were conducted using extremely conservative worst case peak summer season traffic volumes, this condition is expected to rarely occur, except possible during the busiest days of the year, when similar conditions are ' common. ' NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 48 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc T~ne:eex~oaa pKSach.Lane WeekqayA11AAPea 1Nekday?PI:Peak Sa,4urdayfBk 1- 46 feet 54 feet 72 feet ' TR 82 feet 94 feet 72 feet t Table 8 Queue Analysis NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue 1 ' NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 49 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CONCLUSIONS 1 i 1 1 NP: 7-11 Matti[uck-28104 50 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 1 ' The study and traffic engineering analysis performed indicate that the proposed redevelopment of the site will not have a significant impact on traffic conditions on the surrounding roadway network in ' the vicinity of the site. While the proposed convenience market will generate some additional new traffic, the adjacent roadway network can adequately accommodate this traffic, and the site access ' driveways will operate in a safer manner than the current condition. In addition, the applicant, while under no obligation to do so, has agreed to participate in a significant improvement to the existing ' non-standard turning radius on the corner of Main Road at Factory Avenue, including property dedication, engineering design, and actual construction of the radius improvement. Thus, operating ' conditions at this location will be improved over the existing condition at a lost to the Town of Southold or the State of New York. The following points should be also noted: 1. At present, the site is served by three access driveways two on Main Road and one on Factory Avenue. Two site access driveways are proposed, one on Main Road and one on Factory Avenue, therefore reducing the number of conflict points on Main Road. In keeping with good ' access management practices, these new driveways will be located as far from the intersection of Main Road and Factory Avenue as the site layout allows. 2. The roadways in the vicinity of the project site are relatively flat and have little horizontal curvature. Therefore, no sight distance problems are present, and more than sufficient sight distance will be available in both directions to satisfy design guidelines and to ensure safe operation of the proposed site driveways. ' 3. Due to the seasonal, recreational nature of the area, traffic volumes on the adjacent roadways are higher during the summer months. Based on information provided by the New York State Department of Transportation, traffic volumes on NYS Route 25 are highest during the months of ' July and August. The traffic volume data utilized in the detailed analyses conducted for this study were collected during August of 2009; therefore, the analysis reflects worst case conditions. 1 NP: 7-11 Mattitack-28104 51 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doe 4• Accident information examined for the purpose of this study indicates that the accident experience on the roadway system adjacent to the proposed project for the most part was ' minimal. Over the three year period analyzed, the rate of accident occurrence was significantly lower than the statewide average for intersections with similar configuration to Main Road at ' Factory Avenue. ' 5. Information in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation report for Convenience Markets, Open 24 Hours, utilized to estimate the future traffic volumes generated by ' the project indicate that the proposed development will result in a small number of new trips added to the roadway network. During the weekday AM peak hour, 28 new vehicles will be added to the roadway network, 15 during the weekday PM peak hour and 20 during the Saturday midday peak. 1 6. There are two other projects located nearby that have the potential to add traffic to the roadway ' network in the vicinity of the project site, a Chase Manhattan Bank branch, and the Hudson City Savings Plaza. The traffic estimated to be generated by these two developments has been added ' to the roadway network and is included in the analysis performed for the purposes of this study. ' 7. Intersection capacity analyses were performed at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue and at the two proposed site access driveways. These intersection capacity analyses calculations were performed in accordance with the methodology set forth in the latest (2000) edition of the Highway Capacity Manual. The results of these capacity analyses indicate that ' with the addition of the traffic from the proposed development, no change in Level of Service is expected during any of the peak periods analyzed, with minor increases in approach delay. In addition, the two driveways will operate in a safe and timely manner. These analyses were ' conducted using extremely conservative worst case estimates of trip meeting to the proposed project. I' 8. Results of a queue analysis conducted on southbound Factory Avenue indicate that the longest average queue expected is 94 feet, which would occur during the weekday PM peak hour during a the red interval on the signal. Since the distance from the proposed site driveway to the stop line NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 52 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 ' on southbound Factory Avenue is slightly over 110 feet, under such conditions the queue would not extend beyond the driveway, although little storage would be available for additional vehicles ' wishing to join the queue. On these occasions vehicles wishing to leave the site to travel south on Factory Avenue would need to wait in the site driveway for the queue to clear upon initiation of the green phase for the southbound approach. Since the analyses on which the queue analysis based were conducted using extremely conservative worst case peak summer season traffic ' volumes, this condition is expected to rarely occur, except possible during the busiest days of the year, when similar conditions are common. 9. Based on the calculations provided on the site plan, code of the Town of Southold requires one ' parking space per 100 SF, or 23 spaces, for this development. In addition, information from the ITE Parking Generation Report indicates that 16 spaces would be required to meet demand at a ' convenience market of the size proposed. The current site plan indicates that 26 spaces are proposed. Thus, the parking provided exceeds the requirements of the Town Code, and will be more than adequate to meet the expected demand. ' 10. Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act indicate that, for parking areas containing between 26 and 50 spaces, two spaces should be reserved for persons with handicaps. The current site plan for the project provides 26 spaces including two for persons with handicaps. Thus, the parking provided satisfies the requirements of the Town code and the Americans with ' Disabilities Act. ' 11. It is recommended that all deliveries to the site, as well as trash collection, use Main Road to access the site, and during non-peak hours. There are no residences immediately adjacent to the site, therefore, noise from trucks making deliveries or trash pickup should not be an issue, and by making deliveries during non-peak hours, if trucks need to block some on-site parking, the impact ' on internal circulation will be minimized. Truck path templates overlaid on the current site plan indicates most common types of truck expected to visit the site can be readily accommodated by ' the site layout. The turning templates also indicate that, although larger tractor trailer trucks will have slightly more difficulty negotiating the site, they can still successfully enter and leave the ' site, and load and unload without having significant impact on internal circulation. ' NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 53 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc t 1 ' 12. Upon construction of the proposed convenience market, the site driveway on Factory Avenue will be relocated to a point as far north of Main Road as possible, which will reduce the potential for ' conflicts with the vehicles entering and leaving the ice cream store property on the west side of Factory Avenue. Therefore, the development of the proposed convenience market will result in ' safer conditions at this location than currently exist. In addition, no significant conflicts with vehicles entering and exiting other adjacent lane uses are anticipated. Thus, based on the forgoing traffic engineering analyses and investigation, it is concluded that the proposed development will have minimal impact on the transportation system. 1 1 ' ' NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 54 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX 1 1 1 1 NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 55 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 1 1 1 i i i i Intersection 1 Capacity Analyses 1 1 1 1 NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Traffic Volume 1 Data 1 1 1 NP: Mattituck28104 File: Adinin/Repons/TIS.doc 1 DUNK ENGINEERING ASSQ(;IATES ' 66 MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 FILE NAME: SAT ' TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY INTERSECTION : MAW ROAD NYS ROUTE 25 AT SIGSBEE ROAD I FACTORY AVENI)E TIME PERIOD: 54r EXISTING YEAR: 20Q9 ' 2UI DONE BY: DE/I/G HORIZON YEAR: APPROACH ' ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES E N € YYB< x l _41- M Df2NDlf1~7N August2009 26 42 23 91 39 61 _ 65 682 28 20 481 14 SATURpAY SFJ(SONAL ADJUSTMENT Fi TOt 26 . . 42 , fi g g1 6 6$2 $ °20. 481 ' 14 - - - 0.00 a . ~q z GROWTH PERCENT ; PER YEAR 2p 45 24 ° 97 41 `fi5 69 724 30 ' 21 51 ?'.r 15 2.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENTS 1) Chase Bank 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 20 0 1 17 1 2)Hudson City Bank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 ' 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 28 0 1 25 1 ' FUTURE "N0BUILQ"WITH 28 45 25 " 98 41 65 69 752 30 22 548 ` fib IOTHER DEV. SITE TRAFFIC ' Remove Gas Station, Add 1 23 1 22 25 Convenience Store PASS-BY CREDIT 61 0 0 0 14 0 0 13 0 0 0 15 0 1 ' "BUILD" TRAFFIC 28 46 25 107 42 65 - 78 752 30 22 556 16 i RUNN ENOINEE.MNd ASSOCIATES" ` 66 MAIN STREET, WES'TlHAM[pT0N BEACH- MEW YORK 11978 FILE NAME: PM TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY INTERSECTION : MAKROAD (NYS ROUTE 25 AT SIQSBEE ROAD / FACTORY AVENUE TIME PERIOD: F' it EXISTING YEAR: Dig HORIZON YEAR: ~='1111 DONE BY: DEANC APPROACH ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES t 7 iND]TIG1 L T T ` [ 7 e 1 August 2009 19 32 19 60 27 75 60 577 46~ 22 606 29 ' ~(()=EKClAY sEA<SbtAl At3JU3E(ttE~ITEAGTOR 1J 32 19. 60 Y T 50 $7 48 OOb 28 0.00 ' GROWfH PERCENT PER YEAR - " 2b - . "34 2q = 64 , 1g 20 64 6)2 4 23 84 31 2.00 t. OTHER DEVELOPMENTS 1) Chase Bank 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 0 2)Hudson City Bank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 30 0 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 44 0 0 44 0 FUTURE' "NO BUILD" WITH 20 34 2'1 J,651 29 80 64 856 49 23 687 31 ' OTHER bEV. SITE TRAFFIC Remove Gas Station, Add 2 14 2 18 17 Convenience Store PASS-BY CREDIT 61 0 1 0" 8 1 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 ' ' BUILD" TRAFFIC 20 35 21 71 30 80 72 656 49 23 694 31 DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES 66 MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 FILE NAME: L TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY INTERSECTION : MAIN ROAD NYS ROUTE 25 AT SIGSBEE ROAD/ FACTORY AVENUE ' TIME PERIOD: EXISTING YEAR: goo ' HORIZON YEAR: 2012 DONE BY: DE C APPROACH ALT X CLEARS ' INPUT VALUES ' CONDITION . I:' T L. T-' August 2009 Adjusted 14 9 19 " 51 8 96 57 496 8 17 487 w 33 WEPPYSOONAL ADJUSTMENTFACTOFi 14 9 f 5i 8 8 5] "496 8 17 , 4& 33 1 0.00 GROWTH PERCENT: F FER YEAR 15 10 2A 54` 8 102 60 526 ' ` 8 ' . Y 8 517' 35 2.00 ' OTHER DEVELOPMENTS ' 1) Chase Bank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2) Hudson City Bank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' svnronu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 FUTURE SEASONALLY ADJUSTED "N6 BUILD°'WITH 15 10 20 ! 54 8 102 60 551 8 18 542 35 OTHER DEV. ' SITE TRAFFIC Remove Gas Station, Add 2 33 2 0 29 28 Convenience Store ' PASS-BY CREDIT 0 1 0 20 1 0 17 0 0 0 17 0 61 ' BUILD" TRAFFIC 15 11 20 67 9 102 72 551 8 18 553 35 STATION: 070047 New York State Department of Transportation Page 1 of 2 Traffic Count Hourly Report ROUTE NY 25 ROAD NAME: FROM: SOUTH JAMESPORT AVE / MANOR TO: SOUND AVE MAIN RD MATTITUCK COUNTY: Suffolk DIRECTION: Eastbound FACTOR GROUP: 40 REC. SERIAL 0702 FUNC. CLASS: 14 TOWN: RIVERHEAD STATE DIR CODE: 1 WK OF YR: 12 PLACEMENT: BET S JAMESPORT & SOUND NHS: no BIN: DATE OF COUNT: 03/23/2007 @ REF MARKER: 25 07041516 JURIS: NYSDOT RR CROSSING: NOTES LANE 1: EAST 1 LANE ADDL DATA: CC Stn: HPMS SAMPLE: COUNT TYPE: AXLE PAIRS BATCH ID: R10-DOTr10cw13 COUNT TAKEN BY: ORG CODE: DOT INITIALS: TS PROCESSED BY: ORG CODE: DOT INITIALS: 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO DAILY DAILY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DAILY HIGH HIGH DATE DAYS.. nm am J TOTAL COUNT HOUR 1 T _ 2 F 3 S 4 S 5 M 6 T 7 W 8 T 9 F 10 S 11 S 12 M 13 T 14 W 15 T 16 F 17 S 18 S 19 M 20 T 21 W 22 T 23 F 486 519 519 572 615 676 654 592 366 357 336 264 218 24 S 106 42 25 33 22 50 199 290 316 410 446 525 578 630 576 575 538 485 397 342 274 270 206 128 7463 630 13 25 S 96 53 31 35 16 32 88 129 185 303 412 435 491 480 480 516 441 342 357 307 278 195 121 69 5892 516 15 26 M 33 19 13 12 27 65 283 536 419 416 406 430 418 427 512 563 611 639 459 320 301 222 139 81 7351 639 17 27 T 41 15 20 21 26 95 310 554 508 439 395 464 450 447 551 597 610 614 484 396 274 289 162 102 7864 614 17 28 W 38 29 14 29 41 83 299 535 489 419 431 436 462 469 530 645 631 584 507 419 330 269 174 88 7951 645 15 29 T 42 24 17 15 22 85 302 511 501 442 430 509 444 501 550 634 646 642 485 386 364 283 203 104 8142 646 16 30 F 43 23 18 18 26 93 336 550 498 457 31 S AVERAGE WEEKDAY HOURS (Axle Factored, Mon SAM to Fri Noon) ADT 40 22 17 20 28 87 298 523 470 423 405 452 432 449 522 594 607 603 471 370 308 259 165 91 7656 DAYS HOURS WEEKDAYS WEEKDAY AVERAGE WEEKDAY Axle Adj. Seasonal/Weekday ESTIMATED (one way) Counted Counted Counted Hours High Hour % of day Factor Adjustment Factor - 8 167 5 101 607 8% 0.973 0.870 AADT 8800 ROUTE #:NY 25 ROAD NAME FROM: SOUTH JAMESPORT AVE / MANOR TO: SOUND AVE MAIN RD MATTITUCK COUNTY: Suffolk STATION: 070047 STATE DIR CODE: 1 PLACEMENT: BET S JAMESPORT & SOUND DATE OF COUNT: 0312312007 STATION: 070047 New York State Department of Transportation Page 2 of 2 Traffic Count Hourly Report ROUTE NY 25 ROAD NAME: FROM: SOUTH JAMESPORT AVE / MANOR TO: SOUND AVE MAIN RD MATTITUCK COUNTY: Suffolk DIRECTION: Westbound FACTOR GROUP: 40 REC. SERIAL M 0702 FUNC. CLASS: 14 TOWN: RIVERHEAD STATE DIR CODE: 2 WK OF YR: 12 PLACEMENT: BET S JAMESPORT & SOUND NHS: no BIN: DATE OF COUNT: 03/23/2007 @ REF MARKER: 25 07041516 JURIS: NYSDOT RR CROSSING: NOTES LANE 1: WEST 1 LANE ADDL DATA CC Stn: HPMS SAMPLE: COUNT TYPE: AXLE PAIRS BATCH ID: R10-DOTr10cw13 COUNT TAKEN BY: ORG CODE: DOT INITIALS: TS PROCESSED BY: ORG CODE: DOT INITIALS: 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO DAILY DAILY _ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DAILY HIGH HIGH DATE DAYL.. AM T PM TOTAL COUNT HOUR 1 T 2 F 3 S 4 S 5 M 6 T 7 W 8 T 9 F 10 S 11 S 12 M 13 T 14 W 15 T 16 F 17 S 18 S 19 M 20 T 21 W 22 T 23 F 484 537 465 478 550 613 595 509 237 202 183 198 100 24 S 30 31 19 19 29 72 131 242 362 433 460 526 527 513 497 518 527 470 402 268 252 195 135 107 6765 527 12 25 S 44 21 13 16 18 38 77 160 240 335 442 474 498 518 468 519 466 410 333 274 199 146 76 40 5825 519 15 26 M 16 14 12 18 42 179 346 530 515 454 440 444 460 402 433 490 578 555 328 193 148 117 61 45 6820 578 16 27 T 17 7 21 12 44 179 351 496 555 452 413 406 472 423 461 552 631 577 333 256 206 140 69 63 7136 631 16 28 W 11 4 21 14 62 186 349 514 568 463 451 461 473 453 416 511 573 553 403 242 176 142 71 49 7166 573 16 29 T 24 9 18 16 61 176 347 512 506 456 437 467 504 469 447 496 562 589 376 272 170 155 99 45 7213 589 17 30 F 18 17 17 22 61 194 333 488 520 499 31 S AVERAGE WEEKDAY HOURS (Axle Factored, Mon SAM to Fri Noon) ADT 18 9 18 16 55 179 336 494 519 452 423 440 464 425 427 498 570 553 350 234 170 134 73 49 6906 DAYS HOURS WEEKDAYS WEEKDAY AVERAGE WEEKDAY Axle Adj. Seasonal/Weekday ESTIMATED (one way) Counted Counted Counted Hours High Hour % of day Factor Adiustment Factor 8 167 5 101 570 8% 0.973 0.870 /0U01DT I 7938 ROUTE #:NY 25 ROAD NAME: FROM: SOUTH JAMESPORT AVE / MANOR TO: SOUND AVE MAIN RD MATTITUCK COUNTY: Suffolk STATION: 070047 STATE DIR CODE: 2 PLACEMENT: BET S JAMESPORT & SOUND DATE OF COUNT: 03/23/2007 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 Accident Data 1 1 i 1 NP: Mattituck28104 File: Admin/Repotts/TIS.doc 1 4909 Factory Ave from Main Rd to Sound Ave Page 1 of 4 4909 Factory Ave from Main Rd to Sound Ave 48 a" 03545 t' i urf Ik ~ahot7 ~un~hvbt se _t 3~ Rhae PeacY b I I ~r m'y f Legend ' ? Accident Street v--. Street Name Change <all other values> r{ IN Airport SHIELD °of 0. Bus Station © College -I ~ Sr)UIhold -9L 0 Government Office -u ,i I/ ' © Hospital -S j, Institution. Hydr ography j , la Library County eoundary r 33153983 2258078 ~.3 ' f Nursing Home State Recreation r © Parking Area - NYS Campground 2 Point Of Interest State Non Recreation ' I Pubfc School City r~r I' ® Rail Station Town 33019`453 ® Retail C. enter Indian Reservation / 31934486$'1109956 ~3 f ' B Service Area Village. -f' _ p a1Y 6.1 Mhs ' https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesgr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 ' 4909 Factory Ave from Main Rd to Sound Ave Page 2 of 4 Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Da',: 101, ' Accident Verbal Description Report Page: I 4909 Factory Ave from Main Rd to Sound Ave Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 ' Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. :Harker: 25 07041528 Street: Main Rd AT INTERSECTION WITH Factory Ave 911/2006 Fri 12:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2006-31934485 ' Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3955 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: 70 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Aced Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN. UNKNOWN ' Veh :2 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3030 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 20 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Aced Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: Street: Factory Ave AT INTERSECTION WITH Sound Ave 2/9/2007 Fri 15:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2007-32103595 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 1 Type Of Accident: COLL. W/LIGHT SUPPORT/UTILITY POLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 4235 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 65 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Aced Action: AVOIDING OBJECT IN ROADWAY ' Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(r) Ref. Marker: Street: Factory Ave 140 Meters North of Main Rd 6/1412007 Thu 14:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 200732258070 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT ' Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE ' https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesgr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 4909 Factory Ave from Main Rd to Sound Ave Page 3 of 4 Date: °"4 Accident Location Information System (ALIS) 101 IO:G Accident Verbal Description Report Page:: 4909 Factory Ave from Main Rd to Sound Ave Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 ' Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: Street Factory Ave CONTINUED Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3582 State of Registration: NY ' Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 61 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Aced Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD ' Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN Veh :2 OTHER Registered Weight: State of Registration: Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 87 Sex: M Citation Issued: N ' Direction of Travel: SOUTH-WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: Street: FACTORY AVE 15 Meters North of [Route] 25 5/20/2009 Wed 16:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009.33075453 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT/ GRADE Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE ' Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3610 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 3 Driver's Age: 56 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N ' Pre-Accd Action: STARTING FROM PARKING Apparent Factors: BACKING UNSAFELY, UNKNOWN ' Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2754 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 41 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD ' Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041528 Street; [Route] 25 AT INTERSECTION WITH FACTORY AVE ' 6/1/2009 Mon 19:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: C Case: 2009-33109956 Accident Class: INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLOUDY ' Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2756 State of Registration: NY ' Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 48 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC ' Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN 1 https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesgr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 4909 Factory Ave from Main Rd to Sound Ave Page 4 of 4 Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Date: 01/25/14 ,0,a Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 4909 Factory Ave from Main Rd to Sound Ave Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 ' Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041528 Street: [Route] 25 *r*rr CONTINUED Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2875 State of Registration: NY ' Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 34 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNSAFE SPEED ' County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker Street FACTORY AVE 152 Meters North of [Route] 25 8/29/2009 Sat 12:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: C Case: 2009-33153983 ' Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: RAIN Road Surface Condition: WET Road Char.: STRAIGHT/ GRADE Light Condition: DAYLIGHT ' Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 4178 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 26 Sex: M Citation Issued: N ' Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Aced Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, UNKNOWN ' Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 4236 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: 26 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N ' Pre-Accd Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING Apparent Factors: PAVEMENT SLIPPERY, FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesqr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 ' 4909 Marlene Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Pagel of 2 4909 Marlene Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd 3 r Y. I Legend r" A Accident Street - Street Name Change <all other values { 11 Airport SHIELD m ' a Bus Station C r yj306890 © College t JI " V,z rim~n t .,ff.,~e - -L' 0 11 tf70 i0 l' © Hospital --.g j Institution Hydrography` Q Ubrary County Boundary III Nurs ing Home State Recreation © Parking Area - NYS Campground M Point of Interest State Non Recreation 7 ' t Public School city fin ® Rail Station ® Town ® Retail C enter Indian Reservation ij Service Area L_1 Village CY O 0,03 OD5NIei I I ' https:Halis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesgr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 ' 4909 Marlene Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Page 2 of 2 Date: °"2` 25/ 0: Accident Location Information System (ALIS) 1 10:2, Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 2 4909 Marlene Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041528 Street: Main Rd AT INTERSECTION WITH MarleneLn 612112007 Thu Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2007.32306890 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 ' Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: UNKNOWN Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: UNKNOWN Road Surface Condition: UNKNOWN Road Char.: UNKNOWN Light Condition: UNKNOWN Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE ' Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3069 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 46 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: UNKNOWN Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N ' Pre-Accd Action: UNKNOWN Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN Veh :2 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 5482 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 38 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: UNKNOWN Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN ' Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN i https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesqr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 ' 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Page 1 of 8 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave 1 48 323261543121757 # e 33155762 4745; L1Pf _Ik. Q1JtG.i7` $ . 3244481 07 79 Legend A Accident Street ' Street Name Change - call other values i P774770 ® Airport SHIELD 386898 Bus Station - C fr, , "rf'4hE1 63999G Q College -I ~ ~~8P5 F Government Office -li r © No Pitdl S f 3269341 'iG995o 1934485 i 1 In5t7ution Hydrography " (tf Library L~ County Boundary ff f Nursing Home State Recreation ` 0 Parking Area NYS Campground ffi Point Of Interest State Non Recreation 72716 f' t Public School City. ' IS Rail Station t°I Town i 7,3.982925 ® Retail C.ente+ Indian Reservation 3198284+,Ae Q Service Area Village ~ f ! c ans a~~ ores https://alis,dmv.state.ny.us/lesqr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Page 2 of 8 Date: Accident Location Information System (ALIS) 1w 10:0; Accident Verbal Description Report Page:I 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available that 8/31/2009 County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker 25 07041526 Street: Main Rd AT INTERSECTION WITH Old Main Rd 10/21/2006 Sat 15:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2006-31982847 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 ' Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE ' Veh :2 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3404 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 50 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N ' Pre-Accd Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, UNKNOWN Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2549 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 27 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD ' Apparent Factors: FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041526 Street: Main Rd AT INTERSECTION WITH Old Main Rd ' 10/13/2006 Fri 16:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2006-31982925 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: OTHER ' Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3049 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 56 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY, UNKNOWN Veh :2 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NJ Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 25 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, REACTION TO OTHER UNINVOLVED VEHICL County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041528 Street: MAIN RD 96 Meters North of OLD MAIN RD 6/28/2008 Sat 16:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 3 Extent of Injuries: BBC Case: 2008.32672716 Accident Class: INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE 1 1 https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesgr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 1 ' 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Page 3 of 8 Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Date: 01/25/1( 10:0', Accident Verbal Description Report Page:: 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 ' Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041528 Street: MAIN RD CONTINUED Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3247 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: 20 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING Apparent Factors: DRIVER INATTENTION, FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY ' Veh :2 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 5500 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 3 Driver's Age: 58 Sex: M Citation Issued: N ' Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041528 Street: Main Rd AT INTERSECTION WITH Marlene Ln 6/21/2007 Thu Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2007-32306890 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: UNKNOWN Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: UNKNOWN Road Surface Condition: UNKNOWN Road Char.: UNKNOWN Light Condition: UNKNOWN Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3069 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 46 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: UNKNOWN Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N ' Pre-Accd Action: UNKNOWN Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 5482 State of Registration: NY ' Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 38 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: UNKNOWN Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041528 Street: Main Rd AT INTERSECTION WITH Factory Ave ' 9/112006 Fri 12:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2006.31934485 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: CLEAR ' Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3955 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: 70 Sex: F Citation Issued: N ' Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN 1 1 https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesgr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 ' 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Page 4 of 8 Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Date: 01/25'0` lo:o; ' Accident Verbal Description Report Page 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 ' County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041528 Street: Main Rd CONTINUED Veh :2 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3030 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 20 Sex: M Citation Issued: N ' Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN ' County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041528 Steel: [Route] 25 AT INTERSECTION WITH FACTORY AVE 611/2009 Mon 19:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: C Case: 2009-33109956 ' Accident Class: INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface ConC lion: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition. DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE ' Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2756 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: 48 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN Veh :2 CARAVAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2875 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 34 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N ' Pre-Aced Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNSAFE SPEED County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: [Route] 25 AT INTERSECTION WITH SIGSBEE RD 7/1812008 Fri 21:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 4 Extent of Injuries: CCCC Case: 2008-32693416 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh A CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NJ ' Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 44 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: SOUTH-WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN ' Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY Veh :2 CARAVAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3951 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 4 Driver's Age: 47 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesgr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 1 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Page 5 of 8 °a`e:o"o-, Accident Location Information System (ALIS) to 1007 Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: [Rouse] 25 30 Meters North of Factory Ave 9/2/2008 Tue 17:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2008-32793825 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3792 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: 47 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3451 State of Registration: NY ' Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 44 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: GLARE, DRIVER INATTENTION County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: [Route] 25 37 Meters South of MARLENE LN 5/17/2008 Sat 21:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: A Case: 2008.32639990 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 1 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH PEDESTRIAN Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc, of Ped/Bicycle: PED/BICYCLIST NOT AT INTERSECTION Action of Ped/Bicycle: CROSSING Veh :2 PEDESTRIAN Registered Weight: State of Registration: Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 14 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: NOT APPLICABLE Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: NOT APPLICABLE Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, PEDESTRIAN'S ERROR/CONFUSION Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 4221 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: 69 Sex: M Citation Issued: N ' Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, NOT APPLICABLE County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041530 Sheet: MAIN RD 11/2212008 Sat 15:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: C Case: 2008-32847453 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 1 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH DEER Traffic Control: NONE ' Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesqr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Page 6 of 8 Date:°"0-1 Accident Location Information System (ALIS) 10 :o; Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 Complete Accident data from N'YSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041530 Street MAIN RD CONTINUED Veh A CARNAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 5701 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 47 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: ANIMAL'S ACTION, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Sornhold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041530 Street: Main Rd AT INTERSECTION WITH Bay Ave 4/14/2007 Sat 18:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2007-32175786 ' Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: RIGHT TURN (AGAINST OTHER CAR) Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :2 TRUCK Registered Weight: 80000 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 44 Sex: M Citation Issued: Y Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING RIGHT TURN Apparent Factors: OTHER LIGHTING DEFECTS, UNKNOWN Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3197 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 27 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Aced Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, PASSING OR LANE USAGE IMPROPERLY County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041530 Street: MAIN RD 7118/2009 Sat 12:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-33165762 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 3 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :2 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3757 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 3 Driver's Age: 34 Sex: F Citation Issued: N ' Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, UNKNOWN ' Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3028 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 56 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY, DRIVER INATTENTION 1 https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesqr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Page 7 of 8 1 Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Date mnsn` 100; Accident Verbal Description Report Page: t 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Data fn this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 ' County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041530 Sheet: MAIN RD CONTINUED Veh CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3157 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 82 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, NOT APPLICABLE County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041530 Street: STATE HWY 25 62 Meters North of Marlene In 9/2512008 Thu 18:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2008.32774770 ' Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Pod/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :2 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2528 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 67 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY, UNKNOWN Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2548 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 54 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING RIGHT TURN Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Market 25 07041530 Street: Main Rd AT INTERSECTION WITH Bay Ave 8115/2007 Wed 13:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2007.32326154 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: STOP SIGN Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3075 State of Registration: NY ' Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 20 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN ' Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY, UNKNOWN Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3647 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 52 Sex: M Citation Issued: N ' Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN 1 t https:Haiis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesgr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Page 8 of 8 Accident Location Information System (ALIS) oae:01/25/If 70:0. Accident Verbal Description Report rage: ' 4909 NYS 25 from Old Main to Bay Ave Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 Complete Accident data from NYSDM V is only available thru 8/31/2009 ' County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041531 Street: IRoutel 25 54 Meters South of BAY A VE 7/3/2008 Thu 11:01 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 2 Extent of Injuries: CC Case: 2008-32707379 Accident Class: INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: UNKNOWN Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :2 OTHER Registered Weight: State of Registration: AL Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 25 Sex: F Citation Issued: Y Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N ' Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, UNKNOWN Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2239 State of Registration: NY ' Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 16 Sex: F Citation Issued: Y Direction of Travel: SOUTH-EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041531 Street: [Route] 25 207 Meters North of MARLRNE LN 11/25/2007 Sun 12:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: C Case: 2007-32444811 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: CLEAR 1 Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3986 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 53 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN ' Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3027 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 82 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: DRIVER INATTENTION, FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY I https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesqr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 1 4909 Sigsbee Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Page 1 of 6 ' 4909 Sigsbee Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd ' 324886 . - - 37 $cuttnoer 326727 1982938 1jdj lk F7v~rr~s~ Legend r' • Accident Street ' Street Name Change <all other values a'# %2427238 Airport SHIELD o Bus Station C College -I S'n J1i ~Le 3133878 Government Office - U © Hospital - S ' j Institutive ` Hydrography ryv `2y9 © Library i.. County Boundary u. f Nursing Home State Recreation 'o 0 Parking Area - NYS Campground q 3}. ffi Point Of Interest -State Non Recreation X Public School City ' ® Rail Station ® Town 2875 753 ® Retail Center Indian Reservation B Service Area AJ Village ' o o.rrs.. - - oe urn https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesqr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 4909 Sigsbee Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Page 2 of 6 Date: o,/ Accident Location Information System (ALIS) 10 I :IF Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 1 ' 4909 Sigsbee Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 Complete Accident data from nYSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 ' County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: Main Rd 3 Meters North of Sigsbee Rd 10/18/2006 Wed 12:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2006-31982930 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 ' Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3417 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: 56 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N ' Pre-Aced Action: OTHER Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPLICABLE Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3140 State of Registration: NY ' Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 22 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Aced Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: DRIVER INATTENTION, NOT APPLICABLE County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: Street Sigsbee Rd 406 Meters North of Peconic Bay Blvd 1214/2006 Mon 04:01 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2006-32075753 II, , Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: RAIN Road Surface Condition: WET Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED 1 Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3961 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: Sex: Citation Issued: Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: PARKED Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPLICABLE N Veh 2 OTHER Registered Weight: State of Registration: Num of Occupants: 0 Driver's Age: Sex: Citation Issued: Direction of Travel: UNKNOWN Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: UNKNOWN Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: MAIN RD 3 Meters North of SIGSBEE RD 10114/2007 Sun 15:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2007-32428788 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesqr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 4909 Sigsbee Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Page 3 of 6 Date:O"1` Accident Location Information System (ALIS) 10: 10:1£ Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 4909 Sigsbee Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 8131/2009 ' County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: MAIN RD -*"-CONTWUED Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2735 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 19 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY Veh :2 OTHER Registered Weight: State of Registration: Num of Occupants: 0 Driver's Age: Sex: Citation Issued: Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Aced Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING Apparent Factors UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: SIGSBEE RD 685 Meters North of PECONIC BAY BLVD 11/16/2007 Fri 17:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2007-32427238 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 1 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH DEER Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE ' Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 4423 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 3 Driver's Age: 30 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: ANIMAL'S ACTION, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: MAW RD 3 Meters North of SIGSBEE RD 12/18/2007 Tue 12:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 2 Extent of Injuries: CC Case: 2007-32480637 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :2 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 17950 State of Registration: NY ' Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 27 Sex: M Citation Issued: Y Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING ' Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 4357 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 38 Sex: F Citation Issued: N 1 Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY, UNKNOWN https:Halis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesgr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 4909 Sigsbee Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Page 4 of 6 Accident Location Information System (ALTS) Da e:°1/10i1f lOaE Accident Verbal Description Report Page:. ' 4909 Sigsbee Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 ' County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: MAIN RD 3 Meters North of SIGSBEE RD 5/10/2008 Sat 17:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 200832644433 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :2 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3071 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 3 Driver's Age: 57 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2864 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: 35 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: MAIN RD 3 Meters North of SIGSBEE RD 5/11/2008 Sun 15:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2008.32644432 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3991 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 64 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, NOT APPLICABLE Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2950 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 67 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES DISREGARDED, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: MAIN RD 3 Meters North of SIGSBEE RD 6130/2008 Mon 10:01 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2008-32672712 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Pod/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE 1 https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesqr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 4909 Sigsbee Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Page 5 of 6 Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Date: °'n5"` loaf Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 4909 Sigsbee Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: MAIN RD CONTINUED Veh :1 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3925 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 79 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING RIGHT TURN Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: MA Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: 24 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N ' Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN. UNKNOWN ' County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: 25 07041529 Street: [Route] 25 AT INTERSECTION WITH SIGSBEE RD 7/1812008 Fri 21:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 4 Extent of Injuries: CCCC Case: 2008.32693416 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE ' Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NJ Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 44 Sex: F Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: SOUTH-WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN ' Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY Veh :2 CARMAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3951 State of Registration: NY ' Num of Occupants: 4 Drivers Age: 47 Sex: M Citation Issued: N Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD ' Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: Street: SIGSBEE RD 609 Meters North of Peconic Bay Blvd 7/412009 Sat 16:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: C Case: 2009-33133878 ' Accident Class: INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 1 Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH BICYCLIST Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Condition: DRY Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: PED/BICYCLIST NOT AT INTERSECTION Action of Ped/Bicycle: CROSSING Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2908 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivel's Age: 67 Sex: F Citation Issued: N ' Direction of Travel: NORTH-WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, TURNING IMPROPER I htips://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesqr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 4909 Sigsbee Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Page 6 of 6 Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Date 0125'1` 10:1F Accident Verbal Description Report Lase: 4909 Sigsbee Rd from Peconic Bay Blvd to Main Rd Data in this report covers the period Sep 01, 2006 - Aug 31, 2009 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 8/31/2009 County: Suffolk Muni: Southold(T) Ref. Marker: Street: SIGSBEE RD CONTINUED Veh :2 BICYCLE Registered Weight: State of Registration: Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 50 Sex: M Citation Issued: N ' Direction of Travel: NORTH-WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, PEDESTRIAN'S ERROR/CONFUSION 1 1 https://alis.dmv.state.ny.us/lesqr/MapReport.aspx 1/25/2010 2012 Build Condition* 25% Pass-By* t i 1 1 1 1 i 1 *INCLUDES: 1. An increase in traffic volumes of 2.0% per year to account for normal background growth. ' 2. The traffic estimated to be generated by the two other developments in the vicinity of the site. 3. The traffic generated by the proposed development, based on application of a 25% ' pass-by credit. NP: 7-I1 Mattituck-28100. File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc ' General Information SHORT REPORT Site Information 1 Analyst VC Intersection Main Road at Factory/Sigsbee Agency or Co. Dunn Engineering Associates Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 9110110 Jurisdiction NYSDOT Time Period Weekday AM Peak25% Pass By Analysis Year 2012 Build I' Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB ' LT TH RT LT TH FIT LT TH FIT LT TH FIT Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 O 1 1 p Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR ' Volume (vph) 82 551 8 18 563 35 15 12 20 79 10 102 % Heavy Vehicles 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 EF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 /Ac tuated (P/A) A A A P P P A A A n 4 n Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ' Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 ' Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 ' Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 32 32 32 Phasin EB On[ EW Perm 03 04 SB Onl NB Onl 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 48.0 G= G= G= 17.0 G= 10.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Len ih C = 105.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination ' EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 90 614 21 703 16 35 98 138 Lane Group Capacity 243 994 304 751 144 148 245 239 ' v/c Ratio 0.37 0.62 0.07 0.94 0.11 0.24 0.40 0.58 Green Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.16 ' Uniform Delay d1 16.3 13.3 16.0 27.0 43.4 44.0 39.4 40.7 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.20 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.17 Incremental Delay d2 1.0 1.2 0.4 20.5 0.3 0.8 1.1 3.4 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 17.3 14.5 16.4 47.5 43.8 44.8 40.5 44.1 Lane Group LOS 8 B B D D D D D Approach Delay 14.9 46.6 44.5 42.6 ' Approach LOS B D D D Intersection Delay 33.0 Intersection LOS C Copyright02007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 9/1312010 4:31PM i ' SHORT REPORT General Information site information ' Analyst VC Intersection Main Road at Factory/Sigsbee Agency or Co. Dunn Engineering Associates Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 9110110 Jurisdiction NYSDOT Time Period Weekday PM Peak 25% PB Analysis Year 2012 Build ' Volume and Timin Input EB WB NB SB ' LT TH FIT LT TH RT LT TH FIT LT TH FIT Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR ' Volume (vph) 78 656 49 23 700 31 20 36 21 76 31 80 % Heavy Vehicles 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 ' Pretimed/Actuated (Pi A A A P P P A A A A A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 ' Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasin EB Onl EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 Timing G= 15.0 G= 50.0 G= G= G= 12.0 G= 8.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis firs = 0.25 Cycle Len th C = 105.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination ' EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 86 775 27 860 22 62 94 137 Lane Group Capacity 286 1097 274 784 116 123 173 174 ' We Ratio 0.30 0.71 0.10 1.10 119 0.50 0.54 0.79 Green Ratio 767 0.67 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.08 0.11 0.11 ' Uniform Delay d1 19.1 11.0 15.1 275 45.5 46.6 43.9 45.3 FDelay Factor k 0.11 0.27 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.33 ental Delay d2 0.6 2.1 0.7 61.9 0.8 3.3 3.5 21.0 ctor 1.000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1000 1.000 l Delay 15.8 89.4 46.3 49.9 474 66.3 Group LOS B B B F D D D E Approach Delay 13.8 872 49.0 58.6 ' Approach LOS B F D E Intersection Delay 51.8 Intersection LOS D Copyright 0 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HGStTM Version 5.3 Generatetl: 9/132010 4:32 PM ' SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information ' Analyst VC Intersection Main Road at Factory/Sigsbee Agency or Co. Dunn Engineering Associates Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 9110110 Jurisdiction NYSDOT Time Period Saturday Midday Peak25%P8 Analysis Year 2012 Build ' Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB ' LT TH RT LT TH FIT LT TH FIT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR ' Volume (vph) 86 752 30 22- 565 16 28 46 25 116 42 65 % Heavy Vehicles 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.87 0.87 0.87 ' Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A P F, P A A A A A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Pod/Bike/RTOR Volume -7-7-7- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 p Lane Width 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N O N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasin Esishrs EW Perm 03 04 SB Onl NB Only 07 0g Timing G= 48.0 G= G= G= 17.0 G= 10.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Anhire .25 Cycle Length C = 105.0 Lan e Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination ' EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 90 814 24 625 39 100 133 123 Lane Group Capacity 291 992 181 755 144 154 245 252 ' We Ratio 0.31 0.82 0.13 0.83 0.27 0.65 0.54 0.49 Green Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.16 Uniform Delay d1 74.0 16.5 16.5 24.9 44.1 45.8 40.4 40.0 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.23 0.14 0.11 ' Incremental Delay d2 0.6 5.6 7.5 10.1 1.0 9.3 2.5 1.5 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 14.6 22.1 78.0 35.0 45.1 55.1 42.9 41,5 ' Lane Group LOS B C B D D E D D Approach Delay 21.4 34.4 52.3 42,2 ' Approach LOS C C D D Intersection Delay 30.7 Intersection LOS C Copyright o 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS.TM Version S3 Generated: 9/13/2010 4.37 1 I L1 1 1 1 NYS Route 25 Main Road 1 At 1 Site Access Driveway 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NP: Mattituck 28104 File: Admin/Repoas/TIS.doc 1 i 1 2012 Build Condition* 1 1 1 1 1 i i i 1 1 "INCLUDES: 1 1. An increase in traffic volumes of 2.0% per year to account for normal background growth. 1 2. The traffic estimated to be generated by the two other developments in the vicinity of the site. 3. The traffic generated by the proposed development. 1 1 NP: Mattituck 28104 1 File: Admin/RepoRs/TIS.doc 1 ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st VC Intersection Main Road at Site Driveway enc /Co. Dunn En ineedn Associates udsdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 112812010 nal sis Year 012 Build Condition ' nal sis Time Period Weekda AM Peak Hour Project Description Proposed 7-11 East/West Street: Main Road North/South Street: Site Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ahicle Volumes and Adjustments Me or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 648 608 47 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 648 0 0 608 47 ' (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 [RE dian Type Undivided ' Channelized 0 0 nes 0 1 0 0 1 0 nfiguration T TR stream Si nal 0 0 nor Street Northbound Southbound vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R olume veh/h 47 I Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 a 0- Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 FIT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Dela , Queue Length. and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 47 ' (m) (veh/h) 484 c 0.10 ' FDelay 0.32 13.2 F:4 B )13,2 B Copyright O 2007 University of Ronda, All Rights Reseived HCS+Ta Version 5.3 Generated 215/2010 3:16 PM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ' General Information Site Information P nal st VC Intersection Main Road at Site Drivewa enc /Co. Dunn Engineering Associates urlsdlction Town of Southold Dale Pertormed 112812010 nal sis Year 2012 Build Condition ' [Analysis Time Period Weekda PM Peak Hour j Proect Description Proposed 7-11 East NVest Street: Main Road North/South Street: Site Drivewa Intersection Orientation: East-West t cl Period hrs : 0.25 ' ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' L T R L T R Volume veh/h 656 748 29 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 656 0 0 748 29 ' (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles C 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration T TR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R olume veh/h 33 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 33 ' Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N ' Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 ' Configuration R Dela Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 33 ' (m) (veh/h) 408 c 0.08 ' 95% queue length 0.26 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.6 LOS B ' Approach Delay (s/veh) 14.6 Approach LOS B Copyright 02007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+im Version 5.3 Generated' 2/5/2010 3'.16 PM ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ' General Information Site Information Mimed VC Intersection Main Road at Site Driveway Dunn En ineerin Associates udsdiction Town of Southold 1/28/2010 nal sis Year 012 Build Condition I[A eriod Saturda Midda Peak Hour Project Descri lion Pro osed 7-11 East/West Street: Main Road North/South Street: Site Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 or Street Eastbound Westbound ' [Pe,k-Hour hicle Volumes and Adjustments vement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' L T R L T R ume veh/h 752 594 42 Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ny Flow Rate, HFR 0 752 0 0 594 42 Psrnent Heavy 'Vehicles u 0 Median Type Undivided ' IT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration T TR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 33 Peak-H our Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Houdy Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 33 ' veh/h e Prcent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N ' Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 ' onfiguration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R ' (veh/h) 33 C (m) (veh/h) 495 c 0.07 ' 95% queue length 021 Control Delay (s/veh) 128 LOS B pproach Delay (s/veh) 12.8 pproach LOS B Copyrtght® 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS.I- Version 5.3 Generated'. 2/5/2010 3-.17 PM I 1 1 1 1 1 Factory Avenue 1 At 1 site Access Driveway 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 NP: Mattimck 28104 File: Admin/Repons/TIS.doc i ~i 11 1 2012 Build Condition* 1 1 1 it i 1 1 i 'INCLUDES: 1 1. An increase in traffic volumes of 2.0% per year to account for normal background growth. 1 2. The traffic estimated to be generated by the two other developments in the vicinity of the site. 3. The traffic generated by the proposed development. 1 1 NP: Mattituck28104 File: Adrnin/Repons/T1S.doc 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ' General Information Site Information nal st VC Intersection Facto Ave at Site Driveway lAgency/Co. Dunn En ineerin Associates urisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 112812010 nal sis Year 012 Build Condition nal sis Time Period Weekda AM Peak Hour Pro'ect Description Proposed 7-11 East/West Street: Site Driveway North/South Street: Facto Avenue [Hourly ersection Orientation: North-South tud Period hrs : 0.25 hicle Volumes and Ad'ustments or Street Northbound Southbound vement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' L T R L T R ume veh/h 146 44 0 159 ak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Flow Rate, HFR 0 146 44 0 159 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 I 0 Median Type Undivided FIT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT ' U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 6 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R olume veh/h 44 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1400 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 44 0 5 ' veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 ' Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound ' Movement 1 4 7 6 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR ' (veh/h) 0 49 C (m) (veh/h) 1396 688 /c 0.00 0.07 )5% queue length 0.00 0.23 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 10.6 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 10.6 pproach LOS B ' Copyright® 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TV Version 5.3 Generated'. 2/5/2010 3'.15 PM I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ' General Information Site Information [Analyst VC Intersection Facto Ave at Site Drivewa enc /Co. Dunn En ineerin Associates urisdiction Town of Southold Date Pertormed 1/28/2010 nal sis Year 012 Build Condition nal sis Time Period Weekda PM Peak Hour Pro'ect Descri lion Pro osed 7-11 EaslNVest Street: Site Drive wa North/South Street: Facto Avenue Intersection unentation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and As ustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 121 37 8 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 121 37 8 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type Undivided ' IT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT ' U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R olume veh/h 34 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 34 0 4 ' Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N ' Storage 0 0 FIT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length. and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound ' Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR ' (veh/h) 8 38 (m) (veh/h) 1434 843 /0 0.01 0.05 ' 95% queue length 0.02 0.14 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 9.5 LOS A A ' pproach Delay (sA/eh) 9.5 pproach LOS A Copyrigh[O 2007 University of Floritla, All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.3 Generated 21512010 316 PM 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ' General Information ite Information nal st VC Intersection Facto Ave at Site Drivewa lAgency/Co. Dunn En ineerin Associates udsdiction Town of Southold Date Pertormed 1/28/2010 nal sis Year 012 Build Condition ' nal sis Time Period Saturda Peak Hour Pro act Description Pro osed 7-11 East/Vest Street: Site Drivewa North/South Street: Facto Avenue y Orientation: North-South tud Period hrs : 0.25 ' ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 121 48 10 157 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) 0 121 46 10 157 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 _ Median Type Undivided V RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration TR LT ' U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 6 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R olume veh/h 49 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 O 49 0 8 veh/h ' Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N ' Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Dela , Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound ' Movement 1 4 7 6 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 10 57 C (m) (veh/h) 1421 687 /c 0.01 0.08 5% queue length 0.02 0.27 Control Delay (s/veh) 7 6 10.6 LOS A B ' pproach Delay (s/veh) 10.6 pproach LOS B Copyright 0 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Hcs..- Version 5.3 Generated: 2/5/201D 3:16 PM 1 L I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II II 1 Roadway Improvement 1 Plans 1 1 1 1 NP: Mattituck 28104 File: Admin/Repons/TIS.doc 1 a a~ a a» a a~ a a a a a ¦a a a a a 7-11 CONVENIENCE STORE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25 MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK NYSDOT CASE NO. 01-099P e~ LOCATION MAP SGIE: t-~ qW' AUGUST 11, 2009 SHEET NO. DWG. NO. DESCRIPTION DUNN 1 - TITLE SHEET EM ENGINEERING 2 MD-1 TYPICAL SECTION AND MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 3 RP-1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN ASSOCIATES, P. C. 4 PM-1 PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING PLAN Cmeul6ng Engineers 5 TSP-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN SIGNAL NO. 83.6 NYS ROUTE 25 AT FACTORY AVEASIGSBEE RD. 66 Main Stro6L 6 MPT-1 MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC PLAN r h-pm semi,, N.Y. 11ffM (631) 288-7198 WTEG- 1. P L WORK GHALL BE P RFm"m INTpTOXACLVRppNCE WITryrXE B+BTPNpg N SPEGIFIGTIONS 6iKEXEW YORK ABIES-pI VMIES UPipx I-K STATE pEppRTMENT ENi EF iRpNGR^R. V WBNBB dY PNUPOBF?FLLLDEPfX PAYENcNI ¢gppOBEO6AEWA,%MEq EEBPiEPLWs I. TAGlGWT911gLL BE plpCm 9FM1VEEN E4ERYq$pWLT IIR. VMES PNO rXEJOIM9 BETWEEN NEW ANO EVBTINGASgVLT PpVFMEXi PROFpBEp WIDEXMG mess IxnccoaawcemwlTEM w+.mm. EKISi1NC Row. UN! veAIES PBCPUBm PNOPOBEDDEaCPnpl .EBMAT%IN O6ff SFIM _ VRflIES E%ISTNG SIOEWAIK AREA - ENSTIXG PUNRR n Z a¢WX¢P,LMM¢„,-Ia ~,o ~mrExBmoxa ~.Law¢uWx. Xaa..,.o:.m¢,Pww r,<K ro.. Irex.a+w,W IeLE Xo,6 m L 7. -1 Fw~ml Mw .IMM t- ~mxaarcuXx T rv W A 1 BlfaumK PwvE l6uaua5 ¢uN[.n¢x,mxmrv Bo,mamx ,wrt6wwvlMUFrawwp, N4 .,rtxmm..., TYPICAL SECTION (LOOKING NORTH ALONG FACTORY AVE) CONCRETE W RB TVPE VF-150 DETAIL fIF]AWOGaO%OS BPEGAL HOlE9 FWf PB BINOERµO MIXGEBAiN LE4E APPL GIELE PL rnwx NBB KOTEB, I. PIA YOACEDOEDM IOED iBBITUMINOUBJOIMFILLFRSN .a, x5nwreeuaFmnm ATLPT E+NpL9.LLW. UNAOE rtFxwMa,uss 1LNOTHCFAWTHEWBB ERECIRB.6 :E am¢vyTO THE OW9:ANp ATKLFGT PCa MQ AAl)PP9MgtVMW; /S CPRIEUBY wl~..,:P®¢alawa~++M xLx:•ore TXE NGEeER. .m¢o.+Kma[i+vWlnmLO6awwi w.v~ePm~RaKV®xn GM.K.aX<.ExTEw.sWN.MaxX,P+rwx. WBw B laMExuK BEmox,~ aoFi.FMwu,o,4x,mx LMLns,oMauv, ®,vx wFNgYPNre FWWHIYNI®TVRC Mu[(M1a,l ",iptnlxn nee,ae¢WU,.ora¢srtmn Mw ~ ~BBI~~J NYSOOT CA8E NO. D1-09BP uryn MMUTO „JOlinlu LO ~xsre¢w om vM~n 6m¢ DDNN n-min +x;nI WW wepfmx~oumE m xKwn ,mmm $ga T~gS P.C av,ICm,[awwa wvE Faum a~," _ xrF +a u,L~a[Aa~W~xa pa j wq xa,Im¢ rvaMEeLaoivv BEMwew manaswmx¢Few SECnO NBC ~aa~NBwKxw.oaruu Tra~~ixA~iaE~wMCm~,E~x6 J 6m~1 1:-MM M°F"il.°xi:u"°BLwmB°"'L„a¢r,re':.P. `vp SIDEWALK CURB RAMP TYPE4 +-11 WA RWCK +.o~m~iELa ne~~a~rv~ ~ a a r¢ Nmi:a xmmsme xau[wnrwnrr Fn,rp a~ wwxmaew+xLwma c a~ wlw~Ain ~iNOw,wvfrom ~q rvcwimw~'~Aaw, assvmnxxrMMaB BNb¢is Xm, IEEE a~"vw.Ixn ¢,I v..L TVPII-MEC DUA KxownF.xm _m MISGELLANEDUS DETAILS TYPE a SIDEWALK CURB RAMP DETAIL ElapnON Dn a~ mWMWOTOxvBm,naMema, Nn¢wyt¢¢uxammrvnE Wawaa. FMyBE UBEOIN BiMIGMORGURYFDCLNB9EL110115 .DT Tp sruE 2 m fi On. Ve JW e 4"i:»: o _ la muy V Per eat" Y vw I n°N ~i. SEE9RE PIAN8Po8W?8K 4~ ~ ~ ..e..e v S .E PTPPoPOeEOeIIE.VY£d5. «..m I SHOPPING CEH / P Knn I / 8C« 0 MAIN "mRO, R. 25)xn I -oMNnx.. nawmun WSOOTC ENO. l-0 u,m„rtxmm M IEGEW: OIINN ® PPo ENGINFFALLYG . cePm aEOV uExr ~ A3SOtlATPS. PsC NDT~ McX'wNwara,rtwmNRlrtRMx[mw,wvmN,01. m,.~NUnF~F `I Mtxl n~~ el[w PflP OSEO .~Mrv„w NO.vu SUEWNN DYNmeumm~ltilne uwetunaw,omemx,a.KmnFe. wevnu'w,wr wlw[ 6 Ix,Wa~aa rt 7-11 MpTT}tNM ,wxsmnmxmenmm®IAM,IiEOFlI[ `Si9.AxYCxmlIrtNIW.PEwl0.tlM vrtmrolinxss dx~nnn[wwmle ROMWRV IMPROVEMENT PIAI f~vnvxxai ,m orwx+.wm ,mvmx.maMw¢Ewmuv®uwmwa,urcwwwnw mm~wivo'u,w,m m~uumu 3 f ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! rw SPEED J~ UNIT = o'..wa"" 1 35 wn~ _ A s A ~ SEE BITE PUIIBFORNYY+ U FTPRCPP9E09REILCE39. irs wxu ~ - :4~.. 4 p f eXCPPIN - CENTER mmmA \ uem~i~~ rwwrna ly FILiCWY AVE uam.~.icmmv~ ~.awo \ a°- MAIN ROA-D- R. 25 2p• - SPEED &MEE RD UNIT NO n NPALENEu m` 30 SIO PNXG FAST r/ 1== 3 ANY TIME NO lz~t STOPNNO . ANY Q orwwexrauv.,sm.aa TIME H WSWTCASEN0.01d99P OUNN 0a'GQieER ASSOCIAT&S,PL` w'~M.Ym~vn lop'W iM] 7-11 IAATlTVJ K PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING PLW 4 SEQUENCE TABLE-SIGNAL NO. 83.6 FACES P 1,2 44 S, ] 6 9 10 12.13 5 O T9XO 0 Q N A R E © © J r ~x=w I~ sz[ 12" 12" 12" 12" 12° 12" 12" - I Q / mmae~-u~~ I mP + m5 R G R R R R DW Ob / 02 + 06 G R G R R R R pw / n a I snir p R R R G R R OW ~04~ / ly 0 R a R R R c c Dw+ Z- MSH Y R 1' R R ft R - ~4Z- ~ 03 ~ A d e waxure[0svarwue'wcsmlrcuamuarr.vgrtwux•wp~xcrvnnwa m°XAimxl / / 13.. mrw¢xssnwormaruuuwaxem. rxcxnooraocwrxrricmmw / / rox_ CNOPPI]R TE. csxw.u,rxczrty,crmsw~n[ mrss r / euuxwmxA' e 0@ ARR I _ oElE, m s uww w, n _ LW fr' 4w ® uu_wpr-HENA G~ eamw.nwunx evw+urm. sewuuxwxpnrwrvnrm ru aor- W es M. / p ® 06 MAIN - - -ROAD- (S.R. 25 Derm¢ - eew.oo.oxw.xwuPrm.aEOIaN, enx.R:n Wi~"m`°RS~~'"e+w® - ~ ~ / ® O wsxi~. r ~ _ rwnxw:¢x..e \ j 1 _ I .n.mn BE asixw e..or.c.o. rx ooE.xo.n...vRwwx ym~/ I S .rP.w....r~..'a IMME waxNwraE.e.~o-mwo..~ or~Rn~ ~ U rxew.rET , HEE.e.w wx PE]a~ any ~~v oa...r.n.urx.x¢.ew-`IEEu,-N,E, ma.ai NYSDOT CASE NO.01-0 W es ma IT7Ewmexaw_.... swvutxrm mx..__H,_ D11NN'. . ASSOCGTE4°P'C. ew.nm Nw.Mw~nn imm HE I ruxr ]-ii MATTRIICK EH. 2 TRM'FICSIGNALPLAN ® 816NAL NO. W,G ...-EMMIC NEE E, I 5 9 9 I -d N-1 11.1 sus.nmaoAo-ann3u-awwuouw+v~wrrnmu•a.w~xmnaaxnaaumreeaxmxunaaw~ox NYId~db JOIIJ3LOLd ONVNtl 3D 3'~NlM3INItlW N'OfW MWL vievxmx ® gwnaWl9uAlxYlo4wi,m~usir®w nwafAMn miw r ~o® i uvxav+a~eMVx xaumavu, ~ Aoa r9+wsAauainms,i saw.udnsn unaaamail~x~~d~ Oaf N3e~Nxa~xavix uwa isxuauwouw8.wauotnvN3WF .•~'a'svveiossv ~ ~aauanwA ..o~a.,rn,Axe~~.aa ow~mewoNa ~.«,u.x.... nv..xxna~a.x,A~o,~afmx ,x.. NNna ~ ~..~~re~xaa. I ,m•u•~ ~,,,~~,..r .mm~.u mv»b~xxma.,a„wwuuwaa„• tl 10 mM8 1m9AN vie . 3amwinammmuawruxaznm,moosoexxafxmnaaraaimre~ouwuxvaao v.nvN W e dwrx. arvNry~rtnnx m 3vW0~vf . waAmxumemuxuxa°aeawnx~oxx oa, nw avaAmnrou3eo, auamwn rewuvuums xv¢xwuouam L ura~e+xnvw,xmm~mux~xoewu~A xwofcowuu.xa~ muraw~i CIN3031 N ~ _ ^IS rcOn`~imve'o 6 _ y NI _ ~ SZ '8'SS OY08. _ ~ NI g ~ _fa_. - 'Q - of _ qo Ir a s a.n~x,x t r 1 1 1 Atlantic Traffic Report 1 1 1 1 NP: 7-11 Mattituck-28104 File: SEPT2010/TIS.doc 1 2002 Orville Drive North ' Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 ATLANTIC TRAFFIC 631.738.1919 631.738.1177 fax ' & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. aide@atlantictraffic.com TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ' FOR ' JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. PROPOSED CHASE BANK WITH DRIVE-THRU SERVICE SECTION 143, BLOCK 3, LOT 33.2 10300 MAIN ROAD (NYS RT. 25) MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 11952 dr CHARLES D. OL O, P.E., P OE YA NY ense No. 087356 DEC - 8 2009 ' `;PRAM A. Fr~ O . ' j PROJECT GINEER a Revised December 4, 2009 November 5, 2009 ATDE Project No. AN09026 ' N:\2V AN09W N\ p.r,AANM6 TNm)2-0409.doc\FF/yp Other Office Location: 35 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, WARREN, NEw JERSEY 07059 908.769.5588 TRAFFIC 8c TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, SITE PLANNING & ROADWAY DESIGN CONSULTANTS 'www.atlantictraffic.com INTRODUCTION Atlantic Traffic & Design Engineers, Inc. (ATDE) has prepared this analysis to examine the future traffic impact of the proposed Chase Bank with drive-thru service. This document is intended to address the typical traffic analysis requirements of the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) and Town of Southold. The subject site is located along Main Road (NYS Rt. 25), approximately 300 feet east of Marlene Lane in Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, as shown in appended Figure 1. The property is currently a vacant lot The proposed development involves the construction of a new 4,200 square foot Chase Bank with drive-thm service. The future access configuration proposes a full-movement driveway along Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) aligned with the existing shopping center driveway. In addition, a westbound left-turn lane is proposed to accommodate the westbound ingress movement to the Chase Bank. The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) issued its approval of the application and site access plan on August 4, 2008, and based on recent discussions with the NYSDOT Permit Engineer, this approval remains valid to date. This study identifies the nature of site traffic increases, which could potentially occur as a result of the construction of the proposed Chase Bank. Additionally, this study addresses the ability of the site to safely and efficiently accommodate the anticipated traffic demand. This analysis thueforc includes the following elements: • A review of the existing roadway conditions and traffic volumes in the vicinity of the site; • Projection of the traffic volumes expected to be generated by the Chase Bank with drive-thm service, including an identification of the traffic drawn from the adjacent traffic stream and identification of "new" traffic to the area; • An analysis of existing and future roadway and site driveway operations; • A review of the Site Plan focusing on the proposed site access, parking layout, and circulation patterns; and • Recommendations and conclusions. ATLANTICTkAmc PAGE I & DrsiGN Axcuacros, We i 2009 EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site is located along Main Road (NYS Rt. 25), approximately 300 feet east of Marlene Lane in Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, as shown in appended Figure 1. The property is currently a vacant lot. ' The subject property is designated as Section 143, Block 3, Lot 33.2 and has approximately 150 ' feet of frontage along Main Road (NYS Rt. 25). The subject property is located in the "B" Zoning Distnct and is surrounded by --trolls commercial uses, . addition to the Mattltuck Pla.....Q.I:C.. nb~ ' Center located across from the subject site on the north side of Main Road (NYS Rt. 25). EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS ' Main Road (NYS Rt 25) is under the ownership and jurisdiction of the NYSDOT. In the ' vicinity of the subject. property, Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) has a general east/west orientation and provides one (1) travel lane in each direction and separate turn lanes at key intersections. Shoulders are provided along both sides of the roadway, sidewalks are provided along the west side of the roadway to accommodate pedestrian travel, and the pavement and striping appear to be in good condition. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is 30 miles per hour. It should be noted that Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) changes to a 40 mile per hour roadway west of the subject site. Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) provides westbound access to the Long Island Expressway (LIE) (I-495) and ' eastbound access to Orient Point, which is at the end of the North Fork, as well as various residential communities and commercial uses. ' Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road is under the jurisdiction of the Town of Southold and has a north/south orientation in the vicinity of the site with a posted speed limit of 30 miles pet hour. The roadway provides (1) travel lane in each direction, with turn lanes at key intersections. On 1 Factory Avenue (north of Main Road [NYS Rt. 25]), sidewalk is provided on the east side of the roadway and parking is not provided along both sides of the roadway. On Sigsbee Road (south of ' Main Road [NYS Rt. 25]), sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway and parking stalls are provided along the west side of the roadway. On both roadways, shoulders are not provided and ' the pavement and striping appear to be in fair condition. Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road provides ® ATLANTIC TRAFFIC PAGE 2 ' & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INc access to residential and commercial uses, as well as a beach dub at its southerly terminus at the Long Island Sound (approximately 0.6 miles south of the subject intersection). Marlene Lane is under the jurisdiction of the Town of Southold and has a general north/south orientation with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. In the vicinity of the site, the roadway provides one (1) travel lane in each direction, and on-street parking is not provided in the vicinity of the subject site. Shoulders and sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway to accommodate pedestrian travel and the pavement and striping appear to be in fair condition. Marlene Lane provides access to primarily commercial and residential uses and reaches its northerly , terminus at Main Road (NYS Rt 25) opposite the westerly shopping center driveway. The easterly shopping center driveway, located across Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) from the proposed Chase Bank driveway, provides full -access to the shopping center to supplement the ~l ingress and egress left-turn restrictions at the westerly shopping center driveway. Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) meets Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road to form a four-legged signalized intersection approximately 400 feet west of the subject site and operates with four (4) phases under the jurisdiction of the NYSDOT. All approaches to the intersection provide one (1) exclusive left- turn lane and one (1) shared through/right-turn lane. Crosswalks are provided at the Factory Avenue southbound approach, as well as the Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) westbound approach, to accommodate pedestrian mobility. Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and Marlene Lane/westerly shopping center driveway meet approximately 90 feet west of the subject site forming a four-legged unsignalized intersection with two-way STOP control at the northbound and southbound approaches. The westbound approach provides one (1) exclusive left-turn lane and one (1) shared through/right-tum lane and the eastbound approach provides a shared through/right-turn lane. The southbound approach provides a shared through/right-turn lane and the northbound approach provides a shared left- turn/through/right-turn lane. ATLANTIC TRAFFIC PAGE 3 1 & DESIGN ENGINEERS, ING I EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES To examine the existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the subject property, manual turning movement counts were conducted during the weekday midday, weekday evening, and Saturday ' midday peak periods at the following locations: ' • Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road ' • Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and Marlene Lane/westerly Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center driveway • Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and easterly Mattimck Plaza Shopping Center driveway ' Specifically, manual turning movement counts were conducted on Tuesday, August 18, 2009 ' from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.; and on Saturday, August 22, 2009 from 11:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. The results of the traffic counts indicate that there are distinct hours during the periods of study when traffic experiences its highest level. Based on the traffic count information, the weekday midday peak hour occurred from 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m., the weekday evening peak hour occurred from 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., and the Saturday midday peak hour occurred from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. The existing peak hour volumes are summarized on appended Figures 2 through 4, respectively. Traffic volumes at other times of the day are generally lower than during the study peak hours. This is primarily influenced by the commuting trips made during the weekday midday and weekday evening period and shopping trips made during the Saturday midday peak period. The higher traffic volumes on the roadway system during peak traffic hours result in available excess capacity being at ' a minimum. As a result, these time periods are typically the focus of a Traffic Impact Analysis. ' ANALYSIS OF EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES A Level of Service and Volume/Capacity Analysis was conducted for the study intersections and ' shopping center driveways using HCS+ Sq*are (Version 5.2), which is based on methodologies contained ® ATLANIICTRAFFIC PAGE 4 ' &DMGHEvciNEMS Ixc. in the Hzghway Capacity Manual (2000), published by the Ttansportation Research Bcard.t This type of analysis is performed to gauge the operational state of traffic activity and to identify any areas of excessive delay or congestion. The HCS+ summary printouts are included in the Technical Appendix. , Several factors are used in the Highway Capacity Analysis to model the actual conditions found in the field. The peak hour factors are calculated based on the turning movement counts and are applied to the hourly volume on each approach to generate the peak fifteen-minute volume within the peak hour. The , input volumes are then adjusted to reflect the critical fifteen-minute demand over the course of the peak hour, otherwise known as the peak flow rate. The percentage of heavy vehicles on the adjacent roadways ' was incorporated into the Highway Capacity Analysis based on field counts and observations. A conservative 2% heavy vehicle rate was applied at the shopping center and site driveways as minimal. truck traffic to and from the site was observed during the field studies. The traffic signal was field-timed on several occasions during the peak hours and the prevailing timing parameters were utilized in the analysis. The signalized intersection of Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road is calculated to operate at overall Level of Service D during the weekday midday and overall Level of Service C during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours. The unsignalized intersection of Main Road (NYS Rt 25) and Marlene Lane/westerly shopping center driveway is calculated to operate at acceptable Level of Service C or better during all the study peak hours. The existing easterly shopping center driveway is calculated to operate at acceptable Level of Service D or better during all peak periods. ,I I See Technical Appendix for Volume/Capacity and level of Service description. , ATLANTicTRAFFic PAGE 5 &DESIGN ENGmms, TNc i 'I PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS The next step in the analysis procedure is to project the volume of future traffic that would be generated as a result of the proposed Chase Bank with drive-thru service. For the purpose of this analysis, complete project approval, construction, and occupancy are assumed to occur within two ' (2) years. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation projections for the proposed development were prepared on the basis of reseatch data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the 81h Edition of Tni Generation, 2008. Using this publication as a reference source, the trip generation was calculated in ' accordance with Land Use Code 912: "Drive-In Bank." Table I presents the projected trip generation for the proposed Chase Bank during the weekday midday, weekday evening, and Saturday midday peak hours based on ITE calculations. ' TABLE I ITE TRIP GENERATION PROPOSED 4,200 SF DRIVE-IN BANK ' Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Midday 57 55 112 Evening 54 54 108 Saturday 58 53 111 ' A significant portion of the site-generated traffic is projected to be "pass-by" in nature, as diverted movements into the site from adjacent flows of traffic (i.e., one stop made in a series of linked "errand-type" trips to multiple retail locations, or made by a commuter on the way to work or home). The average peak hour pass-by trip percentage for drive-in banks is 47% during the evening ' peak hour, as found in ITE's DO Generation Handbook, 2n11 Edition, June 2004. ITE data indicates that pass-by rates as high as 64% occur during peak hours of bank operation. To provide a ' conservative analysis, a 40% rate was used for weekday midday and evening time periods, and a 25% rate has been utilized for the Saturday peak hour. ATLANTIC TRAFFIC PAGE 6 ' &DESIGN FNGmms, INc. Table II shows the site-genetated traffic for the proposed bank in terms of newly generated traffic and pass-by traffic. TABLE II i ITE TRIP GENERATION WITH CONSIDERATION OF PASS-BY TRIPS MIDDAY PEAK HOUR EVENING PEAK HOUR SATURDAY PEAK HOUR ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL NEW F23 32 66 32 32 64 44 39 83 PASS-BY 23 46 22 22 44 14 14 28 TOTAL II 57 I 55 ! 112 y 54 54 108 58 53 i 111 N TRIP DISTRIBUTION The site-generated traffic attributed to the proposed Chase Bank has been assigned to the adjacent roadways based on the existing travel patterns identified from the traffic counts collected at the intersections of Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road, Main Road.(NYS Rt. 25) and Marlene Lane/westerly shopping center driveway, and Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and ~I easterly shopping center driveway, as well as the uses in the vicinity of the site. The distributions of "new" and "pass-by" traffic are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. The corresponding site- generated traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 7 through 9 ("new") and 10 through 12 ("pass- by") for the weekday midday, weekday evening, and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively. The ! "new" traffic volumes were surcharged onto the "pass-by" traffic volumes to show the total site- generated traffic volumes, which are illustrated in Figures 13 through 15, respectively for each peak hour studied. Please note that negative values indicate "pass-by" traffic. i ATLANTIC TRAFFIC PAGE 7 ,I & DESIGN FNGR0FRS,, INC 2011 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS BACKGROUND GROWTH ' It is recognized that traffic routinely fluctuates along various State and County roadways, as well ' as local streets, and varies not only day-to-day, but also on a monthly and yearly basis. It is expected that as development continues in the vicinity of the site, traffic may, be expected to increase (though ' nominally) on a regular basis. It is anticipated that complete project approval, construction, and occupancy would occur within two (z) veats. As a result minimal (if any') additional "background" traffic growth can be anticipated with such a short build-out. However, in order to perform a conservative analysis, and to account for future traffic growth in the general vicinity of the subject ' site, the existing traffic volumes on the study roadway system were increased by a 1.8% annual growth rate compounded annually for two (2) years to develop the 2011 future "base" traffic volumes. This rate was provided by the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) for areas located on the North Fork of eastern Long Island. ' OTHER AREA DEVELOPMENTS The NYSDOT and the Town of Southold were contacted to determine if there were any recent development approvals which would contribute to traffic growth along the subject roadway system. According to the respective Departments, there is an application for a Hudson City Savings Bank ' Plaza located 0.25 miles east of the subject site. To accurately determine the additional traffic associated with the roadway network, we have obtained the Traffic Impact Study, conducted by ' Eschbacher VHB, from the Town of Southold and have incorporated it into our analysis. The analysis indicates that most of the traffic associated with the bank would be drawn from Main Road (NYS Rt. 25), which would add volume to the study intersections included within this Traffic Impact Analysis. Please note, the Traffic Impact Study for the proposed Hudson City Savings Bank Plaza does not provide site-generated traffic volumes for the Saturday midday peak hour. To provide a conservative analysis, out office used the 8th Edition of ITE's Di Generation to obtain trip generation volumes for the Saturday midday peak hour for a 3,244 square foot "Drive-In Bank," Land Use Code 912, and a 9,982 square foot "General Office Building," Land Use Code 710. Using 'ATLANTIC TRAFFIC PAGE 8 ' _ &DESIGNR%GrraEEns,INC the trip distribution provided by Eschbacher VHB, we were able to establish the site-generated volumes added to our subject intersections associated with the Hudson City Savings Bank Plaza. ~I i. Based on consultations with Ms. ISsisty Wisner of the Town of Southold, a 7-Eleven convenience store is proposed at the northwest comer of Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and Factory ¦I Avenue/Sigsbee Road. The proposed convenience store traffic has been added to this Traffic Impact Analysis as part of the No-Build analysis. The traffic projections were calculated utilizing ITE Land Use 851 "Convenience Market (Open 24 Hours)" in Trip Generation. The convenience store would generate 147 total weekdav middav peak hour trips, 145 total weekday evening peak hour trips, and 212 total Saturday midday trips. Please note, ITE recommends a 50% pass-by credit for a convenience store use. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Based on out research with the Town of Southold and the NYSDOT, there are no future roadway improvements planned in the vicinity of the subject site that would influence traffic conditions along Main Road (NYS Rt. 25). FUTURE NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES The 2011 future No-Build traffic volumes were calculated by adding the 2011 future "base" traffic volumes to the potential trip generation volumes associated with the Hudson City Savings Bank Plaza and 7-Eleven convenience store. These volumes are shown in appended Figures 16 through 18 for the respective peak hours. ANALYSIS OF FUTURE NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES I i A Level of Service and Volume/Capacity analysis was also conducted for the 2011 future No- Build weekday midday, weekday evening, and Saturday midday peak hour traffic volumes at the subject intersection and driveways. The signalized intersection of Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road is calculated to continue to operate at existing Levels of Service during the study peak hours in the ' No-Build condition with the exception of the westbound through/tight-tum movement. This ATLANTIC TRAFFIC PAGE 9 ' &DEsIGN ENGmEms,. INC ' movement is calculated to increase from Level of Service E to F during the weekday midday peak ' hour and increase from Level of Service C to D during the weekday evening peak hour. These increases are primarily attributed to the additional traffic generated by the proposed Hudson City ' Savings Bank, 7-Eleven, and the background traffic growth. ' The unsignalized intersection of Main Road (I YS Rt. 25) and Marlene Lane/westerly shopping center driveway is calculated to continue to operate at existing Levels of Service during the study peak hours with the following exceptions: during the weekday midday peak hour, the southbound ' approach is calculated to increase to Level of Service C and the northbound approach is calculated to increase to Level of Service D. During the Saturday midday peak hour, the westbound approach ' is calculated to increase to Level of Service B and the southbound approach is calculated to increase to Level of Service C. A 95th percentile queue length of less than two (2) vehicles would be ' anticipated, which can be accommodated on-site. ' The easterly shopping center driveway is calculated to operate at existing Levels of Service with the following exceptions: during the weekday midday and Saturday midday peak hours, the ' southbound approach is calculated to increase to Level of Service D. During the weekday evening peak hour, the southbound approach is calculated to increase to Level of Service E. The 951h percentile queue length would be less than three (3) vehicles which can be accommodated within the driveway throat depth without impeding on-site circulation. FUTURE BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES ' The 2011 future Build traffic volumes were established by surcharging the total additional site- generated traffic volumes onto the 2011 future No-Build traffic volumes. The resulting 2011 future Build volumes are shown on Figures 19 through 21 for the weekday midday, weekday evening, and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively. ' ANALYSIS OF FUTURE BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Volume/Capacity and Level of Service analyses were conducted for the future Build peak hour ' traffic volumes at the study intersection and driveways along Main Road (NYS Rt. 25). Tables 11 through X provide a comprehensive Level of Service and delay comparison under the Existing, No- ATLANTICTRAFFIC PAGE 10 ' &DPSIGN Ericw is, INe- 1 1 Build, and Build conditions at the signalized intersection and driveways during the weekday midday, weekday evening, and Saturday midday peak hours. , TABLE II COMPARATIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) TABLE , MAIN ROAD (NYS RT. 25) & FACTORY AVENUE/SIGSBEE ROAD WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Lane Group Existing No-Build Build EB Left B18.0) B(19.5) B 19.5 EB Thro h/Ri ht C 21.2 C(24.6) C 25.7 WB Left Q25.4) C(26.6) C(27.0) WBThrou h/ ht E'S7.u' F(91.4) F"99.v' SB Left C(32.9 C 32.9 C 32.9 SB Thro h/Ri ht C 34.3 C(34.5) C(34.5) r NB Left D(45.4) D(45.5) D 45.5 NB Throu h/Ri ht E(65.9 E(73.6) E 4.7 Overall D(38.2) D 51.1 D(54.8) - Ell (Eastbound) and WB (Westbound) lane groups = Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) - NB (Northbound) lane group = Sigsbee Road - SB (Southbound) lane group = Factory Avenue - - Delays are specified in seconds and are shown in parentheses. TABLE III j COMPARATIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) TABLE MAIN ROAD (NYS RT. 25) & FACTORY AVENUE/SIGSBEE ROAD WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR Lane Group Existing No-Build Build , EB Left B 13.5 B(17.0) B(17.9 EB Throu h/Ri ht A 8.8) A 9.7 A 9.9 WB Left B 15.0 B 15.1 B 15.2 WB Through/Right Q32.9) D(44.9) D 49.3 D 47.2 SB Left D(46.9) M4 SB Through/Right E 56.9 E 60.3 NB Left D(46.0) D 46.0 NB Thro h/Ri ht D (48.D D 48.6 Overall C(25.3) I C(30.9) C 32.9 ¦ - Ell (Eastbound) and WB (Westbound) lane groups = Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) - NB (Northbound) lane group = Sigsbee Road ' -SB (Southbound) lane group = Factory Avenue - Delays are specified in seconds and are shown in parentheses. A'PLANTIC`Il1AITIC PAGE 11 , &DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC TABLE IV ' COMPARATIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) TABLE MAIN ROAD (NYS RT. 25) & FACTORY AVENUE/SIGSBEE ROAD SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR ' Lane Group Existing No-Build Build EBLeft B16.4 B18.2 B18.8 EB Through/Right C(22.8) C(25.4 C 26.8 ' WB Left C L22.9 C 23.2 C(23.5) WB Through/R. ht D(37.9) 1)(463) D(50.7) ' SB Left D(37.2) D(37.3) D 37.4 SB Throu h/Ri ht D(37.6) D(37.7) D(37.7) NB Left D(40.7) D(40.7 - D(40.7) NB Throu h/Ri fit D(43.0) D 43.3 D 43.4 Overall C 30. C(34.5) D(36.7) - EB (Eastbound) and WB (Westbound) lane groups = Main Road (NY$ Rt. 25) - NB (Northbound) lane group = Sigsbee Road - SB (Southbound) lane group = PactoryAvenue - Delays arc specified in seconds and are shown in parentheses. TABLE V COMPARATIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) TABLE MAIN ROAD (NYS RT. 25) & MARLENE LANE/WESTERLY SHOPPING CENTER DRIVEWAY WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Approach Existing No-Build Build ' Westbound A(9-4) A(9.7) A 9.8 Northbound C(22.7) D 28.7 D(30.4) Southbound B 14.5) C(16.5) C(16-9) - WB (Westbound) lane group = Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) ' - NB (Northbound) lane group = Marlene Lane - SB (Southbound) lane group = Westerly shopping center driveway - Delays are speed in seconds and are shown in parentheses. TABLE VI COMPARATIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) TABLE MAIN ROAD (NYS RT. 25) & MARLENE LANE/WESTERLY SHOPPING ' CENTER DRIVEWAY WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR ' Approach Existing No-Build Build Westbound A 9.3 A 9.6 A(9.7 Northbound Q17.0) C(19.3) C 20.0 ' Southbound C(16.!) C(18.2) C(18.8) - WB (Westbound) cane group = Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) - NB (Northbound) lane group = Marlene Lane - SB (Southbound) lane group = Westerly shopping center driveway ' - Delays are specked in seconds and are shown in parentheses. ATLANTIC TRAFFIC PAGE 12 ' &DEsic.N ENGumas,lNc TABLE VII COMPARATIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) TABLE MAIN ROAD (NYS RT. 25) & MARLENE LANE/WESTERLY SHOPPING CENTER DRIVEWAY SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Approach Existing No-Build Build Westbound A 9.8 B 10.0 B 10.2) Northbound Q20.4) Q29.9) Q24-1) Southbound B ]3.8 C 15,2 C(15.6) - WB (Westbound) lane group = Main Road (NYS Rt 25) - NR (Northbound) lane group = Marlene Lane - SD (Southbound) lane group = Westerly shopping center driveway - Delays are specified in seconds and are shown in parentheses. TABLE VIII COMPARATIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) TABLE MAIN ROAD (NYS RT. 25) & EASTERLY SHOPPING CENTER DRIVEWAY WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Approach Existing No-Build Build Eastbound A(9.5) A 10.0 A(9.9) Westbound A(9.6) Northbound - - - C(23-4) Southbound C(23.1) D(33.3) E 40.8) - EB (Easthound) and WE (Westbound) lane groups = Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) - NR (Northbound) lane group = Marlene Road - SB (Southbound) lane group = Easterly shopping center driveway - Delays we specified in seconds and are shown in parentheses. TABLE IX COMPARATIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) TABLE MAIN ROAD (NYS RT. 25) & EASTERLY SHOPPING CENTER DRIVEWAY WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR ENorthbound pproach Existing No-Build Build astbound B(10.1) B(10.7) B(10.6 estbound - - - A(9.5) D(27.4) uthbound A 25.9 E(36.1) E(44.0) - EB (Eastbound) and WB (Westbound) lane groups = Main Road (NYS Rt. 255 - NB (Northbound) lane group = Marlene Lane - SB (Southbound) lane group = Easterly shopping center driveway - Delays are specked in seconds and we shown in parentheses. i m ATLANTIC TRAFFIC PAGE 13 _ &DESIGN ENGmERS,INc_ TABLE X COMPARATIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) TABLE MAIN ROAD (NYS RT. 25) & EASTERLY SHOPPING CENTER DRIVEWAY SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Approach Existing No-Build Build Eastbound A(9.4) A 9.8 A(9.8) Westbound A(9.7) ' Northbound - - - C(24.8) Southbound C(24.0) D 31.6 E(38.7) - EB (Eastbound) and WD (Westbound) lane groups = Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) - NB (Northbound) lane group = Marlene Lane - SB (Southbound) lane group = Eastuly shopping center driveway - Delays are specified in seconds and are shown in parentheses. As shown, there would be no degradation in Level of Service at the signalized intersection of Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road from the No-Build to Build Condition ' with the exception of the overall Level of Service during the Saturday midday peak hour, which is calculated to degrade to Level of Service D. As this degradation would be approximately two (2) ' seconds of delay, the increase in Level of Service would be acceptable. The unsignalized intersection of Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and Marlene Lane/westerly shopping ' center driveway would continue to operate at No-Build Levels of Service during the study peak hours. The easterly shopping center driveway is calculated to continue to operate at No-Build Levels of ' Service with the exception of the southbound approach, which would experience a minor degradation to Level of Service E during the weekday midday and Saturday midday peak hours. Please note, this 95th percentile queue during both peak hours is consistent with the three (3) vehicle ' queue in the No-Build condition. The northbound site driveway approach is calculated to operate at Level of Service C during the weekday midday and Saturday midday peak hours, and Level of ' Service D dumig the weekday evening peak hour. As the Level of Service D translates to a 9511, percentile queue length of approximately one (1) vehicle, the queue can be accommodated at the ' proposed site driveway without impeding on-site circulation. ' The additional site-genetated traffic associated with the proposed Chase Bank is projected to comprise only 2.3% of the total future Build approach volumes at the signalized intersection during ® ATLANTICTRAMC PAGE 14 &DESIGN ENGwiims,.INC 1i the respective study peak hours based on "nevi' traffic. Therefore, the proposed Chase Bank is expected to have minimal resulting traffic impact on the surrounding roadway network and study intersection. 11 'I f 1 i i I I i 'I I I 1j ATLANTIC TRAFFIC PAGE 15 &DESIGNENGmt m,1Nc , i i ~I SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION I , A review has been made of the Site Alignment and Striping Plan (C3.01) for the proposed ' development, prepared by Savik & Murray, LLP, last revised July 1, 2009. In particular, a review has been made focusing on site access, on-site circulation, and parking supply. The following items ' address on-site design characteristics: • The access configuration to the Chase Bank proposes a full-movement driveway along Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) across from the easterly shopping center driveway, foaming a four-legged ' unsignalized intersection. • The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) issued its approval of the ' application and site access plan on August 4, 2008, and based on recent discussions with the NYSDOT Permit Engineer, this approval remains valid to date. ' • A westbound left-turn lane is proposed to accommodate the westbound ingress movement. This roadway capacity improvement would allow for the stacking of approximately four (4) vehicles within an exclusive turn bay so as not to impede through traffic. ' DRIVE-THRU • Drive-dam banks aze typically offered as time saving convenience since bank patrons do not need to park their vehicles and walk into a banking facility. The three (3) proposed drive-thin ' lanes, likewise, will offer to the local customer base the convenience of drive-up banking. • ITE recognizes in Transportation and Land Development that "customers will not use the ' facility if the wait is too long and will exercise the option of using the lobby, making the transaction at another time of the day, or moving their account to a less congested institution." • The Town of Southoid's Zoning Code requires five (5) queuing spaces per drive-thru teller lane, which Chase has provided to comply with this requirement. ATLA,NTICTRAFFIC PAGE 16 ' &DEsicx EmrngamcjNc • Based on drive-thru studies conducted by our office at banks throughout Long Island, the maximum queuing observed during peak hour periods would be expected to be five (5) vehicles ' (total, all lanes). • The proposed drive-thru windows and drive-up Automated Teller Machine will provide a substantial benefit to on-site circulation and also improve customer service, particularly for less ambulatory customers. Drive-thru windows offer expedient and convenient service (particularly during inclement weather) and are especially beneficial for patents with small children and elderly or disabled nnrennc who may Fin.l it easier to remain in th6r . eh'cles u..ng ba: service. PARKING ' • Based on the Town of Southold's Zoning Ordinance, a drive-in bank requires one (1) space per 100 square feet of gross floor area or 42 stalls for a drive-in bank of the subject size. • The Site Alignment and Striping Plan prepared by Savik & Murray, LLP provides 42 on-site parking stalls, including 2 ADA stalls, thus satisfying the Town's parking requirement. ' i L ATLANTICTRAFFIC PAGE 17 &DESIGN ENGWEER.S, INC CONCLUSIONS The analysis has shown that the traffic impact of the proposed Chase Bank with drive-thru ' service on the overall roadway system during the typical peak hours would be minimal. The Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road signalized intersection would continue to operate at the acceptable overall Level of Service D or better during the study peak hours. The "new" trips associated with the Chase Bank with drive-thru service would account for approximately only 2.3% of the future Build total intersection volumes during the critical peak periods. As such, the additional site-generated traffic associated with this Chase Bank with drive-thnx service would ' have minimal traffic impact along the adjacent roadway network. ' The unsignalized intersections with Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) are calculated to operate at acceptable Levels of Service during the weekday midday, weekday evening peak hour, Saturday ' midday peak hours in the Build condition with minor degradations in Level of Service as a result of the change in volume generated by the proposed Hudson City Savings Bank, 7-Eleven, and background growth. As these minor degradations are calculated to operate with future 951" ' percentile queue lengths that will not impede on-site circulation, the results are acceptable by current Traffic Engineering standards. The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) issued its approval of the ' application and site access plan on August 4, 2008, and based on recent discussions with the NYSDOT Permit Engineer, this approval remains valid to date. ' The Site Plan has been designed to provide adequate on-site parking and queuing accommodations based on the Town of Southold's Zoning Ordinance. 1 i ATLANTIC TRAFFIC PAGE 18 ' &DESIGN &\,GwEm, INc. TECHNICAL APPENDIX , ,I Ii A'rt, c TRAFFIC i 41pE GN ENGINEERS, INC. I I 'I I ,i 'I i 1 1 I 1 TECHNICAL APPENDIX 1 1 i 1 i 1 A TL,Arrzc TRAFFIC w. , 8& UFsSIG11T FNGME*S, INC i FIGURES 1 i 1 1 1 1 . 1 i 1 1 ATLANTIC TRAFFIC & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. , SITE LOCATION MAP Figure 1 , Proposed Chase Bank Mattituck, Town of Southold ' Suffolk County, New York p.Wgi ~P~~. ~ i t ` " \ i ~ ~,~MatNWCk i y , James Greek Rgsmnw: mrys.O~N>.cwn i cs>zooswuosms rnrc omv+9~~.urvoeozs rye.. am iz<uan 12142M9 ' ATLANTIC TRAFFIC ' & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. 2009 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES -WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Figure 2 ' Proposed Chase Bank Mattituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York 6361 t F 1 ? 161 Q - MATTITUCK PLAZA O U LL L42 L6 W 57 efi +--.az 39 d i ~--!IN MAIN ROAD 59 1r 1 j- dz (NYS RT 25) J L L 31 f ufi bd 1 t I 806 1 r 650 ' 493 36 55 36 5 .T I ' 53 LU O ~ zQ LU J DO z VACANT SITE CD L4 ( ' 151 6C : ' 1 i6 1 t t_.._.._.._.._.._.._..-I 61 1 LEGEND _ EXISTING ROADWAY - = EXISTING DRIVEWAY WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION i xmm~.,r•aw..w,~,a:r,y„«aam,a. wazo69 r , ATLANTIC TRAFFIC & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. 2009 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES - WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR Figure 3 Proposed Chase Bank Mattituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York ~It , 121 Q EFTUCK PLAZA U I¢ L t 29 g I 75 aT 60 M_ 608 95 a E 626 MAIN ROAD as 51 .J °T (NYS RT 25) .J t 93 84T saa ~U9 na 60 I r 9 f _6d~.. 619 W7 19 02 19 a 1 45 66 LU U-1 LU w VACANT SITE 95 ! 0 1 1 LEGEND ' I = EXISTING ROADWAY EXISTING DRIVEWAY WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES =SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION V[IXYHW?e'6\iriTegpVlryreiNNNR6f~ei6f,~E, 1]/N2009 0~ IN ATLANTIC TRAFFIC & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. i ' 2009 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES - SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Figure 4 Proposed Chase Bank Mattituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York 19t! 1 tYl /i Q ' MATTITUCK PLAZA O U Q U_ 14 I L.- 14 61 39 91 f-491 K 2 j. 475 MAIN ROAD 01 w J 1 j 25 J 1 54 (NYS RT 25) J L. t 9d9 10 1 1 r 22 t r I_.._.._.. m 512 u-? ' - 952 'i M 42 25 2 9 51 >d5 ~5 25 I I o I I Q ZQ i W J : : co w I VACANT SITE CJ J I I I I ' 87 5] 1 1 I l_.._.._..-..-..-..-..J 91 1 59 ' LEGEND ' -EXISTING ROADWAY = EXISTING DRIVEWAY SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES - SIGNAL2ED INTERSECTION z uxvgxAm„e D•o4ynnVH47)%ilrynbi,mA 11Idrz959 I ATLMTic T kmc & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. "NEW' SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Figure 5 Proposed Chase Bank Mattituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York l ]x Q MATTITUCK PLAZA V L ax ax ax ]x t- 2% ox 0% tax MAIN ROAD ax 3% oz • i L ox J 1 ~'x J 1 S sx (NYS RT 25) 1 L! ax ax I t r .ax ax ox t r 16x~~ Ox x 2% Ox Ox 4% /W9-~ 53X JX 44x , ax •--1 I 5]X ~ ~ I I ~ I I z ~ W I I W J z I c~ J CHASE 0 I I ZX 4% r LEGEND =EXISTING ROADWAY = EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY "NEW"PEAK HOUR DISTRIBUTION = SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION 4uowummerc=m..omvlw..www ne.,..sx.w.w ixlanoos 1 i ATLANTIC T kmc ' & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. ' 'PA5SBY' SITE.GENERATED TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Figure 6 Proposed Chase Bank Mattituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York ~ ~1t ax a MATTITUCK PLAZA O ~ t- ox ox p ~sx °x °x ox Lox ox ox ' L ox - MAIN ROAD ox 0% ox j- ox (NYS RT 25) i L j' asx t- °z J % o 0% °x -1 ? I ~x -j i I ? 1 ( O K Q I I W W CHASE U) a I I I I 1 1 i °i t i_.._.._.._.._.._.._..-j ' LEGEND ' EXISTING ROADWAY v EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY -"PASS-BY" PEAK HOUR DISTRIBUTION ' a SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION i 121412M x:VTXWNOA]flT.Mn°YFpe..WIµOAPo/.. A]1R.M 1 AnANTic TRAFHc & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC, "NEW" SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES - WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Figure 7 Proposed Chase Bank MatOtuck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York :ft ~ MATTITUCK PLAZA O U L' : 1_o i Lo ,a A o t- s MAIN ROAD - o , o E 1, r .,J (NYS RT 25) IS- I 9 , 1< I O W uJ J W ED LU W CHASE :F ENTER EXIT 34 It i_.._.._..-..-..-.._.._1 LEGEND = EXISTING ROADWAY = EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY = WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES T.~I =SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION xssm,.rvommrn~ mi.vp~..uxrcax ro... sx Imm 1L4120E9 1 ATLANTIC TRAFFIC & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. "NEW" SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES -WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR Figure 8 ' Proposed Chase Bank Mat6tuck, Town of Southold / Suffolk County, New York Q MATTITUCK PLAZA O LL t, La €La a o , o o ~'+a MAIN ROAD o , o c ~---a (NYS FIT 25) L; X 10 } i_.._.._.. _..I jty a o t l~t~..~ ' aJ t r -i t r IT 1 o -1 I ,T~ i ' I W W CHASE C m J to I ENTER EXIT J2 R i LEGEND EXISTING ROADWAY =EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ,v°aaoe f c~mwaeox~r~,rc o~.ry,...wwcces ry,... sx ~ mr. i, i ATLANTIC TRAFFIC & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. "NEW" SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES - SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Figure g Proposed Chase bank Maltituck, Town of Southold , Suffolk County, New York i t I r > MATTITUCK PLAZA O U t 's L0 Lo o a n o o +s - MAIN ROAD o , o i a y - r ?e' ! l~1~ 2 (NYS RT 25) .J 1 [ 19 22 t r 41 0 0 0 2 21 0 iT • I LU w UI cwASt_ i'r Tn ENTER EXIT ' b JB ! i i I_.._..-..-.. _.._.._..J LEGEND EXISTING ROADWAY =EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES = SIGNALRED INTERSECTION 1 YyynMNW3fllnRe Ali gnytµpp~•YNbu... &11UNS ~l tvnnooa 11 ~ goo AT'LAN'TIC IIYUMC & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. "PASS-BY" SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES -WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Figure 10 Proposed Chase Bank Mattituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York l I I 0 j Q MATTITUCK PLAZA O LL L o i t-o i t 0 0 0 0 0 0- o MAIN ROAD a 0 0 ~---m. r 1 7~ }0 1 3 0 (NYS RT 25) 1 L-. E 10 a ' '1 J o 0 0 0 0 0 ~ a o o a I so a o I i f 0 Z I I LLI DO W I CHASE 4.1 GO O I ENTER EXIT g 3J 2J I I 0 0 ' LEGEND _ _ _ c EXISTING ROADWAY EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY = WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION x:uonv,xmzmnur osxqunv,waawt4..+snmm +va2009 1 ATLANTIC TRAFFIC & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. "PASS•BY" SITE•GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES - WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR Figure 11 Proposed Chase Bank Mat ituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York o ~ ~ MATTITUCK PLAZA U L a o I° MAIN ROAD a a ° ° (NYS RT 25) J 1 qtr a a a ' 10 0 12 a I t3 , O I O LU W J 0 W I CHASE CO i ,n Of ENTER EXIT I 32 13 I i ! i j i i_.._.._.._.._.._.._..-j LEGEND = EXISTING ROADWAY = EXISTING DRIVEWAY =PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES IC a SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION x:ureulosvmrramE °e. w...vxwaxsrw=acme. IV412ON AV ATT,ANTTC TRAMC ' & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. "PASS-BY" SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES - SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Figure 12 ' Proposed Chase Bank Matfituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York IT 0 a MATTITUCK PLAZA U o LL L 0 i t 0 c t o 0 0 ° 0 0 ` 0 MAIN ROAD ° 0 0 Jo I j- ° J j ° (NYS RT 25) J 1 L ° ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 a ° i 0 i I Z I ) LU Do z cf) LU CHASE 40.) co I ENTER -IT A 4 I_..-.. _.._........J l E 1 E LEGEND EXISTING ROADWAY EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES = SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION +vvz 11ATLANTIC TRAFFIC & DESIGN ENGmms, INC. TOTAL SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES - WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Figure 13 Proposed Chase Bank Matlituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York III MATTITUCK PLAZA 0 0 t¢i L-, Lo 's L0 0 0 , -44 ' { 0 0 16 MAIN ROAD o , 0 .,o 1 J l E r (NYS RT 25) 1 1--. 10 Y 'l r r '0~ 1 t r I-.._.._.. -19.1 1 27 1 is -4. 0 0 , 0 T' , ~ i W LU w CHASE CF ENTE0. EXIT rG ST as 1 1 ! T I_..-........ ......-..J LEGEND 11 I =EXISTING ROADWAY EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY 1i = WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES = SIGNALMED INTERSECTION vou.,wwxmmr. w.rw...uwmms ro... s,ms. +vazoas ATT~TIC TItA~'FIC ' &DESIGN ENGmERS, ING TOTAL SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES - WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR Figure 14 ' Proposed Chase Bank Mattitudr, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York 1 I T Gl1l~~j'6cJ > a MATTITUCK PLAZA o U Q u L, t_o it 0 00 4 - 14 0 0 MAIN ROAD - o , o -m (NYS RT 25) J 1 zs 14 14 0 0 1 p I 29 1 Q I ~ I CK I LU g LU W CHASEIr co < I MTER EXIT , < ss x I I LEGEND • EXISTING ROADWAY =EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROP GSED DRIVEWAY t- a WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES =SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION cuwrv.wm3winrtnvmry.nwmczs rYiv.. brJ9m 121413008 ATLANTIC TRAFFIC & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. TOTAL SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES - SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Figure 15 Proposed Chase Bank MaEVtuck, Town of Southold j Suffolk County, New York ~ MATTi7UCK PLAZA 0 u ° 1 19 - MAIN ROAD o 1 o 25 1 x (NYS RT 25 J 1 L. t- ` 1 0 r 0 o x zr 1 25 ~ ° 32 O w ~ I w N CHASE t ENTER EXIT 58 53 1 i 1 r I_.._.._.._.._.._.._..J ~I LEGEN ' • EXISTING ROADWAY = EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES = SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION xcmwuommrmr~owvtr+=.armmera+.. nnm,e. 1x/N2°09 ATLANTIC TRAFFIC ' &DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. 2011 "NO-BUILD" TRAFFIC VOLUMES • WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Figure 16 L Proposed Chase Bank Matfituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York uz w L Ss 7-ELEVEN MATTITUCK PLAZA t r ENTE EX U tK is >6 >t k t L, 67 59 w --sst J6 L 46 a 6w MAIN ROAD - 40 74 J a (NYS RT 25) J L. t- lJs x1~ H 68x t fill -747 0]~ I 1 688-H r ~67 69 39 2 a 1 53 657 655 78 55 Q w m w ( VACANT SITE J 156 67 1 1 t_.._.._.._..-..-.._..-j J6 63 LEGEND EXISTING ROADWAY EXISTING DRIVEWAY : WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION xamurmomm~rtKanvb.+wrvomx rbe 6.n ixemx. 12412009 it ATLAN c TRA,FFIc & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. 2011 "NO-BUILD" TRAFFIC VOLUMES - WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR Figure 17 Proposed Chase Bank Mattituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York 16BI UJ > L°a'•°• AELEVEN T r MATTITUCK PLO AZA 0 ENTER E%R , CJ H6 19 ]1 LL L all L , TO 26 62 611 zs L 36 z C r ]oe MAIN ROAD as sa - ? zS 56 aJ e9 (NYS RT 25) J L Tr eac r 1 OB.. TAB 76 J t r • 713~ 09 26 36 26 1 2 1 66 692 ~e 45 Q I ' of Z j LU g w 122 ; W I VACANT SITE U) f 61 T f t_.._.._.._.._.._.._..J 49 LEGEND = EXISTING ROADWAY =EXISTING DRIVEWAY WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES =SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION K4'm5YH®]61TnIhdYYlp,e.4Npyg ilpwu Rn~ f].tcBya ,nalzofi9 1 b` ATLANTIC tIYtAFFIC 1 & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. 2011 "NO-BUILD" TRAFFIC VOLUMES - SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Figure 18 1 Proposed Chase Bank Mattituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York i J 1 r ~ I t66 ULI 1 < 53 of 7-ELEVEN MATTITUCK PLAZA i 1 O ENTER E%IT C 1 it] 3T 106 108 t ,6 t ,6 64 40 94 sat 6a t 60 a - ssa MAIN ROAD 4' I~ i 't I-~ i see ns ? ~7r fu 80 (NYS RT 25) 1 to V 66 26 + 2 ? 6 J]] I I UU g I I i W IZ I VACANT SITE 1 I I 1 1 t 51 i i_..._.._.._.._.._.._..J 91 60 LEGEND 1 e EXISTING ROADWAY EXISTING DRIVEWAY = SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES =SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION it 1 t~awHWMn.meomlµ.sw,w Asya,n aw~,x+mv. I V V2009 ~I ATLANTIC TV Amc 1 & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. 2011 "BUILD" TRAFFIC VOLUMES - WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Figure 19 Proposed Chase Bank Mattltuck, Town of Southold rj Suffolk County, New York ;411I. 1. +I tI bt / w J/ ~ 'I ',6•,:•• 7-ELEVEN p ~ MATTITUCK PLAZA ~ ENTER EXIT U 141 t9 ]e ]t ~IL¢L } `tib 97 59 K 4565 65 L 40 , 616 MAIN ROAD 40 . tt 74 601 as i soe J 1 ` as (NYS RT 25) .--I 1 L i 35 .762 S 0. v by 40 8 rat 9 2 64 4 6,6 1 27 P m 31 1 w w i UL! C.D CHASE ~ ENTER EXIT 5) 55 159 68 t97 t I_..-.._.._.._.._.._..J LEGEND 'I = EXISTING ROADWAY =EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES = SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION %'.WN%H694)mFnTt W"'FgwuUlwYy6FgmecRM I3+®.W 13I420W N, c TRAFFTc & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. 1 2011 'BUILD" TRAFFIC VOLUMES - WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR Figure 20 Proposed Chase Bank Mattituck, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York 1651 . 113 ' W > t-"••-- 7-ELEVEN n r MATTITUICK PLAZA O ENTFJi EXIT 15117 1s Lai 9 : Lg5 ,e zfi w ~666.36 t x z i 724 MAIN ROAD - 35 1 53. ~--,a J 1 J s 56 J 1 t- (NYS RT 25) J 1 L 6 1 6N fiss-~ N 33 31 46 I 39 i O I i ! Q ~ ¢ ! ! W J W W CHASE ! of I £N ER Exrt SC Sd I I 103 6I1 r ,6 ? 60 Imo..-..-..~.. ..-..-..J ' LEGEND EXISTING ROADWAY ' a EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED DRNEWAY t-= WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES =SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION I %1,b1NM W]TI..Ih CWVqunNN~}6 .i A.H U1NA 121V29 I w AT .NTic Tkkmc r & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. 2011 'BUILD' TRAFFIC VOLUMES - SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Figure 21 Proposed Chase Bank Mattituck, Town of Southold , Suffolk County, New York 200 } his r W Y "t• 7-ELEVEN O I MATTITUCK PLAZA ENTER E%rt U 115 27 196 106 15 86 90 98 558 38 ` 198 1 77 I 3 L 50 6 i 572 MAIN ROAD 43 I1 6I9 579 ! 24 e °ds j i 62?I (NYS RT 25) ~-+S 35 zsz 11 1 r r• °y I r •f~ to 879~-~ 70- n 46 zs 2 5 55 63 29 Z 785 I 27 1 25 22 1 I Q I 6 Q LLI I J DwD w i CHASE Cp ENTER EXIT I 'I 58 55 94 ? 1 88 98 62 I _ _ . . I LEGEND =EXISTING ROADWAY = EXISTING DRIVEWAY 1 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY = SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES =SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION XwF.ONM9minllcpYnRyu..NN UM.q+.. x..lixa9.m ' 1Z4R009 TECHNICAL APPENDIX ATLANnC TRAFFIC &D~STGN ENGINEERS, TNC LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS , While traffic volumes provide a measure of activity on the area roadway system, it is also important to evaluate how well that system can accommodate those volumes i.e., a comparison of peak traffic volumes with available roadway capacity. By definition, capacity represents the maximum number of vehicles which can be accommodated given the constraints of roadway geometry, environment, traffic characteristics, and controls. Intersections are usually the critical point in any road network since it is at such points that conflicts exist between through, crossing, and turning traffic and where rn fin, is m t Ml 1y to Orrtlr. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS I ~ An unsignalized (i.e., '-YIELD" or "STOP" sign controlled) driveway or side street along a through route is seldom critical from an overall capacity standpoint, however, it may be of great significance to the capacity of the minor cross-route, and it may influence the quality of traffic flow on both. In analyzing unsignalized intersections, it is assumed that both the through movements and , right trim movements on the major street approaches are unimpeded and have the right-of-way over the minor street approaches and left turns from the major street. All other turning movements in the intersection cross, merge with, or are otherwise impeded by the major street movements. The concept in determining traffic delays at an unsignahzed intersection is to process these impeded movements in a sequential manner. For each impeded movement, all conflicting flows are summed, and an initial critical `gap' in traffic is determined with a "follow-up" gap determined for subsequent vehicles waiting in a queue. Based upon the number of available gaps in the passing traffic stream, [he potential capacity of that movement can be calculated. However, since operation at capacity is usually unsatisfactory to most drivers, a descriptive mechanism (Level of Service) has been developed which describes traffic operations as a function of average total delay. Unsignalized Levels of Service range from `A' (delays less than 10 seconds) to T' (delays greater than 50 seconds). Table I summarizes the relationship between capacity and Level of Service for unsignahzed intersections as defined by the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual 2000. j 'I 1 I ' LEVEL OF SERVICE AND EXPECTED DELAY FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY (SEC.NFH.) A <10 B >10and<15 ' C >15and<25 D > 25 and < 35 H > 35 and < 50 F > 50 Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual HCM2000.2000, by the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. i II SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS At signalized intersections, numerous other factors regulate the various approach capacities, including width of approach, number of lanes, signal "green tune", turning percentages, truck volumes, etc. As with unsignaaed intersections, operation at capacity is far from satisfactory since substantial delays or reduced operating speeds are likely. Therefore, a similar description mechanism has been developed (also called Level of Service) which indicates, on the basis of average delay per vehicle, the relative smoothness of intersection operation on a scale of `A' (indicating average delays of 10 seconds or less) to T' (indicating average delays greater than 60 seconds). The various levels of signalized intersections are summarized in Table 11. Again, the acceptable limit of delay for most motorists is Level of Service `E'. Delays cannot be related to overall roadway capacity in a simple one-to-one fashion. It is possible to have delays in the Level of Service `F' range, without exceeding the physical roadway capacity. Such delays can exist if one or more of the following conditions exist: ? long signal cycle lengths (the time of complete a full sequence of signal phases); ? the particular traffic movement experiences a long red tithe; or, ? a progressive movement for a particular lane group is poor. ~I i i 1 1 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ' LEVEL OF DESCRIPTION AVERAGE SERVICE TOTAL DELAY A Progression is very favorable; many vehicles do not stop at ail; <i0 short cycle length contributes to low delay values. B Generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle >10 and <20 length; more vehicles stop than with Level of Service A, causing 1 higher levels of delay. C Fair progression and/or longer cycle length; the number of >20 and <35 1 vehicles stopping is significant at this level, though many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. D Longer delays may, result from unfavorable progression, long > 35 and < 55 cycle length, or high volume/capacity ratios; many vehicles stop and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines; individual cycle failures are noticeable 1 E These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, > 55 and < 80 long cycle length, and high volume/capacity ratios; individual 1 cycle failures are frequent. F Considered unacceptable to most drivers; often occurs with > 80 over-saturation (ie. arrival flow rates exceed capacity), high volume/capacity ratios, and many individual cycle failures. Capacity is not necessarily exceeded under this Level of Service. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, HCM2000. 2000, published by the 1 Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 1 1 1 1 i l TECHNICAL APPENDIX 1 Ili 11'! A TLANTIC TMFFIC , & DESIGN EiGINEERS, INC. I HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS l Main Road & Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Place i 11 1 1'' ' Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 ' HCS+ DETAILED REPORT iAnalerall't'Ottnal/brrtt.~t,`:•`-i`~~~*~.., 43~ fir xp«~~~u3,s' s Analyst 8MZ I[ Intersection Main Rd & Factory/Sigshee Agency or Co. ATDE Area Type AI/ otherareas Date Performed 8/2512009 Jurisdiction Town ofSouffrold Time Period Weekday Midday Analysis Year Existing Project ID AN09026 EB ~WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT ' Number of Lanes. Ni 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR- Volume, V (vph) 54 493 53 41 472 42 36 55 38 88 57 93 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 15 4 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.85 0.85 0,85 Pretimed (Pj or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A ' Start-up Lost Time, It 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ' Unit Extension, UE 3.0 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 11000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' Pod i Bike I RTOR Volumes 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 O 17 Lane Width 12.0 11.5 -12.0 - 12.0 10.0 9.0 10.5 11.0 Parking t Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, W ' - Buses Stopping, Nis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 32 3.2 3.2 - 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Penn 03 04 SB Only NB Onty 07 OB Timing G= 15.0 G= 35.0 G= G= G= 25.0 G= 10.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 1050 ' a EB. _ WB NB SB LT TH DT IT TH PT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 65 653 45 562 49 117 104 156 Lane Group Capacity,c 293 931 226 598 160 154 404 396 vic Ratio, X 0.22 0.70 0.20 0.94 0.31 0.76 0.26 0.39 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.52 0.52 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.10 0.24 0.24 Uniform Delay, d1 17.7 18.8 25.0 34.0 44.3 46.3 32.5 33.6 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 9.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.27 0.11 0.45 0.11 0.31 0.11 0.11 ' Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 2.4 a4 23.0 1.1 19.6 0.3 0.8 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18,0 21.2 25.4 57.0 45.4 65.9 32.8 343 Lane Group LOS B C C E D E C C Approach Delay 20,9 54,7 59.8 33.7 Approach LOS C D E C Intersection Delay 38.2 X~ = 0.62 Intersection LOS D CogYd9ht®2005Vr rSk.fPbrlda, All Rights Reserved HCS+w vw.lon5.21 Generated: 12142009 5:54 PM ' file://C:\Documents and Settings%zimolkaTocal Settings\Temp\s2k2405.tmp 12/4/2009 Detailed Report Page I of 1 , N HCS+- DETAILED REPORT 'Ge1)eia)lnfoX~riafiS" "~*v? - r~~F,;?`ri ~~I ~sku e,F;r Sifet n nnn`e'Uoa`~"~v^ r'~~g, ~xw+4 ids e v'r -.s aaeeaa.'~„r Analyst amz Intersection Main Rd & Factory/S/gsbee Agency or Co. ATDE Area Type All other areas Date Performed 121412009 Jurisdiction Town of Southold Time Period Weekday Midday Analysis Year No-Build Project ID AN09026 y s Tu e a d,Tlmin lft aY . x ~i aS w v1 r . }j s5 a! €o_ , EI3 WB NB SB r63 TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 ' Lane Group TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 555 55 44 541 44 38 59 39 91 59 97 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 4 0 5 5 0 0 0 1 2 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.85 0.85 0.85 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li - 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 3.0 Flltering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 j Ped / Bike / R70R Volumes 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 to 17 Lane Width 12.0 111.6- 1 12.0 12.0 10.0 9.0 10.5 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 Timing G= 15.0 G= 35.0 G= G= G= 25.0 G= 10.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y=. Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 025 Cycle Length, C = 105.0 14 EB. WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 76 730 48 640 52 125 107 f63 Lane Group Capacity,c 293 932 173 599 160 154 404 396 v/c Ratio, X 0.26 0.78 0.28 1.07 0.32 0.81 0.26 0.41 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.52 0.52 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.10 0.24 0.24 , Uniform Delay, d1 19.0 20.2 25.7 35.0 44.3 46.6 32.5 33.8 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.33 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.35 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 4.4 0.9 56.4 1.2 27.0 0.4 0.7 , Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 19.5 24.6 26.6 91.4 45.5 73.6 32.9 34.5 Lane Group LOS B C C F D E C C Approach Delay 24.1 86.9 65.3 33.8 Approach LOS C F E C Intersection Delay 51.5 X~ = 0.68 Intersection LOS 0 Copyright 02005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCSt*u Versbn 5.21 GawoI.& 12/42W9 257 PM i fileWCADocuments and Settings\bzimolkaTocal Settings\Temp\s2k1F1A.tMp 12/4/2009 ' Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 ' HCS+ DETAILED REPORT - Analyst BMZ *Intersection Main Rd & Factory/Sigsbee ' Agency or Co. ATDE Area Type All other areas Date Performed 121412009 Jurisdiction Town of Southold Time Period Weekday Midday Analysis Year Build Project ID AND9026 ale ~e•srld4'~11`rf ES WB NB SB' LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT ' Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 63 570 55 45 555 44 38 59 40 92 59 97 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 15 4 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.83 0.83 _^.83 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.73 0.73 O .M 0.85 0.85 0.85 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A. A Start-up Lost Time, it - 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 - 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ' Unit Extension, LIE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 q12.0 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped I Bike I RTOR Volumes 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 17 Lane Width - 12.0 11.5 12.0 10.0 9.0 10.5 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB OnW0.25- 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 Timing G= 15.0 _ G= G= 25.0 G= 10.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = Cycle Length, C = 105.0 a.. - EB VVB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 76 748 49 655 52 126 108 163 Lane Group Capacity, c 293 932 161 599 160 154 404 396 vic Ratio, X 0.26 780 0.30 1.09 0.32 0.82 0.27 0.41 Total Green Ratio, glC 0.52 0.52 a33 0.33 0.10 0.10 0.24 0.24 Uniform Delay, dd 19.0 20.5 26.0 35.0 44.3 46.6 32.5 33.6 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 7000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k all 0.35 0.11 750 all 0.36 0.11 0.11 ~ Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 5.1 1.1 64.9 1.2 28.1 E0.4 0.7 Initial Queue Delay, ds 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 19.5 25.7 27.0 99.9 45.5 74,7 32.9 34.5 Lane Group LOS B C C F D E C C Approach Delay 25.1 94.8 66.2 33.9 Approach LOS C F E C Intersection Delay 54.8 X, = 0.70 Intersection LOS D Copyright 02005 UrtV miry of Riorida, Al Rights Reserved HCS-- Version 5,21 Generated: 12MM09 258 PM ' fileWCADocuments and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\s2k1F64.tmp 12/4/2009 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+ DETAILED REPORT , ~+`e1 sis('rr1 nriii P G s`l gg f* ass b } r.~_, ~~o"r All BMZ Intersection Main Rd 8 Factory/Sigsbee Agency or Co. ATDE Area Type Alf other areas t Date Performed 812512009 Jurisdiction Town of Southold Time Period Weekday Evening Analysis Year Existing Project ID AN09026 EB WB NB Ss I RT j LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT WA Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 -7 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vPh) 60 577 46 22 606 29 19 32 19 75 %Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (Aj A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pad / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 16 t Lane Width 12.0 11.5 12.0 12.0 10.b 9.0 10.5 11.0 Parking /Grade /Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 - 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 I Timing G= 17.0 G= 50.0 G= G= G= 10.0 G= 8.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Duration of AnaI - yss,T-0.25 Cycle Length, C= 105.0 i a,._ eta. •ira'ri"c4n`,~??~I EB .WB NS SB, LT TH RT LT TH R7 LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 66 676 26 747 21 48 74 106 Lana Group Capacity, c 403 1234 369 871 128 125 163 157 v!c Ratio, X 0.16 0.55 0.07 0.86 0.16 0.38 0.45 0.68 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.69 0.69 0.48 0.48 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.10 Uniform Delay, d1 13.4 8.3 14.9 24.3 45.4 46.2 44.9 45.9 Progression Factor, PF 1000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.15 0.11 0,39 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.25 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.5 0.1 8.5 0.6 2.0 2.0 10.9 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.5 15.0 32.9 46.0 48.1 46.9 56.9 Lane GrcuP LOS 8 A B C D D D E Approach Delay 9.2 32.3 47.5 52.8 Approach LOS A C D D Intersection Delay 25.3 X~ = 0.67 Intersection LOS C , Copyright ®2005 Universty, or Ftorka, All Rights Reserved "CS- Version 5,21 Generated: 17/412009 5:54 PM file://C:\DOCmnents and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\s2k24D2.tmp 12/4/2009 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+^DETAILED REPORT 2'~jai;(Y7 Tn'fv}niia>$ri~~ ~+~ri!aX~l,r"~~,.,,~?sk1~<. . ~ , , ,nwe~,~.q.. G'~>~u_ 1•~k~'.~ . t w~ i; ~w Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & Faclory7Sigsbee Agency or Co. ATDE Area Type AI/otherareas ' Date Performed - 121412009 Jurisdiction Town of Southold Time Period Weekday Evening Analysis Year No-Build Project ID AN09026 G-ollrme.a'htilG7mM Sri u~~._.r ~'f .~,.1 S.~ EB wS NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT ' Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 d25 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR 7R L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 70 639 48 671 30 20 35 20 62 28 78 % Heavy Vehicles,%HV 0 3 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 a81 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A e Start-up Lost Time, It 2A 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 - Extension of Effective Green, a 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3- 3 3 3 3 3 3 ' Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Fiftering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qn 0.0 0.0 0,0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pad l Bike I RTOR Volumes 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 16 Lane Width - 12.0 11.5 12.0 12.0 10.0 9.0 10.5 11.0 Parking / Grade I Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GO 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 ==O, erm 03 04 SB Only NB Only _ 07 OB 0 G= G= G=10.0 G= 8.0 G= G I Y= Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Cycle Length, C = 105.0 se~ EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 77 7q6 29 824 -22 52 77 112 Lane Group Capacity, c 364 1235 346 671 128 E 163 157 v/c Ratio, x 0.21 0.60 0.08 0.95 0.17 0.47 0.71 ' Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.69 0.69 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.10 0.10 Uniform Delay, d1 16.7 8.9 15.0 26.2 45.4 45.0 46.1 Progression Factor, PF 1ELL, .000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.19 0.11 0.46 0.11 0.11 0.28 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.8 0.1 18.7 0.6 2.2 14.2 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 17.0 9.7 15.1 44.9 46.0 47.2 60.3 Lane Group LOS A B D D D E Approach Delay 10.4 43.9 47.6 55.0 Approach LOS B D D D ' Intersection Delay 30.9 X~ = 0.73 Intersection LOS C copyright ®2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS-- Version 5.21 Generated: 121412009 2'57PM ' fileWC:\Documents and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\s2k1F2C.tmp 12/4!2009 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 ,l ~I HCS+ DETAILED REPORT Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & Factory/Sigsbee Agency or Co. ATDE Area Type All other areas' Date Performed 121412009 Jurisdiction Town of Southold Time Period Weekday Evening Analysis Year Build Project ID AN09026 iolLinagndfffri nbt,kg saPF~kR3~'-0.zR& F;en.zFh~ a4k'a"TL,sea f, s; EB WB NS SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 d63 1 0 Lane Group L TR LTR L TR TR Volume, V(vph) 70 653 48 26 885 31 20 35 21 28 78 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1 091 085 0.85 0.85 092 092 0.92 0.81 0.81 I Pretl ; { ad (Pj or Actuated (A) A j A A A A A A A A NO2 Start-up Lost Time, h 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ArrivalType, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 FiReringlMetering, I 1.000 1000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Ob 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped i Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 16 Lane Width 12.0 11.5 12.0 120 10.0 9.0 - 10.5 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 Parking Maneuvers, N. Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 i Timing G= 17.0 G= 50.0 G= G= G= 10.0 G= 8.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 105.0. EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT- LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 77 762 31 842 22 53 - 78 112 Lane Group Capacity, c 364 1235 340 871 128 125 163 157 v/c Ralio. X 0.21 0.62 709 0.97 0.17 0.42 0.48 0.71 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.69 0.69 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.10 Uniform Delay, d1 174 9.0 15.1 26.7 45.4 46.3 45.0 46.1 Progression Factor, PF 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0111 0.20 0.11 0.47 0.11 0.11 0.1 1 0.28 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.9 0.1 22.8 0.6 2.3 2.2 14.2 ,iInitial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 17.6 9.9 15.2 49.3 46.0 48.6 47.2 60.3 Lane Group LOS B A B D D O D E Approach Delay 10.6 48.1 47.9 54.9 11 Approach LOS B D D PC Intersection Delay 32.9 X = 0.75 Intersection LOS C ' copyright 02005 University of Fbfida, Ali Rights Reserved HCS+1- Version 5.21 Generated: 12141r2009 2:59 PM ,i fileWCADocuments and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\s2k1F7A.tmp 12/4/2009 11 ' Detailed Report Page 1 of I ' HCS+ DETAILED REPORT t1.ellr6iIf1w r'~J al? 'Y r .A. 4lteWiYtrr~ia7f3~r"rr,:i rri a r,,, r ~u z Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & Factory/Stgsbee Agency or Co. AIDE Area Type All other areas ' Date Performed 812512009 Jurisdiction Town of Southold Time Period Saturday Midday Analysis Year Existing ' Project ID AN09026 EB 1Ar8 NB SB LT TH FIT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 1 1 0 d26 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 65 682 28 20 491 14 42 23 91 39 61 % Heavy Vehicles, °Y.HV 0 3 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 096 096 0.96 093 093 093 0.71 0.71 0.87 0.87 0.87 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A ' Start-up Lost Time, h 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ' Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3. .0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 3 Lane Width 12.0 11.5 12.0 12.0 10.0 9.0 10.5 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 32 3 2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 Timing G= 13.0 G= 38.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= 14.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 025 Cycle Length, C = 105.0 fflyliqlas;i w r ES WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 68 733 22 540 37 89 105 112 Lane Group Capacity, c 343 964 i91 665 225 217 327 318 vic Ratio, X 0.20 0.76 0.12 0.81 0.16 0.41 0.32 0.35 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.53 0.53 0.36 0.36 0.13 0.13 0.19 0.19 ' Uniform Delay, d1 16.1 19.2 22.3 3D.3 40.3 41.7 36.6 36.9 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 ' Incremental Delay, d2 - 0.3 36 0.3 76 0.3 1.3 _ 0.6 0.7 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 16.4 22.8 22.6 37.9 40.7 43.0 37.2 37.6 Lane Group LOS B C C D D D D D Approach Delay 22.3 37.3 42.3 37.4 Approach LOS C O D D ' Intersection Delay 306 X, = 0.62 Intersection LOS C \ Capydghl 02006 UMVerslly W Florida, AP Rights Reserved HGS1- Versam 5.21 Generaled: 11/0/2009 5:64 PM I file://CADOCUments and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\s2k24E4.tmp 12/4/2009 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 ' HCS+- DETAILED REPORT , a t a- 2 ;GetT'et'Sllq 1118fI 1nfo~lifaY101t'2'~,;.~~ Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & Factory/Sigsbee Agency or Co. ATDE Area Type All other areas Date Performed 12/4/2009 Jurisdiction Town of Southold Time Period Saturday Midday Analysis Year No-Build Project to AN09026 lyoluuSg iridhTlfi7fi"'.Tn ut rs ' 3 'r 4kr ¢i5a i a s4 tro rrstr , ph,i~Y,a sz,` . EB WS NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 1 Number of Lanes, Ni 1787727 0 1 1 0 i 1 0 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 29 23 541 15 27 46 24 94 40 64 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.87 0.87 0.87 ?retuned (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A - A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, LIE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Ob 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pad I Bike I RTOR Volumes 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 3 Lane Width 12.0 11.5 12:0 12.0 10.0 9.0 10.5 11.0 Parking I Grade I Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, N. Buses Stopping, Ne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 - 08 Timing G= 13.0 G= 38.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= 14.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 105.0 EB WB NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 81 781 25 595 38 96 108 116 Lane Group Capacity, c 302 964 157 665 225 217 327 318 vfc Ratio, X 0.27 0.81 0.16 0.89 0.17 0.44 0.33 0.36 Total Glen Ratio, gIC 0.53 0.53 0.36 0.36 0.13 0.13 0.19 0.19 Uniform Delay, df 17.7 20.1 22.7 31.6 40.3 41.9 367 37.0 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.35 0.11 0,42 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 5.3 0.5 14.7 0.4 1.4 0.6 0.7 Initial Queue Delay, ids 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.2 25.4 23.2 46.3 40.7 43.3 37.3 37.7 Lane Group LOS 8 C C D D D D D Approach Delay 24.7 45.4 42.6 37.5 Approach LOS C D D D Intersection Delay 34.5 X = 0.65 Intersection LOS C Copynghl®2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCSI+ Vereioo5.21 Generated: 12/42009 M8 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\bzimolka\LOCal Settings\Temp\s2k1F3F.tmp 12/4/2009 Detailed Report Page 1 of I ' HCS+ DETAILED REPORT .,,u..... Ns w.f% ~`E' v r 1 ' f s r. n` `V~ 3 E§"'.. MOW r:GBrfara. ot'itiari~tsn, ~;r±~~,". Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & Factory/Sigsbee Agency or Co. ATDE Area Type Allotherareas ' Date Performed IV412009 Jurisdiction Town of Southold Time Period Saturday Midday Analysis Year Build Project ID AN09026 ' ,VQIOfe ahtl°T1mltt 1Jr 11Y:mkv'+'Q1'T.'."iE~restA°ur'?2. ?i~fz-' frk^' > n +y,. =3 2'V:.' rL~ +tss", EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT ' Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 78 747 29 - 24 559 15 27 46 25 96 40 64 °A Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.87 0.87 0.87 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A ' Start-up Lost Time, h r2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 3 ' Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 FikeringtMetering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' Ped / Bike I RTOR Volumes 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 3 Lane Width ' 12.0 11.5 12.0 12.0 10.0 9.0 10.5 -11.0 Parking / Grade I Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, N. Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 G= 13.0 G= 38.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= 14.0 G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 105.0 EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 81 802 26 614 38 97 110 116 Lane Group Capacity, c 295 964 142 665 225 217 327 318 vic Ratio, X 0.27 0.83 0.18 0.92 0.17 0.45 0.34 0.36 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.53 0.53 0.36 0.36 0.13 0.13 0.19 0.19 ' Uniform Delay, d1 18.3 20,6 2Z.9 321 40.3 41.9 36.8 37.0 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.37 0.11 0.44 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 6.3 0.6 1tL 0.4 i.5 0.6 0.7 Initial Queue Delay, da 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.8 26.8 23.5 540.7 43.4 37.4 37.7 Lane Group LOS B C- C D D D D Approach Delay 26.1 49.6 42.6 37.5 Approach LOS C D D D Intersection Delay 36.7 X° = 0.67 Intersection LOS D Copyright®2005 Urdesily or Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS- Versim5.21 Generated: 12142006 2:59 PM 1 fileWCADocuments and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\s2k1F90.tmp 12/4/2009 TECHNICAL APPENDIX ,I i 1 1 ATLA'Nuc TRAffic , & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS I' Main Road and Marlene/Shopping Center Driveway I' ,I i Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 4't{ d 4Y - r _r . - - to 5.- IY F,' 4y , 'e§ u°`„+ts'~~ yr f~e~b. r~tlFfSF..fi~iO~tlSrou : ~t,.~`Rr~ VAIM",-„'u'- ' Analyst SMz Intersection Main Rd 8 Marlene Ln/Driveway Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 8262009 Analysis Year Existing Analysis Time Period Weekday Midday Project Description AIV09026 EastMest Street: Main Road NYS Rt 25 North/South Street: Marlene LaneAlVest Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stu Period hrs : 0.25 gi N Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement - 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 601 18 42 508 6 ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.93 0.83 0.91 0.91 0.91 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR f 724 21 46 1 558 6 ~ rehAs ' Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0- Configuration TR L TR Upstream SI nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Soulhbound ' Movement 7 8 - 9 -10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 8 2 51 4 39 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.83 0.83 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 2 72 0 4 46 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 2 0 2 2 ' Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Store 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 ' Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR rtv ' Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 it 12 Lane Configuration L LTR TR v (veh/h) 46 85 50 C (m) (veh/h) 872 287 427 Vic 0.05 0.30 0.12 95% queue length 0.17 1.20 0.39 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 22.7 14.5 ' LOS A C B Approach Delay (s/veh) 22.7 14.5 Approach LOS - C S C0pydght®2005 Urtiversily of Ronda, At Rights Reserved HCS.TM Varstan 5.21 Generated: 1292009 5:54 PM 1 file://C:\Documents and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Tcmp\u2k24E8.tmp 12/4/2004 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Gk ~ I.I[if~i rxr(.---h ~r #S us°t*>'? vT1 bS~ t -~ry t s ti-y.S Ea s T't 1 ~3,~ ' Vtflldtl0rll 11i ,'}v,k.ri 4rMYi."le ~.sh~-.1 .r,'F'a,_~. 's"'iY`all!&13A~rlnx+~l~1r{~ "'~3j1.:!&r.~-",-~..`~"4'~5, ~ti~~ia;.M1+. 'd-s'.i'af:[•~5~. Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & Marlene Ln/Drfveway'. Agency/Co. AIDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 121412009 Analysis Year No-Build Analysis Time Period Weekday Midday Pro'ect Description AN09026 East/West Streot: Main Road NYS Rt 25 North/South Street: Marlene LaneAMest Drivewa ! Intersection Orientation: -East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 NO MAN ~_N§ Major street Eastbound Westboun d Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 666 19 44 601 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF - 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 i 802 1 22 48 660 6 ! Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - _ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channel'rced 0 0 Lanes - 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 8 2 53 4 40 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.83 0.83 0.83 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 vehih 2 75 0 _ 4 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 2 0 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 , RTChannelized 0 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 11 Configuration LTR TR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound I Movement 1 4 7 8 9. 10 11 12 ' Lane Configuration L LTR TR v (veh/h) 48 68 52 C (m) (veh/h) 815 238 364 ,I Vic 0.06 0.37 0.14 95% queue length 0.19 1.62 0.49 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 28.7 - 16.5 ,I LOS A p C Approach Delay (sNeh) - 28.7 16.5 Approach LOS - D C Copyrt^02005 dnivarsilyef Floritla. AH Rights Reservetl HCS- Verslon5.21 Genernled: 12/4/2009 3:00PIA ~I file://C:\Documents and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1F95.tmp 12/4/2009 ' Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of I ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY S~ ~ nfa&a:: ~OR OMMM ' Analyst BMz Intersection Main Rd 8 Marten Ln7Ddveway Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 12142009 Analysis Year Build Analysis Time Period Weekday Midday ' Project Description AN09026 EastfWast Street: Main Road NYS Rt 25 North/South Street: Madene LaneM/est Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 e ' Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 683 19 45 816 8 ' Peak-Hour Factor PHF 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 r 822. 22 49 676 , 6 (veh/h 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 - - Median Type Unded RT Channeltzed 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L TR Upstream Signal 6 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound ' Movement 7 a 9 10 1i 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 8 2 54 4 40 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.83 0.83 0.83 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 2 77 0 4 48 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0- 2 0 0 0 ' Percent Grade (-A) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 ' Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR TR ' v (veh/h) 49 90 52 C (m) (veh/h) 801 230 355 v/c 0.06 0.39 0.15 III ' 96% queue length 0.20 - 1.75 0.51 Control Delay (siveh) 9.8 30.4 16.9 LOS A D C Approach Delay (sfveh) - 30.4 16.9 Approach LOS - - D C Copyright 02M5 University of Florida, M Rights Reserved HCS+*a Version5.21 Generated: 12142009 3:01PM ' file://C:\Documents and Settings%zimolka\Local Settings\Terap\u2klFA2.tmp 12/4/2009 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Sur "~tt0Mfl~{=Mmi't'syr~`~'Ss''~ T rT~l}-nW.;dA i M ('Ny fi l~. Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & Marlene Ln7Dnveway Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 8262009 Analysis Year Existing , Analysis Time Period Weekday Evening Project Descri lion AN09026 East'West Street: Main Road NYS Rt 25 North/South Street: Marlene Lane/West Drivewa ' Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Mo or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 2 3 4 5 6 ,I L T Volume veh/h 647 9 47 620 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR p 710 9 /vehlh) ~-1 1 55 1 729 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 _ 0 Median Type ! Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1-- 0 Configuration TR L TR Upstream Signal - 0 0 , Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 - 8 g 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 2 1 45 2 35 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0182 0.79 0.77 0.77 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 2 1 54 0 2 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 2 2 Percent Grade p 0 - Flared Approach N N ~I Storage 0 0 RT Channelized - 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound e Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR TR v (veh/h) - 55 57 47 C (m) (veh/h) 892 356 372 Vic 0.06 0.16 0.13 95%queue length 0.20 0.56 0.43 Control Delay (stveh) 9.3 17.0 16.1 LOS A C C Approach Delay (s/veh) 17,0 16.1 Approach LOS C C Copyryht02005 UrMrsily or Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS-* Veislon 5.21 Gane2ted: 12142M 555 PM file://C:\DOCuments and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2k24EB.tmp 12/4/2009 Two-Way Stop Control Page I of I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY pt~i;ii±f ter Ott 0: ' Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & Marlene Ln/Drlveway AgencylCo. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 121412009 Analysis Year No-Build Analysis Time Period Weekday Evening ' Project Description AN09026 East/ West Street: Main Road NYS Rt 25 North/South Street: Marlene Larsw Wast Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs: 0.25 Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh81) 712 9 49 708 9 ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate; HFR t(veh/h) 0 7a"2 l 9 37 I 832 l t0 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 ' Lanes - 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound ' Movement 7 8 9 10 - it 12 L T R L T R Volume veh1h 2 1 46 1 J_ 2 36 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.79 0.77 0.77 ' - Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 1 56 0 2 46 ehm Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 2 2 ' Percent Grade 0 - 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 WT Channelized 0 0 ' Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR TR ' v(veh/h) 57 - 59 48 C (m) (vetdh) - 838 310 320 VIC 0.07 0.19 0.15 95% queue length 0.22 0.69 0.52 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.6 19.3 18.2 LOS - A C C Approach Delay (slveh) 19.3 18.2 Approach LOS - C C ' Copyright 02005 Unlversfty of FloriDa, All Rights Reserved HCS. Version 5.21 Gansraled; 121412009 J:of PM ' file://C:\Documents and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2klF9A.tmp 12/4/2009 I Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 'I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Deli' plitforrilafinn;s ?:1 ..Site fo'ri1a'" `,..°:"s Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & Marlene Ln/Dfiveway Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 12/4/1009 Analysis Year Build Analysis Time Period Weekday Evening Project Description AN09026 EastNVest Street: Main Road NYS Rt 25 North/South Street: Marlene LaneANest Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume vehlh) 728 9 50 724 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR I 0 I 799 I - I 58 I 851, 10 (veh/h` Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channellzed 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 , Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 . 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 2 1 47 2 36 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.79 0.77 0.77 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 1 57 0 2 46 veh/h ' Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 2 2 I Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 , Configuration LTR TR ' Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR Tf2 v (veh/h) 58 60 48 C (m) (vehlh) 826 300 309 Vic 0.07 0.20 0.16 , 95% queue length 0.23 0.73 0.54 Control Delay (slveh) 9.7 20.0 18.8 , i LOS A C C Approach Delay (sNeh) 20.0 18.8 Approach LAS C C ' I Copyright 02005 University or Flotldk All Rights Reserved HCS-1- Version 5.21 Generated: Iv4now 3:02PM I file://C:\Documents and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1FA7.tlnp 12/4/2009 ' ' Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & Marlene LMDriveway , Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Perrormed 8!26/2009 Analysis Year Existing ' Analysis Time Period Saturday Midday Pro'ect Descri tion AN09026 East/West Street: Main Road NYS Rt 25 NoAhlSouth Street: Marten Lane/Wssf Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume vehih 774 22 58 475 14 ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 806 22 62 510 15 fvehlhl Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - - ' Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 i 1 0 Configuration TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume vehih 2 5 51 3 48 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 5 60 0 3 54 vehb Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 ' Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 ' Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR Approach Eastbound Westhound Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR TR ' v (vehih) 62 67 57 C (m) (vehih) 812 301 466 Vic 0.08 0.22 0.12 ' 95% queue length 0.25 0.84 0.41 Control Delay (sfveh) 9.8 20.4 13.8 LOS A C B ' Approach Delay (sfveh) - - 20.4 13.8 Approach LOS C B copyright a mas University of nO a, All Rlghls Reserved HCSI- Vers n5.21 Genemted 12/412009 5:55PM file://C:1Documents and Settings\bzimolkaTocal Settings\Tern&21:24EE.tmp 12/4/2009 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 1! TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Ci@! 1,11lrlfbry}'fa~iOri,_..w 372 :°rs n.;' ilJ1 Yk' 21a0'Yr3„ 1 k:w h ..t+. a a` .`a t esa,t- r:"; , Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & Marlene Ln/Driveway Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 121412009 Analysis Year No-Build , Analysis Time Period Saturday Midday Project Description AN09026 ' EastNVesl Street: Main Road NYS Rt 25 Norlh/South Street: Marlene Lane/West Drivewa Intersection Orientation: East-West - Stud Period hrs : 0.25 I' n,nNmy 'urYtasnil A~' .Kn e uE §ppof Major Street - Eastbound Westbound ' Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R j Volume (veh/h 822 -23 60 554 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly h Flow Rate, HFR v I 0 t 85`6 23 64 I 5.05 I 16 „o ) ' Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channeltzed - 0 0 Lanes 0 1- 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L TR U stream Signal 0 - 0 _ Minor Street Northbound Southbound i Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 2 5 53 3 50 ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.88 0.88 0.88 vein Flow Rate, HFR 2 5 63 0 3 56 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 2 2 ' Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N - ' Storage' 0 0 RT Channelized - 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Configuration LTR TR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR TR v(vehyh) 64 70 59 ' C (m) (veh/h) 777 270 411 Vic 0.08 0.26 0.14 95% queue length 0.27 1.01 0.50 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.0 22.9 15.2 t LOS 8 C C Approach Delay (sNeh) - 22.9 15.2 Approach LOS C C , Copydtht02006 University of Florida. All Ri9his Reserved HCS+m Version 5,21 Genemtedt 1214/2009 391 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1F9E.tmp 12/4/2009 Two-Way Stop Control Page I of 1 ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY &W4Ya(t"ntar nafton k Fi wx .,r 5[wim n`allo `ma, SS A. . Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & Marlene Ln/Driveway Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction - Town of Southold Date Performed 812612009 Analysis Year Build Analysis Time Period Saturday Midday Project Description AN09026 EastA/Vest Street: Mein Road NYS Rt 25 North/South Street: Marlene LaneAMest Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ' Major Street Eastbound Wastbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 845 23 62 572 15 ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 880 23 66 615 16 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - ' Median Type - Undivided RT Channelized 0 0_ Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 - 0 Configuration TR L TR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 - 8 9 - 10 11 .12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 2 5 55 3 50 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.88 0.88 0.88 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 5 65 0 3 56 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 ' Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR ' Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR TR ' v(vehih) 66 72 - 59 C (m) (vehih) 761 260 397 Vic 0.09 0.28 0.15 ' 96% queue length 0.28 1.10 0.52 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.2 24.1 15.6 LOS B C C ' Approach Delay (s/veh) = 24.1 15.6 Approach LOS C C Capyrighl 02005 uaversly of Ronde, All Righls Rese,ved HCS+T+ Vemlon521 Gewaled: 1214=09 3:02PM ' fle://C:\Documents and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1FAB.tmp 12/4/2009 I TECHNICAL APPENDIX i ATLANTIC TRAFFIC & DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. ,j HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS ' i Main Road & East Shopping Center Driveway i ' Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY WE)nt M- I'll "tat nff3, ~etron ti "~Cf Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & East Driveway ' Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 8/262009 Analysis Year Existing Analysis Time Period Weekday Midday ' Project Description AN09026 EastAllest Street: Main Road NYS Rt25 NorthlSoufh Street: East Shopping Center Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ' Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh(h 65 587 517 131 ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.91 0.91 D.91 fHo Fry Flow Rate, HFR 78 I I n Q I 568 l 143 ~+ehlh) ' Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channalized 0 0 Lanes 1 1- 0-- D 1 0 ' Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound ' Movement 7. 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume vehlh 77 39 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 1.00 0.70 0.70 0.86 0.83 0.86 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 _ 0 82 0 45 vehlh Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 2 2 0 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 ' Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR e L Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 70 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR ' v(veh/h) 78 - 127 C (m) (vehlh) 879 324 Vic 0.09 0.39 ' 95% queue length 0.29 1.80 Control Delay (sfveh) 9.5 23.1 LOS A C Approach Delay (sfveh) - 23.1 Approach LOS - - C ' Copyright 02005 UNVersity of Florida, Al Rights Reserved MCs4,,, Version 5.21 Generated: 12742008 5:55 PM file://C:1Documents and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2k24F3.tmP 12/412009 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & East Driveway Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 12/412009 Analysis Year No-Build Analysis Time Period Weekday Midday Project Description AN09026 EasWV88t Street: Main Road (NYS Rt25 North/South Street: East Shopping Center Driveway Intersection Orientation East-West - Stud Period hrs : 0.25 LIS Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4. 5 6 L T R L T R 'I Volume veh/h 67 652 611 136 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.91 0.91 0.91 , Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 80 785 0 0 671 149 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 ' Lanes - 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR ,II Upstream Signal 0 - 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 74 - 40 1j Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.70 0.70 0.86 0.83 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 86 0 - 46 vehih Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 2 2 -0 2 , Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N At Storage 0 0 RT Channelized Q 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Configuration LR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ! Movement 1. 4 7 8 9 10 Ill 12 Lane Config uration L v (veh/h) 80 C (m) (veh/h) 800 v/c 0.10 95%queue length 0.33 Control Delay (e/veh) 10.0 LOS A D Approach Delay (siveh) - 33.3 Approach LOS D ' Copyright ®2005 Unlarky of Florida, AY Rights Reserved HCS~ Verslon&21 Generated: 1214=09 3103PM file:#CADocuments and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1FB6.tmp 12/4/2009 I 'I Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY dial l'fo':° lrbon .„`,7.,'',e. ' :-a~° ,.sa tJ"nt 1fi3r`:. 'ya 1 $ Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & East Driveway - Agency/Co. ATOE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 121412009 Analysis Year Build Analysis Time Period Weekday Midday Project Description AN09026 EasVWesl Street. Main Road NYS Rt 25 Nonh/South Street: East Shopping Center Ddvewa Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Major Street Eastbound Westbound ' Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 67 640 31 25 600 136 ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.91 0.91 (vehlh) 0.81 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 80 771 37 27 659 149 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 - 5 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 i 0 ' Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 Mo~ ' L T R L T Volume veh/h 27 1 27 74 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.86 0.86 Houry Flo w Rate, HFR 30 1 86 1 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 ' Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Configuration LTR LTR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR ' v (vehfi) 80 27 61 133 C (m)(veh/h) 809 804 256 228 Vic 0.10 0 03 0.24 0.58 ' 95% queue length 0.33 0.10 0.90 3-29 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.9 9.6 23.4 40.8 LOS A A C E Approach Delay (s/veh) - - 23.4 40.8 Approach LOS C E Cepy6gh102005 UNv Iyof Flodde, AN Righm Reserved HCS**- VerSIM521 Generated: 12MOW 3:06PM file://C:\Docurnents and Settings%zintolka\Local Settings\Ternp\u2k1FC9.trnp 12/4/2009 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of I i 5 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ~,6 minfOQrlll~tCO i,aa"~k'-.a~~d%~m.`~x~<PV~U rw?py.na.?rW#rA~Q.,•nFr~YE~iI~•Ea~'rf'.-Y`Tt~+.l^i'~lc ..,r\r~.~v ~.'&?~F t, Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & East Driveway Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 8!16/2009 Analysis Year Existing Analysis Time Period Weekday Evening j Pro'ect Description AN09026 EastAlVest Street: Main Road NYS Rt 25 - Nodh/South Street: East Shopping Center Driveway Intersection Orientatlon: East-West Stud Period hrs 0.25 . ter' , . ><n ` , k t s, 6: Ma 'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veldh 64 628 642 92 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.83 0.91 0.85 0.85 Houdy Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 70 690 0 0 755 108 ' Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 ,i Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal - 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 - 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 51 34 ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 070 0.70 0.76 0.83 0.76 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 67 0 44 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehices 0 0 2 2 0 2 ' II Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Story e p 0 ' RT Channelized 0 - 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR ' va P1' t Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound j Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR ' v(vehih) 70 !11 C (m) (vehlh) 775 281 II, Vic 0.09 , 0.40 95% queue length 0.30 - 181 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.1 25.9 LOS B D ; Approach Delay (s/veh) 259 'I Approach LOS D Copy601 ®2005 Vdversity or Florida, All Rights Reserved HCs+n. versnn521 Generated: 1942009 5:55PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2k24F6.tmp 12/4/2004 ' Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 ' TWO WAYSTOPCONTROLSUMMARY °n rv., 1 L 01 Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd 8 East Driveway ' Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 121412009 Analysis Year No-Build Analysis Time Period Weekday Evening t Project Description AN09028 EastMest Street: Main Road NYS Rt 25 North/South Street: East Shopping Center Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs: 0.25 REM ' Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 66 692 731 95 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.83 0.91 0.85 0.85 Hour Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 1 72 780 0 0 859 fill Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 - 1 0 t Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound ' Movement - 7 a 1 9 10 11 12 _ L T R L T R Volume veh/h 53 35 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.70 0.70 0.76 0.83 0.76 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 69 0 46 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 2 2 0 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized - 0 0 ' Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR ' Approach. Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 t1 12 Lane Configuration L LR v(veh/h) 72 115 C (m) (veh/h) 706 227 vlc 0.10 0.51 ' 95% queue length 0.34 2.60 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.7 36.1 LOS B E ' Approach Delay (s/veh) - 36.1 Approach LOS E coprngl,o2005 Unlversa, MFbdda, All RIgMe Reserved Hcs. version 5.21 Genealed',_ 12/412009 3:04 PM ' file:8CADocuments and Settings%zimolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1FC0.tmp 12/4/2009 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of I 11 i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & East Driveway Agency/Co, ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 121412009 Analysis Year Build 'I Analysis Time Period Weekday Evening Project Description AN09026 East/West Street: Main Road NYS Rt 25 North/South StreeC East Shopping Center Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs: 0.25 Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 66 680 31 24 721 95 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 72 747 34 28 848 111 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 - 3 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 - 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR U Cream SI nai 0 - 0 'I Minor Street - Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 27 - 1 27 53 1 35 ,j Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.76 0.76 0.76 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR - veh/h 30 1 30 69 1 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2- 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage D 0 RT Channelized 0 0 'j Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR tai - Approach Eastbound Weslbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 jl Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (veh/h) 72 26 61 116 C (m) (veh/h) 713 832 221 203 v/c 0.10 0.03 0.28 0.57 95% queue length 0.34 0.10 1.08 311 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.6 9.5 27.4 44.0 LOS B A D E I Approach Delay (s/veh) 27.4 44.0 Approach LOS D E Copyright02005 UNversty or Fiodda, All Rights ResemeG - HCSaru Version 5.11 Generatetl: 12/412009 3:06 PM i i 1 i file://C:\Documents and Settings\bzimolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2klFCF,tmp 12/4/2009 i 'I Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY l~t~fi' WNW j Analyst BMZ Intersection Main Rd & East Driveway ' Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Dale Performed 8426x1009 Analysis Year Existing Analysis Time Period Saturday Midday Project Description AN09026 EastMtest Street: Main Road NYS Rt25 North/South Street: East Shopping Center Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stu Period hrs : 0.25 G ' Major Street 'Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 80 745 506 143 ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.83 0.91 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 83 776 0 0 544 153 t(v-~h/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 - 0 - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 1 1- 0 Lanes 1 1 -0 0 1 0 ' Configuration 1 T TR Upstream Signal 0 ;.0. Minor Street - Northbound Southbound ' Movement 7 8 9 10 it 12 - L T R L T R Volume eh/h 67 41 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 a70 0.70 0.87 0.83- 0.87 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 - 0 77 0 47 vah,h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 2 2 0 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 ' - Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR I 4 ' Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement .1 4 7 a 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L - LR ' v (veh(h) 83 - 124 C (m) (vehih) 904 311 v/c 0.09 0.40 ' 95% queue length 0.30 1.84 Control Delay (sfveh) 9.4 24.0 LOS A C ' Approach Delay (s/veh) - 24.0 Approach LOS C copyright 02005 University of Flocks, All Rights Re96Ned HCS,- version 5.21 Generated.. 12142009 5:55 PM ' file:11C:\Docurnents and Settings\bzinnolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2k24F9.tmp 12/4/2009 Two-Way Stop Control Page I of I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst SMZ Intersection Main Rd 8 East Driveway Agency/Co. AIDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Ali Date Performed 121412009 Analysis Year No-Build Analysis Time Period Saturday Midday Pro ect Descri tion NNO9028 Easti l i Street: Main Road NYS Rt 25 North/South Street: East Shopping Center Drivewa 'j Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 K+ car Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6~ L T R L T R t Volume (veh/h 83 792 587 148 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.83 0.9f 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (vehih) 86 825 0 0 631 159 I I I 1 1 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type - Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes i 1 0 0 1 0 i Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal - 0 0 lip Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L. T R 'i Volume veh/h89 42 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 1.00 0.70 0.70 0.87 0.83 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 79 0 48 vehih Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 2 2 0 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N ! Storage 0 0 ' RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 4 7 10 11 1 ' 1 8 9 2 Lane Configuration guration L LR v (veh/h) 86 127 ' C (m)(veh/h) 835 259 Vic _ 0.10 0.49 95% queue length 0.34 2.51 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.8 31.6 LOS A D Approach Delay (s/veh) 31.6 11 Approach LOS D Copytlghtc 2005 DNwmty ornwa, Ali Rights Reserved HCS~TM VaN1.5.21 Generated: 12142009 3:05PM 'I file://C:\Documents and Settings%zimolka\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1FC5Amp 12/4/2009 'I Two-Way Stop Control Page i of 1 ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst BMZ 3 Intersection Main Rd & East Driveway Agency/Co. ATDE Jurisdiction Town of Southold Date Performed 121412009 Analysis Year Build Analysis Time Period Saturday Midday Pro ecl Deedri Lion AN09026 t East/West Street Main Road NYS Rt 25 North/South Street: East Shopping Center Driveway Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud -Period hrs : 0.25 ' Ma'or Street Eastbound A Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h 83 785 32 25 579 148 ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 86 I 817 33 1 26 I 622 1 159 Percent Heavy Vehicles1 _ 0 _ _ ' Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 ' Configuration L TR L 7R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound ' Movement 7 8 g 10 11 12 L 7 R L T R Volume veh/h 27 1 25 69 1 43 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.87 0.87 0.87 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 30 1 27 79 1 49 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N Storage 0 N 0 RT Channelized 0 0 ' Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR ' v(veh/h) 86 26 58 129 C (m)(veh/h) 841 797 239 231 vfc 0.10 0.03 0.24 0.56 ' 95% queue length 0.34 0.10 0.92 3.06 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.8 9.7 24.8 38.7 LOS A A C E ' Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.8 38.7 Approach LOS C E Copyright®2005 university of rfond.,Ali Rights Reserved HCS~ Version 5,21 Generated: 12/42009 3:07PM t' 1 file://C:\Documents and Settings\bzirnolka\Loca1 Settings\Temp\u2k1FD4.tmp 12/4/2009 11 ? / tirva 19.77 I]W TO 19.35 "'f46.00 V x18.58 SITE LOCAT N N 48.57'30" E 5.%76 ~~Nf~( .OCATION $ mat'AS1jEm PROP. 20' X 10' TRASH ROPOSED CHAIN UNB' RICH SECURITY SHADED AREA INDICATES PROPS CU. TO. TRAS 1.5 CU. TO. TRASH SEPTIC I',: r r n' 1 CHAIN UNN FENCE GRADE TO BE FlLLED IN. 1 ENCLOSUR{ ON C~fYC3, CONTAINER TYP. P I ~ I I I I.1 'AINER (TYP.) 134 GPO x 2 DAYS = 268 GALLONS j fll' N~+~ Sr_w`' ` ` L~ 'll 1 a r KEMPEY ENGINEERING ROP. 1500 COMPACT FILL MATERIAL, EL 24,39 El 2170 2 .1 ) GALLON CREASE TRAP TO 95S MAX. DENSITY. PROP. BOLLARD ROPOSEO 6• HIGH SECURE 3SE0 6- HIGH SECURITY I ~Yk 9i a. * V 'J t l I r j II . / WIWWWO D O DI . 5' DM AI.) MAIN CUUNK FENCE OADRAIL WITH W&4 GUARRO9u~wml Wae.5 In 1i;^1t{ill ia1~111TT dlJl ul I ' 1i hl :I 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY gE 99N POST EVERY 6'-3' O.C. HEM OLEO. _ EVEWE'-3.O.C. PROVIDED: (1) 1200 GAL. SEPTIC TANK (8' DIAM. gggg x 4' LIQUID DEPTH) Nl IIIr41 >F a ~~M r9k 111 rti , I , 'I0~'.92 a ,111199 III r nI i t ~1r~rl ~ 1vs F 1.~ ~ "~I .i _ METER MF.1EN _ WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 BC .1 7 m [LEACHING x TC 2 .90 w BC 2 ,40 24.90 °00L 10 PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SF L J L _ C 24 y0 24.40"1rn1 11 li~l~-~f i1j 'aP J~A job ~u: kl i 1 II R ti~ III GREASE TRAP + 61 P: 631.321.7777 If L 46 5• M, E^^a •'4 ^'~1N 1O FIWwE6 O CONVENIENCE STORE AREA- 2275 S.F.) O PROF. STACKED 2 STAG Wo[ k . / Km RCP. SMd9m (I~~N ~~I 1 j l1~~1 II ~~~Ij'1 hG ~1Pj1~ l y < II r 1 F: 631.661.0486 5Q 5' e~ w E wpm r S R!,'!0 RET. NO WALL SEE WE \tX A~\'(1P Ay 111Excx wlw I w'{~- -w ~ olT. ON SP-3 % ETNNINO WALL SEE 54 GPD x 1 DAY = 54 GALLONS MIN. REQ'D. t Ilh JI'~ I~s .~4rII + 1•'I 7 111~IV I~~If 41 ET.ONSP-3 x18.25 x17.75 .w,9 i~~~if m1JG4 ~Y11111 A~1 ~I~~li:)}Iy l0.'{Iiil fr', J4 h ;i `p G"~~_~{,,Tt \~P~ • y ` ROP. 1200 I T'om' A~ SHADED AREA INDICATE! a DEBTO BE IPUB. 1n. PROVIDED: 1) 1500 GAL. GREASE TRAP 8' k'1lfC'I I ll 111 ii, lplaluii~lj~'(illl' r' r r~ IIr A I 'VI ^~dQ 1 I 11 OMPACT Flu MAERI0. 1 4 ~ IN~1 1111 S~ (N ~R I~ I lA 0 95x M. DENS".. DIAM. x 5' LIQUID DEPTH MIN. REQUIRED) ~T 11 F iu it R f rr r4 ~ v. i 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE 9~`0' G'Y- O' ~Y y I GAL SEPTC \ WAT m GRADE TO BE FILLED R ..a1 `YO eCX' P ~ R / O TANN COMPACT FILL MATERIAL ST,McV 9sx' E+ ROP, E I \ / L TO 965 MAX. DENS". aly 1 1LII. . r9h h i l i i I i l' EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 v ea,\y SIX YEf. ]{q POOL /PRG / :U/. A POLE ITT SIGN6GE, LCOMPACT WEMOUNTFO Ir5 JH+111 iJS11 ff)1 IIWII rl I tir J~til fiJI ~~I WAGE COMPACT !J,pifa ~N VF I , 1(11 J ,ir v h {III'" ',III I y!.',iL 9 V J CARS ONLY (01Y, 3) s~~0\\ gipEX . GO i G~yLy s. 9 A B P ARE ONLY Ott. 3 1 . 1 .i r 1 Y e LEACHING POOL ~r1rSh. 1 9 1d X111 rd YIrv IJ 11 f II I I idyll rI I r I P Ili ~t r P. 631.368.3324 Be 2x6 EL. .61 685 SF, PR POSED ADDITION J A s P H P a~+~' ~I~ ~3 w~ 4a ~ II'V.~i 1,r I I Ili I I I I ecN3 es. V'IIs .•,1STe1n P se F. 631.368.1524 Q (22.86 LTC/ 1D0 TC ulrt, R' 6' D, LP. INMG. ~~Ilail'rii}- in A 134 GPD / 1.5 GAL/DAY/SF = 89.3 SF ry~ s f p~ "B Health mangy I 'f 1 1 ,(1 ~I `Pi IL I l i t ifi i iE41~I~i lljib I~ k 'I JVIII h a Itr1 i W' 4' ~ 9„~ ~ I pept s u h n 1' r:l mT~?N 8y~,y EXISTING: (2) 8' DIAM. x 7' EFFECTIVE DEPTH LEACHING 6;, r~ .r lI t I~ III [~Itp gRR I. C 24.3 "ATM' ) T REVISIONS: 24.4 C 24, 4 SIG a or 1 iBOd~~iL~ '~7~R a FIEG As POOLS II' ' AIRIti ?r, n~~i;~III ~~y g1 R ROSS ACCESS IF o N' NN4O BC 24.24 N REfljIV TRED'.6~- TC 25.00 / N EX15ION01l IN 2EfljIV KEY MAP -XI5TIN01.6l ING WALL TO BE PROTECTED EXIST. POOLS PROVIDE 25.13 SF/VF X 14 VF= 352 SF 2 Date Description No. Npe G91m Z LIMP IS NO y/ --DURING CONSTRU( )ITRING CONSTRUCTION. > 300 SF MIN. REQUIREMENT a \ S / OD POSE EVERY 5--3. 1 -T-31 WARDRNL BATH Wl SP-1 POST EVERY 5•-3. D.C. x 15,80 DENSITY: 8/06/09 SUBMITTAL TO SCDHS 4~ J\ RP s °i BC 24.25 BC 23.50 0 1 P k+$ TC 2 .75 P OP. T,O.G. ROP. "7-11" WOOD CARVED IN WALL SIGN W/ GOOSENECK / PR OSED 1" DIP PR oseD T^ DIAM. SCHEDULE K 600 GPD/ACRE x 0.55 ACRES = 330 GPD > 134 GPD 5/7/10 SUBMITTAL TO SCDHS BC 24.25 I\ I 22.75 LIGHTING .(//10. • N CO ER WATER S CO ER WATER SERVICE 6/25/10 SUBMITTAL TO SCDHS BC 24.5 IST. 1 PR0MWR L PROPOSED LOCATON OF FUTURE CROSS 7/01/10 SUBMITTAL TO SCDHS ` O m 2 0 G 110. ox ACCESS TO QQQ$ E e' 0P. PROP. T.O.G. C 23.25 PROPERTY ACCESS TO N AGENT PROPERTY / oq 6.1 IE' G C SIDEIN To SSE [MOMEO D INLET EL. 22.50 gC 22.75 ro TO 20.02 146.00 LIST OF DRAWINGS: $Wb 1 3 $IG66GE EMPLOYEE \ O IST. GUARDRAIL TO BE R! / N 48.57'30" E 146.00 cWRDRAIL TO BE REMOVED - - - N+' PARKING ONLY (ON .11 nr PROF. MONIIx Q9 TC 23.25 TO zo.4D ALlmu ` ~9-ELkVEN' SON TC 25 20 BC 22.75 \•pp ENTER• PROP. STACKED RETANINC ' . STACKED flEiNNINC WAIL SEE ON SP-] ~6,~ pW /v`vv~ W C $EE MAL ~ BC 24 70 C 4.90 swx I .I DET. ON SF-3 n BC 23 35 Sheet Description Peo •2N SM". OBDILATON 3 BC 23.00 25.98 im wn ELI T'S"IN 2$ BC 23.0 ~mm r PW 9 ~3g .00 5 f / n.N MIMS INP6WEYFM] ~ ~ 2Y55 _ 14 N.,, ~ENMNG A 2b% NI f3R A HD-1 -KEY MAP lf~ IU Xq$JB- • 1 ff `A,' %T yry2y,,~, Ilf. 250704152695 ~W TW ISM M O PAOl TDLLL BUIMNO MG 1,570 4 NO MA M 19 ,G q Yy (CONYENEHLE STORE NEA. 2175 S.F.) / 17041525.95 i 4 SITE PLAN 0 FXISTNO CMB curro BE 48 57 30 YY 24.32 138.00 EL .4] Rm 22.50 ONlll AN PATCHED i0 ~GW1 xomsm k AlV FMIINO SEE NOTE/ EL 24.°4' 'S10P' 96V. % P OPOSm SANITARY CALCULATIONS C R 0 5 9 W A L N EL 24.20 EL 21~19y % 2251 MGM. 26.28 Be 25,85X A5 •MI IIMAFp I{~3T3 % L , / TO 21.01 Z I~ ' A v / \ / / 6~/_J SANITARY DETAILS 26.16 96N J O'LILCx 226 . 1GPrs2o Y111AWCE BE MARKER Lr• SIGN 25 OJ04 1529 X11 _ " DEMOLITION SITE PLAN GRMB. TO TO 26.10 % % 4. mow' d015 •ml TC 22 Po HSI S .M. MGN MMMM, UP]4MMMH,R 4 BE T-10' WOE 07 "EMMING l!MI EXIST S ,BD NYf p44 %BL, p KIST. .1 KIST. SI 58• P DI 01 MUE WV RNMEE D' 15 m 077E 1sws7 21 99 LINER, i 2fi.96 26 R O $ $ W L 2114 E WEE EACH DmotATIM FOR BC 24.60 p ,p NO 13NTRY 20. 213.82 FIMRE TURNING - 1 L 20.84 o c DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL: Rl91us IxFRIwEYENIS k a UNE B 23.65 C 21A2 _ 5°I91PLImGm au Tx[°X _ QDBC 20.43 M4 .SJ TO PUBLIC lTf (d _ WATER MNN 9$ - I O ` `'Y~ • _ • WTIII LINE 1.29 1.29 3 'R CyZ IB o WHI1E DNE A I (WIDTH VARIER) eai I~EIIM 2ro °PAVD6 NKRE - SHOULDER y ® EXI: r. EL TANIKS 0' r. FUEL TANKSO n 24.97- --ROAD (S. R. 25) DNE9 WOE MAN CLOSED SIW C TO I TOSBEUR MOVED DI TO BE REMOV 3E REMOV = u ( 26.92 % In nA- 2T o5 by A G I I I 1 SITE PLAN 4cct.P 0 ALL SITE INFORMAGIW IS BASED UPON k I P-1 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" ' A suRMET A SURVEY DAM 02/15/05, JOB NO. 051313, BY. ° IF YOLLMU Eµ We •no••.4~n I - - 993 N - _ D1GmGDUxG-1N1G NmmnNa 8.57'301, w `•ky„T. 198.00 NOTES:P 1. THERE ARE NO SURFACE WATERS WITHIN 300' 0117 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. RmW ~WiNMM Y. 11n1 1139 2. THERE ARE NO WATER SUPPLY WELLS WITHIN 150' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. LL~_" ~V' r Suffolk County Department of Health Services Approval for Construction - Other Than Single Family DATUM: USGS- NGVD 1929 NxnG uR RNNN M 1 \3•LFA IL (S.R. 25) Reference No- AC In - f) -!1 X -7 -7 p Des~yign Flow LEGEND SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS 2 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN Dse(s) / ~l [ yr9~ ~ro aio G.~' 0 Q ,r5/• W These plans have been reviewed for general conf anc with Suffolk TOTAL SCALE: 1/32N=P-aN County Deparhnnt of Health Services standards, relating to water supply TC = TOP OF CURB AREA AREA DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN T( and sewage disposal. Regardless of any omission, incohsislences Or lack FLOW BY - - - - - - of detail, eemuuction is requined to be in accordance with the attached BT = BOTTOM OF CURB FLOW VV FLOW FLOW Fl SPACE: ~ permit Conditions and applicable eandartls unless specifically waived by 24.05 the DePkIMUL Thle approval expires 3 years tram the a All date. EL = ELEVATION NAME SIZE SANITARY: GREY: TOTAL: SI X un~ssexterttdedoremeenxl ,41 / ppr 01 I 24y 2 ¦ = MONUMENT j Sf 134 gdp / ° " A provdD~m evisw - = DRAINAGE FLOW CONVENIENCE 2,670 0.03 gpd/sf 0.02 gpd/sf 10.05 gpd/sf 1 J I STORE SF =80 gdp =54 gdp =134 gdp UTILITY POLE / PROP. 1500 GAL. TRAFFIC BEARING GREASE TRAP ;REASE TRAP ~a~~,~ 0 ENGINEER'S.CERTIFILU1Ul4WUXW-MV Q 23.90 O O X 24.168 (8' DIAM, 5' LIQ. DEPTH) / INV. El. PROP. 11', 4"0 SDR35 PVC / PVC These plans are an Instrument of INV EL 22.01 (1/4" PER FT. SLOPE) service and are the property of the _ 21.51 \ 25.24 INV. EL. 22.24 X 2 X Engineer. Infringements will be (I 24.63 prosecuted, 23 . . X10 i / 24.82 X Contractors shall verify all field conditions and dimensions and shall be responsible for field fit and INV. EL. quality of work. No allowances w/ \ y INV. EL. i 20.44 0 a shall be made on behalf of the .'.r, r' iWbm QIWL N'cbtla WlST lIG1110?tblL lO.tR Contractor for anyerror or neglect D h EXIST. 8' DIA. x J O I ° 22'24 /i 7' ED LEACHING NEW on his part 1 r~ ae nx '-o' M1L aMrc fr M'y I M/M1Y[!C / POOL TO REMAIN \\X HOUSE CONVENIENCE STORE AREA 12,670 SF) a '2,670 SF) Project (NO BASEMENT) ar rrrr rr rrra EL 23.69OP~s 0. 4 TRAP SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION (NO BASEMEN' 0'~ a (1 STORY) FIN. FUR. 25.41' OWNER: GAMA_DEER PARK, INC. a.ar ar rasa ~ ~~_e• r r aaaa 3'-e' ra arar eIIN. pIN. r a a a r r CAST IRON FRAME AND F. rar rr as - a r a r r- CASTTTI FRAME AND INSECTTIGHT LOCKING FUTURE INV. EL. PROP. 15„ 4110 OLD BROOKVILLE,NY Firi PR w r r r a r r r INSECT TIGHT LOCKING I r COVER TO GRADE COVER TO Gnaoe EXPANSION 20.53 : SDR35 PVC (1/4"' FINISHED GRADE INV. EL. PER FT. SLOPE) j 320 FROST POND ROAD OJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. MAIN RD. & FACTORY rar rrar 2P r.e•".w \3~7„ I 21.03 O O r r 24 1W'u. r a r r r r r TRAFFIC SLATE 2a' t• r;7:...;• 0• 1\\_'~/I 2IN0V.. 53 20• 2 EL. INV. EL. 21.93 i AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY caLAR TRAFFIC SLAB xo' za' 7e 3~. ' OUTLET / Q Mra INTBilI1 + MIN. 4" DIAMI. SDR35 F1tOM KTCCHEN FLOW LNE MIN 4" PITCHED 1/4":l' w Lmx TO SEPTIC TANK PVC PIPE EN FLOW LWE MIN. 4"DIAM. SDR35 4, lb ^q1°'aTNen^ ay,J MIN. 4"DIAM PITCHED EQUIVAI•EMF PITCF~D it I \l w Il4":I' o ' PIPE OREQUIVALENf aQ Mh`OQ4' PROP. 1200 GAL. PITCHED I/8":1, SEPTIC TANK SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP ('FfILIMiMI MO MiWL 1/8"'1' INV. EL. 2 v y (4' LIQUID DEPTH) / e' ouw. ~ ° 20.44 DIST. SEC. BILK. LO Y _ -MONOLITIBC .I 1000 142 01 27 f I 'Np,Ee EXIST. COVER EL. / 1. 1M11.1A O WI! W3VIFV XPN M1WL~ M10LLLL Fd1f a11YlL LRIIL = 23.81 1T M94LL'd WINWYIIG 9W1 MaW~'Nf]II]f0A WI01 PAVE N Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. (uLTm ou~.a rvnw~n .ue mo PI/ /wu w4 yu Po b e•-o- I ~ 8•-D• DM. s (22.86) EXIST. 8' DIA. x e'-e" pAM. 7' ED LEACHING POOL TO REMAIN Scale: AS NOTED HD-1 CAL SEPTIC TANK 6 SANITARY SYSTEM PLAN s LEACHING POOL DETAIL q TYPICAL GREASE TRAP 5 CYLINDRICAL SEP' -0„ SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Drawn by: M.C. SCALE: NTS SCALE: NPS SCALE: Z' = 1'-0" 1 ' ~I f it KEMPEY ENGINEERING PARKING CALCULATIONS REQUIRED DRAINAGE 3E SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS AREA NAME AREA SIZE CODE REQ. REQUIRED PROPOSED 7 CF/VF = 40.57 V.F. AREA AREA DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN P CONVENIENCE STORE GROSS 2774 CU,FT. / 68.37 CF/VF = J TOTAL FLOOR RETAIL AREA, COUNTER 2,275 SQJ I 1 SPACE/100 SQ.FT, 23 SPACES 26 SPACES PACE & STORAGE AREA E FLOW FLOW FLOW Fl FLOW BY 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY , EXISTING DRAINAGE SPACE: WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 # INCLUDING (1) HANDICAP PARKING SPACE (3) p 10' DIA. X 8' DEEP = DEEP= 3 x 8' =24 V. F. NAME SIZE SANITARY: GREY:; TOTAL: S P: 631.321.7777 3E CONVENIENCE 2,670 0.03 gpd/sf 0.02 gpd/sf 0.05 gpd/sf /Sf 134 gdp F: 631,661.0486 SITE DATA PROVIDED DRAINAGE DEZ = 3 x 8' = 24 V. F. STORE SF =80 gdp =54 gdp', =134 gdp 1 P 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE ITEM AMOUNT % (3) ® 10' DIA. X 8' DEZ = ORIGINAL PLOT SIZE 24,140 SQ.FT. TOTAL DRAINAG (0,55 ACRES) 48 V.F. CALCULATIONS FOR STORM WATER RUN-OFF RETENTIO :TENTION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 P. 651,368.3324 DEDICATED AREA (INCL. SOME 249 SORT, X AREA RUN-OFF COEFF. FT. OF RAIN ` CU.FT.RETENTION I !ETENTION REQ'D F. 631.368.1524 LANDSCAPE AREA) PAVEMENT 12,836 SQ.FT. 0.9 0.17 1964 CU.F 1964 CU.FT. REVISIONS: FINAL PLOT SIZE 23,891 SQ.FT, 100 GN,~wAH a k~ j LANDSCAPE 8,385 SQ.FT. 0.25 0.17 356 CU.F 356 CU.FT. Date Description No. BUILDING AREA 2,670 SQ.FT. 11.18 a BUILDING 2,670 SQ.FT. 1.0 0.17 454 CU.F' 454 CU. FT. 10/10108 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK/CURB ARE 12,836 SQ.FT. 53.72 IUFFCLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HJrE 2774 CU.F 2774 CU.FT. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS R SUFFOLK COUNTY DEP iERNCE5 TO DETERMINE THE CY DATED 03/13/08 / a } O OF THE GANI TOTAL LANDSCAPING/ BUFFER 8,385 SQ,FT. 35.10 F THE ES EXIS IN EflMll u 7 THIS SYSTEM M IS IS OEENI ]F THE E%ISBNG SANITARY SYIF PHIS SYSTEM IS BEEMm INAD, A AREA NEW ISANITMY NSTALLED IN COMPUA B APPLICABLE REWLATI SANITARY SYSTEM SHALL N/F 4EW NSTALLm IN C TOTAL 23891 SQ.FT. 2774 CU.F 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 2774 CU. FT. RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE APPLICABLE NST RELATIONS. AS. AREA MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC 1 W THIS VEGETTATON ATION THAT IS TED x l]AS INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD UNDEVELOPED AREA 0 SQ. FT, 0 b NANRAL WGETAnON / BY THIS WORK SHALL FOLLOWNG NEW TANK 3Y THIS WORN SHALL BE LANDSCAPED TO 15.73 NLLOWNG NEW TANK INSTALLBC 16]2 ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) x17.75 x 17.41 K ST~ LO EXISTING 8' RETAINING EXISTING RETAININGe" CONCUSE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER 1e.9z TE LOCATION 4/13/09 FROM VIS THE AS INPERCO3/RP24/09TOWN COMMENTS WALL ALONI WALL ALONG NORTA S P H A L T P A R K I N G PROPERTY LINE ~ WW ?•I~g'~oT~''y TC 19.3 ¦W 1g.77 ~•I 46.00 x 1 If BC 10.7 15.80 8 57 30 hil ,SUR ON C SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. ZONING INFORMATION / ML13 PROPERtt 21.00 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 SCTM#'S: STREET ADDRESS: 9945 MAIN ROAD, MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NY ti g N 8'57'3 RICT: B-GENERAL BUSINESS GRATE 8 RAT Gn"L-'SCAT cN ZONING LANDSCAPE DIST FRONT YARD REQUIRED: 4,193 SQ.FT. IP W. 1=ENE ROPOSED 5SECURITY SHADED AREA INDICATES PROP 20' X 10' TRASH PROPS W. TO. TRASH 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD ENCLO rL• u!''YT a u . H ENCE GRADE ID BE FILLED IN. CONTAINER P. -w',kl1 'r r I,r COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 LANDSCAPE FRONT YARD PROPOSED: 5,420 SQ.FT, PO TANK 100D COMPACT FULL MATERIAL, EL 24.39 EL 23.70 2 .I ) TO 959 W. DENSITY. P. d({ I "S a t,,v, ,X I'' ` % s4 ' ~rhy," 1 T'.') ,+,F" N CREASE PROP. BOLLARD PROPOSED 5' RICH SECURITY PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE REQUIRED TO BE IN FRONT YARD: 50% ( T~ 1N GUARDRAILCWITH W8ASA POST EVER! W-3" O.C. - t 1 vEA ;9 rIL 1R 'U . 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE PROPOSED TO BE IN FRONTYARD: 64.64% ""0SD 1 0 0 o G WN ELEC. METER C .BO TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SF L J L BC 2 .40 hy, COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 40'-0" ~ WSTI. lEXCHWO / S, FRONT YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 77'-1" ' BC 2281 fom TC 24.90 CE STORE AREA= 2275 S.F.) I BC 24.40 0 PROP STACKm - - DEETTAION SS~' SEE x 0.23 % SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 15--0" i H EL, PRO LIST OF DRAWINGS: SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 49'-2 1 23 TO (Col REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 25'-0" EcKoum. w"WN,o , REAR YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 21'-8" IY - Sheet Description /LgADING/ / 17.75 SHIDED MEA IXpCATE5 ^ OWE TO BE FILLED IN. I T+• TOM TPACT /~Z) IV xls~aGi Flu 959 MA%. D 91111'µ. 14 111 y g " ' SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN CURRENT USE: GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE N 2 °i l IH mC."IN, 1'1 ou. 00 -PARKING CALCULATIONS 4AGEHOP / m &.1 ACT CARS ONLY (Dn. SF. POSED DI 10N yEE/TT `EIS A S P H A L T P A R K I N 0 aI PROPOSED USE: 7-ELEVEN CONVENIENCE STORE , .6 is DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS T BG 22.5 EXI COVE -SANITARY CALCULATIONS EL 238;1 / TC 25.00 2 KEY MAP e' D. LP. SC 24,50 SP-1 -ZONING ANALYSIS ~ C 3 1 (22.86) "11 W~ p0 0 ° 24.36 24. EXISTING 8P CONCRETE RETAINING WALL ALONG 24.4 C 4, 4 RD . "ATM EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE TO BE MODIFIED AS SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN 24. 4 C 24, 4 WIN OW SIG TC 24.74 REQUESTED TO CONSTRUCT CROSS ACCESS IF •LANDSCAPESCHEDULE LEGEND Q i kYT A B . / REQUIRED. -LANDSCAPE NOTES MW W T' S o TC = TOP OF CURB ~ e , iCA' oo za b KN n EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. T-31 c 01 Wa,S.s POST EVERY ERY 41-3* OD• % 18.90 STRIPE .STANDARDS -STANDARD COLORS 3M FILM MA IRS $M FILM MATERIAL SP-3 -SITE DETAIL BT = BOTTOM OF CURB mQ = © P. m BC' 24.25 BC 23,50 7 O EXIST. A P OP. T.O.G. ROP, 7-11" WOOD CARVED A-RED C• GREEN IN ET WALL SIGN W1 GOOSENECK 3660-53 (CARDINAL RED) 3860.5E (DARK GREEN) 'REED SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN EL = ELEVATION k~ s,PE, is 24.75 BUILDING Q Bc 24.25 E 22.75 `LIGHTING ,/!tD e. g EQUIVALENT PMS#1797 EQUIVALENT PMS/342 iS S 342 L ¦ = MONUMENT 14 4 7 - DRAINAGE FLOW Bc 24.54 _ , 1 AVERY N 10836.7-11 RED AVERY N 10835-711 GREEN T If GREEN SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY _ Exlsr. -EXIST. PROPOSED LOCATION OF NNRM E CROSS AD,JACENi B-ORANGE D- WHITE p 0 ~10' P • EL 2 .0 e' D. LP, PROP. T.O,C. C 23.25 ACCM PROPERTY 3823 (BRIGHT ORANGE) PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN = i UTILITY POLE z .o c 6.1 E A INLET EL. 22.50 C 22.75 EQUIVALEINTPMSPIS6 E-BRONZE TO xo.ox AVERY 0 $0837.711 ORANGE PANTONE 19.1116 1 NEW G005ENECK 51GN A- L -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS ,Q~I 13 11GG.ue. ~E,... EMPLOYEE LIGHT WITH ANGLE ~_1 PARKINO ONLY (M.. 3 (nl II OUST. TE. "91'15 , II KT, OWRORNL TO BE RFNOVED ~I OF 1 er no _ TC 24.4Q 5 I~MW %oDoDEoT'.`JT-5P KEO Num WNL SEE M 2 0.40 B 23 40 J BC 23.0 p.3qq, 200gg055 ~TVWy~ ?p ~ g NEW 2 1/4' THICK WOOD A-2 'EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS DATUM: USGS- NGVD 1929 BC 2470 PANEL- WHITE- WITH CARVED mR~km` £,n PROP. U TC 25.20 1,IV~SEE DETAILS 25.98 2" 5a." PEaICATICN 7-11 SIGNAGE WITHIN R/LWB NRRaIEYENR 3 1 26,65 _ m n' RbA w :OB BW 19-.70 7 4w EX " OU'TaBE 48°57'30 W ENOYID I!N PAW.05 TO M. 2 El DOING MNER 30YV 9432198.00 EL .47 "'p tlG]010RRA{ M. 24.54 22.50 ~ % !Ra•osm B A These plans are an instrument of - NEW 10" 5QUARE WOOD H NIRInNa SEE NWE Am~T¢p _ % +nExox owx L 42p 22.31 GXtx¢ T$ O,OM4 1029 C N COLUMNS- WHITE- WITH 12" service and are the property of the Engineer. Infringements will be LOO G'PS4rP11gx M. m 21.01 WGN ]Canal % 22.e1 MILE MAW. , % d 2 MOIGAm 11® OXLY il w SQUARE 6TONE BASE, TO n conditions and dimensions and TC 28,71 TO 2610 X X b, a 4.5 4.5 {p eN T3M RDNI MWO DGN• .50 EpST. BIN WV D MATCH BUILDING prosewted' TO 26 BC 25.2] 225 V04 IARKER CA-ST i v m zB•ez E Contractors shall verity all field 28.95 25.39 IJ,TER OMCATON PER BC 24.51) 4.0 ENTRY ~C 21.51 % n NNRE NRNKO yl RADW IMPROVEMENTS Z Y LIN e 23.0 c 2&30 zyy.u 4 EEpp C 22.92 ®BC 2CA3 shaltereeponsible for field fit and 4 quality of work. No allowances 5 N 61GN 4gALER L [ , BJ 2-'-7- shell be made on behalf of the DEL YELLOW LINE X 9 WHITE LINE (WIDTH 1 (WIDTH VMI[S) R Q AD [I Contractor for anyanor or neglect 4 20.1 F '24.90 2D KHIT LINE p S.R. 25) CLMED cLasEO9cx on his part SEAL X 2B.9R DR N ,104 eD9L 0 LIN NEW'ELDORADO' STONE, MNITE LINE X25,2 ~r.T U R N I N B L A N E NANTUCKET 5TYLE WITH Project) PRECA5T CONCRETE CAP., MOP LINE TO BE SET DBL YELLOW LINE C L OW E 21.5] TO MATCH BUILDING r NRTHER SICK TO 'CONORMTE FOR PEDESTRIAN CROSSWW.Y. s (NY500T R.O.W.) %20.4e 25.23 28.0 WHITE LINE (ROUTE 25) OWNER: VAMA DEER PARK, INC. 25'25 Be 26 B9 BC 25.05 BC 25.54 RB TO 25. 4.43 (VARIABLE WIDTH) MITE .1b., TC 24.33 320 FROST D---- PLANTER AREAS ON EACH I BIDE Of OLD BROOKVILLEINY 32 24, 32 BC Bc 24.De SIDE OF SIGNAGE (G'-4° x 6" 'T P5.15 ~UP EACH) NEW'ELDORADq'STONE, PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC., it 1 0 'IR\ v STOP LINE WIN `mmm~ Mo IDt A~ 0 ¢ON MMFD - NANTUCKET STYLE MAIN RD. & FACTORY, 6 aiu AVENUE u NOTE. HE L THERE ARE NO CURB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE n PRECAST CONCRETE CAP MATTITUCK, NY ADJACENT PROPERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD, AND MARLENE LANE J NLW21/4"THICK WOOD SUFFOLK COUNTY TA - NA.P--.. PANEL- WHITE- WITH CARVED DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT 7-1 1 SIGNAGE WITHIN V i 2 1000 142 01 27 2 4? ~5L J 7-1 1 WOOD 5TREET SIGN . t SIGN W/ Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. A 4 3 G005ENECK FIXTURE \E 1 SITE PLAN SP-1 SCAM pax - 1'-0[ P-1 SCALE: 1°=20(-0(( Scale: AS NOTED Spassas I A WRY A 6URY DAM 02/16/06, " N0. 0601], aY: ~VOLLMUTFL R musty FMpKfllw°-WN °"RAVIK MJ 4F ,°RR LL91E Drawn by: M.C. II i LANDSCAPING NOTES : C Ia 1. COVERALL PLANTDIGBEDS WITH A MINIMUM OF T' THICKNESS OF HARDWOOD MULCIL KEMPEY ENGINEERING PIMA" di~'(-• ~r RY I' I, J•I....WMC KIiLL kli 2. AT PLANTING BEDS IN PARKINGAREAS AND AREAS OF REQUIRED TRAFFIC VISIBILITY USE LDWPROFILBPLANTINGS. (PLANTINGS. t ••1A 3. DURINGLOCAL GROWING SEASON, OWNER SHALL PURCHASE AND PLANT ANNUAL FLOWERING PLANTS AS REQUIRED IN AS RIQUERED INPLANTINO BIDS TP x w. rwx E KIML OF STyHNG TIE •~rrf _ez CLOSE GAPS IN PLANTING AREAS AND TO ADD COLORAND VARIETY TO LANDSCAPING. Yr 1 ~.xxpY Mk ~f~ 1', ~ i11 4. PROVIDENEW IN-GROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT ALL REAS OF LANDSCAPING AS REQUIRED BY CODE, 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY xmm~u¢-~ I I RwrN Cx'Y YxC-^ / J a'""iE'.••n 1 , nJN.z YnW LrR .i J i 5. STREET TREES. STREET TREES WITH AMINIMUM CALIPER OF FOURINCHES SHALL BEPLANTED AND/ORMAINTAIJED AD ROAD FRONTAGES IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 30 FEET ON CENTER MAINTAINED ADIACENT TO ALL WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 aTBR- P: 631.321.7777 [ AMENDED 2-10-404, EFFECTIVE 3-1.20041 1 _ _ _ ...0TJwJxG :YtmxrJ ~a~ I' i r, (N PARKINGAREA SCREENING. ALL PARKING AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH AHEDGB, BERM AND/ORDECO: FENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS. M AND/ORDBCORATIVB WALL OR F: 631.661.0486 . u 3. iLLIT.uu- _tTl ' €(~•~€^Ym«I.YY ? €TI,u_i. 7. DECORATIVE OFF-STREET PARKING LOT LIGHTS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED. INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. rAINW. 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE ~.m,...._. L._.._.. - Y ui~ Rieu $r*I S TRE; 100m1 0P8CITR01 S. OFF-STREET PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE NONADJUSTABLE HORIZONTALLY MOUNTED FDLT ORES WITH LESS CARES WITH LESS THAN EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 owc TV! F"Iff IB Tm i4mw m IEITKATT W10 t/ NINETY DEGREE LUMINAI03 CUTOFF. i y.. 11 x2xmNn V"x..AO. G•RmS "x e fY xYm u. xJ6 F~.: FDaIMES THAT PROJECT LIGHT OR GLARE TOWARD THE STRUT RIGHT-ORWAY OR ADIOI INOPROPERTIiSSHALLNOT 1 TIBSSHALLNOTBEPBRNff=. P. 631.368.3324 •I gICII~'CMpAt1~lON'~7NtlIIt1AL4MwYrildlp>1NaYApGI11'O,gIM7'A6d~MgANAMAW'CAWNCIAL4NONYOMITR4WWAi11iWAY1 AN W"WAY1 A" ALL&WAY1, F. S31.388.1624 10. BUILDING-MOUNTED LIGHTFIKTURES SHALL BE FOR SAFETY OR SIGNAGE PURPOSES ONLYAND MUST DIRECT LIGHT DO MU= LMRT DOWNWARD. Itlr Ql ~ , 14 Rix YFl" ~ WALL-PACKLIGHTS OR OTHE RLIGHTING THAT MINES OUTWARD TOWARDADJOININO PROPERTIES ORTHE STREETRIG TIE STREETIU091'-OF•WAY SHALL BE PROHIBITED. SHIELDING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO AVOID LIGHT TRESPASS AND GLARE. REVISIONS: I QAGATHA AqE OET Tx~i v_i_._._ .:e., f_[_'T tnru ww.._.._~~•.•,,~~ R O m 11. DECORATIVE STREETLIGHTS OF NOT MORE THAN E,2 FEET IN BRIGHT SHALL HE UNIFORMLY APPLIED, INSTALLED AND STALLEDANO ~NF'W4P ,,um MAINTAI EDSTTUATED IN SIDBWALK CUTOUTS EVERY 30 FEET ON xwn«RTrxnRmYY 0.Y9T it P~~~ "f «om¦ Yr 9Y yA9LYY x.YY Yn HA9E pa0f 9NRS0 RiOTIAe p~p nu T"G - ®rx rm Ne usmRY CENTER ALONG THE SITE'S FRONTAGE. THE SAME LIGHTING FIXTURE SHALL BE APPLIED TO EACH MAIN STREET BUSWE N STREET BUSINESS DISTRICT. Date Description No. ISyn149 xFRNfU Jt Y`Yl 10!18 fi1IWp-,.. _ ' 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS DATED 03/13/08 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 _ _.mmnmoYU {W. igJYw wni S~J *w 1. ~s!!gf_~ •iADlf9..,~..--..-~ IAW PiAYWI OELUL N/F RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE / MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD '..1 ~ 1 IxM'- l u TC 15.73 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS . ' . Y Y¦RYTM ac 15.32 ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS B EXISTING RETAI IN E" CONCRETE FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF ~ { f Yn.`s 113YIYIYIYL '.r-•~~( / RETAINING USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. WALL ALONG NORTHERLY A 5 P H A L T P A R K I N G 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD uL1J PROPERTY LINE / u COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 FLSRT pLAAmw AIJ 9L008 -11. ~ 11- xrtxr .lox m®mY OY xm, Yx. x«r xmm tmom m A7JVIimG w "-I~• wua / N 48'57'30" E 146.00 jjQQe / EXIST. ~mS• - 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD GRATE COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 HO EXISTING NATURAL VECET ION 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE / COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 EY- BOTANICALNAMB COMMON NAME SPle QUANTITY / 41 SEWEN ELEC. .L TEN METER - -l~ ] PICURUBHNB RED SPRUCE 4' mim ceL. ]2 / '~61F49 Y-0' MIN, LIMSCME SUFFER AS O2 CUPRHSSOCYPARI9 LBYLORD CYPRH99 30- &L 33 j L J L J PER TOWN CODE SECTION 250-95. LIST OF DRAWINGS: 8WH8TH8AL LHUCOTH08 4'-6H 10 g ® CD m PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SF . . {i ®I (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA- 2275 S.F.) / / 0 0 Q3 LHUCOTH0HRA.C®A08A ® PROP. STACKED RUNNING WALL SEE Sheet Description O THwAOCCB)BNTAUSNIORA AMMUCAN ARBORYITAB 7H 23 J ® ® q 00. ON SP-3 5 RINIPHRT79 CHOIDTI8I8 p OOLD COAST UNIPBR l9'103 SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN Ln -PARKING CALCULATIONS i ( ALL HTO8T1N0 LAPID8CAP8TO HBMYIIN -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS T EUONYMUSALATUS t WINOMHUONYMUS 3V El 9 / , . ® ® n1, N POLE E, CGMPKT -SANITARY CALCULATIONS •R / / / / / / IT7 CARS ONLY IOTY. J) ac zz.m 10 22.51 ®0 685 SF. PR POSED ADDI ION A5PHALT PARKING -ZONING ANALYSIS SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN •LANDSCAPESCHEDULE' Nr~ y NYT014tiY07 0 may, LANDSCAPE NOTES pJ xn ® ® A 7-31 GD.wom WK wS.&51 SP-3 -SITE DETAIL ® • O t POST EVENT 51-3' O.C. 0 m O PER TOWN COOED $EEDWIN 250 SC SP-4 TRUCK ROUTING PLAN EXIST. A° e gy'm` ~-0 SP-6 AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY BUILDING g Q 3, ® m pnpF PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Q . ex Ew o . I I I I I II'F * r. TO 20.02 A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS l l RAN 1 " PfANRC 1 uw 1 A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS i r• iT%Tt 1' pwp. 7-ELEVEN' ID SIG 1 ID BwIN ® TO 20.40 W'ed' L3~ *u ese plans are an s men o S k AND 5 so - "o a® •m •m GRASS/ TOR SOIL 1a.; T ° 1,~, EXIST E' B~I'9 5 .00 ms, re NNRR 1=0 service and aro the property of the Engineer. Infringements will be AND 5 AND SEEDING 8~57 30 EWST.S" BUSH fF Xa 26 aY011i2606 IST's. Bus prosecuted. , I O O EXISTA' BUSH EXIST. 10' BUSH TC 21,01 TO 25.71 TC 25,10 d 01E 2G 0]041529 Contractors shall vedfy all field lE~ TC 26,58 B mmm. NMNNA BC 25.23 YB 07N 1521.51 I EXIST. UP3~ NYT3H EAST. S N cu 191, RLE CDV TO 20.1112 conditions and dimensions and shell be responsible for field fit and ~ BSNCnoR FBm FUME iMWWo w WEBB 1@OWSNBi19 2 w SC 2f,50 24AT ENTRY 0 quality of work No allowances •1F+m :1" shall be made on behalf of the a N111$ LINE BC 23.d5 BC 2436 .91 20.04 A ®BC 20.4,! Contractorfor anyerror or neglect UBL YELLOW LINE J ^ ^ NHITE LINE on his part. SEAL 6 CI n WHITE LINE MAIN (WIOTN VARIES) R{ (S+ R 25) c N m Project WAITS LINE C i U R DEL 0 UN N I N 0 LAN E BOP WE 10 BE 6EF n NIBMER MOT N'LDNCDAIE i0B DEL YELLOW LINE L GIN E OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, INC. PEIBESIRW CROSSWALK (NYSDOT R,O,W.) 320 FROST POND ROAD (ROUTE 25) WHIT LINE (VARIAELE WIDTH) OLD BROOKVILMNY u - TC 25.31 TC 26.09 TC 25.95 BC S 59 C 25.56 BC 25.54 URB C 3 I~CUp B. B ~UP URE TC 25,32 TO 24.53 C 6Bl BC 24,06 IjN`''i ItO PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, 71 h h a h MAIN RD. & FACTORY 5TOP LINE AVENUE i 6 NOTE. MATTITUCK, NY;- f ~ THERE ARE NO CURB CUTS (RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENG ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE ` ADJACENT PROPERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLE AND MARLENE LANE V SUFFOLK COUN TAX MAP DIST. SEC. "BLR "LOT " v 1000 142 01 27 s r o- 0 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. LAN 1 LAMW PE P20 P- = '-0 SC " Au sIn ALL DA MGORMA a BASED UPON Scale: AS NOTED _ " A suRNEr w A BVaNE1' 0A1E0 02/16/0 8/00. JOB NO. 08010, BT, ~VOL ~VOLLMUTH k BRUSN SPvrrx)'H a. S W WuF PowE ~tAwE 4C IdMxY. ~ Drawn b y: M.C. i i pW~l Sr'•~'r`~Y~nf" Planting in accordance with I l ei.w..mmw~ Sect. VII, Landscaping, Table KEMPEY ENGINEERING PROVIDESTEO,CAP wruYa rlal 'At 3. I-1/ x•a .NN high Wt ma. ' nikgh Wbdom. .IMNrIJn. 6- DIA. STEEL BOLLARD encirw. 14" core. lob (rn blook nae n.t. 1) 40001b._ aauna. e /L high Oil J around. 6-0• LONG MLEDSOLE3 2111 day inningin WrrHCONCPZMPPaM INDUSTRIAL TYPICAL CONC. ed P'so 6- s 6' - 10 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY 10 AND PAINT (2) COATS j STREET REPAIR CURB GUTTER ~wIn' ' mnn ns S s' WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 TOP OF TDCPG ASPHALT SLATTED FABRIC DETAIL :W~Oi Ymmy: cover G4te pa (1yp.) 3' fPoU pMl PATCH AS READ (OR coat uN rod. P: 631.321.7777 TOP OFNEW SLAE) .nn Y.nmm .xrl 1_I/y r rop ml ~ .Nx w„ TYPICAL CONCRETE CURB 4~apar PLAN o;; 7 90 " wa.Pa.l GUTTER & STREET REPAIR NOTES: Sllw INM -1/2' • Nm port F: 631.661.0486 Hm• -1/R'e Nrw I• a Banc", 1. - Length and width to be determined by the architect 1 the architect or D' WJ pra MUUa WrI 'iA' Snap eu.r.r . Ia.. malm .i:°°°. v a aa~aP• engineer as neceeeltated by the need. of the side. The Jr m the he ile. The e Is 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE t ,eef Planning board. EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 Grod. sac. s Lvr4 xr.fi o subject to the approval of the Town Engineer & Planning 1 lan•'d~e: x.~Ti'rrf.r ]'Yx NYd Thy, ' 14' DIAL x 3LV DEEP IP' a woo x.. 11 r,EYWbW,dd W.. ib VYc POURED CONC. FOOTING ' e .xrplh 3000 P.S.I. CONCRETE r' ' VmPlli LLrMgW~~I rw W P. 631.368.3324 L Y F. 631.368.1524 P..nW INDUSTRIAL STANDARD STREET REPAIR CURB REVISIONS: TYPICAL STREET CURBS Date Description No. ;GATES STREET REPAIR DETAIL 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS DATED 03/13/08 1 TWCIAL BOLLARD DETAIL 2 BUFFER FENCE AND PLANTING DETA] 1G DETAIL REFUSE ENCLOSURE DETAIL TAM 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 SP-3 SCALE: In =1,-01I SP-$ SCALE: 81' = P-On SP-3 NTS SP-3 L _ r_ rr RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE SCALE: 2r -1 0 INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 4/13/09 WISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF SO OLD PLANNING BD. 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 I M ww. NOTES: !1 xeww.Iw•e.rarewr- I.- Depth of storage to be bored on dish n d, between 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 11 M+YI.IIY.LrP.l.p lowest invert & bottom ofshucture, 2. - AB structures we to be raised to final grade using COMMENTS DATED 7/29109 44 II larwaa,}raw. •r , DI•oblllty Curb Cul ~•Yl'ap"~"'°r°'m' appropriate solid or slotted cover-See Section VI, for BNTP•r c II II w+n..reu epplicatiane. 34a 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD ~ p.t9wFJrR.. SPECIFICATIONS: COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 II C .b A A POLE 6TYL& METEOPOLTTAN ROPOLTTAN PY. tmctrr: 12a0~ PUgIIYN~BUIdsyIJ PARE-NOM. I IM BOLT CIRCLE IN r l B• wla• nn HMIDICAPPPD True -ar-wY BOLT CIRCLER49"BQUARE LIST OF DRAWINGS: 'DIAM. EASE IXWEIL 0 w B'-0~ -el o.a bw ~ mw SHOEBA HOL13 TS: (4) LA . BA E WITS 1) 3/4°X39' WrM3' HOOX, FULLY GALVANIZE. I -!'ASIAL: 4" %S ALUM,p ff SFL 0.. Sheet Description MALUM, POLE SHAFT, BEff ueN.lNaw TUBING ITHA CAST I9ALUAMWTEIUM Fin 9 FABRICATED FROM STEEL PARKING TOEING IT IN PLACE E WITH WITH (33) ALII) STAINLESS STEM I kSTALUM1N MFITTF.RHEI.D SP-1 'KEY MAP 'SITE PLAN 9TAiNLE99 SSTEEL SET ' PLAN SCREM. O_ FINISH: TOIC POLYESTER POWDRRCC I a I MAGNBLACK ,STA POxTMSETw -PARKING CALCULATIONS ^ DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS NNIDIWPED SIGN O . LUMINABE: METROPOLTfAN.2 _p 1 ~erII N DDPOWAN.2 -SANITARY CALCULATIONS wh lckyrounlee MAJOR TREE PLANTING BED I wm• bkr •txp. Gluw I°txnelionel Avow 3'MWfimmfered)utlmnt Rome de (haM-PbeWrt I -ZONING ANALYSIS •ymbal for GrMVtl 91oN acuwlbiNly S' wda6uwad bZcbuoy YOh bmvy Ne, 6a4-DerrPpmr .Iddt O am H-20 load with m oNSt apmay. SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN te'-0 Nanmaapp•e 9bll TPAFFIG FIA npne •LANDSCAPESCHEDULE I..1naY[YNNMYPIr lY~a]•V,.M1Y 4' wN• •INP• (m u..~ Yw.rxr-u...r, rr.W.eb. u+M b 7) ueu.w++r-o.urwrr. Wee...rr°w Reardnin-d-pipeedfil-®- o nl - mnmCllaabetween beeWr-12" Pipe adNmlp- -LANDSCAPE NOTES P.V.C,arC.aupwdMeW 12' WpWmum 4000lb -2adrwmmpbmwism, V Hobla dfl.- r SP-3 'SITE DETAIL OO wuwN a ~144 NOTE- p wW .Trip. O xr.uwrrreee Boam gwbhaLmeomdummdd 1" 1'-0°fill®uadeWnfxeddida ft SP-4 TRUCK ROUTING PLAN 1. - For W. w Nalllc, 4B' 3'-D' o,a. •I" ' M yellow. - TIUFFlC ROW nab 1) For one way 1.B1, •txppllN to Ir white. SL'awYPM IL :I gnw twmmv SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY AllpbrtleorP.V.C. plgwh EBle. 2'W Ilk PH-1 'SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN lhauedwsly SECTION A-A A-T -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS pt m °how0 ha n) UN Sl lb a'1 UKM llKA1NAUE POOL (s LIGHT POLE DETAIL g STRIPING DETAM 6 M11v~K '1 R BE ( Same as for Major Tm" oxoept w ehom hereon A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS SP-3 SCALE: =1'-O" SP-3 SCALE:" =1,•O" SP-3 NTS SP-3 SCALE: =1'-0" These plans are an Instrument of service and are the property of the Engineer. Infringements will be ~,w l prosecuted. ` Contractors shall verify all field conditions and dimensions and shall be responsible for field fit and zo lz quality of work. No allowances O O -COMPACT PARKING shall be made on behalf of the Contractor for anyenor or neglect ONLY' SIGN BEYOND on his part. SEAL i Project Counter Slope of Surfaces Adjacent to Curb Ramps T-3)1 GALV. METAL OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, INC. GUARDRAIL SYSTEM W/ _ W6mB.5 POST 0 6'-3- R 320 FROST POND ROAD 1V CASTMONPAAIr10 TOP SOIL OLD BROOKVILL,NY'' AND COYRRTO GRAIM GRADE CASTIRONCOVERS D.C.. COPING STONE JURSEUMJM ADE slmD GRAM z4• zw•d. zw•-u K f8 PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN INC. PROP. CONC. CURB`I)r'_ 1w•a xw•.o TRAPiRC SLAB za• 8-HI 1 8-W " L I. 20• :STACKED RETAINING 21 % TRAFFIC SLAB zo" zo' m s Dom o STOXIE WALL SF~ MAIN RD. & FACT 'RY - PROP. ASPHALT AVENUE G FROM RTTCERN - ..:v MIN.4-DL1M• SDR35 ; a fe `'T ONygE CE(OCRD EVERY 3/4` CRUSH CLEAR = MIN. 4• PTTC® 1l4•:l' L TO SEPTIC I PVC PIPE OR P1A°'•~ "DIAM 8DR95 yy STONE MATTITUCK, NY L _ MIN. 4• DW -LEN S 44 DIAM. PPCCEMD EQUIVALENTPRUM MIN. 4 r 4 2'-O- VERTICALLY O.G h,~ 'j • ~ I r - _ PIMORSQUIVALHNI' EXIST. I _ 1/e":l' I10:1' yiyy f, P1TC®118":1' RETAINING MUNO SITE SOIL WALL ON °x TOP SOIL IB"DINA. x3'-9" DEEP SUFFOLK COUNTY: --MAP POURED CONC. FOOTING b ADJACENT 3000 S.I. CONCRETE 3000 P. DIST. SEC. BLK.--' "'LOT - MONOLITIOC PROPERTY - : DIAMRPRR MAX RP DAL./PP. FILTER FABRIC 1000 142 01 27 D MAX HT GAL.&T. -MONOLITH] 1 8' S' 300 300 t, 8' 3' 10' 6 500 10' 6' 500 13' REINFORCED SOIL IT T 00 ' S'-0- MIN. - - el=~.aaa,.l:lz~aw= i 12'-°• MU. l I STONECRUSH CLEAR Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. Y3 a'-e' MIN. Ix'-o' wx. Scale: AS NOTED y SIDES OF CURB RAMPS to CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK 11 TYPICAL GREASE TRAP _ 12 STACKED WALL & GUARDRAIL DI DRAIL DETAIL SPvmI SP-3 SCALE: z" =1'-0" SP-3 SC LE: zN = p.0" SP-3 SCALE: 411,.0" SP-3 SCALE: =1'-0.. Drawn by: M.C. i 4 KEMPEY ENGINEERING e' O O Q Gv Nhp ~Um k 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY WEST BABYLON, NY 11704, P: 631.321.7777 0 O F: 631.661.0486 Jf 2p } tn~ f j 6 ~ K ~ d' U v ~h ~ U2 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE 03 4 ~W~O 21 EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11;731 N h P. 631.368.3324 j N ~[ci co ~O o 6.17 F. 631.368.1524 V .13 a REVISIONS: h'a °RI m~ tyro PROP. ELEVATED OR1 ~W1Y ~ Date Description No. hUm ~'o "7-ELEVEN" SIGN TYPICAL TRUCK RUCK DETAIL 10/10/08 I OREVISED AS WN OF SOPUTHOLp O°s 2 SEE DETAIL Q1 It 201-011 E: I 20 _O DATED 03/13/08 I STOP N o } 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 25 yg V 249 SQ.FT. DEDICATION u >7 N/F RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE h FOR FUTURE TURNING / MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC INCORPORATED TOV~N OF SOUTHOLD 0) m 0 U' ` RADIUS IMPROVEMENTS TO 14.73 / ec 1e.sz STOP N `~N 26.15 9 _ EXISTING B" CONCRETE ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS LB ' 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3124/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF U / RETAINING USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER WALL ALONG NORTHERLY SO OLD PLANNING BD. ~m c - EXISTING CURB CUT TO BE PROPERTY LINE B ASPHALT PARKIN D / uu3 o REMOVED AND PATCHED TO MATCH z 7/23/09, REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD C R O S S W A L K k kN °000 STING SEE NOTE NO. 5 {y8° "m 146.00 COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 BC 25.65 X p"Ip" N 48'57'30" E. A5.95 / EXIST. ~(Y CRATE 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD Y / COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 44 TC 26.10 x x ®e EXISTING NATURAL VEGET ION BEGINING MARKER / 0 ® I 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 25 0704 1528.57 "'J COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 26.95 25.39 3 MER METER _ _ _ -WSW II 4'-0' MIN. ANOSCAPE BUFFER AS (A i ®6 1, L J L. J II PER T CODE SECTION 200-95. PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SF O LIST OF DRAWINGS: 0 o 8 0~ CONVENIENCE STORE AREA- 2275 S.F.) ® • PROP. STACKED _ _ _ _ / RETNNINO WALL SEE Sheet Description ® ® / / J OEf. ON 9P-3 DETAIL OF CORNER RADIUS = ® I / Cn SP-1 -KEY MAP SITE PLAN -PARKING CALCULATIONS uy' ® -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SCALE: 1" =10'-0" ~w WS ONLY (ON. 3) BC 2zal BD 22e1 ® V 685 SF. PR P A DI ION j% / ASPHALT PARKING SANITARY CALCULATIONS 0 ZONING ANALYSIS h SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN ~v .f~ IV Ya v 3e -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE s P ym~ C Q F' I P ~ • NYT~14 @ W ® cz) ~ -LANDSCAPE NOTES O q IS, ® @ T-31 GUARORNL WITH 00.5 SP-3 SITE DETAIL POST EVERY W-3" O.C. Q . " P. EXIST.' 'M ® Q ~ PER TOWN CODES SE TIONU2R80 Y3. HmU SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN BUILDING ~y ~C) 4) U4 SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY 6 V 3 ~e o PH-1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ~y, * TO 20.02 A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS TO 20.40 I SIG b-ELEVEN A-2 "EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS C SICN i4 II.® These plane are an instrument of service and are the property of the n,r_I I- ® ® e4 •(D Engineer. Infringements will be n,V j'G ;4 f\~r RN~W u~ GRASS/TOP SOIL '57'30' ~YST.S' BUSH(rnf`EgST.S' IJ8.00 R~iRu 07H II AND EEEDINO i wt~ prosecuted. Hill I Ala. o ' BUS n~mrasoo a• E%IST.S' BUSH 6 19T.w (Z?~f E%IST. 10' BUSH M 21.01 Contractors shall verity all geld i~..T MILE MARKER UP°44 d015 ~ 2507441529 SigN ENI9 . NYTSH E%IST. SAN IDLE C0° TO 20.92 f conditions and dimensions and TO 26.71 TC 26.18 TC 26. 6 S`R`RV uARNI shall he responsible for geld fit and I BC 26.23 21 wD1162,5, quality of work. No allowances Fb _ UE6IGTMW FORRWNO WIN N 1 ILK u BC x4.s° a ENTRY 0 shall be made on behalf 01 the Contractor for enyendr or neglect y?IY2 INPR6vEYFN1! z I LNE BC x3,SS BC 2'pY ®BC 20.14 on his pad. SEAL. J L~ !ll~~~ WHITE LINE BBL YELLOW LINE Project c wHI7E LINE MAIN (WIDTH VARIES) R (S.R. 25) MHITE LINE OBL LLO UN TU R NINC LANE OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK; m MON A E la OOfl DSL YELLOW LINE LYE OW INC. =0NOMTE MR PEDESTR4N MOSIN" jsw" (NYSDOT R.O.W,) I WIN UNE (ROUTE 25) 320 FROST PO~ D.ROAD TC 26.31 TC 26.69 C 2 .B5 (VARABLE WIDTH) OLD 13ROOKV6LLE,NY-- . BC 25 89 BC 25.68 EC 2551 G, 8.51 CURR BC 32 Mir NP TO 24.55 BC 24.05 L LL LL : . PB.18 a UP P O f f f PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC."' )J,_ lit- A, " 9T6P LINE I Q MAIN RD. & FACT6RX'17 i ~ G( NOTE: AVENUE THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE MATTITUCK, Y ll THERE ARE NO CURB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE IEE RD. AND MARLENE LANE V ADJACENT PROPERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST. SEC. BLK.." LOT x 1000 142 01 27 i F J A ~v Date: 02.25.09 drawing'no. 1 TRUCK R~U=2 TE PLAN AN P-4 SCALE: 10'- 0" ALL ALL IA NFO MAT0N la UASM UPON Scale: AS NOTED DAF N 02/16, JO6 B NO. N0. UPON 6Y: A BNRVES A aN ALL ENEMfFMF4M1 lulmixc 2W SPoinvis4ILUE RM.~WIK !WE IoMN.Y. Illl! ~V 14YULLMUTH d' 8B1(SH Z'p'w Drawn by: M.C. i KEMPEY ENGINEERING 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 P: 631.321.7777 F: 631.661.0486 r ~J 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 P. 631.368.3324 hit, yr .d F I I,tl a~ r yy~ I r I I F. 631.368.1524 In . '6 Tr, fl I~I -02 ~"GYfN " Oil a I fl~ N0 h u "Y w REVISIONS: a ~~us In'1 q' .I I !I J 11d`''" 4'~' ' I I " !I ~ "t f t r I r a 4'? 'N der n u II 1 r l kl. i,~f u$ ~IF IIIy, tl P J t 'IF w • ~I r 14 rt. y, c t 'fP dI r nJ? r +I I,. ! 1 rx r r It F IF rv Date Description No. 1, j, I, I 2 F I' Its, I ~!J YI I d l It £ 1", Fi~ 12 r{ IF I I It IF Fl 1 ' 10/10/08 REVISED ASPER INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS Yma _ a DATED 03/13/08 l II - 17 I `d I xh~ ; . r P, , dr' V r .1 ,e Ird, „ A c rlf qN o of I„ 1 'S"4~., ' 4M1n t 'III I 'I' NJi f Irrrlif" _ 1 r` If Ole ~,r r4 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS 3 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE 17 I i It I IF It INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1 I II U i I ;I -,M1 Le I ll I~ I I I 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3124/09 COMMENTS d. SE i I, I I r` ,II I. IyYqa J ',N41 1 II r QIII Ir e FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF ,.ka~,~ I~ '9"xri' n , in 4 _ _ 14 k Ilrl SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. I I It r il,'af~~;Ugl « v r t ''il r • - 7/23/09 REVISED PERPLANNING BOARD r t®r f ' aq ~n I I I,. y., as tlr, r I z I r COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 r~ ~~p to " - - a I I j!o i,~ I I, r t. l;~~l ~li~ ~,1• v v ~r 1 ~I lie. I I owl " ~a~ • 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 9~" 4 ^Ir~``" f ft It ?k r - l a: k i 49 IIiIrII1111R.r1 ~~~~I~n rllY rl,, ! " her i',, e Ir ry„ CII) Q ,;p r. ~I ,r ~ frt,?rx I ap ~ . I I '.::V' ~ r~r q > D it Rl' COMMENTS DATED 7129/09 Z r j, I AA~ lw.; p,3, FT Ilea. III ~ ~i ~~@ ~!I h I r 1", . 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD ,I h 1 zI y' 1 r drr~ „ COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 m I I, lItl Y n 12 'r 'it r Q`Q It 'rl'r J II>} N le jfi lef ~-w VA kj~l _ II ~ i llll~ r 7`u p' II I' I r u LIST OF DRAWINGS: 1 u U r r 1 +pM1 ! ya 441~~p fN ?+?Y' ""t e 4~ls.d-II4Pw! ?'.w F1 l- I ttll~iw 'a i arl8 ~a.`^itn v yP ~y,lll 'T 7 r t ,a JI r!I~ .ti"ti 1 ~O J I' r „ 7" 1 o kl n ! Ida Ara ~vb ybri ` T r'r">~A. n I~ ~aF I~r,~ usa'O„ I 'Ind n_ r fi' In~t r '11I 1 N, I N " Sheet Description 1 1 r 2 I~ r Ip ~i'h.N ~yklil III J .P ~'xltrl lr=w Y fit t9 h " lAl ll)k F, SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN v 1 'v II 1 Il 7 ! It v IF -PARKING CALCULATIONS J A u t,' alfal a y ' ry 'IF p 'r to I -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS n I, d fIi L I t ti I„ a Say 11H 5~ _ ' Y M ~ I~, 4 ' ~ a~ ~°61. ~ ' I ~I~{~4mdrvria~4' •sh I Y'^ ~ il,' ~ i F44~~ II t'Y 9J 4 l y/ ' - qi' e h N 14 a uiSVAl -SANITARY CALCULATIONS Iti, -ZONING ANALYSIS ht ativo', ! fA 9 ~4m J LI , "I I f 4 a ffi ~I -fir, A~ a tl~ 9 Ism J Lif" it Od +I4 tlvlf V u.,,~' II, 1 rN a" e r K LW ? r II t T ~I 1 „ v ,I, lel h,a'r~ ~~a SP-2 LANDSCAPE PLAN I,.nl i i, ma t ~°yu1vA , 11 i ~1 17a1r'~1',I, I~ r+a" s "n Iw!`.~" Y It, I'x t f xl " II " -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE !"r dl'w ? Frl I~~ '1.41 J4 I dl Ph 'n n r hl Idl :I 1 ~A 1r"I J 1 i vt4~ w ' 'LANDSCAPE NOTES 4 ~I ~ ` x a III I I ~~l' ~y r 'Inj: a r q- I I , a ly~l-, yi ' sN ~S 4, IF r I' LF1 11 -r oY a~ V r Y II :ter 1 ~I e•+. SP-3 -SITE DETAIL r ~ W`~q f k 1 l 0 i' rN .5 ° J~ .1« a .I < 1 . N.V o,, IIV -r. l I 4 1 - L" r 1 •h+lur 4~,~ b 41 '4 In, IS I i xi i l~ III 4' ~h le ~ "d+Y7kV `4 I ' '~f t l'7v 1'I ft II' ',a, ~ r Ci'«d1"aJ " t okd L~"" d• rra""~aPll, ",1 w hlJF, 1, "1T r'II SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN 7 Pi4.~ Ip"'P.4p t' I P S~ Ff, M114Nhl I, 1. 21!' V "I t r. I, I, Irrn ~i~l~t xl r,171R1r _ ,I 'rW IdlIsra lF u~ Ik t9 " I' li I d I ~1L. d SP-6 AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY IR l~I ~N` r of r r I 'T~0 i ~a Y~y „ 'I IVY I !i Ir I S P J~4 I ~ vll f r I Vi' Au11 li^' " i! y rl r I I Y r f "1 r nr"dS " 6 'I 1' Ili ItW d~'"1 1v.1 li of • k r t L, h I Ilr Iq"~'.4r 1 ~ r I i PH -1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ~ r. "041 "1 }+'r f" r i le d,r, 11 h" y~+„ If hib:~~n41 W ~ - rr ~ _ ~o- ^0+ r y ""'kt r sr 1 W~ yl; ! Y I 4 1 y~l i i9 ~ f tl I II { W A, . 14e~llll II . IFl .tic' 71' a ,,yib-l Ir' ~4'" I* r. _ r A-1 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS l I IF Irk .LY I fla ~ 1,. '~W,Lril 5~'iV A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS Y' fAY These plans are an instrument of service and are the property of the - Engineer. Infringements will be = prosecuted. ~ar?~ Contractors shell vedty all field ~u conditions and dimensions and shall be responsible forfield fit end ~Y !.f .rives quality of work No allowances shall be made on behalf of the Contractor for anyerror or neglect on his pert. SEAL Project t: as OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, INC. 320 FROST POND' R0;4D= m : y a OLD BROOKVILL,IN PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY SUFFOLK COUNTY=-TAX= MAP DIST. SEC. BILK. LOT 1000 142 01 27 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. I SITE PLAN OVERLAY ON AERIAL PHOTO P-6 SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" Au ALL SW iN a eABED UPON Scale: AS NOTED A SUHN A BUB4EY GATED 02/16/00, JOB NO. 0601 OBOt], BY. V01LMUTH o- BRUSH SP-6 ~w eua roix< uvme Drawn by: .C. Y7; w M I' I i : i KEMPEY ENGINEERING Luminaire Schedule Project: All Projects Symbol Oty Lobel A+rangement Lumen, LLF Description 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY -O 4 Metro -2 SINGLE 6300 0.8 70 watt HPS type 4 distr WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 6 Metro -2 SINGLE 6300 0.8 70 watt HPS type 4 distr with glare shields P: 631.321.7777 3 Pavilion-3 SINGLE 4000 0.8 Wall light -full cutoff 50 watt HPS F: 631.661.0486 3 Ceiling master SINGLE 5600 0.72 Ceiling light -full cutoff 70 watt MH 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 i P. 631.368.3324 F. 631.368.1524 Luminotre Location Summary Numeric Summary Project: All Projects Project: All Projects REVISIONS: SegNo Label Z Label CalcTypa Units Avg Max Min AY 1 Ceiling master 10 Parking Lot Illuminance F. 2.02 10.4 0.0 Date Description No. 2 Ceiling master 10 Stray Light Illuminance Fc 11.05 0.6 010 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 3 Ceiling master 10 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS I DATED 03/13/08 4 Metro -2 10 Ken Greene 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 5 Metro -2 10 MagniFlood Inc 0.0 0.0 ~ 0.0 o. g .D 0.0 o.D 0.0 0.1 0.1 °.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE 7200 New Horizons Blvd North Amityville, MN 11701 INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 6 Metro -2 10 T 631-226-1000 8 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS 0.0 ~ . 0.0 " 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 u '0.0 FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF 7 Metro -2 10 F 631-226-4444 E mall Ken niflood.com / SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. B Metro -2 10 W ww.MagNfloadaad.co .COm UU3 .0 0.0/ 0.0 0. 0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNINGBOARD Ootp:2/8/2010 COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 S Metro -2 10 tT 146.00 10 Metro -2 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 .1 0.1~N 0. 7 r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD d d d q. b a 1.. 1a 1a U L , 9+ 9a 1.r 9a 1. a . d U U U qa qr qr . COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 11 Metro -2 10 0.0 /0. 0.1 U 9+ d d 1 r q. U U d 1a + 9.0 U U U U 9 d U U d d , d 0.1 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 Metro -2 10 ~pM d d 1a U , L U e 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 12108/09 13 Metro -2 10 0.0 ' 'y 0.1 0,1 + 9. d + U SEkER' M E a 1+ 9. U U U 0,2 0.1 0.0 0.0 10.0 D.0 0.0 AV a U U d 9a . . d . J 0' + a N 14 Pavilion-3 / AL BUILDING AR~pp 15 Pavilion-3 15 0.0 0.1 0.1 •4 ii 5+ d U 9" b I / + 9a ya q 0,1 'o.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA= 2275 S.F.) b.0 LIST OF DRAWINGS: i o/ U 1+ U b b X 9 U U I+ 16 Pavilion-3 15 b 0 0. ~ 0.z o.z oe 0.0 0.0 0.0 7a U 9,. 5a 1. d / ~ \ ~D67/A / U d ~ 0.0 Sheet Description 1+ S. d /AY SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN 10 0.0 g.~ 0.1 0.2 9 b d + 1 q A. 0.2 0,1 0.0 0.0 -PARKING CALCULATIONS -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 0.0 0.1 o.1 685 PO A DITTO / o.z be b.o u.o -SANITARY CALCULATIONS 9. U U 1. 19.)/ r6./ -ZONING ANALYSIS . U U U U U U b . L U U U U q, U 41Y 9n~ ~ 9? a d .0 o 0 011 9+ U U 9a U 4. % 9.r L 0.2 Od 0.0 O.D SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN aW + a d U U 1a 1.. U d + n U U U U 9.1 U d a U U b LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE .0 0,1 0~'~ n1 0 'cam d 9+ .r d 1a ,,i yr y. q. + y S. q. . U qx 0,0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 -LANDSCAPE NOTES , . U d d U qr d q. 9. U% n SP-3 -SITE DETAIL /b'O. EXIST, BUILDING 0. ^'.40 ~~1 9, 1, t 9., d d d d d d d d q, d d d d d q~ O.z O.t 0.a O.o \ l3 IF SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN rd b U + d d qr d d d d d d d d R. d d d U d d 9. qr U Lo 0 0.2 q, 9+ 9. U 9. b U b b d d d d q, b d d b d d L d + d U U U ~r q a ~ A 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY 9+ U U 9a U d d U b d d d d d d d d d d d d U 9. U L 9+ qr 9+ 9 ).0 0. 0 a 9+ d U U 1 5 d U d d d d d d d b d U q. U 9. U U U U U 9 9, 0.1 0.1 X0.0 G.0 0.0 PH-1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P x q r qr U d d d . q d d U 1 9a 1+ qi U d a 0. 0.o U d 1, 9. q. d %L 1 9. 1+ U d q, d a L 9a 9+ 9 9I 0.1 0.1 0.D u.uQ O.0 A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS / •i M b+ T, ~i b+ !n Tr 9+ 99e It 4 Tr 1+ T b+i~+ 1a , 9n TiW W 9., 9. A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS b.o o.o o i 9+ 0.2 Od E0.0 0.0 .0 1.0 .0 0.0 zn Te 6s ba T+ Tn 9+ T L . S p" b 9+ 1, r 9+ 9 b !a M , 9. • T 6, T, T, M M e M r M 9, 6r 9+ T, M + TT M + 9n L M a 9+ M -L b These plans are an Instrument or 1 o 1) b.o 'c Lo 0.0 9a. ,y + N0.4 b.1 0.0 0.0 ~0 the service and are the property be Engineer. Infringements YAK W prosecuted. I uu bn T, 1, M 9,5 bar W.F+ r bn T. L 9.1 9+ Tr Tr M T, r Tn J li{ u.,. ' ~ G 1 T, M M M r M e. M M M M M M , r M M L T M • •6 0.1 0.0 0.0 .0 Contractors aheg verify Of field L L M M M M M 9+ %mou u n M M M r M Ta conditions,and dimensions and i t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0,o '0.0 ho NP 4 NYT314 on 1.0 0,0 :hart be responsible ror field fit and quality of work No allowances I y O shall be made on behalf of the Cordracforiror anyenor or neglect b.o b.0 b.o 0.0 i LID 0.0 0.9 0.0 OW 0.0 0.0 0.0 n d: E 0.0 0.3 0.4 .0 J on his part. SEAL COL YELLOW LINE o.a b.o b,o b.o 1 WWIIE ONE A WTp~ VN p WNITE LINE 310 b.a b.o o.o 0.0 o. ~EH7 Ro~ R b,pS)0.1 13.1 0.1 bn on on b,o o,o b.o b,o Project MITE LINE a OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK 0.0 0.0 1).0 'o.o "I ).0 0.0 O.q 0.0 0 O R , O N 00.0 o o.0 0. 0,0 .0 0 o. 0.1 ,o o` 0. NN1 D,0 10 b.0 DOL YELLOW LINE INC. L YE OW E o.a 0.a o.o 3.0 0.0 0,0 b.o 0.0 w uNE 320 FROST POND ROAD-' '0, ox b.o 0.0 b.o o.o b.o b.o b.o o.0 b.o o.o o.o o.o o,o o.o 0.o Vo OLD BROOKVILL~ N1, UP ~UP 'ON 0 b.o b.o '0,0 0.0 0.0 b.0 .o .0 0o b.o o.0 0o lid ? 1 . E 0 PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. ' i ilk STOP LINE d ' MAIN RD. & FACTORY V AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY NOTE 4,v THERIE ARE NO CURB CUTS RUI RB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE ~ ADJACENT PROPERTY BETWEEN ' Y BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE LANE Q v SUFFOLK COUNTY-~TAX--MAP--- J DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT v r r Z~ 1000 142 01 27 ~v Date: 4.13.09 drawing no. ALL A $pR4EY ALL a WFDR6 IS BASED UPON Scale: AS NOTED A $UR4EY OA 1ED OY/1/16/0 /08, JOB B NO. N0. 00013, BYI 1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ~VOUMM11 BRUSy Hanson I ocmmexa-uxo euMnxo wa ewe wxr xviu SCALE: V= 201-0" uuc wunxr. inn YN!~ Drawn by: DLS ~V i l I'I I~ I NI NEW 54"SO.x 76"H D! DECORATIVE CUPOLA i KEMPEY ENGINEERING EXIST. BLDG, W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO NEW FACIA NEW NATURAL NEW 7-11 WOOD NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF NEW FACIA BOARD MATCH ADDITION BOARD SPLIT SHAKES CARVED WALL SIGN LIGHTS WITH SHINGLES ANGLE REFLECTOR AT ALL GABLES SIGN SEE DET.3 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY i EXIST, BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION WEST BABYLON, NY 11704. P: 631.321.7777 F: 631.661.0486 EXIST. BLDG, W/ C u _ EXIST BLDG. W/ NEW » t#WTION IrnARn ML~ ADDITION 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE ~ ~ MATDH AOOITIQ I EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 11 1 it jITT-11 E+ EXIST. BLDG. W/ P. 631.368.3324 j WW NEW HARDIPLANK F. 631.368.1524 . q SIDING IN LIGHT n GRAY TONE i EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW HARDIPLANK SIDING IN NEW 4" PRECAST LIGHT GRAY TONE CONC. LEDGE REVISIONS: Y NEW 4' PRECAST CONC. LEDGE Date Description No. 10/10/08 REVIS2AS INCORPORATED NEW 6' TOWH OLD COMMENTS 2 CONC. CURB DATE03/02/09 REVISCOMMENTS & GRADE 6 NEW 6" CONC. CURB RECOONS FROM THE 3 NEW 10" SQUARE DECORATIVE NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, NEW MAIN ENTRAP 7W MAIN ENTRANCE DOORWAY NEW HARDIPLANK NEW PICTURE WINDOWS W/ WHITE TRIM G .4DE IN CORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COLUMNS WITH 12" SQUARE NANTUCKET STYLE WITH W/ TRANSOM WIN TRANSOM WINDOW ABOVE SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY & SOL DIVIDED LIGHT PANELS TYR 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS STONE BASE, TYP. ® ALL 7 LOC. PRECAST CONCRETE CAP, TONE ALL NEW WINDOW LOC. FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. STRIPE STANDARDS STANDARD COLORS 3M FILM MATEI 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD FILM MATERIAL COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 1 SOUTH ELEVATION A-RED ,C- GREEN 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 3680-53 (CARDINAL RED) '3680-58 (DARK GREEN) COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 EQUIVALENT PMS # 1797 EQUIVALENT PMS # 342 2 AVERY # 10836-7-11 RED AVERY # 10835-711 GREEN MEN LIST OF DRAWINGS: B-ORANGE D- WHITE 3623 (BRIGHT ORANGE) Sheet Description EQUIVALENT PMS # 165 E-BRONZE AVERY # 10837-711 ORANGE PANTONE 19-1116 SP-1 'KEY MAP -SITE PLAN -PARKING CALCULATIONS B A -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS cn -SANITARY CALCULATIONS ,II -ZONING ANALYSIS B PE PLAN °O J SP-2 MA - N N E NOTES LEUEn Fn- PESCHEDULE A _ SP-3 IL SP-4 UTING PLAN E C A D 1 NEW NEW 54"SO,x 76"H SP-6 OTO OVERLAY DEC( 31.011 31.611 31.011 DECORATIVE CUPOLA PH-1 OMETRIC PLAN 101-211 A_1 .n,~,,,...~.,, -11------ y a s-a -avva~aaa raavL 0%Ju1n LL" VA11UNh ~7f A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS EXIST. BLDG. NEW ROOF SHINGLES S TO E%IST. BLDG. W/ NEW MATCH ADDITION ROOF SHINGLES TO SMATCH ADDITION EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW WL Thaw plan~a are an Instrument of T ti, Yin service and are the property of the Engineer. Infringements will be -gti:i ` 111 I F3 r Contractors shall vedly all field r-conditions and dimensions and EXIST. BLDG. W/ shall be responsible for field fit and NEW FACIA BOARD TO MATCH quality of work. No allowances ADDITION FACIA BOARD TO MATCH ADDITION shall be made on behag of the Contractor for anyerror or neglect on his part. SEAL EXIST, BLDG. W/ FFFddd NEW HARDIPLANX SIDING IN LIGHT GAMA DEER PARK, n GRAY TONE ,-EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW INC. i HARDIPLANK SIDING IN Iv LIGHT GRAY TONE 320 FROST POND kOAD__ NEW SERVICE OLD BROOKVILI'E IV Sr' ENTRACE DOOR T i 7-ELEVEN, INC: " i t; MAIN RD. & FACTI _ NEW B' AVENUE CONC. CURB NEW 6" CONC. CURB MATTITUCK, NY L,- 6 GRADE GRADE SUFFOLK COUNTY`TAX J MAP SEC. BLK. LOT i 142 01 27 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. I 2 NORTH ELEVATION A^ 1 SCALE: I/4" - Y-0" AS NOTED I A-1 M.C. I 1 i NEW 54"SO.x 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA KEMPEY ENGINEERING EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF SIGN LIGHT WITH SHINGLES ROOF SHINGLES TO ANGLE REFLECTOR MATCH ADDITION WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 P: 631.321.7777 NEW NATURAL SPLIT SHAKES F: 631.661.0486 AT ALL GABLES 4 EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE MATCH ADDITION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 NEW 7-11 W000 CARVED WALL P. 631.368.3324 SIGN BEYOND F. 631.368.1524 EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW FACIA BOARD TO NEW FACIA BOARD NEW HARDIPLANK MATCH ADDITION SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY TONE REVISIONS: NEW 10" SQUARE EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW HARDIPLANK SIDING IN N DECORATIVE COLUMNS LIGHT GRAY TONE WITH 12" SQUARE Date Description No. STONE BASE, TYP, 9. ALL 7 LOC. NEW 4" PRECAST 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 CONCRETE LEDGE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS DATED 03/13/08 NEW 5" CONC. 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 CURB NEW 6" CONC. CURB RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE BEYOND INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GRADE GRADE 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF NANTUCKET STYLE WITH SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. PRECAST CONCRETE CAP, 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 3 EAST EL_ EVAMN A-2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" LIST OF DRAWINGS: Sheet Description SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS -SANITARY CALCULATIONS -ZONING ANALYSIS NEW 54"SO.x 75"H SP-2 LANDSCAPE PLAN DECORATIVE CUPOLA -LANDSCAPESCHEDULE -LANDSCAPE NOTES SP-3 -SITE DETAIL SP-4 TRUCK ROUTING PLAN EXIST. BLDG, W/ NEW NEW ROOF NEW GOOSENECK ROOF SHINGLES TO SHINGLES SIGN LIGHT WITH SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY MATCH ADDITION ANGLE REFLECTOR PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN wT, I II I II I I II II I I II I II II I II II I I II I II II I I I II NEW NATURAL SPLIT SHAKES A- 1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS AT ALL GABLES F N tl A-2 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS EXIST. BLDG. W/ v m NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO o These plans are an instrument of r,l=' ' q, MATCH ADDITION service and are the property of the :.;f r NEW 7-11 WOOD Engineer. Infringements will be ` prosecuted. it ' ,Y;LL,y',Y CARVED WALL SIGN BEYOND Contractors shall verify all heltl~ .I1~ 'AY ~c conditions and dimensions and shall be responsible for field fit and `aHn', EXIST. BLDG, W/ 4 NEW FACIA BOARD b TO MATCH ADDITION NEW HARDIPLANK NEW FACIA BOARD quality of work. No allowances shell be made on behalf of the N SIDING Contractor for anyerror or neglect C~ EXIST, BLDG. W/ NEW 10" SQUARE on his pad. SEAL N NEW HARDIPLANK DECORATIVE COLUMNSF SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY TONE WITH 12" SQUARE STONE BASE, TYP. GAMA_DEER PARK, ALL 7 LOC. Y INC. Y NEW 4° PRECAST NEW 4° PRECAST CONCRETE LEDGE CONCRETE LEDGE 320 FROST POND ROAD NEW 6" CONC. OLD BROOKVIL"LE,NY'°" NEW 6" CONC. CURB CURB BEYOND 6 GRADE 7-ELEVEN, INC. GRAD NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, MAIN RD. & FACTORY 11' , 6 =III. NANTUCKET STYLE WITH PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY - - J SUFFOLK COUNTY AX MAP..._. r. 4 WEST ELEVATION SEC. BL[< LOT A'2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 142 01 27 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. AS NOTED Aniiiiia2 M i NEW 54"SO.x 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA KEMPEY ENGINEERING 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF SIGN LIGHT WITH SHINGLES EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 ANGLE REFLECTOR MATCH( (ADDITION P: 631.321.7777 F: 631.661.0486 u I u,_ NEW NATURAL L! SPLIT SHAKES u AT ALL GABLES EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE m _LJ. ~ LJ L~ 1-LL1 I ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 P. 631.368.3324 NEW 7-11 WOOD L CARVED WALL SIGN BEYOND F. 631.368.1524 EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW FACIA BOARD TO NEW FACIA BOARD NEW HARDIPLANK MATCH ADDITION SIDING IN LIGHT EXIST. BLDG, W/ NEW REVISIONS: GRAY TONE HARDIPLANK SIDING IN NEW 10" SQUARE LIGHT GRAY TONE N DECORATIVE COLUMNS WITH 12" SQUARE Date Description No. STONE BASE, TYP. Y ALL 7 LOC. NEW 4" PRECAST 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS CONCRETE LEDGE DATED 03/13/08 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE NEW 6" CONC. CURB 17=777= z NEW 6" CONC. CURB BEYOND INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GRADE GRADE ° 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, NANTUCKET STYLE WITH PRECAST CONCRETE CAP, 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS EjffED 7/29/09. 3 EAST ELEVATION A-2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-d" LIST OF DRAWINGS: L' i' AUG 2 7 2009 I - Sheet Descriptio I •KEY MAP - . -SITE PLAJ~ SP-1 PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS -SANITARY CALCULATIONS -ZONING ANALYSIS NEW 54'54.. 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA -LANDSCAPE PLAN SP-2 'LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE LANDSCAPE NOTES -LIGHTING NOTES SP-3 SITE DETAIL EXIST. BLDG, W/ NEW NEW ROOF NEW GOOSENECK ROOF SHINGLES TO SHINGLES SIGN LIGHT WITH MATCH ADDITION ANGLE REFLECTOR A-1 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS A-2 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS NEW NATURAL SPLIT SHAKES AT ALL GABLES N PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN EXIST. BLDG. W/ Y These plans ere an Instrument of 6 NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO service and are the property of the MATCH ADDITION Engineer. Infringements will be - NEW 7-11 WOOD prosecuted. 11 U III CARVED WALL SIGN BEYOND Contractors shall verify all geld" conditions and dimensions and shall be responsible for geld fit and _ EXIST, BLDG. W/ quality of work. No allowances " NEW FACIA BOARD a TO MATCH ADDITION NEW HAROIPLANK NEW FACIA BOARD a SIDING shell be made on behalf of the rv Contractor for anyerror or neglect on his part. SEAL EXIST. BLDG, W/ NEW 10" SQUARE H NEW HARDIPLANK DECORATIVE COLUMNS H WITH 12" SQUARE GAMA_DEER PARK, SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY TONE STONE BASE, TYP. INC. ALL 7 LOC. Y t NEW 4" PRECAST NEW 4" PRECAST CONCRETE LEDGE 320 FROST POND ROAD CONCRETE LEDGE OLD BROOKVILLE,NY NEW 6" CONC. NEW 6" CONC. CURB 7-ELEVEN, INC. CURB BEYOND GRADE GRAD MAIN RD. & FACTORY NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, AVENUE NANTUCKET STYLE WITH PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. MATTITUCK, NY SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP SEC. BLK. LOT 4 WEST ELEVATION 142 01 27 A-2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. AS NOTED A 2 M.C. Q:AMoir\Autocad\Abi Zeid George - Saul.hold Car Wash\7-11 PLAN. 9D.02-24-09\7-251-09\7-41-1)9-4,lWg, 8~~1~2009 4:14;59 PM, XFS Sypergix 8823 (1 Ral ).pa3 u~ KEMPEY ENGINEERING Luminaire Schedule Project: All Projects Symbol Gty Label Arrangement Lumens LLF Description 6 Pavilon SINGLE $800 0.720 Wall Light CC25W-100 MH 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 S 11 Country Club SINGLE 14000 0.720 175 wall Metal haliode down lite with flat Ion P: 631.321.7777 Luminaire Location Summary F: 631.661.0486 Numeric Summary Project: All Projects Hei hting Project: Al Projects g 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE SegNo Label 2 Label CalcType Unite Avg Max Min Avg/Min EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 P. 631.368.3324 asleFlS Illuminance Fa 1S9 8.7 0.2 5.40 1 Country Club 20 2 Country Club 20 I F. 631.368.1524 3 Country Club 20 oRrvEll~ 11~P REVISIONS: 4 Country Club 20 5 Country Club 20 i W N/F Date Description No. b a` e MATTITOCK PLAZA LLC a 4 4/13/09 GENERATED AS PER 3/24/09 6 Country Club 20 . a COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. 0 w ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) O O O OLD PLANNING BD. 7 Country Club 20 USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD rc COMMENTS DATED 7/22109 8 Country Club 20 e ASPHALT PARKING 9 Country Club 20 N 48°5730 E 146.00 10 Country Club 20 i LIST OF DRAWINGS: 0.7 °0.9 1.2 .1.7 °0,9 0.9 °1.3 °1.7 °7.2 0.9 °0,6 °0.4 °0.5 °D 6 i 11 Country Club 20 0.5 0.5 1.6 °2.2 °4.0 °2.5 1 8 °1.6 2.5 4.0 2.2 °1.0 °0.8 °0.8 °0,8 °0 8 109 Sheet Description vW - - - r -1 rn 12 Pavilon 12 3T 0. 0. 6 °3.7 3.0 2.' p`r5J 3J °1 °7.0 °1 0 SP-1 •KEYMAP 13 Pavilon 12 / O -SITE PLAN o~ PROP. 7-ELEVEN BLDG. ° / .2 2.0 °15 2.1 °5.1 '.O 46 4 / /1 - -PARKING CALCULATIONS 14 Pavilon 12 4JJ m LO -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS /n -SANITARY CALCULATIONS 0 2.2 °1.2 / \ \ Z2 / °2.3 °4.7 °31 y. 15 Pavilon 12 0 -ZONING ANALYSIS fi °1.6 6 0.5 1 0 °4 2 m 18 Pavilon 12 685 SF. /PR POSED ADDITION SP-2 LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPESCHEDULE 17 Pavilon 12 3.0 w 3.0 4.9 °i ,6 16 lY j/9:6(/ .5 °2J °7 .9 -LANDSCAPE NOTES -LIGHTING NOTES C 'r 3T c c 8 3.7 .8 °3,7 "9 91.1 ° .0 72, .5 °2.5°1,6 °i.6 42,5 42.5 92. '0.6 ' .2 °2.0 °I.5 p SP-3 -SITE DETAIL Q ~O 61 3. 5.1 °0,9 °1. .7 3 I °0.9 0.9 °1.7 °1 7 °1. 0.9 °0.8 °2.3 °4.7 ° I ~n 5.1 A-1 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS 4~w or r O u o A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS .7, 3 3 2 3 °0.8 °0.5 °1.0 °7.3 °0.8 °0.8 `0.8 °1.0 °0.8 °0.8 °0.8 °0.8 L,4 W =W ° .3 0.4 0,6 "1 0.8 0,6 Ob °0.7 0,9 0.7 0,9 °0.7 °0.6 °1. PH-1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 0 2.6 / / 4jav a 4.~ .4 .4 0.6 °1 .G 2.5 ~1.2j L0 °1.8 2.5 .9 41.5 9 °2.0 2.2`2.6 °1.6 ~`2s °1s 4 °t.t °2. 6 a,, 20 °1.4 73.5 ~s 'Ss S,: 6 'z.s TOP These plane are an Instrument of `42 2.1 °42 2,1 0.3 0.9 °1.9 3.1 °1. °2.2 15 ,D 92,6 ,6 °3. °5,5 °2,4 service and are the properly of the TOP Engineer. Infringements will be - prosecuted. - 2.6 1.6 4 7'30" 19 0 2.3 °zs °i s Contractors shall verify all geld conditions and dimensions end I d015 shall be responsible Mr geld gland quality of mdc No elbwan. shall be made on behalf of the Contractor for anyarror or neglect on his parr. SEAL, p~ CBL YELLOW 4NE WHITE LINE MAIN (WIDTH VARIES) ROAD / \ S R 25) Project WHITE LINE ~T U 1 ` pN ~f TUR KING LANE CBL E" OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, C STOP LINE TO BE SET ORL YELLOW LINE L YE OW E MAIN ROAD INC. m ILC NDO.TE NB PEBESTRANI W. 0y (NYSDOT R.O,W,) (ROUTE 25)-~~ 320 FROST POND ROAD WMIIE UN TC 26 31 TC 25 09 Td 25.95 WHITE UNE (VARIABLE WIDTH) WHITE :oNC cuRe Tc xsaz Tc z4.s3 OLD BROOKVILLE,NY Be 25. 9 BC 2155 BC 25.54 CONC CURB C 2619 BC 24.97 BC 24.06 UP 2016 %UP O Iy Ip Ip CONC CI1RD iee: E 1 I I L L~ ~ PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. MAIN RD. & FACTORY STOP LINE ~O a~\ r V AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY lam/ W SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT VJ J 2 1000 142 01 27 2 C~~V V h J Date: 4.13.09 drawing no. (92TE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ,AN ~ v SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"' ALL SITE INFORMATION I 1aA 26 IS BASES Scale: AS NOTED 1 A SNRVEY 6A1E0 02/16/08, rEY DAM 02/16/06. JOB NO NO 0601 0601], BT. 1 VOLLA/U/H d' ~ oc~m.m-woo: YOZLM4111H a SM& vurmnc-wlo vmmw ma Ewe raw, EWE MYyrt.~NY. b luwW ma Ewe raw.awuE EWE MIMLNY. 1111E ~W M°PMI R urn Drawn by: DLS ~a wn.~+NNw..m I I i I ~h I I KEMPEY ENGINEERING PARKING CALCULATIONS SANITARY DESIGN CALCir, L IONS AREA NAME AREA SIZE CODE REQ. REQUIRED PROPOSED REQUIRED DRAINAGE _ CONVENIENCE SrORE GRO55 2772 CU.FT. / 68.37 CF/VF = 40.54 = 40.54 v,F. AREA AREA DESIGN DEStN DESIGN TOTAL TOTAL 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY FLOOR RETAIL AREA, COUNTER 2,275 SQ.FT. 1 SPACE/100 SQ.FT. 23 SPACES 26 SPACES PACE & STORAGE AREA EXISTING DRAINAGE FLOW FLO1 ~ FLOW FLOW E -LOW WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 * INCLUDING (1) HANDICAP PARKING SPACE PAC E: : P: 631.321.7777 (3) O 10' DIA. X 8' DEEP= 3 x 8' _ 3 x 8' = 24 V.F. NAME SIZE SANITARY: GREY: TOTAL: SPACE: SITE DATA PROVIDED DRAINAGE 3 x 8' = 24 v. F. CON ENIENCE 2,670 0.8003 gdpd/sf OAS gPd/,f 0.05 gpd/sf 134 9d J 9 P g, P =134 gdp P 134 gdp F: 631.661.0486 ITEM AMOUNT % (3) @ 10' DIA. X 8' DEFkP = 3 x 8' _ 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE ORIGINAL PLOT SIZE 24,140 SQ.FT. TOTAL DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR STORM WATER 'R ~ -OFF RETENTION (0.55 ACRES) 48 V,F. )N EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 P. 631.368.3324 DEDICATED AREA (INCL. SOME 249 SQ.FT. AREA RUN-OFF COEFF. FT. OF ,TRAIN CU.FT.RETENTION REQ'D REQ'D F. 631.368.1524 LANDSCAPE AREA) PAVEMENT 12,809 SQ.FT. 0,9 0.17 1960 CU.FT. I FT. REVISIONS: FINAL PLOT SIZE 23,891 SQ,FT. 100 Gn"~Wnr o k` m LANDSCAPE 8,412 SQ.FT. 0.25 01 358 CU.FT. FT. Date Description No. BUILDING AREA 2,670 SQ.FT. 11.18 _N BUILDING 2,670 SQ.FT. 1.0 0.17 454 CU.FT. FT. 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK/CURB AREA 12,809 501T. 53.61 2772 CU.FT. FT. RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE TOTAL LANDSCAPING/ BUFFER 8,412 SQ.FT. 35.21 INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AREA N/F S AREA OF NATURAL VEGETATION THAT IS VEGETATION THAI Is MAT71TUCK PLAZA LLC TOTAL 23,891 SQ,FT. 2772 CU.FT. 71 i WTARY WGGN SHALL 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FT. FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF UNDEVELOPED AREA 0 SO, FT, 0 / BAFFECTED BY E ~NDSCAPED FOLLOWING NEW TANK E, INSTALLATION. LLOWNG NEW TANK TC 18.73 73 % 17.95 1IL32 SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. EXISTING 6" CONCRETE 3" CONCRETE BC 1432 ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) %nas X17.41 K SITE LOCATI~ / RETAINING USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER te.92 NG NORTHERLY - 1 )CATION 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 ZONING INFORMATION WALL ALONG NORTHERLY LINE a A S P H A L T P A R K I N G ML13 PROPERTY LINE p / 21.00 b ~1 T Y1 L T , 1 "i M Y .rf 1 N` ^P yA VI 1 v 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD li COMMENTS DATED 7/29109 SCTM#'S: STREET ADDRESS: 9945 MAIN ROAD, MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NY N ,48.57'30" E R i0" E SO;e.u 3~. 46.00 X,5.B0 It ZONING DISTRICT: B-GENERAL BUSINESS ORATE RCPOSED 5' HIGH SEE LANDSCAPE FRONT YARD REQUIRED: 4,193 SQ.FT. CS Rws 5 rl5 CHAIN LINK FENCE aCPO5E0 e' HIGH SEWRItt SHNED AREA INDICATES PROP. 20 X 1G' TRASH PROP,5 CU. TO. TRASH RAIN UNK FENCE GRADE TO BE FILLED IN. ENCLOSURE ON CQNC P CONTAINER P. 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 LANDSCAPE FRONT YARD PROPOSED: 5,420 SQ.FT. $WW P. 1500 CONPI FILL LIATERI L EL 24.39 P. 2].10 E 2~.1 (TY) ) - 111 Y\ TO 961 W. DENSITY. I ' I 1~Y / w-x) GALLON GREASE TRAP PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE REQUIRED TO BE IN FRONT YARD: 50% (425xrWL x. PRDP. _ON GREASE TRAP PROP. BOLLARD PROPOSEO e' HIGH SECURITY DI 5' 0) CHAIN LINK FENCE (TY _ TTTT~y-3, GUAAR99awL WTIH Wae.S y, i 1 ~1y If k 90 ME0 O O (5' DI 5' 0) PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE PROPOSED TO BE IN FRONTYARD; 64.64% R,,,EA.RF" P NEW ' 11/12/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 40'-0" SEWER ELEO, SEWER ELEO. ER BW~ ~~.92 V-3. O.C. 1' Y~ I (1l V I A~1, 1 METER MET = A I 4~ pTR~ / COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 FRONT YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 77'-1° METER METER . / M1ML ill HE,W BC TC [4.90 ~I yr vi " L Jlr I 'I L J 2 .40 SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 15'-0" A' e0 22.1 E " IN~~ OPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SF _ T 24.90 1 Ip SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 49'-2" ~ PROPOSED TOTAL E pN ML6,m , MH E w - )NVEMENCE STORE AREA= 2275 S.F.) BC 24.40 o :1 LIST OF DRAWINGS: REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 25'-0" 9 IF NEW , 1 O 1 w (CONVENIENCE STO G wo • 23:'10 V DF 61W ; P,°Mllmµ" , REAR YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 21'-8" -W, _ REUANING WILL SEE IryFT c I A~ ~i 11 " y-]W -W GET. ON SP-3 %19.25 ROR 1200 / IKC X17,]5 1 + I, "nay, V~ \t',: ,r IIfI] !00 SHADED MEA INMOATES I 9 I II, V 14 'yp`M~ y J; ,MF l1. Sheet Description 'L~' nw/~ Aruew eD"iwN o I 0 TAANKSEPTIC / -TIC WA J~ / GRADE TO BE TILLED IN. t ! ti'~ 1 - I I y I P ~~t _ I IT / COMPACT nil_ MATERIAL CURRENT USE: GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE N = ''P) 0 Y PROP. E% . / A TO 951 MM. DENSITY. I' 1" II 11 r1 SP-1 KEY MAP / _ RI VIA v P[Nr uuw' I.f Py 1+r y t"~J ` SITE PLAN PROPOSED USE: 7-ELEVEN CONVENIENCE STORE (V PE 4 ~ro~W .6 ' F' /pR6 fT ~iB CARS ONLY (OW T3) -PARKING CALCULATIONS eD 22.5 "FE'y ao R I 685 SF. 685 SF. P POSED ADDITIO /fN), Y A 5 P H A L i P A R K I N G -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS (22°q5) TC 25.00 2~' MAP SANITARY CALCULATIONS n TC 23. w5°xc WA ~E'°n' 1 W. r EG BC 24.50 SP-1 ZONING ANALYSIS " TC OL TO A Ell 1.-,4 C 24. RO . "ATM' EXISTING 8" CONCRETE RETAINING WALL ALONG 4. 4 C 24. 4 WIN OW SIG I EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE TO BE MODIFIED AS TC 24.74 REQUESTED TO CONSTRUCT CROSS ACCESS IF SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN LEGEND 24.4 ° 24. 24 36 3` r, n',rpv qqrn, 24.4 C 24. B 4. 4 R REQUIRED. STRIPE STANDARDS -STANDARD CbLORS 3M FILM MATERIAL ATERIAL -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE TC = TOP OF CURB „ . C4'~1y5.00 NW GG „Mr b° 5N" UMP Is NO EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE PROTECTED S UMP IS NOI DURING CONSTRUCTION. A-RED C- GREEN LANDSCAPE NOTES a IG" . 24.7\ TO BE: AFRO B REMO o~ T-31 GUARDRUL WITH W&M.5 / TC 24.00 POST EVERY W-3- G.C. X le.eo 3080.53 (CARDINAL RED) 3880-58 (DARK GREEN) BT =BOTTOM OF CURB c : np, (3 ~Tj 1\ EIC 24.25 BC 23,50 7 'p EQUIVALENT PMS#1797 EQUIVALENT PMS#342 SP-3' -SITE DETAIL P OP. T.O.G. PROP. "7-11" WOOD CARVED / AVERY* 10B30-7-11 RED AVERY#10835-711 GREEN EL =ELEVATION EXIST, 8A X A^ s~pE, TC 24.75 IN OP. T.o.G. BUILDING /y O Tc 25,00 BC 24.25 E .L22.75 IN ET WALL SIGN W/ GOOSENECK PROPOSED 1" DIAM. SCHEDULE K E. 22.75 LIGHTING /,.to a. B-ORANGE D-VNiITE SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN ¦ = MONUMENT zp q ac 24.so 1 L X e' D. L.P. COPPER WATER SERVICE 3623 (BRIGHT ORANGE) ' 1 FIB= `PROPOSED LOCARON EQUIVALENT PMS # 165 E-BRONZE SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY = DRAINAGE FLOW 201 cR E J 1101 9 • OF NNRE CROSS AVERY # 10837-711 ORANGE PANTONE 19-1116 NEW G005ENE ACCESS TO AOLACENi . NEW G005ENFCK 51GN LIGHT WITH ANGLE PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN = UTILITY POLE ^h 41Q .I, E cAS P Isu D / Q~' ` 6.1 .1 r ? I TO BE REMOVED L.P. PROP, T,O.G. C 23.25 PROPERTY LIGHT WITH AM BBE R MOVED O Ir- INLET EL. 22.50 gC 22.75 TO 20 .02 REFLECTOR REFLECTOR '"r~.'' t2A 13 GIGNAGE EMpLOnE i yN91 Z I~<{" THI .cam]. SEXIST, GUARDRAIL TO BE REMOVED NEW NEW2 1/4" THICK WOOD A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS huff ~~~l119P. Nl~NU4ENI _ (cp TC 23 25 \?IrorosEO S II TO zo,4o 1 PANEL- WHITE- PANEL- WHITE- WITH CARVED m ]-ELEHN' SON TL•i 25.2'.0 4 24 ( PROP, STACKED RETAINING WALL SEE 7-1 1 51GNAGE 7-11 51GNAGE WITHIN A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS DATUM: USGS- NGVD 1929 SEE BC 24 AO TC 2~ BC 2. II DET, ON SP-3 _ BC 23 90 T 5 1a'~'+T $+'i 25.98 F5 m.F1N".E- M""NEVI BC 23.0 r - BC 23,00 B A p NEW 10" 5QUA NEW 10" SQUARE WOOD w N.9IUe WnnwcuENre 25.4 25.55 r~ _K24 oa zb:~~ a' 21~•,~/$ COLUMNS-WH COLUMNS- WHITE- WITH 12" p C 26.58 $ I ~Sn 5 7 L Z ' W EL 2L.61 X ,,,~TLllESELL ETr'1EL 24.32 198.00 -EL L ,47 5QUARE STON Ll`WV x,d ~A' E 5QUARE STONE BASE, TO 24.64 % 22.50 n D MATCH BUILDUP MATCH BUILDING These plans ere an Instrument of - service and are the property of the OF kiv ao3N426A5 ] °c5~.~. r ~N%E.W,.9d(! 91rt W.lA, ,.L }l 'r. •I 4.20 2111, 1jy ,rya % zt.sl m EL 2 EL 7p1~}T L ~~QtF~~{ E%IST. SIGN TO 21.01 ow a o'n~AIR— c~ X3,3 % d015 L 22.51 Engineer. Infringements will be P G: TO 26.7 TC 22.5) • rsawPFO xrLp '~J rnowzu txnuis MaE MARKER n.T'+ °Ot;~q.:y~•+.'.4 : "!,w?; •L . I wprt arunM' cxx, xLY sxx 25 0)04 1529 prosecuted. f TC 26.56 %25.65 1P BC 2.23 s;<,i':nj" f' .1~'J.Y~,.,'vNa•a]14.r• xnom nwr W CONC SIO~EWA Y STR Ms I C R i K %21 ) I I •tn• ST OV iC 20.52 T X25.39 EXIST. GN 24.96 NEW TURF UTI TY STR ~ SO 24.60 TC 24,0 NO BNTRY _ 'i : ' RAMAD20. Contractors shall verify all field 1 conditions and dimensions and - m WHIZ LINE 8f 23,65 0 23 E5 C 23,38 MF~ NAM 20,84 C 22.x2 OBC 20.43 p P p shall be responsible for field fit and quality of work. No allowances ODD Mo. rsgssm 'w tm TCS 20.57 TO PUBLIC Lau pMCO Men Tx[ _ • • WHIT LINE 4y-._ WATER MAIN A•, c 08L YELLOW LI 26%6 n WHITE LINE M A I (WIOTN YMIES) R Q 2I .x NEW'ELDORADI . NEW'ELDORADO' STONE, shall be made on behalf of the Orr$C•.KA°" a ° VARIES) AOSLULx ro ,E Wa - NANTUCKET ST _R GAD ($,R. 255) U, x aPAALLIFL xAIR PRECAST CON( outs o r vna ELLY1 NANTUCKET 5T'LE WITH Contractor for anyerror or neglect % 26.92 k N 24.04 325 REM04E EXIST, SIDEWALK k REPLACE NTH NEW. NEW SIAMP TO MATCH BU PRECAST CONCRETE CAP, on his part. SEAL TO MATCH BUILDING x 2626 tr or- _L? WHITE UNE X T U R N I N G L A N E 0BL LO LIN TO O MEET WITH MEET DOSTING ADJACENT T RAMP SLUSH R LEVEL. LEVEL, REFER TO CONC. PLANTER AREA PLANTER AREA5 ON EACH Project so2wAl( o2ruw. (SP-5 xrSDOT soDT) SIDE OF SIGNP 51DE Of EIGNAGE (G'-4' x 8" n 08L YELLOW LINE J n~ L YE OW E 21.50 % EACH) .4 20.48 a• EACH) W~ 26.23 2803 WHI (NYSDOT R.O.W,) NEV'ELDORAD , MIX I IN 24.43 (ROUTE 25) NANTUCKET 5T . NEW'ELDORADO' 5TONE, OWNER: GAMA_DEER PARK, INC. NANTUCKET SmE 320 FROST POND ROAD 26.28 X 26.31 TO 26.09 TC 25.95 21,4] SC 25.09 SO 25 SC 25.54 e~ CO.NO C 8'I TC 25.32 TO 24.53 C 25A SO 21.6] SO 24,08 TO 24.53 (VARIABLE WIDTH) - - - - - BC 24,05 OLD BROOKVILLE,NY UP ~UP O O I'IQ\ 6 IH'R PRECAST CON( e PRECAST CONCRETE CAP PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. STOP LINE ~Q• NOTE: rvxx• sox vMw ~i - - - - NEW 2 I/4" THI NEW 2 1/4" THICK WOOD MAIN RD. & FACTORY THERE ARE NO URB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE PANEL- WHITE- 7-II 51GNAGE PANEL- WHITE- WITH CARVED AVENUE 7-11 51GNAGE WITHIN MATTITUCK, NY ll ADJACENT P PERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE LANE Q FOR WORK ON STATE HIGHWAY AND V 7-1 1 WOOD STREET SIGN W/ W/ SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP o TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROADWAY =<v 3 GOOSENECK FIXTURE DI ST. SEC. BLK. LOT IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25" SP-1 5CAM 3/8" I'-0" 1000 142 01 27 e BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. h Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. 1 SITE PLAN i~ 1,1 = SP-1 SCALE:1"=20)-0" ALL SITE INFORMATION IS BASED UPON Scale: AS NOTED Spaaas 1 A SURWY DATED 02/16/05, JOB NO. 05013, BY: ?OLLMUTH d BRUSH h Exox¢In»-I.VO rvmDwo i >~,wc roAx. woof ' ' u,~x~Kwm~'1Owr'~'xn.w~ I Drawn by: M.C. d. ' 11 a!; I 7 1I~ 1' ii I i LANDSCAPING NOTES : 1. COVER ALL PLANTING BEDS WFFHAMINIIAIUM OF 2" THICKNESS OF HARDWOOD MULCH KEMPEY ENG1I VEERING 1n1~[w~~!°IIyW.~.,. ZX1'~+ep ON m+rler ra I- ONT1 ON a1 ear 50 Y 9G~"5 uwall 2. AT PLANTING BEDS IN PARKING AREAS AND AREAS OF REQUIRED TRAFFIC VISIBILITY USE LOW PROPILE PLANTINGS. VTINGS. [!f<Fp LI~ I 1 .r f'_.wsoe sf Sla sh 3. DURING LOCAL GROWING SEASON, OWNER SHALL PURCHASE AND PLANT ANNUAL FLOWERING PLANTS AS REQUIRED IN PLAI RQUIRP.D IN PLANTING BEDS TP F OPSY.L BG SIMIC T1E R IIr'• •r CLOSE GAPS IN PLANTING AREAS AND TO ADD COLOR AND VARIETY TO LANDSCAPING. {.-hKn~ppn 1X1.1- tl •-4 II p.YpgRl~ I0i1w .n R.1 'I 1 a Ir ~ ;1/ j 4. PROVIDE NEW IN-GROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT ALL REAS OF LANDSCAPING AS REQUIRED BY CODE. 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY HIYCw LL...i I Rwlpl itYYYC""w .na t,b EIy R.Rlpt •n.•.. 111 1 ..1!{6yC 411. ~ • ._:I I I^ I YYOpN911 tRwlnWwn N 11! 5. STREET TREES. STREET TREES WITH A MINIMUM CALIPER OF FOUR INCHES SHALL BE PLANTED AND/OR MAINTAINED ADJACE ROAD FRONTAGES IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 30 FEET ON CENTER ITAINED ADJACENT TO ALL WEST BABYLON, NY. 11704 1' 1- o.. -J....... i...~ 1~1 i [ AMENDED 2-10-2004, EFFECTIVE 3-1-20041 P: 631.321.7777 ~ I - ~1 1 1 + mm...rF._ • ...an t LMnuS YIOwm~ <I 6. PARKING AREA SCREENING. ALL PARKING AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH A BEIGE, BERM AND/OR DECORATT FENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS, DOOR DECORATNE WALL OR F: 631.661.0486 I I ...p......ml as. .....,•....._.w.....'111TII' aw 7. DECORATIVE OFF-STREET PARKING LOT LIGHTS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. 0. 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE 1 - ~I~HP 1111 S. OFF-STREET PARKING LOT LIGHTPDCTURES SHALL BE NONADJUSTABLE HORIZONTALLY MOUNTED FIXTURES WITH LESS THA I WMLESS THAN EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 0E3EBAL TAFE PLANTAIO TIES %AHEHR M iT MU f SOLS STATIM 1WE3 01HIN SRCIHS01 NINETY-DEGREE LUMINAIRE CUTOFF. FIXTURES THAT PROTECT LIGHT OR GLARE TOWARD TIM STREET RIGHTOF"WAY OR ADJODUKOPROPERTIESSHALL NOT BE PE 'BALL NOT BE PER[vDTTED. P. 631.368.3324 .1 Ir- 9. PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ALONG PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND fALRWAYS AND ALLEYWAYS. F. 631.368.1524 y~g Lti 10, BUI.DING-MOUNTED LIOHTFDaURES SHALL BE FOR SAFETY OR SIGNAGE PURPOSES ONLY AND MUST DIRECT LIGHT DOWNN '.T LIGHT DOWNWARD. 0 .1m 1-1. 7- ik WALL-PACK LIGHTS OR OTHER LIGHTING THAT SHINES OUTWARD TOWARD ADJOINING PROPERTIES ORTHE STREET RIGHT-01 ;TREET RIGHT.OP.WAY REVISIONS: SHALL BE PROHIBITED. SHIELDING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO AVOID LIGHT TRESPASS AND GLARE. J sw.- a_ a saY.$ T 11. DECORATIVE STREETLIGHTS OF NOT MORE THAN 12 FEET IN HEIGHT SHALL HE UNIFORMLY APPLIED, INSTALLED AND LED AND nawN m~i n4`w wv or nett "1 ~ ~~-I.I 'ut'i~'•••••_ . ane~m w ` ~~ep~i~i en 1 ; MAINTAINEDSITUATED IN SIDEWALK CUTOUTS EVERY 30 FEET ON pCm n opOm, p.'Iw4pn a BARE ROOF SHRUB R AWUHG - Ivpc mt Ar.wnaa+mal spi CENTERALONG THE SITE'S FRONTAGE. THE SAME LIGHTING FIXTURE SHALL BE APPLIED TO EACH MAIN STREET BUSINESS DI SET EUSINESS DISTRICT. Date Description No. wxos llf rwanw,IL wi:nm_._. S•: m~ NRW i,iIWU-........._ _ITf..••1•I.I - 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS lnyj~• e ,i AGf IM 4A[W ~ N/F FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF k 1 1 • - qkP PJRTIpO BfTA0. MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC - SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. _ / TC 16.73 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD EXISTING B" CONCRETE RC te,32 ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS B COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 / RETAINING USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER J I ;i .G-III", WALL ALONG NORTHERLY nlolamvA --~-+y }TI~~ t- - - I rtwrn mns I[:: esa 3 A S P R A L t P A a X ULt3 PROPERTY LINE N D 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 BAST lEAUENENT 94 SBAIPt "11 O ~ ~ 1r- .IaTy .514 Ian IpYI 5 wm, yi.fyvr llmmu Uum mEa n..atwc ~ItY-I'~'-L" M9M / rvrv 30ff ° 146.00 N 48a57f Qp E / UIST. 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD CRAE COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 EXISTING NATURAL VEGET ION LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE 11/12/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD KEY BOTANICALNAME COMMONNAME SIZE QUAN= COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 JO PICEA RUBENS RED SPRUCE 4" mim. cal. 12 J2'/ yD''' ® ME1ER NEIEa V- MIN. ANDSCAPE AS 19 L_ J L_ J PEROTOM CODE SECTIONSUFER D WE O2 CUPRESSOCYPARIS LEYLORD CYPRESS 30" dip. 35 800- S o / S9/ m O PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 21670 SF E SECTIONSUFER 800- AS LIST OF DRAWINGS: O3 LHUCOTHOERACEMOSA SWEE'TBELL LEUCDTHOE *411 is (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA= 2275 S.F.) / ® 'p~ ® TFUJAOCCEDENTALIS NIGRA AMERICAN ARRORVFGE TH 23 II / / O PROP. STACKED RETAINING WA1. SEE SEE Sheet Description ' 2 ® ® - - ~ - - y-~W { _ W DET. ON SP-3 / `v @ Fn / ®p S ,DING A~A c LO SO JUNR'ERUS CFIINENSIS O GOLD COAST JUNWER le"die, 183 SP-1 KEY MAP SITE PLAN 6 ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN -PARKING CALCULATIONS T EUONYMUS ALATUS WINGED EUONYMUS 3'-5'11 9 -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS /ll vT ® / / /1 - - m °M~S ONL`d~QTYA`.T3) hCT -SANITARY CALCULATIONS g ULMUS AMBBICANA VALLEYFORGE' AMERICAN ELM 'VALLEY FORGO' 212" dm col 5 eC 22.51 / J~\l 685 SF. PR POS D DDITION A S P H A L T F A S P H A L T P A R K I N G 'ZONING ANALYSIS c1 / SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE a m -LANDSCAPE NOTES 0 8 u®140 0® IN D I I` - ( - - - - - Tat E R We.e.9 SP-3 -SITE DETAIL RAIL wRN VAIA.6 POST EVERY 0'-Y O, O,C. EXIST, PER EXIST. FUEL TANKSQ Zj ME BUFFER AS N SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN DS 0'0' ODE BUFFER AS E SECTION 250-95, ' BUILDING d ~ ° I I TO BE REMOV ~ PER TO" WN CODE OpE SECTION 2e0-95. I GA$ PUM ISLANDI i PROPOSED 1" DIAM. SCHEDU TE DISH. SCHEDULE N COPPER WATER SERVICE TER SERVICE SP-( AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY 3m ® TO k E R MOVED a PI k e ff( PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Q- ~J'° "''^rf „ pN?I `1`II ~ - - - 1Iy-. I I{If~y,\ 'k 1E' m "4$~ f.. _ .IN®. I .A I Inn Inor c olA n 'C~ \ * f TO 20.02 TO 20.02 A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS / km~c• TO 20.40 A-2 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS 2 PROP, /JD SIGN J-ELEMN * II, 4,. 4.. nose p ens are an Instrument o of (HIV , ` c zs.3e 0 ®ATO ® ® GRASS/ TOP SOIL C 2fi.56 '.~.%A 0 SEEDIN 48 5 .6 BUSH f_o.Y EMISi,6• BNSQ~ O K sl re service and are the property of the p R SO 26 W6, @~® ® ® ® IRY fA ® EKIST.e• eus r rcole.~ Engineer. Infringements will be y~ iAE~c e, I prosecuted. TO 26.] UiS SIGN d01SIX(BT.LETNRKER 'lV•.'.k.'. • ...VV!+CTS,I?(WALI~. n.:N S~ !.tl4:.:, •l •tG ....tea 25 0709 152 EXIST. SIGN TO 21.01 Ia MARKER Contractors shall all geld a TC 20.36 SO 26.23 L~. S., ...:yl: DP] ~Y I A IIII TC 22.5) 10 BUSH W . CONC 1ST. SI '1$•]1X1.'{NYt3x9~+:.3~~~ ' SIOEWAL NEW NflPV rygip h'• CR 065 WALK 25 0709 1529 Y 9~ Conditions and dimensions and I 2t~ ^ { `•9°' AT TO 20.82 shall be responsible for field fd and IJ ..ss~.;," `w iD xiN~ BC 24.60 TO 24.OJ O ENTRY rc WHITE LINE Be 2].65 TO 23.3N6 201E AMFl'] quality of work. No allowances ~RUFessKn~V _ m BC 22.92 ATE ®BC 20, 2DS1 shell be made on behaff of the ~f ®8O 20.45 TO PUBLIC Contractor for anyerror or neglect ~ n ^ ~ MITE UNE ~ W W- WATER MAIN on his part. SEAL N WH LINE Al (WIDTH VApIES) R Q S.R. 25) m N JKS OR YELLOW U J_~ Project u O MITE LINE T U R I OBL LLO UN ~ NNG LE A N DEL YELLIINE L YE OW E OWNER: GAMA_DEER PARK, INC. p~ 320 FROST POND ROAD M TRU TO - MI E (NVS007 ' R,O,W.) OLD BROOKVILLE,NY Be TC 26,37 BC TO 26.09 TC 2p5.95 2569 BC 2555 BC 25.54 CV TO 2532 (ROUTE 25) LEI C 26. ~C 26.15 TO 4,5] 2B. 26,16 ~UP 0 BC 24,06 6 (VARIABLE WIDTH) PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. 3 i STOP LINE Q NOT E; TOTE, 'HE6v 1A++ MAIN RD, & FACTORY 4 AVENUE THERE ARE N( H f . ERE ARE NO URB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE (V] MATTITUCK, NY ~<v ADJACENT P DJACENT P ERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE LANE I UJ~ r Q SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP FOR WORK ON STATE HIGHWAY AND DUST. SEC. BLK. LOT R5-2A V TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROADWAY G( IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25" BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. ? 1000 142 01 27 2 SIGNAGE DETAIL ~V Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. ~V SP-2 SCALE: 1 1/2" =1 '-0" 1 L SC E PLAN P- SCALE: 1" = 20"-0" ALL lE INFOP! ALL lE INFORMATION 15 BASE. UPON Scale: AS NOTED SP111111112, DERIVED FROM: STANDARD HIGHWAY A SVR DATED 02, A BUR DATED 02/15/05, JOB NO. 0501 3, sY; ~YOLLMUTa/1 ,,Y0LLMV7H o& MUSH SIGNS & MARKINGS BOOK, 2004 & ]W EWE ~~IIN MIEWE v LuE NxIMY 1E Ow ° -.AP1=0=.- Drawn by: M.C. MUTCD 2009 I l c "•'xTd's Planting in accordance with KEMPEY ENGINEERING Sect. VII, Landscaping. Table VII - 3. \Bumper I' high 9abcona. S per PROVIDE STEEL CAP °nunal voyl .m1. Z 6Cone. ebb (.aa biceli ran.. all 'mccll .nlvN°NLq - P note 1) 4000Ib. omund . 28 do, etr.ngth 5" Du STEEL BOLLARD exyn.l 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY 6'-0" LONG FILLED SOLID WITH CONCRETE, PRDAB INDUSTRIAL TYPICAL CONC. I ~yvv6 hf'o1 woq.6' - f0 AND PAINT (2) COATS z th s' o ash wiin STREET REPAIR CURB GUTTER IA. covo Gob poet (t WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 YPo) P: 631.321.7777 TOP OF EXTG ASPHALT SLATTED FABRIC DETAIL :,Ilnl elacmo:r e• o,. PATCHASREQT)(OR ckaH !ex mono TOP OF NEW SLAB) Wper..nlcol •Ia31 +-I/z' v reo rou TYPICAL CONCRETE CURB PLAN IPP;v6;:. 1 cum GUTTER CX. STREET REPAIR NOTM F: 631.661.0486 110" vl°M Nm: r . -i/z'e am.e -I/2° • un• pod 1. - Length and width to be determined by the architect or engineer as necessitated by the need, of the site. The size is °t °r 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE al:° ie 3. u°I iu~M mm v°tl Iii ie a paop subject to the approval of the Town Engineer & Planning board. Bumprr / low" YID v, +nn rOnYm vlr• IWNnq - G.. I.i°n `~aM~"avN.~".arorPa 1•4xm.xNC. ryP1 'n9 b°°' EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 6'LnldYrtlnl P. 631.368.3324 14- DIAM. x 3'-0' DEEP m• e . dow Ie., ze POURED CONC. FOOTING •a co o bmg0 Llre..ald~nl rw.e MoY 3000 P,S.I, CONCRETE F. 631.368.1524 LYW P'no! INDUSTRIAL STANDARD REVISIONS: STREET REPAIR CURB x Date Description No. TYPICAL STREET CURBS s. GATES STREET REPAIR DETAIL 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 'AIL 3 4 REFUSE ENCLOSURE DETAIL 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF 1 TYPCIAL BOLLARD DETAIL 2 BUFFER FENCE AND PLANTING DETAIL SR3 NTS SP 3 SCALE: z" = 11.011 SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. SP$ SCALD: I' =1'-0" SP-3 SCALE: 1' _ 1,_011 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 NOTES. 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD Aw~Ineade 1. - Depth of storage to be banal an distance between COMMENTS DATED 12108/09 r~ SMma(aN(wM,JbMr 11 ~bxw,W ll.ln(bir.9 lowest invert & bottom ofshuctire. II n,w.ve•q.A,run•w. 2. - All structures are to be raised to find grade using appropriate solid or slotted cover- See Section VL for 34" 11/12/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD ol.amury cam cm II II wa. axv .rlbl•eylr Bumper aed~ applications. COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 awvwxmaa..~ SPECIFICATIONS: AA POLE STYLE METROPOLITAN II LI ~r„rxln~YY w e,~ E: NOM. EIR"BOLT OVESQUARE 9HOH3I/4" AM. BA ^Q^49"SQUARE LIST OF DRAWINGS: HANDICAPPED e'xmw _ SE COVER WVEL 0 wide .-0 °i 5-D wwuur mN Se "mine e~~B8g9a HEIGHT' 12'-10- ANCHOR BOLTS: @)) 3/4" EA 3q"X 30' WITH 3" HOGS', FULLY GE FULLY Cu1LVANIA TT V H00K c. . .u.wem. i Ls' ASAI.:4"DLI AR POLE SHAFT. BENT ARM Sheet Description XSH"T. BENT xM~aum.iwq ARM A55 IS M, FABRICATED FARM STEEL TUBING WITH A WITH ST ALUAIINUM FTITER HELD E IN PEACH WITH (3) (3) STAINLESS SS STP. STRHL SET o FROM STM JMFnTMHM SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN Tmsirr PARKING CALCULATIONS PARKING SCREWS. PLAN O MFINISH AGwBGIC POLYESTER PoWDERCOATIN IMCOATIN DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS MAGNIBLACK LlIb17NAHtE: METROPOLITAN-2 HANDICAPPED SIGN i s N SANITARY CALCULATIONS white an blue backaraund MAJOR TREE PLANTING BED -ZONING ANALYSIS e• whole blue Allow 3'rAnhomfaradjudnlmt Pmmek Grab-Fbcthad No. 664-D orappmvcd equal imps Blue In wrn b.mal P._e. i' ebd far s•ntlofamWru®c bedvg Wbrncezy \ / ~aeh SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN Standard Stall a-o" e•-o' a iblllty Hdp brad with mo8wt opevivg. J~f=1L••••~/ -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE e•-e -LANDSCAPE NOTES Handicapped Stall TRAFFIC RO w A' wide stripe mwa ea•xs3•aa.xN y,-lomW+wO twPMP'a,x elvrb3nanuaa~l p (see .AnelrwWeapw•Nrregnrr.n ewNa•,n."My Raddmv-6•pipasehl - • 0 enl ate 1) xssmp.uwrvaWprw. cauveotlonbeNvaavbodm= l2" PIP, miNVam- P.V.C. ar COwSOt°d Mdn1 SP-3 -SITE DETAIL 1R" Medmum Molb-2¢dq•whicWhruoode Vmlob,. dlem.br SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN OO nYv H.ctfill will dean lpnmda mdedd 13 1 4" 11-0' .R wuad bada roo fog depth. NOTE: p B" wide etrlpe O r.ILwulmw+®I 1 1, -Far t traflic, 15. 5•-0" q.c. SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY .tripping to hellow. - TRAFFIC FLOW see hot. 1) For one one way traffic, T-0.Suo'Ma an..l°w.dMm etriPPinQ to be • white. Allpbdb or P.V.C. pipeb be $DR36, PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 2'-0' M1La Gmuodw.lm A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS SECTION A-A A 'f T.. A 0 T AXT 117V 0 T UT rc T A TTIIATO ON SITE STORM DRAINAGE POOL g LIGHT POLE DETAIL .C-l (r 'liAUl A1VL YY liUl liLLiYAl1V1YU s STRIPING DETAIL 6 MINOR TREE( Sure as for Major Tres, except as shown hereon) SP-3 NTS SP-3 SCALE: a' = 1r-0" SP-3 SCALE: Z" = 1'-0.1 SP-3 SCALE: 4" = 1,-0„ These plans are an Instrument of service and am the property of the `P Icr oP ~Retp . Engineer. Infringements will be E G ry~\~q prosecuted. * r s2\\,, ,i 1 Contractors shall verify all field conditions and dimensions and r I w shall be responsible for geld fit and 00036"l quality of work. No allowances S 20 Iz 00 0 shall be made on behalf of the OFESstoNh Adjuiwoy.mM1mmedmm.lope I I~nme mudm~.bc. Contractor for anyerrer or neglect \ ' ONLY SIGN BEYUNO on his pert' SEAL O O 'COMPACT PARKING Project T-31 GALV, METAL GUARDRAIL SYSTEM W/ OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, INC. Counter Slope of Surfaces Adjacent to Curb Ramps W6xR5 POST 0 W-3" m 320 FROST POND ROAD NTS CAST IRON FRAME O.C. COPING STONE TOI TOP SOIL OLD BROOKVILLE,NY AND CONES TO ORADE CASTIRONCOVERS p_gMADE FINISHED GRADE E PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. rw•m+c PRi 110". yy,, B'H x 8'W x 18°L r'. PROP. CONC. CURB 24" ne•m MAIN RD. & FACTORY TRAFFIC SLAB 20 zo• g' STACKED RETAINING PROP, ASPHALT AVENUE TRAFFIC CLAD 20" 20' u N e STONE WALL II.THT ...F.I^-3/ MIN. 0 DIANE SDR35 OUTLET w & FROMKITCHEN - iv e1°w CEOCRID EVERY ST( PVC PIPE OR m rim. MIDI. 4" DRAM SDR35 ~a 2'-0" VERTICALLY O.C. r - !TIC TANK EXI . MW 4"PITCHED 114:1' TO SEPTIC TANK MEN. P DIAM. PITCHED '101,411 PTTC@:D EQUIVALENT PITCHED POPE OR EQUIVALENT EXIST, I EXISTING SITE SOIL PITCHED I/6":1' 16 a RETAINING WALL ON ° TOP SOIL PC 16'DIAM.x N-a'DEEP SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP POUR • ADJACENT 3C 3000EPS.I.NCONCRETEG DIST. SEC. BILK. LOT WW PROPERTY FIL LTTHIC DIAAD3TER MAX. HT OALIF ^r I , _ tFILTER STONECeusN aeAR MATIITUCK, NY W FABRIC 1000 142 01 27 -MON01ITHIC D MAX. HT OAL,/FC. REINFORCED SOIL A' S' 300 e' 5' 30D - - REI 10' 6' 500 i _ D' 6' 500 12' 7 700 12' T 700 NLL' - •3 I - - - - - _ W-o• MIN. 'I 31e CRUSH CLEAR Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. PMnd Wn LIOm[dgn •I 12'-0• M „III I ImII IImIIh ST . I I STONE E Scale: AS NOTED SPainia3l E'-0' MIN. z 12'-0' M . ii TYPICAL GREASE TRAP 12 STACKED WALL & GUARDRAIL DETAM L DETAIL Drawn by: M.C. 9 SIDES OF CURB RAMPS 1o CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK SP-3 SCALE: 4' = 1'-0" SP$ SCALE: " = 1'-0' SP-3 SCALE: 2" =1'-~" SP-3 SCALE: 2 I1 j, III I KEMPEY ENG INEERING Cv. ry, 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY U WEST BABYLON, NYI 11704' O h~S h m Q hhUU P: 631.321.7777 0 (1 Qr ~Ok h~ F: 631.661.0486 _44J u ~S N U 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE u u h ~ ~ k ~Uhp ~ EAST NORTHPORT,' NY 117;31 P. 631.368.3324 N ~ UmU Z h0 am" 26.17 F. 631.368.1524 V ~co 26,1 3 REVISIONS: N~ ~ PROP. ELEVATED ~IPEWAY : u e ~Q N N. Date Description No. ~um nZ v '17-ELEVEN" SIGN SEE DETAIL 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE N ~ / C INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STOP ry U 25.98 N 249 SOFT. DEDICATION 3 N/F 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP.'TOWN OF h FOR FUTURE TURNING r3 MATPPICK PLAZA LLC SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. - a.) ~ro N. ` RADIUS IMPROVEMENTS TO 19.73 8 STOP N ~V U 26.15 _ 9 eC 19.32 ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) £y" EXISTING S" CONCRETE 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD X 2b. / W RETAINING USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER WALL ALONG NORTHERLY COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 PROPERTY LINE B A S P H A L T P A R N I N C / uu3 k Xry 26.00 ° 5 ° U 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 BC 25.65X X "s p"mp~ N 48'57'30" E 146.00 25.95 / Ea EXIST. CRATE 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 TC 26.10 X X EXISTING NATURAL VEGET ION / W 11/12/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 26.95 25.39 -W / 0 SEWER ELEC. COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 0 y,® 0 METER METER - ~1 4'-0" MIN. LAAOSCAPE SUPPER AS FOR WORK ON STATE HIGHWAY AND o L J I PER TOWN CODE SECTION 290-95, PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SF ® p LIST OF DRAWINGS: TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROADWAY / i! 2~ r '*O 0 (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA= 2275 S.F,) 0 0 IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 2511 0/ m O 0- ROP, STACKED 0 PRETAINING WALL SEE m 3 O , ® -W OET, ON SP-3 Sheet Description BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. m 0 IKO A DETAIL OF CORNER RADIUS Z~/ y H// 2 ® / / \ / / u VVV N SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN -PARKING CALCULATIONS pp O / POLE W~ "'R ® I / v SIGN MOONED SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" ~w m CARS '0 LYO(OTY.3) DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 9C 23.91 12.81 685 SF. PR POS D A DITIO /L-- ASPHALT PA RKI NO -SANITARY CALCULATIONS m ( -ZONING ANALYSIS SP_21 LANDSCAPE PLAN -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE!', h T NYT14 N®14® ®0 ® ® J IR LANDSCAPE NOTES 0 1 OP w peog ® 19' o Y r T-31 GUARDRAIL WITH We•9.e SP-3 SITE DETAIL POST EVERY 9'-3• D.C. ® e• e' } I EXIST. FU TANKS OO b ? 4'-0' MIN. !LANDSCAPE BUFFER AS EXIST. ® PER TOWN CODE SECTION 390-9e. SP=4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN BUILDING n~ " ® GA$ PUM ISL TO B R MOV `a PROPOSED 1" DIAA1. SCHEDULE K 9 TO BERM D COPPER WATER SERVICE SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO ,OVERLAY o m PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO 20.02 A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS l l . . s , Pa Y EM9 ~ ~ ~ II TG z6.4o A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS PROP. b-6LEVw 1 . dN. 10 SIGN L JF These planears an Instrument of I PS 'a NCtgY . i?X service and are the property of the Ili, 5"~-~t}~LF K o ® ® ® ®0~0G i ®61® ollu °...A. ONOSSEEBIN ~G ~3o TYST.6'BUSH EYJST.6'I~11 O q~ rt Engineer. Infringements will be 1 p * 3 C 28.58 CRASS NO SEMI prosecute BC 25 Y' 4 1 Y,3 ® ,F, ® -W p J® xlST.6" SU s orm,~So1°o 1}~ ii?JS TO 25.7 EMST. SIGN ~,.c'?r'IS 1,•,S i . (i.`..,. ^3~ Y:.w "-•i ,ggi }.~...-V E 15 TC 2 5) EXIS M Contractors shall verify all field I m ~q~~. TO 56 I WO4 MISZ9 TC 21.01 25 = 4NEW,~EdG•_51~ W~ R.V,tL: 3. f. K;.•.°..t :~..~P,fil;•g..+!YTl{I W CONC SIOEWA conditions send dimensions and 1~ I' 1 pA-o; cr~3~0 shall be responsible for field fit and q~ 8C 26.]3 ^ EXIST. 51 NEW TU UTILITY STR + IIIIII R 0 5 S W A L IIIIII I "w RAMf~ OW TC 20.02 quality of Work. No allowances r'1nIV, U M i.. U4h 1ST SC 24.60 C 4, O Y shall be made on behalf of the ~..UI WH BC 23,65 23,36 C 20.64 I E LINE BC 22.82 A ®BC 20.43 TO PUBLIC Cordraclor for anyerror or neglect m on We par .fS EAL OBL YELLOW L E m ~ n ITE LINE 1Y--, WATER MAIN n ~t WH m ao ° WRITE LINE M A I ( IOTH VARIES) NA+! 1 A I1 ~S.. p. ~ o ~ \z/ TYlILII It Projecti i WHIM LIN NVL 0BL 0 uN ~ TURNING LANE OWNER: GAMA_DEER PARK,'", C _ DEL YELLOW LINE INC. L E Ow E 320 FROST FOND ROAD X NHII TC 26.31 X 26A9 iC 23.95 NHITE LINE (NYSDOT R.O,W.) OLD BROOKYILLE,NY BC 25 89 SC 23.55 BC 25.54 GONG CVRB .32 (ROUTE 25) 9 GONG CURB C Y432 87 TC 24.53 (VARIABLE WIDTH) C 28.16 UP ~UP O O BC 24.06 Ip fp Ip PROJECT. 7-ELEVEN,' INC. i I I I L STOP UNE NOTE: MAIN RD. & FACTORY „ly g r ~v ITIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE AVENUE G~ THERE ARE NO CU CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ~<v u ADJACENT PRO TY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE 4ND MARLENE LANE MATTITUCK,'NY Lj~ x Q FOR WORK ON STATE HIGH' FATE HIGHWAY AND SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROE S, SEE "ROADWAY ( V DIST. SEC. IBLK. LOT x IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR' 'CANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25" 1000 142 01 27 BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASI EERING ASSOCIATES, PC. Date:l 02. drawing no' 1 TRUCK ROUTE PLAN SP-4 SCALE: 1" = 201-0" (TRUCK PATHS SHOWN REPRESENT ALL SITE INFORMA ALL SIT INFIXtMAlION IS BASED UPON Scale. AS NOTED A SURVEY GATED 02/11 SURVEY DATED 04/16/06, JOB NO. 06013, BY. _ TM Vo"W11TN & RM& P 4 WB-50 DESIGN VEHICLE) y3VOL4M LMUTJV au.Ea:w W'Rm~ /ru( :m axe rue l9xrN.r, x w.°r: Drawn M.C. I' I 1 1. KEMPEY ENGINEERING 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 P: 631.321.7777 r F: 631.661.0486 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 m.. ro od r Ai r nFf P. 631.368.3324 w ~4w & x -h~~ ,dxl,ll '1F6 'o F. 631.368.1524 REVISIONS: r i.^` yy IN M~ r M - ~ 4 I g . ~iI II tt '~2r ~VU 6S: d J 10,°011 Date Description No. l Ax' ; . Ii P~ q y d VI~ n a - kW r _ I tl `k T.'i!kT aHN I .e , ~rF r8 i'," 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & loin, It RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUIgOLD }",ddxF 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS TP .1, Of, "TA FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF WN'Atl r p ~u . e I Aft SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 V r5 21 mf Pi's y ~j b rcF''~ h` I r 5Y (~~lIIIII II b ' y r I w ~5 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 I'M r ~ 10M i ~I 1 YI { `+a'yo` n 1 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 a, nL a M2~9"LL'Tr h I~~It IT T IIIIII~ 111111 II II ~ N'H" , I _ `~1 ~~MI 1 10 11/12/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD Aa "0 -L COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 N4 1 L; 1 0 4 LIST OF DRAWINGS: i'k ear w v 11~11, Ow F r w' 1 mFl a a , fA = 4h ~ Sheet Description 4 I'I S `YF , A't 4. y, „ ~Ih l - il' r ~ kl ~y ~rn !Wll k A IVANW SP- I KEY MAP -SITE PLAN Y AY r 'Y p y .,r 'd y ji: -PARKING CALCULATIONS r 40 +:0 ? .I 9150 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS NA Y f .1 T, w ru wa . ~ Wqi v ~ r4 ' W pe x I M,n ~R s k tl SANITARY CALCULATIONS ZONING ANALYSIS 1. rv SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPESCHEDULE Q' PTor : ~ 1{44 ~ t-^ S ! ~ -L G ~ r LANDSCAPE NOTES SP-3 -SITE DETAIL IIV. A 1 IW. ~M h M1. ~y SP-4 TRUCK ROUTING PLAN 4 '`4 k} SP-6 AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY r PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN .n 1 ~1 I, ~ aY ~ ~er V. A-I -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS I MI A-2 FEAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS u ur a ,Ar' ~ Y i i I fYr NuI ~ IF P These plans are an Instrument of ,t service and are the property of the Engineer. Infringements will be 'p~ nF ~V prosewted. " 1\ 13 ( P is J[ M r, YS %n- ~r irv 111 - Contractors shall verify all field 'fig ~W I„ uei, conditions and dimensions and `k. r " va shall be responsible for field fit and ~'I °R psi r~ quality of work. No allowances pas~o~°P ,'i`:• shall be made on behalf of the J u~ Y V1, I't Contractor for anYerror or neglect \ JI on his pert. SEAL 1V Illhr r~ Project fl!i'. OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, INC. 320 FROST POND ROAD OLD BROOKVILLE,NY i PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. MAIN RD. & FACTORY I u AVENUE PUP, 15 MATTITUCK, NY SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT 1000 142 01 27 1 SITE PLAN OVERLAY ON AERIAL PHOTO Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. P-6 SCALE: 1" = 401-0" ALL 91E INFIMAnM IS Br A SURVEY DAZED 02/16/00, JOB 1E M D2/16/00, IS D BASED NO. 0601 Scale: AS NOTED )AMD M N AnON AD NO. UPON BY, YOLLNUTN ? 6RUd UMITf/ ? 6RUSN marmwxc-ewo wmn xwe wwr wuw ewe wwr wu~E SP111111111111116 rue pixrM r, i~ .x-(m.wr-mm ru (021+~-m0 "'N' Drawn by: M.C. WM+euna n u i i I KEMPEY ENGINEERING Luminous Schedule i Project: All Projects Symbol Oty Label Arrangement Lumens LLF Description 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY -O 4 Metro -2 SINGLE 6300 0.6 70 watt HPS type 4 dish WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 6 Metro -2 SINGLE 6300 0.8 70 watt HPS type 4 distr with glare shields P: 631.321.7777 u 3 Pavilion-3 SINGLE 4000 0.8 Wall light -full cutoff 50 wall HPS F: 631.661.0486 3 Ceiling master SINGLE 6600 0.72 Ceiling light -full cutoff 70 watt MH 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 I P. 631.368.3324 F. 631.368.1524 Luminaire Location Summary Numeric Summary Project: All Projects Project: All Projects REVISIONS: FqNo Label Z Lobel CalcType Units Avg Max Min Ceiling master 10 Parking Lot Illuminance Fc 2.02 10.4 0.0 Date Description No. Ceiling master 10 Stray Light Illuminance Fc 0.05 0.6 0.0 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE Gelling master 10 INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Metro -2 10 Ken Greene 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS 3 0.0 11 .0 / o.0 0. a .o o.o 0.0 D.o 0.1 o.t '.1 0.0 0.0 0.o FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF 5 Metro -2 ip MagnlFlood Inc 7200 New Horizons Blvd SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. - fi Metro -2 10 North Amityville, NY 11701 T 631-226-1000 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD F 631-226-4444 0.0 0.o D.0 0.1 0.1 0.t o.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 o.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 7 Metro -2 10 E mail Kennycmagniflood.com 8 Matra -2 10 W ww.Magniflood,com LIIJ3 °.o o.o/ .0 0. 0 0.1 0.1 10. 2 oa 0.z 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.z 0.z 10. 1 o.1 o.t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD Dote:2/8/2010 COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 9 Metro -2 10 / 11 146.00 10 Metro -2 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .1 D.1~N b. 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD M M M b, 9.r 9. 9.r 9, 9. 1 9. 9 9., 9. 9" 9. 9.. a M b.. R, b. q.i ba 9e a COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 11 Metro -2 10 0.0 /0. 0.1 qa M % 1 U 9. 9. U 1. U U Y. 4. 9.• 9 % 9.• 9. 9.e qa b 9.i 0.1 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 Metro -2 10 U % 1. U 9 M b. 11/12/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 13 Metro -2 10 0.1 OA P" .1 0.1 a 11WERr ELE . 1 0,2 0~1 0~0 0.0 0,0 0.0 10 . 92 94 U 9., a U U U %fTdk~ 7. 14 Pavilion-3 15 AL B AR 0,1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0,0 LIST OF DRAWINGS: 15 Pavilion-3 15 0'I 0.0 /0.1 0.1 UILDING U U 9,r 1, M (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA= 2275 S.F.) ' qa 9 16 Pavilion-3 15 q. a/ Ar 7. 50 1a M ~~~'q A. 9 9. 0 O.i 0 0,2 y v A. U 5.. 9, 1. M / yLMKI " 0,2 0.1 10. 0 0.0 0.0 Sheet Description - SP-1 KEY MAP SITE PLAN 0.0 Oj 0.0 0~1;~' 0,1 0.2 1, U 5.r 1 4r / /g,,/ / IA 0.2 0,1 0.0 0.0 -PARKING CALCULATIONS 9.. . 1 / qa -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 0.0 0` 0.0 ~0 0.1 9, 1a 9^ > s. M +a b. M I 665 POS ADDI ION !,k,, 1, A,/ o,z on 0,0 0.0 -SANITARY CALCULATIONS -ZONING ANALYSIS V u % M a. 9.7 4y 19T fey a/ . 4, ~b .0 .0 0 J J.0 0 b U 9> U 9.r 1 L 4 I, /a49L// N 0.2 0,1 0.0 0.0 0 9 9, 1 SP-2 'LANDSCAPE PLAN ~ b ba 1, b.+ U 1n U 1 U b• U 9. l M 9.r U U a U n -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE i~ cT b.0 G.o. Q NYi1 0 0. 0.10 M 9. b 0r 9., U 9i 9 M U 9.. U b.• 9a 9a Y° 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -LANDSCAPE NOTES 1 Q > a. M M M ~ M b.• 9., M 1. M 9.. V SP-31 SITE DETAIL /1& a b b. 0 .9.0 11 1 . 9a 9. ~ 1.. a. a. M u u u 9 M b. M M 9.. M b.. M 4P 0.z 10. 1 0.0 0.0 9a 9a M M ba M U M U U U U U U de U 9.• M U b. M 9.. 9.r 9.4 a . SP-4 TRUCK ROUTING PLAN a,0 b. 0. 9.. U 9. M M 4 M M M U M M U U M U b. U 9., U U 4. U U 9. 9M 9 ar'3 0.1 0.1 0,0 0.0 SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY i A 0.0 ,y.0 e ~T~ U 9. U L 9a U M M bJ M U M U be M M M U M 9, U 9. 9n M 9, . 9, q. 9 4 a 0 °•0 ..i M 9~ 9. ba b. M U & b, M b, U b. U 9, U U M 9. 9° M 9.. 9n U 1 b .7 0,7 0,0 0.0 0.0 PH-1'i 'SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ag ~ M M M G. 4 -6 i• 9. 9 9 9.i 9., Y, 9. 9.r a 9 a iky A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS / 0 0 0. 0,0 0,0 9 M 9.. 9. U 4, U 9 9p 7 a '0.1 '0.1 ox M U b 9> U 9 1 9• 93 G• i r ~I' br \L be b+ L . b. 9a L b.• b• (99: 9n 9a A-2 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0 0.0 02 01 0.0 0.0 .0 ba L L 9s 9. 9. 9 9. ,a b '\9+ ba bs L i• L a i b: bi L br 9a bs L L L 9a L 9.r ~a 9. These plans are an Instrument of 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 D.0 9, b 99~ dL ~ a 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 ~ .0 service and are the property of the Engineer. Infringements will be AA- !Jdi!, ~ prosecute. p~ •:•Ci yt ba ba b. bz r ~ .6 0.1 0.0 0.0 ~ .D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 895 7 10 • bn . br L 9a L L v 9+ 9., + L 0.0 .>~'N.S 2^ ga 9a L b. L L + br b• b.• 9r i . L 4r a 9. ba Contractors shall verify all field * _ Im 'W~W; C6iJ ' h• a n;, 42 } S ) 9a L ba 9+ ba conditions and dimensions and 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t0. 0 0.0 r0.0 NEW iVRF UIIUTY 5 p (r. eNYj~ lR, y°.n C O S l K 9w 9a L W DEWALID.O 10 shall be responsible for field fit and " `you quality of work. No allowances p~ta•ogpc00 shall be made on behalf of the Rnrc•'slonia-` Y Contractor for anyerror or neglect on his part. SEAL 0,0 a 0.0 0,0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 ^ ^ 10. 0.0 0.0 OA NY91lDUIJE 0.0 0. 0.3 0.4 .0 ~ m G& YELLOW LINE _ WH11E UNE Project, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o 0 '1 0.0 ~ a 0.0 0.0 Wi UNE A d m)H vARIEa p s R 0. 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 10.1 1 0.0 OA OA 0,0 N WHITE LINE Del. Llp ux OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, r 0.a o.a o.o 'o.0 o.0 0 10 0.0 0.0 0. T U R D ' N E 0.0 .0 0.0 0. 0.0 .0 0. 0.1 .0 D. 0.0 .0 0.0 DDL YELLOW UNE INC. aa~ L DW E 320 FROST POND ROAD .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WHIN 0.0 D.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 D.0 0.0 E a~ OLD BROOKVILLE,NY D.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 J.V tt O.0 0 o.0 0,0 0 ii `UP ~Quv O PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. i SMF UNE NOTE: MAIN RD. & FACTORY) ~O AVENUE THERE ARE INO B CUTS RUNNING 1 S RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE 4,1 ~<v ADJACENT P RTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE TEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE LANE MATTITUCK, NY FOR woR~ FOR WORK ON STATE HIGHWAY AND / SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP ~ ~ TRAFFIC S TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROADWAY DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT IlvIPROVED IMPROVMaNT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25" BY DUNN BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. 1000 142 01 27 . F J I ~V Date: 4.13.09 drawing no. ALL SIiE INFIXiI A SURVEY DAZED 02, ALL SOA D INFORMAMON IS BASED UPON Scale. AS NOTED 1 Scale: A SUFVEY DAZED 02/16/0 /18/08, JOB NO N0, . 06010, eY: I1 1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ~YOLLNwU rTh ~YOLLWITN ? BRUSH PH- 300 LYE MIAT MhNIE SCALE: I" = 201-011 Drawn by: DLS P+; WUE~ i i NEW 54"SQ.x -NEW 54"SO.x 76"H DECORATIVE Cl DECORATIVE CUPOLA KEMPEY ENGINEERING EXIST. BLDG, W/ NEW NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF NEW FACIA BOARD SIGN LIGHTS WITH SHINGLES ROOF SHINGLES TO NEW FACIA NEW NATURAL NEW 7-11 WOOD ANGLE REFLECTOR 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY MATCH ADDITION BOARD SPLIT SHAKES CARVED WALL AT ALL GABLES SIGN SEE DET.3 EXIST, BLDG, W/ NEW WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION P: 631.321.7777 F: 631.661.0486 E+ 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EXIST, BLDG. W/ EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW NEW FACIA 6DARD 0 Ern O FACIA BOARD TO MATCH ADDITION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 TO MATCH ADDITION I Mi 111TH 1111 ii-TI-IT-11 P. 631.368.3324 I I W-1 I I 1 11 11 wilil 11 1 1 11 11 11 11- F. 631.368.1524 E F~ EXIST, BLDG, W/ NEW HARDIPLANK EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW SIDING IN LIGHT HARDIPLANK SIDING IN N GRAY TONE LIGHT CRAY TONE REVISIONS: NEW PRECAST C. . LEDGE is CON NEW 4" PRECAST CONC. LEDGE Date Description No. 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS DATED 03/13/08 NEW 6" CONC. CURB 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE NEW 6" CONC. CURB INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GRADE GRADE 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF NEW 10" SQUARE DECORATIVE NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, NEW MAIN ENTRANCE DOORN JTRANCE DOORWAY NEW HARDIPLANK NEW PICTURE INDOWS W/ WHITE TRIM SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. COLUMNS WITH 12" SQUARE NANTUCKET STYLE WITH W/ TRANSOM WINDOW ABOVI I WINDOW ABOVE SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY & SDL DIVIDED LIGHT PANELS TYP. TONE ALL NEW WIND W LOC. STONE BASE, TYP, 0 ALL 7 LOC. PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD STRIPE STANDARDS -STANDARD COLORS 3M FILM MATERIAL IATERIAL COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 A-RED C- GREEN 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 3680-53 (CARDINAL RED) 3680-58 (DARK GREEN) COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 1 SOUTH ELEVATION EQUIVALENT PMS # 1797 EQUIVALENT PMS # 342 AVERY # 10836-7-11 RED AVERY # 10835-7 11 GREEN LIST OF DRAWINGS: A-1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" B-ORANGE D- WHITE 3623 (BRIGHT ORANGE) Sheet, Description EQUIVALENT PMS # 165 E-BRONZE AVERY # 10837-7 11 ORANGE PANTONE 19-1116 SP-1 TKEY MAP SrFE PLAN PARKING CALCULATIONS ;DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 9 B A _ in SANITARY CALCULATIONS ;ZONING ANALYSIS, B ~ ~ N N SP-2: ,LANDSCAPE PLAN f LANDSCAPESCHEDULE I iv N ,LANDSCAPE NOTE§ ~Evin 0 ° N! fn SP-3 SITE DETAIL A F. o0 00 SP-4 I•TRUCK ROUTING PLAN E C A D m cn SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY 3'-011 3'-611 31-00 PH-1 I-SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN NEW 54"SQ,x -NEW 54"SO,x 76"H i DECORATIVE C DECORATIVE CUPOLA 10f-2t1 A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS rrr A r r nrIIr D_7 LEAST ANiI WFRT Fi.RV ATif1NS I J -11 Vum WALl"JIVI-4 tTM i EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW SCALE; 1/2° = P-0" EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION MATCH ADDITION q,tQ.W hEMn~. These plans are an Instrument of service and are the property of the Engineer. Infringements vdll be}, , prosecuted. I e Contractors shall verify all field conditions and dimensions and N shall be responsible for field fit and qualityofwork. No allowances EXIST. BLDG. W/ EXIST. BLDG. W/ 'NEW FACIA BOARD TO shall be made on behalf of the 6 NEW FACIA BOARD MATCH ADDITION Contractor fo~ gnyerror or neglect i, TO MATCH ADDITION on his part. , SEAL GAMA_DEER RK, i i y EXIST. BLDG. W/ I INC. 51 NEW HARDIPLANX EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW q SIDING IN LIGHT HARDIPLANK SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY TONE 320 FROST POND ROAD I' n GRAY TONE OLD BROOKVILLE,NY \ NEW SERVICE 7-ELEVEN, INC',~ ENTRACE DOOR I MAIN RD. & FACTORY;, Y AVENUE I~ MATTITUCK, NY NEW 6" / NEW 6" CONC. CURB CONC. CURB u SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP GRAD SEC. BLK. LOT GRADE 6 142 01 27 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. I I ~ AS NOTED Z NORTH ELEVATION ='l A A-1 SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" M.C. I I I i I NEW 54"SO.x 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA KEMPEY ENGINEERING NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF EXIST EXIST. BLDG. NEW 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY SIGN LIGHT WITH SHINGLES ROOF ROOF SHINGLES S TO i ANGLE REFLECTOR MATCI MATCH ADDITION WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 i P: 631.321.7777 NEW NATURAL SPLIT SHAKES F: 631.661.0486 AT ALL GABLES L EXIST. BLDG, W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION! 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 NEW 7-11 WOOD Lmiul CARVED WALL SIGN BEYOND P. 631.368.3324 F. 631.368.1524 't EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW FACIA BOARD TO NEW FACIA BOARD NEW HARDIPLANK SIDING IN LIGHT MATCH ADDITION GRAY TONE EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW REVISIONS: NEW 10" SQUARE HARDIPLANK SIDING IN H DECORATIVE COLUMNS WITH 12" SQUARE LIGHT GRAY TONE STONE BASE, TYP. Date Description No. g ALL 7 LOC. - NEW 4" PRECAST CONCRETE LEDGE 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS DATED 03/13/08 NEW 6" CONC, 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 CURB NEW 6" CONC. CURB BEYOND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE GRADE 1.1 ld GRADE INCORPORATED TOWN F SOUTHOLD 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 O COMMENTS NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF NANTUCKET STYLE WITH PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 3 FAST ELEVA-RON COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 A'2 SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0" I LIST OF DRAWINGS: Sheet Description SP-1 -KEY MAP •SPIE PLAN PARKING CALCULATIONS -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS -SANITARY CALCULATIONS -ZONING ANALYSIS NEW DECOR NEW 54"SO.x 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA SP-2 LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE -LANDSCAPE NOTES 4~z EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW NEW ROOF NEW GOOSENECK SP-3 SITE DETAIL SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN ROOF SHINGLES TO SHINGLES SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY MATCH ADDITION SIGN LIGHT WITH ANGLE REFLECTOR , PN-1 CTT'FPT4nT(IAADTDlrDT AAT NEW NATURAL SPLIT SHAKES AT ALL GABLES i I A-1 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS I EXIST' BLDG. W/ A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS 11. NEW ROOF v co SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION These plans are an Instrument of service and are the property of the NEW 7-11 WOOD Engineer. infringements will be prosecuted. w m I III Hill 11 Ll a CARVED WALL SIGN BEYOND E+ Contractors shall verify all field sm'+`~ EXIST. BLDG. W/ conditions and dimensions and 1 + 4 NEW FACIA BOARD shall be responsible for field fit and quality of work. No allowances \ p a TO MATCH ADDITION N NEW HARDIPLANK NEW FACIA BOARD SIDING shall be made on behalf of the EwsT. BLDG. W/ Contractor for anyertor or neglect N NEW HARMPLANK NEW 10" S IUARE on his part. SEAL SIDING IN LIGHT DECORATIVE COLUMNSI; WITH 12" SQUARE GRAY TONE STONE BASE, TYP. GAMA DEER PARK, Y ALL 7 LOC. V INC. NEW 4" PRECAST CONCRETE LEDGE NEW 4" PRECAST CONCRETE LEDGE 320 FROST POND ROAD NEW 6° CONC. NEW 6" CONC. OLD BROOKVILLE,NY CURB BEYOND CURB GRAD 7-ELEVEN, INC.' ~ GRADE NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, NANTUCKET STYLE WITH MAIN RD. & FACTORY PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP I 4 WEST ELEVATION SEC. BLK. LOT I A-2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 142 01 27 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. AS NOTED li M.C. L i 7-11 -11 CONVENIENCE STORE ROA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25 MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK NYSDOT CASE NO. 01-099P T h 9`y° SITE ?may F v 'Ypc`y F LOCATION MAP SCALE: I"= 200' DEC - NOVEMBER 30, 2010 SHEET NO. DWG. NO. DESCRIPTION 1 - TITLE SHEET 2 MD-1 TYPICAL SECTION AND MISCELLANEO LLANEOUS DETAILS 3 RP-1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN kN DUNN 4 PM-1 PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING PL NING PLAN 5 TSP-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN SIGNAL NO. 83 _ NO. 83.6 NYS ROUTE 25 AT FACTORY AVEJSIGSBEE RD. ENGINEERING 6 TSP-2 MICROCOMPUTER SIGNAL OPERATIO 'ERATION SPECIFICATIONS - SIGNAL NO. 83.6 7-8 MPT-1 - MPT-2 MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF' ION OF TRAFFIC PLAN ASSOCIATES, P. C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach. N.Y. 11978 DEC - 6 2010 (631) 288-2480 I I NOTES: 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VARIES - 4'-0' MINIMUM VARIES I FOR CONTINUATION LATEST STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE NEW YORK V-0" :WALK AREA SEE SITE PLANS STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. PROPOSED FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT PROPOSED SIDEWALK AREA 2. TACK COAT SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN EVERY ASPHALT LIFT, 4'-0' W-0' VARIES AND THE JOINTS BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED WIDENING EDGES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITEM 407.0101. EXISTING R.O.W. LINE VARIES PROPOSED PROPOSED DEDICATION 'ION DEDICATION LINE ARIES 6'-6"f VARIES EXISTING SIDEWALK AREA EXISTING PLANTER G PLANTER EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN 11_ FT - VARIES ARIES d a a d a EM 1060 4' CONCRETE SIDEWALK -IT 1LK -ITEM 10806.0105 PARTIAL DEPTH SAWCUT-ITEM 10520.09 4' TOPSOIL AND SEEDIN( -AND SEEDING - ITEMS 613.02 AND 610.0203 314' EXPANSION JOINT MILL EXISTING PAVEMENT - ITEM 490.30 d 7" TACK COAT- ITEM 407.0101 (SEE NOTE 2) TOP OF REMOVE EXISTING CURBS AND CONCRETE CURB-TYPE VF-150 PROPOSED FULL DEPTH SAWCUT - ITEM 10520.09 ITEM DESCRIPTION SIDEWALK UNDER ITEM 203.02 ITEM 10609.040105 PAVEMENT 1-112' SUPERPAVE HMA TOP COURSE- ITEMS 402.098101 AND 402.098111 TACK COAT- ITEM 407.0101 (SEE NOTE 2) 722-1/22'SU - 2-112' SUPERPAVE HMA BINDER COURSE- ITEMS 402.198901 AND 402.198911 a ' . - 5' SUPERPAVE HMA BASE COURSE - ITEM 402.378901 AND 402.378911 LIMIT OF UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL- ITEM 203.02 e Fo - 8' SUBBASE COURSE - ITEM 17304.101199 as s TYPICAL SECTION C- N (LOOKING NORTH ALONG FACTORY AVE) a NOT TO SCALE 203.02 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL 17304.101199 SUBBASE COURSE-TYPE 1011.2 402,098101 9.5MM F1 SUPERPAVE HMA, 80 SERIES COMPACTION CONCRETE CURB TYPE VF-150 402.098111 PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.098101M DETAIL 402.196901 19MM F9 SUPERPAVE HMA 80 SERIES COMPACTION 402198911 PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.198901M ITEM 10609.040105 402.378901 37.5MM F9 SUPERPAVE HMA, 80 SERIES COMPACTION SPECIAL NOTES FOR PG BINDER AND MIX DESIGN LEVEL NOT TO SCALE 402.378911 PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.378901M (APPLICABLE TO ALL SECTION 402 HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) ITEMS) 407.0101 TACK COAT 490.30 MISCELLANEOUS COLD MILLING OF BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PG BINDER CURB NOTES: 10520.05 SAWCUTTING PCC AND COMPOSITE PAVEMENT 10520.09 SAWCUTTING ASPHALT CONCRETE USE A PG 70-22 BINDER MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M320, STANDARD 1. 3/4" PREMOLDED BITUMINOUS JOINT FILLER SHALL BE 608.0102 ACCELERATED CURE CONCRETE SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAYS SPECIFICATION FOR PERFORMANCE GRADED ASPHALT BINDER FOR THE PLACED IN JOINTS AT 20' TO 25' INTERVALS ALONG THE 10608.0105 CONCRETE SIDEWALK- UNREINFORCED(GRADING INCLUDED) PRODUCTION OF HMA MIXTURES. LENGTH OF THE CURB; WHERE CURB ABUTS DRAINAGE 10609.040105 CONCRETE CURB TYPE VF-150 (GRADING INCLUDED) USE OF POLYPHOSPHORIC ACID (PPA) TO MODIFY THE PG BINDER PROPERTIES IS CASTINGS; AND AT ALL PC'S AND PT'S; AS ORDERED BY 610.0203 ESTABLISHING-TURF PROHIBITED FOR MIXTURES CONTAINING LIMESTONE, LIMESTONE AS AN AGGREGATE THE ENGINEER. 613.02 PLACINGTOPSOIL-TYPE A BLEND COMPONENT, LIMESTONE AS A CONSTITUENT IN CRUSHED GRAVEL dui AGGREGATE, OR RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (RAP) THAT INCLUDES ANY LIMESTONE. THISPROHIBITION ALSOAPPLIES TOTHE USE OF PPAASA QQ CROSS-LINKING AGENT FOR POLYMER MODIFICATION. MIX DESIGN 314" EXPA 314" EXPANSION JOINT AND LIMIT OF S" SIDI OF 6" SIDEWALK- ITEM 608.0102 SIDEWALK RAMP GENERAL NOTES: THE MIXTURE DESIGNS MUST BE DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CRITERIA DEC-62010 1. LANDINGS SHALL HAVE NO SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2% OR 1:50 IN ANY SPECIFIED IN THE HMA ITEMS THAT ARE APPROPRIATE FORAN "ESTIMATED TRAFFIC" DIRECTION. LEVEL OF <10 MILLION ESALS. 1:12 MAX. 1:12 MAX. (TYP.) 2. RAMPS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 5.0 FT. EXCLUDING THE WIDTH / 314' EXPANSION JOINT AND LIMIT OF ANY FLARED SIDES OR RETURNS. OF 6" SIDEWALK - ITEM 608.0102 3. AT MARKED CROSSINGS THE FULL WIDTH OF THE RAMP SHALL BE WHOLLY CONTAINED WITHIN THE MARKING. THE SIDES OF THE RAMPS (THE FLARES) NEED NOT BE WITHIN THE WIDTH OF THE MARKINGS. LANDING 1:50 (2%) MAX. (TYP.) NYSDOT CASE NO. 01-099P 4. CURB RAMP SLOPES: A. IN NEW CONSTRUCTION, THE SLOPE SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 1:12 (8.3%) o° 0 B. IN ALTERATIONS, THE SLOPE OF A RAMP SHOULD NOT BE STEEPER HIGHWAY PAVEMENT CURB RAMP VARIES EDGE OF SIDEWALK U° 077) DUNN V14" SIDEWALK ENGINEERING THAN 1:12 (8.3%) BUT A SLOPE OF 1:10 (10%) IS PERMITTED NOTE: FOR A RISE OF NO MORE THAN 6 IN. IF THE DISTANCE FROM TOP OF °DOo TEM 10808.0105 ASSOCIATES, P.C. C. WHERE IT IS FLUSH, SMOOTH 2• 8• TRANSITION Consulting Engineers A SLOPE NO STEEPER ILTH N 1:8 25% CAN BE USLOPE SED FOR NO MORE TS RAMP TO BACK EDGE OF SIDEWALK IS 4'-0" OR GREATER, THE SLOPE C THAN A 3 IN. RISE. ON THE SIDE FLARES MAY BE 1:10 WIRE FABRIC 66 Main Street D. WHERE IT IS INFEASIBLE TO MEET ANY OF THE SLOPE REQUIREMENTS LISTED ABOVE, THE SLOPE OF A CURB RAMP SHALL BE AS FLAT AS Weethempton Beech, NY 11918 (631)280.2480 POSSIBLE. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR THE RAMP TO BE 0 / SIDEWALK CURB RAMP ITEM 808.0102 /DETECTABLE WARNING FIELD LONGER THAN B FT. IECLD~•1 5. THE SURFACE OF ALL CURB RAMPS SHALL BE STABLE, FIRM AND SLIP RESISTANT. A COARSE BROOM FINISH RUNNING PERPENDICULAR (SEE OTE NO.9,ATYP.JAMP GENERAL SECTION C-C N NERAL TO THE SLOPE IS ACCEPTABLE ON CONCRETE RAMPS. NOT TO SCALE 8. ALL RAMP TRANSITIONS SHALL BE FLUSH AND FREE OF ABRUPT CHANGES, CURB SIDEWALK I EWALK CURB RAMP TYPE 4 7-11 MATrITUCK SLOPES OF ADJOINING GUTTERS AND ROAD SURFACES SHALL BE 1:20 (5%) FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 2 FT.FOR THE FULL WIDTH OF THE RAMP. 1:12 SEE NOTE) V-0" MIN. 1:12 SEE NOTE HIGHWAY PAVEMENT N NOT TO SCALE 7. ANY RAISED ISLAND THAT FALLS WITHIN A CROSSWALK SHALL BE CUT THROUGH LEVEL WITH THE STREET (PROVIDING APPROPRIATE SIDE FLARE RAMP SIDE FLARE SURFACE DRAINAGE)) OR HAVE CURB RAMPS A EITHER END WITH A LEVEL AREA. D AT LEAST 4 FT. LONG BETWEEN THE RAMPS. 8. COORDINATE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, UTILITY LOCATIONS, SIGNS, REVISIONS STREET FURNITURE AND DRAINAGE TO ENSURE A CONTINUOUS ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AT ALL CURB RAMP LOCATIONS. GUIDANCE FOR DETECTABLE WARNING FIELD NO. DATE DESCM"10N By TYPICAL SECTION & CROSSWALK MARKINGS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IS PROVIDED IN THE MUTCD. DRAINAGE GRATES AND UTILITY ACCESS COVERS ARE NOT (SEE SIDEWALK RAMP GENERAL ALLOWED IN RAMP WALKING SURFACES OF THEIR LANDINGS. NOTE NO. 9) MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 9. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NYSDOT TYPE 8 SIDEWALK CURB R/ CURB RAMP DETAIL ELEVATION D-D CURB DATE SCALE DEANO. STANDARD SHEET 608-01. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE EMBEDDED TYPE 04118/08 ASSHOWN 28104.011-MID-1 CONFORMING TO NYSDOT ITEM 608.21 AND SHALL BE AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. MAY BE USED IN STRAIGHT OR CURVEC OR CURVED CURB SECTIONS NOT TO SCALE DESIGNED BY DRAFTED BV SHEET NO. NOT TO SCALE KALE A.G. A.G. OF WALL CRNR 'w hm TC 19 ]5 T'H 21 92 lVl 21.92 1 ON rv'rv RC 16 BW 16.77 GONG RETAINING WALL EW 1896 0.7'E %1660 a u m TW 21 67 0EL TREE 2oN END EL 214.05 ! A^y OELL•2316 BW iB.6fi }rv 12" TREE 12" TREE •r~^pt EL 24.12 M' LM } EL 2288 0EL 23.02 2) 12' TREE IO" BUSN GUSH I 12' TREE 2 „fh, EL 2390 B R U 5 H El 2439 EL EL 23 JO EL 22.6 EL x 36 '"Gf15 LIGHT SEWER ELEC 34.59 VENT METER 10" MEE RAIL 23'60 24.17 2524 % EL 24.63 2526 \ - 2543 I BW 1092 23.10 2 .82 24. 0 J / 12" TREE RAMS GUARD EL 24.77 SHED i 2 r 2 COVER r EXIST. ONE STORY - 25.11 L 2369 GUARD - i pi. BRICK BUILDING RAIL 2 4 2 (GAS STATION) w xte.zs x1775 x 1).)s Je h L rv N. nn rv h PROPOSED 7-11 CONVENIENCE STORE 2 h' $ 3'm 4.7 COVEN SAWACUT EXISTING PAVEMENT 2 BE 0 2'm GRATE 25.41 2539 N$ EL 2479 ELJ 24.)]vER ITEM 10520.09 VOy / 0~ ®EL 22.5] x 2 32 m 30 COVER 6' MEE 2'0 COVER EL 2491 2480 w TIN 21.87 4' CONCRETE SIDEWALK A EL 2375 EL 23.81 ® BC 2 74 BC 25.00 TO 25.31 TO 25.30 TO 25 4 24 9 ~,9 eW 19.5) ITEM 10608.0105 y SC 2505 BC 25.05 BC 25. 9 W / MTORING L6'P COVER J' L v COVEF 24 EL 2477 COVER COVER 3,0 / rv o / 3.77 EL 24 ] L E, EL - 2473 E67 - EL 2 2449 94 U m~ I EL 24.81 ry Nry GAS PUMP L6b COVER A v, mm / rv ISLAND EL 24.72 3'Y COVER ' d 'Dl~'`P N { - VENT 3 NTT14 EL 2_4.46 d 2'3( PIPES m 24.53 % _ TL 25.39 TO 2539 x I % Y 2441 LL COWMIJ L. L) MLION L24.98 M,9C 24.69 EC 24.69 EL 2467 3'd G]lER NY EL L } EXIST. } 2440x EL 24.56 x19.14 %169° 1e 90 BUILDING V x 24.67 (TYP) 1 fi'm COVER 24.23 OVERHEAD d10Pr EL 249 ; 2 09 I BW 19 J2 SEE SITE PLANS 8 ITE PLANS BY KEMPEY ENGINEERING (ICE CREAM) 4Q / 41 "'"`BETE PAD IORK AT PROPOSED SITE ACCESS. ' . ; FORWO x RK AT PRI / N° A 24.91 2ELm 24 GRfi0ATE ® 2 EL 23.r 92 COVER GAS PUMP B yy l ISLAND SHOPPIN R fl SHOPPING CENTER COLUMPI iL 25.02 COLUM" %2401 a 26.0 PROPOSED EL 24864~~' • EL 24.54 a TC 20.32 26'1 DEDICATION ac tie°0 23.35% EL 23.87' CONCRETE CURB TYPE VF-150 / 24.9fi 24.39 ~1- am x6.v LINE x25.28 HONE BASE 1 CD TC 20,40 TC 19.23 ITEM 10509.040105 m m / BUSHES EL 24.96 EL 24,31 EL 95 CONCRETE TO 20 40 EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE 25.96 j.ry 91614 m RETAINING WALL \ PLANTER 23 25.96 W .5 REMOVED UNDER ITEM 201.06 a w / p 6" BUSH 24.62 2M1.0_% 0_,_ 27.04___ _ BW 008 Be 19.] t U 2 1 25.78 25.}Q _ 25.55 24.80 "24.04 _ 7 _ uo' n LI 6" BU H 2 .0 { MATE 0 89 -a ~9 6" BUSHC EL 2451 EL 2 17 ~V \ 22.51 \1% )EL P350 2Jry CRNR rv /]P EL 24.6{ \ \ q L 6x/ 2.3'E _6 TC 26,/5~6 / N1 342 6cW- T_ 5' 0 6' BU SH R E 22H4 6" BUSH r EL 2429 \ EL 2420 \ (_12 1L° BUSH lC 21.01 ,E~~'TP 4 + EL 22.81 TC 21.01 TC 19.29 TIC 26.71 26.1 TO 26.5fi 6C 28.2] / N 26.1 T~-, 24 F" 6" eU -W 6" BUSH E BU50L-14A 2144 i-nLznC 4 ID A, 6 TC202 _BC=1.0=. 0_21'=1 21145- N BC 2484 C 24.0 3' TO 24.07 TO 23.6 - SC 23.65 23.36 T - 20.84 -r- - BC 22 92 B 20.43 MAIN Rp 2 20.5 x26, -Re 25) 129 u %2496 26 92 ry} 24.04% x2325 EXISTING R.O.W. LINE x26.28 %24'76 21.57x ~~~I((( x2503 121.53 x2341 21.66% x20.49 / X26.23 26.0 26.0 26.26 T 26.31 TC .09 6 B 5.56 .3 1 TO .09 TO 2595 %2 43 'e S OR RC 2554 TC 25.32 TO 24.53 I / TC 26 6C .16 "pp B 2 .87 BC 24.08 TO 2313 UP fioo • / 22 UP S 6 Hif v EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND i GUTTER,TO REMAIN 4' CONC `BETE E SIDEWALK d'. I =<cl ITEM 10681 \ 4' TOPSOIL AND ESTABLISHING TURF _ ITEMS 513.02 AND 510.0203 Q' J SIDEWALK CURB RAMP TYPE 8 ASSUMED NEW LOCATION OF =YICTIMA NIVT Ada PnI F Tn RP / I WITH DETECTABLE WARNINGS n RELOCATED BY OTHERS LLCONC (SEE DETAILS ON ETE CURB TYPE ~ 50NG NO. \ DEC - 6 2010 ITEM 10800.040105 SAWCUT AND MEET EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER \ SIDEWALK CURB RAMP TYPE 4 REMOVE EXISTING SIDEWALK UNDER ITEM 10520.05 WITH DETECTABLE WARNINGS CURB RAMP UNDER ITEM 203.02 - - (SEE DETAILS ON DRAWING NO. MO-1) 4' CONCR 4' CONCRETE SIDEWALK ITEM 1080 ITEM 10808.0105 NYSDOT CASE NO. 01-099P REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND APRON UNDER ITEM 203.02 LEGEND: DUNN ENGINEERING PROPOSED FULL ASSOCIATES, P.C. DEPTH ASPHALT Consulting Engineers PAVEMENT 66 Mein Street NOTES: PROPOSED Weslhempton Beech, NV 11878 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST STANDARDS AND 8. THE CONTRACTOR (PERMITEE) SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR N CONCRETE (631) 288.2488 SPECIFICATIONS OF THE NEWYORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. AND SHALL REPLACE ALL SIGNAL INTERCONNECT CABLE, DETECTOR CABLE, CONDUIT AND ALL UNDERGROUND SIDEWALK 2. ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED ACCESSORY EQUIPMENT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. THAT OTHER UTILITIES MAY EXIST WITHIN THE WORK AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A FULL MARK-OUT OF EXISTING UTILITIES. AVOIDANCE OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS 7. PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK AT THIS LOCATION, THE 7-11 MATTITUCK THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR WHO SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR MY CONTRACTOR(PERMITEE) SHALL NOTIFY THE NEW YORK STATE DAMAGE AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION THAT ATONE-OUT OF SIGNAL EQUIPMENT IS NEEDED. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DIG TEST PITS TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND DEPTH OF ANY UTILITIES WHERE A CONFLICT MAY EXIST. ANY CONFLICTS SHALL BE B. ALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ATRAFFIC BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIVE OPERATION AND ALL INTERCONNECT, WHERE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING HIS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITH THOSE OF THE EXISTING, SHALL BE MAINTAINED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVISIONS UTILITY COMPANIES. PAY A LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CHARGE OF $500.00 PER Na MM DATE DESCRIPTION BY ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN CALENDAR DAY IF ACTUATION AND COORDINATION IS 4. EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES LOCATED IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED NOT MAINTAINED. DURING CONSTRUCTION UNDER ITEM 10209.12 -SILT PROTECTION FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. STRUCTURES LOCATED IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED UNDER 9. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED BETWEEN REFERENCE MARKERS ITEM 10209.11-TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER BAG FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. 2597041528 AND 25-04041529. DATE SCALE DEANO. 08/11109 1. - 20' 28104.00-RP-1 5. EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE CLEANED UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION DESIONEO BY DRAFTED BY SHEET NO, p AO.B.E. 1 E03=11 REVISE 03=10 REVISED PER NYSDOT COMMENTS DATED 12106W A.D. A.G. A.G. 3 OF ° li / U WALL CBNR LW 21.92 TW 21 92 1 0'N / BW 128.977 ..NC RETAINING WALL BW 1896 ° YE / TW 21.87 WALL END BW 19 BE 2.0'N NOTES: / / 1. ALL PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES WITH NEW YORK TW 21.89 STATE SUPPLEMENT. BW 1892 SPEED iPEED J , 2. ALL EXISTING SIGNS SHALL REMAIN UNLESS EXIST. ONE STORY OTHERWISE INDICATED TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. LIMIT LIMIT BRICK BUILDING 35 3 5 ; (OAS STATION) p PROPOSED 7-11 CONVENIENCE TOR TW 21.87 o BW 19 57 SEE SITE PLANS BY PLANS BY KEMPEY ENGINEERING EXIST. BUILDING FOR WORK AT PROP RKAT PROPOSED SITE ACCESS, (ICE CREAM) TW 1921 86 :72 8W 9J2 44 3 RELOCATE SHOPPIN ~r ~Ijg ITEM 647.11 SHOPPING CENTER REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT FACTORY AVE MARKINGS UNDER ITEM 835.0103 (TYP.) CDNBEE 888.01 -12" WHITE PREFORMED CROSSWALK LINE (TYP.) RETAINING WALL 388.01- 24" WHITE PREFORMED ew 2a a A °ia STOP BAR 888.04- WHITE PREFORMED WALL ERNE .1'14 PAVEMENT SYMBOL 23E i MAIN __-ROAD _ - .R. 25 25 - - - - 0704 :]7'4] 1529 ii it SPEED SIGSBEE RD ~~V LIMIIT MARLENE LA STOMPING r' i REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS UNDER ITEM 635.0103 (TYPJ ~U 25 No 111 688.01 •18" WHITE PREFORMED CROSSWALK BAR PER HYSDOT DEC-62010 REGION 10 STAGGERED CROSSWALK LK 635.0303 - CLEANING STOPPING OF PAVEMENT AND ANY DETAILS (TYP.) OF PAVEMENT SURFRFACESSYMARYM80LS TIME 688.01 -12" WHITE PREFORMED IED CROSSWALK BAR PER NYSDOT OT REGION 10 STAGGERED CROSSWALK DETAILS (TYP.) W WALK NYSDOT CASE NO. 01-099P DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C. Consulting Engineers 69 Main Street WauhamptaR !lush, NY 10M (831)288.2480 7-11 MATTITUCK REVISIONS NQ DATE +TE DascRlPrioN BY PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING PLAN DATE SCALE DEA NO, 08/11109 1 = 20' 28104.00-l DESIGNED BY DRAFTED By SHEETNO. p 7 032W10 REVISED P "I'D REVISED PER NYSDOT COMMENTS DATED 1 ZWIDQ A.D. A.G. C.S.D. 4 OF 8 Il i SEQUENCE TABLE-SIGNAL NO. 83.6 FACES p 1,2 4 5,6 7 8 9 10 12,13 14,15 m~ / LIGHT SEWEq ENT TIN 21,139 H A S O BW 18 92 Jc~ l / O O Me O . 66 _ 2'0 Co~ R E © ~ © @ @ z / EXIST. ONE STORY BRICK BUILDING ~V (GAS STATION) PROPOSED 7-11 CONVENIENCE STORE SIZE 12" 12" 12" 12" 12 12 12" - - 2'o ASE 02 + 05 R --G G R R R R DW DW 03~ / O 2'a co R O TW 21.87 0 I BW 19.57 / 680.5001 o 02 + 06 G R G R R R R DW DW NlTOgwc 03880.8150 03 R R R G G R R DW * DW * 4 Qf 680.6708 680.730514(2) 680.813103 04 R R R R R G G DW DW 03 680.813105(2) I NTT14 10680.8225 FLASH Y R Y R R R R - - 680.8142 E EXIST. r T6 PHASES 2 d 6 SHALL BE ON MINIMUM RECALL GREEN. Bu. BUILDING ~ W 21 96 EW 19 72 X SHALL BE A STEADY'WALK• INDICATION FOLLOWED BY A'DONT WALK' UPON ACTUATION. (ICE (ICE CREAM) Y¢ CRATE / O 10206.0310 3 68( 880.520106 680.520108 NOTES: 68( 680.730514 PROPOSED 880.730514 SHOPPING CENTER 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NYS DOT REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL 80.5001 DEDICATION LINE DETAIL SHEETS AND NYS STANDARD SHEETS. 031 03680. 10680.79 I 680.6708 FED POLE, HEADS, 2. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE 6180.730514(3) 68( REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SECTION TO PERFORM AN INSPECTION OF THE EXISTING TRAFFIC 68( 680.730519 / FOUNDATION 680.813103 CONCRETE SIGNAL EQUIPMENT. AFTER THE INSPECTION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST THEN SUBMITA WRITTEN 680.730514(3) 68( 880.813105 _ RETAINING WALL NOTIFICATION WITH THE DATE THEY WILL ASSUME TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE. NO WORK 880.730514@ 880.6142 10880.5105 - TW 21.96 TW 2019 .s BW 20.08 9W 19 70 - SHALL PROCEED ON THE CONTRACT UNTIL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE IS ASSUMED. THE - 680.730514(3 _ DET 33 _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNDER ITEM 619.1611 EXCEPT FOR THE 3 ASSUMED NEW LOCATION WALL GEAR 2.3 IN CONTROLLER, PROGRAMMING, AND TIMING WHICH WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE STATE. Nn342 rnAZ _ - _ 302 B OF NYT 343 (BY OTHERS) 2.3'E r 'T 10680.79 PULLBOX 3. ALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ATRAFFIC RESPONSIVE OPERATION AND ALL INTERCONNECT, WHERE EXISTING, SHALL BE MAINTAINED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY A LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CHARGE OF $500.00 PER CALENDAR DAY IF ACTUATION AND a 680.730514(2) rvrraAa / = - - - - - - - - - - _r-~ a-- c_T - G W w _ TE~E _ OV COORDINATION IS NOT MAINTAINED. 1 --T- 2 / - I 4. ALL VEHICLE DETECTION AND SIGNAL COORDINATION MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. / SPLICING OF INDUCTANCE LOOP WIRE, SHIELDED LEAD-IN CABLE AND INTERCONNECT CABLE MAIN - - - ROAD (S.R. 25)---]-- SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR TEMPORARY REPAIRS DURING CONSTRUCTION ONLY. TEMPORARY QJ,y nO2 D IET 55 LOOP DETECTORS, IF NECESSARY, SHALL BE 6'x8', BE CNTERED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE LANE,AND PAID FOR UNDER ITEMS 680.54 AND 680.72.OTHER TYPES OF TEMPORARY DETECTION MAY BE USED UPON APPROVAL OF THE REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SECTION. 5. TRAFFIC SIGNAL TURN-ON SHALL BE DONE BY NYS TRAFFIC SIGNAL PERSONNEL ONLY. THE / DET 66 55 ® o ® 06 r 66 680!430514 CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY A LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CHARGE OF $10,000 IF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IS / TURNED ON (INCLUDING FLASHING OPERATION) WITHOUT NYS TRAFFIC SIGNAL PERSONNEL PRESENT. FAILURE TO HAVE NYS TRAFFIC SIGNAL PERSONNEL PRESENT MAY JEOPARDIZE B ~ I 10680.5105 10680.77 FUTURE PERMIT APPROVALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE NYS TRAFFIC SIGNAL - - - f- - - - - - - ua ~l - I INTERCEPT EXISTING CONDUIT SECTION TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO THE REQUESTED DATE OF TURN-ON. AERIAL INTERCON ECT °P°• / NOTE 11 did 10680.77 0up Q \ 8. ALL DETECTORS SHALL BE CENTERED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE LANES AND SPACED 10FT. APART TO DET 22 N T i 10206.0310 680.520203(2) UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLAN. / / 10680.79 2 301 a 880.72(4) 7. ALL PEDESTRIAN POLES SHALL BE 8 FEET HIGH. ALL PEDESTRIAN INSTRUCTION SIGNS SHALL / PULLBOX ~ 808.0102 10208.0310 680.54 BE R10-3E FROM THE M.U.T.C.D. WITH INTERNATIONAL SYMBOLS. \ \ ~4q a / 680.520108 \ 60821 680.72 680.730514(2) 10680.0105 8. THE 680.730514(4)I v THE STATE. ALL OTHER IEQUIPMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BYTHE CONTRACTOR. EXISTING i / 1 ~ may. 4 TURNS PARALLEL (8x6) CONDUIT WHICH IS NOT TO BE REUSED AND DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH OTHER PROPOSED ~vy~J WORK SHALL BE ABANDONED IN PLACE. QJ i PED BUTTON, \ PED HEADS I.. I I~ 'I II 9. WHERE PAVEMENT IS RESURFACED, ALL INDUCTANCE LOOPS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO / 10206.0310 \ \ THE INSTALLATION OF THE FINAL ASPHALT TOP COURSE. J J / 680.520108 / 880.730514 \ \ DEC 6 2010 11 10. UTILITY POLE # 343 TO BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS. / 04 10609.040105 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PULL BACK THE SHIELDED LEAD IN CABLE AT NYT 345 TO ALLOW DET 44 10680.5105 Q I FOR INTERCEPTION OF THE EXISTING CONDUIT, REMOVE PULLBOX A, SHORTEN THE CONDUIT, INSTALL THE NEW PULLBOX AND REINSTALL LEAD-IN CABLE. 10206.0310 680.520108 680.730514 NYSDOT CASE NO. 01-099P 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE PULLBOX C UNDER ITEM 680.79 AND EXTEND THE THREE INCH CONDUIT TO THE NEW PULLBOX B. NEW 5 CONDUCTOR CABLE (ITEM 680.730514) SHALL BE THEN RUN FROM THE NEW PEDESTRIAN EQUIPMENT TO THE CONTROLLER. 680.5001 03680.8150 680.6708 DUNN 680.730514 ENGINEERING 680.813103 ASSOCIATES, P.C. 680.613105 Consulting Engineers 10680.8225 880.8142 W Main Street Westhampton Beech, NY 11878 ESTIMATE OF QUANTITIES (831)288.2480 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY 10206.0310 CONDUIT EXCAVATION AND RESTORATION LF 118 619.1613 MAINTAIN TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT (REQUIREMENT C INTM 680.5001 POLE EXCAVATION AND FOUNDATION CY 3 10680.5105 RECTANGULAR PULLBOX - 26"x18" REINF. CONCRETE EA 3 7-11 MATTITUCK 03680.8150 PEDESTRIAN COUNTDOWN TIMERS EA 4 680,520108 CONDUIT - 3 NPS, STEEL, ZINC COATED LF 100 680.520203 CONDUIT-1 NPS STEEL FLEXIBLE LF 20 680.54 INDUCTANCE LOOP INSTALLATION EA 2 680.6708 TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE - POST TOP MOUNT 8 FT. EA 2 REVISIONS 660.72 INDUCTANCE LOOP WIRE LF 100 NO, DATE ATE DESCRI"ION By 11 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN 680.730514 SIGNAL CABLE 5 COND. #14 AWG LF 600 10680.77 MODIFY TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT LS NEC SIGNAL NO. 83.6 10680.79 REMOVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT LS NEC 680.81 103 PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL SECTION TYPE 1 -12INCH EA 4 680.819105 PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL MODULE, 12 INCH BI-MODAL HAND/MAN EA 4 DATE SCALE DEANO, 680.8142 BRACKET ASSEMBLY, POST TOP MOUNT EA 4 0811109 1"=20' 28104,00-TSP-1 10680.8225 PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON AND SIGN WITHOUT POST EA 2 2 11/30110 REVISED PI 36/10 REVISE_!ER NYSDOT COMMENTS DATED Bd2BNY V.C. OEBIDt3=06Y DRAFTED BY SHEETNO. 1 03/28/10 REVISEOPI SV16 REVIBEDPER NYSDOT COMMENTS DATED 1Z05U V.C. V.C. C.S.o. 5 OF 6 I' i SIGNAL OPERATION SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF SWITCH PACKS SIGNAL NO. 83.6 COUNTY SUFFOLK SWITCH FUNCTION FACE INDICATIONS TERMINAL WIRING BOARD PACK NOS. TERMINAL WIRE COLOR CODE SP1 05 4 R SP 1R 14/19C-1-R/B Y SP 1Y 14/19C-1-OB G SP 1G 14/19C-1-GB GROUND WIRE GROUND BUS 14/19C-1-WB SP 2 SP 2R SP 2Y SP 2G GROUND WIRE GROUND BUS SP 3 02 5,6 R SP 3R 14/19C-1 -R Y SP 3Y 14/19C-1-0 G SP 3G 14/19C-1-G GROUND WIRE GROUND BUS 14/19C-1-W SP 4 SP 411 SP 4Y SP 4G GROUND WIRE GROUND BUS SP 5 03 7,8 R SP 5R 14/19C 1-RIW Y SP 5Y 14/19C-1-BL/W G/-6- SP 5G 14/1 C-1-G/W GROUND WIRE GROUND BUS 14/19C-1-B/W SP 6 04 9,10 R SP 611 14/19C-2-B/R Y SP 6Y 41 - SP 6G GROUND WIRE GROUND BUS SP 7 R SP 7R SP 7Y G SP 7G GROUND WIRE GROUND BUS SP 8 SP SR SP 8Y SP 8G GROUND WIRE GROUND BUS SP 9 SP 9R SP 9Y SP 9G GROUND WIRE GROUND BUS SP 10 06 112 R SP 10R 14119C-2-R Y SP 10Y 14/19C-2-0 G SP 10G 14/19C-2-G GROUND WIRE GROUND BU 14/1 C-2-W SP 11 PED W 12 13 SP 11R 14/5C-1I-R 14/5C-2-R (03) SP 11Y WALK SP 11G 14/5C-9-G 14/5C-2-G GROUND WIRE GROUND BUS- 14/5G1-W 14/5C-2-W SP 12 PED'B' 14 15 DONT WALK SP 12R 1415C3-R 14/5C 4-R (06) S 12Y 14/5C3G 1415C-4-G WALK SP 12G GROUND WIRE GROUND BUS 1415 W 14/5C 4-W SIGNAL OPERATION SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF INPUT WIRING SIGNAL NO. 83.6 COUNTY SUFFOLK FUNCTION DETECTOR NUMBER TYPE TERMINAL BOARD WIRING 01 DET11 PRESENCE LOOP 1A, 1B KEY FOR WIRE COL, TIRE COLOR CODE 02 DET 22 POINT LOOP 2A, 2B 14/19C - 1 - R/B -1-R/B 03 DIET 33 PRESENCE LOOP 3A, 3B XX/ XXC - X- KC - x-x /x DEC - s 2010 I 03 DET 44 PRESENCE LOOP 4A, 4B I AWG NO, OF CABLE NI 06 DET 66 POINT LOOP 5A, 5B COND- FOR THE rFOR LE NO. COLOR TRACER THE OF COLOR UCTORS GIVEN CI EN COND WIR E NYSDOTCASENO.01-099P 05 DET 55 PRESENCE LOOP 6A, 6B UCTOR S OR SIZE 7A, 7B COLOR: B-BLACK BLACK 0-01RANGE DUNN BL-BLUE .-BLUE R-RED ENGINEERING 8A, 8B G-GREEN -GREEN W-WHITE ASSOCIATES, P.C. Consulting Engineers 9A,9B W Mein Street Westhamn 10A, 10B LEGENC LEGEND (831) 88.2480 Such, NV 11078 11A, 11B G=CIRCULAR GREEN Y=CIRCUI Y=CIRCULAR YELLOW R=CIRCULAR RED F = F =LEFT GREEN ARROW 12A. 12B =RIGHT GREEN ARROW T = W T =VERTICAL GREEN ARROW 7-11 MATTITUCK E]=LEFT RED ARROW O O =RIGHT RED ARROW 13A, 13B ® =LEFT YELLOW ARROW IW © =RIGHT YELLOW ARROW 14A. 14B REVISIONS MICROCOMPUTER SIGNAL 15A, 15B NO. DATE DATE DESCRIPTION BY OPERATIONS SPECIFICATIONS SIGNAL NO. 83.6 03 301,302 PED.BUTTON 16A,16B DATE SCALE DEANO, 08111109 NONE 281KOD-TSP•2 2 11130H0 AWISE 11/90/10 REVISED PER NYSDOT COMMENTS DATED ON]B/10 V,C. DESIGNED BY DRAFTED BY SHEET NO. 1 08172/10 BHEEI 0snnn0 SHEETAOOEOPERNYSOOTIP/W/WCOMMEN~S V.C. V.C. C.S.D. 6 OF 8 i W20-1 -4t, G20-2a M / BARRELS Q 20' •PPPAIP 1129106 / O.C. (TYP.) / :o ~ A d Enn, p1E srom • / ~ ~ nnf. (W iwrry n. ME nam / BRIM NUEEENO (W nATM) r•~% NICK .OEiNO W NAT" ~ • • 5 aaw.sn z.. mx~s~Eawr emn nv mxvdsvwr a.~.r I 4 - Mv. r.,.,xx IRA BIG (IEE CPEVI) U • rnix'nEm rxo c«rvm~ A$ -rl prn W21.5e W20.1 RAND a, w ~ S_HOPPING CENTEp Ww IM.,i.'ao SHOPPING CENTER G20-2s EB ..,,E \w.R, 200, 300' AIN ROAD (S.I )AD_ (S.R. 25) - , F 200' W20-1 BARRELS (x130' O.C. (fYP.) G20-2a Li W20-1 ~v SHOULDER CLOSURE SCHEME NOTES: Q IiLU '1B mr 1. WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL SCHEMES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL LE DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D.) WITH NEW YORK STATE SUPPLEMENT, THE APPROVED PLANS AND A.O.B.E. LEGEND 2. THE CONTRACTOR MAY SUBMIT REVISIONS TO THIS PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION SIGN II DEC - 6 2010 _ 3. THE TRAFFIC MAINTENANCE SCHEMES INCLUDED IN THE PLANS DESCRIBE RECOMMENDED METHODS AND CONTROL DEVICES NECESSARY. THE ENGINEER MAY ORDER ADDITIONAL DEVICES AND/OR METHODS TO MEET FIELD CONDITIONS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR'S ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO SECTION 6F.02 OF THE M.U.T.C.D. WHICH REQUIRES THAT WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE • TRAFFIC CONE RAILROAD ADVANCE WARNING SIGN, WARNING SIGNS USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH WORK ZONE ACTIVITIES SHOULD HAVE ORANGE BACKGROUNDS. A BARREL NYSDOT CASE NO. 01-099P 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FLAGGERS WHERE SIGHT DISTANCES ARE IMPAIRED BY HIS OPERATION OR A.O.B.E. NOTE: 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WORK ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROADWAY IN THE SAME AREA AT THE SAME TIME. I TYPE III BARRICADE DUNN SEE SHEET 8 OF 8 FOR INTERSECTION 7. ALL PROVISIONS OF ITEM 619.01 - BASIC MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC, AND ITEM 619.0101 - BASIC MAINTENANCE AND CONTROL AND LANE SHIFT SCHEMES PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC (DAILY OPERATIONS) SHALL APPLY. ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C. 8. TRAFFIC SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON A PAVED SURFACE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. TRAVEL LANES ON ALL ROADWAYS SHALL BE A FLAGGER Consulting Engineers MINIMUM OF 11' WIDE AND TURN LANES A MINIMUM OF 10' WIDE, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE PLANS), 88 Main Street 9. TAPER SHALL SEAS PER M.U.T.C.D. TABLE 60-2 FOR THE POSTED LIMIT. Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 TRAFFIC FLOW (831) 288.2480 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PARK HIS EQUIPMENT OR STORE MATERIAL OVERNIGHT WHERE IT IS DEEMED BY THE ENGINEER TO BE SAFETY HAZARD TO TRAFFIC. WORK AREA 11. THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED THAT NO PAVEMENT EDGE DROP-OFFS WILL BE PERMITTED WITHIN TEN (10) FEET OF THE TRAVEL LANES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE HIS OPERATIONS SO THAT ALL EXCAVATED WORK AREAS SHALL BE BACKFILLED TO GRADE AT CONCLUSION OF THE WORK DAY, OR APPROPRIATE MPT MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED OVERNIGHT A.O.B.E. 7-11 MA171TUCK 12. THE BOTTOM OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGNS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5'-0" ABOVE THE SURFACE AND A MINIMUM OF 2'-0" CLEAR OF THE TRAVEL LANE OR AS ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER. 13. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY DROP-OFF EXISTS ADJACENT TO THE TRAVEL LANE. THE CONTRACTOR IS NOT TO EXCAVATE THE SHOULDER AREA UNTIL THEY ARE PREPARED TO COMPLETE THE PROPOSED WORK. IN THE EVENT OF NO. DATE REVISIONS CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND THE CONTRACTOR'S CONTROL, SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO, STRIKES, ADVERSE WEATHER ETC., SUCH DROP-OFF ATE DESCRIPTION aY MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION SHALL BE ELIMINATED BY OR AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR AT THE END OF THE FORTY-EIGHTH HOUR AFTER THE LAST TIME THE OF TRAFFIC PLAN - 1 WORKFORCE ACTIVELY PURSUED CONSTRUCTION IN THE DROP-OFF AREA. NO DROP-OFF GREATER THAN 61NCHES IS TO REMAIN OVERA WEEKEND OR A HOLIDAY. A DROP-OFF IS CONSIDERED ELIMINATED IF TAPERED AWAY BY A ION 4 SLOPE OR FLATTER. DATE SCALE DEA NO. 14. NO LANE CLOSINGS ARE PERMITTED ON WEEKENDS, HOLIDAYS OR DURING NON-DAYLIGHT HOURS. THE CLOSING OF ONE LANE WILL BE PERMITTED ON WEEKDAYS, BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 10:00 AM AND 3:00 PM. NIGHTTIME LANE CLOSINGS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHOUT 08/11/09 1"=30' 28104.00-MPT-1 PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE STATE PERMIT INSPECTOR. IGNED BY DRWTEO BY SHEET NO. I aM10 REVIM TEND REVISED PERNYSDOTCOMMENTS DATED 12MO A.G. DES A.G. C.S.D. 7 OF 8 III I 1 n-NR. o- ROAD nyll. Olp AIDE ¦-e$a RAMI T woRK P.® AHEAD w•°.a ao-E ROAD mm TMLE M. d Ta n WYRdFIIi ro na WTm •ooi FM YETAM' A K¦ASOT ' NOA ~O5° AFEO v s IDUOEal 10CM RERFIEKf TO TIE IVIa QOSFD ALLIDRa WIM M 3S M.w ClAOFD DEER xdE ¦ .r. _MTSM Mm 3!; ItlTE tl MN M-5ar DY¦dl Mill-A RIST¦ Mw FoSiEOU® LIII ~H IIH NTOFM L 1051EO SRM lMT a a5 INN 4 1¦EdR i i i i ~ R¦Lml ~ Dmm TNAVEL LANE "MS1E0 R® L'dT a mosu m mmE 2i <r NRA ¦ IN ' ..,IA _ _ ._7` - ¦ ¦ - - - fir= - - -lei - - - TRAVEL. LAME ~i "dim L?1T a DY"Fl w Im L IN ¦ ' ¦ - - - - - - ram LAw ~ ~ ¦ - AAA- TIINDW LNE ¦ ¦ MUM LANE ~P ¦ • - - - - ¦ ¦ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ¦ ¦ RRam ¦ ' F IN Aff T1 F F F F F E F F L Ln 1WUNER L Irl¦ XnE LAIsR ALDEII Pn ® IN Ln sanw IW.Gm A TAM AAA USA Nra-n \ TAPER FFAM ¦M O Fa L ARID XDIE 6 aD LM iAS °inl E `n. TAKE NYI-10 PUFRD SD) ¦R-31 ¦W31 TM aiE rM1E rru r RILEIFTR INSTANCE ~ r M,~,T L¢E TAKE Dri-D u~ ..ew No,Ao nonrc na IDm lal a•T ¦D-E READ END Sow THE AHEAD 1-Al WORK ao-z N 11 lo~.n AHEAD 1-iL ¦PI 35 10 SOME NOTE R SOE LATE SHIFT 35 AV SHORT INTERMEDIATE TEN STATIONARY 2-LANE 2-WAY RWAYWITH CENTER TIM LANE xoTE D SINGLE LAKE SHIFT SHORT W-nROADWAY ~WAY WITH TERM COW TURN LA IOIIARY W TO SOME) 2-L E ROT ro sSALET DAM LATE Mm. SSE STA¦AOO SHEET 17END OF ZM TRAFFIC /M LETTER aEi ~o i D ¦ TUNIS DRAM OF 511!0.S 5 A¦/a ~ NOTE, SEE STMOMD SHEET Tl= -M ZOM TNMFIC cu T LEa005 MM NOIFS• FOR LEGEND ¦ ST S MO/a LETiM CODES USED M TINS mom mDS, 39 1. q qO Amnm. W% rLa STORAGE OF 1ENDIM OR a1ENU LWl amt Nm011 L sPoLLO WEN: 11NwIam ro sNa Maim ljMd LM ISM Np M Ea'.A SE IM 1 WU1T .1, 1 REVERSE d1amElea10 STATE OF NEW YORK IgDs STATE OF NEW YOU TE WlFw ~Aa W NIr TN OOflli r smr NE Yrx 9101LD ¦ am TOR 1a MONGER A EGT1a Ts L00F11 MM ear. l sEr a ¦FENE 001E MMO - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION O ~faNIL L a Uluc aY1R YXING CEP IEN TO mREIN ME. HOT DMES a W BE AM r VON Y•OINmm 6•WlmlM ME m WK ~ a•OM-IU 6EF XOE O fe¦ SrACL SNOLLO NE 01N NmERO a TE FI6r REVERSE MYE 1a ¦l- AID r¦ SEM E DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 35 I. AIIfFEII s Airy a IMAGE IF VMES, ON MATERIAL RULL OCCUR ARM c IIEIE TIE SNFRD SEP a ONGER ma l J ILL CIRT4a1T STANDARD SHEET 1T I SX¦ 1¦ ¦iI1W m 1¦ IDIDIC D¦1EMf. NOD THE TNIIRL 5107 MO A SE000 SET 9M5? ¦ OFD 10 L TIAI61daE pE N0 NE N~pgap OS TER fl! lrNpMO SaLOQ,L}¦a WEx A ` n11E SIfN mill w wE ¦ dNrim. I' OFF MDa 11 L pA~~D ¦YDE SPACED RIUEI m aKIFA RWL IDT EIDfEO i7 M TIE ALTIIE AIE ~ryDRI¦ -ILEI U. MTOYMr STMOMO SHEET 6 Lf5Y 1N1NISTkm O~0EL~E TgeFA,q q~OSE MMSOTNIEM4SEAM fw6iM M mt;E MEISE SIOI eA-ILI PAVED 9101EOE~ I`LLSrm NWF I' a NREAIEII 6 4aFp is A OLSIYAE aG1D1 7. WEN rASIN1ID 9gI1.OFN! XA" L NmN a Y aMYE Ya 6am, a/1EE11ll10 15m', dmES i1 ¦ O1D ro CLOSE is d SAW THAN W AaANm ro dLNGIE THE SINGLE LANE SHIFT Y ~ ~ ~a L~ A~ 1 TDAXSYDRE ¦16F$ ¦ALL OE AEWEEO 0 FEIN ill STA¦MI 4EmIa1D161 IIER A ¦YFHE L Da ZO SRDRO ¦ (MITT AM SI¦LOFA MAmD A PRIM W E OR DELTA a MORE M A MA CE or 1. EP=A RAWD A MTN OF 1' WHO SNMFM ¦ a¦TTFN dOORM' OF THE m PACE AND 70 ODEti VDwLAI~ rAAPTa 10 alMd W TE 2-LANE 2-WAY ROADWAY WITH 11M Ism. E RWL E IRO RA YOM TIE SHUD CENTER TURN LANE Fa LED DIRATmII LIFE aa1L~5, lERaal rA1E1FNlf KWAOIS aA1 ¦ aEO IN IDAVEm MITRE Gas 9•ATE A¦ m ODECr '"Aft a MT' a r ¦ NODE ME a aMeMlme SINGLE LANE SHIFT M ~1¢°EVM m m~ IvwF 1NV?tm Ia~LMDI T1E 2-LANE 2-WAY ROADWAY WITH I. Fa Lac d70Tar1 ax u' OOSOWS lWmTEIarM M¦¦Arr0E1m11 mmVNA¦Dm NI.W ¦nur ME IEEO d FUMED WAY. rnYlmdMOOMIIDEo TN ON I¦LEAnsNN !I wW BE REMOVED 'rN a L 1¦ ENGINEER APT ¦WOE nW TEf a M AOYaaI erWm M1AOa mz-u ro Eoemm. Ar;RlOaa m TIE taRIMCf CODIEXfx MR Da1Dli rASETEITf IYIEaa DaT ARR CENTER TURN LANE SarLF¦Nr A WWIOi 1IX TE RAOIE N01 YE INF01 m OOIa1 W MTSOIY S. FOR NAD¦N WxmE ME ¦ 1. rA¦IS W14 AND xTt-A a THE !r¦0W WA is r` fe¦ TOE m¦mal a. mew Lam, dYS, Na MMNNr 5¦Er TNm •wa ZONE 1NIEFY mNIaL IECDw NO NOIEY. ATFILb La a NO 9wAall aa-aEL aaElw WadAdlS. Awla Ma 10R cRELRTDD a IeaLWac ¦AU ¦ AFM1ID a COSEIIm. AMMLFR SEPID¦ 11. Eat 1551E0 d p-at c R"'PKFaA GAINED MY RVARRE ON USE OF AN AD ME THE DE OF M uov6ae STEED FLME M3_11 TG MITINIL W E EAT /5/ Map) A. moon FE c fa IM¦111FII~f OF RE TALES ¦14 AID ¦E-A a THE SCAMDA¦ SFE¦ LIME la[ OSE AM OLi1D La a w swum aa~DFF; GO 9M NE FL/ME TOLL eE I® TO RMCATE M wrOaNf SEPTam III FOa O FE ¦-0N mE aaMDIMI OD. xMe1¦ I%EM Foa eaJ¦Ar NM105, aIOFOMS, Rtlkll00 W61MNI5, Mp/pl1 r0a SMD MYO J. MEOWS, FE 619-63 EFFECTIVE DA TIX 619-63 REST TRIM -M ONE' a m¦OL IEgm xD NNW. SIR, Dj rmlT EFFECII9E DA76 OI/i¦/09 pD StlETT~xWD EaAm EFFEC;; DATE, 01/00/05 M¦nm ISLE EC-S ON TABLE WI-A TABLE GH FMWJS FOR KIM= TAPER LENGTHS TABLE EC-S USE &O N TEEIA o OMIA77E ~ AND SOg~T TUN STATIMARY aOVISM T? LEa,N V TAPER I IC CONTROL 21 ONES MIH Fwl 7EIWOINAIW CONIIDL ZdES L . raER OF O` 44 uN ¦w a Lflf L-052,44 USE ¦WwwlrS i : o"nWm¢nOFFSET rm06Aim srEm LWa Yl0 u L QaaE TYPE DNIOSANE LOOTwI WY AIAIRIWN re1EN READ LNEO Of"a MORE LA RS NM l- w FRMUY STANDARD TAPER LENGTHS arm TAPER vs tN Inl A-10INN t 1INN a 1AAiFEW'•i lpY¦MY IRAPTC NIIIIOL E01E i9nm SRm LaT OROar¦w TYfIIT dAPFlC TAPER ICE iT.N la TAEX 1¦ rt. AWaIY WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL LEGEND la R. IRE LIFE m INM W w 1WO IM ¦w M 1Y¦ ERN Vw w INW m ¦lo NE Iwo TN IYIO dais m'o A[WOLV ¦WN¦N! ¦CDwT a11ONLE LO PAN SDla OFSW9¦I Te dAPFle f M M ¦ of Iw Zm uY za NiO E¦ LANE RaDE NON-11N OL OWLE Q MIW"a nw r ¦ E¦Y5 ¦OwDI ¦¦¦EOE ar ¦wE aT a lz c rgS w is i¦ n z°0oo m w m a`0o DOAYATM Or1.T ¦ fWWEl6 E¦01O r 15 la IM ¦ ]m !M ]M !tp RM 1¦ NowEM ON Ear ON N n Iza Iw :L! OEO fOD eee elp no !LO Q EAIOI PAIFI. MM NONE m Von=DOTA00 AE00¦DT aEwaT almLEZ OPTOIAI.E ! ¦ la_ IN 20 f¦ fW 415 SIN NM m MNFASER amAE 10 ¢ Io 1O5 la to iM Nw sm Sim Em TlA im MNFiM NI Aa AS rim II INS I An SW LNS EEn 115 Tio ITS a. [ppNpT. W1ENmE, REMARKS a•rauL= aTlaAt allpm 21 Its 1w tw m Sw ANO No lpl 701 Ew ExMrAtmE nAr H auwvaElE wsra sw arm W WWW Dow • aaEEl.vao amE _611.1 WU amwvlnaxn MAC? ATmwm 1. THE EXPOSURE f11p11M6 p5n®p THE NI'1M Asmas ip1E p NN POSITIVE PIRIWINI DEC-62010 EATI® MIW11AN1'°EpaMF SIrtAIE Irm iEpmEn. a xuuos xE nronsao IV A iFrouNr RARE RATES FABLE OR EI?O51 tYE EARIff]t FOSIIIVE EAM611 V om mw r tErwm 1aAmC al•11 z :%T W WWMEImT a ;W=A SAlpll 4AFAE a THE STAaNp IdpMSa TABLE 6C-2 roSiEO Mm pFFa SATE rtASIE fC-N LO161IIAOIL BOFER SPACE THE OF POSITIVE ANUEII m w W aSlEO r® l?01 m a a ss os W owslwo r a•Ttc ~ i , LEA 1/11 LEN I IEa°flEINS MALL nRwE Mmmp A SEPARATE SUMMER VEHICLE Fm EAa aN4p NNE rx Iw Iw rE 1 IIp FNT 6645 M~K1M~91mEM E' a pFATFR p SMM Fla ppA XKE aES rma SPEEDIWiluo NIST emu MRH 1 1 1 r• FllArll IXIWEAS imIFLIGE aN-7 ES°1A6ME~NAiMS~IL p llAa~pMl°°aE0N1°iV11~ Sarpo Alp IpM-SOami Xap5 lNl6 la XATNp a LaQll FAptt EALEr1M1p in laa TABLE 141611.3 luc IrE aFlpa W1ENIaaFWI°LI2OFlIf°aap E Sk}F~ECM°~E a M0°ECI° n AF?E aM MSIiE CFFMTm a lMFFl6 ADMMCE BARIUM SMN SPACING 1 SIGN SNAI SPACING Lu•u~ NYSDOT CASE NO. 01-099P 4. IIARAEp EM E~E'F'AR 9 ACE REMAIN N 9.1SMM1 PAM OPERAMRS, MIT Ta STAMM row m MITaa a/aa NMI; Sim O A FTJ I FT.) C FTJ W 61 L WRMWER IFER SrAMRA1IMEEMWrli MIN BE RAMIN pppilpR M THE STNpNp Lpl°IIIppIL pFa p MM IN 100 Im " rr mm aXA weTMiLTrIrM"E1w aar UK turw[n DUNN MpM ~'NO ISIM m 20o toD AWM UMW 1! n pIM sm "'I SSO mN FT AIEIa o LE TABLE NV2-A IESIp. 5W SIX) m Sinn ENGINEERING PLACENENT DISTANCE FOR BARBER VMES DaEaF r A FWEFAr Imo ISM tEw 1 1EE wE wILEw 077)ASSOCIATES, P.C. }}AA~RL NN'y/ • IIEEa61M¢Ta MSTm MEm LAAf ORSTAKE f ® lfla•r1Y Nwmi m Van LRNfS Consulting Engineers V= M a WI W F aFp IN I APE r lXA0R11 YOIftLLEIAEI SOlOE1R1 S ®a° oL 88 Mein Btmet WARAW mAxAmmm RATREE 0. 1 MA > m 1m FT. Lm Fr. IN FT. 26J FL ~'E FAT O III m A" m 11 F IV, 0- Hume a rtaErw A Fo'oi m m me m wwCre Westhampton Ranch, NY 11078 USE RANDOM - m m FT. Boo iT. II In FT. Cpp A°% Waap6IE~7 MSE rma ~6 • IS A. In Fi. w R. Im Fi. AFENS Mon ~W $ weNlo Llan (831) 288.2480 AaiIEEMT MM AW AWA aT EmmRp M TNW aE aTEI aaNAE TYPE ENMMR mama iWEEAT FamanECf MEm uAn . u pFOEO p xrs°or STAaMp SWEFmTm ur• aMMlElaips ttw ON OF M Ag1E aw rACE !n ATM N W pN a LANKA WHICLE .I.AK MORVISULE IMET,, AM)°OTHE niTERAT m E° p EaEMmopro ~ T E1p~Cp wmT M ~e..y'MlAlic- ~•.~~.''~~~y AT WJa ammoMs N ® w• rxnE Ial1E MOMS LAW a°MEE .VMy m ATKA NATNp ANUdA KUGEA WWWEOM o6TAM°F61WM Y AtiAtI TIE ICTNL AaL MEIA FAEMATSANORSTAM Lax a Ur IlmalAl. 1 a p564FpNpF1AA,FAFp NnFFMLME fLCLIIES FpN IIW a rM11Y. mpl¢L a IAp 1 KMWA ONEm. ® wt VEtoo4E RIN 1•la ImNlm ATmWitll 1r11Y. twr0.r~ r ILfIS, 7-11 MATTITUCK MIOLLaII ao51M p apOropEA HAEAW WppEd'N ANNUM WWpml TABLE 1112-11 PLACEMM OSTAICE FOR SHADDR MILES A ABLE aCMpE WALL a WED ra AW aW Mpy[ry iMT Ip4E [afap6LY a pIFlYllpMr llEmFipClm Pimm" Fri ROIK DIRIAT1IM DEFIIDTIIXS EFMff= KOO THE TMYELM WY wy M~p~a~Na SLOW MIA TE "NE SPIN a IAIAFIC aM1El®Ip LIIEi nmp IffiE °pMl T= aM TWi pNFS A Laulal m pYfaS AW Nor usm Fa VIR SUEx L 91IAM lflN1lE! aKl W EYRI40 ~Sm W XaM A MM ww m STATE OF NEW YORK y AriAEMp REAR MOM ATRImTa TTAM mMm > 55 , t15 rL U STATmARYY IS ATM TUT OMM A Laa a TRA M WtHIEM Fa Ta MARK aME MOMES LAM: amIES a FWEFAMMILAMEECLMO . M° rL MIGHTME ~ ~ 1~ 1 IMIL E MT omm A LwArw DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REVISIONS 1m6 NaEa AFREFA°A15S,AYO SNMtpll Q a X6Ff 0WEIIr afal 111 NapN° IIE-ml6ap M <A5 1°° FT. ANEMIA o COwatNE aIS a NO. WE us. CUSOruaT mAwAw seEr TE DESCRIPTION aY MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION SIEFN U°T a NS MN a j aaF1El , STATmwAW- 15 DAYTIME TAW TUT pbFFE A La w nut ooaaFS A Lauimo E attwr RIOm, • a pmEN IN ama STAWAW W=ATm 61% IN mE TAW I mm A SMILE AAXWrt FENNa x rSI1 Ilmad LAME SOMAS a WNfWEUAr mgATA MrSp A rW' RTTloll rartp STEW LMT a a Mp a LESS Np Awl MgAall I M YS MOS um A i REAR plCllNll ~i1016 IflMaF I® FOR Ip1AE OR dart RUM MmT r T I MS aaFEE A MCIIWI W a 1 N a A LAlww r m t OR NONI ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL OF TRAFFIC - 2 ~YLM} a w WN a LESS. SNIA°11 flHmFS MK E Nor WaM ED " BE Ip a E4pWA pM A A WM WpEp M WSEE 3 p WRA ESE TUT WES MIEMAfmllr a mpNWST. any a Ewlmaw.L LEGENDS AND NOTES L A mMa110.Jr a M M rm1ECi ENM4n MprM M I= a E A IflMtEI AN Will a Ka =51"=20"m TE ACMA A WEM Il1aE a69Wx S1UOa alll¢E IEpppplS 9a1 MSmE Mmnlpp A M/MAIE 9a°m DATE ecnin DEAND. MINO aIF E6 WI E°AFaEEpMp mpl~°TEASEOME O ImE•6 TMFFIC~Mp NNNFAYINAL a-ao AEroaLm "'I IssAV raEll a 08111/09 NONE 28104.00-MPT-2 IIMRLRm a rnam EaAMS. n AparFO W la W01oWL SmCIa a NTSIIm OFSItlEF. mum , A. mulmm AL 614-11 EFFECTIVE DAT EFFECTIVE DATFa 01/a/O! olk yAEn NrD Im.ln. 13UIGNEOBY ORAFTEDBY SHEET NO, p t outrta ffSHEETADI via SHEETADDEO PER NYSOOT 12/01100 COMMENTS A.O. NYSDOT NYSDOT 8 OF II u .Y / hO TO 19.35 1'.77 aw-0lD46.00 % )CATION V p`n~ N 48°57'30" E SIC a. 7 EXIST' ^m ' TRASH PROP.5 CU. T0. TRASH 6g76 x,6.5D SITE LOCATI rv $ GRATE ROPOSED 11• HIGH SECURITY sHxDED AREA INDICATES PROP. p CHAIN LINK FENCE OWE TO BE RILED IN ENCLOS200' ' X 1. W ON 0 E'L2~ CaN~; 3,6 CONTAINER (TYP.) s CU. TO. TRASH SEPTIC TANK INER (TYP.) '114 y1Iv) n 41 tll ~II -1""r` KEMPEY ENGINEERING flOP. 1b00 COMPACT Pill. MATERIAL, EL 24.39 R. 23.90 134 GPD x 2 DAYS = 268 GALLONS d6,~d-til~rldGl~l, r~l, I11PG2%la1r~ i , III II' ED S' HIGH SEDIIRITI' 111"~I 1 i1 II~ IM P IR J L~,1, . GALLON GREASE MAP TO 95% MAX. DENS". I PROP. BOLLARD ROPOSED S' HIGH SEWS" / !n0lOSm O O (e• 01 s• ) (Ty - CHAIN LINK FENCE T-31 GUARDRAIL MATH WSxB.S FY INK ME WITH W6xB.S PROVIDED: (1) 1200 GAL. SEPTIC TANK (8' DIAM. 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY u NOT X POST? E1VEqR9V V-3• D.C. IJ'I, ( 1111 f 7 ' Y t~ r .i TRY V-3. D.C. SEWER LED. _ 1892 ME1ER MFIEfX TC L9'.91D (n x 4' LIQUID DEPTH) lEyld, I tv„ LI -P-0 I r+PP ~`~1f IIF J Iv I li ~ ' 1 WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 qMl'. e' Oll x All 22. r m IrAUUx0 .P. BC 2 .40 ~dl I I~ lI YJII~~ r~i 11 i1JI I,' I I I~ . , 1 li I )I~~I b (~x a P III -co. To R PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SF L L TO 24.90 9' 1~II a-k.T(1 ~I fr I r M mlq ym III, i4aa GREASE TRAP ~„r , 14y11'N ,=v ~ II 1 d,,~ JI p I, I ' P: 631.321.7777 O1°W"e TO ( (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA- 2275 S.F.) / BC 24,40 Mil 2 A WTx J lMnW Oo PROP. STALKED .E W~ (K~A 500 XH.. JAIM..W c V ~ r 23 i / /RETAINING WALL SEE F: 631.661.0486 P. ST w~ SEE 54 GPD x 1 DAY = 54 GALLONS MIN. REQ'D. 16 {I° ar tifilm r` ~r 1.9 y1 ,1i l ~7T vJi~~ „ II ' NNING .ONSP-3 x .1 ill~l l>I~F.il oy ~i tlJii~Irl li I~"(I,I~i4i'' " •Xxx FMC MAN INAVI I - - - - - 7' ~W 1yry~_ -W DET. ON SP-3 %1B X30 0 PL~ M y --I-- T~ApIPSG/A~ I SHADED AREA INDICATES OED AREA INDIGrSe say xtoas PROVIDED: 1500 GAL. GREASE TRAP 8' III; I { II HC'Ii t J7 N~I,p li~y^I2' r ip r~ ' ,.v.; 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE I, POP. 120D / \ ( T R GRADE TO BE RLLED IN. DE TO BE RU"O IN. (1) ( rr ),I 4f1 f I f 7 , mllll;l x A II IPACT Ra ATERIa DIAM. x 5' LIQUID DEPTH MIN. REQUIRED) Y-•~ `0 y / O TANK SEPTIC A COMPACT RLL MATERIAL GAL l8~ 6~ FlXOIXGm / I / I \ \ } LIT r0 93x MAIL 005". 95x NAIL. 005". fAe rJ Ny P i 1 II { r 4~, lh0(i l Il4 ~i hall ,q It 12 y l I, f l EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 (V/~OVn~tR 9Q04ti s~~F a~-Tih aaE J / / rnPUnuNleo (I "rl L1u T ir6 tj Pil(i ( ( x MOUNTE ~S1a`eoV~G 25~ o~g /PRb CARS RS ONLY COMPACT IS ONLY (QW (att.. a41~ n I1 1 MP Y li tl ~ ~IQI I lei ~ Yf1 11 1T qll 1 f• IS 3I he LEACHING POOL Xh illrppl IIA,r , .III + ~Il 1~ ' P. 631.368.3324 D ADDITION 'E:6'e. 1 n (Ott. EX T. COVE •I i1Dl SuGe~~~'Ro5 Bc 2ze E61 14 685 SF. PR POSE A S P H A I P H ec~018NN es. j"~~IE'1~4~~I,~II . niillr II >M(II 1~Nh~' l~T°'ipn <r T I (22.136 134 GPD / 1.5 GAL/DAY/SF = 89.3 SF IL~I'" II Ivh4 V y~j)q oo{ P rll I I,,, (u 6 a\th a ITV ~~IIW19~"I~I IIp.:. hula F. 631.368.1524 I$ ~ xG Y iPOaro u10 /.LL / B' 0. LP. t0Y ~.1I1°A© }}IV~I,~yY. ©~~ti. 0%l $©NtO (i1 ~91q AL1V511f;~ ~~114y 14 II ~n.ill;i PEPS PII'~IlliyhG d~~~fi P rv N($CIMu~,;q " ; CQCIVp~ s0%11.. DIJ VN AL EXISTING: (2) 8' DIAM. x 7' EFFECTIVE DEPTH LEACHING 1., BIB . t x i111g~m11Y~ ;;Ih REVISIONS: C 24.36 4 4 C 4 RD 'ATM' Ll.4P,,i N e tltl\111WALVSp 24. 4 C 24. 4 WIN OW SIG I TO 24.74 C P~~ry' LED AS POOLS lip ~27ET Ej' 11NTR GW RL`R 055 ACCESS IF flR_-- 8 yrv Q rv NY5R4 Q BC 24.24 RE Date Description No. v~ QO TZ4~23500 SxW - / n EXI$SIMG'"fYETAINING a TIN AINING WALL TO BE PROTECTED EXIST. POOLS PROVIDE 25.13 SF/VF X 14 VF= 352 SF 2 KEY MAP TRING CONSTRUCTION. > 300 SF MIN. REQUIREMENT UMP IS NO --0JRING CONSTRUCT 0~ b \ TO B REMO ,J T-31 GLARD IL WTH N -SSS A POST EVERt• W-3. O.f r-31 GIIMDMtL WTH Weller SP-1 =DST III II D.C. %le.eo 8/06/09 SUBMITTAL TO SCDHS 4Q 3y °i BC 24.25 \ BC 23.50 DENSITY: Fu P OP. T.O.G. PROP. "7-11" WOOD CARVED 5/7/10 SUBMITTAL TO SCDHS B~9 $ c TO 2 .75 IN ET WALL SIGN W/ GOOSENECK / PRO OSED 1' OIAM BC 24.25 E . 22.75 LIGHTING /`10. e X COP \ER WATER SEI i0 OSED 1' DIAM. SCHEDULE K 600 GPD/ACRE x 0.55 ACRES = 330 GPD > 134 GPD ]P \ER WATER SERVICE 6/25/10 SUBMITTAL TO SCDHS - y • _F- / Xe'0. L.P. " 111 PROPOSER LO( `PROP05E0 LOGTION 7/01/10 SUBMITTAL TOSCDF C ) ~ 3~} ~ BC 24.5 EXIST. J\1 OLOBI OF FUTURE cR 0 G E I l10' Y P7 QQ Q EL e' D. x P PROP. T.O.~G. ~ ACCESS TO M C 23.25 PRDI OF FUNRE LRO55 ACCESS TO AOJACEM _ N' EM! III W GAB P REMOVE 0 INLET EL. 22.50 C 22,75 n PROPERLY ~ / TC 20.02 6 1 TO BE flEMVEO @ R 20. / 146.00 3 LIST OF DRAWINGS: 1 OJ 51GNAOE; EMPLOYEE \ EXIST. GUARDRAIL TO BE REM PARKING ONLY OTT. ]1 ® TC 23.25 IUM 48'57'30" E T a .DD DRNL TO BE REMOVED N NN PROF. M NYYg1 lROIOIfD STAC N.m •l ~Sm O~ ISBN T•G 25 20 TD "4. 0 B(. 22.75 \5PXRAT pET.PON PKEO RETPINING WI TC 20.40 TALKED RUNNING WALL SEE ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ BC 24 70 BC 13 90 SP-3 / J Sheet Description 777 HD-1 KEY MAP BC 23.0 PROPO Ar I BC 23.00 25.98 '2N SOFf. CSCAREN u 9wx n„ FOR mNIE MRMNG u BW 'zb'.~`§ BW 36 TLV 20..19 rx KISED 7On1 NURNO NCO 21 BE - 09 6W 1 B 70 ,p/ ~ t o (CONVENIENCE MME nRPA. 2275 S.F.) / RADIUS e~j T~f WPROHIIFMS 25,55 _ ryH 25, 12~04 1( iii 11528,25 i 4 -SITE PLAN ~i SANITARY CALCULATIONS uN X+2573-- . f f L2432 F'T R60]04IRER ORDISD AID RATCHSro M 24.04 CROSSWALK EARTNO WRe CYT T11 IS 48 57 30 W f 198.00 RAl~L '47 % SEPO9f0 22'50 GINO MARKER x }>1V CH MONO Sf5 N 24.20 OTE M 2 %Rr N. % 22.51 cH MN / 9E1C• L W Tc 2111 t• fff~~~ Vv / ' SANITARY DETAILS 16.29 BC 26.85% N 25 6 MAW. xOcrocx Xd Ols 22.81 MILE MMKER oSON'FNI0.VICE 25 0704 1520 DEMOLITIdN SITE PLAN % % 1. 2 TC 22. RN4m0 ~'Ni8' axRALY ~ CMsswuX r4 25.10 X %IST. 51 N M~ COV P W: T 'FNI0.VICF -10• X MORNING RAMMED ENISL UP]44 Elm ,BO NYTO44 Is S 2 0 %ST. SI N MMa U 25 07M IS . SO 2 95 IMM.57 25. R O S S W L $19] WIn[ uNllES • M 20.82 21.14 WK WM D6GWDON FOR BC 24.60 TO 2 07 21.14 20,51 - ~-I- i DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL: PI TLRNIND w NO ENTRY t x I LNE B 2385 22.92 RAaus IMPROYFfNS C ®BC 2043 ' my (d I ` ` _ S N, un uFr rvnx• d aq TPE WHI LINE 2 ,pg .57 r0 PUBMC - R W~ WA1ER MAIN I O L1 0 2.29 - SHOULDER OD _ I I E%U r. EL TANK S e y % n MHIIE LLNE I .I I (WIDTH VARIES) R l 1 ~T n / \ m4[~WIHMII'x14 FUEL TANKS IMI AI -5• rv a 2 is a 24.96- ,-R y f"T y `S. CLOSED SON 6 m, TO BE REMOV w O I GAS PUMP ISLAND REMOV u 28.92 ac „ r-- R. 25/ Yxo . e• wmE FACH ?5 h 3. TO BE REMOVED 2 a A r~- 1 SITE PLAN ~T CO CRE P D+ EJ EEe P-1 SCALE: 1' =20T-0" ALL BI A SORUEV 1 111 SITE INFORMATION IS BASED UPON A SURVEY DATED 02/15/06, JOB NO. 06013, BT IF VOLCMUTH B ~B/1FN NOTES: * vo, FIF v u~o wie Fary~sxo vvan,, x 8'57'30" W 1. THERE ARE NO SURFACE WATERS WITHIN 300' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. u,u, v=nm..nN,w..m , xrN. 2. THERE ARE NO WATER SUPPLY WELLS WITHIN ]50' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. xo Bmnv Suffolk County Department of Health Services wxK --u :1Q A DL(S.R. 25) Approval for Construction - other Than Single Family «re,.re DATUM: USGS- NGVD 1929 Reference No- C, 10 •-02 -FY=1h -7 Design Flow 3/ 2 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN use(s)_ ~'-Il ~ryi ant,..,„-~ Fl i b? it ~ These plans have been reviewed for general confin anc with Suffolk LEGEND SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONIS Canty Department of Health Services stantisrds, relating to water supply TIC = TOP OF CURB AREA AREA DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN TC TOTAL SCALE: 1/32" = 11-0" and sewage disposal. Regardless, ofany omission, incmnsisamces or lack FLOW BY - ~ - - - of detail, construction is rquircd to be in accoMarce with the attached BT = BOTTOM OF CURB FLOW FLOW FLOW FL Permit conditions, and applicable arcrldaNS wless specifically waived by SPACE: ~ ^ I - 24V ~ 24.05 the Deltatotem. This approval expires 3 yearn from the of data X utdRa.exrcrldedorrcnewed. ~J EL = ELEVATION NAME SIZE SANITARY: GREY: TOTAL: SF i r ¦ = MONUMENT Sf 134 gdp / provdque view = DRAINAGE FLOW CONVENIENCE 2,670 0.03 gpd/sf 0.02 gpd/sf 0.05 gpd sf 1 STORE SF =80 gdp =54 gdp =134 gdp / PROP. 1500 = UTILITY POLE GAL. TRAFFIC BEARING GREASE TRAP REASE TRAP ENGINEER'S GERTIF1M11A1101 Bk3,. 23.90 O O X 24.68 (8' DIAM, 5' LIO. DEPTH) / INV. EL. PROP. 11', 4"0 SDR35 PVC PVC These plans are an instrument of / / INV. EL. 22.01 (1/4" PER FT. SLOPE) service and are the property of the x Engineer. Infringements will be 24.63 prosecuted. 231 0 21.51 25.24 INV. EL. 22.24 X 2' Contractors shall verify all field / X 24.82 X conditions and dimensions and shall be responsible forfleldfif and INV. EL. 20.44 I°t'INV. EL. / quality of work. No allowances shall be made on behalf of the nwnc ~4wx:au 00 0 00 u'w aavnnv,uxaeaav D 00 M EXIST. 8' DIA. x ~ O 22.24 on his part for anyerror or neglect on his part. -SEAL HeIN NC '-0' Fc aVan ('l'xNtl 7' ED LEACHING 1 `r 4~ NEW / POOL TO REMAIN \\X PoA N'~ HOUSE CONVENIENCE STORE AREA (2,670 SF) X,e m aq'! ?,671 sF) Project EL 23.69 ON TRAP SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION (NO BASEMENT; No BASEMENT) GAMA_DEER PARK, INC. vv vvvo vv vvvo dl~~ o ao (1 STORY) FIN. FUR. 25.41' ..4, • OWNER: 3'-0 31 0" vIN vvvo 6' 'nlx. IN Tx. vvvo vvv vvvo CAST ETON FRAME AND 1', 4"0 OLD BROOKVILLE,NY LLl c vvv vvvo CAST IRON FRAME AND i W v v v v v v v INSECT TIGHT T LOCKING INSECT TIGHT LOCKING FUTURE _ INV. EL. PROP. 5 i4j / COVER TO FGRADE INISHED GRAD EXPANSION N20.53 V. EL. 8 PER SDR35 VC 0 COVER TO GRADE E Fr SLOP) j 320 FROST POND ROAD PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. vv vvv ' 24 z-o^m~ 21.03 O vv vvvo vvv vvvo 24 ¢a oc. INV. EL. INV. EL. MAIN RD, & FACTORY W v v v v v v v TRAFFIC SLABI 20' f/. zo' •'ri:,. za• \ / 20.53 21.93 AVENUE 2e" 'Oz tallR TRAFFIC SLAB INLET OUTLET MATTITUCK, NY HATERIIL FROM KITCHEN MIN. 4" DIAM SDR35 1° • Mial - n n LOW LME - u MEd, 4" DIAM. SDR35 ° MIN. 4" PITCHED 1/4":1, PVC PIPE OR FLOW LINE wI.J rv~mc TO SEPTIC TANK e Ny ly"~~ I .w MIN . 4" DGM. PITCHED EQUIVALENT PITCHED ~ PIPE OREQUNALENT SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP it l/0".P PITCHED 1/8".1- o2'„h pQ PROP. 1200 GAL. e' ow.I. °s e m INV. EL. SEPTIC TANK 20.44 (4' LIQUID DEPTH) DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT Y , 1000 142 01 27 , -MONOLITHIC 'NOlE6 - EXIST. COVER EL. 23.81 / ' I LtLLM NIM IIWAIIN W?1 M16YIL MietlLL DaR FaINLL VJ,II. i.1NF MtOtlIL LL.0 WIfIIIM'IWaWl.Hfrt II) V!Yb 4MV6 un Date: 02.25.09 drawing no, f~l'ar'u o"T 11= mOln m Nal, P11FavMO ON way MILT . ,'e'-o' OLIN. Yz (22.86) L i EXIST. 8' DIA. u .1• YS I e'-0' WMA. 7' ED LEACHING Scale: AS NOTED POOL TO REMAIN AL SEPTIC TANK 6 SANITARY SYSTEM PLAN LEACHING POOL DETAIL a TYPICAL GREASE TRAP s CYLINDRICAL SEPT 3 0„ SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" Drawn by: M.C. SCALE:NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: 2' = 1'-0" III KEMPEY ENGINEERING PARKING CALCULATIONS SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS AREA NAME AREA SIZE CODE REQ. REQUIRED PROPOSED REQUIRED DRAINAGE FLOOR L UNVL RAIL AREA, couNrER 2,275 SQ.FT. 1 SPACE/100 SQ.FT. 23 SPACES 26 SPACES 2772 CU. FT. / 68.37 CF/VF = 41 F/VF = 40.54 V.F. AREA AREA DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN T07 TOTAL 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY PACE k STORAGE AREA NAME SIZE FLOW FLOW FLOW FLO FLOW BY WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 * INCLUDING (1) HANDICAP PARKING SPACE EXISTING DRAINAGE SPACE: P: 631.321.7777 (3) @ 10' DIA. X 8' DEEP = 3 x EP = 3 x 8' = 24 V.F, SANITARY: GREY: TOTAL: SPA SITE DATA PROVIDED DRAINAGE CONVENIENCE 2,670 0.03 gpd/sf 0.02 gpd/sf 0.05 gp%1/sf ITEM AMOUNT % (3) @ 10' DIA. X 8' DER = 3 x FDP = 3 x 8' = 24 V.F. STORE SF =80 gdp =54 gdp =134 gdp 134 f 134 gdp F: 631.661.0486 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE ORIGINAL PLOT SIZE 24,140 SQ.FT. TOTAL DRAINAGE (0,55 ACRES) 48 V. F. CALCULATIONS FOR STORM WATER RUN-OFF RETENTION :NTION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 P. 631.368.3324 DEDICATED AREA (INCL. SOME 249 SQ.FT. AREA RUN-OFF COEFF. FT. OF RAIN CU,FT.PETENTION REQ LANDSCAPE AREA) :NTION REQ'D F. 631.368.1524 N°1 FINAL PLOT SIZE 23,891 SQ.FT. 100 O?,~wlY PAVEMENT 12,809 SQ.FT. 0.9 0.17 1960 CU.FT. O CU.FT. REVISIONS: m LANDSCAPE 8,412 SQ.FT. 0.25 0.17 358 CU.FT. BUILDING AREA 2,670 SQ.FT. 11.18 9 s CU.FT. Date Description No. BUILDING 2,670 SQ.FT. 1.0 0.17 454 CU.FT. 4 CU. FT. PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK/CURB AREA 12,809 SQ.FT. 53.61 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 2772 CU.F1. 2 C U. FT. RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE TOTAL LANDSCAPING/ BUFFER 8,412 SQ.FT. 35.21 INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AREA / m r OF VEMTAnO RAL SANITARY ' NAWRAL VEGETATION THAT IS MATTITIICK /PLAZA LLC TOTAL 23,891 SQ.FT. 2772 CU.FT. UNDEVELOPED AREA 0 SQ.FT. 0 EFECTE A AREAS NATU NEWSANITAG m B LANOSOA D BY NEW SANITARY WORK SHALL iSCAPED FOLLOWNG NEW TANK TC ID 7J X 17.95 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS 2 CU.FT. FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF / PEO FOLLOWING x IN INBTALLAl10N. SOUT HOLD PLANNING ED. EXISTING B" CONE y RETAINING :XISTING B" CONCRETE ec 15,32 ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) X 17.75 X 17.41 X tETAINING USE: WALDBAU M'S SHOPPING CENTER 15.92 / ,DON SITE LOC ZONING INFORMATION / WALL ALONG NOR' NALL ALONG NORTHERLY LOCATION 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/27!09 Y UqJ PROPERTY LINE IROPERTY LINE A S P H A L T P A R K I N 0 „I M11 I I`9 / zt.oB SCTM# S: 7y~ 99 ~ - ~~/li I a" fh r.;ly STREET ADDRESS: 9945 MAIN ROAD, MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NY m BW 11T. A6 Ilh I'' IfdL."'I','+;~"I~~I 'Ilia I~~I 1 9~ p{p .1^ 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 ZONING DISTRICT: B-GENERAL BUSINESS N 48.571301f f 1f BC 1E.J 8•.77 1 46"00 X10.90 I.57 30 E LANDSCAPE FRONT YARD REQUIRED: 4,193 SQ.FT. EXIST. ZR PGSED W HIGH SEaWTrsHA02o NDICATES PROP. 20' % TRASH PROPS CU. TO. TRASH E 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD PW09ro w0 LANDSCAPE FRONT YARD PROPOSED: 5,420 SQ.FT. ~Fw8 OPAE m ROPOE R IX'SO N LINK FFNGE GRADE BE FlLLED INENCLOSUR ON C Iy P COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE REQUIRED TO BE IN FRONT YARD: 50% N (~"°~N E CPAINSOUOK 1500 GOLB, FILL WdERA, EL 21.EL 23.70 ° CONTAINER (TYP,) SIRGA, TRAP TD 95K NAK. GENSItt. PROP. BOLLARD CHAIN ROPOSEO NNK D' FENCE SyHICN SECURITY PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE PROPOSED TO BE IN FRONTYARD: 64,64% / °'RI GALLON GREA: 3' ) CL t,,,' ` _ T-31 GWRORNL WITH WSxB.S ~4 1Vl, .1 11105110 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 40'-0" E E (e oI , s POST EVERY 5'-O.C. 9EW£R s.- . COMMENTS DATED 8/06110 fo, FRONT YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 77'-1 ° J/ METER NEIER = aF TC.90 SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 15'-0° es a ME ER SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 49'-2° Fea mom • PROPOSED L J L BC 2 .40 Y51 '4 REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 25'-0° e ; ;ro : r I p 1 (CONVENIEI 'w PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SF TC 24.90 91 h III Si'fil? (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA= 2275 S.F.) BC 24.40 • du' ~ ° Pxwi[t MR E REAR YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 21'-8"/ m ne uxo • wuRU wY uo 2JJ0 PROP. STACKED II II,ir .-y^ LIST OF DRAWINGS: e• MoE Emn < r~mroso _ 3 nw oeux _ RETAINING WALL SEE o 5 -R'' • GET, ON Si X 1525 % xT / woP°sn N' N ` PROP. 1200 PROP. 1200 gADII~G/A~ (0 VJ5~ > V nt/'f'~•BEPiIC WA IT iii -SHADED ARG INDICATES GAL ' Sheet Description CURRENT USE: GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE R ' ° n p ( 0 GAL SEPnC JJ) PROPOSED USE: 7-ELEVEN CONVENIENCE STORE TO BE FLUID IN. TANK ,pig rp l" l 14~ > / (n TOMMMTN DENSITY. "'N,AyMS• I,"~ PROP. E POOL SP-1 -KEY MAP muse T 2 .64 / / / / POIE MOUNTED -SITE PLAN moat 4 iM~ ~ ASPHALT PARKING -PARKING CALCULATIONS Jet ' 68 8022.E a (~ti R (22Re) 685 SF. PR POSED ADDITION /PKO m CARS ONLY ON'LYG(01 3) - - -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS n° TC 23. LExWr. e' 1010. TIC 25.00 2 KEY MAP B' D. L.P. BC 24.50 -SANITARY CALCULATIONS T' m ec ° , N PaoL ro R x ' l1 / EXISTING 8" CONCRETE RETAINING WALL ALONG -ZONING ANALYSIS 24. 4 C 24.4 RO . "ATM' EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE TO BE MODIFIED AS ,rte T TBC 24.36 24. 4 LEGEND S n a: Nttu 24. 4 24. 4 C 24. 4 WIN OW SIG TC 24.74 REQUESTED TO CONSTRUCT CROSS ACCESS IF 1fr SP_2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN TC = TOP OF CURB o oQ ,a Z`!"YS.OO Pm eeo m 4, REQUIRED. STRIPE STANDARDS - STANDARD =1 T.r-,;• 9M FILM MATERw EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE PROTECTED "FILM MATERIAL -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE etit[e UMP IS TO B MRMP 115 NO f DURING CONSTRUCTION. A•RED C- GREEN LANDSCAPE NOTES BT = BOTTOM OF CURB W •y1Pl Q go . TC 24 7\1- TO8 REO% 7-31 GUARDRNL WITH WBxB.5 T 4 00 POST EVERY Si O.C. X 19.90 (CARDINAL RED) 9800-55 (DARK !:;KEEN) i2 SP-3 -SITE DETAIL EL = ELEVATION EXIST. mI kg Q P' BC 24.25 023.50 7 ~ EQUIVALENT Pi 01707 EQUIVALENT P, 150342 .75 P BUILDING O rfi~ rc BC 2424 P OP. T.O.G. PROP. "7-11" WOOD CARVED / O AVERY 01003&7-11 RED A%5RY'# 10836711 GREEN "i IN WALL SIGN W/ GOOSENECK PROPOSED 1" DIAM. SCHEDULE K VVF'IITE REM SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN .2.25 E I OP. ¦ = MONUMENT' g,~"^, ~ , 22 BC 24.50 B-ORANGE -E , 22.75 _UGRTING / IDS • , COPPER WATER SERVICE D- L _ 'k1 o. L.P. 9823 (BRIGHT ORANGE) = DRAINAGE FLOW (,3 m° \EXIST. / • t ]'n6.1 • SIG c TOBBE EMOV ST. 1 I `PROPOSED LOCATION EQUIVALENT PMS * 165 E-BRONZE G E ~`1D• • , OF FLRURE CROSS AVERY R 10837-711 ORANGE PANTONE 18-'.".'5 NEW G SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY NEW GOOSENECK SIGN = UTILITY POLE EL OR E B' D. LP. PROP. T,O.G. C 23.25 ACCESS TO ADJACENT LIGHT C GAS P D INLET EL. 22.50 PRP°ENTO LIGKT WrTN ANGLE PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO BE EMOVEO ~C 22.75 TO 20.02 REPIECTOR ~q ~Iy 1 WING' EMPLOYEE PAPAQ'.YMOgN Ni -NEW 2 1/4'THICK WOOD A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS Col TO 23.25 1 u EXIST. GOMORNL TO BE REMOVED -NEW 2 1r 4"-Wn rc wnnL vcu DATUM: USGS- NGVD 1929 a SEE AS "V ; 24 70 TC 24.0 7" mEM I PROP. SfACNEp RETUNING WALL SEE 20'0 7-II BC 23 90 II u I pEL ON SP-3 7-11 51GNAGE WITHIN A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS M1 89.96 '21! SO.fT. CE01 C 23.50 2a19 A NEW II f011 fYlYllE i1PHX0 1 RNMNS YWR6KHFM6 m BC 23.0 •wIN Ar 1_3 BC 23,00 9 m mx 1wI 22b'.~~ a 1 -A L/ NEW 10' 5QUARE WOOD 2.1 2fi.4 'U 25.55 _ COWN COLUMNS- WHITE- WITH 12' 26.56 48057'3 W DC 26 t ~X, EL 24.64 3 W ~15EL 24.32 1 98.00 EL .47 n eau u C h MATCH EL 24.fi{ X cw' ~ mx % % ~qm 22.3o n D b MATCH 5QUARE STONE BASE, TO " MATCH BUILDING 7hess plans are an Instrument of 26.85 iC 28.7 EL 24,20 EL 2 22.51 P..". servke and are the property of the .,~6 ~NEW'CONrrA1. jA •5 ERROR TC 21.01 E sV Aaw^ mx L • EXIST. SON 3. . X d0aS 2 AMFiSm 'xcv L 22.81 UE MARKER Engineer. Infringements will be TC 26.56 %25.95 SIPEW~OR:::T.)*: ERROR BC 26.83 MLlu r.n^'..:, 1~.. L: ~".:~'t ' ~..r.•~.~~.ll .:..rv.q. e~•.a, o. a.u;;vy wrt '-1IUxOC - 1":ir'~r:Jj}'4t•k{}.'r'•4i'..a3j1i .J ni svpE VOx, QNLf xLY IXI NCN 25 5 07004 9 1152 529 prosecuted. 325.39 Ew$T, va :24.56 NEW NRF On tt 9T 11 me°0i nu4• UP S DOND SIOEWA JRF UT tt ST p,}p N X21. ) II I ?:-.y~):... XIST 0 Y Contractors shell verify all held fiC 24.60 TC 4.137 ~,,.p V TC 20.82 P iC 4,0) NO ENMY Avoo1 t• RAYINJ . B 23,65 C 23.26 TIPE I 3 C 20.84 oonditlans and dimenalons and ONE B 23.65 C 22,92 shell be responsible for field fit and DfiL YELLOW LIN c MIS SERVER - ? sNx?D mu MF ATE 20,5®BC 20.4.) TO PUBLIC NHIi UNE \ 29 WATER MAIN > NEW IF! quality ofworlL Noalbwances p. ~nd ? WHITE LINE 1 V , A I 4.9(WIDTH VARIES) o _ (-10111 VARIES a x.RIIx10 AP E f-o' - - R NEW 'ELDORADO'5TONE, shell be made on beheN of the x N i 326.92 MORRIS _ 1 Q (S.R. 25) S""-' nN16 NANruI oc ~ -ILS • r ace raw CLOSED EXN NANTUCKET 5TYLE WTrh Contractor for anyertor or neglect cCA1 PRECA5T CONCRETE CAP, on his pert. .7rnL WHITE LINE 26.26 - 24.M 2 5 REMOVE EXIST. A: \ DEL ELUO UN REPLACE WITH N5W. EW. NEW W SIDEWALK TO TO M MA' TO MATCH BUILDING 2 TU RN I NC LAME TO MEET EXISTING AD,JACENT RAMP FLUSH k LEVEL REFER FER TO CONC. 5PLANTE 1DE PLANTER AREAS ON EACH Project m DEL YELLOW ONE 2 2 SIDEWALK DETAILS. (SP-5 5 NYSDOT) SIDE 0 O L YE OW E =)21.53 R-2' EACH) 51DE OF 51GNAGE (9-4' x B' 4 (NYSDOT R.O.W,) X20.48 w EACH) 26.23 26.03 (ROUTE 25) NEW 1E1 NEW VLDORADO' STONE, OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, INC. 25.25 TC 26.31 TC 25.09 TC 25.85 24.43 6C 2560 BC 2556 fiC 2654 ~ CONC L 61 TC 2132 TC 2463 24.43 T (VARIABLE WIDTH) r NANTUI NANTUCKET 5TYIE 320 FROST POND ROAD C 26.16 BC 24.67 BC 24.06 TC 24.5] BC 24.06 - ( UP ~UP O O fP OLD BROOKVILLE,NY IP a " PHIECA', PRECAST CONCRETE CAP PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. 6TOP ONE NOTE: ~p E NO l{11 f~ IYAI' TIE IVLNI ~O NEW 2 NEW 2 1W THICK WOOD MAIN RD. & FACTORY G~ THERE ARE NO URB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE !1 ADJACENT P ERN BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE LANE PANEL- PANEL- WHITE- WITH CARVED AVENUE 7-11 7-11 51GNAGE WITHIN MATTITUCK, NY FOR WORK ON STATE HIGHWAY AND v 7-1 1 WOOD STREET SIGN W/ IGN W/ SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROADWAY =<v 3 GOOSENECK FIXTURE DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT R"ROVEMENP PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25" BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. SP-1 MCAMi: 31V - 11L& 1000 142 01 27 ~V Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. 1 SITE PLAN DIC - 6 2UID P-1 SCALE: V = 20'-0" ~Q ALL SITE INFORMATION IS BASED UPON A SURVEY DATED 02/16/06, JOB NO, 06013, BY: Scale: AS NOTED Spearre I ~VOLWrUTN & d' BRUSH FNJMm1EN ROShl ]6] 6YF MM MYIF !LE NM~N.t~1 VI0 .~u1~1ju-m¢ D rawn by: M.C. II LANDSCAPING NaM : I RAW i PL 1. COVERALL PLANTING BEDS WTTHA humAuMor 2• THIcONEss OF HARDWOOD MULCH. KEMPEY ENGINEERING r ~,E 2. ATPIANTING BEDS INPARKINGAREASANDAREAS OF REQUIRED TRAFFICVL9mII.RY USE IOW PROFDEPLANTDIGS. 9, 1~r ~[arats~._. ~••l oro m nH l~ MANMM OE30R OF SWAKNIC TIE j 3 1,. ~nno 3. DURING LOCAL GROWING MASON. OWNER SHALL PURCHASE AND PLANTANNUAL FLOWERDIGPLANTS AS REQUIREDZ AS UQUMM IN PLAMMG BBDB TP CLOSE GAPS IN PLANITNGAREAS ANDOO ADD COLORAND VABmTYTOLANDSCAPING. HrvY m-I r..nn wer u+H--I HM+W HR Ci,~'"~ ii A PROVIDRNEWIN-OMMEMGAMONSYSTEMATALLRBASOFL*MWAPINGASRBQUMMBYCODE. 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY 5. RTREETTREES. MEET TREES WITHA MINIdUMCALE'ER OF FOUR INCHES SBALLBEPLANEDAND/ORMAWTAINEDAC 1. r' ROAD FRONTAGES INACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 30 PEST ON CENT EL MAMAWM ADIACMUTO ALL WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 Mm P: 631.321.7777 [AMENDED 2-10.20K EFFECTIVE }3.20041 6. PARKING AREA SCREENING. ALL PARHINGAREAS EL41LBESCREENIEDFROMVIEWWITFIA HEDOB, BERM AND/OR DECO MANDMDBCMATMWALLOR F: 631.661.0486 ~!~Ly ~1y ^I^t yam, 1 1 { I~+I PENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS. 7. DECORATIVE OFF4TREET PARKING LOTISGHTS SHALL BEUNIIORMLYAPPLIED INSTALLEDANDMAINTAINED. ODIEOAL TAR PLAWM LIRE AAAWM M IETNEATT AORS RTALOK $ Ms WE 'IM TAB,,BD. 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE S. OFP-STREETPARKINGLOT LIGHTFDCNEHS SHALL BENONADIOSTABLEIE)BTLONTATLYMOUNI'EDPDMMO WITHL89: NENETY•DEORM LUMINAmB CUTOFF. =MWDBLBSSTNAM EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 Y ?!nm a M.IS YI 10 11 /~'yy~[y,O~!~y[yl~I~t~ VI IHRWIIHm HI~HlO PDMIRES THAT PROJECT LIGHT OR (BARE TOWARD THE STREET RIOHT-OP-WAY OR ADJOININGPROPERTIBB®ALL NOT I MUMBO MNOTBBPBRAmmm. P. 631.368.3324 qHH~~1~1~+ / 4N11'C{04 +HnAHOnr..~._._ Il:. 11! l,Y~,~ Y ~HIH W?I I~HHa., \ r~~'~ ~ 9, P®RRTRIAN LLOHTIINOSHALI.USDNIPORMLY APPLIED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ALONG PEDISTUUAN WALKWAYS MWALRWAYSANDALLBYWAYe. F. 631.368.1524 v ` HIt YI RIOR Ha~...,1 10. BUIDWG-MOUNTHDLIGIlTFICPURBS SHAMES FOR SAPETYOR SIGNAGEPURPOSES ONLY AND MUST DIRECTLIGNT DO M=UM DOWNWARD. •Y 1~~' ~ ila WH :ELMOM SLM "T `y~"~»~''1(_I_I_ ~:4~. f•j-E Fs ..._....1 .l WALL-PACK LIGHTS OR OTEM LIGHTDD THAT BERM OUTWARD TOWARD ADJOINING PROPERTIES OR THE STREET RIG SHALLBEFROEimTM SHIELDING SHALLBE PROVIDED TO AVOID LIGHTTRRSPASS AND GLARE. umsn BBPRIOBT-D&WAY REVISIONS: aeons HH yi » X11-7L "'~A'~~i ~tra~'iY'•••"'~ ml~m w. 1:. 11. DECORATIVE STREETLIGHTS OPNOTMORETHAN 12 FEET IN HEIGHT SHALLBB UNIFORMLYAPPLDID, INSTALLED AND NALLBD AND da~uc'o!m mr ~~~eo w'r BAR OGOF SMA PUWTMC ISYmLG W.RWIL/+YVR N~ MAINTAD! MUMATBD W SDEWALRCUTOUTSEVERY 30 FEBT ON CENTER ALONG THE SITES FRONTAGE, THE SAME LIGHTING PERTURB SHALL BE APPLIED TO EACH MAW STREET BUSINE Date Description No. f 9TRB61' BUSBJB99 D1911LICf. Htl ~ IA .In L- ~ ea 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD r/ O 114 Y~ NSF 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS 3.-_._. gA 1 33 MATTINCK PLAZA LLC FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF ps~ I SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. / TC 18.33 ac 1e.sz ZO 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD EXISTING S" CONCRETE NE: GENERAL BUSINESS B y' / d RETAINING USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 WALL ALONG NORTHERLY I UL13 PROPERTY LINE a A 5 P H A L T P ARK I N G 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD iMWA PURT PIAGHRNA AW SLOPE Toff PLWAOIS - . COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 Y - dpi-ra~R- rui 70 •57f301f E 146.00 I. 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD SPATE _N 48 COMMENTS DATED 12/08109 LANDSCAPE SCHWULE OG EXISTING NATURAL VEGETATION KHY BOTANICALNAME COMMONNAME SEM QUANTITY A, I \1 A~ _AJ 11/05/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 I 1O PICBARUMNS RED 917IUCB 4"mia nL 12 SENSE El£C. - (~2 CUPMSOCYPARIS . ' UnWRD CYFM5 30"dIL 35 N9~O O® METER METFA _ 4'-0" MIN. ODE50ME BUFFER i CODE SMTON0280- AS LIST OF DRAWINGS: O IBUCOTHOBRACEMDRA RWEeTmumicOTH08 V.&H IA / F' r 0 (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA= 2275 S.F.) / / ®p' O THOIAOO=HNTAI.IRMORA E AMERICAN ARBORVITAE TH 23 a/ F W ® sk D PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SF 0. L J L J I PD TOWN CODE secnoN 2eD- PROP. STALKED / < ® RETAINING WNL SEE ALKED Sheet Description QS RINIPBRUSCHRQNSM 0 OOLDCOAMUNOEB 11-dia I93 WALL SEE SP-S / [\,v/ ,O y 00O 0 6K~JFA -W DEi. ON 5P-3 //ll``AA d ALLRXMrMLANDBCAPETORHWAW SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN T EUMWW3MATO 5 WWOMNUONYIM 34TH 9 -PARKING CALCULATIONS S ULM M MMW M1 "VALLBYPOROE" AMMCMMM'VMJEYPOROE+ 21/Y Oils 3 wil ~l \ \ 0 ® 'R I / / ? I r'T'I PoSIONAGE: COMPACT -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS lV\ /1 d-[ CMS ONLY (Ott. 3) HE 22.e1 685 SF. PR POSED A DITION 't T/ T? / A 5 P H A L T °MP^:T -SANITARY CALCULATIONS . (QTY. d) ASPHALT P ARKI NG -ZONING ANALYSIS SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN 0.0 ~ { J~ / iii I m r- 0 s -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE ti Q NttN p ® I P I -LANDSCAPE NOTES I ~ r~ r~ I SP-3 -SITE DETAIL I T-31 DwRDNVL wRH Wem., 0 P• J PTST EVERY S'-3. O.C. ~UARMdVL 0M19.5 EXIST. km ,:S o I EXIST. FUEL TANKSOO 1'-0' MIN. IANDSCAPE SUFFI O ? ® NEB W-3 w A. UNOS 2153 N WE BUFFER AS SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN AN LOGE SECTION N 250-05. BUILDING TO BE REMOV PER TOWN CODE SECTION 3S Sa ® JALEL~ GA5 PUM ISLANDI * PROPOSED 1" DIAM. SCF TED • DIAM. SCHEDULE K TO 3E MOVED I COPPER WATER SERVICE i WATER SERVICE SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY PH-1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TC 20.02 A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS ~•r yR n ~~JIr ` _ - ~p~.r( IIAI, IILIyy~,` . 0 ,E~' i.;::':W1-oe ~01 I q I I (rn Ir`AC C D fl d TO 30.02 .i it 5 T9 E_ EM9 ® * *A II z' TC zo,D A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS PROP. 7-LLVEN' • Nli. SIGN II, 4„ 4'• m m®0 ® _ m ® see ® QQ® •m eee ns are an ns imen o ~1 C 28.51 c 28.58 2p GNOSSEEO NP SOIL a 48~ p ST.B' BUSH MST.6' BtSq ry•?fr service and are the property of the BC 26 26 v..k`•.H, ® CJ J I J Q I`I o ® a ® ST.B' BUS . ~q[~. Engineer. Infdngamerds will be TC 26.) •:)Ay((~~•••5T •I •...ya.;ny'..:':... a iRExcx nux 00 EMIST.S prosecuted. TC .56 1Y.~~i;: ~m tip. CONGA'APEW.IIJZ;f',:;'`.4..-k':;")'le:e;:"'.A~. 1~ tl015 ~LSWfI]EN ST. 22.57 t01 BU5N 250)04 BC 26.23 _ ° ENIST, SIG NEW 1URF U TY STq II C R 0 S 5 W A L K CONC SIpEWA *21R7M TC 21.01 Cenbactors shal vadry all fled condltlons and dlmenelo Cn~s~ ~and : V] c a, Be 24.60 IS D 20M shall be responsible for Flald fit and NO @71YY ..~Th~6;;15 RAwT.h TC 24.W lb i WHITE UNE BC 2165 TC 28.36 quality of work No aloeances COL. YELLOW U aC 2292 C ~ m ATE ®BC shall be made on behalf of the WHITE UNE W- M PUBLIC Contractor for an rror orn lect CATER MAIN 4 on his pBd. SEAL - a WHILE LINE I (WIDTH VARIES) R(1 A E1 S.R. 25) -I-` V H I 1 N O q O W17 LINE 9 TURNING LANE DBL LLO UN Va Project - p8L YELLOW uNE ~ LYE OW E OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, INC. p TRUCKS m (NYSDOT R.o.W> 320 FROST POND ROAD _ NHITE I iC 25,31 TO 2800 TC 25.95 (ROUTE OLDBROOKVILLE,NY, Be 258R Be 5, Be 25.54 CU TC 28.82 (VARIABLE WIDTH) i ze::s UP C 28.18 Be 24,87 TO 24,58 ~UP ~QuP m Be 24.M IF I} 3" :3f .u: PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. DEC - 6 2m I 1 I' L g4" 94° STW LINE NOTE; NOTE; f MAIN RD. & FACTORY ~O G( THERE ARE THERE ARE NO RB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE AVENUE ll ADJACENT F ADJACENT P ERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE LANE MATTITUCK, NY Q SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP FOR WORK ON STATE HIGHWAY AND R5-2A V TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25" / v DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT 1000 142 01 27 2 SIGNAGE DETAIL BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. v Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. SP-2 SCALE: 1 1/2 " =1 '-01 L SC E PLAN 4 ALL E INI ALL E INFIXtMATIpN IS BASED UPLN Scale: AS NOTED DERIVED FROM: STANDARD HIGHWAY P- SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" A SUR GATED A SUR GATED 02/10/OB. JOB N0. , J. BY: SIGNS & MARKINGS BOOK, 2004 & ~YOLLML ~YOLLMT~HNdr BRUSH SP_ 2 Mp MUTCD 2009 m_ Drawn by: M.C. II d r _ 4a w~Y TMl Planting in accordance with LYw~~NY1Ty"1 ~wrrrrr Sect. VII, Landscaping. Table KEMPEY ENGINEERING PROVIDESTSELCAP ~,d HMI Yrr VII - 3. ' umber Yip • DDL RTES. BULLARD varp 6 aa high arboaonc. y LB- Conc. slab (aw around II iB' biyh ' c. fennc. .11 blink e °II 6'-0• LONG FE.LM SOLE) around. Wprnrt '8 day strength 1 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY r e' INDUSTRIAL TYPICAL CONC. Meal id TIER 0gvaY go a- .I - .In STREET REPAIR CURB GUTTER IaM~°o4'e meeh .,in 3' TOPOPEXMASPHALT w cover 3' Cob port i3` Cob poet WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 PATCHAB REQD (OR SLATTED FABRIC TAIL saxodrw r p 1e•a.. (typ ) TYIl OFNEWSLM) .un°wrµiwi . r1/Ya T e TYPICAL CONCRETE CURB auAPer PLAN ° ~,DVO 1 '"p' P: 631.321.7777 ll pwnl DmMed 'a'° F: 631.661.0486 Unce°' -1/Te Slaw '1/2' . U. two GUTTER & STREET REPAIR D° a• NOTES; e• a' . W , ' 1- /2'e rnoin rmp.r w aewx. 1. - Length and width to be determined by the architect or " engineer ae neceseitoted by the need. of the site. The size I. e architect or r b. The e architect 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE • : wro w. awe Ln wP. Fw1Ynq _ area uu•'Iy~1r1 TM subject to the approval of the Town Engineer k Planning board. 1S` ILYµ1~rw"r r Planning board. EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 He DIAK x 3410 DBE POURED ED CONIC. C.lOOPD7O to' a lb.. xe ckc---~ 4000 3000 P.S1 CONCRETE <uee"'•reu e•wrr.a I 4efr ryerrerr r~ P. 631.368.3324 i; F. 631.368.1524 erre.r INDUSTRIAL STANDARD STREET REPAIR CURB REVISIONS: TYPICAL STREET CURBS Date Description No. STREET REPAIR DETAIL GATES 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER CONS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INCORPORATED TOWN F SO TWCIAL BOLLARD DETAIL '2~ BUFFER FENCE AND PLANTING DETAIL IETAIL (2 REFUSE ENCLOSURE DETAIL SP-3 SCALE: I'-0" SP-3 SCALE: I'-0" SP-1 3 NTS $P-3 SCALE: P-0- L 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF OUTHOLD PI,Ah%M B 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22109 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD ih AAr.NYY COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 ' xlYe/irtlWa~ NOM Irr.YU.r~ewe I Depth ofelo`mptobpbud6Rdlrwnbtivem 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD f Dleablllty Curb CW I I ~M'r'•'r )sweet brim dWtctin II II o`f_shuctme, 2.-All shimmee eee to be Need to Sod WI&udo6 COMMENTS DATED 12108/09 1 Bumper a II II bael.l oppmpdote wHd cr detbdcorner. See Swam V6 bbr rw.."..xww.~ gIPL'ndme. 34" 11105110 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD III II I T` rr BPSCHrICATIONw: COMMENTS DATED 8/06110 A A Pali RTST 12Ae67HDPpI1'AN ' e•rr B• wide bir NASD CAFFm -"Iewwr O 45. 9'-0 0 .ter BAS& NDN. 8 l/3"DW.TCW P 9Y)IlAyB SFIO®ASH 19 YM` OIAM. HUASE CDVRR. Rat =VUAU LIST OF DRAWINGS: / rY ...Y n 3 ANIHOY M(4"%30` WYTH9` HDOC, !0` Wf189.900C. /V wWY:ir. e.rwY MATERIAL 4•MULALDM. POLE SHAFT BE LI1N.1=~l^,,. ~ Sheet Description ARMARMIRLV IB MIUCATHDPROM SDML TUBINGWMACASPALUMDl11 ,HTERH& ATIM fRMKIM PARKRIO INPLACE WPIH(3)STARUIMSHOR,HSP p~PT imt. SP-1 -KEY MAP SITE PLAN alla.illiff -PARKING CALCULATIONS PLAN o 110SCREW& WH:1[SCPOLYESTHBPOWDERCOATIN HANDICAPPED SIGN wbac as blue MAGNIHLACK. 0WIMMATIN DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS O LUMNAMM MSIROPOLITAN.2 SANITARY CALCULATIONS e" MAJOR TREE PLANTING BED p blw e .trip. .trip. ARpw3"epidmm trr4lpRm~t I u11Np0 Y] N Blue InNmationtl ..a... Iar Pr'in't Oolp-PNDId.1 ZONING ANALYSIS StandbN Stall e'-D" aawnlWlily P eda6erdbVap my Na 614-DOreppmregad m H,TSbtlwShnoSlrl~aplNry, Om to '-Ow SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN Handicapped Stall TRW10 RO NIe.Y~.er p e' wide stripe ( .se I..r.rer...1"ewrlwe W WreY.e~ n LANDSCAPESCHEDULE ete 1) ri errernre...r..r r.rwer II Reefmta-6"pipmkfml. pmrcWm6ebrrmbrWr-Irppmiy®- 4• Daoni `LANDSCAPE NOTES P.vlo.erloeprd Mrld 12' pawwwm o 19 4lleph-2l egeosplhmorree Variable diamel.r SP-3 -SITE DETAIL ' Oo y rY ND 1E: B' wide stripe O 1. -For two I~ mdd miNbh d 13 1 4" SP4`TRUCK ROUTING PLAN yellow. - way Ira 1BAFFIC FLAW 45' n'-O' ( For one way traffic, not. 1) ' For one strlpplnq to be e wM1it r lle. xarreee SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY ARplrip DrP.V.G w.Y~Yrwl tipbbeOR77. 210"Mh PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Omeee~ ^ SECTION A-A A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS ~1 CTRTPINC: nP.TATT. K4MnR TRRIt l9releYfirMdrrTYYmmrtee.Armmhrr i mNswnT 1'--\ - f%kT \TqM OTllAll l " A 1 TA nY'f l1AAT OA A J : o L WXLIYa 1l1~tf3.L~lAl7l. rV VL g \ LIGHT POLE DETAIL A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS SP-3 SCALE: I"= V-O" SP-3 SCALE: = P-0" SP-3 NTS SP-3 SCALE: ^ F-0- These plans are an Inelrumeet of BMWs end are the properly of the Engirmar. Inhfngements will be prosecuted. Contractors shag verify all field oondglens and dimensions and 20 iZ 00 _0 11111111 be responsible for field fit and 1",o quaily, of work No allowances 'COMPACT PARKING shell be made on behalf of the Contractor for anyenor or r ftw O ONLY SIGN BEYONO D on his pert SEAL Project Counter Slope of Surfaces Adjacent to Curb Ramps T-31 GALV, METAL GIIARGRAIL SYfSTEM W/ OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, INC. NTS W6x8.5 POST E 6'-3' 320 FROST POND ROAD CART RNINPRAM NDCOVRRTOORADR CAST MONT COVERS O.C. COPING STONE TOP SOIL OLD BROOKVILLE,NY D78DDRAM LORADE P01®®DORADE-~ xa' Iw I PROP, CONC. CURB PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. TRAFFIC SLAB 20' s"' TRAPPICSLAB p. 8"11 x B'W x I8"L Sn• STACKED RETAINING MAIN RD. & FACTORY m FROM R7fCHEN - z D4LeT STONE WALL PROP. ASPHALT AVENUE 'E a MIN.4• PITCHED IIP:I, TO SWM TANK MEN. 4" DTAIWL WR7S EF=TANK PVC PIPE OR M INAY~R- OUIT.BT s~ GEOGRID EVERY ' - 3/4" CRUSH CLEAR MIN. 4" DUR Prr= .4- CUR PDCIE~ HQUIVALRN'1'PD'CF® NON. 4" CLAIM. SDR35 30 2'-0' VERTICALLY O.C. + - _ STONE MATTITUCK, NY U!":I' 1' IM":1' PIPEOREQUIVALRNT 3< PDC®U8"P EXIST. EXISTING SITE SOIL RETAINING - a~ m WALL ON i TOP SOIL 16"DIAN. x 3'-9* DEEP SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP ADJACENT POURED CONC. FOOTING 3000 P.S.I. CONCRETE DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT -MONOLYMC D MAX HI' OAiJF1: LOLDHIC PROPERTY MAX.ID' GALMf. _ E FILTER FABRIC 1 000 142 01 27 P S 300 ID @ 300 R Y 300 10, @ 500 a - - F 11' T 700 IT T 700 ? ~ _ _ - _ REINFORCED SOIL !W tlY IilOO~hp, 5. W-o' MIN, 121-a' MA(. T rS 11 RUSH CLEAR Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. V~STONI • -0 MIN. =1221'* f'-0' NO, X91 SIDES OF CURB RAMPS ip CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK Scale: AS NOTED 1 TYPICAL GREASE TRAP 12 STACKED WALL & GUARDRAIL DETAIL Z DETAIL SPmmmm3 SP-3 SCALE: 41"= r-v SP-3 SOLE: III= ,-0. SP-3 SCALE: 2.. =1,-ON SP_3 SCALD. _ lx-0N Drawn by: M.C. DEC-62010 u KEMPEY ENGINEERING h 4-4j O = N C) QQ N 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY hp~40 ~Um J WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 Q j hU2" y~ ~j UQ~h Q4 P: 631.321.7777 F: 631.661.0486 u d U J ~ ,~h~Z N U2 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE ~ O h W $S' mU U h0 tu EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 N ~~v 23 rloq P. 631.368.3324 26.17 F. 631.368.1524 V ?6.13 n REVISIONS: ~,~WAr 4Q NN U - PROP. ELEVATED hm 00 "7-ELEVEN" SIGN Date Description No. SEE DETAIL N tP 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE ORP RATED TO OF SOUTH OLD STOP n 3 N/F 25,98 N 249 SQ.Ff. DEDICATION h FOR FUTURE TURNING / MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF 0) co RADIUS IMPROVEMENTS OUTHOLD PLANNING BD. N STOP N cv 26.15 9 / TO 10.73 ac le.sz EXISTING 6" CONCRETE ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS B y RETAINING USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD Q? co h. 26.00 ° 5 WALL ALONG NORTHERLY r A S P X A L T P A g K N C COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 LIL13 PROPERTY LINE a / 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD j, BC 25.65 X COMMENTS DATED 7!29/09 25.95 N 48'57'30" E 146.00 m - 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD TC 26.10 X X / p® EXISTING NATURAL VEGET ION COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 11105110 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 26.95 25, 39 0 0 SETER U-' /.0 METER M•--~ COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 0 PER TOWN COOE Sa EEMONwY2190-9a. FOR WORK ON STATE HIGHWAY AND p PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,670 SF ® L, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROADWAYy r O PT (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA- 2275 S.F.) / ® ® 0 LIST OF DRAWINGS: WROVEMENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25" O 0 PROP. STACKED BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. w - _ _ _ _ -w f RRET"NCSW&L SEE Sheet Description / J o O T T A~ DETAIL OF CORNER RADIUS = SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN Z 4 ®0 i 0 / / I \ \ ' / I., NP Ln ~V 0 / / / M Pn" " -PARKING CALCULATIONS SCALE: 1" = 101-0" sn~ aD 22.01 685 SF, PR POSED ADDITION m C LYO(O A 9'P H A L T PARKIN G Ilk ~ Y 0 H NYT11{ 0 -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ec as.m -SANITARY CALCULATIONS -ZONING ANALYSIS W J ~ .1 W. ~ ,IN 3b SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN Y ~H .LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE QQ w OQ A 1 -LANDSCAPE NOTES W ~ ~=m ® d 19. P T-31 OI ARORNL WITH WGx0.5 f a' ttP. J POST EVERY W- SP-3 -SITE DETAIL EXIST. e9 'nta "tY® © O ] O.C. MIN. ~N~E AS 4-0 PER TOWN CODE S CRON0290-95. BUILDING LQa PROPOSED T' DIAM. SCHEDULE K SP4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN imo~3° ® •I r COPPER WATER SERVICE SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY V 4,p m y6 e PH-1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 47 ~ TO 20.02 A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS x~=; PA TC 20.10 PROP.]-ELE4EN ~•tp ID SIGN A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS i WSW v These plans are an inebument of service and are the property of the a z6se ^;,•i,~ m o® o m o® ®®Q @40 `''a. GRAS E215i.8'0~9fR O I". ¢ Engineer. ~I1nfringements will be Bc 26 D BEE01N 5 30 10I5T. 8• BUSH ® ® O ~Y o pmsewted. TC 26. 09! 2.1. ® wsT.e• Bus TIMICH oAw Contraotom shall verity all field 015 TC 2 57 EIJI H IM STN SII NER TC 21.01 NW,ZdG1~T510(Wgll~•.:{.5"r'CT'j'`y].a'~t; j^.::7^~I,.I .OP7y~ etivv CI~ 250]01152Y condltbns and dimensions and Tc 6.s6 BC 26.23 E%IS NEW N UIIUTY ST it +~~1;.Nr 1,341 .y,ti°V y5' IIII R 0 W CSC SOEW shall be responsible for field fit and IIIIIII `2G"'w1Ghl^?y. v~ RIA quality of work. No albwwances BC 24.88 A y B B W A L ST_ OV TC 20.52 m UNE BC 23,85 C 23.38 20.84 shall be made on behalf of the m BC 22.92 ®BC 20.4J Contractor for anyarror or neglect on his part SEAL DBL YELLOW E _ TO PUBLIC L~ GAD WHITE UNE 'M- MATER MAIN = Om • WHITE LINE MA I ( IOTN VARIES) R (S.. R. Project R _ N KHITE ux c ~ ~ PVC TURNING LANE EEL 0 UN - DEL YELLOW LINE OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, LYE 0W E a _ INC. WlI LINE (NYSDOT RAW) _ 320 FROST POND ROAD ec 20.31 Bc 20.02 TC BC 2F.M CONC CONC CURB TC 241 B) TIC 21,53 (ROUTE 25) OLD BROOKVILLE,NY C 26.16 C, } ~UP ''OP O O BC 2..08 (VARIABLE WIDTH) 3t. L LL LL fill STOP LINE NOTE; r r r L PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. MAIN RD. & FACTORY Gt THERE ARE NO CU CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE fHE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE r 1'~r 1) ADJACENT PROP BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND M, ( RD. AND MARLENE LANE AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY Ulm r Q FOR WORK ON STATE: ON STATE HIGHWAY AND V SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 4 TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE 3NALS, SEE "ROADWAY DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT er IMPROVEMENT PLANS ENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 2511 1000 142 01 27 BY DUNN ENGIN?RRm NGM?RRI G ASSOCIATES, PC. 1 TRUCK ROUTE PLAN Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. P4 SCALE: V = 20'-0" (TRUCK PATHS SHOWN REPRESENT ALL SDA 02/16/06, IS RASED UPON Scale: AS NOTED A RORYEY IM M IN M JOB NO. U35013, PON BY. _ WB-50 DESIGN VEHICLE) A suRM oe ~YOG YOLLMUR BBl/FN pll4a S 3N dYE Ptl111 RNIIE WE PoIW.~.VfNi)1! / Drawn by: M-C- 01C - 6 2010 I 1 KEMPEY ENGINEERING 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 P: 631.321.7777 r F: 631.661.0486 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 „ "~~IIh O'~ ' ^ i i P. 631.368.3324 My F. 631.368.1524 'o ~b REVISIONS: rl _ yy r" A~'~'~ r' Nif~, "IY'"i lk iii ,~;In Date Description No. - ~ ~a 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TILE INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD i ' 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. it d i,. I~4N~' r' 111, 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD ~ I d.x ~R11hi` k;, via COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 , ,III( , lit 1 4iJ Is ~ t r' , 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD ~II 9 till, £ M r ; ig I' " pI~Q Y vv . ~µt i~ ' p " p" COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 IlII r~ ,,I~;~t'a~iRlil o~~,~ Opu T 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 i ~i~ uktll o- - h In it ~l I. i, ~ I ~ psi 11105110 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 16 I hI COMMENTS DATED 8/06/10 ,b, It ` ~ '~lllil~~IJIyi~IV6A.: ~ F 1 it ~!1s Ul . YI "~~~~~~~~~~~I~' .~';4V~J~ rT'~~~T q R J' i 4 ~ Ile' . LIST OF DRAWINGS: a s ~9i Yri :.:lr : n+w~ - * ga•~ ~m~ Sheet Description a y'}j;hu 1 I'", 1111 I r R.y 'Li PiL SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN -PARKING CALCULATIONS _ - _ . " ra,, ii tip. ! ~Ft N a?" gym' 1'" ra.- -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS v 6d et IF i'"1~ t .u C` ~ `t y ' - J w x 41. Ilk u~g 1~.4NM -SANITARY CALCULATIONS NMI r _ , r. _i .sk GS; j iX~ I .S n v i -ZONING ANALYSIS ~d 9- " .F" ~~F -a ~4' k ~I C 'Aar t SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN .kt , h ~ ~ { 4 'S. n,~r ~ hI I ' ~~-~u LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE p e I, ' I~~ J M A~IY -LANDSCAPE NOTES nn `rG 1 F n M r x Yl~jil1;"iII Ili 4i III' P GwiAMVn' $'J4oWt m ' 3, r '1[i'r SP-3 -SITE DETAIL :f 101,111,11 ~ ~ ~ y~ ~9 ~ ~ {III ~ 9: wr SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN L 1 r y' y f' t - w ItIt, r. SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY 'Itil MA. dy.,+, PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN v y ~N ~ 'SR _ . ~ ~ 41111 N~IF' x` ~ry' ,5~' ~~yy., m4r D''f I ask ' "ai nl l I FIE. d ~I J ~ t _ _ht 'k~'syw ~ ~ {{II pjR A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS iI III I; All These plans ere an Instrement of service and are the properly of the Engineer. Infringements vril be prosecuted. ~-TILL x,14 _ k ~ til Connectors shall verify all field M, 11 conditions and dimensions and shall be responsible for field fit and quality of work No alomnces shell be made on behalf of the Contractor for anyerror or neglect SEAL on his part I I,i .ai yi ~ i Project OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, INC. `AFC, 320 FROST POND ROAD OLD BROOKVILLE,NY PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT 1000 142 01 27 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. L SITE PLAN OVERLAY ON AERIAL PHOTO P-6 SCALE: I" = 401-0" ALL SM INFMM ALL 91 INFW/14/N IS BASS) 0 Scale: AS NOTED A SURKY DAM OT/Ii/OE, JOB NO. N0. 0001 001], BY: SPioaini6 ~YOLLNLUTH ~YOLLNUTH d' onxmu onvlmvw-wo wlnxroN wo sue van uw:E uuc wwlux. nne -kil el Drawn by: M.C. W a~ DEC-62010 - I I' KEMPEY ENGINEERING Luminaire Schedule Project: All Projects Symbol Oty Label Arrangement Lumens LLF Description 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY -O 4 Metro -2 SINGLE 6300 0.8 70 watt HPS type 4 distr WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 so 6 Metro -2 SINGLE 6300 0.8 70 watt HPS type 4 distr with glare shields P: 631.321.7777 3 Pavilion-3 SINGLE 4000 0.8 Wall light -full cutoff 50 watt HPS 3 Ceiling master SINGLE 6500 0.72 Ceiling light -full cutoff 70 watt MH F: 631.661.0486 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 P. 631.368.3324 Luminalre Location Summary Numeric Summary F. 631.368.1524 Project; Al Projects Project: All Projects REVISIONS: SegNo Label Z Label ColcType Units Avg Mox Min as,~war 1 Ceiling master 10 Parking Lot Illuminance F. 2.02 10.4 0.0 Date Description No. 2 Ceiling master 10 Stray Light Illuminance F. 0.05 0.6 D.0 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 Ceiling master 10 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE r INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 4 Metro -2 10 Ken Greene 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS 5 Metro -2 10 MagniFlaod Inc 0.0 0.0~ D.0 0. .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,1 0.1 °.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF 7200 New Horizons Blvd SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. e Metro -2 10 North Amityville, NY 11701 T 631-225-1000 J 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD F 631-226-4444 I,I 7 Metro -2 10 E mail Kenny®magniflood.com 0.0 / . 0.0 010 0.1 on 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 on 0.1 0.0 0.0 o.0 o,0 0.0 0,0 0,o 0.0 0.0 COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 W ww.Magnifl0od.corn B Metro -2 10 Date.2/B/2010 uys .0 0.0 / .0 0. 0 0.1 D.1 0.2 0,2 0,2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0,1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 yi 9 Metro -2 10 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 di 10 Metro -2 10 10.0 0 0.0 0 D.1 146.00 a.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a.0 0.0 11 Metro -2 10 b b b 9. 9. 9. 9, 9, 9.. 9 9a 9 9. 9. 9, 9.. 9. 9. 9. b b 9i b 9i 2/10/10 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 0.0 0. 0.1 b 9. b b a b L b b 9. 9. L b b L b 9+ b b b b 9a 9, 0.1 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 COMMENTS DATED 12/08/09 12 Metro -2 10 13 Metro -2 10 / 9. b 9. b 9 b b 11105110 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 0.0 0.1 0.1 1 SEMR7 ELE . , 0.2 0.1 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 COMMENTS DATED 8106110 14 Pavlllon-3 15 J2 a R. . b 7 1. 9a aM 9,1 b b 9. b _x'~V . 9a 9. b 9w . 9w a j.j x a N 0.0 / 3 0.1 0.1 AL BUILDING AR 0,1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0,0 LIST OF DRAWINGS: 15 Pavlllon-3 15 / ° . b 9. 9., 9 b (CONVENIENCE STORE AREA= 2275 S.F.) 9 ifi Pavlllon-3 15 o~ 97 9. 9. b A 9 9. 9. 0 D D.2 - - - - - % i D.2 0.1 D,0 D.0 D.0 Sheet Description 0 9" b 9.. 9.7 9 9 . b / \ 1t9A/IIYG/ 9. b s a 9i . b J!y 9,~ ' b 9. 4- SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN 0.0 0.0 00.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0,0 0.0 -PARKING CALCULATIONS 97 9. w 9 ? 9. ~ -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 0.0 0.1 10. 2 10. 1 0.a 10. 0 0.0 0.1 w 9w b 685 PO ADDITION -SANITARY CALCULATIONS e 9. 0b 1. 9. 9. 9 b b . b 16 9. 97 y/9n l6./9~ a b ~i -ZONING ANALYSIS .0 .0 J .0 J .0 0 9. 97 9.7 5. 9 9 /arm[ / / 9a b 0.2 0.1 0.0 0,0 SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN a a ~W b b! b b 9, b 9 b 4 b 9a b b 9a b 9. L L 6 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE o 0.0 .0. r a 0.0 0. Mtt1 0.~ y~ 9w1 . 47 9. Si 9~ 9. b b b b b b 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 ~ a a LANDSCAPE NOTES 7 9. b b b 9 97 b b 9. 9. 0 0. /_`c0 . Sao y§1 10. 2 0,1 00 0,0 o 9a 9,7 M 9a 6. b '6 9\ 4 9 9 9 A 9 9b 9 ' 9~P SP-3 -SITE DETAIL IF `r 'C 9. b b 9 b 9. b 9a b b b b b 9a b b b b b b b 9,. 97 9w SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN b'.0 .{1O 0 .{1O ~ 0 0. ^ Si b 9. 9. 9w 16 9a 9: b 9a 9a 96 9. b E7 9a 9: b '8a 9. 9a 9a b 9. L 9M ~A•3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 h SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY h ,~ttJ 9a 1. b 9a 9a b 9a 9a b 9u 9a b 9" 9a 9. b b 9a 9u b b 9. 9w S %7 17 9. D.0 3 0 D.O 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 'DO • 9~ 9 b b b b b 9s 9a b b b b 9w b 9. 9w 1 PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 97 b b 9i 9i 97 00.0 0.1 0,1 0.0 G ^ / ~.0 0 0. 0.0= A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS b 9 b 9 9 b b b 9 L 9 9a 9• 'd. 9. 97 3 9.i _ 9. b.o b.o .0 0.0 0.z 0.1 0.0 0.0 °.0 .0 0.0 ~.I~: t & & 'Ar ( 9.• 7 1• . 5 1x 9x 9x , 9w % 1. `L 9 x 9. 9. H-L •LAJ1 AND Wt;STL{LEVAMONS A 1 'b A: Ai b b 1. 1. x 4. Sr b . 17 1 9. b 9x %a L b 9° These plans are an IneW mant of 0 0.o b.o 0.04 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0,0 ° ,0 service and are the property of the Engineer. Irddngements wlti be prosecuted. 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b 9.1 ^ 9. b b 9: a b o.o 0.0 0.0 U b I 9. .5 an 0.0 0.0 ° .o .:?irr,:i:~: 1i A• 1. b • b 9a b 9. 9a 1 b dO15 Contractors shell ve ft all field 1^.~cA'.~T.tl~~v?h~~,UP'yY ~tIY."~NY[3{`4' i.y )a b b b b b conditions and dimensions and C.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 P0.0 NEW TURF UOLNY B p A'~"~ C 0 S L K 9w 9a b C IDEWAL0.0 0.0 shall be responsible for field M and queltiy of work No abwences - Y ~ RAYfO shall be made on behati of the Contractor for anyenor or neglect SEAL y~~~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OBL ....OW 4NE 0.0 0.0 •0.0 0¢ 0.0 0.0 0.0 orOUNE 0.0 0. 0.3 0.4 A ° ,0 W~ on his pert Project - n q WHITE LINE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WHI DNE A OTN MAT'_L1' N ~ 9./s RZ 0.E5) 0.1 0.T 0.1 0.1 0.T 0,T 0.0 0.0 0.a 0.0 - N o UU N M.tiITE LINE OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, i 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. T U R I D N E 0.0 '.0 0.0 D. 0.0 .0 D. 0.1 OB .0 0. U" 0.0 .0 OA OBL YELLOW LINE INC. L OW E 0.0 . .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NEW 0.00 0 E ° . 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0,0 320 FROST POND ROAD OLD BROOKVILLE,NY o.0 0.0 0.a 0.o b.o b.o D.o 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~t '~lUP ~OP 0 0 M 0 PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. STOP LINE NOTE; MAIN RD. & FACTORY ~O G( THERE ARE NO B CUTS RUNNING UTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE AVENUE 1J ADJACENT P 0 RTY BETWEEN SIGSB TWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE LANE MATTITUCK, NY FOR WO] FOR WORK ON STATE HIGHWAY AND Ti~R~nAFFIC TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SEE "ROADWAY SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP = R"RiO~VTJ R"ROVENENT PLANS FOR NYS ROUTE 25" 44.1 DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT BY DUNI BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC. 1000 142 01 27 ~V Date: 4.13.09 drawing no. ~7 ALL 9TE INF A BDRYEY DAZED ALL 91E INFORMARON IS BASED UPON Scale: AS NOTED p H 1 A SDFYEY DAZED D 02 M/1a/01, JOB NO. 06013. BY: _ 1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ~YOLL~~ ~YOLL~~` ~ ~BRUSN SCALE: I" = 201-0" 0 xo sus wort ww~ iYE MXMIXY.„lul>I~ Drawn by: DLS DEC-62010 J I~ i NEN DEC NEW 54"SO.x 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA KEMPEY ENGINEERING NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF NEW FACIA BOARD EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW SIGN LIGHTS WITH SHINGLES ROOF SHINGLES TO NEW FACIA NEW NATURAL NEW 7-11 WOOD MATCH ADDITION BOARD SPLIT SHAKES CARVED WALL ANGLE REFLECTOR 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY AT ALL CABLES SIGN SEE DET.3 EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION P: 631.321.7777 F: 631.661.0486 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EXIST. BLDG. W/ D EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW NEW FACIA BOARD 1 En C TO MATCH ~-I O MATCH ADDITION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 L- ADDITION T- i V, ~n FACIA BOARD TO P. 631.368.3324 F. 631.368.1524 EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW HARDIPLANK 1;a SIDING IN LIGHT EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW GRAY TONE HARDIPLANK SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY TONE REVISIONS: NEW 4" PRECAST CONC. LEDGE NEW 4" PRECAST CONC. LEDGE Date Description No. Y 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS 00 DATED 03/13/08 H T- NEW B" NEW 6" CONC. CURB 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE 3 CONC. CURB I INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GRADE l EL I GRADB W MAIN ENTRANCE DOORWAY NEW HARDIPLANK NEW PICTURE WINDOWS W/ WHITE TRIM 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF NEW 10" SQUARE DECORATIVE NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, NEW MAIN ENTRAN t COLUMNS WITH 12" SQUARE NANTUCKET STYLE WITH W/ TRANSOM WINI TRANSOM WINDOW ABOVE SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY & SOL DIVIDED LIGHT PANELS TYP. SOUTHOLD PLANNING D STONE BASE, TYP. ® ALL 7 LOC. PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. TONE ALL NEW WINDOW LOC. 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD STRIPE STANDARDS - STANDARD COLORS 3M FILM MATE I FILM MATERIAL COMMENTS DATED 7/22109 A-RED C- GREEN 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 368053 (CARDINAL RED) 368058 (DARK GREEN) i COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 EQUIVALENT PMS # 1797 EQUIVALENT PMS # 342 2 A-1 SCALE: 1/4" = P-0" AVERY # 10836-7-11 RED AVERY # 10835-711 GREEN SEEN LIST OF DRAWINGS: B-ORANGE D- WHITE 3623 (BRIGHT ORANGE) Sheet Description EQUIVALENT PMS # 165 E-BRONZE SP-1 XEY MAP -SITE PLAN AVERY # 10837-7 11 ORANGE PANTONE 19-1118 -PARKING CALCULATIONS -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS B OA -SANITARY CALCULATIONS -ZONING ANALYSIS 00 J SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN - - -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE LEVEn 0 N N -LANDSCAPE NOTES _ cn SP-3 -SITE DETAIL A D 00 SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTING PLAN E C A D SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY NEN -0" 3'-6" NEW 54"SO.x 76"H PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DEC DECORATIVE CUPOLA 101-L111 A- L -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS 7_11 Will WATT. CTrW A-2 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW EXIST, BLDG. W/ NEW _ o ROOF SHINGLES TO ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION MATCH ADDITION Then plans plans are an IneWmsnt of service and as the property of the Engineer. IMdnpements will be prosecded. Contractors shall vedfy all laid conditions and dimensions and shag be responsible for field a and G EXIST. BLDG. W/ EXIST, BLDG, W/ NEW quality of worlc No allowances shelf ~beJ made on behalf of the NEW FACIA BOARD 11 Hill 11 1 11 1 FACIA BOARD TO MATCH ADDITION Conbachor for anysmoror negled TO MATCH ADDITION on his pad SEAL GAMA DEER PARK, EXIST. BLDG. W/ INC. NEW HARDIPLANK EXIST, BLDG. W/ NEW 'q SIDING IN LIGHT R GRAY TONE HARDIPLANK SIDING IN 320 FROST POND ROAD LIGHT CRAY TONE OLD BROOKVILLE,NY NEW SERVICE ENTRACE DODR 7-ELEVEN, INC. Y MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY NEW NEW 6° CONC. CURB CONC. CURB SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP GRADS GRADE WNZORT11 VATION SEC. BLK. LOT 142 01 27 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. AS NOTED Animal LE: fia^ = I -o. M.C. DEC-62010 i, i NEW 54"SO,x 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA KEMPEY ENGINEERING 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 SIGN LIGHT WITH SHINGLES ANGLE REFLECTOR MATCH ADDITION P: 631.321.7777 i NEW NATURAL F: 631.661.0486 SPLIT SHAKES I AT ALL GABLES EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE y I ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 P. 631.368.3324 NEW 7-11 WOOD U CARVED WALL SIGN BEYOND F. 631.368.1524 EXIST, BLDG. W/ NEW FACIA BOARD TO NEW FACIA BOARD NEW HARDIPLANK MATCH ADDITION REVISIONS: SIDING IN LIGHT EXIST, BLDG, W/ NEW GRAY TONE _ HARDIPLANK SIDING IN NEW 10' SQUARE DECORATIVE COLUMNS LIGHT GRAY TONE Data Description No. WITH 12" SQUARE STONE BASE, TYP. 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 Y ALL 7 LOC. NEW 4" PRECAST TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS CONCRETE LEDGE DATED 03/13/08 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 6 NEW 6" CONC. CURB RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE yyyyyy NEW fi" CONC. I~ CURB BEYOND INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GRADE GRADE FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. " NANTUCKET STYLE WITH V 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 I, 3 EAST ELEVATION A-2 SCALE: 1/4" = P-0" LIST OF DRAWINGS: Sheet Description SP-1 -KEY MAP -SITE PLAN -PARKING CALCULATIONS .DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS -SANITARY CALCULATIONS -ZONING ANALYSIS SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE NEW 54"SO.x 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA -LANDSCAPE NOTES SP-3 SITE DETAIL SP- TRUCK ROUTING PLAN EXIST, BLDG. W/ NEW NEW ROOF NEW GOOSENECK SP-6 -AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY ROOF SHINGLES TO SHINGLES SIGN LIGHT WITH MATCH ADDITION ANGLE REFLECTOR PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN III II I I I II II I I II II I I II III II II I I II I II II U II A-1 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS NEW NATURAL SPLIT SHAKES A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS AT ALL GABLES A I EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF These plane are an leatrumerd of service and are the property of the 6 SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION Engineer. Inhingements will be NEW 7-11 WOOD preeeculed. CARVED WALL 11 11 Hill lill SIGN BEYOND Conbactore shall verlfy all Add oondlions and dlmanslons and shall be responsible forfleld fit and EXIST. BLDG. W/ T qually of work No alowanoes e4 NEW FACIA BOARD NEW HARDIPLANK NEW FACIA BOARD shall be made on behalf of the TO MATCH ADDITION SIDING Contractor for anyerror or neglect NEW 10" SQUARE on his part SEAL EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW HARDIPLANK DECORATIVE COLUMNS GAMA DEER PARK, SIDING IN LIGHT WITH 12" SQUARE STONE BASE, TYP. GRAY TONE ALL 7 LOC. ;T INC. 1 NEW 4" PRECAST _ NEW 4" PRECAST CONCRETE LEDGE CONCRETE LEDGE 320 FROST POND ROAD OLD BROOKVILLE,NY NEW 6" CONC. NEW B" CONC. CURB 7-ELEVEN, INC. CURB BEYOND GRADE GRAD MAIN RD. & FACTORY NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, NANTUCKET STYLE WITH PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP SEC. BILK. LOT 4 4 WEST ELEVATION 142 01 27 A-2 scALE: v4" =1 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. AS NOTED Asssm2, M.C. oFC 6 2010 I~ 0 LASER FICHE FORM 0 Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPRe Type: Approved Project Type: Site Plans Status: Final - Pending Inspection SUM 1000 -142.-1-27 Project Name: Seven Eleven - Mattituck Address: 9945 NYS Route 25. Mattituck Hamlet: Mattituck Applicant Name: GAMA Properties Deer Park, Inc., c/o GAZ Realty Owner Name: GAMA Properties Deer Park, Inc. Zone 1: B ~l Approval Date: 12/13/2010 ~ o'~~l ~ f 1 I OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related infwmation End SP Date: 2/15/2011 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: located on the n/e comer of Factory Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SC Filing Date: CandR's: Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: i SCANNED j i F E B 2 7 2011 JJ SCAN Date: 1 Records Management t r• y v r a ")mgr • m~ . - l F. ri t, _ _ _ ~ v- i w. ~ -.;.V.. ~ ~ ~ yy r ~ i ~ 4M l r a. 41 1 t T yy i J ! ~4~t t7 f. f « lz My~ ~y _ Al. f f hr Ml Ilk f ~L_ -•'Car ~ .s ~ _vfxlra .t~yVF ~~~f - ~ ~ ~ t (rp s~~. ~-su 'Fr !1'60W JEW - ; 1, : ir{'• - ~ - S Y ~ r" ,Y I r 1. t • J.y . L ~ " r ~ I I KT . , I " ~ 1 ~ , i~J` ~ 1 ~ • ~ 1 , - i ei~ r- au "WY MAF. 3 f. t ~ .l e;• 'r I I C~ t r' ~ i FACTORY AVE ,M I ' or Ift JL_ 14 i L 4 ~ ~ fr ~ 41 ..,_C\ t r- VISA 1 1 -..R= ~ ~ 11 11 7- 1 i+' - r 4 r r L ' i71 rY.~ Y y i IN 40 ~•~ir , ..,,x^'_^- ..`~c1;:~ Sul ITT b. ~ ' ~ ~ Jam" ~ - ~ L ~ . ~=P's~~~•r"~~ ~ w. 4 3 .L.~ ~~•11. ~ 1F ~l_ 1 1 f ~ 11 1 NOW ~i r, _ • ~ • ..r._.. --s . ¦ s:-~ - ..s _ ~ - ~ ~ - '3• Y _ waldbaums v pop; mm- IRF 4 r~ - KEMPEY ENGINEERING AREA NAME AREA SIZE CODE REQ. REQUIRED PROPOSED ;E SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS REQUIRED DRAINAGE CONVENIENCE STORE T2,670 SQ.Fi. 1 SPACE/200 SQ.FT. 14 SPACES 24 SPACES 2858 CU.FT. / 68.37 CF/VF = CF/VF = 41.81 V.F. AREA AREA DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN T( J TOTAL 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY * INCLUDING'(2) HANDICAP PARKING SPACE EXISTING DRAINAGE FLOW FLOW FLOW FL FLOW BY WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 SPACE: P: 631.321.7777 SITE DATA (3) ® 10' DIA. X 8' DEEP = 3 DEEP = 3 x 8' = 24 V.F. NAME SIZE SANITARY: GREY: TOTAL: Sf )E CONVENIENCE 2,670 0.03 gpd/sf 0.02 gpd/sf 0.05 gpd/sf ITEM AMOUNT % PROVIDED DRAINAGE /St 134 gdp F: 631.661.0486 ~ DEkP = 3 x 8' = 24 V.F. STORE SF =80 gdp =54 gdp =134 gdp 1 PLOT SIZE 24,140 SQ.FT. 100 (3) 10' DIA. X 8' DEF~ = 3 (0.55 ACRES) TOTAL DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR STORM WATER RUN-OFF RETENTIO1 TENTION 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE BUILDING AREA 2,670 SQ.FT. 11.06 48 V.F. EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 AREA RUN-OFF COEFF. FT. OF RAIN CU.Fi•RETENTION F TENTION REQ'D P. 631.368.3324 PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK/CURB AREA 13,584 SQ.FT. 56.27 TOTAL LANDSCAPING/ BUFFER 7,637 SQ.FT. 31.64 PAVEMENT 13,584 SQ.FT. 0.9 0.17 2079 CU.F o~ ~079 CU.FT. F. 631.368.1524 AREA " LANDSCAPE 7,637 SQ.FT. 0.25 0.17 325 CU.FT 325 CU. FT. UNDEVELOPED AREA 0 SQ.FT. 0 m BUILDING 2,670 SQ.FT. 1.0 0.17 454 CU.FT 454 CU. FT. REVISIONS: DEDICATED AREA (INCL. SOME 249 SQ.FT. 1.03 LANDSCAPE AREA) I 2858 CU.FT !858 CU.FT. Date Description No. k '858 CU. FT. 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 ZONING INFORMATION 4a / mom N/F TOTAL 24,140 SQ.FT. 2858 CU.FJ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS MATTTUCK PLAZA LLC %17.95 SITE LO Tt DATED VI ED3AS PER COMMENTS & 3 TE LOCATION 03/02/09 RE SCTM#'S:m STREET ADDRESS: 9945 MAIN ROAD, MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NY W~ RE A EXISTING e" CONCRETE GGENERAL BUSINESS (B) %n7s %n.41 %1es2 ZONING DISTRICT: B-GENERAL BUSINESS WALL RETAINING ALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER WALL ALONG NORTHERLY g RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE TOTAL AREA OF SUBJECT LOT: 24,140 SQ,FT. (0.55 ACRES) 1.13 PROF PROPERTY LINE A S P H A L T P A R K I N G MT adiePd_' A!' y P WW 'N INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOTAL LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED: 2,670 SQ,FT. 21.100 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF LANDSSCAPEAAREAA REQQIRED'S4j828QSQ.FT. 356 3 J?m LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED: 7,637 SQ.FT. 31~ 4%) N 48'~ f ff BC 1 46.00 %16.80 ~dS0d ~N 48 57 30 E ! SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. LANDSCAPE FRONT YARD REQUIRED: 2 414 SQ,FT. n ExIST. .bm 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD LANDSCAPE FRONT YARD PROPOSED: x,770 SQ.FT. n~' S OMTE PROF PROP. 1200 GAL. SHADE AREA INDIGMS PROP, 20' X 10' TRASH PROP,5 CU. TO. TRASH SEPTIC TANK GRADE TO BE FILLED IN. ENCLOSURk ON CONIC..I gAD CONTAINER (TYP.) E COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE REQUIRED TO BE IN FRONT YARD: 50% d PROP SEPT PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE PROPOSED TO BE IN FRONTYARD: 36.3% 0. POOL LOMPACT FILL MATERIAL LL x4 J9 EL 2370 EL 2 ] y Rt, ,,J 11 4eyW1 Ae'?IT, REP. 1000 4 'R? ~1 TO 05% MA%. DENSITY. -31 GUARDRAIL WITH GALLON GREASE PROP. BOLLARD T We"8,5 POST EVERY '1' ~l 14 I M FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 40'-0'„ / Mowgo m 1- 0 0 1- 0 0 0 o RAP (TYP.) 61-3, o.c. FT ww',r' " / SEWER ELEC. ? '/V 'V 11 b C 4 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD FRONT YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 77 -1 COMMENTS DATED 10`~~` ~ _ . SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 15'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 49'-2" UST u FNG /BC 24. /BC 24. 5 VENT MEIEfl % .4 1 ~f/' v v TC 2 90 ~ ak,~~,r 1 ~ ~c = REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 25'-0 BC 22,1 1J BC 2 40 N TC 24.90 ~MH EL. PROPOSED TOTAL BC 24.40 I REAR YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 21'-8' L,IS TC C~MH EL. 23.70 CONVENIENCE STORE ~ 5h II.l~ - ~_~kI~ 49 23.70 / cnarasm TC 25.19 "lnmrw ors BC 24.69 C iD 25.19 AREA (2,670 SF) RETAININN PROP, GG WALL ALL r'y 1 T C 2 .1 9 C SEE J \ I mA 11M. or W DET. ON SP-3 y A %1825 %17.7s LIST OF DRAWINGS: nua 2 / 2009 C SHADED AREA INDICATES I T. 0 5.3 CURRENT USE: GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE L'N 5R / gaTrt"Ba a I'I~ , I GGRRAADET FILL FILLED IN, / /1 11, ^1' t MOMSEY KEP .01) ^O / 10.0 TO 95% MkK DENSITY. " ~wyx~ Sheet Description PROPOSED USE: 7-ELEVEN CONVENIENCE STORE T sa c /9y /v a D. P. / M P5 NA COMPACT v „r•, . A.,. na { 64 f PROP' T!6,"2^~/ CARS ONLY (STY 3) ' SP-1 -KEY MAP . BC 22.8 E:%IST. CCVE 685 F. PR POSED ADDITION i ~u 3"9 A s P H A L PARKING 2 KEY M" •SITEPLAN E'L. 2,61 J TC 25.00 SP-1 -PARKING CALCULATIONS n° 371 (22.86) TI B • / / / BC 244.5 .50 -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PiMO~xcw.r C 24.36 LEGEND 1 iL/- / 24.36 24.7 T 24.7 RO "ATM" SANITARY CALCULATIONS 24.2 8 24.2 NO W SIG TC 24,74 EXISTING 6" CONCRETE RETAINING WALL ALONG EASTERLY PROPERTY TC = TOP OF CURB € C 2~s~i LIG11T W . 0. © IBC 24.24 o LINE TO BE MODIFIES -ZONING ANALYSIS Q riwroEyEp o ,a M rv REQUESTED CON CT 61 / CROSS ACCESS IF RE Q IRED STRIPE SITANDARDS ~ STANDARD CCLOR53M FILM MATT IS 3M FILM MATERIAL SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN BT = BOTTOM OF CURB TC 25.00 BC 24.50 1 / i ~ ~ t m rvy T(` 24.75 EL = ELEVATION Abu , m BC 24.25 1 %A-RED C- GREEN •LANDSCAPESCHEDULE EXIST. Z, I ~l PR P. T.O,G. PROP. "7-11" WOOD CARVED T-31 GUARDRAIL WITH / WBxB.5 POST EVERY 3680-53 (CAIRDINAL RED) 368058 (DARK GREEN) 1EENJ LANDSCAPE NOTES ¦ = MONUMENT x BUILDING A, C) a~ ~m (2) p%16TG. INL WALL SIGN W/ GOOSENECK („I 6'-3•O.C. EQUIVALENT PMS#1797 EQUIVALENT PMS#342 DT \ C EL. 2275 \ucHTINC 7 .o L P i iGREEN LIGHTING NOTES .75 0E L _ DRAINAGE FLOW BC 24.501 TC 244.75 F LOCATION AVERY # 101636.7-11 RED AVERY # 10835.711 GREEN - - - '~C11~ B-ORANGE D-WHITE OF FUTURE CROSS 3623 BRIGHT ORANGE SP-3 -SITE DETAIL = UTILITY POLE y V o m BC 24.25 \ / y ~E • L HT ILfOT 27) OF EE (BRIGHT ORANGE) PROP. T.O.G. C 2325 ACCESS SS TO ADJACENT EQUIVALENT PMS # 185 E-BRONZE .Jul PT FI 29 RA PROPERTY nvcova ~nPazT AK fIPANAF PANTf1NF 1u-111R - NF t NFW P.nnSFfJFrX SIGN A I XT .DTT_T AATTI Ol TT ITT TT/A TT ITO L ? g+ g 17 LP [ uoLxT[o Exlsr. Ouwnow,u To Tc 20.02 LIC LIGHT WITH ANGLE A-1 '11vl\l11 A 11 0V V 111 a:i.a: vAA aviva I \ o N~~ ~ 1'3 P~AR~%INO ONLY ptt. 2t) BE REMOVED Rf I REFLECTOR PROP. 9 PROP. STACKED 25.0 TC 24.0 TC 23.25 \rlmPOSen TO 20.40 DA1 M: SGS- N V D 1727 EE-EDLEVENETAVIONIUMEN SIGN BC 2470 c 22.75 sicx N01 fMER RETAINING WALL SEE N[ 24 70 BC 23 90 ^'f5~ IcHr ~ OEr, ON SP-3 Pf NEw z /4" THICK WOOD A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS IT MO PANEL- WHITE- IMTH CARVED 7-I 151GNAGE WITHIN PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN OP ry '25.96 n FOR SNNRE6NRMHOrv b• ~LJ V nlroPOEEn II BC 223.50 3.00 7" LIGHT UGHT BC 23.00 wxoxc war" m a,A'.}dy .y'q::r.1 n y~ RMIU9 WRENS.. LIGHT H 2 1 LIGHT 2554 - 8466% x24.04 BW 2b'.08 9W 19'.7O U(~ ~m I ER1511N0 CUB pR IG .0 % E%I mu TO ENDINCGz os B A Nf % NEW 10" 5QUARE WOOD These plans are an Instrument of °~EEmx°SEEE °rE i S 48'57'30" N I1261.1~'g ` &C f EL 24.64 % EL 2632 1 98.0 EL 4, 22. 0 5730" W vorxs % 22.51 "G"'C' 1KKGN E0.Vx p s( COLUMNS- WHITE- WITH 12" serv ice and are the property of the 5QUARE STONE BA5E, TO Engineer. Infringements will be C N 310Y gIEIf,L 4.29 MOPK3E0 LILL2420O' % EL 2264 TO 21.01 ncN mm Puocx z - % L 22et p M' n MATCH BUILDING prosecuted. iC 25.71 TO 26.10x % 5E%IST. GOING SO WALK 24.52 WALK 24.52 Meow. ] d x n11LPO5EY kEEP onEOYm[ax 4rt . R5 0,04p115YB UP34 NYT344 mart S,NK, SON. N E .50 E Contractors shall vedfy all field TC 26.56 5ENM0 M~ER BC 26.23 25 0 1s209.S' .bT ENISi 5 1 I 0%IST. MR_1 condltlons and dlmenslons and 26.95 25.39 T 1TTEfl ESC 2450 H 1. 81.6eCOV TO 20.a2 t:'>',•:a,'• 4;fi<hP.: Sbldai' " I shall be responsible for field fit and z P1 WHI)L+ LINE ENTRY BE 21151x 2'14 0 Y TO 24.0) 2 fil LINE B 23.65 C 2]196 C 22.22 ATE ® C BE 20.84 y quallty of work. No allowances 20.4] . PlwwfTp R n 2. 5) P__ shall be made on behalf of the Contractor for enyerror or neglect OBL YELLOW LINE x u WHITE LINE 26.1 O R _ - _ WAI LINE 21.29 20' 9. (WIDTH VApIEBJ -ROAD - CODER MA-a n ° S.R. 25) cLaSEsfo SON a NC an his part. SEAL % - 24.96 # N 24.96- 24.04 23 25 W NEW'ELDORADO' STONE, NANTUCKET 5TYLE WITH Project WHITE LINE 26.92 o %26.2 T U R N I N G L A N E DSL ELLO LIN PF PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. T( TO MATCH BUILDING m SiW LIRNETKro SET OBI- YELLOW LINE RETHE .SCWNOOATE MR L L YE OW L IE 21.53 OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, INC. Kn ESTRW1 OWSSWILK .41 (NY500T R.O,W,) %204e (ROUTE 25) 320 FROST POND ROAD 26.23 26,03 WRITE LINE 2441 (VARIABLE WIDTH) PL PLANTER AREAS ON EACH OLD BROOKVILLE,NY 26.26 TC 26, 31 TC 26.09 iC 25.95 66 2569 SIC 5.56 GO 25 54 TG 25.J2 TO 24.53 51 5IDE Of 51GNAGE (61-41 x 8" C IOURS C 2162 g)G 2616 Ef BC 24.06 CONC CURB sf• EACH) 4UP UP 0 O b R\ 6 6 Nf PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. NEW'ELDORADO' STONE, NANTUCKET 5TYLE MAIN RD. & FACTORY STOP LINE `PwrosRG wo urr I Ni (1 ain 1Nf IIMmvW. DID - AVENUE NOTE: THERE ARE NO CURB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE DR THE PF PRECA5T CONCRETE CAP MATTITUCK, NY ADJACENT PROPERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE LANJE Nf i P/ J NEW 2 1/4" THICK WOOD SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP PANEL- WHITE- WITH CARVED DIST. SEC. BILK. LOT J _4,,/ 7- 7-1 1 51GNAGE WITHIN r 1000 142 01 27 r 0 J 7-1 1 WOOD STREET SIGN ~A SIGN W1 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no, ti 3 (0005ENfCK FIX- URE E 6~SIC~AE." ~`l SP- 1 SCALE: 3/8" = I'-O" A p Scale: AS NOTED - 1 A SURVEY AM OAlEO 02/16/W, ,qB M NO. ro A SO OfOLI 9Y; 11 E IfFkXO-WO %gll Yf TIM Ilil[E ;~i~ Drawn by: M.C. 5 4:\Main\Autocod\Abi Zeid George - Southold Car Wash\7-11 PLAN. BD.CI2-24-09\7-29-C19\7-251-09-2.(Iwg, 8/21/2609 4:16:36 PM, XES Syneryix H825 (1 Roll).pc3 II ,0. .PA nn4xuP._ Xm P,.. NO rw I??J'~i Af tl LANDSCAPING NOTES : KEMPEY ENGINEERING 1. COVERALL PLANTING BEDS WITH A MINIMUM OF 2" THICKNESS OF HARDWOOD MULCH. . L Mme" •~-A r IS •~I~'n"[••I~Oi G ••rlr .r1 ••WN[5{lAl eA. MAIL OF STAK10 TZ 2. AT PLANTING BEDS IN PARKING AREAS AND AREAS OF REQUIRED TRAFFIC VISIBI= USE LOW PROFILE PLANTINGS. PLANTINGS. Mxd IXX_i i I.1rILM X.[[X VCL /rv••~I,L'R, pA ~IWIN YJINi R._ LI .I~ 3. DURING LOCAL GROWING SEASON, OWNER SHALL PURCHASE AND PLANT ANNUAL FLOWERING PLANTS AS REQUIRED IN I 1S REQUIRED IN PLANTING BEDS TP r _ ~ i ~ 1~ - [MITE 11A1. LPL I ~J-AL~ fl ~ Ir1 CLOSE GAPS IN PLANTING AREAS AND TO ADD COLOR AND VARIETY TO LANDSCAPING. 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY ' I i 4. PROVIDE NEW IN-GROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT ALL REAR OF LANDSCAPING AS REQUIRED BY CODE. WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 yy11xxyy,,F"^`~ W ~ I 1 f~ 9;1410X[WIIPO'M 'w~ _ _ I.IK9 L 5. STREET TREES. STREET TREES WITH A MINIMUM CALIPER OF POUR INCHES SHALL HE PLANTED AND/OR MAINTAINED ADJ UINTAMI) AD'ACENTTG ALL pf~Nw~AR'rTP I L9.._ _ { 1 W.'tttP WF A r_. ~'I ROAD FRONTAGES IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 30 FEET ON CENTER [ AMENDED 2-10-2004, EFFECTIVE 3-1-20041 TER P: 631.321.7777 s~.lil"III-T~I•.alA„.1.,9L 11=I1~PPIa i 5TAILP!M' u 4EAER SPEC. 6. PARKING AREA SCREENING. ALL PARKING AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH A HEDGE, BERM AND/OR DECOR (AMIOR DECORATIVE WALL OR F: 631.661.0486 DENSE TRUE PLAKINd TEE AaANBK X KIMEAr sN!LS ° Ea!P!am . VIT '"x^ La nA . C " FENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS. 7. DECORATIVE OFF-STREET PARKING LOT LIGHTS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPL ED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. AINED. i Ertl ufmwPLxAm~X„,6 8. OFF-STREET PARKING LOT LIGHT PICTURES SHALL BE NONADJUSTABLE HORIZONTALLY MOUNTED FIXTURES WITH LESS JRES WITH LEES THAN 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE rv^RWI NINETY-DEGREE LUMINARRE CUTOFF. u VuYW... n • .qt uL ..Awe vR.......y \ q / A V[V'I. Lll~irl(X .yam./ ' FIXTURES THAT PROJECT LIGHT OR GLARE TOWARD THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ADJOININGPROPERTIESSHALL NOT B IESSHALL NOT HE PERMITTED. EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 `•n nfm 9. PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ALONG PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS) U4 WALKWAYS AND ALLEYWAYS. P. 631.368.3324 E!.dKAreo sluE nr .uxow 0.AxxN I=1L-~ ~"'~i~.u~5_.... uw.em me Mon. - 10. BUILDING-MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE FOR SAFETY OR SIGNAGE PURPOSES ONLY AND MUST DIRECT LIGHT DO) WALL PACK LIGHTS OR OTHER LIGHTING THAT SHINES OUTWARD TOWARD ADJOINING PROPERTIES OR THE STREET RAGE RIECT LIGHT DOWNWARD. F. 631.368.1524 'HE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY an.IP.rt+PN+.X. yr,XOLx aI WHE HMT U08 RANIIK - \ f1111n rlli /i ARfTIW.F 9NIN4 AFA _ ASO,dL9 .N JMq! - SHALL BE PROHIBITED. SHIELDING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO AVOID LIGHT TRESPASS AND GLARE. m~ GR~'2'WgP .mom 11. DECORATIVE STREETLIGHTS OF NOT MORE THAN 12 FEET IN BRIGHT SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED, INSTALLED AND ITALLBD AND ! : -roar ! X xNAVPb wtr.._.. MAINTAINEDSITUATED IN SIDEWALK CUTOUTS EVERY 30 FEET ON ' ar lennwn yI' 11 CEN'T'ER ALONG THE SITE'S FRONTAGE. THE SAME LIGHTING FIXTURE SHALL BE APPLIED TO EACH MAIN STREET HUSINE: STREETHUSINESSDLSTRICT. REVISIONS: - YIPNIYIIi .__.Se.ek!,,......,--. _i uw NSF Date Description No. Yu MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC 17, IF-'IaI! 10/10/OS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS 2 3 TL- Tl "MlPL,,BnA~~~~1L-=ff~=~ DATED 03/13/08 TC 18 73 ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) aC 16.32 USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE x A,MT w1WU _ I.1M{p .ILII i.w~.A.14X14 wUAn R!LT. PlwIIK Il~i V~~_f.. .L„ INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD / LIL13 A S P H A L T P A R K I N G EXISLNG CONCRETE 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF / y^~^ RETNNING WALL 146.00 SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. EXIST. xmsm N 48'57'30" E 4 / GRATE - - _ - _ 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 EXISTING NATURAL VEGETATION LANDSCAPESCBEDULE / 0 O O O 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD KEY BOTANICALNAME COMMON NAMB S12E QUANTITY COMMENTS DATED7/29/09" 4 O PICEA RUBENS RED SPRUCE 4" min, cal.. 12 / ® r~r~ N 0 CUPRESSOCYPARIS LEYLORD CYPRESS 30" dim. 35 j i~ HT PROPOSED TOTAL L_ J L J ~ / CONVENIENCE STORE - - -I O3 LE000THOE RACEMOSA SWEETBELL LEUCOTHOE 4'-6'H IN O RRGP STACKED AREA 2,670 SE RETAINING NG WALL WALL SEE ® THUJA OCCIDENTALIS NIORA AMERICAN ARBORVITAE TH 23 ( W GET. ON SP-3 nL®® a cc LIST OF DRAWINGS: nue t 7 ,1 ~ - - - III O MINIPERUS CHINENSIS GOLD COAST JUNIPER IS"dia. I03 / //~~(ya2~ p~ Sheet Description 6 ALL ERISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN Al ,I- > ® \ ba 1 ~v T EUONYMUS ALATUS WINGED HUONYMUS 3'-5'H 9 I~ ® ~A/ POLE HGGNTEG CARS ONLY (QW. 3) SP-1 XEYMAr ® 685 SF. PR POSED ADDITION ~_-S-P'F ALT P A R K I N G -SITE PLAN Q PARKING CALCULATIONS LIM -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS -SANITARY CALCULATIONS ~4j ~Y 0 LIGHT -ZONING ANALYSIS oQ NYT140 ee 0 0 0 0 'S $m 00000000 SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN ryN v 0 J ® ~0 p 7-31 GGARGMIL WITH -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE EXIST, ® ® W 6'-60 5 P05 3- O.C. EvERv 6'-P LANDSCAPE NOTES BUILDING 9 m -LIGHTING NOTES SP-3 -SITE DETAIL lyy ~~~i m m®ee'ee0oe l~T A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS 'G9FTa7iwL m V/A TO 20A / lipm -SIT * * * d4 STCED E +4 t 4 1 ® UG DET. Orv SP-3 A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS pgIOP.T-ELVENS Nif Iiw' jt ® RETANINGAWKALL SEE TC 20.40 h TOP ID SIGN Q{T om PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN LIGHT LI T nN N'y p Nrv These plans are an Instrument of ~q GRA55/ GRASS/ TOP SOIL AND SEE ING p E%IST.6' BUSH E%IST.6' BUSH 98.00 EXIST. W TREE p p service and are the property of the _ Engineer. Infringements will be Q (D 8°57'3 W p EX19T.e BUS e EgsT.e' p ~ EXIST 10' BUSH TC 21.01 O .m prosecuted. TIC 26.58 TC 26.71 TO 26.10 EA . GONG SIOEWALK d015 4 Ntt344 Gw EXIST. SIGN 4 a r Contractors shell verify all fleid BC 26.23 OEOIG110N MR MURE NRNINE EbSi. ISLE COV C 0 K TG 20.82 conditions and dimensions and PMIK IMPPUrEMEMl6 P O iC x5.02 CONC CURB GUTTEq L+C1TIlY BC x460 iC x1.0) _ shall be responsible for fleid fit and BC x365 TC 23.36 TG 20.04 x WHITE LINE BC x2.92 Kf T.Ggg1E BC 20.43 quality of work. No allowances 08L YELLOW LINE shall be made on behalf of the Contractor for anyerror or neglect n J MAIN (WIDTH VARIES) ROAD (S. R. 25) WHITE UNE u WHITE LINE on his part. SEAL 0 0 N N N OBL LLO LIN MAIN Project MITE LINE TURNING LANE C M ONE TO BE SET STOP ACC0.0 MCN .ER . ELLOW ~~~/dI® I IN ROAD OBL Y LINE K19MOM1E R PE[ESIRW! WAL ALMMAY L YE Ow NE (NYSDOT R.O,W,) OWNER: GAMA_DEER PARK, INC. (ROUTE 25) 320 FROST POND ROAD TC 26.31 TC 28.019 TC 25.95 WHITE LINE (VARIABLE WIDTH) BC 25. 9 BC 25 6 BC 25.54 WNC CL TC 26.55 C 25.32 WNC CURB B 87 TO x4.53 OLD BROOKVILLE,NY 26.16 UP ~UP O w RC 24.06 .II Ip Ip CONE CURB PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. STOP LINE 1 I a L MAIN RD. & FACTORY ~O G'\ NOTE; AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY THERE ARE NO CURB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LE 1E ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE ` ADJACENT PROPERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD, AND MAI RD, AND MARLENE LANE Q SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP v DIST. SEC. BILK LOT e 1000 142 01 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. x r 44j "C--4 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN P-1 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" ALL STE I ALL SITE AMON IS BASED UPON N Scale: AS NOTED SP11111111111112, A SURVEY DATE A 6ORYEY DA GATED ED 02/ 02/16/0 JO6 NO. OBOIJ. 6T: ~YOLLA/E . S, 3 BRUSH ~YOLLh pW PO.-w $UT NO F NµM I.4AII' `wrEREE' Drawn b u..~ Y: M.C. Q:\Mnin\AUtocud\A6i Zeid Georye - Southold Car Wu:.,h\7-'11 PLAN. BD.02-24-09\7-29-09\7-29-09-2.clwy, H/21/20D9 4:16:12 PM, XES Syneryix 8825 (1 Roll).pc.3 fl 9ll m~ taa~sWw~:rvv.aiw.° Planting in accordance with KEMPEY ENGINEERING e'°;eirnoei.~i ' Sect. VII. Landscaping, Table nr VII - 3. E STEEL CAP .wheal and n m 13.arper hlgh Ol e z6" Cone. pab (rea bock !e high c9roconc. block fence oil - Inb,heunu thin °awN note 1) 40001b. - a ound. 28 da, sbength around. TEEL BOLLARD AARD G FILLED SOLID en° sax 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY ONCRETE, PRR4E INDUSTRIAL TYPICAL CONC. I a"a's, N°°7 s• . s' a to WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 INT (2) COATS E STREET REPAIR CURB GUTTER U- mcayen w wrthra' cover Cate pal (t 3' RYPJ EXTG ASPHALT SLATTED FABRIC DETAIL with slrtte Clene. kmp• AS R EDD(OR cenni NEW SLAB) with wrlleal dnvl 1-1/e' Tae Ao let. TYPICAL CONCRETE CURB °r n curb PLAN on- .1 «o°) P: 631.321.7777 at 1 F: 631.661.0486 Jed orer elan ni L.e _1/]' r Line poet GUTTER & STREET REPAIR NOTES: Imp amen u"° p0°' 1, - Length and width to be determined by the architect engineer as necessitated by the needs of the site. The slzl by the architect or by the architect or the site. The elze Is in Nw Turn. e[el e Yuam amn•r a it Unq Lin• hun nEi ie e as°w• W subject to the approval of the Town Engineer & Planning t 'eer Planning board. 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE p, PorlJnp N ~ EmEe oe• ra m• L. T-Ow DEEP 401 le, ze ss^mm~uusmos 2s EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 CONC. FOOTING to do ttrenvle roaem uMS.eemr .-W .I. CONCRETE e' P. 631.368.3324 F. 631.368.1524 INDUSTRIAL STANDARD STREET REPAIR CURB TYPICAL STREET CURBS GATES REVISIONS: STREET REPAIR DETAIL Date Description No. 1 TYPCIAL BOLLARD DETAIL 2 BUFFER FENCE AND PLANTING DETAI TG DETAIL s /4. REFUSE ENCLOSURE DETAIL 'TAIL 1 O/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 SP-3 NTS SP-3 SCALE: Z" = 1•-0" TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS SP-3 SCALE: 3 = 1t-0" SP-3 SCALE: 811 a 11.011 DATED 03/13/08 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. .w.m.tnm•w NOTES: relveT,.hYmmrd.r~ l.- Depth of stomge to be bawd oa dieWce between 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 11 phhhw~a u.Ytubq lowest invert & bottom ofeouctute. 2. -All structures sre to be raised to final grade ueng /rmwaY+Y.aulpq• appropriate solid or slatted ewer- See Section VI, fa 34° Bumper Disability Guide Cut II hmewvYhz°areh ne ss"..Xr Applications. 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNIIqG'BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/29/09 - II II rhxp~Yrepr~eap II ICLIpe'~ hY G A A e•Ynw V V HANDICAPPED e' wee tlripa INWA -rvA ao 4Y c ~ IwiYX "iO _ NOR I LIST OF DRAWINGS. 7 ~~oq li ,iv rwYXwnW1. I 1 YY~Ymilm Sheet Description - PARKING PLAN o F 7 SP-1 'KEY MAP - HANDICAPPED SIGN "bite an bide MAJOR TREE PLANTING BED 0 N N 'SITE PLAN -PARKING CALCULATIONS 4' wide blue stripe Allow 3" mWimum fie ullaummt P•weAGmm-Plaoldwa No. 694.D meppraved aqua m Blue ether g-D• rymbol Pot 8"uiafamcd hefiia benrmg deb to wry and. -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS i SlhntlaNtl Stall 8'-D' Dcceeelbllity I H-20 Wad wall mofgv opmivg. -SANITARY CALCULATIONS HantlleaPPed Stall TRAPFIC FL x°mai y~Y~Pe.~,eh -ZONING ANALYSIS I..MmIpM.NIDe YI f ®W TI ' wide rlripr (rep a-AUrtmr~el.lwwh.•m.wwr whhe..a..uw m II 11.17 ia-6"p'ryemivimmn- 4' OPenl ota I) xrevgwn.ete•npw couvealwu butwem busies-12"Pit, mmi - P.V.C.aComigeodMAW 12' Maximum 2 ma. SP-2 'LANDSCAPE PLAN 4000 W.-28 dry all W°a1Cm Vurl°bl• dl°m°t., o •LANDSCAPESCHEDULE -LANDSCAPE NOTES Oo NOTE: 9' wide rUlpe O ' Buld3ll wlW dam ~ T" ~ 8 13 1~~~ BLIIIRm.kdOl 1'-0" e5 uowd buw fic W0 depW. 1. - For two way lrallia, ~ 45' ids ea stripping to be yellow - TRAFFIC FLOW note 1) -LIGHTING NOTES Fot one woy traOle, pea etNpping to be while. 2W a., aku 11 a•1°wlaw•dleM SP-3 SITE DETAIL AllpleetiawP. pipetobe5DR35. j1. G..d water Il. A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS CAlsTTl1N A_A J ~ ua.,v ava~ a as >Ptmsh~ hi~) 7ON SITE STORM DRAINAGE POOL g LIGHT POLE DETAIL A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS s STRIPING DETAIL 6 MINOR TREE aswe ee for Major Treeexcept-eh0av he e01 SP-3 SCALE:" = I'-0" SP-3 SCALE: 4I.,= 1'-0" SP-3 NTS SP-3 SCALE: a' =1'-0" PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN These plans are an instrument of service and are the property of the Engineer. Infringements will be prosecuted. 1-s Contractors shall verify all field a conditions and dimensions and - shall be responsible for field fit ands'' quality of work. No allowances 20 12 O 0 shall be made on behalf of the Adlol"i"B e,vhoemdmum daps 1 1~mm~muhmm.iow "COMPACT PARKING Contractor for anyerrur or neglect on his part. .SEAL O ONLY" SIGN BEYOND Project T-31 GALV. METAL GWARDRAIL SYSTEM W/ WNER: GAMA DEER PARK, INC. Counter Slope of Surfaces Adjacent to Curb Ramps W(628.5 POST ® 6'-3" 'm 320 FROST POND ROAD NTS CAST IRON FRAME IAME O"C' TOP SOIL OLD BROOKVILLE,NY AND COVER TO GRADE U GRADE CAST IRON COVERS COPING STONE FRBSEMD GRADE FINISHED GRADE ROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. tw• 1 . 24^ 2'.4"ma 81'H . 8'W x 181 PROP. CONC. CURB ]4' lw2'd - MAIN RD. & FACTORY TRAFFIC SLAB 20^ 20" SEACKED RETAINING STONE WALL p l PROP. ASPHALT TRAFFIC SLAB 20' 20' t, _ 3/4" CRUSH CLEAR AVENUE FROM KITCHEN - 1' •E MIN. 4" PITCHED 1/4^:1' b TO SEPTIC MIN. I^ DIAM. SDR35 OUTLET G9EOGRID EVERY a TO SEPTIC TANK PVC PIPE OR PWw. ~r MIN, 4"DIAM. SDR35 22'-0" VERTICALLY O.C. STONE MATTITUCK, NY MIN. 4" DLt 14 MIN. DL1M. PITCHED EQUIVALENT PTTCHED PIPE OR EQUIVALENT a,; I h I • EXIST. EXISTING SITE SOIL ve^:r PITCHT3D 1/8":1' RETAINING i MIN. .<y ETAINING - - 16'DIAM. x3'-9'DEEP) SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP CONIC, MA 3 i, WALL ON TOP SOIL ADJACENT m- 3000EP.S.1. CONCRETEC DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT MONOLITH o MONOLTTIEC PROPERTY w _ - - - t - _ - - - FILTER FABRIC 1000 1Y^ 2 01 27 plAa, MAX HIJOAL. DIAMETER MA%. HT GAL./FY, e•' - F .I lp REINFORCED SOIL F. MTE~ 8' 3' JUL 00 10 6' 300 300 a 'Ili _ _ •F - 10' 500 r T 706 12- T TR" " mll mlllIlIImIIImIIHllllm111 IIIrt D'-"' MIN. " T 3/4" CRUSH CLEAR m.aa.we 1:,a~.ge iY-0^ Kurz. STONE Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. nlllmll IIrt Y W-0' MiN 1Z'-0" ,MIG Scale: AS NOTED Pisiiiiio3I u TYPICAL GREASE TRAP 12 STACKED WALL & GUARDRAIL D :ORATE DETAIL Drawn by: M.C. y SIDES OF CURB RAMPS 1o CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK SP-3 SCALE: a" = 11-0" SP-3 SCALE:" = 1'-o" SP-3 SCALE: Z" =1'-0" SP-3 SCALE: 2' = 1'-0" 0:\Muin\Autocud\Abi Zeid , Gearye - Southold Car Wush\7-'I1 PLAN. BD.02-24-09\7-29-04\7-29-09-2.clwy, 8%1'1/2009 4:15:54 PM, XE`_; Syneryix M25 (I Roll).pc3 g~ I 0 KEMPEY ENGINEERING h 44j N. 2 8' 4jl U 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY 04 h hU U ~Q WEST BABYLON, NY 11704- (j ci Q4 P: 631.321.7777 ~m O~ h Y/ F: 631.661.0486 U ~S N U ~ Ce ~hV p ' en O y ~o~ m U 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~u 2'h0 1 N a~ m LI HT r~ 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 ~O am" 6.17 0 P. 631.368.3324 V 13 ryP F. 631.368.1524 Oq ' SWAY tim u~ PROP. ELEVATED Z N. ~,6 "7-ELEVEN" SIGN R SEE DETAIL I ~ J TYPICAL TRUCK DEF X DETAIL REVISIONS: ~ N/F SCALE. 1 STOP ry -0" 25.98 N 249 SQ,FT. DEDICATION y' 4e ~O MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC Date Description No. FOR FUTURE TURNING ° 0) CY co vj N RADIUS IMPROVEMENTS a ~ V 5/18/09 NEW DRAWING AS PER COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE STOP N NN 26,15 9 LIGHT W W `p= SO 1832 UZONE: GENERAL SES WALDBAUM'SU SHOPPING B CENTER INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOTTT"Ql n hm EA 2b.78 U 21 W XISTING CURB CUT TO BE 7/23/09 REVISEDPERPLANNINGBD. a REMOVED AND PATCHED TO MATCH UL10 A S P H A L T P A R K I N G COMMENTS DATED y22409x+w. C R O S S W A L K x k °OO STING SEE NOTE NO, 5 i ~ EXISTING CONCRETE BC 25.65 X N X5.95 ° nm RETAINING WALL 146.00 TM -r N 48'57'30" E EXIST, mc7 TC 26.10 X X Y GR~ CRATE BEGINING MARKER J /JlIU 2'7 LIST OF DRAWINGS: 25 0704 1528.57 XI Q EXISTING NATURAL VEGETATION .Ife 26.95 25,39 Sheet Description 1®0* 0 N :we H SP-1 •KEYMAP ~L ION PROP. 7-ELEVEN BLDG. 2 O. -SITE PLAN W O -PARKING CALCULATIONS DETAIL OF CORNER RADIUS = ®m ~ -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS if 111 -SANITARY CALCULATIONS jl .SCALE. 1 - 10 -0 N POIf COMPACT -ZONING ANALYSIS rri .1 ONLY (OW. 4) ® 685 SF. R POSED ADDI ION SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN ~y®~® ® I/ ASPHALT PARKIN G •LANDSCAPESCHEDULE 2' N ®Q IXISTING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL J ~1 k1W ~ 4 ~ ®9Y -LANDSCAPE NOTES 01. -LIGHTING NOTES O COQ NYT14 LIGHT J(c NYi14 ® ® lT ~F SP-3 -SITE DETAIL I ~ Q eqA ® ®®0®~ Qr V Nry EXIST, SP-4 TRUCK ROUTE PLAN & DETAILS BUILDING ~O fyY y mU ® 00 p y ; LE MMOUNTED W PROPOSED LOCATION POLE ACCESS SG TO TO ADJACENT SP-5 TRUCK ROUTE PLAN & DETAILS YW Q ~W N~ U E OI EMPLOYEE OF MTURE CROSS PARKING ONLY (Ott. 2) N PROPERTY A-1 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS Q~ GNT °o®®e ~y i a a°,m.ersu 'al., T 0.e !AwY[ ® I 4 TO 20.02 A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS N's 4OR Yt ffn' Si " `i PROP. ']-ELEVEN' ~ LIGHT yf' * TC 20.40 ~ ~ ~A 46 GRASS TOP SOIL AND BE ING p 8• 57 1J " EXIST.6' BUSH C t &IST,6' 6USX 9O0 .00 EXIST. B" TREE TOP 10 SIGN LLLL pe %we vow 0 .(D mm These plans are an instrument of TOP NN / ® GOO service and are the property of the ^0 GRASS TOP SOIL W %167.6" BUS Engineer. Infringements will be prosecided. II O iC 28]1 'ID (rn} EXIST. 10" BUSH iC 21.01 Contractors shall verify all field TO 25.56 TO 2fi,1O SO 26,2] OIDICAT-N FOR E%I CONIC 9pEWp11( conditions and dimensions and RMK TUNING E%IS 14 NY7344 CW EXIST. SIGN _p_ TELE COV shall be responsible for field ffl and w1us IMPRpE11E1Ts TC 25.02 CONC CURB GUTTER K TC 20.82 w BC 2160 TC 24,07 HNTRY UP 0 quality of work. No allowances W 2 ~ IiE LINE BC 23,15 TC 23,36 - MAIN ROAD R 9 %I T.G4ATE BC 10{3 shall be made on behalf of the _ Contractor for anyerror or neglect OBL YELLOW LINE on his part. SEAL. 0 J (WIDTH VARIES) ^ C LJ~ WHITE LINE o WN11E LINE Project WHITE LINE ~ VVV I C 2 TURN INC LANE 09L LLO UN STOP TO I 9tT LINE NRMGS OR SAO" 1 OIL YELL pW LINE R p g p LYE OW MAIN E OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, ALCOMoOAIE fON i PEOESfIRUN WN1lXUY INC. WHITE (NYSDOT R.D,W.) WHITE UNE (ROUTE 25) - BC 25.9 BL 25.58 5 BC 25,51 CONC CURB 320 FROST POND ROAD TO 55 TC 263E TO 2009 .TO 25.95 2 26 16 CONC CURB (VARIABLE WIDTH) TC 25.32 BC 24.8) TC 24.53 OLD BROOKVILLE,NY UP UP 0 BC 2108 CONC CURB a a h h STOP LINE PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. MAIN RD. & FACTORY NOTE: 4~, <c/~ THERE ARE NO CURB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH 1 'IRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE f AVENUE ADJACENT PROPERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD, AND MARLENE VD MARLENE LANE Q- MATTITUCK, NY V SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP v x DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT r 2~ 1000 142 01 27 4 1 TRUCK ROUTE PLAN Qt-V Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. .1 _r P4 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" ALL SITE INFORMATION ILL a)A IS 9Ag0 UPON Scale: A5 NOTED Its I A SURVEY DATED 02/16/06 ILLY OMED N 02/16/O 02/Ifi/00, JOB 10. 0001y BY: ~VQ~~ Keex ~ ~ Wo RW EwE wW! SP,5 MY~IOM~µY MY~MIM HY. Ip15 fmYVµNµEM Drawn b Y: M.C. II KEMPEY ENGINEERING 2 N 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY Ok hUS~ ~Um v h hU U WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 C7 UQQ,2 O<t/ P: 631.321.7777 U Ln F: 631.661.0486 J ~ ,W h~S N o / V/ u~ h ~ k ~h0 r 7 r~ 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE LI HT EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 h0 am 6.17 P. 631.368.3324 v hrn .13 0 0 Ny F. 631.368.1524 ~N 44, PROP. ELEVATED Oq~Few^Y "7-ELEVEN" SIGN R SEE DETAIL TYPICAL TRUCK DE7 K DETAIL REVISIONS: o?? STOP N p SCALE: I" = 20'-0" N/F 25.98 N 249 SQ.FT. DEDICATION a y 02G W; MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC Date Description No. n 4 h FOR FUTURE TURNING 'd 0. co N RADIUS IMPROVEMENTS a 13' Zu 5/18/09 NEW DRAWING AS PER COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE STOP N r'N 26.15 9 LIGHT TC ie',Tiz ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) SIC ~h USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD A 2b. /8 kV U~ 21'- W 47~ EXISTING CURB CUT TO BE C 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BD. COMMENTS DATED 7,02/09 o REMOVED AND PATCHED TO MATCH LIL13 ASPHALT P A R K I NG u C R O S S W A L K k \N °OO STING SEE NOTE NO. 5 ~A UISTINO CONCRETE BC 25.65 X z5.95 ° m RETAINING WALL 11 ° N 48°57'30" E 146.00 Ulu. AUmc+~ ORATE TC 26.10 X X Y CRT BEGINING MARKER J 25 0704 1528.57 EXISTING NATURAL VEGETATION LIST OF DRAWINGS: Flux 2 7 2009 II~ 26,95 25.39 3 V) ZW E Sheet Description i cn 0y®® SP-1 KEYMAP Wilr*` PROP. 7-ELEVEN BLDG. 2 O. SITE PLAN -PARKING CALCULATIONS (O DETAIL OF CORNER RADIUS = -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Un N -SANITARY CALCULATIONS SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" V POLE Nouurpn SRS , CONPACr -ZONING ANALYSIS M caArs ONLY (att. a) ® 6555 SF, PR POSED ADDITION ASPHALT PI A R N N G SP-2 LANDSCAPE PLAN •LANDSCAPESCHEDULE UISTING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL -LANDSCAPE NOTES ti R -LIGHTING NOTES ~F Ntt14@ ® ® LIGHT 22 Ell NYT1a 0 0 A7` SP-3 -SITE DETAIL 0 Doe 00 0 rL- EXIST. 6 ` k SP-4 TRUCK ROUTE PLAN & DETAILS BUILDING A°` I(.. m a O ' 0 I W PROPOSED LOCATION POLE NDUNIEO .}1 OF FUTURE CROSS SP-5 -TRUCK ROUTE PLAN & DETAILS tee . $1OyAOEI EMPLOYEE ACCESS TO ADJACENT PARKING ONLY (Ott. 2) N PROPERTY A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATION Q m ~T 'o 0 H •OI 00®00000 .y A TG 20,02 A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS 5'.1T~ PROP. '7-ELLM1'EH' TC 20.0 uc TOP ID SIGN y O LIGHT LIL71T These plans are an Instrument of - - N / ® see Ite- -sees asso 048 0060 009 ®0 service and are the property of the I, Engineer. Infringements will be GRASS/ TOP SOIL GRASS/ TOP SOIL AND BE ING p 805 / E3 H vy15L6" BUSH (2 EIGST.6" BUSl1 ~O,oo EXIST. 6" TREE prosecuted. EA (N I O f%ISL6" BUS iC 28.]1 E%IST,fi" p °O ~ tt?ti EXIST. ta" BUSH TO 21.01 Contractors shall verify all flab I, - TC TO 26 10 2B BC 26.23 24 EXI . CONC SIDEWALK k~' EXIST 44 NYT344 conditions and dimensions and Yem o AC m6 Nfl WIUS CW EXIST, SIGN TEE COV C AIL K shall be responsible for field fit and RN)IU6 IYPgWE11EMS TC 24,02 CONC CURB OUIIER TO 20,62 BC 2160 TC 24,W @1TRY UP qualityof work. No albwancea shall be made on behalf of the Z HITE LINE BC 23,65 9C 2],36 TC 20.64 Contractor for any error or --glad OBL YELLOW LINE ryry6~~~ D LGRATE BC 20.43 on his part. SEAL a J A N (WIDTH VARIES) R O A ® / WWI1E o WHITE LINE 25) LINE Project WHITE LINE n [ T z T U R N I N C LANE OBL U-0 UN OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, UNIE scP M TO BE fiEr nco.0 DEL YELLOW LINE MAIN ROAD INC. Pf0E5NWK 10 0AT' PM IMI M" W&NK dHM WAY L YE OW E pp WAKE L ("DOT R,O,W,) WHITE LINE (ROUTE 25) BC 25.38 BC 2158 BIC 29.56 320 FROST POND ROAD iC 2.66 CONC CURB 26.16 TC 25.32 (VARIABLE WIDTH) CONC CURB BC 2.17 TO 24.53 OLD BROOKVILLE,NY UP ~,)UP Q BC 24.08 Ip 6 CONIC CURB I ~ I PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. STOP LINE MAIN RD. & FACTORY NOTE: << 4V <L/~ THERE ARE NO CURB CUTS RUNNIING THE ENTIRE LENGTH 0 \E LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE AVENUE ADJACENT PROPERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE L D MARLENE LANE Q' MATTITUCK, NY V SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP U DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT Q J 1000 142 01 27 h 4 ~V 1 TRUCK. ROUTE PLAN Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. SP-4 SCALE: 1" = 20'-01" ALL SITE INFORMATION A SURVEY GATED 02/16/06, 1 S BAND 02 IS BASE. Scale: AS NOTED C 2T pAIED OZ/16/0 /16/p6, JOB NO. 0601 O6p1$ BY: ,1 J1 ] EWE m c ]UO AWE FW! /.VFXLf P111111111114 41. pW!/ I~IW~HYi1 mN~~IW~HYi~]IS Enaw EnN~I'°i..n~ mw ;nay„ Drawn by: M.C. I~ H NEI NEW 54"SO.x 76"H ED DECORATIVE CUPOLA KEMPEY ENGINEERING NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF NEW FACIA BOARD EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO NEW FACIA NEW NATURAL NEW 7-11 WOOD SIGN LIGHTS WITH SHINGLES MATCH ADDITION BOARD SPLIT SHAKES CARVED WALL ANGLE REFLECTOR 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY AT ALL GABLES SIGN SEE DET.3 EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 MATCH ADDITION P: 631.321.7777 F: 631.661.0486 F EXIST. BLDG. W/ C EXIST. BLDG. W/ TO NEW 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE NEW FACIA BOARD 1 MATCH ADDITION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 TO MATCH ADDITION EL11 C n O FACIA BOARD BOARD TO 11 IT 11 11 IT 11 11 111 11~11~1 11 11 11 1 11 11 P. 631.368.3324 F. 631.368.1524 F ¦ EXIST. BLDG. NEW HAR NK EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW SIDING IN LIGHT LIGHT b GRAY TONE HARDIPLANK SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY TONE REVISIONS: NEW PRECAST NEW 4" PRECAST vFi CONC, . LEDGE CONC. LEDGE Date Description No. Lai 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS T 0 -H F=~ H H H DATED 03/13/08 NEW 6" 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 CONC, CURB NEW 6" CONC. CURB RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE 10, 1. GRADE INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GRADE 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS NEW 10" SQUARE DECORATIVE NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, NEW MAIN ENTRA EW MAIN ENTRANCE DOORWAY NEW HARDIPLANK NEW PICTURE WINDOWS W/ WHITE TRIM FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF COLUMNS WITH 12" SQUARE NANTUCKET STYLE WITH W/ TRANSOM WIP / TRANSOM WINDOW ABOVE SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY & SOL DIVIDED LIGHT PANELS TYP. TONE ALL NEW WINDOW LOC. SOTTHOLD PLANNING BD. STONE BASE, TYP. ® ALL 7 LOC. PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD STRIPE STANDARDS - STANDARD COLORS 3M FILM MATE FILM MATERIAL COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD 1 SOUTH ELEVATION A-RED C- GREEN COMMENTS DATED 7/2 p~ 3680-53 (CARDINAL RED) 3680-58 (DARK GREEN) i ~il~ A-1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EQUIVALENT PMS # 1797 EQUIVALENT PMS # 342 12 AVERY # 10836-7-11 RED AVERY # 10835-711 GREEN REEN AUG 2 7 2009 Ij l B-ORANGE D- WHITE 3623 (BRIGHT ORANGE) LIST OF DRAWINGS: r EQUIVALENT PMS # 165 E-BRONZE AVERY # 10837-7 11 ORANGE PANTONE 19-1116 Sheet Description ~uk ti-:~ . KEY MAP B A -SITE PLAN _ _ 'PARKING CALCULATIONS B ~ - 00 N SP-1 .DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS I i - -SANITARY CALCULATIONS LEVEn iv M -ZONING ANALYSIS _ -LANDSCAPE PLAN A °O SP-2 -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE LANDSCAPE NOTES E C A D -LIGHTING NOTES NE 31-6" 3'-0" NEW 54"SQ.x 76"H SP-3 SITE DETAIL ~DE DECORATIVE CUPOLA 101-211 A_1 NCIRTT-TAITDgOTTT4PTNVATTONS / 3 7-11 WOOD WALL SIGN A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW _ SCALE: 1/2" = 1L0" ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION MATCH ADDITION PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN These plans are an instrument of service and are the property of the / Engineer. Infringements will be prosecuted. Contractors shall verify all geld F contllllons and dimensions and shall be responsible for field fit and EXIST. BLDG. W/ EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW quality of work. No allowances - - shall be made on behalf of the - NEW FACIA BOARD FACIA BOARD TO MATCH ADDITION Contractor for anyanor or neglect TO MATCH ADDITION on his part. SEAL GAMA DEER PARK, F EXIST. BLDG. W/ INC. NEW HARDIPLANK EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW SIDING IN LIGHT HARDIPLANK SIDING IN 320 FROST POND ROAD N GRAY TONE LIGHT GRAY TONE OLD BROOKVILLE,NY NEW SERVICE ENTRACE DOOR 7-ELEVEN, INC. 5 MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY NEW 6" / NEW B" CON C. CURB CONC. CURB SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP GRADE GRADE SEC. BLK. LOT 142 01 27 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. 2 NORTH ELEVATION AS NOTED A4 A-1 SCALE: 1/4" = P-0" M.C. q:\Moin\Autocad\Ahi Zeid , George - SoUth Old Cur Wmh\7-11 PLAN. BD.02-24-(19\7-29-U9\7-29-09-2.dwg, 8/21/2009 4:15:28 PM, XES Synergix 8825 (1 Roll).pc3 IV NEW 54'SQ.x 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA KEMPEY ENGINEERING 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF SIGN LIGHT WITH SHINGLES EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO ANGLE REFLECTOR MATCH ADDITION WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 P: 631.321.7777 L1~ NEW NATURAL F: 631.661.0486 SPLIT SHAKES AT ALL GABLES ( v EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE MATCH ADDITION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 NEW 7-11 WOOD u CARVED WALL P. 631.368.3324 SIGN BEYOND F. 631.368.1524 EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW NEW FACIA BOARD NEW HARDIPLANK FACIA BOARD TO SIDING IN LIGHT MATCH ADDITION GRAY TONE EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW REVISIONS: NEW 10" SQUARE HARDIPLANK SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY TONE HI DECORATIVE COLUMNS WITH 12" SQUARE STONE BASE, TYP. Date Description No. 4 ALL 7 LOC. 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 NEW 4" PRECAST CONCRETE LEDGE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS DATED 03/13/08 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 NEW 6" CONC. CURB NEW 6" CONC. CURB RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE BEYOND INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GRADE GRADE 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, SOUTHOLD PLANNING BD. NANTUCKET STYLE WITH PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 8/21/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATEI4 7/29/09 3 EAST ELEVATIOIN -2 SCALE: 1/4" = P-0" LIST OF DRAWINGS: Aft; 2 i 2oos Sheet Description -KEY MAP m.•.. . -SITE PLAN _ SP-1 PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS -SANITARY CALCULATIONS -ZONING ANALYSIS NEW 54"SQ.x 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA -LANDSCAPE PLAN .I SP-2 'LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE LANDSCAPE NOTES -LIGHTING NOTES EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW NEW ROOF NEW GOOSENECK SP-3 SITE DETAII, ROOF SHINGLES TO SHINGLES SIGN LIGHT WITH MATH ADDITION ANGLE REFLECTOR ? 1 TT^TI T A TT [l T T T ri i'!i T 1 mT/~Te. 1VVA1Rt11V1/17VU111LL13VHIwi-43 NEW NATURAL A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS SPLIT SHAKES AT ALL GABLES EXIST. BLDG. W/ t PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN NEW ROOF These plane are an instrument of SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION service and are the property of the Engineer. Infringements will be NEW 7-11 WOOD CARVED WALL prosecuted. SIGN BEYOND Contractors shall verify all field conditions and dimensions and EXIST. BLDG. W/ a_e shall be responsible for field fit and NEW FACIA BOARD NEW HARDIPLANK NEW FACIA BOARD quality of work. No allowances a TO MATCH ADDITION N SIDING shall be made on behalf of the Contractor for anyarmr or neglect SEAL on his part. EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW HARDIPLANK NEW 10" SQUARE DECORATIVE COLUMNSH SIDING IN LIGHT WITH 12' SQUARE GAMA_DEER PARK, GRAY TONE STONE BASE, TYP. 4 ALL 7 LOC. q. NEW 4" PRECAST INC. NEW 4" PRECAST CONCRETE LEDGE CONCRETE LEDGE 320 FROST POND ROAD OLD BROOKVILLE,NY NEW 6" CONC. NEW 6" CONC. CURB f CURB BEYOND 7-ELEVEN, INC. GRAD GRADE e NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, MAIN RD. & FACTORY NANTUCKET STYLE WITH AVENUE PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. MATTITUCK, NY SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP SEC. BILK. LOT 4 WEST ELEVATION 142 01 27 A-2 SCALE: 1/4" = P-0" Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. i AS NOTED A 2 M.C. Q:\Muin\Autocucl\Ahi Zeid George - Southold Cur Wo:h\7-11 PLAN, B0.02-24-09\7-29-09\7-~4-Oy-2,c{yyg, H1W111QL)) 4:14;--31 PM, XF$ SyneLgix HNYG ('I RolQ pl:j I~ • Luminaire Schedule Project: All Projects KEMPEY ENGINEERING Symbol Oty Label Arrangement Lumen, LLF Oeeariptian B Pavilon SINGLE 9600 0.720 Wall Light CC25W-100 MH 8 11 Country Club SINGLE 14000 0.720 175 watt Metal ballad, down lite with flat ten 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 Numeric Summary Luminaire Location Summary P: 631.321.7777 Project: All Projects Project: All Projects Mounting Heigh F: 631.661.0486 Label CalcTyps Unite Avg Max Min Avg/Min SegNo Label 2 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE Cal,Ple Illuminance Fa 1,29 67 0.2 6,40 1 Country Club 20 ~ EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 2 Country Club 20 V P. 631.368.3324 0 Country Club 20 F. 631.368.1524 Rryf1VgY 4 Country Club 20 ,i REVISIONS: 5 Country Club 20 _ N/F 6 Country Club 20 i MATTITUCN PLAZA LLC Date Description No. l o 0 4/13/09 GENERATED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. 7 Country Club 20 ZONE. GENERAL BUSINESS (B) TO O O OLD SUNG D USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER 6 Country Club 20 - 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD ASPHALT PA F HI NC COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 9 Country Club 20 r. U r C N 48'5 '30" E 146.00 10 Country Club 20 0.7 °0.9 12 °7.7 °1.3 °0.9 0.9 °1.3 °1.7 °1.2 0.9 °0,6 °0.4 °0.5 °O6 11 Country Club 20 ! LIST OF D RAWINGS: 0.5 12 Pavilon 12 0.5 1.6 °2.2 °4.0 °2.5 1.6 °1.6 2.5 4.0 2,2 °1.0 °0.8 °0,8 °0,8 °0 8 ; 21001 Lw, I M1 Sheet Description 0. fi °3,7 310 2. ° T3J °1.0 °1.0 °1 0 - 13 Pavilon 12 SP-I .KEY MAP - aQ PROP. 7-ELEVEN BLDG. / O ~I -SITE PLAN r_...._ + 14 Pavilon 12 i, 2.1 °5.1 ° .0 4.0 2.0 °7 5 Qu -PARKING CALCULATIONS 15 Pavilon 12 0 0 2.2 °1.2 °23 °4.7 °31 - -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS -SANITARY CALCULATIONS 16 Pavilon 12 -ZONING ANALYSIS s °1,6 s o.5 1 0 685 5/ PR POSED ADDITION °2.5 °5'6 °42 m 1, SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN 17 Pavilon i2 3; 4.9 °i,6 ° 6 V. 6/ /Sl:b%/ .5 °2,7 °1 ,9 T -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE xW a 3.0. -LANDSCAPE NOTES F , v ~ 4 ^ ,8 3.7 ~ .8 3.7 ° 2.1 °1.0 °2, .5 °2,5 1 f °1.6 2.5 X1.5 62. °1,0 °0.6 ° ,2 °2, -1 0 °1.5 -LIGHTING NOTES Nr rl SP-3 -SITE DETAIL °5.1 °5,1 °0,9 °1. °3.'9 0.9 °1.3 °1.7 °1. 0.9 °0.8 °2.3 °47 ° .1 ,y - _ a A-1 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS 3.7 2 3 °0.6 °0.6 °7.0 °1.3 °0,6 °0.8 °0.8 °1.0 °0.8 °0.8 °0.8 °0,8 q, w A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS v o ° )3 0,a 0,6 0.a 0.6 0.s 0.5 b,7 b.9 0.7 b.9 b,7 °0.6 y_ 4.6 PH-1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN .4 °.7 11. 2`5 °7.2 to °1.8 2.5 ,9 2.5 ° 9 °2.0 - o ° .4 ~ 2,2 2.8 1 .5 2.fi °1 .6 4 °1,1 2. 5 fi V.7 2 0 ,4 'S.5 °S fi %,6 °3,7 7.6 °2.5 siOP j 4.2 ' !2.1 SLOP 12.1 03 0.9 °7.9 4.2 3.1 7.. 1 °2,2 / °5,D ? ry2,6 l , ' .8 °J. X5.5 °2.4 These plans are an Instrument of service and are the property of the Engineer. Infringements will be 6 1.6 ' :6 6 4 713 o E, 1 9 o 2,3 prosecuted. I I Contractors shell verify all field 1 conditions and dimanslons and shall be responsible for field fit and - quality of work No allowances shag be made on behalf of the DEL. YELLOW LINE fl p~~ AI ~E (wloiN Contractor for anyertor or neglect Mdogs on his part. SEAL. WHITE LINE vanles) ROAD (S.R. 25) Project WHITE LINE TURN V iUR N IN G L Aryg DRL ELLO ?N C Ian FfR LINE NE BU Of DRL YELLOW LINE MAIN ROAD OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, FIIFMEq MCI 10 FOR ACCOMMOM PE9ESIHIW W,LLNfW~Y INC. LYE OW [ WHITE LINE TC 2559 TC 26 09 TO 25.55 WHITE (N)YSDOT R,O.w) LINE (ROUTE 25) 29 SC 25 9 BC 25 25.58 BC 25 54 CONC CURB .55 cuR=0=487 is (VaRIABLE WIDTH) - 1453 320 FROST POND ROAD UP 16 ~UP O Q Rc 24,06 OLD BROOKVILLE,NY caNC cuRa Ee STOP LINE I PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. MAIN RD. & FACTORY ~4,j u AVENUE l MATTITUCK, NY r SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 2 DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT 2 2 J ti 1000 142 01 27 LN Date: 4.13.09 drawing no, 1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SCALE: 1" = 201-0" ALL SITE INFORMATION IS BASI A SURVEY DATED 02/16/08, JOB N ,N0 2/1-Ar 6/0N is 06013 Scale: AS NOTED tttt~ ID JOB NO N0. . 06013, 9Y: vou,vurH a eausH ,vurH a 6RUSN L1gKERYO-VMp LAtYNG 3W N6 fMF:l6 14Rp1 NY.~11)10 L1gKERYO-VMp LAtYNG 3W N6~ fMF:l6 14Rp1 NY.~11)10 6nW'A4w~MMM~.xm Drawn by: DLS I II 1D KEMPEY ENGINEERING AREA NAME AREA SIZE CODE REQ. REQUIRED PROPOSED SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS REQUIRED DRAINAGE CONVENIENCE STORE 2,670 SQ.FT. 1 SPACE/200 SQ.FT. 14 SPACES 24 SPACES IF) 2770 CU.FT. / 68.37 CF/VF = 40.° VF = 40.51 V.F. AREA AREA DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN TOTAL TOTAL INCLUDING (2) HANDICAP PARKING SPACE EXISTING DRAINAGE FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW BY 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY SITE DATA (3) 0 10' DIA. X 8' DEEP = 3 x 8 3 x 8' = 24 V.F. NAME SIZE SANITARY: GREY: TOTAL: SPAC S PACE: WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 P: 631.321.7777 ITEM AMOUNT % PROVIDED DRAINAGE CONVENIENCE 2,670 0.03 gpd/sf 0.02 gpd/sf 0.05 gpd/sf 3 x 8' = 24 V.F. STORE SF =80 gdp =54 gdp =134 gdp 134 c 134 gdp F: 631.661.0486 PLOT SIZE 24,140 SQ.FT. 100 (3) O 10' DIA. X 8' DEEP = 3 x 8 (0.55 ACRES) TOTAL DRAINAGE BUILDING AREA 2,670 SQ.FT. 11.06 48 V.F. CALCULATIONS FOR STORM WATER RUN-OFF RETENTION TION 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK/CURB ARE 13,865 SQ.FT. 57.43 AREA RUN-OFF COEFF. FT. OF RAIN CU.FT.RETENTION REO'D ION REQ'D P. 631.368.3324 TOTAL LANDSCAPING 7,403 SQ.FT. 30.66 / PAVEMENT 13,865 SQ.FT. 0.9 0.17 2121 CU.FT. UNDEVELOPED AREA 0 SQ.FT. 0 b"s CU.FT. F. 631.368.1524 LANDSCAPE 7,403 SQ.FT. 0.25 0.17 315 CU.FT. DEDICATED AREA (INCL. SOME 249 SO.FT. 1.03 aP~W,t a k~ CU.FT. LANDSCAPE AREA BUILDING 2,670 SQ.FT. 1.0 0.17 454 CU.FT, CU. FT. REVISIONS: m 2890 CU.FT. CU.FT. Date Description No. ZONING INFORMATION N/F TOTAL 24,140 SQ.FT. 2890 CU.FT. MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC CU.FT. 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 SCTM#'S: 6 TOWN OF SO=OLD COMMENTS STREET ADDRESS: 9945 MAIN ROAD, MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NY TL DATED 0 VIA ZONING DISTRICT: B-GENERAL BUSINESS EXISTING 8" 1 TOTAL AREA OF SUBJECT LOT: 24,140 SQ.FT. (0.55 ACRES) RETAINING EXISTING 8" CONCRETE BAL BUSINESS (B) X17.75 X17.41 X SITE LOCAL, RETAINING UM'S SHOPPING CENTER 18'92 LOCATION RE VISED AS PER COMMENTS & 03/02/09 COMMENDATIONS FROM THE 3 TOTAL LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED: 2,670 SQ,FT. WALL ALONG WALL ALONG NORTHERLY PAVED AREA PROPOSED: 13,865 SQ.FT. 3 PROPERTY LIP PROPERTY LINE ASPHALT P A R N N O .7 13~7^'7R°f31 PV F'~ V'irJJ 1''- n, °I`iisdul~j`1~fig ~1,~ II-0 M""~ II11 A'l..,N 3f"1' 71j1iI 'd TC 48'57'30" E R~ LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED: 4 828 SQ FT. (0%~ z1'0° j~ INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~y Y{ 4/13/09 KEVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS LANDSCAPE AREEAA PROPOSED: x,403 SC).FT. 2.30. 6%) n; LANDSCAPE FRONT YARD REQUIRED: 2414 SQ.FT. N 48'57'30 6.00 X16.aa f 11 +s " FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF LANDSCAPE FRONT YARD PROPOSED: 2,713 SQ.FT. SS AM kS EXIST. 1200 GAL OUTIT0' PL O BD. PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE REQUIRED TO BE IN FRONT YARD: 50% GR S cwsE EXIST. 1200 GAL dr f iV, PEERCEENT of eNDSCAPE PROPOSED TO „BE IN FRONTYARD: 179% rv" ° EXIST. NITARY SEPTIC TANK FF~ONT YAF2D SETBACK REQUIRED 40 -0 LEa c POOL SEPTIC TANK PROP. X 10' TRASH 25 ,"i`'I "P'N+M12SCILV xis kU`r'c y4~ 1,~,4~ S' ~~.I Is vt ~I ~~ROPOSED 1000 ENCLOSUR URE ON CONC. PAD rp I ~ nryi wr ~ V1~'3G ~I ry 1{° ~j xFtpY + 41 1i" 7/23/09 REVISED PERPLANNINGBOARD FRONT YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 77'-l" / MH a. \ / IV `.ALLNN GREASE TRAP r:C a',Sh'~ti~~,~1PF~f1~ Ill 7~N,i d N~ \,.IC -PROP.5 CU. TO. O O O O O` PROP. BOLLARD - CONTAINER (TYP.TRASH ~r COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 15'-0 „aP P u.~°\ 0 -(0 0 Y~ TIV"'d I't Y 4k 51 ~4~ l IIt I,i yf (TYP.) ) rl~~Ktlrr 191,0 Y'14 a~ °I P~Nm"ON b J SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 49'-2" REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIRED: 25'-0"F REAR YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 21'-8" 4.89 _ 2 IGH 1 ST,fl'li o 4.99 METEI, r-71 r T. 24 .BO ~c lr, a s I f V) 'rk. 1'1'7{ n o-r mt~3fl du '~R!ILrih .rd ~I'y)a 1) )vry~ ,yr.~,'P~) , ns ,y, k 1 PROPOSED TOTAL L J L J BC 24.40 go z"'R. ' CONVENIENCE STORE 13C 24.40 Y h7'k~`, , )ag l?Y' ,a r I ,I,1C, AREA (2.670 SF O LIST OF DRAWINGS: o ilm a RAN wno~rN r 0. 1 Yp» + IGlri{~ i'dr n 24.69 i 9 _ - - 7 {~~t~I ti I'i` I ,)1 kli1'13IUf1l i,lti` y11 E,,w i, 1,11'I)E I~, I't Xm.zS X rf ;'f'~'1. 1 1w1 ~1 rt t k1L I~h i' , L n ".Si . a0. Y CURRENT USE: GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE B 2 2. R ay ~ 'dSheet Description PROPOSED USE: 7-ELEVEN CONVENIENCE STORE ~J ITIC RN N. / \ L 1 1y"",+~~ 1 Vtl~yyfW711'rl rt1';~1,il~y 1., iP~~W~Ii° ISE M. J-0) XIST. G TE EL. / LOA f 3 EMIR OWT e l¢ ^T' ~s""1 ',~f-,I .)Y,Ns y (~~lh +l'P I " / lo' r . cus ONLY fury. a) ~ ~ ~ :.3i>d ~'1.,-?~'+re ~-rub",:T'1 SP-1 KEY MAP .53 j22.01) -SITE PLAN BC 22.81 EXI COME PJiOe~uG 685 SF. PR POSED ADDITION I T~ % / S C 24.5G A S P H ALT PARKIN G 2 M" -PARKING CALCULATIONS EL. 23,81 T (22.86) 1111111 EXISTING 8" CONCRETE RETAINING SP-1 11111111 oil WALL ALONG EASTERLY PROPERTY -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS LINE TO BE MODIFIED AS -SANITARY CALCULATIONS LEGEND b"° G 24.36 24.E 243 ' T 4.7 RO "ATM" PROP. FIBER REQUESTED TO CONSTRUCT -ZONING ANALYSIS TIC = TOP OF CURB N" # 24.2 24,53 3 C 24.2 B 24.2 WINO W SIG TQ 24,74 REINFORCED CROSS ACCESS IF REQUIRED BC 24.24 CONCRETE 0 Q TIC 25.00 SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN BT = BOTTOM OF CURB s? a g N BC 24.50 M ^ slm / X I&90 STRIPE STANDARDS - STANDARD COLORS 3M FILM MATERI MNUreRI -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE -LANDSCAPE NOTES EL = ELEVATION BC 24.25 A-RED C- GREEN R P. T.O.G. PROP. "7-11" WOOD CARVED / ¦ = MONUMENT EXIST. BUILDING t~ 3 EZXST.R TE IN[ INL T WALL SIGN W/ GOOSENECK 368053 (CARDINAL RED) 388058 (DARK GREEN) -LIGHTING NOTES • EL. 22.75 LIGHTING TAN P EQUIVALENT PMS 7'9787 EQUIVALENT PMS 11342 F FUNRE Cfl099 y • AVERY# 10836-7-11 RED AVERY 010635.711 GREEN m T. L.P. PROPERLY Dm ~A S~ V N SP-3 -SITE DETAIL = DRAINAGE FLOW egg EL z~5.60 \ EL BC 24.50 ec a 5 J - t - I UTILITY POLE o w 3623 (BRIGHT ORANGE) B-ORANGE DL WHITE " L HT T 27) a' o. L.P. OP. T.D.G. r, 23.25 EQUIVALENT PMS0165 E-BRONZE A-I -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS LP o~ 6.1 ON ME, WPLOYEE Oy ryryry,,,IN EL 22 50 C 22.75 m xa.ozX\ AVERY010337-771 ORANGE PANTONE 1&1118 NEW G07° -NEW GOiySENECK SIGN LIGHT WIl'H LIGHT WIl'H ANGLE A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS PARKING EM PARKING ONLY (Ott. rn na n PROP. UMEN 't; REFLECTOR REFLECTOR DAl'UM: UhUh- NUVl) 19ly ' = ELEVEN" SIGN ` my n i SEE DEfNL BC 24 70 - BC 23 90 ucNT 22~ 5 \xltOxxX°`"~ CQ:6nT ~ Tc 20.0 III NEW2I/4' NEW 2 1/4' THICK WOOD PH-1 'SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN MR 26.96 n 24. M R. C50 TC , , PANEL-1GN b' BC 23,0 P,x69~P9~ wAr elm BTTCWW 231.08G0[CM TThWy ?p ~ y 7- I I SIGN PANEL- WHITE-- WITH CARVED 7-11 51GNAGr WITHIN These plans are an losbument of O~ FOP fumRRo"WLNE NO UCHT m MIG6 IYPROtfYEN19 service and ere the property of the - j ^tJ 1 LIGHT 2340 2C•53 _ 24,581, - 1,'2404 _ IO p.:~y BWI]..la BW 19.79 D"T~n 4 F!NtiG. 4 I•- ' - DINO a1A%Ex Engineer. Infringements wgl be -4 IDS CUPS M m CE IIII IN Ps w4 SEE NO-i S 48.57 30 W R 24.64 1 g g, EL .47 r 19 225 W04 15x8.96 o-- A NEW 10" SI ff 4/,: EL 24.64 % % c El 22,60 EL x4a2 COLUMN5- NEW 10" 5QUARE WOOD prosecuted. YY ~~~EO fa . ro k W~L 4.29 %x TC 21.01 C } 5QNARE 51 COLUMN5- WHITE- WITH 12" ' u 1 'r SQUARE STONE 5A5E, TO Contractors shall verify all told zafe TC 26. ' TC R6.f0X X EXIST. CONC 510 WALK 24 52~- -5 0 s o'ttocx % % 22.51 M y e W;in„,i r. MATCH BUILDING conditions and dlmenslons and BC 26.23 6 MAPo.CP L 07M 203 152157 ENABi, 9G1 I UP3 d „eoroso'wa P90P949 hxnaNC[ MILE MARKER D t MATCN BUI NYTJN 3' x, n4 SeNWC aex. In fMx 25 0704 1529 E ,50 471ST. ' . E ( " '~I shell be rosponsibb for field fit and 26.85 Iil 1¢L65CUV TC 20.62 , +t...'f ::.+:M-:\ ,c Y.,1•r':.• quality of work. No allowances - 9C 2{ 0 C s H NE 6 c 24.0> BNTAY 4 c v:e1 % 2 34 5 23.ee c 23.35 z0.aa } shall be made on behalf of the PnOPwEO M9 O C 2282 ~J ®5C 20.43 PION PLWEO MEx ME Contractor fur anyarror or neglect SOL YELLOW UNE J [p~ V41 LINE on his pan. SEAL 26.16 o MITE UNE A I (WIDTH VARIE (WIDTH Ve5IE6)~ ^ (S R 25~ roject X 26.92 r 4.98 x m 4.98 OAD CLOSEDEVON ".04- 4' NEW '2LDOF NEW 'ELDORADO' 5TONE, NMIE LINE X26,2 TU R N I N a LANE Oft u uN NANTUCKET NANTUCKET 5rtu WITH C PRECAST C PRF~AST CONCRETE CAP. OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, {iP smP uxE m BE sLT DBL YEUAW UNE w m KEpYOMR FOR TO MATGN L TE OW E 21.63 TO MATCH BUILDING INC. Kpola. OROSSWNX ' (NYSD07 R,O.W,) %2046 26.25 26.03 MITE LINE 320 FROST POND ROAD 26.26 TC 23.31 26.00 TC 25.95 24,4; BC R] 9 TD BC 25.56 SC 25.64 R •I TC 25,32 PVAINIQ E WDTH) z4,43 ' PLAM'2R Af OLD BROOKVI LLE,NY . ~~1I PLA SIDE NT OF ER AREAS SIGNAGE ON (6'-EA4" x EACH C 26.16 8C 24,87 TC 2 00 M 2, BO 2406 51PP OP 511 CONC CURB y_9• EACH) 8" I i• ~UP ~UP 0 O E rACH) j a ~a a ,iu'; STOP LINE 1O. P69roem ,M2 urT NEW UCKET mIw's00 P+rcm -L _ - - _ - - NANTUCKET _ G,_ -l ° - L \ ~ NEW 'ELDORADO' STON If. PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. ~ ' 2nn9 I - ~ NANTUCKET 5mE MAIN RD. & FACTORY L L WE4 TE RY.OIM4Y. YE ,.j Ofl. 1(0) NOTE: AVENUE CyW THERE ARE NO CURB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE ADJACENT PROPERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD, AND MARLENE LANE * M _ PRECA5TC PRECAST CONCRETE CAP MATTITUCK, NY -NEW 2 1/4"THICK WOOD SUEFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP v V J- - - - - - _L J NEW 2 1/4° / , PANEL- WHI PANEL-WHITE-WITH CARVED DIST. SEC, BLK, LOT 7-11 51GNAGE WITHIN r 1000 142 01 27 r a 7- I I WOOD STREET SIGN W/ 1 SITE PLAN v W/ Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. ~v 3 GOOSENECK FIXTURE P-1 SCALE: I°=20'-0" ~Q SP-1 scALE: s/s - r-a' N-,S- Scale: AS NOTED SpIlIlIlls A SURVEY DATED 02/16, DJPVEI' DATED 02/10/06, JOe Na 06013, BY, ~YOLLMUTH d DMNm xxA YOLLMUTH d• B USH an fws vlC FIM N" .ure raw uvv ~ fixx'~ryuy ~N- :w*Y"°>~r Drawn b ~.ry„.' Y M.C. n MIAMI. LANDSCAPING NOTES : KEMPEY ENGINEERING 19 I ^~~rI.3f n 1. COVEELAELPLANMO13EDS WITH AMIMMUM OF r THICKNESS OF HARDWOODMULCFL 2. AT PLANDNGBEDS INPARKINGAREAS AND AREAS OF REQUIRED TRAFFIC VISIBILITY USE LOW PROFILEPLANTINGS. ,iHf. l+tyl1p.,"~ 3 lHL IF STS0111 ro 31 ..nf~ I IT's3Y v.u 'IF .ppgnlLl Vs. _WI 3. DTR2INGLOCALGROWINGSEASON, OWNER SHALL PURCHASE AND PLANT ANNUAL FLOWERINGPLANTS AS REQUIRED IN PLANM CLOSE GAPS IN PLANTINGAREAS AND TO ADD COLORAND VARIETY TO LANDSCAPING. IDPD INPLANTINOBW9 TP 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY I; 1. PROVIDE NEW IN-MOUND IRRIGATION SYSTEMAT ALLREAS OF LANDSCAPING AS REQUIRED BY CODE 5. STREET TREES. STREET TREES WITH A MINIMUM CALIPER OF FOURINCEIFSSHALLBEPLANTEDAND/ORMATNTARM ADJACENTT WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 ROAD FRONTAGES INACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS IN AN AMOUNTEQUAL TO 30 FEET ON CENTEK MMAD'ACRNTTOALL P: 631.321.7777 WAFT [ AMENDED 2-10-2004. EFFECTIVE 3.1.20001 6. PARIONOAREASCREENING. ALL PARKINGAREAS SHALL BE SCREENED PROMVIEWWrlH A HEDGE, BERM AND/OR DECORATIVE 06 RDBCORATra WALLM F: 631.661.0486 low IE MR1190 "m M011111i M aillla4tr mks 3T411F T14R IIIXm lRCIrR91 FENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS. 7. DECORATIVE OFF-STREETPARRANG LOT LIGHTS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED, INSTALLED AND MAWTABNED. R. OFF-STREET PASSING LOT LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE NONADJUSTABLE HORIZONTALLY MOUNTED FIXTURES WITH LESS THAN MLass THAN 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE MINIMAL NINETY-DEGREE LUMINAItE CUTOFF. FIXTURES THAT PROJECT LIGHT OR GLARE TOWARD THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ADJOIINGPROPERTIESSHALL NOT BEFRE II9 .LNOTBBPM&TTRD. EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 9. PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ALONG PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND ALLI [WAYS AND AMEYWAYS. P. 631.368.3324 ~.Ti.MI d, Q I-Nt~mtl1~'-i ,so fY~T.t WIlI.XB iR IIWfo 10, BUIDINGMOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE FOR SAFETY ORSIGNAGE PURPOSES ONLY AND MUST DIRECT LIGHT DOWNWARD 3HfDOWNWARD. F. 631.368.1524 Yi L. rude f - d ~Rryt. WALL PACK LIGHTS OR OTHER LIGHTING THAT SHIIDS OUTWARD TOWARD ADJOINING PROPERTIES OR THE STREET RIGHT-OF -WA g SHALLBE PROHIBITED. SHIELDING SHALLBE PROVIDED TO AVOID LIGHT TRESPASS AND GLARE QRTMORT-M-WAY - Y• OWE WAr 11. DECORATIVE STREETLIGHTS OF NOTMORB THAN 12 FEET INHEIGHT SHALLBEUNIFORMI.Y APPLIM, INSTALLED AND AND ^ -p ~"i L ~.131Y 'I MAINTAINEDSITUATED IN SIDEWALK CUTOUTS EVERY 30 FEET ON CENTER ALONG THE SITE'S FRONTAGE. THE SAM LIGHTING FIXTURE SHALL BE APPLIED TO EACHMAINSTRFBTBUSINESS DISTRI m~ yy~ I1I+-.-._p-1 NIF PU Im OEM Mums DisnucT. REVISIONS: L~~ IST' YYIt ltwrllfYtl N/P Date Description No. 1 1 :~In L - IYIILW. I:.. LL MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC ®dfl - t'~ 1' lli~lR lip~q°if r. _ 10/10/08 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS 2 eu r ru xerL mom Rxaae ~ry _I r i_ .iL° tl 2~ limt / DATED 03/13/08 / TC 1832 ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) ~F USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE / LIL13 ASPHALT PA R K I N G INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD mb` RUNNINGCW . `g 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF / all e" N 48'57'30" E 146.00 / EXIST. Nm - - - - - - OUTHOLD PL G BD CM OMTE 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD EXISTING NATURAL VEGETATION. COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 LANDSCAPE SCHMULE / KEY BOTANICALNAME COMMONNAME SIZE QUANTITY a v®04° -1 r~ w O PICEA RUBENS RHD SPRUCE 41 A. 12 J/ ~ ® 8' - - - - r - , L_ J L J 'P CUPRESSOCYPARIS 19YLORD CYPRB95 30. &L 39 Q LE000THOB AACHIAOSA SWEBTBELLLBIICOTHOE 4'6'H is O THUMOCCIDENTALTSNIORA AAIBIITCAN ARBORVITAE TH 23 . LIST OF DRAWINGS: PROP. 7-ELEVEN BLDG. ® - - - - - - to Sheet Description S AmmmUS CHINBN515 GOLD COAST J"M It- 111 189 /J v / 5 ALLEMM(ILANDSCAPB TO RM AB4 PGL> NGL~NTEG SP-1 XEY MAP C7) BUONYMUSATATUS WINOBDBUONY " 3'.'H 9 .SITE PLAN 65SF. R S DDI ION ASPHALT PARKING PARKING CALCULATIONS Q 04) LrOlron A DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS "T 1~• ^T 5 ~Qf~41 I I / / / EKISMO CONCRETE RETUNING WALL -SANITARY CALCULATIONS ® ® LIGHT y ^ -ZONING ANALYSIS a SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN Q N IQ 0 11 : @'0 0 T 40 9 @a es00O -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE -LANDSCAPE NOTES EXIST. l k pa ! ® 0 fM'® ® O -LIGHTING NOTES BUILDING (0 117. 9 ® L14 PROPOEEO LOCARON ® y~ {l OF FUNRE CROSS ® !F ACCESS TO ADJACENT SP-3 -SITE DETAIL PROPERET Q) ki n GO 00 A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS l TC 20.02 A-2 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS 91E._ 6 26 aW EU PROP. y-ELEYEx' TC x0.10 tAilb PH-1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P ID slcN * dMI LIGHT Uu~IT These plans are an Instrument of l0'^~~Y,~v N / ® 0®0 service and are the property of the GRAS TOP Sal GRAS TOP Sal. AND BE ING IXIST.S' BUSH Engineer. Infringements VIII be prosecuted. 'W EMST.6' EgSE6' BUSH 9C) 00 EAST. S' TREE i 8057'3 W EAST.G'BU6 O 01ti MIN H 11111111111 '(D n EKIST, 10' BUSH TC 21.01 Contractors shall verify all field ' 'I> J~' =20TC26.71 TO 25,10 TG 25.x5 ETD CONIC SIDEWALK conditions and dimensions and shall be responsible for field 1lf and 6C 25.23 OEaIGnGN Am EzIST v 14 Ntt344 GW EWST. SIGN TELE TC xo,ez MUPE MINING MIU6 IMPAMEMIDOM BC 24 .80 CONIC CURB CU TC 24.0) HNTRY K UP O quality of work. No allowances I~ shall be made on behalf of the t ° WH 1E LINE BC x3.fi5 iC 2].36 KI ;CCpV?Q1~3 Contractor for anyerror or neglect _ BC 2 .0 on his part. SEAL GEL Y OW LINE n J / WHITE UNE 0 I1E LINE ROAD M A I N (WINN VARIES) c WN IS,R, 25) Project WHITE LINE V TURNING LANE LLG LIN DBL YELLOW LINE OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, NPfHEP YLN9FUOfl Acwx6wre roe PFDEE/NV.N YYIHWAY L TE OW MAIN Rpgp E INC. (NYSOOT R.O,W,) WHILE WHIIE LINE (ROUTE 25) 320 FROST POND ROAD ~ ~ Be 25.39 BC 25.58 60 25.54 TO 25.56 CONIC CURE LINE (VARIABLE WIDTH) CONIC CURB TG 26'32 TC x1,33 OLD BROOKVILLE,NY 26.16 UP UP O O 39 21 6 BC 24.Ofi CONIC CURB ~I E~ h a b ~ PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. STOP LINE MAIN RD. & FACTORY 2100'' AVENUE - NOTE: 444 THERE ADJACENT PROPERTY PROPERTY BETWEEN NO CURB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH (IRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE MATTITUCK, NY NO MARLENE LANE Q" V SUFFOLK COUNTY -TAX -MAP v r =<v DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT r 1000 142 01 27 r 0 4 QV Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN P-1 SCALE: 1" = 201-0" ALL SIZE INFORNATO 6LL SIM Mra2 IS 6A4p UPON Scale: AS NOTED _ A SURVEY DATED 02/16/( IRYEY DA MB 02/16/0 /18/06, J 13 NO. UPON. RY: ~VOLLMUTH d VOUMMI 1 6RUSH 3 mpw-wn artmpo S,P2, f W IILY MM gEIN[ RIpXIryY. It>I~ fR1rc N xA ~ p„',,_ Drawn by: M.C. II .M vrin,•81d. xr. xr~°.e° r Sect Planting in accordance with Pzwewo.L.u Sad. VII, Landscaping, Table KEMPEY ENGINEERING PROVIDE STEEL CAP mi. w wnp VII - 3. o-la me° ' npr one. um~- ighWbcom. ~~pp~ iorc Ww 6" DIA. STEM BOLLARD arw. `a' Cbm. vlab (we block fon bow on ^ Lew eu a. 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY 6'A' LONGFILLED SOLID Pavw.w. now 1) trongt. around. WITH CONCRETE, P'RI.16 vWwrhW 2D coy y elr°pb ANDPAINT(3)COATS 3: INDUSTRIAL TYPICAL CONC. 10 - STREET REPAIR CURB GUTTER eeh with 3• WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 TOP OF EXTO ASPHALT SLATTED FABRIC DETAIL salon., car cover s' sob v.t m tumor PATCH AS RSQD (OR cn.M'IrGW me~+ra (trn•) ` P: 631.321.7777 TOP OPNBPYSLAB) : with wool "I Top ran j .Irt. TYPICAL CONCRETE CURB PLAN throw, el. FhWh.° seo.: 1-112'0 emu. -1/x• .INS end GUTTER & STREET REPAIR NOTEI F: 631.661.0486 F, r Tor InaI port 1-1/x• . talom 1. -R Length and width to be determines by the architect or ' th Twn.hu I Ind. n11.1.0 YY.e•o m°.r a up.,ly un. engineer as necessitated by the needs of the alto. The size is :hitect or v eize is w•. perWnx - n cod. Lx'•u°isiprx~fyiP a aubjaGq to ths~ approval of the Town Engineer @ Planning board. P r.,.s.xrapy,I 14" DIAM. x 3'-0" DEEP + de, In. se 009 PloSdilptlwY "i b°o`o. 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE POURED CONC. FOOTING 16• it 300D P.S.L CONCREEM in c.h(c.D.,wu LN'1. t: LlgwurlW,V TYwn rn W EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11 31 r I I ~ P. 631.368.3324 WIHYM Vi'I F. 631.368.1524 INDUSTRIAL A STANDARD STREET REET REPAIR CURB TYPICAL STREET CURBS i"jGATES REVISIONS: i STREET REPAIR DETAIL ~I 1 TYPCIAL BOLLARD DETAIL z BUFFER FENCE AND PLANTING DETAIL TAIL 3 a REFUSE ENCLOSURE DETAIL Date Description I No. j 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 SP-3 SCALE: ZI =1r-0N SP-3 SCALE: gt _ 11_Olr SP-3 NTS SP-3 z _ r II SCALE: a.. -1-0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS DATED 03/1 OS 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE 3 INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF •W.r.amu.. SOUTHOLD PLANNI G BD. ¢PLn..oolM1 HMIs wwwWw n.aa.u.O 7/23/09 WISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22109 uu.wa r.~d.uwr Dkobllity CuN Cul /.N..W nWW,pAlyb NQ!nA: ,.-0.pIhoM1lwyrwereuW mEbbmehrlWW Surnper truck mnsnwT.neemmwernwmv., 34n II II ed". rwrm x.-All xw°imurloer,W,dbaoaeMrwAr wawurawgtlwlknw wwr-vwe.wm V4trr ~ rVWwtlw,. II oc1yT~ We. u e,.. HANDICAPPED r•wIn e" nice .ww -OIIpWWI. LIST OF DRAWINGS: O 45' 5'-0' -•h•Is w .u msW O e.+.d..IUW the I Sheet Description PLAN PARKING SP-1 XEY MAP ow.rraW _ -SITE PLAN XNIDICMPEO SIGN r.rwr.w.rnr.wnov x.a-v..rxw.L.p I vwuwa.mr.r.y, O °tttlymond MAJOR TREE PLANTING BED I e N -PARKING CALCULATIONS 4' We blur nicking Blur Inb...crnel aewwY-Pq.weWmR Cw'WWY I -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS d-0' rymbwl br nmvs-w W wvwr~ a -SANITARY CALCULATIONS SkntlPN Stull occnrlbllity vW°I.u.r~v,.W.Wu -ZONING ANALYSIS XondlOOppN Word TR4FFIC Wore wy~p.~~W ra•.e.o.+eW wwya T 1' WWr °wPr ( rrr 1.. MppmWYWIwpp.•.WwxorMlouw Ioe•,wuWbu IarrkwP.rc ry.l'hmvv. SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN °l. 1) IWWPtl WWWmW,W-°Y1 Ml.. a-.•d.l owe eo W. -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE s -LANDSCAPE NOTES SECTION A-A OO Wl•Y NOTE: e" We rlrlpe O 13 1 4" LIGHTING NOTES 1. - For IWO Wooyy XOfik, b 45' $'-0' O.C. HdPplne to M Yrllow. - 7MMC FLDW so. nob SP-3 SITE DETAIL For Om mY lmitic, dropping W be whits. A-1 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS Ls1 STRIPING DETAIL MaVOR TREE (Snot n. for Mx or Tra bxcept xe nhawn hvtonj LT zrWW n lesson) ON SITE STORM DRAINAGE POOL LIGHT POLE DETAIL A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS S\Y~ SCALE: P-0"~-J SCALE: 4" =1'-0 ~-J NTS SP-3 SCALE:" =1'-p" PH-Z •SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN These plans are an instrument of service and are the property of the of Engineer. infringements will be prosecuted. Contractors shall verify all field condillons and cilms ons and shall be responsible for held fit and quality of vrork. No allowances shall be made on behalf of the 20 12 Contractor for anyemor or neglect AdJoioivp lv9amotlmLmllop 1 l~nme~~.lw. on his pad. SEAL Project OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, 0 o INC. Counter Slope of Surfaces Adjacent to Curb Ramps 320 FROST POND ROAD OLD BROOKI%ILLE,NY NTS CMDtONIbVREo l11 1, EIM sr •ee PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. •ee TaAEnceuE v MAIN RD. & FACT.& Y' N WLEI Y _ q$ ~.EImOEDdI CLIYE n.ovLOa rv '1 TDN. 'D4 LILLXaOPIPC AVENUE - EQUNAI.@l'f PfIOlAO OEEQUIVAL&lf III'/1' PITCI?fUl2'/1' MATTITUCK, NY TAD nuLmm Luxe. SUFFOLK COUNTY -AP 122. 7 1 ' 7' E?i IST. SEC. BLK. LOT 0 00 142 01 27 pIUW LWLI:IOLmLLbp Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. 9 SIDES OF CURB RAMPS lp CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK u TYPICAL GREASE TRAP 1z TYPICAL ]LEACHING POOL Scale: AS NOTED SPaaaaa3 SP3 SCALE: a' =1'An SP-3 SCALE: 2' SP-3 SCALE: =1'-p" SP-3 SCALE: 4'= T'-p" i Drawn by: M.C. i KEMPEY ENGINEERING 441 = N co)) 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY ti~ W ~Um v ok Q ~S= 3Q WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 n~ 04 P: 631.321.7777 o C. [v ~ O k h (7 Lo F: 631.661.0486 u ~S ry U In Ur) ti 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE N m LI HT EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 ~O aC 6.17 0 P. 631.368.3324 V 13 cc"o F. 631.368.1524 j ONl~wAY ~Q *c PROP. ELEVATED ~m M oo w~ "7-ELEVEN" SIGN SEE DETAIL TYPICAL TRUCK DEr X DETAIL REVISIONS: s .011 STOP ry ' a~ SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" N/F 25.98 N 249 SQ,FT. DEDICATION c~ MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC Date Description No. FOR FUTURE TURNING $ k 7 RADIUS IMPROVEMENTS' 5/18/09 NEW DRAWING AS PER COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE STOP N n 26.15 9 LIGHT a g~ TC 15.73 ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) SC i8,32 USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD A 2b. /6 hV u m W 1 EXISTING CURB CUT TO BE 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BD. COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 I 49 AS PH ALT PAfl KlNO k kN ~OO° REMOVED ST NG SANE D NOTE NO. 5 MATCH CROSSWALK xx BC 25.65 X 5.95 IX 'T)y RLIIAIININOWALL: y6 N 4$'57!30" E . 146. 0 MST. A CRATE TC 26.10 X X Y OR EXISTING NATURAL VEOFATION BEGINING MARKER J 25 0704 1528.57 LIST OF DRAWINGS: 26,95 25.39 3 Sheet Description (n SP-1 -KEY MAP PROP. 7-ELEVEN BLDG. F7 71 -SITE PLAN A~ ® W _ -PARKING CALCULATIONS DETAIL OF CORNER RADIUS Z ul -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SANITARY CALCULATIONS SCALE: 1" =10'-0" ~~i puoy~Nryn CARS GE T -ZONING ANALYSIS CAR9 ONLY Y (QW. (Ott. A) SP-2 -LANDSCAPE PLAN LLB®® ® 6 5 F. PR P D A D 11 ION A 5 P N ALT PA R K I NO •LANDSCAPESCHEDULE N N° ! RETAINING WALL -LANDSCAPE NOTES -LIGHTING NOTES a $Y3' i @y,~ LIGHT N"4 0 Y ~ Rn1a SP-3 -SITE DETAIL 0 0p 0®®®® gee EXIST. SP-4 -TRUCK ROUTE PLAN & DETAILS BUILDING O ®;;1 '~~zS o ® . o v POLE MouN1EO PROPOSER LCROSS SP-S -TRUCK ROUTE PLAN & DETAILS SLONAOE EMPLOYEE }1 . OP ESS WTURE ACCESS TO R055 10 AOJACEM PARKING ONLY (Ott, Z) N PflOPER1Y >c, a•n5'° ` '(D 9004 °OO 90000000 A-1 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS ,Hr i A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS 5C'PS 59.17 : I I I I V/JA TC 20M fi'm° p Wr •filW 'SSF TC 20.40 PaOP. ']-ELEVEN T P IG SICN Wow 4go =m FT 0 u6nr u T These plans are an instrument of ryrv5 ®0 ^m GRASS/ TOP 501 ® ee eee _ eee ®0 GRASS/ TOP SOIL AND SE' ING p j service and are ine property of the Engineer. Inhlng~,ments will be / e pi prosecuted. O ' " Eg5T.6 BDEH 'ST.6' S198.00 EXIST. B" TREE m ° 57 3 Q pI W %IST.e' Bu 8 EXIST,B' .h. r TO 28.]1 (m] EXIST, 10' BUSH TO 21,01 E%1 CGNC SIOEWALN '(D 1~ t Contractors shall vertly all field r TO 26.63 TO 28.10 BC 26$3 DEDICATION TOP EXIS NYT344 GW EXIST^ SON ME GOV shall conditions and dimensions and FUTURE TURNING PMNS IMPRCVFNENR x TC 20.62 IC 23.0E CGNC C RB GU ifs' O shall be e responsible for fleltl Ia and quality of work. No allowances _ I; BC 24.60 _ TrC 24,07 UP shag be made on behalf of the I- YYI LINE BC 23,65 TC 23,38 8 20.04 Contractor for anyerror or negied GEL YELLOW LINE J MAIN T BD 20.47 u WNnE LINE (WIDTH VARIES) ROAD (5•R• 25) WTiIIE LINE on his part. SEAL P. O 0 1Y N /ll Project WHILE UNE E y `JV[ T U R NI NC LANE DBL ELLO LIN MAIN TOP JUNE TO EE !Ei DEL YELLOW LINE ROAD OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, NRIJ FXT. 70 ACCOWODATE FOR INC. PEDESTRIAN WMINAY OW YE (NYSDOT R.O.W,) WHIN (ROUTE 25) rMITE NNE (VARIABLE WIDTH 320 FROST POND-ROAD` C 2& 9 BO 2155 SO 25.54 TO 26. CONIC CURB GOING CURB Bc 24!) TC 24.53 ) 26.16 BC 24M OLD BROOKVI'LLE,NY. p UP P UP O O I} 6 CGNC CURB Tom; 9!~ I I \ PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. STOP LINE 11 MAIN RD. & FACTORY, NOTE: AVENUE " THERE ARE NO CURB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH FIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE m ADJACENT PROPERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE NO MARLENE LANE Q- MATTITUCK, NY i' SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX: "MAP x DIST. SEC. BILK. LOT x a 0 1000 142 01 27 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no, 1 TRUCK ROUTE PLAN ~V P4 SCALE: 1 " = 20'-0" ALL SITE INFORBARON A SURVEY BATED 02/16/08 ALL 91E NFORMAION IS Be UPON Scale: AS NOTED My C _ Y LDAWD IMO 02/I6/0 L/OB, JOB NO. NO. DOOM. B1. ,1`1J ~VOLLMUTM tr ` VOLLMUTN mamo- n Al ~WC NINI pENll[ UWC NINI 611Etr aeusN MIMiMY. 11)1\ LYM (W~TM ~ w ' 2 _ Drawn by: M.C. i KEMPEY ENGINEERING V 19 m~a ) N 8' Z 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY U WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 J hV 2 3~ c IV O P: 631.321.7777 ' h~ v m o ~ L F: 631.661.0486 2~ U, ~Z ry U 14- o ~tio 0 Lr) 3 co 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE LI HT EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 0 P. 631.368.3324 ~O om 6.17 0 co .13 v F. 631.368.1524 ~ w 4Yi~ NiQ M2rye ^d^. w^IY :mV 4Q NN PROP. ELEVATED `w^Y tim o N~ "7-ELEVEN" SIGN TYPICAL TRUCK DEr SEE DETAIL ',K DETAIL, REVISIONS: SCALE: I" 201-0" = -0 t' STOP ry k N/F Date Description No. 25.98 N 249 SQ.FT. DEDICATION a~ 4rV 37 MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC n ^u~ h FOR FUTURE TURNING iu 5/18/09 NEW DRAWING AS PER COMMENTS & 0) C9 RADIUS IMPROVEMENTS & ec iei's ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE STOP N n 26.15 9 LIGHT USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD U hm Q7~ 21 EA 2b. /b W 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BD. XISTING CURB CUT TO BE COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 k kN REMOVED STING SEED NOPATCHED TE NO, 50 MATCH LIL1S A S P H A L T P A R K I N G u CROSSWALK /~5.95 6C 25.65 x EXISTNG CONCRETE ~m RETAINING WALL 146.00 IXI QTq"'~ N 48'57'30" E EXIST. 0u~ Y OR CRATE ' TC 26.10 X x ~ EXISTING NATURAL VEGETATION LIST OF DRAWINGS: BEGINING MARKER 25 0704 1528.57 Q 26.95 25.39 3 W Sheet Description U) c F-1 7~ SP-1 -KEY MAP 0 -SITE PLAN 9NN` PROP. 7-ELEVEN BLDG.' O W U oe f^0 -PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS DETAIL OF CORNER RADIUS .4/ ® 01 -SANITARY CALCULATIONS PaIE MouM[o -ZONING ANALYSIS SCALE: 1'1 =101-011 ® m cmis SIGINKSM C0IAPALT cu+s ONLY (att. s) ® W) SF. PROF SED ADDITION SP-2 LANDSCAPE PLAN ASPHALT PAR KI NO OsL •LANDSCAPESCHEDULE .2 f G CONCRETE RETANI -LANDSCAPE NOTES N ~ RETAINING WALL e m, _ -LIGHTING NOTES Q ® LIGHT O fl® Y NYH4 0 0 NYT14 0 ® 0® SP-3 SITE DETAIL , r V Nh' 0 ~ O 000®®0~9 TT SP-4 TRUCK ROUTE PLAN & DETAILS LBUILDING a a ~ zo°ffl u 4 0 SP-5 TRUCK ROUTE PLAN & DETAILS ` g 1 ® POLE MGGNTEO / A'//i J~ . a NONRE CROSSN S10NA9L EMPLOYEE ACCESS TO ADJACENT PARKING ONLY (Ott. 2) PROPERTY A-1 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS ff~O m•i~ ~-w}®W®4 ®W®®000 o I / / CHT 'V$N IT O .:tW',sGyu 4 TC 20.02 A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS e~ ,yam ~(e, 3IA. 's tgj :1 j * i TO 20.40 PROP. 'I [ELEVEN P ID SIGN ~GCD Ilm ~I]~ U.,, LIGHT uYllr These plena ere an Instrument of 0V `n7h / ® ®Q56 sea QI 040 0 00 a&& @so 0%0 0. &a service and are the property of the hom GRA55 MP 50 CRAM MR SOIL AND SE INC o yry, 1.-MET.5 BUSH 9O00 E%15i. B° THEE Engineer. Infringements will be prosecuted. ET,E, BU O fftl%lffiv ~ 8'57'3 TEASi6• BUSH IO o 'D YY '(D o E%IST.6• M t'~S EMIBi. 10• BUSH TC 21.01 Contractors shall verify ell field TO ze.Tl m 2e.lo C 28.56 E%I , CONO SID I ENS AA NYT341 CW MST. Sim TELE COV conditions and dimensions and shell be responsible for field fg and L ; BC 25.23 DWICAWDN van N RE TURNM WUB IMPRtl NENIM C TC 25,02 CON CU OU H 20.52 E UP O BC 2"0 TO 24.0 HN'CEY quallly of work No allowances shall be made on behalf of the ' 2 IT LINE BC R].Bp C 23. 396 TO 2084 .MAIN T~ I RATE BC 20.43 Contractor for anyefror or negied on his pad. S' EA,L DEL YELLOW LINE LL J (WIDTH VARIES) A® MIX LINE C WHITE LINE R S.R. 25) Project WHITE LINE %Jf DEL LLO DN TURNING LANE MAIN ROAD OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, G TCP NNE 10 !E !fl NRTMIA 9•AK R DBL YELLOW LINE INC. ACCOIM05AlE fO nE5E.0R1PN WSUMWY L YE OW E (NYSDOT R.O.W,) • WHIT TC 25.51 TC 25,09 TC 25.95 WHILE LINE (VAR(ROUTE 25) IABLE WIDTH) 320 FROST POND ROAD..-_----,.. BC 25. 9 BC 2158 BC 25.54 CONC CURB C 25.55 GONG CURB TO 25.32 e TO 24.53 2487 ec 14,De OLD BROOKVILLE;NY 25.15 i UP UP O O taut tune PROJECT: 7-ELEVEN, INC a h a ~ MAIN RD. & FA ym 2 O StW LINE ~ NOTE: 4,./ AVENUE THERE ARE NO CURB CUTS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH TIRE LENGTH ON MAIN ROAD FOR THE -Z~ AND MARLENE LANE Q MATTITUCK, NY. x ADJACENT PROPERTY BETWEEN SIGSBEE RD. AND MARLENE SUFFOLK COUNTY X~~IAP - ~ v G DIST. SEC. B K. LOT x i h 1000 142 01 27 J h 4 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. 1 TRUCK ROUTE PLAN P4 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" ~7 ALL SITE INFOMAnc A SUI BATED 02/18/4 ALL air Mr08N1110N IB BA5ED UPON IIP~EY U OAM IN 04/18/08, JOB NO N0. 08013, BY. ~vocuYUrH AT NO. 0601 Scale: AS NOTED SPmmmv15 vocururH h BRUSH r1),H PA' ~ILI'F PA' ~ILI'lOM IR'FIIIE ATI NdY W 3 emwe,cuxo semw X116 1)1! M1.4 ..ryM Drawn b -.21 y: M.C. H NEW 54"SQa -NEW 54"SQ.x 76"H DECORATIVE DECORATIVE CUPOLA KEMPEY ENGINEERING EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF NEW FACIA BOARD SIGN LIGHTS WITH SHINGLES ROOF SHINGLES TO NEW FACIA NEW NATURAL NEW 7-11 WOOD ANGLE REFLECTOR MATCH ADDITION BOARD SPLIT SHAKES CARVED WALL AT ALL GABLES SIGN SEE DET.3 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY EXIST, BLDG. W/ NEW WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION P: 631.321.7777 F: 631.661.0486 EXIST. BLDG. W/ O EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE NEW FACIA 610ARD 0 EL n 0 FACIA BOARD T TO MATCH ADDITION III 111T]i III I 1 11 11 11 MATCH ADDITION EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 P. 631.368.3324 F F. 631.368.1524 EXIST. BLDG. NEW HARDIPLANK NK SIDING IN LIGHT EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW HARDIPLANK SIDING IN c45i GRAY TONE LIGHT GRAY TONE REVISIONS: NEW 4' PRECAST CONC. LEDGE NEW 4' PRECAST CONC. LEDGE I Date Description No. Y 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS 00 DATED 03/13/08 NEW 6' CONC. CURB NEW 6" CONC. CURB 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & 3 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GRADE 6 GRADE NEW 10" SQUARE DECORATIVE NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, NEW MAIN ENTRANCE DOOf ENTRANCE DOORWAY NEW HARDIPLANK NEW PICTURE WINDOWS W/ WHITE TRIM 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS FROM TEE: INCORP. TOWN OF COLUMNS WITH 12" SQUARE NANTUCKET STYLE WITH W/ TRANSOM WINDOW ABC )M WINDOW ABOVE SIDING IN LIGHT GRAY & SDL DIVIDED LIGHT PANELS TYP. TONE ALL NEW WINDOW LOC. SOU THOLD PLANNING BD. STONE BASE, NP. B ALL 7 LOC. PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD STRIPE STANDARDS - STANDARD COLORS 3M FILM MATERIAL IATERIAL COMMENTS DATED 7/22109 A-RED C- GREEN 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 3680-53 (CARDINAL RED) 3680.68 (DARK GREEN) EQUIVALENT PMS # 1797 EQUIVALENT PMS # 342 A-1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" AVERY # 10836-7-11 RED AVERY # 10836-711 GREEN LIST OF DRAWINGS: B-ORANGE D- WHITE 3623 (BRIGHT ORANGE) Sheet Description EQUIVALENT PLAYS # 165 E-BRONZE AVERY # 10837-7 11 ORANGE PANTONE 19-1116 KEY MAP -SITE PLAN B A in SP-1 PARKING CALCULATIONS -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS B ~ ~ oo cV -SANITARY CALCULATIONS N ZONING ANALYSIS LEVEn N N -LANDSCAPE PLAN SP-2 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE A E -LANDSCAPE NOTES -LIGHTING NOTES E C A D M SP-3 SITE DETAIL NEW 54"SO.) 31-0" T-6" -NEW 54"SO.x 76°H A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS DECORATIVE DECORATIVE CUPOLA 10'-2" ,A-2 -EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS NV-7-41 WOOD WALL SIGN EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW _ SCAJE: 1/2" m V-0" EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO C-1 3I1E PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION MATCH ADDITION Ti so plans are an instrument of at.. Dios and are the property of the Errrlneer. Infringements will be „ t pit,secuted. Contractors shall verity as flew conditions and dimensions and shall be responslble for geld fit and N quality of work. No allowances `shall be made on behalf of the Contractor for anyerror or neglect EXIST. BLDG. W/ FACIA BOARD TO on his pad. SEAL NEW FACIA BOARD " EXIST. BLDG. W1 NEW MATCH ADDITION TO MATCH ADDITION GAMA DEER PARK, E+ EXIST. BLDG. W/ INC. NEW HARDIPLANK EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW SIDING IN LIGHT HARDIPLANK SIDING IN 320 FROST POND ROAV n GRAY TONE LIGHT GRAY TONE OLD BROOM LE-;NY 1 NEW SERVICE ENTRACE DOOR 7-ELEVEN, INC. Y MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVENUE L NEW 6" CONC. CURB MATTITUCK, NY NEW 6" CONC. CURB GRADE SUFFOLK COUNTY,<-TAX .:_MAP GRADE 6 SEC. BILK. LOT 142 01 27 Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. 2 NORTH ELEVATION AS NOTED A-1 SCALE: I/4" = V-0" M.C. I~ H NEW 54"SO.x 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA KEMPEY ENGINEERING i NEW GOOSENECK NEW ROOF EXIST EXIST, BLDG. W/ NEW 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY SIGN LIGHT WITH SHINGLES ROOF ANGLE REFLECTOR MATCI ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 P: 631.321.7777 NEW NATURAL SPLIT SHAKES F: 631.661.0486 AT ALL GABLES EXIST. BLDG, W/ NEW ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH ADDITION 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 NEW 7-11 WOOD CARVED WALL SIGN BEYOND all I 1 -1 111 11111 wl~ P. 631.368.3324 F. 631.368.1524 So EXIST. BLDG. W/ NEW A NEW FACIA BOARD NEW HARDIPLANK FACIA BOARD TO SIDING IN LIGHT MATCH ADDITION GRAY TONE EXIST, BLDG, W/ NEW REVISIONS: NEW 10" SQUARE HARDIPLANK SIDING IN N DECORATIVE COLUMNS WITH 12" SQUARE LIGHT GRAY TONE STONE BASE, TYP. O Date Description No. V ALL 7 LOC. NEW 4" PRECAST CONCRETE LEDGE 10/10/08 REVISED AS PER INCORPORATED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMENTS 2 DATED 03/13 08 NEW 6" CONC. 03/02/09 REVISED AS PER COMMENTS & CURB NEW 6" CONC. CURB BEYOND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE 3 GRADE INCORPORATED TO OF SOUTHOLD GRADE 4/13/09 REVISED AS PER 3/24/09 COMMENTS NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, FROM THE INCORP. TOWN OF NANTUCKET STYLE WITH PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. SOUTHOLD PL G BD. 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 I 3 EAST ELEVAU N j A-2 SCALE: va" =10" LIST OF DRAWINGS: Sheet Description KEY MAP -SITE PLAN SP-1 PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS -SANITARY CALCULATIONS -ZONING ANALYSIS .LANDSCAPE PLAN NEW DECOR, NEW 54"SO.x 76"H DECORATIVE CUPOLA SP-2 -LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE -LANDSCAPE NOTES i -LIGHTING NOTES f SP-3 -SITE DETAIL EXIST, BLDG, W/ NEW NEW ROOF ROOF SHINGLES TO NEW GOOSENECK MATCH ADDITION SHINGLES SIGN LIGHT WITH A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS ANGLE REFLECTOR 'FT A n UA Om Aim vmnm K-G ruNu WrID1 tAXVA11UNh NEW NATURAL SPLIT SHAKES i PH- 1 -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN (F~~ AT ALL GABLES 61 EXIST. BLDG. W/ These plans are an instrument or :o NEW ROOF :o SHINGLES TO 5 m serAw and are the property of the / Engineer. Infringements will be / T'~ c - MATCH ADDITION prosecuted. u 11 NEW 7-11 WOOD CARVED WALL J Contractors shall verify all field r • ' ' SIGN BEYOND _ ' •(3 condlflona and dimensions and N shall he responsible for geld fit andj quality of work No allowances EXIST. BLDG. W/ shall be made on behalf of the 4 NEW FACIA BOARD a TO MATCH ADDITION °P NEW HARDIPLANK NEW FACIA BOARD °i Contractor for anyertor or neglect - N SIDING on his part. L EXIST. BLDG. W/ H NEW HARDIPLANK NEW 10" SQUARE DECORATIVE COLUMNSF SIDING IN LIGHT WITH 12" SQUARE GRAY TONE STONE BASE, TYP. GAMA DEER PARK, Y q, NEW 4" PRECAST ALL 7 LOC. INC. NEW 4" PRECAST CONCRETE LEDGE CONCRETE LEDGE 320 FROST POND ROAD OLD BROOKVIL'Le,NY NEW 6" GONG. NEW 6" CONC. CURB BEYOND CURB GRAD 6 GRADE 7-ELEVEN, INC.' NEW 'ELDORADO' STONE, NANTUCKET STYLE WITH MAIN RD. & FACT )VIA PRECAST CONCRETE CAP. AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY SUFFOLK COUNTY TA''. NM,AP~°--1 4 WEST ELEVATION SEC. BLK. LOT 142 01 27 A'2 SCALE: 1/4" = F-0" Date: 02.25.09 drawing no. AS NOTED A-2 M.C. Luminaire Schedule Project: Al Projects KEMPEY ENGINEERING Symbol Oly Label Arrangement Lumens LLF Oeeoription 6 Pavilon SINGLE 6500 0.720 Wall Light CC2SW-100 MH 11 Country Club SINGLE 14000 0.720 175 ..it Metal WWI. down like with flat Ian 640 SUNRISE HIGHWAY WEST BABYLON, NY 11704 Numeric Summary Luminaire Location Summary P: 631.321.7777 F: 631.661.0486 Project: All Projects Project: Al Projects Heightng Label ColcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min SagNo Label 2 4 BRUNSWICK DRIVE colalste Illuminanaa Fo 1,26 5.7 0.2 6.40 1 Country Club 20 EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731 2 Country Club 20 P. 631.368.3324 3 Country Club 20 F. 631.368.1524 aR~~fWxY 4 Country Club 20 REVISIONS: 5 Country Club 20 w W 6 Country Club 20 a N/F a MATTITUCK PLAZA LLC Date Description 8 No. 4/13/09 GENERATED AS PER 3/24/09 7 Country Club 20 ZONE: GENERAL BUSINESS (B) COMMENTS FROM THE INCORP. USE: WALDBAUM'S SHOPPING CENTER TO O SO O DP G D. 6 Country Club 20 m 7/23/09 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD S ~ ASPHALT PARNING COMMENTS DATED 7/22/09 9 Country Club 20 U I N 4805 '30" E 146.00 10 Country Club 20 0.7 '0,9 1,2 °1.7 '1.3 '0,9 0,9 01.3 01,7 '1.2 0.9 '0.6 00.4 '0.5 '0 6 11 Country Club 20 LIST OF DRAWINGS: 0.? 12 Pavilon 12 x~ 0l 1.6 2.2 '4.0 25 1.0 01.6 2.5 4.0 0,8 '08 J Sheet Description o. € °3.Y 3.0 z 3J 1.0 °1.0 °1 0 ^ 13 Pwllon 12~ 0' / 4- SP-1 .KEY MAP o~ .SITE PLAN 14 Pavilon 12 2.1 '5.1 PROP, 7-ELEVEN BLDG, 0 -PARKING CALCULATIONS 15 Povilon 12 0 '0 46 '1 5 0 2.2 1,2 q.~ -DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS °4tl22f 6 "'{,3 °4.7 '31 (J1 -SANITARY CALCULATIONS 16 Pavilon 12 E 6 '1.6 a 0.5 10 .0// ^9s °5.6 2 m -ZONING ANALYSIS 685 R POSED ADDI 11) I / SP_2 LANDSCAPE PLAN 17 Povilon 12 .fi .fi 3.0 4.9 '1.6 ° 6 .5 '27 °1 9 •LANDSCAPESCHEDULE J2 -LANDSCAPE NOTES £`S OP 8 .8 37 ' 9 2.1 '1.0 2. .5 '2.5 2.5 2,5 2, 61,0 °0.6 ° .2 ,0 °1.5 -LIGHTING NOTES OP 5.1 0.9 '1.3 '1.7 '1. 0.9 '0.8 °2.3 °4.7 ,I SP-3 -SITE DETAIL ~ P A-1 -NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS 6 7 9 5.7, 3 2 3 '0,6 °0,8 °7.0 7.3 0,6 °0,8 °0,0 °1.0 °0.8 °0.8 '0.8 °0.8 O A-2 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS 2.6 ° .3 0,4 °O,6 0,8 0.8 0.6 0, 5 0.7 0.9 0,7 0,9 0.7 '0.6 o i.6 PH- I SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN j 6 .4 0.6 ° .7 '1.1 2L5 '1,2 1,0 '1.8 I 2.5 ,9 2,5 9 2,0 / / 4j, 4. 2.2 2.6 !.2 2.6 '1.6 4 '1.1 2. 5.6 (.7 20 '1.4 3.., S6 `5,6 3.7 .6 '2.5 TOP i 4.2 Tt = 4.2 2.1 0.7 0.9 '1.9 4.2 3.1 1. '1,1 41,2 3. `11.6 .6 13. '5.5 '2.4 These plans are an Instrument of service and are the property of the r r ° .6 1.6 4 ° 7'30" 9 0 '2.3 '1 Engineer. Infringements will be O Prosecuted. Contractors shell verify all Nekl/ dDLs conditions and dlmenelona end ~ i ~ L?„- .f( - shall be responsible for field mend o quality of work. No allowances Y shall be made on behalf of the Contractor for anyemor or neglect DEL YELLOW LINE J (wmrx VARIES) ROAD (S.R. 25) on his part. SEAL a I WHITE LINE MA9N o Project WHITE LINE v TURN INC LAN E DEL LLO UN c T STOP UINE TO BE 9E1 ORL YELLOW LINE MAIN ROAD NRNM w TO '10 .7 OWNER: GAMA DEER PARK, PEOEVITPAN WN AY L YE OW E INC. WRITE TC 26.51 TC 25.09 SIC 2 WTIITE LINE (NYSDOT R.o.W,) (ROUTE 25) C 55 5..5 BC 25 9 BC 25.58 C 2`:nl CONC CURB 2fi,16 CONC Cup. TC 25az (VARIABLE WIDTH) 320 FROST POND ROAD 6C 24.6] TO 24,53 BC 21,08 OLD BROOKVILLE,NY 9 UP 25. %UP O CONC CURB - _ ,IN V .i~ STOP LINE a h h ~ 7-ELEVEN, INC. PROJECT: ~O a~\ r MAIN RD. & FACTORY dl!j 2 AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY I Q w SUFFOLK QQ - TAX I AP 2 2 DIST. SEC. BILK. LOT 2 J 1000 142 01 27 1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PL,--; Date: 4.13.09 drawing no. SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" ALL SITE INFORmom I .L SIM I iIPY IS BASE) UPON Scale: AS NOTED 1 A SURVEY OARED 02/it/On, U SAM 01/It/OE, .Ire NO. 0601], BY: VL7LCNUTN 4 eIOEFAxo s NUT11 It 1'L7U LC 11 ~ UTN 6RUSN ew¢Axo_wio smswo WIL l &'V FIREIOIMI.PoM I. NV &'V ~IIE PoM I.Y?IYf PHivism I ~uim 'vw11° fltiYl Wi1~MMi ;:;ate Drawn by: DLS