HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-7356A l
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO FROM
Bay Constables Elizabeth Cantrell
COMPANY DATE
Southold Town Bay Constable 10/18/2010
FAX NUMBER TOTAL NO OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER
765-2715
PHONE NUMBER SENDER'S PHONE NUMBER
765-2798 (631) 765-1892
RE SENDER'S FAX NUMBER
4730 Blue Horizon Bluff,Peconic (631)765-6641,
❑URGENT ❑FOR REVIEW ❑PLEASE COMMENT ❑PLEASE REPLY ❑PLEASE RECYCLE
NOTES/COMMENTS
Hello,
This is in regards to the phone conversation I had with Don&John today. The Building
Dept.received a complaint from a woman who is claiming that work is being done outside
all permits at the Vincent Curto property located at 4730 Blue Horizon Bluff,Peconic,
SCIW 74-1-35.54. The property owner is apparently digging out from underneath the
existing building as if to be replacing the foundation. This is not part of any permit issued
by the Board of Trustees,or by the Building Dept. Please investigate as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Elizabeth Cantrell
54375 MAIN ROAD
P0. BOX 1179
SOUTHOLD, NY 11971
o -
• ��
Jw
EX.WOOD PLATFORM AND
STAIRS TO REMAIN
SILL F15NCE AND o
�j / •Q —
HAYBALES,,
EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN
REPLACE EXISTING ROOF SHINGLES,SIDING,
WINDOWS AND DOORS
PROVIDE NEW GUTTERS AND LEADERSAND p
CONNECT TO NEW DRYWELL WITH 8'0 AD$PIPE-- _-
�oo�s��s
EX.WOOD DECK AND /
STAIRS TO BE REMAIN
"•1
_ NEW 10'0 X 7 DEEP DRYWELL
%TING STOCKADE FENCE AND FOR ROOF RUNOFF
LOSED SHOWER TO REMAIN ; '
File Edit View Toolbar Window Help
V n2r* 0 0 53 1�1--
i 74.-1-35-54 473009 Southold Active RISA School: Southold Schoo
Curto,Rose'V Rol!year: jAil Next yr Seasonal Fes/Wtrft LandAIV: 2,400
14730 Blue I-lotizon Bluffs Land Size.1.24 acres Total AV: 3,000
Parcel 74,-1-35,54. Owner Tay Bill Mailing Address 3rd Party Address Bank.
History ...........-
Total 2 Owners: To o en click the applo FIatC row 'R" ht Cllpk t
fikE!i� in oA
%,.-koAdd
Lj Assessment
Di'Spec Vincent A Cuirto Owner Type:Additional D&-ig Status.
D Description
k4 Owner(s)
r i fmages,
i� Cis z Last Name}Company: First Name: MI: JF-Sr-etc:
L� Site(1)Res 1purto Rose FN( F
Lj Sale02/28/01 Attention To/In Care Of:, Additional Address:
F
Street Ny Prefix Dir. Street Rural Route. St Suffix: Pos-tDir: UnitName: Unit No:
JlRd W]F
Po Bog No: CityiTown: State: Zip Code:
Puntington Station --
1—N—Y—� 117'$0-
Co ntry:
1j'4G-
Country: enter if not"USA" Ear Cd: Ownership:e.q.Life Use Owner Type:
FY
J
Ready
ww--i-jg W
"'M
SOUjy®l ..
0
Town Hall Annex Telephone(631)765-1802
54375 Main Road N Fax(631)765-9502
P.O.Box 1179 ® ��
Southold,NY 11971-0959
l�CoUNT'1,�
BUILDING DEPARTMENT,4 J. Y V^
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCT 20 2010
STOP WORK ORDER -------
Fa a rd
-FFaard
To: Rose V Curto (owner) and Richard J. Principi Jr. (applicanty -� M
4730 Blue Horizon Bluffs
Peconic, New York 11958
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED TO SUSPEND ALL WORK AT:
4730 Blue Horizon Bluffs, Peconic, New York
S.C.T.M. 1000-74-1-35.54
Pursuant to Section 144-8AM & 280-153 of the Code of the Town of Southold,
New York, you are notified to immediately suspend all work and building activities
until this order has been rescinded.
BASIS OF STOP WORK ORDER:
Going beyond scope of Building Permit#35879, issued 9/20/10
CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH WORK MAY BE RESUMED:
When Southold Town Trustees, Zoning Board of Appeals & Building
Dept. have issued approvals
Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply with the applicable
provisions of law may constitute an offense punishable by fine or imprisonment
or both.
DATED: October 20, 2010
George Gillen
Building Inspector
(cert. mail)
Jill M.Doherty,President y -' Town Hall,53095 Main Rd.
James F.King,Vice-President
u• rti P.O.Box 1179
Dave Bergen d Southold,NY 11971
Bob Ghosio,Jr. !�f¢ Telephone(631)765-1892
John Bredemeyer '' Fax(631)765-6641
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72
HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT
FOR A PRE-.CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE
CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT.
INSPECTION SCHEDULE
Pre-construction, hay bale line
1 st day of construction
Y2 constructed
/Project complete, compliance inspection.
p p
Jill M.Doherty,President *QF SO(/ry Town Hall Annex
James F. King,Vice-President O �Ie 54375 Main Road
Dave Bergen P.O.Box 1179
Bob Ghosio,Jr.
Southold,New York 11971-0959
G �
John Bredemeyer �� Telephone(631) 765-1892
`,oUS� Fax(631) 765-6641
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Permit No.: 7356A
Date of Receipt of Application: July 1, 2010
Applicant: Vincent Curto
SCTM#: 74-1-35.54
Project Location: 4730 Blue Horizon Bluff, Peconic
,Date of Resolution/Issuance: July 21, 2010
Date of Expiration: July 21, 201-2
Reviewed by: Board of Trustees
Project Description: To replace the existing roof shingles, siding, windows and
doors on the existing one-story seasonal cottage.
Findings: The project meets all the requirements for issuance of an
Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The
issuance of an Administrative Permit allows for the operations as indicated on the
site plan prepared by John J. Condon last revised July 27, 2010 and stamped
approved on August 2, 2010.
Conditions: The installation of gutters and drywells to contain stormwater run-off.
If the proposed activities do not meet the requirements for issuance of an ,
Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, a
Wetland Permit will be required.
This is not a determination from any other agency.
AA
Jill e�' Do�herty, Preside
BoTrustees
Board of Trustees 8 July 21,2010
they want to go to the DEC with anything.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Well, at this point they have a lot of other
issues on the property of clearing. I would rather move on it
and make a decision and then in the future if they come back
with something in writing from the DEC, then they can apply
again. We can deny without prejudice.
TRUSTEE KING: Sounds good to me. Any other comments?
TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: That sounds like a logical approach.
TRUSTEE KING: IT make a motion to deny this application
without prejudice and if they want to pursue this further they
would have to get something from the DEC to show us they are
allowed to do this under DEC regulations.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I'll second that. All in favor?
(ALL AYES).
TRUSTEE BERGEN: Number nine, Suffolk Environmental Consulting,
Inc., on behalf of HUGH SWITZER requests an Administrative
Permit to replace two existing cesspools of the rear of the
existing dwelling with new cesspools (inplace) and fully abandon
two cesspools off the rear of the existing garage. Located: 2700
Mill Road, Peconic.
This was an application where actually the Trustees back in
2004 considered identical application and approved it. The
application ran out without the work being done so they have
come back to request the same work to be done again. I went out
and looked at it. I have no problem with it. It's just
abandoning some cesspools that are close to the wetland and
installing new cesspools that are much farther landward of the
wetland. So I'll make a motion -- and it's found consistent
under the LWRP. So I'll make a motion to approve number nine.
TRUSTEE KING: Second.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: All in favor?
(ALL AYES).
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Number ten and eleven will be together. The
properties are right next door and it's the same consultant.
Number ten, Richard J. Principi, Jr., on behalf of GILDA PRINCIPI
requests an Administrative Permit to replace the existing roof, siding,
windows and doors and make inkind repairs to the existing framing as
necessary to an existing one-story seasonal cottage.
Located: 4690 Blue Horizon Bluff, Peconic, and;
Number 11, Richard J. Principi, Jr., on behalf of VINCENT CURTO
requests an Administrative Permit to replace the existing roof,
siding, windows and door and make inkind repairs to the existing
framing as necessary to an existing one-story seasonal cottage.
Located: 4730 Blue Horizon Bluff, Peconic.
For both descriptions --well, first of all, the LWRP
report, we don't have an LWRP report on this. This was applied
Board of Trustees 9 July 21, 2010
for in a different description and an LWRP report was done for
then, so another one I guess did not have to be done for this.
The Board has no problem with replacement of existing roof,
siding, windows and doors. The inkind repairs to the existing
framing as necessary is a little vague, so we questioned that as
far as fitting under administrative permit or whether it should
be a full permit process. Mr. Principi, I see you are here.
Can you please maybe elaborate on that description?
MR. PRINCIPI: Both cottages were inspected by the chief building
inspector and we are going to basically rebuild exactly--we
did his inspection -- it will allow some emergency repairs for a
few footings on this cottage and replace windows and door
openings exactly as they are; no expansions, no second floor.
The other thing we'll be doing is obviously, as per the site
plan, is drywell, gutters and revegetation on, obviously the
bluff and around any area around the foundation. That's
basically it. We'll stay exactly the same size, shape, he'll
inspect them and basically it will be a newer version of what is
there. That's the scope of the work.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Does the Board have any questions?
TRUSTEE KING: When you say replace the existing roof, do you
mean the whole roof or shingles?
MR. PRINCIPI: Just the shingles, maybe a few pieces of sheathing
where the second cottage, the roof system is in difficult shape.
The first cottage is re-roofing 100%. We won't disassemble
anything, we'll just rebuild the second cottage roof just to
kind of be to code.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: And rebuild it exactly the way, shape it is now
and not expand it.
MR. PRINCIPI: Exactly as per the plans, existing condition plans.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: While you are looking for the LWRP, I want to
agree with Jill that I have no problem with the as-described
replacing the roof, siding, windows and doors. The inkind
repairs to existing framing as necessary, I do believe also
requires a full wetland permit and review as a full Wetland
Permit. Because, I know, I believe part of the reason this
started was the new footings and pilings, concrete pilings were
put down for the one property there, I believe, the one that is
Gilda Principi?
MR. PRINCIPI: Yes.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: And I'm just concerned that we'll find entirely
new structures there. So I would feel more comfortable with
either this being better defined or a full Wetland Permit being
required for that part of this application. Again, I have no
problem with repair of existing roof, siding, windows and doors,
inkind. In other words no expansion of the doors, expansion of
Board of Trustees 10 July 21, 2010
the windows, just inkind.
MR. PRINCIPI: Same rough open, exactly the same. And this
cottage; obviously my uncle did those about 15 years ago,
emergency repairs there. The other cottage is I think is about
half a dozen spot footings that have to kind of, a couple of
girders are broken. But no machinery, all by hand.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Do you want to maybe have him go through the
full permit process and tighten up the description, make it a
little less vague?
TRUSTEE KING: I would be more comfortable with a full wetland permit.
MR. PRINCIPI: The description was going to be outlined in the
building permit as per Mike's inspection, but whatever you feel
will make you comfortable. It will be--
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: A lot of times when we have a description that
is a little vague, when we look back in history we say what did
we do; why was this done? Then something is out there that is
different than what is here. And we are trying on each
application to really tighten up.the descriptions and so both
parties and everybody knows when it goes passed on from you to
the Building Department to the contractor, that everybody is on
the same page. So we are concerned that this is not--
MR. PRINCIPI: So the description that was put forth in that
application is not clear enough? I mean, John, my engineer,
kind of drafted that up.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Yes, we want it, explain it, the inkind repairs
to the existing framing,just like you verbally explained to us,
maybe write that out a little more and also under the full
permit process, the neighbors get notified. So then they have
an avenue to come and review and give their comment.
MR. PRINCIPI: Just as we did the first time.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Correct. I'm sorry for, you know--
TRUSTEE BERGEN: Would the Board be comfortable segmenting this
out and allowing the administrative permit for the roof, siding, .
windows and doors, and that's it, or is it something the
applicant would feel more comfortable coming back in with a
Wetland Permit for the whole project?
MR. PRINCIPI: Honest, I have an understanding with Mike. He'll
inspect it during the process of the work. I don't know what
more I can say other than what is on the description, certified
by my engineer, but, how about if we, is the other cottage a
little bit more clear, that's just roofing, siding, gutters and
drywell, or do you need to keep them together?
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: They both have the same exact description.
MR. PRINCIPI: Right, it's exactly the same one. Except there is
no foundation work on the westerly cottage.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: The plans --
Board of Trustees 1 l July 21,2010
TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Mr. Principi, I think the Board's concern is
if we were to grant a permit as it lies now and it became
necessary to tear the structure down, we would be left without
recourse to hold the process up for a permit at that point,
which would create many problems for completing in one operation
your building construction. I think that's a concern. We don't
want to put you in a position to be disadvantaged --
MR. PRINCIPI: And I appreciate that. That's why Mike was nice.
enough to go out there and do his own inspection to see if it
was, you know, rebuildable as per our proposed scope of work,
and he basically, you know, verbally gave me a talk as far as
what can be done to that cottage in particular as far as footings.
TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: The "Mike" you are speaking of is the
building inspector?
MR. PRINCIPI: Yes, Mike Verity.
TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER:Would the Board consider the possibility of
a written report from Michael Verity in verification of his
findings? Obviously, the Building Department, we work with all
the time.
TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I don't know if he's in a position to decide
whether it's an administrative or full permit from the Trustees.
TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Understandably, but it may be with his
report we would be in a better position'to move this forward. I don't know.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: Again,that would not allow under the full
Wetland,Permit the opportunity for the neighbors to provide
comment. Again, I'll put forward my same request, a
recommendation that, if possible, we consider segmenting this
and approving the replacement of the roof, siding, windows and
doors, inkind.'And that would end the language for this
administrative permit. And if he wanted to do work beyond that,
he could come in for a full permit. That gives him the
opportunity to at least get doors, windows and a roof on it.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I have no problem with that. I just want to
know, too, on the plans, the scope of the work, it does say
repair/replace any rotted/damaged roof, wall or floor framing
inkind. Replace existing roof, windows, door, siding inkind.
Install new roof drywell. So that's a little more descript than
the actual description. So here we already have a little more --
MR. PRINCIPI: I think that's more reflective of this cottage
than the westerly cottage.
TRUSTEE GHOSIO: If we segment it, it will cost the applicant
more money, right? To me, you know, I would wait the month, do
a full application and save myself the money, but if you are all
right with it.
MR. PRINCIPI: I would just like to get started.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: When you say cost more money, it will cost him
n
Board of Trustees 12 July 21, 2010
to apply for a full Wetland Permit.
TRUSTEE GHOSIO: Yes, because if we segment it, obviously he
won't be able to do what he wants to do so.. He'll have to come
in for a full permit for the other one, then he'll have two
permits for the work for each cottage and it would cost more
money.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: I understand that. Correct. But what I'm
proposing at least allows him to button up the cottage, so to
speak, the roof, siding and windows, and that we have clearly on
our code as allowed for under administrative permit.
TRUSTEE GHOSIO: Sure, I'm just pointing out it would cost more
money, that's all.
MR. PRINCIPI: Would that be for both cottages?
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Yes, I think we feel the same about both
cottages. It's up to you how you want to proceed.
MR. PRINCIPI: Could you explain one more time?
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Sure, under our code we don't have a problem
with replacing doors,windows, roof, shingles, siding, under the
administrative permit. Some of that is even exempt, actually.
But then once you get into the other part of the description, we
feel it goes beyond the administrative, so that means replacing
the floor, the footings, all that we want to go under the full
process so we can take a better look at it.
MR. PRINCIPI: Well, in all fairness, I would agree on that, on
the second cottage. The first cottage I don't have to do
anything on the structure at all.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: So we can adjust the description tonight and
take out some of that wording.
MR. PRINCIPI: That's fine. And this one, in all fairness,
have to make about six or eight footing repairs, you know.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Okay, then we would need a plan reflecting what
that description is changed to.
MR. PRINCIPI: Okay, you mean for the second, this cottage.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: For the first. If we change the description
tonight for the first cottage, we need the plan to reflect that
description because in that plan you already have that you'll
change certain other things that we would not approve.
MR. PRINCIPI: The other option is a full Wetland Permit for the
both of them.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Right.
MR. PRINCIPI: So we can't get anything resolved here tonight.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: It's up to you. We can segment the application
and approve the windows, replacement of windows, doors, siding,
tonight, and then come back later for the rest of the stuff.
MR. PRINCIPI: Yes, at least I can get to work that way.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY:.Right.
Board of Trustees 13 July 21,2010
MR. PRINCIPI: If that's okay with the Board then I'll amend the
scope of work on the two cottages.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: But you would have to fill out all new
paperwork, all new application, new fee and everything for the other.
MR. PRINCIPI: If that's possible, I would to at least get
started.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: I would just recommend not approving these
together, do it separately.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Yes, we have to do two separate resolutions.
All right, if that's okay with you, that's how we'll move on it.
TRUSTEE KING: I would rather see -- I'm a little concerned
about the coastal erosion hazard line, too. It shows it right
at the seaward side of the house there. The coastal erosion
hazard line is ten feet wide, so which side of the coastal
erosion line do they use, the seaward side or the landward side?
If it's the seaward side, coastal erosion hazard line goes right
through that little house.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: Just to clarify for the record, we are looking
at the plan,for the house labeled as Principi, not Curto.
MR. PRINCIPI: I just had verification from my surveyor about the
width. Jim is right about the ten foot. I questioned it
myself, and he did an overlay and GPS, whatever he did, and he
gave an affidavit to verify and certify that work. But you have
to be comfortable with his information.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: All right—
TRUSTEE KING: It just shows it is a line. It doesn't show it at
the ten foot width, so l don't know which side of the ten foot
is on the survey.
MR. PRINCIPI: It's the northeast corner that was in question.
That's what I had him go out and reconfirm.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: All right, I'll go ahead and make a motion,
number ten, Gilda Principi, I'll make a motion for the
administrative permit to replace the existing roof, siding,
windows and doors and subject to a survey just reflecting that.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: Survey or set of plans?
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Set of plans, because we already have the
survey in the file.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: Correct.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Replacing the existing roof, shingles, siding,
windows and doors. The roof shingles, existing roof shingles,
. siding, windows and doors. And if the roof has to come off and
a whole new roof, that goes on to a full permit. If you have to
tear that out then you have to stop and wait for the full permit.
MR. MCGREEVEY: Is there any stipulation for gutters and leaders
going to drywells on this application?
TRUSTEE BERGEN: That's a very good point. Thank you, Jack.
d
a ,
Board of Trustees 14 July 21, 2010
MR. PRINCIPI: They were designed and drywells were calculated.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: It's shown on the survey here. Thank you, for
mentioning that. Subject to gutters, leaders and drywells.
Thank you, Jack. Do I have a second?
TRUSTEE BERGEN: Second.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: All in favor?
TRUSTEE KING: I'm still uncomfortable. I'm going to vote no
(Trustee Doherty, aye. Trustee Bergen, aye. Trustee Ghosio, aye.
Trustee Bredemeyer, aye). (Trustee King, nay).
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Let the record reflect Jim voted nay. The
motion is carried four to one.
Number 11, Richard Principi on behalf of Vincent Curto, resolved
to approve the administrative permit to replace existing roof,
shingles, siding, windows and doors, subject to gutters, leaders
and drywells.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: Including gutters, leaders and drywells,
correct?
MR. PRINCIPI: They should be on that too, right, Jill?
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Yes, I believe they are. And showing the new
plans reflecting that description.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: I'll second that.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: All in favor?
TRUSTEE KING: Same vote, nay.
TRUSTEE GHOSiO: I'm voting nay on this also. The scope is a
little different than the other one.
(Trustee Doherty, aye. Trustee Bergen, aye. Trustee Bredemeyer,
aye). (Trustee King, nay. Trustee Ghosio, nay).
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Let the record show that the'motion was
approved three to two.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: And Trustee King and Trustee Ghosio voted no.
V.APPLICATIONS FOR EXTENSIONS/TRANSFERS/ADMINISTRATIVE
AMENDMENTS:
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Applications for extensions, transfers and
administrative amendments. A lot of these are just regular
procedure extensions. We reviewed each file and I'm going to
lump a few of them together.
Number one, DROUZAS REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP., requests a
One-year Extension to Wetland Permit#6943, as issued on August
20, 2008. Located: 54120 County Road 48, Southold.
Number two, GARY GUJA requests a One-Year Extension to Wetland
Permit#6947, as issued on August 20, 2008. Located: 372 North
Drive, Mattituck.
Number three, Garrett A. Strang, Architect, on behalf of PAUL
BENTANCOURT, requests a One-Year Extension to Wetland Permit
Jill M.Doherty,President `OguFFO(,�c
Y Q D P.O.Bois 1179
James F.King,Vice-President Gyp Southold,NY 11971
Dave Bergen Gp ti Telephone(631)765-1892
Bob Ghosio,Jr. y Fax(631)765-6641
John Bredemeyec
Southold Town Board of Trustees
Field.Inspection/Worksession Report
Date/Time:
Richard J. Principi, Jr. on behalf of VINCENT CURTO requests an Administrative
Permit to replace the existing roof, siding, winidows and doors and make in-kind
repairs to the existing framing as necessary to an existing one-story seasonal
cottage. Located: 4730 Blue Horizon Bluff, Peconic. SCTM#74-1-35.54
Type area to be impacted:
_ altwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland So nd Bay
Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland
Part of Town Code proposed work falls under:
_Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other
�
Type of Application: wetland 'Oastal Erosion Amendment
Administrative . Emergency Pre-Submission Violation
Info needed:
Modifications:
Conditions:
Present Were: J.King Doherty_J. Bredemeyer . Bergen_
B.Ghosio, D. Dzenkowski other
Form filled out in the field by "
Mailed/Faxed to:
Date:
--
xnun rm va.xa �•. u.) MmRCm .
01-12.0 Y - 5EE SECW b'^ • �•1 l511U SFE SE NL
01-ID-ODI F 1.USC )� DW-0}00) 'A v.va 4TA 061-040fe S, Y,+'J
5-17.0 R5tau 1 J iiiml r+ A -
De-OOA-O
I 0 Soo
•J
I-
I1 706 �
1-m-m
a O A,
140A1q o ',
'P IOSAW
It, 9y TO)N a Sa11110.LryI.1-E
IR
3
)S
6BAAIU 4 \P 0 •� yY 340A ,C,T
Ile
p� TOM a sanxan
DM1nvM vS,L �q, R \ 0
O 15
.J Y s nvEmrt,r aKrsi 1
30 SPA
ISTAIU i'�J Qo. 1
r y 8
W 3
10.1 , SFE YC.1D.
SiWcl
Oefi-OS-D011
11 }J Eax M1.16
UA 1. M1YM1VS SEE SE4 M1
11{-I ]AA Deb-01-0011
�I
Ix.l M1,J
$ 3 69bA YA
ilP f4L A6 i011 fKl.A6
�Q S LWIU iai fm.16 SEE SEC 16 SEE SFG A4
It° ♦ OSfi-03.ODr BS-03-0013 De6-01-015
w m
-- wlUl llff
FO \ SEE SEG AA Da s[cwen SFE SEC rL OeS
9/1
,NOTICE o COUNTY OF SUFFOLK SOUTNDLD SECTION NO
e .AnIMADa,uTEPA,O fi EDT e a Red Property Tax Service Agency Y n „MRa
C I,m,,,a o a„m,�,w —_.—_ — —_ D¢Tnartnxa Arrr vonTMaia
G Canh tooter Riv°rheac�N T ll901 P.
StllE M iEErA
p r,... a �13.1 A m1m A IDDD
aAE raaEarr m sEn,a Amer. P PROPERTY MM
L— iorm¢cl miE,.n.D,,n1, —J
4j( S^ 1
it
Y.. .
IA"I
- Ir Olga
�I kr
y
5: � � � �� ■rr�� g err�,�r
MARTIN D. HAND; L�.
-' Licensed Land Surveyor
26 SIL VERBR 0 OK DRIVE
FLANDERS N.Y.
11901
Wem6er. Nassau-SuffoCkCivi[Engineers,Inc.
XewTorfi StateAssociation of(i'rofessiona(LandSurveyors
ConsuCtants, ® UTown
PX09VrE--(631)369-8312
Donald M.Hand P.EFAX---(631)369-8313
Licensed in N.Y.,N.C.,Fla.&GA.
Kathleen M.Hand P.E
Licensed in N.Y.,N.J.&NV
June 25, 2010
Subject:
Coastal Erosion Hazard Line mapping
Location:
S.C.T.M. DIST. 1000 SEC. 74 BLK. 01 LOT 35.54
Lot 4 Blue Horizon Bluff Job No. 2010-121
Owner: Vincent Curto
Base map:
Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Map
Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York
Photo NO. 57-556-83
Sheet 6 of 49
Format:
TIFF file (image quality: Poor, inherent to aerial photo)
Software:
PCSurvey with Base Map Digitzer
Method:
Spline line boundary of existing structure for scaling of image to proper size and
dimensions of existing structure.
Coastal Erosion Hazard Line as depicted scales with a width of approx 10'.
The existing structure appears to fall approximately 6.5' and 2.5' landward of the
Coastal Erosion Hazard Line as scaled on the west and east seaward side corners
of the structure respectively from the depicted center line of the Coastal Erosion
Hazard Line.
The image quality and the width of the depicted Coastal Erosion Hazard Line
create variations of its location. All dimensions scaled from the Area map are
approximate. The averages of all locations used for scaling purposes are used to
insure to not create a favorable or unfavorable result.
r d14y
V
Town of Southold
Board of Trustees Application
Office Use Only
_Coastal Erosion Permit Application �-----�
_Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit nv/]
_Amendmenttrransfe tension
✓ deceived Application: 7 I /0
Received Fee:$ 5"D J U L - 1 2010
_Completed Application
_Incomplete
_SEQRA Classification: Southhold Town
Type I Type II Unlisted Board Of Trustees
Coordination:(date sent)
_LWRP Consistency Assessment Form
_CAC Referral Sent:
_Date of Inspection:
_Receipt of CAC Report:
_Lead Agency Determination:
_Technical Review:
_Public Hearing Held:
Resolution:
Name of Applicant j%j (',�%►5_r C1VZt Q
Address Y�/ (,C- oV &AiQ #Tj J i'n)6 2 6)
2 Z�Z- Phone Number:( )
Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 79 na j—S „�
Property Location: r,i Lv - #OL
(provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location)
AGENT: ,el CM44
(If applicable)
Address: 00, c,3C JG�TI�L-0���q 7�
Phone:
G31-7
Curto Cottage Improvements
Project Description
June 29, 2010
The applicant proposes replace the existing roof, siding, windows and doors and
make in-kind repairs to the existing framing as necessary to an existing one-story
seasonal cottage.
Board of Trustees Application
GENERAL DATA
Land Area(in square feet): (0 21,?,-a a
Area Zoning: A2 y-0
Previous use of property: Fig e-
Intended use of property:
Covenants and Restrictions: Yes 1,1"4No
If"Yes",please provide copy.
Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals Yes
If"Yes",please provide copy of decision.
Prior permits/approvals for site improvements:
Agency Date
�o prior permits/approvals for site improvements.
Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency?
No Yes
If yes,provide explanation:
Project Description(use attachments if necessary): 5gw6
]-_._ ,td of Trustees Application
WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA
Purpose of the proposed operations: /W[�9 cre
e
1NP►�DO�� Air c1��S � &__g J STD
7
Area of wetlands on lot:_ 4773 square feet
Percent coverage of lot: 7,7 %
Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland
edge of wetlands: 2-1 feet
Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland
edge of wetlands: 71 feet
Does the project involve excavation or filling?
_ -No Yes
If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards
How much material will be filled? 0 cubic yards
Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet
Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: JNIA
Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: /v
Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal-waters of the town that may result by
reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate):
NO n�06 u E /M_&cZ� C Uo&aC IV 7Z.jL
-&4115?-4 S 65r- Ewa A J72c4 1 0rV�-4
eosk Town of Southold
z
Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM
PROPERTY LOCATION: S.C.T.N.t. THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A
1a �(,bp 7a� O As4 STORM WATER,GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN
-buffc—t Section o—c --EFL CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
SCOi'E OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ITEM# / WORK ASSFa9Sww Yes No
a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? Will this Project Retain All Storm-Water Run-Off
(Include Totai Area of all Parcels located within Z Generated by a Two(2°)inch Rainfall on Site?
the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) (s.F.rAaes) (This item will include all run-off created by site ✓ F
b. What is the Total Area of Land Clearing clearing and/or construction activities as well as all
and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed �� �� _ Site Improvements and the permanent creation of
construction activity? 40impervious surfaces.)
(S.F./Aces)
PROVIDE-BRIEF PROJFLT DFSCRIPTION (Pro+ddeAdcd�Pagesa9Needed) 2 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey Show c Proposed
Drainage Structures indicating Size$Loation?This ❑
Item shall include all Proposed Grade Changes and
fS77A)6 ! slopes controlling Surface Water Flaw.
i 3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion /
5/Q/ (gi W/,J &.J1 .J� CJU R-5'- and sediment control practices that will be used to (/
control site.erosion and stdrm water discharges. This
/4 U— AI f D���G(� Q /tad F item must be maintained throughout the Entire
/� / Construction Period.
I(yAJ0Fr W t� u T TGit, !--AO-W 5 4 Wilt this Project Require any Land Filling,Grading or
Excavation where there is a change to the Natural
D .4 550L &739 ____D/A-0 Co. Existing Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards _
of Material within any Parcel? /
Will this Application Require Land Disturbing Activities /
Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand
(5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface?
6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the
Site? Is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction
General DEC SWPPP Requirements: or within One Hundred(1 OW)feet of a Welland or El
Submission of a SWPPP Is required for all Construction activities involving soil Beach?
disturbances of one(1)or more acres. including disturbances of less than one acre that 7 Will there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes
ate part of a larger common plan that win ultimately disturb one or more acres of land. which Exceed Fifteen(15)feet of Vertical Rise to El
i/
Including Construction activities involving soil disturbances of less than one(1)acre where One Hundred(100')of Horizontal Distance?
the DEC has determined that a SPDES permit is required for storm water discharges.
(SWPPP's Shall meet the Minimum Requirements of the SPOES General Permit 8 Will Driveways,Parking Areas or other Impervious
for Storm Water Discharges from Construction activity-Permit No.GP.0-10.001.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm-Water Run-Off ❑ V
1.The SWPPP shall be prepared prior to the submittal of the NO].The NO)shall be into and/or in the direction of a Town right-of-way?i
submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction activity. Re
2.The SWPPP shall describe the erosion and sediment control practices and where 9 Will this Project Require the Placement of Material, /
required,post-construction storm water management practices that will be used and/or Removal of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any E]
constructed to reduce the pollutants in storm water discharges and to assure Item Within the Town Right-of-Way or Road Shoulder
compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit In addition,the SWPPP shag Area?(This item wnl NOT Include the Installation of Driveway Apron)
Identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the
quality of storm water discharges. NOTE- if Any Answer to Questions One through Nine is Answered with a Check Mark
3_All SWPPPs that require the post-construction storm water management practice in a Box and the construction site disturbance Is between 5,000 S.F.&1 Akre in area,
component shall be prepared by a qualiffed Design Professional Licensed in New York a Storm-Water,Grading,Drainage&Erosion Control Plan is Required by the Town of
that is knowledgeable fir the principles and practices of S[onn Water Management. Southold and Must be Submitted for Review Prior to issuance of Any Building Permit.
(NOTE: A Check Mark(./)and/ar Answ for eac h Question is Required lore Complete Apgirafim)
STATE OF NEW YORK,
COUNTY OF...........................................SS
. .1.C1.17a.�...�:....19.no.a.pi,..........being duly sworn,deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Permit;
�-4111sme of Individual slgmrhg Document) f
And that he/she is the .. . .....................................................
ne,Contratito,A ent,Corporate QfOcar,etc.)
Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authorized to perforn �' the said work and to
make and file this application;that all statements contained in this application are tru �6� and belief;and
that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. No.01ST6164005
Sworn to bef re me this; Qualified in Suffolk Count
Commission Expires April 9,2 —
• .......Zblo- �KU
..day of-...l l M
...............,20.& - -
Notary .° .....!../..... ......... ... ......... . .. .....................
(Sigma re of Applicant) ^moo -
FORM - 06/10
PROJECT ID NUMBER 617.20 SEAR
APPENDIX C
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
PART 1 -PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor)
1.APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2.PROJECT NAME
1PROJECT LOCATION:
Municipality Pa QA §)V 7WVZ4 County Sv F7coz_/z
4.PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersections. Prominent landmarks etc -or provide maD
i q0 Ivy. A Mo �'! !� �1 "S Z41viF
5.IS PROPOSED ACTION: ❑ New ❑Expansion Modification/alteration
6.DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
PLAc� Ak iST/,-)6 &&F115�6����� WiwaW s Arx0 49c6e S
Qi� A/�S �a rxl s r�� �2A/'�,� I lv,L�.•v,D AS,
7_AMOUNT Of ND AFFECTED:
Initially w acres Ultimately acres
S.WIL,VPROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS?
Yes ❑ No If no,describe briefly:
9.WH IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.)
[21kesidential ❑industrial ❑Commercial DAgriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open Space ❑Other (describe)
10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL
AGEN (Federal, State or Local)
es ❑No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval:
lc�z'UN
11.DOES ANY Ayy PECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL?
❑Yes I o if yes, list agency name and permit / approval:
12. AS A R OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION?
❑Yes No
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
Applicant / Spons /Date:
6 Signature Lz—
zA
If the action is a Costal Area,and you are a state agency,
complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment
PART 11- IMPACT ASSESSMENT(To be completed by Lead Agency)
A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617A? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF.
0 Yes a No .
B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.67 If No,a negative
declaration may be superseded by another involved agency.
El Yes ' In/ No
C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible)
C1. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal,
potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly:
No /C2.Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly:
No
C3.Vegetation fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly:
or I
No
C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or;change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly:
No
C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly:
No
C6. Long term,short tern,cumulative,or other effects not identified in CI-05? Explain briefly:
No
C7. Other impacs,(induding changes In use.of either quantity or type of energy? Explain briefly:
No
D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL AREA(CEA)? If es,ex lain briefly:
Yes n No
i
E. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If yes a lain:
I
❑Yes a No
PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency)
INSTRUCTIONS; For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it Is substantial,large,important.orothervvise significant Each
effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural);(b)probability of occurring;(c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e)
geographic scope;and(f)magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain
suffident detail.to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. if question d of part ii was checked
yes,the determination of significance mustevaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA.
Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur.Then proceed directly to the FUL
EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.
Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,that the proposed actin
WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental Impacts AND provide,on attachments as necessary,the reasons supporting thi
determination.
Board of Trustees
Name of Lead Agency Date
Jill M. Doherty President
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer
C
C
Signature of Re9ponsible Officer i ead.Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer)
B6ard of Trustees Application
County of Suffolk
State of New York
�G 9dLj---C,'P1, Vw BEING DULY SWORN
DEPOSES AND RMS THAT /S RIMS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE
TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK
WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY
BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT
AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES
HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING
UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S),IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS
APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES,THEIR AGENTS) OR
REPRESENTATIVES(S),TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE
PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION.
111jignature
SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS / DAY OF U/ ,20 M
Notary Public
JOANNE M.DOUGHERTY
Notary Public, State of New YOfk
No.01 DO6204526
Oualified in Suffolk County
Commission Expires April 20,2013
E ��-d of Trustees Appli_catioi-
f
AUTHORIZATION .
(where the applicant is not the owner)
I, ce, t Q, _ C', �o residing .at 4F.? ie c 1c PJ. A��14 Vh S�. Nylry
. (print owner of property) (mailing address)
do hereby authorize e-t- o,.,, • -
(Agent)
to apply for permit(s) from the
Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf.
(Owner's signature)
8
Town of Southold
LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM
A. INSTRUCTIONS
1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for
proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This
assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in
making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits
and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area.
2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt
minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local
Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant
beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town).
3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes",then the proposed action may affect the
achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law.
Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a
determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy
standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy
standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken.
A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's
website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all
local libraries and the Town Clerk's office.
B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION
SCTM# ?I
The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response):
Town Board 0 Planning Dept. 11 Building Dept. 1�r Board of Trustees
1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response):
(a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital 0
construction,planning activity,agency regulation, land transaction)
(b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan,subsidy)
(c) Permit,approval,license,certification:
Nature and extent of action:
Location of action: GQ1TA6,r-- *4 1awF-- &- —rzv,-JS �
Site acreage: &2,?'5-7 �
Present land use:
Present zoning classification:
2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following
information shall be provided:
(a) Name of applicant: lVJ^--'UAT- cum
(b) Mailing address: !q3/ O)Z gaga
(c) Telephone number:Area Code(
(d) Application number, if any:
Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency?
Yes ❑ No[" If yes,which state or federal agency?
DEVELOPED COAST POLICY
Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character,
preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and
minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation
criteria.
ZYes No ❑ Not Applicable je►5�,.> ,
jL
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See
LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria
IXO—Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable
,&&r,- AAw 7'a,415 w gc 14--0
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See
LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria
10"Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable
,4 Z: &A)
Attach additional sheets if necessary
NATURAL COAST POLICIES
Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP
Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria
Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable
12s _ 4w"-
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III
—Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria
Yes 1A No 0 Not Applicable
/i/�—l��t'�` r:f ///1'-fi lJf7a Il / a��� �yLCaJ'j��/� I!Yl� G� c�✓� /i✓Q'I"���
v A SU, GV.
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including
Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22
through 32 for evaluation criteria.
9yes [:d No E Not Applicable
r 1U iS - lu-0
b4atie . 9Ar3f7�Aut' wa 4 S
� I
1
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies
Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria.
❑ Yes [] No�ot Applicable
Pay_ [,�J�L �%� /�A✓r,- /1v
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous
substances and wastes. See LWMP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria.
�
❑ Yes ❑ No U Not Applicable n
lycM�VIE I M 6"A-r-7-5 e•J 7*� PA;LILR an,f'l�._i,,T
PUBLIC COAST POLICIES
1
Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public
resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation
criteria.❑ YesO No 2rNot Applicable
PA9 S_6G'T 10/LL N6/' .9 ilC— A N t/ G.nJ Pv 9GIG /qCCf.SS w> Le lG
Attach additional sheets if necessary
WORKING COAST POLICIES
Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in
suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria.
❑ Yes ❑ No VNot Applicable
Lam/1-L /ZZ5y— yr-- An2 Gv4� a�l� 1��
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic
Estuary and Town waters.
wasters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria.
Yes Elu No Not Applicable
�vS i/`f�<.�.� ,c ,ter 66AV&f e ��M Ae—F-d n-) L IVIA16
1-2 Qveeas'
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages
62 through 65 for evaluation criteria.
❑Yes ❑ No[2 Not Applicable
v v
l rv.�S
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP
Section III—Policies;
/Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria.
[IYes ❑ No 2 Not Applicable
!1 r�Gr1)z2c��� `&t—c- V07— A.,)
Created on 512510511:20 AM
Principi Builders, Inc.
PO. Box 1248
,qni rthnlrl Nv 1 1 Q71
June 17, 2010
Dear Board of Trustees Southold Town:
Thic letter is to rern iect infnrmatinn ahni it what Xnlni tlri be necPccary to
demolish and reclaim the building envelope at cottage 4- Blue Horizons Bluff,
Peconic NY: Suffolk County tax map #1000-74 0135.54.
I would like to request an amendment of the already approved wetlands permit
in order to move the building envelope out of the Trustees jurisdiction. Please
let me know how I should proceed at vour earliest possible convenience.
Thank you,
Richard J. Principi, Jr. �; 5
516-852-0651
For: Vincent Curto and Rose Curto
p,� ei Trust�;es
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
1. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE USEPA GENERAL PERMIT AND THE NYSDEC,DURING THE
COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION,CERTAIN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MAY BECOME GOLDSMITH'S INLET
O / NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO OFF-SITE AREAS,PONDS,WATER COURSES,
0` DRAINAGE INLETS,RECHARGE BASINS,ETC. ACTUAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE DICTATED
O � Wp / BY FIELD CONDITIONS AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES,BUT THE FOLLOWING GENERAL CONDITIONS LONG ISLAND SOUND
SHALL BE OBSERVED:
EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED AND REMAIN UNDISTURBED.
CLEARING AND GRADING SHALL BE SCHEDULED SO AS TO MINIMIZE THE SIZE OF EXPOSED AREAS
AND THE LENGTH OF TIME THAT AREAS ARE EXPOSED. SALT MARSH Lk
THE LENGTH AND STEEPNESS OF CLEARED SLOPES SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO REDUCE RUNOFF
A`G VELOCITIES. A`v / / SEDIMENT SHALL BE RETAINED ON THE SITE. PROJECT LOCATION
V / / SPECIFIC METHODS AND MATERIALS EMPLOYED IN THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES SHALL CONFORM TO THE"NEW YORK GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL". 2
i
2. SEDIMENT BARRIERS(SILT FENCE,HAY BALES OR APPROVED EQUAL)SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED 0
ALONG THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FOR THE DURATION OF THE WORK. NO SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE
SHALL BE PERMITTED TO WASH ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES,WETLANDS OR ROADS.
3. GRADED AND STRIPPED AREAS AND STOCKPILES SHALL BE KEPT STABILIZED THROUGH THE USE OF
TEMPORARY SEEDING AS REQUIRED. SEED MIXTURES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOIL
CONSERVATION SERVICE RECOMMENDATIONS.
/ 4. DRAINAGE INLETS INSTALLED AS PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT BUILDUP
THROUGH THE USE OF SEDIMENT BARRIERS,SEDIMENT TRAPS,ETC.AS REQUIRED.
5. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IS TO BE PERFORMED DAILY BY THE
CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE DAY AND AFTER HEAVY OR PROLONGED ^�
STORMS. MAINTENANCE MEASURES INCLUDE,BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO,CLEANING AND/OR REPAIR OF �v P
SEDIMENT BASINS OR TRAPS,SEDIMENT BARRIERS,BERMS,DIVERSIONS AND INLET PROTECTION. QS
/ �// \\ \\\ I� 6. APPROPRIATE MEANS SHALL BE USED TO CONTROL DUST DURING CONSTRUCTION.
7. A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO PREVENT SOIL AND LOOSE DEBRIS 9�
EX.WOOD PLATFORM AND / %� / \ \\ \ �t /^ / \ FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO LOCAL ROADS. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL �0
STAIRS TO REMAIN / �/ / \ \� ✓ \ THE SITE IS PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 9O
AND O� 8. SEDIMENT BARRIERS AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL UPLAND
/ S /��R\S / / DISTURBED AREAS ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. AFTER PERMANENT STABILIZATION,PAVED AREAS
HAYBAYBALES / O OOEPO / SHALL BE CLEANED AND THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM CLEANED AND FLUSHED AS NECESSARY.
�c?, < EX.WELL
EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN
REPLACE EXISTING ROOF SHINGLES,SIDING, ��� 0�`� -�� / 0 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS:
WINDOWS AND DOORS �\
� THE PROPOSED ON-SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO PROVIDE STORAGE FORA 2"
RAINFALL. STORAGE TO BE PROVIDED IN PROPOSED 10'DIAMETER DRYWELLS
PROVIDING 68.42 CF PER VERTICAL FOOT OF STORAGE. THE DESIGN IS BASED
ON THE FOLLOWING RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS:ROOF 1.0,CONCRETE 1.0, AND
PROVIDE NEW GUTTERS AND LEADERS AND ` \ / / / LANDSCAPING 0.30.
CONNECT TO NEW DRYWELL WITH 8"0 ADS PIPE \ DRAINAGE AREA
STORAGE REQUIRED:
�qo
00 De ROOF AREA: 574 SF X 1.00 X 2"112--96 CF
� R EX.WOOD DECK AND aal STORAGE REQUIRED: pVN� OPO Pp
STAIRS TO BE REMAIN NEW 10'0 X 2'DEEP DRYWELL 96 CF 168.42 CFNF=1.4 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED ERoPO
\` �,```\ 0� � M�pp1.
EXISTING STOCKADE FENCE AND FOR ROOF RUNOFF / l STORAGE PROVIDED: NG\S
ENCLOSED SHOWER TO REMAIN \ '-,``\\` / l USE 1-10'0 X 2'DEEP DRYWELL \-O
/ GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL MATERIALS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND
\ SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE SOUTHOLD TRUSTEES AS REQUIRED.
/ \ 2. TOPOGRAPHIC AND EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS FROM SURVEY DATED MARCH 22,2010 BY
4 HANDS ON SURVEYING.
3. COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE AS DEPICTED ONI THE COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA MAP TOWN OF
SOUTHOLD,SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK PHOTO)NO.57-556-83 SHEET 6 OF 49.
\ 4. LOT AREA 62,252 SQ.FT.=1.429 ACRES
\\ 5. CURRENT ZONING RR&R-40 RR:31,587 SQ.FT.R40 30,665 SQ.FT.
6. S.C.T.M.DIST.1000 SEC.74 BLK.01 LOT 35.54
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCAITION AND DEPTH OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE
�DI COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED ALL SUBSURFACE INFORMATION SHOWN ON
4/ THESE PLANS IS CONCEPTUAL AND MUST BE CONFORMED ACCORDINGLY IN THE FIELD.
\ 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS BEFORE
COMMENCING WORK.
9. ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AND DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN,COUNTY,
STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS,CODES AND ORDINANCES.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
/ I DISPOSING OF ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIALS OFFSITE. DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE BURIED ON-SITE.
10. DURING CONSTRUCTION,EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TO BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY TO
sPREVENT THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO OFF-SITE AREAS,PONDS,DRAINAGE INLETS,ETC. THE
LEACHINQG BASIN NOTES: \�\ / �"� METHODS AND MATERIALS EMPLOYED IN THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES SHALL CONFORM TO"THE NEW YORK GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL".
1. LEACHIING POOLS SHALL BE PRECAST CONCRETE CEMENT STRUCTURES AS
MANUFAGCTURED BY SUFFOLK PRECAST INC.OR EQUIVALENT. _ 'EyF \ 11. ALL PRECAST STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH SUFFICIENT STEEL REINFORCEMENT TO
Eq�Iy, \ WITHSTAND AASHTO H-20 TRAFFIC LOADING ALONG WITH TEMPERATURE AND SHRINKAGE,TRANSPORT TO
2. ALL CCONCRETE CEMENT USED IN THE MANUFACTURING OF PRECAST STRUCTURES SHALL -�RAff THE SITE AND SITE CONDITIONS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
POSTS-STEEL,T OR U SHAPE TYPE
DEVELOFPA MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4,000 P.S.I.IN 28 DAYS.OR 2"HARDWOOD 12. ALL PRECAST STRUCTURES SHALL BE MANUFACTURED WITH 4,000 PSI CONCRETE AND SHALL BE DESIGNED,
-,_
3. NO TRRENCH,PIT OR OTHER EXCAVATION SHALL BE LEFT OPEN OR UNATTENDED. / / CONSTRUCTED AND INSTALLED TO SUPPORT AASHTO H-20 TRAFFIC LOADING.
FENCE-WOVEN WIRE 14.5 GAUGE EXCAVATIONS TO BE PROTECTED WITH FENCES,BARRICADES AND OTHER APPROVED
6"MAX.MESH OPENING METHODDS. / 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL PRECAST STRUCTURES DETAILING THE STEEL
FILTER CLOTH-MIRAFI 140N \� REINFORCEMENT AND PROVIDE CERTIFICATION BY THE PRECAST MANUFACTURER THAT STRUCTURES ARE
OR APPROVED EQUAL 5. INVERRT ELEVATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD TO MEET FIELD _/ ® / DESIGNED TO SUPPORT H-20 TRAFFIC LOADING.
CONDITICONS TO AVOID CONFLICT WITH UTILITIES AS ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER.
14. MANUFACTURER TO CERTIFY THAT DRAINAGE AND SANITARY PRECAST STRUCTURES DELIVERED TO THE
0 6. ALLOW FOUR(4)INCHES FOR FINAL ADJUSTING OF CASTING. ADEQUATE BEARING WILL BE SITE MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
Q, PROVIDED USING CONCRETE BLOCK,BRICK AND/OR 1:2 MORTAR MIX. / Q HEALTH SERVICES.
36'MIN.FENCE POST p z z 7. THE CIANTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHEETING AND SHORING DURING o ® f d 7 c W D 5"
0 HAYBALES _ TRENCHING TO INSURE THE SAFETY OF WORKMEN AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXPOSED TO
J N ' DRA/NAGE/NLET(TW) THE HAZARDS OF FALLING AND SLIDING MATERIAL IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE E ® OF 'f !J im J
U_ REQUIREMENTS OF THE TITLE 29 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS,PART 1926,SAFETY AND
UNDISTURBED GROUND HEALTH FREGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION(OSHA). _ t'N OF SOUTHOLD
^� Fes--LOWif FLOW FLOW IO�t'v �?'�/
SILT FENCE NOTES: 8. BACKITILL AND COMPACTION SHALL BE IN 6'LIFTS. ALL BACKFILL MATERIAL TO BE
COMPACTED BACKFILL BOUND STRAW BALES COMPACITED BY JETTING OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS. DATE
1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE(MIN.141/2 GAUGE MAX.6'MESH SPACING) "X6'TRENCH
WITH FILTER CLOTH OVER FENCE. _ _ SUFFOLK COUNTY STANDARD DRAIN MANH ME AND
EMBED FILTER z 2X2 WOOD , SLOTTED COVER PATTERN No.1383 AS MANUFACT BY
2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE 2 STAKES(TYP.) CAMBELL FOUNDRY OR AN APPROVED EQUAL.
CLOTH 6"MIN. / _•___1
WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24"AT TOP AND MID SECTION. INTO GROUND (SEE BEDDING
DETAIL) p FLOW S PRECAST t.�_
3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY �i CHIMNEY FINISHED GRADE 7I27/1O TRUSTEE COMMENTS
SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. STRAW BALE INLET PROTECTION DETAIL TWO REBARS,STEEL PICKETS,
\ �\ ,\ 'TRAFFIC BEARING z c / ! REVISIONS
OR 2'x2"STAKES DRIVEN , V �/
4. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL NOTES: �/� 4"VERTICAL TOP SLAB
REMOVED WHEN"BULGES"DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. 1.BALES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOE OF A SLOPE OR ON THE CONTOUR 2'INTO GROUND.FIRST ` FACE 24"
SECTION AND IN A ROW WITH ENDS TIGHTLY ABUTTING THE ADJACENT BALES. STAKE DRIVEN AT ANGLE BEDDING DETAIL
f N
WOVEN WIRE FENCE(MIN.141/2
TOWARDS PREVIOUSLY LAID t
GAUGE MAX.6"MESH SPACING) 2.EACH BALE SHALL BE EMBEDDED IN THE SOIL A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES STRAW BALE.DRIVE STAKES _ - w O
POSTS(TYP.) 36"MIN.FENCE POSTS. AND PLACED SO THE BINDINGS ARE HORIZONTAL. FLUSH WITH TOP OF BALE
10'MAX CENTER TO CENTER DRIVEN 16"MIN.INTO THE (� �O Oy
GROUND 3.BALES SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED IN PLACE BY EITHER TWO STAKES ' - 9"COLLAR z
It I
OR RE-BARS DRIVEN THROUGH THE BALE. THE FIRST STAKE IN EACH "�" �' z.• a f
ANGLE FIRST STAKE TOWARD WRAP WITH 6 OZ.(MIN.)NONWOVEN '
r,, BALE SHALL BE DRIVEN TOWARD THE PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE AT AN ANGLE PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE ` GEOTEXTILE(FILTER FABRIC)MIRAFI ''r w
LL z TO FORCE THE BALES TOGETHER STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH t t '� � 140N OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. PRECAST DRAINAGE
WITH THE BALE. :; RINGS
o t �� SHEET PILING AS REQUIRED
F- io Flow Plans are prepared by Condon Engineering,P.C.It is a violation of the New York State Education Law, QF yP
ILT EN E'. . 4.INSPECTION SHALL BE FREQUENT AND REPAIR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE '"{ ESSI
' Article 145,Section 7209,for any person ualess acting under the direction of a fioerraed Professional
w MADE PROMPTLY AS NEEDED. _ y 5 tw �� ' EXCAVATE AND BACKFILL 3 FEET AROUND . i Engineer,Architect,or Land Surveyor,liealter any item in any way.If an item hearing the seal of an
Engineer,Architect,or Lard Surveyor is altered,the altering Engineer,Architect,or Land Surveyor shall
LEACHING RINGS WITH SUITABLE POROUS "''�'� affix to the i6em h sorer seal and the notation'Altered followed Wier s nature and the date of
5.BALES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFULNESS MATERIAL AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. .:+''�• t1J 9
'• •.• ,•, ,••, O H such aherations,and a specific description of the allratm.
SO AS NOT TO BLOCK OR IMPEDE STORM FLOW OR DRAINAGE. r;
6"PENETRATION INTO
GROUND ;.} .: ::•*t :j`ti`.: Jr`': f•,K, �`• N 0
+''� • '° • r ' :;f' "0 CURTO IMPROVEMENTS
(SEE SECTION) ELEVAITION ANCHORING DETAIL _ '.. - Y •., Yr • A f " Scale: 1"=30'-0"
EXCAVATE A MINIMUM OFVINTCO VIRGIN STRATA Condon Engineering, P.C. country Route 48 smiOF SAND AND GRAVEL OR TO BOTTOM OF DRYWELL 1755 Si sbee Road PeConic, New York
SILT FENCE: DETAIL STRAW BALE DIKE DETAIL WHICHLEVERISDEEPER. DRYWELL DETAIL Drawn by:JJC Ma1755 igsbeeNew York11952 OF
NOT TO SC/ALE NTS (631)298-1986 (631)298-2651 Fax
Date: 6/25/2010 www.condonengineedng.com SITE PLAN 2
SCOPE OF WORK:
1. EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN UNHEATED
2. REPLACE EXISTING ROOF SHINGLES,SIDING,WINDOWS AND DOORS
3. INSTALL NEW ROOF DRYWELL,GUTTERS,LEADERS AND ASSOCIATED PIPING.
REPLACE EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS(TYP.)
REPLACE EXISTING ROOF SHINGLES
REPLACE EXISTING ROOF SHINGLES
REPLACE EXISTING SIDING
REPLACE EXISTING SIDING SOUTH SIDE
REPLACE EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS(TYP.) REPLACE EXISTING WINDOW(TYP.)
0 CLOSET SINK
20X20
KITCHEN it
BEDROOM
O �
� O
NORTH ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION � B HR
CL CL •
P---j �==�
REPLACE EXISTING DOOR(TYP.)
REPLACE EXISTING ROOF SHINGLES REPLACE EXISTING ROOF SHINGLES EAST SIDE
WEST SIDE
LIVINGROOM
10'-0"
40,
REPLACE EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS(TYP.) — REPLACE EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS(TYP.) pq
0
REPLACE EXISTING SIDING REPLACE EXISTING SIDING
NORTH SIDE
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
WEST ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
7/27/10 TRUSTEE COMMENTS
REVISIONS
of N etk
J.Co p
°2
Plans are prepared by Condon Engineering,P.C. It is a violation of the New York State
Education Law,Article 145,Section 7209,for any person unless acting under the
direction of a licensed Professional Engineer,Architect,or Land Surveyor,to alter any P�O fCc c+��A�
item in any way.If an item bearing the seal of an Engineer,Architect,or Land Surveyor EJ.7
is altered,the altering Engineer,Architect,or Land Surveyor shall affix to the item
histher seal and the notation'Altered by*followed by hisftw signabire and the date of
such alterations,and a specific description of the alteration.
CLIMATIC AND GEOGRAPHIC DESIGN CRITERIA CURTO IMPROVEMENTS
Scale: 1/4"= 11-011 Condon Engineering, P.C. Country Route 48
Ground Snow Load Wind Speed Seismic Weathering Frost Line Termite Decay Winter Design Ice Shield Flood Hazards Sm2
Depth Temp. Undedayment Drawn by:JJC 1755 Sigsbee Road Peconic, New York OF
Re uired Mattituck,New York 11952
25 psf 120 mph B Severe 36 in. Moderate Slight to 11°F Yes (631)298-1986 (631)298-2651 Fax EXISTING
to Heavy I Moderate Date: 6/25/2010 www.condonengineering.com
--CONDITIONS-PLAN 2