HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-09/14/1981 J ,
P _1 D
T cr3 L D
S Ol � � Y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr., Chairman TELEPHONE
2UPXQMz9R=x 765-1938
JAMES WALL
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr.
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr.
William F. Mullen, Jr.
A regular meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board was held
at 7 :30 p.m. , Monday September 14 1981, at the Town Hall, Main Road
Southold, New York. Present were:
Chairman Henry E. Raynor, Jr.
Member G. Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Member William F. Mullen, Jr.
Member Bennett Orlowski, Jr. (arrived late)
7 :30 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of the approval of the minor
subdivision of George and Jane Toumanoff, located at Mattituck. John
Wickham was present to voice his approval of this subdivision.
Onmotion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED to dispense with the reading of the metes and bounds des-
cription on the minor subdivision entitled George and Jane Toumanoff.
Vote of the .board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen
Mr. Raynor: Is there any objection from anybody in the audience here
tonight concerning the deletion of the minutes the reading of the
metes and bounds description? Hearing none motion carried.
It should be noted that the description was in the Suffolk Weekly
Times, commencing on the 3 of September, signed by Troy Gustayson,
and noterized by Helen K. Devoe.' Going through the file, we have
receipt of the Town Clerk of filing fee in 'the amount of $100 .00, copy
of the legal notice as it 'appeared, correspondence from this board
setting this evening as a hearing for this proposed subdivision,
correspondence from the applicant, correspondence from the Suffolk
County Department of Planning;
The Planning Commission at its regular meeting on August 5, re-
viewed the proposed subdivision entitled, Minor Subdivision, George
and Jane Toumanoff, referred to it pursuant to Section 1333 of the
Suffolk County Charter. After due study and deliberation it resolved
to approve said map subject to the following six conditions:
1 . Approval of this subdivision shall be made subject to the
meeting the requirements and standards of the Suffolk County Depart-
ment of Health Services .
(2) 9/14/81
2 . The alignment of the proposed road shall be improved by the
use of horizontal curves .
3 . The map for the subdivision of the remainder of the property
( labeled Section No. 2 on the present map) shall be filed as a major
subdivision in the office of the County Clerk.
4. The proposed intersection of Mill Road and the proposed
street shall be constructed in such a manner as to insure adequate
sight distance for vehicles entering Mill Road.
5 . No lot shall be changed in any manner unless authorized by
the Town of Southold Planning Board.
6 . Conditions three and five shall be filed as covenants and
restrictions in the Suffolk County Clerk' s Office.
signed by Charles G. LiiT6, duplicate files, notice of transmittal
to the Suffolk County Planning Commission, waiver of requirements
as this is a minor subdivision, for drainage structures, and corres-
pondence from Department of Health Services;
We are in receipt of your letter concerning the above. It
should be noted that this area has a history of limited groundwater
supply date to nitrate contamination and salt water intrusion.
Should you have any further question, please feel free to contact me.
Royal R. Reynolds, PE, Public Health Engineer, General Engineering
Services, more correspondence and transmittals ;- Suffolk County
Department of Planning, copy of the short environmental assessment
form under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, approval by
this board of the sketch plan on May 8, metes and bound description,
applicant' s application and a copy again of the surveyors courses
and distances . As has been the procedure of this board, we will ask
if there is anyone present this evening va,who would like to speak in
opposition to this proposed minor subdivision of George and Jane
Toumanoff? Hearing none, is there anyone present this evening who
would like to speak in favor of this .proposed minor subdivision?
John Wickham: My name is John Wickham, holder of the contract, for
a part interest. As I go before the planning board, I would like to
speak in favor of it. To the best of my knowledge and belief, we have
met all the requirements . one we have not had the map changed provid-
ing horizontal curves because, it was the opinion of our engineer
that, the curves are so shallow and that the road would naturally
follow the curve in all reasonable . senses . However, we expect to meet
all the requirements of the planning board.. If the planning board
feels that horizontal curves should be made, it is a note that they
are less than 30 curves of 30 angles ; As I said, our engineer feels
it is somewhat unnecessary. I also want to say, we have a copy of the
permit granted to George for the subdivision.
t
(3) 9/14/81
Mr. Raynor: Thank you John. Is there anyone else present this
evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor sub-
division? Hearing none, is there anyone present who has some infor-
mation and should come before the board at this time, concerning this
subdivision, which may be neither pro nor con, but should become part
of this hearing? Hearing none, Mr. Mullen, questions? Mr. Latham?
(Negative)
There being no further questions from this board, we will consider
this hearing closed. Thank you very much for coming down.
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the request for a name change on the Smith, Carter,
Blanchard subdivision from Richard A. and Dorthea E. Howard to
Richard A. and Martha Howard to be tabled until next meeting, as the
Fishers Island board member was not present.
Vote of the board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen
Highland Estates After the committee inspected the property on Aug-
ust 27; and September 2 , it was noted that 18 curb cuts have to be
repaired. Six of the thirteen dwellings are occupied. Construction
equipment had been on the premises during the time of inspection.
There is approximately 1500 feet of curbing, leading to the main road,
that needs clearing. The committee has given six reports on this
property since April 30, 1981.' The board does not find this property
suitable for a CO.-
7 : 45 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of the approval of the
minor subdivision entitled Robert Johnson, located in Southold.
On motion made by �Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, . it was
RESOLVED to dispense with the reading of the metes and bounds des-
cription on the property of the minor subdivision entitled Robert
Johnson.
Vote of the board: Ayes : Raynor, Latham, Mullen
Mr. Raynor: It should be noted the legal notice ran in the Suffolk
Weekly Times one week, commencing on the third day of September, 1981,
signed by Troy Gustayson, noterized by Helen K. Devoe . In review
of the file we have transmittals; copies of maps to the Suffolk
County Planning Commission, transmittals and copies of correspondence
to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, per-
taining to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, copy of the
legal notice, course and distances from the surveyor and a copy of
the determination of this board to declare lead agency under the State
Environmental Quality Review Act, an-.,initial determination of non-
significance , also setting a resolution for Public Hearing for this
piece of property at this time, .,-correspondence back from the Department
s
(4) 9/14/81
Mr. Raynor con't. of Planning stating that this is not within
their jusisdiction, signed by Charles Lind, copy of subdivision and
road profiles, dated August 4 , resolution from this board approving
a sketch plan on the minor subdivision of Robert Jo4nson, on the, map
dated July 8, a short environmental assessment form, copy of the
applicant' s application along with a receipt from the Town Clerk for
the proper filing fee of $75- 00. The only thing that is missing
from this file, at this time, is a signature on the form for the
fact that there be no new drainage structures other than indicated
for residential building or grading other than for foundation excava-
tion on residential lots . As is the policy of this board, we will
ask if there is anyone present this evening, who .would like to speak
in opposition to this minor subdivision?
Mrs . Wiepzynski: Yes I would.
Mr. Raynor: Would you give your name to the secretary please?
Mrs . Wiepzynski: Mr. and Mrs . Wiepzynski. We are the adjoining
property owners, of , I thought it was Mr. Haans that owned the
property, and I understand now that it is Mr. . Johnson.
Mr. Raynor: That is correct.
Mrs. Wiepzynski: Then the property has been sold?
Mr. Raynor: To the best of my knowledge, Yes .
Mrs ., Wiepzynski: . Well that is what I wanted to know. Has it been
sold or not? Is it still . . .
Mr. Raynor: Yes these people are here representing that they are
in fact, owners of Feetoc.
Mrs . Wiepzynski: In reading the notice in the newspaper, it was
very difficult to follow what' s happening to that piece of property.
Mr. Raynor: Would you like a copy of one of the maps here, or did
-you have a chance. to come into the office and review it?
Mrs. Wiepzynski: I reviewed it briefly in the office.
Mr. Raynor: ,,. O.K. fine.
Mrs. Wiepzynski: It seems to me that this is one piece of property
and I don't know whether it was sold as one or not, but according to
this legal notice, it looks like there are two hearings today.
Mr. Raynor: That is correct.
Mrs. Wiepzynski: One party and another party. Now, was this property
resold again and divided in half? I don' t understand it.
(5) 91 j.4/81
Mr. Raynor: It is my understanding to change a title, from Mr. Haan,
half of which went to Mr. Johnson and half of which went to Mr. Penny.
Mrs . Wiepznski: So there were two separate sales of property then?
Mr. Raynor: That is correct, on which we heard a subdivision approx-
imately six months ago.
Mrs . Wiepznski: My concern is that most of the property in that
area are larger parcels and if this type of a subdivision is sold and
then split down the middle and then further subdivide, I just don' t
approve of it. I don' t think it is keepin in character with the area.
I don' t approve of the way the sale was, if it was a. sale. I think
if it was one piece of property that was six acres, I just don' t
know. Having a road in there the way it is . I don' t know how its
water situation would be and sewers on six lots on that size of
property. . . piece of property I border on. I am concerned about
it. If you look at all the properties on Sound View Avenue there,
it is not in keepin with the character.
Mr. Raynor: The only thing I can say is . . .
Mrs . Wiepznski: I feel that the lots are very very minimum and I
don' t approve of that and I would like the board to sort of consider
that.
Mr. Raynor: O.K. Do you have anything else you would like to add,
concerning it?
Mrs . Wiepznski: Were both pieces of property sold at one time?
Mr. Raynor: I haven' t the foggiest idea.
Mrs . Wiepznski: Is there any way we could find out?
Mr. Raynor:: If you wanted to go to the Suffolk County Department,
County Clerk' s office, you could find out.
Mrs. Wiepznski: It seems that if someone had six acres and was will-
ing to sell it, that the division would have to be done differently,
than it was done right here.
Mr. Raynor: O.K. Is there anyone else this evening who would like
to speak in opposition to this minor subdivision of 'Robert Johnson?
Hearing none, Is there anyone present this evening who would -like to
speak in favor of this proposed minor subdivision of Robert Johnson?
Mr. Johnson: I would.
Mr. Raynor: Would you give your name to the secretary?
Mr. Johnson: Robert Johnson. All lots are three acres plus, the
lots to the west of us, I think are owned by Edson. They are one
acre plus . I don' t think it ehanges the area at all . As far as be-
ing small lots , there are a few parcels that are very large lots, be-
hind us , or to the east of us, are an acre of better. Sewerage
., (6) 9/14/!
Mr. Johnson: con' t. . . wouldn' t be any problem within the scope of
what the Board of :-Health describes , I think that they are several
good looking home sites.
Mrs . Wiepznski: .Looking at the property that lies to the east of yours
and I guess, Mr. Penny' s there are lots in there which the water just
lays all summer and that' s my concern. Can you put a home on a lot
like that?
Mr. Raynor: The only thing the board can deal with tonight is what' s
within the metes and bounds description of the area you describe.
Mrs. Wiepznski: I really feel that, you know, that the character of
the whole area that this is_:j.ust not condusive in keeping with Southold
Town and we are very interested in that.
Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone else this evening who would like to add
to this?
Mr. Penny: Yes I would like to add to this . George Penny. If you
look at the area, we split a single piece, that was a three acre
parcel, right across the street, into three, which meant all of the
departments of Southold Town, which went very smoothly, and they
wanted the three lots and everything was done accordingly, above board.
It is a hillside lot_ . There are similar hillside lots, they have no
low. lying areas, as they have in the parcels that you -are concerned
with. They meet all.. the requirements of Southold Town. They are
nicely wooded. They are larger than the property to the west of us .
If you go past Indian woods, you go into Hickory and into that sub-
division, where you have half acre lots . So I would say that this is
very--much in keeping with the entire area.. If you could look up and
down Soundview Avenue, you would find several strips that are larger
but these are eventually all going to be broken down. If you go, if
you took that one little section of Soundview Avenue, true there,. are
some bigger parcels, but if you go further to the west and further
to the east, in any., you know, distance, .you're. going to find that
everything in there is going to acres, and I feel this is very con-
sistant with keeping with the area growth and a healthy growth for the
Town.
Mrs . Wiepznski: I disagree . . .with that. . .
Mr. Raynor: Wait a minute, I 've got to give everybody who wants to
speak in favor of this an opportunityvto speak.
Mrs . Wiepznski: Alright.
Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone else present this evening who would like
to speak in favor of this proposed subdivision? Hearing none, Is
there anyone present this evening that may be neither pro nor con,
that has some information that should come before this board?
• (7) ! 4/81
Mrs. Wiepznski: Mr. Penny here mentioned the fact that this was
with keeping with the character of the area. Westland, when it was
developed, for fact many many years, and if you look at the Jennings
Estate today, that is three acre parcels over there. That is more
in keeping with the character of Southold.
Mr. Raynor: We have had one subdivision already on the Jennings
Estate.
Mrs. Wiepznski: Yes, that' s right, but the wooded lots are three
acre lots.
Mr. Raynor: Alright, is there anyone else this evening who would
like to have some imput to this public hearing? Hearing none, Mr.
Latham, any questions? Mr. Mullen?
(Negative)
Mr. Raynor: The only comment I would .have is number one, before any
homes were to be constructed, the Department of Health Services would
be called in to check both the cess pools and wells, as far as . the
fresh water aspect of development of this property would be concerned,
z-o that is one of the safe guards that is built in with developments,
whether it be here or anywhere else within the county. Alright,
there being no further question, I will deem this hearing closed, and
thank you for coming down.
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the request for a property split on the property of
Robert J. and Nancy R. Douglass, Willow Terrace II, located in Orient
be processed as a set-of, for one lot provision 10.6-13a.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen
8: 00 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of the minor subdivision of
George L. Penny IV, located in Southold, New York.
On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED to dispense with the reading of the metes and bounds des-
cription on the property of George L. Penny IV, located in Southold.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen
Mr. Raynor: Publication containing the legal notice. which ran for
one week in the Suffolk Weekly Times , commencing on the third day of
September, 1981. signed by Troy Gustayson, notarized by Helen K. DeVoe.
In review of the file, we are in receipt of the filing fee from the
Town Clerk's office for the amount of $75 . 00, for three lots , file
from the Suffolk County Department of Planning:
Please be advised that pursuant to Section 1.333, Article XIII
of the Suffolk County Charter that the above captioned plat is not
within the jurisdiction of the Suffolk County Planning Commission.
(8) 9, /81
Mr. Raynor con' t - correspondence from this board granting sketch
plan approval on the eiYith day of July, short environmental assess-
ment form, signed by the applicant, application for approval of plot,
correspondence from this board, Suffolk County Planning Commission
transmittals, correspondence from this board to New York State Depart-
ment of Environmental Control, declaring this agency as Lead Agency
and making determination of non-significance, legal notice, metes and
bounds description, surveyor, copy to the applicant resolving the
Planning Board declare itself lead agency under State Environmental
Quality Review Act, copies of maps and correspondence. Again, in
this file we are missing the drainage structures waiver, along with
the statement on no grading other than residential buildings on the
lot. . As is the policy of this board, I will ask if there is anyone
present this evening who would like to speak in opposition to this
proposed minor subdivision for George L. Penny IV?
Mrs . Wiepznski: Again, as I said; this is not keeping with the
character of the area, and being thata.i:t was a large parcel, and it
was sold as two parcels, I don' t know whether as being an adjoining
neighbor, I should have been notified, which I was not. I thought
that when there was any kind of a subdivision, that people whose
property touched on that, would be notified. I never did, other than
the notice.
Mr. Raynor: No that is not correct. Only when there' s a variance
from the zoning or subdivision regulations, is proof of publication
usually suffices in these areas .
Mrs . Wiepznski: But again, it is the same feeling that I have, that
it' s not in keeping with the character of Southold.
Mr. Raynor: O.K. Thank you. Is there anyone else present this even-
ing who would like to speak in opposition to this proposed minor sub-
division?
Mrs.. Wiepznski: Just one other thing ,I would like to say, that Mr.
Penny brought up before, was that he made an assumption that all the
property along Sound View Avenue will be subdivided up into small
lots . That, that is going to happen. I don' t think that that' s an
assumption he should make and I don' t think that he should, I don' t
think he .is thinking in the best interest for the Town of Southold.
Mr. Raynor: O.K. Thank you. Is there anyone else present this
evening who would like to speak in opposition to this proposed minor?
Hearing none, is there anyone present this evening who would like to
speak in favor of this proposed minor subdivision of George L Penny IV?
Mr. Penny: Without repeating myself, I would just like to say, that
we have done everything properly . . . the planning regulations
established by the various departments in the Town of Southold. We
have done everything within the Town Law. I am not going to get
into an arguement.
(9) 9, /8i
Mr. Raynor: Alright, is there anyone else present this evening who
would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor? Hearing none,
is there anyone present this evening that has some information that
should come before this board at this time which may be neither pro
nor,:con, concerning the property that the board should be aware of
before making a determination? Hearing none, Mr. Mullen questions?
Mr. Latham?
(Negative)
Being no further questions, then we will deem this hearing closed.
Thank you all for coming down.
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Suffolk County Planning recommendation #3 be
amended to read: "No residential structure shall be located within
50 feet of the shoreline, "on the minor subdivision entitled G. Richie
Latham, Jr.. , located in Orient.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Orlowski
Mr. Latham abstained
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the chairman be authorized to sign the amended map of
the minor subdivision entitled G. Richie Latham, Jr. , located in
Orient, with agreement of the Suffolk ..-County Planning recommendations
and the restrictive covenant.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Orlowski
Mr. Latham abstained
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the chairman be authorized to sign the final maps of
the major subdivision entitled Honeysuckle Hills, located at
Mattituck.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Latham, Orlowski
On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
RESOLVED that the chairman be authorized to sign the final map on
the major subdivision entitled Bayview Farm, located in Orient, subject
to the receipt of the 4% inpsection fee.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Latham, Orlowski
On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the site plan and parking of Czartosieski, located in
Peconic, be referred to the Building Inspector for certification.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Latham, Orlowski
(10) 9)' /81
8: 15 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of the approval of the
minor subdivision entitled Hilary Pridgen, located in Laurel.
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED to dispense with the reading of the metes and bounds des-
cription on the minor subdivision entitled Hilary Pridgen, located
in Laurel.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Latham, Orlowski
Mr. Raynor: In review of the file, proof of publication, publication
ran in the. Suffolk Weekly Times for one week commencing on the third
day of September, signed by Troy Gustayson, noterized by Helen K.
Devoe. In review of the file, I have correspondence from Suffolk
County Department of Health Services:
We are in receipt of your letter of March 9, and are in agree-
ment with your designation as lead agency. The area has a question-
able water supply. Prior to commenting, we would normally require a
test well. Should you have any further questions, 1please feel free
to contact this office. Royal R. Reynolds.
Correspondence from. this board to _New York. State Department of En-
vironmental :Conservation, declaring this board as lead agency; this
project is unlisted and initial determination of non-significance
has been made, copy of the .short environmental assessment form to
this applicant, signed by David S. Horton, correspondence to our in-
spector concerning a report as to the improvements on the right of
ways
#1 . Present access to Lot No.3 consists of a one-way looping
road, driveway ten feet in width that meanders through
Lots No. l and No. 2, the new house on Lot No. 3 . 1
assume it was used for entrance and exit. It consists of
hard-packed original ground. Could see no evidence of
other material in this driveway. However, it appears to
have handling house building equipment. If it is to be
used for any future purpose, I would recommend upgrading.
with the addition of 6" bankrun with 20% gravel.
#2 Proposed 25 feet R.O.W.. along easterly line - This R.O.W.
would require tree removal both large and small, includ-
ing stumps throughout. Topsoil would be removed for a
driveway width of say 15 feet. Also, some grading will
be necessary, the ground is higher than Peconic Bay
Boulevard. After grading, would recommend a 6" course of
bank run containing 20% of gravel. See no drainage
problem along the easterly property line. Proposed R.O.W.
along westerly property line.
#3 The same exisiting conditions as to trees, topsoil, etc. ,
as noted for the easterly R.O.W. are found here. I would
not recommend this R.O.W. due to a low areasin the north-
west corner of Lot No. l . Fill would be required to meet
Peconic Bay Boulevard and create a drainage problem.
(11) 9/14/81
Mr. Raynor con' t. correspondence from the applicant' s engineer,
correspondence from this board, the action taken with regard to our
inspection report on the 27 of April, correspondence set forward
the meeting of tonight, copy of legal notice, copy of correspondence
from our board for sketch plan approval, metes and bounds descrip-
tion, correspondence concerning the .honing Board of Appeals require-
ments that have been met. along with the correspondence and the
applicant' s application, short environmental assessment form, state-
ment:--. as to grading, and no new drainage structures and roadways .
Determination from the Board of Appeals concerning this proposed sub-
division. As is the policy of this board, we will ask if anyone is
present this evening who would like to speak in opposition to this
proposed minor subdivision? Hearing none, is there anyone present
this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor
subdivision? Hearing none, is there anyone present this evening
that has some information that should come before this board, at
this time, pertinent to this subdivision? Hearing none, Mr. Orlowski?
Mr. Latham, Mr. Mullen, any questions?
(Negative)
It should be noted that two items of deficiencies, one, in the fact
to date, we have no receipt of filing fee from the town clerk and
this falls within 500 feet of advocable body of water, therefore,
whatever the determination this board would make, would have to be
subject to the Department Suffolk County Planning considerations and
their recommendations on conditions and being no further input, we
will deem this hearing closed.
Grandview Estates - Mrs . ..McClane, on behalf of: Harold Reese, re-
quested a copy of the bond estimate be forwarded to Mr. Reese when
it is ready.
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board submit the certified
check in the amount of $2,250 . 00, for the completion of road con-
struction on the subdivisioneentitled Harbor Lights, in lieu of the
old bond.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Latham, Orlowski
John Simicich - In reviewing the file of this new proposed minor
subdivision, it was noted that this property had been previously
subdivided in 1975 . It was the concensus of the board that the
attorney representing the applicant, make an appointment with the
board, as withdrawal of the completed subdivision is necessary.
-Stephen Schilowitz - Mr. James Cron, representing Mr. Schilowitz
explained the proposed site plan bordering on both Greenport and
Southold boundaries. The plan would consist of nine units, in two
clusters of four, and one unit for Mr. Shilowitz, in a town house
design. Each unit will have a 45 foot slip for sailboats. Water
(12) 9/14,
Mr. Stephen Shilowitz .con't. and sewerage would be supplied by
Greenport Village. Mr. Cron was informed that the zoning must be
changed from A-Residential to M-Multiple, then go through a site
plan procedure with the board. Mr Thomas Samuels spoke in favor
of this proposed plan, stating the local people would welcome the
idea.
John Vescure (Pearson) minor subdivision -" the board does not view
flag lot favorably. Some type of road way needs to be established.
John and Mary Pearson would be willing to sign whatever need be so
that the 20 acre parcel remain in its entirety with no further sub-
divisions in the future. The board requested restrictive covenants
be sent so that, they may be forwarded to the Town Attroney, and
allow the board ample time to study the proposal, and to condider
the possibility of dedicating the road to the. town.
On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
RESOLVED to amend the Suffolk-I-I-County Planning recommendation #4
(four) to -read: "All residential structures shall be located at
least 50 feet back from the edge of Richmond Creek" and to override
recommendation #6 (six) , pertaining to the minor subdivision entitled
Peconic Bay Gardens, Inc. , located in Peconic.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED .that the chairman be authorized to sign the amended maps
with agreement to the Suffolk County Planning recommendations, on the
minor subdivision entitled Peconic Bay Gardens, Inc. , located in
Peconic.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski
Green Briar Acres - has requested a release of bond. from this
major subdivision.
On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
RESOLVED that a letter calling upon surety, to take care of improve-
ments, be directed to the Town Board, including dated correspondence
on the major subdivision entitled Green Briar Acres, located in Orient.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
RESOLVED. that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself
lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, on
the minor subdivision entitled Phebe Bridge Estate, located in
Southold. An initial determination of non.-significance has been
made.
(13) 9; /81
Phebe Bridge Estate con`-- - applicant must submit new maps with the
conditions set by the ZBA, combining lots number two and three as
one lot. ryIap must show access to lot 'number one.
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the chairman be authorized to sign the final map of
the , subdivision entitled Nicholas Fontana, located in Mattituck, with
complete agreement of the Suffolk County Planning recommendations .
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED to send the recommendations and inspection reports on the
property of William Tsigakos and Peter Brountzas and Anthony J. and
Dorothy A. DeMaula, to the '.Town Board for their consideration.
Vote of:`the.�.Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski
After completing a field inspection, September 1.0, 1981 on the property
of William Tsigakos and Peter Brountzas, the Southold Town Planning
Board recommends denial on the change of zone "A" Residential and
Agricultural District to "B" Light .Business for the following reasons:
1 . The lot is severely under the required use for the
property zoning change. It is less than 20% of the
required area.
2 . It would be hazardous for the business operations in
regard to traffic flow.
3 . The configuration does not comply 'i;,Jth,good zoning
practices because it is too small .
4 . This board is very doubtful that the New York State or
County would give curb cuts for ingress or egress, as
it would cause severe traffic hazards at the intersection. .
Regarding the same day inspection of the property of Anthony J. and
Dorothy A. DeMaula, the-:Southold Town Planning Board recommends
approval on the change of zone "A" Residential and Agricultural Dis-
trict to "C" Light for the following reasons:
1 . The configuration of the property conforms with the area
stipulated under the zoning classifications .
2 . Reasonable extension of the existing C-1 use to the North
of the property.
3 . Consistant with the development plan for the promotion of
agricultural and commercial fishing.
4 . The residential use of the property is inhibited by the
terrain, as Lilco has high tension running through the
premises .
(14) 9/1 1
Edwards-Reiche Bros . - Committee gave a field inspection report.
The Board agreed that Mr. Price, Esq. must go ta`.the ZBA for approval .
A letter is to be sent to Mr. Price requesting additional maps of
the area.
On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, �_it was
RESOLVED that the planning board approve the conditions set forth
by the ZBA of Donald C. DeLalla.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski
Staller site plan__- Committee report on the field inspection noted
that lots 13 - 18 are long and deep. It .was the board' s agreement
that covenants be written stipulating no further subdivisions on
any of the parcels in the future. A name is to be given to this proposed
subdivision. New maps need to be drawn, as the board did not view
the sketch map favorably. .
Being no further business coming before this board, Mr. Orlowski made
a motion, seconded by Mr. Latham, and carried, to adjourn. Meeting
adjourned at 9: 55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Susan E. 'Long, Secretary
Henry, . . Raynor, Jr. , Chairman