HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-05/06/1985 �FFo�
P D
T LD
v05 4F
s � Y ,
Southold, N.Y.. 11971
(516) 765-1938
The Southold Town Planning '--,Board had a regular meeting at
May 6 , 1985 at 7 :30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road,
Southold.
Present. were:
Chairman Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Member William 'F. Mullen, Jr.
Member G. Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Member Richard Ward
Member Kenneth Edwards
Executive Administrator. Victor Lessard
Town Planner David Emilita
7 :30 p.m. Public hearing on the question of approval of the
' major subdivision of Blue Horizons located , at Peconic, 7 lots
on 55 .7 acres .
i
Mr. Orlowski: I will dispense with the reading of the metes
and bounds , if there is any problem with that, with anyone, please
let me know. I have proof of publication in the Suffolk TImes ,
signed by Anna Lekkas and nc)tcr-i"z<.ed by Margaret Young, and
proof of publication in the Long Island TraVler- Watchman signed
by Pat Wood and notorized by Barbara Forbes . We have the filing
fee, correspondence from Health Services , correspondence from the
Department of Planning, . Everything else is in order. At this
time, I will ask if there are any objections to this subdivision?
Hearing none . Are there any endorsements to the subdivision?
Hearing none . Anyone out there neither, pro nor con, but with
some information pertaining to this subdivision that may be of
information to this Board? Hearing none . Any questions from the
Board? Mr. Mullen, (none) ; Mr. Latham, (none) ; Mr. Ward, (none) ;
Mr. Edwards , (none) . Being no further questions , I will declare
this hearing closed and thank you for °coming down.
On a motion made by Mr. Edwards , seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes
of the regular meeting of January 21, 1985 .
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Page 3 5/6/85
Briscoe Smith cont.
from the Town Board.
Mr. Orlowski: ' I will dispense with the reading of the metes
and bounds ; if. there is any objection, please let me know.. None.
We have proof of publication in the Suffolk TImes , signed. by
Anna Lekkas and notorized by Margaret Young. We have proof of
publication in the Long Island Traveler Watchman signed by Pat
Wood and notorized by Barbara Forbes . We have proof of publication
in The Day :.newspaper signed by LJ Zielenski and notorized- by
Beverly Prescott.. No correspondence. from Suffolk County yet.
We have health services approval. We have the filing fee, and
everything is in order. At this time, I:(w_ill ask if there
are any objections to this subdivision.?
Mr. Wainwright: Yes , Mr. Chairman, I am objecting, do you want
me to come up at this time?
Mr. Orlowski: Yes, please. State your name and your objection.
Mr. Wainwright: Thank you. My name it Wainwright, Stuyvesant
Wainwright. I 'm a foreigner because I come from Wainscott, the
other side, on the South Fork. ' But, I am familiar with Southold,
and familair with Fishers Island as I represented both. Southold
and Fishers Island in Congress for nine years . And, I remember
well the people on Fishers Island always complain that they are
second hand cousins and -second citizens because they are never
fully heard and I 've found that to be untrue. Am sure that
the Southold Planning Board will give this very careful consideration.
I represent a Mrs . Elizabeth Parkinson Cobb, a resident of many,
many; years of the Town of Southold on Fishers Island. Mrs . Cobb
owns a-piece of property which is centered on the map. As you
yourself can see. I might say that I 'm at somewhat of a disadvantage
because your very nice clerk informed me that this hearing was
coming up and I . asked her if she would send me the papers on
Thursday and, because .I .could not come over here. I went to
a funeral in Washington on Thursday night, and got back Wednesday.
And, I did not have the file this morening.._ But, I do have a
preliminary subdivision that was , it is dated 1981 . I don't
the current- _ survey, ..Mr. Chairman. What I would apreciate,
seeing that I am not adequately informed, and not having the
. . ' advantage of studying this carefully. Whether I would be
allowed to submit to you and the )-members of the Board a
written. statement in opposition so I won't waste your time here .
I would, and in that written statement I will enclose a copy of
the closing letter. A closing letter is. a letter that Mrs ..
Cobb received from her lawyer at. the -.time she purchased the
property, because in the closing letter, which comes from the
firm Milbank.,. Hadley and Tweed, the same firm that the
gentlemen who is putting the subdivision in here is a partner.
It states. that Mrs . Parkinson has the option to buy certain
pieces , and as I just received the copy of this closing letter
today, and would like to submit to the Boar d for thier
. pursual, I '. 11 make sufficient xeroxs for each .,-!member of the
Board. Being inadequately prepared at this time, I will just
ask your indulgence, obviously you are not going to come to
a conclusion because I heard you state that you do not have
the County's . report at this time.. So, I won't hold anything
up. For example, I don't know if a SEORA statement has been
filed, part I and whether the Town has complied with Part II .
Page 4 5/6/85
Mr. Wainwright:. Because this is all waterfront property.
Is one in the file, because if so, I would like a copy of that.
It' s points like that I. would bring up to the Board:.
With your induldgence, how much time will you. give me , because,
I ' ll have to get a--hold of a copy of this map�--Iand study it.
Mr. Orlowski: We have 90 days before we make any decisions
Mr. Wainwight : Plenty of time, thank you very much.
Mr. Orlowski: 45 days, excuse me.
Mr. Wainwright: 45 days?
Mr. Orlowski: Yes . Okay, is there anyone else out there with
any objection to this minor subdivision? Is there anyone out
there neither pro nor con but may have some input for the Board
in regard to this subdivision? Hearing none, questions from the
Board, I ' ll start with Mr. Edwards , since this is his area. Mr.
Edwards .
Mr. Edwards : . Yes , thank you Mr. Chairman. I was hoping that
the applicant would be here or a representative because I have
a number of questions to ask him. I did a field inspection on
the site, I 'm very concerned about Lot No. 3 and 4 , because
of the terrain, I personally don' t feel that there is a building
site on Lot NO. 3 . I have some questions about the right-of-way
that runs down betweeen lots 3 to Mrs . Parkinson' s piece of land,
and also some questions. about the right-of-way at the foot, on
the water, of Lot No. 3 , a 20' right-of-way. It doesn't say
whose right-oE-way it is, or who it is for. I really don't
think there is a building site on Lot No.3 , and possible a
farily good house location on Lot No. 4 , I would suggest that he
re-design his map and maybe include Lot No. 3 to Lot No.4 and
create one lot.
Mr. Orlowski: Okay, anything else?
Mr. Edwards : Not at this time.
Mr . . Orlowski: Mr. Mullen, (none) ; Mr. Latham. (None) ; Mr. Ward?
Mr.Ward: Just in support in what Mr. Edwards said, Lot No. 3
really is the prime drainage area for the other lots . It is a
low area that is collecting drainage.
Mr. Orlowski: Okay, this subdivision was granted relief from the
two-acre zoning by the Town Board. It definetly appears that there
is a problem with Lot No. 3 , as stated on the map, countours
are based on mean low tide, which appears to bearly give Lots 3 and
4 just enough buildable area. So, we have to address this before
we come to any decision. Being as there are no further questions ,
I will declare this hearing closed.
Page 5 5/6/85
Meadow Farms- The Board reviewed this proposal for a change
of zone from A-Residential to M multiple located at Main Road,
Southold. Mr. Klatsky was present for this discussion.
This proposal is for 72 units, proposed for moderate housing.
Mr.Mullen questioned the concentration stating that the 72 units
on 18 acres does not take into account the roads and open
areas, therefore, a heavier concentration would exist. Mr.
Klatsky stated that generally the density is taken on the gross
area, not after deductions for roads , etc . Mr. Klatsky stated
that the coverage is under 15%, and in the hamlet zone that
density would be permittdd. Mr. Mullen stated that his feeling
is that it is that it will be too heavy a concentration, he
felt that it was not affordable, moderate housing, and he
was opposed to a condominium complex for this type of project.
Mr. Mullen also stated that he disagreed with -the monthly
maintenance fees, and he was oposed to the way it was submitted
at this time. Mr. Latham stated that he needed:,.more time to
review it. Mr. Ward stated that he felt Meadow Farms was a
good idea, but the condo arrangement could be a problem. Mr.
Ward stated that although it was not "affordable Housing" it was
moderate housing and that was needed. Mr. Ward stated that
the concept of moderate housing was not opposed by the Board,
however, there was a question on the condominium arrangement.
Mr. Ward suggested a joint meeting with the Health Department
since it was their requirement that the association be
condominium. Mr. Edwards stated that he suppported Mr. Ward' s
comments . Mr. Klatsky stated that the proposal was started
in December in 1984 , and application was made to theTown Board
and the Health Department. Mr.Klatsky stated thay had tried
to answer all of the Board' s questions . He stated that it was
the Health Department' s requirement that a condominimum association
be formed, it was not the applicant' s choice . He said , though,
that in a higher density area there are certain advantages in
having an association and that is that the maintenance is
split amoung the homeowners . Mr. Klatsky said that when there
is a large development and no association, the maintenance is
not kept up, therefore, the Town and future buyers become upset.
Mr. Klatsky stated that he hoped the Town Planning Board would
look into the condominimium concept. He also stated that there
would not be any extra amenities such as a pool, the maintanence
would be limited to grounds and exterior work. Mr. Klatsky
stated that he felt a recommendation by the Planning Board at this
point would not eliminate them from further recommendations
upon site plan approval . Mr. Klatsky said that prior to the
Town Board holding a public hearing, the County Planning Commission
also needed to respond. Mr.Klatsky also stated his concern that
the longer they wait for approval, the more costly it could be
for the structures to be built. Mr.Orlowski stated that the
affordable housing is a goal of the Board and the density is
around the guidelines in the Master Plan which has been presented
to the Town Board. Mr. Orlowski stated that there were still a
number of questions that needed to be answered, namely Health
Department, Highway Superintendent review, Town Board made a
determination of significant effect, and requested a DE-TS to
be done. Mr. Orlowski stated that it. might be premature to
make a recommendation to theTown Board, since they were not
ready to take any action on the zone change . Mr. Orlowski
stated that prior to any action by the Planning Board they would
Page 6 5/6/85
Meadow Farms Cont..
like to review the condominimum ownership, correspondence from
the Highway Superintendent regarding the road widths , County
Health Services regarding the sewer. Mr. Orlowski stated that
the plan has good intentions and is working with the Town's
guide-lines —Mr. Klatsky stated that although there was no
correspondence from Mr. Dean, they had two meetings with him.
They had submitted a memo to the Board reflecting the content
of the discussion and tentative conclusions . Mr. Mullen
stated that he felt the Board had moved very dilligently
with this since it was referred by the Town Board in March.
Mr. Mullen stated that letter of 4/9 $25 a month was mentioned
as the maintenance fee for 72 tenants to raise $21, 000 a year
for mainenance of the exterior. However, he noted that in
the evironment assessment form, page 3 , that there will be
two people who will be employed after construction. Mr. Mullen
stated that he did not. believe that two people could be
employed at $21, 000 per year. Mr. Klatsky said that they
would not be full time workers . Mr. Mullen stated that he
did not see how this cost per year could cover all the
maintenance including possibly roads and sewage treatment.
Mr. Klatsky stated that they had received some bids and
prepared a tentative budget which could be made available.
Mr. Klatsky mentioned that Mr. Dean had reviewed road width
conceptual approaches on the roads and possible dedication,
however, there was no firm committment from Mr. Dean. However
the final road and drainage plans will have to be approved
by the Highway Superintendent. Mr.Klatsky expressed his concern
with keeping the project moving so that it does not loose
momentum. Mr. Mullen explained that the Board was proceding
with it ' s review, however, because it is the first project,
they must take everything into consideration. Mr. Orlowski
questioned the building square footage. Mr. Klatsky stated
that until they have definite prices from contractors , and
on the water treatment, they are using those areas . Mr.
Klatsky stated that they will schedule the meetings and contact
the Board as to the time and date.
Mr. George L. Penny was present for a pre-submission conference
to discuss his site plan for Penny Lumber for construction of
a 50' X 102 ' storage building. This is located at Mattituck,
on County Route 48 . Mr. Penny stated that the. new building
would be back to back with an existing building. The new building
will be the same size and color. Mr. Lessard pointed out the
set-back for the new building would have to conform to the set-
back for the existing building which was about 5 ' .
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer this site
plan for Penny Lumber, for the construction of a storage building
located at Mattituck, to the building department for certification.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Page 7 5/6/85
Mr. Anthony Tohill, attorney, was present to discuss the set-
off of Louise O. Day located at Indian Neck Lane, Peconic.
This proposal is for a set-off of 5 . 8 acres from 13 .7 acres .
Mr. Tohill explained the nature of this application was to
separate the existing house from the existing garage apartment.
Mr Tohill stated that the approval of this set-off would make
this property conforming .since the apartment has been occupied
as a residence . Mr. Tohill stated that he would be willing to
covenants against any further subdivison. Mr. Ward recommended
moving the lot line proposes slightly North to provide more upland
for Lot No. 2 . It was the consensus of the Board to request this .
Mr. Tohill indicated he would be agreeable to this . It was
the consensus of the Board to make a field inspection prior
to any action. The Board also requested six surveys amended
as per their recommendation.
The 8: 30 p.m. appointment with Janet Geassa for Joseph Crenshaw
had been cancelled by the attorney.
The Cove at Southold- This application for 33 condominiums has
received certification from the Building Department. The Board
reviewed the correspondence from the Suffolk County Planning
Commission approving with conditions . It was noted that
there were no approvals received from the Health Department. It
was the consensus of the Board to held any action on this
proposal until approvals had been obtained from the Health
Department for the water and sewer.
Peconic Homes- The Board reviewed this proposal for 4 lots
on 45 acres at Sound Avenue, Laurel. It was noted that some
of the lots are very steep, and the Board indicated there concern
to create buildable lots . It was the consensus of the Board to
make a field inspection prior to any further action. It was
also noted that there was a letter of objection from an .adjoining
lot owner who uses the current right-of-way and questions Mr.
Horton' s authority to change this . (Mr. Horton is the developer)
The letter was from Mr. Daniel Jacoby, who was present. He expressed
his objections to the Board stating that the new right-of-way
proposed goes through a deep ravine making it impossible to get
to his house from the road, and it is 200' from the house. Mr.
Jacoby stated that he did not object to the right-of-way, however,
as long as the developer provided a way to get to his house.
It was the consensus of the Board to request that Mr. Jacoby
and Mr. Horton schedule a meeting to resolve the right-of-way
question. The Board will conduct' a field inspection prior to
any action.
Page 8 5/6/85
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded- by Mr.. Latham., it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the
set-off of Agnes McGunnigle, located at Southold, map dated
July 17 , 1984 and amended February 8, 1985 and March 20, 1985 .
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
It was noted that the applicant was not aggreeable to covenants
and restrictions against further subdivision since one of the
parcels would be proposed as a minor subdivision all having road
frontage . David Emilita warned the Board about acting on the
set-off without having seen the minor subdivision plans .
Mr. JohnCostello. was.,present fora preliminary site plan presentation
for his property at Moores Lane , Greenport and the proposal for
affordable housing. Mr. Costello explained that he had proposed
expanding the residential lots to 76 with a cluster design.
He stated that the open space included 11 acres with buffering.
Mr.Costello stated that he was keeping the lots small so that
they could be affordable, and he reduced the area on the commercial
lots so there would be 9 building lots . It was noted that another
concern was traffic access onto Midd'lton Road, and therefore,
access was provided onto Moores Lane . Mr. Costello submitted
road profiles for the Board' s review. Mr. Costello indicated
that he would like to use the Planning Board's expertise on
this project. He indicated that- until the parcel is annexed
to the Village of Greenport, which proposal was before the Town
Board, theproject still remained in the Town of Southold and
the Planning Board had jurisdiction over it. Mr. Costello
anticipated that all the lots would be under $20, 000. Mr.
Mullen requested a spread sheet on the project. Mr. Costello
stated that in time he would: submit this . Mr. Costello expressed
his hopes that these lots would provide homes for the working
people of the town with what he referred to as "sweat equity"
Mr. Mullen questioned if Mr. Costello would offer some lots
to the Town. Mr. Costello indicated that he would consider this
possibility. Mr. Orlowski explained that the proposal for
annexation is pending and questioned if Mr.Costello would make
a change of zone application. Mr. Costello stated that he is
willing to make a change of zone and get as much input as
possible. Mr. Costello explained that the proposal to annex
would reduce the cost for water and sewer which must be brought
in from Greenport and he hoped that the annexation would be
approved. Mr. Ward suggested that the recharge areal,be placed
along Moores Lane to go with the buffer. Mr. Costello stated
that he is having tests done on the water and would donate to
the municipality. Mr. WArd also suggested that they could go
to the Village of Greeport recharge area with piping rather
than creating a recharge basin and that should be looked into.
Mr. Ward also suggested that all access be along one line, one
right-of-way and put all commercial to one curb cut. Mr.
Costello explained that he was trying to keep the residential
away from the commercial and he had increased the residential.
He also noted that it was buffered50/50. Mr. Costello stated
that he did not want the commercial area to suffer because there
Page 9 5/6/85
Costello cont.
were alot of existing businesses that needed expanding area, and
he would like it kept to one .area. He emphasized that he would
not allow any retail businesses at this site since he did not
want to take away from the downtown Greenport retail bus;inesses ..
Mr. Costello said that he would covenant and restrict the
property from having any retail shops . Mr. Costello stated that
he had a drainage plan and the Board requested that he submit
copies of that to them. Mr. Costello also indicated that he
will contact the village of Greenport for drainage as mentioned
by Mr. Ward. Mr. Orlowski explained that this is only a
preliminary presentation so that Mr. Costello could obtain the
Board' s advice.
Charles Simmons-Attorney Abigail Wickham was present to discuss
this minor subdivision located at Laurel. This application was
also before the Board of Appeals for insufficient area variances
on Lots NO. 1 and 2 . The Board questioned why the lots could
not have the minimum lot width of 175 ' since there was enough
area to accomodate it. Mrs . Wickham stated that her client
intended to sell Lots No. 1 and 2 and build on the remaining
acreage on the Sound. Mr. Simmons wanted privacy and felt that
if he could build on the remaining area he could position the
house far away from the lots . The Board suggested that he
place covenants and restrictions on the lots and then make them
conforming. Mrs . Wickham indicated that she had mentioned this
to her client .previously and it was felt that ownership was
better than covenants and restrictions since they could be broken.
It was noted that Mr. Simmons has an offer pending to sell the
development rights to the Farmland Committee on the remainder of
the farm. Mr. Orlowski requested that if the FarmlandCommittee
is not able to purchase the development rights , that it contain
a covenant as to no further subdivision. Mrs . Wickham stated
that she would have to get back to the Board on this matter after
she discusses this with her client. Regarding the lot width,
the Board stated that they could not make a favorable recommendation-
to the Board of Appeals considering that there is enough land
area to comply with the minimum requirements , and it would- only
mean adding 25 ' to each lot since they are proposed for 150' width.
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr.Mullen it was .
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the following .
recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. regarding the application
for Charles Simmons at Laurel :
The Planning Board recommends that proposed Lots No. 1 and No. 2
have the minimum required lot width of 175 ' since there is enough
area to accomodate -this.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Page 10 5/6/85
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr.Latham, it was.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept and
request compliance with Inspector John W. Davis ' report No.
440 regarding the work within the access road of the subdivision
of Herodotus Damianos at Southold.'
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward, the following
action was taken:
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law
State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, .Section -
617 . 10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is
hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for
the action described below has determined that the project will not
have a significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The minor subdivision of John and-Catherine Simicich is four
lots on 11 .356 acres located. at Mattituck. Tax. Map No. 1000-113-7-12 .
The project has been determined not to have a significant
effect on the environment for the following reasons :
An environmental assessment has been submitted which
indicated that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the project
be implemented as planned.
Because there has been no comment from the Department. of
Environmental Conservation in the alotted . time it is
assumed that there are no comments or objections from that
agency.
The Suffolk County Health Department has no objection to our
lead agency designation. They have received an application and
it is incomplete . It appears that. the project can be served by
sewer subsurface disposal system, upon adequate subsoil conditions ,
and an individual water system upon adequate potable water supply.
The Department is requesting a new survey showing .the entire
30. 1 acre parcel .
The project will meet all the requirements of the Code
of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations .
Further information can be obtained by contacting Diane M-. Schultze. ,;
Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, New York
11971
Vote of: the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen., Latham, Ward., Edwards
i
Page 11 5/6/85
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that whereas , a formal application for the approval of a
subdivision plat entitled "Mohring Enterprises II" located at
Peconic was submitted to the Planning Beard on December 13 , 1984
and, filing fee was paid on December 13 , 1-984 , .and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said subdivision application
and plat at the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on April 15 , 1985 at
7 :30 p.m. , and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town
of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and application,
NOW, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the application of "Mohring Enter-
prises II " for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by Young
and Young, last amendmert dated October 16 , 1984 , be approved and the
chairman be authorized to endorse approval_ on said subdivision plat .
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
`A
Cranberry Acres at Southold-The Chairman read correspondence from
the Suffolk County. Planning Commission approving this subdivision
with 7 conditions . This subdivision for 4 lots on 28 has
had a public hearing, at which time there was discussion of
reducing the density to 3 lots due to the wetlands . Mr. Raynor,
agent, for the applicant indicated that he was still waiting fpp
papers on possible donation of a lot. Mr. Raynor indicated,also
that his client was open to clustering the lots on the west end
of the property. It was noted that since the lots all exceed
5 acres, the subdivision is exempt from Article 6 . Mr. Raynor
said that his client is also open to any comments or recommendations .
from the Board. It was the consensus of the Board to hold this
for further review.
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr.Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch
map for the minor subdivision of John and Frances Divello
containing 4 lots on 4 .38 acres located at Mattituck, map dated
March 3 , 1980.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Page 12 5/6/85
Henry Lytle- Attorney Abigail Wickham was present for the discussion
on the minor subdivision of 2 lots on 9 acres at Soundview Avenue,
Peconic. The Board reviewed the correspondence from Mrs . Wickham
regarding the existing lot within the 9 acres and the rignt-of-
way to it. Mrs . Wickhan explained that she had prepared a deed
to eliminate the lot and right-of-way but was requesting approval
of the subdivision prior to recording it with. the County Clerk.
The property in question was a lot transferred from Henry Lytle
and wife to Henry Lytle along with a right-of-way. The proposed
deed would transfer the property back to Henry Lytle and wift.
The Board requested clarification on this so that three lots
would not be created as a result of the subdivision. The
Board requested that the deed be recorded and covenants and
restrictions as to no further subdivision be submitted prior
to any Board action.
The following new proposals were set for a field inspection:
Ernest Wilsberg-lot line change for 2 lots on 1 . 1 acres at Ole
Jule Lane, Mattituck.
Pat Lockwood and Pat Lesnikowski-set-off of 52 ,600 sq. ft.
located at North Drive, Mattituck. (Subdivision of Shore Acres)
It .was noted that this application is pending with the Board
of Appeals for insufficient area variances .
Nick Ippolito-set-off of 5 ,500 sq.ft. from 17, 000 sq. ft. at Carole
Road, private, Arshamomaque.
Long Island Shores-4 lots on 5 .2 acres at Maddle Road, Greenport.
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr.Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site
plan of Lynn Sciora revised April 9, 1985 subject to asphalt
parking. This proposal is for construction of an addition for
handicapped bathroom facilities , and had received Board of Appeals
approval and certification from the Building Department.
Vote of theBoard: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board amend their resolution
of April 1, 1985 regarding the application of Thomas Perillo and
. approve it as a set-off (106-13) for 2 lots on 3 . 1974 acres subject
to:
1. Review of the Suffolk County Planning Commission since this
property borders Mattituck Creek.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Page 13 5/6/85
Celic site plan- The Board reviewed this site plan for an addition
to the existing office located at Marlene Lane, Mattituck. It was
noted that the site plan did not comply with the Board' s recommendation
that there be no cars backing out onto Marlene Lane. The plan
still showed 5 spaces an Marlene Lane.
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mt. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board request a site
plan from Celic in accordance with the Board's recommendation
regarding parking on Marlene Lane.
Vote of the Board: Ayes :Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Founders Village- The Board reviewed report No. 442 from John
W. Davis regarding the use of pavement rather than bluestone
at Founder Village condominium at Southold. Mr. Davis indicated
that the pavement road was better than what was originally
required and Mr. Dean concurred with the report. Mr. Ward
noted that there should be more plantings on the site.
On a motion made by Mr. Edwards , seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, following a field
inspection, recommend to the Building Department that a certificate
of occupancy be issued for the site plan of Founders Villa e
at Southold subject to the planting of one street tree 2er unit
and a 6-month review.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a mo.tion 'made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr.Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, following a field
inspection, recommend to the Building Department that a certificate
of occupancy be issued for the site plan of Peter Luhrs for an-.,.
auto repair shop at North Road, County Rte. 48, Southold.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that .the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the
Building Department, following a field inspection, that a certificate
Of occupancy he ; �z„P o he He11eni Snack Bar at East Marion
subie�t tc? e�oval or_ relocation of the telephone booths at the
ingress .
Vote of theBoard: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Page 14 5/6/85
Grand View Estates- Mr. Latham made a field inspection of lot
No. 1 within this subdivision .at Orient, in order to determine
if the bluff plantings requested were there. He reported that
they had been planted and were holding.
On a motion ".made by"-=Mr: •Latham; seconded -by 'Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the
Building Department that a certificate of occupancy be issued
for the house located at Lot No. 1 within the subdivision of
Grandview Estates at Orient.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Being no further business to come before the Board, on a motion made
by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, and carried, the meeting was
adjourned at 9: 53 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
Southold Town Planning Board
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. airman
RECEIVED AND FILED BY
THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
DATE
Town Clerk, Town of Sout d