HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-04/15/1985 r
� P
T LD
s
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
The Planning Board held a regular meeting on April 15 , 1985
at 7 :30 p.m . at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold.
Present:
Chairman Bennett Orlowski, Jr- .
Member William F. Mullen, Jr.
Member Kenneth Edwards;
Member Richard G. Ward
MemberG. Ritchie Latham, Jr. (7 : 45 p.m.)
Town Planners David Emilita and James Bryer
Victor Lessard, Executive Administrator
7 :30 Public hearing on the question of approval of the minor
subdivision of Mohring Enterprises, Inc. located at Main Road,
Peconic. Containing 34 .5 acres .
Mr. Orlowski: We have proof of publication in the Suffolk Times,
signed by Anna Lekkas and notorized by Ann Abate; proof of
publication i n.the Long Is.aand Traveler Watchman signed by Pat
Wood and not.orized by Barbara Forbes . I will dispense with
the reading of the metes and bounds , if there - are any objections
, t o that, please (;let me know. (none) We have the filing fee,
correspondence from Suffolk County Planning, we have a copy
of the covenant and restrictions which have been filed with
the County, and averything appears to be in order. - I will
ask if there are objections to this minor subdivision? Hearing
none. Is there any endorsements of this minor subdivision?
Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr.'4, If it pleases the Board, Mr.
Chairman, I am Henry Raynor and I am agent for Mohring
Enterprises . You are well aware it is the intent of the
applicant to subdivide the property into 4 building lots ,
the sizes of which being between 5 . 1 acres and 19 acres .
It has been questioned, and the proposed right-of-way
construction will meet all the Planning Board Inspectors
requirement, and we will further stipulate to construct
guard rails around the pond area located between lots 2 and
3 . The Department of Health Services has stamped each map
with approval and the Planning Board has received the proper
covenants and restrictions as_ stipulated in their resolution
of September 24 , 1984 and we have further addressed all the
questions regarding Suffolk County Planning Commission and for
these reasons, respectfully request that this be approved. Thank you.
r
Page 2 4/15/85
Mr. Orlowski: Is there any other endorsemsnts of this subdivision?
Hearing none. Is there any one neither pro nor con but may have
information pertaining to this subdivision that may be of use to
the Board? Hearing none . Any questions from the Board; Mr. Mullen,
(none) ; Mr. Ward (none) ; Mr. Edwards (none) ; Okay, being no further
questions, I will declare the hearing closed and thank you.
7 :45 `p.m. Public hearing on the question of approal of the minor
subdivision of Cranberry Acres located .at Southold. 4 lots on
24 acres .
Mr. Orlowski: We have proof of publcation in the Suffolk TImes,
signed by Anna Lekkas and notorized by Ann Abate, we also have
proof of publication in the Long Island Traveler Watchman signed
by Pat Wood and notorized by 'Barbara Forbes . I will dispense
with reading of the metes and bounds, if there any objections ,
please U'let me know. (none) We have the filing fee, correspondence
from Department of Health Services , Suffolk County, correspondence
from the Department of Planning, we" have covenants and restrictions
which have not been filed yet. Everything appears to be in order.
At this time, I will ask if there any objections to this minor
subdivision?
Ruth Oliva:. Ruth .Oliva, NFEC, we objedt to this subdivision, No. 1
becausev of this minor subdivision is a saltwater marsh. We do not
the majority
feelthere is enough buildable upland to allow a subdivision to be
granted. Number 2 , I do believe that with our own wetland regulations ,
there has to be a 75 ' building set-back, I dor:not believe that .
on, at least lots No. 3. and 4 , the set-backs can beemet, perhaps
only No. 1 and No. 2 . Thridly, being as this is over 5 acres ,
each . lot, the Board of Health can not review upon this , and I.
think it is incumbent upon this. Board, therefor to protect the
health and safety of any future owner in that area. I do believe
there is a pY'oblem with the water with nitrates , I also would
like to remind the Board that these lots are slightly elevated
with a buildable area is any cesspool, that would be put in would
definitely drain into this marsh. As you know, we are all trying
to preserve our wetlands . Thank you very much.
Mr. Orlowski: Okay, is there anyone else with objectionssto this
minor subdivision? State your name .
MR. Robert Pike: Thank you, I am Robert Pike a lawyer with offices
at Sound'_Avenue, Baiting Hollow. I guess.. I should call it the
city of Baiting Hollow with our new seven--story skyscrapers.
I am a lawyer who specializes in environmental law and represent
a wide number of environmental groups , in addition I am a professer
of environmental law and teach at the Long Island University in
Southampton. I am here tonight representing two of the neighbors
Pete and Betty Schloss and Robert Gazza, who own property across
the street from the particular property and they have asked me
to appear tonight to address a number of their objections . I
would say at the outset that the applicant' s agent has shown
a fair amount of good faith in the dss.cassing the case with me "
and has already shown some consideration to the environement
r ,
Page 3 4/15/85
Mr. Pike: by revising the application to its current form, it
is a great improvement, that does not mean it is purfect and
I have a number of thoughts on the current plan that has been
presented. I would like to thank Mr Raynor for his willingness
to address the concerns that have been raised. I realize diversly
that that is slightly subserviant because he has divested some
health department review of the project as Ms . Oliva has pointed
out. The fundamental problem here is fairly simply demonstrated
by one of my client' s , Mr. Gazza, experience across the street.
Mr. Gazza has the unique distinction of being the only of the
client on the North Fork that has not a single filter, not a
double filter, not a tertiary filter, but a four part system to
treat his water from the same lense that this property, particularly
lots No. 3 and 4 would be serviced by if wells were drived on the
individual lot. I know that Mr. Raynor may have some objections
to that, and we may get a chance tD discuss this later but Mr.
Gazza has the single most expensive water treatment program that
I have ever seen, and in fact hastto conserve his use of his
water, forexample, he will infact wait after a substantial rainfall
has taken place to use the water. You have a very, very small
water lense there and a verry, very, serious supply problem. . I
can provide further documentation on that, I have a list of Mr.
Gazzattreatment system if the Board would like it. I would reiterate
we are concerned with area calculations in the fact that the
overwhelmining majority of all of the lots , and they are latgee
lots , but the overwhelming majority is -':r_a'.formerly connected
tidal wetlands under NY State Law and is entirely undevelopable.
Those portions of two lots, Lots No. 3 and 4, that are above
DEC jurisdiction are tiny, and I would -question—and asky-therBoard,
to, address in the affirmative the matter of whether they meet
the minimum requirements set by the Town. I think there is a
more important problem here, and that is the way people buy and
sell real estate, and their expectations upon buying and selling
intheir Town. There is the idea that if this Board were to
approve this subdivision that you would end up with four buildable
lots . And, I am not sure that is the case but the average
practitioner of law, upon subdivision approval from the Town would
authorize his client to go ahead and sell the lots . My concern
is that an unsuffisticated purchaser would not go through the
time and expense to determine whether he had a buildable lot,
would be unable to obtain affirmative representatives in a
contract to buy the property -that it was a buildable lot and
might in fact under Town Law have a buildable lot and find
himself ina position of not being able to build on it, two of
the lots , particulary, 'Lots 3 and 4 . My concern then is the
Town not persist in this matter and take affirmative steps
to make sure that sort of result is not donee. I have two
basic suggestions in that regard, first of all, in part of
my discussions with Mr. Raynor, I suggested to him and his
client that they look at the possibility of dedicating
major portions , of this site, not to a nature conservancy,
but to a relatively new land preservation entity that exists
on the end of Long Island, Peconic Land Trust. I spoke
earlier to a gentleman running that agency, Mr. Halsey,
and he indicated that he was very interested in looking in
the property. Obviously, my clients would be very grateful
if he would donate the entire property to Peconic Land Trust
and take the appropriate action at that time. Assumming that
won't fall from heaven, I have an alternative suggestion which
Page 4 4/15/85
Mr. Pike : is that they consider deeding away lot No. 3 , Lot No.4
and an easement to all of the wetlands that is not currenity
contained' on Lots 3 and 4, to the Peconic Land Trust. I know
that Mr. Halsey is interested in discussing that matter with
him and I would ask and I believe he is also interested and
has indicated a willingness to discuss that point. Taking a
step further and assuming that that matter does not develop
into fruition I would take it a step further and ask that this
Board in considering the possiblity of approving this wif'
all the other objections fall by the wayside that they impose
a number of extraordinary conditions on the property to solve
the problem which I indicated before, by way of condition and
a permenantcovenants and restriction on theland that would
run with the land that the applicant demonstrate compliance
with and approval of a water supply and sewage sS7stem in
compliance with current county regulations , and that would
be as to both water supply and sewage disposal . I think the
imposition of those conditions , in addition bb the others
which the Town would normally apply to insure that a theoretical
approval of the lot in the Towncf Southold would in fact be
an applicable buildable lot for any purchaser. Those are my
basic objections thank you for your consideration of all of them.
Thank-. yo.0.
Mr. Orlowski: Are there any other objections to this subdivision?
Ernest Wilzenski-My name is Ernest Wilzenski . My property, which
is directly adjacent to this subdivision. I 've owned this property
about 10 years . As you all }know this is a very serious water
situation. In to years I. have had three different well points .
And, I have been fortunate, I have gone back into the same area
and have gotten good water. I would like to say that as Mr.
Gazza across the street, the problem is quite serious and I hope
the Board gives this consideration. Thank you.
Mr. Orlowski: Thank you. Anyother objections to the subdivision?
Jean Tiedke: I have a question if I may. The property would drain
into the creek which goes out by Suffolk Community College laboratory
right?
Mr. Orlowski: Across the street? Yes .
Jean Tiedke: Have any of you seen how that section of road floods
when there is high tide? It floods very severally down there.
Which indicates that alot of that property indeed comes under water.
And I would assume the pollution from improperly located or even
properly located cesspools could come out into that creek, past
the Community College laboratory.
Mr. Orlowski: Any other objections?
Joann ;:Osman: It is not an objection, just an observation. We live
on the corner of Bayview and Cedar Beach Road. We are aware of this
property area, because primarily of water that comes up. Fortunately
we don' t have it, we are on the corner. But it does , every hitlh
tide, every heavy rain that road is f-,l,00ded,. and it is impassible .
°=,qe F. Page 5 4/15/85
Mr. Orlowski: Any other objections? Hearing none. Is there
anyone hear'Lin favor of this subdivision?
Henry E. Raynor: Just for the record, my name is Henry Raynor,
and I 'm here for Mr. Gus Fink who is the contract vendee on the
propoerty. I should note that I have heard many of the suggestions
which have been given this evening from Mr. Pike. He and I have
conversed on the subject and have come to a reasonable conclusion.
First, it is the intent of the applicant to divide 24 .77 acres
into 4 lots . The size of the lots range anywhere from 5 . 1 acres
to 7 . 1 acres . This Board is well aware originally this was going
to be a major subdivision of seven which were voluntarily reduced
to four for environmental consideration by the applicant. There
are twelve acres of existing wetland son this proposed subdivision.
This is certified to in a`�report that I had Roderick Van Tuyl,
land surveyor. For the Board' s specific information, the lot
sizes proposed, take an arbitrary lot size inthe surrounding area,
vary anywhere from 3 to 15 times the size of the existing residential
lots . As you are well aware, the Department of Health Services
has stamped the approval . We have further water test done on the
situ--.quantity and quality with regard to salt water intrusion
regarding the discussion this evening. Krieger and Pump Corp.
on a letter dated the 16th of August, just an exceT.pt, it says
the well produces 40 gallons a minute after pumping 3000 gallons
of water for more than an hour there was no change in chlorides .
As this Board is well aware the averaget:;household pumps between
150 and 175 gallons per day. That would give you an idea as to
the amount,.:of water that is on the property.l I will draw you '
specifics to be as fair as possible to the fact that you were
to address the old lot No. 7 , the elevation on the property
and the westerly and southwesterly area is from where the water
table was drawn. It was drawn specifically there because
the applicant intends to utilize that section of the property
for the water system for the lots . So there is not a chance of
drawing and coming up with up with the problems of Mr. Gazza.
We have presented to the Planning Board a copy of the covenants
and restrictions , as per the resolution of the Planning Board.
We will file same with the County Clerk upon approval and we have
not filed them because Mr. Fink is the contract vendee to this
date . We have noted in a letter from Mr. Gahan, who is the
present property owner, that the original flooding on part of -
this property took place in the 1930 hurricane . It has been
the Suffolk County department of public works who got the
slue open on the property. Prior to that, that was grazing
pasture and it was cultivated as a cranberry bog. I thank
Mr. Pike for his information concerning the Peconic Land Trust
and will transform the information he has given me this evening
to Dr. Fink and subsequent to the Borad' s determination upon
this property we will take everything said at this hearing
into consideration. We are not about to go in-.and try to
plunder.. the property, we weren't going to go under the old
sketch approved map. Given this particular piece of property
we have used extreme lattitude in trying to be good neighbors
and for those reasons we expect that the pleasure of the
Board would be approval .
Mr . Orlowski: you are saying that each lot will be furnished`
Page 7 4/15/85
Mr. Orlowski: Okay, anyone else? Hearing none, any questions from
the Board, Mr. Mullen.
Mr. Mullen: Mr. Raynor, would it be possible for your client,
he has ddne a great Job going from seven to four, consider going
down to three?
Mr. Raynor: If that is a condition that the Board will place upon
it.
Mr. Mullen: Well, Mr. Pike requested the elimination of lots three
and four and I believe if we can get three out of four it will be
fairly equitable situation. I know the water situation is rough
down there and we are looking of a situation here of 27 acres
and Mr. Van Tuyl in September 1983 , he mentioned that 1/2 of it
is wetlands so I would iike to see if you could possibly get
together from four to three I think it would be a solution for
everybody concerned. It is not a cure, but it would be a helpd.
Mr. Raynor: In reference, Mr. Mullen, with regard to freshwater.
On the basis of tests that were pumped out we have a superElous
amount of water. Again, it is kind of a micro system for. the
Townshi.p, .we have water but in some places we .have too much of
it and in some places we don't have enough of it.
Mr. Mullen: But, if we have water what is the quality of the
water and we could have an extremely .wet season or a high
tide situation and it would. be very damaging to the deal. I
would still like you to consider that if you would.
Mr. Raynor: We will, sir.
Mr. Orlowski: Anyother questions , Mr. Latham? (none) , Mr. Ward?
Mr. Ward: Did you happen to consider along the along the dines
of what Mr. Mullen was saying, possibly clustering in the West
End on the basis of going as you normally would with a cluster
subdivision.
Mr. Raynor: Todate it has not been explored, particularly because
the-�.small size of the numbers of the units . Let me ask this, is the
Board ameniable to that type of clustering? I don't know how
to address that because we would leave less than 20 acres and the
criteria for a number of years has been that. If the Board would
choose to explore that, we are more than willing to explore that.
Mr. Orlowski: Anyother questions , Mr.Ward?
Mr. Ward: No, that was it.
Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Edwards , (none) , Mr. Bryeri-did you have any
comments on this , I know you have reviewed it.
Mr. Bryer: I have no questions , I would like to go over it again.
Mr. Orlowski: Being as there is no further questions , I will declare
this hearing closed and thank you all for coming down. And, we will
review all the ideas and input that we received tonight and make our
decision.
Page 6 4/15/85
Mr. Orlowski: with its own sewer and water.
Mr. Raynor: That can be done if that is a condition of approval
by this Board.
Mr.. Orlowski: Alright, if there anyone else in favor of this
subddvision? Hearing none, is there anyone neither pro nor
con but may have information pertaining to this subdivision which
may be of itnerest to the Board:
Betty Schloss : My name is Betty Schloss and I am a neighbor acrosse
the street from oneeof the entrances to the property. I would just
like to point out, there is a house on Cedar Beach Road were they
had to put in short lenght cesspools and they had to put in three
cesspools because the land. was so close to the water table andI
just wonder how :, if you have four lots with four good size
houses that the cesspool situation could be controled so that
you don' t have a problem that you are not looking forward to.
Mr. Orlowski: Anyone else.
Robert Pike: Just something was not clear to me about the
exchange here. Did you ask whether each lot would have one
well or if or that .they would share the same well?
Mr. Orlowski: No, I asked if each lot would have their own well.
Mr. Pike: It is my understanding that Mr. Raynor is suggesting that
there be one well on Lot No. 1 to supply all four lots .
Mr. - Raynor: We have the option presently, pending the Board' s
decision , to go forward in either direction. We would in this
case seek your guidance.
Mr. Orlowski: Each lot individually would have to be approved by
Suffolk County.
Mr. Raynor: To the best of my knowledge all of the lots will meet
the standards . We have had three tests done and three tests will
meet the present department standards . It is the option of this
Boardto put a aafety factor on that to assure that there is no
particular problem 4a
Mr. Orlowski: Is that sewer and water it will meet n.
Mr. Raynor: They will have to meet that in order to get the permits .
Mr. Orlowski: But right now you are saying throughtthe tests that
you have done.
Mr. Raynor: We have done test wells .
Mr. Orlowski: Okay.
Ernest Wilzenski: I would also like to add,oas I mentioned before,
that my home that I have adjacent to the property I tried to have
water for the well, but my water comes from my nextdoor neighbor.
My well comes from my next door neighbor, that is where I get my
water.
Page 8 4/15/85
Joann Osman: I think it would be a good idea if you all went
down and took a look at it.
Mr. Orlowski: We have many times .
Mr. Michale Hall, esq. was present for a pre-submission conference
to discuss the site plan of Nicholas Petikas for construction of
a building to contain a 2 ,000 square foot restaurant and 1000
square feet of retail use. This proposal is located at the corner
of Main Road and SoundcRoad, Graenport. Mr. Hall explained that
approximately 50% of the propoerty is in a B zone and the remaining
50% ,approximately, is in an A,.zone . He stated however, that
this may be on a down side effect, in other words , more of :the
property is actually zoned A. However, this would have to be
studied on the zoning to obtain the exact percentage . Mr. Orlowski
s id._.that the more stringent zone applies , therefore, there would
be a problem inc1developing this site. Mr. Orlowski said the
Board has reviewed about four proposals for this property over
the last few years , and due to the zoning, nothing has been
finalized with any of those plans . Mr. Hall questioned if
the building and parking were all in the B area of the property
if the problem would be lessoned. Mr. Hall said the property
was about 21 , 000 square feet. Mr. Orlowski said that rhinimum ,
quare footage required in a B zone :.:is 30, 000 and since it is
obvious that there is less than that, the Board would not
be in favor of this proposal . It was also noted that there could
be no -parking in the A zone. Mr. Latham noted that there is
a severe flooding problem in the road at this intersection.
Mr. Hall said that he realized that this proposal had to be
approved by the Board of Appeals , and it was recommended that
he receive the necessary variances prior to action by the
Planning Board. _
The appointment of Anthony Tohill was cancelled since Mr. Tohill
could not be. present. This will be rescheduled on the next
available agenda. This d1sc-fission was regarding the set-off
of Louise O. Day located at Indian Neck Road, Peconic.
On a motion made by Mr. Edwards , seconded by Mr. Latham., it was
RESOLVED that;-.the Southold Town Planning Board offer the following
comments to the Zoning Board` of Appeals regarding the proposed
minor subdivision of Guy acid Ruth Sobering located at Sound Avenue,
Mattituck to create 2 lots on 2 . 9 acres .
1 . The lots proposed are less than the current two-acre
zoning, and there appears to be a house and a foundation already
existing on the property upon field inspection.
Vote of the Board : Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwrards
Page 9 4/15/85
Charles DeLuca-TheBoard reviewed this proposal for 4 lotsDn
10.5 acres located at Main Road, Southold. Richard Lark, esq.
was present for this discussion. Mr. Lark noted that he had
received a permit from the DEC and explained that all building
would be above the 10 ' countour. Mr. Mullen requested covenants
and restrictions as to no further subdivision on Lot No. 1 which
contains 4 acres . This Board also requested that all access be
off the right-of-way so as not to create additional driveways
onto the Main Road. Mr. Lark was agreeable. to this .
On:_<a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch
map for the minor subdivision of Charles DeLuca, for 4 lots on
10.5 acres at Southold; plan dated July 24 , 1984 , subject to they
following:
1 . Covenants and restrictions as to no further subdivision in
perpetuity on Lot No. 1 .
It was also agreed thatthe right-of-way will serve as access
to all the lots and there will be no driveways onto Main Rod.d
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Abigail Wickham was present for a presubmission conference for
the site plan of Daniel Kaelin for the construction of a retail
store for lawnmowers located at Cox' s Lane, Cutch.ogue . Mr.
Orlowski stated that the Board did not want any backing on to
Cox's Lane from the parking lot. Ms . Wickham said that this
building would be primiarily sales _at this time . She stated
that presently the sales is taking place from the gas station
which Mr. Kaelin owns to the South of the site . The Parcels
are in -;:seperate .ownership, ;,and it was, noted that a setback
variance may be needed due to the width of the lot. The
Board noted that this should be discussed with the Building
Department. The Board questioned if there would be any further
subdivision and Ms . Wickham said that there would be no further
subdivision; and .the'°-dustless s'urfabe'in`the park ing_,_�7311 .be asphalt.
On: a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the site
plan of Daniel A. Kaelin for the construction of a building for
retail sales of lawnmower equipment to the Building Department
for certification.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Henry Lytle- Abigail Wickham, esq. was present for the Board' s
discussion on this proposal for 2 lots on 9 acres located at
Soundview Avenue,Sou thold. Upon the Board's first review of. this
Page 10 4/15/85
Henry Lyta6f...cont.
proposal , the tax map indicated that there existed a right-of-way
and another lot within the land that was not shown on the survey.
Upon research through the deeds the Board found that Henry Lytle
and wife had conveyed a lot to Henry Lytle along with the right-
of-way. The Board requested that this be deeded back to Henry
Lytle and wife so they would not be creating a thikd lot with
the proposed subdivision. Ms . Wickham indicated that she had
prepared a deed for this transfer, however, requested approval
prior to filing the document. The Board also requested
covenants and restrictions as to no further subdivision, however,
Ms . Wickham ddd not agreee to this as she felt her clients would
want the option for further subdivision. It was the consensus
of the Board to further review this and inspect the property
prior to any action .
Herbert Mandel- Mr. Garrett Strang, architect, was present for
the Board' s review of this proposal . He noted a correction on the
agenda, the proposal was located at Rocky Point Road not Stars
Road. This site plan was for the construction of two 2-family
apartments Mr. Strang has presented this to the Board for
their recommendation prior to filing for a. change of zone (property
is in a C zone) or a use variance . Mr. Strang indicated that
there was contiguous parcels whcih were also zoned C, which the
aplicant wished to merge to the site plan property for more
square footage . Mr. Strang also explained that under the
previous density requirement, 6 units were allowed with water
and sewer in an M. zone per acre . Therefore, this proposal
for 8 unit would only be 2 above the ordinance . The Board
questioned the applicant' s proposed rental price of $800 per
month. Mr. Mullen noted that several aspects of the proposal
could be eliminated, such as the garage, which would bring
the price down. Mr. Strang explained that it was the intention
with- the attached, frame construction, to have the garage fit
in. Mr. Latham was concerned that this would be a summer rental
and not benefitting the year round residencis . Mr. Strang
said that was not the idea at all, infact, the applicant was
willing to forego the C zone which permitted heavy uses , in this
residential area, to create apartments . David Emilita, Town
Planner, stated that a use variance would not be appropriate
in this situation and a change of zone was needed. It was the
consensus of the Board that they were not 2n favor of this proposal.
for two (2) two-family attached. residences . However, the Board
agreed that a residential use would be acceptable providing that
the density is in conformance�:;with the current zoning.
On a motion mad eby Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site
plan of Pudge Corp. located at Southold for the construction
of an adddtion on the existing builddng to be used for office,
plan dated January 15 , 1985 ; subejct to axone-year reviewer
This received certification from the Building Department.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Page 11 4/15/85
On a motion made by Mr. Edwards , seconded by Mr. MulleniIt was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board _approve the site
plan of the .Cutchogue Library for the construction of an addition
on the existing library, pplans dated November 28 , 1984 ; subject
to a one-year review>
This site plan also received approvals from the Board of Appeals
and certification from the Building Department.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards .
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site
plan of Strong' sMarineland (Survey for Delores Strong) for the
construction of an addition for boat storage located at
Mattituck, plans dated as amended Marcn 8, 1985 ; subject to
a one=ydar review. Plans have received certification from the
Building Department.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen,Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town PlanningBoaitd approve the site plan
for Southold Floor Covering for the. construction of a storage
building, plan dated January 15 , 1985 subject to receipt of a
letter indicating that a fence will be constructed on the northerly
property line as indicated on,the sketch which was submitted, on
March 22 , 1985 and a one-year review.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham,Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Ward.; seconded by mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site
plan for Larry and Violet Tuminello for the construction of an
addition to -tan existing building for an 80-seat restaurant, located
at Arshamomaque, plans dated March 12 , 1985 ; subject to a ones
year review. This plan received certification from the Building
Department.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion-�Made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr.Latham, it was.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare C.'n.stself(
lead lead agnecy with regard to the State Environmental Quality
Review Act for the minor subdivision of Mohring Enterprises ,
Page 12 4115/85
Inc. located at Mattituck, :'7
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham, the�,,,following
action was taken:
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental .Conservation Law
State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617 , Section -
617 . 10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is
hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for
the action described below has determined that the project will not
have a significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The minor subdivision of Mohring -Enterprises ,Inc. is four
lots on 15 .9. acres located at Mattituck, Tax Map No. 1000-122-3-11
The project has been determined not to have a significant
effect on the environment for the following reasons:"
An environmental assessment has been submitted which
indicated that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the. project
be implemented as planned.
Because there has been no correspondence from the New York
State Department -of Environmental Conservation in the :8Jlotted
time it is assumed that there are no comments or objections
by that agency. ;
The Suffolk County Health Department has no objection to our
.lead agency status . They have received an application and the
proposed project is in non-conformance with Article 6 due to
insufficient depth of test well. In addition, required test
hole inspections have not been done to determine subsoil
conditions .
The project will meet all the requirements of the Code
of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations .
Further information can be obtained by contacting Diane M-. Schultze,:
Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, New York
11971
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards.
Page 13 4/15/85
On a motion made by Mr. Edwards , seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept and refer to
the Town Board the bond estimate of $350, 000 for road improvements
within the major subddvision of Long Pond Estates , Section I ,
located at Southold.
Vote of the Board : Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On�:.a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board override the
Suffolk County Planning Commission' s resolution of denial with
regard to the Subdivision of Constance Klapper located at
Cutchogue, based onc:the :information submitted by the attorney
for the applicant.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made byMr. Mullen, .",seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town PlanninqT Board approve the minutes
of the regular meeting of December 17 , 1984 .
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Edwards , it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes
of the regular. -meeting of January 5 , 1985 .
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Board to set the following new proposals for field inspections:
1. Peconic Homes-4 lots on 45 acres off Sound Avenue,Laurel .
2 . Agnes McGunnigle-set-off of 11 .7 acres from 22 acres at Light-
house Road, Southold.
3 . Charles Simmons- 4 lots on 57 acres at Sound Avenue, Laurel
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Baord declare that
the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Supplemental Report
for the proposal of Nicholas Schick located at Orient is sufficient.
for review by all in a ected parties .
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Page 14 4/15/85
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr.Lathany it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the
following comments to the Zoning Board of Appeals regarding
the set-off application of James Periconi and Marion Cimini:
1 . It was noted that there are presently two dwellings on
the lot; upon field inspection, it appears that both are. occupied
however, one may be a seasonal home.
2 . This set-off would lesson the non conformity of the lot which
presently has two dwellings on it.
These comments are referred regarding the application for a
variance filed with the Board of Appeals .
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Edwards , seconded by Mr Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that. the Southold Town Planning Board refer the following
comments to the Zoning Board of Appeals regarding the set-off
application of Helen Conway located at Southold, following a
field inspection:
1 . It appears , upon review, that the parcel to be set-ofE
was single and has become merged`-.to the remaining land of Helen
Conway.
2 . It was noted that the surrounding lots in the area are
small (under the two-acre zoning) .
3 . With the 50 ' strip to the east, there is still access to
the back 6 . 0 acres .
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, refer the following
comments to the Zoning Board of Appeals regarding the minor
sbudivision of Howard L. Young and wife at Orient.
1 . Two of the three proposed parcels are less than the
80, 000 square foot minimum, however, it was noted that the
surrounding lots in the neighborhood are small .
2 . Consideration should be given to creating two conforming
lots rather than three as proposed.
3 . The Board questioned the 900 turn in the driveway.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Ward,.,_Edwar_ ds
Abstained: Latham
Page 15 4/15/85
On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Ward, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the
sketch map for the minor subdivision of Dorman, Townsend,
McKay, and Millis for 4 lots on 11 2/3 acres-located at Orient,
map:-idated October 16 , 1984 .
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
The Board also requested that the applicant request standards for
road improvement, pursuant to Section 280-a of Town Law. Also,
the Board requested covenants and restrictions as to no further
subdivision in perpetuity.
On a motion made by"Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was .
RESOLVED that they-Southold Town Planning Board override the
Suffolk County Planning Commission' s resolution regarding the
minor subdivision of Andrew Lettieri, located at East Marion.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seeconded by Mr: Ward, it was
RESOLVED that whereas , a forma] application for the approval
of a subdivision plat entitled "Andrew Lettieri" located at
East Marion was submitted tothe Planning Board on April 16 , 1984
and filing fee of $50 was paid on April 16 , 1984 , and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on ''.said subdivision application
and plat at the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on April l.-`. 1985
at 7 :30 p.m. , and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town
of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and application,
NOW, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the application for " Andrew_
Lettieri" for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by Frank
Bayles , and last dated October 17 , 1984 be;�apprbved and the
chairman be _authorized to endorse_aL roval on said subdivision
plat subject to the following condition to be completed within
six (6) months from the date of this resolution:
1 . Filing of covenants and restrictions with the County
Clerk stating that any further subdivision of Lot B will be
limited to Three (3) lots .
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion--;made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept and request
Page 16 4/15/85
compliance with Inspector John W. Davis ' ;report No. 432 regarding
the access road within the minor subdivision of James Dean located
at Matti-tuck.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept the minimum
requirement on the improvement of the right-of-way for issuance
of the building permit providing that all --im rovementsr, pursuant
to 280-a, are completed prior to the issuance of a certificate_
of occupancy for the access road within the subdivision of James
Dean located at Mattituck.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham,Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the. Southold Town Planning Board set May 6 , 1985 ,
at 7 :30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, as the time and place
for a regular meeting of the Planning Board.
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Oir:lowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward,Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set May 6 , 1985
at 7 :30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall , Main Road, Southold as
the time and place for a public hearing on the Question of
approval of the major subdivision of Blue Horizons , located .
Peconic .
Vote of theBoard: Ayes : Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, ".Ward, Edwards
On a motion made .by Mr. Edwards , seconded by Mr. Mullen it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set, -Monday,
May 6 , 1985 at 7 :45 p.m. ati-.the Southold Town Hall, Main Road,
Southold as the time and place for a public hearing on the
question. of approval of the minor subdd_vision of Briscoe Smith,
located at Fishers Ilsnad, Containing 4 . 15 acres .
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Edwards , seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approves the
use of Belgian Block for curbing in the subdivision of Sebastian' s
Page 17 4/15/85
Cove, located at Mattituck, as approved by the Superintendent
of Highways
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards
Being no further business to come before the Board, on a motion.
made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, and carried, the
meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
'-k OJA N- Rk"a-,'
Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
Southold Town Planning Board
e ett Orlowski, Jr. , . Chairman
RECEIVEt"`). AND FILED BY
THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
DATE 6/ 5/�� HOAR
t'rTk;T�C , Totnin of out