Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-05/22/1996 g7 oFFO(,YCO Albert J. Krupski, President J��� G Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President c y< 53095 Main Road Jim King W P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Garrell ® �� Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel ��j �a0 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MINUTES MAY 22 , 1996 PRESENT WERE: Albert J. Krupski, Jr. , President John Holzapfel, Vice-President Deter E. Wenczel, Member Martin H. Garrell, Member James King, .Member Jill Doherty, Clerk CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE NEXT FIELD INSPECTION: Wed. June 19, 1996 ? A.M. NEXT TRUSTEE BOARD MEETING: Thursday, June 27, 1996 7P.M. WORKSESSION: 6 :00 p.m. A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI and seconded by TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL to set the above meetings. ALL AYES. APPROVE MINUTES: Approve minutes of MARCH 27 , APRIL 24, 1996 Regular Meetings, and MARCH 13, 1996 special meeting. A motion was. made by TRUSTEE WENCZEL and seconded by TRUSTEE KING to approve the above minutes. ALL AYES. I . MONTHLY REPORT: The Trustees monthly report for APRIL 1996 : A check for 2,451. 44 was forwarded to the Supervisor' s Office for the General Fund. II. PUBLIC NOTICES: Public Notices are posted on the Town Clerk' s Bulletin Board for review. III. AMENDMENTS/WAIVERS/CHANGES: 1. Bruce Anderson on behalf of PEGGY HELLER AND ANNE WYDEN requests an amendment to permit #4489 to reduce the size of the house as noted on survey dated April 1, 1996 . Located South end of Majors Pond Road, Orient. SCTM #26-2-39 .1 . A motion was made by TRUSTEE GARRELL and seconded by TRUSTEE KING to approve the amendment. AYES: Garrell, King, Krupski, Wenczel. ABSTAIN: Holzapfel. 2 . J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of EUGENE & ANN BURGER requests an amendment to permit #1617 to remove platform and add three .6 ' X 16 ' Board of Trustees 2 May 22, 1996 fInats with pilings. Located 2515 Pine Tree Road, Cutchogue. SCTM #98-1-14. A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI and seconded by TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL to approve the above amendment. ALL AYES. 3 . En-Consultants on behalf of NICK ARONIADIS requests an amendment to #4476 to construct a 12 ' X 50 ' wood ramp over existing stone ramp, as stone ramp is too uneven. Located 1090 Latham Lane, Orient. SCTM #15-9-1. 6. A motion was made by TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL and seconded by TRUSTEE CARRELL to deny without prejudice due to the fact that the applicant started the project prior to permits granted. ALL AYES. Bay Constable will be directed to issue a violation. 4 . Richard Witzke on behalf of SILVANA CADEDDU requests an amendment to permit #4343 to install 15 'X 23 ' deck on top of existing ramp. Located 1380 Wiggins Lane, East Marion. SCTM #35-5123 . A motion was made by TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL and seconded by TRUSTEE GARRELL to deny without prejudice due to the fact that the applicant started the project prior to permits granted. ALL AYES. Bay Constable will be directed to issue a violation. 5 . Costello Marine on behalf of. ROBERT SCHISSEL requests an amendment to permit #4546 to add an 8 ' X 12 ' deck landward of the bulkhead. Located 710 West Shore. Road, Southold. SCTM #80-1-46 . A motion was made by TRUSTEE WENCZEL and seconded by TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL to deny without prejudice due to the fact that work was already done. ALL AYES. Bay Constable will be directed to issue violation. 6 . Costello Marine on behalf of LOUIS M. BACON request an amendment to Permit #4365 to add 4' X 4. 5' cantilever platform and 32" X 20 ' ramp to attach to existing float. Located Robins Island. SCTM #134-3-5 . A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI and seconded by TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL to approve the amendment. ALL AYES. 7 . Costello Marine on behalf of HELEN & ROBERT RUST request an amendment to add the following existing structures to the Grandfather Permit #4238 that was granted in 1993 for 104' bulkhead; 120' bulkhead, 5 1/2 X 50 ' walkway, 131' walkway with 13 ' X 32 ' deck, 8 ' X 24 ' float with a 3 ' X 16 ' ramp, 6 ' X 30' float with a 3 ' X 8' ramp, a 6 ' X 40 ' fixed dock with a 5' X 6 ' attached lower platform. Located Wunneweta Road, Nassau Point, Cutchogue. SCTM #111-14-34. A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI and seconded by TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL to approve the amendment. ALL AYES. 8 . Pat Moore on behalf of CRESCENT BEACH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION requests an amendment to permit .#3780 to add 4 ' X 681. dock with a 4 ' X 48 ' "T" , a 3 ' X 10 ' ramp, a 6 ' X 20 ' float, 7 piles on West side of dock forming 7 slips for small boats. Existing ramp and float will be used in new location. Located Maple. Lane, East Marion. SCTM #38 .1-1-22. After discussion with Mrs. Moore, the application for amendment; was withdrawn and a full application will be submitted. Board of Trustees 3 May 22 , 1996 9 . William Goggins on behalf of THOMAS TYREE request to change the name on Permit #9-1-89-55-7-3 from Richard and Patricia Snow to Thomas Tyree as Mr. Tyree is purchasing same. Located 1585 Long Creek Drive, Southold. SCTM #1000-55-7-3 . A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI and seconded by TRUSTEE WENCZEL. to approve change. ALL AYES. 10. Kevin McLaughlin on behalf of VINCENT MANAGO requests an amendment to permit #4578 to move decking and 8' X 10 ' storage shed to center of property as per drawing. Located 8225 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue. SCTM #118-4-10 . A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI and seconded by TRUSTEE KING to approve the amendment.. ALL AYES. 11 : JOHN J. SAMPIERI requests a Waiver to extend the deck by adding a 26 ' X 28 ' section. Located 1380 Bayberry Road, Cutchogue. SCTM #118-2-12. A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI and seconded by TRUSTEE WENCZEL to grant waiver with turf under deck to be removed and suggest that a non-turf buffer be placed behind bulkhead. ALL AYES. ' 12. John Blakely on behalf of SANDRA KIERSKY requests a waiver to construct a 15 ' X 15 ' deck attached existing dwelling. Located Rogers Road, Beixedon Estates, Southold. SCTM #66-2-35. A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI and seconded by TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL to grant a waiver with turf to be removed under deck. As per request of CAC, the Board will meet with applicant to discuss perennials planted in high marsh. ALL AYES. 13 . NASSAU POINT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION request a waiver to replace existing split rail fence with 2 to 3 foot boulders 5 to 6 ' apart to keep the vehicles off the beach. Located Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue. SCTM 104-8-8 .1. A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI and seconded by TRUSTEE KING to grant waiver. ALL AYES-. 14. EDWIN BERNHARDT requests an amendment to permit #2011 to add a 4' X 29 ' dock, a 4' X 14' ramp, a 6 ' X 32' float with pilings attached to existing dock, ramp and float. Located 500 Koke Drive, Southold. SCTM ##87-5-4. After discussion with applicant a motion was made by TRUSTEE. HOLZAPFEL and seconded by TRUSTEE WENCZEL to table the amendment. Applicant will submit. revised plans that reflect a smaller addition. 15. WILLIAM SCHENONE requests an amendment to permit #4511 to make the catwalk 4 ' wide from 3' wide. Located. Westphalia Road, Mattituck. SCTM #114-7-11. 3 . A motion was made by TRUSTEE. GARRELL and TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL to approve the amendment. _ALL AYES. 16 . Jack Foehrenbach on behalf of BLUE POINTS COMPANY request an. amendment to permit #4276 to place floating trays at the end of the existing dock. This area will encompass approx. a 30 ' X 64 ' area. Located foot of Love Lane, Mattituck. SCTM #140-1-23 . 1. A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI. and seconded by TRUSTEE KING to approve amendment subject to Bay Constables comments. ALL AYES. Board of Trustees 4 May 22, 1996 Applicant noted that they will give the Town 50 , 000. 00 1 to 2" oysters every year that trays are used. Spoke to bay constable the next day: Trays not to be more than 15 ' from edge of dock and not to interfere with navigation and suggest. that lights/ night markers be placed at the corners of trays. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS.: THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER THE WETLANDS ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. I HAVE AN AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION FROM THE SUFFOLK TIMES. PERTINENT CORRESPONDENCE MAY BE READ PRIOR TO ASKING FOR COMMENTS FROM THE. PUBLIC. PLEASE KEEP YOUR COMMENTS ORGANIZED AND BRIEF: FIVE ( 5) MINUTES OR LESS, IF POSSIBLE A motion was made by TRUSTEE GARRELL and seconded by TRUSTEE WENCZEL to go off regular agenda and go onto public hearings. All ayes. 7 : 52 P.M. - In the matter of Proper-T Permit Services on behalf of MICHAEL J. LEAHY requests a Wetland Permit to construct within 18" of existing functional bulkhead, 113 l.f. of bulkhead and place approx. 15 c.y. of backfill. Located 2200 Hobart Ave. , Southold SCTM #64-3-4. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who wishes to speak on behalf of this application? CAC comments are recommend approval with the condition that the non-turf buffer at the top edge of the bulkhead be elevated 6" higher than the ground surface to allow runoff to percolate into the ground. The Council also recommends that the bulkhead is not need. The bulkhead. can be removed and the area graded and stabilized with plantings. Is there any other comment in favor of or against the application? TRUSTEE GARRELL: I saw it. I would basically go with the CAC comments. I have no problem with it. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: They are coming up at least. 6" . They are coming up 8 to 10" . The existing grade should stay the same so it slopes. TRUSTEE GARRELL: Move to close the hearing. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: Second. ALL AYES. TRUSTEE GARRELL.: Move to approve the application of MICHAEL LEAHY with the stipulation that the grade remain the same to control runoff and that there be a 10 ' non-turf buffer on the inside of the bulkhead. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Second. ALL AYES. 7 : 53 P.M. - In -the -matter of En-Consultants. on behalf of ARMANDO & JACQUELINE GRASSI requests a Wetland Permit to remove 3 existing timber groins and construct 1 - 40 ' timber groin needed to prevent further loss of beach as per drawing dated 5/17/96. Located: 4510 Peconic Bay Blvd. , Laurel.. SCTM #128-4-21. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who wishes to speak in favor of the application? DIANE LA FEVIERRE: We received recently, a memo of the Army Corp. They requested us to revise the groin to show the low profile. We have done that. I have copies for you. I have also submitted revised plans showing the DEC recommendation that the groin be shifted 20 ' to the west. Board of Trustees 5 May 22, 1996 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI : Is it going to be the same angle as the neighbors groins. This still shows perpendicular to the water. The neighbors are at an angle. DIANE LA FEVIERRE: We can follow the neighbors. O.K. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI : Is there any other comment either in favor of or against? The original CAC comments are based on the March meeting. Do you want to look at the proposed? ALLAN CONNELL: I don' t want to hold things up. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: What it is, we agreed that a low profile groin identical to what the neighbors had. would fit into that groin field. ALLAN CONNELL: Our biggest concern is that when we where there, we didn' t see an erosion problem there. We didn' t see a major need for it. A low profile groin is much better than what was proposed. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Was there any thing here about pre-filling it. DIANE LA FEVIERRE: The Dept. of State wanted us to pre-fill it, but the DEC wouldn' t allow it. They gave us an admit no to filling waters below. apparent high water. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI : We won' t mention it then. Any other comment? Do I have a motion to close the hearing? TRUSTEE WENCZEL: So moved. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: I will make a motion to approve the amended application showing a low profile parallel to the neighbors. TRUSTEE KING: Second. ALL AYES. 7 : 56 P.M. - In the matter of Costello Marine on. behalf of STANLEY J. CIAPUTA requests a. Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit to install 200 ' of timber bulkhead to attach to neighbors proposed bulkheads east and west and backfill with clean fill from approved upland source. Located: 635 Soundview Ave. , Southold. SCTM #50-2-7 . TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: This is similar in nature to the next public hearing as they are adjacent. Is there any one here who would like to speak in favor of this application. JOHN COSTELLO: I just want to clarify that they are contiguous. They ' will be built in a line connected. On the point where it favors around from the northeasterly wind towards the west, it is proposed to add stone. I would like to reserve time if there is any objection to it. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI : Is there anyone else here who would like to speak in favor of this application? Anyone against the application? TRUSTEE GARRELL: CAC, comments?- TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Recommended disapproval, because there is no need shown. There is a letter from Dr. Robertiello: I am the property owner at 275 Soundview Ave. Extension. . .my neighbor is planning a large bulkhead at the properties of Arcus and Ciaputa. The properties are directly east of mine. I have been advised by informed sources that there is a strong possibility that the building of such a bulkhead may have an adverse effect on the erosion of my property and also effect my strip of breach. I have also been advised of my right to interfere with the proposed plans of if such is the case. I would appreciate the Board of Trustees looking into this matter and advising me how to proceed. Sincerely, Dr. Robtertiello. Allan? ALLAN CONNELL.: We went up there, I guess the Arcus property, first. point we would like to make is that there are no bulkheads in that area. We didn' t see any severe erosion in that area. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI : I will show you some pictures. Cp1 Board of Trustees 6 May 22 , 1996 fd` ALLAN CONNELL: We looked at the bluff face. It is stable. The whole bluff face is stable. There are large boulders on the beach dissipating energy. I think a bulkhead of this magnitude accelerate erosion. It is going to cause scouring. It is going to have effects on neighboring properties-. The CAC recommends that you disapprove. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI : Did you see this (picture) . We .went out on the first inspection we said basically the same thing you did. It is fairly stable. The second time we went out we took a look at things like this that is pretty convincing. Yes, there is substantial loss. ALLAN CONNELL: Look at the bluff face, it is stable. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: There is like a 6' elevation loss there.. ALLAN CONNELL: That doesn't mean you should build a structure just because there is a structure on the beach. If the bluff is stable what that bulkhead is going to do is going to protect that individual property but those around it will. suffer. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Those are our concerns. I think the Board will like to see someone besides. the Board to take a look at that. There are no structures out there. We will table this. JOHN COSTELLO: Number one Allan just admitted that there is only slight amount of toe erosion. Toe erosion. is what starts the whole cliff to eroded. That happens every where and any where. The simple fact to the matter is is to think that that property in the future is, not going to erode. . .small amount of scouring in any in severe storm conditions. That this first wave energy, the increased cost of placing the rocks is anticipated so that is does not scour out the neighboring properties. Let me tell you if nothing is done there the neighbors in severe storm conditions will have toe erosion. Whether there is anything there, including thi.s. property. These three parties wish to maintain there properties and as he says the cliff is stable up above. One way to maintain that is to keep the toe stable. That is the way it has been for hundreds of years. You can vegetate that cliff with native plants, they exist there now, only if you can maintain that toe. It is the condition that these people want. The other thing is the objection letter from the neighbor to west, because of the shape of the land, he is probably going to be eroded less than most of the parcels because of the locations. Further to the west of that there has been several locations that people have lost 10 or 15 ' in one storm. Those conditions have not occurred lately. These three people are trying to anticipate and maintain their property. As everybody is trying to do. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI.: We don' t agree that there is erosion there and the best way to stabilize the top of the bluff is from toe erosion. We just want another month to take a look at it and. to ask the some people in the State what they think about it, because there is no other structure in that area. We have been there twice and. we still want to go take a look at it again. It is not that we are saying no but we are not saying yes either. JOHN COSTELLO: You know what the weather conditions are, I can't forecast them and neither can you. It would be helpful that this can been done prior the hurricane season. I don' t know if there will be a hurricane. I don' t know if there will be a hurricane. If there is not, time is not a problem. If there is some severe erosion, to loose and exacerbate some of that stable cliff. TRUSTEE GARRELL: John don' t you get most. of the hammering in your Winter storms a long that beach? . 93 Board of Trustees 7 May 22, 1996 JOHN COSTELLO: You do get a wind switch on a hurricane. Hurricanes aren' t as bad as the Northeasterly storms.. Hurricanes -are mostly rain damage. TRUSTEE GARRELL: If you have a concern about toe erosion, you also have a concern on that cliff about the erosion right on the top. To me the top is. . .we suggested that someone should have a. look at that too. JOHN COSTELLO: When you are involved with something like that it starts at the toe. If you don't start at the toe, you are going to have much more severe cases like this. You look at places like this like the Montauk Lighthouse. ALLAN CONNELL.: I would agree with you on that. To stop erosion on the bluff you have to control toe erosion. But you need to look at the . history of the site. That site is very stable. Yes, I admitted that there was a little bit underneath one little area. There is no sloughing of the bluff face. This has been going on for years. To put bulkhead there just because it is added protection, does not make sense. Erosion on the coastal zone is a natural process. It is giving and taking of sand. This areas is obviously is not a giving area. It is stable. TRUSTEE GARRELL.: How long has that house been there? She said the original structure dated back. to around to 1815. Then it was bricked over. The structure on top was a very old structure. If that is there 180 years, how much activity can there be. That was a question in my mind too. JOHN COSTELLO: I can tell you how much. In the same direction there. . . I believe in 1978 when we had severe rain storms and coastal storms along that coast. At that time the previous owner, he approached us at that time. He had severe erosion, as did most of that area. All the way to Horton Points Light; Horton Points stairs were missing. Those conditions come, those conditions go—That should prevent someone from trying to protect- its property. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I will still make a motion to recess the hearing for one month. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Second.. ALL AYES. 7:56 P.M. - In the matter of Costello Marine on behalf of LUCIEN ARCAS. requests a Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit to install a total of 2001.+/- timber bulkhead in line with proposed bulkhead of Ciaputa ( 110' west of Ciaputa and 95 ' east of Ciaputa) , 14' return and a 16' return, armored with rock revetment, 300 c.y. of clean fill. Located Soundview Ave. , Southold. SCTM #50-2-6 & 8. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I will make a motion to recess this hearing for one month. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Second. ALL AYES. 8:10 P.M. - In the matter of J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of DR. THOMAS J. MC DONAGH requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 10' X 60 ' X 2 ' earthen berm which shall be fronted by a rock revetment consisting of 200-500 lb. rock placed 2' below grade of filter cloth. Berm shall then be planted with Rosa Rugosa 18" on center and a 3 ' X 30 ' catwalk, (elev. 3 1/2' over grade of marsh) a 3 ' X 12' ramp and a 6 ' X 20 ' float. Located: 765 West Cedar Beach Drive, Southold. SCTM #90-1-6. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak in favor of the application? Is ' there anyone here who would like to Board of Trustees 8 May 22 , 1996 speak against the application? CAC comments recommends approval with conditions all construction should be landward of the current stakes. Applicant should add beach grass to the plantings to stabilize the berm. CAC also suggest that to the applicant that the rock revetment is not necessary. I would tend to agree with all those things. We have been out to this property a number of times over the past years. I don' t think the rock is necessary in order to protect that. I think if the berm is placed where the stakes currently are.,_ they would offer some flood protection to the property. If it' is vegetated, I think that would be enough I don' t think the rocks: are necessary. John did ever meet the applicant on the site.? - TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Applicant, no. But it was very well staked out. My own impression is that everything that is staked out is up land. It has no intrusion at all into the marsh. It is at least 3 or 4' on a vertical distance. If he wants to put rocks in his back yard, that is all -he is doing. If he wants to put a berm- on top of that, fine. Our opinion just to mention to Glenn, we are. not sure that that is going to effect what he wants to do. The way it looks is that the water can still come around the neighbors. That is his decision, if he wants to put dirt and rocks in his back yard he can. GLENN JUST: To be perfectly honest with you it was not his intention at any time to put rock in part of the plan. It was demanded by DEC. If you recall two properties up, the same thing. We are not putting a retaining wall up and the DEC demanded that we put rock there. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: I have no problem with it. I would make a motion. . . TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is this survey accurate? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Precisely. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: Is it behind Cedar trees? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: No. It is 31' from the edge of the marsh. The marsh ends here, the stone starts here, and then. behind stone starts the berm. It is very close down below. Not up where we thought. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: O.K. Any other comments.? Motion to close the hearing.. TRUSTEE GARRELL: Second. ALL AYES. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: I will make a motion to approve the application of Thomas. McDonough. TRUSTEE KING: Second. ALL AYES. 8:15 .P.M. . - In the matter of Suffolk Environmental consulting, Inc. on behalf of. HAROLD HEPENSTEIL requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 4' X 88 ' raised catwalk, a 4' X 14' ramp and a 6' X 20' floating dock.fLocated-- 1055 Bungalow Lane, Mattituck. SCTM #123-3-14. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI : Is there here who would like to speak on behalf of the application? BRUCE ANDERSON: Bruce Anderson for Suffolk Environmental. Consulting. Last month I thought cleared a pretty complete. case.. I am certainly not going to go over that again. There where 3. or 4 issues that. came up during that which I thought where interesting. We showed you. exactly what the property owners rights whereto access navigable waters and the board being unsure of perhaps the conclusion. that I had reached brought it over to Laury Dowd who submitted a memo in the file. We retained our own attorney to take a closer look at that plus the memo of Laury Dowd and the thrust of that is that the two attorney' s actually agree, that they do have the right to wharf out. to navigability. It is not disputed by us that it is. your power to regulate docks. That is why .we are here for a permit. What Mr. Angle, Board of Trustees 9. May 22, 1996 our attorney, did is that he wrote me a memo that puts into perspective what Ms. Dowd' s position was and what my position was. I think that every one is in agreement that the applicant has the right. to do this. I will hand this up for the record. You should really take the time to read through this, because this not only effects this property put really any others that are, this is the. firs.t and will not be the last that you will be confronted with these issues. I think it will serve you well if you are really carefully evaluate what. the riparian rights of a property owner actually are. I think we are correct on. it. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Well, we don't know that because we didn't read this yet.. MR. ANDERSON: Let me read that into the record because we are going to ask if you agree with that. The letter starts, as. . .see attached letter. I think we have an agreement here. TRUSTEE 'KRUPSKI.: Who is we? MR'. ANDERSON: Meaning the two attorney' s. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: There is three. attorney' s. Essex, Hefter and Angel.. MR. ANDERSON: Well O.K. Mr. Angel of that firm and Ms. Dowd of the Town. There is a second area of dispute. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Getting back to that Bruce, that is part of the issue. All they did was chase there tale on all of those arguments. They never actually caught it. MR. ANDERSON: How do you mean. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: They never said what navigable water was. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Exactly. We all have the right to reach navigable waters acknowledged by the board.. Always has been. And acknowledged. by the adjacent owners. The Board has the right to regulate structures that are going to reach those navigable waters. We just right around and. we are back. in the same spot again. Actually we haven' t because in the aerial photo it shows you exactly where that channel is in relationship to the dock. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Your assumption is that the. channel is navigable water? MR. ANDERSON': That is correct. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: That is not necessarily true. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: You are limiting the channel to the area. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: You are limiting the channel to the water that is navigable. That is not true. There is a lot of other water that is navigable besides the channel. MR. ANDERSON: Given the fact that the boat to be moored at this dock is well within the size of the boats that are found in Deep Hole Creek, the conclusion has to be that. those boats are restricted to where they can go. The only place they can go is the channel. So therefore the channel for the boats. in Deep Hole must be navigable waters. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: So in other words you want to put your dock into the channel.? MR. ANDERSON: No. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: The point is that if you are not going -to put it in the channel then there is navigable water outside the channel. And -that is my point. MR. ANDERSON: The boat is here at the edge of the channel. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: But it is not in the channel and it is at navigable water. That is our position completely and entirely. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is that dock in the channel? '1b Board of Trustees 10 May 22, 1996 MR. ANDERSON: The dock goes up to the channel. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI : But is it in the channel? MR. ANDERSON: No it is not in the channel. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI : Is that still navigable? That is the whole thing from the attorney' s is that it doesn' t resolve anything. That is just meaningless.. MR. ANDERSON: In that case law where the exact same disputes came up that have been resolved where the court has told the board give the man a permit because that is where navigable water was. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: There are no specifics in the case. TRUSTEE GARRELL: Bruce it is a wonderful argument and it is very interesting to listen to the court cases, but I think your argument becomes mute unless the mouth of that creek gets dredges out this Summer. That is going to hinge on turn nesting and. the Fish and Wildlife Service. If Hepensteil has a boat in there now of the size that you describe, he ain' t getting it out. If he has a boat out side, he ain't getting it in. There is no sense in working your self up over a mute case right now. MR. ANDERSON: Are you telling me that you don' t think any of the boats can be able to get in. TRUSTEE GARRELL: No. TRUSTEE WENCZEL.: It is closed. TRUSTEE GARRELL: I have news for you, you didn' t hear the work session. It should over man. ` MR. ANDERSON: The fact of the matter is. that we are not proposing to dredge, we are proposing to dock to reach navigable waters. TRUSTEE GARRELL: What is navigable? 41 , 6' depth. We just got through with Cutchogue Harbor Marina. In. order to do what they want to do, they want to blow out to a 6' depth. What is going to happen when Hepensteil wants to bring in a party boat up into Deep Hole Creek. MR. ANDERSON: We haven' t proposed.. . . TRUSTEE GARRELL: We have problems here. MR. ANDERSON: We can't regulate on what if. We can only regulate what is proposed. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you. And on that note, lets move on. MR. ANDERSON: I have a couple of interesting things. that I want to point on. Number one, you sent your Bay Constables out and you have a report in front of you. I have a report as well. He is showing waters . to be a foot deeper then I show. Which I thought was improbable, but interesting. What is also interesting is he shows the edge of the canal exactly where the aerial photo does.. You can see that from looking at the distances.. There is no disagreement as to where that edge of the channel is. Because he is showing it a foot deeper what we will propose of •this point is that we shorten the dock 101 . That would bring us by my account somewhere around 17" of water. By the Bay Constables account more. like 3 ' of water. We are a little bit off. We are willing to split that difference, if we can solve this today. If we are not going to resolve this today, then I think we are going to stick to our guns. I have prepared revised surveys that show the 10 ' drop. I will ask that you will approve this today. I also understand. that there is a $3 .00 per sq. ft. fee? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Yes. MR. ANDERSON: Here is the fee. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We can' t take that at a public hearing. There is no approval. Board is reviewing file. Board of Trustees 11 May 22, 1996 TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: I am looking at 3 ' as navigable water. Would you agree to that? The Bay Constable has measured out 85 ' from. the tie line of the property. I did that on your. . . MR. ANDERSON: That is not from the tie line. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: The line going across the two property marks.. MR. ANDERSON: What the Bay Constable has done is he took the two existing post from the preexisting dock and he made his measurement from there. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Right. Then I took it from that straight line instead of trying to presume where those .two things are, the straight line behind that connecting the two tie marks, the property lines. Do you see the dotted line going across? . MR. ANDERSON: Yes. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: If you take that line on the Bay Constables. map, 3 ' being generous, is 851 . Then I go to your mark and I find out that 85 ' is in the middle of your float or a 3/4 of the way through your float.. I just want to find out what you are talking about. MR. ANDERSON: O.K. What we did was we took—this was reduce from 88 to 78 ' . It is taken off from this end of the dock. So this entire structure is move 10' in relative to the tie line. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: My point is this, here is 3 ' of water, measure that out, I get 85 ' . That would- be a reasonable end to the dock. Then I come over here and I measure this out and 85 ' is about 3/4 into. . . MR. ANDERSON: You. know what the problem is, I think you are say this is 85' here? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: No from this line to 3 ' mark is 851 . MR. ANDERSON: From this line here. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: From this line here to here is 851 , agreed? MR. ANDERSON: Yes. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: So we bring that over here which I thought you had sad that 3 ' and 85 ' turns out to be right here. About 41 , 5' shorter than what you are proposing. That is why I said. . . MR. ANDERSON: Here is the conflict, your constable has not located where these posts are. This is not a point of reference. Whether the post are this way or that. way, I can' t say. He is not referencing his line. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Sure he is. This is the wetland line and he split the distance between the two. He drew those little post. showing that is where they were. MR. ANDERSON: He doesn' t know where those post are. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: With in a 1' he does. MR. ANDERSON: He can't know. CLERK: He took from the existing post. Mr. ANDERSON: He can't plot them on a map. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: -But Bruce it is 51 . You can' t pick the mi.ddle. of 5 ' ? MR. ANDERSON: John, for all we know the posts could be out here. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: Where could they be? MR. ANDERSON: The could be in the water, they could be below the mean high water and within the marsh. I know they are within the marsh. I . can tell you that. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Well he said it is 20' to the edge -of the beach grass. This is what you showed as the beach grass. if we look at that, it is less then 20 ' . so if anything these polls are up further and these are in closer. I will agree with that Bruce, if that is what you are saying. !0 Board of Trustees 12 May 22, 1996 MR. ANDERSON: I took this an I overlaid it onto my survey. There is a coupie of important differences here. #1, the angle at which the dock leaves the property this way, is a different angle than he has got here. If you took them and overlaid them like that, you can seethe angle is different. He is coming out this way and the dock comes out this way. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: How far? Afoot? MR. ANDERSON: The point is John it is source of error. You have two sources of error here. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Your saying it is an error. I am saying it is only by this much. MR. ANDERSON: What I am saying is that you can' t say that. You have a source of error where these unplotted post are and you. have a source of error associated with the skew in which he- drew it. And what I would argue is that there is a source of error in the way he measured it, because he has a got a foot deeper then what I have. Which is inconceivable. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: To whom? MR. ANDERSON: Well., you have also heard testimony that my depths measurements over estimated the depths. The public has told you that. They say. it is much shallower than what I am showing you. You have two sources of error here.. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: l agree. I don' t believe they are major errors. MR. ANDERSON: We are proposing to set it back 101 . TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there any other comment? PAT MOORE.: Can we have a clarification please? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: What basically has happened is that the applicant is making a motion to move everything back 101 . The catwalk will be 10' shorter. PAT MOORE: So instead of 88' it will be 78 ' . TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Starting from the same spot. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: So it is 1.0 ' shorter. PAT MOORE: On the amendment it will reduce it. I am looking at the cross section. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: I the new survey it says that the proposed catwalk will be a 78' X 4' raised catwalk, the ramp will still be 4 ' X 14' and then the float will still be 6' - X 20' . So it is identical except that everything will be moved back 10' , landward. PAT MOORE: Was there ever a discussion, about the float being moved in a "T" shape so that it. would be less intrusive to the channel? Last month we raised an issue that the neighbors certainly recognize that there is no problem with having this structure, as long as it is reasonable in size. There was some discussion of reducing the size and possibly relocating the floating dock in such a way that it would reduce it further. Turning it in rather than leaving it out. Is that a possibility as well? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I think that by moving it back 10 ' it allows the applicant equal water depth on both sides for two boats as opposed if they left the catwalk at the original length and turned it, it would bring it landward. It wouldn't be equal water depth on either side of. the dock. By moving the whole structure back, they get equal water depth. PAT MOORE: So instead of the 98' that they had originally proposed it would reduce it down to 88' total. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: The catwalk was reduced by 10' so it pulls the ramp and float in straight back. Board of Trustees 13 May 22, 1996 TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Is it. a ,fixed ramp? MR. ANDERSON: It. has to be roller. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: They show it in the diagram as the ramp and the float together maximum distance. But that ramp is going to overlap the float 4 or 5 ' at least. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI : Any other comment by the Board? JUDGE ESCAROLE: I just have a question. Is the Board in entertaining this application excepting the argument. that a riparian owner has a right to run a dock out to navigable water. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Yes, I think we are. JUDGE ESCAROLE: Because than I would need a dock about 2001 . TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: We have con through this. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: This discussion takes place. on almost every dock application that we receive during the course of the year and there are many. There are very few dock applications that we get that we say granted. •This goes on and on and on for every application. JUDGE ESCAROLE: I know that. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Navigability is what is at stake here. It is patent lands and we own the bottom. We are the ones who will decide what is navigable. Obviously you get into a discussion of what size boat is appropriate for that water way. We ultimately will decide. You can apply for anything. JUDGE ESCAROLE: But when you talk about navigability there is a channel that runs to a point to about here and then it runs off up to here and runs along Bungalow here. This. whole area you get a good low tide and an off shore wind, the only thing left are the two little. rivulets. If you are talking about putting a dock in navigability, you are not talking about at high tide. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: That is precisely what I have been trying to say. JUDGE ESCAROLE: This is not navigable. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: Sometimes. JUDGE ESCAROLE: You said you couldn' t get a boat in there. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: Most of the time you can take a row boat in there, right? JUDGE ESCAROLE: I will watch, you row. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: I mean on that flat. JUDGE ESCAROLE.: No, not always. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: Most of the time. JUDGE ESCAROLE: Most of the time. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: It is navigable. JUDGE ESCAROLE: The other thing is, I have no objection to Mr. Hepensteil getting his permit, I just wonder where he is going to get the. boat in. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: •I don' t think he knows about that problem. JUDGE ESCAROLE: In fairness to the applicant he should know that it. may not make it. TRUSTEE. HOLZAPFEL: The creek is shoal over, he is saying. It .is effectively closed. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: I would just like to make one point on this and I have said it before. We all know that the tide goes up and down and sometimes you can go certain places and. navigate certain places, and certain times you can' t. I don' t this board feels that navigability is related to the fact that it has to be utilized all the time. Or when the wind blows out of the northwest in the middle of winter and blowing 40 or 50 knots, there is no water anywhere. That doesn't mean that that area is not navigable under normal situations. Board of Trustees 14 May 22, 1996 JUDGE ESCAROLE: The size of the dock proposed going to reach. out to the channel? TRUSTEE WENCZEL: No. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: You can take a look. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: Any other questions? Do I have a motion to close the hearing? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: So moved. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: Second. ALL AYES. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: I 'will make a motion that we approve the dock in the amended form being a 4' X 78' raised catwalk, 4' X 14' ramp and a 6' X 20 ' floating dock. TRUSTEE GARRELL: Second. ALL AYES. 8 :46 P.M_ - In the matter. of BERNARD FISHER requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 4' X 327' catwalk, 4' X 20 ' ramp and a 6' X 20' float all on own property to reach navigable water. Located New Suffolk Ave. , Mattituck. SCTM #114-12-4. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: The reason for the catwalk is to reach navigable waters. Is there anyone here to represent the applicant? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: He was here at the worksession. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Mr. Fieler sent. a. letter. I will read for the record. Dear Board members, the above mention application for the catwalk, dock and float borders my property to the west. It is my concern that my present access to James Creek by canoe is not restricted or eliminated. These water ways are very narrow with . little room to spare.. Any new construction permitted should be considerate of this limitation. Prospect of boat tied to the proposed dock would further restrict passage.. Before this application is approve I hope. these. matters are resolved. We are going to approve something that is 2 1/2. CAC comment, as narrow as possible and do away with the ramp and the float. ALLAN CONNELL: I should. be at least. as high as it is wide. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Any other comment? Make a motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: So moved. TRUSTEE GARRELL: Second. ALL AYES. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: A_ motion to approve the application for 2 1/2 X 327' catwalk, a .4.., - _ - _ - �. w, kid= " '�._ _ --' - _ g-amide. r:�..��Jy Iin a. :'O :# � .SE T..,... 7'yZS - '� r In the m t t e r of MARDIK & LOUISE DONIKYA13 requests a :Ietlanu. and Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a 100' wooden bulkhead with 2 returns at toe of bluff. Located: 54255 Route 48, Southold. SCTM #52-1-4. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: There was a revision today: Please note the previously submitted plans are revised as follows, the distance between the bulkhead and the face of the building is reduced to 45 1/2 ' . This relocating initially proposed bulkhead 4' to the south of the bottom of the bank. The height of. the bulkhead has increased to 8 ' above the beach. Please call if you should require any additional. information. There is stone armoring on here. Any comment? Anyone opposed? A motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE GARRELL.: Second. ALL AYES. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I will make a motion to approve the application with amended description which shows the structure at. the toe of the bluff �bl Hoard of Trustees 15 May 22, 1996 armored with stone, which I believe is going to consistent with DEC Permit. CAC suggested that the slope should be stabilized with beach grass. That. is certainly good idea. The slope should be vegetated. TRUSTEE KING: Seconded. ALL AYES. 8 : 54 P.M. - In the matter of ARNOLD NEUER requests a Wetland. Permit to clear 22' right of way for access to property owned by Mr. Neuer. Located: Mill Path Road, Southold. SCTM #56-4-16. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak in ` favor of the application? ARNOLD NEVER: I went to the property today and I saw the surveyor marks. I is approximately about a 300 ' run. When I went out there, I was shocked. Right in the middle of the road. that we used all the time was a staked. We did go over a couple . of feet.. Towards the back. we didn't. The bulldoze operator put trees in there. He was going to put them in back where I am or put 'them in the dumpster to clean up. I told Mr. Aurichio before, I am sorry the bull doze man went over . there. If we went the other way, I would have to take down big trees like that and I don' t want to do that. I told- Mr. Aurichio I will plant grass wherever he did it. I will clean up the property and take off the trees. I am very sorry I wasn't there when the bulldoze operator was there. Anyway, this morning I got a. letter from the DEC. They said they would like to see me. I called this morning and spoke to a Mrs. . . .and I told here the two names on top, I told here Mr. Aurichio had nothing to do with this. Any blame should be on my part. I told him if he wants to call her tomorrow and excuse himself, I am sure it would work out. I have an appointment the 20th of next month at 3 o' clock. They said it .should take an hour. I. loved to clean up the trees, but they said do. not. touch place until they speak to me. Unfortunately I made some errors. I am trying to redeem myself. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Would it make more sense for the Board to table. this until we talk to the DEC. I don' t say do this and they are going to say do that. MR. NEUER: I can' t do anything until next month ,any way. TRUSTEE GARRELL: Maybe we can get Mr. Aurichio' s comments? MR. AURICHIO: At this point and time, we still have to go to the DEC. I don' t know who has jurisdiction over who. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We both. do. We try and coordinate so somebody is not caught in the middle. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: We don't want to say plant here and. they say don' t touch that. MR. NEUER: You told be where it was and I went there and I was shocked. You can see the pebbles where he(the surveyor) didn't touch. We did go on his side. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I will make a motion to recess the public hearing until our next. months. meeting and. then we will have the information from the state.. To make sure we are on the page with them. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Second. ALL AYES. 9:00 P.M. - In the matter of ARNOLD NEUER requests. a. Wetland Permit to clear property of debris. and leave in natural state. Located 2475 Mill Path, Southold. SCTM #56-1-6. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We looked at this two months ago. I am going to make a motion to deny this permit. Which means that you have to leave it a natural state and there is no more disturbance of that property. MR. NEUER: I am happy. Board of Trustees 16 May 22, 1996 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI : I made a motion to deny that permit. I don' t know what the state is going to do. I will make a motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Second. ALL AYES. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I will make a motion to deny that. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Second. ALL AYES. 9: 05 P.M. - In the matter of JAMES DEERKOSKI requests a Wetland Permit to construct a single family dwelling approx. 75' from wetlands. Located 260 Deer Drive, Mattituck. SCTM 114-10-2. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: This is marginally jurisdictional. Is there anyone who would like to make a comment. CAC recommended approval if runoff is contained., haybales, dryweils, and no clearing within 75' of the wetlands. I think the house is 75' so we are going to have to give 10 or 20' around the house to work. The wetland line is inaccurate here. ALLAN CONNELL: I said at 50' , but everyone else said 75' . The plans show that they are not going to put anything by the edge of that house.. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Right.. When ever somebody puts something on the edge of the 751 , you have to go another 10' for the foundation. . . TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: The building envelope means the building. The clearing is whoever is running the bulldozer. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: That is why we. asked for an application. ALLAN CONNELL: I agree with you. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Why don't we say haybales at 601 . TRUSTEE KRUPSKI I would say 501 from their boundary line. Their property line. Their wetland. line is meaningless. 5.0' from the. property line gives them 15' to work with. Any other comment? Motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Second. ALL AYES. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I make a motion to approve the application provided there be a 50 ' no clearing buffer from the northern property line and that there be a continuous line of haybales in place at that point. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Second.. ALL AYES. *NOTE: Letter in file, applicant requests to withdraw the following application at this time: P.M. - In the matter of JOHN SPIRIDAKIS requests a Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit to construct approx. 30' retaining wall to attach to neighbors and access stairs. Located Soundview Ave. , Southold. SCTM #135-1-4. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: There will be no public hearing on this application. BRUCE MACDONALD explain situation on. his. part, gave board a copy of the deed showing ownership of property and requested a emergency permit to reconstruct bulkhead. across 30' right of way. After discussion TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI. made a motion to issue a storm damage permit. to replace the bulkhead as per DEC Permit and seconded by TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL. ALL AYES. 9 :20 P.M. - In the matter of John Geideman on behalf of JAMES MANNING requests a Wetland. Permit to replace 1 existing 110' groin. Located 1370 Jackson Street, New Suffolk. SCTM #117-10-10. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We will consolidate these two. Is there anyone who wants to comment on this? A motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Second. ALL AYES. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Motion to approve as amended. Board of Trustees 17 May 22, 1996 TRUSTEE GARRELL: Second. ALL AYES. P.M. - In the matter of. John Geideman on behalf of JOHN MANNING requests a Wetland Permit to replace 2 existing 1.10' groins. Located 1470 Jackson Street, New Suffolk. SCTM #117-10-11. 9: 22 P.M. - In the matter of J.M..O. Consulting on behalf of ROBERT & ELLEN WHITE requests a Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit to install 43+/-' of revetment, which shall consist of 1 -1 1/2 yard rock which shall be placed on filter fabric, and backfilled with 75+/- c.y. of soil and then planted with native vegetation. Located Penninsula Road, Fishers Island. SCTM #10-3-9. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Any comments? TRUSTEE WENCZEL: Motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE GARRELL: Second. ALL AYES.. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: I will make a motion to approve the application of Rober.t. White. TRUSTEE CARRELL: Second. ALL AYES. 7 : 26 P.M. - In the matter of. 'STEVE MALINOSKI requests a Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit to remove existing dock and place new dock in new location approx. 8' to east as follows: an 8' X 40' dock with adequate spacing for sunlight penetration attached to a 13 ' X 16 ' "L" with a 9 ' X 16' utility shed. Also to add a ramp leading to ( 3) 8 ' X 20 ' floats, straight out. Located Private Road off Oriental Ave. , on. Inner Bay of Great. Harbar, Fishers island. SCTM #10-11-3 . TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there any comment? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Motion to close the public hearing. TRUSTEE GARRELL.: Second.. ALL:= AYES. TRUSTEE GARRELL: Move to the approve the permit. to Steve Malinoski. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Second. ALL. AYES. V. RESOLUTIONS• 1. JOE POTTGEN requests a Grandfather Permit for approx. 100' bulkhead and to add a 4' X 4' platform and steps down to beach. Located 550 Blue Marlin Drive, Southold. SCTM #57-1-27 . A motion was made by TRUSTEE WENCZEL and seconded by TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL to .approve the grandfather permit. ALL AYES. VI. MOORINGS: 1. LARRY SEVERINI requests a. mooring in Broadwater Cove for a 25' Pro-line with 150b. mushroom. Access off rented property with owners permission. A motion was. made by TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI and seconded by TRUSTEE . HOLZAPFEL to approve. ALL AYES. 2. EDWARD CAVEN requests a mooring in Broadwater Cove for a 23 ' Macgragor with 1001b mushroom. Access: Mason Drive. A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI and seconded by TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL to approve. ALL AYES. Board of Trustees 18 May 22, 1996 BRLTNO SEMON requests a mooring #4 in Hallocks Bay for a 16 ' Columbian with a 50-75 lb mushroom. Mr. Semon is #1 on waiting list for moorings. A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI and seconded. by TRUSTEE GARRELL. to approve. ALL AYES. 4. EDWARD W. WORTH requests a mooring in Mud Creek for a 25 ' Sea Ox with 1001b mushroom. Access: Public, Little Road. A motion was made by TRUSTEE KRUPSKI' and seconded by TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL. to table for further review. ALL AYES. Meeting was adjourned 9:35 Respectfully Submitted by: Ill Doherty�,�51erk Board of Trustees.