Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-09/24/1997 J r og�FFO(�c Albert J. Krupski,President p� OG Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President �� �� 53095 Main Road Jim King,__ ® P.O. Box 1179 � _ Martin H. Garrell �� ® �� Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel �j�l ��O Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24 , 1997 PRESENT WERE: Albert. J. Krupski, Jr. , President John Holzapfel, Vice President Peter Wenczel, Trustee James King, Trustee Martin Garrell, Trustee Diane Herbert, Clerk CALL. MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE NEXT FIELD INSPECTION: WEDNESDAY OCTOBER� 22, 1997 at 12 NOON TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL moved to approve, TRUSTEE KING seconded. ALL. AYES NEXT TRUSTEE MEETING: WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 29, 1997 at 7: 00 p.m. TRUSTEE WENCZEL.: moved to approve, ' TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL seconded ALL AYES APPROVE MINUTES: Approve minutes of the July 30, 1997 and the August 27, 1997 Regular Meetings. TRUSTEE KING moved to approve TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL seconded. ALL AYES I. MONTHLY REPORT: The Trustees monthly report for August 1997: A check for $3,240. 80 was forwarded to the Supervisor' s Office for the General Fund. II . AMENDMENTS/WAIVERS/CHANGES: 1. Costello Marine on behalf of DOROTHY THOET requests an Amendment to Grandfather Permit to reconstruct in same footprint an existing boathouse. Located: 380 Great Peconic Bay Blvd. , Laurel. SCTM #145-2-3 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI moved to approve the. Amendment, TRUSTEE KING. seconded. ALL AYES 2. J.M.O. Consulting on behalf. of GINO SCARTOZZI requests an Amendment to Permit #4778 for a 6 ' X 40' float instead of a 6' X 201 . Located: 1080 Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck. SCTM #115-12-15 Beard of Trustees 2 Sex nber 24, 1997 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI moved to deny the request for an. Amendment, the. Board feels a 20' float is adequate for that area, TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL seconded. ALL AYES 3. J.M.O. Consulting on- behalf of ROYST.ON RIND requests a modification to. Amendment of Permit #3623 to construct a 4' X 16 ' extension onto the seward end of existing catwalk, constructed a min. of 4' above grade of marsh, relocate existing 4' X 16' ramp and 6' X 16' float and install an additional 6' X 16' float. Located: 1375 Meday Ave, Mattituck. SCTM #11.3-9-4 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI. moved to approve the Amendment,. TRUSTEE. HOLZAPFEL seconded. ALL AYES 4. J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of DR. PETRILLI requests a second and last extension to Permit. #4385 to construct a single family dwelling. Located: East End Road, Fishers Island. SCTM #4-5-18 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI moved to grant a one year extension,TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL seconded. ALL AYES 5. NANCY KARDWELL requests. a Waiver to construct a 250' X 10 ' walkway with 1.0 natural steps made out of landscape timbers. Located: 1100 Back Lane & Munn Lane, Orient. SCTM #17-2-15-. 4. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI moved to deny the waiver and reques.ted. & full application, TRUSTEE WENCZEL seconded. ALL. AYES 6. ROBERT ALCUS requests a Waiver to construct a 60' X 120' tennis court. Located: 1457 E. Cedar Beach Drive. Southold... SCTM# 92-1-2.1 TRUSTEE WENCZEL moved to deny the request for a waiver, TRUSTEE: HOLZAPFEL seconded. ALL- AYES 10. En-Consultants Inc. , on behalf of. THOMAS HUDGINS requests a. Transfer of Permit #128-2-12 from, Russell Ireland. to Thomas Hudgins to remove and replace, inkind/inpla.ce an existing 30' timber groin. Located: 5400 Peconic. Bay Blvd. , Laurel. SCTM #128-2-12 TRUSTEE KING moved to to approve the transfer, TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL seconded. ALL AYES TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Do I have a motion go off the regular agenda? TRUSTEE WENCZEL. moved to go off the regular. meeting, TRUSTEE. HOLZAPFEL. seconded. ALL. AYES III. PUBLIC NOTICES.: Public Notices are posted on the' Town Clerk' s Bulletin Board for for review. IV. HEARINGS.• THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING IN THE' MATTER OF THE' FOLLOWING: APPLICATIONS .FOR PEP14ITS UNDER THE WETLANDS ORDINANCE. OF THE. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. I HAVE AN AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION FRCK THE SUFFOLK TIMES. PERTINENT CORRESPONDENCE MAY- BR READ PRIOR TO- ASKING FOR COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLI.C. Board of Trustees 3 Sei -tuber 24, 1.997 PLEASE KEEP YOUR COMMENTS ORGANIZED AND BRIEF FIVE ( 5) MINUTES OR LESS, IF POSSIBLE. 1. En-Consultants Inc. , . on behalf of ROBERT PROFETA requests a Wetland. Permit to replace. within 1.8" approx. 90' of existing bulkhead, remove and replace inkind/inplace 2- 15' retur.ns. on either end, remove and replace inkind/inplace an. exis.ting 7' wide timber walk adjacent to bulkhead and. 5.0 c.y. of clean fill trucked in from upland source. Located: 1060 Little Peconic Bay Road, Cutchogue. SCTM #(11-14-16 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here- who would like to speak in favor or against the application? ROB HERMAN: En-Consultants on behalf of ROBERT PROFETA. The application is just simply to what we just read. DIANE, do I need to give you the affidavit from neighbors?CLERK DIANE.:. You can give it to.. me now. ROB HERMAN: The bulkhead will be replaced within 18" and the returns will be removed to replaced inkind/inplace and. approximately 50 cubic. yards of. clean. sand to_ be used as backfill and of 'course that. 7' wide walk will need to be. removed to replace an inkind/inplac.e. If the board has any other questions. I will. answer them.. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I took a look at. the site. This sticks out so far into the creek I 'm going to recommend. that it be replaced inkind/inplace. because. it is already out probably 10 or, 12' past the neighbors.. The neighbors. who are. unbulkheaded. and. I would, imagine it was originally your basic cut. and- fill.. operation they built therstructure and then dredged in front of it and used the backfill spoil. So I would recommend. that you replace. inkind/inplace it because you are starting to restrict it. The creek is very narrow here and its .all. title marsh around it. ROB HERMAN: That would- be the only concern that. I. would have with that too. I will. consider this: and. of course I would. check with the DEC too because there is 15' from the westerly return 5' to east. There may be concerns to remove and. replace if. we loose the backfill into the creek if that immediately carries over and potentially buries part of that marsh on either side. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI-: No it wouldn' t bury it on either side because you're replacing those returns inkind/inplace. on either side anyway. I mean you can see from the survey it' s sticking out. pretty dramatically. ROB HERMAN: I know what you' re saying. A1r.ight. I don't have a problem with that-. TRUSTEE. HOLZAPFEL.: What that also means is that you don' t need. a permit if you're going to replace inkind/inplace.. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: Is there any other comment? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL. There is already a. 7 or 8' wooden walkway. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI.: Do I have a motion to closing the hearing? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: So moved.. TRUSTEE WENCZEL:- Second TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: A1.1 in: favor. ALL. AYES TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: L' ll make a motion to approve the:. permit based- on an inki.nd/inplace replacement. Board of Trustees ( 4 Sef, _ nber 24, 1997 TRUSTEE KING: Second TRUSTEE KRUPSKI': All. in favor. ALL AYES 2. En-Consultants Inc. , on behalf of JOAN TECHET & DEBORAH. PENNEY requests a Wetland Permit to remove and relocate 8+/- westward, of. exitingg fixed dock consisting of. an 8' X 5' X 5.5' platform a 2.5' X 12' aluminum ramp,- a 5' X 22' float and 5- 8" pilings. Dock is being moved to 50% division line between subject properties as per stipulation of. settlement ordered by the Supreme Court, index. #16775. Located.: Sailors. Needle Lane Salt Lake. Village, Mattituck. SCTM #144.-5-26 & 1.44-5-11 TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI.: Anyone here who would like to speak. on behalf of the application? ROB HERMAN: En-Consul.tants. on behalf of JOAN TECHET- & DEBORAH. PENNEY. This the affidavit. Ill speak a little bit to you about the applicati.on. as the. board probably recognizes- it' s not a ordinary type of application. First of all the project is. located on a private boat landing off of James Creek in Salt Lake Village in Mattituck. As. read, the applica.tion. is basically to relocate a small dock consistent made up as. a 6. pile as a mooring pile. The purpose of the application is to satisfy stipulation of settlement between JOAN TECHET. &. DEBORAH PENNEY'. Basically the situati.on. i.s: that the PENNEY'S own the upland property with the waterfront and 500 of that waterfront is deeded as a right of may to JOAN TE.CHET and. so there is a 500 division marker along basically the. waterfront of the. PENNEY property where the. docks are being moved to. Atty. Hubert. is present for Ms. TECHET. He is present to answer any legal questions the board may or is likely to .have. I'm here basically to answer any environmental questions but. I will stay now and mention a couple of- things. There are basically none to address. The dock is currently extended off the. bulkhead. by approximately 26' into a 105' wide boat basin. and is: less than 25 a of the. waterways currently confuted. It does: not block navigation egress or basin.. Right. now the corner of the.: float that' s closest to the end. of the .basin where there are other small. boat. slips are currently 93 ' away from the end of that basin so the proposed slip would need approximately 85.' away from the end of that basin. I understand that there have been objections raised in the past regarding the size of some of the boats that have been moored at the dock at it' s. present location which may be a separate issue for the board. to consider, but. I restate that the proposed change in the physical. location of the dock. itself does not raise any new environmental or navigation issues.. The: fact. that I would add that the settlement stipulation. . . and. Diane had asked me to bring a copy of that and I, have. It first suggests that the applicant should. apply to the proper- agencies including The Southold Board of. Trustees to contribute the dock perpendicular to the bulkhead.. I had actually talked. with. both. MS. TECHET &. MS. PENNEY and. Ms. ,Techet' s attorney Hubert. Sullivan and actually talked them out of applying first for disfiguration because based. on. a side inspection- I. was afraid. that then the dock. would potentially become a navigational hazard if. it was swung from the angle straight out across.. So in. Board of Trustees 5 SeF aber 24, 1997 the interest of time and basic ally proper procedure I suggest- that the dock be kept at it' s current angle and just shifted. over 8' so that it remains in it's current condition. which is basically not being a navigational hazard. As. a final. note for the boards information, the New York Department of State of: State Personal Resources. Division has already issued their approval to project which allows the Corps of Engineers to issue: a letter of permission that was in response: to the. Corps... Public Notice for the letter of permission which. is an. authorization. they took over leadership for the work and nature. I have copies of letters from the Department of State. and The Corps and another copy of the stipulation.. TRUSTEE: KRUPSKI: One question. You mentioned. a dock facility some 88' off the community docks... ROB HERMAN: The measurement that I referred to, if you take. the corner you look at the drawing based on the survey. The corner that is closest to the back of that basin is about 93' away now.. Now that does not include whatever the width of the boat that's moored on that side is. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I.s there anyone else who would. like to speak in favor of or against the application? THOMAS MC DERMOTT: My name: is THOMAS MC DERMOTT'. I'm an Attorney at Law in Garden City. I represent MR.. EDWARD BUCKLEY who' s. here this evening along with his daughter SHEILA who is a property owner, in addition to a few other property owners along DENNIS BUCKLEY the son of EDWARD BUCKLEY' as well as ROSEMARY BUCKLEY' MC DERMOTT who are not in attendance but obviously have asked-me to represent their interest. TRUSTEE: KRUPSKI.: Property Owners. THOMAS MC DERMOTT: They are the adjacent owners to the PENNEY residence. First off with respect to. the proceeding here I respectfully suggest to the members of the Board that the necessary party that has been noti.ced. properly in this matter. and that is the. SALT LAKE. VILLAGE: associ.ation.. If I may just give you a little bit of history with respect. to.. . . . although it. may appear to be a very simple matter- as using. a floating: dock. 8' westward rather a torturous history that has brought us here this evening. Very briefly. . . back about 8 or 10 years ago there was an existing dock there that i.s "not the one that is presently there. . . and I believe the panel conducted- an on sight. inspection.... . . A dock that was. a different location. then where the one that is presently on the premises. That dock was removed by the TECHET'S. .father-in.-law' MR. RICHARD back about 1Q years ago which then. resulted in MISS PENNEY'S" locating or erecting and creating the present dock and. putting that in. the water. Apparently without the consent or without the knowledge- or without the approval of MR. RICHARD-IS and his children who are the property owners: there.. That act by her including the present dock caused litigation to ensue which. is presently pending a New York State. Supreme. Court. As I understand it was a stipulation of settlement very, very to close what the present stipulation.. of settlement contains. A stipulation that was entered into in 1995. That resolution of the then pending litigation was brought before the members of the Salt Lake Village. Property- Association Board of Trustees, 6 Se. amber 24, 1997 members at the yearly meeting in July of 196. Discussion was had. I was present. myself. I unfortunately don't have the notes. of the meeting. It was a discussion. with respect to the: removal of the dock to where the permit or the request or the ' . application is presently requested. There was: a majority of objection by the property owners raised. at that meeting which caused MR. TECHET and. his wife. JOAN. , MR. TECHET' by the way, was. the then president of the association as he still presently is president of the association. That matter was never voted upon. There was much objection to this... One of the: reasons. was there. is in fact five boat slips. that. run along the main. bulkhead. The, bulkhead being owned by the association. Those boat slips are of course for .convience and enjoyment of the property association and yet there are more applicants in 'a given year. They are. allotted on a yearly basis. If the.r.e are. more than five applicants then it' s done by lottery. If there are less than- five then of course anyone who makes an application can. get. one. The fact that those. slips are rented for $4.00.00 per year per slip which revenues. benefit the. ass.oc'iation is. the basis for, in my opinion at. least, suggests to the board that. the. association. should. have been a notif.ied. party' in respect to this pending application. It' s our contention that if the dock were allowed to be moved to the proposed location which the PENNEY boat that. is. presently owned by the applicant is a 32 footer. as. I believe that would cut off and cause the loss to- the association of two slips permanently 'causing the loss of two slips. and that certainly is. a. loss to a property interest and an economic interest. And needless. to say they should. be heard.. Beyond that the owners of the 21 members association., they, in the past, and some. of them in their own election or in their own judgement have rented their homes for a month or two. or the entire summer. ' They were one of the. recipient's of one of those. slips included. in the ability to have a boat in there. So there is a substantial economic interest for the owners of the property who may elect to rent their homes if., the slips are cut down from 5 to 3 as a result. of this. simple move. of 8' of a. dock. We' re talking about a substational economic interest here- and I don't believe they were individually noticed. Now maybe there' s no requirement with respect to these proceedings. I bring that to the attention of the board. And then lastly, yesterday I visited with. the General Counsel from the. Army. Corps of Engineers, a RI.TA FISHER.. And in reviewing the application that was filed with her office for a permit of the. activity. There is a statement. that is included along with the application that certainly may be construed as misleading and. I don' t' mean to say or sugges.t. it was: done, intentionally. There is retrench that the removal for the relocation of the: dock in feet is persuasion when order of the New State Supreme. Court as if the act by this. board. by the New York State Authorities. as. well as the Army Corps of Engineers. is monasterial. based. upon an order a direction from a New York State Supreme: Court and that simply is. not the case at all if one gives a. fair reading to the stipulation of settlement. As a matter of fact a stipulation quite clearly spells out that if the movement of the dock of 8' Board .of Trustees 7 . Ser nber 24, 1997 is not approved by those agencies that have the jurisdiction and. the authority to pass on, it then, the very highly contested litigation., goes. back before the same justice. And lastly, I think the chairman brought. out, and. I. certainly didn't cause any survey to be made or any engineering diagrams: to be- completed., but I' respectfully refer the. board. to section 3239 of: the town code which controls: the. mooring: and the. a:nchor.ing of boats.. And I believe it specifies clearly, that if, the. activity or a location of a mooring points 5.0' within the: loeati.on.. of another dock for a mooring facility, it would be a. violation. of the. very town code. I don' t know if that. has. been amended or. not and I don't know whether I'm reading- that properly or not... TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: You're not. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: It only applies to boats moored not boats. docked. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI.: If that were the case the association wouldn' t be able to moor their own boats within 50' of each other. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: You- couldn't put a boat right. next to each. other. Because that. would have to be 50' apart. What that refers to is a boat moored- in a creek. THOMAS MCDERMOTT': So width respect. to, I believe a lack of the necessary parties here., with the Salt Lake: Village Association, as well as. I could. certainly indicate. to the: board,. that there were several members- of the Association as well as property owners learning of this application process independently or privately, notified. MR. BUCKLEY of their objection but I don' t want to get into. who said what, I' ll. just make representation that if the record. were mor.e. fully.developed I'm quite confident. that a number if not a. majority of. 'the homeowners within the Salt Lake Village area, the majority would object to such a move for those reasons. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: Well just a bri.ef answer as far as the: notification.. Was this published in the newspapers:? CLERK DIANK: Yes. MRS. PENNEY: I'm Debra Penney. I didn't hear. the.. attorney''s name. The dock that is presently there has been inp:lace there. for over 10 years and I have the original. permits- for- that dock which were filed by MR. RICHARDS for both us so nothing has been changed within 10 years and it was approved and I had no problem with that at that .time. Also as to address the fact that two of these- slips. would be unavailable without_ me:: having a map. in front of me L' ll- try to explain this. One: of those: slips- ids my own personal property so it does not exist for the Salt Lake Village Association. It' s. the. one that.' s in. the first slip. is my bulkhead. on my end. of this property— And the second slip.. . . this whole summer MR. ROGERS- who is one of the only people- that uses the boat basin has his- boat- in the second slip this summer and has no problem. I've spoken to MR. ROGERS and. he: has- no negative. feelings what we are doing at all. Just. as you know there are three slips at. the south end. of this: basin that canno.t: be used at all because of Cedar Creek Beach, that's built up there so that definitely is a problem that we are dealing with at Salt Lake Village.. But what we want to do with the dock has no way of interfering with the first slip because it' s not theirs and. Board of Trustees 8 Se- ember 24, 1997 the second has been used this. .summer was not a problem. I 've spoken to MR. 'ROGERS. myself.. I was. also present. at the "Salt Lake Village meeting and there were. some meetings about this and at the first meeting everyone was. in. favor of this including MR. BUCKLEY.. At the second meeting his children became very irate and upset and got involved., and wanted another meeting. So they, rescheduled another meeting and they were the only people that. were against it. at the time. I have spoken to all the neighbors. no one has any objection to this. I 've approached. everybody ahead of time so there wouldn't. be a problem. But if. MR.. BUCKLEY has people coming to him complaining: I would like. to know specifically who they are.. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI.: Any other comment? MR. BUCKLEY': Gentlemen my name is MR. BUCKLEYY. I'm a property- owner Salt Lake. Village. This agreement between the TE.CHET.'S and PENNEY'S has been going back to probably 12 or 14 years, involving the people in the Salt Lake Village Association. I'd like to comment on. the remark. of the previous speaker. I spoke with ED ROGER last night who was out for a days visit and asked him if he was coming to the meeting tonight. And he said no., because he hadd. a prior commitment. He said what' s going on? I. said. there is a hearing on the removal of. the boat westerly 8' which I think interferes with the boat basin. He Said. ED I thought that issue was: dead. We had. a meeting JULY 4th 1996 in which 16 other home owners, MR. SALTZMAN, MRS. HERMAN, MISS ROSS. . . all objected to the boat being moved. 8-1/2' JULY 4th 1996.. The voluntary president of our association who volunteered to become .president is STEVE TECHET. When MR. TECHET: saw that 6 people objected to the move of the boat. he-said, "well. that will be it" . We wouldn' t proceed further because the Board- of Trustees would never allow this to take place. Nor interfering. with our boat basin owned. by the Village. L've given. the names to MISS PENNEY. She just heard me call. them out one by one. You men there have a letter from MR. STEVE. O'LEARY esquire, giving a. background about the boat and the imposition the move. of that . boat would- present a safety hazard to our children, like. my grandchildren., his grandchildren, who would use the boat. . . and that big 34' boat being moved westerly is a marine safety hazard jeopardizing perhaps a child or a college student if. the winds took that boat and drove it into the other boat. This clearly is. an impositi.on. put on the. Salt Lake Village: Association.. To settle' a feud, a family dispute that's been going on for. 8 years,. . . . I would. like to correct another impression when MR. RICHARDS put that boat basin. approximately around. 198.2 and. I got a letter from the ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS that they have no objection to. a 19' boat being applied_ to that floating dock.. I have no objection to. a 19' boat but when the TECHETS- went home they removed the floating dock and took it and put it in their garage. That following, fall and winter. MISS PENNEY and. a friend of hers rebuilt the dock. I don.' t know if .the permission was. granted and floated back into the space where. MR. RICHARDS had his dock. Now I don't know if a permit was. necessary to. reapply that boat which was the dock was hand built and put It-, back in. the water. 'The exact. specimens. or the measurements I don't think: Board of Trustees, 9 Uer &er 24, 1997 they' re exactly the same as they were when MR. RICHARDS had his dock. Gentlemen. I plead with. you to give serious attention of., moving this dock westerly. It'.s. a marine hazard... Potentially putting somebody in very serious accident position especially with the children. And children- run boats. High. school. boys 'and. girls run the boats.. So I've given the names: of the people who have objected.. No body knew about. this. MR. ROGERS says to me last. night., "I thought this was a dead issue:. Why are they proceeding with this"? I said, "I have no idea except two people want to settle their agreement at the expense- of 16 other. homeowners" . We had a lovely community there. All of a sudden. this. feud erupts and we, the homeowners-, are being requested to burden that responsibility to satisfy these two litigants at our expense. It's now fair. It' s not just. It's not safe for our children to boat with a condition like that 34' boat being approximately 30' away. . . . . .30' away from the boat slips.. Please give .this your serious attention and avoid a- potential. serious accident to. the children off. .Salt. Lake Village. Thank you for your attention- men. MR. KRUPSKI Excuse me. One .question. f.or you. Was that slip, MR. BUCKLEY, was that rented out? MR. BUCKLEY': No it. was not sir. I would like to direct the statement that that slip is completely owned. by the PENNEY. family. Part of that slip, the: pole I think, was moved two or three feet onto her property as she said, which she does not. own. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: I don't see how actually—she- might own the bulkhead but no one. . .. . we own the bottom in the- basin- TRUSTEE HOLZAPEEL: That-Is why I didn't understand how you. own. . . ." or she owns it. It' s ours. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: Would anyone else. like: to. speak? STEVR ZALEWSKI: Hi. I'm STEVE' ZALEWSKT.. I'm DEH' S husband and part of this. seems a little ridiculous: to me because: I walked over to MR.. ROGER'S house and. was looking. at a sprinkler for them and. mentioned what was going on.. He says, "well it sounds like a. good. thing tome" . These has. been. no problem with the . boat. MR. BUCKLEY dosen' t even. have a boat that he puts in the area and. has. never had a boat. There was only one boat in there this year for maybe a month. A couple of the slips are taken over by sand but we have a small boat parked in there and I have plenty of room to navigate it. We were at the meeting and everybody was notified and nobody- said. no they were not, everybody said it was okay with them. MR.. BUCKLEY: I take issue with the previous speaker. I. gave the names of the six. people at the JULY 4th 1996 meeting that TECHET ran as the president.. MRS. ROSS., MRS.. HERMAN, MR.. AND MRS., O'LEARY, MR. AND MRS. SALTZMAN', MR. NEWMAN and myself those names were interceded and we clearly stated that we objected to it. MR. TECHET' S comments were, if we have so many, objections he. will not pursue this before: the Trus_tees.... Gentlemen that. can be testified to by the individual. people. When this. meeting was. called here this evening I was the only one:. notified.. The association was not notified... I did have a_ boat. for the correction. of the previous speaker. Because of my age I gave it, up but I am going to buy a boat for my graduate. grandchildren. Board of Trustees 10 CC_ 24, 1997 and I don' t want to see a serious accident.. We have a potential dangerous condition with a 34' boat intruding and. trespassing on the ROW of the people who use the boat slip. It is a serious condition. I can. see something happening. I hope I'm wrong but. I did have- a boat.. The previous- speaker was: not around- when I had- my boat. He only moved in the last two years-or-so. But that float was originally removed. and newly constructed by MISS PENNEY and an associate of hers' and put in the. water. I ask. this question.. Should she be allowed to put. that boat back. in the water without a permit from the Board of. Trustees.? It' s not the original permit that was granted to ED. RICHARDS. and. his. boat.. I say that' s disgusting. Gentlemen please listen to my plea. We want to prevent a .serious accident. Thank. you. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI:. Thank. you... Would. anyone. else- like to address. - the board? HUBERT SULLIVAN: My name is HUBERT SULLIVAN. I'm an attorney and. I represent JOAN TECHET one. of. the co-applicants in this- proceeding. The stipulation' of second is not the court order. , The stipulation which reached some time ago and then. the parties. would to vile to petition this. thought approval. The case. was then put on the calendar of the. Supreme Court. it would reach trial this past summer. In a conference held in the Supreme Court it was decided that the. original. stipulation. should be adhered to by the parties and an application may for. this party and the other regulatory parties to approve the removal of the dock. I you look at the survey you' ll see- that there is a bulkhead running along this lot 9. Back in 1945 it was owned this lot by FRANK RICHARDS who was MISS TECHET`S grandfather. He then. sold. the property to a party named HUGALINDS who was MISS. PENNEY' S predecessor entitle... In that deed in 1945 there was a' clause reserving the easterly half of the bulkhead to FRANK RICHARDS and. also reserving easement of the:' easterly half. of the westerly half of .the dock to get to this particular reserve area. Now of course you couldn.'t do that today without Planning Board Approval but you could do it in 194.5 (to much. noise.) . At any _rate the dock was originally. at the half. way mark dividing the bulkhead. In 1956 I believe it- was En-Consultants who made an application on behalf of MR. ED RICHARDS who is MISS. TECHET'S father to move this dock. easterly from the division line presumably because. MR. RICHARD wanted a boating within his. waters taking. the. reserve half he. owned and that- dispute. was between MISS PENNEY AND MRS:. TECHET about who got the right to use it. Her fight. said. we have: exclusive use of it. MISS PENNEY said no. It was joint use-. We then, after haggling. the_ thing out we decided that the. best way 'to settle. this was. to move the. dock back to where it was. Now the stipulation, if. you read it, calls for an initial applicati_on. for a perpendicular dock.. On. a recommendation of MR HERMAN both parties agree that. the_ application will be for an. angular dock at the- 'halfway mark. Also the stipulation says the dock should be MRS:. TE.CHET'S. dock which was taken out of the water for the winter. but my client MRS. TECHET arranged with MRS. PENNEY that the application. would be for the present dock which belongs to MISS PENNEY. We agreed . to give .permanent. use of half of the dock. ,to MRS.. PENNEY' Board of Trustees 11 S -_ :ember 24, 1997 providing it was moved back to the original line. Now I presume that notice was given to all the parties who have properti.es. (to noisy) at this particular yacht basin. Now what the- standing of the Salt. Lake Village Association is., it' s not a (cannot make out. what MR.. HUBERT' is saying) . It. would seem that if. the individual' s got notice then they should- be here:.. I have nothing further to say. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.:. Could I ask. a question just based. on what you. said? When the dock is moved, it will still- overlap both. properties? You still have to use both properties to get to it? MR.. SULLIVAN: That' s. right. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: Okay. And. so the purpose: of. moving it? MR. SULLIVAN: Well the: purpose. of. moving it. is to allow MISS_ PENNEY. . . . . . . . . . . . . TRUSTEE. HOLZAPFEL:. Both. people have to agree to allow each other to go onto the dock.. MR. SULLIVAN: Yes. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: So if we leave it where it is both people can.. agree to let both peopl.e. onto the. dock? MR. SULLIVAN: Not in this present location.. TRUSTEE. WENCZEL: Why? MR. SULLIVAN: It' s our concern about the liability question.TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: How does that change: if it' s moved- over 8 ") MR. SULLIVAN. If the head of the dock is at the- half way division mark, and that would. lessen the liability if somebody should have an accident. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI:. Which is- after 10 years in. the. court paying. lawyers and judges and what not., it' s pretty pathetic reasoning. ' TRUSTEE GARRELL Yes. It' s an incredible situation.. I think what makes us so. . .we get all kinds of applications and you see them every night. You come here and. the folks come here.. . .and we get applicati.ons. to construct new docks and. put things in a creek but this is unusual. I. mean we never had. an application to simply move a perfectly good existing structure with pe.ople.. who. have apparently gotten together and made an appli.cation to. do so but seemlying can' t agree to share a per.f.ectly 'good dock that' s already there. It seems like a logical. person in. ED KOCH'S Peoples Court would look at this and say we got one or two solutions. Either send everybody back to the same box to- place . nice and be nice and agree on what you've got or else maybe we should take_ out. all, the docks= and. all the moorings. and start all over again in the basement and start with something new . . . . . . . . . MR. HUBERT: Myself and. MR. MC NUTLEY, who is not here. . . that., as you suggested.,. I suggested. why not do that. Just. leave. My, client says no, I'm not going to do. tha.t. but I wanted it moved back to the halfway mark under condi.tions. for permanent use. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: What our board is dealing with here, is' environmental affects and. also what was: brought up. by one of the. speakers vote of safety, navigational safety. As far as people, and. what they said at the meeting on July 4th and.. what the they didn' t say or who said what, that. really has. no bearing here because they're not here. As far as we're. concerned they were Board of Trustees. 12 Se_ _ amber 24, 1997 ' properly notified.. Does this Board ever recess. a hearing for a month if we think. .people haven.'t been properly notified sometimes? Okay. So that.' s. something we can consider here. We don't have the old file. It might be better if the. Board took a look at the old file. So the only issues- here- are environmental issues. not any others and naviga.ti.onal. i.ssues MR. HUBERT: I made a comment. on. MR. BUCKLEY.'S comments to be more directed to his length of the boat then they are to the dock. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: . Any other Board comments_?: Does_ the Board think its worth recessing: for a month to look at the old. file? TRUSTER WENZ.CEL.: Yea sure... ROB HERMAN: This particular cruestion to me is., if it' s. a concern that a boat would fly off a dock and crash. into the end of the basin that.' s. going to happen whether the dock is. where it is now or whether it' s moved 81 , so the question really is, is moving this dock 8 ' gonna. create any environmental impacts that are ad-versed or create: a navigational. hazard? And. the answer clearly, to vote, is no. Period. I mean I don' t understand what the further discuss:ion. would accomplish at this point. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI:: Board have any agreement on that.? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: I don.' t. think it' s that black and white.. I mean is there any reason to move the dock environmentally? So why don't we just -leave the dock where it is. so we don' t have to dig up all the bottom and. re-dig: more bottom over here. We leave everything where it is and. there is no environmental problem.. I don' t think that. there is only one solution... ROB HERMAN:. No. I didn.' t say that there was only one solution. Obviously people have been working toward a solution long before you or I have known about it.- I think of course the board knows you' re not the only agency who' s being obliged to.. Right now you have a dock that is supposed to be shared by two people.. One who has an easement. and. one who. owns- the- Wetland- property. And that dock right now is wholly in front of the- waterfront- property with the easement. And so when. we're approaching the. DEC. as. well, if the. dock is to be shared- it' s a dock that should be located at least in part on both properties. I think. that would. be the original intention to show that, because otherwise you'd have to write a covernant that would. run with the land for all future owners and perpetuity that who ever. owns the PENNEY resident could. have access. to the right of way and. that dock. TRUSTEE KRUPSKIc So if the proposal is, to disturb. the marine environment there, and. in. affect split the. dock on the property line, why don't you move the dock: over one foot so part of the dock would. be. on both properties.?- ROB HERMAN: The dock angles away from the end.. . . . . . TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI.: The dock itself is not. on the. applicant's . property. It' s on our property. ROB HERMAN: I don't get- your point. TRUSTER KRUPSKI:: You move the platform over a foot. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: Leave the dock. where it is. TRUSTEE- KRUPSKI:-: Any other comments? (Changed tape) . . . . . . . to move the platform,, we' ll, get rid, of the original- wording, we' ll move the: platform at a westerly. Board of Trustees 13 Sc-- -, ember 24, 1997 direction 2' and En-Consultants will. provide us. with a new drawing for a ramp., the float will be roughly in the same. location, therefore the: boat will be roughly in the same. . location, the platform and. ramp will be slightly to the west .to accommodate both properties line.. The platform itself. could be moved up 2 to 4' , the float and. the boat will. be same place.. All in favor? TRUSTEE. HOLZAPFEL.: S.econded., ALL. AYES.:. TRUSTEE: KRUPSKI': At this time we call for a brief three minute. recess. 3 . . Bruce Anderson on behalf: of BARBARA DEFINA. requests:, a Wetland. Permit. to construct an addition to a single family resident. to include a. 28.. 5' X 25' second. story addition and enclosure. of a 12' X 12' breeze way, with 2- 9' drywells to catch roof run-off. Located: 192 Willow Terrace Lane., Orient. SCTM #26-2-7.1 TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI:: Is there anyone here who would. like. to. speak in. favor of the application? BRUCE ANDERSON: I'm from SUFFOLK. ENVIRONMENTAL. CONSULTANTS for the application BARBARA DEFINA. I. have: a survey in front of me, you will note. (cannot make- out- what MR. ANDERSON' is saying) . We were out there on the property, and. you probably saw that the property was a disgrace.. This is. a two story house similarly situated with the .. . . . water. The status quote type application. in which the environmental approvement: by the drywells. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: Is there- anyone else who would like: to speak in favor of or against the application? Does- the board. have any comments? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: I' ll make a comment because I. looked at it and there is absolutely no problem with the project that they want- to do. It doesn't extend out further, it' s closing in areas and we should just move ahead on it. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: Thank you. TRUSTEE WENCZEL.: Do I have a motion to close the hearing? TRUSTEE: GARRELL.: So moved. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Seconded.. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor. ALL AYES TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: I' ll make a motion that we approve the application of BARBARA DEFINA. TRUSTEE KING: Seconded. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: A1.1 in favor. ALL AYES 4. John Geidman_ on- behalf: of LAURA CLEMPNER. requests a Wetland. Permit to raise existing. bulkhead 2.-5' above the beach. and. extend the existing bulkhead 36' along property line. wi.th. 15' return. Located 12.40 Inlet Lane, 450' north of Manhasset Ave. , Greenpor.t. SCTM #36-2-24 TRUSTEE: KRUPSKI:: Is there anyone here who would. like to: speak. on behalf of the applicant? LAURA CLEMPNER.: You. jus.t. read the. descripti.on and I. probably Board of Trustees 14 Suer-ember 24, 1997 .TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: I went out and looked at it and I 'm a littl.e concerned. on the extens_ion. part because it tends to go into the wetland itself. LAURA CLEMPNER: There was a man who . . . . . .and the extension. part is not in line with. what' s there now the original.. bulkhead, it comes back to the high part it rears those bushes that are there. TRUSTEE. HOLZAPFEL:. High marsh. bush is right smack in there. LAURA CLEMPNER: I don't like that. stuf:f.. there anyway, but it's behind that, it' s on the plan there. It doesn' t go with. the existing_ bulkhead.. It. doesn' t extend that. far. . . . . . . . TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: Your diagram on the application shows it' s straight across., it doesn't show across-. My recommendation was to follow the- deck back, but that isn' t what your application has. I' ll make. a motion that we table the application. . TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there any fill. involved here to raise the . bulkhead.? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: I' ll make a motion that we table the application. TRUSTEE WENCZEL.:. Seconded.. TRUSTER KRUPSKI: All. in favor.. ALL. AYES 5. Garrett. Strang on behalf. of. PAUL. & SUSAN POMERANTZ requests. a Wetland. Permit to construct a_ 28' X 22' wood. deck. to replace deck, a 16' X 40' wood platform to replace concrete platform, a 4' wide boardwalk with an 8 ' X 12' platform to go from. wood deck to existing catwalk measuring 4' X 60' , and a 3' X 4' ramp and a 4' X 6' float. Located: 12.05 Bayshore Drive., Greenport. SCTM #53-4-1 TRUSTEE: KRUPSKI.: Is there anyone here who would like to. speak on. behalf of the application? GARRETT STRANG: Yes I would. like to make a pres.entation. to answer any questions' the. board may have in respect to this application. My name is GARRETTTSTRANG; 1230 Traveller St. , Southold., N.Y. representing: property owners. One thing I would like to bring to the boards. attention is. the description is, I believe that the ramp does go down to the float (cannot hear, too much shuffling of papers) TRUSTER KRUPSKI: Any other comment? TRUSTEE- WENCZEL: This is the edge of the lawn, and this part over here, the deck by the house, that' s fine. they want to but a walkway, '12" above. grade. That' s fine_. This is. high. beach,. gravel beach., and my only guestion. was the. installation. of the sitting platform out here on the beach.. I don't believe the Board policy will. allow that.. I mentioned that to. Mr.. Strang, and he didn't seem to have: a- problem with that.. i suggest moving it up here on- the lawn at the edge of the beach. There.' s. no wetland. indicated_ here, i.t.' s a high gravel beach... GARRETT STRAND: The DEC felt the walkway from the deck to the catwalk. was a necessary structure from what- is there. currently the access to the catwalk. And by itself it' s not a real impact but it felt that is the type of fragmentation of` natural corridors along that beachway. And. if so, someone, like a neighbor decides. to do that. then it would be as. much. a negative impact. Hoard of Trustees 15 S, _ .ember 24, 1997 TRUSTEE WENCZEL.: Only, well, because of all the structure or because. of some environmental. . . . MR. STRANGE: The natural.. . . .the only need with respect. to that is the desire of the owner to have a. . . . .without having to come off the platform at the lower level to be able to get direct access to the existing catwalk and floating dock without. to traps across the lawn or across-- the beach. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI Is there any beach traffic there'? I.s. it gonna be to unusual to ask. the. appli.cant to put in a. step on either side. This is elevated 12" . To put a step on either side at. one point near the water? MR. STRANGE.: I don't think there would. be any objection to that.. They could go down there- presently where. i.t. would be. the transition made out. to the existing catwalk. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Any other comment? TRUSTEE. WENCZEL: L' ll make a motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL:. Seconded TRUSTEE KRUPSKI.: All in favor. ALL AYES. TRUSTEE WENCZEL.: I' ll make a motion to approve the application of GARRETT STRANG on behalf of PAUL AND SUSAN POMERANTZ'- to construct a 28' X 22' wood deck. to replace the. old deck 36' X 40' with platform and. replace: concrete- platform 4' wide. boardwalk with. an 8' X 12' platform. on the lawn not on the. beach to be moved from. the original drawings up on the lawn extending to the original catwalk. measur.ed 4' X 60' and your going to have to give us the rest of the dimensiions there. right? GARRET.T STRAN.G: Yes. I will. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Seconded- TRUSTEE'- KRUPSKI:. And the: approval will be based on a receiving the new plans. All in favor. ALL AYES 6. WILLIAM R. GALATI requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 60' low profile timber groin extending. from existing retaining wall and approx. 2' west of existing 85' high profile groin which .will be removed immediately- 'upon completion of new one.. Proposed groin will be the same. configuration as other replacement groins to east and west. This is a re-submission due to expiration of permit. Located.: 575 Waters Edge Way & Longview Lane, Southold. SCTM #89-5-61.2 TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI': Is there anyone. here who would like to speak in favor or against this. application? TRUSTEE. WENCZEL: I looked at. this particular_ application and I measured it out and. taped it out and only 56' of this groin is functional at this time.. I spoke. to the property owner at the. time. He was there when. I measured it. He wasn' t to happy about reducing. it.. I thought he would be here tonight., but he' s not. I told him: to be here. 56' from the bulkhead- is functional. TRUSTEE GARRELL.:. So 56' instead. of 6.0' ? TRUSTEE WENCZEL.: This is my recommendation.. The only other thing I would add is when. he moves it.,. . . . . . . . . . (There are problems with the tape) . TRUSTEE KRUPSK1.: Do I have a motion to close the hearing? Board of Trustees 16 Si- 'ember 24, 1997 Trustee WENCZEL.: So moved.. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Seconded TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in. favor. ALL.',AYES TRUSTEE.-WENCZEL: I' ll make,: a motion to approve the. application of WILLIAM R. GALATI. for. a Wetland. I Permit to construct a 56' low profile timber. groin extending from the retaining wall at. approximately 2' 1 to the west. of: the. remains_ of the existing 85' high profile groin which will be removed. immediately upon completion of the ,new one. TRUSTEE. HOLZAPFEL.: Seconded- TRUSTEE. KRUP.SKI: All in. favor. ALL J AYES. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: Can I just- bring up a. poin.t' DIANE? When you print up the applications. can. you. type. what we say on it? PETER and I were just going back through something from like 2 years ago its just a permit issued to and. ther.e is no description and we were wondering what it actually. was and it wasn't clear to us. Do you know what I'm saying. We were talking about that the other day. 7 . TIMOTHY & DENISE MC NALLY requests a Wetland. Permit for an. 18' X 20' existing deck.. Applicant- also. wishes to transfer Permit for a 3 ' X 44' dock. from. Cindy Moloney to Timothy McNally. Located: 905 & 945 Fleetwood Road, C.utchogue... SCTM: #137-4-23 TRUSTER KRUPSKI:. Is there anyone here who would like to speak in. favor of or against the application? I took a look. at it. The deck is there, the dock is. there. But I don' t see how we can do them both. under one operation.. CLERK. DIANE.: Why not? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI": If we can give them a permit for the deck and then transfer it. I think you have to give: them separate work for the 'dock to transfer it. Don't you? CLERK DIANE.: What we can. do is' Grandfather it. TRUSTEE_ kRUPSKI: Do I have a motion to close the hearing? TRUSTEE WENCZEL.: So moved. TRUSTEE' KRUPSKI: All in favor. ALL AYES TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: Alright I' ll make a motion to approve the Wetland Permit for 18' X 20' existing deck. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: Seconded TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All. in favor. ALL. AYES TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: By resolution. I' ll make a motion to approve- the transfer of the 3' X 44' dock from CINDY MOLONEY; & TIMOTHY' MCNALLY. TRUSTEE' HOLZAPFEL.:. Seconded.. TRUSTEE.- KRUPSKI All. in f avor.. ALL. AYES. 8 LEO OLSEN requests a Wetland. Permit to install a septic system, remove locust trees and replace with others, repair catwalk, repair retaining wall, replace a 20' non-turf. buffer along dock, remove top soil to and. fill with recycled concrete and top with stone or wooden walkway, install driveways: topped with stone:, grade. land, install. a 6' fence along. rear of. property, plant grass and- landscape, install. new water line from Board of Trustees 17 Sc-r-ember 24, 1997 main street to existing building. Located.: 3590 Main Road, Greenport. SCTM #35-4-28.12 TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: Anyone. here would like. to speak in favor of this application? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI.: Mr. Olsen the blacktop is that existing? MR. OLSEN: Yes.. TRUSTEE WENCZEL.: Do you have Health Dept. approval. on the skeptic system? MR.. OLSEN: Not-yet. TRUSTER HOLZAPFEL-: Generally speaking the. Heal.th. Dept. wants. 100 ' separation from the water. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: What' s the story with the floats? TRUSTER HOLZAPFFZ: There is one float on your survey and-. on the diagram you. just gave us there is two floats, and it looks; like twice as. long. MR.. OLSEN: The original application for the.. . . . . . .actually it is two floats and has always been. two floats I guess the one. drawing shows one... TRUSTER' HOLZAPFEL: The. survey dosen' t. show that. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI Do I have a: mo.ti.on to close: the hearing? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: So moved.. TRUSTEE WENCZEL:. Seconded TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in. favor.. ALL. AYES. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI.: I' ll make a motion to approve the. Wetland Permit for LEO OLSEN to remove locust trees., replace. with others, repair catwalk., repair retaining wall:, place. a. 20' non-turf buffer along dock.; remove: top: soil.. to and. fill with recycle_ concrete., -top with stone or wooden walkway, install driveway top with stone grade install- a. 6' high fence., plant. grass. and. landscape., install. new water lines from. main. street. to existing building. L'm going to: make this subject to before you can start this. though. subject to getting a dimensions for the catwalk. and getting us dimensions..of the retaining wall which means you are going to have to go and measure them. and put them on. your plans; that' s all. and then. you°- can start the work- TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI: All. in favor. ALL.. AYES. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I need. a moti.on, to return to the regular meeting. TRUSTEE WENCZEL:. So moved.. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Seconded TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor. ALL. AYES V. RESOLUTIONS 1. Board. to set. dates for Scallop Season. TRUSTER' HOLZAPFEL.: Approve Oct. 6 noncommercial and. commercial Oct. 2.0th and end March 31, 1998. TRUSTEE- WENCZEL.: Approved. ALL. AYES.. 2. Resolution. to accept ALLAN CONNELL.'S proposal- for water shed analysis- TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Approved. TRUSTEE WENCZEL.: Seconded. ALL. AYES Board of Trustees 18 S(-.-._ember 24, 1997 3. En-Consultants. Inc. on behalf of JANE ROSS & JON SCHRIBER requests a Grandfather Permit for 12.8' of bulkhead with a 23 ' return, and. add 24' to this return, and. a deck attached to the bulkhead. Located: 12.95 Old. Harbor Road,. New Suffolk. SCTD #117-3-10 TRUSTEE GARRELL.: Approved Grandfather and- amend- for return. TRUSTER WENCZEL: Seconded ALL AYES' 4. PAUL REI.LLY. requests a Grandfather. Permit for an existing 81' timber bulkhead... Located: 30.0 Knoll Circle, East Manion.. SCTM` #37-5-13 TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL.: Approved: to . inc.lude 45' return and. 10' return.. TRUSTEE GARRELL: Seconded_ ALL- AYES. 5. Docko Inc. , on behalf of FISHERS' ISLAND FERRY DISTRICT requests a Grandfather Permi.t. for all dolphins: in ferry district along the entrance channel and inside Silver Eel Cove.. This permit is requested for the replacement- and maintenance of damaged dolphins as needed., as per` Army Corps and DEC permits. Located.: Fishers. I.s.land_. SCTM #1.2-1-10 TRUSTER KRUPSKI:.. Approved.. TRUSTEE" KING: Seconded. ALL. AYES. 6. Melrose Marine. on behalf of. LESZEK GESIAK requests. a, Grandfather Permit for a. floating dock measuring 2- 4' X 19' floats and on. 8' X. 37 1/2' float with 4 piles that are- to- be' replaced. Located: 160.0 Sage Blvd.., Southold-. S.CTM. #53-5-11.2 TRUSTEE: GARRELL.:. Approved. TRUSTEE KING: Seconded,. ALT.- AYES. 7. HANS. & MARGRIT" KAESER. requests_ a. Grandfather Permit for approx. 11.0' of concrete seawall. Located: 57475 County Road 48, Southold. SCTM. #44-2-5 TRUSTEE WENCZEL: Approved. TRUSTEE- HOLZAPFEL.:. Seconded. ALL. AYES: VI. MOORINGS: 1. MICHAEL. D. TRUE requests a Duck Blind in Mill Creek. ACCESS: Public TRUSTEE GARRELL:. Approved.. TRUSTER KING.: Seconded,. ALL. AYES 2. DOLORIS ULLMANN' r.equests_ a mooring in. Corey Creek off Association Beach.. (Enclos.ed. is letter of approval.) , for. a 7 1/2' dinghy. TRUSTEE" KRUPSKI': Table TRUSTEE GARRELL.: Seconded.. ALL.�AYES 3 . BOB GAMMON TRUSTEE: GARRELL:. Approved. TRUSTEE. KING: Seconded. TRUSTEE. KRUPSKI.: Abstained ALL. AYES. Board of Trustees 19 Si _ ember. 24, 1997 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: To Adjourn - 10 P.M. RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK D TE Town Clerk, Town of Southold