Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-62.-3-22.1 R�i• . ♦ off, M.' a f +aaad ' � � ' -- � �ltlltuutuuiunuuu � � I illlll �= •� s.aJ 4 d s d I� t 1- 1 � � y�,• t i m. ° '�.a�r -a,ui a 'L�- .W��awt - - �• r �. ♦ �. - •w.. r Al • jr ;1T y ���I�•�� y � .�r 4 •ram ;� .' ,r �,..`�,c ?N•��' _+�� . low, a An PIK Ados— , e 3 Z it '= �r� •01► r•s r.. , -J �� . , ✓«rpm Y a '7'" or"y e , "+ ►��, ' II �' ; v VMYr 11/97-J. Sanford !' •s- ..'ate♦ .�'-j_ .� `. • �-i y.+au �S _ `. - .....��.�w�: -. _ _ %:.:.•+' ••=~x ems.s. -.- �� •• .... �,- _ - - •'•'�:.'- '_S�— __ram .- - ��r:�• � w'�,Y/ �. .._ .. - - A -:�- r'�'�r.. �R�'�.f}+ i:.•.-fir.. ', »L'a:::*...`�;� or bA �rli•' �1�,�w�•-.!Imo. r Y ' ter' -/�� .r .�.,,,. .. '� �,� �� • r Lr j ""•" +tea,..... �- "T w.. .. • •!ti J is - __ - .`irk �••���„{y �� _ _� - s t �T '■.` ..9' 7�1 Gt�a •yr] �!� � ' 1 �� �' �,��',a � , «- _-- AIP Jill 'tlr - - . IAs I I AD ^' vi sit- -_ir2 '� "fix �'C•'�!►� ' ! ` ems; .a r I I I , I • • • / , I , • 0-;. �t r in *• As . AS • • • MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD Y a .............. -- -- HAMLET BUSINESS r DISTRICT ,�► ;w CAppLYN A.ZENK ATTORNEY AT LAW 121 PONQUOGUE AVENUE - " HAVO M BAYS,NY 11"6 t Federalist Inn & Restaurant yh A Converted Greek Revival Home (Flower Shop) tea, r µ - _ Converted Greek Revival Home _ . .<. (Prof. Building) 9 e i k R' �M ■.a■ ` own ;_ ozy Family Style Restaurant 11/97--J. Sanford PA!. A , MP r li w%bl AdPL- : ?r,�•'.ram.., r � - �i �A 1 I I I I I ' , , - I I • 14 �' � ~► i, `�\ �, v": � it -� - . .rx-:•3'�„�,},- •�.-,. ,ems ,�-,.; r,�..' `"� '-� ` �ski"_�,."�`• �; �i�+��i 1P,�s i Of �. . + K_a " - I ► I I I � a a 4 ' } it a a Ai f'R'4 ��s'@. �� ✓d 71 1 F _ ■urn■ a I � � • a l V4 i a • • / ' h I �I �IM1 l 1 _ 1 rj OF Ric L()NIF !A ,, d !f w -Ali ,+rf - .. ` ice• 46 • •mow".FS��•1CF .�•'''.�b: v� '^ IIy'.. }.�_ ' �•+ w.t' ti s_ i I I r I i / • dr s , - ; . I yy CLEANS .. w MP sq? I n I ., •'w 4� < ��+. ��a�•,. �4M�. i� a �A'J ate. � Y ! '( � � � 1 n '9if4 • .P o r r •�k: dr I I '• f • 7 • 1 If Wr++ ," � Eagle . � N I TULLE, •c - •� � 'ram . ,.w. or • d / a dw 'r. O lo on— •r��r•�s. f ' f f 11 f i l • MULLEN MOTORS CAR DEALERSHIP CO, TTA GE PLA CE t► T- 1ic GENERAL BUSINESS Embedded in RESIDENTIAL., R.40 II I . III I I� '�i�^HMI IJy Repair Activity in Street SCTM# 1000-62-3- 19, N--►S 7/97--M . Sanford CAROLYN A.ZENK ATTORNEY AT LAW 121 POIdOWME AVENUE HAMPTON BAYS,W 11946 ,ram 7AL :. y :. Car lot & Storage Bay with - Evergreen "Buffer" - � SCTM# 1000-62-3- 19, W--►NE 11/97--M . Sanford ti . w Car lot with Evergreen "Buffer" SCTM# 1000-62-3- 19, W--►SE 11/97--M . Sanford 12/97--M . Sanford Chainlink fence w/ Hemlock "Buffer `r` SCTM# 1000-62-3- 19, E--►W MAIN ROAD EXAMPLE OF USE INTENSIVE GENERAL BUSINESS 1 I + illi 11 ii li In sill�I, y Ihi II L,, I ' I lil�lil L II�r L I. I I IG� 4 11 l(I CAROLYN A.ZENK aF ATTORNEY AT LAW ^� 121 PONOUOGUE AVENUE N HAMPTON BAYS,MY 11946 .. ...^. .�r •^, 'k,,,,icy. 'i 1 }l'.'� 1 � • • �1�- All e i dk- Car Dealership--Riverhead I� ^ r. INS 11�r Ilb 2 Story Warehouse/Storage Riverhead WIN r I IIII��'�'iil�I��hII III N I I II II 'I III+ Y f y — — AM r +•a .r, f ^ f ti� Car Wash--Riverhead _ _. Gas Station/Convenience Store } --- - Mattituck �r. a. t 7 t 1 Y. 1 7- 11 Convenience Store Southold 12/97--1. Sanford ord MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD ExW2A-V CaA .i ATTORNEY 121 PONQUOGUE AVENUE HAMPTON SAYS HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICT is (. F i •- _ •�Fw I Car Carrier in our Pedestrian Hamlet • • • MULLEN MOTOR CAR CARRIERS on Cottage Place Korn Rd & Locust Lane 13}i CP B GENERAL BUSINESS Embedded in RESIDENTIAL R-40 r "�F�I 77 L I' I I � ; a ' a Blind & unsafe dri ve wa exit on Cottage 9130197--D. Liss C 9 Car carrier unloadin on Gotta a Place 9 j 71 12/2/97---D. Liss .del jat 'L Traffic detouring into on-coming lane on Cottage 9/30/97--D. Liss a poi olpeu r i �. i ,: .L'll ypq. "i I��II��Pil l`ilj II �i;�i r:' ul u .. Car Carrier on Korn Road making way to Locust Lane 8/5I97---D. Sherman I b I lujli: I h�l i t li i�l q� a l' i i�N6i 0 CAEOLYN A.ZEN K 1�NN •• ATTORNEY AT LAW _ 121 PONQUOGUE AVENUE --. tiA1AP'TON BAYS.NY 11946 _ , V —t 'O, .. � S:Itltl��'pp�IfIMFAiw... car carrier on Locust Lane Swinging onto Rte. 25 4/22I98--M. Sanford MULLEN MOTORS CAR DEALERSHIP Southside., Rte. 25A GIROLVN A.ZENK ATTORNEY AT LAW 121 PONOW6UE AVENUE ►NMpTQN BAYS.M'11908 GENERAL BUSINESS Embedded in HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICT Car Lot with Halogen Flood Lights, 11:45 pm SCTM# 1000-62-3- 10.3 & 11, NE--►W 1/8/98-- J. Sanford F LOCUST LANE, SOUTHOLD r CAROLYN A.ZENK ATTORNEY AT LAW y 121 PONGLIOME AVENUE HAMPTON BAYS„NY 1194fi RRESIDENTIAL, SCTM# 100o-62-3-24. 1 E--► W kl i •; �� ti, 'y,".� i Fry , I >1� '� •� x J" -� �. � ,aryl. :..„,�' W' ' 44 I,: � �•' ,. ,"< �r, ,�'1 ;t fl9j � + r �yy, .- f � . . " 1 t ' !" F. . y ' yr �c c r,, .•� r . I : ^r r L Majestic Trees & Woodland Cut & Bulldozed for Car Lot SCTM# 1000-62-3-24. 11 7/16/97---J. Sanford D P8 NOV 2 6 1999 Locust Lane Southold, NY 11971 Southold Town November 26, 1999 Planrting Board . Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Reexamination of Southold Town Planning Board's recommendation of proposed Mullen Motors downzone in context of Town's Comprehensive Plan To Ben Orlowski & Valerie Scopaz & Planning Board Members: We are glad that the Planning Board recommendation has been sent back to be revised IN THE CONTEXT OF OUR TOWN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Mullen Motors is one of the most misplaced businesses in the whole of Southold. It is turning this portion of our hamlet into a trucking and industrial center, replete with noise, traffic congestion, glaring halogen lights, chain link fences, and suburban bubble window architecture. Mullen Motors is destroying our town's unique historic identity. In addition, the destruction of Colonial Corners is not only an architectural loss to our town history but a devastation to the whole area. A CAR DEALERSHIP SHOULD NOT BE THE CENTERPIECE OF AN HISTORIC VILLAGE -- or any village for that matter. Like most people, our homes are our principle investment. To allow the Mullen Motors operation to systematically devalue and destroy our properties when there are other viable options is totally unnecessary and unfair.* Our homes are much more than financial investments. They are the center of our lives. There is an unspoken sanctity and sacredness to be observed about home and family that should not be disrespectfully passed over -- certainly not for a Car Dealership. I hope the Town Board noticed that at both hearings, neither the Mullens nor those in support of this downzone application -- businessmen, Mullen employees,customers (family men themselves) -- showed any concern for the families whose properties and living conditions are so adversely affected by this operation. Without shame or embarrassment they all came forward to champion the Mullen Motors proposal to put a noisy, dirty, car service/repair operation right next to homes and families. Their only concern was business -- and their cars. It is a town disgrace. One of the most vocal Mullen Motors supporters, a Nassau Point businessman /customer was in fact opposed to a B & B (permitted in residential zones) in HIS own community. The contradiction in this type of thinking is most troubling. One I hope you take note of. Our objections to a General Business expanding into OUR residential community are legitimate and well grounded. It is a well known fact that the Harbor Lights community in Southold was successful in defeating commercial encroachment into their community by stopping a proposed B&B. We believe our community deserves the same consideration for the even greater commercial intrusion of a car dealership. There is no benefit, whatsoever, to the town, hamlet or surrounding neighborhood to grant Mullen Motors additional Main Road frontage in our hamlet, destroy Colonial Corners or to industrialize this area of town. No Comprehensive Town Plan would sanction this and area residents anticipate that these evident fundamental concepts will be incorporated into your final recommendation. Thank you for your time and consideration. Yours truly, c)-X-OL-� yd o_,__� Jean Sanford *Lucus Ford has been located most appropriately and considerately --most of all for their customers' convenience but also for the safety and well-being of the community. cc: Town Board Town Clerk Zoning Code, Article I, General Provisions Our concern is entirely with our rights as citizens and property owners. The General Provisions of our Zoning Ordinance protects these rights. It's fundamental purpose is to protect and promote "the public health; safety and welfare" and includes the following: 100-10 Purposes c...privacy for families d...prevention and reduction of traffic congestion e...maximum protection of residential areas g...enhancement for the appearance of the Town of Southold 100-11 Conflicts A. "Where a provision ...conflicts with...any other provision...the provision or requirement which is more restrictive or which establishes the higher standard shall govern." The higher standard of a residential neighborhood should come before that of a commercial car dealership. i P� o��g�FFO�,�co ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE h`1` Gym Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK o= 1 P.O.Box 1179 ti 2 Southold,New York 11971 REGISTRAR,OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER Fax(516) 765-6145 MANAGEMENTRECORDS FORMATION OFF CER ti'�lo.( � ���� Telephone (516) 765-1800 FREEDOM O OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 30, 1999 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is change of zone petition of. Richard F. Mullen, III and William Mullen which has been set for a public hearing at 8:20 P.M., on Tuesday, October 12, 1999. Please prepare an official report defining the Planning Board's recommendations with regard to this proposed change of zone and forward same to me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Eliza eth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk Attachments I - O��S�FFO(,�co ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE �`Z` G�fi� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK coP.O. Box 1179 co = Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS V. MARRIAGE OFFICER O Fax(516) 765-6145 MANAGEMENTRECORDS y��•� � �aO� Telephone (516) 765-1800 FREEDOM O FORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD HELD ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1999: RESOLVED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold that the Town Board will hold a public hearing on October 12, 1999 at 8_20 P.M. at the Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York on the question of an amendment to the zoning map on petition from Richard F. Mullen III and William Mullen for the parcels identified as SCTM# 1000-62-03-22.1, and SCTM#100.0-62-03-24.1 . The proposed zone change for the parcel identified as SCTM #1000-62-03-22.1 is from Hamlet Business (HB) to General Business (B) and the proposed zone change for the parcel identified as SCTM# 1000-62-03-24.1 is Low-Density Residential (R-40)to General Business (B); be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold that this petition for an amendment to zoning map be referred to the Town of Southold Planning Department and the Suffolk County Planning Department for review and recommendations. 1rizXabett A. Neville Southold Town Clerk September 28, 1999 r RECEIVED PETITION NO. glee, JUN 5 1997 PETITION Southold Town Clerk STATE OF NEW YORK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF RICHARD F. MULLEN III and WILLIAM fl. MULLEN FOR A CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. . .. . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: Richard . Mullen III and 1. , We, William H. Mullen residing at r/o Mn11 n mntnrc p_n_Rnx 14ng Petitioner Southold, NY 11971 Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned,neat ths r of certain real property are contract vendees situated at Main Road, Southold, NY and more particularly bounded and described as follows: Property is presently owned by Albert W. Albertson, Jr. and Donald B. Katz. SCTM Ps 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 & 024.001. See attached Schedule A for metes and bounds description of premises. 2. We do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including the Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: change of zone of the above described premises from Hamlet Business District (HB) and R-40 district to General Business District (B) 3. Such request is made for the following reasons: Change of zone to General Business District (B) with Special Exception would permit use of premises by Mullen Motors, Inc an automobile dealership and service center, which presently operates on an adjacent parcel. Richard F. Mullen, III Si nature William }. Muren STATE OF NEW YORK)ss: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Richard F. Mullen III and William ff. Mullen BEING DULY SWORN, deposes and says that uQ- Whee--is the petition in the within action; that he has read the foregoing Petition and OLAr knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to his (her) own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and that as to those matters he believe$ it to be true. of Signature Sworn to before me this 2 rK4 day of�Jll vtfi— 191 ` P otary ubIic JENNIFER B.G=0 kotay Public,Stale of New Yak No.02GO5024640 Oualiffed In Suffolk County Canmisslon Expires March 14.199� 14-16-2 (2/87)-7c 617c21 SEAR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2. and 3: " Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3.if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlist6d Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* I ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 SCHEDULE A . ALL that certain plot , piece or parcel of land, situate , lying and being at Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated on a diagram of lots belonging to Jane A. Cochran, dated October 1867 and duly filed in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk as Lots 1 & 2 and lots 26 , 27' & 28 and described property, more particularly bounded and described as follows : BEGINNING at a point at the intersection formed by the southerly line of Main Road (NYS Rt . 25 ) and the westerly line of Locust Avenue ; RUNNING THENCE from said point and place of beginning along the westerly line of Locust Avenue South 22 degrees 21 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 285 . 39 feet to a point and the northerly line of lands now or formerly of David & Janice J. Szczesny; THENCE along said lands of David & Janice J . Szczesny and lands now or formerly of William Corbett South 73 degrees 21 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 162 . 66 feet to a point and lands now or formerly of Barbara S . Adams ; THENCE along said lands of Barbara S . Adams and lands now or formerly of Richard F. Mullen, Jr. North 17 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 48 . 95 feet to a point ; THENCE North 18 degrees 05 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 109 . 47 feet to a point ; THENCE South 71 degrees 55 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 59 . 69 feet to a point ; THENCE North 15 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 171 . 74 feet to a point and the southerly line of Main Road (NYS Rt 25) ; THENCE along the southerly line of Main Road (NYS Rt 25) North 87 degrees 02 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 100 .00 feet to a point ; THENCE North 85 degrees 37 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 98 . 92 feet to the point and place of BEGINNING: • _ PART 1-PROJECT INFOk ATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist,in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effE on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consider as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additior information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information.currently available and will not invol new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and spec each instance. - NAME OF ACTION Richard F. Mullen III & William P. Mullen Zone Change Application LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) SCTM Vs 1000-62-3-22.1&24.1 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 Town of Southold, County of Suffolk NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Richard F. Mullen III & William Mullen ( 516)765-3564 ADDRESS c/o Mullen Motors, Inc. P.O. Box 1408 STATE ZIP CODE CITYIPO Southold, NY 11971 NAME OF OWNER(if different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Albert W. Albertson, Jr. and Donald B. Katz (5f6) - S ADDRESS 23275 Water Circle, Boca Raton, FL 33486 AWA CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Ferry Road , Sag Harbor ,NY 11963 DBK DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Applicants request zone change of subject premises from HB and R-4 to B to permit use of said premises by Mullen Motors, Inc. , an automobile dealership and service center. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial EiCommercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-fai ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 1.2484 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces approx .9 acres .9— acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a^sphal t. gravel and fnpsai1 a. Soil drainage: (3Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the 1` Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes ®No a. What is depth .to bedrock? (in feet). 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 910-10% 0 % 010-15% 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes ®No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes A]No 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) unknown —water provided by Greenport municipal 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes :E1No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes GNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes ®No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ❑Yes ®No Describe 13. is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation' area? ❑Yes ®No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes 6No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: none a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name none b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? aYes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ❑x Yes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes ®No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304?` Dyes ERN . 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes ®No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes ONo B. Project Description — no immediate changes to site, see attached sheet—Informational Deta 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres. _ b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed °o; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? " h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: . One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. 3 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will:be removed fro,., the site? tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intend.. purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑NO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes ❑No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated , (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑NO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ❑No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes ❑No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ❑NO a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ❑No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ❑NO Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes ❑NO a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ONO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? OYes ❑No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes ONO 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes ❑No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes ❑No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑Yes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes ❑NO If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ❑No City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ❑No City, Town Zoning Board Dyes ❑No City, County Health Department ❑Yes ❑No Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ❑No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ONo State Agencies ❑Yes ❑No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes ❑No _ If Yes, indicate decision required: D3zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan flother special except-inn 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? HB and R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? construction of three (3) additional single family dwellings on vacant R-4n lnts 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? General Business District 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? no additional development planned with the exception of possible improvement of existing parking lot on vacant lot 24 1 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? i7Yes ❑Nc 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? General Business District, Hamlet Business District, R-40 District 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/, mile? EYes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/a a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes QNc 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ❑Yes ®No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ®No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No - D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse. impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. See attached. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Rirhard F- M„llpn TTT & William fi_ M„11pn Date 6- Z-9 -7 Signature al- 1�.�/r 02�5 the OPM"Cu MS If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Addendum to Full Environmental Assessment Form-Application of Richard F. Mullen, III and William F. Mullen's Application for Zone Change(SCTM Ws 1000-62-3-22.1 &24.1) D. Informational Details As stated in their petition, applicants seek a zone change from BB and R-40 Districts to B District in order to permit use of the subject premises by Mullen Motors, Inc., an automobile dealership and service center, presently operating on adjoining premises. Applicants have no plans to change the configuration of existing buildings on the site. In the future, Mullen Motors may use one or more of the buildings on tax map lot 22.1 (commonly known as"Colonial Corners") as additional office space for its sales, clerical and inventory control operations. The subject premises also includes vacant land, identified on the tax map as lot 24.1. While the existing zoning of this lot is R-40, the property has been used as an overflow parking lot for Colonial Corners patrons and employees for many years. In the future,Mullen Motors may seek to screen and improve the parking facilities on this lot. TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of Richard F. Mullen III & William A. Mullen NOTICE TO to the Town Board of the Town of Southold. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO: RICHARD MULLEN, JR. ALBERT ALBERTSON, JR. WILLIAM CORBETT GERTRUDE KATZ DAVID SZCZESNY AND ANOTHER SOUTHLAND CORP. - ATTN: AD VALOREM TAX DORIS ZITO ANTHONY SOTO AND DEBRA L. SOTO JANET RYAN ESTHER M. PILLES CHARLES W. WITZKE DONALD B. KATZ BARBARA S. ADAMS YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to -requesta change of zone and special exception to permit use of premises by Mullen Motors Inc. , an automobile dealership and service center 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: Main Road, Southold, New York and designated on Suffolk County Tax ti Map Number as 1000 - 062.00 - 03.00 - 022.001 and 024.001 3.That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: Hamlet Business .District (HB) zand (li- District , 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone district classification: General Business District (B) S. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6.That before the relief sought may be granted,a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board;that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times or in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices;that you,or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: .June 4, 199J Richard F. Mullen III and William Mullen Petitioners Post Office Address: c/o, "16em,3g ,ors, Inc. AV v*141 tst2 d n 0. Box 1408, Southold, NY 11971 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE NAME ADDRESS Richard F. Mullen, .Jr. No # Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (as to lots 22.1 and 24.1) Albert W. Albertson, Jr. Colonial Corners, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (as to lots 22.1 and 24.1) Gertrude Katz Colonial Corners, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (as to lot 22.1) Southland Corp. Attn: Ad Valorem Tax (as to lots 22.1 and 24.1) P.O. Box 711, Dallas, TX 75221-9867 Anthony and Debra L. Soto 560 Sterling Road (as to lots 22.1 and 24. 1) Cutchogue, NY 11935 Janet Ryan Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (as to lot 22.1) Esther M. Pilles Briedstadt Ct. , Southold, NY 11971 (as to lot 22.1) Charles W. Witzke 56215 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 . (as to lot 22.1) lonald B. Katz Colonial_ Corners, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 's to lot 24.1) 'lara S. Adams P.O. Box 1074, Shelter Island Heights, NY 11965 as to lot 24.1) illiam Corb tt) P.O. Box 551; Southold, NY 11971 as to lot 2 1 David Szczesny and another 9. Sandpiper Lane, East Quogue, NY 11942 (as to lot 24. 1) Doris Zito 295 Locust Lane, P.O.. Box 181, Southold, NY 11971 (as. to lot 24.1) STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: ss.: ; da 01. %OA%/fS residing at 609 F,'r%f sf. 6reekip- ej, IU`� being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 4 f� day of `'huti 19 97 deponent mailed a true copy of the Clotice set forth on the reverse side hereof, directed to each of the abov•.-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective,names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the cur- rent assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at pi-Laeo1hef. loy ;that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (rcg4w-e4) mail. GQj Sworn to me this day of Ju►1Q , 19 '1 Notary Public AMNIPERB.000I.p Notary Pu6rio,Steno of Now Yak No.02GOW4840 Oudrwd In sunok counh, C1mmis W EVIrm March 14,tok- t 1 TAX MAP NO. .1000-62-03- zs� 7 MARY ELIZABETH GILBERT 3650 EUGENES ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N.Y . 11971 v ��.IF• 8 -. CLIFFORD SAUNDERS, JR. BUNGALOW LA. MATTITUCK NY. 11952 - c� �s = 9 MELISSA d DANIEL WILCENSK( 475 PACIFIC ST. MATTITTJ&,' NY. 11952 R80 /OJ CHARLES d EILEEN UR/BE 2621 PALL/SADE AVE. R/VERDALE N.Y. 10471 , I0,2 STEVE d VALERIA BELCH 3/ 11-741h ST.,JAab0N HE/GHIS, NY. g+ 10.3 R/CHARD J. MULLEN JR, M/LL.CREEK OR/VE WEST, SOIJTHOLD, NY 1/97l Gu+ �o __ I! RICHARD J. MULLEN JR. MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 1197I "o �< W 9 26 /0 28.1: 15 16 17. 13 EM12 ERSON CS HASBROUCK,, JR. MA cc ARYE RRRI SOUTHOLD7 RM ROAD W. WADING RIVER, N.Y. 1-9 71 �o� v \ p 9`c� 11764 14 DAN/EL POL/WODA COTTAGE PLACE. SOUTHOLD. N.Y. 11971 15 JOHN PULVER •471 COTTAGE PLACE SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 • 12 13 14 /6 GLADYS ZIMMERMAN d HELEN FINNE COTTAGE'13LACE, SOUTHOLD- N.Y. 11971 �. s l7 RICHARD H. FREDERICK 385 COTTAGE PLACE SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 18 BARBARA S ADAMS P.Q. BOX 10.74.SHELTER ISLAND HE7G�IJTS•NY. 11965 8 �Z, 19 RICHARD F. MULLEN, JR. MILL CREEK DR., -SOUTHOLD,,N.Y. 1197) 1 ❑ I I 20 RICHARD F. MULLEN JR, J 22.1 DONALD B. KA TZ 7 ALBERT K ALBERTSON, FERRY ROAD SAG HARBOR, N.Y. o N 85-97w. 11963 L OCA TION Z r Rte 25 63'p3 24.1 ALBERT W. ALBERTSON, JR. d KATZ G. ALBERTSON HORTONS LA.,SOUTHOLD, r \ MAIN RD. N eroroo-E` N.Y.S. 1000- NY. 11971 MAP I000-63' 3 100.00• 0 25 WILLIAM M. CORBETT KORN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 1000- 2-03- �„ 26 DAVID d JANICE SZCZESNY 9 SAWIPER CT., EAST OUOGUE N.Y. //942 37 0 o� 27 GEORGE d KALLIOPE KASS/MATES 86 91 188M ST. HOLLIS, W Y. II423 7 8 22. B 00 + 28 GEORGF d KALL/OPE KASSIMATES 11 O A ® Z 29 PAUL J d CkiFFORD BERRY 5106 361h AVENUE DRIVE WEST, BRADENTON, FL. 94202 _ /03 -� 0 38 �`; 30 PAUL J. d CLIFFORD BERRY 9 9 B . 0 31 HARRY J. MITCHELL, LOCUST LA. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 D s^ 32 STEPHANO PICCIN/CH 46 ALADDIN AVE.:'INIMONT, N.J. 07628 ® 12 m B - 36 33 HOWARD J. FRAUENBERG RR2 BOX60 HAWLEY, PA. /8428 46 ip _� O 34 ROY A. SCHELIN LOCUST LA. SOUTHOLD, N.Y.. 11971 13 p_ .,�.5•4o 0 mo o p N 6 35 DORIS ZITO 295 LOCUST LA. SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 v 5 B s9.6 �,i ,M• r 36 ANTHONY 4 DEBRA L..SOTO N. 560.STERLBVG ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N Y. 11977 19 R T3�•SO ,p �D\ 3 10.2 p 40 s 1. �! 37 SOUTHLAND CORP. 2828 HASKELL AVE. DALLAS TEXAS 75204 } 14 ��•66' 38 JOHN J d IRMA NUTTER 56600 MAIN RD. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 CIO SOUTHOLD SAVINGS BANK .- 39 N1COLO d DOMENICA MATTESSICH 907 WILLOW AVE. HOBOKEN, N.J. 0703 V�I B 26 3g 40 NICHOLAS JOMV d ANNA MORhV 443 NELSON AVE CLIFFS/DE PARK, N.J. 07010 34 41 GALE D. d JULIA ANN ALEXANDER ME£TIG HOUSE HILL CIRCLE, NEW FAIRFIELD, CT. 068 m V p 1000-63-03- 10.1 I1 �� 8 BLIS CORPORATION 82 TOPPING DRIVE RIVERHEAD, NY. 11901 LIS 16 ROAD 29 �. oBLESTERPORATION M. ALBERTSON P.O. BOX 695 56125 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 2t 12 ESTHER-M. PILLES BAVEDSTADT CT., SOUTHOLD, N.Y.—11971 -62-02 00 02- 33 O O' l3 JANET RYAN MAW RD. SOUTHOLD, N Y. 11971 p00-61- 30 /4 JOHN d MARY PIETRODANGELO P.O. BOX 516 MAW RO. SOUTHOLD N.Y 11971 11. KpRN 1 -n Al 15 ALBERT d RITA C. COHEN 56655 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. II9�1 1 O 0 31 16• JOHN J. SCOPAZ CIO VALERIE SCOPAZ P.O. BOX 1655 SOUTHOLD NY. 11971 2 ZQ. Q 32 17.2 ANTHONY ZUSTOV/CH P.O. BOX 869 PLAADOME STATION MANHA?iS T, N.Y. 11030 26 EDMUND PRE•S.SLER GROVE DRIVE SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 I 30 55 281 CHARLF W. WITZKE 56215 MAW RD. SOUT!W, N.Y 11971 p APPLICANTS,�pr� l000 - 63 rL7.� � 3( � I UAV/D E. ROBW 3 850 SON 6 MAW RD. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 119T! RICHARD F. MULLEN ill. 5 6 PAUL R,J% d ELIZABETH H. BURNS 275 TOWN HARBOR LANE SOUTHOLD, N.Y 11971 WILLIAM F. MULLEN 3 25 9� 32 /000-64- 02- CIO-MUL L EN MO TORS ;., A Z z / DONALD d DONNA' S.BRENNAN 128 LAKEWOOD AVE. HO HO KUS N.J. MA/At ROAD =� 2 KEITH R. d TERRY A. JENSEN 112 K/ME AVE. NORTH BABYLO/� NI.Y. I1703 SOUTHOLD, N.Y 11971 3 RICHARD A. d JOAN R BECKMANN 8523 HUNTER CREEK TRAIL POTOMAC MD. Z3 4 RICHARD A. d JOAN R. BECKMAAW 25 JUDI� E. BARKAN 7808 �OAGVBE JACKSON HEIGHTS B Y. AROOKL 2 N 11201.Y. =" 27.01 FRANK P. d BETSY W/D/RSTKY FOUNDERS PATH, b;OUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 { --- = ZONING DISTRICT LINE MAP PREPARED FOR — TAX MAP BLOCK AND OR SECTION LINE ZONE CHANGE CHANGE-ZONE FROM HB d_ R4O AT SOUTHOLD B -ausiNEss TO B D - DWELLINGTOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. U .- 1GARAGE OR,�SHED 1000 - 62- 03-22.1& 24.1 .;. 1000-64-02- Sala, l"= 200� 29.1 DARLENE W/D/RSTKY 250 KORN ROAD SOUTHOLD N.Y 11971 M8 7, 1997 - S 30 JOHN d MARTHA OHLMANN 1/8 48 22C ST. aai9 A HEIGHTS , N.Y, y PE S R 3/ JOHN B. d ELIZABETH S/MCK SOTHOLD N.Y 11971 (5/6 6,5 ik 54 JOAN ARNSTEW /0 DOWNING ST. NEW FORK N.Y. APT.2X 10014 P. Q. 55 MICHEL WAL TER d WAL TER NA hUW SAAFORb LOCUST LA. SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 1230 REST 32 BERRY B. d SANORS K. NOVICK 1680 YORK AVE., N.Y. N.Y. APT. IE SOUTHOL , 11971 i 97-173 YS.. Rte. 25) IN ROAD C , M 98.92 N. 85037'00 E- N. 87`02'00` E. 100.00of ewe n Pn f vw,;IN , 1 Ist r 4 C. p sq o ao da ��v Z . Z,o.z- � �.• N N OQ• R P w o c fn Z O : Cs, e- - k 3�0.5" o M o p m e �2�•�: �- � SUR VEY OF PROPER T Y T •o5�.e w /Slyw boo- A T SOUTHOLD IFL- 2, Z9.1b,U , w �i �, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD N _ L SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. � 1000 - 62 - 03 - 22.1& 24.1 .� z ° Scale: 1" - 40' May 6, 1997 ,40. /_- S. 71.559.69 0 • LET \ w Z 3_ LOT 33 �O � ' '� 27 CERTIFIED TO, c� LOT RICHARD F. MULLEN III WILLIAM F. MULLEN 32 LOT m°�. - (no d- 26 - Z °�°� L 162,66106) - 3� O u► DO ~: �62�9i ICe J. LOT — �� & Jan 'r �o m;;� 32�150• W• �/F pgV�d �a\E OF NFIi S' 7 LOT 25 N15z�zes�Y S'o�,N T. MFT? AREA - Z2484 Acres William � a N1 01F bet t 00 ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION To?HIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION U� �, OF SEcTov 72os OF THE NEw Y.ORK STATE EDUCA77ON LAW, LOT NUMBERS ARE REFERENCED TO -.� ` Y.S. LIC. NO. 49618 EXCEPT. AS PER SECTION 7208-SUBDIVISION 2. ALL CERTIFICATIONS •> MAP OF PROPERTY OF JENN/E A. 9� HEREON ARE VALD FOR FHlS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF COCHRAN` FILED IN THE OFFICE OF P RS, P.C. SAID MAP,OR COPIES BEAR THE A1IPRESSEO SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK AS (5/6J 7 O WHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON. N MAP N0. 399. ` P. -O. BOX 909 ADDITIONALLY TO COMPLY WITH SAW.LAW THE TERM ALTERED BY' 1230 TRAVELER STREET OF TNO ME � OR S/AP. rM SURVEYORS SUCH ASI LNV PECTEDP COPY ����rs�a� 05-Z/-97 SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 NrLSI3N, POPE M VOORHIS, LLC { C N V i Pt O N M E N T A L F L A N N I N O - C 6 N r, U L T i N G CHARLES J.VOORHIS.CEP,AICP•ARTHUR J.KOERBER,P.E.-VINCENT G.DONNELLY,P.E. I •NICTOR BERT.P.E. JOSEPH R.EPIFANIA,RE,-AOSERT G.NELSON,JR,P.E. CHRISTOPHER W.ROBINSON,P.E. May 24, 1999 . RECEIVED-4,c�, Ms, Betty Neville, Town Clerk Southold Town Board MAY 2 4 1999 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold To" Southold, New York 11971 Re, Review of EAF Part III Richard-h'"Mullen III and William Mullen Zone Change Application SCTM No. 10.00-62-03-22j & 24.1. NP&V Job No.-97208 Dear Ms. Neville: As per the request of the Southold Town Board, (as SEQRA-designated Lead Agency) we have completed a review of the above-referenced document. This review is intended to: 1) examine the EAF Part M for completeness with respect to the items presented in the September 10, 1998 review (attached); 2) comment on.the responses;provided by the Applicant, and; 3) provide recommendations to the'Board regarding environmerital issues and compliance. It should be noted that as this application has been classified as a 'type I action, a Conditioned Negative Declaration (CND) is not allowed.• That is, it is not possible for .. the Lead Agency to issue a Negative Declaration on - the application, witli an accompanying.list of conditions which the Applicant must first satisfy. As a result, only a Negative Declaration or Positive Declaration is allowed. The EAF Part Ill generally addresses those items referenced in the September 10, 1998 correspondence from this office with respect to-visual impacts, cutting-of trees on the property, land use conflicts and traffic. However, the document leaves some questions incompletely addressed in regard to .growth-inducing aspects, traffic- (parking), and aesthetic impacts (lighting). The traffic engineering examination prepared for the EAF Part Ill by Dunn Engineering Associates P,C. clearly demonstrates that the Mullen Motors dealership has a- deficit of parking. The on-site parking supply occasionally does.not.meet the demand for.customer and employee parking, vehicle storage and cars stored prior to servicing. The study indicates that there are times when vehicles are parked on, the adjacent site_ Increasing on-site parking will address this existing demand. There is no•increase in the parking demand and no additional outdoor storage and sales area as a result of this-application. 572 WAl'T WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE, NY 11747.816E (1516) 427-5aS5 FAX e5167 427.5sec f ' Mullen Motors EAF Part III Review NP&v No.97208 After review of the balance of the EAF Part M provided by the Applicant, this office recommends that acceptance of the document be held in abeyance pending provision of additional details in the below-listed areas. The reviewer acknowledges the effort taken by and on the behalf of the Applicant to provide the Lead Agency with specific information in regard to the planned project, as well as to provide mitigation measures, which will alleviate impacts. However, in consideration of the duality of life issues involved in this application, we recommend that the Board consider obtaining specific details in certain matters, as follows: What, if anything, is the Applicant planning to do about the reduction in parking space available for Colonial Corner patrons? At present, the lot to be converted to Mullen Motors parking is presently used for overflow parking for Colonial Corners, as Colonial corners has insufficient parking. • Specify the planned height of the new lighting poles, as well as any design or operation measures taken in this matter which would reduce or.eliminate potential impacts to the adjacent residences from fugitive lighting. (e.g., reduced lighting intensity, reduced number of lighting fixtures, reduced hours of lighting, shrouds, reoriented lighting direction). Specify the minimum height and/or diameter at breast height (dbh) for the 5 new street trees on Locust Avenue,to replace the 5 large trees that were cut down. • Is the Applicant willing to agree to a number of Covenants and Restrictions (C&R's) in regard to the traffic and operation of the facility? If so, following are suggested C&Ws: 1. No access to Locust Avenue from the new parking lot. 2. No Certificate of Occupancy for the new parking lot until all landscaping, lighting,drainage systems,etc. are completed,for both parking lots. 3. Cessation of the existing auto storage, parking, and outdoor repair work along west side of the Mullen Motors building. 4. No test driving by Mullen employees on residential side streets in the vicinity. 5. No parking, unloading/loading, or use of side streets in the vicinity by trucks related to Mullen Motors. 6. Limitations on the hours when such deliveries are allowed, to 8AM-5PM, weekdays. To provide additional parking mitigation in the vicinity, and to further protect the "rural feel" of the Town, the Town could install "No Parking" signs on Cottage Place along the Mullen Motors property, as well as on the south side of Main Road along the frontage of site. In regard to the potential for impact if the Colonial Corners site is redeveloped, the EAF, Part III states: The applicant acknowledges that there has been speculation that Mullen Motors' intention is to expand onto the Colonial Corners property. However,'Mullen Motors has Page 2 VO'd 1C1O1 Mullen Motors EAF Part III Review NP&V No_97208 no current plans for expansion. If, at sometime in the future, business demands were such that an expansion was contemplated, the applicant would be required to,file the appropriate applications with the Town of Southold and would be subject to environmental review pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 6127, As indicated in The SEQ,RA Handbook (NYSDEC 1992, page 22), review of the impacts of future actions are not required if such actions are speculative, may not occur, and are functionally independent of each other(pg. 22). The Applicant is not contemplating redevelopment of the Colonial Corners site at this time. When and if such action is taken, the required application would be based upon a specific Site Plan and would require a separate, full review under SEQRA. As a CND is not an option, the proposed C&R's must be incorporated into the actual project, if a Negative Declaration is to be supported. In this way, the concerns of the community will be addressed, while the community and Applicant will benefit from the improved operations on the project site. The project will address the current insufficiency of parking on the adjacent Mullen Motors property, while the proposed landscaping and prohibition of access to Locust Avenue will mitigate aesthetic impacts for the adjacent and nearby residences, If implemented in conformance with Town standards and the accompanying C&R's, the proposed lighting would not significantly impact the adjacent residences: Therefore, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in significant adverse environmental impacts, and in fact would represent a significant improvement in the overall environmental quality of the operation now present on the site, If there are any new or unsatisfied concerns of the Town.Board, the option to issue a Positive Declaration remains, followed by the preparation of a Draft EIS. However, as indicated above, the EAF Part III adequately addresses the majority of the environmental and planning concerns of the Town, requiring only'a small amount of specificity in regard to certain issues to be deemed complete. Please advise if you wish further assistance in the preparation of a Determination of Significance. Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this review, and please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, N olv C G arles I oorhis, CEP AICP att Page 3 CAROLYN. A. Z ENR D �� ATTORNEY AT LAW 121 Ponquogue Avenue Hampton Bays, New York 11946 516-723-2341 SEP 2 1999 Southold Town Board c/o Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Sout1�O6�l�'A� 53095 Main Road Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 Re: Mullen Motors Change of Zone request/Environmental assessment of the wrong action and requirement for an environmental impact statement as a matter of law. August 27th, 1999 Dear Members of the Southold Town Board, I am the attorney representing a number of homeowners in Founders Estates, a residential community surrounding the Mullen Motors car dealership, located south of New York State Route 25, near Locust Lane and Cottage Place. I have reviewed the Part III Environmental Assessment Form submitted by Freudenthal and Elkowitz Consulting Group, dated April 1999, prepared for the Mullen Motors Corporation. I have also reviewed the May 24th, 1999 letter from Southold's Town consultants- Nelson, Pope and Voorhis- which constitutes a review of the Part III EAF. I) THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM PART III IS LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT AS A MATTER OF LAW BECAUSE IT EVALUATES THE WRONG ACTION. The PART III EAF submitted by the applicant is legally insufficient as a matter of law. Quite simRIX, it is deficient because it evaluates the wrong action. The action at issue is a change of zone -for the existing Colonial Corners shopping centers from Hamlet Business to General Business, as well as a change-of- zone for the lot immediately south thereof, from Residential-40 to General Business. The EAF evaluates only a proposed site plan for a parking lot. According to the applicant, the alleged need for the change-of- zone is to enable the contract vendee2 to expand a pre-existing nonconforming use by establishing an additional 36 car parking lot in an already 1Colonial Corners is located at the corner of County Route 25 and Locust Lane. 2It bears emphasis that the Mullen Motors Corporation does not even own the land at issue, and yet seeks a zone change upon it. page 2 blighter: area. If this were in fact correct, why is the applicant seeking a change of zone for Colonial Corners itself, when this is not necessary for the establishment of a parking lot? I submit that the applicants are less than forthcoming. If this was truly the applicant's intent, why take the windfall approach of changing the zoning on two separate parcels of land to a more intense, commercial use? while the applicant verbally assures the Southold Town Board that it does not seek any of the uses that the change-of-zone would permit once the zone is changed, these uses are permitted as a matter of law. In addition, there are no legal documents on record that would ensure that Colonial Corners would not be destroyed or the applicant would limit himself to a parking lot. The applicant states in his EAF Part III, "As no changes to the northern segment of the property housing the Colonial Corners development are proposed, no further discussion of this section of the property will be provided in this Part III EAF. " (p. 1 EAF Part III) This is ridiculous. The applicant cannot fail to study the very topic at issue, namely a change-of-zone. At page 3 of the Environmental Assessment Form Part III, the applicant states: Consideration of the impacts of changes to Colonial Corners or expansion to Mullen Motors is not appropriate at this time as: There is no proposed plan for changes to the Colonial Corners development nor is an expansion of Mullen Motors to the Colonial Corners property proposed. Thus, such actions are, at best, speculative; Changes to Colonial Corners and/or the expansion of Mullen Motors may never occur; and Any changes that may be proposed to Colonial Corners or Mullen Motors in the future are functionally independent of the proposed action. Furthermore, any future actions that may be proposed would require environmental review pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 . The Town's consultants seek to reassure the Town that there would be some control over the project through future site plan review and State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) analysis. However, once these uses are allowed as a matter of right, site plan review and SEQRA will only be able to mitigate harm to the neighborhood, not prevent it. To make an analogy, even if you dress a mule up in a silk skirt, it is still a mule. Once the zone change is passed, you will only be able to minimize the damage to the neighborhood by way of conditions. A change-of-zone clearly constitutes an "action" within the meaning of the SEQRA regulations and must be evaluated as such. page 3 "Actions" are defined in the State Environmental Quality Review Act regulations at 6 N.Y.C.R.R. 617.2b) thus: ( 1) projects or physical activities, such as construction or other activities that may affect the environment by changing the use, appearance, or condition of any natural resource or structure, that: iii) require one or more new or modified approvals from an agency or agencies; 3) •adoption of agency rules, regulations and procedures, including local laws, codes, ordinances, executive orders and resolutions that may affect the environment; and 4) any combinations of the above. e) "Approval" means a discretionary decision by an agency to issue a permit, certificate, license, lease or other entitlement or to otherwise authorize a proposed project or activity. A change- of- zone constitutes an action within the meaning of SEAR. Since the change-of-zone enables intense commercial uses that are currently prohibited at the site, the new commercial uses must be evaluated as a matter of law. II) THE RECORD ESTABLISHES THAT THE PROPOSED CHANGE-OF-ZONE WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO SUBURBAN SPRAWL, HURT LOCAL BUSINESSES AND THE RESORT- BASED ECONOMY, BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE RURAL AND HISTORIC CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND TOWN, AND POSE TRAFFIC SAFETY HAZARDS. The record establishes that the expansion of Mullen Motors Inc. and the change of zone would have the following undesirable impacts on the neighborhood: 1) The change-of-zone would increase the suburban sprawl already encroaching on the area, by expanding an automotive use, one of the uses most at odds with the rural, residential character of the neighborhood; 2) The change-of-zone would be detrimental to local small Mom and Pop businesses as it would injure the resort-based economy by detracting further from Southold's small Town charm. It bears emphasis that to be successful, Southold's business community must be able to successfully compete. Obviously, we can never compete with the low prices that up- island vendors can provide. Our success lies in our small town charm. Nothing detracts faster from the rural quality of the hamlet than automotive uses. Their chain link fences, halogen lights, sprawling parking lots, metallic cars, and used car signs are the very symbol of suburban and urban blight; page 4 3) The change-of-zone would detract from the rural qualities of Southold by allowing general business uses which are much more intense than residential uses and hamlet business uses. For example, while residential zoning allows such uses as farms, horse farms, churches, and residences, the general business zone allows fast food marts, gas stations, car washes, bars, and warehouses; 4) The change-of-zone would detract from the historic qualities of Southold; 5) The change-of-zone would introduce additional traffic hazards into a residential neighborhood with small children, such as those posed by huge tractor trailers; 6) The change-of-zone would reduce neighborhood property values; These impacts are illustrated by the photographic exhibits enclosed with this letter. The first set of photographs (Exhibits 1A, 1B, and 1C) depict the character of the surrounding neighborhood, with the exception of the Mullen Motors Car Dealership. As you can see, there are some quaint historic homes in the R-40 zone, including salt box houses with picket fences. Exhibit 1C depicts the charming houses that existed in this area before Mullen Motors built its current parking lot. A number of beautiful, early colonial homes were destroyed or removed to accommodate this business to the detriment of Southold's historic character. Exhibits 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D depict some of the existing businesses near Locust Lane that are consistent with the historic character and charm of Southold. They include the Colonial Presbyterian Church, the Currie Bell House Museum, the Thomas Moore House Museum, a Colonial Bed and Breakfast, the Federalist Inn and Restaurant, and others. Exhibit 3A depicts Colonial Corners. Colonial style homes, converted into shops, blend nicely with the existing character of the residential neighborhood. The architecture is consistent with the colonial style of Southold. The buildings are to-scale and nicely landscaped. The change-of-zone could allow the destruction of this entire development for such intense uses as fast food restaurants and gas stations. Exhibit 4A, 4B, and 4C depict the existing Mullen Motors car dealership. This development is in sharp contrast to those depicted in the prior photographs. The corporate building is modern, flat, and ugly. Plastic signs mark the site. An ugly chain link fence surrounds the building. There are cars parked everywhere. There is little, if any, landscaping to buffer the ugly view. Exhibit 4C depicts some of the buildings of Mullen Motors. Note the lack of landscaping and the wall-to-wall pavement. Exhibit number 4B depicts the dealership once page 5 again. The cars, chain-link fencing, halogen lights, and the sign hung from what appears to be a pipe are all ugly and highly visible. Exhibit 5A depicts some of the very intense uses that the change of zone would allow. These uses should be contrasted with Exhibits 1 through 3. Among these uses are a car dealership, a warehouse, a car wash, a gas station, and a fast food mart. Exhibit 6A and 6B depict some of the safety concerns already associated with the existing Mullen Motors Inc. , which include concerns about oversized car carriers roaring through pedestrian- oriented hamlets. The carriers pose traffic dangers on the very narrow, overcrowded County Route 25. They rumble down residential streets creating noise and fumes. They endanger small children in the neighborhood. Allowing the Mullen Motors Corporation to expand further would pose additional, similar problems. Exhibit 7A depicts the bright, obnoxious halogen lights already associated with the facility. These lights glare into the neighbors' eyes at night. Additional bright, glaring lights would be needed to illuminate the cars, increasing this nuisance further. Exhibit 8 depicts the damage already inflicted to the area proposed for a parking. lot. Majestic trees, over one half century old were cut down, some three feet across. Note that these trees were cut before the developers received permission from the Town of Southold to construct a parking lot. Note also, that a lush, vegetative canopy still remains which continues to help buffer the residential neighborhood. The buffer lessens noise from County Route 25 and helps screen residential properties from commercial properties. II) AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT MUST BE PREPARED AS A MATTER OF LAW BECAUSE THE PROPOSED ACTION ,MAY,, HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. The record makes it clear that the proposed action "may" have a significant effect on the environment. Thus, an environmental impact statement is required as a matter of law. The State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) regulations make it clear that an environmental impact statement is required for the proposed action. 6 N.Y.C.R.R. 617. 1 d) states: The basic purpose of SEQR is to incorporate the consideration of environmental factors into the existing planning, review and decision-making processes of state, regional and local government agencies at the earliest possible time. To accomplish this goal, SEQR requires that all agencies determine whether the actions they directly undertake, fund or approve may have a significant impact on the environment, and if it is determined that the action may have a significant adverse impact, prepare or request an environmental imgact statement page 6 6 N.Y.C.R.R. 617.7 b) requires that, for all Type I and Unlisted actions the lead agency making a determination of significance must: 3) thoroughly analyze the identified relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the action may have a significant adverse impact on the environment; . . . 6 N.Y.C.R.R. 617. 7 c) sets forth the test for making this determination: Criteria for determining significance. 1) To determine whether a proposed Type I or Unlisted action may have a significant adverse impact on the environment, the impacts that may be reasonably expected to result from the proposed action must be compared against the criteria in this subdivision. The following list is illustrative, not exhaustive. These criteria are considered indicators of significant adverse impacts on the environment: i) a substantial adverse change in existing. . .traffic or noise levels: . . . ; ii) the removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation. . . v) the impairment of the character or quality of important historical, . . .architectural, or aesthetic resources or of existing community or. neighborhood character; vii) the creation of a hazard to human health; x) the creation of a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above consequences; Also See 6 N.Y.C.R.R. 617.2 for the definition of environment. The record clearly establishes that the change-of-zone would substantially increase existing traffic or noise levels, thus triggering criteria #i) . The record establishes that the historic, rural, aesthetic, and residential quality of the neighborhood would be detrimentally affected by the expansion of the Mullen Motors Corporation; thus triggering criteria # v) . The record establishes that oversized car carriers rolling through residential neighborhoods and pedestrian-oriented hamlets are already creating a serious traffic hazard. Expanding Mullen Motors would exacerbate this condition more, thus triggering criteria #vii) . Finally, the record establishes that a change-of-zone would create a "material demand" for more intense commercial development that would result in all of the above consequences, thus triggering criteria x. page 7 In sum, an environmental impact statement is required as a matter of law. It bears emphasis, that to pass a negative declaration, the board must determine that the project will not have any significant environmental impacts. 6 N.Y.C.R. R. 617. 2 y) provides: Negative declaration" means a written determination by a lead agency that the implementation of the action, as proposed, will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. . . (Emphasis added) . It is clear from this record, that such a determination would defy the facts of the case. CONCLUSION There is no advantage to the Town of Southold what-so-ever in allowing this change of zone. Indeed, there are substantial detriments from both an economic and quality-of-life point of view. The record makes it perfectly clear that the proposed action will definitely have a negative and significant impact on the environment. Therefore, if the Board wishes to continue with this project, it must issue a positive declaration under SEQRA. We would recommend that the change-of-zone simply be denied based upon the clear evidence already in the record. Sincerely, Carolyn Z k Attorney t La cc: Town Clerk Town Attorneys Planning Board Town Planner Zoning Board of Appeals Trustees Code Enforcement officer/Chairman of the Building Department Nelson, Pope, and Voorhis Suffolk Times Times Review Suffolk Life Traveler Watchman �K�FF�( JEAN W. COCHRAN Supervisor GREGORY F.YAKABOSKI 5% Gy TOWN ATTORNEY c 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road y P.O.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 �� Telephone(516) 765-1889 Fax(516) 765-1823 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD FROM: GREGORY F. YAKABOSKI, ESQ., TOWN ATTORNEY MARY C. WILSON,ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEYS DATE: JULY 15, 1999 SUBJECT: MULLEN REZONING PROPOSAL I understand the Planning Board has addressed the above referenced petition for rezoning but had additional issues regarding parking which had to be addressed prior to the Planning Board issuing its report and recommendation. Kindly advise our office when the outstanding issue regarding parking has been addressed and when a complete report can be expected as the County Planning Department will not review this proposal until the Town Planning Board has rendered its report. Thank you for your attention to this matter. JJUL-151999 WATn r + T � CAROLYN A. ZENR ATTORNEY AT LAW 121 Ponquogue Avenue Hampton Bays, New York 11946 516-723-2341 Southold Town Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ` a74 July 9t'h, 1998 RE: PETITION AGAINST A CHANGE OF ZONE FOR MULLEN MOTORS CAR DEALERSHIP. Dear Members of the Southold Town Board, I represent a number of Southold property owners and residents in the vicinity of the Mullen Motors car dealership. As you know, William and Richard Mullen have applied to your board to down grade a 1.25 acre parcel , of land located at the southwest corner of NYS Route 25 and Locust Lane from a Hamlet Business and Residential zone to an intense commercial zone known as General Business. Numerous Southold residents and business owners have vigorously protested this down-zoning. Attached you will find two separate petitions urging you to reject this change of zone request. (See . Exhibits A and B) . In total, 1060 citizens have objected to this change of zone. Recently, I forwarded another protest petition to you, wherein adjoining property owners and property owners opposite the Mullen Motors site, objected to this change of zone.. Under Town Law section 265, a super majority (five affirmative votes) of the Town Board is now required to change the zone. I opposed this change of zone by sworn affirmation on the 29th day of September 1997 based upon fifteen years of land use planning experience in the Towns of Southampton, East Hampton, and Shelter Island as a Planner and Environmental Attorney with the Group for the South Fork. The Group for the South Fork is the East End's leading environmental protection organization. I emphasized that officials had assessed the wrong action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, namely a parking lot proposal, when in fact. the application before the board is for a comprehensive change of zone, which would run with the land and allow numerous uses. These uses, if allowed, would ,downgrade this neighborhood, create suburban sprawl, hurt local businesses that depend on small down town charm to survive, and invite tacky automobile-intensive and other :a r � ` " r ti page 2 highly intensive uses. This change of zone would restrict neither Mullen Motors or future property owners to one use. I also emphasized that residential zones are far less commercial and more attractive zones, allowing for such uses as farms, horse farms, vineyards, churches, libraries, art galleries, and museums. These uses contrast sharply with the uses allowed in the General Business zone like fast food restaurants, (7-11s, McDonalds etc. ) warehouses, gas stations, car washes, bars, and food processing plants. I informed you that the change of zone would allow "Colonial Corners" to be torn down and converted to intense, unattractive commercial uses since there is no legal guarantee that the developer would stick to casual verbal representations that the property would only be used for a parking lot and not for other uses. Sprawling suburban parking lots have bright flood lights that disturb residents, degrade neighborhoods, and reduce property values. They have no place in historic Southold. PLEASE REJECT THIS CHANGE OF ZONE REQUEST consistent with the will of your constituency, and preserve the rural charm of Southold and local business interests. Sincerely, Carol Ze Atto ey a Law . cc: Town Attorney Planning Board Zoning Board of Appeals Nelson, Pope, and Voorhis Code Enforcement/Building Department Code Committee Press ( T P E T I T I O N SAVE COLONIAL CORNERS STOP SUBURBAN SPRAWL PROTECT LOCAL BUSINESSES SAFEGUARD PROPERTY VALUES WHEREAS, we are proud to be residents of Southold Town, a town rich in history, steeped in colonial tradition, blessed with lush green farm fields, breath-taking water-front views, beaches, and charming hamlet centers which provide us with one of the highest qualities of life in America; WHEREAS, we are disgusted by the sprawling development in western Suffolk, characterized by strip malls, car dealerships, gas stations, sprawling parking lots, and neon lights; development which has ruined the quality of life, replaced Mom and Pop businesses with national chains, and wrecked property values; WHEREAS, the Mullen Motors Corporation resembles this up island development pattern with its sprawling parking lot filled with cars, chain-linked fences,. lack of a sidewalk, and sparse landscaping; WHEREAS, William and Richard Mullen have applied to expand this car dealership further; erect another parking lot, and chop down old trees and vegetation which would mean more suburban sprawl; WHEREAS, the Corporation requests a change of zone for Colonial Corners to the General Business zone which would allow it to be leveled for a parking lot, developed as a fast food restaurant strip, and allow ugly gas stations, car washes, and warehouses there; WHEREAS, this zone change would destroy the character of the neighborhood, lower property values, and harm the tourist-based economy and local business which depend heavily on their charm and appearance to attract customers; THEREFORE, we the undersigned, business persons and residents of Southold, request that THE TOWN BOARD VOTE NO TO THIS CHANGE OF ZONE: NAME ADDRESS PHONE SIGNATURE 7c/.Cr_ _�_C_U 1 Z_�-CQlt-�cz-c--Drl�__�to J -�.f T�_O� •t C-.�_rZ `-----J j -�{-y 1nUJLi - ------ � J>�_ �� 7 ----------- -------- --- - -------_T--------------------------------------- �-i. — -- ---------- � - l o�_S aCc w��_ i �j -------? ----------- 7) =� = --,j- -- -- ----- ------------ =- �_tl__2 71--------------------------------- �.--------k-- =---- ^ . -�L------ =--- --1 --------------------------------------- WITNESS+ J T ITAU�4AIF) PHt' 7A _ �0 )/,, DATE f t P E T I T I O N / SAVE COLONIAL CORNERS STOP SUBURBAN SPRAWL PROTECT LOCAL BUSINESSES SAFEGUARD PROPERTY VALUES WHEREAS, we are proud to be residents of Southold Town, a town rich in history, steeped in colonial tradition, blessed with lush green farm fields, breath-taking water-front views, beaches, and charming hamlet centers which provide us with one of the highest qualities of life in America; WHEREAS, we are disgusted by the sprawling development in western Suffolk, characterized by strip malls, car dealerships, gas stations, sprawling parking lots, and neon lights; development which has ruined the quality of life, replaced Mom and Pop businesses with national chains, and wrecked property values; WHEREAS, the Mullen Motors Corporation resembles this up island development pattern with its sprawling parking lot filled .with cars, chain-linked fences,. lack of a sidewalk, and sparse landscaping; WHEREAS, William and Richard MullLsn have applied to expand this car dealership further, erect another parking lot, and chop down old trees and vegetation which would mean more suburban sprawl; WHEREAS, the Corporation requests a change of zone for Colonial Corners to the General Business zone which would allow it to be leveled for a parking lot, developed as a fast food restaurant strip, and allow ugly gas stations, car washes, and warehouses there; WHEREAS, this zone change would destroy tChe character of the neighborhood, lower property values, anti harm the -tourist-based economy and local business which depend heavily on their charm and appearance to attract customers; THEREFORE, we the undersigned, business persons and residents of Southold, request that THE TOWN BOARD VOTE NO TO THIS CHANGE OF ZONE: NAME ADDRESS PHONE SIGNATURE ---------2 :_---- �' ---t----�= 4----------------- t1s�,£�------- �) lG�.i _ _I re�----j 9------------------�- 1� ------___- �` ---------- ----------- ------ -- fi . ' _ --- r_--- -- � - -- --- - ��=-�- '.51-Z------------------- ��� ---�!`--�- ------------- PHA wrrNeSS: / . C C, ��,�r• 7/.S' S /) r DAYE 1 � PACE a � � S 1 I P E T I T I O N SAVE COLONIAL, CORNERS STOP SUBURBAN SPRAWL PROTECT LOCAL BUSINESSES SAFEGUARD PROPERTY VALUES WHEREAS, we are proud to be residents of Southold Town, a town rich in history, steeped in colonial tradition, blessed with lush green farm fields, breath-taking water-front views, beaches, and charming hamlet centers which provide us with one of the highest qualities of life in America; WHEREAS, we are disgusted by the sprawling development in western Suffolk, characterized by strip malls, car dealerships, gas stations, sprawling parking lots, and neon lights; development which has ruined the quality of life, replaced Mom and Pop businesses with national chains, and wrecked property values; WHEREAS, the Mullen Motors Corporation resembles this up island development pattern with its sprawling parking lot filled with cars, chain-linked fences, lack of a sidewalk, and sparse landscaping; WHEREAS, William and Richard Mullen have applied to expand this car dealership further, erect another parking lot, and- chop down old trees and vegetation which would mean more suburban sprawl; WHEREAS, the Corporation requests a change of zone for Colonial Corners to the General Business zone which would allow it to be leveled for a parking lot, developed as a fast food restaurant strip, and allow ugly gas stations, car washes, and warehouses there; WHEREAS, this zone change would destroy the character of the neighborhood, lower property values, and harm the tourist-based economy and local business which depend heavily on their charm and appearance to attract customers; THEREFORE-, 'we the undersigned, business persons and residents of Southold, request that THE TOWN BOARD VOTE NO TO THIS CHANGE OF ZONE: # PRINT NAME �DD Oaf. OGNATW PHONE DATE r z UT 5 �eha, a NM' m lI5b 3c> 2TL o G r^ A4 i 3WV I e�. el Sc W4" 1$f5 Flee+► W0 Ak CIA 73' - 5 013 b 13 WITNESS: c PH#_ DATE 2 3 SaGE# 3 C � 1 P E T I T I O N SAVE COLONIAL CORNERS STOP SUBURBAN SPRAWL PROTECT LOCAL BUSINESSES SAFEGUARD PROPERTY VALUES WHEREAS, we are proud to be residents of Southold Town, a town rich in history, steeped in colonial tradition, blessed with lush green farm fields, breath-taking water-front views, beaches, and charming hamlet centers which provide us with one of the highest qualities of life in America; WHEREAS, we are disgusted by the sprawling development in western Suffolk, characterized by strip malls, car dealerships, gas stations, sprawling parking lots, and neon lights; development which has ruined the quality of life, replaced Mom and Pop businesses with national chains, and wrecked property values; WHEREAS, the Mullen Motors Corporation resembles this up island development pattern with its sprawling parking lot filled with cars, chain-linked fences, lack of a sidewalk, and sparse landscaping; WHEREAS, William and Richard Mullen have applied to expand this car dealership further, erect another parking lot, and- chop down old trees and vegetation which would mean more suburban sprawl; WHEREAS, the Corporation requests a change of zone for Colonial Corners to the General Business zone which would allow it to be leveled for a parking lot, developed as a fast food restaurant strip, and allow ugly gas stations, car washes, and warehouses there; WHEREAS, this zone change would destroy the character of the neighborhood, lower property values, and harm the tourist-based economy and local business which depend heavily on their charm and appearance to attract customers; THEREFORE,, we the undersigned, business persons and residents of Southold, request that THE TOWN BOARD VOTE NO TO THIS CHANGE OF ZONE: # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE r .s' o} Loc vs f L.�r/12 7 3J o sLame, sic tl _ 1 C�-- W3 . . WITNESS: DATE /,4 AGE# L P E T I T I O N SAVE COLONIAL CORNERS STOP SUBURBAN SPRAWL PROTECT LOCAL BUSINESSES SAFEGUARD PROPERTY VALUES WHEREAS, we are proud to be residents of Southold Town, a town rich in history, steeped in colonial tradition, blessed with lush green farm fields, breath-taking water-front views, beaches, and charming hamlet centers which provide us with one of the highest qualities of life in America; WHEREAS, we are disgusted by the sprawling development in western Suffolk, characterized by strip malls, car dealerships, gas stations, sprawling parking lots, and neon lights; development which has ruined the quality of life, replaced Mom and Pop businesses with national chains, and wrecked property values; WHEREAS, the Mullen Motors Corporation resembles this up island development pattern with its sprawling parking lot filled with cars, chain-linked fences, lack of a sidewalk, and sparse landscaping; WHEREAS, William and Richard Mullen have applied to expand this car dealership further, erect another parking lot, and- chop down old trees and vegetation which would mean more suburban sprawl; WHEREAS, the Corporation requests a change of zone for Colonial Corners to the General Business zone which would allow it to be leveled for a parking lot, developed as a fast food restaurant strip, and allow ugly gas stations, car washes, and warehouses there; WHEREAS, this zone change would destroy the character of the neighborhood, lower property values, and harm the tourist-based economy and local business which depend heavily on their charm and appearance to attract customers; THEREFORE-, 'we the undersigned, business persons and residents of Southold, request that THE TOWN BOARD VOTE NO TO THIS CHANGE OF ZONE: # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE I)ATE ,w an A\ 10 koU1,d r 6 P#1 y3 >v G- - yi 1 LIS � s a� ?. 6�w �d . L(.-'A Ud A r y 3jV y /o c o r 1 D yo r `1 • , �. 7�� 37�'p' 7 �' PH# DATE-��-PAGE# 5 TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F. MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H. MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB) AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND (R-40) (DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00- 022.001 AND 024.001) TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE (B) FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS, A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE . ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS i.e. TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F. MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H. MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F. MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H. MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. ol TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS i.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DAM j dn.1 "S0+0lob aGU. L , d J- r La' L .5 wvyA 3i f0 Loci, L C)bU-� b E �. '� •IGd3e�acvsl Lf'��ou I1nLU ^. Gs Coo 4Cc 2 L Soo+ho1 ^a,, clk 6S-�34s� -3I = c� 8 P'o AiWrl —l&A--"'L I o e S e,r a h , i row i� ors ids �5 L-'lrnmec�ie u. �C���d/ sr Ig �960 GCS I(PS )24mwd leu- 76S7 �- WITNESS: PH#.((OS���`(iDATE A q , r TO SOUTHOLD I"OWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R_40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES NOT TO hIF•NTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTLAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICILIRD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE AAAR J Ab v-Yo a t,D /YJELLY f l ar' 7b LIL /30G" !/v .� �,� /,��� �i r� .� .� 7G c/ 81 �S' God L . �. ,- ;�or �, 3- edo7-14 o. 76--v-d 114Z Lg. IA4 � -m I � Spille e SoLa 4rbpr4l 765-�3S? I n i o\-� 7Lo5 3 5 �n o&14J , `eon �o S 5 ou Sk 7615- WITNESS: ! Y PH# ATE AGE#__t? TO SOUTHO�:') TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICH.ARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIANI H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE 3 r- no m L'h,;, Gam; ^ 76S--V y '�Jz no- // .1/�L L' /�SLS spa c.� nl / /l�i3 d' L/� 3171, y fl / o od CV' �S—A, a e el o c,J /�G�z� 143 � c) ,&Y1 ��z 4A � ZC5-1 r7� 5� up zn4i 17 5 ��'S��S l O�v 0013 �, rZAPWu, 1 AiLs :zA —alw,0 - -1 i 3 N 0 0 1 �4 WITNESS: PH# DATE 13�*PAGE#� TO SOUTEOLD TO*WN BOY..- D PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT TIIE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX N1AP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORNIER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS i.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLI.AM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III.AdND WILLIANI H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNA PHONE DATE 6. V16let-o, Co logs 1 awn n 7 W31 �Ls —rl L5�( G ' Ll SgR.cs A. cr gA&i _L " L.�'f PE�'cw'G p"Y o(4 q'l% . ,&tki i � -71 �i. �';!;';�� ;ter � -'� R /e C�/ �` �!7 L .5Cjr�U. n / 067 WITNESS: - PH# DATE '�I�AGE#* TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOA" t , PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES. NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME II ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE 940 e► —SD i� 77 -S P ' 7toS sa8 �g $v 'v.� a- 8/ V-e, u a 196 140 1:4- ArJj E/Z--Ul--i - S S� �'l!4-.,/�/ ILO ��` z�i-Gym_-_.. G J� S O 20 ^r WITNESS: ola - � 0'��-PH# �DATE jl'(o PAGE# � TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE TIIE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. E 1V OULL LIKE TO Y 17HO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES Oi'1 THE FORIi MR LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS i.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAIN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILI,IAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICH.ARD F.MULLEN III CND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND INLAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OL R COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE Y. fi S°xCZE�,v /v /,J C'aPiler �OCcc.rf��c V-/tarn : c/- , s dog z )d�'�-� GDP �� 9 1V L,L' I x' Ada NL �o � E- �z I rk,v ao. l ct n 3 �R , �GG>Oa }l/�� �� yyui ' 7� --l L) 7-7 Z �y. J .K N H fJ nr-R 76.5' - ld 7 z /Z, z / WITNESS: 111,d &i.cc/cry,V PH# DATE Rh Z PAGE# . G� TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (1111)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION OUALITY OF LIFE. AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. UNCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH-NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS I.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM 1I.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS , ' SIGNATURE PHONE DATE 611 oa 219(A 5 "oj la ("/ ') , zaz:� —Wo L-)- if t�k S 1�o MOLD S (R 3 7 Z3 3�� ) � tl Z- S IW I A ZWMt- v ��,3, H�.�e,� W t"r•,o�e i 1 (�� act dart � S` �Dd� s3c�o pRlV•4rE i20�,3 ` - or �-r a &e rr 410 Lowsr LAM l l Nturn�t �-fie- D,4h� w f}1�� Ct�a,L `76,5 . oo j /a �ar, lVal, A A,. LL `R%ITNESS: -4712a a4AA, �" PH# •7(aS-S Y U, DATE ZI L PAGE# 7 Tr- SOUTHOL,D TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1610 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FOP"MER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS I.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLLAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE _ is � .�, •, /� i ` J L /4 a ` #_I ell .) )n -"i7� LLiG C/�CF� - co S GYG 0 , �b lam$ l,awcl �slc a ?- 577--;2 (f W,YIL�reA P,-_rIf7 `o. /30x Lowe( � 'ags- 5641 � 4 /U C F�RoL A<R r; E 3 -7 Y-� 64 koo k�s FN2 feu tt V ` � lV. ►.�4"relct� -4�? l � 2-3-14S-�- +� Frc s �� flue n,z WITNESS: �` PA# / DATE AGE# I TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(11 40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS: IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FOIUMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS i.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE 9 f %c 9 S`y 7-3 7 a edttew -,w Lu 9 2r 90 - S ,b 8 x(tK5 C k Y�— `f707 g13" 29g- 2 3 A 40 LJE�c�t6m -loggrf M g-iN Rw,-n d 2 y 0-46 97 `7- Y G6 1, i >c 47 3' S 3 5 S -�3SF- 5-3 7/ k1ti CID Qf ofA?'-)AA - kktv Cut) K,i/— -1(os -062,(p 0 0- 7 WITNESS: PH# 7�S S �G� DATE AGE# TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ' PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE ADD SAFETY"DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME ANTI) ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMANISUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD R MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLED 1 TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND INLAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET rr PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE 3 5�:. ,� `�-ay, 1��J ';k I4J c L;.,� !� _ 1� ' ' f� �c���•,� 1!; 3e3 3 L" IUL — 1 tit 5t � - �.�- ti, `� 7 7 it I I ���, ��'- � i �-�7'L �t�- 'GCS G• �i� C . _ ��� ii _�-- Y� �Tc- 1 ` 1 •+ f �040i,AS PC?T poll 1r$ "'So ) � / P. � �� S- I )r-,� 7 ,(3 &--°� C(LL I N jssHtf'Ygoeo Ltv i ") i �77 i, ,r Ll WITNESS: Ae, PH# 7l0<=Ste/.%C,DATE / AGE#_,2 _ TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD �— PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED,, . AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND i SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITII OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA TIIE LOCAL PAPERS I.e.TRAVELER WATCHNI AN/SUFFOLK TIMES. TIIIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITII NO MALICE,TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICIIARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICIIARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM II.MULLEN TO PROTECT TIIE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RUPAI, CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE-SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNA PHONE ATR 4/77 r ' 1 pp r � t ) I ( Z l� i (I 1 JAI 'i IA� Sj 57/ �• 1V � �•C� -n � clue �L�� 7�a i- �A Cola. LE akk CP � � een 01�A`/I / Lf'`� -7/o ��lierle �ijreour qlLol,4L�� 17 7-1Yo y77 -Y, lelS (I 777 , � ;"x WITNESS:��-��t�r�i��/�_PI3# "7( �-lo��DATE !���"� •��^7PAGE# TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIALM 11.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (FIB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE. AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTIIING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC ILAZARDS, TACIT NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITII OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE,AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK TIIF,BOARD TO RF rF.CT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WIIO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS i.e.TRAVELER WATCIINJA&/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F. MULLEN III OR WILLLLM If.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE TIIE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RUILIL CIL-kRACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DAZE 7`? a'"1-Z Lo) �. r ST : �+I'�'�11t G' -J ^�CZ i�c c_,' JC.f.i.JC-�._. / / 7- C,\ y� V� y l'7G'tLf -iill/�iV 1�i " S�M" .S/ fa'4�Z?t/�7D� ./ R /r^'iL�.� 77 —a C 6.0 7 / ►'1 Z L �� _� C -7 7 �I�' tr IL To nV-, i c ,/I l t . 4 A,. WITNESS: a_ _e R��J PA# '1(2 �SZ1�f DATE I%l�� AGE# TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ' PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(1140)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERIMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION OUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DAIS ql is 2 i kQiie 250 Od5haxlC -7 Os •t i ; - 1�1� 5 Fl ir-i ca GQi<L- 43c7 C: 5 0Q' 1T LD CA cad' Ell- qL q,9. MAP,0A l 65 E) /al ti h em,r As k r If - l 05 J `- /r - -7, Lo y !ab EnN A. a &o M-'a o cit 4 N f r S-5-�(z to Z� /07 ME LA► l l E Sk&fvRw3) LOCUST L- AJ E —S 5 70�,71L) Nf=6RD LOCUOT LAhr-, —X Lap-4to WITNESS: - PH# 2'4S- -4 a DATE_A, AGE#__6 TOSOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND,INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE 2. �r 3. !'c ►�I r t i G — >/ h 157'V?-3 l�a�.-Y, Joz L�l (�� �1=3y�y Ilk f 477 — ro Ile? 76 1S Jos r pif MAJO 40 tie �. `� I& r,L l z q E rY.4gpIN "din u,� ,y-f a. m ,Q.G(dG"--i C 191 ew t t- -v.Iu lis+c d-. WITNESS: < H# 71 DATE/PAGE# r y TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ' PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS i.e.TRAVELER WATCHMANISUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE aZ �ZZ l; 2 ce-S . �f S1 /�- l hlCs /�, 2�0 AN)C. S i ?CAST Z121 C � t' � � fch� ► c � C�l zZ— 3 tA l/ pJ c u pv 4V, 5 ' / 7�_ )vi Ad WITNESS: PH# S DAT�PAGE# a i j TO'SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS i.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RUP-kL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE �aJ RtM Lam• -1-3 5 r w Pko"AA� ,�,� sow- �Q� _ qLl 77-�r�� z t e 1? �-611 -SILI7 • �O• kab', ILL to / Ll , • `-`'77 -/0/ 3 L, v a6 - r - L I rAl SQ3 hAlr,4to ( 64 - z7i d S�04—c0ca4 a 'y (3 C1(o1 C o ` 66$�S 2 u , IIA14 4 z 1 I M 'r 's � 7S VJ¢st� R� c- :tccA u 73 7Co9S B•1l• 7 WITNESS: gH##� -1wf-M 12, DATE f PAGE# TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (IIB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRIDTINAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE oAIE OT34 t(,T' / % r -7 - , Z Cam' S 9- ✓h-f. g ,i to Zvi 5vv --49-�or Qo 7(0 s f3� y� t r au 1't5s5' SovNd�►acw I7 0 @aft► /l � `7 3`F—S9 -6 7Qfr . R 7-1•fl 5-ic z LC-- - 73 LL -2-0 :G �" El7 - o ZSvvPrZ i E p"i.12- , 35 co ��, so�ldawrl ' (�5� - l E WITNESS: H# 7� I Z f 2- DATE�PAGE# Z �:: TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION ' WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS fHBI AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R 401(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX N1AP 1000-062.00.03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY SE AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESS NOT TO MENTION UALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN.- -A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1610 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS i.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLULM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE Pr _ 7'Pe 4 11 Ine l�l c�'�i 4 Q tU +�. till a .�• �' 3�� (� y; %/� 177 - E C1� Pa. I gJ L G , r7 4 o�C /d 37 g r► cb—7 w�c WITNESS: Q �A a, ,p pg# :Z�5_�Z(,.(� DATE // ?PAGE#_j_ TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ' PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS - SIGNATURE PHONE DAIS 41 a T(-� p, s ^S _v\ Lt-e-4-K 9-4n err-o3�� « 51 ( 7 ool -70 �i 6 --� _--- / it .30 - z. - 8 9 vc Lin ?3 3( rs � J 1741-6� 76 �vL ,LUC1 JAt WITNESS:_ PH# 2&, 57/7_6DATE -,PAGE# �� TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PEW IITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORLIIVIER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD.F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL, CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE .339 a 5 ov;El- 261 S�3G ' 3 �l =7 y y -,?lad 11 / ej rp Ljmac; ee- ,,I rd IC1,Wi wiv 07ary Cf6 ! c /e� f— "ISs 07 Let G a fl I- rcl c evy, lqo OSsec) S 1nAdld cvvo �' / to1 - - V 2/' r W S V c - � �. �6s -�7,23 i1 y WITNESS: PI3# 7�.�.�=�ZIc�6 DATE / PAGE# 3 TO'SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION v^: WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE 114 I'VWO Ox�F,6w 34- 6 t V 7 it. 1 � Coo, ( C P 0 AAa�►+ (o 50 o ti uC l i 1�s=/ �/ II C• o. S o e lh- 0-5 i ar82 / ' O S W rLr- Leme a c)w -� f 6 -7 3 d, i 1 i �l r All LLt I r WITNESS: '71/lz� ' �2_ GT PH# -7 5q--Z6 DATE �� �I' PAGE#__q TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE 1 rrk- G r 'L SL/fir�l 7 J I &00 Lime T\-onclk fqAKq EGWEIV 76G - (/Iq Pe so\,,1 Ave- Rom- - -7G C- 2 I IVo-«,�. 55b n A Ave-. !Cos - z 1 z 9 ik W I% c-Vta\- r- toft e fQ T� 0\1 u� �tT� lc�/ - �` I Yv U l • ^ , U 9 7 8l E�6�o�K�C�� 48 C�jcic!/a��AJr 1?))A-IT WITN SS: -'lnMA'L;Z ,Sr� m J47^( • PH# DA AGE# TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, 'AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM 11.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(11 40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE.TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAiN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE 112d, tea.. . 7;<See-Lac Lf rx-,�kv&--adL 73 ak O 3 - ,Og G �orlb !Q 7a oc<Dc! AVM 101 .( "1 r 7 7'/ W6 i/ 7` 3-2y t, 5 i �d v 44 ALa2i--( Pd tA-,Z�,�7&,rLa- Reed"C,E,--)3 t1-77 2r Ilk 7 tt ,�„ S ,a Bch `�j t95. i O � a �C- r2[:c�7Li t 1 - W •NESS: "'3'Y1�$�i:s �� `b.c �+�� PH# %S-S�% E I PAGE# (¢ I f TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES. NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE 06. ).2h©ro A (JJL,- -L05a s c n a,�OAcytt-L 11 77 `2--3 b of M �js� 3'1� �Uc� ,L S¢. Z-�7'� �'d ZZ I S` o e I ?S (bra A-R- (acre l , ,1;t. 09. i"Yc.: ate, / r �r- / . w r� H6MAl Mcl 7x A 777 Ufa f - a. (/-.laurel G �.;� 13 I�zre ,,�, �iq3 7 3V- 71�Z f �OJ- �►�� �0u'lo 23 t,k- V1'1 4.L L A '(Sb a O L�-J O LC QJ ngTZI, �I l )o s it e WITNESS: PH# 7 (a DATE f 7 PAGE# 7 TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERIMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMANISUFFOLK TRIES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE IN ad qa'-. �3c� �� 7 W7 6— a 95;2c( o-�f,4 , y�j—�3t,L� Vic t3� ti c� -e 5tZ, 7-3 13 5 / ,�� •P z 7G 5 a�6/ /77 7 • , 11 ' 11rC lj ,wfir, pq ., 3 V -t cam. f q-- s j 7 l / ,� ZG51�stA 3vIs' /* i WITNESS: `1� C i- ' PH# l(v€-S4Z�: DATE i PAGE# Y ' TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ` PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(11 40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE- DATE 1 41A u.r� •- -- Z� T � a L4 / _ — 1 Z � < QTM d Ld // gs /s t jj\ ivt a / F - Sip WITNESS: - c� Q PH# °7(oS�.571 DA E �� PAGE# TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD - PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO NIENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMNIUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE Aiue,, roeaa- ')'715 AY,4yw 1j ,A I..- �� 2� 1I�1 /l9.r i nn ����� f blo�=x �. f( {, �1(\ fT ` 1/l�' d�o o c_ie vae 7 Gl ` c(Z 22— V 0 7 3 3G 4 `73 ct k rc� ;eA, vx--v- Sa da o oat- f �! l /7 _ 76 J= 11 q WITNESS: PH#,74�� � DATE4 7PAGE# �� TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (IIB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAIINI H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE ARJZ Po �� 6 1 179H PU±�J LA Q I L la-0 4 0 ifi,( �a , e cAL&I E4-LL 60, / /q7l R; -—Ie_-v r xa 'la j 04464e-l"/ M:iZ/ /P--� 7 (L- 2 lS lom o i e . ,� / 77 9ict . �� pa FO f 9 4-, "- - � 6vh 7 . - ,1 n y7 7—6q 0-. r c -71 Loa 9 - - S 73 Sb /I �iIf 6 Alp v t4 '-� . „ PA# _ � AGE#WITNESS: j� TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX NIAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. i A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FOI;tMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS I.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE r 4-3, Ply;" - �✓ c i �3�-z� R v I Pc� :l 3 y cif ►� Si 3 - ac�l ij 9 7 irootc� 6 130-,t rk3 Lal"r-e /f/ AJ .�I A J1_ c - G j 7 J / 1 l ! 7 q— 7 �` � ��� • to �, � ,• � � �l �e,tia d 1 c- sir s fsrn 4 // C&T-c-h d�4 f WITNESS: PH# 72 i ;;,I,DATE ��� PAGE# lP— TO'SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES. NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE I �AJ, c: rZ C JR;� 11, 7'7 ( v%�ieQ�lZ �i 74 S-�-3k At VIUIQ�t � Sft► PV � (�? t.� U•u�-L LlS-rCD # 4 /' �"ltt-r po i y77-2 sa (Lv 6- C" C t C-7 0 � G '9 G f ICY aL.&-,;I- 4 ; ass �a%✓ ,ed� � 7 WITNESS: PH# (a ����DATE /X O 7 PAGE# /3 TO'SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS. ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE m`Gov,+-� �� �� �� cti e��,�t t G Lv? P'y Gve- e 5� 7IS—X 77 - L25 7r •1 J M/ oaa2g /(g 'noti IV<d�j LH PSI -A)' 2G5Dr1 IWO W -r 1 Q 76; 19 o L - 1791 a,300 l 1 u 3 �dg / WITNESS: -'ltc.,/ PH# 7`S-Ste!Z(r DATE !1 PAGE#_L�L TO'SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ` PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES. NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMANISUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS�j p� SIGNATURE PH'ONNE� 4DAM C, y h Y L a.f4/� 2-4/ " U Z ` ' I. f if ids 0 C" N o 6s - - 3 ► ,ham — S C�,,.� PZ 3 Y- � S / / / oG� ofA'off bf, NY Ado- 1y n' n w J o ( ,, WITNESS: cam, r " PH# �7 fo5-Sif?�Fc DATE Uhl J PAGE# / i TO SOUTHO.LD TOWN BOA1 :.z PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PER-VIITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES. NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS i.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM II.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NANIE ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE ol Qe �i Z-2 ov lb -VOL Or-Gl,� 2-2 3 S-Z � �x ,-7 �. 5 a S 7 �✓NIs rC is�rfs �T ;70 7�a J�'�FGa C�C�� �uJ su/t +.� 7� 7 7 6'Z �`— i� i c; . = iro dab ` -,sdvy r - ,-s tg a4�fl-��al-�&W -e vv- illt/ -71-6 Kose k L c, h - ( I WITNESS: PH# �-,-5-':.$/�DATE /� 9 ' PAGE# IG� TO S lUTHOL D TOWN BOARD ' PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICT'S OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES. NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORDIER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER.VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF \ RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE �r41'� 1�f2,, .t .4E,r �7,�TIlLC.r �_ Z-74. 2L A1/4,/lF IVAM3 ,/UFw S 4�-F� l dc C 3 7 i r. � �►n�� 5r_ I -N-1 iX 3 �'� - %fit. - i/ 9 lv OcAtj -7� � it It i r f / WITNESS: /,, �,,)��PH#_ ?�iS=45— �G,DATE �d ' AGE#--L-I— TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ` PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES. NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORWNIER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AIND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE .�/�ll�`/F�?t /f7.�= ��I.7 f,'�-'G''•�' �� _ �_ram, '-��'�' � - 3CC Ct '—L fLc� �..: ;Z•iv• �'L�,urz1 , -<< .� ����l L c.�o Z � s-- s�'= Tl r.% J�igSLF 97 77 9��G U 2 - s // �, - 3� WITNESS: ew dizw��` J? pip7 .� - DATE �� AGE# �� ` TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES. NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE z �cL�C� /�o� l n s t. j, �� a9� 67 322 l c k . L Po 2,no/i C�u ��f 73 -5 y y v // l l ��S _C399 ►��- l/'/. U ti N,-7 L c vi: C GL i /S' 7% Pic rrr H44- 4 t-^' 1rV1 i Vy 1 / / WITNESS: vPH# 47�--S��4,DATE_"kPAGE#_4? TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ' PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX hiAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERVIITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO NIENTION QUALITY OF LIFE ADD SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION ItiTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE.TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMANISUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.NIULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND VLAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET j PRINT NAME ADDRESS S GNATURE PHONE DA*M All rim ,.ni+ �o.-✓ 32 It ir yA-174Y 6050b Frzs; 77-a7a85�' i� AF�a Sc, e-�-F 5r W► i S G r .c.t' �, G - �0 690 o : 3 Y14- r i% 3 i//�� 1�1a2� .3ae) c - �u � .� �-� yy-J7 ii l i5 orNnt P7 WITNESS: PH- 7&5 �DATE /r AGE# U TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ` PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLLA,AI H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE i� ----- ilw 0.,.; � � �.' I C � G-L �'��..t/ ."1 V a C MIL+-G��L �1-..�t✓ 1�2.U4.�Z1` l��j L J . L is n U -P (4,e 2 P A:. , 4 lfrlP 7 014' �- s s s�c�ti 2 mot. � ✓ WL L)s IJS (i I 1 1 l C, ouc `� Ira Ut $nc:fN a)ICE y 0 l i r-1 w-11- ;2; d WITNESS: `l^n PH# DATE jlbg9, PAGE# �-� TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ` PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAbI H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1630 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMANISUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLLIM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD R MULLEN III AND WILLLA.M H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DA dC"1 kAr rA 11i G,rrlry-Al , r,t L 4/-i n LI Q� 1 Z50 12 -71 G/7 7 )-G r<�, G1 � v.u�-.-.--- y7- -�._ Tie-er l°D �- 0,, , /�:�.�. JrAt C.;:1��c pAtu-. A"` d,7G �1 C� (�1 77 pY�i• ( Y / e Aa 4�� �; u 1\l �; • 1�c it ar` WITNESS: C, Al PH# `7�tiS- I�I�r DATE ���J`= PAGE# 27- TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD " PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TA-Y hIAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1610 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE ANZ ANSWER VLA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHiNfAiNUSUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLL+,:NI H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND M,-kINTAIN THE RUR-kL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET i # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE Dam ' - ✓� 7 %?v Y97 IL , AL 71, LKj Pik I J / ii / LA��' — �Z// / L iv i lc� i� L - ' ► . i a� WITNESS: i.Dz�. ... PH# �IZ,S �.���DATE # PAGE# �� TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD y 4 •+ i PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PEILtiIITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAitiILET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY ACID WERE ANY OF THE.TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD NIULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLL-%,M H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NANfE ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE -Kb bar '3�z ,, r� I 4 -i 3 9d <<T21 �1 L rj ni�/ 5+-11 ST `vim ►S- yI �' S� i( 77� �3a� Jl Lfc, v� S t .1 6 ' G .�. ✓�(.L urn (1 ►� s G i� .�L,O vi , y7 - S U ' !/ - a 72- C rl Pu./3r?X .757, -etl) a' ILd 77 -1-5� -fie N ' WITNESS: PIi# �ln= �G� DATE#OZPAGE# TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX NIAP 1000-062.00-03.00 022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCLI.ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHM VN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLLCM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL, CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE 1 �Z .����%S /Cz�i �a:�C c1�,2�2%L 1�� _�'C�-- _ �r- .�-'_.. � ��,I Z'�� Il •I Ill nhs 3�3 v T ti c�c�, I -- .2 27 442. UR ' Ziy ✓�� �� T1 G/LZ�� l _ I� L,,el-, ;��L,; / C ';'vj �j�� ;< i,y �7 7�7- �l 0 �l 11 H 0 41 U 1 V LI: 'Ili C LGIi/ V��: E'/1 w� 7L> i WITNESS: �% PH- 7C n1 -4 DATE 1 1E AGES tO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD " PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE Ac PLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WIL.LIAM II.MULLEN TO DOWN 7DNF.COLONIAL CORNERS (IIB)AND THE ADJACENT RF.SIDF,NTIAT.PARCEL OF LAND -40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZON L(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONC L TIIE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND NVF.RE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. EVE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS i.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F. MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM 11.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE,VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RI'RAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PE"a I T ION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS f SIGNATURE PHONE DATE Ll ti. i \ 7�//r= �; - 1 ili).i��.G.alo'� ��� ;i: '/✓L`<„(.CwL�i ',1-„l f /G � ��..��q�../�S�� �__.----' )14 4)1 (t C/ 7, •C.L' L v ..'.,c.fy c�: ` cr i 9 r✓t- aV� t 1 v L; 1916 WITNESS:4,D6 - 2,-- ap- PH# DATE AGE#_ram TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE TIIE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM 11.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEI,OF I.,AND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NA,rIE AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE IIOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION IN'PO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE.AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK TIIE BOARD TO RFJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE,TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA TIIE LOCAL PAPERS I.e.TRAVFLE.R WATCII\IAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE.TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE,THE PETITION OF RICIIARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM 11.NIL'LLE,N TO PROTECT THE,VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CILARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE oATF %a Lc-, IL :JT71 �,��r ry y^ ?J J a c v rY7/ S7`• �� ..�.<� �. Y7�` D )� �� /lo Li Z , ��T 4- lj'} • ��lwv`C� C Cti LI-7�- Y b I I AR ci _->`. I r9 ! , 070 �xill' S z % l rj'S% --Al V fil��� �,ry/ �2� 3 y3 ����L� // 47 Jac,'a4 i6 Cr ,, 3/ 77JG1 11/4- tasl(!A P, fa GS�o 5' S Gn -,7 Z r 30 z - Z- i E S 4 !2 c d 7 7 -Ill z( /l WITNESS: r PH# �(15-C�G DATE �! �' PAGER� ' I TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD t ` PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES. NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. _ PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE LtS - 1,`1, MDDi\9t✓j—loE7 .r 1+,1?S W 4%114 tea' ' 01e a , 011 ice,rA oo 13I-Va.waj.� 1 k nn rKe. '-;too }Pc. So,A�- lc1 / 6 TQ ��< ;JQ /,/ /J/�7' oCSv� u�'L(/'�rv� ^l�t' � /l �fi l�J,.x1 !/�-t2� <.ur�ll- '765- [. %;,jz 31 but (v_ cl C o c�.- P,L .�. .J Zl tnt /it WITNESS: `�Qa QrL,,,.'<_ roc PH# 7loL-�z f2(o DATE l 17_ AGE# Z� TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HE)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-30)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMINIERCLAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FOMNIER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VLA THE LOCAL PAPERS i.e.TRAVELER WATCHMANISUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLLA,NI H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND ILAINTAIN THE RUPuL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET PRINT NANI ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE &r�r�� 11'7 -72 �c�co � � �J � v ilk J •�s�� �� 6 c��� A Kt K i L- 11�f � �757 M -70 5! C�Lid I c2ado k1V L�v l WITNESS: H# ATE !I PAGE#_ga_Z TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ` PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO NIENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRA-VELER vVATCH�NL-%aNUSUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO NIALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET ;# PRINT NAME ADDRESS TURF PHONE DATE y t- �� , 70 V,1W VUM' Cam► >� S 7 r6. -i3 7.3 `z G Qe�ti �v vx l6 7 141 - SZ Y� cz tv zias- d+ 134 Lam- ' .. „ Lt�� n M , �alG/� % 2 WITNESS: iI o41,2px► DATE_1lAGE# 3© TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00 022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND INLAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMNIER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHM.ANISUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLLA,NI H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATEV3727`77 e s o _ /1 7 t G 3� l(,a Sv�VS�� Avg hAi'r�rWv - ~ZzL %/�, Ma t' r I .5 0 3 0 u cu-i-ey� wti- o� 11 CI -(, NA 7i.U0 �D ox /sl �rfu J-Z 3 3,92 4f&�- r 5`� t-r 4 �LL �) 9 - 1 D '' fc[7 L sa 1, � J�J?. a rd �j �e - 3 9 11--2 lad 3 sfiqmmem / �3 51-/ WITNESS: DATE PIAGE# TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD - PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMALN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MkLICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIA"M H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAwi H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET 7r PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE 32 3 --3 86 G +jz eJ7)Z�c7C�7 � ' . � .f/ 3� - , l ' c 6 -Z4 o 66>C /I Z �Q� flf -� -0/6 (0zi ma# r s 8 - -A Ixu-zpfell Z l ZS Ul�2S I�� % (il i 3 r �i J Wal A&rf-sCA hoie C)d/5q � < - 7 WITNESS DATE if '7yAGE# � TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERIMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. AVE WOULD LIKE TO ICNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS Le.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLL"'v1 H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. - PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET i m PRINT NAME ADDRESS IGNATURE PHONE DATE rj 4 c _ �r7A9T ' c4 ,s4110 r �I— Ii Ov ac,X L inr L� ,� 2y�- ��� 11 • � 1-,- Lie v t � 2AJJZM:� U V) SiL " 7 / �� - C 0 L, R ,Qi1il r 9.7 (� L r a� e I WITNESS: t -PH,-,. DATE II z �/ PAGE#_ ` TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ` PETITION rvE TIIF.UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK TIIE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM 11.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL,CORNERS (III)AND TIIE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL,QF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSI,NIiSS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERNII7'TED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE. AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIF(. AV1) SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN TILIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACPIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITII OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL.PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS I.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICIIARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIANI H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICIIARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIA,M 1I.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN TILE RURAL CILARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE D•+' sk 6 1+ Uh 4Q AC4. r L�v5'A P� L PL (J[1-f w R u � �6 65 ., ////Zl llos ,L m,o'/ / Pp. a lu �dorrd 1. ' 70 �d �S�'S o' n IYi �� .r Z- S'� )6 j- .S� 1 n �olS (,L)+cic v WITNESS: _ PH# DATE �? �?�PAGE#� . J' l TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM 11.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (FIB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE. AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1610 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA TIIE LOCAL PAPERS I.e.TRAVELER WATCHNIAMSUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM 11.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN TIIE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE s ✓ r 5 -72 1 579 I, !TiLl M5 p A(- 5" LLM 5 �4 I l r< � r sw Amy F ;A .570 e -f S klf!'{ 4 jV7*-i , C-g T x- C ��(ram < < I \ i 3�50 �3►2�1 G N U oS �I.��,L E J'�-t- o ail�s ' 11 i► Z WITNESS:��?i! PH# DATE I �7� �� PAGE# 3� r TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD v T PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM II.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (HB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE. AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS I.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM II.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE l,rvY� ti _ P,f6 I/` y IL 9 ................. ... nev 59 Jose � ,� Re.,1 a, Jc fob /3 it lV 11-" 6�3 c�x:5=3�•�F��nxn 22�5 I��r�ci�ee.��i�. �u�(�2�1a � ti\9�11 '7�5- 190`z3 ti( ?z� s'J � - WITNESS: ..?>0 7e PIS#��:5�9 ATE_ f • �' AGE#-12 TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM II.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (JIB)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT TIIE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF I, FF. AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE TILE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH-NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA TIIE LOCAL PAPERS I.e.TRAVELER WATCHMANISUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR WILLIAM H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN TIIE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR CONIMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DA-M Ito t e� o� f,0J3,1S. 5 Wig' i� �[ � ✓ ALA �� �/, - � -�• •-�Z��l ' Woe b17 L°r�ifE /AS l4 j . �Gov�v , - , 7 - 2 "Az C olt? `.��6 e _( kLll; �- _ 3 �. WITNESS: H# , DATE �� AGE#s 4 TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE.BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM 11.MULLEN TO DOWN 70NE COLONIAL CORNERS [11B)AND THE A.D.JAC'FNT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL. OF I:ANI)(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TA-X�lNIAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENL•PuL BUSINESS 7.c)V}:(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY D1,F•.TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE,TIIE,PROI'ERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTIIING CAN.kND AIAY 11APPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, VIGIL NOISE 1NFILACT(ONS, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS ITAS A GOOD NA,ITE AND ENOUGTI VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARF HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES LS NOT I:N KEEPING W1TEI OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL,PROPERTIES. WE ASK TIIE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. 1VE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORI7,I:D TIIE;CUTTING OF THE TREES ON'THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERT\' AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA THL: LOCAL PAPERS I.e.TRAVELER W,ITCITIIAN!SI'FFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE,TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLIilu III OR WILLIAM 11.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE:PETITION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM lI.AIT;I,I.FN TO PROTECT THE.VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND 1I:IINTAIN TIIE REiRAL CIIARACI'ER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET _ # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DA'E •A-0 C,• /b4v—( YYU�u�2m�' d•'t':ic �� .i oiv r c' CP ! ���- �. 'C'� !l;- ZL F(2, 2 OY11 �L dq 12 jo zf - i all (`'� A �?� 2—� rZ� o i� ►Z. S r+ o - u 76 J WITNESS: PH#-7 � DATE O AGE#__�j TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ' T PETITION WE THE.UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM H.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS film AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LA`�D(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TA.\MAP 101)0-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001"TO A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE ENTFGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND IIUSINESSES. NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFT: AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE;THE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COAILNIERCLIL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC IIAZARDS, HIGH NOISE. INFRACTIONS. AND INVASION OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NA,1IE AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES 1S NOT IN KEEPING WITII OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WF.WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED]'HE CUTTING OF THE TREES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER VIA TIIE LOCAL PAPERS I.e.TRAVELER W'ATCHNIANISUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH.NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.11IULLEN III Oil W'ILLIAM 11.MULLEN..THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE THE.PETITION OF RICHARD F.,NIULLEN III AND WILLIAM II.MULLEN TO PROTECT TIIE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND�LVNT AIN THE RUIL11: CHARACTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET _ # PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PHONE DATE G)S/� J�•1'LS U G'�, sr/�/JAG (.x J ?!/ ft }" (7C, 02(, N,�4- j a/c., f r ! �';w�i� �s"i; j�-e-1ll�+,r '�i�� c l(off 4:. `2o I(bq 42 1� Ym -6 N h7 - o3 L, w ,&r c /g r tit Cefoo WITNESS: DATE SAGE#_�U 1. '1 TO SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, AS RESIDENTS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM 11.MULLEN TO DOWN ZONE COLONIAL CORNERS (11B)AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL OF LAND(R-40)(DESIGNATED ON SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-062.00-03.00-022.001 AND 024.001)TO A GENERAL BUSINESS 'LONE(B)FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THEIR PARKING AND STORAGE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS,A CAR DEALERSHIP OR ANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO EXPAND INTO HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY AND VALUE OF IMMEDIATE AND SURROUNDING HOMES AND BUSINESSES, NOT TO MENTION QUALITY OF LIFE AND SAFETY DUE TO INCREASED USAGE. ONCE TILE PROPERTY IS DOWNGRADED ANYTHING CAN AND MAY HAPPEN. A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS SETTING. IT CREATES TRAFFIC HAZARDS, HIGH NOISE INFRACTIONS, AND INVASION•OF PRIVACY INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. MULLEN MOTORS HAS A GOOD NAME AND ENOUGH VISIBILITY AS THINGS ARE. HOWEVER, FURTHER COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO SAID SITES IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH OUR BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC 1640 VILLAGE AND OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. WE ASK THE BOARD TO REJECT THIS APPLICATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO AUTHORIZED THE CUTTING OF THE REES ON THE FORMER LUCEY PROPERTY AND WERE ANY OF THE TREES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WE THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE.AN ANSWER VIA THE LOCAL PAPERS I.e.TRAVELER WATCHMAN/SUFFOLK TIMES. THIS PETITION IS GENERATED WITH NO MALICE TOWARD MULLEN MOTORS INC., RICHARD F.MULLEN III OR NVILLIAINI H.MULLEN. THIS PETITION IS ONLY IN RESPONSE TO OUR GIVEN RIGHT BY LAW TO OPPOSE TIIE PETITION OF F.ICIIARD F.MULLEN III AND WILLIAM 11.NIULLEN TO PROTECT THE VALUES OF PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN TILE RUR.\L CH:ULItCTER OF OUR COMMUNITY. PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET # PRIM'NAME ADDRESS ) SIGNATURE PHONE DATE � � �y �� 3 it _ eGt `r l�o� ll Ivvw oj:up 2-ar T '~3 j .1, G l�ld�lJFZ1` +-7-7-1 toC�S :r,22i tP' 49 Lf 1 way-, K 91 (/6� 0 �7 ��%�����. ✓ Duct J«cJ � _k � � r¢�j�� onna . F 11 S Ce '� �"2 ... WITNESS Cam►t- �L�12�(�Li`LPH# ED_ BAT'.:S-�_��,A:,r.#� U CAROLYN A. ZENK ATTORNEY AT LAW 121 Ponquogue Avenue Hampton Bays, New York 11946 516-723-2341 Southold Town Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 June 29th, 1998 RE: Super majority or five votes from the Southold Town Board are now needed to change the zone on the Mullen Motors parcel pursuant to the authority vested in Town Law section 265 and a properly executed protest petition. Dear Members of the Southold Town Board, I represent a number of Southold residents who own property or reside near the Mullen Motors car dealership. As you know, Richard and William Mullen applied for a change of zone from hamlet business and residential to general business, allegedly to expand their parking. Numerous residents have respectfully requested that the Town Board not down zone this neighborhood to allow for the expansion of the Mullen Motors car dealership and have submitted a petition to that effect under separate cover. Enclosed you will find a protest petition made pursuant to Town Law section 265 . Town Law section 265 changes the usual. requirement for a change of zone from a mere majority of a town board to a super majority. once a properly executed protest petition is filed in the Town of Southold, five affirmative votes of the Town Board rather than merely four would be needed to change the zone on the Mullen property. Enclosed, you will also find an affidavit from Marc E. Charest, a licensed land surveyor, which proves that the prerequisites of the Town Law section 265 have been met as well as an illustrative map. Thus, the Town Board must now have five affirmative votes, rather than four to effect a change of zone on the Mullen Motors parcel. Abstentions would not count toward same. Town Law section 265 requires either the signatures of the owners of 20% of the land within 100 feet of the area proposed for a zone change, or the signatures of the owners of 20% of the land located directly opposite the land proposed for a zone change and located 100 feet from the street frontage to effect a change in the votes required. page 2 Specifically, Town Law section 265 provides: 1. Such regulations, restrictions and boundaries may from time to time be amended. Such amendment shall be effected by a simple majority vote of the town board, except that any such amendment shall require the approval of at least three-fourths of the members of the town board in the event such amendment is the subject of a written protest, presented to the town board and signed by: (b) the owners of twenty percent or more of the area of land immediately adjacent to that land included in such proposed change, extending one hundred feet therefrom; or (c) the owners of twenty percent or more of the area of land directly opposite thereto, extending one hundred feet from the street frontage of such opposite land. (Emphasis added) . The commentaries by Terry Rice contained in McKinney's explains, A proposed amendment to a zoning law possesses the potential of affecting property owners in the immediate vicinity to a greater degree than the community at large. Consequently, section 265 (1) provides for the filing of a protest petition which requires approval of a zoning amendment by more than a simple majority of the town board, that is, by the affirmative vote of three-fourths of the members of a town board. The purpose of the greater than majority vote is to provide additional protection to those property owners who would be most affected by a zoning change. . .Determining the validity of a protest petition involves a computation of the total area of land, the owners of which are eligible to sign a protest petition and, second, an assessment of the percentage of the applicable area represented by the signers of a petition. . .the second and third categories require a computation of the area within a 100 foot perimeter adjacent to or across the street from such property. Although those computations generally also are relatively simple, specific, peculiar scenarios may raise difficult factual issues. For example, the area of land lying in the street immediately adjacent to land which is the subject of a proposed zoning amendment has been excluded in calculating the total area immediately adjacent to the property. See Biedermann v. Town of Orangetown, 125 A.D.2d 465, 509 N.Y.S.2d 394 (2d Dept. 1986) . p 56 and 57. (Emphasis added) . For an illustration, of how the calculation is made, your counsel may wish to consult Iannarone v Town Board of the Town of Hempstead, 59 Misc. 2d 212, 298 N.Y.S.2d 350 at pages 352 and 353. For additional information regarding Town Law section 265, counsel may also wish to consult Hey v. Town Board of the Town of Potter, 117 A.D.2d 989, which holds that a three to one vote, (where a board had five members) with one member abstaining was not enough to pass a zoning amendment where page 3 a proper protest petition had been filed. Note that abstentions cut against rather than for a zoning amendment. In an Informal Opinion No. 85-6 of the Attorney General, the Attorney General determined that where a municipality consisted of seven members, and a protest petition was properly executed pursuant to Village law section 7-708 ( 1) , which is similar to Town Law section 265, six affirmative votes of the board was required for the zone change. The Attorney General reasoned thus, Since your board of trustees has seven members, it is required that action be taken by three-fourths of the "whole number" of the board (Village Law, section 7-708 ( 1) ; General Construction Law section 41) Three fourths of your seven member board comes to 5 .25, thus requiring the vote of at least six members to take action on a proposed zoning change. p. 66 of opinion. Since your board consists of six members and a three quarters vote of the board is necessary for a change of zone comes to 4.5, four affirmative votes are insufficient to constitute the super majority needed. As confirmed by your counsel during the week of April 6th, five votes are necessary when an appropriate petition is filed. As I explained in a legal affirmation submitted September 29th, 1997, the proposed down zoning is unnecessary and will down-grade this neighborhood. The zone change is unnecessary because the purported goal of the Mullens' is to accommodate additional parking. From this perspective, the zone change is excessive because it would not only permit a parking lot, but numerous undesirable uses "as of right" or by special exception, including fast food restaurants, gas stations, car washes, and industrial uses among others. It constitutes the proverbial "overkill. " As the Group for the South Fork's General Counsel, a leading East End environmental protection and planning organization, I have worked extensively in the Towns of East Hampton, Southampton, and Shelter Island since 1980. I have served as a professional Land Use Planner for five years. I am acquainted with the Comprehensive Plans of these three towns and the South Fork villages. Many of these municipalities have come to realize that a quaint, rural atmosphere, consisting of modestly-scaled, charming, pedestrian-oriented businesses, is fundamental not only to a high quality of life for residents, but to small business owners who depend upon a tourist-based economy for their income. It is abundantly clear that given the abundance, location, ,and overwhelming size of "up-island" businesses, that the only way that East End businesses can draw business and compete is to offer what the western areas of Long Island cannot-small town charm. page 4 An expansion of Mullen Motors, a highly commercial, automobile- centered business is at odds with sound planning and the environmental and business interests of Southold. We have confidence that the Town Board can find more imaginative, less destructive means to accommodate the Mullen's need for parking than contributing to destructive commercial sprawl in hamlet centers and residential neighborhoods. Sprawling parking lots, with bright flood lights that disturb residents and reduce property values, have no place in historic Southold. Please confer with counsel regarding the impact of this protest petition upon any vote taken by the Town Board with respect to the Mullen Motors change of zone application. Thank you for your consideration in this matter which .is of utmost importance to my clients, as well as to the community at large. Sincerely, Caroly A. nk Attorney at aw cc: Town Clerk Southold Town Attorney Planning Board The Zoning Committee Nelson, Pope, and Voorhis Adam Grossman, Esq. PROTEST PETITION REQUIRING A SUPER MAJORITY FOR MULLEN CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION WHEREAS, Town Law, section 265, mandates that upon the presentation of a properly executed protest petition, the vote required for a zoning amendment changes from a simple majority of the Town Board to a super majority; WHEREAS, Town Law section 265( 1) provides: Such regulations, restrictions and boundaries may from time to time be amended. Such amendment shall be effected by a simple majority vote of the town board, except that any such amendment shall require the approval of at least three-fourths of the members of the town board in the event such amendment is the subject of a written protest, presented to the town board and signed by: (b) the owners of twenty percent or more of the area of land immediately adjacent to that land included in such proposed change, extending one hundred feet therefrom; or (c) the owners of twenty percent or more of the area of land directly opposite thereto, extending one hundred feet from the street frontage of such opposite land. (Emphasis added) ; WHEREAS, William and Richard Mullen have petitioned the Town Board for a change of zone for a 1.25 acre parcel in the hamlet of Southold, located at the southwest corner of NYS Route 25 and Locust Lane, from Hamlet Business and Residential to General Business, in order to expand the Mullen Motors car dealership; WHEREAS, this change would allow inappropriate, overly commercial uses in this neighborhood including fast food restaurants like 7-11, Arbys, and McDonalds(SE) , warehouses(P) , gas stations (SE) , car washes (SE) , bars (SE) , wholesale beverage distributors(P) , and industrial uses; WHEREAS, the existing residential zoning category is less impactful, allowing such uses as farms(P) , horse farms(P) , churches(SE) , and residences, and the hamlet business zone also allows less impactful commercial uses, both of which are more consistent with the downtown charm of Southold and less destructive of existing small businesses, many of which depend upon rural charm to be successful; WHEREAS, the zone change is unnecessary in that the alleged problem experienced by Mullen Motors is a parking problem-which could be solved through more imaginative solutions than a down zoning; WHEREAS, the undersigned are all. property owners within 100 feet of the area proposed for the zone change: WHEREAS, the undersigned collectively own more than 20% of the land immediately adjacent to the land ,included in the proposed zoning change; page 2 of 2 of PETITION WHEREAS, three fourths, or 75% of the six member Southold Town Board would be 4. 5, and 4 votes would not constitute the super majority needed; THEREFORE, we the undersigned protest the change of zone, and by law, five affirmative votes in favor of the proposed change of zone, rather than four are now required as the result of filing this protest petition with the Town Board: NAME: (Print) ADDRESS: SIGNATURE: lL ��2q � ��ipn?5 ��5Ca7Ti9� P�Ge , S'ZC26s-,uy 3 O LD W sr IAIJ G i DA'lfl� /e . S ZC2CS� ✓� © L.f� DUST L/+n/C l�.4� {�R-� f'E• riZt—i�EfZI.�I� 3 T-r"G PL. (n5 LoC05T LANE DCBRA. So-ro 5 US LANs ANT-How oT0 . R l T-A C'0 S TT--:(.C-a C c>w F- 0 TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ---------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of William and Richard Mullen's Change of Zone Application from Hamlet Business and Residential to General Business AFFIDAVIT MARC E. CHAREST ---------------------------------------------------- State of New York) )ss: County of Suffolk) Marc- E. Charest, . being duly sworn, deposes - and says: 1. I am a land surveyor, licensed in the State of New York. My New York State license number is 050149., 1 own Northstar Surveying, P.C. located at 94. West Montauk Highway, Hampton Bays, New York 11946 . My phone number is 516-728-5330. 2. I make this affidavit in support of a protest petition regarding Mullen Motors made pursuant to . Town ,Law section 265. Town Law section 265 changes the number of votes needed to change the zone on a piece of property in New York State from a majority of town board members to a super majority. 3. Richard Mullen and William Mullen applied to the Southold Town Board to change the zoning on a piece of property located on the southwest corner of NYS Route 25 and Locust Lane from Hamlet Business and Residential to General Business, in order to expand the Mullen Motors car dealership. Adjoining property owners protested. 4. Ordinarily, a .majority of the six member Town Board would be needed to change the zone on the property, which would be four affirmative votes. However, a properly executed petition under Town Law section 26.5 changes the vote required to a super majority. Thus, five affirmative votes would be needed from the Town Board, not four, to change the zone. 5. I have been retained by a number of Southold residents who own property in the vicinity of the Mullen Motors car dealership to ascertain whether the requirements for Town Law section. 265 have been met. 6. I have fifteen years experience surveying residential and commercial properties for both public and -private .clients in. the County of Suffolk. As a licensed land surveyor., my duties include, among other things, determining the. location of property boundaries, the area of properties, and calculations derived therefrom. Thus, I am qualified to ascertain whether Town Law section 265 has been met. 7. I am familiar with the subject site in question. I am. also familiar with the provisions of the Town Law section 265. Town Law. section 265 specifically provides: . Such (zoning) regulations, . restrictions and boundaries may from . time to -time be amended. Such amendment shall be effected by a simple majority vote of the town board, except that any such. amendment shall require the approval of. at . least .three—fourths of the members of the town board in the event such amendment is the subject of a written protest, presented to the town board and signed by: (b) the owners of twenty percent or more of the area of land immediately adjacent to that land included in such proposed change, extending one hundred feet therefrom; or (c) the owners of twenty percent or more of the area of land directly opposite thereto, extending one hundred feet from the street frontage of such opposite land. (Emphasis added) ; 8. I have reviewed the protest petition entitled, ".PROTEST PETITION REQUIRING A SUPER MAJORITY FOR MULLEN CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION. " This petition. was signed. by Doris Zito, 295 Locust Lane, Barbara J. Adams, 315 Cottage Place, Janice J. Szczesny 340 Locust Lane, David R. Szczeny, 340 Locust Lane, Richard H. Frederick, 3.85 Cottage Place, Debra Soto, 165 Locust Lane, Anthony Soto, 165 Locust Lane, Rita Costello Cohen, 56655 Main Road, and Albert Cohen, 56655 Main Road, nearby residents. 9. I have located the property of the petitioners. by tax map and calculated the areas of their properties in relation to Town. Law . section 265 to determine whether or not .the . requirements for Town- Law section 265 are :met. 'Depending upon the interpretation of .Town .Law section 265, lot number 17 may or may not be- included. I have calculated lot areas, including lot 17 and excluding lot 17. My conclusions are as follows. 10. Under Town Law 265 (b) , 'the calculation -of, the percentage of land of those "immediately adjacent". land .owners that protested and '. that lies within a 100 - foot radius of the- proposed .rezoning, including lot '17, is 36. 7% This is greater than the. 20% required. That . . calculation was derived by calculating the total area within the, 100 . . . foot radius of the property that is subject to the rezoning, which is 62,471 square feet; then calculating the total lot area contained in the lots of immediately adjacent property owners who are protesting (Lots 17, 18, and 26 ) which is 22, 943 square feet; and finally calculating.-what percentage 22, 943 is of 62, 471, which is 36. 7% . The first test under Town Law section 265 (b) is met. Thus; a three fourth or super majority or five votes of the Town Board is- now required to change the zone. 11. Assuming that lot 17 is not included in. the term "immediately adjacent" , 30.4% of the lot area. of "immediately adjacent" land owners is within 100 feet. This - exceeds. the 20% figure required. Thus, the test is met again. That calculation was derived as .follows. First the total area within the 10.0 foot radius surrounding the• area proposed fora zone change was calculated at 56, 775 square feet. Then the total area of -land for those who signed the protest petition was calculated (lots 18 and 26) at 17, 247 square feet. Then', it .was determined what percentage 17,247 was o.f 56, 775, which. is- 30-.4%. This exceeds the 20% figure required. Thus, the first test under Town Law section 265 (b) would be .met. Once again, a three , fourth majority or five .votes of the Town Board is now .required to change the zone. 12. Under Town Law section 265 (c) , the calculation of the area of land for those who signed the protest petition who are "directly opposite" the property proposed to be .rezoned is 31. 1% which. is in. excess of the 20% needed for a proper protest petition. That figure was derived as follows. First the total area within the 100 foot radius of land opposite the subject site was calculated, which is 70,392 square feet. Then, the total area of land owned by property owners who signed the protest petition and were directly opposite the land to be rezoned was calculated including lots 15, 35, and 36 which was 21,890 square feet. Then, it was determined what percentage 21, 890 was of 70, 392, which is 31. 10. 13. As shown in the above calculation, Town Law section 265 (c) is met. As such, a three-fourths majority of the Town Board members, which would be 5, is required to change the zone. 14. In summary, both tests for compelling a -three-fourths majority of the Town- Board to change the zone for .Mullen Motors are met. Five affirmative votes of the Town Board are now needed to change the zone. Abstentions do not count toward this figure. A certain map entitled; "Radius Map of Property Surrounding Mullen Property Showing Areas of Lots to Compel a Super Majority" dated June 18th, 1998 prepared by Northstar Surveying, PC is made a part hereof for illustration purposes. Respectfully Submitted, Marc E.. Charest, LS . Sworn to before me this - day of June, 1998. Notary Public FRANKUN D.BUTZ NOTARY PUBLIC,State of NewY No.52450tNr c-`t GSu 1 )lo f Qualified in Suffolk Countycr Commission Expires 30.1 NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC 1 ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING Jim II CHARLES J.VOORHIS,CEP,AICP•ARTHUR J.KOERBER,RE.•VINCENT G.DONNELLY,P.E. •VICTOR BERT,P.E.•JOSEPH R.EPIFANIA,RE.-ROBERT G.NELSON,JR,P.E. •CHRISTOPHER W ROBINSON E P 4 faF7n May24, 1999 �f '� v �I�F� 5mf� ark L;s [ �I1 I" r1C I0H .,.�� - .RECEIVED - Ms. Betty Neville, Town Clerk ; _ =r> Southold.Town Board MAY 26 1999 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road MAY 2 19�9 PO Box 1179 . Southold Town Clerk -1-iold Town Southold,New York 11971 l�iasab�vi� Bcar6 Re: Review of EAF Part III Richard F. Mullen III and William Mullen Zone Change Application SCTM No. 1000-62-03-223 & 24.1 NP&V Job No. 97208 .Dear Ms. Neville: As per the request of the Southold Town Board-, (as SEQRA-designated Lead Agency) we:have completed a review of the above-referenced document. This-review-is..,iritended` to: 1) examine-the EAF Part III:for completeness with respect to the-items presented in the September 10, 199$review (attached); 2) comment on the responses,provided by the Applicant, and; 3) provide recommendations to'the'Board regarding-environinental.issues and compliance. It should be rioted that as this application.'lids been classified as .a Type I action, a Conditioned Negative Declaration (CND). is not allowed., That is, it is not possible for the. Lead Agency to issue a Negative Declaration on. the application, 'with' an. accompa- i * 'list of conditions.which-the Applicant must first satisfy. As a result,.only a Negative Declaration or.Positive Declaration is.allowed. 'I'he:EAF Fart.III_.gerierally addresses-those::itein�.'referenoed 'in the September Tq, 1998: correspondence from this office"with':respect to:.visual impacts; cutting:t�f trees on the property, land use conflicts.and.traffic.. However, the document leaves some questions incompletely addressed in regard to,growth-inducing aspects, traffic .(parking); and aesthetic impacts-(lighting). The traffic engineering examination prepared.for the EAF Part III by Dunn Engineering . Associates P.C. clearly demonstrates that the.Mullen Motors dealership has a deficit of parking._The on-site:parking supply occasionally does,not.meet the demand for.customer . and.employee parking, vehicle storage and cars stored prior to servicing: The study indicates that there;:are times when' vehicles are parked on the adjacent site.- Increasing on-site parking will;address thisexisting demand. There.is no•increase in.the parking demand and no additional out storage and. ales area as a.result.of.this'application. J 672 WAL'T WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILFLBE. NAX GY� 1B,427_6820 -2186 f51B] 427-6 'B BIS Mullen Motors EAF Part III Review NP&V No.97208 After review of the balance of the EAF Part III provided by the Applicant, this office recommends that acceptance of the document be"held in abeyance pending provision of additional details.in the below-listed areas. The reviewer acknowledges the effort taken by and on the.behalf of the Applicant to provide the Lead Agency with specific information in regard to the planned project, as well'as to-provide mitigation measures,- which will alleviate impacts. However, in consideration of the quality of life issues involved in this application, we recommend that the Board consider obtaining;specific details in certain matters, as follows: • What, if anything, is the Applicant.planning to do about the reduction in •parking space available for Colonial Comer patrons? At,present, the lot to be converted to Mullen Motors parking is presently used for overflow parking for Colonial Comers, as Colonial corners has insufficient parking. • Specify the planned height of.the new lighting poles, as well as any design or operation measures taken in, this matter which would reduce or eliminate-potential impacts to the adjacent residences from fugitive lighting: (e.g., reduced lighting intensity, reduced number of lighting fixtures, reduced hours of lighting, shrouds, reoriented lighting.direction). • Specify the minimum height ancUor diameter at,breast height (dbh) for the 5 new, street trees on Locust Avenue,to replace-the 5 large trees that were cut•down. , • Is the.Applicant willing to agree to a number'of.Covenants and Restrictions (C&R'.$) in.regard to the traffic and operation of the,-facility? If so, following are suggested C&R's:' 1. No access.to Locust Avenue from the.new parking lot. 2.- No Certificate' of Occupancy .for the new parking lot until all landscaping, lighting,drainage systems,etc. are completed,for both parking lots. 3. Cessation'.of the existing auto storage, .parking, and outdoor repair work.along west side of the Mullen Motors building'. '. 4- No test driving by.Mullen employees on_residential side streets in the vicinity. . 5. Ne.paz ctng;. ilaadir�g�'loadinb or. ise of side streets n.the vicinity`by truci s related to Mullen Motors. 6. Limitations on the hours when, such,deliveries are allowed, to 8AM-5PM; weekdays. ; To provide additional parking mitigation in.the,,vicinity, 'and to further protect the "rural feel" of.the Town*.the Town could install "No Parking".signs on Cottage Place along the Mullen Motors property; as well as on the south-side of Main;Road along the frontage of _,site. In regard to the potential for impact if.the'Colon' ial Corners•site is-redeveloped, the EAF Part III states: The applicant acknowledges,that there has been' speculation that Mullen Motors' intention is to expand onto the.Colohial Corners property:- However,;Mullen Motors has .-., Page 2 Mullen Motors EAF Part III Review NP&V No.97208 no current plans for expansion. If, at sometime in the future, business. demands were such that an expansion was contemplated, the applicant would be required to file the appropriate applications with the Town of Southold and would be subject to environmental review pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 6127. As indicated in The SEQRA Handbook (NYSDEC 1992, page 22), review of the impacts of future actions are not required if such actions are speculative, may not occur, and are functionally independent of each other(pg. 22); The Applicant is not contemplating redevelopment of the Colonial Corners site at this time. When.and if'such action is taken, the required application would be based upon'a specific Site Plan and would require a separate, full review under SEQRA. As a CND is not an option, the proposed C&R's must be incorporated into-the. actual project; �if a Negative Declaration is.to be supported. In this.way, the concerns of the community will be addressed; while the community and Applicant will benefit from the improved operations on the project site. The project will, address the current insufficiency of parking on. the adjacent Mullen- 'Motors property,:while the proposed,landscaping and, prohibition of access.'to Locust Avenue will mitigate aesthetic impacts for- the-adjacent and. nearby :residences.. If implemented.in.conformance with Town-standards, and the accompanying C&W s, the proposed lighting would not signif cantly impact the adjacent residences.; Therefore, the proposed-project is not anticipated to'result in significant adverse environmental impacts, 'and'-in fad..would represent a significant-.improvement in 'the overall environmental quality of the operation now present on the site. If there are.any new or unsatisfied,concerns.of the.Town Board; the-option to issue a Positive Declaration remains, followed by the preparation of a Draft EIS. However, as, indicated above,the EAF Part III adequately addresses the majority of the environmental and planning. concerns of the Town,-requiring;only a small amount of specificity-in regard to certain issues to`be'deemed complete. : Please advise if-you. wish. further. assistanceJn.the preparation of a Determination of Significance. Thank-you for-the opportunity to.provide you.with this'review,..and please call if.you have'any.questions. t Very truly yours, N oN C arles J oorhis, CEP -AICP att Page 3 o��SUFFO(,�co ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE ='Z' °yam, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK o '� P.O. Box 1179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS v. r? Southold, New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER • �� Fax(516) 765-6145 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER �f0� ��� Telephone (516) 765-1800 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 12, 1999 Stephen R. Angel, Esq. Esseks, Hefter S Angel Counselors At Law 108 East Main Street Post Office Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 Dear Mr. Angel: ' In accordance with Chapter 44, Environmental Quality Review, of the Code of the Town of Southold, the Town Board has engaged the services of Nelson, Pope, & Voorhis Consultants to review the EAF Part III submitted by you on behalf of Richard F. Mullen, III and William Mullen with respect to their petition for a change of zone. The cost of this review is $1,400.00 and must be paid prior to the consultant commencing their work. Please send a check in the amount of $1,400.00, payable to the Southold Town Clerk, at your earliest convenience so we may proceed, with processing the petition. Very truly yours, Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk Enclosures 1PP� JEAN N W. COCHRAN �uFF Off® C®G Supervisor GREGORY F.YAKABOSKI TOWN ATTORNEY ® < Town Hall, 53095 Main Road C* Z P.O. Box 1179 �y • �� Southold, New York 11971 Telephone(516) 765-1889 Fax(516) 765-1823 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: BOB KASSNER,PLANNING FROM: GREGORY F. YAKABOSKI,ESQ., TOWN ATTORNEY I� MARY C.WILSON, ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY DATE: MAY 18, 1999 RE: MULLEN REZONING: PLANNING BD RECOMMENDATIONS I spoke with Betty Neville and I reviewed the clerk's file on the above and there is no Planning Board report or recommendation on the Mullen rezoning in the file. As you suggested, this application could be placed on the work session agenda for next week. Enclosed you will find the EAF Part III performed by Mr. Mullen's consultants and related correspondence which may helpful in the review if not already in possession of the Planning Department. Kindly note that the Part III EAF is our only copy. Thank you for you help with this matter. MAY 19 1995 Southold Town Planning Board 0 lA1 N PART III-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM RICHARD F. MULLEN III AND WILLIAM MULLEN MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Prepared for: Messrs. Richard F. Mullen III and William Mullen c/o Esseks,Hefter&Angel 108 East Main Street Riverhead, New York 11901 Prepared by: Freudenthal&Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. 368 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack,New York 11725 (516) 499-2222 Py� Aril 1999 P MAY 2 7 1999 Southold Town RECEIVED Planning Board APR 2 3 1999 Sot"d Town Clerk L PART III-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM RICHARD F. MULLEN III AND WILLIAM MULLEN MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PROJECT LOCATION: . Approximately 1.2484 acre parcel Southwest corner of Main Road(NYS Rt. 25) and Locust Avenue, Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York APPLICANT: Messrs. Richard F. Mullen III and William Mullen c/o Esseks,Hefter&Angel 108 East Main Street Riverhead,New York 11901 Contact: Stephen R. Angel, Esq. (516) 369-1700 LEAD AGENCY: Town Board of the Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Contact: Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk (516) 765-1800 PREPARER& CONTACT: This Part 111 Environmental Assessment Form was prepared by: Freudenthal&Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. 368 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack,New York 11725 Contact: Theresa Elkowitz (516)499-2222 and Araiys Design, L.A.,P.C. 33 Main Street Southampton,New York 11968 and Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach,New York 11978 DATE OF PREPARATION: April 1999 ti PART III-LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM RICHARD F. MULLEN III AND WILLIAM MULLEN MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK Table of Contents Rage Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Project Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Land Use Conflicts and Growth Inducing Impacts within the Area . . . . . 8 Visual Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Cutting of Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Traffic Impacts . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Aesthetic and Noise Impacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Figure 1 - Site Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Appendix A- Proposed Site Plan Appendix B - September 10, 1997 Correspondence from Nelson,Pope&Voorhis,LLC Appendix C- Photographs Appendix D - Renderings Appendix E- Traffic Study INTRODUCTION This document is a Part III - Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) that has been prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with the proposed change of zone of a 1.2484 acre parcel from Hamlet Business (HB) and Low Density Residential (R-40) to General Business (B). The subject property is situated on the southwest corner of New York State Route 25 (Rt. 25)and Locust Avenue, hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, New York (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The application.for a change of zone has been filed by Richard F. Mullen III and William Mullen who are contract vendees of the subject property which.abuts the existing Mullen Motors car dealership. The northern portion of the subject property,zoned HB,is developed with five buildings comprising Colonial Comers (see Site Plan in Appendix A). Although the proposed action will change the zoning on this parcel from HB to B,no changes to Colonial Comers,are proposed. In fact,the only physical changes proposed to the subject property consist of the development of a paved and landscaped parking area on the vacant southern portion of the property(zoned R-40)to address the parking needs of Mullen Motors. Thus,this Part III-EAF will address the proposed change of zone and development of a paved and landscaped parking area at the southern segment of the subject property. As no changes to the northern segment of the property housing the Colonial Comers development are proposed,no further discussion of this section of the property will be provided in this Part III-EAF. 1 The applicant acknowledges that there has been speculation that Mullen Motors' intention is to expand onto the Colonial Corners property. However, Mullen Motors has no current plans for expansion. If, at sometime in the future, business demands were such that an expansion was contemplated, the applicant would be required to file the appropriate applications with the Town of Southold and would be subject to environmental review pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617. As indicated in The SEQR Handbook(NYSDEC 1992,page 22),review of the impacts of future actions are not required if such actions are speculative, may not occur and are functionally independent of each other (p. 22). Consideration of the impacts of changes to Colonial Corners or expansion to Mullen Motors is not appropriate at this time as: • There is no proposed plan for changes to the Colonial Corners development nor is an expansion of Mullen Motors to the Colonial Corners property proposed. Thus, such actions are, at best, speculative; • Changes to Colonial Corners and/or the expansion of Mullen Motors may never occur; and • Any changes that may be proposed to Colonial Corners or Mullen Motors in the future are functionally independent of the proposed action. Furthermore, any future actions that may be proposed would require environmental review pursuant,to 6 NYCRR Part 617. 2 4 With the above understanding, this Part III - EAF will specifically address those environmental issues raised by the Town of Southold, via correspondence from its consultant, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NPV) dated September 10, 1997 (see Appendix B). These issues are as follows: • Project Description; • Land Use Conflicts and Growth Inducing Impacts within the Area; • Visual Impacts; • Cutting of Trees; • Traffic Impacts; and • Aesthetic Impacts including Noise. 3 , \(/ 25 A T! rBeIxedon ES� 25 s bct S O�outhold / A/ ✓ 25 i rower founders Landing Park X� y. oHarpers Point ;may 25 Southold Bay d 25 Mag 15.00 Tue Apr 06 15:02 1999 Local Road Population Center Scale 1:15,625(at center) I Primary State Route Lake 1000 Feet ---- Railroad Land 500 Meters ® Geographic Feature Water Park/Reservation Woodland Figure 1 Site Location . PROJECT DESCRIPTION As described in the Introduction of this Part III-EAF, the project sponsor is proposing a change of zone of a 1.2484 acre parcel from Hamlet Business(HB)and Low Density Residential (R-40)to General Business(B). The northern segment of the subject property will remain as it currently exists (i.e.,with the Colonial Corners office/retail development in tact). Thus,the only physical alterations planned are to the southern portion of the property where the applicant is proposing to construct a paved and landscaped parking area. As previously described,the subject change of zone application,has been made by Messrs. Richard and William Mullen,operators of Mullen Motors,which is situated:immediately to the west of the subject property. Messrs.Mullen are proposing this action as Mullen Motors has been experiencing parking problems at its dealership which has caused patrons and others to park their cars on the street,particularly on Cottage Place. To address the existing parking demands,Messrs.Mullen have entered into a contract to purchase the adjoining property to the east so that the vacant southern portion can be improved as a parking lot which will adjoin its existing parking lot. As indicated on the site plan included in Appendix A, the new parking area will provide 36 parking spaces for Mullen Motors. In addition to developing an additional parking area to address the needs of Mullen Motors,the.applicants.are also proposing to enhance aesthetic conditions through the installation of landscaping at both the new and the existing parking areas. It is important to note that no expansion of the actual Mullen Motors buildings or operations associated therewith are proposed. The new parking area is being planned solely to address an existing parking problem and to ensure that adequate employee,patron and automotive inventory parking is provided such that those destined to Mullen Motors will not be forced to park on the street. Currently,Mullen Motors has a 41 space parking lot to the south of its buildings which is not sufficient to meet existing parking demands. 5 Approximately 0.87 acres of the subject site are developed with approximately 0.6 acres consisting of roads and buildings and approximately 0.27 acres comprised of landscape vegetation. The remaining approximately 0.38 acres are vegetated with trees(some of the mature trees have been cut, which will be discussed later in this Part III-EAF), grasses and weedy species. Construction of the proposed parking lot will result in a modification of approximately 0.31 acres of vegetated area to paved parking area. Leaching pools will be installed in the new parking lot to handle runoff from the paved area. Lighting will be installed for security purposes,however,the,fixtures will have-sharp cut-off angles to prevent intrusion into the residential areas. As part of the parking lot development, significant landscaping.is proposed, especially on the southern segment where the parking area will adjoin residential dwellings. As indicated on the plan included in Appendix A, a 25 foot buffer is proposed along the south side of the parking area. A berm of approximately three feet in height will be constructed within this buffer, and the area will be planted with evergreens ranging from approximately 7 to 8 feet in height. Shrubs will also be planted. This landscaped buffer and berm will continue along the east side of the proposed parking area and will be planted with trees and shrubs. The buffer and berm will also continue along the southwestern property line; and landscaped islands will be installed at the interior of the proposed parking lot. As the proposed parking lot will have access to the existing parking area to the south of the Mullen Motors facility (i.e., Suffolk County Tax Map No.- 1000-62-03-19 .containing 41 spaces), landscaping.is also proposed along the southern.property.line of the existing.parking area. Specifically, a row of evergreen trees ranging from 7 to 8 feet in height will be installed, and evergreen groundcover will be planted at the southwest corner of this parking lot. A landscaped island(evergreen groundcover)will also be installed at the west side of the existing parking lot along Cottage Place. Thus,the proposed action will not only include landscaping for the parking area to be constructed but planting will also be installed in the existing parking area. 6 The only access to the new parking lot will be from the existing parking area to the south of Mullen Motors. No ingress or egress will be permitted to or from Locust Avenue. Furthermore, a six foot stockade fence will be maintained between Colonial Corners and the proposed parking area. Thus,implementation of the proposed action will increase the amount of off-street parking available to Mullen Motors and its patrons from 41 spaces to 75 spaces thereby addressing the shortage of parking. In addition,to maintain and improve aesthetic quality, substantial buffer landscaping and landscaped islands will be installed. The buffer landscaping will screen the view of the parking area from proximate residential dwellings. 7 LAND USE CONFLICTS AND GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS WITHIN THE AREA In its September 10, 1997 correspondence,NPV indicated that,"the primary concern associated with the proposed project is the potential for land use conflicts between the proposed project and adjacent residential uses." However,NPV's letter goes on to state that"the potential conflicts of the proposed project can be minimized through limitations on signage and lighting, appropriate setbacks,buffers and landscaping, and use of traditional building design for any new structures." The subject property is situated within two zoning districts: .the-northern segment is zoned HB, and the southern.segment is zoned R-40. The northern portion of the property is developed with five retail/office buildings comprising Colonial Corners, and the southern portion is undeveloped. Immediately adjoining the subject property to the west are Mullen Motors and it associated parking. The property on which the Mullen Motors buildings are situated is zoned B, and the parking lot to the south is zoned R-40. Further to the west along Main Road(across Cottage Place) is a parking lot utilized by Mullen Motors that is zoned B followed by a property zoned HB. To the east of the Colonial Corners property across Locust Avenue is a.parcel housing a 7-Eleven which is zoned B followed by a parcel with HB zoning. On the north side of Main Road across from Mullen Motors and Colonial Corners are various properties zoned HB. Thus, zoning along Main Road in the vicinity of Mullen Motors-is a mix of B and HB with property to the south thereof zoned R40. The utilization of R-40 zoned property as a parking-area for Mullen Motors has previously been considered and approved by the Town of Southold. Specifically, on April 2, 1997, the Town of Southold Board of Appeals granted a variance to-permit-the area-immediately to the south of the Mullen Motors buildings(i.e., Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-62-03-19)be used as a parking lot for Mullen Motors and determined that: (a) the use proposed[i.e.,parking in an R-40 zone to.serve the Mullen Motors facility] is not inconsistent with the general purposes of the intent of zoning; 8 (b) the circumstances are unique; (c) the accessory use applied for will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (d) the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of this district or adjacent use districts; (e) the safety, health, welfare,.comfort, convenience and.order of the town will not be adversely affected by this use; 69 the interests of justice will be served by allowing the variance, as conditionally noted below. The conditions set forth in the variance approval include: 1. Fence must meet current code restrictions for a maximum height of four feet along the front yard property lines, unless application is made separately for additional relief. 2. The approved parking area is restricted only to the residentially zoned portion. 3. Planning Board site plan approval. . . Thus, the Town of Southold, through its Board of Appeals,previously determined that the use of R-40 zoned property, adjoining residentially-developed R-40 zoned property, would not result in significant adverse impacts. 9 Regarding the current application, NPV indicated that because the subject property borders residential properties and there are several narrow side streets in the immediate area, potential land use conflicts between residential and commercial uses exist. There are several factors inherent to this application that address these concerns and mitigate the potential for such conflicts. Although the application consists of a change of zone for the Colonial Corners property, the only physical modification associated with this application is the development of a parking area to the south of Colonial Corners. No building demolition or alteration is proposed to the structures comprising Colonial Comers: Second, the proposed action is not an expansion of the Mullen Motors car dealership, and no new structures are proposed. The main purpose of this action is to create an additional off-street parking area to address.the existing parking needs of the dealership so that patrons will not be forced to park on the street. Additionally,as discussed in the Project Description section of this Part III-EAF,berming and substantial landscaping are proposed to screen the view of the parking area from proximate residential uses. Landscaping is also proposed along the southern border of the existing parking lot to enhance aesthetic quality. Lighting to be installed will have sharp cut-off angles to prevent intrusion onto adjoining residential properties. Furthermore, no additional access to area roadways are proposed. The only access from the new parking area will be from the existing parking area to the south of the Mullen Motors dealership. 10 With regard to growth inducement(i.e.,the potential for granting of the change of zone to encourage additional requests for B zoning), the.granting of.this action would not be precedent setting nor is it likely to encourage requests for additional zone changes from HB and/or R-40 to B. The primary reason for this change of zone request is to allow for additional parking for an existing car dealership that has been in this area of the Town of Southold for over 70 years. With regard to the HB parcel on which Colonial Corners is situated;the change of zone to B would conform with the existing developed parcels to the east and west which are already zoned B. Furthermore, the existing use of the Colonial Corners site is permitted in the B zone, thus, the proposed action would not result in the creation of non-conforming uses. With regard to the southern segment of the-property,which is zoned R-40,while the property to the west is also zoned R-40, a variance was previously granted that allows the parcel to be used for parking for Mullen Motors. Review of the zoning map and inspections.of properties along Main Road do not indicate that there are sites/uses with analogous circumstances(i.e.,a change zone on a property along Main Road that is zoned HB and is situated between two properties zoned B; a change of zone on a property zoned R-40 for use as parking for an established commercial use with a shortage of parking which adjoins a parcel zoned R-40 approved and used for parking for the established commercial use). Thus, the proposed.action conforms with the established character of the immediate area. . Furthermore,the project has been designed to minimize the potential for land use conflicts through the implementation of mitigation measures including, but not limited to,berming and substantial landscaping;limited access; and sharp cut-off angles on light fixtures. In addition, the granting of the requested change of zone and development of a parking area will not be growth inducing or precedent setting as it does not appear that there are other properties along Main Road in Southold with the same circumstances. 11 VISUAL. IMPACTS NPV's September 10, 1997 correspondence raises the potential for adverse visual impacts ". . .particularly if the property is used for the expansion of Mullen Motors as proposed." First, the proposed action does not include the expansion of the Mullen Motors dealership. The only physical alteration associated with the proposed action is the construction of a parking area to address current parking needs. No structures are proposed, and no bright lights, banners, pennants or additional signs are contemplated as part of this action. To assess visual impacts associated with the development of the new parking lot, it is important to review the existing visual condition. (As no changes are proposed to Colonial Corners, no assessment of the visual character of this segment of the parcel is conducted). The area to be physically modified is characterized by trees, cut trees and grassy/weedy species. The view of the site from Cottage Place is from across the existing Mullen Motors parking lot. Only glimpses of the area to be modified can be seen(see Photograph No. 1 in Appendix Q. The view from Locust. Avenue is of a vacant lot where. many mature trees have been'cut; this area is not pristine and exhibits signs of disturbance (see Photograph Nos. 2 and 3 in Appendix Q. The view from the residences to the south is-also of a vegetated lot that is not pristine. 12 To minimize potential adverse visual impacts associated with the activities proposed,berming and landscaping will be installed (see site plan in Appendix A). Specifically,'a 25 foot buffer is proposed along the south side of the parking area. A berm of approximately three feet in height will be constructed within this buffer, and the area will be planted with evergreens ranging from approximately 7 to 8 feet in height. Shrubs will also be planted. This landscaped buffer and berm will continue along the east side of the proposed parking area and will be planted with trees and shrubs. The buffer and berm will also continue along the southwestern property line,and landscaped islands will be installed at the interior of the proposed parking lot. Landscaping is also proposed along the southern property line of the existing parking area. Specifically, a row of evergreen trees ranging from 7 to 8 feet in height will be installed, and evergreen groundcover will be planted at the southwest corner of this parking lot. A landscaped island(evergreen groundcover) will also be installed at the west side of the existing parking lot along Cottage Place. To detemune the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation upon project implementation, renderings have been prepared by ARAIYS Design, L.A., P.C. (see Appendix D). As indicated on these renderings,the view from Cottage Place will be similar to the existing view except that landscaping will be enhanced on the south and west sides of the existing Mullen Motors parking lot. The view, from Locust Avenue is expected to improve as a vegetated berm will be constructed to help screen the proposed lot. As shown in the renderings in Appendix D, the view from the south is also expected to improve as a result of the proposed berming and landscaping. Thus, the proposed action incorporates measures to.preserve and enhance the visual quality in the area. As such,the proposed action is not expected to result in significant.adverse visual impacts. 13 CUTTING OFTREES As indicated in the Photographs in Appendix C, several large trees on the site have been cut. The applicant did not cut these trees or engage any other party to cut the trees. As previously discussed and indicated in Appendix A, substantial landscaping will be planted as part of the proposed action. The evergreens to be installed will not be seedlings; they will be 7 to 8 feet in height. Street trees will also be planted. Thus, while the project sponsor did not cut or remove trees, the landscaping proposed as part of this action will help to mitigate visual impacts caused by the cutting of trees. 1 14 TRAFFIC IMPACTS As the proposed action does not include an expansion of the Mullen Motors dealership,no additional traffic will be generated. Mullen Motors has indicated that test driving is done on Main Road and patrons are advised not to test drive in the residential neighborhood. As the proposed action includes the development of a parking lot that will help address the shortage of parking which results in parking along Cottage Place, impacts are expected to be positive. To evaluate the traffic issue,a traffic and parking study was conducted by Dunn Engineering Associates which is included in Appendix E. This study concluded, in pertinent-part: Based on the analysis and observations of the existing traffic and parking conditions at the proposed site it is expected that the construction of the new parking field to the southeast of the Mullen Motors property will not cause any adverse traffic impacts. From a traffic engineering standpoint, the parking area will provide for optimum safety of vehicles entering and exiting the new parking lot. After the new parking lot is completed, the vehicles parked on Cottage Place, as well as several of the vehicles parked between the existing Mullen Motors building and Cottage Place will be moved to the newly constructed parking area. This will help to increase safety and roadway eff ciency in the area since less vehicles will be parked on Cottage Place after the construction of the parking lot. In addition, the vehicles between the existing Mullen Motors building and Cottage.Place will no longer be forced to back out onto Cottage Place which possibly could cause an accident hazard. Based on our findings, it is concluded that, the proposed construction of the 36 car parking area will have no traffic impact on the roadway network and therefore should be approved. 15 AESTHETIC AND NOISE IMPACTS As explained throughout this Part III-EAF,the only physical changes proposed are associated with the construction of a new parking area to the south of Colonial.Corners. Such action will bring vehicles closer to some residences on Locust Avenue and on the north side of Korn Road(i.e.,those living closer to Locust Avenue). However, this area will be used for parking only-no service will be performed in this lot. As previously,described, to minimize potential adverse aesthetic and noise impacts, berming and landscaping are proposed and lights to be installed will have sharp cut-off angles (see site plan in Appendix A). Furthermore, as the proposed action,-if granted,will change the zoning of the parcel to B,the vegetated buffer,will be 25 feet which is 10 feet greater than the buffer required for the HB district. As the Colonial "Corners property is not proposed to be changed, no adverse aesthetic or noise impacts will be associated with this area. Also, as the Mullen Motors dealership is not proposed to be expanded,no aesthetic or noise impact will result. 16 BIBLIOGRAPHY Nelson, Pope&Voorhis, LLC, Correspondence of September 10, 1997. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, The SEAR Handbook. 1992. Town of Southold Zoning Code and Map. 17 I APPENDIX A FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. PLAN �RoraS:D"M SCALE 1"=20' �'4veRCRaN rRccscr-e� c 1 • . .i - —-CVCRGRCCN GRIXJNODOVCR 1 11t� • �k �. ac.Tx. t000-c:ba-� i 1 .A',P. C`LA. '`; t• , CORRUGATED ccr.. METAL CLDNG. w MASONRY ` J A r O v MASONRY 6LONG. 1 1 < 6 mcG .O KADC.fCNGC 1 • •.t1NDCN CM NLIfCT.f t ocm :4'MG t— rID!(CT fCNDC MULLEN SITE PLAN Darebp.r t Strstay.t. ®� SMSp.rt Stem M.—.t MOTORS FOP Ppopoc.Fn PAPKINr,, APF • APPENDIX B FREUDENI THAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. NELSON, POPE & VOOMHIS , LLC 1 e N V 1 A O N M E N T A L • P 1. A N N I N G C O N S U L T I N G Pail CHARLES J.VOORHIS.CEP.AICP•ARTHUR 4KOERSEA.P.E.-VINCENrG.DONNELLY.P.E. •VICTOR BEAT.P.S.•JOSEPH R.EPIFANIA.P.E.•R013ERT G.NELSON.JR.P.E. •CHRISTOPHER'Al.ROBINSON.RE. September 10,. 1997 RECEIVED Ms. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Town Board SEP 1 6 1997 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold Town Clerk PO Box 1179 Southold, NZ Y 11971 Re: Supplemental Review of EAF Richard F. Mullen III and William Mullen Zone Change Application SCTM No. 1000-62-03-22.1 & 24.1 N&P Job No. 97208 Dear Ms. Terry: As per the request of the Southold Town Board, we have completed a supplementary review of the above referenced zone change. This review is intended to examine current site conditions as a result of tree clearing activity, and the review and analyze these conditions, community concerns, and potential impacts in the context of the proposed zone change and subsequent use of the subject site as an expansion of Mullen Motors. We have completed a second field inspection, with particular emphasis on assessing the impact of the recent cutting of trees along Locust Avenue. In addition, we have reviewed available material concerning community concerns. The primary issues raised by local residents are: 1) visual -impacts; 2)-cutting of trees on the property; 3) land use,conflicts-and growth inducing impacts within the area; 4)traffic impacts; and;.aesthetic impacts including noise. This letter will provide a brief discussion of each of these impacts; however, we believe that the burden should be placed on the applicant to address in detail issues concerning the proposed use of the intended zone change parcel. In addition, local residents have stated that conditions at the .existing Mullen Motors to the west...violate.past site plan approval for buffering and use of the -employee parking areas. -These issues are separate from the current application, but the Town may wish to address these issues in the context or the requested expansion of Mullen Motors to the subject parcel. The Board may also wish to have the appropriate branch of Town government further investigate these claims as a separate action. One difficulty in reviewing the action is the lack of specificity with regard to future use of the site. While we understand that the project is for a change of zoning to General Business (B), the Mullen Change of Zone EAF Review proximity of the site to the residential neighborhood is such that many uses allowed in General ible with the neighboring community. In. addition, the specific aspects Business may be incompat of site design including design and layout, setbacks, buffering and landscaping, play a major role in impacts and mitigation. Many Long Island Towns require conceptual site plans and often get into the level of detail more appropriate for a site plan review, at the time of a change of zone application.. While exact use and design may not be binding at the time of the.zone change, detailed review generally results in conditions, or covenants and restrictions regarding use, setbacks, design and .buffering that help to minimize impacts. This approach seems appropriate for this project in order to fully understand the potential impacts and mitigation available, particularly in view of the potential land use conflicts. accordingly, it is suggested that a concept plan be submitted with supplemental information outlined in this review The following.project summary and summary.of issues is provided: Project Summary The project site is 'a 1.2484 acre parcel in the hamlet of Southold, and is located at the southwest corner of NYS Route 25 and Locust avenue. The northern portion of the site fronting on NYS Route 25 is zoned Hamlet Business (HB), and the southern portion of the site zoned is Low Density Residential (R-40). The current application is for a change of zoning designation on these two lots to General Business (B). The existing site conditions and zoning are discussed in greater detail in the I P&V review dated July 8, 1997. Mullen Motors, the project sponsor, operates an existing car dealership on the two parcels to the west of the site. The southern R-40 portion of the site is currently vacant, although the vegetation is partially cleared. The sponsor intends to expand the parking facilities for the existing business onto the southern parcel, as the current parking is inadequate. auto sales are not permitted within Hamlet Business or Residential zoning . districts, and thus rezoning to a General Business designation would be necessary for the proposed use. There are five existing retail structures on the northern HB portion of the site which are- collectively known as "Colonial Corners". It is believed that these structures would remain under the current proposal, although the change of zone could permit future removal of the retail buildings and further expansion of the dealership. Land Use Issues As was stated in the preliminary review of the EAF Part I, the primary concern associated with the proposed project is the potential for land use conflicts between the proposed project and adjacent residential uses. The project site has frontage on NZ YS Route 25, a primary route through the Town of Southold. Commercial development has occurred within individual hamlets along the VYS 25 corridor, and the subject property is located on the eastern border of the hamlet of Southold. The predominant commercial zoning- category within the area is Hamlet Business, and the existing Mullen Motors parcels are the only properties in the area which are zoned for General Business. The Hamlet Business zoning on the north side ofNYS 25 is fairly deeo, without side streets, and thus the residential lands further to the north are well buffered. The residential lands to the ,4p.4-CN. pCF-5 S. :c` �z.r�e Page rivWPCNMSNTAL �•J�uNG Mullen Change of Zone EAF Review south of NYS Route 25 are not as well buf dr'6d from the commercial uses. The commercially zoned properties along the south side of the road are only 100 to 300 feet in depth, with residential development abutting immediately to the south. In addition, there are several narrow side streets in this area, which help create the potential for land use conflicts between the residential and commercial uses. Local-residents have expressed concern that the. change of zone will "compromise the rural character of the area", and might result in subsequent requests for zoning changes on surrounding properties. Limited land use conflicts might be expected to occur with any commercial use, even under the existing Hamlet Business. zoning. The proposed expansion of the car dealership will present a conflict, particularly if the existing Colonial Corners Center were to be.removed in the future. The center is traditional-in design and is occupied by several small businesses, and would offer a visual buffer as long as it remains. There are relatively few properties within the Town with a General Business zoning designation. If additional areas for General Business development are needed within the Town, it is preferable to locate them adjacent to existing General Business parcels as proposed. However, due to the depth of the change of zone parcel which encompasses the R-40 parcel south of the FIB frontage, the encroachment of this zoning into residential use areas indicates that the proposed change of zone is generally not consistent with the surrounding zoning (with the exception of the existing General Business zoned Mullen Motors property to the west). The potential conflicts of the proposed project can be minimized through limitations on signage and lighting, appropriate setbacks, buffers and landscaping, and use of traditional building design for any new structures. Mitigation as well as alternatives,should be explored in order to ensure than land use incompatibility is minimized. Visual Impacts The preliminary review also discussed the visual :impacts of the proposed rezoning as potentially:significant,._particularly if the:property is used .for. the:expansion of Mullen Motors as proposed. Car dealerships are.typically.characterized,by.bright lights, banners, pennants and other advertising methods, as high visibility is preferred. The expanse of pavement which is generally necessary for a car lot may also detract from the visual quality of an area.. These impacts can be partially mitigated through the use of landscape islands, retention of vegetated buffers and lighting restrictions, as suggested in the initial NP&V review. Town code already prohibits the use.of pennants, canvas banners and most temporary signs, and fighting within the General Business district is restricted to the front third of a lot with poles of no more than 14 feet. The required vegetative buffer within the General Business zoning category is 25 feet, which is greater than the 15 foot buffer required within the Hamlet Business district. Covenants could also be placed on the number of cars which could be stored on the site and 'building design for any new structures. These measures should minimize the visual impact of the proposed project. NELSCK PCPS.4m %/CCFF;IS. LLC �:a_ _P"9Ne . =NSULrn:e Pave 3 Mullen Change of Zane EA.F Review Traffic Issues Several traffic issues have been raised by local residents in response to the proposed change of zone, although these issues are largely the result of existing land uses in the area and are only indirectly related to the current proposal. Some of the problems identified include test driving by Mullen's Motors customers within adjacent neighborhoods and the .partial obstruction of Cottage Place by cars awaiting service at Mullen Motors. Use of local roadways.by large trucks has also been cited as.a problem, although the.majority of trucks probably originate from the existing Hamlet Business uses, particularly the adjacent 7-11 store. .Mitigation of existing traffic problems on.the Mullen Motors property pan.be explored by the Town in conjunction with the applicant;. however, the focus of impact analysis should be on any additional traffic impacts which result from-the change of zone. In fact,'it is likely that the proposed expansiony-would improve conditions along Cottage .Place by providing additional parking .areas on the. property. A traffic/parking study would be useful in conjunction with the current application-,.to address these issues. Cuttina of Trees The preliminary review prepared by LNP&V recommended that the existing street trees be retained in the southwestern portion- of the site. Some of these trees, including large Norway spruce trees, were cut without authorization in July 1997. Although these trees were not 300 years old as stated by some local residents, they did provide an important visual buffer between the residential area to the south and the commercial strip along NZ YS Route 25. A subsequent site visit by NP&V staff showed that the large spruce were approximately..60 to.80 years in-age, based on the number of growth rings,present, with a -maximum diameter of 32 inches at breast height. It is unclear whether the project sponsor is culpable, but the Town may wish to take action in response to the removal of the trees. Such an action would be separate from the SEQRA process; however, replanting of a vegetated buffer in-this area should be made a condition of any site plan approval for a new commercial use. Use of transplanted older trees, rather than seedlings, would be preferable in order to provide immediate screening. Aesthetics and Noise The increase in intensity of use of the subject parcel would be expected to result in certain cultural impacts including aesthetics issues, light and noise. It is noted however, that many of these impacts are already present or cound be altered through commercial use of the HB zoned portion of the site. The operation of the facility will determine the level of impact, and the-ability-to control or limit such impacts. Barriers are effective in reducing off site transmission of noise, and site plan and zoning controls would be expected to limit impacts due to lighting. The general increase in activity may compromise aesthetic qualities of the nearby residential areas, if site use is not properly designed and controlled. :accordingly, operational as well as design issues are important considerations at this stage of review. V SCN. PCi�E Z VCCr_H18. LL:_ tv�i'C`�v.E� sL ate-:wWG P�R.L��G Page 4 Mullen Change of Zone EAF Review Other issues raised by local residents include noise from car alarms and from the service area, and the possibility of toxic smells from the proposed project. These concerns relate to the proper management of the existing dealership, and would exist regardless of the intended use of the subject property. The change of zone review should address the potential for these impacts to increase or decrease with the expansion of the facility. The Town consideration of the pending zone change and the desire of the applicant to expand the subject facility to the adjacent site provides an opportunity to review the overall -operations.. Both Mullen-Motors-and the Town may be able to use this as an opportunity to improve compatibility with the existing operation, in an effort to have Mullen Motors "be a good neighbor". Based on this review it is clear that the issues involving the pending zone change'are complex and should be carefully considered by the Town Board. As a result, additional environmental documentation is appropriate to explore these issues and provide a basis for a Determination of Significance under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) as well as to assist in reaching an informed decision on the zone change. This should be in the form of a detailed Full Environmental.Assessment Form (EAF) Part III Narrative to analyze key issues_of the project. The Full EAF Part III (if required) should provide a detailed project description including project construction and operation. .The Part III.should be accompanied by a conceptual site plan that would depict the intended use of the change of zone parcel. The topics outlined in this correspondence should be used as a basis for further analysis in the Part III Narrative. The document can also serve as a means to seek input from groups or individuals as provided for under SEQRA Part 617.14(c) prior to issuance of a Determination. If Mullen Motors intends to expand the existing building or to_demolish the existing center as well as add additional parking, these actions should be considered as part of the current application 'rather than under a separate SEQRA review. The EAF would then provide a basis for either a Negative Declaration if potential impacts are either not significant or are mitigated, or a Positive Declaration to require an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) if there are outstanding impacts that can not be mitigated. As an alternative, the Board could consider requiring an EIS at this time. Such a document could be scoped to include only those key impacts.of the project, and would include discussion of mitigation and alternatives. In conclusion, the Town Board has three options for action on the proposed project. The Board could deny the project based on currently available information. The decision to deny the zone change should be subject to a Negative Declaration, allowing the Board to fulfill their legislative decision on the zone change. The Board could choose to issue a positive declaration and require additional environmental documentation through a Draft EIS with a limited scope addressing the potential traffic, visual, cultural and noise, and land use impacts of the proposed change of zone and expansion of Mullen Motors. Mitigation of these potential impacts should be discussed in detail, and alternative sites explored. Finally, the Board could require a Full EAF Part III Narrative to analyze key issues, and then utilize this as a basis for a Determination of Significance and/or decision on the zone change. The use of Part III EAF is our favored option, as this RPM VESCN. F=CPE 6 VCCF.HIS. LLC �+vineruvi�r.r arrr,u,G fs�-�L-vc Psge Mullen Change of Zone EAF Review provides the applicant with the opportunity to address key issues and impacts. The document can be used to solicit public input, and will provide a sound basis for the determination of significance. If there are one or more key impacts that are not mitigated, the Board would retain the option to seek a complete Draft EIS. If you have any questions or wish. any further input with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to call. .Very truly yours, NELSON .POPE_&VOORHIS, LLC Charles JNoorhis, CEP, AICP VEL�ON. ?CPS 6 b'CCFHIS. L: Page 6 APPENDIX C FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. + l I \ 14 Ulm 1 ' r P �•_ A l W h r S�+aiY`i �M�[4r,.rrdiis'P,ttCT �! +I!)/ a�l+ • s �rvaro r wa". fi.,4t, Pi'St40, $�mFs�' x "t¢ .e 1 ° sr aL�tt;er>ir:� � e Fsc v.* � �.��y'a"i`x`�"+i}�c t;,.`� �•Te�y y�41f�+11 'f:� �r+, ���1��� Y�.�'1 � y/!, ., 4 J,e„ h y �rl'�Li�,y.lF4Hr1l� ` �.►`'� ��.S '••�:.k l�.1� r F k � 1yy 1 >i� � 5 1 f rl•\J i • _ r {- ss� "'.FIR t`t�� �1 \ta r � �)/ 1 �1� � ! r �• - n �.L u'• f,�ryt 1!{y{•�1 II 5:.11\ �11�'-.11 �Ilr it .. REF•;•. - '". ����f ''�t'�....a.-�-T cam.- � -+.r,r �"� ', .. 1 1 1 MIN �r '�:q �' r F'`i `'Yk+i of rl ,�,'�t , 2't� ,. �.�•�U� '•�''a�i'•.' L,lj� \ •, t u p 4 c.. c\� �h •:�� '� � �1. v'r r.i'!�i Z `�`a ��r.�� ►T��lir '.n�l��.��\ s•�p:,,i t" � r ,,,J a l r � } r /� t:.�•r•�.\ �'�v,r�,,►t . F.y,� r �.Eai -' ;f• e�� .r £ yt`. r. 1\ s� S.�',1' ,�r 1 <-r �,'�•�' • APPENDIX D FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. r t•�.j�� ',y'4 may`'•ply"i'�:'',4•\''�;}r>a.\�_.•r 1 �.. �1•,-f� r t! a •-\�7 �`'C,S�� ,�r �r,/'� T:y('�3:�1`�'�Yr'�zCi"��i1k�1"';•�••r .Y � r/� ``'�'4� � �' ©.-� .t Y�iti f g•+.tY ^ ;r=��`�i l/�fyi"y'V►-'i.f:•r�`�x,!�`yy14!��;�j� w�' f_'ir'". Ll! „ ��� a�i•t'',-��, ''•+tom s„ls --1 _ . u� _ �`r � p 4.u.� � •�•+•t*�;w`18Y JI►_��/�:' � ••� Ik'F-��•'�,sr..�/� t,a eel, �d� wo-•++ ^�, . 't•\.1,s r. .� :i .GEC tiA.y� ., .r'kt�raay:,. ,� �,t.r' / .(^�. T. C ..Q ,�' _Rt- /'RZ t,, S ➢ •3 •�'1°I`���'n r•;`•'� i+i•�:.�y, ��'- �w' =gyp y '� �1 MM•C#?r. �'T•"-'^I .,Jvp'� �` _�,; a 4;'C'��a���r•`•'!���'�(C',i•�.�',•'���r�.� /-?•�'`;~��: w r <•/' ��Yi 1�'.-'hhl•�,>(� C.• '�: .t l:•�i• �..,1�' , \'- ' / _ t�S�:'-ai $ �'`15;'� 1,\�l•rn s �: `:' �p - "1 , .1 f, � ••r.',-° vc. 'd, '��n•-�T'"P` S, ���� 7 - S i��.5�,5rr♦d! y�.>•,:✓ �. �"•�.:, !�j. • �/Yt/' `( i ;':�.�•- i.�•'47µ a�.. y r �s�„�yy +�c� •.;-,'`:,kAa ,.,Y�� ,�7�' �i r.:{es•:''�_='"�<?1 r '�?t"cl'' .�, i . •-n",.:i, xx;y;:,- �-i:�1i•: �•. �...�<. r.y.�-. ,� j _ +�ra�.•� y •- f rr'1'Y � '�7' �'rJ'" ,ti1;�, - � 4-` '� .;�� v�•rY .l � ♦Q,� -^C. '. ) � -q.� �l•M,�^+-,. .y�'�S:��r '.•�.. ,l: � �;, � •�a��"���'r..' v-a''"!�,-J•"'"~�i+. � `.��,. �C3 f'-' ': r Y':�e� O! :t.. ik' Y� -0F �= G'�. � a � tr•,1i'{_Tu �F•,:. '{:7,� 4ir w: _ ^Y _-�7::^-.. . lI,^. �; 5•,.,!:�>. t`.. ,},fir. y� � .�.m`l :j:^• :y.v. ��n:T.'E: �'J, •�19.d' a..x�•.�,i".M •;v _ art"• .�►�. .\ �,L `�{'1�- .i�rr J' ,:f��' -F.S rj/' iT •. -�r• - ':A,w. l,t-•Y:- _'N.'.♦ !�'�a i.,/ 1yr ♦. ..�,yf'' -� r ,`.-! •� _ _ _�. �;.�<r �3.y��`�.-- �!�C `� �.. '_•�x,.r..�y�� C' - E a�7�+7 ! � '�•: t� ���j�•��,+ ,V".!-,'".�:�pl � ��� T +�ly"'�s ; r4t..1 c: :.r uJ`:x- n .�,. ? � �:.'�i�7.o�� �•��, '•Y �E:,'. � -r�,.ta��' r ..t^ }�cr'f•"' pl, :;,•, `�.- .� �'. ,�4 '` ._,.:-yam,+.e�•�n+,:�....�• •:_.�'f'.. Y , ``^...y et.: cc+= >7Ys` � '�'�rw•,:a�' -' "'- 'w;r.. •/ S. c' ,r ., :'•E�'>'d�:o r o�^„a.e• .'+S7ge�.i+ �- t�`" ' � =�Y ..::� � ,( :;h'1^ ✓�- �': .ry w*1. t. ' .S. �•�i o r -�!� -�.1' ^ >`._ .',� :'a1._'"'=3� - �'' ' � ,t',�i.r''�e k.• {' .�+ _ f � :: '-„y.ks�-" �- �g�y�j Omar, �• s"?; t" r .ti%;�,�'�_ ♦ I• �i :•< ,r3a�r�� 1�- ty6V '. � :c=:� % `\`• ,.c. ,.,::•• 'c �. r .V•, .!- t 3••1:• �...,t. ♦' t- .-Y: ,s�� � ���� ��~ E , ��•�� _ .s 4. � :'_r 'is�, a t {`_:'_cl 'Q. taS � � ;Q'�- ,� / y �c` �+x' r'`•'vy�• -O. vc,per ` v' .?,}Y,•_ .� �d'•':; �i =s.?. rtt- f - -ter'-' t yam` <., I:, :d' 7� �'at•,� ^c:' :5::.''1rs'�;+z-.. c•. / :-•�•� yr.�t ;rn - ds / .J'. -?.,'#h .•a.. .f a=.�• � "\� ydr„ .;.�, -,•rtr' .`� `C-d��s.�. �. f. ..a. : ._.a ya a!':.tF<- ,y fl;r• g� _ �,t,,,� + .E.•m' z ..sr.•,- ,' :•1:. .t. �.'� .F•.r:e�:✓"� S:= r;:.ya� ` FrWON- - r_ p ,•c$2 -:: •". . r� •rr- - .ter ..r, JG✓'' ,��C•� .;ri..a.• -!�:. .�' ��•�/ �f.: !• - ���f: ,lj%*;�"' ��.:aK���/' � .TS .'•{•• �'r;�' �i-e7< .per_ �'=i;�. 1 ,r'- `Tz••-;_'t•C. •..sd r.i•.Y_�r,..fJ/',��, �.-L.�s"• aS _. r,� ''•. /-� �s> .�,r'_��'�+. _�,,/ '1�,� u Y -'�, - _y_�'R•� ,����' _�^ �1.. �o;�GvT � ON R'. ?1� ;`� Z tc 'El Y.s' rb 'yAf.f •9 � y % :�i - , OEM �F> •� �Ni.cr �� 3 a r ! 5 � .i ..�.. � : fa I :�'^ .� -;� r"•-^:z"- �?" ,:,,=�,•:_i'`2'` iT�- �+s� - / � �-q+Ly�, r� ®e�l�( ,�,.�,r _ a•. � _ � �.' .,,, ��1 S\ L t>- 3, `Y� ^,' to ,\� T :r S*t�,y. j• �L'.r.r� -\ <$j"I 1��g. ,; J QR�9� 1 .'S ,E. .�. ` fr.C.,� ��_ �`� -' • .Z�'�,� `� :lr� ' rr `�i �• ' I.g s �'\- ,?. 't'_�°A� '�.aY+ �f' _ -..�' _r_.iri�'•'='•�=•s_=,>I,3r -' .�r�.•, �i�=,=�i=x ��'"' E,.t�yl°'�'��'�y�;.rC'„s,'r-�. I :i� 'ON CM '.�.o'' e j _,.: !'•%� r$)�'. '.•'' .E►,:": S _.:-�-`< .: - y. •�r,•r r•,et.r�. +� •7�,i, ,. :y, �^,'� ..ice ,.r s_� :�:.-.1.,,.'i"�• '•a`': 'ei`y ��sY' i'a� ::i �'� /'"��i+.-...,:^.' �'s�-. `75 Via' /� �'S Y+'+ - .,:f. 11'' ✓ :r.�-.� >.�ty, i� _!.�r,!, �'•y. _ a�':--:�:la�'j' �•�}-:< :r.J�� ..._1�•C� �•• � ky, �P,r. -,r_ l..i <(li �.<� - `'S'.J `'1`.,:C' :t•.:.kn,-�.y /ytr„•._ -fi... .f�.,"y, t'-,'•�.4. >.. /� - •:u;: .... .:h. '". �ti... `P'^i; .."r �!'+M•r. e v_,•-'.'-i• '-d'y/..::. e� aMr. k.- t 4 �ii'�= r s. e. � •y. �•\�Fr:" _.:.s. ,"-d'� .r-�.:.t3'� LS'-f.�� � 'L i ��"� '4.d1' '-�R• �� e - � .�a., f.' - -� -":: .X:'aanj ;>u�=`\. -'-.�'� Z.. ��&-; .ter 'M"j _ �:?�.. PJ' ',`i---4•., .r s��:=•`�'6r`.�,.t.pti,`d��.� -� ,�yf.SI 'C�g�'�' '�,t., ,.r. a 1 1•: �l�ji1�., ye q.�`�y '� �'e �-'t���'�:..� �` _ ii _�z,e�'.r .��J� .►., ..� ";.c '-�i j� ,}4� a�g'c!e�w. '3. fi�•..�. rim - '•ttY :�V'i:y_,y �t r� _ C' 1 p� _ _ "r /•9 ��• �'�',S`�. .�• ''.y-r rjF' _ �.�wsa �1y�,,li�-+�.�i'- T y ;•��, X �., :�' C, ✓.�. - "r:•• -.l<.': e"F;v - .Ar ,,a_ ''•9 � '�.ti -df '`Y i .�(, ;1, G?` y(!:• ..••.$'r <r' - �`� r �:,..sr.>'Lhyvs��� ," -.3'aw•ti .7y rf3�... .1:' i �<-:1_. C. •. ,c.�:Fi•'.c- 3 - �.;. -•+t it l - .s r! �:• s .e��•`.... �_�'• _ - ..3,•.-,r.r.• �- - � -'E�::.:. :�;;:-�. f"•.�"a... .5.,'1. <r".-, r• +i•� lYai'^p•�k',�`'j ".e• r �L �.: :r-?i:�: •3v -b"� i+%•'1e �,,�<�- ±c. .t'�a _,..r:i� ':roc, C _:a; �f• ,s. �.,,+�' ` �'t��' r•i,`,'[�,Y �:,•«_ - ::r••y ��., A//�t(1[.. IF: /,'� ir•.Iy �•:-` y�� p 1 - 1' :sr14 YES `''!� '7t- �♦�. r - ,i:.'cT2 ..t..:.�.-'+ �(� .•i-+ �,. �.i�� �.••• .4j, .. rn fj�.Ly' ?�� � j.' - -'F \ � Y+c. ''* >. - .a,':r'1` "'-�' •X:i'--'�'.. 4- -r^:. r.• r�' y -,f t5.-�._ •_�.- .� " �.�r< .1 f+ 1'v LY':1. � : �y� . .•.•f; �� @'Y � .1�'Y{ - •:�.✓9f'"' � r��.. a}_.-Tr 6 '� �i �e{ v'�J "�`: 4 1-:+�.•.1n-,-::., W,- .wT<+T•r. )' Tr.�'' �+ �f�:�Y ��a �:v4 �. --_;��'JC�3R� d�; -!'/ :••d: .; f,� `:'-2` f ��;�...,':.£'' �'>?e�;_:: �e� -�'r L_,J�`•'r •T:?�hyE.:Jp_'a• .?p- ..A<y''l�A �,•3�:.-f, .Sf� .,t�,. .! _"��� e�r � f�^+ .!4�;,. =:�'�s.3��s"~- •�� 'u:a.v'e=>:et.m- . �ra .cr`�•�y� T`<< ./ ;..�_. r _ '�, _ A^, :•i}.{ -'. ✓}r'_.e r. - •.,�,e 1f-e _� '}.�C?7 _ � �;�- �3 '�-J/' .f �..-,,;t..;n� +.s .M� :: c�- 'r: K ♦ s'.r - _ �J - +< - .t.�� � -�. �: v�.q _ ��-t'.t%1� J !'y.•'f,`�-•-'':` �i.�. ~` /'c'�}-. Rom. '' .5�.. r,� E* �' ''•J, �T .fQ-�[!. •� t' 1' d i__- ��•:�� L:.�:11�i'��� .�'. '-- '`•�-' +�•.'•.,.�-' �3`-- � „`-`sif �s.. .�n.4. "'r. -,,- ac: r`.; �:..••¢r•- -.�` <�/ �,- L l.l��.s - ,./`.�_' 'rG:�6�_;�. .�,., r.-•? y moo, . ' d�k �i'.�, •+.:?.� .s'• ''� .:r: -� -�.f.:-.�::��,i.. _ .. `v?:F`- :;�a�;-='7_�71� >•r .•r i.' r "'�•- �9' �:;,Jj >• •s. I j•1?I�.r�A a. ��: .2.. /�j - +••[ r- 'i 1� - :,. ,t'�d,� `r.f-^.�. .�;',"' _.t..: '.t_7 �_ _ .�a•e'r '8 -_..l .-_� }.57. .4r:re^.':..,, '•P �`fj•+ '1.+ x .'?:' {%+� =`'4' -s,`•♦ --.,'�! .. ?i,.:: rr�.:eM' .. _ �'C�n_ _srA. T,� � 1 �,ts* n t+4S= ITa�' �'�.'.�: t'' :`.��:[.. ,} �s^�.;r.if.si�` ••••.� ;`�j' ia";� '_, C.' K..s ;:+ _ - .._,.1" � Fred+ y, .�� -'4i•: � '4 ';.,. '�� ..el 'D � .f cl..T/ � �_�:� r, •�.= 'a`-i•.;.cs _ � c.. �c'� '�az�': °# .0. tt�� � - 1,..:�_� L3`•+-,'Y„•r _ -Is%;..- � �l /f'rr�� `�' E. +_ .�. ••; :.:a y r"3t Y..JJ'+'mod..- •� /• %�+'�� [:. �• _ u-••-• .� ��.!� � d _ �' 4. �.!"v.%�'- •� f � 9a•S, .e 1 �. Y`r :.1,.'." .r•�,f•+.;.. •y'(('� a�"" b�@ ��j. .a. •j - !vY �.: � 1f'� �--- •.' ���.,c_ d ^. r. � � L. 1•i. k ri.' '�,\I '�t�.. - _ �'1• ♦•/ - "a+ :t'43••-r. / i •'i-' �Y •1►'•�w: f\/_.is r .s.. y'j i �P� '+'fey. ♦, i�•;!' i^<i•.'. �"11,?4� i� 9 tY ;• S :@NIA �.. :./. ��5;,4° .pi ` ..�.'y. 9•��j. a r' ,� i• ..J'' - .+�F!•..'!�.. � . �T.r�_b3' r•. -!� i I'. `fir :�•;'='.,•#.: `� �.�41". _ �+f ,5�I ..-''94- !r 3' - "J, ,':-��,G':�/� 's':a7�T�•;F.:ya�;:% C,'iT-�'��,�t'W�L�I � j '`.. •'1�r�_j�-i' 0 1'-� j.d�X'j ,R .���.'Tr> r t-♦,�6 :� �' :1 t �' � •9 i_ la- Yi.�ll� >:�� /� `•`"'� l r � x' •�,e. •i' J','�tzS ="' •( si<= rr� '� n _ r''rya�'1�/� i. ��� '' '�`-1a.; c_ .j �+ !3 :.+Ilj ly j y• O ! ::-5' gr r/.., �r..!:..- "r :% '.I�! -•1 �J' '�w ei':I�.,^ a'I "'��� i 1",T,, ?• q ��z ^1 ) - •1.:-`' ='+ �^� [ r. fir" •:r i. F L !. 1. L _ t1 ;'� j Y. .f,s�url 5 o a: •.i' - 'n. �+!=..: \, �'>iMs�{�y'. �' a - �I'• ,/ „3 t+•`s�.•,e I•,+�J 1z•,. G /E•+i. ..'i -,��'„ w!' ♦ Jy'. q,. .;! <�/i;f '.'`' �• pe �!-• w:; (, *'• � -�:tM sa .f.,.:.. .� !;: ".> s: n :."a "t:f•.♦ .-�,_:. __ F�!•• - a ,� •t�ti� * ,••J• 'ryY7 a{v i?•. r 6< •A. �(I•C - �„•.;:.. a'�, b •)��A ��"• f •�': ..•al' .t,� �v c•,(.s; r'L .. ,��., _ .5 •1 *.l A `F :7 n,t b•:•i ,�'_.•�77 .rt :r: 1 3 F°' 1• / a 1 V � w Fir- _}••:"4:, ....>,_��+ J •� � ./ :•11 f_ .� nt Cam^-, '�f �T"�a� ri Q�' r. �•- R'� r . s- `,._,:,• �r i ,I 't /f /. -r4�+q _ i•L. �i�.:' ,<' >� `� +i; x. r'. .r w� .,r8.-� l• es I zd.: � r a-�: � � a 3 6� � �a R• s4 �'" i r•- y i tt .�/ "'«7.. .% � ..-},l •�� `d =,-t!: `.t•' �°� .�'•,i '1`s. .1 ,(�. �,• l �'.r_ ,�' +•,.✓. �''.S t' /• }� t. .+4 iFrl;',. n- •�' ed '�' - •� y��':•5:i`i t� �S'. f`., - � �f��• .t,� �? - a --i Y: .�•. � ,.a.. •�\S. �(Jjgi�' '� p- - :�•r`t ^}. a 7 - .� ':.$.... .a:>i a �• a .i' +f�,. :•.r. � ./ - �, �.E 1`-.y Y./.�. 1 -r:v �A Jr.d.� ..v! ',id-- - - .<„ •i 1�. -'..t,•. - Y..''_• .#G� 'i<-.v,.ti-. �/, ..'✓ .,�- �' >,' '� 9 r �.r� ..Y L:a.t.�... �r *.crt' J �"^ar� "a - y- �,- �i=.: '�. •..r �r` r.y, ��* `, `�E: / "�`,I i� :r=r ,(j`�� yid � -� :E. ,J.'a[•.c. .�.•q 1•:r_....r' .A Y.�•' >r + :7"� /%y- 1 _ ri►''/ ;sue:.. ij � \ � ti s _ ..#;.a. t't si'+ ,�( -'r-' �� _ :-Y r'_ � 3. 3{'r'.:'•lt.' �`/� .6r� \ t �j �' _�. �X_ - r ���._.Y� _ � /,.. ,I Tra t• �.� /Y- � f ,r/. 3i •�. •+' Itr• "d�`�:''•r4 % ..rh'r t•+i.� • :fin• _ y' •s �'E q 'µ •.��.. .t- .a"+.i ''JJ � .r,+_�/, � �r .� E � 1;o:" e% -•ate a,. � �'ti. r � i� •exa ./�- •'r, Ji +.Y- `.i.. >.F2.. /:1 � 'S' ' �l; it-�.t. � .� rS:Y•a. I �,f_ � ♦.2 i.. �:,..-' s•� p Aa-r �'/ .' ;it. ';� � ..t•`. •'Itl, � � tl ., - i�lj•• 1 1�> �=_ ��.- . .�.).; - -f. J. s j:,.1 .1-'a' d •S•`�';mil!J3) :JAI Y" :Y .�:'-i. .y'O a / \.i.'%'i c:t+ "yr" 0'/ •:� :`�• +j,. :.��; `-. yr. '� T.' R,_a •�""a�et'-�..,';-t... i 5L •il •'•i `�l `� '�1: +� ��•' t.�r �3i'ts+... .,t.1:':S, � I< y+�-� :•.e:•: .�7-.-'1+'' ,♦ '•.r^ � ' ' ' e: ►' ) % c:= s' .iF : o+.�. `r,te!f":' r,....t yF�;. s. r.. _ :+/ •1• f r 5�\ � ; .< e•S' / :�'S. .c, rr'.•:` - �1't• �t� r �• t •♦: r?.. .•'fit-'a.&.t,S:•tc•.J r, r �1. �l;`:� .,,%�.. -1 .D �t�•. ,1� a+ f.?'1 "r 1.''`t�.�: `.r•'•,c..-., �!.ra',-'s•.i �'�.:a"� ',i' � _ `�• f ?�' 7:+ ... �'- \,1 a-+ �� ��:�i, p a: -fir -�`1 � ,�ij ( I,' •+�.•1;':;• .:••+ i �aa,-y'� -:�� �. 1��p •' •� t�' �'�• 'L �� :, `; .y 4;.�?�f• •> �. j y(r�+ � �'/ . r (�R' J •1 'i",`t' ���a i• . .��• '� r 9 )fi '!� \`• ., .O-',-.'-? �+. .•.�,ff ��� j `� I v. j]�r /( •� .�T� •// '1 � ` ,/ r�Af 1tf �ci•�r� •� -� / `• 14 eA V 1 � y a. 3.� � : r a J ♦• 'rC -•+ a },. J -r c r G. y3:r:-n:'i:L, .^ .J �`�aF 4p �`Jg� �' 1' �1 a •'L � I. � V { `r' t`t7 4V ? �t • V-� 6Y �� �i�� �� `�:•rQ<•rL'ro• .. „a-„r'��.,r.� _ �..:__�. _---��'�31 r �4. `!`Palf','��••• ,J �'' r' •.r:j• fF a .,'1 -):a.J� .2�,i� ? . �r ---'\..sir,?: -t_i_'r'�---++;aG^x--t?_ .•w - Jd r••-�q �} '�' :r; J'�_' r-!. i •..;., :?•`''.1, ..�:. i�!".'.`; ,f.R' f. ••_ ---_ �.': ;�� ..—-"'"r :;tom 's"`L'S' :.�+?• ',[ � i 4, �. �\� � Q1a,., s• _ r. •t:r.: � r is�:i- �`5-✓' - `:+ .1.L'yr,�• f t �� .r:-'n �,'f-� - --�-.__ •'�-��'�+--•_._.-.....""� rl -.^ ��.�. e. \ !V�'t, -h_... ,r-; '• \sd a�+�•Z �� .••s`_: .� 1.^`y o ���T--� -tis- .rG4.., ir�F�� �l '♦'. \� \.,+, i ti ti .l. a'• '� '.'c-a..^'rr-•�s�3'='' '•o-!-.raa` `"�.;'�P- .' y�-.�..-._. rb./' xJt: .r� -�,c.. `' _ J } :y i'.`''J'J�- •f ''`�. I-. '•� - __--u.•�_ e-ti-:ra.�.v Si:O�-t+r - �� _r .tir?..• \.t.�\���\".� F +'r: -^_f �''. •t5 :y'- `d•�`•`•.,�• +^'�y 'r s_-..��-�aa;,,;,--..+•n..L^.7.:�r - rF'" e• ;3.. � •`,.. _�.,_r.:�:.�-^�" r.e• •.. -�� ,<r r,,.yc c. -'�. m _ mar. � a - fx' { ; y 4 ( y Zvi'' - ",•, c, k' .:r3 v---�c�" - =- �1a } ]) Lt 1:.:� i�.i_c � ?,lea .lam•-_ ••a'- �rl.v�-?. _ - J �_ ___ `•�'"�•a"sn+... � � R f.}t 'S-.ii5,•� - :-{•-tl�;� c e` :).::..::..�,��: - ;it• �- di•- :v. _ — - 5Fj� !.• IO c `�-- -''F:•+'t' �a-'�}:'' a _ .. ..i. .Y:`vr�':t -•r,:.'"�._L,..,. ��; j-. 1,=•:;e'r..��'1C.3`g /i' .,.a•; --t� .d��--••�.e ?!ate` � I 1 �r�1Ct :���•Se,) _ �• _ _ I'�,�.{�'•i h.+,•e •;� rL kd Ltr �M .p, I�, .L-V f'. .;5 '.L :•7' _ �ti,-'.a��ay .:7•'..� 'V• �- _. +•- ! .1, { _�:;3fi S: vy r.t a � ,Y• 7 1 .3 � 1 f -�r• '� i, __ `t .- -I f.`Fr` Ts '�` t 1 n. 't "�` .•f,;� et{�;"r:il,j,.;Y� �y ^o 'J '� 1 r �• I iI� .aera �.• .q rre�al �ra� +.. � � •� •.\ !.{t \� S_��1- �j-�c :Y,...��:.- ...�-,. -i�•�1'.{ f .�r-rT ��Jy , _ o^i SY.c7;� it I r� -.. - .e" � - ,a -'tea.-`-..Ott .{,r P?ti.J�' _r � ��' '=/�Yr� :'.-..1.. �t ,y" <2•.'�.��.1 • n .+c _ - - =''.._,,..- ,.- _•�-' _.. '"-�r°niSYn.1`iis:�<::Cwr.•.,n_�X:.y-.a� �.._-., .t: -K'_." a}.� r. e:.-a. r _.s���j�. Cf sl f-"'�-ir t... �-ti-c.+.�'F-r• - Wa7s •�. _:r-. � r •S."� .lai. :Y , _...�...3,.,,�;.•„�.. :�''J{ ''i.^= - .sue`. •r._�.-. _._.. _ � •^d7 w •'.iY� ^Ira:� r,1i��,J^ •F`. �.1•' „�'r.; ��4;t. -f''- -�3. .;:rf'`•�''- - r•.• .� -O it R- - ��'.. a R. %.'f• _ -P. _ - r✓-•-Y. l { S`• ._ir,� - �r,r— � ..), - ♦ r5'• .!� 1-'1"•••:1`v'• rr C[ia'^...,..r L=:-y.- i .tr ���L �U 1 - `::: ,r_x• .. � i � '- I--�_ `•- .'S zi•+a'^^•�'!^_.ruu"`"ff••hS�`^'`� _st!- �;,.f' 3 �-� F i �` ,,G. �.i i' •a•��a S i �� -a•r � ...�+-,e :. :i i_�,r•t�'t - � � r �e ♦ a• r � "r r .� ♦ s•_¢..• �✓� -J� s.. li, aL-Dt�.l• r rV� Pj �o'F'rr .rk,' _ _ _ - ^. :• hcT., •Y.�_ D - t �� / a ` ^'f+y j 3 4 ..� �'��r-',- ' -- . '. 3 i esX.jr i - v-i,s�! _'�_ti.< �K•ip7.1 �>- aS.�-y� .y: tf r _ �,... �..t6r�„ _ate-`-av �, -••' � %.- i - e,. r, � �y. ���V,;. s �'4.50 - �'a9•'�`-1�....� � _ t r .. >(!lr�^F'yK.. y .T�S- `+'.e� .� �'°S'f< _. .r . sf•'F i;�>• .� ,a- �'� .• j�r. ....b rC i 1 �f t ! ' ' '� ..!'_ �.-. � y i;�,.. �.-}�� r. rCi� ,�, ♦�it 4ti a� a io;'6'4;.. r -.N �.ii`•;� a e' to _�.l�rr�-;..''sir,�, r� , � / '•.•..!�j (1.tt�..`•�F� 6 •'�,� �„"�C� - x'�ya{- � . >•s._,-re Tx��. y Mf n t', �•'_ '�,�i `=iY �"�'• �,'L'�`r% •t•� -'1'rs�.. - .. -'' ,:'1,. �•:�LP�. � --rs �Y .r'tiLa�.�c'8.'4~- ..•�.Y..��"ty✓ � ,r�. - ,.f'�' • �_-_ >,..>�•_.m• � ,a'i JJA-Yam. �..r �`�d-n` ` !1' 1'. .f+ •i��.4�^� r� •, �'• d VA: �Vr'1�.• i�{�^�- f r�'.;:;�:•-`.r��'`••' .r�•�.,i y -•.i.. rr' L•t. J•a' � ' _ t � �i • �Y•',:P"' •� � • - ML ,r/f IY r'YJV . � +�•..,�a��-��r�d ;^ ,�--v t�+� +` ti.3`�Y C .� �r_ �'��'�Y.:ar.r � y ,,,•'`'!! "' t� �+a'fir '``.'•��y Za' �-. , ICI 1r t: t s k. . .� J .P+' j 6„� s r.1' f �; ..Tst' ^ ''-y iF. - •`�, 4 �„ 4�ar 1•y a.=ti !3S?.`. i J, s.fT ,.'r•� J� r Y �..+-•nt tr ZZ.I aim' ♦ ,terA -!�603- ,�Z��j UN R9 7 f�A�K 4' Z.A. Vj� M�q f 3 N�. I 7r, is fo 41 1�;M_IXAk__ 1;e 41 Ar Aw" q.,�j. pP. 1&44 RZ7A. 1,MCI g o Ali tiff w P-1 man-smals APPENDIX E FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Steeet Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 516-288-2480 516-288-2544 Fax March 29, 1999 Ms. Theresa Elkowitz Freudenthal &Elkowitz Consulting Group,Inc. 368 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, New York 11725 Re: Mullen Motors Parking Field Expansion S/E Corner Main Road at Cottage Place Town of.Southold,New York Dear Ms. Elkowitz: As requested,we have completed our Traffic Engineering Examination of the proposed parking lot expansion of Mullen Motors located on the southeast corner of Main Road (NYS Route 25) and Cottage Place in the Town of Southold, New York. The proposed parking lot will provide 36 additional spaces on the southeast corner of the Mullen Motors properties. It should be pointed out that no plans are being made for an increase in the vehicle stock or in the amount of service done by Mullen Motors. The parking lot expansion is merely to alleviate some of the existing parking problems in the vicinity of the existing'Mullen Motors operation. The following sections describe our findings and recommendations. Proposed Parking Lot Expansion It is proposed to construct a 36 car parking lot to the southeast of the existing Mullen Motors facility which is located on the southeast corner of Main Road and Cottage Place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York. The property is currently vacant and the Suffolk County Tax.Map No. is 1000-62-03-24.1. In addition to the proposed parking lot construction, as part of this project,the zoning of the entire property including the existing Colonial.Comers area located north of the proposed.parking lot,will be changed. Colonial Comers will remain in its existing state and no modifications are planned for the property. Therefore,no additional traffic will be generated by the change of zone of the Colonial Corners property. In addition, the zoning change will not increase the parking requirements for Colonial Corners. At present,a parking lot exists on the south side of the Mullen Motors building and can be seen in Figure 1,Parking Locations. This parking lot is designated Section 2 in Figure 1 and is located to the west of the proposed parking lot expansion. This parking area is utilized by service vehicles as well as employees of Mullen Motors. n MAIN ROAD v . a ® 4 f I w i 1 Q U 2 PROPOSED PARKING LOT EXPANSION FIGURE 1 PARKING LOCATIONS Ms. Theresa Elkowitz March 29, 1999 Page 3 In addition to the parking area located south of the Mullen Motors building an additional parking area is located west of the building on the west side of Cottage Place(Section 1). This parking area contains new and used cars for sale. This parking lot is also used by visitors as well as vehicles that are scheduled for service. In addition to these two main parking areas, vehicles may park on both the east and west side of Cottage Place(Section 4), as well as to the immediate west of the existing Mullen.Motors building between the building and Cottage Place(Section 3). Garage doors are present on the west side of this building and vehicles for service or visitors may park facing these garage doors on the west side of the building. In addition to these two parking areas,vehicles may also park on either the north or south side of Main Road(Section 5). Existing Roadways The proposed parking lot expansion will become part of the existing Mullen Motors property which is located on the southeast comer of Main Road and Cottage Place..Main Road is a major east/west New-York State Highway facility designated New York State Route 25. In this area, Main Road provides two lanes in each direction with parking lanes on both sides of the road. The average annual daily traffic on Main Road in the vicinity of the site was 8,100 vehicles per day in August 1996. Cottage Place is a north/south local roadway facility. Cottage Place provides one lane in each direction. The intersection of Main Road and Cottage Place is controlled by a stop sign on the northbound Cottage Place approach. Cottage Place terminates at Main Road and continues to the south. Traffic and pedestrian activities at the proposed site were observed during the peak weekday afternoon hours as well as the peak Saturday hours. During these time periods the,traffic activity on both Main Road and Cottage Place was-moderate-and no:disruptions..to traffic were seen in the vicinity of the site. Proposed Parking Lot Construction As stated earlier, it is proposed that a 36 car parking lot southeast of the existing Mullen Motors property be constructed. The purpose of this parking area is to accommodate existing employees as well as vehicles that are about to be serviced by the Mullen Motors Service Center. There.is to be no expansion of the existing building or increase in the service area which would generate new demand for parking. If should also be pointed out that no additional traffic will be generated due to the construction of this proposed parking area. No plans are being made for an increase in inventory or for an increase in the amount of vehicles being serviced by the site. Therefore,the parking lot is Ms. Theresa Elkowitz March 29, 1999 Page 4 being built in order to optimize the traffic and safety operations in the vicinity of the site by removing vehicles associated with Mullen Motors that currently park off-site or near the roadways in the area. Capacity Analysis Capacity analyses were performed at the unsignalized intersection of Main Road and Cottage Place. The Highway Capacity Manual "Transportation Research Board Special Report 209, 1994" was utilized. A summary of the intersection capacity analyses for this intersection is contained in Table 1, Capacity Analyses Results. The time periods analyzed were the weekday P.M. peak hour of traffic as well as the Saturday afternoon peak hour of traffic. These capacity analyses were performed for the existing 1999 traffic conditions. YA �r�ftcltow�at � �t�vece � ra�e�, Level atlO11�MOY8�17@Ilt Ice NB to WB Left Turn 6.5 46 33 406 358 From Cottage Place NB to EB Right Turn 5.5 15 19 953 892 From Cottage Place Combined NB Approach 61 52 473 458 8.7 8.9 B B WB to SB Left Turn 5.0 4 4 1192 1124 3.0 3.2 A A From Main Road Table 1 Capacity Analyses Results Main Road at Cottage Place It can be seen from Table 1 that either a Level of Service(LOS)A or B exists for the intersection -approaches. These levels of service show that the-intersection of Main Road and Cottage Place is currently operating under more than adequate conditions. No disruptions to traffic were found on Main Road and no problems are expected for vehicles entering and exiting Cottage Place. It should also be pointed out that no increase in traffic is expected due to the parking lot construction. Ms. Theresa Elkowitz March 29, 1999 Page 5 Parking Occupancy Study As-part of this study, a parking occupancy survey was done on a Saturday between 10:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. and on a'weekday between 12 Noon and 6:00 P.M. The parking occupancy study was divided into five(5)separate areas that translate to the areas found in the previous Figure 1,Parking Locations. It should be noted that vehicles for sale in the parking lots were also counted as part of the parking study. The results of the parking occupancy for a.Saturday afternoon revealed.that the peak occupancy occurred at 11:30 A.M.when 161 vehicles were present on the site. A breakdown of the number of vehicles parked in each specific section for each half hour time.period.between 10:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. for a Saturday afternoon can be found in Table 2, Saturday Afternoon Parking Occupancy and is graphically represented in Figure 2, Saturday Afternoon Parking Occupancy. MR R TWAW .���. x.�m, €k�°��s F�x.� '" � �'s `'- sa,✓yg #?:� v'``r• �•� 8 C Totai RO4..s,33 --:���.c�,...a._: f 10:00 A.M. 90 55 9 4 1 159 10:30 A.M. 91 54 8 5 1 159 11:00 A.M. 86 53 8 5 1 153 11:30 A.M. 85 56 12 5 3 161 12:00 Noon 86 51 12 7 2 158 12:30 P.M. 85 47 10 3 0 145 1:00 P.M. 81 49 11 2 0 143 1.30 P.M. 84 47 9 4 0 144 2:00 P.M. 85 44 8 3 1 141 Table 2 Saturday Parking Occupancy It can be seen from Table 2 that up to 7 vehicles were parked on Cottage Place in the vicinity of Mullen Motors. In addition,there were up to 12 vehicles parked in Section 3, which is the section between the existing Mullen Motors building and Cottage Place. 13 Area 4 M Area 5 Room=.. .. .. . . .. .... ............ ... .. .. .......... ............ .......... ............. ............ ..... RMIEW ........ ......... ... .. .. ..... .. ..... ............ ............ ............ . .. . .. .. .. ..... .......... ........ ........... .... ........... ............. ............ . .. .. . ........... ..... ............ ... ........... ........... .. . ... ............ ........... ............. ... ..... ..... ....... .. ........... ..,......... ........... . .. .. . . .. .. . ............ ........... 00 Ms. Theresa Elkowitz March 29, 1999 Page 7 The results of the parking occupancy for a weekday afternoon revealed that the peak occupancy occurred at 12:00 Noon when 165 vehicles were present on the site. A breakdown of the number of vehicles parked in each specific section for each half hour time period between 12 Noon and 6:00 P.M. for a weekday afternoon can be found in Table 3, Weekday Parking Occupancy and is graphically represented in Figure 3, Weekday Parking Occupancy. Kr� 'fime �,; "'�y t £° -� � 5; Total 4 x - 12:00 Noon 94 53 9 6 3 165 12:30 P.M. 92 44 9 3 0 148 1:00 P.M. 93 49 10 5 2 159 1:30 P.M. 95 49 8 7 1 160 2:00 P.M. 94 50 9 6 1 160 2:30 P.M. 90 51 10 7 0 158 3:00 P.M. 89 49 9 4 1 152 3:30 P.M. 86 50 9 5 0 150 4:00 P.M. 84 48 10 5 0 147 4:30 P.M. 87 49 7 3 1 147 5:00 P.M. 88 48 7 2 1 146 5:30 P.M. 85 36 10 0 2 133 6:00 P.M. 89 51 7 1 1 149 Table 3 Weekday Parking Occupancy It can be seen from Table 3 that up to 7 vehicles were parked on Cottage Place in the vicinity of Mullen Motors. In addition, there were up to 10 vehicles parked in Section 3. With the construction_of the new parking lot,the vehicles parked on.Cottage.Place as well as several of the vehicles parked in Section 3 will be moved to the newly constructed parking area. This will help to increase safety and roadway efficiency in the area since less vehicles will be parked on Cottage Place after the construction of the parking lot. In addition, the vehicles in Section 3 of the parking lot currently are forced to back out onto Cottage Place. If these vehicles are moved to the new parking lot they will not be forced to make this maneuver which possibly could cause an accident hazard. OEM EEM ......... ... . ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ....... .. ........ .. .. .. .. ... .. ....... ... ........ ....... ....... .. .. ....... ....... ........ ....... .. ...... ....... ....... .. ... ........ ............. ...... .. .... .. 00 000 110 .10 ox .0 10 Is* is I $I Ms. Theresa Elkowitz March 29, 1999 Page 9 Therefore, from a traffic engineering standpoint, the construction of the new parking lot should greatly increase the safety and efficiency of the roadways in the vicinity of the site. It should be pointed out that access to the proposed parking area will be provided through the existing parking area located on the south side of the property. Therefore, no additional access drives will have to be constructed onto either Cottage Place or Main Road. Sight Distance Measurements Main Road,in the vicinity of site,is essentially level and no appreciable horizontal curves exist. No sight distance restrictions exist in the vicinity of the intersection of Main Road at Cottage Place. Specifically,the sight distance available to the east of the intersection is approximately 990 feet and the sight distance to the west of the intersection is approximately 620 feet. According to "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets", 1990, a report published by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,the recommended sight distance for a 45 mile per hour design speed road such as Main Road is 400 feet. Therefore,more than adequate sight distance is available to service vehicles at the proposed intersection of Main Road at Cottage Place. Conclusions The proposed parking area will accommodate existing employees as well as vehicles that are about to be serviced by the Mullen Motors Service Center. There is to be no expansion of the existing building or increase in the service area which would generate new demand for parking. Therefore, no additional traffic will be generated due to the construction of this proposed parking area. Based on the analysis and observations of the existing traffic and parking conditions at the proposed site it is expected that the construction of the new parking field to the southeast of the Mullen Motors property will not cause any adverse traffic impacts. From a traffic.engineering standpoint, the parking area will provide for optimum safety of vehicles entering and.exiting the new parking lot. After the new parking lot is completed,the vehicles parked on Cottage Place, as well as several of the vehicles parked between the existing Mullen Motors building and Cottage Place will be moved to the newly constructed parking area. This will help to increase safety and roadway efficiency in the area since less vehicles will be.parked on Cottage Place after the construction of the parking lot. In addition, the vehicles between the existing Mullen Motors building and Cottage Place will no longer be forced to back out onto Cottage Place which possibly could cause an accident hazard. Based on our findings, it is concluded that,the proposed construction of the 36 car parking area will have no traffic impact on the roadway network and therefore should be approved. • Ms. Theresa Elkowitz March 29, 1999 Page 10 If you have any questions or need any further information,please call me. Sincerely; �l � 'chard A. Strang, P. . Associate RAS:as L990269 Encl. NEW YORK STATE ROUTE 25 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION TUCKER LANE SOUTHOLD AVERAGE WEEKDAY ROUTE 114 GREENPORT HOURLY REPORT AUGUST 1996 AM EASTBOUND WESTBOUND FILE NAME 12-1 26 28 RT25 070500896 1-2 16 13 2-3 10 11 3-4 7 8 4-5 11 9 5-6 32 24 6-7 110 86 7-8 209 160 DAILY TOTAL 8-9 246 220 9, 547 9-10 288 259 10-11 356 297 EST. AADT 11-12 399 338 8, 100 PM 12-1 428 ** 328 1-2 389 362 2-3 376 386 3-4 357 414 ** 4-5 356 393 5-6 328 337 6-7 262 268 7-8 222 . 225 8-9 159 196 9-10 128 158 ** DENOTES 10-11 86 114 PEAK HOUR 11-12 53 59 TOTALS 4, 854 4, 693 DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Site Code : 98129 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Cottage Place FILE: roucotpm E-W Street: Route 25 Movements b Primary DATE: 2/09/99 DAY OF WK Tuesday Y� ----------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Time From North From East From South From West Vehicle Begin RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT Total ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 97 2 3 0 11 5 76 0 194 4:15 0 0 0 0 89 1 3 0 11 8 76 0 188 4:30 1 0 0 0 89 0 2 0 9 7 74 1 183 4:45 0 0 1 0 82 1 4 0 4 3 79 2 176 HR TOTAL 1 0 1 0 357 4 12 0 35 23 305 3 741 5:00 PM 0 1 2 0 74 2 4 0 15 4 82 0 184 5:15 1 0 0 1 68 2 7 1 5 8 62 1 156 5:30 1 0 0 0 49 1 2 0 9 3 52 1 118 5:45 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 6 5 54 0 121 HR TOTAL 2 1 2 1 247 5 13 1 35 20 250 2 579 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DAY TOTAL 3 1 3 1 604 9 25 1 70 43 555 5 1320 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR ........ VOLUMES ........ .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- North 4:30 PM 0.50 2 1 3 6 33 17 50 East 4:00 PM 0.91 0 357 4 361 0 99 1 South 4:15 PM 0.68 13 0 39 52 25 0 75 West 4:15 PM 0.98 22 311 3 336 7 93 1 Entire Intersection North 4:00 PM 0.50 1 0 1 2 50 0 50 East 0.91 0 357 4 361 0 99 1 South 0.84 12 0 35 47 26 0 74 West 0.99 23 305 3 331 7 92 1 DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Sitt Code 98129 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Cottage Place FILE: roucotpm E-W Street: Route 25 DAY OF WK : Tuesday Movements by: Primary DATE: 2/09/99 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Turning Volumes for the Period: 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM Cottage Place N W—�—E S 3 1 0 1 2 0 393 Route 25 361 357 3 4 305 331 Route 25 HOM 318 23 F 47 7 35 0 12 27 Cottage Place DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Site Code 98129 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Cottage Place FILE: roucotsa E-W Street: Route 25 DAY OF WK : Saturday Movements by: Primary DATE: 2/27/99 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Time From North From East From South From West Vehicle Begin RT THRU LT RT THRU IT RT THRU IT RT THRU LT Total ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 93 0 1 0 7 0 79 0 180 11.15 2 0 0 0 86 2 1 0 4 1 94 0 190 11:30 0 0 0 0 76 0 4 0 12 6 91 0 189 11:45 0 0 0 0 88 0 4 1 6 3 99 1 202 HR TOTAL 2 0 0 0 343 2 10 1 29 10 363 1 761 12:00 PM 1 0 0 0 109 1 3 0 9 2 96 1 222 12:15 1 0 0 0 87 2 6 0 6 7 91 0 200 12:30 0 0 0 0 106 1 1 0 4 4 79 2 197 12:45 1 0 0 0 91 2 3 0 8 3 83 0 191 HR TOTAL 3 0 0 0 393 6 13 0 27 16 349 3 810 1:00 PM 1 0 0 0 86 0 3 0 3 5 106 1 205 1:15 0 0 0 0 66 1 2 0 9 5 108 2 193 1:30 2 0 0 1 73 1 4 0 5 0 97 0 183 1:45 2 0 1 0 93 0 0 0 5 4 114 0 219 HR TOTAL 5 0 1 1 318 2 9 0 22 14 425 3 800 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DAY TOTAL 10 0 1 1 1054 10 32 1 78 40 1137 7 2371 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 11:00 AM - 2:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR ........ VOLUMES ........ .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- North 1:00 PM 0.50 5 0 1 6 83 0 17 East 12.00 PM 0.91 0 393 6 399 0 98 2 South 11:30 AM 0.80 17 1 33 51 33 2 65 West 1:00 PM 0.94 14 425 3 442 3 96 1 Entire Intersection North 11.45 AM 0.50 2 0 0 2 k100 0 0 East 0.90 0 390 4 394 0 99 1 South 0.83 14 1 25 40 35 2 62 West 0.93 16 365 4 385 4 95 1 DUNK ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Sites Code 98129 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Cottage Place FILE: roucotsa E-W Street: Route 25 DAY OF WK : Saturday Movements by: Primary DATE: 2/27/99 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Turning Volumes for the Period: 11:45 AM - 12:45 PM Cottage Place N W—}—E S 5 2 0 0 2 � p 417 Route 25 3. F 94 390 4 4 365 385 Route 25 379 16 � 40 25 1 14 20 ----------------- Cottage Place 11CS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1g PMO .HCO Page Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-6585 Ph: (352) 392-0378 ------------------------------------- Streets : (N-S) COTTAGE PLACE (E-W) ROUTE 25 Major Street Direction. . . . EW Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min) Analyst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DEA/AFY Date of Analysis. . . . . . . . . . 3/23/99 Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1999 EXISTING CONDITION (PM PEAK HOUR) Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection ---------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T . R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 0 > 1 0 0 > 0 < 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 305 23 4 357 35 12 PHF . 99 . 99 . 91 . 91 .84 . 84 Grade 0 0 0 . MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s M PCE' s 1. 10 1. 10 1 . 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical . Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 .10 Right Turn Minor Road 5. 50 2 .60 Through Traffic Minor, Road 6 . 00 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 .50 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g PMO .HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -7------------------------------------------------------- Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows : (vph) 320 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 953 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 953 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 98 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows : (vph) 331 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1192 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1192 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1 . 00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1 . 00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows : (vph) 716 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 408 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Adjusted Impedance Factor,: 1 . 00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1 . 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 406 -------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ----- --------- NB L 46 406 > 473 8 . 7 0 .5 B 8 . 7 NB R 15 953 > WB L 4 1192 3 . 0 0 . 0 A 0 . 0 Intersection Delay = 0 . 6 sec/veh • 14CS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 : 1g SATO .HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-6585 Ph: (352) 392-0378 -------------------------- Streets: (N-S) COTTAGE PLACE (E-W) ROUTE 25 Major Street Direction. . . . EW Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min) Analyst. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DEA/AFY Date of Analysis. . . . . . . . . . 3/23/99 Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1999 EXISTING CONDITION (SAT PEAK HOUR Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection --------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 0 > 1 0 0 > 0 < 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 365 16 4 390 25 14 PHF . 99 .99 . 91 . 91 . 84 . 84 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s M PCE ' s 1 . 10 1. 10 1 . 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .40 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g SATO .HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC. Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows : (vph) 377 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 892 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 892 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 98 ------=------------------------------------------------- Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows : (vph) 385 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1124 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1124 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1 . 00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1. 00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows : (vph) 810 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 360 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.. 00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due 'to Impeding Movements 1 .-00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 358 -------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95%_ Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph.) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 33 358 > 458 8 . 9 0 .4 B 8 . 9 NB R 19 892 > WB L 4 1124 3 .2 0 . 0 A 0 . 0 Intersection Delay 0 .4 sec/veh TAX MAP NO. .1.0.0.0-62-03- / 7 MARY ELIZABETH GILBERT 3650 EUGENES ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N.Y . I/971 8 - CLIFFORD SAUNDERS, JR. BUNGALOW LA. MATT/TUCK N.Y. 11952 9 MELISSA & DANIEL WILCENSKI 475 PACIFIC ST. MATT1TbEk, N.Y. 11952 G AOpp Tom R80 /O.1 CHARL ES & EILEEN UR/BE 262/ PALLISADE AVE. RIVERDALE N.Y. 1047/ Mp►� ti 10.2 STEVE & VALERIA BELICH 3/ l/ 74/h ST.,JA&sON HE/GHN' N.Y. on �vp I 10.3 RICHARD J. MULLEN, JR. MILL .CREEK DRIVE WEST, SOUTHOLD, MY 11971 12 RICHARD SE AKSTENECOTTAGE PLAC JR. MAIN E SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 SOUTHOLD, N.Y. / �o�` <9 9 26 /0 28.1: 15 /6 /7. 13 EMERSON C. HASBROUCK, JR. MARY LEE RRl 7ARM ROAD W. WADING RIVER, N.Y. -50� C$ C�0. 9�. 11764 9p 14 DANIEL POLIWODA COTTAGE PLATE. SOUTHOLD. N.Y. 11971 oo l5 JOHN PULVER .471 COTTAGE.PLACE SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 12 13 14 /6 GLADYS Z/MMERMAN B HELEN FINNE COTTAGE';3LA6E, SOUTHOLD. N.Y. 11971 do 0 17 RICHARD H. FREDERICK 385 COTTAGE PLACE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 8 9�F 18 BARBARA S. ADAMS P.O. BOX 1074.SHEL TER ISLAND HEIGHTS•NY. 11965 19 RICHARD F. MULLEN, JR. MILL CREEK DR., SOUTHO i%,N.Y. ll971 20 RICHARD F. MULLEN, JR, -4 22.1 DONALD B. KATZ & ALBERT W. ALBERTSON, FERRY ROAD SAG HARBOR, N.Y. o s N �'9s 0� 11963 L 0CA TION z RD. N. 87'02'00'E. N.Y,S. Rie 25 1000-63"03 24.1 ALBERT W. ALBERTSON, JR. & KATZ G. ALBERTSON HORTONS LA.,SOUTHOLD, MAP MAIN NY. 11971 1000-63 3 100.00' 25 WILLIAM M. CORBETT KORN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 1000- 2-03- �, 0 26 DAVID & JANICE SZCZESNY 9 SANDPIPER CT., EAST OUOGUE, Y. //942 z 37 0-A o� 27 GEORGE & KALLIOPE KASSIMA TES 86 91 188/h ST. HOLLIS, N.Y.,11423 7 8 v 22. B '� ® 00 0% 28 GEORG"' A KALLIOPE KASSIMA TES � 29 PAUL J. & 0AFF"ORD BERRY 5106 36/h AVENUE DRIVE WEST, BRADENTON, FL. 34202 _ 10.3 o 5g N? 30 PAUL J, d CLIFFORD BERRY ® -1 ?� n o2 3l HARRY J. MITCHELL, LOCUST LA. SOUTHOLD, N.Y 11971 9 J2 D g �J 1� !r 6 wv� 32 STEPHANO P1CC/N1CH 46 ALADDIN AVE.. D1/MONT, N.J. 07628 m B �U ?� 5 33 HOWARD J. FRAUENBERG RR2 BOX 60 NAWLEY, PA. 18428 O 34 ROY A. SCHEL/N LOCUST LA. SOUTHOLD, N.Y.. 11971 13 0- S.�.g5g9' O 635 DORIS ZITO 295 LOCUST LA. SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 3E ANTHONY & DEBRA L..SOTO 560.STERLING ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. 11971 9 5 pj, . ' 3 "v 37 SOU THLAAV CORP. 2828 N. HASKELL AVE. DALLAS TEXAS 75204 10.2 D R4 3 66 38 JOHN J & 1RMA NUTTER 56600 MAIN RD. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 CIO SOUTHOLD SAVINGS BANK 14 [3i 39 39 NICOLO & DOMENICA MATTESSICH 907 WILLOW AVE. HOBOKEN, N.J. 0703 - " 18 26 40 NICHOLAS JOHN & AXNA MORIN 443 NELSON AVE. CLIFFSIDE PARK, N.J. 07010 r ® 34 41 GALE D. & JULIA ANN ALEXANDE.R MEETIG HOUSE HILL CIRCLE, NEW FAIRFIEL•D, CT. 068 m 15 1000-63-03- 10.1 17 40 8 BLIS CORPORATION 8? TOPPING DRIVE RIVERHEAD, NY. I1901 g BLIS CORPORATION 16 RQAl) Gg 10 LESTER M. ALBERTSON P.O. BOX 695 56125 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 03 27_ O /2 ESTHER M. PILLES BRIEDSTADT CT., SOUTHOLD, N.Y.—11971 100 .62 0 61_07- 35 O, 13 JANET RYAN MAW RD. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 N 0 3 14 JOHN & MARY PIETRODANGEL 0 P.O. BOX 516 MAIN RD. SOUTHOLD N.Y 11971 10KOR -IN 41 15 ALBERT & RITA C. COHEN 56655 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 119z/I 29,1 G 28 31 16- JOHN J. SCOPAZ CIO 17.2 ANTHONY ZUSTOV/CH P.OEBOX 869RIE A PLANDOME STATIONZ P.O. BOX 1655 MANHAS�SET, N.Y.UTHOLD N Y. 711030 2 Zp 52 26 EDMUND PRES.SLER GROVE. DRIVE SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 I 50 55 28.1 CHARLF_S W. WITZKE 56215 MAW RD. SOUTAUD, MY 11971 1000 - 63-04 APPLICANTS, 27•i N 31 / DA VID E. ROBWSON 56850 MAIN RD. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 1I971 RICHARD F. MULLEN i Ii 54 6 PAUL h:,JR. 8 ELIZABETH H. BURNS 275 TOWN HARBOR LANE SOUTHOLD, MY 11971 W/LLIAM F. MULLEN 3 25 32 1000-64- 02- CIO MULLEN MOTORS 4 Z Z / DONALD 8 DONNA S.BRENNAN 128 LAKEWOOD AVE. HO HO KUS, N.J. MAIN ROAD 2 KEITH R. 8 TERRY A. JENSEN 112 KIME AVE. NORTH BABYLON, N.Y. I1703 SOUTHOLD, N.Y 11971 3 RICHARD A. & JOAN R. BECKMANN 8523 HUNTER CREEK TRAIL POTOMAC MD. Z5 4 RICHARD A. & JOAN R. BECKMANN 23 24 DAVID B.SHERMAN & ROBERTO 1. BENITEZ 10/ CLARK ST. ,BROOKLYN, N.Y. 1/201 25 JUDITH E. BARI(AN 78 /l 35Ih AVE JACKSON HEIGHTS N.Y. APT. 2F 27.0/ FRANK P. & BETSY W/DIRSTKY FOUNDERS PATH, SZOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 -- = ZONING DISTRICT LINE MAP PREPARED FOR TAX MAP BLOCK AND OR SECTION LINE ZONE CHANGE B -BUSINESS CHANGE ZONE FROM HB &. R40 A T SOUTHOLD TO B TOWN OF SOUTHOLD of wF D - DWELLING � U - GARAGE OR, SHED 5UFF1000 062 - 03 LK 22.1& 24.1 1000-6-1-02- Scale: 1"= 200' May 7 1997 29,1 DARLENE WIDIRSTKY 25G !CORN ROAD SOUTHOLD N Y. 1197/ 3C JOHN & MARTHA OHLMAA Al 11 v 48 REC ST. CAM,941A HEIGHTS , N.Y. y PECO IC SU1",� = RS -P. . 31 JOHN B. & ELIZABETH S/MCIK 5.OTHOLD, N.Y 11971 �` 54 'OAN ARNSTEIN /0 DOWNING ST. NEW YORK NY. APT.2X 10014 55 MIC,HEL WAL TER & WALTER NA]WAN SANFORb LOCUST LA. SOUTHOLD N.Y. Ii97! 8 �0 % EET 33-9BERRY B. d SANORA K. NOVICK 1680 YORK AVE., N.Y. N.Y. APT. IF. 1230SOOT D k ?� 97/ 97-173 'M i HAIR5TYLIST1j��plhl . —, _._. �' • I �IIJa 111)�1��1i�m �ilil�l��l��i i G' HIGH STOCKADE FENCE7LAN -' i �- 5GALE I "=10 ' i J VACANT ._ _•G' HEDGE PET GROOMING BARBER PARKIN G OALOIJLATI ON S USE USE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES HAIRSTYLIST 2.5 SPACES/SERVICE CHAIR 5 BARBER 2-5 5PAGE5/5ERVICE CHAIR 5 DRY GLEANERS HOME HEALTH CARE OFFICE 1 5PAGE/ 100 S.F. OF OFFICE SPACE 8 # if -'' BUILDER'S OFFIGE 1 51"AGE/EMPLOYEE-PLUS 2 SPACES 3 PET GROOMING 1 5PAGE/200 S.F. GROSS FLOOR AREA 3 Y _2 _. PODIATRIST 5 SPACES 5 3 i VACANT 1 5PAGE/200 S.F. GROSS FLOOR AREA 3 Y VACANT 1 5PAGE/200 S.F. GROSS FLOOR AREA 3 DRY GLEANERS 1 SPAGE/EMPLOYEE PLUS 1/200 S.F. OF SERVICE AREA 3 38 SPACES TOTAL NUMBER OF EXISTING PARKING SPACES 28 SPACES S.G.T.M.4 1000-G2-03-22.1 127. �. I 36' LIN N % �' i l IS ! I •4 �u F HOME HEALTH c CARE OFFICE . s ; l25 14 ' 15. ! - G' HIGH _..._.___..__ 'ST KADE FENCE ~ BUILDER'S OFFICE 28'MAPLE 1 o • PODIATRIST 2'3 a G VACANT G' LINDEN 2 2': -- 3' HIGH PICKET FENCE x—x—x—'—x—x • I . a 3G' MAPLE _ z SIGN IN PLANTER 012' RCH j x—x—x—x—x—x—x—x—x—x—x—x—x— NOTE: 5 •THI5 PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FROM: •SURVEYS PREPARED BY PEGONIC SURVEYORS. P.G. P.O.BOX g0g. 1230 TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLD. NY 11g71 PREPARED ON JULY G. 1957. MAY G, 19197. MAY 7. lgg7 AND 5EP'TEMBER2. lgg7. T � O 2. 5 D Co m I •FIELD INSPECTION BY ARAIYS DESIGN. L.A.. P.G. I I ON JUNE 23. 1ggg. •5_G.T.M.## 1000-G2-03-22.1 Project Drawing Title Job No. 071ggg Drawing No. Landscape Architecture C/ CLONIAL Date Agawam Studio EXI � TIN3 JULY 19. lggg 33 Main Street Scale C� CRNEI;� �)��s1'=10'Southampton. N.Y.11968 °�ce,u.P-c• C516) 283-1131 C� CNDITICN �) Drn. By JJL Date No. TIMOTHY A. RUMPH R.L.A. C516) 283-6677 Chkd. By Revisions N.Y.S. LIG. NO 852 SOUTHOLD NEW YORK TAR TOWN LAW SECTION 2650) PROVIDES,, SUCH REGULATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND BOUNDARIES MAY FROM TIME TO TIME BE AMENDED, SUCH AMENDMENT SHALL BE EFFECTED BY A SIMPLE MAJORITY VOTE OF THE TOWN BOARD, EXCEPT THAT ANY SUCH AMENDMENT SHALL REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF AT LEAST THREE'FOUR THS OF THE MEMBERS OF THE TOWN BOARD IN THE EVENT SUCH AMENDMENT IS THE SUBJECT OF A WRITTEN PROTEST, PRESENTED TO THE TOWN BOARD AND 63-3-10 63-3-28.1 63-3-72 63-3-13 63-3-14 SIGNED B YI _----- — (b) THE OWNERS OF TWENTY PERCENT OR MORE OF THE AREA OF LAND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THAT LAND INCLUDED IN SUCH CHANGE, 980 S.F. IN EXTENDING ONE HUNDRED FEET THEREFROM; OR / 10,000 S.F. IN 100' RAD/SU 9,424 S.F. 1,N 100' RADIUS 100' RADIUS 7,466 S.F. IN 5,000 S.F. /IN V (c) THE OWNERS OF TWENTY PERCENT OR MORE OF THE AREA OF LAND 13,822 100' RADIUS 100' RADIUS DIRECTLY OPPOSITE THERETO EXTENDING ONE HUNDRED FEET FROM THE S.F. S TREE T FRONTAGE OF SUCH OPPOSITE LAND, 1N 100' RADIUS y . S • RTE ' 25 A � N R � A D CALCULATIONS UNDER ITEM (b) ABOVE' N85'37'000P E N87'02100' E _- 98 92' INCLUDING LOTS 17, 18, 19, 20, 25 & 261 100.00' \ 62-3-37 TOTAL AREA WITHIN 100' RADIUS = 62,471 S,F, 12,500 S.F IN /00' RADIUS AREA OF LOTS IN PROTEST (LOTS 17, 18, 26) = 22,943 S,F \ = 36,7% 62-3-20 18,218 S.F. '.o° \ IF LOT 17 IS NOT INCLUDED,, ENTIRELY IN RADIUS TOTAL AREA WITHIN 100' RADIUS = 56,775 S,F, \ - AREA OF LOTS IN PROTEST (LOTS 18 & 26) - 17,247 S,F, 30,4 'Z =o M� C� N 62-3-35 10, 103 S.;. LN 100)' R4DrUS (� \\ ) 5g,69 54,379 S.F. • �cr Nl 1.248 Ac. 57 55 �� �� CALCULATIONS UNDER ITEM (c) ABOVE,, 3 ` AREA OF LOTS WITHIN 100 FEET = 70,392 S,F, AREA OF LOTS IN PROTEST (LOTS 15, 35 & 36) = 21,890 S,F, 31,1 7. 1' 1 14,744 S.F /N 100' RADIUS Z , 62-3-35 \ � ,10,807 .'SF. LN 100 RADIUS T — — 100 FOOT RADIUS AS IN ITEM (b) �- 0 62.6 �� 100 FOOT RADIUS AS IN ITEM (c) 50 W (� S� 62-3-26 \ ) 62-3-18 Z 10, 106 S.F. 7, 741 S.F. IN 700' RADIUS ENTIRELY 1N RADIUS 62-3-2 / 62-3-34 6,566 S.F. ENTIRELY IN RADIUS 290 S.F. IN 100' RADIUS RADIUS MAP OF PROPERTY SURROUNDING 62-3-17 MULLEN PROPERTY \ 5,696 S.F. IN 100' RADIUS SHOWING AREAS OF LOTS TO COMPEL A SUPER MAJORITY \.. _ SITUATE AT. D SOUTHOLD R o TOWN OF SOUTHOLD O R SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW PORK SCALE 1" = 50' JUNE 18, 1998 P.0. Box 309 on touk High way Sayville, N.Y. 2 H p tones S, N.Y. 11946 (516) 589- 637 (51 728-5330 With the records of.• Paul T. Conolizo, L.S. Robert A Kart, LS. Good Ground Surve),ors, P.C.