Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-55.-6-36
1 MAJOR SUBDIVISION Complete application received Yield map received U1G' Q I I as I ws Application reviewed at work session 1NF1D' 'ADO Tj OK I"ro. Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised submission received rua Sketch plan approval -with conditions -e n^R-�►�:_ `�`; Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination N-s. ►��___ ® Preliminary maps received o °� Pzuq PreliminaryEa -maps reviewed at work session I"ro• L�AJ V 1 0 -revisionsFAM cn Road profiles/drainage submitted �._I�9L [" r -revisions N Road profiles/drainage reviewed be Engineer 12 0 u1 z0 z Olt Sent to County Planning Commission AWt Wits.,,,,, ,�1 n I Inro• OK 0r3 �cr� •w .t>a,. a I�DD•I. Receipt of County Planning Report Review of SCPC report 0 M" Preliminary hearing ° %.9 Preliminary approval i 15 9 reli M pv'� zo with conditions q ex 7 ry r`F (as{) ►, Sent to Fire Commissioner �-�---�Ily Iq 6 Receipt of firewell location Notification to applicant to include on final map _ Draft Covenants and Restrictions received ®[0 04 o ': I"ro. OK Q o 0 CD i Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed goo '-' I"ro. OK Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Bond estimate submitted Bond adopted by PB lo1a319s ► Bond adopted by TB Payment of bond Payment of inspection fee Determination of park&playground fee ox�xa�Park&playground fee adopted by TB Payment of park&playground fee a Open Space documents Documents reviewed by TA IW OK & ❑ f Receipt of mylars and paper prints with 1 Health approval Final Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions Ms 4.11 so Endorsement of subdivision Coastal Environmental Corpoke...;u enviroizri,c. rl planning&permits 42 Lewis Road wetlands impact statements East Quogue,New York 11942 waste management regulatory compliance (631)653 3399 fax (631)653 3451 Board Certified Environmental Professionals e-mail jlscoast@optonline.net October 11 2001 n Ms Valerie Scopaz Qcr is 2NI - Planning Director Town of Southold � ��� � � Town Hall-53095 Main Street ��,���� ����� ; Southold,New York 11971 _ RE: Bayberry Estates Subdivision Laurel Avenue Southold,NY Dear Ms Scopaz, In 1991 a LEAF and Narrative Statement was filed•with Southold's Planning Board for the above referenced application, an 18-lot clustered subdivision on (+/-) 50 acres. In September 2001, the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) sent the attached letter to Young & Young, the applicant's engineer. During a telephone inquiry, the SCWA instructed Mr. Tom Wolpert to discuss the matter directly with Southold Town. For this purpose, Mr. Wolpert has asked I arrange a meeting with you or your representatives because I prepared the original LEAF and Narrative, which included water resource information requested in the SCWA scoping list. Please contact either Tom or me to arrange a time and date unless it is more convenient to - discuss this matter over the phone or let us know by letter what information you require. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. We would be pleased to provide Southold and/or the SCWA with additional information but do not want to overburden the planning or SEQRA review processes with redundant 'reports. Thank you. V t 1 yo s, Jef Seeman, CEP REM Co al Environmental Corporation f FAX MESSAGE FROM: Coastal Environmental Corporation environmental planning&permits 42 Lewis Road wetlands impact statements East Quogue,New York 11942 waste management regulatory compliance (631)653 3399 fax (631)653 3451 Board Certified Environmental Professionals e-mail jlscoast@optonline.net DATE: k�j � " TO: FAX NO.: / J— 3&4� SUBJECT: t NO.OF PAGES: CC RE:Bayberry Estates @ Laurel Avenue,Southold Dear Valerie, The following fax concerns a request for direction regarding a recent letter we received from SCWA. We understand you are VERY busy and if you cannot meet with us please lets us know how we may proceed. Thank you. Jeff Seeman CC.T.Woplert,YOUNG&YOUNG 61 I Michael R. Frank 4060 Sunrise Highway. Oakdale, New York 11769 Deputy Chief Executive Officer , (631) 589-5200 for Customer sen4ce Fax (831) 563-0356 September 18, 2001 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert oung e:Young r'�i i Cist_rander Avenue Rverhead, NY 11901 Re: Proposed Bayberry Estates subdivision Laurel Avenue; Southold .. `��1 r 1 Cr)0_5;-6-3 5, 36 and 1400-55-1-1 DI-3r >e DT. VVolpert: The Water Authority has received your client's application for public water for the above refol encLd subdivision The environir,ent.al impacts of supplying water to the subdivision must be ansi,,�t_ed before.the Water Authority can consider supplying water to the project. -ecoi-n)ended that the impacts be addressed as part of the supplemental environmental -lev: O'fthe project required by the Town of Southold. The impacts should be analyzed in cc }�.netion with the Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy endorsed by tfi_ Tot,n and the water service area map adopted by the 'Town in July, 2000. The enclosed scopirg checklist provides a framework for conducting such analysis. `ou maY W--ish to contact the Town concerning their requirements for the environmental review. V ei-i Truly yours-,.-,----,, of �T1cha;l R. Frai]k i�r-ios.�re Scoping Checklist I. Cover Sheet A. Indicate whether draft, supplemental or final EIS B. Name or other descriptive title of the project C. Location of the project D. Name and address of the lead agency which required preparation of the statement and the name and telephone number of a person at the agency to be contacted for further information E. Name and address of the preparers of the statement and a contact name and telephone number F. Date of acceptance of draft EIS or draft SEIS G. In the case of a draft EIS's, the deadline date by which comments are due should be indicated II. Table of Contents and Summary A. Brief description of the action B. Significant, beneficial and adverse impacts (issues of controversy must be specified) C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternatives considered E. Matters to be decided (permits, approvals, funding) III. Description of the Proposed Action A. Project purpose need and benefits I. Background and history- 2- Public need for the project, and municipal objectives based on adopted community development plans 3. Objectives of the project sponsor 4- Benefits of the proposed action B. Location I. Establish geographic boundaries of the project 2. Description of access to the site 3. Description of existing zoning of the site 4. Other: C. Design and Layout I- Total site area a- proposed impervious surface area b. amount of land to be cleared C. open space 2. Structures a. layout of buildings b. site plans and profile view 3. Other D. Approvals Required IV. Environmental Setting A. Water Resources (Groundwater) 1. Location and description of aquifers and recharge areas a. quality b. quantity c. seasonal variation d. depth to water table 2. Identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater a. private water supply b. public water supply c. location of existing wells d. agricultural uses e. commerciaWndustrial uses f. seasonal variation D. Land Use and Zoning L Existing land use and zoning a. description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area b. description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area c. description of any affected agricultural district or other farmland retention program boundary in and surrounding the site 2. Description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area a. Southold master plan b. Southold water supply management and watershed strategy c_ special groundwater protection area plan 3. Other C. Public Water Service l. Existing facilities 2. Current usage levels 3_ Projected future usage levels 4. Projected future facilities V. Significant Environmental Impacts Identify those aspects of the environmental setting in Section IV that may be adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed action including cumulative impacts as measured against Southold Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection.Strategy and provide discussion. VI. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmental Impacts Describe measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Section V. VII. Adverse Environmental Effects that Cannot be Avoided if the Project is Implemented VIII. Alternatives IX. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources X. Appendices PLAM'gING BOARD MEMBERS RICHARD G.WARD ���� �G � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. � New York 11971 rz Southold Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. p WILLIAM J. CREMERS �� �� Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS �( PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 26, 1997 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 DearbMr. Rettaliata: I I have reviewed your letter dated June 11, 1997, in regard to the steps which must be taken to reactivate the above mentioned subdivision. As noted in my June 18, 1996 letter, the Planning Board denied any further extension of the preliminary approval and determined that the preliminary approval expired. Further, the Board determined that if the information required to complete the final subdivision was submitted in a reasonable amount of time, an application fee equal to half that required for a new subdivision would be required. Upon submission of the above mentioned application fee, a thorough review of the file will be conducted and another preliminary hearing will be held. If the preliminary submission is in final form, the Planning Board may waive the requirement for a final hearing. Please refer to the Board's letter of December 16, 1992, which lists the information to be contained in the final submission. Any items which were not completed should be addressed as part of the new preliminary submission. Please feel free to call if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, /elissa Spiro Planner i4 DON.,%L.D A. RET7ALIAISuZF 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY �S SUITE 200 HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788,5260 ! tJAL D A RET?ALIATA PHONE(516)342-9700 -"- i=AX-.;(5l6)232-193 Dti ANALZ)A.tR ,ALIATA.JR. ! i June lo, 1996 VJ VIA FAX TRANSMISSION 1 1 1996 ' s Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Reg Proposed Major S,lbdivis'Lon for Bayberry Estates SCTM47 1000-55-6-3!5 & 36 and 56-1-1 Dear Mr. Ward: The preliminary aoproval on the above subdivision application was extended until June 144 1996 by the Planning Board in ordsr that an application might be 'made to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for permission to use private wells instead of hooking up to :rater provided by the Village of Greenport- which is not processing new app' J cations. An app1 i cation has been ' filed with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services which then required an applicaticn to that Department's Board of Review; which has also been filed. :The Department of Health Services, will not schedule a public hearing until water samples have been furnished to then,. The Department of Health Services located where they wane_ the test wells driven and the 6pplicart's surveyor, Young and Young, has staked those locations. A contract to drive the test wells has been entered into with! Casola Well Drillers, Inc. and as soon as the wells have been dtii,.en and water sampled, the results w?ll be furnished to the Department of Health Services se a healring date can be set. m this I A The purpose of �h1�� letter ,.�_ ,,s to show the Sc.utho�d Tanning, Board that the applicant has !been diligently pursuing the Suffolk bounty Department of Health Services approval, for providing wells and to request an additional extension of the time to summit the final map because of the various !;built--in delays in this application process I i I i I I I to the Departmwnt of H-alth Services , Thank you for I atti'antion to this matter. Very truly yours, DONALD A. RETTAL•IATA DA :ms I i i i i I I i I i TOTAL P.0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER SU�FQ( Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD O OG Chairman C� Southold, Box 1179 Southold, New York 119711 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. � 2 Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS � ® `r Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS ��fo� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 18, 1996 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 .& 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board reviewed your letter of June 10, 1996 , in which you requested an additional extension of preliminary approval, at the June 17, 1996 work session. The Planning Board is aware that you have been pursuing approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for an extended period of time. However, the Planning Board has established a policy of granting no more than two extensions of preliminary approval . As you know, many more than two extension have been granted for the above mentioned' subdivision. The Planning Board is not in favor of granting any additional extensions for the proposed Bayberry Estates subdivision. Therefore, the Board considers the preliminary approval expired. To pursue the subdivision approval, all of the outstanding information required to complete the final subdivision must be submitted in a reasonable amount of time. In addition, a new application fee must be submitted. The fee required is half that required for a new subdivision and is to be calculated as follows : $500 . 00 plus $50 . 00 per acre or part thereof . Upon receipt of the above mentioned information, the Planning Board will schedule another preliminary hearing. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Melissa Sp ro Planner DONALD A. RETTALIATA c-Atotzy andeounuffot at law 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY SUITE 200 HAUPPAGUE,NY 11788-5260 (516)342-9700 FAX(516)232-1938 DONALD A.RETTALIATA OF COUNSEL DONALD A.R=ALIATA,JR. June 11, 1997 Ms . Melissa Spiro Planning Board Town of Southold ....... .. :. M 53095 Main Road U P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 - 00121997 Re: Bayberry': Estates, Southold Dear Melissa: UTHNG To As I assume you are aware, the Suffolk County Water Authority and the-Village of Greenport. have apparently reached an agreement as to the Water Authority purchasing the bulk of the Village' s water system including all of it outside of the Incorporated Village. I realize that this agreement must still be ratified before it becomes final, but in anticipation of that happening, I would like to know what steps have to be taken at this time to reactivate the approval for the above subdivision. It would appear that we had concluded all other issues other than the actual preparation of covenants and restrictions . Now that the ability to provide water is being resolved, it would appear that we could go forward at this time with a view towards completing Town matters in a timely fashion to coincide with the Water Authority' s takeover. I realize that we may be jumping the gun somewhat in this regard since I assume the Authority will have to make various provisions for furnishing the water once they take over the system, but I want to at least firm up what steps we have to take at this time in terms of the Town Planning Board.. Thank you for your attention to this matter— ,. ' Cordially, DA :ms� DONALD A. RETTALIATA DONALD A. RETTAL'IATA c4ttowzy and dounizItm at law 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY SUITE 200 HAUPPAGUE,NY 11788-5260 (516)342-9700 FAX(516)232-1938 DONALD A.RETTALIATA OF COUNSEL DONALD A.RETTALIATA,JR. January 22 , 1997 Ms . Melissa Spiro Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road r , P.O. Box 1179 i JAN 2 3 I9� Southold, New York 11971 -Re: Bayberry Estates., Southold_ �;"I'I`NGr �-- 5 Dear Melissa: In furtherance of various , conversations., this letter is for the purpose of reporting to you and the Planning Board as to the current status of this proposed subdivision. The applicant continues to push for approval of this subdivision, but is still being thwarted by the Village of Greenport' s not having public water available. It is my understanding based upon a meeting with the Mayor that the Board will be further extending its moratorium on providing water to new subdivisions which I believe currently expires in January 1997 . In order to proceed further at this time, the applicant has made application to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Board of Review for permission to install private wells on the parcels that demonstrate water quality meeting Department of Health Services standards . In addition, the applicant would be agreeable to installing dry lines for . water service once the water is available and of hooking up all homes being serviced by private wells at that time. This application to the Board of Review is similar in nature to one that has already- been approved as .to a: .subdivision in the Town of Southold and as to one that is currently pending. If you have any further needs from me at this time, please let me know. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, �e-�'La , DONALD A. RETTALIATA PLANNING BOARD MEMBEI-_ $UF��C� RICHARD G.WARD � CMG Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chairman �� ',ham P.O. Box 1179 p Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. con Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �y WILLIAM J. CREMERS • Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS 41, �aO� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 13, 1996 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board reviewed your letter of March 1,. 1996 at the March 4, 1996 work session. The Planning Board, in a letter dated December 16 , 1992, listed the information required to complete the final submission. Item Number 3 noted that a valid water contract from the Village of Greenport was required. If the Health Department approves the subdivision map without requiring public water, item Number 3 is not necessary. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, - Melissa ro Planner PP> M's LAW OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5620 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 516 232-1717 WALTER MACLYN CONLON FAX(510)232.1747 RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERG ER GLENN B.GRUDER March 1, 1996 Ms. Melissa Spiro, Planner Planning Board, Town of Southold a 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 [1--SOUT ()LDT©N PLd�UP�I(�G Re: Bayberry Estates Our. File No. 12, 665 Dear Melissa: As you are aware, we are continually held up as to our submission of a final subdivision map due to the failure of the Village of Greenport to enter into an agreement to provide water. We have met with Suffolk County Department of Health Services as to this matter and they have agreed that we can apply to their Board of Review for permission to install individual wells on any parcels that are built until such time as public water becomes available. However, I note that pursuant to the Planning Board's Resolution granting preliminary approval, it is necessary for us to furnish a valid water contract with the Village of Greenport as part of our final submission. We would like to amend that requirement in order to delete it with the Planning Board relying on the fact that subdivision map cannot be filed with the Suffolk County Clerk and the property subdivided until and unless the Suffolk County Department of Health Services signs the map and they will not sign the map unless there is proper sanitary and potable water available. Please let me know how we might approach having this requirement deleted. We would certainly be happy to meet with you or anyone you might recommend to discuss this matter further. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON E-�a 0- eit-j't— Donald A. Rettaliata DAR:ms cc: Thomas C. Wolpert, PE Francis O'Malley PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SV��D(� � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD O Gym P.O. Box 1179 Chairman c -� Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. W :L" IFax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. WILLIAM J.CREMERS O Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 12, 1995 Donald Rettaliata, Esq. Mars, Sloan & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, NY 11788-5620 Re: Proposed major subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 11, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of preliminary approval from December 14, 1995 to June 14, 1996. Conditional preliminary approval was granted on December 14, 1992. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward 'S Chairman LAW OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5620 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 516 232-1717 WALTER MACLYN CONLON FAX(510)232-1747 RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERGER GLENN B.GRUDER November 30, 1995 Ms. Melissa Spiro Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Street )' ! P.O. Box 1179 DC 05 Southold, NY 11971 SOUTHO 0 TOWN Re: Major Subdivision for PLANNING BOARD Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 367 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Ms. Spiro: As I indicated to you over the telephone, and as I am sure you are already aware, the Village of Greenport has declared a moratorium on approval of all applications for water useage. A copy of the Village's resolution dated July 20, 1995 is enclosed. This moratorium was imposed shortly after the Southold Planning Board granted us another extension of preliminary approval. The additional extension had been granted to allow 'us to pursue obtaining. public water for the subdivision. The Village's moratorium completely frustrates that effort since they will not even discuss the matter. We have been in contact with Suffolk County Department of Health Services as to use of private wells and we, along with other developers, are attempting to work out a procedure for obtaining that permission. At this point the Department of Health Services has not even agreed on how we can apply for such permission,. Based on all of the above, we would respectfully request that Southold Planning Board grant another extension of preliminary approval which would run to some date after the Village of Greenport moratorium ends. We are very appreciative of the Planning Board's granting the extensions it has and realize that we are probably becoming somewhat of a nuisance. However, we really have no choice. As you are aware, the Planning Board recently approved our bond figures and we have been taking all the steps necessary in terms of the Town so that we have, I believe, come down to one issue which as we are repeatedly indicating we have no real control over. If the Board would like either me or our engineer or both to address this matter at a meeting of the Board regarding this request or any other aspect of this matter, please let me know. Our current extension expires on December 14, 1995. Thank you for your courtesies in this matter. Cordially, MARS, nSLOANE & CONLON Donald A. Rettaliata DAR:ms Enclousures cc: Thomas Wolpert, PE Francis O'Malley, MD VILLAGE OF GREENPORT HOARD OF TRUSTEES REGULAR MEETING - JULY. 20, 1995 ACTION TAKEN BY THE VILLAGE OF MEENPORT BOARD OF TRUSTEES At the Regular Meeting of the Village of Greenport Board of Trustees held on July 20, 1995 a motion made by Trustee Barbara E. Heaney, seconded by Trustee John A. Costello to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, ' the Mayor and the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village- of Greenport upon study and analysis recognize the necessity for an adequate water supply to its residents and those consumers in its franchise area; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and the Board of Trustees of the incorporated Village of Greenport are committed to improve the existing water supply :system through the expenditure of substantial funds; and WHEREAS), the expenditure of such funds is intended to insure the residents of the Village of Greenport, current customers and those under valid contracts for service an adequate water supply; and WHEREAS, further study and analysis must be accomplished to - determine the ability and feasibility of the Village of Greenport to supply an adequate water supply to any additional major subdivisions proposed within its existing franchise area; and now, therefore, he it RESOLVED that the Village of Greenport hereby imposes a moratorium on all new applications of major subdivisions as same are defined zn Public Health Law Section 1115 of the State of New York for the hook iap of water and sewer services for a period of twelve (12) months pending the completion of a comprehensive study to determine the ability and feasibility of further expansion of the Village of Greenport water supply system. ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor David E. Kapell Yes Trustee George W. Hubbard Yes Trustee William J. Mills, III Yes Trustee Barbara E. Heaney Yea Trustee John A. Costello Yes Motion carried. ww,tiew***y**w+*tirww,twwwww CERTIFICATICN STATE OF NEW YORK ) COL]N'1'Y OF SUFFCLK } as: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I Lorna M. Catus, Clerk/Treasurer of the Village of Greenport, New York, County of Suffolk, have compared the foregoing copy of the resolution now on file in this office, which was adopted by the Board of - Trustees of the Village of Greenport of said county on July 20, 190-5, and that the same is a true and correct transcript of said resolution and of the whole thereof. IN WITNESS wHg. =F, I have hereunto set my hand and the official seal of the Village of Greenport of the County of Suffolk. July 21, 1995 Dated Lo na M. Catus, i lage Cler Treasurer SEAL O�og�FFO(,��OG JUDITH T.TERRY 'yt Town Hall,53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK y = P.O.Box 1179 v' Southold,New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Fax(516)765-1823 MARRIAGE OFFICER y� O� RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER �.( `t►a Telephone(516)765-1800 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 30, 1995: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby approves the amount of $345,425.00 for a bond for roads and improvements in the major subdivision of Bayberry Estates at Southold, all in accordance with the approval of the Southold Town Planning Board and Engineering Inspector James A. Richter. Judith T. -Terry Southold Town Clerk October 31, 1995 # IVUV a 50U-i'�fCU^TOWN PLfIhl'd, 'yJG BOARD �oSUF�oc��o PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS oy� G` Richard G. Ward, Chairman W Z Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. • �-r P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald ��l ��� Fax (516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 24, 1995 Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Major subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Ms. Terry: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 23, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the bond estimate dated July 21, 1995, and to recommend same to the Town Board. The bond estimate is in the amount of $345,425.00, with an administration fee in the amount of $20,725.50. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward �?f Chairman enc. o�o%vFFo��co PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. �� P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald ��! ��O Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 24, 1995 Donald Rettaliata, Esq. Mars, Sloan & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, NY 11788-5620 Re: Major subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 23, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the bond estimate dated July 21, 1995, and to recommend same to the Town Board. The bond estimate is in the amount of $345,425.00, with an administration fee in the amount of $20,725.50. Please contact this office if'you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, " . Richard G. Ward �s Chairman enc. v� =� =)IGi_'(c=Z_'•fG ia5?vL--C� Fax (RO- o°-i o OFF I Cc 1: OI" l7li'// E�iG = VEER TOWN OF sm==mOLJ BOND ESTIMATE FOR BAYBERRY ESTATES i OCT � � �' f AT SOUTHOLD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCTM 4 : 1000-55-06-35 & 36 L,,I u & 1000-56-01-01 i SOUTHOLD TOWN I JUL Y 21 , 19 9 5 PLANNING SOARD ' ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 . 3 . 2 ACRE CLEARING & GRUBBING S 2 , 500 . 00 S 3 , 000 . 00 2 . 5 , 200 C . Y . ROUGH GRADING UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 4 . 00 20 , 800 . 00 3 . 6 , 300 S . Y . FINE GRADE 1 . 50 9 , 450 . 00 DRAlir.GE . 4 . 9 EACH CATCH BASINS 2 , 000 . 00 18 , 000 . 00 5 . 1 EACH BUBBLE BASIN -10 ' Dia . 21500 . 00 2 , 500 . 00 6 . 3 EACH i'fAN TOLES 2 , 000 . 00 61000 . 00 7 . 1 , 245 L . F . 13" Dia . CMP 25 . 00 31 , 125 . 00 S . 200 L . F . 24" Dia . CMP 30 . 00 S , 000 . 00 9 . 1 EACH CMP END SECTION -24" Dia . 1 , 500 . 00 1 , 500 . 00 10 . 3 , 400 L . F . CONCRETE CURBING 10 . 00 34 ,000 . 00 11 . 10 . 000 C . Y . EXCAVATION & GRADING RECHARGE BASIN 2 . 00 20 , 000 . 00 SURFACING: 12 . 700 C . Y . BASE COURSE ( 4" Stone Blend ) 40 . 00 28 , 000 . 00 13 . 875 TONS BINDER ASPHALT ( 2 1/2" ) 40 . 00 35 , 000 . 00 14 . 525 TONS WEARING ASPHALT ( 1 1/2" ) 40 . 00 21,000 . 00 15 . 750 L . F . CHAIN LINK FENCING 25 . 00 18 , 750 . 00 16 . 300 S . Y . DRIVEWAY APRONS 40 . 00 12 , 000 . 00 17 . 80 EACH STREET TREES 200 . 00 16 , 000 . 00 18 . JOB SCREEN PLANTING - 7 , 500 . 00 19 . 22 EACH CONCRETE MONUMENTS 100 . 00 2 , 200 . 00 20 . 9 , 100 S . Y . TOPSOIL & SEED 2 . 00 18 , 200 . 00 21 . 1 EACH FIRE WELL 15 , 000 . 00 15 , 000 . 00 22 . 5 EACH STREET LIGHTS 2 , 000 . 00 10 , 000 . 00 23 . 7 EACH STREET SIGNS 200 . 00 1 , 400 . 00 24 . JOB MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC - 3 , 000 . 00 SUB TOTAL = - , 2_ 0 o s ADMINISTRATION FEE 20 , 725 . 50 RAYM OND L . J A C OB S o :� J AM E S A . R I C HT E R , R . A . SUPERINTENDENT, SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING INSPECTOR Fax (516)-765-1750 (516)-765-3070 O F IF I C E 10 F i THE E N G I N E E R TOWN OF sctrrHOLD BOND ESTIMATE FOR l5 lea U ff 1 BAYBERRY ESTATES D f' I AT SOUTHOLD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCT 6 %5 SCTM # : 1000-55-06-35 & 36 & 1000-56-01-01 SOUTHOLD TOWN JULY 21,19 9 5 PLANNING BOARD ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 . 3 . 2 ACRE CLEARING & GRUBBING $ 2, 500 . 00 $ 8,000 . 00 2 . 5 ,200 C.Y. ROUGH GRADING UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 4 . 00 20 ,800 . 00 3 . 6 , 300 S.Y. FINE GRADE 1 . 50 9, 450 . 00 DRAINAGE : 4 . 9 EACH CATCH BASINS 2,000 . 00 18,000 . 00 5 . 1 EACH BUBBLE BASIN -10 ' Dia. 2 , 500 . 00 2 , 500 . 00 6 . 3 EACH MANHOLES 2 ,000 . 00 6 ,000 . 00 7 . 1,245 L. F . 18" Dia. CMP 25 . 00 31 ,125 . 00 8. 200 L. F . 24" Dia. CMP 30 . 00 6 ,000 . 00 9 . 1 EACH CMP END SECTION -24" Dia. 1 , 500 . 00 1, 500 . 00 10 . 3 ,400 L .F. CONCRETE CURBING 10 . 00 34,000 . 00 -11 . 10 . 000 C.Y. EXCAVATION & GRADING RECHARGE BASIN 2 . 00 20 ,000 . 00 SURFACING: 12 . 700 C.Y. BASE COURSE ( 4" Stone Blend) 40 . 00 . 28, 600 . 00 13 . 875 TONS BINDER ASPHALT ( 2 1/211 ) 40 . 00 35 ,000 . 00. 14. 525 TONS WEARING ASPHALT (1 1/211 ) 40 . 00 21 ,000 . 00 15 . 750 L . F . CHAIN LINK FENCING 25 . 00 18, 750 . 00 16 . 300 S.Y. DRIVEWAY APRONS 40 . 00 12,000 : 00 ' 17 . 80 EACH STREET TREES 200 . 00 16 , 000 . 00 18. JOB SCREEN PLANTING - 7 , 500 . 00 19 . 22 EACH CONCRETE MONUMENTS 100 . 00 2,200 . 00 20 . 9 ,100 S.Y. TOPSOIL & SEED 2 . 00 18 , 200 . 00 21 . 1 EACH FIRE WELL 15 ,000 . 00 15 ,000 . 00 22 . 5 EACH STREET LIGHTS 2 ,000 . 00 10,000 . 00 23 . 7 EACH STREET SIGNS 200 . 00 1,400 . 00 24 . JOB MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC - 3 ,000 . 00 SUB TOTAL = $ 345 ,425 . 00 + 6% ADMINISTRATION FEE 20 , 725 . 50 TOTAL = $ 366 ,150 . 50 ��S�FFO(�co PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS oy� oyG Richard G.Ward, Chairman N Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. ?i O� Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald 0,( �`a Fax (516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 13, 1995 Donald Rettaliata, Esq. Mars, Sloan & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, NY 11788-5620 Re: Major subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 12, 1995. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of preliminary approval from June 14, 1995 to December 14, 1995. Conditional preliminary approval was granted on December 14, 1992. This additional extension has been granted to allow you to pursue obtaining public water for the subdivision. Please note that this is the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, w1vow4e, Richard G. Ward Chairman M5 LA10 OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & OONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY. HAUPPAUGE. N.Y. 11786-15620 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 810 232.1717 waaiEq MACC.YN CONLON Y.x �310)V02.17,47 RAYMOND O.PERINI MAUREEN S.HOERGER DONALD A.RETTALIATA GLENN S. GRUOER June 5, 1995 Ms . Melissa Spiro Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Major Subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6--35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Ms . Spiro : As I indicated to you over the telephone earlier today, the village of Greenport still indicates that it cannot provide public water to the above-referenced project. A copy of their December 6, 1994 letter to our engineer is attached. Their continued inability to provide public water was confirmed in a telephone conversation to them earlier today . Both our engineer and myself have discussed this matter with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services in order to see if there was some method by which we could provide private wells at this time while installing the necessary water lines which could then be hooked up at the time public water is available. it was very strongly indicated to us by the Department of Health Services that their studies show that Greenport Water has sufficient good water in the ground which they can make use of provided they install the necessary wells . A copy of their denial form accompanies this letter. Apparently, the Village of Greenport is not willing •to expend the necessary fun ds.. A copy of the cost estimate of various improvements as calculated by the firm of Young & Young has been submitted to you. As previously indicated, we are prepared to submit the necessary covenants and restrictions signed by the property owners at any time. JON, 5 FA F A LITHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD A. Ms . Meslissa Spiro June 5 , 1995 Page 2 We would appreciate your discussing this".letter with the members of the Planning Board since our latest extension expires on June 14 , 1995 . We are completely frustrated by. .the lack of act-Lon by the Village of Greenport and are strongly considering :Litigation against them which might resolve the issue once and for all as to not only our subdivision, but as to others who must be :in similar circumstances. Based on all of the above and prior :c6te-espondence, we would ask the indulgence of the Planning Board, .to..gr,a.nt us an additional six month extension of our preliminary approval . Please let me know the planning Board' s feelings as to this; matter and if' they are inclined not to grant an additional extension if i might address them at a public meeting prior to June. 14.,' 1995 Thank you for your courtesies in this matter. Cordially, MARS.;' SLOANE & CONLON DonAld . A. Rettaliata DAR•mj> Enclosures cc: Thomas C . Wolpert, PE 1411a e ogpeel�06, INCOAPORATEO IM NEW 111CORPOAATION APAiL),leea DISTRICT SUPRR INTENDENT OF UTILITIES MAYOR A&INCOAPOAATION UNDER(1069(4LL LAW MAY 2e,1944 JOHN J."JACK"BECHT DAV1D E.KAPELJ ASSISTANT SUPERINTENORNT•ELECTRIC AR71j,iUR J,APICIILLO ...1 TRUSTHE9 Iy l3 I S 1. uTCLITY OFFICE JOHN A.COSTELLO L rx"" (S16)477.1748 GEORGH W.HUBBARD ,.u..,. w'" FaA(516)477-1707 WILLIAM J.MILLS 111 236THIRD STRErr POWER PLAINT ROBERT I_WHrM SR. ORSENPORT,NEW YORK 11944; (:16)477.0172 December 6, 1994 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert , P.E. Young & Young Planning , Engineering & Land Surveying 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Bayberry Estates at Southold, T/O Southold hew York .H . S.-Ref . No. : 92-038 Dear Mr. Wolpert : We can not provide you with public water to the above referenced ' project. Very t lx xours, ohn J. Becht Superintendent of Utilities JJB: fka wp. 12 . 94 cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. Valerie Marvin, Village Attorney BE'C 81 Over 100 Years of Community Service WMIA-026 (Rev. 3/94 ) SUFFO.LK COUNTY DEPARTMENT C>F. HEALTH SEnVIC.ES "•. s`��*: _ .•. OF-710E OF WATER AND WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SUFFOLI', COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK•' •11901 NOT ICS OF ZQ -S52�'4nnw�.P7� FL�b1L'Z'Y SLJAIV7 �'QQ3OPk�NT TO: S' v DATE :- *Z .�d . SUB. NAME: 1 ��f-r C V -v�-7 l�S�Y Q,r GMz: REF. NO f l9al. '040. TOWN N4 20NIN ! / So ��uQ This application is not being processed for approval because it dogs not conform with. the requirements of. Article 6 of the Suffolk CountX :Sanitary Code. This Code requires that a realty subdivision or development` comply with the following as marked: [ ) parcels to be served by puinlic water and individual sewerage systems mist have minimum lot areas of 20, 000 square feet or ?quzv.alent yield, Section 760-605, Paragraphs A. 3 . and B. l . , or Section 760-607,,.., Paragraphs A. Z. ;and B. 2 . ( ) parcels to be served by private wells and individual sewe,-rage systems must have minimum lot areas of 40, 000 square feet, Section .760-606, Paragraphs A. 5 . and c:. 1 . ( ] parcels to be served by individual sewerage..,systems must have minimum lot areas of 40, 000 square feet or equivalent yield, Section 760-605, Paragraphs A. 4 . and B.2 . , or :Section 760-607, Paragraphs °A:I ana:B•. 1 . r Y ( ) a community sewerage system method of .sewage disposal is required when subsoil or groundwater conditions are not conducive to the proper functioning of indi.vid,.3al sewage systems, Section 760-605, Paragraph A::2 j a conunuc;ity water system method of water `supply is required when the realty subdivision or development is located within, . or is reasonably accessible to, an e>:istin.9 water district or service area, Section 760-606, Paragraphs A. 1 and A. 2 . . [ ] a conununity water system method of water supply is required whG!n the groundwaters I,-., the area are non-potable, or potentially hazardous, Section 760-605, Paragraph A.. 4 . j other/Comments: TZJ fh10 11i7G -�'wl-�'�L-., a.c.-�f L-V S i d- -- Lor recoisideration, proof should be submitted that this project conforms with, or is:; b::empt from, these requirements of Article 6 of, the Suffolk Cr�unty Sanitary Code . I.� j ,. ^� tandards by this matter cannot be. resolved, you may request ..a variance from t hE_:, s applying to the Department' :: Board of Review Prior t:o applying to the Board Of Review, the subdivis ion/developmeant application must be complete . y� 17"7G Peviewer I(( //� tr' N X f1'7xl 1E•1274..4/94 i O��gUfFO(���G PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Q P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald �Ol .}� �`�® Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards ° Telephone (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD may Z3' 19g5 James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: y berm, VSA-c -es Tax Map No.: 100 -5s-c•3s +3(. a„'1 5s• I- Street Location: West- Lai,,rJ )kVt. 140' -S-OkU ,{ Vem-nf ce7t b0i�' Hamlet Location: Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated X Other -io,,d L-ft ac,�t. (Dated s / e / 9s ) Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Commentstea� Contact person: McQ,'ssaE "ao YOUNG &YOUNG Planning,Eng)neeting&Land Sumeying 400 Oshandet Avenue Telephone(SIO)727-2202 Rivethead, New York 11901 reedrolle(SIG) 727-01" HOWARD W.YOUNG,Lend Survegor T140MAS C.WOLPERT,Professional Engineer KENNETH F.ABRUZZO,Lend Surveyor J014N SCHOURR,Lend Surveyor May 18, 1995 ATTN: Melissa Spiro Planning Board Office Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Scut"old New)fork 11971-0959 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES at Southold, T/O Southold, New York (85-1482) Dear Ms.:.Spiro: Enclosed herewith is a copy of the Construction Cost Estimate prepared for Bayberry Estates, for your use. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. TCW/nas Encl. cc: . Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. + Encl. } MY 2 Rocky Point Office 12S Route 2SA,Rocky Point,New York 1177T Telephone(W)744-20SS Records of LLT LUTZ,Surveyor,P.C. May 18, 1995 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Bayberry Estates at Southold, T/O Southold, New York ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY.&UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 CLEARING &GRUBBING 3.2 ACRES $2,000.00 $ 6,400.00 2 EXCAV., BACKFILL& 5,200 C.Y. 2.00 10,400.00 GRADING-ROADS 3 FINE GRADING 5,100 S.Y. 1.50 7,650.00 4 4"STONE BLEND OR 570 C.Y. 30.00 17,100.00 CONCRETE BLEND 5 4"ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1,200 TONS 60.00 72,000.00 6 EXCAV., BACKFILL& 10,000 C.Y. 2.00 20,000.00 GRADING-RECHARGE AREA 7 CHAIN LINK FENCING 750 L.F. 10.00 7,500.00 8 SCREEN PLANTING LUMP SUM 7,500.00 7,500.00 9 MOUNTABLE CONCRETE 3,400 L.F. 10.00 34,000.00 CURB 10 18" DIA. CMP 1,245 L.F. 20.00 24,900.00 11 24"DIA. CMP 200 L.F. 25.00 5,000.00 12 24" DIA. CMP END SECTION 1 EACH 1,500.00 1,500.00 WITH RIP RAP 13 10' DIA. LEACHING POOL 1 EACH 2,000.00 2,000.00 (BUBBLE BASIN) 14 CATCH BASINS 9 EACH 1,500.00 13,500.00 . 15 DRAINAGE MANHOLES 3 EACH 1,500.00 4,500.00 16 DRIVEWAY APRONS 150 S.Y. 25.00 3,750.00 17 TOPSOIL&SEED 9,100 S.Y. 2.00 18,200.00 18 STREET TREES 40 EACH 150.00 6,000.00 19 CONCRETE MONUMENTS 22 EACH 100.00 2,200.00 TOTAL $264,100.00 * Underground Utilities Not Included . rLIS YOUNG &YOUNG �6 Panning, Enfjrneering&Land Sufvey(ng 400 Ostrander Avenue Telephone(516)727-2909 Riverhead, New York 11901 recslmile(518) 727-01" HOWARD W.YOUNG,Lend Syreoyor THOM C.WOLPERT,Profawonel Enoneer KENMET14 r.ABRUZZO,Lend Surveyor JOHN SCHNURR,lend Surveyor May 18, 1995 ATTN: Melissa Spiro Planning Board Office Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES at Southold, T/O Southold, New York (85-1482) Dear,Ms. Spiro: Enclosed herewith is a copy of the Construction Cost Estimate prepared for Bayberry Estates, for your use. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. TCW/nas Encl. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. + Encl. Rocky Point O flee 125 Route 25A,Roeky Point,New York 1177T Telephone(516)744-2055 Recotdc of LEE LUTZ,2wveyor,P.C. May 18, 1995 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Bayberry Estates at Southold, T/O Southold, New York ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. &UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 CLEARING &GRUBBING 3.2 ACRES . $2,000.00 $ 6,400.00 2 EXCAV., BACKFILL& 5,200 C.Y. 2.00 10,400.00 GRADING-ROADS 3 FINE GRADING 5,100 S.Y. 1.50 7,650.00 4 4"STONE BLEND OR 570 C.Y. 30.00 17,100.00 CONCRETE BLEND 5 4"ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1,200 TONS 60.00 72,000.00 6 EXCAV., BACKFILL& 10,000 C.Y. 2.00 20,000.00 GRADING-RECHARGE AREA 7 CHAIN LINK FENCING 750 L.F. 10.00 7,500.00 8 SCREEN PLANTING LUMP SUM 7,500.00 7,500.00 9 MOUNTABLE CONCRETE 3,400 L.F. 10.00 34,000.00 CURB 10 18" DIA. CMP 1,245 L.F. 20.00 24,900.00 11 24"DIA.CMP 200 L.F. 25.00 5,000.00 12 24" DIA. CMP END SECTION 1 EACH 1,500.00 1,500.00 WITH RIP RAP 13 10' DIA. LEACHING POOL 1 EACH . 2,000.00 2,000.00 (BUBBLE BASIN) 14 CATCH BASINS 9 EACH 1,500.00 13,500.00 15 DRAINAGE MANHOLES 3 EACH 1,500.00 4,500.00 16 DRIVEWAY APRONS 150 S.Y. 25.00 3,750.00 17 TOPSOIL&SEED 9,100 S.Y. 2.00 18,200.00 18 STREET TREES 40 EACH 150.00 6,000.00 19 CONCRETE MONUMENTS 22 EACH 100.00 2,200.00 TOTAL $264,100.00 * Underground Utilities Not Included t PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman , ^t t Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. �t ) P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Mark S. McDonald "��b. i:, �; �� Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards -l`' " 3� 'j Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 10, 1995 Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq, 1770 Motor Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Re: Major Subdivsion for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 9, 1995: i BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional six month extension of preliminary approval from December 14, 1994 to June 14, 1995. Conditional preliminary approval was granted on December 14, 1992. Please note that this is the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, q��. Richard G. Ward S Chairman cc: John Becht, Greenport Public Utilities LAW OFFICES i��✓ MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 516 232-1717 WALTER MACLYN CONLON FAX(516)202-1747 RAYMOND G.PERINI QONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERGER GLENN B.GRUDER December 9, 1994 Mr. John J. Becht Re: Bayberry Estates Superintendent of Utilities at Southold, Village of Greenport T/O Southold, NY 236 Third Street H.S.Ref. No. : 92-038 Greenport, NY 11944 Dear Mr. Becht: The Greenport -Water District Board adopted a resolution on June 22 , 1987 to :add. the above_subdivision on its lists of projects. By your letter to Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. dated De cember, 6,' '1994 , you have now indicated that%,you cannot provide public water -.to the _above ..referenced project. I would appreciate your sending me a list of all projects for which you have indicated public water is available since June 22, 1987 and the date on which the Greenport Water District Board added that project to its list. We have been diligently seeking public water since 1987 and have complied with all requests from the Village. It would appear to me that the Village's determination is discriminatory, but before reaching that conclusion, I want to give you the opportunity to demonstrate that all the projects that have been approved for water since June 22, 1987 were projects that predate ours. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON DAR:ms Donald A. Rettaliata , cc:.:,. Valerie Marvin,., Esq. , Village Attorney . _...�...: Melissa Spiro, Town of Southold Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. DEC 131994 THOLD TOWN KING GOURD L 0/ Roamlooraolut Ilil atw la4 a,t 4Pau�,,ou MAYOR AISTSUCT BUP91101TUNDENT Op VTILI r,U ntt�oaar*N U•� �wwtR oa trlµ uw�r:a,uN DAVID B.KAPl;J.1, q� JOHN).`JACK#HSCHT "^ AWISTANT SUPERINTrQNDBNT.XLECTRIC TRLWMU �1 AkTHUIt J.APIC&Lo JOW A.COSM.14 ✓fir' b , Q'S A O 080R04 W.?iU86ARD UTILITY OFFICE j WUJAM J.MLU S II! 1'rx(s.l b)1�T•I)Q) ROIJERT L WHffE.SR, 236 THIRQ FAT QRJIB WAtNEW I ORK I1W1 POWI3k PLANT . i December 50 1994 fir a' Thomas 'D 001 pert, P.R. Young & Young Planning, Rngineering & Land Ourveying 400 Datrander Avenue Riverhead, Now York 11901 i RR: Bayberry Rotates at Southold, T/® gout)�old, How York It•S• ' Ref• Not $ 92-038 Dear Mr. Wolport: We orl<n not provide ' . procan You with public at,er to the above referenced Very 1 yours., I ohn J. Secht Superintendent of Utilities i i - - Mifka wp.12 . 94 cos Donald A. n6ttaliatsa, , Reg, Valerie Marvin, Village Attorney , I ' DEC 81994 Over 100 Yom of .Com Unity Service soiiTHQ����PLANNING .ti�sv e♦-ENG .* LAW OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 516 202-1717 WA LTER MAC LYN CONLON FAX(630)238-1747 RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERGER GLENN B.GRUDER December 5, 1994 DEC 9 Southold Town Planning Board PLA`dNINIG BOARD 53095 Main Road f-AX(cA P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11911 Re: Major Subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for the owners of the property involved in the above major subdivision application. Preliminary approval for the subdivision has been granted and extensions of that preliminary approval have been granted by the Planning Board. The latest six- month extension expires December 14, 1994. We are respectfully requesting an additional extension of time to furnish you with the required items. The need for this extension is occasioned by the fact that we are still unable to obtain a water availability letter from the Village of Greenport despite numerous attempts to do so that go back several years. . Apparently, there have been several changes in personnel at that agency which is a cause for their delays. Without going into a complete history of our attempts to obtain a water availability letter, I shall only indicate that we originally made application just slightly after we made our original application to the Town of Southold Planning Board. They have apparently cancelled lists based upon dates of application and have lost applications submitted to them. Our most recent resubmission to them was on January 21, 1994. That was by no means the original application and to date we have not received any determination on our application. In response to attempts to obtain a response to this reapplication, we were told that they could not find the application. The application was finally rediscovered and attempts have been made on an almost weekly basis to obtain the water availability letter. Although a recent change in the superintendent's position appears to have resulted in more expedited review, and despite continued promises, we still have Town of Southold Planning Board December 5, 1994 Page 2 been unable to obtain a water availability letter. Without the water availability letter, we are unable to obtain Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval of the final map. We obtained approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Board of Review and recorded necessary covenants and restrictions in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office April 19, 1994. Since that date we have been unable to do anything further to finalize Suffolk County Department of Health Services requirements because of the lack of the water availability letter. We have intended to submit all open items to the Southold Planning Board at one time and currently have in our possession ready for submission to the Planning Board the following items: 1. Draft of Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for the subdivision. 2. Draft of the By-Laws for the homeowners association. 3. Draft bond estimate for all subdivision improvements. 4 . Letter from each public utility company whose facilities are proposed to be installed. We have the final subdivision map prepared and the final drainage and road profiles, but again, have not been able to submit the final subdivision maps to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services because of the lack of a valid water contract with the Village of Greenport. We respectfully submit that we have done everything within our power to make the final submission, but have been thwarted in our efforts to do so by the Village of Greenport. If the Board would want us to submit all of the other documentation other than the final map without the Suffolk County Health Department stamp, we are prepared to so. We would respectfully request an additional extension of time to finalize the map. If the Board does not feel that it is appropriate to grant an additional six-month extension of the preliminary approval, we would appreciate such shorter additional time as it would determine appropriate. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, MARS, S LOANE & C��..O��.NLON'E�)r'.44a �� DAR:ms Donald A. Rettaliata cc: Young and Young 4 ' ' t 11VATL1IBTLITY OF CABLE_TV FACILITIES �"TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN PLA14NING BOARD P.O. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD. N..Y. 11971 FROM: CABLEVISION OF RIVERHEAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 201 OLD COUNTRY ROAD RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 SUBDIVISION NAME: LOCATION: 0 DEAR BOARD MEMBERS : WE HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THE ABOVE CAPTIONED PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLAT. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT WE WILL INSTALL CABLE TV FACILITIES TO THE LOTS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION PLAT. [ ] THERE ARE EXISTING CABLE FACILITIES PASSING THIS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION WHICH WILL SERVE ALL PROPOSED LOTS. ` HERE ARE EXISTING CABLE TV FACILITIES PASSING THIS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION. NEW- UNDERGROUND FACILITIES WILL HAVE TO BE PROVIDED. [ ] THERE, ARE 110 EXISTING CABLE TV FACILITIES PASSING THIS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION. NEW UNDERGROUND FACILITIES WILL HAVE TO BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR THE FUTURE PROVISION OF SERVICE TO ALL PROPOSED LOTS . SINCERELY, Frank Snider Engineering Supervisor DATE: Cablevision of Long Island, East End System JD-029—L airL DEC 2199.E CABLEV � s� o ISION St7i3"fi t Il?, ,p+r�" 1 Old Country Road, Riverhead, New York 11901 I'La.NN!s�!G DN,, (516) 727-6300 �, a \ n PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS f M1 Richard G.Ward, Chairman t;,.` ;:'�:y an Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. ti, i`"'� P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. d,''=<:.: yr;,;; Southold, New York 11971 F Fax(516)765-3136 Mark S. McDonald '� L. 4: Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 13, 1994 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6=35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board and the Town Attorney have reviewed your letter in regard to forming a Homeowners Association for the roads, drainage. areas' and open space areas in the above mentioned subdivision. ( It is noted that you are pursuing dedication of the open space areas and such areas may not be included in the Homeowners Association. ) The Planning Board is not in favor of waiving the requirement for the Homeowners Association. Please note that the Town is not requiring that the Homeowners Association include a prospectus . I apologize for the delay- in responding to your letter. Please call me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Melissa Spiro Planner PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman Town Hall,53095'Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. __ Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD_ I May 10, 1994 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Re: Major Subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by"the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 9, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional six month extension of preliminary approval from June 14, 1994 to December 14, 1994. Conditional preliminary approval was granted on December 14, 1992. Please note that this additional extension is the last extension that the Planning Board Will be granting. `. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, - Richard G. Ward 05 Chairman LAW OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON (/ 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY . HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 516 232-1717 RAYMOND G.PERINI WALTER MACLYN CONLON Fax(s16)232-1747 MAUREEUREEN S.HOERG ER DONALD A.RETTALIATA GLENN B.GRUDER April 25, 1994 Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman, APR 2 6111994 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road SOUIHOLDTOWN P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision - Bayberry Estates, Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Ward: This letter is in furtherance of a meeting held recently with a member of your staff as to the various requirements to obtain the final subdivision approval as to the above subdivision. Specifically, it is our understanding that you require a homeowners association to be formed to manage the roads and drainage facilities until such time as they are dedicated to the Town of Southold. It is my understanding that the requirement for the homeowners association comes from a fear that the. developer will fail to pay the taxes on the tax lot or lots including the roads and easement areas and that this will eventually lead to the sale of the property at auction with the final result that a buyer at the County auction will then petition the Town to be able to build a structure in some manner on the land purchased. In the first instance, we would point out that this will result in a severe financial and practical burden to the developer. In order to form a homeowners association, as I am sure you are aware, a filing must be made with the New York State Attorney General's Office. This filing includes an offering plan, and substantial backup information. This filing requirement is true even though the roads and drainage areas will ultimately be dedicated to the Town and the need for the homeowners association will cease and it can be dissolved. The cost of forming this homeowners association will ultimately run to approximately $15, 000 and this is so even Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman April 25, 1994 Page 2 though the area and its uses will be reasonably small. As you are further aware, as to the specific subdivision involved in this instance, there will be substantial land to be left in a natural state. We have contacted both the Nature Conservancy and the Peconic Land Trust as to their accepting the land and they are both reviewing the matter further. We would also offer this land to the Town of Southold for any purposes they might have or its being left in its natural state by them. In writing this letter we are assuming that .the land to be left in its natural state will be somehow resolved and that the only land to be put into the homeowners association ownership will be the roads and the drainage areas that will eventually be dedicated to the Town of Southold. The developer at the time of filing the map will be making a continuing and irrevocable offer of dedication of the roads and drainage areas to the Town of Southold. Language as to this continuing offer of dedication could be as follows: "The land shown on this map as roads, streets or highways, or for the widening thereof, and also easements, recharge basins, park areas and all other land indicated as dedicated for other public use are hereby irrevocably offered for dedication to the Town of Southold. The Town of Southold is in no way responsible for the maintenance of such roads, streets or highways or other public areas until the same have been accepted by the Town. " I am not sure of your exact practices but to further buttress this and make the Town secure, the actual dedication papers can be prepared and executed and delivered to the Town of Southold pending only their acceptance at some future date. The Town would be able to accept the land offered for dedication at any time including after some subsequent purchaser has acquired the property. Additionally, if the Town wanted to it could accept the dedication of the recharge basin at the earliest possible time since this is the only area a dwelling could be built. Also there is not any ordinance language requiring a minimum amount of assessed value as there is in the case of a highway dedication. It is my understanding that other Towns, such as Brookhaven, handle the potential for payment of nontaxes by putting an assessed value of zero dollars on the property since they consider it valueless because of the continuing and irrevocable offer of dedication which means that at any time the owner of the property could be divested of it and there is no absolutely no market value in selling it. In addition to the other language of the covenant and restrictions Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman April 25, 1994 Page 3 to be filed with the subdivision map, a covenant could be placed specifically on the roads and drainage areas that would prevent them from being used for any purposes other than those associated with roads such as utilities easements and the like. This would mean that any subsequent purchaser would be deemed to have knowledge of - these recorded covenants and restrictions and could not in any way use the property in violation of them. I would also point out that the Town Ordinance language as to the requirement that there be $40,000 of assessed valuation per mile prior any highway being accepted for dedication. I do not know when that requirement was put in, but the effect of -that in light of the current residential assessment rate (RAR) used by the Southold Assessor is that that there must be $1, 149,425 _ of market value per mile. My understanding of the situation where the County obtains land for delinquent taxes is that the County offers the land to the appropriate town prior to auctioning it off. If the Town has any concerns, it could take the land from the County prior to sale. The developer will have a performance bond posted for construction of the road. He could also obtain bonding for maintenance of the road prior to dedication if that would cure the problem. We have been diligently pursuing our applications with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the Village of Greenport as to sanitary and water issues. To date they have not been finally approved. Based on the need for more time in that regard and also as to resolving the matters as to the need for. a homeowners association as well as working out. a transfer to the Nature Conservancy, the Peconic Land Trust or some similar organization, we would respectfully request an additional extension of time to obtain final subdivision approval past the current deadline of June 14, 1994. We would also appreciate the opportunity to meet with the Planning Board or whomever you feel is appropriate to discuss this matter further. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON �Vv_ a C(Z' t� DAR:ms Donald A. Rettaliata cc: Howard Young COUNTY OF SUFFOLK a � ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HIBBERD. M.D.. M.P.H. January 10, 1994 COMMISSIONER Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. Mars,Sloane and Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppuage,N.Y. 11788 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: Subject: Board of Review Hearing-December 15, 1993 Proposed Subdivision of Bayberry Estates#92-038,Town of Southold,SCTM 1000-55-6-35 and 36;56-1-1. Enclosed is a copy of the Board of Review's findings,-recommendations and determination concerning the subject application. Based on the information submitted, the Board granted the request for variance with the provisions indicated in the determination. The granting of this waiver does not imply that your application will be automatically approved. It is your responsibility to ensure that your application is complete; otherwise,your approval will. be subject to unnecessary delay. Very truly yours, Dennis Moran, P.E. Chairman Board of Review Enclosure :s _!,_e�a cc: Board of Review File -Riverhead1 Ms. Susan D. Windesheim ��-���' JAN 1 41,99-". Mr. Frank Dowling, Sr. Planner 1N� - Mr. Peter R. Akras,P.E. � Town of Southold Planning Board / DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ■ 225 RABRO DRIVE EAST.HAUPPAUGE.NY 11788-4290 _ 0 TEL. (516) 853-3079 FAX I516) 853-2927 fi DEFT. EALTN SER'✓ICES SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SER�I cr;ices DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Article 2, Section 760-220,Suffolk County Sanitary CoJde� 2 33 PH �Jt� To: Mary E.Hibberd,M.D.,M.P.H. Commissioner From: Dennis Moran,P.E. Chairman,Board of Review Subject: Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: Proposed Subdivision of Bayberry Estates,#92-038,Town of Southold, SCTM 1000-55-6-35 and 36; 56-1-1. Applicant: Donald A.Rettaliata,Esq.,Mars,Sloane and Conlon, 1770 Motor Parkway,Hauppauge,New York 11788 Notice of Hearing: November 30, 1993 - Hearing Date: December 15, 1993 Statement of Problem A community type sewage system is required when subsoil and/or groundwater conditions are not conducive to the proper functioning of an on-site sanitary system in accordance with the requirements of Article 6,Section 760-605 (lb)of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. Findings and Facts 1. Proposed development of a 50 acre parcel into 18 lots ranging in size from 30,000 square feet to 36,000 square feet with a 33.9 acre open space parcel. 2. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone#IV. 3. Area is zoned R-80 residential. 4. Public water is available from the Greenport Water Supply. 5. Depth to groundwater is about 19 to 25 feet with perched eater e,7 feet. 6. Soils are poor with clay materials. Mary E. Hibberd,M.D.,M.P.H. Page Two Subject: Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: Proposed Subdivision of Bayberry Estates#92-038,Town of Southold, SCTM 1000-55-6-35 and 36; 56-1-1. Findings and Facts (cont'd) 7. Distance to nearest public water supply wells is 6,000 feet to the west; groundwater flow is southerly. 8. Project meets density requirements. . 9. Public sewers are not available. 10. Applicant provided Board with test hole information for each lot and an engineering design for the subsurface sanitary system for each lot. Where necessary, oversized sanitary system to be used. Certification of test holes data also provided. 11. The record of the hearing was held open to allow department staff to review the proposal. Staff made recommendation that the sanitary system for lots 14, 15 and 16 be oversized Q -8 foot diameter x 6 foot deep leaching pools). Determination It was a 3 to 0 determination of the Board to grant the request for the variance provided the following conditions are met: -Poor soils shall be removed to achieve a hydraulic connection to acceptable soil strata to the satisfaction of the department; - Unsuitable soils must be removed and replaced with clean sand in the presence of a department representative; and -The sanitary leaching pools for lots 10 through 16 shall be oversized as per the direction of the department. Article 6 is intended to protect surface and groundwater queli`x- by establishing limits on population density. Approval of the requested variance under the conditions specified should not i have any substantial adverse effect on water quality. Date Dennis Moran,P.E., Chairman DM/lr COUNTY OF SUFFOLK COPY ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HIBBERD, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER November 30, 1993 Mr. Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. Mars, Sloane and Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Subdivision of Bayberry Estates #92-038, (T) Southold (SCTM 1000-55-6-35 and 36; 56-1-1) Dear Mr. Rettaliata: Your request to appear. before the Board of Review of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has been received. The review of this case has been scheduled for December 15, 1993 at 10: 00 a.m. , in the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Conference Room, County Center, Room S-238, Riverhead. You and interested parties are requested to .appear, with or without counsel, and you may produce any information or evidence concerning the above referenced property.. Should you have any questions, please call 516-852-2100. Very truly yours, Dennis Moran, P.E. Chairman Board of Review DM:cah cc: Mr. James . L. Corbin Mr. Richard Meyer Ms. Susan D. Windesheim Mr.. Frank- Dowling, Sr. Planner " Mr. Peter R. Akras, P.E. Town of Southold Planning Board DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY p8� 'y DEC 2 19y!3 COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD,N.Y. 11901-3397 852-2100 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTTL. HARRIS Supervisor Richard G.Ward,Chairman George Ritchie Latham,Jr. :' 8 ',: ° "5` Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. =` v' P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald 4r"��� Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 16 , 1993 Kenneth Abruzzo Young & Young 400 Ostrander Ave. Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates, Southold SCTM* 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Abruzzo: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on November 15, 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a retro-active one year extension of preliminary approval from June 14, 1993 to June 14, 1994. Please note that this is the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Si cere,ly, Richard G. Ward Chairman YOUNG &YOUNG PLANNING. ENGINEERING&LAND SURVEYING 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901 Telephone 516-727-2303 Facsimile 516-727-0144 HAND DELIVERED November 4, 1993 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES at Southold, T/O Southold, New York (85-1482) Dear Members of the Board: Would you kindly consider a re-approval of the subdivision map entitled "Preliminary Subdivision Map of Bayberry Estates" , dated October 22, 1992 . A copy of the December 14 , 1992 resolution is enclosed for your reference. Due to soil conditions, we have had to apply to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Board of Review and that process has taken substantially longer than anyone could have anticipated. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thanking you in advance, I am, Very truly yours, Kenneth F. Abruzzo KFA/sjt Encl. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. 1JU NOV 51993 SDiJT�{iJ�D+G:�ai`1 F !IPuMNG GQA19D ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG THOMAS C.WOLPERT KENNETH F.ABRUZZO Professional Engineer Land Surveyor Professional Engineer Land Surveyor &Land Surveyor DEC 23 '92 10:13 41e _/06 QS Fe:ot,�o DEC r 1992 • o� o� 4D y �LL tkrdE & CONLON ANNING BOARD MEMBERS ► MARS'S�OT L. HARKS Supervisor ,nnett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman y George Ritchie Latham, Jr, �0.� �a � Town Hall. 5309 M;+in Road Richard G. Ward P.O. Box "179 Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD .OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December .1.6; 1992 Donald A. Rettaliata Mara, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 . RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry. Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliat.a: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 14, 1992.: it was RESOLVED to adopt the Engineering Inspector' s report dated December 9, 1992. At the meeting, Howard Young, your client' s surveyor, expressed concerns with certain aspects of the report. As a result, the Board adopted- the report subject to further review- by the Planning Board, 'Engineering Inspector and Mr. Young. The preliminary public hearing, which. was held at 1 :30 P.M. , was closed. It was further RESOLVF.D that the Southold 'Torn Planning Board grant preliminary approval on the maps dated October 22, 1992, for the major subdivision of Mayberry Estates subject to compliance with the Engineering inspector' s report as stated above. Failure to submit the final submission within six ( 6) + maa'►ths of the date of preliminary .approval. shall automatically -cancel the conditional preliminary approval, unless a .request for an extension of time is requested "and granted by the Planning Board. + 11L•l: may; "�'d: l�J ly _. . Bayberry Estates December 1.6, 1992 Page 2 The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that the subject property does not contain, an adequate amount of suitable land to fulfill the park and recreation requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Therefore, a payment of $2,000.00 per lot will be required in lieu of land reservation. The final submission must contain the following: 1. Final subdivision maps containing a valid stamp of Health nepa.rtment approval (six (6) paper copies will be required as part of the fini.l submission . Two (2) mylars will be required prior to any endorsement of the subdivision. ) 2 . Final drainage plans and road. profiles . The drainage plans shall be revised lad(5ix (6)with papgz revised copies Hnginperi ng Inspec s report. are ,required. ) 3 . A valid water contract with the Village of Greenport. q. A draft of .the Declaration of covenants and Restricti..ans for the subdivislon. The jol.lowing terms and conditions shall apply to all land .lying within the Open SpacG areas shown on the map for Bayberry a.. No structure or building '. Hs: shall be placed within the open space area. The terms "structure" and "building" shall be. interpreted. as including: swimming pools, patios, garages, sheds and other storage buildings, structures for the housing of domesticated animals, the storage of boats, trailers, recreational vel-iclts, and the placement of fences, retaining walls and bulkheads. b. No clearing of trees, disturbance ofnatural sails, or any other activity permitted occur, with the exception of the creation of foot trails for passive recreational activities, approved recharge basin. constructions and supplemental planting of appropriate native ar near native vegetation. C. The wetlands and wetlands. buffer shall not be filled with soil, sand, brush or other debris. Any disturbance shall be redressed by the . Bayberry Estates December 16 , 1992 Page 3 restoration of said 1-and to its prior state within sixty (60) days of the disturbance or of the date the .disturbance was reported to either the Planning Board or the Bay Constable. d. The wetlands and- wetlands- buffer area may be traversed by a walkway, whether elevated or on the ground, provided permits- can be obtained from the applicable agencies., which may include the Southold Town Board of Trustees, and the New York state Department of . Eav ronmen't,al conservation MIU The Plannin-g Board may reicwrofac -onal final covecovenants . and restrictions upon r �. A draft of the By-laws .f'o�t��h�h�o�pe`^n���ceAssociation. This must: be established addition to the roads, drainage' and recharge area 6 . A taralt. bond estimate for all subdivision improvements. The draft will be reviewed. by the Planning Board and the Engineering Inspector. 7 . A letter from each public ut;i.11ty, company whose Eac lit ies Are proposed to be installed, in. the proposed Vutx7.:avi.sjon. Such letter shall state that the utility company will make the. !nstaI3.ations necessary for the Di.r.nisbing of its services. All utilities. are to be underground. The final hearing will not be scheduled until all of the above: items art submitted and, are accepted by the:. Planning Board. Please contrxt�t this office if you have any questions regarding the above. very y truly Yours, Bennett Orlowski_, Jr. chairman Encl . cc: Gerald Hicksont Superintendent, Greenport village Water Co. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman i'D ° �' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. °�'�� q Richard G. Ward . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 23, 1993 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by .the Southold Town. Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 22, 1993 : Be it RESOLVED to adopt the March 16, 1993 report from the Engineering Inspector. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman Encl. f RAYaOND L. JACOBS JA'`BrS A. RIGHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF " QGINEE. iG HIGHWAYS ��Ql ���� INSPECTOR 763-3140 763-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEEk TOWN OF SOUTHOLD r� MARCH 16, 1993 Richard G. Ward Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall , 53095 Main Road Southold , New York 11971 4' Re: BAYBERRY ESTATES - MAJOR SUBDIVISION LAUREL AVE. , SOUTHOLD SCTM: # 1000-55-06-35 & 36 # 1000-56-01-01 Dear Mr . Ward: As per your request, I have reviewed the latest submission for the above referenced subdivision. All of the items listed in My last report have been addressed in a satisfactory manner . I have reviewed this project and the proposed Recharge Basin with Mr . Jacobs. The waiver regarding the installation of fencing is acceptable if the necessary insurance, maintenance and - ownership of the basin is to remain the responsibility of the Developer or a Homeowners Association. If you have any questions. concerning this review, please contact my office. i cerely, ames A. Richter , R.A. cc : Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways ) • k SOO l UFFOI��o i✓SuE3�iG6' RAYMOND L. JACOBS tC=t� JAMS A. RICHTER SUPERI`TTENYDENT OF O ENGINEERING I HIGHWAYS 'yyo ���` INSPECTOR 765-3140 763-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MARCH 16, 1993 Richard G. Ward Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall , 53095 Main Road Southold , New York 11971 Re: BAYBERRY ESTATES - MAJOR SUBDIVISION LAUREL AVE. , SOUTHOLD SCTM: # 1000-55-06-35 & 36 # 1000-56-01-01 Dear Mr . Ward: As per your request, I have reviewed the latest submission for the above referenced subdivision. All of the items listed in my last report have been addressed in a satisfactory manner . I have reviewed this project and the proposed Recharge Basin with Mr . Jacobs . The waiver regarding the installation of fencing is acceptable if the necessary insurance, maintenance and ownership of the basin is to remain the responsibility of the Developer or a Homeowners Association. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact my office. 1 cerely, ames A. Richter, R.A. cc : Raymond L. Jacobs ( Superintendent of Highways ) LWAR1 7 1993 t SOLITW, F�� �E U� CD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS E:,, ram, SCOTT L. HARRIS '''Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ,•;��� ;.- �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S, McDonald P:O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Febrva r�l �-S t 1 3 James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: Y �erc�� �sCa�es Tax Map No. : 1000- S5- (, - Street Location: Lls Laure I Ave . Hamlet Location: Soot,�a Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated -Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Draina ge Plans (Dated Other (Dated Comments:` CLO"eLo teu%'ge& -z'ry lvr,v^ar MELPS QACd b.uz + •FD �¢ ver), S ' ru S le t m'o 2 4- -me &raltiw Qfect is w s sock leiEe� s Se;N� -tJ.is w11� be �c��'�re& 'rrtor -trb contact Person: /N� cs �i � YOUNG &YOUNG PLANNING, ENGINEERING &.LAND SURVEYING P� 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901 MS Telephone 516-727-2303 Facsimile 516-727-0144 February 19, 1993 Melissa Spiro, Planner Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Bayberry Estates FEB 2 2 W3 Laurel Lane Southold, New York SOliT1iOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Dear Melissa: Enclosed herewith are four (4) sets of the Preliminary Subdivision Map 'r Bayberry Estates" last dated February 18, 1993 . This map has been amended pursuant to the comments of Mr. James A. Richter made by letter dated December 9, 1992 . In an effort to clarify our response, we shall number our responses using the comment numbers from Mr. Richter's letter dated December 9, 1992 . 1) The drainage calculations shown on the map are proper., indicating a weighted runoff coefficient of 25% over the entire tributary area. {from Southold Town Code Sec. A 108-26 B. rr drainage areas shall be designed to provide storage based on an anticipated runoff from a six-inch rainfall in twenty-four (24) hours on the tributary area under conditions of total potential development multiplied by a weighted runoff coefficient [minimum twentyhundredths (0.20) ] "} . Although we have indicated some additional detail the recharge area, providing storage of 54000 cubic feet has not been amended. 2) Additional test holes have been excavated and the results indi- cated on the map. The recharge area detail has been amended to indicate that it should be excavated to the existing sand layer shown by test holes number 6 and number 13 and backfilled to to elevation 12 . 0 with clean sand. Although the soils in the area indicate poor drainage, they have helped sustain a well established, unique, and productive wetlands system which should not be deprived of its water source. The drainage system shown will return the storm water runoff to the perched water wet- lands system assuring its continued success and productivity.. ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG THOMAS C.WOLPERT KENNETH F.ABRUZZO Professional Engineer Land Surveyor Professional Engineer Land Surveyor &Land Surveyor February 19, 1993 Page-2 2 a) The perched water condition on this site as it affects storm water runoff, storage and recharge has been analyzed. Certainly the perched water is moving on the clay layers throughout the site as indicated by the wetlands and ponds which are surface indications of the perched water. The recharge area, as designed, will allow for the proper storm water storage and, in the event of a storm exceeding the design parameters, will allow for safe overflow into the freshwater wetlands system. Hopefully, the storm water laden soils will promote the growth of wetlands plants which will enhance the recharge basin both in its storage/recharge capacities and in its water quality control. It would be wrong not to use the natural environmental features available at this site. 3) The required fencing of the Recharge Area should be waived as it will be detrimental to the aesthetic environment as well as the flora and fauna. 4) The plan has been amended to indicate an additional catch basin at station 7+54 Road A opposite catch basin number 5, but as it is so close to the high point of Road A (station 3+91) , we have not shown an additional catch basin at station 2+80 Road A opposite catch basin number 3 . 5) A "permanent" drainage easement has been indicated over lot 11. 6) The proposed bubble basin (the safe overflow for the drainage system) will discharge excess storm water into the open space but will not flood lot number 11 as surface waters move at right angles to the land contours. Note two spot elevations on the westerly portion of lot 11 are 20.85 and 20. 22 and note the large wetlands area has a surface elevation of approximately 17 . 0. 7) Rip-rap has been indicated at the bubble basin and end section. 8) Although contrary to the Town Code, the road profiles have been prepared at an appropriate scale of 111= 50' horizontal and 1"=10' vertical. All good engineering text would indicate that a "balance between horizontal and vertical scale is necessary in order to portray the ground profile in a realistic manner" . Certainly the scales required by the Code would indicate a very distorted ground profile. 9) The Typical Road Section has been amended to indicate the proper 15" mountable curb, consistent with the Typical Mountable Curb Detail. February 19, 1993 Page 3 10) The plan has been amended to indicate a 44 ' curb radius at all turns-a-round. Should you, the Board, or Mr. Richter wish to discuss these matters further, we would be most pleased to make ourselves available at your convenience. Pursuant to the Resolution granting preliminary approval, we are proceeding with the final plat but wish to resolve the design and drainage concerns as soon as possible. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young HWY ba Encl. cc: Donald Rettaliata, Esq. + 2 sets Mr. James A. Richter + 1 set Mr. Jeffery L. Seeman, R.E.M. + 1 set i � 141, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS ..�M `'' Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ��,� . ,.�. _ ,' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ;" Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53M Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 16 . 1992 Donald A. Rettaliata. Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 14, 1992: It was RESOLVED to adopt the Engineering Inspector' s report dated December 9, 1992. At the meeting, Howard Young, your client' s surveyor, expressed concerns with certain aspects of the report. As a result, the Board adopted the report subject to further review by the Planning Board, Engineering Inspector and Mr. Young. The preliminary public hearing, which was held at 7 :30 P.M. , was closed. It was further RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant. preliminary approval on the maps dated October 22, 1992, for the major subdivision of Bayberry Estates subject to compliance with- the Engineering Inspector' s report_ as stated above. Failure to submit the final submission within six ( 6) months of the date of preliminary approval shall automatically cancel the conditional preliminary approval, unless a request for an extension of time is requested and granted by the -Planning Board. Bayberry Estates December 16; 1992 Page 2 The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that the subject property does not contain an adequate amount of suitable land to fulfill the park and recreation requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Therefore, a payment of $2,000.00 per lot will be required in lieu of land reservation. The final submission must contain the following: 1. Final subdivision maps containing a valid stamp of Health Department approval (Six ( 6) paper copies will be required as part of the final submission . Two ( 2) mylars will be required prior to any endorsement of the subdivision. ) 2. Final drainage plans and road profiles. The drainage plans shall be revised in accordance with the revised Engineering Inspector' s report. (Six ( 6) paper copies are required. ) 3 . A valid water contract with the Village of Greenport. 4 . A draft of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for the subdivision. The following terms and conditions shall apply to all land lying within the Open Space areas shown on the map for Bayberry Estates: a. No structure or building shall be placed within the . open space area. The terms "structure" and "building" shall be interpreted as including: swimming pools, patios, garages, sheds and other storage buildings, structures. for the housing of domesticated animals, the storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles, and the placement of fences, retaining walls and bulkheads. b. -No clearing of trees, disturbance of natural soils, or any other activity is permitted to occur, with the exception of the creation of foot trails for passive recreational activities, approved recharge basin constructions and supplemental planting of appropriate native or near native vegetation. C. The wetlands and wetlands buffer shall not be filled with soil, sand, brush or other debris. Any disturbance shall be redressed by the Bayberry Estates December 16, 1992 Page 3 restoration of said land to its prior state within sixty (60) days of the disturbance or of the date the disturbance was reported to either the Planning Board or the Bay Constable. d. The wetlands and wetlands buffer area may be traversed by a walkway, whether elevated or on the ground, provided permits can be obtained from the .applicable agencies, which may include the Southold Town Board of Trustees, and .the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. The Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions upon review of the final maps. 5. A draft of the By-laws for the Homeowners Association. This must be established for the open space areas in addition to the roads, drainage and recharge area. 6 . A draft bond estimate for all subdivision improvements. The draft will be reviewed. by the Planning Board and the Engineering Inspector. 7 . A letter from each public utility company whose facilities are proposed to be installed in the proposed subdivision. Such letter shall state that the utility company will make the installations necessary for the furnishing of its services. All utilities are to be underground. The final hearing will not be scheduled until all of the above items are submitted and are accepted by the Planning Board. Please contact this office if you have any questions. regarding the above. Very truly yours, _11 Bennett Orlo wski , 4."_5 Chairman Encl. cc: Gerald Hickson, Superintendent, Greenport Village Water Co. �' SUFFOLk • -• 5[•I�F r C� O BOG _- Prl3A � Q�rt: � I r_l J ✓/ RAYMOND L. JACOBS JAMES A. RIGHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF O ® ENGINEERING HIGHWAYS �01 ���� INSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DECEMBER 9 , 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES (MAJOR) LAUREL AVE. - SOUTHOLD SCTM # 1000-55-06-35 & 36 # 1000-56-01-01 Dear Mr . Orlowski : As per your request, I have reviewed the preliminary maps and road profiles that were submitted for the above referenced subdivision. My comments are as follows : 1 . The drainage calculations did not provide a runoff coefficient of ( 1 . 0 ) for the proposed road surface area. By my calculations, this would increase the storage volume required from 49 , 000 C. F. to 70 , 000 C. F. Maintaining the proposed 1 : 6 slope and the 4 ' effective depth, the base of the proposed basin will require,--a minimum area of 12, 000 S. F. 2 . Test Hole # 6 is located in the bottom of the proposed recharge basin. This test hole only penetrates 4 feet below the design bottom of the basin. 5 feet is required by code. Additional test holes will be -required - in this area. The existing test hole indicates that loam & clay extends down to elevation 9 which is 3 feet below the design depth of tie basin. It also indicates that a 1 foot layer of sand & gravel exists to elevation 8 . If the new test hole shows that the sand & gravel layer is deeper and is considered to be good drainage than the following will be required . All of the, loam & clay material must be removed from. the bottom of .the basin. The basin will then need to be backfilled with clean sand and gravel to provide a minimum depth of clean material that extends 5 feet below the design depth of the basin. 2 . (a ) The New Test Hole required in item # 2 above may highlight other potential problems that could exist. The amount and levels of perched water that are indicated by the existing test holes as well as the depth of clay noted in ,test hole # 5 suggests that the above referenced excavation may cause infiltration of perched water into the proposed recharge basin. . This will not be acceptable. Additional data will be required for further review of the proposed recharge basin. 3 . Fencing and. Landscaping will be required at .- the Recharge Basin as indicated in sections A108-39 & A108-27 of the Town Code. BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. DECEMBER '9 , 1992 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES PAGE 2 of 2 4. Two additional catch basins should be installed in Road "A" . The locations should be directly opposite to catch basins #3 & #5 to prevent water courses along the curb line from exceeding 3501 . 5. A temporary easement is shown for the Cul-de=Sac at the end of Road "A" . The drainage pipe extending between catch basin #7 'and the proposed bubble basin is within the proposed temporary easement. This drainage pipe however, also encroaches on lot # 11 . If and when this temporary easement in removed , a drainage easement will still be required. If this is not possible, the location & direction of the pipe will need to be changed or modified so that it remains within the boundaries of road "A" and the open space. 6 . The proposed bubble basin discharges into the open area or buffer zone with an existing low level area at elevation 16. The elevation 16 contour also extends into the proposed building area in lot # 11 . The proposed building area will need to be reduced or the lot will require regrading and/or backfilling to prevent stormwater runoff from discharging into private property. 7 . Rip-Rap should be provided around the Proposed Bubble Basin and at the Pipe End Section located in the Recharge Basin. 8 . The road profiles on sheet. # 2 indicate a vertical scale of 1 " = 10 ' . The Town Code requires 1 " = 5 ' . 9 . The curb detail and road profiles show a discrepancy in their dimensions. One shows 15" and the other shows 18" . Please clarify-. 10 . The minimum pavement radius at all Cul-de-Sac ' s should be 44 ' . If you have any questions concerning this review, or if you need any additional information, please contact my office. Aliames ' cerr � A. Richter , R.A. cc : Raymond L. Jacobs ( Superintendent of Highways ) File COUNTY OF SUF ,--_K ss: STATI OF NEW YORK TLEGA'L�NOTICE' I Patricia Wood,, being duly sworn, says that she" is the Notice of,Public,Hearing Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk Countr, r ENthat,pursuantto Section 276 and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed cc/y oftheTownLaw,apublichear- It as bCen .published in said Long Island IrwelerWatc'l�nian ing will be held by the Southold Town" Planning;Board,-at the once each week for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !� . . . . . . weeks Town -Hall,, Main 'Road, Southold, New "York in said' 3 Town on the '1'4th day of Successively, commencing on the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 1992,on the question, of the following: day o I . . . . . .G � • . . ., 19 . ' 7:30 P.M. Preliminary deter- ~ mination for the.major subdivi- siori. for' Bayberry Estates, at I . • , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Southold in the Town of "a Southold, County of Suffolk and the State'of New'York.Suf-folk County Tax Map Number 10,00-55;6-35 & 36. and Sworn to before me this ,_. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . .. d<,y of 1000-56-1-1., The;property is bordered on i ' 1,9 yv the north by land now or • • • • • • • • • formerly of Yennecott Park Pro- p erty Owners Assoc."Park and Playground;' by land now or formerly, of Subdivision "Yen- f necott Park," Suffolk Co. File I ' No.5187,Lots 30-46;on the east Notary by Laurel Avenue;on the south bythe,Long Island Railroad;on BARBARA A SCHNEIDER the west by land now or former- NOTARY PU80C; State o ork ly of Patricia Ann Mooney, by " No 430Cg46 land now or formerly-of Edwin Qualified in.Suffolk County Mooney,by land.now or former- Oommission'Expires '8/3i/qy ly of Herbert R.Mandel,and by land now, or r formerly of Richard H.Wheeler&,Laureen E.Wheeler and by Lot 47 of the "Yennecott Park" subdivision. Any person desiring to be i heard on the above matter should,appear at the time and place above specified. Dated: November 25, 1992 BY ORDER'OF THE SOUTHOLD'TOWN PLANNING BOARD j Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - -- — _ ,IX-112/3/0(11) , DEC - 9 1992 I b" . LEGAL NOTICE STATE OF t•,_-,'YORK) Notice of Public Hearing ) SS: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that I COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CY pursuant to Section 276 of the Town ! *-yy����^- Law,a public hearing will be held by I lt- (VA-)16Xd of Mattituck, in the Southold Town Planning Board,at the Town Hall,Main Road,Southold, said County, being duly sworn, says that hd/she New York in said Town on the lath is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a day of December 1992 on the qucs- Lion of the following: . Weekly Newspaper, published at Mattituck, in 7:30 P.M.Preliminary dctersubdivision for the Town of Southold County of Suffolk and Lion for the major subdivision for � Bayberry Estates,at Southold in the State of New York, and that the Notice of which Town of Southold,County of Suffolk and the State of New York.Suffolk the annexed is a printed Copy, has been regular- County Tax Map Number 1000-55-6 35&36 and 1000-56-1-1. ly published in said Newspaper once each week The property is bordered on the for / weeks successively, commencing on north by land now or formerly of Yen- necott Park Property Owners Assoc. the�C�day Of ewn9'�19 '70! "Park and Playground",by land now " or formerly of Subdivision"Yrnnccou. Park",Suffolk Co. File No. 5187, 'S You", Lots 39-46; on the cast by Laurel 'S18 0� y�(l1t�C Cs Avenue; on the south by the Long Island Railroad;on the west by land i { Principal Clerknow or formerly of Patricia Ann OUR Mooney,by land now or formerly of fl E*" �Z i9 Edwin Mooney,by land now or for- merly of Hobert R.Mandel,and by f4 � land now or formerly of Richard H. Sworn to bef0ie me this P Wheeler&Laurcen E.Wheeler and , -/ 0 9 by Lot 47 of the"Yennecott Park" day of Dec,-4w ZJ DEC 7 �992 subdivision. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the -_•-- - time and place specified. Dated:November 25,1992 r BY ORDER OF THE Vr%T T'rUr%T 11-rnAYM RAYMOND L. JACOBS Ln JAMES A. RICHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEERING HIGHWAYS �'�O1 �,aO INSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DECEMBER 9 , 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES (MAJOR) LAUREL AVE. - SOUTHOLD SCTM # 1000-55-06-35 & 36 # 1000-56-01-01 Dear Mr . Orlowski : As per your request, I have reviewed the preliminary maps and road profiles that were submitted for the above referenced subdivision. My comments are as follows : 1 . The drainage calculations did not provide a runoff coefficient of ( 1 . 0 ) for the proposed road surface area. By my calculations, this would increase the storage volume required from 49 , 000 C.F. to 70 , 000 C. F. Maintaining the proposed 1 : 6 slope and the 4 ' effective depth, the base of the proposed basin will require a minimum area of 12, 000 S. F. 2 . Test Hole # 6 is located in the bottom of the proposed recharge basin. This test hole only penetrates 4 feet below the design bottom of the basin. 5 feet is required by code. Additional test holes will be required - in this area. The existing test hole indicates that loam & clay extends down to elevation 9 which is 3 feet below the design depth of the basin. It also indicates that a 1 foot layer of sand & gravel exists to elevation 8 . If the new test hole shows that the sand & gravel layer is deeper and is considered to be good drainage than the following will be required . All of the loam & clay material must be removed from the bottom of the basin. The basin will then need to be backfilled with clean sand and gravel to provide a minimum depth of clean material that extends 5 feet below the design depth of the basin. 2 . (a ) The New Test Hole required in item # 2 above may highlight other potential problems that could exist. The amount and levels of perched water that are indicated by the existing test holes as well as the depth of clay noted in test hole # 5 suggests that the above referenced excavation may cause infiltration of perched water into the proposed recharge basin. , This will not be acceptable. Additional data will be required for further review of the proposed recharge basin. 3 . Fencing and Landscaping will be required at the Recharge Basin as indicated in sections A108-39 & A108-27 of the Town Code. 11 � BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. DECEMBER 9, 1992 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES PAGE 2 of 2 4. Two additional catch basins should be installed in Road "A" . The locations should be directly opposite to catch basins #3 & #5 to prevent water courses along the curb line from exceeding 350 ' . 5. A temporary easement is shown for the Cul-de-Sac at the end of Road "A" . The drainage pipe extending between catch basin #7 and the proposed bubble basin is within the proposed temporary easement. This drainage pipe however, also encroaches on lot # 11 . If and when this temporary easement in removed, a drainage easement will still be required. If this is not possible, the location & direction of the pipe will need to be changed or modified so that it remains within the boundaries of road "A" and the open space. .6 . The proposed bubble basin discharges into the open area or buffer zone with an existing low level area at elevation 16. The elevation 16 contour also extends into the proposed building area in lot # 11 . The proposed building area will need to be reduced or the lot will require regrading and/or backfilling to prevent stormwater runoff from discharging into private property. 7. Rip-Rap should be provided around the Proposed Bubble Basin and at the Pipe End Section located in the Recharge Basin. 8 . The road profiles on sheet # 2 indicate a vertical scale of 1 " = 10 ' . The Town Code requires 1 " = 51 . 9 . The curb detail and road profiles show a discrepancy in their dimensions. One shows 15" and the other shows 18" . Please clarify. 10 . The minimum pavement radius at all Cul-de-Sac 's should be 44 ' . If you have any questions concerning this review, or if you need any additional information, please contact my office. S 'ncere James A. Richter, R.A. cc : Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways ) File COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J.GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING November 30, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11901 Preliminary Subdivision Map: Bayberry Estates Tax Map No. : 1000-55-6-35, 36 1000-56-1-1 SCPD File No. : 1333-NJ-92-10 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Please be advised that pursuant to Section A 14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code that the above captioned plat is not within the jurisdiction of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning S/s Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division FD:mb DEC - 4 1992 SOUTHOLD T01,',N' PLAN flll!%U B0AF, H.LEE DENNISON BUILDING ■ VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY 0 HAUPPAUGE. NEW YORK 1 17BB ■ (516) 853-5192 dell ca J!: SCOTT L. HARRIS PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ,.►. r., " ,® � Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ��q �' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 24, 1992 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Bayberry Estates , Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM#1000-55-6-35, 36 & 56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November .23, 1992. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, December 14, 1992 at 7 :30 P.M. for a preliminary public hearing on the maps dated October 22, 1992. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. s Chairman cc: Gerald Hickson, Greenport Water Utilities o��sJ�ffo(�C® ® �c PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS a« = SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman '® �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. o .�5 Richard G. Ward 's '� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 �tf 1 19 Frederick R. Weber, Secretary Southold Fire District Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Weber: Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys for ICL\f 4P ft- Sf 71-AA 5-5 __35 3� 400- Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by 199.2. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours,, Ann ett Orlowski, J Chairman enc. w �• v �SFF CMG C= PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS N SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ' ` Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ��1�,( � Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179, Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: \ Map of rr,1 IFS+ups Hamlet/Locality 0o S.C.D.P.W. Topo No. : Zoning � - ej Q S.C. Tax Map No. : I OUO - _- - �,5 X 6 - I - I Major Sub. Minor Sub. Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: JUf2ZIy'i. 6�2Z[�!Z Preliminary Plat (3 copies) Road Profiles (1) Drainage Plans (1) Topogroaphical Map (1) Site Plan (1) Grading Plan (1) Other zpaterials (specify and give number of copies) P J¢ �ec�ar i J 1 I- 10 Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet CONTINUED a f , REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The .project is an Unlisted (Type I) (Type II)Action. 2. A 'Negative Declaration (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Sig in ficance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) No . 4. The proposed division has received approval from the S.C. Dept of Health. (Yes) No)� Comments: We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) No Referral received lg . by Suffolk County Planning Commission and assigned File NO. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. S Chairman •. .. . r r?(,o-L;> PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS *1 cry �" !?' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman , `' ;. �,• �% t ,`` Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �.� o�` ' °"����,7V Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald A"`'"L P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 10, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon .1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town . Planning- Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 9, 1991: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, as Lead Agency, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Upon receipt of the preliminary submission, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly you�r�s, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. rntS Chairman i�.o raja' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ' . 1 : _.:: RichardG. Ward _- Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald "` ` y P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN O���� OLD Fax (516) 765-1823 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road _ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: December 9, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action.described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Subdivision Southold, New York SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves the subdivision of a 50.0171 acre parcel into 18 lots with areas of between 30,000 and 36,000 square feet. The proposal involves a cluster concept which results in the protection of approximately 33.9 acres of open space in the most sensitive areas of the site. SCTM Number: District 1000 - Section 055 -"Block 06 -Lots 35, 36 District 1000 - Section 056 - Block 01 -Lot 01 Location: i The site is located on the west side of Laurel Ave., 140 south of Yennecott Drive, Hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, New York. Page 1 of 2 ", r Major Subdivision-Matthews SEQR,Determination Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned "R-wW' allowing a yield based on lots of 80,000 square feet or greater. The use involves clustering 18 lots using the 80,000 square foot lot yield, onto lots of 30,000 to 36,000 square feet, allowing for the preservation of - approximately 33:9 acres of open space, or 68 percent of the site. The site has been inspected for environmental resources, and it has been determined that the environmentally significant portions of the site are preserved within the open space area of the site, thereby minimizing significant environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Protected site resources include, a wooded swamp, perched pond adjacent upland areas, steep slope areas, and contiguous open space including overgrown field and wooded habitats. 2) The proposed project conforms to the density standards for single family residential development established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, in order to protect groundwater: The project is consistent with groundwater management guidelines as outlined in the 208 Study, SC Sanitary Code Article 6, and considered by the Town of Southold in review of the project. 3) A Part III Long EAF was utilized to evaluate the significance of impacts associated with impact on land, water, plants and animals, agricultural resources and open space. It was determined that the proposed project is consistent with environmental preservation objectives. Specific information concerning subsoil quality in the area of the recharge basin and on proposed lot will be evaluated through subdivision review. A natural recharge basin will be utilized to avoid excavation of clayey soils and create additional natural areas. For Further Information: _ Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Comrrdssioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Southold Town Trustees Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Page 2 of 2 r COD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS em 4 �f SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �igi�, ` '�� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �,( �^ , `8® Richard G. Ward `� ' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHeOf LD Fax (516) 765-1823 vo�e�►-r►bet- q 19�12. James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: &y Lxr(ly kS'�4+es Tax Map No. : 1000- YS-r,L 35j,3 „d 5b- I- Street Location: West- side Lg,,r I Avenve Hamlet Location: 'Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated �( Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated /o / g, /9,�, ) Final Subdivision Map (Dated >C Road Profiles (Dated iv /2Z /912 ) Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other .(Dated Comments: I Z I Acoen+ �} Contact Person: jQ II SS &IRO a PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman T; �: ':` Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward x: '' Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald ~r'' P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 10, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The. following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 9, 1991: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, .acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, as Lead Agency, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Upon receipt of the preliminary submission, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very trul yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. S Chairman CZ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS `n �'"'`'^` �• rr, SCOTT L. HARRIS ; Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald "` P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNINGOWOLD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN Fax (516) 765-1823 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road _ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: December 9, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law, The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Subdivision Southold, New York SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves the subdivision of a 50.0171 acre parcel into 18 lots with areas of between 30,000 and 36,000 square feet. The proposal involves a cluster concept which results in the protection of approximately 33.9 acres of open space in the most sensitive areas of the site. SCTM Number: District 1000 -Section 055 - Block 06 -Lots 35, 36 District 1000 - Section 056 - Block 01 -Lot 01 Location: The site is located on the west side of Laurel Ave., 140 south of Yennecott Drive, Hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, New York. Page 1 of 2 - ---...._,,::_.mow.�,• — - - .- _ :,.:.:� :::�.:..,..�.�.:. .:------- Major Subdivision-Matthews SEQR Determination Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of..the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned."R-80" allowing a yield based on lots of 80,000 square feet or greater. The use involves clustering 18 lots using the 80,000 square foot lot yield, onto lots of 30,000 to 36,000 square feet, allowing for the preservation of approximately 33.9 acres of open space, or 68 percent of the site. The site has been inspected for environmental resources, and it has been determined that the environmentally significant portions of the site are preserved within the open space area of the site, thereby minimizing significant environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Protected site resources include, a wooded swamp, perched pond adjacent upland areas, steep slope areas, and contiguous open space including overgrown field and wooded habitats. 2) The proposed project conforms to the density standards for single family residential development established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, in order to protect groundwater. The project is consistent with groundwater management"guidelines as outlined in the 208 Study, SC Sanitary Code Article 6, and considered by the Town of Southold in review of the project. 3) A Part III Long EAF was utilized to evaluate the significance of impacts associated with impact on land, water, plants and animals, agricultural resources and open space. It was determined that the proposed project is.consistent with environmental preservation objectives. Specific information concerning subsoil quality in the area of the recharge basin and on proposed lot will be evaluated through subdivision review. A natural recharge basin will be utilized to avoid excavation of clayey soils and create additional natural areas. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board _ Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Comrriissioner-'Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Southold Town Trustees Judith T. Terry."Town Clerk Page 2 of 2 , CRAMER, �'C�Y�f��{� �' l GCIATES IleENVIRO1dP�yi;^l�' ��«,,j� G CJ1�,,�1L`�.,a i a November 12, 1001 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town :-fall, 53095 iyiain Road P.O. Box 1179 a d Southold, Nit 11971NOV Re: Bayberry Estates SCTN4 1000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Benny: - a cei of•.r• Ir uth .si'7 t n + , . ill P •� r'; h � +1r;J Yy:A1� � rt, �ie ar., i.� e,,...pt c ;;�..r aatlGt.�.s,.ti.G.� town �+c. „�: .•it r..y;y.� ._f t:rw �....;� � a a.,� a with r. 1 t i n 'err q p 'P i all, ..'it,i reg�.rtr11L ille ao{ �•�, /•::tt>'.. .v�;, ,,rc�;�,c. . '�r„ .:,,;,, .:�_,. • _ �., :.;,�;• i�.1.��.i • .,-�.., a;l at th'• t11Tls' find that o-i C rir� r fi tr r 1 ( t -'S n ,� 'i 7 ;�ntq? addressed. t. . .at t.,i•.,t i o..,. rn,cam. + nc_.rn '�i h ;.<a_ .tit �_c..� �,e0u�:,_Ly ��u=�iY ed, ty o L' resources ,. the • ` o th prtop-'.sSC_::i south rech'�,1V-t y.)+` in This rnat r � ts�,tizn:, \.,t tc':, L�.�1 a�.S ,11 iL.+•�3C1'31 f J- al. ��'. �.11 L?x c=;i and Lot I on the. Olilst.er plan. 7 p, Oric'i;lal I11 '_:�'s?"r���;SC? � ' r`'a/<�:11iCflC;�tnis following: •'Thc w:t:arids is undLr1,Lin witb CKnauicc silt loans,whica rcf.a ris gn:flc2•s,t rr.Cist�arc. T�sC sou u:.cy i. "Pro `. y. + t., 5 t r" s ocla. iA 1_ k -- v•t; + ._r u rZ.oV 1:1C11ca,__ that t:l'.r P.fC SC�'Cl':L• .C1,�.r1Y.it,CPit uCt:3i?1$ .aS (i:i3 31 , G:jv rr_tl3rt,'S, l'il:t- Yt17.t:.Ilt s ams are lccatcd Nithin the`elands and in arcas boll :w fent `i,4'::f'i.:�j� in li;e`XCSterP..":r nor.}i eCatraf areao{the 5i1"_ iuHap', ary"un 7c'ee ar al arC identi"Icd a5nit C Y.'1t7oll t ■ b.n 9 IjI .r` f-. dir +• �7 "� a«+ rn..r:,;rt.• C • j , r, u. xn-spcction U dwc arca swroun ,T"i is:.it ,flul s ealat:I:S lzt Cam c• -s'-'1r ss;u tl' li%.11it� �t t:i intcr.wr6on or L. urcl Avi.plic and Ii- .ir.Road (sou!h of the s:W), nd a(Grc%'a 5 Clliilc"'At�:e: , aori•L of the Site. the prvs'cncc of f oltVin-fud icc watcr st!cam.; nc- th.'nd soil of t C.siie,cou-I.-A with the poorly draiilCli SUtl$unCl ictCrrtiittCnt streams iticntif cri in dkl Sall 3ll1 't`v C'a the site 1: tiI#,strongly S►a�CSts it F:CC::f",Cv SiCC:II`1 05 59117iy !.tllf:�CXtt:lt$itrC€74I'ctiC�k'atCi sdj.dl:l<t:l, ;)(";'i1l:`�t�l+�s3;.1it5 Oi • d(zignated Wetlands dc-pined on the Taiap, Accords-I ly this$fsQt:ld IN,- co.'.-,,sWAccrc,I in ts1C contL:hi of site ruse." np p y. �j /� �y(• q •/+ /� y l The p rest-n e of e_�tensi�{ve pf;rc!i,-d �Y'?�ter 1.�4'T)-.-.L!*!' Y�port;on o 1� w� I�.� ,�a� 3r �. •f t• k• s:14 ` art. sari the rPc;arbe 1:<tsiri. ,..n�� Lot 111, h�=s t.Ut bFe:1 rollsit�e,L�fe, �u,•i,;,; analysis fads tllgir �;-, 7 r tt! 4 r. ,, a o 1.al:l � ' 'C=£t ,:1-, iI lr^�.C? p� l ti regional gro�nc<.,r�. er ,rl . ration 1.., ap g-oxiP,uiatt ,r l e $.,,,, evell Bor;r.�_ cord:ctY d d;rich s. 0 �: $1,.- • JiC rC rd n sltt (an t , i n tiles :�:'�tlf'1:1�1�.ti?,air{�tba.;ICi'�i !air ?i3C�AC ite erCl'+ed w•'at::tXt•.ieht a.. :::] i~i?w4llC;>:s of �7;�'()Xi;it�iuJ i3.J�,c;t �tboth,t?h:CCl Based upon this and pe,Cined s`' 3 activiIN,:ou1" o i0 :*e' there notan, Yale, beneath L1_ recharge basin and Lot I.a, wiicl" ul y b mi.t of t lj 3vs ;Ye� consequently, s/aou .11 ex-av ton ocxu: or t e rcch�, Zi i . y s ri?< '�i�+ °C)uld "Q' tiii,:)',,_v e'-c •L•1" t r �� tl7t, S ('•t .t tt'Icl a si"i� t!1 S'v! 1: ( �r ���' ?�l.reted.- Adds !oral test bc-,rinss could '7-1 corisider d i.^, .5;p arp o to �� d ^t rmin p-c�s e rc�i1: � n G �j-'nd j . r-acr, tl'S� tJ:ip1G`i7eC1U( 1 1,.t�:J 11 to clete t ? M�:t . ti .?t �Li1S�JiI ^1.i�1 •rt, t It ik •t ' r' e 1 Mj: t `.1 i'rr�:.ry rl �,.. d1 1v to t •a,•( •' , i li? •� 1 ;n t�:er_b� i:.,n.ft:.,.. ,rj:;_;jol pr_r it .._ „a r. ,-�.r? c.lt<_, �a;:pc t,:� ;.ut,t1?c;r, ; i!:`, 1_!nrir."S wV ri ,. be • r.,r di ivCl l:y:�I •'.. .L%tiii to tb•S ti+r11U L1 i.l Ci+:ltAt:' ^; '(' �, � �' r=- ��ir� t0 iUllji `r s� c,tti b' ;! 0.`l Gtt ; S!�Ii;,Cti r:i�°.;, tl• e'Ja L 54.2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER F!ACE, NY 117�,. (516) 331•1455 r pos S-71 t O catch basins, and t yy /ten^ r'• de n ov.z fk to fl-3 7�}^ .a f �L a ,pV{J�Sl U(�i[�/L�!OT ��L Ciil Vl �C4J-„v� 6.:34 24 1.4t.1�\..1.�+��JSA'�O+LIi�•f�V�u G:� l.' llv - ••�f �..{'v ��+1�L11 :�v Vi •�iti,• U'epr�ssion. A be - of l �b./ 4�`r•je�d to %Teall cl s r7 / 1 1�{�llY Z1 l� l 1 st, -,s1ir:n r;o: to i L e ! C �.�.� �� 11 ,. 'M �•. �a,l L.i. ... �e over flcl.v to wetlands. A4 leas; two inC/{.ds of Li-,stcJV-i� � . -= L.{:� , �•:,�.� _ i - modification would 'r i reducing lot 5iz:'s t:�,�36,00(1 �I-:_rz� eZ ra0 14 mai. a Cl C^r !w. ..�•�^ rr i /y east), { }•"l r p provide ',� s-. • 4 ♦+� ff'YT rx l/1^iT. r 'Lot road (and/or A-no .r�� lots to \ast , Jn or le to C•;'SI. a J�:tl:1 =G.�� area :v+ Telo atio� f 111 to the area just west of Lot 10. The road rigkt-of-,;ray fora "tap" '^ tiP aldiacent „¢., erf.• r iri o l t" 7 f ecs2 {Zi ti:a +�� ? '1 7 e i-,- 1.7 ,c� l ^- ^,'. b,. al should lie :o d„d ,.ncl coy�c:�e tau:it i. nec•� ,.��;; >:. �. . J._�..t 1 :. >> s. a .-esd _ private drive via a `80Avariance until such ti►,, as -t e "Tar:" Is necessar . Please leviex! these cor.�,err,5 and tall to ua:-{::'t.,s .<i1.} •. -_y�.-u are i.� a.-T.....Jst. II,Y, the .`� A a O r i..] 1 a.1 • 0 6-.� b n ♦ 1 w J ) T,. applicant 517s�cld contacted and rol.ill�d o3 tile r�.�;1 ?� rv�'is el.� U.�r;:- rz.� :�it III, Or provip s r rn ('( ((� n (�i` s Q�� • J� we 4rV. �t ten( .*i,. .ti (ai1Y��nY3'�nS de de iglu eA,odifi�.�{t��.lja �a L�JI ��1 � �(n 1~fl V1� �S�s ✓ 1 +VF 4[i Ja ld lli t1 tr � Gl- 111, and once tie perched -ter issue 7r es/'�l,;ad� 'aI t. 1r\i TT f.'.6V3 � 4 SO 14 Ul Jam' 1{.rV4 .�1..r V�lll t• •IlV 4...•..di L!+l of Significance. 111anr'r,you ..rx�V;..r a.tt.el.tio.l: :o [1 E} rrttt._�J} a..i:d "iti'1}., 4.Z.1 .w � u s.y,C.e ;.. � q{re-.Jt.:J1:.'t. Very tru; r r CRAMER, V , � !%�' �S0C•.ATES ENVIRONMENT � ��,',�`_ w� 'G CONSULTANTS YOUNG &YOUNG �� PLANNING, ENGINEERING &LAND SURVEYING 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901 Telephone 516-727-2303 Facsimile 516-727-0144 October 28, 1992 Ms. Melissa Spiro, Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES (85-1482) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP at Southold, T/O Southold, New York Dear Melissa: Enclosed herewith are twelve (12) sets of the Preliminary Subdivision Map, last dated October 22 , 1992 , for the above captioned project. After considerable delay, due to the clay and perched water condition, we would now like to get this project back on track. We have recently completed test holes satisfactory to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and based on soil conditions selected a revised site for the recharge area. If you require additional data for your proper review of this preliminary plan, please contact Attorney Donald A. Rettaliata or our office. Very truly yours, nn� Q OCR 2 91992 Howard W. Young PLA@ P il!G EGA D HWY jet Encs. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. +2 sets of prints ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG THOMAS C.WOLPERT KENNETH F.ABRUZZO Professional Engineer Land Surveyor Professional Engineer Land Surveyor &Land Surveyor PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ` ; ��� ,y� SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski,Jr., Chairman t �i;: s Y Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward "'"r �' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road �� �r¢rc%cct� . Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 10, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear, Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town . Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 9, 1991: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, as Lead Agency, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Upon receipt of the preliminary submission, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very trul 'yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. rnIS Chairman <� ''"" '' '� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS � SCOTT L. HARRISv Supervisor Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ® ;af ,�1 George ,..- Ritchie Latham, Jr. n ` 1 Richard G. Ward � ,; Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNINGOWOLD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN Fax (516) 765-1823 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: December 9, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Subdivision Southold, New York SEAR Status: Unlisted Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves the subdivision of a 50.0171 acre parcel into 18 lots with areas of between 30,000 and 36,000 square feet. The proposal involves a.cluster concept which results in the protection of approximately 33.9 acres of open space in the most sensitive areas of the site. SCTM Number: District 1000- Section 055 - Block 06 -Lots 35, 36 District 1000 - Section 056 - Block 01 -Lot 01 Location: The site is located on the west side of Laurel Ave., 140 south of Yennecott Drive, Hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, New York. Page 1 of 2 Major Subdivision-Matthews SEQR Determination Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned "R-80" allowing a yield based on lots of 80,000 square feet or greater. The use involves clustering 18 lots using the 80,000 square foot lot yield, onto lots of 30,000 to 36,000 square feet, allowing for the preservation of approximately 33.9 acres of open space, or 68 percent of the site. The site has been inspected for environmental resources, and it has been determined that the environmentally significant portions of the site are preserved within the open space area of the site, thereby minimizing significant environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Protected site resources include, a wooded swamp, perched pond adjacent upland areas, steep slope areas, and contiguous open space including overgrown field and wooded habitats. 2) The proposed project conforms to the density standards for single family residential development established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, in order to protect groundwater. The project is consistent with groundwater management guidelines as outlined in the 208 Study, SC Sanitary Code Article 6, and considered by the Town.of Southold in review of the project. 3) A Part III Long EAF was utilized to evaluate the significance of impacts associated with impact on land, water, plants and animals, agricultural resources and open space. It was determined that the proposed project is consistent with environmental preservation objectives. Specific information concerning subsoil quality in the area of the recharge basin and on proposed lot will be evaluated through subdivision review. A natural recharge basin will be utilized to avoid excavation of clayey soils and create additional natural areas. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Southold Town Trustees Judith T. Terry,� Town Clerk Page 2 of 2 ES C�,RAIME1�RppI �ii� . _ /r . C:�;I T� ENVIt�©1`i4JI�i`•1T �� r:' �i�3 i-"{a}IYC�.%�.. f'fd� November 12, 199 a Mr. Berinett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Plaz-anin Board' 'own.,14all, 5309 ialair, road. P.O. Box 1179 d Southold, NY 11971 Re: Bayberry Estates NOV ! 3 199t SC'TIVg 1000-55-6-35,36 1000-56.1-1 - Dear Benny: a �+ Pi ;ra� ; 7'' k * Ili 7 ee ! "rs +h {� ��}iY" of, 0h o g grA-�"� P ar4 We are in Ycceipt of your �4t1.i.Gaiz ttic ko� t�' [1 '°lc !id ,.g 4 t T is ��.a �( , I ve. •-aa- T(` .i ,y �7 / ;.� t; F-e i f s•e :�3r' 7t Al�,with rt3,�ii.i"a~. i.6i the €�.L��3.iF avA�'iI � v��L_. +r�C��;t:i, .'.4�� `e i.,.a;�' -=SJ L�'9 C�v::; ;Ss_3 �1,s3--€i�. :'•dx iv'+�, �cl� 4!- is b s. not f�i Si+ !'n`'RF r ' >;.y at this time find that tl-blr`eb is one major concer-ri -:ai ich has not js.�een-a«•quasi ly ad—d-ress- , n n r. c x resources h iel- ty �S' the � � f sout'h ec fie b — ' -his rndttwr concerns ia 'I � S in ll.�,' at•A_il y �_ .�a - -�}It�? 5�s� -etc �Y1 � _� ..s and .ot �9Y! tca1 : ^�irr4t.RE plan. � original x reil �e. a�ak'es�#lCt+�d tl'm following: "Thc wctlarids is.underl'un vvitla C:-nadic rt.•ilt iOputs,wl�,,dj-ot a`s 57�,i S3!Caalt 7316s iarc. -'hk Suil su 'r y iZ.Sb indicates that tiiL;it are 5i vCd' l 7CF:%rtt7ettC.7`it rti C: i?!Sas,,06at{kd%it `,vctIarkdS. Ilztti rMIttc,It streams are:located wilbin the wei?ands5 and in areas bcic"v 21 t'cct t`.nv;zd,-,1 f:l 7.ho western a-ml I ord, f 9 t f 3�i i} x Menti5ed as'not Oros -Coi,wi,,,Iovt 6111 go" :; d`'iincl:a-,sir%J Gfi�t1 ral 3r4:3 the The-so¢. SG��t•3.,arc Inspcction of the arca surrounding dic,:ke,finds oxistinc strata,Grossing;in the 1idn't i tt,' interscction of Laurel li v,';r!e artd:``tair..l;''-oA (5ou:h of t'hc s•7f:b), nd a-ro,`:v�5.313f.:ttt 7 i�% nor k of the site. �li:.1res4ri"C Oa Sii.Y.iI2�&l1ri;Yi e 1�?tG%.6tb�t F3 3FC�i tlF ��d So1s3t:f}a sFiC,�eJ�?�9ti"(I u'atlF tSiY poorly drained soils -nd it termittfint st eams icic'fF6fled in dhe Sol S)Irvcy fi a sips side li ?f,arongly suggests a perched StKcam Oi soi'i'iC: (;tidy cxtcngivc,,t(47.,r lcd asf at;:r£•oakri ion,be i3,nd;.b, li;1ltt',Z'.�i dl,Signated Vvctla ads depictcd oa titc.nnatp. Aaordingly tbi3 Ci ?i$lu t ,c;.n.sjd-'red ir.,he contchi.o;s is use." YThe prescm,,,e of eaten-sive �ie1•C'h-d water epea�.th P.portion E�.i.th.,_ y.,"te (,�art-icul;rly,' the rPCiti�rg+� haSl�� ��nil I,.�."t 171, iJ�rS esC)t been COltu3taCl'C,�. �"irit.R"rea �.t�.4l�'tris finds that the ! regi4n,al groundlWazdr elnv3ttQi'i 1S <ip,L'rt'btiulcaaeir 3 '� fc,01t ae-o e mc,afb Sba level {iii•e). Ty,,. Borings conducted on s'te acid depict,C > orl th4 0—cli4 roar—' ="slt�iJ -�'aSi�J;a !vis m �r,dj!c ,c perc..hed wat�;�'present at an eiev, tiorl of opproxi iatery 5.ti fe(,L above nis 1 , o,th hole . I Based t!p4r?< t��1rS arEu ,�, a1.a3C'•i� stCd.rri is..:t!`va:.g s"?"i.,r1 of sh4`i stt•1= there, i6 l,•o_„+�.ii--�'.•i fan p'vra.lreri water beneath the recharge basin aT,-d Lot 11, vrhi.cb tray be part of this sysitem, consequently, should, rxic1!%tlt3i'. Jcxw _t7:' tli.,, !'oCi7..av baSin and c.i3y � l �t3tta_v sySie :�� t : �f �_t• 11, the-hydrology oaf this s,ytetn, ttcii6ngbh, -Ivefi• -Wi f,o t, ' i r d i Ad` it'jon=l test bCsrli cs could )M corl-idered i th..' ar f.a of the rc,:.! argw bas , and Lot 11 to CytetPz'riiir3� �' 1 ,,Y :1e �.•�lool� of p ,,�r e'dr ,Y o Test ,,, fr1. vv ul y{ likely "si / �.' a flne 1 's ia'.e and ..t/� L.:�i,rl Ci v:va.l i.. tV.t,���:kl die 1.& i�`,i113.�T'.\ ,�.�j II.0�.I alil Id H��t'� H f' .ny" 7 =2i 1 i.7 c' "Jl �'T •tog' r' Iza 7�y. ;t. n-7 t ! 1 F4.? l ",y,�. T 7.7r ;n thereby 1. in,mizit loss ob per Ic. , a � . ��.n a-11cr;a—c to addition.. sv-_i 1_.nr ,.¢s ei be to Ld./n1t".a4-r a mZidx.;..+„d C:+,"stg .t.Jti4 :o ��.1"'✓ snR1ai.A qtab'i.lttrip tiTk •o4"id, sui1sr,.S.e s2?4ec-';, ai. ,diCfy ,ne 4 i 54.2 NORTH 0,01-INTRY ROAD, IMILLEIR PLACE, NY 117$1-41 (5-16) 331-1455 ' �3ossible to use catch basins, and if nccessa provuje can overflolx ro be south end of the G'tepres-,seid`n.. yA b�'ts�i•:y5� c4?�ulld}�1b;,-. provided s.0 }cr,T-att:S,C a closed ct``�tntr,u basin forsetGhn-- r4io to overflo io wetlands. At IF ast two do✓hes o stor ''3��4/ .-.1a�owild'- be pwru : dLY-d, Fur � F. 1- •ya •-p. F a -7C 0 f_ A e•E+ `',-e-4 Sh !l bF i79'� ,- sss mociifirati®r��t��.�ld involve �,d�aci,,g log sizes to .�•�. 0.,� ,; �.ar � ���b a�ao.�'._e -� t`. main ��.c ' f, order to r '.1.�§; ',. �•.,� 4 nt s r � , ate, o 'Lod, a� road (and/or, moving lots to east), `7 � -a � �s�,_�::la to for -={I`v'cai s»..f! <f �.�� a to the area just west of Lot 10. The road tight-of-w� vy for a-Map+' to the a i acent�r npe;t should be provided and,coWd be Tilt if however, ut sboulu b; ors Oss?.d � a private drive via a 280A variance until such time, as the '';spat i� bit-c�s°rs1 d�. Tease review these concerns and call to dis-c01,ss s"a e. 't you are in agreeirkent, the applicant should be contacted and nodfled of the 7c ,1 to Yee ise the 1=2 E- � Part 1111, r ppLovide design modificat�o.i, l�a.`c this tA;ne,we area satisfied ,%vilth other po;Vons of the Paart Iil, and once Che perched water tissue, is resohed, 1 believe we could prvi c.L a Dete-rinin'd-D-ti of Significance. 1 r;s o F G al, c t 3- and ;- e rat 4 you Z..O.v --1 s"1 3� C 'i'llan��o�: "r�.�x Via.+x�r as.c�nt;rJr; co ta.ES TI`ic�t...��P as �. �t:•:�,3»F w�.l ,f Cis �.�.s� �:.j "IL�c�t,t=Ilu. rcry tr"I' y'4 ' ; CRAMER, V , OCIATES ENVIRONMENT �6� � G CONSULTANTS 0 .G PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS �Y Gr. .w^�Y r►7 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ® Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 8, 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Part III Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Messieurs Cramer and Voorhis: Under separate cover the Planning Board referred Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form to your office for review. The Planning Board has received the $500. 00 review fee from the applicant. Please proceed with your review. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very truly yours, Q� Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairmanf LAW OFFICES N1� MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 516 232-1717 WALTER MAC LYN CONLON FAX(ato)232-1747 RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERGER FRANCIS L.BOSCO THEODORE D.SKLAR AMEL R.MASSA November 7, 1991 Planning Board Office Town of Southold 5-00n)Cr2l P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision - Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM #k1000-55-6-35, 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find check of Francis D. O'Malley, MD payable to the Town of Southold in the amount of $500. 00 in payment of the fee of the environmental consultant's review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III relative to the above-referenced proposed subdivision. If you have any further needs at this time please contact me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON Donald A. Rettaliata ms Enclosure � C� 1P � UdC� i NOV - 8 1991 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD LAW OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 516 232-1717 WALTER MACLYN CONLON FAX(516)232-1747 RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERGER FRANCIS L.BOSCO THEODORE D.SKLAR AM EL R.MASSA November 6, 1991 Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision - Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM #k1000-55-6-35, 36 . and 1000-56-1-1 Gentlemen: In furtherance of today's telephone conversation with Mr. Kassner, enclosed please find copy of your correspondence to me dated October 11, 1991. Please be advised that I did not receive this until November 4, 1991, nor did I receive the original of the letter dated August 6, 1991. It is noted that the address on both letters is incorrect. Please change your records to reflect that my current address is as follows: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Telephone 232-1717 Fax 232-1747 I have contacted my client who will be sending me the check in the amount of $500 payable to the Town of Southold for the fee of the environmental consultant's review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON ms Donald A. Rettaliata IJ Enclosures WAS 1991 SOUTHOLD Tr,. PLANNING K: cz PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS CO3 SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O� ® �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 4°i®� Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 11, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: On August 6, 1991, the Planning Board sent you a copy of their Environmental Consultant' s cost estimate for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III, for the above mentioned subdivision. As of this date, the fee has not been submitted. The fee must be paid in full by your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with uis review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski Jr% 'J Chairman enc. NOV j 1991 o, S, SLUANE dL CQNLQM , PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y •.,�.;, ; � SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman d� ,���.•.� eC Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward d�1 �� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kennet• PLANNING BOARD OFFICE h L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 6, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $500.00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III, for the above mentioned subdivision. This fee must be paid- in full be your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. S- Chairman enc. F01 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ' , '5 Supervisor :. � .. George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ' Richard G. Ward s Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L.'Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1.938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 11, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: On August 6, 1991, the Planning Board sent you a copy of their Environmental Consultant' s cost estimate for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III, for the above mentioned subdivision. As of this date, the fee has not been submitted. The fee must be paid in full by your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. S Chairman enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS w = ao SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman r9 V �'� Supervisor q ` . George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward n� -,y� ��v .r Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald 4- ~ P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 6, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue,, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $500 . 00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of the Long Environmental .Assessment Form, Part III, for the above mentioned subdivision. This fee must be paid in full be your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act.. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. S Chairman enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS tic;:: ; '� SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O cry, Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward [ `;'► �' Town Hall. 13095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, Ncw York 11971 ' PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 76S-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOL D ' Fax (516) 7G5-1823 July 26 , 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Part Tix Bayberry Estates West Side of Laurel Avenue Southold SCTM$ 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1--1 Dear Mr. Cramer and Mr. Voorhis : The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form for the .above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Please develop am estimate of what it will coat to undertake the review. Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If''the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff . - 5 Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. _...,......-.._._.__ ._. Chairman enc.- The estimated review fee for this Long E.%" is $500.00, including the preparation of a 17etermznaticn of Sign£ic3nce. please call if you have any questions, and/or advis this office if you wish us to proceed. r Eij �A AN PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS °',' v `l '� ,�. SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ®9 Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward ^� ` d� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 6, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $500. 00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III, for the above mentioned subdivision. This fee must be paid in full be your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State P ,Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr Chairman enc. 1 �,%UFfO�/ �Gy dLls PLANNING BOARD MEM13ERS y SCOTT L. HARRIS u- Supervisor Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. O Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, Ncw York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards % PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765.1823 July 26, 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Part III Bayberry Estates West Side of Laurel Avenue Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Cramer and Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Please develop am estimate of what it will cost to undertake the review. Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff . _ 5 Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. f"T �.��...�.._.-__.._._... _.........._..... .- Chairman enc. The estimated review fee for this Long EAF is $500.00, including the preparation of a Determination of sign£icance. Please call if you have: any questions, and/or advis this office if you wish us to proceed. s v' o��SUFfO(�-co o� G� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y 2 SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Oy Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward 1 ► Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 July 26, 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Part III Bayberry Estates West Side of Laurel Avenue Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Cramer and Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Please develop am estimate of what it will cost to undertake the review. Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very truly yours, AUG _ T 1991 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. mir Chairman enc. The estimated review fee for this .Long EAF is $500:00, including the preparation of a Determination of Signficance. Please call if you have any questions, and/or advis this office if you wish us to proceed. W PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS S Jl SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman •, tl;;.i ;'h �` Supervisor f 3?.; George Ritchie Latham, Jr. .'� � = ,�9, Richard G. Ward F� - � "�' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 July 26, 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Part III Bayberry Estates West Side of Laurel Avenue Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Cramer and Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Please develop am estimate of what it will cost to undertake the review. Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very tr�u�lyy yours, �.�/�'+✓�U �"1 (.� mot, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ! Chairman enc. . Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: EAF Review SCTM4 1000- Dear Mr. Orlowski, Jr. , It is estimated that the cost of reviewing the above-noted application as per your letter of 1990 should not exceed $ No work in excess of that amount will be undertaken by this office unless so authorized by the Planning Board in writing. Please notify this office in writing if you wish us to undertake the review. Very truly yours, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates LAW OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON �S 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 510 232-1717 WALT ER MAC LYN CONLON FAX(516)232-1747 RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERGER FRANCIS L.BOSCO THEODORE D.SKLAR AM EL R.MA55A July 23, 1991 Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates SCTM #1000-55-7-35, 36 1000-56-1-1 Our File No. 12, 667 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find four (4) Long Environmental Assessment Form Part III - Evaluation of Impacts reports as requested in your letter of March 8, 1991, addressed to me. Please submit the enclosed to your consultant for its review. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON Donald A. Rettaliata ms Enclosures JUL 2 4 1991 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �� 0 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1°38 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 8, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Read, New York 119�91 7 9'y RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates SCTM* 1000-55-6-35, 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Board has received their environmental consultant' s review of the above mentioned subdivision. A copy of the report is enclosed. The Board would like you to complete Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. The consultant has suggested that access to Lot 11 be via a private drive, so as to avoid the construction of the cul-de-sac for one house. Although the lot/road configuration may be revised after review of the Part III, you are still required to provide a tap road to the land now or formally of Edwin Mooney. Upon submission of the Long EAF Part III, it will be forwarded to the consultant for a cost estimate for the review. Payment must be submitted by your client before the Planning Board will authorize the review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 55 Chairman Encl. CRAMER, V RH SOCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS �1/Jrj February 15, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 FEB 1 9 1991 Re: Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Benny: As per the your request,we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with our correspondence of October 11, 1990. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings.is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. Overall,we find this parcel to be extremely sensitive due to the presence of an extensive perched wetland system, and significant use of the site by area wildlife. We fully support the use of clustering as a means of reducing potential environmental impacts to these resources. Due to the extreme sensitivity of this parcel,we feel that the Board would benefit through the preparation of a Long EAF Part III narrative discussing the existing environmental setting, the potential impacts of the project, and mitigation either presently reflected in the cluster plan, or additional means which could be employed to reduce environmental impacts. The Long EAF Part III would constitute additional information needed by the decision- making agency in support of the Determination of Significance,which the Planning Board is required to issue. The Long EAF Part III narrative could either be prepared by a consultant retained by the applicant, in which case the information presented should be reviewed by the Board (and/or consultant) for accuracy, or we would be pleased to prepare the narrative. The following is a brief synopsis of the basis for our findings: Environmental Resources The subject parcel is 50.0171 acres in size, and contains an area of freshwater wetlands as designated by the NYSDEC on 6-1-89, and reflected on project maps prepared Page 1 of 4 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Bayberry Estates Long EAF Review by Young & Young. The wetlands location has been reviewed by the Town of Southold Trustees, and is found to be accurate. Accordingly, if activity is located beyond 75 feet from these wetlands, the Trustees have no further jurisdiction. Nevertheless, the Planning Board is obligated to consider impacts upon the integrity and use of these wetlands and associated wildlife resources, as a result of increase in intensity of use in adjacent areas, and other potential impacts. The subject wetlands are identified as Palustrine wetlands, forested in Broad-leaved deciduous plants, and Seasonally Saturated, as indicated in the National Wetlands Inventory. This classification is accurate with the exception of areas dominated by emergent vegetation within areas containing standing water. The wetlands support a significant amount of wildlife activity. The soils map was reviewed for information pertaining to the existence of these wetlands. Young&Young accurately identify the soils on site in the LEAF addendum. The wetlands is underlain with Canadice silt loam,which retains significant moisture. The soil survey also indicates that there are several intermittent streams associated with these : wetlands. Intermittent streams are located within the wetlands and in areas below 20 foot elevation in the western and north central area of the site. These areas are identified as "not crossable without tillage" and "unclassified". Inspection of the area surrounding the site, finds existing stream crossings in the vicinity of the intersection of Laurel Avenue and Main Road (south of the site), and across Yennecott Drive, north of the site. The presence of flowing surface water streams north and south of the site, coupled with the poorly drained soils and intermittent streams identified in the Soil Survey on the site itself, strongly suggests a perched stream or some fairly extensive perched water condition,beyond the limits of designated wetlands depicted on the map. Accordingly this should be considered in the context of site use. The site also contains significant avian species, mammals and herptiles, in conjunction with wetland and overgrown field habitat. Great Blue Heron and raptors were identified in association with the wetland and adjacent areas. Common winter-resident avifauna were identified, as well as activities associated with fox, rabbit and deer. A high concentration of"gun shells" suggests an abundance of game on the site. The topography of the site is irregular; however, few areas contain steep slopes which pose a constraint. One area which should be given consideration is the depression in the southwest corner of the site (south of the isolated wetlands),which has slopes of up to 22 percent. Potential Impacts The yield plan appears to be feasible, and provides a basis for eighteen (18) clustered lots. The "cluster"plan is effective in preserving the entire wetlands and a 100 foot wetlands buffer. Further, there is significant upland open space buffer associated with the "cluster" plan, which we feel is essential. Potential impacts are substantially mitigated under the "cluster"plan through the preservation of 33.9 acres of land, or 68 percent of the site. We believe that the extreme sensitivity of this parcel as identified above warrants this subdivision concept. Given the CRAMER, V R / SOCIATES Page 2 of 4 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS g Bayberry Estates Long EAF Review sensitivity of the site, the obligation of the Planning Board to take a"hard look" at the implications of a decision, and several issues raised above,we feel that the Board would benefit from the preparation of a LEAF Part III narrative. The following is an outline of issues which should be discussed. In addition, recommendations for preparation of documentation and possible design changes and mitigation is also included: IMPACT ON LAND Construction on slopes of 1 S% or greater South recharge area should be strongly considered for a natural recharge basin. The temporary cul-de-sac encroaches on depression which could be used for natural recharge. Natural recharge concept and feasibility should be determined. Consideration could be given to accessing Lot 11 by private drive, in order to avoid constructing additional cul-de-sac for one house. Construction in an area containing intermittent stream and poor soils Perched stream conditions may be present in area of south recharge basin and Lot 11. Sanitary system functioning and hydrologic impacts should be considered. Test holes and/or lot relocation should be considered. IMPACT ON WATER Action requires use of a water source currently experiencing supply limitations Action appears to be within or near the franchise area of the Greenport Water District. Water availability from this source should be determined. Suitability of soils and subsoils for sanitary wastes Soil leachin limitations should be considered in the context of potential ground, surface anMr perched water impacts. Impact to intermittent stream and wetlands Use of southwest corner of site should be considered in the context of impacting natural drainage characteristics. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Site supports raptors, heron, deer and herptiles,potential threatened species and species of special concern Habitats and wildlife should be characterized as support for maximum preservation of open space through clustering. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land Agricultural suitability of site, land use compatibility of agriculture and availability of alternate agricultural land should be considered. IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION Potential reduction of open space Site open space resource and character should be identified as support for maximum preservation of open space through clustering. CRAMER, V R SOCIATES Page 3 of 4 ENVIRONMENT / G CONSULTANTS Bayberry Estates Long EAF Review I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to continue review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very t , Z G� arles I Voorhis enc: Part I/II LEAF CRAMER, V R \' ��' s SOCIATES Page 4 of 4 ENVIRONMENT / � G CONSULTANTS g APPENDIX A ( I' EAF ENVIRMIMEN1AL ASSESSMENT - DART I Project Information MOTICE: This docwnent 4- desicned to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect an the onvIrcnnvnt. Please ccmlete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to Lhasa questions will be considered as part of the aPPlication for approval and may be subject to further verification and public rtview. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to coeoletn PARTS 2 and 3. It is azpetted twat COMIctian of the EAF will be dependent an information currentiy available and r involve new studies• research or investigation. If information requiring not such additional work is uwill will so indicate and: specify each instance. ;LAME OF PROJECT: NAME AM ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different) Francis O'Malley Laurel Avenue, Southold, New York am. ADDRESS AND RAKE OF APPLICANT: tweet, Francis O'Malley c/o Donald Rettaliata p-.rl istazs) (Zip) "" Esq, enstli`ss PHONE: 589-2500 285 West Main Street rvet Sayville, New York 11782 tau p DESCRIPT104 OF PaO,IECT. (Briefly describe type of project or action) _ Realty Subdivision 07= SO- 017 j' It-Ck&-3 / rp /� 607S d&W s'j7-y /n9" v✓11)4 R-90 Zo.WRL5 � SUCO/vvs/o/U 2P I TO IVII7iJ7)-t71V (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate N.A. if not appli 1 ) '°� 6� �� A. SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall project. both deraloned and undeveloped areas) 1. G* rel character of the land: generally uniform slope Generally uneven and roiling or irregular 2. Present land use: Uroan Industrial _ . Coewarcial ,r3yevro7 -. Rural _� foes Agriculture ,-fir V,+,L A7t 'r-: �`�4,Jr�ra,V �'Sb ip- 3. Total acreage of Project area: 50 acres. Aooroximats acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After Comoletion Meadow or Brushland 39 acres 2 7-lacres Hater Surface Area 0 acres tc-':s Forested 3 acres 3 acres Unvagetated (rack. earth or fill) 0 acres 0 _acres Agricultural � acres 0 acres —— —' Roads. buildings OF Tidaldal As new Articles T (Freshwater or and other paved surfaces 0 acres $acres . :a. Z`- or F.C•L,) 8 acres 8 acres — Other (indicate tyme) 2-acres 9. 1 acres Lawn, a. lnat is ^-edominant soil tyve(s) an aro;ect site? Haven Loam __ S• a ^re :ner• �odrocx outcr000inas on nrnirct site? _Yes !x—.3c `--r•_ — r^a: is -,Roth :c 5edroc:? N/A 700 � (, 9;t::_ •------•--• n met) r R. Approximate percentage Of proposed oroject site with slooes• 0-105 _ J�.:: l�-iSS Z; 15: or greeter !. ' 1. Is project contiguo to. or contain a building or site listed on the National Register of Historic Placai? Yes No >!. What is the depth to the water table?20 feet /Z / F-ir A5 /=&--yz yaullv"7 yU et •/Cy 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project areal Yes _X—No Ihao C-7YrD UM 10. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered - Yes X .lo. according to - Identify each species k�4p,70iZ. DES[[=32i� f7�rQl'>'7y�� �'i/t'?Y1�2 i!�.' �1I12 '77,1/Zd�ri�iJx"� f_',fJ{'Z/6`S " O5'P, � ti�i/J/'c./2� l�1=�—.S'�•yS�l!_l f�t1�Sy���I<" 11. Are there any unlque•or unusual land forms on the; project site? (i.e. cliffs. dunes. other geological formations - Yes X No. (Describe ) Ow=- SP&7-147- 12. Is the pro4pct site,presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation CWVC D`A1` 'roe - Yes : No- e1//,06YVC6- ® GX767V:�'111= UgG icy 1-faAi'7&-P-9 rW'LO C*1Lh12C)V 13. Does the pe se views sent site offer or include scenic or vistas known to be important to the connaiity? /tid t:C/L`77�1/s1 S Yes R� NO 14. Stream within or contiguous to project area: -NaP " SN/r4'GL S7'P2C)9-N1 a. Ham of stream and name of river to which it is tributary N/A CCet7Ss� �TT� r�?� 'TD /U a/LT/>el t.1 CS 15. lakes. Ponds. Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: - a• 1 * N/A : b. Size (in acres) N/A 19. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential. R-2) and the scale of developpem+t (e.g. 2 story). /�C7 R-i i JC j't Jl� 'f� i d®�l j/ � /� 1�t 7- 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 50 acres. 5. Project acreage developed: 0 acres initially; 11 .9 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped d. Length of project. in miles: N/A If appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot- age N/A developed acreage N/A f. Number of oft-strert parting spaces existino 0 proposed '. 40 q. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour 2-5 (noon completion of project) /� 7YZ,',)Sf�'�= C ✓�• i'''�. - A. If residential: Numoer and type of housing units: 7� � f 9157). 2ne Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial X a Ultimate X rR i. If: Orientation ':eighoornood-City-Regional Estimated Ertioloyment Commercial Industrial J. Total heignt of tallest nronosea struc_:jre feet. r 2. Flaw much natural material (i.e. rock. earth, etc.) will be removed from the site • 0 Cana 0 ..cubic yards. 3. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs. ground covers) will be removed fro- site - f acres. /re� fr 4. Will any me re forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegeation be removed by this project? X Yes Na & - S. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? _Yes •'•o S. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months. (including demolition). 7.• If multi.-phased project: a. Total number of phases anticipatedN/A No. • b. Anticipated date of cmwencement phase 'Fall month 1 987vear (including demolition) c. Approximate.completion date final phase Fal 1 month)990 rear. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent "as"? Yes 'io N/A . 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes X No 9. Number of jobs generated: during.construction 15 ; after project is complete �. 10. Plumber of jobs eliminated by this project 0 i1. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes L_No. If yes. explain:, • 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid vast* disposal involved? X Yas 40. b. Ifyes. indicate type of waste (sewage.; industrial. etc.) Sewage C. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be. discharged N/A 13. Will surface area of existing lakesX ponds.'streams. bays or other surface watm:ays be increased or decreased by proposal? Yes No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? Yes L—No 13. A. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? _Yes No b. If yes. will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? ' X • Yes No •c. If yes. give name: T/0 Southold : location Cutchogue d. 'dill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes 2_140 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? X Yes 40 Lawns 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? _ Yes Y -No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? _ Yes X No 19. 4111 project result in an increase in energy use? X Yes 40. If yes. indicate types) - c,=zr�C�7tr 20. If water suooly is from wells indicate pumping capacity N/A gals/minute. 21. iotal anticipated water usage per day 6000 qals/day. 22. Zoning: a. What is dominant zoning classification of site? A - Residential/Agriculture � b. Current specific zoning classification of site A - Re identi a] /Agri riiltimp c. ?s proposed use cc-sisten: %.it!i nresent zoning? Yes d. If no. indicate desired zoning 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? _ Yes �_Ko b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? _ Yes X No c. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Approval (Yes. No) (Type) (Date) (Date) City. Town, Village Board Aes QIUS .City. Town, Village Planning Board �T1Q 1 V 1 51 OP City. Torn, Zoning Board NO— Clty, County Health Department sunnTvis Other,local agencies Other regional agencies -•P 9 cof]]I11. • State Agencies Federal Agencies — C. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional informtton as .say be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid th PREPARER'S SIGMATURE: TITLE: L -A,J REPRESEl(TU : DATE: Jr "7L`•` iR! L% 1 s �. YOUNG 0& YOUNG 400 08TRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK zzgor 516-727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX 516-727-0144 Poofeeeional Engineer 4F,Land 8avveyoo HOWARD W.YOUNG Land, surveyor Bayberry Estates Southold Town of Southold (Francis O'Malley) Cluster Subdivision Addendum to Environmental Assessment Form August 1, 1990 Part 1 Item A 8 The elevation of groundwater is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level and since the ground elevations vary from elevation 15 to elevation 31, the depth of groundwater ranges from 12 feet to 27 feet. Perched water exists on the site at elevation 16.5 more or less. Part 1 Item A 4 Although the predominant Soil Type is Haven Loam, a list of all Soil Types are as follows: HaB Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes HaA Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes PmB 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded Ca C 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Canadice silt loam IV- " Part 2—PR0, &-.J IMPACTS AND THEIR MAC UDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and +!terminations been reasonable? The reviewer. is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. , • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response. thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to.a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2).to indicate the potential size of the impact If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. _ d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This .must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mltlpated By IMPACT ON LAND - _ - f-rtipscf Impact Project Change 1 Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO (YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 )<Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet: • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. 0 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. •_Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that -would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ -]Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts C0.VS�zQC7 i,QA-) feu' &V rJl� '� Cd��r ❑ )<Yes ❑No i 9-i«s� r,v �rz Miilr ,all ll� �°©ofZ s�res it 2. Will there be an effect v. _.Py unique or unusual land for s found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes,geological formations, etc.) NO OYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 a a Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage pattems. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO •• Other impacts: ih1,4 M/ '7- ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON. AIR 7-. Will proposed action affect air quality? XNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of.land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑. DYes ONO development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: D ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO . YES Examples that hould apply to column 2 ' • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. 0.'Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat ❑ ❑ DYes ONO • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. 0 Other impacts: -5272m, SuAf I/z�5 RAP-1V-,Z 2, 612!G7g-;. ,ty ice: ❑ VYes ❑No ifiE.=-PIQA j /,�AAM 2LPTii 4 /11 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-three a or CZGL � non-endangered species? NO . OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO YES Examples that would apply to column.2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural . ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) AExamples that would apply to column 2 O OYES • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. O ❑ OYes ' ONo • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ OYes ONo protected stream. 4 Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ OYes ONo • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ OYes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ . Dyes ONo 4. Will proposed action. affect any non-protected exist NO r new body of water? OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of.water ❑ ❑ OYes ONo or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ OYes ONo • :Other impacts: ❑ ❑ OYes ONo S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO YES Exampks that would apply tq column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. O ❑ 0Yes ONo • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ - Ayes ❑No have approval to.serve proposed(project) action. /V U'9% B -'44,ATC- • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo gallons per minute pumping Capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ OYes. ONo supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ OYes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyer;off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ CYes ❑yo do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ OYes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likeh• cau3e siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ []Yes GNo existing body of water Nl the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ OYes ONo products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential.uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ OYes ONo and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may. ❑ ❑ OYes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: 22I7"i����- ��1 `°'r 4�rt` ❑ Xyes ❑No I` 4. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO OYES J. Exx:nples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 7 ' 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑Yes o of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes . ❑No land management systems(e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures(e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: O ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCE 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources DYES (If necessary, use the.Visual EAF Addendum in Sejo ion 6117.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast. to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of D ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: - D ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of C istoric, pre- historic or paleontological importances' NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. e Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: D ❑ byes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO YES ( )The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportun . ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No � r seduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑No • Other impacts: 0 0 ❑No Z a IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation s1(st5' s? Moderate Large Mitigated By ANn0 OYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's source sourcer of fuel or energy supply? ANO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibratiog, as a result of the Proposed Action? O OYES" Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other .impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe y? .19VO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No substances(i.e. oil,pesticides,chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑NO within 2,000 feet of a site used for.the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 10 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existinngxommunityf Impact Impact Project Change J�NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than S%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than S% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the.density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire; etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • 'Other impacts: ❑ O ❑Yes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public contro5;0 related to potential adverse environmental impacts? OYES If Any Action.In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or C . If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of.importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) LAW OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 516 232-1717 WALTER MACLYN CONLON FAX(516)232-1747 RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERG ER FRANCIS L.BOSCO THEODORE D.SKLAR AMEL R.MASSA STEVEN CELAURO February 1, 1991 Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road CAM e P.O. Box 1179 �' ✓�- z��. - Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Melissa Re: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 1000-56-1-1 Our File No. 12, 667 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find check of Francis D. O'Malley, M.D. in the amount of $400. 00 payable to the Town of Southold representing the estimated cost of your environmental consultant to review Part I and Part II of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON Donald A. Rettaliata ms Enclosure cc: Young & Young FEB q l�J9l e ut PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ' Supervisor br! r George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward mw Y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 25, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM#1000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: Enclosed please find a copy of the letter dated January 15, 1991. Please disregard the last sentence. The Planning Board took lead agency only. No determination was made. Consequently, no copy of a Negative Declaration was enclosed. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Encl. cc: Howard Young 1 .% �vFfrOLKc� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rn SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman y� � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. .j' �0 Richard G. Ward01 ! Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1 179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1939 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1991 Howard W. Young Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM41000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Young: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this unlisted action. As requested on October 19, 1990, the Planning Board awaits your client's payment of the cost for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman JN 2 .? i?9 YOUNG I& YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK rigor 516-727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX 516-727-0144 HOWARD W.YOUNG Poofeedonal Engineeo%Land. 8mveyoc Land Su"oc January 21; 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11780 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES at Southold, T/O Southold, New York (85-1482) Dear Don: Enclosed herewith is a copy of a letter from the Town of Southold Planning Board dated January 15, 1991. A copy of the Negative Declaration was not enclosed. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young HWY/0 Encl. Ms. Melissa Spiro 2 41991 FoL,r�oG y� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman v0 f1� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. '' Richard G. Ward �l 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1991 Howard W. Young Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM41000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Young: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this unlisted action. As requested on October 19, 1990, the Planning Board awaits your client' s payment of the cost for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ! �5 Chairman JAN 2 4 1991 S` w ,44 Ur PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman «? ' r Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward `; '���. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1991 Howard W. Young Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM#1000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Young: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this unlisted action. As requested on October 19, 1990, the Planning Board awaits your client' s payment of the cost for review of the . Long Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours,' Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman d n ;} PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS i, + SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ?� •,~5::: �:y 'r, Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 11 '� Richard G. Ward 4 `'"• G. $ '� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 19, 1990 Howard W. Young Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates SCTM4 1000-55-6-35, 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Young: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $,400. 00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of Part I and Part II of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. This fee must be paid in full by your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Very truly yours Bennett Orlowski, Jr. S. Chairman enc. CRAMER, VOOl=1HI.S �,'`-XkOCIAa)US �- ENVIRONMENTAl ;I�: I D N6l1NG CONSULTANTS October 11, 1990 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 5309.?Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Environmental Planning Consulting Services Review of Long Environmental Assessment Form Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 and 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Benny: We are in receipt of your letter of September 25, 1890 requesting a cost estimate for services in connection with review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) for the above project. This letter will provide a basis for completion of these services. We are pleased to be considered for this service. As you are aware we have considerable experience in detern-lining the significance of actions, working with decision- making boards, and providin administrative support including preparation of documents for filing. In addition, we have t e technical training and experience to address a multitude of issues and concerns. Services to be provided are as follows: 1. R view Per I L.1=AF., Field inspect parcel, determine accuracy of information provided and correct/initial as necessary. 2. RUVIr-C Eart R EA—F. Complete Part II LEAP'checklist, and use as a basis for providing further narrative on the importance,magnitude and mitigation associated with a project. 3. dvic z Vnces� Based upon review and preparation of the.LEAF,provide advice to the Planning Board regarding need for additional information(Part lti LEAF,revised plans, agency coordination, etc.), and/or issuance of a Determination of Significance,if sufficient information is provided. We propose to complete these services for a flat fee of$400.00. I hope this provides You with the information which the staff has requested. We would be pleased to discuss this matter with you at any time -please do not hesitate to call. Very tr y , arles J. Voorhig-� cc: Valerie Scopax Melissa Spiro I I 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 I CRArAER, V06RHIS, ,;a '8,SOCIATES. ENVIRONMENTA-AND"" ,' N I`fVG CONSULTANTS October 11, 1990 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Manning Board Town Hall, 53095 Maim .Road P.Q. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Environmental Planning Consulting Services Review of Short Environmental Assessment Form Dear Benny: We have been requested to provide a proposal for review of Short Environmental Assessment Forms (SEAT), for projects which are generally not expected to be as significant as those requiring the preparation of a Long EAF. The Short EAF is a useful tool for review of such actions; however., the form,must be completed in a manner which takes a "Bard look" at the project and provides a "reasoned elaborarion"as a basis for a decision. These guidelines as well as the current Short Environmental Assessment Form itself,were developed by NYSDEC as a result of the H.O.M.E.S, v. New York State Urban Development Corporation decision ,(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department (July 13, 1979). Accordingly the present SEAF provides a basis for meeting these requirements as determined by case law. We are familiar with this form and have completed many reviews using the form as a Determination of Significance and a basis for decision. In completing the form for the Town of Southold in conjunction with recognized actions of minor environmental consequence,we propose to conduct a field inspection of each site, review Page 1 of the form for accuracy and correct as necessary, complete Page 2 of the form including reasoned elaboration of the potential environmental consequences, and advise the Town if the SEAF level of review is adequate, or if the Planning Board would benefit from further information. Under this scope of services, we can complete this level of review for a fiat fee of $250.00 per project. I hope this provides you with the information which the staff has requested. We would be pleased to discuss this matter with you at any time -please do not hesitate to call. Very t ly y rs, arles J. Voorhis i rie Scopaz cc: Va e s .. Melissa Spiro ' F. 00T 1 L t,. 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 y A ��gg �y �gy_ \\�� pp�+s� _ r CAPiMERs C HI \, // S461A 1 GS..... ENVIRONMENTAL lv?,L ._ CONSULTANTS FAX . Tn"-'ANSMy 1,TAL Fax N%Amber (510) 331 -uo46 Date: /0 74S &?.2 To: �"('x/�Sfi- `�,�/12�t� i/f�2GY1/� JCf��'/� � � /11Wx,e From: � _ Xej? S Re Number of Pages (including cover): If the total traltytnitlal i5 not raccived cull nuinhar b►;luw. Comments: �- 1 �c.')-e YoVR cry 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MII;LER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 16,Ff C CRMER, V0. Cl ES ENVIRONMENT L AN6D,' N a��N� CONSULTANTS October 2, 1990 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Environmental Planning Consulting Services Review of Long Environmental Assessment Form Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 and 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Benny: We are in receipt of your letter of September 25 1990 requesting a cost estimate for services in connection with review of Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) for the above project. This letter will provide a basis for completion of these services. We are pleased to be considered for this service, As you are aware we have considerable experience in determining the signficance of actions, working with decision- making boards, and providing administrative support including preparation of documents for filing. Services to be provided are as follows: 1. Reyi w Et * I tXAF: Field inspect parcel, determine accuracy of information provided and correct/initial as necessary. 2, r JI 1,,EAF; Complete Part II LEAF checklist, and use as a basis for providing further narrative on the importance, magnitude and mitigation associated with a project. Ir . - rA I .l AF Prepare Part III LEAF narrative to discuss potential impacts identified in Part 11. We wil analyze the yield map for conformance to code and SCDHS, NYSDEC requirements and provide a summary in the text. Narrative will be brief in discussing importance, magnitude and mitigation associated with a project. Narrative will provide a basis for the Determination of Significance. 4, Dr- Aft Qfi¢nif�'rcance; Based u on Tasks 1 through 3, prepare a recommended Determination of Si inificance Negative Declaration,.Conditioned Negative Declaration, Positive Declaration). This document will be intended to fulfill the SEAR requirements providing reasons for the determination in the appropriate format for a Determination of Significance. Pine 1 of 2 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 r 1 Environmental Planning Services Southold ]Tanning Board We propose to complete these services based upon the following fee schedule: HulkF 1. view W,b LEAF and Tnspcct: 4.0 320.00 2. r r Ear 11 LEAF: 1.0 80,00 3. J!reparc Aj-rj ITT LEAF] 3.5 300.00 4, De c;rmination of SiViriC n—M 1.0 80.OQ Not-to-Exceed 760.00 All fees are based upon a standard hourly rate of$80,00. In order to have the highest quality assurance, principals of the firm will prepare documentation. I Dope this provides you with the information which the staff has requested, We believe it may also be beneficial to establish a contract a&reement between the Town and our firm, with an established rate schedule for LEAF review, Draft EIS review, and Final EIS preparation, as well as other services which you may require. We would be pleased to discuss this matter with you at any time -please do not hesitate to call. Xtrs, orhis cc: Valerie Scopaz Melissa Spiro ti � CRAMER, V XR SOCIATES Page 2of2 G CONSULTANTS ENVIRONMENT PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. A, s Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 September 25, 1990 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, ,Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Bayberry Estates . SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Messrs. Cramer and Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Please develop am estimate of what it will cost to undertake the review. Enclosed also are the Planning Board's previous actions on the application. Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very truly yours,,, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman s enc. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: EAF Review SCTM# 1000- Dear Mr. Orlowski, Jr. , It is estimated that the cost of reviewing the above-noted application as per your letter of 1990 should not exceed $ No work in excess of that amount will be undertaken by this office unless so authorized by the Planning Board in writing. Please notify this office in writing if you wish us to undertake the review. Very truly yours, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates J New York Stars Department of Eiivironmai-,tai Conservation �ap L Wr Re: LEAD AGENCY COOiZ(NATION RESPONSE err f 0e s Dear n'►s . S`1;r'q This letter responds to your communication of AuJOS4' dy) 00 regarding leas: agency coordination for the above-noted project, under Article 8 (State Er.;rror.•mertal Quality Review - SE+QR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Department has the following interest in this project: DEC Permits (if any) : - DEC Contact Person: OA L)`'O S• '') o r':C i I SEAR Classification: [ ] Type I P<1 Unlisted DEC Position.: Based on the information provided: DEC has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status for this action . ' J DEC needs add' ' i f^ `) L J �tio nal .i orzm tlor. in order to resp0,-.-,d �. �c comments) . . [ ] DEC cannot be lead agency because it has no jurisdiction _in this action. Cc-,mments: ( ] see attached ( ] none If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact this office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under Pa--'L 617. Please feel free to contact this office for further information or discussion. Sincerely, Iq cc: (attach distribution list) .r TO: FILE FROM: Melissa Spiro, Planning Staff RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 56-1-1 DATE: August 16, 1990 Received telephone call from Jill Thorp, secretary for the Board of Trustees, indicating that the Trustees had no objection to the Planning Board taking Lead Agency. In addition, Jill mentioned that the Trustees had previously submitted a report to the Planning Board on the above mentioned subdivision. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road ' ^ ` SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 Supervisor Southold, New York'..''+ '. �. Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 Telephone(516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD A o OS 1 �� 1 1990 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and . 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your. jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and- 3 . Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: _ 11 �tcAP S • SC 117D0-55 - h - 35 r 36, u ncl f iroU -56 I - I Requested Action: / 1.7 �Yr to 0/11 50 0171 �tCre rE SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( X ) Unlisted t Contact Person: [ 12 i55,4 Sa 120 ( 516) -765-1938 i LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM U : PART III - EVALUATION OF IMPACTS GROUP-,- BAYBERRY ESTATES SUBDIVISION SCTM #1000-55-6-35, 36 AND 56-1-1 LAUREL AVENUE SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK NEW YORK i i LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM PART III - EVALUATION OF IMPACT BAYBERRY ESTATES SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN PROPOSED ACTION: Residential Cluster Subdivision PROJECT LOCATION: Laurel Avenue SCTM 1000-55-6-35, 36 and 56-1-1 Southold, New York APPLICANT: Dr. Francis O'Malley c/o Mars Sloan & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Mr. Donald Rettaliata, Attorney FILING AGENCY: Planning Board Office Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PREPARER AND CONTACT: Maguire Group Architects/Engineers/Planners P.C. 3237 Route 112 Suite 7A Medford, NY 11763 (516) 696-6007 Jeffrey L. Seeman, REM, REA 010a1uouerrny1,�� i JEFFREY L. c. SEEMAN =tL" REM z ��. 2565 a ����'��i''" n»0'000001�e TABLE OF CONTENTS TOPIC SECTION INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 0 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. 0 IMPACT ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 0 * Land Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 .1 * Water Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 2 * Vegetation' & Wildlife Resources . . . . . . . . . 3. 3 * Agriculture Land Resources . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 4 * Open Space & Recreation Resources . . . . . . . . 3 . 5 GENERAL ASSESSMENTS & CONCLUSIONS STATEMENT . . . . . . . 4. 0. PHOTOGRAPHS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0 BAYBERRY ESTATES SKETCH PLAN, OCTOBER 1989 . . . . . . . 6.0 APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. 0 1 . Environmental Assessment Form Dated May 1987 2 . Test Hole Data/Sketch Plan Dated June 13 , 1989 3 . Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Report of February 19, 1991 LIST OF REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. 0 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION The proposed action involves Suffolk County Tax Map number (SCTM* ) 1000-55-35-36 and 56-1-1 under application to subdivide 50 . 0171 acres to provide an 18 lot clustered subdivision along the west side of Laurel Avenue, Town of Southold, New York. The subject site is located approximately 700 linear feet north of Main Road (NYS Rt. 25 ) and 150 linear feet south of Yennecott Drive; for site development a ± 1600 linear foot access roadway is proposed with connection to Laurel Avenue. In accordance with New York State Quality Review part 617 (SEQR) a Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) Part I was filed together with the proposed Bayberry Estates Subdivision Map (Young & Young) in May 1987. Subsequent revisions to the map have resulted in the current layout - "Cluster" Subdivision Sketch Plan prepared for Bayberry Estates at Southold, October 23 , 1989 (Young & Young) . An addendum to the LEAF was filed in August 1990, at the request of the Planning Board, Town of Southold. Southold' s environmental consultants, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates (CVA) reviewed the application and filed a report with the Town in February 1991. The CVA report recommended the Planning Board request a completed LEAF Part III - Evaluation of Impact Narrative to further assess significance of impact. Resources of concern include: 1. Impact on Land * Construction on slopes of 150 or greater. * Construction in an area containing intermittent streams and poor soils. 2. Impact on Water * Action requires use of a municipal water supply that has not approved availability. * Suitability of soils and subsoils for sanitary disposal. * Impact to wetlands; natural drainage and hydrology. 3 . Impact on Plants and Animals * Site supports wildlife habitats for raptors, heron, deer, and herptiles of species of special concern and potential threatened species status as identified by New York State and/or Federal lists. 4. Impact on Agricultural Land Resources * Proposed action would irreversibly convert more than ten acres of agricultural land. 5 . Impact on Open Space * Potential reduction of open space. 1 The Maguire Group was engaged by the applicant to prepare the LEAF Part III narrative. The assessments and impact analyses presented in this document are based on current and previously accepted reports and data, Maguire' s. field observations and our professional interpretation of this scientific and engineering information. Where applicable, the narrative proposes mitigation plans to reduce impact significance. The minor revisions to the subdivision sketch resulting from mitigation are not included with this report. This information will be submitted upon request, in response to the Town' s comments and findings to the Part III . Additionally, to enhance brevity, reproduction of standard technical documents used in preparation of this report has been excluded. A complete list of references is included at the end of this report. (Refer to Section 8 .0 List of References or contact Maguire Group directly) . 2 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The Applicant proposes to subdivide a 50 . 0171 acre parcel into an 18 lot, clustered residential subdivision known as "Bayberry Estates" . The property is an irregular shaped piece, located ±700 feet north of New York State Route 25 with approximately 1,760 feet of frontage along the west side of Laurel Avenue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The proposed Subdivision Sketch Plan prepared by Young & Young dated October 23 , 1989 provides for 15 lots ( lot# ' s 3-10, 12-18)- designed around two cul de sacs placed (as spurs) north and south off the east - west 1,600 LF access road. A third cul de sac provides for access to a single lot (lot# 11) and dead ends the road at the western boundary. The two additional lots, numbers 1 and 2 are located in .the north-east corner of the site with direct access from Laurel Avenue. The Long Island Rail Road tracks border the site to the south. To the north, are residential homes and a park; Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) power lines and towers transect (northeast to southwest) the site in the northerly area, extending to the property edge. To the west is "High Point Meadows" and to the east, "Long Pond Estates" , residential subdivisions currently under construction. Zoning use district for the site is designated 11R-8011 , residential low density "A" ; the action conforms with current land use ordinances. The site contains a New York State Freshwater Wetland; flagged by the State on June 1, 1989. The wetlands area appears on the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Preliminary Freshwater Wetland Map dated May 31, 1991. The wetland area is also shown, together with the State required 100 foot buffer zone, on the October 23 , 1989 Subdivision Sketch for Bayberry Estates. All proposed lots and structures remain outside the wetlands buffer zone. The applicant has proposed a 33 .9 ± acre open space area, the majority of which includes the wetlands and a contiguous upland zone. This area also provides a deep buffer to the existing residential lots along the north boundary, and along the west boundary. Actual development is clustered within a zone approximately 300 feet north of the existing railroad tracks and 600 feet west from Laurel Avenue. 3 3.0 IMPACT ANALYSES 3.0 IMPACT ANALYSES 3.1 Land Resources Construction on Slope of 15% or Greater This action requires minor areas of construction on slopes greater than 15%: The impact results from the combined affects of the natural topography ( >15% slope) and the proposed use of the area for a stormwater recharge basin, roadway and cul de sac. The cul de sac provides access to lot #11. It is suggested, by the CVA analysis, that lot *11 be accessed by a private drive to avoid a need for the cul de sac and reduce fill required for its construction. The total area of construction on slopes greater than 15% is relatively small when compared to the entire parcel ( less than 2% of the total area) . To reduce slope impacts by allowing access to lot #11 via a private drive is reasonable, providing the tap road alignment with the parcel to the west can be achieved. One alternative examined included relocating the recharge basin to an area south of lot 411 (and provide the private drive access) . This would further mitigate impacts to slopes greater . than 15% and avoid disturbing the natural topography. While impact to slopes would be reduced, the redirection of the site' s collected stormwater would reduce the quantity of run-off now entering the natural swale area north of lot #11. Subsequently disturbance to the overall natural drainage pattern and hydrology is expected by this alternative. The area of impact is specific to the impervious road surface area where run-off is controlled by the proposed stormwater collection and storage system. This alternative is expected to adversely impact natural hydrology and could contribute to wetland deterioration. Therefore, it is more. desirable to retain location of the recharge basin as shown on the subdivision map dated October 1989 and utilize the existing topography and natural drainage basin. Only minor impacts are expected. It is also reasonable to predict that construction on slopes greater than 15% can be mitigated by minor design changes. The area of construction along the 15% slope is not very significant. When compared to the site' s area, the impact occurs to less than 2% of the parcel. Therefore, the importance of the impact on land caused by construction on slopes of greater than 15% is of minor to moderate significance. Intermittent Streams/Poor Soils The. proposed action was assessed by CVA to require construction in an area containing intermittent streams and poor soils. 4 The U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of Suffolk County, New York, existing topographic maps and test hole data recorded in June 1989 indicate conditions exist that may support intermittent, perched stream activity; particularly in the area where the recharge basin is proposed. Field visits and observations did not confirm presence or absence of intermittent stream activity. The site' s soil types are classified as: Haven loam of 2%-6% slopes Haven loam of 0%-2% slopes Plymouth gravelly loamy sand of 3%-8% slopes, eroded Plymouth gravelly loamy sand of 8%-15% slopes, eroded Canadice silt loam These soil types have generally acceptable engineering limitations for building except for the Canadice silt loam. According to the Soil Survey, the Canadice silt loam soils are seasonally wet and their slow permeability in the upper horizons provide a less desirable use for drainage structures. However, 5 to 6 feet below the upper soil level the Canadice silt loam has very rapid permeability characteristics. This would provide a suitable soil for stormwater recharge; providing the upper soil level is excavated/or excavated and back filled with clean fill material, suitable for recharge basin design and construction. It is feasible to locate the recharge basin as proposed on the Bayberry Estates sketch plan, providing these soil characteristics and construction considerations are addressed. To reduce disruption to area hydrology, it is suggested that an outlet such as a positive overflow pipe or spillway be provided at the recharge basin. The outlet would outfall to the natural swale area (remaining after basin construction) immediately north of the proposed recharge basin, and supplement the natural hydrology which may currently support the wetland area. This may be particularly important during low rainfall events. The elevation of the outlet should be considered in the final design of the stormwater control plan. An alternative design scheme would provide relocation of the recharge basin to the south of lot #11. Providing the soils are suitable for recharge, an overflow structure would not be suggested. Under this alternative design, the natural swale area which exists north of lot #11 would remain undisturbed. Hydrology may be impacted particularly during periods of low precipitation. However, the impact to hydrology would likely be moderate to minor because the run-off that now enters the natural swale would continue to flow to the swale after development, with exception for the quantity of run-off altered by the proposed roadway and drainage collection system. This would be directed to the new recharge basin south of lot 411. It is our opinion the recharge basin is more suitably located as shown on the Bayberry Estates Sketch Plan dated October 1989 (north of lot #11) . As a mitigation for potential impact to hydrology an overflow outlet to the natural swale area should be provided. 5 Dependent on future test hole results, the existing soil in the recharge basin area may need to be excavated to a depth of 5 to 6 feet and suitable fill placed in the effective area of recharge within the basin bottom and walls. This mitigation may be required whether the recharge basin is placed north or south of lot #11. It is more the result of engineering limitations of the soil conditions and not purely the result of significant impact or proposed mitigation. Therefore if the existing soils are determined not to be Canadice silt loam in either area proposed for the recharge basin, there may no need for additional excavation and fill; and disturbance to hydrology is expected to result in only moderate or minor impacts. 6 3.2 Water Resources Water Supply The action requires drinking water supply from the Greenport Water District. This water purveyor has experienced supply limitation, and the proposed Bayberry Estates subdivision will have an impact on water supply resources. A typical family of four will use approximately 90 gallons per capita per day for drinking, food preparation, washing and sanitary needs. Although water conserving devices ( i.e. low flush water closets, flow restrictors, etc. ) are becoming standard in modern residences, a figure of 360 gallons per day per unit is assumed to be an acceptable water demand level for Bayberry Estates. This computes to an overall site demand of 6,480 gallons per day (say 6, 500 GPD) . The impact to drinking water supply cannot be thoroughly evaluated at this time. The applicant has requested a statement of availability from Greenport Water company. The response from the purveyor, indicates water will be provided for the project at a future date. If water is not available, the project cannot be built; there would be no predictable impact to water resources under a no build scenario. If the purveyor grants water supply, it is anticipated that (because water is available) the impact to water resources would be only of minor to moderate significance. Sanitary Disposal Each residential unit is expected to generate 300 GPD of sanitary discharge. These flows are recommended by design standards suggested by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, (SCDOH) the agency that will review and respond to sanitary plans for the subdivision. No municipal sewer system exists in this area of Southold, and it is desired to 'utilize an individual septic system for each lot. As required for the SCDOH approval of sanitary waste disposal designs, test pits must be excavated and inspected for each septic system. Soil permeability characteristics will be evaluated with respect to leaching capability. If soil types are unsuitable for septic systems design, leaching pool areas can be excavated to an acceptable depth and backfilled with clean sand to provide suitable disposal conditions. Minimum lot areas accepted by SCDOH for septic use is 20 , 000 SF. The Young & Young yield plan is well within these regulations. Lot numbers 9 and 10 and 6 and 7 are contiguous to and at higher elevations (±10 feet) than the wetlands/buffer area. There is concern for potential impact to the surface water, intermittent stream, wetland hydrology from sanitary disposal generated from these four lots. The sanitary flows generated from the entire subdivision is also a concern with regard to groundwater impacts. 7 There is always concern for the pollution impacts to water resources generated from land development, on Long Island, particularly in Eastern Suffolk County. Municipal sanitary sewer systems and treatment facilities can provide some control to sanitary waste disposal, but availability is often limited in areas of Suffolk. Existing treatment facilities are experiencing operational difficulties on the East End, largely due to capacity and design limitations of the plants. In June of 1991, the NYSDEC assessed the success of Denitrification Systems use in Suffolk County. These sanitary disposal systems were designed to remove nitrogen from sanitary wastewaters; and allow the nitrogen depleted wastewater to leach back to groundwater. The method expected a reduction in nitrogen loading of water resources and to restore water to groundwater resources. As of this date, the NYSDEC determined that the Denitrification System is not an acceptable method for sanitary waste disposal in Suffolk County. Subsequently, Bayberry Estates is exclusively limited to individual septic system use for sanitary waste disposal in accordance with Suffolk County Department of Health and NYSDEC requirements. It is upon this criteria that a determination of no other reasonable alternative can be proposed and assessed for sanitary disposal. Therefore only septic system disposal impacts are evaluated. Impact from nitrogen laden wastewater on water resources can be theoretically quantified. Nitrogen loading from septic system disposal can be calculated, and a zone of influence established to determine and assess pollutant loading impact of nitrogen on ground and surface water. For the assessment groundwater monitoring wells, test pits, soils taxonomy and characteristics, hydrologic data (vertical and horizontal flow direction and quantitative data for surface and subsurface water including intermittent stream activity if present etc. ) would need to be established. Additionally, the effect that the disposal method would have on wetland deterioration could require a Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET) analysis and assessment be conducted. The WET method is a wetland qualitative assessment developed by the US Army Corp of Engineers & USEPA requiring extensive, long range field and historic data collection for 144 parameters. The LEAF Part III narrative does not require assessment in the detail described above. Generally this type of environmental assessment is conducted for regional impacts on wetlands and water quality. If conducted for Bayberry Estates, these detailed assessments would be misapplied; examining only a small geographic area and disregarding impacts caused by regional and seasonal influences. This approach was ruled out for the Part III Narrative because of its nonconformance. Generally, nitrogen loadings in densely developed areas are a concern to groundwater impacts. Impacts from the 18 lot clustered development over 50 acres will have lesser significance than projects of higher density. Obviously a net increase in nitrogen loading of water resources is unavoidable. The effect of nitrogen may be lessened by the plant life in the wetland area and buffer zones. Vegetation utilizes 8 nitrogen as a nutrient, collecting the compound through the plant root system. Providing the soils permit adequate leaching of sanitary waste, nitrogen concentrations are expected to be diluted by interaction with natural hydrologic conditions and absorbed by plant life sustained by existing wetland and/or upland conditions. This may reduce impact to a degree which can only be theoretically determined by long range multifaceted field and historic data assessment. Providing the septic systems are adequately maintained and land use limited to acceptable density, water resource deterioration from Bayberry Estates is at this time not quantifiable but expected to be of moderate impact. The SCDOH regulations and review will provide for future and final determination of sanitary disposal methods. It is recommended to review the SCDOH evaluation for a final evaluation of water resource impacts. Impact to Intermittent Stream and Wetlands The use of the southwest corner of the site and impact concerns regarding potential intermittent stream activity and wetland resources has been presented in Sections 3 . 1 and 3 . 2. The importance of the wetlands and uplands for habitats for plants and animals is more extensively evaluated in Section 3 . 3 . 9 3.3 Vegetation and Wildlife Resources It has been reported the site supports raptors, heron, deer and herptiles, potential threatened species and species of special concern. The Town of Southold required that the site' s habitats and wildlife be characterized as support for maximum preservation of open space through clustering. Description of Ecology The site is characterized by wetland and upland environments that provide ecologically significant habitats for a diverse population of wildlife and vegetation. To observe and record habitat conditions, Maguire Group conducted- a field visit and preliminary assessment on June 10, 1991. The wetland area delineated by NYSDEC includes a stillwater pond approximately 60 feet wide and 100 feet in length (with an unknown depth) . The pond' s perimeter is heavily vegetated with .almost no areas of open space along the banks. The transition zone between the wetland and upland area is also densely vegetated with saplings and shrubs. Soil survey maps and an evaluation by CVA (CVA February 15, 1991) suggest the wetland is indicative of intermittent stream activity. However, the lack of a formulative transition zone sustaining a dominance of faculative wetland vegetation and the density of shrub and saplings in the wetland area and pond, suggests the surface water may be resultant of an abandoned man made irrigation pond. Test hole data in the wetland zone shows the presence of hydric soils, and this area may in fact be the zone where the Canadice silt loam soils predominate. It would be sensible from an agricultural viewpoint to locate an irrigation pond in this area because the upper soil level would retain water. This area is too wet to sustain mature trees in the pond and several fallen trees were observed, Red-osier dogwood tree stumps were observed with a ±3" caliper, with new shoots generation. Black gum, Red maple, wild grape and sensitive fern also characterize the swamp and bank area. The vegetation of the upland area is indicative of old field and judging from the wetland and pond vegetation, the site may have been abandoned for agricultural use 25 to 30 years ago. Areas within the wetlands have been disturbed; a 55 gallon drum, abandoned farm equipment and several large deposits of scallop shells were observed. This disturbance is minor and generally the wetland is well protected by vegetation and not easily accessed by man, resulting in a high quality wetland area. 10 These conditions provide for wildlife habitats classified as "Shrub Swamp" . Beyond the swamp, in the poorly defined transition zone and upland area, the habitat is characteristic of "Shrub Sapling/Opening Edge" . These two habitats, while separated by a NYSDEC jurisdictional delineation, are interrelated ecological zones. The swamp provides food and shelter for birds, mammals, vegetation, insects and herptiles which themselves act as food source for upland birds and mammals. Wildlife hunting space includes the shrub sapling/opening edge and the open upland area to the north of. the site, especially important to avian predators. Deer lays were observed in the shrub sapling/opening edge; frogs and turtles visually and audibly identified in the shrub swamp; rabbits, catbirds mourning doves, crow, northern flicker, mocking bird and sparrow also visually and or audibly observed. Upland vegetation included but was not limited to gray birch, weeping willow, eastern red cedar, white birch, Russian olive, red oak, eastern Baccharis (saltbrush) and varieties of golden rod, ferns, Rosa multiflora, grasses and poison ivy. The vegetation in the upland area provides ground cover, avian cover/nesting areas and shelter. The open areas are suitable for raptor feeding on small mammals. The CVA report supports the assessment of wildlife habitat abundance by visual observation of species and presence of spent shells from use of the property by hunters. Evaluation The NYSDEC published list (which includes the Federal list) of potentially threatened species and species of special concern, and the State list of protected plants identify vegetation and wildlife protected by State Conservation law. There is indication that the natural environment of the site can or does provide permanent and/or periodic habitat for several species of protected plants and animals. The area of open space provided in the Bayberry Estates Sketch Plan is warranted and its geographical location with respect to natural wildlife habitat co-existance with. the proposed clustered subdivision is well selected. The wetland area in the west area of the site is as ecologically significant to the habitats in the northerly open space area as is the open uplands importance to the wetlands. The 100 foot wetlands buffer provides both a protection to the designated wetland area and an enhanced transition area that extends the shrub sapling/ opening edge habitat into the habitats defined by upland area. The plan provides preservation of low ground cover, open field, mature trees, wet areas and areas of transition among a mixture of habitats. This permits wildlife movement on the ground and in the air for purposes of nesting, hunting and hiding, unrestricted by manmade features. Generally it is not the pure presence of people that disturbs wildlife habitat but rather man' s physical changes that create problems. Physical change can be minor as with walking through a field and disturbing a rabbit to the more extreme level of a major agricultural development that would remove all natural habitats, vegetation, disturb hydrology, etc. 11 Therefore, to further encourage preservation the clustered development is well placed- within the site, with respect to the more valuable natural resource area. Some disruption to wildlife will occur, habitats will be significantly disturbed in areas of development; this is resource loss and impact which cannot be avoided. As construction takes place, the animals from these habitats will likely seek refuge in the preserved area or relocate to areas off-site. The wildlife that cannot relocate may not survive, however the disruption is limited and may be outweighed by the continuity of the preserved areas; more likely to support habitats for species of protection and concern. The habitats for plant and wildlife preservation may be enhanced by the long range impact of the residential development. There may be protected species that under current conditions are being destroyed by unlawful hunting and trapping practices. If the residents elect to prohibit hunting and trapping of animals and restrict access to the open space zones, sensitive habitats will be protected. This is expected if a natural resource management program is developed and maintained. It is not encouraged to obstruct the open areas with fencing or structures that would restrict-wildlife movement. Enhancing the perimeter with natural landscaping that would screen out unnatural movement and discourage entry by people, but still allow for lateral movement of wildlife between habitats, is permissible. Future placement of an osprey platform may provide additional wildlife refuge. Attention to future development and potential impacts from the area along. the west boundary of Bayberry Estates should be considered. Ideally this parcel should include a zone of open space preservation contiguous to the area proposed by Bayberry Estates. The impact to wildlife and vegetation is considered moderate because of the balance between preservation of the existing more valuable natural resource area and a low density cluster plan; albeit these are forms of mitigation. 12 PARTIAL LISTING OF SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED TO EXIST IN HABITATS - By Common Name ANIMALS: *Great Blue Heron *Eastern Screech Owl *Great Egret *American Goldfinch *Snowy Egret *Mourning Dove *Common Yellow Throat Redwing Blackbird *Swamp Sparrow Crow *Northern Harrier *Brown Headed Cowbird Bull Frog *Northern Flicker Green Frog *Brown Thrasher Wood Frog *Mocking Bird Spotted Salamander Field Sparrow Eastern Newt Eastern Cottontail Two lined Salamander White Tailed Deer Snapping Turtle Eastern Harvest Mouse Painted Turtle *Eastern Box Turtle Eastern Ribbon Snake *Alder Fly Catcher *Red Tailed Hawk Northern Leopard Frog Red Bat ***Osprey *Gray Catbird VEGETATION: Red Oak Poison Ivy Eastern Red Juniper **Golden Rod Red Swamp Maple Chokeberry Black Gum Milkweed Gray Birch Saltbrush **White Birch Russian Olive Crested Wood Fern Weeping Willow Sensitive Fern Rosa Multiflora **Alder Duckweed Sassafras Common Ragweed **Wild Grape Catalpa * Protected wildlife in New York State ** Some species of these plants are protected by New York State *** Threatened species of wildlife 13 l J• 21 13 /z s rya .:-. r ..�/Ot,;. , _ •¢? �.- =ti'^ Shilohy' :: CZ 32 40� • '.•'�� 1 lire.\ �20-1 —�. �i• .r. -. i• ';• " ';t.`•.,' _ �= __ 3 so zr / �:1:• i J-J dds / n i �.= :•�� -.- �. sO-4..; •�.'' Jennings Ft 90 -iu \•o. .\ mid; �\ `'. \.� •.�, , / 5/ •�.,.�.:. 0. ,-�, -PI�NARY FRESi� ATER INETL,AN ''�_'• rJOA ".\�/ T � >..•�`v P--SuelEt To :R . J _. -, �T Lam: • 's0l11Q� ,: 3H• s as f`•:". y`: _4 •the This is a section of A. ' 3 Tentative"Freshwater wetiar�ds �Jlap I S L t- z'�,� �:, s ,• 2 you ntY '. -�� ?' ,-• for l Founder �_s'� '�a�•-_ /� �',. LandingPrepared pursuant to Articl24 of the Environment r l��—/• - Harpers.•. Park �Aeffaffor ,2 W R 6s I S L A N D Cr: 3 ' New York State Ozpartmel Ew�\nt2cztaS- a 2& Southold' 'o { _ ooke� ..: Conservation. - .. , -. .. Bay; /T r62 N Soutnohd .Paradis• % w7 Gd .��^ •3 '• v •"�-.: *- .- Yacht Clu _.7 Point - � • - .7 • A �•' 1 f1`^•\..' ��': :'!•. .a: �:, .%:l�. is' ' � — - � � _ // _, - N.., It 0' \ P.idug p > 4 14 3 . 4 Agricultural Land Resources The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land, into a residential land use. An impact to agricultural land use was a noted concern. The site is assessed to have some agricultural value albeit limited in area by some soil types, wetlands and the natural topography conditions; obstacles in converting the land for agriculture. Evidenced by the old field vegetation, and what may be an old irrigation pond, sections of the site may, in the past, been farmed. Development of the site for residential purpose will have unavoidable long term impact to the use of the site for agriculture. Other sites exist in Southold where agricultural use could be considered. The subdivisions under construction to the west of the site and along the east side of Laurel Avenue create a compatible land use with the proposed action but compete with overall land to remain for farming. Bayberry Estates exacerbates the condition of land use for residential development that historically was planned for farm use. This impact to land use (with focus on agricultural land resources in Southold Township) was assessed by comparing the subdivision impacts to agricultural impacts. The alternative land use for agricultural purposes may have a more significant adverse impact over several environmental concerns: * Disturbance to Natural Hydrologic Conditions - due to regrading and potential to significantly alter natural drainage to attain maximum site yield. * Potential for Surface Water Contamination - Agricultural use could provide a high risk to wetland deterioration if herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers are misapplied or if an accidental spill occurs. * Removal of Natural Vegetation - converting the site would drastically and potentially, irreversibly destroy habitats preserved by the Bayberry cluster plan. Similar preservation of the habitats could result in economic hardships to farming a restricted site by reduction of crop yield and land use. Natural resource availability within Southold Township, would be reduced if sections of the site were not preserved for open space. A productive use of approximately twenty acres of agricultural land resources would adversely impact area wide farmland use. This impact must be weighed by the potential deterioration of the site ' s ecological value in comparing impacts between the cluster residential and agricultural uses. Relative to this comparative analysis, impact significance to agriculture is expected to be moderate to minor. 15 3 . 5 Open Space and Recreation Resources The development of the 18 lot cluster subdivision will potentially reduce open space and recreational resources in Southold. The proposed action provides slightly more than 30 acres of open space area. The cluster unit plan concentrates the area of development and provides essential open space which includes an important wetland - transition zone - upland continuity. As stated in section 3 .3 the natural existing ecology is best supported by this land preservation approach. . The lack of disturbance to this mix of habitats is important to recognize when considering open space and recreation. Even passive recreation (hiking, exercise trails, etc. ) can disrupt sensitive nesting and hunting habits of birds, reptiles and amphibians. The picking or transplant of New York State protected plants is ecologically damaging and unlawful. To reduce the occurrence of ecological degradation even by unintentional practices, the open space areas are not recommended for recreational use. Recreational suitability is also questionable because of the density of vegetation in some areas. Attempts to eradicate nuisance vegetation (i.e. poison ivy) could have more significant impact on other plants and animals. Similarly uncontrolled hunting, fishing and trapping could damage the natural resource value of the open space areas. The subdivision will predictably restrict access to the site by the general public. This results in a net loss of available, public recreational space but a net gain in controlled open space resource management. There is a park along the North border of the site; recreational facilities exist in the immediate area. Therefore, the cluster plan supports open space preservation and impact to open space and area lost for recreation is of moderate to minor significance. 16 4.0 GENERAL ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS STATEMENT 4.0 General Assessment and Conclusions Statement The proposed action impact concerns predominate on the sensitive environmental conditions established by the existing wetland system and its inter-relationship with transition zone and upland ecological natural resource values. While intermittent stream. activity cannot conclusively be verified or denied, the parcel has valuable wet resources including hydrophytic vegetation, aquatic wildlife, water dependent species and hydric soil conditions. These characteristics are equally important to the upland habitats that greatly depend on the wet area for survival. The Bayberry Estates cluster subdivision as presented in the Young & Young Sketch Plan, has produced an extreme and cautious approach to avoid disturbance of the site' s natural resources. Several additional mitigating measures proposed in the Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Bayberry Estates Long EAF Review Report, February 1991 concur with Maguire Group' s specific assessments.. Construction on slopes of 150 or greater can be further mitigated by accessing lot #11 with a private driveway, thus eliminating the cul de sac at the westerly terminus of the access road. Suitability of soils for stormwater recharge can be mitigated by either: 1) Relocation of the recharge basin to the south of lot *11 (although this may adversely impact wetland related hydrology) 2) Locating the recharge basin as proposed, excavating unsuitable soil and backfilling the effective area of recharge with suitable material. To encourage natural hydrology supporting the wetlands, an outlet structure is suggested at the north end of the recharge basin. Suitability of soils for sanitary waste disposal can be mitigated by: 1) Evaluation of test pit information as required by Suffolk County Department of Health prior to sanitary disposal plan approval. 2) Removal of unsuitable soils and replacement with soils acceptable for septic leaching Availability of drinking water supply must be confirmed by the Greenport Water Company. Physically, water supply is readily available from the main running north and south along the west side of Laurel Avenue. If water is not available, there would be no net loss of water resources. Disruption to potential intermittent stream activity and the wetland area has been minimized by clustering and by suggestions regarding drainage and sanitary structures. 17 i Habitats for valuable vegetation and wildlife resources have been carefully preserved by cluster designs. The upland/wetland open space is largely contiguous with total open space comprising about 600 of the site. Agricultural land resource reduced by the residential use development of more than 10 acres of agricultural is an unavoidable impact. It is assessed that if the natural resource of the site' s ecology is preserved, approximately 20 acres remain for farming. The practicality of crop yield for ± 50 acre site is questionable. Potential impacts to the environmentally sensitive areas caused by agricultural pesticides and herbicides, alteration to hydrology and suitability of soils for agriculture may greatly reduce agricultural value, and/or adversely impact significant ecological land value. The Bayberry Estates plan supports open space goals by use of subdivision cluster techniques. Recreational activity of the site will likely be restricted to the immediate homeowners. Providing an acceptable natural resource program is implemented and maintained, unauthorized (hunting, trapping, vegetation removal) activities will be minimized. This could result in an overall protection to sensitive habitats. Additionally, other recreational areas are provided within reasonable distance of the site. In accordance with the review of impact concerns of land use, water, ecology, and existing environmental conditions the Bayberry Estates residential subdivision plan (October 1989) has been evaluated to have moderate to minor impact to these parameters. It is recommended that soil conditions be evaluated and further assessed for suitable stormwater and sanitary disposal practices, as required for Suffolk County Health Department Approval, and a final determination of drinking water availability be confirmed. 18 5.0 PHOTOGRAPHS BAYBERRY ESTATES PHOTO LOG PHOTO NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 Bayberry Estates site looking north along Laurel Avenue 2 Bayberry Estates site looking west from Laurel Avenue 3 Bayberry Estates site looking south along Laurel Avenue 4 Upland area looking northwest 5 Old field - potential hunting zone for avian predators 6 Open space upland area 7 Upland - old field looking north 8 Upland area - note ground cover 9 Upland area - note ground cover 10 LILCO Tower transects northeast to southwest 11 Typical upland plant 12 Wetland looking west 13 Wetland - possibly old irrigation pond, 14 Probable deer lay area 15 Shrub swamp wetland 16 Scallops shells 17 Shrub swamp wetland 18 Typical wetland vegetation 19 Wetland - note uprooted tree 20 Wetlands 21 Wetlands - note abandoned drum 22 Wetland vegetation - food source t -� �k '�. � ... +rl= / -\ ♦ t•'+Y.y f.�.I rt` �`y .,Xa �+''xxss:"i' •Jrl T�gtr�� . 'f � .,'t� ,R1 r � r��f.,y.i� .fir" ♦ ��„7�. .Fr � -"- .+ "Y ... < r © ,� J r»..,,�#'`� '"•L.l #- '�S`f ll,x,'����`+4pp`li^ . �� 40 .w �w ' � `\� t.'-t., •' �2..• r`` .. .. a�_.� �' �° '�, a R s ` '�� - . r fir' , �► r ,';t l.. J r .Y _ f \ ., •�f' , •;..yv�r �� ', ,� y Wit, _ ._ F A � . �- Jv 44 S. •.w' �. . . i ems\ - -`- ua AAAMM • ,y 1`.t''•1 .�' t I�„ � ,.!�,. .► i '*,: -.... � •ilk ...�,= Allbb aw y •r'•� 1 '�,, r�h. � #,•:w�,:.' .� i,• ; r i � 4 � t�c'iV:� '' 4, �, -�'�'� '1 fro t���� ;,C�� +�Sy,, ;,�. !a,'r�am�`^. '�� ' a� I �• � � `` '• +. � � �: .21 , .. �~_.tR�. •.4`4y a �."�°f,""g �•/♦�= ' •*— L.•f � t .�I y_-�'_— �cR :.�t` +� fie.. { •i Y• ��� .,r � .. =w, C i`- 6.0 BAYBERRY ESTATES SKETCH PLAN OCTOBER 1980 XICNHaaV o-L 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM MAY 1987 r � APPE.NDII A CA ENY1RG.:1'.E?nAL ASSESSMENT - vART 1 Prei'ct tnfnr*atton 11OTiCt: This document s• designed t7 assist in determining whether the action Dr�oosed may have a significant effect on t." envlrcnr.Pnt. Please Comoiete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these QuestlOns will be =steared as Dart of the a`ooliCatfon for laorovel and May be subJect to further varifica:ion and oublic review. Provide Any addttiDeial iRformatson you believe will be needed to mom lets PARTS 2 and 3. It Is ervecten that Comolotion of t-ye EAF will be deoendent on information currently available and will not soIndl new studies. research ns lnvesctdatton. If information rwnuirino suCA additional wort is unaraSioJa, . so indteaee and: soeetfy each instance. IJUE OF DDOJE[f: MAME AND ADDRESS OF 01M ER f1f niffo -"ti Francis O'Malley Laurel Avenue. Southold, New York (Name) AOt�IESS AJYD ►tAttE OF APPLICAn. crest; Francis O'Malley c/o Donald Rettaliata . u u, 7-*i �• 1L1�1 285 West Main Street Esq. I1g1t= PHONE: 589-2500 tweet; �--- Sayville, New York 11782 • •J Caul t D1 O£SCtiPTMR OF Pof1,IECT. (Briefly describe type of Project or action) Realty Subdivision Ua= S�. t7�? /' /t-C,,Zc-3 iA1� 4o /h .� '. —,-/ SUM--)/V, 5/Oi(J 0 1L-1 ?O M/17/V 7> /^ (PLEASE MIPLETE EACH gUESTIOM - Indicate N.A. if not aDDli la) C) ii-eiee, CF A. SITE OESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall priject. both develoned and undevelooei areas) 1. G—Oral Character of the land: 6eiiarally uniform slope Weerally uneven and rolling or irrt—ulaw 2. Present land use: Liman �- Industrial Ca iiorcial ,-Saeorot�lC_, Rural Forts Agriculture , 'JLf1er V{C'h/Ir .i i'A-^in,nAlI 3. Total acreage of oroject area: 50 acres. Acoroximat.e acreage: Presently After Camia tion Presently A/tar =:aviation Meador or Brushland 39 acres 27. lacr•es Hatar Surface Aree 0 icrn —0_ac"s Forested 3 acres 3 acres Unvegetated (rock. Agricultural 0 acres 0 Perim earth or fill) 0 acres 0 acres Httland (Fresh r or Roads, buildinos Tidal as new Artie and other Paved 8 or F.C.L.) acres 8 suri>,ces Q_acres Z _+c^es acres Other (indicate tre) 0 icres 9. i i-re: L; a• "hat Is 'Jominanc saki t.me(s) on nroitct site? Haven Loam S• a ='L' :herw o•arott outcro-201nas on �_it^.t hit_? rPi X. Yr !s :Roth :h: �edmc;? N/A -- —1 •l;•s /0O � (in •eel ys R. A:orcximata percentage of prnpoted project site with tldoes: 0.It]". 1n-iit .3 S: Is: or greeter �r G 7. Is Pro)ect contiguo s to, or contain a buildinn or site listed an the National Register of Histzric PIAcesf Yes No a. What is the depth to the water table feet 1Z 710 2-7 F7- its P67Z YCUM6 ; yo v,.Vcy 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project areal yes X No +DD CND UM 10. Does project site Contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endaneered - Yes X :Io. according to - Identify each special �! A'rnrST"c??Yrry1 /ySQE/�yt-� 11. Are there any unique•ar unusual land form on the project site? (Le. Cliffs. dunes. other geological AVO formations - yes X red. (Describe ) Dr— 12. Is the Proec jt site,presently used by the cainnunity or neighbornood as an open Space or recreation CC:���?,-J , one - des No. C-Vi410VVC.C-_ USf ,SY Cr•F/Lb1-Q 13. Dom the present site offer or include scenic viers or vistas knorn to be inxir'tsnt to the comamityl //V II.rL�.+iii�l AU CSq , li. Striam within or contiguous to project Area; "HnRa- SM1+-L Z'i72E7}M f=L2�p j ;A,'Lc7�= a. Meow of strem and naawi of river to rhieh it 11 tributary N/A CRDSS/S S%TS- r,?" ' '7'n iV�2Tlfcc,�EST 15. lakes. Pcnds. ktland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Item N/A ; b. Size (in acres) N/A IS. ti'hat it the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the vroject (e.g. single family residential. R-2) and the scale of deveicommt (e.g. 2 story). 146 P--G,uC %�i A�:rJT/h-L, VAC:AIV7- D. PROJECT DESCRIPTICN 1. Physical diaseniions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 50 acres. b. Project acreage developed: 0 acres initially; 1 1 .9 acres ultimately. e. Project acreage to rtsnain undeveloped -1 8- 1 . d. Length of project. in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e- If proieet is an expansion of existing. indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot- age NIA : deveiaoed acreage N/A . f. hueoer of off-str•net carscing spaces existing 0 proposed : 4 N g. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour 2-5 (upon ccmaletion of project) //;� /PS/l'�74-fe P• /�, r h. If residential: Numoer and type of housinq units: (-` TC/ / 6 7) 2ne Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial X Ultimate X 1. If: Orientation ::elgnoornagd-Clty-aegional Estimated Emoloyment Commercial industrial !. Tc:al heignt ce taiiesc -ronasea st►uc:�sre (eet. 2. How mxn natural notarial (i.a. rock. earth. etc.) will be rer+oved from the site 0 tons epic yards. ]. Now many acres of vabetation (trues. shrubi. ground covers) will be rewaved frv- site - �cres. 4. Hill any eatWv forest (aver IM years old) or other Ices 11y-la4ortant vegetation be renvved s 7 tr++s ' project? A Yes No S. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that remved L??during construction! _Yes .a 6. If single pnase project: Anticipated Period of construction `, months. (inciuding denelition). 7.• If multi-phased project: A. Total nuneer of phases antieipatedN/A No. • b. Anticipated date of cervienctin nt Ouse :Fa l I month i 987vear (Includitg da+eo I i ti on) C. Approximate. completion data final phase Fal I Montnl 990 .,ear, d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsaauenc dnasas! Yes >+o Id/r 8. Will blasting o=r during construction? Yes X. Me 9. Mundmir of jobs generated: during.construction r after project is ccrplete 1n 10. Muerier of lobs eliminated by this Project 0 11. .Hill prnJeet re,3uire relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes Y ►0. If yes. aiDialM 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste dizztpui ievolied7 X Yes b. Ifyrs. Indicate type of rasa (sewage. industrial, a=.) Sewdae C. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged f)/n 13. Will surface area of existing iikesX ponds.. streams. bays or other surface watm:ays be tncrtased or decreased by proposal? Yes 'lo. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood Plain? Yes -1y4u i3. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? _X_Yes No b. If yes. will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? X Yas 40 C. If yes. give name: T/0 Southold : location Cutchoatie d. LIM any wastes not go into a sewage disposal srstes or into a saslury landfill? Yes _tip 16. Hill Dreject use herbicides or pesticides? X Yes no Lawns 17. Hill project routinely produce odors (snore than one hour oer day)? _ Yes Y 40 18. Hill project produce operating noise exceeding the local ampience noise levels? - _Yes _X —.4019. Will project result in an Increase in energy use? X Yes 40. If yes. indicita tM!s)) 20. If rater sucoly is from wells indicate Dump+ng _apactty N/A gals/minute. f' 21. total anttelnaced water usage per day 6000 cals/day, - �0 22. Zoning: a. What is dominant zoning classification of site? A - Residential /Anrl rtll t tirn b. Current sot_iltc zoning classification of site A - RPS1dPn i a l /A.nri ril l 4 . -n e. !s orocose(t use ca-S+Stnn- .It1 rre7ent raninc? Yes d. If no. Indicate desired zonina 41 26. ADOrerals: a. Is any Federal permit reauind? _ Yes �_Ho b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? _ Yas X No c. local and Regional approvals: Avvroval Reauired Submittal Aooroval (Yes. "a) (Type) (Data) (Date) City. Town. Village Board PS Q1115ter .City. Torn. Village Planning Board l 1 V 1 5,1 Oil City. Town. Zoning Board 14 0 City. County Health Oeoartm+ent MI IV I Other local agencies Other regional agencies —P 19 COfjuJl. _ State Agencies — Federal Agencies 'IRS C. INFORMATICRAL DETAILS AttsU any additional inforawtion as-my be needed to clarify your.prcjoct. If tile" are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the Possum which can be taken to ®ttigata or avoid zth"".' PWARER'S SIGUTURE: TITU: L'''trl.J 5 U/L Eyo/L REPRESUTING: Z� %y14�L�z1 5 v/'y/>/✓ }i U-tJ DATE: 1 I ' YOUNG %% YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK tt9or 016-727-2707 ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX u1G-727-0144 Pvcfeswana!Eiujirwo V Land Su�veyx HOWARD W.YOUNG i�„� Susreyor Bayberry Estates Southold Town of Southold (Francis O'Malley) Cluster Subdivision Addendum to Environmental Assessment Form August 1, 1990 Part 1 Item A 8 The elevation of groundwater is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level and since the ground elevations vary from elevation 15 to elevation 31, the depth of groundwater ranges from 12 feet to 27 feet. Perched water exists on the site at elevation 16. 5 more or less. Part 1 Item A 4 Although the predominant Soil Type is Haven Loam, a list of all Soil Types are as follows: HaB Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes HaA Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes PmB 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded PmC 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Ca Canadice silt loam IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impac Moderate Large Mitigated 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Chi (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Consenjon Law, ECL) �10 Examples that would apply to column 2 11111 OYES • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 7— Dredging.more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 7- Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C 4. Will proposed action affect any nomprotected exist i g r new body of water? 10 OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO ES Ezampks that would apply tq column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ Ayes Chave approval to serve proposed(project) action. /VVS7" *3e= • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C gallons per minute pumping Capacity. • Construction or operation cawing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater.. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C • Liquid effluent will be conveyer;off the site to facilities wh:ch presently ❑ ❑ G' r es C do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per Cl ❑ ❑Yes C day. • Proposed Action will lik(-l-• caUsP siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ 0 Yes C existing body of water to the?>:tent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ Dyes C products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: Sn/LS LQ -n — ❑ Xyes C S; f 771,!_' V .S`A5.--Or"S f J. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO OYES Exz.nples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes Small to Potential Can Impact Moderate Large Mitigated 8 Impact Impact Project Chan • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑� • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage pattems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑� • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ,❑ ❑Yes ❑� •• Other impacts. iMr'•1`r- —12 •rrrmlr- �'T'J=NLt,) ❑ ❑Yes ❑� 151��=�7IVY► /-sas",lir,TI713 06,1 ) IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? XNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑t hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑t refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑t heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ [Dyes ❑1 to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑I development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑I IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO YES Examples that hould apply to column 2 ' • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑, list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: P-AP72 s 6'>M ��r �,- ❑ Yes ❑. :;y.�r.i► n�-7:Y� !+,tom !'C,Y''r'i[� ��.(M/"Q-,'AAjS 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-three a or non-endangered species? NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?. i ONO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0- land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 t a a Small to Potential Can Impact E Moderate Large Mitigated Ek) Impact Impact Project Ch" • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N- agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑Yes of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N. land management systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures(e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCE 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? O ❑YES (If necessary. use the Visual EAF Addendum in Sec ion 617.21, Appendix 6.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ Oyes ON aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of Pistoric, pre- historic or paleontological importance? NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? _ Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO YES ( )The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportun . ❑ ❑ Yes ON PO r 77.tti � er reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ gYes ON • Other impacts: 0 13 Yes ON 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Imps 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systt I Moderate Large Mltlgat& emsENO OYES Impact Impact Project aExamples that would apply to column 2 , ` • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes l • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ [--)Yes i • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's so rc of fuel or energy supply? AN OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibraq*cq, as a result of the Proposed Action? \O DYES' r . Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,5W feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local 0 _ ❑ ❑Yes ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe V? 19NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes substances(i.e.oil,pesticides.chemicals. radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ Dyes form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 0Yes 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated I is. Will proposed action affect the character of the exis7NA i O DYESommunityt Impact impact Project Chai Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑. project is located is likely to grow by more than S%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑• will increase by more than S% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑. • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ El Yes G • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C' 19. Is there, or is there likely to be. public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? 10 OYES If Any Action In Part 2 IS Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) Is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) m mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project cha 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 2. TEST HOLE DATA/SKETCH PLAN JUNE 13, 1989 3. CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES REPORT FEBRUARY 19, 1991 1 ` t PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman Supervisor Georee Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward �� „y Town Hall. 531095 Main Roa 'dark S. :�1cDonald �� P.O. Box 1 179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. Ne%% Yllrk 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1939 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I:ax (516) '65-I823 March 8 , 1991 nN—.141 M---- r—TI) Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street APR P .O. Box 493 River-head, New York 11901 MARS, SLOANE 8 CCNLON RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates SCTM* 1000-55-6-35 , 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Board has received their environmental consultant ' s review of the above mentioned subdivision. A copy of the repor,:: is enclosed. The Board would like you to complete Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. The consultant has suggested that access to Lot 11 be via a private drive, so as to avoid the construction of the cul-de-sac for one house. Although the lot/road configuration may be revised after review of the Part III , you are still required to provide a tap road to the land now or formally of Edwin Mooney. Upon submission of the Long EAF Part III , it will be forwarded to the consultant for a cost estimate for the review. Payment must be submitted by your client before the Planning Board will authorize the review. Please. contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours , , Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS February 15, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Bayberry Estates SCI'M# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Benny As per the your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with our correspondence of October 11, 1990. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part 1 LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF. The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. Overall, we find this parcel to be extremely sensitive clue to the presence of an extensive perched wetland system,.and significant use of the site by area wildlife. We fully support the use of clustering as a means of reducing potential environmental impacts to these resources. Due to the extreme sensitv..�ity of this parcel, we feel that the Board would benefit through the preparation of a L:)ng EAF Part III narrative discussing the existing environmental setting, the potential impacts of the project, and mitigation either presently reflected in the cluster plan, or additional means which could be employed to reduce environmental impacts. The Lon& EAF Part 11I would constitute additional information needed by the decision- making agency in support of the Determination of Significance, which the I'lannim-, Board is required to issue. The Long EAF Part III narrative could either be prepared by a consultant retained by the applicant, in which case the information presented should,be reviewed by the Board (and/or consultant) for accuracy, or we would be pleased to prepare the narrative. The following is a brief synopsis of the basis for our findings: Environmental Resources The subject parcel is 50.0171 acres in size, and contains an area of freshwater wetlands as designated by the NYSDEC on 6-1-89, and reflected on project males prepared Page 1 of 4 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER ?LACE, NY 11764 (.516) 331.1455 Bayberry Estates Long EAF Review by Young & Young. The wetlands location has been reviewed by the Town of Southold Trustees, and is found to be accurate. Accordingly, if activity is located beyond 75 feet from these wetlands, the Trustees have no further jurisdiction. Nevertheless, the Planning Board is obligated to consider impacts upon the integrity and use of these wetlands and associated wildlife resources, as a result of increase in intensity of use in adjacent areas, and other potential impacts. The subject wetlands are identified as Palustrine wetlands, forested in Broad-leaved deciduous plants, and Seasonally Saturated, as indicated'in the National Wetlands Inventory. This classification is accurate with the exception of areas dominated by emergent vegetation within areas containing standing water. The wetlands support a significant amount of wildlife activity. The soils map was reviewed for information pertaining to the existence of these wetlands. Young & Young accurately identify the soils on site in the LEAF addendum. The wetlands is underlain with Canadice silt loam, which retains significant moisture. The soil survey also indicates that there are several intermittent streams associated with these wetlands. Intermittent streams are located within the wetlands and in areas below 20 foot elevation in the western and north central area of the site. These areas are identified as "not crossable without tillage" and "unclassified". Inspection of the area surrounding the site, finds existing stream crossings in the vicinity of the intersection of Laurel Avenue and Main Road (south of the site), and across Yennecott Drive, north of the site. The presence of flowing surface water streams north and south of the site, coupled with the poorly drained soils and intermittent streams identified in the Soil Survey on the site itself, strongly suggests a perched stream or some fairly extensive perched water condition, beyond the limits of designated wetlands depicted on the map. Accordingly this should be considered in the context of site use. The site also contains significant avian species, mammals and herptiles, in conjunction with wetland and overgrown field habitat. Great Blue 1-feron and raptors were identified in association with the wetland and adjacent areas. Common winter-resident avifauna were identified, as well as activities associated with fox, rabbit and deer. A high concentration of"gun shells" suggests an abundance of game on the site. The topography of the site is irregular; however, few areas contain steep slopes which pose a constraint. One area which should be given consideration is the depression in the southwest corner of the site (south of the isolated wetlands), which has slopes of up.to 22 percent. Potential Impacts The yield plan appears to be feasible, and provides a basis for eighteen (18) clustered lots. The "cluster" plan is effective in preserving the entire wetlands and a 100 foot wetlands buffer. Further, there is significant upland open space buffer associated with the "cluster" plan, which we feel is essential. Potential impacts are substantially mitigated under the "cluster" plan through the preservation of 33.9 acres of land, or 68 percent of the site. We believe that the extreme sensitivity of this parcel as identified above warrants this subdivision concept'. Given the CRAMER, VOORHIS &.ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAI:,,AND•P.LANNJ1 G CONSULTANTS Page 2 or 4 Bayberry Estates Long EAF Review sensitivity of the site, the obligation of the Planning Board to take a "hard look" at the implications of a decision, and several issues raised above, we feel that the Board would benefit from the preparation of a LEAF Part III narrative. The following is an outline of issues which should be discussed. In addition, recommendations for preparation of documentation and possible design changes and mitigation is also included: IMPACT ON LAND Construction on slopes of 15% or greater South recharge area should be strongly considered for a natural recharge basin. The temporary cul-de-sac encroaches on depression which could be used for natural recharge. Natural recharge concept and feasibility should be determined. Consideration could be given to accessing Lot 11 by private drive, in order to avoid constructing additional cul-de-sac for one house. Construction in an area containing intermittent stream and poor soils Perched stream conditions may be present in area of south recharge basin and Lot 11. Sanitary system functioning and hydrologic impacts should be considered. Test hales and/or lot relocation should be considered. IMPACT ON WATER Action requires use of a water source currently experiencing supply limitations Action appears to be within or near the franchise area of the Greenport Water District. Water availability from this source should be determined. Suitability of soils and subsoils for sanitary wastes Soil leachin limitations should be considered in the context of potential ground, surface anXIr perched water impacts. Impact to intermittent stream and wetlands Use of southwest corner of site should be considered in the context of impacting natural drainage characteristics. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Site supports raptors, heron, deer and herptiles,potential threatened species and species of special concern Habitats and wildlife should be characterized as support for maximum preservation of open space through clustering. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land Agricultural suitability of site, land use compatibility of agriculture and availability of alternate agricultural land should be considered. IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION Potential reduction of open space Site open space resource and character should be identified as support for maximum preservation of open space through clustering. 1 CRAMER. VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAt:,AND. PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page or Bayberry Estates Lung EAF review I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to continue review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very t/ y G�:aarles J. Voorhis enc: Part I/II LEAF CRAMER, VOORHIS. & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL',AND::PLANNJ,��IG CONSULTANTS Page 4 of 4 u;rir �c 8.0 LIST OF REFERENCES .8.0 LIST OF REFERENCES Wetlands, Audubon Society, by William A. Niering, Pub. Alfred A. Knopf Inc. , Chanticleer Press Inc. NY, September 1989 Field Guide to North American Wildflower, Audubon Society, by Niering & Olmstead, Pub. Alfred A. Knopf Inc. NY, Chanticleer Press Inc. NY, January 1988 Field Guide to North American Trees, Eastern Region, Audubon Society, by Little, E.L. , Pub. Alfred A. Knopf Inc. NY, Chanticleer Press, NY, October 1988 Soil Survey of Suffolk County, NY, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington DC, 1970 Munsell Soil Color Charts, Kollmorgen Instruments Corp. , Kollmorgen Inc. , Baltimore, MD, 1990 Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetland, by Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, (USACOE, USEPA, USF&W, USDA Soil Conservation Service) Washington DC, 1989 National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northeast Region, by P.B. Reed, gr. US Fish & Wildlife Service, 1988 List of Protected Plants - NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY List of Protected Wildlife Species, NYSDEC Albany, NY Preliminary Freshwater Wetland Map, NYSDEC Region I, Stony Brook, NY The Field Guide to Wildlife Habitats of Eastern United States, by Janine Benyus Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering, by Cook, Magraw Hill, 1990 Standards for Sewage Disposal Systems, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Riverhead, NY, 1984 ' I The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments .below) . Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. �S Chairman cc: Beard efge�}� Board of Trustees Bu-i-ld-i��3efaa-�t�nent . Southold Town Board Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services .;,K NYSDEC - Stony Brook SC.Dept.of Public we-i-1,E7s �c U.S.Army-4o=p-of—Engineers N-:Y—S-.w—Dept—of—T-r-ansportation * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies = ; YOUNG v� YOUNG ::SU c�c C E 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE M-"S RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK ::gor 516-727-2303 aALDEN W.YOUNG FAX 516-727-0144 HOWzARD W.YOUNG Poofeeeional Engineao W Land Suaveyoc Land &—for August 1, 1990 Town of Southold Planning Board Southold, New York 11971. Att: Ms. Melissa Spiro Re: Bayberry Estates (Francis O'Malley) Southold, Town of Southold Dear Melissa: Pursuant to your inquiry, we have reviewed the depth of groundwater and the soil types at the above captioned site. We find no major discrepancies or errors in the Environmental Assessment Form but have prepared and are enclosing herewith an Addendum to the Environmental Assessment Form. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young H�yY u Encl. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. YOUNG YOUNG 400 OSTRaANDER AVENUE RIVERHt AD, ]NEW YORK rt9or 516-727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX o 16-727-014t Pcofeeeional Engineer V Land. Surveyor HOWARD W.YOUNG Land Surveyor Bayberry Estates Southold Town of Southold (Francis O'Malley) Cluster Subdivision Addendum to Environmental Assessment Form August 1, 1990 Part 1 Item A 8 .The elevation of groundwater is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level and since the ground elevations vary from elevation 15 to elevation 31, the depth of groundwater ranges from 12 feet to 27 feet. Perched water exists on the site at elevation 16. 5 more or less. Part 1 Item A 4 Although the predominant Soil Type is Haven Loam, a list of all Soil Types are as follows: HaB Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes HaA Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes PmB 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded Ca C 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Canadice silt loam rEt - F APPENDIX A EAF ENYIRMPIEN1AL ASSSSSNENTGD Project information MOTICE: This document desrened to assist in determining whether the action proposed nay have a significant effect an the on v I rcnr%en t. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the +pplication for approval and may be subject to further verifica:ion and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete PARTS 2 and 3. It is •:petted that cpmolotipn of the EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies• research or investioation. If information requiring such additional rorK is unava$eDle. so indicate and. specify each instance. .UME OF PROJECT: MAME AM ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different) Francis O'Malley Laurel Avenue, Southold, New York a� ADDRESS AND NATTE OF APPLICANT: _ (Street) Francis O'Malley c/o Donald RettaliataA-n coca 1�,p1 M Esq, 285 West 'Ma i n Street �K PtioNE: 589-2500 rest Sayville, New York 11782 Tru-7 is to to p OESCRIDTiOI OF PQOJECT' (Briefly describe type of project or action) Realty Subdivision (PLEASE CO11PLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate N.A. if not applicable) A. SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall project. both d@"Ion" and undevelooed areas) 1. Gerral character of the land: generally unifo►s slope Generally uneven and rollir4 or irre7ular 2. Present land use: Urban Industrial -_ , Conwercial . Suburban X _, Rural Forest Agriculture ,fir - 3. Total acreage of oroject area: 50 acrn. Aooroximata acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After Completion Meadow or 8mshland 39 acres 27-lacres Hater Surface Area 0 acres _0 _ac-•es Forested 3 acres 3 acres Unvegetated (rock. earth or fill) 0 acres 0 '_acres Agricultural 0 acres 0 acres —— Roads, buildings Netland (Freshwater or and other paved Tidal as ner Articles surfaces 0_acres 2.$acres 24. :`- or F.C.L.) 8 acres 8 acres Other (indicate ty^e) 0 acres 9. 1 acres Lawn' a. ghat iS ^-•dominant soli types) on nraiect site? Haven_Loam 5• a 're :hero nodro:R outcro7oinas on rnirct sit^? ----Yes ---^_Yc _--Y•— — ^a: is :eotn to tedroc:? N/A ) R. Approximate percentace of pr000sed oroject site with slaoes• 0-10, 1 0 07* 1f1-15f t: 15: or greater — - . ?. Is Project contiguoy; to. or contain a building or site listed an the National Register of Historic Places? _ _Yes x No 8. What is the depth to the water cable?2 0—30 feet 9. Oo hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes ._2.—NO 10- DOGS project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered - Yes X .lo. according to - Identify each species 11. Are there any unique•or unusual land forms an the project site? (i.e. Cliffs. dunes. other geological formations - Yes X Na. (Describe ) 12. Is the project site presently used by the ca. nity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area - Yes X No. 13. Does the prysent Site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be Important to the coeeamity? Yes �l No 14. Stream within or contiguous to Project area: None a. Xnma of stream and name of river to which it is tributary N/A 13. Was. Ponds. Hetland areas within or contiguous to project ana: - a. clone N/A b: Size (in acres) N/A 19. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential. R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION , 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 50 acres. b. Project acreage developed: 0 acres initially: 11 -9 acres ultimately. �C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped IRA d. Length of project. in miles: N/A if appropriate) s. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot- age N/A developed acreage N/A f. Nuetier of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed = 40 q. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour 2-5 (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: one Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial X Ultimate X I. If; Orientation ::eighbornood-City-Regional Estimated Employment Commercial Industrial J. Tetal heignt of tallest nronasee struc:ire feet. • f 2. How much natural material (i.e. rack, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site • 0 tons •• 0 ..cubic yards. 3. )for many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs. ground covers) will be removed fro■ site - 2$acres. 4. Vill any matyre forest (over 100 years aid) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by tn*s project? x Yes No S. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? L_Yes 'w 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months. (including demolition). 7.• If multi-phased project: a. Total number of phases anticipat"N/A No. • b. Anticioated date of conmencew"t phase !Fal 1 month 1987vear (including demolition) c. Approximate.completion date final phase Fa l -monthl 990 rear. d. IS phase 1 financially dependent on subseouent ?rusts? . Yes pro N/A 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes X He 9. Humber of jobs generated: during.construction after project is correlate 10. Nunber of jabs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project re4uire relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes _X—No. If yes. explain: 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? X Yes 40. R b. Ifyes. indicate type of waste (sewage.; industrial. etc.) Sewage c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will bt discharged N/A 13. Will surface area of existing lake pands.'stream. bays or other surface waten:ays be Increased or decreased by proposal? Yes No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? Yes -L—Na 19. a. Does project Involve disposal of solid waste? _Yes No b. If yes. will an existing solid waste dlinosal facility be used? X • Yes !id •c. If yes. give name: T/0 Southold : location Cutchogue d. Vi ll any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes he 16. will project use herbicides or pesticides? X Yes 'to Lawns 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? _ its Y No 18. W111 project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? _ Yes X _yo 19. 41ll project result in an increase in energy use? X Yes 40. If yes. indicate types) 20. If water supply is from yells indicate pumping capacity N/A gals/minute. 21. Total anticinated water usage per day 6000 gals/day. 22. Zoning: a. What is dominant zoning classification of site? A - Residential/Agricultua b. Current specific zoning classification of site A - Re ident iaaI /A9rirrrltrmp c. !s or000sed use cc-sistent win present zoning? Y e s d. If no, indicate desired zonino _N/A_•__ __ __•_•_•__=_ 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? _ Yes �_kO b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? _ Yes X No c. Local and Regional approvals: . Approval Required Submittal Approval (Yes. No) (Type) (Date) (Date) City. Town. Village Board Yes 1 .City. Torn. Village Planning Board 1 V 1 S�1 City. Torn. Zoning Board O— City. County Health Department Other-local agencies Other regional agencies Mann7rg COfjjpl. State Agencies Federal Agencies — C. INFORMATIDMAL DETAILS Attach any additional infornetlon as-.way be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal. please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid th PREPAREA'S SIGNATURE: x�'L" TITLE: L ti►`� l/ E O/L DATE: ,I l PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS y Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. i Supervisor Richard G. Ward '=: �� '.'., ' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 14, 1990 Kenneth F. Abbruzzo Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Major Subdivision of Bayberry Estates SCTM* 1000-55-6-35 & 36 56-1-1 Dear Mr. Abbruzzo: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 13, 1990 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the coordination process on this unlisted action. The Board assumes lead agency status and in that capacity makes an initial determination of non-significance. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated October 23, 1989. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of preliminary maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The preliminary submission must include road profiles and drainage plans. These maps will be forwarded by the Planning Board to the Engineer for review. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman 14S TRUSTEES SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor John M. Bredemeyer, III, President •� = ', �,�{. Henry P. Smith, Vice President - .{;;,:�:•; .._ '✓ Y '`� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: Planning Board FROM: Board of Trustees RE: Bayberry Estates, SCTM *1000-55-6-35,36; 56-1-1 DATE: July 18, 1990 The N.Y.S.D.E.C. wetland line as depicted on this survey accurately depicts the freshwater wetland boundary as inspected by the southold Town Trustees. Operations upland more than 75' from this line do not require any further review from this Board. CC: CAC JMB: jt . t i �c _- Town Hall, 53095 Main Road o P.O. Box 1179 i Telephone Oy Southold, New York 11971 1 (516) 765-1801 �1 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Planning Board From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Dated: July 5, 1990 Re: Bayberry Estates (formerly Francis O'Malley) SCTM# 1000-55-6-35,35 and 1000-56-1-1 The Conservation Advisory Council makes the following recommendation: The site appears to have no wetlands involved. X The wetlands sited on the map appear to correct. X] Map dated 2/2/90 ❑ Wetland appear to be involved. The map/survey. has been transmitted to the Southold Town Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary. The survey is not correct. Wetlands need to be staked by the Southold Town Trustees. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary Additional Comments: cc: Southold Town"Board of Trustees - l I. " New York State Department of E1!llrQflPll®ntai Conservation 6R LE Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION RESPONSE &), Z erry E 5 Ve-5 Dear $', This letter responds to your communication of %uJOS- lY, 1,'70 regarding lead agency coordination for the above-noted project, under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review - S.EQR) -of the Environmental Conservation law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Department has the following interest in this project: DEC Permits (if any) : DEC Contact Person: �/�1'��� �• h'1 o c l SEQR Classification: [ ] Type I Unlisted DEC Position: Based on the information provided: [�] DEC has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. [ ] DEC needs additional information In order to respond (see comments) . [ ] DEC cannot be lead agency because it has no jurisdiction in this action. Comments: [ ] see attached [ ] none If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact this office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under Part 617. Please feel free to contact this office for further information or .discussion. Sincerely, N-t IJ Sil! I i 2 2 ��9d cc: (attach distribution .list) TO: FILE FROM: Melissa Spiro, Planning Staff RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 56-1-1 DATE: August 16, 1990 Received telephone call from Jill Thorp, secretary for the Board of Trustees, indicating that the Trustees had no objection to the Planning Board taking Lead Agency. In addition, Jill mentioned that the Trustees had previously submitted a report to the _Planning Board on the above mentioned subdivision. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road ; �� ab SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 k. ( t'. � ':-`r Supervisor Southold, New York ?j -• Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 � Ww3 �� �' Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AUV'5 1990 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation. Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3 . Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: `(Ae-S Sc-'C rn-'lCLOD 55- A - 35 3ba„A ((-00 Requested Action• •-Qe5���A �-F COY 711, 15- SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( ' ) Unlisted Contact Person: _Me-1155,4 Sa ,ra 0 (516) -765-1938 �l r The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. �S Chairman cc: Beard ef- Appeals Board of Trustees Bui!ding=-D r-r�n-t Southold Town Board *.Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services .4�NYSDEC - Stony Brook rc S.G. Dept. of "-ublie Wer}�-s U.S. y GG p-ef—Engineers N—Y-.-:--3ept--of—T-r-anspor-tat-i on * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies a1 YOUNG 0& YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK zigot W — `J� 516-727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX 516-727-0144 HOWARD W.YOUNG Poofeeeional,Enquwav%F Land Sucveyoo Land cSumeyor August 1, 1990 Town of Southold Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 Att: Ms. Melissa Spiro Re: Bayberry Estates (Francis O'Malley) Southold, Town of Southold Dear Melissa: Pursuant to your inquiry, we have reviewed the depth of groundwater and the soil types at the above captioned site. We find no major discrepancies or errors in the Environmental Assessment Form but have prepared and are enclosing herewith an Addendum to the Environmental Assessment Form. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young H rv'Y u Encl. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. 1 YOUNG %'� YOUNG 400 O$TRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK rr9or 516-727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX 516-727-0144 HOWARD W.YOUNG Poofeeeional EngUwev RI:Land. 8urveyoo Land. Surveyor Bayberry Estates Southold Town of Southold (Francis O'Malley) Cluster Subdivision Addendum to Environmental Assessment Form August 1, 1990 Part 1 Item A 8 The elevation of groundwater is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level and since the ground elevations vary from elevation 15 to elevation 31, the depth of groundwater ranges from -12 feet to 27 feet. Perched water exists on the site at elevation 16.5 more or less. Part 1 Item A 4 Although the predominant Soil Type is Haven Loam, a list of all Soil Types are as follows: HaB Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes HaA Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes PmB 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded PmC 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Ca Canadice silt loam APPENDIX A EAF ENYIRO:lMEN1AL ASSESSMENTGD Proiect Information NOTICE: This document dw erred to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect an the anvlrcn~t. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to comleta PARTS 2 and 3. It is expected that comiction of the EAF will be dependent an information cur ently available and will not involve new studies. nsaars.1 or investigation. If information reluirino such additional work is unava`}ab1e. so indicate and: specify each instance. YAME OF PROJECT: NAME ANO ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different) Francis O'Malley Laurel Avenue, Southold, New York a� ADDRESS AND NAME OF APPLICANT: (Street) Francis O'Malley c/o Donald Rettaliata tale p) "' Esq. P}1oNE: 589-2500 285 West *Main Street reef Sayville, New York 11782 WrT tau p OESCRIPTIO4 OF PgGJECT- (Briefly describe type of project or action) Realty Subdivision (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate N.A. if not appiicabie) A. SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall project. both develooed and undeveloped areas) 1.• "Tral character of the land: Generally uniform slope Generally uneven and roiling or irregular. 2. Present land use: Urban Industrial i . Coma4rcial . Suburban X -. Rural _�-. Farest Agriculture ,der - 3. Total acreage of oroject area: 50 acres. Aooroaima U acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After Completion Meadow or Brvshland 39 acres 27,%cres Hater Surface Area 0 acres 0 ac-•ss Forested 3 acres 3 acres Unvegetated (rock. earth or fill) _0_acres 0--acres Aaricultural 0 acres 0 acres Roads. buildinas Hetland (Freshwater or and other paved Tidal as ner Articles surfmces 0 acres $acres :a. Z'S or F.C•L•) 8 acres 8 acres Other (indicate Lyme) 0 acres 9.1 acres Law a. +mat iS ^redominant soil types) on nro;ect site? Haven Loam 5• a t" ;nero �•arocx outcrojoines on +rnioct Sit!? - YeS - X• YC• M —! 9;t::_ "a: is ceotn to aedrac;? N/A `eet) R. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slates: 0-10% 1007. 1M-iSf %; 15S or " greater 7. Is project contiguoy; to. or contain a building or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? . - Yes XX No a. what is the depth to the water table?20-30feet 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project areal Yes _.�L_No 10. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered - Yes X .lo. according to - Identify each species 11. Art then any unique'or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs. dunes. other geologicil formations - Yes X No. (Describe ) 12. Is the project site,preesoently used by the came+unity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area - Yes 11CC 13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the caaasmity2 Yes I� No 14. Stream within or contiguous to project area: None a. Naar of straw and name of river to which it is tributary N/A 15. Lakes. Ponds. Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: - a. ilawe N/A b. Size (in acres) N/A 16. what is the dmM nant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). S. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 50 acres. b. Project acreage developed: 0 acres initially; 11 .9 acres ultimately- c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped d. Langth of project. in miles: N/A if appropriate) a. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot- age N/A developed acreage N/A f. Nuattr of off-stre't panting spaces existing 0 proposed 40 g. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour 2.5 (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: 7ne Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial X ultimate X I. If: Orientation ''.eighbornddd-City-Regional Estimated Employment Commercial Industrial J. Total heignt of tailest mronosed struC_tire /e!t. 2. Ha much natural material (i.e. rock. earth, etC.) will be removed from the site • 0 tans 0 ..cubic yards. 3. Now many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs. ground covers) will be remved fro■ site - 2$acres. 4. Will any matyre forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by tnrs project? A Yes No S. Are there any plans for re-vagetation to replace that removed during construction? _Yes .1.0 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months. (including demolition). 7.• If multi•-phased project: a. Total number of phases anticipatadN/A No. • b. Anticipated date of coat"encement phase Tal 1 month 1 987vear (including demo 1 i ti on) c. Approximate.completion date final phase Fal 1 nonthl 990 rear. d. Is phase 1 financially dependatt on subssauent "as"? Yes No N/A S. hill blasting occur during construction? Yes X No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction after project is complete �. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes __X No. If yes. exalain;-;: 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? X Yes 40. b. It1 . indicate type of waste (sewage.; industrial, etc.) Sewage s• c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will bt discharged N/A 13. Will surface area of existing laka!X ponds.'streams. bays or other surface watan:ays be increased or decreased by proposal? - Yes No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? Yes -1_No 13. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? -L_Yes No b. If yes. will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? ' X , Yes !b c. If yes9 give name: T/0 Southold : location Cutchogue d. 'dill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes &—No 16. Nill project use herbicides or pesticides? X Yes 40 Lawns 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? _ Yes Y No 18. Yill project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? _ Yes X No 19. 4111 project result in an increase in energy use? X Yes No. If yes. indicate types) 20. If water sucoly is from wells indicate cumoing capacity N/A gals/minute. 21. iotal anticinated water usage per day 6000 gals/day. 22. Zoning: a. What is dominant zoning classification of site? A - Residential/Agriculture b. Current specific zoning classification of site A - Reidentlal /A9rirultimA c. '.s or000sed use co^sisters- An Present zonimq? Y e s d. If no, indicate desired zoning _N�____•__ _,_•.-____ 25. Approvals: A. Is any Federal permit required? _ Yes _�No b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? _ Yes X No c. Local and Regional approvals: . Approval Required Submittal Approval (Yes. No) (Type) (Date) (Date) City. Torn, Village Board Aea QW5ter .City. Tow". Village Planning Board �T1ou 1 V 1 S I Q(1 City. Torn, Zoning Board City. County Health Department Other.--local agencies S Other regional agencies �Y�SITT ag COW. State Agencies Federal Agencies C. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as'.imy be needed to clarify your project. If then are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal. please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid Xhver—" PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: TITLE: L itA.J U E O/'L REPRESENTING: DATE: /V� EAF ENVIROW40TAL ASSESSMENT - PART II Protect Imoacts and Their Magnitude General Inf;+r-cstion IRmd Carefully) - In completing tha form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations boos reasorabled The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. - Identifying that ar. effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily st ificant. Any large effect must be,evalusted in PART 3 to determine significance.• By identifying an effectcolumn 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. - The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the threshold Of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific protect or site other examples and/or lower thresholds. my be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each protect. on each site', in each locality. will very. Therefore. the examples have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Reed Carefully) . a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART:2. Answer Yes if there will be a� effect. b. Maybe answrs should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. if impact threshold equals or exceeds any exampie provided. check column 2._. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example. check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact t4en consider trio impact as notentialiy large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the protect to a less than large magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates* that such a reduction is not possible. 1 2. . 3. SHALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON LAND Na YCS 1, WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANGE Ti) O O PROJECT SITE? Examples that Would .Aooly to Column 2 Any =nstru_tion on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise ner 100 foot Of lenatn), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed IOS. -.._ Construction on Lana where the death to the water table is less than 3 feet. — ronstruCtion of naved narking area fur 1."! or mare vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exnased or generally witRin 3 feet of existing ground surface. Cons=ruc i-, tna' will continue for more than 1 Year or involve more than Ore •+ease or stage. Excavation for .rin,na 3uraoses that would ►ernove mare than 1,-J00 tons cf ratural ma:erial (i.e. rock or soil) per Year. Constriction of any new ;anitary landf+ll•. i T !'ALL ',1 7nTENTI;.L CAN VIPACT BE 7ERATE LARGE 1E0UCE3 BY rwPa T !rrACT ogOJErT ruANq_ Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: 2. WILL THERE BE AN-EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNUSUAL Latin FnRMS %i� FOUND ON THE SITE? (f.e. Cliffa. dunes. aeoiagical forma- (\JH`J1 tions. etc.) Snecific land forms: IMPACT CH WATER An 3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY GATE? BODY DES MATED AS YES PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15. 24. 2S of the Envir-�•�•••�•O onmental Conservation lax. E.C.L.) EIAm01e3 that Would Aoply to Column 2 Oredgino more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other imoaets: 4. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY NON-PROTECTED EXISTING OR IFH NO YES BCOY OF WATE17 .................... n Esairoles that Would Apply to Column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. -- I ConstructiaTfia4 a body of water that exceeds in acres of surface area. -- _, Other famacts• S. '4!LL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR rnO1190'rATER nllA o �5 YES LITY. , Exarotes that `+ould AvVly ro Column 2 O ._ Pr•11ec: will require a discharge permit. ?roiect recuires use of a scurte of water that does not have 300rovai to serve ]racosed project. recu:res water suo:ly from wells with areater :nan 05 ial!ans ter minute lumoing capacity. -- _ C:rstruc:ion it operation causing any contamination of a OLolic water sucaly system. ProieC: will aaversely affect gr:undwater. �'cu'a !r"uent -till to conveyed off the sit. :- -- _— st•1':1es .nicn presently 10 'lot exist or have^ �- 'nace=uate :aoac:ty. s-::ec: •:uir•na a •acill!y :nap would use •wee.. in -- 0. .•:' .'<e'•+ _muse si':!:•on :r „r .sC^a re In .,:s:, ,� _:.� :f water :p --e e::2": nap -ery —_ :e an .:�•:us •.'s.,a; C:n:ris: ._ ,atur3l :ems. raLL TO MTEXTUL CAP IMPACT BE OERATE LARGE REOUCM OY IMPACT IMPACT PRIJJECT CHANGE 'ether Inoacts� 6. UILL PROJECT ALTER DRAINAGE FLV. PRTTER!M OR SURFACE HATER YO YES IPJNOFF? ...................................................OO Examle that `:ould Amply to Column 2 ProleCt wnuld imede flood rater flows. Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. �. Protect is inconatible with existing drainaoe patterns. Other impacts: [?TACT�i R 110 YES 7. WILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY?...........................0 F.xamolas that Would Apply to Colum 2 Project will induce 1.!l00 or more vehicle trips in any given w —� hour. Project will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Project emission rate of all contaminants will excaed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source oroducing Pore than 19 million BTU's per hour. i Other impacts: 1P ACT On PLANTS ANO ANII!1LS 1 MO YES a. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR EADAMERED SPECIES? O 0 Examoles that Would Apoly to Column 2 Reduction of ore or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site. over or near site or found on the site. Removal of anv oortion of a critical or sionificant wild- —� life hotbiUL _ Aoillcatinn of Pesticide or lerbicide over more than b-ics a year other• tfssn }ortgwr:uturnl purposes. Qttiir impacts: _ 9. HILL PROJECT SUBSTA7TIALLY AFFECT NON-THREATS M OR "a YES E90AMEREO SPECIES? .......................................0 O Esamole that Would Aooly to Coluer 2 Project would substantially interfere with•anv resident or migratory fish or wildlife species. Project requires the removal of more than In acres of mature forest (over Ion yews in ane) or other locally important vegetation. - rA Tn 0CTEP.TIAL GL': IVPACT aE ATE LARGE REDUCED MlCT I''r4C7 PROJECT CR4NIE [""ACT C,: ':ISViL 0ee1:7RCE 17. WILL THE 000'Jf.CT aerEC- VIe11e. yISTAS C1 T4F vrSIIAL �Ml YES CHARACTER OF THE *:F.IGH8nRuMO OP. C0~,gITv? O Examples that Would Avoly to Column j _ An incompatible visual affect caused by the introduction Of non materials. colors and/or forms in contrast to the surroundine landscape. A project easily visible. not easily screened,that Is obviously different from nthdrs around it. Project rill result in the elirination or major screening Of scenic views or vistas known to be im artant to the area. y _... Other impacts NPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURC t 1T. WILL PROJECT IMPACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC. NO YES PRE-HISTORIC nR PALE7dTDiMAL IMPTANCE? ................. �1 Examples that Gould AOoly to Cc]urn 2 `/ V Preject Occurino wholly or Martially within or contiguous to any facility or site, listed on the National Reaistar of historic Places. Any lmnact to an archeological site or fossil bad located within the project site. Other inaets: IMPACT ON OPEH SPACE a RECREATT01! 12. WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE OUANTITY OR DUAL M OF EXISTING NO YF.S OR FUTURE OPE11 SPACES OR RECREMONAL OPPORTUNITIES?...... 00 Examelts that Would Apply to Column 2 rho permanent foreclosure of a future recreational 0000rtunity. �• A major reduction of an oven space important to the coaewnity. Other fimoacm 1'A04CT nN T*AN5?f)RTATTO`1 13. :'ILL THERE SE AN EFFECT TO EXISTING TRANSPORTATION NO TES SYSTEM? ............................................... Examples ;mat Would Annly to Column 2 00 Alteration of present Patterns of nover'ent of neople and/or goods. PrO.:ect will r.Sult it severe trs+fic Mroolems. Other iir.Oac:S: .q. SMALL Tn PQTE'iTIAL CAN IMPACT CE MODERATE LA4GE REDUCED 8Y IMPACT P&PACT PROJECT CFANG-c IMPACT ON E'iERGY 14. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR No YES ENERGY SUPPLY? ...........................................00 Examples that would Apply to Column 2 Project causing greater than 5% increase in any form of energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two fasri 1 y residences. Other impacts: _ , •�..- IMPACT ON NOISE IS. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODDRS. NOISE. GLARE, YIBRATMN 40 YES �v or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ....0 0 Examoles that Would Avoly to Column 2 ,._.,,.. Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital. school or other sensitive facility. "Tian will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). _ Project will oroduce coerating noise exceedinn the �. local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. ._ Project will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: IMPACT ON HEALTH 5 MAIZR0= NO YES 16. !TILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY? .............^O Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 `J Project will cause a risk of exalosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides. chemicals, radiation. etc.) .. in the event of accident or uoset conditions. or there will be a chronic low level discharge or mission. _ Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" (i.e. toxic. poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive. irritating, infectious. etc., including wastes that are solid. semi-solid, liquid or contain gases.) Storage fecilitips for one million or more gailnns of liquified natural gas or other liouids. •• Other impacts: 11 LL M PO I G1111AL CAA l4 n 1 8C DE.R!!T� LARGE RE-uUCE7 aY ;?:PACT iI.PACT DROJ;CT Ci'..NGE (PPACT Of! GRO,,r14 AND C4ARAC7eR OF COO !�AITY Oa •IE1,aonpunn0 17. HILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAPACT^eo ^F THE EXISTING !i0 YES CO..-%'.41TY? ................................................0 O Examole that would Apoly to Colson 2 _ The population of the City. Town or Village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5: of resident human population. The municipal budgets far capital enpenditures or opera- ting services will increase by more than 5. per year as a result of this project. Aill involve any oernanent facility of a non-agricultural use in in agricultural district or remove nrime agricultural lands from cultivation. The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities. structures or areas of historic importance to the c--munity. _ Development will induce an influx of a particular age group with special needs. Project will set an important precedent for future projects. Project will relocate 15 or more employees in one or rare businesses. Other impacts: Na YES 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT? m ......O O Examales'that Would Apply to Colu 2 Either government or-citizens of adjacent communities have exzressed ocoosition or rejected the project or have not been contacted. Objections to the nro.ject from within the community. IF ANY ACTION IN PART 2 IS IDEifTIFIED AS A POTEifTiAL LARGE IHP.ACT OR IF YOU CANNOT DETEMINE THE .11AG:11TUDE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTIONS OF EAF CCIiPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT: DETERMINATION PART I PART II PART 3 Upon review of the information recordm an this EAF (Parts 1. 2 and 3) and considering both the magnitude and importance of each Imoact. it is re.asonaoly determined that: PREPARE A /IE"ATIVr_ OCCLARATICH A. The crojee. will result to no major impacts and. therefore. O is one -nice may not cause significant oamace :o :.".e environment. 9. Althouan :he Praiec: could have a s-.cnificlnt effect on the environment. :Isere will not be a significant effect in :his case eRE?ARE A 10-.A i'IE IE_LARATMI because the mitigation measures described in ?!= 3 have been O included as par: of the oracosed irojec:. C. The nrojec: will result in one or more major adverse imoac:s PRE?'RE 27S:7.:'/E ^E' :RaTiJ:l PROC WI'R _iS :hat c3nnet oe reduced and may cause sinnificant aamaae zo:he envircnment. 0 :ate r----- �tcna:ire a•s:Cns: .e .._ !: f _?it 3gencv iiy^a[�r• �: a^.r-7re. :14 `^::n .esnor.s:31e or-_. . 'IC' �' y 1 • • APPy'TDIT B - S_HaRT L'M.Q0Ml—1TAL ASSESSMENT FORM zNSTR►,�Tioh s: (a) In order to answer the questions in this short W is is iasumed that the preparer will use currently available information concerning the project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not expected that additional studies, research ' or other investigations will be undertakan. (b) If any question•haa been answered Tes the project may be sigmificant and a completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary• (c) If•all questions have been answered No it is likely that this project is not significant. (d) Environmental Assessment 1. Will project result in a large physical change to the project site or physically alter more than 10 acres. of land? • Tao No 2• Will there be •a major change to any unique or unusual land form found on the site? . . yes _� No 3e Will project alter or have a large effect on an existing body of water? . Tea'_ No L. Will project have a potentially large impact an groundwater quality? . . . . . . Tea No 3e Will project significant17 effect drainage flow On adjacent sites? • • • • • • • • • • • • �� Tea No 6. 'dill project affect any threatened or endangered plant or animal species? . . . . • Tea No 7. . Will project result in a major adverse effect an air quality? Yes No 3. Will project have a major effect an visual char - actar -of the community or scenic views or vistas khown to be important to the community? Yes No �. Will project adversely impact any site or struct- ure of historic, pre-historic, or paleontological W importance or or any site designated as a critical environmental area by a local agency? • Tes No 40o Will project have a major effect on existing or future recreational apportunities2 • yes No 11. Will project result in major traffic problems or / cause a major effect to existing transportation systems? . . . . . . . . Yes No / 12. Will project regularly cause.objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibratJon, or electrical disturb—ance as a result of the project's operation? Yes Ye ; / 13. Will project have any impact an public health or safety? . . Yes No / lw• Wi'_1 project affect the existing cammuLit't by directly causing a growth :n permanent pcptaa- ticn of more than. 5 percent over a ona-year period cr have a major negati•te ef:ac_ on :he i character of the commuri:y ,. .r reignbo cod? . . Yas Vc 15. Is were public centrO'rer=/ _cncern:ag t:a PGrPAP.=?'S ST-mm ME: 3EPRES"E T:YG: _ 0A _. 9/L/78 •r L� EAF EHYIROitMENTAI ASSESSMENT - PART III .IVAUATTO:! OF THE TMPnRTAVCE OF IMPACD INFORMATION - Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially larae. - The amount of writino necessary to answer Dart 3 may be determined by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I plated in this record sufficient information to indicate the reasonableness of qv decisions? INSTRUCTIONS Complete the followinq for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 0' Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if apolicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than large impact by a pro- ject change. 3. Used on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this imact is important to the mrinicipality (city, town or village) in which the project is located. To answer the question of importance. consider: - The probability of the impact or effect occurring - The duration of the impact or effect - Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources cr values - Whether the impact or effect can be controlled - The regional consequence of the Imi+act or effect 1 - Its potential divergence from local needs and goals - Whether known objections to the project apply to this impact or effect. DETEWINATION OF SIMIFICANCE I An action is considered to be significant if: wine (or more) imoact is determined to bath larne and its (their) consequence, based an the review above. is important. PART III STATEiMS 1 (Continue an Attachments. as needed) Structural-Archaeological Assessment Form (Addendum to EAF) Applicant Name: Francis O'Malley Project Location: Laurel Avenue, Southold, New York Part B. Project Information (Applicant) 1. Is project continguous to, or contain a structure or archaeological site listed in the State/National Register of Historic Places? yes X no Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes; 0-10% 100 %; 10-15% %; 15% or greater,. %. 3. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with the following drainage charac- teristics: well drained 80 %; moderately well drained 0 %; poorly drained 20 %. (Use the Soil Survey classifications for your county). 4. Has the land within the proposed project area been previously disturbed/altered (excavated, mined, landscaped, filled, utilities installed)? yes no X If yes, briefly describe each. i 5. Ace there any buildings/structures built prior to 1940 and/or listed on the State Register of Historic Places within or adjacent to the proposed project area? yes no X ' If "yes", provide the following information for each building/structure (use attachments if needed): a.)• type of structure (eg. house, outbuilding, barn, bridge, dam tunnel), b.) location, c.) approximate age. Photographs which illustrate the general nature of the project area can assist the environmental analyst in his/her review. Submittal of photos is optional and not a required component of the initial EAF. Part II: Evaluation (Environmental Analyst) 1. Archaeological Concerns a.) Is the' proposed action within a circle or square identified on the OPRHP maps? yes no b.). Is the.-area under review apparently undisturbed*9 yes no (Please contact CRS for assistance in evaluating disturbance.) c.) Will the proposed action include a physical disturbance of the area? yes no d.) Is the slope in the area less.than 15%?* yes no * Unless on limestone/flint escarpments. If the answer is yes to all of the preceding questions, refer to the Cultural Resource Secticr:. 2. Structural Concerns :Will the project alter the physical character or sightline of any building or structure built prior to 1940 or listed on the State/National Register of Historic Places? If -"yes", refer to the Cultural Resource Section and provide photographs for each historic structure affected. Part III: Determination — Refered to the Cultural Resource Section for review. — No referral to the Cultural Resource Section. SHPA Review complete. Date Signature of Preparer `ram DEC Permit Number DEC 3/85 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS + ( r�f SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman eY t4Y �' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. a✓A�^ ?^ aj Richard G. Ward �� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald :� P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938_ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 14, 1990 Kenneth F. Abbruzzo Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Major Subdivision of Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 56-1-1 Dear Mr. Abbruzzo: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 13, 1990 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the coordination process on this unlisted action. The Board assumes lead agency status and in that capacity makes an initial determination of non-significance. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated October 23, 1989. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of preliminary maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The preliminary submission must include road profiles and drainage plans. These maps will be forwarded by the Planning Board to the Engineer for review. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, k7w�e5�; �� Bennett Orlowski, Jr. S Chairman y ` YOUNG oji YOUNG �5(A&111 PLE 400 08TRANDER AVENUE 04—s 3 RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK zz9oz r 516-727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG PAX 516-727-0144 HOWARD W.YOUNG Poofessiormt Engineev 4F Land Savveyoc Land Susveyoc August 1, 1990 Town of Southold Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 Att: Ms. Melissa Spiro Re: Bayberry Estates (Francis O'Malley) Southold, Town of Southold Dear Melissa: Pursuant to your inquiry, we have reviewed the depth of groundwater and the soil types at the above captioned site. We find no major discrepancies or errors in the Environmental Assessment Form but have prepared and are enclosing herewith an Addendum to the Environmental Assessment Form. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young HWY 1c, Encl. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. s.. 1,��fy S '�ys-11Li 90 YOUNG 0& YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEsAD, NEW YORK zz9or 516-727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX 516-727-0144 HOWARD W.YOUNG Poofessional Engine 4F Land Savveyoo Lund Susveyoc Bayberry Estates Southold Town of Southold (Francis O'Malley) Cluster Subdivision Addendum to Environmental Assessment Form August 1, 1990 Part 1 Item A 8 The elevation of groundwater is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level and since the ground elevations vary from elevation 15 to elevation 31, the depth of groundwater ranges from 12 feet to 27 feet. Perched water exists on the site at elevation 16. 5 more or less. Part 1 Item A 4 Although the predominant Soil Type is Haven Loam, a list of all Soil Types are as follows: HaB Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes HaA Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes PmB 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded PmC 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes, , eroded Ca Canadice silt loam ��S�FFo�KIpGy e's o TRUSTEES = SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III, President n • Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President �i,' O� 'yo1 y!� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: Planning Board FROM: Board of Trustees RE: Bayberry Estates, SCTM #1000-55-6-35,36; 56-1-1 DATE: July 18, 1990 The N.Y.S.D.E.C. wetland line as depicted on this survey accurately depicts the freshwater wetland boundary as inspected by the southold Town Trustees. Operations upland more than 75' from this line do not require any further review from this Board. cc: CAC JMB:jt ocwFFDL,Y�D yvt 5 o Z Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1801Ol �� Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Planning Board From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Dated: July 5, 1990 Re: Bayberry Estates (formerly Francis O'Malley) SCTM# 1000-55-6-35,35 and 1000-56-1-1 The Conservation Advisory Council makes the following recommendation: The site appears to have no wetlands involved. I� The wetlands sited on the map appear to correct. U Map dated 2/2/90 . Wetland appear to be involved. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Southold Town Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary. aThe survey is not correct. Wetlands need to be staked by the Southold Town Trustees. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary .._Additional Comments: L - 6,l990 SOtITr';;)L ;-rrs1 cc: Southold Town�Board of Trustees i` ( f+� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 _ 4W Supervisor Southold, New York Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 � Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOL 4 r� P e� ? 1 TO: John Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees a : MAR 19 0990 FROM: Melissa Spiro UE���=--,---� _---•-•- . Planning Staff TO rVi°. DATE: March 16, 1990 RE: Subdivision Proposal for Bayberry Estates (formerly Francis O'Malley) SCTM# 1000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Attached please find a copy of the Standard. subdivision map dated September 25, 1989, and the Cluster sketch plan dated October 23, 1989, for the above mentioned subdivision. A previous submission, with a different layout, was reviewed by both the Planning Board and the Town Trustees. A copy of your Board' s March 21, 1989 report is attached for your reference. Before the Planning Board makes a determination on the yield for the parcel, they would like your comments on the wetlands line which was flagged by the N.Y.S:D.E.0 and located on the map on June 1, 1989. Please. note that although the Planning Board will -be coordinating with your office pursuant, to SEQRA, it would like your Board' s comments as to the location of the wetlands line as shown at this time. If at all possible, receipt of your comments by March 26th (the next Planning Board meeting) , would be appreciated. Please .let me know if you require any additional information. Thank you in advance for your assistance. enc. HENRY P. SMITH JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, "III, President TELEPHONE John Bednoski, Jr. � . (516)765-1892 ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. , Vice-President BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 - Southold, New York 11971 March 21, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 RE: Bayberry Estates, SCTM No. 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Transmitted herewith are comments regarding the above referenced project as requested by your Department as follows: 1. No drainage discharge into the wetlands. Discharge is to be made to- man-made drainage areas and should have pre-treatment if possible. 2. Wetland line does not appear identified as to agency? The Trustees would like a Trustees/NYS DEC approved line with a 100' buffer minimum around same. 3 . dounty bept. of- Health Services, -Office of- Ecology, . ...Suggestions of the Southold Town Planning Dept. and - - — `the Suffolk are well= founded. Very truly yours, . John M. Bredemeyer, III - Cl President Board of Town Trustees JMB:ip so �NNI GBOARD , - r✓��C f Qj��:j Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 SCOTT L. HARR:S Southoldi 71w York Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-18 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: John Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees FROM: Melissa Spiro ,0.% Planning Staff DATE: March 16, 1990 RE: Subdivision Proposal for Bayberry Estates (formerly Francis O'Malley) SCTM# 1000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Attached please find a copy of the Standard subdivision map dated September 25, 1989, and the Cluster sketch plan dated October 23, 1989, for the above mentioned subdivision. A previous submission, with a different layout, was reviewed by both the Planning Board and the Town Trustees. A copy of our Board's March 21, 1989 report is attached for y your reference. Before the Planning Board makes. a determination on the yield for the parcel, they would like your comments on the wetlands line which was flagged b} .the N.Y.S.D.E.0 and located on the map on June 1, 1989. Please note that although the Planning Board will be coordinating with your office pursuant to SEQRA, it would like your Board' s comments as to the location of the wetlands line as shown at this time. If at all possible, receipt of your comments by March 26th (the next Planning Board meeting) , would be appreciated. Please let me know if you require any additional information. Thank you in advance for your -assistance. enc. 1 i HENRY P. SMITH, a �•: JOHN M. BREPresident � ►.i .�`""" 4. DEMEYER, III P o :;, = TELEPHONE John � resident cn + 1,.:' �� xoIVE Bednoski, Jr. ,. �yA{' (516) 765-189, ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. , Vice-President _a BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 - - I Southold, New York 11971 March 21, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 RE: Bayberry Estates, SCTM No 1000 56 1 1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Transmitted herewith are comments regarding the above referenced project as requested by your Department as follows: 1. No drainage discharge into the wetlands. Discharge is to be made to man-made drainage areas and should have pre-treatment if possible. 2. Wetland line does not appear identified as to agency? The Trustees would like a Trustees/NYS DEC approved line with a i 100 ' buffer minimum around same. 3 . Suggestions of the Southold- Town PlanningDept. and the Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services, Office of Ecology, are well founded. Very truly yours, !John M. Bredemeyer, III President Board of Town Trustees JMB:ip D � � KINNHNg BOAR SU,r--�R '� PS NIS YOUNG T, YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK z19oi 516-727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX 516-727-0144 HOWARD W.YOUNG Pvofessional Engineev 4F Land 8avveyoc Land 8uvveyov February 1, 1990 Town of Southold Planning Department Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ATTN: Ms. Melissa Spiro —5—_ (p — 3 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES at Southold, T/O Southold, New York (n85-1482) TawnGr�u �G1vwi1.G1.5 IFY��l$ OI�. Dear Melissa: II Enclosed herewith please find twelve (12) prints of the Standard Subdivision Sketch Plan dated September 25, 1989, and twelve (12) prints of the Cluster Subdivision Sketch Plan dated October 23 , 1989, for the above captioned project. These new maps have been prepared in accordance with comments from the Planning Board, trustees and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. After you have reviewed these plans, Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. and I would be pleased to come in and discuss this project. Your prompt attention to this matter would be appreciated. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young HWY'�Ot Encl. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. it FEB - 21990 /) NG T, YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK Ilgo! 516-7�2 7-2303 y' 2ALDEN W.YOUNG � l�J L_ "-`'�r " ' HOWARD W.YOUNG Peofeeaional Engineee V Land Sncveyoa j 'i Lund Suaveyoc 0 �9B9 I� " FEB - February 8, 1989 New York State Department Of Environmental Conservation Building 40- SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11794 ATTN: Mr. Paul Carella RE: Bayberry Estates . Francis O'Malley at Southold, T/O Southold, New York Dear Mr. Carella, Enclosed herewith please find one (1) print of Sheet 1 of 2 of the Preliminary Subdivision Map prepared for Francis O'Malley at Southold, Town of Southold, New York, together with a copy of correspondence from the Board of Town Trustees of the Town of Southold, dated March 21, 1988 . It is the wishes of our client and of the Town of Southold that your Department indentify and flag the wetlands on these premises. Please inform us when you have completed this task so that our field crew may locate the flagged line and depict it on our survey. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young HWY/sj Encl. cc: Do ld A. Rettaliata, Esq. own of Southold Planning Board ATTN: Ms. Melissa Spiro a'N1�11ey 55 - 6 - 3S, 36 Ss - s /emu ('e w . 0?t'-A s u Wo y i d c'), WA,�f L'-' id � i � i LAW OFFICES J" N 3 1989 MARS, SLOANE & CONLON SOUTHOLD TOWN 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY PLANNING BOARD HAUPPAUGE,N.Y.11788 TELECOPIER 516-232-1717 (516)232-1747 January 11, 1989 TOWN OF SOUTHHOLD Main Road Southhold, NY 11971 Attention: Melissa Spiro Re: Map of .=Bayberry Estates Southhold, "NY Dear Melissa: This is to confirm that Howard Young and myself have an appointment with you on February 3rd, 1989 at 10 :00 A.M. as to the above pending subdivision application. The Planning Board originally approved a yield of 20 lots and a sketch plan was submitted and approved. Preliminary subdivision map was then filed, and no hearing has ever been set as to the preliminary map. At a meeting in 1988 , it was indicated that the yield should be used according to a formula set forth in your ordinance. Recently, it has come to my attention through Howard Young that the Planning Board is again using yield maps for the formula and clustered subdivision. The purpose of our meeting on February 3 , 1989 would be to confirm the method of establishing yield,and how we should be proceeding at this time so that a hearing can be held on the preliminary map. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Cordially, MARS, SLOANE & CON.LON- Donald A. Rettaliata DAR:au P yFF� TO �OAF SxO��,i�I D S L E-O.L Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 29, 1988 Francis O'Malley 240 Secatogue Lane West Islip, NY 11795 RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM # 1000-55-6-35 56-1-1 Dear Mr. O'Malley: Enclosed please find the comments from the Town Trustees regarding the above mentioned subdivision. Please comply with their comments, when the drainage is designed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, � BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JRJ. CHAIRMAN Enc:cc: Howard Young ' Donald Rettaliata Robert Brown HENRY P. SMITH, JOHN M. BREDEMEYER,"III-, President 'T (51) 765-01 92 John.vBednoski, .Jr. Q A ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. , Vice-President BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 March 21, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 RE: Bayberry Estates, SCTM No. 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Transmitted herewith are comments regarding the above referenced project as requested by your Department as follows: 1. No drainage discharge into the wetlands. Discharge is to be made to man-made drainage areas and should have pre-treatment if possible. 2. Wetland line does not appear identified as to agency? The Trustees would like a Trustees/NYS DEC approved line with a 100 ' buffer minimum around same. 3 . Suggestions of the Southold Town Planning Dept. and the Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services, Office of Ecology, are well founded. Very truly yours, John M. Bredeineyer, III President Board of Town Trustees JMB:ip n fl MAR 2 4 1988 SOl1THOLD TOWN 4 rLANNING BOpRO SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON Sidney B.Bowne,P.E.,L.S. ( Roland Anders (1922-1959) andu� AN Roger L.Cocchi Chester C Kelsey, P.E.,L.S. 45 Manor Road Francis❑ �� Francis J.Lynch Alexandre W.Mercil, P.E. Philip Schlotzhauer Robert A.Stanton,P.E. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 Joseph F.Stegman Robert W. Brown, L.S. (516) 724-0611 Paul F.Stevens Zabdiel A.Blackman,P.E., L.S. William T.Styne Richard B.Weber George A.Style,P.E. Jerry D.Almont,P.E. GeorgeL.Fagan,Jr.,Ph.D.,P.E. January 21, 1988 Frank Capobianco,C.E. Thomas R.Pynchon,L.S. Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr., Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Preliminary Subdivision Map for Bayberry Estates -at Southold (SBB No. 87149) Dear Mr. Orlowski : We have reviewed the drainage design for the above referenced subdivision and at this time we have the following comments: 1) The leaching pools proposed for tributary areas 1 and 2 (at the entrance) are adequate for a 2" rainfall . 2) The ponding area proposed for all other tributary areas (3 through 9) is adequate for a 6" rainfall . It should be noted, however, that test holes indicate groundwater at the level of the design bottom of the ponding area. This precludes any significant groundwater recharge. Once capacity is exceeded, the site runoff, incuding a contribution from more than an acre of pavement, would overflow into the adjacent wetland. If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS 6att c;4_ VINCENT MARICONDA Encl . VM:dd MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/H P AWN 1Nd; BOA D TOW—=N 0E , S40LJ= D M S LqF TY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 . MEMORANDUM To: Jay Bredemeyer ,III, President Board of Trustees From:Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: Proposed subdivision of Bayberry Estates, SCTM # 1,000-55-6-35 and 36, 1000-56-1-1. Date:March 4, 1988 The enclosed map shows a subdivision layout adjacent to a fresh water wetland. The Planning Board has requested design changes in this layout; namely the moving of Lot 1 away from the wetland and the reduction of lot areas to 40, 000 square feet further, it was suggested that the retention pond be moved out of Trustee' s jurisdiction because of the regrading involved in its construction. I have recommended that the stormwater runoff at least be filtered before being allowed to overflow into the wetland. Your input is requested on two items: 1. Does the wetlands line as shown on this map agree with the Trustee' s line? 2. Under what terms would Trustees allow stormwater runoff to be introduced into the wetland if at all? Inasmuch as the layout is being changed now, your Board' s comments would be most welcome. For your background I am enclosing correspondence from the County ®ffice of Ecology and the State Department of Environmental Conservation regarding this wetland. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Valerie Scopaz cc: Francis D. O'Mally Howard Young Donald A. Rettaliata Planning Board jt MEMORANDUM TO: ...FILE FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner . RE: DATE: W— go A'/iV SIDNEYE B. BOWNE .& SON: ': Sidney B.Bowne,P.E.,L.S. (���d 6 �� / Roland Anders Roger L.Cocchi Anders (1922-1959) 45 Manor Road Francis J.Lynch Philip Chester C Kelsey, P.E.,L.S. Philip Schlotzhauer Alexandre W. Mercil, P.E. Joseph F.Stegman Robert A.Stanton,P.E. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 Paul F.Stevens Robert W. Brown,L.S. (516) 72'4-0611 William T.Styne Zabdiel A. Blackman,P.E.,L.S. Richard B.Weber George A.Style,P.E. Jerry D.Almont,P.E. January 21, 1988 George L.Fagan,Jr.,Ph.D.,P.E. Frank Capobianco,C.E. Thomas R.Pynchon,L.S. Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr., Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Preliminary Subdivision Map for Bayberry Estates at Southold (SBB No. 87149) Dear Mr. Orlowski : We have reviewed the drainage design for the above referenced subdivision and at this time we have the following comments: 1) The. leaching pools proposed for tributary areas 1 and _2 (at the entrance) are adequate fora 2" rainfal-1-. 2) The ponding area proposed for all other tributary areas (3 through 9) is adequate for a 6" rainfall . It should be noted, however, that test holes indicate groundwater at the level of the design bottom of the ponding area. This precludes any significant groundwater recharge. Once capacity is exceeded, the site runoff, incuding a contribution from more than an acre of pavement, would overflow into the .adjacent wetland. If you have any questions regarding the ' above, please- do not , hesitate to contact this office. j . Very truly yours, x SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON j' _ _----- CONSULTING . ENGINEERS --�y� n arc a,�� VINCENT MARICONDA ' Encl . ` VM:dd MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/H COUNTY OF SUFFOLK A Michael A. LoGrande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING LEE E.KOPPELMAN 360-5513 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING July 28, 1987 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: i Prelim ri_ar_y Map ---Francis O'Mal`ley n/wly/c L.•I.R.R. -(M:T:A.) and Laurel Avenue, Southold, New York. Gentlemen: Pursuant to Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the above captioned plat is not within the jurisdiction of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning by Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Division CGL:mb File No. 1333-NJ-87-16 RECEIVE® BY Enclosed: Map S�UJ�Q�T�`�1PLq��G,gOARD J UU L. DATE lI y 7 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE,L.I.,NEW YORK 1 1788 (51 6)360-5192 P 'A,,NING''B;QA' _ TQi°,,,Q 'SOU. I D S FOLK OU. Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 Subdivision Review Section Suffolk County Department of Planning H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building' - 12th Flr. Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11787 Gentlemen: We are hereby submitting the preliminary subdivision map X located in SOv O __ to yoA forJyour comments . This proposed subdivision when in proposed final plat stage will be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission pursuant to Sec- tion 1333 , Article XIII of the Suffolk County Charter. We, therefore, acknowledge that the comments made by the staff of the Planning De- partment on the preliminary subdivision map are advisory only and do not constitute a review by the Suffolk County Planning Commission nor are comments made by the staff binding upon the Commission in its re- view of this proposed subdivision. Tax Parcel Identifier Number: Co Materials submitted: Preliminary Map (3 copies) Topographic Map (1 copy) X ; Drainage Plan (1 copy) _; Street Profiles (1 copy) ; Proposed Grading Plan (1 copy) ; Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Comments : (a� _ nate . -� n Y La x " N�i Very truly yours , Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Southold Town Planning Board r fo��T P LYAN.'. 1 G B O°A; 'D TQ9 =-N O SOtJ d'IT-LD w� P Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 Robert Brown Sidney and Bowne and Son Hauppague, NY 11787 Dear Mr. Brown: Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following: A plication of �a'or subdivisio minor subdivision, site plan) }I r r Hamlet SoU4-)(:)t6 MATERIAL SUBMITTED: File # Suffolk County Tax Nap No. �OCb �jrj—(o- Sketch plan Preliminary map Street Profile s Grading Plan _X Preliminary site plan Final Map Other Comments: mQ� ��}� �QA}p�nu r rk Qk`V.1 cs%, L � k �. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,CHAI �O� SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING--BOARD PLANNING)'BO"ARD O oVN OF SOU ,I€;OID Si1F.F6-Lk-uCO:UN,TY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 Robert Brown Sidney and Bowne and Son Hauppague, NY 11787 Dear Mr. Brown: Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following: A plication of `'a'or subdivisio minor subdivision, site plan) Hamlet SOU-L- )aaC' MATERIAL SUBMITTED: File Suffolk County Tax Yap No.j �=��j�(�--=cJ_ �—� Sketch plan cl�o Preliminary map_x Street Profiles. Grading Plan X— Preliminary site plan Final Map Other Comments: ) 11QA1P Jnc ►- Cent Y't 2 lLClJ �`n `r-�l�'n o L K n n Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING- BOARD �Q: � r � New York State Department of Environmental Conservation SUNY, Bldg. 40 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Thomas C. .Jorling (516) 751-7900 commissioner July 21, 1987 Ms. Valerie Scopaz Planning Board - Town 'Hall Town of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Dear Ms. Scopaz: Thank you for your letter of 7/13 regarding the Francis O'Malley subdivision, near Laurel Avenue, Southold, N.Y. . I have reviewed our files for information concerning endangered and threatened species at this site, and find no record of nesting, breeding, and/or significant use by currently listed species in the area as outlined on your map. Please be advised that the above statement should in no way be construed as precluding current, not documented use or future use by state listed species. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at 751-7900, ext. 248. Sincerely, Michael cheibel Wildlife Biologist MSS/sjmr RECEIVED BY SOUTHOLD TOWN Nwill-j( OO�RD DATE r COl TY OF SUFFOLK SOUIt�� n $), � I •� SATE Michael A. LoGrande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS.M.D.,M.P.H. COMMISSIONER r July 16 , 1987 Mr Bennett Orlowski Southold Town Planning Board Town Hail Southold , New York 11971 RE : Preliminary Subdivision Map for Francis O ' Malley S . C . T . M . : 1000-055-6- ( 35 , 36 ) 1000-56-1 - ( 1 ) Dear Mr . Orlowski : As per your request , the Suffolk . County Department of Health Services ( SCDHS ) Office of Ecology has reviewed the above-referenced-- preliminary subdivision map , and we submit the following comments regarding the sanitary code and natural resources concerns . I . Sanitary Code There is no record of an application being received on this project . The site plan does indicate that the project meets the yield requirements for the use of individual sewage systems . This project must comply with all other regulations under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code . SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sanitary disposal and water supply systems . Therefore , the applicant should not undertake the construction of any such system without Health Department approval . II . Natural Resources A. The following two sources should be contacted in order to ascertain whether or not any rare , special concern , threat- ened or endangered species of plants and/or animals occur on the site : Dr . Robert Zaremba NYS Natural Heritage Program The Nature Conservancy P . O . Box 72 Cold Spring Harbor , NY 11724 ( 516 ) 367-3225 COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD.N.Y. 1 1901 Letter to Bennett Orlowski July 16 , 1987 Page 2 Mr . Michael Scheibel NYS Department of Environmental Conservation SUNY at Stony Brook Stony Brook , NY 11794 ( 516 ) 751 -7900 B . The wetland line represented on the subdivision map does not indicate the source used in delineation . This is a State- regulated wetland--boundaries should be delineated or approved by the Division of Fish and Wildlife of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ( NYSDEC ) . Activities undertaken within 100 feet of this approved boundary would require an NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands Permit . C . In the interest of preserving the integrity of the wetland , we recommend that no construction or clearing activities be undertaken within 100 feet of the approved boundary. Furthermore , we strongly suggest that no sanitary systems or stormwater recharge areas be located within this 100-foot buffer zone . Specifically, we are in opposition to the location of the "ponding area" adjacent to the wetland and suggest that other alternative sites and methods of stormwater recharge be explored . To lessen the capacity needed in the ponding area , an increase in on-site recharge through the use of a more extensive leaching ring series along installed drainage lines and leaching capability at each catch basin may be one viable option . D . We suggest that an alternative site plan that maximizes the buffer around the freshwater wetland be submitted for consideration . This may be accomplished by transferring open space areas outlined on the current site plan to the wetland buffer zone . We appreciate the opportunity to review this preliminary subdivision map . Should you have any questions or concerns , please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at your convenience . Sincerely, kZ Louise W . Harrison Supervisor , Bureau of Environmental Management Office of Ecology LWH/ta _ RECEIVE® By - TnHOLD Il`N PLANNIN �r B BOARD 1987 New York ' Heritage Program Natural , ------------- Wildlife Resources Center Delmar, New York.12054 C (518)439-7488 Ms. Valerie Scopaz Planning Board Town of Southold Cold Spring Southold, New York 11971 July 14, 19 I L. Dear Ms. Scopaz: i This letter is in response to your request for information on rare species and communities on a site in Southold (see attached topo). I have reviewed our files and find that there is no information available specific to this site. To my knowledge m one from our staff has visited this area. There are m historical records on file specific to this section of the Town of Southold. That, of course, does not mean that field work might not locate occurrences of rarities. I hope that these comments will be helpful in your assessmentiof this ` site. If you have any other questions concerning occurrences of rare species or communities in the Town of Southold, do not hesitate to contact�me or our office in Delmar at the Five Rivers Environmental Center. Thank you for using the New York Natural Heritage database. j Sincerely, Robert E. Zaremba Botanist j NY Natural Heritage Program i I New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and The Nature Conservancy with support from Return a Gift to Wildlife contributions i I P z TO D cry , s Southold, N.Y. 11971 I (516) 765-1938 October 29, 1987 1. A yield map has not been submitted yet; therefore the yield shown herein should not be assumed to be correct. 2. Road drainage should not go into wetland. This wetland may be a critical habitat. We are trying to obtain more information on this. 3. EAF is not accurate, re: soils. See soil survey data attached. 4, It seems unlikely that statement 8 on EAF is correct. Re: depth to groundwater. I will ask for a tighter cluster to reduce northerly road's length and to create better lots along that road I will wait for your input on before requesting revisions of the lot layout. Valerie Scopaz 1 lu r'..« .-��� izs. .•�y ilUh :LANE/ "'�t:�' -• -a / B o-.. _ I tip•;` �r � � `,�;,��� -•-. .,�:: °� . / :. `•. :.;� �:,k: /' f; Cove -10 %•/. zo �1/q o •� / •-l. - � � .,. ,:. '' o --5�-ice a :, l/�b• G •1 0� ,;, - .p'.'fit..' _ - �•• .�', _ .. io Mdd q Pon s /O Conkling p 77 iL A /� r .. .. s// 90 enntngS-ps/ 1 41S h` ra 1 s/ 'a .Y�i'• 'io a `' ' t s�lt`•°S T1 i ' GU" t } �,. [eft,. a •t. 6./ •` .l\ Ok3l - 1 _D 3l •20 53 10\C 'a 11 s:J( •. C�, ': -Founders 1\ 26 �D•�� •��. ` :�T P g ark a Pt rP3rs 2 S H.I�'/ T ss \ Cr' 23� E R �� I S L 35 l,� A N D s outhold 24 • AJ L �, Bay /7 28 \ 70 I g 34 2/ / SO ZI N D 39 30 28 Yacht Club Point 6 ese 1 i Soo \ Y�j, ' �o 4� d {!•eci� a Wq 300000� 1UR ,�• /4 . Cedaz �•, • ,L.$ i each i .B �" APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . .BAYB.ERRY. .ES.TATF,S . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. .. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . ... .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The,land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber 7655 Page 14. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . On June 13 , 1974 .. Liber .7195. .. . . .. .. .. ....... Page . . .Q1.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . On . . JulY. .11, . 1972 Liber 7194. .. . . .. .. . . .. .. .. . Page . .59.7 . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . On . ..Ju1Y. .11,. .1972 Liber . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . ... .. . Page . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . On . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . .. . . ; Liber . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. ....... Page . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. . On . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . .. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . or as distributee . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .... .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . ... . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . ............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . 5. The area of the land is . .. .50 acres . . acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except none. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 7. The land is encumbered by . .nR ... . .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . mortgage (s) a`sx%l'iiC-xxxxx (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . in original amount of $. . . . . . . . . . . .. . unpaid amount $ . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held by . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . ad'dress . .. .... . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . in original amount of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . unpaid amount $. .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . held by . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . address . .. .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . in original amount of . . . .. . . . . . . .. . unpaid amount $. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . held by . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . address . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except . .e leCtrAC.. . . . . . . .. . agxe.emant:.recorded .in.Liber. .1324. .at. .P.aga . 3.71. .. .. . . .. ... ... ... .. . . . ... 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts . .A,.,. J3Q i0.erXtiA1. . .. .. .. . . .. .. . .. . Agriculture . .. . . .. . . ... . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. ... . . . . .. ... . . . . . 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept .P.ond and surrounding land in westerly portion . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land ( (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . . .Does. .no.t- .appl-y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 13. Water mains will, be laid by . Greenport. Water Supply and (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . ..LILCO . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . and 6Vk (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by .LILCO, ..Uf. any).. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and (x) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots shoving all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $2 6,9,,E 1,5,. as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at three.. (33 . years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". 87 DATE .`.. . . ..2 5 .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . 19. . . . . . . . . . . . . (Name of Applicant) FRANCIS D. O' LEY =PATRICIA O'MALLEY 240 Secatogue Lane -West. -Is-1 ip, . ,Neva•York• •11.79.5 . . . . . (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF .SUFF.OLK. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. ss: On the . . . . . .2.5th ., , day of. ..ApriI. .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .1 19. 87. ., before me personally came O'MAL-LEY FI�AWZS.D... .Q'MALLEY. rm- d.PATETC.IA7.. . : to' ine known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . . :they.. . . . executed the same. Notary Public SHEILA C. RMALIATA NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. 52-4663234, Suffolk County STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ss:Term Expires, March 30, 199,(, On the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . day . . . .. . . .. . . . of . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19. . . .. .. before me personally came . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that . . . . . . . . . . . . resides at No. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . is the . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . of . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that . .. . . . . . . . . . knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. ;tnrl tli;it . . . . . . . . . . . . signed . .. . . . . ... . .. . name thereto by like order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notary Public ' L S CHE ,E A April 30, 1987 Description of entire parcel of land shown on a map entitled, "Preliminary Subdivision Map prepared for Francis O'Malley at Southold, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York". Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot No. 39 as shown on a certain realty subdivision map entitled "Yennecott Park" filed in the office of the Clerk of Suffolk County under File No. 5187, which corner is South 140 04' 00" East 140.00 feet as measured along the westerly line of Laurel Avenue from the southerly line of Yennecott Drive, and ' running thence .from said point of beginning southerly along the westerly line of Laurel Avenue the following courses and distances: ( 1 ) South 140 01 ' 20" East 994.86 feet, (2) South 120 45' 40" East 759.22 feet, (3) South 90 33' 00" East 6.06 feet to the land of the Long Island Rail Road; thence South 700 52' 00" West along the land of the Long Island Rail Road 808.25 feet to the land now or formerly of Edwin Mooney; thence northerly and westerly along the land of now or formerly of Edwin Mooney, along the land .of now or formerly of Patricia Ann Mooney and again along the land of now or formerly of Edwin Mooney the following courses and distances: ( 1 ) North 230 30' 40" West 879.54 feet, (2) South 580 03' 00" West 167.82 feet to the land now or formerly of Herbert R. Mandel ; thence northerly and westerly along the land of now or formerly of Herbert R. Mandel and again northerly along the lands of now or formerly of Herbert R. Mandel and of now or formerly of Richard H. Wheeler and Laureen E. Wheeler the following courses and distances: (1 ) North 230 29' 30" West 259.06 feet, (2) South 880 57' 30" West 572.83 feet, (3) North 2° 33' 40" West 492.56 feet to the southeast corner of Lot No. 47 as shown on aforesaid map entitled, "Yennecott Park"; thence northerly, easterly, again northerly and again easterly along the boundary lines of aforesaid map entitled, "Yennecott Park" the following courses and distances: ( 1 ) North 00 41 ' 50" East 183.53 feet, (2) North 830 42' 00" East 1123.63 feet, (3) North 90 30' 40" West 192.50 feet, (4) North 840 38' 30" East 459.86 feet to the point or place of beginning. I 1 y _ EUDLE D Standard N.Y.B.T.U. Form 8002-20M —Bargain ano sate Deed,with Covenants against Grantor's Acts—individual or COrpotation. (single sheet) CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURE, made the day of , nineteen hundred and eighty BETWEEN FRANCIS D. O'MALLEY and PATRICIA O'MALLEY, both residing at 240 Secatogue Lane, West Islip, New York party of the first part,and party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State o� New York, known and designated as Lot on a certain map entitled, "Map of Bayberry Estates " and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on , 198 as Map No. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE part of the premises conveyed to the parties of the first part by deed of dated and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk 's Office in Liber at page on DISTRICT 1000 SECTION BLOCK LOT TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the: right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: FRANCIS D. O'MALLEY PATRICIA O'MALLEY STATE OF NEW YOftK, COUNTY OF SS: STATE OF NOW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 , before me On the day of 19 , before me personally came personally came to lice known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. executed the same. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 , before me On the day of 19 , before me personally came personally came to ine known, who, being by me duly sworn, (lid depose and the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with sav that he resides at No. whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that Ise is the of that he'knows the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he to be the individual knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw affixed by order of the board of directors' of said corpora- execute the same; and that he, said witness, tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. i8ttrgttin ttnb Jf�ttir Verb WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS SECTION 'rTLE NO. BLOCK LOT TO COUNTY OR TOWN Recorded at Request of CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY STANDARD FORM OF NEW YORK BOARD OF TITLE UNDERWRITERS Return by Mail to Distributed by C19ICAG0 'I'I'I`L]c INMUItANCE COMPANY Zip No. W U U. LL 0 _Z 0 OC O U W OC LL O W N O lL lL U d Ln _N H W Wuj uj ui , �c ti APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: - 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be • .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. . . . . ... .. . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . .. .. .. ... . . ... . . . .. . . . . . . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber . 765.5. . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . Page . .A4A . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . On . . June 13.,•. 1,974 Liber . .7.19.5.. .. .. .... .... ... Page . . .01.. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . On . . J.uly. 11 1972 . Liber . :U9.4.. . . .. . ... .. .. .. . Page . . .5 9.7. .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . On Liber . .. . . .. .. . . .:.... .. .. . . . Page . .. .. ... . . . .. .. . . .. .. . On Liber . .... .. .. .. .. .......... . Page . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. ... On . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. .... .. . . .. .. .. .. . . . . ... . oras distributee . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. ... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . ..... . . . ... .. .. . 5. The area of the land is . .. .5.0 .. .. . . . . .. . acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except . . . none.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. The land is encumbered by . . .PP. . . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . mortgage (s) mxMux§d X (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . in original amount of $. . . . . .. .. . . .. . unpaid amount $ . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held by . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . address . .. .. .... .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . .. . . Page . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . in original amount of . . . .. . . . . . . . . . unpaid amount $. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . held by . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . address . . . .. .. . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . in original amount of . .. . . . . .. . . . . . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . held by . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .... .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. . address . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. ... .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except electric. .. .. . . .. .. . agreement recorded in Liber .132 4 at. .Paqe:. .�7A. .. .. .. . . . .. ... ... . . . .... . . . . 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts A. Residential.. . . .. .. .. . . .. .. . .. . . .Agriculture .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . . .. ... . .. . . 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept land. An. westerly portion. . . ... . ... . . . . . . . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (duel (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . . . . .D o.Q n.Q t. .ap.p l.y. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . 13. Water mains will be laid by . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . and;� (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . LILCO.. . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . ... . .. .. . . . . .. . I . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . and (a.* (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by J?T.WQ ..Uf- .any,),, , , . • .• and (v) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. Z� 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. Z71 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at 'the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots sho-,ving all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $2 69,?1.$.. , as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . three. . .(a) years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE . .. April .2.5.. .. .. .. .. .. . . 19. . .8.7 'l -�` . . . . . ..����. . (Name of Applicant)FRANCIS D. O ' ALLEY _ . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. ' � TATRICIA "0-'MALLEY I 240 Secatogue Lane (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF .SUFFOLK. . .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. ss: On the . . . 5.tb. . . . . .. .. . day of. . . Apr i,l,, ,, , , , , , , , , , ,, , , ,, 19.$ . ., before me personally came O'Malley Francis D. O'Malley and Patricia. / , . . , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . .tbe-. . . .. . executed the same. Notary Public SHEILA C. RETTAL1ATA NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. 52-4663234, Suffolk County Term Expires, March 30, 19 f,8 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . ss: On the . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . day . . . . . . . .. . . . of 19. .. .. .. before me personally came . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that . . . .. . . . . .. . resides at No. . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . is the . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . of . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that . .. . . . . . . .. . knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. tLnd tli:tt . . . . . . . . . . . . signed . .. . . . . .. . . .. . name thereto by like order. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . Notary Public HEDULE E YvuNG 0& YOUNG 400 OSTRaANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK zzgoz 516-727-2303 aALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG Poo6sionat Engineer 9f Land Sucveyoa Land. Surveyor April 30, 1987 FRANCIS O'MALLEY (Realty subdivision) Laurel Avenue Southold, New York ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION UNIT PRICE ESTIMATE 1 . Road Excavation, Final Grade and Subgrade Construction 7000 CY $ 2.50/CY $ 17,000.00 2. Roadway Pavement 5900 SY $ 9.00/SY $ 53,100.00 3. Curbing 3850 LF $ 6.50/LF $ 24,830.00 4. Drainage Pipe 18" Diam. 1351 LF $ 20.00/LF $ 27 020.00 24" Diam. 250 LF 25.00/LF 6.250.00 5. Drainage Structures a. Manholes -- -- -- b. Catch Basins --s6 w 117.00/VF $ 5,850.00 c. Concrete Walls 2 1500.00 EA 3,000.00 d. Leaching Basins --f2,040—.0 e. Special Structures (Grit Chambers) 2 $ 1200.00/EA $ 2,400.00 6. Recharge Basins (Ponding Area) 6000 CY $ 2.50/CY $ 15,000.00 7. Screen Planting 100 $ 25.00/EA $ 2,500.00 8. Street Trees 31 $ 125.00/EA $ 3,825.00 9. Topsoil & Seeding a. Roadway Shoulder areas 4300 SY $ 2.00/SY $ 8,600.00 b. Ponding area slopes 530—`Y $2.Y , 10. Traffic Signs 6 $ 100.00/EA $ 600.00 11 . Concrete Monuments 22 $ 50.00/EA $ 1 , 100.00 12: Telephone & Electric 1900 LF $ 20.00/LF $ 38,000.00 . 13. Water Main 1900 LF $ 25.00/LF $ 47,500.00 TOTAL $269,215.00 1HEDULE E ' YOUNG o& YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK I19oi 516-727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG Poofeeeional Engirtmv 4F Land Sacveyoo Land. Suv"yoc April 30, 1987 FRANCIS O'MALLEY (Realty subdivision) Laurel Avenue Southold, New York ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION UNIT PRICE ESTIMATE 1 . Road Excavation, Final Grade and Subgrade Construction 7000 CY $ 2.50/CY $ 17,000.00 2. Roadway Pavement 5900 SY $ 9.00/SY $ 53,100.00 3. Curbing 3850 LF $ 6.50/LF $ 24,830.00 4. Drainage Pipe 18" Diam. 1351 LF $ 20.00/LF $ 27 020.00 24" Diam. 250 LF 25.00/LF 6,250.00 5. Drainage Structures a. Manholes -- -- -- b. Catch Basins 50 VF 117.00/VF $ 5,850.00 c.. Concrete Walls 2 1500.00 EA 3,000.00 d. Leaching Basins 12VF ---170.001VF2,040. e. Special Structures (Grit Chambers) 2 $ 1200.00/EA $ 2,400.00 6. Recharge Basins (Ponding Area) 6000 CY $ 2.50/CY $ 15,000.00 7. Screen Planting 100 $ 25.00/EA $ 2,500.00 8. Street Trees 31 $ 125.00/EA $ 3,825.00 9. Topsoil & Seeding a. Roadway Shoulder areas 4300 SY $ 2.00/SY $ 8,600.00 b. Ponding area slopes 5360F $ 2.0015V $ 10,600. 10. Traffic Signs 6 $ 100.00/EA $ 600.00 11 . Concrete Monuments 22 $ 50.00/EA $ 1 ,100.00 12. Telephone & Electric 1900 LF $ 20.00/LF $ 38,000.00 13. Water Main 1900 LF $ 25.00/LF $ 47,500.00 TOTAL $269;215.00 S CH] LE A April 30, 1987 Description of entire parcel of land shown on a map entitled, "Preliminary Subdivision Map prepared for Francis O'Malley at Southold, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York". Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot No. 39 as shown on a certain realty subdivision map entitled "Yennecott Park" filed in the office of the Clerk of Suffolk County under File No. 5187, which corner is South 140 04' 00" East 140.00 feet as measured along the westerly line of Laurel Avenue from the southerly line of Yennecott Drive, and running thence from said point of beginning southerly along the westerly line of Laurel Avenue the following courses and distances: ( 1 ) South 140 01 ' 20" East 994.86 feet, (2) South 120 45' 40" East 759.22 feet, (3) South 90 33' 00" East 6.06 feet to the land of the Long Island Rail Road; thence South 700 52' 00" West along the land of the Long Island Rail Road 808.25 feet to the land now or formerly of Edwin Mooney; thence northerly and westerly along the land of now or formerly of Edwin Mooney, along the land of now or formerly of Patricia Ann Mooney and again along the land of now or formerly of Edwin Mooney the following courses and distances: ( 1 ) North 231 30' 40" West 879.54 feet, (2) South 580 03' 00" West 167.82 feet to the land now or formerly of Herbert R. Mandel ; thence northerly and westerly along the land of now or formerly of Herbert R. Mandel and again northerly along the lands of now or formerly of Herbert R. Mandel and of now or formerly of Richard H. Wheeler and Laureen E. Wheeler the following courses and distances: (1) North 230 29' 30" West 259.06 feet, (2) South 881 57' 30" West 572.83 feet, (3) North 20 '33' 40" West 492.56 feet to the southeast corner of Lot No. 47 as shown on aforesaid map entitled, "Yennecott Park"; thence northerly, easterly, again northerly and again easterly along the boundary lines of aforesaid map entitled, "Yennecott Park" the following courses and distances: ( 1 ) North 0° 41 ' 50" East 183.53 feet, (2) North 83' 42' 00" East 1123.63 feet, (3) North 90 30' 40" West 192.50 feet, (4) North 84' 38' 30" East 459.86 feet to the point or place of beginning. [EUDLE D Standard N.Y.B.T.U. Form 8002-20M —Bargain and sale Deed,with Covenants against Grantor's Acts—Individual or Corpurntion. (single sheet) CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURE, made the day of , nineteen hundred and egty� BETWEEN FRANCIS D. O'MALLEY and PATRICIA O'MALLEY, both residing at 240 Secatogue Lane, West Islip, New York party of the first part,and party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated as Lot on a certain map entitled, "Map of Bayberry Estates " and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on 198 as Map .No. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE part of the premises conveyed to the parties of the first part by deed of dated and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk 's Office in Liber at page on DISTRICT 1000 SECTION BLOCK LOT TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the salve first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture 5o requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: FRANC.IS D. O'MALLEY PATRICIA O'MALLEY STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 , before me On the day of 19 , before me personally came personally came to me known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. executed the same. 'STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 before me On the day of 19 , before me personally came personally came to Ine known, who; being by me duly sworn, did depose and the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with say that he resides at No. whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he is the of that he'knows the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he to be the individual knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw affixed by order of the board of directors' of said corpora- execute the same; and that he, said witness, tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. Bargain nub J�aIr Drrd WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS SECTION TITLE NO. BLOCK LOT COUNTY OR TOWN TO Recorded at Request of CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY STANDARD FORM OF NEW YORK BOARD OF TITLE UNDERWRITERS Return by Mail to Distributed by CHIC/AGO TITLE INSURANCE COIMPANY Zip No. W U U. LL 0 (D _Z OC O U W OC LL O W N OC O LL W U d W Uj H JUL 2 YOUNG 4& YOUNG 400 08TRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK n9or 516-727--2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG Professional Engineer 4f Land. Surveyor Imo, mayor July 18, 1986 Planning Board Town of Southold Suffolk County Southold, New York, 11971 Re: FRANCIS W MALLEY (85-1482-F) Dear Members of the Board: Enclosed herewith are six (6) prints of the Cluster Subdivision Sketch Plan. This plan .has been amended in accordance with your resolution dated June 11 , 1986 to relocate the access road to this development. Based on the resolution we are proceeding with the Preliminary Subdivision Map. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young HW /jet Enc . cc: Mr. Donald A. Rettaliata L f Y) / } DONALD A. RIETTALIATA ,Ato%ney and doun1Elos at 2aw 285 WEST MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 493 ^ SAYVILLE, N.Y. 11782 MAY 1987 516-589-2500 B6"66 E�16J May 8, 1987 Ms . Diane M. Schultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 Re: Map of Bayberry Estates Dear Ms . Schultze: Enclosed please find the following items all as to the application of Francis D. O'Malley and Patricia O-'Malley for approval of the above plat. The papers enclosed are as follows : 1. Application in duplicate for approval of plat with annexed schedules : 2. Long Environmental Assessment form 3. My escrow check payable to the Southold Town Clerk in the amount of $6,000 representing filing fee 4. 12 copies of the preliminary subdivision map If the enclosed meet yQixr. needs, please schedule this matter for a Planning Board hearing and contact me as to the date and any notification requirements to be done on my part. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very trullyyA yours, DONALD A. RETTALIATA DAR:ms Enclosures APPENDIX A EAF ;R ENYIRO;1MENIAL ASSESSMENT - Proiect Information NOTICE: This document +, desiened to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the anvirciv*"t. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered as Dart of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete PARTS 2 and 3. It is expected that c011010tion of the EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not Involve new studies. research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavalkble,.- so indicate and specify each instance. YAME OF PROJECT: NAME AMC ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different) ' Francis O'Malley Laurel Avenue, Southold, New York ADDRESS AND NAME OF APPLICANT: (Street) Francis O'Malley c/o Donald Rettaliata�l tote D .- am. Esq. Bustl= PHONE: 589-2500 285 West Main Street (Street) Sayville, New York 11782 " . Cate D DESCRIPT104 OF PROJECT: (Briefly describe type of project or action) Realty Subdivision ' u (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH Q1IESTION - Indiate M.A. if not applicable) A. SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall project, both develoned and undeveloped areas) 1.• 6o"] character of the land: Unerally uniform slope Generally uneven and roitinv or-irregular 2. Present land use: Urban Industrial i . Comhercial . Suburban X _. Rural Agriculture ,�ttier 3. Total acreage of oroject area: 50 acres. Approximate acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After Completion Meadow or Brushland 39 acres 27.lacres Hater Surface Area 0 acres O.,._ac-ss Forested 3 acres 3 acres Unvegetated (rock, earth or fill) _0_Acres Agricultural 0 acres 0 acres Reads. buildinc3 •'-' Hetland (Freshwater or and other paved Tidal As oer Articles 8 8 z_ surfaces acres ,,Lacres :a, 125 or F.C.L.) __acres acres 0 acres 9. 1 acres Lawns Other (indicate Lyme) 4. '+hat is redominant soil twe(s) an oroiect site? Haven Loam --_-_— S. a tre tnerp ''arocx outcro-joinas on m ipct sit!? Yes _X_9c "mat is �eoth to bedrock? N/A ----Yes •eet) R. Approximate percentage of proposed oroject site with slooes: 0-10S 1007.. 10-1Sf S; 1S3 or greater Z. 7. Is project contigual to. or contain a buildinn or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? Yes No S. what is the depth to the water table?20-30feet pl 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes No 10. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered - Yes X 3o, according to - Identify each species us, 11. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs. dunes. other geologicil ;t•_:. ' . formations - Yes X No. (Describe 1 12. Is the project site resently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area Yes No. 13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community! " Yes A No 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: . None a. Na of stream, and name of river to which it is tributary N/A Nam iS. Lakes. Ponds. V.atland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Nave N/A ; b. Size Oft acres) N/A �... , 18. what is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential. R-2) and the scale of developmient (e.g. 2 story). B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 50 acres. b. Project acreage developed: 0 acres initially; 11 .9acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped d. Langth of project. in miles: N/A If appropriate) a. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot -(' ' age N/A developed acreage N/A f. Number of off-stre't parking spaces existing 0 proposed = 40 g. Maximae.vehicular trios generated per hour 2.5 (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: 7ne Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial X Ultimate X i. If: Orientation `L ''.eighbornood-City-Regional Estimated Enioloyment Come rci a l Industrial J. Total heignt of tallest mronosed structure ____feet. 2. Now much natural material (i.e. rock, earth. etc.) will be removed from the site �' "tons;: R:':'" cubic yeads.,' 3. Now many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs. ground covers) will be removed fror site 2$acres.=='.,- 4. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by,th�s project? X Yes No S. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? ,L_Yes 'a 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months. (including demolition). 7.• If multi-phased project: a. Total number of phases anticipatWN/A No. b. Anti einoted date of co,nmeneem+ent phisi 'Fa. 11 mtortti 1 987vear (includihy demolition) C. Approximate.completion date final has, Fal 1 mnnth1990 year. d. Is phase i financially dependent on subseauent phases? YeS' '•%+'lye"`"N/A S. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes X No 9. Number of jobs generated: during.construction after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. W11 project require relocation of any projects or facilities? _' Yes. _�Na. If yes. explain,: 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? X Yes b. If3res. indicate type of waste (sewage.; industrial. etc.) Sewage. c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will N. discharged NSA 13. Will surface area of existing lakesX ponds.'strows. bays or other surface waten:ays be.increased decreased by proposal? • Yes No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? Yes .No. 13. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? _Yes No b. If yes. will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? " X Yes No C. If yes. give name: T/0 Southold ; location Cutchogue d. ►Jill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? X Yes Ko Lawns 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? _ its Y_No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes _X_Ne ••'';. 19. 4411 project result in an increase in energy use? _X Yes !10. If yes. indicate types) 20. If water sucoiy is from wells indicate oumoing.capacity N/A gals/minute. 21, iotal anticipated water usage per day 6000 gals/day. 22. Zoning: a. What is dominant Zoning classification of site? A - Res i dent ial/Acricult'Ur2L b. current soecific zoning classification of site A - Re5i dent laI /Agri-riiiItIn cap_ c. ?s or000sed use consistent Frith present zoninq? Yes d. If no, indicate desired tonino _NLA____•__ __•_ ____ - 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? _ Yes X No c. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Approval (Yes. No) (Type) (Date) (Gate) City. Town, Village E?S Board ,City. Town, Village planning Board �V1S�.LU City. Torn. Zoning Board ; City. County Health Department other local agencies g COMM Other regional agencies — State Agencies Federal Agencies i C. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If than are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal. please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to miitigate or avoid th PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: TITLE: REPRESENTING: �7 4 e-- O DATE: E . J w f 1�. EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART II Project Impacts and Their Magnitude General Inf+r gation tRi-c Carefully) - In completing tm form the reviewer should be guided by the question: have my decisions and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. - Identifying that ar: effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessi"rily si ificant. Any large effect must be.evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance.• By identifying' an effectcolumn 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. - The Example! provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds• may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project. on each site, in each locality. will very. Therefore. the examples have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examples per question does not Indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) . a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART,2. Answer Yes if there will be effect. b. Maw answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the appropriate box (column 'l or 2) to indicate the \potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column„2.s If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact taen consider the impact as potentially IargilAd proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than ,large magnitude. plane a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates- that such a reduction is not possi6l�: SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN._IMPACT`BE . MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON LAND NO YES WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS .A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHARGE TO O O ..,, PROJECT SITE? Examples that would Aool; to Column 2 _ Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise ner 100 foot of lenatn.), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 101. Construction on Lana where the death to the water table is less than 3 feet. construction of paved oarkino area Fmr 1.'1! or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exoased or generally witiin 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction tna' will continue for more than 1 Year or invoive more than ore ase or stage. Excavation for :mining aurposes that would remove rare than 1,000 tons cf natural material (i.e. rock or sail) per Year. Construction of anv new sanitary landfill. "DLL Tn POTENTIAL CAN i"PACT BE OERATE LARGE REDUCE? BY !SPA T IMPACT DROJECT CPAHGE Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: YES 2. WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE 9R UNUSUAL LAND FnRHS ^ FOUND ON THE SITE? (i.e. eliffo. dunes, eeolooical forme- dons. eta} Snecific land forms: INPACT� CH WATER 3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATEP. BODY MI YES - OESISNATr'D AS •', ...,' - ...........0 PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, 24. 25 of the Envir- onmental Conservation Law, E.C.L.) Examoles that 'Would Apply to Column 2 Dredging more than 109 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland.' . Other impacts: a. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY NON-PROTECTED EXISTINA OR NEa NO YES + BCOYOF HATc'Rt ............................................0 O Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 A 101 increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. _,_�ConstruetloT�4 a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of 1 `` surface area. --- -- Other impacts: 5. '4iLL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR ra0UND4AT-eR n1lA v YES � LITY. O Exat"oI es that would Aopiy to Column 2 Pm;ect will require a discharge permit. ' F Project recuires use of a seur_e of water that does not nave ADprovai to serve 2rvoosed project. �ro;ect reduires water supply from wells with nreater :man '5 7allons atr minute oumaing capacity. - y C-nstruction ir operation Causing any contamination of a Duolic water supply system. - Project will aaversely affect groundwater. " L,cu,a eflluent rill .e conveyed off the site to fac-11Lies wnien presently jo not exist or have -- inade_uate capacity. .:ec: recuiring a *aci;ity that woula ne -,mrF?- in ±xcess 24 . ,^00 ,alloys per ca.. _ - ''se r cause siltation :r :t^ems e!sc:!are an extst!r1g, �Y'y Tf 'water to -.e ex:en: •na: :nere i +�•• :e an .:717us vFs ai contras: '+a turn .7ne!t'2ns. - i ' 1 't d jf WILL TC POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE DEBATE LARGE REDUCED Cr IMPACT PROJECT CHARGE 6. UILL PROJECT ALTER DRAINIIRF F1.71. PATTEMM OR SURFACE HATER *0 YES RUNOFF? .....................:............................. 00 Example that 'could Amply to Colurn 2 Project would imiede flood water flaws. �. Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. a� Other im eacts: (f9A® ila YES 7. UILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR OUALITY?..........................0 F.xaoles that Would Apply to Column 2., Project will induce i.01M or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Project will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse Per' hour. Project emission rate of ail contwomants will exeaed S lbs. oar hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's pee hour. Other imioaets• I ACT OK PUM AM ANIISAL ! yo YES a. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR EXCANMED SPECIES? O Examples that WoulA Apoly to Column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site, over or near site or found an the site. Removal of env portion of a critical or sianificant wild- - I i fe hnbi UL _ AosM cation of Pesticide or herbicide over more than .6. �- trics a year other ttan for a3wvultural purposes. ntti�r 1r.oacts: �� 9. MLL PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECT NON-THREATENED OR NO YES „ ENDAMARED SPECIES? ........................................ Examole that 'Would Apply to Column2 0 O _ rroject would substantially interfere witn'anv resident or migratory fish or wildlife species. Project requires the removal Of rore than In acres of mature ferest (over ion years in ant) pr other locally important vegetation. .7. 5 �l PALL Tn °CTEi Cl4i G"PACT,lE DERATE . LARGE REDUCED ftY 1 IMPACT I'raCT �RnJECT C1466r y, I"^ACT C IS:"iL RES^:'ACE 1?.. DILL THE 0VnJF.CT ;FQC7 vIEliS. VISTAS ^.3 T'.lF vr5h4L M^ YES S, 4 CNA4ACTEA OF THE IJF.IC,HBrlR!+�??0 OP, CO"'"IITY? .............. O 0 xamnles that Mould Apply t0 Column 2 rE; An incompatible visual affect caused by the introAuction Of new materials. colors and/or forms in contrast to the surroundine landscape. ._ A project easily visible. not easily screened,that is obviously different from nthers around it. 4 Project will result in the elimHnation or major screening of scenic views or vistas known to be important to the area. s. Other impacts: h L IMPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCE! 11. WILL PROJECT IMPACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC. No YES PRE-HISTnOIC OR PALEONTOrICaL IPMPTANCE? .................^ + , Examples that ,Mold Aooiy to Column 2 (V}(0, PrOject occurine wholly or partially within or contiguous to any facility or sitt listed an the National Resister of historic places. Any impact to an archeological site or fossil bqd located' within the project site. . Other impacts: 7 IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE 3 RE CAEATTON # 12. WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE OUANTITY OR OUALITY OF EXISTING NO YES r OR FUTURE.OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES?...... 00 s Examl#S that Would Aoply to Colusn 2 W 7.4 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. �• A major reduction of an open space important to the coaamnity. Other Impacts: r roa C,T n I H TA,ANSP7RTATiOY 13. PILL THERE 3E AN EFFECT TO EXISTING TRANSPORTATION NO YES SYSTEMS? ! Examoles that Would Anniv to Column 2 00 Alteration of present patterns of nOver+ent of people i and/or goods. �. Pro.lect will result io severe traffic -iroolems, z� 1 - L A Other iRnacts: •A• i 4 i, SMALL TO POTE'VTIAI. CAN I"ACT cE MODERATE LA°GE I REDUCED BY ; IMPACT. I'!PACT .. PROJECT:;CNANGE IMPACT ON E'(ERGY 14. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMINITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO YES ENEMYSUPPLY? ...........................................0 O Examples that Would Apply.to Column 2 + Project ausing greater than 5% increase in any form of energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences. Other impacts: ate 4��� IMPACT ON NOISE 15. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE DOORS. NOISE. GLARE. VIBRATION ND YES or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ....0/� Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 v ; Blasting within 1.500 feet of hospital, school or other sensitive facility. 44. '. -Tdors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). _ Project will Produce operating noise exceedina the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. _ Project will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. • _ Other impacts: IMPACT ON HEALTH 5 HATAROS ' NO YES 16. BILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY? ............. O Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 `J Project will cause a risk of exilosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides. chemicals, radiation. etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will be a chronic low level discharge or emission. _ Project that will result in' the burial of "hazardous wastes' .�. (i.e. toxic. poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., including wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid or contain gases.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallnns of.liauified natural gas or other liouids. Other impacts: a' y a k q lop !' LL iil 70TEi17 rl UK Z!i A OWTE LARGE REDUCED a !MPACT iMPACT P40JECT CHANGE I°PACT ON SROUTH AND CHARACTER OF CO!R9!NITY pa .'IElrjPgCPunnq 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHARACTE2 ^F THE EXISTING 40 YES CO`:!'.LNITY? ................................................0 0 Examole that Would Apoly to Cal-inn 2 _ The population of the City. Town or Village in which the project located.ls likely to grew by more than 5: of resident human population. . The municipal budgets for capitai expenditures or opera- Ling services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Will' involve any permanent facility of a man-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove nrime agricultural lands from cultivation. The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Oeveloonent will induce an influx of a particular age group with special needs. Project will set an important precedent for future projects. Project will relocate 15 or more emnloyees in one or more ry businesses. Other impacts: a .. NO YES 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PRr1JECT? .......0 0 Examoles'that Would Apply to Column 2 Either government or-citizens of adjacent communities have expressed apposition or- rejected the oroiect or have not been contacted. Objections to the nroject fr-om within the community. , IF ANY ACTION IN PART 2 IS IDENTIFIED AS A MTE7TIAL LARGE IMPACT OR IF YOU CANNOT DETERMINE THE MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLE,ED:FOR -.HIS'PROJECT. DETERMINATION PART I _4_ PART II PART 3 r Upon review of the information recorded an this EAF (Parts 1, 2 and 3) and considering both the maanitude and immartance of each impact, it is r'asonably determined that: PREPARE A ME.-ATIVS DECLARATION j ,ar• A. The project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, 0t. is one wnich may not cause significant samaee to the environment. 9. Althoudn :he oroject could have a sicnificant effect on the environment, :here will not be a significant effect in this'ease OR!PARE A YEr}T17E lE:LARAT. N because toe mitigation measures described in ?!= 3 have been 0 included as oart of the oracosed orojec:. - • C. The project will result in one or rare manor adverse impacts PREP:IRE ;OS:T:VE CECLARA TIOU ?ROCS-_. WI'H -"Is :hat cannot oe reduced and may cause significant damage to O :he environment. sit cma- re_ .e agency Sicnature i' 7-e^9rer ,i• - ffar!nt r-_:n resnons:31a of -- . r �r :e ^are 41 -ead cercv . .' ; 1, •.r APPME IT B SHORT ENVIRONMMTAL ASSESSMT FORM INSTR"CTIONSs (a) In order to answer the questions in this short W is is issumid that`thti' ' preparer will use currently available information concerning the project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not expected that additional studies, research '. .:;_. or other investigations will be undertaken. (b) If any question•has been answered Yes the project may be significant and , completed Envirronmental Assessment Form is necessary• - (c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that this project is not significant. (d) Environmental Assessment 1. Will project result in a large physical change to the project site or physically alter more than 10 acres of land? Yes No 2• Will there be a major change to any unique or unusual land form found on the site? -. • • . . Yes �� No 3• Will project alter or have a large effect on an existing body of water? e Yes No A 4. Will project have a potentially large impact an groundwater quality? . . . . . . . • . . . . Yes` N0 S. Will pro ject significantly-effect drainage flaw on adjacent sites? . . • Too No 6• Will project affect any threatened or endangered • plant or animal species? Yes No 7• .Will project result'in a major adverse effect an ` air quality? Yes :No 3* Will project have a major effect on visual char- . actor •of the community or scenic views or vistas - ldzown to be important to the community? • . • real Na 'S!• Will project adversely impact any site or struct..; ure of h storic, pre—historic, or paleontological e ' importance or any site designated as a critical ' environmental area by a local agency? 'Yes No 10. Will project have a major effect on existing or future recreational opportunities? . Yes No ^; 11. Will project result in major traffic problems or cause a major effect to existing transportation systems? . Yes No 12. Will project regularly cause objectionable odors, ;2 noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturb- ance as a result of the project's operation? Yes 13• Will pra�ect have any impact on public health or safety? 0 Yes No 1L. Will project affect the existing community by directly causing a growth in permanent pcpula— tion of more than 5 percent over a one—year period cr have a major negative effect on thech eraract of the community .r neisnborhmcd? . ''_'is vc 15. Is there public cencrovers7 concerning tre pro.4ec.? s o'er, PRVAPM'S SIGNATURE. - REPRE ENTING: JA':�. 9/L/78 EAF EiIVIR01MENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART III �FVAl�AT10Y OF THE l.IrnRTA9CE OF IMPACT V, ' INFORMATION ' - Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially large. ';.' ''' '-•t' = `' - The amount of writing necessary to answer Dart 3 may be determined by answering the Question: : In briefly completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient information to-inditate tile ;'. reasonableness of en► decisions? INSTRUCTIONS Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than large impact by.a.'pro ject change. 3. Based an the information available. decide 1f it is reasonable to conclude that this iwset is important. . to the minicipality (city. town or village) in which the project is located. To answer the question of importance. consider. - The probability of the impact or effect occurring - The duration of the impact or effect - Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources cr values - Whether the impact or effect can be controlled - The regional consequence of the impact or effect Its potential divergence from local needs and goals - Whether known objections to the prnject apply to this impact or effect. DETERMINATION OF SIGIIFICANCE An action is considered to be significant if: hne (or more) impact is determined to both large and 'Its (their) conseouenes. based an;the review+.= above. is important. PART III STATE'1MS (Continue on Attachments. as needed) Photographs which illustrate the general nature of the project area can assist the environmental analyst in his/her review. Submittal of photos is optional and not a required component of the initial EAF. Part II: Evaluation (Environmental Analyst) 1. Archaeological Concerns a.) Is the proposed action within a circle or square identified on the OPR.HP maps? yes no W. Is the area under review apparently undisturbed9 yes no (Please contact CRS for assistance in evaluating disturbance.) c.) Will the proposed action include a physical disturbance of the area? yes no d.) Is the slope in the area less than 15%?* yes no * Unless on limestone/flint escarpments. `If'tite'answer is yes to all of the preceding questions, refer to the Cultural Resource Section. 2. Structural Concerns :Will the project alter the physical character or sightline of any building or structure built prior to 1940 or listed on the State/National Register of Historic Places? If -"yes", refer to the Cultural Resource Section and provide photographs for each historic structure affected. Part M: Determination Refered to the Cultural Resource Section for review. No referral to the Cultural Resource Section. SHPA Review complete. Date Signature of Preparer DEC Permit Number DEC 3/85 Structural-Archaeological Assessment Form (Addendum to EAF) Applicant Name: Francis O"Malley Project Location: Laurel Avenue, Southold, New York Part I: ' " Project Information (Applicant) 1, ,Is project.continguous to, or contain a structure or archaeological site listed in the State/National Register of Historic Places? yes X no 2. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes; 0-10% 1 p0 9i6; 10-1595 916; 15% or greater 9�6. 3. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with the following drainage charac- teristies: well drained 80 moderately well drained 0 96; poorly drained - 20 %. (Use the Soil Survey classifications for your county). F4. Has, the land within the proposed project area. been previously disturbed/altered (excavated, mined, landscaped, filled, utilities installed)? yes no X If yes, briefly describe each. i there any buildings/structures built prior to 1940 and/or listed on the State Register of Historic Places within or adjacent to the proposed project area? yes no X If "yes", provide the following information for each building/structure (use attachments if needed): a.)• type of structure (eg. house, outbuilding, barn, bridge, dam tunnel), b.) location, c.) approximate age. P N I _D i ;,F, UbTd T LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 27, 1986 Mr. Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney at Law P.O. Box 493 Sayville, NY 11782 Re: O'Malley Subdivision Dear Mr. Rettaliata: Enclosed is an application to be filled out and returned for preliminary plat approval. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN UTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD L�"�m By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. P N D TO "1SO.0 LD TY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 11, 1986 Mr. Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney at Law P.O. Box 493 Sayville, NY 11782 Re: Francis and Patricia O'Malley Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday,June 9, 1986. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch map for the major subdivision of Francis and Patricia O'Malley located at Laurel Avenue, Southold for 20 lots on 50 acres in the cluster concept, survey dated as amended April 9 , 1.986 ,tax map no. 1000-55-6-35 &36 and 1000-56-1-1, subject to:. 1. Relocation of the access road Would you please refer to Sections A106-23 and A106-42 of the Town Code regarding the procedure and requirements for filing for preliminary approval. Please contact this office if you have any questions . Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Howard Young . YOUNG I& YOUNG 400 OSTRIANDER AVENUE RIVERHEsAD, NEW YORK zzgoz 616-72 7-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG Pvofesawnat ErtgLneev Tr Land Sarveyov Land S•soveyor May 29, 1986 Planning Board Town of Southold Suffolk County Southold, New York, 11971 Att: Bennette Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman Dear Mr. Orlowski , Enclosed herewith please find six (6) prints of Yield Map entitled STANDARD SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN prepared for FRANCIS O'MALLEY (85-1482-A) at Southold, Town of Southold, New York, for your use. Very truly yours, &mkv, Howard W. Young HWY/je Encs. cc: Mr. Donald A. Rettaliata +1 M P A )NING�BO'A D T ,S . LD S LG Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 22, 1986 Mr. Donald A. Rettaliata Attorneyat Law p.0. Box 493 Sayville, NY 11782 Re: Proposed subdivision for Patricia and Francis O'Malley Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board reviewed the above mentioned proposal at the regular meeting of May 19, 1986 . It was the consensus of the Board to request a yield map for this proposed subdivision. Would you please submit six (6) surveys of a yield map to our office. . Upon receipt of same, we will schedule this on the next available agenda. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, �Ce�w101t.L, Qydn� BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary P N1 ~ x TC10 O SOU LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 6 , 1986 Mr. Donald Rettaliata Attorney at Law P.O. Box 493 Sayville, NY 11782 Re: Francis O"Mally and Patricia 0' Malley Subdivision at Southold Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The above proposal was reviewed by the Planning Board at the Monday, May 5, 1986 meeting. It was the consensus of the Board to conduct a field .inspection prior to any recommendations or action. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, av-��.k or�W)ZL) 04� BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary APR 18 1996 DONALD A. RETTALIATA 'AtomnEy and dounaeffoa at taw 285 WEST MAIN STREET P.O.BOX 493 SAYVILLE.N.Y.11782 516-589-2500 April 18, 1986 Ms . Diane M. Schultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Tax Map Parcel Nos . 1000-055.00-06.00-036.000, 1000-056.00-01.00- 001.000 and 1000-055.00-06.00-035.000 Francis O'Malley and Patricia O'Malley, Owners Dear Ms. Schultze : Enclosed please find twelve (12) copies of the subdivision sketch plan prepared by Young and Young as to the proposed subdivision of the above entitled premises. Also enclosed is an affidavit of ownership executed by Francis O'Malley and Patricia O'Malley as to s.ai&.,premises . Please place this matter on the next Planning Board Agenda for their review;; and let me know date and time of the meeting. If you have any questions or further needs at this time, please con- tact me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, DONALD A. RETTALIATA -/ms Enclosures APR 1 STATE OF NEW YORK) ss . e COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) FRANCIS O'MALLEY and PATRICIA O'MALLEY., his wife, being duly sworn, depose and say': 1. They reside at .24.0 Secatogue .Lane, . west Islip, New York and are over the age of eighteen years . 2. They are the owners of premises - at Southold, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York known as Suffolk County Tax Map Parcels 1000-055.00-06.00-036.000, 1000-056.00-01.00- 001.000 and 1000-055.00,-06.00-035.000, the subject of this subdivision sketch plan review. 3 . They acquired title to Tax Map Parcel 1000-055.00-06.00-035.000 by deed of Joseph R. Kr.ukowski and Lillian Krukowski, his wife, dated t-he 28th day of June, 1972 and recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk on July 11, 1972 in Liber 7194 at page 597. 4. They- acquired title- to Tax Map Parcel 1000-055.00-06.00-036.000 by deed of Joseph Blados a/k/a Joseph Eladdis dated June 5, 1974 and recorded in the Office of the Suffolk. County Clerk on June 13 , 1974 in Liber'. 7655. at page 141. 5. They acquired title to Tax Map Parcel 1000-056.00-01.00-001.000 by deed of Stanley Poliwoda, Joseph W. Poliwoda and Alec Poliwoda dated June 28, 1972 and recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk on July 11, 1972 in Lihert 7195 at pace 01. 6. They make this af£idavilt knowing the. Town of Southold Plan- ning., Board will rely on the facts stated herein. 74 a,::r�. FRANCIS 0-MALLEY �7 PATRICIA WMALL]_,`' Swore to hip fore me t. i s 17th day of April, 1936. SHEILA t. RETTALIATA NOTARY PUBCK, State of New York No. 52 •4663234, Suffolk Cou ty Term Expires, March 30, 19W Y. U) '0;lt4$"VEY 46 A MtAWW'os 0 ?Z09,M Itt MAW YoRg$?,M 0e1CucArlciNLAW, 0 A- w wtvty M" gr*vna 4 OR L of 39 0_0% H;:T" co'cimw 0 tO A v-'.-irtu ccwy, Lot 4 0 59.6 6 8 o 8'Co"E 4 LONG- CREEK- 24.07 C` FCOTT qECorT ENN (D 3 4 0 0 6 t -c,> YEN, 0 04 �,` 27.80' 0 0 8 79' (PILo ENNECOTT R.File 5187 % iLA I n 1 10,I% rA 14 3-.4 0 10 (p - =.0- V YennecOtt Suff. Co Lot 41 r-A Sion ._ 1'- 27 .22- 0 Subdi Loj 43 Lot 42- 1 ____ 0 _)i ,IN 0 t.0 PO go Lot 44 25.60 It O 0-1� Z now or formerly Lot 45 CO rn v% c: Lot 46 It B.83- ennecOtt ParV' b 143 ?_000 0 t 0 .4 0 prope ty owners Asso 9 89, . playground It % park 2 too E CID N k 27. 18 0. 25.97' 1. 0 220 IS. 'NVI,_i-ore 4 10 1251121' ------26 to I % I 16 59 ------- -,27.05' 23.�2 . I I com Ic S N E 17.43 15.2*9* %* I,I, I I \ 22.56 O'tG I It It. 1 11 1, 25.21 ' V 17.56' 1 % 1, 11 \\\ II IZ30 I - 23.45 17.40- 19.45 co 1 0 23\00 17.60 16.39- 1. 19.78' 18.89 23.%Q ;�\4.33 Lot 47 - 0 U) 14i I % 20.7,9' 'o 0 16.78' '2P,.77- ."\ I I 1, 0 p e N C_*? p 1 0.61, 0 21 .52* e z t 19.94 22,74',' t '% __1 q5.70 18.98' ................................ 1 02 C\j I IN to 8* 0' "I %I t3 L 9 co 19.86' LOCATION MAP It now or formerly S", SCALE:I" =600' 16.77' 20.96 26.24',,' ISA H. Wheeler a 11 -o Richard 19.27� 2�5,03 Z i.64' IN ic-. 4 1 16.73' -9 41 ' It Laureen E. Wheeler 'N 0 T", 70' .�4 . C, TEST HOLE 16.62' It 1, 3 / %6- 27.89 O�A 01 .4 i LINE OF WETLANDS AS FLAG ED BY N.Y.S. DEC. Ito 8.01 , ,1,, 1 124.9' @ 30 Ito LOCATED 6/1/89 16.79' 1 261 86' 31 . 2� 2a.173 1 - '2NO.2 IN -3�0 6 6 F- 19.65 1 .7 "5 17.76 10 \ % 4, 30.48,' 1 34' .46' t 946_ 21 1 1 17.69* II P' 16.97 37 26. C;. 19.79' 1 IS.so e"t� t It 17.0 4' 1, it Vo 61 Fl I z I - _k* 2 .9 %I DC)O 6.59' 11 1.Its o cv. MP 0-0� OF tie) 0 50 I 4 6 co r-. ro 7 '23. 12l't 25.39 It SITE DATA : 3 S. �2520.20' %11* I� Qe I. TOTAL AREA = 50.0171 AC. 16.46. I I; A-: - th 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT 213 - 80 RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY 'A' 'T 0 Ptop_�5 v 0 ' 0Ir "' 3. TOTAL LENGTH OF ROAD = 1600 ± L.F. It \x 9. 1 0 10 6 Ito eo P -410 r. �4 4. TOTAL NO. OF LOTS 18 0 39' , . 5(, 19.85 91 0 0 5 OPEN SPACE AREA 32.8 AC. 572.83' ip. 0 t I V s.88057'50"W 2MO* . 1 1 ID 11 I` 2.8.7 IZ) 00 17. 16' 1 CA�- tjeo 19.791' '51A- 10 _T zj.d)l ------------------- 00 It -1" 1- 3/Ot 19.45- 1 7 0 k In '4 46 v ? I - 18.90. -2 21f I - 0 .1 3.NU'A 0 2�%.3 0 0 IV \.I- k9 6 20. 16 1. IL lu z - CO.r_ 4r 17 2 go 1 C_ 1 5 ID now % I I\ 2%�\62' 2 Mandel 20.94' QO* I -0- V 3 k .61 or former) HerbertR. S kv -j 0 z r A 2 I .P6 A,\ 24.05 0 ell 20.08- N ) a %D A S4 4i Z tv Ib 61 tD J> a)ry C).to 0 It Q _j A Q, SSD.6p 100 oit 94T kv DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 20.65 2 '2 3. I r-_ C.) rA 6 0 CAIC 0 A� BASINS: 4 DRAINAGE AREA: BASINS TO CONSIST OF PRECAST 44! BOX 10 79' T V= ARC 'N -0 4.3 :t A 6 9 5:eq A-- Tl3IBU`TARY AREA t 392500 SF WITH CONCRETE SLAB 8 CAST IRON FRAME a GRATE. 05' f R= E; RAINFALL = 0.5 FT. GRATES TO BE CAMPBELL FOUNDRY PATTERN I I A C =COEFF OF RUNOFF = 0.25 &F. NO 2617 OR EQUAL. k 1 2 67' q 4.r,A V =392500 S.F x 0.517T.x 0.25 = 490010 C.F MANHOLES TO BE CAMPBELL FOUNDRY PATTERN I 4M 2�4.6 S \33 NO. 1104A OR EQUAL. g 1 11 • VOLUME REQUIRED= 49000 C.F. 23.38' 6 NrTFST HOL a OC �/G ''2 N. TEST HOLE NO. TEST HOLE NO.11 TEST HOLE NO. TEST HOLE NO.13 % 1000 t VOLUME PROVIDED= 54000 C.F. J� it I% --NO. 4 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP TEST HOLE NO.S TEST HOLE NO.9 1 It It k %11 q 2. . Od EL.- O.O'EL.- aO' EL.- EL.- ao' EL.- I a 0 0 10:L- C�2.r- EL.- 0.0, 0.0, C, 2 G 281 TOPSOIL 24.9 TOPSOIL 242 TOPSOIL 230 TOPSOIL 20A TOPSOIL 20.9 TOPSOIL 0 5' P, Y, \1 .. I, I \ 1.0 1.0, 1.0, 211 v ID A LOAM 0 PREPARED FOR LOAM j 26.59' . I " LOAM a -2.6 LOAM 150 "0 c3 LOAM CLAY 2.5' 3.0' SAND 3.0, -1 0, V 20 25.37- 4.0' 0 NOTE P, CLAYEY , \.O,. >43, 23.24 I. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MA SANDS CLAY V�?O'&* C, - BA-,,Y, BERRY SIATES 27 DIST. 1000 SECT.055 BL. 06 LOT 035 a 036 SAND 0 SAND 8 SAND 8 0 ?_P, 21 .7t(; DIST 1000 SECT.056 BL.R_1 LOT 01 GRAVEL GRAVEL (j 71� C> -T ZELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO M.S.L. u AT SOUTHOLD co 1p, �*V V-v \V 0% 23. SAND a CLAY 2 <,v- ......... 24. 1 :"85.1.1 DATUM (N.G.V.D.- 1929). GRAVEL HIGHEST -A 11.0 11.0' PERCHED 00 c)D 25 .0 0 0 15-VA j-;5,it t5. SAND S WATER C51) 0 Ald' r I ::.\I . 23. 13' GRAVEL lb 2 - 9 12.0 12.0' @ % _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CLAY C4 OS to 1(9 OC) .,1 9 T U FZYARE�4,zj �2) Nt CLAY 16.0 CLAY 1 005. 4. 0' CLAY 14.0' 68, IT.0, IT.d 17.0'G/W 16.0, 1 11TO, It M_ 0_? 1 \t 0 33' SUFFOLK COUNTY, N . Y o .4 C5 all 0 to uo 19 0'. 'I C, It 6 2 0 TEST HOLE NO.1 TEST HOLE NO.2 TEST HOLE NO. 3 TEST HOLE NO.4 TESTHOLENO.5. TEST HOLE NO.6 TEST HOLE NO. 7 0. 1 21.70' EL.- - 0.0, EL.- 0.0 EL - 0.0, EL.-- EL.- 0.0 EL.- 0.0- EL� 0.0 P-3.09 285 22.4 TOPaR.IL/ '0' �O, TOPSOIL 19.9 TOPSOIL TOPSOIL L 20.8 0.5' A 8 LOAM Ek CLAY __§_ANDa I'D CLAY LOAM 0 (p Lo 2.0, \6)C;7 1.5' GRAVEL 2.0, HIGHEST 1.5, to le IV 0 .C) (D CLAY SANDY SAND/ I ro -- CLAY 7.d PERCHED -Y (3) 0 CLAY WATER 7 CLEAN LOAM 20. 9.0, CLAY Ott Ix 6.0' HIGHEST -,R) NA' 21 .SH CLAY CLAY It HIGHEST AND v\pv 7.0, PERCHED 7.0'PERCHED SAND a 0^ 20.40- ttfpl 0 C WATER WATER SAND 12.d G/W 190, CLAY P� -\u • CLAY GRAVEL 15� 1-3 17.0' 10.0, N, 0 OD G/W- 0PN pp AND CLAY NIOXA r�v 1(0 t�)",'O� CLAY _;5 _P�4 CLAY CLAY 39.d 0) 20. FEB. 18,1993 BOA0 HIGHEST ,JAN. 5,1993 32 0' 12.0' PERCHED �4 $ jcrt - �o "a' OCT. 2;�1992 GRAVEL FINE WATER NA0. eop�, CLEAN P�l DATE JAN. 6, 1992 y I-riz SANDSAND 8 SAND SCALE 1 100, 40 IVERHEAD, N.Y. \,A\ 17.0' 16.0' 17.0' 4 2.0' 36.0' 13.0, 17.0 NO. 85 -1482 ALD P E. a L.S. LIC. NO. 12 845 HOWA ...S. L.S. LIC. NO.45893 �0 S ��Ne 7"'1 SHEET I OF 2 :500:38 Z&.00 VC' :: o.B4 V G= AC =20. 4 AC,T= EXISTING 6RAPE + 0. �25 04 PR POSE G2A * S, 85 � L255 OF Ib eMP @ O.� O ° ° W 220 O-i— F 1 B CMP @ O. 00 Z Z10 OF IS GMP C� O.� O % C.B. O. 3 G.B. NO. I W T/C = Z , II � M. H. A� G.B. 0. 4 T/C = 27.91 1.E. = 2 2. 8e Q Q B. NO. ,v /0= 23,E I . E .= ►9.Z4 T/C = 7.91 - I.E. = 20. 83 I.E. = 0.5e. W aC.B. NO. 7 T/C = Z3.18 I.E.= 17. 13 Q 45 O 18 CMP @ .1.00 '/° G.B. T G = 20.4� t,E. = l 7.(05 0 Q T/C = 2 .i I Z I.E. = I Co .Co3 L P. 20. 54 Q 45 OF 18 CMP 0.(d O /° 0 J W � 1.E. = 2 .310 Q H.ifI. = Z8.39 z E- c = 20 4�- a 7 — I- CL j j (p tP O > m 0 U) - t• �t .t m r 0 0 ro cN m N N r dJ cp cp 6J dJ �- tQ cA N ? t\l N N N N LD O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N 0 0 0 0 01 LD p O N 0 - Lo 0 to NO p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 r LD N O 0 r N 0 � 0 dJ Ir to In 0 0 0 mI m 0 to N 0 0 r- IP N 00 0 to 0 to 0 N m p + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 0 0 0 0 �' �` m m co 00 r r rr r 13 w LD to 't 0 01 In N N N - - 0 O p PROFILE ROAD "'14 SCA LIE HOR IZ. : 11" = 50' VE2T. il' 10 2:3.40 Z4. 84 30.70 27.8c) EK.I TINC� GRA E -_ EXI ING GRA E + O .1o00 0 PROPO ED GRADE Ppor SEP GRADE Q Q NO. 3 D h- T/c = 2 .91 p C.B NO. 5 I.E, = 2 . 83 O T/C 23.6,Z > 0 .B. No. 4 I.E. 17 .92 d Q c.T/C = ZT 91 F- (� I.E. Z_ C•8 No. G Q z Z T/C = 23.I B Z W �I I,Er. = 17.&5 W til p O N m _ r 0 0 N to d d d d 0 O 0 (0 0 p 0 N u) 0 N 0 v 0 0 Ul 0 Ln N 0 + + + + + + + + + + + 0 O O - - N N mm N N - I. PROFILE IZOAD "C It P20FIL_E GOAD E3 SCALE SCALE HORIZ . : 1"= 50' HORIZ. , I"= 50' VE2T". I' = 10' PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP Z° 4„ PREPARED FOR FINISHED 2= I � ASPHALT WEALING I SURFACE BAYBERRY ESTATES GRADE 50 n-O" AT SOUTHOLD it TOWN OF SOUTHOLD =N : a . SLOPE 1: 3MAX. '�4 " � - 4' c�owN ' =I/4� SLO PE 1 3 MAX. SUFFOLK COUNTY, N .Y. MOUNTABLE CURB 3000 P.S. 1 . CONC. I �• ° Q 2 8 DAYS I — o' o. C CLJ 12 5 E� •a •.a: UfZB 8„ I- '/Z" WEAPING C0L)Ie5E 2- '/Z." BINDER COUfZSE 4" COMPACTED 6A5E COU25E 3/4" C2U51-IED CONCRETE O2 8 STONE BLEND TYPICAL kOAD SECTION N.T.S. -TYPICAL MOUNTAOLE CURB DETAIL FEB. 18,1993 YOUNG & YOIXVG JAN. 511993 400 OSTRANDER AVE. RIVERHEAD N.Y. OCT. 22,1992 DATE: JAN. 6,1992 ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. P.E. a L.S. LIC. NO. 12845 SCALE : I"= 100' HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. LIC. NO. 45893 NO. : 85 - 1482 THOMAS C. WOLPERT, N.Y.S. P.E. LIC. NO. 61483 SHEET 0 OF 2 50038 8L�07 • •� " N3nO3S•An5 MO Sr+nila+,.,a r:. 1'Y'•r'.s.,.i,�':nY C 136Va34SNY41 ION 3" S331NVVVt,0 'N®lint 4154 DMON31 3141 110 SIWDISSY 3H1 Of p .9� -, / arw No311H o3lsn Noun111sra aNIaN3, « . �• 'td6•2� 3WV A�N3'JV 3VIN3WNa3AO'J 'ANVdWO3 33111 £685b'ON '011 'S'l 'S1lN `9Nt10Jl 'h1 (7LIVMOH 5b8ZI 'ON '011 'S'l �3 '3d 'S7l'N `JNf10Jl '. 301V Z8bl- 58 'ON i ` ` 001 = I 3-IVOS 9S'E2 / 381 01 DYN-19 SIH NO(WV 'B3aVd3ad SI WN OV3HN3AlM '3AV ii3 „ q* �� , * L (3AtlRS 3HI WORM aOd NOSa3d 3Hl Ol A3NC 1 6961 £Z "lO0 31V0 pl"s . .9 . L Nnn 11VHS N0333H 031VJI61dl S331NVaVn£ s .LF3'E2 i, b'02 N WOD 3na1 anvA V 39 01 R\.• . G \ o3a3aa � sHSmasMO no vs o aoiRnxns i \ DNRIV39 ION dVW A3AanS SIHI !0 SAIdOD ' . . . ✓ 'MV1 N011V�na3 ZI 'a ,ao8 A9 t2 �,- \ , 6L'Oa Ob 02 �O G 31VIS )MOA M3N 3H1 i0 60LL N01133S 'Al ~- --- j i _ -Z�i'' 'MRlnnv >t!1 rlhrle'71a Ike' n971lOMlnvw.. _ ' tt EZ G� dO NOuv101n V SI'MAMS SIHI Ol doto �\\d� ---- bo tE ; a G I to O .60'Ea 0� O I' 1 r c)q ' '1J' ` ` '�'i QOQ4g�r ' -' , N ` kiNnoo >noA.fins - • .EE ��y". o ti • a-1OH1nOS A0 NM01 • .Et 'E2 �, , .S2 t j O s 4 '` 60 000s .tio sz °a��y ' �d� a - `` at b2 d y � ' ' ' ' ' wniva Ez Ol O30N3U333H 38V SNOIIVA313'Z t d- 0HInOS id I� o .sL'ta 10 101 io "18 sso'133S 66611SI0 o ' O to a sso 10l eo•l8 %so 1O3S 000l '1S10 \\ 69•L2 .✓ �L dVW XVl AIM* HIOdeIf1S 'I S31V.LS3 MJ83e .XVe ' S G 310N r .LE'SZ ���\\ 4� L �\ S� 1 , I ' , ' 1 n r+ � •'-.6b'Ea `,\ \ tZ ri1C.i`447�',j -a9-.1vM,'m '�{\\1 .6S'9a OG� a1 CA /- .-........, -,"r"Eji'a`'i 1,'I•I(� ' N' to I �'CO :+ 000� �' T 6 b2 \, 1 1 %', Ste' Nb -ld H31] >IS NOISIniaBn - - }\ _ _ .eE Ea S I ti o� bE L't\�\�\ �"c + 0005 C ` `; •\ �2\\oz \\.\o`z \\ 99b2 zf \ 1 ;o a � .[s' z •s •' I \\\ � 'O ; N ; • 6� Y , 1 A _ ( I I 0 \0 90 b t0 , \ ' �l1 1 t b 2 N 9dd � N d O --- ----- - - - Se a - , , .\• . t Ez• � - , N o :6q ez - bs/52�'� bF S o N N ' 1 ` �.06 2 *O � O , ` 1 ' ••��� � Qom, �� y 1' ``', / ' A \ `� 00 \` \„• \ 11 911 t2 (Dom m .s6,\ t9: ..9 e\+�$ - IaPuoW 'd p9gJ9H AIJawJo} Jo Mou 0001 -0 ,�' Et % z `� oo .tit bs oz Ur LT 6T \ ' oti 6� /T, \ 2 z 9S'9t06.et FEE 2c— - p2 ' �OE L t .917'6t 1 I \v/ , , } I I .9t LT \ 0 81 L'e 2 I 1 , \ I tno + = b'3�Id 30b'dS N3d0 'S N �' 0 6'�� I / �� j N ,• .oetz S 2 ,st8'ZL5 11 - M 0� L5o88'S o r I , S9'6t 81 = S10� d0 ON �d101 >� r N c, � 000 �at '6 ;• .6E, , :�•� + 0091 = ad02� d0 H1JN3� �d101 •� 8 � •, d AiISN30 MO-1 -IdI1N3GI S38 08 - - 10l8iSi0 3sn JNINOZ - '� I .7Tk b ,s� � ' I ! 9 '9t II 21 7'OV ILIO'05 = V38V -Id101 'I •N � .pCa o"'/ • % 9 '` E ' \ � � � \ � ' • .02.02 V'ldd 311 S p 1 • sty 92\ :,ET 'Ea, `L' NdQ '�� L I '0\ bt ' tE l0 ,� \ I� S\ 65'9 1 \ ' 66 ' t7o,LT \ ` I s• 9 , I .LE``b4` L6'9t 09'9t 410 Vl* L .6L'6t , y l2to�- T •. BL*LT S9'6t ' TLE tE ,ba02, E\�2913 92 68/1/9 031VOO' !! `, , 6 ba `\ .to�a *030 'S'A'N 11803 'JVl3SV \ `. +' _0 �\ `,� SONVl13M JO 3NM � � , b' y0, 6E'L2 '`\` 1 \, `, S 9% ,gt p I ', 0'- ` , OL' L a9'9t i ' ' ' M ` �' a d _. - ____ . -.• ` ttl 9t _ _ - 0 tV Jaiaa M '3 ua o3 `\ - _ co S2 '. \\` �°1. EL'9t bs' b Z Ja as aJn �� p�t� N , . _ , s sr2-- �. -- - _ .b2'9a ', \` L2,'6t - ;• .96'Oa ' '. LL-9t I 4M 'H P'��4a�a 009- 1:3lVOS / _ \ AIJ8WJ0} JO MOu dVW NOI1VOOl lQ� 6t ' N', O , 99 6t 5� i� CJ d I l d -71 ' I , �' �'• ' 1 .20 t I .OL'S� N I'- ~� ` `. I . ' ' '' ,.bL, as ; m 7 I �\dr► I` I / � • I\ � `.\ \\b6'6t � ,�, �/J%I � /d X -/ � (. � \ � r — — I 1 , \ ' m 0. I 1 - .6L'02 1 `� ��` .Z. 2., 2L.9t W _ .6tC EE .69•9t .9L.6t ,6E'9t 'i `, ; m \ . \ \ '\ , .09'LT ,5�'£Z }7Z , \ ', \\ `,�. `� oLJ I .Sb'6t 1 .00, II \ \ I ONO N 3 N 17 `\ `` , \ ; \ \` ` \, Od \,da aNd�s\ r'` N 1�OI6r7`�W5Nl�bb�11 OIYM j 9�5'aa L:.% .6'2'st 9t '1r .Eb'Lt2 p9'I-I 0 E2 .6SI '9t a 50'L g TG \qN)O 71 I I 1 \\ I to -87.`- et 'L2 `I L6'S2 i N ' t \\• `\ \`\ \\ \\ \\ �C tom./✓` 3„oo17i 8 0�6n�1d 18 '1lDd 11 o� oy \I ', „6e'6t 11Pun }aadoJd ti •\ , \ s,lau�+0 5 go ~x N + 0009 Q r ;9 \\ 1£9 £Z t i 9t7 to-1 ossd�Jod 4to3auu"' 1', O 5t }01 I(taaw�o} Jo Mou .09 92 0-1, 17i7 a-� o a�'I� N N \, o. j2 .22'L2 �01 Zt7 �o, ooauua�l,- uasin►pgnS _ O _ 1•b a 1 .00 •}}nS ` 11�laod �� 0 N 3 W '210 1003NN3A I tC11 ,\` ,6L/9 `\\ t° d' 1..815 'o I.J 0 N o I , \ N- a Z d do \ i S '� +-Q O 0 •� i `• ` O o , ' p03NN3 J\ LO 172\\`\ 1 -�I- r33aa 98.69 0 t 40-1 • 0-0 69 to-1 \ 00. .%:r 0 0 N