Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-114.-3-1 1 i 9� 5 / '� TYRt /O-09' —if11 \ A ❑ a o �10 C / I •1J�� N / 0 / F - i / WOOD E G 4 t ` L_A N D OF B A K E R • N�1 A R E A \ —3A p IGRpv S -� Bgckcic KEY MAP C ----- I l SCALE 1' 600 ' I SANITARY LEACHINGIt ►� / P�k ---POOL ° S 5k �, Irrc°f z� NOT TO SCALE 1 j i )Co N. 65' (0.5' 40" E. 215.03' 5 i \pG) TREES ` \ w Gb I v Mp\ta LILCO R'eV)�P REc /� O / f �p /l /J -` -" -- - - �O Cl) �2 S 5 5 � -,_ 1 ZD r / F/ / / // p O R 'REEt"'�TRtE --- - - � -- — --- - - --\ / P` P{ '°m, I L� C" THE I , - .� GROUND WA TER MA NA GEMENT ZONE I V hr4 E LE P H I I ' , t 8.75 acres ' x 300 d./acre = 2625 d LL W 9 P• g.p. . TREE FR OFEI A4 TREE(APPnN� o \ ( . TREE Q o P T- �P „ , f l N G I A \ 1 f BOAT STORAGE BUILDING ( COVENANTS 1 O g.p.d. 0 / TREE I 0 TREE /IC SR7a \ I STORE, OFFICE 3790 sSECURITY I YxOFFICE = 227 . .d. 0.06 r •, p EXISTING RESTAURANT 55sealsx l0 9.p.s. 550 gp.d. c R a v r_ BAR 5 sealsx /0 g p.d, 50 g p.d. TREE TREE TREE TREE � P1}f � / _ TREE d t�JJ g•p• / r ''TREE / / )(3 4 9Qr) MIDDLE PMW^� T BOAT SLIPS 91 SllpS x l0 g.p.a. 910 g.p.d / R4MP7 i l / GZcf x ( ` 1 TR E COTTAGE j --c VlVk�1S `_ ` I\ TREE TREc 2/ S Pxst, & o .-1 �^ � 1737 g.p,d. FUEZ C� / TREE TREE 8d r2cceep co SECURITY / ' .. CON'riNc�o�No/ / •� TREE TREE ( •, g eao �e� FIR SLOG ' / / .A F?K I N CJ _` ` TREE' TREE ©TREE r TREE TREE ` YY ' �I / r— Ld U1 DESIGN RESTAURANT / lEBLrC l ,q[� OCJ\PUFAP �cvcGAS - _ \ t' -- - - - EM DRY NEU I oil"�j EXISTING 55 seals 30 v.s. 1650 d. C CePHOYF P TREE LAB , ' . r SIG N G R A ��� - RO A _ _ R FOR �G�-'j0' Ax'tea• g gP• 5 bar seals 30 s'. l50 d: Fc S COG \ '-:. UNDERIVKS .' ("� CECdk CFDA'R I --1.' .' - I IN J EMPLOYEE (' GAFE �_ uviTExorrounv �cr ,3 PHASE Q // ( 'STOgE.� Q TREE \ D FR 0 LOG 1 > LJ £1 F.CT'. GAS MAIV PARKING T",-' i. - I TIO 0' OI.JM i - - - - — - -- -— =— — — _ - E RES I R S O L Y o ' r � ' OFFICE J,+KING/ 11 NS. -'► ) to r " ADD N OF N FT N TREE �c� a - _ , - ______ __ �', UTILIZE THE EXISTING SAN ARY SYSTEM & �'� SHOP -- - L \ 200' Cued ADD 2 8'0 x 12 V.F. Deep leach,ng Pools ( overflow J / I TREE TREE Z� TREE/ GAS MET R / _ - }- I STORAGETREr DRY WELL .I > / \ TREE 1 - SrORAGE CON CONTAINE EhTSTWG Nr //� f L.O FOR BOAT •r O I ( J TR E F ., _ ROOF I I , \ RAGE CO _ ORAWAGE. - -- sro STORAGE 1 TREE CTT �- / 1 J I TREE / •\ _ �� RETAINING WALL - r B U I L D I N G N .. ` Q a i- - � •v - • I ( = i TREE FIN .FLR. ._ EL. 11.5 d-- Dry o ORYNF.! 0 N Lr) 3 MAP FOR DRY WELL O _ 200' -� LAEXI FOR i C� - 1 I 0 - [ ✓ "Z ' EMTNG _ - - . FOR o N N p I N N i 1 ^� !I `L P FAR .i - - 0 .�r C. `A _ , _ ROOF OR,✓VA6e: .� _ _ _ �� � a MATT A MAR MARINA , INC . \ l�� f EXISTI NG r GRAVEL AREA �` �IO2 SwnLE + G O ELfC7R1C Ore p R r h - _ ( S 0 A T PARKING ) 6 f/o 7- t�r ' - a _ / /�i� ? { a 2 11 T M A T T I TUC O 1 O \. - P�• --T -� _ ._'7` --.5';'T ----.--r-• _---,w_ - _ -. - - - L I LC O _ I3E2 M W90pf t, i ,3 PHASE_ UNE - 60000, 0000 _ rra��c it - 17-S S Q oPOP0 ob 60 • 00 0 UD OOOOO CC ¢ - CPr f�� W = TOWN OR SOUTHOLD b e r' �- • m : , ,/ _ o ,2 RM C,20SS�CT/d/V SUFFOL K COUN T Y , N Y Z _ i �� ----- - _ -_- FA THEN - - - . -� ~` 6 1000 1 14 0 3 01 r , - \DNS �_ �` ,�, � \ O SCALE I APPROXIMATE SHORELINE HIGH WATER Ml>aF:'K - 50 I / / PPM / P P J f •?� ^> - c2�,u; .. F' c. =r�-a T-c ._ �P /c' x'c'..t HEADWALL ' FEB. 22 , 1989 MAR . 21 , 1 9 8 9 i v't �LE�,� � � � � FEB. 6, 1992 (Sanitary Design 1 1 P"° � � p° � M A T T t T U C K C RE IE: K APPROVED BY 1992 00 K s NOTE: PLANNING BOARD (-- 1 / SITE PLAN INFORMATION FROM.FIELD, OFFICE G SITE PLAN BY STEVEN J. HYMAN, P.E., DATED DEC. 1986 '(OWRI OF SOUTHOLD � F ACTUAL FIELD DATA AND OFFICE INFORMATION. U JJId 2 2 1992 ' CONTOUR LINES AND ELEVATIONS TIONS ARE DATE I 2 � 199 �g Y. S. L I C. N 0. 49618 AREA 8.,,5 A CRES{ ' REFERENCED 1 '. ! G U. ii` Ou THr11 G S 8 D/ESA:. T�4r17CS ' w �AS 10,000 411,22 GAL. DIESEL 6 000 AL.Berm Aord 3-j992, F APrz 3,/992 t51 7 - P. 0. BOX 9 0 9 ,��s/o~ FEa ✓9,/99-L R`.:V;Sir?f i'%EC. 26,1991 MAIN ROAD REV'SION DEC. 10,199I SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 D. K. 88 726 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS `;� SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward "' '. �'� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . Fax (516) 765-1823 July 22, 1992 Donald Cocks, Manager Matt-A-Mar Marina P.O. Box 1235 Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Site plan for addition to Touch of Venice Restaurant at Matt-A-Mar Marina SCTM#1000-114-3-1 Dear Mr. Cocks: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Tuesday, July 21, 1992. WHEREAS, Ali Agarabi is the owner of the property known and designated as Touch of Venice Restaurant at Matt-A-Mar Marina SCTM#1000-114-3-1, located at Wickham Avenue and Mattituck Creek in Mattituck; and WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was submitted on February 10, 1992; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8) , Part 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on June 30, 1992; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and WHEREAS, this site plan was certified by Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector on July 6, 1992. 1 Page 2 Matt-A-Marina Marina be it therefore, RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys for the restaurant addition dated March 11, 1992. This approval applies to the restaurant addition only and does not imply approval of the plan for the marina. This approval is subject to a one year review from date of building permit. Please contact this office if you have any further questions. Very truly yours, ennett Orlowski, Jr. - Chairman Encl. cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Scott Russell, Town Assessors Office /y) A TAIY )AF_ iY)A2iMq IAvc ;: REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN. ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION SECTION—BLOCK—LOT TAX MAP 'NUMBERS : !NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER OF RECORD v r,NAME & ADDRESS OF PERSON PREPARING MAP � !. DATE, NORTH POINT AND WRITTEN & GRAPHIC SCALE v ; !DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY & INFORMATION TO DEFINE BOUNDARIES \ i v' ILOCATIONS, NAMES & EXISTING WIDTHS OF ADJACENT STREETS & CURBS "-NIiILOCATION & OWNERS OF ALL ADJOINING LANDS, AS SHOWN ON TAX RECORDS I � ;LOCATION & PURPOSE OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS !COMPLETE OUTLINE. OF EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS APPLYING TO PROPERTY ": EXISTING ZONING 'AREAS SUBJECT TO FLOODING OR STORM WATER OVERFLOWS '': ;WATER COURSES, MARSHES, WOODED AREAS, TREES 8" IN DIAMETER OR MORE ,ANY BUILDING WITHIN 100 ' OF PROPERTY - PAVED AREAS, SIDEWALKS, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO PUBLIC STREETS 1EXISTING SEWERS, CULVERTS, WATERLINES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO PROPERTY , ' FENCING LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING . .,' PROPOSED BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURAL IMPROVI.MENTS dOFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING AREAS ! OUTDOOR LIGHTING OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS '' OUTDOOR -SIGNS ':! 239K SIDEWALKSLOCATIONS WIDT �WID THS: SIZE OF WATER AND SEWER LINES OLZ.d UIL Nu A n -�-° �- ov :i MNr�1IM(�*JP ^V ��r1ryf �� I cg ,_Maft A �l Marinas P0. cS 13235-Mkituck,N.Y 1195,E 516 298 4739 July 13, 1993 Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road, Town Hall Southold, New York 11871 Re: Revised site plan, Security Fence Dear Board Members, I have finally received the revised site plan for Security Fence " that we had discussed at a working session back in April of this year. As per- the boards suggestion and approval, the location of the fence should help in cutting the vandalism we have had in the past. As agreed to, we will be using a green chain link along with additional landscaping along the fence line. Thank you for the opportunity to work along with the board and if I can help in the future please call. Yours Truly, Donald Cocks, Manager- JUL 1 61 1993 " SOUTNOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD G' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �1 Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 7, 1993 Donald Cocks, General Manager Matt-A-Mar Marina P.O. Box 1235 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed Fencing for r Matt-A-Mar Marina Mattituck, N.Y. - SCTM# 1000-114-3-1 Dear Mr. Cocks: The Planning Board has received your letter of March 12, 1993, requesting the Board' s comments on the proposed fence you plan to place on the property. The fence should be placed between the landscaping and the parking area in order to conceal it from view across either the water or the road. A suggested alternate location of the proposed fence is shown in yellow on the enclosed copy of the Matt-A-Mar site plan. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector i u � pu Re Matt._�A. 1Vlar anna c PO Box:`1235-Mattituck,N Y 119 52 ' March 12, 1993 516 298 4739 ,� f Town of Southold Planning Board .. . .=� v� Main Road, Town Hall Southold, N. Y. 11871 Attn: Bob Kassner Dear Mr. Kassner Could you please examine the site plan copy enclosed to see if the r Planning board approves of the' location of the proposed security . fence. I understand that if the location is approved the board will require a updated site plan. Due to the high cost of updating the plan a preliminary approval of the submitted plans along with any recommendations would be greatly appreciated. I will then submit the plan to my ;surveyor to update our plan and then submit copies to the Planning Board. Thanking You in Advance Donald Cocks, Manager Matt-A-Mar Marina Tax Map — Sec 114, Block 3, Lot 1 SOUTHOLO Z IAIIII PLMOING,BOARD TOUCH OF VE AT MA-T-A-MAR MARINA,.INC. / MATTITUCK N.Y. 1000 =114 . 03.- 01SCALEI csaNOScgPi�C7 1 i�' �' / / `e.e ` 0yo /. •. \ \\A _ FEB. Zg1 9 00 F T12EES r Pvan/rS ate �� N /O / F LAND OF B AKER •J ARC• IJ a !(( /gyp-;{;a^ A 65.05'40'E. 215.03• ui ` � 0 +\ ' lk `cP ,.Q110 PAeKrMG a `�cfiab.A\ rcL \ . rua naa Os.0 lY"�(6'•, r.In;-^a' /.rey MF3R( A \I Q�94 PI) . O p o r • ; �ts..: Aa�seo rwlsr \" �a.,f.aa uu.n it-1��:�� •`• �¢'a•a '. j/ / �yFit I nu c.r r+d+L \i i'rn ... cfnct l r PARi<IrVG� I 3 i r / nat �J i 0 Q1.18 — ( / r Q et.c f�aic"•ya_ I ♦. au # - •c. 3 �: -GRA Y L•-.�•.r.—�—}x :'•�_i�;;• _,._..•Aa'°F:` 1 f4 F as_ nat . t.• _ — A 7 caaaa ' ^jtabaa FE_—•. [ a.�a*wa e6ct• Y^¢ ~� f is u t■aa- 1 t. '•.2- M.e'N• O �� .} I L-_- Z w PARK;f6 w • !I as f r/• ! t me '�\ �p as.c� •-�� — - --- -- :oa' �.%r-a- y •'� u f _ ./ 1 - �nat ma '' ;•£� r nu a r 1 F� �fb c+ srau•�as 1 1 �'t a• . .ar rw - BO i' _ I a. I ` Q na •'-•., -•• _p a a art }LJ1 -- `i•�-. y _ STORA 1 '-•"_— _ BUILDING nn f•ta ,• — -'aoa7''Aft.f+'• i.r•! r -lr' •!-�: na-fu.. at.1.1 .. (., P! -'''' ,�? �w {—• y'. �;. — ., zoo' - _ _ :+. •a•ra4• 0 �d ,L•j t ,..., Y -�, R ; i.• •, t,4 ./'� •' 1 ► �yy' ^ _• .._. EA( H H A 'STI •` GRAVEL AE• - - 1 sosr .a a•a 1; . . _ --�•�-` _ _E• (i.� aa,co -.� ..., •:. _. � --• _ .r•e■ �• t G9• ti 'S. -0 U -� �• a � -s ` ••' 1 Y� �, 1!1�ci: O"SSTil't7TO iC�7CLtT'�-�� � 10 —__�` mot , 'a _ �•�' del? � � z ..: ',.� - - - -• - - - �� � - ' . `. \ ••y .� •-y�� �~* ..! �� _-AP!•ROnuATE SHORE LIME HICK YfAT R MA 0— „�_ , `•"i•�O v # 1 r•e \` _,+ +i•e 1 ' _ f _ � �7'�%E� / IcL&hby\ •1 —"-� r '�j i .:���,i, r r J CREAK /f J f' SO WY S2. a ` --- MA TIT`UCK (51 A.502� � • 6 - t j1� .�\V F'ENeE PkOIJ05E40 P o �- 1 Q CZC000&;0 L L L`O L-t&J E PLAN OF TOUCH DE VENICE AT k kT-=A-MAR MARINA,-INC. yyn/OSCA/�/NC -MATTITU.CK, N.Y. rREEs �,,+ / �• 1000 114 -'030- Ad ° � .• S�I11.E�.1. � 10 /° 'a%'c. 1 l �• •`` \�\a • LAND OF RAKER K 65'05,40 215.03' W t•ar• ce LCT z LLI nra saO 2)1.a \G� ♦ ��._ 1�/♦.4 R/N S /� b \ = i / o \/' \ �♦ \ S� b Q - /1 /� /✓� i O na ' nn Orau It nst♦1�. va��-��' P/E f -1: ,:.. rA( � / ( �. / _ .r/rO nu / .� 1• � � '.va cariaii r4_L��_—� .�� �.{'� — ' rare / •'- _a � rat na[ a 4,Y a� .�1ei'r.r ,. orncr I / PAf=2KlIVG�` 3 (n4 i.� // nfiiO - O Ona[1.19 bs�.�l (•� .•.� r..ete• . /� ��_) n Tct1 a' OT1a+f =514 . 4 a ra('�. 1 ma[' au: •r• •..• •�- rRAVEL .ROAD ' •'4!'•. 14 _ •iot • ( ��. �r Q caiaA -- :'. __ \ •tea V 1 / O ww ,J ! ./ 1 t At♦ Q•aa ` ar�ci •; - �• G^.�`'r - wa PAt?KDYC .•i r ,i3- r,•. a ♦ 1 / I 1 .. rNar Q +.t. •• .p ra-[a[♦' -\0 — -1 - I . •100., 1 Tta[ \`` ^�q °rift .Pfrt" ' --• — tat' - '4cf.'�:�i F`--'•[- ''•..,�.'�•: •/ O 11 I-. nu \\uO [rw't ma a°'t •'.''� . .(�iarrm_ El _ - 1 �(.— I nit!) \ ��- •T m _ _ _ ®UIL0I.NG _ r'•.� lQs I s & o _ I _ „ • � - ice' _ W. ♦ •• Er1:TI' O P -O ..'. 1 \ R _• �. .. •:.'• - EX7'ST1N13 ••� GRAvEI 'AAE4 ••'.•.� t ! ✓ U Y IJ J, f t ,-. 1 •oar 'atia•(N•li. -`.•_.' - -`••—_ .•% —i- - axee �+ V _\ .. .. , rYi •. l •l as aKm-•' •• -. - •. ,• _ _ _ .1•la n I \. •. _,.aCi(� �� a•na_z uT�•• O'STPtJ'E•ET 0-5 Co X4 AR ��_ , ,•��P Vi I /. 1 • \ •V►fl OYIY ATE SNOR[L1 NE ' � � � . . r( � I ts•�Ali,,�'�J' '� ,� .•'• - 60 CREEK 4 P SUN ' NiA�`TITUCK g� , 1 °p �J! y'��OZ b\°� f`O r . `� i, r--- -- --� C— I P7 C-i�tpL►>Jt� L_1 LC0 L_11V l - — , . .... _ .... ,. . M1 - att Aar arina March 12, 1993 POµBbx 1235-MattiA,N.Y 11952 516 298 4'39 -=I� Town of Southold Planning Board _ > Main Road, Town Hall °<{ Southold, N. Y. 11871 Attn: Bob Kassner Dear Mr. Kassner Could you please examine the site plan copy enclosed to see if�h� Planning board approves of the location of the proposed security fence. I understand that if the location is approved the board will require a updated site plan. Due to the high cost of updating the plan a preliminary approval of the submitted plans along with any recommendations would be greatly appreciated. I will then submit the plan to my surveyor to update our plan and then submit copies to the Planning Board. Thanking You in Advance Donald Cocks, Manager Matt-A-Mar Marina Tax Map - Sec. 114, Block 3, Lot 1 MAR 2 41993 SOUTHOl_D WAIN PLANNING BOARD 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ,, ,�3 �, ����`� I'P7 SCOTT L. HARRIS 1 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor 111 George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward `` Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 11, 1993 Donald Cocks, General Manager Matt-A-Mar Marina P.O. Box 1235 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM# 1000-114-3-1 Dear Mr. Cocks: The Planning Board has received your letter of January 27, 1993, requesting the Board's comments on the proposed fence you plan to place on the property. The -fence should be placed behind the landscaping in order to conceal it from public view. Please show the proposed fence on a revised site plan. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Richard s Ward Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector S�BGi 645 'X January 27, 1993 diL:4 �1 �1�1.�.1!1 Marina. PO.Box 1,235-Matti.tuck N.Y 1�1.952` ;s Town of Southold Planning Hoard 516 298 4739 ' . �r Main Road, Town Hall Southold, New York 11871 Attn: Richard Ward Dear Mr. Ward Matt-A-Mar is requesting necessary permits for the installation of a 6' high security fence that will run along our North, East and South borders (see the enclosed plan) and will also enclose our boat storage area. We recently had problems with a break in of several of our boats and in the past some of our equipment has been vandalized. The Building Dept. has a application and the next step is to obtain a letter of non jurisdiction from the D.E.C. and the necessary approvals from the Planning Department. We hope to keep the fence in along the tree line, away from the sidewalk so the landscaping will help conceal it. Could you please let me know the boards suggestions and what approvals I will need. Thanking You in Advance Donald Cocks, Manager Matt-A-Mar Marina Tax Map - Section 114, Block 3, Lot 1 P.O. 1235 Wickham Ave. Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 298-4739 JAN 2 9 1993 Lj SOUTHOLD PLANWNa_ G C •4'•�,,,a, PLAN OF TOUCH OF VENICE � �� G� - -' •-,�, AT MAT-A-MAR MARINA,.INC. MATTITUCK, N.Y. 00 f`°•' +� %" - �; 1000 -'114 - 03 - 01 coo / - •. ' - \ SCALES i• - 100' FEB. 2SJ992 �,�\,J 1 I / j' •\ \� LANE OF 9AKER � .o • / i „ m .. / /IJ / /• j� •a. {( (II��P'••'a^ —mow N 63'00'40•= 217.OJ' Lo � / /• i �/ // /// "O �,..a \\`�T r•v�i r-� I/1.iRI.Yc `h� °` \\ ..t ■ /I' I �:i-•' 9 °IF� [ GR.I YRL ` \I ( O r , cant O Q O 'i' ..■:::.rNi 1��`;':...�, y�:, nu nta io•.. ff y` Cl nn Ont■ I/ Q a■.� � C14 rws �n.■ _ - - / a+•.at �_L a ��� r t ■t,a•. -.aa fi I. G 11 L V L"� RO.0`, .. • '� t:'. it JV i CIA, n:■ �� �'- 7 cu <.o:a FE. uowanw ac i n r ° I ' t O '•t. .e' E...•P•' Q Iir-_, ml / '� / � .� Ana\ ++■ '. i.♦-`\ .�� �l.a■- `_''•_'. Z w.c:u �i- ^f4 Q�\ �. ■rw��"'r i/�.• � ..."r'a. STORA I ■"y�'.j•°•�• :�, . 1 _ _ i - ' � O rn■ � ;-,cm' Kzrs -.. i r i' - i-•, 8 U I L D I N G _ .�� ]�'1 •.�= e4 I i ,• I �nu �.I _ -._ •__:.• ���� _ p •=�..G:_,- - n..na. •.Iu .. •: I'-r�1T' �' • � II I � _�� _ '-.. �•mil'. - .,� FIR .� _ .••:. �� C - P a a '.>� 'f' •Eye-- -;M •'.ca' Q 3� In 's 4 1 �t _ /' �i�i .- it�+ �'• � � '�A',,§+� ioo• :O c'aln+ d �r �� '.\ - �•ETI STIMB- •GRAVEL 'ARE. .,c ��' ! •f - a•�� (� �� iD_i �,�,'i�%`JS- � `i voiaooa._ -e¢- - — .I •n:• .I._ _ .� _ - is —/ U _ :, • \• ', ,., - T ✓/ J'T crZ: ,.'—Z�?T TSTE'/T_�7"Ci=71aT�' ``' ••' _-� - v.ca :� - .• is r ` � :� ... • . /'�� .�P •a _ O 1` I\� `•t.• '/ •�• �`a �1`� �^ \ -•APPROXIMATE SMORELIi.E HIGH p. EflN CREEK PE S�JRVEYQgS, MATTITUCK L\ = , �{C��o W •— (o, Ia 1 GA hfw21T*l FC £ 60-14KN�J Lit-i k ` f!OL iv is '111� .. PLAN OF _ TOUCH OF VENICE AT MAT-A-MAR MARINA,.INC. MATTITUCK, N.Y. 1000 - 114 - 03 - QI / \ \ • t'EIL 264992 � ��.. r' , / j• '\ � \\\ LAND OF 9AKER1.o / t / of.. N zz �aP 03'40•� z19.OJ' o f i / ✓✓ Il Is✓ � �— a 2 c.Ej_ � ._ \_ pp\ T r\ Ld Lof Lu /' raa Orau p!f' °re.. r.�.'- � f.r•.., —� MfAR/ A I�Q# n �� � I / .•/� -, /•One. // {Jf Yr:. ~:' `+a+. �� � as a�ti>s uali `\\ � •r' •�' / . Q rra f O-r.aa:rA.+�•i'{ % .•w.rr �� �-_. E / !� �Q �'� // �•nas Qna+ O Onaa Qnaa NP•.,�,�1`.1�� �q .• I /� PARKI G�`__I�3 C j/�.�/ • / ` r naa. r•u naa � / � C �r�r_ I' rr,, t' a < • > I • naa # :r, _ '. GfttV y•--- '.AG•0 ^: 55 V ti / .i { naa rV Q ,ucci — O •. ..0. �c�a.. }^)ca<•i__ —___ '� \ �' �~14 f� a.N• Q alu_r. I 1 I w .,u.?AR/fNG ° / "ca r.a. .b . D a• .Pha / �'•I Q-' 1 /r � - naa ya� •. `l t +rwd� }1��'1�+" ��,'•..'V�' J,�� BO 1 d n.�\ = aro.•+a m'r U .•iC � - ...'.r.. STORA 1 _/7.�'-_• 1 I rua� OU rsa ��� uac ,,, /'� _ :l - BUILDING .�_'( /�'• �Q �.t •.�< d ' � 1 • I • Osaaa \•1` — Z<L0 Kr�� 11' �-.�� I.• Iu. ;a...a .�(���5'TJ1I W i_ _ 1 1 + aara , y.�y: � Q'.{' •�•i �+ft.�A.. .- _` _a�..c -ro��-• \ = - //( �i� / �i. �L:Isr1N3 GPI•VL� a a � __'i .•_ .^ ,./-" S? I _{�� CA _'ter[—sn � � 1` , �: �•/'' �/ I` � \ `-1PPN 0%IM qiL SNOflfllllf HIGH Ma [Ilr R \ + K tv6ATT1TUCK CREEK P�jC i SWVEYOfS, , a f` �G ICON CF-EIJI� (�Iti3KCUJ�I'�`l ANC ��'Ffi.•';� �1> ,! „`` /�°.-• t PLAN OF TOUCH OF VENICE AT MAT-A-MAR MARINA,,INC. MATTITUCK, N.Y. 1000 =-1I4 - 03 - 0I SCAI-I:+ I'Q a92 I00' w000E0 \� LAND OF BAKER L� ram / ; \ 4OP 6� •� r— � � P. u / 4,0 i/ dll , ;:'il N. °-S'03'40• a 215.03' Ld L - /`-' .• rut '�'a t`—_—,�_�- - a..�rMc \ I a J 1/ the l ` �,/ / . Tr[ ,l rut t 61• J ...f,�>iP �, �R T ( G R A V Lc t ` \ $ O / / �/ / - O p Orauf6.'(`•l .±,, Pq_„y I M1A.•�L zl { rr��•� r -a:... •� �Po wrw rww ` _ / � v. can c r•� �• _` ' •,-��Q' � /'/ � rut naa v C �' '/ / na( 0 Q On.a rP4•P�.•Q(C1' c,P.��� ..'a �� PAP.KI G� ! 3 e I f 67#Jrl ' 's /� Z :tier �. f .. naa � , ..:r- _ •'- ' Gknv �— — ..FOB°. ., -_ •.:•, .. -�� 6 V - - ` 4 • , jai•_' .f, 4 1 � 1 as a,'r 0 •u`a" � -. •- ,.'•.rfl•�0:.�._.-. �. •. cte.: Fri• —�___•���•'p.'� f ��rs / r I e O nca t ••> �ypt°-, �.� f —i-- uMaaytaPo�t a n..<(' f - _ $�- " KV OP // r '•. O •.t_ • 2¢ rP-a.oa. Q a <.r I 1 i as w. PAJL[9f,•G� . u _ �\ k J I �` rvu •.��`.. y an•[a. .P6Q!tt'il-.`— ' ---___ '.�°• (( I gnu r.�. �q7 ��- raa• :�-..� � !�t er 11 i nu m[O. - -�. c, p.r..a yy��yy9,J���..• ..00.....- _ r �rna. r� ,� i r; BUILDING /��.• `J Q ti � Q K + 1� - •��� �: n..r,a..tu.na ,.✓L.�C��-- � F _ - aoo :QLIN a. eR ,, ,` ••• cx.SLI e M GR aYLI aF[• •''•i- -r •• •/•• 1 ��_r '., t '� ' i pro _ �3 aa.r o •l• t :' ,''c t - •` - :-rr—rrr�rv,-r— no�onno©• r?o :Ss�n� o � , LL — jy.,•,: t ;` ----�--. �,A' � •'t - ... - ley- '� t ,` ,,'l,,••' /' / `�• \ (PPF OXIM A'.( SHORELJ�r MI°R Na ER • � r,r yi 1 41 M�TTITUCK CREEK PE � SVflV£YggS, _� l��LLow - l4i wl OlfigI ICJ L-I Ij K Fet C-6 :SOX F OLA N '11971 - __ I � !{ 1►` Cl A..T-mLa Marina; P Box 1�235-Mattituck,N.Y. 11952` —` 516 298=4739 ! \J� 1� 13� 92 F�4n��111UC-i 3oA 0 �OwsJ cDr- l}t7l,IJ �1T41) . 3• ORLOWSKI G. LpkTHAm ►y% . mc- ()o"rkLo CncN�LCtuAIv P,EASG To •i akS LETT�2 , A COPY OF 1r14C i„I�0'DSC41P6 PL4gly M(AQor A FGw ?6AkS �lcza ►3Y �, �o�FCt ou%asCRe o 1T UJjaS A PLEASuVE AA615Tl0C, (A3vrH YOU 'ANC -fa0+,i+c. qoo FDiL P,400 SQC�CzG:STI Otis Ci I seu ssiolus Li" TUI S We, C f'j wog ae Toe9ETI+C2.- -I'ow I:Ar2DS A S OL0 1-100 114p T e Atu Gee 3 EF{T TIkG -ro w r3 , o u)z "A ei A3 A to�U D -r4s l-oCAI— C'om V"V►)IT-Y PLEr`s F66-Cr -ro cc,Aj-rAcr Dui✓ iF ApDi fiohsk- Qa- i aL,C--f YooR 5 JAN 1 3 �992 �tQ CAC z.'L. 5 aul�nD I INSPECTORS (516) 765-1802 VICTOR LESSARD,Principal h`1` Gy SCOTT L.HARRIS,Supervisor � CURTIS HORTON, Senior y Southold Town Hall VINCENT R.WIECZOREK, Ordinance p .P.O.Box 1179,53095 Main Road ROBERT FISHER, Assistant Fire y ®!� Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Building Inspectors �THOMAS FISHER Telephone (516) 765-1800 GARY FISH OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 11, 1992 TO: B. Orlowski, Chairman, Planning Board .` G. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals J. Bredemeyer, Pres. Board of Trustees FROM: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector ��- SUBJECT: MATT-A-MAR MARINA- BUILDING PERMIT. Attached is copy of letter from Matt-A-Mar Marina dated August 4, 1992 requesting the reinstatement of their building permit. Please advise me if there is any problems with the reinstatement of this building permit. If I do not hear from your department by Friday August 14, 1992, I will reactivate the building permit. VL:gar (attachement) cc to: M. Kiernan, Asst. Town Atty U AM i 1 1992 PLANNING 80ARD 4 r r. r Q F Matt-1 =lia Mr' =� arina F0.Box 1'235-Matti uck,NY 119 5 - 516 298 4739 m August 4, 1992 Office of Building Inspector Town of Southold 53095 Main road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Attn: Victor Lessard Dear Mr. Lessard; I have -just received information that the Southold Trustees granted a waiver at the July 30th meeting, concerning the application that Matt- A-Mar submitted for the wetlands approval of our storage building. This should clear the way for our reinstatement of the building permit. It is important that we get this permit so we can finish our building with the pouring of a cement floor. This floor will need a few months to properly cure and hopefully be ready for Building Departments final inspection before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Any further delay in pouring of this floor will definetly result- severe economic problems for our bussiness, so could you please let me know if I can help you with any additional information. Very truly yours Donald P. Cocks Marina Manager r.• ' 11FF0� � yc CO PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS CO2 SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett'Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Oy �e1� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. O a� Richard G. Ward V Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 LZ 19 John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys for Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply .by 19V. Thank you for your cooperation. Very t /Vyo s, ` L Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. . Gentlemen:~ There is no need for additional firewells for the anges indicated as of the March 11 , 1992 ma . oh n e g ect. attituck Fi e Dist. JUL 15 1992 i S01 T` r s y Ala< ✓ RAYMOND L. JACOBS cn T JAMES A. RIGHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF Q • `� ENGINEERING HIGHWAYS ��01 ��0 INSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JULY 14 , 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 ATTN: ROBERT KASSNER RE: SITE PLAN FOR MAT-A-MAR MARINA, INC. SCTM # 1000-114-03-01 DEAR MR. ORLOWSKI : AS PER A REQUEST FROM YOUR OFFICE, I HAVE CONDUCTED A REVIEW" OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED SITE PLAN. AS PER A TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH MR. KASSNER, MY REVIEW WAS SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED AT THE NEW SEPTIC SYSTEM THAT IS TO BE INSTALLED FOR THE RESTAURANT ADDITION. THE NEW SEPTIC SYSTEM SHOWN ON THE DRAWING APPEARS TO BE ADEQUATE FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. HOWEVER, THIS SYSTEM WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE WITHOUT THE APPROVALS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS REVIEW, PLEASE CONTACT MY OFFICE. CERELY JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. CC: RAYMOND L. JACOBS FILE JUL SOUTHOLD T0WN PLANNING BOARm MEMORANDUM TO: James Richter, Engineering Inspector Q(�,,�, us, . Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman -b.0 _1 RE: Review of drainage for proposed site plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina, Inc. Wickham Avenue & , Mattituck Creek SCTM* 1000-114-3-1 DATE: July 10, 1992 Please review the drainage design for the above mentioned site plan'. If you have any questions, please contact Robert Kassner of this office. Enc. cc: Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent _ y PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS K �? SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Dy� �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �0 Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold'. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 o 19 9a; John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys for Cry Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by 199,�. Thank you for your cooperation. 6 IV t yo s, i Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. fn Alta A YnA2in/q l Ain , 1' ;: REOUIREMENTS .FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION :. SECTION-BLOCK-LOT TAX MAP NUMBERS w \ , NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER OF RECORD i v ;LAME & ADDRESS OF PERSON PREPARING MAP JUL "' 6 1992 tl ;, ,.,DATE,. NORTH POINT AND WRITTEN & GRAPHIC SCALE SOUTHOLD TOINN \ PLANNING BOARD v ; ;DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY & INFORMATION TO DEFINE BOUNDARIES \ i v.:iLOCATIONS, NAMES & EXISTING WIDTHS OF ADJACENT STREETS & CURBS �I'ILOCATION & OWNERS OF ALL ADJOINING LANDS , AS SHOWN ON TAX RECORDS ""LOCATION & PURPOSE OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS !COMPLETE OUTLINE OF EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS APPLYING TO PROPERTY ; EXISTING ZONING i , 'AREAS SUBJECT -TO rFLOODING OR STORM WATER OVERFLOWS iWATER COURSES, MARSHES, WOODED AREAS, TREES 8" IN DIAMETER OP, MORE • 'ANY BUILDING WITHIN 100 ' OF PROPERTY PAVED AREAS, SIDEWALKS, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO PUBLIC STREETS 1EXISTING SEWERS, CULVERTS, WATERLINES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO PROPERTY : ; FENCING LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING IPROPOSED BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS iI .! OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING AREAS ! OUTDOOR LIGHTING OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS JOUTDOOR SIGNS .: 239K SIDEWALKS LOCATIONS WIDTII,,LO AT WIDTHS: SIZE OF WATER AND SEWER LINES j m A-t-tA A e_ Yn gtejNA I tiG. i ;; REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN. ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION i _-- _-- D 4 �- SECTION-BLOCK-LOT TAX MAP NU14BERS i NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER OF RECORD A - 6 1992 � v '',NAME & ADDRESS OF PERSON PREPARING MAP SOUTNpLDTOkhIN PLANNING BOARD � ;.IDATE, NORTH POINT AND WRITTEN & GRAPHIC SCALE Vi DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY & INFORMATION TO DEFINE BOUNDARIES +' !LOCATIONS, NAMES & EXISTING WIDTHS OF ADJACENT STREETS & CURBS I i I LOCATION & OWNERS OF ALL ADJOINING LANDS, AS SHOWN ON TAX RECORDS H LOCATION & PURPOSE OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS .COMPLETE OUTLINE OF EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS APPLYING TO PROPERTY i'l EXISTING ZONING / , I : !AREAS SUBJECT TO FLOODING OR STORM WATER OVERFLOWS `: ;WATER COURSES, MARSHES, WOODED AREAS, TREES 8" IN DIAMETER OR MORE 'ANY BUILDING WITHIN 100 ' OF PROPERTY ' 1 - PAVED AREAS,. SIDEWALKS, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO PUBLIC STREETS - EXISTING SEWERS, CULVERTS, WATERLINES 14ITHIN OR ADJACENT TO PROPERTY - FENCING LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING .,, PROPOSED BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURAL IMPROVE it :, OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING AREAS i � '! OUTDOOR LIGHTING. OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS � i ' OUTDOOR 239K SIGNS- SIDEWALKS LOCATIONS WIDTHS:. SIZE OF WATER AND SEWER LINES - - 1 ,ar t . =C PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ,� ® Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 June 30, 1992 Donald Cocks, Manager Matt-A-Marina P.O. Box 1235 Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina SCTM#1000-114-3-1 - Dear Mr. Cocks: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 291 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlows�iJr. Chairman Encl. �(9 . �; , PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS "r'` ' ' L' - SCOTT L. HARRIS r 1, Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman � °�,r�'�.'':���:,� � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance June 29, 1992 . This notice is issued pursuant to part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina SCTM# : 1000-114-3-1 Location: South of- Wickham Avenue and east of County Route 48, on Mattituck Creek SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X ) Description of Action: Proposed addition to existing 2,064 square foot restaurant building, for use of food preparation, storage space and equipment, as well as two bathrooms for handicapped patrons as mandated by the Suffolk County Health Department. Page 2 Matt-A-Mar Marina SEQR Negative Declaration Cont. Reasons Supporting This Determination: The project involves an addition to an existing 2,064 square foot restaurant building, for the use of food preparation, storage space and equipment, as well as two bathrooms for handicap patrons as mandated by the 'Suffolk . County Health Department. The existing marina conforms to existing zoning in terms of use and the existing restaurant is a use permitted by special exception by the Zoning Board of Appeals, thus the proposed action is consistent with zoning.. The applicant has received Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval for construction. This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with the established requirements of the health code. There were no fauna identified that are classified as endangered species, threatened species or other species of special concern, nor were there any rare plants observed. Because there has been correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Based upon the above review of environmental resources of the subject land division, is determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. I - page 2 Matt-A-Mar Marina For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: ( 516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Roger Evans, DEC Commissioner Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Building Department Zoning Board of Appeals Town Trustees - Applicant PLAf� '1N( OARD MEMBERS r G` "a SCOTT L. HARRIS 'I y f'._. .. Supervisor Bonn; t Or wski, Jr., Chairman GJ rye ' [chic Latham, Jr. lard G. Ward �_ ' .� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman-�4•P5 RE: Site Plan for MATT-A-MAR Marina Wickham Avenue, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-114-3=1 DATE: June 23 , 1992 Please review the attached for certification. �ECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. P.O. Box 909 —J 54655 Main Road �L � Southold, MY, 11971 � 516-765-5020 FAX 516-765-1797 John T.Metzger,L.S. June 22, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road / Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn. Bob Kassner Re. Matt-A--Mar Marina 1000-114-03-01 Dear Mr. Kassner, Attached you will find seven survey maps of the Matt-A-Mar Marina, reflecting March 11 , 1992 additions . Please feel free to contact me if you require any additional information, Sincerely, Mrs. Therese A. Szymczak 1 /tas Att . s«.1. r F SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: j 7 7 SUBJECT: SCTM* : COMMENTS: D JUN r�. 1 SO�THOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD CRAMER, V RH SOCIATES ENVIRONMENT / G CONSULTANTS June 18, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board E�' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road D P.O. Box 1179 JUN 2 4 1992 ` Southold, NY 11971 y� Re: Review of Long EAF sou dsyif.�}BOARDMatt-A-Mar Marina,Wickham Avenue,Mattituck P� r SCTM# 1000-114-3-1 Dear Benny: As per your request we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I.LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The site is currently a marina with associated uses including a restaurant, swimming pool, and boat repair contained on 8.75 acres. The proposal involves an addition to an existing 2,064 square foot restaurant building, for the use of food preparation, storage space and equipment, as well as two bathrooms for handicap patrons as mandated by the Suffolk County Health Department. If necessary portions of the addition could be used for additional seating in the future. The site is located at the head of the Mattituck Creek directly south of Wickman Avenue and east of Middle Road (C.R. 48), in Mattituck, New York. The project is an unlisted action, and a Long EAF has been submitted for review and coordination purposes. The subject site is located in an area zoned Marine II, allowing water related uses such as marinas based on a minimum lot size of 80,000 square feet of land above high water. The existing marina conforms to the existing zoning in terms of use; however, the existing restaurant is a use permitted-by special exception by the zoning board of appeal. In review of the proposed addition to the restaurant, it is apparent that the area intended for expanded use does not contain any sensitive environmental resources. Page 1 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 M' Matt-A-Mar Marina,Mattituck Long EAF Review The area includes the existing restaurant, a building used for overnight camp-style accommodations,both surrounded by limited landscaped areas and lawn area. The overall parcel is dominated by lawn area, gravel surface and trees located throughout the landscaped parts of parcel. There were no fauna identified that are classified as endangered species, threatened species or species of special concern, nor were there any rare plants observed. There were no other significant environmental findings noted on the 8.75 acres related to the site plan amendment. From a planning perspective it is noted that there is adequate area for parking on the site including parallel parking north of the storage building and a parking field north of the access road. Both of these areas are relatively close to the restaurant. The restaurant will be used for boat clientele as well as those that come by car, and if successful it is expected that the restaurant would be operated year run. We believe that in the decision on this project, the Planning Board should ensure that adequate parking is provided by eliminating boat storage from those areas required for restaurant parking according to the code. Based upon a review of the environmental resources of the subject expansion of the restaurant,we believe that the expansion will not have a significant environmental impact. The proposed project is in a Critical Environmental Area, in recognition area sensitivity. Nye feel that a Negative Declaration could be appropriate for the subject application, in accordance with the Criteria for Determining Significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, provided specific measures noted above are incorporated into the proposed project. I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to complete review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very t Charles I Voorhis, CEP,AICP enc: Part I/II LEAF CRAMER, V R SOCIATES Page 2 ENVIRONMENT j� G CONSULTANTS 14-T6-2 (2/87)-7c ` » 617.21 SEAR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer•-Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may.have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: A Part 1 9 Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: -'A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. O B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment- ; raE tnq a�significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures describe r� S= .aVe been relquired,: therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* O C. The project may result in one or more large-and i 9� 1� fl' S important impacts that i� have11a sagfn2L impact on the'environment'therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions SOLiE;'t"r, PL;7i`1fuld;; T T - - HA IC AlA Name of Action n 0 P6'C V Al`i f2 , 77co-/alb ll :Name o.L Lead Agency Print or p ame of Re,spo le O ficer in Lead gency Title.of Resl)onsible Officer =qZ Signature of Responsi e-Officer in JLeaAgency Signature of Prepare!r(If ifferent from responsible officer) Jq Date PART 1—PROJECT INFORM N Prepared by Project Spo"O NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to-these questions will be considered Js part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional: information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will.be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION The addition to existing restaurant to include handicap bathrooms LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Matt-A-Mar Marina Wickham Ave. P.O. Box 1235 Mattitu.ck, L.I. 11952 NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR B(S�N,E$;II;.),�PF�Qt�IJ~ Ettore Permacchia �711b (�ytj b411 i ADDRESS 49 Maplewood Ave, Selden, N.Y.' 11784 or C/O Matt-A-Mar P.O. Box 1235, Mattituck L.I. CITY/PO �r� Selden l .Y. Zf CM NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Ali Agarabi ( 516) 298 4739 ADDRESS 306 Prospect Ave. CITY/PO STATE ZLP CODE Sea Cliff, N.Y. 11579 iDESCRIPTION OF ACTION The addition to •a existing building ( approx. 48' X 431 ) for the use of food prep. storage space, equipment such-as heating system, hot water boiler and plumbing, ' frezzers and refridgerators, and 2 handicap bathrooms as per Suffolk County Health Dept, directive. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description' Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) .SRural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture Other Y IpR N 7-\' w 1-174 RESTAJRANT t ' 2. Total acreage of project area: 26 acres. -In_�' &7�'r' CLC . As Pd�'Z PJAA1. , APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRc)P'5AT`f to AcQ� 3 _ PRESENTLY AFTER. MPLETION �+�r Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural)( LAW lJ Are;)e;) ' YM acres 2,7•s 6;-o,•--acres Forested I acres I acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) O acres O acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 1 acres I acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces •�. acres `�:`. acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site?. `soft- . S1911D WNW- p�ul�etllEl-(4JE?,hEAO . a. Soil drainage: Kwell drained O % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site J&Poorly drained IC) % of sits F'd tA4, QnGI T,,, �yyy b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). O U If 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ]Yes a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) _ ; :;_.,V ` v J 2 V SOUTHOLD TOG%'N `` PLANNING BOARD S. Approximate percentage of pr Se( roject site with slopes: ❑0-10% _% 010-15% % ❑15% ater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes [KNo _ 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National fral Landmarks? ❑Yes ONo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 1(� (in feet) X 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? e 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes IKNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes KNo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ❑Yes PNo Describe 13. Is the ject site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Vy es ONo - If 'yes, explain A mARII.Sf?, Fog COS,ICnQEZS 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? )4Yes 5�No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Y1n1'1't 1'UCK. CREEK a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary ► f r-rLrUM C2 ?t✓ T'n MPfTTITc1CL- rNUcT CKCEK 110 LOt, ScAND SCk,)f-+I) 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name S::�S eC3o.0 b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Mes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ®.Yes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes ®No 18. Is the site located in an .agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes Flo 19. Is the site located in or substantial) con f lous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Yet 20. Has the site ever been.,used for the dis//p sal of solid or hazardous wastes.? .. ❑Yes WNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) 8. 7�j aC- per S law— a. Pla a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres n b. Project acreage to be developed: •2g��c • acres initially; .Z5 I-/f-->1cc • acres ultimately. ` c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped _ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: © (If appropriate) e. If the project is'an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 50 %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing Ial ; proposed 2-5Q g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour.Ja�C>.fFs (upon completion of project).? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 2C7 Ilheight; `13 width; y 8 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? a ft. t�ocgTE� ct,: PRiJATC Oxcr-)GV_T-y 3 2.• How much natural niater(o rock, earth, etc.) will be removed f e site? tons/cubic yards _ 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Oyes ONO ON/A a. If yes, for what intend,.,: purpose is the site being reclaimed? _ b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes (WNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes j7No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction S months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO 8. Will blasting-occur during construction? Oyes XNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction -r-� after project is complete 5-ArnE 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project O 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes KNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ONO a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? RYes ONO Type. 4eAr-n-I oc-Fr APMNEO SCP-1IC 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes �ZNo SiSi`cf\-A Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes �ZNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? CRYes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? MYes p3No c. If yes, give name LwayII location CiW +t:k VQ0E_ d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes RNo e. If Yes, explain CMGCVC.�l�b� Mk -IZIPA6(1G CA -QiS30�D , _Ph�p�2 t 9t-C . 17. ,Will the project .involve the disposal of solid waste? Oyes ONO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, wHa't is the anticipated site life? years. ' 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes J9No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Yes ONO ` 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes ENO 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? WYes ONO If yes , indicate type(S) A0D1 r1nNgL C�t_ECT_RIC FoR LIC,i+Tx QVa Cl �J 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. L 24. hoes project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes MNo If Yes, explain 4 25• Approvals Required: Submittal �ype Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes (XNo Clity, Town, Village Planning Board. IRYes ❑No 11PPL►CAT1C10 slrtr PAW M%�•y ''92 City, Town Zoning Board' ®Yes []No ig(rL4L,0nofJ U-e P.eX►uir City, County Health Department ®Yes ❑No SAN ITAIZY 9 Other Local Agencies ®Yes ❑No 601L_01tJG DEPE Other Regional Agencies [--]Yes ZNo State Agencies Dyes [�No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ZNO C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a'planning or zoning decision? ®,Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance Ospecial use permit ❑subdivision Osite plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? M 2_ rnAR►NA Rr`�T�URAN1�, 1-EEw�� f1.{p2111C 3. What is the maximum,potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? . 3 0 61 a l oY Go✓�r e 20�o �.1�-tn d � a.Ld -Z 61a Q-4 b Ld, tv"' cat Q Sm.000 zvr 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? �- 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zonin ? WE COUL-n PD.0 '(O l'XiSi►t.1C� ►�iylt_nfNf�S � f� F4orEL�VUQr-rL i ELcoac Al 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Xyes ❑No C 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/ mile radius of proposed action? REs�ocuT�� 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? ®,Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots aA�,�posed? wZA a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? /V 10-. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? gYes ❑No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? XYes i:.;;rlo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Ayes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes lXNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge, A �licant/ —��`�� <' Date 5- I -CTa p( S�err�ar Name - �C�C Signature Tittle A o, 9 U e �� c If the action is in (fie Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2=PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR._ AAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency! General Information (Read Carefully) " • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses, and determinations been reasonable? The, reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • l�lehtifying that.an impact will be potentially Large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact4riust be'-evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further.,. : • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. . • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c.:if answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column'1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about siie of the impact then 7conside'r`the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 �- Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By . 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to th project site? Project Change Impact Impact O ':'.YES Examples thht would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ENO foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑Yes. [ jNo 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑Yes [—No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes DNo 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ El Yes ENO than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑Yes � No tons of natural material (i.e.; rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes LINO • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect v• ...iy u;:,que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)!;',/NO OYES • Specific land forms: ! Cl ❑ ❑Yes El No 6 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Consety t n Law, ECL) AO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑Yes []No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water'body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existin�g�°r new body of-water? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes []No, 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? XNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. F' ❑ ❑Yes ❑No C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not L El El Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 s., ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water C ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ El Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities-which presently ti j ❑ []Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: V ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No �. 6 Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns or surface water runoff? XNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 7 �1 2 3 II to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or end red species? DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threate or non-endangered species? O DYES. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100'years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ` The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, et5.) 8 Wall to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 8gricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly du.e to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? NO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Se tion 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would-apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure`0 istoric, pre- historic or paleontological importance? LINO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 / \ • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes" ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 N0 OYES • -The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational pportun'ity. , ❑ '❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the comm'�ynity. 0 ❑ ❑Yes El No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 9 • IMPACT O�ANSPORTATION 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation syst ms? Moderate Large Mitigated.By NO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 i •,Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 0Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 56/o increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to.serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibra n as a result of the Proposed Action? - NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely`(more than one hour per day). ❑. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No , • Proposed Action' will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe y N0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may.result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, . poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ E] El Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other,disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO .within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. , • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No . 10 IMPACT ON GR H AND CHARACTER 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact_ Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the exist'& community? Impact Impact Project Change O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Al• The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the �s ❑ El Yes I ]No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑Yes CNo will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑Yes C-No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. <<� ❑ ❑Yes F�No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ El Yes ❑,No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community.services ❑ Dyes 9" IN (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set.an important precedent for future projects. Dyes F]No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. 3-1 ❑ El Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 19. .Is there, or is there likely to be, public controver .y related to potential adverse environmental impacts? NO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part-3 must be prepared 'if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact- • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 . o PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward `` Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 e June 1, 1992 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, NY 11764 RE: Review of EAF Mat-A-Mar Marina Wickham Avenue, Mattituck Zoning Code: Marine II (MII) SCTM# 1000-114-3-1 Dear Mr. Cramer & Voorhis: The Southold Planning Board hereby refers the Long Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned site plan to your office for review. Please submit your response by June 22, '1992. The Planning Board has received the $400. 00 review fee from the applicant. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. If there are an questions, y q please contact the Planning Staff . Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encls. SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM# : COMMENTS: f! e L� 4c 's MAY 2 7 1992 SOUTHOLD TMYN PLANNING BOARD H� GA. Ccov«� M- bt A .., ill Marina F Box 1235-Mattituck,N.Y. 1052" 516 298 47\ 9 1 March 11, 1992 Planning Board Office d Town of Southold 53095 Main- Road P. O. Box' 1179 Southold, -New York 11971 RE: Matt-A-Mar Marina Cafe Matt-A-Mar Marina Cafe - Touch of Venice Tax Map Sec 114 - Block 3 - Lot" 1 Renovation to existing Safe for addition of two (2) handicap restrooms as required bg Dept of Health and Town of Southold, utility room and small �obby area. phone # (516) 298-4739 ( C'o►�iAeTS a �'Ti o2E �i��N��IGCt}1�1 HoML "`E(,G-. 5i(o-(098 -(0go3 Res VAuaRur3LF.ASE6/IIAaW-115e- Huss . fY 51(o- 29$- bes \0 DotJgLD� Cocks - mAQ1rJR ry►AN ACgER E�,i e- Z97• ` -13q v rt D �y 6 LS � Li LS f ERR - 1 1992 f' ,IJP"111dG BOARD ®�UFF011r c :e PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y -*:'.� �.'' .' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Off, ge^`' �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. low Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 22, 1992 Donald Cocks, General Manager Matt—A—Mar Marina P.O. Box 1235 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Site _Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina SCTM# 1000-114-3-1 Dear Mr. Cocks: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $400.00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. The above mentioned sum must be paid in full before we can authorize our consultant to proceed with the review. The check should be made payable to the Town of Southold. When the consultants complete their review, the Planning Board will consider their findings in making a determination of whether the project will have a significant environmental impact. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman .ti PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS -,a a SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman %✓ '< 'per'` Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward t;s� 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 4 19 9 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: -t 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3 . Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and. a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: 'I A 0 Po sop s/TF P'ZAI Fo R /�liyT- 4 - oy/f 2 • yv/C/�/�i��ri 9�.��- i�f9rrir�lcK �PEEr� Sc1�r�/��p-���-,3-� Requested Action: �ft/ ,o poSEi SITE Pl-Ar/ 1s ro 4.1?d,+,, o,!�q spyfecr cool /901rzod .9iy ) T'i�o l�r9/yD��AP�✓�T/i/looNiSTo .�„� G,ciST'/�yG R��Z�R�INT'LeeATZ-13 aiY RoUrE i�Y rhrs T'i�T'�rct� SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: 1 /g SSNC (51 38. 6) -765- The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( Q This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr.' Chairman CC: Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Building' Department Southold Town Board - Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany U.S. Army Corp of Engineers * Maps -are enclosed for -your review Coordinating agencies SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM# : COMMENTS: MAY 20 1992 }i SOUTH O5 TO`A'+� " 4LA14H G BOARD t ' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 'w ° ' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ® ' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 'b7j $j®@ Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 18, 1992 Donald Cocks, General Manager Matt-A-Mar Marina P.O. Box 1235 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina SCTM# 1000-114-371 Dear Mr. Cocks: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 6, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, . acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, start the coordination process on this Type I ,action. Please do not hesitate. to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, r. Chairman SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: — — SCTM# : COMMENTS: v � . d_ "i6 � y TRUSTEES �`� s SUPERVISOR { John M. Bredemeyer, III, President SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President ® ; '„Ca ' =G Henry P. Smith l Town Hall John B. Tuthill 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson �j °'�� P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 23 , 1992 Don Cocks Matt-A-Mar Marina [APIR 2 4 1992 P.O. Box 1235 Wickham Ave. S4UT►40LD TOWN Mattituck, NY 11952 "'`` ' hIGUTHNG BO�,RD , RE: Matt-A-Mar Marina SCTM #1000-114-3-1 Dear Mr. Cocks: The Southold Town Trustees inspected the site of your proposed wetland permit for your storage building today and request the following information to make your application complete: 1. Please depict a swale and berm feature on your plans shown in cross section such that surface runoff will not be able to flow over the retaining wall and in all areas of which we spoke on field inspection this date. 2. Please show in detail your proposed screening planting south of the building with the exact species you plan to use that is acceptable to the Planning Board and in relation to number one above. 3 . Please indicate in detail your plans for the floor inside the structure, such that we are certain there will be no floor drains or points of entry for toxics. Upon submission of this information the Trustees will be able to coordinate your application with other town departments. As discussed in the field, under current usage and for the purposes of this Board, the structure south of the storage building is presently, functionally, a retaining wall in that it is above the ordinary high water mark and is primarily soil retentive. This is not to say that it was not a bulkhead at the time it was originally constructed. This definition is ours alone and may not reflect the interpretation of other boards in Southold Town. J` A If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, II President, Board of Trustees JMB: jmt cc: Planning Board/ Building Dept. Zoning Board Town Attorney Town Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS w '{ SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O� �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 21, 1992 Donald Cocks, General Manager Matt—A—Mar Marina T fly P.O. Box 1235 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed Site Plan for _ Matt-A-Mar Marina Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM# 1000-114-3-1 Dear Mr. Cocks: A review of your Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) shows several questions have been answered in error and the form has not been signed. The proposed site plan shows a side walk going through. the new restaurant addition. The side walk should be removed from the plan, or a note "to be removed" should be written on the plan. Also, the location of the dumpster must be shown on the plan. The corrections to the LEAF can be made at the Planning Board office. Please contact staff member Robert Kassner for any additional help you may need. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman CC: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector i SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM# : COMMENTS: V APR 2 I NOLD TOWN : ,� I BOARD R 1Vlatt Avi'MAJ7"-L-I Marina i 4 I i _. � P'.Box 1235-MattitU&,N.Y. 1052 516 298 4739 �. April 16, 1992 Town of Southold Planning Board P. O. Box 1179 Southold, N. Y. 11971 Attn: Board Members Dear Members I.. ' Please be advised that the clean up of debris on the South East end of our property has begun and should be finished sometime next week. Please feel free to inspect and in addition please let me know if any problems come up with the submitted site plans. Please find enclosed some receipts from local sanitation companys showing that our work is well underway. I am also going to be working with John Bredemeyer of the Trustees Board on ways to prevent any stormwater runoff. I will continue to keep you informed. Very truly yours Donald P. Cocks ,y�.. < , .... .. ,. .•i. .. ,. i :Y'. a ;'r',c?y�y'i — ,x,Y:.ri `'�� '-�'.— „t•,:Y+,, al"xtia. M STATEMENT f a (r Mattittuck Sanitation DIV.EAST END ECOLOGY LTD. P.O. DRAWER 1402 MATTITUCK.N.Y. 11952• !. _ . .....-..., .. ... .,...... .... :.:.._._..... PHONE(516)298.8888 -, JAN. FEB. ,MAR.- APR: MAY JUN. ,JUL. AUG. SEP: Lift NOV. DEC.-- Fr � 0. L 'CC1 CNA k vGA_ 141j? \\Q\5a . .�. �' -:.. _ -.,..- __•-=e ,-air,.; - e F' Service Rendered: � 4 (� Refuse removal( ) Roll-off container( ) aoo .00 Lo,C �I a0• �� " 3G �d& -�o rCI THANK YOU TOTAL_ _ `7 b WHITE.-OFFICE COPY YELLOW:.CUSTOMER COPY .,.....r t sW 1 OREGON RD. RECYCLING INC. M. V. LIC. # 7054858 ------------------------ P. O. BOX 300 INVOICE NUMB.F.R: 206 CUTCHOGUE. N. Y. 11935 ( 516 ) 734-701 4 DATE: APRIL 14 . 1992 INVOICE TO: MATT-A-MAR MARINA P. O. BOX 1235 MA.TTITUCK. N. Y. 11952. JOB: MATT-A-MAR MARINA WORK PERIOD: 4/1 /92 - 4/13/92 PAYMENT DUE: UPON NOTICE ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ----------------------------------------------=-------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 LOAD OF SCRAP METAL REMOVED $40 . 00. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUB-TOTAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $40 . 00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- TAX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3 . 20 ----------------=-------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLEA.SE PAY THIS AMOUNT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $43 . 20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- l p M, att7A" - Marmarina PO.Box.1235-Mattituck,N.Y. 1:1952 516 298=4739 l` s:AiV April 16, 1992 Town of Southold Planning Board P. O. Box 1179 Southold, N. Y. 11971 Attn: Board Members Dear Members Please be advised that the clean up of debris on the South East end of our property has begun and should be finished sometime nest week. Please feel free to inspect and in addition please let me know if any problems come up with the submitted site plans. Please find enclosed some receipts from local sanitation compahys showing that our work is well underway. I am also going to be working with John Bredemeyer of the Trustees Board on ways to prevent any stormwater runoff. I will continue to keep you informed. Very truly yours Donald P. Cocks .. ... _. •ice �' - .�,• , r , STATEMENT Mattituck Sanitation a 21111� DIV.EAST END ECOLOGY LTD. P.O. DRAWER 1402 MATTITUCK,N.Y. 11952 — PHONE(516)298.8888 JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN. JUL. AUG. SEP. OCT. NOV. DEC. - - Service Rendered: \ IIU I Jl1 C7� Refuse removal ( ) ecn� Roll-off container( ) aoo..00 LOC. � . . F� 1-1 ao: ,go � �c-M)C,m �Ue. f�1Gfi -fiuc.� 6r)n.<C I t�C�QS -�O r C I CGc1- () P ' J t SaorC L bwlo\�c, THANK YOU TOTAL WHITE-OFFICE COPY YELLOW-CUSTOMER COPY -" OREGON RD. RFCYCLING IN( M.V. LIC. it 7054858 P. O. BOX 300 - --------INVOICE NIiMBFR: 206 CUTCHO(.',IJE. N . Y. 11935 ( 516 ) 734-7014 DATE: APRIL 14 . 1992 INVOICE TO: MATT-A-MAR MARINA P.O. BOX 1235 MATTITUCK. N . Y. 11952 JOB: MATT-A-MAR MARINA WORK PERIOD: 4/1 /92 - 4/13/92 PAYMENT DUE: UPON NOTICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1 LOAD OF SCRAP METAL REMOVED $40 . 00. ------------------------------------------------ SUB-TOTAL.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $40 . 00 ---------------------------------- TAX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3 . 20 --------------------------------------------- --------------- ----------- FLEASF PAY `PHIS AMOUNT. . . . . . . . . . . . . $43 . 20 �oski FFOZIr�, o it PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS "� `: +• = SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman tf' �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �d Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold. New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 18, 1992 Donald Cocks, General Manager Matt-A-Mar Marina P.O. Box 1235 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: "As-Built" Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina. Mattituck, N.fY. SCTM# 1000-114-3-1 Dear Mr. Cocks: This letter will confirm your telephone conversation of March 11, 1992, with Robert Kassner of this office regarding the above referenced site plan. The Planning Board will no longer require an "as-built" plan, but will accept instead, an amended site plan. The amended plan should show .the proposed restaurant expansion in addition to the other conditions contained in the Board' s letter' to you of January 27, 1992 (copy enclosed) . If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr .yas Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector i -5 r X, 1 Matt A� ui :M�,arina P0:Box 4235-Mattitu'k,N Y 1;19 2 � 516 298 4739 3/9/92 Planning Board Town of Southold P. O. Box 1179 Southold N. Y. 11971 Re: Stormwater runoff3— Could you please examine the enclosed site plan and let me know your feelings on the proposed locations of 2 drywells for stormwater runoff. The drywell located at the North East corner of our building is existing but is without a .grate. By pitching the grade to this drywell, runoff from the parking area and road would be eliminated. The other drywell would be installed at the East end of our building. Once again we would pitch the existing grade to this proposed drywell and runoff from this area would be prevented from entering the creek on the South side of our property. I would like to know if any permits or approvals would be necessary and if this meets with your suggestions noted in your letter dated 1/27/92. Thank You Donald P. Cocks ��f J KPLAN R 1 21992 UTHOLD TOWN PJING BOARD f- .,ion '�I yy HIV 0 �TREES Nr E fft'pA � TREL \� .... ,,.. TREE r/1 4 TELE _ f �.�,, iELEhMONE' TREEU�Rnyu. �cI I,1 PARKING \ �W > TREE gI ) \ �T 3doo9�t DIRT 8 GRA VkhL Ol MARINA fI.A/3.& [flG /y97bI�IDWA>�TANG CI i `)30009e,/e. MIDDLE. • — TL1p!`VL \ tIjlQ COT TAOE o © SECURITY t OFFICE PAlKING� I �� FR.BLOO / N on ', i IPROX G q A V .L ,,,,� I RO A J�cP Slo 1 A A .. `7� \ tbr" CAFE uloxalrwnrfrc' a Pfra3E .� N.Y T I • 19 Z ( ttm 1tAN PARKING GaAD zoo' E3f9Tne ova 3 , Lfr Q LPFtNf eoAr 14• { ./ a �� 6 U I L D I N G N - 1 1! It 'DAY Lo6LLL r ,_ b FIN.FLR. EL. II.S _ a e �•, �.' GYVY,RFI.L 'I O' I, � � . Sq. rlNb -, :, .bRdVEL c' AREA `, ! `,; •j� ;r . l _. ,�. /� � �� Id�. 1 BOAT 'bAR VINO } �• Z � .�-- 1 -✓, ' LIANT PO4E_ �. ��. . Nam: •`��`1.�;:,' __ N ��_ --r'_� --� . Ap,pROI(1MATE §HC)RtL'INE HIGH WATER MARK . � NEdOfI K CREEK - . NOTE: SITE PLAN IN' WtC-V4+4rn Ave SITE PLAN B+ ACTUAL FIELI . m�rrir�e;� ( . CONTOUR L ARIA=1!.15 ACRE$+ REFERENCE GAS.? DIE:. GAS 10,c DIESEL 6,1 : REVISION DEC. 26,1991 I is ., . REVISION DEC. 10,1991 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ' r ,K SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward '�}� ��, - Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald `ram" '} P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING. BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 27, 1992 Donald Cocks, General Manager Matt—A—Mar Marina P.O.Box 1235 Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: "As-Built" Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM * 1000-114-3-1 Dear Mr. Cocks: Pursuant to the Planning Board' s field inspection on January 10th, the revised site plan has been reviewed. It appears to be acceptable for an "as-built" with a few exceptions, which are noted here. First, the proposed addition to the restaurant should be removed from the "as-built" plan. As discussed in the field, that addition is properly the subject of a future application to amend the "as-built" site plan. ( Please note that at the time you make the application for an amendment, the site plan will have to be drawn to the 1" equals 20' scale. The "as-built" map was drawn at the 1" equals 50' scale; and while we are accepting it for "as-built" purposes, but we will not be able to accept it with the application for an amendment. ) Second, the row of black pines alongside the southerly retaining wall/bulkhead should be supplemented with plantings that provide more screening for the residences located to the south of the marina. It appears that you have about 15 to 20 feet of depth to work with adjacent to the black pines, without interfering with your need to manuever around the building. Please submit a landscape plan that covers the property' s southernmost shoreline from the front landscaping area on Wickham Avenue to the westerly end of the row of Japanese pines. The use of salt-tolerant species of plants such as Little Leaf Linden and Red Cedars is recommended. Lastly, during the last rainstorm on Friday, the 24th, it was noted that the stormwater runoff from -the parking area on the northeastern side of the new storage building is causing erosion downgradient to the east of the building. In order to prevent this stormwater from causing erosion and ultimately continuing southward directly into the creek, we would like to see your proposal for dealing with this problem. We are open to a combination of methods such as minor regrading, the creation of swales or shallow retention (ponding) areas, and the installation of leaching basins in the parking area. If any further questions should arise about how to proceed with either the "as-built" plan or the proposed amendment, please do not hesitate to speak with Valerie Scopaz . Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS w, `:: �, SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ' Richard G. Ward " ;'t� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road �� �. Mark S. McDonald � "�`� P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Febrtadry 21, 1992 Donald Cocks, General Manager Matt-A-Mar Marina P.O.Box 1235 Mattituck, New York 11952 Re- "As-Built" Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM A 1000-114-3-1 Dear Mr. Cocks: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter of February 10, 1992 in which you outlined your plans to comply with the items noted in my letter to you of January 27 , 1992. With regard resolving the drainage and erosion problem, iwel) t:wo_u-1-d:appreciate-rec-e-ivin_g-a copy-of-your-pla-ns before -you-st-art work in_ o-r-de-r—to--give--our-engineering=inspector - a cha-nce-to tr-eview=t-hem-. When you submit the "as`-built" site and `� 'andscaping'-fD:a , it should reflect whatever changes are agreed to. Thank you for your cooperation. I look forward to hearing from you soon with regard to the drainage situation. If any questions should arise, please do not hesitate to contact the office. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman a ~� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald rtz�` P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-l 823 FebrUdry 21, 1992 Donald Cocks, General Manager Matt—A—Mar Marina P.O.Box 1235 Mattituck, New York 11952 Re; "As-Built" Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM # 1000-114-3-1 Dear Mr. Cocks: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter of February 10, 1992 in which you outlined your plans to comply with the. items noted in my letter to you of January 27 , 1992. With regard ,resolving the drainage and erosion problem, we would appreciate receiving a copy of your plans before you start � work in order to give our engineering inspector a chance to review them. When you submit the "as-built" site and / landscaping plan, it should reflect whatever changes are agreed / to. Thank you for your cooperation. I look forward to hearing from you soon with regard to the drainage situation. If any questions should arise, please do not hesitate to contact the office. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman j �..� .Y a. 1Flti 1.1C1 Marina; /eK PO.Box 1�235-Mattituck,N Y. 11952-�" 516 298-4739 ✓ '� � i February 10, 1992 Town of Southold Planning Board P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Att : Board Members Gentlemen: I would once again like to thank board members B. Orlowski, G. Latham and M. Mc Donald for the inspection that took place on Jan. 10, 1992. As per our conversations on that day and the subsequent letter dated Jan. 27, 1992, Matt-A-Mar agreed to fulfill, in good faith, the items discussed. This includes the landscaping of our eastern boundary along Wickham Avenue. The project should, hopefully begin this spring, barring any economic downfall. As for our southern boundry along the -retaing wall, as needed, we will replace diseased Japanese Black Pines with your suggested Red Cedar or possibly Colorado Blue Spruces. The runoff problem as described in your letter has been a problem that we have been working on. The winter months with the ground being frozen has added to the erosion problem. Our options for control of this stormwater runoff include grading, then the addition of a road grate to an existing dry well located at the North East corner of our storage building. At the East end we plan on a combination of grading, seeding and possibly some asphalt work to direct the runoff to a drywell that we propose be located at the South East corner of our property. i FEB 1 2 19T SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD We are also making headway on the clean up of wood and metals on the South side of our building. We are currently waiting for Oak Street Recycling to pick up our scrap metal. Once again thank you. Very truly yours, Donald P. Cocks General Manager L SITE PLAN Presub mission conference (within 30 days of written request) Complete application receivedr (within 4 months of presub. conference) I Application reviewed at work session "LO` (within 10 days of receipt) Applicant advised of necessary revisions " _Q �r z (within 30 days of review) D i Revised sub mission received � � "zb Lm.„ ox Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination -3o o REFERRED TO: 0 U z F, Zoning Board of Appeals o N (written comments within 60 days of request) F. I ►,ja Board of Trustees w am7L V � • IMFV. OK o v'Building Department (certification)A6 a- w a 9 OCK n w ------------- Suffolk County Department of Planning I .` oK c&R \ x Department of Transportation -State ,W,` oK z C> Department of Transportation - County %G��� (do"I Suffolk County Dept, of HealthWM ^y Fire Commissioners o I oK Y� �drl ,. missioners Sent: x Received- N RECEIVED: Draft Covenants and Restrictions ,ro.` oK Filed Covenants and Restrictions Landscape plan L Ixro. oK Lighting plan WTI • IMFb, oK Curb Cut approval � s Wl` ftealth approval Drainage plan � Reviewed by Engineer Iro.` El LY di tst f ' Approval of site plan -with conditions ' Endorsement of site'plan • alt Certificate of Occupancy inspection ACUL Inro. OK �� ,,•r �,,, dne year review Ink 14-16-2 2187)-7c ( 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review _ . FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a pr or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Freq ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that who deter significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environm, analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affe the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determina process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or act Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic prof data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provide guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 317 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. - ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not;be a.significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will he prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions In wff /y 4A., Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer ( 5ibnature..of.Responsible-0fficer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date _ 1 CART 1—PROJECT INFORMX' N Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application fora Y have a significant effect approval and may be subject to.further verification and public review. Provide any additions! information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will.be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION The.addition to existing restaurant to include handicap bathrooms LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Matt-A-Mar marina Wickham Aye. P.O. Box 1235 Ma.ttituck, L.I.. . 11952 NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Ettore Pennacchia P (Sff9 WPMADDRESS 49 Maplewood Ave. Selden, N.Y. 11784 or C/O Matt-A-Mar P.O. Box 1235, Mattituck L.I. CITY/PO Selden {?T 2f CM NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Ali Agarab ADDRESS ( 516) 298 4739 306 Prospect Ave. CITY/PO Sea Cliff, STATE Z CODE N.Y. [1579 i DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The addition ,to a existing building ( approx. 48' X 43" for the use of food prep. storage space, equipment such as heating system, hot water boiler and plumbing, ' frezzers and refridgerators, and 2 handicap bathrooms as per Suffolk County Health Dept. directive. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description, Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) Mural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other Res—,Aaaatir I/� AC 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE •PADPEATY fo A"6s PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) `f acres H _acres Forested I acres I acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) O acres O acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) I acres I acres Water Surface Area 5 t�'I acres 5 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces `j acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? - 'roP Sort_ 56tiO a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained 9 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified ret .4_0"00 the NYS Land Classification System? O acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes EKNo a. What is depth to bedrock? O (in feet) _ I992 2 SOiITHOLD TOVVN `''"` PLANNING BOARD 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town; Village Board ❑Yes IXNo City, Town, Village Planning Board lZYes ❑No APPuCATJ0IJ City, Town Zoning Board ®Yes ❑No Anguc-o-rto0 City, County Health Department ®Yes ❑No Other Local Agencies ®Yes ❑No 60IL wG KEPT Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ZNo State Agencies ❑Yes XNo Federal Agencies ❑Yes ZNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®•Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision Msite plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? M 2. t'ti ORINA , R'S780EANI� 4C)u_cE 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? SAn'IG (AS gJ3c>ve 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? I,UE Coup-D ADD I-D CXjST'►NC, eU1LOfMG-1-' A- 94c)-re .-/VUGn5L i 4C)OSE C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ( Yes - ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? R es 11)eLJ-n A-L_ 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/4 mile? Wes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? J4Yes ❑No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? XYes �i,�No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Ayes []No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes VINo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ApplicantJS e�r Name Date z_!; 1 9a Signature �i � Title LI G If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Part ?—PROJECT IMPACTS AND THE'" MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be ?` Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO' BYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑Yes QNo foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑Yes ®No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑Yes [XN6 • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ® ❑ DYes ONo 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ El Yes ®No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑Yes RNo tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ® ❑ El Yes ®No • Construction in a designated floodway. ® ❑ ❑Yes allo • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 2. Will there be an effect t.,. ...jy unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)IXNO DYES • Specific land .forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 6 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON_r.WATER. .} . : Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ,ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. 9 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? XNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? XNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not N ❑ El Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 I ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water V� ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per EJ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likelv cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in.areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? XNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can ImpacJBy Moderate Large ''Mitigated Impact Impact Project Cha • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ON OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ,ONO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? gNO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ El Yes []No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? IAINO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 2 3 Small to" Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes El No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ❑NO ❑YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ El Yes El No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N6 project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO ❑YES • Tile permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 9 l IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 2 3 Small 'to Potential ,Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ONO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 f • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ El Yes El No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. ry • Odors will occur routine) (more than one hour per day).d p y)• ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑NO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 10 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD = Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact . Project Change P(NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑Yes [�'No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑Yes No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑Yes E�No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑Yes ONo • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑Yes �gNo or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑Yes ZNo (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑Yes F911 LN No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. )N ❑ ❑Yes MNo • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? XNO ❑YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11. 14.14.1 1 I2!87)-9c 617.21 S EQ R Appendix B tate Environmental Quality Review „ 'Ifisual EAJF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-3 3-5 5+ A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other. outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes ❑No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within r *'/a mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural% ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *'/z mile El Yes El No *1 miles El Yes ❑No *2 miles El Yes El No *3 miles El Yes ❑No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ E 2 tp " S Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application 1//U J -Filing Fee Date Rec' d New Use Change of Use Re-Use Extension of Existing Use 4-- Revision of an Approved Site Plan (Date .of Apprpval ) Other Specify Name of Business or Site 70U.4 of Ur Al l c.,F— Location of Site Ph w--P7'/Tcr c-h Address of Site, if available Po / a-�,S" (yc c_ Name of Applicant 1-7-0&, P,_47 l_,iv n-oc Ff!A9 Address of Applicant liq M A p Lit,,o o b L b fig Al Telephone c�k - 4, L10 3 Person to be responsible for Construction Telephone Applicant' s interest in site-check one: Owner of Land Under contract 'to purchase__ Owner of Fee Title to Land AL/ A-- A--R- r-+-- /5 J Address p0 / 2 3S Telephone a2.5p Y? 35 Site Plans Prepared by p0e o►U1 L SU;^t,d License No. yq �is- Address Pp Qom 9aw7 d, NuLi�_Telephone 966-- Saar --------------- Total Land Area of Site Sq.Ft. Zone District Existing Use of Site I2�s ju 2�a�`T" Proposed Use of Site Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure( s) /67vo sqft. sqft. Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) /may -sqft. sqf t. Percent .of Lot Coverage by Building( s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) o Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) o Datum(Specify)U.S.G.S. Other Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site. Y� U If so, have proper permits been obtained? / Number and Date of permit issued NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAT, OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD. l 14-16-4(2187)—Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 SEOR Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME A6 1 - f11A f�j- (YIAR IYIARINV�) Ri✓STPLUF�14N1- S�A�G Sti'ST6d�-l_ 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality '(OWK) County SU I✓f=10L(� 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks,etc.,or provide map) MAr i^ Q- rn,cJ rnA Rl+�r9 I /y rnI l e nor+h fcOYI r I n k erse�+Ion o-F P.o2 LiCKitKrn RVC- SOVND qdE , g. rn0-r-r(Tuc-K L _, 0.`(. 11959 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: ❑New ❑Expansion Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: /(he a4cli-hon ©F eo_ss foci ar,,d/or cJresse �-Ca(� -fo �xls4-I n5 s� si em 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially p I acres Ultimately ® � acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? 0Yes ❑No If No,describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ❑Residential ❑Industrial RrCommercial ❑Agriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open space ❑Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? QYes ❑No If yes, list agency(s)and permit/approvals Sv rFo l k Co. L7e p+. mF' 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? QrYes ❑No If yes, list agency name and permit/approval Sv��ol k Co . DvpI . c>r I-Iea I�h 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes ❑No O-,S 16Cf--- I CERTIFY THAT TH��E INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE / Applicantlsponso me: �1-.I_ f�G A RAC i 1Yl(1 r f- A n 1612 rYIA RI f� Date: Signature: ` If the action is in oastal Area; and you are a state agency, complete the Coa ssessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II—ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAR , ❑Yes ❑No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. ❑Yes ❑No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural, archaeological, historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly. C5. Growth,subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes,explain briefly PART III—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on.the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 2 487)—T—ext 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 SEOR Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 1 2. PROJECT NAME-7 > " U IZ fG ��h/G¢.0 CIT /U tc_4 vi- 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality A i t TU C . County 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks,etc.,or provide map) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: ❑New W Expansion ❑Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECt BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres " Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? Yes ❑No If No,describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ❑Residential ❑Industrial ElCommercial ❑Agriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open space ❑Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ®-yes ❑No If yes, list agency(s)and permit/approvals j� j'T & �. 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY.VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑Yes @Q No If yes,list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes Q No �T I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: rT7 a /L 0, Av A-C Ch I Date: 2 11 Signature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II—ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) ` A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. ❑Yes ❑No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another Involved agency. ❑Yes ❑No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological, historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05?Explain briefly.- C7. Other Impacts(including changes In use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes,explain briefly PART III—DETERMINATION OF.SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed In connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL•EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ❑ Check this box if you have' determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, theTreasons supporting this determination: Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsib a Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible officer) Date 2 r' APPLICANT' S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLL�K i1"jE -)-4 -C°- t being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at H2 M, A-,r2t IN /Y-via in the State of New York, and that he is the ,owner of ,the above property, or that he is the I-F,16_9 ir-9 of the (Title) ( Specify whether Partnership which is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Signedtlhu a (Owner) Sworn to before me this �7 da of1A 19 (Notary Public) Signed On r' v^'y-go"8�f"k _ (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) APR - S01iTN0LD?ovd,� PLANNNIG 6011 'D Iro i %Atl 5 / i C ` rYOC /0-09 Ey � corms ?O'rw..v ziM%x / •� � W /MtE r^fr7-�----u ,e• ro onr<.vT P°°t �G� � Ql One v bo / \ , O11 COin �\ I rOQ Vj F / \ WOODED $ c'\ cv \� F•f �._�r L A N D a0 F B A K E R ) �`'`� 100 # / •� , / / P / AREA NN cca.°N d a� CIOKEY Pp P z2 z. i —.. ar,�k�,« \ _ MAPNC I M... 2' \ \ SCALE I" 600 ' S1IVITARY LEACHING I/ / ' ' N 65 05' 40" E. f NOT TO SCALE 03' J sR't . ° 215. I Y 22 TREES \OG IL© W �O. _ . I LILCO / �A.O,AEPI REf5-5 .,L... /\ D? p0 TREE Im GROUND WATER MANA GEMENT ZONE IV O P ,A f�m5 ,•: I vg `(` TREE C A��, \ Cr O / / / / TREE 0�El rb�N L �E L E P N _ ' o. \ \ I I 8.75' acres . x 300 d./acre = 2625 d. EE T , c g.p• gp• ° / .r / / TREE F F <E' TRES J � � OUO .ti. ° m r r / / / ( d TREE `G P .TREE /I ) P H K i N G N A \ \ �\ `� �+r BOAT STORAGE BUILDING / 9P c / \ I STORE, OFFICE 9 SECURITY OFFICE I / / 4 x c '` 3790 sq./l x 0.06 = 227 . .d. / TREE TREE TREE D l R T .�, G R A V L\L , O EXISTING RESTAURANT 55seals l0 s 52 9 p.d. � TREE c'Riy f,� 9 �Pg�i? P x TREE %BAR 5 sedisx l0 g p.d - 50 g p.d / / A PLW / BOA T SLIPS 9/ s/I s x l0 . .a. g•P• TREE / 13 b 4 ys/ 14GROEOV WATER TAA" � ~� Ih N g.-p d MIDDLE P 9 P 9/0 d.,TR E COTTAGE I- C? VEiC3 � � i TREE TREE •�•S • Fk.sf.� 8 1 _ L p ' ✓yam rldCe Ap. SECURITY �� G /8 •�ZZ37 g.p.d �< THEE TREE f OFFI CE � l �A'es e'er �e / PARKING TREE © TREE • i3e+o P FR. BLDG TtEE' TREE TREE r / - ( W PGAS UMP CC C TREE TREE ` �� DRY t a DESIGN RES TA URA T C3. / TEe�rC ( \!. P NC _ _ - _ — —-- -- Elf Tp.G L SLAB - s - - - ' .' / 40FC EOHON f FR TREE ` , , . 2 ' ` G R Q N E•L RO A D • w �....ROOF P. � EX/STING 55 S@a1S 30 g.p.S. l 50 In yp.d TREE e�oG TANKS ^- QJ . -- DrQAtst -�, ttti . �- /��� 5 bar seats N g.p.5" 9P•d ' SH/pS ��C� D� •> •1 EMf CEDAR C E i A R FE, t IroEROROUNo ELE'CTAElI: 3 PHASE •� ', �� �I V f to \l I 7�` Q I # © STO O fREE RF/ Q \ " ` •� F OFFICE E RKNG / .LI EC -— - ;------ _T. S_ MN PARKA =-- - / '�,� �` i� Y NEW ES TRO MS ONLY I pTrTE . � ;. o ^. _ — -- -- - -- ---- : ADDITION `F R O / \ Ts OP — �~� 200' - 1'T '� ' z UTILIZE THE' EXISTING SANITARY SYSTEM $ `�••"TREE 4 i • \• . • ; -iJ $H /' -r=- ----' - --- —_ - --'——._._ ti 'L11 CO •, i' -'✓.' -�' O raar.•r! .r:ro.,. .., �.,:..._, ,..�^_,•_-w•"1'' - / TREE z TREE ! GAS METER . rS+L`r1">......��•ru.• �x pools low J ADD 2 8'� x ,/2 V.F.V Deep leaching ( overl _ . ! . / "'ILKOUNTY ... r��.r•,t1 Vf �SEALTH SERVICES AGE S# APPRO-ED FOR COSTRUCT#ON ONLY �e DRY WELL I ` \'RE' :'- pRAGE CON CONTA Eh9STWG I TREE . r P FOR / Go- 1 Q d l I I ' : o s / , RooF BOA T / o_ H.S. REf. NO. 1 ........_.FL W�• 0 , R\ - { E LONT- / r . ` ORAWAZaE. r _mot m STORAGE STORAGE �:' 1 . . , ►- TYPE �q01 SoaAL Rr�"2� S�t ha?SS6tmot �.4_._..�.. 1 I TREE TR E �\,. • - WALL ��� r { a ® U I L D I N G ----- -- - Q -' /L �- _ r- U. RETAWMG r.J i N Q ` ( I TREE / •+ \ _ 'WOOD ,1 /J - , J = N FIN.FLR. = EL. II.S ! - __ This approval Isrpranled i^r the construction of ttxl sanitary I - I •_li _ r Oispc•�l�r+c! vrat r sLe p#v`. jji ces pun scant to Articles V9 and + • ,' . - ' ` , - Dr <- .,,.r+�,:. a f t# , S f`oi' N I;�'r =� •, .;r:n�r�! Is nOt an expressed f� 3 N nor ilnpbI d sPara.*l a , imm, or o�'crpy the structU ep S)Crr:1. Tt ! r ,} (2)YEARS k r _ W W r it .A�� ;c'V>�t IrPiRcS��++T,ri�,tl..� b t , '• . - ; ' . . _ `t DRY'WC.- WY h FROM THE DATE SELO` � ' .a/. t,��C1► 1 '"j O N - 1 l X T1V MAY 19 1992 � F O R /�' .- _ i _ WELL _ 200 £!S V _ i:+rrr. - - M A P ' I p 1 N 1 N° i �' s► '�'' -L , •' FOR EMYNG `/ - - - R�K4mo" nl n' r' ��T -� SIGNATURE / R E T ROOF O �� OR.0 O 1 MATT A MAR MARINA , INC . v I ` L r _ I G GRAVEL AREA EXI ST N O 1 0 ` 1 ti / tip / - IAVERGTOLIVD ELECTfR! - _ 1 BOAT A 7 PARKING N G ° q!wa° »I Y A T 1`1 ` P �10 �'•s I, � A T T t -- -� - 8 -r- --- _ �.— - _ LILCO Q APPROVAL CY�.��. : DMUS t.'%TERW S, r-�� X-:QA7 01 I T U C It 3 PNASF_ LWE ��� IT-5S �,\ rtOP�pO� D3 €� ��� � T - ,� _ TOWN 01' S O UT H O L D SUFFOL K COUNTY , N . Y. 1000 - 114 - 03 - 01 I \ _ / ' 1 I • APPROXIMATE SHORELINE HIGH W TEF iMRK Q SCALE 1 - 50� pI,P E 4 Cn F p j / ,?ow o{ Jcz�ct/)c's F G^i z... t P :e (Oe T t' _ {o be -eploce,- ) HEADWA ,}#)t`? .. FE S. 22 ,�1989 . MAR . 21 , 1989 ELEC • Pp0 ` � L K"�p° / � f� A T T I T U C K C R � Gc I� ~ SOUTHO�D T0�^.�N FEB, 6, 1992 (Sanitary Design 1 ev / PLANNIha BOARD MAR. 1992 (a dd i�roq s 1 ' DOCK NOTE: ON FROM FIELD, OFF-ICE P�,�G \ ACTUAL FIELD SITE PLAN BY SDATA,AND OFFICTEVEN J. E INFORMAT►NEC. 1986 r am, Z,- CONTOUR LINES AND ELEVATIONS ARE a N.Y. S. L I C. N 0. 49618 AREA. 8.75 A CRESY REFERENCED TO NGVD. GAS 8 DIES E' TAKKS §4 )' GAS 10,060 GAL. E00141�,'•-SUR•VE OoS , P. C. _ DIESEL 6,000 GAL. �. ,• .PEY.3IONS AP/1 iL 3,/aJ92 R P.0. V00N DEC. 26,1991 �OX��9'~C�9� MAIN ROAD REWSION DEC. 10,1991 SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 /11241/9/ D. K. Y 88 726