The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-35.-1-25 i ' / _ { ! � ~ � � Young, Land Surveyors '00 Avenue, Riverhead, New York f f 90 f 516-727-2303 NEW FRAME GAZEBO Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor ohn Schnurr, Land Surveyor 1. THE TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP WAS DEVELOPED UTILIZING A COMBINATION OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC AND CONVENTIONAL FIELD SURVEYING TECHNIQUES. THE FIELD SURVEYING WAS COMPLETED BY US IN APRIL 1997. THE AERIAL BASED ON GROUND CONTROL SURVEY FURNISHED BY US AND PHOTOGRAPHY DATED FEB. 20, 1997. 2. FIRM ZONE LINES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FLOOD INSURANCE �tPLMASOFW M'-TANW RATE MAP PANEL No. 360813 0058 D LAST REVISED APRIL 17, 6 1985. r�OF WALL XOO 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SPECIFICATIONS. 4. PEDESTRIAN PATHS SHALL BE WOOD CHIPS OR STABILIZED WALL NO 11 tp SC 4" AME GAZEBO 5. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. (MSL 1929), �EW FR 38 LEGEND: 37 a-Soo 941 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 19.00 lot T EXISTING CONTOURS 0 33 PROPOSED CONTOURS -----33 V FF EXISTING BRUSH LINE EXISTING WOODS LINE WOODS TO REMAIN 14* NEW 8" WATER MAIN INETLANDS (Dal EXISTING NEW 5" WATER HAIN --E VAj 0� WETLANDS NEW 6" FIRE LINE -6'FL r, NOTES NEW A" WATER SERVICE -4.INS 1. ALL PEDESTRIAN PATHS WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE rr WETLANDS SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 FEET IN WIDTH 75 WATER VALVE AND SHALL BE SURFACED WITH WOOD CHIPS AND/OR OTHER SURFACE MATERIAL APPRO�SD BY THE N.Y.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT NEW PEDESTRIAN--PATH 2. ALL BARE EARTH ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED NEW FIRE HYDRANT WOOD CHIP PEDESTRIAN PATHS WITHIN 100 FEET OF WETLANDS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH WILDFLOWER MIX. JEFFREY SEEMAN OF COAST VIRIZEN TA NEW ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, ETC&G AND APPROVED BY NYSDEC ON 4-7-98. SH EET 4- OF 1 CABLE GAS MAIN sr'm I I? I 'I I __ - W !I SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT 01:MEALT14 SERVICES NEW FRAME 27 %A NEW SIILT FENCE & HAY BAILES 'r SHEET 5 OF 13 APPROVED MR 00%T�Tlou MLY NEW STREET LIGHT GAZEBO FIF O`�.00 TO BE SE IN PLACE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION et. ACnVITY KS.RERNO. EXISTING CATCH BASINS NEW CATCH BASIN 2x4 CURB INLET 8 NEW CATCH BASIN 2x4 FLUSH GRATE = NEW ASP PAR d4me M,rmt-Ar T4*facr-em maw taftdW V8&1d .1 (RECREATION PARKW38 CAPS) FIETAPNING 7 ct ft Smbq Cod",am 1:m m mpmmd NEW CATCH BASIN 2x2 FLUSH GRATE = On VAL. REE, 0 TREE WITH SIZE & SPECIES YEARS FM3 THE 1b 24 21 01 EL-41M JULP 9 1,011 117 1pt 10 HIGH DENSITY POLY-ETHYLENE PIPE HDPE X POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE PVC r-J. CAST IRON PIPE C1 NEW ALT KING AR 3 &V." NEW TRASH STRUCTURE ABBREVIATION IS AFF PARKIN 4 CARS) 0 PICK-UP AREA OLD STRUCTURE NUMBER 0 SUB-STRUCTURE f WPM 0 FF:� NC8 1.03.1 T = TOP OF STRUCTURE 3&06 1A 0 STRUCTURE ABBREVIATIONS 0 NCB NEW STORM SEWER CATCH BASI NEW STORM SEWER MANHOLE NMH 0 NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NSMH 0 A200 0 SITE DATA: AREA OF SCENIC EASEMENT NEW FIRE LAKE (SOUTH) 1,386,122 S.F. OR 31.8210 ACRES a 266,085 S.F. OR 6.1085 ACRES ff X/ TOTAL 1,652,207 S.F. OR 37.9295 ACRES EXISTnIN T ORI\S AREA OF BUILDINGS ,..HAL WETLANDS Lm OF 26,225 S.F. OR 0.60 ACRES NEW SILT HAY SMILES (TO BE REMOVED) -14,100 S.F. OR -0.32 ACRES NOTE C41 FRESHWATER WETLAND TOTAL (NET) 398,921 S.F. OR 9.16 ACRES BOUNDARY AS FLAGGED BY ENVIRONMENTAL CORP AND o. ff APPROVED BY NYSOEb ON PERCENT LOT COVERAGE 9.16 144.7708 6.33% NEW RKING AR PERCENT LANDSCAPED 0 APPROXIMATE AREAS IN ACRES NEW POND N NSW ASp,ALT DRIVE WAR SURFLC EL-15. LINE CCZI'5� Y PRESENT AFTER COMPLETION MEADOW AND BRUSHLINE 74.0 51.3 FOREST (WOODED) 49.3 36.9 AGRICULTURAL 0.0 0.0 NEW ROCK DAM NO,2 FRESHWATER WETLANDS 2.8 4.9 (f UNVEGETATED EARTH 12.4 4.7 BUILDINGS 0.6 9.2 PAVED SURFACES 0.1 12.1 LAWNS AND LANDSCAPING 4.8 28.4 PARKING SHEET 4 OF 13 0 REQUIRED NEW M RUAINIM SHEET 3 OF 13 MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING GROUND WATER EL-3.00* BEDROOM 17 x 2.25 = 39 HEALTH CENTER 0 0�,AG SKILLED CARE CENTER BEDS 32 0 1 = 32 ONO NO, 0 TOTAL C'tc.�COMPAL TED CLAY PROVIDED POND/WETLAND & BIOFILTRA-nON SYSIE 135 CAR GARAGE @ APARTMENT BUILDING = 133 (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR UST OF PLANTS) E)(IISTING PUBLJC PARKING AREA No.1 GUEST/DINING & FACILITY = 52 No.2 GUEST = 25 WATER SUPPLY FACIUTY � NEW ROCK DAM KIM WA R�C No.4 RECREATION UN COMPACTED E-4-66 T L OR CLAY TOTAL DATUM NGVD (MSL 1929) "I" WITOF NEW 0 rJ I <= I==- ,n., r-.Q WETLANDS PECONIC LANDING DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER 0' MIN. TO 50' MAX. NEW POND NO, 5 IVAT S EL 1100 T Svu 111 OLD EIR 'VP A LIN NPACTED X TOPSOIL OR CLAY R-80 ED U S RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES THE GEORGETOWN BUILDING RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY 101 CHESLEY DRIVE MEDIA, PA 19063-1761 NEW SANITARY SEWER FR--801 PUMP STATION 24�* RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY 117 4.400 APPLICANT- CIO U S RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES 7- ON BEHALF OF PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. THE GEORGETOWN BUILDING EDIA. PA 19063-1761 0 �ESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY 7_ LIFE CARE COMMUNITY BRECKNOCK HALL. ITS ASSOCIATED GARAGE&GRMHOL)S& AND THE LARGE WOOD FRAME BARN VALL BE RETANM IN FR 40 ACCORDANCE WITH THE OFFICE OF PARKS.RECREATION 7 RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY %�-TO BE REMOVED HISTORIC PRESERVATICK PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD � LOW RESIDENTIALDENSITY TO BE REMOVED At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York TO BE REMOVIED z District Section Block Lot TO BE REMOVED 2 W :E: NERAL LAYOU7 , GREEN 98T.FIRE DISTRICT z NE L O C� ATI ON M A P W. TO BE REMOVED ANDO 7N, (CF Ni� NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK CO NOV. 24, 1998 MAIN ROAD CURB�� AUG. 24, 1998 ( N . Y. S. RTE- 25) NEW CONCRETE SEP 15 ZUUU JUNE 29. 1998 MAY 14: 1998 SHEET 8 OF 13 te SEPT. 17, 1997 DATE SEPT. 4, 1997 74D 94 JOB NO. :97-0290 � ^070290_up-101^ OF 13 O Young, Land Surveyors / r,,¢venue, Riverhead, New York 11901 / 516-727-2303 = NEW FRAME GAZEBO i Alden W Young, P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) • Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor O / Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer Manning .-- ngTurrring Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor John Schnurr, Land Surveyor Ifiurnrying (1► / N NOTES: i / 1. THE TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP WAS DEVELOPED UTILIZING A i - i COMBINATION OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC AND CONVENTIONAL FIELD SURVEYING TECHNIQUES. THE FIELD SURVEYING WAS ' COMPLETED BY US IN APRIL 1997. THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY WAS PREPARED BY GEOMAPS INTERNATIONAL BASED ON GROUND CONTROL SURVEY FURNISHED BY US AND V -- Irmo, PHOTOGRAPHY DATED FEB. 20, 1997. 2. FIRM ZONE LINES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL No, 360813 0058 D LAST REVISED APRIL 17, m XP Of WAU 30.00 a 1985. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF - Z aSOUTHOLD SPECIFICATIONS. ff TOP a 30.00 •', N " ASPHALT OR,vE ® 4. PEDESTRIAN PATHS SHALL BE WOOD CHIPS OR STABILIZED _NEW FRAME GAZEBO ° gEll, 5. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. (MSL 1929). - / �, e a _ LEGEND: 36 37 rF 0 ooyy3 // .8 �p £ �� $N EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION = / A e4 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION = * 19.00 0 f ; EXISTING CONTOURS 33 -- ' sINA PROPOSED CONTOURS - 33 �76 , � w�� EXISTING BRUSH LINE ,- // TOP OF WALL-XOO qo Fug .a a� o g EXISTING WOODS LINE � WOODS TO REMAIN '�.� i $ J' ,3�o3mA( �X31.00 = - -- - --- / O J 7s - / ar�`d EXISTING GAS MAIN - - - - GM - - / EXISTING WATER MAIN = - WM - MIT// WETLANDS em NEW 8" WATER MAIN = 8 WM - EXISTING a �S* NEW 6" WATER MAIN - i �" / NEW 6" FIRE LINE - '�` 0% NOTES WETLANDS - 6-FL O ��-00 FF i. ALL PEDESTRIAN PATHS WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE ,smM WETLANDS SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 FEET IN WIDTH + r 'g WAWTER" : VALVE SERVICE a` AND SHALL BE SURFACED WITH WOOD CHIPS 6 \\ ,sem ..' �d AND/OR OTHER SURFACE MATERIAL APPROVED BY t+ - s2� THE N.Y.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ,sem 200EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT = CONSERVATION. .,_ .X NMPEDESTRIlW'PATH 2. ALL BARE EARTH ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED NEW FIRE HYDRANT Y` // ,q WOOD CHIP PEDESTRIAN PATHS WITHIN FLO FEET X. t e p• � WETLANDS SHALL BE SEEDED VM1H WILDFLOWER MIX. hhh 8 �. FRESHWATER WETLAND BOUNDARY M FLAGGED To BE R VEo qtr O NEW ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, - ETC&G SHEET O F 1 3 - BY JEFFREY SEEMAN OF COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SHEET 7 O F 1 3 CABLE & GAS MAIN R RP. AND APPROVED BY NYSDEC ON 4-7-98. tiBST 8 SHEET 4 O F 1 �---- - ° i stwuc counlrr oEPAanulr oI` N`g�.'yj.��Sp�y'E 1 27 q , \ �"�8 N TH w I CE) T NEyI► SILT FENCE dt HAY BAILES ooSHEET 5 O �I 3 / AO�/��`/7��j ^'� Yz ^a`L/T��N��` V�C�$ NEW STREET LIGHT V/►(t,�/ FF n,-40.00 "F W A � Tb eE SET IN PLACE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUC11ON s � rVFi� J i iO7>•\JL\i.� c o 2 a i sxf a.�e ACIIVITY j* 3ry ° EXISTING CATCH BASINS = TYPE ez C/ C NEW CATCH BASIN - 2x4 CURB INLET - ' rv l This $S tn• the wnftsooa ffi ! swfty �$ a dINi�06Nl�S1!��',.;;ttCr ,r, NEW CATCH BASIN - 2x4 FLUSH GRATE 0R1vE _ °� NEW P o'4 c F {� `� O NEW CATCH BASIN - 2x2 FLUSH GRATE _ P (RECREATION PARKING-3L CARS) .:, O 7 of ft W-r A CeL, �CC� A b PSP w' w s / «c ° � THE ID TREE WITH SIZE & SPECIES = 5 ^^ 98 ° iii tr >� ,, , ` y No= 3j� 24 a sc '� L�JtT -• , HIGH DENSITY POLY-ETHYLENE PIPE = YHDPE Q-61.00 ^'R-•1.0p �'� p �. / �QeB ♦ e POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE = PVC AR Zd ;• � r,5. ♦ CAST IRON PIPE _ LIM 1 ...... . ... CI ' Imo" STRUCTURE ABBREVIATION NEW ALT NG 3 � ' r P10(-UP AREA (S AFF P IN CARS) B.Z3.Op • �i / / - b�, ��5• ," t N se LINE '�y ' / ^ 'Pik °� �`� STRUCTURE NUMBER v O e ffi % I �SUB-STRUCTURE NCB 1:03.1 0° ,F a comuF Fxoo T = TOP OF STRUCTURE 1 = INVERT ELEVATION ! ! , o d e i3".� P""'("'�2 • � ' ! � m.�, STRUCTURE ABBREVIATIONS I , d 16 O R 6.31.00 ° Ill I+ _ NEW STORM SEWER CATCH BAS! = NCB NEW STORM SEWER MANHOLE = NMH - d/\/\/�/\/\) , V �� oe o NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NSMH ° o 15 s a pm e Q a-x.w 12 g'.3•.00 5"" �� , o yQ�PS 3 "✓ : egSeMeNr �� ° ? SITE DATA: i 6 e 91 IMP 6 AREA OF SITE 6,306,216 S.F. OR 144.7708 ACRES R 6 *A UAW 30.00 "�� ! ! AREA OF SCENIC EASEMENT I ° - ---NEW FIRE• Mg_ �- A "t` % SOUTH g FRh[ 9 10 � , (S•�;:o�STABIU:;DSOi BASE) a (SOUTH) 1,386,122 S.F. OR 31.8210 ACRES 8 3}� aa' l i 1 e r� (NORTH) 266,085 S.F. OR 6.1085 ACRES O 5 51N,,,� IT LG.33.00 fl na -.- / / � TOTAL 1,652,207 S.F. OR 37.9295 ACRES EXISTING ¢`• ,' ,'' � AREA OF BUILDINGS WETLANDS ''.: �Q� N w A ,HALT DRIVE e (EXISTING} 26,225 S.F. OR 0.60 ACRES LIMIT W i '' t$' o ( , ° NEW SILT CE & H LES i 'tea, a�" TO BE REMOVED) -14100 S.F. OR -032 ACRES 6-gym , r�-T$Tlw1{q Id#f ci�Uclai g0 ( f (NEW) 386,796 S.F. OR 8.88 ACRES ° �.� N07E t `" rte.: 1 FRESHWATER WETLAND �� \.. TOTAL (NET) 398,921 S.F. OR 9.16 ACRES WJ ,,• �a 32-00 BEFFREYOUNDARY EM PCBY PERCENT LOT COVERAGE c _ .iIOUNDA Y AS FLAGGED COAST alb s �3yQp ENVIRONMENTAL CORP, AND ,' J,� O S 9.16 = 144.7708 = 6.33% .... ,�,pF: �� APPROVED BY NYSDEC ON - � ,. E. NEW AL ING ,^'`REAr / 8 ( T MING 4 PARKING-52 CM � •� PERCENT LANDSCAPED 28.4 = 144.7708 19.62%= - NEW PEDESTRIAN PATH , " APPROXIMATE AREAS IN ACRES NEW POND NO 4 NEW ASPHALT DRIVE WATER SURFACJ:0.15: "T bR"cLAYC01PA TED / '4-�q, PRESENT AFTER COMPLETION MEADOW AND BRUSHLINE 74.0 51.3 lee, e $ FOREST (WOODED) 49.3 36.9 .. AGRICULTURAL 0.0 0.0 FRESHWATER WETLANDS 2.8 4.9 NEW MP�11.00R 40,0 5 DAM a 2 ° �dy D mWATER TC0 "D 12. UNVEGETAED EARTH 12.4 4.7 0.6 9.2 PAVEDD SURFACES 0.1 12.1 LAWNS AND LANDSCAPING 4.8 28.4 PARKING a REQUIRED SHEET 4 OF 113 SeM e �- �� • SHEET 5 OF 113 SHEET 2 O F 113 1 FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING 118 x 2 = 236 now«f«marl Dern Reolt Co. - ° ° w�a SHEET 3 O F 13 - MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING ° p O�N 2 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 40 x 1.5 = 60 v r a GROLM TOP OF AOAo 3 BEDROOM 17 x 2.25 = 39 NEW POND N0. i `�\� G 75 x 2.0 = 150 WATT EL-a.oas \S�- HEALTH CENTER e s .VIq ON G SKILLED CARE CENTER BEDS 32 ® 1 = 32 ASSISTED LIVING CENTER APPARTMENTS 24 @ 1 = 24 M / • TOTAL = 541 WATER SVRFACf,EL-12.00 ' p. - �z'q YcouPAciEn o PROVIDED s e 2 CAR GARAGE EACH COTTAGE 118 x 2 = 236 135 CAR GARAGE @ APARTMENT BUILDING = 133 NEW STORMWATER DETENTION of POND/WETLAND 8c BIOFILTRATION SYSTE No.t PARKING AREA GUEST/DINING & FACILITY = 52 " No.3 STAFF 64 - (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR LIST OF PLANTS) DpSTiNG PUBLICER WATSUPPLY FACILITY No.2 GUEST = 25 �� ° � _ - NEW Roo(DAM Na 1 WA RFACYC�EL-2.00 PACTED 7� _ $ No.4 RECREATION THE Z = 37 0 %L - TOTAL = 548 � OM ._ O #' DATUM NGVD (MSL 1929) Y • 4. 2F� UNIT OF EW � ,� N4 � T - o PECONIC LANDING ' . DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER 0' MIN. TO 50' MAX. �s NEW 1 � A p EM POND N0. 5 ° aF AT SSU TH OLC OWNER: WATER SOR CCA EL-12.00 LTMI�ESaL�t'O ClAYC011PACTED ,. 6 f, 4 R-40 �� I THE GEORGETOWNCOMBUILIDINGIES = A64-b �• 101 CHESLEY DRIVE & RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY a �,�: wd R_� MEDIA, PA 19063-1761 NEW SANITARY SEWER ,Its PUMP STATION ' RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITYfl APPLICANT: no e U S RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES W - 7-`1 ON BEHALF OF PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. THE GEORGETOWN BUILDING 101 CHESLEY DRIVE R-� # MEDIA, PA 19063-1761 s c E F-,4I c E A s E n.,E iv r �I Iv E -'- RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY p 0 t n , Q' TO BE RENbVEp •, - - o r LIFE CARE COMMUNITY 1'J r r NOTE: .a, _, R_,� A -- - --" BRECKNOCIC HALL, ITS ASSOCIATED GARAGE 6(GREENHOUSE, ,,� (l ARI)THE LARD£WOOD FRAME SAM RK BE RETAINED IN & 0` PECONIC LANDIN AT� ACCORDANCE PATH THE OFFICE of PARKS,RECREATKd k SOUTHOLD o - To BE REMOVED HISTORIC PRESERVAflON FR-801 _ RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY I o "r RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY TO BE REMOVED At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York - � _ > W � To BE rzaavED Suff. Co. Tax Map: 1000 35 1 1 1 25 Z Z _ District Section Block Lot o In W r;» Ul GENERAL LAY TO BE REMOVED ® _ Y W ' O r r'------ Q tar-_----� I I R I i I I 0 A Z I � QREi]IIT FIRE DISTRICTW W � 3 A t t < I m N LOCATION ,�� NEW y I ISI A P � W. r o I � o § � A SCALE: 1" 600' I 2 I I I a o I ^� T 45893 (vim �-- I o• TO BE FENOVED J m � _ _. __ _-, LAND _ NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK � + OF NFA ,r\Q' S G• �.yo SEP. 6, 2000 e .oe x s , .- o, NOV. 24, 1998 MAIN ROAD NEw CONCRETE cxjRe SEP 1 5 1UUU -k * AUG. 24, 1998 µ,,f ( N . Y. S S. RTE. 2 5) a �. JUNE 29, 1998 MAY 19, 1998 ,s ° m MAY 14, 1998 E T 2 r O F 1 3 �/` c� �, SHEET 8 OF 13 --- Y SEPT. 17, 1997 - QQ awAn c-° R,.. 6 > DATE : SEPT. 4. 1997 dFF$$�ONP� SCALE :1" = 100' JOB NO. :97-0290 I -- SHEET N0. :1 OF 13 b _ - ---- --- -- - --- -- ------ ------ " I ro I 970290_s _101 OF 13 I , ° SEE SHEET No. 4 OF 13 Young & Young, Land Surveyors k _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 1190f 3 ,I i _ 1 _ - --- L�. .5 516 - 727-2303 �. I , i 1 d i 1 1 1 `ti I '�',I \ 1 \ JI 1 ;la 1 1 \\• T/ ��LLa l 1 '\ I 1 1' 1 1 I1 I - -20 " 1 i 1' \ 1 I J' - I � i I I r n, i'/ it r / Young, - / I I ' r^ t, z-t � - ^z - t Y t I _ 994 I `' f 908 1 1, =�-- L.S. , " �� P.E & , n W. �� lde - , I 1� � A � I I r i 1 / 1 1 I`' r' 1 \ , `j. /� I \ f r _ _ ► ! ''I' Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor r` 9 � - �' o��•,.. - Thomas C. Wol ert, P ro e ssional Engineer Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor I I I� 1• � ►'' r, x nu Land Surveyor I \1 , rl• - ', -_-- John Sch rr, - \ J 1''', - Ir 1 , ' I 1' 1 1 - J 1'v / - -- i i1� I 1 1 t' `, i 1 � \h O - - I C \ ea - I 1 e - f rm - O r / _ W tannin i Y Q - 1 ` / \ 1 v \ �-J £nginrsriag I 1 � , 1 { 26.50. { N W PON I 1 1 , nPUP in \ t 1- V GROUND WATER Et-3.OD /' \ , / � 1 t �' i•\1 �, `;�, ��. \ \ \ % --_ 1" � z� _ _ l� V,- 1 .�. .:4. :309'�" 1 . . ----- -;--,>_ - -- - ''376.40 / it ' / �' \, •�i ' .\\ \ .. ;r \y / 1 i !� N 65'07 50 � \ • _ ! 1 J .._ - \ � ! , `1 .\:, \Z. p• �.. � �, \ \ 1 J; l'� �, i �_ NMH :01`.0 - v. % I I � \ \ i ! \ ,,y! \' , ', w, I 1 I -- \ - :1,l l l \•'.- <�.', l .'f,Y •� E �pN D �NO, •' ! ` \ r" \--_----'-- I ' '\')\' \ '\',\.L\\\ I � � I � '''I'; ''t I 1\� ., • Il I � r�, r,, 1 II I' rl - � ATER R EEL 12.Q 1114 L_ 2'— R -0 COMPACT ! ' 1 I �` \ `ti t \ i � 1 •.'�,\i r-'I\` ::1 -i I I I I, 1 ,1 , , , ', � \\ - i 1 .11 ,( r � \ , TOPS01 R CL Y 1 \ —'1'1 .1 (6" RAINFALLHWM EL : 2 _ \,,,, I i n► '', i �i \, ;' 1 ,II � 1 "c� �1' \\ , ,1 1 NEW•ROCK' HEADW O \ \ I p0.`'i'.\\,\•,\\ 1 {, 1 + ,1 i ,It \ \T 13.00 I ! ", -- L- -• \ , I \ 1 + t \, .� 1 \ , ',\': ;,\' \ ,.+ 1 � .I\ q = 9.0p _ { ' I , I \ ,( ' qtly \:'Z,,,\ ,V,•\\ '',` \ `� / j' !1 I i � I ,', �1 /,: fly'`1 I! -C`"� � j 1 t 1 { \ \ � 1 `, mi / ' \\ ',\ ,�� \ ' \ ', c. \\ \ / ' ! l r 1 I !i \ 1 , II / / I y+l lu'I, Lr•� S I 1 ,Hi _ , 1� \ 1 \ ` b\ ETENTION NEW TORMW\ATER`, 'j*7`, { \ 1 1 ND /WET N 8c1310EILT\ ATION SYS D / T \ \ (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOS LIST', OF PLANTS) ) 1�' F'�• '� r - ;,' 1 , \ - e ; \ \ ~�l•\'' '1;; ! \`'ll \� - '�,.-„ Yi%.- ^ki �,' �• C ;! !ji'I I''1' J -.1 I r, -- - - \\ NCB 6.01.0 /. -� I > N E '�1r I/V T,� 22.75 I \� ,,\ �C ~\ 1 `�;'' ' \�-�- '`�- �/ / , ; 1 ,..-. I 18.51 �\ 1'tih, ' �� / :li•I, r AM / i W..,TE' URFI�C EL-9 00 R \\ i� '{,' LINE 'JVdTH 21-, COMPACTED- \\ 1 \ 1 \ i=-- \ '.TOP_EL= - i i -11/,' �',' TOP L 'OR{ AY - \ _'ii_-;---__-" Y' 21. 23.00 ` e' N;�RE + •,, I, ` 1 , \ \ _ * r-0 �� ,.,\ 'IFI ®' NCB 6. 1.1 %�,' �I <�\ \ 1 ,{. NEW ROCK DAM >`. 4 ' \\ 1 1 \\ T = 22.751 \ I 1 \ I = 18.75 1 TOP EL=15.00 , - i \ \ ` ( 4 \ 1 , \ r, _`�\Y. \�'< \• / -"�_—^ ----+Z'- ��- ��i -' /. /!. WEIR EL=12.00 LIMIT OF NEW I _ • � - 1 , `, � I - + - ---- -- -"z I ,\ `, � ,�.��•,\,,,`��,.-�_ r-�__ _�I �_ - ,-'_ - '_ WETLANDS . ' lE 111, ; I •1 _ I ; % '\ `'•\~\ (�\ `\�` %(� rl\ 1� --�= .i6 � ! - �r\ EW`'ROCK HeADWALL NO. 3 16.00 / \ \ �i \ \ \� '� � >i; v 17 ', / \\\ ', - _ \\ 1• \v\ i \_ _=�' 'p/ til \`_V1_=i, --- == --� / - - - \ -- ,- -- NEW POND NO. 5 ' I \ \ 12. LINE / LINE WITH -2'-0" COMPACTED !/ TOPSOIL OR CLAY - !/ 1 S O� I 1° 2:._- \ - 24.40 - `\ \ � ,. `' �� -� J ' �"-- -- ' ;��'_ ) ��;=~�� _ f" .;�° "• _ 255, �;. _ �' _. H' Y :y _ i•',iy s r 'b -�i "t�J , . •(r'Y:'Lts'F �`.,`~ - o Y.J§ C.O.JNO.2 -- , --_ / -� `\ TO BE REMOVED 1 '',°a}? :,f _ - _- -�_ - � - ` _ Vii}' _ - _ > , ti - y - wF[,._ �- j - - - -` , •\ - -- - � J./ / f -i'1ry2= '.yam_ ! - '1' �r�'' J ''-' :S-+r u'•_., -� .� I. -, �I LJ'- � } L _ rJ , r. - , .� _ s � �/\� _ ,�. NOTE: SRECKNOCK� HALL, '.`{TS ASSOC.. , �;�RAGE _ L 'SRN 'WILL BE RE A-IN E IN , - . 'AND THE LARGE WOOD FRAME = t M -_ t `', = ACCORDANCE WITH' THE OFFICE. ! ARKS, RECREAITON� 8� - ' �1 .i,, ':r;' ��,�L - ,- f _ ,. ` _ `I �T' 1 Il HISTO PRESERVATION. - 1 ` _ -- `�-. = F ;. B 7.03. Y {s 1 \ 1 %\_ I \ _- - wr• `r — Y"" ' s. -�t `J 1 - - __ _ -'✓.- J,r.;::,� TO BE REMOVED w� .. T 20.0o -•- l ' \ c l. 1 t 1' ;�IJ r _. `-'+,:«�U: O - - 74' .� I. � . i - ,, , _ I O ;•1 .,\. t \ \' I (' \ 1 1, - ------ a�.._x`_'y - '-i'18e _I '' -X� - _ r. { - `� 1 N rJ'; I-r•.,%,' �' w //b,/'" 4 1 , + `:1 '\I, 11 1 / 1. ,- "J ` �---_ \ 18 PVC P\PE��. �;: a} / - - - 1 `�i� `� '� r_' I �' -- - \ - -r•'�, 4 ,1 `, 1 / C, v \ `. `• - - - _ 283' 'a;•. -- ! /_ ----- -/ -.:. , � I 1 1 r 1_- ' TO BE, REMOVED C.O. N0.3 & AIR RE!EASE VALVE 1 { NCB 7.03.0 T 20-00 1 ,^'11 \, - \ e'" - !G i { I S 1 15.76 � •' l I, , , d•P`,, ,' 1 I I i r' - ,f 1 �„',+%.... '�Sc�...,,� .t` it ' 1, NEW_ 4 SANITARY - SEWER-- 'FORCE- MAIN O.1 N0.4 K _C- - NMH 7.Q .0 1 I� v - ,- SJ \ _ \ O / T = 17.87 ( " J 1 \ 4 \ 1 = 12.54' i i; � •.r,�r''r - \\ { - • I To BE REMOVED KEY TO EXISTING TREE SPECIES: KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME 1 \., ' \\ O -� F,. i I �3 9. FIS rr� _ ` `- - \ 6- — - - - - -- - --\— / - O Yt- \ I O :: \ 100' \ ^I _ / i<, r - < it :` �,`L �'' QA QUERCUS ALBA WHITE OAK SF SALIX FRAGILIS CRACK WILLOW r-N NORWAY SPRUCE FG PA PICEA ARIES IFOLIA ' 1 - - - CIA _ �,,I':a " ' � _ _ _ _ AGPSEUDDOACA BMA CK LOCK ST H P ROB NS cp EA EUONYMUS ALATUS WINGED EUONYMUS GREENPORT FIRE DISTRACT PP PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE Area = 21,200 SgFt -' 8 �_'� 4�'J-�� •°° / PH PLATANUS x HYBRIDA LONDON PLANE-TREE y 4 _ �. , CF CORNUS FLORIDA FLOWERING DOGWOOD JN JUGLANS NIGRA BLACK WALNUT - 1 / I \ �• '� I '``."�"t„ ',,;,r',y'd-_. '� _ ' _. _, ;";, .. -�_''i � � MA MORUS ALBA WHITE MULBERRY LT LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP TREE AP ACER PLATANOIDES NORWAY MAPLE 1 / PRUNUS SERRULATA ORIENTAL CHERRY MS MAGNOLIA SOULANGEANA SAUCER MAGNOLIA ti� / Y „ AS ACER PSEUDOPLATANUS SYCAMORE MAPLE _ - \ --- PL POPULUS ALBA WHITE POPLAR 01 \\ i \• I! -Y / \ oa / F $' tiY HC HALESIA CAROLINA CAROLINA SILVERBALL AH AESCULUS HIPPOCASTANUM HORSE CHESTNUT SP PRUNUS SP. FLOWERING PLUM BS BUXUS SEMPERVIRENS BOXWOOD (SHRUB) Wu _ UA ULMUS AMERICANA AMERICAN ELM 1 - 8.37 _t CT CARYA TOMENTOSA MOCKERNUT HICKORY - '--- I I \\\ ! - NEW LEACHING/tYS M "A" `, - ' ! f AC ACER SACCHARINUM SILVER MAPLE >" 1 - 8.37 ',- { (12) lo'a x T EP POOLS ` !-- s µ {_. SD SALIX DISCOLOR PUSSY WILLOW (SHRUB) <, r I \\ ,! { I ,' " s :•;.r,_+''' RC RHAMNUS CATHARTICA EUROPEAN BUCKTHORN x . W � PE PRUNUS SEROTINA WILD BLACK CHERRY SIZE & LOCATION OF PARCEL I I{ _ - `o^= ' - !! = `' =i PV PRUNUS AVIUM MAZZARD CHERRY 4- TO BE AQUiRED BY GREENPORT - • ' `°., � \ / ••'' - - ! `T'. ? UNKNOWN ORNAMENTAL FIRE DISTRICT IS APPROXIMATE. I NCB 7.01.1 T_i3.so -_ - ,, i oQ� �y - � � it 14-__ -J r /�• r __ , 70 _ - 1 � LIFE CARE COMMUNITY 1 I 1. -I ., Tai i j a RESET CATCH BASIN RESET CATCH BASIN - _ 13/75 I L;y '"�,\�h /� r '='' C 4 �/ AT NEW CURBUNE PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD C.O. N0.5 < ( VEGETATION TO REMAIN ;30.00 ° ince-x.01 0 K; - AT tJE,w CURBLINE ' __ / WELL. PIT __ . I I - - -- U, i = '920 _ , _ of. SOUTHOLD so' 3O.00' A _. 4 =- - -' - - -- = ,' � F'. _ At: GREENPORT Town - - - - - _ _ Suffolk County, New York / - - LIL 46 — - -- - - - L- HYDRANT- 1 - +- + < _ -WM - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ — _ ---- - — — — " — - -W11- - - - _ W � s 4 LIL 48 NYT 3795 O WM EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - — --- -`- - �_ _ �� — � —..-— � WATER MAIN I NEW , - _ - - Suff. Co, Tax Map: 1 25 - SIGN a 1000 3s 1 ' HIGH _ d -- - - -- - - � ' / C.O. N0.6 A .lye � 8' WIDE X 3' District Section Bock Lot I - _ = - - _ _ M LE a - - - - - SITE PLAN - - — — - - -- - --I --- - - 297' OF 4" SDR18 PVC PIPE _ _ `I _ i E • \� I __ ... ....... - _ __-__ — _ c 324' OF 4" SCR18 PVC PIPE � � r MANHOLE < �_ �M GM- - - - - - - - - - -GM - - - - rt — - - - - - - — — — — __ _ - I _ 'IAS— -3-- " — �.,.��-�.:.:�"'.T ww,.. s�= fvYT-:518-P _ _ _ NYT 376 � p - - __ -{y 7 _— GM_—_—— — — — GM- — . � —i�"� --_ a N , o I E _ _ d 1 o T \ + s ': ♦ ! *"•'r r . NYT 374 NYT373 NYT 372 _ - �(� YT 380 - -- - - - N - - _ ' NYT 375 , WOOD FENCE TELEPHONE MANHOLE -- _ _ _ --_ _ GAS MAIN -O ' - a N 71 O ... NYT 370 •NYT 3 FIRM W Y / - �. 10 L I- \ I \ 11 / { C.O. NO.7 Y �"s o o ............................... P................. .. o LAW NE `- z� G �S/� 0,4 SEP. 6, 2000 NOV. 24, 1998 AUG. 24, 1998 JUNE MAY 199 1998 „ \ \ nn SEPT. 17, 1997 = — \ DATE � SEPT. 4, 1997 61483 , JOB SCALN O. :97-290 OFESSIO�P SHEET NO. :2 OF 13 `= SEE SHEET No. 8 OF 13 o -- -- -- --— --- - - - - _ "970290_sp_101" ' 1 SEE SHEET No. 4 OF 13 Young & Young, Land Surveyors 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 1190f 7 If -20 itl f Alden W. Young, P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) r Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor ssional Engineer Thorrms C. Wolpert, Profe 7 Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor John Schnurr, Land Surveyor -7 now or formerly Jem Ripcl, y Co. 8, N W POND NO. W GR;OUND WATER EL=3-00± J, -T- �76.40' P 3 N 65'07��(Y`E--, �0 U C 2 0 INP A; PON -N E D -C ------- ATE EL=1 2.0 COMPAC I til,N E OPSOIL, CL*Y HWM EL 121 (6" RAINFALL) EADW 1i�IRQCKIIHEADW I V.up �i�TOR M W' \A TE R b\ ETENTION NEW , , 7 E SYS N D TL ' N B10F R /W ILT ATION (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOk LiST; OF PLANTS) --------------- NCS EW ., ,- 2-- T�= 22.75 U R I F Do' ) W 25 L I NTT: 'H/' 21 C 0 m Ak C, IT E 1 18.51 NEW R AM ------------ - ' - ,! . 1(0)�Hp Y TQPEL-15 'OR'1� 2.gO At 23 00 9,3 NQB 6.61.1 NEW ROCK DAM 1\ 4 T = 22.75 1 77 I = 18.75 1 TOP EL=15.00 WEIR EL=12.00 LIMIT OF NEW' WETLANDS E=—:: F:::- -T-/ 15 EW'�ROCK H�ADWALL NO. 3 0 16.00 �77 0, IE 0 0. 5 12.00 LINE WITH COMPACTED TOPSOIL OR CLAY �4 1 7 Q, j 2440 ------------- Wi U- Wm F- F C-- F:7 I= NA E= 9" jN 0 9" jN iH z 0 W 24: At 0 W --------—------ 0 TO B E REMOVED (n j- -3 W L jl� NOTE: ARAGE- 'fTS ASSOC!A� BRECKNOC6 ALL AND THELA RGIE WOOD FRAME E XR N ILL BE R INE T�HE OFF I CE, -F RKS, REC E ITO �j ACCORD-ANCE WI TH� HISTOR& PRESERVATION. ' B 7.03.1 T = 20.00 I = 16.00 0 BE REMOVED 10 2,85 C.Q. NO.3 & A R ASE VALVE I TO BE., REMOVED IR E aQQ�7.03.Q zu-uu 15.76 EW -4 SANITAR E- MAIN ,SEWERTORIC 'I�Q.�Qj IN OJ4 NUH 7.0 .0, T = 17.87 I = 12.54-' KEY TO EXIS"nNG TREE SPECIES: TO BE REMOVED KEY BOTANICAL 1 FL op 0 - - - - - - - - - - --- OA 0 100' ' WHITE OAK SF SALIX FRAGILIS CRACK WILLOW PH PA PICEA ABIES NORWAY SPRUCE RP ROBINIA PSEUDOACACIA FG FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA AMERICAN BEECH CID EA EUONYMUS ALATUS WINGED EUONYMUS PIP PICEA PUNGENS -TREE GREENPORT FIRE DISTRICT PH PLATANUS x HYBRIDA LONDON PLANE Area 21,200 SqFt CIF CORNUS FLORIDA FLOWERING DOGWOOD 11' 1H JN JUGLANS NIGRA BLACK WALNUT MA MORUS ALBA WHITE MULBERRY LT LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP TREE ACER PLATANOIDES NORWAY MAPLE AP PS ORIENTAL CHERRY MS MAGNOLIA SOULANGEANA SAUCER MAGNOLIA AS SYCAMORE MAPLE POPULUS ALBA WHITE POPLAR C) 0 PIL C) HC HALESIA CAROLINA ALL LO 6 AH AESCULUS HIPPOCASTANUM HORSE CHESTNUT SIP PRUNUS SP. FLOWERiNG PLUM BOXWOOD (SHRUB) BS BUXUS SEMPERVIRENS UA ULMUS AMERICANA AMERICAN ELM 8.37 CT MOCKERNUT HICKORY Lf)l AC ACER NEW LEACHING/tYSIEM "A" SACCHARINUM SILVER MAPLE LOW (SHRUB) 8.37 (12) 10 0 x 7'/KEP POOLS SID SALIX DISCOLOR PUSSY WIL N RC RHAMNUS CATHARTICA 0 WI PE PRUNUS SEROTINA SIZE LOCATION OF PARCEL PV TO BE AQUIRED BY GREENPORT FIRE DISTRICT IS APPROXIMATE. NQB 7.01.1 z T = 13.50 I = 9,50 1 LIFE CARE COMMUNITY 70' -J, 0 t RESET CATCH,BASIN i4 -�b AT NEW CURBILINE RESET CATCH BASIN PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD A-r NE;V CURBLINE �QN O�5 VEGETATION TO REMAIN 1.00% 13.50 T PIT WELL At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD 50' h---,�HYD X,4,i 4=4 L Suffolk County, New York Wm— WiM LIL L6 _,R -LLL- 7 LIL 48 MENT'2: DGE 01 NYT 379S WM WATER MAIN F::--E Suff. Co. Tax Map: 1-- 1 25 -NE W S1 GN District Section Block Lot 8' WIDE X 3� HIGH 0.6 Q.0. IN �NYT I TE PLAN OF F MANHOLE GM— — — — — — — 297' SDR18 PVC PIP SDR18 PVC PIPE 4" 324' OF 4 rM n GM— — — — — — —GM GM— — — — — --— — — — — — —GM— ————————————- —Gm NE GAS MAIN NYT NYT 375- YT 371 N; NYT 376 ..."YT -NYT 374 NYT 373 NYT 372 NYT 370--'o--- --- . . ...... MANHOLE WOOD FENCE TELEPHONE ........ OT 380 FIRM 7,0AE 70 ........... 10 45 .7 - C> LAND 0 ................ ......................... .......... G C. 0 SEP. 6, 2000 ol NOV. 24, 1998 AUG. 24, 1998. JUNE 29, 1998 MAY 19, 1998 SEPT. 17, 1997 7 DATE SEPT. 4, 199 SCALE 1" = 40' JOB NO, 97-290 SHEET NO. : 2 OF 13 SEE SHEET No. 8 OF 13 "970290sp1 01 ------------ --- - o o ` - Young & Young, Land Surveyors a 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 =�s-' C , SEE SHEET No. 5 OI� 13 516-727-2303 � ,= IIlIIi� SEE SHEET N o. 4 OF 13 Y ,- 9 Alden iY Youn 1 �,2`a j «.-o q P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) '�s� - - - n _ I = ,s.00 of,,, tc `. Q I Howard W Young, Land Surveyor , , l '" 8d`' & T = 23.59 � eu o / Thomas C. Wol ert Pro essional En ineer ' )_1 `\ T 2,. o '. - \ _ e .. /' ,I = 15.02 _ - -c� tom. \ 4... Land Surveyor i� ,� _ x ©" IIung `' /-/ - I 33' o '3s"0 HDPE PIPI`® 0. I I \ 7 -��` __ u1 NSMH 2.02.2 /\ / / /s^g'�. . c' may; ,I 3:" \ ` '';Zt� CV i \ / Kenneth F. Abruzzo, .4- L, < \M \ \ :�.g ---- - k / - No y?¢0. <m , / c/ ,o / , John Sehnurr, Land Surveyor .-.: :.. r ... _ =, o _. \' I 1s 1q PF. o tiV 210 1 ( '._,'\: 'c,. \ I / T 25 0 1 - ' j p`pe1�<� ,/ `" ry,.' // vi t\ �/l lanninq ,T-- 75 ' ! \\4' °a>0 µ �1 - i� /�¢ya y 'w. .-.' "s �._o - gY // j t t' T.S t i {_ J o \ 1 cn I x / i / /' i / / 23.80 "" r -'NSMH .05.0 ~ / ' 1 1 INI n 13.7 ! 1 - ,I t 4th- d\� .0` \ \ i 1 M n� # I / ': I `gym.. �r - _ � \ I n inrrrin � `9� r,l 0 0 l 1 ' O'. , �• T 16.8 t / b _� 7 � v _- - N r V 1 47.9 S NE M_ OIfVRY RET NTNG /-�y � ;,-�--�-i__I-' ----•�_ ""�..,c sr• � � \ ___ _ � = 17.x7 w � - ' TO OF W L = 30" ABOV / i - � -- - J " -- C T�RLIN F ROAD / I + 1 , y i•°�>.tip ; - - 1 �' / \ I < _. ! ' \ \ y. 0.A \\ / - - \ \ i NMH 4.07.0 /' / I r` - \ _ - - - /` 1\ ,r + i ; / I 4 �Ij \\`�`--`� 'm.',/,D, `�\,, ��-- ---- /'`/�� \ - NS 24.40 2 \\ \ 1'- 14.88 I 1 __ 23.90 / f / I -� , i I � I\ ! i I' 't ; \ �� O `` \ / / ` `\ ~,Y='20.40' \ _ \ i 1 - / I O .I I / % -1 �_� I / NSMH 0 \ _ 3 `\ / \ _ - / . \ `> l °I/ / £; 1 j�;^ o --- \ / 1 i' \ T 1.--- - \\ 09 ., \ r \ /,/ - ---t ` _ 1, /� , i; :=.i // I .�, 4 l \/ r\• l t' / / r \ .nr,., \ \ 3 `, tl \ ?9.6 / , .\ = 76 \ \ .;- , \` I \ / i' \ ` /' I / O3 t� N '! / // \ \ \ \ �4 g \ \ / \ `� \ i I / �v 11 _ _ ; 1 \ 4.00'x` \ \ / \ / \,zlc. \ I ,, I i 1�, -' /' \\ \ "�,�^y i NS�[H 1.05. / - � \\ / 04 -� 1 //, i O /' -�'/ , // I i 4 \ 1' \ \ r,},- \ T = 2�0 11 /. / , � /'// i' (P / � 1 t e.'® 1 I / / / / ,� I \., '� 24. '� X4.4 \\ \\ \ �' .� I 12.42\\ `�,� ,' -`..' O \\ 6',��,�` `/ 1 ii /. _ I I .Q' ./ J -- - \\ \ \ 1_, �\ Q 9 ' c '�� \ ae`` %t / 2.04.0 i 't Lr^ , i \\\ \.\ <TD ` \ - t _ -- � �CF 9� rt J\\\ ,li, f T'_ 24.27 _ / \ --� / - i \ \\ \ x€ \� - \ � `'� 'a y 15.79 / O / / \ / / \\\ - 1 \ c @' : 1\ \ H_4.01.0 - \ \ p0 ' , 1 11� � / _ _ / / \� /, \ \ \ ` T = 24.00 \ \\ \ >I �V ' % ' /' - -- / / _ I _ __ \ '\, r=-_� .\\ \ ,1.0, / \ �\ 1 NMH 4.06.0 ' : i, - s, ,' ��` �' / Q ,'\ / / `\ I - - \\ \ 5 3 \` -r i \ - - ' T 22.25 - I •:�i, // (�Q / - ,/ \'\ \`\ I '' _. ` ., 1 �\ \ \. I _ r R: ® ` . 331 1 - 13.91 / }/' J .�':�' ��F� 61 / // / \ O`\ 1 %I \\ \\ ,,\ / I \I' // 1 \ /mss _ i.� J �i 3 C> \\ \ \ ur td / 1 _ �" 04 a 1 \\\\�\� \\ \ 1/ y \\ \ \ A� N•. , I / '� I II \ �.` `i /' -Y- - \ -__- / .ice, er,.: /.`V i \\\ 1/; �- /moi// // a - \ - -- \ i \ / / ,\ '\ .\ \ a _.; � I _ -.`_ . \ \ '� \\ /,.."q , I � - _- - \ /I -\_/ \ ,/ / 11 .� 23 E < \ `\ '` - n / � , It r -) ' / -i"- , cJ�\ I' -'w1 _ 4.0 .2 �Y,�.1=4 , >/l `/r J-Y 1 / 5 i /' `\ 0'. o [ cc,`- �� .. \ `` - 21.23 Q\Q�' /l. l __ / 1 \ \ \\ "c^,, / 1 -? \ .\I'•>7+ I T '\ \ i, \ -- 1 = 17:53 Qw- SMH 2.03.0 r // i I 1\ XITING P.UBLI \ \ \ �$ o % l i \,- C tn` 9G��y \ I \ ' 1 r T 23.13 �� >�' / / , S ��' y r ®s / v R\ `\\ ro ti� 7 --1-';15.379 1 r L T "_UPPLY ; FAC 1: j j , -'>~; I:I' - -- �r \\ .__..C, \ -'_._ \ 11 \/ \\, IV fie , O ! I /, -� I \\\, ` OO - _�. y\ ''�� \�. i -�~� v 1\ (v -E. t { l l I , �' y . i i / i l / \ - I- _'�_--_._�_�_ \ y"1 1 ,\\ \ i \ j' \ �F !'-. I I I 1 h ,}> ) - NSMH 1. O / \ \\`\`- /' �' C, i �O /� \ C��\Q O / / 6. ��.. % q. V O I ` I - " r r 1-a � _ ,' , / e NCB 4.05.3 0. \ �o o o / - 1JJ \ 'I `IT -'1--- I , 1}, - 1 = 11.77 / `1 NCB 2.0 , ,r i ---- -i-'� ��Q �' - 1 = t7.94 ,\�'® ( I \ N `�w // / / ,i ; _- \ I I I H,y� 1 ', \ - _ - - I T = 19 0 , yA - >FA @ \ /v / -? \ n,,I,� , , I = 5 -i` ------------_ aF, �o F I \ �c O / / ="s w - !' 1. \' _ /' j i '^I.' zt10 0�,. , \, ®J X60 /- - 9 \\\ %` r --- - > //� `I - / /t, ; ' _ Fi' 4.05.1 \ I _ \ i / -_ _ \ j %/ i CONCRETE �, // \ --/ " T = 21.56 \ \ � // / - \\ / =K- - -j 1 " BLOCK BUILDING r . „ _ -= /. o I 60�, i" - __ _ S ® o' I 17.37 N,S " I \ // / ,,,- \ / t i /' \'� a 1 ,/ i / N 4 NOPE p\P /i i / I 12.20 E,W .jam ' i' i I I \ O// -� / -_ - 1= -. - - _ " ' - .- . - i i cold r}z Youn &• Young, Land Surveyors _w_ Q g 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 2, 0 516-727-2303 3 »un SEE S H EET N o. 4 OF 13 SEE SHEET N a. 5 OF 13 _� Q Alden W Young, P.E & L.S. (1808-1984) _ :1111 1VL[f- .;, Howard W. Young Land Surveyor - I �.1 s.00 ,f d 1111._ /c ri: _ / E neer _ s _1=.✓ F 8 T = 23.59 c o as C. Wo t ert, Pro a sional ngi --- - yob a `� � I _._--- t\ Thom p f r -11 21. __ . ., /� _ - c� I \ �/ - 1 pF �.. I 15.02 _. t� �• \ Abruzzo Land Surve or Dltit - I =\10. 7 ;-- - _ Wr / / a�� Kenneth F. s3 ps HDPE P >o... F r / - x _ d Surve or i �, bw _ __ F -_ H 4 John Sehnurr, Lan 5 ;-� *� ,� �;-, . �:� •, �' . . �.. , .. °,.��, 1111 \ �..,.y _ 1111 � � 0 09; ;,.-;i ! O O l y .r.>� ._ , 1111. �:.,. ., ,a n ,�� _ .. p >' ° ..._ .. _.. <, . -, �� .... x u _ a, M !�� / 25.40 J/ � � i ;, .,_1111, a. ,-- �,p y T,�_ , � i F ;�.>. m � �� . -*i: ! 1 =21.50 , i i 1'VP C x 0 p \ ® I - / 7 �4' �_ / { lsuuiu yT - , .75 ' }` 1 .;.0 . .. t1 / _ x. o. r !L q I N I / i X3 80 i 1111 - _ -- . F ; • NSMH 2.0 (Q N - / r \ .. C�p / T- -- _ °,4n cry - i- 1 � o5 T - 25.2 ^J / { xc ynrer�tt - \ rr I i `*11 2 f" -G - L 7 --•1 ". <'. -b I = 16.1$ N,5 r^`- RET. NTNG `>" _ . - , sr n { k NE:� tVl 0�1 R Y - - - , 9 d D� , 1 .97 W i - - fir:,. O {� -- - \ , �urnr ar J r - / _ I \ a 11.11 N rn ; Y i i' / y WA S 1 & 2 �' _ ,_ - __- 1 _ ,_ \ �. p, , .� 25 r TO OF W = 30 ABO ,, -` ,- 1111 1111 t G T�RLIN ;' F ROAD / L, �' ": \ F \ NMH 4.07.0 / - __ -_ / I A 1�,, ��` -_ - L S ,7 .,/A " N T - 23.90 �� -�- 1 1 \- �� i-/ / Y= 14.88 II -i \ I 1 \ � C. \ 1, / \ T 24.40 d / 1 \ N / ire 2D.40, r i' q I �. NSMH 0 3 \ r / > ' % 1 ,� o , - 4 1 I - _ _ ---- \ / = 76 \ 4.00 + r \ / \ / r: i .z l � 1� 1 \ w t, / \\ / �✓ sem. - t i ! - i \ iN; , NS 1.05. _ / /` l , of 1 \ / 1 t / 4 0 / �/ j \ - / , - '- �® _ / ,_ T - 23�'�0 S 1 / I - 12.42 Q� \ T O cF Q \ J /� , _ , , 1�.$M 2.04.0. r \ FT � � .- \ � \ 24.27 I - .I ^r,. I 1 \ �• , \\ 9�� - , s m T' I / - \ \ <�, y i `I 15.79 / i O ! c , / 1 cr s. ?v _ l r \, \ \ T - 24.00 �� ti / ! \ \ 11.01 / / ,. / 4 _ I \ _ 1. NMH 4.06.0 : - \ �.• \'' `. T 22.25 1` ;., � l / ,r, __` \ ., -,.� ,' 1111-'1"' ,- ?'.,ri' - _ :� „�? / �� 'r ! \ - �, I - 13.91 i \ ,r - - e / .c. \ .C9) f C v `per - - \ j t t / t -.�' t /' ,k,. ::mss �_ '.�, , � w i r a \ - r \ -11 / 1 ° \ 1 /. n / . . �= C - - X', - N,- \ \ c - / !, / / o ! 1 , a \ /: \ I n c1� .117 4.0 <2 �l. " rl1 1 1 F \ , l J N , y. \ ti F 1111. \ r, ,1111. / i x / O 21. 3 \ r I - i` T f 1 17:53 n, / , � ,o � 11.11 a• .> o: SM 2.03.0 „ / i, / / X, s' -P _ 1\ oy ,- �' C L 7 3.13 i' \ c�^ / < F / PFJ B LI ' - , TING ' XIS � ` � � - � rx I -115.37 \ F ti _ -- ! � %," - / b, ! pF r / , . ' r \ �' Y, I PPLY-.,FAC �' Y I ^6 I / o O " { 1 / \ ..11.11 _, , ! o ' / / „ ,.�, 1111 _- z; _� 1111 1111 '\ '_. � .-' _�-; -_, ;:. I / --- / J \ I t / . r \I y' \ 1111 , I I i A�° - Q y t NS H 1 0 x t o 0. / w t -, I T" 19.,85 - [ , \Q / 0' \ q {O \ \ 11 a, _ _ '' r`s' - '' 4 ,° t 4.0 U \c ' T_------- t 17:77 ' / N _ NCB21:85 .,z v _ f Q .� ® ��v �� // 5.3 � , / 1 NCB 2.0 __ �o \ ^. / _ 1111 \ 1111 - ----- \ r. , :- ' / 1 , ! I - .5 i ---- - F '°io / z ,y 2 - / s, ,, 4� / ' o \ / ( 2110 ® \ a5 ` f, D M �F ;a \ + is / , _ I / •`v: /,' t{.- _ - e ^Ty� , - // 5 o- \ ..1111 ,:. , .' / - , r" r / ; i " RETE _ I _-. ,+ i _ \ / 0 \ _. CONC / z1 560 - ; 5.1 , � T \ --- BLOCK BUILDING % - - / o - .. , N P1PE ® 6".a:r j I - 17.37 N,W I ,- \ 0 -� i/ \ 1 _ PE _ / I 12.20 E, �� I l -- ',) ✓- \ • / _ t t t / 1111. - Y 4 N0 - u, -I / u ! ® - i �„ t / ,-" \ 109 / / . p \ _.< \ I / 10.600 _ , �' ,'1\(CB 4 - . <a'^ // i i `` a - - 65 \ /�\ 1 0 60"1..,, - / , y ,� DPE 9f ,.,�-� �,.,�.,,.>- 7 � 1111 \ / , 1111// 0 , \ F : .a. t I - 12 NC 4.05.4 - u� \ - \ _ -- - - � 3 _ �<, -- / rte. i .85 1 / \ I NMH 4.04.0 -- _ // __. , w: �,. <: _NMH 3 0 _ ,= � - NSM 2.0 �S .a 20.19 0� , v / " T - NSMH 2.0 �41 - a // 3 \ 1a o .� x- _ _ 0• _ _ / Qi I 1 / i ", T - 19. I 12.20 = 1 - �_-, O' // 4 �, v - , A _ ._ ^ I _ T- 20 C V I _ �T,,r 2�J'.85 -� ! �1111 -, i �� .;Fn , I - it. �' PV r _ 1 x4.87 _ _ _ \ I �� - oti 49 p O L - S NCB Ot - - - ¢� I �m 7 c� -_ a -- -- / 7 \ I - / -_ W -- / ' Z3 ,,9 . ; I 111.74 __. / a - \ / ' v I d, , - - O _ _ _ - -- vase - i , t / --- n . - _ 1 - _ ---- - / _ 5 ----•- i :;:: 1 i t •.. . i a. - • / 1 / _------_ .. A ,, ,., ,-11..11 VC ® 0. ',�F� / _- -_ �,y,,A,: I :t 164 _� I+- . 1 5 _ v 1111 , t �� o 1111 / _ - ---- - v , 3 - - / :"/ 1 �.{r 5� �1 I t -, ri_ _ , 1111 , 5�i C F 1 '/. I / /�,�, /,, - ----5- �I I i�' { � >/ 16 v,/ I i - // - / �/ --- i1 ?i - / / r ' / /,,, ,/ - , t ;, i i NSMH 1.03.0 _ __ /, 1 , , _ // / /, %/ I T - 19.25 I , /" _ / ;/ , -- I = I - - / 1,, , ;' I 13.60 E 1 /� / ;/' ./ I I II�!i I = 1,.29 N,S I - , / /, ' �i r r rr �� - / / -' i, ;' 1/ l `� - / /' I -' �yr<;i/;; /� 1 _- - --- I �� / / - � :. -- - --- /: /! /, -� tV �� - - / ,; ;ii tr f ;�5 - � • , v_W - - - Qe `w _ 4 _ I i /; 1111 t' _ _ Ca , _r - - -- _ ;� -L�- - - , . ��._-..- --' - - �R - �� 1111 . ' •- ,' - --- - --- I _- _ _._ __ /I.I -- - f - - Q Q �� c - - I ;/: - L 2/� // _ - \ / % _ r' / ', ` -- 0 1 X00 4 _ rr^^ , �'Y � A // ,j 1111_ - -"- "- , „° r ` ® UOrr ME -- 4". v 1 - - -- � ! , 1111 :._ / , -. _ 1111 _._ ;" �- _ / , ---- -- - . - S E WEfi N // -- TARY W S AN _ R 1� _ _, - __ _- NIS C` ,- '`;� i -- ; �Y -nom , 1 I - < Te 2 - " - --� I"; ai 23:pp STAR -� -- �:., o / I 0 -- �� i �F _ �W ----_-__ - - P S �ATION a c _ / SUM T \ / \ / 1 _ w s G C / l 7 J / » \ <, SMH', .02.0 =23 1111 �� o F�` K / A o T = 18.2 �� / C� EW , 4 SANITARY , i / / --- - \\ _ \ v ' rrt C.p. No.1 SEW ,R FORCE M AI I' _ r� v -_ vv \ �� "7-0 OF 8' VC /' \\ GREEN \ _ \ 11.11, \ t\ , o... r, - __ „ _� r 1 � 0.40% , � , , i, n. - - - - - " �r I;. I t 1111 V ` A\- i --- - l - / _ - _ _ - ----- �- --r -----T=------ ----- w'1 I ------ .1111_ - �,' qY"FCS'! �', I _ +�� - -,� . 278°)OF 4" SDR18 PVC PIPE �- - / r '. , NC 2 a e ' ' - - __A-_M r s _ - - O 1------- T-� , - r -Y .� : ---� -' ,• -_0-_- ___ T - .75, _ - ,... - ' 11.11 9 ..-vey,v�'vYv'v-wti-v�'v vti .-v�'tilvyv-�r.�.v -.. -.___. `'H 117i Ir �_.. I _- - l\ �O pvPE v r ,, f '. , // _ r �. .� P �,,. u �. �., - -- 1 /` '--_'- - �0i / - 20 N / i , / NCB .0 1 / - /NSMH 1.0 .0 T = ,7.7s ,// \ \ ,/ , _ 1 12 60 / / / 1 - 2 v r _,_ i / / Z - , r , j 0 W t\ 65 4�-�� - , 13.137' , 20 - -- / , , r W I I '. '�' O V � it I I - I i' \\\ V I Q C 1 O - ` r l �` - ��_� A\ , I I O f I v t I �� I_ \I W t I I U I 1 \\ �` \-1 /\ 1 \ . i O i - \\ \ O 1 _ t \ + I I \ I �\ 1 , I I 1 \ \ - - -- - - - - �� -�' 0 _ '7 \ o I - - -- _ - - -- _ : u - --- , y . , - � I I I v - , �/ _- \ - / 1 ti I� \\\ -a - L, \ t \ / , 1 p ' 1111 / t - ; - _ _ , - r l 1 \ CCD , v � \, - -. _ _ I I L- I A �''\ 1111 v �, - - +, , z v O / O '' I i- - _ - _ - _ _ N _ - \ , + ,` U \ J \\\\ - - \ ` _ �t.-^� , V A - - - - - - - , I , -r - _ r _ - - o _ t a u , f - \-\ - . _." - �� 1111 _ . y r, �� / .:.. o v ' ' __ i - / -, , ••' : - _ ___ . 4 ___ 4 -' r - _ _ I _D - - - - _ ` W -_ _ _ -__, \`L. TO BE REMOVED v,v Z �\ o , , \ \ I - ,- - \ ' -_ - \ _ _ . , ;; \ \ I G I 4 -- _ \ - 2 \ _ . _ , _ 1111.,- I t O � \ - :1 1 i, 0 ! , s,` �� o A, \ ' - - .I a % I NCB 8.03-0 __ _ _ I _ \ pL: i_ t T = 16.60 \ _ - -- - -- -- - i / 0 1 7 I = 12.36 L 1 r 1 ® I NC& 8.03.1 I - I , t - �: I - - - W I I , 0 O ;. I T =:16.60 _ 4 - _ : 1 - I - 1 =12.60 1 1 I - t I t I I I I / ---- - - W L 0 !n g , U1 - - , I _ f - f 11 . 11 . . , - - I r 1 --�{ \ / , I - _� , ., t , f o:_ // - � / . W , / I / _ , , �- / I i - C�D t 4 e r - =1 / I l - - - /' I _ - Il � Avg �/ -v\V - __ a _ v - O 1 a -S , ., , r ��; \\ O I • v _�� CD , �I _ W I h '\, - \\ _ _ _ � ., D „ \ " - \\ . I U , , I , / / 1 0- , �\ ._ - , ,-,, t v O / \ f / 1 ¢ - - ,. _ - ,: , , 1111 � r a / a , NMH 8.02.0 20 �7 I - - I T = 15.65 , 1 i - ,i C r I I = 11.24 - �� - - - : L - (p 1} i ; --, �___ �v `C . _ I _ - C I ( \I - ��` r+ O f. \\ I - 1 .' v v I / __ _ -._ / \ J Q 1 _ . - _ O v V v - 00 Q - 1 : 1 �\ rn t I LEACHING SYSTEM "B" \\ Cn _. I I -- ' i 11 � _ \ O 1 / \ - t „ , (8) 10'0 x 7' DEEP POOLS � I-+- t z. __ /; LIFE CARE COMM NITY I : 0 I 15 0 \� �/� t f , ' - ; I I - n -• \ , f. I w> t? - - - oo�° TO BE REMOVED _ _ . t I m I = 9.33 Y PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD / Ove t NEW "N I / NCB 8.01.1 0 _ oe� v � o,, ..' 8' WIDE X 3' HIGH \ \\`�� - = 10.40 _. . \� - -- At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD OE - \ _ - WATER / / __ s TIE IN TO LILCO #51 3a 18,0 �� 1111 - r -_ 20 Suffolk County, New York i METER I ;` / - ELEC TE �C CATV -- -� T ,4.40 I / r _ - 15 L I = 10.10 I WATER , / D- L•� �- �_ __ - _ I �: - � WALK 1 METER �/ ��..�,�� - - O ONCRETE SI _ I ` _ - ,, `____� -- - -= - Suff. Co. Tax M loo0 35 , 1 I 25 l _ 1 - p 4 7; _ .�:. - -- -- District Section Block Lot _. _ - __ _ - _� - _ : ,-_ - I 11.11 .. ,; :. , ., ,_. ,` "'__->-- ,,.� ---- _ - /V ' ` ..-:. 1111 y.+' --- -.-- ^"--� _ - -�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T5_ - _ - - - - - WM NYT 3675 -- - - -- - _- _-_ - - _ - � - -_ - - - --- - --- - - - _ _ __. -" - __ " -- -- ----- - _ , WATER MAIN - _ __ 1 N E E CURB - _ _ -- , -_ - W CONCRET I - _ 1111. 1 _ '� ,, , I - - --_._.I . �- " I CI COVER aril _ -- . O _� _ _ -" �:�- - - - - - - - ___ - - - - - - - - - - - -- GM - - - - - - - - -GM W. GM - - - - GM- - _--- ------- - - - - -- - - -- _- GAS MAIN _ _ _. - --- Y O I -------- 4 - {} ' NY? 361 - NYTo-360 O' _. - _ NYT-36fi 0. - - - -- - - - NYT 365 % % - - - - _' _ NYT 363.._ ._. -_ NYT-362 Q - - - _-. _ N T 67 n ._: __ , ,- --,- 364 _.___ _ _ - _ Y 3 _ r_t_ _._ 368 �-� - _ - -� -.� � _ �:__. _ �� I V - 1 - ' - " . - I ` 15 _ F _ . i 1111 ,- / (� I TIE IN TQ- ,EXISTING - - v . . F �: 11:11 -> GAS MAIN ,S S��CAN'�SU I 1-- ' . I \I _ N ., r - 0 i� z m cn .q , � - `�: = W _ �� NE SEP. 6, 2000 Z > - C �/��, o NOV. 24, 1998 - < JUNE 29, 1998 , AUG. 24, 1998 MAY 19, 1998 SEPT. 17, 1997 DATE : SEPT. 4, 1997 ZcS� �rw SCALE : 1" = 40' 6148`3 � � JOB N0. :97-290 - �FESSIGN�~ SHEET NO. :3 OF 13 Oi O "970290_sp-101" OF 13 Young & Young, Land Surveyors ` Get 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 uulttJ 516-727-2303 .4 a dung w Alden W Young, P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor y z Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer Kenneth F. Land planning John Sehnurr, Land Surveyor £nginrrring SEE SHEET No. 6 OF 13 �arorging • V13 s : �'- - - � r' - NMH .10.0� � r. / � T = 38.70/ �-Ca � ';( \ \ \ \ 4 \ \yC ( C T� �I / S COTTAGE T- ( CRY26. 26.2f /�' � , � A�EBO I _, EL.40.00 � r _.- �, _ _ , \ / - F / e- -� % \ \ , � \ '\� -_ Q"-�F -% �- 1 I I ECS _ � ",%�/ � �, a` >- x, \ � \ \ \, \. ' '\` r \ �� ,� '\ \ 'SV`' G \ \ / I • .t._.�" �•OQ - - r / /� STORY ' \♦ \ \ \ a. 26.25 1 V il, m NCB 1.08. p \ \ 00- , / •��\ I � � -r - i , } I = 33.25 i - - -_- / / _i y�g _ /T , 1/04; •. \ ''\ 1 � - . "' - - I /, \ �--`--=•�, \ \ \ 1 \ ./, i -_- , � 26.00 \ NSMH -1.17.1' /\ _ ' `" _;7d , '/ I \ ,C;"\�,' �i�" \ �!' _tom "� �O + \ \ ( !4 I 3S T - 37.75. - 23.50 s \ �//` \ \ I -L` - _ Q^ - - _ NCB 2.1 - \ r \ / \ \!1. 1 33_.75 / \_ \_ - - // 1 - - \` c 26.00 T = 26.00, s \ t yF \ 21.00 26.00 , M C� �• a, ".... I 33.70 �J'V 1 36 \ ;\ 7 //, p 6. _ 5°6 l 1 Q ' _ .� .r3• -�- _ NEW ASP A �R K I � ,';;; �'', A..�.. _ 0�:"8ti' _ _� ' _ I- A E� N�0..4 � 'O \� _ P _ /, ,� NEW MAS0�IRY IRETAINIING', ` � tc / >; / r (9ECREATION', PARKING-38 CAR"Sl `o' /•( (`4 �, -- * \ V 1.69 ?• !.,- /''J j'' -� _ ,' l / 1 \') 4 ^m a'D -- - �' �/ ��\ , / 1• f ,, l,' "Q' , .'�, ' 'I \ ��;- 1 - �. 1.17.2 .1, < -- � �'-,...,� - - r � o ,T-= 37.30' t. - _ NMH 1.08.1 zsr /. T = 39.20 \.� /P OF 7g° t = 30.61 S,E r 'J / �°\ i J / T = 37.50 m I x 33.46 I 35.20 .: \ _ .�,i E / \ ��- i 1 z 1 33:00 _ ® 4< A NCB 1.08.0 /' NCB 2.17.0 T 36.81 T 26.00 r l \\ \\ 1" ®�s I 32.00 / NCB 1.08.2 a I 30.45 N S 1 --- _ �>` _ NC6 2.15:2- 30-16 .1 NCB''2.16.0 / \ \ 30. S - 5 \\\ ;; • 39.40 - f \ i 1 1— 26,20 - NSMH•1".17.Q \ „ / i \ STORY \ FRAME T -36.7a / Ezc \ \ 1 ( 1 STORY FRAM ! COTTAGE 'COTTAGE E - \�� - '..__ ry' I !� \ - I/','- - ! T = 27.75, - 1 n-, I f1�' �• _ / �� -� T �-- , _\ ._ _� 21 / \�' `,� �, .\\ / �--4.1.0 -- r, b,: \ FF EL=41.00 i -_; +s a- 1 % '- �t \ �`:a PIPE ® 0.30 - • j` �'� --- ,` � I t TJr `� L- . - - ,.rte_ •rte `.- ! - '�,•/ ci�� \ \ - .,- I \ �_ .I•� - p.. I ! `X' � - �=�` 33:50 _- - ,/-:.=1_ - , , `yQ \ ,� �• �. ++ i ,�.. i,- < _<' F \. NCS 2.0 .2' _ _ =•F - -�T-____ •, � I I ''ti-. _ �, ( - �, '� GSC' "\ 1 - - - - '\ , \ � , - ;-- _-` � J? ��. ' --- "- __ - - '`0�,��((Q, -- . 04' \ -Jti'. - / ' ? -----'� 1 AS 11 !Y � t \\ G� J� /' 1 14.4 - , _ \\ - -_ --__-- / i 1`-' i \\ �', ` \-TL ``\.� _ �"�•`__ `- - �; '\ I ' 1' ,, B 1.07.0 \ ,«O --- t• /' aJ00� 30.09 N.S \ 4 3r. T 30.35 ,' zC \\ r\ 0 'tel ) �s{_- = \ I 3L25 w o 1 = 25:76 N,' -/ -� /' -- ----- / c� / - -' . : _ /,� 1 1 --20.23 $:E I sr -J - - -- - � ( I\ s ` NCB 2.13.0 \ .' OT - 1 SEFrARC�TECTURAL` T 31.75 -'THE DESIGN OF_TH€-STORM _ `\O r� 1, ti 1 20.07is SEWER THROUGH ANnIOR \ - UNDER .THE-PROPOSEO_ i3uu)1NGS.-"" 1' t 1 i ..t O�•/- I , /'> ` I 1 \ _ ' r ,~ - `t'' '! 6(✓ � / -^. _ \` - _ / , P cK-- \ ,._ N �?' ALT ARKING E '\-` /i ' i •`;,} 1 ' .r' l 'r PIPE �' 1.00,5 Y �- � - - (STAFF PA IN 64 CARS) \\ 00 23 - NCB \ 1 17.55 l X111 ' 1 I 31 75 \, !° v I \ l e / l .r ' / /' oz �' ^�- ` I 17.75 - - NCB .1 2\ l r , , C) `, \ /- I - o 33.ts °:Go - - / � ,_• r f _ ! ' I 1 17J5' / ,/ r Q, ^I ` " ' + ,, / t ! i - _'_1 ,+:y � ,4 i --_ 1, -- :v_-" r� 1 ` cn'; `•' '1 // ,n O/ !' .{ I 'I I 'I 1 1 'i 1 1 •I / j 'i A'', 1:.`s© :t \ ^ I ® 0.40% 1 35 35.00 ` NSMH 1.11.2 I \ v ° 7-a-32.25 F(pGE'' _ § o \ i o x �' T' I ( I _ \ - C01T AGE ,Sr0 i CO I v \ �s a "� 1 I 1 I 17.35 1 / t l RY FR - _-'-- / i `'\ m ' m j -s,, \\ 1 ,' \ COTT qMf O r - :o v'1 I 1 ' \ 1 - ( / q qGE STORY FRAME L o' I -- -1 -- N5MH 1.11.1 1 a. t 1 ST AGE `3� 1 T 1 8 COTT FF EL_ ® SMH 1.1.6.0 =` o I 13.�a,.' 1 = 16.95 N w 1 Q '�` o; 4.? T 33.60 °q - __- -' (\ 11 ' 1 ` '" \ +\' 1 16.90 S.E" 7 0 \ 1 J i = 29.04 N \ -- 0 - Q �i I = 25.47 S,W i \ Z. S \ py�1 \ i / L. �L=36.0 C.- / r- I'l�\ \ I 1 '•�'I \\. `S`� ', \ ;+� r7, PE OF NCB 1.06.2 NCB 1. 0 '' ® o.3oq NCB 2.12.0 v' T i T = 33.23 T = 31.75 b \ - �. \ \\ \ ,/ GU - PARKING-25 1 - 29.45 >' I = 27.01 _�' I 27.75 W W - -- 26.6 S - I 1 N 2 _ ! 962 ,S \ - rN \ o NCB 2.12.1 NSMH 1.16.1 / -- 1 / ' 'I 1 % T 33.15 T = 35.00 1 y :-, 1 _ si- 1 = 7 I 25.98 33. 0 r .� 3 l \ ' NCB 1 06.5 T',= 32.25 - 8 OAO m..., 2a \ \ \ \ RAM 1 \ - of j PE ® :_- /.\ + RY F i / I 28. �i" \_28 PI ar O \ `iy ' ------- 25\ o c',-r r _ m - ! w \ AGE \ _ C 92 OFA$, r I \r \\ �5.0o____ - - - _ .� \ 1 H 2.09.0 NMH 2.08.0 `• - '` 0� ---- E,._ •.,•_,.-,_,.� r •-, 3.00 '•T 7 i.in« 0.4 - \ \ cs _ � -- `� .PVC - .E ® - T 33.25 ;\ - "@ x P \ - - 8 y- 1 ---- _.37.00 - - o' c., PEP a o - _ I F EL _,__! t - i --'" \ ., - '-� rl HO �� I 27.12 W F r �- `� 2:50`• tB @ - r �� E• •� - \ i i i\ - SMI 13(3' __ o� 1 / i, M i - d, - - \ -- - - I i - -- - *"' -- - .7 ,i O - T -27.7 _ I NMH 1.06.3 ---- - - -- - - - - - I i7 5 I ��=."',�::...-. � , _ '� - T = 34.55• / \ -� \Y PL/ i Y v <- I 16.2 -- 3 f , f 4 - • , ,- t- , � ' 27. 9 - 1 - -- - _- - -Pti�APl�•2 -- _ Tv-.- -. , , r -__-__-- _ / ... - G g"p-PSC -,..,. - >_ - . - T - 4. 101'•OF - t";.,.. u'r" 28.00 18.79 W 1 I - '' - J, i _ r " 1.0 .4 13.48 S.E \ T :32.25,, - ®� _ ': rte. y j _ _ ? \ � �- 1 J" _ \ _ - r� .rte"` ' ---,-T _ - Y`a- \ / I 28.01 ` OF \ : ', `,, - �, r - I I �,- 't •1 1 �', RPM , `\ cr ''1 r• -' •_ - --.-- �F1 - - c :�:: ,J=^.<x..-i- �,` _ ;'�� ..g.. -- -- -� 1='PIPE- _ --- - ( - ,•�Q- - , ! __----- - -- T� 0 -- 3 I 99.26 "---- - - -- / -- -- ��'w - - -�a:-.•i;;>.,�-< - �-' oE. > 'i'"' � `, /-"�%' _ " _ - _ _\ g y I', Y FRA t �' h a \ a. __ _- 1- --- �----- -�-= , -� •\ - - c- -- \ TOR 1, - -- - \ ,< ! - \ I \ 1 E �, ,r, FRAME 11 a : - - _ .:;. - 1 a"' _ I_ --- -/ - - ., . , J+-:v,-� - �- \ { 1 I ,OTTAG `-- . NSM 1.16.2 1 _ ., TORY '\ "� ,-°'a - \ LO T 3 .70 „ \ SCOTTAGE E1,_�6 0 - / '" /` NSMH 1. 20` \ \ I 9.89 \ �Y �' �:t' ( �tjw -G _ T 2575 /�- 1 1nf - - - - = 6 �� s C� -C _ _ ! - _ -- ! --Q�= _ -�%-,(�. / r o _3 -' -34.0 _ - V 80�� - t a7' of a"m PVC_* o • "0 PVC -80% ...., I NSMHA.1 NSMH 1.1 b.0 W TT 24 O _ - ` T = 23.4�i w _ r = 15.7 ' FRAME + , "_-.- - I' 17.Y3 / r 1 /� STORY FF ,_ _ = ., - NSMH 1.15.0 2R i.,;•� - ! �� _ COTTAGE _ / i i _ _ NEW MASONRY" RETAINING / - ' �_ ,. I i = 2484 N ;r NSMH 1.14.0 + ,� -- -- -- // _ = 20.13 S,E T - 32.0 /' _ WALL, ,- o ` 1cn 4 NCB 1.05.0 = _ .- _ 4� , 3, Iy,EW'MASONRi"_ETAINING , 1 NMH 2.0 t \\ -35.00 % ? _ -- I 18.y ! ! _ - - ! - r � c �' y \ r 23.70 _ L- __ I UJI 26.1 -N / \ F T 30.93 .S / !!, // % \ 4. 2.36 \ 1 F E �" I = 26.70 W - / ! a/° 3-" , / WALL NO ,,, `\ \ 1 = 17.69 - NCB 1.05.1 - �' - - \ \ W _ \ T = 30.95 �/ \ (/'� - \\ - - 1 = 26.95 e / ' / - ' i ,! o_--�./ \\ ( i - , ; -- .\ \ NEW MASONR o � --_ ,. \ _ ----- � � _ �,`; -; - ' _ - t ` . NCB 2.10.1 T 20.25 /' /'/ ,/' \\. _ / - WALLS NO.s. \ ° I 15.01 \ / \ - r T \ -cam= , a I _ �[OR!l s\ 0 \-__ � 1 r'J / ,� / x r :•\ / / , / ' "1 . j `_--- I r •1. E 0 7j ! ;7i / 'I/ i:•w >!. / _ ,-v- \ - - , .. . . . , FRA i '% �. ! i / r 1 , __ ;/ .. . `�...�` •i .... / 1ST _ - ORS FRA OZTA / / / 1 ' ME-" C r'I r;g3.00fCB 2.10.2 &I 20.25 r+ tj, `\\ `_ I 1':• _ \ FRAME �'', 15.25 STAGE \ FF <' F E1- 1 1 \ / / C 3.00', lr NSMH 1.15.1 ; t _ `\ I, f� 't , .r -� _ - '� � � T = 28.75 - Y/ t / •'/ r ;: - I' \ \ /1 = 20.80 I \ -.24.75 NCB 1.04.0 \ \ r ( 1 \ 1 r T = 28.42 I �_ EXISTING NSMH o l t = 25.66 N 1 \ 1 / { ,1 I ,' = 29.60 I g I 19-19 S - 21.45 0441 WETLANDS \ \ N I t / CP ^m OPE \ � `\ -'�� '\ `\' j j i i I \ --_ 165 L _ �, ,a N PIPE � � , WETLANDS OF r 1.04.1 \`\ - - 3.10 •' \ \\\ 1 1 i + 1 ; _ ETLANDS \ \ ! FRAME NSM_ 1:`1 ��` 0,40 - r ®o " �'� � = 28.05 -_ \\ 'I I �\ } :.r COTTAGE ;_26.34 Pv� ® a = 24.54 E,W N ',W1 I STILT ;PENCE 8c HAY B A 24.5 - E 1 ILES G 2 23 1 \\ A \96 OF g 0 ®O 4btf y i 1 $ N , \\ r \\ \I' !\ 6 :m NoE'P'PE1 NM , 1:04. TO 'BE '.ST I(\� F�LACE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION FF EL-28'00 _ \\ Zoog OF ,a i ==29.z°o ACIVITYi NCB NOTE \ 1.04.4-, Y FRAME \ _ \ r ; r 1 1 1 ' 1 t ► _...- I/ / // \\ T =_26.00 \ \- 1 STS? \\ I = 22.00, - - ca1TAG gip\ \\ 11'. 1'•, \�', FRESHWATER WETLAND '; r +c BOUNDARY AS FLAGGED BY r 32 JEFFREY JEFFREY SEEMAN OF COASTAL `\ \` \\ ENVIRONMENTAL V I R N i , 2 7 `, _` 1 1 ,' • 0 MENTAL CORP. AND 7.6 t - ro'' ' ` \�\ APPROVED BY NYSDEC ON �, 5 TORY FRAME4-7-98. 1 5 AGE - ' FF EE=2 I ' '•_ y F F, ,3 � \ _I; ,_ � - °°' ', ''I - \�t_ 1 `, 1 \ \ \ \ r I I r , ,- I - g �`_ C)� O'`'`P -- \ / ,' \ - \ .1) '' N � 2 ';;"." - ---_ r•4 / a / .._ �' '\ \ \ \ \ '00 �, \\`' \\\\ r, I , + I 1 / 13 C STORY FRAM / \ NEW ROC1C'.�A?wl�a\iF,; 3 NMH- 1:03. - - 4 1 - - - / T 2.68-- - , - 2 R r _ TZ5 EL-18.00 / 1 _ _ I , _ � ! 'EL_ 00 - - !`t :i 'NCB 1.03.1 1_a ls:3o - =Y=22.28 - - _ -- _ ----- \\ �\ WEIR '€6,15.00 / FF _28. _ (� ---- - - �N EW_ P0N D_ N 4 ` { a NCB 1.01.0 � E7 21:75_ " - I WATEF�'SHRFAE�-El 15. - I C&G ' \ I 17.75 - n / - xRIV =m' - - NEW ROCK HEAD WALL-NO 1` ,I \\ SINE WITH - - CGntPA TED / I - II ,'ASP/f=1LT c - `\ -- - T.= 800- -2. i \`-TOPSOFt-OR- CLAY- _. - -- - _ ---- - _ ls.ao '�_--- -- _ - � N / 1 i t - _ 24 +q�EpIPE � 2.g � LIFE CARE COMMUNITY T.=_22.11- ! _ / - ,- / , � 1 � -. -__ - - , 1�- -- ` 1-= 18.84 t - t' _ ; ... •'i \ �, _ _ _ r PECONICLANDINGNhW T�vIN PIPE,- ._ -�•,. AT SOUTHOLD NCQ 2.04.1 22.80 of SOUTHOLD I , Suffolk oPORT New York - /NE4 R�CK,DAM NO. 2 - I _ -_ 1 _ � � , / \ � " -.;♦� _ � � � • 1 - _- ---- Suff. Co. Tax Map: 1000 35 1 25 SOP EL= 0 \ ' ! 1 �r�" MH 1 _ r , ��,t 07.0 District Section Block Lot WE \� , - 23. 3 I r T , SITE PLAN 1 : NtW _ - / i a �Y7.00 V - ^- „ _ I � _ -- _ a, ,, ;�' •/ ! r' - r ,'' , , ; '; \ + �� -- '�. . k /' - I �. - LI M l.T' OF-NEW .. - 1 WETLANDS-- Z.02.1S $ 1 FQ 12 !!A 1 1 / ' f 1 7 ;1, i I Y 1 ' /: ---- 1 1 \ -_ - \- { , \ T a 16.75 - I Q' L I�4V /' ' i- I { ` ' \ `\ \ - \�J -\ --- - 1 1 8^ , r G NMH i SEE SHEET No. 2 OF 13 SEE SHEET No. 3 OF 13 � NE�/ SEP. 6, 2000 C. AUG.O24, 1998 ®! MAY 19, 1998 SEPT. 17, 1997 DATE : SEPT. 4, 1997 - - f SCALE : 1" = 40' 0 2cf� JOB NO. FO 614& SHEET NO. : 4 OF 13 C � , 970290_ p1 0_ O1 F 13 ---- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- - s Young & Youn Land Surveyors 9 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York f 1901 516-727-2303 Alden W. Young, P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor 21 tZ'i Thonuw C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor John Schnurr, Land Surveyor SEE SHEET No. 6 OF 13 *Ummine 7 ?6.0 j Q11 N1 Z �4 I STOR�Y"FRAME i I---- i I I/ : / __ / , - - -- --, ,, 1! , 7 S !�tlr AGE *Y C f fit,- W FRAVE 7 _2 FF =--4,0,,00 ZEBO /A I F, Lct y 519.00 ,C(3! y P V07-r, A 7Q j 00" r_b NC 8.4 A� NSMH T =5,�37.75 -7, J� 3 A_ 26. 1 3 75 �q j T 26.00,,/ �7- fk,l 0 % I, , 26.00 4.., j op Q� V AL I jAiRK[ No4 N MASONRY11 Ati'H 7 E Z I�CREATION N V 38 CA 40 , 0 113 1.17.2 37.3G__' 4 39.: MH S E ok 1. 8.1 2 7' 8-0 T 37,50 W4 I 35.-ZO (90 B ICB 1 j 40,- T T = 36.81 I = 32.0 W 0 30.4 40 NCR -216.0 T = 37.25 I = 32.83 7-7-30 T = 7.75 35 = = 20.72 39.40 STOR NSMH_1-j'7._y FR �ME 1 STO Y FRAME I IAGE 1 20A6 ------ ------ co UAGE 5 1 20 64 21 24 ! FF .66 Fl" EL=41 00 1 14 A d 0 35.75' I0.09 N,S 10 31;25 W 1 --,20.23 %E ROTE ------ NUEs 2JI& T = 31.75 SEF-ARCHITECTUR-AL F1ANS--FOR I = 20,07 OF-THE- TORW -THE-DESIGN (A SEWER, Ti4R0IJGH AN OR PROPOSE -UNDER-THE BUILDINGS.-- EY -- B NE 0 'FF PA ALT ARKING ARE rA I IN 64 CARS) 00 17.55 C, 1, 7 T = 35.75 -1 17.75 I = 31.75 NCB 33.15 8.31 11 17 751/-r-\ OF 0 0.40% 1 _T1 N 35.00 1 17, 5 T -,32.25 FRAME N.$MH 1.11 STORY COTTAGE SMH 1.16.0 T 33.60 I T6 90 S,E; 18 -19 az 00 29.L)4 N 25.47 S,W 36-00 FF 7 C, PF OF I 71' NQB 2.12.0 N QIB 1. 0 -PAR G 25 T = 31.75 KING 25 I = 27.75 W �b' I = 19,62 N,S NSMH 1.1 .1 T 35.00 27.96 T 33.15 25.98 NCB, 1.0f 3�.25 Y 77 gORY E28,125 H 2.08.0 28.90 6.1 T 0.40 _T = 33.25 FF Ej_ ' 37.00 1 = 27.12'EW 6' 17.75 :0E PIPjE T 16,26 1 27.49 OF 10I;,OF I M�W t 13.48 S,E N U. 9 777 N -Y NS 1.16.2 FRAME LO 30 I AGL 1<1 WH 00 EL=34,00 z A 8"0 PVC Q A4 1 B7' OF NSMH 1.16 UJI LU T 24.00// T R aft"w- STOp NSMH 1.15.0 2L NtVVM,AS0NRY' RETAI COTTAGE NING T = 31.35 I = 24.84 N N VH 1.1 A :3 14 1 = 20.13 S,E T NEWMASONRI' -PETAINING 0 5.00 T 23.70 ALL_t 0- UJI FF EL=3 T = 30.95 I = 26.13AS 12.36 I = 26.7D W 0 NQQ Ld T 30.95 'EWMASON 1 26.95 R NQB 2 0 .10.1 'WALLS NO.s, 1 15.0. CD "Wm 8"Wm T 0 C0 k ^Yl 00 To RAAfE 3.00 CO177A I F Q8 2,10.2 = 20.25 = 15.25 FF Oa NSMH 1.15.1 0 -00-- 7= 28.75 1 20.80 1 75 NQB 1.04.0 7 = 28.42 1 = 25.66 N EXI STING 1 20.43 W 9.19 S 29..60 21.45 WETLANDS [)PF P1 I I t -- ill LIMIT OF 5�1 0 NMH 1 04 WETLANDS CO11 ACE 2( 54 E,W N .,_;[LlT /FENCE & HAY BAILES I �22. 24.55 N 'TO \13E '.S�,T IN; ,'qLACE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION 4. =i-29.05 7 21.20 MNOTE NWC 183 1. -26.00 22.0u_ FRESHWATER WETLAND BOUNDARY AS FLAGGED BY JEFFREY SEEMAN OF COASTAL 32 N D ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. A 57. APPROVED BY NYSDEC ON SIOR 4-7-98. P 5 f <<1 -2 E:_SIO N V'RQ -9AIQ IN Ci. 3 E 0C T -22. R EL 8.0( 2- -------- 01 2.28 W 5,00 POND -NO- _,N_�--W -4 NCB 1.01.0' T- z-7 I" �1, I I - WIT NE )ML&_N6, LINE -_H -2 � T -19.00- TOPSOIL- OR LA-Y- 17.7 /H�EAJI 1 00 -DR I fl�E V� HDPE PIPE7 LIFE CARE COMMUNITY 18.84 NEW --TWIN PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD It NCB 2.04.1 T = 22.80 I = 18.80 At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York i- m 40. 2 � R DA Suff. Co. Tax Map: 1 1 1 25 0 District Section Block Lot I T S1 TE PLAN 00 4P LIM[T OF NEW I i, 4. WETLANDS- )LA' NMH .................... ...... SEE SHEET No. 2 OF 13 SEE SHEET No. 3 OF 13 NE SEP. 6, 2000 NOV, 24, 1998 AUG. 24, 1998 MAY 19, 1998 SEPT. 17, 1997 DATE SEPT. 4, 1997 S ALE : 1" = 40' JOB NO. :97-290 SHEET NO. 4 OF 13 614 "970290sp1 01 OF 13 ---------- ------ -- - -- O _� 'i v Young & Young, Land Surveyors �n7o Y¢mE 44uung 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 �, 516-727-2303 `=`s 1�,, G��r 40uug Alden W Young, P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) :1 a Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer lanning � Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor John Schnurr, Land Surveyor ii:nginerring SEE SHEET N o. 7 OF 13 - fi�urnrying -- 42 // //' // , / ; 1: I I ��i,'JI !/ c' _ ''n i / /lb I" / / /,il 1',\VI/- _ r:'- _ % �l'\ / \ \ ,, .._"'N \ ,� ,\`\ t (C / i ,yam---- \ ! /. / 1 I' I %/, / 1. -/_ /11 s� \\ \' -\ \ ` '\\ ', :} �a_ \- % I 21.41 v ice- ➢ < 1`' I ',I f/ / 1 I i /, _ /, r \ �'. `L �/ \ \ O/ l.r �' m �/ -- ----NCB 4.18.2 m Q 3 k /r /! / I --_ -- /r 1',' -j I \ \ } 1 l / + - _- ----- ---® ::9 » - �' I I,Q I /, N1,AH'_A n 0 1 I � / r NCB 4:19.1 fi i,, ,,I1 / i /r I \ T, 2$.00, - I �` u ` \\ - 1 i,\\_ / / o T 28.7 • ?R a,. iT i / T 31.25 \ O M ,I / I r \I = 5.11 y Z1 I v l I f i �\ \ 7, \ \ '//' 1'1, ' I / '® I - 2 �t,> -- /--v - - 9 I 27.09 6�afo O r^ ,Q tt N SILT /' I _ ` _-___; \\t \\ =t 5 ' O Q s-, L EW FENCE & HAY BAILES / V Q - h� a I -, // 1 \T1 4 �rr' I i' / \`' Y' \ �� \ \� \ \ L' sa - /i G 30 4 -;;xi.. 1.007. NCB �. / % / //, I I l'. 'i< , � I t", , I / / - 1\ 1 - - \ NSMH i I - - // j r: ® }68% r -- __ 1 TO $E SET IN PLACE PRIOR TO ANY i' , ' - - <' \ 1 t;_ ', ,' t 2.09.2 a r r' m "E p1PE -- T = CONSTRUCTION / .,/ , / I/ a �� "� �' ; R:1 % _ \ a` _ - - -- 2ss m �O �6-,a' m HDP _ 31.25 , . ACTIVITY / / // i :I // :! / I l/,' -ter' // G j I \ \ I t L- w� �7 1 i I T _29.70 « 1r // i J L 80' OF 18 I 27.25 ;1 I / / '1/i r r1-, •; 1 ii ;I '•� ..i V // ,, \ / I / )' r \' ' , -1:�- j y , \ I 23.16 �� } { / ' ', // ` Ab , , ) / '/ /! - "b`- JJ ti !' �(//�/ _ '1 I \\I"`',\�_►� /' `>+`? ,\,\ \. -\ l '`^-,�� _ it Ir.. I 1 ;l ��`' NCB 4.176 �{ !' j r: j-I 36.00 �' t ''f 1 rl / / , `,� o, �CJ , n -�' ti. ' ' •, l I a� / N�B/4.18.0 J` / / /' /2`" r ;r/j III % OnYj' / 4\r \ .\,, \ ��\ % ' ^ ,'T = 28.75 / > i I NCB 4.18.1 // ' I - : / /' / O i' �' J' i \\ -, - 1 'I[1 � _5.' `\``- , \ I 2 66 / I - -- r _ / /I / /. ••/ - ! ! j ` i /`` - tip._,' ' 'vJ<¢• / , i NMFi�3.0 2 '� , I •II,`,i i < \-,- �,x, �'' \ .I ,h, / v� �+ r - T = 29.75 ' t" T = 29,75 /\ _ - ------ - .. , / ! (, / / / ,'I/ / T -- - ---r ..c/ r "�f �- 'T --�50 _ /l;lt\! ;/ - I , - / , j i I = 21.27 I 21.}1 / , \ / / /, / � ,_ /if' ' ' G - �`__ --- / rQ / 1` U- 18.74 -- - /r// \ /-- i / / / •1 O. \_`1t \ / 1 ' ' if / - \\ , ',,,' > ';' , ,' r, i;{ / 2*r- --- -_, 1 I\_ ,� / _ moi. '\ ( '� \� _ •�.-' a NSM '* / / / I v / ,�- /' _ - ,_ -_ --`+ 41 `"� -` - i O t t \ ;' 1 a.. H 2.10.0 - '1 \ \ / / // / I r /' r. -- __-_ - _ _ oho \,. / _r /' k; / \ \ �c� _ c� f' '^ , NSM_ H o. I -- 'I / _ , \ (% '/ / / /'/%i; s I _- <.. . c �.__ `\ -- o�,r � ,, ;.. e \ r _ 1 - i �. 7 = 31.60 - r" cn �\ // / / . // c. / _ •-'h::`® - \ �\ '� ca T. 0 / _ T 29.90 I 14 r 1 / / /" / /% °r' i G\ c, \ r t- \ \- Y F" I 22.48 3 q IL- �, / / ( \' - \ (0�O \\ / '/ , NCB 3:04.1 =^, - Fes,\ SHa / I - �_ _ -,� �\ / •r / ^L r / -;� - --- '\ _ i 4_ - \ 1\ - _ '\ �\ �- '9 - -`,�,�• - , p`�a.,...< it r I. I r - C..r '•'+-C /' t \\ // ♦ ,:'/ / ?� /;; i l T = 21.75 - - ` / \\ j. '-�, _ (: /I' • 4 W _ i -� \/� �1 /r \ // / / l /r'/,, F _ \ � (. 't CV, _ - ®° J r' i \ v G7 i \' \ // I - 18.57 - -> -- � -- ,.� \ v --'1.1 r 4"' ... i' 2y _ t Ii / \ i �' / .•' f• •t 6 :/'/ ' ,! / f' % / /' - ` / - - -,,� ^ate,-' W=; t I I i / rr \ �\ \ Vii' •1• / < I I - '/// /r• , /' / / a.`\ !` '\ 1 , r ''� �\'�� n _ - _ _ -_'..,L ✓ �. i O. ! " - i r�, 11 F. / NSMH11.09.4r /; f, ! - a' �- --� -- 29 So $,�' / -T I (n I \ �� ----ii - '\ ,•/ _ /' ,, '-i-..- -/-,w {`-1,1 I \ .u, %r - -` - �-t -i' < /, .x 3 - 1 I 'p, �� - - i 1�' I T 3 .65 / ), r y I i - - a < �Y I 1 f.,y ro 1 N \\`• \�\ / . , 1 30.51 �, I NOTE f' i� i` -% 30 x_ 't, 6'pp"� /I f ) W Cr: , - ---_ G / '/' / SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR t„ t; \ \' - -' - _ NCB 4.17.1 �'' �' C>� ;. - I ,\• •'t --_ , -i / a /// I 1 r I r'., -,' <-,.,�+-+_• ,_•.n..,_,--s_e..,',-�_\.>_r-• .'..�""� _-_ • p/' I-,:,. FT /• /' i'' r 19, _i 1 I I <- ---- 6 / I= /,' % e/I / I1 THE DESIGN OF THE S ORM \ / *8T r' - -- --___- s _ - O •C\ t, - "�.1-_ �- T 28.75 i /,_ C I t ' i I --e, _ �'\ 1- // SEWER THROUGH AND OR r' \ / i / \�•:\ -+�' ` ,--,i--,._ • - - f;r- _ J ! I ! - -- r I \ , -i- - - * / /'. r / ,®1 - -, -�- I 24.50' I S .6,• �.. Cb'! FAIRWAY• \ _ -_ - - /: / UNDER THE PROPOSED / - - -Z. / --� • .,-�, �,; ---- - - .F\� / / /. '/ / I / ; 4 O i , ---� _ --,-Y- TS 1- --_' > I / l - - OF '1 ^" r - ;C-4 i �• / , BUILDINGS. r. ? i - T - - -_4 8" - ' Oy l -- _ 0 \C .t-- \ p t, �4 4 a l' 1 ,a , \ ___ .--- _ - NM 3.15 '/ „' , / / s' , .-\-.--,-r,-�r,._, RY ,\- L--DF pt % s y', - --- - _,27 i j ice'/ ;, II - �Tq q - 1 4 - o a \ ' _ .._ --- ---- - -__-.'15 - - }. > } / , / i / , "-� /'I {/ �iE` \ i` _ ip '\1 Ii'` �p�` 09" / % ® \ ',1� , ! -" -------- _ ` r - \ j /I / IVC 3.04.3"i F , \ -,' _ __ I\ d- - F/p� r t v �- \ I t . ' \ \ - __--- /pj /( I O .t 21. �-- F�- \ :I 1 �__ _ ''..,\31,50 ; 4 / 2-,� O I \ ! ----- _' .k;• '�Z/- i y0�/ O \ /\) i j I 19.00 `3, - - / t =` +_ -- -- <n 33. 0 a O O / ) I \ _ 8-- - !r 1 1 / --- RYF I �' y. �_ NMH; 17.0 _ - ° \•.. ° - _ eco f 'r �I - � C / --- - - i / J6 T - 1 __ lT,, ME L r :'r T-m--31.}6_'.8 'v :v u / I T _ J � r _ ' F� O I \ l.= 23.s2.=H� _ r 7 I \ \ _ �• _ - _ ,/ter, " , /' 1 ,. 0/® _ _ / l I �.,` h V ! 'h �'�- -i` -��` � ®� j •� l 1 /� -� (`� __-- __ - _ 2 ` \---- -- % FCS _ 1 �, I l �cd A - - i _- - - 1 'S - ~_ - d'' i - _ / 11 I ` - I ~ ;; / h , - , _ \ NEW MASONRY RETAINING --, `\. I - �. _ - -;- j ��I \ - - ---- -- i / / , „ WALL 0 7 & 8 -- -' - ) /� - _ --r - , \ \<_��•. ✓' -- _ ,I`•I / e t I r1 r '_ \_' - - l/ _ t .y .��' .y _ 'I O- _-____1.-- 'J- '- _ / - I -�Y,1 ;3 / / - I , �" L « _ i 0 y NSMH 0 - - a �'\ �r � - - _-- \i - f / - 1 \ I '� - 5 -_ -.- 27.00 __y,' ICO FRq o• - 2 9.0 _ t_ - _ I - - - % NW- - _1 I I - / - \ \ - �- ) - \- 1 �q ti1F ® ` T =/33.25 pi -- `\� �,., i / \ o r f / 3.03. \ I _ �.\ I GF ` - / _�- I ! \- ®� / T = 31.00 \ ��_ - I/ < 1 i t \� Q�:' I 21.84 W _ \ y, << �- ;, , - / f I = 17.00 \ _� -- FF ' \ I 20.82 N,S '� \� / �' _ _ %' ga1�_ G'-` ( / i \ _Y/_r- --i i _ -- / _ - \\___'-t ? (� 4Z 4,`' ;' t� \\ -- [<t y+ '1 / / <.y x ��32 v / -? - k / l \ r -- - - " _ i c 3/ I 'Q., / Q _ I'D- i / TRAP I -'.z.,z - -®",0 _ f--= ��'-__.'� 4 O - /''J . `t \ -- � '� _ ,l - - _ --.___ .� r; , �..-y _ 1 �W .I �t�� Off''\ � I , 'r t 'I \ - - `�'"'' �-31�� // -- ® l r' l 1 - `S� \ .�, / __ - _ '\% '` ��\ ! /- O M I , >i, I I \ �', o z ° M 3.02.0 , V _ . �I. 1 _- i _ _5.3 O 1 k - 0 \ 1„ ,, , 0) // �/ F l I ✓ I - -.\_-_ - /i'" f T 30.50, / O �G z � h ', __ " - + 25.50 _ - 1\ { I = -• ( \ \ '4 i-, - ', ! ..+ 1 - - _.-\__ _-- _-,'' °_+',,.-�'� 1 14.22;N.S / Q' i / 1 _ �' -��" �c.4 / I /' �-_ --_.._ ' I I II r \ r� \ \ ":,r i N: 4 d +� SCJ f.' :� / / , ` I I J t Y t I 19.73,W ,& \ _ / i I i ✓__-- Y 3'. y'' \_ <C J };" [ I' / _ �- _ - I ,"k+'-'.-a ^� fir y> -_ 0 _-_ i_ / X - \! t __ _-' ., \- I I ,, '1 -� - 1 �1 I I / / µ �- \ -_-_ / .ice'. / r:�, -- .+ - '`i"' _ f" i'� I '•' 1 I`- 1 ^`\.. - I 1 O , , --__ - I- I r% \ , � \ -') 1 \ -�, ,', sa \ _ ��_ '//l I / / `,i 'I / � - - I 1 _l, s, -^•�"�- ', / __-__ 1 - -- - 1 �'' _ , s, r 1 \ ' / �`\ `/ i/ i , - I S . I \ rn / Q -t _i/ -- / '- s . l I - ` / / , ` I GREEN I \ '• 1 -n.�\ O y< I �J,Q / _ .3 / 1. l ,} 'I' s \ 'I p�' \ - ,, N; - � NEW TR SH - --__ - a \ \ / 25 NCB 4.15.2 I_� / a� `� / / / \\ �F * NSMH 1:09.3 J _ T = 24.25 4i r / ' ' ;l r . \ I \ \\ T - '32.00\ \ v'> /r \. T ~ - -r• !f F : r PICK--U P., A R ,.,, /' _ '•L �, 1 i ' ,-, / ..0. I !` Q 1 I I - l I CPQ \ - = \ I :. 'F3.72'\ ,�.. / -1 / l , E A / I 20.35' f >I ,3 ® i a _ M i,- U cam`<v O ! `I �1 Y \ \\ \ �� /� Li i' 1 ` - is 1 � /l ,1;_ % / y 1 / ,: I i Iz �,Q O O " l ✓ \\ I ' »' \ I \ ( �/ ��VV "?/ -,c 1 cy Za<' / im 1 �� l' ! Z TEE \ - 1 \ u I Q __ I r 25.50 1 \ r / m ti0o O ' I 11 -. __ \ I " \ 1 i' i �, O / 1 \ • - f \ Q J O� - / <r, _ �, 24 OF\18"4 HD \ �r, -f / ,p ", ^ ��, ) / \ \ \ ! ' , p' '€�Y \ J")•r / 1 - ' IPE ® 1.00% ' - \ 1 !�\�_ i r. '� ,\ ,/� .hry , , %! ,, \ t 1 I ® O +r \ , I�� - t?- `+ 1\ \ \ \ \' r y - rr / V 1- ' N I U. r,,-, �_ \-_ / it ! _ _ / __ l / , 4C/ t 1 \ <' /' ' ^� CL / \ ,_ I � NCB 4.15.1 1 ,'�~.i ' ,%� / NCB 4.16.0 / i I � _ \,� -t , _ .I, T 24.25 �F~>.� ,j I T 29.20 �- / ', I - O'L - j� �L __ - --` - •z\- / •` \ , i\ _- 1 I I 20.11 r 18 H 1 , I 19.67 i \ - ;i 7 I i I --- O , / / -c_ 1 ' r - rO 1 _ t - - 0) I t I '\ =j- - _(_f -'_ / / , `'-''.=-ti, \ OAF p/ : 1 a t _ \ It, '� --_ ~� 32. 0 } , +_'28... Q \ CO * QJ ` C -orf _,', / l l \ \ . / '•.-:� I �>; �� 1, 33.46 / \\ - m1 = -- / 1 ~` : - _ - ' \ I (_.. - 4 ,iW I s I' /'! ,-OO O t.' \ \ r _-.�•" I l i' I l /S -ice•. , / 1 \ _ /C fir; .- I - -- _ / I '_ TORT i \ _ ( - \ \ i N H'3.01.0 V_ .1 - I - -/ I • - - -- CO Yt \' :NMH 4.15.0` �? - - ' , - / 1 TT 'Rq - i \ - --- �q ? - i qG F T = 29.0 i ,. l T - 31-00 > St > 1 \ _C 9a `, '.3• ./ `__ 13.75 1' " r', Q i' �1 1 J 1 I G�tit. 3 4' 6 / i \ \ \ I 19.55; I I^\ `' I /' j I Al Q o, '' �F v .\ r l ' I - _ _ / - f , ARE . . j -�._ Q__ .- '' o ; t , �, / / - _.�;' -_ - i l c j O r^ r .' 29 Q \ _ � I i l - N H 2. 8.0 i . l _" -_ ,%/''_;y,: 1-_ _ .a 7 / ?'S - ; Zt_--'_ I / / ,. _ _ I I ..:,�_ __._ - --- - t< - - - I _ - -- - I � _ _ i S)' - _ / -? I, T, 30.30 ;, . / i �� - >,. - -- i' 'I I '� _ ORy''y _ l I 19.81 - - - ! F r / - - - A - 1 c" f NSMH 2.07.2 K l - -c5 r ' - - I 6»WM F :'"sir' - - l � a" ®,, _>- - 1.-:' -- --,- I- ` t_, ;�' --�_ 6'� (n� - ; _ ., , l ,.r -'i'-�. - �� - 1� }' I _ l'/' v / `-1 D`, V _ r:� O• �_✓ �s ,� O•„ .-- _ - _'i� '-r`.- - _` '-I _, 7 28.40 .i E �r I ,' -- n I O•: $' �'4 I _ -- >` ( / - = l w-- '�- - `�'/ -- 2 40 ) 29 . I. / \, I C9. Q ^� j mak- -I, �.` Ir I O \_,. S!.3 !t- �/ - _1 \ \~ !, / Q V ^7 ,\ o: NOTE I I -�' / ;:I 4, t✓ / / 1 - \ v �I/i,/ \ I%"�� 1 1= �,. I! `p' ;1 1 , , '-v-• - '� ,` 1 -/;L 28.501 - - - l`' STO ` .r0- \\ '' ,'v% ,i ' -. 1� 1. ®.•, 4 ' /I SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ; , _ t •- #1:0 [` 1 ''[�: q f 1 1 THE DESIGN OF THE STORM I ` \ _ - % , �� O n - t/��._ /' +^ RI A-i m CV M Q SEWER THROUGH AN R 1 NMH 3.01.1 __ \ ' .; ��' < \ O r• _ OTj Rq �� 3 ,w _� 1 g I D/O r -- -- - ' r ,+_-- `-� I 1 '' _�Q _\_ _ /, / I qC Mac O� 4� i T_ i I_ L t l UNDER THE PROPOSEl7 1 ,' T = 31.00 , `-J". - r _� -�� I71-- T r 1 P o = ��- N,E NSMH 9.2 q BUILDINGS. / I = 17.00 y_ ,'__� 9O Taj` ti NSMH-2.0 .1- -_- / 6 0: )"', \ i' . T, 29.60 r'. 1; 1 I :A _+' y � - ,� .J \ s _T = 29:75. -/ - F _ = 29. 0 " ki `t' I I i'\ \,fit 't ' - <' I = 21.75 4� �., \ - I °.. , + li I / ! ` sl_ , `r - I -_ <``3O 'r, __ , z'° / 28 1 H _ _ 1 I. 16.1 g 1 \+ - - 1 _1 r - F r 0 a• l ' I 1 r 'I ,, II f / t I I \ ---_ - \� (C _,/, '/, - _ y,' A, - - ' , <�y_> / \{ /` ,a�� , � - 1 / -L; / - c I _ u� NCB 4.14.1 m Q„ +- i - , r / I I- 1 / s _ _ , . 49 r T 27.76 / _ Je, r l , I , .. `"`4 \. , - I .= I �_ 1 23.41 E ° / \t \ J /` 4, / �''' �> \' - - - r NCB 12:2 0 -i ! I / 1 , " I. , -- --`� ,� �. i 1 = 19.89 N S \ / o _ _ T / <v ) / TEE ,�.�-. _ N¢0 07.8 I I '- --,--_---- - _ _ __ ti,: , ,p/-., , .;, T 1:9' I l _ - 1 / _ '` 1 / I 1.125 Sg`''•.b." "` / ,' i/ , l l o _ onni'„ /_ o r - --- _ : - I NMH 4�a o / a _ I ��>"/ O - - ® ® I/ ,1B.a0 r - - '- �`> - _ - s t -- - - 8'j` p ' Z 04 I 1 T 27.73 j o 1 �Q M Z 1- t og / py ,~ � r 0 ` -- - .,r I I 18.93 J 6`78• ;, / p�I n� - - 1 / / HOPE �}},0 j -' \ I t l/ I '».,, p \_ C /, // ;/ !. r \� f h,- of , I _ r_. f a ' / - I �, - `f �1 . l 1 i l �' ,, , ti Jet. . Frc o - -- �, NCB 4: 2 ' / f / I I W /\ / O / // .; i _ ,-_ I o STOR. _ i J ��,�� 7 NCB 4.13.0 tiG \ `\ �- 23:75 ;/ _ , Y/ - :, / 7 , I I <. 23.60 , / � I o CO f � ,' / s OF' y/ C® T 27.11 _ \\' / r 1' e\ 'Y`' - + + ns :/ ',\:" `� 1', I / { _ `I �r I / ( / / L �gGc9MF / t - __ "\- 'i�- / JB�. / -�40� I 18.69 /' O\ \ / / 'I .. I ``'/ --% �f ?.O.' / `c,,'t- , ,\ r/ ,` I / i r _-29 '%,ST '` /' +-'- ' ®2�• -+V•' \\�f I i -- W f' ,/ �ts I j r I d0 _ CO/�yF �� +z6.8r•o - -- - % Y U.1 r I' ;�: \ c,,, 1 - -= I , 1 -- - _ '� F_ f N 12.1 Frc �t; t///'1� A/ ( \1 g = I - - - -1 -- - r b lLl1 / -- - -- =e 1, �G � O V J 0 \\ a 1 g= 11 - I, FF v / I / T = 25.2 I Q 1 .O / `-.< ,Y ro: u - - - -1, I 21-01 3 w C� , / ', / I 0 ® ',\ ;• ,' ! ,1 l 111 i` 3 --- ,_ ,/ r, - _/ / -_-'i' \' 1 r •d0 I. --� - _ - =4 r '�' ^r ^ _ __ 1 I , '.o 1[•. 't! je I I 1 I - - _ j ; s,0 O O I O / / t' n, / I , a P II, I; I 1 ,' I = 17.16 -- / /- - r\`; _ 1 /,.rr.r-/ �7 9 0� V // 1 r / Y/R T 1 }r )' Y ``! `t ' / -__-- •.,.'_\ _- / I I MH 4. 2.0 - '"' �c,�' I j �j &.' l -I / 1 I / - � ' -- - l ORY i T 26.8 r y`IY il - /', oK = v ---.- ---- - l J - I L 11 o I 18.ss NSMH 2. .0 / 21.50 " �/ i '�. - f', =- ` ,' _-- - - ---- _ _ I �1 ACF d/F , r 2s.o / - L /59'"OF'8 N, j i It � -� G� - ' - -- I F (J / r<11 , i I = 21.13 W '' SMF 1.Ok3V" .a "�,p A 1' ___ -_ -- - /- t r A_ / r I = 18. N.S-c` I �- = 20.1 O `'/ / I i, = I -- ' ` I E'4a 4 ,r- I - / _ 15.401 I / I' Vi. I l ; \ '-,• 0 NMH 2.06.2 / - JP800 4? `�,_ 1 t / J/ I / , ' ,� � �` T 3,.50 -- / / NEW FIRE LANE - ; 2 `` \ ; / / 4i ' / o jl» ,;aI I I 19.00 / I / 1 / / �- �o ' a•a / a_ t_. l.,I,`, / / .,x20' STABILIZED SOIL SASE `, _ / /_ °� / I � \ 1 , NCB /2. 6.1 LOOT. ' \ r / - -- - / - I / N o T 1 / O3 T - 9.25 " ; :'2, r f ,' - /-�\ ; �/ _ ___ y� 2�c�'^ o I i I .O I /}5.25 - / ! r SMH 1.09\ I \ / i / \- -- '' o by // ti V J O' tiyy Q / ! ,- I 1 /. /' i j 11 28.00 ! \' 1 1 / �> / 1 / / I C tr p� ' O ,, I O / \ � z I /_.` .', I 15.64 ! \` I 1 % 3 I / . \ \ , -- _ , 1 / / ' -B 4.11.0 " O // /,4,: �. v 1 +: /,, -- - i ! - / T P I T = 25.75 v \ 1 t. / /_. is ' I 1 t / I - - 1 I /61-18. , I = 18.10 - r �, %` \ I y a -- - Il / ! NCB! 2.0610 \\ I '\ / « 8.5� I - 1 f l 1 7.0p-r _'r (c \\ I / \ ' a = 1999 N S \\ / / / ' d I \\ ' f/ \\ 2fi OOC s °. Y i/ \\ ` �I ) 0 I �' r, I � I * 1$.49 W;E 1 \`----�/ i // r / I, \\ NCB 4.11.1 ' \ / O ( // - / o ; 1. \ ST - \ \ T 25.75 ! \ r I f Zq 1 i , / / / 1 - -_ - - , ORy -` ' ' \ I - 18.26 -- / \ % O I / ' /, r ry//, I I ! / " _ Q�� I \ COTTgCRgF - / I - 11 ,/' j / i l / f- ! `'I - t \ \ ' ` - , I// / /' I -- ,Z7(�, 't I ' 'S F - _ - t ' 11 _ ,! ( / ,.,� 1 €� ,�^ " -'` '_� / _ r moo!^ c� X28 1 4, 1 / ri1 / i O I / \ ^t / / I / W ,° ,'370 O '3 \ / \ \ \ 1 _ I 2 / 1 /' V v 21.30. I / + 1 / ,_ ' I 1 4 0' ,. �. v -_ \\ / - I NSMH 1 108.0 / \ TOR l - r' I\ p ETC 1 I \ o:', . / T = 21.50 t1 \ _- - ---__ // / , ,i NSMH 2.06.1 /' � I (OTT F;q - i/ a \ / f'- 1 1 50 ' T 24.50 qC� MF i / l \ \ I. _ �_.,, / _ , I 20.50 I 1F 091 6 ,`<' / ''- >' l N / >- l J ( 28/ ,dry' \ / H 2.05.0 / !` Q G \ OO / - \\ j' r 21 0 -- s ,\ r' \\ l l _ } ��`ca�" 00 ; ' \ I f - - •- - l - / I = 1 .58 ,' / / - r- rY , l�,-Q�.J \24.75 \ \\ + ' / / `30 1 �'2 ' w { \ 'i..,. - / 27.50.. F. / ' fi� p�0 I S r I I _, / / 1 f - + O ry r / \ - / /; v, 1 _ 6,,� i NCB I `� -) // � / j - / o I 1 - ' / 7 23.25 3 I / V ! - I /, / �c 1 \\\ -' . V,/ 1Frc j i I - 19.25 1 - - -- - -' / a i qr, 1 � "----z - --- /' / 27. ; 1 F�GYIC' \ ! �\, 'Ie 31 0 / j• ` _ . -.I // 0 I NEW P / '' 11 N � ' X28- J o j,1 4 HAL ING AREAr .� �' ';/ • °- ., /, .� -/ (G T DINING & CIL Y PARKING_-52 CAIS ,: It I w 1Jo c.� ,; ,Q i' - / / , - ' I , I l I OF i, 33y O_`: / ;� _ NEW PEDESTRIAN PATH ' ' ; NCB 4.io.= tioAfA•`` - - , �� - _ 1 / I, T 23.25 ' AF 26.70 g W ® /. t J�T,O,RY ` / 01 - - / 2. '"�` 47 - - _ I I /D \ / I / --- -- � 2?9 l -/ I ' / / / �tlTTq�i�'�� _ \\\- /y t �/' t. ry�/,l�-1 8�}QA% I '' C� --- t. / _ ` , II � /, -1 _ , , I /•fes S� ` '--. � ` /�- _ �j� } 'f � Q 1 __ / ------- `i 0 _ _ i PFC- -- - -- f / B 4.10. . o - - / i �- ® � I 1 -2100 { f NMH_4.10. / ''T6. = 26.30 Q p� 0)j / /, - 16.7 �\/ `• \I 1 } T = 26.30 I .. r. tiI O // O, / I r _, / \ = S ORy I = 16.79 o NSM 2.06.' `J --- - ^ 4 _ / LL • 26.2 ' I \\ -gCR9/{/� o T 26.40 c� _ / a- ;.11. _ \\ S e 1, I I. }7.46 1 -- J$ - -i'- - /-- V ® _ I 6 � \\ , F�\ i r` a 4/ / i \\ --- `� 01 Qom. _ - - l \ f' ti / . .--. -- R-,' 4, - - - - ----- . ,�, a I, _ i I - - 1 -- - - --- - -- 5 - - - - - ` - V r✓, " /!- -- - LIFE CARE COMMUNITY t " - - - _ - _ - - t -j �V -- I --- _ --- T '�/ _ _ ,- - - - / - -- - - -- -- - - 1 - - �~ N PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD _ - - __ \ \\ - o-Q_ 4- i - \ ��\ y NMH�:6T6 o NCB 4.0 � tz � -� / - I \1\. �� ! I = ?6.09 46`18�-J.00,, I 19.75 - - �� ^ / . - - �� S70 A RAME �/ _1r ,1v�a - / At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD u - �.s�°o� c51 - -_; - --_-- // 24.00 - / Suffolk County, New York - �0 ; /- . _ r CB 4.09.1- � _ / / - _ _ 200 FF EL=28.00 / STOR ( !- r / r 23.75 - - % I COTY�R - / � I - 19.59 // 0-- / - _ - - - -__ 4F �� T,gC�g4/e - -\`,_- , /' "� / Suff. Co. Tax Map. 1000 35 I 1 I 25 M0) / District Section Block Lot - _ „ -_ N 2. 4.0 - - - - - - - _ I FF \ T 22.80 - _`__ - --_" ,: --- - - _ - Z 12 / - _ Q /' - _-- - OO / ' _J = lost - -- - -- _ -- _ _ _ / - - 18.5 ,- - -- - - - - ---- \l ° �® h P - _ - - - _ _ ---------- - _ '/ - ° 7 S _aW c / SITE PLA N - -_ - _ -- - ; , • �, __ -- - -- _ - - - /- - NSMH_2 TO ' - a / _ _ � --.. - - - 05.1 CO yFR QW ,'G o I // Q� _ T - 22.75_- • "' qui_ I. T o 4 1-c O �� 9 I_ - 18.70. S� Q<� ° �� O N / k i A._ . s �� // _ \ _ ;_ 2S o QI �, / I ,� - NES �� _ - _, w -__ _- _ - ° ' s'I- 1- `� , __ - /-_\/ . -_ �. p / a �� + 1p �� _ / lag OF P ------''/ - /� /\\\ d '90 . -_- 25.75 a»0 vc ® _ NCd 4.07.2' _ � i - -- _ / / \ '�C 4 �. , + }6�° T = 22.25 I' - / / \ _ s ,-+�. - /��NSMH 2.05.2 --- ..1 = 16.15 ,, r o `\ <,- 4j _ -- - --- - -- - - - - --- / T = 25.40 3 - _ / / \ r-'0 �/\ / I 21.10 \ cc V / \2S <j ' \/ T - - _ - _ i -a. - NCB 4.07.1 �'��'n , \\ - W - /> l 45aa��,`:''T` > -_ T = 22.25 8' \- / / t"" lv/ J t1- / J��' \ n - SEE SHEET No. 3 OF 13 N- 45 "�w�- ,`�' S C wp 0� ' � SEP. 6, 2000 * NOV. 24, 1998 AUG. 24, 1998 I- MAY 19, 1998 SEPT. 17, 1997 _ DATE : SEPT. 4, 1997 {� SCALE :1" = 40' 4:4 6148`3 �� , JOB NO. :97-290 _ ,; Ml��P SHEET NO. :5 OF 13 O ----- ------------- ---- - _- - - -- ----------------------------- - -- --- --- - --------------- ---- -------- --- - --------------- 970290 p 01 OF 13 - ---------------------------------- - ---------- ----------- ------------- --------- ------ - - - ------ - --------- -- ----------- - ----- -- - --- ---------- ------------- - ---- -- ------------______-- -- -- ------ - ----------------------_-- _ ------ --- -- - -- ----_- ----------------------- -- s 1 ____ I . I � � __ � I - - I 11- - . I . I I __ 11 I � . I I I I I I I - � 11 I � I I I I � I I - I I I - � � I - - I - - . I � I I I I *1 0 � I - m I � I I I I . I I � I I L � �� I � 0 mlh� I ung ung, an urveyors ,-,,;,�� I . - 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 0 9 21 14Vyn# � ; 6 12 co �"" �I � 516-727-2303 W . I nq � ,"`�' ll . i z I-1_� I 40unig I 5gw. I Alden W. Young, P.E & L.S. (1908-f994) i 1 cc,I 1. � I Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor ,--7,--,- :, 1_� Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer ( 111anoing -) I Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor 1< �, . -1 John Schnurr, Land Surveyor ( iEmffi.,.iEqD SEE SHEET No. 7 OF 13 � IV, I D _ ) ", I , , -- I , , I -1 = " f "' i.., 1, /, . I. , � 111/� , , I 1. , // , li/ I � , ) )'',\_� _ - I / , / " \ \�� ,-; � I i \ - _\ I I _ , 4� '1/ / I , " t. 1 1 ll t � I�/ //// I ,�, , �" -:7 Z�_ I / \\ � --, � , ,-, � - � , "�I, � 4� / - --_ I I I"I I 1, I �� I � �-�Ij 'af -4-< ",-i, i � ,�, � � � �I /i, I':� ilia ( � ` , , /I" , � , -1- i " � 1, , -- \ Ilk -- 4�_t___ I I _11" I - 2L 1 _; I __ "' � , ;I, " \\ -.-- , .- , ,, �� (A � , �,I /I , / / I !- i i , il'i �"I /1 ,-- -1 11 -� -;" 41 -11 ,, i CY) cc,�0 , " _"- , / / -- , �1 1 , I -, ,� � ,.�,\ , �', - - - -- , , ) �, � 1,�,7 , "" 1, - �< -_- - - \ , - / CA i � � to I " , - - , I �11 - - , - -- )� I\ �- _____ ,� ,_ I , , / : � ! 1,�I, , . 1 I---_-� I-_ �_-_�L_i'�� I,- _<_- � -- - , " -- ,C::i-_ , '� - -- ____ - � I -, I ,i /' �,/".�, �, j I " - , - - -�, - 1, 1� -- . - \ ,-1 - - 1 lj� I / , 1��',� 1-�- - - - ', 11 ,��,� _P� I �: i �:,� - -- 1�� ,�, ,��, - - _- - I __ / 1, il 6 ,_ ,::7---- ___ --- \ -"-- " 1, \ - I ,- , r� - - - 0 -, , !3 113 � , - 110 _� , -� - , _�__,`L // 1, A/I I \ I / , ,�, , , I, I ,� _,-�� " , \ ----- 'i 1)" __ 7 '_ I 1, / � _ ,--.--f ,�_ -1, ,I ! ___ __-,-- - I I I I .1 _; , � i ,� , ? , , .- r4.-_," I - 1- - , 1 \ :1 �t ,- i , , " , � , , - � ��ee� ___ I / 4o I = Q.." -- __ ) _�' I -1 9, , , , � � � ,I � , / \ - , , _ , /� 2 "I '11 -_-- \ � I , -1 I/I , - . I,I 'I" " I I ,\ N \ � 1, l \ I " .- .� --- -- " / �� __�� -z", Q / / . , ";i �a"I" ;, � \ �tl - I �� - � \ � \,C-- 1, ---- --�, , / ,�� / 2 *1" � -, � -� NEW SILT' F ENCE Sq 1-110 EMILES " J, 1 , :! " ! \ , (� /\, 11 ; (I I ". / " X�, \ \ � 1� � 1,� _"- -- �_, �', \.\ f / ',, /1, , - .5 I /1� 5 &� ,�l;tiAf ", ! * / I / ''I li�". N l�', � /, I __ �, , \,/ I A � , __ _�_ (_;- , , __ \ \ � / ja- � I I / i, � � "',t;0,;t�,_i as% _ � 1 ,I i , " , i, ./, / / - i , �� \ - '-, 1�, __ __-- -___ I ) , 1 -, . - IE i -_ _____ - A& - - , I 1 ,kls, m; ,_ / -0 1�,,_-,w-� �,�, ;ro�� ---- -ir, I I /' / ,',"/, ..I� � I I 1 , I , I I-__ I/"f, ,, ") i,'. i ,�,�,� I \ I ' Y "--L-' " f - " - "� - _ � 11 219 16, - ,,,, - � TO VE SET IN PLACE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION I ..."', // , f � I / / /It I-, , 1 // 'V, __ ,��,,O, \ ",,.,, , __ , �, , -- \ ,J )&MH 109. 1 . � ��o P 1 1 i� �""W" I 01. 1� - -__-, : I = 27.25 n ; "', I , , -/, ",, \ - A - �- - �-, ---I I = ni� , , ,i'� , sub, - -_ 0 1, i ACTIVITY I :", i I. J* , T 11 ,�,�I "" - _ " 'I' i I ,1 \ I if j, "-� --.-/-- - , � ; ��, . 0"�! x 27 3 1 � � '' 7� 0 if 1 01, � I/ " ./ / ,��', , I,/ - , , It I WIN' - - - - i_,, , I " I W , - / _ / -1 i �t , \ �I � - --1,"�, 1, 1 � I If / " I �_-, ,1� / , � - 1�-:- " I 1 , �, //, I/ .I 1 4 1 "i, __ I-v __ 1, k\ ��_ �, ,_ 11 a! C, , � -, I / ;. f � I 11 I I/ // /I/../ I , 1 4 vy" ! ,, _,�I �"�, �, I " I - � -_ I , � ��,� - I 114 -1, , '4, ,,,,, - " 11 . I I / -_-,�5 --- - ---- --------_---- I //� , " / , `(��/ '_ _,��",\ , . 4?1 .1 I NO 3 ,� I - - I / f , 0, I - --n m! , , 1 'Ab I - I - ", / . � / I I � / - � '' If", � - � , �v\ � -, �, I / / I I I I " ,�i�o_ -- k I I ___ -- 39��,\ , __ � -1 " _L.L / i 1 - , I I lk�, -_ I 11 -" I . � I I , . I , �i� __-, "-�$� IQ I 11 �A,,___' n--0, I I- I , , ) :)p",\t i \/ __ 25-1 �� I I 11 : AN- �'. / / , / '\ �, __ - i.: ; � �, -,-- , / I §//// - / , I - "�� / 'f I ji l .1 ��9_ 1 , I \ � - .I- , , _� � T = �j �" T = 29.75 �� I �, , -, � ,,, 1 -�, 11 0/,� - -,0 z \__ , / . , , I ,� ;1 / � I = on! � , I = 21.11 1 , , ,il- - - . --1 Y l j --- 11 -.7 , / - � I - , 1� . " � ,,, (O � � I / , � �, - I�, i 7� , � /) ___ � I" - /1 0 1 __ - " � ;� ,,�.` � --------- I'll i,� )1,c-� ,,-,_�' -) I � - " _1 __ / � - - -- I , -- ,- ,/ '� ,I \ I �, 1 � "I , \ .. : / /, 1 11 . I j// I - � 0 / �� -_ - �� , I, / / -_ 7" , I � I !11� - ! - - I /I �, I . - _____ -1 ? ; ,,-,�7 " / I __--__ , e�, - , � \ ,_ I, � , __ \ F I 1"', J ll -1 _/ -� , _) f � I, - . - --- ,� / \ I .1 �� : � - , f I'D I - --��'.. I � '_�4 1, -,�7_ - - \ I . 1 - , t, ---_ t . I ").1 - - , I -- / �I , - ;, , , / � -_ -- ,/ , " -: -7--17- 1 ,�. , _��-� ,�",",-, , , 1 11 11 / 1 1 'If I , � ------ -- , , , ", "/ / - oil, I '! \\ // / // 1" " 0 � i? "I 1 � , / , / , . " -, \ �, , I / , I / / .. � X--- ��,,' , . '� ,- "'i I lltit_�__ � ,��_- , _�' NSM --_ ___1 ;7 i - I \N\ 1� / ,/�/A/, is __ �<, __�_i ,I ///i'l,I.,.-"/*, /, I,, //� . - i r/ -- =-�-- - , 1.�,'. , , //\,I ,',,,---- � ,C_,_�, � � ,�, � �, _,Z, \ I I no I �� , I I . / - I - '7 \�\ , - - , 'It, , ,--:>�_�I 'e", - - ,�",,,/ , 1, _<\ , _i� I NS ) i / r17 </) ,e I 1-- n\\ z , . , . di/x - , I / -,=------ % � 7 op, - �', /_ � I I " \ / / . �, - �� ,_ -1 "(I � - - - >I'-- - ?' ' -_ 75 " T = 29.90 T =� - -- /,I 1, ,\.\\ , -` �, ;��',_ -_-- ____ . I . \ � " - __- -_ �� ,_ __Ill� 11 I -�,t�<\---_ - - l7 � I I / v I = 22.48 1 � 302 1 In --- I -- , ,�� - i� � y/ .1 ., 1 1 " " I A , - �_ - , - " ,-�, , -&� - I , , _\�L_ ��', A Win � , ____ - 1,i�\ - 1 i IL � 0, A' ' 1 - , , - , " " / /I 1. , - \,� - - , ,I - ,---____�_� I �X I,r _X�l,- , - `� 1 03 �" j� �, J I � , 11 __ , '� 7 X � __ � - - 11,1 1'�_� I / � - -__ ." , � / / " ,� NQ .�N�f �, , - -- � " �, , - __(0 , , i - - - ____ - , / ----- -, )l 28 2 - , ,�, , I ) I I , . !"! -- � �_ , i I / I I , I I, _� T = 21t75 � '� , � , , 1, , I I, , " 0 C-_ I �, I � � __�__ - -_ - � ,//;,/,_,� I � .10,� , , , // , � , � I I \ / \ / ( ,1/, I \\ .-7 fi� , ,,�\ I , �'' , ," /',,, I ., " 1/1 , /'� ,, I\ \ " I --- - C, "J,4, /I �, " \ , ;, , - 1. , .. I/ "i , I / 11 I - ,_ C�� I ,, , � � /_ / \ '_ I - -_ . , �1 _/ -, �_ C -- � \ � N\ � ,, " , . --- __�� '. I , - , � , � 11 - ,� -, �\\ ."p , / �, V , / i / I / I ,,_ =C18�57 -----)�7 - � " ,, , , , ,a, � \ \ � ;�,_��_ __ - - � " , 6 r",-:9 I � \�/ , , / ___) __l C ,_- "� " ,� , \ �", ; �,��,, ,:-1 ! N \ Y-If I -- -- , ./� -) , , - - , � 1�I \ � �,,�� ,� 41 , , , / 4` -, � � F � , \ I e�k T' _�_ I -t�-___�_, \\ � i W', -- / /"', - - -'' - -1 I il ,,�, I �,,-, i / �, I-.� I " .,�-__,--, - / I � / " � "�\�I, �, 11 -- � I, \, \ " ck- �__1 -1 �, - 1> V! -_ I I " IV�, / 1 -11� / 't, 1 1:0 1 I un, / � � , , �, I" , , .!i../I.-/ / 11 ��_ �, __ " - ___ x in- , - a 1 004 4. , in , 2 Mop i - ,/ I - ' ; / - - , ,,,,��, , " ( . , , , ,,,, _�,� , ,,,, I � .( -*l, 1&6 ; / , ": , i"r , I , , , � , , � � i � 11 , � � � � � 1;; �� ,. ; / .�,_�, , , � , "" � __ .1 �� 1�, 1;;� ! //b,"", / , I� ", J -l_� , i , , , 1-1 I - . I� - .! ,/ � 1� 1, t" I I _��_ i- � I i7 \/, '�', /'� , 1 1 -- I \ I I __ . I I - � , " �_ _� _, // 7 : 3 6 " .� ." I I I A� 11 ,11 ,1, i� 1\, - .1 'I- - , - ---7 - _,",�,,, I - -'r � 1 i. .- RX I SAE � I �_,_� ,�� -- __.W_W17 --- - ,�� , --.---,i /, NSMHi 'LQ2Ai /I f, e � " /I/ .. I � , I - __-,,-, - \ 1, 'IV ,_ T, I �I' �i ,I � �� 1�, I'\,- 1�, - __ ------- , .. , I C - 1-, -1. 1\ , 1 2�?., ,-I- I I _7- - _ _N�, /M/TE ,I' �1 I 0 - ,,;�, - ---;.- ! I 00, ! , 1. , I I 1 5 ,/I _ � , - I , I i �i � " i -45.- k__ ., ,. '4.I, \ � 11 �i - .. - �a I "�� CH ! I 1 -1 I It - I � - - I � � _____- 0111AIT1 -____ ,�� -0-t � � - ------- -- , I / " 7 � 'i � , � " ,�, � ,., ,;", - ------:- -, 0�� , , � 1 �-. r'NTECTUTRHAEL STLOARM' FOR � , , , ,_�` -A , /", ,( - , _1 '� / � , , - _,;;. � . /o ,, - -,, � �� , _1�--,,- � ; _� _ I-,`.i�__ __ . / � 114 � ,_ i i __1 � I I � I I �. ,� !_,� �.. ,� / Z01 , , -,,-,;-, , -- 1 . , , , I , - - -- __,----. " 44 5 / - I -�-� I�11 ;� \,", ,� -_--� _� - _;,�_ .�,,,, K I , , , � __ - � I � , i _�_�_�, -1 , ,� ,� , � -�� -'��_,e.�_� i, I , � - - --- , S, ,_ - -,-,-,,-,,,,- - -1- I ii I / , ( I �� I __ - T : 11j8:0---- / I i � "I -___�_- �_ '� I - ___��_ ,��, I �0�, l ;1 , - -- _ --- ," t,(12��! �I-i , � ,��Ik ,,z,_ __ - -" '0� , I I. , OF � , \�� 7�> r 077 0 7n,,,, -, ,, l, /?, \ � , �_ - -t, � ; . ,�� .�- - -,-- .. - _V\ "i /// THE DE I 0 i ) ] 4) / . I, , ' - i / CA � -_ . � I - .,� � - , - / 11 I F� , � I`-_ � "I , . , � 'T ,� - � �11 " "� �� FAIRWAY� \ . I 1--, --��c ��___ - I ___ __ ; SEWER THROUGH ANDdOR i : I / il 'mi-, , ./ : '! � - - -- - ,/ " � UNDER THE PROPOSE , � / . / / I' / �, * - ..-.- - -�-- ---- - ..W�--1 X , ;', , /�/ 11 I , . , / , I/ I I - , I - ,� , � - , ,� , I ) 1, ,' - I - __ , .. - --7�__ - - . - � z / � ,, , I i �_ - � ,)/S - - � , ,;-, , � ___ I , , .;. . �_ , - - � I " .__. - : - /� , � - ----, "� __I - - I - -1" 303 - `:�'I, I,I k - � , ,� �.... .. -- _-_��_,L - ,/", I BUILDINGS. I I �:"� / �; I�. 11 / / -- -�', �_11-- Y�__N�c� " 11: ,( _ - I - , _�,�� _. , �2 % , \ ... - - 1 � , � - , - � .. ,� /�,/ ,� ,q - -�----'-,-", -_ 't _-, -__- - -- __ , � , / " / 1-1- �,,,, - -I , , I 1� � - ,I ,� , _7 - , � _-, _�_'_ �, -_ \ , mi� � - I - � - � , - i 11 ____ - . /, / , I � �� / , , , " � k l, � - _____ ___� __ I I , I --1 I ) �_ , , __ � I -- -- , . - '7, _Y � , , I, �__ _ __ 'le/ // / � , �; ," `�_ �.of _', ", . ' 4'<\ 1, I I\ ! --� if ': , � \ % --, - - I / � ""t I I , - " I ---,------ ___ i I - t / , � �I _ _------- :_-��-_:� A 5 - ___- --I-t�� I � _"� � , , i �_',� I _'� ,� �__ -��q. , , - / I 11111�� I ,-:'111 I , __ - I I t, ,� � r - " - , (_ \ -, , - I , , r, - ' � - ` \ 17 �� "I , - - - _ - I I I , Ir �,� , _> " ')11, t��_N_ Y-VAi A� \ �41 � /� :t 1 � � � __ / , - _ , � _ - - ;",-.r , I � , -__1 __- __ ------------------- � - - , I I � ,� �_� I , I - -I,- , - ___4 ___:�__ 1�,,,�V I \ __- �, I � �Z - .50 - -11 - __-__- /� I I I � I / I ,f ,� I� �, I " I �_, , , A J I ', -----:i-_ _11_�_ �, - / ,"t(�, Q) I 1 � � ��1, ,,-,-,--- - ____ - --__ - - -____ ,___----_:.- I 11 I ;�' , , , I " � i :! I, / I -!-. I I � I �G -1-- -_:--_ -_ ,,, � ,,,, -_ -- - _,�,'77 40' // 1 1 -, \ i __ - .- - - __ -__ - ,, \ "-, I z ! /7 ""I I \1 I" I ()O I S ZZ -1;��,� �11_ , -_ -- C � - - - �I I \ I i - -0 i , __ - - - /" I � -_ " i � - - I ,I - 1 1, - " __�, I 1, I , ,, - � �OR y - --:4A - I,,,I_ -- 1 'I , I I __ __ - - - '00,�/ X 1� , I , .,--: --- " -_ , , - I �' _�\, -- .- ____ (107��* 1 ) �,_,`,�__--N MH / - --__- �.11' ��&C, / / :: it W , \ - ____ - - I / I �' I - - - 11 � �.J __ I a - I 1.�_,', �--- I - - - I \ , �� f - , � -- �;� b \ I , ____1 __ - - 315 � _ , - ---- - - :�,�_, - I., 11 ________�___ ,__ I �"'t - / I . , ,� I ___ -_ _7 , , __ - , � 4� : i � 1, - .-_T �-* ---------::__ ,__� , i "I ,i,�,:�l�10� I r 1_7�___ , , 11 - - - ;�� ,�, '!�--- - 1,__ .1 A- � _� - 1.:::.j - �_ � 1� --- __ � , - , � � -� t ., - , � �� -, - ) � I- � " -- , I �i ,*-_ - � I I , - -- _T_�� -7- - � , I -, \ - - _ � " 09 I � " , - -, _� -_ ,,� / -� 1 "" co!o � � I " - - - I . I I _( - � � �, , `�--� - \ - - -, , I'� 1_� "" - --t", I/ \, - - / i ( , 1-- -- -- __-1� ---- -- zz:��_, , / i, o _____ --A-,f A - -- ____-__ �_ � - I - 22 " - -_ , / PIC- �z I ---- .1, 0 i � --, I - - _:.:---- - ___:_------ :___ - � `� I 11 _�� I I �, �I � _ / ___�14_____7 ,--- 1, , - ; ,-/--I I r - ---_7__�, 1 1 , ?(_ ,-- - 5: I----- I - \ _7 __- -- � / (----- `� I V \ ____�___ _� _ -- / , - ,��, , __ ,r 11 \ - - 1 3�0 � � - I ;1 , I ----� I-, - // I // Q � I , - __ - '_�_ C___ -'I- I - I , i I __ __ -7- 1,� " / I I Al�IN -_ \ , - i .1 \ , - , 1 ,9 - �_____ '_ , I - I ,� / - "0- 1�1'1') ' , - ____ -----, 15t� , / / � �, - - - '� - , "I ,_-.__, - - . I , - 7.-, , , -- \ ______ /��I I / _� ; - --�_4_ NEW &ASONRYAET - 0 "I - - � ____ - -) i �1 '_ , - - - , / - 1 _��' d � , -1 / n�_ ; \ I - I _1_Z_ � � �, / ) �, ,1 / / /,_� - - - 1-- 7- __--- � \,, .___�f r " 1 % I �L - -- I�11 - ______� ____- wr__ , I X - i ___- __ ,, / � / f �,� _1 -_ - \ -- -_____� - - ------- I __ % � -, � � i -I--_ -� " - I " // , 1� I � � - ,WALL NQ 8 1 _1% - , �_�� % - �,_� S�0,�', , 1 6 � - ;1/ . - , _�,_ � - 0 � � 1 7?5 A 1- I I I - 1. - - rr--- -, __ , � I .i.� �� ,� ' * 27.00 � ,, I Coj� /'�? I � ___ - , �i-f; __ Wo i if , , / - I ; , V / - - � `_____ _____�4� , - ,; - -�� -, X ,,1-�- I I I 1, - I . 1, ,q I ,/ _ --- , , . I , , ) __ , ,,, , I � -- 1i 71, _' I\ � � � I � I - I ---- 1 �� n , I , __ ___ I I ,,, - Ife a T ;/ifif W ,� -:� --- -, ,!,�,�� ,� I- , / \ , 0- -�-, '. "/ / 1 1 , T � , � - , , I " '_�, . / I - I \"I I ,�l� I - _�__ - , , 1, /I � , � i / -,� : -1__ I .1 f , , � t 1� / � - � j, - I , , I I - , / � , I , � -_ - I - I - , -1- �� \ , " - �__ ! I � I- / - ,_ " / 0 ---I__ __ ________-\ , ," I - 20.82 :4 , ; / ,---- - - - / f1WH -3.0a.-I , 1, __ f , � m- � - I , ;; � � � __, L- I , � \ I � V,!�� " - . � . - , � I , - ,, ----------- - - / T : 31 0 1, I � I 7�7, ____-_--- I I I I - 1, / ,� 'C�"2 , ,,� 11 it, __� , , I� 1 I;"", I V __,� ,-,- " / I f \ - I , � j ____�_ � , 1 , (?'8 -A 4 -� ,,--,-_,��' t - -- - t � " I "_ :1 : ", � it N __ iu � I/ N I 1TOO _, 1 1/ I 1 1 1 "I -_ � ;� ,, , lQ7" � N,S - , I , - � 1, - - 1,� I \ � ,fr , , � I , _.v , � ----- I - - 1, 1_1�t;', , --,2 ___/,_�"__ �, I / I � \ I 1 J - .__- - - -_ 1) , '' � - I � I _;�, - ,/ �:�,� 11, , , T�RAP " - � 1 � 2" , I" 1 r , �,t, I - , , /� ,-- _4� - __ � .. I I _______--� , , -"� 4- I , 7 / I/ �� -�, e��_ -i � , --_ f , -11 --- r ,, ---- - - " _� -t I I I , ,_ :T I � / , , , , I EAT-t -11 , __f I", - -_ 1, !Q2 \ � - - // , :,�','�� " -1, �-!�, (, ,3�,J8 1\ �_, ,- ,� " 0 1 ! mjj�� \ - I - - / - � . , \ e , � I I 1, "I (� ,� , ""," __ / w - - __ __ . .- \ 11 - � , - \ . 1, - ,�7& (& , I _� i I I �� I 74.i� , � 11 i - � \ � __- - / 1. � , I� " .� "I .6 1 z 1 1 1 \ - , " "'t _--�, - ___?,9� , � � - , I t, t- - / / _--/-�- � . - , , / e X 1 , I !, - '_� ____ I ,Z�----- , :�::� � �- I� ,III' , , � � % , 1 I ___ --@ , 11 _� - � - I - , \ I , I - I 1�_ , - \ ,_ ,� __� ,_,fl ar 6 _,", / - V 4,t' I I 1, \ � � -:?I- � - - -_ - - - 1� ,,r'�, I\; , , .m �-11 "I ,_��A7�U) ,,,,, ; 11� I , � I - I,;_,_�11 �� I—- i �--� -W-�q - � � I _-, - , I /I , -- - - --- �! ` ; \� 1�__11 4;Y'.. , � - 11 >_ �i - - � I - - _ , - I �, - � / , I - _� � , � , � , � I I , / 211_- � I r _10 -, / KL 3. L'.0 - I �i 1,__ � I N\ '? " -, "I I - - - � -I 0�- __ I 1_ 00� i /,�, s, cy // I � ,r I , I - � _<. 0 _1 ; I I , " ", `��,r�, - � ,��"' ) �� I 1�) `!� _0111 1 z , 1'�' ___ " 1 - - - 0 -- - ! I / - � ";,,,.�,'_ I �____ _ ! 7�� _�� - ------�__ --!I-- - of a / I 11, ,\, __ -- ",/ I I., - I i I" I ") � I , ;, I -. `7 .--- f - 0 , , � " ,Z41 1 1 _ _ I I - , I _, ___ /I - .� " . � - , , - 20 - - . � __ I �', � __ . I � , , F I US if ,� , - , , , Q� I ,/, , / ,, - I - ,-, -1_7 1 / . I I -----tl .4 : " I ,� , I " " / / , i � -�,�_ � I � I I 1 / ��-i �, , �, ______ � I - , � �, i 31.-' : I "_�� ,� �, �/j' IIII� � � . I ,� " 1� �i- I i:1 I; X ;"s , i 1, '' - :��--- ,� I -_- - * , � I , 1,, , � I ,�o -_� - - " I , 1194:22' " / 01 - __ -�, / �, ,�, I -it:7�;�--0 -�� ,�1, e 11 51 . , , --- \ __ , 73�W 44: / I -_ I - - I I I -,- �� " � ,,-, \. I - , I / - - I i . - I I, � I --- ,. I I L ! I " � - ----,/, 0 t" I � - - __ . I � " ! _- � ,,, __ I I :1-1 It I \--L. "I 1-1 I I, , , �1, _�,''/ 0a� - - 0 �,_ I I �'i � - I �,i,, �- , "I,� / ,! , ,1 I \ "; - 2 / � I I, I , �, . . ---:r'-� 7"!� ,,,, 2 c , ,'- � "I � � I ,i �1_ I I / ; I% ---- , - - � , - , -- ��_ I � I "' 1, ." I I 1 , --,�< � ! . 33,- ____ /y/ //;� f f q / 1� i � /' - - -,,�-_-� I i\\�, ,, N � � -, �, � ', f , I 0: ____ I 4 , I , -- -;-- - -, ,. � , , � I 1, , - ,I I � �" 11 I � I I , � ; -1 - - � --`� � 'N,,-,-__,_,,� I k 0� / _____ 1, X--- - ", - �� --- 1, - �, I� ��, �,� 1 , " 5 i , -,_ 1 �' ; � = � I , -- , , , I I I I I I � _1, /I "I .�1,1111 �, I � I -1.--;, 'I'll \ '� I \ 'o-1-11 , co- � I - __ - Q � 1 0 / ; � I I i I 0 1 N � - __ __1' - ,�4 1:�� _�__ -,- I I -"T / "� � I I � 11�,,, 11 �-� _ - I � ,�` I ------- \l � 1\ - , I - , , I ) _f:��_ I � I I , " -, -- 4I � ; I � - � I \ \ 110_� Y. " I _A - -I - - I is' I � to � � ", / / I , / ; 11 , \ _�P� 1 � �,� \ V" I - 7 - I __ � �,, I I / / i ,, � . Cp 11H \ i l,� � / / _� \ � � I � I / - I / 1 0�; - � I , � � - ,, �, ,I I � I 1, , 4111. J I I Q� i - " _,� _,� / ,,, / ! , � �, �,,f-, I I I "I I ,%"L 1 69 --,i- ,i I I I ? , � �,Ifl . C� / � � \ I I I / I I , / I 11 I'll , I I ; . �' � �, I \ sm 1, 1, I- - I / ) - , , - 1, \i, I't " - I "I 1., \ " "I 11 , I \ � � /I � 1, I - I 1 � I L" " 1"� 1 � 1 h il , � \ - " , � ,; \, � , 2-1 i�-_ "I � f � I I I ,� I I i 'T - - 1 I - I '_I-,� -1 -- f 11 ____ � `��tf� I-, ? , � � :��,,,� , I -_�,_�7 , I , �__I / � \ I �r� I I , � � , � \ I A �� , I I I . A I , ,',� �""", NEW TR S H I -- ' I I , , I i 1, I / 1; " / � / / - _.- , i ,I � \ �� "It 11 �1\ � 4 6 1 , I _", ,� ; ,_ I- " i��,� I \ 1� - , __ � � i ,,'i� "' 1i . \ 11 � , %fi,4 . ,� , - --- r I � � A . I I I I - I I �� 11 " � ---I- - NCEI Q5. I L ) ,�, 1 � -- \\ I L I - , - I \ A . "'\ - I ,_�� / , ; ri �_ I -1 I �ji � - " � � � �1� I \ ,. ,2.' 1 1 - .11 � I,- / - I,-� � 1 1 � " \ EM , \ % , /` , � � " . I T = 24�25 , �. - I I -1 , I-* � '� ,/" " / ,;, \ .11 11� , % ho I, \� '� 'D f� '�, , " �1� , / .p, I *r* i -1 \ �_ I -_ I 10 I " I 1 Z�/ '� I - / I = 2Q.35q; Q � , ! 218 A I I , � \ 1 ; �0./ � � - �I - , - -, " _', , / 11 �-,-, � t I /_cl, �� \ I-_ / __��\ : Z',j�:V, , , \ , I I � I- /I / / -,, / ,fr � I I" ��k Q) I ,/ �, It/ I / I - _1 '.\ -- '2 I � � 1q, , I / 11 I _`1 � ", -� � ", ,,- I I " " / . � . I I:? , ,, I �1\ �,til" I iii, 21 1 � / % �, I % _�,,� 1 1�li I i --,,X 7 X i � \ 0 � 1 �, , ,� 11%. PICU-Sh A F?E A 1 - . / I - , �, % \ I i , ,_ // A f �(V 40,-�, -,-- "I , �41 �, -%I - , I __ 24(', , 0 / ". I � 1: _� J 1; 'i :1 1 i ,I,�I I ' �, � , �� , �� -� I I � - I f ot�,, � 1,* , \ I , ., (3-Z, , , _f: 4"", - , � Ir - �, 1, _,__�_ � \\ � I -,_',� I - 'T t�_< __,, ____ I ,. I \ r - \\ , , ,, , , - I - - ,�<,i z � , 1 / ,�,o - - 11�� -1 / " f l , �, \ TEE ) 4, �_ , ,� 1i � �� , I . .2 � 1 1 �f` , rA Z I- - C� 'k/ 1,� � I i : , r I ,�� , I � -- 'i 0-- .;�� CJ/,\ " 2 " " I y . - ,,,...,� - , ��k/ _ I r_� i � , ",Cb , �� . , I _� , , , , I � , � � \ _ "" � I � \ I. )� �-�\, �� 'T f \ z) � , '� � / / I� ----- - 16.,, 1 - .5 I � , - � / l� �1�� ,�� i '? ,'�, !I� �l,,'�,,i _- --_'-� -7 --,,, I 4� P � , \ , _ : I \ /..,. (:3 - -- F , V , _ I " -, - 211 OA I 8-0 HE I � 1 -4, 1 � f, I ' __ 1�1 I I, � , � 1, " ,, � ,\,;,,, I 4 \ 4 0 �N :1 11�, I - --MOE @�"1.007. "2 / 1 \\ it # I i j ,,,�`�, �, � 1�___.�, I 'r� !" ,i-'r jr/r� /' -1, � ��L ( _- "o N , "--\ ,2 , . , � Q)ik, 1 ,2 �� , � I \ � I \ I I (IV , 1 - I , / � , � I L k I \ �I , � , �, \ , _� � ,1��,7 ,� \ - , I � � I I i 11 ::rl 1- `� \ , I I " ., 1�I - - - -� / '�I: 1 " I �� / I // ", , , 11 - _:Z; .1 ''. I 1�� I 4 I I I I \ f di 11 \ 4) / - __ ,.---' � I I \ I �, , __ `� \ 1, I 11t, __ - , r �I I i I ,'f - _ " " --- , __ - " , � 1� \ , . I // - ____- - - __ 1, I /�',��i I " I , , " " I � ,: i � \ - I _>_ I "'. - 1\ 2- ___-__ --f-1 , \ 1, I I __ I I -. 2�� \ � � \ .;�. 4J .-�/� __ __ � t \ , -- I I -11 �-------- / ,"I , , 2;� X � i I � I 0- �1� , e --1-1- � - - - \11 1, \ r � 1- I'll - /; I - I-,- r - I 11 ;1 , I 44j , , I f uf Q� C'V-44� �t i - - , - � - x , I C - '. - -1 I� , I I , , 2'�11 r �� 7, �Z� - , -, -, �, 1--v �% �� \ , ____ --- -/// I I , ,� , _ I ; , � , - ___-1 - , - � I 1 � mV I ____ / , - __ - __ _ / � I __ 11 , � - 61 , . i \ ......; 01. 1 ", ___ - \ , _ I ;_;� , -_ 4J&0 - , -1 - , 1�� '� � I ,�� \k/ < , -__ -- , -,� , ,- -_ ,,, , \\ I . I - 11 , 1 , ; I I , � if ' ' , - - - , _ - , I ,_ , � N 0 " "' r, - , 1- , - � � I � �, i 441 ,__ .�,,�_, � / I �', , I I I NC 4.15.1 � 1, I � , - � � " I � - I I 1'0-,,"I r,.,,, - "�� , - �' / � I I �� ,:):%\�: "-4�� -,L--- --"' __ - , - � , I 1 , I i , � �1 I I - . , " / i I , -, � - , I I � �I �: , / �, , , I __ � I - , __ _ _ _-1 ,�, , 1-1 � I 11 f ! - -�' �/ I - . r T 9-620 � i I---, �\1 �, 5:5 --,�_ __ _- r ey 'I' _I : 2 . Ii I I I 1-1 8'I� I "--.,-,_'_,_1_ :11 "I / / / -KI\\ _,l_� - �� f/ -.-C, I I � / 19 - 'I'll , I- �) \ ,, , _�" 11 - - �__ --- I 1 1 7 � '/ � ,, - I J -- � ____ I, / 1 Wo , , - 11 - , I I r - k- - _l� �\ 1__�_ __ - -, -1., , I - I I - I , '10 - , I i __ ) I� ", " � , - , 000 � , _�1,1 " - .. � , I ;�" I > - " , _� I / I , I � � �: . / ?It' -f - --,_ . � �I 1 ,4,�, .� .� I __ -I - !, : �, - , " , � \ ", I ,-l"'. " - 11 r, � � � I I tk/ -- \ ,"V / ., ! I I � I - � I 1 14i- - . / "i � �-� ,, < -,, I / � � I " / I -,� � ''I I 1� Ir, - ,/ , - . I � � � - --�- I , __- - - - - - � I I I A I, I ,:�__ -- - __ / / I"� I I � / ,�� 11 , I- , �,- I _�� I - - � - - - I , � , -�;,,- ,�t � � I IT - ! I i I - I : :,,) �'_ _� ; , 4 'i �, � � I y ___ _�_ -i / " / � _-,'-1, �, , -I '' � , � \ - , � _il�ll-�� , I � 1, I � � " ,, �,,/I / , I , 0 - I _� � - - - -1 � / �, ,� , _,�,: � I � - � \ I , -, . � (? � , I % I - -, - I " _� __--__ I�_�. - - I I ; / I , -- I � ;1, ,- I �, ,�'7&t" a ,, , __kr --- � , , .. � , - --- - I I ,� , 32 A I I � I .a / _ - ", - - - , ", _'_ � I , , I .1 .i, I � - 1, __ -1 - ; / * 3ZRO / � �- -',.--- __ - , , \ I �i , _'r-,,! / -, I - � 11 1� ; � I \ � -I � !-, - -, ,,,, I - , I � I ,�," , , C-) / _)-, �, ,1% _! I I I I - . �", -)11 I �_ ",X�, , ,,z , , . -��- - - 11 �_, `1:,�_-1 . � , , 1� ,a� -- I, C/) _____ -_ ____ � � � I'' -,-- ;, -_ , \ . / I I �- , %i`� *�28.,�' 1 % -IT,-___ t / I / I � _� , ! _ - \ . 1-1 / - I I "I'll � '. � � ) -,: , , I -� - - � I ,_ 33.46 / a \ , I I \\ . - --- - I / , I ., -- ,4: �� ", " �_ , � , i I � ,�,, ` , 1 _" , - )C--.--- � __ - _____-____r��--, -- I, " I / - Ili ,, ; �', \ � � � � - I ��11 � I ,_ " � �I &(§ %%,j n i I - �', �� / , I I It 4 -- 11. � - V22�-, I I , - __,_�� I , I 1% ��, , - I- I"�,, ` , �I ___ I � � . I 1, - ,I_ I I I \ I I : , -,_�;.7 -- � I "' ,_6 "I - I ___ I A (Z' r" // - -I" 1 - - , � - - I� I � _��,:- X � I - I , - I I I. I \ �� I -1 , :",�-, I - 1. I - ___ ___) / I � , 4 � : ,/ ), / I , , .410 � -- -, / I / / I I � , I! i-, --,__"" --- I / 1� , t- I I" I , �-� 1, ,- , I " �,; /� : -- ": \ � i -A I 1"�, # -1, , __ _,_f�� '' __ �", I , , - - ,- __ I I - r- , I I _ - : . / 1 1 ;,_,�� I �� ,!, 1, ( 1-_____1 ,� , ,, , , I ll I�-_:_�� lip - I _1--____ � � I ,, - I I � I \ ,:,,� -- � ,- -� *I � " / -, ,�, " I -i , / / __ ----__ � 1�P?), . , . " �K� . A ., I -, / ,r il - , _ I I ------�) _�,_ ,� / � __ - --,- - I I .� ' , I - I- --- � -, ("\ - I I �,, , I_�I _ I - , ___._� I __- , I -,\._�, I � I "" � " ,� I I` 1, - ,� �:f __� __�_< , � __ ,/ , , ,:,� ': ,,, - < I �Cff 0 -\-----g :,""'.1 -"� / -,------ - -- -__� __ --- / ,I � , ,� , 4,./ r � I - ��__________ " :, k,u I , k ,I 1'1,_�- � ,I : .1 5.0-�- t-_ ' I f- I r !,�// e < � �I " -I L,__��;- -- I z jt� -- -----------,, " �, i I 1, ,,,, _1 `�� ,� _�� / /�-, 'Y44, I I � - �__,_i 1, � 1� 0. I,,I I _�, --- ,- .1 , / I - � I 1: ,:T � ILI-, , _�,, __ I , 11� � .0 I I�, � _,____A ,,"�- ,_ -1 I I _�_ / T, : 9i � I 11 ,,,,,, " I :�, `i� - ___ I - i : i ! , �j " �/ I I 4 ; - "',,, , , "I - ___� 4 / , / 11 11 � I , % - , T", 1 � ./� I " I '� � ',(3", �, ,'(�;)I` - � , -1 '� � i ,1_1 \ __---��/ -� , 11 r - I . I r2 , A: 7 -_,-,V"i, , - I, I / � L� , I I / I, - - 'T -I- Z � , ,�', '__ _-�'� " , - 1 .-- r / , Qd � V - 1_7 ��, 'I, I � 1 � ,��,�, -1, --- - ! - - I li I C11 I I 1, I I - ,� I, / I I "" -, ,, � I I 11 , __ - i � ;Yr - ,� i �:�f 11;�k�',Q)- 1, I , � � - ", I _�- , , 1 4_�4:Zi V " - ,; I ,.I':,-- ;Yr t/ " , ,�' ��:�' _� I , / , - - " 6z - " --,� ,IN AR _� 1-1 , , � � I I �� / I - ." -I �_ ; ,1 I ��. I i I , - :Ih - I W__ , - ------ - - --- - - - - � I/""It � // ' 'O�,,,,, ! 1, - � ,. I 'I 1, _�, __( � 1 I \ I I-- , , N, ..,�,,��, - �, �7 , - it , I I � " ' ' `�� /" ` ,,�--- f I , , _�� , _��_, 03 ,� '-'T- -- ___:�� i / i I IQ0 // , I I � f, I � , � I I - I -,-. I I I , I I -, TY, I - ��,- 11� , 7 ��' -�� I � z�& I 1 : , _- " , , - � / � I - , " '.. � I -��--,-�C- ,*- �:` ,�"! -��-_-,"-_,,_�-, - / ! .- 4�1 �" ," 1�, �. � � , .��,,�� , - - , . z ) I -,�,/ _� �__ - / - I 1 I�,- I I I �I - � '' , � ,11 . &O 1, I . �� -I'-- __-___ -� , , I ,I I , �?"-, � ) t 4 \ �,1,1, \ I -- 7 � , :� , � __`�__ _7__ 7 I � : I� � � I I= 3M30 i� , I I-,-�,, ,A i "I 11 _ -- . -�_ - - - "'l-, 35-1 ! \ , � 2 ��' ,�,�, ,: � � - 1, _ - " , _ / "� , - - - ,��f,�,-, ��,-, , - I I � '_ -, , , I ,- .1 , _� - 0-30 "V , , , - , - I P (- --- - I _� � I , I i , �- "- 11 - I � -� � / , , I '- 19.81 � / . , � , __-��_-i�-:!� , I il - � , - lz� %`% � , , , I � - - 1_: , , I / ��_Ii�+_____ I-----" '---7' - -- I I -�, , - 11 I _,T)14, __1- ,� r I : 139.81 -, �/ , � y . - - - __'�,11 ",, - - 11 f 1\ ,_ __ 7 1 ,_ 01 , I \, i __. I -1 I I , / 1, I - �_,- �� ( __ /,, I f# i li��"__ - , 10 _,,., \ / ----, ___- I I ., -, _ I I _� - I I I \ � -_,;"�-_ " , I/ I / I I � ,� " , ,� 7-_!Z: ,-__---\ ----__ EA-: , - � �. - r I I , I , , , - ' - '---- -i"of t ": __ , -lf4 � � � , �_` , � I-__ - !,q4�e . - 1 , �1�_ - 1� ,,�, � __ I I L-,-- -,� - ,�Iy \ -_ __ - r 1. ,,-�` I, , , � I 1) � - __ I ( I'--- I _�_ I Q , - - , Q ; I� ____7L��--_------,1 -- ----�L!_"� L�Rl l,,t -___� I I / - , " �- I ,�7_ !" �-�< , - ,� " , ;", / �� . �V_ 1� -__ �_ , I � , , , -,� , __ --- - - I I� ,,, , �%w _,U, , I e , 1- , , � 1� , -: ___ ,, --- F r , 7"��/--- ` / I- _�! __ �_ - ,� �_ -- , , - NSMH 2.6�. _-, I - � _� jr / , / --- - - � _(_ t o �', � , ,/ � , 7 � / . ,-,,"r , ,_�_�, � i . , ,7�_-,�- 1 it / ; - , I); __Al / I / / I � ,__�_ - ___�- 17--,1 1 �_ " , �Pp,-i'-t 6 : -, � ,�Q I ,/ 32 1� /I 1p, tT"- __ �,-,�-,_�:-_---_ _� �� ,-I , -, in ) , r � �� _ \ ,��f/,/,,, �- T � 28.40 I- " to I 1 1 , ?I � I ___ , % I/ t�l - -/,` ! y ---' I , " -, _-i , I � I I , - - 1 ='24,40 i C&G / , -, "..� ; -" 11 - " ") 7 __ __1 , .1 I - \ - 1 _________ , I ; I - - __ '/ _i_�,',�_ J_ -, -,- - - _� \ � ,' , ,� C4 , � I I, / � - , , @� , ov�__ --- - I I I '' , ,,, __ :; , � � '.. , - � - J- ----I : ,- , _ ; __ , �, 1 - I 4� � , , , " �, 11 ___ , `_�, 'L� X -- - --- :""-I-, \ ,� "/ I- I - I - i � _____ -,- - - , ` ,��7 4" / / : �, , - __11 I I " � �, ---- ---- , ,-./ ,, : , "� .00��, , ,,,- ,_ I 1i �7-----t ,(�� , I _:l;�:�,-i-- , I �- - ,,�, , , I . / - __ - , , 61' - I I I - � � � � � I /, . ='t V,;� ""e�,,� ��",:: .. 0, _ -7 - i 11�f 1 /,;" � "__ - I / / " � - , � - ",,, � �., - __� // I __ � - � - / I , / I �, -, - Y I / _0 X- , _`_ L - � - -, -,-- -- I I I I�I,11` Qz i I , \ -1 1, . I i -11, ,, I I I --11 1� _-� " " __- v, - - , ;-, 4 , , � � � I� �, %r -I'-, , I � / , �\ ork �_�_;, , , - 1 2 , :�_-,--_�, -1 I �> / __ 1 , � I - _�. I i � 11 11 12 1_L��__ - 1 7 ,- I I "_, I __1 , (�) �I", 1, I I ! � ___ 1, _ - , ,; � �_ , 1� 11 I / , ,!, / 'M I..J- . __ 11 1 --;I'-A , I of � ,� - _ll� , - A " , I - ,,'� - I -< - , ,, I , , " �, �, ; I - I I , \\ I �, � 4 ,,...�,- I/�,/ ,, 'r' " 'r J_ - C : C_ 46 I` - _ I I i,, "� ': I / , I :_ ___- �, ---; � ,,�All' � � I 11 , / It I / 4<., _�, I 1, " - � , ;, - ",, I I 1)�0 , 1:�V., . I I I i , X - '- "' /-11 ,-1 _1�v � 21150i "�I , __;� ; 1 ij \ I 1�/ , �/_,I I I . � NMH , -, , \ � -,� - ,,, -A, I , "� - , ,1 I_�, , " � 1( I -�, 1 -I' 1, ,�_ I I I 4 � , , 1�4�11 /I /1, - - 4 6 I ,- � A- - I� - -zt-,- �, , _\� V r��;� //,�/,^,: 1 )9 , I, 1�?,�' , P, I I , 77 / -11.1 ,�_ Y I I --I - h?, , 0 RAL PTLOANMS�FOR i I - , � /-�4,,� . ,Z4 - -& * , I -11 4 �! - , � e I� I , I 11 i I 1 !11 1 14� , , I " �� I _i_ T S ) � i - - I - , , - � � , - . ; I ,�_! ' /_� i ; 0 , - -1 , � I I W 0WAHE R �-�_,, -,. -,(3�-- ,1 1, , n ___� � 'I , �, I-0/'/' 4 I �b A �: I SEWER THROUGH AND/OR , 1� -, _%,Z I r '. I "U - - -,I I T_ ,�,�t� I� UNUVI ITHE P i ROPO$ED I i I "� ", / - "�, , I - - �� - -1 , � , / - � '00 0� - � I ,,, I I I -.1 �_ MH't-L09 4 ,� , BUILDINGS. I I ," 'I : "'� "� � �' 1�)' 1-NSMH:-.2.d�.T- , I I � I I /11 . , �_ I � _� , T, -;k ; 1 q I \ I It __ I -- - I I -- ,, f4 -,, --iNs, I ; ! ! i , I Mho -- I - " - 1��_" �; -:,�, � / P_ \ = I I I ,� I I,,, 4 , _Q_l`_ ;'1�4 �,'�: � I : - �, , I i -_-� r -N,t- --1� , 1 1 '4�0 � 1 1 : 17 A - I I �_ , I ___- " _,,, " %.J Z , 1 Ali \ , - (b� � - I = 25. -Y 1 l�4 , � - �,,h ��-, �� -0` , -1 = 25. � i LJ_ A An I 11, : I I � I � - - , � ll I = 2 :_ \ �> , , C I & T 1 i � � 14K z!� - - `�-� �� , -0. , , - - ," I z �", L, , 1,I e I p 1 1 Q ,,� : I � / 1, V - k �" iy�I - � , / I � ; 1 IT - / , 11�__ / I I . - -1 I I I i . I I/ � � -" 11 � , f �� I I I i / 1 3?5 1,I -1-- � \-\ I, I- �1�, I - � , � I ) / / _j t �, I _ I , ,el/, , - -1, I � :--ll - --, � � , "' �� I , i , i ---__ I I, N I " �� _�, I �_ -i , , - ir 1 R I � / ; 11 )----- - /; "-��, - , "7 �_- ,-__`��`31, 1 1 - - r - ' __ , , -------- , � - NCQ 4.1 Ll 11�1111 � I -i / 0 ,&.4�, �, " - � k�l ! � � ].,:, - , � _� , " � , , i - - " I ,_ -1 � cl , - , , 5-�� 1 �11 If , , . - - � -, �--,,� - I - n '-ft_` I I T _ I - �__ ,-�-_, 1,; � - I I � ,, I - I � I �, 1 �, - -1, r _' ' '�"� , 11 ,� � ! I / � -, . �� - - / , 4' &7 C14 / ",�l - I �, , I ,,, __ /, - .1 I : Q5 1� ,AN, I ; � - I _,� \ / __ V __ - - 11, / I _n I I � /1" I - - LC) " , / "I ,I - "I 11 I I I , I I r � _ , 1 E J� / --,,,,, \ I I t, ,� / � " - , - � , � , - I I ` i � , I , " __',I�� 1,_� ____ - �,�.- - ' / � ,.,,� [ , I A,, /� ,� V �' I �".�, ,,_, V �,�� / I -,,," I = 1919 N5 , �, -,,� � _,", I * 7". , _� - �� , / � " � I \ / �,f� I � --,,, I , _ -1 ! - ' ___ Ir f-- -11� -2 ' \ // - 1 �" \ 1"� , � ,� - " - 7�/ - � _� 11 " 11 , 1-33 .12. i - 4. __� , 1, 'S�.A j----,i / ;� i f 11 ,�" ,,, ", I I i -3-- �_ - , - , I I I 4, / i 'I, ,�, - � ",�, / � J A 4 i I I I , __ . ., ��_ - 7 _ �,� I/ I , ?�11, I � r , 4�1 I "/;/ �,� TEE I � __ - I I I __ - " T,�: y "�?_ I 11 J, , , � / � I V ,; o7 1 1 1 ;. I I I , I- - -----1, \ ',�>,-:, -- -_-�', 1�__.---__ -,,", -__ - 5 'v__�. 'I,, � �, __ / 11; , ) , I � 'r $1 1; �', -, I ,--- - - �, ,-, ,- I ! 0101 1 ,9'j"I'_ 7 C 6 � I =!' I � ". ____11_______1___ ---- L11 - " __ 11 "o,-- � 13 � , 91 1, -1 11 i i e I � , - - � - - __ _�, ,,-, � I ��&'/ I I , -11 �7 _ , - ____ ; V, - "" / A A71 IF"- ; . , � , .4 , , , ----,- -______ - __ - i -� , - i i " I i, - !_,Q�t t 0, " -- / 1 .) f ; �� __ -1/ __ / -I /I , �Z�1 ,; i I \ , , I _____ -____ ___ _,�� _%,_f,,' " - ,�� oil -.1 I ii - T '.'-' " - / __ __ Z 44 �� I i , ___ L � -, "I I : '18,93 � I ,,�,_-, ,,,, ,,, � � I \ ,\ _? _�, � � � -,� ___ __ ,_ I / ,' � , I � ,5 11 �� 1111� I / ems � 4- - V \� - - I , ;� 81 . I I I I -_�r - I . 1 1- I /&� - i /I 1, � , . ��, ,,� - %��Y I "I' "I---- __ �,I --- �I I I _�,I- , I-- - . _-,;�, -t� ':�- I I r / " � . I - " __ I �� I i " _J ,- ,V ! /, "I, � 1 32 4 1��n-� . !N�_� / / '"i. __, . / / I i i I _�______- ,____ i , I / '_ � 4- 1 0 1 5 -� , I , � I __ I I I I I / I ", , ''. / I __ �,� , - , , �_, I -" / / (7� ,� ; 11 6 1 --' � : , / I 11-- �_/ , . J_ -W,. I � ; � ), __- , , - � �? A I t ; I �, __ � 1� I I / (�, ,�_ '' I __ __ " , . t",,� r / - I I , - - S " �, ��_,- " __- 1 � W ,;`),�'' , , - ______ -I----___ , �� , � I � � . � �",, ;� N I/ 11 1�\- ,-�, 4�� J I/ i /, )` I ); I I� -, sag I NCQ 4.13 0 , 2 ,,L / � ; . / � � �, '? 1, I I '_ A- % I 4 j Q-Q7S �� Ld ", ; 1 __z �1; I ,�/ I - , I : / � , - 0 �� ", k, __ - 11 --l-, k, , / - /11 � V' i � - , �, / 'U 11 I- "'.1t- " , - "I OP - , /__1_ 01 1 : 27..611 __ - I \ %_ ,�1, - __ \ , I I � , , �. I., _V I / �,, 4_� 19 I 'U�_ 1,11C - " I-- " " ,,'-------, , 0 1 8'�.,� "I'.i-il � I \ � -,-,,-,�, --,,-< - I / I ,, i I _�_�, ,'�" i /�', ,, \ � '�, 1'� - _111",�"Ii_ "I / I , - , /, i " I I -1 I I I � , , , ! , I z� �., / 4, !" - 18 9 -, X 91, I 4 it I 1 , / J . \1 , f/ I ,11 ': , , � - - - I �, � - - I , , / ,_ \ 1 , /� ,-I. 4� 1 , / )(,�_i 7-) 1 `" � I " -.1', ,__ \ , I / I I I � I / 11 K, \1 1, N A 1 , I."A 12-1 __ ,� , , ,I I 1� X, �1� : (, ,-� � � - �, 11P -1��,\�,;� I 11 I - , / I . ,_6 , , ", �, I,,, �� 1// - � L � �, r, 11:Z1, I I I -z- �, L-1-1�ln ,,- t,,��,, _; `k "I� I ;f i i Ct) _/ � / so / , ' ' I ,. �xl/ I ,� 11 - \ ,; , , , I - 1, � WX , \ / " - I � � �" I I � i / � e4� ,�I I ,:�-- _� _-;,. 3� I , I *1 / ,� , � . _�1 1'� " , ,I --z L-- ,---I ,,,-- i /\ %, "��l , I i -?,�' f, , - -, , 0 � / 1� 0 � "L, � .,., -,) ," , - 4 ;1 _.__ if�_� I , " , )�), � ; / - I I � , UJI � �,m // _'11 � - ��, �0 �/ I , I , - I _-malt __ - __ __ -- - - 7 ", L �_�L X 2, �7 1 - _�.L -- I , , __ i I �u - I " / ' I - I �� " 1 - 1� - it 2�� ,� , / " P" 1 � - -__ ___ . - - I I i / \ I I , � " / - - ��' �1Y,4 i IN%-;t � / / �__ - 1 / z _ , i y �n , � "I ) -: � 4r L , i i, k, ,.I ". \ - �, � t L""I, I-, I _,�,L_ 1� Ld �,oD. . , � - I I I , \, I'll - i,. __ 30. � , , - . - - - I ---"---'- 'L - -, , % I I '? i L 1 - � I � i / - _ , - - , , - ; � - -1 I : I i i * 100 _ L 0-7��-,�, 11 � I ' , (-1,41 _,_ , , , 1� , , I - I I " ! ` 2i ____ - -- � � ! 1- I I -� ,_ I I I _-L - " ' "L�/ , .�' _ � : " , -11 PC , , , , � I I�, � - I ,_,� - , -:' I 1- I �, __ " I I I � � I— _,� / __ ,; � 'L\, , �'�;, )'p _____ / 11 _�i ,L " ��; \ I I I V) .0 , , r - / I I , �__ I I 7:__ - :__F --------- --�� - I . ___ � I ,�L .T � ,Q�) I " ,f - ____1 , 1, � I-- __ ---" ^_ L_ ---/--- - t 9 , "I", , ��'L' , I I /',-�-J , , __ __ __ - 1 6. ,-� / i% A , " �.j*��J, R,, 01 - P 1� ___ , i" - I 1, 4 1 I I I - ,� , , , 4e�__*I ," - __ '. / /7 ___ L� , � ' _� / I ____ / - - . ""-� - � - I . 11 _� I ' ' ' -- I L __ I ' Ty 6, V I � L 1�, - ' I I � � I 1 !�5 -- ---- - - _'_. � \ ' - 1-- - - I ! � ��111, " -111'' " ") / f,- vok a I, .1-3 /� 11� � \ /� "7 . �L � \ �,' . I Ii 7 P I , - - _____ � _:,-------_�- ---,,,,,--,-; __& �, / , ____�L \ ,r' I I I -1 1 , , � I S, / ,.,r , , I P 1?. , t , - I I I I . I , � I � i 1 2,�, . , . __ - , "�_ . 1 k,I L - , %a ill 41 � "" " ,, - , - / , 11 I , ,,, ��, -1 , , -; � / 1\ / I 1 1 1 ,� ,- / ,' _L / -1 , i __ � ,�, ,, 1578� IQ) 11) 11 - I I I \ 11 ,1 1 , __ . , ,. . ____-74_.�1, - � I, I __I I - - - I p r i CS I , �,: � -, I " i � I � / I , 'I � � �'� I , , , _ ; _', , , � , / , I / � � ,� I , , - � , � " - - \ r , � � ` " -1� 11 V;__ , ", (_1) -tl-. 4� 1 / � - ___1 :�; I I C / I z , ,_ L - -- , , 9 1 In V , - I - IT16 - . 7 / I , , "� 1� ,� /", . I I 11 I cc 1 1 � l, / / _____ -- - - - I -I , I " _1 L ,______ _ , �� -, , I ,� ; ; � 1, I I I - - __ / , " _' L / � I ,l I :: I I / : � Ci 00 I - It' �--- - _ __ - -____ - __- I - - I , ,� ��_, ___ � - / - - t %, I I � ft - I - I f 1 , VRET11146 I __ I - , _ �� 11 M I,- / , � I V ia I I TA 1 1 � "" , " I � - I � , r I I - / , ;\ W ,J .,, __ -__� , I , t I 11 �', I' ' , , , I ' '� I I I � , , - I 11 I - tr ll �, )fi�', , , :�L_. -;;, _____ _-, , , -, 1'', - I I "' L , ! 11 � ' '/ / , 11 - � ill ____;;1 - � 1 I ,�, - / I ; , ,�', � � 1 1�_ &, 6 I r _______ � , L I , 1 1 " __ - , �, � �, ,_, L, . I I----,-" x it ,,�,' -,� � Y�y ; X / & I = !MUD NSMH , L I I I ,L__ , - " � � - / I :: _, 'U'llA r , 1, I'll �_`,; - ,,� � , 'It I I o�> / i - __- I , : / �____-�!, , � ,�'i I �-,' I L : L,�F T = 29.0 �,,, I I - I ) ily., !,I I , ,,, i _�. - * . ,, , ,------- --- I - - J I 11 - � �1 � 11 I I / L __ � ', -f'r , � / 5 1 \ ,_�� I/ ------- ---" L / - __ __ I - . I 1, - �i ",I 11__ i 1 T(14- I , I I / 1 1 � , --- I, 0 �. , ,_/ . - I -1 'L I 11 f� I I I - I U I I I -_� � I I - / I � I , N�'1.b6.6� , I- /, � ------ - - . � - I , I IP11- / 1 7 C, ,) ,_ �'," , All ,// - I :,�, I. : � ", I I ,� � _J c � /-,, I I i,� ' I I _� y".." .)/7 � � \ :�----- , __/ I L , �, _�' - � I , , � I� I . / � :� ill � tml' �I, �, 0�1 __,f__ - ____ / � __ % I � - 11 �11 9 ; I L � - -1, I . / 1 1 I I I " _ _ ___ _ L ,L �/ I It I o/ , 'L I � __ / I I " ,� "I i I - ��,_--__ �' __ I I-- - __ . - � 1 -7 1 --'& �i I ge"' �L - , I_ . I �i�'L / , 1 i , , 1 -, ��,, � '' L /, I I I A / 1 n 1 L I -,11_ ,,I,,,* / , / - , IL ' - � /, - 11 , ! -�v; - I "', -_�`I,z 1-142, 1 , t 1 1 1111,��,; I . L I - , - ; , �, � I lia��` � � , I � � � I , , / .1 i � 1_��/ - , I Jbmmlm"" 'I : ,-.,..-- --L-__ _ ( , � \ , � - I " 1,_ ------ �� ' / , 1; I �I z: -11 11 If P I I i �%�, I "I I _ __1��, / / - __ 1 N,E 41 FIRE LANE / k I 1�1, : � fl� � 'I; I - 1 � --§' / I" I I / �7."` � 11 - - � -- / � � - - � i , I I / �� 1 L, / - ' I If i ! / I - , _ I L" , - L/ ,� _��.'z ,.L;"- ',�' i . I � / � I �,-�-` _ _ L I I 11 , , I ; I 1.�, ('11, / _ 8 a I " , � / 9 - , "'r,�Wr r� \f i �T f '.1 I -, , / / t � I I : I % 03 I.W;r 11 ;, � (6"x20' STABILIZED SOI , / ; � _'_� L" 4� � I f / �� I �_, // `, I I L 11 I IT I , , . I I, I I �1' �, � / ,� . - - - _":� / - I I I r I I� 1��SE) I I C� , I � 11 I � L --- 1 li, 2,1,1,, 4z) � / Q, , � 1 1 At, I : , � 1 \� � � // 1,I 1� " , I r / \ I I L . I� I I I'� I / I I 11 4�4" 1 1 if � �) . T �: f9.25- '�' L�I�4.' ' /1 I Y, � l, �m ; 1.0 . � i'l. I I , / " / I I �I 11 / 'I I / . __ � �' I'll � , , I �I� z�f 4.( 11 11, L / 115.25 ,,r-\ I ) 1� � I / 1� : I " I I'll", -, I --------- _f / . , , , )�� .) (:� �, �s I 7� � � Q), 1 �7 __,, 1111 "I ! 11� t I I , -I/ - � I - - - i I / � I , , /I, /I , = ,, I � 1, ,��_ , , I / - � / . � ' I � / � I; = .0p , I I ----. L , �,- , - / I , I - - I / A 1, --- � e / I I �l� CQ 4.1 1. / x 3) 14(�) _�. \_ � - i I � i I ,; ; I ,- " ,/ //' ; 'L I -- � ,,, 1) ,� � I ; I � - I Q a , �,,�"I / ��,,,/ � I ll .64 ! .1-"- � I I � / , . � 1 ,/ "� - 'I, � I , I � (�'�'(, V�zj //' LL i �;� I . I I �_� / n q T = 217, , I l 4 __ I 1 �, ,� / , , i i � 1 -, I � I I 11 / t //11 , I I "' I � L, .1. - m 7 � 1 � r� 161-18.0 �! L I = 10.I) .2 -I, lV / I, \ l 11 � - / �, - I It I 11 I i , � pm�f- '.)in I I I I q � " I I /1 -4.� I - ____ 1 �,,�_ -y- I , � � -� , ''. , , f, : / " \ LL \ .0 __" __--1 f,;) \ x I� I / � 8.59/ � ,r " � L� - __ 1_� L -,, - / � �,!.��o , 1 � ,�, ": z/ , '1- i I \ / / � , - I / 1 4 1 �' -__ L_ -,- I / I � � -, � _, 4� 1 1 . --- $ , � \ ", I I, I ,_� , \ I � ,4 I I , J , - , . / -1 , , r ; "" � \ ", l �� I 1, - � I ' I ; ;f � T,= 1 � � / , / / - J t \ - ,�1L i I I - .00. I A. I t�L I " _�� , \ - i "ill / 0 i � I �, ill - 11. N � 1 __ ------ , ,�ttl , \ ` , , , , r .� V;$ \ � I I/ 'L / "I I i L -1 � , � \ NQB 4.11.1 f "- I . I �, I / ,�_ ____ --- , I I \ 11 I I - - , , , , � .1 - �z . . . _ It� ! / i I // I !,, �� I �- 1 .49 ;E � � \------ , t, I / I L .. _,_� - ? __ I , ,f " , _', , , , I 1 , ! � I \ . I I , / / � , - , \ k ' L I - � � � I Q � � ,/ t J 11 I')/U, - L ::� � � ; I f I I � - , , \ , - , / I - I , " - \ I __ " 4f I r I I � �, I �, i � ' 1 2 � - \ T � 25.75 "I I - � I I - I I I I `,ill", � � ' L L - I -1", , � I = 1826 1 1 1 � __ (::) / 1 I I / :L I ," 4 , I / I I I R L L - � . ! ��, I I __ / _1 0 - � , , " \ \ �,,, i � , I / �, 4 - - , cl-/ ),,/�, �L I ,, , � - , ` " � -----p ,, I V/ C3 I �1, # 46 ,,rr,' I " " , - _/ , _,J I I 11 - , \ , , , I __ - e , *I` .. --, , � L -,��-� : f , /L i � Ice-le i � �: I - " 1, '_ I I 111;� i ' I : � \1 v I / I �/ , I \ �� , Z r "" I L � - -_��_ /, ."�, I 0 , i I 1� ,r t// � _; �,,,' \- ,\ I / I :�� / I ", I - I � "I I r� _� _' I / , / f �, L, \ � . � ! --, ,��7�ij 1 , (3 � ,C)-, S� _; � � - ,�__, / , �L I / ') I I - , � , , I - - / L � I r I � I , &I �_ - , , � , � , " / , I �r Q L , , I _�__- 11 / 1, �/ - f -� A I �� 4 A -, 11 I -Z, I - � \ i ,r,;_!'/ ; I � / - _ I / / , - �� __ 1, - .- V J I I ; I - � I � , ;, , 11 z -��,�'__ , 1� - A � , I I / -, , / / - I I- / 'Z'4() ; / ,� ��00 � I � ,:�i \\ � I I *._'L' , / 1 '!� ,, 4 / , I / r '_ , \ (1-0 , / I��f I "I, yv A i ) ; I /1, , I �� I a-,A_� /\ �b' - r �_4 "I I' �, / ,�1, / 414 1 / r I?I- �\ 1 , I \ -�- �,, " , , , - / - / " -a'k i , , " I, - � ,�e(�, � , � \ � I I , , , \ '' - I __ . \ � , -�-,,/ __ ! "- �� - I I I I � � I �'- � , __ � / ,,, i -____�_ \ I �1, - � , � � ,Z� � I , If I 2A I I, '_ I 1� i, Q77 I I (Z) 1 \ // _ � \ / , . � W 11 I I I I / IV I - - - I I "' ; , 'I, ""; ". ", / 1� .i \__ I i As " -4/ I : N" \ ' L ' \% '\ \ / / /' � �- % I/ f! _/ "___�' I I L I/ I 1 I` , " :, ,, � I I.-,� k- / '81 1 �V " , I t � / - ! __ ----I ---- r, / -,--- I -, ,I , ��IT -01 �? 1 \ / I // I I / � � , I 1� I I � ,/� i I � ,, I : ��11'*`� 1 �,�,�C� "I ,, , / i L 0 ""I ; : ./ I� i � / I / �,ZL'tr I I C),, � , �, / ,��,7A,:(Z) "y 1 I I� 1 1 1 0 ) ,t'. f i \ L I I I I I_ J \ / I , � , Q .31;r/ 1 I . \ �, I I I r / � � -� � , I LL��,,, I 1;I , , N _.�� / ' , , �, ,* , �� \ , I - � I ;` /' ' -1, V__ , , \ ", I I I �W, / I �I., \ I 'L �_,, L- " I I ;�� 1 I , L... I � , � ,I , I I 1, , z r," I 4� �1 (-, � \ / 0 �,r'/ I � I . . li, 'L/ ,,, �I _ il , , , : L_e ,r (i % I I V, / \ I I 1 , L I I I 01-, / ,�) ' - � I I \, , t, - ETC&�, % I I" I I � � I I 0 / 0 I / ,�,-1 44, 4� I, "I I I? `_ INSMH�1 08, ", � "L I I \I , , � / � � I I P?�), , 0 I'll I -,__- 1 14- 1, - "':( - ,�" -1- 11 __ , C __ I \ I'll i , ;' 1 __ , , , -- -, 11 I � 1 ,�% 106. / ��_ : , i� -/%,/ I :1 , .I I , 'r A , , , ------, , / � llqv�- , \ , :_� I - , - I 1, , � -I---- - / � I , ,,-�k_,`'/ T,- 2150 , / , , - I , . " � .. I� - I ) I ,� � - ! L l i 7 I , W"-� I- � � � / \ : k" , \ -/ I ! __ - , - ,! I ,f-- JP I ! = 1�.82 �'�� . - , L I 1, I / ' 2 1 - I 11 9 gl, .;�'C' I I _7 . ,tt', ,�,� / \ I I I I � _',r " , �, ,I I I\ I 'L �_,I - - I, -.1 - � - I I :-2 O:5'08 � � � PP 09,� ,; I . - ,� ---- _ , LL _� - \ � �, I _, � , -,-,_-L - P t 1 ; ; I - __ I I <�11�, / I - � ____ __ .-I \ I I . " I z �I I� " - __ - __ ,- � Q�, ,I I I I / I __T -- �I / i I . ! I I It - � ."8/00 r ,' . I ''I IV ,. , ,: il _ __- I .�_, / \ I _____�_; -`_ ---:-- - ,, / , I \ f, t 0 1 2Q5.0 - I , I " ____ L_.-- L / � . -�_7 � r � "i ,I, i .. / 1.-, , r 11 I , , , /,_, / ; -,-- -�--__ 11 ; 1 A A \ I I / � - I �� I L L ; � �i,P , / �,�' I!" / \4 = 0 �, , If �, �, . 2.11,��,\\ " I L / , [ � I I - ;,___ -- 1 - �3 I Q) r � . I 1� , \ I I I , I � , .r ,, I, ',- ,_ __- I �I- __ 0 % '' , I -, ,lZ-- ) 24.75 1 1 - I � ", , ! / � r , - / 30 ,� I 1_'Q1 _ , I -� \ / I ,� ; , ; / I-li - - '-- 1 W" I � /, / I , IQ (V L \ ; ,! I L, I , I � , I � 1 / �� w I,- � � � ) I I __ I I , I� ___ I : . L- I '' I -, �, ,; " , , " I �, ,IT, � I I I / I ; 1 ; . �� , - "'i � __ \ I , ;` . - I � _Zit , I I r I � I , I r , , - .. � , , . I / � ;�7&40 ;/V , - ,; ! . , �_ I i �� , II "I " ", i � -I _ � , - - 11 I - - I 'I,/, r " - I �� L , " // ,r / � / -" r �5 �, , \ -,,- I � �:) ; , / - -- I I I r , I f 4�t,�, t - I I I - - � , I - -- - , , I . ,,,N Q ,� - r , , � , -I I-_ � ' ".1 I , t 27ZOd, I / I ,�,_ -zr - N 0). : � I I , ". ,r ,, I �� / _ __ I ,� / / , 6 ,-� -, 11 / t " � � / , , � : ! , 1 I - / I � � I _ ,- I , / I -, I I - I ,I i I � * .� Z I , , \r , �� , ,-A,Z-0 N I � ,� I I '� 1 ' � ,, 11 / I , ,,, I I---, .. " "I - - �L� 11 . � t, i ' � - I!I 11 4 e I , ., _�, I I . - _____� L � /� f :; l � t. \ �� --1, I 1: /'� r / NrR .;i , 1; ,� . I, --I T L I " � I , I I , I - I , " " � / , , � , I , I I %" ,_�-_ -L�4 I 11 �,',� : , 11 � &�, -_ _� / / , 1 � � � �, I I /' \ - � __ �4__ , � / I , - I I ; I � �, � 1-1 / , ��; L/, ,'i, I �� ,/ - __ � �- / ' L , I __ ,- / I �__ - L � QJ - L � -11 .L/ \ , -L , I I = 1125 1 �11 � I � I -C� � 1, , I - ,:�, ,, � , I I I , I , i". �_ I I , li� i I - - I - I I I . ;-/ ,,,, _1 --- -,----- - I ��/_ -----/ : r I I � I I i I 1 � \ �� , ! I� I i i I'1� I . � L: L " � I L , - - L 01, I :I,,-i I I i 1, , \ � , ! i � , 1,� ,� -1 - I - , ` 1� � I - __ L � ',I, I �,, I � / I__ / -- , I , , I _ - "I . I , - I \ I � '. / �, I , 'D I 11 ____ I I I - __ - � / /I / I � I \ , /�__ , ,- I I ; // 1 - is �, �,:_, �_._ ,. r� I - - _i�l I " _____--,---��,,,- ---- -------- ; �\ 7 27. ,I . I �, -I , _�_,�'L_,,�L; I ,%% 11 I . "I-___J - I :1 � - 7', " I / r 1) �� - _ I I I I, I f I : 0 ,_ .�,,,, ,�:,,��, � -, q, T / irr , , I � I L �':' - _ , 11 I , \ ", , - /� -_ / � I I / , @-, a / I ,f 1� r, I �/ �, ie , - , I I � , Y L , I ----I , � �/ 'I : NEW PHAL ING .J/ 11", � i � � t" � ; � , I �:�.QA- � I �', � I �v / /` r I I AREA- : I I 1, \ ,,, , &� I I I/ - �� .-,� t. I '��'rr my ""1 ! 1, . _ � ,,-...- ,/ I , -Q ,I / li, , �, I I I- I , �, I � �, / �L, � '11, I i ",�"/ � ' ` 1 / I '; � �' _� '/ 11 ' - I., "I ; �/ -1 " r -52 CA - � ___ \ "' : � L 7 , I � ` ��_ 1b, am �S I , I i I , , 'i 11 : i I _ZDINING & CIL Y PARKING / I ", � I " ,_ ,� I � __, � � ,� '90; %_ �L , � I / , I/ 1 4 1- / if , � _ ,� , _�_, ,� - � I : � 1-1 1, I I � __ I 1 -9P / �, 3-1 / I I , i � I I ,�, - __ I 1-1 tL . i � � 1 � -, \ I � f , !15,I / :1- I I I . I - 2 � �" I; i ___ I z 1, TFRIAN. PATH , I ,_� ,; 1, \ I i 1 I';- ZL5 Zt) - 1 1 -, ,26. 1 ,�,"I I 1 4,� ,,, C11) - / �1_ ,"I'� i � , __1 I ._`1 L � 11," I - J, ; I � I r.,R A I i)� - I �p 1�� ,-'-I- I I , q , i - , , I l I / 11,�%_.7 , 1, I `� - � - , 'A I __ ,�,/ " /,-- N E W F)E D ES I � S _�,� I _��` _ / IF - �TAA t \ / /I I "I ,� ,L' IL I i N t- I 1`1 __ L U,?k - __ .��, ,,,� I -__ 17 too . - i � __ _�_11,/ I I I .01 : , - '1 � � , ,L I ,� - , I - I I - - _� ,� � I" I t � _Coip L \ / � / - . �-- I , - / , f,�44, � j � r-L __ _' I ,� ,�, , �, 04 -P I \ � � I � - I I � __ I � �_ I � / I 1 40) �- -" I I -1 , --- ,i � - - I - " ,�L � �_ -1 - , , I � - , r 11 I 1�: ", ,/ �L - _-,'-,',, I - �,-, L i -, -,z/ ��'4*-",� I : - L ;; I - I 1 4v",� - _,�, --4v",� 4_�l - - � - , I I I ki __I - -4*1 , I �'I- - i�z,�_i , A F _� : ,I I - __- " ; � , ,: ! - I r I I � � F - \�_ I __1-_--�_ �, __ 11 I,)/ , I - . "�" �� - i i i � __ �, A�C_ 5 - ,----I-- ; / I A_!�?J, I'll , . i _- . . - I I / _,,ZL "I � � ; -__- - I -1 1 ,,� , , 7 I B 4.10. '� 17�r I" Q) - - ____ ,--, � , i �� , I I I ; I Q,,, - I _� . , � - I - ,�_ � ' �-- �,� �� I I I � I 11 I � i - , I_; , ;,, !-0 -,- - - - - - " I , I I'll, o AL, �,_ _; i , , .�_ ,� I 11 : __ - b I I I : ,. - I : __ � � NMH 4.10 1 1- � �' : 2r 7 (��. " -, (�)?, � / ,,;�L:,4 � , 6" 0 t �i I � � 16,7 � , I I , /,I ; I " I /Y 7 � I\ � I " I - 26�'O I , :", -, � I 1 -1", / i 2 1_�,4� - , I I I I 1 I I \ I , . �4' ,_ � I S�P,� � \ .I -, � , I ` � // . I - I I fl, I I \ \ , L � 1 - I I I , I : 16.' 9 1: &11"I I .Z. 1>.' � - . .. - ! 4�y 1 - ,�� I -3', k � I � 11 . - - � / . I its: " I / I I . I \ � 00)�, � , i I I . V'.," " : ,/ �� r � I ; � N 1 40, �, I : _. T 460 ;��, , � L� I ,; _'i , , , � ! 6- 1 - I - - / - i, * 26.20--- \ � �f4 , r " , , _; 2 11 I 1� � I - 1 17,4 1 '' - " 2 - I ! I 1, � � 4' Ii � � - , .-ei, , - - f ;1 �, I I-I , __ I I r 1 �, - � _,�, � ,-- � V I � \\ 'L L < � 1� I I� !F- 1 A I 0.� _�- \� _�, � 4�j _ � _ _ _ _ I , , , I : ''I � - ,tl - ,r, I ; Y"� d. I __ ; I I ,, �, 1, I �� / I /r � - � ,�, I il il , ; I I - � I \\ �L -,_L � I U 1 1 1 L I S A, 11 �- I I- _L _,�:_____ I �� --S � I � � i �-4'! ,�` __ , ,�: ___ I /� _-,�, - � � , -�) Q` __ ,- � - I I - I" : _ I I . ,, f I L, ��' - , ,L � ,, ___ , I ' I - I - ; � ' \ , I J ,� ; I I 0 -�'_ - - -____ - _ , I I L I - - - - I I L � \ --- ---__ -- 00! Q'IJI: .1 L - - _ , 1 , __ I! I / I L I � --- I . I- � L __ __ ' . . I I" Q) / I I/ � I ! ,r I 1�� ! -?�;`, � tLI,-, :---_-__ 'V- - � \ -1 f i � 13�: 'IQ- � � __ __ _____ L I �If , / / � __ I - - / I I % \I ,. I I,, q I I 1 4,J , �L L ---'- � ----- "' (Do'L / L I I I L � I - � I� I- I ! I 11 " ,If / ,�',,-- e ; _ ,�',,: !_ -, I ; I � I, ; ; I ,, --- I , ,, I I I I - -- I� / I - I l� I __- , I I I 1 ;!,.I',- / - - . - , , - � .� 1, --- - 501 - __ � I "I " , .1 ' ' / I 11 ii I L I ; �� ,�-�L-� , , - , __ (� - __ - - " 11" �f � - W I I---__- - � \ I / , I � -� 11 4,li - - - -_ - - - L , ; - / --�',-, __1_ " L , i� I , 'P' �" I ! - - -, -4 - -__-- - - I Q _ __ �� LIFE CARE COMMUNITY " � ,r -"/ - Z!, �_ L-____ I I , � __ , � , "If ,�� , I --- - - / _ _ � - � I , , ' - L - _ - , _ L ,,,,, ,-, 2I - � '. I / � , \ 1�71 Q, r -1 I - , __ 1� I— I i% 0 � ____ � I -__ I- ,- I - - . _ - �, _L " _��,�� /� -_� �� ",%�, - \' " -.1 - __ I - I : I - �,_\ I - --- - - � _ I .I - � I - \ I � / - - I --- - , L -- I- ' , I , Z-'T 0) ,\ : I , I I I � L " -- - ---- I ___ - ; ,_ � I - , � . 2\11---- - ___ - __ - � I -1 - - - -__ - ; � , - L-,___- _7____,_�,�Ik - �,-,� - I I I , _ _ _ _ _.' ' ---- -__-___ �_____ I - 7k-\-__ _-' i ___L , - -, �,' I , -7�__ 1 6,-1,' �_, � , , . - ' _ , -- , - : I / 11 _ - I a N I / `- i I I - __ .... .. �_ _ � -,-- L I--- - I I \ - , -- f'�&- 41- , �Ill I L" _1_11__:17� ,_ , L'' j � __ --- __ __ , ; :�- ffl,6�� 11 -i-6-( ?-- ---� - , / PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD /_ I I _- __ � -- __ I \ - __ "k , rr � I - �-, 1� - 1z I/ ii / i � T = 25'70 ' 5 11 ,� I �- . - _1\ I- 1, I I ,- __ I I \ � - -, ! I r '_ - , - ,_ � I- � / ____1 i , � , I � I I � -, � - , __ - / I = 15-09 . .? - :1 i = 9 5 - 1� i , Q" ,�-, � L__ _� - 11 - ___ / , �"__�!'_�'�� \ �: - - �_-1 - __ I - - �_ �418. - I I _:7.- I � F , I I 1 STORY FRAME -, I � 1, . I � / ; I I A I L �i 0 1 "c:) Town of: SOUTHOLD ,__�_ " -*, ; : - � . �\�,- , ; COTTAGE 1� � �_ I- 1� I I 11�D I // I - L I / L I I I _ - 1. -1- -� , , 1� I L -1 I I - I L I ;" I I I 11 _- -- - I -7 ,:��I,�\V\��, , i ,` � I ___1 I 11--- I Suffolk County, New York I , ____ " I N, \,- , I - "` ' , 1 21�00 / __ I I 'I, -1 - - -1 , �, 51 , �,� - ,, I e , _1 -L ------- LL� / ,,, I � ` - / Ili Z. I / __ __ 0 Q, , , : I SN�y " L,-_ . , � / I - ,,,, QQ 4.09.1-i , , , I ,_ . " ! - --1 -,- __ - 7_w1___,____, - I,/ I bu ,, ,3(�, L. � FF EL�28.00 : I - ,,� - - I 11 T 3.7 � I �z , � -1 I : 2 --- ____ 1� % L I , W , � I� ' 11 19 - - I ___ __ I - I ,;E�� I I I I, ,,,,,, L , r "I .59 1 / I I Suff. Co. Tax Map: 1 25 , � 77_ __ I L I L � ,�, -C I '\ - ____ - ----__�L, ,/ --- I - ---�-: __ - �� 001�-, GN ,_ / � 1 I ,o : I / I � ,- I _�, _I� I ,, - , - , � L, I I , _� -,. __ AkA I , � , , I i. -, I C D194t Sedkfn _�_� �� - ___A_��,. I. __ -______l�___ L _�, � i: : I,� �,� ,, ; _' - -- -i� I , , 0) / 850 Lot - - ,I- __I _____ , ,- -------__ �- ,��_ 1 1 �� i -------I - - ,, -- 1 5 , , _____ ,, 7�- - / ", 1,; I . I - r I - - , � ... ____ � __ - , N 2. 4.0- - , __ - --.-- - -,--,, L , __ ,-___ ;__ / I I; PP ."? 12�, � I / ---___, - -- - , - ,�� I - " _ --------"L-___________ - , - , ''. , - 11 - __ - ! = 44 Q -.--- _, .., - - 1__ - , \ -�"I I / I i ,� I �/ - (�, : L __�i_________7:�_____ __ 'L-_, I I __ I � , ,��00 I ---1, r I I I _ __ I - Q) / - �� __ - I --- . 10011 � _ , I \ I , I . � -I ',L I I=:) _ - - __- - L___. - _ � I . - - 69 , 'L P PLAN , � ,___ -__r --_______ , _ L_ _ __ _ - 11 r I I �_@�] I;e � / S I T 1 ,�, "I- ------ I __ ___�W___: ______ _ _ _,_ ___ ____ _I " � �� t�� ;�ff�� I � _il ; , /I 'L, - __ -I _ ___ I __ . - I-------- _ _ - _ I I I I - , - _- - � � � I I I -_J_q� I � " "-L_, 1� ------ __ - - - � L� ,,�, - , : -4i � - I _ , . -- I , , S,?, -0 I / . � nq -, I I __ �r -- _ --- ___ - - __ � - - hi�� -1- - I _rrr . - . 11 I L - __ -, , , - ��r ;:� r�,-, i , -I L C : , " _ _ L. ,_ " I - - , _ (-u r , ", - - �_ (Z) I - 7� - - I )�_, Yq�, I -N!'? ,:�.-"a , ��J ! r / , __ . f' - 0 1 1 1 , :,-__ T_= 22:75 1 , L,f' � - 'I' I r I -4 1�, L Q� . ;I I - , - - J' L -I L r' Q � :,lsk I I -;�J 1\ �I , / � 4 I&r " 7�F , - ,Ic , ,N- I - ; I I, ,I ,� � --,-2, - ,�,-- is. �, 1 "" I / I (V . - . I �`�& _(z, ,N - ,.,�_ , ,�T�, ' � 5/ , 1, L / , , � . /I I - -1 �, ` : '--- � �L _�, f'P eZ�� IV I / AD I y � 'I ,_, _ ,_ '- 1-1 � 69 (1) _9�9 I -I / ,_��,�0) ,OQ �L," -_� 66" ,�� /' ,,r', , ' i, 1� VP , -- ---- , /I I __ __ , - _, , - 4y I I , _, �!�Z__, :� '8, 'V, I V L I, / I - -- __ __�, `�,"_ / I , �SW6,�',"�� 1§ , `76) - t I .. I 4 / - - ,�- ,�� I - � ; / ------ - � �-- ,: _ I r I �� I � ___ �- I- 11 - I L 4��, - -1 1`7/ --m-AAL - _L L -1 _- , I I � , 1_�_ I _-, �- , / 11) --- - 1� ; I __ - /--,/ t I I /\V/ Q:� I � -- - "I 11 I I - - - ��__ �__ 2 �� 1 _7�1 1, , � - - 1 / \ �� I 11�_ ,2 1 ': I - I - < - �_ 41, ,r' I . - 148---------- - __L ,-1-1.1 I - , - i /Ii �, �- I------ �,� , - - / / \ - __ L, �/ �-1. .I OF S-- P\/C I -, NQ8 4.07.2 1 - I -1 ef -1 - __ � / I " �If_ --- .1 - � 1> L - -, / / \\ . �� I ,_--.-- - I * 5.71 1 - . I - , I L I/ - I - I I --- I I � - , ,T_ I �, oi , I I I I / \ W L �, , -L_ 1= I - I = = �, = �, = �, � L , , , I = -, I ,:': '. 1 - -� , / \ t-- _<A "� - : I I - I I / �� - _ I / NS�H 2.05.2 " I - - 11 --I,=16:16 - ! j I I I I- - I ; . / \ I , - , - , - � , -, - - __� � � , , .. 0 1 - -__- �," -- __ __- - _� I / T = 2140 1 L , � I I . _�� , L . \ �� ,I - _� / I . I � I f r I - L, - I / , Aq- , ______ __ - ,�, � I -, I 'I Iy2VIO IL I - -1 I � I -, � 1-11 �I 9 :, , I 1 �� / / \ 1�_:_ � ,� __ , I - ' I I , " y \ . , 215 $ .- _' L- , I r �� - __-__ -- - , - , - � V \ - L: I I L / / 01 J - ___- - - __ , - __-" , , ) ,, , : "-i I __ M('P A r)-7 1 1, A \ ; : I - I -m� 1 / , 1� aq,��,,,,�,-�- , '�_ �I fr�L - I . - , I � - / , �, , ,,�,,I�- I . 7 - - I T = 2Z25 I z I 9"I Ili r�R,a-MR-ey- - ;I ,t",f I 1. I / _,,N1 , - I I - , / -.-,�--_::��ANUI-_�,` - __ - i PA)t,?,!,;,1!;1 : ll�_ ��, 11 - 7 SEE SHEET No. 3 OF 1 3 - I I ! - NjE I . , C- Q I I ;1�1 SEP. 6, 2000 `- CO 11-0 t� . NOV. 24, 1998 ��I�,__�, - - * -_ �_ AUG. 24, 1998 -1 l7,1,�: - I MAY 19, 1998 it;�_�,� ."`�, SEPT. 17, 1997 Z,",�- DATE : SEPT 4, 1997 "K I - =7=== 1 L... 614 SCALE :1" =- 40' FV � 6� I. DI I I , k I- 1_""_ " > - J"11 , , , I� ---- � I I )'� -<_�__ -- , �I , - -, ,_ � I - I 11 I - I b` 110 .71 ____ - I 11 JOB NO. :97-290 1;�,-� - _____ - - - - - . '� - SS1 I I - SHEET NO. :5 OF 13 * �_,--. 1 i� I -1 - __ ---------I-,- I-- ____ _________ ___ __ ---------- ---L- _ - _______ - I-----,---- --- -'--'L---'----------,-----,---- -_�--__,___________ ____,_ . ____ - -------ll-,---,-- . -- -----L-----------''�--___- -_--- --------.-,,---..- ---- - 1--l'�--- -, �- ---.,�,-,--".---'',--� ------ - - ------------------ -- ---- ------.---,---�----------,.------- -----, - -1 -----'--'" '------ --'-----L-----,--''L -- -" - --- --- ,---- " __,_,____ - - - -- ---- ,-- _ __ __, ._-,.-- -----.-------------�----,---------,-- _ ___________,_.__ _____ _____--------,.-----.�--------------------" -,---,- -�----------- ----,-------''-.-,------""---- '---�----''L '------"--L'-'----L------- ------ ---------"-,------- ---- ---------------,---L---------- ___ _---- - - , '- -'L--- ___,_________________ "970290-sp-1 01" OF 13 ________----,-,-,-------------,------ ---,----------'-----L"--------''---.--____ ___,---------------,�-----------------,---------,�.-----,.------.--, ,-,-------- ---- ------- --'---'-- ---- '-------L--�---" --,-,--�-.�--_____� - 5 r . r - I - - .-- - -- - - - 7----- © _ - - - - - - - I - - _ - _ I Cz uuug Young & Young, Land Surveyors LL 11» 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 �,za - - � 5= uun - 516-727-2303 .0 �& '� «,'- Alderi W. Young, P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) Howard W. Youn , Land Surve or �a c i - - Thomas C. Wol ert Pro Professional Engineer Manning t3 p f g £�nrur to John Sehnum Land Surveyor , ngineering _ Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor g 9 i «. 11 I J l 1. I Z - V^�1 . , _-G t I - i� z �2, ,w 7 - i z-i - `(c'G._ I I ' , „- -d- '- Z �'2r =.1- I �s'2t L..t I a-�, ZZ N Z Z,O=_ ZZ�4 O Q �,, '��C _«a " A 1 , - V---� . -- . .--�- � �� 14�� . - i . \ /^` , t . - I - I . . ( DL o I 0 0 C�) 0 a nn 172.29' I---- - N 65'46'1 3 UPOCKS lJ ------------ -"� I V----� O - _ - • --- • a.� ROCK 0 N 55'49'13' EO ---_- 0 C.-I) (: ' � 9 E N 64'30'21" E 163.50' 1111111, - -- --" - O •. .. -•-_ . 8153� � __ -------- --sae -------------------0... .......... T �1�� Wm` _-'' F ZONES V9 D f �_].�� l '�%1-- i a 4 /J � x 4.7 IRM�EL ) ROCKS ___ C -,-,-s-- - - _ OEZ t FIRM ZONE 0 _r "----=�==�. --- _____- - - _4= 7:71 ---- _ ---`- _ -_- -- /y�� - --� 20 - - ----- _- -- -- '- " - -----�- `-- _---_- -y ''/ ice'/ ------ �- _- _- -'------------'--� -_ '•_�-�'-i J=-. 1- -r--z- \,_ , -/ryn �f"/' --' -_ 30----- ROCKS =__-_ _----'______ _______ __- -- t=��=- Z,--�..----�. \ .,. '<�iry/�//� - - i- --- ------ 40 ----- a--= _�-+- 'y'-_' \ err/, µn ` - - '* •!r •- ��•� - - - .� .�T�..� =�.. -- - _=_ --- - - NEV1t MASO�tR ETAINI jf ham:, �% ,, .- --_ -, cr ___ _-�. =___;" - �/ \ \WA L N/•�- 1 + . i' ,!t�'.ii", /!� �� -- - �-�� +-;�' i- �• �� o;` �\ \ \ a - ' 1. 1 is t ^ ' .�% O juurt� Young & Young, Land Surveyors = 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 516-727-2303 tYUTt . 14 9 Alden W. Young, P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer �ltturting - Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor John Schnurr, Land Surveyor Txngineering �uruegiug i I Z i L o V o 0 N 65°46'13" U POCKS [] ------ O --- ., 1.y ROCK 64°30'21" E 163.50' 3, 4.6 -- - ----- -- ---- -- - 4 FIRM ZONE V9D ... _ f (EL 15)... _ ROCKS oFIRM ZONE0 ---------- ---------- _- ^- - -- _---_ _- - --,-- --- ----_- _ ---- O _ ----_- ---_===== --------------------------- ---------- 30 ---- ------ROCKS _ ------ 40 --� �N`EW- ' AS 4R ETAINI WALL W1 I TOP OF WJAt. 3 .00 NEW"' ASerN Y R G O P A R, � 46 4 �� N E W . E A M ISE G A Z E B O - - ROCKS ry F. Y \ STOR ME'' 1 STORY FRAME 1 STORY -FRAME_ \ oj�A ' / 3 06 / AGE `\ COTTAGE / COTE / - --- \ �,`u' // o FF EL=52.00 I EL-49fl_ L, a, Q O ROCKS C. /, ♦ // / i - \ I \- / O�fi Q' J F� o - i, z . 'f /f%� / •/- F - -=--- - \ ' oQ �, I� w ,-- \49. N B 1.14'1 � • Y T 40. 5 41.10Uj 36.0 Uj ' • / /' /' �� j // /r-.-._ -' . "_' '_.\ - - r C:. 1 '\_ , ,., ,prf,mwMticm9,u 1HRFb. _y_ / vr.+nX �(Oy'OF gip%PVC r_ a r Uj 10, y i z \` N / MH 1.130 � - NSMH 1 / E / < 20. / N I E '0 T - I �(� 47 YY' / \ it .75 °1 t "2 - T 4 z �' 8.30 - war 1 3 \, I / '/ 3. I 5 ' 5:16 / v -<l I 4 3 .71 A '�'• . WA r r � 5• r - / 'yW v { - - - -may / • / � \ -: ,�,�" _ � TOP G •;. O 4 `�° ,vim - 6 • r / 1 - / � \ - r /_ S a - t , o / r - - o o O a - - 1' / \ / - i \ yr r - Y s J O � Ez- y' OU ' - \ -r _ _ r _ — ` , / - v / ° O 3 ;25 LIFE CARE qY 32.25 ' ,. \ 1\,I _ / --Y`-`- - � ,,K-' / / ,• ..�' / - r , - , �,� , ;' � / _. � 32.05 �' � / r a — •_QSc- P - � R 1 E _ ��:• CONI o � LANDINGAT� X / f S fi f / \x 0 r - I ° 2 GREENPORT 31.6 , 1 Town of: SOUTHOLD 4 E W f /j/ 41. ' I - I 32. / - � Suffolk- ufl ok _ County,/- � New York Y / I �/ /z_ , .i .•-•, / - ., :; \ -a NSMH :1' z z / / / � � / Tax Map: 1000 3 5 1 25 p v , \ % r+----31.48 Distract Section Block Lot / 35 ---------- 35 I 1 E PLAN L ` NEV-PED-ESTRIAN PATH. i ._. ---- _- .• /-,- - / _ v r .. - / 1 f 8 \ - Q fy. - I _ r 1 - - - / EW N - SMH 1.1 _ w 8.0 I - Q' 7 - _ - 00 1\ 2 _. -- I ,o - - `-- `- - '` ' _._ / � 1' = 30.94 i � o � �" ter_ 1 / 1 / / \ / \ !\ f / / � ,. 'f 26.00 \ i \ \• .\ \ �� ' 1 V A .A• .A \ 1 �� 5r f SEE SHEET No. 4 OF 13 SF©LANDSv ' NEU�y WC) CID NOV. 24, 1998 n Z AUG. 24, 1998 C? MAY 19, 1998 1� SEPT. 17, 1997 Ss�o SCALE :1' = 40' DATE : SEPT. 4, 1997 JOB NO. :97-290 =_ SHEET NO. :6 OF 13 O ____- i -..--_-- _-.__.__--_ - -__.-____-_-____-_ O F V 4 . Young & Young, Land Surveyors � - 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 - -,-,EL . . . 516-727-2303 �5`. . aW . _ - - - €-a ' «4 - - Alden W. Young, P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) =�`_S . Howard W. Yoursg. Land Surveyor . - - Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor . John Sehnurr, Land Surveyor 0 B O o ` . 0 0 -,�• . a -, o j o a - o - ' ` ° D .�,' , --' - ,." - , o -�;z ' - ';�o / - // .''r / , / "%,�-/ -/�ice- ,/� -/ ' ,-� // ///- -/ // / -4,-, �J . ,/ / /, r/r/, / 45-- / / r'-� /- /i''// r-p // "� ��'-v\ • / ,/:• ,' //,.(7 ,/,/ ,/',j%-/moi/�!/-; ,i�`,/ '! ,!i rr `\ j ,,I III / / - // / / r / / vJ ,` Q / ,.O , / / - / /-/ // / - / - / / -- 1 J / 'I/' `,:13,1 I / w''E a F y O / r' ,/ ,'''�' " / /'i% I 1: - ,�, - ---l- -_1 � - - , - I-,I 1.-11 IN,, 111.1 �I-- ,-,,- �, , 11 � . I'll, " , ,- ", _1_ -,�-,�",, ,;�',��1,��,I,5,.�",,�V-,��,,�,�,�, " , � , -- --",v,I � �,�,,�_�,��,,,�-��,,,;�`�_�,' ,,x `� ;,��j t,,! � --, �,,, �I"I 11.V,"�.-,,,�-,- �*,,:,�_-"'; �,'_,�- � ; � , � `�-'-,�� ,��I,:,��,L"',�1�,�,-�,,�,,,,,�,� -, 11 - -I 11 - - _�,,-,,_ ��",,,,,�, , , , " , , ", , . - , i-11�._ ,`� , I ,", I - , , ,-; - - --, i --?",t,vr-! �-, � '. " Iff _ -6 '-i",-.�-' 1� ---,:-,r,-7--,�-4,,,- "'A' , ,., - " ` I � , ,r � - , --�-*`,,�� f�7-7-1,,,,P',,,,' 7- _ ,� �,ii,t--.', - �_, -1 -.7', � �!;',7 �� I -��r�r I I I ,,._��,�7,7 __:�w`t�1171�1_ 111", �1.I 711P 50��,:,. 1 ,- "i�7"O �-,- """ ,- ",, " — - 7,_ ,,,�-- 'zi- '. , -, , , ., ;3� -, . - '��,: ��:I I'.�,�,, 1�,;��,'�,,��7 7, , , -,"I - "I '� ��,,t�!t!'� or , , : 1� ,,�t 4",7", 11, , --",,, - , -, , , - _- __1'",,il---,�_, -1 111_11","0�1,"",�_ _11", I 4' '11 I I I _�- '�411__Iv- _ - , " �* '� �,, i��" -" '� �, , � ,4, ,�'i�� 11 , �-7�,,',�g,��,�,,,-�z,,�-�-,�,,,,,�,,,,�,,,,,�,,,, - ' *, , , "- .11 -��,,�-��ll.�,�;_��,,�.��,��-,�,,� �,"zl _4�111,I 1�& "I � �, ��.�;�:,�-��'.fl�- , — "I - 7�rr,- r - � 7-�w�� ,� �! �'11,4"_1 �;��, _ � � _,�, �v�t, '"T 5, t,� � _1 7 � , ��--� - " 4 '*" �-A�- -H.r*�� - '' , ,� "I'Iil��,`- A,� "'a I , � � -I _7� _111�`� -7�1� 4��7�, ,7-�k4,-*�'.t�4��-,-�-_',-"�_11`1� _,,,� q, ., , I - � - - �" � I I I I ,, I 1�!�,T�11� _,��`_ , _1 ,-,,� �r -5 I - I , 7-7`o�- �-,Vr-m,��--- - ,tz, �,�-,nt ".*�� - - I I , - _ .." ''. �,t'l 'c,' !,!!`,V"��t� �,�"", , , , , " - I I � I I . I I� - �11 - I � 1. " ,�, , ,� : , �. - , .r , , , � I I � I . 11 I I � � . I I � I I I I - I . I I �. I - " I � - .1 I 1 .7"P 11 0,t�I , - s-, " , I�,, ,,�,47,� � , "I ,�� 1 �14 1, � I I I I 11 I X," I I I I I .. _....__ I .--....-. . —_ I � I __ __ � - @) — E , ��17"i , �� ,-�i--,:�, Young & Young, Land Surveyors �_ �� .11 � � ��,:, �:,_, 1 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 :-I S�� -0 �j�5,_ � I *.R,t. 516-727-2303 ��1, � ': � -_,;E Q� � " ,.�-1, �� ` ��',�-, u,� Alden W. Young, P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) ��__Ls ��,� Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor �,iz�,�, wol. �� VL Thomas C. ,rt, Professional Engineer Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor John Schnurr, Land Surveyor 0 1 � I . . . . . 6 ... � . 0 ... I . . . . . . . . I '.. �" , . . . 0 ... . I . I . . . I . I � 0 0 ,.. , , . I . � . � 0 11,�.".. �, 1,,,. '_ --, I" .. _,.,�_ 0 -,-.,** I - -, .. , . (:� , .. " . Q ,� *.. �r I ," 1�, ci OD ..�A. -- ,��,,,'\ . � ,� 0 0 ___ " -5,--,-- .. ��, ,,, , .11 0 1 , 7� --, �,` () - - ,-�,,-, "T � , ,-, / I � . � , .. _� --�_- - , , ... ',�_ __ , �, ��,-""',- D �, �'_�--_:-�,�-,-- -- 0 1��_, ",��,,,.,,,,Iz � . � I 1, "-,,- , �- - ,-""-, , _. "(-r,- , ,�", I �50 � . I , , , , �,,�,��,,, - � " . � - � _� - �, �""� " _e �, �, . I - ,�, . � � I ',�� " �.. I/ I 1111-e ,-,-�-` -,-,-,�"--;�� 0 0 1 / ,,,- ,-",- , "- _"40 1,... " / ---, �,,,', , � -�,��, I 1 11 I �;1� I - �,._', 1, 11 - , , I -, I , ",;;,,, � , 11 , "_/ 1'�" I 11 -�,-�,-� " � - ", � 11 ,�\ , . / � / .-, � ;;,�11�, N- I, .. / / l ,,,;;-,-�"�-, , , * / / / / � �,o,,��,l�,� ,�-- ,� ,�,//,� , - .. I ,_ / "', , , �� I - � �p ,z . I / // / ,�"," l"� �,l� , , ,: , �,� .. I/ I I /,////"/,1,"-.�� ,,.! - I z,Zll� i 0 . /, I / , " "I � , / I I I _� / "//�,"""",-," ,��," 1� 1, I -_ // I I", ,, I .1 / �/ " I-4�_ 0 //.. .1 471 1//,/1,I l` -.1 , " � / I � , I, / I / / I 0 ,, ,C) 0�� , / //,///"/I�,,- � � ** I I ,//I'I, ,�1.� " / f '�. I�� ___ 0 ... ,"I ,�,-1 I I I/11 / , I "I ", " , - . , - , / `///�//, �, \ __ . , . � -, / / , ,�//��,��,," / \ ___ O�90 , .. --, �, I""I , / � ,�/ e I 1�� __ __�_ , . , ��' / � - I �, . 0 _�- _�� .,"" / ''I /14,�I,, ,-, �,-- -- 45- � ", �, / I - " --- I . �_ _�, 0 / I /4/ "/ '0� ,� , 11___� _,� ,�� ... _�� ,-'1_1 N / / , " - _;,� � , � ,, / / ,��/"/ � /' �11_`_'�-,.-, I - � � / /,/, /// ,� /, - ----�� , . ,�" / / I I//�/ �.� "I .. �,_--:,,��,��,�--,-�,,�," / 11�, / . ,/:-,-/--- ��-,,,\ 41,i C �l.., " --.1 , I �" �� C) / I I � / 0 /,---`�,-__:I'___- ---- � , . " " IV // � �/-_-,- - z/ , " ,� \ \ , � -- -, -, -,,,,,,,,, � I . �,,;, , I/ / _�_ / - I � 11 � .. ,, l " / / I � __ ____ ,_�, �I , ""�",.�,, /t" - N, ; -___� 11 .. I 1,/ / ,�, �' -' ' ' ' '(3 I,/ I,/ \ , " 1� � . � , " " .,,,'' -13 / 111 \ f 11 � � I ,)� �� I/ ""� ,,�, ,zl�,/ / -/, e.1 \ : /' i� i -- .. ''_ / z , , , :11 I _� � " / 1-1/ N ", I I I -. ,--."O", , / , ,-�"',,,"�-,-,-�-�'.' (.Z" / -,", i � 1_1� � �� ,. 1, .. I ",'/ " ,, ,� , , z �,ell�� I / , , /' ,11 / - , , I , � , , �,�_ , ��', , ,� I �) � i !1; I_� �' I l /-,(-/ -, , I ; �' I I I �t w, I " , - / � il / I li�`; I " " __1' I . �,/ , I I I "x,,,,� " � " - // I � I I �, I I -, , -` , ," - . I , � ��, , :_1 ,��j /� ... /,_"-/'�,", "",' - � �',,,�-` .1 / - ,� � / , _� ,��- I . � � .-� ,`,,,,,-�-- ,� "I, I_ / I 0 C) �, � / . -L . - , I I I ; � _�' 42,R m � � .. '0 - - ,�,,,��, I ,�� ,�,' ,,,, -, " ,;� , / I I / I -1 - I , -,,,-,,, " - -) I I � : � , ,�,�, I , -��-;,-,, , " � ,-,',',,'��,,", ,-,-�-�, ,/ /� , � I� ; / �I .. I -- , x ` I � ��,:_o� i / , ,�,_ ,,,�,�, ,',�,,,,,"", "I ,�11 � 11 �,_,_ //� I - � '�, 1z �: " .. / �-; ., , z, I - I I : I , . , � -;;�,�, , -,,-,,,,�`- ".""�,�,,, ,�,-'��',, , ,�_� ��, � I 1�1 "4`� () ,_ .1 ,� , ,� " ,,, e , , ,- --- .�$t'� ) / , / % I " !'�= - , . l , , , , " � 1, ��,, ,�,,- , " , � , � ' ' I I - � 3�2_ (D . 1_�Ie , �, , �� ,,,, I �_ I I � , � � '.1�, / ,'�',, " z,- ,-�, , , , , I ',� % I 11 I Iz I . I I / * , / / I � / / ��,L�, �,-.- � I _11 , ,", , / , � -,, ,,,,�-,,1��"/ - ,/ , 11 11 � ,�"x. �, , � " / �, 0 1 . " , _'. / I I �, ;,,<,"" , , , � // / ,� Y '�l 7 11 '' I 11 � ...�' - .'O � � / � , � � . - _/ , �-,,, -, " `�, -, "I � ,,� 9 L! "'t� . " � � , , �- � - ,� , ____ I � " I -�� - . , , ,, / ! I,/ ,� �� " I� I � .� ,�-�,,- , .1 -, " .� � ., � / � : � � ".. ��1, �D,,, - / I � 11 I I,I I . � I I I';;;- � � / L � /I .i F ,4�-, A. -I / I 11 I "� , , I-- I , y I " � I I - ':,� I I � / I I I I 11� I ,.�- .� , , -. / ,/./ I � � " 1Y � � ,/ � , I�� __, , � I 11, "., , j,��I "I 1 � I - ,, �� / ��,� I'll ..,. I" ��", / I I 11/ ,,��'-" ,�,,� � 1001- I 11 ,/1, '�K_� " �I 1'�1/1 I-,--, I , I I, �,11 11 c� () - : .� I " // , 11 - -, ----- - , � / I 1, ,I .� ,-,, ,I/ /N\ 1 6�,�I 1 4 , / 11 El 1:1 ..� ,-.', / 11 11,� ,-,- , , 1, ,, ,,,o� , I - �_ �� ' / /� , . . � -1 / I - , , 11 ", I I- ,� �� / , " 11 I I I �j�_I I - 1_' z // / ,- ", ,-" ., , " � ��,I I I I � �, I �,I \ � �=�I ..;/ l � ,/ " , ", , � ,,,, I , I � �L / ,I cl \ I 1�, - .- ...,� I ,-'r-1 / I"/ �,, l,�,e I,,,"', �- , I I -- . "�, _� �� 1 / / i, \ , _�,1, ,� " �Vl () . , l _C- / /.1 .11 -1;,.1,, I I, I, ,I I �� ,__ 1, Z �,- � 1 , I V, "I �I� ; , � / 7 1� . , ,I I / , , ,;e , , I " � � '�,, 0 \, A-1,I .. �, _4'7x / '.1 , I ,� I ��, " , , ,� I 11 I \ v / I -I 0 , � ,� , _� / 11 " 11 � -1 "I ,,' �_ �I -1 , ,_ I / " / , I � 0 , 1, / , - � ,,, 4 S.; � � 11 / " , �, 0. / , \ I ", p,��,: 11 .. � I -CIV / "�/ "" , I X--' "I �1. / "� , � �, I/ I .11 � " I.,��" .. ,�', ,� ,�', / / ., "� I 7 /I /I �," _�_ ), � / C� --/_(__1', /Y\ \1. 1, "I, t I 6�.� , I I / �" � / � . , _�� 11 1� .1 " I ''/� , " "I � / f � ') � �j,,�� , � ," _;i� le / .� � .I ,� 11 " / 1 I _� I �� / 1 , 1, . 1. .� - I ,�L,�� o .. ,�- , / 11 11 " I I/ / �'i . / / I ,� I � ), /�� - , \, , 170 �.�. "- \ �9 1 1 � " _;� 1 / " , I I- I \ 1, v�D�l - / 11 � , I � , , I .,.1 IZ7� lo, X/ .," "I,�1, , �",X �I /11 I / I ,/ ��i" , -�1� \ \ "_� I " " � I / � 1 � I cn , �zj v . C " \ . . , " , � , 11 ,__� , \, -S��;I ,� / / " -, �, , , I. ,� � � , /11 I - .. " , -�` " / " / , ,�,, � � " I / / , I ; � I ID I I., \ "\ �P=� -� � �' , "CV,i ,� I � I , -_-, -I � , _� / 11 .1 � , / - \ . � ... , __� le " 11 "le z , , �� I - ,, , / 11 � �; , I , � \ ""1�� " " � / I / I 11 'i - -" I I / / I -I --P , , ,�- I I 1,-1-_- -_ I / I I I 11,� - - , �/ ; L -,I \\ I 1,�,',, t_� "I - / / 11 I I I I i I . � /01 I i . 11 �, 4sz, ,., I _�-�,, ., / /,., 11 �, ,"__� ___.- / Ir . � .. , _� �le I 1 I 1� I I 11 i \ E�] j� - " _11 I 1�_I - - .1 i � , , � � � 1. �I 1�__ - � ,, , , / , .; " C)./, , : .�,, ,� 1-1 " . I 11 11 11 � �- .1� �, 1� � "� I 1, 11 " �. " .1 -"," .11 "11 .1/ �,I I �,� // ,,- __1 ,�I .,_"_�'11 ,� I I ,I 1�1� i I '_ �11-- ,,�A� (-\, I - ,I , ".4. " _-,�, "/ 11 `* I ,, / I I - I / j i I / ,.� I -11 �I-� /A� �', (I � I � � I 0 _- ; , I 1�� 1,. I --. " / 11 .1, '1�1 � ,�1 I I I � - - � I o � I _��--, �. . " / ', , " i / i I lo') , -,�� / -1 (:) ; �_� , �, I I. ,I I � __1 I f- L '1�1 ; � � 11 11 I/ , �_ : 1, / I ,NID �.'* .1, / 11 11 .� " // , / ",.�, I I / ; / I --�� ,rn ! 1 /�,I � �, , , I I " , , -, - ", - _1 I / 11 .11 " � ", " ,, I ,I I / " 4�1� 11 ,� � ; ," -� � " /I _�,. I .� .11 11 .� 1, / , � I , , I i c / � __1'! . 1 1 ,�j �� ,' ,;:,..�. / __�' " // .11 11 ,,1 I / "I I i- I/ , � I I I " I �_ � ;� � / 1 � / ,/ I I � \\- ��-* ,/ 1-1 11 11 0 1 ' I � I i- : , / / ".� . I I "' 4,1' -1 . I I I I ; .5_ � I I � I (-. I - " I- " 11 / le .� "�,I 1 I 1\ I - � I / I � ,.-", .., / e ,/ , ' EWD-FRAME ! GAZEBO � ' ,' � /- � � I . ,� _r " / /.1 \ \ __ V , , / i ) I �, _�� -i "7,1 ,' . ,. I : I I --_� , I ... "I � "_� , // ""/ / / �;��,1_�_--- " ,� \ I_- , I � � � I x 1.` I I _r I-,I I� I/ .� 11/ � I 1, \ '_ %�,� -_ 11 - / I I ,z 1 // - � � ,_ " ) I ,/ I . �I I, 11 // ��,, �,_,,,,�--- --I " - , / (z x I , ; I . � 11 / / , "' - -_-, 1)�_ I / " "I., ,I _1 -, "11 /11 .� / ",_;,�.'1, I'_ - ___�, - - / Z' �: � I / ,� � � �\ I 11 I � I * _' " � "/ / , ., �_ �,� -- � , " I / ,/ � , , I , , _-�11 -- � I I - . , _� , 1.I.. I_ ".1 / / . 1, � / : , , I � �� i � I � " , I I / I I . I 1\ � ----1 --, % I � 11 \ ,� �) - -z � X I I , iQ i i I -1 I 11 I \ \ - ... ..... , . / / , ,� I I .. - �11 � � .1 / / ..., ,I - I � / - 11. , 11 / I, I / i I I " \ ,1 . 11 " I � , 11 11 : - - � � , 4 9 � % " I I 1 _�,> . - I ,_1 � 11 11 " .�11 / ._11 . � I I',, I / I 1 -_ �, - 0 "- -� ,/ / I , I ( -_ I x % I � ,' /" I � �j6 () I - '' ,." I''I 11 11 11 o� \ " �, ;� I 11 � z ___ ,� / I I : � __�_ ., � / , , 1 5 ROCKS "I ".".,., , _�;,."I, ", -".1 ,-'e., /;;, : -- - - \�.� \� ,,, / � I �� I 11 - 4-7 -----_ , / I I i , 11 -1 !, I , 11 1. � . % / / / � 1'� "I -1 �I .11 ,�-, � � 11 0;�' __� \ \ ,\___� ! I k '/ I_,;;� -� � / " I ---------- � I , . , I -�- � � .� I \ . I I � -,- I 1, , I -- ___� C....') . 0 1" �.`.�. _,�"�,�" ." ,.,, ,"11 Ill/ 1-7- ---- "I '_��,"I- I/'! �I I� 1,\ 1,"I ,1,,�- �, I I f � I/ ,,�-_- -I, " 0 __ - ,-1 � , - \ � 1�� 0 / � -40 � 0 ' '� I.!,! I--, � "I .1 11., 11-1 � � \ I� ---. �� ,-_1',�-_1__- � /I 1'� V. ( 11 1 � .-�� - 1� � -3�� 1 - " ,� -1-1 1,, , ,,.e �", .11, 4 11 I 9 x ____ �\ \ ,1, I. . ,--- ,, / I/ I I, 1. i I il / , -_11., ",\ ? 0 �:�...-�," , , � " � ,� \" I " / 1 ; %, , ;. ,�9� I �, ,_Ir�-- �" ., ___ 1, \�, , I ; - 11 I I � . / : (I " - - � ,., ".1 I.." -, I � ----1, � - _ 1\ / �, / � I \ � � e 0 1 1 . . - -.� I" ", , ., � I __ \� I� ___ , I I I � � I N I". , <::::::: (:�) �)b ." I I,� ,-,( I , �� ,� 'Ile � I -_ �� I _____ -,_1 1 / i � � 4,'D.9 _,,, ` I -11_�11- '.1 ,� � ��, -` I "_____, I I 11 -----_ - -_- -- ,/ / � i !�, 0, -I- .�,� -, -1 I I ,� 11 11 /I I \ .", � � / . 7�� ; 1--, -, ---, � I " " 1 �, ,I , 4 2' - -I I . � i (��; �, I .,�1, -I , ,<�� I ,� \ / I / � / I � / � ::w� 11 11-1_ - ., - � \ z I ---, / I I : I �- .�,� "I , I ; , ,�, I I I N I , � �, -1 0 __ -I - ,�., �11 , , / " I , -_ - -_ : V / f I ,_,� " 5> � - �, 11 1�11, , �_/ \ �1� I-11� i I - / I ,� \ � / 11 0- ::�ROCKS? � -11, " - , ,--**' I / ; i ,i� \ -11 _�� , -1 - ,� ,� I,� , '/ /_ .--,- \ , I �� , / t il - _ .,� , ��'1:7�1 , , , ,1�1_'-, -- --1� /,, / / �, \ - ____ ; / I � i �1 // �% \1� ../ /� � - I ." \ � I \ . - _-- �,�c-�7 , � �� , - 1,__ , � I \ z __ - � �/ I I � � ; \ �_ -I' /�- �_- � � , , , / � \ -_ , �r - I I I -- - I - . - - ,� ,� � I , I �p , \ ____ I - - , " � -- / -1 _.- - � " ", -, �_ �' / �, -1 6 1 \ -_ ---- -_ I I -1 I / � I I- ;-.I. __ -" � � Ile , I ,� " ,� I - _4_�� ,_ , / I I � , I I - ",I __ -o_.. �0_- __ I " " , �111".- - I / \ - __,� , I "- _-_ \ ,,---' � \", I ,// � / 'I I, �_�;'-. - -,�- - - ,� ,I ,- ��.��o I I ,� I'll: ,I I / I � I _ _-,---------- "11 \ ,� I '_ \ � / , __ - I - �, - , I I I \ I I �_ � I ��, � / __.. __ ___ _�_-- -- ,__ I- "I I I \ " 1�� i �_ I , 1 �/ I 9 __ -,11.. __ d_( � -, / ", __ _� ,__1.-I- _rr� 11-- ,�� ,� "I ,,�---_�� "11 I I/` "I ,,"I-"1� _11, \ \\ / -, �- __ x 1,%, // 38.7 , I , � , "'o ";,�- -_ -_ - / __ __ '..".-I __ -11-1-,'-(, ",-- _', "I "� -I- � I I I / \ 11 ' \\ // '�___/ -- L,- --- // I� ,7" 1\ /I� I� I 0 - __ -� - -_ �� I , �:�,,;_---- - -_- I -_ / � 11 __ .�,._� - � ,- I , -� �I� � ;."-- � � / �,� �," \' \ / / A I I - \ / I 11 ,� 'I,/ ___ - --- - , -\O , .-- � - // I '�e,"�'� '1� / - 1 � � , � ` - ...� - - , , 'Z I x, z!1, -\ / � __ __ !,�,._?- "1- 1 - - �I -- ,�11 __��e,__ : I / , / "" ____1 --- � / I I \ � 11� \\ /11 I I/ ;1// 1'�_, -_ ...,..- -1 -, �- - ,_, , "I ,�_,- _--�_- I I/ X -1 / " "I, .I-,' ,I I ,- -,,, / \ I . "I / �� " - ,I 1�_ __ ..---"' ---" �-I'— � I ",- �I TO -,� - 1\ / .� I I l" / // I �,�, ., "\ �,1, --,--.-� -I—-1�I ��1 "." �I // I \.r�_� I \ /,\ �I.,/.11 ,, / .... � -1 ,- -, ,I - -- _1'1� , I � / I 1, I � .�\ � � \ I()q- _- -�- -- - 7,2 _1 � - , ,-5 5 ---_��; I / I , � , , I / 11 I \ / , ,,, i / , I � - __ - � � , I 11 , __- - , - � / ./ I I "�, � , / r \ � � \, , I I 0 ,6-5-5 -, "I -,- _-_�,,� I / ,, z I I I �� i 1, / L' 1 '�� __ �, * --- 0 x _(, " _ �1_ �, I ,Jrj 1�__-,,�--'- ,.,/ -.4 / / I/ � �_, " / \ ,--, / \ � �. ; I �, 1 7 " - �- , _�_,: -- - I , -, ." k,,,., . I , _11� ; ---- 1� 11 ��_ .--�,--�--:------ I_r(-r '_---- _"_ ,_ __ 0 �,-I -11 ,/ " i I I I I // 11 I I I I I , --_---_-_ / "7 1� \ I 1,11�,, I�11, I ,,/ ...- - .�- - -� - ,_ ,__ , N-- --�--,,, , / I I I / � I -, \\ 4-17 \ i� 1. " "I- / �� .. � -- __1 , ---� -,., . I I I . � I -- - - I - , '1� I I I _� . - ,-- -- - -- , , .�� /� I // /� I I I--,' 1, 17'1-11 1z 1 /,� �I x I. �� I I 1,, ,<"�, , �. I __ , - 1-4_r�I' ,�' I , -, - - , I I " I 1; I I -, � � \� / - -,- � , , - -- - I ,.,� � / / , 11 I x 38�6 1 -I 1�, \\\ -� *, � I_ , - / ,I- C __ -*"-* - - ---I--I- , ____1 - -_��,,_..,�, - I I /I -11, I, \,1, %�_" ,�/ �\1 ,I/ -1;��, / __� 4- -- __ ___ I I,� - I /I ,I - , I � I 1� ,, �, / �. ,/ . ,>/___ --- *-- -- __ 4 1 -:�,11 I-1�_ , ,", I / �, I I � I �, ,--:�:_.,p � , D *, -I -, ---' , , ", - " I , - / ,� / I --- � I � /I "/, L , - - - I I, -- I - ,- - " I ,� -_- I I / 0 ROCKS � .....--,� -__ -I'_ - - ,-�-,�-,- , .;- I,� �_ , ,I / / I I ,� �,I . ,11 1, � I / ", / � / " _<�, _. _0__._x � '__��5`_ __ - -:� -- -- --.,- , �, 1,� I / / � __,� I ,- " I I -- 40 — _,,- " , " ��' .- ,214-2B -- _�_-- ,_ I - - I ---- , � ,�_�� I ` � " I // "I, I I / � I I , �� - , � " z � , I - r'� - 1� - � �__----�;, - -I- -- _____ -1 __ ,--- - �,�'_', / - - � I I - I I � / I/ / . � - - I ,l �,I I�' / I - I I - - " __ -I � " I 000 ---.;---- ___ - �,,�,,�-. - -, - .,- _<-----.;;�,--, � � // / 11 1-1," � " � x ,,71 1� " ___ - , '� , , / - , - ___ .. _�_, -,-- _ ____ ___ ___ - ,'��- I 4,- � �11 I I " / / 1, �� I 1, . - - ____ - � - I "I- __ ... G ____ - _<- --,- ''-, - �- � ,/ / - -- , - -- // "� I'��i!iiiilli!!!!! - - 1, , ��, -�� - ,� - � __ - -104 __ - - ___ ___ __ _;�', " " - I I, I " I / / x -11, - -_ " --_- -_.- I- , _� - / �� _1,1� -- -_ __�_ -- - -_ . _�._ - ,I I - Z / / I I I -_. - _,��-_ -,� l-_ \ I --_- __ � I i / , it ......l��!!��li!!!'',��!li!!illl - ..., �- _>1 , � / , - so,2 E.........� I_--,--,-- _ / 1 -,-----, 11 5535 ... __--...--*V\ik0 ____ _f - __ I - I I " �, / - -_ _ , 1-1 I " , I � -_---,,, ___ - _� t�,L o/,-" / z 3 I'----'- - . - -,-,--, ____ 11 - - - __ - - -_� -1 I-;__ ; - __ I z , , _4 / / 38.5 //, _" I I"" I -1 � I , _,__-, � ]-_.-.,-... ,, _,��, - - __ - - ,-- ___-1-1 .�.,I ,- -_- / , / , " \1 1, ,� � -- __ - /, , �1� �A _-.... ....' ,------- -, - - ___ __ - I - , _4e // / I- _-_ \I 1, " -,- - ; , //" - 0 ,- -,, , I - I I,1,� ____ I I __ � -�� I: I -- - - I .1 , 1__i�� _',___�,_.. . � __ - I - - - __ - ,- I - , I z/ I I / /I ,� �1�� -, -, . - - A I # 0. � 4.7 . ... __, , --,-,-- __ ___-__ ___ - ___ � - -�� I - -- / , I�- cle�_ / _1� ",_ -___,�" -,- " - I / /, "\.\-, - I I I -_ -_I � I.1 I ,�,� - 1 4 v� - I , � _ -.--_------ - I - .*----- �� --- - __ -- _;;;�_',-- �,-, -________- . �, / , , -- 1. �. I I 11 / � N� - , _ , � ____ I .:`��........ .. � _____ - .:;-.�� _, , __ " "-, I , , .1 , - I D , 1111> -___-I ,- _�-, -_ - - -----,;;� - ,� . � , , " . , _ I ., I ,// r \ - - --/ - - __ - -... _ _ ,_�-' _-_ --- - - -- - /,/ 7/ .,..� , / \ I .1 I " , � "" � �, �< ,-__- I -1 - - -,�_-- z "-, - I �� :. . \ - ____. '. I ,_-�--'I - - -5 I- .. -___ .. -,-, ----- _______ _________ ____ - --, � I ,/ I., " I , I I � 1 " , � i I/ . , �� . � I I . r-� _� I " , � , _ _ I _111 __ , \ \ " ,55. __ - __ -, -� I, I/ , I . , _� I I : I .11�� __ ... - .-, .. '_'I_5___ _____ - ___-,-_::---7:._ - " / / i I I I "I / 1, 1, - . __- .. o�-- -- __' __ ____ --1, I " �I I I ,- I- I � x s�7.9 - \\% ______ I 11 �� I // I I � -__ , __-, . -, -, _____ - __ :�::�,-_v- -_-- - I x - I l / "Irl, 2/ / I , - -_ , - � I- D — � I .. ______ � (I- ------------ ___ - __ x 1-4.1 --- -1 � , / I " I .I �� I 0 _-� 1.� (D ** _____ - - I , � 11 .-�� I lq�c I I 'l � I- I/ - _ 0 - -1 �..__,__, - -1-1 -__ ____ . _____ - I .11 ,,�� ! 1 / /11 --- ,\� \, 1 1, ,� / ___ -_ I __ . - (_'7 I:,- ,-�_ - ___ I I I , I L. I ___1 .._--I -7--731�-81, I -_ '! 1 � " � I I �,- --- -�)i,_ " 1�_ . _- , . I , I �� _ - I �K (5> -0--k -- I : : I - C ----,-,r---,-- ,__,� " 1/�� / // !�T; A 0 0 1 __ , 4.9 __ . _,� !_'�-- - __ - ____ ___ _____ \ �_ 1�", .�_ , ,I " ,�_, i I ------- .1 �__ --- � I/ � , , , , / , , I I I ', - _w I I - I , - - / I I I I - ._� - - - _ - __ "I / / -_ I - I / I / � 1-1 -__ _ � '.5�_,�,_� --, ---- - t-__ - - I I - ,� I " -1, � --- ___-�I I � __7 -_ , "(' , I I Ii. ___- _ C ---__� . - -- .I- __�5!57:� ,:r _��. _. - I I,I� - ___ 11 ;--_�, --- 11 � " - � I __ I/ '/ .� ; � � " - _.- . �,- --_-.;,1!,7 .- - ____ --.---- - , --- % < \ ; I _ 4�)' ___.* _�55��-JF��_;;� --��7z��_ �;__�--.;:: -- - - � -_ -_ _A1 � I I % I I I <�NI 91 , -- � --/ - - . - ,,'7 - __ - I I -__--, _____ - >�, 1_1 I 1__� 1.1 4 ,I � ,\ I /I _� ,"i - ! � 1, , ,� - " , - - , _ii� 1. , , _ /. "'�, � , , - - I - - - - ____ �_ __ , I I __ ___ ;1__ /I � - \ - , - \" � / / --- � � �, -- .. , - _ I ; � " \ (;K / I , � i znu; - , - -4 ,;7��-'-,;-_ , ,::� - - - , I .- I � __ � I I " -Irb / , � I � I = , , 0 D , ";r-_�7 , _-�_- , __ � / 40 , / I \ � .d -, , ,,,;. - � I � -_ \14 _� i- ".-/ ,. -,-- - ��,e , I I -1 1�___ - I / I .. , �,�__�,;;;_,�,��_�_; ,____/__ :::�- I ----:, 44.5 - I : I � / 1, \ \ .0 , , 31E - - -- I � . 1�1_- "I"� , , - f i I 11 % I _- x I � �, / 1 I -11 "I ) ,, i I � 0 / ,-, // . i , I , , 4 " / " , * ,/ . , . I I I - I 11 � - �\ 1, z - I � -1 r,1 54.4 $ .(!�2� -,. I - I i I I" 46 I 11 ',��, / __--------___�____ ,j- , I 11 - i � / - - : i . - ** I . . " _y \T , � I _-_ ______ I / I \ I .I , , \, , ,�'D I ( I I � E - - -, __�,/� . \ , r_-.Im_ I , % I \ __- _�>_ � 1�' ��` � 7 - r- - - - ., � � .e ,-_�, - � I � \ i � " � , -_ I - / _- i, � I , I 1 �<2�5 FIRM _ . - .T- . - - \..-, , � � I � __ __ "I � --_ -_ e___� -/ _�- , ! ,-, � �, �, N , I/ / .; , I � 1 � 1� � I� -,- __�� ;. ...... , / . I 1, - I \ I--1 11 " __ - -.--- _-t_� ,, " __ � I � I \, ,', � I I �\ �, . 11 / " / � i � - (EL 15) .. 1, \ � I � I I I I I K ltr I� - . 1 � - � . , \� - // I � 1 -7 p� .........� I � � , I \ I I \ , , I \ 1� 1,_� -- , / i� I \: ; , RNME , 0 � " I I I � - __� .4-..,... ........... . _ _ .1�I . \ 11 I \ \ \ \ � \ - i _� __ 1, --- I I \ 1� // ,� I - ___ , , , SVR,( F, , ! ! � , -� ,��, /I / - I � i 30� - - - - 7 , . ------ ,� \ I I \ - , "/ 1 -,�� 11 i -�� - � � . . _ �:��.�- I- -, "I : I I / --- _� -;------ / l,�', ! I i I �I /, / �_ ; � ,,, E ." , � I �8. ,� I ., \ ' ' , \ N � __ ,, / i I AvL�>r f- I I - I I 0 gl.� *. � _______� ; ,,1_1 I �-o � � " I I - _. ,� _ �- � .. -14-1-1 , � ' ' I I , -,"_ � : ... ... . - - 14r—- � , - / �, 11 �, 11 /i / I - . .. ---'.- '�--, ,. -�1 � ------ I I I \I \ \ I 1, \ I ,/ ,./ -_ ---_- 11 11 " I 1./- � - I I,- �, C , �� 11 I� / �� I I I � ::E �P�l C11 . ��__��, -i- , I 1, k , \ \ \ \ , , \\ I , _� I ---------- 1--, - --- - , � � , k -� x 31-4 \ \ � , , I � .� � � , "I , � '_4._� / ,6 .��,�w�' \ " ,_1 '1� . __ �, , / ,/ \ I \� \ L \ I . 1 .11 __ __ I / / � '-__ -,, i , - � - > I,\ . � -,, - __ ,,�; / e� \ \ \ \\ (::�.\, / -_ / � 11 -_ , / , ,_ I I � � .y , - �--_.�_.- ; I I / --- 1� I �, - - �,\ - -,--�-,- _� :_.,�� .� " ,1- "I I .1. I - - - -, \ I � A S�op\�:�AOE �\ I - -, -1�- '� I� I i_- - __ � - - - - L-_._-��./I. "-7---_--- I , \ I\\ \ , I \ \ � \ I / - - I-, 11�' /___ \ I , -8 - �-,_---� -- 'A , \ . 7:-f B - � .. , - - / / 1, ._\ I I \ \ \ I I \ , I - / \ "I - I ,� 11-1/1 — I I I I "": j,,,��, _,,�, I \ I" -1 I / ,� _� /--< \� " ;i - , \ , 0, , , , \ �A 0 c, � ::�� — - I \ . - � ;. - \/ �_ I ; ; I � 11 I" , , -:,�,r-�,�,-� - -- - 4,- _r�_ �', ,!.\ \ \ \ 1 I / I 1b., __� i - "" �,�,, i �� _� - il 11 � � 1 � ,_11_� I I / _� - -, -*-, � \ \ cicull" - i FF -.-::--44 DO--_- 1 1 't'. -0-------- 7,_ ,� 11, _,7 ____,� � \ Q) 'I-- ; - __ __ .� _� I ;i I I k N�_�,,\ ,Z�, - -- - - - , �, - I\ . N _�_ . � -\\ , � \ 1 \ \ I \ 11 \\ , " - . __________� �11- ; --- I � % � " - ___ I i--+- __ Q - - 11 � Y, 3116 (p � IJ; I J_-,--,/I,C�,e��I -,�'�l, , -- - _l --- __� ,1 1 �: I A" -_^_�, � . . � � � ; - I ,,!.-'N \"---, , "r __ _- " \ , \ , , �� , '\ \ , � , , , / / z __ - -- I i ��' � � � )-l-i I ,-), � __\ '', --,\\ \ 1"), __+1 , -------11_' k 1_7_r� ': . � \ \ \ , \� \ \ ___ I 8 � 1� � I 11 ,:�__ � � i -1__ �_`9 I, --!� :� ----.__ - -� , , -1 _- "�' 1/ k , -, � I I " \ �, / __ - __�_- �. - - / , I � I 11 -, 11 -�, I I , , tr ,, ,% _,� ---I-, -� _r \ I , �', n 0 0 - -_71: _. I �-/- : _,� , -1 i__---___ - I '-V \ \ , I / / - __- ", - -. ��01 �� , ___- \_ 1, _/ " I I �,Q� - - - � I � S� - / 11 � �� :)I \ - \ U_IX). �1 � I 1'� I a �, ____ __ , . - -� -. --` /�,-�- , � \ \ -\NEW., MASONR�' INING I I / I � �, �� _ � - I -, G� I . E 400 - I - I -1 i I I \ �- \ ___ - V / ,��z i - - \_�- .. -J. " ..\ , , ' ' - - _, , .----- _��_!:-- -- . _L�� Z_g � ,_7 1.� , , , ___��LL A\_ � I / - 4, I .. /FF � 11 � 1�j� 11 " �n (.Q - ________::.__7!_:::____� __� . . ,�/ - 1 , I W , I� , 1 I _", I I ;�\J' I I I - N I - _:�,'L ;� , I _ - I-- -1 . T11 _�, , ,N�91 . I I- L - - - .\ I ,� , � � / , I I I__ I \ ) - , ---- , �, , I I \ \ , 1 , , I / - \� __ _ � i�_', - -", , � _� I I I \ j I - `z --t " , \ \ - -- .- _ --bla- I i�_, / " , I __��__ _:� -, , X-1/'-'/ " _.!n-_-=t�ez-"!�-,-�\ \ 11 - I , -----' - , � \ _I'- i I __,__� I � , x , \\ (::)1��-�6 � � I � ' \ , \ (D .- - I , - " 1, \ ! � - - __ %, j � I I I - __ . 11� , I/ , _;�- \ ' �_ --- , - -1 16 '1� I � i I ' \� ____-��--:77 -__.:7'!-- - . , 1, \ � / --- , __ ,;�� -1 _�-__�_, _ ___ "I , .��-____ � \ I - ,\. , , I-- / _�__ -,- 0 1 1 "� , -7 - \ -> .. �� I 11, .-V �_ --Z:,�, 7, I ::� \ ' TOP\OF WA\LL ,= 36.(�O " __�--_- / \ T'AP ' ,,\ __11 __ \ ,P' 0) !I, I ,/ 41- ,�,,11",,�., .\ , , I \ / �� - .- ,� �, � 11 A �, - ,-,,A i�R _�__ _k I , _Z__,� , , - - � ill 1� .. I /, 11�,� , , N-�, \ I \, I \ I _\ _4,'O --- I I /__ --,, --, \ . -" \ �, -- - --_,z__- N I ." . ; , - -� , _�, "'X \\ L \ L \ \ \ - / I L � %� __rr-t:��! - _� i��, " i - \ I 1, i�- �z -- , I / //, L __; "I - ! -, , __ v ,/,/ ,�,"\ L _,�'.\ ' _ I I I . - I ,� .. " . /L/,�, \ � \ I I \ / , /� ", I - ,.�/ , ,� - --- 11 I f. � . , -9'��,\- �� I / I I -,-- A, " N I , \ I I \ --- ___� 11 / 1 z 1 I , \� -��, . I 1111 I !I I . I \ \ / I � %i �� - \ � I I , - � I N A\ " *) " , � � � __1' - � -1- -�-� &`�M,1!11� , , _� -1�-�� I � , \ I I I "IX - 1� ____1 I I \ - -, ; _� -, � I - S _ 10� ,� - �-__ 1/1 .* I ", \- , - _� - I - � - I L . L I ,_ N , \ _n " ,'--- ___ ` � ,_ I 1 � I � 11 _-.1 ,_," 11 / i / ', I I -1 \\,� ,�'.\� L\ \ \ . \ . /-�/ /__ ., - --- I I � , �- , I , - _ L I ,��) � � I I \ I \_1 I \, \ L ___`,� , sju\�,\ G I I 0.3 / / / "' � \ \ \L \ I � " ___ � i ,,�' �,- / � _____ - ___ __� . , �, � ____ - I ',__� - I ./ I ' ��,,,,, '' �,","", i,��,_,��,, \ \, I , -11,_�_ -- - - _:�__ --,-- - '! � - / '1� -I- I � _;I � ". ��'.. ` ,�n� " , . _ ", \1 I , -�\,�\, \ \ I \ I , , \ __ I - - - - � " 'I) I ( I 1, I 0 , �"," '11'4�' 11`�, �, ,a)", , 1 71 ", /", -I' 1i _____ I--,- % N, L, �,11 'We " ,�, I I�, 4 / - "d , W) L 11 - 1� _�`.� �'�, ", /M�"" \A , \ , I I - � I I ' _ _ - -, , ' / � L,�, , \ I ,". I - >\ � I i I __ , , �*_., m \ �, , � � . ' � I' : / 1, I , �� I ,",�l".,,L',��"L�",��,,�,,'�......�"""L"",�,,�"L�,,��,��-,,�, � .....J�,,� -\\\,' " , '�" , ,V -,-, IL \ I ) , , ,\ , " \ /i, ,/ / �7� -- ,_ - / ,, � 11 ,- , , i I . ; ----__- 0- � / 11.��'.'�", �, , '� " \N,% '. � - \ I , I / ,4 _ I i . ," "�,,�%L"LL �_ I . �A w , y ,)��'��",�',�,��',',,".��,�'��-,"-,�, "', .,',�, '.?" ,,�;,'�& I \ , , " \ \, , � , lz ,� , -_� � , , _,,ffi,,",'Fb tl%fi�L,'Pff \\ �,4�,� / I . , ,'�, '', , 7, � I - 11 36.4 1 1��11 i 1 I _ � --0.X, I , �"_\ ';_ � ,\ " I % I J%U� 1 �11 -1 11 _N. k \ \":- % ,I -,- , L , \ , 11 11 If-- - � �I I I I -L, -T-ii / I I �� , . \ - / / 1�' � 0 � a 1\�\ , I \ I I �/ \ �, ��- - 'I,' I T �,5 \ __�,_ - I � - I ,� , \�1_1_ N \ \ �,, I I �', I � �,W\Vil I - _f"_ - 1 .90 1, /-L\- — I I I 11 . L . I . _# V"'z§.,2 �,%:,4�,,012, 111 , '* I ,, , - � I � � I",,""-"�;L,�,,�l",",Y��'-'��lI . ___ - — 13 !'-, ,_11_r \1 \ , \ ,1'1'!!�_ � I ,,--- , \ f,� � I -11,1,".%,,��,,-,,, -�,-,,;��,,",�',,',�i�T"��,,--,-L!Y,Z , . ", , 1.11 , \ , � , , / — �_ � ---f � . c) : ; ,,,�W',,, "). -1111.1 . \ / I b, ', r,z�,�,, ,,,,,,,,e�,,',,�",.�,,��k�;'.,,��,*,��,',�l�,�,�'�,,,,,',-4'1�"�. - L , / I - - ,� � ,? -, �_� � ' - ------ Z al� _7 ,,?,", . , \ ' � � � ,, , , _0 I 0,W-11 1�,I 1I.- \ . , I - __ --- 11 I / a ,,, , \ , , � ,_7� / / k I __ - '1� \ N.N , - \ I * \��( ___:'__ / L ,� -_ __ I �, ��_ - - I - I "I, I - .1 I\ -----------, � ! � ii I i ..-1 * I � 11 .�S'1�1 " ,� � I . - L, -_ , -- - 'L , , I- __\L , / I . , '�16 �� I. 'PRE"e1�1I" \ *.'.L \ I , / - ',,,�SO.A'11 � I ___� , � � 1� 7 01 ** I ,�� . ,,� , - I , _� , 7 f , - — � . ,,,��,� , , I ,� 7� �A / / � I i�,`� -1 \ f 'r �,% , , IN g \ N ,� I -� , � I - j #I . \ \ ,. \ 1�1- I - I I I I �, I - , " , "p""": ,�""",,V,,:��,,.�,,;,�,1"",-,"�'.-,�'L,�"-�,�,�,�'��..��,��?,,�-,�� \ - I I Z ) ��n,�,.-�,"C,?'L-1,�,rP.'P,,. f`��.",,',�',, 1�;'�"A�, " \ , I � \ I /DC // , / l, - I 1.\ !\ I i � ,-,� .I /�,, � � 1 1/ :3. ��i� ", , �� , I �K , � . -z' \ ,,_ - , - � "�,, I , , "'',)�'','"�,�',",��",",��,�.,i"_��,, ,�,,", ,,,'�,,,,, \ L \ ' \ ' 5, 1 1 � � __ II , ., , �� I - -�,- 1, , 1-1 \ ,L I � 1�- � , I I . � i ! I I I ,� , , ......,`�`N`�,�i�.�"N'A& \ \ " \, \ -,--I_---, , I L L 1� Y I " / �, I i � i I Q0 I / I I , , , I , L I � _/kk.-o, , 1: _� �___ 11��, I - �" ' - I , � "'zL,�,"3Q I I I I - _�_ I , - \ ' �� - �' 11 I � � I� /,� � I, I ,.,.'',"1-1 '.1.1, , \ I � \ I ,1 '7 � I -,- /- � 9 - ." � - �, i , " �- , 1-7 -1 � � 1'� �; � /, . \ - );, �z,��m�!,`� N",� '011 � -4 , "" ,\,. L ___� ;-�_ - , , , i L , " - - �,",'�,��,,,,��-,,,�l,,',��,L-i,��"""�.",�,�,-,,,�,,,,,,,,,,,�,��-��lli, ",� 0 _.,�, "I�11 I ,/ � \ L, o", L - , �i. �,,,,�'k,-,'�,� �11�,� \ ,V, I I , I, �� / I / __I� I G _.- - (D�, I 1 \ '� V) I � L "L ,&<�"��)� - % %\ - ' 't I : L � \ . ) 1 � ,1,� � __\ ----- _- _�_ � I n 0 /_� . � , , , / __`% I / ; ;-,,,,,,��, 11LU1,'1,r,`1,1`1,_�," A, i , , , \ 11 _____ -_:�-< . I ,"�,1�1-1,"�`�` " I I � L", """, �",��"",:,;��,��,�,' � _� / - I I'' I -,��,kL,��.,',',��,,,��,',,-�""",,�,---,,,�-�,,',�.�""�,�,V,�,�,,`i',',�,,t"L�,"; ��,'��,,,'�",i,.",��",��,,,,,�*�,,,,�,��,,,',',,�,�,,,,,,�""";"�',�',,�'I'�",'�"�',"�',."-��)��",,��*','-,".('�,',',,"�,-', -�.',',,',�,�)�,��LL��,-, \ \ \ . , \ __ I - ' -n � , \ - , � ,'-,'�L,�,-' ,iL.`�:��,-.�;Z�!��,,� R It R lli.�1'1.1111_' 'Ww��,��, \ , \ I ___�i �_ \�f\ \ � � , . I I __� 0 i �,��,.,.,, , '&��'�'-'.��1,,�,�WP,� I I I I , , 7 , �. I I/ -, ' ,!'i",� i- " , , \ � � 1� I 1_��/ _ _-,,,_-� - - , � I , . , ` x 0 ,,,,�,M , ;;w -I ' , , I? '', `� -_,��`L"",' , Z,�,`�,��'N�,_- §�fL��:�� C__ 11, : / I '�'�' - ., L , ____ ) . I I � � -;:0 jj \ � � ! / ,,��,�,"?"*,��I'l�,�.,��.�,�"1""�� ,L�,�,� __ _�� ,I 1 32.02 "I �� . � I , L , ,," "",�,"'I,��'�'�-j , . �� I I ), __� i i __ ; 'L,ij JI I I I � # *. �, , , / � I �� "' �, " � _ \\ :1 11 � i . I I "I � :" L, .D, ----- ; 1, - I � 11, 1 � ; / , ,,;,, ��'�,- �J'l��,�""","��""�",!""�"�"�"""��','�.��",,�� - --L-<------- i \ , 1, 1�,�17 1� ' �� , �� .1 1 1� �I I I , , - "�,';�, " '� I - I � I , � �,"'�r��,Y,� " "I 1, , 4 ��1 �" � I I , t��[ �% �', � �VM"�!,,'P _`11�1 . I I, L � L � \ �' I __ " � \ ",,"7 C.4,-16 ��,� - "', - , , "_ \ -_-1. I ______ 1 . '13.0 � , 'L,_, I I , ��,"�, I -;,� , .� 11111- � I : 1: i 1: I I 1� , " \ 0) _- I I " � I - , . . - 10 , � � � i I 1-,_ I I I - . � --- , "� I r1i � � 1 � 1, I /, - I I � � � � , I I I I = 33.00 ,L 1-," , , - I , ) '"114 I : L � \ -0 la_��_� I T = 37.UU : , , 11 - , ,,�,.T, � I , M�, � _�, 11 I .11 - - --1 -�__ - _" - �L . !E - I / /e , 1 . ,;,"�,,",�,' ', "N' I�, 1 � � I \ �� I ___ Q , \ , " _�_i � , I # /� /// L T� 4, ,P ;k.1--- , L I ��:��:'�:,��'��%Lj.� "' �ill,�"I'll,�,��,��I'l",,��,c,�",�.,,��,,��,�",--,i�,�,,"��\��,�L,,,�."�'-��'�".",-,.,,,�,,�, I � 1 � / \�, I ,�! 1� __ ,, \\ \ \�, � \ I I , , I i � .�,, i�_'-"A'I'lLcl',"�,?1'1,�, ,�,,�, I �� I " 0 ' , , 4/ - L. - I I \ _�_ '� ,__ - /_____.� ,-1, I 1� I \ \ , - � � . , f I , , '�'�';'�'�L",� _";, I I L� ,, ��r ;, I I I I I // � "I I -I L,�_'�"-��,t�',_:�,'��L ��,,:��", �,.'�,��",�,L"',�L"'�": -L �',�,�'�,_�'��;,!�'�"" I 'L � -'L_ �, - �L �1�1 � � �) I I I / � ',�, 11, ,� �', ,� " ,L,�,�',�,'.!"� �. �� ,L�,,",.�"�_ ;��",:, 'L L' L I K, �I ' i - I I � \ : : ..�, 11�, -ti-__ ;-�]��7 - - � , I � ,� I 'I- . I I /I. , , - �', �L" / - / I I � i � 'L. I , 5�:�� ,,__-� , I * � � I . I I , , - ,�,;��,�;��',�',�',',',�;�)�,�', ��,�,�, I _� D �, , " r� - , , ! \ I I " -, �,'-��,;"�,�,�.,�,'�"""��,i'�,,,,,,,��4�'�,��:";,"��L�',�"'��,�,,��i'-",� _ , '. / I : � '; ,,,- -��-_ I � ,., 1, - L -11 ` I L I / --- I ��,,�";:�""",�;�-,,,,��,��:,,�',",",",,t��'�,I,�,��1,1��""-�,'�,�l".""L""�,� ._-�',;:,!, , _ / . / / I � � __/ __ __�_ �3�1 , I _� - I \ I I I I - '. '' �Z'81'11;:,��11\- I I� I 1, . , 1� L � , I , '.1 I I , J"g," � /I 1 \ '\ I � -7 -I-- � _� � , . % �1_1 I " � � -, -',-,�L",-,�,��",' ., , �� i", , � / - I I L / \ -- " I -� ,I � -, __ _____1 I ," , !t I I , � ,f -, -1 %Iln � /, - f / / / I I - , I — � ----�-�--_ _5- �'-- 1. 11 = 0 � \ f I ,,�,�,,,,,,,, ", �'_� f / �( I I ; . , .4;��_ 1�<. - C_J '-g- --,,, ., __ i I- _111 ,��,,,�,��,�""-��'��'-,,��',��-,,��',��,,,�"""-, , �;�� ","," /I / , ax - _�, , ` ,,�,,\,, i " I 1 2 , 1, 1� I , � L� , ,0�1�,�, ,�, , ,'n ,,- R ,,MR,,,� ,,:il," 1 47 __-, " , x � I ��_,il,��, I _Mi� ,�,,�,, ,�,R,M,"FE � -� , " .� i a _- � 1, I � , . _ �, _�_� I , I " - �Y , , �. - "� , t �- �2 ,,"N',,�,,',,),��,z . oF � I . I ,"'�, ,��', 4 - _�� - i ",", , f / I � __ -\ �",-,__§N','� 11 / ./ i / � --!�' �z \11 I ,/ , , � ___ � ,� ,, � ,i -4-- ,,, " -__-� i . I -I ,� , R m,g,�-,pa� / /-- / / I 1, I � \ � I I ,�I /�-' , 11 11,I � L� ,�, g , , — / , , .,,�,��,�",',IfA - � ` . _�g 1 � I . � I I ..", /V-% . 11 -) , ; - , , �j 0 �'r�'kM-,� , - , " - ",�- " - " ��,'0.-,-, ,�i-,,ig, "I I I , ��)�!\v I � I �� 33, ,� , � o �. i , "R - I I �11�,,�'$LIIIK�14��;" , . I �, I i � - .. � � � ,,�"I'x " _'�; � �'$LIIIV,�;" " - "",- "",- : - /: -,�,�,`,�"L- -�` % , , , ,) - -P I '1'1� 1i_`� -1 0�1,"' """", � *� f ,,-f�',',4N-��LN ,,�, -,j" I ; z� --- I , , .1 , - /_ "."'-L";,""',"" ,�"`�"',&�., /"/.' I f , - ----- - i - � / , 'k " �� I I ? I i , I __1 1,I I M � /1'i�_ ,�) i I I ,, ",, '10M "I""'i" 'I - / I I � I I � I � 0 , - � jr !�/, ,,�_&-, � I 11%;`N*N'�Wz / ,/ , � I : � I ; " , 'P I � . / I;�," I ,� "� , ", ., 11 ,Ile I 11'1� 1, / 4 � � I : , ,��,��'�,,��,�",,.,?�,,��,,��,�"-,\"",-�lI I / ��& ,�, �),XW ,,�� I , , / ..I ""��'L"L"',,""", , �� / 1 -� ; i I � � , �" 0 ,\� /,., .1 ,, - - : I I I � I i �,".','?�4' ,, �-" > ; I � , , I ,� " 111�__-/(/�,"\ -\10 -,� , � � \� : _r/ ��) , I , .,� / . / 1, r : I � I i _�� 7' I � / / - ,�,� W L\,/ I � 1�_ - - � I ;, � I I , x 32 1 " I - I I-, __ . I ; NSMH 2.13.0 � -/ ;� I 1,� 11-1.. 11 ;I 1. ,��'. I , _ , "I I . I I __ - "I I � �, � �,_ i I - - F) " �' , . / � I � "I �_� I , 21 = . / / /.� I , / �__, -1 "- �',',� " � NQB 4.23.1 / / � -_ Og,,�� , .0 _ , / . .� / � , 41,k ___A�_ � _�, - : � / I / 4 ,10" "r 'j /,/- . I/ , � j / 11, .36 . T = 33.70 --_,- ---, -1 I - / : 'I" I 11 - A / , I " � i � ' ) � � I ; 7,I I , %01 I / I / �j li . I i I / / �, - -ll H 2�.1 3.5. 1 1 � T = 36.55 , �� lb- I = 29.70 ;--'�L -,F � I'%`" I , I I � , - 11- � 101 ------��, " ; li� I I I 1, I : / , �# I I N��,.l / / / / . I ! : � I / I �" I I : T = 40.50� : I = 23.11 1 1 �� I ,�': \ I - � 0) I ; ,._� i ,; I K "� / / ." I I ( I �� ! I I � I 1 307, --- tl_ - I �2_ " � # V � / I . / I / :, . I - 1,1, '- 1�0.__ I = 36.50, : � I 1\ , � 1.I .-, 41 1 1 1 , / I 'I, '-F'L��`�"'�'�'�;� / : I / I / I " I � NS , I t , \ I f 'K I ______1 1�� I i _.�A � , / : I, I � ,;111, ',� / ,/ A , , / , / L / I / � , � , \ I , � � I �',,I�, I . , I � ..) __ I ,, , - ,, i 1_i_� l� �,� �_, I , , , 1`11' I� / ,/, I, . I / ; � I 1; f , I K,11111",4.4,,,,� �, , __1 , 1;� -,I % I I / * , , 1,,,,�� ,;�?.'A�,W,11,', � , , ........ / ,/ , , . / �`)%K,/,/ , /I:/:� P_ L I / I '), , /� ' , , - 1 - l i . I'll ._�, I . I I / I " / , = 37.20 - � !�,/" ,�, / k � IN , I I � , , i I I " , / / I � IV�:��, ....�.', , I / I I , ; - \ I i PO I I I .1.,��,",� 'X�' "'" � V.,/. , f I = 33.20 / ;; /,///, - 34�6 ! I I " -, � I _ '�' g,��Rii�`� '. --- I�I I I / : r ,.g'4, L , , / � _�_� ��,�,�/), ", '� " / %� / I . "�',. ,�"" ' , / ,/ I I I .. r / I I k T = 30.80 � _,__�__ i , c I 'L��q�,,, ,;,,,,,-;�.��,�''�L�`,,�;§,�,"� �1! / I / "r e - L ,Z 7,,,, -" 'P . "��,� _____1 x �� , / : I L _ '. / I / ( ,, _; 80 -�, j I L ..1.�.-1 1,11 11 _ �, . 111,11 / * , I / . / .--------- I I I I I . I I = 24.08 1 - -,--Ll ; ,i P�__� - - � h /. � � � '�,`�";Q�I'A 11.1 "1`111--`_1�1 ,"" /// , I // / I - I �I I I 1 1-2. �I� __ ,LA,L- ::�_ I % � � � �� '�"� , I - I N 1�i'R`R,`_111R � '--,---,-' � I , � �1, / - I �, ", , I - , , ,__ " A) -* / , :)" / / i I .<, �I� ; i I , LL. , , 1� / : /, �!,',',.�,,�",�",,','t, ,", �',,,�ff,��L" �,��;R.`,, , " / . , I " / - I � I i L I I ''__�� ,ii! �� f i ,__ _ , - "N'", I I � �___ 6 OF 18"O HDPE � 1 11 i � I I , .�,:�',,�,"��,��,`L,1� I , v111-11- I / I : "', j 2 ;�"";1�1.1��",' 'L�,�:,�,�,`�, , ,n�I / 11 � I I / " i� ! il, .-Ar --I- � , ,P,-W 3 21�5 / i �� , ��L, 1 ,1 ,/ .* , / I I I I , � ,1-11.1- 1� I ",! ,� I / i I , I .;I � 'T 11 11 L I / �i i � _��,�'�',�_�::��""$ I 11 , / - I I .4, . C,; � ,�A ; i , . (A N a L �_ � , , * �L'��r,� ", ZL;� �,,�,,�:, d-1',L�, ..... " �,4 .*' -- , , I I I � ; ill, �, I I _ _ ____- PIPE @ 2.40% 1 �'111 , ' ' ' , , 0 , I I //I . i ;; �:, 1��'� �!'J�; �'_,��......4��, / y / ." 4V; , li " , fp --A- ,f I `- _5 I � � -- I L" I ,��, ,�, I I I .1 . - 33,3 ! l'i 3�' , . I I . I ,:� ��, I I " I - I , , � i -1 'L 'I'��"';_'I ;': "�_',�, L�, ,IF I / i , , I , I I � LLI 0 1 1 1 � 21 3.�� I , OF 8"0,".'_--- " _, � - �,� � . > ; � _-\� // _1 I ! .1111-11-- r- _z-__ __ __ � I � I I �� . I : i ��,,�,��,'_ , - - , ��, , / . � ..:I:r I , / I o I I 11� :2 0 � I I "_�_'11_\ � I � "I -1-1--1-- � , � T 1 '_�",�",,,z,�,":�, I I/ i�__l/ '. / I ', EQ 4.22.3 ;4*1�Nr -4.22, __ - ___...,!., __ NMH 0 ,� 0 � " I / : I " ,� I -1 11 1, � ' I�L�, I 1. � , I < I I ,� ,-,,?-'s 'I. � , � I i - --- "z i _ --- � 1, . � � � � - L , I I i / I I " "L;'LL' I �11'1,1 ;�,� ��, 11,;; / , , / (� . I / , 11 I I =w P_ �,li I I I , � M � (0 I ; � / : L I�':�L'��:, ''L�L�� L L'_ � I �,, / / , / .* / 11 a 4 < / I / L I I 1 14 1 1 \ I / , ", - � \ � , T = 28.75 1 1 � _: I I T = 32.77 co� � . I � ,\ 1!� � 0 1 - � - , 0 - I , ,.'� ��;'L`_ ��' -j__,� 'L"' I -< k. � 1, I = 24.25 "1, I = 28.18 N , 1 " " � �,�, � 11 I --1 -. ,,, / �, ��'',""�,�',��,L;, ,�,�:�,� ,��"L ;��I , � . . / , , , �,�, - � � , . �:� ',' , / I � Is - -. I I . , �, - , / / . <� , >-r \ \ I 1, / I—- � , , .i�l I I I i I -� - , ,�'L�',' ,"""L �''"L� I - , . I I I / / I �\ I I I ,'-,-' -, IL I = 22.72 S,E i , --, __- � � - . ; I i ,� , L'' �:,L��7�� il' I I " / � - L \ . I __ 1, �k I __ " " i I I . �� " ., :,;%, L'�� . L �] , / I � F_TC&G - , X '��j !� ;L I � : � , i. , ": / / �// 11 , C�_ _j �I/ S.- , _�_ _- , I -0 0 1 f- I : I ,�,�� 1� ", ,L;��"'':-"�,r,�":��,�";��"",!� .L,2 I I CD co _�_�_ — � , �, . ; 11�\ ,, �__ /11 � I � ) 'L.11 �""L _�,�,L .,,,,, 1, 11 .1 L, _ �'L .�' / . 1 I , / � I ,, �, t_0 LU NSM� 2.1,3. � ;;- - 1 - �� 1 , ) . I _L, ,�� , I / 0(4*, � _.� _-;, -_-__-__Z -,' I . I- : I ", - ,L'%��':,�.'�,�," ��'��:'�L "�'�'� "',7"" I I / * / I I f I � 11 ___71_ t�� I _ --- --- ; " i � - __Z� � � � L .. - , ��L �, _:;�'I' _ I , / . , : U) L� I 'TC,40% "'1w -, __ _ __ I I ,\ � � / i 0 _', , ' �.�,'� ��, . I , . I I /I I I //I T =/35.00�� " i� =;;.P�- - I ,- . - I- I -1_1 I ,j __;_- � � � I I , I- I -i * I I , � 11,i�L��,,,'�,z,�`�� I I / I -—___- LA_ I , , ,I 1�� ; I !: , i ��,',,',,-_ — ,z/ - /1 � , ., ,X� -,�, " ,,-,, , / , I. , � -__ � , , , . F _�, , , 3;1 11 1. L ,� �,,-,, / � L � ,..&�,X'i 1.� / I .* " �, / " / /1 . I i, . - -,----'--- - I 1, � � I 1. \ " . . L I , , ,� / , /, / I -__ I , - - -, . I , & ,� I I- ,!�L" , / . . "IF � , '\'�H �� I __ , I / , ��`,��,�,"L',�:""'�" I I - I ::L 'L, / 1 I / I -�_, . # z . 1 6 . I / * , - � I ,/� I / � � I ., 1: I I I.Z i I / / , .1 , I I / I I / I / , , � / , � 1, I , � - , � i 1, (j) --r -, - 6.3 / / / I L I I , I tl-�g�.��,�. , , I / . , , � i o IF-H : , �� ,T = 32.65 , I ___1 __ " I ; , , - �� I : I ig'�"k.,',�, "'F I I , 'L - 4 - ,�, . , X / . / " / I / ��, \ � ii � " I I o�� g�, / / .. I 11 I �L I _. I L= 23.51 �\ -q-z-- -----7'----- 1. j, , _� / .i �1 i . r V "MI'Az,1, / I I � / s I ,- _- 1. I ; , — ; - . � I "�,�'6,�,,��l".,�?"�4"',,','� -, _77�-- ,- I 11 1, " I �,",",,,� ,'k,, I ,A � i 11 I I I I �_ ; I -T ,�,,, /111. I / / / — I � \ - — , __ I ,� / .1 I ", L * / , I , I i I ,,_,a, I � I 11 - � i 11 , 11 ,/ � , � .L$? e�, , I I / - � - I "'. I , — - F I i 1, ; -L. -�)� � __ L, . I / I , .. 11 ; , I o - _____ I I N I / — �� I 1 �i I -1 � ,� � i Q I i I 1, tpe%* . 11 I / I I i I I - IL ,., - � i � I i %iffma 1 .01, ,� / .1 , / I � I I / � I'll, \ i : I . __ � � .7' x I I \ i _�:. __�!___� , — � I ,/ ,I 1� " , * , , ; -C -L ')PI "'31 - �� -1 � _�_, / 1, W .1 / . / I I I I I � � � - I I I — — � � 4j I . ,� " I / I , , --- � 1. 11 L .1 ,0- , , .. I I I I I i I / I I � - .-I I � I --I- __ - I " I � __.1 I k.�, � I---)(_��/' / L 1�/ I I UJI , . � , — �� - - � I , — : 1 � , . �_,�11j . � / _� � I ,_ --, I k 1�_, / � � �� , 11 _' _!-� 1 i � B 4� , 1�1 .7 I :I .e I / � . / / ., I � I j _;:�_ I ,� - - \'L � I ; 1. _r � / \L __ 3 . � �� ,� � � I " ./ " - I I �1 / - I I () ' , L � / I ___ �', \ 11 I :,!, :� �, ; -I ! � , L . ', � I �-�1�__, ,�, -__11 1, L_.� I I / . . ; L, I ; , , / y 37- ___- � � \ ; -- _,------ . I � - --- - -5"u, I -- -, , , :r . / . . I -1 I --�_- . � x-1 3225 , ,* -;�:z7"(_P, 1� , �, .... -:11�'. " ,F .;�" , , � :/ 11 , . I / I � 11 ; I � ." I - .- \ ______ - rl\,.,.- � 0� _ ,,� I-, 1 _4_ 1�, �', t_-__1 I I .,_,� - - I __ , ,,,, / � -� I , I I / I I I I, . 1 4. �.L \ - �,_- I S�&`( � I I I = 28 ,� 8 4. M, - � � -1 / ./ 11 '."ja� '. - Al .09 I ; - , W 1, " "I i, �,ppf �V,�,,� I- , * , I I ; C()j\�\' G " I --W 7.-A -\ - - � �,,,_ I I �I .1/ V - 11, / - , / 1 7 , . ! / ; - I I � 1 i � --_.-__- \ � I -- .L� . - - — 11 I �,�i,�. I � -- - I / - L I / . i 11 � i � I I \ 1� - � � = 32.25 � i T- I �_ � I -- , -'_ I L � _ I I ,h' 'qr 11 ' - I / , ,,I I I ; I � - , I I/. I- i / 11 �_ . ) � I __� I, , - i / : , , I , f i 9 � I��- : 1*4 1 = 28.09 � 1� __��_,_("___, � ! � \ E,: , I I ...... I I , , / � ; �, �I I I � , t L I . . r � -i.i 11 � I I . I I� 11 11 I - /1 � ,, � t I - -.-g � ,",,,5 � (.11 %.)4 rn�L�$l 1� I t � _� ��,�5,_ I _,", /' " . "I I I : /, __ �I L i ---'- -- - � I 1, I .1;1-�, � � - t '� I , � i�-�7 1, / . / ,*_,"�"_,, __ , / � . 1/1 I 1 -7 co 34.x � � I ,� , \ ,. / I I / I W / o / / <> : � �/ , ' IN H 2. -ll- C)C) � I / / I / : . / :1 / " , I 0 I ! ,�/, - ____ FRNME \ , I I , I . . ,v) / ; � I � I � -� I � T = 31.8 _� 1 � I I �, � --- i I . \ � .� " " " / / �, ., / : 's/ � ; , , -,' I I . 1. � 1 S7,0��' , I � ; I � I 0 �� _,, Uj I -1 �, I: -_1. I / - \ " 1,� , - -------- \ I ,,, �AGE \ \ FF u_- \ ,�� ,� . , , �, / . / I .,� I �, 11 � /, / I : 20 1 1, : / / 1 , " I . __ -1 � I I i � ,,",Zffi�' - i \ i 1, r " I / I I , I ; � , I � � L I 1\ \ il . � �� I, Owl . I 0 r,'�'5, - , . �� : / . I �I . � � ", � _, _1B Q-,� I 11-1)�L � I i k \ �_ - I L � _�, _<\ "I U'/'� I- k � S�0?1 �� I \ \ �i I , -- - � , -1 �1 I �_� ��'3� - - . I -I-- , f i I \ `& I � - I ,-, , I i V) � ,� . , �-'__- / // 4, -""eA,."",I��,�,,,�,,��L;,�';,, I- -:�;;:zN\ / : � z " / I I 1 f � 1 , I �i � , � "�\ .C_C; � ! - __ - LL i i" � �'./ I � I - I - �I \I � � � ,\. i i /�,_�,� - \� 1\ ,-, � ��,,:, loo / L I �; I .I 1 / // L ; " i' / � I \ .--- ��-, , , � \ ! 1, �, I \ 7-;�11 I I CO / I .. / - I I : / i� " I - _ I I " ( VRAM \ , 17 � , :�� , _ , �"I , I "-�-�__, ol I I �) ! ! , � I I / fj L 1; ; I I 11 , � I I _ \I'---- .� � ,I �� , ,� .9 - " I \�� --", "L �_�,'", ,_� 1, I �, _ 11 14 ) !-, , L?4 - \ 1, I ,� -) 1, I � \ � - - '/ , .. I L : ;�� - I / �i ., R L.- - I I \ i " �'. , j � NSMH ' I , � �I � , �./ ) , I / I I \ I -P / 0 - � � / , I // I ) // / ; � .. I I � � I - 1, I 'I' ll 300 , . 1 "- / �� -A __ " --- I '. I 1< i I , : I 1, \ 35, --- , , , / ' - __ , , " 11 11 . / / / il -1 L' ,, I 11 I .I I � I // ;; i \ �L ,� 7 � I I NQ�_�4,21 1 7� ' ' 1 7� , " " I, , �"I - , ! t I I I , . __- . 1 i i E __ ,,,, I % t - - � I-,,_ ___11 � � � I .. / I � I . , q I . i ;� i .� i I I I I F _7& \ � � I --- I 1\1 111),, , , / lz� - / I , - � i% � If , I I I I () I , T = 31.80 1��ilr , I - 22,58 � � TEE � ; . ,,, � . / L I - A __ I - I I I 11 I � , I ____ � I SJOR R \f U,3A 11 % I = 22.42- 1 _-f L' ",7- ,, ,- -) � �, �I -1- I � -,� I . . , r % - - , �, - � - I '-,j _ i " 1�,-,� , - __1 \ -_f ., / .- 11- "I / I ; : I 1 i I � - - 00` I �,_ � .0 \ - I -- , -7 � / _�_ I _. . / I I I I , . ,# , -� : - : k 41 F A I i ---__ i --- ----- __ \ , _, - , �, ,� I I L L � � * I F -'' // / % I l. I I . I I , I i : I � I � ; CU� 1,I __T _ \ _;1 11� I I I I � , I I � I I I i \1, I - _f Y FRAME I 1 �L _ ) __ - __ // , �, . li / - -, -1 - � i I LL I . , I - L, �' I - , , I I I .1 . I /, \ , I / I , , .. : I ; / I � i I __ I . � I/jTbR � , �,� , --- __ \ __ - T, I _.,_� \ - / 1 7/9 - � � - -�F , I -.,-- - I - - / . 11 - � ; . I I I � ii � / -, I I I (� __ 1-1 I I � 1. I , , V , "I I . - - �____ -1 __ /I � I , � , ,/ / , _ I 1 0 .. I I I I � I ! I � , I I I - I - �, , �� -1 -11 � / If \ " , I I I . . I - _____� I � I W rTAGE I : , 2� / (' I I 11 / / 11 � / , / I I . I � � , , I I � I . � I _.i L __ ! I - � I I 1 , - I � 1- - - -� I - � I / , ,� I - �, . 1; � . -1 \ J I , , � i L IL - ; I - I L � 1 , __" I I " 11 I \ , -P I I �,1� , / r I I I / I - � � ; '. i , 1 I/ � , , � L I - I i I ; I -OU i I x, ; I _�---------� ; ---I!'--- .-- - __ I I ,_�_ - ,�,, � _� I ... / I , , - , , . I I I 1, 11 - I / I I ��, I /�L,31 � 28� 1, , �, 29. - I I� -, � " I F"� .., I I M ,� � .1 I 1 / ; , / , : I . : . � , ! I ! I I I � � 1, 1, ; , Bul i ,F�; I " L I I I I I - 1-1 -� , � �1 \ .. I / I - I ; � '; k � � I ' I I A!'t--; I I L , i I I I �, I I -,-, -�� I � � / 1 , * \ L L \ � _-�,__��,� i, . �_ --- --� , I : � ,� >1 " I � I - � � � I / , / . I . L I 'L . I , I I � I ! , , � " 11 " , I/ _1� (I \� / I � , L . // Jf -: I I I ' : I I . I A/ ,:' ,�! I � i �� ., \ , ,I L, ''I ," I---- ,� � , 5F EL=34.00 � � � 1� J �, 1,\ X'/'' / �, � /I I 1 _;�, I � I �! " / , // I I I 1: I ; / . I . . L I � , \ \ , I , 71 ; .1�1 i� 1 [ I I I : / / i ; , I ", // 11 / - -;III- �� // � �, i � � L1 FIE CARE COMMUNITY . I I � I I I I \ � \ � 1 I � . . �, I _� � � 1 � L � � / I , , I ,�, � 1 I I I I . / _-, 11, I , \ -1 11 I I '1� / I i/ i � I k �� / . / \ \ � -I- '. � � � . , I sll� , � I . \1, I i � I I / - � I. ,/ / ,� I � 11 � � I . / I I - ----I �, .. , I, I I 11 L � , I I , ; I I � ,- I I i � L -- I I - ; � I % L \1 i I I ! ; __ � I - 1 , i � � / , � \ 1, �� , / I __1? I I � � - I " - — F= E� 1_�,I ..� I � / � � I , ,__ 1, (I � � ; � , � I 1� __ I (;;�� 1 ; i , \ , " I I � ; I �____ / I . ) �, 1 ; 1, I - � _n Ul 1� L r .1i /, E= ,z� !E� , , � . � � I � � I .---- i I . ( I I __ _ � L , 1, , I , I � .. � I . I I - I _�^ I I i � 1 1 1 .. , / 1, 1, // I " , I I , � . I I 1 i� \ I I 1� ; ! ___l I- 11 __ i i I __I � I i I I I // Ill I ! I I I I -\, I 11 ,__ "I , � 1�_� - _ _ _ _ � " - � I I � � _n --A � . , � _ . , / �' "I� � , I \ � � I I "L i% I 1 ,�4___._ ,_ 11 __ __� I --_ - I _ I I � c�(0 I I � \ 1, . , I . I � � —-_-:�,-- I , I I I . I �11, I /// � .. I . \ �� , . I \ , I , I - I _� i I , - 1. � � L.,-)O " " L .. I I // " , , L � I I . I I : � \ \ '' \ 1) / �- � 11 ,., �,---;� - ____ ___ _ � ,_ ��_1_11 , � I � � , ', I I ;i \ I -'e- � � ��, I ' : " , zi -, I _11�� i - _ ---,I-" I I � � � \ j � !. i i �, L , I I - L I _/, I . I I . � I - / " I I , I I :- i , � � , 1. \ 1� I \1 �, I/ t 11 I 14-- - _;�, �,,��. � 1 .2_�" 1 - � I �. J� I � I .,_ �1' 1 , /// I I � I � �L LL . \ � I /� � , _� __ ,_� / I 1� I � 'L " ._- � � I x �, 1 PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD " \ I I : � 11. 1 , I L . I � __ � i "�— \ . --- r I �i \ � � 11 :, I I I �� (, .��jpl;3 " 11 � �11 I " �— \ . \ % I I / / i _� , � � I , __ �� , I � �, ". : k I %. "I - � --- _., I . /I LIMIT OF \ \ � . 1 I \ � � I I " "I / I - % \ \ I I � 1, I . I 1i - __ � � O', " �, �', ; I i I , --- ---L __ . I r - ,� - , -C)-, ---- -- _, �L . , � , �, 11 \ \ : *.I . I %, � I L / I I --- --- � I I � _�1- "I 1- 11 I � / � �� - o I : , � , � I I i . I _ , / I \ � -, I I � , 1: 'L I" . � , '. �, � , .1 L� , I \ \ : . I \ � \ � I � , / -,i. 11 "I' Ill/ / ' / � d "I �. " I I '' , WETLANDS I \ : � __I I � : � I I I L IL b I �- / � �,� � -1- % \ I ; - I - . -1 I . I �3 1 U41 At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD , � 1% L I , \ , .1 i I I / I I z " I / I�_ , � I 0 I � I " 11 I \ , � I 1, I � % '.1, " ,� �1� . � \ 11" I "--I--, 11 - I " I ,� 11 - I 1 , .-I � I I I -1 _�� "I", ,� \ : � i. \ \ �L � I I Ir / I I . _L ' I --- -1 - I - - �,� I 'I- il -i , I � " I I - I - -L , , I \ \ I 1, � � I I . � �- , � � � L -� -1 I , 11 / - � ,: �� L Suffolk County, New York 1\ \ . I ; \ � i / -- -, I / I f I I �-" �-�1, ' k* \ '' � � I , \\ � - I I I I i / \;\ � _1 - �7 _______" �, " I I I- : .. � -, I ; I , , .C3 - 11 \\L I I% I I \ � I � \ 1 � / I 11 I I \ _-, " �L -_ �',I I I 11 I I __ oo ; - ,-I- \ �L _- � .�, � I�CA . I I I I --- , I - I ,�j \ I I . I � I : � I I t - __ , % , �� ____ " . I I 11 .� �, I \ . I \1 L L \ � k �L I I i I I � / I I i / " � I \ ( I L __ I- i� " - oo I I - I -1 � '' ` �' EXISTING \ 1\ � C3 I 1i � \ � 11 I � I /I i 1 /7 '', \ I ____._ 4��, 11 " � I � -n ,� I 11 ; I ______ I ' I ! 1 �� — - \\- \: , . I I \ I � � � / � I , / "I I \ , I _ � - �0, / " �L� __ '' I � '_�' � \_ I . , , � , I i � " ' ' I � _' I \, \ I I I I � \ \ .- I I 11� � -1 - � . I � I I i� � I 11 , / I ; IL �111T, ,�—--------4--, 1 i ,,, � v ,/ �,' (� � - . �L �_, I 1� 1c: L -� I , I \ L � \ I I i \ � � �7 � I - , _� _,, 1 � i 1, ��t I I , " I � L'' L , � , \ t , � I 'J � � \ i I I I � � . � . Suff. Co. Tax Map: 1 1 1 25 - \ \ \ , .\ , i� I L // �11_1/ I � I __�__ ,, ! i 11 I . ;1 ! Q� 1, 1� " /I�, I � V I \ L . N , I .\ � I I I , I L I t " , _____� __ , I � I�; I I/ , � ; s � - - ,1 i� �, __ � � ) District Section Block Lot -- 11� I \ . I I � I I � I i I I � 2�1 3 1 '. i ,---- - , I � � , / � / , � , � � ,,,��l � WETLANDS � L'\\ , , .\ \ I � 1 1 � \----/ I I / " I I — , , i - I- - 'j, �i 11 . // - \'�l / , ` �� ; , �,.� � I \ \ ,. I : \ � \ t � � L : I � I . I/ � / i � � \1 -1 __ __ST , �RNIII- / :C I L , - — - \\� \ : \ " I I � I ,/ L f � ; ' � I � A 1, z)I .J _� � ---------.Ooq ,,� -��Ik I �, I. � L ! __ � �_� - . / / , -1 "" � N 0 \ \ . \ , 1, I , � - � _COITAut 1�1 I , j , , � /, I I : I � \ . \ �QR� / TES \ ' \ - I \ � I I � / " � I ! - '% � � I I I : I � I I k� , 9 1� : I� I -),. 3o----- 1 \ � �� . I 11 - I - '7�� 1 1 � �� , � , I - \ \ I I I , il 7 , . � __1--.--___- � / , I j , � , � I 11 � � \ I , " � - 0 ,, 'i ,.� �_,� I � I � I "� / x . / / I "\ .P ��,�,-, �- - I I I , ; I I A : \ . I i I I ! I \ 'L�, ,, / � \ " L I J� ,5 / / ," I., , " 1 L I I � � ; S1 TE PLAN 1 . ALL PEDESTRIAN PATHS WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE \: \ . I , \ n I I I I I ____ " I I � 11", � s F �rl i �) �_ I i , - �, I L I L . I I � - r _______________'� ! �, I - ,-. / _,� i �()\� FRAME ) ,- �, 1 2.()Q ,1 � I � hm ,I-, _n U111 ; � -,",, i � � - I \ \ : � I I I I _! I I / - L, I� � 3 � �, � I � � . SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 FEET IN WIDTH *\ I . � I I , . I �, : I -I 1 � \ CU I I AGE . FF EL;r__ )� / "- � I � " 1, 1 14. ,I � \ �I �� WETLANDS I ! I � - I ----,-- , � / i . 1 - 11 � I i � . ! \ i / � ,,, I I \ � / ,� !�:�O, , I I -1 L.\ , k I . . % ; � � I � / I I I I / A i 4 P" �0 i � ; � -oo . � I � __ _� \ i ,_�) J" /� I � \ . I --------- ;,_�Y, , � i 1. I I L . I i I . 1 ,_____�� I 1, ��O I � I � � _ I I , I I I --i � / - -� 51�, i 11 � '7\ F NE ., - AND SHALL BE SURFACED WITH WOOD CHIPS I , � ,_ \ % �- �I � i 74 i, / " 1-7- _�I_r .�1 ' O.�O li� ' 3-� �� -- �" � \ \ I . I I I I � � I - - -- __ I I � � /T= 3�FO x , Fil-,; . I� - � ')� ` I . � i I I - I � � 1, - --�__ ___ . \�._,- . 1 i . I � . _—, 31.25 ,---� -, � , 0\�,, G� ," ,/ - . � S — � I _, Cr� - I ; i � , _, .11 � P, - .- -3,2 / , I I: I I __ I * I --- - , I L ,;�I Eu, .00 I = 21.51 0 11 .1 V � I � MATERIAL APPROVED BY i u , *� ' . , !� I __ , / /I � I - '�-�� \ I FF \____ , -1 /I I ",,,� *Cd) 53.6' - � 11 - - I L � I i , , I I � i � , , I ! :; 'I � (\\ / ,/ � _� ; --- - _ �-_,-, X, i � , COO- r I " �� I- -__-__'� i . `\ : , � : I � , , I , I ; � I i ��-- _�,�," , / . ; .� __ " �_'�-- �, " � !,- -1� ; ' ' � 0 -_ - 1, i� - - i I � : ; ) ; ; I I . �, >, I I - , � � , �1 I -" '4 � ( . - � 0 1 1 � � " ., / N S 2 M4 - j � \ � L - I I �, , I I , I , �,� I I - � THE N.Y.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL : ! ; � , I ,-,/ I I ,-,, i , � - I ,I I i *A ! , \1� I � ,� � I . I , �, I x L ,; ��.C)o I _P_ 4 1 . - 11111 I I .� I �, 1� I \ \ 1, I \ 11 --..- _1 I -_-- � 11 ,, � I \ LO , # , i �!,/ L \ � , 1, , \11'. � _. I " L , . - ,�" ,,- ;_ I ---___-- �,, ,�, ; I � ( * I , , TION. I . I - I " , I , / I - I r � "I , - . \ \ \ ��_ '50 : I #�24.00 , -, -1-�7_ � �- , i - �� ; TEE \ . _____ 1� I - , / I I I I ; . I I I / I 1�1 - - k ; -_' \ \ \\I" ' "___� I� i�/ I-.---_:�-, __. -7, _ / i I �� - ___ 1% ,��, I,- --____ � 11 � I'� I , . _ - - " � . I \ �K '� , I I ' , , 't , r / f . \ �, " _ - \L / �� KI T I , — : !�, _�11 ____ 11 : I : L' I , " I , I __ , \ A L , � \ , , , N5MH &11�11- 11 i; !��L� � , , :/ 4 / I I 1/ � I _/ , I I LL I I " 3O.f5* A 7 \ -I i �; 0- - - )� � ;� __ , : : I � ; - - ---" \�,P, I = 10./D -1 )i i-) I I 1, � _� / . L I ; /I " <L, T--33.75 1 �1, � � , I I WOOD CHIP PEDESTRIAN PATHS WITHIN 100 FEET I , ; I I I I � I I I \ I ��,8, , (__`L � - � = 24.75 1 1 1 - 21.83 �`�I i " I ,� 3'I�1� ) A A - � - � ' ,, ,- N 11 __ I '1�-,I I I -__ , \I L 1, ,, I * I � I : _ - 2. ALL BARE I I ./ I '.1 , ! I i L __,;;�� - 1, -,� ,7- " ' �_ I -, ,� ,�� , � , OF I I I "� ' � I , I / - 1 -4 ,,, , 1, I , ' I - ___--- --- 1-1 I I 1- " — 1, I , i 11 // ,�� _1i, � 2:5.� 11 I I I I I .1/- , I I 11 I �, \ L \ \ - I ,, / .S @ 1.613% I" �C__ _,< -_.- I i A WETLANDS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH WILDFLOWER MIX I �* 0,0': : I � � ", I- - .;� -,��, Z�� 1�_ , , . ____ � _. \ I \\ \\ , \ I - ,-AV �� - / I I - I 1- - \, 4 i I ),L - \ - I I " I 1\ - � / 11- I�z ,r� � ,( , -�, __ � I � 1� - 1 _'_ � - 11 , L; I ' 'OF ", —, I , i I----11" `- "I . � ____ I \ _ _ \ _<1 I a' 'Of ,--" 1. - , . i � !,�,, I � � I D \ ' \ ,\ \ \ 1,� `F,� I ______ - -SLO. A � �11 . � � / / I . ,_\ . � TO BE,�-RE V�_U "L\ -1, . \ I ; - -1 % � � -�_ 11 � � � � I ,,- i mmmmw"11 I --_ / ",_Z�,�.��_ I " L \ 1 I _x , I __�___11 � �_,� xz�� / , / * . ---"\,. I . � - . \ I \ \ I ,Q�_Cl A '. ,11 -------, , -7 -0 .1 - I �\ i �_,,� 1� I . I I - � � I , - 5 1, � � /': . - I I I I I . � , 54.'� L % � �,(& , I - I C I _1 I - ,: I � I .- - ,� � ,�� "__ �I I% ') I , - ", I I; I *. � // . . I I - � - , I I i ;� ,�,\ , � I �� ., , 1. 1- L, �, -,qz- Q = _ i 11 � " I 1 3. FRESHWATER WETLAND BOUNDARY AS FLAGGED / - ___ 1 29 1 1 j , I \ , Q) "� / ,_\ � � . I � ' / i X I ,\ \ � I I- , - _nl � � I i I , k � \ \ L a �� I � I .- I , � -I'll i -z -,-�� I .11 , ; ,<,� � / I . . � , 1, , V,�' 0 1/ � L, , __ � I I " P _____ __ , (n I � � t i -) � / I 1. \\ \ , . - - 0 4 �.\ / i :�' 1-4- \' -- I , -\'�S ,\ � - -- .1 �� " j .< � , , / 'I .d "5--' -:---I- I I I ,\\ I i ; \ I f- � -,,� "L� ' ,�- I I �� \ \\�\ \ // =__ - -.-- _ I'll, � � i ': � / / / : � IL I I I ! � \ "`,�\ � I to 0�6 ", I - CORP. AND APPROV I . - I , L" I -" L ' ��, / � ,,,, \1 �- -�l � \ � I AA / , - , , ,� -- � ==j � I I . , BY JEFFREY SEEMAN OF COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL i i I _� i � 1�,_ ", __I I , ,2 __ / i , , , � , � \\ ,� , __ I r" � � 1 -98. / I /'�" 28,I� /"11 � / I - � I ,"� � I -, I� � � / IL " L - f,T 4z�l 1 1 - / I I . / . 1 � �\, I ;,-L?ll I - - . h - If NE .J�_, �, 5113. -1.n .'' I � I I .1 L I I - I .. 11 . "-,� SEE SHEET No. 5 OF 13 . NOV. 24, 1998 �_�__ � 6 * AUG. 24, 1998 .�z,�'_� --I �c -g,f" MAY 19, 1998 ,I- = �1�� = 1,�11 SEPT. 17, 1997 - .E�S",� . - DATE : SEPT. 4, 1997 1,-_��E . $;,6�,' .41 SCALE :1" = 40' K F, - JOB NO. :97-290 ��s e-�I 1 3�'_'_�I I �j I L 'L S� SHEET NO. :7 OF 13 1 L - ____ I - __ I F I I . __ - - I - � ---- L - "970290SPF.DWG" OF 1,1 � ., � —.—,-----L-----'--- ___—�--,-—,-.-------'—-----L---'-—"---------�---—.�--- —,----,,—.,—----� .--._____-—_—_— —------ —'---—'-----L—'-----'L-�—"' -----,------------"---------L--------—"L—'—L'— ' -------------------_—_____,___-----------—L------—"—------- _______------,--�--L----------"---"- ---------'— _______ L --------------.----,--------------- ______ 7 —.--. _____.____—-------—--—-.----------,--------------"----------.--,--.—�-------,----,---------_—.------------L-----'L-------"----------------'----------------L—�—'L------— ---------"------------------------------,—,------.------,----------,-----__________ ------- _____ ---,.--------.—�--------.—,--.--"---—,_,._.____________--. I —__________________ ----------------,---_"__________,_____.. I I SEE SHEET NO. 2 OF 13 Young & Young, Land Surveyors H Fil" 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York f 190141N 516-727-2303N=4 Land Surveyor Howard R: Young, � 1 � Thomas C.Young, e } IIltlt Alden IF. P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) Kenneth F. Abruxxo, p rt, Professional Engineer \l John Schnurr, Land Surveyor L - j@lattning -� n Land Surveyor 0,ururgEng ! _ — �\ G a v II �\ � i _ rte,- • _I _. C.O. N0.8 ti LK �\ \ v:aL�< r xl� /GS NCRrTE GS — — ' GS � GSi \ \ 11 NEW 4 SANITARY _ - - \��' 1011 SEWER FORCE MAIN G —22 ?z Lj �AC PNL F4F � � aGKc 0 N .9 \ �' L } ' 4-a ,. L, =GS S \ 115T \' �` -rn - �G \ �'? GSi i '0 C GS 0 N 0 05 WS _ GS, \� ��), EIT GS VI`' 4 LL GS q U IL =o � ` C.O. 174 t N0.11 T `� 4" SDRt'8 I 49' OF I PVC PIPE / t4 � .-rte-- P A H _ C r t TJ. WS I rm T i 6 4� in WS Ul �\ Z -- 1 ;1 lm 1 1 m l m I 1 9E C' WS S • �I l TFR B FRI D LIFE CARE COMMUNITY SEWER MANHOLE #185 RIM= N PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD IE=8.89 N/E t • IE=7.29 E IE=7.29 S At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD N Suffolk County, New York q) Z Suff. Co. Tax Map: 1 1000 , 35 , 1 , 25 District Section Block Lot n� �N S1 TE PLAN rn I� NE W. y o� = o SEWER MANHOLE #184 t RIM4.2 66 SFD S IE=4.26 N k � 4S8 LA 1-- E ~ o� P NSW y _ E ONS -T o = n N/1 NOV. 24, 1998 LL� AUG. 24, 1998 DATE : JUNE 29, 1998 2 = SCALE :1" = 40' JOB NO. :97-290 ; OF SHEET NO. :8 OF 13 O s "970290SPF.OWG" 8 OF 13 0 SEE SHEET No. 2 OF 13 ° Young & Young, Land Surveyors .07k 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York If 90 f 1?LtTtLJ yL 516-727-2303 t31I3tLJ .2 Z Alden W. Young, RE & L.S. {1908-1990 � n wsl as 4`'` �ittttttttt Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor ThomC. Wolpert, Professional Engineer Kenneth F. Abruzxo, Land Surveyor John Sorr, Land Surveyor - �ttgtttPPrtttg ,. 1\\ �� `\ 1 C.O. N .8 u , r F-1 �,�,��,�• �� SGS Ali — — c� yG5 GS \ NEW 4 SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAI N 0 o 7, S� z z GS a � � _ b za g W ✓'f-! u. - � '� z P GMA A � O � - ZG N A, "I-Gs �� G x s —WS— — G5 O. N .10 WS 41, WS G5 'At \t GS GS \\ 3. a� , j , � �{ C. . \, N01 o � -i —WM I 49'� 4•• SDR18 w iI ' L.Q. N0.11 I _PVC PIPE ! O C A NA I / C ` C) i O T �WS _ rn .- l� io 1C: , i 1 m rrWS G — —7 - IDG I r a. T R LIFE CARE COMMUNITY SEWER MANHOLE #185 RIM=15.49 IE_8.89 N,E PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD IE=7.29 E IE=7.29 S At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD 'N Suffolk County, New York Z Suff. Co. Tax Map: 1000 35 1 1 1 25 -� District Section Block Lot SITE PLAN I-n NE SEWER MANHOLE #184 k RIM 4.2 6 6 `AFD IE=4.26 N f LAPD PA C C1. ®ONS CO /a O Jf. NA NOV. 24, 1998 . AUG. 24, 1998 0 fir= DATE : JUNE 29, 1998 2 SCALE : 1" = 40' z�< _ FO 614$5 JOB NO. : 97-290 a �' F SHEET N0. :8 OF 13 O qhs "970290SPF.0WG" OF 13 - -- -- Young 9& Young, Land Surveyors °^r p —-- - 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 f „ 516-727-2303 s n Q 1I Tt iJ Alden W. Young, RE & L.S. (1908-1994 Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor =< '� j Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer � i�uung • Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor John Schnurr, Land Surveyor Planning iEnginttring R $ncveyittg ~Y I S 13.46 3p» E Kling, Jr. w or formerly yd F 33.68' S 28'19'30" E -`5--------""- _�- n° "a--____ RIVE , ASPHALT D � -•-•""'"` 926.10 ASPHALT DRIVE �r S O \ �r \ E 4 e S 30'10 40 813.96' ---- 07. \ Or 3020, S03. �Orrner/y \ — --— 03 40' Flo r 'j• 100,Op E yQ� F 00 kln9, Jr 01, 10.1840" a�w \\ •\ r � `��, �,� 0,93, E S 0 10039, o; \ \ .7d E z? F z W�NY K _ 01, `' S 00" E `w �wca ? NOdQ �O V� \•\ \ K<W1 2� \•\ 434.1), formerly M. Dwight Ripley _ ; 07-0.2, now or formerly N; \\ \ 40. 19, 2 00" E John Abadiotakis & Christian Abadiotakis `s• \ ^ o o. GRANITE M O UMENT o FOUND I M o CHAIN LINK NCE , o I Z \ \ 805.00 - __ \ S 24'34 30 E - In aI I I i \ � / FOUNDATION Z i �Q I " m wMA _ I 1 _ 75.6'-- r7 z U- 2 STORY \\\\\\ ! FRAME HOUSE Oi J 1 j L � 1N M C*i Z � o W FOU / 1 N Oq nON 235 81 / S p\ \ i • N �2 2�� ,•� 3433sy\ \ f � � M >: ¢ . cr 6'\ 163.60 ' y, 35.5 '18 W I w\\\ TOTAL AREA = 144.7708 ACRES ;!` D - - — - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - POND - - - - -S 23'51'43" E - - - ��`- -iiJ - - - - - - - 1125.11' Z n 1 a Z J �. . _ S C E N I C EASEMENT \. JI 1 •. •. AS DESCRIBED IN DEED L. 9506 CP. 274 M \ r �� \ : �sl N j CD z \1 \\ 1 1 Z oo \�- '•\ WETLANDS � � .�\ rn 190. \ \ I \ / — P g.52�2i11� � \ OS�3 �\ \ /. / I \ / //AV � � \ ' HEDGE , " za � rn N 3 � 0) \\\ // \ ' i� i to0 N 11.3j, "' /h r \ 10' q n a \ / _ /mow PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT ��t� • 1 Z €`V S 1 Q 34.4p, e ' / �p0 AS DESCRIBED IN DEED L. 11712 CP. 663 tp (O w 30 0' Jerryw °S formerly i i ¢ Z 1 �\8�0 oo \ —� , /� _-�/ \ Fra H ch0field & _ '45" W `� �•._ � / CONCRETE �\ IN Frank Justin McIntosh I wN. ,/� 2. 4 BLOCK BUILDING —' o� ,�` I POND 4 Q -� I o TANK MANHASSET 4) 1 \ 1 a C� �w \ AVENUE WETLANDS I °a I 119'16' E L .—NS 19'16'00" E� z 4 M �N W \ / I COVER 21 — „—„ 550.15' ( � I z °CI I — a 10111 OF OF Ti O !_ — \ \ ` /'• ` ,/ Q�,-, = \ \ CID ,_ i _ .i \ rte.- -.,�'`� /amu' o I ER 19. em _— _ - -- _. —-cfr ONE NK . DRIVEWAY HOUS 676.89' T — p Z PERM I M S Q , �v AS UTILITY I J �� f� �� \\ 136, I j S DESCRIBED IN DEED L 11712 Cpl EASEMENT � z 0) a) I \\ N �\�. 76s '1 p '663 p ^ 'w O w I \ 250 TEST \`33' a) V' — \ j 30\" No A( FRAME ( l"'_cA'ME 07GREENHOUSE Ll 6 � N i 1I `0�0 1 4 Q m \ / °� F 11 I I FOUNDATION O n n SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION ¢ z L I I DRIVEWAY I I z Q 1 \ \ 411 �/ —__._� JI °'-I I w FRAME N O • WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO PECONIC LANDING AT f \mss' / // j� � r -- —`-'-- C Io GARAGE z 1 SOUTHOLD, INC., SUFFOLK COUNTY INDUSTRIAL CID LID - \ \ \qR , / / l Z 6 TITLE INSURANCE TRUST COMPANY COM ANY OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE AND J DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, BNP PARIBA5, CHICAGO / / � I 2STORY 282_____.________ Q � � STONE BUILDING COLLATERAL AGENT THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED IN V1 \ ` / I ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODE OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYS ADOPTED BY THE NEW YORK STATE ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL LAND b `�S• \.\ � I z � / / �, ._.,/�\ 1 � I Z SURVEYORS. /.--' - - ^ ORS \ \\\� �� I J •ti'�i/ / –" I NII I �� NEW4 co 00 Y CID Ln -7- CID / o '-__ 1 _ to `O S_23'23'20" E _ _ , 562.50' PER1V_i-�c 17—U-n - - - - - r- -- - - - - - z o �_' - / - - \ _ - -- --=U-n127Y A� MEN T— - _- oo-o \ I 1---� \ / `!'�- � _ �r __ =_�_` - _ _ HOWARD W. YOUNG, N. L.S. N0. 45893 !, O,PO� \ I ( / ,r r, I N 23'23 20' W \�\ __— f 592.50' 1 CAS 45893 I I04 zz I �I /� I REMAINS of • THIS CERTIFICATION IS BASED ON FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED IN 15- y O 1 /" I FRAME HOUSE APRIL 11, 1997. OC J / CVERHFAD U)"�,TY U':�_S _ a o5 <1 -'' r// I �- _o- — ' - z • CERTAIN BUILDING SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND THE FRAME COTTAGE ON THE PREMISES, NOW UTILIZED AS A MODEL, IS �•lS` I li I '�`- �J^ J \ /; I I Z I NOT SHOWN HEREON. tic ;`-�-- "' 14-5 CIO s NOTES: - 300.8' ! z : . \. � ! I I FRAME � > t � \ l '' //�� J�^ I SCENIC EASEMENT I SHED MONUMENT FOUND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED L. 9506 CP. 274 2. . = PIPE FOUND RUINS � (0 --"" FRAME STRUCTURE n I C3� 1 coQgUILD1NG I LIFE CARE COMMUNITY 1 i t � , • \\ ��` \� \i ly I , 415.7' LANDING AT SOUTHOLD 290•GG __________________________________._________ 882•g7, z PECONIC I to ` At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD O ��\ i a Suffolk County, New York •2810" o I +�� 5,g 1 32 Suff. Co. Tax Map: 1000 35 1 25 v I District Section stock Lot \ 344.28' 426.81 m 32.57120" w Re°Ity Co I BOUNDARY SURVEY Z \N now or formerly ,em 1�y Co NE .�L , CA w. o 505 36 er\y CO Y� pr ' O �O' w °C N q�'3g 00\14 1tiND F i II I NEItiY C7 W RECERTIF1ED : SEPT. 13, 2002 Z :FEB. 19, 1999 DATE : SEPT. 17, 1997 OFE$g10NP�' SCALE JOB N0. :97-290 � SHEET NO. :9 CF 13 I 1© '97085T.D WG" 91 __ . . . _. _, a _ I- -___ -- - - ------ -__- --- - i - - ------- ------ -- ----- - ---------- ------------- -------------------------------- - ------ ---- . --- - (O . Young & Young, Land Surveyors . . 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 8 516-727-2303 �oUT1� \\ \ 6 Howard W. Young, y Alden W. Young. P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) . goung Land Surveyor Thomas C. WolyDert, Professional Engineer Kenneth F. Abruzxo, Land Surveyor - ' John Sehnurr, Land Surveyor Manning nginerr4ng \ . Bururg,ng I ... �' , �\ , O\;I , N \, 1. \\ \ ,\ IJI ! � I �I = 8.37 -�\ =<, -- ;°�' \ ��%' `�\\ h! `\ �" i ,.\ r=�\ � _µ; .1 -',_, \ LEACHING SYSTEM B - _ - r,L! I ®O I \\ '� LEACHING SYSTEM "A" _ _- Q /.-.\ . I � � / r-\ /' i I I \ Q _y W I 9.33 ''iy j i` C' \\'"I / 24.00 _ -n I I I a� � '------- --_- / _``�----- ----- -,� �' \�-�� `-� \� \ u �) ! I S0 i„ ,I NCB N0. 8.01.1 ,o --- _ _ `. j � i I • _. ► T = 14.40 24.00' a,� r ` I �'�\ NCB N0. 7.01.1 � `-I I Co,\ ;�"`, ��-�'�-�� i I = 10.40 Q O ILL �oD � �I -- - �., I T = 13.50 \ _ _- I I , yr ` L I \ ��_ :, ' O / - 11 - ---�- D i ��o s 11 x / I = 9.50-- ! L! ^iI Lr rn NCB NO. 8.01.0 �� l �� i ° _j � I L -' K W '-o T = 14.40 ^ I �_', . ,=, 7 o �m I p ;v I - 10.10 N r :,u__ ( L �_ Z �' 3 s / - / tl) O l I \\L �- tJ i L O O `® \Q�' \ i `�-,_ i I 1 L-J I J L6 O Q / 14.18 14.18 lLII x r Y __� 13.88 1388 I ,a! I J r t' -i I = 14.88 14.88 _ lea �Qe ` !,. z,q < 14.48 14.48 a9 OF F 30.00 NCB N0. 7.01.0 r �� 1 _ Y r �1 �- "" REPLACE EXISTING PAVEMENT WITH NEW ASPHALT I I �i T = 13.50 ,1-15 ��I ��} PAVEMENT TO N.Y.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS 30' OF 18" HDPE -j-, 19.20 I �,� r - REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT WITH NEW ASPHALT I 30.00' -a W. ;} \r' - -. _ PAVEMENT TO N.Y.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS 30 OF 18 HDPE - - NEW STOP SIGN I } �I ® 1.0040-- l - � r✓� -� r- ll , " .;� I - _ �'"',,. r R=30.00''-' - - `` ^ _ ® 1_0040 NEW STOP BAR R1-1C ts.�1 1s.a'1 _ 1\L=47.13' ~�A ,,� o r,_-� ---- I -----" NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT TO / 1s.41 1x.41 I NEW STOP B NEW STOP SIGN _I 14. ITEM 688.01M 14.87 \_____________. RELOCATE EXISTING HYDRANT -`- i ----j ITEM 688.01M o `� `O R1-1C 14.87 14.37 N.Y.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS T \ t4s7 _ _TO NEW SNOW STORAGE STRIP ..1,�_-...,,��-�.--�- NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT TO '�� R=30.00' R=30.00' _ �- � „, I ------------- - - ---- ----- ------ T - 11 �' - - __ _ T - j ww �.w N.Y.S.D.O.T. SPECIFlCATIONS�� µL=47.13' L=47.13' _ 1 1 j 1 I I J , I I % 18.59 ' f�.26 i l i,,111 --(Ie_ --'--+--r-._-- -+-- _ _-I--�-- -- _ - - - ti,. .� _____----;,:11 ,, 13.07 �1z.74 + 11 „ -' ��: y 1,;, _ - p�" .n ,'j_", = a' �j - -4 t4.7B - 3 - 25.00 f .f7 ce' _ 1 s.e7 14x8 L 4i. ., ;: NY RA T ;- j' "D RANT , - - ;WM �z7I,=. ,, __ .- -- - - I- ------- -- 'WNt. - - - -- - _, f . 6 3.48 E3 .- - 3 4 r/ 1 !3 no f' !'' 3 4 r o.. 1 @.58 J /,. _�..3 / 0Iff % 2 5.Q0 �'. o --�,---4 �----- - z.as 7 l f. ;' 25 1 3 _ _ t - _._ 1z. a t 4.s4 t t 1 iI "I, 12 "`} 11 i 14.14 •58 .j- ee O •�%^ 1z 1 %i% 1 `/ 4.30 f 1 �`,.:....:...I ( ,...-. rte. `� ue'!�/w,awnF.fAn,.n` .+aww.a�a�.w.�lwe. � 1/ ,,l ... M �1. \\- EDGE OF TRAVELLED LAN - - _ -- r- " `r - -' ,_ t , _ b EDGE OF TRAVELLED LAN , o 11.00 - .,�_` _ O I - -M--e4Q�.-I-N-- - -R -0-A- 0 -- -l'-SJ-.;-- -Y-. -S-; - -( ROU- -T-E- - --2-5-) -- - - - - - -- - - -i-it,cIm _, : , ;f - -M-A- , f-_-N_ _-L_..- 0 _>200'� NYT - - - .___ _ _ - _ _ _ I ; ..�..�..._�,...+..,.-�,... �,-...;•.�.� . - ... _..._.,.-..-.,-...:a.-.... ...............,_. C:`1 i..it >�.i; !: �.I R i._ I L 2 F c I.Ii. /- i^ i" i. 11 Ii'' 7 :dv1 L '= A I .1r; �, ,. ,, --- - /rr / '/ I - t. r^' �.^ '' I - - - - - - - - - -I- - - - - - GM - - - - - - - - - - - NEW STOP BAR r'- - - - - GM - - - - - - - - ✓ -; - - - - - - - - :�� __ ---__-- ___- - -----�- ---- _ -- -- _ - - - - -�r REMOVE EXISTING • _ -- - --"----- - ___------------ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ PAINTED LINES ITEM 688.01M - I `I - \ - _ - s -,r_ . - - _ - _ -• - _ - - - . _ - - __ - - _ _ - - -- - - - - - _ _� - _ -Ji ,--T=, __ REPLACE EXISTING PAVEMENT WITH-VFW ASISRXI.T------ ` . I , r I _ ' PAVEMENT TO KY.S.D.O.T.,'SPECIFICATIONS 7F ` 10 \ -------------.---- //'/ _ ------------ ---------- - V ' , --- - . I I - - - ( � _- 1 Lf-S, F''_J E WEST INTERSECTION DETAIL EAST INTERSECTION DETAIL z SCALE: 1 "=20' SCALE: 1 "=20' , \ . \ _ \ \ ._ _ slop NO END SHOULDER A ROAD WORK \ ' \ ' - \ \ ,, \ / / -r \ �,� I , ; I i BEGIN NEW CONCR TE CURB Z^� I ;� \ >� ,, I /� j �r� fy i I S I - \\ _ '/ I - I - k Y / / / - mi I �, a \ , f /, 1 / `^,<5--�/7� -_i �"f'•�- ( /// `` \ C u��z I SI<:,i1LDER T�3 BE PAGED TO ` \\ s�, /I \, i "--- • � I i S•. O \\ _ - <�t _w I { \ / - y N.Y.S.D.O SIPECIFlCATIONS (' ,`-� / / 'Irzt I / a \ ---- I SIZE & LOCATION OF PARCEL I \\`,_�'� END NEW CONCRETE CURB i Q I ! � r�- ': ,\�,',. 'rte ;.�' ,' / ,? ti , y SPF `= i i I - - \" .0 BE AQUIRED BY GREENPORT / \ RELOCATE EXISIIh'c� N�'DRANT -,-- // - 1 ► ) J A _ - _ I FIRE DISTRICT IS APPROXIMATE. I D ac z 11, �' EXISTING CURB INLET TO BE REMOVED , 0 j -�\ - TO NEW SNOW STORAGE STRIP ' ` `_ 1 ! I � y �, I / 1 -" r 'rte' �1 \ /i I 1, // ' `l.0 r 4 I I 'r I Q _ REPLACE WITH STATE APPROVED I V/ I v .� l - - •t\ NEW CONCRETE SIDEW/.. i \ _ r 1 ► ' 3 - I �- \ j (GEE T EXISTING - I \-___ _✓- - fCUSH'GRATE �I - .- I _ - ,J I CURB RAMP TYPE A 1 /a ,/� i I ��' ,4 11_________ _ I SOLID WHITE LINE ?✓ REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB - RELOCATE EXISTING HYDRANT / o�� I - i I ��, `��, ' 4� rte- _ / \ I I / I\ I , / / / /'U_ �' J GAS �r3' �J= ,' I t / I _ 70 -�} ' TO NEW SNOW-STORAGE STRIP/ '� " I ;_I♦\� ,l I � . I // - - - --- / / , - � i r �" I rl o EXISTING CURB INLET TO BE OVED j / I �/ �.. + a I - C / I 1,1 _ -,,_ - I I - ---' �% X0111 ', I] �; � 1y,� r t z'' - � i // // ,r_ FLUSHCGR I STATE APPROVEID / i1 � �3 \ NEW 5 CONCRE .SIflEV1rALK 2 �xi s / �? METER j / -� �i -,'I '_-- I (. / TO N.Y.S. SPECIFICATIONS �/ I I l y� " �. / �. /i / / W �� T/ t REMOVE EXISTING CONCRE CURB �D O-T: �� \ c-�"/ p� - 1 , ' / (,.., r -2 \ '.I j f `__./ I p iii !i - I �� L�s7: �, ( j�f l ' / 1 i! 1 M WATER ;i ti:' y ,O _ Q •.1- //. t I I / , I �. ---_ /' NEW CONCRE_T_E_CURB--- l J ��'--" _� _ / /- �- - , I i i' y ,METER �^��' cam- _ 50 30.00'- ' - __ - .; - /_� -- ( - f� as _. yj �;s_.,�` y ^._ i , i I „( : _ _ i _ �__-� waw I ..-.. �- _ _= `".r-o.,..-.a- F --- __-'-'- '_--,�_ _ i ,. V •`C4� C -----" - - -- �` I -- - t` f-- �'' -l+ '` 1v i 'i - 1 - � C _- + 1 1� 1 _- __ - ------------ ------ _- - , ------ - - -i H BRANS._ \,L �: µHYDRANT ------- - - - - - - - - -L T WM -- - - -- - -- - - - - - - - ----- --- \ �«,` 1 - - - - - o Young & Young, Land Surveyors ;7- �� o . 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York I f,01 516-727-2303 `" ' GEES IIriri� Howard W. Young, y _ Alden W. Young, P.E & L.S. (1908-1994) Land Surveyor Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer �IIriri� b Kenneth F. A6ruzzo, Land Surveyor John Schnurr, Land Surveyor I Manning Engineering giururging 'I y --20.00' 10.00' 8'x2"x10" T&G SHEETING FINISHED GRADE 90' P� 6"x8" WALE TOP OF DAM=15.00 \ \\ \\/j TOP OF DAM=15.00 \\i\\\\\\ — STORM HIGH WATER // WATER SURFACE � o EL=14.00 EL=12.00 jWEIR CREST EL=12.00 = ---_ Go /\/\ % r/ / // // / //\\//\/\\/\\/\ / /\\%\\%�\�/\\\/\\\% o To SOIL ,' j °0 2'-3' STONE //j//j//j//j//j/// / / / / / / / r \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\' WATER SURFACE 2' COMPACTED TOPSOIL %/% EL=9.00 / / / / / r" / / / / /, `//\//\`// // / // // ✓/ / / / / / -- _ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ /\/\/\/\/ o (BENTONITE ENHANCED TO ACHIEVE PERMEABILTY, K=1X10-" c) / �f \/'\/\/\/ \ \ \ \�\\r \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \i/ /�' ---- ---- � x� � --- -==__- FILTER FABRIC \-8'x2"xlO" T&G SHEETING \/x\/�rx/ \/\\ 2'-3' STONE HEADWALL 2'-3' STONE DRAINAGE i� WATER SUFACE SECTION 13-13 - SECTION A—A NEW POND --- \\ \\ \\ \\\\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ %/% %!%/%/��!/��/%/' LL =j _ _ j\ BOTTOM ----------------- _ __: - COMPACTED SUB--SOIL B WEIR CREST t C '2 .S TREA�A.'...;. - 12 TIMBER SHEETING ROCK CAP ... TIMBER SHEETING 1313- - - - - - -- - POND SECTION 8c HEADWALL 14 — 14 — — — —I — —15 6.00 10.00' I 4.00' 15 I A A I � 2'- 3' STONE CD O FINISHED GRADE O 3± 15 15 71 — HWM EL=12.1014 `.fir\\:\�� c, '.\' /••�:;,% \. '\' �/. .;vf`.\.\\\ ''\`,i .r} ._, ,i .r� 6' RAINFALL _ FILTER FABRIC — ..`." .'. 12 _ 6„x8„ WALE 1z , - 8'x2"x10' T&G SHEETING ... ROCK CAP I . ..'' -71 ... ' C 10- :..S.TR.E'AM.-.-.-.- ,0 NOTES ................ 1. ALL TIMBER TO BE CCA PRESSURE TREATED. 9 2. ALL FASTENERS SHALL BE GALVANIZED. B ° 4 CONCRETE CAP I SECTION C—C it PLAN ` WEIR FIN. GRADE EARTHEN 8k ROCK • I WALL N0. 1 2 3 4 9 10 11 12 13 V • "0" - MAX. s=18" h, (ft) 10 10 8 8 9 8 8 8 12 A (in) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 14 Z C (in) 81 81 63 63 38 32 32 32 94 W (in) 120 120 96 96 62 56 56 56 144 • 0 #6®13" #6013" #5018" #5018" #4®11" #4014" #4®14" #4014" #609" y D #4013" #4®13" #4018" #4018" #4®11" #4014" #4014" #4014" #409" LB 6-#5 6-#5 6-#5 6-#5 5-#4 4-#4 4-#4 4-#4 7-#7 FIN. GRADE LW #5013" #5013" #4018" #4018" 1 #4011" #4014" #4®14" #4014" #509" \\i\ /\\\/\\\/\ \ \\%/\\/ • L w #5®12" #5012" #5®12" #5®12" #5®12" #5@12" #5012" #5®12" #6®12" \ \\///\\�\\//\\//\\ `• 3 I • ' I � I NOTES "' D • 1. FINISHED SURFACE OF RETAINING WALLS MAY BE CONCRETE FORMLINER P PATTERN OR MASONRY VENEER. I 2. ELIMINATE FINISHED SURFACE AND CONCRETE CAP FOR RETAINING C WALLS NUMBERED 5 THROUGH 13. • N 3" L I E, B LB i 72.00' - - W WALL FINISHED ROAD CENTERLINE GRADE CONCRETE CAP CONCRETE RETAINING WALL _=_ `. FINISHED GRADEit ,I II 1 + III I!i I� j I.' 'i' I I I, I II II I i II I I i'I II' it III •u I II ;i II IL I' - - ,I� •I .jl I t I 'i I I I I I - I I I I I II i I \ I \ I. / \ \ \ \ I \ / I / I I I \ \ i \ _ ! I I \ II I I \ r / \ I I / \ \/\/\/\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ � ::�:a;.: ,•:.,, , , I , II I I'. I j ,! I,,, I. II II I I; II � \, 1 ,� P I' -.. I I I ;, , ,I I, I j I .,.� ,/\/\/\/\/\, ,/\/\/\/\/� /\\j\\j\\j\/\/\/\/\/\/\/� `-- �..:�;, ' ,•:„ ;1 ly v , � II I; •. !� � I !, a \ !I I I I, li. II! :,,.r,.;+ •,+ '!;y // // // // // i+ //\//\//\//./ \ \/\\/�\ \// `�.•`:�:,-�,; ,,,, II I I I 'I ,,, h � f I i; 'i /�' � I,I , I /' \�? I ,: !I ! I;'. ,:y::�-y -- �\ \\ \\ \\\\\\\ \. \ x/0\j\\j\ ` =++' I 1 / , '; �li I /% a I� 1 LIMIT OF CONCRETE FORMLINER Il I OR MASONRY VENEER /\\/%/%%\/%\�- - - - - - - - ,,,.,�+•'' ; fir( \��:', ! I l�� ,' I1r;, L — — — — — — — -'-� I In;i I.i i,l;II°��I // ;•; N;•I t, .. I� +i� � 7\T\ ,y'i;jl;,.• \ G;I IRi; :);1 I I s I \//\\//\\//\\//i /i / I— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J L( F E CARE C O M M U N ( TY \i\\i\\i\\i\\i //i/i r r FOOTING /\\j\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ rJ<r�i�i�rlcrT�/`�7`r7`rT`�r7T'7`rl��// / / 7j�7j�Tj \fi �� fi �� //\\/\\ \/\/\ / PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD \\/i\\/i\\/i\\/i\\/i /i\\/i\\//\\/i\\ /\\ \\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\ � ��i�\�i�\�i��i�\� \ �/i\�/i\�/i\\ \/ii\�/��/i\��//\\�/�\��/// i\/i ;�;�\��\�;�\�`�/// \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York \ �\/�\irk\ir\\i�\r`\ \\,�\r�\r�\•\\ TWIN PIPE ARCH - - CONTECH "MULTI-PLATE" 7'-11" SPAN, 5'-7" RISE IE = 11.00 Suff. Co. Tax Map: 1000 , 35 1 25 District Section Block Lot it • - - - 23.00' —13.00' 23.00' ROAD & DRAINAGE DETAILS W. �yo 74 CULVERT 8c WALL_ �i, 45893 S�LAt�sv� NE�'f�- �P 0� NOV. 24, 1998 -__-- DATE OCT. 23, 1998 - 61483 t` SCALE :N.T.S. P�. JOB NO. :97-290 F ESS1�N SHEET NO. :11 OF 13 �= I 97290DET 1 OF 1 I o 1 \ Qi 9 Young & Young, Land Surveyors LL=a �o 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 516-727-2303 JW Alden W. Young, P.E & L.S. (1908-1994)Howard W. x' a IIuizg Thomas C. WolpertYoung, Proral E gineer J 2s Kenneth F. Abruzzo, Land Surveyor John Schnurr, an Surveyor Manning gngintering - furutging C- - - - - - - - C � - - - � 7[: TO BE TRIMMED SO THAT A HEIGHT OF TREES TO BE TRIMMED SO THAT A HEIGHT OF I 14' ABOVE LANE WIDTH IS CLEARED 14' ABOVE ROAD WIDTH IS CLEARED 8.00' 12.00' TWO-WAY TRAFFIC 12.00' TWO-WAY TRAFFIC 8.00' 10.00' 10.00' 8.00' ONE-WAY TRAFFIC 8.00' ONE-WAY TRAFFIC 1.00' 1.00' FINISHED GRADE 4" TOPSOIL - 1 \\\ 6.00' t CROWN 3 (MAX.) 2.00% \..</%/./i,/� �\ \ �•//\/\ r_ 2.00 ° 1/4" I 2" ASPHALT PAVEMENT \ �\� EARTHEN PEDESTRIAN PATH 3" TOPSOIL & SEED 4� RECYCLED CONCRETE NOTE: 6 STABILIZED SOIL BASE 6' STABILIZED SOIL BASE ALL PEDESTRIAN PATHS TO BE ENHANCED WITH r SPRAY-ON "POLY-PAVEMENT" SOIL SOLIDIFIER ,W ROAD SECTION FIRE LANE =_ I I i ALLOW 3" FOR FINAL C.I. FRAME & COVER - CAMPBELL ADJUSTMENT OF FRAME FOUNDRY PATTERN NO. 1007C, OR EQUAL. (ON INSPECTION POOLS ONLY) FINISHED GRADE WHATLEY-104 SERIES JEFFERSON LAMP, OR APPROVED EQUAL. GROUT AROUND 100° ENTIRE PIPELl ' DRAINAGE PIPE - NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT E T WHATLEY 104 SERIES JEFFERSON POLE, FINISHED GRADE OR APPROVED EQUAL. Li W REINFORCED PRECAST CONCRETE 4.00' I 2.00' o LEACHING RINGS TO TEST 4000 PSI n AT 28 DAYS. WHATLEY-101 SERIES NORFOLK BASE, (� jC\\jC\jCC C/\C\j/\\jj\\jC IIII OR APPROVED EQUAL. D❑EjI - • 0 a 0.67' °. 10.00' DIA. CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1=III=ITI—III=�=III= I—III III= 1= III=III=III=III=III= 0 6"x 6" WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT N ° Z DIRECTBURY - -CONCRETE HEADER 2.50' CONCRETE BASE i 71 STORM WATER LEACH , SIG POOL CONCRETE HEADER WALK PEDESTRIAN LIGHT I _ 5/8"0 REBARS-4" O.C. 5/8"0 REBARS-4" O.C. 00 0 00 ocoCDC) I moo I I ooo oo�o I o000o I � II o000o I I I - L - - - - J I L �— r L — — — — — — -I L- - - - - - - - #6 BARS AT 6" O.C. 4 CO' 4 00' PLAN PLAN PLAN 5/8"0 REBARS-4" O.C. CAST IRON CURB INLET 5/8"0 REBARS-4" O.C. CAST IRON CURB INLET CAMPBELL FOUNDRY, PAT. NO. 3450 CAMPBELL FOUNDRY, PAT. NO. 3407 C.I. FRAME COVER- CAMPBELL a F 11SHED GRADE o FINISHED GRADE & s` FOUNDRY PATTERN NO. 1007C, l OR EQUAL. - iA 3" FOR FINAL 1 � ALLC'N 3" FOR FINAL F TMENT OF FRAME ° ° ; AD,1IJSTMENT OF FRAME ALLOW 3" FOR FINAL b " ADJSTMENT OF FRAME 4`MIN a F RECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE e PK,CAST REINFORCED CONCRETE e I— WIRE FAEIRIC CONCRETE g TRAFFIC TOP o TRAFFIC TOP i N N REINFORCEMENT 0.12"/L.F. W i PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX \ i PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX C 1 C T I CLASS A CONCRETE INVERT SHALL GALVANIZED STEPS GALVANIZED STEPS " GALVANIZED STEPS BE CAST IN PLACE IN THE FIELD. LIFE CARE COMMUNITY PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE PR_CAST REINFORCED CONCRETE PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOTTOM SLAB W/ SUMP B:=rr:, c' ,AB W/ SUMP BOTTOM SLAB P NOTES 1 so' NOTES PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD �— 1. WALL REINFORCEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO A 1. WALL REINFORCEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO A At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD DEPTH OF 9'-0". o DEPTH OF W-0". 0 2. DEPTHS GREATER THAN 9'-0" SHALL HAVE WIRE o 2. DEPTHS GREATER THAN 9'-0" SHALL HAVE WIRE Suffolk County, New York FABRIC CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT 3"02", 1 AND 2 FABRIC CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT 3"02", 1 AND 2 I MIN. VERTICAL WIRES - 12" O.C., 1/2" MIN. COVER. MIN. VERTICAL WIRES - 12" O.C., 1/2" MIN. COVER. 3. STEPS REQUIRED WHEN DEPTH EXCEEDS 7'-0". 3. STEPS REQUIRED WHEN DEPTH EXCEEDS 7'-0". SECTION 4. ALL CONCRETE TO BE 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. SECTION 4. A.;. CONCRETE TO BE 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. SECTION Suff. Co. Tax Map: 1000 1 35 1 1 1 25 Distr ct Section Block Lot I ROAD & DRAINAGE DETAILS I i C NEW y CATCH BASIN - 2x2 FLUSH GRATE — CATCH BASIN - 2x-4 FLUSH GRATE STORM WATER MANHOLE 5 -J I I pF NEIL, I ol I � NOV. 24, 1998 __- _ DATE : OCT. 23, 1998 = _- 61483 SCALE :N.T.S. �FESSIONP� JOB NO. :97-290 <= O SHEET NO. :12 OF 13 O e _ 97290DET12 OF 13 PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 December 5, 2000 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Chades Cuddy, Esq. P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Cuddy: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 4, 2000: WHEREAS, the site plan for Peconic Landing that was conditionally approved on August 31, 1998, substitutes for and is in place of a previously approved conditional plan for 350 condominium units, known as the Breakers at Lands End which is now extinguished; and WHEREAS, all conditions of the conditionally approved plan for Peconic Landing (August 31, 1998) have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys, dated November 24, 1998, with Suffolk County Department of Health approval stamp and easement revision of September 6, 2000. Conditional final approval was granted on August 31, 1998. All conditions have been fulfilled as of this date, December 4, 2000. Enclosed please find two copies of the approved plan; one for your records and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for a Building Permit. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. ~VVery truly yours, /? n Orlows i, Jr. ~/ Chairman Cc: Building Dept., Tax Assessors PLANNING BOARD ~EMBER~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 1, 1998 Terence G. Lewis, Sr. U.S. Retirement Communities 101 Chesley Dr. Media, PA 19063-1761 Rez Proposed amended site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lewis: The following took place at a special meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 31, 1998: WHEREAS, Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. are the contract vendees of the property known and designated as Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., located on Rt. 25 in Greenport, SCTM# 1000-35-1-25; and WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was submitted on September 18, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Conditioned Negative Declaration on August 10, 1998; and WHEREAS, this approval is for the construction of 118 single family detached cottages; 132 apartment units; 24 unit assisted living center; and 32 bed skilled care center with supporting amenities; and WHEREAS, when all conditions are met and the Chairman endorses the final surveys the previously approved site plan for a 350 unit condominium known as the Breakers at Lands End will be withdrawn; and Page2 Proposed amended site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. September 1, 1998 WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated August 24, 1998 and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final set of surveys subject to fulfillment of the following conditions. All conditions and all required elements of a revised site plan must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution, or this conditional approval shall be null and void: 1. Certification by the Building Inspector. Review by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. 3. Review by the Architectural Review Committee. 4. Curb cut permit. 5. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation permit. 6. Archeological survey 1-B Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY l 1901 CHARLES R. CUDDY ATTORNEY AT L AW 445 GRIFFING AVENUE R1VERHEAD, NEW YORK TEL: (631)369-8200 FAX: (631)369-9080 E-maih crcuddy@earthhnk.net December 12, 2000 Mr. Robert Kassner Site Plan Coordinator Planning Department Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconio Landing at Southold, Inc. Dear Mr. Kassner: Enclosed is a copy of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions regarding Peconic Landing which has been recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk on December 7, 2000 at Liber 012088 Page 979. CRC:ms Enclosure Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy 2000 ' Number of pages TORRENS Serial # Certificate # Prior Ctf. # Deed / Mortgage Instrument Page / Filing Fee Handling TP-584 Notation EA-52 17 (County) EA-5217 (State) Comm. of Ed. 5 GO Affidavit Certified Copy Reg. Copy Other __ Sub Total Deed / Mortgage Tax Stamp FEES Sub Total GRAND TOTAL Real Property Tax Service Agency Verification Dist. Section B lock Lot 1000 035.00 O1.00 025.000 Recording / Filing Stamps Mortgage Amt. I. Basic Tax 2. Additional Tax Sub Total Spec./Assit. 0~' Spec./Add. TOT. MTG. TAX Dual Town__ Dual County__ Ileld for Apportionment __ Transfer Tax Mansion Tax The property covered by this mortgage is or will be improved by a one or two family dwelling only. YES orNO If NO, see appropriate tax claase on page # __ of this instrument. Comtnunity Preservation Fund Consideration Amount $ CPF Tax Due $ Improved Satishctions/Discharges/ReleasesListPropeflyOwnersMailingAddress RECORD & RETURN TO: Charles R. Cuddy,Esq. 445 Griffing Avenue P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 TD TD TD [ S [ Title Company Information [~o. Name [~itie # Suffolk County Recording & Endorsement Page This page fonns part ofthe attached Covenants and Restr_i~tions (SPECIFY TYPE OF INSTRUMENT) Peconic Landin9 a~ Southold~ Inc. Thepremiseshereinissituatedin SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. made by: TO In the 'Fownship of Southold In the VILLAGE or IIAMLET of Grcenpert BOXES 5 THRU 9 MUST BlS I~'I'ED OR PRINTED IN BLACK INK ONLY PRIOR TO RECORDING OR FILING. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS This Declaration made and dated the. ~ ~ day ot*~, 2000, by PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC., with an office at Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, hereinafter referred to as the "Declarant". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. is the owner in fee simple of certain lands located on the northerly side of New York State Route 25, Greanport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 035.00, Block 01.00, Lot 025.000, and more particularly described on the annexed Schedule A; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of said approval, the owner has deemed it necessary, for the best interests of the Town of Southold, the owner, and the interests of the surrounding community, that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said parcel, and that the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office. NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarant for the purpose of carrying out the intents above-expressed does hereby make known, admit, publisix, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereinafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon ail purchasers and holders of said premises, its successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That the Declarant will preserve and maintain the external design of the structures known as Brecknock Hall, the existing barn, adjacent garage and greenhouse which are located on the property described in Schedule A. Page 1 of 4 2. That Declarant's efforts to preserve and maintain the character of the present structures will not preclude exterior or interior renovation to provide for the safe and efficient use of the structures. 3. That any substantial proposed change in the exterior design of the structures shall be subject to approval by the Southold Town Architectural Review Board. 4. That the use of Brecknock Hall, the existing barn, adjacent garage and greenhouse shall be determined only by the Declarant, its successors and assigns. 5. That the within Declaration can be modified only at the request of the owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold a~er a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing, but their consent to such modification shall not be required. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant above-named has executed the foregoing Declaration the day and year first above-written. PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. 'STATE OF NEW YORK C~ OUNTY OF SUFFOLK William G? Thompson~, President SS: I EDWARD p. ROMAINE, CLE OF THE STATE OF RK OF THE COUNT DO HER NEW YORK IN AND Y OF SUFFOLK A EBY CERTIFY TH FOR SAID COUN ND CLERK OF TH . DEED LISER .,~ .~, ,J ~,A~ I HAVE COMPAR=r, .,. .... !'~Y (SAID COURT S~..,,-, - ~E_SUPREME COURT AND THAT IT i~ AT PAGE ~-~ ~:AN_N_EXEDCOPy '-"'~'(';OURTOFRECO - S .. ~,,.,oT ~ ? OF RD ~"~AVION AND OF THE WHOLE IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND COUNTY AND COURT THIS ~ f~ DAY OF./~_(~,~t ~,AND AFFIXFD THE SEAL OF SAID SCHEDULEA All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a granite monument found on the no[therly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) at the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of John Abadiotakis and Christian Abadiotakis, formerly of ri. Dwight Ripley, being the southeasterly corner of the premises herein described: RUNNING THENCE from said point of beginning South 66 degrees 01 minutes 20 seconds West along the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25), 634.76 feet to a monument found and land now or formerly of Jerry H. Schofield and Frank Justin Mclntosh; THENCE along land now or formerly of Jerry H. Schofield and Frank Justin McIntosh the following four (4) courses and distances: 1) North 11 degrees 31 minutes 10 seconds West, 210.00 feet; 2) North 19 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West, 344.00 feet; 3) South 65 degrees 47 minutes 10 seconds West, 213.37 feet; 4) South 19 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds East, 550.15 feet to the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25); THENCE along the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) the following two (2) courses and distances: 1) South 65 degrees 23 minutes 50 seconds West, 285.49 feet; 2) South 66 degrees 36 minutes 40 seconds West, 589.52 feet to land now or formerly of JEM Realty Co.; THENCE along land now or formerly of JEM Realty Co. the following four (4) courses and distances: 1) North 41 degrees 39 minutes 10 seconds West, 1084.54 feet; 2) North 65 degrees 07 minutes 50 seconds East, 376.40 feet; 3) North 32 degrees 29 minutes 10 seconds West, 982.87 feet; 4) North 32 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West, 426.81 feet to the approximate high water mark of Long lsland Sound; THENCE along the approximate high water mark of Long Island Sound the following fourteen (14) tie-line courses and distances: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) North 55 degrees 13 minutes 20 North 40 degrees 13 minutes 18 North 48 degrees 59 minutes 18 North 53 degrees 12 minutes 47 North 33 degrees 06 minutes 38 North 25 degrees 04 minutes 36 North 49 degrees 30 minutes 59 North 64 degrees 30 minutes 21 North 55 degrees 49 minutes 13 seconds East, 41.44 feet; seconds East, 162.82 feet; seconds East, 156.47 feet; seconds East, 85.49 feet; seconds East, 156.54 feet; seconds East, 352.41 feet; seconds East, 81.53 feet; seconds East, 163.50 feet; seconds East, 172.29 feet; Page 3 of 4 10) North 65 degrees 46 minutes 13 seconds East, 154.46 feet; 11) North 45 degrees 07 minutes 11 seconds East, 135.34 feet; 12) North 55 degrees 35 minutes 02 seconds East, 214.28 feet; 13) North 45 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East, 362.94 feet; 14) North 27 degrees 45 minutes 52 seconds East, 504.31 feet to land now or formerly of Floyd F. King., Jr.; THENCE along land now or formerly of Floyd F. King, Jr. the following fourteen (14) courses and distances: 1) South 30 degrees 10 minutes 40 2) South 31 degrees 03 minutes 40 3) South 28 degrees 19 minutes 30 4) South 13 degrees 46 minutes 30 5) South 27 degrees 56 minutes 50 6) South 00 degrees 19 minutes 40 7) South 01 degrees 34 minutes 00 8) South 03 degrees 40 minutes 00 9) South 00 degrees 04 minutes 20 10) South 05 degrees 18 minutes 40 11) South 00 degrees 39 minutes 30 12) South 01 degrees 45 minutes 00 13) South 07 degrees 02 minutes 00 14) South 76 degrees 49 minutes 10 seconds East, 926.10 feet; seconds East, 300.01 feet; seconds East, 89.61 feet; seconds East, 33.68 feet; seconds West, 65.47 feet; seconds East, 179.94 feet; seconds East, 300.20 feet; seconds East, 100.00 feet; seconds West, 172.71 feet; seconds East, 100.93 feet; seconds East, 100.15 feet; seconds East, 434.17 feet; seconds East, 40.19 feet; seconds West, 155.11 feet; THENCE still along land now or formerly of Floyd F. King, Jr. and along land now or formerly of John Abadiotakis and Christian Abadiotakis, South 24 degrees 34 minutes 30 seconds East, 805.00 feet to the northerly side of Main Road (NYS route 25), the point or place of BEGINNING. Page 4 of 4 ;;~.GOflDED ~ ~quLre ~, ~tl~ 247 og ~e Jfleludi~ ~g, my ac~ire ~ f~ deoeri~ In ~ule A, plots, pieces o, p&rcels of land as set forth end describ~d ~.,~. shell sand, gravel or other miser&ts be storod ~ the use. herein p~rmltted, ·nd to do ·~l ·uoh ~hlngl thereon, not expreofly forbidden her·i'm, (d) All right, interests and privilege~ Of the Greutor iff the pr·silts uot herein Ipeoificllly · refit·d, transferred and conveyed, rennin /nd re·id· with -4- inm'olved and shall not be dee~ to limit the continuing into account and limited by the £altrictio~l {Iqt(med by thil IC~lC Miwnt, ill in ~cco~{~ce with {~te o~ I~ {o~k ~., I. Thin ~re~nt .hall ~ ~tu~l U4 Ikll k i ~1~ ~t r~ning v/th the l~d ~d Ih-U. ~ ~i~ ~ ~e North Road (State Route 25)I runnln9 thence alo~j the corner o£ t~o pretlfnN being deNerlbed berel~ ~int ii dli~in~ the foll~J~ Novon ~r~o corMr ~ h~ of J~ ~lty Co~ BRBCKIIO~C /d I~OC IA'I'~ On th~ /~ d~y or ,g~,Y..a,~4a",f, 19S3, before me perooflally ovorn, did depose end ooy thor he reoidel it~. .. Iold, Mgtlilud~'; N~ YoFkj thit he La ~ I~rVll~ of the I: ~ ~ S~, the ~ici~l ~r~et/M ~i~ in ~ '~ ~ich ~ut~ the for~ol~ inot~tl ~t ~ the seol of seid mnicl~l ~reei~ ~et b mi ~fitd b This Agreement made this 26Lb day of April, 2000, by and between the VILL~E ©F GREENPORT, ~ tm~.Icipa!, corporation havin~j its office and p~incipal place of busi;less at 2~6 Third Streeg~ Crsenport, New York I19~4, herminafter called the "VILLAGE", and PECO~%'i.C L~,~IDIMG -~kT SCUTH'DLD, !NC., a :~ew York Corporation, %~ith offi. ce and principal plaoe of business at Route 2~, $outh[-~d, New York llg'~k, here:inaftar c,~]Led the "0WI~ER..~ WITNE$ SET~.H WHEREA~, r. tla ':OW,~.~ER. is abou: to censtruct a Life Care Cc~%q~n'~ity Project known as '~PECONIC L~4E',ING~' on its wh:ich it presei%tZy owns, located on the nortkerly sid~ of Route 25, w~:ick is more p&rticularly described in So~ledule "k" hereto annexed; sai~ da~dr~.be:~ propergy is Cot the cons%ruction oi 118 cottages for single family occupancy, 132 apartments in a 2~ story buildinw, 4g beds i~'~ a skilled nursing unit, 26 assisted /ivmng ~nzts and a single buildin~ co~zli~y oen~eI', WHEREAS, said ~'O~ER" represents ~hat the SUFFOLK CO~'i'Y WATER AUTHOR~q~ shall, furnish all of the water supply needs for ~he afc~resai~ project; and WHEREA$~ sale1 "G~ER',, at its sole cost and expense, con~*~z~ct on its premises sewa,~e mains and sewage coli. ection lift sta~ion($~, on c~rtain ri~h~-of~.way and portions of th& as gener~i]y sho,~)~ ~p~ report c~ ~YLOR ENGINEERING dated June provide zhat the Fc~rce Main would: be made o~ a four inch diameter ductile iron pipe, and in conformity wi~.h plans and spec£fications which are ttz be approved by the "V~LLAGE", and as ~nay He amended ffrom ti.me tc time during th~ course of consr, ruction; and WHEREAS, said "CWNER" shall construct and install the complete sani2ary sewage syste'~, all of wl"~Jeh w~ll be merged with tke sewage sys[em of the "VILLkGE" for tke projecK called "£:ECONIC LANDING" as ]o(:i~ed on the premises ntore parKiculariy described in Schedule ~k,', and to trans[er and convey same to the "VILLAGE" upon eompleticn o~ said sewage system, and to give and procure easements for the main[enance of said sewage system, and :~[.her appurtenances for Lhe proper operation of the aforesaid s~w~g~ collection system; and WHEREAS, U.S. RetiremenK Coram'~nitiee, as agent for "OYSTER" has secure~ final approval for said proDect from the Sout~old Town P!annir.~ Board; and WHEREAS, no ~inal approval has ye~ been secured f. rom the Suffolk County Depar~menK of Health for a sewa~qe collection sysZem, the "VILL.AGE~ will ass3. st in securinq such approval upon :h~ [ ~.~rms and conditions hereinafter sta~ed. ~<]w, THEREFORe,, in consideration of the premises and covenanr.~: herein it ~s m'~tual]y agreed as follows: FIRST: The "OWNER" agrees ~o install, an izs own cost and expense, on t~e propsrKy described in Schedllle "k", a sanitary sewmge collection system including, bu[ no~ limited to sewage mai~ts and ].irt etaEion(s) for the proper collection of sewage 2. ~rom the pr¢~jecE as £,utlined in the Mayl(~r Engineering Re.Doff, as alne~ded, wiEh ~espec~ to paragraph VII thereof on page 13 of 24 pages to provide [hat the Force Main be .u%ade of a ~our inch diameter Ductile TI'on pipe %;hich is attached hereto as Schedule SECO}rD: All necessary engineering and construction for the i~]suai!ati.~n of the complete sanitary sewage system on the property of t%'~e "OWNER", as well as from the connection at the "OWNER'S" property, across and along State Route 25, along Bailey Avenue, to the "VILLAGE'S" existing sewage main on Atlantic Avenue, Greenport, New York, shall be a~ the sole cost and expense of the "OWNER" and the responsibility of the latter tc perform and construct, same. The foregoing shall be referred to as the "WCR[", which shall be designed and constructed by the "OWNER" and/or its subcontractors. The ~'WORK" shall be ii1 acao~.dance with the plans and specifications prepared bv the "OW~ER'S" Engineer, to be approved by ~he "VILLAGE~ S" Engineer in writing before the "OWNER" com~%ences the "WORK". %~HIRD: The oost and/or fee to the "OWNER,~ ~or the privilege 5o connect its proj~.ct to the Sewage ?rea~ment Plant .Df "VILLAGE" shall he in the amount of $2,326,082.00 and specifically cover collection and se~er treatmenu service for 255 units consist:Lng of 118 cot~2ages for single family occupancy, 132 apartments in a 2~ story building, 44 beds in a skilled nursing uniE, 26 assisted ~iving units, a sin~31e building community c~nter, and xxo other add!~.~ons and iu~provements, payable as follows: $1,693,582.0C by bank or certified check, payable tc 3 ti~e VTLI~GE CF GREENP0RT upcn the "CWNER'~a closin9 its bank mortgsge construction iean~ whioh shall bm no l~tar nhan the ~lSt day of Dece~er, 2000~ ~nd $6~2,500.00 to be paid by execution cf an i~stallmer~t bond and/or note bearln~ interesg g~e rare oC seven and three-fourths (7~) parcent per annum, payable over a term of ten (i.0) yearm~ in monthly installments of principal and interest each in the sum oC $7,590.6~, co~encin~ l~llirt], {A0~ days from the date o~ closin~ its aonst~ction loan~ thc principal balance of 5he said note on Bn installment due date may bm paid in full, upon ~i~teen {15) days~ written notice to the Obtz~ee~ To secure the pa~.eng of said bond and/or note, t~e Obligor simulr, aneously with the executzon o~ said cote shall execute a mortgage in proper fo~ for recording in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office of the premises d~scribed ~n Schedule to this A~reement. ~e sai~ mortgage shall be subordinate only to a first mortgage ccnstruction loan amd/or IDA financing against t~e premises described in Schedule "A" and to no other mortgage exec~r, ed or to be executed by or in behalf of the Obligor a~ainst said pren~i~es. The "OWM~R" shall pay ~he expe~ses of a mor~ga~e~ titl~ search and titl~ pelicy issued by a ti~!e com. pany ~icensed to do business in Suffolk County, New Ycrk, mortgage taxes, recordin~ ~ees and preparation o~ th~ bond and/~r note and morngage docun%ents. That in the event the 'o'm~]E~'' fails to close its construcsion loan ~org~a~e for any ~eason whagsoever on or b~fore the 31st day of Dece~er, 2000, and %~e pa~ent of monism due ghe "VILLAGE" under ~his k~reament are in de~autt, the ~will~ssrve" letter issued pursuant to pi{legrap~ THIRD (c) shall be deemed null mud void and of no force a~.ld effects, and the ~aortgage and ~his Agreement shall be cancelled. In add~.~;ion %o all mf the payments required in this paragraph "TNIRD", said "OWNER" shall upon the execution of shis Agreemmnt deliver ~.o ~he "VYLLAGE", the followin~ listed docu~%ant m: (a) A sufficient number of executed Discontinuance of Action by i,B:; PROPERTIES v, VILLAGE OF GRREN~ORT ~T AL. under Suffolk County Ir~dex No. 88-5731; and (b) A letter prepared and signed by the attorneys for LBV t'.ROPERTISS, which sets forth their consent to the discontinuance of the appeal file~ and ~ow pendin~ by the VILtAGE O~ GREENPORT ET AL. under Docket No. 99-06039; and {c) Tile "VILLAGE" simultaneously herewith shell deliver: (~) a "will-serve" letter for sewer collection an~.l treatment services in the form heretofore approved by the Suffolk County Department o~ Health; and (2) a copy of the Naylor Engineerin~ Concept'ual Engineering Design Report. submitted June 5, 1998 duly endorsee, a~ amended, wi~.h the "VILLAGE'S" approval. FOURTH: The "VILLAGe" reserves tile right to expand its sewer collection system by the installation of gravity mai~%s at tt~e ~¢ek~'~ination o~ the force ma~n ~ns~allmd by the "OWNER". ~ The gravity mains, if installed by the "VILLAGE", would be at its FIFTM: .111 '~WORK', shall be inspected by the "VI£.I~A.~E" which hereby designates its Village Engineer ct his designee, with -~ull power of inspection here~ander. The "OWNER" will grant agcess for pu. rpo~ea of inspec?-o:~ Eo al.k pares (Df the pres'].scs ~r:d the "WORK". The ,,¥?£LL~2E" shall ~ave 5~] au=li[~rized inspector at: si[~ att auch c~mes aa it dee~ necessa~A/. ~c, backfilling shall be ~ons unti.! the pipe and the '~WORK" in tbs 5renches have approved a~d tested (~r prior pe!~.Lssion ~.as been o]t3tainad fro~ the inspector. ~:e ,,OWNER" ~gre~s to pay the "VILLAGE'S" Ccr ail inspection ~eas cnar~]ed by the "VILLAGE'~, which costs shall be based on an hourly charge ~o Be s%~bmisted to the pericdical!y in advance cC tk~e inspecEior~s~ sIX~: The '~OWN~R" agree[-], upon wriz~en approval of the cc,~[pleted "WCRK" Dy the "VILLAGE" and co~p!iance wish all other provisions of this Agreement, it wi.l[ fo~lly dedicate to the "VILI~E~', and ~he "i;ILLA~.E" will accept, the entire Mandatary sewa?e collect]on system, i~cl~din~ but ~]ot limi. ued to sewer mainu, lift statiun{s} and appurtenances, f'~e~ and clear of all ~t'~'~'~ and convey to, the "V[L,I~GE'~ easements and rights-of-way the ~>urp~sm of layings, relaying, repairing an~ maintalnin~ sanitary sewage c~i. lection facilities and appurtenances, and any othez' ri. this-of-way and ea~em~naM, uhe "VILL~.GE~' needs or req'uir~.s for hook-up oC the system to its othe~ sewage mains and treat.~%e~t plant. The aforesaid right~-of-way and easements sha]l extend Cive (5} feet on either side oJ th~ sewer ma,.ns r.o Ds J_nstaLl~d purs~an~ to 5bls Agreemen%, Nhether or '~]ot such d~.stance sha]_l be wire, ia the roadway. The sewer m~ins, lift eta.lion(s), appurtenances, easements and rights-of-way shall be perpetuity. The easements granted herein are not exclusive; P. owe~z~r, no other poles, cabl~-s or structured are to be set withim seven feet of. either side of a sewer main, If utility, sewer or other services ne~]essarily CrOSs the water resins, the "OWNER" will advise the .VILLAGE" in writing of the exact location o~ such ~ntersection, and upon Jnsta!lation shall supply maps to the "VILLAGE'~ showin~ ~he exact locations. Said intersections shall not be pez-mltted without the prior written consent of the "VILLAGE", which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Upon the ded~..ca~ion of the sanitary sewer collection ~ystem to the "¥!LLAG~'~, 5he "VILfi~z~GE" shall ~here~fter take over the operation and maintenamce o~ ~he pump ~tation and the force mains ~ownstream to the "ViLLAC~E" sanitary sewage treatment plant -].ncluding all repairs and replacements thereto at, its sole cost and expense. The "OWNER" shall be recp/ired to operste, take care of, mainta~E, r~palr aud rel~lace, a5 its sole cost and expense~ Lhe entire network of pipin~3 and fixtures wit, bin and to the ~aeilities cC the cor~pl, ex, SEVENT.q: IC the "WORK" congemplated in this Agreement ~or' installation cfi the sewage collection sysgem shall be done in sta%~,~.s, it is mutually a~reed and und~.rstood that al! speczfimati~ns and re~erences t.c material used for the construction of- said system and the "WORK" to be completed r.k~r~on will be chanoed to c~*~nform to the then current standards set by the "VILLAGE". The "VI[~LAGE" wi5]. ~'~otifiy the "OWNER" of any changes ~rom ~he plans and specifications which have been previously approved by the "¥ILLAGg,. Should the "0WN~R" d~sire to lay the mains or sewage collection facii~ties in sections, separate constr~ction ccntrncts may be let if mn the opinion of the "VILLAGE" Engineer such ~ections will provide for th~ proper sewage collection in conformance with the overall plan. EIGHTH: Upon comp]etion, inspection and approval of "WORK", the "VILLAGE" shall operiAr, e the sanitary sewa_ge collection system to the project, and ~he individnal owners of the cot. rages and the buildings. The "VILLAGE" shall charge the rotes applicable pursuant to the rules and regulations of the "VILLAGE" to othe. r custo~.~ers of the "VILLAGE" who are located and/or r~eide outside of the incorporated limits o~ the %'illage of Greenport. NINTH~ This A~eemen~ con[a~ns the co~%plete understandin~ and a~reement of the parties for th9 acquisltJon by the "VILLAGE" of the sewage collection system and i~s hook-up to uhe "VILLAGE" sewage ~reaument plant.. ~£he "OW~E~t'~ agrees that ir.. will no~ make any claims a~ainet the "VILLAGE" cn account o~ the installation an~ conveyanc~ of che s~.wa~e collection system, monies paid on con~ract to the ,,VILLAGE', and accepr, anca of this Agreement, notwithstandmng the provisions of any general or special law to r.he contrary which may or may not be enacted in U]:~e future. TENTH: This Agreement shall enure to the benefit and shall bind the respective heirs, legal representatives or successors an.~ assigns of '~he par~.ies hereto. EL~VE}~FH: This Aoreement shall not be ~ssigned by ~he "OWNER" without the consent in writinF of the "VILLAGE". IN WI'~EOoS WHEREOF, the p~ar~ies have executed this Agreement 8 four (4) or±ginals, counterparts, all of which shall constitute Lhe day and year first above written. VILLAGE ©F GREENPORT PBCONIC LJ~NDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. Ray~ond ~. ' Vice-President ~TATR OF NEW YORK) ; SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On the 26th day of April, 2000, before me perscnally came DAVID E. KAPELL, to me known, %~ho, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at k43 SixLh Street, Greenport, New ~ork; that h~ is the Mayor of the VILLAGE OP GREENPORT, the m~m~cipal corporation described in and whic~ e×ecu[ed the £oregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; ~ha~ [he seal eo affixed to said instillment is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed b~' order of the board of trustees of said corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like order. Notary Public CHARLES FL CUDD¥ Notmy Public, State ot New Y~'k No, ~B?~Z2~ Oullftfled in Su~ik Cou~ STATE OF NKW YORK) COL~NTY OF SUFFOLK) On the 26t~1 day of April. 2000, before me personally came R~YMOND C. WESNOFSKE. to me known, who, b~in~ by me duly swQYn, did depose and say that he resides at Br/dgeha~pton Road, Bridgehamt~ton, New York; that he is vice-president of Peconic La~ing at Southold, Inc., the corporatioi~ described in and which executed th~ forsgoin~ instr'~tment; that he knows the seal of said cor~:cration; tha~ the seal affixed to said instrument is such seal; that it was so affixed Dy crder of the Board of Directors of ~aid corporation; ai~d tha~ he si§ned his name thereto by like order. Notary Public (:~RLE8 R. CUOD~ FIo. Quln~ in 8Ld~slk C~i~y 10 FRANK JUSTIN Mc INTOSH PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETIt L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND March 16, 2007 Michael E. Steinmuller Peconic Landing 1500 Brecknock Road Greenport, N.Y. 11944 Peconic Landing ADA signage Main Road, Greenport SCTM: 1000-35-1-25 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING Al)DRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Dear Mr. Steinmuller: In response to your verbal request on March 8, 2007 site visit. Attached you will find a copy of the NYS Codes section 1105 and 1106 for the handicap parking areas requirements. In reference to site plan approved on December 5, 2000, the Planning Board held a work session on March 12, 2007 to discuss the Planning Department staff site visit comments. As we discussed at the site visit the signage must comply with NYS Code section 1106.4. This is to notify you that all handicap parking stalls, access aisles and signage must comply with New York State Code and ADA requirements. This letter does not condone any changes from the site plan and approvals from other agencies if required. Senior Site Plan Reviewer Cc: File, Building Department ACCESSiBiLITY SECTION 1105 ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES 1105.1 Reqnired. At least 50 percent but uot less than one entrance to each building and smlcmre, and each separate tenant space witbin the building or structure, shall comply with the accessible route pruvisions of this chapter. - Exceptions: 1. Entrances to spaces not required to be accessible as provided for in Secthm 1107 or 1108. 2.Loading and service entrances that are not the only eotrance to a bnilding or to a tenant space. 1105.2 Multiple accessible entrances. Where a building or facility has entrances that normally serve accessible parking facilities, traosportatioo facilities, passenger load- ing zones, taxi stands, public streets and sidewalks, tunnels or elevated walkways, or accessible interior vertical access, then at least one of the entrances serving each such func- tion sha0 cnmply with the accessible route provisions of this chapter. SECTION ~,~106 t PARKING AND~ASSENGER LOADING FACILITIES 1106.1 Required. Where parking is provided, accessible parking spaces in conformance with ICC/ANSI All7.1 shall be provided in compliance with Table 1106.1 except as required by Sections 1106.2 and 1106.3 and excerpt that spaces shall be provided with access aisles at least 8 feet (2440 mm) wide_. 1106.2 Groups R-2 and R-3. Two percent but not less than one of each type of parking space provided for occu- pancies in Groups R-2 and R-3, which are required to have Type A or Type B dv, elling or sleeping nnits, shall be accessible. Where parking is provided within or beneath a building, accessible parking spaces shall also be provided within or beneath tbe boilding, 1106.3 Rehabilitation facilities and outpatient physical therapy facilities. Twenty percent of patient and visitor parking spaces provided at rehabilitation facilities and out- patient physical therapy facilities shall be accessible. 1106.4 S~l!nage. Each accessible parking space shall be provided with si~nage displaying the international symbol of accessibility, Each access aisle shall be provided with simmge reading "No Pm'kine Anytime.' Signs sha![ bq per- manently installed at a clear height of between 60 inches (1595 mtn) and 84 iaches (~185 mm~lbove grade and shall rtot iBterfere with an accessible route from an access aisle. TABLE 1106.1 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER PROVIDED OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES I to 25 1 26 to 50 2 51 to75 3 76 to 100 4 101 to 150 5 151 to200 6 201 to300 7 301 to 400 8 401 to 500 9 501 to 1,000 2% of total 20 plus one for each 100 over More than 1,000 1,000 1106.5 Location. Accessible parking spaces shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel from adja- cent parking to an accessible building entrance. In parking facilities that do not serve a particular building, accessible parking spaces shall be located on the shortest route to an accessible pedestrian entrance to the parking facility. Where buildings have multiple accessible entrances with adjacent parking, accessible parking spaces shall be dis- persed and located near the accessible entrances. Exception: In multilevel parking structures, for every nv eight or fraction of eight accessible spaces, at least one ~ shall be in a location having a minimum vertical clear- uv ance of 98 inches (2490 mm~ maintained along the ¢ vehicular route connectine the space with a designated ¢ entrance and exit. Such spaces are permitted on one ~ level. 1106.6 Passenger loading zones. Passenger loading zones shall be designed and constructed in accordance with ICC/ ANSI A117.l. 1106.6.1 Medical facilities. A passenger loading zone shall be provided at an accessible entrance to licensed medical and long-term care facilities where people receive physical or medical treatment or care and where the period of stay exceeds 24 hours. 1106.6.2 Valet parking. A passenger loading zone shall be provided at valet parking services. BUILDING CODE OF NEWYORK STATE · 239 ~_ , SITE PLAN Presub mission con(erence (xvithi~x 30 days of written request) Complete application received (within 4 ~,~nths of presu[), con[erence) Application teviexved ~ work session (within lO days of receipt) ApplJc;mt advised of necessary revisions (withit~ 30 days of review) Revised submission received d >,gency Coordination RA determination gEFERRED TO: Zoning Board of Appeals (written cpm merits within 60 days of request} g ild[ag Bepartment (certification) Department of Transportation - County ~Suffolk Count), Dept. of Ilea/th Fire Commissioners ';' Draft Covenants and Restrictions , Filed Covenants and Restrict. ions /andscape plan /ghting plan k/~urb Cut approval ~'['55 ;l i n ',1'~ e plan ~cviewed by l!ngineer .._. -with conditions Sent: Received:.. . l!ndorsemcn[ of site plan Cc,:{i£ica[e of Occupancy inspection ',. ,;, /.. One year Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 11/30/00 Transaction(s): Application Fees Receipt~: 4868 Subtotal $237,853.00 Check#:004868 Total Paid: $237,853.00 Name: Peconic, Landing Greenport, NY 11944 DEC 0 z 2000 $outhold Town Planning Board Clerk ID: JOYCEW Internal ID: 20285 SUFFOLK UNTY NATIONAL BANK Dan A. Cieale Senior Vice President & Trust Officer April 26, 2004 Ms. Holly Stevens Retirement Living Services, LLC 100 All3a~ Street Hartford, CT 06103 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, lnc, Escrow Custodial Account No. 60-00-6971-32-3 DearHolly: This will confirm that $132,000.00, plus interest of $2,690.49 was wired to: The Bank of New York ABA #021000018 GLA #111-565 Acct. #648111 Acct. Name: Peconic Landing Construction Fund Atto: Miriam Moraca We released the $132,000.00, under Resoltttion #226 of 2004, adopted at the regular meeting of the Southold Town Board on March 23, 2004, and the interest under letter dated, July 31,2001, fi.om William G. Thompson, President. This wire represents final principal payment. Their will be a small interest amount ereflited to the account in the first week of May, representing interest for April, which will be wired to The Bank of New York. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very ~uly yours, Cc: Char/es Cuddy, Esq. William G. Thompson, President Elizabeth A. Neville, Sonthold Town Clerk Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Planning Board Chairman Dan A. Cicale ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Teleohone (631) 7R.~-1 ~flfl 4' THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION nO. 226 O~ 20v,~ WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON MARCH 23, 2004: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes the release of the remaining. $132~000.00 performance bond guarantee for improvements in Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., located at north side Main Road, east of Sound Road at Grcenport, New York all in accordance with the recommendation of thc Planning Board and approval of the Town Engineer. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 147 OF 2004 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON FEBRUARY 24, 2004: RESOLVED that thc Town board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes the remaining $132~000.00 bank escrow custodial account held as a performance guarantee for improvements for Peconic Landing at Southold~ Inc. be released, as recommended by the Southold Town Planning Board and approval of Town Engineer James Richter. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk PLANNING BOARD MEM~RS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILl,lAM J. CREMERS KENNETHL EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P,O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 10, 2004 Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Located on the north side of Main Road,1,121' east of Sound Rd., in Greenport SCTM#1000-35-1-25 Zone: HD Dear Ms. Neville: The following took place at a me,ting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, February 9, 2004: / RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board release the remaining $132,000. bond as a performance guarantee for improvements and recommends same to the Town Board. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, ¢/Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Att. PLANNING BOARD MEMB~I~s JEP~ILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WII~LIAMJ CREMERS KENNETH L EDWARDS MAR'rlN H, SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-t938 Fax (631l 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 10, 2004 Mr. Dennis M. Wilhelm, Sr. Vice President Retirement Living Services 100 AIlyn Street Hartford, Connecticut 06103 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Located on the north side of Main Road,l,121' east of Sound Rd., in Greenport SCTM#1000-35-1-25 Zone: HD Dear Mr. Wilhelm: The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, February 9, 2004, adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the applicant has an outstanding performance bond in the ;~imount of $132,000, as last reduced by the Southold Town Board on December ~7, 2002, Resolution No. 839 of 2002, and issued by the Suffolk County National Bank, as a performance guarantee for the site plan known as Peconic Landing; and WHEREAS, James Richter, the Town Engineer, performed a final inspection of the required improvements and has issued a letter of completion, dated December 15, 2003; and WHEREAS, the site was inspected by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on January 19, 2003, and found to be in compliance with all relevant permits; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town PLanning Board release the remaining $132,000. bond as a performance guarantee for improvements and recommends same to the Town Board. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, oodhouse Chairperson Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: BOARD OFTOWNTRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Victor L'Eplattcnier Board of Trustees January 22, 2004 Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM#35-1-25 dAN Southold row~ Thc Southold Town Board of Trustees inspected thc above-referenced property on January 19, 2004 and determined the bluff area improvements to be in compliance with Permit #5477. However, any new activity, including a walkway along the bluff area, would require a further review from this office. YOUNG & YOUNG 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Telephone 631-727-2303 Facsimile 631-727-0144 admin ~youngengineering. com HOWARD W. YOUNG, Land Surveyor THOMAS C. WOLPERT, Professional Engineer ROBERT C. TAST, Architect RONALD E. PFUHL, Landscape Architect Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 January 19, 2004 RE: PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) $outhold Towll Plannini Boar~ Dear Members of the Board: Kindly consider this request, on behalf of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., to release the remaining monies related to site improvements, ie. street trees - $50,000 (100% complete), and pedestrian paths - $76,000 (100% complete except as noted herein). We understand that a final site plan inspection was recently completed by Mr. James A. Richter and Mr. Victor L'Eplattenier in response to our request by letter dated November 11, 2003 (copy enclosed). According to Mr. Victor L'Eplattenier, the final site inspection revealed that the proposed pedestrian path along the bluff in the westerly portion of the site was not constructed. Please be advised that the subject pedestrian path along the bluff will not be constructed and that all other site work has been completed. Planning Engineering Land Surveying Architecture Page 2 January 19, 2004 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. TCW/dc Encl. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert CC: Retirement Living Services ATTN: Mr. Dennis M. Wilhelm Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. + Encl. + Encl. YOUNG & YOUNG 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Telephone 631-727-2303 Facsimile 631-727-0144 admin @youngengineering. corn HOWARD W. YOUNG, Land SurzJeyor THOMAS C. WOLPERT, Professional Engineer ROBERT C TAST, Architect RONALD E. PFUHL, Landscape Architect November 11, 2003 ATTN: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr, Orlowski: We hereby request, on behalf of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., that the Town complete a final site plan inspection of the above referenced facility. We understand that, upon completion of the final site plan inspection, the developer (Retirement Living Services) will be in a position to request release of any remaining monies related to site improvements, ie. street trees - $50,000 and pedestrian paths - $76,000.00. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, TCW/sjt cc: Retirement Living Services A~-rN: Mr. Dennis M. Wilhelm Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Planning Engineering Land Surveying Architecture L'Eplattenier, Victor From; ent: To: Subject: Standish, Lauren Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:50 AM L'Eplattenier, Victor Peconic Landing Good morning Vic, The Trustees inspected Peconic Landing yesterday(, Jan. 19th, an~J found the project to be in compliance with the permits issued by our Board. ~. / Lauren JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax (516)-765-1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel.(516)-765- 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Re: Peconic Landing Final Planning Board Inspection Report Release of Performance Bonds Dear Mr. Orlowski: December 15, 2003 DEC 1 6 2OO3 $outhol~ Town Plaonin; B0ar4 As per your request, Victor L'Eplattenier and I have completed a final review of the Peconic Landing Site for compliance with the Final Site Plan that was approved by the Planning Board. All of the Maintenance Bond items have been completed in a satisfactory manner with the exception of the proposed walkway along the Top of Bluff on the northerly side of the property. This item has been deleted from the project by the developers of the site. Due to the nature of the proposed construction and the proximity to fragile slopes contained within the Bluff Face, this would be considered a recommended change to the site plan. Our site inspection revealed the installation of split rail fencing along the landward side of the Top of Bluff on the easterly side of the Site. The inspection also revealed that some of the underbrush in the area adjacent to the Bluff has been cut further back to accommodate the installation of this fencing. At this time, it is recommended that the Town Trustees be given the opportunity to do a final inspection of the Bluff area and provide their input regarding compliance with Coastal Erosion Regulations. On your behalf, I have contacted the Trustees office and suggested that they do a final inspection prior to release of the Performance Bonds. At this ti me, with the exception of the Trustee matter as noted above, the project is considered complete and meets the minimum requirements established by Town Code and Planning Board approvals. If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please contact my office. CC: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) /~arnes A. Richter, R.A. JOSHUA Y. HORTON JAMES A. RICHTER, SUPERVISOR ' ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Fax (516) - 765 - 1366 Tel, (516)- 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Re: Peconic Landing Final Planning Board Inspection Report Release of Performance Bonds Dear Mr. Orlewski: December 15, 2003 DEC '16 2003 $outhold Town Plannin~ Boar~ As per your request, Victor L'Eplattenier and I have completed a final review of the Peconic Landing Site for compliance with the Final Site Plan that was approved by the Planning Board. All of the Maintenance Bond items have been completed in a satisfactory manner with the exception of the proposed walkway along the Top of Bluff on the northerly side of the property. This item has been ~Jeleted from the project by the d/~velopers of the site. Due to the nature of the proposed constructio~ and the proximity to fragile sl~oes contained within the Bluff Face, this would be considered a recommended change to the site plan. Our site inspection revealed the installation of split rail fencing along the landward side of the Top of Bluff on the easterly side of the Site. The inspection also revealed that some of the underbrush in the area adjacent to the Bluff has been cut further back to accommodate the installation of this fencing. At this time, it is recommended that the Town Trustees be given the opportunity to do a final inspection of the Bluff area and provide their input regarding compliance with Coastal Erosion Regulations. On your behalf, I have contacted the Trustees office and suggested that they do a final inspection prior to release of the Performance Bonds. At this time, with the exception of the Trustee matter as noted above, the project is considered complete and meets the minimum requirements established by Town Code and Planning Board approvals. If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please contact my office. cc: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) ichter, R.A. MEMORANDUM To: From: Re: Files Victor L'Eplattenier, Site Plan Review~/~' Peconic Landing SCTM: 1000-35-1-25,et al Date: December 15,2003 Jamie Richter and I went to Peconic Landing today to perform an inspection to determine if the final bond could be reduced to zero, at the request of Tom Wolpert, P.E. Jamie has determined that virtually all of the required construction is complete, as determined by the engineering reports on file, and verified by on site inspection. However, he noted some recent conditions, which need to be addressed, as follows: 1. He noted intensive clearing along the bluff, up to the fence line of a recent split rail fence, behind several of the cottages, probably to enhance the view of the L.I.Sound. He will notify the Trustees so they can perform an inspection and report if Peconic Landing is in violation. 2. Some rocks between ponds 1 and 2 appear missing or fallen, although they do not interfere with drainage or water flow, but make the barrier appear incomplete or broken. 3. The approved walkway along the bluff, representing a $79,000 item in the approved Bond, was not built, at the discretion of Peconic Landing. This is O.K. With Jamie, since it was not required to be constructed. 4. The presence of excess debris and brush in the maintenance area was noted, and Jamie will contact Peconic Landing to get it cleaned up ASAP. Jamie will send me a memo regarding the Bond release, and if the Trustees sign off on the clearing along the bluff, a resolution for the PB can be written for the next available meeting. Cc: B.Semon PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN II. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To.' From: Re: James A. Richter, R.A. Office of Town Engineer .,~ / Victor L'Eplattenier, Site Plan Review~ Peconic Landing SCTM: 1000.35-1-25,et al Date: November 20,2003 /' Attached is a copy of a request from Thomas Wolpert P, E., to complete a final site inspection, and subsequent release of the remaining Bond amounts. Upon your return in December, can we please schedule a joint site visit to assess the status of construction remaining (if any)? Also, is Tom's presence on the site visit necessary, or should we just do it ourselves? Please advise me which dates in early December you would be available for the inspection, and let me know the steps required to release the final Bond. Thanks for your assistance in this matter. Cc: B.Semon YOUNG & YOUNG 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Telephone 631-727-2303 Facsimile 631-727-0144 admin~yqungengineering, com HOWARD V~ YOUNG, Land Surv~or THOMAS C. WOLPERT, Professional Engineer ROBERT C TAST, Architect RONALD E. PFUHL, Landscape Architect November 11, 2003 A~-FN: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Ir., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Orlowski: We hereby request, on behalf of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., that the Town complete a final site plan inspection of the above referenced facility. We understand that, upon completion of the f nal site plan inspection, the developer (Retirement Living Services) will be in a position to i-equest release of any remaining monies related to site improvements, ie. street trees - $50,000 and pedestrian paths - $76,000.00. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. TCW/sjt CC: Retirement Living Services A~-I'N: Mr. Dennis M. Wilhelm Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Planning Engineering Land Surveying Architecture YOUNG & YOUNG 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Telephone 631-727-2303 Facsimile 631-727-0144 admin@youngengineering, com HOWARD W YOUNG, Land SurVeyOr THOMAS C. WOLPERT, Professional Engineer ROBERT C. YAST, Architect RONALD E. PFUHL, Landscape Architect November 11, 2003 AFl'N: Hr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of $outhold Planning Board 53095 Hain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Orlowski: NOV 12 2003 Plannin{ Boa~ We hereby request, on behalf of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., that the Town complete a final site plan inspection of the above referenced facility. We understand that, upon completion of the final site plan inspection, the developer (Retirement Living Services) will be in a position to request release of any remaining monies related to site improvements, ie. street trees - $50,000 and pedestrian paths - $76,000.00. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. TCW/sjt cc: Retirement Living Services A'rrN: Mr. Dennis M. Wilhelm Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Planning Engineering Land Surwying Architecture M~ailAng Address: Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 CHARLES R. CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRI FFING AVE NUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK March 20, 2003 TEL: (631)369-8200 FAX: (631)369-9080 E-mail: charles.cuddy(¢verizon.net Planning Board Southold Town Hall P O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Dear Mr. Semon: This is to confirm my advice that the bar area for which Peconic Landing has applied for a liquor license from the State Liquor Authority, is located in the Community Cemer adjacent to the dining area and lounge area in this main building. The bar is to serve the residents of Peconic Landing and guests that they may have. It is a club bar, and it is not open to the public. CRC:ik Enclosures Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~TIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk From: Bennett Orlowski, Jd~/~ Chairman, Planning Board Date: March 25,2003 Re~ Peconic Landing-Liquor License SCTM: 1000-35-1-25 Zone: R-80,HD The Planning Board has reviewed this application for a new liquor license in the community center within Peconic Landing,and has no objections. The Planning Board has reviewed the land uses within the prescribed 500 fi radius and has concluded that the issuance of the On-Premise Liquor license will not create any adverse impacts. ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS M~RRIAGE OFFICER RECOI~DS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.nor thforkmet OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 839 OF 2002 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON DECEMBER 17, 2002: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes the reduction of the performance bond for the maior subdivision of Peconic Landing from $1,670~836.00 to $132,000.00 all in accordance with the recommendation of the Southold Town Planning Board, the Town Engineer, and the Superintendent of Highways, and subject to the approval of the Town Attorney. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk THE SUlk. OLK COUNTY NATIO . 4L BANK FINANCIAL PLANNING CENTER 3880Veterans Memorial Highway, Bohemia, New York 11716 - (631) 285-6601 - (631) 585-6398 fax Dan A. Cicale Senior Vice President & Trust Officer May 15, 2002 Ms. Holly Stevens Retirement Living Services, LLC 100 Allyn Street Hartford, CT 06103 Re: Peconic Landing at $outhold, ln~ Escrow Custodial Account No. 60 O0 6971 32 3 Dear Holly: This will confh'm that $953,505.00, plus interest of $22,774.87 was wired to: The Bank of New York ABA #021000018 GLA #111-565 Acct. #648248 Acct. Name: Peconic Landing PILl FD INDENTLTRE We released the $953,505.00, under Resolution #283 of 2002, adopted at the regular meeting of the Southold Town Board on April 25, 2002 and in accordance with my telephone conversation with Elizabeth Neville. The resolution reflects the original deposit, of $3,964,216.00 and not the balance on hand of $2,624,341.0, which is the difference between the original deposit and $1,339,875.00, released on November 6, 200I under Resolution #735 of 2001. Under letter dated May 15th, fi.om Ms. Neville, copy of which is enclosed, the Southold Town Board and Planning Board are requiring a new Performance Guarantee Agreement be executed by Peconic Landing and Suffolk County National bank to reflect a balance on hand of $1,670,836.00. I called Mr. Cuddy to discuss this matter, as Mr. Cuddy drafted the original agreement. The interest is being drawn per letter dated July 31,2001 fi.om William G. Thompson, President. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. cc: Charles Cuddy, Esq William G. Thompson, President Elizabeth A. Neville, Southotd Town Clerk Bennett Orlowski, Planning Board Chairman Dan A. Cicale Senior Vice President & Trust Officer Soutttokl Town Plann g Town Hall, 53095 Main Renal P.O. Box 1179 SouthoI~, New York 11971 Fax (681) 76S-614~ Telephone (Sal) 765-1800 southol~t o ~ .nor t~{'ork.n et OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLEF. K TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 15~ 200:2 Dan A. Senior Vice~-Presid~t ~ Trust Officer Suffotk Co~ Nafioml Bank ~e Fina~cL~L Pla~iug 3880 Va~s Memofi~ ~way Bohemi~ New York 11716 Mr, ckaie: I am writing this lertnr In ~w.~ordauco with om' telephona *onv*rsatio~l this morning. The $outhold Town Board and Planning Board are requiring a wW parformanc~ Ixmd for P~onio Lauding in the arrmunt of $1,670,g36.DO. Additional improv~a~aeots have taken place in a~:,~orda~aoe wi~ the Town B~$~nanr's revised bond effimata dated Maroh 5, 2,002. The, re. fore, the amoa~ ti:az y~u wo,,ld wire to Pomnio L~dlng would be thc difference b~twaea the mn'ant performa~:oe bond ia the amoun~ of $2,1~24,3t11.00, less $L670,~36.00, or $953:$05.00. My apologies t~ you for any int~otlyeniance or misaoderstandlngs, l i'~:~pe this will clarify the transaction for you. Shoutd you have any ftl~h~ queSti,ns with regard to this tt~ae.r, please call me at 631 765- 1800~ ex[. :228. V~'y truly $outhold Town Clerk ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOVfN CLERK REGISTt~ OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 283 OF 2002 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TowN BOARD ON APRIL 25, 2002: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby approves the reduction in the amount of the performance bond for roads~ drainage, and other improvements for Peconic Landing~ Greenport, NY SCTM# 1000-35-1-25, from $3,964,216.00 to $1,670,836.00. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICttARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 SouthoId, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 9, 2002 Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 RE: Peconic Landing - Revised Bond Estimate SCTM: 1000-35-1-25 Dear Ms. Neville: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 8, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board the adoption of the revised Bond Estimate in the amount of $1,670,836.00, dated March 5, 2002 for the above-referenced project. This estimate has been modified to reflect the amount of work completed to date and the estimated value of work remaining to complete the project, as determined by the Town Engineer, and recommended to the Town Board. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Odowski,Jr. Chairman encl. cc: Charles Cuddy, Esq. Dan Cicale, Sr. V.P., Suffolk County National Bank JOSHUA Y.HORTON SUPERVISOR 'FOWN HALl. - 53095 MAYN ROAD Fax (516) 765-1366 ITEM I. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 11. 16. 17. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 32. 33. JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Fei (516) -765- 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOND ESTIMATE ~ PECONIC LANDING SCTM # 1000-35-01-25 Revised: March 5, 2002 TOTAL BOND QUANTITY 1,500 L.F. 69.4 ACRE JOB 264,000 C.Y. 103 EACH 20 EACH 47 EACH 9,551 L.F. 2,778 L.F. 407 L.F. 457 L.F. 825 L.F. 4 EACH 3 EACH I EACH 3,156 S.Y. 65,000 S.Y. 1,570 L.F. 754 S.Y. 6,830 C.Y. 14,500 TONS 3,500 L.F. 1,166 L.F. 500 EACH 85,698 S.Y. 175 EACH 1,340 L.F. 4,200 S.Y. 7,600 S.Y. 80 EACH 2,223 S.Y. JOB JOB DESCRIPTION SAW CUT PAVEMENT (S.R. 25) $ 3.00 CLEARING & GRUBBING 2,500.00 DEMOLITION of STRUCTURES ROUGH GRADING / UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 2.50 CATCH BASINS 2,500.00 UNIT PRICE BOND {+/-) % QUANTITY VALUE AMOUNT COMPLETE REMAINING REMAINING $ 4,500.00 0 % 1,500 L.F. $ 4,500.00 173,500.00 100% 0 0.00 75,000.00 20% 80 % 60,000.00 660,000.00 257,500.00 LEACHING POOL (10' Dia. X 7' deep) 2,000.00 40,000.00 CONCRETE MANHOLE (4' Dia.) 2,000.00 94,000.00 18" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 25.00 238,775.00 24" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 83,340.00 30" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 35.00 14,245.00 36" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 40.00 18,280.00 18" DIA CAST IRON DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 24,750.00 ROCK DAM 5,000.00 20,000.00 ROCK HEADWALL 5,000.00 15,000.00 PRECAST CONCRETE CULVERT 100,000.00 100,000.00 POND LINER (2' Compacted Clay) 15.00 47,340.00 FINE GRADING 1.50 97,500.00 CONCRETE CURBING 10.00 15,700.00 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 30.00 22,620.00 %" STONE BLEND or RCA BASE 30.00 204,900.00 ASPHALT PAVEMENT 60.00 870,000.00 EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURE 10.00 35,000.00 MASONRY RETAINING WALL 150.00 174,900.00 STREET TREE 200.00 100,000.00 TOPSOIL & SEED 2.00 171,396.00 STREET LIGHTS 1,500.00 262,500.00 ROAD RESTORATION (Bailey & Atlantic) 5.00 6,700.00 MICRO SURFACING (Bailey & Atlantic) 1.20 5,040.00 PEDESTRIAN PATH 10.00 76,000.00 STREET SIGNS 200.00 16,000.00 FIRE LANE 10.t)0 22,230.00 TRASH PICK UP AREA 7,500.00 MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 10,000.00 80% 52,800 C.Y. 132,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 95% 2 EACH 4,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 50% 224 L.F. 8,960.00 100% 0 0.00 0% 4 EACH 20,000.00 0% 3 EACH 15,000.00 100% 0 0.00 0% 3,156 S.Y. 47,340.00 50% 32,500 S.Y. 48,750.00 0% 1,570 L.F. 15,700.00 0% 754 S.Y. 22,620.00 50% 3,415 C.Y. 102,450.00 35% 9,425 TONS 565,500.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 0% 500 EACH 100,000.00 30% 60,698 S.Y. 121,396.00 0% 175 EACH 262,500.00 50% 1,340 L.F. 3,350.00 0% 4,200 S.Y. 5,040.00 0% 7,600 S.Y. 76,000.00 0% 80 EACH 16,000.00 0% 2,223 S.Y. 22,230.00 0% 100% 7,500.00 0% 100% 10,000.00 ORIGINAL BOND TOTAL: $ 3,964,216.00 REMAINING BOND AMOUNT FOR INCOMPLETE CONSTRUCTION ITEMS $ 1,670,836.00 JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (516) -765-1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R~ ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel. (516) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 26, 2002 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Peconic Landing - Revised Bond Estimate Dear Mr. Orlowski: Southold Town:, P~aaning Board As per your request, enclosed please find a revised Bond Estimate for the above referenced project. This estimate has been modified to reflect the amount of work completed to date and the estimated value of work remaining to complete the project. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. CC: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) S, ir;merely, JOSHUA Y.HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (516)-765-1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 TEL(516)-765- 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOND ESTIMATE ~ PECONIC LANDING SCTM # 1000-35-01-25 Revised: March 5, 2002 IT__EM 1 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 17. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. TOTAL BOND QUANTITY 1,500 L.F. 69.4 ACRE JOB 264,000 C.Y. 103 EACH 20 EACH 47 EACH 9,551 L.F. 2,778 L.F. 407 L.F. 457 L.F. 825 L.F. 4 EACH 3 EACH I EACH 3,156 S.Y. 65,000 S.Y. 1,570 L.F. 754 S.Y. 6,830 C.Y. 14,500 TONS 3,500 L.F. 1,166 L.F. 500 EACH 85,698 S.Y. 175 EACH 1,340 L.F, 4,200 S.Y. 7,600 S.Y. 80 EACH 2,223 S.Y. JOB JOB DESCRIPTION SAW CUT PAVEMENT (S.R. 25) $ 3.00 CLEARING& GRUBBING 2,500.00 DEMOLITION of STRUCTURES ROUGH GRADING / UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 2.50 CATCH BASINS 2,500.00 UNIT PRICE BOND (+/-) % QUANTITY VALUE AMOUNT COMPLETE REMAINING REMAINING $ 4,500.00 0 % 1,500 L.F. $ 4,500.00 173,500.00 100% 0 0.00 75,000.00 20% 80 % 60,000.00 660,000.00 257,500.00 LEACHING POOL (10' Dia. X 7' deep) 2,000.00 40,000.00 CONCRETE MANHOLE (4' Dia.) 2,000.00 94,000.00 18" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 25.00 238,775.00 24" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 83,340.00 30" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 35.00 14,245.00 36" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 40.00 18,280.00 18" DIA CAST IRON DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 24,750.00 ROCK DAM 5,000.00 20,000.00 ROCK HEADWALL 5,000.00 15,000.00 PRECAST CONCRETE CULVERT 100,000.00 100,000.00 POND LINER (2' Compacted Clay) 15.00 47,340.00 FINE GRADING 1.50 97,500.00 CONCRETE CURBING I 0.00 15,700.00 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 30.00 22,620.00 3/2' STONE BLEND or RCA BASE 30.00 204,900.00 ASPHALT PAVEMENT 60.00 870,000.00 EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURE 10.00 35,000.00 MASONRY RETAINING WALL 150.00 174,900.00 STREET TREE 200.00 100,000.00 TOPSOIL & SEED 2.00 171,396.00 STREET LIGHTS 1,500.00 262,500.00 ROAD RESTORA. TION (BaiLey & Atlantic) 5.00 6,700.00 MICRO SURFACING (Bailey & Atlantic) 1.20 5,040.00 PEDESTRIAN PATH I 0.00 76,000.00 STREET SIGNS 200.00 16,000.00 FIRE LANE I 0.00 22,230.00 TRASH PICK UP AREA 7,500.00 MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 10,000.00 80% 52,800 C.Y. 132,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 95% 2 EACH 4,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 50% 224 L.F. 8,960.00 100% 0 0.00 0% 4 EACH 20,000.00 0% 3 EACH 15,000.00 100% 0 0.00 0% 3,156 S.Y. 47,340.00 50% 32,500 S.Y. 48,750.00 0% 1,570 L.F. 15,700.00 0% 754 S.Y. 22,620.00 50% 3,415 C.Y. 102,450.00 35% 9,425 TONS 565,500.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 0% 500 EACH 100,000.00 30% 60,698 S.Y. 121,396.00 0% 175 EACH 262,500.00 50% 1,340 L.F. 3,350.00 0% 4,200 S.Y. 5,040.00 0% 7,600 S.Y. 76,000.00 0% 80 EACH 16,000.00 0% 2,223 S.Y. 22,230.00 0% 100% 7,500.00 0% 100% 10,000.00 ORIGINAL BOND TOTAL: $ 3,964,216.00 REMAINING BOND AMOUNT FOR INCOMPLETE CONSTRUCTION ITEMS $ 1,670,836.00 Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 CHARLES R. CUDDY ATTORNEY AT L AW 445 GRI FFiNG AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK TEL: (631) 369-8200 FAX: (631) 369-c)080 E-mail: crcuddy(~earthhnk.net February 8, 2002 Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Dear Sir/Madam: I am enclosing a copy of a letter forwarded to James A. Richter on behalfofPeconic Landing, in connection with reduction of the Performance Bond. Will you please confirm to me that this Board will be recommending a reduction to the Town Board. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy~j EilclosuI e CRC:cg RETIREMENT LIVING SERVICES, LLC February 1, 2002 James A. Richter, ILA. Town of 8outhold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ?econic Landing at Southold, Inc. Dear Mr. Richter: As a condition of the construction approvals for the captioned project, a performance guarantee in the amount of $3,964,216 was established at the Suffolk County National Banlc The guarantee was provided by Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. ("Peconic Landing~) as a means of guaranteeing the completion of site improvements to the satisfaction of the Town of Southold (the 'Town~). Enclosed is a copy of correspondence from Young & Young, ?econic Landing's Civil Engineer, detailing the original Construction Cost Estimate, as well as work completed and work remaining. Peconic Landing hereby requests that the Town approve release of escrowed funds in the amount of $1,087,$$5.00 in addition to any accrued interest to January S 1,2002. The amount of work complete to date as determined by Young & Young is $2,427,230.00 less the previously Town approved amount of $I,399,875.00 to arrive at the $1,087,S55.00 amount. In neither case do we include the 6% administrative fee, as that amount was paid up front and is not a part of the escrowed funds. Your approval of said release should be directed to: Mr. Dan A. Cicale Senior Vice President The Suffolk County National Bank 3880 Veterans Memorial Highway Bohemia, NY 11716 Acer #: 60 00 6971 32 3 100 ALLYN STREET , HARTFORD. CONNECTICUT 06103 · (860) 525-6688 · F/O((860) 525-6687 James A. Richter, 1LA. Page £ Town of Southold February 1, 2002 Should you have any questions, please direct them to me at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Retirement Living Services, LLC Dennis M. Wilhelm Senior Vice President - Development DMW/mal Copy (including attachment): Dan A. Cicale, Sr. Vice President - Suffolk County National Bank Josh Horton, Town Supervisor - Town of Southold Charles Cuddy, [;squire William G. Thompson, President - Peconic Landing Tom Wolpert, P.E. - Young & Young Holly Stevens - RLS PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: From: Re: James A. Richter, R.A. Office of Town Engineer Victor L'Eplattenier, Senior Planne~ Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM: 1000-35-1-25 Date: February 8,2002 Attached is a copy of correspondence dated February 1,2002 from Mr. Dan A. Cicale requesting the Town approve the release of escrow funds in the amount of $1,087,355.00 plus accrued interest. Please review this request and determine if the amounts requested are accurate. Kindly advise this office in writing after you have reviewed this material and made your determination. February 1, 2002 James A. Richter, R.A. Town of Sduthold F.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RETIREMENT LMNG SERVICES, LLC Peconic Lancline at Southold, Inc. ,Sou mld Town Dear Mr. Richter: As a condition of the construction approvals for the captioned project, a performance guarantee in the amount of $$,964,216 was established at thc Suffolk County Naliortal Bank. The guarantee was provided by Peconic Laltding at Southold, Inc. ("Peconic Landing") as a means of guaranteeing the completion of site improvements to the satisfaction of the Town of Southold (the '°rown'). Enclosed is a copy of correspondence from Young & Young, Peconic Landing's Civil Engineer, detailing the original Construction Cost Estimate, as well as work completed and work remaining. Peconic Landing hereby requests that the Town approve release of escrowed funds in the amount of $1,087,$55.00 in addition to any accrued interest to January $1,2002: The amount of work cgmplete to date as determined by Young & Young is $2,427,250.00 less the previously Town approved amount of $I,$99~875.00 to art/ye at the $1,087,355.00 amount. In neither case do we include the 6% administrative fee, as that amount was paid up front and is not a part of the escrowed funds. Your approval of said release should be directed to: Mr. Dan A. Cicale Senior Vice President The Suffolk County National Bank 3880 Veterans Memorial Highway Bohemia, NY 11716 Acer #: 60 O0 6971:32 S 100 ALLYN STREET , HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06103 , (860) 525-6688, Fax (860) 525-6687 James A. Richter~ R.A. Page 2 Town of Southold February 1, 2002 Should you have any questions, please direct them to me at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Retirement Living Services, LLC Dennis M. Wilhelm Senior Vice t'residen! - Development DMW/mal Copy (including attachment): Dan A. Cicale, Sr. Vice President - Suffolk County National Bank Josh Horton, Town Supervisor - Town of Southold Charles Cuddy, Esquire William G. Thompson, President - Peconic Landing Tom Wolpert~ P.E. ~ Young & Young Holly Stevens ~ RLS 'YOUN(~ & YOUNG 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Telephone (631) 727-2303 Facsimile (631) 727-0144 admin~/oungengineering.com HOWARD IA~. YOUNG, Land Surveyor THOMAS C. WOLPERT, Professional Engineer ROBERT C. TAST, Architect January28,2002 VIA FAX & REGULAR MAIL ATTN: Mr. Dennis M. Wilhelm, Sr. Vice Pres. Retirement Living Services 100 Allyn Street Hartford, Connecticut 06103 RE: PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Wilhelm: Enclosed are the following items: one (1) copy - Construction Cost Estimate dated January 25, 2002 based on Bond Estimate dated August 28, 1998, one (1) copy - Construction Cost Estimate dated January 25, 2002 indicating Value of Work Completed as of January 25, 2002, and one (1) copy - Construction Cost Estimate dated January 25, 2002 indicating Value of Work Remaining as of January 25, 2002. Please note that, based on these estimates the bond may be reduced by an additional $1,149,501.10 ($2,572,863.80 minus $1,423,362.70) representing the value of work completed since August 20, 2001. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert TCW/dc Encl. Planning Engineering Land Surveying Architecture January 25, 2002 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Prepared for PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, Town of Southold, New York based on Bond Estimate dated August 28, 1998 Prepared by Town of Southold Office of the Engineer Item ~ Otv. & Unit Unit Cost No. 1 Saw Cut Asphalt Pavement (S.R. 25) 1,500 L.F. $3.00 2 Clearing & Grubbing 69.4 Acres $2,500.00 3 Demolition/Removal of Existing Structures JOB $75,000.00 4 Rough Grading/Unclassified Excavation 264,000 C.Y. $2.50 5 Catch Basin 103 Each $2,500.00 6 Leaching Pool (10' Dia. X 7' deep) 20 Each $2,000.00 7 Concrete Manhole (4' Dia.) 47 Each $2,000.00 8 18" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 9,551 L.F. $25.00 9 24" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 2,778 L.F. $30,00 10 30" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 407 LF. $35.00 11 36" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 457 L.F. $40.00 12 18" Dia. Cast Iron Drainage Pipe 825 L.F. $30.00 13 Rock Dam 4 Each $5,000.00 14 Rock Head Wall 3 Each $5,000.00 15 Precast Concrete Culvert I Each $100,000.00 16 Pond Liner (2' Compacted Clay) 3,156 S.Y. $15.00 17 Fine Grading 65,000 S.Y. $1.50 18 Concrete Curbing 1,570 L.F. $10.00 19 Concrete Sidewalk 754 S.Y. $30.00 20 3/4" Stone Blend or"RCA" 6,830 C.Y. $30.00 21 Asphalt Pavement 14,500 Tons $60.00 22 Erosion Control Structure 3,500 L.F, $10.00 23 Masonry Retaining Wall 1,166 L.F. $150.00 24 Street Tree 500 Each $200.00 25 Topsoil & Seed 85,698 S.Y. $2.00 26 Street Light 175 Each $1,500.00 27 Road Restoration (Bailey & Atlantic Avenue) 1,340 L.F. $5.00 28 Micro Surfacing (Bailey & Atlantic Avenue) 4,200 S.Y. $1.20 Pedestrian Path 7,600 S.Y. $10.00 Street Sign 80 Each $200.00 Fire Lane 2,223 S.Y. $10.00 Trash Pick Up Area JOB Total Cost $4,500.00 $173,500.00 $75,000.00 $660,000.00 $257,500.00 $40,000.00 $94,000.00 $238,775.00 $83,340.00 $14,245.00 $18,280.00 $24,750.00 $20,000.00 $15,000.00 $100,000.00 $47,340.00 $97,500.00 $15,700.00 $22,620.00 $204,900.00 $870,000.00 $35,000.00 $174,900.00 $100,000.00 $171,396.00 $262,500.00 $6,700.00 $5,040.00 $76,000.00 $16,000.00 $22,230.00 $7,500.O0 January 25, 2002 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Prepared for PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, Town of Southold, New York indicating Value of Work Completed as of January 25, 2002 Item Descrit~tion No. i Saw Cut Asphalt Pavement 2 Clearing & Grubbing 3 Demolition/Removal of Existing Structures 4 Rough Grading/Unclassified Excavation S Catch Basin 6 Leaching Pool (10' Dia. X 7' deep) 7 Concrete Manhole (4' Dia.) 8 18" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 9 24" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 10 30" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 11 36" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 12 18" Dia. Cast Iron Drainage Pipe 13 Rock Dam 14 Rock Head Wall 1S Precast Concrete Culvert 16 Pond Liner (2' Compacted Clay) 17 Fine Grading 18 Concrete Curbing 19 Concrete Sidewalk 20 3/4" Stone Blend or "RCA" 21 Asphalt Pavement 22 Erosion Control Structure 23 Masonry Retaining Wall 24 Street Tree 25 Topsoil & Seed 26 Street Light 27 Road Restoration (Bailey & Atlantic Avenue) 28 Micro Surfacing (Bailey & Atlantic Avenue) Pedestrian Path Street Sign Fire Lane Trash Pick Up Area Otv. & Unit Unit Coot Total Cost 0 L.F. $3.00 $0.00 69.4 Acres $2,500.00 $173,500.00 20% Compl $75,000.00 $15,000.00 211,200 C.Y. $2.50 $528,000.00 103 Each $2,500.00 $257,500.00 20Each $2,000.00 $40,000.00 45 Each $2,000.00 $90,000.00 9,551L.F. $25.00 $238,775.00 2,778 L.F. $30.00 $83,340.00 407 L.F. $35.00 $14,245.00 233 L.F. $40.00 $9,320.00 825 L.F. $30.00 $24,750.00 0 Each $5,000.00 $0.00 0Each $5,000.00 $0.00 leach $100,000.00 $100,000.00 0 S.Y. $32,500.00 $0.00 32,500 S.Y. $1.50 $48,750.00 0 L.F. $10.00 $0.00 0 S.Y. $30.00 $0.00 3,415 C.Y. $30.00 $102,450.00 7,250 Tons $60.00 $435,000.00 3,500 L.F. $10.00 $35,000.00 1,166 L.F. $150.00 $174,900.00 0 Each $200.00 $0.00 25,000 S.Y. $2.00 $50,000.00 OEach $1,500.00 $0.00 1,340 L.F. $5.00 $6,700.00 0 S.Y. $1.20 $0.00 0 S.Y. $10.00 $0.00 O Each $200.00 $0.00 0 S.Y. $10.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 January 25, 2002 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Prepared for PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, Town of Southold, New York indicating Value of Work Remaining as of January 25, 2002 Item Descrintion Otv. & unit Unit Co$~ NO. Total Cost 1 Saw Cut Asphalt Pavement 1,500 L.F. $3.00 $4,500.00 2 Clearing & Grubbing 0 Acres $2,500.00 $0.00 3 Demolition/Removal of Existing Structures 80% $75,000.00 $60,000.00 4 Rough Grading/Unclassified Excavation 52,800 C.Y. $2.50 $132,000.00 5 Catch Basin 0 Each $2,500.00 $0.00 6 Leaching Pool (10' Dia. X 7' deep) 0 Each $2,000.00 $0.00 7 Concrete Manhole (4' Dia.) 2 Each $2,000.00 $4,000.00 8 18" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 0 L.F. $25.00 $0.00 9 24" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 0 L.F. $30.00 $0.00 10 30" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 0 L.F. $35.00 $0.00 11 36" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 224 L.F. $40.00 $8,960.00 12 18" Dia. Cast Iron Drainage Pipe 0 L.F. $30.00 $0.00 13 Rock Dam 4 Each $5,000.00 $20,000.00 14 Rock Head Wall 3 Each $5,000.00 $15,000.00 15 Precast Concrete Culvert 0 Each $100,000.00 $0.00 16 Pond Liner (2' Compacted Clay) 3,156 $.Y. $15.00 $47,340.00 17 Fine Grading 32,500 S.Y. $1.50 $48,750.00 18 Concrete Curbing 1,570 LF. $10.00 $15,700.00 19 Concrete Sidewalk 754 S.Y. $30.00 $22,620.00 20 3/4" Stone Blend or "RCA" 3,415 C.Y, $30.00 $102,450.00 21 Asphalt Pavement 7,250 Tons $60.00 $435,000.00 22 Erosion Control Structure 0 LF. $10.00 $0.00 23 Masonry Retaining Wall 0 L.F. $150.00 $0.00 24 Street Tree 500 Each $200.00 $100,000.O0 25 Topsoil & Seed 60,698 S.Y. $2.00 $121,396.00 26 Street Light 175 Each $1,500,00 $262,500.00 27 Road Restoration (Bailey & Atlantic Avenue) 0 L.F. $5.00 $0.00 28 Micro Surfacing (Bailey & Atlantic Avenue) 4,200 S.Y. $1.20 $5,040,00 Pedestrian Path 7,600 S.Y. $10.00 $76,000.00 Street Sign 80 Each $200.00 $16,000.00 Fire Lane 2,223 S.Y. $10.00 $22,230.00 Trash Pick Up Area 100% $7,500.00 $7,500.00 Dan A. Cicale Senior Vice President & Trust Officer TItE FINANCIAL PLANNING CENTER 3880 Veterans Memorial llighway, Bohemia~ New York, 11'/16 (631) 285-6601, l"'ax (631) 285-6610 Ms. Holly Stevens Retirement Living Services LLC 100 Allyn Street Hartford, CT 06103 November 6, 2001 RECEIVED NOV 7 2001 Southold Town Cler[ Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Escrow Custodial Account No. 60 00 6971 32 3 Dear Holly: This will confirm that $1,339,875. plus interest accrued to date of $162,662.54 was wired to: U.S. Trust Company of New York ABA No. 021001318 Beneficiary Name: Peconic Landing Project Fund Beneficiary Account No. 01168800 Attn: Miriam Moraca Reference: Performance Assurance Account We released the $1,339,875. based on Resolution #735 of 200I, adopted October 23, 2001 at a meeting of the Southold Town Board authorizing reduction of the $3,964,216. performance bond for Peconic Landing at Southold. The interest is being drawn per a letter dated July 31, 2001 fi'om William G. Thompson, President. Holly, I will need written authorization for the above wire instructions as the account agreement shows different instructions, I am also enclosing an account history. from inception of account. CC: Very truly yours, Dan A. Cicale Senior Vice President & Trust Officer Charles Cuddy, Esq. William G. Thompson, President Elizabeth A. Neville, Southold Town Clerk Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Planning Board Chairman Soutflold 'i,. Plaming ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971L Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 29, 2001 Dennis M. Wilhelm Senior Vice-President - Development Retirement Living Services, LLC I00 Allyn Street Hartford, Connecticut 06103 Dear Mr. Wilhelm: The Southold Town Board at their regular meeting held on October 23, 2001 authorized the reduction oftbe performance bond for Peconic Landing. A certified copy of this resolution is enclosed. Please submit the new reduced bond to the Planning Board office for review by the members of the Planning Board and the Town Attorney. Once it is approved and accepted by the Planning Board and the Town Attorney, it would be forwarded to my office for filing. Should you have any questions, or ifI may be of assistance in any way, please call me at 631 765-1800. Very truly yours, Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk cc: Planning Board ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 735 OF 2001 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON OCTOBER 23, 2001: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes the reduction of the $3~964~216.00 performance bond for Peconic Landing at Southold in the amount of $1~339~875.00, all in accordance with the recommendation of thc Southold Town Planning Board and Superintendent of Highways Raymond Jacobs. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk RAYMOND L. JACOBS Superintendent Highway Department Town of Southold Peconic Lane Peconic, N.Y. 11958 Tel. 765-3140 734-5211 Fax 765-1750 October 19, 2001 Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Southold Town Hall P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Bond Reduction Dear Ms. Neville: I have reviewed - Peconic Landing Mr. Richter's report of September 27, 2001 and Nr. Orlowski's letter of October 16, 2001 in reference to reducing the performance guarantee of Peconic Landing and concur with their findings. OCT ! 8 2001 Southc)d Tow~n Re~sp~ctfully, Ra~mond L. Ja/.d"oobs Highway Superintendent CC: Bennett Orlowski, James R~chter PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGG1ANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 16, 2001 Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Approved Site Plan for Peconic Landing at Southold SCTM#1000-35-1-25 Dear Ms. Neville: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 15, 2001: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board that the Performance Guarantee in the amount of $3,964,216.00 for Peconic Landing at Southold be reduced in the amount of $1,339,875.00. As noted in Mr. Richter's September 27, 2001 report, with the exception of the drainage pipe, all required construction items have been completed in a satisfactory manner. The Planning Board is not requiring the installation of the 233 lineal feet of 36" drainage pipe due to the location of the rock storage pile at the site. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. cc: Charles Cuddy, Esq. Dan A. Cicale, Sr. Vice President, Suffolk County National Bank JEAN W. COCHRAN SUPERVISOR TOWN I-L~.LL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (516)-765- 1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Tel. (516) -765 - 1560 September 27, 2001 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Peconic Landing - Request for Bond Reduction Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per you r request, I have reviewed the request for Bond Reduction from Retirement Living Services. My report is as follows: The proposed reduction of the Bond is indicated by the Construction Cost Estimate dated 8/20/01 and is titled Value of Work Completed. A copy of this document has been enclosed for your reference. Item # I t indicates that 233 lineal feet of 36' drainage pipe has been installed. This item, according to field inspections, has only 160 lineal feet installed due to the location of the rock storage pile at the site. This is the only modification to the proposed Bond reduction and is considered a minor change to the request. Based on the requested value of work completed and the modification to item # 1 t as listed above, the Value of Work Completed to date is one million, three hundred thirty nine thousand, eight hundred seventy five ($1,339,875.00) dollars. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. ///Oames A. Richtbr, R.A. 4 Au&mst 20, 2001 CO!qSTRUCTION COST ~T~ Prepared for ~CO~C a~ Gre~npo~, Town of Sou~old, ~w York based on Bond ~U~Ze dated Au~s~ 28, 1998 ~ep~ by To~ of Sou~old O~ce of the 1 Saw Cut A~phalt l~ement (S.R. 25) 1,500 2 C~ & G~bbln~ 69.4 3 ~o~mov~ of s~c~s JOB ~a~on 2~,~0 C.Y. ~ ~tch ~ 103 ~ Co~e M~le (4' ~J 4~ 8 18' ~ ~D.P.~ ~ ~ 9,551 9 24' Dia. ~D.P.E, ~ ~pe 2,778 LF. 10 30' ~ H.D.P,E. ~ ~ 407 ~F. 11 36' ~. ~D.P.~ ~tn~ ~pe 457 12 18~ ~. Cast ~n ~ ~ 825 14 ~k ~ w~ ~ ~ch 15 ~cast Con--re ~ I ~ch 16 ~nd ~ (2' Compacted ~ay) 3,1S6 S.Y- 1~ ~ ~adi~K 6S~000 18 Conc~te C~b~ I.S70 19 Comte ~w~ 754 20 3/4~ Stone Bl~d or ~' 6,830 C.Y. 21 ~p~t Pav~ent 14.S~ Tons 22 ~osion Consol S~cmre 3, S00 L.~- 23 ~ ~ W~ 1,166 L.F. 24 Sweet ~ee 500 ~ch 25 TopMII & Seed 85;698 S.Y. 26 S~eet ~t 175 hch 27 ~ad Res~ra~on 28 ~ro ~ ~ A~C A~nue) 4,200 29 ~s~ Pa~ 7,600 ~o $~ ~ 80 32 ~h ~ck ~ ~a JOB of ~a~fic JOB 53.00 52,S00.00 $7S,000.00 $2.50 $2.500.00 52,000.00 52.000.00 $25,00 $3o. 00 $35.00 $40,00 530.00 55,000;00 55,000.00 $10o,000.00 $1S.O0 S1-50 510.00 $30,00 $$0.00 $10.00 S150.00 $200.00 S2,00 31,500.00 55-00 31,20 510.00 $200.00 $IO.00 $4,S00,00 5173,500.00 S75,000.00 $660,000.00 $257,S00.00 $40,000.00 594'0000.00 S238.77S.00 583,340.00 $14.24S.00 $18,280.00 S24,750,00 S20.000,00 51S,000,00 51 S47,340.00 597~S00.00 SIS,?O0.O0 522.620.00 5204,900.00 5870,000.00 53S,000.00 517'4,900.00 5100,000.00 5171,396,00 $262,500.00 $6,700,00 $5.040.00 576,000.00 516,000.00 $22,230.00 57. S00.00 SI0,000.00 $ub-To~al -- + 6 % Admt~ts~ration Fee $B,964,216.00 5237,852-96 TOTAL= 54.202,068.90 08/20/2001 144 YOUN~ Au&,us~: 20, 2001 i-~OC ~/,r01~ COST ~~ for ~O~IC ~ To~ of Sout~ld PA~ 04 1 Saw Cut .amplmlt Pavemaent 0 I.F. $3.00 2 Clea.-tn8 & Grebbm8 65.93 Acres ~c~s 2~ ~1 $75,000.00 4 ~ ~a~nc~s~ied ~a~flon 211.2~ C.Y. S2.S0 5 ~h ~ 58 ~ch $2,500,~ 6 ~h~ ~1 (10' ~ X ~ deep) 20 ~ch 7 Co~e ~le (4' ~) 24 ~ $2~o00.00 9 24' ~, H.D,P.~ ~ ~ 1.356 ~F. 530.00 ~0 ~ ~a, ~D,P.~ ~a~am ~pe 407 LF. S35.00 ~ Ro~ ~m 0 ~ch $S,~0.00 ~4 Rock H~d W~ 0 ~ch $5,000.00 15 ~ca~t Con~ C~ 0 ~ch S1~.~0.~ 16 Pond ~er (2' Com~ Clay) 0 S,Y, 17 F~e Gr~ 0 S.Y. SI.SO 18 Co~ C~ 0 ~P. $10.00 1~ Co~te ~de~ o S.Y. $30.00 20 3/4' Sgo~ BI~ or ~' 0 C.Y- S30.00 21 ~p~t ~t 0 Tons S00,00 22 ~sion Con~l S~c~ 3.500 ~F. S 10.00 2~ ~ ~ W~ 1,076 LF. $1S0.00 24 S~t ~e 0 ~ch $200.00 2S Top~fl & ~ 0 S.Y. $2.00 26 $~e~ ~ 0 ~ch $1,500.00 27 ~ Resto~flon ~ ~ Ati~c A~nue) 0 ~F. $ S.O0 (~ey & A~ Avenue) 0 S.Y. $1.20 29 Pede~ ~ 0 S.Y. $10.00 31 ~ ~e 0 S.Y. S10.00 32 ~aah ~ Up ~ea 0 $0,00 $184,825;00 $15,000.00 $S28.000.00 $145.000,00 $40,000.00 $48,000.O0 S 141;325.00 $40,680.00 S14,245.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0,00 $O.00 $0.00 SO. OO S0.00 $0.00 $3S,000.00 $I61,400.'00 $0o00 $0~00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 14:35 6317e144 Ausmst 20. 2001 CONS'I~UCTION CK~T ~'FIMATE Prepared for PI/CONIC LAND]LIq~ at Greenport, Town of Southold, N~ York J~adics~ng value of Work Remmning as of August 20~ 2001 1 2 4 5 6 ? 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 3O 31 32 33 1.SO0 L.F. 53.00 3.47 Acres 52.500,00 54,S00.00 58,675.00 80~ $ 75,000.00 , $60~000.00 52,800 C.Y. S2.50 $132,000-00 45 I/ach S2,500.00 5112,~00.00 0 Each 52,000.00 S0.00 23 Each S2,000.00 $46,000.00 3,898 L.P. $25.00 $97,450.00 1,422 LF. 530.00 542,650.00 0 l~Y. 53S.00 50,00 224 1.1~. $40.00 58,960.00 825 LI~. $30.00 S24.750.00 4 ~.ach 55,000.00 5ZO,O00.O0 :3 Each S5,000.00 S 1S,O00.O0 I EaCh $100,000.00 5100,000.00 3,156 5.Y. S15.00 65,000 SiY. SI.SO S97,500.00 1.570 I.P. S 10.00 515.700.00 754 S.Y. 530.00 52:Z,620.00 6,830 C.Y. S'30.00 $20~,900.00 14,500 To~ S60.00 5870,000.Q0 0 L.F. S 10.00 S0.00 90 L.F, S1SO.O0 513.500.00 S00 Each S200.00 S 100~000.00 85,698 S.Y. $2.00 5171,396.00 175 F-ach $1,500.00 $262,500.00 1,340 Lift, $5.00 56,700.00 4.200 S.Y. 51.20 $5,040.00 7,600 S.Y. 510.00 57~,000.00 80 F. ach $200,00 2,22:3 S.Y. $10.00 $22,230.~ 10~ $7,500-00 $7,500.~ 1009/ 510.000.00 S 10,000.00 Sub-Total -- + 6 % Administration Fee -- $2,621,421.00 5157.285.26 TOTAL --- 5:~,778,706.:~6 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATI-L~M, JR. RICI-IARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 16, 2001 Charles Cuddy, Esq. P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Cuddy: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 15, 2001: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board adopt the maps, received on September 21,2001 and dated November 24, 1998, showing certain roads highlighted with a yellow marker. These roads will be paved in accordance with Town specifications with a 4" base, 2" of asphalt and then an additional 2" of asphalt. The remaining roadways, that essentially are spurs to the homes, are to be paved with a 4" base and 2" of asphalt. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Chairman cc: Building Dept. James Richter, Town Engineer TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 1 I971 Fax. (516) - 765 - 1366 Tel. (516) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 27, 2001 Bennett Odowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Peconic Landing - Request for Bond Reduction Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have reviewed the request for Bond Reduction from Retirement Living Services. My report is as follows: The proposed reduction of the Bond is indicated by the Construction Cost Estimate dated 8/20/01 and is titled Value of Work Completed. A copy of this document has been enclosed for your reference. Item # 11 indicates that 233 lineal feet of 36" drainage pipe has been installed. This item, according to field inspections, has only 160 lineal feet installed due to the location of the rock storage pile at the site. This is the only modification to the proposed Bond reduction and is considered a minor change to the request. Based on the requested value of work completed and the modification to item # 11 as listed above, the Value of Work Completed to date is one million, three hundred thirty nine thousand, eight hundred seventy five ($1,339,875.00) dollars. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. RETIREMENT LIVING SERVICES, LLC August 21, 2001 Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Dear Mr. Richter: As a condition of the construction approvals for the captioned project, a performance guarantee in the amount of $$,964,216 was established at the Suffolk County National Bank. The guarantee was provided by Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. ("Peconic Landing") as a means of guaranteeing the completion of site improvements to the satisfaction of the Town of Southold (the "Town'). I have enclosed a copy of the Performance Guarantee Agreement as a convenience. Paragraph 2. Payment of Performance Guarantee stipulates that Peconic Landing may "request release of a portion of the escrowed funds when a portion of the subject work is completed and accepted by the Town Engineer as compliant with Town requirements.' Also enclosed is a copy of correspondence from Young & Young, Peconic Landing's Civil Engineer, detailing the original Construction Cost Estimate, as well as work completed and work remaining. Peconic Landing hereby requests that the Town approve release of escrowed funds in the amount of $!,~d2,705 in addition to any accrued interest to July $1,2001. Your approval of said release should be directed to: Mr. Dan A. Cicale Senior Vice President The Suffolk County National Bank $880 Veterans Memorial Highway Bohemia, NY 11716 Acct #: 60 00 6971 32 3 100 ALLYN STK[ET · HAKTFOKD. CONNECTICUT 06103 · (860) 525-6688 · F~X (860) 525-6687 Should you have any questions, please direct them to me at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Retirement Living Services, I~ Dennis M. Wilhelm Senior Vice tt, esidcnt- Development DMW/mal Copy (including attachment): Dan A. Cicale, Sr. Vice President - Suffolk County National Bank Jean W. Cochran, Town Supervisor - Town of Southold Charles Cuddy, Esquire William G. Thompson, President - Peconic Landing Tom Wolpert, P.E. - Young & Young .1~J08/2~00 Z0:35 ~$ R QJDDY 63136~080 p,c,,~ corpom/~ with ~ pl~ ofbus~# in Sou~oki, New Yo~ ('Tecoaic Lmding"), th~ Town of ~ New York (d~ "To~n'*) md ~ (~N~ ~ m N~w York b~nking Ncw Yc~k, u Trustee (the'Tmst~e~ and by & loau from the'~mder~' ~4_,~,.~4. ~ in t~ Buil~ Fem~l, P.O. Box 430, SoulhoM, NY I1F;I, md C~B. Coddy, ~sq., P.O. Ik~x 1~?, 10;35 631369~080 Pe~:~ ~ m~:l ~ho Town d~d] h~vo fi~ lifl~ et my timo ulx~ their unanimous Gmsa~ to 6. ~ The Town and tl~ lhnk acknowfed~ tht .thi~. Pcrformance GuArantee ~ w~l be ,~_-~_o~,~ nnd posted a~ colhteral by Peconm I. and~ to or on the TrtL~__~_- or t~e Len~rz ~ w~t~ n0l~ to tJ~ tknt P~c Lan~ wl~ ~o ~n~z' per~u~n~ ~f~q$ ~C LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. TOWN 01~ 08/20/2001 14:35 6317270144 YOUNG YOUNG PAGE 82 · August 20, 2001 T,~i,,, (69 f) ?~,7,~'9o9 VIA FAX & REGULAR MAIL ATTN: Mr. Dermis M. Wilhelm, Sr. Vice Pres. Retirement Living Services 100 Allya Street Har~ord, Connecticut 06103 PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Wilhelm: Enclosed are the following items: one (1) copy - Construction Cost Estimate dated August 20. 2001 based on Bond Estimate dated August 28. 1998, one (1) copy - Construction Cost Estimate dated August 20, 2001 indicating Value of Work Completed as of August 20, 2001, and one (1) copy - Construction Cost Estimate dated August 20. 2001 indicating Value of Work Remaining as of August 20. 2001. If you have any questions regarding these estimates please contact us, TCW/dc Encl. Very truly yours, Thomas C, Wolpert YOUNG YOUNG PAGE 03 AuSust 20, 2001 CONSTI[UCTION COST 6'TIMATE Prepared for P~COI~IIC LANDI~IG at Greenport. Town of Southold, New York based on ~ond Estimate dated August 28, 1998 Prepared by Tow~ of Southold Office of the Enfizleer 1 saw Cut Asphalt Pavement (S.IC 25) 1,500 L-F. $3.00 2 Clem'lng & Grubbing 69.4 Acres S~c~s JOB 4 ~0~ Gr~~sffied 6 ~acbin~ Pool (10' ~. X ~ d~p) 20 ~ch S2,000.~ 7 Coyote M~le (4' ~.) 47 ~ch ~2,000.00 8 18' ~. ~D.P.E. ~na~ ~ 9,551 ~F. [25,00 9 24' ~Q. H.D-P.~ ~ ~ 2,778 L.P. 10 30' Dia. H.D.P,E. ~e ~ 407 L.F. $33.00 11 36' ~. H.D.P.~ ~ ~ 457 L-F. 12 18' ~a. ~st ~n ~ ~ 82S L.P. S30-00 13 ~k ~m 4 ~Ch S5,000,00 14 ~Ck Head W~ 3 ~ch 15 ~ecast Co~ete ~ 1 16 ~nd ~er (2' Competed ~ay) 3,156 S.Y* $15.00 17 F~ ~a~ 65,000 S.Y. Sl.50 18 Concrete C~b~ 1,S70 L.F. S10.00 19 Co~te ~hw~ 754 S.Y. 20 3/4' Stone Blend or ~' 6,830 C-Y. 21 ~p~t Pavement 14,500 Tons $60.00 22 ~sion Consol S~cmre ~,500 L.F. $10.00 2~ ~o~ ~ W~ 1,166 ~F. S150.00 24 S~eet ~ee 500 ~ch ~200.~ g5 Top~il & ~ed 85,698 S.Y. 26 S~et ~t 175 ~cb 27 ~ad Res~ora~oa (~ey · A~Uc A~nue) 1,340 LF. $5.00 Z8 ~cro S~ac~g (~ ~ Atle~c A~ue) 4,200 S,Y, S 1.20 29 ~des~ Fa~ 7,600 S.Y. $10.00 ~0 S~et ~ 80 ~ch $200.00 31 ~ ~e 2.223 S.Y. $10.00 32 ~h ~ck Up ~a JOB of Traffic JOB $4,500.00 $17B,500.00 S75.000.00 S75,000.00 $660,000.00 $257,5OO.00 $40,000,00 S94,000.00 $238.77S.00 S8~,340,00 $14,245.00 $1~,2BO.00 $24,750.00 S20,000,00 S 1S,O00.O0 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $47,340.00 $97,500.00 S150700.00 S22.620.00 $204,900.00 S870,000.00 $35,000.00 S 174,900.00 $100.000.00 $171,396.00 $252,500.00 $6,700.00 $S.040.00 $76,000.00 $16,000,00 $22,230.00 $7,500.00 S10,000.00 Sub-To~al -- Administration Fee ? $B,964,216.00 $237.852.96 TOTAL ---= S4.:ZO2,0~8.g& YOUNG YOUNG 04 August :20, 200! COIqST~I]~. · iON COST F,-~MEA~'~ Prepared for PECONIC LANDING at G~eenport, Tolam of Southold, New Yprk indi~rti~ Value ~rE W~rk Completed~ as of August 20, 200! 1 SaW Cut Asphal~ P&ve~aent 0 L.F. SB.00 2 C1eartn~ & Grubbing 65.9:3 Acres 3 ~mo~e~v~ of S~c~es 2~ Co~l $75,000-00 4 Ro~ Grant.sifted ~a~on 211.2~ C.Y. ~2.S0 7 Conc~le MsnNole (4' ~-) ~4 ~ch $2~000.00 9 24' ~. ~.D,P.~. ~i~a~ ~ 1,3~6 ~F. ~30.00 !0 30' ~a. H.D,P.E. ~e ~ 407 ~. 13 ROC~ ~m 0 ~ch $5,O00.00 14 Rock Head W~ 0 ~ch 15 ~cast Co~ C~g 0 ~ $1~,000.00 16 Pond ! inet (2' Com~c~d Clay) 0 S.Y. 18 Co~ C~ 0 ~F. $10.00 19 Coat.re ~de~ o S.Y. SBO.~ 20 3/4' Stone ~le~ or ~' 0 C-Y. $30.~ 22 ~sion ConSol S~c~ 3.500 ~F. S 10.00 23 ~ ~ W~ 1,076 L.F. $150.00 2g S~ ~e 0 ~ch $200.00 25 Top~ll & ~ 0 S.Y. 26 S~et ~ 0 ~ch $1.500.00 27 Ro~ Re~torafioa (~ ~ Atl~Uc A~ue) 0 LF. $5.00 (~y & A~ Avenue) 0 S.Y. 51.20 30 S~ee~ ~ 0 ~ch ~200.00 31 P~ l~--e 0 S.Y. S10.00 32 ~uh ~ck Up ~ea 0 33 M~e & ~t~on of ~e 0 $0.00 5164,825.00 $150000-00 5528.000.00 145.000,00 $40,0oo.oo $48,ooo.oo 5141,325.00 $40,680.00 $14.24S.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $35,000.00 $161,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00 $0,00 50.00 88/20/2801 YOUNG YOUNG August 20, 2001 CONSTltUCT~OI~ COST Prepared for P~CONIC ~t Gr~po~, ~own of Southold, N~ YOrk ~dlca~ V~ue of Work R~ as of Au~st 20, 2~1 1 Saw Cu~ Asphalt Pavement 2 CAe~ & Grubbin~ Demoli~i~n~emov~l of 4 Rough Excavation 5 Ca,ch B~ ~a~h~ Pool (10' ~. X ~ ~) Con~ ~le (a' ~) 8 18' ~a. H,D~.E. 24' ~. 12 18' ~, Ro~ ~m 14 R~ ~a~ 15 ~cas~ Co.rede 16 ~d ~ (2' Co~c~ed Clay) 17 ~e 18 Con~te 19 Co~te 21 ~p~x P~v~en~ 22 ~osion Con~l S~c~e 24 S~eet ~ 25 To~oU & 26 S~et 27 ~ Re~toraUon (~ey · A~c Avenue) 28 ~ (~ey & Atl~c A~nue) 29 ~des~ ~et ~h ~ck 33 ~nt~ce & ~tec~on of ~fic 1.SO0 LP. $3.00 $4,500.00 3.47 Acres S2,500.00 $8,075.00 80% $ 75,000.00 $60,000.00 52,800 C-Y. $2.$0 45 I/ach $2,500.00 0 Each S2,000.00 23 ~ch $2,000.00 3,898 LF. $25.00 1,422 L-F- S30-00 0 I~F. $35.00 224 I-P. $40.00 825 LF. S30.00 4 Each $5,000.00 3 Hach $5,000.00 3.156 $.Y, $15.00 65,000 S.Y. SI.SO 1.570 L.F, $10.00 754 S.Y. I30.00 6,830 C.Y. $30.00 14,500 Tons $60.00 0 L.F, S 10.00 90 LF, S1SO.O0 SO0 Each S200.00 85,698 5.Y. $2.00 175 Each S 1,500.00 1,340 LF, S5.00 $132,000.00 $112,S00.00 $0.00 $46,000.00 $97,450.00 S42,660.00 $0.00 $8,960.00 $24.750.00 SZO 0oo.00 $15 000.00 $100 000.00 $47 340.00 S97 qO0.O0 S15 700.00 $22 G20.O0 $2O4 900.00 $8?0 000.00 $0.00 S 100.000.00 $171.396.00 $262,S00.00 $6,700.00 4,200 S.Y. Sl.20 S5,040.00 7,600 S.Y. $10.00 $76,000.00 80 Each $200.00 S 16,000.00 2,223 S.Y. $10.00 $22,230.00 1009~ $?,500.00 S7,$00.00 10096 S 10,000.00 S 10.000.00 Sub-Total -- + 6 % Administration ]Fee $2,$21,421.00 $157.285.26 TOTAL ---- SZ,778,TO6.Z6 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1547 Riverhea~t, NY 11901 CHARLES R. CUDDY ATTORNEY AT L AW 445 GRI FfqNG AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK September 20, 2001 TEL: (631) ~29-8200 FAX: (631) 369-9080 H~mai[: crcuddy@earth]ink.net Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing Gentlemen: outl, e'd 'own Planning Board Pursuant to Peconic Landing's discussion with the Planning Board involving the Board, Mr. Richter, Young & Young by Howard Young and Tom Wolpert, RLS by Tim Caron and myself, 1 have enclosed three copies of a general layout map which has been highlighted with a yellow marker. In accordance with our discussion and conclusion, as approved by the Board, the highlighted areas are to be paved in accordance with Town specifications with a 4" base, 2" of asphalt and then an additional 2" of asphalt. The remaining roadways, that is essentially the spurs to the homes, are to be paved with a 4" base and 2" of asphalt. Upon further consideration our engineers have indicated that it would be appropriate to have the boulevard paved with the additional asphalt covering so that the boulevard also will be a 4" base. 2" of asphalt and an additional 2" of asphalt. We understand the foregoing is in accordance with the Board's approval and that the Board has, therefore, adopted a resolution permitting us to proceed in this fashion. If there is any misunderstanding or error in what has been here set forth, please promptly advise me in writing or other~vise we will proceed accordingly. Thank you for hearing our concerns and acting upon them. CRC:JML Enclosures Very truly yours, Charles R. Cudd} cc: James Richter PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Peconic Landing Route 25, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 September 18, 2001 Please review the performance Bond for reduction, HOWARD W. YOtlllg, Leml 2un~e'~,. THOIJA.~ e. WOLPERT, Pmf~ene~ VIA FAX & REGULAR MAIL September 4, 2001 A~-rN: Mr. Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: PECONIC LANDING At Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) L 8EP 0 5 20ul Southold Town Planning Board Dear Mr. Kassner: Thank you for your prompt response to our August 14, 2001 letter requesting permission to vary the paving specifications from those shown on the site plan approved by the Town of Southold Planning Board on August 31, 1998. Please be advised that we intend to commence paving of the roads in conformance with the road section depicted on the approved site plan (copy enclosed), as specified in your August 21, 2001 letter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us. TCW/sjt Encl. CC: Southold Town Office of the Engineer ATt'N: Mr. James A. Richter, R.A. Retirement Living Services A~-I'N: Mr. Dennis M. Wilhelm Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. + Encl. + Encl. + Encl. FINISHED GRAOE ~ \ \ L TO BE TRIMMED 5C THAT ,~ HEIGHT OF % ABOVE ROAO W~[}TH IS CLEARED ~ i.00' i2.00' TWO-'NM/ -RAFFIC &O0' ONE-WAY TRAFFIC 2.00% CROWN ,, 12.00' TWO-WAY TRAFFIC 8.00' ONE-WAY TRAFFIC ~-2" ASPHALT PAVEMENT 4" RECYCLED CONCRETE STABILIZED SOIL BASE 1 00' - ¢" TOPSOIL ROAD SECTION PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNI~TT ORLOWSKI, JR. Cho2rman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 21, 2001 Thomas C. Wolpert Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Peconic Landing Route 25, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Wolpert, The Planning Board has received your letter of August 14, 2002, regarding varying the road specifications. The roads must be built as comained in the Town Code, Chapter A 108 Highway Specifications, and the approved site plan. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please contact this office. Site Plan Reviewer Cc: James Richter, Town Engineer JEAN W. COCHRAN SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (516)-765- 1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 'Fei. (516) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Odowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: August 17, 2001 Re: PECONIC LANDING Letter from Young & Young Revised Pavement Specifications Requesting I have received a copy of the above referenced letter and offer the following comments. This letter indicates that the approved site plan included a road section that was different from the required highway specifications listed in the Town Code. I have reviewed the file and specifically the Bond Estimate Calculations. All of my notes and calculations were consistent with compliance with Town Highway Specifications. The existing precedent that has been established by the Planning Board would require all construction, including roads that will remain in the private domain, to meet the minimum Highway Specifications. Several projects within the Town, consisting of roads that will remain private, have recently been completed. In all cases the developer was required to and did meet the minimum construction requirements of the Town code. The read section proposed by Mr. Wolpert's letter does not include the 4" thick Stone Blend or RCA Base material that is required by code. The additional 6" stabilized soil base indicated in the letter was a requirement for the construction of temporary roads that have been used for site access and building construction. The fact that the sub-base for these roads were stabilized to accommodate construction traffic and emergency vehicular access to the site should not be considered additional road construction. The required road construction for all main roadways within the scope of this project should be as follows: 4" - %" Stone Blend (or RCA) Base Course 2-1/2" ~ Asphalt Binder Course 1-1/2" - Asphalt Wearing Course If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. AUG 17 2001 /~ James AYRict~ter, R.~. (6§1) 227-0144 HOWARD W. YOUI, IP,, Lend THOklAg C. WOLPEI~T, Pmf~orm~ August 14, 2001 Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: PECONIC LANDING At Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) SoutholdTown Dear Members of the Board: Kindly consider this request, on behalf of Peconic Landing at Southold, Thc., for approval to vary the paving specifications from those shown on the Site Plan approved by the Town of Southold Planning Board on August 31, 1998. For reference, please note that the approved Site Plan depicted the following road section: 2" asphalt pavement (wearing course) 4" recycled concrete (base course) 6" stabilized soil base (sub-base) The proposed alternate road section is as follows: 1W' asphalt top course 21/2" asphalt binder course 6" stabilized soil base (wearing course) (base course) (sub-base) The alternate road section is proposed for the main roadways within the site as highlighted in yellow on the General Layout (Sheet i of 13) last dated November 24, 1998 (copy attached). Page 2 August 14, :2001 This method of construction will enable the contractor to stabilize the roads and control dust during construction of the remaining sections of the project. The :L 1/2" asphalt top course will be placed following completion of most of the heavy construction thereby providing the residents with a fresh wearing course. The previously approved road section will apply to the remaining paved areas not highlighted on the attached plan. Thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, TCW/mal Encl, Thomas C. Wolpert cc: $outhold Town Office of the Engineer + Encl. A'I-FN: ]ames A. Richter, R.A. STATE Of NEW YORK DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMOriaL HighWAY HauPPaUgE, N.Y. 11788 CRAIG SIRACLISA, F~E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR JOSEPH H. BOARE)MAN COMMISSIONER August 1, 2001 Mr. Thomas c. Wolpert, P.E. Young and Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Dear Mr. Wolpert: Your April 11, 2001 Submission. Peconic Landing at Southold Route 25 Greenport SCTM 1000-35-1-25 Our Case No. 97-263P Southold Town Planni Board This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to issuing a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. Show the typical widths on the plan at Station 26+90 to denote new pavement and shoulder. Add the following NYSDOT items to the plans; line stripe removal, temporary sheet piling, trench and culvert excavation and backfill, raise and reset manhole cover, fire hydrant relocation and water main offset. 3. Add a Sign Text Data sheet for all existing and proposed traffic signs. Remove "No Left Turn" sign from West Intersection detail and install on the northeast comer of the East Intersection detail. 5. Add "Right Turn Only" signs below the proposed stop signs at the east and west driveway. 6. Add the following details: 1. Standard details for drain basin excavation/relocation. 2. Use Type 5 pedestrian ramps at each driveway. 3. Add cross-section of driveway detail including the gutter line. 4. Show slope limit and thickness of shoulder treatment on south side of Route 25. Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. August 1, 2001 Page 2 5. Add invert elevations and Table of Drainage Structures on the plan. Show double yellow barrier lines for an additional 50 feet north of the proposed channelizing island at each driveway. Revise Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plans to depict lane shift scheme with minimum 11 feet width maintained at all times. Kindly submit four sets of the revised plans, permit fee and surety bond (sample enclosed). It is also mandatory that protective liability insurance be provided by the permittee. This must be accomplished by submitting a completed Perm 17, Certificate of Insurance, in accordance with Option A (form enclosed), or by submitting the fee specified below to be covered under the NYSDOT Blanket Policy. Also enclosed is a Highway Work Permit Application to be completed and returned to us. The application, completed Perm 17 and the Surety Bond must be secured by the same party. All checks issued to the State of New York must show a Federal Identification Number. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): $550.00 Bond Amount: $160,000 Insurance Fee: $175.00 Consultant inspection will be required for this project. Kindly return the enclosed consultant agreement forms with the permit documents. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Dan Herlihy at (631) 952-6020. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, /~'i? ~ ,~'~92[~~ A. W. BACHNER, P.E. Civil Engineer Ill Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southol~ Mr. Raymond Jacobs, Town of Southold AWB:DH:JS 0~/3012002 Southold Town Aw. hitocturol Review Commit~e Minutes of meeting Septenbtr 12, 2002 Yah Relier Gtrrett Stran8 Howard Melnlte H~l*bert AdleF Robert Brown Hurt's Hardware: Present: P~t Moore Mr, G~dtle Southold Town Plannina Board Siding and roofing samples Fequested were preseated and approved. Plumbing and exhaust vt~ are to bt relocated ~o hiddm ddes ef roo£ Exterior flood lights are to be ued to Oludaate sign only. Howard M. moved to sccepi wJlb the shave conditions. Seeoud by Herb A. a~epted unanimously. Present: T~m Woiper~ Youui & Young Dennis WUb~J~, ~ Site sip was preuuted. Herbert A, moved to accept, Second by Howard M. aeoopted unHimou~. First Baptist Church Prme~t: Ms. llerold Color ruder~d drowh~ of sJgu was prumttt Change in roofline at entry (rohtng idgher)~ and etve line wlu Gsrrett S. moved m approve with ehana~ Yah IL Second. St. Peter's I~thertu ChuFeh Present: Ms. Heroid RPZ valve botbtt was pFeseuted Yah R. moved to n____~ Garrett S..eeond. YOUNG & YOUNG HOWARD IV, YOUNG, Land Surv~, or THOMAS C. WOLPERT, Profe~iona! £n~eer I~OIqERT C. TAST, ArchtMct Tde-ptwne (651) 727-2303 Fac~r~ile (631) 727~0144 FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE:,. /l~t,'4~ ~'Ir''''/'' TO: . AT-f N:.. FAX #: ,. FROM' SUBJECT: __~~ LGl'e'lol, h ~ NO. OF PAGES: I G, ) ?.oo ~. .... q'7-- O~.qO (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) COMMENTS: I ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 839 OF 2002 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON DECEMBER 17, 2002: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes the reduction of the performance bond for the mai or subdivision of Peconic Landing from $1~670,836.00 to $132,000.00 all in accordance with the recommendation of the Southold Town Planning Board, the Town Engineer, and the Superintendent of Highways, and subject to the approval of the Town Attorney. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk AC. ORD. CERTIFICA OF LIABILITY INSURAI E O..D ~ ~'rDN01N [ 01/09/03 ~RO'DUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Sing'ar Ne'leon Ch&rZmers ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE P O Box 16 HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 1086 Te&neck Roa~l., 5th Floor ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Tee-~eck NJ 07666-0016 Phone: 201 - 837-1100 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # Sidney B. Bowie & Son, LLP 275 E. Jericho _T~ke~ Box 109 ~NSURSSD: Security Ins. Co. of Hartfo3d Mlneola NY 11501-0109 COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF iNSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. N~H ~UU't POUCY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LTR NSR[ TYPE OF INSURANCE POUCY NUMBER DATE (MMIDD/YY) DATE (MM/DD/YY) LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1 · 000 · 000 A X X COMME RC~AL G EN ERAL LIAB;LITY 3M(~B12291- 00 12/31/02 12/31/03 PREMISES {Ea occurence) $ 50~000 I CLA~S M^DE IXl OCCUB MED EXP(~O~be~O.) $ 5, 000 PERSONAL&ADVINJURY $ 1~000·000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $2·000·000 GEN'L AGGBEGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMPIOP AGG $ ~· 000,000 PRO- AUTOMOBILE EABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT B ~- ANYAUTO F3R05138300 12/31/02 12/31/03 (Eaaccident) $1,000,000 ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY iNJURY -- SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per PeaS°n) $ HIRED AGTOS BODILY INJURY -- NON.OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) $ __ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILfTY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC ~ $ AUTO ONLY: AGG $ EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABIMTY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 10, 000 a 000 C ~ OCCUR ~J CLAIMSMADE [Rff. N/3LD002300 12/31/02 12/31/03 AGGREGATE $ 10, 000, 000 DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ $ B ANY EMPLOYERS' LIASIUTY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTiVE 3BGl14016-00 12/31/02 12/31/03 ~.L* EACH ACCIDENT s 1,000,000 OFFICERfl~EMBER EXCLUDED? E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYS( $ 1, 000 · 000 if s. describe under S~eEClAL PROVISIONS below E.L DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1, 000, 000 D Professional ABE0223280 06/11/02 06/11/03 2,000,000 each cl&im Liability 2,000,000 annual aggr DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS / VEHICLES / EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT / SPECIAL PROVISIONS Cer~ficate Holder 4s named as add~tional ~neured as resDecte to general l~.~:~il:[ty only. I~I PECONIC I~&IDING PROO'~CT. CERTIFICATE HOLDER TOWN OF SOD~I~OLD TOWN HALL PO BOX 1179 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTBOLD NY 11971 ACORD 25 (2001/08) TOWSO05 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 3 0 DAYS WRITrEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO OD SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBUGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. ~ ACORD CORPORATION 1988 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 December 17, 2002 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southeld, NY 11971 RE: Peconic Landing SCTM#1000-35-1-25 Dear Ms. Neville: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 16, 2002: RESOLVED, to adopt the revised Bond Estimate in the amount of $132,000.00, dated March 5, 2002, for Peconic Landing, as determined by the Town Engineer, and recommend same to the Town Board. The revised Bond Estimate indicates the percentage of construction items completed to date and reflects the estimated cost of work remaining. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr.'~'- / Chairman enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 December 17, 2002 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Charles Cuddy, Esq. P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Peconic Landing SCTM#1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Cuddy: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 16, 2002: RESOLVED, to adopt the revised Bond Estimate in the amount of $132,000.00, dated March 5, 2002, for Peconic Landing, as determined by the Town Engineer, and recommend same to the Town Board. The revised Bond Estimate indicates the percentage of construction items completed to date and reflects the estimated cost of work remaining. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Chairman enc. JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax (516)-765-1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK I 1971 Tel(516)-765 -1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 7, 2002 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Peconic Landing Request for Bond Reduction Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, enclosed please find a revised bond estimate that indicates the amount of work completed to date. I have also enclosed a copy of the inspection report from the consulting engineers office as prepared by Mr. Gino Aiello, PE. At this time I agree with the findings of the consultant and would recommend the reduction of the current Bond. The New Bond Total has been adjusted to represent the quantity of work remaining and should be in the amount of $132,000.00. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. CC: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) Gino Aiello, PE (Sidney J3. Bowne & Son, LLP) ITEM L 6. 7. 8. 9. 14. 15. 18. 20. 22. 23 24 25. 26. 27 28. 29. 30 31. 32. 33. JOSHUA Y.HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax (516)-765 - 1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER 'IOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel (516)-765-1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF $OUTHOLD BOND ESTIMATE ~ PECONIC LANDING SCTM # 1000-35-01-25 Revised: March 5, 2002 TOTAL BOND qUANTITY 1,500 LF. 69.4 ACRE JOB 264,000 C.Y. 103 EACH 20 EACH 47 EACH 9,551 L.F. 2,778 L.F. 407 L.F. 457 L.F. 825 LF. 4 EACH 3 EACH I EACH 3,156 SY. 65,000 SY 1,570 L.F. 754 S.Y 6,830 C.Y. 14,500 TONS 3,500 L.F 1,166 L.F. 500 EACH 85,698 S.Y 175 EACH 1,340 LF. 4,200 SY 7,600 SY. 80 EACH 2,223 SY. )'OB JOB BOND (+/-) % DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT COMPLETE SAW CUT PAVEMENT (S.R. 25) $ 3.00 $ 4,500.00 100% CLEARING & GRUBB lNG 2,500.00 173,500.00 100% DEMOLITION of STRUCTURES 75,000.00 100% ROUGH GRADING / UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 2.50 660,000.00 100% CATCH BASINS 2,500.00 257,500.00 100% LEACHING POOL (10' Dia. X T deep) 2,000.00 40,000.00 100% CONCRETE MANHOLE (4' Dim) 2,000.00 94,000.00 100% 18" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 25.00 238,775.00 100% 24" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 83,340.00 100% 30" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 35.00 14,245.00 100% 36" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 40.00 18,280.00 100% 18" DIA CAST IRON DRAINAGE P1PE 30.00 24,750.00 100% ROCK DAM 5,000.00 20,000.00 75% ROCK HEADWALL 5,000.00 15,000.00 100% PP,.ECAST CONCRETE CULVERT 100,000.00 100,000.00 100% POND LINER (2' Compacted Clay) 15.00 47,340.00 100% FINE GRADING 1.50 97,500.00 100% CONCRETE CURBING 10.00 15,700 00 100% CONCRETE SIDEWALK 30.00 22,620 00 100% V4" STONE BLEND or RCA BASE 30.00 204,900.00 100% ASPHALT PAVEMENT 60.00 870,000.00 100% EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURE 10.00 35,000.00 100% MASONRY RETAINING WALL 150.00 174,900.00 100% STREET TREE 200.00 100,000.00 0% TOPSOIL & SEED 2.00 171,396.00 100% STREET LIGHTS 1,500.00 262,500.00 100% ROAD RESTORATION (Bailey & Atlantic) 5.00 6,700.00 100% MICRO SURFACING (Bailey & Atlantic) 1.20 5,040.00 100% PEDESTRIAN PATH I 0.00 76,000.00 0% STREET SIGNS 200.00 16,000.00 t00% FIRE LANE 10.00 22,230.00 100% TILASH PICK UP AREA 7,500.00 100% MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 10,000.00 90% qUANTITY REMAINING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l EACH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 EACH 0 0 0 0 7,600 S.Y. 0 0 0 10% VALUE REMAINING $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 ORIGINAL BOND TOTAL: $ 3,964,216.00 REMAINING BOND AMOUNT FOR INCOMPLETE CONSTRUCTION ITEMS $ 132,000.00 PETER W. HARRIS Superintendent Highway Department Town of Southold 275 Peconic Lane · P.O. Box 178 Peconic, N.Y. 11958-0178 Tel. (631) 765-3140 (631) 734-5211 Fax (631) 765-1750 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MEMORANDUM Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Southold Town Planning Department Peter W. Harris, Superintendent Southold Town Highway Department November 27, 2002 PECONIC LANDING -PERFORMANCE BOND REDUCTION SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP NOS: 1000-35-1-25 In connection with the above, please be advised at this time I am in agreement with the Town Engineer, James A. Richter, pursuant to the findings of the consultant and recommend reduction of the current bond. The new bond total has been adjusted to represent the quantity of work remaining and should now be in the amount of $132,000.00. Attachment PWH:jes DEC u ~ zuoZ Southold Town P!annin(~ Board VALERIE SCOPAZ, AICP TOWN PLANNER P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 Valerie. Scopaz~own.southold.ny.us OFFICE OF THE TOWN PLANNER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 25, 2002 Charles Cuddy, Esq. 445 Griffing Avenue Riverhead, New York, 11901 RE: Performance Bond Reduction for Peconic Landing SCTM#1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Cuddy: This is in response to your client's request for a reduction in the performance bond for the above-referenced project. The Planning Board has agreed to accept Mr. Richter's recommendation, if the Highway Superintendent agrees, this proposed reduction will be sent to the Town Board at our next public meeting in December. A copy of Mr. Richter's recommendation is attached for your convenience. Very truly yours, Valerie Scopaz, AICP v Town Planner encl. CC; James Richter, Town Engineer Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk O) JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR ~OWN HAL[. - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax 1516)-765 1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHO[ D, NEW YORK 11971 Tel 1516)-765 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 7, 2002 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Peconic Landing Request for Bond Reduction Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, enclosed please find a revised bond estimate that indicates the amount of work completed to date. I have also enclosed a copy of the inspection report from the consulting engineers office as prepared by Mr. Gino Aiello, PE. At this time I agree with the findings of the consultant and would recommend the reduction of the current Bond. The New Bond Total has been adjusted to represent the quantity of work remaining and should be in the amount of $132,000.00. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. CC: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) S Gino Aiello, PE (Sidney B, Bowne & Son, LLP) JOSHUA Y.HORTON JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR ENGINEER TOWN ttALL 53095 MAIN ROAD TOWN OF SOUTIiOLD, NEW kOiCK 1197 ~ Fax (516)-765 - 1366 Tel (516)- 765 I560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOED BOND ESTIMATE ~ PECONIC LANDING SCTM # 1000-35-01-25 Revised: March 5, 2002 ITEM 1. 2. 3 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 12. 16. 17 19. 20~ 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32 33. TOTAL BOND BOND {+/-) % QUANTITY VALUE QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT COMPLETE REMAINING REMAINING 1,500 L.F. SAW CUT PAVEMENT (S.R. 25) $ 3.00 $ 4,500.00 100% 0 $ 0.00 69.4 ACRE CLEARING & GRUBBING 2,500.00 173,500.00 100% 0 0.00 JOB DEMOLITION of STRUCTURES 75,000.00 100% 0 0.00 264,000 C.Y. ROUGH GRADING / UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 2.50 CATCH BASINS 2,500.00 103 EACH 20 EACH 47 EACH 9,551 L.F. 2,778 L.F. 407 L.F. 457 L.F. 825 L.F. 4 EACH 3 EACH I EACH 3,156 S.Y 65,000 SY 1,570 L.F 754 S.Y. 6,830 C.Y. 14,500 TONS 3,500 L.F. 1,166 L.F. 500 EACH 85,698 S.Y. 175 EACH 1,340 L.F. 4,200 S.Y. 7,600 S.Y. 80 EACH 2,223 S.Y. JOB JOB 660,000.00 257,500.00 LEACHING POOL (10' Dia. X 7' deep) 2,000.00 40,000.00 CONCRETE MANHOLE (4' Dia.) 2,000.00 94,000.00 18" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 25.00 238,775.00 24' DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 83,340.00 30" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 35.00 14,245.00 36" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 40.00 18,280.00 18" DIA CAST IRON DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 24,750.00 ROCK DAM 5,000.00 20,000.00 ROCK HEADWALL 5,000.00 15,000.00 PRECAST CONCRETE CULVERT 100,000.00 100,000.00 POND LINER (2' Compacted Clay) l 5.00 47,340.00 FINE GRADING 1.50 97,500.00 CONCRETE CkFRBING 10.00 15,70000 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 30.00 22,620.00 3/4" STONE BLEND or RCA BASE 30.00 204,900.00 ASPHALT PAVEMENT 60.00 870,000.00 EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURE 1000 35,000.00 MASONRY RETAINING WALL 150.00 174,900.00 STREET TREE 200.00 100,000.00 TOPSOIL & SEED 2.00 171,396.00 STREET LIGHTS 1,500.00 262,500.00 ROAD RESTORATION (Bailey & Atlantic) 5.00 6,700.00 MICRO SURFACING (Bailey & Atlantic) 1.20 5,040.00 PEDESTRIAN PATH 10.00 76,000.00 STREET SIGNS 200.00 16,000.00 FIRE LANE 10.00 22,230.00 TRASH PiCK UP AREA 7,500.00 MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 10~000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 75% 1EACH 5,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 0% 250 EACH 50,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 0% 7,600 S.Y. 76,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 90% 10% 1,000.00 ORIGINAL BOND TOTAL: $ 3,964,216.00 REMAINING BOND AMOUNT FOR INCOMPLETE CONSTRUCTION ITEMS $ 132,000.00 RET1BJ{MENT LI'¢LNG ~R¥',C~$, ItC T-6T9 =gOI/~OZ :-IZ5 100 ALLYN STREET HARTFORD, CT 0610.~ FACSIMILE TRANSMITI'AL SH£ET Attn: Caxol Jamle Richter CompalTy: Town of ~uthold Fa×Number: 631-765.3',36 Phone Number: Re: PECONIC LANlblNC, From: Denny Wilhelm Date: Novcmbvr 15,2002 To~al No. of Paf.ea Including Cover: 2 Sendm"s Ref*re,l¢¢ Nu. mber: 70 Your Refermoe Number: l-'] URGENT [~ FOKKEVIEW [-I PLEASE COMME, NT ["3 PLEA iE REPLY [] PLEASE RECYCLE The original ofthi~ document will be sent b,~: j R egular Mail Messenger [] Overnight 5~il [] Thi~ will be' the only form of delivery of this docu NOTES/COMMENTS: Plo~se see ~n~lo~ed DOT certitleat~. Denny PHONE (860) 5Z5 6688 F.~X: ~"'fi687 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 70: P~rmit #[0-0 ~.-0399 NY 25 (~ Manhasset Ave Pecontc Landing Gr,~port, Suffolk County The roadway improvement pem~.t has been inipcoted and all pun;hlist items ~re complete to the s~is~action of~e engLqeer. No fi:rther s/tework i~ require,! un~ the permit agreement, l~'you have any tlu~orm regarding INs matter> dc) not he:~itate to contact me, 447~7155, cc: Bart Howe/C. Vit~liti PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLO~SKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS ILENNETH L, EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-9959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: November 13, 2002 To: tear Harris, Superintendent of Highways From: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner J ~f77~ Re: Pcconic Landing Bond Reduction Please let the Planning Board know if you agree with Jamie Richter's recommendation to reduce Peconic Landing's bond as noted in his November 7th letter, which is attached. JOSHUA Y. HORTON S UPER¥ISOR lOgaN HAL[ 53095 MAIN ROAD l,ax (516)-765 1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOkD, NEW YORK I 1971 l'eL (516) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 7, 2002 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Re: Peconic Landing Request for Bond Reduction Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, enclosed please find a revised bond estimate that indicates the amount of work completed to date. I have also enclosed a copy of the inspection report from the consulting engineers office as prepared by Mr. Gino Aiello, PE. At this time I agree with the findings of the consultant and would recommend the reduction of the current Bond. The New Bond Total has been adjusted to represent the quantity of work remaining and should be in the amount of $132,000.00. you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. CC: S Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) Gino Aiello, PE (Sidney B. Bowne & Son, LLP) JOSHUA Y.HORTON SUPERVISOR IOWN HA[.i - 53093 IVlAIN ROAD Fax (5[6) 76~-t366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER Tel (516) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF $ODTHOLD BOND ESTIMATE ~ PECONIC LANDING SCTM # 1000-35-01-25 E, evised: March 5, 2002 TOTAL BOND ITEM QUANTITY 1. 1,500 L.F. 2. 69.4 ACRE 3. JOB 4. 264,000 C.Y. 5. 103 EACH 6. 20 EACH 7. 47 EACH 8. 9,551 L.F. 9. 2,778 L.F. 10. 407 L.F. 1 I. 457 L.F. 12. 825 L.F. 13. 4 EACH 14. 3 EACH 15 1 EACH I6. 3,156 S.Y. 17 65,000 S.Y. 18. 1,570 L.F. 19. 754 S.Y. 20. 6,830 C.Y. 21. 14,500 TONS 22. 3,500 L.F. 23. 1,166 L.F. 24. 501) EACH 25. 85,698 SY. 26. 175 EACH 27. 1,340 L.F. 28. 4,200 S.Y 29. 7,600 S.Y. 30 80 EACH 31. 2,223 S.Y. 32. JOB 33. JOB DESCRIPTION SAW CUT PAVEMENT (S.R. 25) $ 3.00 CLEARING & GRUBBING 2,500.00 DEMOLITION of STRUCTURES ROUGH GRADiNG / UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 2.50 CATCH BASINS 2,500.00 UNIT PRICE BOND {+/-} % QUANTITY VALUE AMOUNT COMPLETE REMAINING REMAINING 4,500.00 100% 0 $ 0.00 173,500.00 100% 0 0.00 75,000.00 100% 0 0.00 660,000.00 257,500.00 LEACHING POOL (10' Dia. X 7' deep) 2,000.00 40,000.00 CONCRETE MANHOLE (4' Dia.) 2,000.00 94,000.00 18" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 25.00 238,775.00 24" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 83,340.00 30" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PiPE 35.00 14,245.00 36" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 40.00 18,280.00 18" D1A CAST IRON DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 24,750.00 ROCK DAM 5,000.00 20,000.00 ROCK HEADWALL 5,000.00 15,000.00 PRECAST CONCRETE CULVERT 100,000.00 100,000.00 POND LINER (2' Compacted Clay) 15.00 47,340.00 FINE GRADING 1.50 97,500.00 CONCRETE CURBING I 0.00 15,700.00 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 30.00 22,620.00 ¥4" STONE BLEND or RCA BASE 30.00 204,900.00 ASPHALT PAVEMENT 60.00 870,000.00 EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURE 10.00 35,000.00 MASONRY RETAINING WALL 150.00 174,900.00 STREET TREE 200.00 100,000.00 TOPSOIL & SEED 2.00 171,396.00 STREET LIGHTS 1,500.00 262,500.00 ROAD RESTORATION (Bailey & Atlantic) 5.00 6,700.00 MICRO SURFACING (Bailey & Atlantic) 1.20 5,040.00 PEDESTRIAN PATH 10.00 76,000.00 STREET SIGNS 200.00 16,000.00 FIRE LANE 10.00 22,230.00 TRASH PICK UP AREA 7,500.00 MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 10,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 75% IEACH 5,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 I00% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 0% 250 EACH 50,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 0% 7,600 S.Y. 76,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 90% 10% 1,000.00 ORIGINAL BOND TOTAL: $ 3,964,216.00 REMAINING BOND AMOUNT FOR INCOMPLETE CONSTRUCTION ITEMS $ 132,000.00 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE Date: //// ~;~ /(~ ~., .~m~: ~-~..,'~Z,'~.7' ;~. o Mailing Address: SCTM# of site you are inquiring about: Query: (Please be specific about the information you need. Provide supporting documentation - surveys, maps, sketches - where possible.) Southold Town Hanninfl Board For Off/ce Use Only: Routed to: ~/~ JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR I'OWN HALL 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax (516)-765-1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel,(516)-765- 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 7, 2002 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Peconic Landing Request for Bond Reduction Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, enclosed please find a revised bond estimate that indicates the amount of work completed to date. I have also enclosed a copy of the inspection report from the consulting engineers office as prepared by Mr. Gino Aiello, PE. At this time I agree with the findings of the consultant and would recommend the reduction of the current Bond. The New Bond Total has been adjusted to represent the quantity of work remaining and should be in the amount of $132,000.00. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. CC: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) S Gino Aiello, PE (Sidney B. Bowne & Son, LLP) NOrJ~7-20~2 ~9:10 FROM:BOWNE MINEOLA 15167462550 T0:516 765 1366 P.0~2/~02 ~ Experience Empowers ~ Vision Sidney B. 8owne & Son, LLP November 7, 2002 James A. Richter, R.A. Town Engineer, Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Pcconic Landing Request for Bond Reduction by Retirement Living Service8 (RI.S) Dear Mr, Richter: 'hi accordance with your request, i have reviewed the list of construction cost esth'nates attached to a letter dated 10/31/02 to the Town of Southold Planning Department. in which the applicant, R.LS, requests a reduction in the bond to .$126,000_ Of thc thirty-three (33) items,which make up the list, the applicant cia/ms that all have been completed except two (2): Item 24, Sta'eet Tcees and Item 29, Pedestrian Paths. With regard to Item 24, a total of 309 sti,eet trees have been planted on the site. In rny opinion, this is an adequate amount of trees and confomxs with Town standards. The applicant proposes to retain $50,000 in the bond to cover any future replacement costs for those trees that may not survive, A total of $100.000 was allocated for this item in the construction cost estimate. With regard to Item 29, approximately 500 square yards of pedestrian path has been constructed. This represents a small portion o.f paths proposed to be constructed. However, the applic-~mt proposes to retai.n ihe entire allocated Construction cost of $76,000 for this item. Having reviewed the entire fist, I fred that 'all items have been essentially completed with the single exception of the pedestrian paths, and the applicant's request to reduce the bond to $126000 appears to be reasonable. In addition, one of the four rock dams (Itetn #13) was recently damaged by heavy rains and is currently in need of reconstruction. The construction cost estimate for each rock d:tm is $5,000. Accordingly, I recommend that an additional $5,000 be retained, further reducing the bond to $131,000. Sincerely, OA;j~ cc: Denny Wilhehn (RLS) Thomas C. Wolperh P.E, JOSHUA Y.HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax (516)-765- 1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 TEL(516)-765- 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOND ESTIMATE ~ PECONIC LANDING SCTM # 1000-35-01-25 Revised: March 5, 2002 ITEM I. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 20. 21. 22. 23~ 24. 25. 26. 27 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. TOTAL BOND QUANTITY 1,500 L.F. 69.4 ACRE JOB 264,000 C.Y. 103 EACH 20 EACH 47 EACH 9,551 L.F. 2,778 L.F. 407 L.F. 457 L.F. 825 L.F. 4 EACH 3 EACH I EACH 3,156 S.Y 65,000 S.Y. 1,570 LF. 754 S.Y. 6,830 C.Y. 14,500 TONS 3,500 L.F. 1,166 L.F. 500 EACH 85,698 S.Y. 175 EACH 1,340 L.F. 4,200 S.Y. 7,600 S.Y. 80 EACH 2,223 S.Y. JOB JOB DESCRIPTION SAW CUT PAVEMENT (S.R. 25) $ 3.00 CLEARING & GRUBBING 2,500.00 DEMOLITION of STRUCTURES ROUGH GRADING / UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 2.50 CATCH BASINS 2,500.00 BOND (+1-) % QUANTITY VALUE UNIT PRICE AMOUNT COMPLETE REMAINING REMAINING $ 4,500.00 173,500.00 75,000.00 660,000.00 257,500.00 LEACHING POOL (10' Dia. X 7' deep) 2,000.00 40,000.00 CONCRETE MANHOLE (4' Dia.) 2,000.00 94,000.00 18" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 25.00 238,775.00 24" DiA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 30~00 83,340.00 30" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 35.00 14,245.00 36" DIA HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE 40.00 18,280.00 18" DIA CAST IRON DRAINAGE PIPE 30~00 24,750.00 ROCK DAM 5,000.00 20,000.00 ROCK HEADWALL 5,000.00 15,000.00 PRECAST CONCRETE CULVERT 100,000.00 100,000.00 POND LINER (2' Compacted Clay) 15.00 47,340.00 FINE GRADING 1.50 97,500.00 CONCRETE CURBING 10.00 15,700.00 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 30.00 22,620.00 3/4" STONE BLEND or RCA BASE 30~00 204,900.00 ASPHALT PAVEMENT 60.00 870,000.00 EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURE 10.00 35,000.00 MASONRY RETAINING WALL 150.00 174,900.00 STREET TREE 200.00 100,000.00 TOPSOIL & SEED 2.00 171,396.00 STREET LIGHTS 1,500.00 262,500.00 ROAD RESTORATION (Barley & Atlantic) 5.00 6,700.00 MICRO SURFACING (Bailey & Atlantic) 1.20 5,040.00 PEDESTRIAN PATH 10.00 76,000.00 STREET SIGNS 200.00 16,000.00 FIRE LANE I 0.00 22,230.00 TRASH PiCK UP AREA 7,500.00 MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 10,000.00 100% 0 $ 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 75% 1 EACH 5,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 0% 250 EACH 50,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 0% 7,600 S.Y. 76,000.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 100% 0 0.00 90% 10% 1,000.00 ORIGINAL BOND TOTAL: $ 3,964,216.00 REMAINING BOND AMOUNT FOR INCOMPLETE CONSTRUCTION ITEMS $ 132,000.00 YOUNG & YOUNG 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Telephone (631) 727-2303 Facsimile (631) 727-0144 admin~youngengineering.com HOWARD W. YOUNG, Land Surveyor THOMAS C. WOLPERT, Professional Engineer ROBERT C. TAST, Architect October 31, 2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS OVERNIGHT DELIVERY Town of Southold Planning Department 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Lqouthold Town Plan0inct Board Dear Members of the Board: Kindly consider this request, on behalf of the applicant, to reduce the bond to $126,000. Enclosed are the following items: one (1) copy - Construction Cost Estimate dated October 31, 2002 based on Bond Estimate dated August 28, 1998, one (1) copy - Construction Cost Estimate dated October 31, 2002 indicating Value of Work Completed as of October 30, 2002, and one (1) copy - Construction Cost Estimate dated October 31, 2002 indicating Value of Work Remaining as of October 30, 2002. Please note that, based on these estimates the bond may be reduced by an additional $1,495,645.16 ($1,629,205.16 minus $133,560.00) representing the value of work completed since January 25, 2002. Planning Engineering Land Surveying Architecture Page 2 October 31, 2002 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us. TCW/dc Encl. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert CC' Mr. Gino Aiello, P.E. Via Fax & Regular Mail Mr. Jamie Richter, R.A. Regular Mail GROUP VJhere ~ ~ Expericncu Empowers -,~1~ Vision Sidney B. Rowne & Son, LLP November 7, 2002 James A. Richter, R.A. Town Engineer, Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Pcconic Landing Request for Bond Reduction by Retirement Living Services (RLS) Dear Mr. Richter: :h~ accordance with your request, I have reviewed the list of construction cost estimates attached to a letter dated 10/31/02 to the Town of Southold P. annilqg Department.. n which the applicant. R.LS, requests a reduction in the bond to $126,000_ Of thc thirty-three (33) items,which make up the list, the applicant claims that all have been completed except two (2): Item 24. Street Trees and Item 29, Pedestrian Paths. With regard to Item 24, a total of 309 m,eet trees have been planted ou the site, In my opinion, this is an adequate amount of trees mid conforms with Town standards. The applicant proposes to retain $50,000 in the bond to cover any future replacement costs for those trees that may not survive. A total of $100,000 was allocated for this item in the construction cost estimate, With regard to Item 29, approximately 500 square yards of pedestrian path has been constructed. This represents a small portion of paths proposed to be constructed. However, the applicant proposes to retzd.n ibc entire allocated Construction cost of $76,000 for this item. Having reviewed the entire list, I find that 'all items have been essentially completed with the single exception of the pedestrian paths, and the applicant's request to reduce the bond to $126000 appears to be reasonable. In addition, one of the four rock dams (Item #13) wrkq recently damaged by heavy rains and is currently in need of reconstruction. The construction cost estimate for each rock d:tm is $5 000. Accordingly, I recommend that an additional $5,000 be retained, further reducing the bond to $131,000. Sincerely, "'Gino Aie]lo, P.E~ OA;js cc: Denny Wilhelm (RLS) Thomas C- Wolpert, P.E. October 31, 2002 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Prepared for PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, Town of Southold, New York based on Bond Estimate dated August 28, 1998 Prepared by Town of Southold Office of the Engineer Item Description Otv. & Unit Unit Cost No. I Saw Cut Asphalt Pavement (S.R. 25) 1,500 L.F. $3.00 2 Clearing & Grubbing 69.4 Acres $2,500.00 3 Demolition/Removal of Existing Structures JOB $ 75,000.00 4 Rough Grading/Unclassified Excavation 264,000 C.Y. $2.50 5 Catch Basin 103 Each $2,500.00 6 Leaching Pool (10' Dia. X 7' deep) 20 Each $2,000.00 7 Concrete Manhole (4' Dia.) 47 Each $2,000.00 8 18" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 9,551 L.F. $25.00 9 24" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 2,778 L.F. $30.00 10 30" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 407 L.F. $35.00 11 36" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 457 L.F. $40.00 12 18" Dia. Cast Iron Drainage Pipe 825 L.F. $30.00 13 Rock Dam 4 Each $5,000.00 14 Rock Head Wall 3 Each $5,000.00 15 Precast Concrete Culvert 1 Each $ I00,000.00 16 Pond Liner (2' Compacted Clay) 3,156 S.Y. $15.00 17 Fine Grading 65,000 S.Y. $1.50 18 Concrete Curbing 1,570 L.F. $10.00 19 Concrete Sidewalk 754 S.Y. $30.00 20 3/4" Stone Blend or "RCA" 6,830 C.Y. $30.00 21 Asphalt Pavement 14,500 Tons $60.00 22 Erosion Control Structure 3,500 L.F. $10.00 23 Masonry Retaining Wall .~ 1,166 L.F. $150.00 24 Street Tree 500 Each $200.00 25 Topsoil & Seed 85,698 S.Y. $2.00 26 Street Light 175 Each $1,500.00 27 Road Restoration (Bailey & Atlantic Avenue) 1,340 L.F. $ 5.00 28 Micro Surfacing (Bailey & Atlantic Avenue) 4,200 S.Y. $1.20 29 Pedestrian Path 7,600 S.Y. $10.00 30 Street Sign 80 Each $200.00 31 Fire Lane 2,223 S.Y. $10.00 32 Trash Pick Up Area JOB 33 Maintenance & Protection of Traffic JOB Total Cost $4,500.00 $173,500.00 $75,000.00 $660,000.00 $257,500.00 $40,000.00 $94,0OO.O0 $238,775.00 $83,340.00 $14,245.00 $18,280.00 $24,750.0O $2O,O00.OO $15,000.00 $100,O00.00 $47,340.00 $97,500.00 $15,700.00 $22,620.00 $204,900.00 $870,000.00 $35,000.00 $174,900.00 $100,000.00 $171,396.00 $262,500.00 $6,700,00 $5,040.00 $76,000.00 $16,000.00 $22,230.00 $7,500.00 $10,000.00 Sub-Total = + 6 % Administration Fee = $3,964,216.00 $237,852.96 TOTAL = $4,202,068.96 October 31, 2002 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Prepared for PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, Town of Southold, New York indicating Value of Work Completed as of October 30, 2002 Item De$¢riotion Otv. & Unit Unit Cost NO- Total Cost I Saw Cut Asphalt Pavement 2 Clearing & Grubbing 3 Demolition/Removal of Existing Structures 4 Rough Grading/Unclassified Excavation 5 Catch Basin 6 Leaching Pool (10' Dia. X 7' deep) 7 Concrete Manhole (4' Dia.) 8 18" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 9 24" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 10 30" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 11 36" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 12 18" Dia. Cast Iron Drainage Pipe 13 Rock Dam 14 Rock Head Wall 15 Precast Concrete Culvert 16 Pond Liner (2' Compacted Clay) 17 Fine Grading 18 Concrete Curbing 19 Concrete Sidewalk 20 3/4" Stone Blend or "RCA" 21 Asphalt Pavement 22 Erosion Control Structure 23 Masonry Retaining Wall 24 Street Tree 25 Topsoil & Seed 26 Street Light 27 Road Restoration (Bailey & Atlantic Avenue) 28 Micro Surfacing (Bailey & Atlantic Avenue) 29 Pedestrian Path 30 Street Sign 31 Fire Lane 32 Trash Pick Up Area 33 Maintenance & Protection of Traffic 1,500 L.F. $3.00 $4,500.00 69.4 Acres $2,500.00 $173,500.00 100% Comp! $75,000.00 264,000 C.Y. $2.50 103 Each $2,500.00 20 Each $2,000.00 47 Each $2,000.00 9,551L.F. $25.00 2,778 L.F. $30.00 407 L.F. $35.00 457 L.F. $40.00 825 L.F. $30.00 4Each $5,000.00 3 Each $5,000.00 1 Each $100,000.00 3,156 S.Y. $15.00 65,000 S.Y. $1.50 1,570 L.F. $10.00 754 S.Y. $30.00 6,830 C.Y. $30.00 14,500 Tons $60.00 3,500 L.F. $10.00 1,166 L.F. $150.O0 250 Each $200.00 85,698 S.Y. $2.00 175 Each $1,500.00 1,340 L.F. $5.00 $75,000.00 $660,000.00 $257 500.00 $40 000.00 $94 000.00 $238 775.00 $83 340.00 $14 245.00 $18,280.00 $24,750.00 $2O,O00.00 $15,000.00 SI00,000.00 $47,340.00 $97,500.00 $15,700.00 $22,620.00 $204,900.0O $870,O0O.0O $35,OOO.O0 $174,900.00 SS0,000.00 $171,396.00 $262,500.00 $6,700.00 4,200 S.Y. $1.20 $5,040.00 0 S.Y. $10.00 $0.00 80 Each $200.00 $16,000.00 2,223 S.Y. $10.00 $22,230.00 JOB $7,500.00 JOB $10,000.00 Sub-Total = + 6 % Administration Fee -- $3,838,216.00 $230,292.96 TOTAL = $4,O68,508.96 October 31, 2002 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Prepared for PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, Town of Southold, New York indicating Value of Work Remaining as of October 30, 2002 Item Description No. I Saw Cut Asphalt Pavement 2 Clearing & Grubbing 3 Demolition/Removal of Existing Structures 4 Rough Grading/Unclassified Excavation 5 Catch Basin 6 Leaching Pool (10' Dia. X 7' deep) 7 Concrete Manhole (4' Dia.) 8 18" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 9 24" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 10 30" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 11 36" Dia. H.D.P.E. Drainage Pipe 12 18" Dia. Cast Iron Drainage Pipe 13 Rock Dam 14 Rock Head Wall 15 Precast Concrete Culvert 16 Pond Liner (2' Compacted Clay) 17 Fine Grading 18 Concrete Curbing 19 Concrete Sidewalk 20 3/4" Stone Blend or "RCA" 21 Asphalt Pavement 22 Erosion Control Structure 23 Masonry Retaining Wall 24 Street Tree 25 Topsoil & Seed 26 Street Light 27 Road Restoration (Bailey & Atlantic Avenue) 28 Micro Surfacing (Bailey & Atlantic Avenue) 29 Pedestrian Path 30 Street Sign 31 Fire Lane 32 Trash Pick Up Area 33 Maintenance & Protection of Traffic Otv. & Unit Unit Cost Total COSt 0 L.F. $3.00 $O.00 0 Acres $2,500.OO $0.O0 0% $75,000.00 $0.00 0 C.Y. $2.50 $0.00 O Each $2,500.O0 $O.00 O Each $2,O00.OO $O.OO O Each $2,000.00 $O.00 O L.F. $25.00 $O.O0 O L.F. $30.00 $O.O0 0 LF. $35.00 $0.00 O L.F. $40.00 $O.O0 0 L.F. $30.00 $0.OO 0 Each $5,000.00 $0.00 O Each $5,000.00 $O.00 0 Each $100,000.00 $0.O0 0 S.Y. $15.00 $O.00 0 S.Y. $1.50 $0.00 0 L.F. $10.00 $0.00 0 S.Y. $30.00 $0.00 0 C.Y. $30.00 $0.00 O Tons $60.00 $O.00 0 L.F. $10.00 $O.O0 O L.F. $150.00 $O.OO 250 Each $200.00 $50,000.00 0 S.Y. $2.00 $0.OO O Each $1,5OO.O0 $O.OO O L.F. $5.00 $O.OO 0 $.Y. $1.20 $0.00 7,600 S.Y. $10.00 $76,000.00 0 Each $200.00 $0.00 0 5.Y. $10.00 $0.00 0% $7,500.00 $0.00 0% $10,000.00 $0.00 Sub-Total = + 6 % Administration Fee = $126,000.00 $7,560.00 TOTAL = $133,560.O0 Date January 1 I, 2001 Peconic Landing Main Road, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 MEMORANDUM TO FILE At the request of Charles Cuddy Esq., the Planning Board has approved three changes to the approved Site Plan. 1. Eliminate the basement and drop the floor 3' in the Community building. 2. Replace the two culverts with one larger culvert under the bridge. 3. Relocate the entrance road to the east of the model, approx, where the existing road now enters the property. Jamie Richter, Town Engineer has been informed of these changes. 'LANNING BOARD MEMB~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICItARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Supervisor Jean W. Cochran and Town Board Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairma~5~ Release of bond for "Breakers at Lands End" Route 25, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 December 12, 2000 The Town of Southold received a performance bond No. NR17688 from the North River Insurance Company in 1987 for a condominium project known as "The Breakers at Lands End". This project was never built and Peconic Landing has replaced the condominium project with a retirement community project that was recently approved. The Planning Board is requesting the $100,000 bond for the Breakers be released. A bond in the amount of $3,964,216 has been deposited at the Suffolk County National Bank for the Peconic Landing project. Cc: Charles Cuddy Esq. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIANi J. CREMERS K~NNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 12, 2000 Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. 445 Grlffing Avenue, P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. - Cesspool at model home Route 25, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Cuddy, The Planning Board has received your letter of December 11, 2000, regarding the above project. The Board approves the temporary sewage disposal system and temporary water service line for the home/sales office only. As stated in your letter approval has been received from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for this temporary system. The system and the model home must be removed/relocated upon completion of the project. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Site Plan Reviewer Cc: Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 L~IARLES R. CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRIFFING AVENUE R1VERHEAD, NEW YORK TEL: (631)369-8200 FAX: (631) 369-9080 E-mail: crcuddy@earthhnk.net December 11, 2000 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Robert Kassner Site Plan Coordinator Planning Department Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. - Cesgpool at model home Dear Mr, Kassner: In accordance with our discussion, I am enclosing the approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services which included a permit (Health Dept. Referral No. C10-99-0003) for the enclosed plat plan with the notation, "Approval for construction of a temporary subsurface sewage disposal system and temporary water service line for model home/sales office only." This is also to confirm that the model home is to be temporarily located at its present site and that upon completion of construction, the home will be moved. The cesspool will then be sealed and no longer used. Under the circumstances of this one cesspool as a temporary device being located on 144 acres with Health Department approval, 1 submit that this site should not pose a problem during the course of construction. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy Encs. CRC: cg GREGORY F. YAKABOSKI TOWN ATTORNEY MARY C. WILSON ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY w. Supervisor P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1889 F~ (631) 765-1823 ~-mail: townattorne~southold.or g OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To'. From: Date: Re: Planning Board Jamie Richter Ed Forrester Gregory F. Yakaboski, Esq. Town Attorney December 6, 2000 Peconic Landing DEC 06 2000 $outhold Town Planning Board Attached for your information, please find a copy of Town Board resolution adopted November 14, 2000, in regard to Peconic Landing and a Performance Guarantee Agreement. /md attachment ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON NOVEMBER 14, 2000: WHEREAS, Peconic Landing is required to provide a letter of credit, cash, or other security satisfactoW to the Town to serve as a performance guarantee for the total cost of furnishing, installing, connecting and completing all of the street grading, paving, storm drainage and utilities for the project known as "Peconic Landing, be it RESOLVED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold that the Supervisor, Jean W. Cochran is hereby authorized to execute a Performance Guarantee Agreement whereby Peconic Landing will deposit "Performance Bond" money at Suffolk County National Bank in the sum of $3,964,216.00 subject to the approval of the Town Attorney. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk Rivcrhead, NY 11901 CHARLES R. CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRIFFING AVENUE R1VERHEAD, NEW YORK TEL: (631)369-8200 FAX: (631) 369-9080 E-malh crcuddy@ earthlink.net December 5, 200c~ Mr. Robert Kassner Site Plan Coordinator Planning Department Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing Planning Dear Mr. Kassner: Your file should include a bond for the Breakers. Apparently this bond is to insure bluff stabilization. I have been authorized to obtain that bond and return it to Mr. Wolowitz. This will permit a credit to be issued to Peconic Landing. Please advise what steps must be taken to obtain this bond. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy CRC:ms Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 CTIARLES R. CI II)DY ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRIi:FING AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK TEL: (631)369-8:200 FAX: (631) 369-~ E-mail: crcuddy@earthlink.net November 24, 2000 DEC 0,1 2000 Jean Cochran, Supervisor Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Sou~hold Town P~anning Board Re: Performance Guarantee Agreement - Peoonic Landing Dear Mrs. Cochran: Enclosed is one (1) fully executed copy of the Performance Guarantee Agreement. We anticipate deposit of the funds in Suffolk County National Bank this week. CRC:ms Encs. cc: Very truly yours, Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney Bennett 0rlowski, Chairman, Plannin~ Board ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON NOVEMBER 14, 2000: WHEREAS, Peconic Landing is required to provide a letter of credit, cash, or other security satisfactory to the Town to serve as a performance guarantee for the total cost of furnishing, installing, connecting and completing all of the street grading, paving, storm drainage and utilities for the project known as "Peconic Landing, be it RESOLVED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold that the Supervisor, Jean W. Cochran is hereby authorized to execute a Performance Guarantee Agreement whereby Peconic Landing will deposit "Performance Bond" money at Suffolk County National Bank in the sum of $3,964,216.00 subject to the approval of the Town Attorney. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk p~o~ corporafi~ wi~ aplm~ofb~-~_ in ,~m/im~ New York ("Pecmic Lmding~ gieTovat of Southold. New York (the"Towu'~ md SutS~k County Ne~x~d Beak, · New York V~l:u~a~.~, P~mnic Lmding is undemldng to coustruct a retircmmt comnumi~ at its propen'y on Rou-~ 2.q in dm Town Ohe"Pmjec~ ~I between the Suffolk Co~, _n~_ I~dv___mial Developmeat ASency and United St-t_~ Trust Company of N~w York. as Tmstcc (tl~ "Tru~ n~ by · ~ from the"Lemiers" id,~+h~t_ ia tim Building BNP Pan'bas, ac~i~ ~ ~s N~w Y~k ~c~ as A~::~ AS~t, ~mi P~mio NOW, Wl~F,~OP~ for valuable co~sidermion, lhe receipt and suffide~-y whereof is hereby acknowledged, lhe parties beret~ sipee ss tllow~ 1. ,~.~ ~___ = .~~ ~. Pe~c Landin~ ~h=ll deposit ~he sum of three mlillon, nine por~ thereof, si~ned by the Town Supes~or, with copies to Pecmic Landing a~ Southold, Inc. ~ Fe~lher l~tll, P.O. Box 430, Souflmld, NY 11971, and Charles 1~ Cuddy, F~q., P.O. ~ 1~47, withom l]~ p~ic~ mittm ~mam~ of tim Tow~ TI~ Bmk stroll not r~ t[~ Per~ormauc~ ~uarauum Peconic Len~ may request release ~a potion ~the es~owed funds when a portion ofthe subjec~ i~,-~ m ~,,,~-~! I~ w~l~l ~m~l~:t ~ 1~'o~ ~ Pecoaic Lmd~ qr~e to indeamify 5. ~ The Bank may resign at any time by ~iving wriffen notice giereof to Pecqmi~ Landing afld th~ Town. Upon such notice, n successor Bm~k gudl be appointed by lhe par~s. If die panics .r~m,;nin$ are unable to 8tp~o upon 8 successor Bank wilhin leo (10) days offer such nolice, the Bank so ~ shall designate a suc¢,-~_~or Bank which may include any-bank or trust company with a pla~c ofbu.qin~ss in Suffolk County, New York The resi~onin~ Bank shall 6. ~ The Town and th~ Bank acknowledge that .thi~. Performance Cmarantee Agrccment 'mil b~ resigned and postM as colhacral by Pecomc Landing to or on the order of~l~ Trustee and the Leuders in com~ecgon with the rimming ofth~ Projcct. Pursuan~ m such assignment, Pecordc I,,~cling ~ continue to p~rform undc~ this agreement on belmlfofthe and the Bank agree to continuo to perform under and accept tho tmns of~his Agrocmc~t if thc Trustee or the Lencters 8iv~ writtm nolice to them that Pcconic Lmdlng v~ no longer per~orrn hermmder on their behal~ IN WITHES wIm~EOF, lhe parries hereM law execuiM d~is Agr~neuI as of d~ day and year fl~ sbov~writt~ WFI'NH.qS PECONIC LANDIN(~ AT SOUTHOLD, INC. TOWN ol; $OLFI'~OLD Mailing Acltlress: P.O. Box 1547 I~.iverlmad, NY 119(31 (]IARLE$ R. CUI)DY ATTORNEY AT LAW 445GR1FF[NO AVENI rE [4I\/ERItlL,\ D, NIS\V YO I,?. K TEL: (631) 369-82~ FAX: (631) 369-9¢~ E-mad: crcuddy(~eavt blink.net November 24, 2000 Jean Cochran, Supervisor Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Performance Guarantee Agreement - Pe¢onic Landing Dear Mrs. cochran: Enclosed is one (1) fully executed copy of the Performance Guarantee Agreement. We anticipate deposit of the funds in Suffolk County National Bank this week. Very truly yours, CRC:ms Encs. ~ cc: Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney Bennett Orlowski, Chairman, Planning Board ~ 2000 SouthoId Town Planning Board ADD ON RESOLUTION FOR PECONIC LANDING PROJECT- A COPY OF THE AGREEMENT IS ATTACHED. WHEREAS, Peconic Landing is required to provide'a letter of credit, cash, or other security satisfactory to the Town to serve as a performance guarantee for the total cost of furnishing, installing, connecting and completing all of the street grading, paving, storm drainage and utilities for the project known as "Peconic Landing, be it RESOLVED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold that the Supervisor, Jean W. Cochran is hereby authorized to execute a Performance Guarantee Agreement whereby Peconic Landing will deposit "Performance Bond" money at Suffolk County National Bank in the sum of $3,964,216.00 subject to the approval of the Town Attorney. 13/08/2080 18:35 631369908B CHARLES R CUDDY PAGE ~2104 Sots%Id, New York (dm ~Town') by md among Peconiz ~ ~ Southold, Inc.. a New York non- p~o~ corporeti0o, with & pla~ ofbusi,,t,~_ _ in ~ New Ym'k ('?ecmic Lmdinb¢~ the Tovat of Southoid. New York (the'roan") md Suffolk Coumy Nstiomd Bmk. a New York bmldn~ properly on Roule 25 in abe Town (t~ "Proj~; md ~, thc Proj~'t will Im flnvled in part from proceeds of cemin bonds i~ued ,rider the Indenture of Trust, daied as of Novnnber 1, 2000 (the 'Bond Indentu~), by and between th~ S,_,~lk County lndumid Development Aseacy and Uni~d States Trust Company of New York, a~ Ttu~t~ (the "Trustee~) and by a loaa fnan the "Lenders" identtf~d in the Bu~ldinS BNP Pan'ba~, acting through ira New York Brm~ch, as Adm~strafiv~ A~nt, and Peaonio NOW, TI.-n:m.l~OR.~ for vslmble coasidex~on. ~he r_~_~pt stat suffidmcy whermfis hereby aclmowledged, the parges herelo agree as igloos: 2. Ptmnmt of Per~onnance C-uarent~. If at any fin~ er limes during the term of ~i~ Agreement, the Town provides ~e Bank wilh a ~ request for t~e p~ Guarantee or any Feather ~ P.O. Box 4~0, Soulhold. NY I 1 ~71, and Charles B. Cuddy, Esq., P.O. Box 1547, Riva-head, NY 11~01, stating ~ P_~_ ~_~ I.andln~a h~ f~il o~d t~ co~stnlct ~ or ali ofu'~ ~nm. rovmmmi~ as required by th~ final sit~ plan for the Pmje~ ~d tqxm expiration ora SO day'period without the prior vaitum ~,~mat oft/m Town. 11~ Bank shall not re, D, as~lhe Peffornmnce Gtutrantc~ Peck_ ia Landing may request release ora portion of the escrowed funds whm a potedoa of the subject 15188/2888 le:35 6313699888 and in .~'cordance with P~conic Lmdin~'s eS~m~s wi~h ~he Tnmee and the Lmdem. 3. Term. U-L-ss t~mimU~d e~di~ by wri~n agrt~ of d~ Tow~ ~tfis A~-emm~t shell mm~e~e three 0) ~-s ~n ~he a~ of its csecu~n, e* which time the Bmk shell p~ ~ dirm~i,',n 1~ Trmt~ for dep~it in ~1~ 'q:~ojm Fund". ibc Bank and hold it harmless from and agaimt any end all liabilities incun~d by it ~. f ~lmta~t!m~f.~ The Benk may resign a~ a~, time by siring writ~ notice thereof to P~oni6 Landing and lhe Town. Upoa such nolicz, a successor Bmk shall 1~ appoin~ by ~e par6~, lfthc pardes remaining am uasbl~ to sgr~ upoa a sucv~ssar B~k v~iihin tm (10) da~s sirra' such nodce, the Bank so ~si~n8 shall d~nat~ & succ_~_~o~ Benk which may include any bank or trust company with a place of business in Suffolk Courtly, New York. The res~i~g Bank shall cm~inuo to serve until its successor acc~t~ the appo~nUnent and receives tim P~ Guarantee. Peg:on/c Landing and the To~n shall have thc g~ht at m~ tin~ upon their tmanimous consent to substitute a new B~nk or Agmts by giving writ~m notice thereof to tim Bank fl~en a~ing. 6. As~i_~,~m~nt. Th~ Town and the Bank acknowledge that this Performance 6uarantee Asrccment will be assigned and postcd as colla~ral by Peconic Landing to or on the order of~h~ Trustee and tl~c Lenders in connec'tion with the finmcing of thc Pro]cot. Pursuant to tach assignnumL Peconic Landing shall coatinu~ to pc~onn undc~ this a~rccme~t on behalf of the Tmst~ m~d fl~ I.,~n~ unlc~ c,~rtaia ~omiitio~ ofth~ fman~ m'~ not ~ati~ied. Th~ Town and th~ Be~d~ ~ to confim,te to perform ,md~- sad aac~ the lin'ms of this .A&te~mcat ffthc Trustee or the Lenders 8~ve ~tt~n notice to them that P~onic Landing will no longer perform hereunder on thch' b~. IN ~S WHI!ItEOF, 1be pmies im'e~o have executed this Agreement as of 1he da~ and year first sbove-writmt WITNESS PECONIC LANDING AT $OUTHOLD, INC. TOV/I~ OF $OIJ'I~OLD M~iling Address: 1~O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 CHARLES R. CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRIFFING AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK TEL: (631)369-8200 FAX: (631) 369-9080 1~ - mail: crcuddyCc0earthhnk.net November 20, 2000 Mr. Robert Kassner Site Plan Coordinator Planning Department Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. 27 2000 Dear Mr. Kassner: Enclosed please find the Freshwater Wetlands Permit for Peconic Landing. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy Encs. CRC:cg New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631) ~.~.~.-0365 · FAX: (631) 444-0360 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us John P. Cahi[I Commissioner November 16, 2000 U.S. Retirement Communities on behalf of Pcconic Landing The Georgetown Building 101 Chesley Drive Media, PA 19063-1761 RE: 1-4738-01805/00001 Dear Permittee: In conformance with the requirements of the State Uniform Procedures Act (Article 70, ECL) and its implementing regulations (6NYCRR, Part 621) we are enclosing your permit. Please read all conditions carefully. If you are unable to comply with any conditions, please contact us at the above address. Also enclosed is a permit sign which is to be conspicuously posted at the project site and protected from the weather. Very truly yours, Carol A. Farkas Environmental Analyst CAF/Is Enclosure ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road t~ P.O. Box 1179 ~ ~)~ Southold, New York 11971 ~'~-~' Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON NOVEMBER 14, 2000: WHEREAS, Peconic Landing is required to provide a letter of credit, cash, or other security satisfactory to the Town to serve as a performance guarantee for the total cost of furnishing, installing, connecting and completing all of the street grading, paving, storm drainage and ntilitics for the project known as "Pcconic Landing, be it RESOLVED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold that the Supervisor, Jean W. Cochran is hereby authorized to execute a Performance Guarantee Agreement whereby Peconic Landing will deposit "Performance Bond" money at Suffolk County National Bank in the sum of $3,964,216.00 subject to the approval of the Town Attorney. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk 2000 Mailin~ Ac]dress: P.©. Box 1547 I(iverheac], NY 11901 C~t ARLES R. C[ DDY ATTORNE'i NI' LAW 445 GI~iFFI NG ,\VI~N[ 515 RiVEP. IIEAD, NEW YORK 'FEI,: (63i) FAX: (631) 3(:0-9080 E-mail: crcuddy(Weart hlin k.m,t November 29, 2000 Bennett Orlowski Southold Town Planning Board Chairman Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Dear Mr. Orlowski: Enclosed herewith is the check of Peconic Landing representing the administrative fee for the Peconic Landing site plan approval in the sum of $237,853. The check has been made payable to the Town of Southold. Within the next day I will forward to you Suffolk County National Bank's receipt evidencing the deposit of $3,964,216. Please confirm that with payment of the enclosed sum and evidence of the deposit, the monies ensure performance of the improvements at the site that the Planning Board site plan requirements have now been satisfied in full and that the site plan will now be signed. Thank you for your continuing assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy Eric. CRC:cg 8 0 2000 Maiho~ddress: ~0, Bo× 154,7 P~iw~head, NY 11901 C~l ARLES R. Cl. ~DDY [FEI.: (631) ~09-82(X3 FAX: (631) 369-9(B0 E-mail: c,~cuddy(a;earthlink.n,.t November 29, 2000 Bennett Oflowski Southold Town Planning Board Chairman Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. NOV ~ 0 2000 Sou~old Town PlaflfliflO BOIlfl:l Dear Mr. Orlowski: For your records, we are enclosing a letter of receipt from the Suffolk County National Bank showing the deposit of $3,964,216 at the bank pursuant to the terms of the Performance Guarantee Agreement. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy Enc. cc: Jean W. Cochran, Town Supervisor Gregory Yakaboski, Town Attorney CRC:cg 1~/2ff/2000 WED 02:18 FAX THE SUFFOLK COUNTY NATIONAL BANK THE FINANCIAL PLANNING CENTER Dan A, Cie. ale Senior Vl~ Prcsldeat & Tr~st Ol~r 002 November 29, 2000 Charles IL Cuddy, Esq. 445 Gfi_'ffing Avenue Riverhead, 'NY 11901 V/a Fax and Regular Mail Re: Peconie Landing - Southold Escrow Custodial Account Dear Mr. Cuddy: This L-.tder is in receipt of $3,964,216.00 for the '~ve refea-enc~TA account on November 28, 2000. Very Lm!y yours, Dan A. Cicale PLANNING BOARD MEMBE ~I~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Ehairman WILLIhM J. CREMERS KENNETH L, EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGiANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P~O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-3136 Telephone (631) 765-1935 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Gregory Yakaboski, Town Attorney Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer~d',, Declaration of Covenants & Restrictions for Peconic Landing at Southold SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 October 23, 2000 On September 15, 2000, I had sent the attached C & R's for review. To date, I have not received a reply. The C & R's have been amended since the first submission to include the green house, barn and garage, as recommended by the NYS Office &Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. Please review these amended C & R's for legal sufficiency. Cc: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner OCT 1 3 2000 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS Southold Town Planning Boar~ This Declaration made and dated the ~ ~ day of&a~g~t, 2000, by PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC., with an office at Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, hereinafter referred to as the "Declarant". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. is the owner in fee simple of certain lands located on the northerly side of New York State Route 25, Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 035.00, Block 01.00, Lot 025.000, and more particularly described on the annexed Schedule A; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of said approval, the owner has deemed it necessary, for the best interests of the Town of Southoid, the owner, and the interests of the surrounding community, that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said parcel, and that the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office. NOW, THF~REFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarant for the purpose of carrying out the intents above-expressed does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereinafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon aH purchasers and holders of said premises, its successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That the Declarant will preserve and maintain the external design of the structures known as Brecknock Hall, the existing barn, adjacent garage and greenhouse which are located on the property described in Schedule A. Page 1 of 5 2. That Declarant's efforts to preserve and maintain the character of the present structures will not preclude exterior or interior renovation to provide for the safe and efficient use of the structures. 3. That any substantial proposed change in the exterior design of the structures shall be subject to approval by the Southold Town Architectural Review Board. 4. That the use of Brecknock Hall, the existing barn, adjacent garage and greenhouse shall be determined only by the Declarant, its successors and assigns. 5. That the within Declaration can be modified only at the request of the owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing, but their consent to such modification shall not be required. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant above-named has executed the foregoing Declaration the day and year first above-written. PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. By: L 'i [ , d~ ff - ~-~jM ~ William G. Tlfompson, Prtsidant STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK On the ~ ~ - day of Aagtm;, in the year 2000, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared WILLIAM G. THOMPSON, personally known to me, or proved to .m.e on the basis o,f satisfactory evidence, to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument ana acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument. Public JOAN M. LUCA Page 2 of 5 NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New Yonk ~ommleNon Expires Jan 31, 20 ~_...~ SCHEDULE A All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Crreenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGI3~NING at a granite monument found on the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) at the southwesterly comer of land now or formerly of John Abadiotakis and Christian Abadiotakis, formerly of H. Dwight Ripley, being the southeasterly comer of the premises herein described: RUNNING THENCE from said point of beginning South 66 degrees 01 minutes 20 seconds West along the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25.), 634.76 feet to a monument found and land now or formerly of Jerry H. Schofield and Frank Justin Mclntosh; THENCE along land now or formerly of Jerry H. Schofield and Frank Justin McIntosh the following four (4) courses and distances: 1) North 11 degrees 31 minutes 10 seconds West, 210.00 feet; 2) North 19 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West, 344.00 feet; South 65 degrees 47 minutes 10 seconds West, 213.37 feet; South 19 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds East, 550.15 feet to the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25); THENCE along the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) the following two (2) courses and distances: South 65 degrees 23 minutes 50 seconds West, 285.49 feet; South 66 degrees 36 minutes 40 seconds West, 589.52 feet to land now or formerly of JEM Realty Co.; THENCE along land now or formerly of JEM Realty Co. the following four (4) courses and distances: 1) North 41 degrees 39 minutes 10 seconds West, 1084.54 feet; 2) North 65 degrees 07 minutes 50 seconds East, 376.40 feet; 3) North 32 degrees 29 minutes 10 seconds West, 982.87 feet; 4) North 32 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West, 426.81 feet to the approximate high water mark of Long Island Sound; THENCE along the approximate high water mark of Long Island Sound the following fourteen (14) tie-line courses and distances: 1) North 55 degrees North 40 degrees North 48 degrees 4) North 53 degrees 5) North 33 degrees 6) North 25 degrees 87/ North 49 degrees North 64 degrees 9) North 55 degrees 13 minutes 20 seconds East, 41.44 feet; 13 minutes 18 seconds East, 162.82 feet; 59 minutes 18 seconds East, 156.47 feet; 12 minutes 47 seconds East, 85.49 feet; 06 minutes 38 seconds East, 156.54 feet; 04 minutes 36 seconds East, 352.41 feet; 30 minutes 59 seconds East, 81.53 feet; 30 minutes 21 seconds East, 163.50 feet; 49 minutes 13 seconds East, 172.29 feet; Page 4 of 5 10) North 65 degrees 46 minutes 13 seconds East, 154.46 feet; 11) North 45 degrees 07 minutes 11 seconds East, 135.34 feet; 12) North 55 degrees 35 minutes 02 seconds East, 214.28 feet; 13) North 45 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East, 362.94 feet; 14) North 27 degrees 45 minutes 52 seconds East, 504.31 feet to land now or formerly of Floyd F. King., Jr.; THENCE along land now or formerly of Floyd F. King, Jr. the following fourteen (14) courses and distances: I) South 30 degrees 10 2) South 31 degrees 03 3) South 28 degrees 19 4) South 13 degrees 46 5) South 27 degrees 56 6) South 00 degrees 19 7) South 01 degrees 34 8) South 03 degrees 40 9) South 00 degrees 04 10) South 05 degrees 18 11) South 00 degrees 39 12) South 01 degrees 45 13) South 07 degrees 02 14) South 76 degrees 49 minutes 40 seconds East, 926.10 feet; minutes 40 seconds East, 300.01 feet; minutes 30 seconds East, 89.61 feet; minutes 30 seconds East, 33.68 feet; minutes 50 seconds West, 65.47 feet; minutes 40 seconds East, 179.94 feet; minutes 00 seconds East, 300.20 feet; minutes 00 seconds East, I00.00 feet; minutes 20 seconds West, 172.71 feet; minutes 40 seconds East, 100.93 feet; minutes 30 seconds East, 100.15 feet', minutes 00 seconds East, 434.17 feet; minutes 00 seconds East, 40.19 feet; minutes 10 seconds West, 155.11 feet; THENCE still along land now or formerly of Floyd F. King, Jr. and along land now or formerly of John Abadiotakis and Christian Abadiotakis, South 24 degrees 34 minutes 30 seconds East, 805.00 feet to the northerly side of Main Road (NYS route 25), the point or place of BEGINN]2qG. Page 5 of 5 Tob. l, ho~ (691 ) 72'7-290~ I-IOWA~D W. YOUI~G, I~ml TUOUA~ e. WOL~RT, ]~on.I OctoberS, 2000 ATTN: Mr. Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Planning Department 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) OCT ! 0 2000 Southold Town Planning Board Dear Mr. Kassner: Enclosed are two (2) additional sets of the Site Plan & Details (Sheets 1-13) last dated September 6, 2000. These plans are forwarded for your use, pursuant to your recent request. If you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert TCW/dc Encl. CC: Mr. Denny Wilhelm Mr. Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. PLANNING BOARD MEMB~Q BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, RICHARD CAGG1ANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-3136 Telephone (631) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 2, 2000 Charles Cuddy, Esq. P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Proposed site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Dear Mr. Cuddy, Enclosed is a signed copy of our agreement. As discussed, I need an updated copy of the declaration of covenants and restrictions mentioning the garage and greenhouse. ~R6b0tt (3. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer COVER PAGE TO: FROM: CHARLES R CUDDY TEL: 63~3698200 COMMENT: CHARleS R. CUDDY Atto .r~.~y at Law · 445 Grif~g Avenue Rivcrhead, New York 11901 Tel ~6:~ ! -369-g200 :Fax #631-369.9050 TO; R~bett Kass.~r Fax #: 765-3136 TELECOPIER COVER ~ET Total t~umber o£ pages including cover sheet: ~ If transmission is faui~y or incomplete, please inform us as soon ~s possible. Operator: Catherine Date: September 2~ 2000 l~iYer'hena, NY ! 1901 Cr :I ARLF. S R. C~O DDY TE L: (63I) FA,'(,; (631) September 25, 2000 Robert Kassner ~lanning Departmant Town of South~ld Main Road Southold~ RY 1~971 Dear Attached is a letter from the D.E.C. ~oget~er w£~ a proposed letter regarding site plan requirements. CRC:c~ ]E~olo~ures Very truly yours, CH~,R!LES R New York 5tare Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Envltonmental Permits, Region One Phone: [631) ~4-~3~5 · F~: (~) 444-0~0 $~ua~b~r 21, 2000 A,ttomey at Law ,~45 Gnffir,,g Argue ~varlleact, New York 11901 N¥S.D~C Application I.D. f, 1-4738-01805100001 Peeontc Lo, ndin$ a~ Soatho~d D~r Nh'. Ctl~dy: [ mn in receipt of revised plans fi-om Thomas C. Wolpert of Yotmg and Young, which cle~ly r~fle~t the recom.me.~d~t~on fi'ora the Office ofl~e.:'ks, R~cr~al~o~t azul Historic Pr~er,,ation to r,rain Breckneck ?la.Il, its associated garage, greemhou~e and wood f~m~e barn. ' A Notice ofCo'mptete App[icat[oa is being prepared for publication in ~e En~mmaeaml Nofi~ Bullet~ m~d official To~ n~spa~r. We ~tlcipate ~ssu~ ~e permit on OctoPi 2 l, 2~, providing no mtbstaudVe commits are r~eiv~ ~om the public. Il'you have any questions regardhlg this ma~ter; please ;outaet mc at 63 L.444-0365. Sincerely, C~rol A. ~'~k~s Environm~atal CAF;cg R. Cowen ~HARLES R G~aflemen: P~o~c ~d~g ~ ~hol~ ~. ~e m~ 145-~ ~te l~t~ on ~e ~ ~de of~ Y~k StsteRo~e.~, id~ by S~o~C~ntyT~No. 1~015.~1.~ ~.~0, to ~ P~mc L~ is in a zo~n~ u~ ~s~ ~ a ~e ~ ~. ~ ~po~ to ~op a ~ ~e ~mpl~ at ~s ~ ~d~ of 250 ~sigenti~ u~ts, ~ ~ ~d c~ f~ for bo~ ~ ~ ~ n~ng ~ ~ b~ ~ by · e Bo~d, the s~a~ ~nml~t% ~d fo~a pubic ~g ~ndifio~ ~ appro~ ~ ~. The PI~ Bo~ ~ d~ ~t ~ of ~ ~&~ ~o~ ~ve b~ ~ ~d $~ P~c ~d~g p~ m~s th~ r~o~ of~ 5oo~old To~ Code. T~s · co ~r ~ ~ ~ P~ Bo~ ~e T~ of 5~o~ ~ ~v~ the ~ gte p~ ~ ~e ~ P~o~v La~g al Sou~ ~., h~ ~ ~d ~mp~ ~ gte V~ truly yo~s, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 MEMORANDUM BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765~ 1802 S£P e e TO: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board FROM: Building Department DATE: September 22, 2000 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN CERTIFICATION Project: Peconic Landin,q Location Rt. 25, Greenport SCTM# 1000 - Section 35 - Block 1 - Lot 2._~5 Date of Last Revision Sept. 6, 2000 1. THE PROPOSED USE Life Care Facility AND ACCESSORY USE AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN IS/ARE PERMITTED IN THIS HD DISTRICT. 2. PROPOSED AND EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 100 OF SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 3. ALL STRUCTURES COMPLY WITH SETBACKS AS CONTAINED IN BULK SCHEDULES OR ELSEWHERE IN CHAPTER 100. Authorized Signature 1~O. Box 1547 l,~iverhead, NY 11901 CHARLES R. CUDDY September 8, 2000 TEL: (631) ~:O-85110 FAX: (631) 3(:o-gtk~l) E-mad: crcuddyO;,eartMink.net Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SEP 12 2000 So::'~h o I0 "Ibwn Plannin§ Board Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed please find a copy of letter directed to Thomas C. Wolpert of Young & Yot~ng by the State of New York Department of Transportation. This letter approves the curb cuts as shown on the latest plan, i.e. the plan of July 21, 2000, of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Will you please make this letter a part of your file and confirm to me that this will satisfy your requirement in connection with indicating approval of the site plan requirements for Peconic Landing. CRC:JML Enclosure VeT truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy Sep 08 O0 10:33a a~lliung & Young SEP-07-2088 13:39W NYSDDT TRAFFIC & SAFETY September 7, 2000 5TATI~ OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUP/~AUGE, INI,Y. ! 171~8 P, 82/83 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpen, P.E. Young and Young 400 Osuander Avenue Riverhead. New York 1 ! 901 Dear Mr. WolpoA: Your Juiv 26.2000 i~¢.submission Peconic Landing at So~uthold O~ ~ Ng. 97-2~P This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review, The proposed driveway Iocalions shown on yom' July 21, 2000 plans a~e approved. Prior to issuing a New York State Higbw,,y Work Permit, thc following items must be addzessed: A fi211 set of construction plans are ne.c~sar7. Tho ret should include all NYSDOT item numbers and de~ails. Only Sheet 10 was resubmitted. 2. Provide separate eisa and pavement marking sheet. 3. Provide Maintenance and Protection of Traffic Plan Sheet. The typical widths mu~t Ix: shown on the plan m denote tho discontinuity in width or'new pavement and shoulder (as well as edSe line and sidewalk offsets). Add the following NYSDOT item numbers to the plans for line satire removal, sun, ey and stakcotU, embanim~cnt in pl~ce, topsoil, turf establJehe'~vt, temp. timbc~ sheet piling, ~'cnch and culvert cxcav, und backfill, sign rclocatiun on new post, new stop sign, new "No Left Turn" sign, raise and rcsct utility MH fr~ne and lid, fire hydrant relocation, water main offset. p.8 Sep 08 OD 10:33a Jng & Younl~ HY5DOI TRAFFIC & SAFETY 50?~?-0144 P. B3x03 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. September 7, 2000 Page 2 Add Std. Drawings for drain baSin excavation/relocation. Add Type 5 handicap ramp at enmmcc crossings. Add cross-section of driveway dtaail including the guUer linc. Show edse of shoulder b'eaUnent on south side of Routc 25. Show non-v~ying cross-sio~ of new pavr detail depicting any point of mmsition on plans. Show invert ctcvatiora and drulnagc table for drainage structures in the plan. Add double-yellow barter lines at driveways. Show all utility poles and address their conflict with new features (if neccss~). D. Ad~ thc usc of asphalt 6p-up on frontage of neighboring pare, cl. Revise MPT plans to dcpict lane shift schcm~ with I I' width maintained at all times. Dcsignatcd NYSDOT Bikeway must have minimum Y shoulder at ali times (except where right mtn lar~s arc present). Alee, the bicycle signage is improperly used/located. Complete outstanding items remaining from ou~ November 5, !999 comment letter. A consultant inspection agreement will be required for this projecL The subject material is being r~viewed by Mr. Dan Herlihy. He can he contscle, d at 952-6020 if you l~ve any questions regarding L~S matter. Please send ail corresFondcncc to his attention. Very mdy yours, Tra~c Engineering & Safety cc: Ms. Valcric Scopaz, Town of Soutbeld Mr. Ralanond Jacobs, Town of Southold AWB.'DH:JS TOTRL P.03 CRAIG SIRACUSA, PE REGIONAL DIRECTOR September 7, 2000 STATE Of NEW YORK DEPARTMENt OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUge, N.Y. 11788 SEP 11 2000 Planning So,~rd Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Young and Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Dear Mr. Wolpert: Your July 26, 2000 Resubmission Peconic Landing at Southold Route 25 Greenport SCTM 1000-35-1-25 Our Case No. 97-263P This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. The proposed driveway locations shown on your July 21, 2000 plans are approved. Prior to issuing a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: A full set of construction plans are necessary. The set should include ail NYSDOT item numbers and details. Only Sheet 10 was resubmitted. 2. Provide separate sign and pavement marking sheet. 3. Provide Maintenance and Protection of Traffic Plan Sheet. 4. Plan Sheet 10: The typical widths must be shown on the plan to denote the discontinuity in width of new pavement and shoulder (as well as edge line and sidewalk offsets). Add the following NYSDOT item numbers to the plans for line stripe removal, survey and stakeout, embankment in place, topsoil, turf establishment, temp. timber sheet piling, trench and culvert excav, and backfill, sign relocation on new post, new stop sign, new "No Left Turn" sign, raise and reset utility MH frame and lid, fire hydrant relocation, water main offset. C. The following details need to be added or revised: Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. September 7, 2000 Page 2 2. 3. 4. 5. Add Std. Drawings for drain basin excavation/relocation. Add Type 5 handicap ramp at entrance crossings. Add cross-section of driveway detail including the gutter line. Show edge of shoulder treatment on south side of Route 25. Show non-varying cross-slope of new pavt. detail depicting any point of transition on plans. Show invert elevations and drainage table for drainage structures in the plan. Add double-yellow barrier lines at driveways. Show all utility poles and address their conflict with new features (if necessary). D. Add the use of asphalt tip-up on frontage of neighboring parcel. Revise MPT plans to depict lane shift scheme with 11' width maintained at all times. Designated NYSDOT Bikeway must have minimum 5' shoulder at all times (except where right turn lanes are present). Also, the bicycle signage is improperly used/located. 5. Complete outstanding items remaining from our November 5, 1999 comment letter. A consultant inspection agreement will be required for this project. The subject material is being reviewed by Mr. Dan Herlihy. He can be contacted at 952-6020 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Very truly yours, Original Signed By Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering & Safety cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southol~ Mr. Raymond Jacobs, Town of Southold AWB:DH:JS PECONIC LANDING August 2, 2000 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 SEP S ? 2N6 Southold Town Plannino Board Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Gentlemen: This is to acknowledge the understanding of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. that no building permit will be issued and, in fact, the site plan will not be signed by the Chairman of the Planning Board unless and until the performance bond or a letter of credit in a satisfactory form is presented to the Town, together with payment of the engineering review fee. It is our understanding that upon presentation of the above documents and payment of the fee that a signed site plan will be delivered to us and that building permits for the work will be issued in accordance with the requirements of the Building Department. Very truly yours, PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. Ag~ and consent~.~ to: _ Bennett Orl~wsk~lY3r., Chairman / ' Southold Town Planning Board Feather Hi]] Box 480 * Southold, New York ] 1971-0430 (516) 765-9150 Toll Free ] 888-273 26(;4 , Fax: (516) 765-9149 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS This Declaration made and dated the __.~q'"d_ day c)f~2 ~x~, by PECONIC LANDiNG AT SOUTHOI.D, 1NC, with an office at Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, hereinafter referred to as the "Declarant". WITNESSETH; WIlE/LEA S, PECONIC LANDING A T SOUTHOI. D, 1NC is the owner in fee simple of certain lands located on the northerly side of New York State Route 25, Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated oo the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 035.00, Block 0100, l,ol 025.000, and more partlctdarly described on tile annexed Schednle A; and WltEREAS, for and in consideration of the grantin8 of said approval, the owner has deemed it necessary, for the best interests of the Town of Southold, thc owner, and thc imcrests of the surrounding community, that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said parcel, and that the within Declaration be recorded in the Snffolk County Clerk's Office. NOW, THERIgFOR[, THIS DECLARATION WITNE$SETII: That the Declarant fi)r the purpose of carryin8 out thc intents above-expressed docs hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein de.qcrihed shall he[einafter be subject to the followin8 covenants which shall mn with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers and holders of said premises, its successors and assigns, to wit, 1. That the Declarant will preserve and maintain the external design of the structures known as Brecknock Hall and the existing barn, which are located nn the properly described in Page I of 5 $£p ? 20LJLI Southold Town Plarmir g Board Schedule A. 2 That Declalant's efforls to preserve and ma;ntaln tile character o£ the plescnt structures will not preclude exterior or interior rcn0vation to p~uvidc rot Ihe sara a=~ e~ci~t use of the st~cturcs, 3. That nny substantial propos~ ch~&c in thc exterior d~isn of the ~mcture$ sllall bc su~icct to approval by the Solithold Town ~chilectural Review Board. 4. That the us~ off Br~kn~k Hall and the ~isting barn shall be detemiincd only by the Declaranl, its successors and assigns. 5. That the within Declaration can be modified only al Iht request o~ thc owner o~lhe premises with the approval o~a majorit~ plu~ one offthe Plannin8 Bored o~ the Town of Southold after a public headn8. Ad~oininff property owners shall be entitled to ,uticc o~s~luh public ~aring, but thdr consent to such modificminn ~all not be required. IN WI~ESS WttER~OF. Ihe D~claranl above-named has exeouted the foresoin8 Declaration the day and year first above-written. PECONIC I,ANDINO AT SOUTHOLD, INC. . ~lt., ' j eft.._ William G. Tho~flps0n. President STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) On the ~ day of.a.gl~~. in the year 2000, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared WILLIAM G. TflOMPSON, peraonally known to me, or proved to me on the basis of satiffactory evidence, to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within Instrument ~,nd Page 2 of 5 acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity and that by his signature on the instrumet~t, the individual, or the person upon behal£ o£ which tho individual acted, ~x~uted it~strumcnt. CHARLES R. CUDDY MOlaty Public, State of New YO~ No. 5872225 Ol~llfled In Suffolk County Expires December 3-1, Page 3 of 5 SCIIEDULE A All that certes plot, piece or perccl ofland situate, ]ymg and being n! Oreenport, Tow of Southold, Coonty of Suffolk ahd State-of New York, bounded and described as f'o owe: BEGINNING at a granite monument found on the northerly side of Main Road ..075 Rout,e 25) at the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of.lohn Abadiotakis and Christen Abedmtakis, formerly of ri. Dwight Ripley, being the southeasterly corner of the premises herein described: RUNNING TItE. NCE from saidpoint ofbeginning South 66 degrees 01 minutes 20 seconds West along thc northerly side of Main l~.oad (N¥S Route 25), 634.76 lreet to a monument found and land now or formerly ot'JerPy H. $chofic[d and Frank .lustln Mc[ntosh; THENCE along land now or formerly of Jerry H. Schofield and Frank Justin Mclntosh the following tour (4) courses and distances: Noah 11 degrees 31 minutes I0 seconds West, 210.00 feet; North 19 degrees 16 mlnutes 00 seconds Wesl, :344.00 feet; South 65 degrees 47 minutes 10 seconds West, 213.37 feet; South 19 desrees 16 minutes OO seconds Esst, $50.15 feet to thenortherly sid¢ofMein Road (NYS Route 25); TIIF..NCE along the northerly side of Main Road {NYS Route 25) the following two (2) courses sad distances; I) South 65 degrees 23 minutes 50 seconds West, 285,.49 feet; 2) South 66 degrees 36 minutes 40 seconds West, 589 52 feet to lend now or formerly of.IEM Realty Co.; THENCE along land now or £ormerly of JEM Realty Co. the following four (4) courses and d~stances: 1) North 41 degrees 39 minutes I0 seconds Wesl, 1084.54 that; 2) North 65 degrees 07 minutes 50 seconds East, 376,40 feet; 3) North 32 degrees 29 minutes 10 seconds West, 982,87 feet; 4) North 32 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West, 426.81 feet to the approximate high water mark of Long Island Sound; TI IENCF, along the approximate high wat~ mark of Long Island Souud the followin8 foe teen (14) tle-llnc courses and distances: 1) 2) 4) 5) North 55 degrees 13 minutes 20 seconds East, 41 44 feel North 40 degree~ 13 minutes 18 ~econds East, 162.82 feet; North 48 degrees 59 minutes 18 seconds East, 156.47 f~ct; North 53 degrees 12 minutes 47 seconds East, 85.a9 feet; North 33 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds East, 156.54 feet; Page 4 of 5 6) North 25 degrees 04 minutes 36 seconds East 7) North 49 degrees 30 minutes 59 seconds East 8) North 64 degrees 30 minutes 21 aeconds East 9) North 55 degrees 49 minutes 13 seconds East 10) North 65 degrees 46 minutes 13 seconds East 11) North 45 degrees 07 minutes 11 seconds East 12) North 55 degrees 35 minutes 02 seconds East 13) North 45 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East 14) North 27 degrees 45 minutes 52 seconds East 352.41 feet; 81.53 feet; 163.50 feet; 172.29 feet; 154.46 feet; 135.34 feet; 214.28 feet; 362.94 feet; 504.31 feet to land now or formerly of Floyd THENCE along land now or formerly of Floyd F. King, Jr. the following fourteen (14) courses and distances: 1) South 30 degrees 10 minutes 40 seconds East, 926.10 feet; 2) South 31 degrees 03 minutes 40 seconds East, 300.01 feet; 3) South 28 degrees 19 minutes 30 seconds East, 89.61 feet; 4) South 13 degrees 46 minutes 30 seconds East, 33.68 feet; 5) South 27 degrees 56 minutes 50 seconds West, 65.47 feet; 6) South 00 degrees 19 minutes 40 seconds East, 179.94 feet; 7) South 01 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds East, 300.20 feet; 8) South 03 degrees 40 minutes 00 seconds East, 100.00 feet; 9) South 00 degrees 04 minutes 20 seconds West, 172.71 feet; 10) South 05 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds East, 100.93 feet; 11) South 00 degrees 39 minutes 30 seconds East, 100.15 feet; 12) South 01 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East, 434.17 feet; 13) South 07 degrees 02 minutes 00 seconds East, 40.19 feet; 14) South 76 degrees 49 minutes 10 seconds West, 155.11 feet; THENCE still along land now or formerly of Floyd F. King, Jr. and along land now or formerly of John Abadiotakis and Christian Abadiotalds, South 24 degreea 34 minutes 30 seconds East, 805.00 feet to the northerly side of Main Road (NYS route 25), the point or place of BEGINNING. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS~ BENNETT ORLOWSICI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-3136 Telephone (631) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 25, 2000 Gentlemen: As you are aware, the Planning Board for many months has reviewed the site plan proposal of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. The subject 145-acre site located on the north side of New York State Route 25, identified by Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-035.00-01.00-025.000, and referred to as Peconic Landing, is in a zoning use district permitting a life care community. The proposal to develop a life care complex at this site consisting of 250 residential units, a community center and care facility for both enriched living and nursing care has been considered by the Board, the staff and consultants, and following a public hearing, conditional final approval was granted. The Planning Board has determined that all of the conditions of approval have been satisfied and the Peconic Landing plan meets the requirements of the Southold Town Code. This is to further confirm that the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has received the final site plan and the applicant, Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., has fulfilled and completed all site plan requirements. VeB/.-t, oaJy yours, ,, / Bennett O'rlowski, Jr. Chairman New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook. New York 11790-23,56 Phone: (631)444-0365 · FAX: (631)444-0360 WebsJte: www.dec.state.ny.us September 2l, 2000 Chiles R. Cuddy Attorney at Law 445 Griffing Avenue PO Box 1547 Riverhead, New York 1190t NYSDEC Application ID, #1-4738-01805/00001 U.S. Retirement Colmnunities Peeonic Landing at Soutlmld John P. Cahiil '. Commissioner Dear Mr. Cuddy: I am in receipt of revised plans from Thomas C. Wolpert of Young and Young, which clearly reflect the reeonmaendation from the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to retain Brecknock Hall, its associated garage, greemhouse and wood fi~me barn. A Notice of Comptete Application is being prepared for pubhcation in the Environmental Notice Bulletin and official Town newspaper. We anticipate issuing the permit on October 21, 2000, providing no substantive comments are received from the public, If you have any questions regarding this matter~ please contact me at 631-444-0365. Sincerely, Carol A. Farkas Environmental Analyst I CAF:cg cc: T. Wolpert R. Cowen Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 MEMORANDUM BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOL~ Fax (516) 765-1823 Tclcphone (516) 765-1802 S£P 2 2 20U0 TO: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board FROM: Building Department DATE: September 22, 2000 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN CERTIFICATION Project: Peconic Landin,q Location Rt. 25, Greenport SCTM# 1000 - Section 35 - Block 1 - Lot 25 Date of Last Revision Sept. 6, 2000 1. THE PROPOSED USE Life Care Facility AND ACCESSORY USE AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN IS/ARE PERMITTED IN THIS HD DISTRICT. 2. PROPOSED AND EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 100 OF SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 3. ALL STRUCTURES COMPLY WITH SETBACKS AS CONTAINED IN BULK SCHEDULES OR ELSEWHERE IN CHAPTER 100. Authorized Signature New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ~/~ ~.o~~~ ~ Division of Environmental Permits, Region One .o . < Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 ~ .,~__ ~ ¢ O' Phone: (631) 444-0365 · FAX: (631) 444-0360 ..) ' Website: www,dec.state.ny.us John P. Cahill Commissioner September 7, 2000 Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: NYSDEC Application I.D. #1-4738-01805/00001 Peconic Landing at Soutbold Dear Mr. Wolpert: The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation has reviewed additional documentation of the former Floyd Estate, "Brecknock". It is the opinion of OPRHP that Brecknock Hall and its associated out buildings and landscaped setting meet the criterial for inclusion in the State and National Register. Brecknock Hall, its associated garage and greenhouse, and the large wood framed barn west of the proposed access road are contributing components of the Estate and should be retained and incorporated into the planned development of the property. Although the barn is proposed for demolition, there is no construction planned at that location other than the future western access road. The barn appears sound, was designed with considerable attention to architectural detail and represents the post agricultural activity associated with a working country estate. The Conditioned Negative Declaration, dated August 10, 1998, issued by the Town of Southold Planning Board (Lead Agency) specifically states that the applicant must comply with the requirements of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation and referenced a letter dated August 5, 1998. The letter, which was addressed to the Town of Southold Planning Board, details Brecknock Hall as being significant architecturally and by association with persons important in the history of Southold. Associated buildings, structures, and landscape features related to the estate must also be considered in evaluating the impact of this project. Pursuant to Part 617.7(c)(1)(v), criteria considered as indicators of significant adverse impacts on the environment include the impairment of the character or quality of important historical, archeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources of existing community or neighborhood character. As an involved agency, we are required to assess the entire scope of a project and not a small segment. Therefore, a revised plan must be submitted which clearly shows that the applicant proposes to retain the aforementioned structures designated by OPRHP as eligible for inclusion in the State and National Register. Under SEQR, failure to comply with this request can result in denial of the permit. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. September 7, 2000 Upon receipt of the revised plans which clearly reflect my recommendation, a Notice of Complete Application will be issued for publication. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 631-444-0365. Sincerely, Carol A. Farkas Environmental Analyst I CAF:cg cc: U.S. Retirement Communities at Peconic Landing OCT ! 3 2000 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ~)i l iolo This Declaration made and dated the ~, ~ day of,~mt, 2 00, by PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC., with an office at Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, hereina!~er referred to as the "Declarant". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. is the owner in fee simple of certain lands located on the northerly side of New York State Route 25, C-reenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, SeCtion 035.00, Block 01.00, Lot 025.000, and more particularly described on the annexed Schedule A; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting ofsnid approval, the owner has deemed it necessary, for the best interests of the Town of Southold, the owner, and the interests of the surrounding community, that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said parcel, and that the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office. NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarant for the purpose of carrying out the intents above-expressed does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereinafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon ali purchasers and holders of said premises, its successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That the Declarant will preserve and maintain the external design of the structures known as Brecknock Hall, the existing barn, adjacent garage and greenhouse which are located on the property described in Schedule A. Page 1 of 5 2. That Declarant's efforts to preserve and maintain the character of the present structures will not preclude e~erior or interior renovation to provide for the safe and efficient use of the structures. 3. That any substantial proposed change in the exterior design of the structures shall be subject to approval by the Southold Town Architectural Review Board. 4. That the use of Brecknock HaH, the existing barn, adjacent garage and greenhouse shah be determined only by the Declarant, its successors and assigns. 5. That the within Declaration can be modified only at the request of the owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southoid after a public heating. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public heating, but their consent to such modification shall not be required. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant above-named has executed the foregoing Declaration the day and year first above-written. PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. By: William G. Thompson, President STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK On the ~ '~ - day of Augur,, in the year 2000, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared WILLIAM G. THOMPSON, personally known to me, or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument. Public JOAN M. LUCA Page 2 of 5 NOTARYPUBLIC, Sta~oofNe~Yo~ Qualified in Suffolk County ~, OomR'~8~o~ ~4~lm8 dim 31, Page 3 of 5 SCHEDULE A All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a granite monument found on the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) at the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of John Abadiotakis and Christian Abadiotakis, formerly of ri. Dwight Ripley, being the southeasterly corner ofthe premises herein described: RUNNING THENCE. from said point of beginning South 66 degrees 01 minutes 20 seconds West along the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25), 634.76 feet to a monument found and land now or formerly of Jerry H. Schofieid and Frank Justin Mclntosh; THENCE along land now or formerly of Jerry H. Schofield and Frank Justin Mclntosh the following four (4) courses and distances: 1) North 11 degrees 31 minutes 10 seconds West, 210.00 feet; 2) North 19 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West, 344.00 feet; 3) South 65 degrees 47 minutes 10 seconds West, 213.37 feet; 4) South 19 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds East, 550.15 feet to the northerly side of Main Road ('NYS Route 25); THENCE along the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) the following two (2) courses and distances: I) South 65 degrees 23 minutes 50 seconds West, 285.49 feet; 2) South 66 degrees 36 minutes 40 seconds West, 589.52 feet to land now or formerly of JEM Realty Co.; THENCE along land now or formerly of JEM Realty Co. the following four (4) courses and distances: 1) North 41 degrees 39 minutes 10 seconds West, 1084.54 feet; 2) North 65 degrees 07 minutes 50 seconds East, 376.40 feet; 3) North 32 degrees 29 minutes 10 seconds West, 982.87 feet; 4) North 32 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West, 426.81 feet to the approximate high water mark of Long Island Sound; THENCE along the approximate high water mark of Long Island Sound the following fourteen (14) tie-line courses and distances: 1) North 55 degrees 2) North 40 degrees 3) North 48 degrees 4) North 53 degrees 5) North 33 degrees 6) North 25 degrees 7) North 49 degrees 8) North 64 degrees 9) North 55 degrees 13 minutes 20 seconds East, 41.44 feet; 13 minutes 18 seconds East, 162.82 feet; 59 minutes 18 seconds East, 156.47 feet; 12 minutes 47 seconds East, 85.49 feet; 06 minutes 38 seconds East, 156.54 feet; 04 minutes 36 seconds East, 352.41 feet; 30 minutes 59 seconds East, 81.53 feet; 30 minutes 21 seconds East, 163.50 feet; 49 minutes 13 seconds East, 172.29 feet; Page 4 of 5 10) North 65 degrees 46 minutes 13 seconds East, 154A6 feet; 11) North 45 degrees 07 minutes 11 seconds East, 135.34 feet; 12) North 55 degrees 35 minutes 02 seconds East, 214.28 feet; 13) North 45 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East, 362.94 feet; 14) North 27 degrees 45 minutes 52 seconds East, 504.31 feet to land now or formerly of Floyd F. King., Jr.; THENCE along land now or formerly of Floyd F. King, Jr. the following fourteen (14) courses and distances: 1) South 30 degrees 10 minutes 40 2) South 31 degrees 03 minutes 40 3) South 28 degrees 19 minutes 30 4) South 13 degrees 46 minutes 30 5) South 27 degrees 56 minutes 50 6) South 00 degrees 19 minutes 40 7) South 01 degrees 34 minutes 00 8) South 03 degrees 40 minutes 00 9) South 00 degrees 04 minutes 20 10) South 05 degrees 18 minutes 40 11) South 00 degrees 39 minutes 30 12) South 01 degrees 45 minutes 00 13) South 07 degrees 02 minutes O0 14) South 76 degrees 49 minutes 10 seconds East, 926.10 feet; seconds East, 300.01 feet; seconds East, 89.61 feet; seconds East, 33.68 feet; seconds West, 65.47 feet; seconds East, 179.94 feet; seconds East, 300.20 feet; seconds East, 100.00 feet; seconds West, 172.71 feet; seconds East, 100.93 feet; seconds East, 100.15 feet; seconds East, 434.17 feet; seconds East, 40.19 feet; seconds West, 155.11 feet; THENCE still along land now or formerly of Floyd F. King, Jr. and along land now or formerly of John Abadiotakis and Christian Abadiotakis, South 24 degrees 34 minutes 30 seconds East, 805.00 feet to the northerly side of Main Road (NYS route 25), the point or place of BEGINNING. Page 5 of 5 Box 1547 ~lverl~eat[, N~ 11901 CHARLES R. C17DDY ATTOR NEY ,\T L 445 GR[FFING .\V'IE NUE I,U\'EI~HI~ \ I), N E~~ YORK TE L: (631) 369-8200 FAX: (631) E-mail: crcudcly (U'eart hh~b.~,et September 15, 2000 Mr. Robert Kassner Site Plan Coordinator Planning Department Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Res Peconic Landing at Southol~, Inc. 8EP .L 5 Dear Mr. Kassner: Enclosed are 3 (three) sets of the General Lay-out, i.e., the site plan, for Peconic Landing. Please note that the plan and lay-out presented include the following: Site Plan & Details (Sheets 1-5 of 13 last dated September 6, 2000, Sheets 6-8 of 13 last dated November 24, 1998, Sheet 9 of 13 last dated September 13, 2000 and Sheets 10-13 of 13 last dated November 24, 1998). These plans have been amended to move the cottages outside of the scenic easement and to address the comments of the NYSDEC relative to retaining certain existing structures in the vicinity of Brecknock Hall. In accordance with our discussion, would you please present one copy of this plan to the Building Department for certification. Enclosures CRC:cg Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy PLANNIN~ BOARD MEMBEI~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ~r Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-3136 Telephone (631) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: R~: DATE: Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer(~ Peconic Landing Route 25, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 September ~[5, 2000 Please review the attached for certification. PLANNING BOARD MEMB~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman W1LLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-3136 Telephone (631) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Gregory Yakaboski, Town Attorney Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer ~ Declaration of Covenants & Restrictions Peconic Landing of Southold Route 25, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 September 15, 2000 Please review the attached for legal sufficiency. PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSK/, JR. Chairman WILLIA~I J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, dR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-3136 Telephone (631) 765-1938 PLANNING BOA_RD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 12, 2000 Charles Cuddy, Esq. P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Cuddy: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, September 11, 2000: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional extension of conditional approval from August 28, 2000 to October 2, 2000. Conditional final approval was granted on August 31, 1998. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Chairman 120. Bo× 1547 Riverlnead, NY 1190] C~I ARLES R. Ct rDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRIFIZlNG AVENUE RIXTE[~t IL:AI), NEW YOIC. K TEL: (631) 369-8200 FAX: (631) 369-9(k~ E-mail: c rcuddy~;,ea rthhnk.net AUgUst 31, 2000 Mr. Robert Kassner Site Plan Coordinator Planning Department Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peoonia Landing mt southold, Ino. Dear Mr. Kassner: I am enclosing a copy of the Declaration pertaining to Brecknock Hall and the barn. As you will note, it has been signed by William G. Thompson as President of PeconicLanding at Southold, Inc. This will be recorded prior to the signing of the site plan. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy CRC:cg Enclosure SEP 0 5 2O00 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS This Declaration made and dated the ~ ~¢bday of August, 2000, by PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC., with an office at Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, hereinafter referred to as the "Declarant". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. is the owner in fee simple of certain lands located on the northerly side of New York State Route 25, Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 035.00, Block 01.00, Lot 025.000, and more particularly described on the annexed Schedule A; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of said approval, the owner has deemed it necessary, for the best interests of the Town of Southold, the owner, and the interests of the surrounding community, that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said parcel, and that the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office. NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarant for the purpose of carrying out the intents above-expressed does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereinal~er be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers and holders of said premises, its successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That the Declarant will preserve and maintain the external design of the structures known as Brecknock Halt and the existing barn, which are located on the property described in Page 1 of 5 Schedule A. 2. That Declarant's efforts to preserve and maintain the character of the present structures will not preclude exterior or interior renovation to provide for the safe and efficient use of the structures. 3. That any substantial pwposed change in the exterior design of the structures shall be subject to approval by the Southold Town Architectural Review Board. 4. That the use of Brecknock Hall and the existing barn shall be determined only by the Declarant, its successors and assigns. 5. That the within Declaration can be modified only at the request ofthe owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold a~er a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing, but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant above-named has executed the foregoing Declaration the day and year first above-written. PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. William G. Thompson, STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) On the _~ ~__Wg/day of August, in the year 2000, before me, the undersigned, person, ally appeared WILLIAM G. THOMPSON, personally known to me, or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and Page 2 of 5 acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument. Notary Public CHARLES R. CUDDY Not~y Publlo, 8tare of New Yolk No. 5872225 Qualified In 8L~oik County Commission Expk~ December Page 3 of 5 SCHEDULEA All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a granite monument found on the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) at the southwesterly coroer of land now or formerly of John Abadiotakis and Christian Abadiotakis, formerly of H. Dwight Ripley, being the southeasterly corner of the premises herein described: RUNNING THENCE from sa. id point of beginning South 66 degrees 01 minutes 20 seconds West along the northerly side of Ma~n Road (NYS Route 25), 634.76 feet to a monument found and land now or formerly of Jerry H. Schofield and Frank Justin Mclntosh; THENCE along land now or formerly of Jerry H. Schofield and Frank Justin Mclntosh the following four (4) courses and distances: 1) North 11 degrees 31 minutes 10 seconds West, 210.00 feet; 2) North 19 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West, 344.00 feet; 3) South 65 degrees 47 minutes 10 seconds West, 213.37 feet; 4) South 19 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds East, 550.15 feet to the northeriy side of Main Road 0x!YS Route 25); THENCE along the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) the following two (2) courses and distances: 1) South 65 degrees 23 minutes 50 seconds West, 285.49 feet; 2) South 66 degrees 36 minutes 40 seconds West, 589.52 feet to land now or formerly of JEM Realty Co.; THENCE along land now or formerly of J-EM Realty Co. the following four (4) courses and distances: 1) North 41 degrees 39 minutes I0 seconds West, 1084.54 feet; 2) North 65 degrees 07 minutes 50 seconds East, 376.40 feet; 3) North 32 degrees 29 minutes 10 seconds West, 982.87 feet; 4) North 32 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West, 426.81 feet to the approximate high water mark of Long Island Sound; THENCE along the approximate high water mark of Long Island Sound the following fourteen (14) tie-line courses and d~stances: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) North 55 degrees 13 minutes 20 seconds East, 41.44 feet; North 40 degrees 13 minutes 18 seconds East, 162.82 feet; North 48 degrees 59 minutes 18 seconds East, 156.47 feet; North 53 degrees 12 minutes 47 seconds East, 85.49 feet; North 33 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds East, 156.54 feet; Page 4 of 5 6) North 25 degrees 04 minutes 36 seconds East, 352.41 feet; 7) North 49 degrees 30 minutes 59 seconds East, 81.53 feet; 8) North 64 degrees 30 minutes 21 seconds East, 163.50 feet; 9) North 55 degrees 49 minutes 13 seconds East, 172.29 feet; 10) North 65 degrees 46 minutes 13 seconds East, 154.46 feet; 11) North 45 degrees 07 minutes I 1 seconds East, 135.34 feet; 12) North 55 degrees 35 minutes 02 seconds East, 214.28 feet; 13) North 45 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East, 362.94 feet; 14) North 27 degrees 45 minutes 52 seconds East, 504.31 feet to land now or formerly of Floyd F. King., Jr.; THENCE along land now or formerly of Floyd F. King, Jr. the following fourteen (14) courses and distances: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 1o) 11) 12) 13) 14) South 30 degrees 10 South 31 degrees 03 South 28 degrees 19 South 13 degrees 46 minutes South 27 degrees 56 minutes South 00 degrees 19 minutes South 01 degrees 34 minutes South 03 degrees 40 minutes South 00 degrees 04 minutes minutes 40 seconds East, 926.10 feet; minutes 40 seconds East, 300.01 feet; minutes 30 seconds East, 89.61 feet; 30 seconds East, 33.68 feet; 50 seconds West, 65.47 feet; 40 seconds East, 179.94 feet; 00 seconds East, 300.20 feet; 00 seconds East, 100.00 feet; 20 seconds West, 172.71 feet; South 05 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds East, 100.93 feet; South 00 degrees 39 minutes 30 seconds East, 100.15 feet; South 01 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East, 434.17 feet; South 07 degrees 02 minutes 00 seconds East, 40.19 feet; South 76 degrees 49 minutes 10 seconds West, 155.11 feet; THENCE still along land now or formerly of Floyd F. King, Jr. and along land now or formerly of John Abadiotakis and Christian Abadiotakis, South 24 degrees 34 minutes 30 seconds East, 805.00 feet to the northerly side of Main Road (NYS route 25), the point or place of BEGINNING. Page 5 of 5 Ewing Cole Cherry Brott Date: 08/24~00 Town of Southold Architects Engineers lnteriorDesigners Planners [Federal Reserve Bank Building Independence Mall West 100 North 6t~ Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215.923.2020 Fax 215,573.9163 Transmittal 145 Teepee Trail Project: Peconic Landing Southold, NJ 11971 Project No.: 97012.901 Re: Attn: Mr. Robert G. Kassner We are sending you: Item 1 2 ECCB [] Attached [] Under separate cover via: [] Federal Express [] Copy of Letter [] Submittals [] Change Order [] First Class Mail [] Originals [] Product Data [] Specifications [] Courier [] Prints [] Samples [] Other [] UPS Description Code Prepared by Barton Associates Elevation of Health and Community Center Elevation of Apartment House K K No. of Copies 3 3 A Reviewed, no further submittal required D Rejected G Provide B Reviewed as noted, no further submittal required E Resubmit H For review C Reviewed as noted, resubmit for record F Not I For approval reviewed copies for distribution J For your records K For your use L As requested Direct Dial 215.625.4690 Copies to: J. Woolford - USRC, J. Capelli and M. Hebden - ECCB and By: File 1~O. Flox 1547 I~iv,,d~ead, NY 11901 CHARLES R. CI JDDY ATTOI.~NL:'~ ,\F 1.,kW 445 GI~IFFING ,\VENUIi I-~IV[~I~IIt~/\I), NEW YOI~.K TEL: (031) 369-82D0 FAX: (63l) 360 E-mai]: creuddy((i;eart Mink,. net August 21, 2000 Mr. Robert Kassner Site Plan Coordinator Planning Department Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 AUG 2 'uuu bO~.t*( ~,a 7bwn Plannin~g Soard Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Dear Mr. Kassner: I am enclosing a letter from John Dussling regarding the approval of the Peconic Landing plans by the Architectural Review Committee. Based upon my conversation with Garrett Strong, who had recollections similar to Mr. Dussling's, I am hopeful that you will record Peconic Landing as complying with A.RoC. requirements. I will continue to attempt to obtain plans and a material schedule. However, in the interim, based upon the procedure in effect at the time of Peconic Landing's presentation, I request that you note compliance with the A.R.C.'s requirements. CRC:cg Enclosure Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy/~ The Georgetown Building 101ChesleyDrive, Suite 200 Media, PAl9063-1761 610-627-2330 Fax: 610-627-2320 Springton DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC August 15, 2000 Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. Attorney at Law 445 Griffing Avenue P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Charles: In 1998 and 1999, two meetings were held with our architects, Mark Hebden and Bob McConnell of Ewing Cole Cherry Brott, with the Architectural Review Committee (A.R.C.) of Southold Town. The first meeting was held on Tuesday, July 28, 1998. We had expected to receive final approval of our plans from the A.R.C. at that meeting, to satisfy that requirement for the Planning Board Meeting on August 10, 1998. The A.R.C. (led by Rob Brown and Garrett Strang), approved all of our building designs, materials and our landscaping plan. However, they suggested that we use more than one or two exterior colors on the cottages. They asked us to return to them with a chart showing the desired colors and on which buildings the colors would appear. On Tuesday, February 11, 1999, we met again with the A.R.C. led by Mr. Brown and Mr. Strang. The February 11 committee included Mr. Brown, Mr. Strang, two of the original committee members and one new member. We presented our color and material boards to them. It was very well received and they voted unanimously to approve our plans. They also praised the overall design because it conformed to the local architecture. Mr. Brown said a report of their approval would be sent to the Planning Board. Later that week, Bob Kassner confirmed to me that he had received verbal approval from the A.R.C. August 16, 2000 Page 2 To date, I have never received any written confirmation of the A.R.C. approval. I don't know who at the town is responsible for recording these meetings and approvals, but the above information has been extracted from meeting minutes and notes that we kept. If you need any additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, ssling JFD/cac CC: Jay Woolford Avery Rockefeller CharlesCuddy6.doc PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSO BENNETT ORLOWSICI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAJVI, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Robert Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Peconic Landing August 8, 2000 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-3136 Telephone (631) 765-1938 In preparation for the final approval of Peconic Landing, the Planning Board must send a recommendation to the Town Board regarding the amendment of the scenic conservation easement on the subject property. Three things must be done prior to placing Peconic Landing on the Planning Board agenda for final action: The wording of the proposed amendment must be reviewed with the Planning Board and legal counsel. A resolution must be passed and a memo must be drafted requesting consideration of this amendment at a Town Board meeting. Requests for appointments to the Town Board must be~ ~ submitted by the Wednesday prior to the meeting. ,/ Finally, a brief explanation of the proposed amendment must be drafted, as well as the reasons why the Planning Board is supporting this change. In the preparation of this memorandum, please find out from legal counsel what steps the Town Board must take in order to adopt the proposed amendment to the easement, (e.g. public hearing) and state those requirements in the memorandum. Cc: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman (3HARLES R. (~UDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW August 8, 2000 21100 Gregory F. Yakaboski Southold Town Attorney $0ut!lold town Planning goard Valerie Scopaz and Bob Kassner Planming Department PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Dear Mr. Yakaboski, Ms. Scopaz and Mr. Kassner: A Corrective Amended Grant of Scenic Easement affecting the Peconic Landing proposal was filed on September 10. 1984. I enclose a copy. Unfortunately, the 1 st and 2nd pages are difficult to read. However, at page 4 please note the following: 4. The nature, character and extent of limitations on the within grant of scenic easement are as follows: (b) Roads with necessary recharge basins for road drainage may be constructed to provide access to and from surrounding properties of the Grantor, as well as the construction of jogging paths and equestrian trails. Under the circumstances it would appear to me that the scenic easement need be amended only ro move the lineto avoid' '" " "' ~nc uolng resloellL~m structm'es witl-dn the easement area. Please advise if you disagree with my understanding otherwise I will proceed with an amendment to the description of the parcels included in the easement and include an additional area to compensate for the movement of the present easement line. CRC:ms Very truly yours, ToI~I~ (6§ l) 727%2§0~ I:ae.~mil~ (6§1) 727.0144 l-lO W.A.qD W. YOUFIO, Lend TUOIdA~ (L WOLI~RT, PuKauional JOI~M ~eNI, IURI~, La~d gune~lo~ August 4, 2000 Al-TN: Mr. Bob Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Planning Dept. 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: PECONIC LANDING AT $OUTHOLD At Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Kassner: Enclosed is one (1) set of the Site Plan & Details (Sheets 1-13) last dated November 24, 1998. These plans are forwarded for your review, as discussed at the 3uly 26, 2000 meeting in Southold Town Hall. ff you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact us. TCW ;i; End. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.fi. CC: Mr. 3ohn F. Dussling Mr. Denny Wilhelm Mr. Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. AUG 2000 Southold ToWa Planning Board 120. Bo× 1547 l'~iverheac]. NY 11901 C~IARLES R. CI IDI)Y ATTORNEY ,\T 1. AW 445 G~I FF/NG AVEN{ !E fdVERHEAD, NEW YOIIK August 4, 2000 TEl.: (631) ~5%82g0 FAX: (631) 369-c)(kq0 E-mail: crcuctdyffi e~rt hli.k.l,et Valerie Scopez Southold Town Planning Department PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Dear Ms. Scopez: In reviewing the scenic easement covenant, it appears to me that Page 4 of the easement which is dated 12/13/83, at Liber 9506, Page 268, permits roads to be constructed through the easement area [Paragraph 4(b)]. Under the circumstances, we propose to have Howard Young change the scenic easement lines where dwellings touch and intersect the easement line and to provide an additional area for the scenic easement at either the easterly side or the northerly end of the property, I would be pleased to discuss this with you so that we can resolve this matter in an manner acceptable to the Town. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy [) CRC:cg July 27, 2000 Gentlemen: As you are aware, the Planning Board for many months has reviewed the site plan proposal of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. The subject 145-acre site located on the north side of New York State Route 25, identified by Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-035.00- 01.00-025.000, and referred to as Peconic Landing, is in a zoning use district permitting a life care community. The proposal to develop a life care complex at this site consisting of 250 residential units, a community center and care facility for both enriched living and nursing care has been considered by the Board, the staff and consultants, and following a public hearing, conditional final approval was granted. The Planning Board has determined that all of the conditions of approval have been satisfied and the Peconic Landing plan meets the requirements of the Southold Town Code. This is to further confirm that the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has received the final site plan and the applicant, Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., has fulfilled and completed all site plan requirements. Very truly yours, July 27, 2000 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Gentlemen: This is to acknowledge the understanding of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. that no building permit will be issued and, in fact, the site plan will not be signed by the chairman of the Planning Board unless and until the performance bond or a letter of credit in a satisfactory form is presented to the Town, together with payment of the engineering review fee. It is our understanding that upon presentation of the above documents and payment of the fee that a signed site plan will be delivered to us and that building permits for the work will be issued in accordance with the requirements of the Building Department. Very truly yours, PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. Agreed and consented to: William G. Thompson, President (~HARLES ~. ~IJDD¥ ATTORNEY AT LAW July 27, 2000 Mr. Robert Kassner Site Plan Coordinator Planning Department Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 O1 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Dear Mr. Kassner: I am enclosing a copy of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions with respect to Brecknock Hall which was previously submitted. If agreeable to you, I will simply add that the existing barn at the site shall be preserved and maintained in the same fashion as Brecknock Hall. Please advise. CRC:JML Enclosure Very truly yours, DECLie~V~T~ON ~ND COVENANTS ~D RESTRICTIONS This Declaration made and dated the PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, Southold, New York 11971, "Declarant". __day of July, 1998 by INC., with an office at Main Road, hereinafter referred to as the WI TNE S SETH ; WHEREAS, PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. is the owner in fee simple of certain lands located on the northerly side of NYS Route 25, Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 035.00, Block 01.00, Lot 025.000, and more particularly described on the annexed Schedule A; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of said approval, the owner has deemed it necessary to be for the best interests of the Town of Southold, the owner and the interests of the surrounding community that the within covenants and restric- tions be imposed on said parcel, and that the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's office. NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarant for the purpose of carrying out the intents above-expressed does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereinafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers and holders of said premises, its successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That the Declarant will preserve and maintain the external design of the structure known as Brecknock Hall, which is located on the property described in Schedule A. 2. That Declarant's efforts to preserve and maintain the character of the present structure will not preclude exterior or interior renovation to provide the structure. 3. That any substantial for the safe and efficient use of proposed change in the exterior design shall be subject to approval by the Southold Town Architec- tural Review Board. 4. That the use of Brecknock Hall shall be determined only by the Declarant, its successors and assigns. 5. That the within Declaration can be modified only at the request of the owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing, but their consent to such modification shall not be required. - 2 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant above-named has executed the foregoing Declaration the day and year first above-written. PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. By: William G. Thompson, President STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ~s.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) On the__ day of in the year 2000, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared WILLIAM G. THOMPSON, personally known to me, or proved to me on the basis of satisfac- tory evidence, to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument. Notary Public - 3 - Title No.: 9608-02466 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT CERTAIN PLOT, PIECE, OR PARCEL OF LAND, SITUATE, LYING, AND BEING AT GREENPORT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK AND STATE OF NEW YORK, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A GP3%NITE MONUMENT FOUND ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF MAIN ROAD (NYS RTE 25) AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LAND NOW OR FORMERLY JOHN ABADIOTAKIS ;LND CHRISTIAN ABADIOTAKIS, FORMERLY H. DWIGHT RIPLEY, BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE PREMISES HEREIN DESCRIBED: RUNNING THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTH 66 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF MAIN ROAD (NYS RTE 25) 634.76 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND AND LAND NOW OR FORMERLY JERRY H. SCHOFIELD A/~DIFRANK JUSTIN MCINTOSH; RUNNING THENCE ALONG LAND NOW OR FORMERLY JERRY H. SCNOFIELD AND FRANK JUSTIN MCINTOSH THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES ~ DISTANCES: 1. NORTH 11 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 210.00 FEET, 2. NORTH 19 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 344.00 FEET, 3. SOUTH 65 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 10 SECOND~ WEST 213.37 FEET, 4. SOUTH 19 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 550.15 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF MAIN ROAD (NYS RTE 25) RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF MAIN ROAD (NYS RTE 25) THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES AND DISTANCES; 1. SOUTH 65 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 285.49 FEET, 2. SOUTH 6~DEGREES 36 MINDES 40 SECONDS WEST 589.52 FEET TO LAND NOW OR FORMERLY JEM REALTY CO.; RUNNING THENCE ALONG LAND NOW OR FORMERLY JEM REALTY CO. THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES AND DISTANCES: 1. NORTH~DEGREES"' 39 MINUTES 10 SECONDS W~ST 1084.54 FEET;T, 2. NORTH 65 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST 376.40 FEET, 3. NORTH 32 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 982.87 FEET, 4. NORTH 32 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST 426.81 FEET TO THE APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER MARK OF LONG ISLAND SOUNDS; RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER MARK OF LONG ISLAND SOUND THE FOLLOWING FOURTEEN (14) TIE-LINE COURSES AND DISTANCES: 1. NORTH 55 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST 41.44 FEET, 2. NORTH 40 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST 162.82 FEET, 3. NORTH 48 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 18 SECONDS'EAST 156.47 FEET, 4. NORTH 53 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST 85.49 FEET, 5. NORTH 33 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 38 SECOND~ EAST 156.54 FEET, 6. NORTH 25 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 36 SECONDS EAST 352.41 FEET, 7. NORTH 49 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 59 SECONUS..EAST 81.53 FEET, 8. NORTH 64 DEGREES 30 MINL~TES 21 SECONDS EAST 163.50 FEET, -LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTIN'~JED- ' 9608-02466 LEGAL ,DESCRIPTION 9. NORTH 55 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST 10. NORTH 65 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST 11. NORTH 45 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST 12. NORTH 55 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 02 SECONDS EAST 13. NORTH 45 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 14. NORTH 27 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST FORMERLY FLOYD F. KING, JR.; 172.29 FEET, 154.46 FEET, 135.34 FEET, ,~ 214.28 FEET, 362.94 FEET, 504.31 FEET TO LAND NOW OR RUNNING THENCE ALONG LAND NOW OR FORMERLY FLOYD F. KING, JR TEE FOLLOWING FOURTEEN (14} COURSES AND DISTANCES: 1. SOUTH 30 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST 926.10 FEET, 2. SOUTH 31 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST 300.01 FEET, 3. SOUTH 28 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 89.61 FEET, 4. SOUTH 13 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 33.68 FEET, 5. SOUTH 27 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 65.47 FEET, 6. SOUTH 00 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST 179.94 FEET 7. SOUTH 01 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 00 SECON]~S EAST 300.20 FEET 8. SOUTH 03 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 100.00 FEET 9. SOUTH 00 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST 172.71 FEET 10. SOUTH 05 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST 100.93 FEET 11. SOUTH 00 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 100.15 FEET 12. SOUTH 01 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 434.17 FEET 13. SOUTH 07 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 40.19 FEET 14. SOUTH 76 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 155.11 FEET RUNNING THENCE STILL ALONG LAND NOW OR FORMERLY FLOYD F. KING, JR AND ALONG LAND NOW OR FORMERLY JOIiN ABADIOTAKIS AND CHRISTIAN ABADIOTAKIS, SOUTH 24 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 805.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF MAIN ROAD (NYS RTE 25) AND THE POINT OR PLACE OF BEGINNING. July 27, 2000 Gentlemen: As you are aware, the Planning Board for many months has reviewed the site plan proposal of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. The subject 145-acre site located on the north side of New York State Route 25, identified by Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-035.00- 01.00-025.000, and referred to as Peconic Landing, is in a zoning use district permitting a life care community. The proposal to develop a life care complex at this site consisting of 250 residential units, a community center and care facility for both enriched living and nursing care has been considered by the Board, the staff and consultants, and following a public hearing, conditional final approval was granted. The Planning Board has determined that all of the conditions of approval have been satisfied and the Peconic Landing plan meets the requirements of the Southold Town Code. This is to further confirm that the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has received the final site plan and the applicant, Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., has fulfilled and completed all site plan requirements. Very truly yours, July 27, 2000 $outhold Town Planning Board Main Road $outhold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at southold, Inc. Gentlemen: This is to acknowledge the understanding of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. that no building permit will be issued and, in fact, the site plan will not be signed by the Chairman of the Planning Board unless and until the performance bond or a letter of credit in a satisfactory form is presented to the Town, together with payment of the engineering review fee. It is our understanding that upon presentation of the above documents and payment of the fee that a signed site plan will be delivered to us and that building permits for the work will be issued in accordance with the requirements of the Building Department. Very truly yours, PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. Agreed and consented to: william G. Thompson, President New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 July 19, 2000 Carol A. Farkas Environmental Analyst NYS DEC Region 1 Building 40 SUNY at Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY 11790 518~237-8643 JUL [ 6 201Ju Southold Town Planning Board NYS DOH/NYS DEC 1-4738-018051/00001 Peconic Landing/Brecknock Hall T/Southold, Suffolk Co. 98PR0237 Dear Ms. Farkas: The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) has received and reviewed additional photographic documentation of the former Floyd Estate "Brecknock." Based on this current information and information in our files gathered in connection with an earlier proposal to nominate the estate to the State and National Register of Historic Places, it is the OPRHP opinion that Brecknock Hall and its associated outbuildings and landscaped setting meet the criteria for inclusion in the State and National Registers. In addition, our staff has reviewed and provided comment on Phase 1 and Phase 2 cultural resource survey reports prepared for this project and has concurred with the proposed scope of Phase 3 data recovery at identified sites. A copy of our letter to the project archeologist indicating acceptance of the scope of data recovery and outlining requirements for submission and implementation of a full data recovery plan is attached. In accordance with Section 14.09 of the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law, it is the OPRHP opinion that de,el .o[3r~'te~.. t~f cond~ll that.~ e. PlXo~ Phase 3 data reCOvery program is completed and that the large barn west of the estate house is retained (see below). Of the buildings within the State and National Register eligible estate complex, the following are considered to be non-contributing to the property's significance for the reasons noted, with reference to the identification numbers and plate numbers from the documentation submitted by Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated and dated February 2000. Demolition or removal of these structures will not impact the historic character the "Brecknock" Estate: Struct. 1/Plate 1 -- Wood-framed structure of unknown use, north of large barn. Severe loss of material' and design integrity (ruin). Struct. 2/Plate 2 -- Open 3-bay shed; corrugated roof and siding. Apparent modern construction (less than 50 years old). Struct. 2AJPI. 3 -- Wood-framed, gable-roofed structure east of structure 2. Loss of material integrity. Struct. 4/Plate 5 -- Wood-framed, gable roofed structure immediately east of large barn. Severe loss of material and design integrity (ruin). Struct. ?/Plate 6 -- Unnumbered, Iow metal building west of Structure 1. Less than fifty years old. An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency Pecon;c Landing DEC 1--4738-018051/000£ OPRHP 98PR0237 July 19, 2000 Struct. 5/Plate 10 -- Abandoned and deteriorated 1 1/2 stoW residence Probably former caretaker's or tenant's residence. Struct. 6/Plate 11 -- Low equipment shed with corrugated metal roof. Less than fifty years old. Struct. 7/Pis 12-13 -- Collapsed structure with attached wire corn crib. Loss of integrity (ruin). The remaining structures, including Brecknock Hall, its associated garage and greenhouse, and the large wood-framed barn west of the proposed access road are contributing components of the Estate and should be retained and incorporated into the planned development of this property. We note that the large barn (structure 3) is proposed for demolition but that no construction is planned at that location other than the future western access road. The barn appears sound, was designed with considerable attention to architectural detail and represents the past agricultural activity associated with a working country estate. In the absence of any information justifying demolition, we recommend retaining the barn. If you have any questions regarding OPRHP review of this project, please contact James Warren at extension 3283 or Douglas Mackay at extension 3291. Si/~;~erely' Ruth L. Pierpont, Director enclosure: 7/18/00 D. Mackey to W. Roberts Copy of structure photos and photo key cc: oLR~bed G. Krassner, Town of Southold w/o encls. Thomas M. Jung, RA, NYS DOH w/o encJs. W. Roberts, Greenhouse Consultants w/o encls. RLP:jw (~HYdILES R. (JUDDY d~kTTORNEY AT LAW July 26, 2000 Robert Kassner site Plan Coordinator Planning Department Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Dear Mr. Kassner: For your records I am enclosing a copy of the sewer agreement between the Village of Greenport and Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. CRC:JML Enclosures Very truly yours, July 26, 2000 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Res Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Gentlemen: This is to acknowledge the understanding of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. that no building permit will be issued and, in fact, the site plan will not be signed by the Chairman of the Planning Board unless and until the performance bond or a letter of credit in a satisfactory form is presented to the Town, together with payment of the engineering review fee. It is our understanding that upon presentation of the above documents and payment of the fee that a signed site plan will be delivered to us and that building permits for the work will be issued in accordance with the requirements of the Building Department. Very truly yours, PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. Agreed and consented to: William G. Thompson, President July 26, 2000 Gentlemen: As you are aware, the Planning Board for many months has reviewed the site plan proposal of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. The subject 145-acre site located on the north side of New York State Route 25, identified by Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-035.00- 01.00-025.000, and referred to as Peconic Landing, is in a zoning use district permitting a life care community. The proposal to develop a life care complex at this site consisting of 250 residential units, a community center and care facility for both enriched living and nursing care has been considered by the Board, the staff and consultants, and following a public hearing, conditional final approval was granted. The Planning Board has determined that all of the conditions of approval have been satisfied and the Peconic Landing plan meets the requirements of the Southold Town Code. This is to further confirm that the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has received the final site plan and the applicant, Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., has fulfilled and completed all site plan requirements. Very truly yours, To: Fl'o~ Date: Pages: Subiect: Carol A. Farkas NYS Dept. Of Environmental Conservation Barry D. Greenhouse July 24, 2000 3, including this page Pcconic Landing, Town of Southold NYSDEC No. 1-4738-01805/00001 OPRHP No. 98PR0237 We have today received final approval of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation ~.ad Historic Preservation, of the data recovery plaos for the Peconic Landing project. A copy of that letter follows. This now concludes all aspects of the archaeological process. Thc OPRI-rP has concluded there are no further archaeological concerns at this time, as the July 18, letter from Doughs P, Mackey indicates. It has approved the data recovery plans submitted by our firm, and has recommended that that work be implemented as approptiate to the project development, at any time pdor to initiating construction in those two areas. There are no further archaeological restrictions to consttuct/on in any other areas of the project. Although St,age 3 data recovery fieldwork cam begin at ~my time, it need not begin at rhi~ time. 'the only archaeological stipulation is that data recovery f~.ldwork be completed before consu-uction in those areas only. There are no further archaeological restxictions to construction in any other portions of the proposed development_ Please feel free to call me if you have a~y questions. Cotpotat~ 6110 ~ Chase C/tc. le At~mt~ Geogi~ Phonc (770) 988-9091 F~x: (770) 988-9093 Northeast Re~0n: '40 E.xd~m~ge Place. L3'h floor New York, New York 10005 Phone: (212) 514-9520 Fax: (212) 4500050 To: Company: From: Date: Pages: Subject: John F. Dussiing US Retirement Communltlcs Barry D. Greenhouse ./my 24, 2000 3, includ;ng this page Peconic Landing Data Recoveries We have today received final approval of the data recovexy plans. A copy of the fax from Doug Mackey of OPRHP follows. Corporate:. 6110 Rivet Chase Gircle P~one: (770) 9~-9091 Fax: (770) 988-9093 Northeast Re~on: 40 Exchange Plac% 13'h floor Ncw YorI~ New York 10005 Phone: (212) 514-9520 Fax: (212) 480-9080 -~u1-2~-oo iz:i~ ~R~:eOUSE .~. .york ~i~Oo soeo New York Stsle Office of Parka, Rec~reation and Historic Pruervstlon Historic Pre~entallon Field Services Bureau PeelJle~ Inland, PO JBox 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 William (;rccnho.-~ 'l'hirlcemh New Y~rk. NY Mr_ R(dx:rls. RE: DEC Scope of Work_ Addendum - .Rmgc 3 Peconic Landing 'Project Tr)wn af Soulhold, SutTolk Cuumy ~tSPR0237 Thank yuu fi.~' responding, to [he c:u'licr corem(miS Of th~ O~ce of P~kq. R~'~aliun and llist~ic Prcservmkm (tJPRffi') on ~ ~o~ ~,~k ~,~ I~r t~ a~x,e refercnc~ impact. OFR~' st:,ll'ha~e fevie~-cd thc a~lilional inl~nmrlon ~ m~u,mmnd* I~ t~ complete sc(~ ~ this dine. [;pc,J cumpIcllon ol'~e field work ~iled in Ihi~ complete sco~. OPR}~ ~itl consider mcu~ended. CmpIcd~ ~' ~he ent~ ~ta mov~ wn~ sco~. up lo and includin8 pr,~u~i~ uf ~* et, pi~ of ~ fi~al ~on f~ dis~fi~ will ~ ~cs,~. however. OPR~ wUI elegance ft~r a~l~culogical core,acm of d,c projccl review on~ an end u[ field l~ter for thc ~-co~.er~ wu~ ~s ~n ~cepmd. ORP~ [~ks Ihrward ~ mcelvlng ~he rein det~ili.g your OPR/IP c(~,tlnut.'*, to requ~ th.az you m',mpIc~c furmal D~ Reco~,ery PI:ms lbi' Data R,..uvcry prujecm Such a pla,, xhr. mld incltlde .-,all of [Nc information required b.Y thc acc=lxcd .%'T.atND:xRDS (Section 4.21. and r~comme.~mhzd Ilk.~ S,:c~'ti~y al' ll~ htteri(~r'..l Standards and Guid,;linc~ for Archacoh'~gi=al l)(,ctlrr~n[adon (48 FR 447.34,-447371. Tlli~ [nfonttatlon iF summarized hi tl~ t%,dvigo¢.¥ Cour,;it roe I IL, i[mic Prc.~:rvation ia irs "Rccomraq:nded Approach fr~-- Consulu~ion u. Recovery of Signiticam In/onnmiun Imm Archeologi,:al Sites' -',~: The plan shuuld .q~eclfy: ia) Thc rt..cults or' ~-cx. lo.x rt:~izrch relev~, Io the proj~t: (b) research p~hlcms ur questions co ~ add,sod with al, cxphmution uf IhcJr efl~c,iv(mcss ~d I~w [l~y :a~[y ~o thi~ paniculal' pl'ol~y u,d (~ ~rclB~II1ClliS ~()r pr~enting w~l has ~en fi,and ~d I~lc~ [o [~ punk', r(~:using JUl-24-O0 3.2:19 GRE~)USE new york 2'1~0 9080 IU) ih,: curation of rccover~l ma[,.-riats and reco~'d~ resulting from Ihe daxa rc'covcry in accordanc~ wi[h 36 CFR pa~ 79 (.eXcept in the ca_.~ of u'ncxp~clcd discov¢,'ies ~t~st may ncccl to be considered fnr rcp:~trialion porsua~lc m NAGPRA); and th) pr.ccdurcs Ibr evalua[ing and u-caring discoverie.% of une:s, pcul '~d r,~nlai~l~ ca- ncwJy id.cmlrlt.xt historic prop~r:ie.~ during Ihe cours~ of The proj,~x;L including n¢ce~s~y consult~ion ,.vid, nthcr parlies F,'¢parh,g plans Ibat follow th:se guid~linu's should h~lp to expcxJile fulur¢ projecls. Please em~tac[ me ~( (5151 237~8643 if )'nu hax,¢ any qumstious ce~ardlng ~he ~rchaeulogic'~ componen~ of ihi~ review. ~1003 ~'. 02 Sincerely. Archeology C'~'f,,;a ,aF Park,:_ ge-~u::ui,,n and I li~ii~'i*: Pre~.r,.'atiun/Field .~'vi,..'~'.; Bureau (O,PRHP) ~7/10/00 ~b,, 16:4, ~A~ //09889093 Greer~ouse atlanta 4~ ool~n Dussllng ~001 To: Company: From: Date: Pages: Subject: John F. Dussling US Retirement Commiln]tie8 Barry D. Greenhouse ~ 10, 20oo 5, including this page Peconic Landing Data Recoveries Our reply to Doug Mackey of OPRI-IP follows. Will Roberts spoke with Doug to discuss his concerns. He agreed to accept our reply in fulfillment ofkisJune 9, letter. The~e are no further requir~ents at this time. However, data recovery fieldwork must be completed to the satisfaction of OPRHP prior to construction related activities ~ either of the two archaeologically sensitive areas. We will provide revised budgets for Stage 3 data recovery fieldwork closer to the time you want to schedule that work We look forward to receiving your $1,000 payment for services needed to prepare and coordinate the data recovery plans. Feel free to give me a call if you have arty questions. Corporate: 6H0 Rive~ Cha~e Cite. lc Atlama, Georgia Phone: (~0) F~ (~0) 9~93 Northeast Re,on: 40 Exchange Place, 13°' floor New York, New York 10005 Phone: (212) 514-9520 Fax: (212) 480-§080 07/10/00 ~ON 15:47 F,~ 7709859093 ~lu'] ~/.O-oo 15:o6 G~.E ~'~U~ Green/louse atlanta ~ Open ousslin~ ~/OOZ n~ york 212~0 ~o~0 P_O1 30 July Douglas P. Mackey Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau N.¥.$. Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation Peebles ~sland, P.o. Box 189 Waterford, New York 12188-0189 RE: 98~R0237 2000 Dear Doug: This letter is being sent io reply to your letter of 9 rune 2000. That letter raised five points regarding our Scope-of-Work for Stage 3 Data Recovery Excavations at the two prehistoric sites found within the Pecon~c Landing project area. My £eply addresses the five points in the mame order. 1. Please see figures A and B with this letter for maps showing the sites, their boundaries, and the various positive and negative tests in the vicinity. I have show~ in red the proposed locations of seven excava- tion units for each site. Three additional units will be added for each site based on the results of these We will be pleased to reference Pe¢onie Landing Pre- h~storic Site ~ as A103~001294 and Peconic Landing Prehistoric $i~e ~2 as A103~0.001295 in our ~a~e 3 report. We have previously worked with Anagno~tic Agelarakts of Adelphi University as a physical anthropologist. We p]mn on using his services on this project should a physical anthropologist be required. ~f he is not available, then he should be abl~ to supply a replace- ment. The radiocarbon testing ~111 be ~one by Beta AnalytiC, Inc. of coral Gable~, Florida. Thu Southold Indian Museum of Bayvlew Road, $outhold has expressed interest in obtaining the collections from this project. In telephone conversations they have agreed ~o be the repository for the collections. 07,'10,'00 ~.m~, 18:47 ~AJ. ?TOg88{~OgJ Jul- 10-00 1~:06 GRKE~USE page 2 10 July 2000 We agree to submit one copy of our draft stage 3 report to the ~istoric Preservation Field Services Bureau for review. Upon acceptance of the final report, wo agree supply an additional ten copies for distribution to and final copies will include either original photo- graphs or high quality photostatic ~eproductio~s. We hope that this submission has satisfactorily addressed the five points raised in your letter of 9 June 2000. Should yo0 have any questions, please contact me at (212) 514-9520. we look forward to receiving your approval to begin thls work. Sincerely, William I. Boberts Iv Chief Archaeologist cc: Barry D. Greenhouse O?/~_O/O0 ~lb~, 16:4,' t"',,%~ ?70988900~ 'NEW FRAME GAZEBO .,~'~'-~'...r "' - '- :~ '"" "// O 20 I OO 150 feel SCALE F i qure A Location oX prehistoric site #1 within the northeastern part of the project area. K~¥ ~ N~gative Test 07/10/00 ~iON 16:48 t.'Ay'- 7709889093 Jul-lO-O0 1~:07 0 5O PARKING.AREA SCALE I OO 150 ~ea~ I , ] KEy Positive Test Negative Test Location of prehistoric site ~2 withi~ the cem~ral p~rt of the project area. 07/05/00 ,,~o 17:10 FAX 7700889093 Greenhouse al:lents ~002 New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Peeblcs Isrend, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 William Roberts Greenhouse Consultants 40 Exchange Place Thirteenth Floor, New York, ~ 10005 .~unc 9, 2000 RE: DEC Scop~ of Work, Stage 3 Peconic Landing Project Town of Southold. SuffoLk County 98PR0237 Thank you for requesting thc comments of ~he Office of Parks Recreation and His'to_dc Preservation (OPRHP) on the proposed work scope for thc above referenced project. OPR3IP staff have reviewed your scope of work and offers the following comments The scope of work is generally acceptable and should be incorporated into a fomml Data Retrieval Plan with the following modifications: 1. A map showing the locatioaof the sites, their boundaries, and proposed testing areas should be includect 2. OPRHP site numbers should be referenced for each site (Site numb~s for this project are A10310.001294 and A10310_001295) Although the work scope indicates who some specialists will be for some special services (i.e. flotation, lithic analysis, faunal analysis) a data r~trieval plan should included all specialists that may be needed. This is especially true for a physical anthropologist, as a need for such scxviccs is likely to come at a critical time in project scheduling. Please contact and identify who will be utilized aa a physical anthropologist and which radiocarbon lab will be used should samples be recovered. Curation of material is an integral part of any data recovery project. Thc final Data Recovery Plan should identify what institution will serve as a repository for the final collection. OPRHY understands that final arrangements with an institution may not be determined until the final collection is complemd, however, you should be able to provide documentation that acceptable institutions have been contacted and expressed an interest in accepting the final collection. An Equal Opportu~ty/Afficmaliv& Action Agency 07/05/00 17:10 FMi 7709889093 Greenhouse atlaata John Dussllng W/Il/am Roberts. Greenhouse Consulting Page 2 RE: Phase i Archaeological Investigations, VaJetut~i P~'operO'. Town of PaIadne. Montgomery County 00PR1242 ~003 For dam recover~ investigations one copy of the final report, bound and with original photo~ or high quality reproductions, should be submitted to OPRI42P for rev{ew_ Upon acceptance of the final report, 10 copies should be provided to OPRI-[P for distribution to repositories around the state. This should be written into your Dam Recovery Plan. Please contact me at (518) 2374~3 if you have any questions Sincerely, Historic Preservation l~ogra~ Ana/ys~ Archaeology ~Cc: Barry Greenhouse Of~cm of par~. Recreation ~nd Historic Prese. rv~fio~/Field S~-vices Bureau (OPRtIP) Historic Pre. se~vation Office (S~IPO) 05119100 Se~ 27 8~ 08:51a You~ ~ Youn~ 51~-727-0]q~ F.2 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York ! 1790-2356 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us John P. Cahill Commissioner September 24, 1999 Thomas C. Woipert, P.E. Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: NYSDEC No. 14738-01805/00001 OPRHP No. 98PR0237 Dear Mr. Wolpert: Thc Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) has reviewed the Archeology Reports for the Peconic Landing Project and has the following commentS: Based on the review, it has been determined that Prehistoric Sites # 1 and #2 meet the criteria for listing in the State and National Registers of t-Iistoric Places. The OPRHP recommends avoidance of these archeological sites. Submission of an acceptable avoidance plan, including protection measures, implementing/monitoring procedures, and redesign of the project (if necessary) should be~s_u.¢_mi_'~tt_e~_f.~o_~'..O~P.~R~_ P~!e~vie_~ he[ore ~o.ns .tru~ c_ti~on_b~egins. _ conducted. An appropriate Stage 3 Data Recovery plan should be developed and submitted for OPRHP review [~..~re excava~fion begins. _..~i la addition, the previously requested photographic survey of existing structures within the project area has not been submitted for review by OPRHP. The full evaluation of potential impacts of this project earmot be made until all information is available for review. Please provide additional information pursuant to OPRHP's request and I will forward your response to them. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Robert Kuhn at 518-237-8643, ext 3255. Sincerely, //7 Carol A. Far~s - Environmenhal Analyst CAF:eg STAGE 3 SCOPE-OF-WORK PREHISTORIC SITES 1 AND 2, PECONIC LANDING TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY 98PR0237 This document presents Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated's scope-of-work for Stage 3 Archaeological Data Recovery Excavations at Peconic Landing, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. Two areas of prehistoric use were found during the Stage 1 BI2 survey of this project. Theywere labeled Site 1 and Site 2. Both were determined eligible for the New York State and National Registers of Historic Places. Site #1 is situated on high ground west of the pond in the northwestern section of the project area. It overlooks Long Island Sound. Site #2 is situated on high ground southwest of a wet depression, within the central section of the project area. Site #1 is approximately 4,500 square feet in size. Fourteen shovel tests and two excavation units (3 feet by 3 feet) produced 805 prehistoric artifacts. Seven hundred thirty-nine of these came from two adjacent excavation units. All the artifacts are lithics. No diagnostic artifacts were found within Site #1. No features were identified at this location, but there were artifacts from the subsoil (Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated 1998:15, Appendix 2). Site #2 is approximately 4,200 square feet in size. Eleven shovel tests and two excavation units (3 feet by 3 feet) produced 166 artifacts. Excavation Unit 4 produced 119 artifacts and Excavation Unit 3 produced 30 artifacts. No diagnostic artifacts were found within Site#2. No features were identified, but some artifacts were recovered from the subsoil (GCI 1999:15-16). The only diagnostic prehistoric artifact recovered from the Peconic Landing project was not found on either of the two sites. A complete Rossville projectile point was recovered from the second layer of Shovel Test 617. This location is over 200 feet southwest of Site #1. The primary date range for these points includes the Early and Middle Woodland periods. Neither site produced any diagnostic artifacts or features. It is most important that dating evidence for both sites be found, either in the form of diagnostic artifacts or samples for radiocarbon dating. With dating evidence these two sites would be able to add much more to our knowledge of local and regional prehistory. The finding of features in Sites 1 and 2 would also greatly increase their potential to add to our knowledge of local and regional prehistory. Therefore our efforts during the Stage 3 work will concentrate on finding diagnostic artifacts and features. Scope-of-Work, Peconic Landing Town of Southold, Suffolk Coun~ 98PR0237 May16,2000 Page 2 The search for diagnostic artifacts will consist of the manual excavation of 250 square feet in each of the two sites. Ten formal excavation units, each 5 feet by 5 feet, will be completed in each site. These units will also serve to search for features. This search will also utilize the mechanical scraping of a larger area within each site. The crew will then manually investigate all soil anomalies found. If features are found, they could contain ceramics, lithics, food remains, and ceremonial objects. If bones and plant remains such as seeds are recovered, it may be possible to ascertain which seasons these sites were used. Research Issues 1. Since no dating evidence has been recovered from either Site 1 and Site 2, the most important research question is the date of occupation for the sites. Secondly, were the occupations concurrent? Sites 1 and 2 have produced evidence of the manufacture of stone tools. Was stone tool manufacturing the primary activity engaged upon at these locations, or were they also used for other purposes? Were the occupations of Sites 1 and 2 year-round or seasonal. If the sites were seasonal, were Sites 1 and 2 used at the same or different times of the year. Based on the assumption of the recovery of dating evidence, how did Sites 1 and 2 fit into the settlement patterns of their respective cultural period(s)? What is the spatial distribution of artifacts and features over the landscape? How does Site 1 compare with Site 2? How do these sites compare with local and regional densities, and distribution over time and space? Field Methodology In order to answer the research questions proposed for this data recovery, the field work will concentrate on the exposure of large areas to search for possible features. We anticipate using a crew of four for three months. There will be three primary tasks or phases. The first task to be accomplished will be the excavation of ten excavations units, five by five feet, within both sites. These will begin at the surface and proceed until 0.5 feet of sterile subsoil is removed, unless stopped by obstacles. All soils recovered during the excavation will be screened through ¼-inch mesh to recover artifacts. Stratigraphy will be recorded in plan and section and described on standardized provenance forms, copies of which will be Scope-of-Work, Peconic Landing Town of Southold, Suffolk Counb/ 98PR0237 May 16, 2000 Page 3 included with the field testing report. Soils will be described by reference to Munsell colors and identified as to texture, inclusions, etc. All units will be backfilled after they are recorded. Extra effort for up to two more units has been included in case one or more of the first units recover evidence of a feature. This strategywill allow expansion of the excavation to recover the entire feature. The second task will be the large area exposure. This will utilize a backhoe or similar machine with a fiat blade to mechanically remove the soil within one transect in each site down to the base of the plow-zone. This procedure will be followed by the crew using fiat shovels to scrape the area. The locations of any possible features will then be mapped. The third task will be the excavation of any features found during the scraping. Unless the features appear to be postmolds, either one-quarter or one-half of each will be excavated to determine if they are cultural and prehistoric in date. Cross-sections and plans of all prehistoric features will then be drawn, and the remaining portion of the feature excavated. Samples for radiocarbon dating and flotation will be taken from the features as appropriate. This strategy will be fo[lowed up to a maximum of ten features. If the number of features discovered exceeds ten, then only one-quarter or one-half of any particular feature will be excavated. The remaining portions of features would then be excavated as time allows until we reach our maximum level of effort. If ten or fewer features are found, we anticipate excavating 100 percent of them. If more than ten features are found, we may need to limit feature excavation to a maximum of 50 percent of each so that all can be sampled. All postmolds discovered will be mapped. If only a small number of postmolds are found, all will be cross-sectioned. If many are found, then the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation will be consulted to determine which ones will be cross-sectioned. We propose to mechanically clear one rectangular area, in each site, approximately 120 feet by 30 feet, minus those portions that will have been manually excavated. If any features are found on the edges of this area, the area will be enlarged to recover the remainder of the feature. Should human remains be discovered dudng the fieldwork, then work will cease on that particular location and both the coroner and the Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau will be contacted. Work on the burial(s) will not commence until appropriate arrangements have been made. A physical anthropologist will be contacted to examine the remains should this be deemed advisable by the Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau. The Bureau will make contact with local Native American groups should the remains be determined to Scope-of-Work, Peconic Landing Town of Southold, Suffolk County 98PR0237 May 16, 2000 Page 4 be Native American. Once all appropriate arrangements have been made, then excavation of the burial(s) will recommence. Once work has been completed within Sites 1 and 2, an end-of-fieldwork letter will be written and submitted to the Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau for review. This letter should allow construction activities to proceed in that location. Artifact Processinq and Analysis Procedures for artifact processing and basic stabilization will be established and carded out under the supervision of the Laboratory Director. Processing and analysis of the finds will take place at the Greenhouse Laboratory at 40 Exchange Place in Manhattan. Principles of object conservation will be applied throughout the processing, both in the field, if necessary, and the Greenhouse laboratory, at each of the following stages: 1 ) recovery in the field using inert waterproof collection materials; 2) emergency removal techniques if/as required; 3) cleaning/stabilization procedures in the laboratory; 4) infield or laboratory consolidation as necessary; 5) catalog/inventory recording to provide quantified artifact inventories; and finally, 6) accessible storage techniques using museum quality materials. Artifacts recovered shall be appropriately conserved, curated, and prepared for placement in a repository according to Federal guidelines (36CFR79). Although a large number of artifacts are not expected from this excavation, should artifacts be recovered which appear to be in danger of deterioration, an artifact conservator will be consulted to determine appropriate treatments for their stabilization. Analysis of the data recorded during the excavation and of the artifacts recovered will then proceed. The types of analysis performed will depend upon the variety and amounts of artifacts and samples recovered, as well as the data recorded in the field. It will include analysis of all diagnostic artifacts recovered; study of the debitage from stone tool working activities; and flotation, faunal and floral analyses if sufficient samples are recovered, and radiocarbon dating of selected features should sufficient carbon be recovered. Eugene Boesch will perform the ceramic analysis should ceramics be found. Processing and analysis of flotation samples will be conducted by William Sandy. Lithic analysis will be performed by our Laboratory Director, Paula Crowley. Should animal bones be recovered, then a faunal analyst will be found to analyze these samples. Should human remains be recovered, then a physical anthropologist will be found to analyze them. Should suitable samples be recovered, radiocarbon testing will be done by an outside laboratory. These various analyzes will compare the data from this site with that from other sites. Scope-of-Work, Peconic Landing Town ofSouthold, Su~olk Coun~ 98PR0237 May~6,2000 Page 5 Final Report Following completion of the various analyses, a report will be prepared to meet the standards of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. This report will document the procedures and results of the excavations and analyses. A full catalog of artifacts recovered will be included. The results will include answering the various research questions should this prove possible. The completed report will then be submitted to the Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau for their review. References Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated 1998 Stage % Archaeological survey of the Continuing Care Retirement Community, Peconic Landing at Southold, Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. New York, New York: Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated. 1999 Additional Stage 1 BI2 Archaeological Survey of the Continuing Care Retirement Community, Peconic Landing at Southold, Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. New York, New York: Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated. PHOTOGRAPHS OF STANDING STRUCTURES PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD GREENPORT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK prepared for: Young and Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 prepared by: Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated 40 Exchange Place, 13th Floor New York, New York 10005 February 2000 Figure I Figure 2 LIST OF FIGURES Locations of structures near the southwestern corner of the project area, showing locations of Plates 1 through 9. Locations of structures near the southeastern corner of the project area, showing locations of Plates 10 through 13. Plate 1 Plate 2 Plate 3 Plate 4 Plate 5 Plate 6 Plate 7 Plate 8 Plate 9 Plate 10 Plate 11 Plate 12 Plate 13 LIST OF PLATES View of the ruins of Structure 1 looking south. View of Structure 2 looking northwest. View of Structure 2A, the frame shed adjacent to Structure 2, looking northwest. View of Structure 3 looking northeast. View of the ruins of Structure 4 looking northeast. View of metal building to be retained looking northwest. View of Brecknock Hall looking northwest. View of frame garage to be retained looking west. View of the greenhouse looking west. View of Structure 5 looking south. View of Structure 6 looking north. View of the southeastern part of Structure 7, looking north. View of the western part of Structure 7, looking northwest. ii INTRODUCTION This collection of photographs documents the standing structures in the Peconic Landing project area. Included are photographs of all the standing structures slated for removal, as well as four structures which will be retained, at least at this time. T. . .-',A( b'¥ ~, ne s[ructures near th/e~outhwestern corner of the property which will be removed are numbered 1 through~4. Structure I is a wooden ruin now mostly obscured by vegetation. See Plate 1. Structures 2, 2A and 3 are frame barns or sheds. See Plates 2, 3 and 4. Structure 4 is another wooden ruin, but in better condition than Structure 1. See Plate 5. To the west of these structures is a metal barn or shed that will be retained. See Plate 6. Brecknock Hall lies to the northeast of the first group of structures. It will be retained as will the frame garage to its north. See Plates 7 and 8. Plate 9 illustrates the greenhouse to the northeast of the garage. There are no plans to remove it at this time. Structures 5 and 6 lie to the northeast of Brecknock Hall. Structure 5 is a two-story frame house that will be removed. See Plate 10. Structure 6 is a frame shed which will be removed. See Plate 11. Structure 7 is a foundation that will be removed. It is obscured from view by vegetation. Plate 12 shows the southeastern end of this concrete foundation. The western part of the foundation holds a corn crib built of metal mesh. Plate 13 shows this portion of Structure 7. Over 200 yards north of Brecknock Hall is a small concrete block water supply pumphouse. It will remain. It was not photographed since it is obviously no more than 25 years old. There is also an obviously modern reinforced concrete foundation considerably northwest of Structure 5, 6 and 7. It will also be removed. Two figures are included showing the locations of the structures photographed and the positions from which the photographs were taken. Figure 1 includes Structures 1 through 4, the metal barn or shed, Brecknock Hall and its frame garage and greenhouse. Figure 2 shows the structures near the southeastern corner of the project area. It includes Structures 5, 6 and 7. 0 8 t ' ' . TO',BE',REMO%4~ Location of Plate Figure 2 Locations of structures near the southeastern corner of the project area, showing locations of Plates 10 through 13. Plate 1 View of the ruins of Structure 1 looking south. Plate 2 View of Structure 2 looking northwest. Plate 3 View of Structure 2A, the frame shed adjacent to Structure 2, looking northwest. Plate 4 View of Structure 3 looking northeast. Plate $ View of the ruins of Structure 4 looking northeast. Plate 6 View of metal building to be retained looking northwest plate T View of BrecknOCk Hall rooking northwest. plate 8 View of frame garage to be retainod looking west, Plate 9 View of the greenhouse looking west. Prate 10 View of Structure 5 looking south. Plate 1 1 View of Structure 6 looking north. Plate 12 View of the southeastern part of Structure 7, looking north. Plate 13 View of the western part of Structure 7, looking northwest. Bernadette Castro Commissioner New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation ~'~ Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau I~ Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-864 Carol A. Farkas Environmental Analyst NYS DEC Region 1 Building 40 SUNY at Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY 11790 Rez JUL 2 $ ZO0O Southold Town Planning Board NYS DOH/NYS DEC 1-4738-018051/00001 Peconic Landing/Brecknock Hall T/Southold, Suffolk Co. 98PR0237 Dear Ms. Farkas: The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) has received and reviewed additional photographic documentation of the former Floyd Estate "Brecknock." Based on this current information and information in our files gathered in connection with an earlier proposal to nominate the estate to the State and National Register of Historic Places, it is the OPRHP opinion that Brecknock Hall and its associated outbuildings and landscaped setting meet the criteria for inclusion in the State and National Registers. In addition, our staff has reviewed and provided comment on Phase 1 and Phase 2 cultural resource survey reports prepared for this project and has concurred with the proposed scope of Phase 3 data recovery at identified sites. A copy of our letter to the project archeologist indicating acceptance of the scope of data recovery and outlining requirements for submission and implementation of a full data recovery plan is attached. In accordance with Section 14.09 of the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law, it is the OPRHP opinion that development of the Peconic Landing at Southold Continuing Care Retirement Community will have No Adverse Impact on historic resources with the condition that an approved Phase 3 data recovery program is completed and that the large barn west of the estate house is retained (see below). Of the buildings within the State and National Register eligible estate complex, the following are considered to be non-contributing to the property's significance for the reasons noted, with reference to the identification numbers and plate numbers from the documentation submitted by Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated and dated February 2000. Demolition or removal of these structures wilt not impact the historic character the "Brecknock" Estate: Struct. 1/Plate 1 -- Wood-framed structure of unknown use, north of large barn. Severe loss of material and design integrity (ruin). Struct. 2/Plate 2 -- Open 3-bay shed; corrugated roof and siding. Apparent modern construction (less than 50 years old). Struct. 2A/PL 3 -- Wood-framed, gable-roofed structure east of structure 2. Loss of material integrity. Struct. 4/Plate 5 -- Wood-framed, gable roofed structure immediately east of large barn. Severe loss of material and design integrity (ruin). Struct. ?/Plate 6 -- Unnumbered, Iow metaJ building west of Structure 1. Less than fifty years old. An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency ~ printed on recycled paper b~, ul, areas Peconic Landing , '~EC 1--4738-018051/000C~ OPRHP 98PR0237 '~ Page 2 July 19, 2000 Struct. 5/Plate 10 -- Abandoned and deteriorated 1 1/2 story residence Probably former caretaker's or tenant's residence. Struct. 6/Plate 11 -- Low equipment shed with corrugated metal roof. Less than fifty years old. Struct. 7/Pis 12~13 -- Collapsed structure with attached wire corn crib. Loss of integrity (ruin). The remaining structures, including Brecknock Hall, its associated garage and greenhouse, and the large wood-framed barn west of the proposed access road are contributing components of the Estate and should be retained and incorporated into the planned development of this property. We note that the large barn (structure 3) is proposed for demolition but that no construction is planned at that location other than the future western access road. The barn appears sound, was designed with considerable attention to amhitectural detail and represents the past agricultural activity associated with a working country estate. In the absence of any information justifying demolition, we recommend retaining the barn. If you have any questions regarding OPRHP review of this project, please contact James Warren at extension 3283 or Douglas Mackay at extension 3291. S?~erely, Ruth L. Pierpont, Director enclosure: 7/18/00 D. Mackay to W. Roberts Copy of structure photos and photo key cc: [---I~ert G. Krassner, Town of Southold w/o encls. Thomas M. Jung, RA, NYS DOH w/o encls. W. Roberts, Greenhouse Consultants w/o encls. RLP:jw D~partment of Health Services .Office of Wastewater Management 631 852-2100 Robert J. Gaffney Suffolk County Executive Clare B. Bradley, M.D., MPH Commissioner PERMIT HealihServicesReference# C., I0 -q'~- 1[ Project Name 19e,.o,,,,u t...~,,..~ The attached plan, when duly signed by a representative of the department, constitutes a permit to construct a water supply and/or a sewage disposal or collection system for the property as depicted. The applicant should take note of any conditions of approval, which may be indicated on the plan or enclosed herein. Construction must conform with applicable standards including "Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other than Single Family Residences." Omissions or lack of detail on the plan do not release the applicant from the responsibility of having the construction done in conformance with applicable standards. The permit (plan) expires three (3) years after the approval date. Any modification which may affect the proposed sewage disposal or water supply systems requires submission of a revised plan and additional fees (if applicable) for reapproval prior to construction. No inspections will be performed by the department on expired permits. Permits may be renewed, extended, transferred, or revised in accordance with the procedures described in Instructions to Renew, Extend, or Transfer an Existing Permit for Other than Single Family Residences (Form WWM-018). It is the applicant's responsibility to call the department in advance to arrange inspections of the sewage disposal and/or water supply facilities prior to backfilling. These include inspections of the sewage collection and disposal systems, water supply system components and piping, and final grading as shown on the approved plans. In certain cases, inspections of the soil excavation may be required to determine the acceptability of the soils for sewage disposal systems. The department must be notified at least 48 hours in advance to schedule an inspection; and excavation inspections must also be confirmed by calling 852-2100 prior to 9:30am, the morning of the inspection. Final approval issued by the Department is necessary prior to the occupancy of new buildings, additions to existing buildings, or for the use of sewage disposal or water supply systems. WWM-016 (Rev.3/15/99) Page 1 of 2 ProjectNamc ~t'~'l~'O~'e ~,,tbr~ HealthServicesRe,~rence# e/O--97-// CONDITIONS FOR OBTAINING FINAL APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTED PROJECT As a condition of this permit to construct, the following items must be completed as a minimum. prior to building occupancy and use of the sewage disposal system or water supply facilities. For further information concerning this, refer to Instructions For Obtaining Final Health Department Approval Of Constructed Projects For Other Than Single Family Residences (Form WWM- 19). [] Excavation Inspection by the Office of Wastewater Management prior to installation of leaching pools to determine acceptability of soils. ( Call 852-2097 ) [] Satisfactory inspection by Office of Wastewater Management of the sewage disposal system (Call 852-2097) [] Satisfactory inspection of the water supply system by: [] Office of Wastewater Management (Call 852-2097 ) [] Office of Water Resources, Water Quality Unit ( Call 853-2250 ) [] Satisfactory inspection by the Office of Pollution Control ( Call 854-2502 ) [] Sewage treatment plant [] Storage tanks [] Other: '~ Four (4) prints of an As-Built plan '~"Tap letter" from water district [] Certification from the licensed sewage disposal system installer [] "S-9 form" from Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) '~ Sewer district approval of sewer line installation (for other than SCDPW districts) [] Well drillers certificate [] Water analysis [] Design Professionals Certification of Constructed Works (form WWM-073) for: [] Sewer lines and sewage collection system [] Retaining walls (approved as part of the sewage disposal system) [] Sewage pump station/valve chamber [] Sub-surface sewage disposal system [] Sewage treatment plant [] Water supply system [] Abandonment of Preexisting sewage disposal system and/or water supply [] Other: '~ Other: WWM-016 (Rev.3/15/99) Page 2 of 2 · I FACiliTY/PROGRAM NUMBER(S) STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTORTION EFFECTIVE DATE November 16r 2000 PERHIT EXPIRATION DATE(S) Under the Environmental Conservation Law November 30, 2005 TYPE OF PERMIT E] New [] Renewal [] Modification [] Permit to Construct [] Permit to Operate [] [] [] [] Article 15, Title 5: Protection of Waters Article 15, Title 15: Water Supply Article 15, Title 15: Water Transport Article 15, Title 15: Long Island Wells Article 15, TitLe 27: WiLd, Scenic and Recreational Rivers [] 6NYCRR 608: Water Quality [] Certification [] Article 17, Titles 7, 8: SPDES [] [] Article 19: Air Pollution Control [] [] Article 23, Title 2?: Mined Land Reclamation [] · Article 24: Freshwater Wet[ands [] [] Article 25: Tidal Wet[ands Article 27, Title 7; 6NYCRR 360: Solid Waste Management Article 27, Title 9; 6NYCRR 373: Hazardous Waste Management Article 34: Coastal Erosion Management Article 36: Floodplain Management Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 27, 37; 6NYCRR 380: Radiation Control PERMIT ISSUED TO U.S. Retirement Communities on behalf of Peconic Landing TELEPHONE NUMBER (610) 627-2330 ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE The Georgetown Building~ 101Chestey Drive~ MedJa¢ PA 19063-1761 CONTACT PERSON FOR PERMITTED ~ORK Thomas C. Wo[pertt P.E.t Young & Youngf 400 Ostrander Avenuef Riverheadt NY NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT/FACILiTY Peconic Lar~ing~ Main Road~ east of Sound Road LOCATION OF PROJECT/FACILITY Greenport COUNTY 11901 TELEPHONE NUMBER (631) 727-2303 I TOWN Suffolk Southotd DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVII~f: WATERCOURSE Long Island Sound NYTM COORDINATES Construct 118 single family cottages, 132 apartment units, 24 unit assisted living center and a skilled care center. The project is beyond the crest of the bluff and therefore out of jurisdiction for Article 25. All work is to be done in accordance with the attached plans stamped NYSDEC approved· By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict con~otiance with the ECL, ail al~oticable regulations, the General Conditions specified (see paRe 2 & 3) and any Special Conditions included as part of this permit. PERMIT ADMINISTRATOR: I ADDRESS George W. Ha~marth (CAF) Bldg. #/*0, SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 A~GN~, R~~/~ DATE · November 16~ 2000 IPage I of 5 N~ORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONeATION NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIGATIONS Item A: Permittee Accepts Legal Responsibility and Agrees to Indemnification The permittee expressly agrees to indemnity and hold harmless the Department of Environmental Conservation of the State of New York, its representatives, employees, agents, and assigns for all claims, suits, actions, damages, and costs of every name and description, arising out of or resulting from the permittee's undertaking of activities or operation and maintenance of the facility or facilities authorized by the permit in compliance or non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. Item B: Permittee's Contractors to Comply with Permit The permittee is responsible for informing its independent contractors, employees, agents and assigns of their responsibility to comply with this permit, including all special conditions while acting as the permittee's agent with respect to the permitted activities, and such persons shall be subject to the same sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee. Item C: Permit*tee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals, lands, easements and rights-of-way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. Item D: No Right to Trespass or Interfere with Riparian Rights This pe~'mit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights, title, or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. GENERAL CONDITIONS General Condition '1: Facility Inspection by the Department The permitted site or facility, including relevant records, is subject to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation (the Depadment) to determine whether the permittee is complying with this permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECL 71-0301 and SAPA 401(3). The permittee shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection to the permit area when requested by the Department. A copy of this permit, including all referenced maps, drawings and special conditions, must be available for inspection by the Department at all times at the project site or facility. Failure to produce a copy of the permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. General Condition 2: Relationship of this Permit to Other Department Orders and Determinations Unless expressly provided for by the Department, issuance of this permit does not modity, supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by the Department or any of the terms, conditions or requirements contained in such order or determination. General Condition 3: Applications for Permit Renewals or Modifications The permittee must submit a separate written application to the Department for renewal, modification or transfer of this permit. Such application must include any forms or supplemental information the Department requires. Any renewal, modification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. The permittee must submit a renewal application at least: a) 180 days before expiration of permits for State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES), Hazardous Waste Management Facilities (HWMF), major Air Pollution Control (APC) and Solid Waste Management Facilities (SWMF); and b) 30 days before expiration of all other permit types. Submission of applications for permit renewal or modification are to be submitted to: NYSDEC Regional Permit Administrator, Region 1, SUNY Bldg #40, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 General Condition 4: Permit Modifications, Suspensions and Revocations by the Department The Department reserves the right to modity, suspend or revoke this permit. The grounds for modification, suspension or revocation include: a) the scope of the permitted activity is exceeded or a violation of any condition of the permit or provisions of the ECL and pertinent regulations is found; b) the permit was obtained by misrepresentation or failure to disclose relevant facts; c) new material information is discovered; or d) environmental conditions, relevant technology, or applicable law or regulation have materially changed since the permit was issued. DEC PERMITNUMBER I PAGE 2 OF 5 1-4738-01805/00001 I N~ORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CON~_ ATION ADDITIONAL GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ARTICLES 15 (TITLE 5), 24, 25, 34 AND 6NYCRR PART 608 ( FRESHWATER WETLANDS ) 10. If future operations by the State of New York require an alteration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural resoumes of the State, the owner may be ordered by the Department to remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused thereby without expense to the State, and if, upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other modification of the watemourse hereby authorized shall not be completed, the owners, shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and man nar as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation, or for other purposes, and no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. Granting of this permit does not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of obtaining any other permission, consent or approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard, New York State Office of General Services or local government which may be required. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project. Any material dredged in the conduct of the work herein permitted shall be removed evenly, without leaving large refuse piles, ridges across the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep holes that may have a tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of a waterway. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work herein authorized. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the project hereby authorized has not been completed, the applicant shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. If granted under 6NYCRR Part 608, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation hereby certifies that the subject project will not contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards under Sections 301,302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217) provided that alt of the conditions listed herein are met. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifying that they are fully aware of and understand all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion of project, the bottom portion of the form must also be signed and returned, along with photographs of the completed work and, if required, a survey. All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as part of the permit application. Such approved plans were prepared by Thomas C. Wolpert on September 6, 2000 DEC PERMIT NUMBER 1~,738-01805/00001 PAGE 3 OF 5 SPECIAL CONDITIONS I. Any work, disturbance, and storage of construction materials shall be confined to upland areas greater than 100 feet landward of the wetland boundary. 2. Heavy equipment, including bulldozers, backhoes, payloaders, etc., shall not be operated in the wetland. 3. A snow fence or other temporary project-limiting fence shall be erected prior to the commencement of any permitted activities along the upland edge of the designated buffer area in order to prevent the inadvertent intrusion of equipment into the protected area. The fence shall be maintained until project completion. 4. Pdor to commencement of any construction activities, a continuous line of silt screen (maximum opening size of U.S. Sieve # 20) shall be staked along the upslope or project side of the fence. The screen shall be maintained, repaired and replaced as often as necessary to ensure proper function, until all disturbed areas are permanently vegetated. Sediments trapped by the screen shall be removed to an approved upland location before the screen is removed. 5. There shall be no discharge of runoff or other effluent on, in or down the bluff face or onto the beach. 6. Any demolition debris, excess construction materials, and/or excess excavated materials shall be immediately and completely disposed of on an approved upland site more than 100 feet from any rag ulated freshwater wetland. These materials shall be suitably stabilized so as not to re-enter any water body, wetland, or wetland adjacent area. 7. Excavated materials and/or fill materials shall be stockpiled more than 100 feet landward of the wetland or water body and shall be contained by strew bales or silt fencing to prevent erosion. 8. All fill shall consist of clean soil, sand and/or gravel that is free of the following substances: asphalt, slag, fiyash, broken concrete, demolition debris, garbage, household refuse, tires, woody materials including tree or landscape debris, and metal objects. The introduction of materials toxic to aquatic life is expressly prohibited. 9. During the grading or sloping operation, soil shall not be placed in or graded toward the wetland. 10. All equipment and machinery shall be stored and safely contained greater than 100 feet landward of the regulated wetland or water body at the end of each work day. This will serve to avoid the inadvertent leakage of deleterious substances into the regulated area. Fuel or other chemical storage tanks shall be contained and located at all times in an area greater than 100 feet landward of the regulated wetland or water body, If the above requirement cannot be met by the permittee, then the storage areas must be designed to completely contain any and all potential leakage. Such a containment system must be approved by NYSDEC staff prior to equipment, machinery or tank storage within 100 feet of the regulated wetland or water body. 11. All areas of soil disturbance resulting from this project shall be seeded with an appropriate perennial grass, and mulched with straw immediately upon completion of the project, within two (2) days of final grading, or by the expiration ofthepermit, whichever is first. Mulch shall be maintained until a suitable vegetative cover is established. Ifseeding is impracticable due to the time of year, a temporary mulch shall be applied and final seeding shall be performed as soon as weather conditions favor germination and growth. 12. Suitable vegetative cover is defined as a minimum of 85% area vegetative cover with contiguous unvegetated areas no larger than 1 square foot in size. I I DEC PERMITNUMBER ~ ~ PAGE 4 OF 5 1-4738-0'1805/0000'1 I I N,i~YO R K STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENV RONMENTAL CO~'~/ATION SPECIAL CONDITIONS '13. The permittee shall incorporate the following language as a notice covenant to the deed: "Regulated freshwater wetlands associated with GP-11 are located on the properties of U.S. Retirement Communities /Peconic Landing at Southold and their heirs, assigns or successors. This property is subject to the provisions of Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) Article 24, and the conduct of regulated activities may occur only pursuant to ECL Article 24 if prior approval is given by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) or its successor(s). Regulated activities include, but are not limited to clearing of vegetation; application of chemicals; excavation; grading and filling; and erection of any structure(s)." This deed covenant shall be recorded with the Clerk of Suffolk County within 90 days of the issuance of this permit. A copy of the covenanted deed or other acceptable proof of record, along with the number assigned to this permit, shall be sent within one calendar year of the issuance of this permit to: NYSDEC, Regional Manager Bureau of Habitat, SUNY Building 40, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356. 14. There shall be no disturbance seaward of the topographic crest of any bluff along Long Island Sound or the pond adjacent to Long Island Sound. DEC PERMIT NUMBER I IPAGE 5 OF ~ 1-4738-01805/00001 002 · To: From: Date: Pages: Subject: Carol A. Farkas NYS Dept. Of tgnvironmental Conservation Barry D. Greenhouse July 24, 2000 3, including this page Pcconic Landing, Town of $outhold NYSDEC No. 1.473841180,5/00001 OPRHP No. 98PR0237 We have today received final approval of the New York State Office of Parks, Re~eafion and Historic Preservation, o£ the data recovery plans for the Pecooic Landing project. A copy of that letter follows. This now concludes all aspects of thc archaeological process. Thc OPRHP has concluded there are no fi.u-ther archaeological concerns at this time, as the July 18, lcttc~ from Douglas P. Mackcy indicates. It has approved the data recovery plans submitted by our firm: and has recommended that that work be implemented as appropriate to the project development, at any time prior to initiating construction in those two areas. There arc no futthtx archaeological restrictions to consttuction in any other areas of the project. Although Stage 3 data recovery fiddwork can begin at *[ny time, it need not begin at rhi, dn~e. 'the only axchaeological stipulation is that data recovery fi~dwork be completed befoze constmcrion in those axeas only. There are no further an:haeological restrictions to construction in any other pomons of the proposed development. Please feel free to call me ffyou have any questions. Cotpotat~ Northeast Re, on: 6110 River Cha~e Circle '40 Exclwa~ge Place, 13'h floor .~tlln1~ ~ ~ Nt~,' ¥ork~ New York 10005 Phone: (7/0) 988-9091 Phone: (212) 514-9520 Fax: {770) 988-9093 Fax: (212) 480-9080 · 15:08 FAX 770~9083 Greemhouse a~lan~a ~ John Dussllng ~001 To.' Company: From: Date: Pages: Subject: John F. Dussling US Relltcmerit Communities Barry D. Greenhouse lu y ooo 3, includ;ng this page Peconic Landing Data Recoveries We h~tve today received f~a2 appmvol of the data recovery pla~s. A copy of the fax from Doug Mackey of OPRHP follows. Cot'porate: 6110 Rivet C~-~e Circle ?~oa~ ~) ~ F~: ~0) 9~3 II Northeast Re, on: 40 Exch,-mge Place, 13'h New York, New York 10005 Phone: (212) 514-9.520 Fax: (2L2) 480-0080 (t7/24/00 ~0N 15:05 FAX 770985909~ J~1-24--00 -t~:l~ GRE~OU~ ~002 New York State Office of Pecka, Recreation and Historic Preserve[Ion Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Peelales Island, PO Box 189, Waterford. New' Yo~ 12188-0169 518-237- 8643 July 18. 20(.X} O,:ar Mr. Robcrl.~. DEC' Scope of Work. AddeMum - Stage 3 Peeonic Landing Prnjoct Tr)wn ,,f $0~thOId, Suffolk County 98PR0~7 Thank you for responding to thc cm4icr <omm~,t$ of thc Office of Pa[k% Rccrcaliun and fils[eric Prc.~crva6on (OPRHI)) on [he propoae.~ ~,twk .¢.c~n~ for thc above .ccfcrcnc~l i)TO.~d. OPI~HP staff have review, cd ibc additional in refineries aJ~ mcommcnds [hat t~e complete $c(~c kc implemented ~1! this dine. Up, r) ~-umplOion of the field we[lc detailed i, Ihi$ complete scope. ()PR}fl:' v, ill consider thc archaeological field isauc$ ¢oraplcte and no ad~lltlanal archaeological tleld i)wes6galk~n will bc recommended. Complccinn of ibc entire da~ recovay work scope, up iu and including pr,Muccion u£ the lc, e~pie.$ of ~he final report for disseminaticm will he r. xes~ax7, however. OPRHP ,~'ill provide clearance ~"~r arcl~mlogical cornponcm of thc project review once all end uf field letter for thc d,[~a recovery work has been accel)lcd. ORP]'{~ looks lhnvard ~.'~ ~mCeivlng the leper[ det,~iling your findings. OPRIlP ccmtlnuc$ tO reqt~ thax y,.',u c,,mpIdc p~jcc[~. St<h a p]an xhoold incise all of (S~d~ 4.2). and ~m~d fl~ ~ of A~ha~k~ical D,,cts~ntadon (48 ~ ~7~737L This info~tm6on is S~Z~ I~y Ibc A&'isocy C,)u~it for Iliat('aic Pa:~:~alion ia iu "~c()m~nd~ Appeal, f(~ C~ms~ion o. Rccove~ of The plan shuuld Thc re.cults of pre~.h).~ trow;al'ch cclcvam Io thc projcct; ami i mp~ncc: lilt n~tht~s m ~ u~d in a~i~cL ~la. u~ ~ ~ ~C~nt; 07/24/00 MON 15:08 FAX 7709889093 Greenhouse aclaura ~ John Dussllng ~]003 Jul-24-O0 12:].9 GR~[tOUSE new york 2).~E~O 9080 P,~ 2 I{g) Ih( curalion ct' rccovcrexl mal~*~iols ;md r~colxl~ resulllng I'ro~ [he d,,~a rccov¢.ry in accordance wi[h 36 (~-'R ~ ?9 {e0ccel~ in ~hc ca.~e Of un~xpeclcd d~scovcrlc~ thai muy ~'h) pn~coJur¢$ f~r cval~a[Jn§ and l. rcafin~ di.~:overies of unexr~:~tcd remain~ or newly i~nti[J~ histOaiC properties du~ng Ihe course or' the proj~, including necessary cunsuit~tion will, nthc~ ~nics PF:paring plans tl~t follow ra~ese guid~lia¢'s should I~lp ~o CXl~-~lhc fulurc projects. Plea~ contact mc at (518) 2:~7-86~3 it' you hax,~.: any qu~tions r o.c~.~rdin.~ thc archaculugic'~ this review. Offi,;a uf Purk~. R~l~tlis,n and I lisl~i¢ Pre~ervaciun/Fietd ..'~rvic~ ~ureau (OPKHP} 07/10/00 WON 16:47 FAX 7709889093 Greenhouse atlanta ~ John Dussllng ~001 To: John F. Dusaling Company: US Retirement Comm,m~tics From: Barry D. Greenhouse ~e Date: July 10, 2000 Pages: 5, including this page Subject: Peconic Landing Data Recoveries Our reply to Doug Mackey of OPRHP follows. Will Roberts spoke with Doug to discuss his concerns. He agreed to accept our reply m fulfillment of his June 9, letter. There a~e no funtaez requirements at this time. However, data recovery fieldwotk must be completed to the satisfaction of OPR_HP prior to construction related activities m either of the two archaeologically sensitive areas. We will provide revised budgets for Stage 3 data recovery fieldwotk closer to the time you want to schedule that work. We look forward to receiving yo~ $1,000 payment for services needed to prepare and coordinate the data recovery plans. Feel free to give me a call if you have any questions. Corporate: Northeast Re,on: 6110 River Cha~e Circle 40 Exchange Place, 13~ floor Atlanta, C, eorg/a ~10328 New York, New York 10005 Phone: (770) 988-9091 Phone: (212) 514-9520 Fmc (770) 988-9093 Fax: (212) 480-9080 07/3_0/00 I/0N 3_6:47 FAX 770/)88/)0/)3 Greenhouse atlanta -,-,-, Joim l)us$±ln,~ ~J0ol .3u'[-10-OO 15:o6. ~R~OUISI~ n-- york 212{~O 9080 P.O1 10 July 2000 Douglas F. Mackey Historic Preservatio~ Field Services Bureau N.¥.$. Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation Peebles Island, P.o,Box 789 Waterford, New York 12188-0189 RE: 98~0237 Dear Doug: This letter is being sent in reply to your letter of 9 June 2000. That letter raised five points regarding our Scope-of-Work for Stage 3 Data Recovery Excavations at the two prehistoric sites found within the Peconi¢ Landing project area. My ~eply addresses the five points in the same order. Please see figures A and B with this letter for maps showing the sited, their boundaries, and the various positive and negative ~e~ts in the vicinity. I have s~o~rn in red the proposed locations of seven excava- tion units for each site. Three additional units ~ill be added for each site based on the results of the~e firs= seven un/ts- We will he pleased tO refe-~ence Peconic Landing Pre- historic Site #~ as A]O3]D.001294 and Peconic Landing Prehistoric Site 9! as A10310.00129~ in our ~tage 3 report. We have previously worked with Anagnostic Agelarakis of Adelphi U~iv~rsity as a physical anthropologist. we plan on using his services on this project should a physical anthropologist be required. ~f he is not available, then he should be able to supply a replace- ment. The radiocarbon testing ~lll be done by Beta Analytic, Inc. of cora~ Gables, Florida. Thu $outhold lndlmn Museum of Bayvle~ Road, Southold has expressed interest in obtaining the collections from this project. In telephone conversations they have agreed to be the repository for the collections. 07/10/00 MON 16:47 FA~ 7709889092 Jul- 10-00 16:06 P_02 We agree to submit one COpy of OUr draft Stage 3 report to the Hiztoric Preservation FieLd Services Bureau for review. ~pon acceptance of the final report, ww agree supply an additional ten copies for distribution to repositories around New York State. Both the draft and flhal copies will include e%ther original photo- graphs or high quality photostatic ~eproductio~s. We hope that this submission has satisfactorily addressed the five points raised in yOur letter of 9 June 2000. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (212] 514-9520. we look forward to receiving yoctr approval to be~in this work. Sincerely, /.; ..... .. William 1. ~oberts Iv Chief Archaeologist cc: Barry D. G~eenhouse 07/10/00 ,~ION 16:47 FAX 7709889093 Jul- IO-OO 1S:O7 GRKE~Ug~E york 212 NEW FRAME: GAZEBO Fiqure A -'~0 I O0 150 leal I I,', I Location of prehistoric site #1 within the northeastern part of the project area. K~Y I Positive Test 07/10/00 MON 16:48 FAX 7709889003 Jul-lO-O0 15:07 GREE US~E PARKING.AREA N( IrACiLIl~f PARK!Ig(~--+2 CARS) 0 5~0 I O0 I~iO lea! , I ' I KEY · Positive Test · Negative Test Figure B Location of prehistoric site ~2 withi~ the 07/05/00 WED 17:10 FM/, 7709889093 Greenhouse a~lanta John Dussllng New York State Office of Parke, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Peebies Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New Ycr~ 12188-0189 518-237-8643 ~'unc 9, 2000 William Roberts Greenhouse Consultants 4.0 Exchange Place Thirteenth Floor, New York, NY 10005 002 Dear I01r. Roberts, RE: DEC Scope of'Work, Stage 3 Peconic Landing Project Town of Southolg. Suffolk County 98PR0237 Thank you for requesting the comments of the Office of Parks RecreatiOn and Historic PreservaiiOn (0PRHP) on the proposed work scope for the above r~femnced project. OPP, HP staff have reviewed your scope of work and offers the following commeIlts. {~ The scope of work is generally acceptable and should be incorpommd into a formal Data Retrieval Plan with th~ following nlodifications: 1. A map showing the location of the sites, their boundaries, and proposed testing areas should be included. 2. OPRHP site numbers should be referenced for each site (Site numbers for this project are A10310.001294 and A10310_001295) Although the work scope indicates who some specialists will be for some spocial services (i.e. flotation, lithic analysis, faunal analysis) a data retrieval plan should included all specialists thai may be needed. This is especially gue for a physical anthropologlsl, as a need for such services is likely to come at a critical time in project scheduling. Please contact and identify who will be utilized as a physical anthropologist and which radiocarbon lab will be used should samples be recovered. Curation of material is an integral pag of any dam recovery project. The final Data Recovery Plan should identify what institution will serve as a repository for the final collection. OPRHP understands that final arrangements with an institution may not be determined until the final collection is completed, however, you should be able to provide documentation that acceptable institutions have been contacted and expressed an interest in accepting the t~mal collection. An Equm Opportunity/Affirmative Action 07/05/00 WED 17:10 FAX 7709889093 Creenhouse atlanta ~ Joh~l D~ssllng William Roberts. Greenhouse Consulting Page 2 RE: Phase I Archaeological investigations, Valctutti Prope~'y, Town of Paladne. Montgomery County 00PR1242 003 For d.ala recovery investigations one copy of the final report, bound and with original photos or high quality reproductions, should be submitted tO OPRI-[P for review. Upon acceptance of ~¢ final repo~ 10 copies should be provided to OPRHP for ' distribution to repositories around the statn, This should be written into your Data Recovery Plan. Pleas~ contact me at (518) 23%8643 if you have any questions Sincerely, Douglas P. Mackey Historic Preservation Program A~alyst Azchaeology ~Cc: Barry Greenhouse O~c~ of Parks. R~c'reation and Historic Pres~a'vation/Field S~rvice$ Bureau (OPRHP) $~ate Hi~toric Preservation Of[ic~ (SHPO) 05t19100 $~ 2? 99 09:51a Yo & Youn~ New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York l 1790-2356 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us John P, CabS{ Commissioner September 24, 1999 Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY ! 1901. RE: NYSDEC No. 1-4738-01805/00001 OPRHP No. 98PR0237 Dear Mr. Wolpert: The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) has reviewed the Archeology Reports for the Peconic Landing Project and has the following comments: Based on the review, it has been determined that Prehistoric Sites/ti and #2 meet the criteria for listing in the State and National Registers of Historic Places. The OPRHP recommends avoidance of these archeological sites. Submission of an acceptable avoidance plan, including protection measures, implementing/monitoring procedures, and redesign of the project (if necessary) should be submitted for OPRFIP review before e~p. str~_C_t, ipn_b__e, gins. __ : ~C;-~;ih;s; ~teTi;-~;: ;~s~I~i'o;RHP rec°mmends Stage 3 Data Rec°veryexcavations t° be ~ d. An appropriate Stage 3 Data Recovery plan should be developed and submitted for OPRI-IP review ~re exc.~avation begins, j/ In addition, the previously requested photographic survey of existing structures within the project area has not been submitted for review by OPRI-IP. The full evaluation of potential impacts of this project cannot be made until all information is available for review. Please provide additional information pursuant to OPRHP's request and I will forward your response to thcm. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Robert Kuhn at 518-23'7-8643, ext 3255. Sincerely, ~ ~ Carol A. Environmental Analyst CAF:cs STAGE 3 SCOPE-OF-WORK PREHISTORIC SITES 1 AND 2, PECONIC LANDING TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY 98PR0257 This document presents Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated's scope-of-work for Stage 3 Amhaeological Data Recovery Excavations at Peconic Landing1 Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. Two areas of prehistoric use were found during the Stage 1B/2 survey of this project. They were labeled Site 1 and Site 2. Both were determined eligible for the New York State and National Registers of Historic Places. Site #1 is situated on high ground west of the pond in the northwestern section of the project area. It overlooks Long Island Sound. Site #2 is situated on high ground southwest of a wet depression, within the central section of the project area. Site #1 is approximately 4,500 square feet in size. Fourteen shovel tests and two excavation units (3 feet by 3 feet) produced 805 prehistoric artifacts. Seven hundred thirty-nine of these came from two adjacent excavation units. All the artifacts are lithics. No diagnostic artifacts were found within Site #1. No features were identified at this location, but there were artifacts from the subsoil (Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated 1998:15, Appendix 2). Site #2 is approximately 4,200 square feet in size. Eleven shovel tests and two excavation units (3 feet by 3 feet) produced 166 artifacts. Excavation U nit 4 produced 119 artifacts and Excavation Unit3 produced 30 artifacts. No diagnostic artifacts were found within Site#2. No features were identified, but some artifacts were recovered from the subsoil (GCl 1999:15-16). The only diagnostic prehistoric artifact recovered from the Peconic Landing project was not found on either of the two sites. A complete Rossville projectile point was recovered from the second layer of Shovel Test 617. This location is over 200 feet southwest of Site #1. The primary date range for these points includes the Early and Middle Woodland periods. Neither site produced any diagnostic artifacts or features. It is most important that dating evidence for both sites be found, either in the form of diagnostic artifacts or samples for radiocarbon dating. With dating evidence these two sites would be able to add much more to our knowledge of local and regional prehistory. The finding of features in Sites 1 and 2 would also greatly increase their potential to add to our knowledge of local and regional prehistory. Therefore our efforts during the Stage 3 work will concentrate on finding diagnostic artifacts and features. Scope-of-Work, Peconic Landing Town ~ Southold, Suffolk Coun~ 98PR0237 May16,2000 Page 2 The search for diagnostic artifacts will consist of the manual excavation of 250 square feet in each of the two sites. Ten formal excavation units, each 5 feet by 5 feet, will be completed in each site. These units will also serve to search for features. This search will also utilize the mechanical scraping of a larger area within each site. The crew will then manually investigate all soil anomalies found. If features are found, they could contain ceramics, lithics, food remains, and ceremonial objects. If bones and plant remains such as seeds are recovered, it may be possible to ascertain which seasons these sites were used. Research Issues 1. Since no dating evidence has been recovered from either Site 1 and Site 2, the most important research question is the date of occupation for the sites. Secondly, were the occupations concurrent? Sites 1 and 2 have produced evidence of the manufacture of stone tools. Was stone tool manufacturing the primary activity engaged upon at these locations, or were they also used for other purposes? Were the occupations of Sites 1 and 2 year-round or seasonal. If the sites were seasonal, were Sites 1 and 2 used at the same or different times of the year. Based on the assumption of the recovery of dating evidence, how did Sites 1 and 2 fit into the settlement patterns of their respective cultural period(s)? What is the spatial distribution of artifacts and features over the landscape? How does Site 1 compare with Site 2? How do these sites compare with local and regional densities, and distribution over time and space? Field Methodology In order to answer the research questions proposed for this data recovery, the field work will concentrate on the exposure of large areas to search for possible features. We anticipate using a crew of four for three months. There will be three primary tasks or phases. The first task to be accomplished will be the excavation of ten excavations units, five by five feet, within both sites. These will begin at the surface and proceed until 0.5 feet of stedle subsoil is removed, unless stopped by obstacles. All soils recovered during the excavation will be screened through t/,-inch mesh to recover artifacts. Stratigraphy will be recorded in plan and section and described on standardized provenance forms, copies of which will be Scope-of-Work, Peconic Landing Town of Southold, Suffolk Coun~ 98PR0237 May16,2000 Page 3 included with the field testing report. Soils will be described by reference to Munsell colors and identified as to texture, inclusions, etc. All units will be backfilled after they are recorded. Extra effort for up to two more units has been included in case one or more of the first units recover evidence of a feature. This strategy will allow expansion of the excavation to recover the entire feature. The second task will be the large area exposure. This will utilize a backhoe or similar machine with a fiat blade to mechanically remove the soil within one transect in each site down to the base of the plowzone. This procedure will be followed by the crew using fiat shovels to scrape the area. The locations of any possible features will then be mapped. The third task will be the excavation of any features found during the scraping. Unless the features appear to be postmolds, either one-quarter or one-half of each will be excavated to determine if they are cultural and prehistoric in date. Cross-sections and plans of all prehistoric features will then be drawn, and the remaining portion of the feature excavated. Samples for radiocarbon dating and flotation will be taken from the features as appropriate. This strategy will be followed up to a maximum of ten features. If the number of features discovered exceeds ten, then only one-quarter or one-half of any particular feature will be excavated. The remaining portions of features would then be excavated as time allows until we reach our maximum level of effort. If ten or fewer features are found, we anticipate excavating 100 percent of them. If more than ten features are found, we may need to limit feature excavation to a maximum of 50 percent of each so that all can be sampled. All postmolds discovered will be mapped. If only a small number of postmolds are found, all will be cross-sectioned. If many are found, then the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation will be consulted to determine which ones will be cross-sectioned. We propose to mechanically clear one rectangular area, in each site, approximately 120 feet by 30 feet, minus those portions that will have been manually excavated. If any features are found on the edges of this area, the area will be enlarged to recover the remainder of the feature. Should human remains be discovered during the fieldwork, then work will cease on that particular location and both the coroner and the Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau will be contacted. Work on the burial(s) will not commence until appropriate arrangements have been made. A physical anthropologist will be contacted to examine the remains should this be deemed advisable by the Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau. The Bureau will make contact with local Native American groups should the remains be determined to Scope-of-Work, Peconic Landing Town of Southold, Suffolk County 98PR0237 May 16, 2000 Page 4 be Native American. Once all appropriate arrangements have been made, then excavation of the burial(s) will recommence. Once work has been completed within Sites 1 and 2, an end-of-fieldwork letter will be written and submitted to the Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau for review. This letter should allow construction activities to proceed in that location. Artifact Processinq and Analysis Procedures for artifact processing and basic stabilization will be established and carried out under the supervision of the Laboratory Director. Processing and analysis of the finds will take place at the Greenhouse Laboratory at 40 Exchange Place in Manhattan. Principles of object conservation will be applied throughout the processing, both in the field, if necessary, and the Greenhouse laboratory, at each of the following stages: 1 ) recovery in the field using inert waterproof collection materials; 2) emergency removal techniques if/as required; 3) cleaning/stabilization procedures in the laboratory; 4) infield or laboraton/ consolidation as necessary; 5) catalog/inventory recording to provide quantified artifact inventories; and finally, 6) accessible storage techniques using museum quality materials. Artifacts recovered shall be appropriately conserved, curated, and prepared for placement in a repository according to Federal guidelines (36CFR79). Although a large number of artifacts are not expected from this excavation, should artifacts be recovered which appear to be in danger of deterioration, an artifact conservator will be consulted to determine appropriate treatments for their stabilization. Analysis of the data recorded during the excavation and of the artifacts recovered will then proceed. The types of analysis performed will depend upon the variety and amounts of artifacts and samples recovered, as well as the data recorded in the field. It will include analysis of all diagnostic artifacts recovered; study of the debitage from stone tool working activities; and flotation, faunal and floral analyses if sufficient samples are recovered, and radiocarbon dating of selected features should sufficient carbon be recovered. Eugene Boesch will perform the ceramic analysis should ceramics be found. Processing and analysis of flotation samples will be conducted by William Sandy. Lithic analysis will be performed by our Laboratory Director, Paula Crowley. Should animal bones be recovered, then a faunal analyst will be found to analyze these samples. Should human remains be recovered, then a physical anthropologist will be found to analyze them, Should suitable samples be recovered, radiocarbon testing will be done by an outside laboratory. These various analyzes will compare the data from this site with that from other sites. Scope-of-Work, Peconic Landing Town of Southold, Suffolk County 98PR0237 May 16, 2000 Page 5 Final Report Following completion of the various analyses, a report will be prepared to meet the standards of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. This report will document the procedures and results of the excavations and analyses. A full catalog of artifacts recovered will be included. The results will include answering the various research questions should this prove possible. The completed report will then be submitted to the Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau for their review. References Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated 1998 Stage ~ Archaeological survey of the Continuing Care Retirement Community, Peoonic Landing at Southold, Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. New York, New York: Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated. 1999 Additional Stage 1B/2 Archaeological Survey of the Continuing Care Retirement Community, Peconic Landing at Southold, Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. New York, New York: Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated. PHOTOGRAPHS OF STANDING STRUCTURES PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD GREENPORT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK prepared for: Young and Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 prepared by: Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated 40 Exchange Place, 13th Floor New York, New York 10005 February 2000 Figure 1 Figure 2 LIST OF FIGURES Locations of structures near the southwestern corner of the project area, showing locations of Plates 1 through 9. Locations of structures near the southeastern corner of the project area, showing locations of Plates 10 through 13. Plate 1 Plate 2 Plate 3 Plate 4 Plate 5 Plate 6 Plate 7 Plate 8 Plate 9 Plate 10 Plate 1 1 Plate 12 Plate 13 LIST OF PLATES View of the ruins of Structure 1 looking south. View of Structure 2 looking northwest. View of Structure 2A, the frame shed adjacent to Structure 2, looking northwest. View of Structure 3 looking northeast. View of the ruins of Structure 4 looking northeast. View of metal building to be retained looking northwest. View of Brecknock Hall looking northwest. View of frame garage to be retained looking west. View of the greenhouse looking west. View of Structure 5 looking south. View of Structure 6 looking north. View of the southeastern part of Structure 7, looking north. View of the western part of Structure 7, looking northwest. INTRODUCTION This collection of photographs documents the standing structures in the Peconic Landing project area. Included are photographs of ail the standing structures slated for removal, as well as four structures which will be retained, at least at this time. ...,^l 0'~ .3 The structures near th~.,~outhwestern corner of the property which will be removed are numbered I through~4. Structure 1 is a wooden ruin now mostly obscured by vegetation. See Plate 1. Structures 2, 2A and 3 are frame barns or sheds. See Plates 2, 3 and 4. Structure 4 is another wooden ruin, but in better condition than Structure 1. See Plate 5. To the west of these structures is a metal barn or shed that will be retained. See Plate 6. Brecknock Hall lies to the northeast of the first group of structures. It will be retained as will the frame garage to its north. See Plates 7 and 8. Plate 9 illustrates the greenhouse to the northeast of the garage. There are no plans to remove it at this time. Structures 5 and 6 lie to the northeast of Brecknock Hall. Structure 5 is a two-story frame house that will be removed. See Plate 10, Structure 6 is a frame shed which will be removed. See Plate 11. Structure 7 is a foundation that will be removed. It is obscured from view by vegetation. Plate 12 shows the southeastern end of this concrete foundation, The western part of the foundation holds a corn crib built of metal mesh. Plate 13 shows this portion of Structure 7. Over 200 yards north of Brecknock Hall is a small concrete block water supply pumphouse. It will remain. It was not photographed since it is obviously no more than 25 years old. There is also an obviously modern reinforced concrete foundation considerably northwest of Structure 5, 6 and 7. It will also be removed. Two figures are included shoWing the locations of the structures photographed and the positions from which the photographs were taken. Figure 1 includes Structures 1 through 4, the metal barn or shed, Brecknock Hall and its frame garage and greenhouse, Figure 2 shows the structures near the southeastern corner of the project area. It includes Structures 5, 6 and 7. 0 0 "..~ ',~ TO',BE",REMO'vEC I1~ Location of Plate ' I I ' Figure 2 Locations of structures near the southeastern corner of the project area, showing ,locations of Plates 10 through 13. Plate 1 View of the ruins of Structure 1 looking south. F~late 2 View of Structure 2 looking northwest, Flare 3 View of Structure 2A, the frame shed adjacent to Structure 2, looking northwest. Plate 4 View of Structure 3 looking northeast. Plate 5 View of the ruins of Structure 4 looking northeast. Plate 6 View of metal building to be retained looking northwest Plate 7 View of Brecknock Hall looking northwest, Plate 8 View of frame garage to be retained looking west, Plate 9 View of the greenhouse looking west. PJate 10 View of Structure 5 looking south. Plate 11 View of Structure 6 looking north. Plate 12 View of the southeastern part of Structure 7, looking north. Plate 13 View of the western part of Structure 7, looking northwest. PLANNING BOARD MEMB~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMER8 KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITGHIE LAT~AM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hail, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-3136 Telephone (631) 765~1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 15, 2000 Terence G. Lewis, Sr. U.S. Retirement Communities 101 Chesley Dr. Media, PA 19063-1761 Re:Proposed site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM # 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lewis: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 14, 2000. BE IT RESOLVED that the. Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional six month extension of conditional approval from February 28, 2000 to August 28, 2000. Conditional final approval was granted on August 31, 1998. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, f Chairman USRetirement Communities Media. PA February 9, 2000 Ms. Valerie Scopaz Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Valerie: This note is to thank you and Bob for placing our request for an extension to our conditional site plan approval for the Peconic Landing project on the Planning Board meeting agenda. Of the few conditions that remain to be fulfilled, before we can get final approval, the most important one, and the one that would allow the DEC to give us final approval, is the Suffolk County Department of Health approval. As you may recall, the SCDOH would not accept the 1988 "Will Serve" letter that the property had for sewer service from the Village of Greenport. This required us to enter into new sewer service contract negotiations with Greenport. We now have a draft contract agreed to by both sides, which we hope can be executed after the Peconic Landing board meeting on February 17, 2000. These negotiations and the resulting contract have been very expensive and time consuming for us. The cost of the sewer contract has pushed the project to the very edge of financial viability. I'm glad it is now complete and ready for signature. Our archeological requirements are complete, the last piece being the photo study of the building, has been sent to the New York State Department of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation and we have received their approval pending receipt of those photos. We expect the Department of Transportation's approval for road work in the next couple of weeks. Thanks again for your help and understanding. Sincerely, John F. Dussling ~ Vv~ Pice resident - Development JFD/cac CC: Avery Rockefeller Bill Thompson Jay Woolford Valeri¢Scopaz CRAIG SIRACUSA, F~E. R EGIOh~AL DIRECTOR November 5, 1999 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Young and Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 STATE OF NEW York DEPARTMENT OF Transportation VETerans MEMOrial HighWaY HAUPPaUgE, N.Y. 11788 ....... ~g~'~l~J~l~ePh H. BOARDmAN Your June 15, 1999 Resubmlssion Peconic Landing at Southold Route 25 Greenport Our Case No. 97-263P Dear Mr. Wolpert: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to issuing a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. Add stationing or intersection reference to establish a point ofbegiuning and ending for new curb, pavement and new pavement markings. 2. Add typical width to denote width of new pavement, shoulder, edgeline and sidewalk offset. 3. NYSDOT item numbers are required for pavement marking removal, tack coat, cold milling, saw cutting, asphalt pavement, survey and stake out, embankment in place, topsoil, tarf establishment, altering drainage structure top slab, relocating drainage grating, temporary timber sheet piting, tunch and culvet excavation, backfill, traffic control devices, raise and reset utility manhole frame and lid, fire hydrant relocation and water main offset. 4. Add Type 5 sidewalk ramp at entrance crossing. 5. Show Type A curb height, width and skewbark on detail. 6. Show edge of shoulder treatment on south side of Route 25. 7. Show non-varying cross slope of new pavement detail depicting any point of transition on the plans. Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. November 5, 1999 Page 2 7. Show non-varying cross slope of new pavement detail depicting any point of transition on the plans. 8. Show how new work will transition to adjacent property. 9. When curb is installed at the low point of the road two basins are required. On or at the low point and on or at the point where the gutter grade is 0.2 feet higher than the low point the additional basin need only be a catch basin piped to the existing structure. 10. Show all traffic signs on an existing condition drawing. 11. include a detail of cross slope of new pavement at point of transition. 12. Show invert elevations and drainage table for drainage structures. 13. Add double yellow barrier lines at driveway. 14. Show right turn only hatched island at west driveway. 15. Remove "No Left Turn" sign and install a "Right Turn Only" sign on the northwest comer of the west driveway. 16. Install a "No Left Turn" sign on the northeast comer of the west driveway facing west. 17. Remove the "No Left turn" sign on the south side of Route 25 facing north and install it 60 feet west facing west. 18. Show all utility poles and any conflict with proposed improvements. 19. Revise Maintenance m~d Protection of Traffic plan. to show the lane shift scheme with 11 foot travel lane maintained at all times. 20. The existing bicycle route must be maintained. The following items must be addressed. 1. Install bicycle warning signs (yellow diamond) at driveway exits to alter motorists of approaching bikeway. 2. Relocate all existing Bike Ronte signs to snow storage areas. 3. How will bikeway traffic be protected and maintained during construction? At a minimum deploy orange shared-roadway sign configuration in construction work zone. 4. Relocated curb inlet (#I) infringes on diminished westbound bicycle space. Bicyclists will occupy travel lane to avoid structure, sediment, water and debris collected along curb line. Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. November 5, 1999 Page 3 5. Left turn storage lane and associated barrier and hatch lines displace existing bikeway shoulder in vicinity of west driveway. Five foot minimum shoulder should be maintained for continuity and safety of bikeway. Consider relocating curb and basin (see comment 4) north to preserve bikeway. 6. Sidewalk area on north side may provide undesirable operation of bicycles, if shoulder space is lost. Does sidewalk provide any connection to internal pedestrian systems, crosswalks or bus stops? 7. Developer should consider placement of bicycle racks on site for use by residents and visitors. A consultant inspection agreement will be required for this project. The subject material is being reviewed by Mr. Dan Herlihy. He can be contacted at 952-6020 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Very truly yours, Ori ina! S gned By EACiINER A.W. BACHNER Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering & Safety c~s. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold Mr. Raymond Jacobs, Town of Southold AWB:DH:EK PLANNING BOARD MEMB~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 30, 1999 Terence G. Lewis, Sr. U.S. Retirement Communities 101 Chesley Drive Media, PA 19063-1761 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lewis, The enclosed letter was received from The NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. The letter is being sent to you for your attention. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please contact this office. Sin~r/?l/y, , / ~o]~Pt Gl kdss~ner site Plan Reviewer Bernadette Castro Commissioner New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Peebles Island, PO Box 169, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 Carol A. Farkas Environmental Analyst NYS DEC Region 1 Building 40 SUNY at Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY 11790 August 20, 1999 518-237-8643 Re: NYS DOH/NYS DEC 1-4738-018051/00001 Peconic Landing/Brecknock Hall T/Southold, Suffolk Co. 98PR0237 Dear Ms. Farkas: The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) has reviewed the Archeology Reports for the Peconic Landing Continuing Care Retirement Community Project in accordance with the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law, Section 14.09 and implementing regulations. Based upon this review, it has been determined that Prehistoric Sites #! and #2 meet the criteria for ' t ' ' listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. The OPRHP recommends avoidance of these archeological sites. Submission of an acceptable avoidance plan, including protection measures, implementing/monitoring procedures, and redesign of the project (if necessary) should be submitted tot OPRHP review before construction begins. If avoidance of these sites is not feasible, OPRHP recommends Stage 3 Data Recovery excavations be conducted. An appropriate Stage 3 Data Recovery plan should be developed and submitted for OPRHP review before excavation begins. In addition, the previously requested photographic survey of existing structures within the project area has not been submitted for our review. Our full evaluation of potential impacts of this project cannot be made until all information is available for review. If you have any questions, please call Rober[ Kuhn at (518) 237-8643 ext. 3255. Sincerely, Ruth L. Pierpont Director, Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Cc: Thomas M. Jung, RA, NYS DOH .~ Robert G. Krassner, Town of Southoli~ W. Roberts, Greenhouse Consultants RLP/RDK:jw An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency PLANNING BOARD I~I~MB~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 20, 1999 Terence G. Lewis, Sr. U.S. Retirement Communities 101 Chesley Dr. Media, PA 19063-1761 Re~ Proposed site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lewis: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 19, 1999: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional six month extension of conditional approval from August 31, 1999 to February 28, 2000. Conditional final approval was granted on August 31, 1998. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, ri wski, Jr Chairman CRAIG SIRACUSA, PE REGIONAL DIRECTOR STATE Of NEW YOrK DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIal Highway HauPPauge, N.Y. 11788 JOSEPH H, BOARDMAN COM ~4ISSION ER June 28, 1999 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Young and Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Your June 15, 1999 Resubmission Peconic Landing at Southold Route 25, Greenport Our Case No. 97-263 Dear Mr. Wolpert: This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject case number. The plans must also include the County tax map number. The subject material is being reviewed by Mr. Dan Herlihy. He can be contacted at (516) 952-6020 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly y. purs, j Original S~eo By THOM~q r [3FI ERICH THOMAS F. OELERICH, P.E. Regional Traffic Engineer CC; Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southol~ Mr. Raymond Jacobs, Town of Southold TFO:JH:JS ;outhold Town · '='ianning Board YOJJt~. & yoql40 E~ni~m (.G16) 727-014~ These plans have bee~ _a_ _me? to address the items indicated in your letter dated December 22, 1998 (cory ~- Aiso enclosed is a copy of the NYSDOT Interim Accident Su~lt~~:~ through March 31, 1998, Based on our review of this data, we have eleven reported accidents in the three year period did not generate a pel~em that would indicate a specif~ deficier~ or problem, this pro~'t please do not hesitate to TCW/In EncL APPLICANT: CASE NO: r'4(CW SUBMITTAL: REVISED: ROUTE NO: REVIEWER: JP REQGII~ + 1 Set Pdr~ cc: Mr. Mr. John F. f yOUrS, C. Wolpert, P.E. PLANNING BOARD MI~MBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSK/, JR, Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Edward Forester, Building Department Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Proposed Temporary Non-Habitable Model Display House at Peconic Landing June 11, 1999 The Planning Board has reviewed the above request for a non-habitable display house to be located in the Limited Business portion of the property. The Board approves of this temporary display house to be located near the existing structures in this area. The display house will be removed when full build out is accomplished. YO~ & YO~ ~00 O~nd~ Av~u~ Riv~h~d~ ~ Yo~k 11901 TQlel,h*,~ (BIB) 727-2209 [el!~imiia (~16) 727-O14-4 HOWARD W. YOtlldO, Land TNOId,~ C. W'OLPERT, JOHN ~(~HXURR, Lend May19,1999 ATTN: Mr. Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, T/O Southold (97-0290) Dear Mr. Yakaboski: Enclosed is one (1) set of the Site Plan & Details (Sheets 1-8), last dated August 24, 1998 and Boundary Survey (Sheet 9 of 9), dated September 17, 1997. These drawings are forwarded to you at the request of Mr. Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. TCW/In Encl. cc: ,/Mr. Robert G. Kassner Mr. John Dussling Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. HAY 2 0 1999 FOUNDER Sidney B Bowne, P.E., LS. (1922-1959) · OWNE SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON LLP CONSULTING ENGINEERS Chester C. Kelsey, PE., Robert A, Stantcn, P.E. Frank J Antetomaso, PE George L Fagan, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. ASSOCIATES Jer~y D Almont, PE Paul F. Stevens, PE Roger L. Cocchi~ P.E Cad E. Becker, P.E Richard P. Stutzah, PE. ATLANTA OFFICE Ed BroWn, Direclor April 9, 1999 Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Agreement for Engineering Services Peconic Landing Project SENIOR STAFF Francis J. Lynch Richard B. Weber Ralph Anderson, LS. Fredric C. Griffi~hs, Jr, LS Gregg G. Kelsey, PE. Dane C, Kenny, Richard N. Annitto Even S. Gorin Stebhen M. Hrbek John V. Speronr Gentlemen: Enclosed is the Agreement for the above referenced project. Please return one signed copy to us for our files. We look forward to serving the Town of Southold. Sincerely, Frank J. Antetomaso, P.E. FJA:js CC: iS$outhold~agreement transltr.doc APR 1 g 1999 Southold Town Planning Board 235 East JerichoTumpike · P,O. Box 109 · Mineola, New York 11501 · (516) 746-2350 · FAX: (516) 747-1396 45 Manor Road · Smithtown, New York 11787 · (516) 724-0611 501 Means Street N,W, · Atlanta, GA 30318 · (404) 525- 5405 An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/H AGREEMENT between TOWN OF SOUTHOLD and SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON, LLP CONSULTING ENGINEERS THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 1999 by and between the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, a municipal corporation of the State of New York, having its office at 53095 Main Road, Southold, N. Y. 11971, hereinafter called the TOWN, party of the first part, and CHESTER C. KELSEY, ROBERT A. STANTON, ZABDIEL A. BLACKMAN, FRANK J. ANTETOMASO AND GEORGE L. FAGAN, doing business as SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON, 235 E. Jericho Turnpike, Mineola, New York 11501, hereinafter called the ENGINEER, party of the second part. WHEREAS, the TOWN desires to employ the ENGINEER to render certain professional engineering services related to the Town for construction phase services related to Peconic Landing Project for the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS, the ENGINEER is skilled and experienced in the services required and so adequately staffed that the immediate and efficient undertaking of the required work can be accomplished; and WHEREAS, the ENGINEER is willing to provide these services for the consideration and upon the terms hereinafter stated; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and of the mutual covenants herein set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION 1. BASIC SERVICES OF THE ENGINEER 1.1. It is agreed that the ENGINEER'S obligation under this Agreement run to and are for the benefit of only the TOWN. 1.2 The scope and details of the services to be performed under this Agreement are more fully described in Exhibit 1, Proposal for Engineering Services letter dated January 27, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. OPTIONAL SERVICES BY ENGINEER 2.1 One or more additional services may be required in carrying out the work. Because it is not possible to determine in advance the need for such services, they are included as separate from the basic services. These optional services will be undertaken only upon written authorization by the TOWN. SECTION 3. SERVICES BY TOWN 3.1 It is agreed that certain services shall be performed or furnished by the TOWN. These services include: 3.1.1 Assisting and cooperating with the ENGINEER in completing the work in a timely and effective manner; 3.1.2 Designating a representative who shall have authority to transmit instructions, receive information and enunciate TOWN'S policies and decisions; 3.1.3 Make available existing data concerning the TOWN'S facilities; 3.1.4 Arranging for and holding promptly any special meetings and any required meetings as requested by the ENGINEER, serve all required public and private notices, receive and act upon all protests and fulfill all requirements necessary in the development of the projects, and pay all costs incident, thereto; 3.1.5 Providing access to and obtaining permission for the ENGINEER to enter upon public and/or private lands as required for ENGINEER to perform surveys, observations or other necessary functions; 3.1.6 Furnishing required approvals, permits or consent from governmental or regulatory bodies or others, which the ENGINEER determines is necessary for the completion of the work; 3.1.7 Making available to the ENGINEER all of its existing information which may in any way be pertinent to the work herein described; 3.1.8 Responding within a reasonable time to the ENGINEER'S requests for written decisions or determinations, pertaining to the work, so as not to delay the services of the ENGINEER; 3.1.9 Giving prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever the TOWN becomes aware of any event, occurrence, condition or circumstance which may substantially affect the ENGINEER'S performance of services under this Agreement; 3.1.10Taking all municipal, corporate or other action necessary to authorize, finance and carry out this Agreement and to ensure that this Agreement constitutes a valid and binding Agreement of TOWN; SECTION 4. AMOUNT AND METHOD OF PAYMENT 4.1 For all engineering services provided, payment shall be made in accordance with Exhibit 1. SECTION 5. CHANGES 5.1 The TOWN may, at any time, by written order, make changes in the services or work to be performed within the general scope of this Agreement. 5.2 If such changes cause an increase or decrease in the ENGINEER'S cost of, or time required for, performance of any service under this Agreement, an equitable adjustment shall be made and this Agreement shall be modified in writing accordingly. 3 SECTION 6. SUSPENSION OF WORK 6.1 The TOWN may order the ENGINEER in writing to suspend, delay, or interrupt all or any part of the ENGINEER'S services for such period of time as the TOWN may determine to be appropriate. 6.2 If the performance of all or any part of the ENGINEER'S services is suspended, delayed, or interrupted by the TOWN'S act or failure to act, an adjustment shall be made, if warranted, for any increase in the cost of performance of this Agreement (including profit) caused by such suspension, delay, or interruption and the Agreement shall be modified in writing accordingly. 6.3 Such suspension delay, reduction or interruption shall not give rise to any cause of action for damages against the TOWN. SECTION 7. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 7.1 It is expressly understood and agreed that the TOWN may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving the ENGINEER 10 days written notice either personally at one of the offices of the ENGINEER or by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the principal office of the ENGINEER. The ENGINEER may terminate this Agreement upon 20 days written notice if the TOWN does not pay the ENGINEER'S invoices within 60 days after receipt of the invoice by the TOWN or if the TOWN otherwise substantially fails to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. 7.2 In the event that this Agreement is terminated by either the TOWN or the ENGINEER, the ENGINEER shall be compensated for all services performed to the date of termination including reimbursable expenses then due. For those portions of services rendered to which this arrangement cannot be applied, payments shall be based upon reasonable rates for the ENGINEER'S actual time spent on the work. 7.3 Such termination shall not give rise to any cause of action for damages or extra renumeration against the TOWN. SECTION 8. INSURANCE 8.1 The ENGINEER shall secure, and maintain such insurance as will protect him from claims under the Workmen's Compensation Acts and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may rise from the performance of his services under this Agreement, in limits of $1,000,000./$2,000,000. bodily injury, $500,000. property damage, and a professional liability policy in an amount of not less than $1,000,000. insuring the consultant against errors and omissions. The said insurance policies or certificates shall be submitted to the Town Attorney for approval as to form and context prior to contemporaneous with the signing of this Agreement and copies thereof shall be supplied to the Town Clerk to be filed therewith. SECTION 9. INDEMNITY 9.1 ENGINEER shall indemnify and hold harmless TOWN from and against all suits, claims, demands or actions for any injury sustained or alleged to be sustained by any party or parties in connection with the alleged negligent performance or negligent performed by the ENGINEER, his employees or agents or any subcontractor and in case of any such action shall be brought against the TOWN, the ENGINEER shall immediately take charge of and defend the same at his own cost and expense. SECTION 10. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 10.1 All completed drawings, tracings and master specification sheets to be prepared and furnished by the ENGINEER shall remain the property of the ENGINEER upon their approval and acceptance, in writing, by the TOWN or upon prior termination of the ENGINEER'S services. The ENGINEER shall furnish to the TOWN one (1) complete set of sepia reproductions of the contract drawings at no charge. 10.2 The ENGINEER'S tracings or master specification sheets or reproductions of them in whole or in part shall not be used in additions to the Project or on any other project, except upon written agreement with the ENGINEER. SECTION 11, GENERAL PROVISIONS 11.1 This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the legal representatives and successors of the parties, respectively. 5 11.2 Interpretation and enfomement of this Agreement shall be in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 11.3 Except as this Agreement otherwise provides, all claims, counter-claims, disputes and other matters in question between the TOWN and ENGINEER arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach of it will be decided by arbitration. 11.4 The ENGINEER must obtain the TOWN'S approval prior to using a subcontractor. 11.5 The ENGINEER specifically agrees, as required by the General Municipal Laws, Section 109, that he is prohibited by law from assigning, transferring, conveying, subletting or otherwise disposing of the Agreement, or of his right, title or interest therein, or his power to execute such Agreement, to any other person, company or corporation, without the previous consent in writing of the TOWN. 11.6 The ENGINEER, in entering into this Agreement, specifically agrees that the provisions of Sections 103-A and 103-B of the General Municipal Laws, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, applies to this Agreement, and that the parties expressly covenant and agree that they and this Agreement are fully subject to the provisions of the said laws. 11.7 The ENGINEER shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings, or specifications supplied by him and he shall hold harmless the TOWN from loss or damage resulting therefrom, providing, however, that the TOWN, within ten (10) days after receipt of any notice of infringement or of summons in any action therefor, shall have forwarded the same to the ENGINEER in writing to the address herein given for the ENGINEER. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the TOWN and the ENGINEER, acting herein by their duly authorized representatives have hereunto set their hands this day and year first above written. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SIDNEY B, BOWNE & SON LLP CONSULTING ENGINEERS I~RANK'J. Ac~ETOMASO, PARTNER WITNESS: TOWN CLERK \\BMS I\CLIENTI\SOUTHOLD~AGREEMNT.DOC 7 FOUNDER (1922-1959) PARTNERS Chester C. Kelsey, P.E., LS. Robert A. S~anton, P.F- Frank J, Antetomaso, P.E. George L. Fagan, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. gWNE SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON LLP CONSULTING ENGINEERS EXHIBIT 1 January 27, 1999 Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposal for Engineering Services Peconic Landing Project SENIOR STAFF Franc~s J. Lynch Richard 0, Weber Fredric C. Gdffiths, Jr., ES. Gregg G. Kersey, P.E. Richard N. Annitto Gentlemen: We are pleased to respond to your request for proposal to provide assistance to the Town for construction phase services for the Peconic Landing Project. In accordance with our discussions, we understand that the Town requests Engineering and Building Department support related to the construction of the buildings as well as the infrastructure. We have reviewed the Draft Construction Schedule that you were provided by the Developer and note that a very intense and "fast track" approach has been indicated. In summary, after several months of site preparation, construction of Phase I activities including the Health Center, Community Center, 45 Cottages and Infrastructure improvements will begin. Many activities are proposed to progress concurrently. Phase II activities including the remaining 52 cottages and infrastructure improvements are scheduled to begin approximately one year after the start of Phase I activities, however, the apartment building (listed under Phase II) is also scheduled to begin concurrently with Phase I work. The intense portion of the construction schedule indicates that all building construction and infrastructure improvements will occur over an eighteen (18) month period. With that schedule in mind, we have estimated the cost of our services as follows: 235 East Jericho Turnpike · P.O. Box 109 · Mineola, New York 11501 · {516) 746 * 2350 · FAX: (516) 747- 1395 45 Manor Road · Smithtown, New York 11787 · (518) 724-0611 501 Means Street N.W. · Atlanta, GA 30318 · (404) 52,5-5405 SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON Planning Board Office Date: lanuary 27, 1999 Page: 2 A. Full Time Resident Inspector During the intense period of construction, we propose a full time representative in order to support the matrix of constant and apparent uninterrupted activities proposed. Our inspections will cover both building and site construction. A report will be produced outlining dally activities and our representative will be in direct communication with a designated representative of the Town, · 18 month schedule · 78 weeks x 5 days/week x 8 hours/day = 3,120 hours · 3,120 hours x $27/hour (approximate base salary) x 3.0 (multiplier) = $252,720 B. Part Time Support of Resident Engineer Based on the intense schedule presented, we anti. cipate that it will be necessary to assist our resident inspector with such items as pavement inspections (which require full time review), special building inspections, resolution of unforeseen construction issues and conflicts and attendance at technical meetings. · Assume 20% participation · 3,120 hours x 20% = 624 hours · 624 hours x $24/hour (approximate base salary) x 3.0 (multiplier) = $44,928 C. Total Estimated Cost of Services = $297,648 Please note that if the project progresses to a longer time period, it is likely that the cost of our services will increase. We propose compensation based on 3.0 times the base salary of our people working directly on the project. In the case where special outside professionals may be required, we propose to "pass through" their expenses at cost plus ten percent (10%) for overhead and handling. Billings will be made on a monthly basis and payments shall be received within 30 days after date of invoice. As discussed, sanitary sewer inspection and water main inspections will be performed by other agencies. There are certain building inspection items that traditionally are performed by a professional hired directly by the developer who would provide certifications to the Town. These items may include: SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON Planning Board Office Date: January 27, 1999 Page: 3 · Piles · Structural Steel · Electrical Inspection · Fire Sprinklers · Soil Analysis · Welding · Tension Testing · Concrete Testing · Flame Spread Certificates We have not included the cost of these inspections in the above estimated fees. Please call us if there are any questions. Sincerely, Frank J. Antetomaso, P.E. FJA:PFS:js Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Plainning Board Raymond L. Jacobs, Superintendent of Highways Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement i:\southold~peconic_oro0osal.doc CRAIG SIRACUSA, P.E REGIONAL DI RECTOR STATe Of NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VEteraNs MEMORIAl Highway HaUPPAUgE, N.Y. 11788 JOSEPH U BOARDMAN COMMISSIONER April 28, 1999 Mr. Richard F. Lark Lark & Folts Attorneys at Law 28785 Main Road P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, New York 11935-0975 Your April 15, 1999 Submission Breakers at Lands End Route 25, Greenport Our Case No. 89-229 Dear Mr. Lark: This concerns the return of surety bond number 30313770, issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, in the amount of $120,000.00, which was submitted to this office on May 10, 1990. Our records indicate that a Highway Work Permit was never issued for this work, therefore, we will not require that the subject bond be renewed. The original bond is not available for return, therefore this correspondence will terminate your responsibility. Questions concerning this case should be directed to our Permit Engineer, Mr. Vito Lena, at 952-6020. Very truly yours, '~HOM~.S f OELERICH THOMAS F. OELERICH Regional Traffic Engineer CC: Mr. Raymond Jacobs, Town of Southold Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southol~ APR g 9 1999 Southold Town TFO:VFL:JS Planning Board CRAIG SIRACUSA, RE. REGIONAL DIRECTOR STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUgE, N.Y. 1 1788 JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN COMMISSIONER April 20, 1999 Mr. Richard F. Lark Lark and Folts Attomeys at Law 28785 Main Road P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, New York Dear Mr. Lark: 11935-0973 Your April 15, 1999 Letter The Breakers at Lands End Route 25, Greenport Our Case No. 89-229 This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject case number. The plans must also include the County tax map number. The subject material is being reviewed by Mr. Dan Herlihy. He can be contacted at (516) 952-6020 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, THOMAS F. OELERICH, P.E. Regional Traffic Engineer CC: Mr. Raymond Jacobs, Town of Southold Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold ~ APR 31 Southold Town Planning Board BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 20, 1999 Maureen Liocione Towmey, Latham,Shea & Kelley, LLP Attorneys at Law 33 West Second Street Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Request for status of Site Plan for Peconic Landing Dear Ms. Liccione, The Planning Board Has received your letter of March 25, 1999, requesting a status report of the above project. The following numbering of questions and answers are as contained in your letter: (1) Certification by the Building Inspector This certification is pending completion of all other conditions of approval (2) Review by Suffolk County Department of Health Services In progress, pending DEC approval (3) Review by the Architectural Review Committee This approval was granted (4) A curb Cut permit Letter of approval received, awaiting permit (5) New York State Departmental of Environmental Conservation permit DEC permit awaiting completion of archaeological survey (6) An archaeological survey Survey completed, will be sent to the State office in response to their comments If you have any questions regarding any of these items, please contact this office. Site Plan Reviewer Encl. cc: John Dussling, U.S Retirement Communities PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM g. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: Edward Forester, Building Department Robert G. Kassner,Site Plan Reviewer~.~ Peconic Landing Route 25, Greenport DATE: April 6, 1999 The Planning Board has reviewed your memo of March 30, 1999, regarding a display home to be placed temporarily at the above location. As this will be a temporary structure and not connected to water or septic, the Board Approves its use as a display only. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman FROM: Edward Forrester, Building Department DATE: March 30, 1999 RE: Peconic Landing Please be advised, the developer of the above referenced project has indicated that plans will be forwarded to me in the near future regarding a display home to be placed temporarily at the location noted on the attached plan. This location will keep potential visitors well outside of the construction zone. This display will not be attached to any water or septic, there will be no office use of the structure it will be a temporary long term display. The display will eventually be moved to a permanent foundation within the site before a CO is issued for it's occupancy. Please indicate the Boards reaction or comments regarding this plan. Southold Town Planning Board TWOMEY ~ LATHAM~ SHEA ~ KELLEY, LLP mliccione~ uffolkIaw,com March 25, 1999 Ms. Valerie Scopaz Planning Director Town of $outhold Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re~ Peconic Landing Dear Valerie~ This letter is a follow-up to our telephone converaation yesterday. As we discussed, our review of the Planning Board file indicates that the conditional final approval has been extended to August 31, 1989 ~ubject to the following conditions: (1) certification by the Building Inspector; (2) review by the Suffolk county Department of Health Services; (3) review by the Architectural Review Committee (this approval appears to have been granted on February 11, 1999); (4) A curb cut permit; (5) New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Permit; (6) An archaeological survey. (We understand that the archaeological survey has been prepared and is now being reviewed by the State.) Ms. Valerie Scopaz~ March 25, 1999 Page -2- As we discussed, I understand that your office will be able to tell us the status of each of these conditions. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Mau~en T. Licc&one MTL:lsw Mr. Charles Kozora, Superintendent Board Members William F. Bogardus Secondar~ princi~ Thomas L. Rabbitt Guidance & Special Education Director Greenport Public Schools 720 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944-1599 Phone: 516/477-1950 Fax: 516/477-2164 Charles Kozora Superintendent Barbara H. Claps Elemellt~y Principal Robert Costantint Athletic Director March & 1999 Mr. Bennett d. Orlowski, Chairman SouthoM Town Planning Board Main Road- PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: It was a pleasure to meet with you and the Planning Board on February 23. Since that meeting and our introduction to Mr. Cuddy, we are beginning to open up dialogue between Peconic Landing and ourselves. The Board of Peconic Landing is scheduled to meet with the Greenport Board of Education on March 17 at our regular monthly scheduled meeting. We are hoping to come to an agreement which will protect the Greenport School District from any loss of school tax assessment nd dollars. It is important to us to achieve this agreement prior to final approval of the site plan. Please keep us informed as to the progress of the approval. We wouM hope our goals will be considered before final approval is' granted. It is important that we keep the lines of communication open between us. Please call us when there are any future meetings or workshops scheduled to the referenced project, Thank you for your continued cooperation. Very truly yours, Lisa Israel PresMent, Greenport Board of Education L1/maw CC; Board of Education Mr. Cuddy NEW YORK STATE ~ Bernadette Castro Conlmissioner New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Service's Bureau Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 Carol A. Farkas NYS DEC Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Dear Ms. Farkas, February 9, 1999 518-237-8643 RE: DEC/DOH/SEQRA Peconic Landing/Lifecare Greenport, Suffolk Co. 98PR0237 Thank you for requesting the comments of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHp). We are reviewing the project in accordance with the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law, Section 14.09. The report prepared by Greenhouse Consultants does not adequately address the potential impacts of this project on archeological resources. The intensity of field testing and the reporting methods do not meet the standards adhered to by this office and do not provide enough information for our office to assess the proposed impacts. To complete our review we need to receive a revised report that addresses the concerns discussed below. Ail areas that will be impacted which are not shown to be previously disturbed must be tested. There are a number of impacts that are indicated on the project maps for which testing was not even planned. This includes gazeboes, pedestrian walk-ways, ponds, pipelines, pump stations, and any other soil disturbing activity. The testing locations should be plotted on a current version of the project map. If impacts are shown on the map but are not tested an explanation should be provided in the narrative. If areas are not tested due to prior disturbance this disturbed area must be delineated on the project map and described in the narrative. The maximum interval for shovel tests is 50 feet. Given the high archeological sensitivity of the project area, there is no justifiable reason for use of a 100 foot interval. As a result of the use of this interval and the excessive abandonment of shovel test pits the entire east side of the project area was not tested sufficiently. Other areas that were insufficient'ly tested include, but are not limited to, parking area 2, the health center, and cottages 21 to 29. A minimum of four additional shovel test pits should be excavated at a closer interval around all shovel tests that produce cultural material. This may have been done but it is not clearly indicated in the report. An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency ~ printed on recycled paper Carol A. Farkas February 9, 1999 Life Care/Brecknoch Hall Page 2 * Ail shovel tests that produce artifacts need to be identified on the field testing map. * Each area that PrOduced artifacts should be discussed in the report. * A table that su~arizes the artifacts that were recovered should be included. * What is the history of the building to be removed in the proposed apartment building area? What evidence exists of the structures shown on the historic maps? Each map documented structure should be discussed individually. * A site form is needed for the prehistoric site. The discussion regarding the structure of the site and its potential significance is inadequate at both the Stage I and Stage II levels. As a result we can not assess the adequacy of the Stage II testing although additional testing seems 'to be necessary. * By letter from OPRHP staff James Warren to Robert G. Kassner, Town of Southold Planning Board (8/5/1998), we requested original photographs of each standing structure, to be keyed to a site map. The submitted photographs are incomplete or do not clearly show subject structures; a photographic key map was not included. Buildings identified as "structure 1" and "structure~2" are not shown; "structure 6" is barely visible and appears to be a residence although identified in Figure 13 as a "metal & frame barn." In addition, no photographs of "Brecknoch Hall" are included; Brecknoch Hall and now or formerly associated accessory structures should be photo-documented and included in a supplementary submission. We will provide our additional comments when these issues are addressed. If you have any questions, please contact Ellen Cesarski at (518) 237-8643, extension 281 and refer to the OPRHP Project Review (PR) number noted above. Director, Historio Preservation Field Services Bureau cc Thomas Jung, DOH / Robert Kassner, Southold RLP:ec/jw SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE February 11, 1999, 4:30 P.M. The ARC met at Town Hall, Members present were: Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Robert W. Keith, Secretary, Mattituck Edward D.Dart, Southold Howard Meinke, Cutchogue Yan Rieger, Greenport John B. Greene, Landmark Preservation Committee Southold Toy,' ~ planning Boa[~ Also attending was Wesley R. Dickinson. PECONC LANDING (Greenport - Formal Submission). John Dusling and Robert McConnell presented a response to the Committee's questions about siding materials, colors, and pavers. Moved by Robert Keith and seconded by John Greene, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Planning Board APPROVAL WITH A CONDITION that non-flues be used to vent the heating plants in the cottages. Vote of the Committee: Ayes: All ~' DZU~,S-SMITH WINERY (Southold - Formal Submissio '~Mrs. Dzugas-Smith present'ed replies to the Committee's eadier questiion floor plans, elevations windows, doors, trim,signage photographs about a similar Southampton. Moved by 'eerie and seconded by Howard Meinke, ~s RESO to the Planning Board APPROVAL WITH ~IDITIONS that of double hung windows be used in the front, that ber frami used for window and door trim and that drawings of the front Inage be presented before ordering. Vote of the Committee: HAY HARBOR GOad-v/CLUBHOUSE Island - Formal Submission) The Commitee re/viewed materials SL ~n response to its earlier questions and noted the,.w~itten approval of Bernadette ~alsh and Reynolds DuPont, ARC memb/eds from Fisher's Island. Moved by I-_~ Dart and seconded by John Gre/ehe, it was RESOLVED to recommend to Planning Board APPR~AL. ~ Vo f the Committee: Ayes: All ~ MILES GORENKOFF OFFICE (14216 Main Road, Mattituck - Preliminary Submission) The Committee reviewed the elevations that were submitted. Moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Edward Dart, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the submission and REQUEST floor plans, site plan and a drawing of the proposed signage. Vote of the Cpmmittee: Ayes: All Robert W. Keith Secretary L__ SITE PLAN Presub mission conference (within .30 days of written request) Complete application received (within 4 months o£ presub, conference) Application reviewed at work session (witltin 10 clays of receipt) Applicant advised of necessary revisions (within o days of review) Revised sub mission received .Agency Coot dinati~)rt/ RA determination REFERRED TO: (written comments within 60 days of request) I~Board or. Trust~es ....,Si.dF 1~"'~ Y7 ilding Department (certfficat~n) . ffolk Co~y Departing partment ofTrans ~ ~pa[t~ans~ ~folk County Dept. of }tealth ~ ~ ~ire Commissio~rs ~ t enants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and~Restpict~gL ~]. ~ ~Landscape plan ~ J Sent: Io-'.Z" Y? Received:_ evie~ved by Engineer v - L '-Yr' / -with conditions ~ ' "~"" _~/31 Endorsement of sire'plan CertJ£Jcate of Occupancy inspection One year review PLA_N-NL-'qG BOARD OFFICE TOWN' OF SOUTHOLD Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Oa~:e ,~eceivefl Oa~ze Completed APPUCAllON FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SFFE PLAN New Ciqange cf Use ~e-use E~ension X ~evision of Approved Site Plan SEP I 8 t997 Name of Business or Side: Location: Address: Name of Apclicant:: Address of ApoIicanE: Teleplqcne: Owner of Land: Agenu or Person responsible for application: Address: Telephone: Sit:e plans prepared ~¥: License No.: Address: Telephone: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Greenport, T/O Southold North side of Main Road (S.R. 25) approx. 1,100 feet east of Sound Road US Retirement Communities on behalf of Peconic Landing The Georgetown Building 101 Chesley Drive, Media, Pennsylvania 19063-1761 (610) 627-2330 US Retirement Communities Younq & Younq ATTN: Howard W. Younq, L.S. 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 (516) 727-2303 Younq & Younq ATTN: Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. 61483 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 (516) 727-2303 Telel4~ma (~16} 727-2§02 I:..,.~ (SIG} 727-014.4. HOWARD W. THO¼A~ (L WOL~RT, JORl~ g~RI, IURR, L~nd February 9, 1999 ATTN: Mr. Chick Voorhis Nelson Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 RE: PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (9743290) Dear Mr. Voorhis: Enclosed is one (1) copy of the Stage 1/2 Archaeological Survey dated December 1998, for your use. This report is forwarded pursuant to the request of Mr. Robert G. Kassner by telephone on February 8, 1999. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. TCW/In Encl. Mr. Robert G. Kassner Mr. Terry Lewis Mr. John Dussling Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. PLANNING BOARD M~EMB]~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMER$ KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 9, 1999 Terence G. Lewis, Sr. U.S. Retirement Communities 101 Chesley Dr. Media, PA 19063-1761 Re: Proposed site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lewis: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday February 8, 1999: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of conditional approval from February 28, 1999 to August 31, 1999. Conditional final approval was granted on August 31, 1998. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, et 0 Iowski, Jr. Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 P~ Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN O1* SOUTItOLD MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Planning Board Ed Forrester, Building Department DATE: February 9, 1999 RE: Engineering Services, Peconic Landing At a meeting this morning with Ray Jacobs, Bennett Orlowski, myself and Dick Ward (via telephone) it was decided that the firm of Sidney Bowne & Son be selected to provide services related to Engineering and Building Department support and inspections on the above referenced project. Funding for the services would be provided by the bond and permit fees. cc: R. Jacobs FEB 0 9 1999 ~uthold Town Ptaoa~ej Board Toleplm~ (g16) 727-2202 HOWARD W. YOUII(~, La~d gu~egm 'l~OI4Ag (L WOLP~RT, Pmfeu~or, el [~n~ February 3, 1999 ATTN: Mr. Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall, 52095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Kassner: Enclosed is one (1) copy of the Stage 1 / 2 Archaeological Survey dated December 1998, for your use. TCW/dc Encl. CC: T. Lewis J. Dussling Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert Southold Town Planning Board I:.~.~1. (.S16) 727-014.4- HOWARD W. YOUIJiL La.~ February 3, 1999 ATTN: Mr, James A. Richter, R.A. Town of Southold Building Department Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Richter: Please check your records to determine if there are any outstanding items relative to the proposed drainage improvements. As discussed with you on February 3, 1999, Mr. Robert G. Kassner in the Planning Board Office has indicated that he has not yet received a sign off from you that the drainage plans are acceptable. If you determine that the drainage plans are acceptable, kindly notify Mr. Kassner at your earliest opportunity. Thank you for your continued cooperation and assistance with this matter, Very truly yours, TCW/dc cc: /./"Robert G. Kassner Terry Lewis John Dussling Thomas C. Wolpert FOUNDER Sidney B. Bowne, P E., L.S. ASSOCIATES Paul F. Stevens, P,E. Roger L. Cocchi, P.E. Carl E Backer, PE. Richard P Stutzah, P.E, January 27, 1999 Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON LLP ATLANTA OFFICE Ed Brown, Director Re: Proposal for Engineering Services Peconic Landing Project SENIOR STAFF Francis d. Lynch Richard B Weber Ralph Anderson, L.S. Frebric C. Griffitils, Jr., LS. Gr~g G. Kelsey, PE Dane C, Kenny, P.E. Gentlemen: We are pleased to respond to your request for proposal to provide assistance to the Town for construction phase services for the Peconic Landing Project. In accordance with our discussions, we understand that the Town requests Engineering and Building Department support related to the construction of the buildings as well as the infrastructure. We have reviewed the Draft Construction Schedule that you were provided by the Developer and note that a very intense and "fast track" approach has been indicated. In summary, after several months of site preparation, construction of Phase I activities including the Health Center, Community Center, 45 Cottages and Infrastructure improvements will begin. Many activities are proposed to progress concurrently. Phase II activities including the remaining 52 cottages and infrastructure improvements are scheduled to begin approximately one year after the start of Phase I activities, however, the apartment building (listed under Phase II) is also scheduled to begin concurrently with Phase I work. The intense portion of the construction schedule indicates that all building construction and infrastructure improvements will occur over an eighteen (18) month period. With that schedule in mind, we have estimated the cost of our services as follows: 235 East Jericho Turnpike · P.O Box 109 · Mineola, New York 11501 · (516) 746-2350 · FAX: (516) 747-1396 45 Manor Road · Smithtown. New York 11787 · (516) 724- 0611 501 Means Street N.W. · Atlanta, GA 30318 · (404) 525- 5405 An Equa~ Opporlunity Employer N~IF/R SIDNEY B, BOWNE & SONO Planning Board Office Date: January 27, 1999 Page: 2 A. Full Time Resident Inspector During the intense period of construction, we propose a full time representative in order to support the matrix of constant and apparent uninterrupted activities proposed. Our inspections will cover both building and site construction. A report will be produced outlining daily activities and our representative will be in direct communication with a designated representative of the Town. · 18 month schedule * 78 weeks x 5 days/week x 8 hours/day = 3,120 hours · 3,120 hours x $27/hour (approximate base salary) x 3.0 (multiplier) = $252,720 B. Part Time Support of Resident Engineer Based on the intense schedule presented, we anticipate that it will be necessary to assist our resident inspector with such items as pavement inspections (which require full time review), special building inspections, resolution of unforeseen construction issues and conflicts and attendance at technical meetings. · Assume 20% participation · 3,120 hours x 20% = 624 hours · 624 hours x $24/hour (approximate base salary) x 3.0 (multiplier) = $44,928 C. Total Estimated Cost of Services = $297,648 Please note that if the project progresses to a longer time period, it is likely that the cost of our services will increase. We propose compensation based on 3.0 times the base salary of our people working directly on the project. In the case where special outside professionals may be required, we propose to "pass through" their expenses at cost plus ten pement (10%) for overhead and handling. Billings will be made on a monthly basis and payments shall be received within 30 days after date of invoice. As discussed, sanitary sewer inspection and water main inspections will be performed by other agencies. There are certain building inspection items that traditionally are performed by a professional hired directly by the developer who would provide certifications to the Town. These items may include: SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON ~ Planning Board Office Date: January 27, 1999 Page: 3 · Piles · Structural Steel · Electrical Inspection · Fire Sprinklers · Soil Analysis Welding · Tension Testing · Concrete Testing · Flame Spread Certificates We have not included the cost of these inspections in the above estimated fees. Please call us if there are any questions. Sincerely, Frank J. Antetomaso, P.E. FJA:PFS:js ,/~Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Plainning Board Raymond L. Jacobs, Superintendent of Highways Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement iSsouthoi~peconic~oroposal.doc Presub mission conference SITE PLAN (witl~in 30 days of written request) Complete application received (within 4 months of presub, conference) Application reviewed at work session [within 10 days of receipt) Applicant advised pi necessary revisions (within 30 days of review) Revised sub mission received V~s~d Agency Coordinatii~p~ RA determination /o. REFERRED TO: ?.w2ing geard of Apl'reals (written comments within 60 days of request) ~Board of. Trust~es ~ilding Department (certffica[ion) Suffolk Cou~y bepa~ing ~uepartment ofTrans o ' ~part~~io~ ~[olk County Dept. of llealth ~ire Commissio~rs ~raft Covenants and Restrictions FiDO Covenants and~Restr, ict~gs ~.andscape plan ~~ Received: L~ghtmg lan f/':'qr~t ~urb Cut approval ~ ~eviewed by Engineer ' t'"5 Approvnl of site plaL~ pq~il~ Endorsement of sire'plan Certificate of Occupancy inspection (Jne year rovioW RICI-L~.RD O. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITC~E ~T~M. ~. BE~E~ O~OWS~. JR. ~LL~M J. CREMER$ ~ETH L. EDW.~S PLANNI1N'G BOARD OFFICE TOVvT¥ OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P,O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 F~-~ (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-i938 Dace Received Date Completed .Filing Fee A~PUCATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN New .... Change cf Use Re-use Extension X Revision of Approved Site Plan SEP I 8 1997 Name cf Business or Si[e: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Greenport, T/O Southold LocaEion: Address: North side of Main Road (S.R. 25) approx. 1,100 feet east of Sound Road Name of Apclicant: Address cf Applicant: US Retirement Cormmunities on behalf of Peconic Landing The Georgetown Building 101 Chesley Drive, Media, ~enns~lvania 19063-1761 Telephone: (610) 627-2330 US Retirement Comm~nities Owner cf Land: Agent or Person responsible for application: Younq & Younq ATTN: Howard W. Younq, L.S. Address: 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 Telephone: .(516) 727-2303 Site plans prepared by: License No.: _Younq & Younq ATTN: Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. 61483 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 Yete.ohone: (516) 727-2303 APpu£ANT~ AFRDAV~ STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUF¥-OLK Terence G. Lewis, Sr. being duly sworn, deboses and says tha~: he resides at in the S:ete o¢ New York, and :hat he is :he owner of the above propero/, or thee ,le is the Project Director ¢ the Cor~ration which is hereby making application; that ~here are no existing sUuc~ures or improvements on the land whict~ are not shown on me Site Plan; ~a~ ~e d~e to ~e endre parcel, {nc!~dMg 8ll right-of-way, has been ctearW established and is mown on said Plan; ~a~ no ga~ ¢ ~e P!an infringes ugon any duly flied plan whJcD has no~ been abandoned bo~ as ~o Io(s 8nd as to roads; ths~ he has examined all ~le~ regula~ons adopted by ~e Planning Board ~or ~e ~ling ¢ Si~e Pfans ~nd will comply wJ~ same; ma~ the plans surmised, as approve, will no~ ~ altered or changed in any manner wi~ou[ ~e apDrovaJ ¢ the P~anning Boar~; and ~a~ ~he a~m physical improuemen~ will be installed in sm~ acco~ance plans submi~ea. Page 3 Planmng 8oard Si~e PLan Apo~ica~ion 144. 7708 HD, LB Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) Zoning District (Hamlet Density Residential, Limited Business) X Existing Use of Site Residential X Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing, indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. Refer to Site Plan 26,225 SF Gross Floor Area of ~is~ing Struc:ure(s)* 14,100 SF Gross floor area to be removed, leaving 507,725 SF Gross Roor Area of Proposed Structure(s) 12,125 SF gross floor area to remain. 8.25% Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) ~. 7o% Percent of Lot for ParKing (where applicable) 19.41% Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a vedanta and/or special exception N/A Board of Appeals - Case # & date ~]/A Board of Trustees - Case # & date N/A NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date N/A Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date N/A Case NumPer N/A Name of Applicant N/A Date of Decision N/A Expiration Date N/A Other No ~/; N/A N/a Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as dedned by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at ~he site? If sa, have proper permits been obtained? Name of issuing agen~ Number and date of ~ermit issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVAUON 0£ CONST£UCUON) MAY BE UNDE, eTAKEN UN77L APP£OVAL OF $/~E P~AN BY PLANNING BOA£O. VIOLATOr, S ARE SUBJECT TO P£OSECUT/ON. 617.21 SEQR Appendix A Shste Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The {uJJ ~),F is designed :o help acplicanr.5 and agencies determine, in zn orderi,/ manner, whe,~her a project the question o~ si§nificance. The full E,~,F is intended to 0rovide a me~.hod whereby apo[icants and agencies can be assured that the determination Full EAJ: Components: The ~uil EAr is comprised o~: three parts: Part 1: Provides obiective data and in~ormal:ion abou: a given proiect and its site. '~¥- identiJ:ying basic proiect data, it assis~ a reviewer in the analysis :hat :akes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on i~entifving the rangeof ~ossible imoacts that may occur ~rom a pro,eot cr action. It;rcvide5 guidance as ~o whether an imoac: ~s llke~v (o be considered smail to moderate or whether i[ ~s a Oa(entiaJlv- large ~mDac~ The iorm also identifies whether ~n ~m0act c~n be m~u~ated or reduced. Part 3: Jf any imDact in Par~2 ~s identified as Do[entiaily-larse. ~hen Par~3 ~s used ~a evaluate whether or no~ the DETERMINATION OF StGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions ldentil'y the Portions oi: EAr completed ior ~his proiect: ~c~ Part ~ Z Part _9 ~Pzrt 3 U~on review o~ ~he information recorded on ~his EAr (P~rts 1 and 2 ~nd 3 if a~Drooria[e), and ~ny other ~Ooctm~ information, and cons~derin~ both :he ma~icude and importance o~ each ~m~act. :¢ ~s rezsonably determined by :he lead a~ency ~hat: A. The ~roiect ,,vHl no~ result in any tar~e and ~m~or~anc ~mpac~s) an~. ~here~ore. ~s one which will not have a s~nif[can~ ~mpact on ~he environment, therefore a negative declaration wiil be prepared. B. Although the proiect could have a significant effect on the environment, there wii~ not be a si~ni{icznt e{fec~ ~or this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measure~escr~bed in PART 3 have been te~uired. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' C. The proiect may result in one or more large and impotent impact5 ;hat may have a ~ignificant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will he prepared. ' A Conditioned Ne=~tive Declaration is only valid ~or Oniisted Actions PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION e~o Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is design assist in determining whether theacuon proposed may havea significant effect on the environment. Please comptete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Peconic Landing at Southold Lifecare Community LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Northside of Main Road(NY25) approx. 1,100ft E/O Sound Rd. NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR ! BUSINESS T~Lr'PHO~'NE US Retirement Communities on behalf of Peconic Landi~g (610T 627-'2330 ADDRESS 101 Chesley Drive CITY/PO STATE Media PA NAME OF OWNER (1! different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ADDRESS CiTY/PO STATE ZiP CODE DESCRIPTIONOFACT[ON Application to amend an approved site plan for construction of 118 single family detached cottages;132 apartment units; 24 unit assisted living center;and 32 bed skilled care center with supporting amenities. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. ~ Present land use: {-1Urban []Industrial :[]Forest F'lAgriculture t,~Total acreage of project area: 144.7'708 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 74.0 acres 47.9 acres Forested 49.3 acres 32.6 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0.0 acres 0.0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 2.8 acres 4.6 acres Water Surface Area (I R acres 2.4 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 1 2.4 acres 4.8 ~' 8~'qC'~/)~cres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0.7 acres 24.4 acres Other (Indicate type).T'awns/T'andscaping 4.8 acres 28.1 acres --,.,U.t.,~'3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project s re? Haven & _ a. Soil drainage: ~Well drained-t)'5 ~O % of site ~Poorly drainedf5 % of site r-lCommercJal [Residential (suburban) Y~JRural (non-farm) ~[~Other vacant/old field ~ ~o~&~. ~ Riverhead Series /RqModerately well drained I'~O % of site A/4.~:X¢~Pr /Hu~X. ARE b If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System,~iiJ~l~cres. {See 1 NYCRR 370), /~, _ ~(,'~'~'. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? I~Yes a. What is depth to bedrock? ,,k',R" 5..~' (in feet) 2 ~^gproximate percentage ot propc~ project s~te with slopes: X.-JO;lu~/o L~ ~U-~ a ~'o 25 % ]~15% or ~ % ~ Is proiect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? [Yes unknown ~ 19!;th. century l~aDsion ~r: s pro ect SUDstantlally contiguous toga site hsted on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? []Yes R'lNo I~ What is the depth of the water table? fl_~f~ (in feet) ~ Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? RYes ~-lNo · V'~. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? OYes Y-INo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ~; OYes [~No According to Identify each species ~-12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? {i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [~Yes ~No Describe Bluffs ,vr3. is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhbod as an open space or recreation area? C]Yes ~]No If yes, explain ~,'f4. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E~Yes f~No m ~,'ff'5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NA a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name .~.~y_qD_~' ~w w~fland C.P-11/LI Sound b. Size (In acres) 3,6 acres Is the site served by existing public uti[ides? ~Yes f-iNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~]Yes ~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? C]Yes I-lNo Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? I-Wes [~:No Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 CIyes [~o ~Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? r-lyes ~gNo B. Project Description · " ' v~t~'Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 144. ??~n acres. b. Project acreage to be developed:144,7708 acres initially; 144. 7708 c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ~ (If appropriate) .. e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N~ f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 2 ~.~,'~g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 175 ~ h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family L ~ . Two Family ' nitia,[~¢ ~l~.14~ m Ultin~ately _~_ I1~ ~" ) ~ i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35 ~, ~,~ Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? I c;f~0 3 acres ultimately. ; proposed 5¢3' ~jectF (upon completion of pr ' Multiple Family Condominium height; 2.~_~ width; _,_9 6 5 length. ft. .~lOW m~.Jch natural material /i.e, rocK.~,earth, etc. J will be removed from the sitel~~. tons/cubic yards Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~l~Yes I--INo [N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? ~t-c~rmwater Manaqement b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes F~No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes []No 42.8 ~- ~0'~¢~ How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? : - . · acres. Will any mature forest (]~,~,gl~e~i~;~[~ or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? OPe'N I~No L,,,,6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 18 ~,~ If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month , d. is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? r-lYes vS. Will blasting occur during construction? []Yes ]~No ~ Number of jobs generated: during construction ~lflfl v'f0. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 1 ~qq. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? months, (including demolition). ~No year, (including demolition). year. · after project is complete 100 full . ' time 85 part time r-lYes ]~]No If yes, expJain ~. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes r~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name'of water body into which effluent will be discharged ls subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~ ~1o Type 1/14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ::[]Yes [No Explain water surface increases from 0.8 to 2.4 acres t'"'15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? J~]Yes C1No aill the project generate solid waste? ~lyes I-INo · If yes, what is the amount per month ~ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ]C]Yes I~No c. If yes, give name ~guthold ~ransfe: Stat±on; location cutchogue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? KIYes EDNo e. If Yes, explainRecyclable materials: glass~ metal~ Dare,plastics t,,17. Will the proje~:t involve the disposal of solid waste? ~Yes ~]No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. ~8. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~[Yes I-1No in ~. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)?~Yes [~o i~Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? rqYes %~. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~Yes r-lNo If yes, indicate type(s) Rlectric & fossil fuels v'2~. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~_ gallons/minute. V'~3. Total anticipated water usage per day 64 r 000 gallons/day. %~. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? C]Yes r~No If Yes, explain Routine care of landscap- 4 City, Town, ~j'f~ Board I-lYes [~No ~ Town, Vd.~a~e Planning Board I~Yes DNo ~, Town Zoniog Board D-lYes (~No :~, County Health Departmeo~ _ [~Yes~No L)tner Local Agencies~outhold [~Yes D-)No Trustees Other Regional Agencies r-lYes State Agencies NYSDEC & NYSDOT [][Yes I-1No Federal Agencies I-lYes ~gqo water & wastewater wetland permitt ~z~,~ wetland & roadway access Date ~):97 9-97 Pending Pending C. Zoning and Planning Information ~"'Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~Yes I-INo if Yes, indicate decision required: revised I-lzoning amendment ["]zoning variance I-Ispecial use permit [~subdivision I'~site plan I-Inew/revision of master plan I-Iresource management plan I-iother What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? HD-Hamlet Density; LB Limited Business i~What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 350 condominium units ~ What is the proposed zoning of the site? ~ ~5'. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? NA V~. is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [~Yes ,.,,~. What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? Residential and Golf Course I-INo ~/8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoinins/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? [~Yes DNo v-9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? NA a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? V/10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? D-lYes {~No t~l. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? [~Yes D-}No a. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I~Yes I'-INo the prop6sed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? r-lyes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additiona[ traffic? D-lYes [-1No D. Informational Details Attached [,EAt= Narrative, Sept. 1997 Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification cert fy that the information orovided above is true to the best of m~ kno~le, dge. Envir~ental Consultant for ~ne app-zcan~. ' A~dSFnYe~ NaT~/Jeff~ey~ ---- L; Seeman~,-CE~ .... Date: 9-13-97 Signature ~ ~'_~-~'~ Title President ,Coastal Environ. Cor~. · with this ass~sment,v Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any Impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c.. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to Indicate the potential size of the impact. If Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but lhreshold la lower than example, check column 1. d. Idenilfylng that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that It Is also necessarily significant. Any large Impact must be evaluated In PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact In column 2 simply asks that It bo looked st fudher. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the Impact then consider the impact es potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large Impact checked In column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) tn the project to a small to moderate Impact, also check the Yes box In column 3. A No response Indicates that such a reduction Is not possible. This must be explained In Pad 3, I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change ~ O [~es ONo O ~ []~/es F1No O O I--lyes ONo [] O OYes ONo ~ O [~es ONo O [] OYes ONo [] O OYes []No O O OYes ONo [] O OYes ONo ID" O g~es ONo IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change t? the project site? ONO Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. (~r'e.~,.~o~ · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing 8round surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site~' (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.}OHO OYES · Specific land forms: ~'~,~M':.'s-r-~-u,a~,T'7~,~r' 6 IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected~ (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ~Construction in a designated freshwaterRr tidal weL(and imII~[/°~'V~[~actS: ~X ~t'/d -'~1 °/'l Other 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water~ I-INO [~'E S Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease~ · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: Cn~d~,'~2,u,c,/'/o~ 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? I~NO Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity, · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 ga/Ions per day. * Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions, · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses Jn areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: '~,,,/T~L .~.~..~t/~F",~ 6. Will proposed action alter drainase flow or patterns, or surface water runoff~ BNO Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 1 2 3 Small to Polential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change ~ [] [~es •No 0 [] OYes •No [] O []Yes []No O I~ G~'es [] [] Oyes 0~o [] [] []Yes ONo [] O []Yes []No I~ [] ~,'es 0~o 0 0 OYes ~o 0 0 OYes Omo 0 0 OYes ~ ~ OYes 0~o ~ ~ OYes 0 0 []','es ~o 0 0 OYes ~ ~ OYes 0 ~ OYes 0~o ~ ~ []Yes Omo ~ ~ OYes ~o · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action Is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ~ Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality~ G~'40 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species~ [~40 I-WES Examples that would apply to column 2 ,/~J~l(I,3o~3'~,J. · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Applica[ion of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · O~her impacts:. 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species~' CINO Ii'ES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land reso~rces~' L~NO F'IYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.} 1-- 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] i'-IYes []No [] [] E]Yes I-Imo [] [] []Yes []No I~' [] Igi?es []No [] [] I-lyes []No [] [] []Yes i-lNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I-INo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] i-lYes []No [] [] []Yes I-INo [] [] I-lyes []No [] [] []Yes I-1No [] [] []Yes CINo [] [] []Yes []No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [:]Yes [:]No [] [] FIYes ['-~No [] [] [-]Yes f-INo [] [] []Yes [-]No [] [] I-lyes i-INn [] [] r-]Yes FINn [] [] FIyes [-]No [] [] l-lyes []No [] [] I"qYes []No D D F"lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] ~ Wes []No [] [] ,[]Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes •No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 1'1. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? [~O OYES {If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic,.pr/e- historic or paleontological importance? I-INn GSa'ES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other Impacts~/'~J ~"r-~'~ IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 I~;~f~O [:]YES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: 9 IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique character- istics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14(g) ~ [~O []YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation ol the CEA, Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? · Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? · Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? · Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource~ · Other impacts: IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems~ ~O ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems, · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [~O L~ YI: S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ener§,/ transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 sin§le or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: 10 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes [=]No [] [] []Yes I--INo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] f-lyes []No [] [] ~Yes []No [] [] [DYes E]No [] [] r-lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [] [] []Yes, ~lNo I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact impact Project Change O [] OYes []No [] [] []Yes Ohio [] [] Oyes ONo [] O OYes ONo [] [] OYes O~o O O OYes O O OYes i-)No [] O OYes [] [] OYes [] O OYes [] [] OYes []No 0 O Oyes ONo 0 0 OYes 0 0 OYes 0 ~ OYe~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ DYes ~ O OYes ~flo NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? t[2NO [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely Imore than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety,O'''"~'' []}YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances li.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, Irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other Impacts: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. WiU proposed action affect the character of the existing community? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Oevelopment will create a demand for additional community services (e,g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects· · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts:~7~a~.si,~L~ zu, is ~nere, or Is there likely to De, puolic controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacl;s? [~o oyes II any ictlon In Pe~l 2 la Identllled es a potential large Impact or II you cannot determine the magnitude or Impacl, proceed lo Pad 3 11 CRAIG SIRACUSA, PE. REGIONAL DIRECTOR STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT Of TraNsPOrTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HauPPaugE, N.Y. 11788 JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN COMMISSIONER December 22, 1998 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Young and Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Mr. Wolpert: Your October 15. 1998 Resubmission Pec0nic Landing at South01d Rotl~e 25. Gre~nport Our Case No. 97-263 This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to issuing a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: The site is located within an All Accident P.I.L. (RM 25074 1670-1674). The P.I.L. should be evaluated for impacts associated with the site generated traffic, and accident countermeasures recommended. Attached is a Request for Information (from our records) form to help expedite the material needed. Please complete Section I with as much specific information as possible. When you describe the material you are requesting, please specify the exact date (s) and location (s). Return the completed form to Mr. Stanley Lechner, Records Access Officer at the above address for processing. If you have questions regarding obtaining or viewing our records, you may contact Mr. Lechner at (516) 952-6139. In area of pavement widening, show lane width. 12 foot travel lanes must be maintained. Maintain a 10 foot shoulder. 3. Shoulder areas should be reconstructed to full depth pavement as travel lanes. Show proposed drainage work with detail and item numbers for drainage structures. Existing drainage structures must be relocated to the new curb line. ~'~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ Show details of proposed sewer main crossing Route 25. h;'~'<'"~ ~' Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. December 22, 1998 Page 2 Show how water will drain on Route 25~ Indicate low point approximately 300 feet east of the west driveway. Add additional drainage structures. New pavement markings on Route 25 lack details. Indicate taper lengths, length of the line separating the turn lane from the through lane and locations of ttm~ arrows. 8. Show all existing and proposed traffic signs. A Maintenance and Protection of Traffic Plan is required. No lane closure pemaitted between 7am to 9am and 4pm and 6pm daily, No lane closures permitted on weekends or holidays. 10. All work on route 25 must include NYSDOT item numbers and details. Please submit four sets of revised plans. The subject material will be reviewed by Mr. Dan Herlihy. He can be contacted at 952-6020 if you have any questions regarding tlfis matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Very truly yours, Original Signed By THOMAS F OELERICH THOMAS F. OELERICH, P.E. Regional Traffic Engineer Attachment cc: ?vis. Valerie Scopaz, Tovm of Southold~ rFO:DH:JS PLANNING BOARD M~EMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: Elizabeth A. Nevilie, Town Clerk Valarie Scopaz, Town Planner /~ FOIL request of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Croup, Inc. DATE: December 18, 1998 Attached is the information requested by Theresa Elkowitz in her 12/11/98 FOIL request. Please be advised that the LEAF Part III is an extra copy that can be sent to Ms. Elkowitz. ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning~ ;l~abReetqhueAs~ ~feVilrlee~d~l~ ~°k~itCzle~~Group 12/11/98 Transmitted is 12/11/98 foll request of Freudenthal & Elkowitz. Please respond to my office within five (5) business days with the number of pages of copies, so that I may advise them of the cost and collect it before you make the copies. Thank you. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Tkere,, Elko~i(,. Pre,ident Hu{o D. Freuden(kal (Re(ired-1994) RE,(: IVEE) DEC 1 1 $oulhold Town Clef~ 368 Veteran* Memorial Hi,wa; Comma&, New York 11725 Tel: 1~16} 499-222g Fu: ([16) 499-&928 December 8, 1998 Ms. Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Freedom of Information (FOI) Request Peconic Landing at Southold Dear Ms. Neville: We have reviewed the documents you provided in response to the above-referenced FOI request. The material provided included the following: August 11, 1998 correspondence to Terence G. Lewis, Sr., U.S. Retirement Communities from Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman of the Town of Southold Plarm~g Board along with the Conditioned Negative Declaration dated August 10, 1998; July 27, 1998 correspondence to James Warren of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation from Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer; July 23, 1998 correspondence to Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman of the Town of Southold Planning Board from'Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC; July 20, 1998 correspondence from Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E., of Young & Young to Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer; July 13, 1998 correspondence to Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman of the Town of Southold Planning Board from Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC; Parts 1 and 2 of the Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) with the Part 1 dated September 13, 1997; and Ms. Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Town of Southold Town Hall December 8, 1998 Page 2 Peconic Landing at Southold Life Community, Town of Southold, New York, Long Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Narrative, Response to Comments prepared by Coastal Environmental Corporation, dated June 1998. Review of the above-referenced Peconic Landing at SouthoM Life Community, Town of Southold, New York, Long Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Narrative, Response to Comments prepared by Coastal Environmental Corporation, dated June 1998 indicates that there was a prior Part 3 submitted by the applicant. Specifically, Appendix 1 of that document contains correspondence dated Novem~r 14, 1.997 from Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC which comments on the "Long EAF, Parts 1 and 3." In addition, it appears that there was a concern raised relative to potential impacts to historic and/or prehistoric resources. In that regard, there was correspondence from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) and, at a minimum, a Stage lA Archaeological Investigation was performed. Accordingly, we respectfully request that copies of the initial Part 3 narrative, all correspondence to and from OPRHP and all archaeological reports be provided to this office. Thank you for your continued cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, ~her/esa Elkowitz [ ~ Holzmacher, McLendon & Murreil, P.C. o lt2M Associates, IRc. H2M Construction Mmlagement, lllc.· H2M l~b~, Inc. 575 Broad Hollow Road, Melville, NY 11747-5076 (516) 756~8000 · Fax: (516) 694-4122 December 3, 1998 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Settler's Landing Development Inspection Services LP 98- 224 Dear Mr. Orlowski: At the request of Ray Jacobs, Superintendent of Highways, H2M is pleased to submit our proposal for professional engineering services in connection with the Settler's Landing Project. It is our understanding that this relatively large project is ready to move into the construction phase. It is our further understanding that due to the magnitude of the project, the Town does not have sufficient manpower to monitor the construction activities, particBlarly the infrastructure improvements. H2M has over 65 years experience in providing all types of professional engineering and architectural services to municipalities throughout Long Island and in the New York metropolitan area. Our work has included the preparation of preliminary and final designs, construction designs and monitoring of construction for a wide range of municipal infrastructure projects. The list of the type of projects H2M has experience witll includes: Roadway construction, paving, grading, etc. · Parking lot construction · Recharge Basin Construction · Storm Drainage and Leaching Pool Installation · Curb and sidewalk improvements · Earthwork and grading · Leaching pools · Sanitary Sewers & ForceMains · Water Mains · Sewage Pumping stations · Street and sitelighting 1998 Southold Town Planning Board ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS SURVEYORS I-t GROUP Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman 12/03/98 2 Besides our extensive municipal infrastructure experience, H2M has been involved in the preparation of plans for a number of development projects throughout Long Island. This has included single family residential, townhouse/condominiums plus restaurant and commercial site plans. We understand that this solicitation is for construction inspection services relative to the Settler's Landing infrastructure. We also understand that at this time the installation of the public utilities is not within Southold's responsibility to inspect. However, considering that the utilities are within the proposed roadways, it is very important that the utility crews or contractors pay close attention to back-filling the trenches and attain adequate soil compaction. Otherwise, if the trench settles, there will be a corresponding settlement in the pavement, which would mirror the utility trench. Therefore, it may be beneficial to have your inspector present when the utility trenches are being backfilled, to assure that there is adequate compaction. We would like to point out that H2M also has extensive experience in the design and construction of building structures of all types and sizes, ranging from single family homes to multi-family homes to municipal buildings, fire stations, etc. H2M has an in- house staff of architects, structural engineers, electrical engineers, mechanical engineers who can respond to any type of construction problem which needs to be resolved. Accompanying this proposal, we have provided resumes for a number of our personnel. We certainly do not expect all of the personnel whose resumes are attached would necessarily be involved in the normal day-to-day inspections. However, all of these personnel would be available to provide advice and consultation for the project inspector, either by telephone or if necessary by a field visit. The settler's Landing project wonld be managed by H2M's Civil/Infrastructure group. Mr. Donald Sloss heads the Civil Group and is a principal in the firm and is a licensed Professional Engineer. He has over 25 years experience in civil and site engineering. In fact, prior to joining H2M, he spent 3-1/2 years working for a national homebuilder, preparing site designs and construction plans for all types of housing developments. At H2M, Mr. Sioss directs all of the civil and site engineering projects including site development, roadway improvements, parking lot construction, storm drainage projects, sanitary sewer construction and on-site wastewater system construction. Mr. Sioss would manage the project and would work closely with the field inspection person. Included with our resumes are a number of personnel who have extensive experience with on-site observation. One member of our staffwould be assigned to the Settler's Landing Project. Assuming that the project commences and continues without interruption, we would intend to have this same field person assigned to the project for its' duration. If however, there is a break in the construction, it may necessitate assigning a different inspector. I-I i 4,GROUP Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman 12/03/98 3 Our field inspector would be responsible for monitoring the daily construction activity. How may hours the inspector would spend at the project would depend upon the nature of the construction activity and the level of the activity. If the developer elects to proceed aggressively, it is conceivable that our inspector would be on-site 8 hours a day. On the other hand, there may be periods where only pan-time inspection would be necessary. Generally, we recommend that an inspector be on-site full time during concrete pours and the placement of asphaltic concrete. The field inspector would report to Mr. Sloss and as necessary seek Mr. Sioss's advice and direction by telephone. Should an unusual field condition be encountered, that requires a deviation from the plans, Mr. Sloss and/or his staffofcivil engineers would be available to visit the site and work with the developer and our field personnel to resolve the situation. We have been advised that the developer is quite anxious to commence work. Not knowing the full extent of inspection services needed and what level of activity will be taking place, especially with the onset of winter, we would propose to provide our services based upon hourly rates of compensation. The project (daily) inspector would be billed at an hourly rate of: $7O.0O Attached to this proposal is a billing rate schedule for other types of personnel, who might be assigned to the project for a brief period from time to time, We would like to bring to your attention that H2M is a multi-disciplined consulting firm. Not only do we have all type of engineers available to consult with in-house, but we also have an extensive staff of architects as well. H2M has personnel available to assign to this project immediately. We assume that the town would designate a lead person who would be our point of contact for the duration of this project. This person should be able to make decisions on behalf of the town, or be able to present the issues to the appropriate town officials for a decision. In order to commence this work, we would require a signed copy of this letter, along with the attached proposal statement. This offer to perform the proposed services shall remain open for ninety (90) days from the date of this proposal. Extensions of this proposal shall be in writing only. Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman 12/03/98 4 We look forward to working with you on this project. If there are any questions concerning this proposal of any aspect of this project, please contact the undersigned at ext. 1300. We are available to meet with you and other town officials to further discuss any aspect of this proposal or the project in general. Very truly yours, Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C Vice President cc: Raymond Jacobs, Supt. of Highways I:\files\lps\d ept4700~lp98-224.doc L:~FILES\SHARED\4700\BUSDEVNT~SOI STi-tOLD,DOC Approved by: Title: Date: I--t ,/,GROUP HOLZMACHER, MCLENDON & MURRELL, P.C. SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -SETTLER'S LANDING NAME D. A. Sioss M. R. Mohlin P. Filosa M. McKeown S. Daresta K Terry R. Malizia J. McGuire L. Zabbia W. Brenan J. Munzing J. Trotta TITLE Project Manager Project Engineer StaffEngineer Sr. Structural Engineer Project Electrical Engineer Structural Engineer Chief Inspector Inspector Inspector Inspector Inspector Inspector HOURLY BILLING RATE $146.85 $84.56 $49.50 $128.70 $74.66 $53.63 $99.00 $76.73 $78.38 $76.31 $76.31 $6000 I--t GROUP PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C. (1976- Present) O'Grady-Kleeger Associates (1975-1976) Levitt and Sons, Inc. Engineering Dept. (1972-1975) EDUCATION M.S., Civil Engineering, New York University B.E., Civil Engineering, Manhattan College) REGISTRATIONS Licensed Professional Engineer- New York, New Jersey, Connecticut MEMBERSHIPS American Planning Association American Public Works Association American Society of Civil Engineers National Society of Professional Engineers Society of American Military Engineers AWARDS/HONORS National Commander of the Disabled American Veterans, 1994 - 1995 Consulting Engineers Council Honor Award for the Incorporated Village of Bayville, Perry Avenue Drainage System Project, 1983 DONALD A. SIOSS P.E. Vice President, Director of Civil/Site Engineering As Director of H2M's Civil Engineering Group, Mr. Sioss is responsible for the supervision of field surveys, preparation of designs, plans and specifications, project reports and construction observation for municipal and civil engineering projects, including roadway improvements, flood control systems, water systems, sanitary sewers, marinas, recreational facilities, landfills and parking facilities. Mr. Sioss is also in charge of all civil/site engineering, and is a technical advisor in environmental analysis and preparation of Environmental Impact Statements for private developments involving residential, commercial and industrial building construction and expansion. Mr. Sioss' major projects at H2M have included: Bethpage State Park - Project manager for the reconstruction and automation of the irhgation system at the five (5) golf courses. Smithtown Landing Country Club - Project manager for the evaluation of the various components of the county club's irrigation system. Project included the evaluation of the sprinkler heads including type, age, condition, location spacing, etc. as well as preparation of hydraulic calculations to evaluate the system. · Lake Ronkonkoma Groundwater Relief Study, Suffolk County Department of Public Works: Project manager directing the preparation of an investigation and report to alleviate recurrent groundwater flooding. Field studies were initiated as part of the investigation to include groundwater monitoring, stream gauging, field surveying and inspection of impacted homes and businesses. The study concluded that surfhce water and drainage systems were interrelated with the groundwater system and incapable of carrying sufficient water from the area to affect groundwater. It further concluded that a major upgrading of both the storm drainage system and the natural surface water system would need to be undertaken to permanently lower the groundwater levels and provide relief to the affected homeowners and businesses. · Middletown Psychiatric Center - Building 132: Project Manager for an investigation to eliminate basement flooding at a building to house geriatric patients. Rainfall caused a rapid rise in groundwater levels and consequent basement flooding. This created an unhealthy condition and posed a threat to the mechanical and electrical systems of the building. A perimeter underdrain system was designed in conjunction with a pump station to relieve the basement flooding. Kingsboro Psychiatric Center - Preparation of preliminary designs, plans and final construction plans and specifications for the complete rehabilitation of the 70 year old storm and combined sewer systems on the hospital campus to alleviate recurrent flooding. Complications included the inability to enlarge the size and amount of off-site discharge, the anticipated conflicts with other contractors working on the campus, the requirement to keep access open to all active buildings and the protection of patients. I--t GROUP DONALD A. SlOSS P.E., (continued) · The Perry Avenue Stormwater Retention Drainage System - For the Village of Bayville involved the design of an innovative, sequenced system of catch basins and leaching pools to contain the "first flush" of polluted storm water runoff, thereby alleviating both local, flooding, and the pollution of shellfishing waters at the discharge point, Mill Neck Creek. Project had to met strict NYSDEC standards and obtain agency approvals and permits. This project, which also included the recons~xuction and resurfacing of Perry Avenue, received a 1983 Honor Award for Engineering Excellence from the Consulting Engineers Council of New York State, Inc. · Flowertime Golf Club - Preparation of a development plan for a 630-acre, multi-use planned development. The new community to be build around three golf courses included single family homes, townhouse, time shares, conference center and office complex, and commercial uses. Services include complete layout of all streets, roads and developed areas including design of streets, venting sewers, storm sewers, water mains, site grading and environmental control. The system included a conventional storm sewer system and a series of 21 detention ponds on the golf course to control peak discharges. A computer model of the drainage system was prepared to rate the 2-, 10-, 25- and 100-year storm through the development. · USPS Brooklyn P&DC Facility: Prepared a preliminary study and final designs, plans, specifications and contract documents for the relocation of the employee entrance. The project included closing the old entrance, constructing a new entrance, re-alignment of parking stalls and curbed islands, a small expansion of the parking lot and the installation of bulletproof guard booths and associated entrance appurtenances (i.e. card readers, gates, loop detectors, etc. Construction phase services were also provided. Other projects include: · East Chester Street Improvements for the City of Long Beach. Several roadway projects for Patchogue. · East Half Hollow Road extension project and the East Half Hollow Road/Westminster Avenue drainage project for the Town of Huntington. · Reconstruction of Potters Lane for the Incorporated Village of Great Neck. · Drainage improvements and resurfacing of portions of Sound Avenue for the Towns of Riverhead and Southold. Godfrey Avenue reconstruction in Bayville, site engineering for several major residential projects including both attached town homes and single family homes. 6/98 I _. GROUP PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C. (1991 - Present) Gibbons, Esposito and Soyce, P.C., (1989-1990) EDUCATION O.S., Civil Engineering, Polytechnic University of New York REGISTRATION Licensed Professional Engineer- New York MEMBERSHIPS American Society of Civil Engineers National Honor Society Omega Phi Alpha AWARDS American Society of Civil Engineers, Student Chapter, Meritorious Service, 1989 MATTHEW R. MOHLIN, P.E. Project Engineer, Civil Engineering Mr. Mohlin's responsibilities include the preparation of designs, plans and specifications, and reports. His design experience includes drainage and sanitary systems; roadway and railroad design profiles and plans; parking lot design including drainage and paving; site grading and drainage design; flood control systems; irrigation system design; bulkhead and dock design; preparation of site plans; water storage tank rehabilitation; and quantity takeoffs. Selected projects Mr. Mohlin has designed and managed through construction include: Student parking lot and main entrance rehabilitation project for Fordham University in Bronx, New York. Services included the rehabilitation and resurfacing of the asphalt parking lot and the reconfiguration of the main entrance. The design also included stone paving, site lighting and landscaping. Rehabilitation and resurfacing of streets and drainage projects for the Villages of Great Neck, Patchogue and Farmingdale. Reconstruction of dock and bulkhead facilities for the Village of Ocean Beach. Services included the installation of woodpiles, sheeting and decking for open pile, docks, bulkheads and solid fill docks. The design also included dredging adjacent to the docks. Rehabilitation and repainting of elevated steel water storage tanks for the Riverhead, West Hempstead, Bethpage, Garden City Park, Oyster Bay, Franklin Square and Plainview Water Districts. Services included istmctural steel repairs and modifications to comply with OSHA requirements and application of epoxy coatings suitable for contact with potable water. Lead civil engineer on a number of projects of the United States Postal Service. These projects included the pavement resurfacing and reconditioning project at the airmail facility at LaGuardia Airport, flood mitigation project at the Queens GMF, design of the new trailer parking lot at the Mid-Island P&DC facility, and the relocation of the employee entrance at the Brooklyn P&DC. He performed on-site inspection of the sites, preparation of designs, storm drainage analyses, preparation of technical specifications and construction administration. Prior to joining H2M, Mr. Mohlin's engineering experience included the design and estimating of a road resurfacing and steel sheet pile bulkhead project. He was a specification writer for proposals and created topographical surveys while organizing a three-man survey crew. Mr. Mohlin was construction manager on many projects, some of which were for the NYS Thruway Authority and the Staten Island Rapid Transit. · 7/98 I-t ,GROUP PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C, (1998 - Present) EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering, Clarkson University, New York PASI UALE I=ILOSA Staff Engineer, Civil/Site Engineering Mr. Filosa's responsibilities include the design of drainage systems; roadway design plans and profiles; parking lot design including layout, drainage and paving; site grading and drainage design; preparation of site plans; and quantity takeoffs. Mr. Filosa participated in the design of new pavement and additional drainage for the portion of Melville Road within the Village of Farmingdale. He has also participated in the rehabilitation of North Ocean Avenue in the Village of Patchogue including brickpavers, sidewalk and street lighting upgrade. He worked on the design of a new parking lot for the Village of Great Neck, including necessary storm drainage and pavement design. Other municipal projects include: · Preparation of a site plan for the Massapequa Fire District · Pavement resurfacing quantity takeoff for the United States Postal Service · Preparation of site plan for the Dix Hills Fire District · Street lighting maintenance for the Village of Great Neck · Assistance on a drainage study for a U.S. Postal Service Facility in Kings Park. 7/98 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C. (1991 - Present) EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering, Manhaffan College REGISTRATION Licensed Professional Engineer- New York MEMBERSHIPS American Concrete Institute American Institute of Steel Construction American Society of Civil Engineers Vietnam Memorial Commission MICHAEL W. McKEOWN, P.E. Project Manager, Structural Engineering As a structural engineer, Mu'. McKeown directs the structural analysis and design of industrial, municipal, commercial, potable water, sanitary structures, high-rise curtain wall systems, low-rise building structures, wastewater treatment plants, water supply tanks, and special use structures. Project tasks have included the analysis and design of concrete plate slabs, grade beams and pile foundations, deep reinforced concrete foundations and mat foundations. Structural systems include moment and resisting frame and vertical load carrying frames of steel, concrete and/or masonry construction. Mr. McKeown's structural analysis and design experience includes: · For the USPS: post offices at Pennington, New Jersey and Whitehouse Station, New York; building modifications for a new USPS ICPS facility at Building 77, JFK Airport and various modifications to existing post office facilities throughout the New York City and Long Island area. · New vehicle maintenance facility at Strong Street Pike Fire House; three-story addition to the headquarters building for the Hicksville Fire Department, and two-story addition to the Elmont Fire District headquarters building. · Overhead travelling ladder, charging and scrap cranes for a steel mill for Hoeganaes Corp., in New Jersey. · Iron removal plant for the South Farmingdale and West Hempstead Water Districts. · Groundwater treatment plant for the Mobil Oil Corporation involving reinforced concrete plate slabs, grade beams, and pile foundations · New elevated water tanks for Village of Ocean Beach, Great Neck and Oyster Bay Water Districts, and the rehabilitation of elevated steel water storage tanks for Riverhead, Hicksville, West Hempstead, Franklin Square Water Districts. Pt/or to H2M, Mr. McKeown supervised engineers, draftsmen and construction inspectors on numerous, multi-faceted structural engineering projects. Some of which include: · Analysis and design of a two story warehouse utilizing composite "T" beam construction; treatment plants and expansions for the Pine Hills Golf Villas and Paumanok Village. · Structural support during rehabilitation of numerous concrete arch bridges along New York City's Interborough Parkway. · Preliminary design of Dowling College Treatment Plant expansion and the Village of Northport Pump Station renovation. MICHAEL W. McKEOWN, P.E, (continued) Rehabilitation of reinforced concrete tanks, and building foundations for the Village of Ocean Beach and rehabilitation to elevated steel water storage tanks for the Incorporated Village of Freeport and the Massapequa Water District. · Analysis and design of a stone facade curtain wall for the 16- story New Laboratory Building, Rockefeller University, New York City and a 17-story limestone facade for the Museum of Broadcasting in New York City. · Design of water distribution systems, roadway rehabilitatiun, and drainage systems for several municipal and private clients including the City of New York, City of Long Beach, Village of Freeport, Massapequa Water District, and the Township of Manchester, New Jersey. · Forensic engineering, investigation, report and redesign and construction management of granite facade for the 31-story corporate headquarters building for Pittsburgh National Bank, Pittsburg, Pa. and a four story Embassy of Australia, Washington, D.C. · Investigation, report and redesign and construction management of the granite cladding of the 21-story Austin Centre building in Austin, Texas and the Dade County Courthouse, Florida. · Design of steel tress frame curtain wall system for three mid-rise office buildings in Troy, Michigan. · Structural engineering consultant for Samsung USA headquarters in Parsippany, New Jersey. · Concrete mat foundation design for a 150,000 ground storage water tank, and the preparation of an engineering report on the structural evaluation of the Village of Babylon municipal pool complex. · Rehabilitation of the Garden City pool complex, a $350,000 renovation of the pool house facility which included new restrooms, shower lockers and changing areas, new roof, facade and entrance As a member of the Vietnam Memorial Commission, Mr. McKeown volunteered approximately 400 manhours for the conceptual development of the memorials and the structural design of the steel tower which is located in Farmingville, New York. · 4/96 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrel], P.C. (1995- Present) Malcolm Pirnie (1991-1995) EDUCATION B,S., Electrical Engineering, New York Institute of technology MEMBERSHIPS Illuminating Engineering Society of North America National Fire Protection Agency Volunteer Fire Fighter for the Massapequa Fire District Past Lieutenant - Elmont Fire District STEPHEN A. DARESTA Staff Engineer, Electrical Engineering Mr. Daresta has over six years experience in the field of electrical engineering. He provides all aspects of electrical design from lighting and power calculations to circuiting, layout and coordination. His responsibilities include designs of new service distribution; existing service upgrades; motor control centers; fire alarm systems; card access, and closed circuit monitoring systems. He also has a working knowledge of CADD, shop drawing review, specification writing, and participates in site surveys and inspections. Selected H2M projects include: · Generator installations for the Town of Hempstead Housing Authority. Design of postal stores within existing facilities at the North Babylon, Valley Stream, Cedarhurst, Smithtown, North Massapequa and Southold Postal Facilities. Closed circuit television system (CCTV) and security study for the U.S. Postal Service Mid Island P&DC, Brooklyn P&DC and the Morgan Station Postal Facilities · Design of 12 new distribution transformers and power panels for the Brooklyn P&DC. · New electrical service, lighting and power designs for the Mid- Island Postal Annex, Melville, New York. · Electrical service design for HVAC upgrade at the Huntington Station Postal Facility. Survey, report and as-built drawings of existing electrical conditions at the Mid-Island P&DC. JFK Building 250, Queens GMF and the Brooklyn P&DC. Prior to joining H2M, Mr. Daresta was a project engineer for Malcolm Pimie, Inc. of White Plains, New York. As part of the electrical design group, he participated in the electrical design of various buildings associated with treatment plants and fire alarm systems, as well as the electrical start-up of many mechanical pumps, motors, and other related equipment. Projects included Cedar Creek Pelletization Plant and Sewage Treatment Plant; Wards Island Sewage Treatment Plant, Norwalk Water Treatment Plant, Vernon Water Treatment Plant, and Massachusetts Water Resource Authority Deer Island Treatment Plant. · 11/96 Ifl GROUP PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C. (1998 - Present) EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Virginia CERTIFICATIONS Engineer in Training-New York KEVIN R. TERRY Staff Engineer, Structural Engineering As a structural engineer, Mr. Terry's responsibilities include the design of industrial, commercial and sanitary structures. He has experience with the renovation and evaluation of existing structures, as well as with the design of new low-rise buildings. His structural designs involve timber, reinforced concrete, structural steel and masonry. Selected projects include: · Structural analysis and design of reinforced concrete tankage for the Riverhead Sewer District. · Structural design of Gabreski Air Force sewage treatment facility. · Design of foundations and structural steel for the Elmont Fire District expansion. Prior to joining H2M, Mr. Terry was responsible for highway construction projects and the inspection of concrete paving, materials testing, interpretation of working drawing and specifications on numerous projects for the New York State Department of Transportation. · 6/98 I-I _. GROUP PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE HoJzmacher, McLendon & Murrel;, P.C, (1963 - Present) EDUCATION Construction Technology, Suffolk County Community College MEMBERSHIPS New York Water Environment Federation Society of Asphalt Technologists AWARDS/HONORS H2M Group Employee Excellence Award, 1992 ROBERT IS. MALIZIA Construction Supervisor As Construction Supervisor, Mr. Malizia assigns construction phase projects to qualified staff in H2M's inspection department, and monitors the progress during the actual construction phase. He is responsible for construction inspection training, review of field procedures, performance evaluation and resolving construction problems. Mr, Malizia is also responsible for monitonng project schedules and budgets while maintaining H2M's standard of quality for disciplines that include general construction, architectural, mechanical, electrical, and structural engineering. Additionally, he manages submittal review, progress and cost control, and quality control, and coordinates owner/client meetings during construction. As Senior Construction Inspector, Mr. Malizia inspected many construction projects including wastewater treatment plants, pump stations, sanitary sewers, water mains, infiltration/infliltration flor monitoring; roadway regrading/repaving, drainage, bulkheading, and testing. He has worked directly with town, county and state officials. Mr. Malizia served as the resident inspector for the construction of the Riverhead- Southampton Scavanger Waste Treatment Plant, Huntington Sewage Treatment Plant upgrading and Scavenger Waste Pretreatment Facility, Village of Great Neck Sewage Treatment Plant upgrade, and the Oyster Bay Sewer District Sewage Treatment Plant upgrading and expansion. As Assistant Chief Draftsman, Mr. Malizia participated in diversified civil engineering projects for H2M, working closely with the project engineers. He completed design work for treatment facilities including Estee Lauder, Riverhead-Southampton Scavenger Waste and the Yaphank County Center, and prepared the contract drawings for pump stations, water distribution systems and related services to many water districts and municipalities. · 1/96 t-t:, _. GROUP PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C. (1987 - Present) EDUCATION New York State Water Treatment Operators School Construction and Technical Course Work, State University of New York at Farmingdale U.S. Navy Construction Engineering School (SEABEE's) CERTIFICATIONS Community Water Systems Operator, Grade 2B, New York State Department of Health Associate Engineering Technician in Underground Utilities Construction Water and Sewer Lines, National Institute for Certification in Engineering technologies (NICET) MEMBERSHIPS American Water Works Association Long Island Water Conference JOSEPH G. McGUlRE Construction Inspector/Surveyor As Construction Inspector, Mr. McGuire is responsible for inspection of test wells, permanent wells, water treatment plants, water mains, sewer mains, drainage, water tanks and pump houses; ak-stripping systems; and chemical treatment systems, He provides review to ensure compliance with contract documents and specifications, review of payment requests, and preparation of progress reports. He is also responsible for collecting specialized as-built data. Prior to construction inspection, Mr. McGuire was a surveyor responsible for horizontal and vertical control network surveys; boundary, title, topographic, planimetric, hydrographic, and aerial photogrammetric ground control surveys, construction stake out and horizontal and vertical control network extension. Mr. McGuire's experience includes: Incorporated Village of Bayville, Bayville, New York: Resident inspector on both Phase I and Phase 1I of the Godfrey Avenue reconstruction project which included construction of drainage facilities, new curbs, new sidewalks and driveway aprons, and asphalt pavement. Inspection of well and pump installation; air stripping facilities; chemical treatment facilities; numerous water main installations including all restoration of roads, curbs, sidewalks and driveway aprons; and building and site reconstruction for projects for numerous water districts. Kingsboro Psychiatric Center, Kingsboro, NY: Complete rehabilitation of the 70 year old storm and combined sewer systems. Topographic and partial utility survey and computer design for the computer design of excavation and removal of old drainage lines totaling 15,000 linear feet. · Sea Watch Condominiums Boundary Survey and Wetlands Delineation. · Riverhead Master Plan Photo Control. In addition to his experience at H2M, Mr. McGuire was also Assistant Superintendent of a Long Island water district, supervising the daily operations of the meter, maintenance and operations department. · 1/96 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Holzmacher, McLendon & MurreH, P.C.,(I@5~-t 964, 'r997-Pmsent) EDUCATION A.A.S, Business Administration, State University of New York at Farmingdale CERTIFICATION Certified Health and Safety Operations at Hazardous Waste Bites (OSHA) Management and Supervision Program, Amerada Hess Corporation LUKE J. ZABBIA Construction Inspector As a staff engineer, Mr. Zabbia is responsible for the design of mechanical and HVAC systems in office buildings, industrial facilities, schools, medical facilities, laboratories, and municipal and fire district facilities, and special use facility. Mr. Zabbia originally worked at H2M between 1958 and 1964. He was a field inspector working closely with project engineers. He has compiled over 20 years of progressive commercial construction experience with special qualifications in specification interpretation, project coordination, contractor management, construction administration and field supervision. Presently, Mr. Zabbia is working as a field inspector on a number of highly visible construction projects. They are: · Bethpage Water District Plant 5 Air stripper towers and building addition. · Bethpage Water District Emergency Generator installation with building addition. · North Massapequa Fire District Emergency Generator system installation. Prior to rejoining H2M, Mr. Zabbia was Senior Estimator for a general contractor, coordinating plans, estimates, bid proposals, documents, rebuilds, site development and remediation projects. He was also Senior Vice President and Office Manager for a construction company and construction and maintenance supervisor for a major oil corporation. His prior experience also includes working as a plan coordinator and structural draftsperson for a New York City engineering firm. · 6/97 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Holzrnacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C.,(1998-Prasent) Larry E. Tyree Co. (1995-1998) Unico Service Corporation (1992- 1995) Grumman Aerospace (1978-1991) CERTIFICATION Electrical I and II Authorized Records Expediter Health and Safety Operations at Hazardous Waste Sites (OSHA) Confined Spaces JEFFREY MUNZlNI3 Construction Inspector Mr. Munzing has over seven years experience in the design and inspection of construction projects. As a project inspector, he is responsible for construction inspection of office buildings, industrial facilities, schools, medical facilities, laboratories, municipal and fire district facilities, and special use facilities. Mr. Munzing works closely with project engineers and contractors, oversees site safety and quality control, and code requirements. His experience also includes specification interpretation, project coordination, contractor management, construction administration and field supervision. Before joining H2M, Mr. Munzing oversaw construction of gasoline stations and was an inspector of aircraft flight controls as well as pneumatic and hydraulic systems. He performed aircraft safety inspections and installation of aircraft components in accordance with specifications and interfaced with quality control personnel. · 12/98 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C.,(1998-Present) Larry E. Tyree Co. (1995-1997) Corbett Construction (1989-1995) W.F Brenan Construction (1991- 1996) EDUCATION B.S., Architectural Technology, New York Institute of Technology CERTIFICATION Health and Safety Operations at Hazardous Waste Sites (OSHA) WILLIAM BRENAN Construction Inspector-Architecture Mr. Brenan has over eight years experience in the design and inspection of construction projects. As a project inspector, Mr. Brenan is responsible for school construction, inspection of office buildings, industrial facilities, schools, medical facilities, laboratories, municipal and fire district facilities, and special use facilities. Mr. Brenan works closely with project architects, engineers and contractors, oversees site safety and quality control, and code requirements. His experience also includes specification interpretation, project coordination, contractor management, construction administration and field supervision. Prior to joining H2M, Mr. Brenan was the superintendent for general contracting of a major construction firm overseeing all phases of construction. His responsibilities included writing contracts, schedules, inspection coordination, overseeing all phases of construction including all grades, elevations and critical dimensions. His involvement in construction has been fi.om foundation to the finished project. I 9/98 I-'--I ., GROUP PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Holzmscher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C.,(1998~Present) Soil Mechanics (1994-1998) EDUCATION A.S., Business Administration, State University of New York at Farmingdale, College of Technology ,JOSEPH A. TROTTA Construction Inspector Mr. Trotta has over four years experience in the area of construction inspection. As a project inspector, Mr. Trotta is responsible for school construction, inspection of office buildings, industrial facilities, schools, medical facilities, laboratories, and municipal and fire district facilities, and special use facilities. Mr. Trotta works closely with project architects, engineers and contractors, oversees site safety and quality control, and code requirements. His experience also includes specification interpretation, project coordination, contractor management, construction administration and field supervision. Before H2M, Mr. Trotta supervised and inspected construction to meet building codes and job specifications for residential and commercial sites. I 12/98 ~K ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A HELD ON NOVEMBER 10, 1998: RESOLUTION WAS REGULAR MEETING RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby approves the amount of $3,96u,,216.00, for a requisite security for the roads and improvements for the site plan for PeconJc Landing at Southold, Inc. with an inspection fee of $237,852.96, all in accordance with the recommendation of the Southold Town Planning Board and Town Engineer James A. Richter. Southold Town Clerk November 10. 1998 Southold Town Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southo]d, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STAFF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING TO: FKOM: RE: DATE: Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent Edward Forrester, Director, Code Enforcement Ben Orlowski, Chairman, Planning Board Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner/~ Peconic Landing Site Plan N/s SR 25, 1139 feet E/o Sound Road Greenport, NY 11944 December 7, 1998 As per discussions between ourselves, the field inspection of Peconic Landing during the construction phase of this project will be contracted out to a qualified engineering firm. To date, the firm of Young & Young, the engineering consultants for Peconic Landing, have submitted two sets of drainage and elevation plans for review by prospective firms. Those plans are in the Planning office. As of today, two proposals have been received by interested firms. More are anticipated soon. In reviewing these proposals, it became evident that we needed to decide who would be the primary contact person, who would oversee the timing of the engineering and building inspections and who would sign offon the timesheets and bills. Ed is the logical person to perform this role: and he has graciously agreed to be the primary contact and coordinator between the engineering firm and the Town. Therefore, with this memorandum, I am sending to Ed, the following information from the Planning Board's files: two sets of engineering (drainage and road profiles) plans two proposals as submitted by separate firms As new proposals are submitted to this office they will be copied to all three departments, but the originals will be sent to Ed for safekeeping. Once there is agreement amongst the three departments as to which firm will be retained, Ed will be responsible for working with the Town Attorney to draft a contract for signature by the consultants and the Town Board. After the contract is signed, Ed will oversee the coordination of inspections between engineering and building phases of the project. Ed also will keep Ray informed of the progress of the engineering aspects of the project as needed. He also will notify other involved agencies where questions arise within jurisdiction of the Trustees or the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation. He will sign-off on all timesheets and billing statements prior to sending them to the Supervisor and the Accounting Department for payment. Cc~ Jean Cochran, Supervisor Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney John Cushman, Chief Financial Officer (giG) 727-2202 (..Gl6) 727-014-4. HOWARD W. ¥OUI~, Land .gmegm THOUA~ ~. WOL/~RT, Pmf~e~l E.~I~ ~I, IIIEI~I I:. ABRLiZZO, Leml g~e~' November 9, 1998 ATTN: Mr. Raymond Jacobs, Superintendent Town of Southold Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 PECONIC LANDING at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Jacobs: Enclosed are two (2) sets of the Site Plan, Sheets 1-8, last dated August 24, 1998, Sheet 9 dated September 17, 1997, for your use, as requested by Mr. Robert G. Kassner of the Southold Planning Office. We understand that these plans will be forwarded to outside consultants for proposals to provide inspection services during construction. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert TCW/dc End. CC: ~91r. Robert G. Kassner, Southold Planning Department Mr. Terry Lewis, USRC Mr. John Dussling, USRC Mr. John Capelli, ECCB 1998 Southold Town I O: I IlO I~lannlrlo uoara Prom: I ne Arcllltectural h~evlew (Jommlttee ~-'enolng Applications i nave peen asKea to prepare a summary pt penatna applications so we DOth Will De aware pt trletr status: P'econlc LarlalnQ, we nave Given conceptual approval PUt await an exterior tlnlSn scneaule tot each DUllalncl before tlnal approval iJzugas-~mltn winery, vve laCK eleVaJlons, floor plans, type aha COlOr rootlna, wlnaows, aoors ancl trim: tVDe. COlOr aha aeslcln pt stanacle as Well as promlsea photographs pt a similar structure in :5outhampton, HaY Hamor L~OIt L;IUDhOUSe. We await the Ah(L; chaC.~IlSt items ana PhtOtClr P~,~,S Ot the site. Unce trlese are in I~aRCl, we ask trle P'lannlncl I::loara start to, mesa ara omar application materials to our two mataDors on I.-isrter's islana rot their commentsl t~apnael vlneyaras, we await tlnal l~lans tot the DUlli~ln~ aha me items on the A~C cnecKl~S£. Jimbo i-~ealtv. When Mr, Gray met witr) the Committee in Auoust we asKea tot sketches ShOWln~l s~cle, root, lanascaplng aana Derms on the North ~oaa aha Hortons Lane. Port of ECWOt. Mr. LeJblein met with the Committee in June anti clescnbed his plans. We recommenclecl Duilain~ two smaller buildings rather man one bi~! one, We have hearcl nothin¢! since. Secretary $outhold Town Planning Board CRAIG SIRACUSA~ PE. REGIONAL DIRECTOR STATE OF New YOrK DEpartment of Transportation Veterans MEmorial Highway hauppauge, N.Y. 11788 JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN COMMISSIONER October 28, 1998 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Young and Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Your October 15.1998 Resubmission Peconic Landine at Southold Route 25. CJreenport Our Case No. 97-263 Dear Mr. Wolpert: This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject case number. The plans must indicate the appropriate county tax map number. The subject material will be reviewed by Mr. Dan Herlihy. He can be contacted at (516) 952-6020 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By IHOMAS F. OELERICH THOMAS F. OELERICH, P.E. Regional Traffic Engineer cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold ~ TFO:JH:JS OCT 199 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, .IR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCFIIE LATHAM, JR. RICIJ. ARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fmx (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 27, 1998 Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lewis: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 26, 1998: BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the bond estimate dated August 28, 1998 and to recommend same to the Town Board. The bond estimate is in the amount of $3,964,216.00, with an inspection fee in the amount of $237,852.96. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc, cc; James Richter, Engineering Inspector Terence G. Lewis, Sr., U.S. Retirement Communities RAYMOND L. JACOBi SUPERINTENDENT $OUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Fax (516)-765- 1750 J~ES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel(516)- 765- 3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski ' Re~ SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 BOND ESTIMATE for Peconic Landing SCTM #: 1000 - 35 - 01 - 25 As per your request, I have reviewed the bond estimate submitted by Young & Young for the above referenced project. Please note that several additional items have been added to the original estimate. Modifications have also been made to some of the unit prices listed in the proposed estimate. Unit prices were increased to conform with standards that have been adopted by the Planning Board. A copy of the revised estimate has been enclosed for your reference. At this time, I would also like to point out that estimates have not been prepared for the proposed sanitary sewer system. Will the Village of Greenport require the necessary contracts or bonds to ensure the construction quality of the sewer system? Does the Village intend to inspect the construction and will they take ownership of all or part of the system after its completion? If the answer is yes to these questions, it will not be necessary to include this item in the bond estimate that I have enclosed. If the answer is no, it will be necessary to do a comprehensive review of the proposed system and a cost estimate for this item should be added to the overall Bond Estimate. At this time, I would also like to recommend to the Planning Board that they request assurances and approvals from the Village of Greenport to confirm that the existing sewer system will not be adversely affected by any additional loading and effluent discharge generated from the approval of this project. Any and all required upgrades to the Greenport system that is a direct result of the proposed project should be made the responsibility of Peconic Landing. The new water supply for the project will be supplied by the Suffolk County Water Authority. It should be noted that the SCWA will require all of the necessary bonds and construction supervision required during the installation of the new water mains. CC: If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact my office. Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) RAYMOND L. SUPERINTENDENT SOUTHOLD TOP~,/HIGHWAy DEPARTMENT Fax (516)- 765 - 1750 JAMES A. RICHTER, R./ ENGINEER TOWNOFSOUTHOLD Tel (516)- 765 -3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOND ESTIMATE PECONIC LANDING at SOUTHOLD STATE ROUTE 25, GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK $CTM # 1000 - 35 - 01 - 25 AUGUST 28, 1998 ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE BOND AMOUNT 1. 1,500 L.F. SAW CUT ASPHALT PAVEMENT (State Rte.25) $ 3.00 $ 4,500,00 2. 69.4 ACRE CLEARING & GRUBBING 2,500.00 173,500.00 3. JOB DEMOLITION / REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES 75,000.00 4. 264,000 C.Y. ROUGH GRADING/UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 2.50 660,000.00 5. 103 EACH CATCH BASINS 2,500.00 257,500.00 6. 20 EACH LEACHING POOLS (10' Dia. x 7' deep) 2,000.00 40,000.00 7. 47 EACH CONCRETE MANHOLES (4' Diameter) 2,000.00 94,000.00 8. 9,551 L.F. 18" Diameter H.D.P.E. DRAINAGE PIPE 25.00 238,775.00 9. 2,778 L.F. 24" Diameter R.D.P.E. DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 83,340.00 10. 407 L.F. 30" Diameter H.D.P.E. DRAINAGE PiPE 35.00 14,245.00 11. 457 L.F. 36" Diameter H.D.P,E. DRAINAGE PIPE 40.00 18,280.00 12. 825 LF. 18" Diameter CAST IRON DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 24,750.00 13. 4 EACH ROCK DAM 5,000.00 20,000.00 14. 3 EACH ROCK HEAD WALL 5,000.00 15,000.00 15. I EACH PRECAST CONCRETE CULVERT 100,000.00 100,000.00 16. 3,156 S.Y. POND LINER (2' Compacted Clay) 15.00 47,340.00 17. 65,000 S.Y. FINE GRADING 1.50 97,500.00 18. 1,570 L.F. CONCRETE CURBING 10.00 15,700.00 19. 754 S.Y. CONCRETE SIDEWALK 30.00 22,620.00 20. 6,830 C.Y. 3/4" STONE BLEND or"RCA" 30.00 204,900.00 21. 14,500 TONS ASPHALT PAVEMENT 60.00 870,000.00 22. 3,500 L.F. EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES 10.00 35,000.00 23. 1,166 L.F. MASONRY RETAINING WALL 150.00 174,900.00 24. 500 EACH STREET TREES 200.00 100,000.00 25. 85,698 S.Y. TOPSOIL & SEED 2.00 171,396.00 26. 175 EACH STREET LIGHT 1,500.00 262,500.00 27. 1,340 LF. ROAD RESTORATION (Bailey & Atlantic Ave.) 5.00 6,700.00 28. 4,200 S.Y. MICRO SURFACING (Bailey & Atlantic Ave.) 1.20 5,040.00 29. 7,600S.Y. PEDESTRIAN PATHS 1000 76,000.00 30. 80 EACH STREET SIGNS 200.00 16,000.00 31. 2,223 S.Y. FIRE LANE 10.00 22,230.00 32 JOB TRASH PICK UP AREA 7,500.00 7,500.00 33. JOB MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 10,000.00 10,000.00 SUB TOTAL + 6% ADMINISTRATION FEE $ 3,964,216.00 237,852.96 *** NOTE: THIS ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE TOTAL $ 4,202,068.96 THE INSTALLATION OF THE WATER SUPPLY OR THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman V¢ILLIAM J. CREMERS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD ~',uJ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 22, 1998 Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Town of $outhold 53095 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Re: FOIL request of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. Dear Ms, Neville: Enclosed is the information requested by Theresa Elkowitz, Please be advised that the ten page set of plans may be reviewed at the Planning office. Sincerely, . S Site Plan Reviewer enc. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD -~,-,.., Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 1, 1998 Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Town of Southold 53095 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Re: FOIL request of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. Dear Ms. Neville: I am in receipt of the above mentioned FOIL request. Due to the large volume of information requested, and the cost of copying it, I wish to suggest that Ms. Elkowitz come to the Planning Office to review the file first. The Town does not have the ability to reproduce in-house, the many revised site plans in our files, on paper of a size approximating that of the original. Before obtaining estimates of the cost of reproducing the site plans, Ms. Elkowitz may want to determine the specific plans she needs. Sincerely, Valerie Scopaz Town Planner ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Valerie Scopaz, Planner ~ Elizabeth Neville, Southold Town Clef Foil Requests of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. 9/30/98 Transmitted is 9/30/98 foil request of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. Please respond to my office within five (5) business days. Thank you. Southold Town planning Board FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Theresa Elko~itz, Prc6&nt Hug° D. Freuden~hd (Rc(ird-1994) September 28, 1998 368 V~t,r~,n, Mmorial Highway Corem&, New York 1172,5 Td: (,516) 499-2222 F~x: (516) 499-5928 VIA CERTIFIED MAIl. - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Ms. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold NYS Route 25, County Route 48 (Middle Road), Greenport Dear Ms. Terry: In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, we respectfully request ail State Environmeatal Quality Review Act (SEQRA) documentation for the above-referenced project including, but not limited to: applications and plans submitted for review, environmental assessment form (Parts I, II and III, as relevant), lead agency coordination letters, determination of significance, any requests by the Town to the applicant for information relating to the environmental review and responses thereto, environmental impact statement (if any), finding statement (ff any). Thank you for your cooperation in responding to this request. Sincerely, FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUE~, ~ Prmclpal / '-~ ~ TE/ba Regional Traffic Engineer New York State Department of Transportation State Office Building 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788-5518 September 10, 1998 PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) NYSDOT Case No.: 97-263 Dear Mr. Oelerich: Enclosed are the following items: T.k,k~ (516) 727-2~0~ F~e~.~k [516) 7'27-01.4.4- four (4) prints - State Road Improvement Plan dated September 9, 1998 (Sheet 10 of 10), and one ( 1 ) copy - New York State Department of Transportation letter dated July 2 l, 1998. Please note that the enclosed plan addresses the comments pertaining to the Site Plan contained in your letter dated July 21, 1998. If you have any additional questions concerning this application, please contact TCW/dc End. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert CC: T. Lewis + 1 Print + Encl. J. Dussling + I Print + End. J. Capetli + 1 Print + End. CRAIG SIRACUSA, F~E. REGIONAL D] RECTOR STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPauGe, N.Y. 11788 JOSEPH U. BOARDMAN COMMISSIONER September 17, 1998 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Young and Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Dear Mr. Wolpert: Your September 10. 1998 Resubmissioq Peconic Landings at Southol~l Route 25. Greennort Our Case No. 97-263 This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject case number. The plans must indicate the appropriate county tax map number. The subject material will be reviewed by Mr. Dan Herlihy of my staff. He can be contacted at (516) 952-6020 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By THOMAS F. OELERICH THOMAS F. OELERICH, P.E. Regional Traffic Engineer cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold.~/~ TFO:JH:JS SEP 17 1998 Southold Town Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 10, 1998 Charles Cuddy, Attorney at Law 180 Old Country Road Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Peconic Landing at Southold Main Road, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Cuddy, As discussed at the Planning Board's work session on September 10, 1998, enclosed is the preliminary bond estimate submitted by the Town Engineer. I would be happy to review any or all of this estimate with you at your convenience. cc: Thomas Wolpert, Young & Young James A. Richter, R.A., Town Engineer RAYMOND L. JACOBS SUPERINTENDENT SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Fax (516)-765 - 1750 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel (516) - 765 - 3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski · Re: SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 BOND ESTIMATE for Peconic Landing SCTM #: 1000- 35- 01 - 25 As per your request, I have reviewed the bond estimate submitted by Young & Young for the above referenced project. Please note that several additional items have been added to the original estimate. Modifications have also been made to some of the unit prices listed in the proposed estimate. Unit prices were increased to conform with standards that have been adopted by the Planning Board. A copy of the revised estimate has been enclosed for your reference. At this time, I would also like to point out that estimates have not been prepared for the proposed sanitary sewer system. Will the Village of Greenport require the necessary contracts or bonds to ensure the construction quality of the sewer system? Does the Village intend to inspect the construction and will they take ownership of all or part of the system after its completion? If the answer is yes to these questions, it will not be necessary to include this item in the bond estimate that I have enclosed. If the answer is no, it will be necessary to do a comprehensive review of the proposed system and a cost estimate for this item should be added to the overall Bond Estimate. At this time, I would also like to recommend to the Planning Board that they request assurances and approvals from the Village of Greenport to confirm that the existing sewer system will not be adversely affected by any additional loading and effluent discharge generated from the approval of this project. Any and all required upgrades to the Greenport system that is a direct result of the proposed project should be made the responsibility of Peconic Landing. The new water supply for the project will be supplied by the Suffolk County Water Authority. It should be noted that the SCWA will require all of the necessary bonds and construction supervision required during the installation of the new water mains. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact my office1 CC: Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) RAYMOND L. JACOBS SUPERINTENDENT $OUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Fax (516)- 765 - 1750 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel (516) - 765 - 3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOND ESTIMATE PECONIC LANDING at SOUTHOLD STATE ROUTE 25, GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK SCTM # 1000- 35 -01 - 25 AUGUST 28, 1998 ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE 1. 1,500 LF. 2. 69.4 ACRE 3. JOB 4, 264,000 C.Y. 5. 103 EACH 6. 20 EACH 7. 47 EACH 8. 9,551 LF. 9. 2,778 L.F. 10. 407 LF, 11 457 L.F. 12. 825 LF. 13 4 EACH 14. 3 EACH 15 1 EACH 16. 3,156 S.Y. 17. 65,000 S,Y. 16. 1,570 L.F. 19. 754 S.Y. 20. 6,830 C.Y. 21. 14,500 TONS 22. 3,500 LF. 23. 1,166 L,F. 24. 500 EACH 25. 85,698 S.Y. 26. 175 EACH 27. 1,340 L.F. 28. 4,200 S.Y. 29. 7,600 S.Y. 30. 80 EACH 31. 2,223 S.Y. 32 JOB 33. JOB SAW CUT ASPHALT PAVEMENT (State Rte.25) $ 3.00 CLEARING & GRUBBING 2,500.00 DEMOLITION / REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES ROUGH GRADING/UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 2.50 CATCH BASINS 2,500.00 LEACHING POOLS (10' Dia. x 7' deep) 2,000.00 CONCRETE MANHOLES (4' Diameter) 2,000.00 18" Diameter H.D.P.E. DRAINAGE PIPE 25.00 24" Diameter ND.P.E. DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 30" Diameter H.D.P.E. DRAINAGE PiPE 35.00 36" Diameter H.D.P.E. DRAINAGE PiPE 40.00 18" Diameter CAST IRON DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 ROCK DAM 5,000.00 ROCK HEAD WALL 5,000.00 PRECAST CONCRETE CULVERT 100,000.00 POND LINER (2' Compacted Clay) 15,00 FINE GRADING 1.50 CONCRETE CURBING 10.00 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 30.00 3/4" STONE BLEND or "RCA" 30.00 ASPHALT PAVEMENT 60.00 EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES 10.00 MASONRY RETAINING WALL 150,00 STREET TREES 200.00 TOPSOIL & SEED 2.00 STREET LIGHT 1,500.00 ROAD RESTORATION (Bailey & Atlantic Ave.) 5.00 MICRO SURFACING (Bailey & Atlantic Ave.) 1.20 PEDESTRIAN PATHS 10.00 STREET SIGNS 200.00 FiRE LANE 10.00 TRASH PICK UP AREA 7,500.00 MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 10,000.00 SUB TOTAL + 6% ADMINISTRATION FEE *** NOTE: THIS ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF THE WATER SUPPLY DR THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS. TOTAL BONDAMOUNT $ 4,5OO.00 173,500.00 75,000.00 660,000.00 257,500.00 40,000,0O 94,000.00 238,775.00 83,340.00 14,245.00 18,280.00 24,750.00 20,000.00 15,000.00 100,000.00 47,340.00 97,500.00 15,700.00 22,620.00 204,900.00 870,000.00 35,000.00 174,900.00 100,000.00 171,396.00 262,500,00 6,700.00 5,040.00 76,000.00 16,000.00 22,230.00 7,500.00 10,000.00 $ 3,964,216.00 237,852.96 $ 4,202,068.96 LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Special Meeting NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 31 st day of August, 1998 on the question of the following: 4:30 P.M. Conditional final approval for the site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., on the north side of;Main Road (S,R.25), in Greenport. This application is to amend an approved site plan for construc- tion of 118 single family de- tached cottages; 132 apartment units; 24 unit assisted living center, and 32 bed skilled care center with supporting ameni- ties. SCTM# 1000-35-1-25. 4;35 P..M. - Planning Board resolution to the Town Board on "A Local Law In. Relation to a Temporary Moratorium on the Issuance of ApProvals and/or Permits for [~usiness Zoned property along the County Road. 48 Corridor in the Town Ot Southold". Dated: August 19, 1998 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN Dated: August 19; 1998 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett: Oriowski, Jr. Chairman 1X8/27/98 (273) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: Patricia C. Lollot, being duly sworn, says that she is the Production Coordinator, of the TRAV- ELER WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the no- tice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Traveler Watchman once each week for / ........................................................................ weeks Sworn to before rjAe this ........ ~.Z. ......... day of Notary Public BARBARA A, SCHNEIDER NOTARY PUBUC, State of New Y~ No. 480684~ Qualified in SuflolkCoull~ j Herman J. Miller Deputy CEO for Operations SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 (516) 589-5200 Fax No. (516) 563-0358 August 26, 1998 Robert. G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Town Hall, Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Peconic Landing at Southold Dear Mr. Kassner, I received a copy of a letter sent to you by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) concerning the above-mentioned project. Carol A. Farkas, an environmental analyst for the NYSDEC indicated in that letter that the Suffolk County Water Authority has not provided a commitment of water availability. That is not true. With reference to the Peconic Landing project the Suffolk County Water Authority has issued its standard letter of availability. This letter is a full commitment to supply water for that project. The language referenced in Ms. Farkas' letter is included to show that no specific completion date for the water main project has been agreed upon. J nope [rllS information cJeai's up ,=, ~y. uoul ,de~ o,,~, ,d,nu. If you o, ,,~uJd need anything further, please do not hesitate to contact me at 563-0203. HJM:dmm CC: Very truly yours, Deputy CEO for Operations M A. LoGrande, Chairman/CEO, SCWA C. Farkas, NYSDEC T. Wolpert, Young & Young AU6 1998 Southold Tow~ Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southo]d, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: Gregory Yakaboski, Town Attorney Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Proposed Site Plan for Peconic Landing Main Road, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 DATE: August 26, 1998 Please review the attached contracts for water and sewer between the Village of Greenport and the Greenport Development Corp. As you know, there is a law suit over the fees paid to Greenport and the refusal of Greenport to turn over these fees to the Suffolk County Water Authority which now owns the Greenport Water facilities. Given the legal situation, do you foresee any problems with the Planning Board granting conditional final approval on August 31, 1998. See draft resolution attached. Dave Kapell and Charles Cuddy can be consulted on this matter. I need to know the answer before Monday in order to prepare for the Planning Board meeting at 4:30 pm. Also attached for your review is a draft C & R which would apply to Brecknock Hall. US RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT 4° MARKETING .:o PLANNING 4. MANAGEMENT TRANSMITTALSHEET TO: FROM: Mr. Robert G. Kassner John Dussling COMPANY: DATE: Town of Southold August 21, 1998 ADDRESS: CC: Town Hall, Main Road Teny Lewis w/o attachments SENT VIA:: Southold, NY 11971 AiPoome Express for 8/24 delivery PMONE NDMBER: YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER: [] URGENT [] FOR REVIEW [] PLEASE COMMENT [] PLEASE REPLY [] PLEASE RECYCLE AUG 2 4 1998 Enclosed please find: Southoid Town Planning Board 1. A copy of the water and sewer contract for the Brecknock Hall property 2. Court order enforcing the contract 3. W'fll serve letter from Village of Greenport 4. Draft covenant controlling changes to Brecknock Hall This should satisfy the water/sewer contract requirement for site plan approval. You may wish to have the town attorney review these documents. THE GEORGETOWN BUILDING, 101 CHESLEY DRIVE, MEDIA, PA 19063-1761 This Declaration made and dated the day of July, 1998 by PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC., with an office at Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, hereinafter referred to as the "Declar- ant''. WITNESS ETH : WHEREAS, PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. is the owner in fee simple of certain lands located on the northerly side of NYS Route 25, Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 035.00, Block 01.00, Lot 025.000, and more particularly described on the annexed Schedule A; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of said approval, the owner has deemed it necessary to be for the best interests of the Town of Southold, the owner and the interests of the surrounding community that the within covenants and restric- tions be imposed on said parcel, and that the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's office. NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarant for the purpose of carrying out the intents above-expressed does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereinafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers and holders of said premises, its successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That the Declarant will preserve and maintain the external design of the structure known as Brecknock Hall, which is located on the property described in Schedule A. 2. That Declarant's efforts to preserve and maintain the character of the present structure interior renovation to provide for the structure. will not preclude exterior or the safe and efficient use of 3. That any substantial proposed change in the exterior Southold Town design shall be subject to approval by the Architec- tural Review Board.~ ~'~'~'~ 4. That the use of Brecknook Hall shall be determined only by the Declarant, its successors and assigns. 5. That the within Declaration can be modified only at the request of the owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall he entitled to notice of such public hearing, but their consent to such modification shall not be required. - 2 - SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK GOLDIE WOLOWITZ and BRUCE ~]OLOWITZ, Plaintiffs, - against - G~ORGE W. HUBBARD, STEPHEN L. CLARKE, JEANNE M. COOPER, DAVID S. CORWIN, DAVID KAPELL, WILLI~4 H. LIEBLEIN and GAIL F. HORTON, individually and as Mayor and Trustees, respectively, of the Village of Greenport, and THE VILLAGE OF GREENPORT, Defendants. Index No. 88-5731 Riverhead, New York November 2, 1992 Before : HON. ROBERT W. DOYLE, Justice A p_~ e a r a n c e s .: JOHN P. BRACKEN, ESQ. Attorney for the Plaintiffs RICHARD J. CRON, ESQ. Attorney for the Defendants RICHARD LARK, FSQ. Temporary Receiver SO-ORDeRED STIPULATION Patricia L. Fugelsang, CSF Official Court Reporter THE COURT: Let the record reflect that this matter is on my calendar this mornin~ and has been on my calendar on ntur. erous occasions wherein the plaintiffs have brought on a motion for contempt based u?on a stipulation of settle- ment which was entered into by the parties back in July of 1989. There have been numerous con- ferences amon~ the parties and the Court with a view toward reaching a settlement on this matter. It is my understanding, based upon conver- sations that we have had here this morning, that the village now is ready to issue to the plain- tiffs 350 certificates of availability with respect to the proposed condominium develoF~'ent which is the subject of this lawsuit. There has further been an agreement re~ched that the well, which the plaintiffs have caused to be constructed on the property, has been com- pleted, that the electricity to operate this facility will 'be turned on and that the facility will be examined by independent contractors who, I understand, were responsible for the construc- tion or design of this well. In the event that there are any necessars' repairs as well as e~eration problems, it's re,re sented by the plaintiffs that they will cause to have the well repaired at their expense for the benefit of the village. Eased upon this agreement, I'm going to So Order this further stipulation of settlement and it is now incorporated and made part of the original stipulation of July 21, 1989. Upon the issuance of the letters of avail- ability and the acceptance of the well by the village, stipulation of discontinuance will be entered into by and between the parties. MR. CRON: They will discontinue the con- tempt proceedings with prejudice against the village. MR. BRACKEN: ~nd the village will with- draw its opposition at the same time. Wi~h respect to clarity in this matter,' it's my understanding that it is the order of this CourtS'hat the ¥illa~e is to forthwith grant and issue letters of availability for 350 units. 'THE COURT: Yes, that's the direction of this Court. So Ordered. MR. CRON: There is one other thing still remaining and that is that the plaintiffs, their successors and assignees will execute the neces- sary dedication and easement papers for the village to take over title'search on this parties are. ~R. LARK: the well. I have to run a to be sure who the necessary I re~resent to the Court that has been done and it's been fully executed and has been'in counsel's hands since June of this year. Now he wants to run a title search, which is fine, and he can do anything else he wants to do. I have an Order of Judge Cohalan authorizing me to enter into such an agreement and I so reFre- sent. SO ORDERED. )a ted: November 5, 1992 GOLDIE WOLOWITZ 'and BRUCE WOLOWITZ, d/b/a GREENPORT DEVELOP~NT .CO. Plaintiff, . - against .. ..~.:'~ : .,~.'., ... .~ : '_..'. ~ -~ Index No. 88-5731 · :.. : STIPLTLATION GEORGE W~ HUB~L~RD; 'STEPHEN L.' CLA3~KE, O-EA/TNE ~. COOPER, DAVID S.. CORWIN, .... . DAVID ~kPELL, WILLIAM.H. LIEBLEIN, and GAIL F. HORTON, individu, al!y and as . . . .... ~ayor 'and Trustees respectively of the ' VIT.TLAGE OF GREENPORT, and THE VIT.T.AGE . ~ ...... OF~ GREE~ORT,;'"~ ' :~ ~ ..... ~ ~'" : ' Defendant ...... . ........... · .~ ,.. IT IS EEP~EBY .STIPD-LATED A/~D AGP2EED, .by.and between the pa~-Eies and their respective attorneys as.. follows :L. 1. The above-entitled, action bearing index no. 88-5731 shall be discontinued without ·costs and with .... prejudice by all parties. :, i-.,'.~:,;",'? ''~ '.'. ~...:<. -.':' - ...... "~ ""'" ' ii 2. The contract dated 7th day of ~arch.1986'is '::declared to be in fulll, force.and effect subject.to the terms of this stipulation, and all parties waive.any, and all .. ·.. claims for alleged breaches of contract to date of this ~ 's tipul ation'. ~':'".' :v.'.'.'~::'"'~ ~.. ~ ' "::"' : '" ' ' ' ' '3. WOLOWITZ shall complete the public water s ply system and appurtenances in conformity ~ ." WOLOWiTZ necessary to the development of .the publ. ic water !:supply shall be credited uo WOLOWITZ,s financial obligations pursua~tO the terms It is under~tood that responsible bidder. of the contract dated March 7, 1986. all work will be awarded to the lowest Upon completion of the facility, it shall be dedicated to the village together with.any easements necessary for operation and maintenance. WOLOWITZ sha~l' 0~ain all necessary approvals from all agencies no later th~n Septera~er 1, 1990. 4. Par'agraph 11 .o.f the agreement, shall be modified to the extent that the first sentence thereof shall b~' d~le%¢d and the following shall be substituted .therefore: a.. The V~I,T,AGE shall issue a letter o.f.... .~,*? ~* ~.' **...,,,,~ ..,..-. ~*..!* -**:*~.*::~'*~' -. . . , - * . . -. avaiiab~lity of sewer and water for fifty (~0) dwelling uni:s and a conmunity building within ten (10) .days. of the execution and filing of this stipulation of settlement. No certificates of occupancy shall be requested prior to · ;~ :.'~'~ * . *. .... · · . . Sept~-~er 1, 1990, with the exception of the community * !i building and :he four model homes. b. The VILLAGE Shall issue a letter of a~ai~biltty"on'or after June 1, 1990 for the availability i. of water and sewer for an additional one hundred twenty-five ':i (125) dwelling units. No certificates of occupancy, for .the :, one ~u~dred twenty-five (125) units shall be requested · ,until after April 1, 1991. .. c. The VIT.T.AGE shall issue a letter of i~avatlability on or after June 1,.1991 for the availability i!of ~a~"and 8ewer for an additional one hundred:.(100) ...: i.dwelling units. No certificates of occupancy for the one hundred (100) units'shall be requested until after April 1 availability.on or after January 1, 1992, for the availability of'water and sewer for seventy;five (75) dwelling units.'No'certificates'of occupancy for the seventy-five.shAll'be requested until after May 1, 1992. certificates of' occupancy shall be deemed to be 'c'Umulacive, so-t~at' an~ ~hit~i!for"which "letters' of"av~ilabi~i~y and/or certificates"oS b6cupanc~ are' not' [ssu~d'[ "'or h~vi~ beeh ' issued are ~o~'~Used~'are' ad~ed ~n t~ any'subseq~eht period or~eM'i6~g:as~'se~:fo~th kerei~ and"are 'not dee~ed'to'be'~lost ~--,'..-: .:i, f. In the event the VILLAGE in its sole Judgement dete~-miHeW%~a% the VIT,T.AGE has' sufficient water and:~ewer'~apac~t~,.:.~he'V/nt~AGE agrees ~o 'issue letters of ava~lability'.pfio~t6 '{he scheduled dates'set forth herein. :~'. ".-':'. :.'5;LTh~'~VIT~.~GE.represents'tka~ it'eith~ now has sufficlent'c~pA~ity ~ngits'sewage system or. that it will have sufficient 'capacity in the futur~ to' provide hook-ups toythe municipal'sewerage system.. Village' makes this representatfon:kno~ing-'that WOLOWITZ will rely thereon ~n executing~this'~tipulation'and further ~_~owing that the availability of sewage connections is necessary and essential in order to permit WOLOWITZ to develop the subject p~rcel. 6. Payments to the VIT.T.kGE pursuant to the tezms of the contract shall be come due upon issuance of the building permit and certificate of occupancy but shall not become due upon the issuance of the letter of availability. - : : 7. The sti~ulation and underlying agreement dated March 7, 1986 shall be. binding on both parties and inure to the benefit of both parties and their assigns and\or · Successors. .":' :. r~". '~ ' ~''' 8.. : Upon ;the execution of this stipulation by' both II.'..'parties and the ~on.Rober~ W. Doyle, Justice of the Supreme ~ourt., the preli~i~arY.in~unction in effect.by order dated april/10 ~.1989 is hereby dissolved and surety bond number J6i12487 issued by'Fidelity.and Deposit Company of Maryland i the amount.of $500,000.00 is and the s~me is hereby released. 9. The VILI.%GE agrees to execute and deliver letters of availability of sewer and water and both parties agree to execute and deliver any other documents necessary to effectuate this stipulation of settlement and the contract dated March 7, 1986. 10. In the event of any disputes as to the agreement or the stipulation of' settlement, the parties agree to submit the matter to the ~onorable Robert H. Doyle for hearing and determination.'. 11. This stipulation of settlement shall be so ordered. Dated: Riverhead, New York ~fNZEL, ESQ. or Defendant ~Martin' Ashare, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CO. STAT~ OF NEW YOP~K) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ss.: On the~/~ay of July, 1989, before me personally c GEORGE W. H'OBBARD, to me kno~rn, who, being duly s~orn, d! depose and say that he resides at No. 178 Central Xvenue, Greenpor%, New York 11944; that he is the Mayor of the Incorporated Village of Greenport, the municipal corporat described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he kno~$ the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said inst~xnnent is such corporate seal; that i was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, ~nd that he signed his name thereto by like order. STATE OF NEW YORK) 'COUNTY OF NASSAU ) NOTAblY PUBLIC On the /~ day of July, 1989, before me personally ca: GOLDIE WOLOWIT% to m.e know'n, who being by me duly sworn, depose and say that she resides at 100 Great Neck Road, Neck, New York; that she is a partner in Greenport Develop~ Co. a co-partnership; that she has read the foregoing Stipulation and knows the contents thereof. and that she sic. .her name thereto as a partner in. ~ t he~ ~ ~ N~,~ C~ ' . . ~ILLI~M O. ~OLS¢ / CLER~ OF SUFFO[~,~ 'i .! December 17, 1992 LBV Properties, a Partnership c/o Bracken and Margolin, Esqs. One Suffolk Square Islandia, New York 11722 RE: LETTERS OF AYAILkBILIT~ "BREAKERS AT ISLANDS END" Dear Sirs: In accordance with the provisions of the water supply and 'sewerage agreement dated March 7, 1986, the 'so ordered" stipulation of the parties dated July 2!, 1989, and the settlement placed upon the record on November 2, 1992, to be "so ordered" by the ~on. Robert B- Doyle, Justice of the Supreme Court, the Village of Greenport does hereby advise that it ehall make available for your project water and sewer ~or 350 dwelling units under the Town of Southold approved site plan know as the "Breakers at Islands End," Creenport, To~n of Southold, New York. Very truly yours, William R. Pall, III Mayer WRP:lmc Oq-OS-g5 05: 18P~ POO2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant above-named has executed the foregoing Declaration the day and year first above-written. PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. By: William G. Thompson, President STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) On the day of July, 1998, before me personally came WILLIAM G. THOMPSON, to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at Main Road, Bridgehampton, New York, and that he is the president of Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation; and that he signed his name thereto by like order. Notary Public - 3 - SCHEDULE A ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the~ildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and~e~ng at Greenport, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and6~te of New York, and more particularly bounded and described as ~ws: BEGINNING at ~A - 4 - EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS INDENTURE made on the between LBV PROPERTIES, a new York partnership, with address at 200 La Bonne Vie Drive, East Patchogue, NY part, and THE INCORPORATED corporation having its office 236 Third Street, Greenport, NY WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Greenport Development Co. have heretofore entered into a Water Agreement dated March 7, 1986, Settlement dated July 21, 1989, 11772, party of the first VILLAGE OF GREENPORT, a municipal and principal place of business at 11944, party of the second part. and the village of Greenport Supply and Sanitary Sewage and Court ordered Stipulations of and November 5, 1992, and pursuant to same there has been constructed a water well known as Well No. 9-1, along with three monitoring wells as required by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Permit No. S-76772); a pump house with associated pumping and monitoring equipment and an eight (8) inch water main running from the well and pumping station to the water main of the party of the second part located on State Route 25; and electric line from Long Island Lighting Company to the pumping ST station; and 0 WHEREAS, the party of the second part has passed a resolution to CT accept dedication of the Water Supply System subject to the executio~ '00of acceptable and approved documents: DCK NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the )0 agreement dated March 7, 1986, and the SO ORDERED stipulations of ~ settlement dated July 21, 1989, and November 5, 1992, it is mutually )OOagreed as follows: 1. The party of the first part grants to the party of the second part, its successors and assigns, an easement in perpetuity over the property which is described in Schedule A, for the purposes of: taking amd using water for municipal ~urposes from the existing well (Well No. 9-1) located on the property described in Schedule A, and transmit same through the water mains in said property to the water mains owned by the party of the second part along New York State Route 25; with the additional right to enter upon the property described in Schedule A to repair and maintain the well, water maims leading to and therefrom, operating and maintaining a water supply well and monitoring wells, including but not limited to those shown on attached survey of Haubenreich & 8406-492S, dated June 18, 24, 1992, and December 8, 1993, including but not limited to the activated carbon (GAC) filtration and/or pesticides when required the Village of Greenport amd/or as a means of protection of the public whenever necessary for the operation of the water mains of the party of the second part. McDaniel, Licensed Land and City Surveyors 1992, with additional information added June pump station and related equipment, installation of a permanent granular system for the removal of herbicides by the Superintendent of Utilities of the Suffolk County Health Department water supply system, and water system to other part, its successors and assigns, property described in Schedule B The party of the first part grants to the party of the second an easement'in perpetuity to use the for the purposes of maintaining the water Well No. 9-1. electrical service line to the pump house and 3. The party of the first part grants to part, if, as amd when LBV Properties, its the party of the second successors or assigns, constructs and completes a sanitary sewage system in accordance with the provisions of the Water Supply and Sewage Agreement dated March 7, 1986, the right to maintain a sanitary sewage line, all necessary ~aterals thereto, and sanitary lift station on and over the premises described in Schedule B, together with the right of ingress and egress over and across such property, inso far as such ingress and egress is necessary to repair and maintain the sewer line and sanitary lift station. 4. The party of the first part grants to the party of the second part an easement in perpetuity for ingress and egress over the property described in Schedule C for the purpose of gaining vehicular access to water wells and pumping station located on the premises described in Schedule A. Until such time as the roadway known as "Rodeo Drive" is constructed, the party of the first part grants to the party of the second part a temporary easement for the purpose of ingress and egress to the property described in Schedule A over the dirt road indicated on the survey attached hereto as Schedule D, crossing portions of the premises described in Schedule A. Upon the construction of the roadway known as "Rodeo Drive," in accordance with Town of Southold highway specifications approved by the Southold Town Engineer of Highways, as shown on the survey annexed as Schedule D, the party of the first part grants to the party of the second part ah~ easement in perpetuity for ingress and egress by vehicle and by foot, over said constructed roadway known as "Rodeo Drive" to and f~om the lands described in Schedule C annexed temporary easement herein granted over described shall be extinguished. hereto, at which time the the dirt road hereinabove 5. Said easements and rights-of-way are not exclusive; however, no other poles, cables or lines are to be set within seven feet of either side of any water main laid within the easement area. 6. The party of the second part shall guard adequately all excavations made pursuant to this grant and shall save harmless and indemnify the party of the first part from any injury to its property, its employees or the public which may at any time occur or arise out of negligent installation, operation, maintenance or removal of facilities pursuant to this agreement. 7. The parties agree not to erect or maintain within the easement area any building, structure, or physical obstruction, of any kind or nature whatsoever or permit the same to be so erected and maintained, except such as described in paragraph #1 hereinabove, and such other improvements as related to the pumping of water or maintaining the proposed sanitary lift station, and repair of electric lines which serve the pump station, Well No. 9-1 and the sanitary lift station to be built. 8. A survey showing the location of the easements, Water Well No-' 9-1, existing monitoring wells, pump station, electric line and proposed sanitary lift station, prepared by Haubenreich & McDaniel, Licensed Land & City Surveyors 8406-492S, dated June 18, 1992, with additional information added June 24, 1992, and December 8, 1993, is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Schedule D. 9. The party of the first part,its successors and assigns, shall give written notification by certified mail,return receipt requested,to the party of thesecond part,at least ten(10) days prior to the party of the first.part,its successors and assigns placing any fill or dumping any material on said property and in particular in the area of said property previously excavated,and the party of the second part shall be given the opportunity to inspect any fill or material to be placed upon the property or in the excavated area. 10. The premises affected by this Easement Agreement is described in a deed to LBV Properties from Terrance P. Buckley,Esq.,as Referee, dated November 19,1992,and recorded November 30,1992,in Liber 11580 cp 329. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. LBV PROPERTIES Am'old Wolowitz,~ener~Partner INCORP'ORATED VILLAGE OF GREENPORT D~id~.~{apell, Mayor STATE OF NEW YORK) )ss: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On the ~9 day of ~/~)~ , 1994, before me personally came ARNOLD WOLOWITZ, to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument, and who, being duly sworn by me, did depose and say that he is a member of the firm of LBV PROPERTIES, a partnership, and that he executed the foregoing instrument in the firm name of LBV PROPERTIES and that he had authority to sign the same, and acknowledged that he executed the same as the act and deed of said firm. STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) No. ~"48~69~9 / On the /~ day of ~_~.~x~ , 1994, before me personally came DAVID~KAPELL, to me ~own, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at 143 Sixth Street, Greenport, New York; that he is the Mayor of the INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF GREENPORT, the municipal corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal so affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order the board of trustees of said corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like order. Notary Public EIL~'L:N V;,~-I WART N0tau Pub~,, $~e of N~w Yod~ N~ ~7~14 CommOn ~ ~ ~ I~ / DESCRIPTION OF PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT All that certain piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being at Greenport, Town of Southoid, County of Suffolk, State of New York, being bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of NYS Rte. 25, located ?228.25 feel westerly, as measured along the northerly side of NYS Rte. 25, from the point of intemectlon of the northerly line of NYS Rte. 25 with the common line between the Land Now of Islands End Golf and Country Club, Formedy of H. Dwight Ripley, and the Land Now or Formerly of Greenport Development Co, Running thence from this point of beginning South 66 degrees 36 minutes 40 seconds West along the northerly side of NYS Rte. 25.20,00 feet; thence North 23 degrees 23 minutes 20 seconds West, 592.50 feet; thence North 68 degrees 36 minutes 40 seconds East, 287.67 feet; thence North 01 degree 36 minutes 40 seconds East, 154.19 feet to a point on a curve; thence westerly and northerly along a curve bearing to the right having a radius of 200.00 feet for the arc length of 307.36 feet, with a chord bearing and distance of North 25 degrees O0 minutes 55 ' seconds West, 278.00 feet; thence North 68 degrees 22 minutes 36 seconds West, 560.19 feel; lhence North 24 degrees 37 minutes 24 ~econds East, 30.n0 feet; thence South 68 degrees 22 minutes 38 seconds East, 561.08 feet to a point on a curve; thence northerly, easterly, southerly and westerly along a curve bearing to the right having a radius of 200.00 feet for the arc length of 888.16 feet, with a chord bearing and distance of South 25 degrees 09 minutes 47 seconds East, 318.53 feet; Ihence South 01 degree 38 minules 40 seconds West, 165.33 feet; thence South 66 degrees 36 minules 40 seconds West, 286.78 feet; thence South 23 degrees 2~ minutes 20 seconds East, 562.50 feet to the northerly side of NYS Rte. 25 and the point or place of BEGINNING, SCHEDULE DESCRtPTION OF 30 FOOT WiDE PERMANENT UTllLI'FY EASEMENT All that certain piece o~' parcel o! land situate, lying and being at Greenport, Town of Southold, County o1' Su[folk, State oi' New York, being bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of NYS Rte. 25, located 81g.76 feet westerly, as measured along the northerly side of' NYS Rte. 25, l'rom the point of intersection of the nodherly line ol' NYS Rte. 25 with Ihe common line between the Land Now o1' Islands End Golf and Coun{ry Club, Formerly of H. Dwighl Ripley, and the Land Now o~' Formedy of Greenport Development Co. Running thence from this point of beginning South 65 degrees 23 minutes 50 seconds West along the northerly side oi' NYS Rte. 25, 30.13 feel; thence North 19 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West, 676.89 t'eet lo a point on a curve; thence easterly along a curve bearing to the left having a radius of 200.00 feet for the arc length of 30.13 feet, with a chord bearing and distance of North' 75 degrees 29 minutes 39 seconds East, 30.10 feet; thence South 19 degrees 16 minutes 0O seconds East, 671 ,Sg feet to the northerly line or' NYS Rte. 25 and the point or place at' BEGINNING. SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION OF 15 FOOT WIDE PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT All that certain piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being at Greenpod, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, being bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side or' the proposed Rodeo Drive, located by running the following five (5) courses and distances from a point lying in the northerly line of NYS Rle. 25 at its intersection with lhe common properly line between the Land Now of Islands End Golf and Country Club, Formerly of H. Dwight Ripley, and the Land Now or Formerly of Greenport Development Co.: 1) South 66 degrees 01 minutes 20 seconds West, 400.20 feet along the northerly line of NYS Rte. 25 to a point of curvature; the next four (4) courses and distances are along the westerly side of said proposed Rodeo Drive, 2) Easlerly and Northerly along a curve bearing to the lei't having a radius of 30.00 feet for the arc length of 44.33 feet to a point of tangency; 3) North 18 degrees 38 minutes 42 seconds West, 277.34 feet to a point of curvature; 4) Northerly along a curve bearing to ~he lell having a radius or' 210.00 feet for the am length of 97.13 feet to a point of tangency; 5) North 45 degrees 08 minutes 42 seconds West, 144,00 feet to a point of curvature and the point of beginning for the parce{ herein being described. Running thence from this point of beginning, South 67 degrees 24 minutes 24 seconds West, 54.35 feet; thence South 80 degrees 35 minutes 39 seconds West, 57.74 feet; thence North 86 degrees 12 minutes 50 seconds West, 72.00 feet; thence North 6g degrees 18 minutes 05 seconds West, 75.69 feet; thence North 58 degrees 22 minutes 10 seconds West, 57.00 feet to a point on a curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve bearing to the lei1 having a radius of 200,00 feel for the am length of '15.22 feet. with a chord beadng and distance of North 41 degrees 14 minutes 28 seconds East, 15.21 feet; thence South 58 degrees 22 minules 10 seconds East, 53,02 feet; thence South 69 degrees 18 minules 05 seconds East, 72..03 feet; thence South 86 degrees 12 minutes 50 seconds East, 68.04 feet; Ihence North 80 degrees 35 minules 39 seconds East, 54.27 feet; thence North 67 degrees 24 minutes 24 seocnds East, 46.76 feet to a point on a curve In the westerly side of proposed Rodeo Drive; lhence Southerly, along said westedy side, along a curve beadng to the lei1 having a radius of 383.79 feet for the arc length of 16.11 feet, with a chord bearing and distance of Soulh 43 degrees 56 minutes 34 seconds East, 16.11 I'eet t(~ lhe point or place of BEGINNING, SCHEDULE ./ ./ ,~XES 5 T'~-IRU 9 MUST BE TYPED O NTED IN .13LA.C.K .LNK ONLY P R TO RECORDING OR FILING. '1'] SUI~:FOLK'COUNTY CLERK Nunflmr of pages ~ . . ;edal # :ct'lil'icnlc # 'riot CIf# Deed / Murl§age htstcumcnt Deed / Martgage Tax Slamp Recording I Filing StamllS ,1 [ FEES Page / Filing Fcc /c~ . Il udhllg Tl'-Sff4 Nolnliou EA-5217 (Stale) I~P.T.S.A. Cumin. of Ed. Affidavil Cc~ifled Copy Reg, Copy Othcc 5 . ..?..(. Sub Total GILAND TOTAL · .-":"'..~ ",~ Real Propet~y Tax Sen'ice Agency Verification Morlgage Ami. 1. Uasic Tax 2. SONYMA Sull 'l'olal 3. Spec.lAdd. TOT. AI'FG.'i'AX Dual Tuwn Dual Counly__ llchl for Aiumrliuumcut __ Tra.sfer Tax ~1 nusiou Tax The properly covered by lids mortu, age is or will he iml]ruvcd by n one ur I~vo family dwclli,,g uHly, YES. ur NO If NO, sec approprialc lax clsuse on page # of fids inst~mcnL Tille Company Information . .7; DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that LBV PROPERTIES, a New York partnership, with add~ess at 200 La Bonne Vie Drive, East Patchogue, NY 11772, party of the first part, and the INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF GREENPORT, a municipal corporation having its office and principal place of business at 236 Third Street, Greenport, NY 11944, party of the second part, have bargained and sold, and by these presents does grant, dedicate, release and convey unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, well No. 9, pump station, area fencing, and all related equipment as specified in: (1) i Specifications for "Plant No. 9 - Well No. 9-1 - Srecknock Hall, i":i Contract No. 1 - Mechanical Work, Building and General Construction - ' Project No. GNPT 89-09" dated January 1990 as prepared by H2M Group, Holzmacher McLendon & Murrell, P.C., together with Contract Drawings consisting of 9 sheets; and (2) Specifications for "Plant No. 9 - well No. 9-1 - Brecknock Hall, Contract No. 2 - Electrical Work - Project No. GNPT 89-09" dated January 1990 as prepared by H2M Group, i Holzmacher McLendon & Murrell, P.C., together with Contract Drawings !! consisting of 9 sheets, and together with the water' mains as ~T' delineated and set forth on the survey of Haubenreich & McDaniel, Licensed Land and City Surveyors, 8406-492-S, dated June 18, 1992, and ~T -- additional information added June 24, 1992, and December 8, 1993, ..annexed hereto and made a part hereof; all as located on premises ,of ~CK the party of the first part at N.Y.S. Route 25, GreenpOrt, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York,described in Liber 11580 cp 329Deeds. part, part TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the said party of the second its successors and assigns forever. And the party of the first does covenant and agree to and with said party of the second part, to WARRANT AND DEFEND the sale of said goods and chattels hereby sold uuto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, against all and every person and persons whomever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this dedication on the ~ day of /~7~z~jL , 1994. LSV PROPERTIES A~nold Wolowitz, Gener~artner STATE OF NEW YORK) )ss: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On the ~ day of ARNOLD WOLOWITZ, to me known to be foregoing instrument, and who, being , 1994, before me personally came the individual who executed the duly sworn by me, did depose and · say that he is a member of the firm of LBV PROPERTIES, a partnership, and that he executed the foregoing instrument in the firm name of LBV PROPERTIES and that he had authority to sign the same, and acknowledged that he executed the same as the act and deed of said ~8'5 TI¥~U 9 ~IUST BE TYPED OR P TED IN ~LACI,( INK ONLY PRI O RECORDING OR FILING. SUFFOLK COUNTY CLEILK 117127C663 abcr of pa§cs TORRENS al tl ificatc # :l Dccd! Mortgage Instrumeut Il %.¸ 5 O0 tge / Filiog Fcc andling 'dalton ~_-$217 (County) ~,-5217 (State) P.T.S.A. ~nnnt. of Ed. ffidavlt ertified Copy cg. Copy Iher RECEIVED ~'~ ~., IOO5 Tl'!.,riN S F'{:iF~, '..:; JF FC,',L}L Deed / Mortgage Tax Stamp 20¸ 31 ,07 ?*CD: -.:; :.: .. , FEES Sub Total GRAND TOI'AL Real Property Tax Service Agency Verification D/st Section {Block [P/o' Lot II Recording / Filing Stamps Mortgage Ami, 1. Basic Tax 2. SONYMA Sub To{al .I. Si;cc./Add. TOT. MTG. TAX Dual Town __Dual Couuly Held for Apporiioumcnl __ Transfer Tax F5 · Mauslon Tax The property covered by this mortgage is or will be inll;roved by a one or two family dwelling only. YES or NO If NO, sec approl;riate lax clause OU page # of tills instrument. Title Company Information THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING FIELD ON DECEMBER 20, 1983: WHEREAS, a pelillorl was heretol'ore filed with the 'Fawn Board of Town al: Soul}told by ...I~EgG~.QqF~'...~:~:!..~.~ ......................................... requesting a change, modificotlon and omendrnent al the Building Zone Ordinance ir~cluding Ihe Building Zone Mops tootle o parl fl'~e~eol~ by cha~9 "A" Residential "M" Light Multil~le lng from ....and..Ag¢ifult. ufal. ....... District Ia ......... R.eside.~¢e ............. District the properly described ia said petition, and WHEREAS said petition was duly re(erred to the Planning Board for its invesllgation, recommendation and report, and its reporl having bee~ filed with the Town Board, and thereafter, a public hearing in relation to said petition having been duly held by the Town Board on the ...... 9~:J3. ........ day of ........... .N..9.Y~..m.~.~.E .................. , 19..8.~..., or, d due delil~eralion hovlng been had thereon NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the rellet demanded in said petition be, and it hereby is GRANTED, AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this change of zone is subject to the taking effect of a resolution adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, subject to a permissive referendum which resolution authorizes the execution of a certain Amended Grant of Scenic Easement from Brecknock Associates to the Town of Southold. DATED: December 20, 1983. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD "JUDITH T, TERRY SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK WATER SUPPLY T~IS AGREEMENT made thin '7 between AND SA~ilTARY SEWAGE AGREEMENT day of March, 1986, by and a municl~al corporation havin~ it~ office and principal place of business at 236 Third Street, Gresnpert, New York 11944, hereinafter celled the "VILSAGE", and the GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CORP., at 53 Glen Cove Road, Greenvale, called the "OWNER". WHEREAS, the OWNER with principal offices located New York 11458, hereinafter WI~NESSETH~ is about tc commence s development known as "Breakers at Islands End", Greenport, Town of $outhold, New York, on its property, which it presently owns, by deed dated July 16, 1984 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on July 20, ].984 in Liber 9604, page 529, located on the north,fly side of Main Road, State Route 25, which ia more par- ticularly described in Schedule A which l~ annexed hereto; which involves the d~velopment and construction of! 350 individual dwelling units along with a recreational building, existing dwellings, buildings and accessory structures. The construction will requir~ the l,stallation of a water supply well, water'and ~ewage mains, fire hydrant~ and a sewage collection lift c station(e) on certain rights-cf-way and portions of the property as generally ~hown on the Preliminary Plan for Water Supply and Sanitary Sewage Systems prepared by Steven J. Hymen, P.E., which is attached I~ereto as Schedule B; and to connect the aforesaid water supply and sewage collection systems with the VILLAGE water and sewage treatment systems which are shown on Schedule C, in conformance with plane and specifications which will be approved by the VILLAGe, and as may be amended from time to time during the cour,e of construction of the project; and W}tEREAS, the OWNER is willing, st its cost and expense, to construct and install the complete water supply and sanitary sewage ay.toms which will include among other things, wells, water mains, hydrants, sewage mains, lift station(s), all of which will be merged with the water supply and sewage systems of the VILLAGE for the project called the "Breakers at Islands End" located on the premises more particularly desorlbed in Schedule A, and to transfer end convey same to the VILLAGE upon comple- tion, in whole or in part, and to give and procure easements for the maintenance of the wells, water and sewage systems, fire hydrants, lift station(s) and other secessary appurtenance~ for the proper operation of the aforesaid water supply and sewage collection systems; and WHEREAS, the VILLAGE is willing to supply the OWNER with its requested water allowances of approximately 200,000 gallons average daily flow and 2~0,000 gallons peak demand flow, collect the sewage from the project; and W~EREAS th~ OWNER represents based upon the engineering test 'report of ~olsmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C. (~2M) dated June 1S, 1984 that the primary water supply w~ll will supply as least two hundred (200) gallons per minute times fourteen hundred and forty (1440} minutes par day or a total daily gallonage ~apacity of two hundred eighty-eight thousand (288,000) gallons per day~ 'and WHEREAS, 'ditiona for 'systems and WHEREAS, the parties bays agreed upon the terms and con- the supply of water supply and sewage collection other matters as hereinafter set fort~. The parties understand that final approval of the development map 'necessary public authorities. agreement to assist the OWNER way of contractually assuring has not been received by the OWNER from all the The VILLAGE enters into this in securing such approvals and by to the OWNER e public water supply ~and sanitary sewage system if development~spproval is secured by the OWNER. NOW, THEREFORE, nants herein, it le in consideration of the premises ~nd cove- mutually agreed as follows, FIRST, The VILLAGE agrees to assist the OWNER lin securing all municipal approvals and permits and assuring to the public authorities a public water supply and sanitary sewage system to the OWNER'S project "Breakers at Islands ~nd", and the VILLAGE will be responsible for obtein~ng all permits from municipal for the installation end hookup of the water supply The OWNER agrees to install, at it~ own cost and the property described in Schedule A, a water supply authorities well(s). SECOND, expense, on system and a sanitary sewage collection system including, but not limited to, a water supply well or w~lla, water maine for.supply and distribution of water, and sewage maine and lift station(e) for the proper collection of sewage from the project es outlined on the attached Preliminary Plan for Water Sewage Systems prepared by Steven J. attached hereto as Schedule B. Supply and Sanitary P.E., which ia THIRD~ Ail necessary engineering aud construction for the installation of the complete water supply and sanitary sewage systems on the OWNER's property described in Schedule A will be referred to as the 'WORK", which shall be designed and constructed by the OWNER and/or its subcontractors. The WORK shall be in accordance with plans and specifications which are to be prepared by the OWNER's engineer, to be approved by the VILLAGE Engineer and Superintendent of Utilities in writing before the OWNER commences the WORK. ~owever, the design and engineering for the well field and the lift station(a), together with appurtenant structures will bm completed by ~olamacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C. (H2M;, Melville, New York. FOURTH~ All of the design, of 575 Sroadhollow Road, engineering and construotion work for the installation of sanitary sewage mains fro~ the connection at the OWNER's property, across and along State Route 2~, along Bailey Avenue, to tbs VILLAGE's existing oawega main on Atlantic Avenue, Greenport, New York, shall be tho responsibility of the -4- VILLAGE to perform and construct same. However, 811 costs incurred and msaociated with the engine*ring and constructloa of this off-site sewage line will be reimbursed to the VILLAGE by the OWNER. Reimbursement payments will be made by the OWNER within thirty (30) days of when billed by the VILLAGEr and said payments will be the VILLAGE's actual coat incurred. FIFTH~ A. The VILLAGE requires s charge for e~ch dwelling unit of TWO THOUSAND FIVE ~UNDRED SEVENTY ($2,5?0.00) DOLLARS for the hookup of a public water supply and a charge of TWO THOUSAND FIVE RUNDRED EIG~TY-FIVE ($2,585.00} DOLLARS per dwelling unit for the hookup of wastewater sewage services. Said charges sa received by the VILLAGE shall be placed in m 'Back Bone Plant - Reserve Fund" to be used for the following needs of the VILLAGEI well, ~lte production, transmission mains, storage facilities, plant site treatment, added wsstewster treatment plant, pump sta- tion, force and gravity mains, so aa to assure the OWNER of futura adequate water supply and a sanitary sewage treatment facilities, pursuant to a resolution of the VILLAGE Board of Trustees on July 18, 1985. Upon the execution of this agreement the OWNER shall pay the VILLAGE the sum of TWENT~ (20%) PERCENT of the aforementioned charges which is THREK ~UNDRED SIXTY TROUSAND EIGHT RUNDRED FIFTY ($360,850.00} DOLLARS. The balance of the aforesaid charges shall be paid aa follows~ TWENTY-FIVE (25%) PERCENT of the per unit fee then in force and effect at the time the OWNER applies for and receives a Building Permit for -5- dwelling units on the premises and the balance of FIFTY-FIVE (§5%) PERCENT of the fee for each dwelling unit at the time s request is mede by the OWNER for a Certificate of Occupancy from the Town of Southold. The actual money paid to the VILLAGE at the time of receipt of a Building Permit and the request for a Certificate of Occupancy (TWENTY-FIVE [25~] PERCENT and FIFTY-FIVE [§St] PERCENT respectively) shall be based on the current charges of the VILLAGE et the time of the request, as said charges may be periodically amended by the VILLAGE Soerd of Trustees after e public hearing pursuant to a recon~endation by the VILLAGE engineers. B. It is understood end agreed that the OWNER shall be entitled to a monetary credit for actual incurred by the OWNER, including design, construction costs in the development of costs end expenses engineering and the well or wells and accessory capital structures, excluding water mains, appurtenant thereto in the water supply system. At the time of the dedication of the systems to the VILLAGE, the costs of same will be sub- mitted by the OWNER to the VILLAGE's Engineer and Superintendent of Utilities for approval, sad the credit shall be applied on per unit basis at the time the OWNER requests a Certificate of Occupancy. The charges to be paid by the OWNER for the h6okup of water supply and connection of a sewage collection system for the accessory structures on the OWnER's premises as described in Schedule A, in their present usage, such as the recreation building, tennis courts, security guardhouse, maintenance building, stable, equestrian center, e~lsting dwellings, buildings, barns end other appurtenances,,Wlll be e~tabliahed by th, Superintendent of Utilities. The determination of these charges will be based on the use and water/sewage requirements of the structure to be serviced and a determination of the VILLAGE Superintendent of Utilities of said charges will set forth in Appendix 1 which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. If tbs VILLAGE allows any third parties to connect end uae the fac~lities of the lift station(s) or any force sewage main servicing the OWNER's property, the VILLAGE shall impose a charge upon tbs third parties based upon the percentage of load flow used by the third parties as la related to the total flow of the lift station(s) and/or force main. The percentage of repayment shall be in the same proportion aa the percentage of the third parties' flow is to the total flow of the lift station(s), end force main. 8aid reimbursement shall be paid on an annual basis over a period not to exceed ten (lO} years. Said monies shall be paid to the OWNER by the VILLAG~ within thirty (30) days of collection from said 8IXTH~ The VILLAG~ agrees to installations a~ shown on Exhibit third parties. supply fire hydrants for B. The cost of the fire the, hydrants, together with the delivery charges shall be paid by the OWNER who agrees to reimburse the VILLAGE et the VILLAGR's actual cost, which costs shall be submitted to tbs OWNER for payment. -7- The VILLAGE shall deliver the hydrants to the site at the time appropriste for the expeditious completion of the WORK, provided the VILLAGE Is given at least 21 days not~cs and subject to the availability of tbs hydrants from the suppliers to the VILLAGE. Until such time as the rental for the fire hydrants is paid for by the East-West Fire Protection District, the OWNER will pay to the VILLAGE such rental for each fire hydrant as ~s from time to time being paid by such District to the VILLAGE for other hydrents in the District. S~VENTE~ All WORK shell be inspected by the VILLAG~ which hereby designates its Superintendent of Utilities or his designee, with full power of inspection hereunder. The OWNER will grant access for ~urposes of inspection to all parts of the premises and the WORK. The VILLAG~ shall have an authorized inspector et the site st all proper times so as not to delay the WORK. No backf~lling shall be done until the ~lpe and the WORK in the trenches have been approved and tested or prior permission has been obtained from the inspector. The OWNER agrees to pay the VILLAGE's costs for all inspection fees charged by the VILLAGE, which costs shall be based on an hourly charge to be submitted to the OWNER periodically in advance of the inspec- tions. EIG~T~ A one inch service line shall bm installed to each dwelling unit and appurtenant structures under the direction and supervision of the VILLAGE, with a curb stop to be located at a place approved by the VILLAGE. NINT~ The VILLAGE will supply without charge to the G~NBR sufficient water to make all tests that are required by the VILLAGE, or any other governmental agency, for the installation, and approval of the water supply system and the 9anltary sewag~ system. TENTH~ The OWNER agrees, upon written approval Of the completed ~ORK by the VILLAGE and compliance ~ith all other pro- visio.s of this agreement, the O~NER will formally dedicate to the VILLAGE, and the VILLAGE will accept, the entire water supply/distribution system, and the entire sanitary sewage collection system. The OWNER shall execute such instruments transferring to the VILLAG~ all of its right, title and interest to the water supply distribution and sanitary sewage collection systems, including but not limited to the water wells, mains, lift station(s), appurtenances, frae and clear of all encumbran- ces and liens. At tho same.time, the OWNER will grant and convey to the VILLAGE easements and rights-of-way for ~he purpose of laying, relaying, repairing, operating, maintaining water supply well or well~, water mains, distribution system lines, sanitary sewage collection facilities and appurtenances, including domestic services and fire hydrants, and any other rights-Qf-way and easements, the VILLAGE needs or reqeiras for hookup 6f the systems to its other water mains and sewage mains. The aforesaid rights-of-way and eaagments shall extend five feet on either side of the water and sewer mains to be installed pursuant to this -9- agreement~ whether way. However, with manta shell be for or not such dimtan~e shall be within the road- regards to the water supply site(s), the ease- a two hundred (200) foot radius from the site of well point(s). The mains, appurtenances, easements and rights- of-way shall be granted to the VILLAGB, its successors and assigns, in perpetuity. The easements gra~ted herein are not exclusive; however, no other poles or cables ere to be sst within seven feet of either side of any water or sewer main. If ... utility, sewer or other services necessarily cross the water maine, the ~WNER will advise the VILLAG~ in writing of the exact location of such intersection, and upon installation shall supply maps to the VILLAGE showing the exact locations. Said intersec- tions shall not be permitted without the prior written consent of the VILLAGE, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. ELEVENTHI The WORK covered by this agreement shall be com- menced within one year from the date of this agreement and it i~ contemplated 350 units will constructed on the following schedulel 100 units within three years of date of this agreement, 125 addi- tional unite within six years of the date of this agreement, 125 units within nine years of the date of this agreement. The development of the recreational building, existing dwellings, buildings, end acces,ory ~tructures, will be as required by the OWNER. tion of done in If the WORK contemplated in this agreement for installs- the water supply and sewage collection systems shall be stages, it is mutu,lly agreed and understood that all -10- specifications and references to materials usmd for the construc- tion of said systems and the ~ORK to be completed thereon will be changed to conform to the than currant standards set by the VILLAGe. The VILLAGE will notify tbs OWNES of any changes from the plans and specifications which have been previously approved by the VILLAGE. Should the ~WNER desire to lay the mains or sewaqe collection facilities In sections, separate constr'uction contracts may be let if In the opinion of the VlLLAG~ Engineer and Superintendent of Utilities ~uch sections will provide for the proper water supply and .swage collection in conformance with the c~erall plan. TWELFTh! Upon completion, inspection and approval of the WORK, the Village ~hall operate the water supply system, the sanitary sewage collection system to the ~evelopment, and the individual owners of the units and buildings. The VILLAGE shall charge the rates applicable to all other such owners similarly situated pursuant to the rules and regulations of the VILLAGE in force and effect from t~me to time. T~IRTEENTM~ This agreement contains the complete understand- lng between the parties for the acquisition water supply and sanitary sewage collection hydrants hersinbefore de~cribed. The OWNER by the VILLAGE of the systems and fire agrees it will not make shy claims against the VILLAGE on account of the installs- tics of the water supply, wells, sanitary sewage system, other than as provided for in this agreement. FOURTEENT~I This agreement shall inure to the benefit and -ti- shall bind the respective heirs, legal representatives, suc- cessors and assigns of the parties. IN WITNESS W~EREOF, the parties have executed this agreement in four counterparts, all of which shall constitute originals, the day and year first above written. VILLAGE OF GREENPORT G6oO~m Bubbard, Mayor GR~ENPORT DEVELOPMENT CORP. STATE OF NEW YORK~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK~ On the day of March, 1986, before me personally came GEORGE ~UBaARD, to me known, who, being by ma duly sworn, did depo.e and say that he resides at /Tg c~ ~ Greenport, New York; that he is the Mayor of the VILLAGE OF GR~ENPORT, the municipal corporation described in and which exe- cuted the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal so affixed to ~sid instrument is such corporate ~eal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of trustees of said corporation, and that he signed bis name thereto by like order. COUNTY Not ~/~ y ~ublto N/~CY W. COOK Notary Public, Stale of N. Y. Sufklik County Na. 4735151 Tsrm Expires March 30, :1.977 On the ? day of March, 1986, before me personally came GOLDIE WOLOWIT~, to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, depose and ~ay that she reside, st 6 Park Drive East, Old we~tbury, New York~ that she is the Secretary of GRZENPORT -12- DgVSLOPHSNT CORP., thm corporation demorlb~ in mad which cured the foregoing lnmtrument) that mbt knowm the meal o~ maid cotporatlon~ bh~t the meal m~lxed to mmld lnmtrument lm much thereto by llke order. Cart fil,,d SCHEDULE A ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with buildings end improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, bounded and described aa followll BEGINNING at a granite monument set on the northerly side of the North Road at the southwesterly corner of the land now or formerly of ~. Dwight RIpley, being the southeasterly corner of the premises herein described; running thence along said northerly side of North Road, South 66' 01' 20' West 634.76 feet to land now or formerly of Schofield and McIntosh; thence along said land now or formerly of Schofleld and McIntosh, four courses and distances~ {1) North 11' 31' 10' Nest 210.00 feet; thence (2] North 19° 16' 00' West 344.00 feet; thence (3) South 65° 47' 10' west 213.37 feet; thence (4) South 19' 16' 00' East 550.14 feet to seid northerly side of North Road; thence along said northerly side of North Road two courses and distances! (1) South 65' 23' 50" West 285.49 feet; thence (2] South 66' 36' West 589.52 feet to land now or formerly of Time Structures Inc.; thence alonq said land now or formerly of Time Structures, Inc. four courses end distancesl (1) North 41' 39' 10" West 1084.54 feet; thence (2) North 65' 07' 50" East ]76.40 feet; thence (3) North 32' 28' 10" West 982.87 feet; thence (4) North 32' 57' 20" We~t 410.00 feet to the ordinary high ~ater mark of Long Island Sound; thence along the ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound seven courses and distances as follows~ (1) North 44' 12' 40" Eagt $64 feet; (2) North 25" 16' 40" East 398.12. feet; thence (3} North 58' 57' 20" East 601.09 feet; thence (4; North 42' 36' 50" East 169.85 feet; thence (5) North 57' 59' 40"East 188.68 feet; thence (6} North 41' 51' 20" East 322.22 feet; thence (7) North 31' 15' 10" East 483.72 feet to land now or formerly of F.F. King, Jr.; running thence along said land now or formerly of F.F. King, Jr., the following 14 courses and dlatauoeal South 30' 10' 40" East 910 feet; thence (2) South 31' 03' 40" East 300.01 feet; thence (3) South 28' 19' 30" East 89.61 feet; thence (4) South 13' 46' 30" East 33,68 feet; thence (5) South 27e 56' 50" West 65.47 feet; thence (6} South 0' 19' 40" East 179.94 feet; thence (7) South 1' 34' 00" East 300.20 feet; thence (8) 8curb 3' 40' 00" East i00 feet; thence (9) South 0' 04' 20" West 172.71 feet; thence (10) South 5' 18' 40" East 100.9] feet; thence (11) South 0' 39' 30" East 100.15 feet; thence (12) ~South 1' 45' 00" East 434.17 feet; thence (13) South 7" 02' 00" East 40.19 feet; thence (14) South 76' 49' 10" West 155.11 feet; thence along said land now or formerly of King and land now or formerly of Ripley, South 24' 34' 30" East 805.00 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Building or Facility ~harge ~ar~e.,, {To be ~ecified at time of'Bu~ldAng Pe~m~tl purguant to paraqrapl V~llaga of ~eenport ~eenpore Development Corp. ~KIg~O P~TF~S Trealueent Plant Cost eli6.bO/gal (design fl~ ~ gals ~r da~ ~r ~lli~ ~lt) ~ Stetl~ C~t 6r1¥| t4 I~lns TOTAL Pgbl~c ~ter 30~ ~lI Site Productton. 20~ Transmission Hains 355 Distribution Halns (Paid by Others) ]0/, Storage Miscellaneous On Site Treatment Per i)~lllng Unit TOTAL' $1,950 PO4J 318 POU 317 POU SI ,OOl Pou 668 POU $2,570 g property outside the Village In a special taxing dlstric% would far exceed the Engineers. recemaended Utility Costs NO~ THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED tha: the charges per d~elllng unit outside the ¥111age of Greenport for waste~ater service be $2,5~5.00 and the charges per dwelling unit outside the Village for public water be $2,570.00, and BE IT 'FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees have the Consulting Engineer revie~ these costs on a regular timely schedule, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the monies collected be placed In "Back I~le Plant - Reserve Fund" only to be used for the following needs: .~ter (1) ~ell Site Production (2) Transmission Hains (3) Storage Facilities and (4~ Plant Site Treatment ~astewater (i) ~Jded Treatment Plant (gl Pump Station (3) Force Mains and Gravity Hains. Adopted - duly [8, 1985 (09:[5} EffectlYe Date - duly lB, J985 (09:15) Village Board of Trustees Tek[,I..~ (~16) 727-2~02 I:,~]~ (~16) 727-0144. UOWARD W. YOUII(3, Leal TUOlaA.~ e. WOL~RT, K~I, II, IETU I~. ABRUZZO, La~I HAND DEL~ERED ATTN: Mr. Robert G. Kassner Town of Southold Planning Board Office 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Dear Mr. Kassner: August 25, 1998 Continuing Care Retirement Community PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) AUG B5 Southold Town Planning Board Enclosed are the following items: 1. one (1) set - Site Plan, Sheets 1-8 last dated August 24, 1998, Sheet 9 dated September 17, 1997; and 2. one (1) copy - Construction Cost Estimate dated August 24, 1998. Please note that the Site Plan has been amended to reflect certain changes to the proposed drainage system based upon input from the Southold Town Engineer's Office. If you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. TCW/nac Encl. CC: Mr. Terry Lewis, USRC Mr. John Dussling, USRC Mr. John Capelli, ECCB ATTN: Mr. Jamie Richter Southold Town Engineer's Office + I Set Prints + Encl. + 1 Set Pdnts + Encl. + 1 Set Prints + Encl. + 1 Set Prints + Encl. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE August 24, 1998 Peconic Landing at Southold at Greenport, Town of Southold, New York 1 Cleadng & Grubbing 69,4 Acres $2,000.00 $138,800.00 2 Excav,, Backfill & 264,000 C.Y. 2.50 660,000.00 Grading - Roads & Ponds 3 Fine Grading - Roads & 55,660 S.Y. 1.50 83,490.00 Ponds 4 4" Stone Blend or 6,830 C.Y. 30.00 204,900.00 Concrete Blend 5 4" Asphalt Pavement 14,500 TONS 60.00 870,000.00 6 Concrete Curb 1,570 L.F. 10.00 15,70~00 7 Catch Basin 100 EACH 1,500.00 150,000.00 8 Leaching Pool 20 EACH 1,,500.00 30,000.00 9A 18' Dia. HDPE 9,492 L.F. 20.00 189,840.00 Drainage Pipe 9B 24" Dia. HDPE 2,750 L.F. 28.00 77,000.00 Drainage Pipe 9C 30" Dia. HDPE 407 LF, 34,00 13,838,00 Drainage Pipe 9D 36" Dia. HDPE 457 L.F. 40.00 18,280.00 Drainage Pipe 9E 18" Dia. Cast Iron 825 LF. 25.00 20,625.00 Drainage Pipe 9F 4' Dia. Drainage MH 46 EACH 1,500.00 69,000.00 10 Topsoil & Seed 85,698 S.Y. 1.50 128,547.00 11 Lands~,oplng LUMP SUM 100,000.00 100,000.00 12 Demolition of Existing LUMP SUM 75,000.00 75,000,00 Structures 13 Pond Liner 3,156 S.Y. 10.00 31,560.00 14 Masonry Retaining Wall 1,166 L.F. 120.00 139,920.00 15 Erosion Control LUMP SUM 25,000.00 25,000.00 Structures 16 Concrete Sidewalk 754 S.Y. 30.00 22,620.00 17 Precast Concrete LUMP SUM 60,000.00 60,000.00 Drainage Culvert 18 Site Lighting - Roads & 153 EACH t,200.00 183,600.00 Parking Areas 19 Pedestrian Path 7,600 S.Y. 10.00 76,000.00 20 Rock Dam 4 EACH 5,000.00 20,000.00 21 Rock Headwall 3 EACH. 5,000.00 15,000.00 22 Signs LUMP SUM 10,000.00 10,000.00 23 Fire Lane 2,223 S.Y. 10.00 22,230.00 24 Trash Pick Up Area LUMP SUM 7,500.00 7,500.00 Construction Sub - Total $3,458,450.00 6% Inspection Fee 207,507.00 TOTAL $3,665,957.00 Z 470 335 779 US Postal Se~,ice Receipt for Certified ~ No Insurance Coverage Provided. Do not use for International Mail (S{ Sentta Jam ~eaicy Co. C/O Kontokosta Street & Number 43 West 54th Street New ?or~, NY ~0019 postage Z 470 335 623 US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided, Do not use for International Mail (See revers~ Sent to Thomas F. Hamilton Street&l~}u~n~I~r Palm Drive Post Office, State, & Z~P Code Aiken, SC 29803 Cerlified Fee Spatial Delive~ Fee Restricted Deliver/Fee Return Receipt Sl~3wing Io Whom & Date D~l~_llred Thank you for u~ing Return Receipt ~ervlce. you ~ ~ P4turn Receipt Send~e. 470 335 622 ~ervice t for Certified Mail :e Coverage Provided. for International Mail (See revers~ ~ & Christian Abadiot~ Avenue M ~tate, & ZIP Code ;lyn, NY 11229 I$ Lkis PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE of Public He, ring NOTICE IS HEREBY (~IVEN that pursuant to Article XXV of the code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing Will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road} SouthOld, New York in said Town on the 10th day of August, 1998 on the question of the following: 5:40 P.M: Public hearing for proposed site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc., in Greenport, TOwn of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-35-1-95. The property is bordered on the north by Long Island Sound; on the east by land now or for- merly of Floyd F. King, Jr.; on the sOutheast by landnow or formerly of John Abadiotakis and Christian Abadiotakis; on the smith by Main Rd. (N.Y.S. Rt. 25) and by land now or for- merly of Jerry H~ Schofield and Frank Justin Mclntosh; and on the weat bY land now or for- merly of Jem Realty. Co. .r,,~Dated: July 31, 1998 B.Y ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman 1 X-8/6/98 (250) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: Patricia C. Lollot, being duly sworn, says that she is the Production Coordinator, of the TRAV- ELER WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the no- tice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Traveler Watchman once each week for successively, commencing on the ..~2. ............ Sworn to before me this ........ .~. .............. day of ............ ..... Notary Public BARBARA A. $CHNBDER NOTARY PUBUC, State et New York No. 4806846 Qualifiecl in Suffolk Counly / Commi~i0n ~pJre~ e°/..~//9~ AUG l 0 Southold Town Planning Board NEW YO~K STATE Bernadette Castro Cornrnls$ioner New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preeervation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 Robert G. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 518-237-8643 August 5, 1998 Re: DSC/DOH/SSQ Peconic Landing/Lifecare Greenport, Suffolk Co. 98PR0237 Dear Mr. Kassner: Thank you for your letter of July 21st, by which you submitted the Phase iA archeological evaluation of the proposed Peconic Landing Lifecare Community project. Due to NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and NYS Department of Health involvement, the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) is reviewing this project in accordance with the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law, Section 14.09. The OPRHP had previously recommended that a Phase 1A/lB archeological survey be conducted for this site. The document prepared by Greenhouse Consultants is a Phase lA report based on literature and maps available but does not include the results of field testing on site (Phase lB). In the absence of field investigation results, we are unable to assess the impact of this project on historic resources. From information in our files, it is evident that "Brecknock Hall" is significant architecturally and by association with persons important in the history of Southold. Associated buildings, structures and landscape features related to th~ estate must also be considered in evaluating the impact of this project. Therefore, we will need current photographic documentation of all structures on the property. Original photographs should be submitted, keyed to a site plan. If you have any questions regarding this review, please call me at 237-8643, extension 283. S~erely,,~ ati°n (518) CC: Thomas M. Jung, R.A., NYS DOH Carol A. Farkas NYS DEC Region i (1-4738-01805/00001) An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency ('~ pllnted on recycled paper Date; 7/24/99 Ewing Cole Che~Brott To. Southold Town Hall Transmittal lndependenco Ma~ 100 NotCh 6th 9treat l:hiladolphia, Pennsylvania 19106-1590 215.923.2020 Fax 215.574.980'2 53095 Main Road Project: PECONIC LANDING Project No: 97012 $outhold, ~ 11971 We are sending you: Attn: Mr. Robert Kassner X Attached _Copy of letter _Originals XPrinta -- Submittals -- Product date -- Samples Change Order __Specifications __Other Re: Landscape Drawings Via/Federal Exoress Item Prepared by Description Code No. of copies J. Pinto Landscape Drawings Li through L11 Sou L ,hold T(~ wn ~ning B~ ard A Reviewed B Reviewed as noted C Rejected--see remarks D No further submission required E Resubmit F Resubmit for record purposes O Provide copies for distribution H For review I For approval K For your use L As requested Copies to: Capelli\File By: Charles Rudderow Direct Dial 215-625-4639 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATI-IAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 27, 1998 James Warren, Historic Preservation, Program Analyst NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Peebles Island PO Box 189 Waterford, NY 12188-0189 RE: Review of Archaeological Evaluation for Peconic Landing at Southold Lifecare Community Main Road, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Warren, An archaeological evaluation was sent to you on July 21, 1998, for a project called Peconic Landing. In my letter I forgot to mention that the Planning Board is planning to issue a determination of significance under SEQRA at it's meeting on August 10, 1998. It would be greatly appreciated ff you could complete your review and get back to us no later than August 6, 1998. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me at this office. Site Plan Reviewer CHIEF WARREN JENSEN 1sT ASST. THOMAS R. WATKINS Sr. 2ND ASST. WAYDE T. MANWARING TREAS. K LANGONI~ SECRETARY C. CAPRISE CHAPLAIN C. KUMJIAN Organized 1845 E.Mail - greenport-fd@juno.com (516) 477-9801 - STATION 1 (516) 477-1943 - CHIEFS OFFICE (516) 477'-4012 - FAX/MESS P.O, BOX 58 THIRD STREET GREENPORT, NY 11944 July 27, 1998 Mr. Robert Kassner Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing Dear Bob: This letter is to notify you that I have reviewed the maps dated May 21, 1998 for the above referenced project. At this time, I find that all the recommendations made by the Board of Wardens and the Chiefs of the Greenport Fire Department are so indicated on the maps for Peconic Landing. We would like to thank the Southold Town Planning Board and the representatives from Peconic Landing for their cooperative efforts to come into compliance with our requests for adequate fire protection. Warren Jenen~.//' ~ Chief WJ:cc Southold Town Planning Board Marketing Planning USRetirement Communities 'T'he Georgetown Building 101 Chesley Drive Media, PA 19063 1761 PHONE 610 627 2330 FAX B10 627 2320 July 24, 1998 Mr. Robert Kassner Planning Depamnent Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Bob, JUL 2 7 1998 Southold Town Planning Board I appreciate the time you took this afternoon to review the status of our site plan approval process and the schedule we will follow in the next few weeks. You indicated that the only two items we need for the public hearing to take place are a review and approval of our design by the Architectural Review Committee and a negative declaration on the S.E.Q.R.A. application. We are confident that our design will meet with the approval of the A.R.C. at the meeting next Tuesday. We appreciate your efforts to prepare a resolution for a negative declaration on S.E.Q.R.A. that can be voted on by the Planning Board the night of August 10, 1998, just prior to our public hearing, that same evening. If you send us the signs that need to be posted on the property and the letters which need to be mailed to the neighbors, we will take care of that at the same time you publish the meeting notices in the newspaper. This is a tight schedule and we appreciate your efforts in getting everything prepared in time. Sincerely, Project Coordinator JFD;jjm cc: Valerie Scopay New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 ~ SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (516) 444-0365 FAX: (516) 444-0360 P& John P, Cahill Commissioner July 6, 1998 Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Town Hall, Main Road Southold, NY 11971 JUL 0 8 1998 Southold Town Planning Board RE: NYSDEC Permit #1-4738-01805/00001 Peconic Landing at Southold Dear Mr. Kassner: The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation would like to take this opportunity to comment on issues regarding water supply to the referenced proposed development. As project manager, I requested documentation from the applicant that public water will be supplied to the site. The applicant submitted a copy of a letter from the Suffolk County Water Authority to the Suffolk County Department of Health, copy enclosed, which addressed this concern. However, the letter merely refers to the installation of water mains and is not a committment of availabilty, but implies water will be supplied if it is available at the time the work is done. Please be advised, there are historic problems regarding potable water in this area. Salt water intrusion both laterally and upconing are major concerns with any large capacity well in this area. In addition, the applicant has advised me that there are two wells at the site which may be considered as an option. However, the Water Supply unit in this Department has informed me that one of the wells is the property of Suffolk County Water Authority and there is no evidence of a second well. In the event it comes to light that there is a second well, this Department would seriously consider the impact of a second well creating a threat to an existing public water supply. Mr. Robert G. July 6, 1998 I have also requested that the applicant substantiate that the Greenport Sewage Treatment Plant is capable of handling the increased influent. As of this date, I have not received a response to my request. However, I will keep you apprised of my findings. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Carol A. Farkas Environmental Analyst CAF:cg enclosure cc: T. Wolpert/Young & Young Donald Siotnick Director of Distribution SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdate, Long Island, New York 11769 Area Code (516) 589-5200 April 29, 1998 Mr. Joseph H. Baler, P.E. Acting Director of Environmental Health Services Suffolk County Department of Health County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 Dear Mr. Baler: The proposed installation of eight (8) inch main in Easement Areas "A", "B", "C" and "D", and six (6) inch main in Easement Areas "B", "E", "F", "G", "H", "1", "J", "K", "L" and "M", as shown on Map of Life Care Community Peconic Landing at Southold, located in the Town of Southold, as prepared by Young & Young and dated September 17, 1997, is adequate to supply water for domestic and fire protection purposes. The Authority will undertake the installation of this water main under the terms of its standard Construction Contract, but such agreement has not yet been executed by the Authority and the developer. The time required for the completion of the proposed work is necessarily determined by the Authority's ability to obtain delivery of the required materials, easements for maintaining the mains in the streets that are private, weather conditions, and the existence of adequate supply works at the time the work is done. This letter of availability is not to be considered an Action by the Suffolk County Water Authority as defined by SEQRA regulations, and this response does not commit Suffolk County Water Authority to commence, engage or otherwise participate or approve an action where SEQRA is applicable until all aspects of the SEQRA process are complete and the Lead Agency has made a final determination and finding as related to the project. Very truly yours, Donald Slotnick, P.E. Director of Distribution c.c. E. Rosavitch .L. Anderson P. Ponturo BENNETT ORLOWSK/, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~,~ GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southo]d, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 6, 1998 Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747 RE: Review of amended part III Peconic Landing at Southold SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Voorhis, The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form Part III for the above mentioned project to your office for review. The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on October 6, 1997. The $450 review fee has been submitted by the applicant. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the July 13, 1998, public meeting. Please submit your report, by facsimile ff possible, no later than July 10, 1998. The purchase order wiH be sent to you under separate cover. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. ~/Rob~rt [G. Kassher Site Plan Reviewer PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 June 22, 1998 Terence G. Lewis, Sr. U.S Retirement Communities 101 Chesley Dr. Media, PA 19063-1761 Peconic Landing at Southold SCTM# 100-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lewis: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $450.00 from their environmental consultant for environmental planning services as per the enclosed letter fi-om Nelson, Pope & Voorhis. The above-mentioned sum must be paid in full before we can authorize our consultant to proceed with the review. The check should be made payable to the Town of Southold. When the consultants complete their review, the Planning Board will consider their findings in making a determination of whether the project will have a significant environmental impact. Sincerely, Chairman enc. NELEION, I::IOPE & VOORHIB~ LLC Bob Kassner Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box l 179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: June 16, 1998 JU q 17 1998 Southold Town Planning Board Life Care Community Pe¢oni¢ Landing at Southold SCTM Mo. 1000-35-1-25 Environmental Review Services N&P Job No. 97291 Dear Bob: As per your request, this letter provides you with a proposal for environmemal planning consulting services related to the above referenced project. The following services are proposed: Review project plan to determine if recommendations have been incorporated into proposed development. 2. Review Amended Part III Full EAF for coment and adequacy. Provide letter of recommendation regarding I and 2 above, which would support a determination of significance by the Town Planning Board. The above services can be completed for a lump sum fee of $450.00. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and please feel free to comact me should you have any questions. Very truly yours, Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP Tel~a (.~16) 727-2902 I¥.~.~b ($16) 727-014~ HOWA.qD W. YOU/40, Leml gmege~ 'lt/OIMg (L WOLP~T, P~f~a~e~l I:n#~m K[III, IETU E. RgRUZZO, Le~l gmeget JOitl.] ~(~UI, IURR, Leal gmega- HAND DELNERED ATTN: Mr. Bob Kassner Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 June 9, 1998 RE: Life Care Community PECONIC LANDING AT $OUTHOLD at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Kassner: Enclosed are five (5) copies of the Long Environmental Assessment Form - Part 3 Narrative Response to Comments dated June, 1998, for your use. This document includes the additional information requested by the Town Planning Board's environmental consultant by way of letter dated November 14,1997. We understand that submission of this additional information enables the Town to complete its review of the project under SEQRA and make a determination of significance. If you have any additional questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, TC _W~_ac? Encl. cc: Mr. Terry Lewis, USRC + Encl. Mr. John Dussling, USRC + Encl. Mr. John Capelli, ECCB + Encl. Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. + Encl. Mr. Jeffrey L. Seeman + Encl. Mr. Charles J. Voorhis + Encl. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. JUN ] 0 1998 Southold Town Planning Board Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Fester Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-18~2 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF $OUTHOLD May 29, 1998 Young & Young Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Peconic Landing SCTM #35-1-25 Dear Mr. Wolpert: The above referenced property was inspected by a member of this Board. The construction of a residential life care community complex, revised survey dated May 19, 1998, was found to be out of the Trustees Jurisdiction. This decision is not any type of approval from any other agency. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Albert J. Krupski, President, Board of Trustees AJK:jmd cc: Bldg. Dept. Planning Board MAY 9 1998 Southold Town Planning Board BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD -~-,.., Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 21, 1998 Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Rd. Melville, NY 11747 Re: Proposed site plan for Pecenic Landing SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Voorhis: Enclosed please find a copy of the latest revised site plan for the above mentioned proposal. Sincerely, Robert G. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer enc. Pl~nl~ I:n~oatmR & 400 O~ttandet Avonue RIv~d, ~1~ Ym.k 11901 (51G} 727-22( (516) 727-014 HOWARD W. YOUI~G, Le.d gu~eyw TUOXAg iL WOL~I~T, Pmfia~onel EnOw KEXXETU [. ABRUZZO, L*~I gme~- HAND DELIVERED ATTN: Mr. Bob Kassner Town of Southold Planning Board Office 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 May 20, 1998 RE: Life Care Community PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, ZNC, At Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Kassner: Enclosed are six (6) sets of the Site Plan, Sheets 1-7 last dated May 19, 1998 and Sheet 8 dated September 17, 1997, for your review. Please note that the Site Plan has been amended to reflect certain changes to the site layout, site grading and infrastructure based upon input from the Southold Planning Board, Southold Architectural Review Committee, Southold Board of Trustees, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Greenport Fire Department, and Suffolk County Water Authority. Please note further that a narrative report including additional maps and documentation that specifically address the comments contained in Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC letter dated November 14, 1997, will be hand delivered to your office on or about May 29, 1998. If you have any additional questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact us. TCW/sjt Encl. CC: Mr. Term,, Lewis, USRC Mr. 3ohn Dussling, USRC Mr. 3ohn Capelli, ECCB Mr. 3effrey L. Seeman Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. + I Set of Site Plan + 1 Set of Site Plan + I Set of Site Plan + 1 Set of Site Plan NAY 21 1998 Southold Town STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTNENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING ~50 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY hAUPPaUge, N.Y. li7B8-5518 CRAIG SIRACUSA, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR April 28, 1998 UOSEPH H. BOARDMAN COMMISSIONER Mr. Ronald Hill, P.E. Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, New York 11978 Your April 20. 1998 Letter Br t Route 25. Gr~epnort Our Case No. 89-229 Dear Mr. Hill: This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. In all furore correspondence, please refer to the subject case number. The plans must indicate the appropriate county tax map number. The subject material will be reviewed by Mr. Dan Herlihy of my staff. He can be contacted at (516) 952-6025 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By THOMAS F. OELERICH THOMAS F. OELERICH, P.E. Regional Traffic Engineer cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold.r...~, TFO:JH:JS APR g 9 1998 Southold Town Planning Board Dunn Engineering Associates Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N,Y, 11978 516-288-2480 516-288-2544 Fax April 20, 1998 Mr. Vito Lena Regional Permit Engineer New York State Dspatbnent of Transportation State Office Building Hauppauge, NY 11788 Re: Your Case No. 89-229 Breakers-At-Lands End Route 25, Greenport Dear Mr. Lena: On January 13, 1998 our office submitted a revised set of roadway improvements for the above noted project in response to Mr. Oelefich's November 10, 1997 letter. As over three months has passed since our submittal we would appreciate a response to our submission. You may recall that in Mr. Oelerich's letter of April 8, 1997 that the plans for the improvement of Route 25 in the vicinity of the site driveway and the driveways themselves were approved. The focus of the comments in the letters of April 8, 1997 and November 10, 1997 were on additional improvements that the State desired be made at the intersection of Route 25 with C.R. 48. You may further recall that the initial traffic study, which included commercial development, as well as, the condominium units, recommended that the intersection flasher be converted to a full traffic signal. The applicant agreed to this improvement despite the fact that the commercial part of the project has been abandoned. In April your office requested that additional pedestrian features bo added to the signal because of the proximity of the proposed development to the Village of Greenport, about one mile. The applicant agreed and supplied pedestrian features in our May 16, 1997 response. After a five month review period your office further requested that the geometfics of the intersection be changed including provision of a raised island for pedestrians and shoulder widening for bicyclists despite the fact that this intersection is over a half a mile fi:om the site and it is questionable as to whether these improvements should be the applicant's responsibility. The applicant has agreed to the improvements requested to date, but would appreciate a more timely review so that tiffs process may be concluded expeditiously. Mr. Vito Lena April 20, 1998 Page 2 If you have any questions or require any additional information, please call me. Sincerely, RONALD HILL, P.E. Principal L980337 cc: Mr. Richard Lark, Esq. Ewing Cole Cherry Brott March 3, 1998 Architects Engmeers Interior Designers Planners / Independence Mall West 100 North 6th Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 1590 215.923.2020 Fax 215.574.9163 Mr. Robert Kassner Landmark Preservation Commission Town of Southold 145 Teepee Trail Southold, NY 11971 Dear Bob: Re: Peconie Landing Project No. 97012 Over the course of the past year, you have been extremely helpful in assisting Mr. Robert McConnell of ECCB and Mr. Terry Lewis ofU. S. Retirement Communities as well as representatives of Young and Young in the review and approval of our project. As we have been developing the project, we have been confirming in greater detail the cost of construction, as Well as collecting comments from the prospective buyers in order to "fine tune" the design. A recommendation drawn from this process has indicated that it would be more beneficial from the buyers perspective as well as the economic constraints to alter the size and configuration of the apartment building. This concept was broached by Mr. Lewis just recently and we have now had the opportunity to complete some preliminary drawings which we would like to review with you and Ms. Valerie Scopaz. The basis of these changes will have a beneficial contribution to the project and to the overall site as well. They are as follows: · Reduction in overall impervious site coverage and building footprint. · Reduce walking distances for the elderly population that will live here. By relocating the apartments over the community center to the apartment building, we no longer have a mixed use occupancy which would require a 3-hour fire separation. We have thereby kept all senior housing residents within a senior housing building which will simply the construction and thereby reduce the overall cost of the construction. Ewing Cole Cherry Brott Mr. Robert Kassner Re: Peconic Landing March 3, 1998 Page 2 The buyer focus groups have expressed a strong interest to have views of the Long Island Sound from their apartment, thereby placing those units in the third floor of the apartment building will elevate those units and offer the residents a better view of the site and the Long Island Sound. This increase in marketability makes the project more attractive and thereby increases its likelihood of success. To do this, we took into consideration the zoning ordinance of the Town of Southold and have prepared calculations which indicate the allowable area that could be constructed within the zoning ordinance. As indicated in the attached diagram, we have calculated the allowable area and distributed this area at the northern end of the building, which is responsive to the views as well as the location of the community center. This is also a more economical way to construct the apartment building not only from a cost but from a structural perspective. Area by Code Permitted Storey Actual Area Permitted by Code Percemage by Code Notes First Floor 88,700 Second Floor 88,700 Third Floor 44,350 50% Total Area 221,750 Actual Area Proposed Storey Actual Area All calculations include Balconies & exclude garage Actual Area Actual Percentage Notes First Floor 88,700 Second Floor 88,700 Third Floor 36,194 41% Total Area 213,594 All calculations include Balconies & exclude garage Ewing Cole Cherry Brott Mr. Robert Kassner Re: Peeonic Landing March 3, 1998 Page 3 By so doing, we have maintained the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance while being sensitive to the views, character and ambiance of the site as well as the economic constraints. It is for this reason that we are proposing these changes and have explained to you the logic behind these changes in the hope that the Town of Southold will look upon them favorably. We look forward to reviewing this in greater detail with you. Regards, EWING COLE CHERRY BROTT John L. Capelli, AIA Direct Dial 215.625.4626 JLC:ams Enclosure: Height Diagram and Marketing Plan cc(w/encl): Mr. Terence Lewis - U. S. Retirement Communities - NY, LLC Mr. Valerie Scopaz - Southold Town Planner Mr. Thomas Wolpert - Young and Young Ewing Cole C~rry Brott March 3, 1998 Architects Engineers Interior Designers Planners Federal Reserve Bank Building independence Mall West 100 North 6th Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106-1590 Fax 215.574.9163 Mr. Robert Kassner Landmark Preservation Commission Town of Southold 145 Teepee Trail Southold, NY 11971 Dear Bob: Re: Peconic Landing Project No. 97012 Southold Town Planning Board Over the course of the past year, you have been extremely helpful in assisting Mr. Robert McCormell of ECCB and Mr. Terry Lewis ofU. S. Retirement Communities as well as representatives of Young and Young in the review and approval of our project. As we have been developing the project, we have been confirming in greater detail the cost of construction, as well as collecting comments from the prospective buyers in order to "fine tune" the design. A recommendation drawn from this process has indicated that it would be more beneficial from the buyers perspective as well as the economic constraints to alter the size and configuration of the apartment building. This concept was broached by Mr. Lewis just recently and we have now had the opportunity to complete some preliminary drawings which we would like to review with you and Ms. Valerie Scopaz. The basis of these changes will have a beneficial contribution to the project and to the overall site as well. They are as follows: · Reduction in overall impervious site coverage and building footprint. · Reduce walking distances for the elderly population that will live here. By relocating the apartments over the community center to the apartment building, we no longer have a mixed use occupancy which would require a 3-hour fire separation. We have thereby kept all senior housing residents within a senior housing building which will simply the construction and thereby reduce the overall cost of the construction. I'hiladelphi, t, PA W)shington, D( Hadd.nfield, N/ Ewing Cole Cherry Brott Mr. Robert Kassner Re: Peconic Landing March 3, 1998 Page 2 The buyer focus groups have expressed a strong interest to have views of the Long Island Sound from their apartment, thereby placing those units in the third floor of the apartment building will elevate those units and offer the residents a better view of the site and the Long Island Sound. This increase in marketability makes the project more attractive and thereby increases its likelihood of success. To do this, we took into consideration the zoning ordinance of the Town of Southold and have prepared calculations which indicate the allowable area that could be constructed within the zoning ordinance. As indicated in the attached diagram, we have calculated the allowable area and distributed this area at the northern end of the building, which is responsive to the views as well as the location of the community center. This is also a more economical way to construct the apartment building not only from a cost but from a structural perspective. Area by Code Permitted Storey Actual Area Permitted by Code Percentage by Code Notes First Floor 88,700 Second Floor 88,700 Third Floor 44,350 50% Total Area 221,750 All calculations include Balconies & exclude garage Actual Area Proposed Storey Actual Area Actual Area Actual Percentage Notes First Floor 88,700 Second Floor 88,700 Third Floor 36,194 41% Total Area 213,594 All calculations include Balconies & exclude garage Ewing Cole Ch~erry Brott Mr. Robert Kassner Re: Peeonic Landing March 3, 1998 Page 3 By so doing, we have maintained the spirit and intent oft_he zoning ordinance while being sensitive to the views, character and ambiance of the site as well as the economic constraints. It is for this reason that we are proposing these changes and have explained to you the logic behind these changes in the hope that the Town of Southold will look upon them favorably. We look forward to reviewing this in greater detail with you. Regards, EWING COLE CHER~Y BROTT John L. Capelli, Direct Dial 215.625.4626 JLC:ams Enclosure: Height Diagram and Marketing Plan cc(w/end): Mr. Terence Lewis - U. S. Retirement Communities - NY, LLC Mr. Valerie Scopaz - Southold Town Planner Mr. Thomas Wolpert - Young and Young STATE OF N~3N YORK DEPARTHENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEHORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 CRAIG SIRACUSA, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR January 23, 1998 Mr. Patrick Lenihan, Senior Engineer Durra Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, New York 11978 Dear Mr. Lenihan: Yollr Jamlory 13. 1998 Resubmission Bre0kers at Lands End Greenport Our Case No. 89-229 This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. The subject material will be reviewed by Mr. D. Herlihy of my staff. He can be contacted at (516) 952-6025 if you have any questions. In all future correspondence, kindly refer to the subject case number. The plans must indicate the appropriate county tax map number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, THOMAS F. OELERICH, P.E. Regional Traffic Engineer cc: Ms. Valerie Scope, To~ of Sou~ol~ Dunn Engineering As~Iciates Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 516-288-2480 516-288-2544 Fax January 13,1998 Mr. Vito Lena Regional Permit Engineer New York State Department of Transportation State Office Building 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Re: Roadway Improvement Plans Breakers at Lands End Route 25, Greenport Your Case No. 89-229 Dear Mr. Lena: We are in receipt of your November 10, 1997 comments concerning the roadway improvement plans submitted for the above referenced project. We have addressed these comments and made the necessary modifications to the roadway improvement plans. Your previous letter of April 8, 1997 indicated that the roadwork portion of the plans were acceptable as submitted. However, due to the additional roadwork required as a result of these comments, the entire plan set is included in this package. With this letter we transmit four sets of these revised plans for your review and approval. The following is a list of your comments followed by our response as reflected in the revised plans. Comment 1: Install a raised island for the pedestrian facilities on the southeast side. Response 1: The amended plan set includes the design of a raised island where the painted channelizing island exists, This island contains a pedestrian push button and signal assembly for pedestrians wishing to cross Route 25. Comment 2: Install pedestrian indications in the island. Mr. Vito Lena January 9, 1998 Page 2 Response 2: See response 1. Comment 3: Install handicapped ramps in the proposed island. Response 3: The proposed design includes two handicapped ramps in the proposed island. Comment 4: Reduce width of travel lane from 15 feet to 12 feet and install an asphalt shoulder in order to provide for a bicycle path. This shoulder should continue west through the intersection and taper to meet existing conditions at the point where County Road 48 begins. Response 4: The new plans include a reduction in width of the westbound thru lane as well as widening of the asphalt shoulder to provide a 6 feet wide shoulder on the North side from Sound Road to the pedestrian push button and a 5 foot wide shoulder on the north side west of the push button to CR48 Comment 5: Install pavement as necessary to accommodate pedestrians using the pedestrian push button on the north side of Route 25. Response 5: An 8 foot wide asphalt area has been provided form the edge of the shoulder on the north side back to the pedestrian push button. Comment 6: Install a W5-2D Pedestrian Warning Sign on the east side of Route 25 for northbound motorists. Response 6: The modified.design includes this Pedestrian Warning Sign. In addition to these comments, you noted that we did not respond to your provious letter dated June 27, 1997. This was due to the onging discussion concerning the accommodation of pedestrians with the DOT. The following are your comments from that letter followed by our responses. Comment 1: Your Traffic Signal Plan (Drawing TS-l) proposes to use the existing signal poles on new foundations. The existing signal installation must be removed before the new signal can be installed due to the rouse of the signal poles. Kindly show how traffic will be controlled at this intersection during the transition from the old to the new signal equipment. Mr. Vito Lena January 9, 1998 Page 3 Response 1: The intersection is currently controlled by a flashing signal stopping the northbound approach. However, there does exist a stop sign on the northbound approach. Therefore, the presence of this stop sign and the work zone warning signs will adequately control vehicles at the intersection during the short duration change over that the signal will not be operational. Comment 2: The uncontrolled northbound to eastbound movement at this intersection presents a potential pedestrian conflict when a pedestrian uses the pedestrian button believing they have the right- of-way. The described right turn movement must be controlled when the pedestrian crossing button is activated. Pedestrian indications should be installed in addition to the proposed pedestrian buttons. Response 2: We believe that this comment is superceded by the latest letter. Comment 3: Show a spacing diagram and clearance table on the traffic signal plan. Response 3: This information has been included on the revised signal plan. Comment 4: The height of the signal support poles must be incorporated into the notes. Response 4: This information has been included in the notes. Comment 5: Refer to the attached marked plan sheet. The pedestrian crosswalk should be shown through the channelizing island. The sequence table must be revised and some item numbers corrected. Response 5: These comments have been addressed in the revised plan minus those that are superceded by the later letter. We trust that these responses and modifications to the roadway improvement plans adequately address your concerns. The construction inspection agreement and inspection payment agreement forms shall arrive under separate cover. Mr. Vito Lena January 9, 1998 Page 4 If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sir)c~rely, PATRICK LENIHAN Senior Engineer PL:ks L980023 Enclosure New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 ~ SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Telephone (516) ~.~..0365 Facsimile (516) 44~.-0360 John P. Cahill Commi~ioner SEQR COORDINATION RESPONSE December 15, 1997 Planning Board office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Re:Peeonic Landing at Southold Inc. NYSDEC Facility # 1-4738 SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Orlowski; An initial review indicates that the NYSDEC may be an involved agency as defined in SEQR (6 NYCRR Part 617) due to Article 24 Freshwater wetlands, and Article 25 Tidal wetlands jurisdiction. However, as of this writing, no application has been received by DEC for this development. A permit (copy enclosed) was issued for clearing and filling within 100' of the freshwater wetland, and this may need to be transferred and/or modified depending on the extent of changes to the project. Please be advised the DEC has no objection your agency or another agency assuming lead agency for this action as the anticipated impacts are primarily of local significance. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (516) 444-0403 for further information or discussion. cc:U.S. J. Retirement Commmunitieas Seeman, Sincerely; Environmental Analyst I Coastal Environmental Corporation New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Telephone {516) ~ 0365 Facsimile (516) 4~.4-0373 Michael D. Zageta Commissioner AMENDMENT TO PERMIT : ,- December 19, 1996 The Wolowitz Organization 100 Great Neck Road Great Neck, NY 11021 Attn: Thomas Filazzola Re: Permit No. & Location: 1-4738-00174/00001 The Breakers at Lands End Main Rd., Southold Dear Permittee: Your recent request to extend pursuant to 6NYCRR, Part 621. January 31, 2002. the above permit has been reviewed The expiration date is extended to This letter is an amendment to the original permit and, as such, shall be available at the job site whenever authorized work is in progress. All other terms and conditions remain as written in the original permit. Very truly yours, ~it~E~mn~ni str at or cc: S. Hyman, P.E. New' York State De'partme f Environmental Conservation Building 40--SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 (516) 751- t389 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner January 21, 1992 The Wolowitz Organization 100 Great Neck Rd Great Neck,NY 11021 1-4738-00174/00001-0 Dear Permittee: In conformance with the requirements of the State Uniform Procedures Act (Article 70,ECL) and its implementing regulations (6NYCRR, Part 621) we are enclosing your permit. Please read alt conditions carefully. If you are unable to comply with any conditions, please contact us at the above address. Also enclosed is a permit sign which is to be conspicuously posted at the project site and protected from the weather. Very truly yours Robert N. Thurber Sr. Environmental Analyst RNT/nw enclosure 1-4738-00174/00001-0 PERMIT Under the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) January 21, 1992 January 31, 1997 -- Article 15, Title 5: Protection of Water -- Article 15, Title 15: __ Water Supply Article 15, Titte 15: Water Transport Article 15, Title 15: Long island Wells -- Adicle 15, Title 27: Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers 6NYCRR 608: __ Water Quality Certification -- Article 17, Titles 7, 8: __ SPDES [---~ Article 19: Air Pollutiun Control ~1 Article 23, Title 27: Mined Land Reclamation FT-1 Article 24: Freshwater Wetlands ~ Article 25: Tidal Wetlands [---'~ Article 27, Title 7; 6NYCRR 360: Solid Waste Management -- Adicle 27, Title 9; 6NYCRR 373: __ Hazardous Waste Management ] Article 34: __ Coastal Erosion Management J~"-j Article 36: Floodplain Management [--] Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 27, 37; ' J, 6NYCRR 380: Radiation Control ~--~ Other: The. Wolowitz Organization ( ~ ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE 100 Great Neck Rd., Great Neck, NY 11021 Thomas Filazzola I (516)593-8160 LOCATION OF PROJECT, FACILITY West of Island End Golf & Country Club, north of State Rte 25 COUNTY TOWN,~J~(')~/~( WATERCOURSE/WETLAND NO. NYTt~ COORDINATES Su ffol k Sout hold E:_ Clearing and fillin9 within 100' of the Freshwater Wetlands to be no closer than 50' from the wetlands edge, except at a 20' wide section where excavation and installation of an overflow discharge pipe will be made to the wetlands edge. All work to be in accordance with attached plans stamped approved by N¥SDEC (pp. 2 and 3 of 25). NOTE:The above approved work is associated with of. her activities (road and building construction) which do not need a permit since these activities are located greater t~han 100 feet frc~ the wetlands. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the ECL, all applicable regulations, the General Conditions specified (See Reverse Side) and any Special ConditiQns incluCed as part of this permit, n~..~--.'* .... ...... . ,t~-~.,-~-"'' ' Oeouty R~glona/ m,~.-.,~ ~ .r..~:. ,"n David DeRidder ,/,~/~"~"'~-'~~ January 21, 1992J Pa§e 1 of 5 ADDITIONAL GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ARTICLES 15 ~Title S), 24, 25, 34, 36 and 6 NYCRR Part 608 [ waters or flood IIows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of modification o( Ihtr watercourse hereby authorized shaJJ not be com- ) other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the proiect. Any materla[ dredged in the prosecution of the wock herein permitted shall be removed evenly, without leaving large refuse piles, ridge5 across the bed of a waterway or floodplain o~ deep holes that may have a tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of a waterway There shall be no unreasonable interference w~th navigation by the work herein authorized. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the project hereby authorized has not been completed, the applicant shal~, without expense to the State. and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or an,/ portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration, If granted under Article 36, this permit does not signify in any way that the project will be free from flooding, If granted under 6 NYCRR Part 608, the NYS Department of Environ- mental Conservation hereby certifies that the subject profect wiU not contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards under Sections 30~, 302, 303. 306 and 307 of the (:lean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217) provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met. All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as part of the permit application. Such approved plans were prepared ~y S _,]_ ~ymFirl ~ 1[_./~ last revised o, 8/14/91 SPECIAL CONDITIONS The permittee shall require that any contractor, project engineer, or other person responsible for the overall supervision of this project reads, understands, and complies with this permit and all its general, special, and supplementary special conditions. The permittee, or authorized representative, shall complete and return the top portion of the enclosed form notifying the Bureau of Environmental Protection of project commencement. Upon completion of the permt~te~ project, complete and re- turn the bottom portion of the form, along with photos, notifyin§ the Bureau of Environmental Protection of project completion. Markers used by this Department to delineate/define the boundary of the wetland or the extent of the permitted structures shall be left in place and shall remain un- disturbed for I year following completion of the permitted project. o Any work, disturbance, and/or storage of construction equipment and materials s~all be confined to within the "ltmit of clearing and disturbance" s~Qwn o~ the approved plan and/or to upland(non-wetland) ~reas more than 100 feet landward of the wetland boundary. A snow fence or o~her temporary, p~6~ect-limiting fence shq!l be erected prior to the commencement of any construction activities along the "limit of Clearing and Disturbance" in order to prevent the inadvertent intrusion of equipment into the protected area. The fence shall be maintained until project completion. il-4738-00174/00001-0 Page 3 of 5 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAl. CONSERVATION SPECIAL CONDITIONS For Article 24 ( Freshwater Wetlands t 10. 11. Prior to commencement of any construction activities, a continuous row of straw bales shall be staked end to end along the base of the snow fence (or other temp- orary, project-limiting fence) on the upslope or project side of the fence; The bales shall be maintained in place until all disturbed areas are permanently vegetated. Trapped sediments shall be removed to an approved upland site before the bales themselves are removed. Any debris, excess construction materials, or excess excavated materials shall be immediately and completely disposed of on an approved upland site more than 100 fee landward of any regulated wetland or waterbody. The materials in question shall be suitably stabilized so that they cannot re-enter any regulated water body, wetland or wetland adjacent area. All fill shall consist of soil, sand and/or gravel that is free of the following substances: ashphalt, slag, flyash, broken concrete, demolition debris, garbage, household refuse, tires, woody materials including tree debris, metal objects. Introduction of materials toxic to aquatic life is expressly prohibited. During the bank sloping operation soil shall not be placed in, graded toward, or allowed to enter the wetland or the area on the wetland side of the "Limit of Clearing and disturbance." All areas of soil disturbance resulting from this project shall be seeded with an appropriate perennial grass and mulched with straw immediately upon completion of the project, within two days of final grading, or by the expiration of the permit, whichever is first. -Mulch shall be maintained until a suitable vegetative cover is established. If seeding is impracticable due to the time of year, a temporary mulch shall be applied and final seeding shall be performed as soon as weather con- ditions favor germination and growth. Sod is also acceptable. The permittee shall incorporate the following language as a notice covenant to the deed: "Regulated freshwater wetlands are located in the north central portion of the condc minium complex known as "Breakers at Lands End" on the properties of the Wolowitz Organization and their heirs, asstngs or successors. This property is subject to the provisions of ECL Article 24, and the conduct of regulated activities may occur only pursuant to ECL article 24 if prior approval is given by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). Regulated activities include, but are not limited to, ~learing of vegetation; application of chemicals; excavation grading and filling; and erection of any structure(s)." This deed covenant shall be recorded within gO days of the issuance of this permit with the Clerk of S~ffolk County. A.~opy of the covenanted deed or other acceptable proof of record, along with the number'assigned to this permit, Sha~l be sent within one calendar year of the issuance of this permit to: NYSDEC, Regional Manager BEP, SUNY Bldg 40, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356. 1-4738-00174/00001-0 Page of 5 95-19-5 (10/g4)--10c NEW Y~K STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL coNSerVATION APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TRANSFER (In Accordance with Uniform Procedures, Part 621.13) Please read ALL instructions on back before completing this application. Please TYPE or PRINT clearly in ink. PART 1--TRANSFEREE (NEW OWNEPJOPERATORILESSEE) COMPLETES: 1. LIST PERMIT NUMBER(S) AND THEIR EFFECTIVE AND EXPIRATION DATES. 2. NAME OF TRANSFEREE If other than an individual, provide Taxpayer ID ) CITY STATE ZIP CODE 3. TRANSFEREE IS A/AN: [] Owner [] Operator [] Lessee 4. NAME OF FACILITY/PROJECT STREET CITY STATE ZiP CODE COUNTY TOWN 5. HAS WORK BEGUN ON THE PROJECT? [] Yes [] No If no, proposed starting date: Approximate completion date; If there will be any modifications to the current operation, the transferee must attach a statement specifying the details. CERTIFICATION: This certifies that the transferee is the current owner/operator/lessee of the named facility, has a copy of the permit, understands and will comply with all conditions in the referenced permit. Facility operations/project scope/discharges/emissions will remain the same. Further, I hereby affirm that under penalty of perjury that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted herewith is true to the best of my knowledge and belief: False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. Signature and Title Date FART 2--TRANSFEROR (FORMER OWNER/OPERATOR/LESSEE) COMPLETES: 1. NAME OF TRANSFEROR If other than an individual, provide Taxpayer ID Number STREET TELEPHONE NUMBER CITY STATE ZIP CODE 2. NAME OF FACILITY/PROJECT, iF DIFFERENT FROM NAME IN PART 1: 3. CERTIFICATION; This certifies that the facility referenced in Part 1 of this form will be/was transferred to the party identified as the new transferee (owner~cperat orllessee) on (date). Signature and Title Date PART 3--PERMIT TRANSFER VALIDATION SECTION--DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION COMPLETES: [] Transfer of permit approved. Transferee subject to conditions of permit, without exception. [] Transfer of permit approved, with the following modifications: [] See attached revised permit page(s) __ [~New application required. Please complete the enclosed permit application and return it to the undersigned Regional Permit Administrator, Division of Regulatory Affairs, at the appropriate office of the Department (see map on reverse). Signature Date Regional Permit Administrator- 'PLICATION FOR PERMIT TRANSFI~I General Instructions Transferee (new owner/operator/lessee) must: 1. Complete Part 1 of this form. 2. Have Part 2 of this form ~ompleted by former owner/operator/lessee (Transferor). If the information requested in Part 2 cannot be obtained, the transferee must attach a statement giving the reason(s). 3. Submit completed form (Parts 1 and 2) to the Regional Permit Administrator, Division of Regulatory Affairs, at the appropriate office of the department (see map below). Transferee may keep the last copy of this application. Other Instructions 4. Applications by a Corporation shall be signed by the principal executive officer; a Partnership by a general partner; a Sole Proprietorship by the proprietor; a Municipality or Public Corporation by the duly authorized principal executive officer; and a State agency by a person duly designated by the commissioner or other agency head. 5. If other than the owner makes application, written consent of the owner to use the property/facility must accompany the application. 6. The transferee is responsible for obtaining any other required federal, state or local permits. Contact the Regional Permit Administrator, Division of Regulatory Affairs, at the appropriate office of the department, as given below, for assistance regarding any of the above requirements. Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Offices Division of Regulatory Affairs REGION 6--DRA State Office Building 317 Washington Watertown, NY 13601-3787 (315) 785-2245 SUB-OFFICE--DRA State Office Building 207 Genesee St. Utica, NY 13501-2885 (315) 793-2555 REGION 9--DRA '~ REGION 8~DRA 270 Michigan Ave. [ 6274 E. Avon-Lima Rd. Buffalo, NY 14203-2999[, Avon, NY 14414-9519 128 South St. Olean, NY 14760-3632 {716) 372-0645 Regional Headquarters Regional Sub-Office Served by Sub-office. REGION $--DRA Route 86, PO Box 296 Ray Brook, NY 12977-0296 (518) 897-1234 SUB-OFFICE-- DRA County Route 40 P.O. Box 220 Warrensburg, NY- 12885-0220 (.518) 623-3671 REGION 4--DRA 1150 North Wescott Road. .~'~T~o.~.,3~..~ ~ Schenectady, NY 12306-2014 ~~.~ (518)357-2069 ~ ~ '~ SUB-OFFICE--DRA ~ ~ .e' ~' - Route 10, Jefferson Rd. I HCR#1, Box 3A ~ ~ ~ Stamford. NY 12167-9503 :lEGION 7--DRA ....... (607) 652-7364 615 Erie St. West Syracuse, NY 13204-2400 ~'~ ~-? ~,,=~t~ REGION 3--DRA (315) 426-7400 ~ ~-~ ~ I ~' I 21 South Putt Corners Rd. { '~'~ .,~"~'~ ~ New paltz, NY 12561-1696 SUB-OFFICE--DRA ~-J~..~ ~.~.~ (914) 256-3059 1285 Fisher Ave. '~ Cortland, NY 13045-1090 REGION 2--DRA (New York City) I Hunters Point Plaza 47-40 21st St. Long Island City, NY 11101-5407 (718) 482-4997 SUNY Campus Loop Rd., Building 40 Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 (516) 444-0360 PERMIT TRANSFER Submission Without a Cot, er Letter Sender: Subject: SCTM#: 1000. Date: I)_ Comments: PJshnln~ I:n~n~i'in~ & Lshd ~ul. vegln~ 400 O~nde RIv~h~d, X~ Yo~k 11901 T~ph~ (~,16) 727-2~0~ I:.~tmll. (~16) 727-01z~1- UOWA.~D W. YOUXO~ Lend gm'~egm. THO~.~ e. WOLI~I~T, Pmr~mlonal En~me~ K~IaNLTH I:. AgRUZZO, La~I gurvegor JOHJJ geuxuRR, Le~ gur~egm~ Al-tN: Mr. Robert G, Kasner, Planner Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O, Box 1179 Soufhold, New York 11971 December 2, 1997 RE: PECONiC LANDING AT $OUTHOLD at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Kasner: Please be advised that we have reviewed the Greenport Fire Department letter dated October 31, 1997 (copy enclosed). We understand that a meeting with the Planning Board and representatives from the Greenport Fire Department has been scheduled for 4:30 PM on Tuesday December 9, 1997 at Southold Town Hall. Representatives of U.S. Retirement Communities, Ewing Cole Architects, and Young & Young are planning to attend this meeting to discuss the issues raised by the Fire Department. If there any changes to the date, time, or place for this meeting, please advise. Very truly yours, TCW/nac Encl. cc: Warren Jensen, Chief Greenport, F.D. John Capelli, ECCB Terry Lewis, USRC John Dussling, USRC Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. DEC FIOV ).3 'ST 14:L~5 T~ C~' SC~ITHOLD October.~3.1, 1997 Organized 1845 Chairman Benne{t Ortowski Southoid Town Planning Boe~l PO Box 1179 Southold, NY. 11971 Re: Peconic Landing Dear Chairman: The Board of Fire Wardens and Chiefs of the Gmenport Fire Department have reviewed the site pian for the above~lerl'doned I:xoperb/. It is the request of the Board that the width of ail one-diredien roads be changed to 17 feet. The Boa~d aiso requeststhet a fire lane beldcat~ as indicated in bdue on page I of 8 on the general layout. AdditJomdly hydrants, n0~ad in pink be added and hydrants, noted in orange be omilted. We addifion~y ask that all hydmnt~ confo~ to ISO standards am:l that the en~Tre complex conform tothe NFPA 1141 standard for fire protection. The Boa~ of Fire Wardens would also ask that the principals consider se{ting aside a 100' x 200' aree for a I:X3ssible fttt~m substation, which could contain 1 ambulanns and 1 pumper truck. If you have any questions, you may leave a message for me at 477-4012. Chief WJ:cc Phinnln~, [l:ngln~ing ~ ~nrt ~urve§ln~, 400 O~t~andw Av~u~ RIveh~d, tJ~ York 11901 T.~l, ho~ (.gl6) 727-~0~ I~..,~.~ (gl6) 7~7.01U,. t.IOWARP W. YOUNO, L.~I December 1, 1997 ATTN: Mr. Robert G. Kasner, Planner Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Kasner: Enclosed is a copy of NYSDEC correspondence dated November 26, 1997, for your records. TCW/dn Encl. cc: Southold Board of Trustees + Encl. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. /~£C 3 99; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Phone {516) 444-0365 Fax # (516) ~.~.~-0360 Jolm p. Cabi]l November 26, 1997 Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Application I.D. No. 1-4738-01805/00001 Peconic Landing at Southold Lifecare Community Dear Mr. Wolpert: The Department of Environmental Conservation has received your application for the proposed development and we have the following comments/concerns: The proposed plan does not indicate who delineated the wetland boundary and the date. Therefore, this Department will conduct a field inspection and subsequent to that inspection, you may be required to modify the plans showing the correct wetland delineation. Please complete the enclosed Structural Archaeological Assessment form and return it to me. o Are any irrigation wells proposed? shown on the plans and a supplement will be required. If so, this must be form for a well permit Upon completion of the field inspection, a planting plan will be required. Please do not prepare a planting plan at this time in the event other modifications are required. 5 o Can the Greenport Sewerage Treatment Plant accept the increase in influent? o It appears the proposed community is out of jurisdiction for Article 25. Please provide a survey which shows elevation contour lines at two foot intervals, completed by a licensed surveyor, and referenced to USGVD, USC&G or NGVD. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. November 26, 1997 If you have any questions regarding this application please feel free to call me at 444-0365. Upon receipt of the requested information, the permit process will continue. Very truly yours, Carol A. Farkas Environmental Analyst I CAF:cg enclosure cc: U.S. Retirement Communities November 17, 1997 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING ~'50 VETERANS I~EI'4ORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 1178B-5516 Mr. Robert Kassner Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Your Undated Submission Peconic Landing Our Case No. 97-263 Dear Mr. Kassner: This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. The subject material will be reviewed by Mr. D. Herlihy of my staff. He can be contacted at (516) 952-6025 if you have any questions. In all future correspondence, kindly refer to the subject case number. The plans must indicate the appropriate county tax map number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, THOMAS F. OELERICH, P.E. Regional Traffic Engineer TFO:JH:BT PLANNING BOARD M~EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSI~LI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM $. CREMER$ KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICIZ-~LRD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 November 25, 1997 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Terence G. Lewis, Sr. US Retirement Communities 101 Chesley Dr. Media, PA 19063-1761 Re: Proposed site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lewis: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 24, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept the report of it's environmental consultant, Chades Voorhis, dated November 14, 1997. The consultant's report is enclosed for your attention. The report itemizes the information which must be provided in the requested revised and expanded Long Environmental Assessment Form. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Chairman enc. cc: Charles Voorhis, Nelson, Pope and Voorhis Chades Cuddy, Esq. Jeffrey L. Seeman, Coastal Environmental Corp. Thomas C. Wolpert, Young & Young John Dussling, U.S Retirement NBL, BON~ I:=C]PE & VOORHIB~ LLC CHARLES J VOORHIS, OEP AICP · ARTHUR J. KOERBER, PE · VINCENT G DONNELLY, PE · V~CTOR SERT. RE · JOSEPH R EPIFANIA, RE' ROBERTG NELSON, JR, RE · CHRISTOPHER W ROB)NSON. BE. Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Review of Long EAF, Parts 1 and 3 Peconic Landing at Southold SCTM No. 1000-035-1-25 N&P No. 97291 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, we have completed a review of the Long EAF, Parts 1 and 3 for the above referenced project, which were submitted together. The parcel has been field inspected by NP&V, and the LEAF, Part 1 has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of the revised Part 1 and a Part II LEAF checklist prepared by our office are attached. A narrative report of our findings is presented below. The parcel has been inspected, and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The site consists of 144.77 acres of land in the hamlet of Greenport, in the Town of Southold. The proposed project, which is described as a residential lifecare community, would offer a variety of living options for senior citizens ranging from independent living to skilled nursing care. The site plan shows a total of 118 detached single family cottages, 132 attached apartments, 24 assisted living units and a 32 bed Skilled Care Center. A previous application for the project site involved a 350 unit condominium development known as the Breakers at Lands End, which is referenced for comparison throughout the Long EAF, Part 3. The Peconic Landing property is located to the east of the Village of Greenport, on the north side of New York State Route 25 (Main Road). The site is immediately west of the Islands End Golf Course, and extends from Route 25 to Long Island Sound. A swale runs through the center of the site from south to north, although the topography to the east and west of the swale is relatively flat. There are two groundwater fed kettle ponds within the swale, with associated wetland habitats. The northern wetland is located at a low point between the bluffs, just above the beach. The bluffs rise to a maximum height of fifty feet, with only a slight dune at the base of Page 1 872 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE, NY Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Long EAF, Part 3 Review the swale near the wetland. Most of the site is characterized by early successional spedes and was historically used for agricultural crops and pasturing of livestock. The northern pond and adjacent dune have been disturbed by human activity, and the wetland vegetation is dominated by the opportunistic common reed (Phragmites australis). The southern pond is relatively pristine, with a wide wooded buffer. Areas of woodland are also found along the eastern border of the site. There are several historic and recent buildings on the southern portion of the site, including Brecknock Hall, a large stone mansion built in the early 19th century by the Floyd family. In addition, the Village of Greenport maintains a water pump station in the central portion of the site, which will remain under the proposed plan. Sand mining has also occurred on the property, and there is a large exposed pit to the west of the pump station. Dirt trails and pathways are found throughout the parcel, and vehicle access to the beach is possible from a trail along the eastern bluff. A poured concrete foundation is present to the southeast of the northern wetland. This foundation appears to be fairly recent and was likely intended for a large home which was never completed. A large pile of excavated fill remains near the foundation. The project site contains a variety of important environmental resources, including unusual geologic features, surface water features, wetlands, a variety of ecological habitats, and historic resources. This review will discuss the proposed project and its potential impact on these resources. Geologic Resources The project site contains a variety of important local geologic features, including high bluffs along Long Island Sound and a swale with kettle ponds running through the center of the property. In addition, there are limited areas of steep slopes elsewhere on site, although the steepest slopes are associated with the wetland borders. The Long EAF Part 3 does not provide a slope analysis for the property, however it is clear that some construction in areas of steep slopes over 15 percent will occur. This construction will include excavation and expansion of both wetland areas, as well as construction of roads and buildings. There is a high potential for erosion impacts as a result of the proposed project, particularly near the southern, more pristine wetland. It should be possible to mitigate these potential geologic impacts of the project, however, appropriate documentation has not been provided. A slope analysis and erosion control plan should be provided by the applicant so that the impacts can be assessed. The site plan does include the proposed grading for the project, but erosion control measures are only discussed in brief within the Long EAF, Part 3. It appears as though slopes as great as 25 percent will be created adjacent to the newly restored wetland areas. A slope analysis would also be useful in determining if relocation of building or other site amenities might be useful in minimizing erosion impacts. For instance, the proposed community center and apartment building will Page 2 Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Long EAF, Part 3 Review be located in the swale between the two wetlands, which contains steep slopes as well as slight depressions. Location of these buildings as proposed may result in erosion and significant changes to the drainage patterns within the swale, and alternative locations and/or mitigation might be considered which minimizes disturbance between the wetlands. One of the benefits of the proposed project is that the existing sand mine on site will be the location of a newly created stormwater wetland retention basin. This will minimize the need for off site disposal of sediments from the property, and is a creative use of the excavated pit. The proposed plan also provides adequate protection of the bluff to minimize erosion. A 100 foot setback would be maintained, with the exception of the proposed pedestrian footpath. The path follows the existing earth road where possible, and would require only minimal clearing of vegetation. In addition, the proposed gazebos will be located in areas which are already cleared, allowing residents to overlook the Sound, while minimizing disturbance to the bluff The proposed plan does not show a beach access point, although the proposed footpath descends to the dune on the north side of the northernmost pond. To the east, the footpath would follow the existing earth road, and would not require additional erosion control measures. The slope is relatively gentle in this area, and would allow handicapped accessibility. To the west, grading and erosion control for the proposed path would be necessary, and more detailed plans should be required as part of the ongoing review process to insure that erosion in this area is minimal. The dune at the base of the swale is currently unvegetated, and restoration of beach grass in this area and installation of a boardwalk would help limit future storm impacts. Water Resources The project site is located within Groundwater Zone IV, and there is an existing water supply pump station on site. Groundwater resources are only briefly discussed in the Part 3, Long EAF as impacts are expected to be minimal. The proposed retirement community will be served by the both the local water authority and by the Greenport sewer district, and thus sanitary flow from the site will not impact local groundwater quality. The permanent utility easement shown on the boundary survey should be shown on the site plan to ensure this easement is maintained. The Town may wish to consider asking the applicant to develop best management strategies for limiting use of fertilizer and pesticides on site, which would further reduce the groundwater impacts of the proposed project. Of greater concern are the pote~tial impacts to surface water resources on site, which include two freshwater POnds within the swale which drains towards Long Island Sound. The proposed project will involve extensive engineering~ of a positive overflow, stormwater detention'basin with a biofiltration system. The biofiltration system is intended to minimize the pollution load in both groundwater and surface water. Stormwater runoffwould be directed into a micropool to allow settling of sediments, and would then flow along a meandering channel vegetated with wetland species. The Page Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Long EAF, Part 3 Review vegetation is intended to slow the velocity of stormwater flow to filter sediments and reduce pollutant loads. Overflow from extreme storm events would be directed to the existing southern wetland. This wetland would be expanded to include a plunge pool at the stormwater outlet and a channel flowing into the existing pond. While this system appears to be well designed, the impacts on the relatively pristine existing wetland have not been analyzed. Drainage calculations were not included in information received by this office, so a determination of capacity can not be made. This information should be submitted to the Town Board for drainage review and would be useful in a revised Long EAF, Part 3. Additional information on the impact of the proposed project on this wetland is needed. An alternative might explore other options for the discharge of overflow stormwater. In addition, the hydrology of the existing wetlands, including an analysis of the contributing drainage should be included to ensure that neither wetland is adversely affected by the diversion of stormwater which would otherwise 'enter the existing basins. Ecological Resources The existing vegetation of the projec~ site is predominantly successional old field and successional shrubland. There are limited areas of oak-beech and early successional woodland, as well as wetland, beach, and maritime shrubland habitats. As currently proposed, the project would preserve almost all of the wetland and maritime shrubland vegetation, as well as portions of the existing woodlands. The applicant l~as not provided a habitat map within the Long EAF. It is recommended that the'applicant provide such a map in a revised Long EAF. This would help with the identification of areas of woodland on site which might be preserved as clusters within the proposed landscaping areas. There is an extensive area of oak-beech woodland along the eastern border of the property, as well as buffers of woodland around the perimeter of the wetlands. Although this is not virgin forest, there are trees of significant size and a well established understory of mountain laurel. These areas should be retained where possible and incorporated into the landscaping design for the site. In general, the impacts to the vegetation along the top of the bluff and along the beach should be minimal under the proposed plan. The vegetation along the top of the bluffs has been described as maritime shrubland, and will be almost entirely protected within the proposed 100 foot setback from the bluff. This area would be maintained as natural vegetation, with the exception of a narrow pedestrian path for use by community residents. Three gazebos are proposed along the top of the bluffs, but would be located in areas which are already cleared. The dune to the north of the northern wetland is a partially cleared. The Town may wish to require revegetation of this area, which might also include a boardwalk or similar structure for beach access, as access is not provided under the current plan. Page 4 Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Long EAF, Part 3 Review The proposed plan would involve excavation to expand both of the existing wetlands. This expansion and the creation of the proposed stormwater wetland will substantially increase the area of wetlands on site, however, the applicant must ensure that impacts to the native wetland habitats are not significant. The northern existing wetland is already somewhat disturbed, and consists ora pond with a fringe of common reed to the north and a large area dominated by common reed to the south. Under the proposed plan, this southern area would be excavated to create a second pond, reducing the total area of common reed and creating an additional open water environment. The Long EAF, Part 3 does not discuss the applicants rationale for this proposal, and it would not be advisable if the area were not already disturbed. There is an opportunity to improve the ecological value of the wetland, and the Town may wish to require that the applicant consider removal of all of the common reed, with replanting to create a more diverse wetland. While it is not expected that the removal of the common reed and creation of a pond would have an adverse impact if'properly and carefully constructed, the benefits of such a pond creation could be expanded through the development of a better wetland restoration plan. The southern existing wetland is more pristine, and consists of a glacial kettle with red maple and understory shrubs growing out of a shallow pond. Under the proposed plan, the southern border of the wetland would be expanded for the creation of a plunge pool and channel, which would carry overflow from the newly created stormwater basin to the south to the existing pond. The border of the wetland is relatively abrupt due to the presence of steep slopes, and thus the proposed expansion would not require extensive removal of existing wetland species, however, the impact of the proposed plan on the existing wetland should be studied in greater detail, particularly in view of the proposed grading and slopes. The submitted Long EAF only briefly discusses the hydrology of the wetland and impact to wetland species. The Town may wish to ask the applicant to consider other options for the handling of stormwater overflow from the proposed detention basin. Although it is expected that the biofllter of the stormwater basin will reduce the level of pollutant in runoff, the changes in hydrology, grading, and removal of wetland species is expected to have a significant adverse impact on this wetland based on the information currently available. Most of the remainder of the site consists of early successional shrubland and old field habitats, which are unlikely to contain significant numbers of rare species. These habitats are common in the vicinity of the site, and thus the proposed development of the upland portion of the site is not expected to result in a significant impacts. In addition, the existing successional habitats and landscaping around Brecknock Hall would be retained and would continue to provide visual screening of the interior of the site. It is not known whether the site contains rare or endangered species. The applicant contacted the New York State Natural Heritage Program, but the sheet listing endangered species found in the vicinity is missing from the Appendix of the Long EAF. A single sentence referencing these species is also missing on page 18 of the text of the NII~ Page NELBON. POPE ~, VOORHIS, LLC Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Long EAF, Part 3 Review Long EAF. The Long EAF does state that Lamont (1997) did not find any of these species on site, but there is no reference for this citation. Given the high level of disturbance on site, it is unlikely that these species are present, however, the applicant should provide this information in a revised Long EAF. Traffic A separate review of the traffic sections of the Long EAF has been prepared by a traffic engineer at Nelson & Pope, LLP, and is attached. The traffic study should be revised in response to these comments. The most substantial comment is that the applicant's engineer did not project the future "No Build" conditions, which should be utilized as a baseline rather than existing conditions. Preliminary results do suggest that traffic impacts will be minimal, and that a signal would not be required; however, substantiation should be provided based on sound traffic engineering principles. Land Use and Zoning The project site is located to the east of Greenport Village along the New York State Route 25 corridor, which contains a mix of residential and retail uses. Immediately east of the site is the Islands End Golf Course, and residential properties are present to the west and along the southern border. The site is zoned for Hamlet Density residential development (HD) with a small area of Limited Business (LB) zoning along Route 25. The maximum development allowed on the HD portion of the site would be approximately 350 condominium units, and the proposed development is an allowed use within the zoning district. Brecknock Hall is located on the LB portion of the site, which could be developed with approximately 108,000 square feet of retail space. The Long EAF suggests that this area would not be developed, as there are tentative plans for use of Brecknock Hall as a performing arts center, stating that this would be a benefit of the proposed plan as compared with the Breakers proposal. While this would be desirable, there is no assurance under the proposed plan that this portion of the parcel would not be developed for business use in the future. As development rights would remain on the LB portion of the property, the Town may wish to explore placement of covenants on the property which would ensure the preservation of Brecknock Hall and minimize the potential for incongruent uses on the remaining LB portion of the site. The proposed retirement community will be in keeping with the development in the surrounding area and is a contemplated used within the zoning district. Thus, as long as development of the LB portion of the site is controlled, the land use impacts of the proposed project are expected to be minimal. 6 Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Long EAF, Part 3 Review Visual Resources The project site is most visible from NYS Route 25, although a limited number of viewers observe the site from the adjacent golf course and residences. The proposed site plan includes preservation of a wooded buffer along the eastern border of the site, as well as retention of the landscaped and overgrown areas along Route 25. This area includes several large trees and ornamental species surrounding Brecknock Hall. Shrubby vegetation could also be retained along the western border, and would eventually grow to screen use of the site. Thus, the visual impacts of the proposed project will be minimal and will not intrude into the rural character of the area. Screening vegetation may be necessary along the border of the residence to the east of Brecknock Hall and the caretaker cottage, which is not part of the project site. Although landscaping is not discussed in detail in the Long EAF Part 3, it would be expected that the proposed retirement community will be attractively designed with well developed landscaping. The Town may wish to require a landscaping plan at a later stage of the review process, and such a plan might include use of native species which would reduce the need for fertilization and use of pesticides on site. Native maritime species are readily available, and could easily be included in the landscaping design for the proposed retirement community. Cultural Resources The proposed project site includes a 19th Century mansion, as well as several out buildings, some of which may have historical significance. Brecknock Hall will be retained under the proposed project, but the other buildings would be removed. In addition, the presence of surface water on site suggests that the site could contain prehistoric artifacts in addition to these historic resources. The value of these resources should be investigated more fully. In addition, the site is in an area of general archaeological significance. The combination of these factors indicates that a Stage lA and lB archaeology survey would be appropriate as part of a revised Long EAF. Economics The proposed project should result in significant tax generation to local districts. There will be no school children generated as under the previous condominium proposal, and the community will have on site security and health services which should reduce the need for these services within the local community. The Long EAF suggests that up to 80% of residents may come from outside the local area, although the project will accommodate local residents. Thus, the proposed project is desirable, particularly if the environmental impacts of the proposed project can be substantially mitigated. I~ Page 7 NI~LSON, POISE ~ VOORHIS, LLC Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Long EAF, Part 3 Review In conclusion, the proposed Peconic Landing Retirement Community appears to be well designed, and includes substantial mitigation, particularly of surface water and groundwater impacts; however, there is a need for an additional environmental study of the site. In order to make an informed decision on the proposed plan, the Town may wish to ask for an expanded Long EAF which would include the following: A topographic survey with slope analysis, · A hydrological study of the rainage basins on site, with discussion of the potential impacts to the existing wetlands, · Further information on the planting design of the proposed stormwater detention basin, · Further discussion of mitigation of impacts to wetland vegetation, · Exploration of options for wetland restoration and design, · Exploration of alternative stormwater systems which would not involve extensive grading in and adjacent to and within the existing wetland, · Documentation from the Natural Heritage Program on ram species, · Further discussion of the archaeological and historic resources on site, · Delineation of water supply utility easement, and · Preparation ora vegetation/habitat map. A reference list of sources of environmental documentation should also be required, as none is provided in the submitted Long EAF. We believe that additional information in the form of a revised Part 3, Long EAF is necessary to demonstrate that a "hard look" has been taken with regard to the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. This information will be used as a basis for a determination of significance. If you have any questions or wish any fi~rther input with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to call. enc: Long EAF Parts I & II Very truly yours, llI~ Page 8 NELI~ON, pOPE & VOORHII~, LLC LEAF Pane 19 51, Peeomc Landing ~ $outhold Traffic Impact Analysis Review N&P #97291 November 17, 1997 prowde the comparison to thc counts ob~ned ~om the municipal agencies. Typically, traffic counts for use in a Traffic Impact Study are not performed on a Friday, as it is g~nerally not representative of an average or t)l>ical day. In this case however, the volumes collected appear reasonable. In addition. August volumes .typically represem the ~m ~ s~'~o ~ stated in the CSF report. LEAF Pa~e 20 · Thc traffic analysis should include a trip generation comparison to the prcv/ons study prepared for the Breakers application r.o substantiat.~ their claim. Ens/~ Engineering. PC, Aueust 12, 1997 letter * Page I R~fer to comment I. above. Based on page 1 of the LEAF, the proposed breakdown of thc project is to be as follows: Single Family Demcbed Residential Collage ! 18 Units Attached Aparmmnt Units 132 Umts 250 Units A~si~J~l Living C~ntcr Units Sldllcd Care 24 Units 32 Units 56 Units The report properly references the ITE Trip Generation Manual, but impropcrl:/uses the data presented therein. The report trip generaqon should he revised to reflect the following brmkdown: 250 umts 56 Units Retirement Communi~, Land Usc 250 Congregate Care Facility, Land Use 252 EnsiRn Enlmecnn~, PC, August 12. 1997 letter - Pa~c 2 The latest revision of the Highway Capacity. Softy, are should be utiti~c.d doting tl~ preparation of Tra,ffic Impact Analyses. A "No Build" traffic volume conditiou should be prepared using approve.:; growth rate factors and other planned projects This condition would address future t~;~fi~lc c~ndi/aons in rite vicini~' of the site without the proposal. Re: P¢conic Landing ~t Southold November 17, 1997 P~je 2 Thc *.raffle gencrated by the proposal should be superimposed onto the "No Build" condition and the analyses performed. In this maancr, traffic conditions in the f~tum, upon ~ occupancy of the proposal can be d~.'~crm~ned d. Level of S~rvic~ C is acceptable for !eft mm movements from the minor street approach of - aa umignalized intersection. Route 25 is under thcjuri~liction of thc NYSDOT. During their review of thc project, the NYSDOT will provide input. i:Ln729 l\¢mt~n,-w TOTAL NELSON, POPE & VOORttlS, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 ][:ax: (516) 42%5620 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: ~--~ ~ , Company: '""~-~ Phone: Fax: FROM: Date: No. of Pages (including cover): Comments: Fax Phone:. Pages (including cover page): :,,e: //}~1~ .. ; · Urgent [] For Review ~ Please Comment I~ Please Reply I'~ Please Recycle v / OU'T%INE FOR ARCHrT~.CTIJI~., R~¥1~W COlVIMI~E PR.~EI~%'A'rION Novernb~ I~, 1997 Mr. Terry Lcwi~ of USRC will introciucc Bob McConneJl and myself. U,'~C ma}' v~ant to give some comidetafio~ to having a local, such a~ gev, ny Abrua~o or Tom Wolpert handle the introductions in or&r to bring a local face to the project. Al~et reviewing the Southold cx~le and discussions with Kenny Abmzzo and Tom Woil~-'rt, we would recommend the followiz~g prc~sntation which would be givea by Bob: 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW Give a de:w~ption of the design goat~ and organizational concepts a~ x~ell as summarize the relationship of thc overall imagev/~ the local architecture an~ shingle s~lc a.w~itectute. We will use the pe~'l~ecfivc 2. SITE PLaN PRINCIPLES Ve~ broa~ly outJJtm the organization of the sit~ with its relationship to B~knock Hall. Adjacent property fe~ures such a~ thc golf course, the cottage ~l~.io-~hips to th~ bluff, site uaffi¢ ~d landscape ~oncelm. We will ~s~ ;h~ site pl~ dra~ for ~ pan of thc presentation. 3. BUILDING ELEVATIONS Using the community c~nter elevation drawing prepared for thc Bo~d prcmntation, review ~c d~si~n featurcs and elcm~nts of thc fac. adc which an: carried out in the proje~-t. 4. MATERIALS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS At thi,~ point, we would open up thc di~u~sion to questiot~ from the ~ommi~a~m. Peconic Landing - Planning Board Presentation Outline 3.-' ~ Introduction - Jim R. ictgCharles Cuddy History of the site Current approved development Amendment to the site plan Pr°Ject componems Commitment to project Description of the Proiect - Terry Lewis Deacribe a CCRC (Life Care Commun/ry) Health Center - ALU-SNF Commtmiry Center Apartments Cottag~ CO-OP forte of organization Peconic Landing Inc - 501(¢)(3) (non-protit corp) spot. or US Retirement Conu'nunities - Developer US P.¢tirement Commtmkies - Operator/©perations and Administration Im___~_~L- John Dussling Preservation of open space Local employment Volunteers Municipal Services Traffic Utilities ~ n^ Schools , E~emen~ Building COd~ comiderafion Bailing layout Building desi~ - Health ~enter Co~uni~ Center Home d~i~ - ap~enta and co~ages ~enities - ~ol. te~s. beach Lighting - exterior Bree~k HM1 - Mmre P~king Engineering - Young & Young Site deser/pdon Setbacks - bluffs, wetlands Grading Roads Drainage Storm sewer Ponds Water Sanitaw sewer L~ds¢~ping Environmental Assessment - Jeff' Seeman facsimile TRANSMITTAL Fax #: Re: /,- ?~/ ~o,,'/,' c Pages: (including COVer) oUthold Town Plallnlna 5~095 Mai~ Rd. P.O, Box 1179 $oU'Lhold, NY 11971 Phone: (5161 765-193~ Fax #: (516) 765-3136 November 5, 1997 STATE OF NEW~ YORK STATE OFFICE BUII..~ING ;~50 Vm.~m..RANS MENORIAL HIGI-fl~AY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 117E~E~-S511~ Mr. Robert G. Kasner Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Peconic Landing at Southold N/S Route 25 Greenport Dear Mr. Kasner: We have reviewed the Long Environmental Assessment Form Narrative for the referenced development. We agree that the Southold Planning Board should continue acting as the SEQR lead agency. The traffic statement refers to peak hour traffic volumes, but does not differentiate between peak highway traffic and peak hour site generated traffic. No hourly information is provided to compare each peak hour, which can lead to confusion. As an example, does the Congregate Care Center never have more than one vehicle arrival and departure an hour in the morning'? No provision is made for eastbound left turns into the site. No information is provided for the proposed use of the property zoned LB (Limited Business). No information is provided concerning the nearest signalized intersection to the west. A Traffic Impact Study is required. Please advise the applicant to contact Mr. Thomas Oelerich, Regional Traffic Engineer for Traffic Study requirements. For other questions, you may contact G. Beierling at 952-6128. Thank you for this opportunity to review, update and comment on this property development. Very truly yours, MICHAEL AZER Planning & Program Management 1s'r ASST. THOMAS R. WATKINS Sr. 2~0 ASST. WAYDE T, MANWARING TREAS. K. LANGONE SECRETARY C, CAPRISE CHAPLAIN C. KUMJIAN October 31, 1997 Organized 1845 E.Mail - greenport-fd Ojuno.con~ (516) 477-9801 - STATION 1 (516) 477-1943 ~ CHIEFS OFFICE (516) 477-4012 - FAXJMESS P.O. BOX 58 THIRD STREET GREENPORT, NY 11944 Chairman Bennett Odowski Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing Dear Chairman: The Board of Fire Wardens and Chiefs of the Greenport Fire Department have reviewed the site plan for the above-mentioned property. It is the request of the Board that the width of all one-direction roads be changed to 17 feet. The Board also requests that a fire lane be located as indicated in blue on page 1 of 8 on the general layout. Additionally hydrants, noted in pink be added and hydrants, noted in orange be omitted. We additionally ask that all hydrants conform to ISO standards and that the entire complex conform to the NFPA 1141 standard for fire protection. The Board of Fire Wardens would also ask that the principals consider setting aside a 100' x 200' area for a possible future substation, which could contain 1 ambulance and 1 pumper truck. If you have any questions, you may leave a message for me at 477-4012. Chief WJ:cc Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCTM#: 1000- 3~--/-~ Date: Comments: Southold Town Planning Board NELSON, POpI= & VOORHII=, LIc CHARLESJ. VOORHIS, CERAICP-ARTHURJ KOERBEB, RE · VINCENTG DONNELLY, PE · VICTOR BERT, I~E ~ JOSEPH R EPIFANIA, BE. ROBERT G NELSON, JR, RE · CHRISTOPHER W ROBINSON, PS ]Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Plann'mg Board Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: July 23, 1998 JUL g 4 1998 Southold Town Planning Board Review of Additional Materiais Pec0nic Landing at Southold SCTM No. 1000-035-1-25 N&P No. 97291 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As requested by the Town Planning Department, our office has reviewed the additionai materials submitted by the engineer for the above referenced project. These materiais were submitted to answer the concerns outlined in our review of the Response to Comments on the Long EAF, Part 3. In addition, a meeting was held on 7/19/98 between the engineer, Town Planning Staff and NP&V. Based on this discussion and the submitted information, we believe that the potentiai environmentai impacts of the proposed project can be substantiaily mitigated. Although some details remain to be resolved, further revision of the site plan is not expected to be necessary and preliminary approvai of the project appears reasonable. The following text outlines the remaining issues which should be considered. Slopes and Erosion Control The engineer has submitted both a discussion of the steep slopes on the property and generalized recommendations for erosion control. The report emphasizes that the slopes ~ character to the proposed plan, and that the proposed grading will not direct nm-off to the bluff. For the area near cottages 33 to 42, the engineer argues that the slope forms a terrace at the existing road, which will help minimize sedimentation of the wetlands. If grading of in this area is confined to the west of the road, impacts can be minimized with proper erosion control measures. In addition, it appears that erosion can be contained on the eastern side of the wetland at cottage 83, where the retaining wall is designed primarily for aesthetic value and to minimize erosion at the existing road. Thus, relocation of the proposed structures does not appear necessary. The erosion control plan is still very general, with the exeeption of the areas adjacent to the wetland, and details such as locations of sediment basins and diversion swales should be established in consultation with the Page I OPeconic Landing ~ Greenport Final Review Town Engineer. As was discussed in the earlier review letters, a boardwalk or similar structure should be considered to provide access a~ross the dune at the base of the swale. It is reco~mm~end___~ that a site specific er°si°n contr°!~ l~'~'ma~p'~!'ail'he~pmpa~l' ~~0 The engineer has supplied drainage calculations for road run-off, but the opacity of the detention basins is not presented. The design of this system should be reviewed by the Town Engineer. In addition, as was discussed in the earlier review, a planting plan should be developed for the stormwater basins. The use of the proposed biofiltration s~,stem is desirable, however, w%etland plantings may have a high failure rate if the system is not properly designed. Landscnoinn A general landscaping plan has been prepared which includes areas of wildflowers for slope stabilization and outlines existing woody areas to remain. The proposed natural areas should be clearly delineated in the field prior to construction to prevent inadvertent clearing. Details of the species to be utilized are given only for the cottage area, however, appropriate native and near- native species with wildlife benefit have been utilized. Similar species should be utilized elsewhere on site. Screening vegetation will remain along the borders of the site as recommended. Thc landscaping plan indicates that selective clearing of the marit'une shrub vegetation and pruning of existing trees will occur along the bluff to open views from the cottages. Pruning of the lower branches of trees along the bluff would be acceptable, however, clearing of the maritime shrub vegetation could result in significant erosion impacts. This vegetation represents a natural protective feature which would be regulated under the Town's Coastal Erosion HaTard Area ordinance. Where possible, shrub vegetation should be preserved within the 100 font buffer, given the constraints of grading. Limited clearing might be allowed in areas which slope away from the bluff, where erosion is a lesser cone, em Preservatipn ~?f_~h? ~existing maritime shrub habitat should be made a condition of final approval. Cultural Resources An archaeological report has been submitted to the NY State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation for review, and the approval of the project should be subject to any recommendations from the State. Preliminary review suggests that the property does have the potential for aboriginal occupation. The report does not discuss the existing structures on site, indicating that Brecknock Hall and the associated structures are on an "outparcel". These structures are located on the property, and the plan indicates removal of all structures with the exception of Brceknock Hall. The historic value of the frame structures should be determined, and a covenant should be utilized to insure that Breeknock Hall is preserved on site as currently pT~posed. ~ Page 2 Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Final Review In Summary, as long as these issues are addressed, it is not exPected that the proposed project will result in significant impacts to the environmental resources of the site. If you have any questions or wish any further input in regard to this matter, plea.se do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, NEL,.~9~E, ~ ~ ~rles J. V,~orhis, CEP, AICP Page 3 PLANNING BOARD MEMBE.~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICI{ARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 27, 1998 James Warren, Historic Preservation, Program Analyst NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Peebles Island ~ PO Box 189 Waterford, NY 12188-0189 RE: Review of Archaeological Evaluation for Peconic Landing at Southold Lffecare Community Main Road, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Warren, An archaeological evaluation was sent to you on July 21, 1998, for a project called Peconic Landing. In my letter I forgot to mention that the Planning Board is planning to issue a determination of significance under SEQRA at it's meeting on August 10, 1998. It would be greatly appreciated ff you could complete your review and get back to us no later than August 6, 1998. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me at this office. Site Plan Reviewer RAYMOND L. JACOBS SUPERINTENDENT $OUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Fax (516)- 765 ~ 1750 JAMES A. RICH/~, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(516)- 765- 3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Peconic Landing SCTM #: 1000 - 35 - 01 - 25 Dear Mr. Orlowski: July 23, 1998 JUL 2 3 1998 Southold Town Planning Board As per your request, I have reviewed the current plans and drainage calculations for the above referenced project and I offer the following comments: 1. Drainage Calculations & Design: The calculations that have been provided are incomplete. Data supplied for the sizing of drainage pipe is adequate, but additional information and modifications to the calculations are required to evaluate the overall system. What is the total volume of runoff generated during a six (6") inch rain within each system? It has also been noted that the run off coefficient used throughout the design is (0.25). This is acceptable for all lawns & general landscaping areas but all building foot prints and impervious pavement surfaces require a coefficient of (1.0). With the amount of construction proposed for this project, it would appear that additional volumes of run off would be generated if the road and roof surfaces were separated and calculated independently from the remaining acreage. 2. Recharge Basins - Pond Areas: As per the Town Code "Recharge basins and drainage areas are designed to return storm water to the existing aquifer." Section A108- 29.D. requires a test hole that indicates a minimum of five (5') feet of good leaching material at the bottom of the basin. The current design of the ponds require two (2") feet of compacted clay or other material to act as a liner for each pond. What design parameters have been established to allow for the pond to exist and still recharge water into the ground when the maximum design elevations of each pond have been reached. It would also be necessary to have the total capacity of the pond areas and an understanding of how they will function to fully evaluate the system. 3. Leaching System "A" & Leaching System "B": These items were not included in design calculations. Please include all design items including the size pipe that will be used to interconnect the leaching pools, Page 1of 2 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board July 21, 1998 Page 2of 2 4. Catch Basins: Section A 108-34. of the Town Code indicated a maximum distance of three hundred fifty (350') feet between CB's. This distance could be larger if a high point existed between each basin but it appears that several locations have not complied with this requirement. (One example would be between NCB 6.01 and NCB 7.01 [650'+/-]) 5. Drainage Piping Below Building Construction: On at least five separate occasions, 18" diameter HDPE drainage pipe has been indicated below building footprints. This is not considered acceptable practice to utilize and install HDPE drainage pipe below building footings. These areas should be upgraded to include cast iron pipe of adequate size or other such means to ensure the safety and integrity of proposed building construction. This drainage pipe should also run through foundation walls above the footings. 6. NCB 1.08.0: This catch basin has been established on a radius and has three 18" diameter pipes entering the box. One pipe enters the box at an extreme angle. It appears that the installation of another manhole might be necessary to maintain the structural integrity of this catch basin. 7. The following list of items includes locations where information has inadvertently been mislabelled or left off of the drawings. Please clarify the following: * It appears that Rock Headwall #2 is listed as Headwall #1 on drawing #2 of 8. * NCB 6.01.0 to Rock Headwall #3. What is the size and length of pipe? * NCB 2.15.1 to NMH 2.15.0. What is the size of the pipe? * NMH 2.15.0 to NCB 2.14.0. What is the size of the pipe? * NCB 2.06.0 has been drawn as a manhole not a catch basin. Should it be "NMH"? These items, while listed in my review, are considered minor coordination items to verify required construction items. This list was generated during my review of the overall system and is not intended to be a complete list. 8. Cut & Fill: It is my understanding that this project has been designed in such a manner that the Cut & Fill on this site has been equalized throughout the entire project. With the recent history of this site in mind, I would strongly recommend that at no time should Fill be allowed to leave the site for any reason without the direct written approval of the Town. All requests for the same should include soil properties, quantities and destination of material. CC: If you have any questions concerning this report, please ¢ Raymond L. Jacobs Superintendent of Highways New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (516) 444-0365 FAX: (516) 444-0360 John P. Cahill Commissioner July 20, 1998 Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Town Hall, Main Street Southold, NY 11971 RE: NYSDEC Permit #1-4738-01805/00001 Peconic Landing at Southold JUL 1998 Southold Town Planning Board Dear Mr. Kassner: As a follow-up to my letter dated July 6, 1998 regarding water supply and sanitary sewage for the above proposed development, have attached a copy of a letter from Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert of Young & Young, addressing the sanitary sewage concerns. I Please be advised, that this Department, specifically the Division of Water concurs with Mr. Wolpert, in that the Greenport Sewerage Treatment Plant will be able to handle the additional influent. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 444-0365. Sincerely, Carol A. Farkas Environmental Analyst I CAF:cg enclosure cc: T. Wolpert/enc. Tml4.~ (giG) 727.220~ I~.~ (.~16) 727-0144 UOWARD W. YOUNG, Lind .~w~i~m. TUOUA.~ (L WOLI~RT, P~l~mle~i KE#NETU I:. A~RUZZO, Lind JO~lg g(!I.INURR, LaM ATTN: Ms. Carol A. Farkas, Environmental Analyst I New Yark State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits Region 1 Headquarters SUNY Campus - Building 40 Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 RE: Life Care Community June 30,1998 PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) NYSDEC Appl. ID No.: 1-4738-01805-00001 Dear Ms, Farkas: Please be advised that we believe that the Greenpor~ Sewerage Treatment Plant has the capacity to accept the increase in influent as a result .of development of the subject property as proposed. This opinion is based on a review of documention in the form of a Water Supply and Sanitary Sewage Agreement signed on March 7, 1986 by the Village of Greenport and the Greenport Development Corp. and a 'will serve" letter to LBV Properties signed by Mayor William R. Peli Iii on December 17, 1992. These documents commit the Village to accept approx. 200,000 gallons per day of sanitary sewage from the site. Please note that the sanitary design flow for the Peconlc Landing Life Care Community project is only 60,000 gallons per day. One (1) copy of the Water Supply and Sanitary Sewage Agreement dated March 7, 1986 and one (1) copy of the Village of Greenport letter dated December 17, 1992 are enclosed, for reference. Page 2 June 30, 1998 if you have any additional questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. TCW/nac Encl. Mr. Terry Lewis, USRC Mr. John Dus$11ng, USRC Mr. John Capelli, ECCB Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert P.E. Pllinnln~ [n~,iheetln~. & Lilhd ~ul.~egln~, RIv h, d, 14ow York 11901 UOWARD W. YOWJO, Leal TUOUAg e. WOLPERT, Pmf~morml K[IJI~ETU [. ABRUZZO, Lml JOUX g(~tlldURR, Land gmege~ HAND DELIVERED ATTN: Mr. Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold - Planning Board Office 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 July 20, 1998 JUL tSouthotd ~'~ovvn Re: Continuing Care Retirement Community PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Kassner: We have completed our review of Nelson, Pope, & Voorhis, LLC letter dated July 13, 1998. This letter idemified certain issues that either remained outstanding or required clarification prior to approval of the final site plan. The following documents and comments are submitted in response to the eight (8) buffeted comments in the conclusions section of the Town's environmental review letter: We believe that the relocation of cottages 33-42 and 83 may not be necessary if we can mitigate the concerns relative to construction in areas with slopes greater than 15%. Refer to enclosed report entitled "Discussion on Slopes", dated July 20, 1998. 2. Refer to enclosed report entitled "Erosion Control Plan", dated July 20, 1998. 3. Refer to enclosed Drainage Calculations dated July 16, 1998. a. The NYSDEC has subsequemly acknowledged that the G-reenport Sewage Treatment Plant is able to accept the proposed increase in influent. b. No irrigation wells are proposed. Page 2 July 20, 1998 5. The applicant/developer understands that NYSDEC approval is required for any constmetion within 100 feet of the existing freshwater wetlands including restoration of the common reed portion of the northerly wetland. 6. A landscaping plan will be submitted on July 20, 1998 under separate cover letter. 7. Refer to enclosed Historical/Archaeological Sensitivity Evaluation dated July 1998, prepared by Greenhouse Consultants. 8. Mitigation measures to preserve visual resources will be included in the final landscaping plan. If you have any additional questions or comments concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact us. TCW/dn Enclosures Mr. Terry Lewis, USRC +End. Mr. John Dussling, USRC +End. Mr. John Capelli, ECCB +End. Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. +Encl. Mr. Jeffrey L. Seeman +End. Mr. Charles J. Voorhis +Encl. VeD' truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD AT GREENPORT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK DISCUSSION ON SLOPES YOUNG & YOUNG PLANNING, ENGINEERING, & LAND SURVEYING RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK JULY 20,1998 The Review suggests "If possible, the proposed site plan should be revised to limit the number of units which are placed in areas with slopes over 15%." A. 1. A 15% slope, for example, has a rise of 3 feet in 20 feet, or 1 foot in 6.667 feet. 2. A slope of 15% in the "Catskill Region" of New York would be considered "flat." 3. Road-side slopes of 1:3 (33.33%) are permitted by most local codes. 4. A slope of 1:4 (25%) is easily mowed, with no fear of overturning a riding mower. 5. A shopping cart will not roll (by itself) on an asphalt parking area until the slope exceeds 1:4 (25%). 6. Most local codes permit 14% grades on residential driveways and 10% on local streets. Site SDecific Comments A study of the development plans in the area of units 33 through 42 reveals slopes exceeding 15%, but the plan is well designed considering the topography, views from the dwellings, roadway grades, driveway grades, sanitary sewer system, stormwater management system and general clearing and grading. The 15% slopes in this area are generally associated with (a) the Long Island Sound bluff to the north, (b) a fall toward the wetlands to the east, (c) a short, east to west, change in grade in the areas of units 33 & 34 and (d) a short, east to west, change of grade in the area of units 40 & The slope (2.a.) to the Long Island Sound beach is not affected by the development. The topographical survey indicates that the land slopes southerly or southwesterly away from the crest of the bluff. The development plan does not direct any storm water runoff to the crest of the bluff. c. The dwellings are setback at least 100 feat from the bluff. The slope (2.b.) falling toward the wetlands is interrupted by a terrace area at the existing travelled road. a. This slope is wooded. Unit 39 is in this area, but a careful review of the development plan indicates moderate driveway/roadway grades, well designed transition slopes and Iow profile retaining walls. The floor elevation of unit 39 is 3 feet before the top of the bluff and 10 feet above the terrace at the existing travelled road to the east. d. Storm water runoff is properly managed. All appropriate erosion control management techniques will be implemented during construction. The other 15% slopes (2.c. and 2.d.) are of minimal size and are not development obstacles. These slopes ara valuable as they lend character to the area and provide vertical separation of some of the dwellings. 2 In general, the slopes in this area enhance its uniqueness, visual interest, privacy, gracious living, serenity and value. Few areas of the North Shore offer a better residential setting. There are no unique concerns in this area with regard to the construction of the dwellings, roads, drives, sewers,water mains, etc. The development plan indicates that unit 83 is proposed to be constructed in the area of an existing travelled road, where the slope is less than 10%. The floor elevation of this dwelling is 5 feet below the top of the bluff. The Iow profile retaining wall westerly of this unit is utilized mainly for aesthetic value and to manage the erosion caused by the existing travelled road. The Review suggests "Steep artificial slopes also should be minimized wherever possible" The development plans, generally, indicate "new" slopes not greater than 1:4 (25%). Low profile retaining walls are utilized, sparingly, to aid in stabilizations and to help lessen the amount of clearing and grading. Retaining walls and moderate slopes with creative planting lend character to this development. 3 PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD AT GREENPORT, TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK EROSION CONTROL PLAN YOUNG & YOUNG PLANNING, ENGINEERING, & LAND SURVEYING RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK JULY 20,1998 I. Erosion Control Measures During construction and until adequate stabilization is achieved, the following erosion control measures will be implemented. 1. Silt fence and hay bales Silt fence and hay bales will be placed as shown on the plan and at any other location where runoff and sediment may adversely affect the wetland or natural vegetation. 2. Diversion swales Diversion swales will be constructed upland of the silt fence to intercept stormwatar runoff; for example, a diversion swale will be constructed northerly of units 33 & 34 to divert runoff to the natural Iow area between units 32 & 33 and a diversion swale or swales will be constructed along the travelled road below units 39 & 40. 3. Sediment basins Sediment basins will be constructed to receive runoff and sediment from the diversion swales and all other areas where sediment may accumulate. Sediment basins will be maintained until adequate stabilization is achieved. 4. Retaining walls Retaining walls are utilized to lessen slopes and provide additional stabilization. 5. Dust control Dust control measures shall be implemented particularly during times of drought. II. Construction Schedule The potential for erosion will be greatly reduced by the proper sequence of construction. The following order of construction will be implemented: 1. Silt fence and haybales installed. 2. Temporary diversion swales and sediment basins constructed, 3. Retaining walls constructed. 4. "New" transition slopes graded, 5. Transition slopes topsoiled and seeded. General clearing and grading completed. 7. Temporary and/or permanent drainage structures installed. 8, Roadway stabilized and roadway drainage structures installed. Dwellings and other buildings constructed. All disturbed areas outside of the immediate building footprints topsoiled and seeded. Stockpiles 1. Soils will not be stockpiled in sensitive areas. 2. Stockpiles will be surrounded by silt fencing and/or placed in areas where the silts will be retained naturally. 2 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY EVALUATION OF THE CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD GREENPORT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Prepared by: Greenhouse Consultants 40 Exchange Place, 13th Floor New York, New York, 10005 July 1998 INTRODUC~ON The purpose of this study is to document the potential prehistoric and historic sensitivity of the proposed Continuing Care Retirement Community project known as Peconic Landing at Southold located at Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York through the review of existing archival, cartographic and published references. To provide a context for evaluating any identified resources within the parcel itself, the survey will include a synthesis of published and unpublished prehistoric and historic resources in the immediate area surrounding the project area. The project area consists of approximately 145 acres situated north of Village of Greenport and west of East Marion. The proposed development will impact sixty to sixty-five acres of land within zones of potential archaeological sensitivity. The plans call for 8.9 acres of buildings, plus an existing building of 0.6 acres; 12.8 acres of paved surfaces, including roads and parking; and 24 acres of lawns and landscaping; plus an additional 24 acres of landscaping impacts which include a previously disturbed mine or quarry site. The organization of this study is as follows: first, a section describes the geography and physical setting of the project area; second, a section follows on the prehistoric sensitivity of the area; and third, a review of the historic sensitivity of the area. GEOGRAPHY AND PHYSICAL SETTING The geomorphology of Long Island is primarily characterized by the Ronkonkoma moraine, which extends from the Nassau County line to Montauk Point. 13edrock is overlain by the Cretaceous Raritan fo,~ation and the Magothy formation. The Raritan is composed of the Lloyd Sand member and an upper clay member. In the southwest portion of Suffolk County the Magothy formation is overlain by Jameco gravel, while outside of this area it is overlain by the marine Gardiners clay (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975:98). The climate of Suffolk County is humid-continental. The diurnal and annual temperature has a reduced range due to the moderating influence of the ocean. In general the freeze-free growing season is 200-210 days. However, the inland section is different due to the sea breeze only penetrating the island from five to eight miles (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975:96). The soils at the Peconic Landing at Southold project area are Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (HaA), Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (Ha.B), Riverhead sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes (RdA) and Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes (Rd13). The Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (HaA) is found on outwash plains. Some of this soil type are found on moraines. They are usually situated on top of low-lying hills. The general soil profile includes an A1 horizon of 0 to 3 inches with a dark grayish-brown (10YR4/2) loam, a B21 horizon of 3 to 10 inches, brown to dark-brown (7.5YR4/4) loam; a B22 horizon of 10 to 19 inches, strong-brown (7.5YR5/6) loam and a 1323 horizon of 19 to 28 inches with a yellowish-brown (10YR5/6) gravelly loam (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975:Sheet Number 3; 71-72). Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (HaB) is usually found on outwash plains and moraines, along shallow, intermittent drainage channels (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975:Sheet Number 3; 72). The Riverhead sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes (RdA) is found on outwash plains. The general soil profiles includes an Ap horizon of 0 to 12 inches, dark to dark-brown (10YR4/3) sandy loam; a B2 horizon of 12 to 27 inches, 2 strong-brown (7.5YR5/6) sandy loam and a B31 horizon of 27 to 32 inches, yellowish-brown (10YRS/4) loamy sand. Many of the Riverhead soils have a thin loamy sand horizon in the lower part of the B horizon with the same color range as the upper part (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975:Sheet Number 3; 81-82). Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes (RdB) is found on moraines and outwash plains. It lies in areas along shallow, intermittent drainageways (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975:Sheet Number 3; 83). The geomorphologic character of the Town of Southold has been significantly altered through time. The mainland portion of Southold was originally three islands, which through time have been connected to each other by land resulting from alluvial formation (Thompson 1962:I28). Around ca. 1840 Thompson wrote that the north shore cliff (opposite Greenport), washed away at its base, exposing its stratigraphy (ibid.:40). The Harbor Hill moraine lies against the north shore of the island from Mt. Sinai Harbor to Orient Point. No bays exist and the shoreline is smooth in contrast to the neck section of the north shore, further west. The moraine ridge is visible from Wading River to Orient Point, to the north of the highway as it crosses the outwash plain which has numerous kettles. That is, it is visible until Mattituck and Orient Point the Harbor Hill ridge has been destroyed by water erosion and the outwash plain descends to sea level. The moraine reemerges on Plum Island (Van Diver 1985:71-72). Our Field Supervisor visited the project area during May 1998. The property is vacant. The parcel is covered with trees and undergrowth. 3 PREHISTORIC SENSITMTY As part of the project evaluation process, this sensitivity study has surveyed the files of the New York State Museum Division of Historical and Anthropological Services, and material on file at Greenhouse Consultants. The area searched was a two mile radius centered on the project area. One prehistoric site is known within two miles of the project area. It was reported by former New York State Archaeologist, Arthur C. Parker, early in this century, and is described in his text. The only site found during our search is New York State Museum site 4885. This is Parker's site ACP-SUFK-16. It is located approximately 0.8 miles southeast of the project area near Greenport. Parker describes the site as a village and shell midden along Greenport harbor and east of Greenport village (Parker 1922:698). Parker does not offer a date range for this site or describe any artifacts recovered. The date range may include the Woodland period based on Parker's description of it as a village. This settlement pattern was rare during the preceding Archaic and Paleo-Indian periods. See A in Figure 2. In terms of potential prehistoric sensitivity, the project impact area was evaluated from two points of view: the proximity of known prehistoric sites in or near the project area; the presence of flesh water drainage courses in general, and particularly the identification of river or stream confluence situations where two or more drainages come together, providing access to both water and food supplies of both systems. This survey has documented the recorded or published location of one site within a two mile radius of the project area. The project area is the location of two natural kettle ponds. Archaeological sites are known adjacent to other such ponds along the north shore of Long Island. Two sites exist in Riverhead near Hallock's Pond and the pond near Luce Landing. The ponds on the project area would have provided a source of fresh water, as well as 4 attracting game. hunting camp. This makes the project area a possible location for a HISTORIC SENSITIVITY At the time of European contact, the Corchaug tribe used the area from Wading River to Orient, from the north shore of Peconic Bay through the Necks. The Manhasset tribe was on Shelter Island, Ram Island and possibly Hog Island (Thompson 1962:I:126o127). Shell heaps from Native American occupation were present in Stirling in the 1840s (ibid. II:254). On April 22, 1636, King Charles I requested that the Plymouth Company of New England issue their patent to William Alexander, Earl of Stirling, for Long Island and its adjacent islands. The earl gave a power of attorney to James Farter on April 20, 1637, appointing Farret as agent to manage and dispose of these lands. William Alexander was born in 1580 and was made Earl in 1636. He died in 1640, his eldest son predeceasing him (Thompson 1962:I: 165;I1:211), In 1640, a group of men from New Haven bought Yennecock, which was the peninsula extension of Southold east of Cutchogue, Robbin's Island, Plum[bi Island, Great and Little Gull Islands, and Fisher's Island from the Corchoug tribe. The exact date of the purchase is unknown due to documentation not surviving. They arrived in September of 1640, and included Rev. John Youngs, Isaac Arnold, dohn Budd, Jacob Corey, 6ohn Conkling, Matthias Corwin, Peter Hallock, Barnabas Horton, Thomas Mapes, Richard Terry, John Tuthill, William Welles, and their families (Flint 1967:234). Wells was a lawyer from Norfolk, England and Horton was the wealthiest of the settlers (Hazelton 1925:694-695). The settlers made Southold, a New Haven colony from 1640~1662, the oldest English settlement on Long Island. New Haven was merged into Connecticut by 1662, which was opposed by the Southolders, who disliked the charter (Thompson 1962:II:235-236). With a similar degree of protest, Southold was absorbed into New York jurisdiction on October 31, 1676 (Flint 1967:238; Thompson 1962:II:239-241). Under New York jurisdiction the present Town of Southold was originally part of Yorkshire. Yorkshire was divided by the Act of 1683 and the East Riding was renamed Suffolk County. The original Suffolk towns were: Easthampton to Montauk Point, Shelter Island, the Isle of Wight, Fisher's Island, Plum[b] Island, Huntington, Smithfield, Brookhaven, Southampton, and Southold. River Head was separated from Southold by an Act of Legislature on March 13, 1792 (Flint 1967:223; Thompson 1962:I1:273). 6 Greenport, East Marion and Orient lie on the narrow neck of the North Fork, former participants in the whaling industry of the nineteenth century. Greenport was founded in 1827. Captain Webb originally owned the site of the village and the property was sold by his heirs to three neighbors (Thompson 1962:II:251). In the first quarter of the twentieth century the area was described as covered with farms with evidence of fisheries and remnants from the whaling days. It also had a budding tourist industry during the summer months (Hazelton 1925:714). David Floyd constructed Brecknock Hall between 1850 and 1857. The Italianate mansion was made of stone, most of which was mined on the 'property. The ground were famously landscaped into gardens and fountains. It was a large estate and supposedly self-supporting. David Floyd was the grandson of General William Floyd, the only Long Islander to sign the Declaration of Independence. David Floyd was involved in shipping, whaling, banking and real estate. The ancestry of the Floyd family on Long Island begins with Richard Floyd, a Welshman, who resided at Setauket in 1656, and became the owner of a large landed estate. Brecknock Hall remained in the hands of the Floyd family for nearly one hundred years, while the property went into decline. The property was originally in the hands of John Youngs (Thompson 1962:III:358-370; Brecknock Hall Society 1994; Corwin and Corwin 1972:40; Case 1876:11-12) 7 Cartographic Evidence A series of maps depicting the project area and surroundings during the nineteenth were collected as part of this research. The earliest depiction found is the 1829 Burr map. See Figure 3. The project area is part of vacant land to the northwest of the road, now known as N.Y.S. Route 25. The location is labeled "Rocco Point." This title is a corruption of "Rocky Point" and refers to the point of land to the northeast. The 1842 Mather map also shows the project area as vacant land. This map shows the settlements of Greenport and Stifling. The main road, now N.Y.S. Route 25, is shown as are a few other roads. Rocky Point is correctly labeled. See Figure 4. Figure 5 is taken from the 1855 U.S. Coast Survey. Several changes are evident since 1842. There are now several structures along the northwestern side of the main road. Two of these appear to be within the out-parcel. These are in the center of three properties and are probably Brecknock Hall and an outbuilding. The other two structures appear to lie within the project area near to N.Y.S. Route 25. A pond is shown within the project area near to the shoreline. Figure 6 presents part of the 1873 Beers Atlas. The project area appears to include one structure labeled "D.G. Floyd." A second structure appears close to the main road within the out-parcel. This is probably the Floyd house, Brecknock Hall. The structure within the project area is probably a barn. Just outside the project area to the southwest is another structure near to the road. This may be associated with two additional structures labeled "B. Wiggins." To the northeast of the project area is a structure close to the road labeled "J.H, Wiggins." The pond within the project area continues to be shown. The final map, the 1896 Hyde map, is presented here in part as Figure 7. This map is somewhat diagrammatic, so it is not possible to place the project area on it with accuracy. The pond is not shown. A row of structures is shown along the northwestern side of the main road. Those in the vicinity of the project area are labeled "D.G. Floyd Est., .... Grace Floyd" and "H.M. Jerome." 8 In summary, it is clear that a number of farms were developed along the main road during the nineteenth century. These are sparse during the 1840s but occupy nearly all of the northwestern side of the road by 1896. The project area itself appears to remain vacant until circa 1855, when structures appear along the road. These include Brecknock Hall in the out- parcel, but also other nearby structures within the project area. These appear to be owned by the Floyd family. 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY Brecknock Hall Society 1994 Brecknock Hall. Case, Pdbertson Esq. 1876 Historical Sketch of Southold Town. Reprint of speech delivered by the Town Clerk at the Celbration in Greenport, L.I., On July 4th, 1876. Col-win, E.K. and P.L. 1972 Greenport Yesterday and Today. Flint, Martha B. 1967 Long Island Before the Revolution. A Colonial Study. Ira J. Friedman, Inc., Port Washington, N.Y. Originally published 1896, Early Long Island. Hazelton, Henry I. 1925 The Boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens Counties of Nassau and Suffolk, Long Island, New York 1609-1924. Volume II. New York: Lewis Historical Publishing Company, Inc. Parker, Arthur C. 1922 The Archaeological History of New York. New York State Museum Bulletin, Nos. 235-238. Thompson, Benjamin F. 1962 History of Long Island From Its Discovery and Settlement to the Present 7~rne. 3rd ed. 3 vols. Port Washington, N.Y.: Ira J. Friedman, Inc. Originally published 1st ed. 1839. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975 Soil Survey of Suffolk County, New York Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. MAPS AND ATLASES Beers, Frederick W. 1873 Atlas of Long Island, New York from Recent and Actual Surveys and Records. New York: Beers, Comstock and Cline l0 Burr, David H. 1829 Map of the Coun~ of Suffolk Published by the Surveyor General pursuant to an Act of Legislature. Hyde and Company 1896 Map of Long Island. Brooklyn, New York: Hyde & Co. Mather, W.W. 1842 Geological Map of Long & Staten Islands. W.W. Mather. New York, New York: United States Coast Survey 1855 Middle Part of Long Island Sound. Directed by F.R. Hassler. United States Geological Survey 1956 Greenport, New York Quadrangle. 7.5 minute series topographic map. 1956 Orient, N. E-Conn. Quadrangle. 7.5 minute series topographic map. 1956 Southold, Ne~v York Quadrangle, 7.5 minute series topographic map. 3 ISLAND. ~' SOUND ~ SCALE 1:24000 Figure 1 ~o~at~o~ o~ the prgject area shown on.portions of .~. ~.u. /.b minute series Greenport and Orient, New York quadrangles, 1956. / ;LONG \ ~ Stiflir Green i Figure 2 Youngs Pt SCALE 1:24000 Known prehistoric sites within two miles of the project area. Project Figure 3 From the 1829 Burr map. Project Figure 4 From the 1842 Mather map. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 21,1998 James Warren, Historic Preservation, Program Analyst NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Peebles Island PO Box 189 Waterford, NY 12188-0189 RE: Review of Archaeological Evaluation for Peconic Landing at Southold Lffecare Community Main Road, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Warren, The enclosed archaeological evaluation is being sent to you for your review. This project supercedes a previously approved project named, "The Breakers". This project was a much more intensive project consisting of three hundred fifty condominium units. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me at this office. Site Plan Reviewer Encl. STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING ;>50 VETERANS iVIEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788'5518 CRAIG SIRACUSA, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR ~JOSEPH H. E~OARDNAN COMMISSIONER July 21, 1998 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert Young and Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Dear Mr. Wolpert: Your April 29. 1998 Submission Peconic Landines Route 25. Greenport Our Case No. 97-263 JUL g 1 1998 Southold Town Planning Board This is in regard to the site plans and traffic study for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to issuing a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: Traffic Study 1. Table 1 should be revised. 24 hour two-way volume has to be included. 2. Report did not discuss need for an eastbound left tuna lane at the two proposed access points. 3. What off site improvements are recommended. Site Plan 1. Please prepare a separate existing conditions drawing for Rotue 25 and show proposed improvements. 2. All work on the State highway must include NYSDOT item numbers and details. 3. Show pavement widths, shoulder widths, curb and sidewalk details, existing signs, hydrants, drainage, etc. 4. Show basin resetting details. Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert July 21, 1998 Page 2 5. Show shoulder and intersection paving details and cross section. 6. Provide drainage on 25. 7. Show intersection profiles and frame and grate details for drainage structures on both driveways. 8. All drainage must be contained on site. 9. A maintenance and protection of traffic plan is necessary. All lanes must be open to traffic from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. No lane closures are permitted on weekends or holidays. Please submit four sets of revised plans. The subject material will be reviewed by Mr. Dan Herlihy of my staff. He can be contacted at 952- 6020 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Very truly yours, O tnal By TH ]MAS F. OELERICH THOMAS F. OELEI:~CD, P.E. Regional Traffic Engineer Attachment Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southol&.,~'"'" '" CC: TFO:DH:JS Ewing Cole July 17, 1998 C~rry Brott Architects Interior Designers Planners Federal Reserve Bank Building Independence MallWest 100North 6th Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106-1590 215.923.2020 Fax 215.574.9163 Mr. Robert G. Kassner Southold Planning Department Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Bob: Re: Peeonic Landing Project No. 97012 We are pleased to submit the enclosed material for the Peconic Landing Project to the Architectural Review Committee. We have provided you with three drawing packages, one each for the Cottages, the Apartment, and the Community and Health Center. The Cottage drawings include all 4 elevations of each of the three units, and a colored front elevation for each. The Apartment drawings include plans of the resident floors and typical elevations for the building (see the first floor plan for a key to the location of the elevations). We have colored two areas of the elevation at a larger scale, and have included one typical section through the building. The Community and Health Center drawings include all the floor plans and elevations. Also included are various model photos of this building, the larger scale model shows general massing and fenestration, the detail model shows materials and color. The elevation drawings have been prepared for pricing purposes, the product samples are the materials currently being considered for the project. The model photos have been prepared for design review and we have annotated this material for your use and review. For our public review we intend to present the two models, material samples (including those we have included in this transmittal) and colored elevation drawings of the major components of the project. Please let us know what other information we need to prepare for the public review. Very truly yours, EWING COLE CHERRY BROTT R~ell, RA Direct Dial 215.625.4402 RMC:ams/ga Attachments cc: Messrs. J. Dussling, T. Lewis, J. Woolford - U. S. Retirement Communities, L.P. Phi[adelllhi, I, PA Washington, D( Haddonfield, N] 3TATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION STATE OFfiCE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIal HIGHWAY HauPPauge, N.Y. II788-5518 Craig SIRACUSA, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN COMMISSIONER July 10, 1998 Mr. Ronaid Hill, P.E. Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, New York 11978 Dear Mr. Hill: Your April 20. 1998 Breakers at Lands End Route 25. Greenport We have reviewed the information in our file regarding your concerns for the time required to complete our review. Subsequent to your letter of April 20, 1998, we were notified by the Town of Southold that the Breakers at Lands End project was being replaced by another project called Peconic Landings, an adult assisted-living residential complex. Mr. Dan Herlihy of my staffhas kept you informed of the project's status and the current Peconic Landings project. We have put the Breakers at Lands End project on hold to coordinate the review process with the Town of Southold. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By THOMAS F. OELERICH THOMAS F. OELEPdCH, ?,E. Regional Traffic Engineer CC~ Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town ofSouthold ~ JUL 15 1998 Southold Town Planning Board" pLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEOP,~E RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 14, 1998 Terence G. Lewis, Sr. US Retirement Communities 101 Chesley Drive Media, PA 19063-1761 RE: Proposed site plan for Peconie Landing at Southold SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lewis: As discussed at the Board's work session on July 13, 1998, the Board received its consultant's report too late on Monday to review all the recommendations. A copy of this report was given to you at the meeting for your review. When you have had a chance to review it, please contact me and I will arrange a special meeting to resolve the issues raised in the consultant's report. If the Architectural Review Committee has completed its work, perhaps both matters could be discussed at this meeting. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. ~R~b-e~4t GL Kassner Site Plan Reviewer cc: Charles J. Voorhis Kenneth Abruzzo, Young & Young Mr. Bennett Oflowski, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 NBI. BON~ I=OlaB & VOORHI~ LLC CHARLES d VOORHIS, CEP. AICP · ARTHUR J KOERBSR, RE. * VINCENT G, DONNELLY, PE · VICTOR BERT, PE · JOSEPH R EPIFANIA FE · ROBERTG.NELSON JR, PT · CHRISTOPHER W ROBINSON. RE July 13, 1998 JUL 1 3 1998 Southold Town Planning Board Re; Review of Response to Comments on Long EAF, Part 3 Peconic Landing at Southold SCTM No. 1000-035-1-25 N&P No. 97291 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, we have completed a review of the Response to Comments on the Long EAF, Part 3 submitted for the above referenced project. The LEAF, Parts 1 and 3 were originally submitted in September 1997, and the Town requested revision of the Part 3 based on our review of November 14, 1997. Several issues were raised within the initial review letter, and it was determined that additional discussion was required to assess the potential impacts of the proposed project. The Response to Comments on the Long EAF submitted by the applicant is intended to provide the information requested. Specifically, the Town requested that the expanded Long EAF include the following: · A topographic survey with slope analysis, · A hydrological study of the drainage basins on site, with discussion of the potential impacts to the existing wetlands, · Further information on the planting design of the proposed stormwater detention basin, · Further discussion of mitigation of impacts to wetland vegetation, · Exploration of options for wetland restoration and design, · Exploration of alternative stormwater systems which would not involve extensive grading in and adjacent to the existing wetland, Documentation from the Natural Heritage Program on rare species, Further discussion of the archaeological and historic resources on site, · Preparation of a vegetation/habitat map, and · Delineation of the water supply easement. Page 1 572 WALT WF'ilTMAN ROAD. MELVILLE, NY 11747-~I~11~ Peconlc Landing ~ Greenport Response to Comments Review n A reference list of sources of environmental documentation was also requested, as none was provided in the submitted Long EAF. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) also reviewed the proposed project in a letter of November 26, 1997, which is appended to the Response to Comments. Most of the NYSDEC concerns were related to wetland impacts, as the ponds on site are subject to state jurisdiction under Article 24. The wetlands were delineated at the request of the NYSDEC, and the proposed site plan has been revised to minimize disturbance to the wetlands. The location of the buildings and roads remains the same as under the original plan, but the proposed stormwater system has been redesigned so that no alteration of existing wetlands will occur. The following review follows the format of the Response to Comments, with reference to the original Long EAF, Part 3 where applicable. The text of the Response to Comments includes only minimal discussion and fails to cite references as requested, but does provide the minimum information necessary to make a determination on the potential impacts of the proposed project. Some of the requested information has not been provided, but can be required prior to site plan approval. Slope Analysis The project site contains a variety of important local geologic features, including high bluffs along Long Island Sound and a swale with kettle ponds running through the center of the property. In addition, there are limited areas of steep slopes elsewhere on site, including an excavated pit in the c~otral portion of the site. The areas of steep slopes are shown on a plate attached to the Response to Comments. The slope analysis shows that construction will occur in areas with slopes from 10 to 15 and over 15 percent, although disturbance within 100 feet of the two wetland boundaries will not occur under the revised plan. Town Code does not consider areas with slopes over 15 percent as "buildable land", and it would be desirable to further revise the site plan to reduce the impact to these areas. The Response to Comments indicates that only the community center and eight of the proposed units will be located in areas with slopes over 15 percent, however, several other units and paved areas are also situated on small areas of steep slopes. The primary area in which steep slopes are a concem is in the nortbem portion of the site just west of the northernmost pond. The steep slopes are associated with both the bluff overlooking Long Island Sound and the sides of the swale. The eight units which are identified in the Response to Comments as situated on steep slopes are located in this area, and oonstmction of these units has the potential to result in significant impacts to both the adjacent bluff and the wetland system to the east. As currently proposed, extensive filling and construction of retaining walls would be necossa~. The Town may wish to consider requiring that the applicant relocate at least some of the proposed units to minimize impacts to steep slopes. Relocated units could be situated in the southeastern corner of the site with only minor revision to the site plan, and slight reconfiguration of tho inner roadways would allow other locations as well. Relocation will reduce the number of units which can be located along the bluff, which are likely to be most desirable to potential occupants. At least one additional unit with views of Long Island Sound could be located in the northeastern corner of the site through the use of a shared dtive~vay near unit 89, and a limited Page 2 Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Response to Comments Review number of units could be located in the area of proposed units 36 and 37 or within the loop which would serve these units under the proposed plan. The proposed project would also result in construction of a retaining wall near proposed unit 83, which is located on the east slope of the northernmost wetland. Reennfiguration of the site plan in this area would also be desirable, and the area of steep slopes could be largely avoided by shifdng units 78 through 83 slightly t~ the south. There are other areas of steep slopes located throughout the site, however, the potential impacts of construction on these smaller areas is less than for the area along the bluffand pond. The proposed community center will require filling ora small kettle depression between the two ponds, however, this area has already been significantly disturbed and docs not contain wetland species. Although erosion might also occur during construction in this area, sediments would be better contained and adjacent features would not be impacted. Construction of the proposed stormwater system within the existing mined basin would also occur in a manner which will retain soils on site. The slopes surrounding the southern wetland would undergo only minor alteration under the currently proposed plan. Thus, it is recommended that only the relocation of units 33 through 42 and unit 83 be considered, and that construction in other areas in steep slopes be allowed. Erosion control measures will be necessary throughout the site, and a detailed erosion control plan should be required. Several areas of artificial slopes in excess of 20 percent will be created on site, and stabilization of these areas should be outlined. Steep artificial slopes should be minimized where possible, but will be necessary in some areas because of existing steep slopes and in order to minimize clearing. As is discussed in the Response to Comments, the proposed grade, planting of vegetation and construction of retaining walls will provide long range slope stabilization, however, there is significant potential for erosion of soils during construction. The Response to Comments contains several generalized recommendations for erosion control and stabilization of soils, but a more detailed erosion control plan should be developed, particularly for the area surrounding the existing wetlands and along the bluff. The Town should require a detailed erosion control plan as part of the final approval, to be submitted for review by the Town Engineer. This plan should inehide the detailed implementation of the recommendations presented in the Response to Comments. In addition to these measures, consideration should be given to construction of a boardwalk and planting of beach grass or similar vegetation along the dune at the base of the swale. This area will provide beach access, and is enrrenfly unvegetated with significant potential for erosion. Such acoess should be made a condition of final approval of the project, and would also be preferable for residents with limited mobility. HvdroGeolo~v and Potential Wetland lmoacts/Stormwater Management The initial review of the Long EAF, Part 3 asked that the project sponsor assess the potential impact of the proposed project on the hydrology of the wetland systems on site. The hydrogeologic study performed for the Response to Comments shows the contributing basins for the two wetland ponds are relatively small, and thus the quantity of surface runoff contributing to the systems is minimal. The document concludes that the ponds are primarily groundwater fed, which should minimize the hydrogeologic impact of the proposed project on the wetland areas. As relatively little development is proposed within the sub-basins which contribute run-off to the two ponds, only slight change in the amount of runoff entering the two systems is expected. The runoff entering the northern basin would be reduced from 14,400 cubic feet to 13,800 cubic feet per inch Page Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Response to Comments Review of rainfall, a change of only 800 cubic feet, or 5.5 percent. The reduction of runoff entering the southern wetland basin would be reduced from 10,000 cubic feet to 7,560 cubic feet, a reduction of approximately 24.4 percent. As stormwater runoff likely represents only a small portion of water entering the system and water levels are probably determined primarily by depth to groundwater, these changes are not expected to be significant. Redirection of roof runoff or other relatively clean runoff into the southern wetland might be coasidered, but does not appear necessary. Stonnwater from the proposed project will be diverted to a positive overflow stormwater detention basin in the southern portion of the site. The system will include a biofiltratinn system consisting of series of detention ponds connected by open channels which will provide a visual amenity as well as additional aquatic habitat. Under the original site plan, this system would have been connected to the more pristine ponds on site, but at the request of the NYSDEC the site plan has been revised and no alteration of the existing wetlands will occur. One of the proposed detention ponds would be excavated to a level below groundwater, while the ~naining pools will be lined with less permeable soils. Wetland vegetation will be planted to filter sediment and reduce the pollutant load from stormwater runoff. The proposed stormwater system is well designed, and the revised site plan should minimize impacts to both groundwater and surface water on site. As was discussed in the initial review, drainage calculations were not included in information received by this office, so a determination of capacity can not be made. This information should be submitted to the Planning Board as part of the final site plan for review by the Town engineer. The desirability of the proposed bioflltration system was recognized in the initial review, however, additional information on the planting design of the proposed stormwater detention basin was requested. This information was not provided in the Response to Comments, and a planting plan should be part of the final site plan approval. Wetland plantings may have a high failure rate if the system is not properly designed, particularly given the proximity of the disturbed wetland on site, which is domiuated by the invasive common reed (Phragmites australis). Freshwater Wetlands As was discussed above, the proposed project has been revised so that excavation within the existing wetlands will not occur. Under the revised plan there would be no connection between the proposed stormwater retention system and the southernmost wetland, and the proposed grading would not allow overflow from the new system to the natural area. The site plan was revised primarily in response to concerns raised by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), a4s well as within our initial review letter. An Article 24 Freshwater Wetland Permit was filed with the NYSDEC, and relevant correspondence is appended to the Response to Comments. The NYSDEC has indicated that no excavation would be allowed within the wetlands, and that 100' buffer must be maintained around the existing wetland as delineated by the applicant and confirmed by the NYSDEC. Footpaths would be allowed within the 100' buffer, provided that the trails are made of wood chips or similar materials, and that there is minimal clearing or pruning of the natural vegetation. Removal of thc existing common reed (Phragmttes australis) to restore the nor'ahem wetland was originally proposed, although the Response to Comments indicates that the project sponsor does not intend restoration of the wetland at this time. The letter from the NYSDEC indicates that this would be allowed with a wetland permit from the New York State NYSDEC, which would include Page 4 Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Response to Comments Review a detailed wetland planting plan. The Response to Comments states that the applicant would file a wetland application to the NYSDEC if restoration oftbe northern wetland is desired at a later date. The Town of Southold has issued a letter of non jurisdiction of the wetlands on site, and thus further environmeraal review will be primarily the responsibility of the NYSDEC. As long as the proposed project conforms to NYSDEC regulations for disturbance within thc wetland boundary and erosion of sedimonts into the wetland is controlled, significant impacts to the wetlands are not expected. Thc NYSDEC letter does indicate that thc existing roadway near the northern wetland can be convened to a grass walking path, and that erosion structures would be required for construction within 100 feet of either thc tidal and freshwater wetlands. Erosion control measures and recommendations for walking paths within the 100' buffer of the proposed wetlands should be incorporated into the site final plan for the proposed project. Some erosion control is shown on thc current plan. Venetation Man The initial review of the Long EAF, Part 3 requested that a vegetation map be prepared, and a map has been provided as a plate appended to the Response to Comments. In addition, the site survey and proposed site plan show generalized areas of existing of proposed vegetation. These resources should be utilized in preparation of a final landscaping plan as part of the final approval of the proposed project. The landscaping plan should clearly delineate areas to be preserved as natural vegetation, including clusters of existing trees as well as areas of shrnb vegetation. Such areas are outlined on the conceptual plan, but a more detailed landscaping plan would insure that these areas are preserved. The Town should also require that these areas be clearly delineated within the field durin~ construction to minimize the likelihood of inadvertent clearing. Wildlife and Habitats The original Long EAF Part III provided information on rare habitats, but omitted the list from the NYS Natural Heritage Program of rare plant occurrences within the area. This list has been provided in the Response to Comments, and records of several rare plants have been documented in the area of the site. An analysis of the likelihood of each plant species being on site based on habitat preferences and the dates of occurrence should have been prepared as pact of the Response to Comments, but will be briefly discussed here. Most of the plants Y~ed have only historic records within the area, and the majority are wetland species. If rare wetland species are present on site, they would be preserved within the proposed wetland and wetland buffer. Seabeach knotweed is not a wetland plant, but would be expected to be confined to the beach at the base of the bhiffif present, and would not be impacted. Thus, only thc upland species are of concern, which include the starwort, smooth tick-clover, Nuttall's tick clover, velvet panic grass, small-flowered pearlwort and pink wildbean, all of which are facultative uplnd plant or unlisted under the Federal wetland plant classification. Although rare within the state, none of these upland spccics has been granted status as a protected plant, and all are considered globally secure. Only historical records are known for these upland species with the exception of the wildbean, for which no record of occurrence is known in the local area although Page 5 Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Response to Comments Review suitable habitat is present. Thus, it is unlikely that they are present on site given thc existing disturbance and early successional habitats. Th~ Long EAF indicates that Lamont (1997) did not find any of these species on site, although there is no reference for this citation. The Town may wish to require the project sponsor to provide a written statement or referenced citation from Lamont, who is recognized as a local authority on rare plants. Regardless, bnscd on the above discussion and thc assertion that Lamont did not identify rare plants on site, the occurrence of rare plants in the vicinity as recorded by the Natural Heritage Program should not preclude development as proposed. Cultural Resources The Response to Comments indicates that a Stage lA archeologieal sensitivity study is currently being prepared, but no discussion of archeologieal or historic resources on site is presented in either the Response to Comments or the original long EAF Part III. This study should be received and sent to the State for review prior to approval of the proposed project. As was discussed in the initial review, there are historic resources on site, and the presence of water suggests that archeolngical artifacts might also be presenL The applicant has indicated that the historic Brecknock Hall will be retained under the proposed project, however, development of this area for retail use would be allowed under the existing zoning. The Town may wish to include a covenant on the approval of the proposed project to ensure that this structure is protected. Traffic The initial review suggested several changes in the methodology of the traffic study contained in the Long EAF, Part III. The primary comment on the original traffic study was that other planned development within the area was not considered in prediction of the future build conditions. In addition, the original traffic study analyzed Friday traffic, which is atypical of an average day, and utilized incorrect multipliers for traffic generation and the outdated highway capacity software. The traffic study has been revised and submitted to the Town, and the issues raised within the initial review have been addressed. The full traffic analysis summaries are not presented within the Response to Comments, and the Town may wish to have the full study reviewed by the Town Engineer. The conclusions of the study as presented in the Response to Comments suggest that the proposed project will not result in significant deterioration of traffic conditions within the area. The overall intersections studied are still expected to have a Level of Service of A under full build conditions. Northbound turn movements from Main Street on the westbound main road will be reduced from a Level of Service B to a Level of Service C under build conditions, however, this is generally considered an acceptable Level of Service. Thus, the traffic generated by the proposed project is not expected to significantly impact local traffic conditions. Other Issues The NYSDEC raised other minor issues in their letter of November 26, 1997, which should be addressed on the final site plan. First, the letter asks that if irrigation wells are proposed, they be Page 6 Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Response to Comments Review included on the final site plan. Thc letter also asks that thc Long EAF establish whether or not the Gr~enport Sewage Treatment Plant is able to accept the proposed increase in influent. A letter from the S~ver District should be required prior to approval of the proposed project. Other issues discussed in this l~J~r, such as the requirement that the wetland be delineated and that a planting plan be required, have bo~n discussod or included on the current site plan. The water supply east~nent was delineated on the boundary survey submitted with thc proposed site plan, but has not ~ included on the overall site plan as requested. Conclusions As was discussed in the initial review, the proposed project appears to be well designed and incorporates substantial mitigation measures, however, the subject site is a highly sensitive parcel with wetland areas, historic resources, a bluff along Long Island Sound and scenic resources. The Response to Comments on the Part III Long EAF presents a hard look at the potential environment impacts, and can be used as a basis for determination of significance. There are several issues which remain or which should be addressed prior to approval of a final site plan, but which would not preclude issuance of a Negative Declaration if the board is in agreement with this review. These issues to be addressed at a later stage of the review process include the following: If possible, the proposed site plan should be revised to limit the number of units which are placed in areas with slopes over 15%. In particular, structures 33-42 to the west of the northernmost pond should be relocated or eliminated. In addition, Unit 83 should be considered for relocation to avoid destabilization of steep slopes adjacent to the wetlands. Steep artificial slopes also should be minimized wherever possible. These issues can be considered during final site plan approval. Some erosion control measures are included in the proposed site plan and are discussed in the Response to Comments, however, a detailed erosion control plan should be presented and reviewed by the Town Engineer prior to site plan approval. This would ensure that only minimal impacts to the proposed wetlands and bluff occur, as well as preventing loss of mils elsewhere on site. n Drainage calculations for the proposed stormwater system should be required as part of the final site plan for review by the Town Engineer. The NYSDEC has questioned whether or not the Greenport Sewage Treatment Plant is able to accept the proposed increase in influent. A letter from the Sewer District should be required prior to approval of the proposed project. The NYSDEC has also indicated that if irrigation wells are proposed, a well permit must be obtained and the wells must be indicated on the final site plan. Page 7 Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Response to Comments Review The proposed site plan has been revised to protect the existing wetlands on site, and NYSDEC approval will be necessm3, for any construction within 100 feet of either feature. NYSDEC regulations should be sufficient to protect the two wetlands, however, the Town should ensure that these requirements are met for the proposed project. Permits will be required for any future activity such as the restoration of the common reed portion of the northern wetland, A landscaping plan which incorporates existing areas of natural vegetation and utilizes native species should be provided prior to final approval. The recommendations of the NYSDEC should also be incorporated. Areas to remain should be clearly flagged during construction and should be covenanted to remain natural as part of an overall site landscaped design. As was recommended in the initial review, the Town may wish to consider asking the applicant to develop best management strategies for limiting use of fertilizer and pesticides on site, which would further reduce the groundwater impacts of the proposed project. A Stage lA archeological study has been requested, but has not yet been submitted. This study should be sent to the State for review, and the Stage lB study undertaken if recommended. To ensure the existing historical structures are protected a covenant should be included in the final site plan approval which insures that Brecknock Hall be retained in the future. The southern portion of the site is zoned for Limited Business use and could be developed for retail purposes, although the project sponsor currently intends that the historic structure be retained. Although visual resources were not discussed in the Response to Comments, the original review of the Long EAF Part III suggests several mitigation measures which should be included in the final landscaping plan. These include preservation of a wooded buffer along the eastern portion of the site as well as the landscaped and overgrown areas along Route 25. Screening vegetation should also be incorporated along the boundaries of the residential out parcel along the southern border of the site near Brecknock Hall. The proposed project already includes a substantial scenic easement, which will project views from the roadway as well as from the historic structure. In Summaxy, as long as these issues are addressed, it is not expected that the proposed project will result in significant impacts to the environmental resources of the site. If you have any questions or wish any further input in regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Page 8 Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCTM#: 1000- Southold Town Planning Board Bob Kassner Town of Southold Town Hall, 5)095 Ma/n Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: June 16, 1998 JUL 0 6 1998 Southold Town Planning Board Utt'e Care Community Peconic Landing at Southold SCTM Mo. 1000-35-1-2.5 Environmental Review Services N&P Job No. 97291 Dear Bob: As per your request, this letter provides you with a proposal for environmental planning consulting services related to the above referenced project The ~llowing services &re proposed: Rovicw proj~t plan to determine if recommendations have bom incorporat~l into progn~scd developngnt. 2. Review Am~ded Part III Full EAF for content and adequacy. Pro~ddc letter of reeommeadatiou regarding I and 2 above, which would support a dctermiaation of significance by lhe Tovm Planning Board, Thc above services ca~ be completed for a lump sum fee of $450.00. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Very truly yours, Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP TOTRL P.02 November 5, 1997 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE 13UILDINO ~50 VLII:.RANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUOE, N.Y. I Mr. Robert G. Kasner Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Kasner: Peconic Landing at Southold N/S Route 25 Greenpor[ The traffic statement refers to peak hour traffic volumes, but does not differentiate between peak highway traffic and peak hour site generated traffic. No hourly information is provided to compare each peak hour, which can lead to confusion. As an example, does the Congregate Care Center never have more than one vehicle arrival and departure an hour in the morning? No provision is made for eastbound left turns into the site. No information is provided for the proposed use of the property zoned LB (Limited Business). No information is provided concerning the nearest signalized intersection to the west. A Traffic Impact Study is required. Please advise the applicant to contact Mr. Thomas Oelerich, Regional Traffic Engineer for Traffic Study requirements. For other questions, you may contact G. Beierling at 952-6128. Thank you for this opportunity to review, update and comment on this property development. Very truly yours, MICHAEL AZER Planning & Program Management We have reviewed the Long Environmental Assessment Form Narrative for the referenced development. We agree that the Southold Planning Board should continue acting as the SEQR lead agency. MSA:GB:JH CC: T. Oelerich, Traffic J. Hartofil, Traffic D. Herlihy, Traffic CHIEF WARREN JENSEN 1sT ASST. THOMAS R. WATKINS Sr. 2ND ASST. WAYDE T, MANWARING TREAS. K. LANGONE SECRETARY C. CAPRISE CHAPLAIN C. KUMJIAN October 31, 1997 Organized 1845 E.Mail - greenport-fd@juno.com (516) 477-9801 - STATION 1 (516) 477-1943 - CHIEFS OFFICE (516) 477-4012 - FAX/MESS P.O. SOX 58 THIRD STREET GREENPORT, NY 11944 Chairman Bennett Oflowski $outhold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Landing Dear Chairman; The Board of Fire Wardens and Chiefs of the Greenport Fire Department have reviewed the site plan for the above-mentioned property. It is the request of the Board that the width of all one-direction roads be changed to 17 feet. The Board also requests that a fire lane be located as indicated in blue on page 1 of 8 on the general layout. Additionally hydrants, noted in pink be added and hydrants, noted in orange be omitted. We additionally ask that all hydrants conform to ISO standards and that the entire complex conform to the NFPA 1141 standard for fire protection. The Board of Fire Wardens would also ask that the principals consider setting aside a 100' x 200' area for a possible future substation, which could contain 1 ambulance and 1 pumper truck. If you have any questions, you may leave a message for me at 477-4012. Chief WJ:cc Albert J. Kmpsld, President John Holzapfel, Vice President Jim King Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hail 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: RE: ~elissa Spiro Southold Town Board of Trustees October 14, 1997 Peconic Landing at Southold SCTM ~35-1-25 Please be advised that the Board of Trustees will review the site plan you submitted to us and will do an on-site inspection on Wednesday, October 22, 1997. We will give you our remarks shortly after the inspection. OCT I PLANNING BOARD NI~MBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Tolophone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 10, 1997 Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 RE: Environmental Review for Peconic Landing SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Voorhis: The Planning Board has received the $850 review fee for the above mentioned site plan. Please proceed with your review as outlined in your letter of October 2, 1997. The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on October 6, 1997. I have enclosed the Board's October 6, 1997 resolution and Lead Agency Coordination Request for your records. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the November 24, 1997 Planning Board meeting. Please submit your report no later than November 14, 1997, in order for the Board to review it before the meeting date. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions or require any additional information. Sincerely, Planner for Robert Kassner Site Plan Reviewer eric. Submission Without a Cover Letter S,d,j~et: P¢conlc chcq( in SCTM#: 1000- -~S- I- 2_~ Comments: J¢ 8EO. OCT PLANNING BOARD M~EMBERS 13ENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR, Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS K~ENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Albert Krupski, President, Trustees FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer RE: Peconic Landing at Southold Route 25, Greenport SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 October 7, 1997 DATE: Please review the attached site plan for areas under your jurisdiction. PLANNING BOARD M]EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWStCI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~NNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCI-IIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 F~x (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1997 Suffolk County Planning Commission 220 Rabro Ddve P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Attention: Gerard Newman, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Mapof ¢~.conlc LJ1Pdi~o/ S.C.D.P.W. Topo No.: S.C. Tax Map No.: 1000- ~.5' - I - 2.5' Major Sub.__ Minor Sub. MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plat (3 copies). Site Plan /Cluster -- Road Profiles (1)__ Lot Line Change Drainage Plans (1).__ Topographical Map (1).__ Site Plan (1) Grading Plan (1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet __ Page 2 Southold Town Planning Board Referral Referral Cdteda: SEQRASTATUS: 1. The project is an ( ) Unlisted Action (v,~Type I Action ( ) Type II Action 2. A ( ) Negative Declaration ( ) Positive Declaration ( ) Determination of Non-significance has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (¢/)"Yes ( )No 4. The proposed division has received approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health. ( )Yes ( )No Comments: We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (~ Yes ( )No Referral received Commission and assigned File No. 1997 by the Suffolk County Planning Sincerely, Bennett Odowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Lydia Tortora rev. 6/94 PLANNING BOARD M~EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM g. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCI-IIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 3, 1997 Terence G. Lewis, Sr. US Retirement Communities 101 Chesley Drive Media, PA 19063-1761 RE: Proposed site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lewis: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $850 from their Environmental Consultant for a review of the Long Enviormental Assessment Form (LEAF). The above mentioned sum must be paid in full before we can authorize our consultant to proceed with the review. The check should be made out to the Town of Southold. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. ~i~u~ere~ly, / / ,// Site Plan Reviewer cc: Charles J. Voorhis NIE~SON, ~Ol:ll~ & VCII:IRHIS~ I.L,C To: Valerie $copaz From: Nikki Coffey Tousley Date :October:Z, 1997 Re: Peconic Landing Lifecare Community SCTM #: 100035-25 *"**BY FAX ONLY - ONE (1) PAGE Dear Valerie, As per your request, this letter provides a proposal for services with regard to the above project. NP&:V will perform environmental planning consul'Jng services rela6ve to the above referenced projecL Services will include: review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Parts I and 3, submitted on behalf of the applicant, · preparation of a Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part field inspection of'the subject property; consultation With literature and o~ce references, and; preparation ora letter outlining the findings of the review. The fee for these services is $$50. Please let me know if you wish us to proceed '~vith this project. We have a copy of the available information which was forwarded to our office on 2eptember 1997, and can ¢onunence this prejeet upon notice. Thank you for your attention to This matter, and please ,;all if you have any questiorts. PLANNING BOARD M[EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICI-IARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 2, 1997 Garrett A Strang 1230 Travelers Street Southold, NY 11971 RE: Review of Peconic Landing at Southold Inc. elevation drawings North-side of Main Road (NYS Route 25), approximately 1,000 feet east of Sound Road SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Strang, Elevation drawings for your committee's review are in the ARC's box at the Planning Board office. Call me if you have any questions. Si cer ly ~ , / Robert G. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer PLANTING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT OELOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS K~NNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM PLAN'NING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: James Richter, Engineering Inspector Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Drainage review for Peconic Landing at Southold North side of Main Road (NYS Route 25), approximately 1,000 feet east of Sound Road SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 DATE: October 2, 1997 As discussed over the telephone on this date you had indicated that you and Ken Ibruzzo will work together on the drainage on the above project, you had also indicated that you had a set of the plans. We plan to start the Coordinated review at our meeting on October 6, 1997. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me at 765-1938. Enc. cc: Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent PLANNING BOARD M~EMBER$ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTIqOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1, Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. Requested Action: Application to amend an approved site plan for construction of 118 single family detached cottages; 132 apartment units; 24 unit assisted living center; and 32 bed skilled care center, with supporting amenities. SEQRA Classification: (x) Type I ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner (516) 765-1938 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: × This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. Other (see comments below) Comments: This life care community will be a cooperative form of ownership. Please feet free to contact this office for further information. CC: Board of Trustees Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany S~, .... Coun~ Dopc.'tm~nt cf P'..'b'.ic Works- ~rp of E.".g!,qoer. s-- ¢HNew York State Department of Transportation C-Thomas Cybulski, Greenport Public Utilities David Abatelli, Greenport Village Administrator Suffolk County Water Authority *Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 PLANNING BOARD iV[EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS I-~ENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTYIOLD October 7, 1997 Terence G. Lewis, Sr. US Retirement Communities 101 Chesley Dr. Media, PA 19063-1761 Re: Proposed site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lewis: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 6, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this Type 1 action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Chairman October 1, ]997 Memorandum to file: SUBJECT: Peconic Landing at Southold - Submission of site plan to the Suffolk County Planning Commission On this day I spoke to Jerry Newman at the Suffolk County Planning Commission regarding submission of the Peconic Landing at Southold site plan to the SCPC for review. Mr. Newman told me that the plan should not be submitted for review but it should be reviewed for local determination. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE I~.THAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Sou[hold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1997 Warren Jensen, Chief Greenport Fire Department Third SLreet, Greenport,, NY i1944 Dear Mr. Jensen: Enclosed please find one (1) survey dar,ed c~'x?+, iw~ lgr4w for SCTivI# 1000-3~-/-z~ The enclosed sit,e plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as Lo whet, her any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whekher firewells are shallow or electric. The enclosed subdivision is being referred fo you for 3c', ,' r'ccorn- mendation at. t,o whether any firewetls are needed. Ph~m~ spec fy whet`her firewells are shallow or elect,tic. Please reply by cooperation. Sincerely, 1997. Thank you for your 9ennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ere. PLANNING BOARD IVIEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR, RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 18, 1997 Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Rd. Melville, NY 11747 Re: Review of EAF for Peconic Landing SCTM~ 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form and site plan for the above mentioned project to your office for review. Please submit an estimate of what it will cost to undertake the review. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, we will send you a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman eric. 400 0~..de~ Ave... (.giG} 727.2~0~ {~,16) 727-014~ UOWARD W. YOLtI, IO, Le~ gme~m TUOMA~ e. WOLPgRT, Pmfmiene! [~ K~IJ#ETU IL ASRUZZO, L.ml gma~l~' JOUX g(~UXLIRR, Le~I gur~e~ HAND DELIVERED ATTN: Mr. Bob Kassner Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 September 17, 1997 RE: Life Care Community PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD, INC. at Greenport,T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Kassner: Enclosed are the following items: 1. application fee - applicant's check payable to Town of Southold in the amount of Twelve Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Three Dollars and Thirteen Cents (12,843.13), 2. one (1) - Application for Consideration of a Site Plan, 3. one (1) - Applicant's Affidavit, 4. twenty (20) copies - Long Environmental Assessment Form Narrative, 5. twenty (20) copies - Landscaping Narrative, 6. twenty (20) sets - Site Plan, last dated September 17, 1997 (Sheets 1 -8), and 7. six (6) sets - Architectural Drawings. iLJLi SEP I 8 1997 L Page 2 September 17, 1997 Please note that this application is for a revision of a previously approved site plan. If you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact us. TCW/dc Encl. Mr. Terry Lewis, USRC Mr. John Dussling, USRC Mr. John Capelli, ECCB Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. Mr. Jeffrey L. Seeman Very truly yours, + Encls, (Items 1-6) + 1 Set of Site Plan + Encls. (Items 1-6) + 1 Set of Site Plan + Encls. (Items 1-6) + 1 Set of Site Plan + Encls. (Items 1-6) + 1 Set of Site Plan + Encls. (Items 1-6) + 1 Set of Site Plan T.kl,~"~ (~16) 727-2~02 I:,,,"~, (~16) 727-0144 HOWARD W. YOUNG, I.,ml T~IOUAg e. WOL~RT, P,e~r~o.~l I([NNETH I:. ABRUZZO, L,,,,,I JOHN ~(~HXURR, Land Mr. Bob Kassner Town of Southold Planning Department Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 August 22, 1997 RE: PECONIC LANDING LIFE CARE COMMUNITY at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr, Kassner: Thank you for meeting with us on August 18, 1997 to discuss the environmental issues and site plan submission requirements associated with the above referenced project. We understand that, based on a follow-up telephone conversation with Mr. Ken Abruzzo of this office, the Town would not reject the application as incomplete if we submit a landscaping plan narrative at the time of initial site plan application submission. In addition, we understand that the detailed landscaping plans will be required before the Town will approve the revised site plan. We anticipate that submission of the site plan application will be made within the next few weeks. Thank you again for your assistance with this application. TCW/nac CC; Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Mr, Terry Lewis, USRC 03/27/1997 ~6:33 5t6-537-7~ 03/27/~7 1G:35 5164570422 W G THOMPSON PLAZA PAGE 01 March 25, 1997 $outh01d Town Board 9outhold Town Hall $309S Main Road P, O, BOX 11T9 $outhold, NY 1x971 Due to misinfo~matto~ e~d confusion =hat has bee~ crea~ed a result of ~he mecen~ newspaper articles concer~ing the Brec~nock Hall property, the pri~cipalS 0£ LBV p~opertias, whom ! ;ropercy, however, nothing has materialized due to lack of a4eClVa~s financing, unwillingness CO OOn~Orm to the approve~ si~e plan, the water and sanitary agreements With =he ~ill&ge ~reenport, =~e ~cenic aaieme~ts with the TOw~ Board o~ th~ Town of Southold, the DEC and DOT permits, and the covenants restrictions affecting the property. However. late last year U. S. Retiremen~ Communi~ies of Media, per,sylvania, successfully' negotiated a contract of sale for the purchase of the Brecknock gall Property. By virtue of November ?, 199~ to close title, This was naCelsary tO enable them ~o complete their marke~ re,earth and obtain the approvals from cbs St&~e o£ New York, co develop the p~perty appropriate agencies to amend the site plan, ai U ~ Retirement Communities expressed an interest in reducing the density, so 03~2771997 1~:33 ~16-537-7307 W G THOI4PSON 03/2,"/19~7 16:35 51648704~ PLAZA PAGE ~2 $outhold Town Board ATT, Supervisor Jean ~Ochran RE~ ~recknock Hall Propa~ Ma~¢h 2~, 199~ amsni:ies aimed towards senior citizens. The terms of the c~ntrac~ ara clear that the closing of title will take place with the existing site plan, c~enants and conditions, an~ other a~reamentS to remain l~ place as they are at the present time. If the purchaser desires to chan~e anythin~ concerning these existing approvals, a~reements and ps,mits, it will have to take place after the c!oain~ el title. has a bona ~ide cont~ac~ o£ Isle, and is no~ in a Do, trion to do any ne~otiatlng o~ change amy of the existin~ ap~xovala concerning this property. Therefore, it becomes di~ficult to understand ~he numerous news articles and letters concerning othe~ plans for the development of ~his property, It appears %o all Of the parties i~volved in the contract th&: the mislnfo~ation and innuendos being circulated and published are by ps,sons who may be attempting to u~dermine the existing contract o~ sale for their own agenda. ~n any event, i~ you or any member of =ha Town Board have &n~ questions, do not he~itate =o contac= ~e and I will be glad t~ mee~ with you along with the princi~ls of LBV Properties. LBV ~ro~erties~''~ U $ Retirement Communities Suffolk Times Long Island Traveler/Watchman Ewing Cole February 12, 1997 · Brott Architects Planners Federal Reserve Bank Building Independence Mall West 100 North 6th Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106-1590 215.923.2020 Fax 215.574.9163 Ms. Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Town of Southold Southhold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Ms. Scopaz: Re: Peconic Landing Project No. 97102 We appreciated your tune and information provided to us at our February 4, 1997 meeting and though we did not discuss the possibility of issuing meeting minutes we have gone ahead and prepared them. The attached minutes, we feel, reflects the matters discussed and should you have any objections to our minutes or the fact that we have gone ahead and prepared them please contact this office or John Dussling at USRC and we will amend them as needed. Very truly yours, EWING COLE CHERRY BROTT John L. Capelh, AIA Direct Dial 215.625.4626 Enclosure JLC/mp:ams bc: Mr. John Dussling -U.S. Retirement Communities Ewing Cole Cherry Brott February 11 ,. 1997 215.923.2020 Minutes Peconic Landing Project No. 97102 Present for: U.S. Retirement Conm~unitie~ Mr. John Dussling Mr. Terry Lewis (USRC) Town of Southold Mr. Robert Kassnr Ms. Valerie Scopaz (TS) Peconic Landing (PL) Mr. James Rich Ewing Cole Cherry_ Brott Mr. John Capelli Mr. Robert McConnell (ECCB) THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING held on February 4, 1997, at the Southold Municipal Building, was to discuss the site plan concept and approval process. Mr. McConnell presented a conceptual site plan with two site entrances off of Route 25. In the center of the site was the proposed community center, apartments and health center. Detached cottages would be on the east and west side of these buildings. The intent is to maintain as much of the existing vegetation as possible and develop the area around Brecknock Hall and north of the dining area by the pond as lawn. It is USRC's desire to submit and Ms. Scopz agreed the site plan application as an amendment to the existing approved site plan which would be withdrawn simultaneously at plan approval. ECCB obtained Site Application and Environmental Assessment Forms in addition Ewing Cole Cherry Brott Peconic Landing Meeting Minutes February 11, 1997 Page 2 o o At the suggestion of TS, USRC will meet preliminarily with a completed application just prior to submitting the project for formal approval. The Southold Planning Board has a workshop every Monday. Upon receipt of the formal application, the town will forward copies to a variety of agencies to determine who will have jurisdiction over the project. The Architectural Review Connnittee is an advisory group who meets on an ad- hoc basis. They usually respond one week after receipt of the project with comments to Southold Planning Board who will forward comments to the applicant. The other agencies will respond in thirty days. The Southold Plmming Board will coordinate the SEQRA review. Ms. Scopaz recommended contacting the Suffolk County Health Department directly. Her experience has been that this is a lengthy process and should be started prior to the Town of Southold review. She suggested contacting Messrs. Paul Pontero and Royal Reynolds. Per the zoning code, site plans should be submitted at 1 '-20' and elevations at the North, South, East and West facade at a suitable scale indicating color and material where possible are recommended. Ms. Scopaz suggested USRC make contact with the Northfolk Environmental Group, Brecknock Hall Society and Southold Citizens for Safe Roads. These are local groups which will be interested in the project. Mr. Dussling requested clarification on the "Parks and Playground" fee. Ms. Scopaz advised the group that this fee does not apply to this project because the site is not being sub-divided. Ewing Cole Cherry Brott Peconic Landing Meeting Minutes February 11, 1997 Page 3 10. Next Meetine The next meeting will be scheduled by USRC/ECCB when the project team is ready for a preliminary review. EWI~G COLE CHERRY B, ROTT ~ L. Capelli!~ Direct Dial 215.625.4626 JLC/ams/mp cc: All present We believe that these minutes accurately reflect what transpired at this meeting. However, we will appreciate comments involving a differeut understanding of what occurred. Unless we are notified in writing to the contrary within ten days after receipt, we will assume that you concur in the accuracy of this transcription. BARTON,~Associates RAHENKAMP PLANNING GROUP PECONIC LANDING LANDSCAPE CONCEPT Peconic Landing, a proposed continuing care retirement community, is situated on the site occupied by Brecknock Hall. The site exhibits an extraordinary and diverse natural environment highlighted by a half of mile of cliffs overlooking the Long Island Sound. Another feature of the site is the substantial mature wooded area located in its northern and eastern portions along the entire edge of the neighboring golf course. This wooded area is comprised of a mixture of Oaks and American Beech. This Oak-Beech association is somewhat unique for this type of maritime location because of the soil type found in this region of Long Island. Many of the disturbed areas have begun to vegetate themselves and over time they too will eventually mature into wood[and areas. Two ponds and wetland areas are found on the site, one adjacent to the shoreline of the Sound and the second more internal within the site. A third large depression occurs in the location where significant sand was removed from the site. While currently an unsightly area, it can be reclaimed as an attractive focal point of the proposed retirement community. The last significant feature is Brecknock Hall and the associated ornamental landscaping that surrounds the original house. The focus of the landscape treatment for the site is to preserve its significant environmental and vegetative features. In addition, enhancements to these features will be proposed to further increase the aesthetic character of the site. Two entrances are proposed to the retirement community, each of which will be equally important. One entrance is designed to enter the site near the original main driveway location for Brecknock Hall. The location of this entrance is designed to preserve the hedge along the Main Koad as well as the original gateway. The road has been aligned to preserve the mature trees ami maintain the original character of the landscape. The second entrance to the east will be designed in a similar manner consistent with the other entrance. The location of this entrance is designed to preserve mature woodlands to the greatest extent possible. The landscape design for this entrance will utilize informal plantings to enhance the preserved v~getation. Native flowering trees and shrubs such as mountain laurel and dogwoods, which are found throughout the Oak-Beech forest, will be planted along the edges of the preserved woods as an understory and will add seasonal color and interest. A manicured lawn area will be maintained immediately adjacent to the roadway where open areas occur. Wildflower meadows will be planted beyond the lawn areas to add color but also to give the site a naturalistic appearance. This theme of preservation and enhancement of the natural landscape will continue throughout the site. Roads and building locations have been sited to maximize the preservation of the wooded area and as well the succession and shrub areas. Roads are designed with narrow cart ways and no curbs to integrate them within the natural topography and minimize the extent of earthwork required, Plantings along the roadways will occur in naturalistic groupings to enhance the existing vegetation. The landscaping around the cottages will be designed to enhance the preserved natural woodlands and other vegetation. Native plant material will be selected for color and other aesthetic interest. The landscaping around the Community Center, Health Center and apartments will also be handled in a consistent naturalistic manner with the cottages and the overall landscape appearance. Entrances and courtyards will be selected for a more refined and formal treatment. These special areas will act as focal elements and gathering places within the community. A loop road surrounding one of the existing ponds and wetlands creates the main entrance to the Community Center. The road and the associated grading required minimize impacts on the pond and wetlands. In order to enhance the view of the ponds and make it visually part of the entrance loop, selective clearing of the under story is proposed. A second pond is proposed that will enhance the view of the existing pond in the center of the loop road as well as be a part of an eeo-basin system. This system will extend through the collector road via a stream that connects the two ponds. The entire eeo-basin system will be planted with natural grasses and wetland species. Not only will it function as an aesthetic focal point of the community, but it will also help clean the storm water of sediment and various road pollutants. In summary, the goal of Peconic Landing is to preserve and enhance the natural environment through careful integration of the community with the topography and the natural vegetation. Through the use of native plant material, the preserved vegetation will be enhanced to create an aesthetic natural appearance for the entire community. LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Approved Proiect Type: Site Plans Status: Final Approval SCTM #: 1000- 35-1-25 Proiect Name: Peconic Landing Address: Main Road Hamlet: Greenport Applicant Name: US Retiremnet Communities Owner Name: US Retiremnt Communities Zone 1: HO Approval Date: 12/5/2000 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 4/14/2000 Zone 2: LB Zone 3: Location: Greenport SC Filing Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCAN Date: SCANNED JAN 4 3X)6 Records Management RESPONSE TO COMMENTS JUNE 1998 Prepared by: Coastal Environmental Corporation . eo ~ox 6o~ Southold Town P' ~ninn I I Lifecare Community Southold, New York I Proposed Action: I Location: I i Applicant: I Agency: I I Preparers: I Date: LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets Revision of Approved Site Plan: Peconic Landing Lifecare Community at Southold North-side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) approximately 1,100 feet east of Sound Road Suffolk Tax Map # 1000-35-1-25 Greenport, Town of Southold, NY U.S. Retirement Communities of Behalf of Peconic Landing 101 Chelsey Drive Media, PA 19063 Planning Board - Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Tel. (516) 765-1938 Fax (516) 765 3136 Environmental Consultant: Coastal Environmental Corporation PO Box 602 Brightwaters, NY 11718 Engineers/Surveyors: Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, NY 11901 Traffic Consultant: Ensign Engineering, PC 3237 Tierney Place, Bronx, NY 10465 Cultural Resources: Greenhouse Consultants 6110 River Chase Circle, Atlanta, GA 30328 June 1998 Coastal Environmental Corporo#on I I Peconic Landing at $outhold Lifecare Community Southold, New York LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets I i Section · Introduction I · Slope Analysis Table of Contents Hydrology & Potential Wetland Impact Assessment I · Stormwater Management · Freshwater Wetlands I · Vegetation Map 4 6 8 10 I · Wildlife & Habitats · Traffic 10 10 Cultural Resources 10 Attachments Slope Analysis Map Hydrology Assessment Map Vegetation Map Coastal Environmental Corporation I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing a~ $ou~old Lifecare Community $out~old, Ne~ York LEAF Comments Wildlife & Habitat Literature Search Peconic Landing Cut & Fill Calculations Ensign Engineering, P.C. - Traffic Statement References LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets Number 1 2 3 4 Coastal Environmental Corporation I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconi¢ Landing at $outhold l. lf ecare Community $outhold, New York LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets Introduction In accordance with requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Regulations (6 NYCRR Part 617) the applicant has filed a Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) with the Town of Southold. The purpose of this LEAF Narrative: Response to Comments is to provide additional information to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, acting as Lead Agency, for the Determination of Significance. The LEAF Narrative: Response to Comments describes the concerns presented by the public review of the LEAF dated September, 1997. Appropriate measures to avoid, minimize and/or mitigate potential adverse environmental conditions and revisions to the site plan are described. The comments received are presented in Appendix 1. The focus of the response is placed on the following issues and request for additional information: · A slope analysis of topographic features. · A hydrological analysis and assessment of freshwater wetland effects. · Planting designs for stormwater detention systems. · Discussion of mitigation measures for wetland impacts. · Exploration of options for wetland restoration and design. Exploration of alternative stormwater control systems which would not involve extensive grading in and adjacent the existing wetland. · Documentation from the Natural Heritage Program on rare species. · Discussion of archaeological and historic resources on site. · Delineation of water supply utility easement. · Preparation of a vegetation/habitat map. · Additional traffic analyses. Coastal Environmental Corporation l I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic l,anding at $outhold 1.ifecare Community Southold, New York LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets Slope Analysis A slope analysis of the existing conditions map was prepared and the general site plan overlain on this map to indicate slope ranges and corresponding development. This slope analysis indicates the following: Site Coverage 120.5530 acres (83.28%) 9.1696 acres (6.33%) 15.0482 acres (10.39%) Slope Range 0.00% - 10.00% 10.00% - 15.00% 1500% and greater Eight units and a section of the community center are sited within areas that have existing slopes that are 15% or greater. The cut and fill analysis prepared for the project indicates once final site grading is complete there will be a nominal amount of excess material; resulting in a balanced site. Approximately 128,500 cubic yards will be cut and 128,200 cubic yards will be filled. Recommendations for erosion control and stabilization of soils during and after construction within steeply sloped areas may include the following Preventive Practice - developed to reduce adverse effects of rainfall and water runoff that may exacerbate erosion: · Reduce the area and duration of exposed soils. · Cover soils with mulch or vegetation. · Control and divert runoff away from exposed or steeply sloped areas. · Provide sediment traps (such as silt barrier fencing) around the toe of the slope and around stockpiled soils. · Excavate temporary, shallow detention basins adjacent to construction roads and Iow elevation areas. For areas of moderate slopes the desired approach for stabilization includes planting vegetation as indicated on the Landscaping Plan. In more steeply sloped regions additional measures may be warranted, pending construction conditions. If grading is interrupted for extended time periods the areas can be stabilized with fast growing annuals, Mulch can be used as an alternative to planting of annuals. Hydroseeding of the slopes with a vegetative cover will provide temporary stabilization until final Coastal Environmental Corporation 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic £anding at $outhold Lifecare Community Soutltold, New York LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets plantings are prepared. Final grading, permanent vegetation and retaining walls where indicated on the site plan will provide long range slope stabilization. Coastal Environmental Corporation I ! Peconic Landing a~ $outhoM Lifecare Community $outhold, New York LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets I Hydrology & Potential Wetland Impact Assessment An assessment compared existing drainage patterns and post development hydrology to determine what influences the proposed action would have on existing freshwater wetlands. The LEAF Narrative stated that the two wetland systems ware principally supported by groundwater. The kettle hole formation of the wetlands and recorded depth to groundwater was used to support this determination. A field verification of the wetland delineation was conducted by the NYSDEC on April 7, 1998; the NYSDEC agreed with the delineation and the hydrologic determination that each wetland was supported primarily by groundwater. I I I I I The major topographic land features that could divert runoff to wetlands include three (3) primary drainage sub-basins. These drainage areas (labeled as A, B & C on the Hydrology Assessment Map) ware evaluated to determine what significance surface runoff from storm events can have on the existing wetland systems. A second analysis was conducted to determine what post development effects the alteration of the drainage pattems and natural hydrology would have on the existing wetlands. I I The Hydrology Assessment Map indicates the outline of the drainage areas and, using standard hydrologic calculations involving rainfall intensity, surface area, slopes, soil types and vegetative cover, the quantity of stormwater runoff for each sub-basin was calculated. For existing conditions the analysis determined that relatively Iow quantities of surface runoff enter the wetland systems. I Foreach oneinch ofrainfallthefollowing was calculated forexisting conditions: i Sub-basin Area (SF) Runoff Entering Wetland System (CF) A 565,000 14,400 I B 614,300 10,000 I C* 237,600 5,000 * Sub-basin C does not include a wetland but does include a significant Iow point which is classified as upland. Coastal Environrnental Corporation 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at Southold £ifecare Community $oathold, New York LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets For each one inch of rainfall the following was calculated for post development conditions: Sub-basin Area (SF) Runoff Entering Wetland System (CF) A-I 463,700 13,800 B-1 177,900 7,560 Sub-basin C is eliminated in the post development scenario. The evaluation determined that the ability of the existing site's hydrologic conditions would not provide the quantity of stormwater runoff to sustain wetland systems with the characteristics of those found on site. The determination is supported by the analysis of sub-basin C; where the existing drainage patterns permit flow to the Iow point found in the natural landscape but where no wetland indicators are present. Subsequently the two wetland systems are principally supported by their interception with groundwater; surface runoff has less supporting hydrology for these systems. The post development stormwater control system is designed to recharge the collected stormwater to groundwater. The recharge is directed upgradient of the groundwater directional flow (which is generally northerly, towards the Long Island Sound). The wetland systems should not be significantly effected by the Peconic Landing project because the primary source of water that supports these systems will still receive recharge from the stormwater generated at the site. Coastal Environmental Corporation I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at $outhold £if ecare Community $outhold, New York LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets Stormwater Management The revised stormwater control system has addressed concems regarding discharge of stormwater overflow to the existing freshwater wetlands. The stromwater collection system includes a series of catch basins and storm sewer pipes used to direct stormwater to a series of five detention ponds, each connected by open channels. The channels include check dams which are located to control water elevations and discharge velocities. The constructed ponds and channel system is designed to offer visual benefit, provide additional aquatic habitat and to meet Town of Southold stormwater control requirements. The collected stormwater will be conveyed through four ponds lined with Iow permeability soils. The ponds and channel areas are designed to support wetland vegetation. The detention ponds are used to detain the stormwater and allow sediments to settle from the water column. The first four pond bottoms will be backfilled and compacted with a mix of clay or top soils developed to retard rapid recharge. The fifth pond is designed to an elevation that intercepts groundwater. It is not lined and is the end point for recharge. The proposed wetland vegetation will slow the velocity of the stormwater flow and filter out sediments. The vegetation will also reduce pollutants associated with stormwater run-off (nitrogen, phosphorus, oil and grease). The stormwater control system flows by gravity; no mechanical equipment is required. The stormwater will infiltrate to groundwater at the fifth pond and provides recharge to the Upper Aquifer. The constructed area of wetlands created for the stormwater control system will increase the total on-site areas of aquatic and freshwater wetland habitats. The stormwater management system is consistent with NYSDEC guidelines for stormwater management and erosion control practices (Reducing the Impacts of Stormwater Runoff from New Development, NYSDEC, 1993) and recommendations of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments for the design of stormwater wetland systems in the mid*Atlantic region. The stormwater control system also provides open space, existing habitat protection and enhancement of visual aspects associated with the project. The reduction of stormwater discharge to Long Island Sound is consistent with the goals of the Long Island Sound Study. 6 Coastal Environmental Corporation I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at Southold Lifecare Community Southold, New York LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets The pollutant removal capability of stormwater wetlands has been estimated by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments · Projected Long Term Remova/ Rates For Mid-At/antic Stormwater Wet/ands Pollutant Removal Rate Total Suspended Solids 75% Total Phosphorus 45% Total Nitrogen 25% Organic Carbon (BOD & COD) 15% Lead 75% Zinc 50% Bacteda 2 log reduction It is reasonable to predict that the Peconic Landing at Southold stormwater management system pollutant removal capability will be within this range. The Landscape Planting Plan provides additional planting details for the stormwater control system. 7 Coastal Environmental Corporation I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at $outhold Lifecare Community Southold, New York LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets Freshwater Wetlands An Article 24 Freshwater Wetland Permit Application No. 1-4738-01805/00001 was filed with the NYSDEC. A letter of non-jurisdiction has been received from the Town of Southold. Each of these agencies had commented on the potential impacts to wetlands and requested additional information on wetland restoration plans and proposed constructed wetland systems. Meetings were held with the NYSDEC representatives to discuss alternatives to the stormwater control system which originally proposed stormwater overflow to the south wetland; and to discuss wetland enhancements to eliminate Phragmites from the north wetland. The applicant has revised the drainage plans to eliminate the need for an overflow outlet with discharge to the south wetland and construct stormwater controls beyond 100 feet from the wetland boundary. The NYSDEC has suggested enhancement of the south wetland for the purposes of nature walks and study. A system of wood chips or similar natural matter walking trails requiring a minimum of clearing can be installed around the wetland. A prudent tree limb pruning program may be permitted providing that the penetration of sunlight does not reach the forest floor. The north wetland will not be excavated to a depth below the elevation of groundwater to provide for additional open water(as originally proposed). Although not part of this application, the NYSDEC has discussed with the applicant the use of glyphosate (tradename Roundup) and hand cutting as the recommended method to control the Phragmites. If the applicant chooses to restore the wetland at some future date, a detailed plan which describes that no excavation will take place; cuttings will be removed and disposed at an approved upland site; time of year, frequency of cutting and glyphosate applications must be provided to the NYSDEC. The typical method of application of the herbicide is wicking; equipment and personnel qualifications will be submitted. A monitoring program that documents the results of the eradication program and field studies on wetland species that survive shall be provided to the NYSDEC. The eradication method is designed to reduce the near monoculture of Phragmites and permit the naturally occurring (albeit currently stressed) existing freshwater wetland plants to grow. The NYSDEC has indicated that the following may be permitted: existing roadways may be converted to grass walking paths (limited to the existing roads); erosion control Coastal Environmental Corporation I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at $outhold Lifecare Communily $outhold, New York LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets structures must be employed in areas within 100 feet of tidal and freshwater wetlands and remain in place until suitable vegetative cover has established, All other activities in excess of 100 feet from the wetlands will not require a wetland permit. The Town of Southold Board of Trustees held a public hearing on the Peconic Landing wetland application. The comments provided are part of the Town's public record, but in summary involved questions about the excavation of the north wetland. The revised plan address these issues. Representatives of the Town ware present during field assessments conducted among the applicant's professional consultants and the NYSDEC. Coastal Environmental Corporation I I Peconic Landing at $outhold Lif ecare Community Southold, New York LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets I Vegetation Map An Existing Vegetation Map was prepared to describe the location of the following vegetative cover: I I I I Maritime Oak Beech Forest Successional Southern Hardwoods Successional Shrubland Successional Field/Shrub Open Water Freshwater Wetland Mined Land Cultivars Bluff Vegetation 1 The map was prepared from interpretation of aerial photographs and on site vegetation surveys. I I I I Wildlife & Habitats The documentation regarding literature searches for determination of significant species and habitats is provided in Appendix 2. Traffic Traffic comments have been addressed in a separate report, Traffic Assessment Study for Peconic Landing, February 17, 1998 prepared by Ensign Engineering, P.C. The assessment concluded that the proposed development of Peconic Landing Lifecare Community will have no significant impact on the immediate surrounding roadway network. The primary component of the traffic study is included in Appendix 4. The entire study and its appendices are on file with the Town of Southold. I I I Cultural Resources A Stage lA archaeological sensitivity study assessment of the Peconic Landing project site is being prepared by Greenhouse Consultants, Inc., a qualified firm specializing in cultural resource assessments. The archaeological studies will include research and a summary of findings that will determine if field testing is required. The study will be submitted as an addendum to the LEAF Narrative: Response to Comments. 10 Coastal Environmental Corporation I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix 1 LEAF Comments NP&V Letter - November 14, 1997 NYSDEC Letter - November 26, 1997 NYSDEC Letter - April 24, 1998 I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, I. LC CHARLES J VOORHIS. CEP, A CP - ARTHUR J. KOERBER, ~F- · VINCENT G DONNELLY, · VICTOR ~ERT, hE. - JOSEPH R+ EPIFANIA. hE- ROBERT G. NELSON, JR. · CHRISTOPHER W ROBINSON. Mr. Bennett Odowski, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re~ November 14, 1997 Renew of Long E~, Pros 1 ~d 3 Peco~c L~ding at Sou~old SC~ No. 1000-035-1-25 N&P No. 97291 Dear Mr. Orlowskl: As per your request, we have completed a review of the Long EAF, Parts 1 and 3 for the above referenced project, which were submitted together. The parcel has been field inspected by NP&V, and the LEAF, Part 1 has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of the revised Part 1 and a Part II LEAF checklist prepared by our office are attached. A narrative report of our findings is presented below. The parcel has been inspected, and enviromental references concerning the ske and area have been consulted. The site consists of 144.77 acres of land in the hamlet of Greenport, in the Town of Southold. The proposed project, which is described as a residential lifecare community, would offer a variety of lix4ng options for senior citizens ranging from independent living to skilled nursing care. The site plan shows a total of 118 detached single family cottages, 132 attached apartments, 24 assisted living units and a 32 bed. Skilled Care Center. A previous application for the project site involved a 350 unit condominium development known as the Breakers at Lands End, which is referenced for comparison throughout the Long EAF, Part 3. The Peconic Landing property is located to the east of the Village of Greenport, on the north side of New York State Route 25 (Main Road). The site is immediately west of the Islands End Golf Course, and extends from Route 25 to Long Island Sound. A swale runs through the center of the site from south to north, although the topography to the east and west of the swale is relatively flat. There are two groundwater fed kettle ponds within the swale, with associated wetland habitats. The northern wetland is located at a low point between the bluffs, just above the beach. The bluffs rise to a maximum height of fifty feet, with only a slight dune at the base of Page 1 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE. NY .~7,aT.e.~ee I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Long E.a~F, Part :3 Review the swale near the wetland. Most of the site is characterized by early successional species and was historically used for agricultural crops and pasturing of livestock. The northern pond and adjacent dune have been disturbed by human activity, and the wetland vegetation is dominated by the opportunistic common reed (Phragmites australis). The southern pond is relatively pristine, with a wide wooded buffer. Areas of woodland are also found along the eastern border of the site. There are.. several historic and recent buildings on the southern portion of the site, including Brecknock Hall, a large stone mansion built in the early 19th century by the Floyd family. In addition, the Village of Greenport maintains a water pump station in the central portion of the site, which will remain under the proposed plan. Sand mining has also occurred on the property, and there is a large exposed pit to the west of the pump station. Dirt trails and pathways are found throughout the parcel, and vehicle access to the beach is possible from a trail along the eastern bluff. A poured concrete foundation is present to the southeast of the northern wetland. This foundation appears to be fairly recent and was likely intended for a large home which was never completed. A large pile of excavated fill remains near the foundation. The project site contains a variety of important environmental resources, including unusual geologic features, surface water features, wetlands, a variety of ecolog/cal habitats, and historic resources. This review will discuss the proposed project and its potential impact on these resources. Geologic Resources The project site contains a variety of important local geologic features, including high bluffs along Long Island Sound and a swale with kettle ponds running through the center of the property. In addition, there are limited areas of steep slopes elsewhere on site, although the steepest slopes are associated with the wetland borders. The Long EAF Part 3 does not provide a slope analysis for the property, however it is clear that some construction in areas of steep slopes over '15 percent will occur. This construction will include excavation and expansion of both wetland areas, as well as construction of roads and buildings. There is a high potential for erosion impacts as a result of the proposed project, particularly near the southern, more pristine wetland. It should be possible to mitigate these potential geologic impacts of the project, however, appropriate documentation has not been provided. A slope analysis and erosion control plan should be provided by the applicant so that the impacts can be assessed. The site plan does include the proposed grading for the project, but erosion control measures are only discussed in brief within the Long EAF, Part 3. It appears as though slopes as great as 25 percent will be created adjacent to the newly restored wetland areas. A slope analysis would also be useful in determining if relocation of building or other site amenities might be useful in minimizing erosion impacts. For instance, the proposed community center and apartment building will Page 2 I ! I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I Peconic Landing ~ Greenport LOng EA.]F, Part 3 Review be located in the swale between the two wetlands, which contains steep slopes as well as slight depressions. Location of these buildings as proposed may result in erosion and significant changes to the drainage patterns within the swale, and alternative locations and/or mitigation might be considered which minimizes disturbance between the wetlands. One of the benefits of the proposed project is that the existing sand mine on site will be the location of a newly created stormwater wetland retention basin. This will minimize the need for off site disposal of sediments from the property, and is a creative use of the excavated pit. The proposed plan also provides adequate protection of the bluff to minimize erosion. A 100 foot setback would be maintained, with the exception of the proposed pedestrian footpath. The path follows the existing earth road where possible, and would require only minimal clearing of vegetation. In addition, the proposed gazebos will be located in areas which are already cleared, allowing residents to overlook the Sound, while minimizing disturbance to the bluff The proposed plan does not show a beach access point, although the proposed footpath descends to the dune on the north side of the northernmost pond. To the east, the footpath would follow the existing earth road, and would not require additional erosion control measures. The slope is relatively gentle in this area, and would allow handicapped accessibility. To the west, grading and erosion control for the proposed path would be necessary, and more detailed plans should be required as part of the ongoing review process to insure that erosion in this area is minimal. The dune at the base of the swale is currently unvegetated, and restoration of beach grass in this area and installation of a boardwalk would help limit future storm impacts. Water Resources The project site is located within Groundwater Zone IV, and there is an existing water supply pump station on site. Groundwater resources are only briefly discussed in the Part 3, Long EAF as impacts are expected to be minimal. The proposed retirement community will be served by the both the local water authority and by the Greenport sewer district, and thus sanitary flow from the site will not impact local groundwater quality. The permanent utility easement shown on the boundary survey should be shown on the site plan to ensure this easement is maintained. The Town may wish to consider asking the applicant to develop best management strategies for limiting use of fertilizer and pesticides on site, which would further reduce the groundwater impacts of the proposed project. Of greater concern are the potential impacts to surface water resources on site, which include two freshwater pcmds within the swale which drains towards Long Island Sound. The proposed project will involve extensive engineering-of a positive overflow, stormwater detention basin with a biofiltration system. The biofiltration system is intended to minimize the pollution load in both groundwater and surface water. Stormwater runoff would be directed into a micropool to allow settling of sediments, and would then flow along a meandering channel vegetated with wetland species. The Page I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Long EAF, Par~ 3 Review vegetation is intended to slow the velocity of stormwater flow to filter sediments and reduce pollutant loads. Overflow from extreme storm events would be directed to the existing southern wetland. This wetland would be expanded to include a plunge pool at the stormwater outlet and a channel flowing into the existing pond. While this system appears to be well designed, the impacts on the relatively pristine existing wetland have not been analyzed. Drainage calculations were not included in information received by this office, so a determination of capacity can not be made. This information should be submitted to the Town Board for drainage review and would be useful in a revised Long EAF, Part 3. Additional information on the impact of the proposed project on this wetland is needed. An alternative might explore other options for the discharge of overflow stormwater. In addition, the hydrology of the existing wetlands, including an analysis of the contributing drainage should be included to ensure that neither wetland is adversely affected by the diversion of stormwater which would otherwise 'enter the existing basins. Ecological Resources The existing vegetation of the projec$ site is predominantly successional old field and successional shrubland. There are limited areas of oak-beech and early successional woodland, as well as wetland, beach, and maritime shrubland habitats. As currently proposed, the project would preserve almost all of the wetland and maritime shrubland vegetation, as well as portions of the existing woodlands. The applicant has not provided a habitat map within the Long EAF. It is recommended that the'applicant provide such a map in a revised Lung EAF. This would help with the identification of areas of woodland on site which might be preserved as clusters within the proposed landscaping areas. There is an extensive area of oak-beech woodland along the eastern border of the property, as well as buffers of woodland around the perimeter of the wetlands. Although this is not virgin forest, there are trees of significant size and a well established understory of mountain laurel. These areas should be retained where possible and incorporated into the landscaping design for the site. In general, the impacts to the vegetation along the top of the bluff and along the beach should be rninimalunder the proposed plan. The vegetation alongthe top ofthe bluffs has been described as maritime shrubland, and will be almost entirely protected within the proposed 100 foot setback from the bluff. This area would be maintained as natural vegetation, with the exception of a narrow pedestrian path for use by community residents. Three gazebos are proposed along the top of the bluffs, but would be located in areas which are already cleared. The dune to the north of the northern wetland is a partially cleared. The Town may wish to require revegetation of this area, which might also include a boardwalk or similar structure for beach access, as access is not provided under the current plan. Page 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing ~ Greenpor~ Long EAF, Pat't 3 Review The proposed plan would involve excavation to expand both of the existing wetlands. This expansion and the creation of the proposed stormwater wetland will substantially increase the area of wetlands on site, however, the applicant must ensure that impacts to the native wetland habitats are not significant. The northern existing wetland is already somewhat disturbed, and consists of a pond with a fringe of common reed to the north and a large area dominated by common reed to the south. Under the proposed plan, this southern area would be excavated to create a second pond, reducing the total area of common reed and creating an additional open water environment. The Long EAF, Part 3 does not discuss the applicants rationale for this proposal, and it would not be advisable if the area were not already disturbed. There is an opportunity to improve the ecological value of the wetland, and the Town may wish to require that the applicant consider removal of all of the common reed, with replanting to create a more diverse wetland. While it is not expected that the removal of the common reed and creation of a pond would have an adverse impact if'properly and carefully constructed, the benefits of such a pond creation could be expanded through the development of a better wetland restoration plan. The southern existing wetland is more pristine, and consists of a glacial kettle with red maple and understory shrubs growing out of a shallow pond. Under the proposed plan, the southern border of the wetland would be expanded for the creation of a plunge pool and channel, which would carry overflow from the newly created stormwater basin to the south to the existing pond. The border of the wetland is relatively abrupt due to the presence of steep slopes, and thus the proposed expansion would not require extensive removal of existing wetland species, however, the impact of the proposed plan on the existing wetland should be studied in greater detail, particularly in view of the proposed grading and slopes. The submitted Long EAF only briefly discusses the hydrology of the wetland and impact to wetland species. The Town may wish to ask the applicant to consider other options for the handling of stormwater overflow from the proposed detention basin. Although it is expected that the biofilter of the stormwater basin will reduce the level of pollutant in runoff, the changes in hydrology, grading, and removal of wetland species is expected to have a significant adverse impact on this wetland based on the information currently available. Most of the remainder of the site consists of early successional shrubland and old field habitats, which are unlikely to contain significant numbers of rare species. These habitats are common in the vicinity of the site, and thus the proposed development of the upland portion of the site is not expected to result in a significant impacts. In addition, the existing successional habitats and landscaping around Brecknock Hall would be retained and would continue to provide visual screening of the interior of the site. It is not known whether the site contains rare or endangered species. The applicant contacted the New York State Natural Heritage Program, but the sheet listing endangered species found in the vicinity is missing from the Appendix of the Long EAF. A single sentence referencing these species is also missing on page 18 of the text of the Page I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing ~ Greenport Long EAF, Part 3 Review Long EAF. The Long EAF does state that Lamont (1997) did not find any of these species on site, but there is no reference for this citation. Given the high level of disturbance on site, it is unlikely that these species are present, however, the applicant should provide this information in a revised Long EAF. Traffic A separate review of the traffic sections of the Long EAF has been prepared by a traffic engineer at Nelson & Pope, LLP, and is attached. The traffic study should be revised in response to these comments. The most substantial comment is that the applicant's engineer did not project the fiature "No Build" conditions, which should be utilized as a baseline rather than existing conditions. Preliminary results do suggest that traffic impacts will be minimal, and that a signal would not be required; however, substantiation should be provided based on sound traffic engineering principles. Land Use and Zoning The project site is located to the east of Greenport Village along the New York State Route 25 corridor, which contains a mix ofresidentiai and retail uses. Immediately east of the site is the Islands End Golf Course, and residential properties are present to the west and along the southern border. The site is zoned for Hamlet Density residential development (I-K)) with a small area of Limited Business (LB) zoning along Route 25. The maximum development allowed on the HD portion of the site would be approximately 350 condominium units, and the proposed development is an allowed use within the zoning district. Brecknock Hall is located on the LB portion of the site, which could be developed with approximately 108,000 square feet of retail space. The Long EAF suggests that this area would not be developed, as there are tentative plans for use of Brecknock Hall as a performing arts center, stating that this would be a benefit of the proposed plan as compared with the Breakers proposal. While this would be desirable, there is no assurance under the proposed plan that this portion of the parcel would not be developed for business use in the future. As development fights would remain on the LB portion of the property, the Town may wish to explore placement of covenants on the property which would ensure the preservation of Brecknock Hall and minimize the potential for incongruent uses on the remaining LB portion of the site. The proposed retirement community will be in keeping with the development in the surrounding area and is a contemplated used within the zoning district. Thus, as long as development of the LB portion of the site is controlled, the land use impacts of the proposed project are expected to be minimal. Page 6 I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I Peconic Landing ~ Greenpor~ Long EAF, Part '~ Review Visual Resources The project site is most visible from NYS Route 25, although a limited number of viewers observe the site from the adjacent golf course and residences. The proposed site plan includes preservation of a wooded buffer along the eastern border of the site, as well as retention of the landscaped and overgrown areas along Route 25. This area includes several large trees and ornamental species surrounding Brecknock Hall. Shrubby vegetation could also be retained along the western border, and would eventually grow to screen use of the site. Thus, the visual impacts of the proposed project will be minimal and wiI[ not intrude into the rural character of the area. Screening vegetation may be necessary along the border of the residence to the east of Brecknock Hall and the caretaker cottage, which is not part of the project site. Although landscaping is not discussed in detail in the Long EAF Part 3, it would be expected that the proposed retirement community will be attractively designed with well developed landscaping. The Town may wish to require a landscaping plan at a later stage of the review process, and such a plan might include use of native species which would reduce the need for fertilization and use of pesticides on site. Native maritime species are readily available, and could easily be included in the landscaping design for the proposed retirement community. Cultural Resources The proposed project site includes a 19th Century mansion, as well as several out buildings, some of which may have historical significance. Brecknock Hall will be retained under the proposed project, but the other buildings would be removed. In addition, the presence of surface water on site suggests that the site could contain prehistoric artifacts in addition to these historic resources. The value of these resources should be investigated more fully. In addition, the site is in an area of general archaeological significance. The combination of these factors indicates that a Stage lA and lB archaeology survey would be appropriate as part of a revised Long EAF. Economics The proposed project should result in significant tax generation to local districts. There will be no school children generated as under the previous condominium proposal, and the community will have on site security and health services which should reduce the need for these services within the local community. The Long EAF suggests that up to 80% of residents may come from outside the local area, although the project will accommodate local residents. Thus, the proposed project is desirable, particularly if the environmental impacts of the proposed project can be substantially mitigated. Page 7 ! I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing (~ Greenpor~ Lon~ EA~, Part3 Review In conclusion, the proposed Peconic Landing Retirement Community appears to be well designed, and includes substantial mitigation, particularly of surface water and groundwater impacts; however, there is a need for an additional environmental study of the site. In order to make an informed decision on the proposed plan, the Town may wish to ask for an expanded Long EAF which would include the following: · A topographic survey with slope analysis, ·-. A hydrological study of the rainage basins on site, with discussion of the potential impacts to the existing wetlands, · Further information on the planting design of the proposed stormwater detention basin, · Further discussion of mitigation of impacts to wetland vegetation, · Exploration of options for wetland restoration and design, · Exploration of alternative stormwater systems which would not involve extensive grading in and adjacent to and within the existing wetland, · Documentation from the Natural Heritage Program on rare species, · Further discussion of the archaeological and historic resources on site, · Delineation of water supply utility easement, and * Preparation ora vegetation/habitat map. A reference list of sources of environmental documentation should also be required, as none is provided in the submitted Long EAF. We believe that additional information in the form of a revised Part 3, Long EAF is necessary to demonstrate that a "hard look" has been taken with regard to the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. This information will be used as a basis for a determination of significance. If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to call. enc: Long EAF Parts I & II Very truly yours, #PSV Page 8 I I I I I I I I I I t I I I- I I I I 1. L~ ?~ge 19 Pecomc Land/rig ~ Southold Traffic Impa~t ,~uaJys/s R~vi~v N&P #9T29 ! November 17, 1997 · ?rowde .:he comparison to mc counts obtmned fi'om the mumapa~ ~genc~cs. T.vpie~lly. t~-~c co.nr~ ~r use b a T,'-~:ic impact Study :~re ~t p~o~ ~ t F~y, ~ k ~ g~ly not r~r~ive of ~ av~ or ~i~ ~y. h ~is ~ how~, ~e LEAF Pa~e 20 · Thc trz~c analysis ~hould include a trip generanon c~mpansen to the previous study prepar~ for ~e Br~k¢:'s sppiics~cn to substamia~ the/r claim. Ensi~u. Enmneering. PC, August !2. !997 lett~ - Pa~e I Based on pag~ ! of the LE.~. ~Ze proposed br~k~ov,-n of the projec~ is to be ~ follows: CoLlage 118 Units 132 Units 250 Units Assist~ Living C.,~ttcr Units Sldll~ Ca.~ 24 Units 32 Units 56 Units 'Fao repot: properly ~ref~ences :he ITE Trip Generation Manual, but m]pro~crt'y utes a~-m pmsen~ :hereto. The report ufip generation should be revise, ~:o r:.q~z: ~'~, :c:~tlo:~ir, g breakdown: 250 Umts 56 Un/ts Kenre:neat Communi .fy, Land Usc 250 Congregate Care Facqlty, Land Use 252 ~ian Eamn-e~'nna. PC..a,u~aat !2. 1997 let.er - Page 2 a. The !at~t r¢.4~ion of the Highway Capac/ty Sot~.~m.n: should be u~ii':,;i ::urmg the prepamnoa of Traffic Im..pa~ .a. naI~c~. A "No Build" traffic voium,.c comJ/t/on should be prep. axed using apprc, :' f,:c:,.'~-d'~ ram fa~',~rs and ,:rher pior. a~ prqects..,'"Tris condition would address .~atur: ,"'=' - ~* '; m the vicini~' of thc iia 'a~thout ~e p .ropo~. ! ! ! ! I I I I I I I ! ! I I !' ! I Re: Peconic Landing ~ Southold Novembcr 17, 1997 Page 2 d. L~ci oF Ser,~c~ C is ~cce~ble for !ei~ ~m movements ~om ~e minor street ~.~pr~ch of -~ a~ u. nsigna~ int~$~c~cn. Route 25 is under ~hcjurisdic~ion o£~¢ ~'wlrSDOT. During ~heir ,'~wiew o~th~ project, the NYSDOT will provide input. I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Phone (516) 444-0365 Fax # (516) 444-0360 November 26, 1997 Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Application I.D. No. 1-4738-01805/00001 Peconic Landing at Southold Lifecare Community Daar Mr. Wolpert: The Department of Environmental Conservation has received your application for the proposed development and we have the following comments/concerns: The proposed plan does not indicate who delineated the wetland boundary and the date. Therefore, this Department will conduct a field inspection and subsequent to that inspection, you may be required to modify the plans showing the correct wetland delineation. Please complete the enclosed Structural Archaeological Assessment form and return it to me. Are any irrigation wells proposed? If so, this must be shown on the plans and a supplement form for a well permit will be required. Upon completion of the field inspection, a planting plan will be required. Please do not prepare a planting plan at this time in the event other modifications are required. 5 o Can the Greenport Sewerage Treatment Plant accept the increase in influent? o It appears the proposed community is out of jurisdiction for Article 25. Please provide a survey which shows elevation contour lines at two foot intervals, completed by a licensed surveyor, and referenced to USGVD, USC&G or NGVD. I I I I I ! I i I I I I I I I I I I Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. November 26, 1997 If you have any questions regarding this application please feel free to call me at 444-0365. Upon receipt of the requested information, the permit process will continue. Very truly yours, Carol A. Farkas Environmental Analyst CAF:cg enclosure cc: U.S. Retirement Communities I I I I I I I i I I I ! I I I I I I New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Telephone: (516) ?.~. 0305 Facsimile: (516) 444-0297 24 April 1998 John Cahill Commissioner Mr. Howard Young Mr. Thomas Wolpert Young and Young 400 Ostrander Ave. Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 RE: U.S. Retirement Communities for Peconic Landing. # 1-4738-000174/00001 Dear Howard and Tom: It was a pleasure to meet with you, Terry and the others on the seventh. I have tried to capture below, the substance of our discussions that day as follows: Phaxgmites control in the northern most pond will be limited to hand cutting and or the use of glyphosate only. The product name for the formulation approved in wetlands is Roundup. No excavation is allowed in the wetland. You will need to create a plan (a 1 or 2 page narrative) which outlines how this will be accomplished over the next few years. State that no excavation will occur and that the stalks of vegetation that will be cut, will be removed to a dry, upland location somewhere on site. It should also include the time of year when cutting and application will occur, that the cutting of desirable vegetation will be avoided and how the product will be applied (probably wicking). It is important to promise that a detailed plan will be submitted to our office for approval prior to commencement of the control program. You may want to offer that someone like Jeff Seeman be present as a vegetative consultant while the work is being done. This level of detail will suffice for purposes of the permit approval. Storm water overflow to the south wetland area has been eliminated. It appears that all runoff can be handled in the area of the old sand mine, greater that 100 feet from that wetland. You will be allowed to enhance access to the south wetland for the purposes of nature walks and study. A system of woodchip (or a similar natural mater/al) walking trails requiring minimal cleating of natural vegetation can be installed around this wetland and adjacent woodland. Minimal pruning of limbs is allowed to provide a view toward the sound, however since that area already has a fairly open under story and is such a beautiful spot, I would recommend that you try not to lollypop the surrounding trees. This will change the deeply shaded forest floor effect as the western sun is allowed to penetrate that woodland. At the very least, you may want to proceed cautiously with cutting and limbing because you won't be able to put it back once it is gone. I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I i The existing roadways may be converted to grass walking paths using topsoil and perennial grasses. The fill must be contained on the footprint of the existing roadways and erosion control structures must be employed in areas within 100 feet of tidal and freshwater wetlands, and remain in place until suitable vegetative cover is established. If you have other landscaping ideas for the paths, as long as they occur on the existing roadway footprint, I can probably approve them. I understand that all other areas of disturbance will be located greater than 100 feet landward of the wetlands and that you have already gotten a determination of non-jurisdiction from the tidal wetlands folks. The above details should be included in a revised site plan as well as the wetland line labeled according to the flagging letter we sent to you a week or so ago. If you have any questions about the application process or need more information, please give me a call. Sincerely, Stephen P. Lorence Regional Manager Bureau of Habitat ! ! I ! I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Main Road P,O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-18~2 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 29, 1998 Young & Young Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Peconic Landing SCTM ~35-1-25 Dear Mr. Wolpert: The above referenced property was inspected by a member of this Board. The construction of a residential life care community complex, revised survey dated May 19, 1998, was found to be out of the Trustees jurisdiction. This decision is not any type of approval from any other agency. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, President, Board of Trustees AJK:jmd cc: Bldg. Dept. Planning Board I I I I I Appendix 2 Wildlife & Habitat Literature Research USF&W Letter - August 20, 1997 NYSDEC Letter - August 26, 1997 i I I I I I ! I I I I I I Faxed 8/21/97, UnRed States Department of the Inter or FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 3817 Luker Road Cortland, New York 13045 August 20, 1997 i I I Mr. Seffrey L. Seeman, CEP/REM/QEP President Coastal Environmental Corporation 263 Lakeview Avenue, P.O. Box 602 Brightwaters, NY 11718 Dear Mr. Seeman: I I I I I I I I I I I This responds to your letters of July 27 and August 6, 1997, requesting inform;.Aon on the presence of endangered or threatened species in the vicinity of: 1. The Oatz Farm at Northville, Town of Riverhead, Suffolk County, New York, and, 2. The Pecon/c Landing~Brecknock Hall in the ~City' of GreenP0rt, Town 6f The information will be used in the preparation of Environmental Assessments. Except for occasional tranSient individuals,, no Federally listid or :propOsed endangered or threatened species under our jurisdiction are known to exist in the project impact area. Therefore, no Biological Assessment or further Section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.$.C. I531 et seq.) is required with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service). Should project plans change, or if addition.~J information on listed or proposed species becomes available, this deteL-mlnation may be reconsidered. A compilation of Federally listed and proposed endangered and threatened species in New York is enclosed for your i/fformat/on. The above comments pertaining to endangered species under our jurisdiction are provided pursuant to the Endangered Species Act. This response does not preclude additional Service comments under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act or other legislation. The National Wetlands Inventory (NWl) maps of tim Riverhead, (3reenport, and Orient Quadrangles are available and may show wetlands in the project vicinity. However, while the NWl maps are reasonably accurate, they should not be used in lieu of field surveys for determining the presence of wetlands or delineating wetland boundaries for Federal regulatory purposes. Work in certain waters and wetlands of the United States may require a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). If a permit is required, in reviewing the application pursuant to the Fish and Wildlife COordination ACt, the Service may concur. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I with or without stipulations, or recommend denial of the permit depending upon the potential adverse impacts on fish and wildlife resources associated with project implementation. The need for a Corps permit may be determined by contacting Mr. Joseph Seebode, Chief, Regulator7 Branch, U..S.. Army Corps of Engineers, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278 (telephone. [212] 264-~996). If you require additional information please contact Michael Stoll at (607) 753-9334. Sincerely, Sherry W. Morgan Field Supervisor Enclosure CC: NYSDEC, Stony Brook, NY 0~nv, Permits) NYSDEC, Latham, NY COE, New York, NY I ! I I I I FEDERALLY LISTED AND PROPOSED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES IN NEW YORK m~ss Sturgcon, shortnose* Turtle, bog Turtle, green* Turtle, hawksbill* I Turtle, leatherback* Turtle, loggerhead* Turtle, Atlantic ridley* Eagle, bald , Falcon, peregrine I Plover, piping Tern, roseate Bat, Indiana i Cougar, eastern Whale, blue* Whale, flnback* Whale, humpback* i Whale, right* Whale, se~* Whale, sperm* Acipenser brevirostrum Clemmys muhlenbergii Chelonia mydas Eretmochelys imbricata Dermochelys coriacea Caretta caretta Lepidochelys kempii Haliaeetus leucocephalus Falco peregrinus Charadrius melodus Sterna dougallii dougallii Myotis sodalis Fells concolor couguar Balaenoptera mtaculus Balaenoptera physalus Megaptera nova, eangliae Eubalaena glaclalis Balaenoptera borealis Physeter catodon E PT T E E T E T E E T E Hudson River & other Atlantic coastal rivers Albany, Columbia, Dutchess, Genesee, Orange, Oswego, Putnam, Seneca, Ulster, Wayne, and Westehester Counties Oceanic summer visitor coastal waters Oceanic summer visitor coastal waters Oceanic summer resident coastal waters Oceanic summer resident coastal waters Oceanic summer resident coastal waters Entire state Entire state - re-establishment m former breeding range in progress Great Lakes Watershed Remainder of coastal New York Southeastern coastal portions of slate E Emire state E Entire state - probably extinct E Oceanic E Oceanic E Oceanic E Oceanic E Oceanic E Oceanic Smil, Chittenango Succinea chittenangoensis T ovate amber I Mussel, dwarf wedge Alasmidonta heterodon E Madison County Orange County - lower Neversink River Except for sea turtle nesting habitat, principal responsibility for these species is vested with the National Marine Fisheries Service. I ! Region $ - 01/30/97 - 2 pp. I FEDERALLY LISTED A_ND PROPOSED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES IN NEW YORK (Cont'd) I Butterfly, Karner blue I I I Scientific Nar~ Slams Distribution Lycaeldes melissa samuelis E Albany, Saratoga, Warren, and Schenectady Counties I I I i I I i I I I i I Monkshood, northern wild Pogorda, small whorled Swamp pink ' Oerardia, sandplain Fern, American hart's-tongue Orchid, eastern prairie fringed Bulrush, northeastern Roseroot, Leedy's Amaranth, seabeach Goldenrod, Houghton's Aconitum noveboracense Isotria medeoloides Helonias bullata Agaltn~s acuta Asplentum s. colopendrium var. americana Platanthera Ieucophea $cirpus ancistrochaetus Sedum integrifolium ssp. Leeclyi Amaranthus purnilu, s, $olidago houghtontt T T T E T T E T T T Ulster, Sullivan, and Delaware Counties Entire state Staten Island - presumed extirpated Nassau and Suffolk Counties Onondaga and Madison Counties Not relocated in New York Not relocated in New York West shore of Seneca Lake Atlantic coastal plain beaches Genesee County E=endangered T=threatened P=proposed 2 · Region ~ · 01/30/97 - 2 pp, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Wildlife Resources Center 700 Troy-Schenectady Road Latham, New York I2110-2400 (~18) 78Z-3932 August 26, 1997 John P. Cahil! Commissioner Jeffrey L. Seeman Coastal Environmental Corp. 263 Lakeview Ave. West, PO Box 602 Brightwaters, NY 11715 Dear Mr. Seeman: We have reviewed the New York Natural Heritage Program files with respect to your recent request for biological information concerning ~he proposed 147 acre Lifecare Communky Development, site as indicated on your enclosed map, located in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York State. Enclosed is a computer printout covering the area you requested to be reviewed by our staff. The information contained in this report is considered sensitiv~ mad may not be released to the public without permission from Se New York Natural Heritage Program. Our files are cominually growing as new habitats and occurrences of rare species and communities are discovered. In most cases, site-specific or comprehensive surveys for plant and animal occurrences have not been conducted. For these reasons, we can only provide data which have been assembled from our files. We cannot provide a definitive statement on the presence or absence of species, habitats or natural communities. This information should gq'~ be substituted for on-site surveys that may be required for environmental assessment, This response applies only to known occurrences of rare animals and/or significant wildlit% habitats. You should contact our regional office, Division of Regulalory Affairs, at the address enclosed for information regarding any regulated areas or permits that may be required (e.g., re~lated wetlands) under State Law. If this proposed project is still active one year from now we recommend that you contact us again so that we may update this response. Sincerely, Deborah L. Albert Information Services NY Natural Heritage Program Enos. Reg. 1, Wildlife Mgr, USERS GUIDE TO NY NATUllAL 1q'KRITAGE DATA N~w Y~rk ~Tatu~ ~e~t~e ProCter, ?00 Tmy-~chet~aclMy l~mul, Latium1 lq~ 12110~400 phoae~ ($1~) 783-3~32 on the ~ro p~a,n~ ~ncl ammals n~ttve to lqcw y~ ~tat~, m~d s~n[fleant o:olo~.~e, aJ eommunit/~.. The d~ta .p..n~.'.ded in the ropott fae/I/tat~ sound plahnln~ em~vat/on, aha m~ resou~,~ m~a&ome~.I ~ad hdp to eon~vo the plant~, ~mmaJs*ad oe~o~oal eollu~unll/Os ~&t tree aha .noula not bc tek~med, at,rebuttal or m~lX~te~.in ~ publ/o docum~t vfitho ut prior perm./on f~om the lq'~ut al NATORAL HERITAGE REPORT~ (n~y ooatah ~ay of tho follow/rig ~ ofd~)~ , U80$ 7 ~,/' TO .L~.?AI~IIC MAP: 14'*me oC/.~ minute US Oeolo~/~ ~urvoy (U808) qwdnu~e m~p (~I~ I::M,000). , oe~uaenee v~m.. ~t (.nunu.~j pt~non, n~ ~ ImOW~ ~, mou~ to oecur ~uun · ~.~ m~ rsm,,, PP,.EC~*'tO~: 8 * ~nds: kg~thn known .nnsd~dy..(',~ddn · 300~ or !..~nd n~lius at'tt~ I~tud~ ~nd bn~Itud~ ~. mhu~c~ Io~n knm,m ~ ~o ~ldn ~ 1 ~ ndle( 1 ndn.?) radius o('~e la~ ,~? ~nd Ion~ude 0 - 8~netal: kea~hn I~ .ow~, te mv{~ · $ nu'ie ~adiu~ efO~ [aGlude ~d l~nii(ud~ ~v~. A~ - ~ A~_~kB~ ~ ~r,~t ~t ~ ~t ~ ~ a ~ o~A-D. NEW YO~ ~ATg ~A~S (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N~ Y~ 1) ~~ ~~~~lo fu~h~. ~e may ~ ~u~. . I I I I I NEW YORK :STATE STATUS (cemmuniti~): At rid* time ~oeo ~ no ~t~o~ define/for zommunltJg~. cont]nuo:{ on next page I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I pp. 39~2~ - 39~27. ' ~ - ~c ~on is folly fi~ u OU - S~a u~. SU - Sa~ un~o~. ~on ofL~e ~ ~ a TI ~u~T5 ?/22/96 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix 3 Peconic Landing Cut & Fill Calculations I I I I I Peconic Landing Acadr 14:Softdesk v8.0 Site: 970290 Site Volme Table: Adjusted Stratum: enir, etopo, ptopo Cut yards Fill yards Net Yards Method I I Site: 106,713 Community: 7,035 Center Apartment: I Complex 14,805 128,244 21,531 (fill) 7,035 (cu0 14,805 (cut) Grid Grid Grid I I I I I Total 128,553 128,244 (cut) I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix 4 Peconic Landing Traffic Assessment Prepared by: Ensign Engineering, P. C. TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT STUDY PECONIC TOWN of SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Prepared by: ENSIGN ENGINEERING, P.C. 3272 Tierney Place Bronx, New York w~w,v, ensigne u gineerin gocom February, 17t~, t998 I I I I I I I I I I i ! TABLE of CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................ Purpose of Report .................................. 1 Location ........................................... Study Approach ..................................... 3 STUDY AND ANALYSES ...................................... Roadway and Intersection Descriptions .............. 4 Traffic Volumes .................................... 4 Traffic Volume Forecasting ......................... 4 Site Trip Generation Analysis ...................... 8 Directional Distribution Analysis .................. 8 Build Condition - Year 1999 ........................ 8 Capacity Analysis ................................. 20 Site Accessibility ................................ 21 Planned Roadway Improvements ...................... 21 CONCLUSIONS ............................................ 21 APPENDIX ................................ Separate Document i I I I I I I I I I I i Purpose of Report ENSIGN ENGINEERING, P.C. performed a Traffic Assessment Study to determine the effects of the proposed development of the Peconic Landing Life Care Cu,~,unity on the existing local roadway network. Peconic Landing Life Care Co,,,,~nity is currently being designed by Ewing Cole Cherry Brott, Architects for U. S. Retirement Communities. Location The proposed Peconic Landing Life Care Co,m,unity site is located on the northside of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) just east of Sound Road in Greenport, in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. Figure 1 shows the project location. The site is approximate 145 acres and is currently undeveloped. The property has frontage on Main Road and extends north to the Long Island Sound. The proposed site access will be on the eastern side of the property frontage on Main Road, east of Manhasset Avenue. Noted, but not detrimentally, was the site location proximity to the Orient Point Ferry Terminal to the east. Traffic volume intensity was directly related to the ferry schedule. I · · Current Map,, ~ , · ..,,.: ,; .....:..: ...,,....,.,.~..,,,,.,.,.:,.,.,..,. ~.~..'.....~ :/ ,.. , ..... , ...~,,....,.;.,. . . .,. .. . ..... . ...~...~.......~,.;.,~ -,..¢,.~.. .... .~, ...... ; '~... .... .~ ...,.../.~j~ I ............... ,.. ........ ,,. ~. .,, ,, ,. .............. ,.~,'-- . "~ ", ~ · .*' .' ' ,'~..' ' ' .'".L ". ' , ..',', ' ',, ""~'~ .., ' ' ,,.'; . .. ..... ' .... . "'- ,.j. '~ ~ ,..,.,,, ,,.- ,.o,, ,,~,,. !;.'.':.,, ~,.,,..,' : ' ; ,..--" ,~ ; ,- , .;~. ........ ~ , ,,, . ..... . .,, x,,,,..~.l ..... , · ..~".,'" ," , t ' ..' ' ,~.:~ ,i .... . ,. ........ ,. / . , ' ~,'.'..."' .':':'l I .. . . ..,/ ..."~.......,. ...... '~ t ", ', FIGURE 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This traffic assessment study was prepared by performing the following tasks: 1. On site field observations were made to determine the local traffic trends. 2. A physical inventory was made of the local street network. Intersection turning movement counts were taken at the following intersections: Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25), Main Road (N.Y.S. Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) Route 25) Route 25) and Main Street (N.Y.S. and Manhasset Avenue, and and Bay Avenue. A trip generation analysis was performed to determine the additional traffic volume the proposed site would contribute to the local flows. A directional distribution was performed to determine how the proposed site generated traffic would affect the local roadway network. Capacity analyses were performed at the three intersections listed above to determine levels of service for existing, no-build, and project build conditions. Capacity analyses were performed at the proposed site access roadway to determine levels of service. 8. Site access was evaluated. Discussions were held with Suffolk County Department of Public Works personnel, The New York State Department of Transportation Planning Department and the Town of Southold Planning Department to determine if any additional proposed projects and/or roadway improvement projects were slated. 10. The results and facts of this study were compiled and conclusions draw on this projects impact on the local roadway network. 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STUDY AND ANALYSES Roadway and Intersection Descriptions At the site location, Main Road (N.Y.So Route 25) is the main thoroughfare, running east and west. The posted speed limit, just east of the site is 40 miles per hour. The three intersections were studied for this report; Main Street and Main Road, Main Road and Manhasset Avenue, Main Road and Bay Avenue, and as well as the proposed site access roadway. The intersection of Main Road (N.Y.S. Routes 48 and 25) and Main Street (N.Y.S. Route 25) is a T-intersection with east and westbound approaches on Main Road and a northbound approach on Main Street. The intersection is controlled by a flashing yellow signal on Main Road approaches and flashing red signal on the Main Street approach. The westbound approach of Main Road has a channelized left turn lane. The eastbound approach of Main Road has a channelized right turn lane. The northbound approach of Main Street has channelized right and left turn lanes. The intersection of Main Road and Manhasset Avenue has a stop sign control on the northbound Manhasset Avenue approach. The intersection of Main Road and Bay Avenue has a stop sign control on the northbound Bay Avenue approach. This intersection was selected for study to evalute the amount of local traffic the Greenport/East Marion communities contributed to the overall flows. Traffic Volumes Manual turning movement counts were taken on Thursday, January 15, 1998 between the hours of 7:00-9:00 a.m.; 11:00-1:00 p.m.; and 4:00-6:00 p.m.. The results of those counts are displayed in Diagrams 1 & 3. Traffic Volume Forecasting Two factors were taken into account for study purposes to insure a realistic analysis. First, since the weekday counts taken in January would be considered "off-season" for this locality a seasonal variation factor was added to each traffic volume. The volumes were increased by 12%, a factor the New York State Department of Transportation determined for this vicinity. 4 ENSIGN ENGINEERING, P.C. 3272 Tierney Pioce Bronx, New York ]0465 ROUTE ~5/48 [ 194/~84/3~9 ]~ 136/118/]64 148/i18/136 --~ [_~0--~-~4/~ ] Ld ¢) LO L~ DIAGRAM l .TURNING MBVEMEN'T DIAGRAM EXIS.TING AM/N]D/PM ROUTE 85 AND ROUTE 48 Thursday, Jor~uory ]5, ]998 By: TC EN§IGN ENGINEERING~ 3272 Tierney Ploce Bronx, New Yomk ]0465 RBUTE 25 194/194/226 I~ 192/183/216 ~~ 006/004/005 194/i88/229010/007/005 TURNING MOVEHENT DIAGRAH EXISTING AN/HID/PH ROUIE ~5 & HANHASSET AVE Thursdoy, Januory ]5, ]998 By, CdC ENSIGN ENGINEERING, P~C~ 3272 Tierney Place Bronx, New York ]0465 ROUTE 25 ooi/ooi×ooi DIAGRAM 3 TURNING HBVEHENT D]AGRAH EX]STING AN/H]D/PH RBU~E 85 & BAY AVENUE Thursdoy, Jomuo~y ]5, 1998 By: RGM I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I Second, a five year total build out was considered for this proposed project. With that anticipated, each volume has been increased by an additional 10% (two percent growth factor per year). Diagrams 4 through 6 show the increased traffic volumes, labeled as No-Build Condition - Year 2003. Site Trip Generation k nalysis The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) ' r ' 5th Edition. and 1995 Update was used in determining the site generated traffic. The basic land uses employed were "Retirement Community" based on 250 units and "Congregate Care Center" based on 56 units. Tables 1 through 3 summarize the anticipated entering and exiting traffic volumes for these classifications. These generated volumes of traffic are consistent with data provided by the U.S. Retirement Communities for comparable communities, which stated a 2.5 vehicle trips per day average. For comparative analysis, the trip generation for 350 unit "Residential Condominium" allowable zoning - land use was investigated. The generated traffic in each peak hour time period is greater for residential land use than that of the life care facility. Table 4 summarizes the trip generation calculations for residential condominium dwellings. Directional Distribution Analysis The distribution of the anticipated site generated traffic has been based on the existing directional split on Main Road at the proposed site access. This distribution is basically 50-50 based on the existing conditions, also compared with a N-YSDOT Average Weekday Hourly Report dated 10/95 (in Appendix). Build Con¢ition - year 2003 The Build Condition analysis includes the build out of the proposed project in the year 2003 (traffic adjustments included). Based on the Directional Distribution analysis, the site generated traffic was assigned to the roadway system and is represented in Diagram 7, and in Diagrams 8 through 10 for "Build Condition" of the intersections studied. ENSIGN ENGINEERING, P.C. 3272 Tierney Ptoce Bronx, New York 10465 RBUTE 25/48 [ 237/346/401 ]4 166/144/200 -"~~ oss/m/ioi ]05/09~/t00 - n c~ DIAGRAM 4 TURNING MDVEMEN7 D]AGRAN NB BUILD CnND]T]DN ROUTE 25 AND RBUTE 48 Tl~ur$cioy, Jo~uo~y :~5, ~998 ~y: TC ENSIGN ENGINEERING, P,C, 3272 Tierney Ptoce Bronx, New York 10465 I R~UTE 25 [ 2~7/237/276 ]~ 2~4/22~/26~ DIAGRA~ 5 TURNING HDVEHENT D]AGRAH ND BUILD CONDITION ROUTE 25 & NANHASSET AVE thursdoy, Jo~uory ]5, ~998 ~y: CJC ! ENSIGN ENGINEERING, P.C. 3272 Tierney Ploce Bronx, New York ~0465 ROUTE 25 001/001/001 009/0i3/015 DIAfi~AN 6 TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM ND BUILD CONDITION ROUTE 85 & BAY AVENUE Thursdoy, Jo~uo~y ]5, 1998 By~ I I I I PECONIC LANDING LIFE CARE SUMMARY OF AVERAGE VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION AVERAGE WEEKDAY DRIVEWAY VOLUMES JANUARY 1998 I I LAND USE SIZE 24 HOUR TWO-WAY VOLUME AM PK HOUR ENTER EXIT PM PK HOUR ENTER EXIT I I RETIREMENT COMMUNITY CONGREGATE CARE CTR. TOTAL 250 OCCUPIED UNITS 0 19 23 39 31 56 OCCUPIED I/NITS 120 2 1 5 4 120 21 24 Note: A zero rate indicates no rate data available 44 35 I i I I I I I I I I I TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS I I I I Peconic Landing SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION FOR 250 OCCUPIED UNITS OF RETIREMENT COMMTJNITY January 1998 AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT RATE DEVIATION FACTOR DRIVE WAY VOLUME I I l AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 0.08 0.00 1.00 19 0.09 0.00 1.00 23 0.17 0.41 1.00 43 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 0.16 0.00 1.00 39 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 0.12 0.00 1.00 31 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 0.28 0.53 1.00 70 I I I I SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 2.76 0.00 1.00 690 PK HR ENTER 0.14 0.00 1.00 34 PK HR EXIT 0.14 0.00 1.00 34 PK HR TOTAL 0.27 0.00 1.00 68 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 2.32 0.00 1.00 580 PK HR ENTER 0.11 0.00 1.00 27 PK HR EXIT 0.11 0.00 1.00 28 PK HR TOTAL 0.22 0.00 1.00 55 I I i I I I I Note: A zero rate indicates no rate data available Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 5th Edition, With Feb. 1995 Update. TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTPd%NS I i I I Peconic Landing SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION FOR 56 OCCUPIED UNITS OF CONGREGATE CARE CTR. January 1998 I I AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT RATE DEVIATION FACTOR AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL DRIVE WAY VOLUME 2.15 0.00 1.00 120 I I I 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 0.04 0.00 1.00 2 0.02 0.00 1.00 1 0.06 0.00 1.00 3 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 0.10 0.00 1.00 5 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 0.07 0.00 1.00 4 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 0.17 0.00 1.00 10 I I I I SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 0 .00 0.00 1.00 0 PK HR ENTER 0.00 0.00 1.00 PK ~R EXIT 0.00 0.00 1.00 PK HR TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1.00 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 PK HR ENTER 0.00 0.00 1.00 PK HR EXIT 0.00 0.00 1.00 PK HR TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1.00 I I I I I I Note: A zero rate indicates no rate data available Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 5th Edition, With Feb. 1995 Update. TABLE 3 TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTPJtNS I I I I Peconic Landing (Alternate Usage) SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION FOR 350 DWELLING UNITS OF RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM January 1998 AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT RATE DEVIATION FACTOR DRIVE WAY VOLUME I I I I AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 5.86 3.09 1.00 2051 0.07 0.00 1.00 26 0.37 0.00 1.00 128 0.44 0.69 1.00 154 0.36 0.00 1.00 127 0.19 0.00 1.00 65 0.55 0.76 1.00 193 I I I I SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 5.67 3.10 1.00 1985 PK HR ENTER 0.25 0.00 1.00 89 PK HR EXIT 0.22 0.00 1.00 76 PK HR TOTAL 0.47 0.71 1.00 165 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 4.84 2.71 1.00 1694 PK HR ENTER 0.22 0.00 1.00 77 PK HR EXIT 0.23 0.00 1.00 80 PK HR TOTAL 0.45 0.70 1.00 158 I I I I I I Note: A zero rate indicates no rate data available Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 5th Edition, With Feb. 1995 Update. TABLE 4 TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTP~ANS ENSIGN ENGINEERING, P.C. 3872 Tierney Pioce Bronx, New York :~0465 6j ! ~ 010/022 RBUTE ~5 D]AGRAN 7 TURNING NOVEHEN~ D]AGRAN SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC ~BUTE 85 AN~ SITE ACCESS ENSIGN ENGINEERING~ P.C, 3278 Tierney Ploce Bronx, New York ]0465 R~UTE 25/4S ~45/4~8 I~ I ]74/2~1 ~. 087/107 ]05/100 ~, ~~ ~mo ~ ~ DIAGRAN 8 TURNING HOVENENT D]AGRAW BUILD CONDITION RDUTE 25 AND ROUTE 48 Thursdoy, Jonuory ]5, 1998 9y: TC ENSIGN ENGINEERING, P.C, 3272 Tierney Ptoce Bronx, New York ~0465 ROUTE B5 , 246/281 I [ 248,293 1 -- ~ -- i°°7'°°6 I 0]2/006 ~~ ~~ DIAGRAN 9 TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM BUILD CONDITION R~UTE 25 6 N~NWASSET AVE Thursdoy, Jo~uory ]5, 1998 By: CJC ENSIGN ENGINEERING, P.C, 3272 Tierney P~cce Bronx, New York 10485 ROUTE 25 { 204/244 ]= ~98/228 I oos/ols Ld I I TURNING MBVEMENT DIAGRA~ BUILD CONDITION RouTE 85 & BAY AVENUE Thursdoy, Jc¢uory ]5, ]998 ~y: RGM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Capacity Analysis The Hiahwav Capacity Software. Release 2 Patch e: Updated 1997 was used to perform the analyses of the unsi~nalized intersections under study, including the site access. The analyses were conducted for the following conditions: 1. Existing volumes, January 15, 1998 No-Build Condition - Year 2003 forecasted volumes, including seasonal variation and growth factors. Build Condition - Year 2003 - all forecasted volumes plus anticipated site generated traffic. All worksheets for these analyses are contained in the Appendix to this report. The analyses indicate that the intersections studied are running at Levels of Service A. The Build Condition did bring the northbound left turn movement from Main Street onto westbound Main Road from a "B" to a level "C", which is still considered fair operating level. Although the methods for calculating Levels of Service are different for signalized and unsignalized intersections, the basic definitions are similar and are as follows: LOS A - describes operations with very low delay, up to sec per vehicle. This level of service occurs when progression is extremely favorable. LOS B - describes operations with delay greater than 5 and up to 15 sec per vehicle. This level generally occurs with good progression. LOS C - describes operations with delay greater than 15 and up to 25 sec per vehicle. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping. LOS D - describes operations with delay greater than 25 and up to 40 sec per vehicle. At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable.. LOS E - describes operations with delay greater than 40 and up to 60 sec per vehicle. This level is considered by many agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay. 20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LOS F - describes operations with delay in excess of 60 sec per vehicle. This level, considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with oversaturation. The results of the Build Condition capacity analyses indicate that the volumes of traffic generated by the Peconic Landing Life Care Facility development have very little impact on the surrounding roadway network. The Levels of Service at the intersection of Main Road and the site entrance of Peconic Landing are A for the Build Conditions. Table 5 summarizes the Levels of Service at all intersections studied. Site Accessibility The proposed site ingress/egress onto Main Road has ample sight distance in both east and west directions. Also, the capacity analysis done at the site access reveals easy ingress/egress during the peak hours of traffic. Planned Roadway Improvements In discussion with personnel from both the Suffolk County Department of Public Works, New York State Department of Transportation and the Town of Southold, there are no current plans for roadway improvements on any of State, County or Town roads in the project vicinity. Traffic Accident Trends In discussion with the Southold Police there are no apparent intersections or locations in the site vicinity with high accident levels. The results of this study have indicated that the proposed development of Peconic Landing Life Care Cu~,~,,~n±ty will have no significant impact on the immediate surrounding roadway network. 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I < < Z < I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at $outhold Lifecare Community Southold, New York LEAF Narrative: Response to Commnets L 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. References Reducing the Impacts of Stormwater Runoff From New Development, NYSDEC, Albany, NY, April 1993. Design of Storm~vater Wetland Systems, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC, October, 1992. Classification of Wetlands & Deepwater Habitats of the United States, US Dept. of the Interior, Washington, DC, December 1979. Soil Survey of Suffolk County, New York, USDA, Washington DC, April 1975. Stormwater & Nonpoint Source Pollution Control, Best Management Practices Manual, NJDEP/NJDA, Trenton, NJ, December 1994. Ecological Communities of New York State, NYSDEC, Latham, NY, March 1990. Freshwater Wetlands Delineation Manual, NYSDEC, Albany, NY March 1995. Creating Freshwater Wetlands, Hammer, D. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, 1992. Engineering Field Manual for Conservation Practices, US Soil Conservation Service, Washin0ton, DC, July 1984. Suffolk County Department of Health Services Groundwater Contour Map, March, 1997. Water Resources Data New York, Vol. 2, USGS, Coram, NY, 1997. Survey of the Big Trees at Brecknock Hall, the Proposed Development Site for Pecenic Landing at Southold, Suffolk County, IVY, Lamont, E., May 1997. Preliminary Report on Sensitive Ecological Areas at Brecknock Hall, the Proposed Development Site for Pecenic Landing at Southold, Suffolk County, NY, Lamont, E. July 1997. Coastal Environmental Corporation I I I PeconJc Landing at Southold Lifecare Communitq I I I I I I I i I I I ! i i I Southold. New York Long Environmental Assessment Form September 1~)~)7 Narrative Prepared bg Coastal Environmental Corporation 265 Lokeview Avenue ~Jest Brightwotcrs, New York /1718 SEP I 8 1997 I Peconic Landing Lifecare CornrnuniO, iSouthold, Ne**, York Proposed Action: Location: Applicant: Agency: Preparer(s): Date: I I I Revision of Approved Site Plan: Peconic Landing Lifecare Community at Southold North-side of Main Road (NYS Route 25), approximately 1,100 feet east of Sound Road Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000-35-25 Greenport, Town of Southold, New York U.S. Retirement Communities on Behalf of Peconic Landing 101 Chesley Drive Media, PA 1962 Tel. (610) 627 2330 Planning Board - Town of Southold Town Hall - 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Tel. (518) 785 1938 / Fax (516) 765 3136 Environmental Consultant: Coastal Environmental Corporation 263 Lakeview Avenue West - PO Box 602 Bdghtwaters, New York t 1718 Tel. (516) 666 3825 / Fax (516) 665 1538 Jeffrey L. Seeman, CEP/REM/QEP Engineers/Surveyors: Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, NY 11910 Traffic Consultant: Ensign Engineering, PC 3272 Tierney Place, Bronx, NY 10465 September 1997 I I Peconic Landing at Southold Lifecare Community Southold, Ner~ York LEAF Narrative Table of Contents I Section Pa~_e I. · Executive Summary · Introduction · List of Approvals and/or Permits 1 11 I, · Existing Environmental Setting 12 i · Project Related Environmental Concerns & Controls Fio_ur~s I Location Map 2O I Photographs 6 I Long Environmental Assessment Form Ensign Engineering, P.C. - Traffic Statement Natural Resource Correspondence Number 1 2 3 I Coastal Environmental Corporation I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I i i I I I I I Peconic Landing at $outhold Lifeeare Community Southold, New York LEAF Narrative · Executive Summary The Peconic Landing Lifecare Community is an application for the revision of an approved site plan formally known as LBV Properties - The Breakers at Lands End. Compared to the original application, the revised plan: Minimizes disturbance to Brecknock Hall and its adjacent surroundings. Peconic Landing at Southold eliminates the conversion of Brecknock Hall, a 19th century stone building with cultural value, into a restaurant and eliminates a retail center originally proposed for the area which fronts NYS 25. Results in approximately fifty percent less sewage flow to the Village of Greenport's treatment facility. This allows municipal sanitary service to be extended to other users and reduces the site's quantity of treated wastewater discharged to the Long Island Sound. Connection to the treatment plant minimizes the impact of wastewater disposal on groundwater. · Requires approximately 64,000 gallons per day (GPD) of potable water from the Village of Greenport; the Breakers required 200,000 GPD. Increases wetland habitat areas by providing 1.8 acres of constructed freshwater wetlands and 1.6 acres of open water ponds and enhances existing freshwater wetlands. · Utilizes constructed detention ponds and bio-filters to control site generated stormwater run-off and non-point pollution controls that are consistent with NYSDEC guidelines to minimize potential impact to groundwater from "first-flush" pollutants. · Includes 37.9 acres of Scenic Easements and open space areas which provide protection to vegetation, wildlife, cultural resources and drinking water supplies. · Protects bluff areas against erosion in accordance with NY State Coastal Erosion Management Regulations. · Does not allow children. Therefore no increase in the number of pupils attending the local public schools will result from the project. Coastal Environmental Corporation I I I I t i 1 I I ! I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at Southold Lifecare Community Sowthold, New York LEAF Narrative Provides on-site security and emergency response services which minimize dependency on community services. Provides healthcare services which minimize dependency on the local community health services. Offers the senior population an alternative living environment. Coastal Environmental Corporation I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing ~ ,¥outhoid Lifecare Community · ¥outhold, New York LEAF Narrative · Introduction In accordance with requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Regulations (6 NYCRR Part 617) the applicant has attached with this report, as Appendix 1, a Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF). The purpose of this LEAF Narrative is to provide additional Part 1. (D) Information Details to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, acting as Lead Agency, for the Determination of Significance. The LEAF Narrative describes the components of the project, the effects on the environment and appropriate measures to avoid, minimize and/or mitigate potential adverse environmental conditions. The focus of the Narrative is placed on the folloWng environmental concerns: Water Resources Vegetation & Wildlife Habitats Open Space & Land Use Bluff Area Erosion Freshwater Wetlands Traffic Proposed Action The proposed project is known as Peconic Landing at Southold Lifecare Community and is an application to amend an approved site plan (Wolowitz Organization & LBV Properties - "The Breakers at Lands End)" to reflect a residential lifecare community with support amenities: Single Family Detached Residential Cottage Attached Apartment Units Total 118 250 Assisted Living Center Units Skilled Care Center Beds Total Amenities Dining Rooms Auditorium Greenhouse Wood Shop Physician Office Swimming Pool Health Center Bank Walking Paths 24-Hour Security 24 Community Center Library Child Care Center Tennis Courts Mail Center Sundry Shop Bike Paths Beauty/Barber Shop Emergency Response System Coastal Environmental Corporation I ! Peconic Landing ~ $outhoid Lifecar¢ Commuai~ Southoid, New York LEAF Narrative I I The applicant is Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. The developer is US Retirement Communities, Inc. of Media, Pennsylvania, a corporation experienced in the successful development and management of retirement living facilities. There are no public funds required for this project. I I I I I i I I Location and Site Description The project is located along the north side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) approximately 1,100 feet east of Sound Road and immediately west of Island End Golf & Country Club, Greenport, Town of Southold. The land affected is 144.7708 acres, designated as Suffolk County Tax Map 1000-35-1-25. The parcel is zoned Hamlet Density Residential District (HD) and Limited Business District (LB). The proposed site plan amendment is consistent with land use regulations. The site contains several uncommon features including the 19th century two-story stone building, known as Brecknock Hall; ornamental and native mature tree species which are part of the existing Brecknock Hall landscaped grounds; two freshwater wetlands; a maritime oak-beech forest, along the site's easterly boundary; bluffs which rise 45 feet above the sand-cobble beach of Long Island Sound and associated maritime shrubland vegetation; successional fields and shrublands associated with abandoned farming activities. The site also contains a municipal water supply well and pump station which is part of the Village of Greenport's water supply and distribution system; a series of dirt roads; and eleven outbuildings. The majority of the site consists of well drained and moderately well drained soils. The site is not located within a Special Groundwater Protection Area and is shown on the Suffolk County Sanitary Code-Article 6 Map within Groundwater Management Zone IV. The depth to groundwater is estimated at a minimum of 0 feet and maximum of 50 feet. I Water Supply and Sanitary Disposal The revised site plan includes an on-site pump station and force main designed to discharge to the municipal, Village of Greenport sanitary sewage collection system. I The projected daily sanitary flow is 51,690 GPD and within an acceptable quantity available to connect to the municipal system. Water supply is available from the municipally operated Village of Greenport water system with expected water use of I about 64,000 GPD. I Coastal Environmental Corporation I 2 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Lana~n~ a~ ~5'outhold Lifeeare Communi~ ,Your&old, New York LEAF Narrative Stormwater Management Stormwater will be managed by an on-site, engineered, storm sewer collection system. Run-off will be conveyed to catch basins and, together with building roof drains, connected to the system. The discharge for the site's stormwater collection system will be to a storage and treatment pond designed to incorporate a bio-engineered pollutant control system. The system includes constructed detention ponds and channeled streams fringed with high marsh and Iow marsh wetlands. It is designed to reduce total susupended solids, total phosphorous, total nitrogen, BOD, COD, lead, zinc and bacteria. The system also provides for additional open space, aquatic habitat area and visual benefits. Open Space Scenic Easements on the parcel were granted to the Town of Southold in 1983. The purpose of the Scenic Easement is to preserve natural scenic beauty and natural resources and enhance the present or potential value of abutting and surrounding properties. The Scenic Easement around .the southerly section of the parcel provides approximately 31.82 acres of scenic space. The easement abuts Brecknock Hall, a stone mansion built around 1857 and its surroundings. It includes an existing freshwater wetland and a proposed constructed wetland system; and the existing Village of Greenport water supply well. Brecknock Hall is a twenty room mansion built with ship ballast stone for David Gelston Floyd (grandson of General William Floyd, Revolutionary War), a whaling entrepreneur. A second Scenic Easement is designated around the northerly freshwater wetland system and includes approximately 6.12 acres. Due to the Scenic Easement; existing vistas at the southerly area of the site are not expected to be significantly altered. The general easement conditions do not permit buildings (except utility structures), lumbering (except for improved landscaping and infrastucture), soil removal for sale off-site or public access and public park use. The site's easterly boundary is adjacent to a semi-private golf course and country club; at the northerly boundary is the Long Island Sound and it is bounded along the southerly side by NYS Route 25. The site is bordered to the westerly side by single family residential homes. Bluff Area Beach access will be via paths located along the northern pond. Bluff line protection shall be in accordance with New York State Coastal Erosion Management Regulations (6NYCRR Part 505). Coastal Environmental Corporation 3 I I I I I i I I I I I I I i I I I I I Peconia Landing ~ $outhold Zifecare Community Southol~ New York LEAF Narrative Traffic Site access will be from NYS Route 25. Two access points are proposed, one located (+/-) 275 feet easterly of Manhasset Avenue and the second located (+/-) 550 feet westerly of Manhasset Avenue. A preliminary traffic assessment statement was conducted in conjunction with this LEAF Narrative. The results of the study indicate that the Peconic Landing Lifecare Community will function at a satisfactory level with the existing traffic in the immediate vicinity. Sight distances from the site access points are adequate. Coastal Environmental Corpora~on I I I I I I I I I I Pec~ic L~mdlng I. ifecare Commun~ $outhold, New Yo~k S 0 U N D I I I I SITE LOCATION STIR PIt~ES COVE Location Map peconic Lauding Lifecare Facility Town of $outhold, New York I' = (+/-) 2.~0' lNG Coastal Environmental Corporation I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing Site Photographs August 1997 t. Brecknock Hall NYS Route 25 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing Site Photographs August J997 Water Supply Pump Station 4. Caretaker House I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing Site Photographs August 1997 Sand Mine Pit Site Vegetation I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing Site Photographs August 1997 7. North We~nd 8. South Wetland I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I ! ! I I I Peconic Landing Site Photographs August 1997 ShOreline & Bluff at Long Island Sound 10, Bluff Line to Long tsland Sound I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pe¢onic Landing at $outhold Lifecare CommuniO, Soutbold, New York LEAF Narrative · List of Required Approvals and/or Permits m.v~e Site Plan Approval Coastal Erosion Permit Wetland Permit Building Permit Agency Southold Planning Board Southold Trustees Southold Trustees Southold Building Dept. Status Pending Pending Pending Incomplete Water Supply Article 4 Sewage Disposal Article 6 Site Plan Approval (referral) Backflow Prevention Device(s) State of New York Suffolk County Dept. of Pending Health Services & Greenport Water Dept./Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services & Greenport Sewer Dept. Pending Suffolk County Planning Commission incomplete Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Incomplete Wetland Permit Article 24 & 25 NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation - Region I Highway Work Permit NYS Dept. of Transportation Incomplete Incemplete Certificate of Authority NYS Dept. of Health Filed & Pending Coastal Environmental Corporation 11 I ! ! Peconic Landing at ,¥outbold Lifecare Community Soutbold, Ne., York LEAF Narrative · Existing Environmental Setting Background and History In 1986-87, site plan applications were filed with the Town of Southold for a project locally known as "The Breakers at Lands End", a residential condominium project consisting of 350 units; and a retail/restaurant complex called "Breakers Village." The Breakers Village included 13,910 square feet (SF) of retail floor space located on the property which fronts NYS Route 25, and a restaurant and bar proposed at the Brecknock Hall building with a proposed occupancy of 135 seats. Parking wes provided with 178 stalls. I i I I I During the application, the property (SCTM # 1000-35-1-25) was zoned as "Limited Business." The Breakers Village and the Breakers at Lands End had been proposed by the Wolowitz Organization of Greenvale, New York. The parcel wes later acquired by LBV Properties. The proposed Peconic Landing lifecare community is a request to change the "Breakers" approved site plan to the site plan prepared by Young & Young, for Peconic Landing at Southold (September, 1997). Based on the site's existing vegetation and topographic features, and informal interviews with individuals associated with its prior use, the parcel wes used for agricultural purposes. It has been reported (albeit unconfirmed) that the site was used to raise black Angus cows. Currently there is no agricultural activity. The land is managed by a caretaker who resides on site. Coastal Environmental Corporation 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at $outhold Lifecare Cornrnuni~y Southold, New York LEAF Narrative Soils The soil types are described by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Suffolk County: New York. The mapped soil types and a brief description of their characteristics that are relevant to the site development activities are summarized below Soil Tvoe Characteristics Beaches(Bc) Gravel/cobble, slopes (~_ 15%) Carver & Plymouth (CPC) Sand (3-15%) Rolling moraines; rapid permeability; generally woodlands Haven Loam (HaA) (0-2%) Moderate permeability at sur[ace, rapid in subsurface; fairly level Haven Loam (HaB) (2-6%) Along drainage swales; suitable for housing development Riverhead Sandy Loam (RaB) (3-8%) Moderate permeability; suitable for housing development Riverhead Sandy Loam (RdC) (8-15%) Moderate permeability; suitable for housing development Muck (Mu) Poorty drained organic; water table at or near the surface Plymouth Loamy Sand (8-15%) PIC Rapid permeability; suitable for housing development Quarry Sand mine pits Coastal Environmental Corporation 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at $outhold Lifeeare Cornmuni~y $oathol~ New York LEAF Narrative The depth to the seasonal high water table may vary within each major soil series. A summary of the variation is presented below Major Soil Series Carver (CPC) Depth to Seasonal / >4 Haven (HaA; HaB) >4 Plymouth (PIC) >4 Rivethead (RdB; RdC) >4 Muck (Mu) 0-1.5 Based on the soil type, vegetation and annual precipitation an estimate of average annual recharge was determined for the site. This estimate is based on the following assumptions: Average Precipitation: Evapotranspiration loss: Area: Impervious areas: 43 inches per year 50% 145 acres negligible - 0% The groundwater recharge is estimated to be 84,822,498.75 gallons per year or 260.3 acre feet of water per year. Water Resources The site is adjacent to the Long Island Sound a marine system that abuts the north shore of Long Island. The Long Island Sound has been the subject of recent studies (EPA Long Island Sound Study) that identified stressed conditions on the waterbody's water quality and ecosystems. One primary concern is the lack of dissolved oxygen (hypoxia) found in the water column. Among the recommendations to reduce oxygen demand were: Coastal Environmental Corporation 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Land~ng m $'outhold L~fecare Community S'outhol~ New York LEAF Narrative rehabilitation and upgrade of publicly owned treatment works which discharge nitrogen to the Sound; control of stormwater run-off within the Sound's drainage basin area to decrease pollutant loads; and improved planning of shoreline development. The tributaries that discharge to the Sound from New York and Connecticut waterways also contribute to the waterbody's pollution. The majority of these impacts can be associated with Iow oxygen levels areas in the Sound along western Long Island, New York City and Connecticut's coastline and rivers. Although the Sound and its inlets are tidal, the ability of the daily tide changes to effectively flush pollutants from the deeper water in western sections of the Sound is poor, and adds to the problem of hypoxia. The Town of Southold is participating in the Long Island Sound's long range corrective action plans and coastal development must conform with these goals. The site contains two freshwater wetland systems. For simplicity of identification, these are referenced as the north wetland and south wetland named with respect to their locations within the site. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) has designated the north wetland as GP-11 on the State Freshwater Wetland Map. The north wetland is a Scrub-Shrub Wetland which has been disturbed and invaded by Phragmites and other non-native species. The south wetland is a relatively undisturbed Forested Wetland. Both wetland systems include open water ponds. The south wetland is approximately 0.80 acres and the north wetland is approximately 2.81 acres. The freshwater wetlands are regulated by the NYSDEC pursuant to Article 24. The State's minimum setback is 100 feet from the wetland delineation line for construction related activity; unless a permit issued by the State provides for deviation. In January 1992, the NYSDEC issued an Article 24 Freshwater Wetlands Permit for the Wolowitz Organization's "Breakers at Land's End" project. The permit authorized clearing and filling within 100 feet of the freshwater wetlands to be no closer than 50 feet from the wetlands edge, except at a 20 foot wide section where excavation and installation of a drainage overflow discharge pipe would have been allowed to the watland's edge. A review of the February 1986 the Breakers at Lands End Preliminary Site Plan for Water Supply and Sanitary Sewage Systems on file with Southold did not show the State's wetland delineation boundary. Based on the topographic survey, Suffolk County Health Department groundwater maps, soil classifications identified by Coastal Environmental Corporation 15 I I 1 ! i I i I I I I I I I I I I I Peeonic Landing a~ ,Your&old Lifecare Community ,~outhoi~ New York LEAF Narrative groundwater is the primary supporting water source for both the north and south freshwater wetland systems. The Village of Greenport offered the following information regarding the existing water supply well: Capacity: 200 GPM Depth: 60 feet Installed: 1985 - renovated 1993 Status: Operational as drinking water supply well The Village also operates the sanitary treatment plant. It is designed for a maximum capacity of 650,000 GPD. The plant currently operates at peak flow between 450,000 - 500,000 GPD. The plant's final discharge point is through a marine out'fall pipe to Long Island Sound. The Village is planning to expand the capacity of the plant for a maximum capacity of 800,000 GPD. Vegetation & Wildlife Habitats The site's existing vegetation can be described as: Maritime Oak-Beech Forest - located along the eastern boundary and adjacent to the Islands End Golf Course is a forest dominated by Red Oak, (Quercus rubra), Black Oak (Quercus valutina) White Oak (Quercus alba) and American Beech (Fagus grandifolia). Also present are Pignut Hickory (Carya glabra), and Red Maple (Acer rubrurn). Red Maple is associated with wetlands on Long Island but within this forest it occurs as an upland species. There are scattered individuals of Paper Birch (Betula papyrifera) and Gray Birch (Betula populifolia), the latter being the more common species found throughout Long Island. The forest understory is dominated by dense stands of Mountain Laurel (Kalmia latifolia), Flowering dogwood (Comus florida), and Shadbush (Arnelanchier canadensis). Common herbs in the groundcover include Wild Sarsaparilla (Ara/ia nudicaulis), Canada Mayflower (Maianthemurn canadensis), and Wild Geranium (Geranium rnnaculaturn). There are few non-native plant species that have invaded the ecosystem. The forest has been historically cut and is not virgin. Disturbed areas with younger growth include Black C'oastal Environmental Corporalion 16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at Soathold Lifecare Community Soathoid, New York LEAF Narrative Locust ( Robina pseudoacacia ), Japanese Honeysuckle ( Lonicera japonica), Oriental Bittersweet ( Celastrus orbiculatus), and Multiflora Rose (Rosa multiflora). Bluff-top Vegetation - located along the north edge of the site is the bluff line. Historically the Maritime-Oak Forest probably extended to the bluffs. Currently the bluff-tops still have a few dwarf beech and oak trees but is best described as a Maritime Shrubland. This community is a thicket comprised of Northern Bayberry ( Mydca pensylvanica ), Winged Sumac ( Rhus copallinum), Smooth Sumac ( Rhus g/abra), Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana), Wild Black Cherry (Prunus serotina), Northern Arrowwood (Virburnum recgnitum), Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Salt Spray Rose (Rosa rugosa) anti Wild Grape (Vitis labrusca). The Maritime Shrubland community is found throughout New York's Coastal Lowlands ecozone and is not considered rare. Some non-native species of plants that have invaded the edges of the Maritime shrublands include Autum Olive ( Elaeagnu$ umbellate), Multiflora Rose (Rosa multiflora), Morrow's Honeysuckle (Lonicera morowi~) and Black Locust (Robina pseudoacacia). Maritime Beach Vegetation - located along the shoreline of the Long Island Sound, along the toe of the slope formed by the bluffs, the Maritime Shrubland community changes to Maritime Beach. The region is sparsely vegetated due to the unstable sand and cobble beach, exposure to salt spray and periodic flooding. Vegetation found here included Beach Grass (Ammophila breviligulata). Although several rare plants are known to occur at the upper edges of cobble beaches along Long Island Sound in the Greenport area, none were located during site visits. Successional Fields & Shrublands - the majority of the existing site was once plowed for farming and is in the process of the ecological transformation of succession. Somesections of the site are in the successional old field stage, but the majority of the property is successional shrubland. The species found here include Golden Rod (Solidago canadensis), Common Evening Prim Rose (Oenothera biennis), Rag Weed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), Queen Anne's Lace (Daucus corota), Service berries (Arnelanchier spp.), Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana), Raspberries (Rubus spp.), Northern arrowwood (Viburnum recognitum), Mutifiora Rose (Rosa multiflora), and Wild Grape (Vitis labrusca). This is a common ecological community found on Eastern Long Island where former farmlands were abandoned. Rare native plants and animals do not usually occur in these disturbed Coastal Environmental Corpora~on 17 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at $outhold Lifecare Cormnun~y Southold, New York LEAF Narrative abandoned. Rare native plants and animals do not usually occur in these disturbed areas but common species of wildlife depend on this area for food, habitat and nesting sites. Successional Southern Hardwoods - sparse woodlands that contain a mixed forest can be found scattered on the site. These are areas that had been cleared for farming or select logging. Dominant trees include gray birch (Betula populifolia), Sassafras (Sassafras albidum), Red Maple (Acer rubrum), Silver Maple (Acer saccharinum) and Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana). These areas are found adjacent to the Maritime Oak-Beech Forest. This is a fairly common habitat on Long Island in areas previously farmed or cleared. Freshwater Wetlands - located in the north and central area of the site are two wetlands that are supported by freshwater. The south wetland is a Forested Weltand. It includes Red Maple (Acer rubrum), American Beech (Fagus grandifolia ), Tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica), H ighbush Blueberry ( Vaccinium oxycoccos), Tussock-sedge ( Carex stricta), Jewelweed, (Impatiens capensis), Blue Flag (Iris versicolor) and Sweet Flag (Acorus calamus). This wetland system provides diversity of plant species because it is partially open to sunlight, is partially shaded by the forest canopy, and has a variety of water levels (from six inches below the soil to +/- 2 feet of standing water). This system may also experience fluctuations in seasonal and yearly groundwater levels from one to four feet. It is likely that this wetland system can sustain freshwater salamanders and frogs. The north is a Scrub-Shrub Wetland. It includes a dominance of Phragmites and contains Multiflora Rose (Rosa multiflora), Winged Sumac (Rhus copallinum) and Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). The south edge of the system also includes Red Maple (Acer rubrum). The north wetland has a lower diversity of plants which may be attributable to the Phragmites, an aggressive species which competes for common space needed to support other plants. The existing terrestrial and aquatic habitats are expected to support a wide variety of common, Long Island birds, reptiles, amphibians and mammals. These organisms may occur as sedentary and/or migratory species. A literature search was conducted of State and Federal files for species and habitats of significant concern that exist at the site or within a reasonable proximity. The New York State Department of State has determined that the site is not within or contiguous to a State designated "Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat" area. The New York State Natural Heritage Program Coastal Environmental Corporation 18 I I I [ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at $outhold Lifecare Community Southold, New York LEAF Narrative the Greenport-Southold area, however these plants were not found at the site (Lamont, 1997.) The U. $. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service has determined that, except for occasional transient individuals, no Federally listed or proposed endangered or threatened species under Federal jurisdiction are known to exist in the project impact area. Open Space & Land Use The existing site is largely undeveloped, and offers considerable open space values. The +/- 145 acres contains bluffs; beach area; upland woodlands; old fields; successional and maritime shrublands; freshwater wetlands; and cultivated plantings. The site is privately owned and public access is restricted. The site has not been designated as a significant habitat area, proposed as parkland, provided special groundwater protection status or farmland preservation status. The Town of Southold was granted an area of Scenic Easement on the site of approximately 37.93 acres. The easement preserves the natural resource values associated with the site. The current zoning permits uses that are compatible with Hamlet Density zoning. The 19th century stone building known as Brecknock Hall does have cultural resource value. This structure and its surrounding grounds will be largely unaffected by the project. Potential future use of the hall as a performing arts center is expected to provide a mech,anism for its preservation. The surrounding area land uses include a cemetery, residential single family dwellings, a golf course and undeveloped lands. Traffic Current site access is from NYS Route 25; a two lane State highway which travels east and west. Current (,AM & PM peak vehicle trips per hour) existing traffic volume data reported from municipal agencies and from field counts conducted at the site's proposed ingress/egress to NYS Route 25 (Friday, August 8, 1997) indicate the following conditions: Vehicle Trips/Hour Vehicle Trips/Hour Westbound Eastbound Peak: AM PM Peak: AM PM 320 352 384 422 Coastal Environmental Corpora~on 19 I I i I I I i I I I I i I i I I I I i I Peconic Landing at $outhold life_care Community Southold, New York LEAF Narrative · Project Related Environmental Concerns & Controls Water & Wastewater The environmental concerns associated with proposed revisions to the approved site plan application prepared for the Breakers at Lands End that reflect the Peconic Landing Lifecare Community proposal are best presented on a comparative basis. The original Breakers included 350 condominium housing units. The sanitary sewage flows expected from the Breakers residential development is estimated at 105,000 GPD (based on Suffolk County Department of Health estimated flow of 300 GPD per unit). The projected water use was estimated at 200,000 GPD (agreement between the Village of Greenport & Breakers for water supply). The wastewater requirements of Peconic Landing are estimated to be approximately 50% less. ' Summa~ of Sanita~. Design Flows: Residential Single Family Detached Units Apartments Sub-total Commercial Community Center Health Center Sub-total Future Peffoming Arts Center Grand Total 17,700 GPD 19.800 GPD 37,500 GPD 5,291 GPD 8.899 GPD 14,190 GPD 53,190 GPD Breakers 105,000 GPD The estimated water use for Peconic Landing is based upon the sanitary flows estimated for the project, plus 20%. This figure does not include irrigation water. Summa~. of Water Use; Residential Single Family Detached Units Apartments Sub-total Commercial Community Center Health Center Sub-total Future Performing Arts Center Grand Total 21,240 GPD 45,000 GPD 6,350 GPD 10.680 GPD 17,020 GPD 63,830 GPD Breakers 200,000 GPD Coastal Environmental Corloora~on 2O I I Peconic Landing ,ri $outhold L if ecar e Community Southold, New York LEAF Narrative ! ! Two factors that contribute to a reduction in the revised site plan estimated water use and wastewater discharge are (1) a reduction in the number of residential units and (2) the limited number of people residing in each unit (either one or two persons) with no children. I I I I I The original and the revised project are both designed to connect to municipal water supply and wastewater systems. The revised plan is expected to have a lower impact on these utility services because of a reduction in quantities of water supply and sanitary sewage disposal required by the project. Secondary impacts including energy required to supply water and treat the sanitary wastes will be less. The Village of Greenport Sewage Treatment Plant will also have additional capacity available. Minimizing additional flows of treated sanitary waste to Long Island Sound is consistent with goals of the Long Island Sound Study. The Breakers site plan included a system of nine (9) ponds; seven (7) of which ware manmade and presumably lined with a substrate of a Iow permeability. The original application included a proposed 30 GPM irrigation well designed to pump groundwater into the system of manmade ponds. The revised project does not require an on-site wall and impacts to groundwater are lessened. i Stormwater Management i I i I i I The revised project does include constructed ponds and channel systems as part of the revised positive overflow, stormwater control system. The system is designed to meet Town of $outhold stormwater control requirements and includes the collection of site generated surface and roof top run-off. The collected stormwater will discharge to a Bio-filter; a bio-engineered stormwater treatment system. The stormwater enters a micropool; used to detain the stormwater and allow sediments to settle from the water column. The micropool will discharge to a meandering channel, vegetated with plant material selected to tolerate periodic flooding. The vegetation will slow the velocity of the stormwater flow and filter out sediments. The vegetation will also reduce pollutants associated with stormwater run-off (nitrogen, phosphorus, oil and grease). The filtered stormwater will enter a second, downstream micropool. A riser and outlet will be installed at the micropool. The outlet elevation is designed to discharge stormwater from the secondary micropool to the existing south freshwater watland when site generated run-off exceeds the system's design capacity. The stormwater Coastal Environmental Corporation 21 I I I I I I I I i I I I I i I i I I I Peconic Landing at $outhold L~fecare Community Soathold, New York LEAF Narrative control system flows by gravity; no mechanical equipment is required. The stormwater will infiltrate to groundwater and provides recharge to the Upper Aquifer. Elevations of the micropools and vegetated streams are designed to expose groundwater. There will be minor impacts to the south freshwater wetlands caused by the installation of the discharge pipe. The constructed area of wetlands created for the stormwater control system will increase the total on-site areas of aquatic and freshwater wetland habitats. The stormwater management system is consistent with NYSDEC guidelines for stormwater management and erosion control practices (Reducing the Impacts of Stormwater Runoff from New Development, NYSDEC, 1993) and recommendations of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments for the design of stormwater wetland systems in the mid-Atlantic region. The stormwater control system also provides open space, existing habitat protection and enhancement of visual aspects associated with the project. The reduction of stormwater discharge to Long Island Sound is consistent with the goals of the Long Island Sound Study. The stormwater management system is expected to reduce poluutants. The pollutant removal capability of stormwater wetlands has been estimated by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Goverments: Projected Long Term Removal Rates For Mid-Atlantic Storrnwater Wetlands Pollutant Removal Rate Total Suspended Solids 75% Total Phosphorus 45% Total Nitrogen 25% Organic Carbon (BOB & COD) 15% Lead 75% Zinc 50% Bacteria 2 log reduction It is reasonable to predict that the Peconic Landing at Southold stormwater management system pollutant removal capability will be within this range. Bluff Area Protection against bluff area erosion will be provided through a minimum principal building setback of 100 feet from the bluff line. Grading will be limited to within 40 feet Coastal Environmental Corporation 22 I I I i 1 I 1 ! I I I I I I i I I 1 I I Peconic Landing at $oathold Lifecare Cornmun~ $oathold, New York LEAF Narrative of the bluff line. To minimize potential impacts during construction, it is proposed that a protective barrier fence and signage be installed along the setback boundary prior to site grading and construction activies. Walkways will be constructed solely for pedestrian use and will provide limited non-commercial access to the beach. The walkways will be within the setback limits. The majority of the existing maritime shrubland vegetation will be left largely undisturbed through selective clearing. The original and revised projects contain similiar techniques to avoid bluff area impacts. The revised plans are consistent with Coastal Erosion Management Regulations pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 505. Freshwater Wetlands Protection of the freshwater wetland systems will be required to minimize disturbance during construction. An Article 24 Freshwater Wetland Permit Application will be filed with the NYSDEC. A Freshwater Permit Application will also be required by the Town of Southold. Each of these agencies will specify general and specific permit conditions that must be adhered to by the applicant. At a minimum, standard practices used to protect wetlands include placement of silt barriers along the limit of any permitted disturbed areas. The southwest area of the north wetland will be excavated to a depth below the elevation of groundwater to provide for additional open water. The added surface water may aid in the reduction the Phragmites which cannot tolerate extended periods of deep water flooding. An area of approximately 0.36 acres adjacent to the exposed groundwater will be graded and planted with wetland vegetation. Typical species could include: Tussock sedge Sweet flag Banker's dwarf Sweet pepperbush Joe Pye weed Swamp rose mallow Highbush blueberry Button bush Carex sticta Acorus calamus Sa/ix x cotteti Clethra a/nifo/ia Eupatoriadelphus maculatus Hibiscus moscheutos Vaccinium corymbosum Cephalanthus occidentalis Vegetation & Wildlife The revised site plan will result in a loss of approximately 42 acres of existing upland vegetation and wildlife habitat areas. The site does not contain known habitats or wildlife that are of special significance and/or are listed under Federal or State Coastal Environmental Corporation 23 I I I I I ! i I I i I I I I I I I I Peconic Landing at Soathold Lifecare ComnmniO, $outholt~ New Fork LEAF Narrative significant protective status. Disturbance to the +/- 25 acres of Successional Fields and Shrublands, and the small patches of Successional Southern Hardwood forests are not expected to significantly impact rare plants or animals since these organisms do not typically occur in highly disturbed areas. The Peconic Landing at Southold revised site plan includes approximately 37.93 acres of Scenic Easements. These areas provide protection for some of the existing vegetation and wildlife habitat areas. The Maritime Oak-Beech forest is a unique, upland terrestrial community. The proposed project site plan revisions are designed to minimize its disturbance. Several rare plant species are known to occur at the upper edges of cobble beaches on Long Island in the vicinity of Greenport; future beach access points developed on-site should be placed in locations that do not support rare plant species. Native soils disturbed during construction will be stockpiled on site for reuse during final grading activities. The forested freshwater wetlands do provide habitat suitable to support populations of small amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. The transition area between the upland terrestrial communities and the aquatic/wetland communities is regarded as an important area for terrestrial and aquatic wildlife. Organisms from both communities use this area for shelter, breeding and feeding. The expansion of freshwater wetlands and open water, the Scenic Easement areas and wetland regulation legislated by Town, State and Federal governments will minimize impacts to the wetland and adjacent upland areas. Constructed wetland areas and enhancement of the existing wetlands will provide an addition of approximately 1.6 acres of open waters and 1.8 acres of freshwater wetlands. Open Space & Land Use Compared to the original plan, the revised plan will increase available open space. The Scenic Easements and constructed wetlands account for +/- 42 acres of open space. The on-site public water supply wall includes a well head protection easement extending as a 200 foot radius from the wall point. The southerly Scenic Easement also reduces impacts to the cultural resources identified with the Brecknock Hall building and its surrounding landscaped grounds. The building's future use as a performing arts center provides a mechanism for its restoration and continued maintenance while providing public access. A compatible cultural benefit and lower impact is expected from the arts center compared to its use as a restaurant and bar. The site's access will be constructed to the west of the existing Brecknock Hall. The existing visual aspects associated along this section of NYS Route 25 will not be significantly altered by the revised project. Coastal Environmental ('orporal~on 24 ! I i I I I I I I 1 i I ! I I I I i Peconic Landing at $outhold Lifecare Community $outhold, New York LEAF Narrative The revised project is consistent with surrounding area land uses, conforms with current zoning. A lifecare community use may also have a lower impact on select community services. For example, the occupants will not have school aged children and there will be no increase in public school populations as a result of the project. The occupants are expected to provide a tax base that would benefit local, public education needs. The extended health care facilities will also lessen the impact on the local area health care facilities. On-site security and emergency response systems will also minimize dependence on community services. The lifecare community is expected to offer an alternative environment for seniors that seek this option. Traffic A preliminary analysis was performed on traffic generated by the revised project. The assessment was performed at the site's proposed ingress/egress onto NYS Route 25. Site generated traffic appears to satisfactorily function with the existing traffic in the immediate vicinity. Potential on-site turning movement delays were nominal. Sight distances ware determined as adequate. The original Breakers project included a traffic study. It concluded that traffic impacts would have a minimal affect on the existing highway network and that sight distances ware acceptable. The traffic impacts generated by the revised project are expected to be equal to or less than the original, approved project. Comments Based on the information available and the assessments conducted to date, the application known as Peconic Landing Lifecare Community, as a revision to the approved site plan, is expected to result in lower environmental impacts than the original plan. The project is consistent with prior Town of Southold recommendations to minimize deveopment impacts generated by use of the parcel, including: Reduced water use, sanitary waste volume, land disturbance, traffic generation, and solid waste generation. Thus at the subject site, a reduction of impacts in these areas would be expected when compared to the impacts generated from the Breakers project. · Development which is compatible with zoning and the surrounding area land use. Coastal Environmental Corporation 25 I I I I I I I I I i 1 i I I I I i Pe¢on~ Lana~g at $outhold Lifecare Community Sour&old, Hew Fork LEAF Narrative · Setbacks needed to protect and preserve habitats (wetlands, bluffs beachfront and Long Island Sound). According to market research conducted for Peconic Landing, as many as 80 percent of the residential units will be occupied by individuals and households who will move to the site from outside the North Fork. The project will take nearly 18 months to complete and is expected to require a workforce, of 300 full-time employees. Once completed Peconic Landing will employ more than 100 full-time employees and an additional 85 part-time employees. The Scenic Easements for approximately 37.93 acres preserves open space, wildlife habitats, and the cultural resources identified with Brecknock Hall are important benefits to the community and can be achieved without public funding. Real property taxes will be imposed on the Peconic Landing property and an increase in the tax base will be realized. Water supply and wastewater disposal requirements of the project are available through the Village of Greenport's municipal systems and can be provided without exceeding existing system limits. Areas adjacent to the Scenic Easements, wetlands and woodlands that may experience disturbance during construction, should be restored with native soils and plant species. Overall planting plans will seek to reduce maintenance requirements (irrigation and chemical treatment) and provide some vegetative species that offer wildlife benefits. Coastal Environmental Corporation 26 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I i Appendix I I I I I I I I I I I I I I- I I I I I 14-16-2 (2/91}--7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent* Iy, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The lull EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site, By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: if any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate}, and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditipned Negative Declaration is only valid ~or Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible ,Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 ! I I PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full E^F will be dependent on information currently available and wi[[ not involve new studies, research or investigation. [f information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. I I I I I I I NAME OF ACTION Peconic Landing at Southold Lifecare Community LOCATION OF ACT]ON (Include Strut Address, Municipality and County) Northside of Main Road(NY25) approx. 1,100ft E/O Sound Rd, NAME DP APPLICANT/SPONSOR ! BUSINESS TFL~PHO~. 30 US Retirement Communities on behalf of Peconic Landing (610~627:2~ ADDRESS 101Chesley Drive CITYIPO STATE Media PA NAME OF OWNER (If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ) ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DEBCRi~[ONOPACTION Application to amend an approved site plan for construction of 118 single family detached cottages;132 apartment units; 24 unit assisted living center;and 32 bed skilled care center with supporting amenities. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: F1Urban [~industria[ ~Commercial r-lResidential (suburban) ~]Rural (non-farm) ~[]Forest []Agriculture ~]Other vacant/old field I 2, Total acreage of project area: 14.4.7708 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION I Meadow or Brushland (Non-agriculturall 74.0 acres 47.9 acres Forested 49.3 acres 32.6 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0.0 acres 0.0 acres I Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 2.8 acres 4.6 acres Water Surface Area (3 , 8 acres ;). 4 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 1 2.4 acres 4.8 acres I Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres 0 24 4 acres Other (Indicate type).Lawns/Landscaping 4.8 acres 28.1 acres I 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Haven & Riverhead Series a. Soil drainage: ~[]Weli drained 85 % of site ~Moderately well drained 1 0 % of site ~Poorly drained 5 % of site I b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? HA acres. {See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~Yes ~iNo i a. What is depth to bedrock~ NA (in feet) 2 ~, Approximate percentage ot proposed prolect s~te with slopes: 7~-l~'lUTe 70 % ~ ~u-~ 1~'115% or greater 5 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? I-IYes DNo unkn w - 19 h century [~a sion 7. Is prolelcC~ s~stant,al~ cbnt,guous to a s,te ~te[J on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I-lYes RqNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-50 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [~Yes []No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DYes 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is as identified threatened or endangered? ~]Yes [~No According to r~R~gw~..- N¥,qh~.~ ;~ NY,qDOS Fil~ Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? [i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ~Yes ~No Describe Bluffs ! ! 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhbod as an open space or recreation area? DYes J~iNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [~Yes I-iNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NA a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary I I I I I I '1 I I I I 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name ~Tvenm~ ~W ~fl~n~ C,P-11/LI Sound b. Size (In acres) 3,6 acres 17.' Is the site served by existing public utilities? [~Yes [-1No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~]Yes ~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? I-IYes fqNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? I~Yes [~o 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Articte of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I-lyes B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 144.7'7{~R acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 144. 7708 acres initially; 144. 7708 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: t~ (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NA %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 2 ; proposed 5 ~ ~' g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1 ?~ (upon completion of proiect)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family _~_ Two Family Multiple Family Initially/ 250 Ultin~ately 75f1 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35 j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 1 r~flf~ Condominium .. he ght;2,..Q.~.,_~ width; _~965 length. ft. I I I I I I I I Z. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, e~c.J wall be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? [~Yes I~No []N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? ~t'~rmwater Manaqement b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~2Yes [-1No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? lC]Yes []No 42.8 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? : - , · acres. 5. Will any mature forest (~,.va~:F,~l~gfe~i~ or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? [~Yes I-1No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [Yes 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction '~1~) 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 1 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? 18 Cnumber). months, (including demolition). month year, (including demolition). month year. []Yes f'lNo ; after project is complete 100 full . time 85 part time [Yes :~2]No If yes, explain I I I I I I I I I I 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes r~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? lC]Yes [3No Type Sanitary 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ]lC]Yes I-INo Explain water ~urface increases from 0.8 to 2.4 acres 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? j~]Yes ~'lNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? K'lYes r-INo a. If yes, what is the amount per month {~ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~3Yes []No c. If yes, give name $outhold Transfer Station; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~]Yes e. If Yes, explainRecyclable materials: glass, Cutchogue metal, pare,plastics [No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? I-lyes ~]No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~[Yes I~No Routine care of lng 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? f-lYes [~o 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? []Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~Yes [No If yes, indicate type{s) Electric & fossil fuels 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 64 ~ 000 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~Yes [~No If Yes, explain landscap- 4 I ! l ! l I l I 25. Approvals required City. Town, ~ Board []Yes EI(~; Town, ~a:~e Planning Board [~Yes I-1No ~, Town Zonir)g Board I~Yes ~No ~, County Health Department [~Yes I-INo Other Local AgenciesSouthold [~Yes r~No Trustees Other Regional Agencies I~Yes F'lNo State Agencies NYSDEC & NYSDOT [~Yes []No Federal Agencies VIYes Type Date water & wastewater wetland permit wetland & roadway access 9:97 9-97 Pending Pending C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? YE]Yes [3No If Yes, indicate decision required: revised [:]zoning amendment F'lzoning variance F-Ispecia[ use permit I-Isubdivision [~site plan Clnew/revision of master plan I~resource management plan [3other 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? HD-Hamlet Density/ LB T.imited Business 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 350 condominium units m m i 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? None 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? NA 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~EYes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? Residential and Golf Course I-INn 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/~ mile? []):Yes [3No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA I a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I-lYes []No m11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ~Yes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I~Yes I-1No m. . 12. Will the prop(~sed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? K1Yes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? F'lYes ClNo m D. Informational Details Attached LEAF Narrative, Sept. 1997 Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project, if there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or mavoid them. E. Verification I I certify that the information orovided above is true to the best of ro~ knowJe, clge. . A~,~fh~ EnvNiar~.ental Consultant Ior [ne appm~can~. · ~ ~/e/jeff~ey T.. Seeman~,-CEJP- - Date. 9-13-97 · Signature ~ ~"~//~,~J~---"'--~ Title President r Coasta. 1 Environ. Corp I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information {Read Carefully} · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2} does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · T~e ,mpacts of each proiect, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · tn identifying impacts, consider tong term, short term and cumlative effects. I~t~uctt~ (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. A~lybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? r~NO [DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,0OO or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? Ci.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)l-INO [DYES · Specific land forms: 6 I 2 3 Small to. Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact impact Project Change [] [] I-lYes I'-]No [] [] []Yes ~'-[ No [] [] I-lYes I-1No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ~-']Yes E~No I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IMPACT ON WATER 3~ Will proposed action affect any water body desisnated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) I-JNO F"IYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? I-INO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or mote than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed {project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of Water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? I-INO r-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] r-]yes []No D [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes ~--~No [] [] []Yes r-iNo [] [] []Yes 1'3No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] DYes r"lNo [] [] DYes •No [] [] I-lYes I--[No [] [] []Yes •No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] r-lYes []No [] [] []Yes [] [] []Yes •No [] [] DYes []No EEl [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes •'No [] [] []Yes I-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '1 I I I · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. will proposed action affect air quality~ I-INO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicJe trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land commi~ed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? I-INO nYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than ~vice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9 Wilt Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or nomendangered species~ I-1NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources.~ r~NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) I 2 .3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact · Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] /--lYes []No [] [] I/Yes [--INo [] [] I--~Yes []NO [] [] ('-lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I'-INo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ~Yes []No I I I I I I · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems {e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures Ce.g. cause a farm field to drain poorty due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: i IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~INO E~YES {If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix I Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether I man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their I enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project componentS that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. i · Other impacts: I I I IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? I-1NO nyES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action witt occur in an area designated as sensitive for I archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: I I I I IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will'Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 C]NO F'WES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community: · Other impacts: 9 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated Ey Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I'-~ Yes L-'] No [] [] ~-]Yes ['-I No [] [] I-'~Yes E~No [] [] I-'lYes F"INo [] [] C'lYes [] [] ~Yes r-INo [] [] E]Yes reno [] E] E]Yes r-INo [] [] nyes E]No [] [] DYes r-INo [] [] r-lyes r"lNo [] [] E]Yes F']No [] [] I-lYes nNo [] [] E]Yes E]No [] [] E]Yes E]No I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14 WiJ] there be an effect to existing transportation systems? F~NO -IYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action wile result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of rue[ or energy supply? Exan~ples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of . any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than $0 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? []NO D-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? F'INO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances Ci.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the.excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: 10 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact Impact Project Change [] [] I']Yes ['-~ No [] [] []Yes ~}No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes EgNo [] [] []Yes []No '[] [] []Yes []No r-I [] []Yes [DNo [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I--[Yes []No [] [] []Yes []NO [] [] []Yes •NO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community;~ []NO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the proiect is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services wiJ] increase by more than $% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ~]Yes [~No [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] I~Yes I-'1 No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [-'~ Yes []No [] [] r'3 Yes []No ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~No ~ ~ DY~ ~No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? r-INO f-WES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if al~plicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact bY project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 I I Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum I I I I I I I I I I I I- I I I I This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question ll of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · ^ parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overtook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · ^ site or structure listed on the i"lational or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest' Preserve? · l'tational Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · Hationai Hatural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · l'tationai Park Service lands? · Rivers designated as Hational or State Wi]d, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter.county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? · County road? · State? · Local road? Project and Resource (in .Miles) 0-1/4 1/4 -I/2 I/2.3 .3.5 5+ Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) F-lYes E]No Are any of the resources checked in question ! used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? r-lYes ClHo I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I u~'b~.KIPi~OPl OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question I, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within '1/4 mile * 1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [~ Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] arban [] [] River, Lake, Pond J'-] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] h~ountainous [] [] Other [] [] HOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: '1/2 mile [~] Yes []rio *! miles []Yes '2 miles J']Yes []rio *3 miles [~] Yes []No Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is I~IOTE: When user data is unavailable o~ unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At worksite [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [] [] I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix -2- CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3272 TIERNEY PLACE BRONX, NEW YORK 10465 (718) 792-1932 FAX (718) 792-2271 I Augl/St 12, 1997 I I I I Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Young a Young Planning, Engineering & Land Surveying 400 0strander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 PECONIC LANDIN~ LIFE CAR~ CO~4I~-ITY at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Wolpert: As per our scope of work for the referenced project, the following are the results of ENSIGN ENGINEERING, P.C. efforts. I I I I I I I I Obtain cu£ze~t, existing traffic volume data from~,~4cipal agencies The existing traffic was determined from site counts, previous studies in the vicinity, and checked with average annual daily traffic volumes available through Suffolk County. These peak hour volumes are attached. Forecast the traffic volumes which the site would be a~ticitmted to produce The site generated traffic was determined using standard methods developed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) ~ Generation. 5th Edition. and Trip Generation. February_ 1995 Update to the 5th Edition. The residential land uses that were employed for this study included: Elderly Housing, Detached Retirement Co~LaLLunity Congregate Care Center 118 units 156 units 32 units The results of the trip generation analysis is attached depicting peak hour traffic volumes entering and exiting the facility. I I I PECONIC LANDING LIFE CARE CO~]NITY at Greenport, T/0 Southold, New York (97-0290) Page 2 Analyze the distribution of traffic from the site onto the adjacent roadway The trip generated traffic was distributed to the local street I based on the existing traffic 55%/45%. split, namely * Perform capacity analysis (AM and PM peak hour) at the site I ingress/egress I I I I I I I I I I Capacity analyses were performed on the site generated traffic at the ingress/egress onto Route 25 (Main Street) for AM and PM peak hours, assuming a stop sign controlled approach from the site. These analyses yielded Levels of Service (LOS) "A" for the intersection at both peak hours. The left turn movement from the site exhibited a slightly higher LOS - "C", indicating that there may be some on site delay due to the required gap time necessary to negotiate that turning movement. Prepare a traffic assessment statement based on the above analyses Based on the analyses performed, the proposed Peconlc Life Care C~,-,,~-~ty development appears to satisfactorily function with the existing traffic in the immediate vicinity. The potential on-site turning movement delays are nominal, yet could be alleviated with a semi-actuated traffic signal at the site ingress/egress. This solution may or may not be amenable to the Town of Southold or to the owner. Further analysis may be required to determine if the intersection warrants a signal. The sight distance from the site access is adequate with the proper clearing. Please let me know if you have any questions on the material presented. As always, ENSIGN ENGINEERING, P.C. appreciates the opportunity of working with you. Very truly yours, ~NSIGN ENGINEERING, P.C. President I enc. I I I I I I I I I I I I PECONIC LANDING SUMMARY OF AVERAGE VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION AVERAGE WEEKDAY DRIVEWAY VOLUMES AUGUST 1997 I LAND USE SIZE AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT i i I ELDERLY HOUSING, DETACHED 118 DWELLING UNITS RETIREMENT COMMUNITY 156 OCCUPIED UNITS CONGREGATE CARE CTK. 32 OCCUPIED UNITS 30 23 70 43 12 15 24 19 1 i 3 2 TOTAL 43 39 97 64 I I I I I i I I I I Note: A zero rate indicates no rate data available TRIP GENEP~ATION BY MICROTR~%NS Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c HCS: Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) SITE ACCESS (E-W) SOUND AVENUE Major Street Direction .... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... RGM Date of Analysis .......... 8/11/97 Other Information ......... AM PEAK WITH SITE GENEP, ATED TRAFFIC Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's I I I i I I i ! I ! Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 0 N 24 384 .9 .9 0 1.10 Westbound L T R 0 1 < 0 N 320 19 .9 .9 0 Northbound L 0 Southbound T R L T R 0 1 21 .9 0 1.10 1.10 0 0 1 .9 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left ~h/rn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 I I I I I I ! I I I i I i I i I I I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 366 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 903 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 903 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.97 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 377 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1134 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1134 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.97 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.96 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 820 355 0.96 0.96 0.96 342 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) SB L 22 342 11.2 0.1 C 7.4 SB R 25 903 4.1 0.0 A EB L 30 1134 3.3 0.0 A 0.2 Intersection Delay = 0.5 sec/veh I I I ! HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Well Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) SITE ACCESS AMSITE.HC0 Page i Major Street Direction .... EW (E-W) SOUND AVENUE Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) iAnalyst RGM Date of Analysis .......... 8/11/97 Other Information ......... PM PEAK WITH SITE GENEP, ATED TRAFFIC I Two -way Stop-controlled Intersection I No. Lanes Stop/Yield I Volumes Grade I MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 0 N 53 422 .9 .9 0 Westbound L T R 0 1 < 0 N 352 44 .9 .9 0 Northbound L T 0 0 Southbound R L T R 0 1 0 1 29 35 .9 .9 0 PCE's 1.10 1.10 1.10 Adjustment Factors iVehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 I Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 ,! I i I I I I i I i I I I I I I I I ! HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c AMSITE.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 416 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 852 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 852 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.95 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 440 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1058 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1058 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.94 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.92 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 944 301 0.92 0.92 0.92 275 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) SB L 35 275 15.0 0.4 C 9.2 SB R 43 852 4.4 0.0 A EB L 65 1058 3.6 0.1 A 0.4 Intersection Delay = 0.8 sec/veh I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i Appendix -3- Faxed 8/21/97, United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 3817 Luker Road Cortland, New York 13045 August 20, 1997 I I I Mr. Jeffrey L. Seeman, CEP/REM/QEP President Coastal Environmental Corporation 263 Lakeview Avenue, P.O. Box 602 Brightwaters, NY 11718 Dear Mr. Seeman: This responds to your letters of July 27 and August 6, 1997, requesting information on the presence of endangered or threatened spec/es in the vicinity of: I I I I I I I i I I 1. The Gatz Farm at Northville, Town of Riverhead, Suffolk County, New York, and, . . 2. The Peconic Landing/BreCknock Hall in the City'Of Greenport, Town 6f Southold; Suffolk. County;:. NewlyOrk~,':: :: -:: '.: :'-:' ~ -.: "~ · The infomtion will be used in the preparation of Environmental Assessments. Except for occasional transient individuals, no Federally list~l or:i~oPOsed endangered or threatened species under our jurisdiction are known to exist in the project impact area. Therefore, no Biological Assessment or further Section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is required with the U.S. Fish and Wild!ifc Service (Service). Should project plans change, or if additional information on listed or proposed species becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. A compilation of Federally listed and proposed endangered and threatened species in New York is enclosed for your information. The above comments pertaining to enda-gered species under our jurisdiction are provided pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, This response does not preclude additional Service comments under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act or other legislation. The National Wetlands Inventory (NWl) maps of the Riverhead, Greenport, and Orient Quadrangles are available and may show wetlands in the project vicinity. However, while the NWI maps are reasonably accurate, they should not be used in lieu of field surveys for determining the presence of wetlands or delineating wetland boundaries for Federal regulatory purposes. Work in certain waters and wetlands of the United States may require a permit from the U,S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). tf a permit is required, in reviewing the application pursuant to the Fish and Wildlife Coordination ACt, the Service may concur, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I with or without stipulations, or recommend denial of the permit depending upon the potential adverse impacts on fish and wildlife resources associated with project implementation. The need for a Corps pen'nit may be determined by contacting Mr. Joseph Seebode, Chief, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278 (telephone: [212] 264-3996). If you require additional information please contact Michael Stoll at (607) 753-9334. Sincerely, ~-o~ Sherry W. Morgan Field Supervisor Enclosure CC: NYSDEC, Stony Brook, NY (Env. Permits) NYSDEC, Latham, NY COE, New York, NY 2 I FEDERALLY LISTED AND PROPOSED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES IN NEW YORK I FISHES Sturgeon, shormose* Acipenser brevirostrum E Turtle, bog Clernmys muhlenbergii PT Status Distributi0i~ Turtle, green* Chelonia mydas T I Turtle, hawksbill* Eretmochelys imbricata E Turtle, leatherback* Dermochelys coriacea E ! Turtle, loggerhead* Caretta caretta T I Turtle, Atlantic Lepidochelys kempii E ridley* Hudson River & other Atlantic coastal rivers Albany, Columbia, Dutchess, Genesee, Orange, Oswego, Putnam, Seneca, Ulster, Wayne, and Westchester Counties Oceanic summer visitor coastal waters Oceanic summer visitor coastal waters Oceanic summer resident coastal waters Oceanic summer resident coastal waters Oceanic summer resident coastal waters BIRDS Eagle, bald Haliaeetus leucocephalus T Falcon, peregrine Falco peregrinus E I Plover, piping i Tern, roseate I Bat, Indiana Cougar, eastern Whale, blue* Whale, finback* I Whale, humpback* Whale, right* Whale, sei* I Whale, sperm* Sna'tl, Chittenan~o I ovate amber Mussel, dwarf wedge I Charadrius melodus Sterna dougallii dougallii E T E Entire state Entire state - re-establishment to former breeding range in progress . . Great Lakes Watersnea Remainder of coastal New York Southeastern coastal portions of state Myotis sodalis Felis concolor couguar Balaenoptera musculus Balaenoptera physalus Megaptera novaeangliae Eubalaena glacialis Balaenoptera borealis Physeter catodon E Entire state E Entire state - probably extinct E Oceanic E Oceanic E Oceanic E Oceanic E Oceanic E Oceanic Succinea chittenangoensis T Madison County Alasmidonta heterodon E Orange County - lower Neversink River * Except for sea turtle nesting habitat, prineipal responsibility for these species is vested with the National Marine Fisheries Service. I ! Region 5 - 01/30/97 - 2 pp. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FEDERALLY LISTED AND PROPOSED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES IN NEW YORK (Cont'd) Scientific Name ~tatus Distribution Butterfly, Karner blue Lycaeides melissa samuelis E Albany, Saratoga, Warren, and Schenectady Counties PLANTS Monkshood, northern wild Pogonia, sma:l. 1 whorled Swamp pink Gerardia, sandplain Fern, American hart's-tongue Orchid, eastern prairie fringed Bulrush, northeastern Roseroot, Leedy's Amaranth, scabeach Goldenrod, Houghton's Aconitum noveboracense Isotria medeoloides Helonias bullata Agalinis acuta Asplenium s. colopendrium Var. amelTcana Platanthera leucophea Scirpus ancistrochaetus Sedum integrifolium ssp. Leedyi Amaranthus pumilus Solidago houghtonii T T T E T T E T T T Ulster, Sullivan, and Delaware Counties Entire state Staten Island - presumed extirpated Nassau and Suffolk Counties Onondaga and Madison Counties Not relocated in New York Not relocated in New York West shore of Seneca Lake Atlantic coastal plain beaches Genesee County E -- endangered T = threatened P = proposed 2 .Region 5 - 01/30/97 - 2 pp. I I I Coastal Environmental Corporation 263 Lakeview Avenue West FO Box 602 Brightwaters, New York 11718 (516) 666 382~ fax (516) 665 1~35 e-mail jlscoast~AOL.com environmental plarrning & permits I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I August 6, 1997 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Endangered Species Unit Wildlife Resources Center Delmar, NY 12054 Significant Habitat - Presence of Endangered or Threatened Species Peconic Landing/Brecknock Hall, G-reenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York Dear Sir: The owners of the above referenced property are proposing the development ofa lifecare community on +/- 147 acres of land. Coastal Environmental is preparing the environmental assessment for the proposed development. We are requesting information from your file on the presence of rare, threatened or endangered species and significant habitats within the project area. A list of other knowledgeable contacts or information would be helpful. To aid in your file search we have enclosed a location map. Thank you for your cooperation. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Very truly yours, Jeffi'ey L. Seeman, CEP/REMJ QEP President I I I Coastal Environmental Corporation 263 Lakeview Avenue West PO Box 602 Brightwaters, New York 11718 (516) 666 3825 fax (~16) 665 1538 e=mail jlscoast(.~AOL.com environmental planning & permits wetlands impact I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I August 6, 1997 Mr~ G-reg Capobianco New York State Department of State Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfi.om Revitalization 162 Washington Avenue Albany, NY 12231 RE: Significant Habitat - Coastal Management Program Peconic Landing/Brecknoek Hall, Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York Dear Sir: The owners of the above referenced property are propos'mg the development of a lifeeare community on +/- 147 acres of land. Coastal Environmental is preparing the environmental assessment for the proposed development. We are requesting information fi.om your file on the presence of rare, threatened or endangered species and significant hab'atats within the project area. A list of other knowledgeable contacts or information would be helpful. To aid in your file search we have enclosed a location map. Thank you for your cooperation. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Very truly yours, Jeffrey L. Seeman, CEP/REM/QEP President I I I I Coastal Environmental Corporation 263 Lakeview Avenue West PO Box 602 Brlghtwaters, New York 11718 (516) 666 3825 fax (516) 665 1538 e-mail jlscoast~AOL.com environmental planning & permits waste ~-=.l~oen~nt regulatory comp~nce Board Ce~fie. d Em~otm~,gtd Professionals I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I July 27, 1997 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Wildlife Resource Center 700 Troy-Schenectady Road Latham, NY 12110-2400 Significant Habitat - Presence of Endangered or Threatened Species Peconic Landing/Brecknock Hall, greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York Dear Sir: The owners of the above referenced property are proposing the development ofa lifecare community on +/- 147 acres of land Coastal Environmental is preparing the environmental assessment for the proposed development. We are requesting information from your file on the presence of rare, threatened or endangered species and significant habitats within the project area. A list of other knowledgeable contacts or information would be helpful. To aid in your file search we have enclosed a location map. Thank you for your cooperation, Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Very truly yours, Jeffrey L. Seeman, CEP/REM/QEP Presidem I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Wildlife Resources Center 700 Troy-Schenectady Road Latham, New York 12110-2400 (518) 783.-3932 August 26, 1997 Jeffrey L. Seeman Coastal Environmental Corp. 263 Lakeview Ave. West, PO Box 602 Brightwaters, NY 11718 Dear Mr. Seeman: John P. CahiH Commissioner We have reviewed the New York Natural Heritage Program files with respect to your recent request for biological information concerning the proposed 147 acre Lifecare Community Development, site as indicated on your enclosed map, located in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York State. Enclosed is a computer printout coveting the area you requested to be reviewed by our staff The information contained in this report is considered sensitive and may not be released to the public without permission from the New York Natural Heritage Program. Our files are continually growing as new habitats and occurrences of rare species and communities are discovered. In most cases, site-specific or comprehensive surveys for plant and animal occurrences have not been conducted. For these reasons, we can only provide data which have been assembled from our files. We cannot provide a definitive statement on the presence or absence of species, habitats or natural communities. This information should not be substituted for on-site surveys that may be required for environmental assessment. This response applies only to known occurrences of rare animals and/or significant wildlife habitats. You should contact our regional office, Division of Regulatory Affairs, at the address enclosed for information regarding any regulated areas or permits that may be required (e.g., regulated Wetlands) under State Law. If this proposed project is still active one year from now we recommend that you contact us again so that we may update this response. Sincerely, Deborah L. Albert Information Services NY Natural Heritage Program Encs. Reg. 1, Wildlife Mgr. I' USERS GUI~E TO I~F NATURAL ~=I~.R1TAGE DATi on thc ~ p ~ ~d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~t ~ ~u~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~d ~ DATA~EN~HI~: ~~m~~~d~u~m~fi~. ~c~for~r~ ~S 7 ~'~C~ ~ ~,~ S~ ~ ~(~ 1~ ~ -U~ B~-N~ . 17.11. ~ ~ ~h~ ~ f~at ~ ~,~ ~ ~ at ~ ~w~l~. 2) f~ 1,~ ~ I 3) ~f~4U~.O~.7 ~~ 4) ~~U~.~~,~m~~of~R~uh~ 17.11. I) 6~f~~ ~) 1~ ~ f~3~~ NEW YORK STATE ~TATUS (communifi~):At Jhls ~ ~ a~ no catego6~ ~ f~w~mmmun~ti=~ con6nucdoom:x'tp~g¢ I I REGION COUNTIES Region 1 Nassau I Suffolk I Region 2 New York City ! i Region 3 Dutchess Orange Putnam I Rockland~ Sullivan Ulster, Westchester i Region 4 I I I I I I I I I I I NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS REGIONAL OFFICES NAME Robert Greene Permit Administrator George Danskin Permit Administrator Margaret Duke Permit Administrator ADDRESS AND PHONE NO. Loop Road, Bldg. 40 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 (516) 444-0365 Hunters Point Plaza 4740 21st Street Long Island City, NY 11101-5407 (718) 482-4997 21 South Putt Comers Road New Paltz, NY 12561-1696 (914) 256-3059 Albany W'flliam J. Clarke Columbia Permit Administrator Delaware Greene, Montgomery, Otsego Rensselaer, Schenectady, Schoharie 1150 N. Westeott Road Schenectady, NY 12306-2014 (518) 357-2234 Region 5 Region 6 Region 7 Region 8 Region 9 C/mton Richard Wild Essex Permit Administrator .Franklin Fulton, Hamilton Saratoga, Warren, Washington Koute 86 Ray Brook, NY 12977 (518) 897-1234 Herkimer Rendy Vaas Jefferson Permit Administrator Lewis Oneida, St. Lawrence State Offiee Building 317 Washington Street Watertown, NY 13601 (315) 785-2246 Broome Ralph Manna, Jr. Cayuga Permit Administrator Chenango Cortland, Madison, Onondaga Oswego, Tioga, Tompkins 615 Erie Blvck West Syracuse, NY. ~ 3204-2400 (315) 426-7439 Chemung Albert Butkas Genesee Permit Administrator Livingston Monroe, Ontario, Orleans Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben Wayne, Yates 6274 East Avon-Lima Road Avon, NY 14414 (716) 226-2466 Allegany Steven Doleaki Cattnraugus Permit Administxator Chautauqua Erie, Niagara, Wyoming 270 Michigan Avenue Buffalo, NY 14203-2999 (716) 851-7165 George E. Pataki August 25, 1997 Mr. ~effrey Seeman Coastal Ellvironmental Corporation 263 Lakeview Avenue West ~ Box 602 Brightwaters, NY 11718 Dear Mr. Seeman: Per your request, enclosed 'the Signff cant, nan ative and maps for area~ t site. The lreas any designated habitat area. some haelq Xoum 2oastal Fisl and~ 1, please do~ t't he~ Sincerely, Gregory ~. Capobi~mco Per your request, enclosed please find a copy of the Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat narrative and maps for areas closest to your project site. The areas outlined on your map is not within I have also enclosed some haekground materials on the New York State Coastal Management Program and the Significant Coastal Fish and WiJdlif¢ Habitat desingations. Should you have any questions mgardiag this material, please don't hesitate to call me at (518) 474-6000. I Coastal Resources Specialist I Enclosures 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I George E. Pataki Governor Alexander F. Treadwell Secretary of State Fact Sheet on New York State's Significant Coastal Fish and Vfddlife ~ah~tats p~m_ ose of the gi_~rnificant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats Pro.am Many habitats that are vital to the survival of New York's coastal fish and wildlife resources exist along our state's 3,200 miles of shore. However, as development pressures mount, these habitats are being degraded or lost. In response to public concern about accelerating habitat destruction, a policy aimed at protecting our most important coastal habitats was established in the New York State Waterfront Revitalization and Coastal Resources Act of 1981. The New York Department of State admini.~ter$ this law and is committed to habitat protection so as to preserve the recreational, commercial and ecological benefits derived from our coastal fish and wildlife resources. Criteria Used to Screen and Identify_ The Most $i_enificant Coastal Habitats A habitat is significant if it serves one or more of the following functions: (a) is essential to the survival of a large portion of a particular fish or wildlife population; Co) supports populations of species which are endangered, threatened or of special concern; (c) supports populations having significant commercial, recreational, or educational value; and (d) exemplifies a habitat type which is not commonly found in the state or in a coastal region. Also, the significance of certain habitats increases to the extent they could not be replaced if destroyed. Identification of SLtrnificant Hahitets Using the criteria listed above, biologists in the Deparanent of Environment~l Conservation developed a quantitative system for evalv~-ing each candidate habitat. This tool lesse~$ subjectivity in the evaluation process. Habitats which receive a score above a specific threshold value are then recommended by the Department of Environmental Conservation for designation by the Secretary of State as significant coastal fish and wildlife habitats. Each habitat is then mapped and described in a habitat narrative. Public review of recommeaded sites begins when the Department of State distributes information packets for each habitat to local officials and concerned citizens at regional information meetings. This packet includes showing the proposed habitat boundary and a habitat nassailve de~cn'bing the habitat, the commqllity of fish and wildlife that use the habitat, ami the kinds of activities that could de~'oy the habRat. We expect to receive valuable local information during the public review process; this information will be used to verify and add specificity to the information that had been compiled for each habitat. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Formal Public Review and Designation The Secretary of State will send copies of reviewed habitat narratives and maps to appropriate municipal clerk offices, and post legal notification announcing the schedule of public hearings. These hearings will be held to receive final comment on whether these habitat areas merit designation. Ax3gr reviewing the hearing record, the Secretary of State will decide, in consultation with the Deparunent of Environmental Conservation, whether to designate candidate habitats. Once desiKn~t~, the significant habitats will be drawn on the Coastal Area Map and filed with respective county and municipal clerks offices. protection of Designated Habi~ars The federal Coastal Zone Management Act and the State Waterfront Revitalization and Coastal Resources Act authorize the Department of Sta~ as the Coastal l~nnnLr~t Agency W concur with or object to f~deral and State actions affecting the coast. The Dapartment will use the information provided for each designated habitat in this consistency review process and as a result will disapprove proposed actions that would significantly alter or destroy a dasignan:d habitat. In addition, commnnities that prepare Local Waterfront RevitaliTmlon Programs as part of the State Coastal Management Program, are required to protect designated significant habitats and are encouraged to use local land use controls for habitat protection. Finally, State agencies regulating those activities that require an environmental impact statement will ensure that significent habitats will be protected from harm from such activities. D~¥elopment and Significant Coastal Habit. ts Although the fundamental purpose of the Significant Coastal Habitats Program is to preserve the viability of designated habitats, there is no prior assumption that development will harm a habitat and should therefore be prohibited. Proposed development actions will be reviewed on a case by case basis with respect to the critical parameters of each potentially affected habitat. If this action will not significantly harm the habitat then it may be appwvable. When hab'uat impairment seems likely, Department of State staff will recommend measures that would mitigate likely impacts. Only those actions with unavoidable adverse habitat impacts would not be approved. Benefits of the Si._~nifieant (7~astal Habitats Prom One of the principal benefi~ of the Significant Coastal Habitats Program is knowin the location of these habitats. Applicam~ can simply refer to the Coastal Area Map to determine whather their proposed action is located in or near a significant habitat. Costly delays created when habitats are discovered later in the project development procees can be avoided. The habita~ map and narrative will serve regulators by providing site specific information useful for impact assessment, l:~h ~vative lists knowledgeable contacts who can assist in identif!hng mitigative techniques that when used, may allow the project to go forth without sacrificing thc habitat. The Significant Habitats Program will also se~e the general public in that it will enable ns to use and develop our coastal land and water resourcea without destroying our most vulnerable and valuable habitats, 3/30/92 I I I I I COASTAL FISH & k'ILDLIFE HABITAT RATING FORM Name of Area: Conkling Point County(les): Suffolk Town (s): Southold 7.5' Quadrangle(s): Greenport, NY; Southold. N~ F~. J ~ 1987 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (IS) Individual Score Replace- ability (ISxR) Final Score RARITY (ER): 9 x 1.0 = 9.0 Relatively small, undeveloped, sand spit and marsh, rare on north fork of Long Island. SPECIES ~LV~NERABILIT~ (SV): Least term (E) and piping plover (T) nesting, additive division: 36 + 25/2 = 4g.5. 48.5 X 1.0 = 48.5 am.m us~ (au): No significm~t fish or wildlife related human uses of the area. 0 X 1.0 = 0.0 POPULATION LEVEL (PL): 4.0 x 1.0 = 4.0 O~e of the ~wo largest concentrations of nesting least tezns on the north fork in 1983 and 1984, of county-level significance. REFLACEABILITY (R): 1.0 Uncertain of ability to replace. SZ~N~FYCANCA = [(E~xa) + (SVxA) + (auxa) + = 61.5 I i ! I i I I I I I ! I i I i I I I I ***SiGNiFICANT COASTAL FISH A~ WILDLIFE HABITAT*** PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONKLING POIS~ LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT: Conk!ing Point is located approximately two miles southwest of the Village of Greenport, on Shelter Island Sound, in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County (7.5' Quadrangles: Greenport, N.Y.; and Southold, N.Y.). The fish and wildlife habitat is approximately 25 acres in size, consisting of a narrow, sparsely vegetated, sand peninsula, a small protected bay, salt marsh, and tidal flats. Conkling Point is generally undeveloped and privately owned. However, the area is bordered by high density residential development to the north, resulting in some recreational disturbance of the habitat. FISH AND WILDLIFE VALUES: Conkling Point is a relatively small coastal wetland area, similar in nature to many other points around the Peconic Bays shoreline, but important as a habitat for wildlife. This area has served for many years as a nesting site for least terns (E) and piping plovers (T), with both species present in 1983, 1984 and 1985. In 1985 an estimated 25 pairs of least terns and 2 pairs of piping plover were observed nesting in the area. In 1984, approximately 100 pairs of least terns and 5 pairs of piping plovers nested in the area. Approximately 45 pairs of least terns and 6 pairs of piping plovers were present in 1983. The concentrations of terns nesting at Conkling Point were the second largest and largest on the north fork of Long Island in 1983 and 1984, respectively. Overall, the population levels of least terns and piping plovers were unusual in Suffolk County. The tidal wetlands at Conkling Point serve as feeding areas for the least terns and many other wildlife species. There are no significant human use activities associated with the wildlife resources of this area. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: Nesting shorebird species inhabiting undeveloped sand beaches of Long Island are highly vulnerable to disturbance by humans from mid-April through July. Significant pedestrian traffic or recreational vehicle use of the Conkling Point peninsula could easily eliminate the tern and plover populations, and should be minimized. Fencing and/or annual posting of the area should be provided to help protect the nesting bird species. Unregulated dredge spoil disposal in this area would be detrimental, but such activities may be designed to maintain or improve the habitat, by setting back vegetative succession. Loss of the salt marsh habitat, through excavation or filling, would reduce its value as i I I i I I I ! I I I I I I ! I I a food producing area for many wildlife species, introduction or attraction of mammalian predators to the area would also be detrimental to the populations of nesting birds. KNOWLEDGEABLE CONTACTS: Tom Hart or Andrew Milliken N.Y.S. Department of State Division of Coastal Resources Waterfront Revitalization 162 Washington Avenue Albany, N~ 12231 Phone: (518) 474-3642 Harry Knoch, Wildlife Manager NYSDEC - Region 1 State University of New York, Building 40 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Phone: (516)751-7900 Louise Harrison Suffolk County Department of Health S~rvices Bureau of Environmental Management County Center Riverhead, NY 11901 Phone: (516) 548-3064 Dave MacLean, Staff Biologist Seatuck Research Program Cornell University Laboratory of Ornithology P.O. Box 31 Islip, NY 11751 Phone: (516) 581-6908 NYSDEC - Significant Habitat Unit Wildlife.Resources Center Delmar, NY 12054 Phone: (518)439-7486 ...///'~/ ' Derit~E m5 I Harbor Shelter ,Cl,~b Island .. · .'~:_, ,. We~t Neck "" ~ ~ " · .. I ' ~ A.ea N~me: Conklin~ Point Pase 2 o· 2 Crab ~ Pt I I I' I 1 I I i I I I I I I I i I I COASTAL FISH & ~T/LDLIFE HABITAT RATING F0~ N=m,~ of Area: Long Beach Bay County(ins): Suffolk Town(s): Southold 7,5' Quadran$1e(s): Orient, H-CT (IS) Individual Score (~) Replaoe- ability Fiual Score BC.,Ob~.',"~'~ PARITY (ER): 64 x 1.2 = 76.8 Large undisturbed coastal wetland and beach ecosystem, rare in New ==Y6z4c State. S~ECIES ~.~EEABILIT~ (SV) .', 33 x 1.2 = 39.6 Osprey (T) and d~.m~ndbac.3~ terrapin (SC); additive division: 2~ + 16/2 = 33. USE (Pm): 27 x 1.2 Commercial shellfiahing area of significance in the northeast region of the United States. Various fish and wildlife recreational activities including c/=-~ing are impor'can~ to Suffolk County residents; additive division: 25 + 4/2 = 27. = 32.4 POPULATION LEvmL (FL): 25 x 1.2 30.0 N,,~her of nesting osprey is unusual in the State. Concentrations of scallops unusual in northeastern United States. REPLACEA~ILIT~ (R): 1.2 Irreplaceable SIGNIFICANCE = [(ERxR) + (~VxR) + (HUxR) + (PLxE)] = 178.8 ,/ i I i I i I i I I i I I I I I I I I ***SIGNIFICANT COASTAL FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT*** PROJECT DESCRIPTION LONG BEACH BAY LOCATION AI~ DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT: Long Beach Hay is located on the northeastern fork of Long Island, one mile east of the hamlet of Orient, in the Town of Southo!d, Suffolk County (7.5' Quadrangle: Orient, N.Y.-Conn.). This approximately 1,300 acre habitat includes Long Beach Bay the adjacent tidal salt marsh areas, and Orient Beach State Park, which is comprised of a long, narrow, sand peninsula protecting the bay area. Most of the open water area of Long Beach Bay is less than 6 feet deep at mean low water. FISH A~D WILDLIFE VALUES: Long Beach Bay and Orient Point Marshes comprise a large and relatively undisturbed coastal estuarine ecosystem. Areas such as this are rare in New York State, and provide habitat for a diversi~y of fish and wildlife species. In 1984, approximately 15 pair of osprey (T) were reported nesting in the Long Beach Bay area. This is one of the largest nesting concentrations of osprey in New York, and the potential exists for additional nesting pairs at this site. Almost all of the nests are located on man-mmde platforms placed around the perimeter of the bay. A variety of seabirds, shorebirds, and wading birds use this area for feeding or for stopovers during migration. This area is especially significant as a feeding area for herons, egrets, and ibis which nest on Plum Island. Long Beach Bay is also an important waterfowl wintering area in Suffolk County. Aerial surveys of waterfowl abundance in January for the ten year period 1~75-1984 indicate average concentrations of over 300 birds in the bay each year, including approxiwately 240 scaup (900 in peak year), and 70 black ducks (300 in peak year), along with lesser numbers of mergansers, bufflehead, goldeneye, and mallard. Diamondback terrapin (SC) are frequently observed in the marsh. Fish and wildlife recreational activities in the area important to the residents of Suffolk County include waterfowl hunting, fishing, and birdwatching. Bay scallops are abundant in Long Beach Bay, contributing to a commercial shellfishery of significance in the northeastern United States. Also, the bay is one of the top three areas for clams in the Town of Southold, of significance in Suffolk County. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IMPACT ASSESSMENT: Any activity that would degrade water quality, disrupt tidal patterns, increase sedimentation, or eliminate wetlands would adversely affect the birds and shellfish found in this area. It is essential that high water quality be maintained in the bay to protect the bay scallop and hard clam fishery. Development of harbor facilities and construction of breakwails or bulkheads would result in the loss of productive areas which support the fish and wildlife resources of Long Beach Bay. Ospreys nesting in the area may be affected by human disturbances, especially during the nesting and fledging period from March through mid-August. KNOWLEDGEABLE CONTACTS: Tom Hart or Andrew Milliken N.Y.S. Department of State Division of Coastal Resources & Waterfront Revitalization 162 Washington Avenue Albany, NY 12231 Phone: (518) 474-3642 Harry Knoch, Wildlife Manager or Michael Scheibel, Fish and Wildlife Technician ~SDEC - Region 1 Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, 5~ 11790 Phone: (516) 751-7900 Pieter VanVolkenburgh, Chief Bureau of Shellfisheries NYSDEC - Region 1 Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790 Phone: ~516) 751-7900 NYS DEC - Significant Habitat Unit Wildlife Resources Center Delmar, NY 12054 Phone: (518) 439-7486 Paul Stoutenburg, Martin Garrell, Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (516) 765-1801 or Jim McMahon i I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I Chris Smith ~S Sea Gr~nt Extension Service Cornell University Laboratory 37 Sound Ave. Riverhead, NY 11901 Phone: (516) 727-3910 Louise Harrison Suffolk County Department of Health Services Bureau of Environmental Management County Center Riverhead, NY 11901 Phone: (516) 548-3064 0 L D " ° - ~OU NOARll~: ?~mbY...Z.. ..................................................... __ I I I I I I 72'15~ and ~Jblished in 198~ ~ t~ New York SMte DeMK~t Trlfl~rtation, iff coo~rltion ~th the U.S. ~flt G; Quad: PLUI. i ISLAlO, I-. Area I,~ane: LOI.IG IIabltat BoungAry' - Pafe 2 of 3 ~£W ¥O~K-SUFFOLK (. 7.5 MINUTE SERIES 2 470 000 I J ,'/'ATE: · Quad: GP.~E1;PORT, Area Name: LONG BEACH BAY ~abicac Boundary: Page 3 of 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I COASTAL FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT RATING FORM Name of Area: Orient Harbor County(les): Suffolk Town(s): Southold 7.5' Quadrangle(s): Orient, NY-Conn.; Greenport, NY (is) (R) (isx~) Individual Replace- Final Score sbillty Score RARITY (ER): Moderately shallow open water bay area; common in Peconlc Bays area, hut rare on Long Island. Geometric mean: ~ = 20. 20 x 1.2 = 2A.O SPECIES VULNERABILITY (SV): Osprey (T) nesting. Diamondback terrapin (SC) may nest in the area, but the importance of the area to the species not documented. 25 x 1.2 = 30.0 HUMAN USE (HU): 25 Commercial bay scallop shellfishery is significant in the northeast region of the United States. x 1.2 = 30.0 POPULATION LEVEL (PL): 25 Concentrations of bay scallops significant in the northeast region of the United States; waterfowl concentrations significant between county and reglonal level, especially for scorers. x 1.2 = 30.0 REPLAOEABILIT~ (R): Irreplaceable 1.2 SIGNIFICANCE = [(ERxR) + (SVxR) + (HUxR) + (PLxR)] = 114.0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ***SIGNIFICANT COASTAL FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT*** PROJECT DESCRIPTION ORIENT HARBOR LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT: Orient Harbor is located near the eastern end of the north fork of Long Island, in the Town of $outhold, Suffolk County (7.5' Quadrangles: Orient, N.Y. - Conn.; and Greenport, N.Y.). This area is approximately 1900 acres in size, consisting primarily of open water area in the harbor, along with an undeveloped tidal wetland area and Dam Pond area on its north shore. Water depths in most of the harbor are generally less than 20 feet below mean low water. The harbor is bordered by much undeveloped land, including Orient Beach State Park to the east and south, and low density residential development on the west. FISH AND WILDLIFE VALUES: Orient Harbor is generally representative of the Peconic Bays ecosystem, in being a broad expanse of moderately shallow water. This habitat type is unlike the very shallow bays on the south shore of Long Island or the relatively narrow bays on the north shore. The tidal wetlands area adjoining Orient Harbor are an important component of this ecosystem, contributing to the biological productivity of the area. Orient Harbor is an important habitat for a variety of fish and wildlife species. From November through March, Orient Harbor supports wintering waterfowl concentrations of regional significance. Mid-winter aerial surveys of waterfowl abundance for the ten year period 1975-1984 indicate average concentrations of over 500 birds in the area each year (1,825 in peak year), including approxiF~tely 360 scoters (1,695 in peak year), along with lesser numbers of scaup, black duck, common goldeneye, bufflehead, red-breasted merganser, oldsquaw, canvasback, mallard, and Canada goose. In 1983 and 1984, Orient Harbor was also inhabited by ~~-~nesting pair of osprey (T), which utilized man-ma~W~s~£ng platforms located in the salt marsh ~-.~--~'~ ~~ harbor. The potential exists for additional nesting p~irs at this site. Diamondback terrapin (SC) have been seen here but the location of their nesting sites and the importance of this area to the species is not well documented. Orient Harbor is a productive habitat for marine finfish and shellfish. This area is one of the top scallop producing areas on Long Island, supporting a commercial shellfishery sign~iqant ~n the northeast region of the United States. The harbor also serves as a nursery and feeding area (from April-November, generally) for many estuarine fish species, and is an important spawning area for weakfish, winter flounder, and scup. ? '1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IMPACT ASSESSMENT: Any activity that would substantially degrade water quality in Orient Harbor would affect the biological productivity of this area. All species of fish and wildlife would be adversely affected by water pollution, such as chemical contamination (including food chain effects), oil spills, excessive turbidity or sedimentation, and waste disposal. It is essential that high water quality be maintained in the area to protect the bay scallop fishery. Thermal discharges, depending on time of year, may have variable effects on use of the area by marine species and wintering waterfowl. Installation and operation of water intakes could have a significant impact on juvenile (and adult, in some cases) fish concentrations, through impingement or entrainment. Construction of shoreline structures, such as docks, piers, bulkheads, or revetments, in areas not previously disturbed by development (e.g., natural beach or salt marsh), may result in the loss of productive areas which support the fish and wildlife resources of Orient Harbor. Ospreys in the area may be adversely affected by human disturbances (e.g., boat-landings or ~ ~z~f-f-i-~ close to the nest site), especially during the nesting and fledging period (March - mid-August). KNOWLEDGEABLE CONTACTS: Tom Hart or Andrew Milliken N.Y.S. Department of State Division of Coastal Resources & Waterfront Revitalization 162 Washington Avenue Albany, NY 12231 Phone: (518) 474-3642 Harry Knoch, Wildlife Manager NYSDEC - Region 1 State University of New York, Building 40 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Phone: (516)751-7900 ~Joh~ ~nole, Marine Resources Specialist IV Bureau of Marine Finfish and Crustaceans NYSDEC - Region 1 State University of New York, Building 40 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Phone: (516) 751-7900 Pieter VanVolkenburgh, Chief Bureau of Shellfisheries NYSDEC - Region 1 State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11790 Phone: (516) 751-7900 Building 40 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NYSDEC - Significant Habitat Unit Wildlife Resources Center Delmar, NY 12054 Phone: (518)439-7486 Paul Stoutenburg, Martin Garrell, Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (516) 765-1801 Chris Smith NYS Sea Grant Extension Service Cornell University Laboratory 37 Sound Ave. Riverhead, NY 11901 Phone: (516) 727-3910 Louis~fitarrison Suffo~County Department of Health Services Bure~h ~f Environmental Management County ~enter Rive~ead, NY 11901 Phon~: (516) 548-3064 or Jim McMahon m87 m + 99 m,, s o u T H 0 L 22 ORIENT HARBOR 20' 2 - 8 G.~iRDINER$ - ~ BAY 2 460 ooo 7250~m.E. I ;~;;,,,,~o,~r j ts SCALE 1:24.000 Quad: Orient, NY Area Name: Orient Harbor Habitat Boundary: Page 1 of 2 /23 2 2 · Peter~ Ne Pt 17'30" ;T Qu~d: Oeeenpo~t, NY Are& N~me: Opient Hepbop P~e 2 o~ 2 STAGE 1/2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD GREENPORT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Fc~ o 5 1999 Southold Town Planning Board Prepared for: Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Prepared by: Greenhouse Consultants 40 Exchange Place, 13th Floor New York, New York, 10005 December1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents ................................................................................................ ii List of Figures ........................................................................................................ iii List of Plates ....................................................................................................... iv List of Personnel ................................................................................................... v Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 Geography and Physical Setting ........................................................................ 2 Prehistoric Sensitivity ............................................................................................ 4 Historio Sensitivily ................................................................................................. 5 Sensitivity Evaluation Conclusions ....................................................................... 8 Field Methodology ............................................................................................. 9 Stratigraphic Summary ..................................................................................... 11 Artifact Analysis ................................................................................................. 1 2 Results ..................................................................................................... 1 5 Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................. 16 Bibliography ..................................................................................................... 1 7 Appendix 1 Field Record Forms Appendix 2 Artifact Inventory Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14 LIST OF FIGURES Location of the project area shown on portions of U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute series Orient and Greenport, N.Y. quadrangles. Prehistoric sites within lwo miles of the project area. From the 1829 Burr map. From the 1842 Mather map. From the 1855 U.S. Coast Survey. From the 1873 Beers Atlas. From the 1896 Hyde map. Location of Shovel Tests 1-58, 103-116 in the southwestern area. Location of Shovel Tests 59-80, 91-102, 117-184, 368-382 in the northwestern area. Location of Shovel Tests 81-90, 185-307, 431-537; Excavation Units 1 and 2 in the north central area. Location of Shovel Tests 308-344 in the northeastern area. Location of Shovel Tests 345-367, 383-388 in the east central area. Location of Shovel Tests 389-430 in the southeastern area. Location of the prehistoric site within the northern part of the project area. iii LIST OF PLATES Plate 1 Plate 2 Plate 3 Plate 4 Plate 5 Plate 6 Plate 7 Plate 8 View of Structure 2 in southwestern portion of project area, looking north. View of Structure 3 in southwestern portion of project area, looking northeast. View of Structure 4 in southwestern portion of project area, looking northeast. View of Structure 6 in southeastern portion of project area, looking south. View of Structure 7 in southeastern portion of project area, looking northeast. Shovel testing in progress showing field conditions. Location of prehistoric site, looking northeast showing field conditions. Northwest section of Excavation Units 1 and 2. iv LIST OF PERSONNEL William I. Roberts IV Paula M. Crowley William Goldsmith Lawrence Roper Dwight Warren Robert Martinez Allan Breche Principal Investigator Co-Author Laboratory Director Artifact Analyst Word/Data Processor Co-Author Field Supervisor Field Technician Field Technician Field Technician Field Technician INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to document the potential prehistoric and historic sensitivil¥ of the proposed Continuing Care Retirement Community project known as Peconic Landing at Southold located at Greenporf, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York through the review of existing archival, cartographic and published references. To provide a context for evaluating any identified resources within the parcel itself, the survey will include a synthesis of published and unpublished prehistoric and historic resources in the immediate area surrounding the project area. Following this, an archaeological survey of any locations with potential to preserve archaeological evidence will be conducted to determine the presence or absence of such sites. If any sites are located, a Stage 2 survey will be conducted to determine boundaries and significance. The project area consists of approximately 145 acres situated north of the Village of Greenport and west of East Marion. The proposed development will impact sixty to sixty-five acres of land within zones of potential archaeological sensitivity. The plans call for 8.9 acres of buildings, plus an existing building of 0.6 acres; 12.8 acres of paved surfaces, including roads and parking; and 24 acres of lawns and landscaping; plus an additional 24 acres of landscaping impacts which include a previously disturbed area used for the mining of sand. See Figure 1 for the location of the project area. The organization of this study is as follows: 1 ) a section describes the geography and physical setting of the project area; 2] a section follows on the prehistoric sensitivity of the area; 3) a review of the historic sensitivity of the area; 4) the conclusions to the sensitivity evaluation; 5) a section on the methodology used in the field survey; 6] a summa~/of the stratigraphy encountered; 7) a review of artifact processing and analysis; 8] the results of the field survey; and 9) the conclusions and recommendations. / / ILONG ISLAND 3, SOUND ~' Figure 1 7 'Cleaves' Pt ,/ 3 T I .H,- .... 0 / Hay ~each* :~r~ ...... -/ SCALE 1:24000 0 MILE Location of the project area shown on portions of U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute series Orient and Greenpart, N.Y. quadrangles. GEOGRAPHY AND PHYSICAL SEt'rING The geomorphology of Long Island is primarily characterized by the Ronkonkoma moraine, which extends from the Nassau County line to Montauk Point. Bedrock is overlain by the Cretaceous Raritan formation and the Magothy formation. The Raritan is composed of the Lloyd Sand member and an upper clay member. In the southwest portion of Suffolk County the Magothy formation is overlain by Jameco gravel, while outside of this area it is overlain by the marine Gardiners clay (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975:98). The climate of Suffolk County is humid-continental. The diurnal and annual temperature has a reduced range due to the moderating influence of the ocean. In general the frooze-free growing season is 200-210 days. However, the inland section is different due to the sea breeze only penetrating the island from five to eight miles (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975:96). The soils at the Peconic Landing at Southold prajeat area are Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (HaA), Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes [HaB], Riverhead sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes (RdA) and Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes (RdB). The Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (HaA) is found on outwash plains. Some of this soil type are found on moraines. They are usually situated on top of Iow-lying hills. The general soil profile includes an A1 horizon of 0 to 3 inches with a dark grayish-brown (10YR4/2) loam, a B21 horizon of 3 to 10 inches, brown to dark-brown (7.5YR4/4] loam; a B22 horizon of 10 to 19 inches, strong-brown [7.5YR5/6)loam and a B23 horizon of 19 to 28 inches with a yellawish-brown (10YR5/6} gravelly loam [United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975:Sheet Number 3; 71-72]. Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (HaB) ~s usually found on outwash plains and moraines, along shallow, intermiffent drainage channels (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975:Sheet Number 3', 72). The Riverhead sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes (RdA) is found on outwash plains. The general soil profiles includes an Ap horizon of O to 12 inches, dark to dark-brown [10YR4/3) sandy loam; a B2 horizon of 12 to 27 inches, strong-brown (7.5YR5/6) sandy loam and a B31 horizon of 27 to 32 inches, yellowish-brown [10YR5/4) loamy sand. Many of the Riverhead soils have a thin loamy sand horizon in the lower part of the B horizon with the same color range as the upper pad (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975:Sheet Number 3; 81-82). Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes (RdB) is found on moraines and outwash plains. It lies in areas along shallow, intemniffent drainageways (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975:Sheet Number 3; 83]. The geomorphologic character of the Town of Southold has been significantly altered through time. The mainland portion of Southold was originally three islands, which through time have been connected to each other by land resulting from alluvial formation [Thompson 1962:128). Around ca. 1840 Thompson wrote that the north shore cliff [opposite Greenport), washed away at its base, exposing its stratigraphy [ibid.:40}. The Harbor Hill moraine lies against the north shore of the island from Mt. Sinai Harbor to Orient Point. No bays exist and the shoreline is smooth in contrast to the neck section of the north shore, further west. The moraine ridge is visible from Wading River to Orient Point, to the north of the highway as it crosses the outwash plain which has numerous kettles. That is, it is visible until Mattituck and Orient Point the Harbor Hill ridge has been destroyed by water erosion and the outwash plain descends to sea level. The moraine reemerges on Plum Island [Van Diver 1985:71-72]. Our Field Supervisor visited the project area during May 1998. The properly is vacant. The parcel is covered with trees and undergrowth. Evidence of sand mining was seen north of 8recknock Hall, which lies in the out-parcel. There are two groups of structures formerly used for agriculture or as dwellings. Five structures are in the southwestern corner of the project area. Four of these will be removed. See Plates 1 through 3 far views of some of these buildings. Three structures are in the southeastern corner of the project area. All will be removed. See Plates 4 and 5 for views of two of these structures. PREHISTORIC SENSITIVITY A~ part of the project evaluation process, this sensitivity study has surveyed the files of the New York State Museum Division of Historical and Anthropological SeMces, and material on file at Greenhouse Consultants. The area searched was a two mile radius centered on the project area. One prehistoric site is known within two miles of the project area. It was reported by former New York State Archaeologist, Arthur C. Parker, early in this century, and is described in his text. The only site found during our search is New York State Museum site 4885. This is Parker's site ACP-SUFK-16. It is located approximately 0.8 miles southeast of the project area near Greenport. Parker describes the site as a village and shell midden along Greenport harbor and east of Greenport village [Parker 1922:698). Parker does not offer a date range for this site or describe any artifacts recovered. The date range may include the Woodland period based on Parker's description of it as a village, This settlement pattern was rare during the preceding Archaic and Paleo- Indian periods. See A in Figure 2. In terms of potential prehistoric sensitivity, the project impact area was evaluated from two points of view: 1. the proximity of known prehistoric sites in or near the project area; the presence of fresh water drainage courses in general, and particularly the identification of river or stream confluence situations where two or more drainages come together, providing access to both water and food supplies of both systems. This survey has documented the recorded or published location of one site within a two mile radius of the project area. The project area is the location of two natural kettle ponds. Archaeological sites are known adjacent to other such ponds along the narth shore of Long Island. Two sites exist in Riverhead near Hallock's Pond and the pond near Luce Landing. The ponds on the project area would have provided a source of fresh water, as well as attracting game. This makes the project area a possible location for a hunting camp. 4 . ,/ ,ONG 30 ~ Stii'lin~ '.5- SCALE 1:24000 ~ NiLE 0 , Figure 2 Prehistoric sites within two miles of the praject area. 'L .... - ........... ...................................... _L__ .... .......... HISTORIC SENSITIVITY At the time of European contact, the Corchaug tribe used the area from Wading River to Orient, fram the north shore of Peconic Bay through the Necks. The Manhasset tribe was on Shelter Island, Ram Island and possibly Hog Island {Thompson 1962:1:126-127). Shell heaps fram Native American occupation were present in Sfirling in the 1840s [ibid. 11:254]. On April 22, 1636, King Charles I requested that the Plymouth Company of New England issue their patent to William Alexander, Earl of Stirling, for Long Island and its adjacent islands. The earl gave a power of attorney to James Farret on Apdl 20, 1637, appointing Farret as agent to manage and dispose of these lands. William Alexander was born in 1580 and was made Earl in 1636. He died in 1640, his eldest son predeceasing him (Thompson 1962:1:165;11:211 ). in 1640, a group of men from New Haven bought Yennecock, which was the peninsula extension of Southold east of Cutchogue, Robbin's Island, Plum(b] Island, Great and Litlle Gull Islands, and Fishers Island from the Corchoug tribe. The exact date of the purchase is unknown due to documentation not surviving. They arrived in September of 1640, and included Rev. John Youngs, Isaac Arneld, John Budd, Jacob Corey, John Conk, ling, Mafthias Corwin, Peter Hallock, Barnabas Horton, Thomas Mapes, Richard Terry, John Tuthill, William Welles, and their families (Flint 1967:234). Wells was a lawyer from Norfolk, England and Horton was the wealthiest of the settlers [Hazelton 1925:694-695). The settlers made Southatd, a New Haven colony from 1640-1662, the oldest English settlement on Long Island. New Haven was merged into Connecticut by 1662, which was opposed by the Southalders, who disliked the charter [Thompson 1962:11:235-236). With a similar degree of protest, Southold was absorbed into New York jurisdiction on October 31, 1676 [Flint 1967:238; Thompson 1962:11:239-241 ). Under New York jurisdiction the present Town of Southold was originally part of Yorkshire. Yorkshire was divided by the Act of 1683 and the East Riding was renamed Suffolk Counly. The original Suffolk towns were: Easthampton to Montauk Point, Shelter Island, the Isle of Wight, Fisher's Island, Plum(b] Island, Huntington, Smithfield, Brookhaven, Southampton, and Southold. River Head was separated from Southold by an Act of Legislature on March 13, 1792 (Flint 1967:223; Thompson 1962:11:273). Greenport, East Marion and Orient lie on the narrow neck of the Nodh Fork, former participants in the whaling industry of the nineteenth century. Greenport was founded in 1827. Captain Webb originally owned the site of the village and the properly was sold by his heirs to three neighbors [Thompson 1962:11:251). In the first quarter of the twentieth century the area was described as covered with farms with evidence of fisheries and remnants from the whaling daYs. It also had a budding toudst indusf~/dudng the summer months (Hazelton 1925:714). David Floyd constructed Brecknock Hall between 1850 and 1857. The Italianate mansion ,was made of stone, most of which was mined on the property. The grounds were famously landscaped into gardens and fountains. It was a large estate and supposedly self-supporting. David Floyd was the grandson of General William Floyd, the only Long Islander to sign the Declaration of Independence. David Floyd was involved in shipping, whaling, banking and real estate. The ancestry of the Floyd family on Long Island begins with Richard Floyd, a Welshman, who resided at Setauket in 1656, and became the owner of a large landed estate. Brecknock Hall remained in the hands of the Floyd family for nearly one hundred years, while the properly went into decline. The properly was originally in the hands of John Youngs (Thompson 1962:111:358-370; Brecknock Hall Society 1994; Corwin and Corwin 1972:40; Case 1876:11-12) Cari'o,qraphic Evidence A series of maps depicting the project area and surroundings during the nineteenth century were collected as part of this research. The earliest depiction found is the 1829 Burr map. See Figure 3. The project area is part of vacant land to the northwest of the road, now mown as N.Y.S. Route 25. The location is labeled "Racco Point." This title is a corruption of "Rocky Point"' and refers to the point of land to the northeast. The 1842 Mather map also shows the project area as vacant land. This map shows the sefflements of Greenport and Stirling. The main road, now N.Y.S. Route 25, is shown as are a few other roads. Rocky Point is correctly labeled. See Figure 4. Figure 5 is taken from the 1855 U.S. Coast Survey. Several changes are evident since 1842. There are now several structures along the northwestern side of the main road. Two of these appear to be within the out-parcel. These are in the center of three properties and are probably Brecknock Hall and an outbuilding. The other two structures appear to lie within the project area near to N.Y.S. Route 25. A pond is shown within the project area near to the shoreline. Figure 6 presents part of the 1873 Beers Arias. The project area appears to include one structure labeled "D.G. Floyd." A second structure appears close to the main road within the out-parcel. This is probably the Floyd house, Brecknack Hall. The structure within the project area is probably a barn. Just outside the project area to the southwest is another structure near to the road. This may be associated with two additional structures labeled "B. Wiggins." Ta the northeast of the project area is a structure close to the road labeled "J.H. Wiggins." The pond within the project area continues to be shown. The final map, the 1896 Hyde map, is presented here in part as Figure 7. This map is somewhat diagrammatic, so it is not possible to place the project area on it with accuracy. The pond is not shown. A row of structures is shown along the northwestern side of the main road. Those in the vicinity of the project area are labeled "D.G. Floyd ESt.,"' "Grace Floyd" and "H.M. Jerome." In summary, it is clear that a number of farms were developed along the main road during the nineteenth century. These are sparse during the 1840s but occupy nearly all of the northwestern side of the road by 1896. The project area itself appears to remain vacant until circa 1855, when structures appear along the road. These include Brecknock Hall in the out-parcel, but also other nearby structures within the project area. These appear to be owned by the Floyd family. APPROXIMATE LOCATION Figure 3 From the 1829 Burr map. 'Project 0 miles (Icole approx.) Figure 4 From the 1842 Mather map, Project FlgLi~e 5 From the 1855 U.S. Coast Survey. 11 ~RK ISLAND Figure 7 From the 1.896 HYde map, SENSITIVITY EVALUATION CONCLUSIONS The Peconic Landing project area is judged sensitive to preserving possible prehistoric archaeological evidence. This assessment is due to the presence of one known prehistoric site within lwo miles, and elevated, well-drained land on the project area near a pond, Prehistoric sites have been found along the north shore of Suffolk Courtly adjacent to similar ponds. This makes the project area a possible location for prehistoric occupation. The Peconic Landing project area may also contain archaeological deposits from the historic period. Brecknack Hall, built 1850 to 1857 by David Floyd, exists within the out-parcel along N.Y.S. Route 25. Several outbuildings are within the project area. We recommend that Stage lB archaeological testing of the project area be completed. This procedure should consist of shavel tests on a 50 faot grid pattern or to an equivalent level of effort for all locations to be impacted that are within 250 feet of fresh water sources or nineteenth century structures. described, and recorded in terms of texture, inclusions and Munsell colors. See Appendix 1 for the original survey record forms. The methodology for the excavation units was as follows. Once the units were laid out the elevations of the corners were recorded using a line level and rule. Since the ground surface was relatively fiat, all measurements were relative to the ground surface at the corners of the units. Excavation then proceeded by natural strata. The strata were recorded on preprinted context forms. The soils were described as to texture, inclusions and Munsell colors, Elevations of the four corners were recorded for all interfaces between contexts and for the bottom of the excavation. Excavation ceased after a minimum of 0.5 feet of the subsoil had been removed. Shovels and trowels were used in the excavation. All soil from the excavation unit was screened through 1/4-inch mesh to assist with the recover' of artifacts. Appendix 1 provides copies of the original field record forms. See Plate 8 for the northwest section of Excavation Units 1 and 2. 10 (6" RAINFALL-) E:,'I-E N TI ON TI~ATION MA~ (ISTING -y KEY O Shovel Test Completed A' Shovel Test Abandoned due to Field Conditions Figure 8 Location of'Shovel Tests 1-58, 103-116 In the southwestern area, KEY · Shovel Test Completed · Shovel Test Abandoned due to Field Conditions Figure 9 Location of Shovel Tests 59-80, 91-102, 117-184, 368-382 in the northwestern area. KEY · Shovel Test Completed . · Shovel Test Abandoned due to Field Condftions ' I [ ' Figure 10 Location of Shovel Tests 81-90, ' 85-307, 431-537; Excavation Units 1 and 2 in the north central area, ' I /.... / /;' / /. KEY · Shovel Test Completed ~ I I ' · Shovel Test Abandoned Figure 11 Location of Shovel Tests 308-344 In the northeastern area, 0 0 Q 0 0 0 Co O, 120 130 fl) 0 ~) P~ES~IAN:PATH( , SANITARY PUMP STA'~ON KEY 0 Shovel Test Completed · Shovel Test Abandoned due to Field Conditions TO BE RE'OVEn --~_'~,__~ ¸,7 Figure 13 Location of Shovel Tests 389-430 In the southeastern area. STRATIGRAPHIC SUMMARY From one to four layers were recorded in the 537 shovel tests and two excavation units completed. Thirh/-three tests had one layer. Forty-one tests had two layers. Six tests and one excavation unit had four layers. The remaining 463 shovel tests and one excavation unit had three layers. The top layer had a texture described as loam, sandy loam or sand. Loam predominated. Root mat was noted in all cases except ten. Color ranged from brown through dark brown and very dark brown to very dark greyish brown and black. Very dark greyish brown was most common. Thickness ranged from 0,1 to 0.4 feet, averaging 0.14 feet thick. The top layer was identified as topsoil. The second layer had a texture consistently described as sandy loam. No inclusions were noted. Color ranged from dark yellowish brown through brown and dark brown to dark greyish brown. Dark yellowish brown was most common. Thickness ranged from 0,2 to 2,6 feet. It averaged 0,85 feet thick. The second layer was identified as the plow zone or A horizon. The third layer had a texture described as sand or sandy loam. Sandy loam predominated. No inclusions were noted. Color ranged from light yellowish brown through yellowish brown and dark yellowish brown to brown. Dark yellowish brown predominated. The top of the third layer was found between 0.3 and 2.8 feet below grade. It averaged 0,97 feet below grade. In Excavation Unit 1 this layer was penetrated. It was 1,4 to 2.1 feet thick. The third layer was identified as the subsoil. The shovel tests excavated in the vicinity of the planned new ponds north of Brecknock Hall nearly all had only one layer, This layer was consistent with the third layer described above, Six shovel tests and Excavation Unit 1 had four layers. This layer was a mottled combination of the second and third layers in Shovel Tests 221, 223 and 224. The fourth layer in Excavation Unit 1 was a light yellowish brown sand identified as subsoJJ. Shovel tests 11, 27 and 220 had a layer of fill between the first and second layers. The fill was sand or gravel in texture and yellowish brown or dark yellowish brown in color. It was 0.4 to 0.6 feet thick. Fill was also noted in ShoveJ Tests 16, 17, 20-22, 24-26 and possibly 6 and 7. Texture was similar to Shovel Tests 11, 27, and 220, Color was yellowish brown to brown. 11 ARTIFACT PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS Laboraton/Methodolocly The artifacts recovered from the field work at the Peconic Landing were returned to the Greenhouse Consultants Laboratory in New York City for processing. The cultural material was washed in room temperature tap water, dried, marked, and catalogued. The drying procedure consisted of slow air drying on screens in the laboratory processing area. The artifacts were labeled with their appropriate context number, Artifacts were identified using a modified form of the Cultural Material Data Base Taxonomy ct the National Park SeB4ce. Artifacts were coded tot their functional group, class and material. Technological and sh4istic manufacturing ranges were assigned when an artifact exhibited a datable attribute. Establishing the range of manufacture of artifacts provides a time frame for establishing dates after which the refuse deposits were made. This information was recorded on a tyvek label which was inserted with the artifact into a clear polyethylene ziplock bag. The bags were also labeled with context and catalog numbers. Subsequent to cataloguing, the information from all artifacts with their appropriate codes were inventoried using Paradox, a relational database software, which provides sorted inventory lists for contexts and artifact groups. Contexts were assigned series numbers in accordance to the type of data recovery method. Shovel testing is identified by the 3000 series. Excavation Units are designated by the 5000 series, Staqe lB Analvsis Three hundred ninety-one artifacts were collected for this stage. recovered from 117 shovel tests. The artifacts were Historic artifacts numbered 194 in the functional groups of kitchenware, architectural remains, furnishings, guns, clothing, personal items, tobacco related items and activities. The functional group, Kitchen consisted of 67 items. Ceramics included twenty pieces of ironstone, three sherds of porcelain, one pieces of redware, three pieces of stoneware, and one piece of pearlware. Glass artifacts included one piece of milk glass, ten pieces of bottle glass and 28 pieces of container glass. The cup or bowl of ironstone in Context 3273.01 was blue spatterware decorated, popular in the nineteenth century, especially the middle of the century, Pearlware was found in 12 Context 3356.02, decorated in underglaze handpainted blue. Pearlware was popular from ca. 1779 to 1840. Architectural remains consisted of flat glass, nails, brick, concrete, a spike, and asbestos shingles. They numbered 67 in total for this functional group. Cut nails appeared in shovel tests 3014,02, 3016.02, 3068.02, and 3187.02. The remains of furnishing totaled seven in number, including a flowerpot sherd, decorative glass and lamp glass. A Remington 12 gauge express shotgun shell appeared in Context 3011.02, A plastic button was found in Context 3479.02, part of the functional group of clothing, A piece of a broken mirror appeared in Context 3016.02, in the functional group of personal belongings. Two pieces of tobacco pipe were found, a stem in Context 3068.02 and part of a decorated bowl in Context 3253.02. The decoration was a minute part of the face, with a beard and mustache, Corroded metal, a bolt, and plastic were the eleven items falling into the functional group, activities. Coal, slag, and charcoal were among the 37 items that fell into the functional miscellaneous category'. Bones and shell, numbering 82, were found in the the shovel tests. They cannot be attributed to either the historic or prehistoric period. Ninety prehistoric artifacts were found in 27 shovel tests. These remains were all made from quartz. They consisted of primary and secondary flakes, with the possibility of one core in Context 3240.02 and a biface fragment in Context 3518,02, Cores provide the raw material to manufacture stone tools. Primary flakes refer to the first layer removed from a rock, and have the cortex, or rind of the outer surface of the rock on the flake. Secondary flakes are the debris resulting from the manufacture of tools, that no longer have, or have very little of the surface cortex or rind. Primary and secondary flakes are debris resulting from the manufacturing of stone tools. Bifaces are stone tools that are in the process of being manufactured into tools. 13 Sta~e 2 Analysis Two excavation units were dug and 741 artifacts were recovered: 389 from Excavation Unit 1 and 352 from Excavation Unit 2. Except for a piece of wood and a piece of root in Context 5002.02, all the remaining 739 artifacts were prehistoric. All were made of quarlz. One biface, four cores, 188 primary flakes and 546 secondary flakes were found in the two units. 14 RESULTS The Stage lB testing, Shovel Tests 1 through 435, produced prehistoric or possible prehistoric artifacts from 27 locations within the project area. All these items came from the vicinity of proposed cottages 31 through 45, the new pond to the east, the proposed tennis courts and part of the proposed community center building. Stage 2 testing was conducted at these locations. The Stage 2 testing resulted in defining the boundaries of the site represented by these finds. The site is in the location of cottages 36 and 37. This location is on the high ground west of the pond and overlooking the beach. See Figure 14, This site was judged to have potential for expanding our knowledge of prehistoric occupation of the north shore of Suffolk County. An area only six feet by three feet within this site produced 739 prehistoric lithic artifacts. This dense concentration of artifacts indicates that the remainder of the site has the potential to produce even more such artifacts, Despite the lack of discrete features, the site located in the vicinity of Coffages 36 and 37, in our opinion, meets the criteria for inclusion in the New York State and National Register of Historic Places. Historic artifacts dating to the nineteenth and twentieth centuries were also found in the Stage lB testing, but no concentrations were apparent. In particular, no concentrations of nineteenth century artifacts were found near the buildings in the southwestern and southeastern corners of the project area. 15 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This report documents the procedures and results of the Stage 1/2 archaeological testing of the Peconic Landing project area in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County. Based on this objective ground testing, it can now be concluded that one significant prehistoric archaeological site exists within the northern portion of the project area on the high ground west of the pond and overlooking the surf. The site was evidently used for manufacturing and/or modifying stone tools. No other significant prehistoric or historic sites exist within the project area. We recommend that either the location of the prehistoric site be avoided by all construction activities, or that Stage 3 data recovery excavations be completed here prior to the construction of Cottages 36 and 37, and the associated road and driveways, Plate 1 View of Structure 2 in southwestern portion of project area, looking north, Plate 2 View of Structure 3 in southwestern portion of project area, looking northeast. Plate 3 View of Slructure 4 in southwestern podion of project area, looking northeast. Plate 4 View of Structure 6 in southeastern podion of project area, looking south. Plate 5 View of Structure 7 in southeastern portion of proiect area, !ooking northeast. Plate 6 Shovel testing in progress showing field conditions. Plate 7 Location of prehistoric site, looking northeast showing field conditions. Plate 8 Northwest section of Excavation Units 1 and 2. BIBLIOGRAPHY Brecknock Hall Society 1994 Brecknock Hall. Case, Albertson Esq. 1876 Historical Sketch of Southold ?own. Reprint of speech delivered by the Town Clerk at the Cdbraflon in Greenport, L.I., on July 4th, 1876: Corwin, E.K. and P.L 1972 Greenport Yesterday and Teday. Flint, Martha B. 1967 Long/s/and Before the Revo/u#on. A Co/on/a/Stuck. Ira J. Friedman, Inc., Port Washington, N.Y, Originally published 1896, Ear/yLong ts/and. Hazeiton, Henw I. 1925 The Boroughs of Brook/yn and Quoons Count/es of Nassau and Suffolk, Long/s/and, New York 1509- ! 924. Volume II. New York: Lewis Historical Publishing Company, Inc. Parker, Arthur C, 1922 The Archaeological History of New York. New York State Museum Bulleflh, Nos, 235-238. Thompson, Benjamin F. 1962 H/story of Long/s/and From/ts Discovery c~nd SeNement to the Present ?/me. 3rd ed. 3 vols. Port Washington, N.Y.: Ira J. Friedman, Inc. Originally published 1 st ed. 1839. United States Depadment of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975 So//Survey of Suffolk Counl~, New York, Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. MAPS AND ATLASES Beers, Frederick W. 1873 Arias of Long/s/and, Ne~, York from Recent andActua/ Surveys and Records. New York: Beers, Comstock and Cline Burr, David H. 1829 Map of the Courtly of Suffolk, Published by the Surveyor General pursuant to an Act of Legislature. 17 Hyde and Company 1896 Map of Long/s/and. Brooklyn, New York: Hyde & Co. Mather, W.W. 1842 Geo/og/ca/Map oflon~7 & Sfaten/s/ands. New York, New York: W.W. Mather. United States Coast Survey 1855 M/ddle Pan' of Long/s/and Sound. Directed by F.R. Hassler. United States Geological Survey 1956 Greenpoff, New York Quadfan~7/e. 7.5 minute series topographic map. 1956 Or/enf, N. Y,-Conn. Quadrangle. 7.5 minute series topographic map. 1956 $outho/d,, New York Quadfan~7/e. 7.5 minute series topographic map. 18 APPENDIX 1 CONTEXT NUMBERING AND PROVENIENCE LABEUNG APPENOD( 1 CONTEXT NUMBERING AND PROVENIENCE LABEUNG A field recording system which encompasses a variety of conditions and situations is optimal for any archaeological project. Among these situations are the size of the proiecr~ the number of different field techniques and the number of expected a~focte. The field recording system used was developed by Greenhouse Consultants and was based on modifications of other acceptod systems. All contexts are numbered in the field and these numbers are applied to the ar~facte. The format for numbering is XX-9999.99 where X is alphanumeric and 9 is numeric. T~e alphanumeric characters to the left of the hyphen are the prefix The two d[gite to the right of the decimal point are used only when i~ is necessary to refer to s~rata within a con~ext. The four digits between the prefix and decimal subdivision may be called the base code. The prefix is a two character designation of the project parcel. The four digit numeric base code can be divided into two parts; the first digit being separate from the last three. The first numeric digit indicates the t~pe of field technique used. The codes are as follows: 1 fiX30: unprovenienced surface collection 20~0: provsnienced surface colleci~on 3000: shovei testing 40~0: trenching 5~03: excavation unite 60(~: feature excavation 7000: borings 80OO: 9E)03: transecte The three digits following the technique code are unique for each ~ocation and are assigned sequentially. Decimal subdivisions may be used for techniques three through six to indicate specific strata. For example, O1-3~01.02 refers to Area 1 (O1), shovel test [3), number 1 (O01), at ~he second layer SURVEY RECORD SHEET :pastholes, Au~erhole$,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslholes, Auller hole,s, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auler holes, Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel :ests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHT. ET : Postholes, Augerhotes, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovei tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auller holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : po~thole, Auser holes, Shovel tes~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Pastholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Pasrholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger hol~, Shovel te~t$ 'i SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger hole, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Augerhole$, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Poltholes, Auger hales, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : PostholeS, Auger holes, Shovel tesU SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser hole%Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: PosthoJes, AUller holes, ShoveJ tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : pesthQle~,Ause~hele~,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, AuBer holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET ~ Postholes, Au~ler holes, Shovel tesls . SURVEY RECORD SHEET *' Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel test~ · SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tes~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tesL~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET: postho~et, Auger hole~ Shevel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET :Postholes, Auger holes, Sbevel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : PQstholes, Auger holes, 5hovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auser holes, ShoveJ tes~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auger hole~, Shove~ tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel teats SURVEY LRECORD SHEET: postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel telu SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auserheles, Shovelltesrs SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Au~or hol~ Shovel tests 4 SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tesu SURVEY RECORD SHEET: poslholes, AUllerhole~,Shevelte~l~ '-' SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Augerhole~,Shove~tes~s SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Augerholes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~% Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Augerhole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes~ Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auler holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET :Postholes, Auger hole$, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel te~ts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auller holes, Shovel te~ts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auger flole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel testes SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auler holes, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel te~t$ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Augerholes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, ShoveJ tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, AuBer holes, Shovel te~$ '. SURVEY RECORD SHEET: PasU~oles, Au~erhole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests PROIECT: (~:~¥,J C L ~'c'~ COORDINATES : /(~ ' ~1~ {-~- ~; 51~ I SUPERVISOR: EX~VATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST AND NO, SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Pas~holes, Auger hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel te$l~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tesL~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovelte~ts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Augerhole$, Shovel tests SITE: SUPERVISOR: EX~VATOR: ~REENED 1 DATE: T~T 7 SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel testS ? SURVEY RECORD SHEET: poSzhales, Auser holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslhole$, Auger holes, Shovel tests / SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tesL~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET :Postholes, Auserholes, Shovel tests' SURVEY RECORD SHEET ~ Postholes, Auger hole, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Posthole, Auger holes, Shovel tesls . SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holeS, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser flol~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~ Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Aulerholes, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET: poslholes, Auser hole, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : pestholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests_ SURVEY RECORD SHEET: postholes, Auler holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET ~ Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslholes, Auser holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes~ Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Augerholes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthole~, Auler holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, AUller hale~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel t~ts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hol~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel te~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger hales, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : PostholeS, Augerholes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : PostholeS, Auger hole~, Shovel tests EITE I SUPER¥IEOR ~ EXCAVATOR I'~ SCREENEO ~ D~T£: 'EST TYPE SURVEY RECORD SHEET = Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel te~t~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auler hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tes~ '1 SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Ause~' holes~ Shovel tes~ CULT. MAT. SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tests "5' SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tes~z g SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET t Postholes, Augerhales~ ~hovel test_l SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel lests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes~ Auger holes, Shoveltests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel te~t$ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED ! DATE z TEST'I'YPE SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : pos~zholes, Auger holes, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auler holes, Shovel tests I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel te~t$ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET :Postholes, Augerhole~, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel ~ests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel rests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes. A~ugerholes, Shovel test~. SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auler holes, Shovel tests / SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslhole~, Aullet hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shaveltest$ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, AUllet holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORO SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tesL~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovdd tesL~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~ Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auser holes, Shovel tall SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthole~, Auser holes, Shovel te~ts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Augerhole~, Shovel tes~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel t~sts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel te~ts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole.s, Shove[ teSL~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel te~ts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests ~r/~ ~1~ SURVEy RECORD SHEET: Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel test~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auger holes, Shove[ tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tes~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslholes, AuEer holes, ShoveJ tests SITE ~ SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED ! DATE: T~STTYPE SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Poslhole~, Auser holel~ Shovd teltl SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests I I. ~' l, o ~,,.,~ '~ , ~,~:.~., . SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel te~ts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Augerholes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Augerholes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthole~, Auger holes, Shovel tests PROJECT: ~Y'~d~I(~ ~, ,J~/,A/;r I COORDINATES : SI~ ~ SUPERV~OR: EX~VATOR: SCREENED I DATE: TEST~FE AND NO. ~ o'~'-/~/ ~[ ~ '~ ,~ ~, :',,~'.r...¢ A' SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Posthole~, AuEer hole~, Shovd te~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tesL~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Augerholes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auser holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Au8er hole~, Shovel tesL~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests STRATIGRAPHY.: SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel t~ts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel te~ts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : pestholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SITE I ~ SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED I DATE: 'EST TYP~ STRATIGRAPHY.: SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel te~t$ SURVEY RECORD SHEET :Postholes, Auger holes, Shovd tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, ShoveJ tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthales, Auller hol~, Shavel tesL~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel te~ts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Aullerhol~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser Ilole~, Shovel tests PROJECT I: ,,., ....-., SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auser hole~, Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, AuBer hole, ShoYel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthole.% Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes. Shovd tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tests 51TE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED f DATE: TEST TYPE LC- ~c ~:~; ',1;"~lfT'~':i er. ?: ~ ( SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, AuEet holes, Shove[ tes~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shover tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET ; Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel te~s SURVEY RECORD SHEET : poslholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORO StrEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel t~sts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslholes, Auger holes, Shovet tests PROJECT : ~7~0b.lIC ~1~,1~1,~. COORDINATES : ~/'~e' N'~ o~ ~d SITE: SUPERVISOR: EX~VATOR: SCREENED ~ DATE: TEXTYPE r SITE: SUPERVISOR: EX~VATOR: SCREENED ~ DATE; TEST ~PE SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, AuEet holes, Shovel tests SITE: SUPERVISOR: EX~VATOR; SCREENED I DATE: T~T AND NO. SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests 4 SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests l SITE ~ iUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED ! DATE: TEST TYPE ~AYER DEPTH * DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT. MAT. NOTES SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel Ces~s PROJECT: ~(D~r (_ ~A .'~)'( '/- COORDINATES : SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED ? DATE: TESTTYPE SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auserholes, Shard tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholel, Auger holes, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Aul~erhole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tests SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED I DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : SURVEY RECORD SHEET :Postholes, Auger hole$, Shovel tests PROJECT: ~,/~,,~L L/~ ~3'~,tJc~ COORDINATI~S : ~' /~ a~. SITE: SUPERVISOR: EX~VATOR: SCREENED ~ DATE: T~T ~ O,-O~ ~k*.~ to~'~l~ I~, ~,l~ · ~ d,)~d-d SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel te~t$ . r SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, AuEer SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD SHEET : poslholes, Auger holes, Shovel SURVEY RECORO SHEET : postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tesL~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger ho{es. Shovel tests I PRO)ECT: ~ ~/-'./~.; ~ L ~.~1 ~;~.,~. COORDINATES : SITE: ~UPERYISOR: EX~VATOR: SCREENED I DATE; 'EST TYPE ' -".~,. -" V 5'~J~ &~ ~X~, ~C. SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslholes, ^user holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Augerholes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, ShoveL tests PROJECT: ~';~ (C '$~ L~'~r~9'£1~~ COORDIr~ATES : ~D~ ~ =~ ~'~ ' ~ SITE: SUPERVISOR: EX~VATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EX~VATOR: SCREENED t DATE: TESTTYP[ L~ ~,~ 'I~ ' 'e/:~,'/~ ~. ~ ~: SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests '1 SITE: SUPERVISOR t EX~VA~R: SCREENED 1 DATE: T~T AND SURVEY RECORD SHE£T : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tesr-s SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poszholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tests PROJECT : SITE: SUPERVISOR: EX~VA~R J ~R~ENED I DATE: TEST~PE SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shevel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovet tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shove[ tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auler ho[es, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes. Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger holes. Shovel tests LAYER DE.H. DESCRIP.~ mcoLoR CULT. MAT. NOTES I/ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET ; Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORO SHEET :Postholes, Aulerholes, Shovel te~t$ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holel, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes~ Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hales~ Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests ~'(',. I:.' C L~' ~l~Y'~' ~1(% COORDINATES : ~.~. ' PROJE~ SITE: SUPERVISOR ~ EX~VATOR; SCREENED ~ DATE SURVEy RECORD SHEET : Posl, holes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET :Postholes, Auge~'holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET :Postholes. Auger hole$. Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes. Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes~ Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes~ Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests PROJECT: (~{(.C) r~!(~ L~t~[~Jt~ COORDINATES : SITE: SUPERVISOR: EX~VATOR: SCREENED ? DATE ~ h~c~ Y~" SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel test~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET: poszholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes, Auger hole, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auserholes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tes[s SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poszho~es, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslhole~, Auger holes, ShoveJ tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests : o.d' o-t' -~J.~I [oa~. e:X r.-,/ " SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auller holes, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes. Shovel tests COORDINATES : ~" ~.~ ;~' ~"~, ~' ... pROJECT: ?~,.,.1¢ ~_4,.~r?,~, : SITE: SUPERVISOR: EX~VATOR: SCREENED ~ DATE: TEST ~PE SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes, Auler holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Pos~holes, Auller holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel A SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Aul~et hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postho{es, Auger holes, Shovel (ests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET :Postholes, Auger holes. Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holts, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Aulerholes, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests · SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel (ests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes, Auser holes, ShoYel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : poslholes, Augerholes, Shoveltestl .1 SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger ho~es, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shove! tests SURVEy RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auserholes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET :postholes, Aullerholes~Shoveltests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auger holes. Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger holes, Shave! tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes. Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes Shove ests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovet tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Au]ger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tesB SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthotes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger hole~, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auser holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET :Postholes, Augerholes, Shoveltests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hoies, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger hole~. Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET :Postholes, Augerholes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auser holes, Shovel tests SURVI~Y RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Sbovel~ess~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests 'i SURVEY RECORD SHEE¥ :Postholes, Auger holes. Shoveltests SURVEY RECORD S~ET po~halcJ, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovd tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Po$~oles, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Pos~oles, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEy RECORD SIIEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Silovel tests SURVEy RECORD SHEET : Postho es, Auger ho es, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD 5HEET : Fos~holes, Auger i~oles, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET :postholes, Auger hole$, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes~ Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslholes, Auser holes, Shove[ tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Poslholes, AuKef hopes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posflloles, Auger holes~ Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Poslholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Poslholes, Au~e,r holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: pos~oles, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auge~r holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes~ Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: postholes, Auger holes. Shovel te~ts LAYER 1 SURVEY RECORD SHEET :Posthole$, Auger holes~ Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslhole~, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Aug:er holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: postholeS, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger hol~s, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Poslholes, Auger hole% Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auller holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes~ Shovel tests COORDINATES PROJECT SITE: ~UPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: I'ESTTYPE AND NO. : SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET; Po~tholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET; Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger boles, Shovel ~ests C~ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shover tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET ; Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posth~s,)Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: Postho e% Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SIIEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SIIEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD StlEET : Poslltoles, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SI IEET: poslholes, Auger holes, Shovel te~ls SURVEY RECORD StlEET : Posllloles, Auger holes, Shovel tests suRVEY RECORD SUEET : Postholes, Augerholes, SIiovel te~t$ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shuvel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Poslholes, Auger'holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes~ Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD $11EET : Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel lulls SURVEY RECORD SflEET : postholes, Auger holes~ Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET ; Postholes, Auger holes~ Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD SHEET ; Poslholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SIIEET: Postholcs, Auger IIoles, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SflEET ; poslholes, Auger holes, Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD SIIEET : Postholes, Auge~ holes, Shuvel tesls SURVEY RECORD SIIE£T : Poslholes, Auger' holes, Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD SHE£T: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD StlEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD StlEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SIIEET : PosCholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SIIEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SIIEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SIIEET : Postholes, Augerholes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SIIEET: Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD sIIEET: Poslholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SUEET : postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SIIEET : Postholes, Auger holes~ Shovel tesls SURVEY RECORD SIIEET : Po$1holes, Auger holes, Shuvel tests SURVEY RECORD 511EET : Postholes, Auget holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET: postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel le~t$ SURVEY RECORD S~IEET: Postholes. Auger holes, Shovel tests 2 A SURVEY RECORD SHEET ; Postholes, Auger holes, Shovel tests '1 CREW CHIEF RECORDER DATE , /0 CENTER POINT COORDINATES 3~ -o.E ' Mw -0.]' ~""' c - o.'~' c - Overlies Ox ARTIFACTS IN SITU CONTEXT Nb24BER RECORDER ~.-/2' C ' I.a- c: - PHO'i'O~R,~PllS (Roi]. I.): ST~&TICRAPHY Overlaid by Cx # ~ Overlie~ Cz # Cuts Cx I Cut by Cx ! Abuts Cx # Eqvlent to Cx ! OBLIQUE ~r~ lO / ~7 _ Overlies COLOR COMPL~FE ART[FACT INVENTORY TABLES FOR CODING MATERIAL CULTURE Table for National Park Se~ice Material Culture Data Base Coding Char~ Groups, Classes and Material Table for Data Base Coding Chart: Groups and Classes Table for Data Base Coding Chart: Prehisto~c A~facts - Class and Morphology O. Table for Date Base Coding Chart: Ambiguous Items of Material Culture ~8ooooooo88~ ~ ~oo8o uooo3 ~S8oo8 APPENDIX 2 C. Table for Date Base Coding Chart: Prehistoric Artifacts- Class and Morphology Class 01: Hunting and Fishing Activities Class OB: Other Fabricating or Processing Tools 01 - Projectile point 02 - Birdstene 03- Bannerstone 04 - Boatetone 05 - Fish hook OB - Netsinker 07 - Atlati hook 51 - Perforator 52 - Drill 53 -Awl 54- Reamer 55 - Chisel 56 - Microperforator 57 - Needle 58 - Graver Class 02: Domestic Activities 13 - vessel 14 - mortar 15 - pestle 17 - groundstone fragment Class 03: Stone Working 21 - Hammeratene 22 - Baton 23 - Tine 24 - Splinter 25 - Drift or "punch" 27 - Flake, primary 28 - Flake, secondary 29 - Biracial thinning flake 30- Core 32 - Tested piece Class 07: General Utility Tools 67 - Knife 68 -Side scraper 69 - Core scraper 70-Stemmed end scraper 71 - Other end scraper 73 - Prismatic blade 74- Chopper 75 - Utilized/Retouched flake 76 - Pieced pebble 77 - Gouge 78 - Maul 79- Abrader 8O - Whetetone 81 - Biface 82 - Adze 8:3- Distelateral scraper 84- Bifacial end scraper 85 - Bifacial scraper Class 08: Ceremonial & Ornamental Objects Class 04: Wood Working 37 - Celt 38 ~ Grooved axe 39 - Spokeshave Class 16: Ethnobotenical Seeds Nuts 85- Angled pipe B6-Tube 87 - Platform pipe 88- Cloud blower pipe 89 - Sheet 9D - Plates 91 - Comb 92 - Bead 93 - Gorget - - Hematite - - Dchre APPENDIX 2 O. Table for Data Case Coding Chart: Ambiguous Items of Material Culture Note= The items listed below may be ambiguous or hard to place in a taxonomic catagory, but as a convention, for inventory purposes, will be coded as follows~ Unidentified wood fragments 98 00 006 Construction wood 03 O6 Pegs. Wood planks 03 06 OOC Twigs, branches 09 16 Burned wood (partial) Code as wood (above) and put "burnt wood~ in the comments section Charcoal and all small fragments of completely burnt wood Code as charcoal Coal 98 O0 095 Slag, burned coal, vitrified metabvorking or manufacturing by-products 98 O0 112 Pantiles 03 00 003 Delft fireplace tiles, wa~l skirting, ete~ 04 04 003 Porcelain bathroom tiles, cther bathroom furniture (tub, teiler~ etc.) OS 05 001 Chamber pot 04 02 Flowerpot 04 04 002 Teeth 02 132 Fish scales 02 09 118 Coral 04 04 119 Eggshell 02 OS 119 Seeds, seed covering 02 16 121 Schist (construction) 03 06 043 Schist [unidenr~ lied) 98 00 043 Ced b~ck 03 06 169 Yellow brick 03 08 155 Linoleum 03 06 101 Metal hardware (probably construction) 03 06 { ) Furniture hardware 04 01 [ ) Miscellaneous hardware (other and unidentified 09 11 { including screws, car parts] Leather shoe parts 06 01 015 Unidentified leather scraps 98 O0 015 Leather personal items 07 0 015 Page Ne. 1 12/15/98 ** Context 3001.02 3001.02 02 017 Bone 3001.02 03 01 078 FLat glass 3001.02 03 02 028 Nail 3001.02 98 095 Coal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3002.02 3002.02 03 02 028 Spike 3002.02 98 095 Coal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3003.02 3003.02 01 01 004 Ironstone 3003.02 03 02 028 Nail 3003.02 04 04 002 003 Flowerpot 3003,02 98 095 Coat ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3004.02 3004.02 98 112 Coal slag ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3005.02 3005.02 03 02 078 Flat glass ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3006.02 3006.02 09 11 ** Subtotal ** 028 Corroded metal ** Context 3007.02 3007.02 02 09 089 Shell 3007.02 03 02 028 Nail 3007,02 03 02 028 Nail 3007.02 03 06 015 069 Brick ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3009.02 3009.02 01 01 001 Porcelain 3009.02 03 02 025 Nail 3009,02 98 112 Coal stag ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3010.02 3010.02 01 02 078 Container glass 3010.02 02 09 089 Shell ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3011.01 3011.01 02 09 089 Shell ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3011,02 3011.02 02 09 089 Shell 3011.02 05 02 Shotgun shell 3011.02 09 11 003 032 Bolt 3011.02 9B 112 Slag ** Subtotal ** 1 Light green 1 2 1 Cut 1 Corroded 1 2 Mend Bowl? 1 Copper alloy 0 3 6 1 REMINGTON 12 GA EXPRESS 1 0 ARTLFACT INVENTORY PECONIC LANDING TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY~ NEW YORK Reference Range Cat# 4 5 6 8 7 D 10 11 13 14 12 16 15 D 18 17 19 20 21 22 D ** Context 3012.02 3012.02 02 09 089 Shell 1 Periwinkle? 23 Page No. 2 12/15/98 Subtotal ** Context 3014.02 3014.02 03 02 028 Nails Subtotal ** ** Context 3016.02 3016.02 01 02 0?8 Container glass 3016.02 01 02 078 Bottle glass 3016.02 02 09 089 Shell 3016.02 03 01 078 Flat glass 3016.02 03 02 028 Nails 3016.02 03 06 015 069 Brick 3016.02 03 06 017 0~5 Asbestos shingles 3016.02 07 04 012 078 Mirror 3016.02 09 11 028 Oorroded metal 3016.02 98 095 Coal Context 3017.02 3017.02 02 09 089 Oyster shell 3017.02 02 09 089 Shell ** Context 3019.02 3019.02 02 09 089 Oyster shell 3019.02 02 09 089 S~ell ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3021.02 3021.02 02 09 ** Subtotal ** 089 Oyster shell ** Context 3021.03 3021.03 02 09 089 Shell ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3022.02 3022.02 02 09 089 Oyster shell 3022.02 02 09 089 S~ell ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3023.01 3023.01 02 09 089 Shell ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3023.02 3023.02 02 09 089 Oyster shell ** Context 3024.02 3024.02 02 09 ** Subtotal ** 089 Clam shell ** Context 3057.02 3057.02 01 01 004 Ironstone ** Context 3058.02 3058.02 98 ** Subtotal 128 Charcoal flecking 4 Cut 4 I Amethyst 7 13 2 3 Cut 6 3 1 2 1 39 8 7 4 11 17 1 18 ARTIFACT INVENTORY PECONIC LANDING TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Reference Range 24 3O 31 25 29 27 26 O 32 28 33 34 35 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ** Context 3061.02 3061.02 98 095 Coal 0 P Page No. 3 12/15/98 ** Context 3062.02 3062.02 98 095 Coal ** Subtotal ** Context 3063.02 3063.02 98 095 Coal ** Context 3064.02 3064.02 01 01 003 Redware 3064.02 01 01 004 Ironstone 3064~02 98 095 Coal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3066.02 3066,02 9B 095 Coal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3068.02 3068.02 01 01 004 Ironstone 3068.02 01 02 002 Stoneware 3068.02 03 02 028 Nail 3068.02 08 01 062 Tobacco pipe 306B.02 98 053 Quartz 3068.02 98 095 Coal ** Context 3069,02 3069.02 01 01 004 Ironstone 3069.02 09 11 003 028 Bolt 3069.02 09 11 028 Corroded metal ** Context 3071.02 3071.02 01 02 078 Container glass 3071.02 03 06 015 069 Brick 3071.02 98 095 Coal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3072.02 3072.02 03 06 ** SubtotaL ** 071 Concrete ** Context 3075.01 3075.01 01 02 ** Subtotal ** 078 Container glass ** Context 3083.01 3083.01 98 095 Coal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3097.02 3097.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flake? ** Context 3098.02 3098.02 01 02 ** Subtotal ** 078 Container glass ** Context 3127.02 3127.02 03 01 078 Flat glass 1 Clear.glaze interior & exterior 1 0 1 1 Brown slip interior 1 Cut 1 Stem 1 0 1 Quartz Distal fragment 1 2 Olive green 2 1 ARTIFACT iNVENTORY PECONIC LANDING TOWN OF SOUTBOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY~ NEW YORK Range Cat# 44 45 46 47 O 51 52 48 50 49 D 54 53 55 57 56 58 59 6O 61 62 63 Page No. 4 12/15/98 ontext Gp CL Mph Mat Identity ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3130.02 3130.02 09 11 008 Plastic ** Context 3142.01 3142.01 01 01 004 Ironstone 3142.01 02 09 089 Oyster shell ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3149.02 3149.02 98 095 Coal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3153.02 3153.02 03 01 078 Flat glass ** Context 3156.02 3156.02 MISSING BAG ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3158.02 3158.02 01 01 004 Ironstone ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3171.02 3171.02 03 01 078 FLat glass ** Context 3185.02 3185.02 98 053 Quartz ** Context 3187.02 3187.02 01 01 001 Porcelain bisque 3187.02 03 02 028 Na(l 3187.02 98 053 Quartz ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3189.02 3189.02 10 03 027 053 Primary flakes ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3193.02 3193.02 03 01 078 Flat glass ** Context 3196.02 3196.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flake ** Context 3200.02 3200.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes 3200.02 10 03 027 053 Primary flake ** Context 3200.03 3200,03 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes? ARTIFACT INVENTORY PECONIC LANDING TOWN OF SOUTNOLO SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Reference 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 1 1 Possible quartz flake listed on field sheet NO BAG 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 Rim Molded 1 Cut 1 3 2 Quartz 2 1 1 1 Quartz 1 13 Quartz 1 14 6 Quartz Range D 64 65 D 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 Page No. 5 12/15/98 Gp Ct Mph Mat Identity ** Context 3201.02 3201.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes ** Context 3201.03 3201.03 10 03 027 053 Primary flake ** Context 3204.01 3204.01 10 03 028 053 Secondary flake 3204.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3205.02 3205.02 98 128 Charcoal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3210.02 3210.02 02 05 017 Fish bone 3210.02 02 09 089 Shell ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3212.02 3212.02 10 03 027 053 Primary flake 3212.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3213.02 3213.02 03 0I 078 FLat glass ** Context 3215.02 3215.02 09 11 008 PLastic ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3217.02 3217.D2 98 128 Charcoal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3218.02 3218.02 01 02 078 Container glass 3218.02 03 02 028 Nail 3218.02 03 06 015 069 Brick 3218.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakea 3218.02 98 095 Coal ** Subtotal ** ~* Context 3219.01 3219.01 03 01 078 FLat glass ** Subtotal ** *~ Context 3221.02 3221.02 10 03 027 053 primary flake ~* Context 3227.02 3227.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes ~* Subtotal ** Count co~n~nts Quartz Quartz Quartz Quartz Scallop Quartz Quartz Olive green Quartz Quartz Quartz ARTIFACT INVENTORY PECONIC LANDING TO~N OF SOUTNOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Reference Range Cat# 79 80 82 81 D 84 85 87 D g 90 88 89 91 Page No. 6 12/15/98 Gp Ct Mph Hat Identity ** Context 3230.02 3230.02 01 01 004 Ironstone 3230.02 10 03 027 053 Primary flake? 3230.02 98 053 Quartz ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3232.02 3232.02 01 01 004 Ironstone ~Context 3235.02 3235.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes ** Context 3238.02 3238.02 MISSING BAG ** Context 3240.02 3240.02 10 03 030 053 Core? 3240.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes ** Subtotal ** ** Context $241.02 3241.02 02 017 Bone 3241.02 03 06 015 069 Brick 3241.02 98 095 Coal 3241.02 98 128 Charcoal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3243.02 3243.02 98 095 Coat ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3244.02 3244.02 98 095 Coal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3247.02 3247.02 01 02 078 Bottle glass 3247.02 03 06 015 069 Brick 3247.02 10 03 027 053 Primary flake ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3249.02 3249.02 03 01 078 FLat glass ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3250.02 3250.02 01 02 002 Stoneware ** Subtotal ** Count Cmments ARTIFACT INVENTORY PECONIC LANDING T[TdN OF SDUTHOLD SUFFOLK CC~JNTY~ NEW YORK Reference 1 Underglaze transfer print blue ttern 1 ~artz 8 10 1 Underglaze and overgIaze polychrome 6 Quartz 6 0 Shovel test form says 2 flakes but no bag 0 1 Quartz 4 Quartz 5 5 3 12 0 20 1 1 1 I Rim I Quartz 1 1 I Salt glazed exterior I Brown 1 1 8owl Decorated, part of beard and mustache Range Cat# 98 97 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 0 D D 106 107 I08 109 110 111 112 Page No. 7 12/15/98 Gp Cl Mph Mat Identity Context 3254.02 3254.02 04 04 078 Decorative glass ** Context 3255.02 3255.02 ** Subtotal ** MISSING gAG ** Context 3257.02 3257.02 03 05 028 025 Spigot 3257.02 98 095 Coal ** Context 3261.02 3261.02 03 06 015 069 Brick ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3268.03 3268.03 10 03 028 053 Secondary flake ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3270.02 3270.02 98 095 Coal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3273.01 3273.01 01 01 004 Ironstone ** Subtotal ** ** Context 327'5.02 3273.02 01 01 ** Subtotal ** 004 Ironstone Context 3274.01 3274.01 01 01 004 Ironstone Subtotal ** ** Context 3274.02 3274.02 MISSING gAG Subtotal ** Context 3277.02 3277.02 01 01 004 Ironstone 3277.02 01 01 004 Ironstone 3277.02 01 02 078 Container glass 3277.02 98 095 Coal ** Context 3282.02 3282.02 01 02 078 Container glass ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3285.02 3285.02 01 01 004 Ironstone 3285.02 01 02 078 Container glass 3285.02 01 02 078 Container glass 3285.02 02 09 089 Shell 3285.02 03 06 015 069 Brick 3285.02 98 053 Quartz 3285.02 98 095 Coal 3285.02 98 128 Charcoal Count Comments 1 Amethyst Paneled 1 1 Field sheet says FCR?, no bag 1 1 Cup/bowl Rim Spatterware Underglaze blue 1 I Underglaze transfer print blue 1 1 Scalloped plate rim Underglaze transfer print blue 1 1 Shove[ test form says one ceramic, no bag I 1 1 Rim 1 Black ameythyst 1 Transfer print black, no glaze Brown Light green tint ARTIFACT INVENTORY PECONIC LANDING TO~N OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Reference Range Cat# 113 114 D 115 116 117 118 119 122 123 120 121 124 129 125 127 128 126 130 132 131 Page No. 8 12/15/98 Gp CL Mph Mat identity ** Subtotal ** ** Context $289.02 $289.02 03 01 078 Flat BLass ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3299.01 3299.01 MISSING BAG ** Subtotal ** ~ Context 3299.02 3299.02 01 02 3299.02 01 02 078 Container glass 078 Bottle glass 3299.02 03 01 078 FLat glass 3299.02 03 01 078 Flat glass ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3301.02 3301.02 98 112 SLaB ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3303.02 3303.02 03 01 078 FLat glass ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3305.02 3305.02 01 02 002 Stoneware 3305.02 03 06 015 069 Brick 3305.02 09 11 028 Corroded metal 3305.02 98 128 Charcoal ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3328.02 3328.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flake? ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3356.02 3356.02 01 01 ** Subtotal ** 003 Pearlware ** Context 3369.02 3369,02 03 01 078 Flat glass ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3421.02 3421.02 01 02 013 Milk 9lass 3421.02 01 02 078 Container glass 3421.02 01 02 078 Container glass 3421.02 03 01 078 FLat glass 3421.02 04 03 019 078 Lamp glass 3421.02 98 095 Coat 3421.02 98 112 Slag ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3426.02 3426.02 01 02 ** Subtotal ** 078 Bottle BLaSs 14 Field sheet states glass, no bag No such level listed on field sheet OLive green No such Level listed on field sheet Light green tint No such Level recorded on field sheet No such Level Listed on field sheet 10 1 Salt glazed 1 3 2 7 I Quartz I 1 Underglaze handpainted blue 1 Light~reen tint Frostecl green Green tint 13 ART[FACT iNVENTORY PECONIC LANDING TO~N OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Reference Range Cat# 133 136 137 134 135 138 139 143 140 141 142 144 145 146 147 148 152 153 149 150 151 154 ** Context 3432.02 3432.02 98 053 Quartz 1 155 Page No. 9 12/15/98 ** Subtotal ** 3444.02 01 01 004 ironstone ** Context 3454.02 3454.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3465.02 3465.02 98 053 Quartz ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3479.02 3479.02 06 04 002 008 Sutton ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3485.02 3485.02 01 01 004 Ironstone 3485.02 01 02 078 Container glass 3485.02 01 02 078 Container glass ** Context 3486.02 3486.02 ** Subtotal ** 078 Recent glass ** Context 3493.02 3493.02 01 02 3493.02 01 02 078 Container glass 078 Container glass ** Context 3494.02 3494.02 09 11 028 Corroded metal ** Context 3501.02 3501.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flake? ** Context 3502.02 3502.02 03 01 078 Flat glass 3502.02 03 02 078 Nail ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3506.02 3506.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes ** Context 3509.02 3509.02 10 03 027 053 Primary flake? 3509.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flake ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3510.03 3510.03 10 03 027 053 Primary flakes? ** Context 3515.02 3515.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flake? ** Subtotal ** Count Comments ARTIFACT INVENTORY PECONIC LANDING TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Underglaze transfer print blue interior & exterior Quartz Plastic OLive green BLue Quartz Corrnded Quartz Quartz Quartz Quartz Cat# 156 157 158 D 161 159 160 D 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 Page No. 10 12/15/98 Gp Ct Mph Mat Identity Context 3516.02 3516.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes Subtotal ** *~ Context 3518.02 3518.02 10 07 081 053 Biface fragment 3518.02 98 053 Quartz ** Subtotal ** Context 3519.02 3519.02 98 053 Quartz Subtotal ** ** Context 3521.02 3521.02 10 03 027 053 Primary flakes 3521.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes ** Subtotal ** ** Context 3522.02 3522.02 03 01 078 Burnt glass 3522.02 10 03 027 053 Primary flakes 3522.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes 3522.02 98 053 Quartz ** Context 3531.02 3531.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flake ** Subtotal ** ** Context 5001.02 5001.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes 5001.02 10 03 027 055 Primary flakes? ** Subtotal ** ** Context 5001.03 5001.03 10 03 027 053 Primary flakes? 5001.03 10 05 028 055 Secondary flakes 5001.03 10 03 030 055 Core? 5001.03 10 03 030 053 Core? ** Subtotal ** ** Context 5002.02 5002.02 02 16 006 Wood 5002.02 02 16 163 Root 5002.02 10 05 027 055 Primary flakes? 5002.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes 5002.02 10 07 081 053 Biface ~* Subtotal ** ** Context 5002.03 5002.03 10 03 030 053 Core 5002.03 10 03 027 053 Primary flakes? 5002.03 10 03 030 053 Core 5002.03 10 03 02? 053 Primary flake? 5002.05 10 03 028 053 Secondary ftakes ** Subtotal ** ** Context ST5.02 ST5.02 01 02 078 Container glass 4 Quartz 4 1 Quartz 1 2 Quartz NOTHING LISTED ON SHOVEL TEST FORM 3 Quartz NOTHING LISTED ON SNOVEL TEST FORM 5 1 2 Quartz 9 Quartz 2 14 1 Quartz 1 23 Quartz 17 Quartz 4O 105 Quartz 242 Quartz 1 Quartz I Quartz 349 1 1 11 Quartz 43 Quartz 1 Quartz 57 I Quartz 48 Quartz 1 Quartz 1 Quartz 244 Quartz 295 2 BAG states CX#.ST.5.02 THIS DOES NOT MATCH Shovel Test 5 FORM WHICH ALREAOY HAS A BAG AND A D FFERENT DATE ARTIFACT INVENTORY PECONIC LANDING TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Reference Cat# 173 175 174 176 17'7 178 179 180 181 182 183 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 200 184 Page No. 11 12/15/98 Gp CL Mph Mat identity ** Subtotal ** *** Total 2 1131 ART[FACT INVENTORY PECON[C LANDING TO~N OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NE~ YORK Reference facsimile T/~A N S NI IT A L Date: Fax #: Pages: 7- P.O. 8ox Photte: (5161 765-1958 Fax~-: (516} 765~~,~6 pLANNING BOARD M[EM1]ERJ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, gR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 August11,1998 Terence G. Lewis, Sr. U.S. Retirement Communities 101Chesley Dr. Media, PA 19063-1761 Re; Proposed amended site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lewis: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 10, 1998: The final public hearing which was held at 5:40 p.m. was closed. The following resolution was adopted: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes Lead Agency, and as Lead Agency makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Conditional Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Conditional Negative Declaration for your records. Sincerely, /'/ ~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman eric. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS~ BENNETT ORLOWSK/, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS K~NNETYI L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review CONDITIONED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant August 10, 1998 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Peconic Landing at Southold SCTM#: 1000-35-1-25 Location: State Rt. 25, County Rt. 48 (Middle Road), Greenport SEQRStatus: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( x ) No() Description of Action: This application is to amend an approved site plan for construction of 118 single family detached cottages; 132 apartment units; 24 unit assisted living center; and 32 bed skilled care center with supporting amenities. Page 2 SEQR Cond~ioned Negative Declaraflon-Peconic Landing atSouthold Augu~ 10,1998 Conditions: Completion of a Phase 1B Archeological Study Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. This project is replacing a more intensive 350 unit condominium project previously approved and still pending for this site. The present plan will retain more of the vegetation and have a lower environmental impact to the site and to traffic on area roads. The Planning Board has received correspondence from the Town Trustees stating that the proposed site plan was found to be out of the Trustees jurisdiction. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation by completing a Phase 1B Archeological Study as contained in their letter dated August 5, 1998, a copy of which was given to the applicant for compliance. The impacts contained in the letter are not considered significant due to the anticipated applicant's compliance. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the NYSDOT and the required curb cut permit. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS), Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) and the Greenport Sewer Department (GSD), and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Water Authority, Greenport Sewer Department and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCWA, SCDHS, and GSD and the required relevant permits. Page 3 SEQR Conditioned Negative Declarafion-Peconic Landing atSouthold Augu~ 10,1998 For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: John P. Cahill, DEC Albany Roger Evans, DEC Stony Brook Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Dept. of Transportation Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Southold Town Building Dept. Southold Town Trustees Applicant $OUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD August 10, 199g Robert G Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Planning Board O~ce Town of $outhold Main Ro~d, 5outhold, N.Y. 11071 Re: Peconic Landing, Greenport Application De, ar Bob: Based on our meeting with the applicants and their Architect, the committee has requested two items: 1. S~nples of final color schemes for the individual "cottages" A final schedule of materials directly related to the various structures. Subject to approval of these items at a later date, we accept the balance ofthis design as submitted. If you have any questions coneemin8 this report, please contact me at my office. Respectfully submitted, Rob~n't Brown, Al,A, Co-chair ARC ~ Stra~ John B. Greene Bob Keith AU6 1998 Southold Town Planning Board AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as Peconic Landing at Southold by placing the Town's official poster notices(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on August 10, 1998. I have sent notices, by certified mail, the receipts of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the above mentioned property on August 3, 1998. Howard W. Young Your name (print) Signature 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 Address August 10, 1998 Date August 7, 1998 NOtary Public DIANE NAGENGAST Nota~ p .u~. le~New York PLEASE £ETU~N THIS AFFIDAbIT AND CEI~TIFIED MAI1 £ECEIPT$ ON TNE DAY OF. Of~ A T THE PUBLIC HEARING SCTM#: Date of Hearing: &-Io-~l~ SHEET 6 OF 1 3 SHEET ~ OF 13 ....... -'"- SHEET ~ OF 13 SHEET 2 OF 13 NEW STORMWAiI~ DEI~ON POND/WETLAND ~: BIOFILTRATION EM T __ -- II MAIN SHEET 8 OF 13 EXlS~NG ~-IU~IDS HAY 8AILE5 ROAD EXIS11NG WETLANDS ! ! ! / ! ! t SHEET 7 OF 13 SHEET 5 OF 13 SHEET 5 OF 13 SHEET 3 OF 13 ~ ' : lc LANDING : PECON i i 'AT SOU]HOLD ! F~-II I OCATI ON M Al-' SCALE: 1" = 600' (N. Y.$. RTE. 25) / f SEP 15 20UU Piannil~g Board NOTES: 5. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N o.v.D. (MSL LEGEND: SITE DATA: AR[^ OF she ~,~0~,216 sn OR ~4~770s ACRES AREA OF SCENIC EASEMENT (sou~) (NORTH) 266,085 S.F. or 6 1085 ACRES OWNER: APPLICANT: U S RETIREMENT COMMUNIZES LIFE CARE COMMUNITY PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York GENERAL LAYOUT SEE SHEET No. 4. OF 13 -*5£ 0 0 0 3 NEW POND NO, GRbUN,D WATER ~-=~3-00~+' HWM',,EL !1211 (6' RAINFALL)' i NEW W,,,A_ TENTION /WE' 'O",, I L',TR A TI O N ' (SEE EANDSCAP PLANS FO~ LIST', OF PLANTS) ¸211 SEWER O · , ~cu 8.Ol.O "OCK H~ADWALL NO. EASEM _ - TO BE REMOVED - =:4 ¢ ,~ ~.~ ' C.O. NO.3 & AIR SANH=AR.y s , ,~- ,, - , · E: MAlt~,I , ~--~-- __ , I: I _1 ~o VEGETATION TO REMAIN ~- BE REMOVED , ~---{- T = 20.0Q · -": [' ::NEW SIGN 1§1 ,."¢-~" ? NEW BOND --~ ', WATER SURFACE EL=12.00 LINE WITH,t2~-O''COMPAeTED /' . TOPSOIL OR~ CLAY 214 ROCK DAM TOP EL=15,00 -- _~_:.~LIMIT OF NE WETLANDS ,/ ,,--t~ NO. 5-' 3 101 CD~Y 2O8 NOTE: BRECKNOC~I~ ALL, ~TS ASSOCt.~ ~,'AND THE LARGE:~,gDOD FITAbIE ACCOR~E~ANCE WITH~, ltHE OFFICER HISTOF(~ PRESERVA[rlON, · 194 205 t., · ~' WIDE"×-8~ HiGH 0 Z bJ SEE SHEET No. 8 OF 1.3 Young & Young, Land Surveyors KEY TO EXISTING TREE SPECIES: IKEYI BOTANICAL NAME I COMMON NAME j OA QUERCUS ALBA WHIll~ OAK SF SAUX FRAGILIS CRACK WILLOW PA PICEA ABIES NORWAY SPRUCE FG FAGUS DRANDIFOUA AMERICAN BEECH RP ROBINIA PSEUDO~,CACIA BLACK LOCUST EA EUQNYMU~ ALA~JS WINGED EUONYMUS PP PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO SLUE SPRUCE PH PL&TANUS x HYBRIDA LONDON PLANE-TREE CF CORNUS FLORIDA FLOWERING DOGWOOD JN JUGLANS NIGRA BLACK WALNUT MA MORUS ALBA WHITE MULBERRY LT LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP TREE AP ACER PLATANOtDES NORWAY MAPLE PS PBUNUS SERRULATA ORIENTAL CHERRY MS MAGNOLIA SOULANGEANA SAUCER MAGNOLIA AS ACER PSEUDOPLATANUS SYCAMORE MAPLE PL POPULUS ALBA WHITE POPLAR HC HALESIA CAROUNA CAROLINA SILVERBALL AH AESCULUS HIPPOCASTANUM HORSE CHESTNUT SP PRUNUS BP. FLOWERING PLUM BS BUXUS SEMPERVIRENS BOXWOOD (SHRUB) UA ULMUS AMERICANA AMERICAN ELM CT CARYA TOMENTOSA MOCKERNUT HICKORY AC ACER SACCHARINUM SILVER MAPLE SD SALIX DISCOLOR PUSSY WILLOW (SHRUB) RC RHAMNUS CATHARTICA EUROPEAN BUCKTHORN PE PRUNUS BERO~NA WtLD BLACK CHERRY PV PRUNUS A'CUM MAZZARD CHERRY ? UNKNOWN ORNAMENTAL LIFE CARE COMMUNITY PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk Coun(y, New York Surf. Co. Tox Mop: i 1000 ~ 55 i 1 ~ 25 SITE PLAN DATE SCALE JOB NO. SHEET NO. SEP. 6, 2000 NOV. 24, 1998 AUG 24, 1998 JUNE 29, 1998 MAY 19, 1998 SEPT. 17, 1997 : SEPT 4, 1997 SEE SHEET N0. 4 OF 13 1 & = 30" ROAD '-XISTING, PPLY, FA( 22¸7 · 2¢4 CONCRETE BUILDING W W '1- W W EW, 4 SANITARY", ,,S,EWE~R FORCE MAIN WATER 246 \ 155 1,55 !5- 0 0 0 "-fSUMP STATION .-' 26¸9 NCB 8.03,0, T= SEE SHEET NO. 5 OF 15 2.03,0 T ~ 21.56 I - 1737 N,S I = 12.20 E,W / · 232 < W NMH 8.02,0 £i 2 NEW ~IGN IN TO LILCO #51 ELEC., TEL,, '~ CATV. 2J.o0 -? TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED :ONCRETE 1.04,0 25- . SI 4 2F GAS MA~N ' ¸ii IN TO-]EXISTING ---~ ~ = "- - ~ / / / / / Young & Young, Land Surveyors 400 Os~;ra~ad~r Avenwe, l~iverhead, New York 11901 $ I 6- 727A2303 LIFE CARE COMMUNITY PECONIC LANDING AT SOUI'HOLD At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York Suff. co. Tox Mop: i 1000 i 35 i I r 25 SI Ti PLAN SEP, 6. 2000 NOV. 24, 1998 AUG. 24. 1998 JUNE 29, 1998 MAY 19. 1998 SEPT. ~7. 1997 DATE ,SEPT. 4.1997 SCALE :1" = 40' JOB NO. ,97-290 9HEET NO 3 OF 13 SEE SHEET No. 8 OF 13 . / 0 Z At: G~ENPO~T Town of: SOgTHOLD SEE SHEET No 2 OF 13 SEE SHEET No. 3 SEP. ~ ~ . . ...... . . = ,. ..: . _- . .. . . . ., . ~ -' SEE SHEET No. 7 OF 13 _. ~ 1 '- C~ , ~ ' / ~ '. ~ ,' ~'~ - / "'" / ( --%~',, ', ~X { i~;' , : [', ..... ~. ff~ / ,/b: ~%1~5~!/ ;~/~:- /; At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD , ,' . - .~ / - SITE PLAN SEE SHEET No. 3 OF 13 ~-~"~ ~' ~, LIFE CARl:' COMMUNITY PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York SITE PLAN NOV. 24, 1998 SHEET N(1 :6 OF I3 ~ N 64'3 E 165.50' - ........ 0 ......... 'NEW',E~'~ ',M/F ~',GAZEBO ~ ~ --- ~ " ,,.~.,~_...,_ ,,, , , ,- SEE SHEET No. ~ OF 13 0 Z W W ,r I RRM ZONE~9 .... (.~..t~. D NOTES LIMIT OF -- WETLANDS EXISTING ,WETLANDS 1. ALL PEDESTRIAN PATHS WITHIN 100 FEET WETLANDS SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 FEET IN AND SHALL BE SURFACED WITH WOOD CHIPS AND/OR OTHER SURFACE MATERIAL APPROVED BY THE N.Y.S. D(_PARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ', CON SERVATI'O~. 2. ALL BARE EARTH ADJ:A:CENT TO THE PROPOSED WOOD CHIP PEDESTRIAN PATHS WITHIN 100 FEET OF WETBANDS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH WlLDFLOWER MIX. 3. FRESHWATER WETLAND BOUNDARY AS FLAGGED BY JEFFREY SEEMAN OF COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. AND APPROVED BY NYSDEC ON 4-7-98, "'"" ' %' RETAINING 0 x 37: '~'F EL= × j r T = 28,75 r = 24,25 '7'g 15 W W ¢2 SEE SHEET No. 5 OF 13 ABE GAZEBO "76 X 3 NSMH 2,15.0 \ OF 18"¢ HDPE PIPE @ 2 40% x 5,$ 6 b /c~ o 331 359 · Z49 LIFE CARE COMMUNITY PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York Suff. Co. 'Tax Map; r 1000 i 35 ~ 1 i 25 SITE PLAN NOV. 2~ 1998 AUG. 2~ 1998 MAY lg, 1998 SEP% 17, 1997 DATE :SEPT· 4. 1997 SCALE :1" = JO0 NO. :97-290 "970290SPF,DWG" .I NEW 4" SANITARY 'SEWER FORCE MAIN 7 KNA?P ?LAQP, OH AM P LIN BRIDGE. SEWER MANHOLE #185 RIM--15.49 IE=8.89 N/E IE=7.29 E IE=7.29 S SEWER MANHOLE #184 RIM=9.66 IE=4.26 N b/ON S L-L- I I I LIFE CARE: COMMUNITY PECONIC LANDING AT SOUI'HOLD At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York Suff. Co, Tax Mep: ~ 1000 ~ 35 ~ 1 i 25 SITE PLAN NOW 2~ 1998 AUG. 2~ 1998 DATE :JUNE 29, 1996 SCALE :1* = 40' JOB NO. :97-290 SHEET NO. :8 OF 15 now or - , d B=LLATE"AL A=ENT ~XT ~'S SORRY WAS P"EPA"EO IN I f LIFE CARE COMMUNITY At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Surf. Co. Iox Mop: ~ BOUNDARY SURVEY LIFE CARE COMMUNITY PECONIC LANDING AT SOU OLD At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York STATE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN OCT. 15, 1998 cNE~ STOP ~IGN t · 1,0'~X~- ~d ~ REMO~ ~S~NG PA~M~T ~ NEW A~T , ' ~~/ / . )_ . = NEW ASPH~T PA~ENT ~ l~ S~IP t~DRANT ~ j ...... - ..... ~ ~0E ~ SOLID WH~rE LiNE F--Z-- eB I REMO~ ~S~NO EW STOP BA~ ~ .... GM ...... - EST INERSEC~ON [TAIL EAST INERSEC~ON DETAIL --.~ r ~S~N0~,~ ' I '. " ..... - .- ~ NEW ~ ~O~?~_ / r~ ~3 ' '/' '- " r 70' ," I~ ,,, ..... _ ----- .~?~s~o~ sm~g, , ~' , ,l ,' ,"~ m ~' ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DASHED ~OW UNE ~,o ,,~,~, PLAN-MAIN ROAD (N.Y.S. RE 25) F////////// ///////////////////////~; I~ 18~3.1735 - 1 1/2" TOP ~N~ ~N~N~N~N~31 I~ 18~3.1335 - 1 1/2" BINDER PAYMENT CONS~UC~ON DETAIL -- '--' (~IN N Y.S RIGHT OF WAY SOU~ SIDE) "' ~ " ' -SA~UT E: ED~ OF PA~M~T ' J -- BEGIN NEW CONCRE~ CURB ' '--' I~ 10609.2801 SIDEWA~ 0 ~ ~--~ ~ ....... - ............................. ' SLOPE , ','' . · . ,, , ,. ~ ~~ ---~ I~ 18~3.1338 - 1 1/2' BIND~ CURB, SIDEWALK & PAYMENT CONS~UC~ON DETAIL PLAN-MAIN ROAD (N.Y.S. RE 25) (~lN N.Y.S. BGHI OF W~Y-NOR~ SIDE) ~: ~"=~' 5t6-727-2303 SECTION A-A SECTION B-B NEW POND , . / .,- -::,,. __~ ~ ~ ..... POND SECTION ~ HEADWALL PLAN SECTION C-C ~ 4'~ ~ CONCRE~ CAP EARTHEN & ROCK WEIR ' ' WA~ N0. 1 2 3 4 9 I 10 11 12 13 C0NCRE~CAP CONCRETE RETAINING WALL ~ LIFE CARE COMMUNITY -~,. ....... ., .~,~. ,..,-,.~--~-,~--~.,~., ,,. ,-.~,..-.~-. -,~-..-~,.~..--~-..., ..., .. .. . .... . ~.,~,,,-~-. ~ ~--PECONIC LANDING AT SOU~OLD - .N,~7~N~y,N~. k~. ' ~ ~N PIPE ARCH At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD 7'-~1" 5'-7" Suffolk County, New York ROAD WALL NO. 1 2 3 4- 9 10 11 12 13 hw (ft) 1(3 10 8 8 9 8 8 8 12 W (~n) 120 120 96 96 62 56 56 56 144 ROA~SECTION FIRE LANE X _ ~2~/~%~ ~ ~ __ ~ WHATLEY-IO~ SERIES NORFOLK BASE, STORM WATER LEACH'~NG POOL CONCRETE HEADER ~- WALK PEDESTRIAN LIGHT PLAN PLAN PLAN ~ ~ ', T~ENT OF FRAME ~ AD'd~ENT 0F FRAME ALLOW ~" FOR FINAL ~ ~ ,.-- PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRE~ BOX -- ~l -- PRECAST REINFORCEB CONCRE~ BOX ~ · PECONIC LANDING SOUTHOLD 1. WA~ REINFORCEMENT ~ NOT 8E REQUlR~ TO A 1. WA~ REINFORCEMENT ~LL NOT BE REQUIRED TO A At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD SECTION 4. ALL CONCR~ TO BE ~00 PS[ AT 28 DA~. SECTION ~ *~ coNc,~ =o aB 4000 ,s, ,~ =~ D,~. SECTION Suff. Co. Tox Mop: i 1000 ~ 35 m 1 ~ 25 ROAD & DRAINAGE DETAILS CATCH BASIN--2x2 FLUSH GRATE CATCH BASIN--2x4 FLUSH GRATE STORM WATER MANHOLE SHEET 3 OF i~ I I ROAD .J LO(., r~ TI ON MAP PIan~in[iBoard PECONIC LANDING AT SOUllt01D GENERAL LAYOUT [~PROOM 2 ~AIH 2 I~I?ROOM I PININ~i ROOM PORCH / ~NmY ~I~AI' ROOM KIfCH~N .... ~-ROOF ?lR~f PLOOR PL.AN ~/q.[~ I/~.,~-I'.~)'' OVERHANG I~PI~OOM ~ ~PROOM ~' - DOWNI I~PROOM ~ ~CONP' PL. OOR PL,q',I ,5C/~1~ I/~J"-'l'-O" DRAWN BY MPP APPROVED BY DATE SCALE I/~."..1'.0 DRAWING iii i i ,50UTH ~bBVAflON ~A51' ~bl~VAflON ¢¢~ V 4"-1'42" NORII-I BF~VAIlON A5 l~Ulbl' ~F~VAflON5 DRAWN BY APPROVED BY Q DATE SCALE DR/ _% % "- ~,,IE~ SUB:'B't ~, ,' Areo--237,6£ ," ~,~,~.' DB-BASIN A Areo=.5,65,000 S.F.'" ;IN Are~o~463,700~., S,F, BASIN d 77,900 S,F, --DRAIN'AGE BAS'IN "~: - -. DI ./ (N.Y.S. ROAD b/lAIN 25) RTE Young & Young, Land Surveyors LIFE CARE COMMUNITY PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York Suff. Co. Tox Mep: i lOOO ~ 35 , 1 ~ 25 HYDROLOGICAL ASSESSMENT MAP DATE :JUNE 8, 1998 SCALE :f' = 100' JOB NO, 97-0290 SHEET NO. :1 OF 1 HYDRO. DWO ~~~- --: - ,, ~ , ,, ~ ', ,, ,, ,, ',',~ , ,, ~ ,' ,' / '-: ", ~, -, RANGE SITE COVERAGE ' ~ BE.INNIN,, END PECONIC LANDING AT SOU OLD ~ ~ 0.00 ~ ' 10.00 ~ 120.5550 8&28 ~ ' ' At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD ~ ,~ ~: .~ ~ Suffolk County, New York ~ 500 % - 15.0482 10.39 % Surf. Co. Tox Mop: , lOO0 ,,,,. . , , . , , , ,,, _, > . ~ SLOPE ANALYSIS MAP '~ ~UIL SLOPE ANALYSIS CREATED USIN~ ACAD VI~/SOFTD~SK 8,0 AEC SOLUTIONS. ~ ~OB -- o .,,,~'~_.---¢~ .- --;J .... b ., -.---- - _ .,-, , --.~'. -I ~ -' ~ ,' Young & Young, £and Surueyors ( ~.~..~., ] / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~",,'/~ ', ~:~ ', ~' N ,' , , ?~-:~:-~z~ '~ ~ L ~','~,',, ~ ~ ~ ,' ~// ~- / ~ x ~ / '~,'~',',, :,, ~',., ,, ,, , , , ~,~, ,, ' ' .- ~,, ',~' , , . - ~_::~.- - / ~ , "--.-. ~ , N ., ~,",',,', , ,'/..',.:,, , ~ t ',, ~ ', ~/ if ~ , ~ ~..- ... ~ ~ ~ ,,, ~ ~ _ ,~ ~:~.'" , .,., , ~,~ , ,..~ .~. ..... .. . ._. ~:y' ; 1~ / ~ ~,, ,, ~ _ ~, ',,,~ ,~ ', ', .',,~ ,, ,,,' , . >- --. ,, , ', ', ~, ,, ,, ,',,, ~ ' , ,~ : ', ~ / / ,.. ~,~ ....... .~" -~-v. ~ ~ .... ~ ~- .--. . . , .... ~ ...... ' ' . ........ . ' / ...... '- ' / '"/ ''2 [ - ' , ~ ~ . , .. / -/ ,, ~,,f ,, ~, ,.. , , , ~ f . ,, , , · ,, ,. .. ~, ~ , . ~ ,,, ,v ~ ~'~,. ,, ,' .- ' ' ', ,,. , , /c, . ..,,, . ; - . l,,~,/,,,, . .. ___, ,f~,r[~, ,, "' ' ~,,' - / , "%, , ./ %',, , '. ,,, ',, ,, , '~ , , ' ,'"; ~ , ~ ~,, ,,, ,1 ~ ". ~ ~ , ~'-. ~' ~ '~'~.:~ , , -. ,' , ~: ~ ' , '" ~ ~ ', · ~-''; I -. ',, x. . ~, . , . . ,,~, ,,, ..,, ,. ,, .. :.:.~' ,, ,: .~.,,,'., ,,.~ ..,, .. ., , ,, ,/::/,. ', , .. ~ [ ,.. /'--'/~v ', '~ , ~', ', ~', W~, ~,, ,~ -', ~ _.,__,, / )..,,:~,..~.. ...~d. ,-.', ~, ~ ., ,, .,.,,,, . ,,,:~:.:,,,,,,,~ , /,: ~~<~-..,-- . , : ~ ~ ~ "' x, , ~ ._ . ,..~ ~,.~~ . ..,, . ., _ , , ,,..~- , ,, ,, ... ,, -- ~,,~ ~ ~ .'% .~ ~., ~v ..~~.. ~~~ "' ~ -~ ' ~ '~ "' ~'~ "' 'I" _J I ,' ' W" , ;', '~ '.- /.~d-C ..i~ ..-.: .---~, ~~~ ~-,. ::..,. ~ ~b,',' '~ ~, , , X / ~ ',~5,,-~ ~~.. I']_L "; ;~~~ ~ ...... ~ ...... ~ ' ' "" "'"'< "'!:?' '"'~- / ~ ~.~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ?:~' "' ' " ' ~ -- '. ~ "', ~" '~ "' .... ' '"'""' -~ "' '~" "' "" "~'"" '"'" "~'" ' -' ' PECONIC LANDIN6A~-' SOU~OLD ',> ', ~ , ' "',,,,,- ' ........ , -s , ,~ , ~ -~ , ~ /~:~x~-. .... ~ ~ ' ' , '." . ' · ' --'" ' At: GREENPORT Town of: SOUTHOLD ',, ,, ~,,,~,,'~' ,, ,,, ,~ , ' "'~.." ' ~.. , ~ , - -~," :7 ~,:~: -- ~,~, .~ ~ . · ~ ~ ~ ~-~>. ~. ~~ ' ~1~ :~ ~J ,, Suffolk County, New York .',, ,~,',~, ~ ,, ~, , , , ,~._ . ,,. .... ,, ~ .. {,,-~,,~, , ,, . ~~M ~ "~~2,~1-.~ - ~ i':' surf, C~. T~ ..,~ . . . , ~ , · ......... ~ ~::~ ... ,, ... ~:,.%/?' , .. __ _ ~., ~ ~, ~. N~ ~~ ~ EXlS~NG ~GETA~ON MAP ._ , , /,..._.., ,. ,,, :,,,, . ,,,, ..... , ,. , , X~.~ ,, ~,~,~ '~d,, ~ , ,, ., ..__. . , ~~: ~1~-- .~ ~ . ,, '~Z ~ ~/ C~,/' ~, ~/,' ,~' ,',',' __.-.- f, ,,' , - -,' _.~ ,.¢C__--/-,~ ~ : ~ .,,'~/ , ~,(. 'h ~ , ,~,' ~ .... " ~ ,,,. '-,, , ,, ' . ' ",~-'~ '~' , (N ) ,, MI A IN ROAD, . Y.S. RTE 25 ! CONCRETE SLAB FRAME · COVER THREADED PLUS SPADE 4" PLUG WITH 2" TAP 4" C.LDJ, CLEANOUT RISER -- 4" PLUS WITH 2" TAP 4" C.L.D,I. CLEANOUT RISER 4" A5' SEND WITH WEDGE ACTION RETAINER GLANDS GRAVEL BASE 2" BALL VALVE {SET TOP Of VALVE §" BELOW GRADE) 2" THREADED NIPPLE -- A"WYE WITH WEDGE ACTION RETAINER GLANDS AND CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK 4" C.L,D.L FORCE MAIN 4" 90' BEND WITH WEDSE ACTION RETAtNER SLANDS --CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK & ENCASEMENT INLINE FLUSHING CLEANOUT INLET -- CONSTRUCT ALL CONCRETE iNVERTS OUTLET UNPAVED AREAS PAVED AREAS 4" MOUND AROUND FRAME FINAL GRADE MORTAR FROSTPROOFINS-- ,IN,, B" MAX. (AT TOP OF CONE ONLY) C.L FRAME & LOCKING, AOJUSTABLE WATERFR00F AND IN~ECT PROOF COVER, CAMPBELL FOUNDRY RAT. NO. 1452D, OR EQUAL ADJUST T0 GRADE, 12" MAX. HEIGHT, 8''l WIDE, 4,000 PSI PRECAST, REINFORCED CONCRETE, ECCENTRIC CONE ALUMINUM MANHOLE RUNGS, WASHINGTBN ALUMINUM C0. F-14-2A, OR EQUAL. LOCATE TOP RUNG AS CLOSE AS PRACTICABLE 70 TOP OF' MANHOLE LOCATE BOTTOM RUNG 18" MAX. -- FROM SOLID FOOTrNS PRECAST MANHOLE SASE IN EVEN FOOT INCREMENTS, AS REQUIRED 0 6T MIN 12" E.W, 5,00' '*BUTYL TlTE", "KENT SEAL", OR EQUAL (TYP. ALL RING JOINTS) MASTIC J0fNT SEALANT INTEGRAL RUBBER BOOT ~TYP.) STAINLESS STEEL, TISHTENiNG DEWOE (TYP.) LOCATE JOINT @ 12" MIN., 1S" MAX, (TYP* ALL PIPES) GRAVEL BASE POURED CONCRETE INVERT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ,ISTURBED SOIL VERTICAL DEFLECTION I 45' 3'-0" 2'-O" 3'-O" UNDISTURBED SOIL PLAN BITUMINOUS COATED 1/2"¢ STEEL RESTRAINING ANCHOR ROADS (2-REQUIRED PETE THRUST BLOCK THRUST BLOCK ~ UNDISTURBED SOIL SECTION THRUST BLOCK 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER ¢5' PVC WYE PLAN HORIZONTAL DEFLECTION =9I 1,-s. 11,-2,, [ l'-B" 4-5' 2'-6" 1'-4" 1'-8" BO'f 5'-o" / B'-0" I l'-B" I ELEVATION THRUST BLOCKING b UNDrSTURSED SOrL SECTION THRUST BLOCK DIA. CONCRETE SLAB FRAME A COVER FINISHED GRADE GRAVEL BASE -- 2" BALL VALVE (SET TOP OF VALVE 9" BELOW GRADE) 2" THREADED NIPPLE 4" WYE WITH WEDGE ACTION RETAINER SLANDS AND CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK FLOW 4" C.L.D,I, FORCE MAIN SECTION -- CONCRETE ENCASEMENT CONCRETE ENCASEMENT HORIZONTAL SECTION ~CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING 4" WYE WITH WEDGE ACTION RETAINER GLANDS FLOW WYE BEND CLEANOUT ALLOW 3" FOR FINAL~ ADJ~MeNL:FFRAME~ / C,I, FRAME & LOCKING, ADJUSTABLE WATERPROOF AND INSECT PROOF F COVER, CAMPBELL FOUNDRY PAT. NO. 1452D~ OR EQUAL FINISHED SRADE REINFORCED CONCRETE TRAFFIC TOP PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE RING 'SALVINIZED TITE", "KENT SEAL", OR EQUAL (TYP, Of ALL PINS JOINTS) JR/VAOUUM RELIEF VALVE CLAMP 2" NPT 6" OR 8" C,L.D.I. FORCE MAIN T MANHOLE SASE IN EVEN FOOT INCREMENTS, AS REQUIRED #4 0 12" EW. SRAVEL BASE AIR RELIEF CHAMBER 7 00' --ACCESS OPENINS ACCESS OPENING-- PLAN 67' ALUM. 7,00' LEAF ACCESS DOOR DUAL DOOR 2" DIA. ALUMINIUM GUIDE RAILS WITH BREAKAWAY FITTINGS LIFTING CHAINS S.S, FLOAT SWITCH (TYP.) (CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC MODEL 9S) SANITARY SEWER SrON tM P - j STA, TION · ELEV 17,92 -rNV, eLE% 10,38 - H.W, ALARM ELEV, 9,50 - 2nd PUMP ON ELEV, 8.75 - 1st PUMP ON ELEV. 8,00 · ALL PUMPS OFF ELBV, 6,75 1" DIA, SCH. 40 S.S. ROD · ELEV, 3.25 S" PVC BUILDING CONNECTION 50' BEND SO' BEND VARIES 6" CLSP STUB AT BUILDINS FLOW PRESSURE TO MANHOLE) WATER MAIN OR WATER SERVICE FINISHED GRADE SECTION 4000 PSI CONCRETE HOUSE CONNECTION [I I ~NITARY SEWER WA MAIN WATER MArN OR WATER SERVICE SANITARY SEWER CROSSOVER GENERAL NOTES 10, 11. 12. 13, NO PHYSICAL WORK MAY PROCEED ON SiTE FROM THE ENGINEER. SAID N'GTIOE Will BE PACT DOCUMENTS BY THE REGULATORY AGENCIES. WiTHiN TEN (10) DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE TO PROCEED, TO THE ENGINEER: A) PROSRESS SCHEDULE B) SHOP DRAWING SCHEDULE C) SCHEDULE OF VALUES D) CERTIFICATE Of INSURANCE E) EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE TO PROCEED, CONFERENCE SHALL BE HELD AT THE OFFICES OF SCDHS. A) CONTRACTOR B) EN01NEER O) OWNER D) SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENTOF HEALTH SERVICES E) ~LLAGE OF OREENPORT UNTIL RECEiPt OF NOTICE TO PROCEED IS RECEIVED ISSUED IMMEDIATELY UPON APPROVAL OF THE CONT-- CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ~ PRECONSTRUCTION THIS CONFERENCE WILL BE ATTENDED BY: CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR UTILITY MARKOUTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK AT THE SITE. ALL MARKOUTS SH~LL BE PLOTTED ON RECORD DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTrFY ENGrNEER AND REGULATORy AGENCIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS iN ADVANCE OF THE START OF PHYSICAL CONSTRtJCTJON. A NOTICE OF 72 HOURS SHALL ALSO BE REQUIRED WHEN CONSTRUCTION ~ESUMES AFTER A TEMPORARY SHUTDOWN, SEE SECTION 01010. OF THE SPECJFICATIONS. IN CASE OF CONFLICT BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, OR LOCAL CODES, REQUIREMENTS AND ORDINANCES, THE STRICTERrOF THE REQUIREMENTS SHALL GOVERN. PRIOR TO BACKFILLING, INSTALLED SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES AND MAINS SHALL BE JNSPECTED AND AUTHORIZED FOR BACKFILLING BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THOSE AGENCIES RAVING JURISD- ICTION. SAID AGENCIES SHA'LL BE NOTIFieD AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF SCHEDULED BACKFILLING. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINWTE AND SCHEDULE ALL WORK WITH THE WORK OF OTHER CONTRACTORS ENGAGED ON ~HE PROJECT. NO WORK SHALL BEGIN U~TIL SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE APPLICABLE PORTION OF THE WORK HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO; AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND REGULATORy AGENCIES. SEE SPECIFICATIONS SECTION O1500. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINiFAIN ALL RECORD DOCUMENTS ON SrTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL CONDITIONS (PARAGRAPH 6.19) AND SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 01720. A CURRENT PROGRESS SCHEDULE SHALL BE POSTED AT ALL TIMES IN AN ACCESSIBLE LOCATION IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH SECTIONS O14-20 AN[~ O1BOO. iN CASE OF DISCREPANCY BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS~ GO~TRACTOR SHALL NOTIFy ENGINEER AND REQUEST OLARIFICATrONS or INTERPRETATIONS BEFORE E~ROCEEDING Wr'TFH AFFECTED WORK. NO VARIATIONS FROM THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SH~LL E PERMITTED WFLTHOUT AN APPROPRIATE CHANGE ORDER PREP- ARED BY THE ENGINEER, ,APPROVED BY THE REGULATORy AGENCIES AND SIGNED BY THE OWNER. FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WO~ SHALL NOT DIE GRANTED. UNTIL ALL OF THE FOLLOWING COND- ITIONS ARE MET: A) ALL REQUIRED SHDP DRAWrNGS AND SUBMITTALS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AND AP-- PROVED BY THE ~NGiNEER AND REQULATORY AGENCIES. B) ALL RECORD DOCUHENTS JNCLUDING AS--BUILT PLANS, CERTrFICATIONS AND OWNER'S / OPERATOR'S SHO~ D~AWING SETS H'AVE BEEN RECEIVED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. C) ALL MATERIAL, OPERATIONAL AND PERFORMANCE TESTING HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN THE PRESENCE OFRE~UIRED PARTIES, AND APPROPRIATE TEST REPORTS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO ANg ACCEPTED BY THE ENGINEER AND REGULATORY AGENCIES. D) CERTIFICATES OF COMBLIANCE HAVE BEEN SUBM TTED ASSERTING THAT T BEEN PERFORMED N ~sCCORDANDE HE WORK HAS WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOC- UMENTS. CERTrFIGAT SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY EACH CONTRACTOR AND SUBCON--' TRACTOR ENGAGED, IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK, AND SHALL BE SIGNED BY AN AUTHORIZED OFF-lAir GF EACH CONTRACTOR / SUBCONTRACTOR AS WELL AS A NEW YORK STATE NOT ¥ PUBLIC. it SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONDUCT HIS WORK IN A SAFE AND NON-- HAZARDOUS MANNER. TH( CDNTRAOTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY E THAT THE SITE AND FACILITIES ARE MAI T FFORTS TO iNSURE EMPLOYEES, ENGINEER AND NAINED IN A SAFE CONDgTfON, POSING NO HAZARD TO ............ rEGULATORy PERSONNEL WITH AUTHORIZED ACCESS TO THE SITE AND lmm. I~-~IULN/~ OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. SEE GENERAL COND TIONS PAR AND 6.2~) AS WELL ASI SPECIFICATIONS SECTION OIBOO: AGRAPH NOS. 6.20 WASTEWATER COLLE DTION SYSTEM NOTEs APPROVED EQUAL, NLESS ~R CTER REQUIREMENTS ARE STIPULATED FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS. INSTALL WITH PE BELL AT UPSTREAM (HrGHER) END OF PIPE. COMPLY WITH SUFFOLK COUNTh TEMS FOR OTHER THAN SINGLE ED FOR OTHERWISE IN THE coA PROVIDE CLASS % HAUNCHING STANDARDS For SUB--SURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYS-- 'AMILY RESIDENCES, EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFiCALLy PROVJD-- RAOT DOCUMENTS. RD CLASS %' BACKFILL PEr UNI--BELL SPECS IN ALL PIPE TRENCHES. COMPACT TO 95~ IODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY, IN 8" MAX. LIFTS. BACKFILL REMAINDER OF TRENCH TO GE% DENSITY IN UNPAVED AREAS, AND TO 95% IN PAVED AREAS. ALL MANHOLES AND COVERS SHArL BE DEsrGNED FOR R--20 WHEEL LOADINGS. ALL HOUSE CONNECTIONS SHALL~E 6" SDR--.~B PVC AT 2~ MINIMUM SLOPE. INLiNE CLEAN- OUTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT?B FOOT INTERVALS AND AT ALL BENDS ON LONG HOUSE CONNECTIONS. WHERE WATER LINES CROSS SEVERS, HOUSE CONNECTIONS AND / OR STORM BRAINS, A SEPARATION OF 18"' VErTICALL' SHALL BE ACHIEVED. IF THE WATER MAIN IS BELOW THE SEWER, THEN AWWA 0--900 PfC WATER PIPE SHALL BE USED FOR THE SEWER MAIN. USE FULL (20') LENGTHS FOR B(TH PIPES AT CROSSINGS AND rNSTALL SUCH THAT CROSSING IS AT MIDPOINT OF EACH PIPE. ~ROVIOE 10' MINIMUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN PAR- ALLEL SEWER, WATER AND DRAINkGE LINES. MANHOLES SHALL MEET ASTM 0¢8, EXCEPT AS SUPERSEDED BY THE DETAILS ON THIS GWB, PRECAST CONCRETE SHALL BE4-,OOO PSI. SHOP DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO BE STAMPED BY A PROFESSIONAL ~NGINEER, LICENSED IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AND ARE TO CONTAIN COMPLETE INFORM\TION NECESSARy FOR THE FABRICATION AND INSTALL- ATION OF THE PRECAST CONOlEtE UNITS. CAST--IN--PLACE CONCRETE TOBE B, BQO PSI. ALL REINFORCING TO BE ASTM A--B15, GRADE 60. ALL WELDED WlREIFABRiC TO BE ASTM 185. ALL CONCRETE FORMS TO BE OILED,PRIOR TO POUR AND REMOVED. FINISHED WALLS TO HAVE CLEAN SURFACES AND MUST BE FREE OFANY SPLINTERS AND~ PROTRUSIONS. ALL LIFTING MOLES TO BE PROPERU MORTARED FLUSH TO WALLS. PROVIDE RESTRAINED dOINT OOUPLI~S ON ALL PIPES WITHI SLOPES GREATER THAN 10 %. t SPRING LINE UNDERGROUND MARKER TAPE, 6" WIDE, 0,04" THICK METALLIC TYPE, GREEN COLOR WITH THE WORDS "CAUTION - BURIED SEWER LINE BELOW", INSTALLED 18" BELOW GRADE (SETON NAMEPLATE CO. CATALOG NO, B7228), SHEETING AS REQUIRED --FINAL BACKFILL. COMPACT T0 (TO 95% IN PAVEMENT AREAS) TRENCH WALLS MAY BE SLOPED ABOVE TOP OF PIPE, AT CONTRACTOR'S OPTION, % INITIAL BACKFILL. COMPACT TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY. E HAUNCHING, COMPACTED TO UrN, 95~ MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY. SANITARY SEWER TRENCH 400 O8~de~ A~e~e, ~e~Ae~d, Ne~ Yo~k 11901 516-727-2303 LIFE CARE COMMUNITY PECONIC LANDING AT SOUfHOLD At: GREENPORT - Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York Surf. Co, Tqx Mop; , 1000 r SB i 1 I 25 SANITARY SEWER DETAILS NOV. 24, 1998 DATE :OCT, 23,1998 SCALE :N.T.S dOB NO. :97-290 97290DET OF 13 RtDGE OFF~CE (516) 92.9 2860 (TEL) NAYLOI~ ENGINEEF-.ING (5~6) ~ 2~5~ LONG POND gOAD HOLTGVI~LEOFFICE (51G)75g~0355 (TEL) glD(.~E, LON(~ ISLAND 11901-1g, gg, HUNTINGTON OFFICE (51~) ~9 ~7~ (TEL) (516) ~9 4~4 (F~) CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT regarding the PROPOSED PUMPING STATION AND FORCE MAIN from the PECONIC LANDING LIFE CARE COMMUNITY to the VILLAGE OF GREENPORT 5EWER DISTRICT TOWN OF 50U~OLDi SUFFOLK COUNTYm NEW YORK Made to: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Village of Greenpor~ U,5, Retirement Communities Young an& Young Planning, En~lneerln~,j and Lan& 5urve~in0 Submit, tea - June 0§, 199~ NAYLOR. ENGINEERING ~ LONG POND ROAD RIDGE, LONG 15LAND 11901-1828 EigOE OFFICF (51©) 9'29 2~.~60 ('~t) (516) 929 2&59 (FAX) HOi fSVIII F OFFI(E (51(-~ ~x, 035~ (TF/~ INTERNET 72662~144~COM PU SE RVE.COM june 05, 1998 Suffolk County Department of Health Services County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 Attn: John Donovan, P.E. Public Health Engineer Rc; Conceptual Engineering Report Proposed Sewer Extension Peconic Landing at Southold Dear Mr. Donovan: Attached. please find the conceptual engineering report for proposed 60,000 GPD sewer service from the Peconic Landing Life Care Community north of Route 25 in Southold, Long Island to the Village of Greenport Sewer District, Manhole # 185. As you will note in the report, Peconic Landing has been given a commitment by the Greenport Sewer District for disposal of up to 288,000 GPD in this sewer district. Based on approval of this conceptual engineering report, it is Peconic Landing's intent to develop final design plans and specifications for construction of the sewer service as described within the report, If there are any questions concerning this report, please contact the undersign at your earliest convenience. D:\letters\cttno253\jobnoO1\pgs1-48 (W/encl.) Very Truly yours, ncip~ NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO~ 253-01 PECONIC LANDING CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT regarding the PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE for PECONIC LANDING AT 50UTHOLD. TOWN OF 50UTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK REGULATOI~Y REVIEW SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES Steven J. Costa, F.E Associate Public Health Engineer JUL 0 6 20~ Approval Date John Donovan, P.E Public Health Engineer Review Engineer NA"f LOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECt, ION NO. 255-0~ PECO,*~IC i A~DINQ FOREWORD This report covers the conditions and alternatives for the installation of a pumping station and force main to serve the project to be known as Peconic Landing at Southold. The addresses of the Owner and Key Consultants involved in the project are as follows: F'R. OJECT OWNEI~ U.S. Retirement Communities The Georgetown Building, 101 Chesley Drive Media, Pennsylvania 19063-1761 ATTN: John Dussling Project Coordinator (610) 627-2330 (Tel) (610) 627-2320 (Fax) WATEE PUMPING AND CONVEYANCE CONSULTANT Naylor Engineering Three Long Pond Road Ridge, Long Island 11961-1828 ATTN: John W. Naylor, Jr., P.E. Principal (516) 929*2860 (Tel) (516) 929-2859 (Fax) ATTOF, NEY Charles R. Cuddy. Esq. 445 Grilling Avenue, P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, Long Island 11901 ATTN: Charles R. Cuddy (516) 369-8200 (Tel) (516) 369-9080 (Fax) 5UF, VEYOF,~ 51TE PLANNING AND 51TE ENGINEEP, ING CONSULTANT Young and Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead. Long Island 11901 ATTN: Thomas C. Wolpert. P.E. Partner (516) 727-2303 (Tel) (516) 727-0144 (Fax) dea~peconic.net NA¥'I. 0R ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNEC1iON FF-,OJECT ^F, CHITECT Ewing Cole Cherry Brott Federal Reserve Bank Building Independence Mall West, 100 North 6th Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106-1590 ATTN: John Capelli Project Manager (215) 625-4626 (Tel) (215) 574-9802 (Fax) GF, EENFOF, T ,~EWEE DI,~TF-,ICT ENGINEEE Cameron Engineering 3 Aerial Way Syosset, Long Island 11590 ATTN: Mark Wagner, P.E. Associate (516) 827-4900 (Tel) (516) 827-4920 (Fax) The report has been divided loosely into the appropriate sections as delineated in the Table of Contents. For ease of reference, the sources of all footnotes are contained in Exhibit A, This report is CONFIDENTIAL and contains data which is copyrighted as the intellectual property of NAYLOR ENGINEERING. The Engineering Consultant (Naylor Engineering) reserves certain rights with regard to the confidentiality of various sources of design data and background information that may be referenced within this report. Said report may not be used for any purposes other than those specific uses for which it was intended, nor may the data contained within this report be distributed to any other party without the expressed written consent of the Engineer. This report also contains confidential information and data belonging to the project owner and for those parties with a demonstrated right to this information (i.e. regulatory review agencies), Exhibits A through C have been Included with this report. Ail other parties requesting such information must provide satisfactory evidence that the confidentiality of these items will be protected. See Section XIII - CONDITIONS for more specific information in this regard. Copyright @ 1990, 1998 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-Q1 PECONIC LANDING TAI~LE OF CONTENT5 SECTION DESCF. IFTION Fa~le No. Regulatory Review Approval Sheet ii. Foreword iii. Table of Contents I. Introduction il. Project Location, Description and Operations 2 Ill. Pump Station Location, Description and Operations 4 IV. Process Control Wastewater Hydraulic Loading 9 VI. Wastewater Quality 12 Sewer Piping Design Parameters 13 Pump Station Design Parameters A. Construction B. Hydraulic Sizing 14 15 iv NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING SECTION DESCF, IFTION Pa~e No. IX. Capital and Operational Cost Considerations 17 Recommendations and Conclusions 2O Force Main Routing Gravity Main or Force Main on Bailey Avenue Pump Station Equipment 2O 21 21 XI. Scheduling 23 Xll. Conditions 24 v NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO, 253-01 PECONIC LANDING LIST OF PLATES ?LATE NO. TITLE Follow5 ?a~ie No. Project Location Map 2 Pump Station and Sewer Main Plan 4 vi NA'TLOR ENG!NEERi~'G SEWER DISTRIC~ CONIqEC~:ION JO5 NO. 2£~3 {}I PECONIC ! AND[NG LIST OF AFFENDICE5 AFFENDIX EXHIBIT TITLE B. C. D. E. F, G. H. I. J. Footnote References Contract / Agreement with Village of Greenport Sewer District Pump Station and Wastewater Conveyance Facilities Plan Cost Estimates Site Plan - Pumping Station and Force / Gravity Main Catalog Cuts for Pumping Equipment Sewer System Plan - S.C. District No, 48 (Village of Greenport) Preliminary Architectural Plan Connection Authorization Letter from Village Public Water Availability Letter from SCWA vii NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253~ O~ PECONIC LANDING EEFOET NAY[ OR ENG i, E-ER NG ~aEWE~,~ DISTRIC~r CONNECI'ION ,JOB NO, 2~,~,-~ I. IN3'RODUCTION The proposed Peconic Landing at Southold Life Care Community is envisioned to be developed as a broad spectrum senior complex servicing Long Island's aging population. The project, as currently proposed wilt consist of 118 single family cottages, 132 multi-family apartments (40 one bedroom units, 82 two bedroom units and 10 three bedroom units), a Health Center (36 *Skilled Care" Beds and 24 *assisted living" apartments) and a 42,000 square foot community center, excluding the basement. All apartment units will be constructed with between 800 and 1,650 square feet of living area. A recreational area consisting of two tennis courts is also proposed. No sanitaw discharges will be associated with the tennis courts. No provision has been made for construction of additional units at a later stage or phase nor for the connection of neighboring facilities. The site is located in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County and Is currently zoned HD (Hamlet Density) and LB (Limited Business). The immediately surrounding area is not presently served by a municipal sanitary sewage collection and disposal system, however it is feasible to connect into the nearby Village of Greenport Sewer District, the nearest manhole for which is approximately ~ mile from the southwest corner of the proposed site. Therefore, as part of the development of this complex, the Owner is proposing to construct a sanitary sewage collection system, pumping station and force main to convey the wastewater produced by this project to the Village of Greenport Sewer District collection system. A copy of this section of the Village's collection system Is attached as Exhibit G. A formal agreement (See Exhibit B and I) with the District is in place whereby the District has agreed to receive the flow from the proposed site and extend their district's borders to encompass the entire Peconic Landing site. Under this agreement all facilities will be built by the project owner and turned over to the District. The agreement limits the total flow from the facility to 288,000 Gallons Per Day (GPD). Based on this limit, Naylor Engineering has developed design data relative to the wastewater flow calculations for the proposed multi-use sentor complex as well as the pump station and proposed force main route to connect to the Greenport Sewer District. This report elaborates upon the available design alternatives and the final proposed conceptual design. In addition it provides complex profiles of building type, square footages, usage and comparison to standard design criteria. PAGE 1 OF 24- NATLOR ENGINF~:R]NG S;EWE*-~ D]SiRJC7 CQNNEC1/iON II. PE. OJECT LOCATION. DESCP, IFTION, AND OFEF,.ATIONR The proposed Peconic Landing site is located In the Town of Southold, bounded on the south side by Main Road (Route 25) and on the north by the Long Island Sound. The project wilt have two entrances / exits on the north side of Route 25. A Location Map for the subject project is depicted on Plate No. 1. The si~ is 144.~7 acres tn area and is characterized by slightly sloping land with grades primarily from 0 - 6 % over the entire property. The relative site data for the proposed development consists is as follows: F, ELATIVE 51TE DATA PLOT SIZE 6,306,216 ft~ ROAD FRONTAGE (Route 25) 964 L.F. BUILDING AREA (Residential) 392,010 ft* (Gross) BUILDING AREA (Community Center) 42,000 ft* (Gross) BUILDING AREA (Health Center) 56,000 ft2 (Gross) BASEMENT AREA 16,880 F~ (Gross) BUILDING AREA (Future Arts Center) 14,000 ft* (Gross) (Brecknock Hall) S.C TAX MAP NO. 1000-0035-001-025 PROPOSED USAGE Planned Retirement Comm. & Proprietary Care CURRENT ZONING HD (Hamlet Density) / LB (Limited Business) Soils consist of primarily of Haven Loam which are associated with "deep well-drained medium textured soils" Ia. Other soils in the area include Riverhead Sandy Loam, Riverhead and Haven Soils and Plymouth Loamy Sand. No wetlands are located within 1,500 feet of the site. The project borders the Long Island Sound however no development will take place within 100 feet of the shoreline. A portion of the site is being deeded to the Suffolk County Water Authority as a public water supply well ts already located on the site. No development is taking place within 200 feet of the welt field. PAGE 2 OF 24 , JOB MUM~R 25~-0d MAYLOR BMG1MEERIMG PROJECT LOCATIOH MAP PECOHIC LAHDIHG NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING The ground water elevation at this site is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level (0 - 50 +_ feet deep) based upon the Groundwater Contour Map of Long Island published by SCDHS, Site elevations in developed areas range from 20 to 50 feet amsl, The wastewater collection, pumping and conveyance facilities will be absorbed into the Village of Greenport Sewer District. Water Supply facilities serving the complex will be owned and maintained by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA). Cross connection control will be accomplished by backfIow prevention devices at the following Ioc~tion~: Pumping Station Pool Service Health Center Community Center Apartment Building Cultural A~s Cent. er Irrigation Systems Hydronic Heating Systems (if any) RPZ (Reduced Pressure Zone Device) RPZ RPZ RPZ RPZ RPZ DCV (Double Check Valve) DCV The existing water supply well site as well as currently existing water mains connecting with off site mains will be deeded to SCWA. Roads and drainage facilities will remain in private ownership. PAGE 3 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING III, PUMP STATION LOCATION AND FOI~.CE MAIN F. OUTING As ground elevations are higher between the facility and the point of discharge (Manhole No. 185), a pump station is required to convey the water upslope. The ideal location for the station would be where it can: 1) Be readily connected to the discharge points from the existing (and future) buildings for the site, 2) Be situated such that the discharge is directly toward the proposed sewer line extension, oqn~ 3) Be accessible for easy maintenance and service. The Pumping Station is proposed to be located at a south central location on the site which is approximately 600 feet north of a point on the R.O.W. line of Route 25 which is approximately 165 feet west of Manhasset Avenue. The proposed Pump Station site e, tevation is 16.1 amsl. This location is in e×cess of !00 feet from the northeast corner of an 2.5 acre outparcel which the subject property surrounds like an inverted horseshoe. The exact location of the proposed pumping station is shown on the site plan (See Exhibit E) and. in less detail, on Plate No. 2. The proposed location provides for easy access via even existing roadways and is far enough from any neighboring buildings and properties so as to minimize any possibility of inconvenience from noise or odors. A control building will be provided to house control and alarm panels as well as store spare parts and tools which may be used for the maintenance and repair of equipment on site, The most logical force main routing is to exit the Peconic Landing site at the south west corner at Main Road (Route 25). At this time it is envisioned that, upon exiting the station, the force main will proceed in a generally southwesterly direction in several individual sections as indicated in the table on the following page: PAGE 4 OF 24 r ~YLOR B~GI~EB~I~G S1TB ¢LA~ - FORCE / GRAVITY HA1M ~OUT1MG NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING FOI~¢E MAIN I~OuTING, PUMP STATION TO I~AILEY AVENUE AND I[OUTE 2§ From To (Gr°uflaE!evatlon) Length Direction (A2) Pumping Station Cleanout No. 1 (20.1) 301 Southwest / West Cleanout No. 1 Cleanout No. 2 (21.0) 256 Southwest / West Cleanout No. 2 Cleanout No, 3 (23.0) 307 Southwest Cleanout No. 3 Cleanout No. 4 (21.2) 235 West Southwest Cleanout No. 4 Cleanout No. 5 (18,1) 365 South Southwest Cleanout No. 5 Cleanout No. 6 (18.0) 328 South / West Cleanout No. 6 Manhole No. P1 293 West TOTAL LENGTH 2,08§ From this point, within the context of this report two (2) alternate force main routes were investigated for feasibility of application along Route 25: Al) North Side of Highway West along Route 25, running at least 10 feet north and parallel to the existing 12" water main, then across Route 25 (via jacking) to a manhole / cleanout (Ground Elev, 21.0) at the corner of Bailey Avenue, This alternate will require at least a working easement from the neighboring property owner to the west. Total Length of this option is 639 Feet. A2) South Side of Highway Jack or bore immediately across Route 25, then East through sidewalk area to same point on Bailey Avenue. From a construction standpoint, this option is both more difficult and more costly due to the excessive effort involved in working in close proximity to gas mains, overhead electric and both above and below ground telephone utilities as well as restoring driveways and sidewalks. Total Length of this option is 621 Feet. PAGE 5 OF 24 NAY~OR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO~ 253~0~ PECONIC LANDING Once at Bailey Avenue, the second set of alternatives presents itself. From this point on, it makes much more sense from an engineering standpoint to continue with a gravity sewer. The topography is such that, from this point on. an 8" gravity sewer would meet the connection manhole at the intersection of Atlantic Avenue and Bridge Street with room to spare. The advantage to this alternative is that it would easily allow the connection of all the homes along Bailey and Atlantic Avenue as well as provide connection points for future sewer mains at Knapp Place, Champlin Place and Route 25. Obviously, the construction of a gravity sewer would be more expensive than a force main and would provide no tangible return to the developer of the Peconic Landing project. As the current agreement between the developer and the Sewer District calls only for the construction of the force main, if this option were selected, the District would have to agree to pick up the difference in cost between a ~ravity sewer and force main for the conveyance facilities along Bailey Avenue, Champlin Place and Atlantic Avenue. Data provided by the Village of Greenport and confirmed via site survey indicates that the nearest and most feasible point of connection is Manhole No. 185 at the intersection of Bridge Street and Atlantic Avenue. Pertinent data relative to his manhole is as follows: MANHOLE DATA (MH NO. 1~§) Rim Elevation 15.49 South Invert (Exit) 7.29 East Invert 7.29 Northeast Invert 8.89 The pipe exiting this manhole is a 12" vitrified tile gravity sewer main at a slope of 1.25 % with a car .tying capacity of 2.4 MGD. The pipe entering from the east appears to be a pipe stub for connection of a future main from Bridge Street and the one from the northeast is depicted on the copy of the Greenport Sewer map as a pipe which originates from Champlin Place. This pipe was not picked up in field surveys however. PAGE 6 OF 24 NAYI. OR ENGINEERING SEWER DIS'IRIC7 CONNEC'ilON PL.~.~ ,,~,,~ LANDING Nc. 2~3 ~1 From the intersection of Bailey Avenue and Route 25, the routing of the force main or sewer would follow that depicted in the table on the following page. Note however that if a gravity main was used, the From / To locations would be Manhole Nos. P2 through P6 instead of Cleanout Nos. 7 through 11. FOE. CE IGF, AVITY MAINE. OUTING" INTEF, DECTION OF BAILEY AYENUE AND ROUTE 25 TO ATLANTIC AVENUE AND E, EIDGE STREET5 From To (Ground Elevation) Ler~j~h Dlreu*'flon Manhole No. P1 Cleanout No. 7 (20.1) 256 South Cleanout No. 7 Cleanout No. 8 (18.2) 271 South Cleanout No. 8 Cleanout No. 9 (17.2) 214 South Cleanout No. 9 Cleanout No. 10 (14.0) 241 South Cleanout No. 10 Cleanout No. 11 (13.4) 48 East Cleanout No. 11 Manhole No. 185 (15.5) 266 South TOTAL LENGTH 1,290 The collection system, pump station and sewer main(s) as covered by this report have been designed in accordance with applicable portions of various publications including Suffolk County Code Chapter 424 "Sewers" and "Recommended Standards of Sewage Works of the Great Lakes-Upper Mississippi River Board of State Sanitary Engineers[~, (latest edition 1978), "Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction For Sewage Disposal Systems For Other Than Single Family Homes", as well as the General Design Memos of the Suffolk County Department of Public Works, the Standards of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services as well as other referenced Federal, State and Local codes and guidelines. Where conflicts exist between the data published among the various sources, prudent engineering judgments are made based upon the experiences of this author as well as other members of the firm. PAGE 7 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO, 253-01 ?ECONIC LANDING I¥. ?EOCE55 CONTEOL The basis for design for the wastewater disposal system will be the aforementioned design guidelines and Standards and a maximum allowable flow as determined in Section V of this report. A flow metering and recording system will be installed at the pumping station to record for the sanitary discharges fr om the site, An emergency power generating system will be provided so as to allow for the conveyance of sewage during times where utility power fails due to storms or other outages. The station will be equipped with an alarm system and telephone dialer to monitor the following parameters: Unauthorized Entry Power Failure High Water Level Low Water level Fire Generator Fai!ure Pump Failure (one per pump) Redundant Low water Level The alarm dialer will be capable of monitoring a total of eight (8) individual alarm conditions and of notifying up to eight (8) separate locations for each monitored f~nction. PAGE 8 OF 24 NAYI. OR ENGIHEER~NG SEWER DISTRIC1 CONNEC"flON PEL-~,,~,'., LAND,NO ,JOD NO. 253'01 -,~*,,r ., ¥. WA,~TEWAq~R HYDRAULIC LOADINe The expected discharges at the subject site are based upon the following contributory categories: 1) 2) 3) 5) Residential (Senior Cottages) Residential (Senior Apartments) Community Center Health Center Cultural / Arts Center SUMMATION OF: CONTRIE~UTOR¥ FLOW,~ Item Des~;rIFl~lon No. ~ Units Gmee Unl~ Design Flow Average or CaFl~ Area per Ufll~ FI~ A,I Senior Aoa~ments 20 800 ~ 150 3,QOQ,O0 Senior Apartments 20 900 * 150 3,000.00 Senior Apa~ments 35 1,150 * 150 5,250.00 Senior Apa~ments ~ 1,350 * 150 6,000.00 Senior Apa~ments 17 1,650 ' 150 2,550,00 A.2 Senior Cottages 0 9QQ oen~or Cottages ~5 1,300 * 150 2,250.0~ Senior Cottages 53 1,650 * 150 7,950.00 Senior Cottages 50 r,950 150 7,500.00 SUBTOTAL 37.~00.00 ;ommunity B.1 Entrance fac I ~es NA 1,500 0.06 90.00 B.2 Administration NA 2,529 Q.06 15~,74 B.3.t Gathering Room NA 3,215 0.06 192.90 ~.3.2 Chair / Equip, Storage NA 321 0,06 19.26 B.3.3 Formal Dining 30 1,28o 7.50 225.00 B.~,.4 informal Dining 30 2,572 7.50 225.00 B.3.5 Pr'vote Pining 30 643 7.50 225.00 B.3,6 Exterior Dining 30 643 7,50 225.00 PAGE 9 OF 24. NAYLQR ENGINEERING SEWER [PlSTRiCT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-0'1 PECONfC LANIPlNQ 5.3.7 Living Room / Lounge NA !.340 0,06 80,40 5.3.7 Library NA 1,715 Q,Q3 5t,45 5.3.8 Coat Area NA 214 Q.Q6 12.84 B.3.9 Toilet Rooms NA 643 Q.06 38.58 ' B.3,10 Sank / 5rokerage NA 107 0.06 6.42 5.3.11 Beauty/Sarber Salon NA 375 Q.Q6 22.50 ~ 5.3.12 Convenience Market NA (;}43 0.05 32.15 5.3.13 Storage NA t07 O,Q4 4.28 5.3.14 Cart Parking NA 214 Q,Q4 8.56 B.3.15 Chapel / Medltation NA 536 Q.06 52.16 B.4,1 Swimming Pool NA 6,432 0.30 1,929.60 B.4,2 .ocker Room / Toilets NA 643 0.30 192.90 5.4.3 Exercise Rooms NA 965 0.30 289,50 5.4.4 Physical Therapy NA 64.3 Q.1Q 64.30 5.4.5 Craft Rooms NA 1,929 0.03 57.87 5.4.6 Wood / Metal Shop NA 965 Q.04 38.60 ~.4,7 Tennis CouPs NA NA NA O.QO B.4.8 5iliiard Room NA 429 Q.OQ Q.QO B.5 Pietary / Housekeeping NA 8,948 0.00 Q.OQ B.6 Maintenance / Engineer. NA 2,443 Q.OQ Q.OQ SUBTOTALS 42,000 4,216.01 Health Center C,1 Skilied Care Center 36 19,152 150.QQ 5,400.00 C.2 Assisted t_iving Center 20 21,439 i10.Q0 2,200.00 C.3 Shared Facilities 20 7.583 110.Q0 2,200,Q0 C,4 Resident Care Center NA 2,306 0,10 230.60 C.2 Wellness Center NA 3,937 0.30 1,18!,10 C.2 DayCare Center 20 1,583 5,00 100.00 SUI~TOTALS 56,000 11,311 ~recknock Hall D.2 Culturai/ Arts Center NA 14,QQQ 0,30 4,200,00 SUBTOTALS 14,000 4,200.00 TOTALS §7,227,71 NOTES: * These figures based upon "Net" Floor Area and exclude items such as hallways and common areas not within the confines of the apartment. PAGE 10 OF 24 NAYI. OR ENGIF'IEERING SEWER DISTRIC1 CONNECllON J~D N~,. X't53-~./1 PECONIC LANDING The quantities and square footages contained In the preceding table were based on the Preliminary Space Program, which is attached as Exhibit C, prepared by the Project Architect and pro-rated according to the scaled-down gross floor areas for the community center and health center. Preliminary architectural plans for the units are attached as Exhibit H. Unit Design Flow Rates are as per SCDHS standards. As the common area facilities are reserved solely for the use of the homeowners and their guests, no adjustment of flows should, in our opinion, be made for these facilities. However since SCDHS official policy is in conflict with this opinion, our design is based upon SCDHS standards. Also, since garbage grinders are not to be incorporated in the units, no increase in organic loading levels is warranted. The cumulative total in the preceding table of 57,227.71 GPD will be rounded off to 60,000 GPD for the purposes of design. Based upon past experience at similar projects of this type and the degree of certainty which may be applied to existing data, we estimate a peak hourly flow rates of 4.00 / 1.00 and a peak 4 hour flow rate of 2.00 / 1.00. PAGE 41 OF 24. NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICI CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING VI. WASTEWATEI( QUALITY in the various treatment facilities (20+) for which we had performed design services for plant upgrades in Suffolk County over the last 13 years, we utilized composite sampling techniques, taking one (1) sample every hour for a period of seventy-two (72) hours usually including one weekend day. Based upon these results, as well as past experience, the following wastewater characteristics are anticipated for the wastewater being pumped from this facility. PUMP STATION EFFLUENT WA,~TEWATER CHARACTERISTIC5 Fa~'a me*r, er ] Pe,Jlgn Values BOD~ (Total Biological Oxygen Demand - 5 Day) 200 ~ 268 BOD,o, (Soluble Biological Oxygen Demand - 5 Day) 100 - 134 TSS (Total Suspended Solids) 200 - 268 VSS (Volatile Suspended Solids) 140 - 200 NH~, (Ammonia) 20 - 35 ORGANIC NITROGEN 10 - 20 TKN (Totai Kjeldahl Nitrogen) 30 - 55 NOo & NO3 (Nitrites and Nitrates) 0 - 1 TOTAL NITROGEN 30 - 56 TOTAL ALKALINITT 120 - 150 pH 6.5 - 7.5 DO (Dissolved Oxygen) 0.5 DETERGENTS 15.0 PHENOLS 50 ppb PAGE 12 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING VII. 5EWEF, FIFING DESIGN FAF, AMETEF,5 For the Force Main oortion of the proiect, a four (4") inch diameter PVC force main would be used~ Said pipe would conform to AWWA C900 standards for DR-18 or 25, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pressure pipe. This pipe has the following E~ flow characteristics: FLOW CHAEACTEI~ISTIC,~ - 4" DIAMETEE ?VC FOF. CE MAIN DF. 2§ (100 ?si Pressure Class) DF. 1~ (1§0 Fsi Pressure Class) Flow Velocity Head Loss Velocity , Head Loss (gpm) (fps) (Ft / t00 Ft) (fps) (Ft / 100 Ft) 80 1.69 o.24 1.80 0.29 90 1.90 Q.30 2,05 0.36 1QQ 2.10 0.37 2,28 Q.44 t25 2.60 0.56 2.85 0.67 150 3.10 0.79 3.42 0.94 175 3.70 1.04 3.99 1.25 Ifa gravity pipe is used, said pipe would be an eight (8") inch diameter PVC gravity main. Said pipe would conform to ASTM 3034 standards for DR 35 pipe. Utilizing a minimum slope of 0.40 % and a roughness coefficient (n) of n 0.009, this pipe would have a capacity in excess of 673,000 GPD ~4a or 467 gpm. The force main would be installed with a constant uphill pitch from the pumping station to the location of Oeanout No. 3 which would also serve as the location of an Air Release Chamber. A manhole installed at this location would contain an air release and vacuum valve to allow entrapped air and gases to exit the main at the highpoint as well as to allow air into the main as the pipe drains through the downhill portion to Bailey Avenue. PAGE 13 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING VIII. PUMP STATION DESIGN PAF. AMETEES A. Construction Based uoon previous experience and a review of the hydraulic loading of wastewater from the Peconic Landing site, it is recommended that lare-cast concrete wet well with non-clog, submersible cutter pumps be installed. This is deemed to be the safest, least intrusive and most cost effective wet well type for pumping stations in this small size range. Since the water table in this area is estimated at 13 feet deep and soils are considered to be well-drained, buoyancy considerations are deemed not to be a maior concern at this facility. We will have to await the final design of wastewater collection systems before making a final determination in this regard as a Iow influent invert may require greater depth than anticipated. To handle the solids in the waste stream, heavy duty "cutter type pumps will be used. This type of pump differs greatly from the maintenance intensive *grindee' type pump in that cutter designs are intended for heavy duty municipal applications rather than the lighter duty typically associated with grinder pumps. The units are equipped with a rotating cutter cone and stationary knife which *cuts" rather than grinds solids in the waste stream. Pump Station Accessories will include the following as a minimum: Duplex Control Panel containing all starters, controls, relays. alternator, alarm lights, dialer, etc. required for proper operation. 2. Pump Floats - stainless steel, mercury type with 35 year average life. Break Away Fittings - Non-sparking type suitable for Class I, Division 1, group D locations with 1-1/2" diameter SCH 40 stainless steel guide rails. 4. Pump Hoist - Stainless Steel, rated for at least twice pump weight. 5. Flowmeter - Magnetic type PAGE I4 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANOING 10. Check Valves - Swing Check type w/ outside lever and weight. Outside lever to be equipped with limit switches to monitor pump activation. Failure of lever arm to swing open upon call for pump start shall trigger failure alarm and start lag pump. Plug Valves - Full port, quarter turn plug valves will be used for pump isol~tio~, Motor Starters Solid state "soft" type alternately a variable frequency drive (VFD) may be used. Access Hatches ~ on wet well and valve pit will be 300 psf rated duplex "Bilco" type with gutter drain, air piston and locking handle. Limit switches on doors will monitor unauthorized entry. Emergency Generator - will be natural gas fueled if available, otherwise diesel type, with double wall storage tank mounted in base. Unit will be installed in Control Building to provide greater sound attenuation and protect from vandalism. D. H~draulic Sizing Proposed Pumping Capacity = 60,000 GPD x 4.00 Peaking Factor = 240,000 GPD / 1,440 min./day = 166.67 gpm / 1 pump operating = 166.67 gpm say165 gpm per pump Maximum Wet Well Volume = 10 min. x 60,000 GPD / 1,440 min. / day = 416.67 say 420 gallons Min. Wet Well Volume (Where T = Cycle Time N = No. of Pumps) =TQ/4N = 15 min. x165 gpm / (4x 2 pumps) = 309.38 gallons < 420 gallons PAGE 15 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING Unit Wet Well Capacity (nx D: / 4) X 7.48 gal, / cu. PC {~: x 8~' / 4) X 7.48 gal. / cu. Pc 375.98 say 375 gallons Working Depth Max. Volume / Unit Capacity 1.12 say 13.5 inches Said oumps will be required to overcome a static head of approximately 10 feet (worst case) as well as the friction head developed in the force main. Depending upon the option chosen for the sewer from Bailey Avenue to MH 185, total ;riction head wi!l be as FF. ICTION L055 COMFAF, tSON Option on Force Main Equivalent Total Head Lose / Total Dailey Ave. Length Length 100 feet Head Loes Gravity 2,085 149 2,234 0.94 21.0 Force Main 3,381 193 3,574 0.94 33.6 In the table above the "Length" column represents the physical length of the force main whereas the "Equivalent Length" column represents the "equivalent length", in feet of pipe, for the total amount of fittings on the line. Pipe velocity in the 4" force main would be 3.49 feet per second (fps), well above the 2.0 fps minimum and still above the minimum pick up velocity of 3.3 fps. With pumps in this size range having a shutoff head of between 32 and 80 Total Dynamic Head (TDH), this will limit the allowable friction loss to between 20 and 50 feet or roughly 0.9 to 1.4 feet per 100 feet of pipe. Four inch (4") diameter ductile iron pipe has a calculated friction loss of 1.99 feet per 100 feet, compared to 0.94 feet per 100 feet for PVC. PAGE 16 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING IX. CAFITAL AND OFEEATIONAL COST CONSIDEF, ATION5 A. Capital Cost~ Exhibit D compares the costs of the various force / gravity main alternates. For purposes of convenience, these are summarized in the following table. Only those capital costs directly applicable to each alternate are included in this analysis. Items common to all alternates (i.e. engineering, permit and application fees, etc.) are therefore omitted. Costs presented are based upon manufacturer's quotes and published cost estimating guides (Means Cost Data Book). For~ion ~Main A1 11~t A~ i1~2 ~ Pump Sra. ~> Bailey Ave. $145,713 $ I45,713 $ 205,862 $ 205,862 Bailey Ave. -> Bridge St. $ 245,022 $128,193 $ 245,022 $ I28,193 $ 390,735 $ 273,906 $ 450,884 $ 334,055 Where: A1 is the Route along the north side of Route 25 A2 is the Route along the south side of Route 25 B1 is a gravity main down Bailey Avenue to Bridge Street B2 is a force main down Bailey Avenue to Bridge Street The table on the following page comprises the cost estimate for the pumping station: PAGE 17 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING PI~ELIMINAI~Y CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE (I~UMPING ~TATiON) 1. Provide two (2) new 5 HP cutter pumps w/ motors, $ 27,000.00 tungsten carbide seals and all required accessories, complete. 2. New noncorrosive Integrated Control Panel, Alarm $21,000.00 Dialer for pump station including all wiring, complete. 3. Precast Manhole for wet well, complete with Class B $12,000.00 concrete sloped walls, aluminum access hatches, electric, floats and alarm wiring, complete. 4. Control / Storage Building (200 sq.ft.) $19,000.00 5. Precast Concrete Valve Box w/two 4" check valves and $10,000.00 three 4" plug valves, complete. 6. Site work, yard piping, driveway, walks, landscaping, $ 6,000.00 etc., complete~ 7. Emergency Power Facilities and all Appurtenances, $18,000.00 complete. 6. Miscellaneous costs for temporary services, $11,300.00 contingencies, etc~ TOTAL PF-,ELIMINAF-,Y 605T5 $ 124,300.00 Operational Costs Operational costs would be comprised almost wholly of electric costs for powering the pumping equipment. PAGE 18 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO~ 253-04 PECONIC / ANDING Power consumption and costs are detailed in the following tables: ANT!CIFATED FOWEE CONSUM?TION Item I~rake H? Hr,/day, KW-hrst&ay Cutter Pump (1) 5.0 6 22.38 Ventilator (1) Q,1 24 1.79 Misc. Electrical items 0.3 24 5.37 TOTALS §.4 29.§4 The Monthy Cost of Electricity is equal to the sum of energy and demand charges. Since service charges can not be estimated at this time, these will be ignored for the purposes of this analysis. ANTICIFATED POWEE COSTS Charge Unit Cost, Cost, / Month kw-hre / Aver. Days day per Month Monthly Energy Charge 28.65 30.4 $0.1010 $87.97 I~rake HP Kw/HP Monthly Demand Charge 5.4 0,746 $40.40 $41.90 TOTAL POWER COST $129.86 5ay $130.00 PAGE 19 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING X. F. ECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS A. Force Main Routing The shortest and most cost effective route for installing a sewer connection for the Peconic Landing site to the Village of Greenport Sewer District is to run the main from the pumping station to the southwest corner of the site, then along the north side of Route 25, then down Bailey Avenue onto Champlin Place then on to Atlantic Avenue to MH No. 185 at Bridge Street. Running along the north side of Route 25 will, at the least, require a "working easement" from the a~oining property owner. Maintaining appropriate distances from the existing water main places the force main within 1 or 2 feet of the property line. The use of an excavator will result in the disturbance if vegetation for approximately 5 feet on either side of the force main. A working easement of approximately 10 feet along the existing east-west property line, from the Peconic Landing site to a point opposite the west R.O.W. tine of Bailey Avenue is recommended. In addition, the jacking pit will require a working easement of approximately 40 feet by 20 feet immediately opposite Bailey Avenue. If this easement can not be obtained, working easements may be required from individual property owners along the south side of Route 25 from a point opposite the western border of the Peconic Landing property to Bailey Avenue. tt is therefore our recommendation that Option A-l, along the north side of Route 25, be chosen. If, for whatever reason, the easement can not be obtained then Option A-2, along the south side of Route 25, remains the only feasible option, PAGE 20 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253- 01 PECON lC LAN DIN G Gravity Main or Force Main on f~aile3/Avenue it is obvious that it would be in the Village of Greenl~ort's interest to have a gravity main installed beginning at the intersection of Bailey Avenue and Route 25 and running to Atlantic Avenue and Bridge Street. This would allow for the immediate connection of at least 32 homes along the route of the main. There is however a significant cost difference ($ 116,829) between the force and gravity mains. As the developer of the Peconic Landing site is compelled only to construct a force main, the additional cost of the gravity main, over and above that of the force main, would have to be picked up by the Village. The original agreement between the developer and the Village stipulated a connection fee of $ 2,570 per dwelling. At this cost, connecting the 32 homes alon~ the route would bring the Village Revenue in the amount of $ 82,240 or approximately 70 % of the additional cost. Based upon the preceding, it would be our recommendation that a gravity main be constructed from Route 25 and Bailey Avenue to existing MH No. 185 C. Pump Station Equipment A summary of pertinent information relative to the facility's actual average daily flow and pumping equipment is as follows: The proposed facility's design flow rate, under current SCDHS design ?tandards~ is 6Q,OQQ GPD, The appropriate peaking factor for a facility of this size range is 4.0 resulting in a peak flow of 240,000 GPD or 165 gpm. The use of a pump alternator whereby successive calls to the control system to empty the wet well result in the use of any one pump only on every other pump call allows for the sizing of the wet well below the maximum volume recommended to prevent septic conditions. PAGE 21 OF 24 NA'¥LOR ENGINEFRiNG SEWER DISTRICT CONN~:C'iION JOB Nu. ~,,o-~ PECONIC ~,~,.N[,INu~ Depending upon the option chosen, the pumping equipment will be as follows: PUMPING CHARACTERISTICS Ol~ion Dee~Hption Static Friction TDH Head Head B1 Pump to Bailey Avenue (2,085') 8.00 21.00 29.00 B2 Pump to MH No. 185 (3,381') 2.00 36.60 38.60 Subsequent to final design analysis, it is envisioned to use the following pumping equipment: OF~ion I~1 - Barnes 4SCC, 4.8 HP, 1750 rpm Cutter Pump with Tungsten Carbide Seals and 6.5 inch impeller. The design point for this pump would be 165 gpm ~ 29 feet of TDH. Ol~lon f~2 - Dames 4SCD, 4.8 HP, 1750 rpm Cutter Pump with Tungsten Carbide Seals and 7.1 inch impeller. The design point for this pump would be 165 gpm ~ 39 feet of TDH. Catalog Cuts for the proposed pumping equipment are attached as Exhibit F. PAGE 22 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGiNEERiNG SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253~ 01 PECONIC LANDING Xl. SCHEDULING All scheduling listed below is based u~on the submission date stipulated on the Title Page of this Engineering Report. Postponements or other delays beyond the control of the Owner or Design Engineer, due to resubmissions, approvals etc., will result in equivalent setbacks in this schedule~ TARGET DATE 06~05-98 06-26-98 07-17-98 07-31-98 09-30-98 10-31-98 11-21-98 12-07-98 12-15-99 01-31-99 02-15-99 03-01-99 05-15-99 05-31-99 SUBMISSION OR DESCRIPTION Submit Engineering Report Obtain SCDHS / Village of Greenport Comments Submit Addenda to Engineering Report Obtain Approval of Engineering Report Submit Plans & Specs for Approval Obtain Review Comments from SCDHS / Village Resubmit Plans and Specs Obtain Approval of Plans/Specs Solicit Bids Receive Bids Award Contract Begin Construction Corn plete Construction Complete Operational Testing PAGE 23 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING Xll. CONDITIONS This report contains design data and information which is proprieta~ and confidential. The entire report is fundamentally based upon independent research, study and long term investigations conducted by Engineer at his own cost and expense. As such, this report is therefore intended for the sole use of the Owner in coniunction with the design of wastewater conveyance facilities serving the proposed senior complex known as Peconic Landing in Southold, Long Island, The information, methods and design data used by the Engineer within, or referenced by., this report are considered proprieta~ and, as such, shall remain the property of the Engineer. All such information provided under this contract is considered as confidential information, and as such shall be held in strict confidence by all parties receiving copies from the Engineer. Neither the Owner, nor any other party, may copy this information, provide this information to other persons, nor utilize this information in any manner, except as specifically delineated herein, without first having obtained the written consent of the Engineer. The means, methods, information, content and format of this report are copyricihted by the author. The means, methods, information, content and format and data contained herein may not be used in the preparation of subsequent, or, similar desi~lns by the other parties without the expressed written consent of said Engineer. Usage, by any party, of the means, methods, information, content and format of this report in any manner and for any purpose, except as specifically delineated herein will be prosecuted, both in criminal and civil courts, under the full extent of the law. Any questions or comments relative to this report shall be directed to said Engineer at the address / telephone number indicated in the foreword of this report. Res NAYLOR ~!NEERING PAGE 24 OF 24 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING EXHII~ITS NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING EXHII~IT A FOOTNOTE REFERENCE5 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING FOOTNOTES: 5oil 5u~/ey of Suffolk County, New York, page 81, United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, April, 1975. 2. Generally known as the Ten States Standards. 3. Han~lbook of PVC Pipe, pg. 284, UniBell PVC Pipe Association, December 1993. 4. Handbook of PVC Pipe, pg. 336, UniBell PVC Pipe Association, December 1993. NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING EXHIBIT CONTE. ACT/ AGEEEMENT WITH GF. EENFOI~T 5EWEI~ DISTI~ICT {'CONFIDENTIAL~ WATER SUPPLY AND SA~;ITARY SEWAGE AGREEMENT T~I$ AGREEMENT made this day of March, 1986, by and between the VILLAGE OM GREFMPORT, e municipal corporation h.~vtn~ its office end principal place of busine,e at 2]6 Third Street, Greenport, New York 11944, hereinafter called the 'VILLAGE", and the GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CORP., at 53 Glen Cove Road, Greenvale, called the "OWNER". WHEREAS, the OWNER is as "Breakers at Islands End', York, on its property, which July 16, 1984 and recorded in with principal offices located New York 11458, hereinafter WITNESSETH~ about to co,enos a development known Grsenport, Town of $outhold, New it presently owns, by deed dated the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on July 20, ].984 in Llber 9604, page 529, located on the northerly ~lde of Main Road, State Route 25, which is more par- ticularly de~cribed in Schedule A which ia annexed hereto; which involves the dnvelopment and ccnstr~ction of~ 350 individual dwelllng units along with a recreational building, existing dwellings, buildings and accessory structures. The construction will require the installation of a water mupply well, water and ~ewage mains, fire hydrants and a sewage collection station(s) on certain rights-of-way and portions of as genernlly ~hown on the Preliminary Plan for Water Sanitary Sewage Systems prepared by Staven J. Hymen, is attached )~ereto a~ Schedule B; and to connect the lift the property Supply and P.E., which aforesaid -1- Water supply and sewage collection systems with the VILLAGE water and sewage treatment systems which are shown on Schedule C, in conformance with plan. and specification, which will be approved by the VILLAGE, and a~ may be amended fr~m time to time during the course of construction of the proJect~ and W}{EREAS, tbs OWNER is willing, st its cost and expense, to construct and install the complete water supply and sanitary sewage ~y~tem~ which will include among other things, wells, water maine, hydrants, sewage mains, lift station(s), all of which will be merged with the water supply and sewage systems of the VILLAGE for the project called the "Breakers at Islands End' located on the premises more particularly described in Schedule A, and to transfer and convey same to the VILLAGE upon co~ple- tion, in whole or in part, and to give and procure easements for the maintenance of the wells, water and sewaqa systems, fire hydrants, lift station(s) end other necessary appurtenances for the proper operation of the aforesaid water supply and sewage collection systems~ and WSEREAS, th~ VILLAGE is willing to supply the OWNER with its requested water allowances of approximately 200,000 gallons a?eraga daily flow and 250,000 gallons peak demand flow, coll,ct the sewage from the proJectl and W~EREAS the OWNER repre~ent~ report of ~olxmachar, McLendon & 15, 1984 that the primary based upon the engineering teat Murrell, P.C. (H2M) dated June water mup~ty ~ll will supply as least -2- two hundred forty (1440) (200) gallons per minute times fourteen hundred and minutes par day or a total daily gallonage ~apscity (288,000) gallons per day~ of two hundred eighty-eight thousand and W~EREAS, the partie~ have agreed upon the terms and con- ditions for tbs supply of water supply sod sewage collection systems and other matters Ms hereinafter ~et forth%. WHEREAS~ The parties understand that final approval of the development map has not been received by the OWNER from all the necessary public authorities. The VILLAGE enters into this agreement to assist the OWNER in securing such approvals and by way of contractually assuring to the ~WN~R a public water supply and sanitary sewage system if devalop~nt'approval ie secured by the OWNER. NOW, T~EREFORE, in consideration of the premises ~nd cove- nants herein, it is mutually agreed as follows~ FIR~T~ The VILLAGE agrees to assist the OWNER in securing ell municipal approvals and permits and assuring to the public authorities a public water supply and sanitary sewage system to the OWNER's project 'Breakers at Islands End", and the VILLAGE will be responsible for obtaining all permits fro~ municipal authorities well(s). SECOND~ for the installation .nd hookup of the water supply The OWNER agrees to in,tall, at its own cost and on the property described in Bchedule A, a water supply -3- system and a sanitary sewage collection system limited to, s water supply well or wells, water and distribution of water, and sewage mains and including, but not mains for supply lift station(a) for the proper collection of sewage from the project as outlined on the attached Preliminary Plan for Water Supply and Sanitary Sewage Systems prepared by Staves J. ~ymsn, P.E., which ia attached hereto as Schedule B. THIRD~ All necessary engineering and construction for the installation of the complete water supply and sanitary sewage systems on the OWNER's property described in Schedule A will be referred to as the "WORK", which shall be designed and constructed by the OWNER and/or its subcontractors. Tbs WORK shall be in accordance with plans and spectficatious which are be prepared by the OWNER's engineer, to be approved by the VILLAGE Engineer and Superintendent of Utilities in writing before the OWNER commences the WORK. ~owever, the design and engineering for the well field and the lift station(s), together with appurtenant structures will be c~leted by ~olsmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C. (H2M), of 575 Broedhollow Road, Melville, New York. FOURTH~ All of the for the installation of at the OWNER's property, Bailey Avenue, to Avenue, Greenport, to design, engineering and construotion work sanitary sewage mains from the connection across and along Stats Route 25, along the VILLAGE's existing sewage main on Atlantic New York, shall be the responsibility of the -4- VILLAGE to perform and construct same. fowever, all costs incurred e~d associated with the engineering end construction of this off-site sewage line will be reimbursed to the VILLAGE by the OWNER. Reimbursement payments will be made by the OWNER within thirty (30) days of when billed by the VILLAGE, and said payments w~ll be the VILLAGE's actual cost incurred. FIFT~ A. The VILLAGE requires a charqe for each dwellin~ unit of TWO THOUSAND FIVE ~UNDRED SEVENTI ($2,570.00) DOLLARS for the hookup of a public water supply and a charge of TWO T~OUBAND FIVE RUNDRED EIG~TY-FIVE ($2,585.00) DOLLARS per dwelling unit for the hookup of wa~tewater sewage services. Said charges ss received by the VILLAGE shall be placed in a "Back Bone Plant - Reserve Fund" to be used for the following needs of the VILLAGE! well, site production, transmlaelon mains, storage facilities, plant site treatment, added westewater treatment plant, pump sta- tion, force and gravity maine, so as to assure the Q~FNHR of future adequate water supply and a sanitary sewage treatment facilities, pursuant to a resolution of the VILLAGE Board of Trustees on July 18, 1985. Upon the execution of this agreement the OWNER shall pay the VILLAGE the sum of TWENTY (20%) PERCENT of the aforementioned charges which ia T~P~EE ~UNDRED SIXTY T~OUSAND EIGBT RUNDRED FIFTY ($360,850.00) DOLLANS. The balance of the aforesaid charges shall be paid as followa! TWENTY-FIVE (25%) PERCENT of the per unit fee then in force and effect at the time the OWNER applies for and receive, a Building Permit for -5- dwelling units on the premises and the balance of FIFTY-FIVE (55%) PERCENT of the fee for each dwelling unit at the time a request i~ made by the the Town of Southold. the time of receipt of OWNER for a Certificate of Occupancy from The actual money paid to the VILLAGE at a Building permit end the request for a Certificate of Occupancy (TWENTY-FIVE [25%] PERCENT and FIFTY-FIVE [55%] PERCENT respectively) shall be based on the current charges of the VILLAGE at the time of the request, as said charges may be periodically amended Trustees after s public hearing pursuant the VILLAGE engineers. entitled incurred by the VILLAGE Board of to a recommendation by B. It is understood and agreed that the OWNBR shall be to a monetary credit for actual co,ts and expenses by the OWNER, including design, engineering and construction costs in the development of the well or wells and accessory capital structures, e~cluding water mains, appurtenant thereto in the water supply system. At the time of the dedication of the systems to the VILLAGE, the costa of same will be sub- mit%ed by the OWNER to the of Utilities for approval, unit basis at the time the VILLAGE's Engineer and Superintendent and the credit shall be applied on per f~4NER requests a Certificate of Occupancy. The charge.~ to be paid by the OWNER for the hookup of , water supply and connection of a sewage collection system for the ~ accegaory atructure, on the OWNER'S prmmiae, as de,cribed in Schedule A, in their present usage, such sa the recreation building, tennis building, stable, buildings, barns and the Superintendent of charges will be based courts, security guardhouse, maintenance equestrian cent.r, exllting dwellings, other appurtenances, will be established by Utilities. The determination of these on the u~e and water/sewage requirements of the structure to he serviced Superintendent of Utilities of said Appendix 1 which is attached hereto and a determination of the VILLAGE charges will set forth in and made a part hereof. C. If the VILLAGE allows any third parties to connect end uss the facilities of the lift station(a) or any force sewage main servicing the OW~;ER'a property, the VILL~E shall impose a charge upon the third parties baaed upon the percentage of load flow used by the third 9artie~ as is related to the total flow of the lift station(s) repayment shall be the third parties' station(s), and/or force main. The percentage of in the same Droportion ee the uercentsgs of flow is to the total flow of the lift end force main. Said reimbursement ~bell be paid an annual basis ~ver a period not monies shall be paid to the OWNER 30) day~ of collection from said to exceed ten by the VILLAGE third parties. (10) years. Said within thirty 6IXTH~ The VILLAGK agrees to supply fire hydrants for the ~netallations as mhown on Exhibit B. The coat of the fir. hydrants, together w~th the delivery charges shall be pa~d by th. OWNER who aqree~ to reimburse the VILLAG~ mt the VILLAGe's actual co~t, which costa shall be .u b mitred to the C~N~R for Dayment. The VILLAGE shall deliver the hydrants to the site at the time appropriate for the expeditious completion of the WORK, provided the VILLAGE is given at least 21 days notice and subject to the availability of the hydrants from the suppliers to the VILLAGE. Until such time as the rental for the fire hydrants is paid for by the East-Meet Fire Protection District, the O~4NER will pay to the VILLAGE such rental for each fire hydrant as is from time to time being paid by such District to the VILLAGE for other hydrants in the District. SEVENTH! All WORK shall be inspected by the VILLAG~ which hereby designates its Superintendent of Utilities or his designee, with full power of inepectiom hereunder. The OWNER will grant access for purposes of inspection to all parts of the premises and the WOR~. The VILLAG~ shall have an authorized inspector at the site st all proper times ~o aa not to delay the WORK. No backfilling shall be dome until the pipe and the WORK in the trenches have been approved and tasted or prior permission has been obtained from the Inspector. ~ The OWNER agrees to pay the VILLAGE's coats for all inspection fees charged by the VILLAGE, which costa shall be baaed on mn hourly charge to be submitted to the OWNER periodically in advance of the inspec- tions. EIG~T~ A one inch service line shall be installed to each dwelling unit amd appurtenant structures under the direction end supervi.iom of the VILLAGE, with s curb stop to be located at a place approved by the VILLAGE. NINT~z The VILLAGE will supply without sufficient water to make all tests that are VILLAGE, or sny other governmental agenoy, for and approval of the water supply system and the system. charge to the OT~ER required by the the installation, sanitary sewage TENTH~ The OWNER agrees, upon written approval of the completed WORK by the VILLAGE and compliance with all other pro- visions of this agreement, the OWNER will formally dedicate to the VILLAGE, and the VILLAGE will accept, the entire water supply/distribution ,yetem, and the ~ntire sanitary sewage collection system. The OWNER shall e~ecute such inmtruments transferring to the VILLAGE all of its right, title and interest to the water supply distribution and sanitary sewage collection systems, including but not limited to the water wells, mains, lift station(s), appurtenances, free and clear of all encumbran- ces and liens. At the same.time, the OWNER will grant and convey to the VILLAGE easements and rights-of-way for ~be purpose of laying, relaying, repairing, operating, maintaining water supply well or wells, water mains, distribution system lines, sanitary sewage collection facilities and apDurtenancem, including domestio services and fire hydrants, and any other rights-of-way and easements, the VILLAGE needs or req~lre~ for hookup 6f the systems to its other water mains and sewage mains. The aforesaid right.-of-way and easements shall extend five feet on either ~lde Of the water and sewer mainm to be installed pursuant to this -9- agreement, whether or not such distance shall be within the road- way. However, with regards to the water supply site(s), the ease- ments shall be for s two hundred (200) foot radius from the sit. of well point(s). The maine, appurtenances, easements and rights- of-way shall be granted to the VILLAGB, its successors and assigns, in perQetutty. The easements granted herein are not exclusive; however, no other poles or cables are to be set within seven feet of either side of any water or sewer msia. If utility, sewer or other services necessarily cross the water mains, the OWNER will advise the VILLAGE in writing of the exact location of such inter.action, and upon Installation shall supply maps to the VILLAGE showing the exact locations. Said intgrsec- tions shall not be permitted without tbs prior written consent of the VILLAGE, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. ELEVENT~ The WORK covered by this menced within one year from thm date of contemplated 350 units will constructed agreement mhall be cpm- this agreement end it is on tbs following schedule I00 unite with[n three years of date of this agreement, 125 addi- tional units within six years of the date of this agreement, 125 units within nine years of the date of this agreement. The development of the recreational building, existing dwellings, buildings, and accessory structures, will be aa reguired by the If the NORK contemplated in this agreement for installs- the water supply end .swage collection systems shall be sta~ss, it is mutually agreed and understood that ali tion of done in -10- specifications and references to materials used for the construc- tion of said systems and the WORK to be completed thereon Will be changed to conform to the then currant standards set by th. VILLAGe. The VILLAGE will notify the OWNER of any changes from the plans and specifications which have b.en previously approved by the VILLAGE. Should the OWNER desire to lay the mains or sewage collection facilities in sections, ~eparste construction contracts may be let if In the opinion of the VILL~,E Engineer and Superintendent of Utilities ~uch sections will provide for the prodsr water supply and sewage collection in conformance with the Overall plan. ~4ELFT~ Upon completion, inspection and approval of the WORK, the Village shall operate the water supply system, the sanitary Sewage collection system to the development, and the individual owners of the units and buildings. The VILLAGE shall charge the rates applicable to all other such owners similarly situated pursuant to the rules and regulations of the VILLAGE in force and effect from time to time. THIRTEENTH, This agreement contains the complete understand- lng between the parties for the acquisition by the VILLAGE of the water supply and sanitary sewage collection systems and fire hydrants hereinbefore described. The OWWER agree~ it will not make any claims ,gainer the VILLAGE on account of the installa- tion of the water supply, wells, sanitary sewage system, other than as Orovlded for tn this agreement. FOURTEENTR~ This agreement shall lnure to the benefit and -ti- ceaeore and aaalyne of the Park/es. IS ~/T~sS W~R~0~, the Parties have in four counterparts, all of Which "hall day and Year f/ret above written. heirs, legal representatives, eUc- executed this agreement constitute original , th, VILLAGE OF GREENPORT ,TE OF NE~ YORKt COUNTy OF SUFFOLK, GREENPORT D/~V/~LOPMENT CORp. ~Y ~ ol ' ~ ' On the GEORGE H.~ .... day of March, 19 COrporation; that the seal so e-w the Seal of said ~-cees of ~atd co.-~c w~s so affixed by order of the board of by like order. ' ~poratlon, and that he ~lgned hie name thereto STATE OF ,~q--~ On the V day of March, 20LDIR WOLOWIT~, to me known, ,did depose and ea¥ that westbur¥, New York; that abe NANCy ~. COOk' Not~ry PUblic, State of Suff~ik County No N. %'. Term · 4735161 Explm. s March 30, 1977 1986, before me Per~Onally came who, being by me duly SWorn, reside, at 6 Park Drive Es.t, Old l~ the Secretary of GREENPO~T -12- NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253~01 PECONIC LANDING EXHIB, ITC FF, ELIMINAF, Y 5FACE ?F. OGF-,AM T~l~O~ (~16) 727-2209 ru~b (~16) 727-01,44 UOWARD W. YOUNO, L,md THOI~A.~ e. WOLI~RT, P[Q~OMI K~NIIETU [. ASRUZZO, LaM JOUI. I g(~UUURR, Leml ATTN: Mr. John W. Naylor, Jr., P.E. Naylor Engineering 3 Long Pond Road Ridge, New York 11961-1828 March 23, 1998 RE: PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (97-0290) Dear Mr. Naylor: Enclosed is a copy of the Preliminary Space Program prepared by the architect for the above referenced project. This information is provided for your use in verifying the preliminary sanitary design flow calculations prepared by us. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us. Very truly yours, TCW/nac Encl. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. PECONIC LANDING Preliminary Space Program for 250 Independent Living Units SUMMARY Total NSF A. RESIDENTIAL A.1 Apartments 156,300 Total Net SF 156,300 Grossing Factor x 1.20 Total Gross SF 187,560 A.2 Cottages 204,450 Total Net SF 204,450 Grossing Factor x 1 Total Gross SF 204,450 TOTAL GROSS SF - RESIDENTIAL 392,010 B. COMMUNITY CENTER B.1 Entrance Facilities 1,400 B.2 Administration 2,360 B.3 Public/Commons Facilities 13,600 B.4 Recreational Facilities 11,200 B.5 Receiving/Dietary/Housekeeping 8,350 B.6 Maintenance/Engineering 2,280 Total Net SF 39,190 Grossing Factor x 1.35 TOTAL GROSS SF - COMMUNITY CENTER 52,907 C. HEALTH CENTER C.3 Shared Facilities - Health Center Total Net SF Grossing Factor X 5,030 5,670 36,020 1.50 Revised March 5, 1997 Revised Mamh 6, 1997 Revised Mamh 20, 1997 Revised March 24, 1997 Revised June 18, 1997 Total GSF Development Plan 406,600 60,000 C.4 Resident Care Center C.5 Wellness/Fitness Center C.6 Child Day Care Center Total Net SF Grossing Factor Total Gross SF :: TOTAL GROSS SF~ HEALTH CENTER D. BRECKNOCK HALL D.1 Cultural/Ar~s Center TOTAL GROSS SF - BRECKNOCK HALL 2,155 3,680 1,480 7,315 1.20 8,778 62,808 14,000 14,000 42,500 0 PECMHSUM.XLS pECMHSUM Page 1 6/18/97 1:41 PM PECONIC LANDING Prelimina~J Space Program for 250 Independent Uving Units Facility/Space A. RESIDENTIAL A.1. Apartments 2. 3. 4. 5. One Bedroom, One Bath One Bedroom and Den Two Bedmom, Two Bath Two Bedroom and Den, Two Bath Three Bedroom, Two Bath Subtotal (Net Square Feet) A.2. Cottages One Bedroom Two Bedroom, Two Bath Small Two Bedroom and Den, Two Bath Large Two Bedroom and Den Subtotal (Net Square Feet) Total Units B. COMMUNITY CENTER B.1 Entrance Facilities 1. Lobby/Lounge 2. R~ceptio~/Switshboard/Concierge 3. Public Restrooms 4. Resident Mail Area Mall Room (U.S. Postal Service) Subtotal (Net Square Feet) B.2 Administration 1. Administrator Office 2. Marketing Director Office 3. Secretary/Reception Area 4. Secretary Areas 5. Comptroller Office 6. Accounting Staff Pemonnel Manager Office 8. Personnel Staff 9. Medicare Manager Office 10. Auxiliary Office 11. Conference/Boardroom 12. Co.operative Office 13. Toilet Room 14. Staff/Marketing Conference Room 15. Work/Copy Room 16. ComputsdFile Server/Storage Subtotal (Net Square Feet) B.3 Public/Commons Facilities 1. Gathering Room 2. Chair/Equipment Storage 3. Formal Dining Room (1) 4. Informal Dining Room (1) 5. Pdvate Dining Room (1) 6. Extedor Dining Patio 7. Living Room/Lounge Subtotal (Net Square Feet) 7B. Library 8. Coat Area 9. Public Toilet Rooms Sq Ft/ Unit 250 Units NSF 20 800 16,000 2O 900 18,000 35 1,150 40,250 40 1,350 54,000 17 1,650 28,050 132 156,300 0 900 0 15 1,300 19,500 53 1,650 87,450 50 1,950 97,500 118 204,450 250 1 1 0 1 1 2 3 2 1 1 2 4 1 360,750 8OO 150 3OO 3OO 150 180 150 100 8O 100 80 120 8O 8O 120 30O 100 5O 250 150 100 3,000 3OO 6OO 6OO 6OO 6OO 1,250 1,600 2OO 30O Revised Febmary 13,1997 Revised Feb~a~ 25,1997 Revised Mamh 20,1997 Revised June 18,1997 Remar~ Adjacentto B.3 800 150 0 See B.3.9 300 With community builedn board, could be incorporated into Lobby/Lounge area 150 180 150 100 160 Workstations 100 240 Workstations 120 160 Workstations 80 Workstation 120 300 100 For Resident's Association 50 250 15 people at 15 sf/person 150 100 2,360 3,000 300 people at 10 sf/person 300 For gathering mom 1,200 30 people at 20 sf/person 2,400 30 people at 20 sf/person 600 30 people at 20 sf/person (potentia~ to divide into two spaces) 600 30 people at 20 sf/person 1,250 Could be 2-3 intemonnected moms 9,350 1,600 2OO 6OO Locate adjacent to Living Room/Lounge PECMHPG.XLS PECMHPG Page 1 6/18/97 1:42 PM PECONIC LANDING Preliminary Space Program for 250 independent Living Units Revised February 13, 1997 Revised February 25, 1997 Revised March 2011997 Revised June 18, 1997 250 Sq Ft./ Units FacilitT/$rneCe QT' Unit NSF Remarks 10. Bank/Bmkerage I 100 100 11. Beably/Barber Salon 1 350 350 12. Convenience Market/Gift Shop 1 600 600 Pharmacy - see C.4.11 13. Storage 1 100 100 For Market/Gift supplies 14. Cart Parking 1 200 200 15. Chapel/Meditation 1 500 500 Subtotal (Net Square Feet) 4,250 TOTAL B. 3 (Net Square Feet) B.4 Recreational Facilities 1. Swimming Pool 1 6,000 2. Lacker/Toilet Rooms 2 300 3. Exercise Room 1 900 4. Physical Therapy I 600 5. Craft Rooms 2 900 6. Shop (Wood/Metal) 1 900 7. Tennis Courts 2 8. Billiard Room 1 400 Subtotal (Net Square Feet) (1) Vedfy seating capacity: items B.3.2 through B.3.6 include seating for 240. B.5 Recalv[ng/Dietary/H ousekeeping 1. Food Preparetioo/Storage 1 4,000 13,600 2. Receiving Area I 500 500 3. Breakdown/Staging Room 1 400 400 4. Central Supply Room 1 400 400 5. Waste Management I 100 100 6. Clean Linen Holding 1 150 150 7. Soiled Linen Holding I 150 150 8. Laundry 1 900 900 9. Housekeeping Storage 1 400 400 10. Janitor Closet 0 0 0 11. Employee Locker/Toilet Rooms 2 300 600 12. Employee Lounge 1 300 300 13. Employee Education Room 1 300 300 14. Record Storage 1 150 150 Subtotal (Net Square Feet) 8,350 Adjacent to Resident Care (C.4) and Wellness Centers (C.5) 6,000 600 900 600 1,800 Single space st~bdivisible into 2 spaces 900 Locate adjacent to Maintenance/ Engineering areas Extedor 400 11,200 4,000 Includes 'scramble' servery. Locate immed adjacent to Dining Areas B.3.3, 4, 5 and accessible to C,3.3. Shares receiving area (B.5.2),Potential reduction based on dining mix(formal/informal)and number of seatings. Anteroom to extedor dumpster/compactor Included in Housekeeping Storage provide kitchenette area & vending machines Fire-resistant construction B.6 Maintenance/Engineering 1. Facility Manager Office 1 120 120 2. Maintenance Director Office 1 80 80 3. Housekeeping Director Office 1 80 80 4. Conference/Plan Room 1 250 250 5. Secretadal/Receptioo Area 1 150 150 6. Carpentry Shop 1 400 400 7. Electrical Shop 1 400 400 8. Paint Shop 1 400 400 9. Supply/Parts Storage 1 400 400 Subtotal (Net Square Feet) 2,280 Workstation Workstation 15 people at 15 sf/person Workstation and seating area for 4or 5people include paint booth C. HEALTH CENTER C.1 Skilled Care Center I ~ Private Resident Rooms 32 beds; 2 units of 16 rooms; 4 clusters of 8 rooms PECMHPG.XLS PECMHPG Page 2 6/18/97 1:42 PM PECONIC LANDING Preliminary Space Program for 250 Independent Living Units Revised February 13, 1997 Revised February 25, 1997 Revised March 20, 1997 Revised June 18, 1997 Facilit,//Space Q~' 2. ~.: sero pr vate ReS dent R0~m ~ 16 3. Isolation Patient Room 1 4. Team/Charting Room 1 5. CNA Substations 4 6. Staff Toilet Rooms 2 7. Staff Lounge 1 8. Conference/Consult Room 1 9. Clean Workrooms 4 10. Soiled Workrooms 4 11. Medications 1 12. Equipment Storage Room 1 13. Nourishment Station 0 14. Resident Bathing/Spa Rooms 2 15. Activity Room 1 16. Activity Director Office 1 17. Resident Toilet Rooms 2 18. Equipment Alcoves 4 19. Solariurn/Lounge 2 20. Nursing Director Office 1 21. Health Care Secretary 1 22. Janitor Closets 2 23. Resident Laundry Room 2 24. Lobby 1 ~ ~ Subtotal (Net square Feet)i C.2 Assisted Living Center 25O Sq Ft/ Units Unit NSF 2. Aide Workrooms 3. Clean Linen 4. Soiled LinerVWorkrooms 5. Resident Laundry Room 6. Tub/Bath and Toilet/Spa 7. Parlors 8. Janitor/Housekeeping Rooms 9. Elevators/Lobbies 500 · 300 250 50 50 20O 120 50 100 120 100 0 3O0 500 8,000 300 Full Bath&CNA Sink 250 200 100 20O 120 200 400 120 100 0 600 500 100 100 5O 100 50 200 150 300 120 120 100 100 60 120 120 240 200 200 !!!~ i 14,320 Incorporate into pantry; see C.3.4 16-17 people at 30 sf/person; noisy room Use Dining Area (C.3.3) for quieter activities Quiet room 24 Apartments - 2 Story BIdg· 800 :.;:6;400 One bedrrn, apartment, bathrm, w/oversized 500~: ; 8,000 shower, kitchenette, living area, bedrm, w/ 120 50 60 200 0 150 60 200 walk-in closet 240 100 120 200 0 Ati bathing in rooms 450 Quiet room/Living Room 120 400 C.3 Shared Facilities - Health Center 1. Lobby/Reception Area 2. Resident Storage 3. Dining Rooms 5. 6. 7. Pantry/Food Prep/Nourishment Public Toilet Rooms Wheelchair/Cart Parking Resident Mail Center Subtotal (Net Square Feet) C.4 Resident Care Center 1. Lobby/Waiting Area 2. Secretary/Reception Area 3. Visitor Toilet Rooms 4. Work/Records Storage 5. Consultation Room 6. Patient Toilet Room 7. Staff Toilet Room 7. Health Service Admin. Office 8. Nurse Practitioner Office 9. Social Workers Offices 70 4 2 2 1 2O0 30 500 500 50 120 150 150 100 50 150 150 50 50 120 100 100 200 2,100 Possible remote location 2,000 70 beds at 28 sf/bed; design as a series of connected, smaller "rooms" or areas 1,000 Serviced by Central Kitchen (B.5.1) 100 120 150 5,670 150 10 people at 15 sf/person 100 100 150 150 50 50 120 100 200 PECMHPG.XLS PECMHPG Page 3 6/18/97 1:42 PM PECONIC LANDING Preliminary Space Program for 250 Independent Living Units Facility/Space 10. Offices/Exam Rooms 11. Dental Treatment/Exam Room 11. Pharmacy/Medications 12. Equipment Storage 13. Weights/Measurements Alcove 14. Janitor/Housekeeping Room 15. Mini Lab 16. C[ean Utility Room 17. Soiled Utility Room 18. Draw Station 19. View Box Alcove Subtotal (Net Square Feet) C.5 Wellness/Fitness Center 1. PT/OT Offices 2. Hydrotherapy 3. PT Exercise Treatment 4. OT Activity Room 5. PT/OT Storage 6. OT Patient Toilet/Bath Room 8. Exercise Room Subtotal (Net Square Feet) C.6 Child Day Care Center 1. Infant Room 2. Toddler Room 3. Toilet Rooms 4. Office 5. Kitchen 6. Lobby Subtotal (Net Square Feet) D.1 Brecknock Hall 1. Cultural/Arts Center Sq Ft/ Qty. Unit 4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 250 Units NSF Revised February 13, 1997 Revised February 25, 1997 Revised March 20, 1997 Revised June 18, 1997 120 120 200 100 25 60 200 100 100 80 80 480 To be shared by physicians; includes exam table and desktop area with stor cabinets 120 200 Verify storage needs 100 25 60 Share with C.5 0 Future 0 Future 0 Future 0 Future 0 Future 2,155 100 1,000 1,000 4O0 100 80 900 400 500 60 120 100 120 14,000 200 1,000 1,000 400 With ki~hen 100 80 900 3,680 Forchitdran ofemployees 400 500 240 120 100 120 1,480 14,000 To be Vedtied PECMHPG.XLS PECMHPG Page 4 6/18/97 1:42 PM NAYI_OR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO~ 253~01 PECONIC LANDING EXHII~IT O COST ESTIMATE5 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 263-01 PECONIC LANDING LAKE PANAMOKA 06-05-98 253-01 NA ESTIMATE WORKSHEET AI.TERNATIVES ANALYSIS WASTE'WATER PHMPING AND CONVEYANCE FACILITIES PECONIC LANDING, SOUTHOLD, LONG ISI),NI) n-r~ Al - North Side of Route 25 x3^T%6-01 - 98 09-01-98 JO~P4 w. NAYLOR, JR., P.E. SttEET NO. 1 OF 4 QUANTITY NLhTERIAL LABOR DESCRIPTION OF WORK NO. LINIT PER PER SUBTOTA1.S LINITS MEAS. I~'IT SUBTOTAI.S LINIT SUBTOTAI,S Jacking 80 I.F. 53.00 4,240.00 245.79 19,663.20 23,903.2C Jacking and Receixdng Pits 1 Job 3,000.00 3,000.00 22,ooo.o0 22,000.00 25,000.0C 4' Dia. PVC Main 2,103 L.F. 3.38 7,108.14 3.74 7,865.22 14,973.3f 4" Dia. Fittings 17 30.42 517.14 7.48 127.16 644.3C Clean Outs 6 EA. 400.00 2,400.00 300.00 1,800.0C 4,200.0(2 Excavation (Ha~d) 0 Cu. Yd. 0.00 0.00 41.00 0.0C 0.0C Excavation (Machine) 2,797 Cu.Yd. 0.00 0.00 4.47 12.502.55 12,502.5~c Bacldill (Hrmd) 699 Cu. Yd. 0.00 0.00 l~.64 10,932.36 10.932.36 aliickfill ( NLachine) 2,098 Cu. Yd. 0.00 0.00 1.79 3,735.42 3,733.42 ~l~.pacUon 2,797 Cu. Yd. O.00 0.00 3.42 9,565.74 9,565.74 Pavement / Sidewalk / Driveway Restoration O S.F. 1.78 0.00 1.51 O.OC O.OC Air Release Chamber 1 EA. 2,000.o0 2,0OO.00 2,000.00 2,0OO.0C 4,000.0C S[IBTOTAL 109,476.9~ SUBCONTRACTOR O & P (10 % + 10 % 22,990.16[ I SHBTOTAI 132~467.13 GENERAL CONTRACTOR O & P (10 % ~ 13,246.71 TOTAl 145~713.85 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253~01 PECONIC LANOING LAKE PANAMOKA 06-0%98 253-01 NA ESTIMATE WORKSHEET ,5~,TERNAT1VES ANALYSIS WASTEWATF~R PUMPING AND CONVEYANCE FACII.ITIES PECONIC ld~NI)ING, SOUTHOLD, I.ONG ISI~-NI) A2 - South Side of Route 25 a^T;)6 01 98 09-01 08 JO~rN W. NAYI.OR, JR., P.E. SIIEET NO. 2 OF 4 QI1ANTITY a,L~TERIAL LABOR DESCRIPTION OF W©RK N©. UNIT PER PER SUBTOTALS UNITS MEAS. UNIT SUBT©TALS UNIT SUBTOTALS Jacking 80 I..F. 53.00 4,240.00 245.79 19,663.20 23,903.2C Jacking and Recei~5 ng Pits 1 Job 3,000.00 3,000.00 22.ooo.oo 22,000.0(] 25,000.0£ 4 Dia. P'vC ,'ltdn 2,085 L.F. 3.38 7,047.30 3.74 7,797.9~ 14,845.2£ 4" Dia. Fittings 18 EA. 30.42 547.56 7.48 134.64 682 Clean Outs 6 EA. 400.00 2,400.00 300.00 1,800.0( 4,200.0£ Excavation (Hand) 924 Cu.Yd. 0.00 0.00 41.00 37,884.0C 37,884.0( Excavation (Mad~ine) 1,849 Cu.Yd. 0.00 0.00 4.47 8,265.03 8,265.0~ Backfill (Hm~d) 693 Cu. Yd. 0.00 0.00 15.64 10,838.5,2 10,838.52 i~ -kfill (Machine) 2,079 Cu. Yd. 0.OK) 0.00 1.79 3,721.41 3,721.411 ~,~pacxion 2,773 Cu.Yd. 0.00 0.00 3.42 9,483.66 9,483.66 Pavement / Sidewalk / Driveway Restoration 3,600 S.F. 1.78 6,408.00 1.51 5,436.0( l 1,844.00 Air Release Ch~unber I EA. 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,oo0.oo [ 2,000.0( 4,000.00 SUBTOTAl 154~667.22 SUBCONTRACTOR O & P (10 % + 10 %)i 32,480.12 I SUBTOTAL 187,147.34 GENERAL CONTRACT©R © & P (10 % ) 18,714.73 TOTAl. 205,862.07 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-0t PECONIC LANDING LAKE PANAMOKA 06-05 98 253 01 NA ESTIMATE WORKSHEET ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS WASTEWATER PUMPING AND CONVEYANCE FACILITIES PECONIC LAN1)ING~ SOUTHOLI)~ I.ONG ISLAND B1 - GRAVITY SE~R 09 01-98 JOHN W. NAYI OR, JR., P.E. 1-98 SIIEET NO. ~ OF 4 QUANTITY MATERIAL LABOR DESCRIPTION OF WORK NO. ~'IT PER PER SUBTOTAl UNITS MEAS. ~IT SUBT()TALS UNIT SUBTOTAI~ 8" Dia. PVC Gra~ty Sewer 1,296 L.F. 28.~ 36,339.84 6.74 8,735.04 45,074.88 5 D~a. ~ ~m holes 6 EA. 1,393.~ 8,358.00 928.~ 5,568.0~ I 3,926.0( Pavement Sawcmtling 2,592 L.F. 0.45 1,166.40 3.26 8,449.92 9,616.32 Excava~on (MacNne) 1,552 Cu.Yd. 0.~ 0.00 4.47 6,937.~ 6,937.~~ Excava~on (H~d) 172 Cu. Yd. 0.~ 0.~ 41.00 7,052.~ 7,052.~ ~c~ (H~d) 431 Cu. Yd. 0.~ 0.~ 15.64 6,740.84 6,740.84 BacHill (MacNne) 1,293 Cu.Yd. 0.00 0.~ 1.79 2,314.45 2,314.47] Compamion 1,724 Cu. Yd. 0.~ 0.~) 3.42 5,896.08 5,896.08[ ~vcment Resloration 8(~ Sq. Yd. 11.99 10,359.36 28.95 25.012.8( 35,372.16 ~¢ D~ & Conne~l Io E~s~ng MH 1 EA. 150.~ 150.~) 550.~ 550.0( 700.~)i ItC Stubs 32 EA. 3(~.22 9,735.~ 106.66 [ 3,413.12 13,148.16i 4' Dia. House Conne~on 480 L.F. 11.81 5,668.80 3.94 1,891.2( 7,560.~ Excavation 638 Cu. Yd. 0.00 0.~ 4.47 2,851.8~ 2,851.86 Bac~fll (H~d) 1~) Cu. Yd. 0.00 0.~ 15.(~ 2,502.~ 2,502.40 ~c~ll (MacNne) 479 Cu. Yd. 0.~ 0.~ 1.79 857.41 857.41 Companion 638 Cu. Yd. 0.~ 0.~ 3.42 2,181.96 2,181.96 Pavement Resto~on 320 Sq. Yd. ll.99 3,836.8 28.95 9,2~ 13,1~.80 Pavement Remov~ 8~ Sq. Yd. 0.~ 0.~ 6.11 5,279.~ 5279.~ Refuse Remov~ 360 Sq. Yd. 0.~ 0.~ 8.27 2,977.20 2,977.20 SUBTOTAL $ I M,089.02 SUBCONTRACTOR O & P (10 % + 10 %) $ 38,658.69 SUBTOTAL $ 212,747.71 GENERAL CONTRACTOR O & P (10 % ) $ 22,274.77 TOTAl $ 245,012.49 NAYLOR ENGINEERING JOB NO~ 253~ 01 SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION PECONIC LANOING LAKE PANAMOKA 06 05 98 253-01 NA ESTIMATE WORKSHEET ,~L'rEBXAm'}~S ANAI.YSIS ¥~'ASTEWATER PUMPING AND CONVEYANCE FACILITIES PECONIC LANDING, SOUTHOLI), LONG ISlaND ~rm B2 - FORCE MAIN llArr06-01-98 09-01-98 JOIINW. NAY1.OR JR. P.E. SIIEETNO. 4 OF 4 QUANTITY MATERIAL LABOR DESCRIPTION OF WORK NO. UNIT PER PER SLIBTOTAI,S UNITS MEAS. UNIT SUBTOTALS UNIT SUBTOTALS 4 Dta. P'~,(. Force :.lain 1,296 I.F. 3.38 4,380.48 3.74 4,847.04 9,227.52 5' Dia. Cleanouts 6 EA. 400.130 2,400.00 300.00 1,800.0t2 4,20( Pax, ement Sawculting 2,592 I..F. 0.45 1,166.40 3.26 8,449.92 9,616.321 Excavation (Machine) 172 Cu.Yd. 0.00 0.00 41.00 7,052.0C 7,052.00 Excavation (Machine) 1,552 Cu.'x'd. 0.00 0.00 4.47 6,937.44 6,937.44[ Bacldill (t land) 431 Cu. Yd. 0.00 0.00 15.64 6,740.84 6,740.84 Backdill (Machine) 1,293 Cu. Yd. 0.00 0.00 1.79 2.314.4'~ 2,314.47 Compaction 1,724 Cu. Yd. 0.00 0.00 3.42 5,896.08 5,896.08 ~l~.ement Restorarkm 8(5[ Sq. Yd. 11.99 10,359.36 28.95 25,012.8C 35,372.16 ~re D~51I & Connec~t to Existing MI I 1 EA. 150.00 150.00 550.00 550.0C 700.00 Pavement Removal 864 Sq. Yd. 0.00 0.00 6. I 1 5,279.04 5,279.04 Refuse Removal 360 Sq. Yd. 0.00 0.00 8.27 2,977.20 2,977.20 SUBTOTAL $ 96,313.07 SUBCONTRACTOR () & P 110% + 10%) $ 20.225.74 SUBTOTAL $116,538.81 GENERAL CONTRACTOR O & P (10 % ) $ 11,653.88 I I TOTAL $128,192.70 NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING EXHIBIT E SITE PLAN NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNEC'ilON JOB NO. 253-0t PECONIC LANDING EXHIBIT F CaTaLOG CUTS FOR PUMPING EQUIPMENT BARNES® 4SCC SUBMERSIBLE CUTTER PUMPS SECTION 'lJ PAGE 1 DATE 2197 REPLACES 6~96 Series: 4SCC 4.2HP 1'150 RPM Series: 4SCC 4.SHP '1750 RPM Description: SUBMERSIBLE CUTTER PUMPS DESIGNED FOR HEAVILY SOLIDS LADEN WASTEWATER APPLICATIONS. Sample Specifications: Section 1 Page 13. :ifications: DISCHARGE: LIQUID TEMPERATURE: VOLUTE: MOTOR HOUSING: SEAL PLATE: IMPELLER: Design: Matedah CUTTER CONE: CUTTER BLADE: SHAFT: SQUARE RINGS: HARDWARE: LIFTING DEVICE: PAINT: SEAL: Design: Materiah Inboard: Ou~oa~: CABLE ENTRY: SPEED: UPPER BEARING: Design: Lubrication: Load: LOWER BEARING: Design: Lubrication: Load: MOTOR: Design: Insulation: THREE PHASE: MOISTURE SENSOR: TEMPERATURE SENSOR: OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT: 4" (102mm) 1251b Flange, Horizontal. 104°F (40°C) Continuous. Cast Iron ASTM A-48, Class 40B. Cast Iron ASTM A-48, Class 25. Cast Iron ASTM A-48, Class 25. 2 Port, Enclosed, Dynamically Balanced, ISO G6.3. Austenitic Cast Iron ASTM A436-80-55-06. Integral with Impeller, Hardened Steel 52/53 Rockwell "C". Hardened Steel, 45/47 Rockwell "C". 416 Stainless Steel Buna-N 300 Series Stainless Steel Yoke Air Dry Enamel. Tandem Mechanical, Oil Filled Reservoir. Rotating Face - Carbon Stationary Face - Stainless Steel Elastomer- Buna-N Hardware - 300 Series Stainless Rotating Face -Tungsten Carbide Stationary Face - Tungsten Carbide Elastomer- Buna-N Hardware - 300 Series Stainless 30 ft. (9M) Cord, Pressure Grommet For Sealing And Strain Relief. 1150 and 1750 RPM (Nominal). Single Row, Ball Grease Radial Double Row, Ball Grease Radial & Thrust NEMA B-Three Phase, Torque Curve. Air-Filled, Squirrel Cage Induction. Class F Dual Voltage 230/460, Includes Overload Protection in Motor. N/O, Requires Relay in Control Panel. N/C, Requires Relay in Control Panel. Seal Material, Impeller Trims, Additional Cable. J CRANE I PUMPS & SYSTEMS Barnes Pumps, Inc Distributor Sales & Service Dept. 420 Third Streel/P.O. Box 603 Piqua, Ohio 45356-0603 Ph: (937) 773-2442 Fax: (937) 773-2238 Barnes Pumps, Inc. Bid-To-Spec & Project Sales 1485 Lexington Ave. Mansfield, Ohio 44907-2674 Ph: (419) 774-1511 Fax: (419) 774-1530 I Barnes Canada, Inc. Pumps 83 West Drive I Bramalea, Ontario Canada L6T 2J6 Ph: (905) 457-5223 Fax: (905) 457-2650 SECTION 1J PAGE 2 DATE 2/97 REPLACES 1196 14.22 4.96 (36~) -1 -~ J II 12.00 23.73 .69 118) DIA. 8HOLES SPACED ON 7.50 1191) ' 1603) 9.00 (229) r~ 2~'~o' 4.i4 2.42 ~ 11~5) 3 (62) f (le9) Iinches (mm) MODEL PART HP VOLT PH RPM NEMA FULL LOCKED CORD CORD CORD NO. NO. (NOM) START LOAD ROTOR SIZE TYPE O.D. CODE AMPS AMPS 46CC4236A 094843 4.2 230 3 1150 G 12.8 63.0 14/4 SO 0.570 46CC4246A 094844 4.2 460 3 1150 G 6.4 31.5 14/4 SO 0.570 4SCC4834A 094850 4.8 230 3 1750 H 14.4 80.0 14/4 SO 0.570 46CC4844A 094851 4.8 460 3 1750 H 7.2 40.0 14/4 SO 0,570 Control Cable Size for all models is 14/3, SO, 0.53 O.D. NOTE: The use of a 4" Break Away Fitting (BAF-4) is required with these pumps. NOTE: A relay is required for use w~th Moisture Sensor. Recommended relay is Barnes Part number 064675. IMPORTANT ! 1 .) PUMP MAY BE OPERATED "DRY" FOR EXTENDED PERIODS WITHOUT DAMAGE TO MOTOR AND/OR SEALS. 2.) THIS PUMP IS APPROPRIATE FOR THOSE APPLICATIONS SPECIFIED AS CLASS I DIVISION II HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS. 3.) THIS PUMP IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THOSE APPLICATIONS SPECIFIED AS CLASS I DIVISION I HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS. 4.) INSTALLATIONS SUCH AS DECORATIVE FOUNTAINS OR WATER FEATURES PROVIDED FOR VISUAL ENJOYMENT MUST BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE ANSI/NFPA 70 AND/OR THE AUTHORITY RAVING JURISDICTION. THIS PUMP IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN SW1MMING POOLS, RECREATIONAL WATER PARKS, OR INSTALLATIONS IN WHICH HUMAN CONTACT WITH PUMPED MEDIA IS A COMMON OCCURRENCE. CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS Bames Pumps, Inc Distributor Sales & Service Dept. 420 Third Street/P.O. Box 603 Piqua, Ohio 45356-0603 Ph: (937) 773-2442 Fax: (937) 773-2238 Barnes Pumps, Inc. Bid-To-Spec & Project Sales 1485 Lexington ,ave. Mansfield, Ohio 44907-2674 Ph: 1419) 774-1511 Fax: 1419) 774-1530 Barnes Pumps Canada, Inc. 83 West Drive Bramalea, Ontario Canada L6T 2J6 Ph: 1905) 457-6223 Fax: (905) 457-2650 SECTION IJ PAGE 4 DATE 2~97 REPLACES t/96 TOTA HEAD PERFORMANCE CURVE Series: 4SCC, 4.8HP, 1750 RPM 18 16 14 12 l0 8 4 2 U.S. GALLONS 300 379 450 PER MINUTE LITERS I I PER SECOND 5 '10 15 20 25 Testing is performed with water, specific gravity of 1.0 @ 68° F, other fluids may vary performanco. CRANE I PUMPS & SYSTEMS Barnes Pumps,/nc Distributor Sales & Service Dept. 420 Third Street/P.O. Box 603 Piqua, Ohio 45356-0603 Ph: (937) 773-2442 Fax: (937) 773-2238 Barnes Pumps, Inc. Bid-To-Spec & Project Sales 1485 Lexington Ave. Mansfield, Ohio 44907-2674 Ph: (419) 774-1511 Fax: (419) 774-1530 Barnes Pumps Canada, Inc. 83 West Drive Bramalea, Ontado Canada L6T 2J6 Ph: (905) 457-6223 Fax: (905) 457-2650 BARNES 4SCD SUBMERSIBLE CUTTER PUMPS SECTION 1J PAGE 5 DATE 2197 REPLACES 6~96 Series: 4SCD, 4.2HP 1150 RPM Series: 4SCD, 4.8HP '1750 RPM Description: SUBMERSIBLE CUTTER PUMPS DESIGNED FOR HEAVILY SOLIDS LADEN WASTEWATER APPLICATIONS. Sample Specifications: Section 1 Page 13. Specifications: DISCHARGE: LIQUID TEMPERATURE: VOLUTE: MOTOR HOUSING: SEAL PLATE: MPELLER: Design: Material: CUTTER CONE: CUTTER BLADE: SHAFT: SQUARE RINGS: HARDWARE: LIFTING DEVICE: PAINT: SEAL: Design: Materiah Inboard: Outboard: CABLE ENTRY: SPEED: UPPER BEARING: Design: Lubrication: Load: _OWER BEARING: Design: Lubrication: Load: MOTOR: Design: Insulation: i'HREE PHASE: MOISTURE SENSOR: TEMPERATURE SENSOR: OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT: 4" (102mm) 1251b Flange, Horizontal. 104°F (40°C) Continuous. Cast Iron ASTM A-48, Class 40B. Cast Iron ASTM A-48, Class 25. Cast Iron ASTM A-48, Class 25. 2 Port, Enclosed, Dynamically Balanced lSD G6.3. Austenitic Cast Iron ASTM A436-80-55-06. Integral with Impeller, Hardened Steel 52/53 Rockwell "C". Hardened Steel, 45/47 Rockwell "C". 416 Stainless Steel Buna-N 300 Series Stainless Steel Yoke Air DP/Enamel. Tandem Mechanical, Oil Filled Reservoir. Rotating Face - Carbon Stationary Face - Stainless Steel Elastomer - Buna-N Hardware - 300 Series Stainless Rotating Face - Tungsten Carbide Stationary Face - Tungsten Carbide Elastomer - Buna-N Hardware - 300 Series Stainless 30 ft. (9M) Cord, Pressure Grommet For Sealing And Strain Relief, 1150 and 1750 RPM (Nominal). Single Row, Ball Grease Radial Double Row, Ball Grease Radial & Thrust NEMA B-Three Phase, Torque Curve. Air-Filled, Squirrel Cage Induction. Class F Dual Voltage 230/460, Includes Ovedoad Protection in Motor. N/O, Requires Relay in Control Panel. N/C, Requires Relay in Control Panel. Seal Material, Impeller Trims, Additional Cable. I CRANE I PUMPS & SYSTEMS Barnes Pumps, Inc Distributor Sales & Service Dept. 420 Third Street/P.O. Box 603 Piqua, Ohio 45356-0603 Ph: (937) 773*2442 Fax: (937) 773-2238 Barnes Pumps, Inc. Bid-To-Spec & Project Sales 1485 Lexington Ave. Mansfield, Ohio 44907-2674 Ph: (419) 774-1511 Fax: (419) 774-1530 Barnes Pumps Canada, Inc. 83 West Drive Bramalea, Ontario Canada L6T 2J6 Ph: (905) 457-6223 Fax: (905) 457-2650 SECTION 1J PAGE 6 DATE 2/97 REPLACES 1196 14.22 .69 (18) DIA. 8HOLES SPACED ON 7.$0 (191) DIA. B.C. o 9'00 (229) 2.42 (62) 23.73 (603) 4.14 (105) 7.43 (189) l (nches (mm) MODEL PART HP VOLT PH RPM NEMA FULL LOCKED CORD CORD CORD NO. NO. (NOM) START LOAD ROTOR SIZE TYPE O.D. CODE AMPS AMPS 4SCD4236A 094845 4.2 230 3 1150 G 12.8 63.0 14/4 SO 0.570 4SCD4246A 094845 4.2 460 3 1150 G 6.4 31.5 14/4 SO 0.570 4SCD4834A 094852 4.8 230 3 1750 H 14.4 80.0 14/4 SO 0.570 ¢SCD4844A 094853 4.8 400 3 1750 H 7.2 40.0 14/4 SO 0.570 4SCD7134A 094854 7.1 230 3 1750 H 19.4 114.0 8/4 SO 0.780 4SCD7144A 094855 7.1 460 3 1750 H 9.7 57.0 8/4 SO 0.780 Control Cable Size for all models is 14/3, SO, 0.53 O.D. NOTE: The use of a 4" Break Away Fitting (BAF-4) is required with these pumps. NOTE: A relay is required for use with Moisture Sensor. Recommended relay is Barnes Part number 064675. IMPORTANT I 1 ) PUMP MAY BE OPERATED "DRY" FOR EXTENDED PERIODS WITHOUT DAMAGE TO MOTOR AND/OR SEALS 2.) THIS PUMP IS APPROPRIATE FOR THOSE APPLICATIONS SPECIFIED AS CLASS I D/VISION II HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS. 3.) THIS PUMP IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THOSE APPLICATIONS SPECIFIED AS CLASS I DIVISION I HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS. 4.) INSTALLATIONS SUCH AS DECORATIVE FOUNTAINS OR WATER FEATURES PROVIDED FOR VISUAL ENJOYMENT MUST BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE ANSI/NFPA 70 AND/OR THE AUTHORITY RAVING JURISDICTION. THIS PUMP IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE ~N SWIMMING POOLS, RECREATIONAL WATER PARKS, OR INSTALLATIONS IN WHICH HUMAN CONTACT WITH PUMPED MEDIA IS A COMMON OCCURRENCE. PUMPS & SYSTEMS Barnes Pumps, Inc Distributor Sales & Service Dept. 420 Third Street/P.O. Box 603 Piqua, Ohio 45356-0603 Ph: (937) 773-2442 Fax: (937) 773-2238 Bames Pumps, Inc. Bid-To-Spec & Projec~ Sales 1485 Lexington Ave. Mansfield, Ohio 44907-2674 Ph: (419) 774-1511 Fax: (419) 774-1530 Barnes Pumps Canada, Inc. 83 West Drive Bramalea, Ontario Canada L6T 2J6 Ph: (905) 457-6223 Fax: (905) 457-2650 SECTION AGE 8 ATE ~97 IREPLACES 1196 TOTAL HEAD MTRS FT PERFORMANCE CURVE Series: 4SCD, 4.8, 7.'IHP, 1750 RPM 2O t8 16¸ t4 12 t0 4 2 U.S. GALLONS 75 150 225 300 375 450 PER MINUTE I I I I I I LITERS 5 10 '15 20 25 PER SECOND Testing is performed with water, specific gravity of 1.0 @ 68° F, other fluids may vary performances. PUMPS & SYSTEMS Barnes Pumps, Inc Distributor Sales & Service Dept. 420 Third Street/P.O. Box 603 Piqua, Ohio 45356-0603 Ph: (937) 773-2442 Fax: (937) 773-2238 Bid-To-Spec & Project Sales 1485 Lexington Ave. Mansfield, Ohio 44907-2674 Ph: (419) 774-1511 Fax: (419) 774-1530 Barnes Pumps Canada, Inc. 83 West Drive Bramalea, Ontario Canada L6T 2J6 Ph: (905) 457-6223 Fax: (905) 457-2650 BARN ES® ^w^¥ Standard and Non-Sparking Models: BAF-4 & BAF-E4 Model: BAF-4 P/N: 087315 Model: BAF-E4 P/N: 087316 Description: THE BREAK AWAY FITTING IS DESIGNED TO ALLOW THE SUBMERSIBLE PUMP TO BE INSTALLED OR REMOVED WITHOUT REQUIRING PERSONNEL TO ENTER THE WET WELL. SECTION B PAGE 27 DATE 2~7 REPLACES 7~3 cifications: BAF-4; Standard The stationary portion of the BAF consists of a specially designed cast iron base elbow which is bolted to the floor of the wet well. The pump bolts to the cast iron moveable portion which is free to ride up and down the guide rails. An O-Ring is pressed into a dove-tailed groove on the tapered face of the moveable. The tapered faces of the moveable and base elbow allow for a positive mating of the O-Ring to base. This elastomer to cast iron contact assures a complete and positive sealwhich allows pumps to operate without hydraulic leakage, over wide range of discharge pressures. The guide rails aro attached to the base elbow at one end and to a stainless steel Guide Cap which is attached to the underside of the wet well cover at the other end. Both the Guide Cap assembly and the base elbow have cast iron plugs with O-Rings mounted in them which aid in locating the guide rails and in reducing noise and vibration of the guide roils. The guide rails serve only to guide, they carry none of the pump weight. 1-1/2" (38mm) schedule 40 pipe should be used for guide rails. An intermediate guide pipe bracket should be used for depths of 13 feet (4M) or more. BAF-E4; Non-Sparking The stationary portion of the BAF consists of a specially designed cast iron base elbow which is bolted to the floor of the wet well. The pump bolts to the bronze moveable portion which is free to ride up and down the guide rails. An O-Ring is pressed into a dove-tailed groove on the tapered face of the moveable. The tapered faces of the moveable and base elbow a ow for a positive mating of the O-Ring to base. This elastomer to cast iron contact assures a complete and positive sea which allows pumps to operate without hydraulic leakage, over wide range of discharge pressures. These mating parts also allow a Non-Sparking joint which is required in Hazardous Locations. The guide rails are attached to the base elbow at one end and to a stainless steel Guide Cap which is attached to the underside of the wet well cover at the other end. Both the Guide Cap assembly and the base elbow have cast iron plugs with O-Rings mounted in them which aid in locating the guide rails and in reducing noise and vibration of the guide rails. The guide rails serve only to guide, they carry none of the pump weight. 1-1/2" (38mm) schedule 40 pipe should be used for guide rails. An intermediate guide pipe bracket should be used for depths of 13 feet (4M) or more. See page 41 for OPTIONAL Intermediate Support. PUMPS & SYSTEMS Barnes Pumps, Inc Distributor Sales & Service Dept. 420 Third Street/P.O. Box 603 Piqua, Ohio 45356-0603 Ph: (937) 773-2442 Fax: (937) 773-2238 Barnes Pumps, Inc. Bid-To-Spec & Project Sales 1485 Lexington Ave. Mansfield, Ohio 44907-2674 Ph: (419) 774-1511 Fax: (419) 774-1530 Barnes Pumps Canada, Inc. 83 West Drive Bramalea, Ontario Canada L6T 2J6 Ph: (905) 457~223 Fax: (905) 457-2650 SECTION B PAGE 28 DATE 2~97 REPLACES 7/93 2 Holes to Accommodate ; ~:~J~ )1 3/8" (10) Anchor Bolts. 8.00 9.o9 ===~ ~1=~1 Bottom of Access Door. (67) I (45) -- 1301 Sch. 40 Pipe. 4 Slots To Accommodate 314" (19) Duplex = 17.62' (44s) to 26.12 (;s3) 9.00 Anchor Bolts. Triplex = 28.50 (724) (229) (1971 12.68 1.25 (32)~ 1.25 (32) · .- 1.44 Typ. 11.88 (302) ~ (37) (26) 22.12 (662) FOR 4SE10036EHA THRU 4SE25046EHA, 4SE25034EHA THRU 4SE100044EHA, XSE'I0036EHA THRU 4XSE25046EHA AND 4XSE25034EHA THRU 4XSE100044EHA. (99) inches (mm) 8 Slots on 7.50 (191) B.C. To Accommodate 518" (16) Bolts. 125 Lb. 4" (102) Raised Face Flange. 6.10 (100) 7.87 (2oo) 8.79 (223) CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS Barnes Pumps, Inc Dislributor Sales & Se~ice Dept. 420 Third Street/P.O. Box 603 Piqua, Ohio 45356-0603 Ph: (937) 773-2442 Fax: (937) 773-2238 Barnes Pumps, Inc. Bid-To-Spec & Project Sales 1485 Lexington Ave, Mansfield, Oh Jo 44907-2674 Ph: (419) 774-1511 Fax: (419) 774-1530 Barnes Pumps Canada, (nc. 83 West Drive IBramalea, Ontario Canada L6T 2J6 Ph: (905) 457-6223 Fax: (905) 457-2650 13ARNES® PUMP HOIST 1,500 lb Load Rating SECTION C PAGE 71 DATE W97- REPLACES 7~3 P/N: 079024 Specifications: CABLE: Lenght: Diameter: Matedah LOAD RATING: Light Duty Service: Position ~1: Position 2: Position 3: Heavy Duty Service: Position 1: Position 2: Position 3: MAXIMUM LIFT: Position 1: Position 2: Position 3: MAXIMUM REACH: Position 1: Position 2: Position 3: ~OTATION: ~OOM: OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT: With Snap Hook 36ft. (11M) 1/4 in. (6mm) Stainless Steel 1,500 lbs. (680kg) 1,200 lbs. (680kg) 900 lbs. (408kg) 1,000 lbs. (454kg) 800 lbs. (363kg) 600 lbs. (272kg) (Varies with size of the load) 59 in. (1499mm) 68 in. (1727mm) 76 in. (1930mm) 46 in. (1168mm) 58 in. (1473mm) 70 in. (1778) Boom rotates 240' for horizontal load movement. Angle adjusts 45°; telescopes to 3 lengths for optimum positioning over load. additional bases. In a typical application, one pedestal base is installed at each pump station, the hoist is designed to be moved from pump station to pump station, to raise and lower submersible pumps. Disc Brake Handle attached to the winch, gives control of the load for both lifting and Iowedng operations. Hand winch with Quick Disconnect cable anchor, allows operator to attach or remove cable. All components are either stainless steel, iridescent dichromate plated, or coated with a fusibond electrostatic finish. PUMPS & SYSTEMS Barnes Pumps, Inc Distributor Sales & Service Dept. 420 Third Street/P.O. Box 603 Piqua, Ohio 45356-6603 Ph: (937) 773-2442 Fax: (937) 773-2238 Barnes Pumps, Inc. Bid-To-Spec & Project Sales 1485 Lexington Ave. Mansfield, Ohio 44907-2674 Ph: (419) 774-1511 Fax: (419) 774-1530 Barnes Pumps Canada, inc. 83 West Drive Bramalea, Ontad~o Canada L6T 2J6 Ph: (905) 457-6223 Fax: (905) 457-2650 SECTION C PAGE 72 DATE 2~97 REPLACES 7~93 74.50 I I 13.5o C inches (mm) D PART A B1 B2 B3 C DI D2 D3 CRANE BASE NO. WEIGHT WEIGHT 079024 15.00 46.00 58.00 70.00 28.00 59,00 68.00 76.00 180 62 (381) (1168) (1473) (1778) (711) (1499) (1727) (1930) (82kg) (28kg) IMPORTANT I Crane is designed to lift rated capacity ONLY, if lifted weight binds or eliminated. CRANE I PUMPS & SYSTEMS Barnes Pumps, Inc Distributor Sales & Service Dept. 420 Third Street/P.O. Box 603 Piqua, Ohio 45356-0603 Ph: (937) 773-2442 Fax: (937) 773-2238 is seized, discontinue using crane .69 (18) Dia. ~ 14.50 (368) Barnes Pumps, Inc. Bid-To-Spec & Project Sales 1485 Lexington Ave. Mansfield, Ohio 44907-2674 Ph: (419) 774-1511 Fax: (419) 774-1530 until obstruction is 15.90 (404) Barnes Pumps Canada, Inc. 83 West Drive Bramalea, Ontario Canada L6T 2J6 Ph: (905) 457-6223 Fax: (905) 457-2650 BARNES® ACCESSORIES SECTION C PAGE 73 DATE 2/97 REPLACES 1196 CHAIN CABLE ROPE GUIDE RAIL PIPE :ations: Lifting Chain: 039238 056954 4/0 Galvanized Lifting Chain, 12001b. (644kg) Working Load for use with, up to 4" (102mm) Pumps. 3/8" (10mm) Galvanized Lifting Chain, 26001b (1179kg) Working Load for use with 6" (152rare) pumps. Lifting Cable: 074874 074878 074882 074886 1/8" (3mm) Stainless Steel Lifting Cable, 21001b. (953kg) Breaking Strength, for 60" (1524mm) thru 72" (1829mm) basin depths. 1/8" (3mm) Stainless Steel Lifting Cable, 21001b. (953kg) Breaking Strength, for 78" (1981mro) thru 96" (2438mm) basin depths. 1/8" (3mm) Stainless Steel Lifting Cable, 21001b. (953kg) Breaking Strength, for 102" (2591mm) thru 120" (3048mm) basin depths. 1/8" (3mm) Stainless Steel Lifting Cable, 21001b. (953kg) Breaking Strength, for 128" (3200mm) thru 144" (3658mm) basin depths. Lifting Rope: 3/8" (10mm) Tuff line polyprepylene rope, 3 strand twisted, breaking strength 2440 lbs. (1107kg) Safe working load is 1/5 breaking strength. Weight: .028 lbs per foot (.04kgs/meter}. 093973 15 ft. (4.5M) of rope with knots in 18" (457mm) increments. Guide Rail Pipe: 041839 042516 042259 042536 625-01225 042537 625-01224 042538 1" (25mm) Galvanized Schedule 40 Pipe. 1" (25mm) Stainless Steel Schedule 40 Pipe. 1-1/4" (32mm) Galvanized Schedule 40 Pipe. 1-1/4" (32mm) Stainless Steel Schedule 40 Pipe. 1-1/2" (38mm) Galvanized Schedule 40 Pipe. 1-1/2" (38mm) Stainless Steel Schedule 40 Pipe. 2" (51 mm) Galvanized Schedule 40 Pipe. 2" (51mm) Stainless Steel Schedule 40 Pipe, I CRANE I PUMPS&SYSTEMS Barnes Pumps, Inc Distributor Sales & Service Dept. 420 Third Street/P.O, Box 603 Piqua, Ohio 45356-0603 Ph: (937) 773-2442 Fax: (937) 773-2238 Barnes Pumps, Inc. Bid-To-Spec & Project Sa[es 1485 Lexington Ave. Mansfield, Ohio 44907-2674 Ph: (419) 774-1511 Fax: (419) 774-1530 Barnes Pumps Canada, Inc. 83 West Drive Bramalea, Ontario Canada L6T 2J6 Ph: (905) 457-6223 Fax: (905) 457-2650 Consolidated Electric Co. Bulletin I]100 - 9G Installation Instructions 9G Direct Acting Float Switch Installation Instructions and Accessories 141 South Lafayette Freeway St. Paul, MN 55107-1420 USA 9G Construction and Identification The 9t3 float is a mercury tilt type direct acting float switch with a 5½' Type 316 Stainless Steel ball which has continuously welded seams and is pressure tested to ensure leak-proof operation. New (as of 1989) is the Teflon coating which minimizes possible grease or de- bris build-up. With the improved Teflon coating comes a new means of identification. The Normally-Open (NO) float is identified by a Yellow marking band lo- cated around the neck of the float. The Normally-Closed (NC) float has a Red marking band. ~4void installing floats near a pump suction or other simi- lar location where the flow of liquid past the floats might cause towels, rags, etc., to be drawn around the float and prevent free operatiot~ The 9G has "Single LeveP (non-differentia/) Operation Each Model 9G Float Switch operates ON and OFF at about the same level. The difference between the ON and OFF setpoint (differential) is less than one inch. Applications Alarms. 'I~pically, one float is used to operate an alarm. Some applications may require the alarm to acti- vate on the alarm sensor and de-activate on a second float. In this case, a relay can be used in conjunction with the second sensor to provide differential setpoints. Single Pump or Valve Control. Since minor wave action could cause erratic ON/OFF operation, when floats are used to control a single pump, two floats are required for differential control in single pump applications. Multiple Pump or Valve Control. Similarly, several floats are required for multiple pump control. Here, the number of floats required depends on 1) the number of pumps in the system and 2) the pumping sequence (In- dependent ON/OFF, Common OFF, etc.). 612/224-9474 Fax 612J224-3628 Typical "C/amp and Socket'' Pipe-To-Wall Mounting Figure 1 Typical clamp and socket pipe-to-wall mounting installation of three floats in wot well of sewage lift station (plus an additional high alarm float ff desired). NOTE: Mount the float(s) away from walls and other objects and space them as far as possible from each other to avoid mechanical abuse in turbulent situations and possible .fouling in sticky media. Bulletin BIO0 - 9G Installation Instructions Cable Mounting The CBM Cable/Cast Iron Weight Suspension Kit .(601204-XX) provides drift free mounting and convert- rant removal for float switch adjustment. The cable/ weight suspension system also requires less space and no tangling problems when Compared to individually suspended float/weight mounting arrangements. Thc CBM Cable/Cast Iron Weight Suspension Kit includes: · a heavy-duty, stainless steel cable (20' standard length, longer lengths optionally available) · a plust isol-coated, 25# east iron weight with integral stain- less steel eannecting link · 4 - stainless steel cable ¢laml~ (2 for connection of lhe weight and 2 for a loop at lhe top end of the cable to suspend the assembly) The 9G-CC Stainless Steel Float Mounting Cable Clamp~ which mount thc floats to Iht cable are included as pert of the Suspension Type Model 9G Float Switch assembly. The CBM Cable/Weight Suspension Kit can accommodate up lo eight 9G Floals. Model CBM Stainless Steel Cab/e/Cast Iron Weight Suspension Mounting Kit PiN 601204-)0( ~- specify cable length Figure $ A duplex pump station control set is shown with independent ON float (for lead and lag pumps), a common OFF float and a high level alarm float. Figure 7 Mode/9G-CC F/oat- To- 1/8" Cable Stainless Steel C/amp Kit PIN 601212-01 Stainless Steel Cable C~amps (included with CBM Kit) Model 9G Float Switch /8 Stain~ How to Cable Mount a Float l. Connecting thc anchor. Mount the anchor to the cable by stringing the cable through lhe cnchor's s mounting eye and securing the cable to itself by fastening two of lhe four mount- ing claml~. 2. Connecting the upper support (customer supplied). Pa.va the cable through the eastomcr supplied mounting ring at thc top of thc tank and secure the cable to iuelf by fastening two of the four mounting clampe. 3. Mark thc float's operating poinl on the cable. Often, thc floats are mounted Io thc cable as thc cable rests on thc ground. The cable is then dropped into the tank and thc floats are wired 1o the COnlrol panel In order to position thc float correctly, mark the cable at the dusired float-moanting levels before clamping the floats to thc cable. 4. Assemble the float's cable mounting clamp. Each ileal has a cord gripping tube crimped to the cable. The float's cable mounting kit is assembled around the cord grip tube by follow- ing the iratructions provided with the mounting kit. The mounling kit is then l'mger tighlened to secure the float to the cable. 5. Orient the float. Note that each float has a tape marker with "For proper operation, install THIS SIDE UP." Rotate the float's cord gripping tube until the tape marker is on the top side of the float as it hangs freely in the wrtical position. 6. Tighten the assembly. While holding the float in the proper orientation (see #4 above), and at the proper operating set- point (see #3 above), tighten the nuts securely. 7. Secure the cable. Lash the ileal cables to the stainless sleel cable by using the cable ties included with each float. 3 Bulletin 8100 - 9G Installation Instructions ' ' 1" Pipe Mounted Dimensions 5Y2" diameter/~ / ¥ ~ur~ 8 Model gG-CL 1 or 9G-CL3 MounEng Clamp designed to hold 1 · diameter float mounting pipe (by others) to basin wall Model 9G Float Switoh with PIN 601184-01 1" Pipe Clamp Kit Wiring to the Controller Connect the black and white cable conductors to the proper terminals as shown on the project wiring dia- ram for the equipment installation. Connect the green conductor of each float to a grounding bar, and run a ground connection ns required by the National Electric Code. Testing and Connections Follow the operating instructions furnished with the Consolidated Electric Pump Controller or Powerpack panel. Iftbe float circuit oftbe Consolidated Electric Pump Controller/Alternator has a "closed-open- automatic" toggle-type test switch, which simulates the operation of the float circuit, leave the lest switches in the 'automatic' position after completion of testing. Observe the functioning of the complete system through several normal operating cycles to be certain all work is complete and the system operates properly. Caution/. While the switch will operate with the marker in any position, it will have normal operating characlcrislica only if the float marker is in the vertical position. A deviation from the vertical position of -+45' will not eft'ecl switch operation. Any position other than vertical requires a greater angle of lilt to operate the r switch thus affecting operation. Consolidated Electric Co. 141 South Lafayette Freeway St, Paul, MN 55107-1420 USA 612/224-9474 Fax 612/224-362.8 MB00062-190 Cat. FileBl.020 ©1990 Why the gG Float System is worth its price as a sewage- level- sensing pump control · Since its introduction in 1957, the Model 9G Direct Acting Float Switch has earned an enviable reputation as a reliable raw sewage or sludge wet well level sen- sing device. It has also found wide areas of applica- tion in process sumps, water reservoirs, irrigation ditches, hydropneumatic tanks, pneumatic sewage ejec- tors, etc., where its simplicity of operation, its quality and ruggedness of construction and its relia- bility of consistant performance has won the approval · of knowledgeable pump control specifiers and users. Some of the reasons users give for choosing the Model 9G Direct Acting Float Switch Control System on job after job can be stated under the following headings; · Reliability and Performance Record · Simplicity of Operation · Quality and Ruggedness · Maintainability and Convenience · Economy 1. Reliability & Performance Record Thousands of gG 0irect Acting Float Switches go to work each year in a variety of new applications. Some jobs are full of challenge - like sensing the level in a tannery waste sump where live steam is shot in each day to keep the stuff moving. Some jobs are as mundane as detecting levels in w~ter reservoirs or irrigation ditches and controlling pumps and alarms. In some 15 years of field experience, we have heard of only a few floats that have given any sort of trouble. Actually, I suppose over these 15 years we have heard of from IS to 30 individual floats (not systems) that have been In a few instances over the years, a float has shown up with holes eaten in one half of the float body and with the other half in sparkling- shiny good condition. These have evidently been mistakenly-made with ordinary steel on one half and type 316SS on the other. These are included in the total number of "bad units" over the years. We have seen the Model 9G Direct Acting Float Switch "glommed on" by grease, chicken feathers, and ether less mentionab)e things and are acquainted with only a handful of problems in 9G operation as referenced above. Floating grease is a real problem for conductivity type probes, sliding floats in guide pipes or cages, etc., but as floating grease would accumulate on the Model 9G Direct Acting Float Switch, it is of somewhat neutral buoyancy and it adds to the displacement of the float as it adds to its weight. The result is that the float, although sometimes almost unidentifi- able,continues to operate reliably thanks to its size, ruggedness and fixed level of mounting. Typical Installment for Automatic Control of ·ewage Lift Station troublesome for one reason or another. Percentage-wise this is an incredib]y small number. This number ex- cepts a bad batch of floats in April of 1966 which had "bad mercury switches". That problem initiated an im- mediate design change and the floats in question were immediately replaced. It would be unrealistic to think that there haven't been ~operating problems. Consider a few: At Redondo Beach, California some years back, a 9G Float Switch controlled pump station did not operate when the level in the wet pit rose and it was found that a hotel towel had wrapped itself around the bottom '!pump-off" float and had been drawn into the pump suction pipe. The problem stemmed from the fact that the floats were mount- ed entirely too close to the pump suction. Upon changing the float pipe location, reliable per- formance was obtained. In Wisconsin in a wood chip pumping situation, the wood chips "filled in" the process sump and blocked the float movement so the floats could not lower on a lowering liquid level. The sensed media has to be somewhat liquid - even the pumps couldn't handle the chips here except as they kept in motion and in mixture. CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC CO. ~ 6i2 224 947,4 141 South Lafayeile Freeway · St Paul, MN 55107-1420 USA Fax 612/224-3628· Easylink Mod~)ox~ ' 62602690 · rnlernational Telex 757753 2 2. Simplicity of Operation The gG Ploat is about as simple a "mechanism" as can be. Its flexible mounting, direct action {with the output circuit control switch within the float body and directly operated by its ti)ting upon the rise or fall of the sensed level past its mounting elevation) and weight/buoyancy ration combine to make it under- standable by operating personnel and reliable in per- formance. The mercoF~ switch actually opens and closes its cir- cuit on a level change around the horizontal of less than 1". Its total travel from a fully submerged to a hanging-free position of some I2" under typical condi- tions gives more-than-ample movement to assure relia- ble operation. The fixed-pipe-mounting of the 9G seems to be a prob- lem to some people in terms of inconvenience of in- stallation in the first place or readjustment of the operating levels of the pump or alarm control points as it is in service. The need for resetting of con- trol levels is sometimes brought about as a pump sta- tion receives an increasing flow as the area it serves develops. Such resetting can be accomplished quite readily if e- nough slack is left in the float cables and the pipe clamps are sufficiently accessible to allow the entire pipe and float assembly to be lifted out of the wet well and the readjustment made above the wet pit on the ground level. Another more common way to provide convenience of adjustment is to place the floats near the wet well ladder so that the adjustments can be made by merely sliding the type 316 stainless steel float mounting hardware to its desired level with the pipe and floats generally in place. The same fixed-pipe-mounting that looks like a problem to some people is considered a real asset by most users. You know that as the liquid level rises or falls past the mounting elevation of the float clamp, the flea, will perform ~n spite of .sludge, grease blankets, rags or "what have you". A rising blanket of floating debrit or grease will not grasp the float and cause it to rise uneperated - the 9G will break through the blanket and "do its thing". As the level lowers, the weight of the float will again give relia- ble performance and cause it to drop and go to its un- operated position. That sort of fixed mounting reliability of operation is the long-term benefit that is worth some sma)) in- convenience in making the initial and subsequent level settings. The understandability of the 9G Float System, the con- venience of the controller/alternator test switches, the reliable "all-relay" design of the two-pump auto- matic alternator (without ratchets, pawls or rotating parts - doesn't need "phasing out" of pump motor starter wiring) are factors that have won the approval of operating personnel across the country. 3. Quality and Ruggedness The Model 9G Direct Acting Float Switch was primarily designed to do a sometimes-difficult job and do it well - not to meet a price. The sizable type 316 stainless steel float body, the specially-stranded and jacketed AWG No. 14-3 cable with extra Neoprene jacketing in the hinge area, the specially-flared type 316 Clamp tube and type 316 fittings were all si zed and specified with these factors in mind; * resistance to corrosion * weight/buoyancy relationship of the float (to achieve reliable operation in high- solid-content liquids) * ruggedness to withstand on-the-job punishment * practicability of design to allow manufacture The result of the quality:criteria-design is a product that ships out to a variety of jobs and does them without complaint or call-back. It mingles with rail- road ties in some trash sumps, with grease blankets in rendering wastes, wi th chicken feathers, cJnnery, citrus or sanitary wastes, cutting oils, chemicals tnd sometimes refreshing)y-pure water. It does its job reliably day after day and year after year. After seeing the float for the first time and consid- ering its operation, many ask "What is the life ex- pectancy of the cable in the hinging area?" When the gG was being developed, the early clamp tube design was round-flared on each end just enough to e- liminate a sharp edge and the cable had 84 strands per conductor. The float thus consteucted was placed under a life test to determine its flexing life. It was fully-submerged and then hanging freely on a 5.second cycle basis. When a conductor fail ed, the test rig had accumulated operations equaling 35 years of 15 minute cycling. The 15 minute cycling is thought to represent sewage lift station service. That 35 year life figure might seem ~dequate, but two significant things were done to considerably improve the flexing li~e. The cable clamp tube was developed to a bell-shape with a long flare just a little straighter than the natural curvature of the cable. This distributes the cable bending point over some 3/4" of its length. The cable was changed to a specially-constructed as- sembly having 105 strands per conductor (315 strands per cable) to give the best possible flexibility and life. The combination of cable stranding and tube flaring has given such an increase in the flexing life ~hat we are not aware of any failures of the 9G cable in this important hinge area. The mercury switch used in the 9G Float (furnished either as a "normally-open" or "normally-closed" cir- cuit when the float is hanging freely) is of single- pole, single-threw, heavy-duty type with ratings as follows: Resistive; AC: 3D Amps ~ 30 V 20 Amps g 115 V 10 Amps @ 230 V DC: 30 Amps ~ 30 V 12 Amps @ 115 V 6 Amps ~ 230 V Motor Loads; AC: .5 hp ~ 115 V .5 hp @ 230 V DC:.25 hp @ 115 V .25 hp @ 23O V AC Lamp Load; 1,000 watts The switch with its completed electrical cable connec- tions is fully encapsulated in an eopxy potting com- pound in a plastic cartridge. The encapsulation mate- rial is forced back up the cable assembly to seal the cable end and protect the switch against moisture that might follow the cable stranding upon submergence of the top end of the cable. The green-jacketed cable conductor is forced against the inner wall of the float tube thus providing an ef- fective ground connection for the float body. The 5½" diameter float is hell-arc welded of No. 20 Gauge (.035") type 316 stainless halves which have first been drawn, trimmed and prepared to receive the switch assembly with the cable and hinge-area jacket to rende~ the switch connections sealed even upon dam- age to the cable jacket. A 7/8" O.D. SS tube extends fully into the float body and allows the entire switch/float assembly to be permanently assembled and sealed with a dual circular crimp. Attention to design detail and the use of carefully selected and sized materials (without cost-concern as a primary criteria) have given a product that can be relied on to do an outstanding job in difficult and challenging applications. That may not sound exciting but it ii impressive to the knowledgeable people that count on it for its re- liable performance and keep repeating the same buying decision on job after job. 4. Maintainability & Convenience The 9G F]oats do not genere]ly require any maintenance. Convenience features such as float circuit test switches, dim-glow pilot lights, etc., are all stand- ard in the Model 9G system controllers and accesso- ries. The entire system is designed with operator con- venience in mind. The Controller/Alternator utilizes relays that are in stock at numerous Potter & Brumfteld distributors a- cross the country (as well as in good inventory et our plant) for convenience in case any replacement is needed. 3 The Controller/Alternator load relays have barriered, molded nylon, plug-in receptacles rated at 300 VAC and load relays with a 10 Ampere, 250 VAC inductive rating (at .8 PF). The float circuit test switches have pos- itive snap-action and generous rating. The Powerpack panels utilize first-quality circuit breakers, magnetic motor starters,NEMA type enclosures and other components of well-known make which are stocked in our inventory and in many other locations across the country. All wiring is in accord with the National Electric Code and State and local require- ments. Each panel is supplied with internal and con- nection electrical drawings, installation and adjust- ment instructions and parts lists for convenient in- stallation, operating and maintenance. 5. Economy The Model 9G Direct Acting Float Switch bears the (du- bious?) honor of being the most "expensive" float of its general type. We say "general type" because there isn't another device just like it. Some of the advan- tages of the 9G over its nearest imitators have to do with its ruggedness (I've neven heard of one cracking apart or dropping off of its cable), its fixed mount- ing (I've never heard of a 9G rising unoperated with the sensed level on a blanket of anything} and its "complete system" availability (the 9G is available from stock with pipe clan~)s, cable junction boxes, basic pump controllers/alternators of complete pumping station Powerpack panels). In terms of cost of operation, the 9G system is econo- mical (anyway you define the term) as an ON/OFF sewage pump control device in comparison with; sliding jugs in guide pipes or cages (they stick) sliding rod or float-on-rod {they often gum up or corrode) and in terms of long-term cost. The 9G is lower cost by most any "initial" or "long-term" evaluation in comoarison with air-purge bubbler systems with their costly and complex air compressors, tanks, reducing valves, etc. Most diaphragm type level controls suffer from conden- sation accumulation fouling and may appear to be. economical but are costly if replaced often. P~obe controls in sanitary wastes suffer from problems of grease-fouling or if their voltage potential is high enough, they constitute an electrical hazard. Trapped air {compressorless air systems) controls are suscep- tible to leakage problems and sensor unreliability due to corrosion and need for accurate level sensing and timing just above the bottom end of the air pipe to achieve air recharge. No one system will fare best on all comparisons, but the Model 9G Direct Acting Float Switch Control System "does its thing" reliably and very economically in long-term cost. The Model 9G Direct Acting Float Switch Control System is acclaimed by many for its reliability-performance record, its simplicity of direct action float/switch, its quality-ruggedness, its maintainability and con- venience and its econonlv. How does it "stack up" in your experience? We will be glad to hear from you regarding your suc- cessful applications of the 9G, any problems you have had with it or your general opinion about the ~ield of sewage pump control. If you're not now a member of the would love to have you join. MB00226-177 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC Co. 141 South Lafayette Freeway · St Paul, MN 55107-1420 USA 9G Booster Club, we C~ile B1.030 612/224-9474 Fax 612/224-3628 Easylink Mailbox 62602690 · Internabonal Telex 757753 Shhhockless Swing-Check Valve Bulletin AUTOMATIC VALVE SPECIALISTS 1116 RI[DGE AVENUE PITTSBURGH PA..15233,412:321 !SCi!SE) Shhhockless Swing-Check Valves Installation The swing check valve is installed horizon* tally or vertically' in the line on the pump discharge, or elsewhere in the line at stra- tegic points to prevent back flow, with the inlet pressure against check disc No. 3, tending to open the valve. The lever No. 30 on the outside of the valve should be for most installations equipped with a weight which tends to hold the check disc against the seat to keep the valve closed. Operation The inlet pressure against check disc No. 3 opens the valve and raises the weighted lever on the outside of the valve to the "up" position. Simultaneously, the piston of the shhhockless chamber on the outside of the valve is raised to the "up" position drawing air into the shhhockless cylinder through small check valve on the side of the chamber. When there is a reverse flow in the main line the pressure against the back of check disc No, 3 forces it against the seat -- to the closed position. The action is acceler- ated by the weight on the lever on the outside of the valve, Simultaneously, the piston in the shhhockless chamber is forced down. The air in the shhhockless chamber cannot escape through the aux- iliary check valve because it closes with reversal of pressure. Thus the only escape for the air from the shhhockless chamber is out the bottom of the chamber between the shhhockless plug and the adjustable sleeve. The shhhockless plug is tapered thereby permitting a throttling action when it engages the adjustable sleeve on the downward stroke of the piston. At the factory the adjustable sleeve is set so that the shock-prevention does not take place until the main valve is about 90% closed. Thus the main valve will move rapidly to its seat to the fully closed posi- tion for approximately 90% of its stroke, and then be affected by the action of the shhhockless chamber which permits it to be shhhockless through the last 10% of its stroke. VALVE SIZE ~ ~ Adjustment The air shhhockless chamber on the side of the main valve can be adjusted. If you desire the main valve to be shhhockless earlier in its stroke, screw up, clockwise, on adjustable sleeve No. 26. If you desire t~e valve to be shhhockless later in its stroke, or when it is closer to the seat, then screw out, counter*clockwise, on the adjustable sleeve. The weight on the outside lever is adjust- able to have the main valve close quicker on the reverse flow, and can be moved out toward the end of the lever for quicker closing, or moved in toward the shaft for slower response to reverse flow. FLOW IN U.S. GALLONS PER MINUTE THROUGH VALVE NOTE: Valves are available in sizes 24", 30", 36" and 42". Apply to the main office for drawings, dimensions, weights and prices on these larger sized valves. These valves also available with modified design to accelerate closing speed, and some other special functions - apply to main office for engineering help. GENERAL ARRANGEMENT & DIMENTIONS: LIST OF PARTS BODY CKING KEY -RING '~ 1'7~1'8 I ~ 128 1~3 I~, 1 4o 330 445 457 584 711 838 914 106 01( -12 A © .I UOR[ZONTAL OR VER~C~L 'NSTALLA~Ot :---.,,-,- , ,..-,- t01C-~O8 Specifications General list of materials PART MATERIAL ASTM or SAE The swing check valve shall be constructed with heavy cast iron or cast steel body with a bronze or stainless steel seat ring, a non-corrosive shaft for attachment of weight and lever, and complete non- corrosive shhhockiess chamber. It shall absolutely prevent the return of water, oil or gas back through the valve when the inlet pressure decreases below the delivery pressure. The valve must be tight seating, and must be shhhockless in operation. The seat ring must be renew- able and shall be securely held in place by a threaded joint. The shhhockless chamber shall be attached to the side of the valve body externally and so constructed with a piston opera- ting in a chamber that will effectively per- mit the valve to be operated without any hammering action. The shock absorption shall be by air, and the shhhockless cham- ber shall be so arranged that the closing speed will be adjustable to meet the serv- ice requirements. The valve disc shall be of cast iron or cast steel and shall be suspended from a non- corrosive shaft which will pass through a stuffing box and be connected to the shhhockless chamber on the outside of the valve. All material and workmanship shall be first class throughout and the purchaser reserves the right to inspect this valve be- fore shipment. Any failure of this valve to operate satisfactorily during the first year of installation due to faulty workmanship or defective material will be the responsi- bility of the manufacturer who will be held liable for replacement or correction. THE VALVE WILL BE THE GA INDUS- TRIES, INC. FIG. NO. 250-D (for 125# Os ASA Std.) FIG. No. 250-U (for 250~ ASA td.), Pittsburgh, Pa. Body, Cover, Disc, Levers Cast Iron (semi-steel) or A 126 Cl. B. Disc Arm Cast Steel A 216 Cl. WCB Seat Bronze or B 62 Stainless Steel A-157-C 9 Seat Ring Rubber or Metal to Suit 80 Dur. Yoke Gasket Composition or Garlock 660, Composition 7021 or equal Hinge Shaft Stainless Steel Type 303 Studs, Bolts, Nuts Steel Commercial Shhhockless Chamber Bronze B 62 Stuffing Box Packing Composition Garlock 234 or equal The above references cover the general list shall conform to the most recently pub- of materials for swing check valves. They lished standards. are subject to change to make them con- form to the specific requirements of the All valves designed and manufactured by particular job for which they are required, the company are guaranteed for satisfac- The material specifications shown above tory and durable service. SPECIAL: This valve can be specially lined with rubber, saran, or other similar materials for specific applications such as paper mills, chemical plants, etc. Contact the home office for availability and price. WARRANTY The Shhhockless Swing Check Valve is made of the finest available suitable materials and precaubon has been taken to assure premium quality workmanship consistent with established quahty control Valves or parts which are proved faulty due to defective material or workmanship will be replaced free of charge FOB our plant upon written presentauon of such proo[ This warranty sha~l not cover cost of installation or any charges related thereto, and it is valid for a period of one year from date of shipment More GA Shhh0ckless Valves: Altitude Valves Water Pressure Relief Valves Solenoid Valves Water Pressure Float Valves Reducing Valves Hydraulic Check Strainers Valves Electric Check Valves Complete Line Waste Water Valves H-777aM Product Guide 3 Magnetic-inductive Flowmeters MAGmeter made by KROHNE measure the flow of liquids, pastes and slurries. They operate without moving parts in the fluid and without constriction in the tubes. Therefore they operate without additionel pressure loss and maintenance free. Altoflux Magnetic-Inductive Flowmeters MAGmeter series Altoflux MT 900, Description The KROHNE MAG series MT 900 are using a keyed constant magnetic field. As described on page 10, the magnetic field in these types of MAG's is gener- ated by a direct current given to the coils in the prima~y head. This currant is produced in the converter. The fre- quency in which this constant current is keyed, is 15 Hz, when the power line has 60 Hz (or 12.5 Hz of 50 Hz). The series MT 900 consists of the primary head M 930 through M 960 and the converter T 900. The primary head is mounted into the pipeline as an adapter piece. The electronic converter T 900 is mounted separately. The connection between the two is done with KROHNE provided, special cable. The MAGmeter series MT 900 has the highest accuracy of all Magnetic-Inductive Flowmeters. Under standard conditions the maximum error is below 0.5% of actual flow between 50 and 100% of maximum flow. Guaranteed! Primary heads are manufactured in nominal diameters from 5/64" to 24". (Sizes up to 120" see page 22). The primary head consists mainly of a non-magnetic pipe with an insulating liner; two magnetic ceils mounted on the outside and the electrodes in constant contact with the fluid. The liners can be: hard rubber, so[t rub- bar, neoprene, polyurethane, PTFE, glass or ceramic The coils mounted on to the measuring pipe and the cabling in the series M 940, 950 and 960 are completely isolated from the outside by completely welded housings M 930 has a silicon rubber jacketed housing. Since there are no electronic components in the primary flow heads and since the sealing of the electrodes has been achieved to this perfect degree, one finally could con- vert to th~s ideal design, in which the housing is completely welded, A small connection box mounted on top of the housing with rugged terminals easily allows the connection of the cable to the converter, The cable used bet ween primary head and converter is spe- cially shielded. The measured signal applied to the electrodes also a square wave voltage, directly proportional to the flow, is amplified in the conveder T 900 and converted to an analog standard signal 0... 20 or 4... 20 mA. Parallel to the analog output a frequency output is available, the frequency of which is directly proportional to the velocity of flow. Internally the converter T 900 consists of 2 sections. The first section "field current supply" supplies a precisely controlled square wave current of ± 0.125 A maxi- mal 60 V to the primary head field coils The other section "signal processing" converts the flow proportional signal voltage from the primary head electrodes which is in phase with the field current and produces a flow-proportional out- put signal0or4 . 20 mA For the block li~nr~m T 900 please see the installation Advantages of the MAG series Altoflux MT 900 condensed 1. The measurement is always underta- ken under stabilized current condition, and hence also with a stationary magnetic field. This means insensitivity to the electric interference of your power supply and voltages of all phase relationship. Similarly there is no zero- point-drifting due to inhomogenities of conductivity or electrode contami- nation. 2. The fully welded sealed steel housing guarantees absolute tightness and optimal shielding against interlering fields. E~xf~,~(J t~,~'.-' ;l~e ( 3 In the primary head there are no elec- tronic components. This makes them highly reliable, especially when used at extremely high temperatures and when ambient conditions are adverse. 4 The MAG series MT 900 has a very Iow power consumption of only 20 VA for the total system (primary head plus converter; independent of nominal bore size) 5. The MAG series MT 900 is available in Ex-proof-version (except M 930). German PTB approval) Special features of the converter T 900: 1. Digital range setting by frequency division. Therefore no sensitivity error due to non-linearity of the measuring range 2. 15 Hz field frequency, consequently improved dynamic characteristics and improved suppression of statistic inter- ference voltages. 3. Galvanic separation of the signal out- puts is standard. Consequently prob leto free connection with the single side grounded recording equipment and systems (Data loggers). 4. Frequency output standard 1 kHz/ft/s flow velocity independent of the measuring range setting or 1 kHz for the measuring range full scale. Active pulse output. Pulse height 2 - 10 V, minimum 2 kOhm, pulse width 15 ps. Suitable for direct connection to an electronic counter 5. Full interchangeability of component boards with retention of the accuracy of measurement. 6. Zero-point-setting and checking without external instruments 7' All signal outputs and field current supply of the converter T 900 are unlimited secured against shorting and open-circuit. M 95O for sizes 1%"...12" M960 for sizes 14"...24' M 950 Meter Weight size a b c d e *f j lbs 2 V2' 33 38 4" 62 77 Scraper type U S.-cleaning electrode only with DN 1V~" - 12" Scraper type U.S.-cleaning electrode Removable electrode only with DN 1 V2' - 12" 2~ Minimum necessary room M 950 M 960 Removable electrode * Minimum necessary room M960 Meter Weight size a b c d e f lbs 14" 19HA~'' 28 V~'! 22~,,~'' 12~5/1~'' 13V~' 57~/~'' 419 16" 23%" 305/~'' 25' 13 ~/~ ~" 13a//' 59 '/~" 463 18- 23%" 32 V=" 27' 14 ~'~c'' 14 V~" 61 V/' 485 20" 23%" 34,/~" 28'/;" 151~¢,~'' 14%'" 63 V2" 529 22" 23%" 36 ~/2" 30 V2" 16~4/~'' 15V/' 65 V=" 551 MAGmeter series Altoflux MT 900, Description The KROHNE MAG series MT 900 are using a keyed constant magnetic field. As described on page 10, the magnetic field in these types of MAC's is gener- ated by a direct current given to the coils in the primary head. This current is produced in the converter. The fre- quency in which this constant current is keyed, is 15 Hz. when the power line has 60 Hz (or 12.5 Hz of 50 Hz). The serie~ M f 900 consists of the primary head M 930 through M 960 and the converter T 900. The primary head is mounted into the pipeline as an adapter piece. The electronic converter T 900 is mounted separately. The connection between the two is done with KROHNE provided. special cable, The MAGmeter series MT 900 has the highest accuracy of all Magnetic-Inductive Flowmetem Under standard conditions the maximum error is below 0.5% of actual flow between 50 and t00% of maximum flow. Guaranteed! Primary heads are manufactured in nominal diameters from 5/r~" to 24'. (Sizes up to 120" see page 22). . The primary head consists mainly of a non-magnetic pipe with an insulating liner; two magnetic coils mounted on the outside and the electrodes in constant contact with the fluid, The liners can be: hard rubber, soft rub- bar, neoprene, polyurethane, PTFE, glass or ceramic. The coils mounted on to the measuring pipe and the cabling in the series M 940, ,950 and 960 are completely isolated from the outside by completely welded housings. M 930 has a silicon rubber lacketed housing. Since there are no electronic components in the primary flow heads and since the seating of the electrodes has been achieved to this perfect degree, one finally could con- vert to this ideal design, in which the housing is completely welded. A small connection box mounted on top of the housing with rugged terminals easily allows the connection of the cable to the converter. The cable used bet- ween primary head and converter is spe- cially shielded. The measured signal applied to the electrodes also a square wave voltage, directly proportional to the flow, is amplified in the converter T 900 and converted to an analog standard signal 0... 20 or 4... 20 mA. Parallel to the analog output a frequency output is available, the frequency of which is directly proportional to the velocity of flow. Internally the converter T 900 consists of 2 sections. The first section "field current supply" supplies a precisely controlled square wave current of ± 0.125 A maxi- mai 60 V to the primary head field coils. The other section "signal processing" converts thc flow proportional signal voltage from the primary head electrodes which is in phase with the field current and produces a flow-proportional out- put signal 0 or 4 . 20 mA. For the block Advantnges of the MAG series Altoflux MT 900 condensed 1, The measurement is always underta- ken under stabilized current condition, and hence also with a stationary magnetic field. This means insensitivity to the electric interference of your power supply and voltages of a!l phase relalionship. Similarly there is no zero- point-drifting doe to inhomogenities of conductivity or electrode contami- nation. 2 The fully welded sealed steel housing guarantees absolute tightness and optimal shielding against interlering fields. ~¢~'~'~,~(~/ 0.,"'~..' ~!-~. (" 3. In the ~rima,w head there are no elec- tronic components. This makes them highly reliable, especially when used at extremely high temperatures and when ambient conditions are adverse. 4. The MAG series MT 900 has a very Iow lption of only 20 VA for the total syslem (primary head plus converter; independent of nominal bore size). 5. The MAG series MI' 900 is available in Ex-Proof-version (except M 930) (German PTB approval.) Special features of the converter T 900: 1. Digital range setting by frequency division. Therefore no sensitivity error due to noo-linearity of the measuring range 2. !5 Hz field frequency, consequently Improved dynamic characteristics and improved suppression of slatistic inter- ference voltages. 3. Galvanic separation of the signal out- puts is standard. Consequently prob leto free connection with the single side grounded recording equipment and systems (Data loggers) 4. Frequency output standard 1 kHz/ft/s flow velocity independent of the measuring range setting or 1 kHz for the measuring range full scale. Active pulse output. Pulse height 2 - 10 V. minimum 2 kOhm. pulse width 15 ps. Suitable for direct connection to an electronic counter 5. Full interchangeability of component boards with retention of the accuracy of measurement. 6 Zero-point-setting and checking without external instruments 7. All signal outputs and field current supply of the converter T 900 are unlimited secured against shorting and open-circuit, COMBINATION SEWAGE AIR VALVES IREGULARLY FURNISHED FOR1 SERVICE UP TO 150 PSI- HIGHER PRESSURES AVAILABLE*SPECIFY IF OPERATING PRESSURE BFLOW 20 PSt. C 106 l e 3'-2 ~ SACK FLUSHING ATTACHMENTS C.I. MANHOLE 2,* 11 1/~ COVER & FRAME "f~t ~ ~ '~"~/~-'t~L TOTAL WT. 280 |0~" RD.. BACK FLUSHING HOSE (2)-3~" DIA, x 2'0" LONG ~RECAST CONCRETE PIPE SECTION 2" MINIMUM CLEARANCE CRUSHE STD. SPEC, SIZE NO. 7 COMPACTED FILL THREADED TO SUIT INLET RD DL~.~ T on INCREASE ITS SERVIC E~elL~l~__Y ARCE~ SIZE INCHES OVERALL HEIGHT IN. WEIGH1 MODEL WT. INLET OUTLET A B C PLAIN WITH ATTCHMTS 401/400 2 NPT 1 NPT 24 25% 33~ 100 130 ~0~40o ~NPT ~NPT? ~2~Z ~'~ ~'t~, 175 403i4~ 3 NPT 3 NPT 28 27% 34 175 220 ~0414~ 4 FLG~ ~ ~ N~ ;~'~ ~ :~ 270 40~4~ GFLG. 6PLAIN 29 33 44 280 35~ 410/4~ 10FLG, IOPLAIN 35 42'%, 51 700 875 414/400 14FLG. 14PLAIN 44 53% 63% 1,100 1,375 4011400--402/400--4031400--4041400 NOT NORMALLY SUPPLIED WITH HOOD These valves combine the large venting capacily of the air and vacuum valve with the ability of the air release valve to venl small pockets of air which collec~ under pressure.'Tbe combination when ordered shippFd completely assembled as shown with accessories. FOR IN PLANT USE SPECIFY AIR AND VACUUM VALVE WITH THREADED OR FLANGED OUTLET While the sewage is standing in the valve body sediment will al- Iempl ~o settle oul al the bottom. This sediment may be blown off by closing ~he 2' Shut Off Valve and nexl opening the I ' Blow Off Valve. The compressed air and gas in the upper part of the valve body will blow the sediment oul of Ihe I. Blow Off Valve. A rubber hose wilh quick disconnect c6uplings is furnished for back flushing the valve. Two quick disconnect couplings are furnished on the valve cover lo which the hose may be rapidly connected and disconnected for flushing using an approved waler supply. The center quick disconnect coupling permits flushing of the venting orifice and mechanism while the o~her wilh the ~" Silul Off Valve permits flushing the valve body when the Y~" Shut Off Valve is Opened. SIZING ~USE APeD SLIDE RULE AIR VALVE COMPUTER FOR ACCURATE SIZE SELECTION NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DiSTRiCT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING EXHIBIT SEWER SYSTEM PLAN - S.C. DISTRICT NO. 48 (VILLA(gE OF GREENPORT) NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING EXHIISIT h PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL PLANS NAYLOR ENGINEERING SEWER DISTRICT CONNECTION JOB NO. 253-01 PECONIC LANDING E~HIBIT i CONNECTION AUTHOF, IZATION LETTEF. FE. OM VILLAGE December 17, 1992 c/o ~racken and Mar~olin, ~sqs. One ~uffolk Square Z&iandi&, ~e~ Xock ~1722 RE: LETTERS O~ AVAILk3!LIT¥ "~REA~R$ AT ISLANDS END" set~lement ~!aced Upon the recor~ on November 2, 1992, to be Supreme court, ~he ¥iliage of Greenport does hereby adviaa ~ha~ ~c ~hal~ makm av&ila~le for your project water and aFproved site plan knou as the "~reakers a= I=land~ End," Gceenpor:, To~n of ~ouChold, Neu York. Very truly yours, VILLAGE OF G~EE~PORT William R. Pall, III WRP:lm= NAYLOR ENGIHEERING ~t W ~ D]S1EIC'i ,~0NNE£.ll .,N JOB NO. 253-01 Et.~ N,~, LAND'ING EXHIBIT J PUBLIC WATER AVAILABILITY LETTER FROM SC'WA SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Donald Slotnick Director of Distribution 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, Long Island, New York 11769 Area Code (516) 589-5200 April 29, 1998 Mr. Joseph H. Baler, P.E. Acting Director of Environmental Health Services Suffolk County Department of Health County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 Dear Mr. Baler: The proposed installation of eight (8) inch main in Easement Areas "A", "B", "C" and "D", and six (6) inch main in Easement Areas "B", "E", "F", "G", "H", "1", "J", "K", "L" and "M", as shown on Map of Life Care Community Peconic Landing at Southold, located in the Town of Southold, as prepared by Young & Young and dated September 17, 1997, is adequate to supply water for domestic and fire protection purposes. The Authority will undertake the installation of this water main under the terms of its standard Construction Contract, but such agreement has not yet been executed by the Authority and the developer. The time required for the completion of the proposed work is necessarily determined by the Authority's ability to obtain delivery of the required materials, easements for maintaining the mains in the streets that are private, weather conditions, and the existence of adequate supply works at the time the work is done. This letter of availability is not to be considered an Action by the Suffolk County Water Authority as defined by SEQRA regulations, and this response does not commit Suffolk County Water Authority to commence, engage or otherwise participate or approve an action where SEQRA is applicable until all aspects of the SEQRA process are complete and the Lead Agency has made a final determination and finding as related to the project. Very truly yours, Donald Siotnick, P.E. ~ Director of Distribution / c.c. E. Rosavitch L. Anderson P. Ponturo