Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-96.-1-19.1
............_ . t .y 1 y_. '.•';, r ••_.1 .2z:';, �_..1:'+ d�_ y.i_�^;: �b><.d.�t�,l.,„� ,q{•1�1'b^b 1. �y , .Nt S,d'%' 3- ��_� e . - .�;N �u ,jS �<fi`' , .:�Y., :'17...' _ —_ _ — _ .'7 .f •^_°icy' , t., R;. ,r`,.;u - A. k`. rl Y A,.n_ mi' .lr.. '.fi,.H. .�,,"F 1. r.$.ID $i. _ __ _— _`,n. "m` ,.Via= 1 .{6 - �?' ++^'�' _j ;�<ar �i• 4.. � :4;(, �.. .;� — — _ :1` ;�u. .M;r,,, .;�` 'YYtt�` .tt t•. i,. F, ,�.- .,r .� sd'I, .tW.. ev_` >vy-' ie •.�: ,�- � s� [ ,S .��' '�''_° d� r�7:v°< �'•.'k^-�•�r t t>; ��°i ��-..t.,.s..'�` t`,. rra.•°z'�r• zs. 'u-g�, /„ r .r..re� — -- ';a.�.'a�'' a4 �'i:r�taw�a '•a;��''� d,..� �..Y`�,.�;t_..tar&:� t. ,:�.nu2;ri,6'ed��nl.: � rn�;�"�: tesLGar;�... r' •., '�,.• r,�+`Y,:n,� � ..,.��•.".�.''.�'..f- � _- —__ --_ EXISTING MONOPOLE /TO REMAIN V.I.F. EXISTING FENCED COMPOUND 1) AREA OF SITE 1,OSACRES or 45,589SQ. FT. / 2) AREA OF BUILDING(S) EXIST. BLDNG.-4,772 SQ. FT. k PROPOSED ENCLOSURE FOR PROP, BLDNG,-261 SQ. FT, P NEXTEL EQUIPMENT. 3) PERCENT OF LOT OCCUPANCY 1 1% W I L L I A M F. C 0 L L I N S, A I A A R C H I T E C T S, LLP PROPOSED `NEXTEL - `O� 4) AREA OF PAVING ) _s. ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO G AREA OF WORK. SEE 2/A-2 14 740,4 SQ. FT, ( 32% - EXISTING MONOPOLE s> �' � �� ENLARGED PLAN FOR MORE .y.'. ° t ar•iwr.- \� INFORMATION. 5) AREA AND PERCENT OF NATURAL VEGETATION TO RE'�IAIN PERMANENTLY 52.5% & 23,899.84 SQ. FT, 6) AREA AND PERCENT OF SITE AREA REVEGETATED BACK TO NATURAL N/A 10-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, NY 11733 EXISTING TREE LINE (TYP.) 631-689-9450 \ 7) AREA AND PERCENT OF TURF AND LANDSCAPING 19% & 8530.5 SQ. FT, VOICE p ;, W w . W f�C!l 1 a .�G_0 nl �Zr, ,.::.'�•-•,�,;:`•. � \ 8) AREA AND PERCENT OF NON-FERTILIZER DEPENDENT VEGETATION 33,5% & 15369.34 SQ. FT. REPUTED OWNER 9) PARKING REQUIRED N/A "ARKING PROVIDED N/A *. G 2 e�/fO4iy�'pY .9 s '9 S, JOSEPH SCHOENSTEIN 10) LANDBANKED STALLS N/A C' O o COS h' tic .rys�� ' 305 LEEWARD DR1VE 971 1 1) LOADING REQUIRED N/A LOADING PROVIDED N/A .,.,, .,.x '• k 's>� \ /, 12) DATUM U.S.C. & G.S. OR T.O.S. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD � C 3q,\./ 13) INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY INDUSTRIAL/COMMUNICATION ?s o C1O 14) DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER CONSULTANT h / \ S8 �s 15) ZONING L.I.DiST LIGHT INDUSTRY 16) SUFFOLK CO. TAX NUMBER(S) K 1 T 1 10 ads? r REPUTED OWNER v TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 53095 MAIN ROAD } � {, rt. 9 LIPA PP 423 _.d.. %:`.stf> :..'�•' wu� it 4•,�`, r" �I .:� . m: , .a,SOUTHOLD NY 119 71 rasn $q ��' �'�;>' t.a'F 'a� ��.�9w.a,_.�Cnt.�'a"a:9L '�rd�EaE.,�C� ''���:: M s� BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT s>o � NO. DATE REVISION I � LANDSCAPED ' � 1) CONCRETE CURB N/A O AREA .�9, � ,• •0 0 1, 06/22/01 REVISED FOR COORDINATION 2) ASPHALT CURB N/A Cl` -10 .� 3) GRAVEL WALKS 60 SQ,FT, 2. 08/22/01 REVISED AS PER NEXTEL ' O 4) PAVING N/A 5) CATCH BASIN N/A � J�'?� sgs •// hh PROPERTY LINE 6) STORM DRAINS N/A "' / • ss.O / 7) STOCKADE FENCE N/A ' 01' 8) CHAIN LINK FENCE t 8'-010 DATE ISSUED TO DATE ISSU TO r • ss,� '0,, s`ssIr / ISSUED TO ) SCREEN 9 PI ANTING N/A 05/22/01 FOR FILN`'� °'e / 10) SHRUBS - N/A 08/22/01 FOR FL,. O� s BITUMINOUS as J� s /Br -- - ---- 11) SEEDED/LAWN AREA N/A R ems'° REPUTED OWNER ^�h' '�(iT�Tq< STO °J 9e PAVEMENT s` ,/ °ss,� 12) RECHARGE BASIN EXCAVATION N/A _ ARTHUR JUNGE 13) RECHARGE 'ASIN FENCING N/A P.O.BOX 299 s ORIENT NEW YORK 11957 �� Sh'O�o Q°`� s�,® ss>6 ° � 14) RECHARGE BASIN PLANTING N/A KEY PL" (70 / a 6:g Ap �0� s ss90 \ s,eIt ZONING DISTRICT: 1000 LONGITUDE: W72. 47' 14,4" ss �H � \� ��o� SECTION: 096 LATITUDE: N40 i 52' 34.8" BLOCK: 01 p LOT: 19.1 Gs EXISTING TREE ,o \\ u� u ,.! £•�^7, ,� /�O ��� /�, LOCATION OF 9M LINE (TYP.) \ ?� ' cz e� /ry K/ NOTE' „ EXISTING EXISTING DUE TO THE INDUSTRIAL AESTHETIC NATURE OF THE EXISTING DRYWELL r 2526 \ s' z� / V' SITE, FENCING TO MATCH EXISTING WILL BE PROViJED AT THE PROPOSED EXTENSION TO THE COMPOUND. NO ADDITIONAL EXISTING PROPANE TANKS LANDSCAPING WILL BE PROVIDED. \ / �." \ , REPUTED OWNER COMMUNICATIONS EXISTING METER CENTER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD REPUTED OWNER �/ 53095 MAIN ROAD NOTE: , APPRO! 'Ep BY PECONIC NORTH JENNIE HARRIS ESTATE \\ / SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON FIELD SURVEY EXISTING TRANSFORMER \ PREPARED BY 'BARRET, BONACCI & VAN WEELE, P,C.' CIVIL P�.�1 !�' �s"� BOARD 305 LEEWARD DRIVE �\ as, ENGINEER/SURVEYORS/PLANNERS, 175A COMMERC'.: T��� DR. N T -2812 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 \o HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788, PHONE: (631) 435-1111 "/''3 �r_ �s��OI.D CONCRETE (CURB FAX (631) 435-1022 ( AUGUST 4, 2001, PROJECT # A010670) DATE AUG COUNTY ROAD 48 LIPA PP#4210 _ a CUTCHOGUE, NY TITL.EI SITE PLAN DATEI MOJFC r NO.: 5/22/01 01-3976 6 SCALE: DRAWING NO." AS NOTED DRAWN Br- NORTH Ls./w.K. CHECKED BYI PKG sp � 0 10 20 0 0C f v ,�,�� �� ...�:�^�' SHEET NO.' 10F2 SITE PLAN . �. 1 1„_20'-0„ i - - -- -- SCALE:1 "=20'-O" - W r 105'-8"± AGL �164'-8"± AMSL T.O. EXISTING MONOP'OLE EXISTING SECTOR ANTENNAS, - - � TO REMAIN Ip IT WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, L L P, 102'-6"± AGL p — - 2 1111 -- --- OF EXISTING ANTENNAS EXISTING 105'-8" HIGH MONOPOLE 10-1 TEclflvoLoGY DRIVE SET'AUKET, NY 11733 TO REMAIN V•I,F. EX I STII NG EQUIPMENT VOICE 631-689--8450 FAX 631-689-8459 ENCLOSURE TO REMAIN COX LANE (BEYOND) h t t p W W W W f C a l a . C 0 IIl PROPOSED NEXTEL SECTOR ANTENNAS FASTENED TO T—ARM NEW 4 CRUSHED STONE BEDDING MOUNTING FRAME OVER MiRASCCAPE FILTER FABRIC \ II WITH WOOD BORDER (SEE DETAIL EXISTING 6 -0 HIGH FENCE WITH 5/A-2). 12'-0" WIDE DOUBLE GATE TO REMAIN, 80'-0" AGLti ~ 139'-O"± AMSL OF PROPOSED ANTENNAS CONSiJLTANr 43'-6" Ilk EXISTING GENERATOR TO REMAIN EXISTING CRUSHED STONE X. X SURFACING X EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER PROPOSED GPS-2 PORTION OF EXISTING FENCE TO TO REMAIN. BE REMOVED. Q PROPOSED ELECTRICAL METER & Z NO. DATE REVISION DISCONNECT SWITCH MOUNTED O 1. 06/22/01 REVISED FOR COORDINATION PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES TO DIRECT TO EQUIPMENT W 2, 08/22/01 REVISED AS PER NEXTEL BE ROUTED TO MONOPOLE ENCLOSURE. WITHIN PROPOSED ELEVATED CABLE SUPPORT, - -� PROPOSED POURED CONCRETE m PROPOSED NEXTEL SECTOR LANDING. 00 ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO PROPOSED 10'-0" 11'-6 20'-8" d. QUAD--BRACKET STANDOFF T-ARMS iv X X - •X •— PROPOSED FENCE WITH 4'-0" PROPOSED GPS-1 MOUNTING FRAME BY 'VALMONT WIDE GATE TO MATCH EXISTING. W MICRODFLECT' OR EQUAL. MOUNTING X ' ' FRAME, BRACKETS, AND HARDWARE r • I D , , O DATE ISSUFTI TO DATE ISSUED TO TO BE CONFIRMED BY NEXTEL RF r- PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE ENGINEER AND MONOPOLE x cr_ LOCKABLE GATE TO MATCH MANUIFACTURER. (TYP• FOR 12) AT PROPOSED NOMINAL 12'X20' 05/22/01 FOR FILav% EXISTING. I I 08/22/01 FOR FILING 80 —© LcvEL TO � EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE FOR NEXTEL — -- EQUIPMENT, z FOUNDATION OF EXISTING MONOIPOLE (V.I•F.) N (4) 6"0 PROPOSED BOLLARDS, O PROPOSED 12 X 20 EQUIPMENT U • ENCLOSURE NEXTEL EQUIPMENT EXISTING 105'-8" HIGH � _ _ _ JIEMONOPOLE TO REMAIN (V.I•F.). _ KEY per: 11 '-2" AGL 70'-2"± AMSL X PROPOSED BMR -14PT.O. PROPOSED PROPOSED BMR 19'-6" 20-8" ENCLOSURE PROPOSED BOLLARD J� a EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE PROPOSED ELEVATED CABLE SUPPOORT• o°P PROPOSED GPS-1 ,`\ .••• . 6 -0 AGL 65'--O"± AMSL T.O. PROPOSED FENCE IACAITON OF SITE 0'-0" 59'-0"± AMSL - - - - - - - - - - GRADE : EXISTING FENCE PROPOSED PART OF FENCE TO MATCH EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS NOTE: PECONIC NORTH SEE SITE PLAN, SP-1, FOR ANTENNA SECTOR HEADINGS. NY_2812 NOTE: THE REFERENCED AMSL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON HAS BEEN OBTAINED UTILIZING 3-D TOPOQUADS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING SOFTWARE BY "DELORME". ACTUAL ELEVATIONS MAY VARY ACCORDING TO POINT'S OF. REFERENCE COUNTY ROAD 48 CUTCHOGUE, NY NOTE: TrnLD PROPOSED ANTENNA MOUNT ASSEMBLY TO BE ERECTED ON EXISTING MONOPOLE. DESIGN OF MOUNT ASSEMBLY AND EVALUATION OF EXISTING MONOPOLE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE ELEVATION BY OTHERS. DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS WORK SHALL BE FILED SEPARATELY AND CONCURRENTLY WITH THESE DOCUMENTS. AND ENLARGED PLAN DATE PROJECT NO.: 5/22/01 01-3976 SCALE DRAWING NO: AS NOTED DRAWN BD L.S./W,K, CE ECI(m BY. 0' 4' 8' 16' ENLARGED PLAN 0' 4' 8' 16' NORTH PKG SP�2 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 S� No: 1 8"=1'-0" SCALE:1/8"-1 '-0" 1/8„_1'-0" 20F2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ��S11FF0(,�co BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ��� G,f, P.O.Box 1179 Chairman c Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y = Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO W Telephone(631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS ��i Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR,JR. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . August 13, 2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 12, 2002. The final public hearing was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Nextel Communications is the lease holder and Arthur Junge is the owner of the property known and designated as Nextel Antenna Site, located on the north side of CR 48 in Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, this site plan for Nextel Communications is to affix a wireless telecommunications antenna to an existing monopole and install a related equipment shelter; and WHEREAS, this site plan was certified by the Building Department on August 12, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Town Engineer has reviewed the drainage calculations and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this action is a Type II Action and not subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617; and Nextel Communications — Page Two—8/13/02 WHEREAS, a variance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 25, 2002 to allow the placement of an equipment building at less than the required 70 feet from the rear property line; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said application at Town Hall, Southold, New York on August 12, 2002; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the surveys, dated May 22, 2001 and last revised August 22, 2001, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to a one year review from the date of the building permit. Enclosed please find two copies of the approved site plan; one for your records and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your building permit. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, 1 Bennett r owski, Chairman " encl. cc: Building Dept., Tax Assessors �oSUFFO(,�c MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS h�� OGy P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE G Southold,NY 11971 Chair y OFFICE LOCATION: RICHARD CAGGIANO • Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J.CREMERS y�JJ�l ���� 54375 State Route 25 KENNETH L.EDWARDS (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR Southold,NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE January 11, 2005 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. George Obsuth Construction Project Manager Nextel Communications Two Industrial Avenue Fairfield, NJ 07004 Re: Site Inspection of Nextel Communications County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY SCTM# 1000-96.-1-19.1 Dear Mr. Obsuth, This is to i�orm you that our staff on performed a site inspection January 7, 2005 of the p p �'Y site plan approved on August 12, 2002. In reference to the above, this is to inform you that the site plan requirements have been satisfied. 1 This letter does not condone any changes from the approved site plan and approvals from other agencies if required. If there are any questions you can contact Bruno Semon at(631) 765-1938 x5019 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. I I Respectfully yours, i Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Southold Town Planning Chair CC:file Building Department 1 \ SITE PLAN Presubrl�ission conference (within 30 days of written request)Colllplete a � ) pplication received rnontfis of presub, conference) pflcat►on reviewed at work session �� f� � u;o� I Inro. 01C n (wltlllll 10 clays of receipt) • 1` ) �_ Inro. 0. Applicant advised of necessary revisions (within 30 clays or review) Revised submission received hm` or, \ IfA'L Inro. OK IV'�cadellcy Coordination SEQRA determination o REFERRED TO: -0 9 27,4/7 Ar4 S- -6 9� z Zoning Board of AppealsCv,wirit Z4 ' N (written comments within 60 day,,; y. of request) Board of Trustees _ OC..) Inro OK i Building Department bf u, (certification) o w Suffoll; CountY De oK Department of Planning 'mT zDepartment of Tra rnro. OK c&12 nsportation -State `�o I ro� OK o Department of Transportation - County PZ511 OK F r� Suffolk County Dept. of health � V, FirtTj e Com /fA'l h nlissio pers Inro. OK Se � nt: �ECEI VEp: /�K L� f� ��/��� Received. Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions Iro.` oK t/ Landscape plan n _ I c/ Lighting plan ►roJ. OK ' Curb Cut 4)provaj t_m OK Ilca�[lli � u.ot f�nr•c�v,ll Inro. OK )f llnEll e [Mill l� 1�Cviewcld 1)y.I;n >!n 'e Inro. 0, Approval or site '«'itll c (Matt conditions I:nciorsenlent or J st(e'(�lan Certificate of Occu r panty inspection Year revje v .f I ,.,.,. .PLANNING BOARD MIEMBERa= RICHARD G.WARD ��� CQG Town Hall,53095 Main Road Chairman ti� y� P.O.Box 1179 o= Southold,.New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y . 2 Fax(516)765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. y WILLIAM J.CREMERS O Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS yijJQl Date Received Date Completed Flling Fee PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN New Change of Use Re-use Extension XRevision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: Cutchogue Auto Precision Location: North side of County Road 48, west of Cox Lane Address: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a Name of Applicant: Nextel Communications Address of Applicant: One South Street, Garden City, New York 11530 Telephone: 516-229-6836 Owner of Land: Arthur V Junge Agent or Person responsible for application: Lawrence C. Re, MUNLEY, MEADE NIELSEN & RE' Attorneys for pp scan Address: 36 North New York Avenue, Huntington, New York 11743 Telephone: 631-425-4100 Site plans prepared by: William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLP License No.: 015094 Address: 10-1 Technology Drive, Setauket, New York 11733 Telephone: 631-689-8450 I �t Page 2 Planning Board Site Plan Application APPUCANTS AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SNlMM NASSAU JOHN WALDEN being duly sworn, deposes'and says that he resides at c/o One South Street, Garden City, New York 11530 In the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above(property, or that he Is the Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a Construction Specialist/ of W(K Nextel Communications (Title)Pro ject Manager (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which Is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the'land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and.Is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Signed Sworn to me this _u .-. (Owned/ day of 2001. Nextel of NeY 4, d/b/a Nextel Communications Signed (Part r or Corporate Officer and Title) JOHN WALDEN Notary Publi Construction Specialist/Project Manager j Sworn to me this _day of� CAROLAAIN R. CAJUSTE Notary Public, State of New YO* �1 No. 01 C`5C58769 Cualified in Nassau County (Notary Public) Commission Expires April 15, 2002 PETER M. CASSERLY Notary Public,State of New York No. 01 CA4690126 Qualified In Suffolk County Commission Expires June 30, 20 _ Page 3 . Planning Board Site Plan Application 45, 589 Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) L I Zoning District Existing Use of Site Cutchogue Auto Preci s i on and Publ i c Uti 1 i t.y Wi re l ess Tel ecamnunications Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building Facility will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to existing monopole and install related equipment shelter. Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) 240 Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) N/A Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) N/A Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by X Board of Appeals - Case # & date Board of Trustees = Case # & date NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date Suffolk County Department Health Services- Case # & date 4p5g,406_ -Case Number NYNEX Name of Applicant 11121 jQ1 Date of Decision Expiration Date Other No Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit Issued. NO ACTION(EXCAVAT/ON OR CONSTRUCTION)MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. APPI.ICANT' TRANSACTIONAL i):ISCi.OSURii FORK The Town of Soutliold ' s Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees . -The purpose of this form is to provide informaLion which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is. necessaiy to avoid same . .YO0H NA1,19: Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a N.extel Communications Last• name , first• name + in Belle initial , unless you are applying in' t•he name of someone else or other enLiLy, such as a company . . If so,. indicate 'the other person ' s or company ',s name . ) NATURE OF APPLICATION: . (Clieck all Lha l apply . ) Tax grievance Variance Change of, zone Approval of plat Exemption from plaL. or official map 0L lie r _ ( If "Other, " name the activity . ) Site Plan Approval Do you personally (or through your company, epourie, sibling, Parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the 'Town of Soui:hold7 "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage,' or business interest. "nusiness interest" means a business, including a partnership, :in which the town officer or employee has even a partial. ownership of (or employment; by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more Lhan 5% of the , shares YES NO X If you answered "YES. ". complete Lhe ' valance of this form and. date and sign where indicated. i Name of - person employed by the Town! of Southold . 'Title or position of that person . Describe the relationship between yo,urselE the applicant ) and the town officer or employee . Zither check the appropriate line A) through D) and/o;r describe in bile space provided . The town officer or employee oY his or her spouse , sibling., parent , or child is (check all that: apply ) 3 A) the owner of greater than .5% of• , Lhe shares of the corporate stock of Lhe applicant ( when the applicant: is a corporation ) ; B) the legal -or beneficial owner or any interest in a noncorpoeate entity (when il'ie applicant is not a corporation ) r C) an officer ; director ; partner , or employee of the applicant] or l)) the actual applicant . DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONS111P C,AgOL11N mate o1�iNegw Y� . a Nob OI CA5058769 S u b m i t Led L h i s day off r* f Qualified In Nassau Co — Catnmicsionxplr tU 15' S_ ytel of yew B ork 'Ise. ` M�omnuni cati ons Print name JOHN WALDEN — LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION ARTHUR V. JUNGE,who holds title to the premises-known as Section 96,Block 1,Lot 19.1 (the "Premises") and does hereby give consent to Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications (`Nextel') and its representatives, to bring such applications for municipal approvals including, but not limited to, application for Building Permit, application for Special Execption and application for Site Plan Approval, as may be necessary, to affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to existing monopole and install related equipment shelter at at the Premises. As such,I willfully cooperate with Nextel and its agents in obtaining any required approvals. ARTHUR V. JUNG ti- _ PROFESSIONAL ANTENNA SYSTEMS FOR 650 PANEL ANTENNA BROADCAST AND COMMUNICATIONS 13 dBd gain 806-894 MHz (broadband) 00y 60 or 12' electrical downtilt AMERICELU AMERICELL panels are part of a series of Scala professional antenna products for wireless communications,featuring: r F • Less tower loading than earlier panel designs, thanks to } 4 . v r smaller.size and lighter weight. • Very �rugged construction using materials selected for long, p k31 rF 1 life and reliability, including silver-plated co alodized aluminum backplate, and gray fiberglass adomes.s • Superior electrical.specifications,including low VSWR, wide /f!fr Ty bandwidth,flat frequency response and superb intermodulation f 1ri r performance. �- tE Specifications: Frequency q y 806-894.MHz(broadband) 'x"t �k Gain i rrr� 13 dBd " -Impedance 50 ohms 7 VSWR <1.3:1 Intermodulation(2x40w) IM3:-150dBc IM5:-160dBc Polarization Vertical Front-to-back ratio >20 dB u o. - Maximum input Power 500 watt s(at 50°c) x' H-plane beamwidth r'lfr' Ti 65 degrees(half-power) E-plane beamwidth 14 degrees(half-power). Electrical downtilt 0,6,or 12 degrees ' Termination N or 7/16 DIN female 270° -da_ `da- so^ Weight 13.4 lb(6.1 kg) Dimensions 51 x 10 x 4 inches (1295 x 254 x 102 mm) Equivalent flat plate area 3.5 n,(0.33 m2) Wind survival rating 120 mph(200 kph) Shipping dimensions " o. pp g 65 x 11 x 5 inches (1651 x 279 x 127 mm) H=plane Shipping weight 19 Ib(8.6 kg) Horizontal pattern—V-polarization Mounting Fixed and tilt-mount options are w0. available for 2 to 4.6 inch m (50 to 115 mm)OD masts. +, Panel can be inverted. 3 " See reverse for ° order information. o 6 S- o. SCALA ELECTRONIC CORPORATION n� Post Office Box 4580 = Phone: (541) 779-6500 " 'B Medford, OR 97501 (USA) Fax: (541) 779-3991 E-plane http://www.scala.net Vertical patpattern—V-polarization °•_ T: AMERICELL is a registered trademark of Scala Electronic corporation. _ 10035-E Scala Electronic Corporation is a member of the Kathrein Group SCALA AP13If 850/065 . P-ANEL ANTENNA. 13 dBd gain 806-894 MHz (broadband) 00 60 or 120 electrical downtilt 1�b m 0 0 0 0 0 0 m AMB-7 Mounting Kit Mounting Options: Model Description Stock Code ' 51 inches AMB-7 Mounting Kit for 2 to 4.6 inch 67175-007,w'J (1295 mm) (shown) (50 to 115 mm)OD mast. ASB-1 Three-panel Sector Mounting Kit 67175-100. (120 deg.ea.)for 2.375 to 6 inch (60 to 152 mm)OD mast. T13-5C Tilt Mount Kit 67450-052 0-15 degrees downtilt angle. ° 0 0 Order Information: Model Description Stock Code AP13-850/065N Antenna with N termination 64355-406 0°electrical downtilt AP13-850/065N/DT6 Antenna with N termination 64355-408 6°electrical downtilt AP13-850/065N/DT12 Antenna with N termination 64355-410 12°electrical downtilt AP13-850/065D Antenna with 7/16 DIN termination 64355-407 I _ 10 inches _I 0°electrical downtilt ff(254 mm) AP13-850/065D/DT6 Antenna with 7/16 DIN termination 64355-409 6°electrical downtilt w AP13-850/065D/DT12 Antenna with 7/16 DIN termination 64355-411 12°electrical downtilt SCALA ELECTRONIC CORPORATION :yam Post Office Box 4580 Phone: (541) 779-6500 Medford, OR 97501 (USA) Fax: (541) 779-3991 €: hftp://www.scala.net All specifications are subject to change without notice i i b,..t�v,i(uiuu� a kt, Ga:1F< E' id.µ 4n it i�a ,, w i �a qa, NEXT (IIEL COMMUNI�CATIONSq da , a � r � � ,, 'N m` yf Y .` IMF, g td1 �n X r ny f ks d o P"vV'M tira '' <<...x'3d a '4,ra f wE' a°�� r e9Y,* �`6 t i wiY" &,*k �. Tov�rno S uthhold 3, a MM EXlS1�t�G SITE-S1���' i, ,w: .. ,i I .�, °: a , a.�»���Ili 3ni .e ='' � � ``� � ., . ,;a��. yq. of ��I,I¢EN��1/ [ ���� d"„ .y 7r�N7, vs',��I�p ,d _ % ° �4 :' an> !p ,. .;., "�."`...".'k' .;.r. li': ""�Ii.' e.' til", ...s;;,d e.J M 71'61A "x -... a ` " �i i'flN W�S r i'u.,r`,,. MAP # SITE 1D � .r4DDRCSS ST�RiuCTURE �l��u� ` �LATITUDE(�t�LaNGTUDEv: .... r r�d n9 �a Yin a. _a 236 Third Street 1 NY1160 36 Third S re Monopole 125' 41-06-34 72-22-04 2 NY1162 Route 25 Tower 100, 41-02-29 72-27-31 Southold NY 3 NY1313 Elijah's Lane Monopole 100, 40-59-56 72-30-40 Southold NY PROPOSED S'1�; E lvt, m�,r /p� m�r�w - Il .gq.vY i, '.i�ro .gal" � �u�liG a i�TE�N��. 1 GH NIA' #. SITE rID ADBRESS STRUCTURE; � LATITU' � „E LONGITUDE .. ,� z.�SY k*i�^,aa ,. §"' ,pn liidi s „Pt '�'ate', n �G a�,�� { "�k F �A`G��iq,f ffii ��T) "hilt . "; ;;il N", � 4 P-NY2812 Route 48 Monopole 92' 40-01-50 72-29-49 Cutcho ue, NY 14-16-2 (2187)-7C j_ !..•..`;, 617.21 - SECT Appendix A 1 State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies .determine, in an orderly manner, whether a projet or action may be significant. The question of whether an action,may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequen ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determir significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environment; analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectin the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatio process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or actioi Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data .and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic pro Iec data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes, place in Parts 2 and 3. . Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts. that may occur from a prolect.or action. It provide guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be Considered small to moderate or whether it is a pbtentiallN large impact. The form also identifies whether.an.impact can be mitigated oe reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is"used to evaluate 'whether or not th impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—: :Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF Completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not -have a significant imp.ac[ on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.' • ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant.effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures,described in PART 3 have been required, .P. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will.be prepared.' . ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a.significant impact. . on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will he prepared. •'A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions ` Proposed Nextel Communications Public Utility Communications Facility NY2812 Peconic North ` Name of Action i Nrune of Lead Al;ency. .Print or Type Name of Responsible Of f icer iii Lead Agency Title of Responsible 'Of ficer Signature of Responsible Officer in Luad Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsibleofficer) Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant e on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consic -as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addit .information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available.and will not.im new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so'indicate and sp each instance. NAME OF ACTION Proposed Nextel Communications Public Utility Communications Facility NY2812 Peconic North LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) 21855 Count . Road 48 Cutcho ue Suffolk NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE . Nextel of New York 'Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications (516 )229-3936 ADDRESS One South Street . CITY/PO STATE 111530 ZIP CODEGarden City NY NAME OF OWNER(II dillerenl) I BUSINESS TELEPHONE Arthur' V Junge (631 ) 477-3655 ADDRESS PO Box 299 CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Orient I NY 111957-02-99' DESCRIPTION OF ACTION See Attachment Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site.Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. Y 1. Present land-use: OUrban Olndustrial ®Commercial L-14 idential (suburban) ORural (non-f ❑Forest • ❑Agriculture OOther 2. Total � of project area: 200± sq. ft. ;Represents area to be leased only. APPROXIMATE,ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIO Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acr, Forested acres acr Agricultural (Includes Orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acr Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECI.), acres acr Water Surface Area acres acr. Unvegetated (Rock, earth or f i II) 200± sq. ft. x acr. Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres 200± sq. ft. Other (Indicate type) acres ac�- 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project Site? _HaA Haven Loam, 0-'2 percent slope a. Soil drainage: INWell drained 100 ao rlf cite OMrlderately well drained °o of site ❑Poorly drained ",;, (if site b. 'If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are Hassifivd'within soil group 1 through d, of the Land Classification System? NIA acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are (here bedrock.outcroppings on project site? Oyes bNo tea. What is depth to bedrock? 955± (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage or proposed project,ite with slopes: ®0.10 10 100 % ❑'I0-150,S ' 0159,0 or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous' to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Natior Registers of Historic Places? • OYes IX1No 7.-Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes OI 8. What is the depth of the water table? 50± (in feet) 9. Is site located over a'primary, principal, or sole source aquifer?. ®Yes ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? OYes ®No 11. Does- project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened, or endangers 'OYes ®No According to. Preliminary site inspection Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formatioi OYes ®No Describe 13. Is the project ;its presently used by the community or neighborhood as, an open space or recreation ate OYes MNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes MNo 15. Streams within or.contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, g p ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: . _ a. Name None b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing n public utilities. �lYes ONo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?, IJYes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? L)Yes ONo On—site •:connection ':' 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-A Section 303 and 304? , ❑Yes ®No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes IJNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wasrim?_ ❑Yes ®No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by protect sponsor 0 acres. b. Project.ato�be'developed: 200 ± sq•ft initially; 200± sq.ft. XMM ultimately, c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NIA (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate perc vnt of cxpansimn proposed N/A f. Number of off-street parking; spaces existing; 0 proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated perrh 1* *one per month (upon complcfion of project)? one check h. If residential: Number and type of hmusing; units: equipment One Family Twn Fanul�• ?vtultiple I'amily Condominium Initially • Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height: width: length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public [homghfareproject will occupy is?' N/A See Attachment' ft.3 . 2. 'How much natural nra,a, d (i.e., ruck, earth, etc.) will bt! removr!d from the site.? 0 tonslcubic yarc 3. ,Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Oyes ONO MNJA a. If yes, for what intend. purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONO c. Will upper SLibsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Oyes ' ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this OYes ONO project? 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 1 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number),' b. Anticipated date of commencement phased month year, (including demolitio c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. :., .. ` •. d. Is phase 7 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes ONO 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3± ; after project is complete .0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? OYes . ENO If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste.disposal involved? OYes ®No (unmanned facility) a. If yes, indicate .type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid,waste disposal involved? OYes ONO Type _(unmanned facility) 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ®NO Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in'a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes IMNo . 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes ONO: (unmanned facility) a. If yes, what is .the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? OYes ONO c. If yes, give name locatibn d. Will any wastes nol go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes ONO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? UYes [MNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes j]No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than oiw hour`lu!r day)? OYes nklo . 20. Will project produce operating; noise ekceeding the 10Cal aniient. noise levels? GYes MNo . 21. Will project result in an increase in vrwrgy uiu? MYes ONu If yes , indicate type(s) minimal increase in electricity 22. If water supply iti from wall;, indicate rwmimig capacity NSA gallunsjmunrte. 23. Total anticipated wales usage per day 0 galloiWday. (unmanned facility) 2.1. Does protect involve Local. State or h-deral funding? ❑YCS IMNo If Yes, explain Z 4 -25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Dale City, Town, Village Board Oyes ®No City, Town, Village Planning Board fflYes ONo Site Plan Approval .City, Town Zoning Board OYes ONo City, County Health Department OYes ®No Other Local Agencies OYes ®No Other Regional Agencies OYes ®No State Agencies OYes ®No Federal Agencies OYes INNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning.or zoning decision? ®Yes ONo If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment Ozoni'ng variance Ospecial use permit ❑subdivision ®site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ©other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? — Light 'Industry 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Site is developed 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? no change proposed 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? MYes ON( 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? Agricultural, Municipal (Collection Center) Commercial, Residential/A—C, L1, L10, B' 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 'A mile? ®Yes pNc 9. If the proposed .action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? . N/A . a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of'9ewer or water districts? OYes ®Nc 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police fire protection)? OYes C1No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle proi(fcted demand? ❑Yes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? OYes ®No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? OYes ONo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts ania the measures which you propose to mitigate ov avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided abovo is true to the hest of my knowledge. Nextel ommunications by Preudenthal Applicant;Sperosor Mne __Elkowit - 4ongulting Group, Inc. Date Ju1y 6, 2001 Signature Title Project Manager G watra If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a slate agency, complete the Coaslal Assessment Form before proceeding. with this assessment. 5 J `.::RL 4"vv-r*. ..t t.".•ri.�tn°u.y ........... Sk�"'�••• fi - ._ _ t � CKT 11,13 CK7 S '------- Maruai Transfer CKT 33is — NDM ROOM Sisitch rn 0 U-ftq�WBreaker Panel 4 , 6 v Surge Arrestor GKT 38 $ rh-4 , % 4 CKT 31 Vlo Te��Ala = I poib ,�9$E,3! r .. .... .... — Wri .. CKT 22,24 for Light , s EN _ " CKT YJ 60 Watt — is 2• � ---... .Lead Lag ' AJC Control W/Motion Sensor ' is IV— co Equip. 3 CKT 41 � n --1 Pourer Envy Telco eleav 4� Electrical Plan r � � �� 4'-60 4'-6° °41_6 4-0 5'-0° 4'-0° 3'-0" 2'-00 LtgMing Fixtures Ltthonia C232120 or equal 1tUtes) (L ' cable (18°) Fluorescent Tubes Sylvania F032l13ta(Plo $� I. g halo) I n & _ X NOTE: I.The Cable ladder shall be Uni-Strut, o -Z r Newton or approved-equivalent MT 38 Gap all exposed ends of cable traysis See Note 2 f 2. Rectifier drops.run 2 conduits.from �- — ower panel to ceiling.faun 4 ckts. p See Note I S In each conduit.Provide S' of Flexible T 30 conduit., provide a straight and CKT s p 100, l4f series Exterior Light connector for each flext le conduit. Millatt Sensor Each circuit shall extend no less than 2' past the end of the flexible conduit containing ite�Label ir.611 tw,ogethedr.cable tie wires From = Emergency Light 3. All Electrical components to be.UL listed. r l l lectec :eilin ref 2 Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" Nextel of New York, Inc., d/b/a Nextel Communications Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility, Site-NY2812 Peconic North 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue Town of Southold Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Attachment Description of Action The proposed action consists of the addition of 12(twelve)communications antennas to the existing 105t foot above grade level (agl)monopole. In addition, an equipment shelter will be constructed within a fenced area adjacent to the existing equipment compound to house the associated communications equipment. The equipment will be attached to the antennas via elevated cable support. B.1J Dimensions of largest proposed structure The Nextel pre-fabricated equipment shelter measures 10 feet wide by 20 feet long.The shelter will extend to a height of 11 feet 2 inches agl. The antennas will.be attached to the existing.105± foot monopole at a height of 80f feet agl, extending to 82±feet agl. SITE NAME: DATE ORDERED: SITE #: PROJECT MANAGER DATE NEEDED BY: EXTERIOR FINISH: MODEL:OTHER MANUFACTURER:KULLMAN SPECIAL DETAILS: ' r, - - �—[. IL __'ice{= .-_- ._ •�„"--_ �'_ - i _ i'� I ii 1 i I�l I 11 '! I.��. 1'I r II I_ - I i �__ i'1 t==? ' III Ii I � � I i' :� I Ij I•'� ! '�a ' l E ` U I _ III . _ ' i�� �I j III„t"'`F--') I - -- -- =-z;-��I�!+'.—T-s—,i-+-'I I�h p i;i' � I • I II �• Ir-t—II"�! ! I 1 ! 1 I!1 �'� ��:�I a P I b!!€!' i 2 onMOJU L / onE,oP1 I r 1 !C ,; I 1 n— i4--�----� E• l:� .mot{--.-,.. ---_€ o nM.0 r12 � � ! ;; - �- � , - III � I I I - • I��1 ` ` � Il 1 I�i1 T ' �i. '�[1�i ' J. i I I !'li!, on MID n3 �3 onEZoP3 Town Of Southold P.O Box1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 10/12/01 Receipt#: 1023669 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $217.50 Check#: 1023669 Total Paid: $217.50 i- �rr" ' I 111' 'I i OCT 15 2001 `--} Name: Next el Comm. Sctm#1000-96=1-19.1 Clerk ID: JOYCEW Intemal ID:41153 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSQ�®SUFF011r MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE G Southold, NY 11971 Chair ti v. OFFICE LOCATION: RICHARD CAGGIANO O • Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J. CREMERS 1 �aO� 54375 State Route 25 KENNETH L.EDWARDS (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 7, 2004 Mr. George Obsuth Construction Project Mgr. Nextel Communications Two Industrial Avenue Fairfield, NJ 07004 Dear Mr. Obsuth: RE: SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 The Planning Board held a work session on December 6, 2004 at which they accepted the shrub replacement proposed in your November 17 letter. Please let us know when the project is completed so that we may schedule a site visit inspection. Very truly yours, Bruno S on Sr. Site Plan Reviewer cc: Planning Board ; W`Y Northeast'Ste Develo`ry mentr& Ent mee"nn , E�. P 9 9 November 17, 2004 Mr. Bruno Simone Town of Southold Planning Department 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 RE: Nextel Communications Site#NY2812 Peconic North 21855 Old Contry Road 48 Cutchogue NY 11706 Dear Mr. Simone, It's my suggestion that we replace the dead Arborvitae with Red Cedar in its place. The Arborvitae appears to have died due to lack of water and sandy soil conditions. As observed the Red Cedar is indigenous to the area and should thrive very well under these conditions. Moving forward,please,notify of your approval. Ve rul Y/�u s v� ii11?/v y Ge rge Obsuth Nextel Communications Construction Project Manager . 2 Industrial Avenue Fairfield, NJ 07004F15) Mobile 973-418-9002 t <7r—` NOV 3 0 2004 ;'J -- Ali HIGHLANDER CONSULTANTS, INC. September 24, 2004 0 Planning Board Office, Town of Southold P. O. Box 1179 SEP 2 7 2004 Southold,NY 11971 Southold Town Attention: Ms. Valerie Sculpaz I Planning Board Re: Permit No. 29861Z 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue Our File No: NY2812 Dear Ms. Sculpaz: Please schedule a final planning inspection for the above referenced site. A copy of the Building Permit is enclosed herewith. Also enclosed is a copy of the letter from the planning board dated August 13, 2002, indicating that the resolution was approved. Please advise us of when this final inspection will be effected so that we may obtain a final certificate of occupancy. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Q k QKjJ- J y dey -- Cc: Building Inspector Town of Southold 99 West Main Street,East Islip,N.Y. 11730 (631) 581-8105 Office, (631) 581-8205 Fax 1 c903 15:21- _ 73239099( SEA NETWORK SERVI PAGE 6Z-02 - mow., i•.•c r NL----'L C0M'4AJICATIQNS ` 914 421. 2610 P.03 FORM 190. 3++ TOWN OF SOUTHQLD BUILDING DEPA,R Town Hall Southold, N, . BUTMING p T (THIS PERMIT MUST BE nPT ON THE PREMISES MWIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) ]?ER XT No. 2 9 61 Z Date NO'VEMBER 10, 2003 Permission is hereby granted to: ARTHUR V AGE PO BOX 299 QRxENT,NY 1x957 _ for CO-LOCATION OF AN AMEN?v"A ON AN EXISTING TE�,ECON1�l?1ICATZONS TOWER AND CONSTRUCTION OF RELATED STORAGE FACILITY AS PER ZHA #5127 at presses located at 23855 CR 48 CU2CHOGUE County' Tax, MP No- 973889 Section 096 $lcck 0001 Lat Na. 019.001 , pursuant to APplication dated NOVEMBER 6, 2 0 0 3 and approved by the Builditg inspector to expire on MA 10, 2005. Fee $ 200 . OQ Authorize Sigxiature LL, .ev. 51s/02 COPY TOTRL P.03 09/23/2004 13:39 6314254104 "' MUNLEYMEAD PAGE 01 FROM SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING IRD FAX NO, 631. 765 3136 riep. 30 2003 02:36PM P2 �.r• 7w PLANNMG BOARD ME BUS �OgNFFOd� M �'�� P.O.F 1179 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. C��rman � Town Hall, 5309.35 State Route 25 q Southold,New,York 11971-0959 RICHARD C,AGGL4 40 � ► Telephone 08:0 765.1938 WILLLkU J.CREMERg O� Pax(6311 755-3196 RENNETH L.EAWA.RD9 MARTIN SIDOR,JR. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ' August 13, 2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R6 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 760'west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: Ll, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the'Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 12,20.02. The final public hearing was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Nextel Communications is the lease holder and Arthur Junge is the owner of the property known and designated als NeKtel Antenna Site, located on the r,o►th side of CR 48 in Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, this site plan for Naxtel Communications is to affix a wireless telecommunications antenna to an existing monopole and install a related equipment shelter; and WHEREAS,this site plan was certified by the Building Department on August 12, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Town Engineer has reviewed the drainage calculations and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval;and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this actio!1 i9 a Type I Action and not subject to review•under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617; and 09/23/2004 13:39 6314254104 MUNLEYMEAD PAGE 02 FROM SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING IRD FAX NO. 631 765 3136 Rep. 30 2003 02:3GPM P3 S�extei Communications—Page Two—8/131Q2 WHEREAS, a variance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 2f 2002 to allow the placement of an equipment building at less than the required 70 feet-from the rear property line; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was plosed on said application at Town Hall, Southold, New York on August 12, 200�; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the surveys, dated May 22, 2001 and last revised August 22, 2001, and authorize Jio Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to a one year review from the dEite of the building permit. Enclosed please find two copies of the approved site plan; one for your record::and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your building permit. Please contact this office if your have any gWestions regarding the above. Very truly yours, annett r owski, .J�>> Chairman (�' encl. cc: Building Dept., Tax Assessors • r� F7� 14.4� �. t2 34.6 wagm crffm r EXISTfNG OED AT THE '"T"?NAL AErM r • ATIONS APPRO ED BY }'XSURVEY., Pl.Ald�6lN BOARD PECONIC NORTH c,' civic r?�. TOWN OF �OUTHOLD NY-28�2 t> T {f A010670) DST AUt3 67 COUNTY ROAD 48 CUTCHOGLE, NY rrn" L-, N m SITE PLAN cn m DAM Pl officr Np= v 5/22/01 04-3976 • m 9CAIPa N DRAgvim NW AS NOTED . c NORTH FMCKM Br- �. .� i Submission Without a Co er Letter Se d.er: Subject: C SCTM#: Y 000- Ci 4.-k6-<Y� rr Comments: pECE VE NOV 1 4 2003 Jul Southold Town Planning Board �Tl�oGv� etivA11 Mal a k " ���d � � � #M � 5 �d,, � R W � Nd u.�� i k yyk_, �� Iad�: A f 1 I ♦. `fw, ��� ��I a'�� 'Y+4,� r.�x o ,;ele �T� � •s � II�IIIIII IIIIIIIII'lll '�i, y 1„ .$.. r;. .t- vp "' �.__,.. � �:\: �� � / . \ \ice y> � � . &yyw e . . . . . • . ; : ... , / . . a < � � 2�/< � � . ` � `��� ` � \ .\a� \ � \ �� . <. , « .<, : " . ' � : . �� � � . � 1 > � : . > � � � ! . � t . . � . >� . � ^ ~ � � ��\\ � . � � . !�\ . �\ „ � � \ �ƒy � � � �y \ � � � . . , . � � � � � ` . . \ . � . ° v � � � � . � � � ��� g1 » � . . . � . . .yg \§: «, 2, . . . . _ ,«« �� � � \ � . * ` � � � \ . �\ , � ` � �- ^ ^ . ©»j : w�: . . , . �� . . « � � � � ©�\���\\\� ,�x«< . . . . <�����y. y \�? . ���w�d z Sue UFFO� sI� h Z Town Hall,53095 Main Road p • Fax(631)765-1823 P.O.Box 1179 y�O �ap� Telephone(631)765-1802 Southold,New York 11971-0959 ( BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Orlowski PlanningBoard Chairman f AU6 12 2002 FROM: Michael J. Verity, Building Department Southold Town DATE: August 12, 2002 Plankm Board REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Arthur Junge (NEXTEL) Location: 21855 County Route 48, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000—Section 96 -Block 1 —Lots 18.1 Date: May 22, 2001 Revised Date: August 22, 2001 1: ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 45 AND 100 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF _ THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. *THE PROPOSED USE wireless communication equipment facility IS/ARE A PERMITTED USE IN THIS LI DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. * See Board of Appeals Appl. No. 5127 for setbacks. 1 Michael J. Verity Principal Building Inspector A MEMO TO: Michael Verity, Building Department FROM: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman max/ CC: Betty Neville, Town Clerk DATE: August 12, 2002 RE: Appl. No. 5127 — Nextel (A. Junge, Owner) Findings, Deliberations and Determination This memo will correct the error in the Determination for Application No. 5127 — Nextel dated July 25, 2002 to read as follows: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: equipment shelter building at 30 feet (not 38 feet). Kindly reflect your file to read same. Thank you. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERSSUFFO(�- ��� L'pG Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman =� y� 53095 Main Road Lydia A. Tortora y P.O. Box 1179 George Horning • Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ruth D. Oliva ZBA Fax(631) 765-9064 Vincent Orlando l �►a Telephone(631)765-1809 1 http:// 1Q .orhfor�kxe5 ;.,� BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JULY 25, 2002 AUG ® G 2��2 Appl. No. 5127—NEXTEL (A. Junge,Owner) Southold Town Property Location: 21855 C.R. 48 (Middle Road), Cutchogue Parcel: 96-1-19.1 Plan- na-Ocard SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned as a setback request. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is located on the north side of C.R. 48 in Cutchogue, with 45,589 sq. ft. of land area and road frontage of 168.17 ft. The property is immediately adjacent to the Landfill at the north side. To the west are residences, and to the east, vacant land. The property is located in the Light Industrial Zone District and improved with an existing Telecommunications Tower, and business buildings. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's March 6, 2002, Amended March 11, 2002 Notice of Disapproval denying a permit to construct-an equipment shelter (storage building) for the reason that the building is proposed in a location at less than 70 feet from the rear property line. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on July 25, 2002, at which time written and oral evidence was presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and the area, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant. 3D AREA VARIANCE RELIEF RE ESTED: Applicant's request a location of a proposed 12'8" x 20'8" equipment shelter building at feet from the rear property line. This shelter building is shown at the northwest section of the property near the existing one-story masonry building and existing monopole structure. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted, and personal inspections,the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the area variance will not produce an undesirable change in character of neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The Telecommunications Law requires co-location on existing towers. This property contains an existing tower, and applicant's proposed a co-locate of an antenna in accordance with the codes. The need for an equipment shelter building is in support of the co- location. The existing Telecommunications Tower sits approximately 41 feet to the rear property line, and there is a need for this building to be as close to the tower as possible. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for applicant to pursue, other than an area variance because of environmental constraints and because the proposed location is the most beneficial to the applicants and the neighborhood. The requested variance is not Page 2—July 25,2002 ZBA Appl.No.5127—Nextel 96-1-19.1 at Cutchogue unreasonable and is within keeping of the many regulations pertaining to public utility uses and transmission towers. 3. The area variance is not substantial, will be one-story in height, and exceeds the setback requirements which apply to similar types and designs of accessory storage structures in this and all other zone districts. 4. The proposed variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. No evidence has been submitted to suggest the new location of the equipment shelter structure will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The applicant will provide landscaping for buffering, to screen outside of the fence area. The Board suggests five-foot arborvitae, planted four feet apart, to be continuously maintained. However, the Board reserves the right to review this buffering layout if screening is not adequately followed by applicant relative to this particular area. 5. In considering this application, the Board deems this action to be the minimum necessary and adequate for the applicants to enjoy the benefit of a new accessory equipment shelter, and that the grant of this variance will preserve the character of the neighborhood, and the health, safety, welfare of the community. BOARD RESOLUTION: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Tortora, seconded by Chairman Goehringer, and duly carried,to: GRANT the variance as applied for, and shown on the site plan drawings SP-land SP-2 dated 5/22/O1, revised 8/22/01,by William F. Collins,A.I.A. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: ers oe er (C an), Tortora, Horning, and Orlando. (Member Oliva was absent.) is Res io was d do (4-0). GG:lk r erard P. Goehringer, Chairm 8-1-02 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� G�j� P.O. Box 1179 Chairman p !� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Z Southold,New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS �y Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO j PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 9, 2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 8, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hold open the final public hearing regarding the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications, which was opened on January 14, 2002. The next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting will be held on August 12, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBF�, S�FF�(� P.O. Box 1179 BENNET hO1RLOIWSKI,JR. =�O Gy Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 rm WILLIAM J.CREMERS N Z Southold,New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS w Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. ®y �� Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO �fol �aO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 14, 2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 13, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hold open the final public hearing regarding the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications, which was opened on January 14, 2002. The next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting-will be held on June 10, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, J� � Chairman PLANNING BO LR OD MIEMB I ®�OS�FFO(�CO� P.O. Box 1179 Chairman �� yJ� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLLAIVI J.CREMERS CODZ Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS V- T Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. ip �� Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 9, 2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 8, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hold open the final public hearing regarding the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications, which was opened on January 14, 2002. The next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting will be held on May 13, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, 0 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �`�` Gy P.O. Box 1 179 Chairman c Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J.CREMERS co Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS O .lC Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y� 0� Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 12, 2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 11, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hold open the final public hearing regarding the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications, which was opened on January 14, 2002. The next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting will be held on April 8, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, 0666 nett Orlowski Jr. Chairman J PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Q$uFFa��C BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman C ?'� P.O.Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS cz = Southold,New York.11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS �y • �� Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO 4 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 12, 2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 11, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hold open the final public hearing regarding the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications, which was opened on January 14, 2002. The next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting will be held on March 11, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, 4 en�trSi, Jr. J e Chairman . J MUNLEY� MEADE9 NIELSEN & RE K ATTORNEYS AT LAW REPLY TO: ❑ REPLY TO: 160 MIDDLE NECK ROAD 36 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE GREAT NECK, NEW YORK 11021 HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 (516) 487-6500 (631) 425-4100 TELECOPIER TELECOPIER (516) 487-6539 (631) 425-4104 January 29, 2002 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL Chairman Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 RE: Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications Premises: 21855 County Road 48 Cuthchogue,New York 11935 S CTM#: 1000-96-1-19.1 Dear Chairman Orlowski: We are the attorneys for Nextel Communications, the applicant for Site Plan Approval in the above matter. The application last appeared on the Planning Board's agenda on January 14, 2002. At that time, the hearing was held open until the February 11, 2002 meeting to allow the applicant time to research the necessity for an area variance. We are in the process of preparing an application to the Board of Zoning Appeals. For that reason, kindly continue to hold this matter open on the Planning Board's calendar until such time as the Zoning Board has made its determination. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE,NIELSEN&RE By: kc,-W�AeLfA - Jacqueline Caputi /;c JAN 312002 holdTown Planning 8tard euf MUNLEY9 MEADE, NIELSEN & RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW REPLY TO: ❑ REPLY TO: [� 160 MIDDLE NECK ROAD 36 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE GREAT NECK, NEW YORK 11021 HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 (516) 487-6500 (631) 425-4100 TELECOPIER TELECOPIER (516) 487-6539 (631) 425-4104 January 16, 2002 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL N f 1) Department of Planning, Attn: Carol ✓)��1' :�, 1 �'L�,' i Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold New York 11971 .JAN 18 2002 RE: Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications southoid Town Premises: 21855 County Road 48 Cuthchogue,New York 11935 �������� � S CTM#: 1000-96-1-19.1 Dear Carol: In accordance with our phone conversation of today's date, enclosed please find the Affidavit of Posting, certified mail receipts and the two green cards that were returned to us. My client is exploring the option of relocating its equipment shelter. If that is not possible, we will promptly make an application to the Zoning Board for the necessary variance. Accordingly, kindly keep this matter on the Planning Board's agenda for the February 11, 2002 meeting and I will advise you prior to that time of our intentions. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY,MEADE, NIELSEN&RE By: . Aou Jacqueline Caputi /j c . Enclosure AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as Cutchogue Auto Precision, 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York by placing the Town's official poster notices(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on January 14, 2002 , 1Mve sent notices, by certified mail, the receipts of which are attached, to the owners of iecord of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the above mentioned property on January 2 2002 Gale A. Jeffery Julie L. Miknis** Your name (print) Signature Lake Grove, New York 11755 / 32 Grant Place Glen Cove, New York 11549 Address January 11, 2002 Date, Notary Public P JACQUELINE CAPUTI � WM Public State of New Yak No.489403�-Suffolk Coun Cmnmission Exoires April 20,�'-=- PLEASE RETURN THIS A.FFIDA W T AND CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS ON THE DA r OF, OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING Re: Proposed site plan of Nextel Communications SCTM#: 1000-96-1-19. 1 Date of Hearing:Mon January 14, 2002, 6:10 p.m. J PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ��OSufF�`�CC BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� G.f, P.O. Box 1179 Chairman C Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLI AM J.CREMERS y Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS O Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y� �� Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO 0.( `t►a PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 15, 2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hold open the final public hearing regarding the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications, which was opened on January 14, 2002. The next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting will be held on February 11, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman �oS�FFO(�co y Town Hall,53095 Main Road 0 Fax(631)765-1823 P.O.Box 1179 Iji �� Telephone(631)765-1802 Southold,New York 11971-0959 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD i MEMORANDUM To: Victor L'Eplattenier, Senior Planner From: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Re: Nextel Communications—Junge Property SCTM: 1000-96-1-19.1 Date: January 14,2002 Preexisting towers shall be allowed to continue their usage as they presently exist. New construction shall adhere to the setbacks for principal uses in the Bulk Schedule applicable to the zone in which the structure is located. Therefore, the proposed equipment facility requires a variance for the rear yard setback. f-' r, l ill- �'�•':l,fl-F,r'y 4 l i 1U �L IiIJ��1iJ �11 1 JAN 15 2002 Southdd Town PDaifmfin i �l � Sb4r VL JOSHUA Y. HORTON =�° °°y� JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR y i ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516)-765-1366 *1 • Q�� Tel.(516)-765-1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 14, 2002 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board - �.,�,P Town Hall, 53095 Main Road ^ IJ�.i � � Southold, New York 11971 i JJ. Re: NEXTEL Communications -� State Route 48, Cutchogue JAN 1 4. 2uU2 SCTM #: 1000 - 96 - 01 - 19.1 South d Town Dear Mr. Orlowski: p� GZGJQ g7 Boa rd As per your request, I have reviewed the site plan dated 05/22/01 that was prepared by the office of William F. Collins, AIA for the above referenced project. The project includes the installation of a new equipment shed for the existing facility. This shed will be used to expand the capabilities of the existing monopole tower located at the site. The drainage requirements to handle a two inch rainfall falling on a two hundred square foot shed would be minimal. Due to the size of the lot and the amount of existing landscaping surrounding the proposed project additional drainage structures would not be recommended. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. inc rely, James A. Richter, R.A. cc: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) o��gOFFO��-co o� Gyp y Town Hall,53095 Main Road 0 Fax(631)765-1823 P.O.Box 1179 �i Telephone(631)765-1802 Southold,New York 11971-0959 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Victor L'Eplattenier, Senior Planner From: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Re: Nextel Communications-Junge Property SCTM:1000-96-1-19.1 Date: January 14, 2002 Preexisting towers shall be allowed to continue their usage as they presently exist. New construction shall adhere to the setbacks for principal uses in the Bulk Schedule applicable to the zone in which the structure is located. Therefore, the. proposed equipment facility requires a variance for the rear yard setback. O��S�FFO(,�co JOSHUA Y. HORTON �� as JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR y ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516)-765-1366 y Tel.(516)-765-1560 col � Sao OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 14, 2002 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman -Planning Board- Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: NEXTEL Communications JAN 14 AV State Route 48, Cutchogue SCTM #: 1000 - 96 - 01 — 19.1 Southold Town Dear Mr. Orlowski: Planning Board As per your request, I have reviewed the site plan dated 05/22/01 that was prepared by the office of William F. Collins, AIA for the above referenced project. The project includes the installation of a new equipment shed for the existing facility. This shed will be used to expand the capabilities of the existing monopole tower located at the site. The drainage requirements to handle a two inch rainfall falling on a two hundred square foot shed would be minimal. Due to the size of the lot and the amount of existing landscaping surrounding the proposed project additional drainage structures would not be recommended. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my-office. inc rely, James A. Richter, R.A. cc: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) facsimile TRANS M I TTA L Date: 1 :2 TO: T19 ( ' Cp y �Z//``E C /9 PC1 % 46�Y Q. Fax #. y J Re: Pages: (including , cover) From. Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, W 11971 Phone: (516) 765-1938 Fax#: (516) 765-3136 BOARD OF APPEL A , TOWN OF SOUTgOLD D May 28, 1998 JUN Southold Town Planning Board Lawrence Ray) Esq. Munley Meade Nielsen .& Re 160 Middle Neck Road Great Neck, NY 11021 RE: Nextel Co-Location of Antennas 1000-108-4-11.3 Ray: Regular Meeting, the Dear Mr.• 1.998 Regu tion to This will- confirm that at our May 14'for a Special .E'J e- our application 0 discussed y telecommunications tower nenBMR entire Board antennas to existing wo GPN antennas the -Board affix three whip shed and pad with place accessory . Based on Sections 100-233B, mounted on shelter. , 1997 Telecommunic ionwhich antenna of Southold s 4022SE and 4023 t determined that the Town under Nos. At the shad revious rulings. exception review.) which supersedes its .p anew special former geSolution conditions- required the the Board rescinded public hearing time> a Lication f or a p osition to calendared this pp ou are now in a. p Permit suggested that y a building p Board MemberW the Building Department for with this pro3ect. make application Provisions of law for review under other Very y Y rs, P. GOEHRINGER /GERARD CHAIRMAN Enclosure cc: s (Application) / planning Board ✓#4753) Town ClerpeRe :artmentP Building PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �OSUFFO��CO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� G Chairman P.O. Box 1179. co WILLIAM J.CREMERS v� Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATH",JR. ,L Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 14th day of January, 2002 on the question of the following: 6:00 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed minor subdivision of Robert Schreiber. The property is located on the north side of Oregon Road, approximately 350' west of the intersection of Alvah's Lane & Oregon Road in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-95-1-4 6:05 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed lot line change for Gerard Goehringer/Agnes McGunnigle. SCTM#1000-106-6-14 is located on the northeast corner of Bay View Avenue & Cox Neck Road; SCTM#1000-106-6-16.2 is located on the north side of Bay View Avenue in Mattituck. 6:10 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Nextel Communicatii n jhe property is located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 6,15 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Pellegrini Vineyards. The property is located at 23005 Main Road in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-109-1-8.7 Dated: 12/14/01 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 3, 2002 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPIES SENT TO: The Suffolk Times J P.O. Box 1179 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 • own Phone: (631) 765-1938 Planning Board Fax: (631) 765-3136 E-Mail: planning@southold.org Fax. To: The Suffolk Times From: Valerie Scopaz/carol Fax: Pages: 2 Phone: Date: 12/14/01 Re: Legal Ad for 1/3/02 Edition CC: Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply As Requested Please print the following legal ad in the 1/3/02 edition. Thanks.Meeting: 1/14/02 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Robert Schreiber Minor Subdivision 6:05 p.m. Goehringer/McGunnigle Lot Line Change 6:10 p.m. Nextel Communications Site Plan 6:15 p.m. Pellegrini Vineyards Site Plan PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� ��j Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman ?'� P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS C* Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGLANO y�Q! �aO� PLANNING BOARD'OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 14th day of January, 2002 on the question of the following: 6:00 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed minor subdivision of Robert Schreiber. The property is located on the north side of Oregon Road, approximately 350' west of the intersection of Alvah's Lane & Oregon Road in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-95-1-4 6:05 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed lot line change for Gerard Goehringer/Agnes McGunnigle. SCTM#1000-106-6-14 is located on the northeast corner of Bay View Avenue & Cox:Neck Road; SCTM#1000-106-6-16.2 is located on the north side of Bay View Avenue in Mattituck. 6:10 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications. The property is located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 6:15'P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Pellegrini Vineyards. The property is located at 23005 Main Road in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-109-1-8.7 Dated: 12/14/01 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New.York being duly sworn, says that on the 14th day of December, 2001 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial,manner, in a most public place in the Town'of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 1114102 Reaular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the Minor Subdivision of Robert Schreiber SCTM#1000-95-1-4 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the Lot Line Change of Goehringer/McGunnigle SCTM#1000-106-6-14 & 16.2 6:10 p.m. Public Hearing for the Site Plan of Nextel Communications SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 6:15 p.m. Public Hearing for the Site Plan for Pellegrini Vineyards SCTM#1000-109-1-8.7 Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this `/ day of , 2001. LINDAj.COOPER �— No'ary Public,State of New fork Notary Public No.4E22563,Suffiolk County Torrm Expires Decernber31, C�o.Y f' r '%�,��Notice of Pplrilid Heai3ng,H � ��;, ���' NOTICE•�iS HE,RE$'Y GI�/EN that r-. j;'pdrsuansrt Section�276rof,the Towrlu; f:�.aLdw and`Article.X�CY of,thewCode of'ihe Tovt�t IOf�Southold a pubic peancig will;. .:be held,by the Squihold Town�'lamm�g,; Board at the Town Hall .IyIam Road Southold Neworkti sa1c�Tpwc on the STATE OF NEW YORK) 14th Siaypf January;2002�On tfi q bs )SS' I M n. r rtr` Cr- F .F lion of the fo�lo tng Y R .' 6 QQO0,p to�'ubhcl��anng for the pror.' CO NTY OF SU In .poser tniior subtlivastonf Robert d� �jN l Of Mattituck, in said Schreiber.The property is locatedt on he north side ofl Oregon Road,�apgroxi s county, being duly sworn, says that he/she is '*tinafely 35U test of the int�rsectton'o� Alvah s Lane & Oregon' Road gin' Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly sIah�cnk; 1irlcio95 newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of a6 OS p tnPuhhck;$eanng for the pro-.a dosed lok hpe changeiir cerara Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, r'r'ger�Aghes M�ct,°nY le seTtii:, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed �;#1000 lOG 6 14�s,locatea�, horth-3. i 41t1Cr o , u9 copy,has been regularly published in said Newspaper ecx Road scTNlooa>o 6 2�S _ once each week for weeks succes- located on the-north sae of$ayview (ve�iue inMathtuck°I ttaiF: 41M sivel commencing on the day 61p p x!'ttbhcfeanng fore�pd 20 pos�'d.� si�e plan for, �x�Ir; o($nSurucahons�T�e propenyris locat � � � ed oii the Borth siaeivf CR 48`750{West � tSf qx s I anew in Cutchogue N"R- #1 '6 i49 I�, � , �ft A f },; Principal dlerk _' 6 f5 p•m�1?ubb�icHeanng for the pro-::" posea site planzLOY'Pellegnm Vineyards:`';, The property is located at 23005 Main.: Sworn to before me this Roadii Cutchogut4 SCTM#f1001)-100 day 20 3--87c x Dated T,INO Y� 3 $ ORDER OF THE Nol L RAINE KLOPFER 1 SOi'. OLD TOWN a i rV Public,State o€Now York r PLANNING B6ARD " No.4828373 f C,.Miali-d'-SuliolkCounty eitnett Orlowsla JrCha►rmau 24]52 1TJ3 n ,. PlrEs Nov.3Q I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ��� ��j Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman yet P.O.Box 1179 CM WILLIAM J.CREMERS dM Southold,New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS �y • �� Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. ,L Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGL&NO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 11, 2001 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 4.8, 750'west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold.Town Planning Board on Monday December 10, 2001: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, January 14, 2002, at 6:10 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated May 22, 2001. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board office, Southold town Hall. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting, proof of certified mailing, and the signed green return receipts from the certified mailings on the day of the public hearing before 4:00 p.m. The sign and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board office after the public hearing. A copy of the Negative Declaration is enclosed for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Encl. t PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ��� ��jy Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman P.O. Box 1179 C WILLIAM J.CREMERS CD Southold, New York 11971-0959 co KENNETH L.EDWARDS k- • Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant December.10, 2001 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Nextel Communications SCTM#: 1000-96-1-19.1 Location: CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This proposed site plan is to affix a wireless telecommunications antenna to an existing monopole & install a related equipment shelter. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. t SEQR Negative Declaration - Page Two For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (631) 765-1938 cc: Roger Evans, DEC Stony Brook Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Applicant Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the L-I (Light Industrial) Zoning District; 4. That the application is an amendment to affix a new wireless antenna to an existing monopole and install a related equipment shelter on 1.05 acres of property located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane in Cutchogue; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 3 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, January 14, 2002 at 6:10 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least 'five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Nextel Communications/Arthur Junge Date: 12/14/01 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notices(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on have sent notices, by certified mail, the receipts of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the above mentioned property on Your name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDA WAND CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS ON THE DA 1I OF, OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING Re: Pro.posed site plan of Nextel Communications SCTM#: 1000-96-1-19. 1 Date of Hearing:Mon. . January 14, 2002, 6:10 p.m. i § 58-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1 Chapter 58 NOTICE OF PUBLIC REARING § 58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12-27-1995 as L.L. No. 25-1995. Amendments noted where applicable.] §58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon.The board or commission reviewing an application shall provide.for the giving of notice: A. By-causing a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. -By requiring the applicant to erect the sign provided by the town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application abuts, giving notice of the application, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than ten (10) feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven (7) days immediately preceding the date .of the public hearing. The applicant or his/her agent shall file an affidavit.that s/he has complied with this,provision. C. By requiring the applicant to send notice to the owners of record of every property which 'abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street. 5801 1-25-9 § 58-1 SOUTHOLD CODE § 58-1 from the property included in the application. Such notice. shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven (7) days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The applicant or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. 5802 1-z6-es ARTHUR JUNGE NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1000 =96 = 1 = 19ml Site Plan Amendment to affix a new wireless antenna to an existing monopole and install a related equipment shelter. MON . .- JANUARY 14, 2002 - 6 : 10 P . M . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �Q$VFFD��C BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �% OG Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman o y� P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS COO = Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax(631) 765-3136 IA RICHARD CAGGNO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 6, 2001 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Zone.: LI, Light Industry Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 5, 2001: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, a Jte - Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman w r �- PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �StfFQ(�►C BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� QG Town'Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman � P.O.Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Southold,New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS - Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO yifJol �aO� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 2001 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The.purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: tYi -A,TZAL C 6 -AnAA7, C11 T101-Y S Requested Action: f /X 1.ri1 R 64 9:5 SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type ( Unlisted Contact'Person: I` k/� ss (631) 765-1938 J Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (VI This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) r Comments: VV Please feel free to contact this office for further information. truly yours, ennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Board of Appeals Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Public Works ion Tho a � c Da;4 age Administrator S *Maps are enclosed for your review. U7,)-7C t 16'2 (21 • 617.21 S Appendix A r State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies:determine, in an orderly manner, whether a pri or action may be significant. The question of whether an action,may be significant is not always easy to answer. Fregi ly, ,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who deters significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be. technically expert in environmi analysis. In addition,'many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affei the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determine process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or ac Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: : Part l: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic prc data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts,•that may occur from a proiect or action. It prov guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potenEi large impact. The form also identifies whether.an•impact can-be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE=—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 0 Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upori review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and an,y other supportin information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each 'impact, it is reasonably determined by th lead agency that: ❑ A. The project•will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will no -have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant.effect on the environment, there will not be a significan effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been requirec therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in.one or more large and important impacts.that may have a.significant impac on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will he 'prepared. "A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Proposed Nextel Communications Public Utility Communications Facility NY2812 Peconic North a Name of Action Name of Lead Agency. Print or Type Name of Responsible Of ficer in Lead Al;ency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Luad At:ency Signature of l'reparer(If different from responsibleoifice Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared 'by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significar on the environment. Please complete .the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be cor -as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any ad .informa.tion you believe will be needed to complete Parts2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available.and will not new studies, research or investigation. If information requir•ing.sui ch additional work is unavailable, so indicate and each instance. NAME OF ACTION Proposed NeXtel Communications Public Utility Communications Facility NY2812 Peconic North LOCATION OF ACTION(include street Address, Municipal;ty and County) :; 21855 Count • Road 48 Cutcho ue Suffolk NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE . Nextel of New York Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications (516 )229-3936 ADDRESS One South Street CITYlPO STATE ZIP CODI Garden City NY 111530 NAME OF OWNER(11 different) I BUSINESS TELEPHONE Arthur V Junge t631 ) 477-3655 ADDRESS PO. Box 299 CITYJPO STATE LP CODI Orient I NY 111957-02 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION See Attachment Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site.Description ' Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land-use: OUrban Olndustrial ®Commercial L.Residential (suburban) .' :ORural (no ❑Forest . ❑Agriculture OOther 2. Total �of project area: .200± sq. ft. Represents area to be leased only. APPROXIMATE.ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLEI Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres ; Forested acres ; Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc,) acres ; Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECI.) acres Water Surface Area acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 200± sq. ft. g Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres 200± sq. ft. Other (Indicate type) acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Ha-4 Haven Loam, 0-'2 percent .slope a. Soil drainage: OWell drained 100 0% of site ❑Moderately well draineil °b of sit( ❑poorlN. draint,d of situ b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many a(J(15 of soil are classified'within soil (Troup 1.1hryugh •t. of.• Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). a• Are there bedrock.outcroppings on project sil(,? ❑Yes kNo �. What is depth to bedrock? 955± (in feet) 2 " 5. Approximate percent gc' 0,"proposed project%ite with slope%: NU-10% _l U °o ❑'Il)-]5°'° ❑15°/o or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous' to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State ,or the Na Registers of Historic Places? ' OYes MNo :..; 7.-Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? s OYes 8. What is the depth of the water table? 50± (in feet) 9. Is site located over a'primary, principal, or sole source aquifer?. ®Yes ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? OYes ®No • 11. Does• project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened, or endang OYes ®No According to. Preliminary site inspection Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological forma OYes ®No Describe . 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation OYes 121\10 ' If yes, explain . 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be importan't to the community? OYes ONO 15. Streams within or.contiguous to project area: None a. Name or Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, g p 1 ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project'area: .>.:i.. . a. Name None b. Size. (In acres) 17'. Is•the .site served by existing public utilities? MYes ONO a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? IJYes ONo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes ❑No 0n—site -co nne'ction'- 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and ,~Markets Law, Article 2! Section 303 and 304?' . Dyes ®No , 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Artic of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? OYes ONO 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastbs? Oyes ®No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 acres. b. Project M NN to lbe'developed: 200 ± sq.f inilirrll 200±�sq.ft. �. y; xmm ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A . (If appropriate) ; e. If the project is an expansion, indicate pert ont of expansion proposed N/A I. Numhr.r of off-street parking spaces existing; 0 ; .proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated permo r h 1* *one per mont (upon c.omplcliort of project)? to check h. If residential: Number and tyPe of Irnlrsing units: equipment One family Two Family Multiple I•arnily Condominium Initially Ultimately _ i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest propnsvd structure ** height: width: length. i. Linear feet of frontage along; a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?' N/A It See Attachment 3 2. 'How much natural n'•, � el (i.e..' ruck, earnh etc.� ) will bt: removr:u from the seta? 0 tons/cubic y 3. ,Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ONo MNIA a. If yes, for whit intend_-' purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes . ONo c. Will upper seibsoil.be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ' ONo 4. How.many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres 5.. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project OYes ONo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 1 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).' b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month ' year, (including demolii .c: Approximate completion date of final phase month year. :. .. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes -ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes ®No i. 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction, 3± ; after project is complete .0_ 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or Facilities? OYes . MNo If yes,-explain 12. Is surface liquid waste,disposal involved? OYes ®No (unmanned facility) a. If yes, indicate .type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid.waste disposal involved? OYes ®No Type (unmanned facility) 14. Will surface area of an existing.water body increase or decrease by proposal? OYes ®No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project, located in'a 100 year flood plain? OYes MNo . ? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes ®No: (unmanned, facility) a. If yes, what is .the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ONo C. If yes, give .name locatibn d. Will any wastes not go. into a sewage disposal system .or into a sanitary landfill? .OYes. ONo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? I]Ye:s MNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tonslmorith. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides?" OYes R]No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than ono hour Iwr day)? OYes PNo .20. Will project produce operating; noise exceeding the local ;imbient. noise levels? ❑Yes MNo . 21. Will project result in an increase in orwrgy us(!? OYes ❑Nei If yes , indicate type(s) minimal increase in electricity 22. If water supply is from w,al;, indicates pumping eapocity NSA gallun5/mint 23. Total anticipated water usage: per day 0 g;alluntilday. (unmanned facility) 24. Does project involve Local. State or N-deral funding? Oyes IMNc, If Yes, explain 4 j •25. Approvals required: < ... ' Submit Type Date City, Town, Village Board Oyes ®No City, Town, Village Planning Board WYes ❑No Site Plan Approval -City, Town Zoning Board `O-Yes ❑No City, County Health Department Dyes ®No Other Local.Agencies ❑Yes MNo Other Regional Agencies Dyes ®No State Agencies Dyes ®No Federal Agencies OYes MNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning.or zoning decision? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision ®site plan ❑new/revision of master plan Oresource management plan Oother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Light Industry 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Site is developed 4- What is the proposed zoning of the site? no change proposed S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as,permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plant?:.: KlYes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/,, mile radius of proposed action?.: Agricultural, Municipal (Coll.ection Center) Commercial,Residential/A-C, L1, L10i.` 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? ®Yes 9. If the proposed .actioh is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A . a. What is the minimum. lot size proposed? 10, Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of'9eccver or water districts? Dyes 11 . Will the proposed action .create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, pc fire protection)? Dyes MNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Oyes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Oyes 1 t a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic?. Dyes ONo D: Informational Details Attach any additional information as may bc: needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any ad impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss'suc:h impacts antl the measures which you propose to mitiga avoid them. E. Verification 1 certify that the information provided ahov(• is true: to th<i hest of my knowledge. Nextel ommunications by 'reudenthal Applicant/Sponsor atne i Grou Inc. Dale Ju1y 6, 2001 Signature Title Project: Manager G}.n atr—a—IT If file action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a stale agency' c6111plele the Coastal Assessment Form before procet with this assessment 5 1 , PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� ��j Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman y1 P.O. Box 1179 G WILLIAM J.CREMERS vz Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone(631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax(63.1) 765-3136 A RICHARD CAGGINO y�Q4 �aO� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Jamie Richter, Town Engineer FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer . RE: NEXTEL Communications Route 48, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 DATE: October 11, 2001 Please review the above for drainage. The"building"is an equipment Shelter, and may not need a dry well. l Nextel of New York,Inc., d/b/a Nextel Communications Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility, Site-NY2812 Peconic North 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue Town of Southold Environmental Assessment Form(EAF) Attachment Description of Action The proposed action consists of the addition of 12(twelve)communications antennas to the existing 105�:foot above grade level(agl) monopole. In addition, an equipment shelter will be constructed within a fenced area adjacent to the existing equipment compound to house the associated communications equipment. The equipment will be attached to the antennas via elevated cable support. B.Li Dimensions of largest proposed structure The Nextel pre-fabricated equipment'shelter measures 10 feet wide by 20 feet long.The shelter will extend to a height of 11 feet 2 inches agl. The antennas will.be attached to the existing 105E foot monopole at a height of 84f feet agl, extending to 82±feet agl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o�OS3FFOI/( BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Town Hall,53095 State Route 25 _.� Gy Chairman P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS, y Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. �ifit, O�� Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Michael Verity, Principle Building Inspector FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer A RE: NEXTEL Communications Route 48, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 DATE: October 11, 2001 Please review the attached for certification. SITE NAME: DATE ORDERED: SITE #: PROJECT MANAGER DATE NEEDED BY: EXTERIOR FINISH: MODEL:OTHER MANUFACTURER:KULLMAN SPECIAL DETAILS: I, ;1I! _II li �II i I:_ '�I �ry ! � �I 1 I Ia it o DM0 YU L � ❑ D220P1 1 t 1 R I' I.-I' I.' �I �� r? ; �� I II ,I I � ?;t I i 1 I I � I � llll '� t� • ; :�, Z J ❑ DMOP2it , ❑ DE20Al2 FW liI ❑ EllI I; I � ti II 1 I �1�� t i• 1 �11 ❑ D 20A3 G3 ❑ 1)EZOP3 �3 Nextel of New York, Inc., d/b/a Nextel Communications Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility, Site-NY2812 Peconic North 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue Town of Southold Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Attachment Description of Action The proposed action consists of the addition of 12(twelve)communications antennas to the existing 105±foot above grade level(agl) monopole. In addition, an equipment shelter will be constructed within a fenced area adjacent to the existing equipment compound to house the associated communications equipment. The equipment will be attached to the antennas via elevated cable support. B.11 Dimensions of largest proposed structure The Nextel pre-fabricated equipment shelter measures 10 feet wide by 20 feet long.The shelter will extend to a height of 11 feet 2 inches agl. The antennas will.be attached to the existing 105E foot monopole at a height of 80f feet agl, extending to 82=L feet agl. SITE NAME: DATE ORDERED: SITE #: PROJECT MANAGER DATE NEEDED BY: EXTERIOR FINISH. MODEL:OTHER MANUFACTURER:KULLMAN SPECIAL DETAILS: - = r L__J � ;EI II l 1 �- ti '�" 1:t ❑ Dmo L /. ❑ DoPl f rLil I I� i , (-- 3 if -- -----gj I ❑ D EZ 0 t12 ►� � -- t�:....;. �J I II: i I t_ 11 A ❑ DE2OA3 �3 . ❑ DEZ0P3 veONLEY,MEADE,NIELSEN & RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2L��► 36 North New York Avenue Huntington,New York 11743 12- (631)425-4100 Telecopier (631)425-4104 October 5,2001 Via UPS Planning Board Office Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 RE: Nextel of New York,Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications SCTM# 1000: Section: 96,Block: 1, Lot: 19.1 Premises: 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue,New York 11935 Dear Sir/Madam: We are attorneys for Nextel of New York,Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications. Enclosed is our application to affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to an existing monopole on the premises and install a related equipment shelter. We were previously advised by Chief Building Inspector Ed Forrester that an application to the Zoning Board of Appeals was not required, only an application for approval to amend the existing Site Plan. Accordingly,we enclose herewith: 1. Application for consideration of a Site Plan. 2. Duly executed Transactional Disclosure Affidavit 3. Letter of Authorization of Owner 4. Ten(10)copies of site plan and elevation drawings 5. Check payable to the Town of Southold in the amount of$217.50 6. Drawings depicting the cabinets and antennas to be used. 7. Full Environmental Assessment Form together with visual Addendum. 8. Existing Wireless Facility Plan Kindly schedule the application for a hearing on the earliest date possible and notify the undersigned of the date assigned. Thank you. Very truly yours, lip; MUNLEY,MEADE,NIELSEN RE +' By: . ac ueline Caputi OCT 09 44"11 JC:bl So11ihox Enclosures . Bell Labs Lucent Technologies Innovations for Lucent Technologies 0, An Analysis of the Radiofrequency Environment in the Vicinity of a Proposed Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio Base Station Site NY-2812 (Peconic North): 21855 Country Road, Cutchogue, New York 'Prepared by the Wireless & Optical Technologies Safety Department Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974-0636 •. , ,.,; _ _III-,.�;1 Prepared for JAN 15 2002 John McAuliffe Nextel Communications rid One N. Broadway, 2°d Floor Planning Sdard White Plains, New York 10601 January 7, 2002 ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue,NY-2 Table of Contents Summary.........................................................................................................................................3 1.Introduction................................................................................................................................4 2.Technical Data............................................................................................................................4 3.Environmental Levels of RF Energy........................................................................................4 4. Comparison of Environmental Levels with RF Standards....................................................5 5.Discussion of Safety Criteria.....................................................................................................5 6.For Further Information...........................................................................................................7 7. Conclusion...................................................................................................................................8 8.References...................................................................................................................................9 ESMR Site NY-2812:Cutchogue,NY-3 An Analysis of the Radiofrequency Environment in the Vicinity of a Proposed Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio Base Station Site NY-2812(Peconic North): 21855 Country Road, Cutchogue,New York Summary This report is an analysis of the radiofrequency (RF) environment surrounding the Nextel Communications enhanced specialized mobile radio (ESMR) base-station antennas proposed for installation in Cutchogue, NY. The analysis includes contributions from the co-located Verizon cellular radio antennas. Engineering data provided by Nextel together with well-established analytical techniques were used for calculating the RF fields associated with ESMR and cellular radio antennas. Worst-case assumptions were used to ensure safe-side estimates, i.e., the actual values will be significantly lower than the corresponding analytical values. The maximum level of RF energy associated with each transmitting antenna was compared with the appropriate frequency-dependent exposure limit, and these individual comparisons were combined to ensure that the cumulative RF environment is in compliance with safety guidelines. The results of this analysis indicate that the maximum level of RF energy to which the public may be exposed is below all applicable health and safety limits. Specifically, in all normally accessible areas surrounding the installation, the maximum level of RF energy associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of all transmitters will be less than 1.0% of the safety criteria adopted by the Federal Communications Commission as mandated by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of personal wireless facilities. The maximum level of RF energy will also be less than 1.0% of the exposure limits of ANSI, IEEE, NCRP, the limits used by the State of New York Department of Health and the limits used by all states that regulate RF exposure. ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue,NY-4 1. Introduction This report was prepared in response to a request from Nextel Communications for an analysis of the radiofrequency (RF) environment associated with the proposed enhanced specialized mobile radio (ESMR) facility, and an opinion regarding the concern for public health associated with long-term exposure in this environment. The analysis includes the contribution from the Verizon cellular radio facility co-located at this site. The Telecommunications Act of 1996[1] is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of wireless facilities. With respect to personal communication services, e.g., ESMR, Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 states the following: "No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such emissions." Therefore, the purpose of this report is to ensure that the RF environment associated with this facility complies with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) guidelines as required by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which is also the same as the safety criteria used by the State of New York Department of Health (NYS DOH). 2. Technical Data The proposed ESMR and co-located cellular radio antennas are to be mounted on a monopole located at 21855 Country Road in Cutchogue, NY. The ESMR and cellular radio antennas transmit at frequencies between 869 and 894 million hertz (MHz). (These frequencies were formerly allocated for UHF television channels 77 through 79). The actual RF power propagated from ESMR and cellular radio antennas is usually less than 10 watts per transmitter (channel) and the actual total RF power is usually less than 200 watts per sector (assuming the maximum number of transmitters are installed and operate simultaneously and continuously, which is rarely, if ever, the case). These are extremely low power systems when compared with other familiar radio systems, such as AM, FM, and television broadcast, which operate upwards of 50,000 watts. The attached figure, which depicts the electromagnetic spectrum, lists familiar uses of RF energy. Table 1 lists engineering specifications for the proposed system. 3. Environmental Levels of RF Energy The antennas used for ESMR and cellular radio systems propagate most of the RF energy in a relatively narrow beam (in the vertical plane) directed toward the horizon. The small amount of energy that is directed along radials below the main beam directly under the antennas is not remarkably different from the environment in the main beam at points more distant. The methodology used to calculate the exposure levels follows that outlined in FCC OET Bulletin No. 65'. For the case at hand, the maximal potential exposure levels associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of Nextel's transmitters can be readily calculated at any 1.OET Bulletin 65,Edition 97-01,August 1997. Federal Communications Commission,Office of Engineering and Technology,Washington,DC ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue,NY-5 point in a plane at any height above grade. Based on the information shown in Table 1, the maximum power density that could exist in an accessible area is at a height of 16 ft above grade. This would be representative of the maximum power density immediately outside the upper floor of nearby private homes (assuming level terrain). The maximum power densities associated with the proposed and existing antennas are listed in Tables 2. The levels are also shown in Table 2 expressed as a percentage of the FCC's maximum permissible exposure (MPE) values found in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (specifically, in the FCC Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation [2]). The above values are the theoretical maxima that could occur and are not typical values. For example,the calculations include the effect of 100%field reinforcement from in-phase reflections and the assumption that each transmitter operates continuously at maximum power. Experience has shown that the analytical technique used is extremely conservative. That is, actual (measured) power density levels have always been found to be smaller than the corresponding calculated levels even when extrapolated to maximum use conditions (all transmitters operating simultaneously) [3]. Also, levels inside nearby homes and buildings will be lower than those immediately outside because of the high attenuation of common building materials at these frequencies and,hence, will not be significantly different from typical ambient levels. 4. Comparison of Environmental Levels with RF Safety Criteria Table 2 shows the calculated maximal RF power density levels in the vicinity of the proposed installation; Table 3 shows federal, state and consensus exposure limits for human exposure to RF energy at the frequencies of interest. Because the MPEs vary with frequency, the calculated RF levels must first be weighted with frequency (the percentages are shown in Table 2) and then combined before comparing with the safety guidelines. With respect to FCC limits for public exposure, comparisons of the combined weighted analytical results indicate that the maximal level associated with the proposed antennas is at least 100 times below the MPE. 5. Discussion of Safety Criteria Publicity given to speculation about possible associations between health effects and exposure to magnetic fields from electric-power distribution lines, electric shavers and from the use of hand- held cellular telephones has heightened concern among some members of the public about the possibility that health effects may be associated with any exposure to electromagnetic energy. Many people feel uneasy about new or unfamiliar technology and often want absolute proof that something is safe. Such absolute guarantees are not possible since it is virtually impossible to prove that something does not exist. However, sound judgments can be made as to the safety of a physical agent based on the weight of the pertinent scientific evidence. This is exactly how safety guidelines are developed. The overwhelming weight of scientific evidence unequivocally indicates that biological effects associated with exposure to RF energy are threshold effects, i.e., unless the exposure level is sufficiently high the effect will not occur regardless of exposure duration. (Unlike ionizing radiation, e.g., X-rays and nuclear radiation, repeated exposures to low level RF radiation, or nonionizing radiation, are not cumulative.) Thus, it is relatively straightforward to derive safety limits. By adding safety factors to the threshold level for which the most sensitive effect occurs, conservative exposure guidelines have been developed to ensure safety. At present, there are more than 10,000 reports in the scientific literature which address the subject of RF bioeffects. These reports, most of which describe the results of epidemiology studies, animal and cell-culture studies, have been critically reviewed by leading researchers in the field and all new studies are continuously being reviewed by various groups and organizations whose ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue,NY-6 interest is developing health standards. These include the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, the standards committees sponsored by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the International Radiation Protection Association under the sponsorship of the World Health Organization, and the National Radiological Protection Board of the UK. All of these groups have recently either reaffirmed existing health standards, developed and adopted new health standards, or proposed health standards for exposure to RF energy. For example, in 1986, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) published recommended limits for occupational and public exposure[4]. These recommendations were based on the results of an extensive critical review of the scientific literature by a committee of the leading researchers in the field of bioelectromagnetics. The literature selected included many controversial studies reporting effects at low levels. The results of all studies were weighed, analyzed and a consensus obtained establishing a conservative threshold upon which safety guidelines should be based. This threshold corresponds to the level at which the most sensitive,reproducible effects that could be related to human health were reported in the scientific literature. Safety factors were incorporated to ensure that the resulting guidelines would be at least ten to fifty times lower than the established threshold, even under worst-case exposure conditions.The NCRP recommendations for both continuous occupational and public exposure to RF energy at the frequencies of interest are shown in Table 3. (Table 3 also includes a summary of the corresponding safety criteria recommended by various organizations throughout the world.) In July of 1986, the Environmental Protection Agency published a notice in the Federal Register, calling for public comment on recommended guidance for exposure of the public[5]. Three different limits, ranging from approximately 500 to 5000 µW/cm2 at PCS frequencies and from approximately 275 to 2,750 µW/cm2 at ESMR and cellular radio frequencies, were proposed. In 1987 the EPA abandoned its efforts and failed to adopt official federal exposure guidelines. However, 1993 and 1996 the EPA, in its comments on the FCC's Notice of Proposed Rule Making to adopt safety guidelines[6],recommended adoption of the 1986 NCRP limits[4]. In September 1991, the RF safety standard developed by Subcommittee 4 of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standards Coordinating Committee SCC-28 was approved by the IEEE Standards Board[7]. (Until 1988 IEEE SCC-28 was known as the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C95 Committee—established in 1959). In November 1992, the ANSI Board of Standards Review approved the IEEE standard for use as an American National Standard. The limits of this standard are essentially identical to the 1982 ANSI RFPGs[8] for occupational exposure and are one-fifth of these values for exposure of the general public (uncontrolled environments). Like those of the NCRP, these limits resulted from an extensive critical review of the scientific literature by a large committee of preeminently qualified scientists, most of whom were from academia and from research laboratories of federal public health agencies. The panels of scientists representing International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), [footnote 2], [9] is recognized by the World Health Organization as an appropriate organization for developing guidelines to protect against non-ionizing radiation. ICNIRP and the National Radiological Protection Board in the United Kingdom[10] independently developed and in 1993 published guidelines similar to those of ANSI/IEEE. In 1997, after another critical review of the latest scientific evidence, ICNIRP reaffirmed the limits published in 1993[11]. Also, what was formerly the USSR, which traditionally had the lowest exposure guides, twice has revised upward its limits for public exposure. Thus, there is a ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue,NY-7 converging consensus of the world's scientific community as to what constitutes safe levels of exposure. Finally, in implementing the National Environmental Policy Act regarding potentially hazardous RF radiation from radio services regulated by the FCC, the Commission's Rules require that licensees filing applications after January 1, 19972 ensure that their facilities comply with the 1996 FCC MPE limits outlined in 47 CFR §1.1310[3]3 (which are the same as the 1986 NCRP limits at the frequencies of interest). (Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, no local government may regulate the placement of wireless facilities based on RF emissions to the extent that these emissions comply with the FCC regulations [11.) With respect to the proposed ESMR and co-located cellular radio antennas, be assured that the actual exposure levels in the vicinity of the Cutchogue, NY installation will be below any health standard used anywhere in the world and literally thousands of times below any level reported to be associated with any verifiable functional change in humans or laboratory animals. This holds true even when all transmitters operate simultaneously and continuously at their highest power. Power density levels of this magnitude are not even a subject of speculation with regard to an association with adverse health effects. 6. For Further Information Anyone interested can obtain additional information about the environmental impact of ESMR and cellular radio communications from: Dr. Robert Cleveland,Jr. Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology 445 121h Street SW Washington, DC 20554 (202)418-2422 and William J. Condon, CHP Chief,Bureau of Environmental Radiation Protection State of New York,Department of Health 2 University Place Albany,NY 12203 (518)458-6495 7. Conclusion This report is an analysis of the RF environment surrounding Nextel's ESMR base-station antennas proposed for installation in Cutchogue, NY. The analysis, which includes the contributions from the co-located Verizon cellular radio facility, utilizes engineering data provided by Nextel together with well-established analytical techniques for calculating the RF 2.The FCC extended the transition period to October 15, 1997. Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,ET Docket 93-62,FCC 97-303,adopted August 25,1997. Prior to this date,the FCC required PCs licensees to comply with the 1992 ANSI/IEEE C95.1 limits and all other licensees(since 1987)to comply with the 1982 ANSI C95.1 limits. 3.Although all FCC licensees will be required to comply with 47 CFR§1.1310 limits,the FCC will continue to exclude certain land mobile services from proving compliance with these limits 47 CFR§1.1307. In the past,although licensees had to comply with the 1982 ANSI C95.1 limits,the FCC categorically excluded land mobile services,including paging,cellular,SMR and two-way radio,from hazard analyses because"individually or cumulatively they do not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment"(12]. The FCC pointed out that there was no evidence of excessive exposure to RF radiation during routine normal operation of these radio services. ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue,NY- 8 fields associated with ESMR and cellular radio antennas. Worst-case assumptions were used to ensure safe-side estimates, i.e., the actual values will be significantly lower than the corresponding analytical values. The maximum level of RF energy associated with each transmitting antenna was compared with the appropriate frequency-dependent exposure limit, and these individual comparisons were combined to ensure that the cumulative RF environment is in compliance with safety guidelines. The results of this analysis indicate that the maximum level of RF energy to which the public may be exposed is below all applicable health and safety limits. Specifically, in all normally accessible areas surrounding the installation, the maximum level of RF energy associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of all transmitters will be less than 1.0% of the safety criteria adopted by the FCC as mandated by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of personal wireless facilities. The maximum level of RF energy will also be less than 1.0% of the exposure limits of ANSI, IEEE, NCRP, the limits used by the NYS DOH and the limits used by all states that regulate RF exposure. Enclosure: Figure. Electromagnetic Spectrum ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue,NY-9 8. References [1] Telecommunications Act of 1996,Pub.L.No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). [2] Federal Communication Commission 47 CFR Parts 1, 2, 15, 24 and 97. "Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation" (August 6, 1996) [3] Petersen, R.C., and Testagrossa, P.A., "Radiofrequency Fields Associated with Cellular- Radio Cell-Site Antennas,"Bioelectromagnetics,Vol. 13,No. 6. (1992) [4] Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, NCRP Report No. 86; National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda,MD. (1986) [5] Federal Register, Vol. 51,No. 146,Wednesday, July 30, 1986. [6] Notice of Proposed Rule Making In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, August 13, 1993. ET Docket No. 93-62. (1993) [7] ANSI/IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,Piscataway,NJ. (1992) [8] American National Standard Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 300 kHz to 100 GHz, ANSI C95.1-1982, American National Standards Institute,New York,NY. (1982) [9] Electromagnetic Fields (300 Hz to 300 GHz), Environmental Health Criteria 137, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. (1993) [10] Board Statement on Restrictions on Human Exposure to Static and Time Varying Electromagnetic Fields and Radiation, Documents of the NRPB, Vol. 4, No. 5, National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon,United Kingdom. (1993) [11] "Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz) - ICNIRP Guidelines," Health Physics, Vol. 74, No. 4,pp 494-522. (1998) [12] Action by the Commission February 12, 1987, by Second Report and Order (FCC 87-63), and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking(FCC 87-64). General Docket No. 79-144. ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue,NY- 10 Table 1 Engineering Specifications for the Proposed ESMR&Co-located Cellular Radio Antennas,Cutchogue,NY ESMR Cellular Site Specifications Nextel Verizon maximum ERP per channel t 100 watts 100 watts ......._. ................................................................._ ......................... actualradiated..Power...per channel.......__.........._...................... 5.watts...................... 8 watts........................_. ..................................................... .__..... ..I..........._..__.. .......... ...._.................. ..... actual total radiated power per sector 40 watts 168 watts numbero. _ ........_ ._..._ ._._.._............_......._.._....._................................................._......._..._............_......................................_.._._.......................P.............._.................._............... number of receive(Rx)antennas N/A 3 per sector �............._........... ....................................................................................... ........ . _...... number of Tx/Rx antennas(duplexed)......................................................4...per sector..................._..........._............_N/A.........................._..... .......................................................................... maximum number of transmitters 8 per sector 21 per sector __.._.number.of.sectors configured..........................................................._........_....................................3..._......_.................................. 3 antenna centerline height above Zrade 80 ft 102.5 ft antenna manufacturer Scala Swedcom .............................._...._..._..._...._.............._........................................_......................................................_........................................_....._.................._.........._......................................._...._................__....-................_.... model number AP13-850-065 ALP-E-9011 _.__.-....................................8ain...................................................._..._...- ......................._._.__. 15.15 dBi 13.15 dBi-. ..........................................................tY.Pe....._.................................................._............................................................._............._directional..............._........................_directional.................._. downtilt 00 00 t Effective Radiated Power -ERP is a measure of how well an antenna concentrates RF energy;it is not the actual power radiated from the antenna. To illustrate the difference,compare the brightness of an ordinary 100 watt light bulb with that from a 100 watt spot-light. Even though both are 100 watts,the spot-light appears brighter because it concentrates the light in one direction. In this direction,the spot-light effectively appears to be emitting more than 100 watts. In other directions,there is almost no light emitted by the spot-light and it effectively appears to be much less than 100 watts. Table 2 Calculated Maximal Levels and the Levels as a Percentage of 1996 FCC MPEs*for the Proposed ESMR&Co-located Cellular Radio Antennas,Cutchogue,NY Power Densit.Y._(.µW/cm2)............._._........_......__......_..........._._. % of M__ PEs* Provider—Service 6 ft AMGLt 16 ft AMGLt 6 ft AMGLt ( 16 ft AMGLt a Nextel—ESMR <0.89 <1.19 0.16% 0.22% .................................. Verizon..�_Cellular....................._......._..__._.....---....._...._..--<_.1.52._..._........_............. _<...1.90....................._......_...-- --.._......__...........0.28%......----..........__�-......._..._... 0.34%......._.................. i Total 0.44% 0.56%. * MPE: The FCC limits for maximum permissible exposure(same as 1986 NCRP limits at the frequencies of interest) t AMGL:above mean grade level ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue,NY- 11 Table 3 Summary of International,Federal,State and Consensus Safety Criteria for Exposure to Radiofrequency Energy at Frequencies Used for ESMR,Cellular Radio,and PCS Systems Exposure Power Density( W/cmZ) Organization/Government Agency Population ESMR/Cellular PCs International Safety Criteria/Recommendations International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection(1997) Occ tional 2062 4875 Health Physics,Vol.74,No.4,pp 494-522. (1998)t -- Public 412 975 National Radiological Protection Board(NRPB, 1993) Occupational 5000 10,000 (United Kingdom) Public 2790 10,000 Federal Requirements Federal Communications Commission(47 CFR§1.1310) _Occupational 2750 5000 Public 550 1000 Consensus Standards and Recommendations American National Standards Institute(ANSI C95.1 - 1982) _.-Occupational 2750_ 500.0 ..........-............... Public 2750 5000 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers .Occupational 2750 6500 .............._._._....................._.._......................__.._......-. (ANSMEEE C95.1-1992)4 Public 550 1300 National Council on Radiation Protection&Measurements Occupational 2750 5000 _..._.._...-....___...... ..............----.__..._..._._._._ (NCRP Report 86, 1986) Public 550 1000 State Codes New Jersey(NJAC 7:28-42) Public 2750 5000 Massachusetts(Department of Health 105 CMR 122) Public 550 1000 New York States Public 550 1000 NOTES: 1. Reaffirmed in 1997 and published,with modification in 1998 2. The NRPB guidelines have slightly different frequency ranges for their investigation levels. The values shown are the lowest values for the corresponding frequency range. 3. Incorporating IEEE Standard C95.1-1991 and IEEE Standard C95.1a-1998 4. State of New York Department of Health follows NCRP Report 86. ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM Non-Ionizing Radiation Ionizing Radiation 0- NM7 R AM Radio: 535- 1605 kHz ZZLight CB Radio: 27 MHz Cordless Phones: 49 MHz TV Ch 2-6: 54 - 88 MHz FM Radio: 88- 108 MHz Marine Radio: 160 MHz TV Ch 7-13: 174 -216 MHz TV UHF Ch 14-69: 470- 800 MHz Cellular Radio, Specialized Mobile Radio, Paging: 806- 946 MHz Antitheft devices: 1020 kHz and/or 915 MHz Microwave oven: 915 and 245OMHz Personal Communication Services: 1800 -2200 MHz Intrusion alarms/ door openers: 10.5 GHz Power Microwave radio: 1 - 40 GHz Frequency Satellite Communications: 100 MHz-275 GHz —103 1 1 —106 1 109 _1012 —1 015 018 1 60 Hz 1 kHz 1 MHz 1 GHz Frequency (Hz) u=4o, Lucent jecilm 610gies - Proprietary Use pursuant to Company instructions Planning Board Town of Southold State of New York: County of Suffolk ------------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of Nextel of New York,Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications AFFIDAVIT For Site Plan Approval Premises: 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue New York =^- � i' i !I STATE OF NEW YORK ) JAN 15 2002 ) SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) Southold Town Soufiane Toury,being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer employed by Nextel of New York, Inc., d/b/a Nextel Communications (`Nextel'). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in telephone coverage and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy service deficiencies in telephone coverage. I am fully familiar with Nextel's antenna network in Suffolk County. 2. I submit this affidavit in support of the application of Nextel for Site Plan Approval. 3. Nextel is considered to be a public utility for zoning purposes under the laws of the State of New York and it holds a license from the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to serve the public within the Town of Southold and throughout the New York Metropolitan area. 4. The proposed public utility communication facility will consist of the affixing of twelve (12) telecommunication antennas to an existing monopole and the installation of a related - 1 - L equipment enclosure on the ground adjacent to the monopole at the premises located at 21855 County Road, Cutchogue,New York. 5. Nextel strives to provide reliable service throughout its licensed coverage area. Unfortunately, at present, there is a service gap in Nextel's coverage in Southold making the service in Southold unreliable. 6. In order to understand why this antenna site that is the subject of this application is needed, it is necessary to understand how Nextel's system works from an engineering standpoint. 7. Nextel's wireless communication system is a communications system designed by strategically placing low powered base stations at determined distances apart and at predetermined heights. The frequencies used by the system are generally"line of site". Because of such factors as hills, valleys, trees, buildings, and other physical obstructions and due to the nature of radio waves, each coverage area is irregularly shaped. Therefore, the sites have some overlap to ensure "seamless" coverage. With some overlap and sufficient signal from each base station, the Nextel user can move through the cells and not lose his or her call. The sites are engineered to cover a limited area, so that an antenna facility will cover the area surrounding it but will not interfere with another site operating on the same frequency some distance away. Because neighboring sites operate on a different frequency, they provide a buffer between sites using the same frequency. This concept, known as frequency re-use, ordinarily allows the network to have sufficient capacity to provide reliable,quality service to Nextel's users. 8. In order to eliminate the service deficiency in a particular area, we prepare propagation studies to determine the height and location of the cell site needed. Based on our studies, we determined that an antenna facility at the premises with antennas affixed at 80 feet above ground level would eliminate the service deficiency. 2 - L 9. The antennas in question must be affixed at this location at the specified height of 80 feet above ground level in order to ensure that the service deficiency will be eliminated and that reliable service will be afforded to Nextel users. The need for the site is due to numerous factors; including the topography of the site and the surrounding area and the proximity of neighboring sites.. In addition, the antennas must be mounted above the tree line, in order to ensure that the signal is not obstructed. 10. Nextel proposes to collocate its antennas on a monopole located in a zoning district designated as an industrial district. Its proposed location is well integrated into the overall character of the industrially zoned area. 11. The proposed antenna facility is of vital importance to Nextel's efforts to provide reliable service to Southold.Unless it is established, a significant service deficiency will persist. 12. The antennas proposed will not interfere with radio or television service, or public safety telecommunications in the Southold area. 13. Based on all of the foregoing, this application represents an excellent choice; it will enable Nextel to provide reliable service in Southold and will have minimal visual impact on the surrounding industrial area. T /., SOLTMANE T Y Radio Frequency Engineer Sworn to before me this day of , 2002. Y PUBLIC IACQUELINE CAPUII Notary Public,State of yew YO* No.48MOB:Suffolk Count Commission Exmres AP6120,"3 3 - AFFIDAVIT NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. CELLULAR TELEPHONE SITE 21855 Middle Road (County Rd. 48) Cutchogue, New York 11935 Suffolk County Tax Map #1000-96-1-19.1 DATE OF HEARING r January 14, 2002 ; PREPARED FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PREPARED BY LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. 294 New York Avenue, Suite 2A Huntington, New York 11743 (631)427-1000 AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL J. LYNCH STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS. . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) MICHAEL J. LYNCH, being duly sworn, deposes and says : 1. I am President of Lynch Appraisal Ltd. with offices at 294 New York Avenue, Huntington, New York. I am a certified New York State general real estate appraiser. I have been qualified to testify as an expert witness before the Town of Huntington Zoning Board of Appeals and Town Board, Town of Oyster Bay Board of Zoning Appeals and Town Board, Town of Hempstead Zoning Board of Appeals and Town Board, Town of North Hempstead Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Babylon Zoning Board of Appeals and Town Board, Brookhaven Board of Zoning Appeals, Town of Smithtown Board of • Zoning Appeals and Town Board, Town of Shelter Island Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Islip Planning Board, Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Southampton Planning Board, as well as numerous incorporated villages throughout Nassau and Suffolk Counties . 2 . At the request of NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ( 'Nextel' ) I have inspected the proposed site that is the subject of this application. I am fully familiar with the site, the neighborhood in which it lies, and I am fully familiar with what is proposed by Nextel . 3 . The proposed Nextel wireless site in the hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, calls for the installation of twelve (12) panel antennas (making up a total of three sectors) , affixed to an existing 105 , monopole. The antennas will be at a height of 80 ' (centerline) . There will also be associated equipment cabinetry on a concrete pad near the base of the tower. Nextel' s site will join an existing wireless site by Verizon Wireless, 1 whose antennas are situated at the top of the tower. The Nextel site will be at the north-westerly corner of an auto repair site situated along the northerly side of Middle Road (County Road 48) , 750 ' westerly of Cox' s Lane. It contains a total site area of 1 . 05 acres and is situated within a 'ILI" Light Industrial zoning district . Adjoining properties include a Town of Southold recycling center to the north, vacant land to the east, and a single-family dwelling to the west, all zoned Light Industrial (LI) . Across Middle Road to the south is vacant land. zoned Agricultural Conservation (A-C) . Nearby properties include a multi-tenanted industrial center, and vacant industrial and agricultural land. Accordingly, it is my professional opinion that the proposed site will not negatively affect property values in the surrounding area, and will not have an adverse effect on the character of the neighborhood or the pattern of its development. The property values, neighborhood character and pattern of development have already been well established by the existing conditions, uses and zoning within the area. This includes the existing monopole and telecommunications equipment already in place on the subject property. 4 . In addition, my opinion is supported by studies we have conducted regarding other wireless facilities . We have studied the effects of the installation of wireless telecommunication sites at Arlington Avenue, Franklin Square, New York, and May Place, Massapequa Park, New York. We have studied the effects of an existing 300 ' lattice tower on new luxury housing homes at Southwoods Road, Woodbury, New York. And we have the studied the effects of a rooftop wireless site at Glen Cove Road, East Hills, New York. In addition, we have consulted with a New Jersey real estate appraiser who studied the effects on property values of numerous wireless telephone sites in the state of New Jersey, and with an appraiser who studied value patterns surrounding free- standing monopoles with antennas affixed at two Long Island sites . These studies are summarized on the following pages : A. Water Tower Site, Arlington Avenue Franklin Square, Nassau County, New York. Wireless antennas went on-line affixed to this water tower site on January 1998 . This tower is situated in a stable residential neighborhood comprised of a relatively modest and homogenous group of single-family dwellings . Our staff compared sales data (price per square foot) of homes in the immediate area (up to 3 blocks away) before and after the on- line date of the antennas . Our "before" data, which included eight (8) sales running from 11/95 to 10/97, was compared with "after" data, which included six (6) sales running from 3/98 to 7/00 . The average price per square foot of the homes in the before and after groups was 21% higher for the latter, but statistically similar after adjusting for market appreciation. This leads the appraiser to conclude that the antennas did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values . B. Water Tower Site, May Place, Massapequa Park, Nassau County, New York. Wireless antennas went on-line affixed to this water tower site on October 1, 1992 . This tower is also situated in a stable residential neighborhood comprised of a relatively modest and homogenous group of single-family dwellings . Our staff compared sales data (price per square foot) of homes in the immediate area (up to 1/3± mile away) before and after the on-line date of the antennae. Our "before" data, which included thirteen (13 ) sales running from 3/90 to 10/92, was compared with "after" data, which included fifteen (15) sales running from 12/92 to 10/94 . The sales data for these two groups was inconclusive in that the price per square foot in the "after" situation was actually higher than the "before" situation. The market for homes during this time period was relatively stable. C. 300 ' Lattice Tower, Southwoods Road, Woodbury, Nassau County, New York. An existing 300' telecommunications tower sits along the west side of Southwoods Road, opposite Shannon Drive. Across the street from this tower is a series of housing developments of luxury homes that were built from 1994 to 1999 . Many of the homes in these developments are within clear sight of the tower. In addition to researching overall sales in the Woodbury-Syosset area, we included looking at other home sales within the same developments that were not within direct sight of the tower, but otherwise similar to the affected homes . Our research indicates that the selling prices of the affected homes far exceeds the average selling prices of homes in the Woodbury-Syosset area, based on Multiple Listing sales data. Furthermore, the selling prices for the affected homes was similar to that of homes within the same developments that were not within direct sight of the tower. The following data reflects sales of homes along those streets within view of the tower, and average sales prices in the Woodbury-Syosset area: PRICE RANGE OF HOMES (FROM 1994-1997) ALONG SHANNON DRIVE, PIRONI COURT, AND CHAUNCEY PLACE: $500,000 - $747,000; AVERAGE $626,000 AVERAGE 1997 SALE PRICE IN WOODBURY BASED ON MLS DATA: $491,565 AVERAGE 1996 SALE PRICE IN WOODBURY BASED ON MLS DATA: $434,647 AVERAGE 1997 SALE PRICE IN SYOSSET BASED ON MLS DATA: $402, 878 AVERAGE 1996 SALE PRICE IN SYOSSET BASED ON MLS DATA: $357,172 Our research has concluded that the presence of this tower has not had a negative effect on real estate values for those homes that are within sight of the tower. D. Rooftop Antennas, 70 Glen Cove Road, East Hills, Nassau County, New York. Wireless antennas were affixed to the rooftop of this 3-story office building in late 1997 . This building is bordered to east, north/east and south/east by a relatively homogenous group of mid-priced single family dwellings, sharing similar appeal and utility. These include Colonial, Cape and Split-level styles, and are situated within the Red Ground Civic Association. Our staff compared sales data of homes in the immediate area (up to 3 blocks away) before and after the on-line date of . the antennas . Our "before" data, which included eight (8) sales running from 10/94 to 4/97, was compared with "after" data, which included twelve (12) sales running from 1/98 to 8/00 . The average price per home in the before and after groups was 20% higher for the latter, but statistically similar after adjusting for market appreciation. This leads the appraiser to conclude that the antennas did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values . E. Twin Guyed Microwave Towers, Randolph, New Jersey. A regression analysis was completed during 1995 by Mr. Thomas P. Welsh ( 'Welsh' ) , a New Jersey real estate appraiser who is a partner in the firm, KRAUSER, WELSH & CIRZ, Inc . , 161 Madison Ave. , Morristown, NJ. He studied luxury homes sales in the immediate and general vicinity of twin guyed microwave towers (erected circa 1960s, later fitted with wireless antennas) in Randolph, NJ. Using sales price per square foot as his dependent variable, Welsh utilized a sample size of 204 homes sales within the past 15 years that were within various distances (to a maximum of approx. 1/4 mile radius) to the towers . His regression analysis showed no significant evidence that distance of the homes relative to the towers showed any effect on the sales price per square foot of said homes . In other words, the presence of microwave/wireless towers in this particular neighborhood, using sales data collected from the past 15 years, had no significant effect on property values . Furthermore, Mr. Welsh indicated to our firm that he has researched this topic and related matters extensively, and that he does not know of one study which has proved that the presence of microwave/wireless towers or antennas in a particular neighborhood results in a diminution of surrounding property values . F. Monopole Antenna Sites, Port Washington and Shoreham, Long Island, NY. John Breslin, a licensed New York State general real estate appraiser with offices in Huntington, New York, has conducted similar studies that concur with our findings . Mr. Breslin studied properties abutting free-standing monopoles in the hamlets of Port Washington and Shoreham. His firm researched sales both before and after the erection of the structures . At each site there was no significant change in property values due to the erection of the monopoles . The time period for these studies, he noted, was between 1992-1995 , a period when property values in those hamlets was relatively stable. Both of the sites and data analyzed by Mr. Breslin was personally inspected and reviewed by our company, and found to be valid. 5 . In summary, we found no correlation between the presence of wireless telecommunication antennas and declining property values in the four Long Island residential communities we studied. Our findings corroborate those of both Mr. Thomas Welsh, the New Jersey appraiser who undertook a similar study with respect to wireless sites in New Jersey, and with John Breslin, the Huntington, New York appraiser who studied value patterns of properties surrounding monopoles on Long Island. MICHAEL LkNCH Sworn to before me this day of January 2002 . 1�-- A Y PUBLIC JACQUELINE CAPUTI perry Public State of New York No. 89UTO% Suffolk Coua Commission Expires April 20,2—3 ADDENDA VIEW OF PROPERTY WITH EXISTING MONOPOLE IN BACKROUND �•, CLOSE-UP OF EXISTING MONOPOLE AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT r r Yyy r S � i r! �- ...._�+�rq�e•`_ aKwwF � tea. - .. 0 �t PLANNING, ZONING AND VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS PROPOSED NEXTEL PUBLIC UTILITY COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY 21855 COUNTY ROAD 48 HAMLET OF CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK . Prepared for: Nextel Communications One South Street Garden City, New York 11530 207 VG Prepared by: Freudenthal& Elkowitz Consulting Group,Inc. 368 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack,New York 11725 (631) 499-2222 January 2002 Table of Contents Page Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . 1 Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility and Site Conditions . . 3 Zoning, Land Use and Environmental Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Visual Impact Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Findings and Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14, Figure 1 . - Site Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Figure 2 - Site Plan, Elevations, Plans and General Notes . . . . . . . . . 4 Figure 3 - Zoning Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Figure 4 - Nextel Search Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Figure 5 - Photograph Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . .-- . . . . . . . . . .11 Appendix A - Photographs of Subject Site and Surrounding Area Appendix B - CAM Consulting Group, Inc. Letter of Methodology,View Point Photographs and Photographic Simulations Appendix C - Curriculum Vitae of Theresa Elkowitz,Principal of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. INTRODUCTION A planning,zoning and visual impact analysis was performed for the proposed Nextel ofNew York, d/b/a Nextel Communications (Nextel)public utility communications facility consisting of twelve panel antennas to be mounted to an existing 105 foot 8± inch monopole with the associated equipment shelter to be located in an existing fenced communications compound containing the associated equipment of another carrier. The subject site is located at 21855 County Road 48, Hamlet of Cutchogue,Town of Southold,Suffolk County,(see FJZure 1 - Site Location Map). The site was examined as to visual resources, environmental conditions and surrounding land use and zoning. A site and area inspection as well as review of aerial photography were undertaken to examine.land use on the site and in the,surrounding community. In addition, the Town of Southold zoning map was consulted to determine the zoning of the site and surrounding area. The aesthetic conditions were evaluated through visual inspection of the proposed public utility communications facility location, evaluation of physical characteristics of the proposed facility and visual inspection of proximate areas to determine existing characteristics of and obstructions in the horizon. In order to conduct the visual analysis, the following methodology was employed: • Visual inspection of the existing public utility communications facility location and evaluation of physical characteristics of the proposed co-location; • Visual inspection of proximate areas to determine existing characteristics of and obstructions in the horizon; and • Photographic simulation analysis of the proposed public utility communications facility from several identified vantage points, conducted by CAM Consulting Services, Inc. 1 . tl Figure 1 - Site Location Map _ \\� SITE LOCATION Mag 16.00 I Wed Nov 21 15:39 2001 Local Road Scale 1:7,812 al center)) Primary State Route 500 Feet Railroad 200 Meters Population Center Land Water Woodland Source: 1996 DeLorme Street Atlas USA FREUDENTHAL &ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Figure 1 2 PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND SITE CONDITIONS The proposed Nextel Communications installation is to co-locate within an existing public utility communications facility situated at 21855 County Road 48, Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County. The property is designated on the Suffolk County tax maps as Section 096 -Block 1 - Lot 19.1 and is improved with an existing building, asphalt pavement,parking lot and 105 foot 8f inch monopole with antennas of one other communications carrier(the center-line of which extends to 102.5t feet above grade level (agl). There is an existing equipment shelter which extends to a height of 11 feet 2f inches agl. The proposed pr6j ect consists of the attachment ofthree sectors ofNextel Communications antennas (four antennas each)to the existing monopole(see Figure 2-Site Plan,Elevations,Plans and General Notes) the center-line of which will be at 80f feet agl, lower than the existing antennas. The associated prefabricated equipment shelter will be 10±feet by 20±feet by 11 feet 2±inches high and will be located within the communications compound. The existing fence around the compound will be moved to allow for the installation of the Nextel Communications equipment shelter. 3 EXISTING EQUIPMENT TO REMAIN. p EXISTING FENCED COMPOUND ANTENNA NOTES THREE SECTORS (30, 150'.270') Q- SECTORS- ( �) 1p• �� ECTOR-1/11/4 DIA.ACABLEL ENCTHS '125- 225• COX LANE (BEYOND) EXISTING MONOPOLE �' TO REMAIN Q 5� SECTORS-1 7(B'CIA CABLE(LENGTHS > 225') ) EXISTING EQUIPMENT EXISTING 6'-0'HIGH NEW ENCLOSURE FOR NEXTEL GPS/BMR-1/2 DIA. CABLE (ALL LENGTHS < 167') ENCLOSURE TO REMAIN FOR MORE. SEE DETAIL 2/A-2 SECTOR ANT. TYPE DEGREES COLOR CODECABLE LENGTH FENCE WITH 12'-0" NEW NEXTEL SECTOR // \ \ FDR MORE INFORMATION. ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO // •��\\ A 1 AP13.850.065 4D' GREEN 135 WIDE DOUBLE GATE / '.'. - TO REMAIN. EXISTING MONOPOLE // _ �� A 2 AP1J.B50.065 40' WHITE 139' AREA OF WORK.SEE ENLARGED A 3 AP13.850.065 40' BLUE 143'- Z /� / •::•; + \ PLAN ON THIS SHEET FOR A 4 AP13.850.065 40' RED 147' O /+ MORE INFORMATION. LLrLLII \ B 1 AP73.850.065 130' DOUBLE GREEN 135 C' / // - B 2 AP13.B50.065 130' DOUBLE WHITE 1359 41'-T p / •„ - EXISTING TREE LINE (TYP.) m B 3 AP73.550.065 730' DOUBLE BLUE 14J' EXISTING CRUSHED X. X X X v B 4 AP13.B50.065 130' DOUBLE RED 147' STONE SURFACING X. _ ` •t�� / EXISTING BUILDING C 1 AP13.850.065 23D' TRIPLE GREEN 135 EXISTING STORM WATER // 3. ..,• EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING GENERATOR PIPING UNDER GROUND // \ �. C 2 AP13.850,065 2JD' TRIPLE WARE 139' TD REMAIN W I L L I A M R C O L L I N S, A I A (V I F) �� \\� •, DRYWELL C 3 AP13.850.065 230' TRIPLE BLUE 143' - A R C H I T S C T S L L P C 4 AP13.850.065 230' TRIPLE RED 147' ' EXISTING ELEC/TELCO // S \�\�y+ j I' \•CO GPS-1 YELLON' 10 UNDERGROUND // FO>. \^J 1• <, .I' - - GPS-2 - - DOUBLE YELLOW IQ' NEW GPS-2 X PORTION OF m SERVICE. (SEE O,P �/ \, - BMR - - WHITE 30, EXISTING FENCE BFI'1ECHNO 0GY DRIVE WIArlcTrr NY pM DRAWING E-1 FOR j// �O• A ( 1 \ r TO BE REMOVED. VOME v 63L-LBW PAX a 631-�B49 NEW SERVICES). / // �. ZONING DISTRICT:0100 J,g$U11E; N 41' 01' SO" h S t p I//p A A \ j� \ O SECTION.: 048 ON• ID \ ~'^.,, N TAX BLOCK: 1 I W 72 2B 49 NEW POURED CONCRETE •'\ O� X LANDING.SEE DETAILR7, Q // .. TAX LOT: 19.1 c DWG A-2. PROPERTY LINE 1\\ _ \ ,1 0" 20'-0' 2'-B' U \ ` ADDITIONAL ANTENNA NOTES: NEW NEXTEL SECTOR a ,•,-�: NEW FENCE WITH 4'-0' / ! \ \ ANTENNA(S) MOUNTED TO - - - WIDE GATE TO MATCH LLANDSCAPED \ 1.ALL INDICATIONS OF NORTH ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. EXISTING MONOPOLE AT AREA. EXISTING(SEE DETAIL R5 /1 \ '�., CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IN FIELD TRUE NORTH PRIOR 80'-O'LEVEL TO FE. I X DWG.A-2). TO SECTOR ANTENNA INSTALLATION. NEW BMR 2.ALL ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED ON DOWNTILT BRACKETS. FOUNDATION OF EXISTING 3. CABLE LENGTHS LISTED ARE APPROXIMATIONS BASED ON MONOPOLE(V.I.F.) NEW lENCLO X20'RE EQUI ME ENT TEL THESE PLANS AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR EXISTING 105'-B"HIGH o EQUIPMENT. CQST1L7Ati11 ff ORDERING CABLE ALL CABLE LENGTHS MUST BE V.I.F.TAG MONOPOLE TO REMAIN 'x o // f \ BOTH ENDS OF ALL TRANSMISSION UNES W/BRASS TAGS (V.I.F.). o NEW 4'CRUSHED STONE t \ DENOTING COLOR CODE AND SECTOR. I I + FILTER BEDDING OVER MIRASCCAPE /�� 13RIC WITH c o BORDEp. (SEE DETAILWOOD 1 ASPHALT PAVEMENT ! X- X •-.7(' NEW ELEVATED CABLE . SUPPORT. NEW GPS-1 J O=Ol DIES. Na IN18 REVL4Ri 0 1 \\ �`11 NOTES, CPS AND BMR ANTENNA AS INDICATED 3 7 \ r ON NEW SHELTER UTILIZING ANTENNA NOTE: `1 MOUNTING HARDWARE AS RECOMMENDED BY NEW ELECTRIC METER AND A-1 SEE PART SITE PLAN,THIS ` \ MANUFACTURER.COORDINATE WITH NEXTEL RF DISCONNECT SWITCH. SHEET,FOR ANTENNA SECTOR !o \ \ Iv ENGINEER. HEADINGS. NORTH ft 2.ADHERE TO RADIUS AND MANUFACTURERS COM CTURE S RECOMME FOR NDATIONS BENDING CABLE (TYPICAL®ALL ANTENNA CABLE) NORTH 1 PART SITE PLAN 3.RESTORESTALLA ANY AREA WHICH EM WI AFFECTED 2 ENLARGED PLAN INSTALLATION OF ANY REM WITHIN THE SCOPE �� bSI7� �� OF WORK. SCAL.E.1"=20'-O" SCALE:1/8"=1'-0' 6/22/01 FOR FLING L` 105'-8't AGE. - ,6,•-B_AMSL GENERAL NOTES EXISTING ANTENNA � GENERAL SITE NOTES TO REMAIN T.O. EXISTING MONOPOLE � - NEW NEXTEL SECTOR ANTENNAS MOUNTED I. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH TO NEW QUAD-BRACKET STANDOFF T-ARMS 102'-5'f AGL PROVISIONS OF LOCAL, STATE,AND FEDERAL LAWS, IL81T PIANO ORDINANCES,AND REGULATIONS WHEREVER APPLICABLE. 1.ALL SITE WORK TO CONFORM TO THE LATEST TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING J �• MOUNTING FRAME BY VALMONT 161 AMSL BOARD SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS. BRACKMICROETS, OR EQUAL MOUNTING FRAME, �OF EXISTING ANTENNAS F 2. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD TO HAVE VISITED THE •\, BRACKETS,AND HARDWARE U IN SITE AND TO HAVE VERIFIED ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOTIFY THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ENGINEERING DIVISION AT / <: CONFIRMED PF ENGINEER AND PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF BID. LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY ON SITE DRAINAGE,CURB •\' MONOPOLE MAA NUFACTUUFACTU RER. - 3. IN ALL CASES, DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE SCALED FOR OR PAVING WORK, INFORMATION. FIGURED DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS 3.ALL PAVING 70 CONFORM TO TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND NEW YORK STATE DEPT. OF "' \• '\v MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS: EXISTING 105'-B"HIGH 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A. SUB GRADE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO A STABILIZED DEPTH OF 6"AND A.t MONOPOLE TO REMAIN (V.I.F.) g ALL FIELD DIMENSIONS AND JOB CONDITIONS,AND SHALL GRADED AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN. •,,?1 - - 80'-C'AGE NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, B. BASE COURSE SHALL BE 4"CRUSHED STONE BLEND(COMPACTED) z� --- 139'-D"3 AMSL CONFLICTS,AND/OR OMISSIONS WHICH WOULD INTERFERE C.TOP COURSE SHALL BE 2"ASPHALT CONCRETE(COMPACTED)DESIGNATED AS WITH THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE WORK. NEW YORK STATE ASPHALT TYPE"6F'. 7'IE CL OF NEW ANTENNAS SHOULD HE FAIL 70 FOLLOW THIS PROCEDURE AND D.ALL PAVEMENT SHALL BE BUILT ON APPROVED GRANULAR BASE, MINIMUM j• '.'-;' CONTINUE WITH THE WORK, HE SHALL ASSUME ALL 4'-0"DEEP. - RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY ARISING THEREFROM. _ 5. ALL ITEMS OF WORK IDENTIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS BY 4. 'DEWATER'ALL TRENCHES AS REQUIRED DURING INSTALLATION OF ALL FOOTING AND NAME, NOTE,OR MATERIAL DESIGNATION ARE NEW, FOUNDATION TO ENSURE PROPER DEPTH AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF CONCRETE. ��� _ UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LWAS.THE DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH APPROVED WORKING DRAWINGS AND A. DRAWINGSNTNNAAS DEPICT THE INSTALLATION OF NEW 6. ALL NEW MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE IN REQUIREMENT SHEETS. NO DEVIATION WILL BE PERMITTED EXCEPT BY WRITTEN ANTE , MOUNTING FRAMES, NAND HOLES,ETC. ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS LATEST PRINTED APPROVAL OF TOWN SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD. THAT ARE TO BE PLACED ON AN EXISTING AND WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. MONOPOLE STRUCTURE.A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS NEW ANTENNA CABLES TO BE ROUTED SPECIFICATIONS, 6. COMPACTION UNDER STRUCTURES,BUILDING SLABS, STEPS, PAVEMENTS AND WALK SHALL PERFORMED BY OTHERS, PRIOR TO THE TO MONOPOLE WITHIN NEW ELEVATED 7. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAYS SHALL BE 95%" MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY,ASTM D 1557,TESTED IN EACH INSTALLATION OF NEW ANTENNA COMPONENTS, CABLE SUPPORT.SEE DETAIL 3/A-2 BEST STANDARD TRADE PRACTICES. EACH TRADE SHALL COMPACTION LAYER,AT COMPACTION SITE. OR AT LEAST IN EACH IODCU.YDS.OF AEXM REQUIRED TO EVALUATE THE EXISTING MONOPOLELE STRUCTURE ADEQUACY FOR MORE INFORMATION. COOPERATE WITH OTHER TRADES TO FACILITATE JOB MATERIAL VOLUME. COMPACTION UNDER LAWNS OR IN UNPAVED AREAS,85% MAXIMUM NEWLYAPPLIED LOADSOF OF SUPPORT FOR THE THE PROPOSED NEW 10 X 20 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULING AND COMPLETION. DRY DENSITY.ASTM D 1557. COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT. ANALYSIS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY ENCLOSURE NEXTEL EQUIPMENT B. PROPRIETARY NAMES IDENTIFYING ITEMS OF WORK ARE 7,ALL ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. A NEW YORK STATE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL NEW CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH 4'-0' USED TO DESIGNATE THE STANDARD OF CONSTRUCTION. ENGINEER.THE EVALUATION REPORT AND REMEDIAL ITEMS OF EQUAL QUALITY MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR THE PECONIC NORTH WIDE LOCKABLE GATE TO MATCH B.ALL BUILDING OR POLE MOUNTED LIGHTING SHALL BE DIRECTED TO ILLUMINATE DESIGN IF REQUIRED SHALL ES SIGNED AND EXISTING.SEE DETAIL 5/A-2 FOR ARCHITECTS REVIEW. SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SHALL NOT PROJECT UPON ADJOINING ROADS OR NY 28 2 SEALED. OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MORE INFORMATION. 9. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY PROPERTIES. IV i-LU�L MONOVERIFPOLE. STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY OF THE EXISTING DAMAGE TO ADJOINING REMAINING AREAS AS A RESULT OF MONOPOLE. - HIS WORK,AND SHALL REPAIR DAMAGED SURFACES TO THEIR 9. MINIMUM ELEVATION TOP OF NEW STREET CURB SHALL BE SAME AS CENTERUNE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS OR AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO OF STREET OPPOSITE. MINIMUM ELEVATION TOP OF NEW CURBS SHALL BE 6"ABOVE 11'-2"AGL COMPLETE THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF THE WORK. PAVING. COLWYyROAD AB Y EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER 70'- 3 AMSL IQ.ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING WORK SHALL BE PATCHED AND 10. VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN AREAS OF WORK. - CUT Iv TO REMAIN. T.O. NEW CONTIGUOUS SUFINISHED.AS ERFACES�OR NEW MATCH EXISTING (SHOWN. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MEANS OF PROTECTION OF SAID EXISTING UTILITIES AS ENCLOSURE REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW WORK. COORDINATE ALL REQUIRED RELOCATION 11.AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH WORKDAY. EACH TRADE SHALL WORK WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY PROVIDER. / Figure 2 EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE - REMOVAL SHALBE LEBE°DONE IN A DUST INHIBITIVE CLEANING UP THEIR WORK. RUBBISH 11.ALL WASTE MATERIAL INCLUDING RUBBISH,STUMPS, DEBRIS, ETC., SHALL BECOME AND THE JOB SITE SHALL BE FREE OF ALL DEBRIS AND THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. BROOM CLEAN UPON COMPLETION. T SITE PLAN.ELEVATIONS, C fi'-0"AGL 12.CLEAN ALL FLOORS, WALLS, DOORS, MISC.. GLASS, ETC. 12. CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE THE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING 65'-0"f AMSL LEAVING JOB FREE OF DUST AND DEBRIS, PRIOR TO PROJECT CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF REO'D DURING CONSTRUCTION, PLANS AND GENERAL NOTES T.O. NEW FENCE COMPLETION. - SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND 13.EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED.WHICH SEDIMENT CONTROL. LyLM oonmr-.•�yv ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED OR RETAINED BY THE 13. ALL CONCRETE USED FOR ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED 5/22101 OF3976 OWNER.SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR MINIMUM 4.000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. BCA18+ )]AAWAI(i Nqv AND BE REMOVED FROM THE PREMISES. 14.INDICATIONS OF WORK TO BE REMOVED ARE GENERAL ONLY, AS NOTED D'-0".AGL AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL ITEMS WHICH MAY DWAVJN 1TYI REQUIRE REMOVAL SUCH ITEMS SHALL BE REMOVED. _ 59'-O't AMSL _ - - AGA.& CHEC RELOCATED,AND/OR REINSTALLED,AS REQUIRED FOR EXISTING FENCE - NEW FENCE TO MATCH EXISTING GRAD-E INSTALLATION OF NEW WORK. - ®ImPKGA 1 2 WEST ELEVA ION 1OFF F2- Visual Environment of the Site and Surrounding Area The subject site contains a one-story commercial building, paved parking areas, an existing communications compound and a 105 foot 8±inch monopole with associated equipment. The area surrounding the subject site contains predominantly agricultural and residential with a mixture of industrial and commercial (retail businesses and commercial offices) uses. In order_to better depict the nature of the surrounding community,photographs are included in Appendix A. A detailed description of the land use surrounding the site is contained in the section entitled Zoning, Land Use and Environmental Analysis,below. The visual environment of the surrounding area contains obstructions. There are existing utility poles and overhead wires on most surrounding roads, and a public utility communications facility on the subject site. 5 ZONING, LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The site is located in an area zoned Light Industrial (LI) (see Figure 3 -Zoning Map). According to the Town of Southold Zoning Code, this district permits any use in either the Agricultural Conservation (A-C) Zoning or the Light Industrial/Office Park (LIO) and wineries. Such uses include,but are not limited to,wholesale businesses,warehouses and building material storage and sale, cold storage plants,balking and other food processing and packaging plants.' The zoning and land uses of the,surroundirig area are as follows: North: The zoning directly north of the site is Light Industrial and contains a town landfill and an asphalt company, as well as large undeveloped areas.. East: East of the site is a retail area at the intersection of Cox Avenue and County Road 48 which is zoned Agricultural Conservation(A-C). South: .Directly south of the project site, the area is zoned Agricultural Conservation and contains mostly farmland. West: West of the site is zoned Light Industrial/Office Park.(LIO) and contains both farms and undeveloped areas. 6 Zoning Map of the Town of Southold •. N C�a-c Agricultural Conservation Residential Lour Rio Resi Density'AA _ �. -• 1 °` '-��"•`�: - C=� A zt a A so Residential Low Density R-,zo Residential Low Density B ' R zoo Residential Law.Density C a-aoo Residential Low Density D HD Hamlet Density Residential .2 Res /ReidntialRR SITE LOCATION ao' Residential/Office - L=J Limited Business fit, He. Hamlet Business I General Business Marine iM3#+ Marine IIr. + _ eio.. Ught Industrial/Office_..Paris Light Industrial o t:B• _ AHD PA.ffnrda6It Houzir9 Dist. 1- 6 — Town of Southold Zoning Map, 1/10/89 Scale:l"=1600' FREUDENTHAL &ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Figure 3 7 The site is located within an area in which Nextel Communications is experiencing a service deficiency gap(see Figure 4-Nextel Search Area).The search area is that in which the public utility communications facility must be located to address the service deficiency gap being experienced by Nextel. The boundaries of the search area are generally the Long Island Railroad tracks to the south; Mathews Lane to the north;Zacks Lane to the west and east of Bridge Lane,to the east. This search area contains a mix of predominantly agricultural andresidential with some retail and industrial uses. From a planning perspective and given the area in which Nextel must place its public utility communications facility, the site is optimal as Nextel has selected to co-locate on an existing monopole in an area with industrial and commercial uses. Thus,the proposed installation will not necessitate the construction of a new structure, such as a monopole,to accommodate the antennas. Furthermore, the height of monopole need not be extended to accommodate the Nextel antennas. Environmental Considerations Since the facility will be unmanned,there will be minimal impact on the environmental conditions in the area. The facility will not generate either sewage or solid waste and will not need to be supplied with potable water. The equipment installed on the site will use a minimal amount of electricity. There will be no impact on soils or topography as the site is already developed with a public utility communications facility. Since there will be no sewage generation or water use, there will be no impact to surface water or groundwater quantity or quality. The proposed area for the installation of the facility is developed, therefore,there will be no impact to the ecology of the area. Figure 4-Nextel Search Area 8 Search Area Map N •1. - -80 •\ • � l \ A--C - U11 J a 1 i.a A;C s - n H D Source: Nextel Communications; Search Area:/V Town of Southold Zoning Map. Scale: 1"=1,600' (see Figure 3 for zoning legend) FREUDENTHAL &ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Figure 4 9 VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Photographic Simulation Methodology CAM Consulting Group,,Inc. prepared photorealistic renderings of the proposed public utility communications facility. On October 16,2001,CAM Consulting Group,Inc. conducted an on-site visit to obtain familiarity with the site and surrounding area. Analog photographs were taken from each of the View Points examined between12:00 noon and 4:00 p.m. The conditions were mostly sunny. Eight off-site"View Points"proximate to the site were selected for analysis as areas of potential visual impact,four(4)of which were selected for photographic simulation of the completed antenna installation. A Photograph Location Map of the surrounding area is included in Figure 5. As noted, analog photographs were taken from each of the.View Points being examined. The photographs were developed'and scanned into a computer. The images were imported into the Adobe software program.-Files of existing structures were layered onto the photographic image and scaled accordingly. The complete methodology for the photographic simulations is included in Appendix B. 10 21855 County Road, Cutchogue, New York GQ G 'q q chi ,0 0 sG� Cot 1 6� -PCs o� Sly 4' :o 016 Cutchogue Station \� Y �'9 OV \\ ��25 �a ©1999 DeLorme. Street Atlas USA VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS The results of the visual simulation analysis are summarized below with simulations included in Appendix B. View Point 1,From northwest corner of Cox Lane and County Road 48,498E feet from subject site: The existing conditions photograph shows the existing monopole,visible,above the tree line, as well as utility poles and overhead wires, from the Cox Lane Industrial Park. The photographic simulation indicates the proposed Nextel installation would be visible from this vantage point. However,the proposed facility has been designed such that it is similar to the existing antennas and lower on'the monopole. View Point 2,From northwest corner of Church Lane and County Road 48, 1,091t feet from subject site: The existing conditions photograph depicts overhead wires, utility poles, a flagpole and the existing monopole in the horizon. The photographic simulation shows.the proposed Nextel antennas, although visible from this location,would have a minimal,incremental visual impact as they are lower than the existing antennas. View Point 3,From Bidwell Vineyards on County Road 48,2,951-+feet from subject site:View Point 3 was taken from Bidwell'Vineyards. The existing conditions photograph indicates overhead wires and utility poles which help to obscure the view of the existing monopole. The addition of the Nextel antennas would have a negligible impact from this vantage point. View Point 4,From 975 Horseshoe Drive,3,104t feet from subject site: The existing conditions photographic shows the monopole visible in the distance, among overhead wires. As shown in the photographic simulation,the addition of the Nextel antennas would not alter the visual character of the surrounding area. 12 View Point 5,From the intersection of Horseshoe Road and Gold Spur Street,2,632±feet from subject site: Taken from the intersection of Horseshoe Road and Gold Spur Street, the existing conditions photograph illustrates high tension lines and vegetation in a residential area. The existing monopole is not visible from this view point. Thus, a photographic simulation was not prepared as the proposed installation would not be visible. View Point 6,From 10725 Oregon Road,2,696f feet from subject site: The existing conditions photograph depicts a farm with associated equipment and mature vegetation in the distance. A photographic simulation was not prepared as the existing monopole is not visible. As such, the proposed Nextel antennas will not be visible and will have no impact on this area. View Point 7,From northeast corner of Matthews Lane and Cox Lane,714f feet from subject site: The existing conditions photograph shows the mature vegetation that lines Cox Lane. A photographic simulation was not prepared as the existing monopole is not visible from this view point, and as such, the Nextel antennas would not be visible. View Point 8, From the intersection of Tuthill Lane and County Road 48, 1,329-+ feet from subject site: From the intersection of Tuthill Lane and County Road 48, overhead wires, utility poles, existing mature vegetation and a single-family home are visible in the existing conditions photograph. As the proposed Nextel antennas would not be visible from this location,because the existing monopole is not visible, a photographic simulation was not prepared. As the visual analysis indicates,the proposed antennas would be visible from various vantage points. However, given existing obstructions in the horizon including the existing monopole, numerous utility poles, overhead wires and transmission lines, the placement of the Nextel antennas on the existing monopole would have a negligible visual impact. Thus, the proposed public utility communications facility will not alter neighborhood character or the aesthetics of the community. 13 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Based upon an inspection of the proposed public utility communications facility site and surrounding areas, analysis of the surrounding zoning, land use and environmental conditions, evaluation of characteristics of the proposed public utility communications facility installation and analysis of the photographic simulations, the following findings can be made: • The visual environment in the vicinity of the subject site contains obstructions. The existing visual obstructions include the existing monopole, utility poles and overhead wires. • There will be minimal impact on the environmental conditions of the site and the surrounding area since the antennas will be mounted to an existing structure, the associated equipment will be situated within a previously-disturbed,area and the facility will be remotely monitored. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, the federal law that governs wireless communications facilities, encourages co-location. The co-location (in this case placement of communications antennas on an existing monopole),helps to minimize potential cumulative impacts. • From. a planning perspective and given the area in which Nextel must place its facility, the site is optimal as Nextel has selected to co-locate on an existing monopole in an area with industrial and commercial uses. Thus, the proposed installation will not necessitate the construction of a new structure, such as a monopole,to accommodate the antennas. • The photographic simulations indicate that, although visible from certain vantage points,the proposed installation will have a minimal incremental aesthetic impact on the surrounding community as the antennas will be situated lower than the existing antennas on an existing monopole. 14 Given the extent and nature of the service deficiency area and the need for a public utility communications facility therein, Nextel has.selected a location on a structure, with existing antennas, in an area with light industrial and commercial uses. As there are existing visual obstructions in the horizon,the installation will blend with obstructions in the horizon and will be in character with the existing aesthetic character. In conclusion,given the area in which the proposed facility must be located,Nextel has designed the proposed public utility communications facility in a manner that will serve to minimize potential adverse impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Thus,the granting of the application will not result in substantial changes to the physical characteristics of the area nor would it result in significant adverse impacts to neighborhood character, aesthetic quality or the environmental conditions of the community. 15 APPENDIX A FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. f_ Y e, k 'M y' r-FF1 BSI , Photograph No. 1: View of existing monopole from the entrance to the landfill. AL a Photograph No. 2: View of the fenced compound area at the base of the existing monopole. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. / \ / S I Photograph No. 3: View of the Cox Lane Industrial Park, facing northwest at Cox Lane and County Road 48. Note utility pole and overhead wires traversing the area. i i Photograph No. 4: View of surrounding area, facing east on County Road 48,West of the existing monopole. Utility poles and overhead wires are visible along County Road 48. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. APPENDIX B FREUDENTHAL & =OWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Photo Simulation Report Wireless Communication Facility Located at: 21855. County Road Cutchogue, NY Prepared for Nextel Communications Prepared by CAM Consulting Group, Inc. CAM Consulting,Inc. 18 Mansfield Drive Massapequa Park,NY 11762 Office(516) 797-9148 Mobile(516)448-2893 October 18,2001 Town of Southold Chairman and Board Members Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Re: Proposed Nextel Wireless Communication Facility 21855 County Road, Cutchogue,NY Dear Chairman and Board Members: To determine the visual impact of the proposed Nextel facility, CAM Consulting prepared photo- realistic renderings of the proposed public utility communications facility. An onsite visit was conducted to obtain familiarity with the site and surrounding areas. The following is a description of the methods used to prepare the visual analysis study and photo renderings of Nextel's proposed wireless communication facility at 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York. Subject Property Description: 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue,New York 11971 District: 1000 Section: 096 Block: 01 Lot: 19.1 Zoning Classification: L.I.Light Industry Characteristics of Surroundink Area: The subject property is surrounded primarily by commercial, agricultural and industrial zoned properties mixed with residentially zoned properties. Surrounding commercial properties located in the Cox Lane Industrial Park which lies to the east include: Wicks Unlimited,Mattituck Glass &Mirror,Frank's Stairs &Railings,Peconic Telco,Bertsand Plumbing and Heating, Peconic Communications,Hoeys Custom Canvas,Morton Building,Peconic Bay Auto Body and North Fork Imports. Bidwell Vineyards lies to the west. Santorini Restaurant and Catering facility lies approximately 1.5 miles north and is not impacted by the proposed installation. On Site Analysis: CAM Consulting,representatives took photographs and conducted an on-site visual inspection of the existing monopole and surrounding area. The photographs were taken on Tuesday, October 16, 2001 from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Weather conditions were mostly sunny. Nextel proposes to install its antennas on Crown Communication's existing monopole as described in the accompanying drawings presented to the Zoning Board of Appeals.. Eight points of visual impact are described below. In four of the viewpoints,the monopole and antenna panels are visible. The other four viewpoints represent non-impact views where Nextel's proposed installation will not be visible by the human eye. Nextel's proposed 12'x 20' equipment shelter located in the rear yard of the subject property will be completely obstructed from view by the property's main building. Therefore, the equipment shelter will present no visual impact. Following is a description of eight visual analysis viewpoints: Approximate View Point# View Point Location distance from site View Point 1 View from northwest corner of Cox Lane and County ±498 feet Road 48. View Point 2 View from'northwest corner of Church Lane and ± 1091 feet County Road 48. View Point 3 View from Bidwell Vineyards on County Road 48. ±2951 feet View Point 4 View from 975 Horseshoe Road. ±3104 feet View Point 5 View from Horseshoe Road and Gold Spur Street. ±2632 feet Non Impact View.Point 6 View from 10725 Oregon Road. Non Impact ±2696 feet View Point 7 View from Northeast corner of Matthews Lane and ±714 feet Cox Lane. Non Impact View Point 8 View from Tuthill Lane and County Road 48. Non ± 1329 feet Impact Photo-simulation Methodology: Site photographs were taken by a two-man team with a Nikon F5 camera with a fixed 50mm lens, which most closely resembles the view of the human eye. The images were then imported into the Adobe 6.0 software program and images of actual antennas from existing sites were layered on to the existing monopole and scaled to size. The layered images were then filtered using various filters to create the final image, which closely resembles what will actually be seen by the human eye. The image was then printed on Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper providing photo quality simulations of the proposed site. Sincerely, Christine Marino CAM Consulting Group,Inc. _I \ p Fork � TTELCO ]PWCOMC J. P. HUNTER 9 N C ER :® PECONIC SAY' 13 D&D CYCLES ROOFING - SIDING AUTO SOKrr .r,er:..eerss. na INSULATION a FRANKS STARS A R NC.. W MATTffUCK -- e O cs GI A a& MInROR. 'i ■ NOEY'Ssm CUSTOM CAIIVAs. ,u'�jt As�PMpAL . Ilk .L View Point 1 Existing view - from northwest corner of Cox Lane and County Road 48. ! ii•• aa •- -• -: COS .LANE INDUS"�RIAL PARK - 8 14 20SULATUMSM _ .., •� � � lU � In � -- - � �� ;� ! ;'''�''■ PointView t � t f j ;ems,. • —x -OFT WT Op IA pt .41 View Point 2 Existing view - from northwest corner of Church Lane and County Road 48. , t ..s 7f' g FF Alp View Point 2 �f e ,I. si•' •, 1 '^�� L_� tip.. _ �• J IJ _ 1a{r'.��gr `v7' N Y•� 'fi �� .s`u, r . .' '/'. [ ��{,°�.•� � J'S.1 f.Y i+ ;�} 4'tif��✓ 1 ' :.ate �f� _ .Y • �s r .�. s =- 1 i 131DWEU NINnARDS 18 View I yAY �.,vr � • ✓ya r Point ���1.,* .i• •y, ..._it• �... •�,.�i . lM1, i �' 7r _ �:.wry f• - I .� _ �. sI.A4 , '�'. �, �.. •. ,�. `+� ••� tom, Z• ' � 6 ... '�II 1JI Jw PointView View from Horseshoe Road. { J - �a• y� - �.,. +►lh: y*•r. "}+;'.a`7 .n... .. `fir�. ti • Point ti View Point 6 View from 10725 Oregon Road. Non Impact 4` . r p• ► r g f- �,�js. Ste.- ` .r.• � , •r.Fi.,I+' . ' .. - f , vy.'Y - i~� ..w' .• •` 'i Y 4•. �"R 1 ` r/try .. � •�i1•.� �. •�y�•. rp do VII tw ow _ I r •' � •f ' ,•�'��� •-�cl-'�r ..dal' '✓• Iq• .�,�'•..t•• � :�,—._ � � ryi���s• Y�LY, ,tf t�� � ,r .fir• -�y� , w�. .� M4, .�• _ 0.4 lk `Yi•'��_"x • y?*yyye ,�����'`lsffyy__ � �jr' � ♦^"�y };d•�ta,� t0.. � a ._ � .! `y .�� � �^ .1 _�yf _ - 1 '• ♦ ! rhos �f* A'a.y 4-J.4�'1 �'� ,"r5r yT•' s R•;i < a ., �� x� t 4 ifs i/r k' r e � 'q���.t`.S' �-.`r ?(� , ...• .►- ti. s it ilk OL -, '�� •%r !,i 11+a�Z;^r.•;2t'.y 1 i1a.��' .�:j -. +�• ] �'� t +��,•.•�• c<:I�, ��e�.a � _1 �{,.�; � r�3. _1 _ � r ��.n, �/ ram•,. 1, I_�,�a�,� � �\.�t� � •.}I ,+��.. 1._' '1: f.v. -ice �`+ >>'t.'le• w?' ', t ^�4w- _ ��r � ' .�• �wh y1�a•, j -II.'.II'Y�•.'jam>c'�:cyr'�',� �'� � V��^w(}`, _a wtl`� r }��y, � T, 45 If r 4 APPENDIX C FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Theresa Elhonitz, President 368 17eferans i�lemorial glighwap Hugo D. Freuhnfhal (refired-199-1) Commaek, New Fork 11725 Tel: (631) 499-2222 Fax: (63i} �99-5925 CURRICULUM VITAE OF THERESA ELKOWITZ OVERVIEW Theresa Ellcowitz is the president of Freudenthal & Ellkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. (F&E), an environmental and planning consulting firm. She is well-versed in the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) process and has prepared numerous Environmental Assessment Forms (EAFs); Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (DEIS and FEIS);planning and zoning studies, visual assessments;environmental assessments and associated evaluations. Not only has she worked with public and private clients on the administration of the SEQR,but she also serves as Chairperson of the Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). The CEQ is responsible for recommending SEQR determinations, holding public hearings and administration of the environmental review process for actions proposed by the County of Suffolk. Ms. Ellcowitz provides expert testimony and affidavits to various Town and Village Boards, Planning Boards and Zoning Boards of Appeals on planning,zoning and environmental matters and has provided testimony and affidavits in court cases. Ms. Ellkowitz has also served as Municipal Planner and/or provided consulting planning and/or environmental services to the Incorporated Villages of Lake Success,Manorhaven, Great Neck Estates, Old Brookville,Brookville and Sands Point and the Town of Babylon and City of Glen Cove. In addition, to ensure compliance with SEQR, Ms. Ellcowitz provides environmental consulting services to various school districts including,but not limited to: Cold Spring Harbor,East Quogue, HalfHollow Hills,Jericho,Lindenhurst,Three Village,Plainview-Old Bethpage,Rocky Point,East Williston, Eastport-South Manor, Westhampton Beach, Harborfields, Patchogue-Medford, Port Washington, East Moriches, Smithtown, Bay Shore, Kings Park, Commack, Oyster Bay-East Norwich,Bellmore-Merrick,Seaford and Waiitagh and to various public libraries including,but not limited to: Manhasset, East Islip and Hauppauge. Prior to forming F&E, Ms. Elkowitz spent several years managing environmental projects for a consulting engineering firm. She has been involved in many diverse projects including the preparation of Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, wetland evaluations, water use and conservation plans, municipal and private planning studies, grant applications, as well as solid waste management plans and Part 360 permit applications. 2 Before entering the field of environmental and planning consulting,Ms.Elkowitz was employed by the Town ofBrookhaven Department ofHousing,Community Development and Intergovernmental' Affairs. She was responsible for preparing environmental assessments for community development projects in accordance with the SEQR Act and the National Environmental Protection Act(NEPA). Representative projects/documents which Ms. Elkowitz has supervised, prepared and/or had a significant preparatory role include,but are not limited to: DEIS.and related SEQR/CEQR Documentation for Kensico Water Pollution Control Program for New York City Department of Environmental Protection; DEIS and related SEQR/CEQR Documentation for Fresh Kills Landfill for New York City Department of Sanitation; EAFs, DEISs, Determinations of Significance and Notices for various School Districts; - DEIS for Rezoning of 147+acre Nassau County Property for Nassau County; DEIS,and FEIS for Rezoning of 170+acre Roosevelt Raceway for property owner; Various Planning,Zoning,Environmental and Visual Assessments for Public Utility Communications Facilities and other Wireless Carriers; DEIS and FEIS for development of 22+acre commercial center in Stony Brook for private.applicant; LWRP and environmental and planning tasks for Incorporated Village of Manorhaven; DEIS and FEIS for 200+ unit Planned Retirement Community in Amityville for, private applicant; DGEIS for creation,of Incentive Zoning District for the Town of Goshen; DEIS and FEIS for 23+ acre subdivision in the Village of Kings Point for private applicant,USACOE and NYSDEC wetland applications and presentations at public hearings; 3 DEIS and FEIS for a commercial building in Woodmere, securing of NYSDEC and USACOE wetland permits,presentations at public hearings; Preparation of an EAF and environmental report for a proposed solid waste management recycling facility in Brookhaven; EAF and Environmental Report for proposed 40 unit residential development for the deaf in Coram; DEIS and FEIS for residential and commercial development in Riverhead, securing a NYSDEC Freshwater Wetland Permit; DEIS and FEIS for waterfront condominium complex in Freeport,expert testimony on wetlands and representation of client before Freeport Planning Board,preparation of NYSDEC and USACOE Wetland Applications; DEIS and FEIS for corporate park in Holbrook, data collection and preparation of economic analysis report for proposed corporate park; DEIS and FEIS for 80 unit residential condominium complex in Coram,preparation of wetland application; FEIS for an affordable housing development in Riverhead, preparation of an Affordable Housing Corporation Grant Application; DEIS and detailed water use and conservation study for Marriott Hotel expansion, Uniondale, expert testimony associated with SEQR process; DEIS and FEIS for residential subdivision in Beekman/East Fishkill, expert testimony associated with SEQR process; DEIS and FEIS for an office condominium complex in Wantagh, expert testimony c associated with SEQR process,preparation of NYSDEC freshwater wetland permit application; DEIS and FEIS for a shopping center in Patchogue,expert testimony associated with SEQR process. 4 EXPERIENCE Principal and Corporate President. Responsible for operations of a multi-disciplined environmental and planning consulting firm. Technical tasks include the preparation of_ environmental impact statements; environmental assessment forms; site assessments; waterfront revitalization programs;wetland evaluations;planning studies;and various permit applications and related analyses for public and private clients. Environmental presentations and expert testimony before various municipal boards and community groups. Administrative tasks include all business operations, personnel management, budgeting, billing, marketing etc. Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc., 368 Veterans Memorial Highway, Commack,New York. August, 1988 -Present. Environmental Proj ect Manager/Planner. Responsible for the preparation of environmental impact statements, environment assessments and planning studies for private clients and municipalities. Environmental presentations and testimony to Town Boards and Planning Boards. Preparation ofvarious New York State Department ofEnvironmental Conservation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Nassau County Department of Health and Suffolk County Department of Health Services permit applications. Coordination of State Environmental Quality Review procedures. Site evaluations and environmental assessments for real estate developers. Administrative functions including proposal and contract preparation,budget analysis, and billing. Supervision of professional and support staff. Baldwin&Cornelius, P.C., 210 Express Street,Plainview,New York. December, 1986 -August, 1988. Neighborhood Aide/Assistant to the Housing Rehabilitation Administrator. Completion of environmental reviews for all Community Development projects in accordance with SEQR and NEPA. Preparation of grant proposals. Assisted in the first affordable housing program for the Town ofBrookhaven-the Neighborhood Homes Program. Credit feasibility analyses for SONYMA mortgage applicants. Interviewing for residential rehabilitation, materials grant and townwide handicap ramp programs,evaluation of applications and subsequent loan recommendations. Monitoring and coordinating of the Materials Grant and Townwide Handicap Ramp programs,monitoring of loan repayments and analysis of project income. Solicitation of consultants and engineers for public works projects. Coordination of public _ works projects and contract compliance with federal regulations. Preparation ofbudgets and �r recommendations for policy changes. Town of Brookhaven Department of Housing, Community Development and Intergovernmental Affairs, 3233 Route 112,Medford,New York. November, 1983 -November, 1986. Instructor. Preparation of and teaching biweekly recitations in algebra and introductory microeconomics, private tutorials, assigning and grading homework and examinations. Association for Public Policy and Management Summer Institute for Minority Students,W. Averell Harriman College for Policy Analysis and Public Management, State University of New York at Stony Brook,New York. Summer, 1983, 1984 and 1985. 5 EDUCATION M.S., Policy Analysis and Public'Management; W. Averell Harriman College for Policy Analysis and Public Management. May, 1985. B.A., Liberal Arts; State University of New York at Stony Brook. May, 1985. SPECIAL PROJECTS Consultant. Responsible for the formulation, implementation and administration of the Residential Rehabilitation Program for the Incorporated Village of Lake Grove. Tasks include interviewing clients, evaluating applications, program coordination, project monitoring and payments. Fall, 1985 -1987. Graduate Workshop. Statistical analysis of usage of the Mastic-Moriches-Shirley Community Library. Recommendations to the Library's Board of Trustees regarding how to increase community patronage and involvement. Spring, 1984. MEMBERSHIPS Chairperson, Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality Environment.Committee of the Long Island Association Board of Directors,Long Island Builders Institute HONORS,AWARDS AND DESIGNATIONS Certified Environmental Specialist and Certified Environmental Inspector,Environmental Assessment Association, 1994. Magna Cum Laude Graduate, State University of New York at Stony Brook. May, 1985. Winner,Presidential Management Intern Program. Spring, 1985.