The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-474 01-26-2002 10:12AM FROM ORIENT COUNTRY STORE LTD. TO 7651366 P.01 ,Albert .K�ra"ki,PmWdent j r Town lisp r J 5M5.Route 26 '• :I; JBtc►e '�I :'SA!l+y'e Yre�dent 1>.Q,Smt.1�79: Flmisr,� a Southold,New York 119171 Naar PQl"iw a x'8 3t B(631)?651 I ! i• Far(031)?66-1566 I I ill• � � .. ' • BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEVS j TOWN or SOUTW)ta Jun 22�2c�1. I ; I. J' I evi 1 a►u tlhad,`Esq. f,, �{ � :J E� UN 2 6 2001 spu Ojcle .I VIHAtiF' M ' I' ice'ILK:i�+(cgftlin: � � • I' p a Ceitit'jf► lei jW06otl,the aot d atotioe$that'the un-peirn�Atted sued xci�aittxs in its oaaigi the died within . l itse relocate or � 3C?clays. ' I th • *WS, 1 I � ! IA ort J.xmp bosnd c 'Tteea M III I I; I TOTAL P.01, Albert J. Krupski,President ��FFD(� Town Hall James King, Vice-President �� G 53095 Route 25 Henry Smith P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Artie Foster y Ken Poliwoda �y • Telephone(631) 765-1892 col � Sao Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD"OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOW IN OF SOUTHOLD June 22, 200 i J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esq. P.O. Box 1210 Southold,NY 11971 RE: ORIENT WHARF CO. Dear Mr. McLaughlin: On a recent field inspection, the Board noticed that the un-permitted shed remains in. its original location. Pl--3se..reioca'Le or remove the shed within 30 days. !.ILarAC vo.a. Vctrj :Ldy yours, Arlen.J. Krupski, Jr. ?resident,Board of Trustees AJK:hns 1.KEVIN MCLAUGNLIN Attorney At Law Winds Way Professional Center 44020C Rt.48,P.O.Box 1210 Southold,New-York 11971 Telephone(631)765-6085 Facsimile(631)765-1856 June 8, 2001 Board of Town Trustees r __.. ... Town of Southold l P.O. Box 1179 '; �t Southold, NY 11971 4 JUN I I 200 I ;;_. Re: Orient Wharf Company Gentlemen: Please be advised that my client is awaiting a written approval from the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation regarding the piling work approved by you at your April, 2001 meeting. It is our understanding that the DEC is scheduling a meeting with the contractor in order to clarify the exact work being contemplated.As a result, my client probably will not be able to undertake this work until the fall. Very ru 'y s, J. K in ,A.lbert J.Krupski, President S, James King,Vice-President ;�� Q� Town Hall Henry Smith 53095 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Artie Foster ca Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ken Poliwoda Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 25, 2001 J. Kevin McLaughlin. Esq. PO Box 1210 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Orient Wharf Company Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The Southold Town Board of Trustees will put a time limit on the permitted activit granted at our April Meeting. Please contact us to discuss a time frame. y, Thank you. Very truly yours, Alberti. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:cjc 05/04/2001 15:22 63176Ei'7-`71 6 KEVIN MCLAUG-"-="; PAGE 01 L IMrIM MCLMA!!UM AM may At 1Aw Winds way Professional Ccnta 44020C Rr,49,P.O.Box 1210 Southol New York 11971 Telephoee(631)763-6095 Facsimile(631)765-18% May 7, 2001 Board of Town Trustees SAY ^ 4 "001 Town of Southold Fax No. 766-1366 Re: Orient Wharf Company Gentlemen: At the meeting held on April 25, 2001 there were two issues before you: 1) a Coastal Erosion Kermit Application for the shed enclosing the water treatment filters; and 2) a Wetland Permit Application for an Amendment to Permit#474 to remove, relocate and install certain pilings. After length discussion it was the clear decision of the Board of Trustees that the Amendment to Permit#474 regarding the piling was granted, and a separate decision that the existing shed must be removed from its present location. If, and only if the applicant Yv sheds relocate the existing shed to a I cation behind the al Erosion Hazard Line, the applicant was directed to file an amended plan showing the proposed location of the shed. At no time was there ever any indication that these two applications were linked, or that in order to obtain the Amendment to Permit#474 the applicant must file an amended plan to relocate the existing shed to a new location. In fad,the applicant has no present intention of relocating the shed to a position below the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. However, the applicant plans to immediately begin the process of removing, relocating and installing certain piling pursuant to the plan already on file with the Trustees. Please immediately issue an Amendment to Permit$474 allowing my clients to begin the piling work, which has been approved by the Town Trustees. r. ve y`um, L wrtw�tuq s CL i ©-� � � Albert J. Krupski, President �SUFFO(�-� Town Hall James King,Vice-President h.1o9~' �� 53095 Route 25 Henry Smith c P.O.Box 1179 Artie Foster Southold,New York 11971-0959 Keri Poliwoda �.�� Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOW.'�T TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD M, 4, 2001 Ms. Susan Long S.E.L. Permits P.O. Box 46 East Marion, NY 11939-0046 Re: ORIENT WHARF CO. 2110 Village Lane, Orient SCTlvI#24-2-28.1 Dear Ms. Lorig: The following action was taken at the Southold Town Board of Trustees meeting held on W—.-dnesday, April 25, 2001: k�::iOLVED, that the Southold Town Board of Trustees Appro-.re the req;pest tar an ;=:aendment t'l-rillit#474 to remove 54 pilings from west side of timber pier .qn, .relocate to nort' side of solid atone/rock pier. Install approx. 84 pili:igs or,,south side of_-Xistuig soli! s::one/rock pier. This ;s not a determination from any other agency. IL�.7oa have any questions, please call our office at (631)) 765-1892.. Sincerely, Albprt J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:lms. DEC Albert J. Krupski, President . �gOFO(�-c Town Hall James King,Vice-President �� iy 53095 Route 25 Henry Smith c P.O.Box 1179 cooSouthold,New York 11971-0959 Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT EERIYF-iT Date: May 4, 2001 SCTM#24-2-28.1 Name of Applicant/Agent: S.E.L: permits Name of Permittee: ORIENT WHARF CO., Attention: Linton Duell Address of Permittee: P.O. Box 243, Orient,NY 11957 Property Located: 2110 Village Lane, Orient,NY 11957 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVIT;': Remove 54 pilings from west side of timber pier and relocate to north side of solid stone/rock pier. bastall approximately 84 pilings on south side of existing solid stone/rock pier. SPECLA-L CONDITICN �apply;i'n:a'xedI Bluff restoration through a re-vegetation plan is a necessary special condition of this permit. _A relocation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. A maintenance agreement is attached with application and is a necessary special condition of this permit. Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/Ims cc: DEC Tower Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Telephone Southold:New York 11971 O�y. OT. . (631) 765-1892. SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Monday, April 16, 200-1, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Bob Ghosio, seconded by Scott Hilary, it was. RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL of the Amendment Request to Permit##474 and Coastal Erosion Permit Application of ORIENT WHARF CO. 24-2-28.1 for the existing 6'X 8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment to remain on the wharf as long as the filtration system is required to obtain a safe water supply, and to remove 54 pilings from west side of timber pier and relocate to north side of solid stone/rock pier. Install approx. 84 pilings on south side of existing solid stone/rock pier. 2110 Village Lane, Orient Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried 1.KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN Attorney At Law Winds Way Professional Center 44020C Rt.49,P.O.Box I2I0 Southold,New York 11971 Telephone(631)765-6085 Facsimile(631)765-1856 March 19, 2001 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Orient Wharf Co. Gentlemen: I have enclosed the original and two copies of the Coastal Erosion Permit Application and Environmental Assessment Form, Transaction Disclosure Form and survey in the above- referenced matter, along with my check in the sum of$50.00 for this minor project. Please schedule this application for your next available date. Ve r y ur i cl-aughlin Encs. Hand Delivered ' MAR 19 20' i S �0$ISFFU�,�c JEAN W. COCHRAN GREGORY F.YAKABOSKI h.�� r/y Supervisor TOWN ATTORNEY o y 2 Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 MARY C.WILSON • Southold, New York 11971-0959 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY *4 Telephone (631) 765-1889 Fax(631) 765-1823 E-mail: townattorney@southold.org OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 28, 2001 J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esq. ---- Winds Way Professional Center - 44020C Rte. 48 P.O. Box 1210 FEB 2 8 2001 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Orient Wharf Company Dear Mr. McLaughlin: I am writing you in regards to the issue of whether or not the Orient Wharf Company must make an application for a Coastal Erosion Permit under Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code. It is the Trustee's position that the water filtration system and shed enclosure are "regulated activities" as per Chapter 37. The Trustees do not support the contention that the structure in question is part of the .wharf structure and an "unregulated activity". Therefore, a Coastal Erosion permit application should be made by your client. Please feel free to contact our office if there are any questions. Sincerely, Ma C WitFn Assistant Town Attorney cc: Albert J. Krupski, President, Board of Town Trustees 02/21/2001 09: 32 6317651856 KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN PAGE 01 _j,IM111N MUMGHLIN Artomey At La- Winds Way Professional C=w 44020C Rt.48.P.O.Box 1210 Southold,New Xark 11971 Telephone(631)765-6085 Facsimile(631)765-1856 February 21, 2001 Southold Town Trustees Fax No. 766-1366 FEB 2 1200 i Re: Orient Wharf Company Gentlemen: --=------------- - - -- Transmitted hereby is my latest correspondence with the Southold Town Attorney's office,to which I have not received a response. As a result, request is hereby made that the above-referenced matter be adjourned to your next schedule meeting. Please advise me In writing of the date thereof. Ve y u J. n Enc. 02/21/2001 09: 32 6317651856 KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN PAGE 02 L IM N MCLUONLIN AttorncY At Lew Winds Way Professional Centcr 44020C R1.48,P.O.$vx 1210 Southold,New York 11971 I'elephona(631)765-6085 Fecsimilc(631)765-1856 February 15, 2001 Office of the Southold Town Attorney Attn, Gregory F. Yakaboski, Esq. Southold Town Hall FEB 2OOI P.O. Box 1179 - Southold, New York 11971 Re: Orient Wharf Company with Southold Town Trustees -- Dear Mr. Yakaboski: Pursuant to our recent telephone conversation, you were to review the necessity for a Coastal Erosion Permit for the temporary shed situate on the Orient Wharf. I have held off filing a formal application for a Coastal Erosion Permit with the Southold Town Trustees pending your response.As I have advised you,the subject shed Is temporary in nature. We have always agreed that the shed will be removed as soon as the Suffolk County Health Department has advised us that the water filtration system housed In said shed is no longer needed. Pursuant to Mary Wilson's letter dated December 20, 2000, it is our position that the shed is located within the"structural hazard area" and, therefore, is permitted, as it is a movable structure. Again,the shed is located on the wharf,which has existed at this site for over 100 years. Additionally, if this shed is deemed to require a Coastal Erosion Permit, there are literally hundreds of other structures within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area that must be held to the some standard. Please contact me upon receipt of this letter, so that we can discuss this matter. V ry trul you , J. e ' a cc: Orient Wharf Company IJO' o0e A o oy -t 10/ kill Albert J.Krupski,President �QSOR/(CO Town Hall James King,Vice-President o�0 � 53095 Route 25 Henry Smith P.O.Box 1179 Artie Foster Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ken Poliwoda Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 26, 2001 Orient Wharf Co. 2110 Village Lane Orient,NY 11957 Attention: Mr. Linton Duell Dear Mr. Duell: The Orient Wharf Co. is in violation of Town Code, Chapter 37-Coastal.Erosion:. The Orient Wharf Co. must apply for a permit within the time allowed,which would be by February 1, 2001, in order to be placed on the regular February meeting of the Southold Board of Trustees. . Sincerely, Albert J. KApski, Jr. President,Board of Trustees AJK:cjc. CC: Monsanto/Perry Salvadorini Application Attached 01/23/2001 15:58 6317651856 KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN PAGE 01 1,KMN MCU MONUM Attorney At Law winds way Professional Center 44020C Rt.48,P.O.Box 1210 southold,New Yank 11971 V6ne(631)765-6085 Fax(631)765-1856 January 23, 2001 Board of Town Trustees ; _- Town of Southold Attn. Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President -P.O. Box 1179 �'- JAN 2 4 2001 ' Southold, New York 11971 Re: Orient Wharf Company Dear Mr. Krupski: I am in receipt of your facsimile transmission to me of this date. Enclosed herewith is another copy of the transmittal letter of T.M. Martin of the Water Quality Unit of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Clearly, the removal of the filtration system and the shed housing the same would be premature at this point. While the latest water sample results show Alachlor just below the MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level), the Department of Health Services wants to resample the water supply when the same is reactivated in the spring. We have agreed to the removal of the shed and the filtration system when, and only when,the county authorizes such removal. Please review my letter to you dated June 23, 2000 wherein I state: "Again, the applicant will remove the filtration system and shed, as soon as the Suffolk County Health Department determines that the water supply is safe."To prematurely remove the filtration system without county approval, and thereby expose a large number of people to a potentially dangerous water supply seems irresponsible at best, and could result in potential liability on behalf of the Orient Wharf Company and/or the Orient Yacht Club. Ve t yy u J. Ke cc: T.M. Martin, Water Quality Unit Orient Wharf Company 01/23/2001 15:58 631765185E- - KEVIN MCLAUGHLIh' PAGE 02 _ t COUNTY OF SUFFOLK t . JAN Z 4 2001 ROEERT J. GAFFNEY SEW'OLK COUNTY MMCUTM DEPARTMENT OF ITEAT SERIMES CLARE B.BRADLEY,M.D.,M.P.11. COMMMSIONER 15Nov00 Orient Yacht Club Attn: Mr Linton Duell Village Lane Orient,N.Y. 11957 Dear Mr Duell: The latest results of water samples collected on 19SepOO from the system serving the Yacht Club have been completed by the Health Laboratory. All the results have been forwarded to the Data Unit where they will be inputted and a printout will be forwarded to you when available. A synopsis of the results are as follows. The raw (untreated)water contained 1..8 ppb of the herbicide Alachlor just below the MCL(Maximum Contaminant Level) set by both Federal and Mate Health agencies. In addition the metabolites (breakdown)products of this herbicide OA and - ES,A,were detected at 1.48 and 2,59, Currently the New York State Health Department sets a 50 ppb MCL on,these UOC's (Unspecified Organic Contaminants) while they are under toxological review. Lastly traces (1 ppb) of the gasoline additive MTBE(Methyl tertiary butyl ether)was found in the raw water. None of these contaminants were detected in the filtered water. When these samples were collected 40,900 gallons of treated water had passed through the meter serving the carbon units. This Department will sample the Yacht Club water system when it is reactivated in the Spring of 2001 to determine if the filters will be necessary next season.. As a result of the findings at the Yacht Club an extensive survey of water quality in the Hamlet of Orient is underway. Preliminary results show widespread contamination with a number of herbicides and there metabolites as well as MT$E_ If you have any questions concemirlg this matter,please call 852-1906. Please excuse the delays in reporting these results but each sample is being examined for over 200 contaminants and the current turn-around time at the lab is about twelve weeks. Truly yours, vY. Nv\ - T.M. Martin Water Quality Unit cc: Town Trustees Culligan. •DN1S10N OF ENN'rRONIKENTAL QUALrTY• DR11V1(ING WATER BUREAU•RNERHEAD COUNTY CENTER•RIVERHEAD NY 11901-3397• Phone(63))852-1905 Fax(631)B52.2743 01/23/2001 14:00 6317651856 KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN PAGE 01 3• ��V��e�� Attorney At Law WindsWay-Pro#'esdion91 CCenta 44020C Rt.49,P.O.Box 1210 Sauthol .D1ew Y.o k 1,19.7.1 Ptme(631)765-6OBS Fax(631)765-1856 January 23, 2001 Board of-Trustees Town of Southold ,2 fax No.763-13t36 ,r,,6 `- JAN 2 3 200 Re- Orient'Wharf Company 1 Gentlemen: 'My clierrt,has just advised me,that they are scheduled for your meeting on January24, 2001. My'last correspondence With you was my-letter dated'Noverrfber 29, 2000 Wherein"1 requested that this matter be adjourned until your May, 2001 meeting, so that additional water potability tests could'be conducted'by the Suffdlk County Department of'Heatth Services-'The water system has been winterized,thereby necessitating such an adjournment. Having heard nothing further,') assumed that the adjoumment'llad-been granted. Unfortunately, I have a prior commitment for tomorrow, and must therefore request an adjournment until yourFebruary, 2001 meeting.,Kindly advise mein wrf'(ing regarding the adjourned date. As'l'believe you are aware, my client'is currently working With DEC to rectify any outstanding issues of eoncem to that agency. My client is equally interested in resolving any 'issue With your agency, and Will'be happy to worknn conjunction With you to accomplish that result. I am in the process of obtaining a new survey with the Coastal Erosion line included thereon, so that an application for a Coastal Erosion Permit can'be filed,11'required. According to the letter of Mary C. Wilson to your agency dated December 20, 2000, it is uncertain whether such a permit Is required. e t yo -n cc; OtienrWhad Company Albert J.Krupski,President �FFO(,tc - Town Hall James King,Vice-President ti�� Gy 53095 Route 25 Henry Smith c P.O.Box 1179 Artie Foster ti = Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ken Pohwoda 0 Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 23, 2001 J. Kevin McLaughlin Attorney at Law. 44020C Route 48 P.O. Box 1210 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Orient Wharf Company Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The Southold Town Board of Trustees has reviewed the data and letter from the Suffolk County Health Dept. The test results show the water to be safe under current County standards and testing capabilities. Your letter of June 23,2000 states that the applicant, Orient Wharf Co.,will remove the filtration system and shed. The Board waited for the new water tests, which indicate good water quality, and now expect the Orient Wharf Co. to abide by it's agreement to remove the shed and filtration system immediately. In the future, any activity on the Wharf must receive a Wetland Permit from this Board under Chapter 97, as well as a Coastal Erosion Permit, under Chapter 37. Failure to comply with either code will result in enforcement action. Sincerely, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:lms VIA FAX &MAIL aaow ecy at P-cm w"`Ula*YuP6 iia d eentet 44020e 9U.48,Y.O.✓%x 1210 SauffwU,Xew Vm&11971 J e. Vo.(631)765-6085 .``tact.ffa(631)7654856 November 29, 2000 Board of Town Trustees � M - Town of Southold I U1 Ui Feather Hill Complex Southold, NY 11971 NOV 3 0 2000 Re: Orient Wharf Company R P Gentlemen: �- - - I have enclosed a copy of Mr. Martin's letter dated November 15 , 2000 regarding the water quality for the water system servicing the dock and the Orient Yacht Club. As you can see, the Department of Health Services wants to re-sample the water in the spring of 2001 , when the water system is reactivated. Therefore, request is hereby made that this matter be adjourned until at least May, 2001 to allow the re-testing of the water. I have also been advised that there may be an issue regarding a Coastal Erosion Permit requirement. Please be advised that the Orient Wharf Company is ready and willing to file for such a permit should one be determined to be require . Ve - y ur J. v cLaughlin Enc. Hand Delivered i I _ R•oBrRT J. GAFFNEY SIJF' O'LK cotTNrry MCECi MT, I i E.BRADLEY. z.D.,A.P,H. DEPART VM iT OF HE VI;TH SERVICES CoMI4i3ssipvlER orient L..�. Ciub yr.r `neon Dueii .- -1 . 1 Dear lvir Duell; The latest results of water samples collected on 19Sep0O frou� the systelr serving the Yacht Club j have been cornpieted by;lie Health Laboratory. All the results have been forwarded to. the Data Unit-where they will be inputted and a printout will be fonvarded.to you when available. ! A synopsis of the results are as follows. The ratio (.untreated) water contained 1..8 ppb of the herbacide below the MCL(Maximum C011taminant Level) set by both Federal and State Health agencies. In addition the metabolites (breakdown) products of tl.is herbicide 0-A. and ES...k were detected at 1,48,and 2.59. Currently the New York State Health Department sets a 50 pPh MCL on.thcse L'OC's (Unspecified Organic Contazninaztts) while they are under ef) agical review- Lastly traces (1 ppb)of the gasoline additive MTBE ('Methyl tertiary butyl ether} was i ; foitnd'i in the raw water. None,uf these contal�inants were detected in Ilse filtered water. When these.satxrples were. i collected +c3,900 gallonslof.treated water had passed through the meter servi.zlg the'carbon units.: i This Depaltm nt a-i11 Sanlple the,Yacht Club water system when it is reactivated in tl�e Sprili of 2001 o det.zn.nine ; the 51mrs will be necessary next season. As a re of..the -Indings at the Yacht Club an extensive survey of water quality fir: the Hamlet of Orient is. undet-way. preliminary results show widespread contamination with a n.uz�zber of I,,,ides and there metabolites as well as MI TBE. if you have at y questions concep ing this matter, please call 852-i 90b. Please excuse the delays it] )"�pOrtln�' these results but each sample is being examined for over 200 contarl��i=ants alzd t11e ctlrretztfurn-around time at the lab is about twelve weeks... Truly yours, T.tit. Ylartin waterQuality Unit cc.- T'Own. Trustees Culligan •DRj1ti(liti(.)F Ej,�vf.LON\SEN7AL QUALMS' DR1AtCL`G 1 ATER gLRrAL+• RS\'ERFIL.a1) Tl'�L' S[k.R e RS\'1{1c:FtEA1)N i 1 IYrJl•�:+?^e i phanc(i,31)$$2-1005 Fay(t531?853-7.743 I 09/20/2000 09:53 51G7G51856 KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN PAGE 01 Z. Nevin abuse yF&PAuu 9ULula WMV 9N4A a d eadn "020e 5&48,.T.d..o<e 1210 sic,san"11471 Jd X&(631) 765.6085 9"No.(631)765-1856 September 20 , 2000 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold (�? vd� ' Fax No. 765- 1366 t" �"i 5Ep Re: Orient Wharf Company � � Gentlemen;The amendment application to allow the existing shed. which houses necessary water filtration equipment. to remain on the wharf is scheduled for your meeting this evenitsg. To date, we have not received the results of the latest water sample, a copy of which your Board has requested prior to proceeding with this application. Additionally. the corresponding Town Code violation is scheduled for this Friday, September 22 . 2000 in Southold Town Justice Court. We anticipate resolving that violation at that time. As a result, request is hereby made to adjourn our amendment application to your October meeting date. Very t u y J. u n affawaj.t7t 2ma w" Wa,�Ywfe66&w emtn 44020e Zt.48,Y.C.Max 1210 Southold,.Neuc Vw&11971 9& No.(631)765-6085 3az V&(631)765-1856 .June 23 , 2000 Board of Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 ,SIN Southold, NY 11971 Re: Orient Wharf Company Premises: 2110 Village Lane, Orient, Gentlemen: Pursuant to your request, I have enclosed the Letter of Request for an Amendment, along with Notice to Adjacent Property Owners in the above-referenced matter, which is scheduled for your July 19, 2000 meeting. I have spoken with Tom Martin for the Suffolk County Health Department regarding the necessity of the filtration system on the new well. He reaffirmed that the filtration system was necessary, although the new well had not yet been tested, because of its proximity to the old well (approximately six feet) and the general contamination of wells in the neighborhood. Water samples have been taken- from the new well, but contaminates resulting from the new piping must be flushed out before a new test for over 200 possible contaminants can be effectively conducted. Again, the applicant will remove the filtration system and shed, as soon as the Suffolk County Health Department determines that the water supply is safe. Very u yo rs e aug n Encs. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK NOV 2 f ROBERT e7.'GAFFNEY. � J... _.� ' SUFFOLH COUNTY EXECUTIVE- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CLARE B.BRADLEY,M.D.,M.P.H. 15Nov00 COMUSSIONER Orient Yacht Club Attn: Mr Linton Duell Village Lane Orient,N.Y. 11957 Dear Mr Duell: The latest results of water samples collected on 19Sep00 from the system serving the Yacht Club have been completed by the Health Laboratory. All the results have been forwarded to the Data Unit where they will be inputted and a printout will be forwarded to you when available. 'A synopsis of the results are as follows. The raw(untreated)water contained 1.8 ppb of the herbicide Alachlor just below the MCL-(Maximum Contaminant Level) set by both Federal and State Health agencies.In addition the'inetabolites (breakdown)products of this herbicide OA and ESA were detected at 1.48 and 2.59. Currently the,New York State Health Department sets a 50 ppb MCL on these UOC's (Unspecified Organic Contaminants)while they are under toxological review. Lastly traces (1 ppb) of the gasoline additive MTBE (Methyl tertiary butyl ether) was found in the raw water. None of these contaminants were detected in the filtered water. When these samples were collected 40,900 gallons of treated water had passed through the meter serving the carbon units. This Department will sample the Yacht Club water system when it is reactivated in the Spring of 2001 to determine if the filters will be necessary next season. As a result of the findings at the Yacht Club an extensive survey of water quality in the Hamlet of Orient is underway. Preliminary results show widespread contamination with a number of herbicides and there metabolites as well as MTBE. If you have any questions concerning this matter,please call 852-1906. Please excuse the delays in reporting these results but each sample is being examined for over 200 contaminants and the current turn-around time at the lab is about twelve weeks. Truly yours, T.M. Martin Water Quality Unit cc: Town Trustees Culligan ♦DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DRINKING WATER BUREAU*RIVERHEAD COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD NY 11901-3397 Phone(631)852-1905 Fax(631)852-2743 TIMOTHY FROST BAY HOUSE Orient,New York 11957 June 21, 2000 a �C\ zooa i Trustees of The Commonalty of the Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Orient Wharf Co. Dear Sirs: This letter is written on behalf of Timothy Frost and David and Clair Air who are the adjacent property owners to Orient Wharf Co. and respectively the owners of SCTM 1000- 26-1-001.001 and 1000-24-2-27. We write to you to express our objections to any grant of relief to erect or maintain a shed on the wharf. The reasons for our objections are as follows: 1. The applicant has no legal authority to apply for permission to erect a shed on the wharf, because the applicant does not own the land under water and the historic grant from the State allows only the erection and maintenance of a wharf or dock to promote commerce; 2. The grant of relief introduces an undesirable change in the neighborhood since it allows the location of a building seaward of waterfront residences; 3. No approvals have been obtained or even applied for from the New York Department of State, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 4. The alachlor problem was detected with respect another well, not the well reportedly now in use (the water sample was taken July 21, 1999, but the present well for which the filter is proposed did not exist until recently), and therefore there is in fact no demonstrated need for the shed to house the proposed filters; Trustees of The Commonalty June 21, 2000 Page 2 5. The applicant is proceeding without an actual survey showing the exact location of the shed, even though(a)the shed is a structure, (b) a structure requires a building permit, (c)there is no regulation enacted by the Town Board exempting this structure because it is less than 100 square feet, and (d) in all events a variance is necessary from the ZBA; 6. The applicant's premises appear to be improved with numerous improvements which do not have the requisite approvals and consideration of this application on either a crisis basis or business-as-usual basis merely adds another improper approval to a history of indifference to required approvals; and 7. The application should not proceed without the consideration and requirement of a bond to allow removal of the already built (without a single permit from any of the agencies, including the Building Department, Zoning Board of Appeals, DEC, DOS, Trustees and Army Corps) shed in the future. Thank you for reading this letter and making it part of the record of this proceeding. Very truly yours, TIMOTHY FROST, and DAVID AND CLAIR AIR Timothy Frost TIMOTHY FROST BAY HOUSE Orient,New York 11957 June 21, 2000 Trustees of The Commonalty of the 71 Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 JUN 2 1 2000 r 1 , Southold,NY 11971 TGI Re: Orient Wharf Co. -- - -=- - Dear Sirs: This letter is written on behalf of Timothy Frost and David and Clair Air who are the adjacent property owners to Orient Wharf Co. and respectively the owners of SCTM 1000- 26-1-001.001 and 1000-24-2-27. We write to you to express our objections to any grant of relief to erect or maintain a shed on the wharf. The reasons for our objections are as follows: 1. The applicant has no legal authority to apply for permission to erect a shed on the wharf, because the applicant does not own the land under water and the historic grant from the State allows only the erection and maintenance of a wharf or dock to promote commerce; 2. The grant of relief introduces an undesirable change in the neighborhood since it allows the location of a building seaward of waterfront residences; 3. No approvals have been obtained or even applied for from the New York Department of State, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 4. The alachlor problem was detected with respect another well, not the well reportedly now in use (the water sample was taken July 21, 1999, but the present well for which the filter is proposed did not exist until recently), and therefore there is in fact no demonstrated need for the shed to house the proposed filters; I Trustees of The Commonalty June 21, 2000 Page 2 5. The applicant is proceeding without an actual survey showing the exact location of the shed, even though (a)the shed is a structure, (b) a structure requires a building permit, (c)there is no regulation enacted by the Town Board exempting this structure because it is less than 100 square feet, and (d) in all events a variance is necessary from the ZBA; 6. The applicant's premises appear to be improved with numerous improvements which do not have the requisite approvals and consideration of this application on either a crisis basis or business-as-usual basis merely adds another improper approval to a history of indifference to required approvals; and 7. The application should not proceed without the consideration and requirement of a bond to allow removal of the already built(without a single permit from any of the agencies, including the Building Department, Zoning Board of Appeals, DEC, DOS, Trustees and Army Corps) shed in the future. Thank you for reading this letter and making it part of the record of this proceeding. Very truly yours, TIMOTHY FROST, and DAVID AND CLAIR AIR By Timothy Frost i L'. f]� W 15 June 2000 JUN 1 5 2000T. ,� 1 Southold Town Trustees ' t`` t�r 1 m Y3.+' Town Hall -- Post Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 By Hand and Certified Mail Re: Orient Wharf Company—Unregulated and Unpermitted Expansion and Additions Gentlemen: Thank you for meeting with us at your onsite inspection of the Orient Wharf Company (OWC)on Wednesday, 14 June, and for allowing us to participate in your review of the recently erected, unpermitted filtration building. We also look forward to the opportunity at the upcoming public hearing to discuss more esthetically pleasing, more economically prudent; and legally compliant alternatives for the placement of possibly needed filtration equipment At your suggestion, we are submitting additional documentation that highlights the most significant aspects of the unregulated and unpermitted expansion and additions to the facilities at OWC. This material is furnished in further support of our letter to the Southold Town Trustees dated 7 June 2000 (copy attached). Enclosed for your consideration, review and action are three surveys/typographic maps. The first, contained in the files of the Trustees, is a survey of OWC facilities(prepared by Van T'uyl and dated 27 November 1978). The second, a topographic map of OWC facilities (prepared by John C. Ehlers and dated 8 September 1999). The third, an annotation of the topographic map showing actual placement of bulkbe4ding, wave suppression slats, and numerous 10-inch spiles—all, except as indicated on the third map, without apparent permits and approvals from those Town, County, State and Federal jurisdictional authorities(including the Southold Town Trustees)with relevant regulatory authority and control over OWC. A chronological review of these documents objectively demonstrates expansion and additions to the facilities over the past several years. This unregulated and unpermitted expansion of OWC facilities raises a number of additional density, parking, marine hydrology and navigation, benthic biology and environmental concerns requiring further review and analysis. With this new knowledge and awareness, we respectfully request that the Southold Town Trustees exercise its jurisdictional authority and take corrective action to require legal compliance with policies, procedures and regulations of Southold Town Trustees. Likewise, to further ensure legal compliance, we wish to inform you that ' Letter to Southold Town -trustees 15 June 2000 Page 2 of 2 we will also seek corrective action from those other Town, County, State, and Federal jurisdictional authorities which have relevant separate and overlapping authority and control over OWC. Again, we thank you for your consideration of this matter, and we look forward both to your response and to appearing before you on 21 June. Respectfully submitted as adjacent property owners and concerned residents of Orient and Southold Town. /s/Timothv T Frost Timothy T. Frost /s/David J. Air David J. Air Attachments Letter to Southold Town Trustees (7 June 2000) Three surveys/typographic maps cc; Jean Cochran(Supervisor) Gregory Yakaboski (Southold Town Attorney) 7 June 2000 FT- Southold Town Trustees �-I �' a Town Hall Post Box 1179 JUN 1 2 2000 Southold,NY 11971 � By Telefax w/o attachment) and Certified Mail (w/attachment) Re: Orient Wharf Company—Unregulated and UWermitted Expansion and Additions Gentlemen: Thank you for meeting with us at your worksession on Wednesday, 24 May, and allowing us to raise concerns regarding the unregulated and unpermitted expansion of facilities at the Orient Wharf Company (OWC). At your suggestion, we are providing additional information to further clarify and support this position. With respect to the immediate matter at hand—the recent construction by OWC of a building to house water filtration equipment—we offer four points for your consideration. .First, although this is a local issue and should be subject to neighborly discussion and mutual compromise, despite repeated requests since December 1999 to discuss the matter, we have been unable to obtain an audience with representatives of OWC—even as construction of the building commenced and continues. Second, the construction of a building by OWC without either a Building Variance from Southold Town Building Department(as required since the structure is within three feet of the property line) or a Wetlands Permit from Southold Town Trustees (as required since the structure is within 75 feet of the shoreline), is but the most recent of what appears to be a pattern of repeated disregard for the regulatory policies and procedures of a number of Town, County, State and Federal authorities which have relevant jurisdictional interest and control. Third, although, as adjacent property owners to OWC, we are sensitive to the health concerns that may require installation of a water filtration system, we are at a loss to understand why a pre-existing and known water condition should allow OWC both to bypass Southold Town's regulatory process and to avoid open discussion of more esthetically pleasing, more economically prudent, and legally compliant alternatives for the placement of possibly needed filtration equipment. Letter to Southold Town Trustees 7 June 2000 Page 2 of 3 Fourth, contrary to Mr. McLaughlin's contention as attorney for OWC, the placement of the filtration building has displaced at least one designated parking space previously available for OWC use. Given that OWC and its tenant, the Orient Yacht Club are already not in conformance with parking requirements of Southold Town, the Southold Town Trustees' acceptance and concurrence in the placement of the building and resulting loss of parking would set a dangerous precedent that other waterfront commercial/maritime establishments could seek to exploit effectively. As mentioned above, and as highlighted at our worksession with you, our far greater concern is not with the building,but rather with the gradual and repeated expansion, alterations, modifications and additions to the facilities at OWC over the past several years—almost all without permits and approval from those governmental and regulatory authorities with relevant jurisdictional authority and control. Over the past five years alone,the most significant aspects of expansion, alterations, modifications and additions to OWC facilities have included the new placement of over 100 ten inch spiles as a new bulkhead along the most western fixed timber dock; the new placement of wave suppression slats along the other fixed timber dock; installation of a number of new and additional mooring slips; dumping of rubble, boulders and rocks in Orient Harbor on property adjacent to OWC (southside of OWC property); and, placement of numerous new and additional spiles in Orient Harbor. These unregulated and unpermitted expansion, alterations, modifications and additions to OWC have led to increased activity at the site and raise a number of additional density, parking, marine navigation and pollution concerns. Given recent actions by OWC—and to better understand the Southold Town Trustees' regulatory process and our rights as adjacent property owners—we have requested, received and reviewed the files of the Southold Town Trustees relating to OWC. With few minor exceptions, OWC has apparently undertaken expansion, alterations, modifications and additions to its facilities without Trustee knowledge and approval. In those few cases in which OWC has actually sought and received Southold Town Trustee approval, such as Wetlands Permit No. 474, the files appear to reveal that such expansion, alterations, modifications or additions were undertaken without the approval of certain other required governmental authorities, and possibly in the face of their explicitly stated objection. Therefore, in those jurisdictional areas where the Southold Town Trustees have an interest and jurisdiction over OWC, we respectfully request that you exercise those interests and take corrective action to require legal compliance with policies, procedures and regulations of Southold Town Trustees. Likewise, to further ensure legal compliance, we wish to inform you that we will also seek corrective action from those Town, County, State, and Federal jurisdictional authorities which have relevant separate and overlapping authority and control over OWC. Letter to Southold Town Trustees 7 June 2000 Page 3 of 3 In conclusion and preparation for the on-site visit by Southold Town Trustees on 14 June, and to simplify and best illustrate the unregulated and unpermitted expansion, alterations, modifications and additions to OWC facilities which we claim, we request that you review the attached survey of OWC facilities (prepared by Van Tuyl and dated 27 November 1978) contained in the Southold Town Trustees' files. Comparison of this survey with the current extent of OWC facilities (as subject to regulation and permit by the Trustees) will objectively demonstrate the expansion of OWC facilities and OWC's blatant disregard for the regulatory approval process that the Trustees are elected to uphold. Once again, we thank you for your consideration of this matter, and we look forward to meeting with you onsite at the OWC facilities on June 14 to highlight what we believe will be an enlightening visual inspection. Respectfully submitted as adjacent property owners and concerned residents of Orient and Southold Town. /s/Timothy T. Frost /s/David J. Air Timothy T. Frost David J. Air Attachment (Van Tuyl survey of OWC from Southold Town Trustees' files) cc: Jean Cochran(Supervisor) Gregory Yakaboski (Southold Town Attorney) Edward Forrester (Chief of Southold Town Building Department) Walter Millis (Secretary—OWC) J. Kevin McLaughlin (Counsel to OWC) (all w/o attachment) yr• ,c'+-.''.•'i-'- —/'-:.�:. .-•9F'�•"e�'si- •3,i•: - �.�. — +�fF�r:.• 'fin'. - ,R :' r•�' �•� - i� '.!!•r.. .,, ;� �.7P`-' -� •i•, - - :i• = -ry i't'•r_.• _.! ,.r1.r+ 'E'• �:• =.i ' -xg��?�':''�,;"-'�'Y.'`: :Y: .t - � - �:_ •:�{-• - ., 4 firs � i � W — C - AW t7 d - ..,:►tea' �: - ...'� .._ `r c>n _ _ W-QD - f . .- ...♦ j j � /fir. ,f ./�. .. -i�f�t-(,�•� �-� .d:"�..'j;•:_�-.,:�54:_. si- l�j' _ T. _. p :p NI .�. /�, �1+ - �o ri�.;��:�,:�� - �=�'� - _ _ - � -• `,C " r,x b Gee• '��! . JUN 1 5 2000 ; ,. ,s .F �-�.�._.•-.., .- 21+�'1•t !�v•�•G.,::;' i:.i�''L:' �ti��.�.. �y �•-�'i..�_ _ �S.•':'� •yK,`$'^f�:-t-riS :,ti' '-?_ -,-tip' .,+.y. `_•'':f.. - •'y',s. - KwN 'tlr _ •J ✓1. Y'- - _ .f �>r .=s• .. - - 1'J:• 'fit •t'r•Y �•- .. --�4 IA. 7 '4`.••, _ S7 - •yam pL Y f�_ r ti f. lIT- yr .s / v - VAa y t • ,. •�{.` r l:• , ,.. - :-'r .�:• tit - i c5 el .��: � � �;� ,' - . ..mot " :•y,,�:y, a .�. _ ti J j• �3 '': GT 4 c _ '�' AAl� 1 _ _ •' °_:- + �'``'� � j _ 71. gt 40 VIC- . 2000 f \ - .;l,h _t, •a•. _.a. !,� tom: .. •� f i � �._. .... .....-r- - -•- ---- -•'�-�?!'C►'• _ --_�-'.�,1�..••� ��, _ -- '``"r=•r- - '---T"'-'�--=^x,�`�:;:z'.,-r�;'.:.- �. a.•.. G K .1 s �vr� � r'U D D�C ys} .'� � - •5..;��;J_f r? .s.s_ :..++ - ., �:'i�a�tF i a.. � -•-------•- � // �. -y,,' •��____ ea.�'_' _ •'! , '�:' �;. '' - . - _ Imo.. - g��.av-u• rI{^ �`. - - l•L/ ._ r •• _J.'�•• - .. t _ _ 1\- I y:W:ti-:ti • ?wed woMian d Vw ,� ,,\J',_.:-_ -- Q Of VFIi. d 0.0: �t�p�G .qy O� �gotta wd or• - . y�O �S}�' G 9c in b.a saliC ra+o ~ !rwtl •. ' • ! �. :' .�!' A/o ` ;. J Caif`ya y0 •o..¢end an his b~ f 1 4. tun mm,panmt; f/f C�-�C.i'f :"� •J ySF�CA!r1D`'V� fO«fin"`d Ra •- _ I,� mrabtaGarvr*•�.1 81 nm vrnrarM. COUNTY OF SUFFOL K ROBERT J.GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CLARE B.BRADLEY,M.D.,M.P.H. COMMISSIONER October 12, 1999 Orient Wharf Co. , Mr. Linton Duell P.O. Box 387 i Orient,NY 11957 MAY 3 12000 ;,I Re: Orient Yacht Club 2110 Village Lane, Orient,NY se�r��g� u. 4+ Noncommunity Public Water Supply Fed ID 9 5130125 Analytical results of water samples collected on 07/21/99 Dear Mr. Linton: The water samples taken on the above date at the above referenced Noncommunity Public Water Supply have been analyzed for microbiological quality, inorganic chemical content, volatile organic compounds and pesticides. The analysis indicates that at the.time of sampling the concentration of the herbicide Alachlor exceeded the Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL's) or drinking water standards established by the New York State Department of Health for this chemical. The MCL for Alachlor is 2 parts per billion(ppb). A summary of these results are enclosed. Alachlor is marketed under the trade name LASSO by the Monsanto Company, and is approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for use on certain agricultural uses. In N.Y. State such chemical applications are performed by applicators certified by the N.Y. State Department of Environmental Conservation. The herbicide has been found as a groundwater contaminant in several areas of the United States including a number of well locations in Suffolk. Additional wells in your area have been sampled to determine the extent of the problem. Alachlor has been found to cause cancer in laboratory animals that were given high doses of the pesticide. Animal studies also show that consumption of high doses can result in damage to the liver, kidney, spleen and eyes. The process of setting drinking water standards is designed to protect against possible health effects from long term exposure. Effects can also be influenced by the person's age, sex and overall health. In January 1991 the USEPA established this drinking water standard based on conclusions drawn from the animal studies. Connection to an approved community water supply is regarded by this department as the best alternative in solving well water quality problems. However public water is not immediately available in your area and relocation or deepening of your well are not considered viable options. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ■ 415 OSER AVENUE.SUITE 3,HAUPPAUGE,N.Y. 11788 ■ TEL.(51 6)853-2251 OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES FAX (51 6)853-2307 PJA - �.� r.O �•,-:•�'J 'i �' _ l�u.!/ "�!-/,� Y'.•- 7� r- - •� l.r ,- �•', Cj� ?' `� ,�_�J III GC7 17L iGJ� ° jar*t . `F ti4 II� �J��tI /'• �� - _ �} ./fi•^- -(I�.�L'r�T.6' �� _ 3M �I iV� �/ D \� I rrxbble IV lok zXX . '�' "•,;,r/1.•- . �L'•..Y. !1•�.F'i_ 95 •- +:.i-r}:' '..�.; _ - - 4 J ��{'L-•' 41.1,' '.I` a: _ , •-..a; - - ''S' - :i: �i. _ - .a,�. �. .,. ,ii i....n}• • : ''jar Ier :��. �r�'d'� :�•,' _ ++yyam� �Y:-.+.- J _ i .a fir; �S• •,�. J - aJ• 'Y A i�- J=w:' is •d::. - s.�f - &=•• '�1' j,''. .Y .:r . - �'c• j/. •��. - .Jei. ,,fi�ee .� -•fir-.- yy'I'=:t°i •�F. •Il.Z..'r , •t a:'� nc t A- yy iY a• 1 - aYir- - C r •,.ji s' •t ,i r -V r•Y•• _ 4 _ I ta•x. '!. - w.L •,'` ;r -.3 • .. _ +'S•. •.J k./yy y.��• + �,ti. .. ♦ :fi r •. ---------'---_ - ads;;,=._• .. . ._ .. -. _ rz.?S•% - ,. i 'J n; -r'_.. :�%-.icy!::.�`+ r• �_ .. _ `11 •Yr .w.'cG 4J - .'1_i. '` - - - �- , - . -L eri� F ' - - 1 tea• _ -, .. _ ?1•. .`t :.Ir.-'::' ter• %. +- tr 66 Le a� � DEC. .�.� �..., - .�,it ..:=r n•�_ - - ' .__.� - fib) �,�, �" ':;:'C - .�y:a• y ' ga,rn;.,,survy , :. - EdrwYin t - Nb'vJ York blpy - •- i+*i.i. . OF HE V, �anl w i y GK vqt, YOB .T. e .a a d- v - ' G r?b.a+olkw prp ►Omb t. J ( i?!,< t c,;+Ms,,r ln�ro+ee y i J{• „ ��, •. '! !`�:(✓r i' ..,:. •f /.:J !• °/ r �d Q f a^R•to the me..ur y h°'a«+r►ex J r r+ rmd oa hied tM • ' .. _ ''• �- _ nR•Z yo %O;i M•c e°'^wr►.isaor; b r.,,to 11 - �..� CS 25ro lar yne; a+enwl A,Jnt, .•y. - L% r? ic:•I L : FQ vD Svc to tJy w tiwk CA, nrticn.G d N:c lZ . mati- ' / /'� tH �RIa r•01 JM1ar • _ _ .• •:/ v=/L...r— ( •_'Y:.+b,.�.r •` )MO'er.�ifil lRCNtu1:M�W IItrril.�W�rl The Monsanto Corporation, as the manufacturer of this chemical has voluntarily proposed remediation for wells having confirmed concentrations of alachlor exceeding the drinking water standard. The remediation involves providing affected wells with granular activated carbon treatment units. The USEPA has indicated that granular activated carbon is the best available treatment technology for this contaminant. Monsanto has provided this treatment in Suffolk and we have independently confirmed that the treatment removes these concentrations satisfactorily. Perry Salvadorini of Culligan, Monsanto's representative for filter installation, has informed this office that bottled water was provided through the season and that the filters will be installed prior to next season's start up. If you have any questions feel free to contact this office. Verv,trjuly yours, \] Daniel orris Senior Public Health Sanitarian Bureau of Drinking Water cc: Maureen Serifini-NYSDEC Pesticide Registration Unit Thomas Hoogheem, Environmental Operations Director, Monsanto Corp. Perry V. Salvadorini, Culligan, j SUFFOLK COUNT PARTNENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANAL' "Facility Name: ORIENT YACHT CLUB Inspection No.: NC99-1077 Fed. ID #: 5130125 Location: 2110 VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT Sample Date: 07/21/99 Survey #: SV2298 Sample Location: KITCHEN TAP Sanitarian: MORRIS Treatment: NONE Field No.: 501-577-99-07-21 Notes: < symbol means "less than" indicating M detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. *' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Total Aldicarb (calc) .. . ... .... .. . < 0.000 7.00 ug/L Oxamyl. ... . . . . .. .... .. .......... .. < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb..... .. ...... .. .. . . .... ... < 0.500 ug/L Carbaryl.. .. .... .... .. . ... .... ... . < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfoxide. . ... .. . . .... ... < 0.500 ug/L 1-Naphthol.. .. .. .......... . . . . .. .. < 0.500 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfone... .... . . .. .. .. ... < 0.500 ug/L Methomyl.. .. . . .. . ... . ... .... .. . . . . < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Carbofuran. ......... ... ...... . .... < 0.500 40.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon) .... . .. .... .. . . . . < 0.500 50.00 ua/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran. . . . .. .... .... . < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb.... . ... . . . . .. . . .... . . . . < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: BACTERIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services TColi............ .... .. .. .. .. .. ... < ABSENT ABSENT EColi... .. .. .. .. ...... .......... .. < ABSENT ABSENT Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.... . . .... .... .. ... . . . ... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDD. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .... . . . .. . . . < 0.200 50.00 ua/L beta-BHC. .... .... .. . ..... .. .. ..... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDT. .. .... ... ... .. .. .... . . .. . . < 0.200 50.00 ug/L gamma-BHC (Lindane) .. .. ...... . ... . < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Endrin.. . . .. . . . . .. ... . .. . . ... . .. .. < 0.200 2.00 ug/L delta-BHC.... .. .. ... . .. . . .... .... . < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Endrin aldehyde....... .. .. .... .. .. < 0.200 50.00 ua/L Heptachlor. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .... .... . < 0.200 0.40 ug/L Chlordane. . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . .... .. . . < i.000 2.00 uc/L Heptachlor epoxide.... . .. . ........ < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Alachlor.. . . .. .. .. . . .. .. . . . ... . . .. - 8.200 2.00 ug/L Aldrin... ... ... .. . ... . . . . .. . . . ... . < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Methoxychlor.. . . .. . . .. .. . . .... . . . . < 0.500 40.00 ug/L Dieldrir < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan II... ... . ... .. . .... .. .. < 0.200 2.00 ug/L Endosulfan I. .. .... .... .... . . .. .. . < 0.200 2.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. < 0.020 0.05 ug/L Dacthal.... .. .... .. .... .. .. .. .. ... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-dichloropropane... .. < 0.020 0.20 ug/1, 4,4-DDE.... ... ... ... ... ..I. .. .. . .. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DACTH.AL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Monomethyltetrachloroterephthalate < 10.000 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid.. .... < 10.000 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Silver (Ag) .. ...... .... . . . ... .... . < 5.000 100.00 ug/L Nickel (Ni) . .... .... .... .. ........ < 1.000 100.00 ug/L Aluminum (Al) .... .. . ....... . . .. ... = 441.000 ug/L Lead (Pb) ........... ...... .... ... . = 2.910 15.00 ug/L Arsenic (As) ..... .. ........ .. .. ... < 2.000 50.00 ug/L Antimony (Sb) . .. .... ........ ... ... < 1.000 6.00 ug/L Barium (Ba) . ......... . ... .... .. ... = 10.700 2000.00 ug/L Selenium (Se) ... .. .. ...... .... .... < 2.000 50.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be) . .. ..... ..... .. ..... < 1.000 4.00 ug/L Thorium (Th) .... .... .. .. .... . . .... < 1.000 ug/L Cadmium (Cd) . .. .. .... .. . . .... ..... < 1.000 5.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti) . .... .. .... ... . .. .. .. = 21.800 ug/L Cobalt (Co) .. .. . . .. .. . . .. .... . ... . < 1.000 ug/L Thallium (T1) . . .. ... . . .. .... .. . . .. < 1.000 2.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr) .. . ... .. .. . . .... .... . = 2.000 100.00 ug/L Vanadium (V) . . ... . .. . . .. . ... .. .. . . < 1.000 ug/L Copper (Cu) .... .... .... . . . ....... . = 555.000 1300.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn) . .. .. . ..... .. .... .... .... < 50.000 5000.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg) . ... ... .... . . .. ....... < 0.400 2.00 ug/L Iron (Fe) . .. ...... .... ........ .. .. = 0.254 0.30 mg/L Manganese (Mn) ..... .. .. .. . . ...... . = 0.043 0.30 mg/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc) . = 0.297 0.50 mg/L Molybdenum (Mo) .... ............ ... < 1.000 ug/L Sodium (Na) . ...... .. ...... . ..... .. = 28.600 270.00 mg/L Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab..... ...... .... ........ ..... = 6.100 su Ammonia (NH3-N) ..... ............ . = 0.020 me/L Specific Conductivity-Lab......... = 251.000 um/cm Nitrite (NO2-N) ...... ... .... .. .... < 0.020 1.00 mg/L Chloride (Cl) .. ........ .. .. ....... = 32.000 250.00 mg/L Nitrites + Nitrates (NO3-N) . .. .. .. = 5.600 10.00 mg/L Sulfate (SO4) ... ... .... .. .. ...... . = 25.000 250.00 mg/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. .. . �` k/ 3 I)rMAY 3 I nf, SUFFOLK COUNT !ARTNENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANAL? Facility Name: ORIENT YACHT CLUB Inspection No.: NC99-1077 Fed. ID #: 5130125 Location: 2110 VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT Sample Date: 07/21/99 Survey #: SV2298 Sample Location: KITCHEN TAP Sanitarian: MORRIS Treatment: NONE Field No. : 501-577-99-07-21 Notes: <' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. *' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ____= Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.. .. .. .. .. .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L tert-Amyl-Ethyl-Ether. .. ...... .. . . < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane.. .. .. .. .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Benzene. ... . . . . . .. .. .... .... .... . . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane. .... .... .. .. . . ....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Toluene. ... . .. . . . ..... .. . ... ... .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane. .. .... . ... . ... . .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ua/L Chlorobenzene. .. . .. ... .... .. .. .. .. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.... .. .... .. .. .. ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene.... . ... ...... .. . .. ... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane. .... ...... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene.. .. .. .. . . .. .. . . .. . ....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride... . . .... . ... .. .. ... < 0.500 2.00 ug/L m-Xylene.. . . .. ... ... ... . ...... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride... .. . . ... . .. .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L p-Xylene.. .. . . .. .... .... ...... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane. .. .. . . .. . . .. .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes. ...... .. .. ...... .. .. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene. .. .. .. .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene... .... .. .. .. ...... < 0.500 5.00 uc/L Chloroform... . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .. .. . < 0.500 80.00 ug/L 3-Chlorotoluene. .. .. . . .. . . .... .. .. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane. . . . . .. .. .. .... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene. .. .... .. .. .. ...... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroerhane.. .. . . .. . ... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L T. Chlorotoluene.. ... ..... ........ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride. . ... .. ...... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene........ .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chioroethane. .. .. .... . . . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene... . .. ...... < 0,500 5.00 ua/L 1,2 Dichloropropane. . .. .... .. ... .. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L m,p-Dichlorobenzene. .. . ... ........ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene.. . . .. .. . . .. . .... .. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o) . .. ...... .. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromometrane. .. . .. . . ..... . < 0.500 80.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene. ... .. .. .. . .. . . . .. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-3-Chloronropana.. .. .. . . .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Ter ramethylbenzene.... ... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.. . . . . . . .. .... . ... ...... . < 0.500 80A0 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene.. .. . . . . .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethen_e. .. . .. . . .. .. .. .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene.. ... ... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene.. . .. .. .. .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene) .... .. ... . < 0.500 5.00 uc/L Freon 113. ... .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1-Methylechvlbenzene.. .. .. .. .. . ... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene. .. ... . .... ... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropronene.. . . .. . . ...... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene..... ... . .. . ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene.. . .. .. .. .. .... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene. ..... .. .. .. ..... .. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane.. ... .. ....... < 0.500 80.00 ug/L Isopropyltoluere (p-Cymene) ..... .. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2,3 Dichloropropere.. ..... . ....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene.. .... .... .. .. .. .. .. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene. .......... .. . . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene. . ....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE) .. . . < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2 Trichloroethane.... .. .. .. .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene. .. ........... ... .. .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.. ...... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane. . . . .. . . .... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.. ...... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide.... .. .. .. . ..... . ... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloroprooane... .. .. .. .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide. .... .. . . .. .. .. .. < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.. .... .... .. .. . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene. . .. ... ... .... .. ...... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichlorooropane.. . . .. .. ...... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK) .. .... ... ... ... ... < 20.000 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane. .. .... . . ...... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran....... ............ < 20.000 50.00 ug/L tert-Butyl-Ethyl-Ether. .. . . ...... . < 0.500 50.00 ug/L r TOFOGRAFH I CG MAF i "THE ORIENT WHARF" SITUATE: ORIENT o° w \ " TOWN: SOUTHOLD o 11i E SUEEOLK GOUNTY, NY Z,"Pbl'ecl - 5URVEYED 09-081i9, ELEV^TIONS SHOWN HEREON AREEREFERENGED TO M.5.L.NGVD'29 5UFFOLK GOUNTY TAX# Doc 1000 - 24-2 -28.I o° 1 J FIoOlS T IM W-Y ^'s.� 3 dovlt LL P atl� '-- J A-P \`depos ur .c C / aYfall plve / tMer - - J Y _ 'OnPier- --------- _ e16_Gm--/-_---- --- _ !4 �� _ - a{. -• d�flll OOd y ospn wo j� I. .e.l..e.r.... ...... X ' _ !f3 '.R(. i s.. l5` I�/, it 1..t_-'-' t: ' I `•\ \\ .S .-_ S'_ �� SFO P ! a Ijji O I \ 1\ Id.1LgND ILI! JUN 1 5 �000 ,., '7OIN C. EHL.ERS L< �URVE�'OR 4 - -1�1 11 R F 4 9 a Sy._- - E- 6 EAST MAIN STREET `a(-9 e f? I.Y.S.LIC.N0.50202 c q t •". ( i l`` �A e tl % _�' I RIVERHEAD,N.Y.11901 �l' GRAPHIC SCALE I"= 40' j 369-8285 Fax 369-8287 R-PF•-nGER\PROS\warf2 - I r ter. - J� TOF06f;ZAPH I G MAP a` "THE ORIENT WHARF" -'o SITUATE: ORIENT V7 Or " TOWN: SOUTHOLD v s° I ] w E SUFFOLK GOUNTY, NY 5URVEYFD 09-08-99 10 �1 ELEVATION5 5HOM HEREON ARE r REFERENCED TO M.5.L.NGVD'29 J �° 4WWI ILA 5UFFOLK COUNTY TAX x 1000 -24-2 -28.1 1 = Y cl 4 _ LL LL m g�k on ahea e E Li •'fit e��t ,•''_. � / / y- p � pratr� —=®A-Pho/t SL)r � U \ � 20- B pU ''G(" - / - - wttoll pipe ' amber - p ff 44 " St pie _ _ .. -.- _ _,.� _ d•.+ ram_ J 4 1 5 2000 _ _ �d ,jVlv _..-...-.._._ ` olt rood •oloelt -_•._.-._. �overim asp O :o thb- OF r4r tG l ® A-t>-D►i 10 N R Lcis LAND JOFT C. EHLERS SURVEYOR 6 EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S.LIC.NO.50202 i 1 RIVERHEAD,N.Y.11901 GRAPHIC 5GALE 1"= 40' 369-8288 Fax 369-8287 REF,_TTGER\PR0S\warP2 ��—� �o�U��O�Coli Town Hall. 53095 Main Road 'T P.O. Box 1179 Telephone O Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1892 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Tuesday, June 13, 2000, the following recommendation was made: THE ORIENT WHARF CO. 24-2-28.1 to allow for the existing shed, which houses necessary water filtration equipment to remain on the wharf. 2110 Village Lane, Orient The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. . � X feBaugUm attouayt at P-cm tfiJ"Wa*J'�tapokncd eentn 44020e it.48,Y.C.J3ax 1210 SauffwU,.,'sera W.11971 '.TeL Na.(631)765-6085 Sax JYa.(631)765-1856 May 31 , 2000 Southold Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 p1qu Southold, NY 11971 ' MAY 3 1 2000 u 1 Re: Orient Wharf Co: Y SCTM #1000-024.00-02.00-028.001 Gentlemen: a- _'...__ ______. I have enclosed the Letter of Request for a Waiver, along with Notice to Adjacent Property Owners in the above-referenced matter. As we advised you at the work session last week, the small shed was placed on the wharf in order to screen the water filtration system that is necessary in order to provide potable water to the Orient Yacht Club and to the boat slips. A copy of the letter dated October 12, 1999 from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is enclosed herewith. As you can see, the water supply has over four (4) times the allowable limit of the herbicide Alachlor, a known carcinogen. The placement of the filtration equipment was dictated by the location of the well. The carbon filter tanks are approximately 8 1/2 feet tall. The idea of the shed was to scene these filtration tanks from view, and to provide some deterrence to possible vandalism. The only alternative would be to locate the filtration tanks near or, in the Orient Yacht Club building at the end of the wharf. The cost of properly running the necessary plumbing to allow such a placement has been estimated as at least $5 ,000.00. Prior to the placement of the shed, a representative of the Orient Wharf Company was advised by the Southold Town Building Department that a shed of this size (less than 100 sq . ft.) . did not require a building permit. No one realized that a Trustee's Permit would be necessary, as the shed simply sits on top of the wharf, which has existed for well over 100 years. It is anticipated that the filtration system, and therefore the shed, is temporary in nature. The water supply will be periodically tested, and we have been advised that when the untreated water supply tests 'show potable water, the system can be removed: j - My client's intention was to make the best of a bad situation. The public health hazard of the water supply dictated the necessity of the filtration system. The placement of the filtration equipment within a small, tasteful shed was thought to be more visually palatable than simply having two 8 1/2 foot tall filtration tanks open to public view. Our request for a Waiver to allow the shed to remain, as it presently exists, will have absolutely no effect on the wetlands. The shed, with the equipment inside, simply sits on the existing wharf, and will be removed as soon as the health hazard ceases to exist. Ver t u y ur J. e 'n ugh 'n Encs. 05/24/-V00 WED 15:40 FAX 516 852 2743 SUFF.CTY DEPT.OF HEALTI I001 f C,,JNTY OF 5UFFOLK R09ERT J.GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXWLMVE GLARE EL BRAOLET.KD. KP-H- DEPARTMENT of HEALTH SERV ICKS AMNG comwSSIONER C 0 V E A FAX S H E E T y To: I lood kRu SICU Fax#: -7 � � A pp Date: r r� � MAY 2 4 2000 : � .( From ( S$RVICh � SUFFOLY,COUWY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH =,, OFFICE OF WATER ROURCES ES ❑ Bureau of Drinking Wary - Hauppauge Telephone#516-853-3076 FAX#51.6-853-3075 or 516-853-2927 Bureau of Drinking water - Riverhead Telephone#516-852-1905 FAX#516-852-2743 ❑ Bureau of Groundwater Resources - Hauppauge Telephone#516-853-3092 FAX#51.6-853-3075 or 516-853-2927 Pages(Including cover sheet) coNP SFNTS: If there is any problem regarding transmittal of this material,please call TEI.. 15161 083-3076 DIVISION OF LNVIRONMENTAL DUAuTT R 225 RA15RO DRIVE EAST,HAUPPAUGE�H.Y- 1 17e6-ax90 0 CAR 15161 e53-3075 OFFICE OF WATER RFSOURCES 05/24/2000 WED 15:40 FAX 516 852 2743 SUFF.CTY DEPT.OF HEALTI 2002 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK i • Robert J. Gaffney Suffolk County Executive Department of Health Services Clare B. Bradley, M.D., M.P.H. Commissioner Memo To: Southold Town Trustees From: T.M. Martin f Date: 24 May00 Re: Orient Yacht Club ILate in 1999 the herbicide Alachlor was detected above the MCL(Maximum Contaminant Level) in the well serving the Orient Yacht Club. This Department considers the presence of Alachlor in drinking water as a serious public health problem.Attached please find an EPA fact sheet on Alachlor and note the listed health effects. This herbicide is manufactured by Monsanto Corporation and has been found in other wells in Suffolk County as well as other areas of the United States. The maker of the product has a well assistance program and they were notified of the detection. They have filters already installed in Springs, Cutchogue,East Moriches, Shelter Island as well as Orient, In the Spring of this year representatives of the Yacht Club,the Health Department as well as the filter contractor met at the site and discussed the installation of the filters on the existing water system. It was decided to place the filters on the lands end of the wharf closest to the well and pump. The filter contractor offered to provide a shelter for the filters to prevent vandalism and make the installation more esthetically pleasing,which was strongly supported by this Department. Since that time problems with the installation have arisen '• culminating with the issuance of a summons, In almost 4,000 pesticide installations this is the ::q first time problems within jurisdictions have occurred. It is hoped that in the interest of public health a waiver be granted so the Orient Yacht Club will have access to safe potable water. If I can provide any assistance in this matter,please call 852-1906. DRINKING WAFER UNIT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK 119013397 (631)852-1905 05/24/2000 WED 15:41 FAX 516 852 2743 SUFF.CTY DEPT.OF HEALTI 11003 • '` 'United St; Office of Wa7 _ EPA 811-F95-003 b-C Environmt_.__. Protection 4601 October 1995 Agency Drinkin ..EPA National, Primary . g , Water Re • : . Alachlor This is a factsheet about a chemical that may be found in some public DmmGGw,.TM or private drinking'water supplies. It may cause health problems,if nn": �Ro found'in amounts greater than the health standard set by the United . . States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 14r1.: 2 ppe WHAT Is Alachlor is an odorless,white solid.-The greatest use of alachlor is'as a herbicide AL AMOR .for control of annual grasses and broadleaf weeds in crops, priniarily.on corn, AMD How IS rr USED? sorghum and soybeans.Alachlor is the second mostwidely,used.herbicide in the -United States; with particularly heavy use on com and soybeans-in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio, and Wisconsin. The list of trade names given below may help you find outwhetheryou are using this chemical at home or Work: is A[aCHLOR In•197�4.,Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Act This law requires EPA wtrr H REGULATED? to determine safe levels of chemicals in drinking water which do•or may cause health problems_These non able levels,based solely on possible health risks and exposure, are called Maximum Contaminant'Level Goals. The MCLG for aachlor has been set at zero because EPA believes this level- of pn?tection would not cause any of the long-term effects described below. Based on this MCLG;EPA has set an enforceable standard called a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). MCLs are set as close to the-MCLGs.as possible, considering the ability of publicwater systems to detect and remove contaminants using suitable treatment technologies.. The MCL has been set at 2 parks per billion(ppb)because EPA believes,given presenttechnology and resources,this is the lowest level to which water systems i can reasonably be required to remove this contaminant should it occur in drinking water., These drinking water standards and the regulations"for ensuring these stan- •dards are met,are called National Primary Drinking Water Regulations.All publicwater supplies must abide bythesle mes ANo regula#ions. R f WHAT' THE _ erm,EPA has found al '' hlorto potentially causN HctH EFGTs?.. >s. the-following health effects•when people are exposed to I.r.. at levels above the MCL'for relatively short periods of tim;, ..,:: UARZO slight skin andeye irritation.- . Alachlorhas the potential to cause thRosfollowing•effects from a lifetime exposure at levels.abov • Ocfo6er 1995••.'�• • Consumer Version -• •, Printed on Re5yded Paper 05/24/2000 WED 15:41 FAX 516 852 2740 SUFF.CTY DEPT.OF HEALTI U 004 +the MCL:•damage to liver, kids..,, spleen; lining of nose and eyelids; icer. The major source of environmental release of alachlor is through its man ufac- HowmucH ALACHLOR tore and use as a herbicide. Alachlor was detected in rural domestic well water ►s`PRovucF�AND i by EMS National Survey of Pesticides in Drinking Water Wells. EPNs Pesti- RRIEAsED TO THE cides in Ground Water Database reports detections'of'alechlor in ground water ENVIRONMENT*? 'at concentrations above the'MCL in at least 15 States. If released to soil,alachlor can be broken down by bacteria and sunlight,usually WHAT I{APPENs To within two months. However, alachor does not bind to.most soils very well'and •ALAcHcoR WMEN IT Is.RELEASED To may either"evaporate or leach into ground water. THE&MRONM� Sunlight and bacterial action are also important for degrading, alachlor in surface water, but evaporation generally does-not occur. Qnoe alachlor enters ground water, its break down is very slow.., The bioconcentration of alachlor in aquatic.organisms is not important. Any alachlor taken up by plants or animals is quickly eliminated. How wrcc. The regulation for alachlor became effective in 1992'.Between 1993 and 1995, 'How w R EPA required yourwater supplierto collectwatet samples every 3 months for one AL.Aes D,_,7EcTED IN AND year and analyze them to find out if alachlor is.present a ove0.2ppb.lfitispresent REMOVED FROM above this level,the system.must continue to monitor this contaminant. My DRINwNG WATER? If contaminant levels are found to be consistently above-the MCI_,your water supplier must take steps to reduce.the amount of alachlor so that itis consistently below that level.The following treatment methods have been.approved by EPA for removing'alachlor: Granular activated charcoal. If the levels, exc eed'the MCL, 2 pp6 the system must notify the public via How wlri 1 xNoMY j newspapers, adio, TV and other means. Additional'actions, such as providing w ?R Is IN Mr atkematnre drinking water supplies; may be required to prevent serious risks to public health.. Learn-more about your drinking water! EPA strongly encourages peopie to learn-more Your. state Department of Health/Environment is also a abouttheir drinking water,and to support local efforts valuable soui�ca of information. to protecf and,upgrade:the supply of.safe drinking For help in Ioc ating1liese agencies or forInformation on water. Your water bill or telephone books govem- drinking water in general, call: ment listings are a good starting.point EPA's S;f%'.Drinking Water Hotline: (800)426-4791 Your local water supplier can give you a list of the Foradditional information on'the•uses and releases or chemicals they test for in your water,'as well as how cheinlr~sh in your state;contact the, your water is treated. Cfommun'ity.Right t¢-Know Hotline: (too)"535-0202. . consumer Version.• : _ pa: 2�, 039-6 fk co" q � �;, �r .c;r��rw.n' ��ate.oT�w•,pflt`-•-«-�•-�.... ._..—�_ A�pL'}1 'V.r• 8'N?sN 'OAiDGF.I {•qi, J My, . . t fJ*i No Aa .. .. ;,. I., rrcN j F afy�P`q4% Lg GATE RM �tU''�{81tprSY Ctr�e:.QNb jii' ;, 4 3il,ck j 4 n i ems..: Cl If;� t??i L7. 1Yo� rn "rssti a Cy Ci Cy+. ;vay. t , j�i � •: : '•:' '%TN�Pgisiut q�is0a!a�m� •.' `'.. ..•.:..a.., ., •' _ , �` ;ri is ' ;�r; r e •�.4 }[ am oPO ff ' ) ; • � j i l T�iPH]R�{ I1�AHY0� Thr f � .;.'. i t THE A r+ti-'�IN►M(NOT RC1t ryy D P. `AH[lJE IIAM�pi - f di. i4a, is taUi�iSWlp,.nuE_w�ifgtCq` 1 T�� Ibtmgibrlrl . Ifl • 1 -�;! ! ;5-",-Tf ,:,....._-...;,;;_,_,,.;,- '�► 9""at:U7b+ouoaobivn+...e,,�tu:i,,.+,.wo,e+SanM1r,r i. '. DJlkt1 RNE,6 -- . `it .i 801RT►fOID' j ryj9E a6f tsr,s f0• +rs+RAT-�41)r _ [' ! LVldp�Wi�Spg,StWlhOft7r MV JaC7r r` , •a7 �� .. � .,, ,• �, ,,s,.• •,. _ - ` s%. \�i i !pi�dtesr,�e�yim:nc�iEw'aw wwsalka as a '-. .. �;. " .,• .� j _ v. cY.tgh " 3tPtaar' EcrroN r .. '1 05/20/2000 SAT 12:04 FAX 631 734 2315 SOUTHOLD P.D. CHIEF 001 t. Agency 2.Uiviyi�._.._;inct -N.eWYprkSCafe• OR[ a� Orig S.CalcNo 6.Inc! rn 0. {NCIDENT$:E_P•k�RF NY j'i 5 Cl S�aa oL-1 ''// 7,ReisorC Oay B.Dale ') Report Time Occu+red t0.U:fy 1 t.Date 12 Time Occurred 73.Day Dele 75.Timr OrdFrom: To; 16.Incident Typc IT ButineSS Name 1B,Weavon(s) z.: 1�,� � L��, A_ 0 - V 17 Incident Add+e» Street No,Streit Name,Bidi.No..Apt.No.): � 20.City,SLatr,lip(Q C Q i []u) 21 Location Cope .22.OFF_NO- LAW SECTION SU6. . CL ,Car DEG ATT• NAMEpFOFFENSE - Cr 13 No.of victims �J" r� C 2 24. No.of Su:pests ZS:P.arsonType:CO=ComplainantOY.Other-PI=Pewrilnterviuv+edPK PersonReport(ngWi=Wl.LnessNI-'Not Interviewed VI=Victim 2717ne1,ocomplainant ❑y[]ry F r iYT"0 NAME(LAST,FIRST,MIDDLE,r1YL�j ••OBre,ol• sraEEr No:,Si�REBT NAME,aLDG.•NO.,APT.NO.,CITY. SYATp, ZIP' •,;; 1 'Te1c h n Q (-•) r ��t�.'lU Xi_ri O - N' I. Z7.Dace of Birth 2B.Age 27 Sex 30.Race 31.EThnic 32.Handicap 33 RL-IdenCe Slaws 0 Temp.Res.�Forrign NaC. C ❑ M ❑ F ❑White❑ Black❑Ochel ❑ Hispanic❑ Unk. ❑ Yo5 Resident Ypurist❑S[uden[Cj Other ' > ❑U [�Indian❑Asian❑Unk. {] Non-HISFtanic ❑No a Cpmmuter Military ❑Homeless❑Llnk 34.Type/No 35.NAM (LaSL First_Middle) 36.Alias/NicknameMlaiden Name(Utst.Firs[-Middle) 37.Apparent Condition K. Z ❑ Impaired Drugs ❑ Mental DiS (Dunk. 0 ❑Impaired AICo ❑Inj/III ❑App Norm Cr 38.Address(Scree[No.,Street Name,Bldg.No.Apr.No..City,State,Zip) 39.Phone No. 40.Social Security No. G: Q Nome L, Q: ❑ Work VW ." w� 41.Date of Birth 42 Aye 43.Sex 44_Race S.Fchnic 46.Skin 47.Occupatlon 4w ❑ M Q F ❑ White❑ Black ❑Other ❑Hispanic 0 Unk. 0 Light ❑Dark ❑Link. . lA =a ❑ u ❑Indian❑Adian❑unk. ❑Non-Hispanic [7Medium❑Other 46.Height 49.weight 50 Hair 51.Eyes 2.Glasses 53.Build S4.EmPlpycrl5Choo1 55.Address ❑ Yes[] Contacts ❑Small ❑Large N Z .. - Lei ❑Na Q Me01vm . h � 56.Scar)Marks/[attooy(DrsCribe) 57.Miss. a 1 5¢,Vlctlm.or•; 'Property Proaerty: Qpa titiry!•: ;. "•i nAakC•or;',' ` ; N- Status T pe eaziire••' •`r:D7t,"r • Model • SerlalNo_ rrDeSFriptiort, value te ❑r. 4 W 59.Vehicle G0.L icrnyr,PIaTe No Full❑ 61.State 62.Exp.Yr. 63.Plate Typc 66,value Status O :, Partial Q a a 65.Veh_Yr. G6.Make G7 Model 68.Style 65 vlN -V 6 -S 70.Color(s) T I. Towed av• •;„ ,• A Vi 10. 72. ehcle Notes 7 ..._..__� .❑ _ 2- / J a A.f` /n1 i' r�l+r�G .0 u(�a✓��¢ /.0 _f• C�.r/� 7Y/��Y+/7rn0 ��F2�f rJ /�ti - 13 - - 's•r - 13aw; 74.Inquifils(Check all that apply) 7NYSPINssage No. 76 COenpldityan[Signa[ure DMV ❑WantfwArran[ • 1❑Cri IstoryQ StolenPraperty []Other >.li•qn tu+e d nk) 79.Supervisor's signature(include Rank) a0.ID No. �' 84. •m� C- -P�g+� al. Status ❑open Clowd(If Closed,Check baK below) ❑Unfounded 82.Status Date 83.NOtified/TDT of ••�� []Vict.Refused to p IZO Arresr ❑Pros.Declined p warrant Advised d•• _ ❑CBI 111uu-.No CuSCody ❑Arrest-luv. ❑O[tendcr Dead ❑F.[rad.De{Lin Q Unknown •`o e� 7 DCJS-320S (2/97) 'FALSE STATEMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE AS A CRIME,PURSUANT TO THE NEW YORK STATE PENAL LAW 1. Agency 2.Divisio, +ct New'York State 3.ORI Orig 5.Case No. 6.Inci en o. INCIDENT.RETORT NY S/S f L� 5u pp ov - `Y1/� 7.Report Day 8.Date 9 Report Time Occurred 10.Day 11.Date 12.Time Occurred 13.Day 14.Date 15.Time On/From: To: F_ 16.Incident Type / 17-Business Name IS.Wea pon(s) Z V. 19.Incident Address Street No.,Street Name,Bldg.No.,Apt.No.) 20.City,State,Zip(F]C ❑ T ❑V) i 21 Location Code B z 1) 1 ' ,11X6 C 22.OFF.NO. LAW SECTION 'SUB CL CAT DEG ATT NAME OF OFFENSE CTS,. : 23 No.of Victims _ / C. ?-J G✓L'rG p/'/c1 I/ C? L r7�/L. 2 24. No.of Suspects 3 25:PersonType:CO=Complainant OT=Other PI=Person Interviewed PR=Person Reporting WI=Witness Nl=Not Interviewed Vl=Victim 26.ViRim also complainant ❑Y❑N TYPE/NO NA f� ME(LAST,FIRST,MIDDLE,TITLE) Date of. STREET NO.,STREET E REET NAME,BLDG.NO.,APT.NO.,CITY, STATE, ZIP \ H Birth - Telephone No. C 2 O W 3/Z'r/sZ� /�X Z� V✓ L.L�-L �-i/ O \ ��N / / - //�S�/ ; -Z 3�-. �;JJ C. _ ►- t/ l �J/�)lV //�ci 5 O 5 ..ii/, s�� /D JY✓ f2/� S•J• v�� ot Q v O. Ham, to Q 1. ... . 27.Date of Birth 28.Age 29.Sex 30.Race 31.Ethnic 32.Handicap 33.Residence Status ❑Temp.Res.-Foreign Nat. ❑ M ❑ F ❑ White❑ Black❑Other ❑ Hispanic❑ Unk. ❑ Yes nx Resident ❑Tourist❑Student❑Other J j - ClU ❑ Indian ❑Asian❑ Unk. ❑Non-Hispanic ❑ No U Commuter❑Military ❑Homeless❑Unk 34.Type/No 35.Name(Last,First,Middle) 36.Alias/Nickname/Maiden Name(Last,First.Middle) 37.Apparent Condition K. Z ❑ Impaired Drugs ❑ Mental Dis ❑Unk. O ❑ Impaired Alco ❑Inj/111 ❑App Norm -_ N w 38.Address(Street No.,Street Name,Bldg.No.,Apt.No.,City,State,Zip) 39.Phone No. 40.Social Security No. Ii ❑ Home L. �p ❑ Work �-- w wN 41.Date of Birth 42.Age 43.Sex 44.Race 45.Ethnic 46.Skin 47.Occupation W ❑ M ❑ F ❑ White❑ Black❑Other ❑ Hispanic❑ Unk. ❑ Light ❑Dark ❑Unk. Mom-_ >cc ❑ U ❑ Indian❑Asian❑ Unk. ❑Non-Hispanic ❑Medium ❑Other cc tn.:( 48.Height L4I -1!1,ht 50.Hair 51.Eyes 52.Glasses 53.Build 54.Employer/School 55.Address N. Z ❑ Yes❑ Contacts ❑Small (-]Large rn ❑No ❑Medium 56.Scars/Marks/Tattoos(Describe) 57.Misc. ❑ 1 58.Victim or Property Property Quantity/ Make or -, Description Value Su ct Ng. Status i pe.- Meaiure Drug1 Model Serial No. p 2 F } a K 59.Vehicle 60.License Plate No Full 61.State 62.Ex Yr. 63.Plate T a Status ❑ p' YPe 64.Value ❑ O Partial❑ 5 K w a .65.Veh.Yr. 66.Make 67.Model 68.Style 69.VIN ❑ V_ 6 S W 70.Colo(s) 11. Towed By: 72.Vehicle Notes 7❑ TO: 73. / /J XD ? faj 1.It Z / 10 tt nc Q 12 Z 13 W, 74.Inquiries(Check all that apply) 75. NYSPIN Message No. 76.Complainant Signature B ❑ DMV ❑ Want/Warrant ❑ Scofflaw F El . istory ❑Stolen Property ❑Other use cover�. Q sheet �' 77 a in O i er Ign Lure d nk) 78 ID No 79.Supervisor's Signature(Include Rank) 80.1D No. 1- 84. tn Z C vvr a�g'- 81.Status ❑Open 1Pf Closed(If Closed,check box below) ❑Unfounded 82. Status Date 83. Notified7TOT of O ❑Vict.Refused to ,p ❑Arrest ❑Pros.Declined ❑ � Warrant Advised ❑�;,, ❑ [,fA Q CBI ❑Juv.-No Custody ❑Arrest-Juv. ❑Offender Dead ❑ ❑Extrad.Dechn Unknown (p I{KJ Pages DC)S-3205 (2/97) `FALSE STATEMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE AS A CRIME,PURSUANT TO THE NEW YORK STATE PENAL LAW. 'E15 1tS=20H0'Q2 -� FM J rr .�r�i�rrr cauri� TORE-� -1-"_ 2F-1- =tt_: 0-2:48F'M F4'YN ORIENT I_aUNdji-.:1' =TORE LTD. Ta f651.='15r, P.r'1 5 `856 I —.—. ---- --P t__- ROS-Y� TOP06RAPH I G MAC' - "THE ORIENT N} ARF 51TUT QRIENT . N TOM: 5OUTHOLP ,=; •-,�, F 5UFFOL•K=COUNTY, } SURVEYED OBI'-Db-GG i EL cV;;TlONS 5i lOWN }{ REGiv ARE j D , rr �_ <Er=Er2ENGED TO M.5•t�. NGVD'2a .•. , SUFFOLK GCUN TY TA-X 4 1000 -- If _ F ` 1 a.tip`- ;� �• ,`� i-_ Yt: ^'r .. J•ft �, lJ F.i%r7__ J:•_- - `/r, F AV :..,.... .. -«:.•a.r,::..»,»r,u.:m -,r - � LAND vQ - R,Fox 61-- JUVLW 6 FAST TVTAdN STREET N.Y.S.LIC. NO. 50202 ��r� � 'SU �Q bl t 0- P"'THE. � GRA j�r1G SGf I.E _ kTV al EAD,N.Y. 21901 - - - 369-SUS Fax 369 8287: I REF TIGEIZIPRGS�warPZ _ - - - -- ---- - ORIGINAL Town P�gUFFO(,� l -. Albert J. Krupski, President 53095 n Road Maia James King, Vice-President y� P.O. Box, Road Henry Smith 179 = Southold, New York 119.7.1. Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda �40 �� Telephone (516) 765-18g2 Fax(516) 765-1823_,_. _—_- BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~ LETTER OF REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT DATE APP,IL a a.00l OWNER p R,I V N-r R- CDILWAliq PHONE RTT'E T1 o N: I-I NT6 Ou F-W-1 RK;SI o Fm r ADDRESS p.•o..gdX a43 . o l;► MN-r Nit I I q 5'7 AGENT S F L P C R M I T c PHONE 3 tl V7_ 3 S�` S P•o • �o x 4� � T ADDRESS 5AST MARS 1,4 r I �g3q_oo �(o PROPERTY LOCATION U LLL&C F 14,Vd F k O k I E N T, L V l l qS`7 TAX MAP NO. L (DpC UWe 9 R j�S1-r W HAI&F C) . request an Amendment to Permit #171: rO REMOVE SL( PlLl/J65 FRaM WEST S IDE aF TIMBER Pl.l✓iZ IZEI.00ArTE_ rp NoRTF{ S IDE of SOLD SVKE_11zUcK III=P`. � Nsr�IZL l�Pl��oxlMATiv��( B•y P/L/N6S oty Sov"Cl� SIbE ol= > xlsrll-l� So�ID S�toN� Roc(L P ltv� . Signed By: - A w COPY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK WETLANDS PERMIT This Wetlands Permit No. .47.4............ has been granted by the Town Trustees according to information furnished in Application No...594 ...filed by Applicant.Orient Wharf„ MpjaA,y on .....11/16 R......... 19.......... A map of the proposed work will be kept on file in the Trustee Office under the application number given. Permit granted to do the following'work.....To,extend. . ..a..float.. . ..arrangement,5,Q!„by..44diAg„two ......... .. .. ... ...... 6' x 20' floats with 5-5' x 20' "T" floats anal 1; !„ �!„°�!; d to.,,..�sld................ _.......................... ...................................................... .. 8 pilings. ................................................................................................................................................................. Location of property on which work to be done.....Orient Harbors„Main„&, Kj� g.................... ............ .... ...... Street, Orient. ................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................. Creek, Bay or Harbor fronting property ....Orient Harbor ................................................................................................................................................................. .... ..Size of work: Length :.20' floats with 5 - 20 "T" and 1 -, ! ';T.!............................... ... ............................................................. Width ....2......,.6' floats with 5- . 5' 'IT" and 1 - 4' 'IT" Height Above High Water ----------- I ............................................................................................. ----------- DepthBelow Low Water ................................................................................................. Yardsto be Excavated..............n/a................................................................................. Yards to be Filled n/a Manner in which material is to be removed or deposited n/a . . ................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................. Intended use of property......Indust. ial rial ... ................................................................................................ Conditions if any........ .. ..-....-................................................................ ........... . .............. . ................................ . ................................................................................................................................................................. Expiration Date „Two years from-the date th}g..q.e jet„j j$Iy�d if .... ..... .... work has not 'commenced by Zsai date. Number of Inspections Required „ .. .........completion of the work. . ..... InspectionFees ....$10.00................................................................................. ................................. Liability Policies in the Amount of ....:::--------------------------- ......................................................................................... The validity of this permit is or may be subject to.the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The Town accepts no reso.bnsibility in applying for or obtaining such approval. In the .event that such approval is necessary, the holder of this permit shall not commence operations here- under until such approval has been obtained-in writing.The failure to obtain such other approval when reg6ired shall subject this permit to immediate revocation by the Trustees upon recejpt by the Trustees• of written notice from such other governmental or municipal authorities of its refusal or disapproval. Board of Trustees Application ORIGINAL COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: T6 ARM O R� =U RT l FBI C' (-s--I N 6 S L 0 1` 0 S` b Nl -k DA M hr. E Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? ►� No Yes ,N0 UECFt'A-r►oKJ Does the project involve excavation or filling? No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated?—(cubic yards) How much material will be filled?_ (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: p I i t\1 Cs k5 i L h E =WYCALLE D Lo IT 14 T64R6 EF1 I C P-A W F- Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) 1114E A-CTlU 1't�f ILL NDT CAUSE AN NE- GAIN E F—EF F &rS I IN ENvIRot-1 A-T R-K (A ) A-U Apr 25 01 11 : 45a Su p E. Long 516-477-3455 p. 2 Albert J.Krupski,President �OSVfFO(�-C Town Hall James King, Vice-President �O � �/ .53095 Route 25 Henry Smith a P.O.Box 1179 Artie Foster y Z Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ken Poliwoda Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631),765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Application - of r_Q j------------ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, !-1 hlTo w _1.1 residing at ORl RENT N u1 ' 0 2 1FC. being duly sworn, depose and say: th That on the J1 day of APRIL , 2001 , I personally posted the property known asr.01A NV by placing the Board of Trustees official post r where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of public h arinq.,�Daateof hearing noted thereon to be held he os,am M Cr OL18" '`�� Dated: signat e) Swo n to before me this a5'T' day of A?RIJ,- 2001 SUSAN E.LONG Notary Public,State of New York Ot AA ) _r: mNo.01 L04958343 Qualified e ru- Commission Novemb6 3eniNotary P Albert J. Krupski,President '� oSVFFO��C Town Hall James King,Vice-President �� ljy .53095 Route 25 Henry Smith o P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda `F Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ----------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of _ -W 00- -------------- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, J. Kevin McLaughlin , residing at 680 Old Orchard Lane, East Marion,' 'NY being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the 27th day of March , 2001 , I personally posted the property known as 2110 Village Lane, Orient, NY (SCTM #1000-024.00-02.00-028.001) by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public earl ng. D� te of hearing noted thereon to be held `Ic2s, o1mi MQUumu Dated: (si n ' ure) J. Ke n McLaughlin Sworn to before me this ZS day of April 2001 Not qjl Public ELIZABETH A STATHIS NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York No.01 ST6008173,Suffolk County Term Expires June 8,20�- / .3+ NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: Orient Wharf Co. SCTM#10 0 0- 02'4.00-02.00-028.001 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: Coastal; 1 . That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Erosion Permit from the Board of Trustees to: allow the existing 6.! x 8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment to remain until a safe water supply has been obtained. 2 . That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review- is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows : Orient Wharf Co. property commonly ]mown as 2110 Village Lane,00rient, NY SCTM #1000-024.00-02.00-028.001 3 . That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: 4/25/01 You' may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal . OWNERS NAME : Orient Wharf Co. MAILING ADDRESS • c/o J, Kevin McLaughlin, Esq., P.O. Box 1210,j .Southold, NY 11971 PHONE # : 631 765-6085 Enc . : ..Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: David & Claire L. Air #12B, 315 8th Avenue, New York, NY 10001 SCTM # 1000-024.00-02.00-027.000 Timothy T. Frost & Nina Frost Apt. #14-0, 233 East 69th Street, New York, NY 10021 SCTM #1000-026.00-01.00-001.001 and c/o Bay House, P.O. Box 636, Orient, NY 11957 Timothy T. Frost & Nina Frost Apt. #14-0, 233 East 69th Street, New.York, NY 10021 SCTM #1000-025.00-03.00-012.001 and c/o Bay House, P.O. Box 636, Orient, NY 11957 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK J. KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN , residing at 680 Old Orchard Lane, East Marion, New York being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of March. 2001 iddix , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at southold, New York , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (c ded) (registered) mail. Sworn to before me this day of Marcir, 2001 ,TSI� Notary Public ELIZABETH A STATHIS NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York No.01 ST6008173,Suffolk County Term Expires June 8,20-02— Albert J. Krupski, President �O5VFF0(�-C Town Hall James King, Vice-President �� OGy 53095 Route 25 Henry Smith o P.O. Box 1179 Artie Foster cn x Southold, New York 11971-0959 Ken Poliv;oda Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES ORIGINAL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only oroastal Erosion Permit Application _Wetland Permit Application Major Minor _Waiver/Amendment/Chan es deceived Application: (7 11.1-oreceived Fee:$ Inb .completed Application_ di _Incomplete SEQR.A Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted- Coordi nation:(date sent ... CAC Referral Sent: IN mate of Inspection: MI _Receipt of CAC Report:_ -Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: ,,-Y'ublic Hearing Held: 01 Resolution: Name of Applicant ATTE/yT'ro Iq - J—It,4 oN DUC--LL RF_- SIDE NT .Address -P.o , B O/Ic a4:1 oRI EWE , ��1� l tgsl Phone Number:( ) So31 3 a 3 a S8a SutT01k County Tax Map Number: 1000 - Aq— a — a$ Property Location: V l L.L Aa F LA H E 1 6 R IE2-' N 1 (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) .AGENT: S US A N E , I....O Nr. EjZ M ITS (If applicable) Address: 'p.D , B 6 J(e EA-sr HARW N NQ tN3 -oo (� --- -- ------Phone: (o 3_1 Boar ,of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York O N BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID. PERMIT(S) , IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT( S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S) , TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF � ,-rg Notary Public CLAIRE L.GLEW Notary Public,State of New York No.OIGL4879505 Qualified in Suffolk Co )4�� Commission Expires Dec.8,32K)-v 7 AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: oo I, �/ (name) (street address) located at /�/�//��L- / — do hereby give Susan E. Long (town & state) Permits the authority to act as agent on my behalf in applying for all necessary permits for work to be done on my property described above. Si x . . ,r i APR 2 32001 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address : i o. ►ENT -r i Postal iCERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (DomesticU.S.Postal Service Only, ided)- (Domestic Mail only, Article'Sent To: Lr) EW YOf;K: NY 10oo1 co I cow co NEW YORK, NY 10021 UNIT ID' ru Postage $ / 0.34 U M 1.90 / Stisn ru Postage $ 3 Certified Fee 1.90 Certified Fee p. Retum Receipt Fee ` to Cr (Endorsement Required) I re (n Retum Receipt Fee �i � 0 1:: K Q' S ere J� y (Endorsement Required) O� O Restricted Delivery Fee C3 - 2t : KHGNS p (Endorsement Required) I3 Restricted Delivery Fee 04/14 hQ , `�`a p (Endorsement Required) O Total Postage&Fees APR 3 [I)�,�b1,,,-�N 0 $ fU Total Postage&Fees, rU Name(Please Print Clearly)(To be completed by mailer) ru -� e P - ftl ) C h11 A Name(Pleas ri t clearly)(To be com leted 6 mailer) rl Street,Apt.No.;or PO Box No. ------------------- Street,---4► Apt.No.;or PO Bo o. �'�` 1-` Er clry,srare,zrP+a o a3 __ AsT.--t'--------SSRET P__T..= r` BLS D 1� N I b o p cl state,ZIP+4 E; olZk —N I 00 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK VAU l_ BAY.-E— , residing at M< DFoZD Mew �oP, --- , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the t3'('h day of PpRIL, ,61GO deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at -AST HhE10 , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. Sworn to before me this J-h day of _A IK IL, ,�.®0�_ -.. SUSAN E.LONG Notary Public,State of New York "n� >ENO.OI L04�958343 Qualified in Suffolk CountV Commission xpires Novemberber 6,1= Notary Public NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: ORIE I- W V+hRr CoMPANI SCTM#1000- A�- ,2 - a8. 1 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1 . That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: REMEsVE_ 6-4 ? KINGS FRoH LEE 'T 51DF- of TIMQGR PIED, Alb REl,0e_hTF_ To Nor-TIJ 5 I bF- of SOLID STONF-I R6C1-- PIER. XMsrALL APP1Z0)(1 HnTI_L $4 P(LINCS ON SOUTH SIDE of I~X1ST1NC SOLIp STo HE.I ROCK. PtEtz, ' 2 . That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review--is located adjacent to your property and ia. described as follows : o'KIEN'T WHARF C6MPA►q VILLAGE L-APF— OR 1 E NT I NN I IIS7 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32 , 37 , or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: y-aS-off You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal . OWNERS NAME: OtilENr WRARF! Cotgn- MAILING ADDRESS : CJp SOSAM E, . I-on[6�PERMas e _C(3q-06 V4 PHONE #: !a31 q7' 345- Enc. : Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. s --z move piiM w�saea°t'vmbe*pis e n l� Harbor >>e (log fat) N W1 �E Fixed �O S 3 / Tkr,ber Y LL S D eddy Floots mf{� Cttp�"'' a LL LL // / x Floot o ♦ osls // L x ------------------- \ pytr 011 PSG// _ ah wm. Frome Building m Q)Y �ar6a D ��u;`�(�It E ] [II 1 1 r:m]er y,ed ' Asphalt Surface over Stone Pier J—Pier • Deck on i ' ee --------------- \ \` platrorm ahrm.�/ �� ♦ \ a.lyam. \ ♦ \ `v\ die'.'PProt ♦ ♦ \ ylG �P1� \ ♦ ` Pier 4QQ Prepared for: \ ` Orient Wharf Company q ` (GrifI nt , Village Lane �♦\, ;°� P.O.Box 243 ` Orient,NY 11957 Proposed: Remove 54 pilings from west o ` side of timber pier and relocate to nortli side Scale 1" =40' `\ of solid rock(stone pier. Install aproximately 84 Prepared by ` pilings on south side of existing solid rock(stone Susan E.Long Permits pier. Pilings to be placed immediately adjacent P.O.Box to each other to armor and fortify the existing 46 rock/stone pier against storm waves and ice damage East Marion,NY 11939-0046 (631)477-3455 Page 1 ir March 31,2001 14.16•4(2187)—Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C SEC State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) t. APPLICANT/SPONSOR I 2. PROJECT NAME 7. PROJECT LOCATION: Municlpallty County A. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc.,or provide map) AKF_A �.H.bWN , OIi pRl3TECT pLE}NS rAMOUNT SED ACTION: w ❑Expansion ZModiflcation/alteration PROJECT BRIEFLY; Qr F LAND AFFECTED: — tJ — acres Ultimately cres POSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTINGdLAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ❑No If No,describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? I Residential ❑Industrial 0 Commercial I I Describe: ❑Agriculture L I Park/Forest/Ooen space U Otner wAT l=R F Iv o r�T" 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,6R=PU7&", NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL. STATE OR LOCAL)? &Yes ❑No If yes,list agency(s)and permit/approvals �lys bE C r l��M�J CUKPS / 56UTRNj) `TOWN `rl`USTa=F_S 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? s I]Yes �No If yes,list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OOFr PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE -MODIFICATION? ❑Yes kv Nb I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Cli SIN 1 w G p Date: 3 ,i Signature: If the action'is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this a.Uedsment OVER ' 1 PART II—ENVIRONMENTA I_, AFSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency!._ _ A. DOES AC"ION Err:��i10EED ANY THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12? If ye- �rotnate the review rocess and use the FULL �-AF ❑Yes a No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 5 NYCRR, PART 3t1.5? II No. a negative Cec:arai:, mra—ytoe superseded by another involved agency. LJ Yes ❑No C: COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may oe handwritten. if legioie) C1. Existing air quality, surface or'groundwater quality or Quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste oroduc:ion or dlsccs. potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic,or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain brie CJ. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellflsh or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Exotain orletly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain or.. C5. Growin, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain oriefly. CS. Long term, short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in Ct•C57 Explain briefly. I -7. Otner impacts(Including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. � t �. :S THERE. OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? _Yes ❑No If Yes. explain briefly I PART III—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it Is substantial,large,important or otherwise slgnif c: Eacn effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occuring; (c) duration: irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately accressec. Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts whicn MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive-declaration. Check this box if you have determined, based on the Information and analysis above and any sucoorting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in-,-�ny significant adverse environmental Irncac;s AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination; .NWire of lead A4ency e F,nt w I roe-Njme or Ke)ponsiole Uincer in Luad AgenCy r,oe of Kesoonsioie 0iticer i I )i4nature or Kesoonsible Oincet in Leda Agency Signature of Vreparer tit dwerent irom resoom,o,e orr-cen 2 Town Hall Albert J.Krupski,President Q•� l/,y 53095 Main Road James King,Vice-President oft P.O.Box 1179 Henry Smith y = Southold,New York 11971 Artie Foster W Ken Pohwoda Gy Telephone(516) 765-18,92 �O( � Fax(516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only X Coastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland Permit Application Grandfather Permit Application Waiver/Amendment/C ancres ✓Received Application: 0 Received Fee:$9 /Completed Application Incomplete SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted 9 Coordination: (date s nt MAR I we-CAC Referral Sent: wDate of Inspection: Receipt of CAC Repor • Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: yublic Hearing Held: Resolution: Name of Applicant Orient Wharf Co. Address 2110 Village Lane, P.O. Box 243, Orient, NY 11957 Phone Number: ( ) Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 024.00-02.00-028.001 Property Location• 2110 Village Lane, Orient, NY 11957 (see annexed survey) (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) ► AGENT• J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esq. (If applicable) Address• P.O. Box 1210, Southold, NY 11971 Phone: 765-6085 FAX#: 765-1856 1 ►ard of Trustees Applicati, GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet) : (see annexed survey) Area Zoning: Previous use of property: wharf, docks & yacht club building Intended use of property: same, with additionaof existing 61' x 8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment. Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date Southold Town Trustees (Wetlands 4/23/87 Permit #482) No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary) : existing 61 x 81 shed housing necessary water filtration equipment to remain on the wharf as long as the filtration system is required to obtain a safe water supply. 2 -zrd of Trustees Applicatic- COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity• to allow the existing 6' x 8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment o remain as long as necessary in order o assure a safe water supply. Are wetlands present within 75 feet of the proposed activity? No Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? X No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? N/A (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? N/A (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: N/A Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if' necessary) None. Tle,__.existing temporary, portable 6.1` x 8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment has been placed on top of the existing wharf, which has been in place for over 100 years. 4 __ ,)ard of Trustees Applicat County of Suffolk State of New York Linton Duell, as President of Orient Wharf Co. BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS .ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S) , IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT( S) OR REPRESENTATIVES( S) , TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF March, 2001. otar y Public J. KE yN MCLAUG11LIN otary Public, State of New York Qualified in Albany County My C mmissioii Expire i 7 .. �h•N 14-16-d(2/67)—Text 12 PROJECT 1.0. NUMBER 617.21 SEC Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Orient Wharf:=Co. f Coastal Erosion Permit 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municlpallty Orient county Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map), .. 2110 Village Lane, Orient, New York . SCTM #1000-024.00-02.00-028.001 MAC 19 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: �1 E I New ❑Expansion M Modification/alteration ' 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Coastal Erosion Permit to allow existing 6' x 8' she housing necessary water filtration equipment to remain until a safe water supply is obtained. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres 3. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? LYes ❑No If No,describe briefly 1 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? rr--; Residential ❑.!ndusirial Commercial U Agriculture L✓Park/ForesVOoen space L—I Other Describe: Mix of residential and marine activities 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? Yes G No If yes.list agency(s)and permitlapprovals applicant is in the process of obtaining all necessary approvals from NYS DEC 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT QR APPROVAL? r ®Yes' ❑No It yes,list aoency name and permit/approval esisting Southold Town Trustees Permits 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes UN6 I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Orient Wharf Co. Date: 3/1 / 01 Signature: 1 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state acency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this azessment OVER y PART SSE SSMEN i,o be CCrncietec by 'Agenc- .4. DOES AC-iCN =:CCE=D :N' �E r-nRESnOLJ IN o vYC=n, P:,nT 517..Z. It y 7cralnate :he review :rocess and use the =OJL_ °AR. Yas !No E. WILL ACT;CN REC:EiVE -CCRCINAT'c:)REVIEW AS?RCVICE7 =:R UNUSTED ACTICNS iN S NYCRR, ?ART j17,77, if .`1o, a negative _ec:ara may be suberseCec by anct.er Involved agency. L Yes 7 `No I C. CCULD ACTJCN RESULT iN ANY ADVERSE O7==—C S ASSCC:A7=-D WITH TnE FOLLOWING: 'Answers may ce iancwratten. if :ey^iblet I C1. casting air cuatity, surface or'grounawater cuality or cuantity, noise ievels. existing :rafflc patterns, sotiC waste prccuc:icn or biscc potential for erosion, :ralnage or'lancing oroolems?E%olain briefly. Cl— Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological,historic, or other natural or cultural resources: or community or neignecrnood c.:aracter? Explain CZ. Vegetation or fauna, `Isn. sneilfisn or wildlife species, significant haoitats, or threatened or encangered scec:es? Explain brleily: C,. A community's existing plans or goals as offlcmily aaooted,or a change in use or intensity or use of!and or other natural resources?Exolain c: CS. Growth, suoseduent :evetooment,or related activities likely to be induced by the brecosed action? Exofafn briefly. i CS. Lang :arm, snort :errs.emulative,or other effects not identified in C1-CS? =xotain nriefly. J'. Ctner imoac:s iinc.ic:ng _..anges in use of either quantity or type or energy)? .-xolaln brieily. i �. :S 'nEFE. :;R !S THERE ::KE Y TC SE.C:NTAOVE=SY RELATE-0 TO ?CITE-NTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONME JTAL il:P.ACTS? Yes _No ;f Yes. exclain briefly — ?ART III—OETcRMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified aCove,determine whether it is substantial,large, imconant or otherwise signific. Each effect snould be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b).probanility of occaing; (c) durations irreversibility; (e) geograonic scoce: and (f) magnitude:If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. censure excianations contain sufficient detail to snow that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately acdressec- Check :his box if you have identified one or more aotentially large or Significant acverse impacts which !4:Y occur. Then proceed directly to ;he FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive-declaration. i Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any sucoortinc i documentarian. :hat :he proposed action ';DILL .JOT result in_3ny significant adverse environmental imcac,Z AND prcvice on attacriments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: i i .N-ow of LCJU Agency i i !rant -it :vac Nome 71 (epQcfn%i Oie;)IfiCer:n Lcaa AgCnC7 rifle of r(e:0on uale Officer I ;it;nJtute•JI ieiconiioie'_I;Icef�n Leja Agency Jit;nd:Ure Jr IoTYJ.1(CI tit .71f:rrenf :ram reipan5101e Oil 1C irl ' Jatc 7 , A 14-'6•4(2/87)—Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 SEC Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Orient Wharf;-Co. I Coastal Erosion Permit 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Orient county Suffolk A. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road Intersections, prominent landmarks, etc.,or provide map) 2110 Village Lane, Orient, New York . SCPM #1000-024.00-02.00-028.001 MAR 9 211�1) 5. IS P�rR--Ott POSED ACTION: !J New ❑Expansion IN Modiffcatlon/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: COAStal Erosiol(1 Permit to allow existing 61 x 81 shed ousing necessary water filtration equipment to remain until a safe water supply is obtained. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: . Initially acres Ultimately acres WILL =90POSE�D^ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? 12Yes ❑No If No,describe briefly i l 9. WHAT 15 PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? I LURes+dential Clndustrial Commercial ❑Agriculture L:ParklForesVOoen space 0Other Describe: Mix of residential and marine activities 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAU? 91 Yes ❑No If yes,list agency(s)and permitlapprovais applicant is in the process of obtaining all necessary approvals from NYS DEC tt. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VAUD PERMIT QR APPROV L? 9)Yes' ❑No If yes, list agency name and permit/approval eSlsting gouthold Town Trustees Permits 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REOUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes UNo I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE applicantlsponsor name: Orient Wharf Co. Date: 3/1 y/ 01 Signature: 7 If the action.is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this a.g,�essment OVER 1 PART II—ENVIRONMENT" 'gCESSME"J i o be comcleted by Agenc' ^ . OCES ACT;CN =_XCEcG ANY T 4:.ESrGLO IN 3 NYCRR, ?SRT 5<17..Z. it yes. unate me review =roces3 and use the FUL_ Z-AF. "es I`No E. 'NICE ACTlCN RE•,:EiVE'.CCRGINi.,c]RE'/IFN AS?P.CVIGED=Cri UNL•STED ACTiCNS iN o NYCRR, PART 7i7.57 it!lo.a negaL:ve=ec:are Tay me suoer3ecac my another involved agency. I 7.yes Lr NO I C. CCULD ACTiCN RESULT iN ANY ADVERSE=FFEC,S ASSCC:AT'eD WITH, t£FOLLOWING; 'An3Wers may ce nancurntten. it :egldiel I C1. cxistmg air quality, surface or'groundwater quality or quantity, noise :eveis, existing :rattle :attems. sonic Neste prccuc:lcn or disc: potential for eraston. drainage or!Ioocing proolems?E.--lain Srietly. M Aesthetic, agricultural, arcna®ological,historic,dr other natural or cultural resources:or community or neignoern000 cnaracteR Emoiain w. Vegetation or sauna. llsn. srellfisn or wildlife species, significant haoitats,or threatened or enCangered scenes? Exclaim oneily. Cs. A cgmmunity's existing plans or goals as officially aeooted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain c: iC5. Growth, suoseauent deveicoment.or related activities likely to de induced my the -rcoosec action? Explain arlefly. I I l I C.S. :qng :erm, snore, ;erm.cumulative,or other ertems not identified in Ct•C57 Exotain 7riefly. i Ctner imoac:s Oncwc:ng :nanges in use of either quantity or type or energy)? Exotam 7rietly. .1 ;5 'SERF_ CR IS THERE _:KELY To 3E CCNTA0VERSY RELATED To POTENTIAL ACVSRSE =NVIRONMENTAL:MP.ACTS7 Yes _No if Yes. exclain orietly I ' I . ?ART III—OET ERMINATION OF SiGNiFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified acove.determine whether it is substantial.large,important or otherwise signi tic Eac i effect snould be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b).probaoility of occayng; (c) duration irreversibility:(el geograonic scoce:and (n magnitude.It necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure exetanations contain sufficient detall to snow that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adecuateiy aceressec. Check ;his box if you have identified one or more potentially large or Significant adverse imoac.s which - — occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive-declaration, i Chec:c this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supoortinc i doc rnentation. :hat :he proposed action WILL NOT result in-4ny significant adverse environmental imcac:. AND provide an attac:iments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: i i `i..nte no .rdu A gencv i r !nnt Lit :vor Name ai ce con Note t)iticrf:n Ludo AtirnC7 :itle of ausOOns.oie a)ItiCef i :rynJture Or trlconatole•_RKtr in:raO.1GrnCy )itinature or rr.'C0.1rer tit liiferent :rom resocinsicie orr.cefi r� Jle 2 APPLICANT s. 1NSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORk The Town of Southold ' s Code of Ethics gkohibibs conflicts of _merest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of Interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAHB s Linton Duell, as President of Orient Wharf Last name , first name► m dd•le n t al , unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person ' s or company ' s name . ) NATURE ,. ;'•�:.rr. ,. `%:t,.::. Olt APPLICATION: (Check all that apply. ) Tax grievance Variance Change of zone MAR 1 9 Appipwal of plat Exemption from plat or official map other x ( If ,Other, " name the activity. ) Coastal Erosion Permit- through Southold Town Trustees Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship vitli any officer or employee of the Tovn of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business Interest" means a business, including a partnersitipp in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered OYES, ". complete the balance of this farmand date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant ) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her apouse,• sibling, parent , or child is (check all that apply ) t A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant' is a corporation) ! B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a noncorporate 'entity (when the applicant in not a corporation) ; C) an officer, director, partner, or amployee. of the applicant ) or D) the actual applicant . DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONS111P i•j•I . Submitted this dily Of h,. t 2ddi: W Signature. r iri on Dte -Print name 1 ,�p; d Orzent ii t .. . . .; •i•. v.w�''i't i�n;'`1a�N��i.»,..;.'.'•.J.��IW„, t,.;►.+4:� i I R L, ��SIlFFO,�'Yc Albert J.Krupski,President Town Hall ti•Z.� �Gy 53095 Main Road James King,Vice-President o P.O.Box 1179 Henry Smith W Southold,New York 11971 Artie Foster p Ken Poliwoda y �� Telephone(516) 765-1892 Fax(516) 765-1823 i_ --0 Wes. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ) Z 3 LETTER OF REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT DATE Jur)e 23' 2000 OWNER Orient Wharf Co. PHONE (631') 323-1337 .. ,,ADDRESS .,P.O. Box 2.43., Orient, NY 11957 AGENT J• Kevin McLaughlin PHONE (631 ) 765-6085 ADDRESS P.O. Box 1210, Southold, NY 11971 PROPERTY LOCATION 2110 Village Lane, Orient, . NY TAX MAP NO. 1000-024.00-02 .00-028 .001 I/We J. Kevin McLaughlin request an Amendment to Permit# 474 (a copy of which is annexed hereto) to allow the existing 6 ' x 8 ' shed, which houses necessary water filtration equipment to remain on the wharf, as long as the filtration yst i requ ' ed in order�.to .obtain a potable water supply Sign y: J. e i cLaughlin, Agent A - rd of Trustees Applicatio r County of Suffolkp juN 3 State of New York J. Kevin McLaughlin . BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S) , IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT( S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S) , TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WI REVIE F THIS APPLICATION. ignature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS � AY OF June, 2000 �Y9 tary Public ELIZABETH A STATHIS NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York No.01 ST6008173,Suffolk County Tenn Expires June 8,20SaX. 7 - ,� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOIYN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK WETLANDS PERMIT This Wetlands Permit No. ...74............ has been granted by the Town Trustees according to Orient Wharf information furnished in Application No. ..594............ filed b A licant �Qmpazxy 11/16/87 ..... on .. 19.......... A map of the proposed work will be kept on file in the T.rusta_e Office under the application number given. To extend a float a-rran ement 50' b wo Permit granted to do the following work .......................x.addi�.g..k 6' x 20' floats with 5-5' x 20' "T" floats and 1- .................................................... ..!.. .. '...'.'.7C".. ztd.....°.....a.dd................ 8 pilings. ................................................................................................................................................................. Orient Harbor Main & K' Location of property on which work to be done ....r.................... ?fig.......................... ,Street, Orient. ................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................. ::::• Creek, Say or Harbor fronting property .....Orient Harbor .........................................: ........................................................................................................................................................... ..... Size of work: Length .... ..:.201, floats with 5 - 20 'IT" and 1 - �.."T!!,,,,,,. Width 2 - 6' floats with 5- 5' "T" and 1 - 4' "T" Height Above High Water .................................................... ----------- - DepthBelow Low Water ............................... Yards to be Excavated n/a Yards to be Filled n/a n/a Manner in which material is to be removed or deposited Intended use of property n ustrial Conditionsif any ....................................................................... .......................................................................... ................................................................................... { Two - ears from the date th Expiration Date ............ :.....:......:.............................q..8Pfi1 ..1 .. lied.?:...................................::. work has not 'commenced by i date. Plumber of Inspections Required ..........�rus tee s„are,to„be,noti, �d..]t�0�fi...................... .... completion of the work. ""' InspectionFees .... .=.0.0 .................................................................................................... ............... •Liability Policies in the ,Amount of ....:..::::------------------------ ....................................... The validity of this permit is or may be subject to the approval of.other governmental or municipal authorities. The Town accept! no respbnsibility- in applying for or obtaining such approval. In the event that such 'approval is necessary, the: holder of this permit shall not commence .operations here- under until such ipproval has been obtained in writing. The failure to obtain such other-approval when required shall subiact.,this permit to immediate revocation by the Trustees upon receipt by the Trustees• of v:ritten notice from such other governmental or municipal authorities of its refusal .or disapproval P ' f I TOWN OF SOUTHOU BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN SOUTHOLD, NEW YOR r WETLANDS PERMIT p l • I • f This Wetlands Permit No. .474............ has been granted byl information furnished in Application No. ,,594............ filed by Applicant .Orient Wharf,Qmpamy ........................................ on .....11/16/87,,,,,,,,, 19,,,,,,,,,, A map,of the proposed work will be kept on file in the Trustee Office under the application number given. Permit granted to do the following'work .....To, extend a float arranyement„50!,....by„a.,ddjmg„kwo ........................................ 6' x '20' floats with 5-5' x 20' "T" floats.and...1.- ' " " ................................................................................. ....... ...5.'.. ... .... ................. ..�.... xxd...tO..... dd ....pilings.............................. ........... . ..............................: . .......................................................... Location of property on which work to be done ....,Orient Harbor?,.Main„&,;King,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ...Street ..Orient. ...................................... ...... ..................... ....... .......................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................. Creek, Bay or Harbor fronting property ,,,,Orient Harbor ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 - 20' floats with 5 - 20 "T" and 1 - ' Size of work: Length ��T 11 ................................................................................. .......................................... 2 - 6' floats *with 5- - 5' "T" and 1 - 4' "T" Width ............................................................................................................................. ----------- HeightAbove High Water a ............................................................................................. DepthBelow Low Water ...............................:................................................................. Yardsto be Excavated ..............n/a................................................................................ Yards to be Filled n/a ......................................................................................................... Manner in which material is to be removed or deposited ..n/a ..... . .. ...:............................................... ...................:.............................................................................................................................................. Intended use of property .....Industrial pP Y ........................................................................ .................... .:.................................................................................................................................................. ........... --=------------ Conditionsif any ..................................................................................................................................... .......:......................................................................................................................................................... Expiration Date ,.Two..year.s --th th..from e...........date„t . ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, _. .... .................. work has not -commenced by pi4 date. Number of Inspections Required .............rustees„are„tq„bg,r}o �,fj,�d„�pp ,,,, completion of the work. InspectionFees ....$10.00................... .................................................................................................. -'Liability Policies in the Amount of ....:::-:::::::------------------- The'validity of this permit is or may be subject to.the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The Town accepts no respbnsibility-in applying for or obtaining such approval. In the event that such approval is necessary, the holder of this permit shall not commence .operations here- under until such approval has been obtained-in writing. The failure to obtain such other-approval when required shall subject. this permit to immediate revocation by the Trustees upon recejpt by the Trustees• of written notice from such other governmental or municipal authorities of its refusal or disapproval. b NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: The Orient Wharf Co. SCTM#1000- 024.00-02.00-028 .001 t^U Ar E HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: I . That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to:grant an Amendment to Permit #474 to allow . the existing 6' x 8' shed, which houses necessary water filtration equipment to remain on the wharf, as long as the filtration system is required in order to obtain a potable water supply. 2 . That the property which is the subject of Environmental -Review is located adjacent to your property -and is described as f o,I lows ; 2110 Village Lane, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-024.00-02.00=028.001 3 . That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on:" 7 19/00 You may contact the Trustees Office at 765 -1892 or in writing. The above referenced proposal is under review of the Board of `trustees of tale Town of Southold and does not reference any oth( r agency that night have to review same proposal. Ci7NER NAME• Orient Wharf Co. MAILING ADDRESS : %o T. K -yin Mc augh1 in, Agent P.O. Box 1210, Southold, NY 11971 PHONE #: (631) 765-6085 Enc. : Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: David & Claire L. Air #12B, 315 8th Avenue, New York, NY 10001 SCTM #1000-024.00-02 .00-027.000 Timothy T. Frost & Nina Frost Apt. #14-0, 233 East 69th Street, New York, SCTM #1000-026.00-01 .00-001 .001 NY 10021 Timothy T. Frost & Nina Frost Apt. #14-0, 233 East 69th Street, New York, SCTM #1000-025.00-03 .00-012.001 NY 10021 STATE OF NEW YORK CCUNTY OF SUFFOLK _J. Kevin McLaughlin , residing at680 Old Orchard Lane, East Marion, being duly sworn, deposes and says '_: t o,.': the 23rd day of June, 2000 x deponent mailed ; L�ue copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the +:rL,��,c:_ =et Opposite the names of said persons are the audrass of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town • f Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the Urilt d States Post Office at Southold, NY that s Noti s were mailed to each of said persons b ( ti i d) (r gis a ed) mail. J. Ke 1h Mc Sworn to before me this -9- day of June, 2000 � �gx Notary Public ELIZABETH A STATHIS NNo.ORST600817,State of New York 3,Suffolk County Term Expires June 8.20a L- 6 TO �)6RAFH I G MAP ' "THE ORIE' NT Y4HARP 51TUATE: ORIENT TONN: 5OUTHO D . SUFFOLK GOUN 1Y, NY i �`N �r r'_. 14��._ _ ' f f X�� -=�I�n i�i'`�� ii`i'� :=Y"C=✓\ rl:RE � � � ►JUN 2 3 71 - 1 f ®��SVF��(,�C� Town Hall Albert J.Krupski, President �a Gy 53095 Main Road James King,Vice-President• P.O.Box 1179 Henry Smith Southold,New York 11971 Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda: Telephone(516) 765-1892. Fax(516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD j MAY 3 1 2000 �'rr L E,=OF REQ JEST FOR A NVAIN ER TO ki" vrh DATE May 31 , 2000 OWNERThe Orient Wharf Co- PH0�.E (631 ) 323-1337 ADDRESS p'0. .Box 243 ,- Orient, NY 1"1.957 AGENT J. Kevin McLaughlin PFIONF ( 631 ) 765-6085 ,ADDRESS P.O. Box 1210, Southold, NY 11971 PIRC'RE.RTVT,OCAT1Dr; 2110 Village Lane, Orient, NY TAX MAP NO. 1000-024.00-02 .00-028.001 .!/We J. Kevin McLaughlin _ request a Vlaivert0 allow the existing shed, which houses necessary water filtration equipment to remain on the wharf. Sign y: J. ,K MCLAUG IN, Agent Boars if 'Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York J. Kevin McLaughlin, as agent for The Orient Wharf Co. BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S) , IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S) , TO ENTER ON PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION W .T REV EW O THIS APPLICATION. J K 4 i S au'gr'A i n SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 31s ' OF May, 2000 x�a N tary Public ROBERT I. SCOTT/ewl Notary Public,State ofork Qualified in Suffolk County No.01SC47250$9 Term Expires May 31. COQp ) 7 rr. Town Hall Albert J. Krupski,President ; �?�� 53095 Main Road James King,Vice-President P.O.Box 1179 Henry Smith Southold,New York 11971 Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda " �y �'� Telephone(516) 765-18'92 Fax(516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTH:OLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ----------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of COUNTY OF SUFFOLxr.) STATE OF NEW YOR:K) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, J. KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN , residing at 680 Old Orchard Lane, East Marion, NY 11939 being duly sworn, depose and say: "--_ That on the:8th day of June, 200p99 I personally posted the property known as 2110 village Lane, orient, NY..(SCTM.#1000-024.00-02.00-028.001) byplacing the Board of Trustees official foster where it can easily be seen., and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing. (date of hearing noted thereon to be held lung �1� e�d �r Mt* I:Co PM , Dated: June 2000 ,7 siqhkt re)KEV M UGHLIN wor.r� to before me this it S day of June, 2000 lax. Notary Fublic �LA1�E�.GLEW NotaryNPoua01GSwte79505 York aual16i in DeclB� Commission Exp 0 NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: The Orient Wharf Co. SCTM#1000_ 024.00-02 .00-028 .001 YOU ARE HEREBY GI`IEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned. to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: Request is .being made for a Waiver to allow the existing shed, which houses necessary water filtration equipment to remain on the wharf as presently exists. 2 . That the property which is the subject of Environmental .Review is located adjacent to your property -and is described as follows : 2110 Village Lane, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-024.00-02 .00-028 .001 3 . That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: 6/21/00 You may contact the Trustees Office at 7v3-18_c2 or in writing. The above _r_eferenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other age-icy that might have to review same proposal. l OWNERS _NAME : Orient Wharf Co. _ MKILLNG ADDRESS . c/o j. Kevin McT,aughlin, Agent P.O. Box 1210, Southold, NY 11971 PHONE #: (631 ) 765-6085 Enc. : Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. V r PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: David & Claire L. Air #12B, 315 8th Avenue, New York, NY 10001 SCTM # 1000-024.00-02 .00-027.000 Timothy T. Frost & Nina Frost Apt. #14-0, 233 East 69th Street, New York, SCTM #1000-026. 00-01 .00-001 .001 NY 10021 Timothy T. Frost & Nina Frost Apt. #14-0, 23 East 69th Street, New York, NY 10021 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK _J. Kevin McLaughlin residing at 680 Old Orchard Lane, East Marion, _New_York 11939 , being duly sworn, deposes and says t�iat. c'.i :he3 Y s _ day of May, 2000 x _ deponent mailed a '_-rua copy of the; IVotine set f Lartb in the Board of Trus'-ees 1:::pli ation, dire(:}ed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set ,ppos.i--e there respective names; that the -_dresses `st the names of sa.;.d persons are LhN 3jcj':PcS -: :.:.,a per,'z.o—As as, Shown on the current assessment roll of the of Southoic; that said. Novices were mailed the United Sates Pose Gffice at Southold, New York tha s Noti were mailed to each of said persons y c r-t' . ed) rX mail. i Sworn to befor me this 31 st . day of Ma 000 "x Notary Public ROBERT I.S , JR. Notary Public,St of New York Qualified in Suffolk County No.01 SC4725089- Term Expires May 31, 6 0$QFFQ��C JEAN W. COCHRAN Supervisor GREGORY F.YAKABOSKI Su hQ.� l/ p TOWN ATTORNEY C Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 ti P.O. Box 1179 O � MARY C.WILSON a Southold, New York 11971-0959 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY y�Q! �aO� Telephone (631) 765-1889 Fax(631) 765-1823 E-mail: townattorney@southold.org OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY_ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD i DEC 2 1 2000 December 20,2000 Al Krupski,President Southold Town Trustees 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 RE: water filtration equipment shed Dear Mr. Krupski: You questioned whether a 6' by 8' shed which houses water filtration equipment located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area is permitted by the Southold Town Code. According to the Code,once it has been established that the land in question is situated within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area, a determination then must be made whether the real property in question is within one of the sub-areas designated as: the structural hazard area,nearshore area,beach area, dune area or bluff area. Each of the sub-areas is defined with in the Code at §37-6. If the wharf area in question is within the"structural hazard area" as defined in the Code, it appears the water filtration shed is permitted provided it can be considered a movable structure as required by §37-13. However, if the real property in question is located in what is defined as"nearshore area" or what is defined as"beach area" in the Code, all development is prohibited unless otherwise provided for in the Coastal Erosion Hazard. I hope this clarifies the Code. Please feel free to contact our office if there any questions. Sincerely 1 M C. ilson Assistant Town Attorney Town of Southold POCodebook for Windows § 37-6. Definitions. The following terms, as used in the chapter, shall have the meanings indicated, unless the context clearly requires otherwise: ADMINISTRATOR-- The local officials responsible for administrating and enforcing this chapter. The Southold Town Board of Trustees is hereby designated as the "Administrator." BEACH-- The zone of unconsolidated earth that extends landward from the mean low-water line to the waterward toe of a dune or bluff, whichever is most waterward. Where no dune or bluff exists landward of a beach, the landward limit of a beach is one hundred(100) feet landward from the place where there is a marked change in material or physiographic form or from the line of permanent vegetation, whichever is most waterward. Shorelands subject to seasonal or more frequent overwash or inundation are considered to be "beaches." BLUFF --Any bank or cliff with a precipitous or steeply sloped face adjoining a beach or a body of water. The waterward limit of a bluff is the landward limit of its waterward natural protective feature. Where no beach is present,the waterward limit of a bluff is mean low water. The landward limit is twenty-five (25) feet landward of the receding edge or, in those cases where there is no discernible line of active erosion,twenty-five (25) feet landward of the point of inflection on the top of the bluff. The "point of inflection" is that point along the top of the bluff where the trend of the land slope changes to begin its descent to the shoreline. COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA MAP -- The final map and any amendments thereof issued by the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, which delineates boundaries of coastal erosion hazard areas subject to regulation under this chapter. COASTAL WATERS -- Long Island Sound and its connecting water bodies,bays, harbors, shallows and marshes. COASTLINE -- The lands adjacent to the Town of Southold's coastal waters. DEBRIS LINE --A linear accumulation of waterborne debris deposited on a beach by storm induced high water or by wave action. DUNE --A ridge or hill of loose, windblown or artificially placed earth, the principal component of which is sand. EROSION-- The loss or displacement of land along the coastline due to the action of waves, currents, wind-driven water, waterborne ice or other impacts of storms. It also means the loss or displacement of land due to the action of wind, runoff of surface waters or groundwaters, or groundwater seepage. 1 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows of sand, gravel and other unconsolidated material for beaches. Sandbars, which are located in nearshore areas, control the orientation of incoming waves and promote the development of ice cap formations which help protect shorelines during winter storms. The roots of aquatic vegetation in nearshore areas bind fine grained silts, clays and organic matter to form a fairly cohesive bottom that resists erosion. The following restrictions apply to regulated activities in nearshore areas: A. Excavating, grading, mining or dredging which diminishes the erosion protection afforded by nearshore areas is prohibited, except construction or maintenance of navigation channels, bypassing sand around natural and man-made obstructions and artificial beach nourishment, all of which require a coastal erosion management permit. B. Clean sand or gravel of an equivalent or slightly larger grain size is the only material which may be deposited within nearshore areas. Any deposition will require a coastal erosion management permit. C. All development is prohibited in nearshore areas unless specifically provided for by this chapter. § 37-15. Beach area. Beaches buffer shorelands from erosion by absorbing wave energy that otherwise would be expended on the toes of bluffs or dunes. Beaches that are high and wide protect shorelands from erosion more effectively than beaches that are low or narrow. Beaches also act as reservoirs of sand or other unconsolidated material for longshore littoral transport and offshore sandbar and shoal formation. The following restrictions apply to regulated activities in beach areas: A. Excavating, grading or mining which diminishes the erosion protection afforded by beaches is prohibited. B. Clean sand or gravel of an equivalent or slightly larger grain size is the only material which may be deposited within beach areas. Any deposition will require a coastal erosion management permit, which may be issued only for expansion or stabilization of beaches. C. Active bird nesting and breeding areas must not be disturbed unless such disturbance is pursuant to a specific wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department. D. All development is prohibited on beaches unless specifically provided for by this chapter. § 37-16. Dune area. Dunes prevent overtopping and store sand for coastal processes. High, vegetated dunes provide a greater degree of protection than low, unvegetated ones. Dunes are of the greatest protective 2 'Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows value during conditions of storm-induced high water. Because dunes often protect some of the most biologically productive areas as well as developed coastal areas,their protective value is especially great. The key to maintaining a stable dune system is the establishment and maintenance of beachgrass or other vegetation on the dunes and assurance of a supply of nourishment sand to the dunes. The following restrictions apply to regulated activities in dune areas: A. In primary dune areas: (1) Excavating, grading or mining of primary dunes is prohibited. (2) Clean sand of a compatible type and size is the only material which may be deposited. Any deposition requires a coastal erosion management permit. (3) All depositions must be vegetatively stabilized using species tolerant of the conditions at the site and must be placed so as to increase the size of, or restore, a dune or dune area. (4) Active bird nesting and breeding areas must not be disturbed, unless such disturbance is pursuant to a specific wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department. (5) Nonmajor additions to existing structures are allowed on primary dunes pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit and subject to permit conditions concerning the location, design and potential impacts of the structure on the primary dune. (6) Stone revetments or other erosion protection structures compatible with primary dunes will only be allowed at the waterward toe of primary dunes and must not interfere with the exchange of sand between primary dunes and their fronting beaches. B. In secondary dune areas: (1) All depositions must be of clean sand of a compatible type and size, and all grading must be performed so as to increase the size of, or restore,a dune or former dune area. (2) Excavating, grading or mining must not diminish the erosion protection afforded by them. (3) Nonmajor additions to existing structures are allowed on secondary dunes pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit. (4) Permitted construction,reconstruction, restoration or modifications must be built on adequately anchored pilings such that at least three (3) feet of open space exists between the floor joists and the surface of the secondary dune; and the permitted activity must leave the space below the lowest horizontal structural members free of obstructions. C. All other activities and developments in dune areas are prohibited unless specifically provided for by this chapter. 3 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows D. The restrictions of§ 37-19, Traffic control, apply to dune°areas. §37-17. Bluff area. Bluffs protect shorelands and coastal development by absorbing the often destructive energy of open water. Bluffs are a source of depositional material for beaches and other unconsolidated natural protective features. A. The following activities are prohibited on bluffs: (1) Excavating or mining, except when in conjunction with conditions stated in a coastal erosion management permit issued for minor alterations in construction of an erosion protection structure or for provision of shoreline access. (2) The restrictions of§ 37-19, Traffic control, apply to bluffs. (3) All development unless specifically allowed by § 37-17B of this chapter. (4) Disturbance of active bird nesting and breeding areas, unless such disturbance is pursuant to a specific wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department. (5) Soil disturbance that directs surface water runoff over a bluff face. B. Activities specifically allowed under this section are: (1) Minor alteration of a bluff done in accordance with conditions stated in a coastal erosion management permit issued for new construction, modification or restoration of an erosion protection structure. (2) Bluff cuts done in accordance with conditions stated in a coastal erosion management permit issued for the provision of shoreline access, where: (a) The cut is made in a direction perpendicular to the shoreline. (b) The ramp slope may not exceed one to six(1:6). (c) The side slopes may not exceed one to three (1:3), unless terraced or otherwise structurally stabilized. (d) The side slopes and other disturbed nonroadway areas must be stabilized with vegetation or other approved physical means. (e) The completed roadway must be stabilized and drainage provided for. (3) New construction, modification or restoration of walkways or stairways done in accordance with conditions of a coastal erosion management permit. 4 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows (4) Nonmajor additions to existing structures on bluffs, pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit. § 37-18. Erosion protection structures. 5 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows to the shoreline a horizontal distance landward which is forty(40)times the long-term average annual recession rate. STRUCTURE -- Any object constructed, installed or placed in, on or under land or water, including but not limited to a building;permanent shed; deck;in-ground and aboveground pool; garage;mobile home;road;public service distribution, transmission or collection system;tank; dock;pier;wharf; groin;jetty; seawall;bulkhead;breakwater;revetment; artificial beach nourishment; or any addition to or alteration of the same. TOE -- The lowest surface point on a slope face of a dune or bluff. UNREGULATED ACTIVITY --Excepted activities which are not regulated by this chapter include but are not limited to elevated walkways or stairways constructed solely for pedestrian use and built by an individual property owner for the limited purposes of providing noncommercial access to the beach; docks,piers, wharves or structures built on floats, columns, open timber piles or other similar open work supports with a top surface area of less than two hundred(200) square feet or which are removed in the fall of each year; normal beach grooming or cleanup; maintenance of structures when normal and customary and/or in compliance with an approved maintenance program;planting vegetation and sand fencing so as to stabilize or entrap sand in primary dune and secondary dune areas in order to maintain or increase the height and width of dunes;routine agricultural operations, including cultivation or harvesting; and the implementation of practices recommended in a soil and water conservation plan as defined in§ 3, Subsection(12), of the Soil and Water Conservation Districts Law;provided, however,that agricultural operations and implementation of practices will not be construed to include any activity that involves the construction or placement of a structure. VEGETATION-- Plant life capable of surviving and successfully reproducing in the area or region and which is compatible with the environment of the coastal erosion hazard area. §§37-7 through 37-9. (Reserved) ARTICLE II, Regulations 4 'Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows coastal erosion management permit. PERSON-- Any individual, public or private corporation, political subdivision, government agency,public improvement district, partnership, association, firm, trust, estate or any other legal entity whatsoever. PRIMARY DUNE -- The most waterward major dune where there are two (2) or more parallel dunes within a coastal area. Where there is only one (1) dune present, it is the "primary" one. Occasionally one (1) or more relatively small dune formations exist waterward of the primary dune. These smaller formations will be considered to be part of the "primary dune" for the purposes of this chapter. The waterward limit of a primary dune is the landward limit of its fronting beach. The landward limit of the primary dune is twenty-five (25) feet landward of its landward toe. RECEDING EDGE -- The most landward line of active erosion or, in cases where there is no discernible line of active erosion,the most waterward line of permanent vegetation. RECESSION RATE -- The rate, expressed in feet per year, at which an eroding shoreline moves landward. REGULATED ACTIVITY-- The construction, modification, restoration or placement of a structure, or major addition to a structure, or any action or use of land which materially alters the condition of land, including grading, excavating, dumping, mining, dredging, filling or other disturbance of soil. RESTORATION-- The reconstruction without modification of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty percent(50%) of the estimated full replacement cost of the structure at the time of restoration. Modifications, however,may be allowed if they do not exceed preexisting size limits and are intended to mitigate impacts to natural protective features and other natural resources. SECONDARY DUNE -- The major dune immediately landward of the primary dune. The waterward limit of a secondary dune is the landward limit of its fronting primary dune. The landward limit of a"secondary dune" is twenty-five (25) feet landward of its landward toe. SIGNIFICANT FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT-- Those habitats which are essential to the survival of a large portion of a particular fish or wildlife population; support rare or endangered species; are found at a very low frequency within a geographic area; support fish or wildlife populations having significant commercial or recreational value; or that would be difficult or impossible to replace. STRUCTURAL HAZARD AREA-- Those shorelands located landward of natural protective features and having shorelines receding at a long-term average recession rate of one (1) foot or more per year. The inland boundary of a"structural hazard area" is calculated by starting at the landward limit of the fronting natural protective feature and measuring along a line perpendicular 3 j S ♦lr 6 - r `3i 3'. � w ��45{ 7 ��s, Q!�i�$ •S.r� 4�G ��n � ! �� 35. S '{s / • x3xu xe ?Y gf;sn f°.y?'p+, f t r r t .ter �A w\ o j x i� , rt� ^ls M s m* 00 �i Ik 1` p � b. `2�{f�'bH�,M17 )k '�' / 'Y q1 t �f �rl,a�•F� � � • � 1 • •,.,R, �rrr�r , . �, , ..3 �u.- t.fp +q a..,. y ... .. .. � ,_ - _ r,:.Q ��,��Sri .��, -�� / � _ � _. .,,,��_.r'y .. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT JJ GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE.. DEPARTMENT OF.HEALTH SERVICES CLARE B.BRADLEY,M.D.,M.P.H. COMMISSIONER 26Dec01 -- -- Orient Yacht Club Attn: Mr Linton Duell : -_ JAN 3 % 02 Village Lane Orient, N.Y. 11957 Dear Mr Duell: Analysis of water samples taken from the Yacht Club on 30Aug01 have been completed by the Public Health Laboratory. The samples were analyzed for carbamate pesticides;:chlorinated pesticides, the herbicide Dacthal, herbicide metabolites, metals,'Standard.inorganics;semi-volatile organics as well as volatile organics. Result sheets are attached for your records. At the time of collection the raw water exceeded the MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level) for the herbicide Alachlor. In addition traces of the Alachlor metabolites OA and ESA were also found. Traces of the gasoline additive MTBE, traces of the pesticide Temik and lead were also detected. Results of the treated water sample indicates that the carbon is removing the contaminants and all parameters tested were within the limits set for potable water by both Federal and State Health agencies. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please call 852-1906. Truly yours, T.M. Martin cc: Town Trustees Culligan *DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY*DRINKING WATER BUREAU*RIVERHEAD COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD NY 11901-3397 Phone(631)852-1905 Fax(631)852-2743 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Facility Name: ORIENT YACHT CLUB Inspection No.: NC01-3066 Fed. ID #: 5130125 Location: 2110 VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT Sample Date: 08/30/01 Sample Location: RAW TAP Sanitarian: MARTIN Treatment: NONE Field No.: 400-421-01-08-30 Notes: <' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. *' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Total Aldicarb (calc) ............. < 0.000 7.00 ug/L Oxamyl.... .................. .. .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb........... ............... < 0.500 ug/L Carbaryl........ ...... ........ .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfoxide................ < 0.500 ug/L 1-Naphthol.. ...................... < 0.500 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfone....... ........... < 0.500 ug/L Methomyl.... ...................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Carbofuran........................ < 0.500 40.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon) ........... ...... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran............ .. . < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb............ . . ...... .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: BACTERIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services TColi.... ......................... < ABSENT ABSENT EColi........... ...... ........ .... < ABSENT ABSENT Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.......................... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDD... .............. .......... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L beta-BHC....................... ... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDT......... ........ ...... .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L gamma-BHC (Lindane) ................ < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Endrin.......... ...... ........ .... < 0.200 2.00 11g/L delta-BHC......................... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Endrin aldehyde. ...... .. ...... .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Heptachlor............. ........... < 0.200 0.40 ug/L Chlordane...... ....... .. ...... .... < 1.000 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide................ < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Alachlor.;:,�-A..... ...... ...... .. .... = 4.320 2.00 ug/L Aldrin......... ...... ........ ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Methoxychl`or... ......... .......... < 0.500 40.00 ug/L Dieldrin.......................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan II... ........ ...... .... < 0.200 2.00 ug/L Endosulfan I..... ...... ........... < 0.200 2.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate............ .... < 0.200 50-0 ug/L Dacthal........................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane............. .... < 0.020 0.05 ug/L 4,4-DDE........ ...... ........ ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane... .... < 0.020 0.20 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DACTHAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Monomethyltetrachloroterephthalate < 10.000 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid...... < 10.000 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Didealkylatrazine (G-28273) ....... '< 0.800 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202) .. ...... < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Deisopropylatrazine (G-28279) ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CGA-354743) ...... < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Desethylatrazine (G-30033)........ < 0.400 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638) < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Imidacloprid... ...... .. .............. 0,200 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172) < 0.300 50.00 ug/L �Alachlor OA (Oxanilic Acid) .. - 1.18,d,� 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-67125) < 0.300 50.00 ug/L 'Ala'chlor`-ESA (Sulfonic Acid) . _ `3'.140" 50.00 ug/L 2-HydroxyAtrazine (G-34048). ...... < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735) < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Malaoxon.. .......... .............. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services ___________________________ Silver (Ag)....................... < 5.000 100.00 ug/L Nickel (Ni)....................... = 9.900 100.00 ug/L Aluminum (Al) ..................... = 309.000 ug/L Lead (Pb). .................. ...... = 21.700 15.00 ug/L Arsenic (As)................ ...... < 2.000 50.00 ug/L Antimony (Sb) ....... ........ ...... < 1.000 6.00 ug/L Barium (Ba)....................... = 34.500 2000.00 ug/L Selenium (Se) ............... ...... < 2.000 50.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be).................... < 1.000 4.00 ug/L Thorium (Th) .......... ........ .... < 1.000 ug/L Cadmium (Cd) ....... .. ............. < 1.000 5.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti) ................ . .... = 14.400 ug/L Cobalt (Cc) .......... ............. < 1.000 ug/L Thallium (T1) ....... ........ .. .... < 1.000 2.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr)........ .. ........... = 2.800 100.00 ug/L Vanadium (V) ........ ........ ...... = 1.000 ug/L Copper (Cu) ........ ............... = 52.100 1300.00 ug/L zinc (Zn). ........ .. ........ . . .... = 159.000 5000.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg) . .. ...... ............. < 0.400 2.00 ug/L Iron (Fe). ........ .. ........ ...... = 0.215 0.30 mg/L Manganese (Mn) . ...... .. ........... = 0.040 0.30 mg/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc) . = 0.255 0.50 mg/L Molybdenum (Mo) .. ................. < 1.000 ug/L Sodium (Na) ....... .. .... ...... .... = 22.200 270.00 mg/L Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab........... .... .... ...... ... = 6.200 su Nitrate... .................... .... = 5.800 10.00 mg/L Specific Conductivity-Lab......... = 225.000 um/cm Bromide. ....................... .... < 0.200 mg/L Sulfate (SO4) ..................... = 22.000 250.00 mg/L Orthophosphate.............. ...... < 0.100 mg/L Ammonia (NH3-N) ........ ........ ... = 0.080 mg/L Fluoride.................... ...... < 0.200 2.20 mg/L Nitrite (NO2-N) .. .... .. ........... < 0.020 1.00 mg/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Facility Name: ORIENT YACHT CLUB Inspection No.: NCO1-3066 Fed. ID #: 5130125 Location: 2110 VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT Sample Date: 08/30/01 Sample Location: RAW TAP Sanitarian: MARTIN Treatment: NONE Field No. : 400-421-01-08-30 1 Notes: <' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. *' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ____= Results for Sample Group: SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Hexachlorocyclopentadiene.... ..... < 1.000 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor..... ...... .. ...... .... < 0.200. 50.U0 ug/L Hexachlorobenzene........ ......... < 0.200 1.00 ug/L Dacthal... ...... .. .... ...... .. .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Simazine.......................... < 0.200 4.00 ug/L Butachlor....... ...... ...... .. .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Atrazine.......................... < 0.200 3.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate...... .... < 0.500 400.00 ug/L Total Triazines + Metabolites (Cal < 0.000 4.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate.... .... < 2.000 6.00 ug/L Metribuzin..... ................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Benzo(a)pyrene.. .................. < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Alachlor....... ................... = 3.170 2.00 ug/L * Bromacil.. ...... .. .... ........ .... < 0.500 ug/L Propachlor..... .......... ......... < 0.200 ug/L Prometon........ .............. .... < 0.500 ug/L Diazinon............. ............. < 0.200 ug/L Pentachlorobenzene..._........ .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl...I..................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Disulfoton...... .............. .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron.... ...... .......... ... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Ethofumesate.... ....... . .... .. .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Acetochlor....... .... .. .... ...... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Chlorpyriphos... .............. .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Malathion...... ........ ........... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Cyfluthiin............. ....... .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Isofenphos............... ......... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Benfluralin......... .. ........ .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Trifluralin.......... ............. < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Chlorothalonil........ ........ .... < 1.000 50.00 ug/L Pentachloronitrobenzene.. ......... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Triadimefon..... .. .... ...... .. .... < 0.500 50.00 ua/L Vinclozolin.. ........ .... ......... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Iodofenphos................... .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Pendimethalin.... ........ ......... < 0.200 5.00 ug/L Permethrin..... . ....... ...... . .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Iprodione......................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Terbufos.. ................... . .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L EPTC............... .... .. ... ...... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Terbacil........ ...... ........ .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Dinoseb...... .......... .. ......... < 0.500 7.00 ug/L Disulfoton sulfone.... .. ..... . .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Cyanazine...... ........ .. ......... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Kelthane.. ...... .. .... ............ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L . Napropamide.. ..................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Dichlorbenil.......... ............ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Bloc... ........ ................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Resmethrin............ ........ .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Methoprene..... .......... ......... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Piperonyl butoxide.... ........ .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Sumithrin.................. ....... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Methyl parathion...... ........ .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Ethyl Parathion................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Propiconazole (Tilt) .. ........ .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Azoxystrobin................ ...... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate.... ...... .. .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Dieldrin.......................... < 0.200 50:00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.......... .:. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Benzene... ...... ...... ........ .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane........ ... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Toluene......... ...... ........ .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane...................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene... .................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane...................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene.... ...... ............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane..................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene.. ........................ < 0.500 5.f10 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L m-Xylene.. ...... ...... ............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride....... .. ............ < 0.500 2.00 ug/L p-Xylene.. ........ .... . ... .... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..... ........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes..................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane... ............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene....... ...... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene.......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 3-Chlorotoluene......... .... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chloroform........... ........ ..... < 0.500 80.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene............. .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane... ............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether............... .. .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.. ........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile............... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride. .... ......... < 0.500' 5.00 ug/L Ethylmethacrylate............. .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L T. Chlorotoluene.................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.. ............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene...... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene...... .... ......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Tri.methylbenzene...... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane. ............. < 0.500 80.00 ug/L m,p-Dichlorobenzene........... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o) ..... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.. ...... .... .. .. ......... < 0.500 80.00 ug/L p-Diethylberzene...... . ..... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene........ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Freon 113............ .......... ... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene........ .... < 0.500 5.00 .ug/L Dibromomethane....... ............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene).... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene........ ....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1-Methylethylbenzene.............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl isothiocyanate...... ....... < 2.000 50.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene... ...... .... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide. .... ............. < 0.500 ug/L tort-Butylbenzene....... .... ... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate............... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene.............. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene................ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene). .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane........... ... < 0.500 80.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene.. ...... ........ .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2,3 Dichloropropene............... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene... ...... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene........ ... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl_-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE) :... 0.800' 50.00 ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene..... ...... ...... .. .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2 Trichloroethane............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane.... ........ .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide.. ...... ......... .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide..... ....... ..... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene.... ...... ........ .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.. .. ........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK) ...... ...... . . .... < 20.000 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.. ............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran.............. ..... < 20.000 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane... ............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride................ .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L tert-Butyl-Ethyl-Ether. ........... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile................. < 0.500 5.10 ug/L tert-Amyl-Methyl-Ether............ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L d-Limonene.................. . . .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L ` SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Facility Name: ORIENT YACHT CLUB Inspection No.: NC01-3066 Fed. ID #: 5130125 Location: 2110 VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT Sample Date: 08/30/01 Sample Location: OT (TREATED) Sanitarian: MARTIN Treatment: CARBON & SEDIMENT Field'No.: 401-421-01-08-30 Notes: <' symbol means "less than" indicating IQ detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. *' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Total Aldicarb (calc) .......... ... < 0.000 7.00 ug/L Oxamyl....................... ..... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb.......................... < 0.500 ug/L Carbaryl........ ...... .. ...... .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfoxide............. ... < 0.500 ug/L 1-Naphthol............ ........ .... < 0.500 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfone. .... .... ......... < 0.500 ug/L Methomyl.... .......... ...... .. .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Carbofuran........... .... ......... < 0.500 40.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon)..... ...... ...... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran............... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb..... ....... ............ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: BACTERIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services TColi............................. < ABSENT ABSENT EColi............. ............ .... < ABSENT ABSENT Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.... ................. ... . < 0.200 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDD....................... .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L beta-BHC......................... . < 0.200 0.20 ug/L .4,4-DDT....................... .... < 0.2C0 50.00 t•.g/L gamma-BHC (Lindane)............... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Endrin............ ............ .... < 0.200 2.00 ug/L delta-BHC.. .......... .... ........ . < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Endrin aldehyde.............. ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Heptachlor............... ......... < 0.200 0.40 ug/L Chlordane......... ................ < 1.000 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide................ < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Alachlor............... ....... .... < 0.500 2.00 ug/L Aldrin....... ...... ...... .. ....... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Methoxychlor...... ..... ........... < 0.500 40.00 ug/L Dieldrin....... ............ ....... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan II.......... ...... . .... < 0.200 2.u0 ug/L Endosulfan I. .. .......... .. .... ... < 0.200 2.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate............ .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Dacthal...... ............ ......... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane. ................ < 0.020 0.05 ug/L 4,4-DDE........................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane... .... < 0.020 0.20 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DACTHAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Monomethyltetrachloroterephthalate < 10.000 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid.. .... < 10.000 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Didealkylatrazine (G-28273) ....... < 0.800 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202) .... .... < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Deisopropylatrazine (G-28279)..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CGA-354743) .. .... < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Desethylatrazine (G-30033)..... ... < 0.400 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638) < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Imidacloprid................... ... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172) < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Alachlor OA (Oxanilic Acid) .... ... < 0.400 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-67125) < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Alachlor ESA (Sulfonic Acid)...... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L 2-HydroxyAtrazine (G-34048). ...... < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735) < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Malaoxon.................... ...... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Silver (Ag) .. .... ................. < 5.000 100.00 ug/L Nickel (Ni)....... .... ...... ...... = 1.200 100.00 ug/L Aluminum (Al) ..................... = 72.600 ug/L Lead (Pb)......... ................ = 4.500 15.00 ug/L Arsenic (As) ......... ........ ..... < 2.000 50.00 ug/L Antimony (Sb) ..... ................ < 1.000 6.00 ug/L Barium (Ba).......... .. ........... = 42.900 2000.00 ug/L Selenium (Se) ..... ................ < 2.000 50.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be).................... < 1.000 4.00 ug/L Thorium (Th) .................. .. .. < 1.000 ug/L Cadmium (Cd)...................... < 1.000 5.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti) .. ....... ........ .... = 3.500 ug/L Cobalt (Co) ........ .......... ..... < 1.000 ug/L Thallium (rl).. . ...... ....... . .... < 1.000 2.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr) ...... ............... = 2.500 100.00 ug/L vanadium (V) ... . .............. .... < 1.000 ug/L Copper (Cu) ....................... = 99.800 1300.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn) ... ... . ...... ........ .... = 103.000 5000.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg)...................... < 0.400 2.00 ug/L Iron (Fe)............. ....... ..... < 0.100 0.30 mg/L Manganese (Mn).................... = 0.038 0.30 mg/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc). = 0.038 0.50 mg/L Molybdenum (Mo) .. .......... .... ... < 1.000 ug/L Sodium (Na) ........... ...... . ..... = 23.300 270.00 mg/L Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab........... ................. = 5.900 su Nitrate. .. ........ ................ < 4.700 10.00 mg/L Specific Conductivity-Lab......... = 219.000 um/cm Bromide..... ...................... < 0.200 mg/L Sulfate (SO4) .............. .... ... < 26.000 250.00 mg/L Orthophosphate.... ............ .... < 0.100 mg/L Ammonia (NH3-N) ................... < 0.020 mg/L Fluoride.............. ........ .... < 0.200 2.20 mg/L Nitrite (NO2-N) ................ ... < 0.020 1.00 mg/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Facility Name: ORIENT YACHT CLUB Inspection No.: NC01-3066 Fed. ID #: 5130125 Location: 2110 VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT Sample Date: 08/30/01 Sample Location: OT (TREATED) Sanitarian: MARTIN Treatment: CARBON & SEDIMENT Field No.: 401-421-01-08-30 Notes: <' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. *' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ===== Results for Sample Group: SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Hexachlorocyclopentadiene......... < 1.000 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor....................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Hexachlorobenzene................. < 0.200 1.00 ug/L Dacthal... ............ ...... .. .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Simazine.......................... < 0.200 4.00 ug/L Butachlor......................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Atrazine.......................... < 0.200 3.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate.... ...... < 0.500 400.00 ug/L Total Triazines + Metabolites (Cal < 0.000 4.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate........ < 2.000 6.00 ug/L Metribuzin........................ < .0.200 50.00 ug/L Benzo(a)pyrene.......... .......... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Alachlor.......................... < 0.200 2.00 ug/L Bromacil.......................... < 0.500 ug/L Propachlor......... .... ........... < 0.200 ug/L Prometon................ .......... < 0.500 ug/L Diazinon........... .. ............. < 0.200 ug/L Pentachlorobenzene................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl...................... ... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Disulfoton.......... ...... ........ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron.......... .. ........... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Ethofumesate.. .............. ...... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Acetochlor................. ........ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Chlorpyri.Fhos..................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Malathion........ .......... ....... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Cyfluthrin........ ................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Isofenphos....... ........ .. ....... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Benfluralin..... .................. < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Trifluralin........ ...... ......... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Chlorothalonil.................... < 1.000 50.00 ug/L Pentachloronitrobenzene..... ...... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Triadimefon................... .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Vinclozolin................. ...... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Iodofenphos............... .. ...... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Pendimethalin................ ..... < 0.200 5.00 ug/L Permethrin........................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Iprodione...... .... ...... ......... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Terbufos.......... ...... .... ...... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L EPTC................... ........... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Terbacil.......... ..... ........... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Dinoseb.......... .... ............. < 0.500 7.00 ug/L Disulfoton sulfone................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Cyanazine......................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Kelthane.. .............. .......... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Napropamide....................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Dichlorbenil...................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Bloc.............................. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Resmethrin........................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Methoprene......... ........ ....... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Piperonyl butoxide................ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Sumithrin......................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Methyl parathion.................. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Ethyl Parathion.... ...... ......... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Propiconazole (Tilt) .............. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Azoxystrobin................... ... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Dieldrin. ......................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane...... ....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Benzene... ................... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane.... ....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Toluene..................... .. .....< 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane............... ....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene..... ................ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane...................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene.................. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.. ............ . ...... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene.............. ...... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane... ......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L m-Xylene...................... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride.................... < 0.500 2.00 ug/L p-Xylene.......................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride....... ......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes..................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane................ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene.......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 3-Chlorotoluene................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chloroform........................ < 0.500 80.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane............. ... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether..................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile..................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride........... ... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Ethylmethacrylate................. < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L T. Chlorotoluene....... ........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane............... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene...... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene.... ............... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Tri.methylbenzene........ .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane....... ....... < 0.500 80.00 ug/L m,p-Dichlorobenzene........... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane...... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o) ........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromoform............. ............ < 0.500 80.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene............ .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene.. ...... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene... ......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene.. .... ...... < 0.500 5.G0 ug/L Freon 113................ ......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene.. ........ .. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane.................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene) .......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.. ............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1-Methylethylbenzene........._.... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl isothiocyanate............. < 2.000 50.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene. .................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide..... .......... ... < 0.500 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate............... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene.................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene......... ....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene) ..... .. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane.............. < 0.500 80.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene.................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2,3 Dichloropropene...... .. ....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene............... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene.. ......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE) .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene....................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2 Trichloroethane............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane................ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide............ ........ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide. ........ .. ...... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene...................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2•,2 Dichloropropane.. .......... ... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK) .. ........ .. .. .... < 20.000 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.. ............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran... ........ ........ < 20.000 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane............... . < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride.............. ...... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L tert-Butyl-Ethyl-Ether............ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile........... ...... < 0.500 5.70 ug/L tert-Amyl-Methyl-Ether............ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L d-Limonene...... .. .......... ...... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L COUNTY OF SUFFOLK a ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CLARE B.BRADLEY,M.D.,M.P.H. 1_.... �' COMMISSIONER 5Jul01 Orient Yacht Club t Attn: Mr Linton Duell 2. •-: Village Lane Orient,N.Y. 11957 Dear Mr Duell: Analysis of water samples taken from the Yacht Club on 24May01 have been completed by the Public Health Laboratory. The samples were analyzed for carbamate pesticides, chlorinated pesticides, the herbicide Dacthal, herbicide metabolites, metals, standard inorganics, semi-volatile organics as well as volatile organics, perchlorate and radiological. Result sheets are attached for your records. At the time of collection the water exceeded the MCL (2ppb Maximum Contaminant Level) for the herbicide Alachlor with 5.3 being detected in the raw water. This contaminant has increased three times over last years results. In addition traces of the Alachlor metabolites OA and ESA were also found. Traces of the gasoline additive MTBE continue to be detected. All other constituents tested were within the limits established for potable water. Results of the treated water indicate that the carbon was removing all of the Alachlor as well as the MTBE. When the samples were collected 56,100 gallons of water had been treated by the carbon units. This Department will resample this supply before Labor Day. Should you have any questions, please call 852-1906. Truly yours, T.M. Martin cc: Town Trustees Culligan ♦DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DRINKING WATER BUREAU♦RIVERHEAD COUNTY CENTER♦RIVERHEAD NY 11901-3397 Phone(631)852-1905 Fax(631)852-2743 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: ORIENT YACHT CLUB Request No.: PRO1-02B0 Location: VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT Sample Date: 04/24/01 Sample Location: RAW TAP Sanitarian: MARTIN Treatment: RAW Field No.: 400-421-01-04-24 Notes: <' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. *' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Total Aldicarb (calc) ............. < 0.000 7.00 ug/L Oxamyl............................ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb.......................... < 0.500 ug/L Carbaryl........ .................. < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfoxide................ < 0.500 ug/L 1-Naphthol...... .................. < 0.500 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfone.................. < 0.500 ug/L Methomyl.......................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Carbofuran....... ............ ..... < 0.500 40.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon)............. .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran.......... ..... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb........ ............ .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: BACTERIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services TColi.... .................... ..... < ABSENT ABSENT EColi............................. < ABSENT ABSENT Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.................... ..... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDD........................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L beta-BHC............... ........... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDT........................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L gamma-BHC (Lindane) ............... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Endrin............................ < 0.200 2.00 ug/L delta-BHC........ ................. < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Endrin aldehyde................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Heptachlor........................ < 0.200 0.40 ug/L Chlordane......... ................ < 1.000 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide........... ..... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Alachlor................ .......... = 5.330 2.00 ug/L Aldrin....................... ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Methoxychlor.......... .. .......... < 0.500 40.00 ug/L Dieldrin............... ........... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan II..................... < 0.200 2.00 ug/L Endosulfan I...................... < 0.200 2.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate...... .......... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Dacthal.... ...... .......... ....... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane............. ..... < 0.020 0.05 ug/L 4,4-DDE.......... ................. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane... .... < 0.020 0.20 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DACTHAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Monomethyltetrachloroterephthalate < 10.000 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid...... < 10.000 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Didealkylatrazine (G-28273) .. ..... < 0.800 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202) .... .... < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Deisopropylatrazine (G-28279) ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CGA-354743)...... < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Desethylatrazine (G-30033)... ..... < 0.400 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638) < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Imidacloprid........... ........... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172) < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Alachlor CA (Oxanilic Acid)....... = 1.900 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-67125) < 0.300 50A0 ug/L Alachlor ESA (Sulfonic Acid) ...... = 2.400 50.00 ug/L 2-HydroxyAtrazine (G-34048)....... < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735) < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Silver (Ag) ....................... < 5.000 100.00 ug/L Nickel (Ni)....................... = 2.600 100.00 ug/L Aluminum (Al)..................... = 277.000 ug/L Lead (Pb). ........................ = 8.600 15.00 ug/L Arsenic (As)...................... < 2.000 50.00 ug/L Antimony (Sb)..................... < 1.000 6.00 ug/L Barium (Ba) ....................... = 49.100 2000.00 ug/L Selenium (Se)......... ............ < 2.000 50.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be).................... < 1.000 4.00 ug/L Thorium (Th) ...................... < 1.000 ug/L Cadmium (Cd)............... ....... < 1.000 5.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti)......... ............ = 6.400 ug/L Cobalt (Co)....................... < 1.000 ug/L Thallium (T1)........... .. ........ < 1.000 2.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr) ..................... = 2.700 100.00 ug/L Vanadium (V) ...................... < 1.000 ug/L Copper (Cu)....................... = 18.300 1300.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn) ................... ...... = 335.000 5000.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg)..... ............ ..... < 0.400 2.00 ug/L Iron (Fe)..................... .... < 0.100 0.30 mg/L Manganese (Mn)............... ..... = 0.084 0.30 mg/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc) . = 0.084 0.50 mg/L Molybdenum (Mo).............. ..... < 1.000 ug/L Sodium (Na) ................... .... = 24.400 270.00 mg/L Results for Sample Group: PERCHLORATE analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Perchlorate...... ................. < 2.000 18.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: RADIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Gross alpha E.... ................. < 1.000 15.00 pC/L Tritium....................... .... < 200.000 20000 pC/L Gross beta... .... ................. = 5.200 50.00 pC/L Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab................... .... ..... = 6.200 su Ammonia (NH3-N)....... ........ .... = 0.170 mg/L Specific Conductivity-Lab......... = 243.000 um/cm Nitrite (NO2-N)....... ............ < 0.020 1.00 mg/L Chloride (Cl) .... ................. = 29.000 250.00 mg/L Nitrites + Nitrates (NO3-N) ... .... = 4.500 10.00 mg/L Sulfate (SO4).... ............ ..... = 22.000 250.00 mg/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: ORIENT YACHT CLUB Request No.: PRO1-0280 _ Location: VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT Sample Date: 04/24/01 Sample Location: RAW TAP Sanitarian: MARTIN Treatment: RAW Field No.: 400-421-01-04-24 Notes: <' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. *' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ===== Results for Sample Group: SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Hexachlorocyclopentadiene......... < 1.000 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor............. .......... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Hexachlorobenzene................. < 0.200 1.00 ug/L Dacthal......... .................. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Simazine.......................... < 0.200 4.00 ug/L Butachlor......................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Atrazine.......................... < 0.200 3.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate.......... < 0.500 400.00 ug/L Total Triazines + Metabolites (Cal < 0.000 4.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate........ < 2.000 6.00 ug/L Metribuzin........................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Benzo(a)pyrene.................... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Alachlor.......................... = 3.690 2.00 ug/L * Bromacil........ ........ .......... < 0.500 ug/L Propachlor..... ...... ............. < 0.200 ug/L Prometon.............. .. .......... < 0.500 ug/L Diazinon.......................... < 0.200 ug/L Pentachlorobenzene.... ............ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl...... .............. ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Disulfoton...... ...... ........ .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron.................. ..... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Ethofumesate.... .............. .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Acetochlor..... .............. ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Chlorpyriphos... .............. .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Malathion......................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Cyfluthrin...... .. ............ .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Isofenphos........................ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Benfluralin........... ............ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Trifluralin....................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Chlorothalonil.. .. .... ........ .... < 1.000 50.00 ug/L Pentachloronitrobenzene...... ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Triadimefon........... ........ .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Vinclozolin....................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Iodofenphos..... .................. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Pendimethalin..................... < 0.200 5.00 ug/L Permethrin........................ < 0.20b 50.00 ug/L Iprodione.................... ..... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Terbufos...................... .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L EPTC......................... ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Terbacil...................... .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Dinoseb........................... < 0.500 7.00 ug/L Disulfoton sulfone................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Cyanazine...................... ... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Kelthane................ .......... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Napropamide....................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Methoprene........................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Bloc....:..........I—........... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Sumithrin....... .................. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Resmethrin................... ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Dichlorbenil.... ...... ........ .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L tert-Amyl-Methyl-Ether........ .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Benzene... .................... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane..... ...... ........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Toluene....................... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane... ................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene..................... < 0.500 5:00 ug/L Chloromethane........ ...... ....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene.......... ............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane......... ... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene.............. .. .......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride..... .......... ..... < 0.500 2.00 ug/L m-Xylene.......................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride........... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L p-Xylene.......................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane........... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes..................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene.......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chloroform................... ..... < 0.500 80.00 ug/L 3-Chlorotoluene............... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane........... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane........ ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L T. Chlorotoluene.............. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride......... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane....... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene........ .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane............... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L m,p-Dichlorobenzene......... .. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene.. ................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o) ........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane.............. < 0.500 80.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene.............. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene.... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromoform............ ............. < 0.500 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene........ .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene....... .. ... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene) ...... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.................... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1-Methylethylbenzene.. ............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane.................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.......... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene..... ............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene................ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene.............. .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane.............. < 0.500 80.00 ug/L Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2,3 Dichloropropene...... ......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene................ .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene......_.... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene........... .... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE) .... = 0.700 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2 Trichloroethane............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............. .......... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane...... .......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide.......... .......... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide................. < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.......... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene...................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.......... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK) .................. < 20.000 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane........... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran............... .... < 20.000 50.00 ug/L tert-Butyl-Ethyl-Ether....... ..... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: ORIENT YACHT CLUB Request No.: PRO1-0280 _ Location: VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT Sample Date: 04/24/01 Sample Location: OT TREATED Sanitarian: MARTIN Treatment: CARBON FILT, SEDIMENT Field No.: 401-421-01-04-24 Notes: < symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. *' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Total Aldicarb (calc)............. < 0.000 7.00 ug/L Oxamyl............................ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb.......................... < 0.500 ug/L Carbaryl...................... .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfoxide............. ... < 0.500 ug/L 1-Naphthol.................... .... < 0.500 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfone. ............ . .... < 0.500 ug/L Methomyl.......................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Carbofuran....... ................. < 0.500 40.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon)................. < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran............... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb...... .................. < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: BACTERIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services TColi.................. ........... < ABSENT ABSENT EColi..... ...... .............. .... < ABSENT ABSENT Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.. ...... ............ .. ... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDD................ ....... .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L beta-BHC....................... ... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDT........................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L gamma-BHC (Lindane) .... ........... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Endrin............................ < 0.200 2.00 ug/L delta-BHC........ ................. < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Endrin aldehyde........ ....... .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Heptachlor........................ < 0.200 0.40 ug/L Chlordane. ...... ....... ....... .... < 1.000 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide........... ..... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Alachlor..................... ..... < 0.500 2.00 ug/L Aldrin................. .. ......... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Methoxychlor.................. .... < 0.500 40.00 ug/L Dieldrin.......................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan II................. .... < 0.200 2.00 ug/L Endosulfan I...................... < 0.200 2.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate............ .... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Dacthal........................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane................. < 0.020 0.05 ug/L 4,4-DDE...................... ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane... .... < 0.020 0.20 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DACTHAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Monomethyltetrachloroterephthalate < 10.000 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid...... < 10.000 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Didealkylatrazine (G-28273)...... . < 0.800 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202) .... .... < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Deisopropylatrazine (G-28279) ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CGA-354743).. .... < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Desethylatrazine (G-30033)........ < 0.400 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638) < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Imidacloprid...................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172) < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Alachlor OA (Oxanilic Acid)....... < 0.400 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-67125) < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Alachlor ESA (Sulfonic Acid)...... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L 2-HydroxyAtrazine (G-34048)... .... < 0.300 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735) < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Silver (Ag) ....................... < 5.000 100.00 ug/L Nickel (Ni) ....................... = 4.200 100.00 ug/L Aluminum (Al)..................... = 161.000 ug/L Lead (Pb)......................... = 1.200 15.00 ug/L Arsenic (As)...................... < 2.000 50.00 ug/L Antimony (Sb)... .............. .... < 1.000 6.00 ug/L Barium (Ba)....................... = 47.500 2000.00 ug/L. Selenium (Se)... .............. .... < 2.000 50.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be)... ................. < 1.000 4.00 ug/L Thorium (Th) ...................... < 1.000 ug/L Cadmium (Cd)...................... < 1.000 5.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti)..................... = 6.600 ug/L Cobalt (Co) ............ .. ......... < 1.000 ug/L Thallium (T1)..................... < 1.000 2.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr).. .. .... ............. = 2.200 100.00 ug/L Vanadium (V) .................. .... < 1.000 ug/L Copper (Cu) ...... ................. = 149.000 1300.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn)..................... .... = 320.000 5000.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg)................. ..... < 0.400 2.00 ug/L Iron (Fe). .................... .... < 0.100 0.30 mg/L Manganese (Mn)............... ..... = 0.077 0.30 mg/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc). = 0.077 0.50 mg/L Molybdenum (Mo) ........ .. ...... ... < 1.000 ug/L Sodium (Na) ....................... = 24.200 270.00 mg/L Results for Sample Group: PERCHLORATE analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Perchlorate.................. ..... < 2.000 18.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab..... ...... ................. = 6.300 su Ammonia (NH3-N)............... .... = 0.170 mg/L Specific Conductivity-Lab......... = 244.000 um/cm Nitrite (NO2-N)......... ...... .... < 0.020 1.00 mg/L Chloride (Cl)..................... = 29.000 250.00 mg/L Nitrites + Nitrates (NO3-N)... .... = 2.500 10.00 mg/L Sulfate (SO4) .... ................. = 26.000 250.00 mg/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE... . SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS �Requestor Name: ORIENT YACHT CLUB Request No.: PR01-0280 Location: VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT Sample Date: 04/24/01 Sample Location: OT TREATED Sanitarian: MARTIN Treatment: CARBON FILT, SEDIMENT Field No.: 401-421-01-04-24 Notes: < symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. *' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ____= Results for Sample Group: SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Hexachlorocyclopentadiene......... < 1.000 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor....................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Hexachlorobenzene................. < 0.200 1.00 ug/L Dacthal........................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Simazine............. ............. < 0.200 4.00 ug/L Butachlor......................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Atrazine.......................... < 0.200 3.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate.......... < 0.500 400.00 ug/L Total Triazines + Metabolites (Cal < 0.000 4.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate........ < 2.000 6.00 ug/L Metribuzin........... ............. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Benzo(a)pyrene.................... < 0.200 0.20 ug/L Alachlor.......................... < 0.200 2.00 ug/L Bromacil.. ........................ < 0.500 ug/L Propachlor........................ < 0.200 ug/L Prometon.......................... < 0.500 ug/L Diazinon..................... ..... < 0.200 ug/L Pentachlorobenzene................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl.................... ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Disulfoton........................ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron.................. ..... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Ethofumesate...................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Acetochlor........................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Chlorpyriphos..................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Malathion......................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Cyfluthrin........................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Isofenphos........................ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Benfluralin....................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Trifluralin.................. ..... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Chlorothalonil.................... < 1.000 50.00 ug/L Pentachloronitrobenzene...... ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Triadimefon..... .................. < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Vinclozolin....................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Iodofenphos....................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Pendimethalin..................... < 0.200 5.00 ug/L Permethrin........................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Iprodione......................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Terbufos.......................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L EPTC.............................. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Terbacil.................... ...... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Dinoseb........................... < 0.500 7.00 ug/L Disulfoton sulfone...... .... ...... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Cyanazine......................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Kelthane.......................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Napropamide....................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Methoprene........................ < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Bloc.............................. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Sumithrin......................... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Resmethrin....... ............ ..... < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Dichlorbenil.... .................. < 0.200 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L tert-Amyl-Methyl-Ether...... ...... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Benzene........................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane...................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Toluene........................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane...................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene..................... < 0.500 5:00 ug/L Chloromethane.... ................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene.... .................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane....... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene.......................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride.................... < 0.500 2.00 ug/L m-Xylene.......................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride................ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L p-Xylene.......................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane................ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes..................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene.......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chloroform........................ < 0.500 80.00 ug/L 3-Chlorotoluene................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane................ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L T. Chlorotoluene.................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride......... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane....... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.......... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L m,p-Dichlorobenzene......... ...... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o) ........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane.............. < 0.500 80.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene............ ...... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene........ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromoform......................... < 0.500 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene) .......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Freon 113......................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1-Methylethylbenzene.............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane.................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene............... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene... ............. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene.................. < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane.............. < 0.500 80.00 ug/L Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)....... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2,3 Dichloropropene............... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene.................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene........... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene............... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene......... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE) .... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2 Trichloroethane........ ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene....................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane................ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.... ..... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide.................... < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane............ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide................. < 0.500 50.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane............... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene...................... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane............... < 0.500 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK) .................. < 20.000 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane................ < 0.500 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran. ............ ...... < 20.000 50.00 ug/L tert-Butyl-Ethyl-Ether............ < 0.500 50.00 ug/L DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW YORK DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS JACOB K.JAVITS FEDERAL BUILDING NEW YORKI N.Y.10278-0090 ' APR 2 6 %Ill,r REPLY TO April 20, -2001 - ATTENTION OF: - Eastern Permits Section SUBJECT: Application No. 2001-00549-L2 by Orient Yacht Company To Whom It May Concern: The New York District, U. S . Army Corps of Engineers, has received a request for Department of the Army authorization for the following activity: APPLICANT: Orient Yacht Company P.O. Box 243 Orient, NY 11957 ACTIVITY: Remove 54 pilings from the west side of the existing timber pier and relocate to the north side of existing solid rock/stone pier. Additionally, install 84 pilings on south side of existing solid rock/stone pier. The purpose of this project is to protect existing stone/rock pier from waves and ice damage . - WATERWAY: Orient Harbor, Gardiners Bay LOCATION: Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York As this is minor in nature, authorization may be by Letter of Permission. This is in accordance with current Federal Regulations governing work in navigable waters of the United States . To accomplish the coordination required, prior to the issuance of a Letter of Permission, your review of the enclosed drawings is requested. Pursuant to Section 307 (c) of the Coasta'1 Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended (16 U.S .C. 1465 (c) (3) (A) ) , the applicant has certified that the activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved state coastal zone management program. To allow for. the timely processing of the subject application, your comments are requested within 20 days of the date of this letter. Sincerely', /James W. Haggert (!JJ � c ief, Eastern Permits Section Enclosures ,emuve 54 Pil oP eofwnba Pier (logf- � n t� I��'l r� Lb ® � _ (109fd) ' N FI•ed ;v� Tkry,er o py � O/ / Flools / 544�' Ve4is of row¢ x ID / fYo� o f'IS a •/' / Floot \ I O l 70A. \ I °,ryloll Pqe// dank I 5s6.5e7vn "- _"--""- JFrome Building __-- _ _— I t Ep T nber As halt Surface Deck an " P over Stone Pier- Pie, _ i1 stone ee iwet°t stomp ------------ plop— oh..+m. .. J14piji. ` 9s" arr ��e Prepared for: ` TUT Orient Wharf Company (a Jill airb ® i Village Lane P.O. Box 243 Proposed: Remove 54 pilings from west Orient,NY 11957 a.` side of timber pier and relocate to north side Scale 1" =40' \ of solid rock/stone pier. Install aproximately 84 ` pilings on south side of existing solid rock/stone Prepared by: , pier. Pilings to be placed immediately adjacent Susan E. Long Permits to each other to armor and fortify the existing P.O.Box 46 rock/stone pier against storm waves and ice damage East Marion,NY 11939-0046 (631)477-3455 Page I of March 31,2001 N ° DII ORIENT ' Fz OD i Tl P.S. 1 — Fio� LOCO S �ec°��v*9l� CEN. Q 49^ CimVAW 33 4-0 00 ok ePp RISTORICAl m CENTRAL Ai�1..1 ,NY 1 , n l �gy�QQ F, soclETr < CEN r'T yak Ip aQ,? Orient Y:C. �+ 1--:) yF 1`Se i 2 31 , S c 8'b Qra �?7 .! MAY > -on I e o4M�1 s� 9RP a`�P s, Tax#1000-25-3-12 T Timothy&Nina Frost P 1 a Pt, 233 East 691h Street VARIES Apt 14-0 iIS I D r-- New York,NY 10021 �n( G � w i i:XI3 TIN, =9,5TALL. 21+-- 10"FILINGS i1 FRAME ALaN6 SOVT-Ft SIDE OF P-yl5rING T1r48E1F— DECK S6LID 96CK STaNE p`ER rsy 6UlLDlNG I ON ROCK S-TONE PIER 2S' pILING S ter,' 1708TRATIbN 1 4O (HEIct{r N.T$ xN AL S1 L�S i t0 FILINGS AIt - plLoltG N R N swE of SOLI D ROCK STONE plf y 7- �0E PILINGS 5- PE10-TRATIoN CRC1t5- 11 EVE SOLID R6eklsro141E - SCAL_F_ 1 = 201 PlEK / apt—.tS�PILI TIN6ER DEaKrNG ovsrz G45Tor1 P H R0 LW A-S r. CouTtu�o�5 BA IT'rc PILL t4cs coNrlNUOUS fILINGS 9I t-RONr VIEW 5CA�.E a0 Prepared for: Prepared by: Orient Whlrf Company Susan E. Long Permits Village Lane ' P.O. Box 46 P.O. Box 243 East Marion,NY 11939-0046 Orient, NY 11957 (631)477-3455 Page 2 of 2 March 31, 2001 f Submission to Southold Town Trustees — 25 April 2001 The Orient Wharf Company ("the applicant"), has submitted two separate applications for a Coastal Erosion Permit and an Amendment to Wetlands Permit#474. The first application, filed 19 March 2001, relates to the water filtration shed; the second application, filed 4 April 2001, relates to the placement of approximately 138 10"x25' spiles along the north and south facing at the seaward-end of the wharf. Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code governs the Wetlands Permit process; Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code governs the Coastal Erosion Permit process. Each chapter of the Southold Town Code clearly sets out the requirements and process for obtaining a permit before undertaking any work We respectfully request that the shed application be denied for the following procedural and substantive reasons. With respect to the Coastal Erosion permit, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§37-40. Specifically,the minimum information requirements of§37-40(A)(2) have not been met. The scale specified for the required map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24,000)"; the map and drawings submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another (1:480)—far too small to provide a basis for meaningful analysis. Failure to include a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. In making these and subsequent points relating to Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §37-43 does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations, procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the "minimum requirements necessary to carry out the purposes of the chapter". Additionally, a properly scaled map would clearly demonstrate that the proposed shed does not meet the Zoning requirements of§100-33. Specifically, the shed does not meet the requirements of§100-33(B) in that the shed is set back less than three (3) feet from the lot line. The application does not meet the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12. Specifically, under the requirement of§37-12(A) it can not be demonstrated and found "that the proposed regulated activity is reasonable and necessary, considering reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location". Permit us to state that we are not opposed to filtration, only filtration that is situated in an illegal structure and location. First, applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed activity is necessary in that all available water tests for Alachlor have been below the threshold for required remediation. Second, even if the need for filtration were to be demonstrated, applicant has a number of reasonable alternatives. As has been.pointed out to applicant, these include placement of the filtration system at a location landward of the coastal erosion area; placement of the 1 t filters within the building at the end of the wharf; provision of non-potable washdown water and bottled potable water with appropriate signage. In any consideration of these alternatives, it should additionally be recognized that the applicant does not need to bear the cost of remediation as it is borne by Monsanto. Having established that the applicant's proposed location for the shed is neither reasonable nor necessary, we would also point out that applicant's characterization of the structure as an "existing, temporary, portable 6'x8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment" is not accurate. Actually, under provisions of the Southold Town Code,the shed is neither legally existing, temporary or portable. Under §37-6 the definition of an existing structure is "a structure...where construction has not begun but for which a building permit has been issued prior to the effective date of this chapter" [10-8-19911. Given that the shed does not have a building permit and was installed after the effective date [5-4-2000], it is incorrect to refer to it as "existing". Even if it is determined that the application meets the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12, the application does not meet the removable restrictions of §37-13. Specifically, §37-13(B) states that"within a structural hazard area the construction of nonmovable structures or placement of major nonmovable additions to an existing structure is prohibited". Under §37-6 and in as much as the shed is constructed upon a newly poured concrete floor it is not within the definition of being a"movable structure". Applicant's attorney conceded in his 15 February 2001 letter to the Town Attorney that the shed is located within the `structural hazard area"'. Even if the applicant successfully argues that the shed is movable, then the application is incomplete in that it does not meet the relocation requirements of§37-13. Specifically, §37-13(F) requires that the application include"plans for landward relocation Rol be included with each application for a permit". Given the inability of the applicant to meet the standards and restrictions of Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, the applicant still has recourse to appeal and seek variances under §37-30. As an additional matter, we would also point out that the applicant has not met or recognized the need to meet the application and permit requirements of Chapter 46 of the Southold Town Code, relating to Flood Damage Prevention. And although we would note the administrator and implementer of this chapter is the Building Inspector, and not the Trustees, the classification of the proposed location of the shed as a"Zone VE" on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (Map Number 36103CO068 G) designates the proposed location of the shed as a coastal high-hazard area with a number of specific requirements to minimize the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. As currently situated and designed the shed is not in compliance with the basic requirements of Chapter 46 which would require that anything built in Zone VE be built in such a manner that the bottom floor joist be above a specified base flood elevation. Additionally, any supporting 2 structure below base flood elevation must be professionally designed and certified to be of a break-away design to reduce potential damage. As shown in the attached FIRM,the specified base flood elevation for the proposed location is eleven(11) feet. As shown on the topographic map furnished by the applicant, the shed as currently situated is at an elevation of six(6) feet, five feet below the required base flood elevation. As with Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §46-7 contains language that does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations, procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the "minimum requirements adopted for the promotion of the public health, safety and welfare". With respect to the Wetland permit, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically, the requirements of§97-21(I) have not been met in that applicant has failed to accurately describe "any known prior operations conducted on the premises in question and whether M prior licenses or permits have been issued". Nor has the applicant referenced the pending Consent Order in the matter of NYSDEC vs. Orient Wharf Company (NOV# 00 CA 168) and the recent imposition of a$50,000 fine by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for numerous instances of"substantial modification, installation and reconstruction without benefit of permit". Nor has the applicant met the requirements of §97-21(J) in providing "documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been obtained". The application has not been processed properly under the requirements of§97-24. Specifically, the requirement of§97-24(A) for the Conservation Advisory Council "to forward its written report of findings and recommendations with respect to such application"has not been met, and under the requirement of§97-24(B) a public hearing on such application shall be held"upon receipt by the Trustees of the report of the Conservation Advisory Council". The application does not meet the negative determination requirements of§97-28. Specifically, the permit does not meet the requirement of§97-28(E) for a negative determination that granting of such permit"will not substantially increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage". In fact, the Zone VE designation of the proposed location of the shed, and the precautionary design and building requirements set forth in Chapter 46, clearly demonstrate the position of Southold Town that there is a significant danger of flood and storm-tide damage. In addition, we would respectfully point out that the applicant has failed to meet the requirements of Chapter 100 of the Southold Town Code. Specifically, §100-111 provides that planning board site approval is required for any non-residential structure— whether principal or accessory—in the M1 district where the wharf is located and the shed is placed. 3 Finally, it is our understanding that New York's General Municipal Law §239-m and Suffolk County Charter §§1323 to 1332 require a referral by local agencies of all applications for"authorizations which a referring body may issue under the provisions of any...local law"where the proposed action(construction of a shed)will be, among other examples, within 500 feet of any bay in Suffolk County. For the reasons set forth above, and noting that nearly one year has passed since the illegal placement of the shed,we respectfully request that the Trustees deny the application and under provisions of§97-31 instruct the Bay Constable to require immediate compliance and to order the removal of the structure with the imposition of fines as specified in §97-33 for any delay in complying with such order. With respect to the spile placement application,we respectfully request that the spile placement application be deferred and held over for the following procedural and substantive issues have been correctly addressed. As with the first application, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§37-40. Specifically,the minimum information requirements of§37- 40(A)(2)have not been met. The scale specified for the required_ map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24,000)"; the map and drawings submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another(1:480). Failure to include a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, as stated previously, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. The application does not meet the environmental review requirement of§37-46. Specifically, given the size and scope of the proposed regulated activity, the application does not address "the review procedures required by the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQR), Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law". Additionally, we question the scope and extent of the engineering work and believe prudence requires a professional engineer's report to determine the foundation structure of the rock/stone pier and whether it is feasible to make a 5'-to-6'penetration of the bay bottom in a straight and continuous line along the north and south facing at the seaward- end of the wharf. In addition, we note the applicant recognizes and acknowledges the need to obtain permit approval from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. However, given the applicant's repeated history of failing to obtain required permits, we would point out that the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically,the applicant has not met the requirement of§97-21(J) to provide "documentM proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been obtained". 4 r .r Respectfully Submitted. 5 ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE � Gy Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa. TOWN CLERK c P.O. Box 1179 W 2 Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS O MARRIAGE OFFICER Fax(516) 765-1823 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER Fax � - Telephgne(516) 765-1800 FREEDOM OF.INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's Office (agency Freedom of Information Officer) . One copy will be returned to you in response to your request, or as an interim response. SECTION I. TO: J l (Department or Officer, if known, that has the information you are1'requ6sting.) RECORD YOU WISH TO INSPECT: Wescribe the record sought. If possible, supply date, file titl tax map number, and any other.-pertinent informatio .) l �7 44 Signature of Applicant: Printed Name: = �i Address: Mailing Address (if different from above):/ Telephone Number: (,?f ! — 71p6 / Date: (� ---------------------------------------------- --- - [ ] APPROVED [ ] APPROVED WITH DELAY* [ ] DENIED* JUN 9 200� ' town Clerk EI zabeth A. Nev Ile Date Freedom of Information Officer, * If delayed or denied see reverse side for explanation. Submission to Southold Town Trustees — 25 April 2001 The Orient Wharf Company ("the applicant"), has submitted two separate applications for a Coastal Erosion Permit and an Amendment to Wetlands Permit#474. The first application, filed 19 March 2001, relates to the water filtration shed; the second application, filed 4 April 2001, relates to the placement of approximately 138 10"x25' spiles along the north and south facing at the seaward-end of the wharf. Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code governs the Wetlands Permit process; Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code governs the Coastal Erosion Permit process. Each chapter of the Southold Town Code clearly sets out the requirements and process for obtaining a permit before undertaking any work We respectfully request that the shed application be denied for the following procedural and substantive reasons. With respect to the Coastal Erosion permit, the application is incomplete under th '-_.-=-" information requirements of§37-40. Specifically,the minimum information requirements of§37-40(A)(2)have not been met. The scale specified for the require," d 4"y map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24,000)"; the map and draw ngs N - ; submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another(1:480)—far too small�'to.- provide a basis for meaningful analysis. Failure to include a properly scaled map does_;: o not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally; the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that`t does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. In making these and subsequent points relating to Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully,point out that §37-43 does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations, procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the"minimum requirements necessary to carry out the purposes of the chapter". Additionally, a properly scaled map would clearly demonstrate that the proposed shed does not meet the Zoning requirements of§100-33. Specifically, the shed does not meet the requirements of§100-33(B) in that the shed is set back less than three (3) feet from the lot line. The application does not meet the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12. Specifically, under the requirement of§37-12(A) it can not be demonstrated and found "that the proposed regulated activity is reasonable and necessary, considering reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location". Permit us to state that we are not opposed to filtration, only filtration that is situated in an illegal structure and location. First, applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed activity is necessary in that all available water tests for Alachlor have been below the threshold for required remediation. Second, even if the need for filtration were to be demonstrated, applicant has a number of reasonable alternatives. As has been pointed out to applicant, these include placement of the filtration system at a location landward of the coastal erosion area; placement of the 1 filters within the building at the end of the wharf; provision of non-potable washdown water and bottled potable water with appropriate signage. In any consideration of these alternatives, it should additionally be recognized that the applicant does not need to bear the cost of remediation as it is borne by Monsanto. Having established that the applicant's proposed location for the shed is neither reasonable nor necessary, we would also point out that applicant's characterization of the structure as an "existing, temporary, portable'6'x8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment" is not accurate. Actually, under provisions of the Southold Town Code, the shed is neither legally existing,temporary or portable. Under §37-6 the definition of an existing structure is"a structure...where construction has not begun but for which a building_permit has been issued prior to the effective date of this chapter" [10-8-19911. Given that the shed does not have a building permit and was installed after the effective date [5-4-2000], it is incorrect to refer to it as "existing". Even if it is determined that the application meets the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12, the application does not meet the removable restrictions of §37-13. Specifically, §37-13(B) states that"within a structural hazard area the construction of non-movable structures or placement of major nonmovable additions to an existing structure is prohibited". Under §37-6 and in as much as the shed is constructed upon a newly poured concrete floor it is not within the definition of being a"movable structure". Applicant's attorney conceded in his 15 February 2001 letter to the Town Attorney that the shed is located within the `structural hazard area"'. Even if the applicant successfully argues that the shed is movable,then the application is incomplete in that it does not meet the relocation requirements of§37-13. Specifically, §37-13(F) requires that the application include "plans for landward relocation [tol be included with each application for a permit". Given the inability of the applicant to meet the standards and restrictions of Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, the applicant still has recourse to appeal and seek variances under §37-30. As an additional matter, we would also point out that the applicant has not met or recognized the need to meet the application and permit requirements of Chapter 46 of the Southold Town Code, relating to Flood Damage Prevention. 'And although we would note the administrator and implementer of this chapter is the Building Inspector, and not the Trustees, the classification of the proposed location of the shed as a"Zone VE" on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (Map Number 36103CO068 G) designates the proposed location of the shed as a coastal high-hazard area with a number of specific requirements to minimize the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. As currently situated and .designed the shed is not in compliance with the basic requirements of Chapter 46 which would require that anything built in Zone VE be built in such a manner that the bottom floor joist be above a specified base flood elevation. Additionally, any supporting 2 structure below base flood elevation must be professionally designed and certified to be of a break-away design to reduce potential damage. As shown in the attached FIRM, the specified base flood elevation for the proposed location is eleven(11) feet. As shown on the topographic map furnished by the applicant, the shed as currently situated is at an elevation of six (6) feet, five feet below the required base flood elevation. As with Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §46-7 contains language that does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations, procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the "minimum requirements adopted for the promotion of the public health, safety and welfare". With respect to the Wetland permit, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically, the requirements of§97-21(1)have not been met in that applicant has failed to accurately describe "any known prior operations conducted on the premises in question and whether any prior licenses or permits have been issued". Nor has the applicant referenced the pending Consent Order in the matter of NYSDEC vs. Orient Wharf Company (NOV# 00 CA 168) and the recent imposition of a$50,000 fine by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for numerous instances of"substantial modification, installation and reconstruction without benefit of permit". Nor has the applicant met the requirements of §97-21(J) in providing "documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been obtained". The application has not been processed properly under the requirements of§97-24. Specifically,the requirement of§97-24(A) for the Conservation Advisory Council "to forward its written report of findings and recommendations with respect to such application"has not been met, and under the requirement of§97-24(B) a public hearing on such application shall be held"upon receipt by the Trustees of the report of the Conservation Advisory Council". The application does not meet the negative determination requirements of§97-28. Specifically, the permit does not meet the requirement of§97-28(E) for a negative determination that granting of such permit"will not substantially increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage". In fact, the Zone VE designation of the proposed location of the shed, and the precautionary design and building requirements set forth in Chapter 46, clearly demonstrate the position of Southold Town that there is a significant danger of flood and storm-tide damage. In addition, we would respectfully point out that the applicant has failed to meet the requirements of Chapter 100 of the Southold Town Code. Specifically, §100-111 provides that planning board site approval is required for any non-residential structure— whether principal or accessory—in the M1 district where the wharf is located and the shed is placed. 3 Finally, it is our understanding that New York's General Municipal Law §239-m and Suffolk County Charter §§1323 to 1332 require a referral by local agencies of all applications for"authorizations which a referring body may issue under the provisions of any...local law"where the proposed action(construction of a shed) will be, among other examples, within 500 feet of any bay in Suffolk County. For the reasons set forth above, and noting that nearly one year has passed since the illegal placement of the shed,we respectfully request that the Trustees deny the application and under provisions of§97-31 instruct the Bay Constable to require immediate compliance and to order the removal of the structure with the imposition of fines as specified in §97-33 for any delay in complying with such order. With respect to the spile placement application,we respectfully request that the spile placement application be deferred and held over for the following procedural and substantive issues have been correctly addressed. As with the first application, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§37-40. Specifically,the minimum information requirements of§37- 40(A)(2) have not been met. The scale specified for the required map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand(1:24,000)"; the map and drawings submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another(1:480). Failure to include.a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, as stated previously, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. The application does not meet the environmental review requirement of§37-46. Specifically, given the size and scope of the proposed regulated activity, the application does not address "the review procedures required by the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQR), Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law". Additionally, we question the scope and extent of the engineering work and believe prudence requires a professional engineer's report to determine the foundation structure of the rock/stone pier and whether it is feasible to make a 5'-to-6' penetration of the bay bottom in a straight and continuous line along the north and south facing at the seaward- end of the wharf. In addition, we note the applicant recognizes and acknowledges the need to obtain permit approval from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. However, given the applicant's repeated history of failing to obtain required permits, we would point out that the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically, the applicant has not met the requirement of§97-21(J)to provide "documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been obtained". 4 Respectfully Submitted. 5 r Attachments Photographs of Shed Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Survey FIRM (Number 36103C0068 G) cc: Southold Town Trustees Orient Wharf Company Board Orient Yacht Club Board Concerned Members of the Orient Yacht Club With annotation of relevant areas for respective action/compliance/enforcement: Jean Cochran (Southold Town Supervisor) Greg Yakaboski (Southold Town Attorney) Ed Forrester(Southold Town Building Inspector) (Southold Town Planning Board) Suffolk County Planning Commission New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Attn.: Charles T. Hamilton, Regional Supervisor Attn.: Karen Murphy, Regional Attorney 6 t I16IUt u, 11w i L—Al d—kyl'.: determine when actuarial rates apply to structures in the zones where eleva- + tions or depths have been established. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at(800)638-6620. 1 A 4 X 4 APPROXIMATE SCALE V 3 % 500 0 500 FEET s., by tq NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE ,RATE MAP SUFFOLK COUNTY, �M. NEW :i YORK 3 (ALL JURISDICTIONS) $ F PANEL 68 OF 1026 ,. (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) CONTAINS: COMMUMTy NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX SOUTHOLD•TOWN OF 36M3 QD68 G f' fe4 -NOTE- THIS MAP INCORPORATES APPROXIMATE BOUNDARIES OF COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM UNITS AND/OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS ESTABLISHED UNDER THE COASTAL BARRIER IMPROVEMENT ACT OF IWO IPL WI-BW Notice to UW:The MAP NUMBER shown below shadd be used when plxinB �p orders: the COMMUNITY NUMBER shown above ahou�be used on Insurnnoe appkaticns for the subject community. r� MAP NUMBER ;k 36103CO068 G 41°07' 30" EHTCME DATE: ORIENT BEACH +' MAY 411998 STATE PARK , 0 0 I,00Z 'S I• yaaew AL-ps.ln pa;epiln;sei fu °Man ent Apncy •a;(s germ siy;;noge s;ua woo jo suol;sentl Trecu paa� a•`. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 000 Microleasing is a unique institution,which fills a unique role in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad oblast. It is the only leasing company which operates as a commercial firm with a socio-economic . objective. 000 Microleasing target market consists of entrepreneurs and small businesses, 1 with a special focus on women-led businesses. It offers this clientele access to credit otherwise unobtainable to them in the form of equipment leases up to $25,000. 000 Microleasing is an experienced leasing company. It has concluded 116 leases: 5 are aid off and 61 are outstanding. Forty percent lessees are women-led businesses. Four yearneasinf temonstrates that it is possible to work with this neglected clientele while maintaining a quality portfolio that any financial ,.firm would envy. The objective is to grow these businesses and to grow with them, in the belief that Russia's development as a political democracy depends on a stable and growing economy at the grass roots level in the regions. To achieve its financial objectives, 000 Microleasing must expan` its sources of funds substantially. The outstanding quality of the leasing portfolio, the WRven experience and expertise of the staff and the valuable service that Microleasing uniquely p should make this an attainable goal. Credit. and equity investment from one or more western fin cial institutions are a critical step. 000 Microleasing aims to raise $5,000,000 over the next three to five years to become a stable financial institution,which can �offer at least $US one miilllio'n�Yvorth of leases annually. 1/t.-Li110 tv-C" (v� ctiS� vim'c� OBJECTIVES + ? To be financially sustainable in 2005 and beyond ? To ensure that 40-50%lessees are women entrepreneurs and women-led businesses ? To expand the firm's leasing market in.St. Petersburg and its suburbs, as.well as regional centers throughout the Leningrad oblast . ? To maintain model linkages and working relationships with local and oblast governments ? To encourage the replication of microleasing programs for small businesses throughout the Russian Federation. 1 In Russia,small business.is.defined.by.number of employees(up to_100),not by.financial indicators. 1 l 44 •^'� c 't err ",�, �`•�''R—` d hwva. v3. . ti a a r kat ip•.r°` r . rx 0r a' ' r�ae"g � 'ri"'Y a 4 ,�es 4 s" v t` � aM 1e�1 ruYY.. ,..� �� 5a�. =y xj re, �� - ?yv'a,Y' � '2t 'c+v ',�+�`{�• yl :Scs zr . , ¢� s� a a��. � '^ 1rr v"�^z'Y'��s ��'�'yy ��.cz+a�.'"� ��`u.#ew vw �Y �3•G ��r� �� ^P£ WONvt#, a` E•' d _ '' � x S rq;5p"a�5^ .�," ' rx "tx: Y -�`"�",. •`"��"�i�zmv'�:" ,,�a °0�';z,'-�s' v}' aye M'y;LGaw�`/ ${ `+,� T•� 1 SY' f ^ w. E,�X b 4 Ri. 8 F Y � ��a Al N 4! b tvN.' ."ryl /SX�-'-33'.y+�.,Fy ��"g ds� e`$ryn�,.7 �"�,,$ ° '•#�(� ♦ .�,a'a,Y �+ `�'i eT ��r'T"'Y�'� � R�M�,� ,��,�'I�° •• • "di u ,�i �"��r�'"'°,�� r. �Za� �' r�,a��§ �r ��` ��, .,� �� -,,,Faa We Mph f21 • 1 1 • •. •• • • 1 1• • •• • • • - ••1 0 Volkhovty and region (pop 120,000� By the end of 2000, 341 registered small businesses and 1,517 registered sole proprietors, compared to 285 businesses and 1,294 proprietors in 1997. The city is the site of a major aluminum factory and women's garment manufacturing plant. It has a strategy to encourage the growth of small business over the next ten years, with particular attention to construction, renovation, repair services,tourism infrastructure. The city is located in a rural area on the banks of the Volkhov river. Gatchina and Tosno(pop 324,600) Gatchina and Tosno are not far from St. Petersburg,have a higher standard of living than the rest of the oblast and°fictive small business communitie- The level of clients resources and know- how is higher here than in other regions. These cities attract major international investors such as Caterpillar, and other domestic industries. The Gatchina Business Development Center is part o1h;,p— 000 Microleasing partner network. 000 Microleasing has concluded one lease .deal in Gatchina. Tixvin, city and region(pop. 84,400) This region has the highest level of unemployment in the oblast(36.8%), so the Leningrad oblast government has instituted special measures, including tax breaks, to encourage the development of small business and job creation. There is an affiliate of the St. Petersburg Kirovsk tractor factory, and two aluminum plants in the towns of Pikalevskii and Boksitogorsk. The Tixvin Business Development Center is part of the Microleasing partner network and conducts extremely professional business training courses. T ate, 000 Microleasing has concluded four leases in Tixvin. Luga, city and region(pop. 127,200) Located at the southern tip of the oblast, Luga is a rural area. It is the prime recreation area of the oblast, with hotels, rest homes, sanitoria. One quarter of all Russian metal working firms are in Luga. The business development center in Luga is part of the 000 Microleasing partner network and has produced one leasing client. Lodeinoe Pole,town and re 'on W. 66,500) Lodeinoe Pole is an agricultural area, 70% forested, at the northern end of 000 Microleasing territory. 000 Microleasing has four leases in Lodeinoe Pole. Vyborg, city and region(pop. 200,000) Located on the border with Finland, this as very entrepreneurial area and developing rapidly economically. There is a large branch of the St. Petersburg Herzen Institute, whose director is well-known to Microleasingaand is conducting a high level of business training, management and finance. There is an active business development center whose management is also a known quantity and which is eager to work with 000 Microleasing. The Leningrad oblast government has targeted this area for development and investment, construction of a new port is underway, and there is substantial international`participation. Vybora is a promising target for 000 3 Submission to Southold Town Trustees — 25 April 2001 The Orient Wharf Company ("the applicant"), has submitted two separate applications for a Coastal Erosion Permit and an Amendment to Wetlands Permit#474. The first application, filed 19 March 2001, relates to the water filtration shed; the second application, filed 4 April 2001, relates to the placement of approximately 138 10N25' spiles along the north and south facing at the seaward-end of the wharf. Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code governs the Wetlands Permit process; Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code governs the Coastal Erosion Permit process. Each chapter of the Southold Town Code clearly sets out the requirements and process for obtaining a permit before undertaking any work We respectfully request that the shed application be denied for the following procedural and substantive reasons. With respect to the Coastal Erosion permit, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§37-40. Specifically, the minimum information requirements of§37-40(A)(2) have not been met. The scale specified for the required map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24,000)"; the map and drawings submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another(1:480)—far too small to provide a basis for meaningful analysis. Failure to include a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. In making these and subsequent points relating to Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §37-43 does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations,procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the "minimum requirements necessary to carry out the purposes of the chapter". Additionally, a properly scaled map would clearly demonstrate that the proposed shed does not meet the Zoning requirements of§100-33. Specifically, the shed does not meet the requirements of§100-33(B) in that the shed is set back less than three (3) feet from the lot line. The application does not meet the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12. Specifically, under the requirement of§37-12(A) it can not be demonstrated and found "that the proposed regulated activity is reasonable and necessary, considering; reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location". Permit us to state that we are not opposed to filtration, only filtration that is situated in an illegal structure and location. First, applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed activity is necessary in that all available water tests for Alachlor have been below the threshold for required remediation. Second, even if the need for filtration were to be demonstrated, applicant has a number of reasonable alternatives. As has been pointed out to applicant, these include placement of the filtration system at a location landward of the coastal erosion area; placement of the 1 filters within the building at the end of the wharf, provision of non-potable washdown water and bottled potable water with appropriate signage. In any consideration of these alternatives, it should additionally be recognized that the applicant does not need to bear the cost of remediation as it is borne by Monsanto. Having established that the applicant's proposed location for the shed is neither reasonable nor necessary, we would also point out that applicant's characterization of the structure as an "existing, temporary, portable 6'x8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment" is not accurate. Actually, under provisions of the Southold Town Code,the shed is neither legally existing, temporary or portable. Under §37-6 the definition of an existing structure is "a structure...where construction has not begun but for which a building_permit has been issued prior to the effective date of this chapter" [10-8-1991]. Given that the shed does not have a building permit and was installed after the effective date [5-4-2000], it is incorrect to refer to it as "existing". Even if it is determined that the application meets the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12, the application does not meet the removable restrictions of §37-13. Specifically, §37-13(B) states that"within a structural hazard area the construction of nonmovable structures or placement of major nonmovable additions to an existing structure is prohibited". Under §37-6 and in as much as the shed is constructed upon a newly poured concrete floor it is not within the definition of being a"movable structure". Applicant's attorney conceded in his 15 February 2001 letter to the Town Attorney that the shed is located within the `structural hazard area"'. Even if the applicant successfully argues that the shed is movable,then the application is incomplete in that it does not meet the relocation requirements of§37-13. Specifically, §37-13(F) requires that the application include "plans for landward relocation [tol be included with each application for a permit". Given the inability of the applicant to meet the standards and restrictions of Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, the applicant still has recourse to appeal and seek variances under §37-30. As an additional matter, we would also point out that the applicant has not met or recognized the need to meet the application and permit requirements of Chapter 46 of the Southold Town Code, relating to Flood Damage Prevention. And although we would note the administrator and implementer of this chapter is the Building Inspector, and not the Trustees, the classification of the proposed location of the shed as a"Zone VE" on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (Map Number 36103CO068 G) designates the proposed location of the shed as a coastal high-hazard area with a number of specific requirements to minimize the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. As currently situated and designed the shed is not in compliance with the basic requirements of Chapter 46 which would require that anything built in Zone VE be built in such a manner that the bottom floor joist be above a specified base flood elevation. Additionally, any supporting 2 structure below base flood elevation must be professionally designed and certified to be of a break-away design to reduce potential damage. As shown in the attached FIRM, the specified base flood elevation for the proposed location is eleven(11) feet. As shown on the topographic map furnished by the applicant,the shed as currently situated is at an elevation of six (6) feet, five feet below the required base flood elevation. As with Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §46-7 contains language that does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations, procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the "minimum requirements adopted for the promotion of the public health, safety and welfare". With respect to the Wetland permit, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically,the requirements of§97-21(I)have not been met in that applicant has failed to accurately describe "any known prior ,operations conducted on the premises in question and whether M prior licenses or permits have been issued". Nor has the applicant referenced the pending Consent Order in the matter of NYSDEC vs. Orient Wharf Company (NOV#00 CA 168) and the recent imposition of a$50,000 fine by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for numerous instances of"substantial modification, installation and reconstruction without benefit of permit". Nor has the applicant met the requirements of §97-21(J) in providing "documentary proof that all other necessM permits and approvals have been obtained". The application has not been processed properly under the requirements of§97-24. Specifically, the requirement of§97-24(A) for the Conservation Advisory Council "to forward its written report of findings and recommendations with respect to such application"has not been met, and under the requirement of§97-24(B) a public hearing on such application shall be held"upon receipt by the Trustees of the report of the Conservation Advisory Council". The application does not meet the negative determination requirements of§97-28. Specifically, the permit does not meet the requirement of§97-28(E) for a negative determination that granting of such permit"will not substantially increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage". In fact, the Zone VE designation of the proposed location of the shed, and the precautionary design and building requirements set forth in Chapter 46, clearly demonstrate the position of Southold Town that there is a significant danger of flood and storm-tide damage. In addition, we would respectfully point out that the applicant has failed to meet the requirements of Chapter 100 of the Southold Town Code. Specifically, §100-111 provides that planning board site approval is required for any non-residential structure— whether principal or accessory—in the M1 district where the wharf is located and the shed is placed. 3 Finally, it is our understanding that New York's General Municipal Law §239-m and Suffolk County Charter §§1323 to 1332 require a referral by local agencies of all applications for"authorizations which a referring body may issue under the provisions of any...local law" where the proposed action (construction of a shed) will be, among other examples, within 500 feet of any bay in Suffolk County. For the reasons set forth above, and noting that nearly one year has passed since the illegal placement of the shed,we respectfully request that the Trustees deny the application and under provisions of§97-31 instruct the Bay Constable to require immediate compliance and to order the removal of the structure with the imposition of fines as specified in §97-33 for any delay in complying with such order. With respect to the spile placement application,we respectfully request that the spile placement application be deferred and held over for the following procedural and substantive issues have been correctly addressed. As with the first application, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§37-40. Specifically, the minimum information requirements of§37- 40(A)(2) have not been met. The scale specified for the required map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24,000)"; the map and drawings submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another(1:480). Failure to include a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, as stated previously, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. The application does not meet the environmental review requirement of§37-46. Specifically, given the size and scope of the proposed regulated activity, the application does not address "the review procedures required by the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR), Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law". Additionally, we question the scope and extent of the engineering work and believe prudence requires a professional engineer's report to determine the foundation structure of the rock/stone pier and whether it is feasible to make a 5'-to-6'penetration of the bay bottom in a straight and continuous line along the north and south facing at the seaward- end of the wharf. In addition, we note the applicant recognizes and acknowledges the need to obtain permit approval from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. However, given the applicant's repeated history of failing to obtain required permits, we would point out that the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically, the applicant has not met the requirement of§97-21(J) to provide "documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been obtained". 4 Respectfully Submitted. 5 Submission to Southold Town Trustees — 25 April 2001 The Orient Wharf Company ("the applicant"), has submitted two separate applications for a Coastal Erosion Permit and an Amendment to Wetlands Permit#474. The first application, filed 19 March 2001, relates to the water filtration shed; the second application, filed 4 April 2001, relates to the placement of approximately 138 10"x25' spiles along the north and south facing at the seaward-end of the wharf. Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code governs the Wetlands Permit process; Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code governs the Coastal Erosion Permit process. Each chapter of the Southold Town Code clearly sets out the requirements and process for obtaining a permit before undertaking any work We respectfully request that the shed application be denied for the following procedural and substantive reasons. With respect to the Coastal Erosion permit, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§37-40. Specifically, the minimum information requirements of§37-40(A)(2) have not been met. The scale specified for the required map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24,000)"; the map and drawings submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another(1:480)—far too small to provide a basis for meaningful analysis. Failure to include a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. In making these and subsequent points relating to Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §37-43 does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations, procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the "minimum requirements necessary to carry out the purposes of the chapter". Additionally, a properly scaled map would clearly demonstrate that the proposed shed does not meet the Zoning requirements of§100-33. Specifically, the shed does not meet the requirements of§100-33(B) in that the shed is set back less than three (3) feet from the lot line. The application does not meet the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12. Specifically, under the requirement of§37-12(A) it can not be demonstrated and found "that the proposed regulated activity is reasonable and necessary, considering reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location". Permit us to state that we are not opposed to filtration, only filtration that is situated in an illegal structure and location. First, applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed activity is necessary in that all available water tests for Alachlor have been below the threshold for required remediation. Second, even if the need for filtration were to be demonstrated, applicant has a number of reasonable alternatives. As has been pointed out to applicant,these include placement of the filtration system at a location landward of the coastal erosion area; placement of the 1 filters within the building at the end of the wharf, provision of non-potable washdown water and bottled potable water with appropriate signage. In any consideration of these alternatives, it should additionally be recognized that the applicant does not need to bear the cost of remediation as it is borne by Monsanto. Having established that the applicant's proposed location for the shed is neither reasonable nor necessary, we would also point out that applicant's characterization of the structure as an "existing, temporary, portable 6'x8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment" is not accurate. Actually, under provisions of the Southold Town Code, the shed is neither legally existing, temporary or portable. Under §37-6 the definition of an existing structure is "a structure...where construction has not begun but for which a building_permit has been issued prior to the effective date of this chapter" [10-8-19911. Given that the shed does not have a building permit and was installed after the effective date [5-4-2000], it is incorrect to refer to it as "existing". Even if it is determined that the application meets the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12, the application does not meet the removable restrictions of §37-13. Specifically, §37-13(B) states that"within a structural hazard area the construction of nonmovable structures or placement of major nonmovable additions to an existing structure is prohibited". Under §37-6 and in as much as the shed is constructed upon a newly poured concrete floor it is not within the definition of being a"movable structure". Applicant's attorney conceded in his 15 February 2001 letter to the Town Attorney that the shed is located within the `structural hazard area"'. Even if the applicant successfully argues that the shed is movable, then the application is incomplete in that it does not meet the relocation requirements of§37-13. Specifically, §37-13(F) requires that the application include "plans for landward relocation [to] be included with each application for a permit". Given the inability of the applicant to meet the standards and restrictions of Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, the applicant still has recourse to appeal and seek variances under §37-30. As an additional matter, we would also point out that the applicant has not met or recognized the need to meet the application and permit requirements of Chapter 46 of the Southold Town Code, relating to Flood Damage Prevention. And although we would note the administrator and implementer of this chapter is the Building Inspector, and not the Trustees, the classification of the proposed location of the shed as a"Zone VE" on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (Map Number 36103CO068 G) designates the proposed location of the shed as a coastal high-hazard area with a number of specific requirements to minimize the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. As currently situated and designed the shed is not in compliance with the basic requirements of Chapter 46 which would require that anything built in Zone VE be built in such a manner that the bottom floor joist be above a specified base flood elevation. Additionally, any supporting 2 structure below base flood elevation must be professionally designed and certified to be of a break-away design to reduce potential damage. As shown in the attached FIRM, the specified base flood elevation for the proposed location is eleven(11) feet. As shown on the topographic map furnished by the applicant, the shed as currently situated is at an elevation of six (6) feet, five feet below the required base flood elevation. As with Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §46-7 contains language that does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations,procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the "minimum requirements adopted for the promotion of the public health, safety and welfare". With respect to the Wetland permit, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically, the requirements of§97-21(I) have not been met in that applicant has failed to accurately describe"any known prior operations conducted on the premises in question and whether any prior licenses or permits have been issued". Nor has the applicant referenced the pending Consent Order in the matter of NYSDEC vs. Orient Wharf Company (NOV# 00 CA 168) and the recent imposition of a$50,000 fine by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for numerous instances of"substantial modification, installation and reconstruction without benefit of permit". Nor has the applicant met the requirements of §97-21(J) in providing "documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been obtained". The application has not been processed properly under the requirements of§97-24. Specifically, the requirement of§97-24(A) for the Conservation Advisory Council "to forward its written report of findings and recommendations with respect to such application" has not been met, and under the requirement of§97-24(B) a public hearing on such application shall be held "upon receipt by the Trustees of the report of the Conservation Advisory Council". The application does not meet the negative determination requirements of§97-28. Specifically, the permit does not meet the requirement of§97-28(E) for a negative determination that granting of such permit"will not substantially increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage". In fact,the Zone VE designation of the proposed location of the shed, and the precautionary design and building requirements set forth in Chapter 46, clearly demonstrate the position of Southold Town that there is a significant danger of flood and storm-tide damage. In addition, we would respectfully point out that the applicant has failed to meet the requirements of Chapter 100 of the Southold Town Code. Specifically, §100-111 provides that planning board site approval is required for any non-residential structure— whether principal or accessory—in the M 1 district where the wharf is located and the shed is placed. 3 Finally, it is our understanding that New York's General Municipal Law §239-m and Suffolk County Charter §§1323 to 1332 require a referral by local agencies of all applications for"authorizations which a referring body may issue under the provisions of any...local law"where the proposed action (construction of a shed) will be, among other examples, within 500 feet of any bay in Suffolk County. For the reasons set forth above, and noting that nearly one year has passed since the illegal placement of the shed,we respectfully request that the Trustees deny the application and under provisions of§97-31 instruct the Bay Constable to require immediate compliance and to order the removal of the structure with the imposition of fines as specified in §97-33 for any delay in complying with such order. With respect to the spile placement application,we respectfully request that the spile placement application be deferred and held over for the following procedural and substantive issues have been correctly addressed. As with the first application, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§37-40. Specifically,the minimum information requirements of§37- 40(A)(2)have not been met. The scale specified for the required map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24,000)"; the map and drawings submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another (1:480). Failure to include a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, as stated previously, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. The application does not meet the environmental review requirement of§37-46. Specifically, given the size and scope of the proposed regulated activity, the application does not address "the review procedures required by the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQR), Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law". Additionally, we question the scope and extent of the engineering work and believe prudence requires a professional engineer's report to determine the foundation structure of the rock/stone pier and whether it is feasible to make a 5'-to-6'penetration of the bay bottom in a straight and continuous line along the north and south facing at the seaward- end of the wharf. In addition, we note the applicant recognizes and acknowledges the need to obtain permit approval from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. However, given the applicant's repeated history of failing to obtain required permits, we would point out that the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically,the applicant has not met the requirement of§97-21(J) to provide "documentM proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been obtained". 4 Respectfully Submitted. 5