Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG-06/30/2026 WS Denis Noncarrow Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Town Clerk " , P.O. Box 1179 Registrar of Vital Statistics ` Southold, New York 11971 Marriage Officer ; Fax (631) 765-6145 Records Management Officer Telephone (631) 765-1800 Freedom of Information Officer COUN www.southoldtownny.gov Office of the Town Clerk Town of Southold Agenda Work Session Agenda Southold Town Board June 30, 2026 9:00 AM PUBLIC NOTICE: The Town Board Work Session will be held in the Southold Town Hall Annex Basement Meeting Room, located at 54375 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. PUBLIC ZOOM LINK: You are invited to a Zoom webinar! When: Jun 30, 2026 09:00 AM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Topic: Town Board Work Session Join from PC, Mac, iPad, or Android: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/86768869956?pwd=OVvWFY5a0jZnUPOeRwWnkrFYVx9LeW.1 Passcode:587163 I. Discussion Items- Southold Town Board Work Session 1. 09:00 AM- Members of the Agricultural Advisory Committee Zoning Update-Agriculture Recommendations 2. 09:30 AM-Nick Krupski, Solid Waste Coordinator Commercial Garbage Fees 3. 09:45 AM- Councilwoman Alexa Suess, Councilman Brian Mealy and Town Clerk Denis Noncarrow Communications Committee Member Recommendations 4. 10:00 AM- Town Board Break 5. 10:15 AM- Councilwoman Anne Smith, Transportation Commission Member Eric McClure and ATA Julie McGivney Draft Policy for Co-Naming of Town Streets 6. 10:30 AM- Councilwoman Anne Smith, Councilman Brian Mealy, Recreation Supervisor Janet Douglass, Director of DPW Erick Haas and Government Page 1 of 7 Liaison Gwynn Schroeder Possible Grant Application Support Revised Version of the MPR Grant 7. 11:00 AM- Councilman Brian Mealy Update from the Peconic Estuary Program Local Government Committee Meeting on June loth/Suffolk County Health Department IA System Grant Program 8. 11:15 AM- Supervisor Krupski Public Safety Task Force Update 9. Executive Session -Labor-Matters Involving the Employment of a Particular Person(s) 11:30 AM - Leslie Weisman, ZBA Chairperson 10. Town Board Luneh Bire*k Executive Session -Legal Advice 12:00 PM - Michelle Nickonovitz, Town Comptroller and Natalie Kenney, Principal Account Clerk 11. Executive Session -Labor-Matters Involving the Employment/Appointment of a Particular Person(s) 12:30 PM - Jacqui Martinez, Senior Citizens Program Director 12:45 PM - Town Attorney Ben Johnson 01:00 PM - Councilwoman Alexa Suess re: Communications Committee 0 1:15 PM - Supervisor Krupski re: Historic Preservation Commission 01:30 PM - Lillian McCullough, Land Preservation Executive Assistant 12. Executive Session - Potential Acquisition(s), Sale or Lease of Real Property Where Publicity Would Substantially Affect the Value Thereof 01:45 PM - Lillian McCullough, Land Preservation Executive Assistant 13. Executive Session -Legal Advice 02:15 PM - Kayla Griffin, Assistant Town Attorney re: FOIL Appeal Page 2 of 7 v - 5 (o -30 - a (o Proposed Guidelines for Co-Naming of Town Streets 1. Posthumous Honor Almost every policy we've reviewed required that the honoree be deceased, with the period of time since death varying. Three to five years seems to be the norm. 2. Record of Community Service/impact Other jurisdictions' guidelines tend to set a fairly high bar for qualification. New York City Council guidelines require that the honoree was a native or long-time city resident or "an individual of particular importance to a significant population of New York City," and that the person made a meaningful contribution to city life (in the areas arts, science, culture, politics, education, society, health, or safety), or knowingly risked their life to save another person, or engaged in "extensive community involvement or activism," or was a uniformed service member who died in the line of duty. Some guidelines establish a minimum period of impact, such as at least 10 years of community involvement. Submission of a detailed biography of the proposed honoree is a common requirement, as well. 3. Community Support for the Honor Most guidelines prescribe a minimum threshold for local support for the honoree, usually in the form of petition signatures, generally from the immediate area adjacent to the location of the street for which co-naming is being proposed. The numbers we reviewed varied quite a bit, with examples ranging from 20 to 150 signatures. It's probably a good idea to keep in mind the population density of a community in this regard, as several hundred people could live in one apartment building in New York City. Many guidelines include an additional requirement in the form of letters of support from local civic organizations, religious institutions, elected officials, businesses, or other entities. 4. Process for Designation In New York City, the process for designation typically follows this sequence: application for co-naming is made to the local Community Board (there are 59 boards covering the city), where the application is most commonly reviewed by the board's Transportation Committee before being voted on by the full board. Board-approved applications are then introduced as a resolution by the local City Council Member for a vote by the full City Council, and then co-naming resolutions passed by the Council are signed by the mayor. The Transportation Committee (or in our case, the Transportation Commission) doesn't quite feel like the right place for review, since a co-naming is much more a cultural matter than a transportation issue. Page 3 of 7 5. Sign Installation For approved co-naming designations, the Department of Transportation or Highway Department produces a single street sign for installation and typically makes replica signs available to the family of the honoree at cost. The co-naming sign is generally affixed to the pole holding the actual street sign just below the existing sign, in one location only. ` q ' UAft N` 11 E n l u e NO PARKING 6. A Caveat About the Co-Naming process One thing that most Community Boards and Council Members encounter in the co-naming process is the difficulty of saying no to an applicant. These are typically folks who've lost a loved one in the not-so-distant past, so even if the proposed honoree may be someone who's not really deserving of being memorialized in such a public and permanent way, it can be deeply uncomfortable to reject the application. That's something the town board may want to consider, and setting a relatively high bar for qualifying an honoree likely will limit the number of marginal applications. Page 4 of 7 v7 Goose Creek _. Discharge Elimination Southold �,•« .} _ _- of ol-luflion an-, nt- 041 0 PEP funded 3 of the 7 2 elimination sites. _ Project is complete, next 0" sites in planning are Town and Jockey Creek. Figure 1:The seven outfalls in the Goose Creek Subcatchment in Southold,outfalls to be eliminated with the PEP-BIL funding(041,042,and 046)are indicated. $ _ Pe conic Estuary Page 5 of 7 �F $ W \ r S \ \\ , Goose reed Discharge Elimination -Total Project Benefit This project eliminates 38.26 acre-feet of stormwater runoff to Goose Greek each year e atos 12,467,057 gallons annually! # 0 Peconic Estuary Nrtne,hip Page 6 of 7 econi Estuary Updates Suffolk County Septic Improvement Program olo 1 Environmental 1 Suffolk County Department of Health Services Page 7 of 7