Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5
Area= Note: ALL SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES; UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION RAW Or JM 0f0(Epgr JM WATER SUPPLY, SANITARY SYSTEMS, TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF DRAINAAPRIL 2024 55,849 sq.1`. SHOWNGARED FROM LS AND UTILITIES,FIELD OBSERVATIONS SECTION 72LA OF THE NEW PORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. a°FU taTE AND OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING THE LAND SEAL OR pPo1MN0.: 24\MAIN ROAD 1 .28 acres EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL INOT DBE CONSIDERED THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHTS OF WAY TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. Plot ROW Feb 2026 AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD IF ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. GUARANTEES INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY HE Datum NAVD 1988 I ER COMPANY, GOVEPARED, AND ERNMENTN HIS AL AAGENCY LF TO TAND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI— TUTION. GUARANTEES ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE. 0 *)3\04 I �ggd' T11 1 `♦V I A� l o /•♦gyp ��\fi, ,' .�62 {� � • I 9`t1 3\N54 �•y'a�\ � 31N4 // /// � \ \ 1 A r / - 1 \ 10 40 �`JS � `I � \ �-�' A\ •y/,� 34�0\ //,� sag° ��3y01 �.\ I 4\ job �34 f \1 6 1 \ \ \ \ e\ \ ♦ �64 G9y\� �• � 1 � \ \ \ \ fi \ q6f ¢� \\ �a• 1A �yj3 Ak \ \ \ \ \ \\ fig + I \j�\\ p �O ♦♦� f1�,� (G9h\ 3513 \\ 35N6A l \� \3tiA\\\\ \\� \ V�� • to �\\ IN V1. 153\ +t5\1 l56\ 256fi Q� 05 S35 3 3y� \ \\ / `f` I 1 \\ \\ \\ \I \\ �y'4 +y5y4 �26�27 �91 ' 51 35• \ �34� + 1 "� + 1 I 35691 + N�� tit r , 2g.9//, "T6' A5+ °\ea z 35 � I 2 i l�/ T516 1533 �` r "Pfi5 \\ \\f\\ 6\\ tpb Sa \1 ty& 1 \ \ 1 1 !� �A d 48 y511 35 �3y+5 \ \ / ry Ly 34. 35�g4 I 344A 35 1 3A R\ \ \ 1030 3y1A 355gg +1559 G 35� i 3513 \\ too' 3 O\\ y3 +1y03 7.9' W\ \ Q I + SAR\ 010 15• � \ 1 N 1 IN \ggfi O\ \ \ I 1 ° 1 + \ 1 g 1 � \ 1fi\ °5 35 ' I 3515 00 woo ` G r o\\\\\ 6 �o*l�°Q ®iVA�ro\ \\ \\\\ \ = ter 6\ 45\ \ 15A\ \ \ \ \ 1 Q she \ IA / \ \\ \ \fi99 y / 3A. c30 3«p°ce 1fi --34-4� 1 \ �f \ \ \ � L \eaga� Aga AO1 ao� �\ �>p���\� P°s\�•q^N�2 \ \ \ \ \\ - �(�°�� 01 Sb• 3A. Ay1 /y4a1w 33 \ a a \ \ \ Z 51 ay 3 g4 O\\ \ \ \ v* \ \ 1A 35• � � 3� 3341 � \ �\ +1y�4 +1y. 1• \ \ \ \� � QG +141 q\ I A [ 1 O 3506 / r G 7 I fig h i t 3413 ✓ I a \' 0\ �O`°\�s S w 1A0 (° 15' Q yA65 I 3313 \� 61 \ 3054g 63 ° Tb. +\9N\ p♦ 33g5 , '�fi g3 f 3316 \\\ `\ 5 (e9 W 15 1 O ♦♦� 35`�fi N. �•' 33. ` 0• EB a 3A&� 339fi 33yfi �\ \ \ (ne '4-* 15o O pp V' �13 r 41i a �° 3AOfi 1\5 36 Q 33g3 5 61 3fi\5 �A01Aa Vol, 33gg 9 c�°m° e°u°tom 34.3g \b`\ � 35h 5 `� 3•ye1`/� ,�55 \�� A \ \\ \ 15�1 � \ \ 346�\ N1 10 35\A 3yy5 36 39 \\ \ 1 �, 01 f5 4' 33 s A11 g6 co° 31g\ \ \ °L \ vJN (J•�'\ \ 'iy'15�\ 0.0 1513 S�OR� ,�6 16fii3 1g11 +1O G ,t,� O33 5A31 i yA 51g 3fi 1\ ��,O a(� \31 �ti\ 31 / 1A 3\ 66� 31 O . \ 0 151 1 Oj •� � 3323 335g s\ed' ��° 3 5 �ti5 '— �' 31Afi 3fi1 0� 311fi O 33�. 315gN.Y 331s3 \\ 33 k rO 31� +'Lko QS 34, p� r 4\ 15\ 'a� 3A 3 °��\e "1y 30—1� ca` 4 'P L o 1 1 15. �1'� 6g3AAy 3 O 10 W om/ '5! / \ :0 33 4151 0. �otry \V / 1A� 1461\bN A5 331�\. `\ T33 y136 0� O M Ag 1�31g6A 1 \ 1g91 + \ p 1100- 1�81 31 0 a�os 3 �p� a 3111 31• 3 / 29—` ,"AS 15.0 31g1 '�L 10 36 31• , 'LON ti Afi1 1A50 A °\KAY(A °+�+ ao� j36�1 3\51 5y 3 3 �o°�0 11ry t°�fi / y e e\e 40\ ♦ �p7 0 1310 fi° i ♦ / e\(eta cA 1Atk 1 �� 0115 51 \1�'A 384 fi° 3! oQ 1 1113 15`0�I\ 1 /h 1A°61 V 31• '�"� 39. r 3 333� (�95\^� .wry+ �,1�• �1\\ �ZS� 14� �e oP�p° 13g5 13• 16fi 15�\ 1Ajg 1A 9 ometA 31g5 g6 305gg0 e\eQs — t\o9Qa 3 /3ti 3 acm° �° \ gig° 1A15 1 Q 1qM j16ti1g5 3�6fi�� /-3310— ry rod 31� V. 1 �o 311�1 .32' / \ �A•(tj mosp° 1`'�° \e°P 1\ 1Aa1 D "3\� 11a\ \ 15N% +1y45 '3 3l� p1 1�5A\ 3 e 3155 11 1fi°01 A,S p p♦♦, «off 5\90 15 ` • p 12fi11 1' 1123 11f5 b� 1fi 01 Op 1y15fi1e\\ $61 • QL5� a V�� 10N \e � 16 �$ry 1fi% +1661 p MAR'� 3 0 2026 1'J \ �meo\ SOUTHOLD TOWN p' PLANNING BOARD Topographic +11g1 Survey of Property Situate at Southold LAND SURVEYING Town of Southold V OF tv Mintoville@aol.com Suffolk County, New York SUBDIVISIONS � s ,.'r TITLE & MORTGAGE SURVEYS Tax Map #10 0 0-61 -01 - 15.2 & 15.5 '. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS x. SITE PLANS April 25, 2024 Scale 1 "= 20' John Minto, L.S. Jacqueline Marie Minto, L.S. ;° .._f' � GRAPHIC SCALE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ,C'O� 19 r2 NEW YORK STATE LIC. NO. 49866 NEW YORK STATE LIC. NO. 51085 20 0 10 20 40 80 Phone: (631) 724-4832 ' P.O. Box 1408 Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. PLOT TO 22"X34"PAGE �°--8 � o o a i s q o f as a o v w c v E a v v m ¢ v o w c o rn « A F c ° E c $ o o �'v o o'o E o m E c v rn' v E c v Y , a 'o v E o a w a s rnL m E o « t _ 0 o 0 E $a E E ° _ o rn E aa, v a o o v o u a o E o v o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 E o � a°= ` E m y o E -o E o+c v« . " 3 „ *0. *0. *0. *0. • *0. • *0. *0. • *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. • *0. • *0. *0. • *0. *0. *0. *0. • *0. • *0. *0. *0. • *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. • *0. *0. *0. • *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. • *0. E m w a a 5 E m v o Of 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 " v � � � -5 v v - v • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Aa<v-' Sid � E 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -; a o v 3 E q d a t c « « N v�- Wi z - a u E E rn v « rn �a 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ` £ " « a v£ E E n v « a Y c E v - 3 E E v m v WT� cm ZEo :° �a rnojO A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 =t ` E- -6 A v A N A q ` > d u c rnt 3 3 ¢= g v t N o E = a t . oio .,.: _. _... c c a c N c o o q a - _ �o� � � c oav � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Q:1 0 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ( a a y o q a F °s w E E 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0' 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' 0.0 ' 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.01,. 0. ' 0.0 OA 0. - 0:0 0.0:- -0.1 Q.1 0.1 0.1'_ 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 ' 0.1 0!2 0.2 0.1 .1 0.1 0.1 ` 0.1 0:1 0.1 , 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 '0.1 0.1 '0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0_ _ 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 __......__..- M..____,_.._, 0.2 0.2 02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0:2 0.2 0.2 0:1 0.2 G.� 0.� 0. . 02 02 0,1 Q.1 0.1 0.1, 0.1 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N Q N o.a a x a,z f ' �• • • • • • • • • • • i. • • • • • • - -- • • • • • •' • • • • • • • • • • • N 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,x oa' o.a 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 =0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 '0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 No N N N N m A4 0.4 N 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0, a.r o.r a,r 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 -1.0 ,', 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.2 Q.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0`1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 f,. �n a N co f, L `9.2 �',1 i,,0 „ 0,6 0.8 ....... 16 ti... _.. '~' m E"'-- .., 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0: 0.6 0.6 0.8 7.4 -� `i.rc, 1.2 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.6 1.3 0,9 0.8 0.9 1.2 0.8 0.5' 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 J A5 a1 N li 2.5 4.t7 - ,,a 1 3' Lt�::, i -p harking Lot: _�. -_ 5 � w o - • • • • • • • • ¢. • • • • • • N 6 r"'��"S a 43 « 7-7 100 : G.G Q.G Q.G Q.Q Q.G� O.Q G.Q... 4.8 a.3 3.1 a.0 %.3 U.F OJ 0.6 Q.9 '3., i:a..... 0.F t.U.. 1., 1,4 1'' S.6 1., 15 l.a 1.2 1.i ,.1 !.a 1.3 i5 1.6 /,? ,,3 t2 , .,.: t.3 'Lr ,. " . ",�, ',r 0.1 0.0 G.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 6Y._ F2 l +r \� t�re}o--�. --- ...._....... N O ...... F , r.ar , c __.. - .. WP F2 .. e.i s.l 3s ax l.a 1.0 o.r oe ae .r.� °%a' O *' to ' A5Ln �A5'. -a3 CD • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4+ O O a k - .. _....... i ..., . . . Y . . . _. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0' 0.0 0:0. t , a,o a.o -s,o .4,.1.__ .0 2.z 1,a as o� 'i,a I 'i,, O N g .. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 „ 1 p.9 0.1 ,.• . ,........ ... •. _..,.. _...._... ....... ......... ... ...... .._ _.......\ 2.2.....t:6 Co 0.8 0.6 0.5 O.zi�-......,U,.�., O.G � ._. _ _._ '._ ,�1.. ., ,.. �...., : C • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4J 41 Y R B e , , . C S r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0' OA, 00 o;a 1 os o,, o,, a . a as , ,os w s,.. _ - a o 23 45 L.L _ 0 _. I . - ...... ® e k B -. ...., ______--_. . .�C7�'...., a 0. 4 o,t O.a t a a; ,.., ........... .... .............. r ...,."..""!!.3$' � ...,._.... ...._ .�' Jaa O,A... }a ...- 61 U 4 ,, ,.. a.6..,,•Q, ,0 Ca.._.....0.8 ..O.Z_._.....4,5 t..i 0 9 o`o • • • • • • • : ;o.. WM WM 28 i- k 5 7 WM w I •. • • • • • e R - t e + d _ Y WM Y Y ., a • La . a k f d a f Y__ f . Y s . kLO ..� }.® ,.. i,q ).� i,.9 U.N 9.. 4,?� ,.l ;t,0 U.l % -''' � ,� .� ,-i,' .. r'�„._..d�i.4,,... ...3 P, ti: .v .3 04 x. U. 9 :8 A3 :%. t. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .,�.. a r l a) o, a.a a.a a.i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . r,�ta L ., A z t1.5 t ).3 Y ...-26. B f Y ` Y . 'S.. » -,,,.. ., _. .,..... ....... \.. O at. O I n a a.a ( i s .. r n. o n o t. n n o i � , � ,,, •, „ �. co ... 12'4 O,i U i , _. ,� a, ,a t: a,0 U a a a, 1 a .4, a.. 0,. U 9 t,A ,..G,a ,Ca;�-, a., t,. ,z L.. � .,, .<,..� �,« .t,4 �E _ _ _ • • • • • • • L - ♦ • • • c� -a e..,- a, Y .. ` ._. �Y. e. k R. f e e f e + B ..,a...... \ B - „ .._.. ll,z_. �>S ,, - ...U.7 9. 0 Z ii. 0. 3. U.i � ti.i 11.1 .: M�„ :.8 •._... ,..... :. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � .. a )� 9a,a _ a 4:a 11 _ P 9 a. �. t�., .,.> ,,,: ', as ,. 2 2 _ �Za - __.. ,� � 13 . ',. _ 0.3 0. 0. 0.2 0:2 0.2 0.2 02 0:2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 1 9� L \ v f e, f L....... *0 Y ..,..Y f k„ k B k t a . Y Y Y Y k . f f + L 11.9 Ra.l Q:1 R� .. _ Cia, fill tb:1 A} (1.9 0.1 X._ t ...... as a:A U./ o,d U,1 a.:€ L i1., k1„z, a,a 0,1 i,.'i a`i�1'�i:;i :7 tt4 a,Yt'• l.a o 34 .a B Y Y. ,.. R f. k. Y Y R f f. k d B ,8 ....,®` Y ,.. ,' B k J �i,t IJ.O .i i.a l9, a.i t. !.1 p.l i 9. ..9 a_. ®_..,...._.. __ ,: ,i, f i i. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.Q , ) ar r.. �r, i 1a a a, a c l a 4a �1 �9 a, t1 ) Q, (l r1,1 91 11 5,.1 oa �; ag ,.59.3o t>;, l,,r 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1- 0.1 0:1 .1 0 1 0:1 0.1 0:1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 0 0 0 0, LL g "f �� ' a f Y L f0;, kQ.B b1,0" I.§b� "O ...._.. ,. t , • • • • • • • - .. .. • • • • • O ' YR?:1 ®U,.1 41.9 11,1 9:1 11:, 0,1 4 °is 32 g. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 £ �t.� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ _ Q.1 0.1 _ 0.1 0.1 0.0 .. . g T to 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o ._ J 4� • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • N o E b 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 u- m N o N -O -j p (nn c • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • z a�-a .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0 � a, i o n IN J > az • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 c r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • J 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.G 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 a 0 '0 m rn 0 0 � 0 0 1 Ott 1 0 140 160 180 00 0 40 � 0 80 300 3 34 3 0 400 4 440 4 4 0 52 4 0_ 0 0 30 0 0 CEO w � 0 Q 0 Scale: 1 inch= 20 Ft. v � � M c C O c N O > ^ 3 Q i N V � QC C���MI D ,3 z C) MAR 3 0 2026 Q m o SOUTHOLD TOWN N � Lu - a � N w PLANNING BOARD cry 'I E O 8 o u >- c .- -Q v Z OPTION I (preferre N h 00 cO 00 d- � PLOT TO 22"X34"PAGE Luminaire Schedule All quotes/orders generated from this layout must be forwarded to the Local Rep Agency Symbol Qty Tag Label Arrangement Lum. Lumens Arr. Lum. Lumens LLF Description Lum.Watts Arr.Watts Total Watts BUG Rating 4 A5 ALED5T26Y PCT Single 3395 3395 1.000 TYPE V AREA LIGHT 26.3789 26.379 105.516 B2-UO-G1 17 ! B SA-MUB Single 243 243 1.000 BOLLARD 8.25 8.25 140.25 BO-UO-GO 1 F1 FFLEDS @18W_3K Single 2515 2515 1.000 FLOODLIGHT 118.4485 18.449 18.448 N.A. �-❑ 2 F2 X17XFU35 @35W_3K Single 4644 4644 1.000 FLOODLIGHT 35.91 35.91 71.82 N.A. _ _ °m� o v _ v m" 14 L 16101 Single 43 43 1.000 61N HARDSCAPE LIGHT 0.8 0.8 11.2 BO-UO-GO v 4 WM SLED5Y Single 128 128 1.000 WALL MOUNT 5.3 5.3 21.2 B0-U1-GO q z Eo 2 WP SLIM12Y D10 Sing le 2006 2006 1.000 WALLPACK 15 15 30 B1-UO-GO _° L ° . E ® o m E� . s TOTAL LUMENS (excluding existing globe lights): 34,640 °°- D 42 °v a � a c v Y z ".v o n "v n t 21 - N c Calculation Summary o c p m a � Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Description PtSpcLr PtSpcTb Meter Type °a q E'E v .0 " o a E a v c E " H " - c E m o � o r Site Illuminance Fc 0.06 1.6 0.0 N.A. N.A. Readings taken at 0'-0" AFG 10 10 Horizontal °-.0v E v �- o 01 o p E a o ° c E o v o Walkway Illuminance Fc 0.75 6.7 0.0 N.A. N.A. Readings taken at 0'-0" AFG 5 5 Horizontal 0v v y � o � o m= o' E.� o A a$ o v rn o P o� Parking Lot Illuminance Fc 0.55 1.4 0.2 2.75 7.00 Readings taken at 0'-0" AFG - - o f v a v - m> > > v v g w a _°a c o E Expanded Luminaire Location Summary -o 0 o a 3 c az m L c a ".. a a c E 5 LumNo Tag X Y MTG HT Orient Tit � _ o 1 A5 458.744 88.585 11.5 90 0 q - 2 A5 407.246 98.992 11.5 90 0 v 3 A5 356.062 89.563 11.5 90 0 mt E 4 A5 305.324 104.223 11.5 90 0 V ,o,r 2 a o c o - 5 F 1 138.745 91.827 12.9 270 50 6 L 252.074 44.814 1.5 212.928 0 2 a o ¢ m 1 n `o w E `o 7 L 228.093 66.668 1.5 265.232 0 8 L 218.169 59.753 1.5 278.237 0 9 L 255.476 51.261 1.5 219.068 0 0 10 L 228.404 60.073 1.5 264.074 0 o N 11 L 246.715 41.252 1.5 213.875 0 N 12 ! L 241.108 48.042 1.5 225 0 o N N 13 L 233.275 52.7 1.5 244.699 0 14 L 220.927 53.681 1.5 283.762 0 N 15 L 212.339 50.683 1.5 294.318 0 °J `�� 16 L 239.262 56.863 1.5 244.061 0 Q � J J � 18 L 248.558 58.178 1.5 221.777 0 vLL 19 L 247.045 51.315 1.5 229.086 0 N " _ o N -� 20 L 237.663 64.249 1.5 255.636 0 N 0 tA 21 B 193.064 53.043 3.5 180 0 o 22 B 215.16 77.251 3.5 180 0 v m 23 B 58.417 70.178 3.5 270 0 ' 24 B 95.769 51.277 3.5 270 0 83.089 70.921 3.5 270 0 25 B N 26 B 70.782 59.209 3.5 270 0 M N 27 B 113.318 64.69 3.5 270 0 0 CD 28 B 205.675 65.766 3.5 180 0 29 B 258.784 34.218 3.5 120 0 30 B 271.515 42.813 3.5 0 0 31 B 284.351 43.437 3.5 0 0 LL 32 B 296.018 34.32 3.5 0 0 33 B 307.936 35.998 3.5 0 0 _ 0 Y) �� a��aw � � ,. L M 34 B 313.882 47.415 3.5 0 0 It 35 B 313.4 58.829 3.5 0 0 C) 41 �.E ,"ra ,.: D C 36 WM 184.692 66.505 3.83 270 0 sr � v cc 37 WM 169.239 67.073 3.83 270 0 , o cc 38 WM 153.705 67.563 3.83 270 0 c 39 WM 138.242 68.063 3.83 270 0 s' z 40 WP 167.619 90.977 7.5 270 0 .,,max, J > Fn 41 WP 190.901 90.476 14.16 270 0 42 F2 196.697 91.151 15.5 0 50 43 F2 278.955 94.415 15.5 180 50 44 B 301.557 68.828 3.5 0 0 45 B 284.083 70.093 3.5 0 0 0 Total Quantity:44 m C L 0 J m Q O C N M rn v o > U) 00 -�e 0 LL � ,v O v N C Z U Q E mCU MAR 3 0 2026 a 0cr,4) w SOUTHOLD I UVVN LL PLANNING BOARD Q O C] U � p1 z a - OPTION I referre -Co 00 00 � 00 00 PLOT TO 2211X34"PAGE 0 I m v 31 r v - c v a E E o a o o ED o o v u o,� o Lo,E o cE E u-Y �aD `.o E G O C m i a o o .N _ aO1i E E D D > C O C O O a n E E y-o` o f � E �+ o � o fO s .•. ' ° o a E v rn w T E o � r m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 E � a --O c° o c > o v a v« m E$ E o+ 3 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • E A o .q a v : a t x ;x 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = a s o o o' J m r N m W 2 C C O m D -2 0 = I 'S Fs � � a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 v a a v'3 = v q v a s ° ° z ¢ c > E o o E m a rn° °1 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 w c _ a a a a x n a ,� a v t E o E ° E a s A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0a u x s = y E ` c rn r m m A o E a o 3 N o as 160 Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0- 0.0 0.0 00 Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1` 0.1' 0.1 .0 0.0 ' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0- 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 0.0 ' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0:0 0,0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.1 -0.1 0,1 -- 0.1_ 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0` 0.0 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 140 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 r 0.2 0,2 0 2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0:0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0:u 0.1,' 0.1 0.i 0.. -.0 0. _A 0.0 0.0_ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t� Q i a : Ln U Co 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 , -` •Fly �;, 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3_ 0:6 0;,6 0.3 0.1 0.1 - 0.1 0.1 0,1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0:2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 110 N t` O rn *0. *0. *0. *0. *0. • *0. • • • • • • ! • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • p\i M Co 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0' ti.= •U.7 ,,��:� 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 ) r,•, _, .+�,; 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 1.2 1.8 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 10.0 `'Q 0 =r; 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 d , f, �3) .,1 t • 't1 t Pt:3 1'ss fl N 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ♦4.0 •21 °t,a: 0.6 0.5 0.7 1.3 .E A a 2.0 0.8 0.2 0.4 4.6 14.1 1.9 0.2 0.3 1.0 .7 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. lt•',.3Cu ..................___-_- - _ Ln L.L • • • • • • • _ • A • • • • • • cM ®.. # • 38 a -a fa C,) } 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a.:: 3,1 a,f r„) (_4 0, 0.9 a a1 rt st la.a _i :A. t.� „E. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +r -'--- _ _ F2 O� O __1 �3 (n F1 ! WP. F20.7 5.r 13s 722 °1.4 7.0 o✓ it: a�` , ; A ,0,n' oas„ = • • • • • • •, P _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o, ... -5.{) -43-..._130.. a.z 7.4 0.9 v.6,' 'r „r,. , .:,.o,o Q:0 Q#0 Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q .. (n ..... C I v ......Y:6 0,8 0.6 0.5 ob 40 0.6 AH .- " ,. t0.1 :.,<.:....... ,r ,.. C m SA 1$ C • • • • • • • • • • 4J N .. ♦ e a .,...e • . . a .. ,- .y s - j f� Y Cm t N 80 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0, 0!0 4 o.a _ v. , , o.� o.. os _ps o.4 c. . . _..... ._ _ _..:.. __ ., : `0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 at 19 .. .... �__--- (� a_ Ll � .p b f).1 0.2 1.3 9.. n.2 .,. ...._ _-__-.�.. _- � -�_...... ,. - ., $':...... 0. �'- 4 J.. ha:... 0,4 0.4 _._._.. 4. 4 ..., - _ .... 0.1 ,43.� ... p0 ..OA..... Ot .• 0.0 ,:00 "Y).0 • • • • • • • /o WfA : WM �. .. • • • • • • _.... ' 10, . s ♦ , . �4 . • •......:. ♦ , , • • •W M . WM . . ;.•`, S # .. a .. ♦ Lo {,. t1.. 3 1. p,A G. p r p i U. .i .4 p. (.7 ). a - 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q.Q,. ... _� . :4... ..d Q,a ,;4 •.,, d. :d Q.n P,. �(� 9 �_ (?t1 1 a ). 20 n.3 '- 0.6 ..R.6 .f15-�-- .3 (0 0,3 0.- 0.3 0,4...... a,3 0.? ,� 9 0.:3 O..S 05 0 00._...._.U.O : 0.0 : 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 M B O , ♦ s ./ 22 a • ♦ O a e • a ♦ • s`' a • • • # • • • :__ ♦ ?73 . . , • . , 'O 20 1 c0 0 4 J.1 0 d o,a p;3 p.0 0,p .0 a.a (7.4 a 7 .0 1. 4 .1 a ..- ... 7 s 4, a,l, a' <..p.1 0,. a ,l n U G 4 0 0, n,0 0. 0.. 0.3 52,0 J O 0.0 75, 0.2 T}3 a... 3F g B . m ,..®. . 60 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 0.0 o v,. as o o,a az o .:.,va, a.a n,z (1 0. , 0.1 a.1 0.. a �,a v.c \a.1 \ o.l v. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 „ �� S . I� i_ e 0.0 0.0 0.0 OJ 01^. on Ot7 ;,�,;f):7 O,i 0.1 O.l 0.1 r 0,1 U.7 Q,) � :2....`.Q;Y'. 0,3.. 0.1 0.7 O;l 0i 0,1...,__.0,2....... 0.5 U.7 O.Z 0,1 0.1 0.9 Cl.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0. 0.1 � 0 0.5 "'iN1 13�®30 O,27 0.8 r J � 72 g , • • • • • • • • • �, • • • • • • • • • • • • o t.P ( 5 ) P ;'.:. ) P. 1. 1 1 i 3. 1 - .. 0 7 1 P 29._..._ ty 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0;0 ( , �.1 4.1 n.! no o.c ra ,.v co a. 4, a, , f 1 0. v:1 0,1 v l a o \ v.t a.1 at o.t o,t o.1 0.1 0. p.7 s a2,, ,� p.8 t.,z p.. ., 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' 0.0 0:0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 B .),0` „9.9 O.tl a.a a.t o 1 (0 p. 0:1 ),r 7 _... _..,.) , �}.;......,y;[, t),tL... ,).(} 01 a ♦ t s a e .+ _ I`' \. 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.7 O.t 0.) 0.7 t}.t 0:0 R.1, S):1 - - 0.5 OJ 0.2, • • • • • • • • • • • • ! ` • O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 _ 0,1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 III 0,1 0,1 0,1 0.1 0,1 0.1 0.1 o,l.` 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 B fA .... 40 4, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ;.... 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 `�° o ,- • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • v O E 20 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o E >s v C • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Z C N .0 41 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � -C LA o V)) J > a) F5 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 s= 2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 m 0- 0 O o 0 v � Scale: 1 inch= 20 Ft. � M c C O c N 0 > Q 00 a) O v O 0 En LL -O N LA z U rY73 •= i O E Q Co to f0 c Co -0 a N Lu LL MAR 3 0 2026 g SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD z � QJ Z aJ a v CD OPTION 11 -tZ-� (D 00 00 C) 00 d CO PLOT TO 22"X34"PAGE Luminaire Schedule All quotes/orders generated from this layout must be forwarded to the Local Rep Agency Symbol Qty Tag I Label Arrangement Lum. Lumens Arr. Lum. Lumens LLF Description ILum.Watts Arr.Watts Total Watts BUG Rating 4 A ALEDXS @24W_3K Single 2962 2962 1.000 AREA LIGHT :23 23 92 131-UO-G1 U 14 B SA-MUB Single 243 243 1.000 BOLLARD 18.25 8.25 115.5 BO-UO-GO - 41 1 F1 FFLEDS @18W_3K Single 2515 2515 1.000 FLOODLIGHT 18.4485 18.449 18.448 N.A. _ t ° ° V v 30o v � E � J vw 2 F2 X17XFU35 @35W_3K Single 4644 4644 1.000 FLOODLIGHT .35.91 35.91 71.82 N.A. 9 S FSLEDH3Y 120 Single 37 37 1.000 STEP LIGHT 1 '3.04 3.04 27.36 BO-U1-GO v vN � A �� v - v� say 4 WM SLED5Y Single 128 128 1.000 WALL MOUNT .5.3 5.3 21.2 BO-U1-GO 1E ov - 2 WP SLIM12Y D10 Single 2006 2006 1.000 WALLPACK 15 15 30 131-UO-GO _ °` E .... -- rn'E c E - rn 0 0 E rn-o vL a -o o t TOTAL LUMENS (excluding existing globe lights): 31,910 n - v E °' > z a o ° N v v c Calculation Summary �a a v �,' o E N N. Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Description PtSpcLr PtSpcTb Meter Type a a E v a a v = E AL o,o� o a� as w .. -a m Site Illuminance Fc 0.05 14.1 0.0 N.A. N.A. Readings taken at 0'-0" AFG 10 10 Horizontal o.q a 8 o N a B o r o E m Walkway Illuminance Fc 0.85 15.8 0.0 N.A. N.A. Readings taken at 0'-0" AFG 5 5 Horizontal o, E .� a o m o v Parking Lot Illuminance Fc 0.34 2.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. Readings taken at 0'-0" AFG _ > = v _ = o E °y Y v � � - o E f j 3 E t o �- v q�w wz o .. E a_ 2` N - z v o �° Expanded Luminaire Locatiom Summary E vv8z a �.$ o q m o Y o m s LumNo Tag X Y MTG HT Orient Tilt of � � N d g V L Z. a C aV. E S o E a o� .c 1 A 356.062 89.763 10 90 0 E as QE E 2 A 305.324 104.423 10 90 0 T a a ; r J � N h> � a 3 A 407.246 99.192 10 90 0 _ Q rn t 3 3 0 2 c 2.0c0 4 A 458.744 88.785 10 90 0 mo � a a c c o a c 5 - 5 F 1 138.745 91.827 12.9 270 50 _ Z o+ a, o o a v � 6 S 215.586 52.003 1.5 294.318 0 �� � � agNv a = .o o'rn E-o 7 S 233.172 52.732 1.5 246.044 0 8 S 246.679 41.328 1.5 208.945 0 9 S 252.074 44.814 1.5 212.928 0 10 S 228.093 66.668 1.5 265.232 0 a lJ Q 11 S 244.834 60.789 1.5 239.647 0 M co 12 S 237.96 57.454 ; 1.5 246.048 0 ^, 13 j S 218.169 59.753 1.5 278.237 0 o 0 0 0 rn co 14 S 255.476 51.261 1.5 219.068 0 't r 15 B 312.891 58.629 3.5 0 0 a, 16 B 285.59 70.201 3.5 0 0 L J N 17 B 193.064 53.043 3.5 180 0 18 B 215.16 77.251 3.5 180 0 19 B 58.417 70.178 3.5 270 0 N C 0 10 4.1 20 B 95.769 58.791 3.5 270 0 x; v rn 0 21 B 83.089 70.921 3.5 270 0 v m 22 B 70.782 59.209 3.5 270 0 v C 3 24 B 113.318 64.69 3.5 270 0 N a LL o 26 B 298.087 33.754 3.5 0 0 27 j B 305.589 47.381 3.5 0 0 N 28 B 298.119 62.952 3.5 0 0 co 29 B 272.745 43.225 3.5 120 0 30 B 288.967 47.992 3.5 0 0 31 WM 184.692 66.505 3.83 270 0 32 WM 169.239 67.073 3.83 270 0 a 33 WM 153.705 67.563 3.83 270 0 34 WM 138.242 68.063 3.83 270 0 Y , in 35 WP 167.619 90.977 7.5 270 0 36 WP 190.901 90.476 14.16 270 0 37 F2 196.697 91.151 15.5 0 50 v 0 E 38 F2 278.955 94.415 15.5 180 50 LL JU U) Total Quantity: 36CM z C � . -C V o 0 V) > rn a 0 a c rn J X O a. O 0) C t .0) J m Q O C O I� > N (0 � M c C o 0 � , O > n a 000 0L L Y W (n 0 v •� o Z) -0N V, z v M 00 MAR 3 0 2026 `' a o N w LL SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD 2: o O o u >- c v Z OPTION 11 V1 0 � o - N � ry 0o co coo 00 SALTY ROOTS GARDEN&LANDSCAPE DESIGN 101 iu 1 luvv Ur lul-Inerly oT L24b mcr Ilc 0 PO BOX 894 Mattituck, NY 11952 z N27040'50"W saltyrootsny.com s E � —' 500.67 M cc 631 .315.9091 n � w m m o �\ m o ❑ m ` � � Project walk ° �� / \ x Southold Free Library c walk walk wall/planter = ° _ �' `� �' a J E 53705 & 53745 Main Rd. _ m =a / - mason wall/ lanter __� a c mason _ — _ @ > CU CL Southold, C e s • O_ l { ...a - .. conc. L � d Y, r Y y �..N � � � a _� stone cur c li stone curb ,%••' �' � � t, ,= Q cn timber wall —v— �_ - - ---=— _:�_---- z _--- — . ---_ -- — — onc. 1.1'W o, (0 f - x --o-- onc. 9 n Igns s signs �— �—signs �- ��— - T - - _ --` _ - -- - chain link fence on concrete curb -- - - ------ — - - - -sl - \ � < stone curb T 3 — — mason wall stone curb fl �. i o t z w 50.1' v 27.7' �cL 8.3' c,V- _ 1) c 1 a a) ✓- ,: .. stone curb / �° 1 M o = PLAN Zn ao > 0 8.7 i o n r ,{ \ E a - _. _ a NORTH rn t @ rn 20.1' 6 8 `o t ;{ l.�•- L` ; Q cuo �p✓rf = N t E a \ r9I I 3 p : w M > i ICU / a co i4, 3 oM (D 3�r a � - one curb t Z' £•. .{ e �° NORTH, V U Z _ c stone curb.� c is C 0 < m �= m O Z N e" y{ Surveyor: car r' `X - _•_,.. m 1 c t p! (n �5 9.3' ci 5.7' 28.5' t - - " �- f _ JM Land Surveying cn c c'; 3 El IC1 � > > if _ CC _ / o r -D-d-_a > 01 i m o ----'�_ r~ O 18.2t' o m \ fd $ Smithtown,htOWn Box 408 co' - t m m O C� c° U N _a ✓ r`\�- c°' L�. a0 3 `- �/j a o 631.724.4832 = _J � n 14.2' o 4,8' ITt t cn o 27.8' (� 35.0' `�- ih m V W / w o o a Y D n w � w w co 0 0 �.Et N Z a I w .� m m .� 0_ u vi 12,1' of wall eps• 0 3 n> o L . �, Site Data: m c ° roof line a � Y a� C O 0 o Y _ _- J x SCTW 1000-61-01-15.2 & 15.5 w „• U ... -^ V - - - - o fl.- _ _ . ..o vhaln link ce Yt :� ______ _ - Lot Area: 5B 894 SOFT 1.28 acres -• _ _ , ...�o., o o �"'o k CV . � 2 { 1 t w O ry 0 0 __....._...._,.,_....._._..__._.._ ,. x c cre wall T .r ed x ry x __. x x �. x re -w, , g of gravel ,x.._ •a x t w , 1 t _. x , CD W cc I' _ -' M - •^M a W cu curb x - x .r W Q o ,a i �e 1 70 4 7'0 9"E (� I M J *:/'�- 22 LIB f •I � o 06 v p Q u c i; W Cl) C) 1 It160 .. � t 0 '- o a .-.... ..- --- •_.-__- -- ^_•--..,.-_T „ „_, ..., -. ._. -_ - 1 'gin I 0 153. 00 S27 54 00 E , � 44 2 / FF S O _ y _._.,..__ .__._._.. w .__. T. 1 , '. UILDING W 2 O c, O (i6 �. i 0 m in 0 - n an She ___ < sCD — land � - _ _ _ _ now o r form I µ ^" `. _ .�- n - erl of fhv Ilc - , T: r CD - .r " land no __ _ . ___ ____ . _j � . ^ N formerly o nor or hidings llc N U C CD Q O N edge of pavement a � edge of pavement u) 169 .65' J � � S31 ° 15'I00"E o CD N � C a � -� - o D C o Q land now or formerly of dobi inc. QC7) CD � � � C � C n O C Q O n O LE -O O O N C C = O O m CL O +N-• O .— -O C QJ C�3�CNMOW _D � o MAR 3 0 2026 L LE SOUTHOLD TOWN O N M PLANNVNG BOARD Z KEY, PERMIT SET Existing Trees Title: Existing Site Conditions A,q�, Scale: ,5 QiiAAN ? 1 /16" _ 1 loll * Drafted by: ,l+ Eric Martz L1 '�,�.©�N�-t� Date:03.16.26 Sheet 1 of 6 SALTY ROOTS GARDEN&LANDSCAPE DESIGN PO BOX 894 Mattituck, NY 11952 4tyrootsny.com 631 .315.9091 El Project :Southold Free Library 53705 & 53745 Main Rd. F= Southold, NY 5 f L -- ---- rF 0 ........ {0 i ! ---- -———————-- PLAN 0 NORTH -9- ED10 EDI RUE _71 EDI N ORTH ar age Bins 0 Surveyor: • JM Land Surveying PO Box 1408 F1 EJ El F� I 1U Smithtown,NY 631.724.4832 _Y v -a— _T R E D I Site Data: EDI r K11W 1000-61-01-15.2 & 15.5 'X Zoning: FIB Lot Area: 55,894 SOFT(1.28 acres) 0 0 DI L ............ T 7 7 J 0 25 . ..... 0 + P +LP O 7D c) _O C) E 71S_771 17-11,P,W M ID p C) CD- 2 C7) MAR 3 0 2026 CD- SOUTHOLD TOWN PLA'NVAG E30ARD C, 7D �E 7D (D _.CD _CD E -2 _TD KEY rn REDI - Relocated Existing Drainage Inlet EDI - Existing Drainage Inlet • DI - Drainage Inlet N Land bol D gag ion : + LP - Leaching Pool vv/ Drainage Inlet + HP - High Point DA"Rh K I N Bollard Light Old F iif-if PERM IT SET t h brd Post Light Existinq This project proposes combining two adjacent lots into a single lot and creating a new pocket park on the 6 Spots Wall Light site of the existing parking area at the Southold Free Library. The existing parking will be relocated to the Removing Masonry Light upper library entrance. 2 Spots D Existing Spot/Door Light Title: Improvements include the construction of an ADA-compliant pathway, new stairs, a new retaining wall, a Adding i��. Existing Post Light Site Development Plan stacked stone amphitheater, seating areas, planting and lawn areas, and an activity area with a shade sail. 11 Spots o Electric Outlet Site amenities will include lighting throughout the park, a hose bib, electrical outlets, irrigation and the Hose Bib OLED A/?, Scale: installation of a new storage shed. Total -cvkAN The project will involve tree removal and site grading, including the relocation of approximately 4,900 cubic 15 Spots Existing Trees 1 /1611 1 loll feet of existing soil and the import of approximaltely 31,380 cubic feet of clean fill/topsoil to achieve final r�l LGarba,,e rEqD, , grades and support the proposed improvements. Drainage inlets and dry wells will be installed to capture --0— 4' Privacy Fence rafted by: water runoff. 794 Eric Martz L1 Wood Post and Rope Gat30 Date:03,16.26 Sheet 2 of 6 %A.A.- .A.A.. SALTY ROOTS GARDEN&LANDSCAPE DESIGN PO BOX 894 Mattituck, NY 11952 saltyrootsny-corn 631 .315.9091 Project :Southold Free Library 53105 & 53745 Main Rd. Southold, NY 0 A 14, Q PLAN *,ho A _A.o \ G \ G .�,s '/\'- ,r $ EDI NORTH RUE T A EDI EDI �tv, N"',R H Garbag e Bins V1. U V ii; "W 0 Surveyor: 0 '4 JIVI Land Surveying PO Box 1408 El El Smithtown, NY E-:J 631.724.4832 X, V ............ 00 > REDI EDI Site Data: EDI 1JURL L L r I , 1-1, 1, 1 P� " i SCTM# 1000-61-01-15.2 & 15.5 J _J Zoning- HB 0 ' '0_0_0 lot Area: 55,894 SQFT(1.28 acres) Di 0�0 P 417_ 01- C: SHADE SAIL "a +HIP \J I J U ................ t 0 i. -4 LU U) 0 _?5 0 P P CD C) 773 r�_ . cD (_3 LJ_J c) c) o c C> C-) c) C-) c- C) 7_3 C) W C) .C) E D C_: MAR 3 0 2026 CD _CD 7D SOUTHOLD TOM L'�J�(�i6IA6 4- OA La d rr U le c ■ M ■ KEY V% AF Bo h I 1 1 MeALibram Uff PE PR'1UW HT SET ..UJ.9..d. PL ANT KEY REDI - Relocated Existing Drainage Inlet This project proposes combining two adjacent lots into a single lot and creating a new pocket park on the EDI - Existing Drainage Inlet site of the existing parking area at the Southold Free Library. The existing parking will be relocated to the - DI - Drainage Inlet upper library entrance. Deciduous Tree 0 Perennial & Grass Mix + LP - Leaching Pool w/ Drainage Inlet Title: Improvements include the construction of an ADA-compliant pathway, new stairs, a new retaining wall, a + HP - High Point Landscape Plan stacked stone amphitheater, seating areas, planting and lawn areas, and an activity area with a shade sail. Site amenities will include lighting throughout �the park, a hose bib, electrical outlets, irrigation and the Shrub Existing Trees vLED Scale: installation of a new storage shed. -c"AN 1 /1611 1 loll The project will involve tree removal and site grading, including the relocation of approximately 4,900 cubic Evergreen Tree Meadow MIx De I Y- Z- feet of existing soil and the import of approximately 31,380 cubic feet of clean fill/topsoil to achieve final -Drafted by: grades and support the proposed improvements. Drainage inlets and dry wells will be installed to capture *Icons represent the overall intention, not wpecific locations. Plantings will be Eric Martz L1 water runoff. focused on Northeast Native, deer resistant and drought tolerant 307 4, Date:03,16.26 Sheet 3 of 6 SALTY ROOTS GARDEN&LANDSCAPE DESIGN PO BOX 894 Mattituck, NY 11952 saltyrootsny.com 631 .315.9091 El Project :Southold Free Library 53705 & 53745 Main Rd. Southold, NY • ti '34- PLAN NORTH EDI• EDI TRUP EDI C, NORTH Garbage Bins 0 0 0 7\ Surveyor: 1 0 0 \---.-3 JM Land Surveying PO Box 1408 F� El r El LI Smithtown, NY 631.724.4832 I. 3 REDI EDI EDI V, Site Data: -61-01-15.2 15.5 SCTM# 1000 4 Zoning: HB 0 Lot i. Area: �5,894 SOFT(1.28 acres) % 4� A X 4 N. _33 Ul I v Z; YY D SHADE SAtL ........ 71 j V Y) C 0 v V +L V .......... 0 0-- 'A ,6 (D 0) Q� 4- V 0 CD CD c) (_5 LJ_J __j ri- �P C5 CD U C_ _C_ Draina e 100 r 2"thr C-) _�2 -C) P 'CD M a) - CD- r-) _L0 I\IcDonald C-cosenices CP CD C�_ 5; NY 11971 (331.765.30 7 'E fi��t Hole Data Sheet 1,141SQFT (PAVED) 183CUFT 1,457SQFT (LAWN) 86CUFT C) F] 1:1 _CD �_) LE Name. Southold Library Parking CD DW 1 228CUFT 8'x6' M C-) DIP: 755SQFT (PLANTED) 45CUFT 721 SQFT (LAWN) 43CU FT CD F1 F� Location: Southold C-) 1,181SQFT (PLANTED) 70CUFT Tax Map Number: 1000-61-1-15.2 -2 PRECAST CONCRETE DOME (D Project Description: Eng 3: 1,5 SDR 35 PVC INLET PIPE 1,282SQFT (PAVED) 206CUFT Date: 3110/26 MAR 3 0 2026 C) 1,570SQFT (PLANTED) 93CUFT DW 3 El 688CUFT 10'x12' M F] SOLITHOLDIOWN GRADE 4— PLANNING BOARD C> TOP OF DRYWELL F-1 2,269SQFT (GRASS) 134CUFT 1,362SQFT (BLUESTONE FINES) 196CUFT Mixcld sand,town,gravat dehns MAX (SEE PLAN FOR ELEVATION) DW2 569C U FT 1 0'x1 0' -------- SDR 35 PVC OVERFLOW PIPE BACKFILL T-0"MINIMUM AROUND 1,659SQFT (PAVED) 266CUFT 1,055SQFT (PLANTED) 63CUFT DRYWELL WITH 1 Y4"-1 Y2"MEDIUM 1-1 E] 0 = = COARSE SAND/GRAVEL F-1 1,286SQFT (PLANTED) 76CUFTO 144SQFT (STEPS) 24CUFT I.VM brown fine wind SP 0 E-_1 E14 PRECAST CONCRETE STORM ______. s' SEE PLAN FOR DEPTH DRAIN RING I 1NOTES: PERMI T SET 4'-0"MINIMUM PENETRATION INTO RATEABLE SOIL. REDI - Relocated Existing Drainage Inlet Ljgl�t brown fine to coame sand SW 25-0"MAXIMUM DEPTH BELOW GRADE EDI - Existing Drainage Inlet 583SQFT (PLANTED) 35CUFT Z-01. 2'-0"MINIMUM ABOVE GROUND WATER DI - Drainage Inlet GROUND WATER LINE MIN 2'-0"MAXIMUM ACCESSCHIMNEY(IF NECESSARY) Title: 2,516SQFT (MIXED/LAWN) 149CUFT NON-RATEABLE SOIL + LIP - Leaching Pool wl Drainage Inlet 6-4 DRYWELL TO BE INSTALLED AS PER STATE AND + HP - High Point Grading & Drainage Plan DW 4 1,617SQFT (PAVED) 260CUFT 554CUFT 8'x14' 1 17" MIN' SAND AND GRAVEL-RATEABLE SOIL LOCAL CODES 1111 11ii;INF-0 A/?o Scale: CLEAN MEDIUM COARSE FILL Existing Trees v"A A N El765SQFT (BLUESTONE FINES) 110CUFT Comments, No waiter encountpred PRWASTCONCRME11HMEM 1 /1611 1 loll LL_ DO 0)"'1 4 Test hole boring.... Detail NTS Drafted by: 307 A 44 Eric Martz C1 4$!OF Date:03.16.26 Sheet 4 of 6 eft 0-4 SALTY ROOTS GARDEN&LANDSCAPE DESIGN PO BOX 894 Mattituck, NY 11952 saltyrootsny.com 631 .315.9091 Project : Southold Free Library 53703 & 53145 Main Rd. Southold, NY PLAN NORTH TROD NORTH .. '. ry Surveyor: JM Land Surveying PO Box 1408 Smithtown, NY i 631.724.4832 i' i i Site Data: �. SCTM# 1000-61-01-15.2 & 15.5 Zoning: HB Lot Area: 55,894 SOFT(1.28 acres) 63 i 0 00 y i f ... .. .. .... ....... . ,... ..,, r, e . a�u.�.;;><wn wem� ao.�w. -. mra:� wxuvv, � •, U .... w�ruw: wma� w�mx ».e:.rer,: sv.«,,�,�..aems�w.nmR"»mwma ............ ... ,. .:•. j �o O CD Q � w 2 z w ci 00 Q c a � � � � c N O cB C Q O O � � O QJ �.— O � N —Q cn C C O O � O O .u, VAAN MAR 3 0 2026 � �a� ` Q N � SOUTHOLD TOWN m r �E PLANNING BOARD O c� M 30794 N Elevation Cut (Cubic Feet) Fill (Cubic Feet) 36 423.40 35 442.69 820.22 PERMIT SET 34 500.74 79.77 33 771.99 191.91 32 452.23 780.05 31 276.41 1,203.85 30 52.66 2,180.40 Title: 29 30.39 3,914.52 Cut/Fill 28 202.95 4,970.68 27 462.07 7,185.04 Scale: 26 584.65 9,327.61 1 /16 II — 1 I 0 II 25 908.95 302.96 24 214.48 Drafted by: Eric Martz C1 Date.03.16.26 TOTAL: 4,900.21 31,380.41 Sheet 5 of 6 I SALTY ROOTS GARDEN&LANDSCAPE DESIGN PO BOX 894 Mattituck, NY 11952 4tyrootsny.com 631 .315.9091 Project � W Southold Free ary ,E 53705 & 53745 Main Rd. Southold, NY _ i PLAN NORTH - �-- EDI TPNP EDI _._ ___ .. Garbage ins NORTH I t� 11 ° Surveyor: 0 JM Landing PO Box v 1y408 ..._._. (I _....._.. _ Smithtown, NY n 631 724 4832 E , ` I Site Data: � E EDI SCTM# 1000-61-01-15.2 & 15.5 : _ t A 5 94 SO ( 28 ) o Area acre LA o n m g t , ( M h 1 t ,. •_,'tea. , LP , i l\.... LP 4. _ 011 io Nr , +LI _. N O Z N O cG � U C Q � O QJ � C6 7 z v o w o O O CD � z C z a o � _ o _ C QJ O � C SGUTt'1�LU iJseJ C o �- o � pl ANNING BOARD 7D o ro � C o 0 0 EK E Y cCDD a � � o Q � � cn cn c6 N m REDI - Relocated Existing Drainage Inlet o z EDI - Existing Drainage Inlet • DI - Drainage Inlet ■ i o— ■3 + LP - Leaching Pool w/ Drainage Inlet nd 45 _e P ro I it: 1c;Mt ■ + HP - High Point U F 1 r Bollard Light PERMIT SET Post Light This project proposes combining two adjacent Ilots into a single lot and creating a new pocket park on the Wall Light site of the existing parking area at the Southold Free Library. The existing parking will be relocated to the Masonry Light upper library entrance. Existing Spot/Door Light Title: Improvements include the construction of an ADA-compliant liant pathway, new stairs a new retaining wall, a -a Existing Post Light p p p Y> g Lighting Plan stacked stone amphitheater, seating areas, planting and lawn areas, and an activity area with a shade sail. a Electric Outlet ckSD Aq Site amenities will include lighting throughout the park, a hose bib, electrical outlets, irrigation and the Hose Bib ��.��P�xANC Scale: installation of a new storage shed. 1 /16 E1 = 1 loll The project will involve tree removal and site grading, including the relocation of approximately 4,900 cubic Existing Trees � feet of existing soil and the import of approximately 31 ,380 cubic feet of clean fill/topsoil to achieve final grades and support the proposed improvements. Drainage inlets and dry wells will be installed to capture El-- 4' Privacy Fence ' ° s 4 rafted by: water runoff. , ��� .t, Eric Martz L1 ® Wood Post and Rope Gate C>F N' Date:03.16.26 i Sheet 6 o 6 ALED5T26Y/PCT RAB Project Type: Prepared By: Date: i I Driver Info LED Info Type Constant Current Watts 26W 120V 0.22A Color Temp 3000K(Warm) 208V 0.13A Color Accuracy 70 CRI High output LED pole top area light with IES type V circular distribution.Wide and uniform 240V 0.11A L70 Lifespan 100,000 Hours 360 degree pattern ideal for large outdoor areas such as parking lots,corporate parks,and 277V 0.1 OA Lumens 3,395 Im retail settings. Input Watts 26.4W Efficacy 128.61m/W Color:Bronze Weight:21.81bs Technical Specifications Compliance Color Uniformity: Support Arms: UL Listed: RAB's range of Correlated Color Temperature follows Extruded aluminum Suitable for wet locations the guidelines of the American National Standard for Specifications forthe Chromaticity of Solid State Lens: IESNA LM-79&LM-80 Testing: Lighting(SSL)Products,ANSI C78.377-2017. Clear tempered glass lens RAB LED luminaires and LED components have been tested by an independent laboratory in accordance Performance Reflector. with IESNA LM-79 and LM-80. Lifespan: Specular vacuum-metallized polycarbonate,Type V 100,000-Hour LED lifespan based on IESIm-80 results distribution DLC Listed: andTM-21 calculations This product is on the Design Lights Consortium Gaskets: (DLC)Qualified Products List and is eligible for Wattage Equivalency: High-temperature silicone rebates from DLC Member Utilities. Equivalent to 100W Metal Halide DLC Product Code:PQRGZYS5 Finish: Construction Formulated for high durability and long-lasting color LED Characteristics Cold Weather Stating: LEDs: The minimum starting temperature is-40°F(-40°C) Green Technology: High-output,long-life LEDs Mercury and UV free.RoHS-compliant components. Maximum Ambient Temperature: Optical Color Consistency: Suitable for use in up to 104°F(40°C) 7-step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve BUG Rating: consistent fixture-to-fixture color Effective Projected Area: B2 UO G1 EPA=1.2 Color Stablllty. Other LED color temperature is warrantied to Shift no more Thermal Management Patents: than 200K in color temperature over a 5-year period Superior thermal management with external air-flow The designs of the ALED5T52 are protected by rrII\ fins patents pending in US,Canada,China,Taiwan and MUMLJ u Housing: Mexico MAR3 0 2026 Precision die-cast aluminum,Type V distribution SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport@rablighting.com Website:rabllghting com Copyright©2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Pagel of 3 ALED5T26Y/PCT RAB Technical Specifications(continued) 5-Year,No-Compromise Warranty: RAB warrants that our LED products will be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of five(5)years from the date of delivery to the end user,including coverage of light output,color stability,driver performance and fixture finish.RAB's warranty is subject to all terms and conditions found at rablighting.com/warranty Electrical Drivers: Constant Current,Class 2 with 6kV surge protection, 120-277VAC,50/60 Hz,120V:0.22A,208V:0.13A, 240V:0.11 A,277V:0.10A THD: 5.67%at 120V,6.72%at 277V Power Factor. 99.6%at 120V,96.4%at 277V Photocell: 120-277VTwistlockphotocell included.Photocell is compatible with 120V-277V. Dimensions Features 16" IES type V(circular)distribution -406 mrn T 100,000-hour LED lifespan 41/8" Compatible with standard 2 3/8"and 3"tenons 105 mm "Air-Flow"fins for maximum heat dissipation 5-Year,No-Compromise Warranty 12 3/8" 221/2" 314 mm 572 mm 6" 152 mm 1 i--Fits--I 2 3/8"and 3"Tenons Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport@rabllghting.com Website:rabllghting.com Copyright o 2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 3 ALED5T26Y/PCT RAB Ordering Matrb( Family Distribution Wattage Color Temp Finish Driver Option Options Other Options ALED 5T 26 Y /PCT ST=TypeV 26=26W Blank=5000KCoot Blank=Bronze Blank=120-277V Blank=No Option Blank=Standard 52=52W N=4000K Neutral W=White /480/1)10=480V w/Dimmable /LC=Lightcloud USA=BAA Compliant 78=78W Y=3000KWarm K=Black /480=480V /PCT=120-277VTwistlock RG=Gray /BL=Bi-Level Photocell /D10=Dimmable /PCT4=480VTwistlock Photocell Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport@rabllghting.com Website:rabllghting com Copyright O 2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 3 of 3 PR4-11-10Wf FLAB Project: Type: Date: Color:Bronze Weight:67.5 Ibs Technical Specifications Compliance Wall Thicimess: Other CSA Listed: 1/8" Terms of Sale: Suitable for wet locations Pole Terms of Sale is available online . Shaft Size: Performance 4" Desalption: Steel pole 4"round 11 gauge 10 foot welded tenon Anchor Bolt Templates: square base WARNING Template must be printed on 11"x 17" sheet for actual size.CHECK SCALE BEFORE USING. Construction Templates shipped with anchor bolts and available Vie• Shaft: 46,000 p.s.i.minimum yield. Max EPA's/Max Weights: 701VIPH 19.1 ft/700lb. Hand Holes: 801VIPH 14.4 ft/620 lb. Reinforced with grounding lug and removable cover 901APH 11.1 ft/585 lb. 1001VIPH 8.7 fb445 lb. Base Plates: 11 OMPH 7.0 ft/370 lb. Slotted base plates 36,000 p.s.i. 120MPH 5.7 ft/3351b. 130MPH 4.6 ft/300 lb. Color 140MPH 3.8 ft/265 lb. Bronze powder coating 150MPH 3.1 ft/180 lb Tenon: Accessories: Welded 2 3/8"tenon included Base/Cap:BASE-R4 Anchor Bolts:BOLT4/11 Height: loft Gauge: 11 Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport®rabllghting.com Website:rabllghting com Copyright o 2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 1 of 2 PR4-11-10WT FLAB Dimensions Features Designed for ground mounting Heavy duty TGIC polyester coating Reinforced hand holes with grounding lug and removable coverfor easy wiring access Pole caps,base covers&bolts are sold separately Custom manufactured for each application w �.r ` ftl/r \`lrypr= r Ordering Matrbt Family Shape Size Gauge Height Drilled/WeldedTenon P R 4 11 10 ! WT R=Round 4=4" 7=7 10=10' D2=Drilled TR=Tapered Round 5=5" 11=11 15=15' Wr=Welded Tenon 6=6" 20=20' 7=7" 25=25' 8=8" 30=30' Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupportarabllghting com Website:rabllghting.com Copyright o 2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 2 SA-MUB RAB Project: Type: Prepared By: Date: Driver Info LED Info Type Constant Current Watts 8W 120V 0.07A Color Temp 3000K 208V 0.04A Color Accuracy 83 CRI Color:Bronze Weight:4.6 lbs 240V 0.04A L70 Lifespan 100,000 Hours 277V 0.04A Lumens 2431m Input Watts 8.3W Efficacy 29.5 Technical Specifications Compliance Electrical Gaskets: UL Listed: Driver. High-temperature silicone Suitable for wet locations Constant Current,Class 2,120-277V,50/60 H7,120V. 0.07A,208V.0.04A,240V:0.04A,277V:0.04A Finish: IP Rating: Formulated for high durability and long-lasting color Ingress protection rating of IP65 for dust and water THD: 8.4%at 120V,21.8%at 277V Green Technology. IESNA LM-79&LM-80 Testing: Mercury and UV free.RoHS-compliant components. RAB LED luminaires and LED components have been Power Factor tested by an independent laboratory in accordance 99%at 120V,21.8%at 277V Installation with IESNA LM-79 and LM-80. Mounting: Dim to OfF 3pcs anchor bolts for mounting Trade Agreements Act Compliant: No This product is a product of Cambodia and a Optical "designated country"end product that complies Aux Power Supply: BUG Rating: with the Trade Agreements Act No BO UO GO LED Characteristics Construction Other LEDs: Cold Weather Starting: 5-Year Limited Warranty: Long-life,high-efficacy,discrete,surface-mount The minimum starting temperature is-40°F(-40°C) The RAB 5-year,limited warranty covers light output, LEDs driver performance and paint finish.RAB's warranty Maximum AmblentTemperature: is subject to all terms and conditions found at Color Consistency. Suitable for use in up to 113°F(45°C) rabliohtinq.com/wALr4j2L 7-step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve consistent fixture-to-fixture color Housing: Die-cast aluminum Color Uniformity: RAB's range of Correlated Color Temperature follows Lens: the guidelines ofthe American National Standard for Glass (SSL)Products,ANSI C78.377-2017. Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupportilillirablighting corn Website:rablighting com Copyright©2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Pagel of 2 SA-MUB RAB Dimensions Features IP65 rated I00,000-Hour LED Iifespan 5-Year Limited Warranty 0 I� Ordering Matrix Family Shape Type Color Temp Finish Voltage Options SA MU B=Bollard Blank=3000K Blank=Matte Bronze Blank=120-277V Blank=No Option WP=Wall5conce Blank=2200-4000K Tunable White' /RGB=16+million colors 'Applies to RGB models only Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport@rablighting com Website:rabllghting com Copyright m 2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 2 SLEM RAB Project Type: Prepared By: Date: Driver Info LED Info Type Constant Current Watts 5W 120V 0.1A Color Temp 3000K(Warm) 208V 0.06A Color Accuracy 87 CRI Square LED Step Lights.Equivalent to 13 Watt CFL or 40 Watt incandescent.Applications 240V 0.05A L70 Lifespan 100,000 Hours for steps,decks,landscape and entries.Meets ADA requirements.5-year,no-compromise 277V 0.049A Lumens 128 Im warranty. Input Watts 5.3W Efficacy 24.21m/W Color:Bronze Weight:1.5 Ibs Technical Specifications Compliance Voltage. LED Characteristics UL Listed: 120-277V Color Consistency: Suitable for wet locations.Suitable for mounting 3-step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve within 4 ft.of the ground. Surge Protection: consistent fixture-to-fixture color 1000 Volts IESNA LM-79&LM-80 Testing: Lumen Maintenance: RAB LED luminaires and LED components have been Construction The LED will deliver 70%of its initial lumens at tested by an independent laboratory in accordance Finish: 100,000 hours of operation with IESNA LM-79 and LM-80. Formulated for high durability and long-lasting color Color Temperature: Dark Sky Conformance: Cold Weather Starting: 3000K Allows for conformance to the IDA's fully shielding The minimum starting temperature is-40°F(-40°C) requirement,emitting no light above 90 degrees. Other Maximum AmblentTemperature: Patents: Trade Agreements Act Compliant: Suitable for use in up to 104°F(40°C) The design of the SLED Lights are protected by U.S. This product is a product of Cambodia and a Pat.612,975,Canada Pat.133101,and China Pat. "designated country"end product that complies Green Technology. ZL201030129140.1. with the Trade Agreements Act Mercury and UV free.RoHS-compliant components. 5-Year,No-Compromise Warranty: Performance Housing: RAB warrants that our LED products will be free from Llfespan: Precision die-cast aluminum housing and mounting defects in materials and workmanship for a period of 100,000-Hour LED lifespan based on IESIm-80 results plate(junction box not included) five(5)years from the date of delivery to the end and TM-21 calculations user,including coverage of light output,color Gaskets: stability,driver performance and fixture finish.RAB's Wattage Equivalency: High-temperature silicone warranty is subject to all terms and conditions found Equivalent to 13W CFL or 60W Incandescent at rablighting.com/warranty. Electrical Driver. 4W high output long life LED.Driver Constant Current,Class 2,50-60 Hz,100-240 VAC 0.18 amps. Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport@rablighting.com Website:rablighting com Copyright©2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 1 of 2 SLEM RA Dimensions Features so 5 Watt,High output LED f 12.7 crF1 I00,000-hour life Superior heat sinking with die cast aluminum housing Meets ADA Requirements Junction Box Not Included S" -- 12.7 cm 76cm1►I Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupportorablighting.com Website:rabllghting corn Copyright m 2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 2 N 0 •The adjustable fixture can pivot 180'for direct to surface install and pivot 270°when installed with mounting bracket.Usable range is installation dependent. Fixture 16100 16101 16102 16103 -_ •Offering a custom optical lens that diffuses light to deliver smooth,uniform output while Fixture Length 3.5" 6" 12" 18" eliminating hotspots and glare that may reflect off walls or installation surfaces. Lumen Output 10 40 85 125 •Can be installed either as a traditional downlight or as an uplight,on or off mounting bracket. Input Voltage 9-15 9-15 9-15 9-15 •Housing cavity and electronics are encapsulated to help keep all critical components Power(W)@ 12VAC 0.3 0.9 protected against the elements. Power(VA)@ 12VAC 0.6 1.5 •4,000-volt system surge protection helps guard against system power surges and irregularities. Efficacy(L/W) 33 45 45 46 •Customizable mounting bracket with breakaway corner tabs that allow for easier installations in retrofit applications. •Bracket is designed as an installation template with centering notch and screw pilot holes for installation guidance when mounting off bracket. Fixture Environmental Light Source Integrated LED Environmental Protection Rating Wet IP67 Color Temperature 2700K,3000K Operation Ambient Temperature -25°C-+40°C Color Rendering Index 80+ Expected Life Time(1-70) 50K Hours Binning 3 Step Mechanical&Housing Specification Beam Angle 108' Fixture can be used in UP or DOWN position Length/Width/Height: Input 16100 3.5"x.78"x.75" 16101 6"x.78"x.75" Input Voltage Range 9—15V 16102 12"x.78"x.75" AC or DC with no 16103 18"x.78"x.75" loss in light output Bracket Depth 3" Input Frequency 47—63Hz Housing Material Aluminum,Brass Power Factor .6 @ 12V Housing Color&Surface AZT,BKT,CBR,GRY,SD Lumens Weight: 3.5"Hardscape(16100) 10 16100 Alum 0.4Lb,Brass 0.55Lb 6"Hardscape(16101) 40 16101 Alum 0.45Lb,Brass 0.8Lb 12"Hardscape(16102) 85 16102 Alum 0.91-b,Brass 1.31-b 18"Hardscape(16103) 125 16103 Alum 1.2Lb,Brass 1.65Lb AVAILAE'•I.E FINISHES Body ■ AZT ■ BKT ■ CBR Textured Textured Centennial A380 Aluminum,C360 Brass casting Architectural Black Brass Bronze Wire 18 AWG,SPT-1W,105°C,300V,84"usable length ■ GRY SD Textured Textured Optics Gray Sand Custom optics with a diffused lens provides smooth, uniform light distribution to eliminate glare and hotspots Included Accessories 304 stainless steel masonry bracket,off-bracket mounting kit,and 2 gel-filled wire nuts KICHLER® Power Wire Gauge/Length/(ft/m)Load Chart GENERAL FIXTURE SPACING GUIDELINE (VA) 10 AWG 12 AWG 14 AWG 16 AWG Item 16100(3.5") 116101(6") 116102(12") 116103(18") 0-20 VA 1860'/567 m 11501/351 m 7301/223 m 4507137 m Mounting Height Recommended Spacing(center-to-center of fixtures) 40 VA 9307283 m 5807177 m 3707113 m 230770 m 6"-18" 3'-4' 4'-5' 6'-B' 6'-8' 60 VA 6207189 m 3901/119 m 240773 m 150746 m 24" T-4' 4-5' _ 6'-8' 6'-8' 80 VA 4707143 m 290788 m 180755 m 110734 m 36" T-4' 4'-6' 6'-8' 6'-8' 100 VA 3707113 m 12301/70 m 1140743 m 90727 m 48" T-4' 4'-6' 6'-8' 6'-8- >100 VA Consult Technical Support 60" T-4' 4'-6' 1 6'-8' 6'-8' Highlighted values are optimal selections for mounting height application Tip:Use centering notch on mounting bracket to aid in spacing layout during installation. 1 Item Number for Product xture Size Ordering Guide 16100=3.5"Hardscape AZT=Textured Architectural Bronze 27=2700K,Warm White (product number 16101 =6"Hardscape BKT=Textured Black 30=3000K,Pure White breakdown) 16102=12"Hardscape CBR=Centennial Brass 16103 =18"Hardscape GRY=Textured Gray SD=Textured Sand Exampl- 16101 CBR 30 1 6 1 01 C B R 30 FOOT-CANDLES(108°BEAM ANGLE) Lateral distance from fixture Lateral distance from fixture Mounting 0 1 ft. 2 ft. 3 ft. 4 ft. Mounting 0 1 ft. 2 ft. 3 ft. 4 ft. Height Height Foot- 6 in. 17.96 0.44 0.01 0.00 0.00 Foot- 6 in. 72.60 , 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 candles candles 1 ft. 4.49 1.14 0.11 0.01 0.02 1 ft. 18.15 3.78 0.22 0.01 0.03 2 ft. 1.12 0.76 0.28 0.09 0.03 2 ft. 4.54 2.88 0.94 0.23 0.05 3 ft. 0.50 0.42 0.25 0.13 0.06 3 ft. 2.02 1.65 0.93 0.42 0.16 Lateral distance from fixture Lateral distance from fixture Mounting 0 1 ft. 2 ft. 3 ft. 4 ft. Mounting 0 1 ft. 2 ft. 3 ft. 4 ft. Height Height Foot- 6 in. 143.2 2.68 0.02 0.00 0.00 Foot- 6 in. 216.4 3.25 0.01 : 0.00 0.00 candles candles 1 ft. 35.81 ' 8.31 0.67 0.06 0.11 1 ft. 54.10 12.28 0.81 0.05 0.13 2 ft. 8.95 5.86 " 2.08 0.58 0.17 2 ft. 13.53 8.88 3.07 0.79 0.20 3 ft. 3.98 3.29 1.93 0.92 0.39 3 ft. 6.01 4.99 . 2.90 1.36 0.56 KICHLER Fixture does not illuminate Verify power connections.Review installation guide for installation problem.Insure manual reset breaker has not been tripped. Fixture turns off Verify power connections.Review installation guide for installation problems.Insure manual reset breaker has not been tripped.Checkvoltage drop at fixture. Fixture trips breaker Check installation for a possible short or overload state.Isolate the identified short and replace affected fixture or remove fixture(s)installed in overload. UL 1838 Issued:2003/01/13 Ed:3 Rev:2015/01/13 Low Voltage Landscape Lighting Systems. CSA C22.2#250.7Issued:2007/11/01(R2012) Ed:1 Extra-low-voltage landscape lighting systems—General Instruction No.1:2008. Contact:layouts@kichler.com 1.Chip binning ranges:(2700K 80+CRI:3 step),(3000K 80+CRI:3 step).LED chip data measured in accordance to IES LM-80 See Kichler.com/Warranty for warranty details. 2.Fixture has a 90%confidence luminous flux range to stated 3000K CCTtarget.Photometric (flux and color)data has been measured in accordance to IES LM-79. Consult Kichler Advanced Product Solutions 3.Actual efficacy value can be calculated as follows:Lumen value divided by average power for additional product support and design consumption. layouts by visiting Kichler.com/APS. 4.Do not extend beyond the recommended maximum run length. 5.Recommend product be installed with 10 or 12 gauge wire. 6.Recommend 80%load/20%overhead rule forfixture load planning in reference tothe powersource. Calculating fixture loading this way provides additional resource for fixture adjustmentand lossdue to voltage drop due to wire run lengths. 7.We reserve the right to modify and improve the design ofour fixtures without prior notice.We cannot guarantee to match existing installed fixtures for subsequent orders or replacements in regards to product appearance,CCT,or lumen output. 8.Do not modify product beyond instructions or warranty will be void. 16100AZT27 16101 BKT27 16102GRY27 16103CBR27 3.5"x.78"x.75" 6"x.78"x.75" 12"x.78"x.75" 18"x.78"x.75" Visit Kichler.com/Hardscape KIGHLER. r 5 ALEDXS RAB Project: Type: Prepared By. Date: Driver Info LED Info Type Constant Current Watts 32/24/16W 120V 0.26A/0.19A/0.13A Color Temp 3000/4000/5000K 208V 0.16A/0.12A/0.08A Color Accuracy 82-84CRI Color:Bronze Weight:3.9 lbs 240V 0.14A/0.10A/0.07A L70 Lifespan 100,000 Hours 277V 0.1 2A/0.09A/0.06A Lumens 2,020-4,1511m Input Watts 14.8-31.2W Efficacy 123.8-148.5 Im/W Technical Specifications Field Adjustability Dimming Driver. Optical Field Adjustable: Driver includes dimming control wiring for O-10V BUG Rating: Field Adjustable Light Output: dimming systems.Requires separate 0-10V DC 32W:B1 UO G1 32W/24W/l6W(factory default:24W) dimming circuit.Dims down to 10%. 24W:B1 UO G1 Color temperature selectable by 3000K,4000K and 16W:B7 UO G1 5000K(factory default:4000K) THD: 6.58%at 120V,11.18%at 277V LED Characteristics Compliance LEDs: UL Listed: Power Factor Long-life,high-efficacy,surface-mount LEDs Suitable for wet locations 99.5%at 720V,92.3%at 277V Photocell: Color Consistency: DLC Listed: 7-step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve This product is on the Design Lights Consortium Integrated photocell included with on/off switch consistent fixture-to-fixture color (DLC)Qualified Products List and is eligible for Surge Protection: rebates from DLC Member Utilities. Color Unlformilly: DLC Product Code:S-NCGC4X L-L 2 kV;L-G 4 kV RAB's range of Correlated Color Temperature follows the guidelines ofthe American National Standard for Electrical Aux Power Supp{y Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Driver. Yes Lighting(SSL)Products,ANSI C78.377-2017. 32W:Constant Current,Class 2,120-277V,50/60 Dim to Off. Hz,120V:0.26A,208V:0.16A,240V:0.14A,277V: Construction 0.12A Yes Full Cutoff 24W:Constant Current,Class 2,120-277V,50/60 Performance Allows for conformance to the IDA's fully shielding HZ,120V:0.19A,208V:0A 2A,240V:0.10A,277V: requirement,emitting no light above 90 degrees. 0.09A Llfespan: 16W.Constant Current,Class 2,120-277V,50/60 100,000-Hour LED lifespan based on IESIm-80 results Housing: HZ,720V:0.13A,208V:0.08A,240V:0.07A,277V: and TM-21 calculations Die-cast aluminum 0.06A Lens: Acrylic lens M0� IT7 CD MAR 3 U SOU,... . { PLAU 1 J Need hAp- Ilt2 2-11 mail:techsupport@mbllghtingcomWebsite:www.rabilghdng.com Copyright©2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Pagel of 3 ALEDXS RAB Technical Specifications(continued) Reflector. High reflection polycarbonate Cold Weather Starting: The minimum starting temperature is-40°F(-40°C) Ma)dmum Ambient Temperature: Suitable for use in up to 104°F(40°C) Green Technology: Mercury and UV free.RoHS-compliant components. Effective Projected Area: 0.1 Finish: Formulated for high durability and long-lasting color Installation Mounting: integrated j-box and an optional wall plate included. Other 5-Year,No-Compromise Warranty: RAB warrants that our LED products will be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of five(5)years from the date of delivery to the end user,including coverage of light output,color stability,driver performance and fixture finish.RAB's warranty is subject to all terms and conditions found at rablightir1a.com/warranty. Dimensions Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupporterablightingAmm Website:www.rabllghdngcom Copyright O 2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 3 ALEDXS FLAB 13 1/4" 2 5/16" 2 9/16" 5" Ordering Matrbc Family Size/Wattage Color Temp Finish Driver Options ALED XS XXS=13/10/6W Blank=3000/4000/5000KCCT Adjustable Blank=Bronze Blank=120-277V,0-10V Blank=integrated Photocell )IS=32/24/16W W=White Dimming /LCBS/MVS=Lightcloud Blue w/ Blank=150/120/100W MVS Sensor Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport®rabllghdng.com Website:www.rablighting.com Copyright©2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 3 of 3 PS4-11-10D2 RAC' Project: `Type: I�� Date: Square steel poles drilled for 2 Area Lights at 180°.Designed for ground mounting.Poles are stocked nationwide for quick shipment.Protective packaging ensures poles arrive at the job site good as new. Color:Bronze Weight:72.8lbs Technical Specifications Compliance Wall Thickness. Max EPA's/Max Weights: CSA Listed: 1/8" 701VIPH 28.8 ft/800 lb. Suitable for wet locations 80MPH 21.6 ft/5101b. Shaft Size: 90MPH 16.5 ft/510lb. Construction 4" 100MPH 12.9 ft/51 0 lb. Shaft 110MPH 10.3 ft/500 lb. Hand Hole Dimensions: 120MPH 8.3 ft/4951b. 46,000 p.s.i.minimum yield. 3"x S" 130MPH 6.7 ft/495 lb. 140MPH 5.5 ft/485 lb. Hand Holes: 150MPH 4.5 ft/480 lb 8 1/ Reinforced with grounding lug and removable cover lt Circle.2" Other Base Plates: Base Dimension: Terms of Sale: Slotted base plates 36,000 p.s.i. g" Pole Terms of Sale is available online. Shipping Protection: Anchor Bolt: All poles are shipped in individual corrugated cartons to prevent finish damage Anchor bolt kits are sold separately.Order ABK4-11- BCK-S4 for anchor bolt kits. Color Anchor Bolt Templates: Bronze powder coating WARNING Template must be printed on 11"x 17" Height. sheet for actual size.CHECK SCALE BEFORE USING. 1 o ft Templates shipped with anchor bolts and available online. Weight: 73 lbs Gauge: 11 Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport@rablighting.comWebsite:www.rablighting.com Copyright©2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 1 of 2 PS4-11-10D2 RAB Dlmensions Features Designed for ground mounting Gauge•it1-11" Heavy duty TGIC polyester coating Reinforced hand holes with grounding lug and removable cover for easy wiring access Pole caps,base covers&bolts are sold separately Custom manufactured for each application 4' 10, �. 3ra Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupportorablighting.com Website:wwwjaWighting.com Copyright O 2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 2 SA-MUB RAB Project Type: Prepared By: Date: Driver Info LED Info Type Constant Current Watts 8W 120V 0.07A Color Temp 3000K 208V 0.04A Color Accuracy 83 CRI Color:Bronze Weight:4.6 lbs 240V 0.04A L70 Lifespan 100,000 Hours 277V 0.04A Lumens 2431m Input Watts 8.3W Efficacy 29.5 Technical Specifications Compliance Electrical Gaskets: UL Listed: Driver. High-temperature silicone Suitable for wet locations Constant Current,Class 2,120-277V,50/60 Hz,120V: 0.07A,208V:0.04A,240V:0.04A,277V:0.04A Finish: IP Rating: Formulated for high durability and long-lasting color Ingress protection rating of IP65 for dust and water THD: 8.4%at 120V,21.8%at 277V Green Technology: IESNA LM-79&LM-80 Testing: Mercury and UV free.RoHS-compliant components. RAB LED luminaires and LED components have been Power Factor tested by an independent laboratory in accordance 99%at 120V,21.8%at 277V Installation with IESNA LM-79 and LM-80. Mounting: Dim to OfF 3pcs anchor bolts for mounting Trade Agreements Act Compliant: No This product is a product of Cambodia and a Optical "designated country"end product that complies Aux Power Supply BUG Rating: with the Trade Agreements Act No BO UO GO LED Characteristics Construction Other LEDs: Cold Weather Starting: 5-Year Limited Warranty: Long-life,high-efficacy,discrete,surface-mount The minimum starting temperature is-407(-40°C) The RAB 5-year,limited warranty covers light output, LEDs driver performance and paint finish.RAB's warranty Maximum AmbleWTemperature: is subject to all terms and conditions found at Color ConslstenCy: Suitable for use in up to 113°F(45°C) rablightino.com/warranty, 7-step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve consistent fixture-to-fixture color Housing: Die-cast aluminum Color Uniformity: RAB's range of Correlated Color Temperature follows ems: the guidelines of the American National Standard for Glass (SSL)Products,ANSI C78.377-2017. Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport®rabllghting.com Website:www.rabllghting com Copyright©2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 1 of 2 SA-MUB RAB Dimensions Features IP65 rated 100,000-Hour LED lifespan 5-Year Limited Warranty 0 Ordering Matrix Family Shape Type Color Temp Finish Voltage Options SA MU MU MUSHROOM B=Bollard Blank=3000K Blank=Matte Bronze Blank=120-277V Blank=No Option WP=Wall Sconce Blank=2200-4000K Tunable White' /RGB=16+million colors 'Applies to RGB models only Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport®rabilghting.com Website:www.rablighting.com Copyright O 2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 2 FSLEDH3Y/120 RAB Type: Date: Driver Info LED Info Type Constant Current Watts 3W 120V 0.108A Color Temp 3000K(Warm) 208V N/A Color Accuracy 82 CRI FSLED Steplights 3W.Suitable for both indoor and outdoor use.Easy installation into a 240V N/A L70 Lifespan 100,000 Hours recessed 2"x 4"jbox.Available in vertical or horizontal models either with trims ortrimless. 277V N/A Lumens 37 Im Color:Bronze Weight:0.4 lbs Input Watts 3W Efficacy 12.3 Im/W Technical Specifications Compliance Performance Green Technology: UL Listed: Lifespan• Mercury and UV free.RoHS-compliant components. Suitable for wet locations 100,000-Hour LED lifespan based on IESIm-80 results andTM-21 calculations Installation IP Rating: Mounting: Ingress protection rating of IP66 for dust and water Wattage Equivalency: Recessed junction box.Horizontal models. Equivalent to 5W/T3 IESNA LM-79&LM-80 Testing: Other RAB LED luminaires and LED components have been Construction 5-Year,No-Compromise Warranty: tested by an independent laboratory in accordance Housing: RAB warrants that our LED products will be free from with IESNA LM-79 and LM-80. Precision die-cast aluminum defects in materials and workmanship for a period of five(5)years from the date of delivery to the end LED Characteristics Trim: user,including coverage of light output,color LEDs: 1/2"Trim stability,driver performance and fixture finish.RAB's Long-life,high-efficacy,surface-mount LEDs warranty is subject to all terms and conditions found Maximum AmblentTemperature: at rablightina.com/warranty. Color Stability: Suitable for use in up to 104`F(40"C) LED color temperature is warrantied to Shift no more Electrical than 200K in color temperature over a 5-year period Cold Weather Starting: THD: The minimum starting temperature is-40°F(-40°C) 31.4%at 120V Color Unlform)ty: RAB's range of Correlated Color Temperature follows Lens: Power Factor the guidelines of the American National Standard for Tempered glass lens 94.8%at 120V Specifications forthe Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting(SSL)Products,ANSI C78.377-2017. Gases: High-temperature silicone Finish: Formulated for high durability and long-lasting color Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport@rabllghtingcom Website:www.rabllghting com Copyright Q 2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 1 of 2 FSLEDH3Y/120 RAB' Dimensions Features Easy installation into a recessed 2"x 4"job Deep regress of light source eliminates glare Concealed hardware for a clean,sophisticated look Suitable for both indoor and outdoor use r'3 5-Year,No-Compromise Warranty 76 mm 1 9/16" 40 m m 5 127 mm Ordering Matrix Family Orientation Wattage Color Temp Finish Ddiver Trim Options FRED H 3 Y /120 H=Horizontal 3=3W N=4000K Neutral Blank=Bronze /120=120V Blank=Surface Plate V=Vertical Y=3000KWarm W=White /277=277V /TL=TrimlessMount YY=2700K Residential Warm B=Black 5=Matte Silver Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport@rabllghting.com Website:www.rabilghting.com Copyright o 2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 2 SLEM RAB' Project. Type: Prepared By: Date: Driver Info LED Info Type Constant Current Watts 5W 120V 0.1A Color Temp 3000K(Warm) 208V 0.06A Color Accuracy 87 CRI Square LED Step Lights.Equivalent to 13 Watt CFL or 40 Watt incandescent.Applications 240V 0.05A L70 Lifespan 100,000 Hours for steps,decks,landscape and entries.Meets ADA requirements.5-year,no-compromise 277V 0.049A Lumens 128 Im warranty. Input Watts 5.3W Efficacy 24.21m/W Color.Bronze Weight:1.5 Ibs Technical Specifications Compliance Voltage: LED Characteristics UL Listed: 120-277V Color Consistency: Suitable for wet locations.Suitable for mounting 3-step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve within 4 ft.of the ground. Surge Protection: consistent fixture-to-fixture color 1000 Volts IESNA LM-79&LM-80 Testing: Lumen Maintenance: RAB LED luminaires and LED components have been Construction The LED will deliver 70%of its initial lumens at tested by an independent laboratory in accordance Finish: 100,000 hours of operation with IESNA LM-79 and LM-80. Formulated for high durability and long-lasting color Color Temperature: Dark Sky Conformance: Cold Weather Starting: 3000K Allows for conformance to the IDA's fully shielding The minimum starting temperature is-407(-40°C) requirement,emitting no light above 90 degrees. Other Maximum AmblentTemperature: Patents: Trade Agreements Act Compliant: Suitable for use in up to 104'F(40°C) The design of the SLED Lights are protected by U.S. This product is a product of Cambodia and a Pat.612,975,Canada Pat.133101,and China Pat. "designated country"end productthat complies Green Technology: ZL201030129140.1. with the Trade Agreements Act Mercury and UV free.RoHS-compliant components. 5-Year,No-Compromise Warranty. Performance Housing: RAB warrants that our LED products will be free from Lifespan: Precision die-cast aluminum housing and mounting defects in materials and workmanship for a period of 100,000-Hour LED lifespan based on IESIm-80 results plate Qunction box not included) five(5)years from the date of delivery to the end and TM-21 calculations user,including coverage of light output,color Gaskets: stability,driver performance and fixture finish.RAB's Wattage Equivalency: High-temperature silicone warranty is subject to all terms and conditions found Equivalent to 13W CFL or 60W Incandescent at rablighting.com/warranty. Electrical Driver. 4W high output long life LED.Driver Constant Current,Class 2,50-60 Hz,100-240 VAC 0.18 amps. Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupport@rabllghting.com Website:wwwjablighting.com Copyright©2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 1 of 2 SLEM RAB Dimensions Features Sry 5 Watt,High output LED 12.7 cm l 100,000-hour life Superior heat sinking with die cast aluminum housing Meets ADA Requirements Junction Box Not Included S" -- 127cm — 3" i.6cn�l Need help?Tech help line:(888)722-1000 Email:techsupportarablighting.com Website:www.rablighting.com Copyright m 2026 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 2 i Nicholas J. Planamento, member Jewell on Main, LLC 53795 Main Road,Southold NY 11971 631-948-0143ED, L» ti _. July 23,2026 2 �� ����� ", 202� Jim Rich,Chairman, SOUTHOLD TOWN Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Chairman Rich and Members of the Planning Board: I am deeply disappointed by letters of support solicited on behalf of the Southold Free Library that characterize me and my business as opportunistic or as seeking to take library property for personal gain.That characterization is both unfair and inaccurate. My objection to this application is based on a fundamental,decades-long and still-unresolved issue:the library has repeatedly sought to expand its facilities and programming without assuming a corresponding responsibility to provide adequate,safe and reliable parking or to protect its neighbor's lawful access to private parking. I respectfully request that the fallowing documents,obtained earlier today from the Town of Southold Planning Board's files concerning the library's numerous prior expansion proposals, be added to the record: 1989 Planning Board-approved site plan for the library expansion.This appears to be the plan upon which the library's current site configuration is substantially based. It required the applicant to provide 30 on-site parking spaces.The file indicates that the library received a waiver or reduction of its parking requirement based upon its ability to use parking at the adjoining Feather Hill shopping center.As the Board is now aware,that arrangement no longer benefits the library and apparently has not done so for more than a decade. 2010 letter from Town Engineer Jamie Richter.This correspondence specifically identifies the parking and access issue involving the adjoining property at 53795 Main Road,which is owned by Jewell on Main LL . It is significant because it documents the longstanding and still unresolved concern that the library's plans interfere with access to the private parking area behind that building. • 2013 closed/inactive site-plan application.That plan reflects a Planning Board requirement for 50 parking spaces. • 2026 pending amended site plan.The current plan depicts only 15 parking spaces. It remains unclear which previously approved site plan the present application seeks to amend.The application's title "Parking Amended Site Plan" itself suggests that parking should be a central component of the Board's review, rather than a secondary concern overshadowed by the proposed greenspace, pocket park, outdoor auditorium and related amenities. This should not be a guessing game. A review of the library's prior files reveals one recurring issue: parking and access to parking. Through a succession of applications involving different combinations of adjoining parcels,the library has repeatedly pursued expanded facilities and programming while attempting to shift the resulting parking demand onto limited public, municipal or privately owned parking resources. The available parking serving the hamlet center is already limited and heavily burdened.The Town- owned lot together with the separately owned Southold Park District property which is itself a potentially developable parcel appears to provide only slightly more than 30 spaces, combined, for broad public use throughout the hamlet center, apart from limited on-street parking.Those spaces cannot reasonably be treated as dedicated or permanently available parking for the library. The record therefore raises several important questions: How has this longstanding parking and access issue remained unresolved through numerous applications before multiple Town boards?On what legal and factual basis may the library continue to rely upon parking that it does not own or control?And why should Jewell on Main LLC the adjoining property most directly affected by the proposal be required to bear the burden of the Library's expanded programming through interference with access to its private rear parking area and the quiet use and enjoyment of its property? The library's public mission does not eliminate its obligation to demonstrate that its proposed expansion can be accommodated safely and appropriately on its own property,without shifting its impacts onto adjoining owners or already limited public parking resources. Given the applicant's failure to demonstrate adequate, legally available parking;the continuing uncertainty regarding the approved site plan purportedly being amended; and the unresolved effect of the proposal upon Jewell on Main LLC's access and property rights, I respectfully request that the Planning Board deny this application immediately.The applicant should not be permitted to obtain approval while these fundamental deficiencies remain unresolved or to shift the impacts of its proposed expansion onto neighboring property owners and limited public parking resources. Respectfully submitted, Nicholas J. Planamento •. — 'f: �,•: iti.�f°,N,4{.T,WEAICtN6.CdCiRSl;� -r- �';' L t"�I (� L�-���� •.l�'� ;45PHALT�ASB_CoURSB - 1 LAfAp SY�AWL TorAt. SEA I�G c�p�c,iT�( l2o s -rs k I:Y T�f r Tl �ol.�l pa + `` CtIKb ISLE rAl2f if_IG� Nyt Visco�Y -6-4091.o. 2oo►�rllFs • f' K IAf�I - 12, 1� tJcT 19PAcF 14 sEATs = 3o sf s { 6►zata� ; l_ A ! ALE fJF21Y�I�lAY VISco P�-S-'4D9fA 2 PS � • PI 11-0,E It}' sr>=tpr16Er2G1 4-u2^lBTt� 2ooi,1 NFs 4 ■ E k. iSRAVEL. \� G-I sPo1 1-uiN act, h} ATGr 1-41-Gr• fir'► SFeT at-JfEn- AT RAtx P+zE�auT� �ap02 I \\\ O c-5 SI'oT N141 N r2o•LAt.JrJ A,7dq12APQ PRcnu�ST E S i 20 FG7 i5o�(fz-4D �� 11 -• (7-1 P�LLARP WAt_Kf JAY 3 STGRrJER- A1,IF�AfLt7t_IS eo��w: oo Pps \\\ a \ E-i F�IALL LJAIK�PL4+�FfE#L f 2b" � sr 2082P 2fo L�AL .�f i �� P e�i' ,}�.:: � I • �xT4 Cot-+a�T-�Ts«�k,r-,�r vrsl-�- �—_-'\ .. 4 F, ..._ .,.._ „�.<,_ .. _.: 1 N�F' S��FFc>U,�. GOLI!•ITY r .CIRBI�i� DETAIL X, i' 1'1/2• V-o" N fF r • - t5[iner>�cNCE n�a.-!y t_,...,�«xT'4•) 3SR 508.03' k _ • ' S.28 28 40 E• x ift Lill ,r . kv - L .: a .. , , I. M,,.-... ,•.. :. .: .r . .ill,.l,r.±:o t. ...,:. a J•. • '}t,,,.„(. • •✓;I r'i.I.,rt .. • 8+4P - 3<6 1 1 - G n, -..+.. tt ....,. a ,.r ;,l, r. >�.A.1 "" - _=yM r ( i AP-Md-OF t ` -i, w,ixd:. �.:j •:.,:,.,r;� ,, .�. ��.< w ,•f t h,r-l:i x. ! r :�: $., - • ro .•a.. •.n r.,; 1'. s `Y..il v..; , i- w 't- ur K� f7'. _ ,. r.,r, ..r� t =1� �r Y,,,�r r.• .•.}.. ,. ;,. .,tl; ,,n • a �: 14 t9' xrq. t ;._ .. .. _,... „�:-. t G,- ..::. t:!': -,..,.1 • !;}1, -.:., �'t...n 1 1 ;. ,:'- ', stA• ¢xrGY,a - .. � ,i-:. O .. .. .. :..,._. ,<<a ,. -.f v .rr•;•. r,.,.. .....,,- i,(.,,.. e,. t f£x« �.7:. -'�- ty. .•4 fx�+•c•+ -. .. ...,- 3 a � i.ir. .1:.t„'7' 4, .. � • ,} iSr-..»•�..:-:f-°..f tll:t.i Fs,Y \ - €..`°i - 1,� - '- .-rw m"H.L ,... i,.,., r,;:. ,.. , • >.. ..- ..-: -• ....,.,r,..,,,e is,. ,V,i ., c: '.�y. - s > � ' ,. . r...1 .... .., i ,.s .::..•fir.. .,.-. • w:", ....,".<. ,fl.,,.i f .s--< ::>t.,... - �.:. .•� --,.. :- : ..: •a . A r...,, ,, a ..-,>. .,..r..i ,...,..-., ,.� .: ,s,r .,c d,. GE•. 1^fi �eKt tD' h:. �- PR POND f r E fF E e e ( s 1 • C 1• t-� ... ---• it'll ;+ A r.t , ... :: e } . uA g. .I. I- it ,,,., . :.. •ti AY�1{SON >< , j. ,• ), f . �.-. .;,i , J` .:•� '. ,,_ .•e w - 1 } + t 7 If' .It t 1 I �4•s - 'r�cocr rr z :!.Fr, E -t�tG : • 1� .it• - - r c' P�U It; INS ,�• &- .♦ ....-, -. .' •.:,.... -:mac ..+' ... •.: -. ���-�• �- ..>..... -�,a- ..,... , .:., .. ,�: ., .> .� mil.• , -.:. ,..,g.,.. ., ,. .. 1.1 fb'f3 f5 . ' ..,. ..>., .. . ::. ,. ::. �! -ltrL.C'�`••!t ,.�;. s-.,. t'...K .. .,.- ... `.„ 2 33 +-ice+ ` ..' ...,v.,. .«;�'". ._. <•..,. ,.... ... <,..,._-...... , -�-. ,•_,:�.> -� - .. _ -- I _ .. ... , .>., r - :.... �, .,, .." �f.,•d'.•>�.-g:�-,a�,.:..,�, .;.:, -. -- -� „>s<: -'2,e t►ytTb SGPTifi I •�.F . --. r faA� d Y$+ n 1 r WA Y p All•:.:' ,: `' : � IMES CD ... � .�. za r , ,..< iQ :.:.,., .....,., .,�„.. F. ...., > .r ,;_..., ;., ,.. :.,,.> .. `. .s- ,.,,: a ... :.'•.': __ .h ",+- F�: >t , ,. ; t•., ,> •.+: .,i, -.:, :. ..:.: •-_ ...1H- .,, ..,..,:s,.....:..,.. '1. ... s,h...f. r,it.-. i,.r t., +.` :, � ?«-' «i c x, �. .: , • w •1 ty • r{+-' a k%i 2°+3 •,>.7 wsMai nt , y•� !•_X S IJ LnN ,.IGE dl_ON LIw11= "r�:7CK 1 TO CCMdT.I,../ •,0, - 1 �y r • � i ,I _ .: J{ ly+ "-, ,�• rit'b i .� \-��\•*.•'S.\'L\`'>-� �f - 5:i' 1 f.. I•r'.;. - PARKING TO•2CM6 N M+ \\\ i >\ t PARKING: , , �` � Ate•G A� \\ :a i 'e�ITS +�Cc,20 SF ��.,\ cam A.�E� PARKIN D A A ExlsTirJG c.�`fAc�E 72q gF O W N E R: 1 Pf�os rave lil� 2 324•s (i SOUTHOID FREE't1BRA'RY \ € MAINr>ROAD' ' SOL7HOL0,NEW''YORK` \ €ki�T i PIa Oit'aS 1 .SS f t TAX MAP NUMBER } : 000061*—J=1`4` FEATHER HiLL RETAIL CENTER' .,ZONING: - \.\ t�1fF= F�UCDgG— P,F-6.L I GDF--1` F€ ,HAMLET BU�SINESS, sIT>=PLar.1'rare coo'Prz a,.n s�evt£Z- �� - �J ^,. PJY;.RGo♦b IZiG•G vA+..l T„IyL,A.G.LIGG•�-�n.. . _ - •: :.!: TT :20 JoNus�-�� t APF C>VED BY. pLAWNIR G,WARD � .X GYJ.00 •- SPOT ct_CVA.Tr01JS. - 5ta/pr,O ds x az TO M1cAN ae,.�c mot, I O3f90!OF SO UTHOLO r _ , k _ ;r S ER , SITE :FLAN, ' 'ADH '�• 7 , , SAM i L t�E S TE;.. & S ELMAN#s E , r Ea , a, t...ti i.Il y • �•� P e R MT 8 K:.. _� . (Op 7 3-4�-.r 8-=4-0'�5OJTHOL, N W (C, GUT.CS kOG1E. � :, •, :, ,. � t iv- , , t� e , a . IL SCOTT A. RUSSELL JAMES A. RICHTER, oA* SUPERVISOR : ENGINEER TOWN HAIL 309 MAI'N ROAD TOWN N OF SOUTH OLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. 31)-7 -9015 ro) �"',}�� Tel.( 31)-7 -1560 JAMIE.RI HTE @T WN SOUTHOW.NY.US OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN of SOUT HOLD Martin H. Sidor September 8, 2010 Chairman - Planning Board Torn Hall, 53095 !Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Southold Free Library Site Plan Review s TM##: 100 - 1- 1-1 , 1 .1 & 15.2 Dear Mr. Sidor: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the site Plan, dated 09/18/09 for the construction of additions and alterations to the Southold Free Library. This site plan has been prepared by the office of Gary Jacquernin,Architect and Robert stronnski,Architecture,Pe and has a revision date of /1 /1 . Please consider the following: 1. The Southold Free Library Site is made up of three 3 individual Tax Map parcels. Tax Map Parcel#14 is o' in width and extends out in a northerly direction across Traveler street to the LIf Property. This portion of the property has not been shorn on the site plan as part of the proposed development. Enclosed you will find and aerial vier highlighting this area. It is recommended that this area be outlined with meets and bounds descriptions and be offered for dedicated to the Town as part of this Site Plan Application. . The southerly portion of this site plan terminates along state Route 25. it is recommended that this site plan be submitted to the state DOT for review and comment. A state DOT curb Cut Permit or a letter of non jurisdiction should be required. 3. Access to the adjacent site noted as "53795 Southold Properties LLC"will be restricted b the proposed construction. it appears that the existing drive will be narrowed by as much a %of its currentwidth and would prevent parking in the rear yard of this adjacent parcel. The Planning Board should consider requiring the applicant to verify all access easements and/or property rights of the adjacent parcel prior to authorizing these improvements, . Drainage calculations have been provided and meet the minimum requirements of Torn Code chapter 236 for storm Water Management. . The Drainage design needs to provide additional information. The proposed catch Basins and leaching pools should be labeled and/or numbered in a manner that corresponds back to the Drainage Calculations. The size and type of drainage piping used must be indicated or shown on the plan. All leaching pools and/or catch basins should be noted with an overall size and section details should be provided for each different structure type. The plan must also indicate all top of grate and pipe invert elevations to ensure that the functionality of the proposed drainage swaie areas. Page 1 of Air Martin H. Sidor, Chairman- Planning Board September 8, 2010 Re: Southold Free Library site Plan Review SCT 1 #: 1000- 1- 1-1 , 15.1 & 15.2 Page 2 of . Three Drainage Swale areas have been indicated on the site plan. Will these areas be excavated dowry to sand? What will be planted at this bottom contour? Will the inlet grates on the leaching pools shown in these areas be raised above the bottom elevation of the drainage Swale? A cross section detail should be provided to indicate the intent of the proposed design and the overall capacity of the proposed Swale areas should be noted or indicated on the plan. . The Landscaping Plan must be coordinated with the Drainage Plan. some of the proposed trees appear to be positioned over drainage structures that are located within the proposed drainage swales. Trees and landscaping should not be planted over leaching pools. In addition, if the swale areas are designed to accornmodate additional drainage capacity they should not be grassed over. Vegetation & planting that is tolerant of sandy soils should be used to enhance the capability of these drainage swale areas. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. c rely, Ow runes A. Rich ear, R.A. 1 e : Peter Harris, Highway Superintendent Martin Finnegan,Town Attorney GARY JACQUEMIN GENERAL INFORMATION ARCHITECT RIVERHEAD �EW YORK 1 1901 115 rRIFFING AVE LocATa4 OF SITE:T"OF SOUT14OLD,SUFFOLK COUNTY PHONE(6311369-8630 PAX(631)369-9" SM MAIN ROAD,SCI NY IM mrFoLK cowry TAX MAP WvM�tM-MI-0-14(37,6w 1q ft), T-1 Woo-m-a-16.1(24^sq It),--d 10DO-M-,71-16.2(15,4R7 III;ft) i WHM DkSTRICT-*MU Mr-ANE55(M) TOTAL SIFE AREA-11,5M 52AZE FEET(1.7b ACRES) 0 INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY DOW By� RAYNOR,n4xG,I CARRMTON WRVEY�% it? LAND SURVEYOR % 77 JESSUP AVENUE % 1 0 OJOGUE,MY IFFA % .1 1 C, SURVEYED DATE,FEBRUARY 5,2006 0 A ttml'1) REVISED DATE,MARCH 26,2005 P.O.BOX 1254 J�ME&PORY'N 5'11 9�7 'ro PHONE(631)728S2 PARKING-CALCULATION CONSULTANTS ffiMtfi USE REMIRE1411IONTS A5 PER CODE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AUDITORIUM,MEETIW,HAU(1-11DRARY) I SPACE PER 50 SaARE FEET OF SEATING AREA, BUT NOT LESS THAN I PER 4 5FATS WERE RETNAIJER DESIGN PROVIDED 0013 AssocIATEs,LLC 50� 1.C% Landscape Architects&Planners PARKIW,REWIREMENT5 PROVIDED 6_5 1 173 So-th Street.St.J..-.NY 11780 LIBRARY mEtTING Room AREA- 1 00 '00.. PHONE:(631)979-5WO FAX:(631)979-&%C % %4 SF./W 5F.-R5 2o PARKjW.SPACES % 0 -elo LWART SEATS(ADDITIONAL) 151 Ile Av -1 CIVIL ENGINEER 12D SEATS/4-30 W PARKIW, 01, 'e 11 E.S.KALOGERAS,P.E. W PARKIC.SPACES TOTAL PAMIC.SPACES RWRW CONSULTING ENGINEER TOTAL ACTUAL PARKW.SPACES PROP05M)- 45 PARKIW.SPACES�NC W.4 NANDICAP SPACES 727 LIM-A-u.-RI,�*.d. NY 11901 LUDI �'O 4#0 TOTAL AD-JACENT MUNICIPAL SPACES PROVIDED 27 FARm.SPACES NCLUDINS.2 NANDICAP SPAM -4040 -4DD4 PHONE:(631)722 FAX:(631)722 '7 M.E.P.ENGINEER >1 '0 CP CHANNING,P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER 878-4542 FAX -4542 PHO�Bodp,ftmd,Monmille NY 11949 000� .40 "__, %"%P mod STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Z' 10.1 _11 11 0 1000' G . lb CONDON ENGINEERING,P.C. % CONSULTING ENGINEER 1755 S*igwbm Rwd,Mattituck.NY 11952 -tgN -2551 Vol PHONE:(631)299 FAX:(631)298 t0000 Proposed Addition for: ..000 Wo, Southold Free 141� > Library w 00. 53705 Main Road Southold,N.Y. 11971 S.C.T.M.# 1000-61-1-14,15.1,&15.2 Si 1E REVISIONS '4- _L3-23-10 Issued to ZBA A 4 4 a" tj 0- 117% w SUBJECT 0- PARCEL 4=1 k, 1A ON 0- 0- 0- - TEST HOLE DA TA 0 TEST RX-f DIA BY SEAL McDONALD GEDSCIENCE PC BOX m So A.9 5arniom,NY im I'�2 LOCATION MAP Scale,N.T.S. SITE Scale.0 W-01 DATE-SEPTEMBER 25,20M SCT.M.#WM-41-1-14,15,1 1 15�2 TEST HOLE-BI TEST HOLE-B2 0. 0' ZONING USE D15TRICT MINIMUM Lot AREA MINUNUM LOT WIDTH LOT MAXIMUM HEIGHT MINIMUM FRONT MINIMUM MINIMUM MINIMUM REAR LANDSCAPE MIXED SAND AND LDAM (SQUARE FEET) AT FRONT STREET COVERAGE OF 5UILDING5 YARD DEK14 EITHER 51DE COMBINED WIDT14 YARD DEPTH AREA(1) OF N (FEET) W (FEET) I YARD NIDT" FOR BOTH 51DE (FEET) MMM SAND,LOAM,FINES (FEET) YARDS(FEET) C.py�gbt 21M2-2���1�,S-16, A—ld—All�ghd'M�A—hi. MMLET BUSINESS�m) 20,XO 40 40 35 15 10 25 25 25 SH:i PALE BROWN FINE d-'Wo�-Pmdd"dw.-tu-u-ty-_y PROVIDED 77,%q IP5M MAIN RD.(Sk 25) BA 33.6 35.#8#MAIN RD. TO COARSE SAND Pth—C 16 t2b %A NfA 40.4 d--.i.. NY-1 S I%M TRAVELER ST. TRAVELER ST.I Ed---Th-�-g-Ap.,0 SW-PALE BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND I--.d--y.0p-j-,--p,by pf th�A�b 17l 17' P]ROJEC7 NO !OmARW2 51TE INFORMATION NM�NO WIER ENCOUNTERED WTE-NO WATER ENCOMERED �CAt_r! AS SHOH--.- 77— DRAWN BY LMC CHECKEDBY RS B.C.M.06 I — tcj=k EXIST1%BOTTOM OF CURB AND TOP OF CURB ELEVAT06 TITLE k4ZZ, PROPOSED 51ar ELEVATION 7MHM-B3 TW HOLE-84 00 0L,PARK BROWN I-MM �r J.P.;'v Exisrm Spur ELEVATION MIXED 5AND AND LOAM -0.5 Site MLr BROWN SILT FTC 33 601 PROPOSED BO7TOM OF CURB AND TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS [B.C.33.10 5.0' -3.0. Plan SC�BROWN CA-AYEY SAND EXISTIW.CONTOUR 5W,FALE BROWN NNE PROP05ED CONTOLIR SH,P&E BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAW TO C0AR5E&W S"EIET 17' 171 NOTE,NO WATER ENCOUNTERED NOTE:,NO WATER ENCOUNTERED S-1 LL_ SALTY ROOTS GARDEN&LANDSCAPE DESIGN FO BOX 804 Nllat-.tuck,NY 1'Q52 sallyrooisny.corn 0.315.900/1 Project El Southold Free Library Soul d,N Y PLAN NORTH EDI z EDI r EDI N3TH G�g.Bi- 0 Surveyor: 0 % JM Land Surveying D. PC Box`408- 17-1 SmithM*-',NY V-� f EDI EDI -7- 1-J A REDI Site Data: 0 m nn crtArea�K,8Q4 SOFT'l.28 acres! D I 0 D DI 2� DI SHADE SAIL +H D +LP +L W 0 25 + +HP- LP CD -E 7 D L NAR 3 0 2026 E C� KE REDI-Relocated Existing Drainage Inlet EDI-Existing Drainage Inlet DI-Drainage Inlet Landap3m Eroilect- ri ign: +LP Leaching Pool w/Drainage Inlet DA +HIP High Point I ARKING. Bollard Light 5out Libra[M PERMIT SET hold F Existing Post Light This project proposes combining two adjacent lots into a single lot and creating a new pocket park on the 6 Spots Wall Light site of the existing parking area at the Southold Free Library.The existing parking will be relocated to the Removin_q Masonry Light upper library entrance. 2 Spots Existing Spot/Door Light Title: Improvements include the construction of an ADA-compliant pathway,new stairs,a new retaining wall,a Adding -a Existing Post Light �.ite Develoloment Plan stacked stone amphitheater,seating areas,planting and lawn areas,and an activity area with a shade sail. 11 Spots o Electric Outlet Site amenities will include lighting throughout the park,a hose bib,electrical outlets,irrigation and the Total Hose Bib yLF0 A�?C, Scale: installation of a new storage shed. 15 Spots 011k. The project will involve tree removal and site grading,including the relocation of approximately 4,900 cubic Existing Trees -S ""o-P 9 i/16 10 feet of existing soil and the import of approximartely 31,380 cubic feet of clean fill/topsoil to achieve final grades and support the proposed improvements.Drainage inlets and dry wells will be installed to capture --dD—4'Privacy Fence Dra ed by: water runoff. ErirVallrt- L1 Wood Post and Rope Ga OF N Da�e'1J 11,26 Qh�"-�c'C From: joan@jbischofflaw.com Sent: Thursday,July 23, 2026 11:43 AM To: Michaelis, Jessica; Harvey Arnoff Subject: Supplemental Submission —Southold Free Library Site Plan Application Attachments: Lertter to the Planning Board 07232026.pdf PG >a L)(Sc.i MG J k E2 WI ME r Jn fi Dear Ms. Michaelis, SOUTHOLD TOWN K MM BOARD Attached please find a supplemental letter submitted on behalf of Jewell on Main, LLC for inclusion in the administrative record. While Jewell fully respects the right of members of the public to express support for the Library and its application, several recent submissions—including letters authored by members of the Library's Board of Trustees—contain factual mischaracterizations of Jewell's position and repeatedly attribute improper motives to neighboring property owners rather than addressing the planning issues before the Board. Unfortunately, these submissions also reflect a level of personal disparagement and lack of civility that is inconsistent with the respectful discourse that should accompany proceedings before the Planning Board. The attached letter respectfully requests that the Board evaluate the application based upon the competent planning evidence contained in the administrative record, rather than unsupported characterizations of the motives of neighboring property owners and longstanding Southold businesses. Because the attached letter addresses the evidentiary significance of materials already contained in the record, rather than presenting new evidence, Jewell respectfully requests that it be included in the administrative record and distributed to the Planning Board members for consideration during their deliberations. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Joan H. Bischoff Van Heemskerck Attorney for Jewell on Main, LLC Please confine receipt. BISCHOFF LAW PLLC Joan H Bischoff van Heemskerck Attorney at Law 1 ►m Joan@jbischofflaw.com Bischoff Law t. (631) 948-0234 PLLC 9 7160Oil A T T O R N E Y AT LAW Southold, Hld, NYons Lane Southold, NY 11971 Via Email Southold, July 23, 2026 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Re: Southold Free Library Site Plan Application 53705 and 53745 Main Road, Southold,New York SCTM Nos. 1000-61-1-15.2 and 15.5 Via email Dear Chairman Rich and Members of the Planning Board: Jewell on Main,LLC respectfully submits this supplemental letter concerning a number of recent letters filed in support of the Southold Free Library's pending site plan application. At the outset, Jewell wishes to make clear that it supports the Library's mission and fully respects the right of residents to express their views concerning the proposed project. The Library is an important public institution, and expressions of community support are both appropriate and valuable.Nothing in this submission is intended to discourage or diminish public participation. We also support the concept of the redevelopment in a different way in a different location, addressing the concerns raised before this Board. This letter addresses a different concern. The Library's longstanding parking deficiency is the problem; the neighboring property owners and the Southold commercial district should not be expected to bear the burden of that problem. The fundamental issue presented by this application is that the Southold Free Library has long experienced a substantial shortage of parking to accommodate its own operations. That longstanding deficiency has not been confined to the Library property. Rather, it has consistently spilled over onto adjoining properties and throughout Southold's historic commercial district, affecting neighboring businesses, their customers, employees, deliveries, loading operations,circulation, and the availability of parking throughout the downtown area. Jewell respectfully submits that the proposed redevelopment does not adequately resolve that longstanding parking deficiency. Instead, it perpetuates—and in several respects exacerbatesa condition in which the consequences of the Library's inadequate parking supply continue to be shifted onto neighboring properties while simultaneously impairing practical access to parking located on the Jewell property itself. That is the issue before the Planning Board. Jewell is not asking the Board to preserve "free Library parking," to "occupy the Library's property," or to "usurp" a public benefit. Rather,Jewell asks only that the Planning Board require a redevelopment that adequately addresses the Library's own parking needs on its own site and does not continue to externalize the consequences of an inadequate parking supply by making them the burden of adjoining property owners and the Southold commercial district. The repeated assertions in several letters of support fundamentally invert that issue by attributing improper motives to neighboring property owners instead of addressing the actual planning problem presented by the application. Adding insult to injury the proposed redevelopment actually prevents Jewell from access to the parking spots on its property in the rear of the building. Several recently submitted letters extend beyond expressions of support for the Library and instead purport to describe the objections raised by Jewell and other adjoining property owners. In doing so, a number of those letters repeatedly characterize Jewell's position in substantially similar terms that do not accurately reflect the issues presented in Jewell's submissions to this Board. For example, several letters assert that the project was effectively ready for approval until two neighboring business owners objected because they would lose "free access to library parking" following the relocation of employee parking from Main Road to Traveler Street. Others state that neighboring landowners seek to "usurp this public benefit for their own personal use and profits," claim that neighboring owners seek to "occupy the Library's property for personal use to enhance their profits," express that the writers are "shocked they have been allowed to get away with this," or urge the Board to reject what are described as "frivolous and unjustified objections." Similar themes appear repeatedly in the letters submitted by Gail LaForce, Susan Honig,Peter Honig, Maureen Ringold, Margaret Vaden, and others. The effect of these repeated assertions is to malign neighboring property owners by portraying their documented planning concerns as nothing more than an effort to advance private profit or appropriate a public benefit. Jewell has consistently raised concerns regarding the physical consequences of the proposed redevelopment, including whether the proposed site design would materially impair practical access to parking located on the Jewell property, alter longstanding circulation patterns serving adjoining commercial properties, interfere with loading, deliveries, service access, emergency access, and vehicle maneuvering, and adversely affect the continued practical operation of neighboring properties. Jewell has also identified historical circulation patterns,prior Planning Board approvals, and existing access arrangements reflected in the record that, in its view, warrant careful consideration by the Board. Whether the Board ultimately agrees with those concerns is properly a matter for its determination. They should not, however, be reduced to the repeated assertion that Jewell merely seeks to preserve "free access to library parking" or private economic advantage. 2 The planning process depends upon robust public participation,but it also depends upon civil discourse. Citizens should feel free to support or oppose an application without questioning the motives or integrity of those who hold a different view. Characterizing neighboring property owners as seeking to "usurp" a public benefit, occupy Library property for profit, or advance "frivolous and unjustified objections" does not address the planning issues presented by the application. Rather, those statements unnecessarily malign neighboring property owners and divert attention from the substantive issues the Planning Board is charged with deciding. That these recurring mischaracterizations appear in letters submitted by members of the Library's Board of Trustees is particularly concerning. Trustees owe fiduciary duties to the applicant and their public statements concerning the application may reasonably be understood as reflecting the applicant's own characterization of the issues before the Board. When fiduciaries of the applicant repeat or endorse factual assertions that materially mischaracterize an adjoining property owner's position and unnecessarily malign that property owner's motives, they risk distorting the administrative record and diverting attention from the actual planning issues the Board is charged with deciding. Several of the recently submitted letters illustrate a recurring narrative concerning Jewell's position that is not reflected in the administrative record. For example, Gail LaForce urges the Board not to permit "the desires of neighboring landowners to usurp this public benefit for their own personal use and profits." Library Trustee Susan Honig asserts that neighboring property owners "claim they should be able to occupy the Library's property for personal use to enhance their profits" and states that she is "shocked they have been allowed to get away with this."Library Trustee Peter Honig similarly characterizes Jewell's submissions as "frivolous and unjustified objections." Other letters repeat the assertion that Jewell merely seeks to preserve "free access to library parking." These statements do not fairly characterize the issues presented by Jewell,whose submissions concern whether the proposed site plan would materially impair practical access to parking located on the Jewell property itself, alter longstanding circulation patterns, and adversely affect access, loading, service, emergency vehicle movements, and the continued practical operation of adjoining properties. Rather than addressing those planning issues,the quoted statements attribute improper motives to adjoining property owners and unnecessarily malign them. The repetition of these same factual characterizations,particularly by members of the Library's Board of Trustees,who are fiduciaries of the applicant, is especially concerning because such statements may reasonably be understood as reflecting the applicant's own characterization of the issues before the Board. The striking similarity among a number of these letters raises a legitimate question regarding the source of the recurring factual assertions concerning Jewell's position. Jewell does not suggest that residents should be discouraged from expressing their own views or support for the project. However, if these recurring characterizations originated from information, summaries, descriptions, or suggested language supplied by the applicant, its fiduciaries, consultants, or representatives, 3 fundamental fairness and the integrity of the administrative record warrant disclosure of those materials and their inclusion in the record before the Board. Transparency concerning the origin of factual assertions repeatedly advanced in public comments permits the Board—and, if necessary, a reviewing court—to evaluate those comments in their proper context. Several letters further suggest that the public benefits of the proposed project should outweigh the concerns of neighboring businesses. Respectfully, that is not the legal standard governing the Board's review. The Southold Free Library unquestionably serves an important public purpose. So too do Southold's longstanding Main Street businesses. Those businesses employ and serve local residents,preserve the historic commercial character of the hamlet,provide goods and services relied upon by the community, contribute to its economic vitality, support local civic and charitable organizations, and generate tax revenues that help fund municipal services and public institutions, including the Library itself. Their concerns are not rendered less legitimate because they arise from privately owned businesses. The Planning Board is not charged with choosing between a worthy public institution and neighboring businesses. Rather, it is charged with determining whether this particular site plan complies with the Town Code and whether its physical design appropriately addresses access, circulation,parking functionality,public safety, compatibility with adjoining properties, and the continued reasonable use of neighboring lands. Those issues should be decided upon the plans, engineering submissions,historical records, agency comments, and the remainder of the administrative record—not upon repeated characterizations of the motives or intentions of adjoining property owners. Jewell does not request that the Board disregard the letters of support. Those letters appropriately reflect community sentiment regarding the Library and the proposed project. Jewell respectfully requests only that the Board distinguish between expressions of public support and factual assertions concerning the nature of Jewell's objections, evaluate those assertions against the actual record before it, and, if the recurring factual characterizations originated from information supplied by the applicant or its representatives, include the source of those characterizations in the administrative record as well. Thank you for your consideration of this submission. Respectfully submitted, Joan H. Bischoff Van Heemskerck Attorney for Jewell on Main, LLC 4 s "b� P8 u a t:Il Nicholas J.Planamento,Member . Jewell on Main,LLC FOWN OIL)i�HOLD rPLANWNG 1 JUL 53795 Main Road,Southold NY 11971 50Ar10 631-948-0143 July 21,2026 Chairman James H.Rich Ili and Members Town of Southold Planning Board P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 z i 15,. bear Chairman Rich and Members of the Planning Board:. Thank you for reviewing this application and forthe opportunity to offer this final comment before the Board makes their determination. i support green space and a thoughtfully designed pocket park that enhances Southold's hamlet center.My objection is not to the Library or the concept of a park.It is to approvingthis particular merger and redevelopment plan before the adequacy of its SEQRA classification,parking,emergency access,and neighboring property rights have been properly resolved. For the following reasons,I respectfully request denial of the application in its present farm; • The Type ll SEQRA classification appears questionable:The action is not limited to a small nonresidential structure measured by gross floor area.it includes a new outdoor recreational and entertainment facility seating approximately 100 people,substantial earthwork and imported fill,parking and access changes,and potential impacts involving traffic,noise,drainage,erosion,neighborhood character,and intensity of use.These issues ordinarily warrant evaluation through an Unlisted-action review and determination of significance.At minimum, the Board should explain in writing whythe entire action—not meretythe square footage of its constructed features--qualifies under 6 NYCRR§617.5(c)(9). * Parking has not been demonstrated: The record does not appearto contain a comprehensive analysis of current and projected parking demand forthe Library's nearly 20 full-and part-time employees,trustees, volunteers,patrons,deliveries,accessible spaces,and simultaneous indoor and outdoor programs.The amphitheater and activity areas are specifically intended to bring more people downtown,making an objective peak-demand analysis essential. • The 19139 parking relief no longer reflects present conditions: The 1989 ZBA and Planning Board determination granting relief from applicable off-street parking requirements was reportedly based,at least in part,upon the Library being permitted to use parking at Feather Hill.Feather Hill has advised that this parking is no longer available. Additionally,the Town of Southold owned Municipal lot,opposite the Main Road entry of the Library,is limited to under20 parking spaces;there are an additional 14 spaces controlled by the Southold Park District;34 spaces does not satisfy the dairy parking needs of the hamlet of Southold and should not be relied upon to service the use by the Southold Free Library to satisfy its on site parking requirements. This illustrates the law of unintended consequences:prior relief granted in reliance upon neighboring property now contributes to a present-day parking deficiency.The Library should demonstrate that it can meet its parking needs on property it owns. Neighboring property and access rights remain unresolved: Existing rights-of-way and access to rear parking areas Must be clearly identified and protected.In addition,there is an unresolved lot-line dispute between the Library and adjoining owner Jewett on Main LLC',The Board should not approve a merger or site plan that assumes a disputed boundary,impairs established access,or depends upon land whose ownership or location has not been conclusively determined. Furthermore,how can the applicant seek approval fora curb cutfrom the NYS DOT on land owned byJeweil on Main,LLC? • Substantial grading and imported flit have net been adequately analyzed: Construction of the outdoor amphitheater appears to require significant ground disturbance and imported fill.The record does not appear to quantify that fill or adequately address truck traffic,staging,drainage,soil stability,retaining walls,construction impacts,and possible effects upon adjoining properties, • Emergency access remains a serious concern: The file contains responses from reviewing authorities, including a statement of no objection from the Southold Fire Department among others.Nevertheless,the plan does not appear to demonstrate that fire apparatus and other emergency vehicles can enter,maneuver,operate, and exit through either proposed access points at Main Road or Traveler Street,A general no-objection response should not substitute for a turning-radius or swept-path analysis based upon the actual dimensions of emergency vehicles. • The Project cannot be considered in a vacuum: The Library and surrounding parcels(previously owned by the library)have been affected by multiple Planning Board and Zoning Board determinations,starting in the 1980's concerning the building,setbacks,parking,access,and rights-of-way.The proposed merger changes how those prior approvals operate orwere intended to operate.The Board should consider that complete land-use history rather than treating the merger and individual improvements as isolated actions,especially since this is an amended parking site plan review. Southold's population and use of the hamlet center have grown since the Library's 1989 expansion,with additional year- round and seasonal pressures arising during and after the COVID-1 9 period.Present-day parking and operational needs should therefore be evaluated using current staffing,programming,patronage,and peak attendance—not assumptions made years ago. The form letters submitted in support of the project demonstrate understandable enthusiasm for green space,increased library programming,and increased downtown activity.They do not,however,resolve the technical questions involving SEQRA,parking,access,boundaries,emergency response,grading,or neighboring property rights.Indeed,the stated goat of attracting more people downtown strengthens the need to address those matters before approval. A proper SEQRA review would have provided an organized Process for evaluating these interrelated impacts and identifying reasonable alternatives.That review might have resulted in a better plan preserving green space white providing adequate on-site parking,safe emergency access,and meaningful protection for adjoining properties. I therefore respectfully request denial of the proposed lot merger and amended parking site plan in their present form. Denial would not end the prospect of a park.It would permit the applicant to develop a more balanced proposal that enhances the Library and Southold's hamlet centerwithout shifting parking,access,safety,or operational burdens onto neighboring ovyners and the community. Thank you for your service to the Town and your careful consideration of these concerns. Ras Uysubmitted, . .......... Ni as Planamento Me r,Jewett on Main,LLC 53795 Main Road Southold,New York 1IIuW Joan@j*'tDisc"nofflaw.com B 0 I S C�h o ipip aw t�, (631) 948-02,34 llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllYl oill��lll�������illooi o00 0000 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIII IIIIIIII P L',L Southold, NY 1!1971 Southold, July 22, 2026 TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD In the Matter of the Application of the Southold Free Library Parking Amended Site Plan REPLY MEMORANDUM OF JEWELL ON MAIN LLC Chairperson and Members of the Planning Board: Jewell on Main, LLC respectfully submits this reply memorandum to address the Memorandum of Law submitted on behalf of the Southold Free Library. Jewell submits this reply so that the factual and legal issues implicated by the proposed redevelopment are fully presented before any final determination is made. On the present record, the applicant has not demonstrated compliance with the standards governing site-plan approval, and Jewell therefore requests denial of the application. That requested denial does not require the Board to adjudicate title, easement scope, abandonment, prescription, or any other disputed private right. It requires only that the Board evaluate the project actually proposed, the existing physical and municipal record, and the applicant's failure to establish that the proposed design provides adequate parking, safe circulation, emergency access, sound engineering, compatibility with adjoining property, and appropriate consideration of less disruptive alternatives. I. STATEMENT OF FACTS The application presently before the Planning Board concerns substantially more than the creation of a small public garden. It involves the merger and redevelopment redevelopment of property that has evolved over many decades through successive conveyances, subdivisions, municipal approvals, demolitions, and changing patterns of use. Understanding that history is essential to evaluating the planning issues presented by the current application. On February 12, 2025, the Library presented Jewell with substantially the same redevelopment concept that is now before the Planning Board. From that first meeting forward, Jewell consistently identified concerns regarding the removal of parking, disruption of longstanding circulation, practical vehicular access to the rear of the Jewell Property, future lawful use and redevelopment of the Jewell Property, and feasible alternative layouts that could accomplish the Library's objectives with substantially fewer impacts. During the ensuing months, Jewell repeatedly raised those concerns and proposed preservation of existing circulation, relocation of improvements, use of the Library's expanded Main Road and Traveler Street frontage, and redesign of the project footprint. The plans presently before the Board nevertheless remain materially the same as those originally presented in February 2025. None of the material design accommodations requested by Jewell including preservation of existing circulation patterns, modification of the project layout, relocation of improvements, or redesign to minimize impacts upon adjoining properties has been incorporated into the application. No materially revised design addressing those concerns has been presented to Jewell. Accordingly, any suggestion that the current design reflects negotiated accommodations made in response to Jewell's concerns is not supported by the record. The plans before the Board are, in all material respects, the same plans initially presented more than a year ago. A. The Historical Development of the Properties Jewell on Main, LLC ("Jewell") owns the commercial property located at 53795 Main Road, and 53801 Main Road(collectively, the "Jewell Property"). Constructed in the late nineteenth century, the Jewell Property has long functioned as part of the traditional commercial center of the Hamlet of Southold. Vehicular access, parking, loading, deliveries, and customer and residential circulation have historically depended upon the driveway between the Jewell Property and its westerly neighbor and upon interconnected parking and circulation areas located immediately behind the buildings. The neighboring property now owned by the Southold Free Library (the "Library") likewise evolved over many decades through successive acquisitions and changes in use. At various times those properties contained, among other improvements, the former post office building, an Italian restaurant, and residences on and behind the commercial buildings on Main Road. These buildings historically defined the circulation and access patterns behind the Main Road frontage. B. Subsequent Subdivision and Property Acquisitions After the original development of the area, the surrounding lands were subdivided into separate parcels, including parcels fronting on Main Road and Traveler Street. Over time, the Library acquired the adjoining parcel, including the parcel immediately west of Jewell's property extending toward Traveler Street and later effected a subdivision creating a lot to be sold off(the North Fork Woodworking building). Following those acquisitions, the Library demolished both the former post office building immediately west of Jewell and the residence located to the north. As a result of those demolitions, the Library now possesses direct frontage and access from Main Road, as well as substantial frontage and vehicular access from Traveler Street. 2 The removal of those buildings significantly altered the physical relationship among the adjoining parcels and substantially increased the Library's flexibility in planning future redevelopment of its property. C. Longstanding Parking and Vehicular Circulation Beginning with the nineteenth-century development of the Main Road commercial district and continuing through later subdivision and redevelopment, access to the parking areas and buildings located behind the Main Road frontage was provided through a narrow shared access corridor, approximately fifteen(15) feet in practical width, located along the common boundary between the Jewell Property and the adjoining Library parcel and extending northward from Main Road toward Traveler Street. That corridor functioned as part of an integrated network of recorded rights-of-way, shared parking areas, and interconnected vehicular circulation serving multiple adjoining properties. The recorded instruments affecting the Jewell Property and the adjoining parcel now owned by the Library document reciprocal access strips along the common boundary. The applicant presently characterizes those recorded strips as approximately four and one-half feet on each parcel, together forming an approximately nine-foot recorded driveway. The practical traveled way and maneuvering area, however, historically extended beyond the mathematical width of those strips and operated as the approximately fifteen-foot shared access used to reach rear parking, buildings, loading and service areas, and the lands extending toward Traveler Street. The adjoining paved and gravel areas also were historically used as part of an interconnected parking and circulation environment that provided practical benefits to both properties. Rather than serving a single parcel in isolation, the shared access and adjoining paved and gravel areas historically accommodated ingress and egress, customer and employee parking, deliveries, loading, service vehicles, turning, maneuvering, and circulation among the commercial properties behind the Main Road buildings. The resulting pattern reflected the physical realities of the historic block: limited frontage, closely spaced structures, and rear commercial areas whose practical operation historically depended substantially upon coordinated use of access, rights-of-way, parking, and maneuvering space. The shared corridor and rear circulation areas serve not only customer and commercial activity at 53795 Main Road, but also rear building entrances, residential premises, occupants and tenants, deliveries, service providers, refuse operations, and emergency response. The practical effect of narrowing or obstructing that access therefore extends beyond convenience or parking capacity and may affect the continued operation of both the commercial and residential components of the Jewell Property. The deeds and recorded instruments should be considered for what they objectively document: the existence of an established access framework affecting the adjoining parcels. Jewell does not ask the Planning Board to determine the present ownership, scope, enforceability, abandonment, 3 merger, extinguishment, or legal effect of those rights. Those issues, if disputed, remain for a court of competent jurisdiction. The physical use of the area, however, was not confined in practice to the precise width of the recorded strips. Vehicles using the rear parking and commercial areas necessarily required additional space for turning, maneuvering, loading, entering parking spaces, and exiting the site. The adjoining paved and gravel areas therefore functioned over time as part of an interconnected parking and circulation system, even though the ultimate legal status of every portion of that larger maneuvering area has not been determined. This historical arrangement is relevant to site plan review because the proposed redevelopment would install permanent improvements within and immediately adjacent to the area through which the historic access and circulation system has operated. The existing physical environment surrounding the application is itself a significant planning fact. The area does not consist of independent parking fields or isolated commercial parcels. Rather, the rear of the Main Road commercial frontage has historically functioned as an integrated parking, circulation, loading, delivery, and access environment serving multiple adjoining commercial properties through shared maneuvering areas, reciprocal rights-of-way, and common travel corridors. The applicant's own historical submissions, including the survey submitted and endorsed in connection with the 2013 lot-line modification, document physical conditions including a gravel parking area straddling the parcel boundary that reflect this integrated operational environment. Those existing conditions constitute the baseline against which the impacts of the proposed redevelopment must be evaluated. The submission should specifically depict and evaluate the existing curb opening and driveway connection on Main Road/NYS Route 25, including the approximately 16.05-foot frontage condition shown on the topographic survey. It should identify the State right-of-way line, the legally authorized curb-opening width and location, property lines, recorded access areas, pavement limits, internal driveway width, driveway grades, drainage, sight-distance triangles, vehicle-storage distance beyond the sidewalk, and the complete path of passenger, commercial, refuse, service, maintenance, and emergency vehicles from the rear circulation area through the curb opening. The analysis should demonstrate that entering vehicles can leave Route 25 and clear the public sidewalk promptly; that exiting vehicles can approach the sidewalk and highway in a controlled forward movement; that vehicles will not stop, queue, or reverse across the sidewalk; and that internal narrowing, fencing, walls, landscaping, parking, gates, or other improvements will not impair the safe and practical operation of the State-highway connection serving the Jewell Property. D. The Application Does Not Adequately Address the Route 25 Curb Cut, NYSDOT Jurisdiction, or the Heavily Traveled Sidewalk Crossing 4 The shared access reaches Main Road/NYS Route 25 through the existing curb opening and driveway apron located immediately adjacent to the Jewell Property. The topographic survey depicts an access width of approximately 16.05 feet at the Main Road frontage, corresponding generally to the practical shared or interconnected access corridor leading from Route 25 into the rear parking and circulation areas. The curb opening is therefore not merely an isolated Library driveway. It is the Route 25 connection through which vehicles reach parking, rear entrances, commercial operations, deliveries, service areas, refuse operations, emergency access, and the second-floor residential premises associated with the Jewell Property. The driveway served by that curb opening is not located wholly upon or owned solely by the Library. Jewell owns the easterly portion of the driveway and access area through which the curb cut serves the Jewell Property. The Route 25 connection therefore leads into an access facility composed in part of land owned by Jewell and used to reach Jewell's rear parking, commercial premises, residential premises, entrances, deliveries, service operations, refuse collection, and emergency access. This divided ownership is material to the pending application. The Library has submitted plans and sought governmental review affecting the width, configuration, continuation, safety, and operation of the curb-cut and driveway system without identifying Jewell as an owner of part of the affected driveway or including Jewell as a co-applicant, consenting owner, or participating affected property owner concerning that portion of the access. The application should not depict or characterize the full access as though it were located entirely upon and controlled exclusively by the Library. The application does not establish the legally authorized width, location, or configuration of the Route 25 curb opening. Nor does it establish whether NYSDOT regards the existing opening as one access serving an interconnected circulation environment, as separate or overlapping access points, or as an existing access whose continued operation depends upon the complete internal driveway configuration behind the State right-of-way. This omission is especially significant because the Planning Board itself referred the application to NYSDOT by letter dated April 27, 2026 and requested comments, requirements, identification of relevant issues, and clarification of NYSDOT jurisdiction. The present administrative record made available to Jewell does not appear to contain a substantive NYSDOT response, a Highway Work Permit, an approval of the existing or proposed access configuration, or a written determination that no NYSDOT permit or further review is required. The absence of any proposed physical relocation of the curb line would not eliminate the issue. The operational safety of a State-highway access depends upon the full functional driveway extending behind the curb opening. Proposed fencing, gates, walls, landscaping, grading, parking, pedestrian improvements, and other fixed features may narrow or channelize the internal continuation of the driveway even if the curb opening at the highway line remains physically unchanged. 5 An unchanged curb opening may become operationally unsafe if vehicles cannot clear the traveled roadway and sidewalk promptly, pass where necessary, queue entirely within the site, enter or leave retained parking spaces, accommodate delivery or emergency vehicles, turn before exiting, or maintain adequate sight distance. If the internal driveway is narrowed or obstructed, entering vehicles may stop across the public sidewalk or remain partially exposed to Route 25 traffic, while exiting vehicles may be forced to undertake backing or multi-point movements near or across the sidewalk and State highway. The application also fails to evaluate the separate and substantial pedestrian conflict at the driveway apron. Every vehicle entering or leaving the shared access must cross the public sidewalk on the north side of Main Road. That sidewalk is a heavily traveled pedestrian route connecting Feather Hill, the nearby bus stop, the pharmacy, the Library, and other shops, services, and public destinations in Southold's commercial center. Pedestrians include shoppers, transit passengers, employees, Library patrons, older persons, families, and children. Drivers using the access must divide their attention among pedestrians approaching from both sidewalk directions, limited gaps in Route 25 traffic, vehicles and trucks on the highway, parked and maneuvering vehicles within the site, and any fencing, walls, gates, landscaping, signs, or structures affecting visibility. Those conflicts become more serious if constrained internal circulation causes vehicles to queue across the sidewalk, stop before fully entering the site, or reverse toward the pedestrian crossing and Route 25. Before approval, the applicant should be required to provide a dimensioned Route 25 access and sidewalk-crossing analysis prepared by a qualified traffic or transportation professional and submitted to NYSDOT for review. The analysis should address the authorized and proposed curb-opening width and location, State right-of-way line, property lines, recorded access areas, pavement limits, internal driveway width, vehicle storage, sight-distance triangles, driveway grades, drainage, pedestrian approach routes, vehicle turning and swept paths, queuing, backing movements, and the ability of vehicles to clear the sidewalk and traveled roadway promptly. The Board should not grant final approval until the administrative record contains a written NYSDOT determination identifying the extent of its jurisdiction and either: (1) any required Highway Work Permit, driveway/access approval, or conditions; or(2) an express written determination that no such permit or approval is required. Any NYSDOT review should be based upon plans accurately depicting the adjoining Jewell Property, the historic and existing shared- access and circulation conditions, the proposed internal narrowing or obstruction, and the functional consequences for both properties. E. Later Acquisitions and Demolitions Altered the Library's Access Options but Did Not Erase the Historic Circulation Pattern The historic access arrangement developed when buildings on the adjoining parcels constrained direct access to the rear portions of the properties. The parcel now proposed for redevelopment formerly contained commercial and residential improvements, including the former post office or 6 restaurant building near Main Road and a residence or other improvements extending toward Traveler Street. Over time, the Library acquired additional adjoining parcels and demolished the structures that had previously limited access through its own property but sold off one parcel on traveler Street. As a result, the Library now possesses direct frontage and potential vehicular access from both Main Road and Traveler Street, providing substantially greater flexibility than existed when the historic access arrangement developed. Those later acquisitions and demolitions changed the Library's physical options. They did not, however, eliminate the documented history of shared access, parking, and circulation along the Jewell boundary. Nor do they establish, without legal and factual analysis, that the historic access framework may simply be disregarded in the review of the present application. The current proposal is significant because, rather than using the Library's expanded frontage and access options to preserve or improve the longstanding circulation system, it would install permanent gathering-space improvements, fencing, landscaping, walls, and related structures within or immediately adjoining the area historically used for access and maneuvering. F. The Prior Municipal Record Confirms That Earlier Approvals Relied Upon Existing Parking, Off-Site Parking Resources, and the Historic Circulation Pattern The Town's own planning records confirm that the Planning Board's earlier review of the Library property occurred against the backdrop of the historical parking and circulation conditions described above. During the Library's 1989 application, the Planning Board did not determine that the parking depicted on the proposed site plan was independently sufficient. Rather, the Planning Board's recommendation dated July 13, 1989 expressly recognized that the parking shown on the plan was insufficient and identified several existing conditions that informed its review, including the availability of municipal parking across Main Road, the Library's written authorization to use the adjoining Feather Hill parking lot, the availability of Library-owned land for future code- compliant parking, and the proposed construction of a turnaround at the end of the existing parking area. The written Feather Hill parking arrangement was not merely an informal understanding. By letter dated June 20, 1989, Library counsel Rudolph Bruer transmitted to the Planning Board written confirmation from the owner of Feather Hill authorizing Library patrons to use that adjoining parking area. The availability of that off-site parking resource therefore formed part of the documentary record considered during the Library's prior approval process. The integrated parking and circulation conditions reflected in the earlier approvals remained evident during the Library's 2013 resubdivision proceedings. In describing that application, the Planning Department stated that approximately 4,491 square feet would be conveyed to the 7 Library parcel to provide additional access from Traveler Street to the Library's existing parking lot. The Planning Board thereafter approved the resubdivision and endorsed the survey submitted as part of that application. Significantly, the survey submitted to and endorsed by the Planning Board in connection with the 2013 lot-line modification depicts an existing gravel parking area extending across and straddling the boundary between the Jewell Property and the newly configured Library parcel. It does not depict two self-contained parking facilities divided neatly at the adjusted lot line. At the same time the Town approved the transfer of approximately 4,491 square feet to provide the Library additional access from Traveler Street to its existing parking lot, the survey submitted in connection with and endorsed as part of that proceeding depicted a physically integrated parking and circulation condition extending across both parcels. The survey is not offered as an adjudication of ownership or as a substitute for judicial determination of the legal scope of any private right. It is contemporaneous, objective evidence of the actual physical condition presented to and endorsed by the Town in 2013. It therefore directly contradicts any suggestion that the parcels historically functioned as wholly separate parking and circulation facilities or that the present proposal concerns vacant, isolated, or functionally unused land. Jewell does not contend that the 2013 survey determines the ownership, legal status, or enforceability of any easement or parking right, nor does it request that the Planning Board resolve any private property dispute. The survey is relevant because it objectively documents the physical conditions recognized during the Town's own approval process, including the existence of an integrated parking and circulation environment immediately adjacent to the Jewell Property. These historical municipal records are directly relevant to the present application. The Library now proposes to remove or materially reconfigure portions of that same parking and circulation area and replace them with permanent landscaping, pathways, gathering facilities, fencing, retaining walls, and related site improvements. Accordingly, the Board should evaluate the current proposal in light of the documented parking and circulation conditions reflected in its own prior proceedings rather than treating the site as though the proposed redevelopment affects only vacant or functionally isolated land. G. The Parking Circumstances Reflected in the Earlier Approvals Have Materially Changed The parking circumstances reflected in the earlier municipal record have materially changed. The Feather Hill parking resource considered during the Library's 1989 proceedings is no longer available. By letter dated July 21, 2026, the current owner of Feather Hill expressly withdrew and revoked, effective immediately, any prior permission whether oral, written, implied, tolerated, or otherwise that may previously have permitted Library employees, patrons, invitees, contractors, or program attendees to park on Feather Hill property. The owner further directed that Feather Hill parking not be treated as available, dedicated, overflow, substitute, or alternative parking for the Library. 8 Accordingly, whatever permission may have existed in 1989 has now been expressly terminated. The Planning Board may not rationally count, rely upon, or treat Feather Hill parking as presently available parking for the Library unless the applicant produces a current enforceable right or agreement establishing otherwise. Parking adequacy must be evaluated on the basis of parking lawfully located on property owned or controlled by the Library or otherwise presently available to it through a valid and enforceable right or agreement. The Library's own Board minutes and contemporaneous records also reflect its awareness of parking concerns and difficulties involving the use or availability of neighboring private parking. Those records should be identified by date and included in the administrative record because they bear directly upon whether the factual parking assumptions underlying the earlier municipal review remain valid. At the same time, the current application proposes to create a publicly programmed open-space and gathering facility intended to accommodate additional public activity while eliminating or materially reducing an existing parking and circulation resource. The present proposal therefore differs materially from the circumstances reflected in the earlier record: the Feather Hill parking resource is no longer available, established parking is proposed to be removed or materially reduced, and the intensity of outdoor public use is expected to increase. H. Planning Staff Has Characterized the Application as a Lot Merger and Amended Site Plan Subject to Limited Review Nicholas Planamento, a principal of Jewell on Main, LLC, met with Brian Cummings, Senior Planner for the Town of Southold, concerning the scope of the pending application and the issues raised by Jewell. During that meeting, Mr. Cummings stated, in substance, that the application was being treated as a lot-merger application and as an amendment to an existing site plan; that the proposed pocket park did not constitute redevelopment requiring broader Planning Board scrutiny because the principal Library structure was not being changed; and that no new parking review was required because there was no enlargement of the existing Library building. Mr. Cummings further stated, in substance, that SEQRA did not apply because the proposal involved no change exceeding approximately 4,000 square feet in the existing Library building. No particular statutory provision, regulation, Town Code section, prior approving resolution, or written SEQRA classification was identified to Mr. Planamento as the basis for those statements. The present record does not identify the particular subdivision of 6 NYCRR 617.5 upon which any Type II classification is based or explain how that regulatory provision applies to the coordinated site redevelopment proposed here, including demolition, grading, retaining-wall work, drainage improvements, utilities, lighting, elimination or reconfiguration of parking and circulation areas, and creation of a publicly programmed gathering facility. 9 It remains unclear which prior site plan is alleged to be amended. The apparent reference may be to the plan associated with the 2013 resubdivision, but the applicant's submissions do not clearly identify the original approved site plan, the resolution approving it, its material conditions, the specific amendments now sought, or the basis upon which earlier findings are considered applicable to the present redevelopment. Jewell includes these facts not to personalize or criticize the Planning Department's review, but because the stated characterization appears to affect the scope of review being afforded to the application. Jewell respectfully submits that the Board should identify on the record the prior site plan allegedly being amended, the legal standards applicable to that amendment, the scope of the Board's parking and site-plan review, and the regulatory basis for any Type II classification under SEQRA. I. The Planning Board Referred the Route 25 Access Issue to NYSDOT, but the Present Record Does Not Contain a Substantive Agency Determination By letter dated April 27, 2026, the Planning Board referred the proposed Library site plan to the New York State Department of Transportation because the project fronts upon Main Road, also designated New York State Route 25. The Board requested NYSDOT's comments and requirements, identification of issues that should be evaluated, and clarification of the Department's jurisdiction over the proposed project. The referral also appears incomplete because the access under review is not located wholly upon Library property. Jewell owns part of the driveway served by the Route 25 curb opening, and that driveway provides the only presently practical Main Road vehicular access to Jewell's rear parking and premises. Nevertheless, the referral does not appear to identify Jewell as an affected property owner or advise NYSDOT that the curb opening serves a driveway composed in part of land owned by Jewell. Nor does the referral appear to advise NYSDOT that the proposed improvements including fencing, landscaping, walls, altered parking, narrowed circulation, and the possible withdrawal of the approximately 4V2-foot area depicted on the plans may affect Jewell's continued use of the curb cut and driveway. Any agency review conducted without those material facts would not address the complete existing access condition or the operational consequences of the proposal for both affected properties. That referral confirms that the Route 25 frontage, curb opening, driveway connection, drainage, pedestrian facilities, and associated access conditions cannot be treated solely as matters within Town jurisdiction. The present record, however, does not appear to contain a substantive NYSDOT response, a Highway Work Permit, approval of the existing or proposed driveway configuration, a written determination that no permit is required, or agency comments addressing driveway width, sight distance, drainage, pedestrian safety, vehicle movements, or the effect of the proposed redevelopment upon the existing Route 25 access. 10 Before final action, the Board should obtain and place in the administrative record NYSDOT's written determination concerning the extent of its jurisdiction, whether any Highway Work Permit or commercial driveway/access approval is required, and whether the complete existing and proposed access configuration is acceptable from the standpoint of highway and pedestrian safety. Before the Board relies upon any NYSDOT response, it should confirm that NYSDOT was provided an accurate survey and existing-conditions plan identifying the ownership of the driveway, the portion owned by Jewell, the recorded access instruments, the present operational use of the curb cut by both properties, and every proposed improvement that may affect the width or practical operation of that access. Jewell should receive copies of the material submitted to NYSDOT and the agency's response and should be afforded a meaningful opportunity to comment before final action. J. The Current Application The application before the Board seeks approval for the redevelopment of a substantial portion of the Library's property into a publicly accessible open-space and gathering area. Although frequently described as a "pocket park," the proposal includes numerous permanent improvements, including, among other things: demolition of existing improvements; • removal of substantial parking areas; • grading; • drainage improvements; • retaining walls; • pedestrian walkways; • amphitheater-style seating; • landscaping; • fencing; • lighting; • utilities; • accessory structures; and • permanent changes to vehicular circulation. The proposal would also permanently occupy an area that has historically functioned as part of the circulation system serving the Jewell Property. K. The July 13, 2026 Public Hearing At the public hearing conducted on July 13, 2026, Jewell, through its representative, advised the Planning Board that its concerns did not relate to the creation of public open space itself. Rather, Jewell explained that the proposed site plan, as designed, would permanently occupy an area that has been visibly and consistently used for decades as part of the established vehicular access and circulation serving the Jewell Property. Jewell further explained that the Board was not being asked to determine whether those longstanding uses had matured into legal rights. Instead, Jewell respectfully advised the Board that approving permanent improvements before those rights are determined could effectively eliminate or substantially impair rights that may exist under recorded instruments or other legal or equitable doctrines. 11 Jewell also advised the Board that the issue extends beyond present-day parking arrangements. The continued lawful use, occupancy, adaptive reuse, and legally available future use of the Jewell Property under applicable zoning and existing municipal approvals depend upon maintaining practical vehicular access to the parking serving that property. Accordingly, impairment of that access presents not merely a private property issue, but a legitimate land-use and planning consideration directly relevant to the Board's review. L. Statements by the Applicant's Counsel During the July 13, 2026 public hearing, counsel for the Library characterized the approximately 41/2-foot-wide area depicted on the plans as a revocable "license" and suggested that its continued availability could depend upon whether litigation was pursued. Following the hearing, Library counsel further advised Jewell, in substance, that the Library could withdraw or eliminate the depicted 41/2-foot area and would take a"hardball"position in its dealings with Jewell. Jewell disputes the factual and legal premises of those statements. More importantly for present planning purposes, those statements create a fundamental uncertainty concerning the plan actually before the Board. The approximately 41/2-foot strip is presently shown as part of the proposed configuration and appears to be relied upon in depicting the width, access, circulation, separation, and functionality of the completed site. If the Library does not intend to maintain that area as depicted, the plans before the Board do not accurately represent the project the Library intends to construct and operate. The Library cannot obtain approval based upon a plan depicting the 41/2-foot area as available while simultaneously reserving the unilateral right to withdraw, obstruct, fence off, eliminate, or materially restrict that area after approval. Removal or restriction of the depicted strip may materially affect the width and practical operation of the access corridor, access to Jewell's parking, passenger- and commercial-vehicle turning, gate and fence alignment, emergency access, pedestrian safety, and the adequacy of the overall circulation system. Before final action, the applicant should therefore be required to state unequivocally whether the approximately 41/2-foot area will remain continuously available in the location, dimensions, and configuration depicted on the plans. If the Library intends to withdraw, eliminate, relocate, fence, gate, obstruct, narrow, or otherwise restrict that area, the applicant should submit revised plans depicting the proposed final condition and all resulting effects upon parking, access, circulation, turning movements, pedestrian safety, emergency access, fencing, landscaping, and adjoining properties. Any such change would constitute a material revision to the site plan and should be returned to the Planning Board for complete review, including revised engineering and circulation analyses, appropriate agency review, and renewed opportunity for public comment. The issue should not be deferred until after approval or left to unilateral action by the applicant. 12 M. The Issues Before the Planning Board Jewell repeats that the Planning Board is not being asked to determine title, ownership, easement rights, abandonment, prescriptive rights, or other private legal claims. Those matters, if judicial determination becomes necessary, belong before the Supreme Court. The issues presently before the Board are different. The Board must determine whether the proposed redevelopment has been sufficiently designed, documented, and analyzed to ensure that it: provides adequate parking and circulation; safely accommodates vehicular and pedestrian movement; minimizes unnecessary impacts upon adjoining property; accurately reflects existing physical conditions; appropriately considers feasible alternatives; preserves the future lawful use of neighboring properties to the extent reasonably possible; and otherwise satisfies the standards governing site plan approval. It is those planning issues and not the ultimate determination of private property rights that form the subject of the remainder of this memorandum. II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Jewell on Main, LLC respectfully submits that the present record is insufficient to support final site plan approval. The existing submissions do not adequately disclose or analyze the proposal's net effect upon parking, vehicular circulation, delivery and service access, pedestrian safety, grading, retaining walls, drainage, adjoining properties, or the practical operation of the completed site. The record also does not sufficiently identify the applicable baseline established by prior Planning Board and Zoning Board approvals or evaluate whether the project's objectives reasonably could be achieved through a less impactful site layout. The application further fails to provide sufficient information concerning the existing conditions and operational relationship of the surrounding commercial properties, thereby preventing the Board from evaluating the proj ect's off-site impacts and making the findings required for site plan approval. The present record also does not establish that the coordinated redevelopment qualifies as a Type II action under SEQRA. The Planning Department has not identified the particular provision of 6 NYCRR 617.5 or any valid locally adopted Type II category upon which it relies, nor explained how the entire coordinated action, including demolition, substantial earth disturbance, grading, retaining-wall work, drainage alterations, removal and reconfiguration of parking and circulation, and creation of an actively programmed public gathering facility, falls wholly within that category. If the action is not Type II, the appropriate agency must complete the applicable SEQRA classification, environmental assessment, and determination-of-significance process 13 before approval. Even if the action ultimately is determined to be Type II, that classification does not diminish the Board's independent obligations under Town Law § 274-a and the Southold Town Code. These deficiencies are particularly material because the proposed redevelopment introduces a public gathering and programming area, including activities involving children, into a constrained area adjoining active commercial uses, established parking and circulation areas, substantial grade changes, and an interconnected retaining-wall and drainage environment. Final approval should not be based upon generalized assurances or plans that omit the existing physical and operational conditions necessary to evaluate the completed project. Jewell does not ask the Planning Board to adjudicate the ownership, legal existence, validity, scope, abandonment, relocation, merger, extinguishment, or enforceability of any easement, right-of-way, license, or other private property interest. Those issues remain reserved to a court of competent jurisdiction. The existence of disputed private rights, however, does not prevent the Board from requiring accurate plans and sufficient factual information concerning recorded interests, longstanding physical access and circulation conditions, and the practical planning consequences of the proposed design. Jewell therefore respectfully requests that the Board deny the application because the applicant has not demonstrated that the proposed site plan satisfies the standards governing approval. The deficiencies concern central elements of the design and cannot properly be deferred to post- approval review or generalized conditions. Alternatively, if the Board declines to deny the application, no approval should be granted unless and until the applicant submits materially revised plans and supporting analyses addressing: existing and proposed site conditions; • grading, excavation, retaining walls, drainage, and structural stability; • the net effect upon existing and longstanding site conditions and parking reflected in or existing during the earlier municipal proceedings; • passenger, delivery, refuse, maintenance, emergency, and snow-removal vehicle circulation; • pedestrian circulation and safety; • the proposed facility's anticipated operations; • material departures from prior approvals; and • reasonable alternative layouts capable of reducing avoidable impacts. If the Board elects to permit supplementation rather than deny the application, then following submission of that information and any materially revised plans, the Board should continue its review, keep the public hearing open or reopen it if it has already been closed and provide Jewell, adjoining property owners, interested agencies, and the public a meaningful opportunity to review and comment upon the completed submission before any final determination is made. The applicant bears the burden of supplying a record sufficient to permit the findings required for approval. The deficiencies identified below are not minor drafting omissions. They concern the proj ect's elimination of established parking and maneuvering space, narrowing and obstruction of practical access, incomplete depiction of existing conditions, lack of reliable vehicle-turning and commercial-truck analysis, unresolved pedestrian and emergency conflicts, 14 insufficient grading, drainage, retaining-wall and geotechnical information, undefined operational intensity, and failure to evaluate feasible alternatives. A fundamental deficiency in the application is that the plans largely depict only the improvements the Library proposes to construct, rather than the existing physical environment that those improvements will replace. The Planning Board is not reviewing development of a vacant or isolated parcel. It is reviewing the proposed transformation of a long-established commercial block characterized by shared parking, interconnected vehicular circulation, reciprocal access, rear commercial buildings, and longstanding operational relationships among adjoining properties. Without accurate plans depicting those existing physical conditions and their relationship to the proposed improvements, the Board cannot meaningfully compare existing and proposed conditions or make the findings required for site plan approval. III. THE LIBRARY'S MEMORANDUM ADDRESSES POSITIONS JEWELL HAS NEVER TAKEN AND DOES NOT RESOLVE THE ACTUAL PLANNING ISSUES BEFORE THE BOARD The actual planning question is different: whether the Board may approve permanent construction that removes parking and maneuvering space, narrows or obstructs a longstanding practical access system, and affects the continued use of adjoining property without a complete factual, engineering, parking, circulation, and alternatives record. The Board may and must evaluate those physical consequences without deciding the ultimate legal status of the underlying private rights. The Library's memorandum principally argues that the Planning Board may not adjudicate title, enlarge easements, compel a dedication, or determine the existence or scope of prescriptive rights. Jewell agrees with those general jurisdictional propositions, but has not requested any such determination. Jewell does not ask the Board to award property, expand a recorded instrument, declare an easement abandoned or preserved, or compel the Library to convey land. The approximately four-and-one-half-foot area discussed at the July 13 hearing was already depicted on the plans and was not newly supplied as a negotiated accommodation. The Board should not adopt "revocable license" as a legal determination or assume that the area is revocable. Its ultimate legal characterization is disputed and unnecessary to the Board's planning review. The plans should instead depict the recorded instruments, established physical circulation, and proposed changes accurately, while expressly reserving all private rights. The problem is not merely the disputed label attached to the area. The applicant has left uncertain whether the 4V2-foot strip shown on the plans will actually remain part of the completed configuration. The Board should not approve a plan whose circulation and access assumptions depend upon an area that the applicant claims it may later withdraw. The applicant must either commit to constructing and maintaining the plan as depicted or revise the application now to show the configuration it actually intends to implement. 15 Accordingly, the Library's jurisdictional argument does not answer the central deficiencies in the application. The Board must decide the plan on the actual administrative record, not on disputed litigation labels, and should not assume that longstanding physical conditions or recorded interests may be eliminated merely because their ultimate legal scope has not yet been adjudicated. Whether those longstanding circulation patterns ultimately correspond to enforceable easements, licenses, rights-of-way, or other private property interests is not the issue presently before the Board. Regardless of their ultimate legal characterization, they represent existing physical conditions that the Planning Board must understand before determining whether the proposed redevelopment satisfies the standards governing site plan approval. IV. THE SCOPE OF THE BOARD'S REVIEW CANNOT BE LIMITED BY CHARACTERIZING THE APPLICATION AS MERELY A LOT MERGER OR A BUILDING-NEUTRAL SITE PLAN AMENDMENT A. The Application Is Not Merely a Lot Merger or Administrative Amendment; It Seeks Approval of a Comprehensive Site Redevelopment During the course of this proceeding, it has been suggested that the present application should be viewed principally as a lot merger or as an amendment to a previously approved site plan because no enlargement of the existing Library building is proposed. Respectfully, that characterization does not accurately describe the application presently before the Planning Board and should not define or limit the scope of the Board's review. The Planning Board is not merely being asked to approve the merger of adjoining parcels. Nor is it being asked simply to acknowledge an administrative modification to an earlier approval. Rather, the Board is being asked to approve the permanent physical redevelopment of a substantial portion of the Library's property through a project the Library itself has described as costing approximately $1 million, through the demolition of existing improvements, the elimination and reconfiguration of longstanding parking and circulation areas, extensive grading and excavation, construction and reconstruction of retaining walls, drainage improvements, pedestrian pathways, amphitheater-style seating, landscaping, fencing, lighting, utilities, public gathering areas, children's programming, and other permanent site improvements intended to accommodate increased public use. These are not incidental consequences of a lot merger. They are the very improvements for which approval is sought. Accordingly, the Planning Board's responsibility is to evaluate the actual development proposed on the merged parcel, not merely the legal mechanism by which the parcel configuration is created. The fact that adjoining parcels may first be merged does not relieve the Board of its independent obligation to determine whether the resulting redevelopment satisfies the standards governing site plan approval under Town Law § 274-a, the Southold Town Code, and, to the extent applicable, SEQRA. 16 Nor does the absence of an addition to the existing Library building eliminate the need for meaningful review of the site improvements themselves. Many of the most significant planning impacts associated with this application arise entirely outside the existing building footprint. The proposed redevelopment would permanently alter parking supply, vehicular circulation, truck maneuvering, pedestrian movement, grading, drainage, retaining-wall systems, emergency access, loading operations, and the relationship between the Library property and adjoining commercial properties. Those impacts exist independently of whether the Library building itself is enlarged by a single square foot. Indeed, the application expressly contemplates a new publicly programmed open-space and gathering facility intended to increase public activity and visitation while simultaneously removing a substantial portion of the existing parking and circulation area. The Planning Board cannot meaningfully evaluate those operational changes by focusing solely upon the unchanged footprint of the existing Library building. To the extent it is asserted that the proposed redevelopment should receive only limited review because it is characterized as an amended site plan, a lot merger, or a project involving no material building expansion, the Board should identify the statutory, regulatory, or Code provisions supporting that conclusion. Nothing presently contained in the application demonstrates that such characterizations eliminate or diminish the Board's obligation to evaluate the physical, operational, engineering, circulation, parking, drainage, pedestrian safety, environmental, and compatibility issues created by the redevelopment actually proposed. The Board's responsibility is to review the application that has been submitted not a simplified description of it. Whatever procedural approvals may accompany the application, the Planning Board is ultimately being asked to authorize the construction and long-term operation of a substantially redeveloped public site. That proposal should therefore be evaluated upon the complete factual record and under the full planning standards applicable to the improvements actually proposed. B. The Absence of Building Enlargement Does Not Limit Site-Plan Review Site-plan review concerns the development and operation of land as a whole, not merely changes to a principal building. Parking, circulation, loading and service access, pedestrian safety, emergency access, grading, drainage, retaining walls, utilities, lighting, landscaping, compatibility with adjoining property, and the safe functioning of the completed site remain relevant whether or not the Library building is enlarged. Here, the principal impacts arise from redevelopment outside the existing building footprint: removal and reconfiguration of parking and circulation, grading and excavation, retaining walls, drainage improvements, pathways, fencing, lighting, utilities, amphitheater-style seating, and a publicly programmed gathering area. The Board should therefore review the actual site redevelopment proposed and should identify any authority relied upon if it concludes that the absence of building enlargement narrows that review. 17 C. The Present Record Does Not Establish That the Coordinated Redevelopment Qualifies as a Type II Action The Planning Department has indicated that the proposed redevelopment is exempt from further environmental review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act because it constitutes a Type II action. The present record, however, does not identify the particular subdivision of 6 NYCRR 617.5 or any valid locally adopted Type II category upon which that conclusion is based. Nor does the record explain how the entire coordinated redevelopment, considered as a single action, falls wholly within any such category. The action before the Board is not limited to the fact that the principal Library building will not be enlarged. It includes the merger or reconfiguration of parcels; demolition of existing improvements; removal and material alteration of parking and circulation areas; substantial grading and earth disturbance; retaining-wall construction and reconstruction; drainage and stormwater work; utility installation; fencing; walkways; stairs; accessory improvements; and the creation of an actively programmed public gathering facility intended to increase pedestrian and community use. SEQRA classification must address that complete physical and operational undertaking. It may not isolate the unchanged Library building from the site-wide redevelopment for which approval is actually sought. The proposed action also appears to involve substantial disturbance and movement of earth. The plans contemplate significant changes in elevation; grading, cut and fill; excavation associated with retaining walls and wall footings; stairs, pathways, utilities, drainage facilities, foundations, and other permanent improvements; and the placement, removal, or redistribution of soil and fill. Given the site's pronounced topography, terraced grades, and cascading system of existing retaining walls, that work cannot reasonably be dismissed as incidental landscaping without first identifying its actual scope, depth, volume, duration, construction methods, and engineering consequences. The present record does not quantify: • the total area of land disturbance; • the volume of soil or fill to be excavated, moved, imported, exported, or redistributed; • the maximum depth of excavation; • the location and dimensions of proposed cuts and fills; • the extent of alterations to existing grades and slopes; • whether temporary excavation support or dewatering will be required; • how excavated material will be handled, stockpiled, reused, transported, or disposed of; • the number, size, and routing of trucks and construction vehicles associated with the earthwork; or • the sequencing and duration of excavation, grading, retaining-wall, and drainage operations. 18 Nor does the application evaluate whether the proposed earthwork may alter groundwater conditions, increase hydrostatic pressure, destabilize slopes or terraced grades, redirect or concentrate stormwater, increase erosion or sedimentation, cause settlement, or adversely affect the structural performance of existing retaining walls and related grade-support systems extending onto or physically interacting with adjoining properties. The applicant also should not conflate the specialized treatment of"excavation" in a particular Environmental Assessment Form question with the broader obligation to evaluate physical alteration of the land. DEC guidance may distinguish ordinary grading, cut-and-fill, utility trenches, foundation work, and similar site preparation from "excavation, mining, or dredging" for purposes of a particular EAF Part 1 question where the disturbed material remains onsite. That limited reporting distinction does not render the work environmentally immaterial. Grading, filling, excavation, retaining-wall construction, drainage work, and other alteration of the land surface remain relevant physical impacts when an action is Type I or Unlisted. Accordingly, even if all disturbed soil remains on the Library property, the Board must still understand the area and depth of disturbance, cut-and-fill quantities, altered elevations and slopes, drainage and erosion consequences, groundwater and hydrostatic effects, retaining-wall stability, construction impacts, and effects upon adjoining property. If material will be imported to or exported from the site, the applicant should additionally disclose the quantities, source or destination, truck movements, stockpiling, handling, and disposal arrangements. The extent of the proposed earth disturbance is therefore a material component of the action that must be included in the Board's classification of the whole project. A Type II determination cannot rationally rest solely upon the absence of an enlargement to the principal Library building while disregarding substantial grading, excavation, cut and fill, retaining-wall work, drainage alteration, and related physical disturbance of the site. The absence of a building addition exceeding a particular floor-area threshold does not, without more, establish that the coordinated redevelopment is a Type II action. Before taking final action, the Board should identify the precise regulatory or locally adopted Type II provision relied upon and provide a record-based explanation demonstrating how every material component of the proposed action including the demolition, earthwork, parking and circulation changes, drainage work, retaining walls, public programming, and operational changes falls within that category. If the action is not expressly included within a Type II category, it must be classified as either Type I or Unlisted. In that event, the Board or appropriate lead agency must complete the applicable SEQRA process before granting approval, including identification and evaluation of the potentially significant impacts of the entire action and issuance of a written determination of significance supported by the administrative record. The relevant areas of environmental concern include, among others: • the removal or reduction of existing parking and maneuvering areas; 19 • changes in vehicular circulation and access; • commercial-truck, delivery, service, refuse, maintenance, and emergency-vehicle movements; increased pedestrian activity and children's programming adjacent to an active commercial access route; • present-day congestion, ingress, egress, and turning conditions on Main Road/NYS Route 25; • the total area, depth, and volume of grading, excavation, cut, and fill; • the importation, exportation, redistribution, stockpiling, handling, and disposal of soil or excavated material; • temporary excavation support, dewatering, construction access, erosion, dust, vibration, noise, and truck activity; • changes to existing slopes, terraced grades, groundwater, hydrostatic pressure, erosion patterns, and stormwater flow; • the stability and performance of existing and proposed retaining walls and related grade- support systems; • the potential for settlement, destabilization, drainage alteration, or physical impacts upon adjoining property; • impacts upon adjoining land uses and the historic commercial-center parking and circulation environment; • the cumulative effects of increased public activity combined with reduced parking and constrained circulation; and • the availability of reasonable site configurations capable of avoiding or reducing those impacts. For a Type I or Unlisted action, the administrative record must demonstrate that the agency identified the relevant areas of environmental concern, took the requisite hard look at those concerns, and provided a reasoned elaboration for its determination. A conclusory classification based principally upon the absence of an enlargement to the existing Library building would not satisfy that obligation. Alternatively, even if the Board identifies a legally applicable Type II category and explains how the coordinated action falls within it, that classification would end formal review under SEQRA only. It would not relieve the Planning Board of its independent obligations under Town Law § 274-a and the Southold Town Code to evaluate the complete site plan, require sufficient factual and technical information, and make rational, record-supported findings concerning parking, vehicular circulation, pedestrian safety, emergency and service access, earth disturbance, grading, drainage, retaining walls, project operations, and impacts upon adjoining properties. D. The Planning Board's Parking Review Is Not Limited to Determining Whether Additional Parking Spaces Are Required by the Zoning Code The apparent premise that no further parking analysis is required because the existing Library building is not being enlarged conflates two separate issues. Whether the Zoning Code requires 20 the construction of additional off-street parking spaces is one question. Whether the proposed redevelopment will continue to provide adequate, safe, and functional parking and circulation for the intended use of the site is an entirely different question. The Planning Board's responsibility extends beyond determining whether an application satisfies the minimum numerical parking requirements of the Zoning Code. Site plan review necessarily requires the Board to evaluate how the proposed redevelopment will function in practice, including whether existing parking resources are being removed, whether remaining parking and circulation will safely accommodate the anticipated use of the property, whether emergency and service access remain adequate, whether pedestrian and vehicular conflicts are increased, and whether the redevelopment adversely affects adjoining properties or the surrounding neighborhood. Those questions are presented squarely by this application. The proposal eliminates portions of the existing parking and circulation area in favor of a publicly programmed open-space and gathering facility intended to increase public activity and visitation. Whether or not the Zoning Code requires additional parking spaces because the existing Library building is not enlarged does not answer the separate planning question of whether the resulting site will continue to function safely and adequately after the redevelopment is completed. As set forth in Sections I.F and I.G, the 1989 record establishes that the Library's depicted parking was insufficient standing alone and that adjoining Feather Hill parking formed part of the planning context, while the 2013 resubdivision survey documents a gravel parking area straddling the present Jewell—Library boundary. The Planning Board should therefore make express findings regarding: whether existing parking spaces or parking opportunities are being eliminated or materially reduced; •whether the proposed circulation pattern remains safe and functional for patrons, pedestrians, delivery vehicles, emergency responders, and adjoining property owners; whether the parking assumptions reflected in prior Planning Board approvals remain valid in light of the express July 21, 2026 revocation of the former Feather Hill parking permission; whether the proposed public programming and gathering space will reasonably be expected to increase parking demand or alter patterns of site use; and whether the parking and circulation system, as redeveloped, remains adequate for the Library's existing and proposed operations. Those issues arise directly from the proposed redevelopment itself. They do not depend upon whether the Library building is enlarged or whether the Zoning Code independently requires additional parking spaces. A determination that no additional parking is required under the Code would not relieve the Planning Board of its separate obligation to evaluate whether the site, as proposed, will function safely, efficiently, and compatibly with surrounding properties after the redevelopment is complete. 21 The Planning Board's responsibility is not merely to count parking spaces; it is to determine whether the redeveloped site will operate safely, efficiently, and consistently with sound planning principles in light of the physical changes proposed and the operational realities reflected in the record. E. Approval of an Amended Site Plan Requires Independent Review of the Plan Presented; Prior Site Plan Approvals Do Not Automatically Govern the Present Application To the extent the present application is characterized as an amendment to a previously approved site plan, that characterization does not diminish the Planning Board's responsibility to evaluate the amended plan actually before it. The Board is not being asked merely to reaffirm prior approvals. Rather, it is being asked to determine whether the proposed amended site plan, including its new site improvements and operational changes, satisfies the standards governing site plan approval at the time of the present application. Accordingly, prior Planning Board approvals cannot simply be incorporated by reference or presumed to resolve issues presented by the current proposal. Each application must be evaluated upon its own record, and the Board must determine whether the physical improvements, circulation patterns, parking resources, drainage systems, landscaping, public use, compatibility with neighboring properties, and other site characteristics reflected on the amended plan satisfy applicable planning standards. Nor do factual assumptions underlying earlier approvals automatically carry forward to a materially different redevelopment proposal. Where an applicant relies upon prior approvals to support the present application, the Planning Board should first determine whether the circumstances upon which those approvals were based continue to exist. That issue is particularly significant here. The record from the 1989 Library approvals demonstrates that the Planning Board's review occurred in reliance upon specific factual circumstances, including the Library's documented written authorization to utilize the adjacent Feather Hill parking area, the availability of municipal parking, and the expectation that additional parking could be provided if necessary. The June 20, 1989 letter from Library counsel transmitting the written Feather Hill parking agreement and the Planning Board's July 13, 1989 recommendation expressly referencing that arrangement demonstrate that those parking resources formed part of the planning context in which the Board evaluated the Library's proposal. Likewise, the survey submitted to and endorsed by the Planning Board in connection with the 2013 resubdivision depicts a gravel parking area extending across what became the common property line between the Jewell parcel and the reconfigured Library parcel, providing contemporaneous evidence that parking and circulation physically operated across the parcel boundary. 22 The present application proposes to redevelop those same areas by removing or materially reconfiguring existing parking and circulation in favor of a publicly programmed open-space and gathering facility. At the same time, the Feather Hill parking resource considered during the earlier proceedings has been expressly withdrawn and revoked by the current owner and is no longer presently available to serve the Library. These changes are not merely administrative revisions to an existing plan; they alter the factual assumptions upon which earlier planning determinations were made. Accordingly, the Planning Board should not presume that findings supporting prior approvals necessarily apply to the amended site plan now before it. Rather, the Board should make independent findings, based upon the current record, regarding whether the amended site plan satisfies applicable planning standards in light of present site conditions, current parking resources, the proposed operational changes, and the impacts of the redevelopment itself. Finally, if the Board concludes that any findings or determinations contained in prior site plan approvals remain applicable to the present application, it should identify those findings with specificity and explain why the factual assumptions supporting them continue to exist notwithstanding the substantial changes proposed by the amended site plan. The mere designation of an application as an "amended site plan" does not exempt the amended improvements from review, nor does it relieve the Planning Board of its obligation to determine whether the amended plan itself satisfies the standards governing site plan approval. V. THE APPLICATION MUST BE REVIEWED ACCORDING TO WHAT IT ACTUALLY PROPOSES TO BUILD,NOT MERELY BY THE LABEL "POCKET PARK" The application before the Planning Board proposes a coordinated physical redevelopment of the Library property consisting of multiple related site improvements, including the construction of a public gathering space, alterations to parking and circulation, new fencing, landscaping, grading, drainage, lighting, walkways, retaining walls, and other permanent site features. Because these improvements function together as a single redevelopment project, the Board may not evaluate isolated components while disregarding the reasonably foreseeable planning consequences of the redevelopment as a whole. Site plan review requires consideration of the project's cumulative effect upon parking, circulation, pedestrian safety, emergency access, drainage, neighboring properties, and the other factors prescribed by Town Law § 274-a, the Southold Town Code, and, to the extent applicable, SEQRA. The applicant's characterization of the proposal as a "pocket park" cannot narrow that statutory review. A. The Proposal Must Be Evaluated in the Context of the Existing Physical Environment The interconnected parking, access, loading, delivery, and circulation environment described in Section I supplies the factual baseline for review. The Board is not considering development of 23 vacant or functionally isolated land; it is considering permanent construction within an established commercial block whose rear parking, access, maneuvering, and service functions have historically operated across adjoining areas and through shared travel corridors. The Board need not determine whether every aspect of that historical arrangement corresponds to an enforceable private right. It must, however, compare the completed design against the documented existing conditions including the parking configuration, rear access, maneuvering areas, loading and delivery operations, pedestrian travel, emergency access, and operational relationships among surrounding properties before determining whether the proposal provides safe and functional circulation, adequate access, sufficient engineering support, and appropriate protection of adjoining uses. B. The Proposal Is a Comprehensive and Permanent Site Redevelopment Although described as a "pocket park," the application combines a parcel merger or reconfiguration with permanent redevelopment of the resulting site. It includes demolition, removal and reconfiguration of parking and circulation, grading, retaining walls, drainage, utilities, pedestrian facilities, fencing, lighting, landscaping, accessory structures, amphitheater- style seating, and programmed gathering areas. These features must be evaluated together rather than as isolated minor improvements. The plans have also been presented as a permit set, reinforcing that the application concerns fixed, construction-ready improvements rather than a preliminary landscaping concept. Material questions affecting the buildability and operation of the approved layout therefore should be resolved before final approval. Jewell recognizes the public value of attractive open space and enhanced Library facilities. That public purpose does not substitute for a complete planning record or answer whether this particular design, in this location, provides adequate parking and circulation, protects pedestrians and emergency access, addresses engineering and operational impacts, and reasonably minimizes effects upon adjoining properties. The parcel merger likewise does not answer whether the physical redevelopment is properly designed. The Board should therefore identify the approvals sought for the merger and redevelopment, the existing improvements and parking to be removed, the permanent improvements to be constructed, the resulting parking and circulation system, the intended intensity of use, and the additional permits and reviews required. The cumulative effect of converting an established parking and circulation area into a permanent public facility is the relevant planning inquiry. C. The Proposed Public Use Is More Intensive Than Passive Open Space The character and intensity of the proposed use also matter. 24 A landscaped area intended solely for passive viewing may present one set of planning considerations. A publicly accessible gathering facility containing amphitheater-style seating, programmed activities, events, lighting, utilities, pathways, and accessory structures presents another. The applicant has repeatedly represented that the proposed facility will accommodate "children's programming" and other community activities. Those stated operational objectives necessarily contemplate increased use of the site by children, families, Library patrons, and other pedestrians. The Board should therefore evaluate the proposal based upon the uses the applicant itself anticipates, rather than as a passive landscaped area. The application, however, contains no meaningful analysis of pedestrian circulation, internal traffic patterns, vehicle-pedestrian conflict points, sight distances, commercial loading operations, truck turning movements, or the interaction between increased pedestrian activity and the active commercial access drive serving the adjoining Jewell Property. Nor does the application demonstrate that commercial delivery vehicles, refuse collection vehicles, service trucks, and emergency vehicles can safely maneuver within the site without reversing toward or onto Main Road(NYS Route 25), a heavily traveled state highway and principal commercial corridor. These are fundamental site-planning considerations that should be addressed before approval of a facility specifically intended to attract increased public use, including "children's programming." The application should therefore clearly disclose: the anticipated hours of use; whether organized events or programs are contemplated; the anticipated number of users; whether amplified sound may be used; whether evening use is anticipated; the extent and hours of lighting; how the site will be supervised; how trash and refuse will be handled; how maintenance vehicles will enter and operate; how snow and ice will be managed; how emergency access will be provided; whether temporary tents, equipment, displays, or stages may be used; whether food service or vending is contemplated; and whether the proposed gathering areas implicate occupancy, accessibility, fire-safety, or Building Department requirements. These questions are not intended to obstruct the Library's programming. They are necessary to determine the actual nature and intensity of the proposed use and whether the site has been designed to accommodate that use safely and compatibly. A project should not be reviewed as passive landscaping if it is designed and expected to function as an active public assembly or event space. D. The Proposal Materially Alters the Existing Parking and Circulation System The property proposed for redevelopment currently serves, in substantial part, as a parking and vehicular circulation area. 25 The project would permanently convert much of that area into public open space and related improvements. That conversion is one of the most significant features of the application and should be quantified precisely. The applicant has referred to the creation or addition of parking spaces. That characterization is potentially misleading unless the Board considers the net effect of the proposal. The relevant questions are: How many lawful or physically existing parking spaces are present today? How many spaces will be removed? How many replacement spaces will be constructed? How many net spaces will remain? Are all proposed spaces independently usable? Are their dimensions and access aisles compliant? Can vehicles enter and leave the spaces without relying upon disputed or unavailable maneuvering areas? Do accessible spaces and access aisles satisfy applicable standards? Will any spaces be unavailable during events or programmed uses? Does the calculation include areas historically used for parking but omitted from the applicant's characterization of existing conditions? Based upon the apparent existing configuration, the project may eliminate a substantial amount of parking and maneuvering space while creating only a limited number of newly delineated spaces. Jewell does not ask the Board to rely upon an estimate; the applicant should establish the precise existing, removed, proposed, and net parking counts through an accurate survey and reconciled parking schedule. The precise number should not be estimated by opponents, Board members, or members of the public. It should be established by the applicant through a clear existing-versus-proposed parking schedule, supported by an accurate survey and dimensioned plan. Until that information is supplied, the project should not be described as "adding parking."At most, it appears to add several newly delineated spaces while eliminating a considerably larger existing parking field. The net loss, not merely the number of new striped spaces, is the planning fact that matters. E. The Proposal Is Intended to Increase Public Activity While Reducing Available Parking The Library has consistently presented the proposed redevelopment as an enhancement to its facilities and as a destination intended to encourage increased public use, outdoor programming, community gatherings, and other civic activities. Jewell supports those objectives. Those anticipated benefits, however, necessarily carry corresponding planning consequences. Increased public use reasonably can be expected to generate additional vehicle trips, increased 26 demand for parking, greater pedestrian activity, deliveries, maintenance operations, and other operational impacts. Yet the application simultaneously proposes to eliminate a substantial portion of the existing parking area while providing little quantitative analysis demonstrating that the remaining parking supply and circulation system will adequately accommodate those increased demands. The Board should therefore evaluate the cumulative effect of increased activity together with reduced parking and altered circulation rather than considering each issue in isolation. F. Building, Fire,Accessibility, Structural, and Permit Questions Remain Relevant to Site-Plan Review The Planning Board need not perform the duties of the Building Department, Fire Marshal, or other reviewing agencies. It should nevertheless determine whether the proposed design has been sufficiently developed to identify the approvals and technical reviews that will be required. The record should clarify, among other things, whether permits or technical review will be required for: retaining walls; stairs and guards; ramps and accessible routes; amphitheater or terraced seating; shade structures; the proposed shed or accessory structure; electrical service and site lighting; drainage facilities; foundations and footings; fencing and gates; occupancy or assembly use; fire access and emergency response; stormwater management; grading and fill; and any proposed utility connection. The Board should also confirm that the plans submitted for site-plan approval are consistent with the plans that will be submitted to the Building Department. Material site features should not be deferred until after approval if their dimensions, placement, structural requirements, or code compliance may affect parking, circulation, setbacks, drainage, or adjoining property. The purpose is not to require every construction detail at the site-plan stage. It is to ensure that the Board is not approving a concept that will later require material redesign once structural, accessibility, fire-safety, or permit requirements are applied. G. The Board Should Require a Complete Existing-Conditions and Proposed- Conditions Comparison A meaningful review requires a transparent comparison between what exists and what is proposed. The applicant should provide, at minimum: 27 1. an accurate existing-conditions survey; 2. a demolition plan identifying all improvements and parking areas to be removed; 3. a proposed site plan showing all permanent improvements; 4. a parking table comparing existing, previously approved, removed, proposed, and net parking spaces; 5. a circulation plan showing vehicle paths, aisle widths, turning areas, loading, maintenance, emergency access, and snow storage; 6. a grading and drainage plan showing existing and proposed elevations; 7. a utility and lighting plan; 8. a plan accurately plotting recorded rights-of-way and other relevant instruments without purporting to determine their legal validity; 9. dimensions and details for all fences, gates, walls, footings, structures, curbs, and landscaping adjoining circulation areas or property boundaries; and 10. a narrative identifying the anticipated programming, capacity, hours, maintenance, and operational characteristics of the proposed public facility. Until those materials are supplied, the Board cannot reliably determine what is being eliminated, what is being built, or how the completed site will function. H. The Proj ect's Combined Operational Effects Must Be Evaluated The individual elements of the proposal cannot rationally be evaluated in isolation. Parking loss must be considered together with the programmed public use and resulting activity; circulation together with fences, gates, walls, landscaping, curbs, grading, parked vehicles, pedestrians, and snow; and drainage together with excavation, altered grades, hardscape, and the existing retaining-wall system. It is the combined operational effect of the completed redevelopment not the characterization of each component as individually minor that determines whether the site plan is sound. I. The Board Should Review the Application as Substantial Redevelopment and Require the Record Necessary for That Review For these reasons, the Board should expressly recognize that the application proposes substantially more than landscaping or a passive public garden. It is a redevelopment project that would permanently alter: the physical configuration of the site; the amount and location of parking; vehicular circulation; access and maneuvering; grading and drainage; the intensity and character of public use; the relationship between the Library property and adjoining property; and the continued lawful use and legally available land-use flexibility of the adjoining properties. The Board should therefore require the applicant to submit the information necessary to evaluate those effects before any approval is granted. Approval should not rest upon the benign label attached to the project. It should rest upon a complete record demonstrating that the project, as actually designed and intended to operate, satisfies the applicable planning standards and will not create avoidable or inadequately studied impacts. 28 VI. THE APPLICATION DOES NOT PROVIDE THE INFORMATION NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE REQUIRED FINDINGS. Site plan review necessarily extends beyond the boundaries of the applicant's parcel. The Planning Board is required to evaluate the relationship of the proposed development to adjoining properties and the surrounding area, including vehicular circulation, access, parking, pedestrian movement, loading, emergency access, drainage, grading, traffic safety, and other off-site impacts that may reasonably result from the proposal. Here, however, the plans focus almost exclusively upon improvements located within the Library parcel. They contain little or no meaningful information concerning the existing conditions, circulation patterns, parking configuration, maneuvering areas, adjoining buildings, shared access corridor, or operational relationship of the surrounding commercial properties that will necessarily be affected by the proposed redevelopment. Without that information, the Board cannot adequately evaluate how the project will function within its existing physical context or make the findings required for site plan approval. Jewell is not required to prove conclusively that the proposed configuration is unsafe or unworkable. The applicant must supply sufficiently complete plans and competent evidence to permit the Board to make the affirmative findings necessary for site-plan approval. The absence of that proof cannot be cured by requiring Jewell, the Board, or the public to reconstruct existing conditions or speculate how the completed site will function. Although the applicant depicts the proposed improvements as located upon the Library parcel, the application necessarily affects the adjoining commercial properties, including the Jewell Property and the longstanding shared circulation environment immediately surrounding the project. Yet the plans contain no meaningful depiction or analysis of how vehicles serving adjoining properties presently circulate, where loading and deliveries occur, how customers maneuver through the existing parking configuration, how emergency vehicles access the rear commercial buildings, or how the proposed fences, retaining walls, landscaping, sidewalks, narrowed access, and other permanent improvements will alter those existing operational conditions. The omission is significant because site plan review requires evaluation of the project's effect upon neighboring properties, not merely the applicant's own parcel. A. The Existing Physical Environment Is Not Adequately Depicted A fundamental purpose of site plan review is to evaluate how proposed development will affect the surrounding area in comparison to existing conditions. That evaluation necessarily requires accurate and sufficiently detailed plans depicting not only the proposed improvements, but also the existing physical conditions and operational characteristics of the site and adjoining properties that will be altered by the proposal. Here, however, the application largely depicts only the improvements the Library proposes to construct. It does not adequately depict the existing integrated physical and operational baseline: the existing parking, circulation, maneuvering, access, and operational relationships that presently exist between the Library Property and the adjoining commercial properties, including the Jewell Property. 29 For decades, the commercial properties fronting on Main Road have functioned as an integrated commercial block rather than as isolated parcels. As discussed above, access to the parking areas and commercial buildings located behind the Main Road frontage has historically been provided through the narrow shared access corridor located along the common boundary between the Jewell Property and the adjoining Library parcel, together with reciprocal rights-of-way, shared parking areas, and interconnected circulation patterns that evolved over many decades. The survey submitted and endorsed in connection with the 2013 lot-line modification further documents an existing gravel parking area extending across and straddling the boundary between the Jewell Property and the Library parcel, corroborating that the existing parking and circulation environment physically operated across the parcel boundary rather than as entirely separate facilities. These longstanding physical conditions form the baseline against which the impacts of the proposed redevelopment must be evaluated. The plans submitted by the applicant, however, do not meaningfully depict the existing circulation system serving the surrounding commercial properties. They do not identify the existing shared maneuvering areas, the actual vehicular travel paths historically used to access rear parking and commercial buildings, the relationship between adjoining parking areas, or the manner in which vehicles presently circulate through the rear of the commercial block. Nor do the plans adequately depict the existing rear access serving the commercial buildings located behind the Main Road frontage or the practical interaction between those buildings and the proposed improvements. Without an accurate depiction of these existing conditions, neither the Planning Board nor the public can meaningfully compare the existing circulation environment with the circulation pattern that would result from the proposed redevelopment. Similarly, the plans contain no meaningful analysis of the operational characteristics of the existing site. They do not demonstrate how delivery vehicles presently access the rear commercial buildings, where loading and unloading occur, how service vehicles maneuver within the shared circulation area, or whether the proposed fences, retaining walls, sidewalks, landscaping, and narrowed access corridor will materially alter or impair those operations. The application contains no turning templates, swept-path analyses, or comparable engineering studies demonstrating that delivery trucks, refuse vehicles, emergency apparatus, or other design vehicles can safely maneuver within the redesigned circulation system while maintaining the existing functionality of the surrounding commercial properties. The application likewise fails to evaluate existing pedestrian movements throughout the area. The surrounding properties are not vacant parcels but active commercial uses generating regular pedestrian activity between Main Road, the rear parking areas, adjoining businesses, and the municipal parking facilities. Yet the plans provide little information concerning existing pedestrian travel paths, pedestrian-vehicle conflict points, or the effect that the proposed redesign will have upon those established circulation patterns. Emergency access is similarly insufficiently addressed. The existing rear commercial buildings have historically been served through the integrated circulation system extending behind the Main Road frontage. The application does not adequately demonstrate how fire apparatus, ambulances, police vehicles, utility vehicles, or other emergency responders will safely access, 30 maneuver, stage, or exit the affected area following construction of the proposed improvements, nor does it evaluate whether narrowing or reconfiguring the existing circulation environment will adversely affect emergency operations serving adjoining properties. These omissions are not minor drafting deficiencies. They prevent the Planning Board from evaluating the proposal in its actual physical context. Site plan review requires an assessment of the relationship between the proposed development and the surrounding properties as they presently exist not merely an examination of improvements confined within the applicant's parcel boundaries. Because the application fails to adequately depict and analyze the existing parking configuration, shared maneuvering areas, circulation patterns, adjoining commercial buildings, rear access, delivery operations, pedestrian movements, emergency access, and other existing operational characteristics of the surrounding properties, the Board lacks the factual record necessary to determine whether the proposal satisfies the standards governing site plan approval. Those deficiencies independently warrant denial of the application or, at a minimum, require the submission of revised plans and supporting analyses accurately depicting existing conditions before any approval may properly be considered. B. Reliance Upon Municipal Parking Does Not Demonstrate Safe On-Site Circulation The applicant's assertion that nearby municipal parking resolves the identified circulation concerns is unsupported by any traffic, parking-demand, operational, or engineering analysis. The availability of public parking elsewhere in the vicinity does not demonstrate that the proposed site itself will function safely or efficiently. It does not. Nor does it establish that vehicles entering the site can safely maneuver, reverse direction, accommodate deliveries, or exit without conflict at the narrow shared access along the common boundary between the Jewell Property and the adjoining Library parcel. Whether motorists may choose to park elsewhere has little bearing upon whether the redesigned circulation pattern safely accommodates those vehicles that do enter the site. The assertion is therefore conclusory and speculative. The application contains no traffic study, parking-demand analysis, circulation study, engineering report, turning analysis, operational study, or other competent evidence demonstrating that the availability of municipal parking would reduce on-site vehicle movements, lessen maneuvering conflicts, eliminate delivery or service-vehicle issues, or otherwise mitigate the operational deficiencies identified in this proceeding. The assertion that municipal parking resolves those concerns is therefore unsupported by the record and amounts to little more than speculation. Even if nearby municipal parking reduces the number of vehicles parked on the Library property, it does not eliminate the need for safe and functional internal circulation. Patrons, employees, deliveries, refuse collection, maintenance vehicles, emergency responders, and service vehicles must still enter, maneuver within, and exit the site safely. Site plan approval must therefore rest upon competent engineering and planning evidence demonstrating that the proposed circulation system functions safely within the project itself and in relation to adjoining properties not upon 31 unsupported assumptions that off-site municipal parking will eliminate or materially reduce on- site operational conflicts. In the absence of turning templates, circulation studies, vehicle-swept-path analyses, loading analyses, traffic engineering evaluations, or comparable competent evidence, reliance upon nearby municipal parking remains speculative and conclusory and cannot substitute for proof that the proposed circulation pattern safely accommodates the reasonably foreseeable use of the site. Moreover, municipal parking addresses only the availability of parking spaces. It does not address the separate planning questions of internal circulation, vehicle maneuverability, loading operations, emergency access, pedestrian safety, or the practical ability of vehicles to enter and exit the site. Those issues must be independently demonstrated regardless of the existence of nearby public parking. Nor does nearby municipal parking establish adequate employee, accessible, pickup-and-drop- off, delivery, service, or event parking, or demonstrate that parking and circulation resources considered during prior municipal proceedings may be eliminated without replacement or current analysis. C. The Application Omits Essential Geotechnical, Retaining-Wall, and Stormwater Analyses The proposed redevelopment involves substantial site alteration, including extensive excavation, grading, retaining wall construction and reconstruction, stairways, pathways, utilities, drainage improvements, and other earthwork associated with a project the Library itself has identified as a capital project with an estimated cost of approximately $1,000,000. The project site is characterized by significant changes in elevation along Main Road and across the adjoining properties. Existing development is supported by a series of cascading retaining walls extending from west to east, including walls exceeding twelve feet in height. The existing walls and terraced grades appear physically related and may function as an interconnected grade- support and drainage system. The present record does not contain sufficient engineering information to determine the extent of that interrelationship or the effect of the proposed work upon it. Despite the substantial proposed earth disturbance and work affecting retaining walls, the application contains no geotechnical investigation, soils report, slope stability analysis, hydrostatic pressure evaluation, groundwater analysis, stormwater infiltration study, or engineering assessment addressing how the proposed excavation, grading, drainage modifications, or retaining wall work may affect adjoining properties or the interconnected retaining wall system extending beyond the Library's parcel, and even beyond Jewell's parcel. 32 The applicant itself acknowledged during the July 13, 2026 Planning Board hearing that the site's topography presents a "good challenge," yet the application still contains no geotechnical investigation, hydrostatic pressure analysis, groundwater evaluation, slope stability analysis, or engineering assessment demonstrating that the proposed excavation, retaining wall work, and drainage modifications will not adversely affect adjoining properties or the interconnected retaining wall system. The omission is particularly significant because the plans submitted by the applicant are drawn almost exclusively to the Library's property boundaries and do not meaningfully depict the existing retaining walls, grades, drainage patterns, or structural conditions on the adjoining Jewell property or the properties immediately to the east. Consequently, neither the Planning Board nor the public can evaluate whether the proposed work may alter groundwater conditions, increase hydrostatic loading, change surface-water runoff, destabilize existing retaining walls, or adversely affect adjoining improvements. Because these issues involve foreseeable engineering consequences of the proposed site alterations, they cannot be resolved through assumption or speculation. Before granting site plan approval, the Board should require appropriate engineering and geotechnical analyses demonstrating that the proposed grading, excavation, retaining-wall work, drainage modifications, and earth disturbance will not adversely affect adjoining properties or any physically interconnected retaining-wall, grading, or drainage systems extending beyond the Library parcel. D. The Application Does Not Evaluate Pedestrian Safety or Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflicts The omission of surrounding conditions also prevents meaningful evaluation of pedestrian safety. The plans do not adequately depict the existing pedestrian routes, commercial vehicle paths, loading activity, sight conditions, or conflict points necessary to determine how children's programming and other public uses will coexist with the active commercial access and circulation environment. As addressed more fully in Section VII.D, the applicant should demonstrate through dimensioned plans, conflict-point analysis, sight-distance information, and appropriate vehicle-turning studies that the proposed gathering space can operate safely under ordinary conditions. VII. THE PRESENT RECORD IS INCOMPLETE AND DOES NOT PROVIDE A SUFFICIENT BASIS FOR APPROVAL Even apart from the unresolved property-rights issues discussed above, the application should not be approved on the present record because the Board has not been provided with the information necessary to determine how the completed site will function. The deficiencies are not peripheral. They concern the essential planning elements of the application: parking, circulation, turning movements, access, emergency response, deliveries, 33 maintenance, construction logistics, drainage, grading, utilities, lighting, public use, and the effect of the proposed improvements upon adjoining property. The Library's counsel has devoted substantial attention to what the Planning Board may not decide. That does not relieve the applicant of its obligation to provide the factual and technical information necessary for the Board to decide the matters that are squarely within its jurisdiction. The burden should not fall upon Jewell, the Board, or the public to infer how vehicles will maneuver, estimate the number of parking spaces lost, determine whether emergency or maintenance vehicles can operate safely, or speculate about the effects of fencing, retaining walls, grading, and landscaping. Those matters should be demonstrated on the plans and supported by competent analysis before approval not left to be discovered after construction. A. The Application Does Not Provide a Reliable Parking Baseline or Demand Analysis The application provides neither a reconciled parking baseline nor a current parking-demand analysis. It does not compare parking presently existing or historically available, parking reflected in relevant prior municipal submissions, parking proposed to be removed, parking proposed to remain or be created, and the resulting net change. Nor does it identify accessible spaces, aisle and stall dimensions, spaces dependent upon adjoining maneuvering areas, spaces affected by events, deliveries, maintenance, or snow storage, or whether each retained and proposed space can be independently entered and exited under ordinary operating conditions. The record likewise does not identify the number of Library employees and volunteers who park on-site, ordinary and peak patron demand, the frequency and attendance of programs and special events, seasonal variation, overlapping activities, pickup and drop-off needs, or the additional demand reasonably associated with expanded outdoor programming. The existence of nearby municipal parking does not establish adequate employee, accessible, pickup-and-drop-off, delivery, service, or event parking and does not replace a survey-supported parking schedule and competent demand analysis demonstrating that the remaining supply will serve the Library's existing and proposed operations. B. The Application Does Not Demonstrate Safe and Functional Passenger- and Commercial-Vehicle Circulation The central physical concern is not merely whether a narrow linear passage remains visible on the plans. It is whether passenger vehicles, delivery trucks, refuse vehicles, service vehicles, maintenance vehicles, and emergency apparatus can practically enter, circulate, maneuver, reach the parking serving the Jewell Property, turn where necessary, and exit safely after all proposed improvements have been constructed. Vehicular access requires more than a nominal or mathematically unobstructed width. It requires sufficient operating space to accommodate turning radii, forward and reverse movements, 34 vehicle envelopes, parking-space access, delivery and loading operations, emergency access, and safe egress without conflict with fences, gates, posts, footings, walls, curbs, landscaping, structures, parked vehicles, pedestrians, or snow accumulation. The application contains no adequate dimensioned turning analysis, swept-path study, or vehicle- maneuvering plan demonstrating that the completed configuration will remain functional. The analysis should show, at minimum: the width of all travel areas; turning radii and vehicle envelopes; forward and reverse movements; clearances from fences, gates, walls, posts, landscaping, curbs, structures, and parked vehicles; access to the parking serving the Jewell Property; the ability of vehicles to turn around without entering unavailable or disputed areas; the effect of proposed parking spaces and public activity upon maneuvering; delivery, refuse, maintenance, service, and emergency-vehicle movements; and safe egress without backing toward or onto Main Road. Of particular concern, the plans do not demonstrate that commercial vehicles can turn around within the available area. If adequate turnaround space is unavailable, delivery and service vehicles may be forced to reverse toward or onto Main Road, a heavily traveled state highway and principal commercial corridor. The application contains no competent analysis demonstrating that such operations can be conducted safely or without conflict with motorists, pedestrians, adjoining commercial uses, or the proposed public gathering area. A corridor that appears unobstructed on a conceptual plan may become functionally unusable once fences, gates, wall footings, curbs, landscaping, drainage structures, lighting fixtures, parked vehicles, snow accumulation, pedestrians, and maintenance activities are taken into account. The Board should therefore require dimensioned passenger- and commercial-vehicle turning analyses demonstrating that practical access to Jewell's parking and safe commercial- vehicle egress will remain available under ordinary operating conditions. The analysis should also establish whether two vehicles can pass where operationally necessary; whether every retained or proposed parking space can be independently entered and exited; whether vehicles can turn without using adjoining or disputed areas; and how the system functions with vehicles occupying the proposed spaces, landscaping at maturity, gate swings, posts, bollards, lighting fixtures, pedestrians, and snow accumulation. C. The Application Does Not Adequately Evaluate the Existing Route 25 Curb Cut, Divided Ownership of the Driveway, or the Sidewalk Crossing The shared driveway reaches Main Road/NYS Route 25 through an existing curb cut and driveway apron that serve the rear access and parking associated with the Jewell Property as well as adjoining circulation. The application does not meaningfully analyze how the proposed narrowing, fencing, gating, landscaping, parking configuration, or other permanent improvements will affect the continued safe and practical operation of that curb cut. The physical driveway served by the curb cut is not owned entirely by the Library. Jewell owns part of the driveway and relies upon the Route 25 curb opening as the Main Road connection to 35 its property. The applicant therefore cannot accurately present the curb opening, driveway apron, or internal continuation of the access as a solely Library-owned or Library-controlled facility. That distinction matters because the pending application seeks approval of permanent improvements that may alter the practical width, alignment, visibility, internal continuation, and functionality of the driveway. The Library has pursued those approvals without including Jewell as an owner or consenting participant concerning the portion of the driveway owned by Jewell and without demonstrating that the plans and agency submissions accurately distinguish among Library-owned property, Jewell-owned property, recorded access areas, and the broader historically traveled and maneuvering areas. The Planning Board need not adjudicate the parties' ultimate private rights to recognize that an applicant may not obtain approval upon materially incomplete plans that depict or affect property beyond its sole ownership or control. At a minimum, the plans must accurately disclose the ownership boundaries, identify the portion of the driveway owned by Jewell, distinguish that area from Library property, and establish that no proposed work or approval purports to authorize construction upon, alteration of, or control over property not owned or lawfully controlled by the applicant. The curb cut cannot be evaluated independently from the internal circulation area behind it. Vehicles entering from Route 25 must be able to clear the traveled roadway and sidewalk promptly and proceed into the site without stopping, queuing, or reversing across the pedestrian path. Vehicles exiting must have sufficient internal alignment, sight distance, and maneuvering space to approach the sidewalk and highway in a controlled forward movement. If the proposed layout reduces available width or turnaround space, vehicles may be required to pause across the sidewalk, undertake multi-point movements near the curb cut, or reverse toward Main Road. These concerns are heightened because the driveway crosses the public sidewalk on the north side of Main Road in the center of Southold's commercial district. That sidewalk carries substantial pedestrian traffic between Feather Hill, the nearby bus stop, the pharmacy, the Library, and other shops and services along Main Road. Pedestrians using that route include shoppers, transit riders, Library patrons, older persons, families, and children. The driveway crossing therefore presents a significant and recurring vehicle-pedestrian conflict point. Drivers entering or leaving the site must divide their attention among pedestrians approaching from both directions, vehicles and trucks on Route 25, limited gaps in highway traffic, parked or maneuvering vehicles within the site, and any fence, gate, wall, landscaping, or other feature affecting visibility. The danger is especially pronounced if vehicles cannot turn within the rear area and must reverse toward the sidewalk or Main Road, or if entering vehicles cannot fully clear the sidewalk because the internal access is blocked or constricted. The application contains no current analysis of the curb-cut geometry, driveway-apron width, sidewalk sight lines, pedestrian volumes, pedestrian approach directions, vehicle queuing, stopping or backing movements, visibility obstructions, or the interaction between the driveway 36 crossing and nearby pedestrian destinations. Nor does it demonstrate that the proposed design preserves sufficient internal storage and maneuvering space for vehicles to clear the sidewalk promptly and remain entirely off the pedestrian route while waiting to enter Route 25. Before approval, the applicant should be required to provide a dimensioned curb-cut and sidewalk-crossing analysis prepared by a qualified traffic or transportation professional. That analysis should demonstrate that the completed configuration will preserve safe ingress and egress for the Jewell Property, maintain adequate visibility of pedestrians approaching from both directions, prevent vehicles from queuing or stopping across the sidewalk, and avoid unsafe backing or multi-point movements through the pedestrian crossing or toward Route 25. D. Pedestrian Safety and Emergency Access Have Not Been Adequately Demonstrated Pedestrian-safety concerns are not confined to the proposed park area. The existing driveway crosses the Main Road sidewalk before reaching Route 25, creating a separate and significant conflict point. The Board must evaluate the entire path of vehicular movement from the rear parking and circulation areas, through the constrained access corridor, across the sidewalk, and into the State highway rather than examine only conflicts located within the Library parcel. The proposed redevelopment intentionally creates a publicly programmed open-space and gathering facility that, according to the applicant's own submissions, is intended to accommodate "children's programming" and other community activities. By the applicant's own description, the proposal is specifically designed to attract increased pedestrian activity, including children, families, Library patrons, and other visitors, immediately adjacent to an active commercial access drive serving the adjoining Jewell Property and neighboring businesses. That access drive is not merely a parking aisle serving the Library. It functions as an active commercial circulation route utilized for customer traffic, employee access, commercial deliveries, loading and unloading, refuse collection, service and maintenance vehicles, utility access, and emergency response serving adjoining commercial properties. The application contains no meaningful analysis of how those ongoing commercial operations will safely coexist with a public gathering area intentionally designed to attract children and other pedestrians. The plans do not include a pedestrian circulation study, identify potential vehicle-pedestrian conflict points, evaluate sight-distance, analyze truck turning movements or loading operations, demonstrate adequate physical separation between pedestrian gathering areas and commercial vehicle movements, or assess whether reasonable alternative site layouts could substantially reduce foreseeable conflicts while still accomplishing the Library's stated objectives. The applicant should therefore be required to demonstrate, through dimensioned plans, pedestrian circulation analyses, and passenger- and commercial-vehicle turning studies, that practical access to Jewell's parking and adjoining commercial operations will remain safe and functional under ordinary operating conditions not merely under an idealized plan depicting no delivery vehicles, pedestrians, snow accumulation, landscaping growth, or other routine 37 operational conditions. The evaluation of pedestrian safety, internal circulation, commercial loading operations, emergency access, and foreseeable vehicle-pedestrian conflicts falls squarely within the Planning Board's responsibilities under Town Law § 274-a, the Southold Town Code, and, to the extent applicable, SEQRA. These issues are wholly independent of any dispute concerning private property rights. Regardless of the ultimate resolution of any easement or access issue, the Board should require the applicant to demonstrate that a facility intended for "children's programming" and other public activities can safely coexist with the established commercial vehicular operations that presently utilize this access corridor. The proposed project introduces or expands a public gathering use while reducing or reconfiguring vehicular areas. That combination requires careful consideration of emergency access. The Board should be provided with a clear explanation of: how fire, ambulance, police, and other emergency vehicles will approach the site; whether emergency vehicles can enter and turn; whether gates or bollards will impede access; whether any emergency route depends upon private or disputed areas; how the site will function during a public event; where emergency responders will stage; whether the proposed amphitheater, seating, structures, walls, or landscaping create access limitations; whether accessible emergency egress has been addressed; whether fire lanes or clear zones are required; and whether the appropriate emergency-service or fire-safety authorities have reviewed the design. Separately, the pedestrian and traffic analysis should address the existing Route 25 curb cut and driveway apron; the pedestrian crossing over the driveway; pedestrian approach routes from Feather Hill, the bus stop, the pharmacy, the Library, and other Main Road businesses; pedestrian volumes and peak periods; sight distance in both sidewalk directions; vehicle queuing or stopping across the sidewalk; and the ability of vehicles to clear the pedestrian path before waiting to enter highway traffic. The Board should not assume that emergency access can be resolved later if the eventual solution may require relocation of fencing, walls, landscaping, parking, or structures. The analysis should specifically evaluate the public sidewalk crossing at the Route 25 driveway apron and the substantial pedestrian movements between Feather Hill, the nearby bus stop, the pharmacy, the Library, and other businesses and destinations along the north side of Main Road. It should identify pedestrian approach directions and peak periods, pedestrian sight distance, vehicle sight distance, visibility obstructions, stopping and queuing locations, backing movements, pedestrian-vehicle conflict points, and measures necessary to prevent vehicles from blocking or reversing through the sidewalk crossing. The applicant should therefore be required to demonstrate, through dimensioned pedestrian- circulation plans, sight-distance information, conflict-point analysis, turning studies, and appropriate emergency-service review, that the proposed gathering space can safely coexist with 38 ordinary commercial vehicle movements and that fire, ambulance, police, and other emergency vehicles can approach, access, maneuver within, stage at, and exit the site after all proposed improvements have been constructed. E. The Effect of the Proposed Fencing and Gates Has Not Been Adequately Evaluated The proposed fencing is especially significant because it may permanently define and constrain the area available for vehicular movement. A fence placed along the western side of the disputed or historically used circulation area could convert what has functioned as a broader maneuvering area into a narrow channel. Even if the fence does not physically occupy a recorded right-of-way, it may materially affect the practical ability to use that right-of-way or reach adjoining parking. The Board should require the plans to identify: the exact fence alignment; fence height and material; post locations; footing dimensions; gate locations; gate widths; direction of gate swing; locking arrangements; hours of access; responsibility for opening and maintaining any gate; emergency access arrangements; clear width after posts and hardware are installed; clearance from walls, curbs, landscaping, and parked vehicles; and whether the fence can be relocated without disturbing other approved improvements if future rights are judicially established. These details are not merely construction matters. They directly affect circulation, safety, access, and the ability to preserve the status quo. The Board should also reject any suggestion that a gated or revocable arrangement is equivalent to unobstructed practical access. A route dependent upon another owner's discretionary control, hours, locks, or future willingness to maintain access is materially different from an open and continuously usable circulation area. The uncertainty concerning the approximately 41/2-foot strip makes this information especially important. If the Library claims a unilateral right to withdraw or restrict that area, the Board must evaluate the completed site without assuming that the depicted width will remain available. Conversely, if approval is based upon continued availability of the strip, the approved plans and resolution should make clear that the relevant configuration may not be materially narrowed, obstructed, fenced, gated, relocated, or eliminated without submission and approval of an amended site plan. F. Deliveries, Refuse, Maintenance, Snow Removal, and Construction Logistics Remain Unresolved A public facility does not function solely through pedestrian access. The Library will continue to require: 39 deliveries; • refuse collection; • landscaping services; • snow removal; • maintenance vehicles; • utility access; • event setup and breakdown; • equipment transport; and • occasional larger service vehicles. The application should identify where those vehicles will enter, stop, unload, turn, and exit. The Board should also determine: whether delivery vehicles will block parking or circulation; whether refuse containers are proposed and where they will be located; whether maintenance vehicles must enter the park area; how equipment will be brought to the amphitheater or gathering area; where snow will be stored; whether snow storage will reduce parking or narrow access; whether service operations will require use of the area adjoining Jewell; and whether any operation depends upon access that the Library characterizes as revocable. A plan that works only for ordinary passenger vehicles during ideal conditions is not a complete operational plan. G. Construction Access and Staging Have Not Been Meaningfully Addressed The proposed work appears to involve demolition, excavation, grading, wall construction, utility work, landscaping, and installation of permanent improvements. Those activities will require construction vehicles, equipment, material storage, worker parking, staging, and temporary access. The Board should require a construction-management or logistics plan identifying: construction access routes; equipment staging areas; material storage; worker parking; temporary fencing; protection of adjoining property; excavation limits; wall and fence footing locations; dewatering, if any; dust, noise, and vibration controls; hours of construction; maintenance of emergency access; maintenance of access to Jewell's property during construction; temporary drainage controls; and procedures for repairing any damage to adjoining pavement, structures, drainage, or access areas. Construction impacts cannot be dismissed as temporary where the work may interfere with the only practical route to adjoining parking or require excavation immediately adjacent to a property boundary or claimed access area. H. Grading and Drainage Effects Require More Complete Evaluation The project involves changes to the physical surface of the site and appears to include grading, retaining walls, drainage improvements, and landscaping. 40 These elements may alter the direction, volume, and concentration of stormwater flow. The Board should require plans showing: existing and proposed contours or spot elevations; drainage flow arrows; catch basins, drywells, inlets, pipes, or other facilities; wall heights; top and bottom elevations of walls; footing locations and depths; existing and proposed grade at the common boundary; treatment of runoff from paths, seating, roofs, or other improved surfaces; drainage during extreme storm events; overflow routes; erosion controls; maintenance responsibility; and confirmation that runoff will not be redirected toward Jewell's building, parking, foundation, entrances, or access areas. The cumulative effect of landscaping, fill, hardscape, walls, and drainage structures must be evaluated. Landscaping does not eliminate drainage impacts. Soil compaction, slope changes, concentrated discharge, and altered surface flow may create impacts even where overall impervious coverage appears limited. The Board should not approve the project subject merely to a generalized statement that drainage will be addressed later if the final drainage design may affect walls, grading, parking, circulation, or adjoining property. I. Structural Details May Materially Affect the Approved Layout Retaining walls, stairs, seating, fences, shade structures, sheds, curbs, and similar improvements have physical dimensions beyond the lines typically shown on a conceptual site plan. Footings may extend laterally. Walls may require drainage systems, excavation, reinforcement, guards, or setbacks. Gates require posts, hardware, and swing clearances. Accessible routes may require slopes, landings, handrails, and edge protection. Those features may reduce available circulation space or move improvements closer to the property line than the plan suggests. The Board should therefore require sufficient dimensional and structural information to confirm that: all improvements can be constructed within the areas shown; footings will not extend into disputed or adjoining areas; wall drainage will not affect neighboring property; required guards, railings, or landings will not obstruct circulation; accessible-route requirements will not force material redesign; gate hardware and posts will not reduce clear width; foundations will not interfere with utilities or drainage; and construction will not require access or encroachment onto Jewell's property. 41 The Board need not approve final engineering details, but it must have reasonable assurance that the depicted layout is buildable without materially changing the features upon which approval is based. J. Utilities and Related Operational Impacts Must Be Adequately Depicted The application appears to contemplate site lighting and utility improvements. The record should identify: fixture locations; fixture heights; illumination levels; hours of operation; spillover at property lines; glare toward Jewell's building or parking; electrical-service routes; underground utility locations; utility cabinets, transformers, meters, or panels; trenching and excavation limits; irrigation systems, if any; water connections; drainage or sewer connections, if any; and maintenance access to utility facilities. These elements may affect circulation, landscaping, property boundaries, and adjoining uses. They should not be deferred where their eventual placement could alter the approved site plan. K. The Intensity and Operation of the Proposed Public Use Remain Insufficiently Defined The Board cannot fully evaluate parking, safety, noise, lighting, refuse, and neighborhood compatibility without understanding how the space will be used. The applicant should clarify: whether the space is intended for passive use, organized programming, or both; anticipated event frequency; maximum anticipated attendance; hours of operation; evening use; amplified sound; performances or presentations; children's programming; food or beverage service; temporary tents, stages, or equipment; supervision and security; restroom availability; cleanup procedures; refuse storage; and procedures for closing or limiting the space during private or Library- sponsored events. The presence of amphitheater-style seating and a designed gathering area suggests that the space may accommodate more than incidental passive use. The Board should review the project based upon its reasonably anticipated operation, not solely upon the least intensive possible use. L. The Record Does Not Adequately Address the Future Lawful Use of Jewell's Property 42 The planning consequences extend beyond present-day convenience. The parking serving the Jewell Property, together with the practical vehicular access and maneuvering necessary to reach and use that parking, may form part of the factual and regulatory foundation upon which the Property's present lawful use, occupancy, and municipal approvals depend. The access and parking at issue serve the commercial operations at 53795 Main Road, the second-floor residential premises at 53801 Main Road, rear building entrances, occupants and tenants, deliveries, service providers, refuse operations, and emergency response. The proposed impairment therefore may affect the continued lawful and practical operation of both the commercial and residential components of the Jewell Property. The Board should consider whether the proposed design would materially impair practical access, parking, loading, deliveries, emergency access, or other existing physical conditions relevant to the continued lawful use of the Jewell Property. To the extent the Town's existing permits, certificates of occupancy, variances, site-plan approvals, approved plans, or other municipal records depict, assume, rely upon, or require rear parking or vehicular access, approval of a neighboring site plan that materially impairs those conditions could diminish Jewell's ability to continue exercising rights and uses already associated with the Property. Such impairment may also affect the Jewell Property's ability to accommodate lawful changes in tenancy, occupancy, use, alteration, or redevelopment that otherwise would remain available under applicable zoning and existing municipal approvals. Jewell does not contend that any particular future approval or development proposal is guaranteed. The relevant concern is that the Board should not approve permanent improvements on adjoining property that unnecessarily eliminate physical conditions upon which the Jewell Property's existing lawful use, continued occupancy, and legally available future use may depend, without first evaluating those consequences. The Board should therefore review the Town's relevant records and determine: 1. whether existing approvals for the Jewell Property depict, assume, rely upon, or require rear parking or vehicular access; 2. whether the proposed redevelopment would impair continued compliance with any existing approval, authorized occupancy, or lawful use; 3. whether adequate practical access, circulation, loading, deliveries, accessibility, and emergency access would remain after construction; and 4. whether the proposed design would unnecessarily constrain lawful changes in use, occupancy, alteration, or redevelopment that would otherwise remain available to the Jewell Property. The Board need not adjudicate the existence or scope of any private easement to consider these consequences. It need only recognize that the permanent loss or material impairment of practical access and parking may affect not merely convenience, but existing municipal approvals, present lawful uses, and legally available future use of the Jewell Property. M. Material Issues Should Not Be Deferred to Post-Approval Review 43 A recurring concern is the possibility that essential details will be resolved later by the Building Department, Town Engineer, Fire Marshal, or staff. Coordination with those agencies is appropriate, but deferral has limits. A matter should not be postponed until after site-plan approval where its resolution may require material changes to: parking; circulation; access; fence alignment; gate width; wall location; grading; drainage; utility placement; accessible routes; emergency access; structures; or the relationship to adjoining property. The Board should decide the application presented, not approve a general concept whose feasibility depends upon future redesign. If later technical review may materially alter the plan, that review should occur before final approval or the revised plan should return to the Board. VIII. THE APPLICANT HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED THAT REASONABLE, LESS IMPACTFUL SITE CONFIGURATIONS WERE MEANINGFULLY EVALUATED One of the most significant omissions from the present application is the absence of any meaningful analysis of feasible alternative site layouts. Throughout these proceedings, the Library has proceeded from the implicit assumption that the proposed configuration is the only practical means of creating the desired public open space. The record, however, contains no analysis demonstrating that assumption. To the contrary, the existing conditions strongly suggest that the Library possesses considerable flexibility in the location and configuration of the proposed improvements. The Planning Board is not required to redesign the applicant's project. It may, however, require sufficient information to determine whether apparently feasible configurations could achieve substantially the same public objectives while avoiding or materially reducing the parking, circulation, engineering, safety, and adjoining-property impacts identified in the present design. That inquiry is directly relevant to whether the selected layout reflects sound and reasoned site planning. A. The Library's Expanded Property Holdings Provide Alternative Design Options The proposed redevelopment is concentrated immediately adjacent to Jewell, although the Library owns substantial property extending toward Traveler Street and has additional Main Road frontage created by its acquisition and demolition of the former post office building. 44 The record reflects that the Library's present site configuration did not arise solely from natural or fixed physical conditions. Rather, it is the product of successive acquisitions, conveyances, and demolitions undertaken over many years, including the conveyance of the parcel now occupied by North Fork Woodworking. Jewell does not challenge those decisions. They are relevant, however, because they demonstrate that the present planning constraints are not entirely inherent to the site. To the extent those discretionary decisions reduced the Library's flexibility in locating parking, circulation, or public improvements, the Board should not assume that impacts upon neighboring properties are unavoidable or permit those impacts to justify the unnecessary elimination of established parking and circulation where reasonable alternative designs may achieve the Library's objectives with fewer adverse effects. The Library should not be permitted to rely upon site constraints materially created or intensified by its own voluntary conveyances, demolitions, and property-planning decisions as justification for shifting avoidable parking, circulation, access, engineering, or safety impacts onto adjoining properties. The record does not explain why the principal gathering areas, amphitheater, landscaping, and pedestrian amenities must be located next to Jewell rather than farther west or toward Traveler Street, or why use of the Library's expanded frontage could not preserve more parking and circulation. No engineering, accessibility, utility, visibility, or operational analysis demonstrates that the selected location is necessary or that a less disruptive configuration would materially diminish the project's public benefit. B. The Traveler Street Alternative May Also Reduce Engineering, Drainage, and Safety Impacts The significance of these omissions is underscored by the existence of an apparent alternative location on the Library's Traveler Street frontage. Unlike the Main Road side of the property, the Traveler Street frontage does not appear to be constrained by the same terraced topography, cascading retaining wall system, or immediate proximity to adjoining commercial access corridors. The application contains no meaningful analysis comparing the engineering, drainage, circulation, or safety implications of locating the proposed public gathering facilities on the Traveler Street side of the property rather than immediately adjacent to the Jewell Property. Because the apparent availability of less impactful configurations bears directly upon site design, compatibility with adjoining properties, circulation, pedestrian safety, parking, and the reasonableness of the selected layout, the Board may properly require the applicant to explain whether reasonable alternative configurations were evaluated. To the extent environmental review applies, the availability of alternatives capable of avoiding or reducing identified impacts is likewise relevant to the Board's consideration of potential environmental consequences. C. The Board Should Require an Alternatives Analysis 45 Jewell is not requesting that the Planning Board prepare a new design for the applicant. Nor does Jewell contend that there is only one acceptable configuration. Rather, Jewell respectfully submits that the applicant should demonstrate that it considered the apparently feasible alternatives identified in the record and provide a rational planning explanation for the selected configuration. At a minimum, the Board should require the applicant to evaluate alternatives addressing: relocation of the principal gathering areas toward the Traveler Street portion of the property; preservation of substantially more existing parking; preservation of established vehicular circulation patterns; reduction of impacts upon adjoining properties; relocation of fencing and retaining walls farther from historically used circulation areas; redesign of pedestrian circulation to minimize conflicts with vehicular access; preservation of maneuvering space serving adjoining properties; and alternative grading and drainage designs that reduce impacts at the common boundary. Such an analysis need not be exhaustive. It should, however, demonstrate that the chosen design reflects reasoned planning rather than simply the first or preferred concept advanced by the applicant. D. Less Disruptive Alternatives Are Directly Relevant to the Board's Planning Responsibilities The existence of feasible alternatives does not mean the Board must reject the application. It does mean that the Board should understand whether the adverse impacts identified throughout this memorandum are unavoidable or are instead the product of discretionary design choices. That distinction is critical. If the impacts upon Jewell's property are unavoidable because no reasonable alternative exists, the Board may evaluate that circumstance accordingly. If, however, substantially similar public benefits can be achieved through a different site arrangement with materially fewer impacts upon neighboring property, parking, circulation, and future land use, then the Board should carefully consider whether approval of the present design is appropriate. The Planning Board's responsibility extends beyond determining whether a proposal is merely possible. It must determine whether the proposed layout represents sound planning. IX. THE APPLICATION FAILS TO ADEQUATELY ADDRESS ITS DEPARTURE FROM PRIOR PLANNING BOARD AND ZONING BOARD APPROVALS 46 A. Prior Municipal Proceedings Provide Important Planning Context for the Present Application The present application should not be reviewed in isolation. The proposed redevelopment represents the latest stage in the evolution of the Library property, which has previously been the subject of proceedings before the Planning Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals. Those proceedings provide important evidence concerning the parking resources, circulation conditions, access arrangements and site configuration presented to or considered by the Town at the time of the earlier municipal determinations. The existing parking and circulation conditions therefore should not be treated as though they arose upon vacant or functionally isolated land. The prior municipal record appears to reflect a planning context that included on-site parking, municipal parking, the documented Feather Hill parking authorization, land potentially available for additional parking, access from Traveler Street, a proposed turnaround and a physically integrated parking and circulation environment. The Board should identify the precise plans, resolutions, findings and conditions associated with those proceedings before determining the significance of any departure from that earlier framework. Because the complete prior Planning Board and Zoning Board record has not been included with the present application, the applicant should identify the prior approvals, including the approved plans, resolutions, variance materials, parking analyses, and conditions of approval relevant to the Property. Those materials are necessary to determine what factual assumptions underlay the earlier approvals and whether those assumptions remain valid today. In particular, the applicant should identify the 1989 Planning Board proceedings, the written authorization permitting Library patrons to utilize the Feather Hill parking lot, any contemporaneous parking analyses or requests for parking relief, the Zoning Board determinations concerning parking, and the approved plans and conditions forming part of those proceedings. Only by reviewing those materials can the Board determine the factual basis upon which the earlier municipal approvals rested. Although the Planning Board is not obligated to perpetuate every aspect of prior approvals indefinitely, neither should it disregard those approvals without first understanding why they existed and what planning objectives they were intended to serve. Planning decisions do not occur in a vacuum. Property owners, neighboring businesses, and the public reasonably rely upon longstanding municipal approvals and established site conditions when making investment, development, leasing, and operational decisions. While prior approvals do not freeze a property permanently, they provide important planning context that should not be disregarded without an understanding of the factual assumptions upon which they were based. Jewell has relied upon the longstanding parking, circulation, and access patterns associated with the adjoining properties in the operation and future planning of its Property. Accordingly, before approving a substantial departure from those longstanding conditions, the Board should 47 determine whether the planning assumptions underlying the earlier approvals remain valid and whether the proposed changes are necessary and supported by the present record. B. Material Assumptions Underlying the Earlier Approvals Have Changed The factual circumstances underlying the earlier Planning Board and Zoning Board approvals have materially changed. The 1989 Planning Board record did not conclude that the Library's on-site parking alone was adequate. Rather, the Board expressly recognized that the parking shown on the site plan was insufficient and proceeded in reliance upon several additional circumstances, including municipal parking across Main Road, the Library's written authorization to utilize the adjoining Feather Hill parking lot, the availability of Library-owned land for future code-compliant parking, and anticipated circulation improvements, including construction of a turnaround at the end of the existing parking area. Those circumstances appear from the municipal record to have formed an important part of the planning framework within which the contemporaneous Planning Board proceedings and Zoning Board parking relief were considered. Those underlying factual assumptions no longer remain valid. Most significantly, the written Feather Hill parking authorization considered during the 1989 proceedings has been expressly withdrawn and revoked by the current property owner. By letter dated July 21, 2026, Feather Hill advised the Planning Board that Library employees, patrons, invitees, contractors, and program attendees are not authorized to park on Feather Hill property and that no alleged historical use of that property may be treated as available, dedicated, overflow, substitute, or alternative parking for the Library. The former Feather Hill parking resource therefore cannot rationally be carried forward as part of the parking framework supporting the present application. Nor should the Board assume, without current information, that the broader traffic, parking, seasonal-use and operational conditions existing in 1989 or even in 2013 remain representative today. The age of the earlier determinations, together with the intervening changes in development, property ownership, site configuration and intended public use, warrants current parking and circulation information rather than automatic reliance upon historical assumptions. Traffic and congestion conditions in the center of Southold's commercial district have also changed materially since the Library's 1989 and 2013 proceedings. Main Road, also designated New York State Route 25, is the principal east-west roadway serving the North Fork and carries local residents, employees, commercial traffic, delivery and service vehicles, visitors, and substantial seasonal traffic through the narrow historic center of the Hamlet. Present conditions frequently involve sustained congestion, closely spaced and slow-moving vehicles, limited opportunities for safe turning, conflicts involving vehicles entering and exiting commercial properties, and recurring backups during peak daily and seasonal periods. Those conditions appear to have become particularly pronounced since the COVID-19 pandemic, with increased automobile-dependent travel, deliveries, tourism, restaurant and retail activity, seasonal occupancy, and year-round residency on the North Fork. These changes further support the need 48 for current traffic, parking, and circulation information rather than reliance upon assumptions developed during the 1989 or 2013 proceedings. The resulting risk is not limited to vehicle conflicts on Route 25. Every vehicle entering or leaving the shared access must cross the heavily used sidewalk on the north side of Main Road. That sidewalk links Feather Hill, the nearby bus stop, the pharmacy, the Library, and other businesses and public destinations in the commercial center. Increased congestion reduces the availability of safe gaps in highway traffic and may cause exiting vehicles to wait at the curb cut, while constrained internal circulation may cause entering vehicles to stop before fully clearing the sidewalk. The combination of increased pedestrian activity, highway congestion, restricted maneuvering space, and a narrow commercial driveway requires present-day analysis that was not performed in connection with the 1989 or 2013 proceedings. These changed conditions directly affect the present application. Vehicles entering or leaving the narrow shared access have fewer usable gaps in Main Road traffic; vehicles unable to turn within the rear circulation area may be forced to undertake backing or multi-point movements near Route 25; and motorists unable to locate parking may circulate through or occupy neighboring commercial properties. The proposed redevelopment would remove or constrain existing parking and maneuvering space while introducing additional programmed public activity and pedestrian use, including children's programming. The application contains no current traffic, congestion, pickup-and-drop-off, delivery, or circulation analysis demonstrating how those foreseeable consequences will be accommodated. The 1989 and 2013 municipal records therefore cannot be treated as establishing the adequacy of parking or circulation under present conditions. Even if the parking, turnaround, municipal- parking, and off-site-parking assumptions considered during those proceedings were reasonable at the time, the present proposal must be evaluated using current traffic conditions, current seasonal and peak-use patterns, current parking demand, and the actual movements of passenger, delivery, refuse, maintenance, and emergency vehicles. The relevant planning inquiry is therefore not whether the proposal might have functioned adequately under the traffic, parking, and operational conditions existing when the earlier parking relief was granted, but whether the proposed redevelopment is appropriate under the existing and reasonably foreseeable conditions affecting the commercial center of Southold today. Accordingly, before relying upon the earlier Planning Board or Zoning Board determinations, the Board should identify the factual assumptions underlying those approvals and determine whether those assumptions remain valid under present conditions. C. The Present Proposal Departs Materially From the Earlier Planning Framework The proposal would eliminate a significant portion of the existing parking field, alter longstanding circulation, replace vehicle areas with programmed open space, introduce 49 permanent structures and landscaping, and relocate pedestrian activity into areas previously used for vehicles. At the same time, it is intended to increase public programming without a current parking-demand analysis identifying employees, volunteers, patrons, peak attendance, special events, seasonal demand, or foreseeable future programming. The Board should evaluate both the net numerical loss of parking and the operational consequences for employees, patrons, programs, events, emergency access, deliveries, circulation, neighboring businesses, and the established relationship between the Library and Jewell properties. D. The Applicant Has Not Demonstrated Why the Previously Approved Planning Framework Should Be Abandoned Redevelopment may require change, but the applicant has not explained why parking, circulation, access, and other site functions reflected in the earlier municipal framework are no longer necessary or why their removal is appropriate under present conditions. The Board should require a rational, record-based explanation identifying the prior conditions, the material departures now proposed, and the planning basis for each departure. The separate question whether feasible alternative layouts could reduce those impacts is addressed in Section VIII. E. The Board Should Require a Direct Comparison Between Prior Approvals and the Present Proposal Before acting upon the application, the Board should require the applicant to submit a comprehensive comparison identifying: 1. parking shown on previously approved plans; 2. parking proposed to remain; 3. parking proposed to be eliminated; 4. changes in circulation patterns; 5. changes in access points; 6. changes in pedestrian movement; 7. changes in operational use; 8. changes in grading, drainage, and utilities; 9. changes affecting adjoining properties; 10. the planning rationale supporting each material departure from the prior approvals; and 11. a current parking demand analysis identifying, at a minimum, the number of employees, volunteers, average and peak patron attendance, anticipated attendance during Library programs and special events, seasonal demand, and reasonably foreseeable future programming, together with an analysis demonstrating that the proposed parking supply, circulation, loading, and accessible parking are adequate for those anticipated uses. Only after that information is provided can the Board determine whether the proposed redevelopment is rationally supported by the administrative record and represents sound planning under present conditions. X. THE PLANS SHOULD ACCURATELY DEPICT RECORDED PROPERTY INTERESTS AND LONGSTANDING PHYSICAL CONDITIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICING PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS 50 A. Accurate Depiction of Recorded Property Interests Is Not an Adjudication of Private Rights Throughout these proceedings, the parties have identified recorded easements, rights-of-way, longstanding circulation patterns, and other existing physical conditions that bear directly upon the proposed redevelopment. Those matters are relevant to planning review whether or not their ultimate legal significance remains disputed. The Planning Board is not asked to determine the ownership, scope, enforceability, abandonment, merger, relocation, or extinguishment of any private property interest. It is asked only to evaluate the proposed redevelopment based upon an accurate depiction of the existing physical conditions and recorded instruments that may affect the design, construction, operation, or future use of the site. Accurate plans are fundamental to meaningful site-plan review. A site plan should faithfully represent existing physical conditions and recorded property interests that may affect the design, construction, operation, or future use of the property. Doing so does not constitute a legal determination of ownership or enforceability. Rather, it provides the Board with the factual information necessary to understand the site that it is being asked to approve. Accurate depiction is not adjudication. The Library suggests that depicting disputed easements or circulation areas somehow requires the Planning Board to determine their legal validity. That is incorrect. Planning boards routinely review plans that identify: recorded easements; utility easements; drainage easements; rights-of-way; access easements; deed restrictions; survey exceptions; adjoining encroachments; and other recorded instruments. The depiction of those matters merely informs the Board of conditions that may affect the proposed development. Whether those interests are ultimately enforceable remains a question of law for a court of competent jurisdiction. The Board is not asked to decide that question. B. Recorded Interests and Longstanding Physical Conditions Should Be Shown Factually The plans should identify the location of recorded easements, rights-of-way, and other relevant instruments, while allowing the applicant to note any dispute concerning their interpretation or enforceability. The plans should also depict significant longstanding circulation patterns because they are existing physical conditions relevant to the project's impacts, irrespective of whether 51 they ultimately establish legal rights. Accurate depiction informs planning review; it does not adjudicate ownership or enforceability. C. The Approximately 41/2-Foot Area Should Be Depicted Factually Rather Than Characterized as a "License" At the July 13 hearing, counsel for the Library characterized the approximately 41/2-foot area shown on the plans as a revocable license and suggested that its continued availability depended upon whether litigation was pursued. The Board should not adopt that characterization. First, the approximately 41/2-foot area was already shown on the plans before the hearing. It was not newly added as an accommodation or concession in response to Jewell's concerns. Second, whether that area constitutes a license, an easement area, a component of a larger circulation system, or something else entirely presents legal questions beyond the jurisdiction of the Planning Board. The plans should therefore depict the area and its relationship to the proposed improvements accurately as an existing physical condition without adopting either party's disputed legal characterization. D. Any Approval Should Expressly Reserve All Private Property Rights To avoid future misunderstanding, any resolution approving the application should expressly state that: the Planning Board makes no determination concerning the existence, scope, ownership, abandonment, relocation, merger, extinguishment, or enforceability of any easement, right-of- way, license, or other private property interest; nothing shown upon the approved plans shall be construed as determining or prejudicing any private property claim; approval shall not be interpreted as recognizing or rejecting any asserted legal or equitable rights of any party; nothing contained in the approval shall impair the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to determine such matters in any future proceeding; and nothing contained in the approval shall impair or prejudice any legal or equitable claim or defense of any party. Such language protects the Library, Jewell, the Town, and future property owners alike. E. The Board Should Require Revised Plans Before Any Further Consideration of Approval Accordingly, before any further consideration of site-plan approval, the Board should require revised plans that: 52 1. accurately depict all recorded easements and rights-of-way affecting the property; 2. identify longstanding circulation patterns relevant to the proposed redevelopment; 3. refrain from adopting disputed legal characterizations of those areas; 4. clearly distinguish factual site conditions from legal conclusions; 5. identify all permanent improvements that may affect those areas; and 6. incorporate an express reservation that no approval determines or prejudices any private property rights. Requiring these revisions would not require the Board to determine any disputed issue of private property law. Rather, it would ensure that the Board evaluates the proposal based upon an accurate depiction of the existing physical conditions while expressly preserving all private property rights for determination, if necessary, by a court of competent jurisdiction. Such an approach permits the Board to fulfill its planning responsibilities without exceeding its jurisdiction. XI. APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION ON THE PRESENT RECORD WOULD BE PREMATURE AND INCONSISTENT WITH THE BOARD'S OBLIGATION TO ENSURE SOUND PLANNING The Board is not being asked to decide whether the Library may improve its property or whether public open space is beneficial. It is being asked whether this particular permanent redevelopment has been sufficiently documented and analyzed to support the affirmative findings required for site-plan approval. The applicant bears the burden of supplying competent factual, engineering, operational, parking, and circulation evidence; Jewell is not required to prove that an incompletely documented configuration will fail. On the present record, the necessary showing has not been made. The deficiencies concern the completed site's fundamental operation and cannot be cured by assuming that material questions will be resolved after approval. The proposal would install retaining walls, fences, pathways, gathering areas, landscaping, utilities, grading, drainage facilities, and other fixed improvements within or immediately adjacent to the historically used parking and circulation environment. Once constructed, those improvements may be costly or impracticable to relocate. The Board need not adjudicate the parties' private rights, but it should not rely upon an affirmative assumption that they do not exist or approve plans that purport to authorize interference with rights as they may be agreed upon or judicially determined. The Board should evaluate the plans actually submitted. Those plans remain materially the same as the concept presented to Jewell on February 12, 2025, notwithstanding Jewell's repeated concerns and suggested alternatives. The proj ect's civic purpose does not substitute for the same complete, objective review applicable to other substantial redevelopment. Careful supplementation and reasoned redesign would advance not obstruct the Library's objectives by reducing avoidable conflict and ensuring that any eventual public improvement rests upon a sound and durable planning record. 53 Accordingly, the application should be denied without prejudice on the present record or, alternatively, withheld from approval until the applicant submits the revised plans and supporting information identified below and the completed record is subjected to renewed review. XII. REQUESTED BOARD ACTION For the reasons set forth above, Jewell respectfully requests that the Planning Board deny the application without prejudice because the present record does not support the findings necessary for site-plan approval. Alternatively, the Board should withhold approval unless and until the applicant submits a materially revised plan and complete supporting record addressing the matters set forth below, followed by appropriate agency review and renewed public consideration. Jewell does not request that the Planning Board adjudicate private property rights, determine the legal existence or scope of any easement or right-of-way, or resolve matters reserved to a court of competent jurisdiction. Jewell instead requests that the Board exercise its site plan review authority to ensure that any determination is based upon an accurate and complete factual record, sound planning principles, appropriate engineering information, and a design that reasonably avoids or minimizes unnecessary impacts upon adjoining properties. The requests below are cumulative, not alternative. Each concerns a distinct deficiency in the present record and information reasonably necessary for the Board to complete its site-plan review under Town Law § 274-a and the Southold Town Code. Jewell further requests that, before final action, the Board identify on the record the regulatory basis and factual predicate for any Type II classification under SEQRA; nothing in that classification should be treated as diminishing the separate information, review and findings required for site-plan approval. Accordingly, Jewell respectfully requests that the Board require the applicant, at a minimum, to submit the following information and revised plans before any final determination is made. A. Existing and Proposed Site Conditions The application should not be deemed complete for final determination unless the revised plans and supporting narrative affirmatively identify, reconcile, and document the material existing conditions, historical approvals, recorded interests, and operational circumstances relevant to the proposed redevelopment. The revised site plans should accurately depict, identify, and distinguish: existing and proposed parking areas and parking-space counts; existing and proposed vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns; existing improvements proposed to remain, be altered, or be removed; all permanent improvements proposed to be constructed; existing and proposed grades and contours; excavation and limits of earth disturbance; drainage facilities and drainage patterns; utilities; retaining walls and other grade-support systems; fencing; lighting and its 54 potential effects upon surrounding buildings; structures; loading and service areas; building entrances; and all other site features reasonably necessary for meaningful site-plan review. To the extent reasonably necessary to evaluate the proposal's effects, the revised plans should also depict relevant existing conditions on immediately adjoining properties, including parking areas, access drives, circulation routes, retaining walls, grades, drainage patterns, building entrances, loading areas, utilities, fencing, and other physical improvements that directly interact with or may be affected by the proposed work. The applicant is not being asked to adjudicate disputed ownership, easement scope, or other private legal rights on adjoining property. It should, however, accurately depict record ownership boundaries, recorded instruments, and relevant existing physical conditions so that the Board can evaluate the physical and operational effects of the proposed development. B. Geotechnical, Structural, Grading, and Drainage Review The applicant should submit engineering information commensurate with the nature and extent of the proposed excavation, grading, retaining-wall work, drainage improvements, and other earth disturbance, including, as applicable: a geotechnical or soils investigation; a slope-stability analysis; an evaluation of groundwater and hydrostatic pressure; a stormwater and drainage analysis; an analysis of temporary and permanent excavation-support conditions; and a structural engineering analysis of the existing and proposed retaining-wall and terraced-grade systems. The analyses should demonstrate that the proposed work will not adversely affect the stability, integrity, drainage, or performance of the Library property, the adjoining Jewell property, or any physically interconnected retaining- wall, grading, or drainage systems. The submission should include a cut-and-fill calculation and earthwork schedule identifying the quantity and disposition of all excavated and imported material, together with excavation limits, depths, temporary support requirements, construction sequencing, dewatering measures, erosion and sediment controls, and construction-access routes. C. Parking Analysis The applicant should submit a comprehensive parking analysis identifying: the number and location of existing parking spaces; the number and location of parking spaces reflected in prior Planning Board and Zoning Board approvals; the number of spaces proposed to be eliminated; the number and location of replacement or newly created spaces; the resulting net change in parking supply; compliance with applicable parking requirements; the extent to which existing parking arrangements depend upon circulation or maneuvering areas affected by the proposal; and the anticipated parking demand generated by existing Library operations and the proposed public gathering, programming, and event uses. 55 The Board should evaluate the proposal based upon its net effect upon the existing and longstanding parking supply, rather than merely the number of newly striped or newly designated spaces. D. Vehicular Access and Circulation Analysis The applicant should demonstrate that the completed site will safely and practically accommodate all vehicles reasonably expected to use the property, including: passenger vehicles; • delivery vehicles; • refuse-collection vehicles; • maintenance vehicles; • landscaping equipment; • emergency vehicles; • snow-removal equipment; and • other service and commercial vehicles. The analysis should address ingress, internal circulation, loading, unloading, maneuvering, turnaround, emergency access, and egress after all proposed improvements, fencing, landscaping, gathering areas, retaining walls, and other permanent site features have been constructed. The submission should include: passenger-vehicle and commercial-vehicle turning templates; swept-path analyses; relevant aisle, driveway, gate, and turning-area dimensions; loading and service-vehicle maneuvering analyses; and a demonstration that delivery, refuse, maintenance, and emergency vehicles can operate without unsafe backing movements toward or onto Main Road, also known as New York State Route 25. The analysis should specifically depict and evaluate the existing curb cut and driveway apron on Main Road/NYS Route 25 through which the shared access serves the Jewell Property. It should demonstrate that passenger, delivery, service, refuse, maintenance, and emergency vehicles can enter and leave without stopping, queuing, or reversing across the public sidewalk; that entering vehicles can clear the sidewalk promptly; that exiting vehicles can approach the curb cut in a controlled forward movement; and that the proposed internal configuration preserves the practical and safe use of the existing curb cut. The analysis should also show whether two vehicles can pass where operationally necessary; whether each retained or proposed parking space can be independently entered and exited; whether vehicles can turn without using adjoining or disputed areas; and how the circulation system functions with vehicles occupying the proposed spaces, gate swings and hardware, posts, wall footings, curbs, landscaping at maturity, drainage structures, pedestrians, and snow accumulation. E. Pedestrian Circulation and Safety Analysis The applicant should submit a pedestrian circulation and safety analysis addressing the interaction between the proposed children's programming and other public activities and the existing vehicular and commercial operations on and adjacent to the site. 56 The analysis should evaluate, at a minimum: pedestrian routes and entrances; customer and visitor traffic; commercial deliveries; refuse collection; service and maintenance vehicles; emergency access; truck turning and backing movements; pedestrian-vehicle conflict points; visibility and sight-distance conditions; barriers, fencing, gates, and landscaping; accessibility; and reasonable alternative layouts that could reduce foreseeable pedestrian-vehicle conflicts. The analysis should include the public sidewalk crossing at the Main Road curb cut and address pedestrian movements between Feather Hill, the bus stop, the pharmacy, the Library, and other shops and destinations along the north side of Route 25. It should identify pedestrian approach directions and peak periods; available sight distance; potential obstructions caused by fences, gates, walls, landscaping, signs, parked vehicles, or structures; vehicle stopping, queuing, and backing movements; and measures necessary to prevent vehicles from blocking or reversing through the sidewalk crossing. F. NYSDOT Jurisdiction and Route 25 Access Determination Before final action, the applicant should provide a written determination from the New York- State Department of Transportation identifying the extent of NYSDOT jurisdiction over the existing Main Road/NYS Route 25 curb opening, driveway apron, drainage, pedestrian crossing, and related frontage conditions. The submission should include any required Highway Work Permit, commercial driveway/access permit, approval, comments, or conditions, or an express written determination from NYSDOT that no such permit or further approval is required. The material supplied to NYSDOT should include accurate existing- and proposed-conditions plans depicting: 1. the full curb-opening and driveway-apron width; 2. the State right-of-way line; 3. adjoining property lines; 4. recorded easements and rights-of-way; 5. existing and proposed pavement limits; 6. the approximately 41/2-foot area depicted on the plans; 7. fences, gates, posts, footings, walls, curbing, landscaping, utilities, and structures; 8. driveway grades and drainage; 9. sight-distance triangles; 10. sidewalk conditions and pedestrian movements; 11. vehicle turning, swept paths, queuing, and backing movements; and 12. the usable width and functional operation of the access from Route 25 through the rear parking and circulation area. Any NYSDOT response should be placed in the administrative record and provided to adjoining property owners and the public before final Planning Board action. 57 G. Ownership, Participation, and Accuracy of Submissions Concerning the Route 25 Access Before final action, the applicant should be required to submit a survey-based statement identifying: 1. the ownership of each portion of the driveway, driveway apron, curb-cut connection, and internal access area depicted or affected by the application; 2. the portion owned by Jewell; 3. the portion owned by the Library; 4. all recorded easements, rights-of-way, reciprocal access strips, licenses, or other instruments asserted to affect those areas; 5. the limits of the State right-of-way; 6. the existing pavement and historically traveled areas; and 7. every proposed improvement that may alter the width, configuration, visibility, drainage, alignment, or operation of the access. The applicant should identify every application, referral, representation, or submission made to the Planning Board,NYSDOT, the Building Department, the Town Engineer, or any other reviewing agency concerning the Route 25 curb opening or driveway and place copies of those materials in the administrative record. Because Jewell owns part of the driveway served by the curb cut and relies upon that access for its property, no approval should be based upon a representation that the Library owns or controls the entire access. Nor should any approval purport to authorize construction upon, alteration of, restriction of, or interference with land owned by Jewell or with private rights the Library has not established it lawfully controls. If any proposed work or any finding necessary for approval depends upon the use, alteration, narrowing, obstruction, relocation, maintenance, or control of property owned by Jewell, the applicant should either obtain Jewell's written consent or revise the application to demonstrate that the project can be constructed and operated entirely without unauthorized use of or interference with Jewell's property. Jewell should receive copies of any materially revised submission concerning the curb cut or driveway and should be afforded a meaningful opportunity to respond before the Board takes final action. H. Operational Analysis The applicant should submit an operational narrative describing: the anticipated nature and operation of the proposed public gathering area or park; • proposed programming and events; anticipated occupancy and frequency of use; hours of operation; 58 lighting; maintenance; refuse storage and collection; security; emergency access; deliveries and servicing; event setup and breakdown; snow removal; and other operational characteristics relevant to site plan review. The operational narrative should be sufficiently specific to permit the Board to evaluate whether the physical site design can safely and practically accommodate the proposed uses. I. Alternatives Analysis The applicant should submit a comparative site-planning analysis addressing whether the principal objectives of the redevelopment can reasonably be achieved through alternative layouts that would: preserve more of the existing parking supply; preserve established circulation and maneuvering patterns; reduce excavation, grading, and retaining-wall work; reduce drainage and structural impacts; reduce conflicts with adjoining commercial operations; relocate principal gathering or programming areas farther toward the Traveler Street portion of the Library property or another less impactful location; provide greater separation from Jewell's property; and otherwise avoid or minimize unnecessary adverse impacts while accomplishing the Library's legitimate planning objectives. The alternatives analysis should specifically evaluate the feasibility of locating the proposed public gathering facilities on or nearer the Traveler Street frontage or in another location that would reduce the impacts identified in this proceeding. Jewell does not request that the Board redesign the project. The Board should, however, determine whether the selected layout creates material impacts that could reasonably be avoided or reduced through a feasible alternative design. J. SEQRA Classification and Independent Site-Plan Review Before taking final action, the Board should identify the particular provision of 6 NYCRR 617.5 supporting any classification of the action as Type II and state the factual basis for determining that the coordinated redevelopment falls within that provision. The Board should require the applicant to quantify and depict the full extent of physical land disturbance, including the total area of grading and excavation; existing and proposed elevations; the volume and disposition of cut and fill; the amount of material to be imported, exported, or redistributed; maximum excavation depths; temporary and permanent excavation-support methods; dewatering, erosion, dust, vibration, and construction-truck impacts; and the relationship of the proposed earthwork to existing slopes, drainage systems, retaining walls, and adjoining properties. Before taking final action, the Board should: 59 1. identify the precise provision of 6 NYCRR 617.5, or any valid locally adopted Type II category, upon which it relies; 2. identify the entire action being classified, including all demolition, parking, circulation, grading, drainage, retaining-wall, utility, fencing, public-use, and operational components; 3. explain in writing how the coordinated action falls wholly within the identified Type II category; 4. determine whether any part of the project has been improperly separated from the classification of the whole action; 5. if the action is not Type II, classify it as Type I or Unlisted and complete the applicable environmental assessment and determination-of-significance process before approval; 6. identify and evaluate parking, traffic, circulation, pedestrian safety, adjoining-land-use, grading, drainage, retaining-wall, emergency-access, operational, and cumulative impacts; and 7. provide the public and adjoining property owners an opportunity to review and comment upon any EAF, supporting studies, determination of significance, or materially revised project submission before final action. If the Board determines that the action is Type II, its resolution should further make clear that the classification has not been treated as limiting the scope of review independently required under Town Law § 274-a and the Southold Town Code. Any resolution should contain findings addressing, upon the completed record, parking, circulation, pedestrian safety, emergency and service access, grading, drainage, retaining walls, operations, adjoining-property impacts and the material site-planning issues presented by the application. K. Prior Approvals The applicant should identify all relevant prior Planning Board and Zoning Board approvals affecting the property and explain any material departure from those approvals, including changes affecting: parking; the June 20, 1989 Feather Hill parking authorization and its express withdrawal, revocation, and termination by the current owner's July 21, 2026 letter; circulation; access; loading and service operations; site layout; grading and drainage; operational characteristics; and compatibility with adjoining properties. circulation; access; loading and service operations; site layout; grading or drainage; operational characteristics; and compatibility with adjoining properties. The applicant should identify all relevant prior Planning Board and Zoning Board approvals affecting the property and explain any material departure from those approvals, including changes affecting: parking; the June 20, 1989 Feather Hill parking authorization and its express withdrawal, revocation, and termination by the current owner's July 21, 2026 letter; circulation; access; 60 loading and service operations; site layout; grading and drainage; operational characteristics; and compatibility with adjoining properties. L. Affirmative Factual and Documentary Disclosure Before final action, the applicant should be required to submit a written factual and documentary statement addressing the material historical, physical, operational, and municipal-record issues relevant to the proposed redevelopment. For each matter, the applicant should identify its position, the factual basis for that position, and the survey, deed, recorded instrument, approved plan, municipal resolution, correspondence, meeting minutes, hearing record, construction drawing, technical report, or other document upon which it relies. If the applicant disputes a material factual assertion raised in the administrative record, it should identify the nature of the dispute and the documentary or technical basis for its contrary position. The applicant should not be permitted to leave material matters unaddressed while asking the Planning Board to approve permanent construction based upon assumptions concerning existing conditions, prior approvals, parking, circulation, property interests, project intensity, engineering conditions, or the availability of adjoining parking. Where the applicant disputes a factual assertion, it should identify the precise nature of the dispute and provide the documentary or technical basis for its contrary position. At a minimum, the applicant's submission should affirmatively address and document: 1. the location and practical width of the historically traveled access and circulation corridor, including the approximately fifteen-foot area described by Jewell; 2. the reciprocal approximately four-and-one-half-foot recorded strips and the resulting approximately nine-foot recorded driveway; 3. the historic development of the Main Road commercial block to the extent relevant to the origin and continued operation of the shared access, rear parking, loading, and circulation environment; 4. the commercial use at 53795 Main Road and the second-floor residential premises at 53801 Main Road; 5. the July 13, 1989 Planning Board recommendation and the factual parking and circulation assumptions reflected in that proceeding; 6. the June 20, 1989 letter transmitting written authorization for Library patrons to use the Feather Hill parking area; 7. the survey submitted to and endorsed by the Planning Board in connection with the 2013 resubdivision; 8. the approximately 4,491-square-foot conveyance intended to provide the Library additional access from Traveler Street to its existing parking area; 9. the Library's acquisition and demolition of the former post office or restaurant building and the residence or other improvements toward Traveler Street; 10. the Library's conveyance of the parcel now occupied by North Fork Woodworking and the effect of that conveyance upon the Library's present site-planning options; 61 11. the applicant's description of the project as an approximately $1 million capital improvement; 12. the status of the submitted plans as a permit set or construction-oriented submission; 13. the statement at the July 13, 2026 hearing that the site's topography presents a"good challenge"; 14. counsel's characterization of the approximately four-and-one-half-foot area as a revocable "license" and the factual and legal basis asserted for that characterization, without requesting that the Planning Board adjudicate the ultimate legal characterization of the area; 15. the anticipated children's programming, public events, gathering uses, attendance, hours, and operational intensity of the proposed facility; 16. the height, location, condition, and physical interrelationship of existing retaining walls, including walls reported to exceed twelve feet in height; 17. Library Board minutes and other Library records reflecting parking concerns or reliance upon neighboring parking resources; 18. whether and in what respects the plans presently before the Board differ materially from the concept presented to Jewell on February 12, 2025; 19. the July 21, 2026 express withdrawal and revocation of any prior Feather Hill parking permission, and the resulting present unavailability of Feather Hill parking for Library employees, patrons, invitees, contractors, program attendees, or project-related demand; and 20. any other historical approval, physical condition, recorded interest, operational circumstance, or municipal record upon which the applicant relies in support of approval. Requiring the applicant to address these matters would not compel it to concede disputed private rights or require the Planning Board to adjudicate them. It would require only that the applicant disclose the factual and documentary basis upon which it asks the Board to approve permanent improvements and permit the Board, adjoining property owners, reviewing agencies, and the public to understand which material facts are agreed upon, which are disputed, and what evidence supports each position. M. Recorded Property Interests and Existing Physical Conditions The revised plans should depict all recorded easements, rights-of-way, and other recorded property interests shown by the applicant's title materials or survey, together with longstanding physical access and circulation features relevant to site plan review. Any such depiction should expressly state that it is included for planning and informational purposes only and does not constitute a determination by the applicant or the Planning Board concerning the ownership, legal existence, validity, scope, abandonment, relocation, merger, extinguishment, or enforceability of any private property interest. N. Confirmation and Preservation of the Approved 41/2-Foot Configuration 62 Before final action, the applicant should be required to state unequivocally whether the approximately 41/2-foot area depicted on the submitted plans will remain part of the final constructed and operational site configuration. If the applicant intends to withdraw, eliminate, narrow, obstruct, fence, gate, relocate, or otherwise restrict that area, it should submit revised plans depicting the actual proposed condition before any approval is granted. Those revised plans should be accompanied by updated parking, circulation, swept-path, commercial-vehicle, pedestrian-safety, emergency-access, fencing, Route 25 access, and adjoining-property analyses. The revised application should be returned to the Planning Board for appropriate agency review and renewed public consideration. If the Board approves the application in reliance upon the continued availability of the approximately 41/2-foot area depicted on the plans, the approval resolution should provide: The approximately 41/2-foot area depicted on the approved site plan shall be constructed and maintained in the location, dimensions, and unobstructed physical configuration shown on the approved plans. No fence, gate, post, footing, landscaping, structure, curb, wall, bollard, or other obstruction shall be installed within or so close to that area as to reduce its approved functional width or materially impair the parking, access, circulation, turning, sidewalk-crossing, Route 25 curb-cut, vehicle-storage, or emergency-access conditions upon which approval is based. The approved configuration shall preserve sufficient clear internal width and storage distance beyond the Main Road sidewalk to permit entering vehicles to clear Route 25 and the sidewalk fully and to prevent vehicles from stopping, queuing, or reversing across the pedestrian crossing. Any proposed withdrawal, elimination, narrowing, relocation, obstruction, or material restriction of that area shall constitute a material site-plan amendment requiring prior Planning Board and, where applicable, NYSDOT review following submission of revised plans and supporting analyses. This condition concerns preservation of the physical configuration upon which the Board's site- plan findings are based and does not determine the ownership, legal status, scope, or enforceability of any private property right. Nothing in the condition authorizes the Library to construct upon, alter, obstruct, control, or exercise rights over any portion of the driveway or access area owned by Jewell. Any proposed revision affecting Jewell-owned property must be supported by Jewell's written consent or other lawful authority, in addition to any required Planning Board or NYSDOT review. O. Reservation of Private Rights Any approval resolution should expressly provide that: 1. the Planning Board makes no determination concerning the ownership, existence, validity, scope, abandonment, relocation, merger, extinguishment, or enforceability of any easement, right-of-way, license, or other private property interest; 63 2. neither the approved plans nor the approval resolution adjudicates, prejudices, enlarges, diminishes, or otherwise determines any private property right; 3. the approval is subject to private rights as they may exist by agreement, recorded instrument, or judicial determination and does not authorize entry upon, construction upon, or interference with property or rights not owned or lawfully controlled by the applicant; 4. all affected parties retain every legal and equitable claim, defense, right, and remedy otherwise available under applicable law; and 5. no approval authorizes the applicant to construct upon, alter, occupy, restrict, obstruct, maintain, or exercise control over any portion of the driveway or access area owned by Jewell without Jewell's written consent or other lawful authority. Nothing in this reservation of private rights authorizes the applicant to materially alter the physical configuration approved by the Planning Board. The reservation of private rights should not be used to approve a plan that affirmatively depends upon the applicant's use or control of property it does not own. Where the feasibility, construction, or operation of the proposed plan depends upon property owned by Jewell, that issue must be resolved or the plan revised before approval. Any later withdrawal, obstruction, narrowing, relocation, fencing, gating, or elimination of an area upon which the approved parking, access, circulation, pedestrian-safety, or emergency-access findings depend shall require prior Planning Board review and approval of an amended site plan. P. Site Inspection Because several material issues presented by the application concern physical conditions that are not adequately conveyed by the submitted plans including the practical width and operation of the shared access corridor, the Route 25 curb cut, the public sidewalk crossing, pedestrian and vehicular conflict points, rear parking and maneuvering conditions, grade changes, retaining walls, drainage relationships, and the proximity of the proposed public gathering area to active commercial operations Jewell respectfully requests that the Planning Board conduct a publicly noticed site inspection before taking final action. The site inspection should include observation of the Main Road curb cut and sidewalk crossing, the shared access corridor, the rear parking and circulation areas, the relationship of the proposed improvements to Jewell's entrances and parking, the Feather Hill boundary, the retaining-wall and grade conditions, and the Traveler Street portion of the Library property identified as a potential alternative location. Any site inspection should be conducted solely to assist the Board in understanding the physical setting and should not substitute for the applicant's obligation to provide accurate surveys, dimensioned plans, engineering analyses, traffic and pedestrian studies, and a complete administrative record. Any material observations relied upon by the Board should be identified on the record so that the parties and public have an opportunity to address them. 64 Q. Continued Review and Public Consideration After the foregoing information and any materially revised plans have been submitted, the Board should continue or reopen its review as necessary to permit its consultants, interested agencies, adjoining property owners, and the public a meaningful opportunity to evaluate and comment upon the completed application before any final determination is made. The completed submission should be referred for written review, as applicable, by NYSDOT, the Town Engineer, the Building Department, the Fire Marshal or responsible fire-safety official, appropriate highway or traffic personnel, and any other agency having jurisdiction over access, drainage, retaining walls, accessibility, emergency response, or work affecting Main Road/NYS Route 25. Any subsequent revision materially affecting parking, access, circulation, fence or gate alignment, retaining walls, grading, drainage, pedestrian routes, emergency access, structures, or adjoining-property impacts should be returned to the Planning Board for further review and, where required, renewed public comment rather than approved administratively. Jewell further requests that any final determination include specific written findings addressing, at a minimum: the adequacy of the existing and proposed parking supply; vehicular access, circulation, loading, and emergency access; pedestrian circulation and safety; grading, excavation, retaining-wall, structural, and drainage impacts; the physical and operational effects upon adjoining properties; consistency with prior approvals; the feasibility of reasonable alternative layouts; the effect of the proposal upon longstanding physical access and circulation conditions; and the mitigation measures and approval conditions necessary to avoid or minimize identified impacts. If the Board determines to approve the application notwithstanding any unresolved deficiency identified above, Jewell respectfully requests that the Board state, in its written resolution, the factual and legal basis upon which it determined that the record was nevertheless sufficient and that the applicable site plan and environmental review standards were satisfied. Jewell raises each of the foregoing factual, procedural, site-planning, engineering, parking, circulation, safety, and SEQRA issues so that the Board may address them upon a complete administrative record before final action. Approval without a rational, evidence-based determination addressing those material issues would present questions whether the determination was affected by an error of law, arbitrary and capricious, unsupported by the administrative record, or made without the review and findings required by applicable law. Jewell expressly preserves its right to seek timely judicial review of any final determination and separately reserves all private legal and equitable claims, defenses, and remedies. 65 CONCLUSION The record demonstrates that this application is not a minor landscaping proposal or an administrative lot merger. It is a substantial and permanent redevelopment that would remove established parking and circulation areas, alter the physical access environment serving adjoining commercial property, and introduce public gathering, pedestrian, structural, grading, drainage, fencing, and operational components whose combined effects have not been adequately analyzed. The carefully documented history matters. The Main Road commercial properties developed around a shared practical access corridor along the common boundary between the Jewell Property and the adjoining Library parcel, rear parking and maneuvering areas, and interconnected circulation extending toward Traveler Street. The Library's later acquisitions and demolitions gave it substantially expanded access and design flexibility; they did not erase the historic circulation condition. The Town's own records confirm that earlier approvals considered insufficient on-site parking, municipal and Feather Hill parking resources, a turnaround, access to existing parking, and, in 2013, an endorsed survey depicting a gravel parking area straddling the Jewell-Library boundary. The present application removes or constrains portions of that documented parking and circulation environment without a reliable existing-versus-proposed parking analysis, turning and swept-path analysis, commercial-truck and service-access evaluation, pedestrian and emergency review, complete grading and drainage design, geotechnical and retaining-wall support, defined operational program, or meaningful alternatives analysis. Those are not collateral private-law disputes. They are ordinary and essential site-plan issues. A publicly noticed site inspection would further assist the Board in understanding the physical conditions and operational relationships that the present plans do not adequately depict. The application also fails to depict or analyze the surrounding properties and existing circulation environment with sufficient detail to permit the Board to evaluate the proposal's impact upon neighboring parcels and the existing commercial district as required by applicable site plan review standards. Because the applicant has not supplied the information or design necessary for the Board to make the required findings, Jewell respectfully requests denial of the application without prejudice on the present record. Such a denial would not adjudicate private rights and would not bar the Library from pursuing a materially revised project that preserves adequate access and circulation, provides appropriate parking and engineering support, and minimizes avoidable impacts upon adjoining property. In the alternative, the Board should withhold any approval, require a revised and complete submission addressing the deficiencies identified herein, and reopen the matter for full public review. 66 The public benefit associated with the Library's objectives does not justify diminished scrutiny. Sound planning requires that any eventual project serve the community without unnecessarily sacrificing established access, parking, safety, and the orderly continued use of neighboring property. Dated: Southold, New York July 22, 2026 Respectfully submitted, BISCHOFF LAW PLLC By: Joan H. Bischoff van Heemskerck, Esq. Attorney for Jewell on Main, LLC 67 u l=+ 2-1 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING 8 OARD Follow-Up Letter to Southold Town Planning Board 2245 MCR LLC / FEATHER HILL VILLAGE 53345 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Feathrliillilla,go@g ,ail.co 631-780-2851 July 21, 2026 Southold"Town Planning Board c/o Jessica M. Southold Town lull Annex 54375 NYS Route 25, 2nd Floor Southold, NY 11971 Email: lessicaM@southoldtownny.gov Re: Strong opposition to Amended Site Plan.for Southold.Free Library Packet Park- SCTM# 1000-61.4-15. . 15.5 Follow-Up to Previous Correspondence Lear Members of the Southold Town Planning Beard, We are writing as a fallow-up to our previous letter regarding the proposed merger of lots SCTM# 1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 and the development of the pocket park adjacent to our Feather Hill Shopping Center. We remain deeply concerned about the significant negative impacts this project will have on our property and all of our tenants if approved without substantial additional parking. Since ,acquiring the property in 201.4,the parking by library patrons in our shopping center has been a persistent,and worsening problem.What was already a challenge has become increasingly detrimental over the past twelve years. Parking in our center is frequently at capacity, and the spillover from the library severely disrupts our tenants' businesses and their customers. The previous owner of Feather Mill Shopping Center had even expressed to us his intention to install a fence along the eastern boundary adjacent to the Southold Library property specifically to mitigate this ongoing parking encroachment.You can imagine how much worse the situation has become more than a decade later.We have seriously considered this option ourselves but have held off in hopes of a more collaborative resolution. Approving the lot merger and pocket park without mandating a significant increase in dedicated library parking will only exacerbate these issues.The additional community space, amphitheater, ,and gathering areas will attract even more visitors,placing unsustainable pressure on our already strained parking resources. We strongly urge the Planning Board to deny the lot merger or, at minimum, condition approval on the inclusion of substantially more on-site parking for the library. Without this, the project will cause ongoing harm to our commercial property, the businesses that rely on adequate parking, and our neighbors. For the avoidance of any doubt, 2245 MCR LLC,as the current owner of Feather Hill Shopping Center, does not authorize or permit the Southold Free Library, its employees, patrons, invitees, contractors., or program attendees to park vehicles on the Feather Hill property. To the extent that any prior owner may previously have granted, represented, tolerated, or implied any permission for such parking,whether orally, in writing, by acquiescence, or otherwise, any such permission is hereby expressly withdrawn and revoked, effective immediately. This statement is not an admission that any enforceable agreement, easement, license, or other continuing right ever existed, and 2245 MCR LLC expressly reserves all rights and remedies concerning unauthorized use of its property. The Planning Board should not consider the privately owned Feather Hill Shopping Center parking areas, or any alleged historic use thereof by Library employees, patrons, invitees, Library A contractors, or program attendees, as available, dedicated, overflow, or substitute parking for the Library in evaluating this application. The adequacy of parking for the proposed development should be assessed solely an the basis of lawful parking facilities located on property owned, controlled, or otherwise legally available to the Library through a presently valid and enforceable recorded right or written agreement.Any past permissive use of Feather Hill property,to the extent it ever existed, was revocable, has been expressly terminated, and cannot property be relied upon to satisfy the Library's present or future parking needs or to support approval of this application. We appreciate your attention to this matter and respectfully request that our concerns be given full consideration before any final decision is made. We are available to provide further documentation or discuss potential solutions. Thank you for your time and service to the Southold community. Sincerely, Marcello, Ralph, and Alex Pica 2245 MCR LLC, Feather Hill Village 631-780-2851 Featherhillvillage@gmail.com Katie Wallace 2075 Pine Deck Road Southold, DIY 1171 katie.schmidt mail.com 617-512-2075 July 22, 2026 I L Jim Rich s "H 0[A RD Chair, Southold Town Planning BoardY Southold Town Mee: Letter of support for Southold Free Library Pocket Park Dear chairperson Rich and Members of the Town Planning Board, 0 1 am writing to express my support of the Southold Free Library's Pocket Park project, which is currently under consideration by the Town Planning Committee. As a resident of Southold, a Trustee for the Southold Free Library, and a parent to two daughters who are students at Southold Elementary, I believe this project is urgently necessary and will significantly improve the quality of life for our community. As a parent, I see the need for more safe, non-commercial, outdoor spaces where our children can gather. outside of the school playground and outdoor facilities - which are often in-use for after-school programs and sports - the library is the only free location in the downtown Southold area that accommodates families. With Pocket Park, parents will have a safe, welcoming outdoor space to bring their children to explore and play. In an age when so much of children's lives revolves around screens, creating inviting public spaces where families can gather together is more important than ever. The library also desperately needs the space to accommodate their popular summer programs. Currently, outdoor summer programs are held under a tent in the current pocket park. This location is small and tucked behind an unused parking lot. The summer programs are often wait-listed, and with more space, the library can better accommodate more robust programs for more Southold families. Instead of,asphalt, we will have a vibrant space for recreation, education, and connection. In a town like Southold, where preserving community character is so important, this project strengthens what makes Southold so special. Pocket Park will bring an appealing, outdoor community space to Main Road that celebrates the connection to nature and the connection to each other that is so uniquely Southold. This project is about more than just the library, it's about enriching the quality of life for our entire Southold community. I respectively encourage the Planning Board to approve the project application with haste so our community has the opportunity to enjoy the new Pocket Park by next summer. Thank you for your consideration and for your continued service for the residents of Southold. Sincerely, Katie Wallace From: Gail LaForce <gefaforce@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday,July 21, 2026 6:57 PMI ����� To: Michaelis,Jessica Subject: Southold Library Outdoor Space Z � 20,26 dLd TOWN BOARD I am writing in support of the Southold Library., which has spent four years creating a beautiful, privately funded outdoor space to host summer activities and offer the community a lovely sitting area. I understand that this was ready for approval but for an objection to the moving of the employee parking lot from Main Street to Travelers. I understand that two owners of the local shops are objecting on the basis that they will lose their free access to library parking. I am writing as a longtime resident of Southold to ask that you approve the plan which enhances the property and provides an open green space to for the community to enjoy. This is something that should outweigh the desires of neighboring landowners to usurp this public benefit for their own personal use and profit. Thank you for your time and consideration of this important matter. Sent from my Wad ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. llI Illlllll 1111 1111 MINIM III IIIIIIII From: Susan Honig <honigp@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday,July 21, 2026 5:47 PM �0WIFMI q) To: Michaelis, Jessica; Lanza, Heather Cc: Susan Honig J,tJ 01 Subject: Attn Jim Rich--Southold Library outdoor space SOUTH OLD TOWN Dear Mr. Rich, I'm writing in support of the Southold Library, a consistently community-centric institution. The Library has spent 4 years designing a beautiful, privately funded outdoor space to host summer programs and offer the community a lovely sitting area. The plans were ready for approval, but two owners of local shops have objected to the proposal to move employee parking from Main Street to Travelers Street. Their objection is based on their anticipated loss of free access to library parking. I'm writing as a long-time property owner in Southold, who uses the Library and its facilities often, to ask that you approve the plan as proposed by the library. The property, which has looked somewhat down at the heels for a long time, will be significantly enhanced and will provide an open green space to the community. It's inconceivable that the plan could be blocked by neighboring building owners who claim they should be able to occupy the Library's property for personal use to enhance their profits. The land doesn't belong to them, it belongs to the Library and, by extension, to the public. Honestly, I'm shocked they've been allowed to get away with this. There is free Town parking across the street from their building, in addition to free parking on Main Street itself and on side streets. The Library plan will benefit all. I urge you to act in the public interest and approve their application. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Susan Honig ATTENTION:This email came from an external.source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. .............. From: Peter Honig <honigpk@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2026 7:47 PM JUL Z To: Michaelis,Jessica; Lanza, Heather SOUTHOLD TOWN Cc: Peter Honig PLANNING BOARD L Subject: Support for Southold Public Library: A Neighborhood Treasure, Dear Mr. Rich, I'm writing in support of the Southold Library and the Libary's interest a beautiful, privately funded outdoor space to host summer programs and offer the community a lovely sitting area adjacent to their current footprint and on land currently owned by the Library. The plans were ready for approval, but two owners of local shops have objected to the proposal to move employee parking from Main Street to Travelers Street. Their objection is based on their anticipated loss of free access to library parking. The public space would not only beautify and improve the function of the current property but also enhance the quality of life for Southold residents. It's inconceivable that the plan could be blocked by neighboring building owners who claim they should be able to occupy the Library's property for personal use to enhance their profits. The land doesn't belong to them, it belongs to the Library and, by extension, to the public. Honestly, I'm shocked they've been allowed to get away with this. There is free Town parking across the street from their building, in addition to free parking on Main Street itself and on side streets. We utilize the Library and, as many others, benefit from their community spirit and offerings for seniors, adults and children. I urge you to act in the public interest and approve their application and deny the frivolous and unjustified objections to the plan. Thank you for acting in the public interest., Peter Honig ATTENTION:This email.came from an externat source. Do not open attachments or click on Links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. From: miminc53@aal.com IN Will 111,I Sent: Tuesday,July 21, 2026 8:50 PM To: Michaelis,Jessica JUL 2 � 20Z6 Subject: [SPAM] - Southold library outdoor space sau-rHoLo TuWN PLANNING BOARD I am writing in support of SOuthold`s library, which has spent 4 years planning to create a beautiful ,privately funded outdoor space to host summer activities and offer the community a lovely sitting area. I understand that this was ready for approval but for an objection to the moving of the employee parking lot from Main Street to Travelers. The 2 owners of the local shops are objecting on the basis that they will lose free access to library parking. As a long time resident of Southold, I request that you approve the plan which enhances the property and provides an open green space for the community to enjoy. This plan is something that should outweigh the desires of neighboring landowners personal needs for personal use and profit. Thank you for your consideration of this important community matter. Maureen Ringold ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. From: Michaelis, Jessica Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2026 1:51 PM To: Westermann, Caitlin Subject: FW: Attn:Jim Rich- Southold Library Outdoor Space 5'b� JUL 2 1 2026 Jessica Michaelis PLLAUNNI BOLD OARD Planning Board Secretary Southold Town Planning Department 54375 NYS Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: 631-765-1938 Email: ieI s aVlC,southoldtownny.gov From:A Katsavos<bookchats@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday,July 21, 2026 1:28 PM To: Michaelis, Jessica <jessica.michaelis@town.southold.ny.us>; Lanza, Heather<heather.lanza@town.southold.ny.us> Subject:Attn:Jim Rich-Southold Library Outdoor Space To: Jim Rich I am writing in support of the Southold Library which has spent four years creating a beautiful privately funded outdoor space to host summer programs and offer the community a lovely sitting area. I am a 17 year resident of Southold who was so looking forward to the completion of this project. I understand that just before the final approval there was an objection to the moving of the employee parking lot from Main Street to Travelers. I understand that two owners of the local shops are objecting on the basis that they will lose their free access to library parking--a blatant disregard for the community in the name of personal gain. I ask that you approve the plan which definitely outweighs the desires of greedy neighboring landowners to usurp this public benefit for their own personal use and profits. Thank you for consideration in this matter. Anna Katsavos i From: Liz Burns <burnsliz0820@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,July 20, 2026 10:13 AMF,61� �L-03 C r t4t � To: Westermann Caitlin Cc: Caroline MacArthur Subject: Library Pocket Park 10I71111117ri SOUTHOLO TOWN RLA IM WARD Bear Jim Bich and Members of the Southold Town Planning Board ,rw., My name is Elizabeth Burns, and 1 live on Town Harbor Lane in Southold. I am writing to express my strong support for the library's proposed Pocket Park project. I believe the library's thoughtful and well-designed plans will transform the area into an attractive and welcoming space that not only provides much-needed outdoor programming opportunities for the library but also enhances Southold Village for the benefit of all residents. As public libraries continue to evolve, creating inviting community spaces where people can gather, learn, and connect has become an important part of their mission.This project fulfills that mission exceptionally well while making productive use of an overlooked area. I also appreciate that the project is being funded through a bequest rather than taxpayer dollars, making it an even greater benefit to the community. I encourage you to support the library's proposal and look forward to seeing this wonderful addition become a reality., Sincerely, Elizabeth Burns ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Cho not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. � From: marnan�vaden <mev den@gmui|zom^ ��"�� Sent: Thursday,July 16,20261:31 pm L +f To: Michaelis,Jessica;Lanzo, Heather Subject: Attn:Jim Rich-Southold Library Outdoor Space To: Jim Rich P�!NWIG BOARD | hope this finds you well. | GrO writing in support Dfthe SouthD[d Library which has spent four years creating a beautiful privately funded outdoor space[o host summer programs and offer the community a [DVek/sitting area. | uOdD[st2Dd that this was ready for approval but for an objection to the moving of the empLoyee parking lot from Main Street tDTraVeLe(s. | understand that two owners of the Local shops are objecting on the basis that they wilt lose their free access tD Library parking. I am writing as a longtime resident of Southold to ask that you approve the plan which enhances the property and provides an open green space to the community.This is something that should outweigh the desires of neighboring Landowners to usurp this public benefit for their own personal use and profits. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on Links from unknown senders Or unexpected ernoiio' 1 S,ibP B, HL I GC1 mc,J N SOUTHOLD 7nPLANNING OWN ,A D July 14, 2026 Dear Planning Board Members, Thank you for your time and attention to reviewing the site plans for the proposed pocket park being submitted by the Southold Free Library. Recently, objections to this plan have been raised by the owners of the neighboring building. Although we had invited them to review the plan over 18 months ago,they did not bring to our attention an issue with THEIR parking until the day of the original hearing in June. The following issues have arisen because of their objections: 1. The site plan for the proposed pocket park is situated solely on property owned by the Southold Free Library (SFL). The area in question is an unsightly employee parking lot which we are endeavoring to use as part of a children's activity section. There are currently five spaces designated for library employee parking only. Even the Trustees do not use these spaces for business or personal visits to the library. 2. Currently we run a summer children's program in an area just north of this unsightly parking lot. It currently hosts on average 10-15 children in a class per day in scheduled classes. At most,there might be 40 for a specific program. At no time do arents cure fivers utilize the aarkinry area for a dro off1pick up or arken We do not expect the usage of the area to increase with the new park. Having any cars in that area would present a danger to the young participants. 3. In the past four years, the SFL board, staff and landscape architects looked at moving this children's play area to closer to the book cottage. This idea was not feasible because of the proximity to the new parking lot that will be placed from the book cottage to Travelers Street. Also, there were issues with septic tanks and traffic to and from the book cottage. 4. The entrance to the SFL will continue to remain in the middle of the property between Main St and Travelers St. Anyone attending the children's programs may park on Main Street and walk directly into the new shaded play area. Currently, they park on the street or in our parking lot and must walk around the building to enter this area. The plan calls for creating ADA compliant walkways between the upper parking lots (there will be two) and the new play area. S. The Amphitheatre is a creative way to utilize the space being created by the walkways. The primary purpose of this new area is to create seating for parents/caregivers to remain while their young children are attending summer classes. We do not intend to hire Taylor Swift to sing at our amphitheater so there should not be a need for high end stereo equipment and other such equipment. If a concert or lecture should take place in 53705 Main Road • PO Box 697 • Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-2077 • southoldlibrary.org 00 m� ... A L this area, it would be along the lines of those held in Silversmith's Corner Park where no designated parking is currently in place. 6. The SFL generously offered months ago to widen the right of way to allow large trucks to reach the back of the property owned by our neighbors. Currently they have three parking spaces behind their establishment. 7. The SFL has of their own choosing agreed to add additional parking spaces along Travelers Street. 8. This project is being financed by a generous bequest from Maureen Ostermann and a grant of$250,000 from DASNY. If there continues to be delays, we may not be able to collect on the DASNY grant. 9. We are creating a sustainable green space that will conform to ADA and environmental restrictions. Our goal is to offer an open space to the Southold community to thank them for their ongoing support of the Southold Free Library, its programs and staff. 10. It is disappointing to us that a neighboring entity is asking us to cut back on a much needed project for their own personal profit and benefit. The costs of four years of tannin are irreversible and wilU e Uost if this dela continues. 11. The SFL is a small building with limited space. The number of toddlers, pre-teens, teens and seniors who utilize our space is overwhelming. The library represents a safe place for students to come after school is let out. 12. The current parking spaces closest to the library entrance will be used as handicapped parking. This allows for those patrons to easily access the building. 13. There is ample street parking for the neighboring business to serve their patrons and resident in their apartment. They can still maintain the three current parking spaces that they have. 14. Although the SFL once had a written agreement with the previous owners of Feather Hill to allow library patrons to park in their lot, that was not carried over by the new owners. It is with this in mind that we are creating more parking along Travelers and asking that the SFL not be forced to cede its own property to a privately held business in town for their personal use. Our hope is that the Planning Board will agree that this is a much needed and thoughtful project that will benefit all the residents of the Southold community. The library serves every person from birth to seniors and never discriminates based on race, religion, citizenship and economics. This project is being privately funded. Sincerely, The Board of Trustees 53705 Main Road • PO Box 697 • Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-2077 # southoldlibrary.org e., OFFICELOCATION: HX �ts MAILINGADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1.179 rL � 543 " 5 at t, Southold, N 11971 car. Main Rd. &YoungsAve.) �u Telephone: 631 765-1938 Southold', NY w-w•w.southoldtow~nny.gov eom r( ,m PLANNING BOA-RD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 14, 2025 Mr. Eric Martz P.O. Box 894 Mattituck, NY 11952 Rey Public Hearing Southold Free Library Parking Site Plan 53705 & 53745 Main Road, Southold SCTM#1000-01.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Dear Mr. Martz: A Public Hearing was held by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 13, 2026 regarding the above-referenced application. The Public Hearing was closed, and held open for written comments until July 23, 20204. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. esp �ctfuIly, James H. Rich III Chairman M Nicholas J. Planamento, member Jewell on Main, LLCM� . 53795 Main Road,Southold NY 11971 531-948-0143 1110 111, 110 �� July 13,202+ ul' 1L E SOUTHOLDTOWN Jim Rich Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Po Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Chairman Rich and Members of the Planning Board: Thank you for the opportunity to address the Board and express my concerns regarding the Southold Free Library's proposed expansion.As the immediate eastern neighbor, I believe my property at 53795 Main Road will be among those most directly affected by the proposal. You may recall that I raised many of these concerns at last month's public hearing.Although I had hoped the library and its design team would consider the issues I identified, I have received no response to my outreach. I was also troubled by the June 4, 2026 letter submitted by Lisa Davidoff, President of the Library Board of Trustees,which appears in the online application file. In my view,that letter does not accurately represent my position. Parking and continued access to the private parking serving 53795 Main Read have consistently been central to every conversation I have had regarding this project.The online file also contains correspondence from the neighboring Feather Hill property expressing similar concerns about parking and making clear that the library is not permitted to use its parking area. At last month's meeting,the applicant indicated that it expects to rely, in part, upon the public parking lot across Main Road to accommodate additional vehicles beyond the limited parking proposed on the library property.While the Town owns a portion of that parcel,the Southold Park District owns the remainder. It is also a fully developable property.Although it is presently used for parking,there can be no assurance that it will remain available for that purpose indefinitely. The library should be held to the same parking and site-planning standards as any other property owner or institutional use in the Town. I respectfully ask the Board to consider the welcoming and functional spaces provided by other local libraries, particularly the Cutchogue and Mattituck-Laurel Libraries,where patron amenities are supported by appropriate on-site access and parking. The application file also includes a number of form Letters supporting the project.White I respect the views of those who submitted them, I question whether aLL of the writers fully understand the scope of the proposal or its practical consequences. The Library is already significantly underserved by parking. Despite several previous applications and approvals from the Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board,the anticipated parking improvements were either not installed or did not adequately address the Library's needs.The current proposal appears to create a net Loss of functional parking when the existing use of the rear Lot is taken into account. Although the plans describe that area as containing six employee parking spaces, it is regularly used by Library employees, patrons, and visitors to Southold's business district.That same area is now proposed to become an outdoor auditorium and event space. Many of the Letters of support correctly observe that a green space, pocket park, and outdoor auditorium could provide a public benefit. I do not disagree. However, many of those same Letters anticipate that the project will attract additional visitors from throughout the Town and beyond.That raises an obvious and unanswered question:where will those additional visitors park? The need for adequate parking does not appear to have received sufficient consideration. I also question why the application was not subjected to a more detailed review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, particularly given that the project appears to involve more than 4,000 square feet of site disturbance, substantial grading,and the importation of fill to create the proposed Landscape and auditorium. I recognize and respect the work of the Planning Board's professional staff.At the same time,the Planning Board is an independent decision-making body.,and each member is entitled to evaluate the application and vote according to their own judgment.The Board also has the authority to condition site-plan approval and require modifications that protect neighboring properties and serve the broader public interest. I respectfully ask the Board to carefully consider the impact of the proposal upon 53795 Main Road, including continued access to its private parking area and the ability of vehicles to safety enter, turn, and maneuver.That access is important not only for the building's present use, but also for any Lawful future use by its owners,tenants, customers, or visitors. I have suggested incorporating a small turnaround area similar to the one that presently exists in front of the Library and is proposed to remain.Alternatively, appropriately Located accessible parking spaces might serve two necessary purposes: providing convenient access from Main Road to the proposed outdoor auditorium white preserving safe and practical access to the parking area serving my property. rf There are also unresolved Legal and boundary issues that should not be overlooked.The Library and Jewell on Main LLC presently have a lot-line discrepancy. Legal documents previously signed by the library acknowledge a boundary that differs from the boundary depicted on the current survey and site plan. In addition,the subject property was used as a United States Post Office for decades, during which time there were Longstanding written and implied parking and access arrangements. It is our position that these circumstances support the existence of a prescriptive easement benefiting Jewell on Main LLC for continued access,turning, and vehicle maneuvering. ni It is also our Legal position that,following the Library's acquisition of the former Post Office parcel. and the Carsten property,the prior mutual right-of-way arrangement was extinguished and that the remaining right-of-way is for the benefit of Jewell on Main LLC and its future owners and tenants. The Library has sufficient frontage on Main Road to seek approval from the New York State Department of Transportation for its own curb cut and means of access. It should not be permitted to interfere with or encumber the access and easement rights benefiting Jewell on Main LLC. I respectfully request that the Planning Board require these parking, access, boundary, easement, and environmental-review issues to be fully addressed before acting upon the application. Respectfully submitted., Nicholas J. Plana mento Member,Jewell on Main LLC �m Joan@jbischofflaw.com Bischoff Law (631) 948-0234 PLLC ATTORNEY AT LAW 7160 Hortons Lane Southold, NY 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN.PLANNING BOARD s„b,C $4 4 M In the Matter of the Application of the Southold Free Library � CSC OWER10 Proposed Pocket Park/ Garden COVER MEMORANDUMsOUTHaLa TOWN PLANNING BOARD Accompanying Supplemental Statement Submitted July 13, 2026 Chairperson and Members of the Planning Board: Jewell on Main, LLC respectfully submits the attached Supplemental Statement, dated July 13, 2026, for inclusion in the record of this proceeding. The purpose of this Supplemental Statement is not to replace our prior submissions, but to supplement them in light of the issues that have continued to develop since the June 1, 2026 public hearing and our continued review of the Town's records and the Library's prior applications. Accordingly, this Supplemental Statement should be read together with the following previously submitted materials, copies of which are attached for the convenience of the Board: Exhibit A—Letter to the Southold Town Planning Board dated June 1, 2026, requesting deferral of action pending further review of circulation, access, maneuvering, and adjoining-property impacts. That letter sets forth the factual background,the history of the parties' discussions, the longstanding circulation patterns, the Route 25 access concerns, the significance of the Library's 2013 planning submissions, the existing rights-of-way, and the additional circulation analyses that we respectfully submitted should be required before final action is taken. Exhibit B—Written version of the oral presentation made before the Planning Board on June 1, 2026, summarizing our concerns regarding the proposed site's impact on longstanding parking access, circulation, maneuvering, and adjoining-property functionality, together with our request that the Board defer action until the record was complete. The attached Supplemental Statement does not repeat those submissions except where necessary for context. Instead, it addresses several additional matters that we respectfully submit are directly relevant to the Board's consideration of the application, including: • the effect of the proposed project upon longstanding access, circulation, and maneuvering serving 53795 Main Road; • the potential impairment or practical extinguishment of longstanding claimed property rights, including rights arising from recorded easements, the reasonable scope of existing easements, and other legal and equitable interests that may arise from decades of continuous and open use; • the distinction between the Planning Board's role in reviewing land-use impacts and the Supreme Court's jurisdiction to determine disputed property rights; • the effect that the proposed loss of practical parking access may have upon the continued lawful use, future occupancy, adaptive reuse, redevelopment potential, and future zoning compliance of the adjoining property; • the significance of the Town's own historical approvals, including the 2013 lot-line modification and earlier approvals recognizing this area as serving important access, circulation, and parking-related functions; and • why these issues warrant careful consideration before the Board authorizes permanent physical improvements that may substantially alter the longstanding status quo. Jewell on Main continues to emphasize that it does not oppose the concept of a public garden or beautification of downtown Southold. Our concern is directed solely to the present design and its location. We continue to believe that the Library's objectives can be achieved through a revised site plan that preserves the longstanding circulation and access necessary for the continued lawful use of the adjoining property. Accordingly, Jewell on Main respectfully requests that the Board consider this Supplemental Statement together with the attached June 1, 2026 letter and June 1, 2026 presentation as a single, integrated submission constituting our complete position on the application. We respectfully request that all three documents be incorporated into the administrative record. Respectfully submitted, JOAN H. BISCHOFF VAN HEEMSKERCK Attorney for Jewell on Main, LLC 2 � � Joan@jbischofFlaw.com Bischoff (631) 948-0234 PLLC 1ATTORNEY A T LAW 7160 Hortons Lane Southold, NY 11971 lr yi � • � ' /�. Southold, June 1, 2026 Southold Town Planning Board Planning Department, Town Hall Annex 54375 NYS Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Southold Free Library Amended Site Plan Application(Pocket Park) Request for Deferral Pending Further Review of Circulation, Access, Maneuvering, and Adjoining Property Impacts Chairperson and Members of the Planning Board: I write on behalf of Jewell on Main, LLC, owner of 53795 Main Road,the property immediately adjoining the Southold Free Library. At the outset, I wish to make clear that we are not opposed to the Library, nor are we opposed to the concept of a pocket park or public garden. To the contrary, we recognize that many residents may view the proposal as a welcome beautification project for this portion of downtown Southold, and we appreciate the Library's desire to improve its property and create an attractive public amenity. Our concern is not with the concept of the project itself. Rather, our concern is that the proposed location of the garden appears to occupy an area that has historically served important circulation, access, and vehicle maneuvering functions associated with the longstanding parking field serving 53795 Main Road. We believe these concerns can be addressed without defeating the overall objectives of the project. However, before permanent improvements are approved and installed, we respectfully submit that the Board should require additional review of the circulation, access, maneuvering, and adjoining-property impacts associated with the proposal. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Board defer action on the application and require the applicant to supplement the record with the information identified below. BACKGROUND This is not a new issue. On or about February 12, 2025, representatives of the Library invited us to review a revised version of the proposed project. During that meeting, we specifically raised concerns regarding the impact of the proposal on parking access, circulation, and vehicle maneuvering associated with the parking field serving 53795 Main Road. Those same concerns were raised again during a meeting with representatives of the Library earlier today in an effort to resolve the matter before this hearing. Unfortunately, despite discussions spanning more than a year, the concerns previously identified do not appear to have been addressed or accommodated in the plans currently before the Board. We also note that although the certified notice of application was mailed on May 19, actual receipt did not occur until May 29, leaving limited time to review the application materials, historical plans, surveys, circulation impacts, and title documents before tonight's hearing. LONGSTANDING CONDITIONS For more than forty years,the owners and occupants of 53795 Main Road and the owners and occupants of the adjoining parcel have coexisted with a longstanding and well-established pattern of parking, access, circulation, and vehicle maneuvering along the common boundary between the properties. The parking field serving 53795 Main Road has functioned for decades in reliance upon established circulation patterns, rights-of-way, and maneuvering areas located along and adjacent to that boundary. These circulation patterns did not arise recently. They existed before the Library acquired the adjoining parcel and have continued throughout the Library's ownership. The Library therefore acquired and maintained its property with full knowledge of the existing parking configuration, circulation patterns, and historical use of the area. Indeed,the existing circulation environment has historically benefited not only the owners and occupants of 53795 Main Road, but also Library patrons, visitors, neighboring businesses, customers,tenants, and members of the public utilizing this portion of downtown Southold. The parking and circulation environment surrounding these properties has functioned as part of the practical parking network serving the Main Road business district for decades. ROUTE 25 ACCESS AND SAFETY CONCERNS The circulation issues presented by this application must be evaluated in the context of the property's direct connection to Main Road (Route 25). Vehicles accessing the parking field do not maneuver within an isolated parking lot. Rather, they enter and exit through a constrained circulation corridor connecting directly to Main Road, one of the busiest and most heavily traveled roadways in the Town and the principal commercial corridor of downtown Southold. Because ingress and egress occur directly onto Route 25, adequate on-site circulation and maneuvering space are essential to safe operation. 2 u � The proposed garden appears to occupy portions of the area historically used for vehicle circulation and maneuvering associated with the parking field serving 53795 Main Road. As a result, the proposal raises legitimate questions concerning vehicle movements, turning maneuvers, circulation patterns, and the practical functionality of the parking field that have not been adequately addressed in the current record. THE LIBRARY'S PRIOR PLANNING SUBMISSIONS We are particularly concerned because the current proposal appears inconsistent with prior planning materials submitted by the applicant. In connection with the 2013 lot-line modification approved by the Planning Board,plans depicted a proposed access route to a lower level in approximately the same area now proposed for the pocket park. While prior plans do not dictate future site design, they demonstrate that this area was previously recognized by the applicant as serving an important access, circulation, and parking-related function. The current application does not appear to explain how the circulation and maneuvering functions previously identified in that location will be preserved, replaced, or accommodated. RIGHTS-OF-WAY,ACCESS,AND MANEUVERING AREAS The record reflects the existence of rights-of-way affecting the area in question. Historical surveys, title materials, and longstanding site conditions further demonstrate that areas adjacent to those rights-of-way have historically been utilized for vehicle circulation and maneuvering associated with the parking field serving 53795 Main Road. The attached exhibits illustrate the relationship between the proposed garden, the existing rights- of-way, and the circulation patterns that have historically served the parking field. We recognize that the Planning Board is not being asked to adjudicate private property rights. However, the Board is being asked to approve permanent physical improvements in an area where substantial questions remain concerning access, circulation, maneuvering, and the practical use of existing parking facilities. The existence of recorded rights-of-way, longstanding historical use, and unresolved questions concerning access and circulation rights further support the need for caution before permanent improvements are approved in this location. INFORMATION MISSING FROM THE RECORD 3 Based upon our review, the current record does not appear to contain sufficient information to evaluate the circulation, maneuvering, and adjoining-property impacts of the proposal. At a minimum, we respectfully request: 1. A circulation analysis addressing existing circulation patterns and the impact of the proposed garden on vehicle movement, and proposed access to the park 2. Vehicle-turning templates demonstrating how vehicles may safely maneuver within the circulation system serving the site following construction of the proposed improvements. 3. A comparison between the circulation concepts reflected in the 2013 lot-line modification materials and the current proposal. 4. A survey overlay depicting the proposed garden footprint in relation to property boundaries, rights-of-way, circulation paths, and maneuvering areas. 5. An evaluation of whether the proposed improvements will impair existing circulation patterns or materially reduce the practical ability to access and utilize the parking field serving 53795 Main Road. REQUESTED ACTION We are asking the Board to reject this project as presented and require the applicant to submit a revised application ensuring access to existing parking field at 53795 Main Road. We respectfully submit that the concerns identified above do not require abandonment of the project. Rather, they warrant additional review and, if necessary, reasonable modifications to the site plan so that the Library's objectives can be achieved without unnecessarily impairing longstanding circulation and access serving neighboring properties. Approving permanent physical improvements before these issues are fully evaluated risks creating an avoidable conflict affecting circulation, access, maneuvering, and the practical operation of adjoining properties. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Board defer action on the application and require the applicant to supplement the record with the information identified above before any final determination is made. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, JOAN BISCHOFF VAN HEEMSKERCK Attorney for Jewell on Main, LLC Owner of 53795 Main Road 4 Good evening, Mr. Chairman and members of the Planning Board. My name is Joan Bischoff van Heemskerck, and I appear on behalf of Jewell on Main, LLC,the owner of the adjoining property at 53795 Main Road. At the outset, I want to make something very clear. We are not opposed to the Southold Free Library. We are not opposed to the concept of a pocket park or public garden. Like many residents, we recognize that beautification of this area of downtown Southold could be a positive addition to the community. Our concern is not with the project's objective. Our concern is with its location and its impact on longstanding access, circulation, and maneuvering patterns that serve the adjoining property. We respectfully submit that the Board should not approve permanent improvements in this location until those impacts are fully understood and evaluated. This is not a new issue. On February 12, 2025, representatives of the Library invited us to review a revised version of the project. At that time, we raised concerns regarding parking access, circulation, and vehicle maneuvering affecting the parking field serving 53795 Main Road. We raised those same concerns again during a meeting with Library representatives earlier today. Unfortunately, despite those discussions, the concerns remain unresolved. For more than forty years, the properties have coexisted with a longstanding pattern of parking, access, circulation, and vehicle maneuvering along the common boundary. The parking field serving 53795 Main Road is not an isolated parking lot. It functions as part of a circulation system that has existed for decades. Importantly,that parking field is accessed through a constrained corridor connecting directly to Main Road, Route 25, one of the busiest roadways in the Town and the principal commercial corridor of downtown Southold. Vehicles entering and exiting the parking field must safely maneuver within that constrained area before entering or exiting directly onto Route 25. Because of that condition, circulation and maneuvering space are critically important. Based upon our review of the plans, surveys, historical site conditions, and the attached exhibits, the proposed garden appears to occupy portions of an area that has historically been used for circulation and vehicle maneuvering associated with the parking field serving our property. We are particularly concerned because the Library's own prior submissions appear to recognize the importance of this area. In connection with the 2013 lot-line modification approved by this Board,plans depicted a proposed access route to lower-level parking in approximately the same area now proposed for the pocket park. We are not suggesting that prior plans permanently dictate future site design. However,those plans demonstrate that this area was previously recognized as serving an important access and circulation function. The current application does not explain how that function will be preserved, replaced, or accommodated. We are also not asking the Planning Board to adjudicate private property rights. However, we do want the record to reflect that unresolved issues exist concerning rights-of-way, longstanding historical use, circulation patterns, and other legal and equitable interests affecting this area. Those issues further support a cautious approach before permanent improvements are approved. Most importantly, we respectfully submit that the current record does not contain sufficient information for the Board to fully evaluate the circulation impacts of this proposal. We have not seen: • A circulation analysis; • Vehicle-turning templates; • A comparison between the 2013 circulation concept and the current proposal; • An overlay showing the relationship between the proposed garden, the rights-of-way, the adjoining property, and the historical circulation patterns; or • An analysis of the impact of the proposal on the ability to safely access and utilize the adjoining parking field. We are not asking the Board to deny this application. We are asking the Board to ensure that it has a complete record before taking final action. We believe these concerns can be addressed. We believe the Library's objectives and the neighboring property's access needs can both be accommodated. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Board defer action, hold the record open, or otherwise require additional review before granting final approval. Thank you for your time and consideration. SOUTHOLD, July 13, 2026 SUPPLEMENTAL WRITTEN STATEMENT Submitted to the Southold Town Planning Board Southold Free Library — Proposed Pocket Park / Garden Jewell on Main, LLC — 53795 Main Road Chairperson and Members of the Planning Board: This supplemental statement is respectfully submitted to accompany our oral presentation and our previously submitted letters and statements in opposition. At the outset, we reiterate that Jewell on Main, LLC is not opposed to the Library or to the concept of a public garden or pocket park. We recognize that the proposal has the potential to enhance downtown Southold and provide a benefit to the community. Our concern is far narrower. Our concern is that the proposed location of the improvements appears to occupy an area that has served for decades as part of the established vehicular circulation and access system serving 53795 Main Road. We believe these concerns can likely be addressed through additional study and reasonable modification of the plan. For that reason, we respectfully request that the Board defer final action until the issues identified below have been adequately evaluated. 1. The Proposal May Permanently Impair Longstanding Access Before the Rights Are Determined The proposed site plan does more than install landscaping. It would place permanent physical improvements within an area that has been openly, visibly, continuously, and historically used for vehicular access and maneuvering serving the adjoining property for decades. Jewell on Main has repeatedly advised the Library that it claims legal and equitable interests arising from those longstanding conditions, including recorded rights-of- way and additional rights that may arise from decades of continuous use and other legal doctrines. Those issues remain unresolved. We are not asking this Board to determine whether those rights ultimately exist. That question belongs to the Supreme Court if the parties cannot resolve it. However, the Planning Board is being asked to approve a site plan whose practical effect may be to eliminate or materially interfere with those claimed rights before they have been judicially determined. Once constructed, the proposed improvements may substantially alter the status quo and make restoration difficult or impossible. Accordingly, while the Planning Board is not the forum to adjudicate private property rights, it should proceed cautiously where approval of a site plan may effectively prejudice or impair unresolved rights that are the subject of a bona fide dispute. 2. The Town's Own Records Demonstrate the Importance of Access and Circulation The Town's files demonstrate that parking, circulation, and access have been central considerations in prior approvals affecting these properties. In particular: • The 2013 lot-line modification approved by the Planning Board was presented as facilitating additional Library parking and access, including access to lower-level parking. • Earlier approvals likewise emphasized the importance of safe vehicular circulation and access associated with the Library property. • Suffolk County Planning previously commented on the need to avoid conflicts involving driveway and pedestrian easements. These prior approvals demonstrate that the area now proposed for permanent landscaping has historically been recognized as serving an important circulation function. rc The current application does not appear to explain how those functions will be preserved or accommodated. 3. The Proposal May Affect the Lawful Future Use of the Adjoining Property This application is not simply about today's parking arrangement. The parking field serving 53795 Main Road is an integral component of the lawful use of that property. If the proposed improvements materially impair practical access to that parking field, the consequences extend beyond day-to-day convenience. The proposal may affect: • the continued lawful use of the building; • future occupancy; • future changes in use; • adaptive reuse; • redevelopment opportunities; • parking availability required by future approvals; and • overall site functionality. These are legitimate land-use considerations directly relevant to site-plan review because they concern circulation, access, and impacts upon adjoining property. 4. The Record Appears Incomplete We respectfully submit that the current record does not contain sufficient information to fully evaluate the consequences of the proposed improvements. Among other things, the record does not appear to include: • a comprehensive circulation analysis; • vehicle-turning templates demonstrating maneuverability after construction; • an analysis of impacts upon the adjoining property's circulation and parking functionality; • a comparison between the circulation concepts reflected in the 2013 approval and the current proposal; or • an overlay depicting the relationship between the proposed garden, the existing rights-of-way, and the historical circulation patterns serving the adjoining property. Without this information, it is difficult for the Board to fully assess the consequences of approving permanent improvements in this location. 5. Requested Action We respectfully emphasize that we are not asking the Board to deny this application. Rather, we ask the Board to exercise its discretion to ensure that the record is complete before final approval is granted. Specifically, we respectfully request that the Board: 1. Defer or adjourn final action on the application; or, alternatively, hold the record open for additional submissions; 2. Require the applicant to provide additional analyses concerning circulation, vehicle maneuvering, and impacts upon adjoining properties; 3. Encourage the parties to continue discussions regarding modifications that would preserve longstanding access while allowing the Library's project to proceed; and 4. Avoid approving permanent physical improvements that may materially interfere with unresolved property rights and longstanding access arrangements until those issues have been adequately addressed. Jewell on Main remains committed to working cooperatively with the Library to achieve a solution that allows the proposed beautification project to move forward while preserving the longstanding access, circulation, and parking functionality upon which our property has relied for decades. We respectfully thank the Board for its consideration. Respectfully submitted, f JOAN BISCHOFF VAN HEEMSKERCK Attorney for Jewell on Main, LLC Owner of 53795 Main Road YPL�-"Y Uq rL, - C/WV &),�(I /�/- tik"7 ,� i-r-61 C4 There is one additional point that we respectfully ask the Board to consider. The proposed site plan does more than add landscaping or create a public garden. As designed, it would permanently occupy an area that has been used openly, visibly, continuously, and without interruption for decades as part of the established vehicular access and circulation serving our property. The Board is not being asked to determine whether those longstanding uses have matured into legal rights. That question, if necessary, belongs in the Supreme Court. However, the Board is being asked to approve a plan that would effectively extinguish those longstanding uses before those rights have been determined. Once the proposed improvements are constructed, the status quo cannot easily be restored. In practical terms, approval of this site plan could permanently impair or eliminate rights that may exist by recorded easement, by the reasonable scope of existing easements, or by other legal or equitable doctrines arising from decades of continuous use. For that reason alone, we respectfully submit that caution is warranted. The Board's responsibility is not to adjudicate those rights, but neither should it knowingly approve a site plan that assumes those rights do not exist. There is an additional planning consideration. The parking field serving 53795 Main Road is an integral component of the lawful use of our property. The continued use, occupancy, adaptive reuse, and future development of our building depend upon maintaining lawful and practical access to those parking spaces. If the proposed project removes or materially impairs that access, the effect extends well beyond today's parking arrangement. It may permanently affect the future lawful use of our property by reducing or eliminating parking necessary to support future occupancy, changes in use, redevelopment opportunities, and compliance with applicable zoning and building requirements. Those are not merely private property issues. They are legitimate land use and planning considerations directly affected by the site plan before you. The Town's own records demonstrate that parking, circulation, and access have repeatedly been central to prior approvals affecting these properties. The 2013 lot- line modification was approved to facilitate parking access, and earlier approvals likewise recognized the importance of vehicular circulation serving the Library property. The current proposal would materially alter that longstanding circulation pattern without a corresponding analysis of the consequences for adjoining properties. Accordingly, we respectfully submit that the prudent course is not to deny the project, but to defer final action until the Board has a complete record regarding circulation, maneuvering, adjoining-property impacts, and the unresolved access issues that have been repeatedly brought to the Library's attention. Page 11 Southold Town Planning Board S-.6+ In the Matter of the f'g 4�-i 6c0 Nt C h P+ SOUTHOLD FREE LIBRARY n M0�1J[EllW/- �;V.�;�j� a OUFHOLD MIN MEMORANDUM OF LAW PLANNING BOARD IN OPPOSITION TO RVIPOSITION OF A SITE PLAN CONDITION REQUIRING APPLICANT TO PROVIDE A VEHICULAR TURNAROUND FOR THE BENEFIT OF AN ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER FACTS: The Southold Free Library is a not for profit corporation chartered by the New York State Board of-Regents. It is funded by Southold Town School taxpayers through the Southold Town School Special District. Funds are to be used for the benefit of the Southold Town taxpayers. The Southold Free Library owns and operates the library and an ancillary "book cottage" on a 0.93 acre property (herein "Library Property") which has frontage on Main Road and Traveler Street. The Library also owns a 0.39 acre vacant lot' abutting the Library property to the east. (herein the "Vacant Lot") The Library has proposed merging the Vacant Lot with the Library Property. A community green space is proposed for the Vacant Lot with gardens and improvements for library outdoor programming. The existing parking on the Vacant Lot is to be relocated on the northerly portion of the Vacant Lot with access on Travelers Street. The Vacant Lot shares a common driveway to Main Road with a commercial property abutting its easterly boundary. The commercial property is a 0.10 acre property improved with a structure fronting Main Road and parking area to the rear. [herein "Commercial Property"]. The Vacant Lot and the Commercial Property are each burdened by a 4 V2 foot wide easement respectively creating the shared 9-foot-wide driveway which provides access to the rear of the Commercial Property and to existing parking on the Vacant Lot used by the Library. 1 It was previously improved with a one-story commercial stucco building, a garage, two-story house and frame building on Traveler's Street. Page 12 The merged parcel will remove the existing parking on the Vacant Lot and relocate it to provide additional parking in the northerly portion of the Vacant Lot with access to Travelers Street. The Vacant Lot will also include pedestrian walkways from the main library building to the lower Vacant Lot and walkway from the Main Road to Traveler's Street. The area of the Vacant Lot merged lot which is adjacent to the Main Road is intended to serve as a public garden and park area with sitting areas for library programs and a tiered sitting area for children's programs. A site plan prepared by Salty Roots, Gardens and Landscape Designers shows the proposed improvements. The existing shared driveway easement is of limited use to the library. The redevelopment of the Vacant Lot Main Road area] of the parcel is only for pedestrian use. The owners of the Commercial Property are asking the Planning Board to require a vehicle turnaround on the Vacant Lot for improved circulation on the Commercial Property. The Library Trustees have offered a "license" to effectively widen the easement area by an additional 4.5 to 5' feet to benefit both the library access to the open-air program areas and the owner of the abutting commercial property. Nevertheless, the adjacent owners ask that the Library Trustees further encumber the proposed park areas of the library property with a "turn around" for improved circulation of the neighbor's parking area. The Trustees do not consent to the dedication of additional property area which is unnecessary for the Library's use of its property. PRELBUNARY STATEMENT The issue presented is not whether a turnaround area might be convenient for neighboring property owners. The issue is whether the Southold Town Planning Board possesses statutory authority to require an applicant to dedicate or redesign a portion of its private property for the principal benefit of an adjoining landowner. The straightforward answer is no, Town Law § 274-a authorizes only those conditions that are directly related and incidental to the impacts created by the proposed development. It does not empower a planning board to redistribute private property rights between neighboring owners or to require one owner to improve his property primarily for the convenience of another. If the Board were to impose such a condition, it would exceed its statutory authority, improperly adjudicate a private property dispute, and impose an unconstitutional exaction lacking both statutory and constitutional nexus. Page 13 POINT I THE SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD'S AUTHORITY IS LIMITED TO CONDITIONS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Town Law § 274-a authorizes planning boards reviewing site plans to impose only: "Reasonable conditions and restrictions as are directly related to and incidental to a proposed site plan." This statutory language is a limitation upon municipal authority. Conditions may mitigate impacts created by the proposed development. They may not require an applicant to surrender property rights simply because another private owner desires an improved arrangement. The driveway easement has been redesigned with a permissive "license" to use an additional 45-5' of gravel along the library's legal non-exclusive easement. The proposed fence used to protect the public use of the park area from vehicles using the driveway will be placed 45-5' within the Library's parcel to accommodate vehicle access. The neighbor's request for a turn-around will materially impact the library program area. New York courts have consistently recognized that land use boards possess only those powers delegated by statute and local law. Conditions exceeding those delegated powers are arbitrary and capricious and cannot stand. Here, the requested turnaround is not proposed by the Applicant. Rather, it is demanded by an adjoining owner who seeks to improve vehicular maneuverability benefiting its own property use. Nothing in Town Law § 274-a authorizes the Planning Board to compel such a private accommodation. POINT II SITE PLAN REVIEW MAY NOT BE USED TO ALTER OR EXPAND PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS The Planning Board's jurisdiction extends to determining whether an application complies with zoning and site plan standards. It does not extend to creating, enlarging, or reallocating private easement rights. Where adjoining landowners possess recorded easements or reciprocal access agreements, those documents define the extent of each owner's rights. Neither the Planning Board nor either property owner may enlarge those rights absent mutual agreement or judicial determination. If no turnaround Page 4 easement exists, the neighboring owner possesses no legal entitlement to require the Applicant to burden its property with additional maneuvering space. Likewise, the Planning Board lacks authority to accomplish indirectly what the neighboring owner could not compel directly through private litigation. To hold otherwise would effectively transform the Planning Board into a tribunal for resolving private property disputes—an authority never granted by Town Law. THE PLANNING BOARD MAY NOT ADJUDICATE PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS The Court of Appeals has made clear that municipal land use approvals do not determine private property rights. In Chambers v. Old Stone Hill Road Assoc., 1 N.Y.3d 424 (2004), the Court explained: "A municipality determines only that the application complies with the municipality's standards and conditions contained in the zoning ordinance." The Court further observed that questions involving easements and restrictive covenants remain matters of private property law, separate from zoning approval. The Second Department recently reaffirmed this principle in Matter of Su Yan Chen v. Planning Board of the Incorporated VW age of Brookvifle, 2026 NY Slip Op. 03313 (2d Dept. 2026). There, neighboring property owners argued that a site plan should not be approved until a private easement dispute was resolved. The Second Department rejected that argument, holding that the Planning Board properly approved the application without resolving the private property dispute because: "The use that may be made of land under a zoning ordinance and the use of the same land under an easement or restrictive covenant are ... separate and distinct matters." The Court specifically held that the Planning Board did not act improperly by approving the site plan without a resolution of the private property dispute concerning the scope of the alleged easement. If the Board cannot refuse approval until private easement rights are resolved, it certainly should not create or enlarge those rights by conditioning approval upon one owner's surrender of additional property to another. Page I5 POINT III THE REQUESTED CONDITION IS NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO IMPACTS CREATED BY THE APPLICANT'S PROJECT The statutory requirement that conditions be "directly related and incidental" requires a demonstrable nexus between: the impacts of the proposed development; and the condition imposed. In this case, the library intends to relocate existing parking located in the southerly portion of the Vacant Lot being merged with the library's improved property. The relocation will greatly reduce the library's vehicular use of the shared driveway, not increase it. There is no need to expand the shared right of way, and there is certainly no need for a traffic turnaround on the Library property. The library's site plan design reduces library patron traffic of the shared right of way, and does not create any need for improvement for vehicular traffic circulation or Parking. A condition imposed merely because an adjoining owner believes a turnaround would improve operations is not a land use mitigation measure. It is a private benefit. Such a condition exceeds the authority granted by Town Law § 274- a. Town Law § 274-a(4) authorizes only: "reasonable conditions and restrictions as are directly related to and incidental to a proposed site plan." The Second Department repeatedly treats this language as a substantive limitation upon Planning Board authority. See: Matter of Empire Import-Export of USA, Inc. v. Town of East Hampton Planning Board, 182 A.D.3d 617 (2d Dept. 2020) (planning board conditions must fall within § 274-a and judicial review examines whether the determination had a rational basis and complied with the statute). Matter of Valentine v. McLaughlin, 87 A.D.3d 1155 (2d Dept. 2011) (recognizing that Planning Board authority to impose conditions derives exclusively from Town Law § 274-a and applicable local code). Thus, before imposing a turnaround condition, the Board must identify record evidence demonstrating that: the Library's proposal creates a circulation problem; the turnaround mitigates that problem; and the burden imposed is directly related to that impact. No such findings appear possible on the facts presented. Page 6 POINT IV THE EXISTENCE OF A MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT ACROSS THE STREET DEMONSTRATES THAT THE REQUESTED CONDITION IS NOT NECESSARY The record establishes that a public municipal parking lot exists immediately opposite the shared driveway. If motorists may lawfully utilize the public street system together with the municipal parking area to reverse direction or otherwise maneuver safely, the claimed necessity for an on-site turnaround is substantially undermined. The existence of a reasonable public alternative distinguishes this matter from situations involving isolated commercial sites lacking adequate circulation. The Board must base its decision upon substantial evidence. Speculation that a private turnaround would be more convenient than existing public facilities does not constitute substantial evidence supporting the imposition of additional burdens upon the Applicant's property. The Board cannot rely upon generalized statements that "a turnaround would be better." There is no substantial evidence that the Applicant's property must be redesigned. Convenience to an adjoining owner is not a planning standard recognized by Town Law § 274-a. POINT V THE REQUESTED CONDITION IMPROPERLY ADVANCES A PRIVATE BENEFIT RATHER THAN A LEGITIMATE SITE PLAN PURPOSE Planning Board authority exists to protect the public. It does not exist to improve one private landowner's operational efficiency at another owner's expense. Here, the neighboring owner seeks an improvement claiming that it would increase maneuvering area, facilitate access, enhance convenience, and potentially increase the value and utility of the neighboring parcel, while requiring the Applicant to permanently dedicate land without reciprocal consideration. Such a condition would constitute an improper transfer of private benefit under the guise of land use regulation. Nothing within Town Law § 274-a authorizes that result. Page 7 POINT VI HAPOSING THE CONDITION WOULD RAISE SERIOUS CONSTITUTIONAL CONCERNS Permit conditions requiring an owner to dedicate property are subject to constitutional limitations. The United States Supreme Court has held that land use exactions must satisfy both an "essential nexus" and "rough proportionality" between the governmental interest and the property demanded. Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987). Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994). Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, 601 U.S. 267 (2024). While these decisions arose in different factual settings, the constitutional principles apply broadly to compelled property dedications imposed through permit conditions. Here • the Library is not creating a circulation problem requiring dedication; • the demanded turnaround primarily benefits an adjoining private owner; • there is no demonstrating that surrender of the Library's property is proportional to any impact created by the project. Accordingly, the requested condition would raise substantial constitutional concerns under both the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, § 7 of the New York Constitution. In Riegert Apartments Corp. v. Planning Board of the Town of Clarkstown, 57N..Y.2d 206 (1982), the Court of Appeals held that municipalities may not expand site plan review authority beyond that authorized by Town Law § 274-a. The Court emphasized that the Legislature established a statewide statutory framework governing site plan review and that local requirements inconsistent with that framework are invalid. Accordingly, the Southold Planning Board may not exercise powers beyond those granted by § 274-a, including requiring property concessions that are not directly related and incidental to the proposed site plan. POINT VII IF THE BOARD BELIEVES ADDITIONAL TURNAROUND RIGHTS ARE NECESSARY, THEY MUST BE ACQUIRED THROUGH PRIVATE AGREEMENT RATHER THAN REGULATORY COMPULSION Should the Board conclude that additional turnaround rights are desirable, the proper remedy is not to compel the Applicant to dedicate property. Rather, the neighboring owner may: negotiate an easement; purchase additional property rights; enter a reciprocal access agreement; or otherwise obtain consensual rights through private agreement. The Planning Board possesses no authority to substitute regulatory compulsion for private negotiation. CONCLUSION For all of the foregoing reasons, the Planning Board should decline the adjoining owner's request that the Applicant provide additional turnaround area upon the Applicant's property. Dated: Southold, NY July 13, 2026 Respectfully, a ° cia C. Moore Attorney for Southold Free Library 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 631-765-4330 James Rich s July 8, 2026 Chair P 13 Id,L- C 1-/ Planning BoardIC %[ uj Southold Town Dear Mr. Rich, SOUTHOLD hilt N PLANNNG SOARO _J am a recently retired employee of the Southold Free Library, where I worked for over 21 years as a certified public librarian in Teen and Tween Services. Before I retired, I was aware of the plans to renovate and redesign the "Pocket Park" on the east side of the library on Route 25 in Southold. The park has been used for many summers as a place to offer programs for children of all ages. As successful as these programs have been, it has not been an ideal place for library patrons. The only point of entry is from the Main road and through the employee parking area making accessibility to the park difficult and at times unsafe. There is not adequate lighting, and comfortable seating and shade are limited. The renovation plans offer shade, lighting, plenty of places to sit, easy and safe access from the street as well as the library, a comfortable area for children's programs, and an arena for entertainment for all ages. The park will be open and accessible to adults, teens, and children looking for a place to rest, read, play, attend programs, and visit with friends. This newly improved park will be a place for entertainment, education, and enjoyment, and a place that will add to the beauty and charm of Southold. It will be a great asset to the community; a place to be enjoyed by library patrons, residents, merchants, and visitors for many years to come. The attraction will be undeniable! I am in full support of this project, and I look forward to a new and beautiful park that is accessible to all! Sincerely Yours, Penelope M. Kelley el e,n M F i n.n, .,,, gz,a n ff i re E gnui i iwr 2042-6 _ ' JUI 0 6 7-026 UTHOLD TOWN 4 PLANNING SOAR, Ja mcj,,s I f, RiCh III Challr Wow" Members of the Southold Town Pta ntng Board P,O,. BOX 1179 Southold, NY tiq7l Dear Mu. ch and members of die&uthuld Town Planning Mard., 1, writs support of the proposed pocket park al the Southold ldbraq.The library'I'll's the tower r%` .. I use most often. l have tutored, have play din tournaxnents,, and attended several I Ll tires acid classes as wee- as bang an a�� reader th rough he. Lib y � in 30 .� A ar v%uWd he a vmnderful-ddition to both Lhe hbraxv and the town overall F°Or tbe1n)raryt, it wo,a d.prmiide spa*e for conw-rsation that could other+ ise'be disruptive to thie q�et atmosphere ithm" the walk%of the 11br r - For tffi town, anadier grmn space to,mm4 friends,share cote*or simple read outdnors wo,u1d. be uv me*.. The existing beqaest WHI hopefuRv make r,uur dixigion to,support the k'".s deovlont an easy one.. N1N Y Y I` nn R III, d • 0� r Itt From: ginny blank<blank.ginny@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,June 29,2026 10:07 AM , �^ To: Michaelis,Jessica;Lanza, Heather 5 v bF Subject: Library Greenspace P9, 14L- (3G 1 M0 . 04 ED' ' James H. Rich III, Chair F, J U'N 3 0 2�21'f; Members of the Southold Town Planning Board SOl1TYiULG,-00 0! p ����� P.O. Box 1179 � l . - � -I �. Z Southold NY 11971 3 15 , 5- Good morning. I'm writing this note in support of the proposal for the Greenspace at the adjoining property by the library. The most valued gift to any community is the library and we have found the Southold Library a constant provider for the community over the 14 years that we have lived in Southold. Having a place where everyone can enjoy reading, sitting and chatting with neighbors, sipping coffee and enjoying the nice weather, is a special gift and one we would find very inviting,. The proposal is in a place that is easily accessible. It would be a gift to all of us. A gift that keeps on giving. We support this proposal 100% and hope to see it become a reality. Thankyou. Ginny Blank Robert Blank Southold, NY ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. i ... ...........................- ---------..... From: Jim Roth <jirnroth22@grnai1.corn> W.Sent: Wednesday,June 24,2026 8:51 AM P+� QGr c +1�� To: Michaelis,Jessica Fcfl 0 Y/IL K I D Cc: Lanza, Heather Subject: Library Pocket Park JUN ........... 4 2026 SOUTHOLD TO4V;l PLANNING BOARD Good morning. My name is Jim Roth, and I am the Vice President of the Southold Free Library Board of Trustees. As you may know, we as the Board of Trustees of the Southold Free Library have spent the past four years carefully planning and designing a beautiful green space on the property adjacent to the Library. This new outdoor area will enhance Library programming opportunities, provide full ADA accessibility, and create a welcoming space for residents and visitors to enjoy. Thanks to the generosity of private donors and the support of state grants, all funding for the project has been secured, and we hope to begin construction this fall. The project will also include additional parking near the Book Cottage and an attractive pedestrian walkway, further improving access to the Library grounds. Most importantly, this space will serve as a tasting tribute to Maureen Osterman, a former trustee whose commitment to philanthropy, community service, and the spirit of giving helped shape the Southold community for generations. I would hope that the Planning Board Look on this project in a very favorable light. Sincerely, Jim Roth 950 Waterview Drive Southold NY 11971 516-642-5236 ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on (inks from unknown senders or unexpected emaiLs. S From: Sarah McNau hton <mcnau hton.s@ maiI.com> L G � Sent: Wednesday,June 17,2026 3:46 PM --1 �, � 5 �� To: Michaelis,Jessica;Lanza, Heather Subject: In Support of Southold Library Pocket Park JUI� I a 2026 SOUTHOLG i 0 Vj,14 P�..Jl�il"46�w d�6�kT0 Dear Planning Board, I am writing to voice my full support for the Southold Free Library outdoor green space proposal.As a Southold town resident who often uses the Southold Free Library, I think the addition of a welcoming outdoor green space would bring immense benefits to our community, particularly in allowing the library to expand its excellent programming and offerings for our residents of all ages through this additional space. I am aware that the Southold Free Library has devoted substantial time and effort, with the assistance of numerous professionals, to develop a beautiful outdoor space plan that meets the needs of the community, for which funding has already been secured. Because this will be at no additional cost to the Town, it is an especially important opportunity for us to take advantage of.This will also help direct traffic to downtown Southold--an added bonus to local businesses, which have been facing tougher times over the last year. Of course, this project is also meaningful because it will also honor Maureen Ostermann, a steward of Southold community and ardent supporter of the library. I'm asking that you please grant approval for the library's proposed outdoor green space.This would have many impactful benefits for our town for generations to come. Thank you for your consideration and attention to this matter, Sarah Sarah McNaughton mcnau hton.s mail.com 203.770.4020 ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. i Lenore and Louis Potters S�V 575 Hill Road Southold, NY 11971 MQ RR[I� �, ( ) June 17, 2026 .�UN���� 1 0 Southold Planning Board SOUNr°G "D Town of Southold Dear Planning Board, We are writing to support the Southold Free Library outdoor green space proposal. As a long-standing patron of libraries and now residents of Southold, we have always enjoyed a library that has a welcoming outdoor green space. The programs offered by our local library are engaging and well attended by all ages. We need more opportunities and outdoor spaces to enjoy these programs. We are aware that the Southold Free Library has devoted substantial time and effort, with the assistance of various professionals, to develop a beautiful outdoor space plan that meets the needs of the community. Best of all, funding has already been secured, so there is no additional cost to the Town. This project will also honor Maureen Ostermann, a steward of the Southold community and an ardent supporter of the library. This will also help direct traffic to downtown Southold, which is an added bonus to local businesses. This is a win-win for our Town! Please grant approval for the library's proposed outdoor green space. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, e.5 y Zeaone aad Zoui�, Pomw Lenore Potters Louis Potters ........................ ..................... From: Barbara willensky<barbarawillensky@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday,June 16,2026 6:01 PM -M CI J lf To,: Michaelis,Jessica Cc: Lanza,Heather Subject: Fwd:Support for Southold Library Pocket Park JUN 17 20Z6 SOUT1h'%eX0 TOWN PLANNfNG BOARD > Dear Planning Board, �O I. — �"" � s'• Z 3 r� . s— > I am writing to support the Southold Free Library outdoor green space proposal. As a long standing patron of libraries and now a resident of Southold, I have always enjoyed a library that has a welcoming outdoor green space. The programs offered by our local library are fantastic and well attended by all ages. We need more opportunities and outdoor spaces to enjoy these programs. > I am aware that the Southold Free Library has devoted substantial time and effort, with the assistance of various professionals, to develop a beautiful outdoor space plan that meets the needs of the community. Funding has already been secured, so there is no additional cost to the Town. This project will also honor Maureen Ostermann, a steward of Southold community and ardent supporter of the library. This will also help direct traffic to downtown Southold which is an added bonus to local businesses. > This is a win-win for our Town! > Please grant approval for the library's proposed outdoor green space. > Thank you for your consideration. > Barbara and Nathan Willensky 1440 Kimberly Lane Southold's NY 11971 ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 %�111" I --- - -............. -S, kE From: LAURIE MANDELBAUM <Igmandelbaum@aoLcom> Sent: Tuesday,June 16,2026 822 AM To: Michaelis,Jessica SUN 1 6 20 2 6 Cc: Lanza,Heather Subject: [SPAM]-Library Greenspace Project SOUTHOLD TOWN PLAFEklt1G BOARD Dear Ms. Michaels, I am writing this letter to express my support for the town Library Greenspace Project. My husband and I and our children (now young adults) have spent many happy times in the library, and are fully supportive of the project. As homeowners in Southold for 25 years we have seen many things change, but the library has always been a wonderful resource. When our kids were children the summer programming was an integral part of our weekly life, as well as many of our neighbors. To have the extra space to read books or have outdoor programs would be a fantastic addition to our community. The library is a unique place to bring people together and I couldn't imagine a better use for the land they are proposing to incorporate into the Library property. Please feel free to contact me should you need any further information. Lauren Gordon Sent from my iPhone ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 11111pi 111MOMMOMMMMOMMUMML............ From: Katie Magill <klmagill@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday,June 16,2026 10:48 AM To: Michaelis,Jessica Cc: Lanza,Heather Subject: Support for Southold Library Pocket Park JUN 16 2026 SOUTHIOLDTOWN r1,LX1,,1N'ANG BOARD Dear Planning Board, I am writing to support the Southold Free Library outdoor green space proposal. As a Long standing patron of Libraries,, I have always enjoyed a library that has a welcoming outdoor green space that meet the needs of all our Southold town residents. We need more opportunities and outdoor spaces to enjoy to programs. Let's work together to get this done in a timely and considerate manner. Please grant approval for the library's proposed outdoor green space. Thank you for your consideration. Best, Katie Magill ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emaiLs. ......... ..............................................................................................- From: Eve Koopersmith <evekoopersmith@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,June 15,2026 4:43 PM To: Michaelis,Jessica Fll� HL" Cc: Lanza, Heather ����a�/ � p�'' Subject: Southhold Library proposed outdoor green space SUN 2026 To the members of the Town of Southhold Financial Planning Board, IOUTIOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ��. - r -is. Z � i s s-- 1 am writing to support the Southhold Free Library outdoor green space proposal. As a long standing patron of libraries on Long Island, and now a resident of Cutchogue, I have always enjoyed a library that has a welcoming outdoor green space. The programs offered by our local libraries are fantastic and well attended by all ages. We need more opportunities and outdoor spaces to enjoy these programs. I am aware that the Southhold Free Library has devoted substantial time and effort, with the assistance of various professionals, to develop a beautiful outdoor space plan that meets the needs of the community. Best of all, funding has already been secured, so there is no additional cost to the Town. This is a win-win for our Town! Please grant approval for the library's proposed outdoor green space. Thank you for your consideration. Eve Koopersmith 1630 Beebe Dr. Cutchogue, NY 11935 Sent from my iPhone ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 5-,/ r ac Submission Without a Cover Letter N 1 SOUTHOL®TOWN PLANWNG BOARD Name: Evt Nr+--z— ProjectTitle: S6\AJ—OnOI � L_l YJ► 0-V\-1 PO-r-;/_{ VI SCTM#: 1000 - — I -- # 5 , Z Date:. G j p 2-0 2- Details of Submission: -; I , I - I I I I � 4 . � � � � V_I'll" I I I I i . 1, \ � I ..... I I I I 11� "I 11 I , , I I 1 , � I-, 11 I � , � I � ? i � , 1 �" �',�......__,",\ 2 STORY 111--l-111: � " % ? � i � \ \ _, ,�, I ; I \ 111� ,I , 11 � . � I � I ? - 0 - - 11 _� - "I - "I � I _ � I I 0 0 - - 0 - () ___� '-1, � I � I ; I � I 11 " I � I w �% I , . � � � ? � I I I � I ..,.......1 �,� ,� �� %.k.-A., %A.A., : 11, __ � 4 � " ? BRICK BUILDING Z i 1, 11 - Z � , I , Z I � 0 I � � 11 � . � � 1_11� I Z1111111111 11 1: � 5 \ SALTY ROOTS I � � 1 � � I . � `I � I � " '' : j I i 1, � ... � � � _11-1 t � . I �_ , I 11 � . . I GARDEN&LANDSCAPE I - 0 - - 0 0 - : .-,_,.....� 11 11 � I �I ,,, 11 0 - 0 - I � 3 � �_ ' I 1, I -- I - - : �I ,; '�I� _-�� I 1, DESIGN "I i �� I 0 � __ 1�_, I'll -, '1� \ � 1 � I � ____,_____ I i � I � 11 �, - � , I �, '� I , �_____ , _.___,��__...... --- _.-__� I : � �"I �\_ � � � � , , -- _____ _____ "'.---__- --.............. ....- I � � �, 1, � � � I : "'"' � 1, I I I '_,_� r 11--�..I 11� I � � I I I- " �, I 1, I \ i - _____------ --_--.. ___ _ IT-.1.1-----------1� ,,, 'r I � � �' I " i \ � 1� , T "', - --��i -- --- --- --- - ___..____. .____,_ I � �k __,l I " : � I � � \ I ," I , I 1, , , __ , , I � : \ I \ 1� � 0 �, . '_ ",�11111____-_ ___z_,Xe_1 \ I I , __� , I ""� I � ", \ 0 �, � I I I � � "� , , � �: , " , I � ��,: , ;r , I,'-' 111'� -*r- I I \� \ '��_ I I 1'�P�,, � :,�i 'I" PO BOX 894 1 11 I , . I , I ,� �,,� \ i - 1 , , _,____71___1_7, ��� \ �1\ I i 1 t� , I I I "I � � I I I I I I I � 11, " - - . ? ! t , , I I� I I . "I ,/ ,I I ", 1� � � �--� :,�, I I e -_.________._.. � � I '_, �\ I / 11 ",","," 1" ,� I , ...........______. ..... I , , " - � , i I , ,� - 'I-,""- EDI EDI I 0 1 __ Mattltuck NY I 1 952 /I \ '11\ ,Z IV "I", ", i 1, . 11 . I I, - / I \ Z " i- 1-11- I _,___,.___j1�', : � "I , 1 I I . I _ � � � \ " /, " " /1" ��, , , , , --=� J�__I 1. �0 "I , � \�,� / , I � I I'll / 1 ", / \, , ,�11, I 1-1b I I L_ o - o - 0 - 01 oi- -� I I � , , ,,, " ". , "\ �",, l I'll I I �, I I ,� " I I _� � " I '' , \ " " � � � q 11 �\, sa�tyrootsny.com / � , \111 ,\ < 11 \ A I - i �, -........� I , . t t.� . � \ "."�� / ", "� / , I � \ I � � � � I I � , , � 11 I � I , ,I /" I 11 - I" "I "I 11 I . I :�['�',� , __ / �,, I I I I '1'1�1 ,�', / ,, " , �', . � ...__ I , I 1� '. I � � 11 \ " � I - , � , I I I , � I � � / -, I , ,� � ,� ,\ 'I, V, / I ", " -1111.111,11, 1� �...I 11-1 1-1-111-11- \ 631 .315,9091 f ,"': I I I \� 1�,\: 1�1 . "I __ ,'' \, Z, "" � � i � \ I I Z '\ /, I 1�1 1\ /1, , --- I � �1' 1, � I i �', � / � - 11, I z z � I I - z � I � , , / , """ , '� ,- __ I 1,-, ,"'i ,;,._-,,,,,,,'] , I 11 I " , _ � . I , '11� , �"", z - I 111-11 ----- � ,V �r I I I 1�11,,11,1'1`1`1`1 ` � �, ,/,, I " _ I , I �, i � I I I i � I, \ I ��, �1, "- , "'. ,,, , �____ � i ! " Pro*ect : � " , I q . z I I I I'� , , I / " " - _.,.______.'_1---------I .. � ," i , 11, 11, ....� I I � I . ...... -....I—— �, 11 � �, - ,I ,,, "'�\111`1' , Z, / ",1, , , , �, . I - , � , 11 21 �,, ,/ \ I "' -��' "-, "/ 111� I ----__ Southold Free Library . , � , � I ., � , , " I, "Ill 1 �,,"- 11 1 , , -__', -1111, �, , ", " 11 ,_ I , _- � � ____ � , - � I'll "\ _ I I .�__', �, -1 ______� � I � "I I I " I \ ''I "I'1\1 � ,11 I ...I-- _____ ___ ---_-- 33705 & 53745 Main Rd. 1�1 I �...... ,�, �1� � I \1 _,___.___.________ _____, Southold, NY I I I \1 - ;"�,��.... .. ,,,,, �,�,_ "I�, % ,,, �_,__ ,-----" __ '_�____� ----_----, _111__,____ I'll I---.-- ,", \,"., ',I �____ I I'll _11-�......, 11,, ,,1 � � ��, I �11,1, ----,, __11 -----_, ___�____ -_ ,_____� \', � I z",__--,,�, I\ ""I,�111 , 1", \__1 __� ___ ----,,, ____� , I , " "I" , " , \1' I ,� - ,'I ___... x ,- _____ - \1- \1 �)__ I_,'.�" I w "',......�, -�, . _________1'_"� "1______�____ ___________,__ I 11'-� ,__� ----___ ___1 ______________,___ __----- �_1'111 �,,� I I 1�_____ 'I', _;�___ '11� \\ ____�________ ,"'111 _____ ________�_____�_ -_ - ----__ ___----__------ ______ I 1 I I . ,�,� 1� � __ ,;1 I '' ,17�� � ` �", ____ ____�_ ,_,___�' - , � I " ,� ,7'"- "__",,� I-,- _� �_____, -�_�____ �___ - -,---- __ 'N , 1�P � , �', � " I'_---__ ______�___ _,____� - I �,<'0'0, ,, , , '' \ \ ____ -_ _11 ,,,�, ,� - ,� , I � ," " , I ____ -------------- ---, ------- - - � _ " _� ,�, � � - , I �,�,\_' �";g , 11 \ - , - I � 11�� :111; -- _,_1__111111____ NORTH E� ,,� , , ,��z��������'ll""Il""I'll""�,,� ' ,,�A� I '�,`,� �,,',�� , ,�...... , , - �", �_ 11 - _ ,,� , 'j-�', ,,IZI I _� i�, , ,�",, ,,, ,, �" ,�......I 1 R�,�,�,',`,,��', , �1,1 � 0:!"�,,,,,,,�,,, 14�,,, -1 I , ic� a, \ ____ I _ - 111 "I - "7!Y i "' "', " P�'�p�'�� I , , "' `___ _� i "- IN ��;,',�6A;10,�',,"�, '\1 I m1k�, ,� ,� ____ _____ I ,", -1, __ 11' ' ` �'j ,��,p, !"111,111,_'111,11i, ___ ,- ", , I n �', , I "I" �# "I _� 1 '1� -,-.. ,____,_� ____ _____ ,r\,"�//�� PLAN � � ,�:`, " , � , I -�,, - ��,,,i� , , ,�1', \ , I ,,���t%i,,,,,,,,� , \�,', '', I '� I", I I�",��,,,��,��,�',�"",-"""����"""������, " ,� ,� ---"--,---,--"--,---------�,,�-'--�-.�-----I ,\ __�__�____.________ ----_,, --_----, -----_I---__---__,_ , � , 11__�_ ,"", " �1, -, -, "� _� "'� � , ----------- ',,�,_1 \ �,� � 'l �1111 ......�(""qp """ '�', _____� -_ ,- ________,__�_ ---__,____ _______�_____,_�,_ I , , __,,,_,____,__ ,"\_� \," " ...�� '_ , ,",",�_, , , '' I'll -,, , V11,; , ""''" , '' I I, " , ", ", ,�, _'� �� , , �_�'_', '11"', -,--' "I , " , � a , - - , ", __...______,____ - _" ," " 1-1 _________ , - ____-, ___ I �... ���_ ------, ----__, ____", _ ,�,'' 1. I I ' ' '' , 0`_,"�`-,,�� - __ ______, ---I- - -_ __ � ,,, � , � , ,�,� ,,, " �,�,��,",',"��,,"',",�,,,��"'�l,," ,,, -_ " ___1 I �� : � -T , , I ________ --_ I - -_ Ml�'� , ,,� I ",", "I ___', :,'_______,1 ___ ___________� i �', ,��,,,,�,i�,,,, N�, 11 ___- ___1 . - I �,� �, I . I I ,I,'" " ' "" _6,�&,,,k...... ,��,, , r__71____'_ I � �--,-\ -I I �� 11,, 11 11 111,j� "\ , '' ` - 1, '' _:�1'11 I 11", 4� 11� .11�� 1�', �__ �_, I , _____� � I I ��`,4'"I,'M��1,I � ,,,,�,�,,"�,I f " ,�`,�,�',,, �,"I", ,--,--,,, , �n � �; ",,,, ".-, `I ",�, , I � , "",, , " ,ik,0, IN _11111�1'1", --.---.- ------,-..-,-, .---'---------------,' - 0 1 , V,11_1111131 :7�'j '_'�. - ____1 , ` I 11 11 4, I ____ ;-,� I ",'11,111, ��, -c-,� " '' "", , NO", H �' iqlp��17,...... " 11 - ,,�,1,,,-"";: ,,V""g'P1,1, '�', I L 'i" � � � , _-, I ,:,� """ ," I __1 , � `,,�!,,,,`,','�,O I I " -,, - I"I I���',,,,'�,,����-,,,�,,�,�,,,,,���',�, 1",,��""'i",�',:,�N,1, .", -,_��, - \", 1_� - � 'I, 11 ,,, , ,I , \_,__ I � ", _,I � , �� "" - �, I � I �I'll"I � �' ��--,,,',,,-"Ai,i"!"i"""'l,�`�',! ,�, ,,��',,���,,� , I - , 114 ---L',, , ,� ' I's�, � 1__,__, /' �, , '�,'L��,A� � , I , " - - -�", � ,__ , , , I��,_r��,�:� 2- 1111�," ,� `�,�,,, , I \ I � \ - �,r��,�:`��`, - H '__ ,_,__�,' __f,_'__ - / "' ,��i�,,�,,���,`,� � - � �� ' ' � �, ' ' I I ,�,,r��T:,� , __ _�",� -1'-,,'];",!,!, � , , , 1, I �/ , � , ; � ,1 9 1:r" I , , 0 1, z I A ,;z:1", I "'�'`"I`�'"" "' � ,,,11 I� _11��" �1� ,,,, I� I , � I� "", ,i I , I I I- ���� ,", , , , ,I - I I I I 11 11 I, I�11_1-11-11�`11 ��:i � ��11K�-�1110 ,,,�, � ,,,, , ,,, 1 ____, I I I 1��,�"1,, , I I -,11 � �,, � I r I ... -,I I 1,1,"i 1,-I -1 , ,11�'R'11`r"I'll:,,:,�, , �, ,�, ... �I, / � -,� I I � , , ��, � -i,,I ,�, ,g,,, ,, -,; � , , I � " ,�, ,-� , �I I � , I �� r "� � , , � , �, - , I, � , , -` , ",� � , / I r-_,, , j,,, ��,, , , 1, r , ,,,�,,, , --___,----- �� �,_�� , ,-�,, 9 r , � , ",",,-� � � t - - P � I ... --,--, I , I I I �z"N!�,,!!_,��z,, 9 9, , , 9 1, I � ", � ,�",,�"",,, ,- �,�"� ,I ��',�,��1�1,1111' ,2,, , , I r , I I, ___ __ _",,, , ,, 9 9 1 � � I �� �'n�, � ,,, ,, I,_ �I r, I 1 9 9 1 1 , ,I ,9 � 9 119 11 I I � '� , ____ -11""1777 - " Ft7t ��',,t� __I _', - � � z , ,,_1� ,, ,,,,:, 9 1, I ,":��::,,':�,", , ��, ,� ,,,, �� � � , , / - "I I 0� �,,� �I 1", ,,,,, r � �", 7""'7,I,�, ; , ", , ,", , I I " 1XI, , ,:, S u rveyo r: ," , " , " , , , ""'' : � :, �_ , , "-',, ,, ��� , ��, - , __ " 77, 7'777�� " � �__,q�_. , ,-.......�, � I 11 . k , , ,, 9",� � �,�,,,,��I"",'�,`"",,�"'��r,'.�'r ,",, ���,��,'�,��r r r� / ,I ,_ ,,, , . _ ,�, _ ' I ---, �, " , _," � ,,I�,��,:��� �r ' I I r " 7� " ..9 9 9 9 9- 9 1 1 1� ...-,r,r.r.r,r,r� I �' r r �I 11 I "��,,: � � �',_ 5��,�;;,� 9 9 1 �� �,, � � 1 9 1 1 �_��, �� ��/�,, I r -1 --- -� 9�-9 , 9 9 , I , ... �, 99"I r �r�� , �,� � . ,, ,""�," �I I � '�""'"�'�'' :'� "","', �,��,���� 9 � --l"", 1� � ,,I� �I I I ,, ,", ", ' - , ,,-,", I�,,9 ,,�,� r ' ,��,, � I I - -, � , � �,, ... �r I��0" Zrr I I I ' ,� I , I .�-�'r 1. �, , , ,, , , ,��,�,,,,,,,� 9 9�, ,,,"� ,r,'r I . I :,���, �I��I z: I I ' 9 1 �,, .������11 , , -,"",," ", , I I I I � , 1 9 1, 11 �,�� �- \� � ,�, J M Land S u rveyi ng � I 111�I 11 I ";��,,4,,�,,,9�� I �� ,9,,", I-," V �, , I I I " "- , I,I 1 9 "-<�'�j',�,',",' ,�, � 11 I r 11 ��,,,,,,�,'�,'�7--------,r, 9 , I��-,��I , ,, �I , ,,I I I / ,,, - -----_ , �k�- !�j�j 1��"',_",:''r,�,��'��, I � ,,,, , ' ' , ,,,,�, � , � ,� , , r I , , � ,� I - i I � 9 1 1 , �,�"I',�"""�'r:'�j"r '," � r ' ;�k ': X, I--,' __-, .-T ,� I , I I I '�` I � 9 � 9 1 " �� , 9 � ,,-',,-,',",-; � " �,,� , �,"-I I� �_,,��:";,.I--,�;,r�', ��,�, �� 9 ," '�',. 9 9 e , , I I I 11� -11�,I I 11 I I I I I I 9 I I I,,,, , ,, ,, I r I ��� �I I 1 9 ��I__I ,"r ' '- r''' " 1,11 r , __11111��� I �I I , "�-,,, ,,� 1 9 9 1 9 , �� I , . I r � ,,,, � ,I I I ,�,, ,,�k,��\ -I 11 I , ,,� , �,�� ,,,, �,:9�,�, i,,�,,,��� ;� , k,,M M,z� I I ' ' ��1, ,�,��'�p,,, ", " , W, PO Box 1408 ", ,"" ",- ,�,�,,�M � -, , ",,"", , ",, " , '61, r �r� '' ' ' , ,�r, -----_____,___ " , " � � ' I __1 ,,, , ,� I 1, , ' / I " , 1'��""��i���"',�':r�����r�"�` 7 " , , , r -�,� ���� , , ,'� I I , -- --- '\ "",,,, , T - I � ,,��\, �li r ''r "__, " n �- ,,R'I".,I�,Z,�, � I I ��9 , �, I � _�'�� ' '': , ""�,,"_r - , �]�,� ,- ,9 - I I -�,,,,,,!�,,\��I,R,��,,,�,,� , , ,, ,z� , ,��'%' �j 9� ____________�-_ �9�,z�91_1" '", � � � � � , I / ,"' , ,�� � 9, 9,���� � �,, , , I ,� 9,, ' `��_ - � . , - -, � I � I � , I I --, ,, _,' "I" "''-'"' I � �, ,� x / � 'i ,k, ,,9� , 9 1 ,,��, ,I ,111���1,"',11'.,,-,��,,r r I % "��,�,�r:,��, , ,�,�,� ,� ' '', , ,,� ,,9,� �-- ��_,! ",,,'I "', ,I �,,"I,,, ," I I,���, -" " � , ,�,"'I",\ - 9 9 �"i,",,."�I ,, � � , ,��",i",�_�, ,, \ 1Z �, ,,,� , � ,,, ,,I"\1,I, , , ,, i.I.,",\\� I, I , " , _ .....\1�,,, , I � ,,,�,, I" - ,, � ,, ,i ,I,, . III,"""n,,,,,,,,"",�,,,""',,,� \ , "'i,,"�",I,"I i 1, I ,", ,�-� ,,," ",,,,,,� ... ,,�, ,,� � ,1. "/' �,-,\ ,��, ,�,;E�� �, , , � � 9 , r , , , ,, ,",-, --,,,, - , -I I I I : I � , ���,',�,� 9 �_11_1�",,,� , I ",,, ......., , I 9 , , 9 � ��,,',',',,�� 9,, "I 11'�,",�" " \ * t ,_�'�',,_-, , " ,I ,- , ,, ,", ,,,,"" , ,, __, I`- I- I , � , , ,, ,, , _�_,__ � , ftw ,�"',�� , ,�"�,`, " , �, , � I " "" Q,rr"r �� 1�11 I /`�, '�_,,", 1-1 " , " ,"I" ,� "� " Smithtown, NY I I , , , ,�_j- , 9 : I ,�,, � . , , I I I��� I r 5 �q �K �� I z��,, 1 9 , I I " , ",,,,�, ,��,,,,, ,�� � , . �\� , ' '���,��' U, 1 ��"', ,�,,��""I"9"��'I'�,9-"Ikll�'llI I I 1 9, ,", ", ,�, I 1 9 , �,!,��"", ,,,�,,, ,,99 ''' ',1�"�'j, "'��"r��"' �,:�: ���,, I I ,� 9 9 , ,, , r,� , I Ir '� I r � / I r� ,�,�,��,,p, 9 , --, ,, ,,,,� , I r I r 9 9,9 9 11 � .�,��I 1,� 9� I , ,, ,,,, � � 11 1 9 �, r kr,_, 9 '\ \X'-4,,�\ (.0, 9 N, :�,,,����,,: , �,� �,9�i""",9,��,,��,,,'�.".",�""�� -�"ii"-,'�",,,,, , �� �, ,, ,,, 63 1.7 2 4.483 2 � '!r .rrrrr 'j�,'�',9, � � , 9 � �!� � � I ��,q � �,,, ",,� , 9 i � , I 1, '1% , , �, , ,,, ,� I 1��, ,,�,�,���� \ I I I , � , , 1�1- ' ��,",'�', ,, ,,I" fl�� I �, ,�"'�", �, , , -____1 " � I , ,,��':����, �� � " _____------^' \ �",,,,,� I � , ,�'�4'�1,I", �,, ",, 9 11 '',,�r �, "I '��""'",: � �, , ��,",," "I " I � " , I, I,,, ,�, � , ,I��-"-,�,��,�,,I P 5,'!�� _',",r," ",9 0 9 t�, � , I I � ,, r �',r 9 1 . ,�,, -1 , j r I -, , ' , , , ����,,,�,,,�,,n�,m,,�-,,i,",�,"",:"� I I � I ,:�" ����,'Z."m -;� �I 1, I,9 1 1.,,r ��`��rj r , ,1�� I / �-�xg,m�,w,q,w,��,� , I �r '� , , "," , \<n�) , , , e � - I I , � ,� ,, ,,,�I - I, I I I �,� ,�`, ,,,,I i, , ,�� ,��, � , , ,,, ," � 9 ..1 r 9 r 9 r'. I '' ,�"�',('��"��,�',� , � � �,: :�", "',,,,�,"'t,',��,,,� ",&'�,',`,,",,��,,,, , ,�,, �k,�, ",, � - ,,,," _ rt, A ,,,�,�,�nii�--�,,aw',�6*��,� I`��"!�' ,, ",� ,� : I , � $��"`,,g",,i,,�,,,"r,�,j,", _,11 K , ,�,, ,,��,,� ,� .1 9 9 9 �, 1�"" --�,�1 1 """`�_':��",9 r , 9 9t9.11,9 "",,_'.,,'z� �,v, 9, �,,z_ Z:'`��",,-,�,11',�r ,�, I I I,,, ��� , "'o) � &,`9�9'��,;� "" _9,,, , 1� "" �,J,',,�,,�I,, �_, I `, , I I"I ,, . 9 1 � � M I �',,� , � , , ,% I ��� _ , t , I � 'r ��,, ,��,�,,��i",�,'��,,z', 9�����,,�ai"�',,N � ,"',,,�,,,,g ", �, k'1�1�1'1�11'>,a 11 ��,"�,` , ,�"�,� , �1111 110 I,, "�,, I�, \ . � ,r j r� -�', I I I,I I-r � 9 1 9 """r_ _',_��,,, , �/�� I -� - I ,'��,I ': "9� , ,,\�" I "\ " 'V�r 1`,,;��`�'��9�,'r,",����� '�1 III", - " I " " , � �,�n��,��,I � ��:: �e e�111'1�,W-,�� ,,,,,,��,; I I 1 9 Z� 'I',� , , ,p I I I I ,,I"��,I e� I � 9 ,,�, 9, ;� ` � -I I � �- I I I "I"I'la"11,111,64:.��,�,`,�x,��,"t�,,�, "r;;, �" ,,","',"'� 9 I," ��� ,�,,,,��:, ,� ,, ,, ,,, \, , : I �': , , ' ' � 9 ,,9�',_'�',i_Drl��,, � � 91, I �,11�-"',','_111'1�R,§1'14'I",1 9 9 " ,� I �I 1, � � �",�, �,!�`�"',"-�",ag�,�',,'�--',,��'Itr�,��'r,�",I'r,�, " �, ��,�,'" , � , ---,,,_''k " ,� �9 i��,,, 'I',, ��, �"",I! I �',,"",'�� il", , I I � I �,, � ,:,,,99� :,,, - -�--"_' _"' ' ' ' '�`� ,'I .� I" ` I 1, 0 ,,�,�,�'�,��, 9" / � I �W��, � � �I I , I ,��',\',�,,,, r 9 1 1 11191N 1"I 11 9, ,9, I I r I :,�,,,9 1 9 9 -, ,�t � , �"" , ,����nl -, �1 9 1 1 9 9 1 1 9 � 9 ,_ �' ,,��`, "\ eflillkfl -", t I ,"' ' I -��,,,,��""i'ii�,,,",,,,,,,-,,,�-",9,,� � I 1 9 9 , """",��,,�'I'�N�""I"���l',, � i"�`''� , ,,� 'q"'q ,r���,�"' I '� �N A ,,,,, ,--,- 1 9 (D "'� - �� "'%�V,_�,��"'� I I:, ,k AR ___ 11119 %) ," �""i",'.,,."""r r, , , ,,"r,,' ,�' ", i , % , , - , ,,,, I I , , ��, , 9 1 r 9...r 9 r r r r'r, 9 9 � I�I ,�I��',:� 9 � " """" "'" , "j,_��'"',,r", � / 11 1� "%g , I r � 99 9,9 - -'_""'""-"""-"' ,,:,,,, 9 r r , �,�t'11, �11 � � I . "�,� ,,,,,1�, �,, 9 � ,9,''r_,"'rr � �,g,4�,,"P,�,�,1�,,, ,�11'11`"'��m-�Z- I , , , I ," , ,s ", ", � ,, I ,-, I ``�, , I I I,, " , , 9, 9,9" ,�9 1 �,,,I 9 91 1 1 9 1 1� �'i�� , 11,1',�', I , , ," 1- Ir,"�,,� ,,,, r �9 k� ��, ,� '��"",, ','\,��"-,�`��-','�� �� I ,1 9 4�� �, ,,,, , "� -,-,, I � ,""�",," I, ,,� ," , ,-,,�,:'J,,,,P�,�,,�-,"�,\�g!"""""j",, ,,, I 1; _� "" r 9 9 9 ' , , , ",,��, � , ,, I I I I I I 0, ,,, 9 I ,, " " ,, ,,,"' ", 1.9.9 1 1 r�I/_` , , ,, ,""" r I , I I r ,,`- 11 I �, r A � I i , 1, - � �,'I,r ---,,, � , , ,, '. 'j i ,Z"I'll",!i "�', __ �,,-- ---- ,, ,�� ,, ��4 " 9 1 jj�i�,, , -,-,, .�� , , ,,,,,§ffl,2' , 1111RI"I'll,"I" ",!�"" _ , , ",,,",\ I � ,�� , '-" ,?11 9 ,__,_" , 1 11�,,�9- 1 1� 9� I�:�,,,,���,,,,�,,,,',',',�""","�',,,�""",��"";��"', ""' ,, , ",,i"�� � � _ I � ", ,,,9 , , �" , 9 ,,"j" , 9 ,� �" ," ,, r �I"I 11`�W\ _\ �,1"",�� ,1 9" � 9,�,, _� ,� I �:� � S �``""�,,,,-,,,,,2 `,",;;t� ,�I,�, M �0""I �,�,q _,_" � , �� ,,,, "� � , \,.fta 9 � 1 9 4�� ,215",-,!"i-,,'; ""go", 0 , �� , , , ,�I � I� ,, ,�� 11 F Z� -i'jitt"',�i,"','I �� , , , , 1 11A,111111�N , 4� , __,, , , � 1, .," *, �, I'll , , "' , �,� ,�ii �_ ,,9,,� I � ,, _111111V�l , ---" , "" , I , , , �, , � ,, "flffirl', ,q ""', Site Data: -9 � � ", I , 9,-, ,,', _._� I ,I I I I I 11� �Z,�e,,","-,, ,z,, ,�� , , �, ,� r" I zz�I�� I � , 1�'_ ,"", , � ,R , �, � I X , I I I ,, ,�, . � I ,"', : I I , "R 1,��� ,q�,�,f'�"`,�,',�,�,�",'���,,"r�"'r,"�,""",,,"',p","""�!, I I I �,,,"'�,,�,��,:�'�, ,-- �r� I ", ... " , ,,,� "'P"",11', M��d�I- "", --,-, -,"",p," ,, , ,��,�,"11 Ili, �1�,I 0�_'�11���,��,�"�,, ,,,, , ," p , ,,,,, 9r 9 9 � I � ,r I -,,,,�,,i , ' 'Q �1'1,1�,,, - '11- , �', A ,�,o, �" , � I 1 9 �� \ �, I ,,"� ,, ...9, , , 9 r r '�` 11,�'�"`�' I ,I : ,,9, - , , � i"� ,�, ", ,, \,,`� ' ' 1,� ", , '1�,5`$ " 11 �,"�` "�,`-,,,� , � , ,�,;�,, �-I -" 1Q,'`,� J,���","",��' , I , �, ," � ,� ","� I r I 2 ,' '�1' �,�,�",. _ _',Ill?11\1',"I 1� ,,,,�,,, r!,,� 'IP"I 101�,,,,,,,,-1 ""','i--��,"","',"".g,�,,,,_"�rrl, , I , ,, , , �,, , 1,111, , 11 I,, , ,� ," � '" t : (a �, , , ,,�,��'����q , � ...� � 1�9, ,r - , , , . �k�Q,�W`, 1", �?jl,��,�",'�',�,',�\,,�',', ,� 11: -" �, �"""":��9 , "I r _ __ _,_ �, I I 9 - - ,;I A"", ,I ,_,. _ _ I -I g , ,� 11 �,,�5k""': 9 - , , , I_fi,J11'i1,` \�� '" 1'1�'�' I - ", �� I t ,j ,_ ,-,�-1, ,�" , �, r _ ,, , "� I � _" , , 41" _,� " , ii qii�,� , �_q...r ,� 91,19� I I I " � , _ , SOW I 000-61-01-15,2 & 1 5.5 1 � I 'r" ,�11 `11�"," "'", 11 �", ,r'/ \ � , N ____ -- �, I I I - � I I � I , ,1� �; , ,��r 1� 11", z I " , � I I �� ,,, - , � 9 1 , , ,� 9 1 1 3 1 � -,�,_I � , , ' ,�zz�z�,�� - I i"I,"Ill � � � I , I ��� I I I ' r r_' ' ��� � 91'�,' -, ---I'-- �Ml�, 1,;, ," I , 1 9 1, "'' ,",� ,-� ����' "' , r,rr, ��_ I I, 9 1� 1, � � k" : \ ,�"r,"'..r � Zon ng: H B I I I j r'9 r 1, 1�_ 1 9, ��,"k"�, ,"- ,�,,:, �, "" � , "� ,, ,�...�...... � � � I I 1-1 "I'� " -I,%,-- I, ,"" ,� 1, � z � , \ �N , ��,� `� r, r �, � -"',1,9 1 !"O'�"� '�' I" ' , 19, 9 ,�,,,,- , ,�,�,��,I� ,,�t �_ ���",-,',"',"�� 11 I I",,� ""4 ,_',11 I , �� '' ' I r � ,r\ \ : I ,�,�,�,i9��,, , , � �, ,p,fr__"�',r� � ,� " , � " I ` I . - " I'll "I'll �9%',".?' _ " I 1- , , " , , , , I Lot Area� 55,894 SQFT(1.28 acres) `"I � � I , ,9 :'� 1 9 ,I � �y 19 9,,,� � �, ,,, �.......� 1�_, \ �� ,_,--�-, 1 9" , " , 9 X 1, � � � �I � ,, _____ I'_1 � ,�;,I 1, ,, ,:",", ", �,, �,I ,____�4 1 �� � �� � ",�91 9,, ,9 9 , I �� ,-,, , I � ,I I,�,, I ,�,�, , � " � - ,,,,�,,,�',,',,,,, ���,��,,,,,�',,,,,,',�,,�,��,,i_" I / � � 9 1 1 �1��,9�,,,�, I � 11 -1- , , �I ,",��", "' � I I , � / 'I,,I I I � ,",,,", , ���I,� I 1-1 I , - � \1 9,;1.1� �� r I r, , " �� I I I 11 I I I I , I I I , "I , I I I\ I \ _ ,"" "�, , 9 �11 / � , , " ,19 1,�� W`��,,`t,� I ,r ,r,, r"'_,",,r, 1� I I" r r, I I I � -, � " �t '�,r ,�r r," I � � ,���, ���,, \ � ,9 9 1 - ,I r I I , , �,� , , , 11-1 -, ,� , , \-�__ , : % ,'�111'1� r ��r�,� �� ,�,'*�", .'r�'� � �� , ,_' 1 __, " t � r I ,�" , 9 / / I , , ', ;1� , � ,"" � I � �r , � � ,n �,I ----------- 1,", �11__�, " 1, , "I �, ...,'r 9 1 1 - ''r , � "r ,�n, �1�z,�� " , I , , I ", " > ", ,- I I., � �9 1 1 9 "_�, 'N, ,, �aN_�, �r'�'r�� ��" k ,�r"'' � % \11111,,"'11111 I ��n��:_-,�,_� I,11,�� '��, r 1 9 1 . __,�� __ - --__/ __ - - I ; ,,,� ",1 r' ',,, ,,� I� r � � 9 � ,\ u,Ag�, 1111�1, I � r' I , �-I-I I I r I � -- .r-0- --9r\",,,,__ �, ,'I _1� �' ... ., ,� '99q , � � I- , I ,",I � I I 11 �,�,,�,,r�,��,, ,�", , \1 I , , _ _ . � � � I I ,� _��,,r,, 1 9 11 's I __i 1_�, ,,", '�9 9��99`99`1"''�'-9'r , --,.1�� " 'g, 1, 9 � r ., .I-1-- I- , �, �, x _91-1 z " � "'q, ���"' 9 9� ,_� � ,"",�.r , - 9 : � I I � ,, 1 9 - �`-�,� " V , "�',, I � , "', " ,9 �',","'k",",��� ��,,�,�,�4,,,,,,,-,,,,,, i4,,� / I , � , -_, � 9- - - �710�,a,"__ �,,, I � I� � ' z 1, -Ili ,9�,15 , , I I �...\, . 1 9 � 91 . ,I - ,."'�n'��'' r , I I-, - -,__�,�-�- ,-��� � "I 9 1 1 - I ��z":'% 1--__ ___ . 9 � � ; "' , _�, ,-_l,,.,. ,--______. _�. � �, I , _,___, ........,.r,rr rr �._999 9 9 1 � ,� ,9 � � _"__9.__....I 11 �1, ", ,I I " � \ , i��9""'�,�,�'�', - w I � I I : :: : 9 99,9� : � / I -�,�,,� 't�, ,,"I 9 z r __9 I ,��" ,!'i"'aiv,", ,�,','i,, �,'��I,"",", . I z 91 9 I , , , 1 I r � ---- - : , ,:: � \' L I I I., "�-,,, -�,�',, ,�� I 11,�..�1�1 ill, 9 1 -L I � � - _,� --r. \1 It w � 1-11, __ �I � I " ,,�����,,� , ,,, . . � + \ 9 7,-_/, , ,� ��I '� - '_", 9 � I I - I I ,11 11 , 9 � r � I I �_�Q9 z 1 99, ,-, I I,� I � ,� - I I 1 9" � r'9� - 11 . . I � -99 - I - .- 9 9 1 - -_------- ---- .._____.�.",,-_,_ .- I" / I 1� , I: , , I 11,� i r 1911- ___ � � ` , I '-T-r � � ,11� 11%,,". I - �",'-"";_ _J�/ -,,-/ 9 ! 0 __�,11 I �',", I �: �,�� I I , - I 11._1.Z___ f __ , , ,� I r 1. , �,"I , �,�," 9 1 1 1,"I "I ,�I L R �",�'_,Z�,", , ,, i = N ..........r.-1 1 9-I,�--" I, ___-I-,,, �r 9 r 9 ,�q I ���,", -------- I I N� ��,iz I I 80 � 9 1 1 � -1 �I ': �9 1 r r 9 . r . ,I 1__�', f .i I I � :9� � r 9 r L__j 9 9 9 �] �, ��9 � 0 � 9 9 � :� 9 � 1 9 1 � %.I % I l , r 9 9 9 � . 9 9 1 1 � I I I I. � r r 9 9 9 1 1 1.,� ..� . 9 1: r r. �� ��9� r,r .r � � I r � � " __� I I :. �r � r. 9 1 1 r � � , . r r I .. . I , � 9 9 �, I � ...1 9 L_� �, I"",,��1","N"",,'!�� `�`�`�`�`�`��`�...........'mill,I I , , r 1 9 . r. ��: 'r. I:., r I�. . � I r r 9 9.: 9 9 1 9 1 "'""��I` . 9 9 � 9 ,,,�"I"',""'�"',,, 9 r r . r r 9 ",�1,,��l � I � r , , ��' co r. 9 1 r r r r r r 9 9 1, :, %:.: :I % � r r r � �. r I ..9 .9 9 ,I I � I "I-,, I I, I, I�, . 1 9 r 9 1 9 1:, � � �I � r r r I . 9 .� 9 1 . 1 9 9 9 1 9 � I �r r .r r r� r 1 9 1 .,. 9 r r I . r . 9 9 9 9 r �� 1 9�1 r ,: 99 � 9 . r.. .19 9 9 .9 :9 9 9 9 1 9 1 9 9. 9 99 1 r: %: r 9 - �', � I �:� 9�r r r 9 � I � I �:. , %:. � r r rr r r r . �� I r r r � I� I I..I .9, � 9 1 � %:, 9 9:9,� ..9 9 � 9 9 9 9 � I �, %::- % �:' : 9 r I 11 9 .9 9 919 9 1.1 9'19 9 9 9 9 ...9 99 9 9 9 1 1 1 9 � r r r. �. ... I r. 9 1 1 1 9 ", I 1 91 . �:, 0. r � I I I . I 1 99 9 1 1 1 9 1 1 . ,. 9 9. ,. ,r . r 99 � I r . .. 9 , 9 9 � . r r 9 9 1 1 19 ,9 . � r . . � 9 � r 9 % r r 9 9 1 r 1 9 11 r r r r r r . "I 11� , . I r,: �:, ': r r � r: .9 :. 9 9 .9 9 . r -F . 1 99�9 .1 � I�:. r r:r r, r: I, "";I- :r I I , r r 1 19 9 1 19 �.. �r. r r 9 1 r.1, :9, . :r %: r,: r- i .., �I 1 9� � 9 1 %9 9 :. � I % %�. ��9 1 ------_ , 1�� , .. %. r r .I, . 9 r r � 9 9 1 �,. . r: . : : . 9. r r � 1 9 . I % , : I I I. � .r % % ���: ., �:, r.� r., .. r.. . �r, : �� �., %r r r I r' r� 9 9 1 � � r , I r . I �. .r I r I . I. :� � r .r � I�. r:. 9 � � r 9 9. 9 1 1 9� .1 -r r r rr. ... rr: �:r I 9 9 %�:, %,: , __---' \ - 9 r �:. 9 � I 11 I .� :9 ..r 9 r, :., r � - .1 � r r ,r I 11 9 1 . 9 1 9..1 9 9. 1.. 9 9 .r 9 1 9 �r -r. ..9 9� r I:, %: �, . 1, � � � I�� I 1 9. . 9 1 1 - � . r r � r r r. r rr r r. - r I r 9 r rr r �rr .� 9�. ... %. %9 � 1 9� _� ____1, . . 9' 1 9 :�I :�- r 9 i, � � I I, . .. ��., -r'-r r:r. ,r 9 1 .� � � � I � :: ,, � r I I I I: 1 9. � I r r r r r 9 .. � ,-- I 9., ,� ��� � 9 ,r. 9 r r .1 .,. 9 r �r I ��. . r. r : , r%: � �. � 9 9 1 1 � � r 9 r r� I 1 9 1�I .. Ir r GRAVE L DR IVE I.r r ..9 r. r r . � r r r � � . : �� r r 9 I" J,;�� '�: ,r �:. r: r 9 � 9 1, r r r 9 r � r . � � � r� . r 9� r r r r r r �r r r r �� 9 1. 1 9 .� � r. r 9 r /� - , ,I� r, : �9, I:, �: i -r: : -r .,r 9 ...I �9. r �� . ..r I.r.�r 9 r r 9 r9�.�r I %I 9 I r . r I . . r ,: .,:9 . I,I I. I.. I, r, � �. . 9 � 9 91. ,9.%.9.. 1 9 . r�r r I r r � �� � �. �� .I ::r .r: 9 r r r r�: .r %r.. .r �r r r r I � :r r�r 1 9 1 . r' . I r r 9 1 1 . IT- _ --9. -�. . I � r 9 9 1 r . r r r r I I r 9 . :r. -:. -:r �. �9 .r� r : . .�� . � . � . � r r r r r r �r r r r r r r r r r 9. r r r r.. r r I� r r. :r. ,. . r r 9 --- r. ..: -,"------,:--_-- 9 9 r r r � �I �I. ..r r 9 9 .�.,r r r 9 �� I r r �� , . --. �:. � 9 . ��,r I . I.9 r- I �r .r I�� ,:r r r 1 9 9 9. r.::.,. � 9 :. :. �: � i r � � � I�� � � , �9 , � I � I I %9 . .. -..-_0_,41�-�� � � r r r r � r �:. -r -r.9 .r r 9 � 9� � ::. ..9 1 � .. I I.r .r %r I ,r � ' r '�� � I... .1 9 � �. %�N r �. r. r. 9 r . I I I .� 't �� r r r. :1.I,�:. �:r �r 9 1 1 1 ,.. r � � I � r r r r r.� � �I I I -, -;.�9--------9 , 1 9 9 , r. r, I r I r 9 . . r .I r .1 . , r I � �.� � 9 % 9 r � I r 11 I I.....iiiiii rrrr,r r 11 I"�,,9,111, 19 1 , _____� %.� %r � . 9 � I r. � r. r � r r I I I I -7- I . .r. r� r r r r ��. : : r 9 9�� -I. I�� . �.: , �..� 9 1 . ,. ., , i 9, .r , :r �� 9 . r � r 9 9 9 1 1���,�,2,1, ,� - � r 9 9 9 9 r I r r 9 1 1 . 9 � 1 9 � � �: �: r � I I I . .: I � :. 9 . r I"I'll I � r r � 1 9. -----_ r r I I .. � � � . r 9 9 �9 r , 9 r . . 9 . � I I ( + 9 � . . r � � . r. �:r r r r.r �, �. . 9 9. I . : �: � r� r r 9 r � 9 �9 i 9 1 1: � �. �� � �.� . , . .19. �� � 9 r r r :, . �, � 9 mi �. , %, 9 � � r I :�- . %.. r r � r � r r r r r r ���I r. r. � .I r... 9 9 --r, .r r, � ��I r r. r r� r r � I I :� .I �, �I r I I 1 9 9 9 ., I . .. ,I . I � . 1 9 � 9 9 (0 ____� I . 9 � ..� .� r 9 9 1 .I N r 9 r I �: r 9 9 r r � 9 r ,I r I �.1 r I � . r ��I . 9 r. 9 . I, r 9 9 1, r r r I I .,. �� �� � 9 1 9 . .9 9 .. . r L P J --� � 99 1 ' .I .. 9 , %� �I r r r r r .,� � r r r r r � � :: r:: : . I� I. r I r r r r r r . I I. I :_ :� .-, ��.� � r r I . 9 . r .. I r --- to r � :,r r r 9 1� . r r 1 9 9 r ��, �.:9 r r r I : � .. � �: :r I.:r ..r 9 .r r r r r 9 1 � 9:9.r : 9 1. 9 9 9 1 1 9 9 . 9 � ,�� .I �, 9 9 1. .. 9�9 .,r ----4��---�- I �.� � . I : �9 � �,��.,�I :9 . � � r I I--�---,--.--.- . , �� , r : � . r � I, I , I . 9� r r r --.p�_ - �, %, %. r. %.r r . � �r r r r �, I .� . --I-- ______� �I 1 9 9 �� %r r. �. 9 .r r r r. . . :� �:r r 9 �. �,� ,,: ,.: .: 9 9 1 1�I I :9 9 9 9, I, r,., .:9. 9 1 � � 9 9 :.9 9 . :r : � r .. r. :r. �: .9 1,I I... I�I ��. , 9%9 r: 9 r r r r . r I -1__04����*����r I , r r ,'I r r �r 9 r r r r r r. I � � r - ...__---,,,99 '�,_�,,, -, � �� I 1 9 .9:, :. -------- r r 9 � � I � %:r r. r r 9 9 �, I, r , �,9 el I r� r � r r . . . . � r 9 -r. 9 . 9 r � r ' 9 r r . . % r 9 r . i ,"'�, � , I r I . r r I I .. :, .. -I 9 -_r� ----�-----, -) '. 9.9 9 1.I I.: . I 9 . -r.r 9.. .r r : r.,%. r:�r.: r � . 9 .9 1 1 �. I 1 9 1, ,.1 9 9 9 . ..9, 9 9. . I ... 9 9 9, 9 r I 1 9 . . . I r r �: .,I �9 9.: 9,.1 9:I I, ..I �...�,%I.,.�. 9,I. 9 �.1 9, r 9 r 9 , ... . r.. I. r r r � �,- 1, �, r .r r ::r r 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 9 9. 9 � 9 1 1 1 9 9.9 : � r ,I .�9 %%. r r� r r %: �:. ., . ... 1 9 1 .I I,I ..I .9 9 :.r r r . �� ., ..r r. �. r. U, . I � r r ", I ., 9 , . ..' :. rr r r I :. , 9 9 1 1 1 9 1 9 r I r � I I I �... ..� .. r.r. I: r r r 1 9.I .I I, .: :.I 1 9 1 .,� I I .,99 9 .9. %9 r r r r I %.� �.. �.� �.� r.r .. . : �:I �r� r r r r ,.9 � , .- U ",,,� � ,,,-,,,,,,- ,,,� "I 9 ,: � 9:.:,�9.' �r. r r :r .r 9. I I �:I r � I, r , 0 , , , � , I I � , r,, ,, ,, I ...� � r I ,. r. r 9 .I ,9 ... .9.: I��I r,: r, 9. 9 9 . , I, 9 . ,I . r N I.I .. :%.��,�.. : r. r - r r � :r %:r , . . :r r r I �� � . �. 9. I. r 9 .� : .I �r r � %1 r � r � 9 �,9 : � :: . �:: . :9 1 . . r r r.. r r r r r ,r .9 r�. . -r .. 9 r r r .: 1 9 :. �:1 9 9 1-11_ ,,,,, --A ___�,_ I � /, r r r , r �I I ,r r r r 9 1. r � ' 9 . I, : 1 9 .., r r r r r r . :I :. I .� .I ... 9 r, :9 : ::, :. I��. r %:r r r r r � I I I I I . 11 9 � _ � r, �. �9 9 :,9 :: r .. � ,%: ':��':r I ,r �r. r rr r � . r � . � : . 9�� .� .� r 9 1 �9 9 r. r.. �r r �: 9.1 9, : :. 9.I �. 9 1 �: 9 , .I .%,�..:�: %:: r%:�r r r:,I r r. r. .. r .9 1 1 �� .9 9 1,9 �: . % �:� r r r r 9 9 �,:. �: %9. . 9 r %:� :: r 9 r 9;. � : %.� � I �,� I �9 - ___�, + � -i? ,,_ ,I ,D r� 9 � r r �� � r r r .. 9 1 . r r r. 9 9 � �:r � r I r r � r r�1 9 1 9 9, 1 9 9 9 r r I.I I ., I : I, I I %-I ,, . .. r r r. r r �r :r r . 9 9 1 .I %:.I�9 1 .9..I .I I :., �.. �:., �. . .. 9 1 1 �:, ----- ,,1 I r,� 9 r:. r 9. ..� .. �. 9 1 9 � I I� :. r .r. r �� r%. .I 1 9 �� � 'r.r :r �.�, � 1 91 1 . 9 9 � . ,, %. % . -r r �r r r-.r .:r r . �9 9 .9 1 9 1 1 .I I: 9 , , .: �:: %. %. %9 . r r 9 9 9 1 �:. I I I I .. � - r- _Awiiii�I i ; _ 1 9 , r. r r rr r 9 r � I 1 9. r r r I , 1 9 9 9 9 .9 , I. .I r� .�� .-r �.. r 1 9 9 1 , . .:. �.I . r 9 1 1 . 9 � � � � I � �. 9 r � 9 9 ���I :r .1 9 Prope fty L i n e r. r r r r r , . 9.r % 9 � r � 9 9 99 i 9 %, : I I, %: ��:. %. ..,. %I r,, r 9 � � .1 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 1, ��9 9 9 9. .I �� ��I�:��: I:I� I,., ,:. �� 9 9 9 9,r � ,�� � I __,-_.--- � ,,, . r � - . ��� r �, � r � r r r r.r I I I .. : I . I 1 9 r 9 1 1 1, .,I �:, .�.I I%:. .:. .:. : . 9 9 9 9 ,. 9: : I I �r I I � ..I I .. �.9 9 .. 9 r r 1 9 � *� I '....... '�...1.�.'r r r rr I r rr9rr.r,rrrrrr'1jr'r'1'r'r: r � . � �� : I . r 9 .I r r r I . r 9 9 9 9 .. � .: � 9 9 9, 9 .. 9 9 9 9 9 1 1 .9 9 9 r r I . . I�r :r r r r r .. 9 � ..,9 . 9 r 1 9 1 r r r 9 � �� 9 1, I -'- I.- � � 9 9 9 9 . �, ��� r 1 9 9 9 9, 9 9 9 9 9 9�9 1 r.,: ,9 �9 r r.. � �� 9 9 9 9 9, 1 9 9 9 r. 9 9 9 99 � , . r r .I �. I I, . 9 1 r r. �. 9.9 r � 'r I , 9 9 .r 9 9 �r. 9 � 99 9 1 .�. I r ��, . � �� � .I :. r � r r . r 9 r �� �: I I 1 9 r� 9 9 r � ,9 .9 9.. 9 9 9. 9.9 9 9 9 r I � I . 9 r 91 r 9 9. I r r . r..1 9 ,:�:�: : r: ,r r. 9 � ,�,, ,,,��", I r �9 r r r r ,� 1 9 9 9 9 1, �, .: .,. ... .9 9 1 r. r 9 .9 . r r 9 9 ,� I .9 1 1 . 1 9. . .r r r . �. r , r . 9 r 9 1 , 'I" I I �r 9 9 1, r � r 11 1 9 r,r r �: :. r r :� �. I �� � � .. r :r r � � .r r r r I . r r r 9 r. 9 9 9. 9 �I I� �. 9 9 . , � - � � 9 r, � P rope rty Li n e I ,, , 9 r 9 9 � � 9 1 . � -r ,,r . r � . � .r . �. . r r � 9 9. 9 1 r �I I I . r I r . 9 9 9 9. . I 11,�'11,,�� 0 . � � ,�� 9 9 ,� � r : % . r. .. �, . ... . %r. .� r.. .I %,. �.I r r, 9 �. r:r r r r:' � r r � �: 9 9 9 � :� :� :�, 9 9 1 1, . ::, '- � r r : . r I . ��,, .I, � 11 0 I 1 9. r � 9 9 1 -:. :9 r � r r. ��. ��, I�.� I r � �I ,... I r r. .r r. -r .��, I� r r r � � 1 9 9 . I I I r � r� r � �. . 9 . r - r 9 1�1,i , , 9 , � �� � I I. ... �I %: 9 9 ...I r r r : ,:. �-.r r r � b r r �.� r r.. %::.I%::r r:r r: �� .: .. r 9 .2, ��. ....:.r.rr: �� � :r :,r . 9 9 1 .99: I � ., �. � � r 9 9 9 9 99 1 . I .� .�. �� �. r, .� r�. r . � :r . 9 ,9 r. . � � .� .. :� r �,I : � I - . I� 9. I. � � 9 1 1 1, 9 . 9�9 9�. � 9. -r .I .... .. rr r .�. r �: :. � . . r. . �. , r � .. r : 9 � r. 9 1 1 1 1 1 . I� ��� . �. r 9 r 9 1 1 1 -: % �� .� r. .r.9 .r %,� � � : 'r �I. . .1. , r �9 r 9 9 , , , .9 1 ., r r � I,. I, 9 9 � �� %�. .,. r.r I.r. .r r r � % r r �,� ., r, r . �� � . I� r� �:. r .9.I . r 9 9. 9 9. 9 9 9 r I r �r � � r r r r �� . 9 9 , � �.� � : .r: . '... r. . %::, r :� ��.. r r. . . . � ____j.......-,-�--_,__."---�� , r.� r . I . 9 �. . r 9 1 1 9 q r r r 2: I:, 9 : : I -r .I r.. ..:. r r r r r r. �,r. -r r r. r: ,r �:�.� :.�.-r r r 9 9 'r I r :�:r r 9. . r ��r � 9 1 9 1 .I �, :� : . I : 9 9:r , I � � 9 1 1 ., �� I ..I I I ,: . 9 .I 1 9�9. r r r r I I �:: .r . %r � 9 ��. I r. I. I r 9 1 � . . r r r, ' : . : r .r.r ��� �. . : ,,r :: r . � 9 .9 1 % %.� %:. ... r.� r rr 9 . r � �:� r 9 �9 9 ��:r .. � ' r ., . r %:. . . .9:. .. r...�.... r 9 ..: r'. r.r r "I r r : 9 1. r . r 9 9 r r 9::: �r I. I r.. 9 r r . ... :r : �:r : r �: r.. 9 �9 .I . . .. r. I r rr r r � . . r I: � 9 9�9 9 9 1 �I� .:�' '�, �. rr .I:� 9 9 r . , . %:. r : :� �9 1 1 .:9 ' �: % i 11\ 'r r � I. I � � . I� r :'r r 9 . . �, %� ,,r r 9 9 9.r . � 9 � r . 9 9 9 r �9 r. � � �. �.. r r : � �� I, .. .,. r 9 9 �: 9 �r.r. 'r. .r. N '*:::f : r r ' � r r I,I 9..r... 1.. �:.. I, .r ��. �r r r. ... .�. r r :�.r., %r., r � 1 9 9 .. . I r r r�,.� , �.rr I r rr I I :9 : �:I I.9 9 9 r.9,9 r : �. 9. 9.9, 9.. 9 9 9 r :I .:.. I:. . ��I :.,.r.. ... r� r.. .r I r ., 9 1,:. 9 r�9 r.9 1, r r.. . r �. . r r r r r., .. .r r Ir r 9 1 . �. I r r:.I.��r �.� ..1.I..'� -r I %:r. �- i 6:�,\ 1�� \1 � r 9 r r I % I . �, � 9 r 9: .I r. �, . . � .. . : 9 9 . r ,�::� . . 1 9 �, � 9 9� �. . r, .9 . r . r r r I :. . ,9 9, 9 9 9 '9 9 9 .� r . . � 9 I %.. .9. \1 9 9 . %:r 9 , �:. r %�' r. .: r %:. � �� � r �.. �9 r :r :.r �. .. .: 9 1 9 1, 9 9 . �r 9 9 9. 1 9 9 r. 9 1 : �� .. � ... 9.r r r r � I ., 9. . r . -:. 9 � r . ��� 99 %:: 9 1 r. 9:r r �r�, %; %�� " r r �I. . 9 1� . .9 9 :., :� 9:9 r r � r r � :. .1.:.% 9. r 9 1 1 9 9 �: 2 : �:%:r: r . . I .9 9 1 9 .9,I r 9. . 1 9: 9 1 � 9 �� . . r��r.�::�r r � � .. :. . . 9 9. r �9 i I � r r ., . 1 9 9 r r r I I �: . -: %%I �%. I%. 1 9 . 9 �.. �,: I 1 9�� �, �, I r ..1 9: . � . I. I .. . 9 : . ,., %r, ..: .. 9 , 9 r � � I r r . 9 . �9 . � I � I I r r � %r. : :,� . r, r . I I . 9 , .. r,� 9 . . . . 9 ..� . I r r � � .: . I � 9 9. : . I :9�, 9, � ��,, �%� ,.%r r I .I .., :::I � 11��) �r � � 9 . I., :.r: 9 9 : : . 9. 9 r I r ' r . . I :r . . I � r I I . .:I I r:� I .. 9 : I:, 9 :r r .. .. ' %�, �' . 9 . �I � ��, r. r r 9 . � . r 9 . � I r r 9 9 9 1 1 1 r r . r 9 1 .,.� �,.� ., I : r, ' : :r r I r 9 9 �I .. , .. I � �, 9. �� � 9.r. 9 . r � 9 9 .1 9 9 . . r �. �.. 9 1 � I. . r r. r r� . r . 9 9 .9 .� 9 1 9 1 9 9 1 9 9 1 .9 9 1 � r I.,r :� �� r: r: . r:: r. r 9 ,9 9 9 9 1 9 1: �;. %. :, 9:. r. 9. .r 9 �.9 r �:.I . I I . � 9 9 1. 9. 9�. r .� r. I� r 9 . � 1 9 1 9 9 9 9 9 1� . 9, 9 r I I . � 9 1. .,�� .:I I:,� . 1 9 . .9 9 9:9 ..9 ,9�r .:. . � I -%= � 9 �, � r r r � ,9 9 9 � �I .: � . �,. . . I r r r r r,r r � �,. �:. . 9 � 9. %;. r . r r 9 9, �: 9 1 1, ,,=_====-- ., 9 � I, . r r r r r . I I . 9 9 9 9 9 .rr r r r � �, I� �. . , :r r r .,29'-1 3/8" 9 . �� �. r . :r 9 1== � 9 9 �. I r 9.9 � �� � 9� �I ��.� :-r r 9 r 9 ------- . r r 9. r r I I . : �: .. 9 .r 9. r r r r r � � � 9 r :.� � - : : . 9 9 9 9 r :, � .. I .. r I . . 9 .9 9 r I. 9. 9 1 1 1 1: �,I :. � :9 �9 . .� r . �� � 9:, 9.. �9. :9 . . r... 9 1 r � . I .� :. .: 9 1 1.9. . . � � r/r� -r.' r. . r. r I I .. .,. .9 � 9. . r r 9 1 ., -- / . ..I -r. r r r r I . I -:,. ..9 .. 9 �� .�::: r.r �: . . 9 9 9. 9 9 �I�,9 . . . - , I�:, .9.%:�o/ - I I ------- -- I LO I :J� . i I I��: _<� � P., � 1171111 I 11) I � - C D __ Uj �_, --) :�� 1 9 .� _ ,,, �- �-_ _j ��7_ (_) = __",_1111"" ------------- I- �� `- =) (D " " - 1 9- r-r, 'r-Ir-- I I I -_CD r_-r_- r.-r,_,.9 ,-I__,I-I I U) I�I (D �) _�6 1�I�,, I � I'll ,�� (_/ � 9 9-,9-, _� = -'�r r----r-,-1.r-.,,,_ ' -' r, 7D (D --C- I-11_1 11 I "I-I 1 9 1 1 -I r 1 9 1 1 1 1�� I L/� �_-) � ,-,I,1-1-1 9 1 9 --_,_, I 11111�, ___j r-)- ��2 ,,er ��, (D cD 175 - eo, At"" I �� �_ (/') ", � � I 1%�11 �,.,, __, .- � _�� 'i ___-, __,_"r,, "I I ( I - = �� �_,_�_ 411N, - cD K� U') '\ ____ _= �_. Q-) � _�___-, -CD �= co 20` 1 ,C) f 2 STORY co '___________......... _CD w_ CD \ _r 1_�� F= = � I I-, LD �D r--) 0 \ 1_� M C-) _�� \ I-) -6 12? = .- CM ,) C_ � M Ir- ,_- �,�",11,1.1--,,_,_,___._99-9-9 9"-, - M I :�_ C_ - � I�� "�I, w �, - BRICK BUILDING Ir- � + L :�, - 113- I ,/Ill =D � = W /,,,r, � 0) T_ I ill""' �/, 1� CD Co - z ______---rr,_I- - 111-), = '1�5 C_�_ M qZ1 (D 1 "I- I " ,-"-,-_,_,__,_,_,-'-"""""r �:D - .� I,,� 9 "r _.�r__ rTD �D_ 7F T_ " ., '�r �D - >.I 0) I 11 1.�I r r I I 9r,Ir, I"�I "r cc -�-) 15 - M M r 11 I r I I 1 9 -.,___, �, ",, ,,�,,"I 1 9, I�I I,I � 11`1r �- _LD CD = I 11 I , � , � M M " I 11 / ' -� _�-----_----,L:-_, "__ = = .C) 99�._ __.__...9._.r. I ,_ (D _�� a- 1� _,,__r r"r�Ir", "' � .- (1) 3: L_ (n ,I I-, .9.,,�',9 9�- I, I I, I I I- ,I -�� C� - ",r 9 9 E -�2 -�' 4- a) M ,;I- _ �, -, �71 I - _C3 ,= 0 -0 CIO __ CD� C-) - .- >-I M I .= .= - . *- _j M I M 3i �_D ( U-) ,� CD- 2 -:E I = = (711 C_ �'11" KEY . . Q-) I kn M �E ` - .- 3: " 11 4__ (1) \ +- 101� 70 0 -0 \",\,. - REDI - Relocated Existing Drainage Inlet 0 -. I I rl� Q) -�- _j 11 I - ,�_' = I I , - � I -0 _C EDI - Existing Drainage Inlet L_ CY) C: U - . - DI - Drainage Inlet (1) W -a + LP - Leaching Pool w/ Drainage Inlet (3) (1) Q -0 + HIP - High Point L_ 0 Bollard Light PERMIT SET (n Post Light (1) Q Wall Light Masonry Light Title: D Existing Spot/Door L,ight -a Existing Post Light Easement Detail Plan ' - @ Electric Outlet Scale: MCKEWMID Hose Bib 31/16 1 1 :____ 11 �0 1 1 " - - - �� 0 ___�, Existing Trees �� F 0 - - 0 0 - - 0 - 1� __� � �� I � , "' , "I"' 4 11 I 11 11 "I ___�� 111" I � I I , I - ____ I ,-,,�,,�, T "___���� , , I"',\- , , ,�,""', -,� " ) __:_�' \ L______ � ,'_' '------ rl--- , , , , � ill F_wi'l_In_� 1� "� , , , �, I -11 11 � , � _1�1!w "" , , -, ,� � - � ", �, . , 11 "" *7,iu�,, fi I ,�, M!, ' � I Z I I � 21 Is � I ) \ C__j ". "I' 1 �,, �`��' ' , ,�, 11 . , - _ I I �, I � Z � � " - _ _ I F;l \ SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD---..a (: ) Drafted by: ---Et- 4' Privacy Fence Filc Martz L1 Nte: 06 08 26 0 e Wood Post and Rope Gate Supplemental I I Sheet I Svb� I SOUTHOLD ;OU7h{OLfJ TOWN June 8,2026 Dear James Rich,Chair of Southold Town Planning Board: I am writing in support of the Southold Free Library's proposal to renovate the outside yard (also known as the "Pocket Park"). As the children's librarian here at the Southold Free Library, I can attest to the great importance of having a beautiful outdoor space for the children and families of our community to enjoy. Being outside enhances library programming with both physical outdoor toy play and sensory play, hearing the birds,feeling the grass on their feet, and the sun on their little faces. During the summer, I have outdoor storytimes with the little ones and it helps to facilitate enjoyable messy activities,such as STEAM projects, sensory bins, and gardening type of projects that are definitely easier to clean in an outdoor setting and makes more sense to do outside. The renovation will provide an even more inviting space to do lots of other activities outside. The plan will provide water access for outdoor water play,electric outlets and arena type seating to help have outdoor concerts that patrons of all ages can enjoy in the beauty of a green space,and the paths leading from the parking lot will be a wonderful experience in itself with a story walk,outdoor"reading garden" space, and mushroom shaped checker/chess boards to stumble upon and play on along the path. These little nooks and spaces foster physical activity and literacy development. It also goes to say that a natural,quiet environment helps reduce stress and promotes a state of well- being. An open outdoor library yard will allow kids a space to both decompress and run around while socializing together after sitting all day in school. This encourages unstructured play after a full day of learning where kids can just be kids and gives our local families another beautiful reason to visit their local library. For these reasons, among many others, I hope you strongly consider all of the benefits of the Southold Library moving forward with their plans to renovate our Pocket Park to benefit the Southold Town community of all ages to enjoy. Thank you! Sincerely, Dana Bruey Children's Services Southold Free Library 53705 Main Road • PO Box 697 • Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-2077 + southoldlibrary.org 7,77 From: Nancy Stellato <nancymstellato@gmail.com> P 3 14L C Sent: Monday,June 8,2026 8:38 PM r� � R To: Lanza,Heather;Michaelis,Jessica R Subject: Southold Free Library Pocket Park JN 0 SOUTHOLD TOWN Dear Planning Board Members, PLNtw" This letter is in support of the proposed Pocket Park in honor of Maureen Osterman, a beloved member of the Southold community and generous benefactor of the Southold Free Library. This planned space will serve both residents and visitors, enhance the downtown area and certainly improve the existing space. Shaded areas, native vegetation, and gathering space for library and other programs will be most welcome along Main Rd.The additional parking spaces factored into this plan are a well planned use of this space. I am in favor of this lovely enhancement to our community and kindly ask that you move forward with approval. Thankyou. Nancy Stellato Resident of Southold ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. i S v L ac M b-F- Al P c. June 4,2026 Aa James H. Rich III, Chair II' 0W ERD Members of the Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN �C, ��NIN DNo Dear Chairman Rich, I am writing on behalf of the Southold Free Library Board of Trustees to thank the Planning Board for scheduling the public hearing on the amended site plan for the proposed merger of our two adjacent lots(SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2&15.5)and the construction of a pocket park to be located on the Library's property at 53745 NYS Route 25 and 690 Traveler Street,Southold. We are very excited about creating a pocket park on the Library building's adjoining property. As Caroline MacArthur,the Library Director,stated in the opening presentation at the Public Hearing on Monday evening,June 1,2026,this project will provide not only space for Library programs but also additional green space for all of our residents and for visitors to the bustling Southold business district.We were very fortunate to have received the generous contribution from Maureen Ostermann's estate that will make this project possible. We know she would be very proud of this new space. Also,we want to acknowledge our surprise at the sudden change in support announced by our neighboring property owners at the hearing.Although we have been in the park planning stages for the last four years and have been in regular, informal,communication with our neighbors,we were not made aware of any concerns until a few hours prior to the public hearing. Rather,they were very supportive of the plan,which basically has remained unchanged since they attended the roll-out presentation in February 2025 at the Library.Our monthly Board meetings are open to the public and are noted in our newsletter and on our webpage. We look forward to moving ahead with the plan as presented, but if you have any questions or would like any additional information before the July 13th meeting, please let us know. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sinc' ,rely, t C�� cz&�,J/ Lisa Davi off, President,Southold Free Library Board of Trustees Caroline MacArthur,Library Director,Southold Free Library 53705 Main Road • PO Box 697 • Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-2077 • southold library.org From: Nicholas Planamento <Nicholas.Planamento@raveis.com> (� Sent: Wednesday,June 3,2026 1:11 PM :S bT' To: Cummings, Brian A_ Cc: Michaelis,Jessica;Nicholas Planamento;Michaelis,Jessica;Joan Bischoff van Heemskerck F N' I J J P g Library u1 ' Subject: Follow-Up to June 1 Public Hearin Southold Free Libra SCTM: 1000-61-1-15.2 and 15.5 �1 � Attachments: 1000-61.-1-16 Approved Waiver of Site plan for redevelopment incl apartment 9 parking spaces , I' SOUTHOLD TOV N PLAN%NGBOA O Brian, Please share this correspondence with the Planning Board and staff, and include it in the application file (record)for the Southold Free Library's proposal to merge two lots and create a pocket park with associated site improvements including new parking, accessible pathways, a stone amphitheater, seating, etc etc. First, please extend my appreciation to the Planning Board for leaving the June 1 public hearing open.This will allow me, on behalf of Jewell on Main, LLC, the immediately adjacent property owner to the east, an opportunity to work directly with the applicant to address concerns regarding the project. Prior to receiving notice of the hearing last Thursday, my most recent communication with the library regarding this proposal was on February 12, 2025.At that time in response to their presentation, I requested a plan that would preserve reasonable access to the parking lot located behind our building. Given the positive relationship between neighboring property owners and the library, I was surprised that no updates were provided despite inquiries regarding the project's status, until receipt of the USPS Certified Mail,which,when received last Thursday, did not allow time to again discuss the proposal with the library(although, we did attempt a hurried meeting on Monday morning). Other than widening the access point from Main Road to a gate (which I believe based on my conversation with the applicant, may be for the library's benefit to allow a truck to back in/out to the site to load/offload tents/tables/chairs for special events), I am unaware of any modification that recognizes the longstanding use of this (my) parking area, historically tied to adjacent parking areas on the site which served a variety of buildings and uses, some simultaneously: a post office, a residence, a garage, a bakery, a deli, a restaurant, and most recently, solely the library and library staff along with the public who regularly park there while shopping on Main Road. Our mixed use building was constructed in the mid-19th Century(and presumably, originally part of the subject library parcel), long before the adoption of zoning, and has served to 'define'the community's character and cannot be easily pigeon-holed to conform to modern standards - after all our community is among the oldest in North America,founded in 1640, and should be viewed differently,with an understanding of historic uses, access and quiet enjoyment. While I would like to support this project, I cannot do so in its current form. My concerns are supported by Planning Board records relating to my property at 53795 and 53801 Main Road, Southold (SCTM No. 1000-61-6- 16).Attached is the parking plan on file with the Planning Board, bearing its date stamp.This is the document I referenced during my comments at Monday's hearing. Before providing further comment, I intend to contact Caroline MacArthur, Director of the Southold Free Library, to arrange a meeting and work toward a mutually acceptable resolution. My goal is to enthusiastically support this project while preserving reasonable access and parking rights associated with 53795 Main Road and to avoid any future issue with my property as it may relate to the Planning Board or any town agency, for a current or future mixed-use. i Thank you, and please extend my thanks to the Planning Board, for their assistance and consideration. After meeting with Ms. MacArthur, I will provide an update regarding the outcome of our discussions. Please keep me advised of any future meeting dates and times concerning this application. Best regards, Nick Nicholas J. Planamento Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker William Raveis Real Estate 6920 Main Road, Mattituck, NY 11952 Cell: 631-948-0143 Email: Nicholas.Planamento@Raveis.com Web: NicholasPlanamento.Raveis.com Personal Web: htt s: lnicholasr)lanamento.com VN I, NTE- WIN TOP U l RY BROK Asp Us About E_lte C ei-ge ervic- REA- EA ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 2 �uur�c;rov�a t PL4re4itiC c�tRu Karst— ! i l4 1 3 A � w , t s 7q f w r t}±%` I d O � is 14 t s MAP OF PROPEWrY _ SVRVEYEO FOR Q , LEFFER"iS PAINE ED5oni AT SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK CO., N.Y. 3 Z � I u t W t-s+or x c Cross cu+ in caner.WaIK i G � cone. 41d9. ` 3 a r . 6aare n+aed to Koine Tine ilivisian Chi"10 Title [rssaraaacs Ce+njwwy V .od oufdold 34vinis Ea" M Etlfveged R1ari[ a, 1466 VAri T'UYt, i S*W t+ britK tiidc�. ��-� � Liesa>ied inerd + f F 4reeft�crt, N.Y. t fi D v - '4.4; k..5 Mows tYA R mow , MAILING ADDRESS: OFFICE LOCATION: � �' Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov " era J PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 2, 2026 Mr. Eric Martz P.O. Box 894 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re Public Hearing Southold Free Library Parking Site Plan 53705 & 53745 Main Road, Southold SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Dear Mr. Martz: A Public Hearing was held by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 1, 2026 regarding the above-referenced application. The Public Hearing was held open until July 13, 2026. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Respectfully, )ct—-- H. I James H. Rich III Chairman M B " P \\ 024 Joan@jbischofflaw.com law.com iS aw -0234 PLLC JUN 0 Z ZO26 o6 SOUTHOLD TOWN 7160 Hortons Lane ATTORNEY AT LAW PLANNING BOARD Southold, NY 11971 3U6VnLkk_A a-A KLC.P_" Southold, June 1, 2026 Southold Town Planning Board Planning Department, Town Hall Annex 54375 NYS Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Southold Free Library Amended Site Plan Application (Pocket Park) Request for Deferral Pending Further Review of Circulation, Access, Maneuvering, and Adjoining Property Impacts Chairperson and Members of the Planning Board: I write on behalf of Jewell on Main,, LLC, owner of 53795 Main Road, the property immediately adjoining the Southold Free Library. At the outset, I wish to make clear that we are not opposed to the Library, nor are we opposed to the concept of a pocket park or public garden. To the contrary, we recognize that many residents may view the proposal as a welcome beautification project for this portion of downtown Southold, and we appreciate the Library's desire to improve its property and create an attractive public amenity. Our concern is not with the concept of the project itself. Rather, our concern is that the proposed location of the garden appears to occupy an area that has historically served important circulation, access, and vehicle maneuvering functions associated with the longstanding parking field serving 53795 Main Road. We believe these concerns can be addressed without defeating the overall objectives of the project. However, before permanent improvements are approved and installed, we respectfully submit that the Board should require additional review of the circulation,, access, maneuvering, and adjoining-property impacts associated with the proposal. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Board defer action on the application and require the applicant to supplement the record with the information identified below. BACKGROUND This is not a new issue. On or about February 12, 2025, representatives of the Library invited us to review a revised version of the proposed project. During that meeting, we specifically raised concerns regarding the impact of the proposal on parking access, circulation, and vehicle maneuvering associated with the parking field serving 53795 Main Road. Those same concerns were raised again during a meeting with representatives of the Library Zn earlier today in an effort to resolve the matter before this hearing. Unfortunately, despite discussions spanning more than a year,the concerns previously identified do not appear to have been addressed or accommodated in the plans currently before the Board. We also note that although the certified notice of application was mailed on May 19, actual receipt did not occur until May 29, leaving limited time to review the application materials, historical plans, surveys, circulation impacts, and title documents before tonight's hearing. LONGSTANDING CONDITIONS For more than forty years, the owners and occupants of 53795 Main Road and the owners and occupants of the adjoining parcel have coexisted with a longstanding and well-established pattern of parking, access, circulation, and vehicle maneuvering along the common boundary between the properties. The parking field serving 53795 Main Road has functioned for decades in reliance upon established circulation patterns, rights-of-way, and maneuvering areas located along and adjacent to that boundary. These circulation patterns did not arise recently. They existed before the Library acquired the adjoining parcel and have continued throughout the Library's ownership. The Library therefore acquired and maintained its property with full knowledge of the existing parking configuration, circulation patterns, and historical use of the area. Indeed, the existing circulation environment has historically benefited not only the owners and occupants of 53795 Main Road, but also Library patrons, visitors, neighboring businesses, customers, tenants, and members of the public utilizing this portion of downtown Southold. The parking and circulation environment surrounding these properties has functioned as part of the practical parking network serving the Main Road business district for decades. ROUTE 25 ACCESS AND SAFETY CONCERNS The circulation issues presented by this application must be evaluated in the context of the property's direct connection to Main Road(Route 25). Vehicles accessing the parking field do not maneuver within an isolated parking lot. Rather, they enter and exit through a constrained circulation corridor connecting directly to Main Road, one of the busiest and most heavily traveled roadways in the Town and the principal commercial corridor of downtown Southold. Because ingress and egress occur directly onto Route 25, adequate on-site circulation and maneuvering space are essential to safe operation. 2 The proposed garden appears to occupy portions of the area historically used for vehicle circulation and maneuvering associated with the parking field serving 53795 Main Road. As a result,the proposal raises legitimate questions concerning vehicle movements, turning maneuvers, circulation patterns, and the practical functionality of the parking field that have not been adequately addressed in the current record. THE LIBRARY'S PRIOR PLANNING SUBMISSIONS We are particularly concerned because the current proposal appears inconsistent with prior planning materials submitted by the applicant. In connection with the 2013 lot-line modification approved by the Planning Board,plans depicted a proposed access route to a lower level in approximately the same area now proposed for the pocket park. While prior plans do not dictate future site design, they demonstrate that this area was previously recognized by the applicant as serving an important access, circulation, and parking-related ction. The current application does not appear to explain how the circulation and maneuvering functions previously identified in that location will be preserved, replaced, or accommodated. RIGHTS-OF-WAY,ACCESS,AND MANEUVERING AREAS The record reflects the existence of rights-of-way affecting the area in question. Historical surveys, title materials, and longstanding site conditions further demonstrate that areas adjacent to those rights-of-way have historically been utilized for vehicle circulation and maneuvering associated with the parking field serving 53795 Main Road. The attached exhibits illustrate the relationship between the proposed garden, the existing rights- of-way, and the circulation patterns that have historically served the parking field. We recognize that the Planning Board is not being asked to adjudicate private property rights. However, the Board is being asked to approve permanent physical improvements in an area where substantial questions remain concerning access, circulation, maneuvering, and the practical use of existing parking facilities. The existence of recorded rights-of-way, longstanding historical use, and unresolved questions concerning access and circulation rights further support the need for caution before permanent improvements are approved in this location. INFORMATION MISSING FROM THE RECORD 3 Based upon our review, the current record does not appear to contain sufficient information to evaluate the circulation, maneuvering, and adjoining-property impacts of the proposal. At a minimum, we respectfully request: 1. A circulation analysis addressing existing circulation patterns and the impact of the proposed garden on vehicle movement, and proposed access to the park 2. Vehicle-turning templates demonstrating how vehicles may safely maneuver within the circulation system serving the site following construction of the proposed improvements. 3. A comparison between the circulation concepts reflected in the 2013 lot-line modification materials and the current proposal. 4. A survey overlay depicting the proposed garden footprint in relation to property boundaries, rights-of-way, circulation paths, and maneuvering areas. 5. An evaluation of whether the -pro-posed improvements will impair existing circulation patterns or materially reduce the practical ability to access and utilize the parking field serving 53795 Main Road. REQUESTED ACTION We are asking the Board to reject this project as resented and require the applicant to submit a 1J p revised application ensuring access to existing parking field at 53795 Main Road. We respectfully submit that the concerns identified above do not require abandonment of the project. Rather, they warrant additional review and, if necessary, reasonable modifications to the site plan so that the Library's objectives can be achieved without unnecessarily impairing longstanding circulation and access serving neighboring properties. Approving permanent physical improvements before these issues are fully evaluated risks creating an avoidable conflict affecting circulation, access, maneuvering, and the practical operation of adjoining properties. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Board defer action on the application and require the applicant to supplement the record with the information identified above before any final determination is made. Thank you for your considera * .n Jer Respectfully submitted, HE R CCKK ....................... I EE--JOAN BISCHOFF VAN Attorney for Jewell on Main, LLC Owner of 53795 Main Road 4 vnhhwb�� MEM 7,L�/ JUN 0 1 2026 Southold Town Planning Board Letter SOUTHOLD I OWN C)i PLANNING BOARD 2245 MCR LLC / FEATHER HILL VILLAGE 53345 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Featherhillvillage@gmail.com 631-780-285I May 31, 2026 Southold Town Planning Board c/o Jessica M. Southold Town Hall Annex 54375 NYS Route 25, 2nd Floor Southold, NY 11971 Email:jessicaM@southoldtownny.gov Re: Opposition to Amended Site Plan for Southold Free Library Pocket Park- SCTM# 1000-61--1-15.2 & 15.5 Public Hearing: June 1, 2026 Dear Members of the Southold Town Planning Board, We are writing on our behalf as the owners of the commercial Shopping Center immediately adjacent to the Southold Free Library property. We have serious and ongoing concerns regarding the proposed merger of lots SCTM# 1000-61.4-15.2 & 15.5 and the construction of the new pocket park, including new parking, pathways, amphitheater, seating areas, and related improvements. For many years, the Southold Free Library has had insufficient on-site parking.As a direct result,library patrons routinely and illegally park in our private Shopping Center parking lot. This occurs on a daily basis and creates significant hardship for our tenants and customers. Our tenants regularly complain about: • Loss of parking spaces needed for their own customers and employees in our busy commercial center. • Garbage and litter left beside vehicles parked in our lots. • Illegal dumping of trash into our dumpsters. These issues recently escalated to the point where the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office— one of our tenants — complained about illegal garbage dumping, which even led to a dumpster fire. We have previously raised the illegal parking issue directly with the library and received no response.The current proposal, which adds a multi-purpose community space with a stone amphitheater, shaded activity areas, and other gathering features,will only increase demand for parking. The library's existing spaces are already grossly inadequate.Adding more visitors and programming without substantially increasing dedicated parking will inevitably worsen the spill over into our private property. We strongly urge the Planning Board to require the library to provide significantly more on-site parking as a condition of approving this amended site plan.The current plan does not adequately address the well-documented parking deficiency,and approving it without major changes would unfairly burden neighboring commercial properties. We respectfully request that the Planning Board consider these impacts during the June 1, 2026, public hearing and condition any approval on a comprehensive parking solution that keeps library-related parking on library property.We are available to discuss this matter and provide additional documentation of the ongoing issues if helpful. Thank you for your attention to this important community matter. We support the library and improvements to downtown Southold,but not at the repeated expense of adjacent private property owners. Sincerely, Marcello, Ralph, and Alex Pica 2245 MCR LLC, Feather Hill Village 631-780-2851 Featherhillvillage@gmail.com L y P i3j HL i (, # M-,'Fg FjM E 0 submission Without a Cover Letter MAY 2 9 7026 SOUTHOLD TOWN PL W-41N G BOARD Dame: f'i (�iMar+ 'z--„ Sov4j-\0jdr 'ectTitle� L �bf�r" F�!�'' �.►P a �"�:-�� lJ k S CTM#: 1000 - — -- a i Date: Details of Submission: C1 A V 0-7cPOS+I rn COMPLETE THIS SECT• •MPLETE THIS SECTION ON * Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X -'� ❑Agent so that we can return the card to you. 0 Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B ecelve ty Tinted lva *) D. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits, 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Ws If YES,enter delivery address telow: 0 No A)+^ P J+i_ �/ 0 �11 1 1 � 3. Service Type 11 Priority Mail Express(g) ❑Adult Signature 0 Registered MailTM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery 13 Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified WHO Delivery 9590 9402 9373 5002 6244 87 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery 0 Signature ConfirmationTM F1 Collect on Delivery 0 Signature Confirmation '� ++r►+f•d Ah�'nhcr frrancfPr rrorn service label) CJ Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery 9589 0710 52?0 1899 3004 26 1redMail �red Mail Restricted Delivery _ 's PS Form 3$1'i,July 2020 PSN 7530-02.000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt { r COMPLETE ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. aE�E: ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X i7 Agent so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to:�A D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑Yes SewCll o^ /ul n U L If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No 71lci F 4—,s Lh. S61-ft"Wi lvq 1011 II I IIIIII IIII III I III II III III I II IIIII I(IIIII III 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express8 ❑Adult Signature [3 Registered Mail"A ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certlfled Mail® Delivery 9590 9402 9373 5002 6245 17 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation7m ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery ,ci Mail 9589 0 710 5270 1899 3005 44 $00,11 Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic^Refurn Receipt COMPLETE •N COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Si ature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse Agent so that we can return the card to you. _ Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. a ived by(Printed Name) C. a of D live or on the front if space permits. & -h c rt i`:;I X, '7 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item it ❑ s Waj+er Sto cltck; If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No 1,% Tr¢J well 1,4 . g-r6,f, 'hi Y II I IIIIII IIII III I III II II I III I II IIII III III II III 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MailrM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mail® Delivery 9590 9402 9373 5002 6249 99 El Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation*^+ ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 9. Artirle Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery 'Mail 9589 0 710 5270 1899 3004 69 Me�il Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt Postal r Service TPA E'P CERTIFIED ■ ! CERTIFIED j O RECEIPTDomestic Mail Only" Domestic O *. # - Ln p - � L7 For delivery 1 77 Certified It aJI Fee Er - Er Certified Mail FGe _ _. rp t:0 Extra rwlGes&Fet?s( tick Ivy,add fee as _.. 4. r� Return Receipt(hardcoPY) $ t=-- .. Ir Ex"Se s+$Fs [Rack box, fr p�r�o�orr,Qra t A 17-1 ❑Retum Receipt(hardcoPY) $ Q Return Receipt(electronic) $ Postmark � ❑Retum Receipt(electronic) $ P4StR18ifC t ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ Y r Here 0 Certtfled Mail Restricted Delivery $ ��+r Hare []Adult Signature Required $ _ a 1_1'.11 ❑Adult Signature Required $ `� � ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ru a�� �0 � Ri ❑ °'- !t'i��I �� !tit Adult Signature Restricted 1 4lvery m R'�5't��6 1Vl 1 L,!'� - - _ ^ Postage Tota I Postage and w _• ` Totals postage and Fees Seat TO t- O Ir -F r w �'l�r�_D sent To -a � ------a_s-#r let arr .` oa, x �" ..+a_� �C '. ._ '..__.. n .._.. _--a.-._-+_-_a.. � .ta-'? IF,6;-40� � t A v � CO tR'-s-arra Apt.N16 or Dox o. Er" ----_-__--------.------♦tyt..�._.. �v- c }�? IPA I , .. r Q [I .._....._.a-. ._.,._..._ PS Form :,, JanuaU 2Q23 See-Rouerse for, • . :11 1 _ Reverse for Instructions TM.S. ■ ! Service ■ ! stal Service CERTIFIED MAIL®R RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL-�- RECEIPT rri )� Domestic Ln Ln ❑ _ - . .� o ourwebsite at wwwusps,com .6 o m Er OerIffled Mall F .-ter.-- _ Er Owtii;ied Mall Fee _.�• Ir��:r) Er S Er Ens tra Services eas fc�IVOf box,add� ��.�r4� E+�t ra S t i es Fees{rhx.t .,a a � �► r-� Q Return Receipt(hard copy) $ r-q ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ Q Q Return Receipt(electronic) $ - Q Return Receipt(electronic) $ -).EI Postmark, PeS,rr3ari4 Certtfled Mall Restricted Delivery $ E Q Certified Mall Restricted very ted Deli � 1!�sa~e (} ❑Adult Signature Retiulred $_ ^��� ❑Adult Signature Required $ __ 9 2a2tre Lr) Q Adult Signature Restricted Delivery a Lr) ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ MNY �yV1.�D BtCld 'S.►V i i�:' ?1T�:'.I. ,1 •!f+~! T to i P ge _�_�. _- J: '"� Tb#a€Postage and Fees ` ' . r-�-+ flit To �_ tw le r S-srit'To , co -rind AT- 4 � Apt. a, � h -- �• +��_ ;-w.�_ ____att+t+#+_____.s:...-r..aalaFTt■�la,Y-_eras_. ik Zs- !' iL ZIP :-• :-s,++,t_-._-.ya.-r____titt.-_ifwtirr._-.y ttr.__.a ,. ... +a jjja__-�w __.+.a•#+a_r__..r....__a�.rw•+rrfFi■;-rr�-._____---- f+ �� + ���..�� w•+_-++wrrr_a++ � j��lY+ ����� 'Ail J '\1Q l f#sa �. PS Form LI 3800,January 2023 PSN7530-02-000-9047 -Reverse ■ 1 1 1 1 •I -Reverse . Instructions . Postal Postal • r RECEIPTCERTIFIED MAIL®R RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAILn_R Ln Domestic Mail Only D• • nly Mz= Ln Q rn ti.ari t71f iFFn . `. • �. I sr�+'�i_ �Q{---�� r<rtlFied M II Feo ; _ _ _ orlifled iVlail Fee - ez fix#r Orvaot s Fr3 a f'cr,ac�4 raa to asfro) ktxtf$Sery s&Fees(check box,add fas as •• '`1 �� ,h r-� Return Receipt(hardcoPY) S _� r"� ❑Return R efpt(har�dcoPY) _ 00 []Return Receipt(electronic) $ _ POD(neO Q Return Receipt(electronic) $ :�ill C ❑Certtfied Mall Restricted Delivery $ _;_ Here C3 ❑Certifled Mall Restricted Delivery $ -.. � Postrnark , ❑Adult Signature Required $ ''l"i r`+ i ❑Adult Signature Required $ f .- MAY"") � ��.. . _ _ ru . : . . _ 2026 ❑Adult Signature Restricted Vollw,ary$ � ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Postage Postage , E3 _ MAY 2026 Iota -? ) �I� � 17 t� � - S Total Postage and Fees [t O $cIro SP9rtf ToJr�■- /��*•+■,l {.{� � ' FJ�.q■7.� {jam � dent Tc� w `{ �-1.¢�.rF..�r. +p`M .i'ar ___ �L__ _�a ##ti _i4" ails. -� __-� Vy ?as opxt rr iN Ir' e! .tom.,or x, - tr�si W6 Apr.A16.t'6F j� L7 0 Yo, P. ;6" CRY0 N-02UP_ +_._s--z s_a_a_+-a�-------.a+}�}ts:4-____r+a;�i.y-..._aaa-.as.a+s-. � -• td._.�_a.__ trt.r-__r__-',f�t,*#r�--_s_i�6T#l,ti_--_-.__ nl� Postal r w Postal r Service TM cc RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL®R RECEIPT m CERTIFIED MAILcR y/ Domestic Mail Only Domestic Mail Only [] 0 For delivery information, our -• www-usps.corn m _ + 9 CerUf e+d.Mail Erlfl�ied bail Fes -yl, •I' �! Er FaQEr Er ..;�•- �}. i ;�� +ram! 4:0' cO Extra Servrcas&-F ;&,ackbox,add m-upp coExtra Services$Fees(�h bl e,ddjoe as r - - Return Receipt ' Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ ❑ pt(hardcopy) $ � ❑Retum Receipt(electronic) $ Perlriark ❑Retum Receipt(electronic) $ C ❑Certtfled Mail Restricted Delivery $ - - Here ❑Centfled Mall Restricted Delivery S _ _ +'.�� �026 ❑Adult Signature Required $ rrLl ❑Adult Signature Required $• ru Adult Signature Restricted Delivery � ❑Adult Signature Restricted i�ol:�' $ � ❑ $ Postage e r Postage r .0 r - 22-0? $ r-q Total Pie and Fees Total Postage and Fees C7 Q Sbnf N III To ovve,r dL1 �. !• :i: .j` _r�i+.,•t.l.-Mrs._a+^v,.�___.►.srsa_wwr�f�-_-_.._ r+� �tfr-,-n- -J_�'iY - - �s.. L_ .� ;y +w,r�._�_�.a�•�� � et ar+�matt ry or j{ r?o. co et ancf {�!'.No.,or�C $ox O, Ln p Er r_-_-_a____-_------ I r ��� fj -.F..•- - � �_r_---- + l -4f i�t�_ _-_aP.i Ffi i••it ati� :____iT�+Ff 06 • • L11 1 - ; ;�i 1 • Reverse for TM TM Postal or Service U.S. Postal , r Service CERTIFIED �••. MAIL9 RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL" RECEIPT Domestic Mail .nly r.Y Domestic il / nly For delivery information,visit our website at www.u9ps,com'. For delivery information,visit our website at www.usps.com m m CrCertsfled Mall Fea - r:- Er Gerli s war!Mail Fea -_• -I, 117 1.I 1 r •e Extra ervf ,Fe as(ct;ack fix,jrdd tm��o r w 43 Extra Services&Fees(check box,add(to A&f-b r�r� r-q rM Retum Receipt(hardcopy) '-'' r-q ❑Retum Receipt(hardcopy) ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ Postmark', ❑Retum Receipt(electronic) $ Postmark r C3 ❑Certtfled Mail Restricted Delivery $ Fier i t' C3 ❑Certlfled Mali Restricted Delivery $ r ❑ AY 19 2026 Adult Signature Required $ ,� �- []Adult Signature Required $ •1.1__ Q Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ �` ru ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Ln Postage r r, - Ln Postage , '. 2026 ra dotal Postage andFoes r-q Total PosiWge and Fees 0 S Q t o �- � -�I �� _ Ecr Semi To �i � .ram _ �_ �a --- _a-.--�_ -------- --------------- Ih .- .rj �iL.ra' ��ti+ [ L � .t, IrV + �I lA�. ----- ....... we- ErLn Xro 11-7 6ty, ��7 rX + rasl_ a 1671 Er &fly,stari, r lot f . ` ■ ru Ln off E:3 For delivery information,visit our website at wwwIs.com". rn c, �• r•j r x - - _. � �. . Er Certlfied Mall F Er� 'co Extra Fps fchemk tw,add rf*-EM 41J. LI r� ❑Rc:utn Receipt(hardcopy) $ ----- — C3 Q Return Receipt(electronic) $ Postmark r— ❑Ceritfled Mail Restricted Delivery $ Here ru ❑Adutt Signature Required $ QAdult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ;r?^Ind, 1 -� Postage 11'l. � 202� Total Postage and Foes � .i �.:J C3 S Sent To Ir L co +w- +a. i.itif....t i•liti........ IV III- e•F . _. �. a i e. e_. ; r _ ., .. ya%jYk°ta 7 DI) D) o,s���`` MAY 15 2026 PLANPlItJG BOARD SOUTHOLD FIRE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 908 SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 (631) 765-4305 FAX (631) 765-5076 May 13, 2026 Mr. Brian Cummings, Senior Pianner Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Southold Free Library 53705 NYS Route 25, Southold SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Dear Brian: Please be advised that the Southold Fire District Board of Fire Commissioners have reviewed the site plan for the Southold Free Library and found that there is adequate fire protection for this property. The Board would like to reserve the right to review the above site plan if any changes occur to this property or to other property in the immediate area. Sincerely, arol A. Mi ier Fire District Secretary Pi3s H L COUNTY OF SUFFOLK MAY 1 1 2026 SOU 1 ilOLD TOWN EDWARD P.ROMAINE P1 `:N'0OAD SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING SARAN LANSDALE MAUREEN GETCHELL COMMISSIONER RORY WHELAN CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER May 11, 2026 Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Attn: Brian Cummings, Senior Planner Dear Mr. Cummings: Pursuant to Section 2391&m of the General Municipal Law,the following site plan which has been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan Address File Ni Southold Free Library Site Plan 1000 06100 0100 0150021015005 N/A NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action(s) associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, _4�/ .�C',�ifl By Victoria Malvone Joseph E. Sanzano, Planning Director Division of Planning and Environment JES/vm H.LEE DENNISON BLDG ■ 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HWY,2"d FI■ P.O.BOX 6100 ■ HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099 a(631)853-5191 ALBERT J. KRUPSKI JR, R� r fF : MICHAEL M. COLLINS, P.E. SUPERVISOR TOWN ENGINEER �. TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Tel. (631)-765—1560 Fax. (631)-765—9015 .:. % -I AI:I-. ()LL1NS TOIA' -SO[JTHOLD. Y L..S OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Brian Cummings May 7, 2026 Senior Planner Southold Town Planning Department 54375 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 J H D�CC�[NI n\V I — �LVnD Re: Southold Free Library MAY 0 8 2026 SCTM #: 1000 — 061. — 1 -- 15.2 & 15.5 SGUi n�LCti'i v�N Dear Mr. Cummings: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed Sheets 1-6 of the Southold Free Library site plan prepared by Jonathan Baker, R.A., dated March 16, 2026. Please have the applicant submit revised plans that address the following: 1. Provide the total area of soil disturbance for the project. 2. Provide the location of and details for the soil test hole_ 3. Provide drainage calculations and design details for a drainage system sufficient to collect, store and infiltrate the runoff from a 2" rainfall event for all new and modified areas associated with the plan. 4. Provide details for the construction of the new parking areas, walkways, curbing and the apron connecting the parking lot to Traveler Street. 5. The final plans must show the location of and details for all erosion and sediment controls including, but not limited to, the construction entrance, silt fencing, concrete washout area and soil stockpile area(s). If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. Sincerely, Michael M. Collins, P.E. Town Engineer 1. PB Resolution setting the hearing — This is your copy of the Planning Board resolution that set the public hearing. 2. List of adjacent Property owners to notify — This is the list of the adjacent property owners that you must mail the notice of hearing to. These notices must be mailed by certified mail, with return receipt. 3. Notice to adjacent property owners and copes of the tax map a es — These are the documents that must be mailed to the adjacent property owners (certified w/ return receipt). Some applicants like to include a cover letter, but a cover letter is not a requirement. 4. Affidavit of Postin, — This affidavit must be signed, notarized and returned to the planning department by May 29th with the certified mail receipts and any green cards that you have received. 5. Southold Town Code related to Public Hearings — This is just a copy of the Southold Town Code related to public hearings for your record. 6. Zoom Instructions — This is a copy of the zoom instruction for the public meeting for your record. One of these is included in the "notice to adjacent property owners". Feel free to call me with any questions. Jessica Michaelis, Planning Board Secretary 631-765-1938, jessicam@southoldtownny.gov OFFICE LOCATION: `I SO MA ILING AILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex �� l� P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY CATelephone: 631 765-1938 Owww.southoldtownny.gov i 00UNT`1,� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 5, 2026 Mr. Eric Martz Salty Roots Garden & Landscape Design P.O. Box 894 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Set Hearing and SEQR Classification Southold Free Library 53745 NYS Route 25 & 690 Traveler Street, Southold SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Dear Mr. Martz: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 4, 2026: WHEREAS, this amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM#61.-1-15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: new parking, accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the HB Zoning District, Southold.; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) has determined that the proposed action is a Type II Action as it falls within the following description for 6 NYCRR, Part 617.5(c)(9) construction or expansion of a primary or accessory/appurtenant, non-residential structure or facility involving less than 4,000 square feet of gross floor area and not involving a change in zoning or a use variance and consistent with local land use controls, but not radio communication or microwave transmission facilities; and be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this proposed action is a Type 11 Action under SEQRA as described above; and be it further Southold Free Library Page 2 May 5. 2026 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, June 1, 2026 at 5:01 p.m. for a Public Hearing on the site plan entitled "Southold Free Library" prepared by Jonathan Baker, Registered Architect, dated March 16, 2026. The public hearing packet regarding the Town's notification procedure and the sign & post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office at the Southold Town Annex when you are contacted to do so. Please return the Affidavit of Posting/Mailing. included in the packet. alone with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, May 29, 2026. The sign and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing is closed. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Respectfully, )"", H- /Z , James H. Rich III Chairman Encls. Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adiacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a Site Plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM# 1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the Hamlet Business (HB) Zoning District; 4. This amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: new parking, accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the HB Zoning District, Southold. 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. in the Planning department located in the Town Hall Annex, on the corner of Youngs Ave. & NYS Rte. 25, Southold (2"d FI. Former Capital One Bank). If you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631) 765-1938. Or by sending an e-mail message to: Jessica M(cD_southoldtownny.gov 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, June 1, 2026 at 5:01 p.m. at the Southold Town Annex Basement Meeting Room, 54375 NYS Route 25, Southold and virtually via the Zoom online platform; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in The Suffolk Times published in the town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. It is not necessary to attend this hearing to participate. Written comments received prior to the public hearing date are acceptable. Written comments may be submitted via letter or email to: JessicaWD-southoldtownny.gov Petitioner/Owner Name: Southold Free Library Date: 5/5/26 SVFFQ(�•� MAILING ADDRESS: OFFICE LOCATION: P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Gy Town Hall Annex = A 54375 State Route 25 N x Telephone:631-765-1938 y, www.southoldtownny.gov (cor.Main Rd.&Youngs Ave.) Southold,NY PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC MEETING Monday, June 1 , 2026 5:00 p.m. Options for public attendance: • In person: Location: Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold. or • To join via computer: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81389757106?pwd=BSYQ4xbCl mujjc ZYzOeuyYyenggbmX.1 Or Online at the website zoom.us, click "Join a Meeting" and enter the Meeting ID: 813 8975 7106 Password: 989285 • Join by telephone: Call 1(646) 558-8656 Enter Meeting ID and password when prompted (same as above) 61.-1-23 61.-4-1 61.4-9.3 Andrew Charron Hard Comer Partners LLC Brian Howard 295 Beckwith Ave PO BOX 1295 86 85th St Southold,NY 11971 Cutchogue,NY 11935 Brooklyn,NY 11209 61.-4-3 61.44 61.4-5.1 Joseph Cowley Town of Southold Southold Park Dist 630 Oriole Dr PO BOX 1179 Attn:Eileen Sayre Southold,NY 11971 53095 Route 25 PO BOX 1179 PO BOX 959 Southold,NY 11971 Southold,NY 119710930 61.-1-1 61.-I-16 61.-1-17 South d Free Library Jewell on Main LLC Dobi Inc PO OX 697 7I60 Hortons Ln Attn:Southold Pharmacy So thold,NY 11971 Southold,NY 11971 PO BOX 1177 Southold,NY 11971 61.-1-13.1 61 5 61.-1-15.3 2245 MCR LLC Southold ree Library Walter Stachecki C/o Marcello Pica Mng Mbr PO BO 697 18 Tredwell Ln PO BOX 652 South d,NY 119710697 Sag Harbor,NY 11963 Centereach,NY 11720 63.4-3 U Donna L. Dill, PE Manager-Civil Inspection Structures Department MTA Long Island Rail Road Hillside Maintenance Complex Mail Code 3143 93-59 183 Street Hollis, NY 11423 CD '40'. ill H l �g TSS�4S?Sa��m9 dHA d^mnd e e�MM; ge� i ,' �s. ` • 0•'3 r/' a rys5 'b; • sum- � •,� �,1l� � 1 'a ... � Nm .. Z YI I'• 6 "�.• a 7; ! � R •� e ' - ..y gpl55�hV,-"F, ��Y, 11 {r� ��• � < mm. ; � g t • � 't. �' 8 /iYr n LL x � $ �_ - - •,y v €gyp fii�� 4� g .i,� �•m , ors.`. � ��� o � � � Jul o`a• 3 ;s x w.,3 E s s ,�; J,. ._ - .. S°" •' ze a '' � I I I I I; uas I <3sy eti, III b�..oy:. �„ ., �"oH 5E n ', a ••.ii�7 `� 64� " .�70 �f' n � ��:QP H I n Lh R� �Z•"':��-+•... BSO'ONo36336 lauw •'s g,-��• .• a nvis � V �@ I IJIJS •` n%Ra$$`gR3"a6%%% �aggc"nn69$3=.�%$�3�3bnedg 9$�083 eta>�?o 9effia$cs$=-BgeSeB°=$$ MUM AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING MAY 2P PL _LR D LAINMOOVO This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as .� � �_ -to � -- '�� r � �� � �� ��� by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for at least seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on S.,/tt I have sent notices by certified mail — return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on �;� �} . - ��v� � . �` L I- f Y ins .1Z Your Name (print) 5S! tore - n po cl -F, jvq o�4;-6,L Address Date Notary Public CAROLINE M MACARTHUR Notary Public-State of New York No.0IMA6384635 Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission Expires DLIc 17,2026 PLEASE RE'TURN THI S A FFI DA t/I T, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS B Y.- 12: noon,--F_ri..,_, 5/29/26 Re: Southold Free Library Parking SCTM#: 1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Date of Public Hearing: Monday, June 1, 2026, 5:01 p.m 7/18/24, 1:49 PM Town of Southold, NY Public Hearings,Notice of Town of Southold, NY Thursday, July 18, 2024 Chapter 55. Public Hearings, Notice of [HISTORY:Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12-27-1995 by L.L. No. 25-1995. Amendments noted where applicable.] § 55-1 . Providing notice of public hearings. [Amended 6-3-2003 by L.L. No. 12-2003] Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application or petition is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. Notice relating to a public hearing on an application or petition shall be provided as follows: A. Town responsibility for publication of notice. The reviewing board or commission shall cause a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. Applicant or petitioner responsibility for posting and mailing notice. An application or petition, initiated, proposed or requested by an applicant or petitioner, other than a Town board or commission, shall also be subject to additional notice requirements set forth below: (1) The applicant or petitioner is required to erect the sign provided by the Town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application or petition abuts, giving notice of the application or petition, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than 10 feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant, petitioner or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. (2) The applicant or petitioner is required to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the property included in the application or petition. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application or petition and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The notice shall include description of the street location and area of the subject property, nature of relief or approval involved, and date, time and place of hearing. The applicant, petitioner or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. § 55-2, Videoconferencing for public meetings. [Added 6-21-2022 by L.L. No. 6-2022] The Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes members of the Town Board and all members of the Town's public bodies to participate in meetings using videoconferencing technology in a manner consistent with Public Officers Law § 103-a and the Town's videoconferencing policy adopted by the Town Board. httnc•//r,rnrio4Fr1 n 1m inNR(1ndF77nt i ir1=S1 S7417 �/� OFFICE LOCATION: {�o��S �QGy MAI PINOBoADD9 ESS: Town Hall Annex j Southold,NY 11971-0959 54375 State Route 25 y x Telephone:631-765-1938 �.(cor.Main Rd.&Youngs Ave.) O � `�` www.southoldtownny.gov Southold,NY PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC MEETING Monday, June 1 , 2026 5:00 p.m. Options for public attendance: • In person: Location: Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold. or • To join via computer: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81389757106?pwd=BSYQ4xbCl mujjc ZYzOeuyYyenggbmX.1 Or Online at the website zoom.us, click "Join a Meeting" and enter the Meeting ID: 813 8975 7106 Password: 989285 • Join by telephone: Call 1(646) 558-8656 Enter Meeting ID and password when prompted (same as above) OFFICE LOCATION: �QF SO(/ry MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ��� Ol0 P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY N � Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 5, 2026 Mr. Eric Martz Salty Roots Garden & Landscape Design P.O. Box 894 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Set Hearing and SEQR Classification Southold Free Library 53745 NYS Route 25 & 690 Traveler Street, Southold SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Dear Mr. Martz: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 4, 2026: WHEREAS, this amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM#61.-1-15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: new parking, accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the HB Zoning District, Southold.; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) has determined that the proposed action is a Type II Action as it falls within the following description for 6 NYCRR, Part 617.5(c)(9) construction or expansion of a primary or accessory/appurtenant, non-residential structure or facility involving less than 4,000 square feet of gross floor area and not involving a change in zoning or a use variance and consistent with local land use controls, but not radio communication or microwave transmission facilities; and be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this proposed action is a Type 11 Action under SEQRA as described above; and be it further Southold Free Library Page 2 May 5, 2026 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, June 1, 2026 at 5:01 p.m. for a Public Hearing on the site plan entitled "Southold Free Library" prepared by Jonathan Baker, Registered Architect, dated March 16, 2026. The public hearing packet regarding the Town's notification procedure and the sign & post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office at the Southold Town Annex when you are contacted to do so. Please return the Affidavit of Posting/Mailing, included in the packet, along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, May 29, 2026. The sign and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing is closed. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Respectfully, James H. Rich III Chairman Encls. From: Cummings, Brian A. Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2026 9:37 AM To: Westermann, Caitlin psiRt.- B C - 714 ct JI-4Cc: Michaelis,Jessica7 --'' Subject: FW: Southold Library Pocket Park APR J 0 ��ar.'.4., SOUTHOLD70"Ai PLANNING EM,D Brian Cummings Senior Planner Southold Town Planning Board 54375 NYS Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (531755-1938 From:Corwin, Robert<robertc@southoldtownny.gov> Sent:Thursday,April 30,, 2026 8:OS AM To: Cummings, Brian A.<brian.cummings@town.southold.ny.us> Subject:Southold Library Pocket Park In reference to the proposed pocket park at 53705 & 53745 SCTM#61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 1 have no opinion or comments for the proposed site plan. Robert E Corwin Southold Town Fire Marshal 934-231-0968 k 1;4' From: Baylinson, Lester Pei RLI i3C7 /*iC� A+ To: Cummings, Brian A.; Cerezo Mara Cc: Michaelis, Jessica;VVestennenn' Caitlin A P:R2 9 2026 ]D Subject: TM# 61.-1-152-15.5 Southold Free Library SOUTHOLD TOWN Hello, there are no open violations on these parcels C)Kto Proceed . LB, Have a good night � 1 OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY CA! Telephone: 631 765-1938 vvrww.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �V MEMORANDUM To: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector Tracey L. Dwyer, Permits Examiner From: Brian Cummings, Senior Planner C Date: April 27, 2026 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Southold Free Library 53705 & 53745 Main Road, Southold SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Zoning District: Hamlet Business (HB) The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. This amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM#61.-l- 15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: new parking, accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the HB Zoning District, Southold. Thank you for your cooperation. Encls: Site Plan Application Site Plan OFFICE LOCATION: NIAIL.ING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.Q. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 `` Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) c Telephone: 631 765-1938 Southold, NY wvcwv.southoldtovvnny.gov COUNTi 3� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM. To: Lester Baylinson, Ordinance Inspector Robert Corwin, Fire Marshal From: Brian Cummings, Senior Planner Date: April 27, 2026 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Southold Free Library 53705 & 53745 Main Road, Southold SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Zoning District: Hamlet Business (HB) The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and any violations on record, if applicable. This amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM#61.-l- 15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: new parking, accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the HB Zoning District, Southold. Thank you for your cooperation. Laserfiche: Planning, Applications, ,Site Plans, Pending, SCTM#1000-61.-I-15.2 & 15.5 OFFICE LOCATION: A AILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex � P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 75-193$ .r*, mrww.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Michael Collins, Town Engineer From: Brian Cummings, Senior Planne Date: April 27, 2026 Re: Site Plan for Southold Free Library Application Name: Southold Free Library Tax Map Number: 1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Location: 53705 & 53745 Main Road, Southold Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map Dated: Preliminary Subdivision Map Dated: Final Subdivision Map Dated: Road Profiles Dated: Grading and Drainage Plans Dated: Other Dated: Site Plan Dated: Revised Site Plan Dated: Grading and Drainage Plans Dated: Other (AS BUILT) Dated: Project Description: This amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM#61.-I-15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: new parking, accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the HB Zoning District, Southold. Thank you for your cooperation. OFFICE LOCATION: ' MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 " Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 + w-ww.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Heather Lanza, LWRP Coordinator From: Brian Cummings, Senior Planne QKC) Date: April 27, 2026 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Southold Free Library 53705 & 53745 Main Road, Southold SCTM#1000-51.-1-15.2 & 15.5 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. The file is available at your convenience. This amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM#6 1.-1- 15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: new parking, accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the HB Zoning District, Southold. Thank you for your cooperation. OFFICE LOCATION: � MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Telephone: fi31 765-1938 vvww.southoldtownny.gov MUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 27, 2026 Mr. Melik Tariq NYS Department of Transportation 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Re: Proposed site Plan Application Review for Southold Free Library 53705 & 53745 NYS Route 25, Southold SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Zoning District: HB — Hamlet Business Dear Mr. Tariq: The purpose of this request is to seek comments from your agency. Please provide the following, as applicable: 1. Comments or requirements the Planning Board should take into consideration while reviewing the proposed project; 2. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated; 3. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; The following contains information pertaining to the project under review. For further information, please feel free to contact this office. Project Name: Southold Free Library Parking Address: 53705 & 53745 Route 25, Southold Tax Map #: 1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Requested Action: This amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM#61.-l-15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: new parking, accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the HB Zoning District, Southold. Southold Free Library Parking — Page 2 —April 27, 2026 SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type (X) Type II 617.5(C)(9) ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: Brian Cummings, Senior Planner (631) 765-1938 Enclosures: • Site Plan Application Form • Site Plan(s) If there are any questions, you can contact us at (631)765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully, CUOJA U UA VAt Brian Cummings Senior Planner OFFICE LOCATION: ' MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex " F.Q. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Telephone: 631 765-�1938 Southold, NY www.southoldtowrnny.gov coulml PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Suffolk County Planning Commission From: Brian Cummings, Senior Planner - Date: April 27, 2026 RE: Proposed Site Plan Application Review— Southold Free Library 0 Request for Comments pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 The purpose of this request is to seek comments from your agency. Please provide the following, as applicable: 1. Comments or requirements the Planning Board should take into consideration while reviewing the proposed project; 2. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated; 3. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; Project Name: Southold free Library Parking Address: 53705 & 53745 Route 25, Southold Tax Map #: 1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Requested Action: This amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM#61.-I-15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: new parking, accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the H B Zoning District, Southold.. SEQRA Classification: } Type I (X) Type 11 617.5(C)(9) ( ) Unlisted Southold Free Library Parking — Page 2 --April 27, 2026 For further information, please feel free to contact this office. Contact Person: Brian Cummings, Senior Planner (631) 765-1938 Enclosures: • site PIan Application Form • Site Plan(s) 2 OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (car.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.)Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 vv-ww.southoldtow-nny.gov eouw, PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 27, 2026 Ms. Carol Miller c/o Southold Fire District P.O. Box 908 Southold, NY 11971 Re,, Request for Review: Proposed Site Plan for Southold Free Library 53705 NYS Route 25, Southold SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Dear Ms. Miller: The enclosed Site Plan Application is being referred to you for your comment on matters of interest to the fire department, including access and any other issue that may be of concern or relevance to this application. Please respond with your recommendations at your earliest convenience. This amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM##61.-1- 15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: new parking, accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the 1-113 Zoning District, Southold. Please contact me at (631)765-1938 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation. Res Dectfully Brian Cummings Senior Planner Encls.: Site Plan Application Site Plan OFFICE LOCATTON: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (car. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) � Telephone: 631 765-1938 Southold, NY vvww.southol dtawrYny.goy ]COU01� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Albert J. Krupski Jr., Supervisor Members of the Town Board Denis Noncarrow, Town Clerk cc: Benjamin Johnson, Town Attorney From: Brian Cummings, Senior Plane -~= Date: April 27, 2026 Re: Site Plan for Southold Free Library 53705 & 53745 Main Road, Southold SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and a determination of jurisdiction, if applicable. This amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM#61.-1- 15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: new parking, accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the HB Zoning District, Southold. Thank you for your cooperation. (in Laser Fiche: Planning, Applications, Site Plans, Pending, SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5) Southold Town Planning Board Work Session —April 20, 2026 — P 4:00 P.M. —Applications Project Name: SMB_Apartments SCTM#: 71000-63.-3-26 Location- 56025 NYS Route 25, Southold Descrip tion, This site plan proposes a new 7,061-square-foot multiple dwelling with six units on a 1.6-acre property with an existing mixed-use building in the Hamlet Business (HB Zoning District. Status. Pendin Action- Review for Determination Attachments: Staff Report Project Name: 1160 Travelers Street Barn I SCTM#: , 1000-61.-2-2 Location- 1160 Traveler Street, Southold Description: This site plan application proposes the expansion and conversion of an existing ±900 square foot barn into a ±1,436 square foot professional interior design studio on a ±0.29-acre parcel located within the Hamlet -,-Business (H B),Zoning District. statusp, New Application Action: Review for Completeness Attachments-. I Staff Report _ ! FProject Name- Hampton Oyster Co. Agricultural SCTM#: 1000-117.-7-32 Building Location: 1000 First Street, New Suffolk Description- This agricultural site plan is for the proposed construction of a 1,120 sq. ft. equipment storage building for aquaculture operations (no basement) on 0.25 acres in the IVIII Zoning District. [—Status: New Application Action'. Review for Completeness Attachments: Staff Report Project Name- Southold Free Library Parking SCTM#- 1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5 Location, 53745 NYS Route 25, 690 Traveler Street, Southold Description, This amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM#1000-61.-1-15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: new parking, accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the HB Zoning District, Southold.. Status: i New�Application Action Review for Completeness Attachments: Staff Rem Southold Planning Department Staff Report Site Plan Application Work Session - Completeness Date April 20, 2026 Prepared By: Brian Cummings I. Application Information Project Title- Southold Free Library Pocket Park & Parking Applicant: Lisa Davidoff Tax Map Number: 61--1-15.2 & 15.5 Project Location: 53705 & 53745 Main Road Hamlet: Southold Zoning District: Hamlet Business - HB 11. Description of Project Type of Site Plan: Commercial Acreage of Project Site: 0.93ac + 0.35ac = +-1.28 acres (after merger) Building size ±10,925 sq. ft. (existing library) This amended site plan is for the proposed merger of two adjacent lots (SCTM#61.-1- 15.2 & 15.5) and the construction of a pocket park with improvements to include: accessible pathways, new stairs and retaining walls, a stone amphitheater, seating and landscaped areas, a shaded activity space, lighting, irrigation, utilities, and a storage shed on 1.28 acres (after merger) in the HB Zoning District, Southold. III: Completeness Review A. Proposed construction: The project will involve tree removal and site grading, including the relocation of approximately 4,900 cubic feet (181.5 cubic yards) of existing soil and the import of approximately 31,380 cubic feet (1,162 cubic yards) of clean fill/topsoil to achieve final grades and support the proposed improvements. Drainage inlets and dry wells will be installed to capture water runoff. a. Parking: six stalls (employee parking) to be removed from lower lot (15.2} and construction of eleven (11} parking stalls on upper lot (15.5) b. Lot Coverage,. 10% existing; 10% proposed; 40% maximum c. Landscape Coverage: 57% existing; 62% proposed; 25% minimum d. Plans provided: i. Sheet 1 - Existing Site Conditions 1 ii. Sheet 2 — Site Development Plan iii. Sheet 3 — Landscape Plan iv. Sheet 4 — Grading and Drainage Plan Storm v. Sheet 5 — Cut/Fill Plan vi. Sheet 6 — Photometric Plan: two submitted, one preferred and one consistent with Chapter 172 B. SEQRA Classification: Type 11 Action as it falls within the following description for 6 NYCRR, Part 617.5(c)(9) construction or expansion of a primary or accessory/appurtenant, non-residential structure or facility involving less than 4,000 square feet of gross floor area and not involving a change in zoning or a use variance and consistent with local land use controls, but not radio communication or microwave transmission facilities. C. Referrals and Approvals from outside agencies: a. Referrals: Town Engineer, ARC(?), Fire Marshal, Southold FD, Town Board, LWRP, Building Department b. Outside agencies: none V: Planning Board items to consider: 1) Accept the above referenced site plan application as complete for review along with the following: a) Distribute referrals of the proposed application to at least those agencies listed above; b) Classify the action as Type 11 under SEQRA as detailed above; c) At the May 4, 2026 Public Meeting, set the Public Hearing for June 1, 2026; d) Pursuant to §280-133(C), the following items are recommended to be waived: i) Separate key map showing the locations, names and widths of all rights-of- way within 500' of the subject site; ii) Separate key map showing all existing buildings and uses within 200) of the subject parcel and include key elements of those existing sites (e.g. buildings, curb cuts, parking area(s), landscaping, etc.). Staff: use aerials, GIS and site visit 2 Southold Planning Department Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness - Section 280-'133 Project Name: Southold Library Completed by: Brian Cummings Date: April 20, 2026 Received Comment A. Submission of a complete site plan application shall consist of: (1) A completed site plan application form. (2) The site plan review fee, as specified in Subsection B $75Q SP below. Editor's Note: See now § 280-138, Fee schedule for site plan applications. (3) A completed environmental assessment form. Short EAF {4} Nine copies of the site plan. (5) Four copies of a property survey, certified by a licensed �l land surveyor. B. Standards. Site plan design shall include the following items: (1) Technical data: (a) The lot, block and section number of the property, taken �l from the latest tax records. (b) The name and address of the landowner on record: �l [1] The names and addresses of adjoining landowners. [2] The name and address of the applicant, if not the same as the landowner. (c) The name and address of the person, firm or organization preparing the map, sealed with the applicable New York State license seal and signature. (d) Date, graphic scale and North point, whether true or �l magnetic.; if magnetic, show the date of reading. (e} A survey prepared by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. The site plan may reference a land surveyor's map or base reference map. All distances shall be in �l feet and hundredths of a foot. All angles shall be given to the nearest 10 seconds or closer. The error of closure shall not exceed one in 10,000. (f) The locations, names and widths of all rights-of-way waive within 500 feet of property lines. If none exist within 500 X feet of the subject property, indicate the distance to the nearest intersection with a public street. (g} A separate key map showing location and owners of all waive adjoining lands within 500 feet, as shown on the latest X tax records, at a scale of one inch equals 100 feet. (h) The location, width and purpose of all existing and proposed easements, setbacks, reservations and areas �l dedicated to public use within or adjoining the property. (i) A complete outline of other existing easements, deed �l Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness Southold Planning Department restrictions or covenants applying to the property. '} Existing zoning, including zone lines and dimensions. (k) Site plans drawn at the scale of one inch equals 20 feet. If all required information cannot be shown clearly on one plan, the information should be separated as follows: [1] Alignment and schedule plan. [2] Grading and drainage. [3] Landscaping. [4] Other, e.g., site utilities. (2) Natural features: Received Comment (a) Existing contours with intervals of two feet or less, referred to mean sea level as per United States Geological Survey datum. (b) Boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, tidal bays, saltwater marshes, beaches and all freshwater bodies, including wetlands and intermittent streams, perimeter boundaries of shoreline bluffs, dunes and beaches. (c) The location of existing natural features, including but not limited to natural drainage swales, watercourses, wooded areas and wetlands, as defined by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Board of Trustees of Southold Town, marshes, ponds, dunes, bluffs, beaches, kettleholes, escarpments, wildlife habitats, flood hazard areas, erosion-prone areas and trees of six inches in diameter at a point three feet above the trunk base. (d) The location of any existing cultural and historical features within 500 feet of the property boundaries. (3) Existing building *structures and utilities.: (a) The locations, dimensions and outlines of all buildings, as defined in § 280-4 of this chapter, and all uses of the site. (b) Paved areas, including parking areas, sidewalks and vehicular access between the site and public streets. (c) The locations, dimensions, grades and flow directions of any existing culverts, waterlines or sewage disposal systems, as well as other underground and aboveground utility poles and utility lines within and adjacent to the, property. (d) The location and use of all buildings and structures, Waive including curbcuts, within 200 feet of the boundary of the X subject property. 2 Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness Southold Plan n i ng Department (4) Proposed construction: Received Comment (a) The location of proposed buildings or structural improvements, indicating setbacks from all property lines and horizontal distances from existing structures. (b) The location and design of all uses not requiring structures, such as off-street parking and loading areas and pedestrian circulation. (c) The location, direction, power level and time of use for any proposed outdoor lighting or public address. systems. (d) The location and plans for any outdoor signs must be in N/A accordance with applicable sign regulations. (e) The location and details of aprons, curbs, sidewalks, fencing (type and location), and grading, including existing and proposed topography with two-foot contours (on site and 200 feet beyond the property line) and spot elevations for buildings and all structures, drainage calculations, details of drainage structures and watershed areas, where applicable.. (f) Grading and drainage plans shall be based upon site stormwater retention, in conformance with Chapter 161, Highway Specifications. (g) The location and listing of landscaping, buffering and street tree plans, including type, material, size, quantity and location. (h) The location of water and sewer mains, electrical service, cablevision and telephone installations, ground transformers, fire wells and fire hydrants and/or any alternate means of water supply and sewage disposal and treatment. (i) Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing N/A the proposed use of floor area. Notes: Site Plan Application elements waivers: § 280-133 C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Planning Board shall have the discretion to waive any or all of the requirements of this § 280-133 by resolution at a duly noticed public meeting, for those applications involving modifications to existing structures with no substantial change to the existing footprint, where the Planning Board determines that such modifications or any change in use will not require significant changes to existing major site design features, as well as applications involving uses strictly related to agriculture (but excepting retail winery operations), if it determines such requirements are not necessary to protect and maintain the public health, safety, or welfare and to further the objectives set forth in § 280-129. 3 Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness P13, Itsc DCDDOWDD PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Southold Free Library): MAR 3 0 2026 SOUTHOLDTOWN PLANNING BOARD (al. - 1 -- I . Z 15'.S This project proposes combining two adjacent lots into a single lot and creating a new pocket park on the site of the existing parking area at the Southold Free Library. The existing parking will be relocated to the upper library entrance. Improvements include the construction of an ADA-compliant pathway, new stairs, a new retaining wall, a stacked stone amphitheater, seating areas, planting and lawn areas, and an activity area with a shade sail. Site amenities will include lighting throughout the park, a hose bib, electrical outlets, irrigation and the installation of a new storage shed. The project will involve tree removal and site grading, including the relocation of approximately 4,900 cubic feet of existing soil and the import of approximately 31,380 cubic feet of clean fill/topsoil to achieve final grades and support the proposed improvements. Drainage inlets and dry wells will be installed to capture water runoff. G (�C IMPWERM) SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD MAR 3 0 2026 SITE PLAN APPLICATION FORM PLANNING BOARD Site Plan Name and Location Site Plan Name: Southold Free Library Pocket Park Application Date: Suffolk County Tax Map#1000- 61 _ 01 _ 15.2 Other SCTM#s 1000 - 61 - 01 - 15.5 Street Address: 53705 & 53745 Main Rd. Hamlet: Southold Distance to nearest intersection: 135' Type of Site Plan: V New Amended Residential Zoning District HB Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and phone number for the peo'le below: Property Owner Southold Free Library Street 53705 Main Rd. City Southold State NY Zip 11971 Home Telephone Other631.765.2077 Applicant Lisa Davidoff Street 1015 Kimbery Lane City Southold State NY Zip 11971 Home Telephone Other Applicant's Agent or Representative: Contact Person(s)* Eric Martz Street PO Box 894 CityMattituck State NY Zip 11952 Office Telephone Other 917.916.3724 *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Site Plan Application Form 211812010 Site Data Proposed construction type: New Modification of Existing Structure Agricultural Change of use Property total acreage or square footage: 1.28 ac./sq. ft. Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: 0.96 ac./sq. ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes No If yes, explain: Does the parcel(s) meet the Lot Recognition standard in Town Code §280-9 Lot Recognition? Y \/N If"yes", explain (and attach any necessary documentation—title report, subdivision approval, etc.) Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 03 /06 /2026 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes No If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: Library List all proposed property uses:Library, Park Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: 10 % Proposed lot coverage: 10 % Gross floor area of existing structure(s): 10,925 sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): N/A Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: 6 #of proposed spaces: 15 Loading Berth: Yes No Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: 57 % Proposed landscape coverage: 62 % Wetlands: Is this property within 500' of a wetland area? Yes No Maybe I, the undersigned, certify that all the above information is true. Signature of Preparer: Date: 3 2 . Z O 2 Site Plan Application Form 211812010 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Southold Free Library): This project proposes combining two adjacent lots into a single lot and creating a new pocket park on the site of the existing parking area at the Southold Free Library. The existing parking will be relocated to the upper library entrance. Improvements include the construction of an ADA-compliant pathway, new stairs, a new retaining wall, a stacked stone amphitheater, seating areas, planting and lawn areas, and an activity area with a shade sail. Site amenities will include lighting throughout the park, a hose bib, electrical outlets, irrigation and the installation of a new storage shed. The project will involve tree removal and site grading, including the relocation of approximately 4,900 cubic feet of existing soil and the import of approximately 31,380 cubic feet of clean fill/topsoil to achieve final grades and support the proposed improvements. Drainage inlets and dry wells will be installed to capture water runoff. FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: March 6, 2026 TO: Southold Free Library PO BOX 697 Southold,NY, 11971 Please take notice that your application dated December 26, 2025: For permit to: merge two adjacent lots at: Location of property: 53745 Rte. 25, Southold & 690 Travelers St., Southold,NY 11971 County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 61 Block 1 Lot 15.2 and County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 61 Block 1 Lot 15.5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposal to merge tax map# 1000-61.4-15.2 to the western adjacent lot tax map# 1000-61.-1-15.5 is not permitted without the approval of the Southold Town Planning Board. The proposed merger will create a conforming lot in the HB district. You may now apply to the Planning Board directly. Q "f. �)EA LA thorized Sig tore Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Department Southold Planning Department Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. Your Name: Martz, Eric, B Last, First, middle initial unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name. Nature of Application: (Check all that apply) Subdivision or Re-subdivision Site Plan Other(Please name other activity) Do you personally(or through your company, spouse, sibling,parent or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship includes by blood,marriage or business interest. "Business interest"means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. Yes No y If you answered"Yes"complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of the person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling,parent or child is(check all that apply): A.the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation); B.the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a noncorporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C. an officer,director,partner or employee of the applicant; or D.the actual applicant Description of Relationship: Submitted this=l day of 0 20 Z 6 J 1 Signature Print Name Disclosure Form Southold Planning Department Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. Your Name: Davidoff, Lisa, J Last,First,middle initial unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name. Nature of Application: (Check all that apply) Subdivision or Re-subdivision Site Plan Other(Please name other activity) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship includes by blood,marriage or business interest. `Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. Yes No If you answered"Yes"complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of the person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent or child is(check all that apply): A.the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation); B.the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a noncorporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C. an officer,director,partner or employee of the applicant;or D.the actual applicant Description of Relationship: Submitted this 6 day off 202 Signature i t)(d 1 ( �n (n&PL,11ll Print Name L� S[� •��y i ©"� Disclosure Form APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Lisa Davidoff being duly sworn, deposes and says that-le resides at 1015 mb��_ 1�� Ian[ Lt_+h0 ljN_ State of New York, and that he is the owner of property located at 53705 & 53745 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 . SCTM# 100-61-01-15.2 & 15.5 , or that he is the Board of Trustees President of the Southold Free Library (Title) (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) and said Corporation is the owner of the above property, which is hereby making a Site Plan application; that there are not existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan;that the title to the entire parcel,including all rights-of-way,has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be alter or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plan as approved by the Planning Board. Sign Owner Sign d �. (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) Sworn to me this 1`-�� 67 L da of 73 ,IIA-ZIV 20� � y CAROLINE M MACARTHUR Notary Public State of New York No.o1MA6384635 Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission Expires Dec 17,2026 No Public Authorization Affidavit Applicant authorization of an agent I, Lisa J. Davidoff, authorized applicant for a site plan application on the property identified as SCTM# 1000-61-01-15.2 & 15.5 in Southold NY,hereby authorize Eric Martz to act as our agent and handle all necessary work involved with the subdivision/site plan application process for this property with the Southold Planning Board. J. Signatur & cJ CAROLINE M MACAMUR Notary Public-State of New York NO.01MA6384635 Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission Expires Dec 17,2026 Sworn before me this day of )�rniZv.fX kl 2006 Notary Public Town of Southold Q00WIMo LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM MAR 3 0 2026 TOWN A. INSTRUCTIONS SLANNIN BOAR PLANNING BOARD 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 61 - 01 - 15.2 & 15.5 PROJECT NAME Southold Free Library Pocket Park The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board V Building Dept. L�/J Board of Trustees ❑ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: See attached project description. Location of action: 53705 & 53745 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Site acreage: 1.28 acres Present land use:Library Present zoning classification: HB 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Eric Martz (b) Mailing address: PO Box 894 Mattituck, NY 11952 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( )917.916.3724 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No IV If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. V Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Project will enhance community character, preserve open space, and minimizes adverse effects of development. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No 2 Not Applicable Project will have no negative impact on historic or archaeological resources. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Fv-lYes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Project will enahnce visual quality in the Town of Southold Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No IV Not Applicable Project will have no negative impact on flooding or erosion. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑Yes ❑ No 12Not Applicable Pro-ject will have no negative impact on water quality or supply. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III— Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes [:] No �A Not Applicable Project will have no negative impact on Town of Southold ecosystems. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No V Not Applicable Project will have no negative impact on air quality. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No M Not Applicable ProJect will have no negative impact on the environment PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes❑ No 2 Not Applicable Project will have no negative impact on public access. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No W Not Applicable Project will have no negative impact on water-dependent uses. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Project will have no negative impact on marine resources. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No LA Not Applicable Protect will have no negative impact on agricultural lands. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Q Not Applicable Project will have no negative impact on energy of mineral resources. PREPARED BY Ed TITLE Landscape Designer DATE 03.26.2026 Amended on 811105 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form L�Odd C- MAR 3 0 2026 Instructions for Completing OUTHOLD TOWN S FPLANNING BOARD Part 1 -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of art e O'nses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part I based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 -Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Southold Free Library Pocket Park Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 53705 & 53745 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Brief Description of Proposed Action: See attached project description. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 917.916.3724 Eric Martz E-Mail: eric@saltyrootsny.com Address: PO Box 894 City/PO: State: Zip Code: Mattituck NY 11952 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? V If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s)name and permit or approval: 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 1.28 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.96 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 1.28 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑ Industrial 'Commercial ❑Residential(suburban) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): ❑ Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? 0 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: V 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: N/A V 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13. a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? / If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: V 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑ Shoreline �❑ orest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland `� Urban ❑ Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? ` / 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO❑YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO❑ YES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: _ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ,,p Applicant/sponsor name: il' i L /��of L Date: LZ-112-0Z Signature: Part 2- lmpa ssessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail,identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. o Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. o Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 IIIIIII II Il Illll Illll Iflll IIlII Illll IIIII Illll IIII IIII I Ifllll lull lull IIII IIII SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: DEEDS/DDD Recorded: 09/06/2001 Number of Pages: 4 At: 10:28:29 AM TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 01-05085 LIBER: D00012140 PAGE: 016 District: Section: Block: Lot: 1000 061.00 01.00 015.002 EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS Deed Amount: $275,000.00 Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument Exempt Exempt Page/Filing $12.00 NO Handling $5.00 NO COE $5.00 NO EA-CTY $5.00 NO EA-STATE $25.00 NO TP-584 $5.00 NO Cert.Copies $0.00 NO RPT $15.00 NO SCTM $0.00 NO Transfer tax $0.00 NO Comm.Pres $0.00 NO Fees Paid $72 .00 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 01-05085 THIS PAGE IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT Edward P.Romaine County Clerk, Suffolk County 1 2 i Number of pages RECORDED 2001 SeD 06 10:28:29 qM TORRENS Eduiard P.RorAa_4 ne CLERK OF Serial ff SUFFOLK COUNTY L D00012140 Certificate F 016 DT# 01-050:35 Prior Of.I# Deed/Mortgage Instrument Deed/Mortgage Tax Stamp Recording/Filing Stamps q 1 FEES Page/riling Fee Mortgage Amt. Handling 1. Basic Tax 1'i-5 4 2.Additional Tax Notation Sub Total EA-52 17(County) Sub'Total Spec./Assit. Or EA-5217(State) Spec./Add. R.P.T.S.A. \� yL��' TOT.Ivt"1'G.7'A;( Dual Town Dual County Comut.of Ed. 5 Ott I leld for Apportionment Affidavit � _ _ ,<, 4 Transfer'Tax Mansion"lax Certified Copy � The property covered by this mortgage is or Reg.Copy will be improved by a one or two family Sub"Total dwelling only. Other YES or NO GRAND TOTAL If NO,see appropriate tax clause on page Y of this instrument. Real Property Tax Service Agency Verification L��T 6 Community Preservatioxx Fund S Dist. Section 13lock Lot Consideration Amount S o �bO c�Pr -rax. nue � (a�►JP_.L DatN%-E GI Improved Initials�'y'Gj Vacant Land Satisfactions/Discharges/Releases List Property Owners Mailing Addres. 1'L) RECORD&RETURN TO: TD Rudolph Bruer.Esq_ `I'D P.O.Box 1466 Southold New York 11971 s 'Title Company lnforestatioij Co. Name 34'2" _- Title# Suffolk Count Recor din & Endorsement Page This page fortis part of the attached --^ _._... _ made by: (SPECIFY TYPE OF INSTRi]7V1ENT') Peter J. The pirctnises herein is situated in SUFFOL.K COUNTY,NEW YORK Southold TO In the Township of Cnuttinld Free t.ihnn In the VILLAGESouthold or I IAMLi=:I'of BOXES 5 TI iRU 9 MUST BE TYPED OR PIUNT ED 1N BLACK INK ONLY PIUOR TO RF.COIZDING OR HUNG. (OVER) Duerr Taxpayer., Your satisf-action of inortgage has been filed in my office and I am enclosing (lio original copy for your records. it'a portion of your monthly mortgage payment included your property taxes. you will now need I:U c o»t •rrt _laral Tr��i n Tam tZecc�ivcr scLthat you may tic htlled ireet y for all Cuti.irc property_W hills. Ducal properly taxes arc payable twice a year: on or before Januan• 10"• and on or before May 31•.•. failure to make payments in a timely fasl-rion could result in a penalty. Please contact your local Town Tax Receiver with any questions regarding property tax payment. Babylon Town Receiver of Taxes Riverhead Town Receiver of Taxes 200 East Sunrise Highway 200 1Iowell Averiuc North Lftidcnhurst, N.Y. 1 17.57 Riverhead. N.Y. 11901 (631) 957-3004 (631) 727-3200 Brookhaven Town Receiver of Taxes Shelter Island Town Receiver of Tzixes 250 bast Main Street Shelter Island Tower Hall Port Jefferson. N.Y. 11777 Shelter Island, N.Y. 1 1964 (631) 473-0236 (631) 749-3338 Fast I•larnpl:on Town Receiver of Taxcs Smithtown Town Receiver of Taxes 300 Nantigo Place 99 West Main Street Easl Hampton, NT.Y. 1 1937 Smithtown. N.Y. 1 ]787 (631) 324-27 7 0 (631) 360-761 O I-luutington 'Town Receiver of Taxes SouthanipLon Town Receiver of Talcs 100 Main Street 116 14arnpton Road Huntington'. N.Y. 11743 Southhampton, N.Y. 11968 (631) 351-3217 (6311 283-6514 Islip Town Receiver of Taxes Southold Town Reccfvcr of'Taxes 40 Nassau Avenue 53095 Main Street Islip, N.Y. 1 1751 Southold. N.Y. 11971 (631) 224-5580 (631) 765-1803 Sincerely. /• ��'�G/tom Edward P. Romaine Suffolk C.:ounl.y Clerk cl� 2/99 Sunda Sundard N.Y.B.T U.Farm Sn02 Bw3ain eDd Sale Deed with Cowan j&dmt C—tt e:Atts-Ldividual or C xporazi•n(Simile Sh et) CONSULT YOUR I AWYER BEFORE SIGNING THMS INSTRUAtFM=rFLS IISSTRUtiT6Arr SHOUIJ->BBE USED BY[..WylatS ONLY THIS INDENTURE, made the ` day of �;�&4'5 - 2001, BETWEEN-Peter J. DiMaggio,residing at 390 Rose Street,Massapequa Park,New York, party of the first part,and Southold Free Library,P.O. B X 697,Southold,New York, party of the second part, WITNESSETH,that the party ofthe first part,in consideration often dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part,does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot,piece or parceJ of land, %%ith the building and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being "Schedule "A "Attached Hereto" Tax Map Designation Being and intended to be the same premises conveyed to the parties of the first part herein by deed dated July 16, 1997, recorded October 28, 1997 in Libor 11859 cp 24W Dist 1000 Said premises known as 53745 Main Street,Southold,Nc%v York. Sec. 061.00 Blk.01.00 Lot(s)015. TOGETHER with all right,title and interest, if any,of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof,TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises;TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the parry of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any sway whatever,except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part,in compliance:with Section 13 of the Lien Law,covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The.word"party"shall be construed as if it read"parties"whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the party oftee first part has duty executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: Peter J. * Maggio STATE '4OF NFW;IORK,�j O� UNTY OF l�—SS: STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF SS: ` On the a day of Kq{/Srn the year 2001 before On the day of in the year before me,the under-iigned pe onalh,appeared Peter J.DiMagrlo me,the undersigned,personally appeared Personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s)whose name(.,)is satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s)whose name(s) (are)subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged is(an)subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shchhey executed the same in his/her/their to me that he/sh✓they executed the saute in his/her/their capacity(ies),and that by his/her/their signnture(s)on the eapacity(des,),and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument,the individual(s),or the'rsou n lx:half of instrument,the individual(s),or the person upon behalf of which the dividual( a d,exec red instr=en which the individual(s)acted,executed the instrument. Signature and Office of i vidual taking Signature and Office of individual taking acknowledgment a6mowledgncnt ROBERT M.STEINERT NOTARY PUBLIC.State of New York No.30-9173300,Nassau County Torm Expires.)tAY;t,V0M STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF SS: STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 199 ,before On the day of 199 ,before me personally came me personally came to me known.who,being by me duly s%vorn,did to me known who,being by me duly sworn,did depose and say that he resides at depose and say that he resides at LhAt hti is the that he is:the of of ,the corporation described ,the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument that in and which executed the foregoing instrument,that he knows the seal of said corporation,that the seal he knows the seal of said corporation;that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal;that affixed to said instrtiruent is such corporate seal;that it wms so affixed by order of the board of directors of it was so affrxetl by txder of the board of directors of said corporation,and that he signed h name by the said corporation,and that he signet It name by the like order. like order. Notary Public NoUi y Public BARGAIN AND SALE]DEED SECTION: 061.00 wrTH covENA�Yr AGAINST CRA-N-MR'S ACTS BL,OCIC:01.00 myr(S):015.001 COU.'TIY OR TOWN.-SUFFOLK COUNTY TITLIE NO. S-]RFET ADDHb--4S:53745 MAIN S*ivELT, SOV17 FOLD,NEW YORK PETER J.DIMAGGIO, TO: SOUTHOLD FREE LIBRARY return bs mail to: RUDOLPH H BRUER,ESQ. P.O. Box 1466,55000 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Pr..ACE FOR 7JSE OF RF.CORDFNG OyFICF. 4 vr+lt.m'AwIIY�r�Drn W T\y�,,W Tn�c.�h ctdf rho brY.v�.0 .�f r Fidelity National Title Insurance Company of New York TITLB NO.01-3704-34248-SUFF SCHEDULE A-1 (Description) ALL that certain plot. piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York,bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Main Street distant 216.64 feet westerly as measured along the northerly side of Main Street from the corner formed by the intersection of the northerly side of Main Street and the westerly side of BeckHhth Avenue: T 1ENCE South 61 degrees 00 minutes West, along the northerly side of Main Street, 43.10 feet to land of Southold Library; THENCE North 27 degrees 47 minutes 10 seconds West, along last mentioned land, 298.30 feet to land now or formerly of Schott; THENCE North 62 degrees 12 minutes East,along last mentioned land,57.23 feet to land now or formerly of Pylko; THENCE South 31 degrees 15 minutes East,along last mentioned land, 144.65 feet to land now or formerly of Edson; THENCE along land now or formerly of Edson the following 2 courses and distances: 1. South 62 degrees 10 minutes West,23.0 feet; 2. South 27 degrees 50 minutes East, 153.00 feet to the northerly side of Main Street,the point or place of BEGINNING. RECCORE 0 2LI01 S-eo 06 10:28;29 RN Edward P-Ro;.:aine LE,K uF UFFOU COWT'd L D00012140 P O±F DT# 01-05085 THE POLICY TO BE ISSUL•D under thL commitment will insure the title to such huildingv and improvements on the pramises%'hich by lawn constitute real property. FOR CONY'EYANCING ONLY: Together with all the right, title and interest of the park,of the first part,of in and to the land lying in the street in front of and adjoining said premises. SCNEDUT CA-1(Description) 1111I I I I Ifil IIIiI II I I I I II II Ill!I I I I I!I I I I111 I I IIIIII IIIII!IIII IIII IIII SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: DEED Recorded: 04/21/2014 Number of Pages : 5 At: 02 :28:11 PM Receipt Number : 14-0051003 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 13-24060 LIBER: D00012771 PAGE : 279 District: Section: Block: Lot: 1000 061 . 00 01 .00 015.004 EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS Deed Amount: $0 . 00 Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument Exempt Exempt Page/Filing $25 . 00 NO Handling $20.00 NO COE $5.00 NO NYS SRCHG $15.00 NO EA-CTY $5 . 00 NO EA-STATE $250 .00 NO TP-584 $5 . 00 NO Notation $0.00 NO Cert.Copies $6 .25 NO RPT $60.00 NO Transfer tax $0 . 00 NO Comm.Pres $0.00 NO Fees Paid $391 .25 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 13-24060 THIS PAGE IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT THIS IS NOT A BILL JUDITH A. PASCALE County Clerk, Suffolk County ao RECORDED Number of pages 2014 Apr 21 02:28:11 PM JUDITH A. PASCALE CLERK OF OUNTY This document will be public SIJFFOLK L D00rj1277112771 record.Please remove all P 279 Social Security Numbers DT# 13-24060 prior to recording. Deed/Mortgage Instrument Deed/Mortgage Tax Stamp Recording/Filing Stamps 3 1 FEES Page/Filing Fee :0- — Mortgage Amt. 1.Basic Tax Handling 20• 00 2. Additional Tax TP-584 Sub Total Spec./Assit. Notation c or EA-52 17(County) s Sub Total SQ Spec./Add. EA-5217(State) - TOT.MTG.TAX �p0 Dual Town Dual County R.P.T.S.A. Held for Appointment Comm.of Ed. S. 00 Transfer Tax Mansion Tax Affidavit 0 Certified Co � -zt The property covered by this mortgage Is or will be improved by a one or two NY5 Surcharge 75. 00 _ family dwelling only. Sub Total �o Z� YES or NO Other Grand Total If NO, see appropriate tax clause on page# of this instrumen pp (� M Z �{ 4 D(s 'o 14009918 1000 06100 0100 015004 9 5 Community Preservation Fund Aix Real Property P T cS �ideration Amount $ _ Tax Agency gency Service Rt AOPR- k�IIIII I II 111�1 UI�IUII I����I�)IIU C PF ax Due $ Verification ---- -- - -- - — Improved 6 Satisfaalons/Discharges/Releases List Property Owners Mailing Address RECORD& RETURN TO: S� Vacant Land �r� r`�� •1 TD L� Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. PO Box 1547 TD Riverhead,NY 1 1901 TD Mail to: Judith A. Pascale, Suffolk County Clerk 7 Title Company Information 310 Center Drive, Riverhead, NY 11901 Co.Name www.suffolkcountyny.gov/clerk Title# 8 Suffolk County Recording & Endorsement Page This page forms part of the attached DEED made by: (SPECIFY TYPE OF INSTRUMENT) Southold Free Library The premises herein is situated in SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK. TO In the TOWN of Southold Southold Free Library In the VILLAGE or HAMLET of Southold BOXES 6 THRU 8 MUST BE TYPED OR PRINTED IN BLACK INK ONLY PRIOR TO RECORDING OR FILING. over IMPORTANT NOTICE If the document you've just recorded is your SATISFACTION OF MORTGAGE, please be aware of the following: If a portion of your monthly mortgage payment included your property taxes,you will now need to contact your local Town Tax Receiver so that you may be billed directly for all future property tax statements. Local property taxes are payable twice a year: on or before January 101h and on or before May 31.. Failure to make payments in a timely fashion could result in a penalty. Please contact your local Town Tax Receiver with any questions regarding property tax payment. Babylon Town Receiver of Taxes Riverhead Town Receiver of Taxes 200 East Sunrise Highway 200 Howell Avenue North Lindenhurst,N.Y. 11757 Riverhead,N.Y. 11901 (631)957-3004 (631)727-3200 Brookhaven Town Receiver of Taxes Shelter Island Town Receiver of Taxes One Independence Hill Shelter Island Town Hall Farmingville,N.Y.11738 Shelter Island,N.Y. 11964 (631)451-9009 (631)749-3338 East Hampton Town Receiver of Taxes Smithtown Town Receiver of Taxes 300 Pantigo Place 99 West Main Street East Hampton,N.Y. 11937 Smithtown,N.Y. 11787 (631)324-2770 (631)360-7610 Huntington Town Receiver of Taxes Southampton Town Receiver of Taxes 100 Main Street 116 Hampton Road Huntington,N.Y. 11743 Southampton,N.Y. 11968 (631)351-3217 (631)283-6514 Islip Town Receiver of Taxes Southold Town Receiver of Taxes 40 Nassau Avenue 53095 Main Street Islip,N.Y. 11751 Southold,N.Y. 11971 (631)224-5580 (631)765-1803 Sincerely, �.�.�. a. 44.t.�� Judith A.Pascale Suffolk County Clerk dw 2/99 1aa1—_ kd NY 005-Bargain and Sale Deed with Covenant against Grantor's Acts Individual or Corporation(Single Sheet)(NYBTU 8002) CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT-THILS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURE,made the 30 day of January in the year 2014 BETWEEN SOUTHOLD FREE LIBRARY with office located at 53705 Main Road (NYS Route 25),Southold,New York 11971 party of the first part,and SOUTHOLD FREE LIBRARY with office located at 53705 Main Road (NYS'Route 25),Southold,New York 11971 party of the second part, WITNESSETH,that the party of the first part,in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part,does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot,piece or parcel of land,with the buildings and improvements thereon erected,situate,lying and being in the SEE SCHEDULE "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF THIS CONVEYANCE INVOLVES A LOT LINE MODIFICATION APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD BY RESOLUTION DATED DECEMBER 16, 2013. ATTACHED HERETO AS SCHEDULE "B" IS A MAP SHOWING THE LOT LINE MODIFICATION. TOGETHER with all right,title and interest,ifany,of the party of the first part of,in and to arty streets and roads abutting the above-described premises to the center lines thereof;TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises;TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been incumbered in any way whatever,except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part,in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law,covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word"party"shall be construed as if it read"parties"whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: SDIWT41OLD FREE LIBRARY USEACKNOWLEDGMENTFORMBELOWW/THINNEWYORXSTATEONLi, USEACK7VOU7XJI-'MENTFORMBELOwwwmLvNEWYORKSTATEONLY.• State of New York,County of SUFFOLK )ss.: State of New York,County of )ss-: On thoSbday of in the year ZN4 On the day of in the year bc.folt me,the undersigned,persdrially appeared before me,the undersigned,personally appeared persona ly own o me or proved to in on the basis of satisfactory personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to De the individual(s)whose name(s)is(are)subscribed to the evidence to be the individual(s)whose name(s)is(are)subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed within instrument and acknowledged to me that hc/she/they executed the same in his/her/their capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their the same in his/her/their capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the inswment, the individual(s), or the pctson upon signature(s) on the instrument, the individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s)acted,executed the instrument. behalf of which the individual(s)acted,executed the instrument. (� DANIELLE GRATHWOHL U otary Publ,c. Stale of New York No.01 GRG208717 Qualified in SuffolklQount Commission Expires 26 ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM FOR USE WITHIN NEW YORK STATE ONLY. ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM FOR USE OUTSIDE NEW YORKSTATE ONLY: (New York Subscribing Witness Acknowledgment Cerrtfrcarel IOut ofSrare or Foreign General Acknowledgment Certificate) State of New York,County of )ss.: ]ss.: (Complete Venae with Sate.Country.Prorince or Murticipaliry) On the day of in the year before me,the undersigned,personally appeared On the day of in the year before me,the undersigned,personally appeared the subscnbing witness to the foregoing instrument, with whcnn I am personally acquainted, who,being by me duly sworn• did depose and personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory say that he/she/they reside(s)in evidence to be the individual(s)whose name(s)is(are)subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helshe/they executed (ifrkeplaceof residence isinrrcity,incltede the street and street number, the same in his/her/theircapacity0es),that by his/her/their signature(s) if ony, thereof);that hetshe/they know(s) on the inswment,the individual(s),or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s)acted,executed the inswment,and that such individual to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing made such appearance before the undersigned in the instrument;that said subscribing witness was present and saw said execute the same; and that said witness at the same time subscribed (Insert the city or other political subdivision and rite state or country or his/herhheir name(s)as a witness thereto. ocher place the acknowledgment was taken). BARGAIN&SALE DEED KTrH COVEN ANTS AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS DISTRICT 1000 TITLE No. SECTION 61 SOUTHOLD FREE LIBRARY BLOCK 01 LOT 14 and 15.1 COUNTY OR TOWN Southold TO SOUTHOLD FREE LIBRARY RECORDED ATREQUESTOF Fidelity National Title Insurance Company RETURN BYMAIL TO FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. 0 INSURANCE COMPANY PO Box 1547 INcoRPORArrn 1918 Riverhead,NY 11901 Fidelity . •,.�' M.ml.er Nn.York Srafe treed tide Ar,ocfarfae W U W O U Z G Q O U W Q W O W fA R W� U Q d Vl La W 2 W rn W Q SCHEDULE "A" DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP I# 1000-61-01 P/O 14& 15.1 ALL THAT CERTAIN PLOT, PIECE,OR PARCEL OF LAND WITH BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON ERECTED SITUATE, LYING AND BEING AT SOUTHOLD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK,AND STATE OF NEW YORK, MORE PARTICULARLY BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGUFNINO AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF TRAVELER STREET DISTANT 228.97 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY FROM THE CORNER FORMED BY THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF TRAVELER STREET AND THE WESTERLY SIDE OF BECKWITH AVENUE, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LANDS FORMERLY OF DANIEL J.KENNEAI.LY,NOW OF SOUTHOLD FREE LIBRARY; RUNNIFG THENCE ALONG LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OF SOUTHOLD FREE L BRAIKY SOUTH 27 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 149.22 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 44 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 32.83 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE STILL ALONG LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OF SOUTHOLD FREE LIBRARY NORTH 62 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 31 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT AND THE NORTHERLY-LINE OF OTHER LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OF SOUTHOLD FREE LBRARY; THENCE SOUTH 62 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 00 SECONDS VILEST A DISTANCE OF 57.23 FEET TO A POINT AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY CAHOON MEMORIAL LIBRARY; THENCE NORTH 27 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 09 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 204.73 FEET TO A POINT AND THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF TRAVELER STREET; THENCE NORTH 59 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST ANCE OF 16.30 FEET TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING. OF NEW O, MET2c�'P LAN SCHEDULE "B" N SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. 1000�1-0]—II, 1f 1 & 15.2 SCALL 1—,30' r, NOWW90v 14 2012 ��•f.d A6., TC. `�� 1 ra ys�eor Lw r- a s 9 Z0.Oa' � of Or v W e ~ .00 q w e. t J. R� � / 4 0 Z i 0 e �r& Cl T e e 4, 1000-01-01-14 AREA-35,M SO.FT. - �••'' �(� t���Of f W 1000-M-01-15.1 AREA-24,492 SO.FT. 1000-0-01-152 AREA-15,497 SO.FT. LLlA9ti: ANYALIERAMN M AMMIN M rA"-'WWY LS A MDLAROV cc or Sw ;20"1Nf NEW VWK turf farcAraN LAw. (6J7) 0 5-1797 fACO'r AS PE W A SEC11 7209-SLWK9GN 2 ALL OF)WMICA TWiS UNDOtCROUND UTILITY LOCATION APPROXIMATE KMQv AAW YA X f w raT mA AND C>:W6 ft [ C� r r P.O. 00X SLID 1lAP d COP[-5&CAR AW 4OWSSM SrA 00'PL 9AfK(W •-MONUMENT 12JO rRAYE'Lf AND LOCATED BY OTHERS. WCMF-'XNARAW AA'PE.V"MCWM •PIPE SOUTHOLD. N.Y. 1197! 12-25� OFFICE LOCATION: �O\'J�S�3Ff `OG MAILING ADDRESS Town Hall Annex P.O.Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 c3' Southold,NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd.&Youngs Ave.) .0 ,?; Telephone: 631-765-1938 Southold,NY Oy • �'� www.southoldtownny.gov �►o! � Sao PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: March 30, 2026 Re: Check Please deposit the attached check into B691: Deferred Revenue. Fee is for a Site Plan Application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Applicant/Project Name &Type Tax Map # Amount Check Date/No. Southold Free Library Parking Site 61.-1-15.2 & $750.00 3/30/26 - #1356 Plan 15.5 Salty Roots LTD CEW Att. Presubmission Materials FORM NO. 3 ?)c MC INWIERED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAR 0 (i 7026 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. FILAPI'VNG 80ARZ) NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: March 6, 2026 TO: Southold Free Library PO BOX 697 Southold,NY, 11971 Please take notice that your application dated December 26, 2025: For permit to: mer gg two_�adjacent lots at: Location of property: 53745 Rte. 25. Southold& 690 '"rravelers St.. Southold.NY 11971 County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 61 Block I Lot 15.2 and County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 61 Block I Lot 15.5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposal to merge tax ma p # 1000-61.4-15.2 to the western adjacent lot tax_ma # 1000-61.4-15.5 is not permitted without the approval of the Southold Tq3ypjP1annipg Board. The proposed in thelIB district. You may now apply to the Planning Board directly. Al)-rivedSignature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Department I Area= Note: ALL SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES; UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION on sr JM clr��r JM �{ WATER SUPPLY, SANITARY SYSTEMS, TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF 55 849 sq.l{.. DRAINAGE, DRYWELLS AND UTILITIES, SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE 00 FU ME APRIL 2024 � SHOWN ARE FRCM FIELD OBSERVATIONS EDUCATION LAW. AND OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING AL OR 1 .28 acres EMBOSSED SEAL STHE LAND HALL INOT DBEECONSIDERED 24\MAIN ROAD THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHTS OF WAY AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD IF TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. GUARANTEES INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY Datum NAVD 1988 IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI- TUTION. GUARANTEES ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE. 01 00 2 -iq TON O V I SIV 00 log ►" 10.1 �, o,� 3\\hq Q f 3A01� 3335\ \1 3qD\ °630.1g y3a5y G9b` 111 `'\\\1\ \1 11 S� \ \ Q osGb°\\Q°v °J� 33364 ° ye+bt\ 3"f osQbOmec\ �� 3y0.y �3y\1 � \ 30.3\ �\ 3113 \\ \\ \\\ \ � • 3 \I33g0 1\\Jr\\ \Opp•6\.0\.\ \\ \\\ gh61 O ♦ O♦♦ CP. V* � '�O• *,Is, gip\ tiy`�6� tih\1 ,1y6\ 1y66 !r 36a5 33y33 3560.1 y34 \\\ ! '�. I 11 \\ \ \\ \I \\� +1y3 1yy4 ,/6-27 _ L3h� 3yA9p + \\ \�� `\ \\ \`\ \ \�-I1/6�� - osQbo\\ //�1 i /�9�Za�ti1 [��y16 tiyg5 1y Gp� • e \ \t\ \ / 4 \ i i i y63 + 3yg6 3h �3ylh \ \ \\\ 1616 // I W 3y\1 ga 3y\1 3h\6 \ h N � .5q• �' 3y�p 0. ( 34 44'�` \�11\' 30.0.\ � y6 �4\ \\\ T �1y5g \tt \ 3y3g 3y1y 3yti\ 3 1 � 3A5g � 1 �• q10 1b\ \ \ \ � \ \ 3yp0. 3h13 \\ y pip. 34 `O\ - '` / fib\ \ \ \ \�� bpG 3y5g1 3hR19 5`9° \ cA 1pl O\ aeQ-Leo\ y63 `' 3' 3q ,\ 36 y 1 33y�\ i\ \ Y,\ \\ �3p5y 3q9 R 0, 3 ati 3 �y S��y3 3 0 ��p r \ 3yo` �a h 35R1h 1` 0. \\\ l V* o •�°y `\ yA\ \\ \\\\ \\ �1 t� 414 \ t ,\, \ 1 \ \ \ Q 3 Jos / C� VA 90 33\\ \\ \\ y64 s\oie \ \ \\ \\ 1 30.S 3 3b / ! \ \ 6 yhy \ \ 50 3Ns\ Y. 30.�11°ce TO --34-,.5� \ \ � �� \ \ \ \6 � d �Q°Goes " 3520\ b3 30.1\ 0.h1 �30.36 .,�q c°� 3350 0 34. 3b'1 30. y1 3 / s\ooe y3p1 `0\ 2 3yh1 g10. 33e6\ �1g0. IL I, 3�S0. 1 3h0\ / 3j301 33 60 Al .o \\`�\ 2 33.0. \� 3 t3 \�\\\ \ \G0.6 O p y \ ` N 1 b\\ \\15e1 13 ✓ I 336g \ N 1 I 1 \\ 16 0.h\ I coc � • 1y:5 \ \ � \b ,31 \ 1h. e 63 �O ♦♦ 1p 3y56 0.�y6 � 3g3 � �` \ `` \�`5 � 1h -F 6 /� • O A 30.93 oN h3�g 3 / 33a6 3311 �\ yb+ �O♦O v- 13 /1R' 3 116 \ 15 / °spin \0G n\ \P\ea h\ h10 1 3 ln1\�/ 339� �� \1 \ 3apq 33g1 g11 1y 10 34, d \\ 1 66 1h61 O" \Q\� ao b,�p�s 33ag� 3 2\5 0 oc �'� ��abg \\� 1y� � � � 1 36\h e �`�. O� \v 0 3 I Q �1 bo°s gb l 33' 0o cam" y\3 .yy 4r \ \ \ 10 \ \ 0.6 30. 33Aa\6 � �-{ •� h9 \y\43yyy7 36 3301 \ \O\ \ Q�1y3g h33 \\g Co 333E9 s�° �� �11 36 �'96 331g\,b\\ \ s� \ v� \ 38 M \ V. \ \ w\oho q 1 bt° too\ og 7 �p5 '\b\\\ �yg •O �\ '� O \ ,�hti355 ' IsOVA X N 33. Q e r 3•• 1g�° .y4,Kl ,� 31 36• 31. ,typ6 �ii1 0. aio 3 6/ ' \3� G9b` 3 / 1Aj tiy1\ '` QDG `'�� 333g6 t 331 1p 3311 O••'•., • •• f/ 3\3\O 0 3i551 ILh / r-d Oj \ 3j366 3gg3h O eQs•` bras \� w,AD► �,�( .Lc�i 33owl 5 04 g � p1 atp`° a y3 �,A Q 320.6 3381 3q1 33c0t`c' q36 � 3\L536 '�, k 0 r.O j �1490. 10.�p \ b \\s �q1h ` yy 341� � e\e 33p16 3p� "bi \g / 3 �0 336q 15 03 O 3 N atoo/ \j0 / tiNil q61 f 31 r, O wo\\ �6 gba �60 iy5\ %AA\tas 1 331y\ \ 33 3136 �. 0� 49 h31 31 , P9_ . 331p atop pp\topcp0 j111 60. s\ V \ 1h 1h\0 1 F Ayb 10.\e 10.\1 l� 3141 ��� 10 36 j1 'o�`$ 1y5\ N 1 1 c0t�e 3366133\y1 0 hyy 6 3 p3 atop/5ti 31- l / c� ON* � 0 1316 ,�V 3 33 3p 3 3y5 /33' 1g0/3 / 10.g4 ,� 13 v o �w pF \ 1���'1 V 3'l 'S3• 39• 3 36• ^y"� ♦ � cps ti0. oQt \�ps36 3 Op g1 � 3356 G°b`� tn°sOoN ��1' 16 6\ � � ppppte\e� 13gh 6 JO hgeQs 335 i \e 311h �� 3\58 1 ti' ° 10.a erie0 q4 3160. 3)66 �3�0-33'•p\\ 31yp i / �16 1 N 10.1y0 •pG �' 1h9g 1y36 ' 9 �r 6h /� j1ti11 �3ti� V \ �p�j� poN 1hBp t�eoQtOo 1\ 1�001 �� 20 1g51 6 i/ G9b\� mo�� // •y06\ fib\ C0�' 1�ag0 D0 0. �3 �9 3pB� 1y10.\ 5h '�• � '�• 11p1 15• 31.- 16s61 �•G O o0� \K �+ 5�9p 'ly 1 J• ♦O OF IN 1gb1,` 1b\\ ti163 11`� bid 1�p 1 00 >k' � v ,'�, > Of16\6 �, �. � o\�N 16• �1661 �� Wit 7, ii 8 Topographic �.11g1 Survey of Property situate ct Southold * LAND SURVEYING Town of Southold V Mintoville@aol.com Suffolk County, New York SUBDIVISIONS TITLE & MORTGAGE SURVEYS Tax Map #1000-61 -01 -15.2 & 15.5 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS SITE PLANS April 25, 2024 Scale 1 "� 20' John Minto, L.S. Jacqueline Marie Minto, L.S. GRAPHIC SCALE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NEW YORK STATE LIC. NO. 49866 NEW YORK STATE LIC. NO. 51085 20 0 10 20 40 80 Phone: (631) 724-4832 P.O. Box 1408 Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. SALTY ROOTS GARDEN&LANDSCAPE DESIGN PO BOX 894 Mattituck, NY 11952 —o— saltyrootsny.com 631 .315.9091 Project 04 � \� Southold Free Library M 3 `�s 53705 & 53745 Main Rd. C J fV ° j 3� EDI Southold, NY co EDI° EDI 3 —.� EDI EDI ' ( ! Garbage Bins t ° y ,O O uu o °`�✓'� 1s'_o v' S + % \ + --� — _ PLAN o o `..-35-- NORTH w w I❑ N ( ❑ TRUE 101-01, p CV NORTH � yto (�1 O d \ ' � t REDI 3 Surveyor: \ ` \ o `4 I y"_ E I w EDI + + JM Lad Surveying PO Box 1408 "\O t M ° L 33 cry 3 Smithtown,NY T ~ DI 3 M 631.724.4832 C Lq p w t v 33 33---------.. Site Data: E) � -32 33 32 SCTM#1000-61-01-15.2& 15.5 33 Zoning- HB DI o ��� a N DI ' " Lot Area- � 27 —26 C+ -7 ...:.: D Y , N 6 P + P o' r '•:r,;ii::'•:;rr:::::c;::;i t:'::':::{t%:::::i:r'` '' >.'. ``!i. '' ''.,: ' ..;f:;`.:.=::`' ',, ' ' :y:<i : .,(,' ;<::>r :;.:'`1.:`>`>r.:. '':;;' P 1'7 3/8"' o0 -..J _::.:.00 .':i ,a;..,a- : . '+... ::`:','''.z: ::':.. ::...; .......::>..,. - _ .. ...•.,., ...,:..,: - > , -., .� t. I --...t' z f-.._7 / 4._...1 — ° .UJ / v 25 ° + +LP +H r . P.. �. —23 23 21-21 o z N O Q o a ca C/� V _� z = O _� � W c C C LL Cn � Q z O — o-> z n o a •� c a o Q Q � a o Q c > c � c N o � Ptt n K r Mo _� Q o o c c o 0 0 R o n` REDI - Relocated Existing Drainage Inlet C N 9 C — Q c6 EDI - Existing Drainage Inlet N � rn This project ro os(es combining two adjacent lots into a single lot and creating a new pocket ark on the a z ' p j p p g 1 9 g p p DI - Drainage Inlet site of the existing parking area at the Southold Free Library. The existing parking will be relocated to the upper library entrance. + LP - Leaching Pool w/ Drainage Inlet Improvements inclulde the construction of an ADA-compliant pathway, new stairs, a new retaining wall, a + HP - High Point stacked stone amphitheater, seating areas, planting and lawn areas, and an activity area with a shade sail. � Wall Light/Path Light Site amenities will include lighting throughout the park, a hose bib, electrical outlets, irrigation and the installation of a new storage shed. + Post Light PERMIT SET project will involve tree removal and site grading, including the relocation of approximately 4,900 cubic - Existing Post Light Thep ! g g g• clean fill/topsoilp to achieve final feet of existing soil ,and the import of approximately 31 ,380 cubic feet of c eaElectric Outlet grades and support the proposed improvements. Drainage inlets and dry wells will be installed to capture Scale I Hose Bib 1 /1 b11 — 1 '0" water runoff. Drafted by: Eric Martz L1 Date: 12.23.25 Sheet 1 of 1 Q2 ONE 00" Lok s,zer 2 Lr 4D INS, -lop 1,7 5�o 5tP4 .JP ro FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY [REM [D SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION FEB 1$ 2026 5_:u i 11 'ID�0N1N Initial Determination 1 4�(0 � Date Sent: ly Date: Project Name: C)oi6 �0� f r_—aff a—a— P5 a J Project Address: -jm D T Zoning District: [4rB Suffolk County Tax Map No.: 1000= �� I "_'I_-_1�— — 100 0 (P Request: —� — — — l�brr I rif C V ' 0n e !�D5o p ortin documentation as to proposed use or uses should (Note. Copy of Building Permit Applicat on and su p g be submitted.) Initial Det ermination as to whether use is permitted: Determination as to whether site plan is required- initial ldin Inspector ������ Signature of g Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: — Date of Comment: P.D. Date Received: Comments._ Signature of Planning Dept. Staff Reviewer Final Determination Date: Qecision: _ Signature of Building Inspector