Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9450 Main Bayview, LLC (2) Glenn Goldsmith,President �Q� S011t Town Hall Annex Nicholas Krupski,Vice President ,`O� 001 0 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Eric Sepenoski l Southold, New York 11971 Liz Gillooly G Q Telephone(631) 765-1892 Joseph Finora �0 Fax(631) 765-6641 �lycoUM`1,� BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 3, 2026 AMP Architecture 10200 Main Road, Unit 3A Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW LLC 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 1000-87-5-22 Dear Mr. Portillo: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, March 18, 2026 regarding the above matter: _WHEREAS, AMP Architecture on behalf of 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW LLC applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland and Shoreline Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated December 24, 2025; and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the LWRP under Policy 6.3 - Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands,- A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction D. Provide adequate buffers between wetlands and adjacent or nearby uses and activities in order to ensure protection of the wetland's character, quality, values, and functions, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on March 18, 2026, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area; and, 2 r WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and, WHEREAS, the proposal of 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW LLC for a permit to construct a 17'x41' (672.7sq.ft. footprint) single-family two-story dwelling with 4'x6' entry steps with landing on 10"x10" concrete piers upon helical piles (20 total) with Azek Break-Away walls; install an I/A OWTS sanitary system at front/side of property; install a 560sq.ft. driveway; install (1) 6'x'4' deep drywell and (1) 6'x5' deep drywell at front and side of property; install (1) 1,000 gallon propane tank buried at front of property; and install underground utilities to dwelling; and, WHEREAS, Chapter 275-3(D)[1] requires a minimum setback of 100' from edge of wetlands for a residence, and the proposed dwelling is within 50'; WHEREAS, there is a kettle hole (pond) located in the middle of the property, the entire property slopes toward the pond, which is an environmentally sensitive area; WHEREAS, the development of a biodiverse, environmentally sensitive parcel with no previous history of development does not comply with Chapter 275-12(A) Adversely affects the wetlands of the Town; (D) Adversely affect natural habitat; and (J) Adversely affect the aesthetic value of the wetland and adjacent areas; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees DENIES the application of 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW LLC for all of the existing structures on the property consisting of a 42.5'x30.5' 1 & 1/2 story dwelling with seaward 16.4'x28' on-grade paver patio, 7.8'x22' front open wood porch with a garage below that has a 69.69sq.ft. concrete driveway with retaining walls for below grade area up to a 1,896sq.ft. asphalt driveway; a 1 & Y2 story, two-car detached garage; a/c unit for dwelling; an 8.1'x31.1' wood-tie curb area; and for 3'x6.4' wood steps in pathway down to 2.6'x9' beach stairs; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by AMP Architecture, received on December 24, 2025; and, This determination should not be considered a determination made for any other Department or Agency, which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Very truly yours, 4�44". Glenn Goldsmith, President Board of Trustees In the Matter of the Application of AMP ARCHITECTURE LLC I 4-11tJ 9450 Main Bayview Road Southold NY 11971 SCTM#: 1000-087.00-05.00-024.000 OO D MAR � C) 203 VAR , 2026 Prepared by: Southold Town Farrell Fritz P.C. Board of TCUSteeS ra` 100 Motor Parkway Suite 300 Id fOWtI Hauppauge,New York 11788 SoUtYIO 631-547-8400 Board of Trustees 0 U� Ras Ra Ras Ra Main QeYvie�y Rd M�hQahlewRry ,a o zo7 AT 9450 Main Bayview Road Southold 11971 B9 `'Rh (. Zoom to View i Tax Map#-1 D00-087.00-05.00-022.000 PARCEL ID 1000087000500022000 ADDRESS 9450 Main Bayview Road CITY Southold ZIPCODE 11971 ACRE CALCULATED 1.23 LAND USE CODE 31 1:VACANT RESIDENTIAL OWNER 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW LLC REPORT AN INCORRECT ADDRESS MAR 18 2026 Location Map Southold Town Board of Trustees r^ � •�� �� .. fir'' �, _� 101Y_ p s `� lip IVT Mo y � 1•. F . ♦.^ � � � 4yt 1 i��� � RA • x�r .M. Yam, ln-,�� •J,� ..s. f Aerial t m • ONSITEPhRIA PTEYIAATTE R 11 , -1 7 M ♦�♦TREATMENT SYSTEM IMARRA NEW RES � DENCE FW PROJECT D�rT?�: � m Y \, ♦� p n o `v) /\� g p ocro5s z.�ao9 to cr .♦ FRO.;£GT/ZONING DATA - EDGE OF..,._,.TER ``r♦\`♦\-/♦♦ �r / , m r JJJ TEST HOLE DATA BY O y- .x ♦� I000-H-I-05-22 p BOUNDARY A9 DELIENATED BY U ' TAX MAP• MLDONALD 6EOSCIENCE EN-GOOCTOBER INC.ON ' ♦\♦\?♦``` , ♦\ \ =ONINS DISTRICT AO NON-CONFORMING W OGTOBER BI,COOS ♦ .L \l LIMITS�IGLEARIN6, / , g� ♦ \NS AND ,� PROP.STOLE ♦\ PROPOSED EVW® LOT AREA 1.2 ACRF5 EL•DB, Q J O ///� ) �pRpp O' DARK BROHN SILTY Z O)co DISTURBANCE / 6.�/ �✓� tqR\`• Pa�O PAVERS VARIANCE APPROVAL PENDING 1O OL LOAM Y ...1 / \ I FEMA FLOOD TONE X ROWV Nf. B SILT Z>: T ap / WETLANDS DISTRICT PENDING fV //,�]�� / PROPOSED /� M-4J' SS' SP PALE B iIIm s C LL W ♦.-. 0/ �DNELLINS,PORGi / `'P TO MrDR415A1✓D .'.'-'. _ _ � h D� DEC DISTRICT PENDING — n=N / `. IPA'Fo SEE PACE - h BRGND YNTIR 45' a•D]' D-4-FOR DETAILS / O SUFFOLK COUNTY HD APPROVAL PENDINS 5 BEDROOM g O IN PALE /'.-.'I•/. .':-.-.-. ``� A / PROPOSED HABITABLE SPACE `'� EaOVN FINE TO •./ :':': -. -...� •\ MEDIVM SAIlD W -� FIRST FLOOR AREA I)IS SF. Er l , _ 1 DYlj -FRESF6NATER-. -'�'...-. STONE". SECOND FLOOR AREA 650 5F. ILO' W J � .- ".•.•.•. PATIO •- -.. l:-•• .•-•••• �` PAVERS D'♦1 / TOTAL BEDROOM COUNT REV.I .-.�.'. _ \ Ipy1j .y OC. PROP.ORAVO. Ir .� ryh t DRIVEWAY AID LOT COVERAGE Q !. V/•-•-•'•' •t#aE OF FRL-SHWATER•• \ ' / PARKINS FL 14O' BOUNDARY AS DELIENATED. .'. - \x 9p �' / DESCRIPTION(FOOTPRINT) AREA %LOT I•---•---•-•----- U COVERAGE -'.'.-.'.-. BY 5HA-N M.BROWN M5..'.'.' ; ON J1LY Ob,20CI /00 TOTAL LOT AREA 53$99.4 SF. _ , d �h '.,FREE TER '. t1 /"6 /. PROPOSED RESIDENCE IJIS.O S.F. 2.1% r . / Y PROP05m COVERED POROV� 225A 5F. 0.4% \ / . . - . - -..•--.- -. 1/ ADS' / - J TOTAL AREA OF ALL STRU=RES 1340D S.F. 25% I i \"•�•— .• •" 11 / LIMITS OF SRADINS AND INS, MAXIMJM LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED-20% Y SRCuw / I DISTURBANCE ✓/ REQUIRED SETBACKS-MAIN BUILDING -•4�� '��'�� mil__—.____---- n REWIRED PROPOSED Cot-n-IE5 BURIED PROPANE TANK SECTION < 'Flagg FRONT YARD SOD' 30.0' NO SCALE.I/4' y / / SIDE YARD 20.0' 20.0' YES RE\ / I 4 BOTH SIDE YARDS 40A YES 91.1' Y W w a Q / 5 REAR YARD bOA' sSaD' YES (FROM REAR YA 0 YETRDLANDS) 75.0' 53.5' 1 WA o�ooF / AO ON�p6 NEK(W GRADE TO REMAIN LEVEL FOR 5'-0•IN PLL ¢o Q p w / \ n O(t� U t DIRECTIONS FROM I/A OWiS.I.5 MAK SLOPE DNELLINS N.LOVED OUTRIDE OF THIS PERIMETER \ / •t'�2' U„" FF.EL.146' Pi ¢�¢¢�+/ _ / PFOP.6PADE EL I'4'WN BRADS •I/A OW5.13D' •MAK K •� 4'f10U9E f• li.•PROP. MAIN DR/NN DraLn+B.Iaa' _ INV.e_ /.asDRPrILN� NSW .y' _ LIDS' TREiGIFS•I]3' .il I ED6E OF FRESHWATER / \` % a / BOUNDARY AS DELIENATED AlL BY INFILIMTOR ^ O BY 5HAWN M.BROWN'MS. �� y%Sr^; INJ.EL E DETAI u'T INJ.a PROJECT: / ON JULY Ob,COCI / /. MARRA vY NEW RESIDENCE . / b'•C'],ro R 245 NITRO NRtDII1G"O SYSTEM R� / �.6* HIGiE9T ETE a 6R0.4ID WATER FI R .•49'_.--___________________________________ PROPOSE OWTS GROSS SECTION 9 SOUTHOLD NYY.1MI D D IA I'-0• } DRAWING TITLE: / / �' T+'rLJ - ; 4 I1 'a.p,-Ii�' „` C •"s d /�,�y�' r PROJECT LOCATION&SCOPE qB T / 1�`. +•y c ht `'r�,,+A� { ,( ,y.,�� T; Y 1 p. �q e.+�� SITE PLAN&ZONING DATA 1 '..�''•3'c'•.,2. �''Ca t� .q � ,fir?' /`dr; f t5'. 1' Y(1 �A'ii! � � 'W(�. .:� e PAGE: T. ri V—oo 1.00 \♦\ / ® .�e� �` !1 t„ 1 { ':A L� IJ L� / n��r @ �5•• itH"� J+�'}( '�'!,l'�•, rM+ i :j. ♦\ / slTE urour NOTES :7 / L"IS 15 AN ARCHITECTS SITE PLAN 1 19 y1 I• �k T Y r4 Y ' •, F � °1`t y , ro t _� 1 OF 1 SNS.IEECT TO VERIFIOATION BY A LICENSED V r ^ +y�q�+ " � �'+ ' / SURVEYOR D O INFORMATION SITE ',A�■• REPRESENT®ON THIS SITE PLAN 15 TO II rI<p L:. T to d �y/ j yuf y' �. II o ♦\ ARCHITECTS BEST OF KNONCED6_. 1 1 � y � (t�ej`'yy1 i. 1•° `R � IJ LII u.... ;� l t ttl 'r'}` :.✓�-/:,. :.' Jet .�. "� .. 6 ♦\ / , MAR 1 8 2026 2.SLRVEY INFORMATION WAS OBTAItLD i..t-'i YTy -4 - g'j .¢(a Y .{ jy •i W '�I/ 90 / FROMASN2VtY DATED NOVEHE3ER ID' / tr. .4:t G, ys. ;X„E� 4' f O 'fix.. r� Y ��(�.^'e .T #� �( ''a•f ITY ran�� .1%f FJ�Pin i.tm I ♦\ COCI AND PREPARED BY. .I_i' '( L- ;'.I.O:1.-n :^,;O , ,. W '�y,f P .A�i :4'' A .PDnt• iii y S'• F), "TH, ""f' "&^A. 44 f •6�1 ^E•i P tF Ji� --�...._.. _ : 4 S4�o� ) ♦ �rj' f1' /.h0tP SCALICM LAND SURVEYING R b• y / ae ins 'a.S \♦ . .. JASON D.LEADINSHAM ...,� �'# "I 1�. -M`.�,�' .S 4 :. W_.. ,f' iY/`r f',vj I 'd 4 t�♦.K • iG /i C � �y TIIEPHONE.(bsl)951-3400 Ti T' �� •�` �� '✓" �_ h 2 k 1�.N Y '� lt"y� Y I I Southold Town � �'"•;�k � � o s� Board of Trustees x{ r 1, x '° W 1 PROPOSED 51TE PLAN LOCATION MAP o SOUTHOLD TOWN TAX MAP • SCALE,I°=20'-0' SCALE.NT5 SCALE,NITS a S Yi o 4�a co aPt npeas¢ vaawrm — — — — — — — — �n+E+r�'w / \ O O� ' \ YS i� Z€330 E�o \ Own 7d F '100/ is �o0.'7faod g�m � `� \\ � � ♦ moz�� I3 ♦ ♦ ♦ � I E IN ____-=___________=____-__-___-: mmums,FoRefff9 . . . . . ~ , -_=-====-===_--=-_--_--=__- '/ MAR 1 8 2026 ., A� ___ _________________ —_-______--- \ t Southold Town K " PILL,ML TO=vap ``, - — °N, / - Board of Trustees FROM BNP., _2a00 _-- __ ----- GlBIG FgaT , `` ---------- ------ ------ -------___— -----__— ,t F( 6 1 . : , . % . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . _-_== __===__=_==== =__=_==__-_____= D E C 1 5 o BOIf%W'X 9 CaONK : . -____-_____--__________--= 2021 . . . , . . . ON.IA.Y O6;7Pl1 . . . . . . ---- ------'-/ ______/�� � � 7 ram.. W T-1 ; . . : . . . \�----------_.----- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % Boa rd of �iLtSipF . _ a` z LU SITE LAYOUT NOTES. . . . . : ; . . ; : . . ; . ' ' . . . . : . . . . : ; . . . . . . . . ; . . : . : • ' : . I. THIS IS AN ARCHITECT'S SITE PLAN 8 ISa ` " " • " • " • , " " • ' ' SUBJECT TO VERIPICATION BY A LICENSED `0' �= �_ -` • p • ; . ; , ; . : : ; . : : ; . . : : , . ; . . ; , . , ; . . . . . . ; . . ; . : : . . : SURVEYOR. THE INFORMATION /4�' t !�;.• `, • • ' • ' • ' • ' ' , ' ' ' • ' • ' • , • ' ' �' / swoie�euan aurm REPRESENTED ON THIS SITE PLAN Is TO THE ? rN "°' ,W `�` a • `- • , , ' . , . ' ' . . • / cISTI +ee �$ ARCHITECTS BEST OF KNOWLI=DCZ. . 2.SURVEY INFORMATION NUS OBTAINED FROM A SURVEY DATED NOVETDER 18, ti �.I, d`p a a� LO / 2021 AND PREPARED BY, y cm PROPOSED PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALICE LAND SURVEYING �'°`,.\"6 _ tr%`�n'n Q JASON D.LEADINGHAM ®� �,•�`' TELEPHONE, (631)457-2400 SCALE, I" c W-O" Y'� 1''S :rf Q _ - ZONINS DISTRICT AC, NON-CONFORMIN6 Us; agmWo INS REGUIRED PROPOSED COMPLIES is A?V Elio FRONT YARO 50.01 NO fall 5-H11 SIDE YARD 20.01 20.0' YES 00100=10H slim SYSTEM REAR YARD DAUM PROFANE FROPOSW TAW PROPOSED REV.I COVERASE PROPOSED COVMRED PATIO, PROPOSED RESIDENCE 1,115.0 S.F. ST4=e BALC4W TOTAL AREA or-ALL STRUCTURES 1340.0 S.F. 2.5% SRAVM- ' BASEMENT -4k Southold Town Board of Trustees � . . . . . . ` . . . ~ . ^ . . . WAYK MA . ---��Y06,2as~ ^ ~ . . . . . . ^ ~ . . . . . . ^ . . ^ . ` ' . . . ~ . ^ ^ . . . . . ~ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ~ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ~ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ \ ' Board of Trus!Lces - . . ~ . ^ ^ ^ ^ ' . . . . ^ . . . . . . . . . ^ " / ~ ^ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ \ / . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ^ ^ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �� . . . . . ^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � ^� . . . ^ ~ . . ^ . ~ . . ~ ^ . . ^ . . . . . ~ . . . \ ~ ~ ^ SITE LAYOUT NOTES, ^ ~ ^ ^ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ' � U UMITS Op I. THIS 15 AN ARCHITECTS SITE PLAN 4 IS 09 , , , , , , ^ , . , , , ' , ^ ^ , v ��@��� ~ ^ ~ ^ ^ ~ SURVEYOR. THE INFORMATION 2: ^ ~ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ �-~ \ � CL --- �� \ REPRESENTEV ON THIS SITE PLAN 19 TO THE am PLAX HAYCA Mr. lie ARCHITECTS BEST OF KNOWLE170E. 2021 AND PREPARED 5y, ffl PROPOSED PARTIAL SITE PLAN \ � � SCALE: � — - — PRoj . f 2axlt�s t crr covR a uM re o _ it a u CLEAwARI S,&RADINs TAX MAP it y 3 x ANDLVZOLINe 1000-8-1-05-22 %LOT 4 a F 3 DESCRIPTION(FOOTPRINT) AREA COVERAGE 4' a ZONING DISTRICT AG NON-CONFORMING E m Wr=9 3 3 / TOTAL LOT AREA 53 Sgq.4 S.F. o 0 3 a g a LOT AREA 1.2 ACRES =w o= a PROP05EP RESIDENCE 1 125.0 S.F. 2.1 w o TOTAL AREA OF ALL STRUCTURES 1125.0 S.F. 2.19. a � a w on z /F�V MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED-20% o i�a p N_ PHOTO 01 a W < w o o�Zmc c^�u PHOTO-2 [Lc?fVl �J. TBr'1 2't".'aP yi* a i o Lz ,t a 2 Z=pc9c / \\\ Pesaro 70 \ ,Pp o y y coo iA�� REQUIRED PROPOSED COMPLIESriv o W Q o x F SYSTEM v NE" Wc MATER / le FRONT YARD 50.0' 50.0' NO CONNEWION / �G� ?p=N 0 w O/k- "N SIDE YARD 20.0' 20.0' YESPPO m z o W I�,y� W 2UrO UN // jO EOTH SIDE YARDS 40.0' 513, YES a'a a a= /per, / eQ NEH EIPOIO T �� PROPOSED / \ ccrogsTRI" =oNE REAR YARD 60.0' 358.0' YES dANtTLEVERED / 614, \\// ENTRY STOOP/ ^\ �/ �T— FHoro as - REAR YARD (FROM WETLANDS) 75.0' 61.8' WA 11.4 \ / x PROPOSED R STOR( =- 3 / 51N.SLE PrAMILLY / PROPOF.FDy6�RYAVE / R851DENGE \ so&old Town TEST HOLE � / TOBER 27,�005 • , \ PRDPosED\ woD DECK \ / TEST HOLE DATA BY MCDONALD GEOWIENCE U , HAY BALES t SILT . . . . Do, \ FEHOIN6 TO 0-5 a UtI ONST RRI" \ ,� OONSTRUG71ON0N \ / SILTY RD45, o d DARK cLewmrrSf ADIN6 BROWN AND EPa>NP I.O' OL LOAM v" D197LRHANGE ML BROWN SILT PALE BROWN FINE \ // / EL=4.3' `SP TO MEDIUM SAND`�Uy / &ROUND KATER FwFT , LIAR 1 8 2026 45' 1150"'PARY AS DELIENATED BY SHAM M. Y 06, M21 / MAR 1 P 2026 ON.N.Y Ob,40�I• + , , , , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . \ / a WATER IN PALE , \ �•::. Southold Town . 6P BROWN FINE TO W. 0 r J•±'. MEDIUM SAND U , , , , , , , , , , , , / "' Board u ustees o LLI m 0 Lij J SITE LAYOUT NOTES: Q 1. THIS 15 AN ARCHITECT'S 517E PLAN 8.IS �,w Oa SUB lFGT TO VERIFICATION BY A LIGEN5ED cf p I SURVEYOR. THE INFORMATION � E � � ILL REPRESENTED ON THIS SITE PLAN IS TO THE y —, y . , y I / °LAN MICR W. ]� ARGHITEGT'5 BEST OF KNOWLEDGE. ® cParosm emsaL S srunxe weN ro , I. ® .eoveu,ava:o,n.e� 2.5URVEY INFORMATION WAS OBTAINEL' FROM A SURVEY DATED NOVEMBER 19, ? �• { 2021 AND PREPARED BY: N SCALICE LAND SURVEYING 1 , 00 Q JASON D.LEADINiSHAM v PROP05F-D PARTIAL 51 TE PLAN TELEPHONE: (631)qS-7-2400 SCALE: 1° = 10'-0" 9)� 3�4c3co p a y o a '�1 ',' r"�y,. y�Cv►yGr ".,'r% l".•� _ ;�� i. r4'l;r: +jr i 'P'C}t+ /;:r;,,!`w s :'. /. ';•c. - '• hC, y��!{� y.YV at goal Board O .r PERMIT NO. �� 'k «4' ��>: �.�i.�"r: .. 71�1199 'y r. : ISSUED TO .......M!-;x vvndoe.). Y' + iP �+'• �J' . •�``(— i ?i r A Pursuant to i'': r-.0 ejI cr :::i o`c the Laws of i _ the State of New Yerr•Y, 1-5:3,, and i; iu, 40 i of „ee Laws of the +t State of New York I S,•'; -?:._1 6-, 7:)•rrn Orxlinenco en- tilled "REGULATINGt,i'�►.� T:��: i'4.;r.:? :� C'F OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOW,"I LANDS and the REMOVAL OF S NID ;;w- r•-, a d `�.a t . . ! it f,.i. , 'LRdALS FROM LANDS UNDER TCA4,'.--;' i:. a-,_ rclnnce with the Resolution of The l3cerd adopted of a ine(,'•'in . h-ld on 7/21./99 19 ., and in consi ('-, rv,, 6;, ;;-:.: r.:a o: .... . paid by .k Mary h.irsch ... .................................. k of .. Sou thal�i cz:l subject to the Terms acid C~ondufi^ins i;s}•.(f cn �:r r:.•�� se side hereof, IJ of Southold Town 7ru't;'?s aLl?"loci!^:{ Flip•,} file following: r 1 Wetland Per(-nit t.o c(-insir•, an ,otagoii sl.ory house with wrap =• -.`•. "t around deck & ca,lc:re..c fc-!ndation with readit. that hayhales be f ?`L placed on west side at il[c; pi,c-p„li:-e aril:.c. to wetlands '& on the «� southl, side froq� eclgc,r 'f ':`4t 1ap(j�; �(?�.� - I; �Jjc house at 50' ,line �� y dtl in accordance ti�.t:i i is uet.=s c•c, as presented in the originating anp`ic:t!^R. duilr,k, coast:-. and tl::.[t these haybal r' p' be drawn on survey. IN WITNESS W1 "-�"EOF, Thq s:icd dFoerd of Trustees here- ': ' �r' ' Gese esents to by eeutes its C��rporti.t9 .� :�! t;& li:.,. '•:+, eSie• p be subscribed by r-rw!' +; ,:'t c!in r.�;�1 "-,:'r:i cs cif this date. C? � off-: •. '._• 1 / •r ;,:�' � IV i .Y. :a '• Ks�R^ �••G/ t i`� .• - IIVn � _• ! �� ,�FL1 RK�a+�,rltV t �p '� -� � Orr yh�,�•--:r, r;r„• _ •: {''�• �+y r,:, 'P,• .�Y�:_+`•1., ; LOLV M117 I 1 C, t►r�ti,lj►,.�,1'4 yr� Southold Town Board of Trustees At �� Albert J. Krupski,Preiidcnt Town Hall James King,Vice-Presidccit _ ' 5:149 Blain Road Henry Smith P.O. Pox 1179 Artie Foster :­01.10inld, Nre w York 11971 Ken Poliwoda C TOrphone(516)765-1892 }. Pax i51fi) 765-1823 July 21, 199 1 8 Mary Kirsch (as contract �-�;te�.�a) ;., MAR 2026 P.O. Box 668 ^hh Mattituck NY 11952Southold Twn _7J o ; •• Board•of Trustees Re: SCTM #87-5-24 Dear Ms . Kirsch, The following action was 1=a':'!n by t � P )^rd of Town Trustees during a Regular Meet3 r2:;, Iiel:1 c•7i ii-1 y 21, 1999, regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, MARY KIRSCH to l,he SoLA.hold Town Trustees for a permit under the cif t�'!o irletl.,�nd Ordinance of the Town of Southold, applic-tti.^n c:Cc':F:i ,Tune 29, 1999 and, WHEREAS, said applicafi^;; wa:s re e ,.g=l to the •Southo]d Town Conservation Advisory Cott;icil for tl�r i r findings and recommendations, and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing i•.Ls held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on July 21, 1999, at which time all interested persons were g;.vnn an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premi.srs in question ai,d the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has all the testimony and documentation submittc.l this P F}plication, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standard set forth in Chapter 97-18 of the SouLliol-1 (o:'.o, WHEREAS, the Board has I.hirt!- t1he project as proposed will not affect: the tt4aI�:t; aL,� t y and �jeneral welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trusteoes approves the application of I MARY KIRSCH (as Co"trac-L. a 1,716 octagon 2 story dwelling with i-n-an r---,r.cre'1-e foundation -�t side at the with condition that Z;i i w property line adjacent to oli tPie soutli side from the edge of wetlands lr hou --o =;O ' line during construction, and that thes.m. b':� dra,.,in on survey. Located: 9720 Main Bayvl-.-,-..i PrirL,.:, Sr;U1--11o3.d. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED tli,,t t.his do'--j.iminiti,)n should not be I considered a determirk-atton -iw-,tle if;,r an-, ot.1ber Department or Agency which may also have an pending for the same or similar project. Permit to construct and cciaplcte pr ; ft will expire two Years_y_ from the date it is sign od. F(-,,es must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six riontlis cl tll-e date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the, Ti-ustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. FEES: None: None Very truly yours, MAR I R 2026 Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustee. Southold AJK/d h own i Board of Trustees Cc. DEC Dept. of State Health Dept. U SURVEY OF PROPERTY ° ,Al. �A&� SITUATED AT w, SOUTHOLD I fR01V TOWN OF SOUTHOLD rb' ` SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX . No. 1000-87-05--24y7 �• I SCALE 1"=50' r TLAF II \ APRIL 7 1999 MAY 7, 1999 (REVISED PLOT PLAN) ♦ r II i1 lR i P I ` - JUNE 9, 1999 (REVISED PLOT PLAN) a �t�A IeTI `I I'\• i I Loa AREA = 54,300.93 sq. ft. a bra p0.I 1.247 ac. a a a Je CERTIFIED TO: MARY KIRSCH oft g°9 ' �' ' � •:.}•p�?'�o••.l ��?� TEST HOLE DATA (TEST HOLE DUG BY AfcDON_Al n GEQ5Q ON MARCH 12. 1999) / /�/ //g,P , v IL low MN GaWN 51LTT Law OL � ` y ')1 E ` eAOwN lOU1T 3LT n ,y71.,1T `•` 9.2.-/d Jl3 ewnw saaT•sARo sM � � , `; ��\ �\ D a V' Am ENIOmm rw To CaV6E GIG SN , ,L \\ (/1 a r a 2.6 1.].Z 11�,9•a Il T r ' ea - a A, i. A, TOIL WC9F 2.a. I •I 'sy \o, 2-4 h WATER IN PAE WON TEE TO GEARSE SAM 3W ♦ / i/ / a • i/ IN ♦ s <.It {I ��`?��•�; TOWN 0 SOUTHOLO �' =o'er; / as 1.MrATG1al AIIE ELEVATIONS YE m",n T illY EImm [LLYAa MC 3NaWN Mu Loa PW0193Eo NEYAODIO MC HEDWN TNUM Q ' E'�"as AGG /AA,NW OINVIS.IMINN OM YC n10Y FIELD �( 3.Man=3ERx:31'3TEY 31EMC111m la"mm- A.WZUUN E""O MUN TAW A 1 TO A EE0•0aN NG1S 13 3011.A R 3IMM.AREA. L WE TEOM ED I&W a15NXI.ITIRTEY SNAIL WE ETETCnVW Due Our.DAWN TO A Gx D.,Foal S1 ATA ER ACOVrAIAE SAND AND OMVM M3 A OYYEHII Ml(E)TEET -. anGTEII THAN ra UAaI POOL E./ MG WT OF C3DAVATIOx TO K IlA=UlD 11 ACCUTAGE 30D•oMNEL T.MC EMIR AxTA Of ExCAVAOON 13 m EC WELL MINTED TO AL DW WE EXCAVATION m Dc On,wIGE maVNG THE YNf001M6E Iona 112 % 1d � �• 1, TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL, SYSTEM DmT m EEAIA ,1J � /I ,Km , I i m •z.s Dt I—•—I i•— /p' SEPTIC TANK rll ' //.^�;.`/. ,YO ,irr"Noo�'7"�rri•®m.,E,m,Na,cn,�mua � IWm /// •�_—:) ,i�s�W ui:InA,EI d r w' ,two A AwGI nGEvcrr. //// / A.E•T �.21 . �.wi:aAm o'W nwmnirI'm AV A,EI�r�vwEmr // /,�-. I11 bNA,u.maW¢wLVN IEACNINa Pans l2l U•'—�i SV //////// 1 1\1 LAiW„Y aWPIfA�ItlG1NWYICQ MNLYYAWIWAP. I tPmOWOtD.Y WI IDE A,A.TmmINaAv/En.nTAvu AWA i // // i�w.S' CP�4G9E.1DW'.. 'j�c cuP®EP.La mn m v ti� ///ii�/' / r I 11IA ar �veTmN wwwL WWn�um Gi'AV 11 N TNS IZ���I IS A ERATONOUTON�OFON S'd/• '1r� //4� /�/ / EWCGn 7209 OF THE NEW YORN STATE /•P'// ////•--/ / N LAW. COPIES OF 7HI5 SUi�VEY AL1P NOT a4RING f / / /• // / THE WED SURVEYORS INE SEAL OR // / /•� EAIBOSSEO SEAL SWILL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY / y ONLCERTIFICATIONS TOHEPERSON INDICATED HEREON STIALL RUN IS P P THE AND FOR WHOM THE SURVEY // / IS PREPARED.AND ON HI5 BEHALF 7C THE TRLE COMPANY.COVFANMIENEAL ERN A AND Jp[�BI �, � TO THE LNS NEES OF THE EO ENG INI AND / ��^� /� +'y ,.. TUTION,CEAI67G1i0N5 ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE •_•} / THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHTS OF WAY ,•'�'p AND/0 E_ENENT.OF RECORD,IF `6/A{.^•,'1 j O ANY,NOT SHOWN ARE NOT OUARAMEED. co 0 Q, —0 � PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINMUM C) BY THE U LS� I�A��D Joseph A. Ing®gno BY THE LI USAss.E AND APPROVED O AND ADOPTED P1 VI ) •-IE O �a In To NEW TORN SLATE LAND O Land Surveyor CAI V1Nx O cCD n En o Title Surveys-Subdivisions - 9Ye Plans - ConstruGtlan Layout C= G PHONE (516)727-2090 Fax (516)722-5093 ,qh p.E �Q S lei OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS �''; �✓ OF N.Y S. Lla. N 966 o One Union Square P.O.Box 1931 Aquebogue,New York 11931 Riverhead,New York 11901 —2 4— Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Ashley Itenberg <ashley.itenberg@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2026 3:41 PM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Cc: Krupski, Al; Doherty, Jill; Mealy, Brian; Smith, Anne; Suess, Alexa; Stevens, Kate; Tomaszewski, Michelle; Standish, Lauren; Stype, John Subject: FORMAL OBJECTION: Request for Denial of Wetland Permit (9450 Main Bayview Rd) SCTM #: 1000-87-5-22 To:Southold Town Board of Trustees CC: Newly Elected Trustees and Town Board Members Date: March 16, 2026 Dear Members of the Board of Trustees, I am writing to formally request the permanent denial of the Wetland Permit application for 9450 Main Bayview Road. As this proposal returns to the Town yet again on Wednesday, March 18th at 5:30...I urge the newly seated Board and our returning Trustees to recognize that the fundamental flaws of this site remain unsolvable. 1.Administrative Finality:This case has been repackaged multiple times.The core issue remains: the lot is too small to support a dwelling of this magnitude while respecting the 100-foot wetland buffer. A 50-70% reduction in this protective zone is not a "variance"—it is a total bypass of the Town's environmental safeguards. 2.The "Double-Jeopardy" Impact on the Ecosystem:This property acts as a natural "catch-basin" for sea-level rise and rainwater runoff from the land above. Placing a massive structure here will lead to the "scouring" of the surrounding land and the eventual death of the marsh. No amount of engineering can offset the damage caused by obstructing these natural water paths. 3. Economic and Neighborhood Liability: By allowing development in a known flood path, the Town is sanctioning the displacement of water onto adjacent, law-abiding neighbors.This threatens our property values and the long-term safety of the Main Bayview corridor. 4. Protecting the Wetland over the Footprint: Piers protect the house, but they do nothing to protect the wetland. We respectfully request the Board to prioritize the health of the Peconic Bay watershed over this unsustainable development footprint. We respectfully urge the Board to protect the integrity of Southold's Town Code and the safety of its residents by denying this permit. Sincerely, Ashley& Isaac Itenberg 9325 Main Bayview Rd. Southold, NY 11971 ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 Glenn Goldsmith,Presiuvi, Y���O CpG�a, Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice Presidents < 54375 Route 25 Eric Sepenoski y ? P.O.Box 1179 Liz Gillooly .�y • Ole Southold,NY 11971 Joseph Finoraa 'y Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection Report Date/Time: (� Completed in field by: ffwo( AMP Architecture on behalf of 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW, LLC requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 17'x41' (672.7sq.ft. footprint) single-family two-story dwelling with 4'x6' entry steps with landing on 10"x10" concrete piers upon helical piles (20 total) with Azek Break-Away walls; install an I/A OWTS sanitary system at front/side of property; install a 560sq.ft. driveway; install (1) 6'x'4' deep drywell and (1) 6'x5' deep drywell at front and side of property; install (1) 1,000 gallon propane tank buried at front of property; and install underground utilities to dwelling. Located: 9450 Main Bayview Road, Southold. SCTM# 1000-87-5-22 Tye area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: 9/ Chapt. 275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: +i Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Notice of Hearing card posted on property: 4e_/_yes No Not Applicable Info needed/Modifications/Conditions/Etc.: ekl� l rk&tpovs 0 raj 'g—r ►�tLl! 5 ����n� Present Were: \/ G. Go smith N. K, ru�ski VIE. Sepenoski L. Gillooly �,. Finora i MAIN ROAD fNYS. Rte. e5) ry SURVEY OF PROPERTY SI T UA TE \ NIOIT S O U T H O L D ULLYSSES GALLANOS TOWN OF SOUTHO D 217.82' ;\ SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK •21'50 'E SCE SET 3' S.C. TAX No. 1000-64-01 -30.2 N 84 Pam 2.'N. FOUND O SCALE 1 "=3 0' CONC. MON. 119.19' I \ vv +9E CE POST pp57E1.4'S• I �' 0.5'S. 0.3W 1.0'S. 0.7E I F _ Os SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 _ JULY 29, 2015 STAKE FOR PROPOSED DOCK i� I —•.—• — 1 oRH. RFs MAY 13, 2024 UPDATE SHORELINE I •' LRY POLE •O 11 22A AL \ AREA = 70,093 sq. ft. N I \ (TO TIE LINES) 1.609 4C. I F1J0 �y F NOTES: I AL 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.A.V.D. 1988 DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS: 10.0 I I � I FUG \ I JIL \ I JIL A \ 51 43' ?52 QO� \ — o� SALr 40'15„ oaN r S 827 .42' 0 36 w 3 4 o ATFLAG wQ) 21.32 4 W WOOD 0) O� 4 S DECK AL L4j - -_�QQ��l n J WOOD G„ E ]IIIt STEPS �$ FLAG 5 Og° 7 q p9 N n A24� G�PC0'4 3� AL o Q/ yy I I` k lq AR FLAG I INTERTIDAL MARSH N OF bo AL 1.1 fV 0.2IL 63. In .�, 3 3p / W a 246.47' 3.2 62°39 57 _ o 41 16.07 /^ EDGE OF PAVEME 12. °) cf- AL FLAG ` AG CO FLA 12, „\ L'� ��sry� STw .2 3 11_0 (0') @ xg 3 sT� 136' 4 AL i 1 (Q Off' O ° \ C-3 Y o�� o c) o = Nathan Taft Corwin III UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF STANDARDS FOR TITLE SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE BY THE LIALS. AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED EDUCATION LAW. ELEVATION HIGH WATER MARK 05/13/2024 = 1.6' FOR SUCH THE NEW YORK STATE LAND 3 ELEVATION LOW WATER MARK 05/13/2024 = -1.0' Land Surveyor COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING 3 r' 0F•IV /'''0� THE B S DvwD TRUSHALL C NOT OPY.D SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR WATER DEPTHS BE CONSIDERED LOW WATER BEINGSHOWN A N01N INCHES ARE REFERENCED TO `� ••. i� ELEVATION ALONG WETLAND BOUNDARY 05/13/2024 = 3.2' Co UN Successor To: Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr. L.S. ONLY THE SPERSON O R WHOM TH HEREON E SHALL Joseph A. Ingegno L.S. :?� ' Z: IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND Title Surveys — Subdivisions — Site Plans — Construction Layout -: LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND 0 • TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI- TUTION.(631)727-2090 FOX (631)727-1727 m2 Q TUnON. CERTIFlCATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE. OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS i�'S�O OS �� � • ' •��`�� THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHTS OF WAY 1586 Main Jamesport, New York d11947 Jamesport, NewXYo k 11947 '��//A • IF S ` ANYAND/NOT SHOWN ARE OR EASEMENTS FNOTCGUARANTEED. ��I���f t<< N.Y.S. Lic. No. 50467 33-036C I 0 o° w D w SYMBOL LEGEND ~tea o01 �10�� z��sn 0 MONUMENT FND ��\P (ywz� L,<Wr® I.P. / I.B. FND poAD BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED �� N a ® I.P. / I.B. SET IElf cps ON LIBER 13088 PAGE 0152 W O o a Za w x�0355 SPOT ELEVATIONS BAYV z w v 1� � Z a,a_n UTILITY POLE MAI �+ W jDE) J f ( � Z w GUY WIRE 6 6 O O m o �— UTILITY POLE WAIGHT y. +�°" } \( OS F w w o LIGHT POLEbps '( l!�Gj w Z v SIGN " +^ > >r 4.1 L r,C� o o FIRE HYDRANT .° +. +^'° + ----- ------$Q „—E �, S51 * 00'0 E a 3 0 Z —� PVC FENCE (PVC) ° _--- ----- O o w F S e 2 §�z� ❑ STOCKADE FENCE (STK) +,s + +l Jvo 01) �' w w c' —X— CHAIN LINK FENCE (CLF) ry+° +^� + EDGE- --- �' } FND p�pE 1 00' �► ' N w a Z OF P AVEMENT _ +^ U�� —z— IMRE FENCE q + + 145.00 OpN P� •�"'..• a a a a QD MANHOLE +^^'" s`p +" �-�+ _ ." j 3 "A"-INLET +" + 00 e�0 ,/0 Ej -- map �"��b ,o, +`,� +^ I O Q °a o IG+ �f max "B"-INLET 5 y + O No i....�' '� + a 1 O <o E3 YARD INLET �� MON +. �, �•►� .. +^ I L0 o v=ow> YARD INLET __ �\ +,> 1 ,a d (� Z oo a L F Z A/C UNIT \� + I z w I O� I m° 0, [El ELECTRIC METER �jo , }^ + + z p GAS METER �� O r ( 1 w w f n K t- O ^ } j r L� " o Ln ` 0 WATER METER ^� +°a��\ +' + I Co `/ �o o - GAS VALVE + �p aar IC LOCATN n w ; Z D i LLJ wv WATER VALVE M • — I a X Li vex woea�a� $ 'f +'' a j oho: 1 \ o o n Cv TEST HOLE 1 0 °" o+ + + } + �eauurr tz ww z H s } a +^ /ii.\ i oo er TREE �d5wo u� r, r' ----10-------------- '� a SHRUB +� 1 ' /LP. , ozLI i • BOLLARD " ® WETLAND FLAG + +°' d' w=o D.C. DEPRESSED CURB ` ( o w FE. FENCE lip _�t+ f n MAS. MASONRY ^° +° I\� + `� v J Z o PLAT. PLATFORM °" z rr w W.W. WINDOW WELL + WETLAND + +° e" + \� 1� _ Z G ~woo + oavxiw ----_ FLAG NO. 4 °° �� B/W BAY WINDOW {��, C/E CELLAR ENTRANCE +°� a" +� Q'1 +" I ^°� N J + WETLAND ''� + Z/. O/H OVERHANG FLAG,/NO. 5 ^ WETLAND +"� WETLAND + I �\ zo R/O ROOF OVER i/ FLAG N0. 3 -_FLAG_NO. 1 w L o CANT. CANTILEVER ," ° < <p ``�''�� + G.O.L. GENERALLY ON LINE +° ,T i 1 \\\ +"� o w o ® CROSS CUT + i 1 ` I + E o WETLAND Q I a o V Q o o STAKE `' FLAG NO. 11// O w~ U O/L ON LINE +p'� / 0 �Z°o +°3 °d // +,d + 110, w a o + / WETLAND 4 1 F I � FLAG NO. 7 `\ 1 FLAG NO.D10�//// y ��ti ° .�-4 I Li z O Q� Lu + I F4L ° 0Fr Li D aa � W US 0 WETLAND A WETLAND ++ +° }e I u, m ON FLAG NO. 8 �`. FLAG N0. 9/ 1 o as o a +° 1 TAX LOT 24 a o 3 D 6 N U 0 0 a L FLOOD INFORMATION NOTE: +�� +.� }�� ^� 1 sITORY Z o °n1 + FRAME RESIDENCE ''� „ + +'� (PUBLIC WATER) 1 v=L<affi BY GRAPHIC' PLOTTING ONLY, THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN ZONE X , 1 + I 1 "X*" AND "All" AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, + ,,+ �, �L?3 COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 360813 0166 (MAP NO. 36103CO166H) + +� + +� +,1 NO VI RISCIB3LE WELLS = NO AVAILABLE RGECORD DOCUMENT 3 0 WHICH BEARS AN EFFECTIVE REVISED DATE OF 09/25/2009, AND IS z a IN A SPECIA'�L FLOOD HAZARD AREA. NO FIELD SURVEYING WAS VACANT LOT +o" +"� <m U PERFORMED TO DETERMINE THIS ZONE. bn 8 1 +"R ,� + + + ( C) F r TAX LOT 21.13 +�" +, 1 ^� } + °� +,� 1 0 ° ZONE "X" DENOTES AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% NO VISIBLE WELLS FND PIPE /+�° + +� I O II (n-,z ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN. NO AVAILABLE RECORD DOCUMENT °� ON FL ,y + +° p Ow O 0 ZONE "X*" (DENOTES AREAS OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD; AREAS e" + 4p ,,-ZONE "X*" I N o N a v�i OF 1% ANNIUAL CHANCE FLOOD WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN + +` +' + N l,_1 m o W F 1 FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE AREA LESS THAN 1 SQUARE MILE; AND +-b -' I ZONE "AE (EL.6) ( O J o a F o AREAS PROTECTED BY LEEVES FROM 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD. °� .•� WETLAND _ � + w1 pp ,p + ''WETLAND FLAG NO. 7 I I N P o a ZONE "AE" DENOTES BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED. +' 1 M +" , -'+�"'� FLAG NO. 6 Z O ON 5 w WETLAND AWETLA+ND 1 � z FLAG N0. _ - WETLAND _----�° FLAG No. 5 0- oN FLAG N0. 4 +^ 1 I Q o'^ a—Z °Z wax O 7) w rnl p 1 X O F- ro N U W 00 oz Ld O I Ld 0 z w w + % r \ p 0 0 z cV / p00 TITLE & BOUNDARY NOTES: 'WETLAND 1 O 6 WETLAND FLAG NO. 2 I ( U z z o a FLAG NO. 1 1 1 W z � 5 a QZO 1. CONFLIlCTING MONUMENTATION FOUND IN THE VICINITY VACANT LOT I 0 Ld m J a- OF THI'S PROPERTY AND HISTORICAL DEEDS AND OLD M #9450 o Z SURVEYING RECORDS INDICATE THE POSSIBILITY OF Q VARYING INTERPRETATIONS OF THE PHYSICAL p p� o W W o POSITIONING OF THE LINES OF THIS PROPERTY. TAX LOT 22 I 0 i w w a�tn z Q w w O z0 V)O�-U 0 0 a w J _° }— O ry s w a a: O <Wo LT a o i I N N t� J Y w o W Q O ma � � o o c� � a WETLANDS NOTE: to Li O W Z Z cr, I I 1 (FOR HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) �N0 z � 9 AN AREA OF TIDAL WETLANDS WAS DELINEATED BY SHAWN M. BROWN ' 1 I 00 ry L u O '^m n M.S. ON JULLY 6, 2021 AT THE SOUTH END OF THE PROPERTY, BY j Q g V2 z R WETLANDS FLAGS NUMBERED 1-7 AND A FRESHWATER WETLAND WAS V) }- Z DELINEATED IN THE CENTRAL PART OF THE LOT, BY WETLANDS FLAGS Q w o z o NUMBERED '1-11. N51°23'00"W 115.00 ' �- cn O < 3 � � � � - - _ - - - � m F_ z WN o �— TAX LOT 25 O z O 0=�0 20' R.O.W. 1 .. CQ Kf Z z a I a�a 2 STORY . 0-) 0 0 a wo O�Lj FRAME RESIDENCE Ln w Lo J J m w i a o (PUBLIC WATER) O O �cF,=F N � > 0') 0 0-0 of NO VISIBLE WELLS ( D w Z. <- NO AVAILABLE RECORD DOCUMENT 1 o o w g o GRAPHIC SCALE /r/^� >zw V / oFw'�w 40 0 2D bo COREY CREEK o�0-�w o�aa� 0.0 Q �o -777 xzV w w ou v 0 NOTE: LOT AREA W W3? a ( IN FEET ) NO VISIBLE WELLS WITH IN 150' 53,596.19 S.F. _ 0 z o 1 inch = 40 ft. OF SUBJECT PROPERTY * ALL ELEVATIONS REFER TO NAVD88 DATUM 1.23 AC. T� 0�3 V1 =o`W~ was SITE LAYOUT NOTES: 1. THIS 15 AN ARGHITEGT'5 51TE PLAN d 15 z SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR. THE INFORMATION LIMITS OF CLEARING, z m,w REPRESENTED ON THIS SITE PLAN 15 TO THE o o w GRADING AND GROUND OS Z ARCHITECT'S BEST OF KNOWLEDGE. O-'�� DISTURBANCE 1/� =a 2.�VEY IM A NFORMATION ATED I I�,/18 2021 AND -:1 � � \ PROP. IA ONSITE /r�� �� o Z W PREPARED BY: __; _ PROI� S6 WASTEWATER 0 o; a ni TREATMENT SYSTEM Oop O Z ? } / /� \ \ (5 BEDROOM) F� �� J'w SGALIGE LAND SURVEYING -" V � � \ � w�F m a P:651-95'7-2400 ' -� 00 4p., �� L \ FN w c~i o 3 w \ mW >wwPHOTO > 0 z m-o<w ly) c �1 \\\ \\\\ PHOTO #3 `` #2 WATERBLIG T PHOTO #I I a a z o �P EDGE Cj BOUNDARY AS DELI$'NATED ONNEGTION o LL o W BY EN GO ULTANTQI, INC. ON �\ 3' / �\ \\\\ \\\\ % M/ \ PROP. EN STOOP >Q o 3 GTOB 31, 2005 5' �$p \0 / �. \\\ \\ " N•�y P� W/ 4 X 6 OVE NG o o S N \ \\ \�\ NEW BURIED ELE A`/p. CONNECTION I o w$ X I OI.O' PHOTO #4 I �z a w a o �i / \\ \\\ v \ / ^ vw S Wwk=a PRO D N VEL / �� \v/ BUR 0 //. my // {—PHOTO #5 <Z 3 I D IVE. �/ U I >< \p/� PROPANE /^ /p. /0 o o a wx / \ / / / O I , ` �� \so TANK / /N� '� w= wa 7 ' / Como �WETLANDS ROP. . 6'O185...�.: DWELLING 2 4c� g / QO \ ry0 I. / TEST HOLE ,q m �4 \ 50.0' / �, 3/q / / /Y 75 O' PROPOSED / EXIST. I r,O�o DWELLING / \ olDNELLIN5 \ UJ 0 aJ \ 4i � Q D WETLANDS. F Q � �1 P r0 �� OCT.zi,2005 Scl=r W \O r s ... .. ....... ....................... ..................................... 5o1JTNOLDTOWN GODE'2Do-124 k..".'. - ;" cr, r...: TEST HOLE DATA ��L — n F 1, 2 4 2025 C� °�o - MGDONALD 6EOSGIENGE Z ttl PROP. COMPLIES _ ENLARGED PROPOSED SITE PLAN ,1 a o o ........................................................... ............................................................ ..�' MIN.FRONT YARD 50D' SOD' NO EL 85' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" _-___ ! It m O .............................................................. OL DARK BROWN SILTY � Z =............................................................. _ .......................................................... MIN.SIDE YARD 20A' 20.0' YES LO'- — LOAMDETAIL-' ... _ .;.-r-'.»`_:.:.: _ _.._._ __ �_.,-. _.__ Q ......................................................... �0 LOT IIErAILs /y .' MIN.COMBINED SIDE 40D' 96.1' YE5 •. - .. % .. _-.-.,__._____ -_.... O S/ LOT ° oryQ) YARDS ML BROWN SILT DESCRIPTION aGRIFTtoN AREA O (n Y W to �3.���: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: � MIN.REAR YARD bOA' 9643' YES o :......................................... M� TOTAL LOT AREA 53"�bZ S.F. O Z "J MAXIMIM FEIFAfr(FROM '.AD!SLOPE) 35'- — h�TLANDS 24$76D S.F. 45.9% LL 01 AVG.ERADE) g5D 24.9(FLAT) YES SP PALE BROWN FINE J ........................... ........... ......... ........................... REAR YARD _ fn ................................... hEAR YARD I d :::::::::::::::: 45'-� TO MEDIUM SAND TOTAL LOT AREA REMAINING 29pR.4 S.F. 54.1% !� Q Soo' YES , `� �ARC a ,, - "`.. r xasF: t ,a,.w <�y _„,y...o. .; g � / pROEGT-/ZONIN6'CAT,h �;�-<' r•0's6 � O ....................... ................... cO ds� �O� O/C�G- ............ :SOUTiiG `TONN.GODE 2L0-12{(B) __.,'} ` :: �,/,� TAX MAP. I000-e'1-05-22 // %LOT ZGMNs DISTRICT AG NON CONFORMING �� �• J•. S '4� $ '... DESCRIPTION(FOOTPRINT) AREA ASP/ BROWN FINE O '\ f LOT AREA 12 ACRES Gam'. :✓'` ,r �q` < c TOTAL LOT AREA 53�96Z SF. , , MEDIUM SAND � TOTAL BUILDABLE AREA 3Sr-.9Pf7.4 S , VARIANCE APPROVAL PENDING �► ��� :`}�:. O FEMA FLOOD ZONE Xi}5.."'•' "� + 4 bti N PROPOSM DMELLINS, 6'I2.71 5F. 23% VETLANPS DISTRICT PBIDIN6 PROPOSED ENTRY STEPS AND - +-:-.'-� �• PROPOSED 51 TE PLAN LAVING 42D S.F. O.I% PREVIOUS DESIGN 523'FROM ,a P �y TOTAL AREA OF ALL 57WIC,7URES '114.7I S.F. 23% COMMENTS. 6ROUNDWATER DEG DISTRICT MTLANP5 APP,O APRIL �j%'. .��'3 If!-$`'y 4,> SCALE: I" = 50'-0" ENCOUNTERED 4 B'BELOW �� a a II MAXIMUM LOT GOVERI6E ALLOYED.20% GRADE SUFFOLK COUNTY ND APPROVAL PENDING 1 5 BEDROOM `'a•�. "4 W K GENERAL 5YMB0L KEY: zy w gr EXISnNS TO RB,IAIN 1::= NBN FCODAnON WALL ''mao oow3 NBt MOOD FRAME z~Q �xoc�i oz�S oJ�a w� W"O- Q 2 Yr Z Iz o ��¢ma mwa�¢ F gw S Z p O<=w Q W =aQWx x zo2wx 2�z53 oa�QQNa W K N 3 pw ow-Np u axxzal �, -C N w C}Q SKYLIGHT I 01W3Zz m ry ` _�. FLUSH MOUNT �— J �' LL W p N ' PROP. �.. <Z E SKYLIGHT - - w �QW3« DN 41 BEDROOM DN o g m w w x 139 S.F. w 8 w - m-J1-Y PROP. a: o 'n ROOFTOP DECK - PROP. , —PRE J 488 S.F. ry _ ; BEDROOM L.qI j ' j - n y. o _, — . P Z140 8 S.F. 17UPj . . BATH. _0 S.F. p — 7r� � I +� 6 C) m 2'-O" 3'-3" 4--1 PROPOSED ROOF FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN -6" I'-a" - + SCALE: JW= 1'-0' .__ SCALE: I/W= P-0' C CANTILEVER = Q REAR OF N DWELLING - 5'-10" 52'-6" :Tr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I DEC 24 2025 L I legalwo T�: — L 00000000000�0_ AC UNITS CANTILEVERED m 0L— Bo ar of Tr ste,=s TO HOME EE z •Q I I a I r - � I I BATH. — PROP. Lm `� _ 0 Z _ LIVING PROP. KITCHEN/ m Q Lu o ROOM m _I _ PROPOSED 10' � p Q 246.5 DINING -,— GONG. COLUMNS Q W Z = S.F. 255.5 S.F. UP W/ HELICAL PILES �'-4" "1'-4" 8'-5" 8'-5" 8'-8" g 0 I W Lo 41'-2" oLL Z rn 2'-IjY211 DN. �W4� ?,k - 0 A i .,..;: a;I'r . 40 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED FOUNDATION PLANr,�. � =, N N �.SCALE. . 14 ire ,F W Q y Z N W Y PROPOSED TOP OF BU ooW ELEV. +45.6' ' I U a J U ��Qma mw3z F-tpa Y g'L PROPOzPRIDc7F- Z I-Q N HEI&H/T J• --_----__—_____ ELEV. +35.6' � o LL o / - ¢pwox �¢zZ3 �'W a O C O 2 Q W Q 0 N U Ow� _———————_——_ U PROPOSED - - f w�xZW m o Q SECOND F.F. m y 3 p ELEV. +25.-7' W Z U it p ga�wx f T a sw��o � I `EAST PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FIRST FBI N 1 SH�ED_FLOOR Y ELEV. +15.8 II i � II li II 70 AVERAGE GRADE _ _ _ _ _ () ELEV. +11.8' Q m +-j + PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION (FRONT) -C 9-'ALE: 1/6"_ I'-O" U Q c� a_ p Q -------------- QFC 2 4 2025 z W W m O 0 — 3.0\\ W U) Cl) / \ J 10, ME; j�y� PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION (REAR) y�,; , a F 6 J.�� �° I Q w Y rwag s m w O FZ�Q U J Q YCJ V Q a Vy.V l out°�Z w mt�gw x 2O0 Qfn I �Q~Wa =azQWx zpLLox Q 2 W G w Q Oa~=V ywjdKW a O w0^o 12�jOOt — PRO�'05ED TOP OF BULKHEAD z a z o 1, ELEV. +45.6' , 12 2 o W k Z z c iw�xyQ I¢x3aor_r CZ QO � aZUU(yy7 F H O O d U — PROPO SED RIDGE - —— — -- HE I&HT ------------------ - ELEV. u� U o N m \ { 4-, m ———————— PROPOSED _ L m — � SECOND F.F.oib � ELEV. +25.7"'F Q NORTH PROPERTY LINE p 0 PROPOSED FIRST cc F I N15HED FLOOR G o��C o��� O ELEV. +15.8'� � Q AVERAGE GRAD — ELEV. +11.5' PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION (LEFT) PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION (RIGHT) SCALE: IW- I'-O° SCALE: 1W= I'-0' Z w w U) mo Q w Z ~ w 0 oZ 0) J AP a Al� 0 tr or 74 F I Glenn Goldsmith,President �Q�so�Ty Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President ,`�� Old 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Eric Sepenoski : '>' Southold,New York 11971 Liz Gillooly G Telephone(631) 765-1892 Elizabeth Peeples yo Fax(631) 765-6641 ON%�� BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 21, 2022 Anthony Portillo AMP Architecture LLC 1075 Franklinville Road Laurel, NY 11948 RE: 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW, LLC 9460 MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD, SOUTHOLD SCTM#: 1000-874-22 Dear Mr. Portillo: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, March 16, 2022 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, AMP Architecture on behalf of 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW, LLC applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated July 23, 2021, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council who was unable to make a recommendation as property was not staked at the time of their inspection; and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation that the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards in that: 1. Verify how the lot was created. 2. Groundwater is high EL 4.5' below grade and the basement should be reconsidered. 3. Seasonal and storm surge flooding is expected. I 4. Setbacks to wetlands should be maximized to the greatest extent practicable. 5. Establish and maximize vegetated buffers landward of wetlands; and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on February 16, 2022 and March 16, 2022, at which time all interested persons-were given an opportunity to be heard, and, - WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the structure(s), as applied for does not comply with the standards set forth in Southold Town Code Chapter 275712 A. Adversely affect the wetlands of the Town, Chapter 275-12D. Adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine organisms, aquatic wildlife and vegetation or the natural habitat thereof, and Chapter 275-12J. Adversely affect the aesthetic value of the wetland and adjacent areas, and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the request, as applied for, will have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the application of 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW, LLC to construct a proposed New 2 Stow Dwelling with Full Basement: Proposed 2 Story Dwelling: 16'X59' (945 SF); Proposed Wood Cantilevered Deck: 6'X22.3' (135 SF); Proposed Front Entry Stoop: 3'X14.7' (45 SF) ; Proposed Basement window well & Concrete entry stair; New IA OWTS: Buried at front/side of property; New Gravel Driveway: 560 SF; New Buried Drywells: (1) 6'x4' deep Drywell & (1) 6'x5' deep Drywell — located at front and side of property; New Buried Propane Tank: (1) 1,000 gallon tank buried at front of property; New Buried Utility Connections: At front of property; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by AMP Architecture, LLC received on March 7, 2022. This is not a determination from any other agency. Very truly yours, Glenn Goldsmith, President Board of Trustees GG/dd c \ FRO.EGT/ZONING DATA - LOT GOYER,46E _ TAX MAP a 1000-57-05-22 DESCRIPTION(FOOTPRINT) AREA %LOT 9 0 ZONING DISTRICT COVERAGE / AG NON-CONFORMIN6 5 / LOT AREA TOTAL LOT AREA 53�99.4 5.F. 6 3 c �1 A•q 12 ACRES 5 /,y PROPOSED RESIDENCE 1,125.0 SF. 2.196 TOTAL AREA OF ALL STRUCTURES II25A SF. 2.1% a a o g G ✓/F o E a��nFw. A. MAXIMUM LOT COVERASE ALLOINED-20% H / � ������� `• ` RECiUIRED;SETBALKS.,=MAIN&11LDIN6.. ` � REQUIRED PROPOSED GOFIPLIES Q< v FRONT YARD 50.0' 30.0' NO aiu=gag SIDE YARD 20.0' 20'0' YES i�^ BOTH SIDE YARDS 40.0' 815' Y75 / \ `t � REAR YARD 60A' 3550 YES Y ARD (FROMWEfLANP5) 75.0' 61B' WA ' ♦ � was � / OCTOB[3t 3i,2005 • � 60� TEST HOLE DATA BY . . \ 4 raenwcneM / 'go- �L a•8S' DARK B.A`I 91LTY • • • \ mmm�ree� lO' � LOAM EROYYJ SILT \� /? FAx . \ / rECEIVE S9' TOl� SAIlDawam P rYes GRMO KAT 43;njYv.. .. . . . . . —7 N22 WAT R M PALEGti`'P EROYM Mm TO W r ntTtustees 110 Q � m g Z9 . . . .. ... . . . :.. . . . . . . . . / .. g 3 Z mo . .. . . . • . . . . I / SITE LAYOVi NOTE5, m I.THIS IS AN ARCHITECTS SITE PLAN a IS m • • 1 / SUB.fEGT TO YMrICATION BY A LICENSED r • t• 1 / __ SURVEYOR. oN T IS SITE PLLAN 15 To THE �v¢Ee C y ARCHITECTS BEST OF KNOWLEDGE ®. 2.5URVEY INFORMATION KAS OBTAINED T ' / ®•�"'m FROM A SURVEY DATED NOVEMB IH, a .Z CIA 2021 AND PREPARED BY, Q rl-ALICF LAW IN6 * $ PROPOSED PARTIAL SITE JASON D.IFAOINCHAM PLAN \ TELEPHONE!(651)45T-2400 S-ALE,I'a 10'-0• �9T� 37405 �Q�� 0 �u) Board of Trustees 29 March 16, 2022 everything into this very oddly-shaped house existing footprint at we are trying to save as much as we can. And we have go ki d of back to the front of the property where we have the ele ric line coming in and then the water line coming in a d the s tic line,and we have all these setbacks, and the those things ave to be a certain distance from the property ' e. So, and en all of that then has the domino effect to a west side of th roperty to where we get to where we h e to put this wall. So to Rob , to what Rob was saying, you kn w, we were, we have figured o a way most likely that in resp se to your concerns,that w may be able to move the all off the property line by shifting the ngles of, the elements f the septic system, but the que ion that you just bro ght up about this three-foot thing, beca a property and ates, and we have to maintain that, we have . ree-foot dee leaching galleys that I don't think can be any sh (lower,ju because they don't manufacture them, and the we h e to, we have certain clearance from groundwater, we just d n't ave the depth to be anywhere lower, in this particular place, handle all the runoff. So we are trying very har t accommodate that, and in fact the owners, we just resub ' ed a plan to you because we removed the hot tub so th t we wo Id reduce the need for as much drywell capacity so that a could co pact that leaching galley area, so we could pos bly move the II. So they are making accommodations to erybody's conce s. TRUSTEE KRUPS I: Thank you. MR. HERRMAN . Thanks, Meryl. MS. KRAMER: ou're welcome. TRUSTEE K PSKI: Is there anyone else th t wishes to speak or additional c ments from the Board? (No respo e). I assume ou would like to table the application? MR. H RMANN: I think we need to do that. TRU EE KRUPSKI: Very good. Hearing no furthe comments, I'll ma a motion to table the application. T STEE PEEPLES: Second. T USTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Number 6, AMP Architecture on behalf of 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW, LLC requests a Wetland Permit to construct a proposed.tw.o-story dwelling with full basement consisting of a Proposed 20'x41' (820sq.ft.) two-story area and a 18'x18' (324sq.ft.) one-story area; a proposed 4'x17.8' (70.8sq.ft.) front covered porch; a proposed 6.2'x21.0' (88sq.ft.)front covered patio; a proposed 5'x29' (145sq.ft.) second story balcony; a,proposed basement window well and concrete entry stair; install a new I/A OWTS landward of dwelling; install an 810sq.ft. pervious driveway; install a proposed 15'6"x29' (450sq.ft.) pervious patio at grade against the seaward side of i Board of Trustees 30 March 16, 2022 dwelling; install gutters to leaders to two (2) 8'x4' deep drywells to contain roof runoff; install one (1) 1,000 gallon propane tank buried at front of property; install new buried utility connections at front and side of property; proposed regrading at perimeter of proposed rear of dwelling consisting of approximately 8,865 cubic feet of earth to be removed for construction excavation, the majority to remain at site for backfill and 2,300 cubic feet to be used.for proposed regrading. Located: 9450 Main Bayview Road, Southold. SCTM# 1000-87-5-22. The LWRP found this to be.inconsistent. The inconsistencies are: Verify how the lot was created. Groundwater as high elevation 4.5 feet below grade and the basement should be reconsidered. Seasonal and storm surge flooding is expected. Setbacks to wetland should be maximized to the greatest extent practical, and establish maximized vegetated buffer landward of wetlands. The Conservation Advisory Council could not make a recommendation at this time as the property was not properly staked and labeled, however according to the site plan, proposed structures do not meet the setbacks in accordance with Chapter 275. The Trustees most recently conducted an inhouse review of the new plans on March 9th, 2022. We do have new plans and a new project description stamped received March 7th, 2022. We also have a letter in the file from an Ashley and Isaac Hidenberg (sic) stating: As neighbors to the above property, we have not been notified of any activity for development. There was a sign posted a few months ago but it has been removed and we have yet to be notified by mail. Preservation of an environment should be highly considered when reviewing.this application, as we are strong advocates for conservation.of the wetlands in the north fork area, as well as with rising sea levels it should be of concern, and another consideration for this property and the surrounding properties do not adhere to over-develop the wetland area at this location. Thank you, for your attention to this matter. Is there anyone here wishing to speak regarding this application? MR. PORTILLO: Anthony Portillo, AMP Architecture. Good evening Board. So based on our last hearing we discussed that we had a different design. We went back to the drawing board and we tried to come in with a different approach for the new structure, basically pitting the structure out, reducing the setback from the.flagged wetlands. We are currently now proposing 61.8 feet. That is our closest distance that we are proposing. The building is 16 feet wide and 59 feet long. On the second floor we reduced the mass of the building and requesting two second-floor roof decks. We are proposing. Honestly we need to go to Zoning. They've asked us to come here first, but we have to go to the Zoning for the front yard Board of Trustees 31 March 16, 2022 setback of 30 feet. So hopefully we'll get relief from that, which I felt pretty good about because they have some homes there that are pretty close to their property line, so. Just a couple of things,just reflecting back on the first couple of comments, we did flag the lot, and we did flag the clearing it just sounded like there was no flagging done. We did the mail outs as well and we provided that to the Town. Notification was provided, so, I'm not sure about that. There was one other comment. The groundwater comment. I don't think that is accurate. Maybe there is a misconception on the groundwater. If you look at where the test hole is taken, the groundwater in that area is at 4.5, but that is lower on the topography. So where the house is located, its much higher:We actually provided a section in our packet which shows where groundwater would be at the elevation we are proposing the building at. I'm available for any questions. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Can you speak to the proximity to the freshwater wetlands? MR. PORTILLO: So again, we really did our best to minimize that. As you can see, the building is very skinny now. We are 30 feet from the front yard, so that is what is really, you know, and I don't, you know,the 30 foot I'm just using as basically looking at a non-conforming lot you are allowed to be 30 feet, so I kind of used that to place the front of the building. Because I think that is reasonable thing that this is somewhat of a non-conforming lot because of all the wetlands, which you can't really build on, but it's not looked at that way, so it is looked at as a conforming lot. So that's sort of how I determined let's stick to the 30-foot front yard setback. And conceivably we can't really go much smaller than 16 feet and get proper living space and a staircase, things like that. As you can see from the floor plan layout, it's pretty minimal. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: And you.have not been to the ZBA for that variance as of yet, correct? MR. PORTILLO:.No, we did go do ZBA it then they requested that we come here first. They wanted a ruling from the Trustees.We also have filed with the DEC. We've had minimal comments back, which we answered back. That was actually on our first design. I mentioned that last time. They didn't have much, you know, there was not really something that I thought'was going to get approved, but now we submitted this design, so we are waiting fore any other comments now that the design has been changed. But like I.said, comments from the DEC didn't.seem like we were going to have a problem getting the first design approved, so I'm feeling pretty confident that DEC will be on board with what we are proposing. In my past experience, I mentioned this last.time, normally they look at us to be 50 feet from freshwater wetlands. From what I have seen and what I have been allowed. But again, that's just my experience,just throwing that out there. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Per our Town Code, Chapter 275, Section 3, it l Board of Trustees 32 March 16, 2022 ,is 100 feet from the wetlands, and I think on a property like. this that has'never been built before, it's hard for us to grant 'relief in a situation like that. MR. PORTILLO: I appreciate that. But I did a little research. And I just want to let the Board know, that in 2020 there is a building that I think is a similar situation, that was built, very recently, freshwater wetlands, 35 feet, allowed by the Board. And I think the lot is very similar, that's why I picked this one. I provided it to your office to show you, to put on record, you know, some., precedence here. And we are double that TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH:As you know, each property is inherently unique, and each one has its own set of challenges. This one with the slope and the grade going to an undisturbed freshwater wetland and habitat, I don't think any previous application is applicable. MR. PORTILLO: Understood. I don't want to disagree with you, but I went to the site myself, and there is a slope at the site. Same kind of situation, watering hole, essentially, which is what is here. And, in my opinion, and also in the opinion of people that we hired to look at the site for us, and it's pretty much, in my opinion, the same type of situation.And I understand that all-sites are different, but I would just like to bring that to the Board's attention, that this is in Southold town. Southold, not just the township, it's actually in Southold. And in my opinion it's a very similar situation. I'm not saying it's exact, but I would hope the Board would look at this, because my client is here as well, you know, is trying to build a small home for his family and would like to, you know, do that on his property, and I think seeing that this is a similar situation, I think.maybe the Board can think about that. Again, I'm just putting that out there. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Looking at the plans you submitted March 7th, 2022, it shows 50-foot front yard setback with the entirety of the house within that proposed setback; is that correct? MR. PORTILLO: The most recent, 30 feet is the front yard setback. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Because we have 50 feet. MR. PORTILLO: That's a 3. I'm sorry. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Okay, this isn't 50 foot? MR. PORTILLO: That's.a 3. I'm sorry. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Is there anyone else here who wishes to speak regarding this application? MS. KIRSCH: Hi. My name is Mary Kirsch and i own the property adjacent. And we have been here before, and I think as far as the criteria goes, 100-foot setback, um, his client can't do. The Zoning Board is short 20 feet. It's really sensitive. I feel like I'm repeating this,with the peepers and the salamanders and all that. And, um, something else that I didn't mention in the past is that 25 years ago, when I went and started my journey, I started at the end of Main Bayview and worked up the different lots. And when I reached this particular, Mr. Marra'; I Board of Trustees 33 March 16, 2022 lot, it was a little less. And I went to the Trustees back then, 1 did my homework, and the Trustees back then said to me, Mary, you can build there a tree house. Find another piece of property. So that's what I did. I understood, it didn't fit with the--there is hardly any footage in that piece-of property that you can put a real kind of house. So I.built next door. I just, it's just an un-buildable lot, and you have to do your homework when you buy a property. And if Mr. Marra didn't do his homework, that's unfortunate. MS. HULSE: Can you be more specific, ma'am, you just sort of glossed over what you said you repeated before. This is a new hearing. Can you just refer to exactly what your feeling that the environmental impact that was, as you stated, negative, could you be more specific about that? MS. KIRSCH: Sure. First of all, it's pretty much in the middle of the fresh water buffer zone. It can't comply with that setback. It can't comply with the Zoning Board because you need a 50-foot front setback, and it only has 30.There is a really sensitive pond there. He calls it a waterhole, but it's alive and well, and the peepers showed up last night. It's kind of ironic, the frogs, and it's really a sensitive piece of property. And even the water table. He's proposing that it has not changed. It's changed. The whole creek, Corey Creek, has changed. So it's just, in my opinion, it's an un-buildable piece of property. It was like that 25 years ago and it has not changed, and in fact it's probably even more difficult now. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you, ma'am. MS. KIRSCH: Thank you. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Is there anyone else here wishing to speak regarding this application? MR. PORTILLO: A couple of things I forgot to mention. We also raised the foundation up in our proposal here to reduce, the amount of disturbance, obviously, since we don't have to remove as much fill or soil. And we are proposing to put a silt fence, obviously, during construction, to protect, we really plan on not disturbing the land that much. You can see where our clearance line is. I also, and I'm not saying that there is not groundwater there, I'm just stating the fact where we are placing the house, the groundwater is not 4.3 feet. I'm letting you guys know. From my section it's a lot more than that. Because it is a higher part of the lot, then it slopes down. The Board also, in the past, has,asked for a non-turf buffer.We are more than willing to do a 50-foot non-turf buffer. We have the space to do that and we are, the building is far enough back, if it's something the Board wants to suggest, I don't see an issue with that. I think also Mr. Marra here, I think you should talk to the Board. MR. MARRA: Good evening, we are just trying to build a little family house for us. It's very hard to, obviously, as everyone Board of Trustees 34 March 16, 2022 I'm "sure knows, to buy property out here now. And it's more expensive and we are trying to do something on the this lot. It's a huge lot. We are just trying to build a small house on the front. We don't want to disturb anything, we want to., you know, keep everything the way it is. That's why we are trying to keep.everything as far away as we can from the buffer. I understand people looked at the house 25 years ago. It was a lot more buildable. 1 don't have that choice. It's probably a quarter the price. So we really appreciate your consideration. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank.you, sir. Is there anyone else here that wishes to speak regarding this application? MR. PORTILLO: I just want to state as well, as we stated before, just want to rebuttal the last statement. We agree there is a front yard setback issue and, as I said, the Zoning Board, which we visited seemed'somewhat pliable to that request of 30 feet. It was more just to come here first.' Normally that is not the situation, normally we are able to get the variance and then come to the Board to request the Trustees. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank.you. Yes, sir? MR. PASSANANT: Good evening, my name is Tom Passanant..And I guess like 1 said last time, this is my second time before any hearing. I would not be here opposing anything if it fit within the boundaries that are what the town has set up in the'first place. I had received a mailing of the revised property of the house, and I saw the 16 feet. And I'm really, I don't want to be too simple. I guess I am. But what looks very obvious to me is the 50 foot line that is coming up 30 feet, that is 20 feet extended over, and then it's a 100-foot line that I think is proposed 61.2 in that area. So it's like a total of 60 feet or more for a 16-foot house. And the way I look at it, it likes overlaps like this, that there is literally no room. Under these guidances, I would never want to deny someone to build a home in a space that is designed, you know, my father did it alone 50 years ago,came to the north fork. The pond to me is an issue. It is a viable pond. There is a lot of life there.When I see homes that are being built, when I drive around on my job, pretty much a lot of the land is, if not completely clear cut, a lot of the trees are taken down. And I would, I know they said they would protect'it with barriers that they have, but it seems like it would be a great disturbance to that pond. And the peepers were out last night. It was .interesting. And it's a nice sound. It's a nice sound of spring. Again, I would not object to anyone, if they built a home within what is doable or defined by the town. And that's all I would ask your consideration with that, is the overlay, seems like there is no room to build anything, unfortunately. But that's.how that land is. So, thank you. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you, sir. Is there anyone else here wishing.to speak regarding this application? MR. PORTILLO: Just again, maybe a little bit of misconstrued. t Board of Trustees 35 March 16, 2022 But that's why we are here, because we are within your jurisdiction. So we are asking the Board for the relief on this, and that's the reason we have to go to the Zoning Board, we are asking for relief there as well. It's pretty common to get relief from the Board. And it's pretty common to get relief from the Zoning Board. So I think that is what is at stake here is what you believe is a good project and that we are, as Mr. Marra stated, he's not looking to do anything destructive. Our clearing line has been majorly reduced. The house footprint has been reduced.We've gone back to the drawing board and really rethought this, and repositioned the house in a way that is minimal disturbance, as much has minimal as possible, as I stated. The foundation is not going, before having showed it, it was going seven foot into the ground:That is no longer the case. So less disturbance. So I think that we took at heart the things you guys had to say to me last time and really thought about it and, you know, that's what we brought forward to the Board. So,just to be clear, that is why we are here. So for you guys to make a judgment call on what we are proposing. The DEC has 300 feet, so I have to go to DEC and they have to make a ruling on what I'm proposing. So. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Just to be clear, you don't have any DEC permits as of yet? MR. PORTILLO: No, we actually had to resend this in, so it will be renewed again. We had comments back on the original, it seemed something that was going to be a problem. But we'll have to wait to get comments back on this or approval on this. But this was resubmitted about a week and a half ago, two weeks ago. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you. Any questions or comments from the Board? TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI:The application before us, we've given it, I as one Trustee in particular, I can't speak for the Board, but I have given it quite a bit of thought and I always return to the code in these situations, and it's interesting, 275-3, for those of you out there that have not read it yet, it says that the Town Board of the Town of Southold finds that rapid growth, the spread of development and increasing demands upon natural resources are encroaching upon or eliminating many of its wetlands and patent lands which are preserved and maintained in the undisturbed natural condition constitute important physical, social, esthetic, recreational and economic assets to existing and future residents of the Town of Southold. As,someone who ran for office with the intent of preserving the natural character of the community, I find it difficult to support an application with such proximity to the freshwater wetlands. But I am one Trustee and can't speak for the other members of the Board. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you. Any other questions or comments? (Negative response). Hearing no further comments, I make a motion to close this hearing. Board of Trustees 36 March 16, 2022 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). With the inconsistency from the LWRP with proximity to sensitive wetlands that are undisturbed currently, and wildlife, this particular application violates Chapter 275-12(a) because it adversely affects the wetlands of the Town, and 275-12(d) adversely affects fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine organisms,aquatic wildlife and vegetation or the natural habitat thereof, in accordance with all of that, I make a motion to deny this application as submitted due to those reasons. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH:All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Number 7, AMP Architecture on behalf of P IP & LIA CHASEN requests a Wetland Permit to constr t a 14N1 23'4" (350sq.ft.) pool house; proposed reconstructe 10.2'x2 .1' deck on seaward side of dwelling; and to inst and perpetua maintain a 7'wide (1,375sq.ft.) non-turf bu r along the l dward edge of the top of the bank. Located: 15 Long Creek Drive, Southold. SCT 1000-55-7-3 The Conse ation Advisory Council resolved support this application. The onservation Advisory Counc' supports the application with a 5-foot non-turf buffer plan d with native vegetation, and rem vable retractable stair at the base of the bluff stairs. And the LWRP does nd this to be nsistent with the following notes: Retain th veget itio andward of the wetland boundary.as a buffer to furt r Poli 6. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees sh II nsider this recommendation. And we have. I am in receipt of new plan st ped received February 18th, 2022, depicted a 15-f t non- rf buffer. Is there anyone here w' hing to s ak regarding this application? MR. PORTILLO: Anth y Portillo, AMP rchitecture.We have provided,the 15-foot on-turf buffer as re ested. If you have any questions, I'm ppy to answer them. TRUSTEE GILL O LY: is there anybody els here wishing to speak regarding this a plication? (Negative res nse). Any questio or comments from the Board? (Negative esponse). TRUST GILLOOLY: I make a motion to close this Paring. TRUS E KRUPSKI: Second. TR TEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor?. ( L AYES). USTEE GILLOOLY: I make a motion to approve this ap ication with the'riew plans stamped dated February 18, 2022. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Second. Glenn Goldsmith,President ®� so(/f� Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President ,L®� ��® 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Eric Sepenoski 5H Southold,New York 11971 Liz Gillooly Telephone(631) 765-1892 Elizabeth Peeples ® i0 Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 18, 2022 Anthony Portillo AMP Architecture LLC 10200 Main Road, Unit 3A Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW, LLC 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD, SOUTHOLD SCTM#: 1000-87-5-22 Dear Mr. Portillo: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, July 13, 2022 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, AMP Architecture on behalf of 9460 MAIN BAYVIEW, LLC applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated May 3, 2022, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council who was unable to make a recommendation as property was not staked at the time of their inspection; and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation that the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards 6.2 A. and 6.3 D. E; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on July 13, 2022, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, t WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the structure(s), as applied for does not comply with the standards set forth in Southold Town Code Chapter 275-12 A. Adversely affect the wetlands of the Town; and Chapter 275-12D. Adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine organisms, aquatic wildlife and vegetation or the natural habitat thereof, and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the request, as applied for, will have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the application of 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW, LLC to construct a proposed 16'x59' (945sq.ft.) two-story dwelling on a proposed 10 x10' concrete piers upon helical piles (24 total) foundation with Azek Break-Away walls; aproposed a 6'x22.3' (135sq.ft.),wood cantilevered deck; and a proposed 3'x14.7' (45sq.ft.) cantilevered front entry deck; install a new I/A OWTS sanitary system buried at front/side of property; install a 560sq.ft. gravel driveway; install (1) 6'x4' deep drywell and (1) 6'x5' deep drywell located at front and side of property; install (1) 1,000 gallon propane tank at front of property; and install buried utility connections at front of property; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by AMP Architecture, LLC received on May 3, 2022. This is not a determination from any other agency. Very truly yours, .ek e4"- Glenn Goldsmith, President Board of Trustees GG/dd TAX MAP o 1000-2,-I-05-27 DE9GRIPTION(FooTpRINT)" AI�A.• E .a,ks g ^ oaiwaw< ZANIN5 DIs7WLT AG NON-COWORMINS 0�5 'g g TOTAL LOT AREA 53$99.4 SF. S h �T ` I�ACRES IM PROPOSW RESIDENCE 1125A SF. 21% s@c `\ 9q)•V/ TOTAL AREA OF ALL 9TRUGTURES IIZSA SP. 21% e q a MAXINEIM LOT GOVEPASF ALi O -20% \ ��o Jugs tuitt sts' _ a Ell REOUIRED ,•PROPOSED COMPLIES sN�E ffc FRONT YARD 5010' 50.01 NO/ g2 SIDE YARD 20.0' 20.0' YES fi�I BOTH SIDE YARDS Opp' BIS' YEs P.a.'d'au'6x / r� AK REAR YARD 60.0' 95HA' YES •� �1'.� °4.` `�/ L'�, — �/� REAR YARD 4-=�y (PROM 11LA11) 'f5A• E l-b ��+a wA rEC=MAY E \ / � `\ ♦ SIWwW town 0 %T HOLE DATA BY . \ �`x/ / MCDONALD 6EOSGIENCE g • wT aNs9.xT o `� ... \ 'F / D' DARK BRD1N SILTY • � ♦ ra ERDIrol sat .. . . .. .. . \ �4p / `J9' — PALE BROYN FII✓e /T BRRf✓D Y4ATCR 49' • • • • • • •• // / hV.TER TO FN FINE i0 W p ti �on7� LLJ z • • ♦ I.TMIS IS AN ARCNITT T'S SITE PLAN 4 IS SUB.BGT TO VERIFICATION BY A LICENSm fir- N T Id SITE I PLAN Is TO TI M �D�� O THIS �•7�� i ARCNITEGTS BEST OF KNOA FA6E. VJRV MATION D N VENMR l - 1 FROM A FAJRVEY RM 15 NOVB BER 2021 AND PREPARED 6T. SCALICE LANb SURVEYING PROPOSED PARTIAL 51TE PLAN T X"I�(651)-1s 2400 (P k $ SCALE:r°lo'-O" 9p� 37406 i` Board of Trustees 19 July 13, 2022 of it i being closed in, but more of a three-season room It's unheated. t would be finished like with possibly p-boar or something li e that on the walls, and maybe some sort f ceiling finish. But i will still remain a deck underneath. t will be an open structu So the idea is to build on t of that. We did file ith New York State Departmen of Environmental Conservation, and have approval there. we did have to go to Zoning and we did eceive approval fro Zoning as well. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Okay, thank you. MR. PORTILLO: One thing just to let e Board know, Zoning did have, did ask that the r fters stay pen, but we went back and wrote a letter, we gave i to Kim, to the administrative office, and they are reviewing that to b sically -- they might hopefully would amend that request, be a se we are not putting in any heat, we are not insulating ' . It's just closed from the wind and insects and stuff like ha That's the purpose of it. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank y I wo ld also just recommend doing gutters to leaders to ywells on the property. MR. PORTILLO: Not a oblem. We'l take care of that. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: T nk you. Is ther anyone else-here wishing to speak to this ap ication, or any ad 'tional comments from the Board? (Negative re onse) . Hearing no , I make a motion to close th hearing. TRUSTEE P PLES: Second. TRUSTEE OLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL ES) . TRU EE KRUPSKI: I make a motion to ,approve thi application w' h the stipulation of stainless steel hardware o prevent torm damage, thereby bringing it into consistency ith the LWRP coordinator. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Second. All in favor? (ALL AYES) . TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Number 8, AMP Architecture on behalf of 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW, LLC requests a Wetland Permit to construct a proposed 161x59' (945sq.ft. ) two-story dwelling on a proposed 10"x10" concrete piers upon helical piles (24 total) foundation with Azek Break-Away walls; a proposed a 6'x22.3' (135sq.ft. ) wood cantilevered deck; and a proposed 3'x14.7 ' (45sq.ft. ) cantilevered front entry deck; install a new I/A OWTS sanitary system buried at front/side of property; install a 560sq.ft. Gravel driveway; install (1) 61x4' deep drywell and (1) 6'x5' deep drywell located at front and side of property; install (1) 1, 000 gallon propane tank at front of property; and install buried utility connections at front of property. Located: 9450 Main Bayview Road, Southold. SCTM# 1000-87-5-22 The LWRP found this proposed project to be inconsistent. The inconsistency stems from a number of concerns, which are as follows: New York State DEC permit does not current single family home configuration. Note the lot coverage calculation is incorrect. Lot coverage is calculated for buildable land only, subtracting all wetland areas from total parcel acreage. The straight line showing the northwest delineation line of the Board of Trustees 20 July 13,2022 freshwater wetland is odd and requires verification from 1962 aerial photo below, included in this finding, shows a more circular wetland. Further, the wetland seems larger than depicted in the file. These sets of freshwater wetland expand and contract seasonally, due to the hydro-period indicative of this area. Test hole data shows water encountered at four-and-a-half feet below grade. The hole was dug in 2005 and data is 17-years old. Updated data should be required. Corey Creek is a New York state Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. The surrounding upland area is an important habitat that provides value to wildlife species. Finally, a non-disturbance buffer is not proposed in freshwater wetlands. Wetlands and benefits are dependent upon the condition of adjacent lands which provide buffers between wetlands and surrounding uses. These buffers are necessary to ensure the long-term viability of the Town's wetlands. That concludes the findings of the LWRP. The Conservation Advisory Council of the Town of Southold resolved not to support the application. And the Conservation Advisory Council does not support the application because the project is not in compliance with Chapter 275 Wetlands, and inconsistent with the LWRP. The Trustees most recently visited the site at field inspection July 6th, 2022, and the notes from that visit were reviewed during work session. The Trustees did review the application during work session, looking at plans stamped May 3rd, 2022, and considered the -survey that was given to our office on June 28th, 2022. We also received a letter from Ashley and Isaac Ichenberg, residents on Main Bayview Road. And I'll try to summarize their comments briefly. - The property was not properly noticed. The area should be considered highly valuable because of the wetlands resources. And the third consideration, which is more expansive, states that rising sea levels predicted in our area which threatens flooding on this property and adjacent properties. Without further ado, I would invite comments from the public. MR. PORTILLO: So this proposal was obviously, you guys saw this a few months ago. One of the biggest changes we came up with that we thought should be considered was that we were considering removing the basement, not digging up, you know, not digging the land, and putting in a helical pile system with piers. So we really thought this would reduce the disturbance of the land. The other thing, after the denial last time, was we did receive approval from DEC on our original application, which was the original application we had with Trustees that we then revised the design based on comments received by the Board. Regarding the mark out of the fresh water was done in 2021. We will get a new test hole, which will be required moving forward with the septic system. We'll have to obviously do that for the Health Department. So, you know, I think the large change here of not digging Board of Trustees 21 July 13, 2022 t a basement, which I think was one of the larger comments from what I heard last time, from the LWRP, we took out the basement and we considered looking at this as a post beam construction. And it really does reduce the disturbance to the land. So a helical pile, just to describe it, is basically a corkscrew that gets drilled in. We would be putting in a grade beam so we would not be taking any berth away. It would be at grade. And we would be building columns from there and then the structure on top of it. So our proposal changed in that sense and, like I said, that now at this time we have the DEC approval of the last design. Obviously we have to go back to DEC to submit our revised drawing based on what the design changes are. But I thought that, you know, coming back to the Board to discuss this, um, because of, you have these couple of, these large revisions, but also 'this evolution of what happened with the DEC, I thought it was something the Board would consider thinking about a little further. Unfortunately the owner of the property was unable to make it today due to some family matters. He did want to speak to you guys again, but he's looking to put something small on the property for his family, as he expressed last time. And we are looking for the Board to consider something and, you know, we are willing to discuss it further. We are willing to work with the Board, if it's going to a workshop with you guys, but we think that there should be something we can do here. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Thank you. So how does this new application address our previous. concerns about the proximity to the wetlands? MR. PORTILLO: Well, like I said, based on our last application, we were showing larger .excavation amount, where we were going to remove, basically digging into the ground and taking dirt out and creating a basement. So by doing this, you know, helical pile structure, it's a lot less disruption. It's basically drilling into the ground and building up from there. So we are not, I mean, we obviously need to clear, we are willing to clear a small portion where the house is going to be, and we'll leave the rest, you know, the way it is. We won't touch it. We just need enough room to be able to do the drilling portion. The truck can be at street and then it can drill from there. So we don't have to do a large clearing. I think it's a good solution to the discussion from last time. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Are there any comments? TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: The primary concern I had last time was the distance to the wetlands. You are seeking nearly 40o relief from our code, with a distance bf 62 feet from the wetlands, where we require 100 feet. You have not moved it at all, and that was the primary concern I had last time. So can you address that at all. MR. PORTILLO: So if that's a concern then maybe there is something we can consider in the design to get further away from the wetland. I mean, we obviously have a zoning issue here. We do need go to the Zoning Board and request a front yard variance. Doing research in this area, there are homes that are, you Board of Trustees 22 July 13, 2022 know, 15, 20 feet off of' the street. So, you know, maybe we can adjust that and try to get' a little closer to the street. The thing is zoning, really, they heard us first, they wanted us to come here. So I mean, adjusting that distance, it' s something, and it's a difficult situation, right, because it's one Board then another Board. I'm not sure where Zoning is going to be on this. I'm not -sure if they are going to approve us to be 30 fate. 30 feet to me makes •sense, because if you look at a property that, if you look at an R40 property, front yard setback is 30 feet, if you, are a certain lot coverage, which, I'm sorry, a certain lot size. So in my mind we are at a certain lot size here because most of it, there is wetland there. So that was going to be the way that I was going to go and present that to Zoning, that we really should be considered with this, and being 30 feet off the front property line makes sense. Again, there- is some homes that are on this street that are 20 feet off the property line. You know, so I would use that as part of my argument with Zoning. Again, Zoning asked us to come here first, so, we are back here for that reason. And 2'm trying to create a structure that I think, like I said, we don't need as much clearing to do this type of application. We really just need enough room to get in the there and to drill in the helical piles and then we can do our work from there. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: The plans we are in receipt of, those were prepared for this Board; is that correct? MR. PORTILLO: That's correct, yes. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: So is there a reason why on there it says the rear yard setback required; is 75 feet from the wetlands when our code .states 100 feet? MR. PORTILLO: Just one thing to state to the Board, our original application to the DEC, I know you guys don't make decisions based on what DEC makes decisions but, you know, our original application -- TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: We are actually a totally different Board from the DEC and DEC does not regulate wetlands smaller than 11.4 acres. They leave that to local jurisdictions like us to deal with, so that's why you are here. MR. PORTILLO: Okay, no problem. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Obviously we can't speak for another Board as far as the setbacks from the road and everything. From this Board's perspective we areilooking to protect the environment the best way we can. So obviously we want as much distance from whatever structure you arelproposing in that wetlands. I know it's a tough position to go back and forth between two Boards, but obviously we would like it as close to the road and as far away from wetlands as possible, which may not be necessarily what the ZBA is looking for. So that is something we would like to see. We do appreciate you are trying to work with the ground disturbance. So, you know', I think between the lack of ground disturbance and potentially moving it closer to the road, we might be heading in the right direction here. I don't think we are there yet. i Board of Trustees 23 July 13, 2022 I don't think this particular application adequately addresses our previous concerns, but I think we are moving in the right direction. Whether we get there or not, I don't know. But I don't know if this one is quite there. MR. PORTILLO: I mean, could I propose that I go back to the Zoning Board, I guess and 'start, maybe, that conversation over with them, and see if I can work out what they would accept as a front yard variance. I mean, that would help me adjust our building line. I mean, our building positioning. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Unfortunately, one has nothing to do with the other. So what you propose to us may not be what the ZBA ultimately allows. So, you know, to find a distance that potentially works for us and then, you know, after that, take it to the ZBA. MR. PORTILLO: I understand. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: It's up to you if you would like to do that, obviously. MR. PORTILLO: Um, well, seeing that they actually asked me to come here, I probably would be bounced back. So I would imagine, so it might not make much sense. So I guess I would, let me do a little more recognizance on the area and see what I believe ZBA might allow me to push the home up to the road, and then I guess. I'll take a little bit of a gamble there and see if I can get it to a point where you guys are satisfied with the distance from the fresh water. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: I was also surprised not to see any non-disturbance buffer on the plans you submitted to us. Based on our comments last time. I would think that would be a very extensive non-disturbance buffer, and we really shouldn't be doing this at a public hearing. We should be getting complete applications that are really ready for us to consider. This is no way near that for me. MR. PORTILLO: Understood. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Just to piggyback off that. With a property of this environmental significance and fragility, I would recommend, you know, something, you know, complete non-disturbance surrounding any structure. MR. PORTILLO: Fair. Okay, if I can have some time, I would like to come back. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Is there anyone else in the audience this evening to speak to this application? MS. KIRSCH: Hi, my name is Mary Kirsch and I have property adjacent to the 9450 building proposal. And a legal friend advised, suggested that I express this. So I ask the public hearing of record and the Trustees files for the prior application previously heard by this Board on February 16th, 2022, and March 16th, 2022, made by AMP Architecture on behalf of 9450 Main Bayview LLC, and your decision in this matter be incorporated into the record for this application. MS. HULSE: You are not permitted to do that. It's a different application. MS. KIRSCH: All right, all right. So, to continue on, I own the property adjacent, and first thing I should probably mention is Board of Trustees 24 July 13, 2022 that it was posted incorrectly. It was not on that property. And the only reason I discovered it is because I take my daily walks. Aside from that, my first and most important concern with this building package is, again, environmental. It's in the middle of the buffer zone. 58 feet, they want to, 58 distance from the pond and to create their building, which is kind of absurd because it's a really sensitive piece of property. They don't comply at all with the 100,-foot fresh water setback, which is the Southold code, which you guys enforce. The other thing is, I know some, that pond, I've lived there for 25 years. And it's a big pond. It's 75 feet by about 35 feet wide. And it's a vernal pond and it's alive and well. You can come to my deck, mid-April, the peepers start singing and then I got the bullfrogs and then I have the salamanders and then I have the turtles that lay eggs in my compost. So it's, um, it's, it would be really a hardship that all would disappear, because as soon as the trucks come in and the, everything disappears. You'll no longer have that whole environment. Besides, also, the snakes, the possums, the deer, the hawks, the owls. Right now that area is pretty much a nature preserve at this point in time. Um, the other thing that was disturbing was, a front yard of 30 feet is also ridiculous. It doesn't meet the code from the Zoning Board. So another issue that was about, you heard, you discussed it earlier, about the test hole of 2005. And I tell you, that pond goes up and down all year. It's different. And around the perimeter of that pond, gets really saturated and really wet, depending, I don't know if it's the moon or the stars or the springs, but it should be noted that as far as leaching and all that kind of thing, that's going to be another problem. So the Trustees have rejected this proposal as well as the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and the Conservation Advisory Counsel, all stating that it does not comply with Southold code and that it is environmentally unsound. So if you can't meet the correct criteria for all these different agencies I just mentioned, I believe this proposal should be denied. 25 years ago, I took a look at that property and the Trustees said to me then, Mary, find something else. It's impossible, that piece. Iti's, really difficult, and I just hope that you consider this as a very sensitive piece of property. Thank you. For your time. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you. MR. PASSANANT: Good evening, everyone, my name is Tom Passanant, and I too live next door. For the last seven years I've been there. I attended the March 16th hearing, and when I left that night, I just had a sense that a little piece of Southold Town was saved. And I didn't celebrate, I didn't gloat. It just sounded like a piece was protected. And the strength of the decision was what Mr. Sepenoski and Ms. Gillooly had mentioned about the hundred-foot distance from the pond, freshwater pond. And I remember that. And I went there this Board of Trustees 25 July 13,2022 morning and I paced out with my own pace, about six feet of pace. I measured 100 feet from the freshwater pond, and I measured 50 feet in from the roadway. And the distance, the two lines didn't meet, but there was approximately 16 feet in that space. So if the integrity of those dimensions were to be maintained, it would not allow for any type of structure. I also saw on the map that was submitted, 50 feet that they include, had a line drawn across the street from Bayview. It was not from the line of the property line itself. So that reduced it to 30 feet. I too, I saw copies of what Mr. Sepenoski and Ms. Gillooly had quoted, and Mary, too, and I just highlighted the LWRP's July 6th proposal as recommended as inconsistent with the LWRP policies. And I also saw the Conservation Advisory Council resolution, same date, July 6th, resolved to not support the application of 9450 Main Bayview LLC to construct a single-family dwelling. And all six members had voted aye to support that. And their conclusion said because the project is not in compliance with Chapter 275 Wetlands and LWRP. It seems such a strong position, I guess, against the proposal. And also, the final thing is, it is a sensitive spot. You know, when I went there today, it was bone dry, but what Mary was trying to say, in the seasons, the rain, it fills up, it fills up. In springtime hundreds if not thousands of those tree frogs, turtles and two other different frogs. I have seen eggs laid in my compost heap. I walked over to Wolf Preserve up the street on Bayview. They used to have pictures of all the animals that were there, and it's pretty comparable to what this project is. Oh, I forgot, after I left in March 16th, I wanted to thank the Board for their decision. I went over to the Town Hall and nobody was there but Ms. Cantrell, and I said can you tell them thank you. You know, never having an experience with this before, I thought that was the end. And you said, they can appeal. So that's clearly what has happened, and it sounds like it's possible to happen again. So I hope the same requirements would still be in effect. And the last thing I'll say is it is a sensitive piece of property. Over time nature has made that look like a preserve, like Mary said. I can stand there and see it. Nature kind of reclaimed it. And I think it is a piece of property that is worth preserving and is worth protecting and is worth saving. Thank you. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you. MS. HULSE: For clarification, on the record. This is not actually an appeal from the previous denial. This is actually a new application. I know it� seems like that because it's a similar application, but it is a new application, which is why we couldn't incorporate the old testimony into this new one. So it's good that you showed up to provide the testimony tonight. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: We welcome public participation, so I encourage else -to come forward and speak regarding this application. MR. SCALICE: Charles Scalice, I'm an adjacent property as well. I appreciate what you guys' do, and I appreciate owners' rights as Board of Trustees 26 July 13,2022 well. But going back a couple of years, this property had fallen into foreclosure, bankruptcy, and I was at the courthouse steps when it was being sold. And the judge told the buyer several times, you know this property is probably unbuildable' because of the environmental issues of the property. And the buyer kept on saying we acknowledge, we acknowledge. Okay, then went to the buyer. The buyer then did some tests and realized it was maybe an uphill struggle or just unbuildable. It then went on the market as listing that says we make no representation. Might not be buildable. This gentleman bought the property and is now here for the second or third time, I don't really know, asking for forgiveness, if you will, okay, and can we build on it, when it was well instructed that it was most likely unbuildable because of the environment sensitivity. Wasting your time, my time, everyone's time. Just because they are trying to shove a square peg in a round hole. And I appreciate, if it' s buildable, he should build. But it doesn't seem that way. That's all have I to say. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Just for the edification, if you will, of the audience, the determination of whether or not a lot is buildable lies with the Building Department. However our code gives us powers to make decisions regarding properties where environmental impact is present and significant. Thank you. MR. PORTILLO: And I appreciate that. I was going to say something similar to that. We are not here to make a square peg into a round hole. We are here to work with the Boards and we are here, I'm here doing my job so, to help my client. I don't think, just for the record, I don't think he was thought that the land would have as many issues, otherwise I don't think he would have purchased it. So it's hard to say what he knew and what this person knew. I just don't think that's a viable thing. MS. HULSE: It's not really relevant to this Board's consideration anyway. MR. PORTILLO: I agree. Anyway, my point is we would want to work with the Board, that's what we here for. I would ask for an adjournment. I'll be taking the comments from the Board, I'll bring it back to my clients and see if we can put together something that makes sense, for everybody, hopefully makes sense for the Board and I guess we'll see where it goes from there. You know, that would be my request. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Mr. Portillo, the opportunities this Board presents to applicants are; extensive, in fact. We have a pre-submission process whereby we invite applicants to meet us Trustees, all five of us in the field, to get a sense of what the applicant's needs are, ! what they would like to do, and where we come from, in terms of an environmental impact. We then review plans extensively. As people have pointed out in the audience, we've review plans your plans extensively, multiple times. We've visited the location multiple times. And we've also had two public hearings regarding this application. My point is there is ample opportunity to understand the Trustees' concerns before we get to public hearings and, as Mr. Board of Trustees 27 July 13, 2022 Scalise has said, wasted this Board's time and the audience members' time as well. So respectively, I deny your request to adjourn or table this application, and I make a motion to close this hearing. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Roll call vote on the motion to close, start with Trustee Peeples. Aye or nay if you want to close it. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Aye. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Trustee Gillooly? TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Aye. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Trustee Sepenoski? TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Aye. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Trustee Krupski? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Aye TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Trustee; Goldsmith. Aye. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: I make a motion to deny this application. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Based on Chapter 275, inconsistency with the LWRP proximity to wetlands that are undisturbed currently and wildlife, this particular application violates 275-12 (a) because it adversely affects the wetlands of Southold Town, and 275-12 (b) , adversely affects fish, shellfish and other beneficial marine organisms, aquatic wildlife and vegetation within the natural habitat. thereof. In accordance with all that, I make an application to deny this application as submitted due to those reasons, TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES) . TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Number 9, Jeffrey Patanjo on behalf of ANTHONY & BE RICE FALCONE requests a Wetland Permit to install a propose 41x6' cantilevered platform off of bulkhead; a 3�o`rtleccd e by 14' to aluminum ramp; and a 61x20' floating dock su with two (2 10" diameter CCA piles and situated par el to the bulkhead. Located: 405 Wi iamsberg Road, Southold. SCT 1000-78-5-17 The Trustees ost recently did an inho e review, reviewing the plan received e 14th, and the new roject description as written here. I'll re d it into the r ord now. The proposed pro je t includes 'nstallation of two 4110"x12'3" long persona water aft floats, total of 118.3 square feet, fastened to a 's ng bulkhead, in an end to end pattern so as not to obstrx navigation in existing channel. The LWRP reviewed is ap lication, found it to be consistent, recommend minimize g CCA-treated materials in the New York DOS signi 'cant coastal ' sh and wildlife habitat area. And the Co ervation Advisory ouncil reviewed this application a resolved to support i I do ve a letter from our offic dated June 21st, asking the foll ing: The two questions: Are the jet ski floats just being ied to the bulkhead, no ramp to go down to them. That was the main concern. Is there anyone here wishing to speak regarding this BOARD MEMBERS ��oF SO(/jy� Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Patricia Acampora Southold,NY 11971-0959 Robert Lehnert,Jr. Office Location: Nicholas Planamento G'nc► • a0� Town Annex/First Floor Margaret Steinbugler COMM 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold,NY 11971 RECEIVE® http://southoldtownny.gov #&4 G ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JUL 2 9 2025 Tel. (631) 765-1809 ou hod Mourn Clerk FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF DULY 24,2025 ZBA FILE: #7992 NAME OF APPLICANT: Daniel Marra/9450 Main Bayview LLC PROPERTY LOCATION: 9450 Main Bayview Road, Southold NY SCTM: 1000-87-5-22 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was not required to be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated May 12, 2025. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department,as well as the records available, it is recommended that the proposed action is EXEMPT from Coastal Consistency Review. f. Granting of individual setback, lot line and lot area variances, except in relation to a regulated natural feature o'r a bulkhead or other shoreline defense structure or any activity within the CEHA. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION. -The subject,non-conforming,53,596.2 square feet, 1.23-acre parcel located in tre Agricultural Conservation(A-C) Zoning District measures 145.00 feet along Main Bayview Road, then runs south 435.59 feet along the easterly property lire,then runs-115.00 feet along the southerly property line,and returns too the roadway.416.73 feet along-the westerly property line. Currently,the property is vacant and is covered by dense natural vegetation and a large expanse of freshwater wetlands encompassing the majority of the lot as shown on the survey prepared by Jason D.Leadingham,Licensed Surveyor,of Scalice Land Surveying dated November 18,2021. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request'for a Variance from Article XXIII, Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's.November 22,2024 Notice of Disapprbval-based on an application for a permit to construct a new single- family dwelling; at; 1) located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 50 feet; located at: 9450 Main Bayview Road, Southold,NY. SCTM No. 1000-87-5-22. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance for the construction of anew single-family residence with a front yard setback of 30 feet where a minimum front yard setback of 50 feet is required. APPLICATION HISTORY: A prior application was submitted to the Zoning hoard of Appeals, file #7530 dated June 9, 2021, requesting'a front yard setback'of 19 feet where the code requires a minimum of 50 feet for the Page 2,July 24,2025 47992, Marra/9450 Main Bayview SCTM No. 1000-87-5-22 construction of a new single-family residence on a vacant parcel of land. This appeal was withdrawn by the applicant on April 20, 2023 and replaced with a new application, file#7804,which requested relief for a front yard setback of 20 feet where the code requires a minimum of 50 feet for the construction of a redesigned, proposed residence. A determination, denying the application, was rendered on August 21, 2023 in part based on the Town of Southold Trustees' transcript of their previous public hearings and their denials of wetland permits for the construction of a dwelling on the subject property. As evidenced by testimony in this application, there appears to be serious environmental concerns with this parcel. Southold Town Trustees transcripts from their hearings, and denial of wetland permits were given much consideration. The applicant now seeks relief from the Zoning Board of Appeals for a redesigned,two-story,single-family residence with a wetlands setback of 75 feet where the Town of Southold Board of Trustees indicated only during a pre-application site visit with the applicant,the need to have a minimum 80 feet wetlands setback to consider rehearing the application. Under the currently proposed wetlands setback of 75 feet,the applicant has to significantly reduce the size of the house and is still unable to fit the house into a conforming front setback of 50 feet. Thus,the requested non-conforming 30 foot front yard setback. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Testimony was offered that the history of this property has been consistently deemed unbuildable due to the wetlands on this parcel. Additionally, testimony was offered and not refuted that applicant purchased this parcel at a tax sale. Applicant did not include any evidence of how he obtained the property. Applicant is a builder on the North Fork and thus has or should have knowledge of the zoning,wetlands,and building codes. It is generally the practice on the North Fork that contracts for vacant land be subject to obtaining a building permit and other approvals. The applicant may not have done his due diligence in purchasing this property as he cannot obtain a building permit and other approvals due to the size and wetland constraints on the parcel. For this submission,the applicant provided architectural plans consisting of a proposed site plan,foundation(helical piles)and floor plans,along with elevations labeled SD-I through SD-4 prepared by Anthony M. Portillo,Registered Architect dated July 19,2024 and an analysis of six area homes with less than code conforming front yard setbacks. Included in this analysis are homes built prior to the adoption of Zoning by the Town of Southold in 1957 or those enlarged with additions and alterations. Those submissions were not for new construction and thus not conforming to the requirements of the current zoning regulations. The applicant, by way of a letter of introduction contained in the application, states: "9450 Main Bayview has site specific conditions that create design limitations.The property's total lot area is 53,596 square feet, although, about 24,578 square feet of this is the wetlands area. This leaves us with approximately 29,017 square feet of buildable area. When a previous application was presented before the Trustees at a pre-submission site visit, it was verbally communicated that the Trustees would accept 80 feet. However,this setback is not feasible given the site constraints. The overlapping front yard setback and wetlands setback leaves no room for the proposed construction if both setbacks are enforced simultaneously." In support of their application,and an attempt to show this property's setbacks would fit in with the character of the neighborhood,applicant provided several examples of Board relief, including, files: #4771 dated December 21, 1999 granting relief of a reduced front yard setback of 30 feet from a right of way on the eastside of the applicant's property. #7427 dated December 29,2020 granting relief of a reduced front yard setback of 35 from a right of way on the southside of the applicant's property. 47699 dated February 8,2024 denying relief sought for reduced setbacks and granting alternative relief. #7944 dated October 8,2024 granting amended relief for a reduced front yard setback of 25 feet. Regarding ZBA files 44771 and 47427 these neighboring properties are differentiated from the applicant's since both are accessed via a private right of way and not directly accessed via Main Bayview Road. While they share a physical address, the homes are located further back from the roadway than that proposed by the applicant and in one case, has another home directly in front of the not yet constructed residence that was granted relief. Similarly,file 97699 Page 3,July 24,2025 #7992, Marra/9450 Main Bayview SCTM No. 1000-87-5-22 is located at the tail end of a narrow private_roadway, which for the most part is a foot path to an association beach and not a roadway traversed by motorized vehicles. While file#7944 is the most similar in neighborhood character, the roadway in this case is a dead end, locally considered a tertiary road, servicing only residences in the Bay Shore community, unlike the applicant's location on Main Bayview Road a primary roadway servicing thousands of residents on the Hog Neck peninsula, which also offers access to Cedar Beach County Park. The previous files were very distinguishable from this property and the Board was not convinced of their likeness to homes keeping with the character in the neighborhood. The applicant included a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("NYSDEC") permit citing that the proposed construction is outside of the 100 feet from the DEC regulated freshwater wetlands and thus no DEC permit is required for this parcel. However, the Town of Southold Wetlands Code, as administered by the Southold Board of Trustees,still requires review and approval should relief be granted by the Board of Appeals. To date, there is no application pending with the Trustees. 1 Numerous letters and in person testimony at the public hearing in opposition to this application was received by the Board, including immediate neighbors and an attorney who was retained by an immediate neighbor to speak in opposition of the proposed construction on their behalf. Among the primary concerns were the severity of the flooding on the subject'property;the destruction of the existing thriving wetlands habitat for a variety of birds,plants and wildlife that the proposed construction would cause; and the adverse visual impact to the character of the neighborhood a dwelling so close to Main Bayview Road would cause. The Board recognizes they cannot base a decision on community opposition alone, the written and oral testimony by neighbors with actual knowledge of the conditions was corroborated by documentary evidence supplied to the Board. The June 5, 2025 public hearing was left open and adjourned to June 18, 2024 for the sole purpose of allowing the applicant to submit a written response to the public comments of opposition, along with comments from an environmental consultant, and examples of similar relief granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals for new construction in the immediate area. The application was further adjourned to July 10, 2025 for written public commentary in response to the applicant's submission. On June 16, 2025, the applicant provided information by Cole Environmental Services, in the form of a wetland project statement indicating that a variety of invasive species were found on the site and that remediation and replacement of the existing invasive vegetation with native plants would result in the ecological improvement of the subject property as a result of the proposed development.On June 18,2025, in opposition to that,the Board received written comments submitted by the neighbor's attorney from Dr. Ronald W. Abrams, CEP of Dru Associates Incorporated, who is the firm's principal ecologist. In that analysis, Dr. Abrams discussed the size of the wetlands on the subject lot;the health of the existing wetlands ecosystem;the adverse impact of future storm occurrences and the influence of a rise in sea level;the low ground water table connected with tidal action; limitations of the proposed dry wells and storm water mitigation given the environmental issues on the constrained site; and the substantial amount of required fill for the proposed construction. Dr. Abrams also highlighted various misrepresentations on the Environmental Assessment Form(EAF)submitted with the application including the significance of Corey Creek as a fish and wildlife habitat deemed very sensitive. The Board requested examples of new construction,thus under the requirements of the current Code,in the immediate area that had received similar variance relief. On June 17,2025 the applicant provided four(4)examples of homes in Southold Township that have received similar variance relief. These files are the same examples included in the initial application. On June 16,2025 the applicant's attorney submitted a written response to comments in opposition to the application citing the five state statutes the Zoning Board must consider in making a determination and stating that the proposed construction would not create an undesirable change in the character of the community or be a detriment.to Page 4,July 24,2025 #7992, Marra/9450 Main Bayview SCTM No. 1000-87-5-22 neighboring property owners;and, further argued for a broader view of a comparative analysis of examples of similar relief that are not within the immediate neighborhood. On July 9,2025,the adjacent neighbor's attorney submitted a written response analyzing the applicant's submission of examples of similar variance relief and concluded that none of the prior variances that were submitted could be used to support the subject application due to distant locations, different neighborhood characteristics, different zoning,different front yard setback characteristics,ground disturbance,water table,percolation and other significant physical and environmental conditions. The hearing was closed on July 10,2025. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on June 5,2025 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and a detriment to nearby properties. Main Bay View Road is among the longest and most traveled roadways located within the Town of Southold and has been developed over the course of nearly 400 years with lots of varying sizes and shapes and are developed with varied housing stock ranging from centuries old farm houses to modern residences. The majority of the residences either have conforming front yard setbacks or are pre-existing non-conforming because they were built prior to zoning. The vast majority are all built after the adoption of zoning. The development of the subject lot with a two-story dwelling on a foundation of piles that is proposed to be 30 feet from the front property line is not characteristic of the subject neighborhood. 2. Town Law U67-b(30)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance. The subject lot is heavily burdened with significant freshwater wetlands in the center and rear of the lot, which makes it impossible to conform to both the code-required fifty-foot minimum front yard setback and the code required minimum 100-foot wetlands setback. 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance requested herein is mathematically substantial,representing 40%relief from the code. The Board finds this a substantial deviation from the Code as well as a deviation from the environmental regulations. 4. Town Law U67-b(3)(b)(4). Evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. Comments about the subject application both in writing and at the hearing from adjacent neighbors familiar with the subject lot and an environmental expert, in addition to previous denials by both the Board of Trustees for wetlands permits and the Zoning Board of Appeals for a non-conforming front yard setback,all conclude that the development of this property will adversely affect the wetlands of the Town of Southold. Further,environmental regulations have become more stringent over the years to address the need to conserve water, land,wildlife habitat and address global warming. 5. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase especially in light of the fact the applicant is a local builder. Page 5,July 24,2025 47992, Marra/9450 Main Bayview SCTM No. 1000-87-5-22 6.Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief is not the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to build a dwelling with non-conforming front yard and wetlands setbacks, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B,motion was offered by Member Planamento,seconded by Member Lehnert,and duly carried, to DENY as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman(Chairperson),Planamento,Acampora,Lehnert and Steinbugler.(5-0) r � Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing 7 /a /2025 `LTE LAYOL NOTES, eceive r.. - - �,4 --- F I 1.THIS IS AN ARCHITECTS SITE PLAN IS '-� r - / - N I i.�. p SVB.IEGT TO VERIFICATIONTSSI BY A N 9 15 ED m' SURVEYOR. THE INPORMAnoN DEC 12OZ4 LIMIT5 of CLEARING, e .. I a REPRESENTED ON WIS SITE PLAN 15 TO THE GRADING AND GROUND ARCHITECTS BEST OP KKCK-Epee. eals tij DISTURBANCE d of ApP q/� PROP.IA ONSITE!r�F Ian 2.SURVEY lxE-oRMnnox was oerAlxm /�:�:: a 8n�� W FROM SURVEY DATED M5/202I ANo S60 0 eq)-., I\ WA$TEWA7ER GPA PROP.IAOW Op,o y i..-:. 2 V/ TREATMENT 5TEM 90ALlcE LAND SURVEYING � Fh, BEDROOM) P,691-95T-2400 PHOTO 3 °°' NEW PUBLIC TO al M. ` PHOTO``a3 �- WATER fy ED F FRE5HWATER m i 5 ` •� .�' i ONNEGTION PROP.ENTRSTOOF ` j•\\\\\\� ` BOUNDA AS DELIENATED `, \ , .�i MIhL W/4'X 6'O a F W BY EN- SULTANTS,INC.ON _4$0 `��`� _j��i NEW BURIED ELE i a3'a OGTOBER 51,2005 ♦ r '\ II' \ A, CONNECTION PHO/TO*4 :.i ■ '�'I����ll� P _ - / ``��„/ l ,� rl' r �C PROP.BURIED og =a .�I ♦` ```�. 0 2 PROPANE TANK g : ! �� f `� / �• � � .�i , � �—PHOTO PROP. �/ 1O I �y U� I / GRAVEL �o•,.r :::::::::�::::::::::::.` 8 DRIVE. h�� / 98, 6 ,� 'b/H../ ✓ Inooss PROP. �� O l :::bQIH5iiii:i::�E:.. % DWELLING $o,F�P -' •? 3 `V/ ` ::::::::::::::::::::::::::�:::�::::::::: % \♦ / ,9\ PROPOSED / L o ° pj I ♦ RO C` DWELLINGTEST ^ �pd �� ry� `♦ HOLE vi ^ \ i y y h ♦e' \ 2 Q2 / t� Q alu ° 0� z 2 �, / o . A ♦• `.....YVE7`likNDS Eiiii::::iiii:i:iiEEE[EiEi:° s ;-V� m�Q,,y0 iii:.`.iiiiiiiiiii::iiiiiiii:iiiiiiiiiF U .::::::::::: ............. .............. ENLARGED PROPOSED 51 A r o - W ♦ --ctT�iist; - - a Lor '-O' �C SCALE.I'_20 yA IOT, �-C Q J p��' .... r • _ -.i. t .�r•:<s,:, f� to mZ o.... ... -TOWNB x W _H ar a sP. asvw r'x wP• noo-eresa ,crsia i Kaw Ix roai sr. opur sP. yw rmA Q O U ra:rtaoc srs vcsv�or scmo sP. ^Z •- 0� rout wr•v w xsnuwum aamrw sr. sou mrmas olsiwcr we xox ccasow•uxs �caoo w ro s> sP. ................................ ..................... o..................................................... h,ry �nrusw a '"`a° w.'PTss'��a�r �aoc sr. ur:r sP. syn sP. Ixv,sr. LL Z a 'aO �V 90UMWDf!TLODE inuza lBl'1 _.'.'3".:2".>` {�h rrrw TiLGD Zm,. x SOWl�FECUJ.lTa18 rn8Lm6 h,i� `' p' b��'i"4)1. Rr pEP M FOOrtcx 7 vow 2 4NID9 Gb RLT rnmwe 90 RGLD OM{q�>LO�4y 4 [ ��/ - �' p -'Y). ::: rrn i Icr u�w 69S'�d�9P. OFL iwcr H° .-_ .._ .•wmP. cwri.� I \rO O�� A �� P� CO /`Syl�<O� O.O�y.. ronu eunv.eie.eww —A sn q66 `}�Y� r �/rs .. rncra�w+��xs eaisP. �xs :.i&. :�ti+:..i:��6ti-�:'�v>;:,ze.'x•i:a.:�• ay.��:wr.! woais�rirm wn +� 2 'ifY '�'!yn l J ou "nwT^'se wwew �/O rait.vm�or wu snag nar sr. va r,vsr r�aoaaw wa sP. en nw' N ���.��-�� � n Q wx.rawn rww eso s rTs m w+m+,r,or rosw.r ,u,a.m�soe r�wra rleaR�.. wsr. wwuanan+�arcw ma �:alY'» res J� "-; .•rj �, P991-05ED SITE PLAN SCALE,r=so'o° oeemw ,�� 0r1 0�`� < a Y Y - r yl '� • � -' o �. � :'�'�,a.....a i r. R i r�,q�,.'�� +fir.+ •�' 16 ,� '�� � At AW ji .rot �. A j.; A:•u n a. A rre�. MgIN xsz .• �sa•.� tit � r .. osx.oe 1 a ♦ ,ad♦ �'a O➢ , 7 n[ y� , I . z a A '"',P,,,.; '♦i �?_+ter: e k\61 17 3> 'v°�� r9 J. :X ,�n.x•� son a WW1 2 �r a 0.lN-ZO •A �'+! � 6EE BEC M-24 3y �Tei♦ t O ,a .� - �'�'if.� 3�1 v'iJW$�,",,� "� -.N 3 � nx �wW OF SIX:.+C1C 1, �lr': x91 x1 1 M 9i 11xk.1 , .� _'• TIE r.NEeT B(%RN0.0 ,' 5 �,'• r* ,s zaa xS4..1 A ♦ 9,r j a �mww..w gy.�` tk zenRi „ r,' 'i` �� a ♦�'�, rov:N os sournoln _... �. ;, �. � i �µct e,, 4 It . ♦at.:�«� •G'�+' s 4 ♦wt�iey�♦.�E .e.u.i a t'f ,�'U .: •+lxl I J F � ', t 1)1. ..a-. ',a S A- w l- e9 b � '9 � — 1V%! F '. ..H,kl `_ .wA S�N ',Y , d $ �F'...s+,i >•''�A � x ! -... +__`.Y � ..\ ,h. �.r a /3. ��--1+'rlma N e; „�+so�,'.9 N '.�.s � -.i;• •e-. (q� �.f sue) i °^-.._._..:..x_T' r ' S ;+rB..�,r W p • a. 'x. � .... °ow�dC" ,,... �,,g'.x'1 � 2. aw !' � ..' " �' i 1Ypyt4, x� u` ,� «•�'A, k �� � alb"' j' ' 1" ' ♦. 'i F:. �.• k4+ •'fit�� ♦ �a .° eT �w1 j: nw F D.28 l D 43 «. CNraiCt ...,_ g 9oRN' b 1, `5♦ PD 711 ...... ..,., Ar 0.� r d ' _ 121 __ eowm v suErtNx rroc nccx Im eAv �E M •.•. -y"...u,•- — ..,._ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK U N N TCE 087 E /, �a p ��_ __ �q..•w ¢__. _ ....•_ — �. Real PruperlyT><3emce ARrncy uEon v E 1ea—_ —.—— r _ ___ W xor n¢ app/11p1O v.w i •y� N iw� crvx�__ _ r'•' ..aww ^e dip t rrry Pm•,Ibm.MW.1'NWI s mnB1E0 N h�rglRm:n V AW RNl ' w SIFFtxN c(eAary TAa Nw r rovllP p vw. r:wv___a__ .'•" —___ ...._...�., /11) ..row... d' ,. xmqur vnm*e+1ewlsolri r� p ' � -- S OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Telephone: 631 765-1938 Southold, NY 11971 � cou LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Glenn Goldsmith, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Cc: Honorable Lori Hulse, Attorney From: Heather Lanza, AICP, Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Date: March 9, 2026 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW, LLC, SCTM# 1000-87.-5-22 This application is to construct a 17'x4l' (672.7 sq. ft. footprint) single-family two-story dwelling with 4'x6' entry steps with landing on 10"x10" concrete piers upon helical piles (20 total) with Azek Break-Away walls; install an I/A OWTS sanitary system at front/side of property; install a 560 sq. ft. driveway; install (1) 6'x'4' deep drywell and (1) 6'x5' deep drywell at front and side of property; install (1) 1,000 gallon propane tank buried at front of property; and install underground utilities to dwelling. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter §268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the policies of the LWRP as follows: Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold's ecosystem. 6.3. Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction. D. Provide adequate buffers between wetlands and adjacent or nearby uses and activities in order to ensure protection of the wetland's character, quality, values, and functions. The proposed work does not meet the setback requirements from a wetland, beach or bank as defined in Chapter §275-2 Definition; word usage and §275-3 Findings; purpose;jurisdiction; setbacks. D. Setbacks. (1) The following minimum setbacks apply to any and all operations proposed on residential property within the jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees: (a) Wetland boundary or bank. [1]Residence: 100ft Given that the proposed residence is within 50' of the wetland boundary, it does not meet the minimum setback requirements. If the proposed work is permitted, a permanent non-disturbance buffer should be established between the residence and the wetlands. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter §268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. p i OU Michael J.Domino,President S SO�� f/f©l Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President 4 < 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski CA r� aril' Telephone(631) 765-1892 Greg Williams �� � ,{ Fax(631) 765-6641 C oul 1 mI�,_ Y BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD This Section For Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit Amendment/Transfer/Extension Received Application: I �y -AReceived Fee: $ 1 --Completed Application: Incomplete: SEQRA Classification: Type I Type-II Unlisted Negative Dec. Positive Dec. Lead Agency Determination Date: Coordination:(date sent): =LWRP Consistency Ass ssment Form Sent: CAC Referral Sent: Date of Inspection: Receipt of CAC Report: NI Ir — —y— Technical Review: �r- Ida E�p k, — `0 Public Hearing Held: Resolution: y �.,.�t Owner(s)Legal Name of Property (as shown on Deed): 9450 Main Ba hold Toadyview LLC, Mailing Address: 8 Ransom Avenue,Sea Cliff,NY 11579 Phone Number: 646-343-7400 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 87-5-22 Property Location: 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW RD SOUTHOLD NY 11971 (If necessary, provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT(If applicable): AMP ARCHITECTURE Mailing Address: 10200 MAIN RD UNIT 3A,MATTITUCK,NY 11952 Phone Number: 516-214-0160 C 1 AMP Architecture Address:10200 Main Road,Unit 3A,Mattituck NY 11952 Phone: (516)214-0160 Design + Build i November 17, 2025 Wetlands Permit Application Marra Residence 9450 Main Bayview Southold, N.Y. 11971 SCTM: 1000-87-05-22 Project Description: New 2 Story Dwelling with Full Basement: Proposed 2 Story Dwelling: 17'X41' (672.7SF) Proposed Entry Steps and Landing:4'X6' (24'SF) Proposed Foundation: 10"x10" Conc. Piers upon helical piles (20 Total) with Azek Break-Away Walls New IA OWTS: Buried at front/side of property New Gravel Driveway: 560 SF New Buried Drywells: (1) 6'x4' deep Drywell & (1) 6'x5' deep Drywell—located at front and side of property New Buried Propane Tank: (1) 1,000 gallon tank buried at front of property New Buried Utility Connections: At front of property 1 Page Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): 53,596.2 SQUARE FEET Area Zoning: AC NON-CONFORMING Previous use of property: . VACANT LOT Intended use of property: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes X No If"Yes", please provide a copy. Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? X Yes No If"Yes", be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? X Yes No If"Yes",please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? Yes X No Does the structure (s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? Yes X No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date N/A X No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED Project Description (use attachments if necessary): Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED Area of wetlands on lot:_ 24578.8 square feet Percent coverage of lot: 2.5 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: NSA feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 50 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No x Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? 1,400 cubic yards -for new IA system and buried propane tank How much material will be filled? 700 cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: 7 feet -for new IA system and buried propane tank. Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: 6% Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: SMALL BACKHOE WILL BE USED TO DIG FOR GRADE BEAMS,IA SYSTEM AND PROPANE TANK. EXCESS FILL WILL BE TRUCKED OFF SITE. Statement of the effect, if any,on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED AREA OF CONSTRUCTION. 617.20 Appendix S Short Environmental Assessment Form .Instructions for C'omMetina Part 1 -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: MARRA RESIDENCE Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW RD,SOUTHOLD NY 11971 Brief Description of Proposed Action: -NEW PROPOSED 2 STORY WOOD FRAME,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE,WITH PARTIAL CANTILEVER OF HOUSE -NEW PROPOSED ENTRY STEPS AND LANDING - PROPOSED IA SYSTEM AND BUREID PROPANE TANK IN FRONT YARD Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 516-214-0160 AMP ARCHITECTURE E-Mail: aportillo@amparchitect.co Address: 10200 MAIN RD UNIT 3A City/PO: State: Zip Code: MATTITUCK NY 11952 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Pail 2. If no,continue to question 2. El FX1 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: ❑ M 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 1.2 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? .016—acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 1'2 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) [:]Industrial ❑Commercial INResidential(suburban) El Forest ❑Agriculture E]Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES ' N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ M ❑ b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ M ❑ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ❑ X❑ 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: E ❑ 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES a ❑ b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑ c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or,near site of the proposed action? E ❑ 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: ❑ 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ ❑ 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? ❑ ❑ b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? El I X 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ ❑ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑ ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban ®Suburban i 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats, listed - NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? ❑ ❑ 16. Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES X 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO I YES If Yes, ❑ ❑ a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ®,NO DYES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO ©YES GUTTER SYSTEMS WILL BE INSTALLED. Page 2 of 4 i 18. Does the proposed action include consfruction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: ❑ ❑ 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: FRI ❑ I 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: Z ❑ AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE 1 Applicant/sponsor name: P ARCHITECTURE,ANTHONY PORTILLO Date: k z 1 24 IV) Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the,following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part I and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur I. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning ❑ ❑ regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? ❑ 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the ❑ El of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? S. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic at- affect ❑ ❑ existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use ofenergy and it fails to incorporate ❑ ❑ reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: ❑ ❑ a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? ❑ 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, ❑ ❑ architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, ❑ Elwaterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage a ❑ problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential.impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-terrn Jon g-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Town of Southold-Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date President Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 Board of Trustees Application AFFIDAVIT Daniel Marra; 9450 Main Bayview LLC BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE. TRUSTEES,THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES, INCLUDING THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL,TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, INCLUDING A FINAL INSPECTION. I FURTHER AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY AND AS REQUIRED TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY CONDITION OF ANY WETLAND OR COASTAL EROSION PERMIT ISSUED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES DURING THE TERM OF THE PERMIT. Signature of Property Owner Signature of Property Owner SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 'V)CC�mY0er 20 25 ( DARCEE AUFFENANGER \ NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK Registration No. 01AU0019644 ry Public Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires January 9,2028 Board of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicantis not the owner) I/We, Daniel Marra owners of the roe identified as SCTM# 1000-. 87-5-22 _,in the town of property rtY Southold - ..:,,New York,hereby authorizes' ,--Qd Environmental Services -,,-_.,,to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s)from the Southold Town Board of Trustees for this property. Property Owner's Signature Property Owner's Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS .[( ---,--.,DAY OF �t-I��.._ ,�20 _ Notary Public CHRISTOPHER B BONDARCHIIK NOTARY PUBLIC''"STATF nF NFW YORK Registration No 01ROM39944 Qualified in Suffolk Nq M%Cummisa+on Fxpire.,, „� .' . r Board of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) I/We Daniel Marra; 9450 Main Bayview LLC owners of the property identified as SCTM# 1000- 87-5-22 in the town of Southold ,New York,hereby authorizes AMP Architecture to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s)from the Southold Town Board of Trustees for this property. Property Owner's Signature Property Owner's Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS. 2 DAY OF 1�eCern�O�� 20_Z :5_ DARCEF AUFENANGER ® NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK Registration No. 01 A00019644 ary Public Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires Jan,iary 9, 2028 t APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATNE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts o£intcrest on the part of town officers and employees The guryose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts�ofinterest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary.toavoid same. YOUR NAME: ANTHONY PORTILLO (Last name,first name,griddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF AP)LICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee X Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other",name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or-child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,tgarriage,or business interest"Business interest"means-a business, including a partnership,in which the townofticer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a.corporation in which the town officer or employee awns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold. Title or position of that person . Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); 13)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this y Of >Cef-n r 20� Signature - — Print Name ANTAW PORTILLO Form TS 1 APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTA.TIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town ofSouthold's Code of Ethics whibits conflicts of interest-on the'nart of town officers and emnloyms.The nurpose_of this farm is to tifovidc information which can alert the-town ofpossiblc conflicts of mterestand allow it to take whatever action.is necessary to avoid same. YOURNAME• _ Daniel Marra-, 9450 Main Bayview LLC (Last name,first name,iriddle initial,unless you are applying fit the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate:the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other'',name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sililing;parent,or child)have a relationship•with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,rgarriage,or business interesL"Business interest''means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agrnt/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate,line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP l Submitted this Z 3 day of t" b 20925 Signature Print Name Xp2ril Form TS I f Board of Trustees Applicat L PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS APPLICATION NAME & SCTM#: NAME: ADDRESS: ck-c-e-/j- y /3 3 a STATE OF NEW YORr, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK , residing at , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of , 20 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office located at , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Signature Sworn to before me this Day of 120 Notary Public Board of Trustees Application PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS APPLICATION NAME & SCTM#: kS —,5- 2—2— NAME: ADDRESS: qq CH4--,O KANY� T'70 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK , residing at 1C)lam'LIC) MCUA �� )l k' O'AV6-� LL I G z , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the_ day of MCJ\YG\/\ , 20 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that d_2 said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office located at dJ(j , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAILIRETURN RECEIPT. tea. Signature Sworn to before me this 14 Day of 20 a(, CHRISTOPHER B BONDARCHIIK NOTARY PUftUC STATF OF NFW YORK Registration No 01 B(003RQ" L ;^4 Qualified inuffo Slk C)un Y Ito Notary bllc M%Commission Expires rq rU ra rq �Majl Certified Mail Fee CID � C` r- $ xtra Servis ees(checkbox,add tee as appropriate) (')J Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee as appropriate) ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ '' ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ _' Postmark ® ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ Postmark Q ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ Here Q ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ -^ Here d ❑Adult Signature Required $ LJ ❑Adult Signature Required $ Q []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ '" Q [:]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Q Postage Q Postage Ir $ tT $ Q Total Postage and Fees M Total Postage and Fees Q $ Q $ nt To S�Jt/a!1_ .No.o B C _�_S��Yy --------- Q SentT 57 ��✓!J " �r n ---- ---- Street an�__pJ -,A _ ---------------------------------------------- Q StreeP and Apt. o.,or PO B o City State IP+40 Cit, tate,ZIP+4® s p ® o ® e IJ ®® ® rU ®e M LJ I Ln i v r Certified Mail Fee d7 Certified Mail Fee ro $ io ri8te rU Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee as appropriate) R j Gxtra Services&Fees(check box,add fee as a—Ap A ) ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ Postmark Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ Postmark Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ - - - jl Here Q ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ Her [� ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $____-,.,-,— ❑Adult Signature Req Q ❑Adult Signature Required $ _ Q uired $ _ .. d ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Q []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Postage Q Postage ® rr $ Q Total Postage and Fees Q Total Postage and Fees Q S n�To G Sent To1� t,� n 1 i �( 1 � b ru ---------- ------- ------------ rll __ __ StreetandA t. o. or PO oxNo. ® SPr tan A .No.,or P o No Q A. g� of r`- fit✓__ _l G t --------------- ----------------------- Clty, City,State,ZIP+4® e 1 l e ell•e 1 e e 1 . 1 1 111'1 B Ili ®e e { rq Certified Mall Fee rU Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee as approptlate)- ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ postmark Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ .. Q ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ Mere Q ❑Adult Signature Required $ Q ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ — Q Postage Er $ Cl Total postage and Fees Q SI eet id Apt.No.,or O Box No. :1 e 1 Iv"4 1 ILVi 111 s ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. • - , ■ Print your name and address on the reverse A Signature so that we can return the card to you. X ��� ❑A ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, gent or on the front if space permits. 13 Received (Printed Name Addressee C. Date of Delivery t, �Ar�ti/cl�e Addressed to: �"` yl i j� " D. If YES,enter deliveryi ad'dr from item 1? E3 Yes '�" _ address belows I'll", I� I�1111111111111111111111111 O 3, Service Type II ❑Adult Signature ❑Priority Mall Express® kz 95�11�94Q2 � 7 ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered MailTm w., 3 5002 6226 43 ❑Certified Mail( ry ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery Delivery °�IrIP Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery ry ❑Signature ConfirmationTm 0 2 0 0 0 p ❑collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 1 0000 2?81 5652 >ured Mail tY Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 lured Mail Restricted Delivery er$500) P9mestic Return Receipt I t SENDER: • •N COMPLETE THIS SECTIONON ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. " ;q A. i9 a I ■ Prltnt your name and address on the revs X ❑Agent sIi'44 'we can return't(ie card to.you. C]Addressee ■ Attach"fhis'card to the'back of the mailpiece, B. ceived by(Printed Name) C. Date De ve or on the front if space permits. CU vS ,�n 3 2 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? Ye t n— , r -)L\;Y,�, If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No .suv" ( � ILinI Il f llllll IIII III I III I II I lil l 11 Ill l 11 I II I I I�II 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express( ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MaIITM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted 9590 9402 9373 5002 6226 74 ❑certified Mail( Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmatlonTM ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation °rririn Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery 7020 0090 0000 2781 5614 0 Insured Mail 'ad d Mail Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000.9053 Domestic Return Receipt , AMP Architecture Address:10200 Main Road,Unit 3A,Mattituck NY 11952 Phone:(631)603-9092 Design + Build Marra-9450 Main Bayview LLC Trustees Hearing 9450 Main Bayview Rd,Southold SCTM: 1000-87-5-22 1000-87.-S-24 Mary Kirsch PO Box 668 Mattituck, NY 11952 1000-87.-S-25 Charles V. Salice &Camille Passaro 9326 Main Bayview Rd Southold,NY 11971 1000-88.-3-20 Isaac&Ashley Itenberg 9325 Main Bayview Rd Southold,NY 11971 1000-88.-3-1 Jan Szczecina &Anna Gawrys 47 Svea Ave Clifton,NJ 07013 1000-87.-5-21-14 Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 :� a Io11 is%;'1♦' Glenn Goldsmith,President � St1FFOtq Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski, Vice President � G t` 54375 Route 25 Y'a� y.+ Eric Sepenoski d ` = P.O. Box 1179 x Liz Gillooly '' Southold,NY 11971 Joseph Finora IN! Telephone(631)765-1892 z Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW, LLC COUNTY OF SUFFOLK MAR 1 STATE OF NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING '` DO NOT COMPLETE THIS FORM UNTIL THE POSTING HAS REMAINED IN PLACE FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE— COMPLETE THIS FORM ON EIGHTH DAY OR LATER I, p C �r � residing at/dba �ACA-b.V OX t������� being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the C( day of Mayeyy , 202&, I personally posted the property known as qH WWI �� N�elvu\ `- C& `Yk )bc1 NL4 l l q- I by placing the Board of Trustees official noticing poster where it can easily be seen from the street, and that I have checked to be sure the noticing poster has remained in place for a full seven days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday, March 18, 2026. Dated: /l-712 signature) Sworn to before me this 1 } day of Mar 20,2 CHRISTOPHER B BONDARCHLIK VOTARY PUBLIC STATF nF VFW YORK Registration S 01 RQOOj Qualified in Suffolk Countsnt\ Notary bllc M Commission Expires nna.�r?9 &s �# } �•,�.a tom' Y r f ` ,, �AV P!. orW t O" tr s s oW fig to i �Mi 11 tl j{��! �� ` � pill a t � r ,, r, al , AT M AI V l� A ' JWZ Ir- f , f > �� -4 J40 << } w ¢ k t f� a Ys# �4^ ply IV- s $ R .� qA , � _, ,- ., 1�. e �^ v„,�'"'� e•,�s * t may. �� �� t a` y r 6 m sd 'ASS, fi a f f F t f ,d � Y Y Yy 3� x �- b NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW LLC SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING: For a Wetland Permit to construct a 17'x41' (672.7sq.ft. footprint) single-family two-story dwelling with 4'x6' entry steps with landing on 10"x10" concrete piers upon helical piles (20 total) with Azek Break-Away walls; install an I/A OWTS sanitary system at front/side of property; install a 560sq.ft. driveway; install (1) 6'x'4' deep drywell and (1) 6'x5' deep drywell at front and side of property; install (1) 1,000 gallon propane tank buried at front of property; and install underground utilities to dwelling. Located: 9450 Main Bayview Road, Southold. SCTM# 1000-87-5-22 TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Wednesday, March 18, 2026 — at or about 5:30P.M. If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available online at www.southoldtownny.gov and/or in the Trustee Office until to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES *TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated. as to its significant. beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which.includes-all of Southold Town). 3: If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be exylainW in detail,.listing both Mnorting and non- supporting-facts. 'If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website(southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. ' DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 87 - s _ 22 PROJECT NAME MARRA RESIDENCE The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees ❑ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) ❑ (b) . Financial assistance(e.g.grant, loan,subsidy) (c) Permit,approval, license,certification: ❑ Nature and extent of action: NEW 2 STORY_SINGEL FAMILY RESIDENCE (REAR PORTION OF HOUSE CENTILEVER FROM HELICAL PILES) NEW PROPOSED FRONT ENTRY LANDING AND STAIR Location of action: 1.2 ACRES 9450 MAIN BAYVIEW RD,SOUTHOLD NY 11971 Site acreage:_ _ Present land use: VACANT LOT Present zoning classification: AC NON-CONFORMING 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: AMP ARCHITECTURE (b) Mailing address: 10200 MAIN RD UNIT 3A,MATTITUCK NY 11952 ` (c) Telephone number: Area Code( j 516-214-0160 (d) Application number,if any:. Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No 0 If yes,which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation_ criteria. D Yes D No ❑ Not Applicable WE REVISED THE EXISITNG HOME BASED ON COMMENTS WE RECIEVED AT A PREVIOUS TRUSTEES HEARINGS. THE DESIGN MAINTAINS THE COMMUNITY CHARACTER,AND PRESERVES OPEN SPACE. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable 1 � THERE ARE NO HISTORICAL OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ON THIS PROPERTY. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No Q Not Applicable THE PROPOSED NEW BUILD WOULD NOT AFFECT THE VISUAL QUALITY QR SCENIC RESC)IIRCES Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages S through 16 for evaluation criteria 1 1 ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable THE PROPOSED HOUSE WILL BE BUILT TO THE LATEST IRC CODES AND LOCAL TOWN CODES. ALL ROOF AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WILL BE CONNECTED TO NEW DRYWELLS TO CATCH RAIN WATER. NEW IA OWTS SYSTEM WILL BE INSALLED AS OPPQSED TO A TRADITIONA.I SYSTEM Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy S.) Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of.Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes ❑ No Cl Not Applicable ALL STORM WATER RUNOFF CREATED BY NEW CONSTRUCTION WII I BE rONT-RO T ED Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ ❑ Yes No Not Applicable THE PROPOSED AREA OF THE NEW BUILD IS LOCATED BEFORE THE WETLANDS. NO CONSTRUCTION WILL BE OCCURING OR INTERRUPTING COASTAL FISH AND WILDLIFE. ALSO,DURING CONSTRUCTION.SILT FENCING AND HAYBALES WILL BE USED TO CONTROL DEBRIS. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — PoIicies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No' Not Applicable PROPOSED WORK WILL NOT AFFECT AIR QUALITY. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable ALL WASTE WILL BE CONTROLLED AND ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRI WILL BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. 0 YeF-1 No 0 Not Applicable J THIS IS A PRIVATE PROPERTY THAT HAS NO PUBLIC ACCESS. IT WILL NOT AFFECT PUBLIC SPACES, OR ITS NEIGHBORS. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III•—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. F Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable NEW PROPSED 2 STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ARE LOCATED ON A PRIVATE SITE. IT WILL NOT AFFECT NATURAL SHORELINE OR WATER AREAS. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. El Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable RAIN WATER WILL BE CAUGHT AND CONTROLLED AND PERVIOUS MATERIALS WILL BE UTILIZED AT SITE TO MINIMIZE WATER FLOW. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies; Pages ;62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable PREPARED BY AMP ARCHITECTURE TITLE ' DATE