Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-83.-1-36.1
OFFICE LOCATION: `$ � ;. MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex .-N �� P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 9 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) u,; e Telephone: 631 765-193 8 Southold, NY 11971 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Date March 27,2025 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref JOSEPH CHARLES CASARONA TRUST #7995 SCTM# 1000-83-1-36.1. JOSEPH CHARLES CASARONA TRUST#7995 -Request for Variances from Article XXII, Section 280- 116A(1); Article XXIII, Section 280-124;Article XXXVI, Section 280-207A(b);and the Building Inspector's October 15,2024,Amended November 14, 2024,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a new single family dwelling and an accessory in-ground swimming pool; at 1) less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 40 feet; 2)located less than the code required 100 feet from the top of the bluff; 3)gross floor area exceeding permitted maximum square footage for lot containing up to 20,000 square feet in area; located at: 55 Glen Court, (Adj.to the Long Island Sound) Cutchogue. SCTM No. 1000-83-1-36.1. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the action is INCONSISTENT with the below listed Policy Standard and therefore is INCONSISTENT with LWRP. Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. 1. The structure within this area should be minimized due to repetitive loss from storm damage, including hurricane winds. 2. It is recommended that the board consider the existing home sizes in the neighborhood and the request for an addition of 547.25 square feet of floor area,which exceeds the allowed amount under the Town Code. Pursuant to Chapter 268,the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Paul DeChance,Town Attorney BOARD MEMBERS :�oOf-So UI,yO Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 53095 Main Road • P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora G ` Office Location: Eric Dames Off '`' Town Annex/First Floor Robert Lehnert,Jr. 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 December 17, 2024 RECEIVED' Mark Terry, Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Ir Planning Board OfficeTown of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. # 7995 —Joseph Charles Casarona Trust Dear Sir or Madam: We have received an application construct new single family dwelling and accessory inground swimming pool. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280(Zoning Code),and survey map,project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-51) is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairperson By: � .eyv.�� Encl. Site Plan/survey: JM2 Architecture PC, last dated November 19, 2024 Public Hearing Date: April 3, 2024 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I qq f� BUILDING DEPARTMENT C J SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE:August 6,2024 RENEWED: October 15,2024 AMENDED: October 15,2024 AMENDED: November 14,2024 TO: Robert E. Herrmann(Casarona) 1319 North Sea Road Southampton,NY 11968 Please take notice that your application dated January 17,2024: For permit:to construct a new single-family dwelling and an accessory in-ground swimming pool at: Location of property: 55 Glen Court,Cutchogue,NY County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 83 Block 1 Lot 36.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed single-family dwelling,on this nonconforming 25,308.36 sq.ft.lot(18,382 sq.ft.buildable land)in the R-40 District,is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 280-124,which states lots measuring 20,000-39,999 square feet in total size require a front yard setback of 40 feet. The proposed front yard setback is 25 feet. Additionally,the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXXVI Section 280-207A(b) which states:"the gross floor area shall not exceed the permitted square footage calculated as follows:Lots containing up to 20,000 square feet of lot area:2,100 square feet maximum plus 12.5%of the lot area in excess of 10,000 sq.ft. up to a total of 3,350 sq.ft.maximum." The permitted gross floor area is 3,147.75 sq.ft. The proposed gross floor area is 3,695 sq.ft. Lastly,the proposed accessory swimming pool is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII Section 280- 116A(1),which states:"All buildings or structures located on lots upon which there exists a bluff landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than 100 feet from the top of such bluff. The pool is located at 82 feet from the top of bluff. The Notice of Disapproval has been amended to reflect the requested change by the applicant. 4 - Authorize Signa ure Note to Applicant:Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A. ! T SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OFFICE CHECK LIST Please submit the following in NINE Sets collated into separate packets,with ORIGINAL signed set and Check for filing fee clipped on top: CURRENT NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL(for area variance, use variance,and waiver of lot merger applications) Note: Special Exception Permit applications come directly to the ZBA and do not require a Notice of Disapproval) 1.Application(2 pages) Attached(plus 5 page addendum) 2.Project description Form Attached 3.Questionnaire Attached 4. Pre-CO's,CO's,all prior ZBA decisions N/A 5.AG Data Form,all applications.If not AG answer 1-8 Attached 6.Short EAF Form(4 pgs) Attached 7.Owner's Consent Attached 8.Transactional Owner and Agent Attached 9. LWRP Form,all applications.If not waterfront complete first two pages Attached 10.Photos Attached 11.New Survey Attached 12.Building Plans Attached 13.Town Property Card Attached **CHECK is payable to TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: call 766-1809 APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No. 55 Street Glen Court Hamlet Cutchogue SCTM 1000 Section: 83 Block: 1 Lot(s) 36.1 Lot Size: 25,293 sf Zone R-40 I(WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED 11/14/24 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 3/15/24 Owner(s): The Joseph Charles Casarona Trust Mailing Address: Joseph Casarona, Trustee, PO Box 1149, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Telephone: 347-888-7844 Fax: Email:jasarona@mac.com NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent, architect,builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative:En-Consultants for 0 Owner( ) Other: Address: 1319 North Sea Road, Southampton, NY 11968 Telephone: 631-283-6360 Fax: 631-283-6136 Email:rherrmann@enconsultants.com Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), 0 Authorized Representative, ( )Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 3/15/24 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 1/17/24 FOR: Building Permit ( )Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( )Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( )Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article:xxlll /xxxvl /xxll Section: 280/280/280 Subsection:124(B)/207(A)/116(A) Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: (Jj A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Request for Reversal or Overturn the Zoning Officer's Denial Other A prior appeal( )has, (,4 has not been made at any time with respect to this Property, UNDER Appeal No(s). Year(s). (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance) Page 2, Area Variance Application Revised 6/2023 REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific,additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature notarized): 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: See attached addendum. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance,because: See attached addendum. 3.The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: See attached addendum. 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: See attached addendum. 5. Has the alleged difficulty been self created? { } Yes,or jvj No Why: See attached addendum. • Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? W No { } Yes(please furnish a copy) • This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. By signing this document,the PROPERTY OWNER understands that pursuant to Chapter 280- 146(B)of the Code of the Town of Southold,any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured,and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three(3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board may, upon written request prior to the date of expiration,grant an extension not to exceed three(3)consecutive one(1)year terms. IT IS THE PROPERTY OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE COMP NCE WITH THE CODE REQUIRED TIME FRAME DESCRIBED HEREIN. Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Robert E. Herrmann Sworn to before me this 10th day Coastal Management Specialist of D c ber , 2024 KIM H. STEPHENS Notary Public-State of New York Notary Nblic No.01ST5015931 Qualified in Suffolk County �S My Commission Expires August 02,20_ THE JOSEPH CHARLES CASARONA TRUST 55 GLEN COURT CUTCHOGUE,NY SCTM#1000-83-1-36.1 1. The subject property, originally created as Lot 1 of the Map of Birch Hills, a 1967 Town-approved subdivision, is the westernmost of 10 preexisting undersized,residentially developable parcels fronting Long Island Sound and its associated steeply sloped bluffs on the north side of Glen Court, all of which were created in the late 1960s by the subdivision Maps of Birch Hills or Vista Bluff. All of the parcels that are developed contain structures that were constructed, reconstructed, or in some way altered prior to one or more current zoning regulations and/or pursuant to variance relief granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals. As a result,each is characterized by structures located nonconforming distances from the top of bluff and/or front lot line that are similar to those proposed by the applicant. For example, prior to adoption of the required bluff setback, the Board in 1976 granted relief necessary to construct a new dwelling at 255 Glen Court (2 parcels to the east) with a 25-foot front yard setback (Case 2134); and in 1979 granted relief necessary to construct a new dwelling with a 15-foot front yard setback (Case 2644) at 995 Glen Court (9 parcels to the east), where a 20-foot front yard setback was subsequently granted for as-built alterations in 2008 (Case 6166). More recently, the Board in 2015 granted relief at 445 Glen Court(4 parcels to the east) necessary to construct anew dwelling with a 25-foot front yard setback and a swimming pool with a 50-foot bluff setback(Case 6865). The proposed dwelling's 25-ft setback from the front lot line is thus equal to, or greater than, the setbacks approved by the Board in all three cases. The dwelling would also be the first on Glen Court to meet the 100-foot bluff setback. The small 250 sf"plunge pool" type swimming pool is smaller in area than that approved in Case 6865, and its 82-ft setback from the bluff is significantly greater than the 50-ft pool setback approved in that case. There are also larger swimming pools situated between the top of bluff and homes on the two adjacent parcels to the west. The pool located immediately to the west, which was constructed pursuant to bluff setback relief granted in 2001 (Case 4990), appears to be positioned approximately the same distance from the bluff as the proposed. When considering potential impacts of the setback relief on nearby properties, it must be noted that in addition to its commonality with the soundfront parcels to the east, the subject parcel is unique in its size and relationship to Glen Court. Specifically,the parcel is not positioned entirely to the north of the roadway but to the west of its westerly terminus because in 1997 the Town Planning Board approved the merger of the most westerly 100 feet of Glen Court with the subject parcel, thus increasing the parcel's depth by 50 feet and its buildable area by 5,000 square feet. Therefore,with respect to its front yard setback,the dwelling would not be positioned 25 feet from the publicly traveled roadway, as is the case with the above referenced variance determinations,but from the property line shared with the developed residential parcel to the south. And the dwelling on that property is located more than 70 feet from the same property line and owned under single and separate title but also by the applicant's family. As noted above, the proposed swimming pool would be located roughly in line with the adjacent pool to the west; and the adjacent property to the east is vacant. Robert . Herrmann Sworn to before me this 10`h day of December, 2024 n H. eSyb c Notary Public-State New No.01 ST5015931 Page I 1 Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission Expires August 02,0�5 When considering the request for 3,695 sf GFA, 547 sf more than allowed by the parcel's buildable land area, the project architect considered the 5 nearest soundfront parcels on Glen Court to the east and the two larger adjacent soundfront parcels on Oregon Road to the west, which are the only developed parcels within a third of a mile in that direction. The subject parcel's having a buildable land area that's deeper and greater in size than those on Glen Court and its location to the west of Glen Court make it fairly and reasonably comparable to those larger parcels as well. Due to the recent adoption of the GFA limitation, there are no prior applications for GFA relief in the surrounding neighborhood, but using old and limited Town records, he found that 3 of the 5 nearest developed parcels to the east(255, 545 and 795 Glen Court),which have no variance history and no recent building permit history for living space renovations, are characterized by older homes having minimal GFA's below what would be permitted by their buildable land areas. Using more recent building permit records, however, he also determined that the other two closest developed parcels to the east are characterized by a renovated home with 3,985 sf GFA (645 Glen Court) and a reconstructed home with 3,520 sf GFA (445 Glen Court). And of the two dwellings to the west, both of which appear to have been constructed in 2001,the one immediately adjacent to the applicant(8869 Oregon Road)has 4,716 sf GFA; and the one located two parcels to the west(8871 Oregon Road)has 3,263 sf GFA. Therefore,when considering the 4 most recently constructed or renovated soundfront homes within 650 feet of the applicant's parcel in both directions, two have GFA greater than the proposed, and together the four have an average GFA of 3,871 sf,also more than the proposed. And with a buildable land area unconstrained by a bluff, the contiguous parcel to the south (705 Birch Lane) allows for 4,830 sf GFA. In relation to potential impacts of the GFA relief on nearby properties, the finished first floor elevation is designed to be ADA-complaint to accommodate the applicant's physical disability, thus creating a finished grade consistent with the adjacent properties to the east; and the dwelling has been architecturally designed and sited to minimize its visibility from the ends of Glen Court and Birch Lane. Additionally, the adjacent homes to the west and south are both positioned at higher elevations and would thus look downward toward the proposed dwelling. It is also critical to consider that the combined 3,147 sf of in-fact 1st and 2nd floor area is compliant with the property's maximum allowable GFA of 3,148 sf, as the "excess GFA" is created solely by the 548 sf first floor living area having a 22-foot ceiling height,which by code is counted twice by the GFA calculation because the ceiling height exceeds 15 feet. As the structure's 25-foot height is compliant with the code's maximum height and sky plane restrictions,however,no one looking at the house from a surrounding property or roadway would be aware of, or being adversely impacted by,the"excess" 7 feet of interior ceiling height. Given these considerations and conditions,neither the granting of the requested GFA relief pursuant to §280- 207(A)(1)nor the granting of the setback relief requested for the dwelling from the front lot line pursuant to §280-124(B)and swimming pool from the top of bluff pursuant to §280-116(A)(1)will cause an undesirable change to the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. Ro ert E. Herrmann Sworn to before me this 10' day of December, 2024 c, 4�� Notary blic KIM H. STEPH702,2]0,__2! Notary Public-State of N No.01 ST501593 Qualified in Suffolk C ZS Page 2 My Commission Expires Augus 2. The benefit sought by the applicant is the construction of an ADA-compliant dwelling with a modern architectural style capable of satisfying specific functional, aesthetic and health-related needs, with an accessory swimming pool in the rear yard: In order to maximize the use of the property, the applicant was planning ahead as long as 26 years ago when he merged the former 5,000 sf area of Glen Court with the subject parcel, which increased the lot's landward depth from the bluff and its buildable land area, thus enabling the site to be developed with a bluff setback-compliant dwelling and a swimming pool within the 20-percent lot coverage limitation(15.6%). Nevertheless, the presence of the bluff still reduces both the lot depth of the buildable area and the area of buildable land, together creating a difficulty for all proposed construction to comply both with the minimum required bluff and front yard setbacks and the maximum allowable GFA, which is derived not from the total lot area of 25,308 sf but from the buildable land area of 18,383 sf. Specifically, though the majority of the dwelling meets the 40-foot front yard setback, the need for the attached garage entrance to face the roadway and associated driveway to the east unavoidably requires the attached garage to extend farther south than the rest of the house and partially within the required front yard setback. And while the dwelling meets the 100-ft bluff setback,a rear yard pool must be located within the bluff setback, and as there is practicable or code-compliant alternative location for the pool on any other side of the dwelling. With respect to the GFA relief, not only did the purchase of the property and its subsequent merger with the end of Glen Court occur decades prior to the Town's adoption of a GFA limitation,the design of the dwelling had commenced prior to adoption of the new code and thus had to be evaluated and modified as needed. As a result, the dwelling complies with the newly defined maximum height and sky plane limitations, and as noted above,the combined 3,147 sf of the in-fact 1 st and 2nd floors meets the property's maximum allowable GFA of 3,148 sf based on its 18,383 sf buildable land area. However, an "excess" GFA of 548 sf remains due to the 22-foot—rather than 15-foot—ceiling height above the first floor living area,as the code requires that open air space to be counted in the GFA calculation as if it were a second floor. The applicant considered the alternative of lowering the ceiling height to avoid the variance, going so far as paying the architect to redesign the house accordingly. However, it was for many reasons determined with respect to the overall design scheme that the double-height ceiling is not only integral to the home's modern design and geometric aesthetic, but invaluable to its potential function, use and enjoyment by the applicant. As explained by the architect, reducing the ceiling height to 15 feet disrupts the cohesive visual flow of the interior and diminishes the open air quality that is a hallmark of the design. The additional 7 feet of ceiling height provides an essential visual connection to the second-floor circulation areas, which enhances the overall living experience by creating a sense of openness and continuity, and creates a seamless connection to the proposed rooftop deck and its expansive views of Long Island Sound. As the applicant's physical disability will largely limit his own living experience to the first floor, this open space continuum provides him with the ability to enjoy the associated vistas that would be disrupted or eliminated by a physical second floor. The additional height would also maximize natural light penetration, which is considered critical to the applicant's health. Holistic doctors who have helped the applicant's long-term recovery from a catastrophic bert E. Herrmann Sworn to before me this 10' day of December, 2024 otary ublic KIM H. STEPHENS Notary Public-State of New York No.01 ST5015931 Page 3 Qualified in Suffolk Count My Commission Expires August 02,20 aS accident suggest that increased exposure to natural sunlight supports overall wellbeing and can help mitigate specific medical concerns. Therefore, the applicant has concluded that the only means by which to achieve the benefits provided by the home's architectural design is to seek the relief necessary to maintain the greater ceiling height over the 548 sf portion of the first floor. 3. The requested 18% bluff setback relief for the proposed swimming pool is not mathematically substantial, and the proposed 82-foot bluff setback is not substantial in fact relative to the locations of the two nearest swimming pools on the adjacent property to the west and 4 parcels to the east,both constructed pursuant to bluff setback relief and located roughly as close or closer to the top of bluff. The requested 37.5% front yard setback relief for the proposed dwelling is mathematically substantial but not substantial in fact when considering 3 other soundfront dwellings along Glen Court were newly constructed with the same 25-foot distance from, or closer to, the front lot line pursuant to front yard setback relief, as detailed above in item 1. The 17%relief requested for the proposed 3,695 GFA is not mathematically substantial and not substantial in fact when considering 1) the 4,716 sf GFA of the existing dwelling on the adjacent home to the west (8869 Oregon Road); 2)the adjacent home to the south (705 Birch Lane) contains 2,850 sf GFA that could be increased to 4,830 sf based on its buildable land area; 3) the dwelling located 6 parcels to the east(645 Glen Court)contains 3,985 sf GFA; and 4)the most recently constructed dwelling on Glen Court, located 4 parcels to the east(445 Glen Court), which was built pursuant to other variance relief in 2015 (Case 6865), contains 3,520 sf GFA, only 175 sf less than the applicant's proposed GFA on a parcel with almost 8,000 fewer square feet of buildable land area than the applicant's. Again, due to the recentness of the code restriction, there are no prior applications for GFA relief in the surrounding neighborhood, but as an additional means of evaluating substantiality, the applicant's request may be compared with two GFA variances granted to waterfront properties having buildable land areas similarly constrained by bluffs and/or the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area, including one granting 46% relief for 966 sf excess GFA at 1200 Leeton Drive, Southold (Case 7809, October 2023), and one granting 34% relief for 720 sf excess GFA at 2440 Village Lane,Oient(Case 7918,July 2024),both notably more than the 17%relief requested by the applicant for 548 sf excess GFA. 4. The siting and sizing of the proposed construction and associated mitigation measures are designed to minimize and mitigate any potential environmental impacts of the site development and ensure there are no adverse effects on the physical or environmental conditions of the subject property or surrounding properties and neighborhood, as summarized below. a. The proposed dwelling will be well protected from potential flood and erosion damage, as it is located at a high elevation outside all designated flood zones; well landward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area; and a code-compliant distance of 100 feet from the top of bluff, which is presently well vegetated and stabilized at its toe by a bulkhead. Robert E. Herrmann Sworn to before me this 10' day of December, 2024 �t - — Notary Public =Public- TEPHENS Page 4 tate of New York 5015931uffolk Countyres August 02,20 b. The swimming pool, which is designed minimally as a 10' x 25', 250 sf"plunge pool," is located as close to the house as possible in a conforming rear yard and would be equipped with a saltwater filtration system to avoid use of chemicals associated with a traditional, high-chlorination treatment system. c. The dwelling will be equipped with a low-nitrogen, I/A sanitary system located more than 140 feet from the bluff and more than 250 feet from the surface waters of Long Island Sound. Unlike conventional systems that are not designed or equipped to treat nutrients such as nitrogen, I/A systems are designed to significantly reduce nitrogen loading into the groundwater and ultimately surface waters. d. A 25-foot wide vegetated non-turf buffer is proposed to be established adjacent to the top of bluff in place of existing mowed lawn area,which will reduce existing lawn area; increase setbacks between maintained lawn and the naturally vegetated shoreline ecosystem; and serve as a sink and filter for stormwater runoff and potential contaminants contained therein, thus providing both water quality protection and erosion control benefits. e. To further minimize potential impacts from stormwater runoff, a proposed stormwater drainage system is designed to capture and recharge roof and surface runoff from the proposed dwelling,pool and patio. f. A temporary project limiting fence will be installed to contain site disturbance and potential surface runoff during construction. 5. As described in detail in item 2, the applicant has thoroughly explored design alternatives to avoid the need for relief, including that required from the GFA limitation adopted long after the applicant's purchase of the property. Although the Board may find that the difficulty is at least partially self-created,Chapter 62,Article 16, Section 267-b(3)(b)of the Consolidated Laws of New York sets forth that a self-created difficulty "shall not necessarily preclude the granting of an area variance." Ro ert E. Herrmann Sworn to before me this 10' day of December, 2024 otary Public KIM H. STEPHENS Notary Public-State of New York No.01 ST5015931 Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission Expires August 02,20-,,-2S Page 5 Zoning Board of Appeals APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: The Joseph Charles Casarona Trust SCTM No. 1000-83-1-36.1 1. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed:N/A II.New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: 60' x 62.3' (irregular, 2,231 sf) Dimensions of new second floor: 60' x 43' (irregular, 916 SO Dimensions of floor above second level: N/A Height(from existing natural grade): 25' (max) Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height(above ground)measured from natural existing grade to first floor: No basement proposed III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: N/A Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage,sky plane(From Surveyor,Design Professional): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: N/A Proposed increase of building coverage: 2,870 sf Square footage of your lot: 25,293 sf total: 18,382 sf buildable land Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area(lot coverage) 15.6% Gross Floor Area(GFA)of single family dwelling including the attached garage and/or habitable detached accessory structure: (Please refer to Chapter 280, Section 280-207 of the Town Code): 3,695 sf For Residential lots, is project within the allowable Sky Plane?(Please refer to Chapter 280, Section 280-208 of the Town Code): Yes V. Purpose of New Construction: To construct an ADA-compliant dwelling with a modern architectural style capable of satisfying specific functional, aesthetic and health-related needs, with an accessory swimming pool in the rear yard. VI.Please describe the land contours(flat,slope %,heavily wooded,marsh area,etc.)on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): Describe on separate page if needed: The presence of the steeply sloped bluff on the property reduces both the lot depth of the buildable area and the area of buildable land, together creating a difficulty for all proposed construction to comply both with the maximum allowable GFA and minimum required bluff and front yard setbacks. Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction,and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. Revised 6/2023 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises currently listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes X No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? X No Yes,please explain on separate sheet. C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? Yes 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? Yes 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? Yes 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the BOARD OF TRUSTEES for its determination of jurisdiction? No Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Board of Trustees: Town Wetlands Permit application to be filed upon receipt of ZBA determination. If issued,please attach copies of your permit listing conditions of approval with a copy of the approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? No E. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? No If any of the aforementioned items exist on your property,please show them on a site plan. F. Are there any construction projects currently in process on your property? NO If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe scope of work: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If none exist,please apply to the Building Department to obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. N/A H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? Yes If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey and identify the Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-83-1-26 (under single and separate title) I. Please list present use or operations conducted at your property, and/or the proposed use Vacant-residential to be improved with single-family dweling and swimming pool. J. (examples:existing single family,proposed:same with garage,pool or other) c:� 4q��_ December 10, 2024 Aut oriz ignature Date Robert E.Herrmann Coastal Management Specialist KIM H. STEPHENS Notary Public-State of New York No.01 ST5015931 Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission Expires August 02,20>�� L AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit,site plan approval,use variance,area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: The Joseph Charles Casarona Trust 2. Address of Applicant: Charles Casarona, Trustee, PO Box 1149, Cutchogue, NY 11935 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant):same 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Description of Proposed Project:See attached project description. 6. Location of Property: (Road and Tax map Number) 1000-83-1-36.1 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? {X} Yes { } No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? {X} Yes { } No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s)of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office(765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 1000-95-1-10; MS Garvey Thompson Trust, 350 Beal Street, Apt. 2323, Hingham, MA 02043 2 1000-95-1-11.4; North Fork Haven LLC, 25 Spruce Drive, Roslyn, NY 11576 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the bac this page if there are additional property owners) 12 10 / 2024 Signature of Applicant Robert E. Herrmann Date Coastal Management Specialist Note: 1.The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3.Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. r THE JOSEPH CHARLES CASARONA TRUST 55 GLEN COURT CUTCHOGUE,NY SCTM#1000-83-1-36.1 Construct a 1 & 2-story single-family dwelling and attached garage with 3,695 sf GFA where a maximum of 3,148 sf is allowed, and a 25-foot front yard setback where a minimum of 40 feet is required; construct a 10' x 25' accessory swimming pool with an 82-ft setback where 100 feet is required; construct a 1,523 sf grade-level masonry patio; install I/A OWTS sanitary system and stormwater drainage system; and permanently establish a 25-foot vegetated non-turf buffer in place of existing lawn adjacent to top of bluff, all as depicted on the site plan prepared by JM2 Architecture, last dated November 19, 2024. f f 61 Z20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 -Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Casarona Trust Residence Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 55 Glen Court,Cutchogue, SCTM#1000-83-1-36.1; located on west end of Glen Court, +/-42'west of Birch Lane (map provided). Brief Description of Proposed Action: Construct a 1 &2-story single-family dwelling and attached garage with 3,695 sf GFA where a maximum of 3,148 sf is allowed, and a 25-foot front yard setback where a minimum of 40 feet is required; construct a 10'x 25'accessory swimming pool with an 82-ft setback where 100 feet is required;construct a 1,523 sf grade-level masonry patio; install I/A OWTS sanitary system and stormwater drainage system; and permanently establish a 25-foot vegetated non-turf buffer in place of existing lawn adjacent to top of bluff, all as depicted on the site plan prepared by JM2 Architecture, last dated November 19,2024. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 347-888-7844 The Joseph Charles Casarona Trust E-Mail: jasarona@mac.com Address: c/o Joseph C.Casarona, Trustee, PO Box 1149 City/PO: State: Zip Code: Cutchogue �NY 11935 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 25,293 sf b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 15,824 sf c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 25,293 sf 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑ Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑ Commercial N'Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture VAquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑ Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes, identify: 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO j YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: V 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: V 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional R( Wetland ❑Urban 9 Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO ❑YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO❑YES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: . 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE 11�54anaqement MATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE E. Herrmann December 10, 2024 Applicant/sponsor na Specialist, En-Consultants Date: Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail, identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 37 33 39 51T�C ACC�55 VIA SUG 1�CT f'KOf'�t?TY) Duck Pond Pt U 1V D G �.Oto'1'P O ey LP T J 1 ° s ao e9 ti �a I 5uffdk C=4 Hagstrom Map 25 �T.Y• V' 0 P� I 1 as p i o f 9 J o P OREGON < 0. P 6 V 9y, G o N s m m ` t�SEUPTAE EGOS °�O .pO I �jrl c gq yy ° \ to N J Mu. D EA T TTITUCK a � u cP� i d NODD CUTCNOGUE TE . \ P APIE AV o > y d f 1 BD Y I {p�„ U, C i-I Q V,Uy E p y DY�4�Dcl s „ .r• v O � m o° % v C M 1 d °c, � °st P z' n +r Y<� d"�'DARS ✓n en PIPE y m kDOka a c G ¢ CEDARS RD z Ol i cy L 1-'• ra Ol ° t.� f --- _ —C) �L�•' TITUCkn m � i ip9�..f 3u C LU c;rce; .; o We� 0�\ J� NEW . n � � Ck a ° ° :r'��rx ty t CY •- �AY z �n aF y .'tarj�F(M p E *• `�5�+^a�!j•,�Q`� �+�y�Wr' � p E.L FGI wl d,° � o o ¢, h n�.�C.0 U<lJt7r*Yx a:•r' s AV°N °LDP I W q �• �f;`' � ��..: I O T .� - g n ` Ct• � )CES 0 Y `P«er o w° MATTITUCK --..AY_....... ..... ..Q . ...Z... ...—.—�/ FgQJ v rQ��uLe a AIRPORT upG4<oh °° Pc`rP° o w1n u Q ,� p�� a nP aw ° d 9L• WJ' � // CENTER ST I C� O •�'7�' O � � 3 90 1 R'(LE CM MINEOLA PARX IAV R ! �(I}}I nn1I A Old Cove .E%1'. Spy As °HCy"qos a 11I a Nlarra�ooka P� ���" T Y.C. i °lTR A K AV i A Lr�y RING QI�r Krmfzi en r `'4ck v J Q O 0 26 1 PARK PC.; SON �/�Q D sr /MnNr? i 4 I d NEW SUFFOLK I [j('�� /�9 ///��� f}��, (,���,} /7��/]' /7J[' {may i q G R Jl.d A i P Jie V ® 6 y 8 V/ 1 1 NORTH RACE a Board'of Zoning Appeals ADDUCatt®n AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) Joseph Charles Casarona, Trustee I, The Joseph Charles Casarona Trust residing at 55 Glen Ct., PO Box 1149 (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) Cutchogue, IVY 11935 do hereby authorize (Agent) En-Consultants to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. 765 Owls ignature) (P ' t Owner's Name) APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : Joseph Casarona,Trustee,The Joseph Charles Casarona Trust (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X, Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered"SIZES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the app➢icant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through ID)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater that 50/o of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or 1D)the actual applicant (DESCRIPTION OF REI,ATIONSIHP Submitted t da 2 5 Signature i � ��✓ �� Print Name Joseph Charles Casarona Trustee The Joseph Charles Casarona Trust AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics Prohibits conflicts of interest on the cart of town officers and employees The Purpose of this form is to Provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : Herrrmann, Robert E. (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance XX Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO XX If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 110th f December,20 24 Signature Print Name Robert E. Herrmann Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1, All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 83 - 1 - 36.1 PROJECT NAME The Joseph Charles Casarona Trust The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ® Board of Trustees ❑ Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital ❑ construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) ❑ (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Construct a 1 &2-story single-family dwelling and attached garage with 3,695 sf GFA where a maximum of 3,148 sf is allowed,and a 25-foot front yard setback where a minimum of 40 feet is required;construct a 10'x 25'accessory swimming pool with an 82-ft setback where 100 feet is required; construct a 1,523 sf grade-level masonry patio; install I/A OWTS sanitary system and stormwater drainage system;and permanently establish a 25-foot vegetated non-turf buffer in place of existing lawn adjacent to top of bluff,all as depicted on the site plan prepared by JM2 Architecture, last dated November 19,2024. Location of action: 55 Glen Court,Cutchogue Site acreage: 0.581 Present land use: vacant-Residential Present zoning classification: R-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: The Joseph Charles Casarona Trust (b) Mailing address: Joesph Casarona,Trustee PO Box 1149, Cutchogue,NY 11935 (c) Telephone number: Area Code (347) 888-7844 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No ® If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ®Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable The proposed dwelling will be well protected from potential flood and erosion damage,as it is located at a high elevation outside all designated flood zones;well landward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area; and a code-compliant distance of 100 feet from the top of bluff,which is presently well vegetated and stabilized at its toe by a bulkhead. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable -SEE ATTACHED ADDENDUM- Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ®Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable -SEE ATTACHED ADDENDUM- Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes [—] No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES ° Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable PREPARED BY TITLECoastal Management Specialist DATE December 10,2024 Robert E. He ann Amended on 811105 THE JOSEPH CHARLES CASARONA TRUST,55 GLEN COURT,CUTCHOGUE Figure]. Looking north toward Long Island Sound over vacant parcel to be improved with single-family dwelling and accessory swimming pool. L. S. .a .c►:; i� �. s Figure 2. Looking south from top of bluff over vacant parcel to be improved with single-family dwelling and accessory swimming pool,and at adjacent dwellings to south and west, f ' _ , :L TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PR TY RECORD CARD _ OWNER - STREET .�--Y VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT -FORMER OvyNER,. N E ACR. 1 r`ZC1 l •C. .C.Pry' . --` " v/GI I��0 }— �, u N 1,J- ,� �. -; S W TYPE OF BUILD G RES. � SEA . VL. FARM COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS /J.� -" .� t,.✓ !�ls.: ter_) /• I«.m^'.+' ..._i „ram n e'.zf '�'� �, ,�J.,. /�sJ ✓ �'!--C r,{ f! ��/ �r .rt::J �' C.J',.G..-�! .+ .1706 %,... mil J-) J C,%:...s� ! w^'�-�t1 7�"'F�� I �F�i f•._7 � ��t { !1GI •_`:.:..J �_lJ ' r AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FARM Acre Value Per Value Acre i Tillable 1 Tillable 2 Tillable 3 i Woodland Swampland FRONTAGE ON WATER j Brushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD f 4 House Plot DEPTH F BULKHEAD i DOCK Total 1 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT ACR. REMARKS TYPE OF BLD- ) PROP. CLASS i4t i"ks � c(j �,N, 5 30 LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE FRONTAGE ON WATER TILLABLE FRONTAGE ON ROAD WOODLAND DEPTH MEADOWLAND BULKHEAD HOUSE/LOT TOTAL Revisionsr^ _ 08-22-98 � �J 01-20-98 04-23-98 99- -9 11-2323-98 o'c"( /f1 e tl lVW Ws ���-Y•✓' cd 1 06-22-99 N321882W 08-23-99 V y 07 i ' 10-O5-99 os-az-ooC SOUND - 09-28-04 01-31-05 ; 07-29-O5 �• �( r I A -,�q.> 1m - 10-31-OS ' 04-2e-06 J@Al�§� 134 SCH.D.9 F.D• 11-17-06 ' Q�r O I I /. `Q slpa,E �',�p„ri/' _ 2.2A(c) A; I 05 115 06-04-07 - ��j F:/ 4 09-24-08 lJ✓''1 r-� ,_ (S""-' �xs ?BH7c� - „e 16tA c 7.2 :I 2.SA(c) e 07-11-16 I 7.5 ^I 12-02-15 ?7,1 - 01-16-19 VVV 1 7• 7% 2.3A(c) 09-24-193 r, . -� /rN 01-23 :n� -24 .....J/.. G �q 17.3 17.4A(c) 1�•s'/`lll5 IC .f II A 1 •D ,fi 6j\<L n , h 3 PARK a�P r P �2i fir,�...` � G1i ryo o .p� `°i^.O�• - Jjty tE�y '� i tip C, a '1. •, p�zp�� lTOWI DEVELI 'X h e%Qc ��`v ry. y. ry' �,' 'b`. AA- J w P- by ry9. ,'2» •` Q •' „� ��. a%`F..y ;ir.- •1'Q, (TOWNOF SOU - •'.'u ,,p"„'T �_ ` DEVELOPMENT RIC NA Alh m i ^P ``, Cim 32.3 vs 29.7A(c) FOR PCL.NO. FOR PCL.NO. FOR PCL.NO. FOR PCL.NO. ` SEE SEC.NO. SEE SEC,NO. SEE SEC.NO. SEE SEC.NO. V 095-01-008.3 095-01-009 095-07-010 095-01-011.4 N 318082Aa � / MATCH z .... .. - ^� LINE SEE,SEC.NO.095 L M-U tIYlYN OTW—E.AUPPDPERTES —E0 ARF4 6 OU W TNIS S T- 23 M1Y,P ImIc.I iE'.NRRIN RE FOLLOIYNS DISTKTS: +,vTen.w r+u l,m Prvwl ve E S 00L a _ _— _ _ All—lE IAAATI O ¢..Lm,.n P.,n —�— O».eni»n 121 A1C)or 121A G FIRE )9 ——> — XYORAM Iaxlw men WLo.Llro ------- C.Y�utlkONw 121 A(C) y E W.T n mRR an N p SEVER _ _ rvnSTEWATER_ __wv_ °°^L^arc ��— v:^ra,yua:3W W (21) ARC JM2 ITECTUREPc m+2 AKp,IrCPJFf,n; 2410 NOK'i',MAN AV'ZMA gar.3v t I esl I33C5 7I;31.M.3307 'rlb'ATOP,:v'W Applicant: Arch,tect of Record: iM, ;rrc.fr. 10pkr, r-;.,c 5",3c0 a:3,-_3305 Structural Engmcer: MEP Engmccv: _.� Surveyor: Pyramid Perspective 7 -I 0 I �•�I<u w,K Ca5arona Residence, Cutchogue ,fiDo! - - - - 55 G NY 11935 I hogue r r III I r Roof ... .... .....T 5rl a �. TI ` — — I I i 1 1 i le-family 5in Pro 0sed p 9 Y I a � 11 Ij P jI I ��•��ii l 11�1 I;I{[ I'it i .�:: fI�_,=f I 4r. f� it �I t''�� ,:.�I :\p II. I -j,,,l_._ J_Ithl.i r ti;TT I��I �I � I J �{I , 1 _ _.l{ � :�;�:,.:La!tl!1 Re5 fdence --_ .._......_-_... --...........................,_..- :n I:4 i {. . !II .I : I t.�l Ii III Lf !:ttl.: I I !:-„ r Il_ d. I'tt _ f L,. d'�I .� j_. 111�11 IL �I-' - r a�-- —r::• - a ,r+k�t.�r �o?:�..,3ar-d _r-¢sa>, . .__ . . ..._. .--......................._ - �.�: - _.. Pill.�I L) __ ._. i �� , .: � ... I.:I !I. 1 .� L � : :-' �1 ::. tl•*-� --� I I -'I I-- - i .L..1.1.1- I li I fl { lil .T__ I5 ma= . I:-;; I.0 I:rl I�I , A c.a Flew c _ 11 :4 F` - _._ t - --q_ - ..- - ••. .::,,t.slllll It. 6f Iiru.I't11 4� :fI:I, :I i:I" ? I. -- I� t .R -.. { ._ _. �f I_ 1I Iwl. i I II lu II;1 I�:�{ {:.I. - — Aqua_Elzvauon ._._III-- L_..I! =1 I I__I L_I rI 4 -39'-G38ai ..,I,,.;,_ .IL l I11'Ia I _ - - u I _. .__... h.:.. I�. ..._ --- .� - ....._____.._-- - .� I I.--I I I---.l I ._I 11.-1 .-I -= -_ -_ -:: Sa-a - s7 —1._, _.._ _ ._ ,.... r .. I L-_. .....y -1. .�_.- _..t I�. -I I -_ .....I —f l o� '.-_ = I --- - ._ .. ....... ...... ....... ._ ._.._.. ......... __._ I . .�. :..--- L__.I ..III......._III.___III._.__III..-..._III..—III-..__ .._.._I -... ....__ ___ I__:::' ;::::::: — .._..._ ..._. ___. ....._.. .._.:.. __..... _...__ III ...1II._......11 I..-......III.....__II I- , L.._,I,._,I,_.I:..__."' II III. L,,,._�::,11.,I III 111-111;T. Il_;III.;'.:III,;;II,;.;IIL . - South Elev. 6 East Elev. 1 ,102110, Kopf L.._....... _. r�'f i•r,�tTi l l l r a ITT i i'I't l „I -,; clt nrce sfla'1� I r. .T.Lj�? _. I— — ,R,op• t e-vA-oz'+I,,6T_ AJI AC me`EOPr.Cm�c N2 Ae I b 1M,F.c Mf _ UNWTH PVT UtiE Of ThF5'OMIMcr,_b IN A {�— — 1 — a �.. j rl '}I III 'G' wc.,,lcno"ecrCMr ?.09%iWAV cuzormrar. i r 11J I �I r If srarenlicanoNw I�: [}�I tlri _- 1 - �h: 5kY Y Plane Anal 515 to + I •�II. ,� { I � l,I I ! ;. �. �� .I .[.1 I� I f,{ I r: �,)It. I [I�I,..�, I �LI,I..II I!{IiIl l.i�I I�,L Jf�.t�I,-t.I.1r...1I>Ll.It.:.; I.t'�1 ,1I.{_.11:...�-I�+I,LI iI_'t_..t..I_iI,�._l:.,_�4�.��.1_::::.II I_--. ..1..-I-I n__.�_=I"II1...T.:_-I.1I._II_I.I_-III.._I..-___II I ::: ��,,�.�,,.�,�. ,_ ------ �;. scanslaoca:wal.c0o3.wI1= 1= auarrcv.�: T� I L..__I I. I I L...I I L_I I L - [_. _-:1.= .1� �n5t.<,.. ut,w: .oz.Cse Aver,q„Elevacot .... -.... � - I--- I- - - - Avzrage Eltvat n_ I - Sic-d 14N° ' ' r-... •.--- = i - -- --.. ._ Il i- -17 -- - I -..._ --..._ I _.��.L..-� ..... _ -59 G 318„_.,.._�--. .._Levc(14 L. ..: d..l i I.......;I, l I( .....�-...;f... ii ......,L_.._ . _, --- -- fi—T.._... --- .Iu,N.u�r.o: DAM g14Q024 _.._ .._ _ -. - - - Sg.o_ .._ - — - - _- — ` --1-1- I- - �TII I11 I I I (' I___i Tl___ I I I.f f` -111= T�f ;fI -1 _ -m s'_r -- - - - -- -- - -- -- -- - -- „_.., „ -.-Trl ..._I i__77 _. I I --- -'-`II - - - - - -- - - --III sE,ur5,NAn:K:: n_-rcxeor,r: a:>Y 1—r II--'II, -- -- I 11Thr .��il I :::.11 ._-1 I I'..._.1 . I I_-.-1 11..-:.:1 11. f:..=_I 11.-..IIII_-1 I I=..1 .I I .-1 I I:.-:.... I .-.-.I . !.-::.1 West Elev. Ep North Elev. eR o o.rcrfn5:y� SCn;E. U a Nr 9' Ptr 3g A-101 T,qr o 65 y�Q'F JM2 "-G• 4112 RC ITECTUREPc n12 Aem;rcrou.Pc 24 0 NOeM CCfAN AYeIUc 5Unt 3W FAR�IINGV L f,rN.1 173E I I e31 320.3305 PI ail 320.3307 Applicant: Architect of Record: 1M2 AmJn:rctWC.PC F3rmnjntle,NY I i 73b viI 32G3305 XL - Structural Engmcer: I z <1o.C• I I -ao1 ac, I I MEP Enq neer': e I _ I _ - .. :.,.. ...:. 1 5ur cyor: . -. PEAR PFTIC }y O m I _22 01.'1. .. Y 4 ':oleo V. g Casarona Residence, E U Cutchogue I _ I 55 G g � Glen Ct Cutcho ue, rRev'. 10_ G,"h I 'i raCRSAN i_ 7-0., 00UPLn.IGnT cc i Proposed 51nje-Family N u;l T--�x Lp• El 1 I ..._ Residence -IA fn dwran t.Zc j5-dP:r.: 1-31024 DDm �I o pI - •� _. . .. .. I ... .. ... _ t --.---- I a I M a t �I I I _ ro r0 Ir , _ - - L © .�. . '. .. - O FIT RCNi'tN'IY4r:LF ` TM5t MA.1YG5 ARE AN I4',TRUAtENr OP S.CVICL.AND AI RICH M THE C. n — — a rr UTf 12 { b I ror semA• e o rA EI UCAWN IA L 09 L3GIb_A I 0 N[N.Y. LNUMNIZE'OEP@Th5[+CC(:LIMZP175TURN.A.c VIOL,ICe o-e`.COC9 N .. f .. — CS .., IS' { flbt.l.LII:11 - � I LII: III11,11 I1 I:II I I First Floor Plan I rix2Cer I I L'. IIG I ',rMa 0001083.00-01.00036.001 WIDIItG No: _.PAV'C,Z Krtti Ho.: .IM2 Nc: 2022Ctl?G PLANNING lk: OATI:: II620D1 YX51 FLCOK PRLA:2.2 1 b 5r 5[AL a 51'AMQ. Ot,%Nt0 fir: A'J'^-T I r1 UMP Or: Oeia 6 `ytE Cyr 5 nIF: un•,r o G'-3' CJ 5'-10 1,2£ 81 ---- 6':Il ur.. .,. 2-0. 1°'•2' o,Zd CF9�C.a Lnra k: f FIRST FLOOR I F39-6 N-6v+�oet 1/4"= 11-011 20 A-200 1 'rrl.:ix'c.ticsd: JM2 A_i01 .�C I RC I T E C T U R E P A42 AKaIErtCNRE,fa 2410 NORM CCEAN AYtNUE SUIT'300 fAw.I?:cv,tU.'P. r '3,320.33C5 rl 931 37.0.3307 w.a. ..........'_'_.'_ ,. Applicant: Architect of fZecord: me Ic fkn,0:-s+A,,5u 3C0 _ y oat i2Gg30S Structural Engmcer: # \/ MEP Engmcer: It 5ur cyor: Oe�h TO MOW - f CaSarona Residence, Cutchogu CLU 1 DN 25 e 1 evr c ® . 24 K0.,r AREA / 55 Glen Ct, Cutchogue, - 1 � „ pN .. -.a ... NY 11935 rM P ropo5ed Single-Family - esidence 22 _ ,.. .Z1 K B 5 v cit O 23 uckl _. AO I_ q - F SECOND R.00K AWN:9305P •NCLUDING OECC. 400`D[cv. ineSE CILHY45rRE AN iN5T2i l'MENr 0.`StRVIC:.AlID A`i rO5 wan AKt RE rKOMT'r Cf AQ ARI'm:I.IUKf.°c.mrf VK:ARnCfi.::�USE OF MESt CCQn.Rr:rS C IN A VICtATICII OF:trinct1'209 SUyriryl^DN 2.Of ME N.Y. STATE 5PUMCr:bRP. Second floor Plan 5rnxslxoa,3.cca1.wo3s;.wl eunolNcu,. ccon5oo.: unz:ro: zaz2cn5G SECOND FLOOR MAN t51no: nAe: uzAl, 5E•4151GW1TURt: Ot;•'0Nt0 nT: Anus 1/411= 1'-0" 20 rrtafnb:. 0,- MIG SD A-201 3965�pQ. F N� ARC JM2 ITECTUREPc IM2 ARCltl fi6P3RE•PC 2 I 2410 NORTH F.AN AVENUE ..YO I 5U1i:3••U Y i01 FAr,'bIR1C-lNlit.Src,!I:36 T I G31.320.33C5 Pi S3:32.0.330i Applicant: ............. .............._._._._...._. ........._.....__....._......................__. 1M2 ArNi:r_txc.rT. ._........ ._.__.._...__............._._... ..._................. ... "10 r4r;nC IA•,a.5-300 Iry 11735 -- -_- - _-- =_ -_- r -trlE 1 -r: ................................. ............................. ...... .................................. ......__...__..._....._...._._........._.... ...._......_...................._..._..._...... ..................---._....._...._............... t u�u a ng new i ..-:_ =__ --_ -- -- -- ............_._._.-'----- ............_.._..._............_...--—__ _.._._..........._......__....__....._._......: .._._.._._............_.__..._._...._........ - --- _ --- -- —'--- MEP ff.,, er: I - -- -- --- -- - ---- ri I I surveyor: I i ---..............................._--_----_--c- -- -- _ - ......._____ -__ __ __ _ PrvI^cr Wn� _ _ _ r- - -- -- - - a a ona es de e--- ----- - C s R nc Cutchogue ,' 11 Fr,2cL AAAres. ...........................— --- 55 Glen Ct, Cutchogue, - - - - ............ -._._ NY 11935 _____ _ .._ .......... ..----- _ k z 4 Proposed 51ngle-Family - -_-- - - _- .. ---_ --- esi ence _............................ ........... . R d ............ _ ra..".o _..... _.._._.._.............._.........._......_.—.__.__._.__..._.._.._._.........._........._.___._..._ ._..__.._._.................__._..__..___._.._.._......_._.....................__.__..._._.___.._.._ ._........__....____....._.___._._................................._..__._—.......__._.._......--..................... I h'MSE oWdroiXO'FPS N!N5MMV0 D.`5MIIC,A.'IC A5 5uQl ARt ME rRG!'eRtt OF A.12 AK !-,ECTURE•.'.C.AAf uNAITrl1.nPWT.P tIE 0f TNE5E ED000M V:T5 L:IN A 41C"_ATICN 0F,3tC➢CN'2095U>DhE+:ON 2 OF iM[N.Y S rAIE EOuCArICN LAW. Roof Plan 51,-(hIp'UC9L(+9.CC-0I.CC�Oit;.iAl d011011:C K;- 5MI511n: JM2 W; 202�Ce5G 1'XINiNG No: DATE: I"IM2d SEAL c 51GWiTURt: 0 51GN't0 5Y: mrA' ROOF PLAN ales fnuN: ova.- un=I'u I/4"_ 1 i-0° 20 ��5 eu gyh�r� MIG Q� fTsu Nc: !NTgr 0 394 5 FN OQr A-202 E`tt ELEVATION NOTES Z JM2 -4U1 I v+0! RC ITECTUREPc J112 ARCHIP:CDABC,PC 17 — — — — — — — — — — — I. —. — — 241e YOEm MAN 0.YENUC SUIIf i:lJ r.111,N iH.,rr.!I`3d t 551 320.33i:5 FI s f 320a70: I Applicant: 1 S ' Architect.Pte ucrrii3fE Rec o d. ilOn — c&e3W. -320-3305 oECOND F.F_ Structural Engineer: i ---- - r----i MEP Engmee!•: ELEVATION KEY NOTE5 _ _ I I I _. .J .. ... .. , 5urveyor: 1 I I I -I ! I i i FIPSiF.F . .:::.. :: ---- _ I:._ — ...___._-- - --- 58'_D" i — .... .I, ... Pro ca\a,e Ca5arona Residence, I — - - Gutchogue 55 Glen Ct, Cutchogue, PronoSed South Elevation (� NY 11935 1/4'= 1'-0" Proposed 5gle-Family Residence t•.. 1Ii.g:;r,:iKa to Z-15-11-- I3.202; If - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -F 1 L. I I I , I' SECOND F.F. _�,. — — — - - - - — — W i — -- — - .5 1 f _ Md;OW:tNGS AC AN N5RWEJT O`51t`1IC:.A1.10 AS L- SLCH AF}Mc`r ItRnC OF J%12 AFC UTRF,P.C.ANf UNAUTHDUMI t:+E Or TI-IM CCLLt.NG 11 IN A '• I I 1 I SfCfICN PJ VKAAiICN Or 77 -UMN1 CN 2 Of ItIF NY S . .. II n7JCUly I LAML� 1 I r 6 , I Avera�a Ele',�atlon I` ' 59' C. FIRST �'—' _ Elevations �L�i—, - — — —— — — — — — —Y 58 F.F. r �1- _ __ 1=— � I—! .�: L•S —_ I_ ._ ._ _.. -_ I'-- �I �-'I -I I.. 1'__ I _ I II I ' -- -- �. �i-=• 5c7fMe Iccoo:.COal.w-0]6.a1 6uaon:G Nn I _- =1 5Colu No.: uz ao: zOzzznc C — — L — ,I _I -_ — _- — — — — — — 'IaJ•rNG I:;. Dare .2•I , i ;. i SEAL+S10WlP,'C: O.S:GNtO BY: ht"' OlfwD BY. Oe:Rcr SEpCD `y �YjT SCAIf: .we Proposed East Elevation 1/4"— 1''O' JO •�TqT a 3965 0 A-300 F FIN ELEVATION NOTES JM2 I RC ITECTUREPc _ 24lTVAORRCV1it 1 t°��iLvfM) A'PfCV UC - — — — — — -- I—fC, — _I — — -- — — — — — Apphcal nSt:i:Fi2p.33G5^ 'S!i70.:i70i I � { Architect of Record: I fr. 11110 r 1_,r_h, co IMMSECOND Structural Engineer: 70_g.— , I ELEVATION KEY NOTES MEP 6Lglneer: Y � , i I Surveyor: 1 �Ave laae Ee'.'arlom 59' FlST -�, -' — - — - - -'- = - LE --- — ----- — — - — Casarona Resldence, _ - - t - - I - Y Cutchogue - - rj - t I --- _ 55 Glen Ct, Cutchogue, Prono5ed North Elevation I NY 1 1 935 1/4"= 1'-0' 30 I mProposed Smgle-Family Resldence Pam,+ ...vi xSncrt uv rozr,.:ry,'.rd Form. d-2024 -i I• + + o SECOND F.P_ _ _ _ _ -r cw:vim effv'.N xunLfNrvgfevCF.x7u UC I A-1 T'I .,. I OF Iu2 ARC I-fCRJV,P.L AW fraIT Kv.,,,rn`m�eaxda;,,r.Iur. - tiitUATICY101' TIcll720)=J1016&0`!'OF1H[N.Y. SrArf FrUCARO`I La',Y. I 1 J 0-1 Too EI tions - _ - - eva .. f ........ _ -- 'It �,.. .._ ,.. .... � Y ;Corsi N.: u'2 No: 202 Cri56 -- - -- �.::...: rj:aiu;rue:.:: Dare: — - -- WR " I ' ism r — - - — �— t I - CMECnf➢5Y: �r — ! I : . �__ - 1 - { 1 �n �. i ' � � SCna: I _ RTu No: Proposed West Elevation I"'�2 ' 1/4"= 1'-0" 301 �T9rFoFNE��oe� A-301