Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-09/13/1984 _b o y Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 �l ( TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI M I N U T E S REGULAR 'ME.ETING 'THURSDAY-,' SE.PTEMBER T3 ; T984 A Regular Meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals was held on Thursday1' 'Sep_tem,ber 'l3 1984. at 7 : 30 o ' clock p .m. at the Southold Town Hall , .Main Road.,- Southold, New York. Present were : Gerard P. Goehri'nger , Chairman; Serge Doyen ; Charles Grigonis ; Joseph H . Sawicki ; _Robert J . Douglass_. Also present .were Victor Lessard,. Building . Department Administrator and approximately 27persons in -the audience at the opening of the meeting . The Chairman opened the meeting at 7 : 30 .p .m. The first hearing on the agenda was for the matter of ;H.ENRY 'P . SMITH ; which was recessed from the. July .'2.6 , 1984 hearing for' additional information . Neither the applicant or his att_orney ,. was present , .and ' the board decided to allow the applicant more time and to reconvene later in the meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No . 3263 : Application of .ROGER .MUNZ , Box 567 , Laurel , NY (by_ Cardinale .and Cardinale , -Esgs . )- _foror a:- * Variance for relief .from' Condition No . 7 of .the,_ May 27 , .1983 deci - sions rendered in Ap-plications -No . ' 3100 and 3101 : Property Location : 13175 Main Road , Matti_tuc_k , 'NY ; County Tax Map ..Parcel No . 1000-14.0-.03-038 (Owners : ' J . and. C. Moisa/Munz ) . The Chairman opened the hearing at 7 : 36 p .m. and read the legal notice_ of this hearing in its entirety and appeal application . MR. CHAIRMAN : We have a copy of a Tax Map indicating this .and surrounding properties in the area , .and I have a copy of the survey Southold Town Board Appeals -2- September 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3264 - ROGER MUNZ, continued : ) MR. CHAIRMAN (continued ) : produced by Paul Canalizo on July 2 , 1983 indicating the size of the property in question and the proximity of the existing building on the property. I .also have a letter from Mr . Munz which 1. received the other night which reads as follows : . . . At this late hour . I reluctantly ask for a postponement of my hearing tomorrow night. During the intervening months since our last meeting in April , the plans and uses of the building I. purchased have changed. The site plan , as approved by the Planning Board is no longer valid thereby negating my purposeful meeting tomorrow. . This only occured to me last evening , and I am sorry about the last minute notice . . . It ' s signed by the applicant . Is there anybody that would like to speak in behalf of this application? I know there are p.eople here . Anybody like to speak against the application? Mr . Cron? JAMES CRON , ESQ. : Chairman , gentlemen . My name is James Cron ,. with law offices with Cron and Cron , Main Road , Cutchogue ; and our office represents Mr . and Mrs . Navas , who are adjoining property owners to th.is proposed retail facility . It is my 'understanding that the transfer of ownership has in fact occurred . Does the board know anything about this? MR. CHAIRMAN : Only a conversation I had with the applicant. He called me at my office today in Hauppauge , and he indicated to me that no transfer has taken place . MR. CRON : Then Mr . Waddington do.e.s not own the property? MR. CHAIRMAN : That ' s what he indicated to me , Mr. .Cron . MR. CRON : Thank you , Sir. At this time I will speak in opposition to the. adjournment, based on the last minute attempt to gain some more time . I think it would be highly inappropriate for this board adjourn it. . I would also take issue with the copy of the letter the board has received which was sent to ,. Iii . believe , Mr. Navas and also on it to Mr. Waddington and to his board . In particular and in the application itself , it mentions that the applicant has been unable to meet Condition No . 7 , .which was imposed by this board and also by the Planning Board because of the intransigeance of Mr. Navas . Gentlemen that ' s quite to the contrary . I had a conversation with Mr. Munz requesting and offering to set up a common easement for the benefit of both properties wherein he became very upset and said he was going to run my client out of business . He has been completely intransigeant. He does not wish to discuss it at all , and at this time , I ' d like to hand up the copy of the letter of October 21st , 1983 , which I sent to his counsel , at that time , Mr. Cardinale , along • Southold Town Board of Appeals -3- September '13 , 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3264 - ROGER MUNZ, continued : ) MR. CRON (continued) : with a copy of the proposed easement , which I will show this board . Apart from that:,, I .. know. the-`:board ' s policy as regards adjournments , and if the adjournment is being contemplated , I would first like a ruling on that before I speak in opposition to this. particular matter . (Mr . Cron submitted two documents for the record : survey of Maurice Hansen at Mattituck and October 21 , 1984 letter from James J . Cron to Philip J . Cardi.nal.e . ) MR. CHAIRMAN : Serge (Member Doyen ) ? MEMBER DOYEN : Yes . MR. CHAIRMAN : I have not discussed the issue here about .th.e recess which is the request of Mr . Munz . If you remember , this was the nature of a use variance and Mr. Munz has indicated that because his site plan is no longer which he considers to be proper he wants to go back and resubmit a site plan to the Planning Board and therefore any action that we might to close this hearing might be the nature of re-entertain.i.ng '.another application before this board , or a new application . So how do you feel about the purpose of a recess? I ' ve indicated to this gentleman , meaning the appli- cant , that I have approximately 44 files in our office ready to be heard for public hearings , and I have indicated to him that we will not entertain his application before either December or January of this coming year . And he indicated to the that he cannot sell boats in .the wintertime , and that ' s fine with him. MEMBER SAWICKI : In other words close it , or recess it? MR. CHAIRMAN : It ' s entirely up to you at this particular point. I ' d hate to close the hearing and then make a decision on something that ' s going to. be re-rendered through the Planning Board and which would require a new application at this particular time . MEMBER SAWICKI : If .we recess it tonight , it ' ll go to December or January , whatever. MR. CHAIRMAN : Right. Do you have any objection to th.at ,. 'Bob? . MEMBER D,OUGLASS : If ,he does this , 'and he make.s a few changes with the Pl anni_ng Board, he ' s. g.oi ng to,_..put i n a whole new, file, _anyway isn.' t he? MR. CHAIRMAN : Well , it depends on how sophisticated the change is . In other words , how _materi.al is -the :.change , ok?. He has told me that what he is entertaining in._ the nature of a conversation and I was extremely busy when I had spoken to him today, 'so therefore I did not spent a lot of .time . It was a matter of..maybe a two-minute conversati on , bu.t that he had intended to take ..down_ less of ,the building r Southold Town Board of Appeals -4- September 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3264 - ROGER MUNZ, continued: ) MR. CHAIRMAN (continued ) : ' than he had originally entertained in taking down . So he doesn ' t know how the. Planning Board feels about that. MEMBER DOUGLASS : Can you recess it , Jerry, :>with the stipulation that if it is irradical , if_. the Planning Board comes through with' a radical change that it has to be.. .-resubmitted rather than-- MR. CHAIRMAN : Oh , there ' s no question about that particular point. All ' we would do is close the hearing and then probably deny the appli - cation pending a new application . I guess we ' ll grant the recess , Mr . Cron . MR . CRON : Can I say something , Mr . Chairman? MR. CHAIRMAN : Sure . MR. CRON : It is my understanding that , as is yours , that he.' s going back in for a new site plan approval . I .assume , Mr . Lessard , that the original building and demolition. permit was based on prior site plan approval . If there ' s going to be a major change , I would . . request at this time that the buildi:ng department review the proposed demolition and new construction in that light , and if the new plan . is going to be submitted, I would ask that at this time , normally that the building and demolition permits be revoked. Thank. you , Mr . Chairman . MR . CHAIRMAN: Is there anybody else that . would like to speak in opposition to this application? Mr . Schaeff? DAVE SCHAEFF: My name is Dave Schaeff from Mattituck . I. live right in the rear of said. property , and in my understanding there ' s going to be a lot of sanding of .fiberglass boats and such ; and lacquer , and I don ' t need that kind of environment; my family do-esn ' t need that. And that' s the only opposition I have on this application , and I ' d like you to .cbhsider that before you do approval .. MR. CHAIRMAN : We certainly will . (Ms . Gerrari , private stenographer for Mr. Cron interrupted for the spelling of Mr.. Schaeff' s name . ) S-C-H-A-F-F. MR. CHAIRMAN : Thank you . Is there anybody else that would like to speak in behalf of the application? Questions from board members? Then I make a motion recessing this hearing with no date . On motion by Mr. Goehringer , seconded by Mr. Douglass , it was f Southold Town Board dr Appeals -5- September is, 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal Noo 3264 s ROGER MUNZ, continued : ) RESOLVED, that the matter of Appeal No . 3264;"ROGER MUNZ,, be and hereby is RECESSED 'WITHOUT DATE as requested. Vote of the Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Doyen , Grigonis , Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of all the members . PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No . 3262 . Application of J . P . HUBERMAN , 2 Linda Lane , Setauket , NY (by. I . Price , Jr. , Esq . ) for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance ; Article III , Section 100-30 (C) . for permission to establish home occupancy , to wit: physician office , within a one-family residential building exceeding 30% of the maximum-permitted first floor area , at 41505 C . R. 48 , Southold , NY; County Tax Map Parcel No . 1000-059-03-023 . The Chairman opened the hearing at 7 : 50 o ' clock p .m. and read the legal notice of this hearing in its entirety and appeal application. MR. CHAIRMAN : We have a copy of a site plan , proposed by Garrett Strang on 4/16/84 indicating the building and the parking lot area . And I have .a first-floor plan . I do not have a second-floor plan . Ok . Is there somebody that would Iike . to be heard in behalf of this applica- tion? Mr. Price . IRVING L . PRICE , JR. , ESQ . : I ' m Irving Price , lawyer with offices at Greenport , on this application in behalf of Doctor Huberman . There ' s one matter I would like to bring up for the record at the present time , is that th__e site plan as submitted was dated 4/16/84 but it was also revised on July 7th', . 1.984 . MR. CHAIRMAN : I have July 2nd. MR. PRICE : Yeah . MR. CHAIRMAN : Ok . MR. PRICE : This is an application to have the doctor ' s office in a residential building in a_ residential district. The building as proposed meets all the requirements as to. percentage of the area of the premises being occupied , the side lines , the setbacks , and the ordinance provides as stated in the ap.plication that a home occupation for a professional is permitted as long as the office use is limited to 30%. of the total area of the residence , and then to ' avoid any ques- tion as to parking provisions , further on it provides that a doctor ' s..' office has _to provide five parking spaces for each physician . This is a. one-man practice , and as you see the site plan provides for 10 spaces . The offices are modern doctors , are for the practice of modern medicine , require more than one room , and I believe that the. ordinance itself probably should be amended. When this .ordinance was propounded , Southold Town Board o.r Appeals -6- September io , 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3262 - J . P . HUBERMAN , continued : ) MR. PRICE (continued) : thirty percent was probably correct percentage . But now with the . present usage , 30% is too little , and it is respectfully requested that . a variance be granted for the use as provided on. .the site plan . MR. CHAIRMAN : Mr. Price , I see that Dr. Huberman is with us in attendance . I was wondering if he could tell the board why he requires 25300 sq . ft. though ... DR. HUBERMAN : The exact dimensions of the office had not been decided . We submitted that as the very maximum. It may not be that much . MR. CHAIRMAN : But you feel you need the entire . ground floor area? DR. HUBERMAN : Well , the minimum , the very minimum would be 15500 sq . ft , Well , if' that represented 30% of the entire first floor structure , you ' d have four. or five thousand square feet. It would be an enormous structure . It ' s impossible. MR. CHAIRMAN : Right . . Would there be any other practitioners aside from yourself using this?'-... DR. HUBERMAN : It ' s possible in the future I might have an associate who would work there with me . I_n the same specialty . At the moment there would not be . MR. CHAIRMAN : I thank you very much , Doctor . Did you have anything to add to that , Mr. Price? MR . PRICE: Yes , one thing . MR. CHAIRMAN : Go ahead. MR . PRICE : I believe an inspection of .that area will show that it'.s. zoned commercial within 300 feet , 200 feet .back on the corner of Kenny ' s. Road , the '.northwe.st corner of Kenny ' s. Road , and at across the street there ' s. either a commercial ._building , It..: s not exactly all residential - in that immediate area , there -are-certain commercial__ . structures_. But this is a permitted use in a residential area and the variance is only for the amount of use of this building . I have the architect here__if .you have any questions to ask . MR. CHAIRMAN : Do you have any questions , gentlemen , about this? ( Board.-members nodded in the negati.ve.. ) MR . CHAIRMAN : No , I just want to say in comment that I hope you ' re aware Mr: Price that this particular board is extremely aware of the need for practitioners , such a's .Dr . Huberman , in :th:is_ parti - cular town . And we have in the past , I can mention two recently : Dr. Slotkin and Dr. Mercier , both of ,which have gotten variances from Southold Town Board of Appeals -7- September 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3262 - J . P . HUBERMAN , continued : ) MR. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER (continued) : this board , and I also am aware of the fact that there. is . a timeliness involved here , which you made my secretary well aware of some time ago . And although we have not discussed this application , except really to look at the property and look at it , we ' 11 _have a decision for you in the very , very near future and it probably will not be tonight ,_ but it will be in the very near future . _Ok? An_d thank you . MR. PRICE: Thank you , Mr . Chairman and members of the board. MR. CHAIRMAN : Is there anybody else that would like to speak in behalf of this application? _Anybody. like to speak against the application? MR . HEINISCH: Yes. I would . My name is Bernard Heinisch , H-e-i -n-i-s-c-h. I ' m the owner of the adjacent property to the west. The hardship as so described is a hardship self-inflicted. There ' s no reason why a doctor has to build a home utilizing 100% of the first floor area , 2 ,300 sq . ft . for one persona I believe the zoning code calls for a stipulation that he must reside and .that only person plus one assistant could be in the particular zone . All the adjacent property to this is residential . I have a, petition I will give you with approximately 29 names on it asking for your denial on this petition . Also ,. on your Master Zoning Map , all of this property is shown as A-1 . Residential - Farming area . I don ' t know if the doctor knows if the code also and I believe states that he must reside and it ' s hard to believe that 1 ,000 sq . ft. for residential on the second floor because there ' s no floor plan of the second floor submitted , that would be sufficient for two people .to live in , with 2 , 300 sq . ft. on the first floor. It appears that he comme.rcializing residential property . There is sufficient commercial property for sale east of this particular piece .of' property. There ' s also a professional center , Windsway , right up the street on the east side of this property , on the south side of County Road 48 . MR. CHAIRMAN : Thank you , Mr. Heinisch. (Mr . Heinisch submitted the above-named petition in opposition for the record . ) MR. PRICE : Mr . Chairman , may I say something for one moment? MR. CHAIRMAN : Yes', in one moment please . MR. CHAIRMAN : Ok , Mr . Price . MR. PRICE: In answer to Mr. Heinisch , I believe he said his name is . MR:: CHAIRMAN : Heinisch . MR. PRICE : I just wanted to point out that this is a permitted use in ' a residential area and that all the variance is being. asked for is .to use more than 30% of the residence . A Southold :Town Board oT Appeals -8- September 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal. No. 3262 = J .P.' .HUBERMAN , continued: ) MR. GHAJ..RM.AN.:. Doctor , could I ask you one more .question? I would assume ' by the-floor plan that you. have submitted that you do intend to live in this residence , or' you intend to live on this .site with "a second story? DR. HUBERMAN : I would be living there part-time . MR. CHAIRMAN : But nobo'd y else would be living there? DR. HUBERMAN : Nobody else would be living there . MR. CHAIRMAN : You wouldn ' t. be renting it to anyone else? DR. HUBERMAN : Absolutely not. MR . CHAIRMAN : Could you give us an idea on how much time you would be utilizing the living area? DR. HUBERMAN: I sleep over out here every week the night before I operate , and I ' d. be us_ing.. the living quarters on weekends . Possibly 50% of the time . MR . CHAIRMAN : Would you be operating from this building? You wouldn ' t be operating from this building , th.at would still be._ in Eastern Long _Island Hospital ? DR. HUBERMAN : I wouldn ' t be doing any major surgery , I ' d. be doing minor eye - surgery . MR. CHAIRMAN : 1I thank you again . Does anybody else have any comments concerning this appl.,ication? Questions-. from board members ? Serge? Any other .question_s ,_ Mr. Heinis_ch? . No? Hearing no further questions ,._ I ' ll make a motion closing the hearing and reserving decision until later. MR. HEINISCH : I would like to ask , will I be sent a notice of decision? MR. CHAIRMAN : No , you would not but you 're welcome to call the board based upon our next meeting date ._ I would suggest cal._ling a week from Friday , a we.ek from tomorrow , and, we usually, have a._ Special Meeting seven to 10-- days after the Regular Monthly meeting t_o discuss these applicat_ions .__ . It really dep_en_ds on how. _Long we ._go tonight , ok . If there is any deliberation or not . That _is _all I__ can suggest. Thank you very__ much everybody for coming in . On motion by Mr . Goehringer , seconded by Mr . Doyen , it was RESOLVED, to close the hearing and reserve decision in the -- matter of _Appeal No ._ 3262 , 'J :P . 'HUBERMAN . Vote -of .the. Board : Aye-s : Messrs . Goehringer , Doyen , Grigonis , Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution wa_s adopted by unanimous- vote of all the members . Southold Town Board of Appeals -9- September 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No . 3265 . Application of FRED H . and GEORGIA LAMBROU , One Canaan Close , New Canaan , CT 06840 , for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance , Article III ; Section 100-32 for permission to locate accessory garage-story building in- the frontyard area at 1365 q.uavi.ew Avenue , East Marion , NY; County Tax Map Parcel No . 1000-022-02-0.1. . The Chairman opened the hearing at 8 :05 p .m. and read the legal notice of this hearing in its e.ntirety and appeal application . ,. MR . CHAIRMAN : We have a copy of plans indicating a garage of approximately 24 ' by 24e ' We also have, a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this and surrounding properties in the area. I have a copy of a building permit appl. ,cation which indicates the proposed placement of 28 feet from the east line and 20 feet from Aquaview Avenue . Would somebody like to be heard in behalf of this application? FRED LAMBROU: I ' m the applicant , Fred Lambrou. I don ' t have anything further to add. I think I was quite complete in that. I do want . to .point out that since I filed the application there was a garage built across the street from me which . is a four-car garage . I don ' t. know_ if .that was a two-ca.r garage and now is a .four-car garage , so this would not be an unusual . situation . I thank you . MR. CHAIRMAN : Mr. Lambrou , in dealing with applications of this nature , this board. does place restrictions on these structures , such as the building shall never be converted to sleeping quarters, apartment--rental , so on and so forth . Do you have.- any objection to that? MR. LAMBR'OU : No . I understand that. MR. CHAIRMAN : Ok. Thank you . Is there .anybody else that would like to speak in behalf of this application? Anyone against this application? Questions from board_._Members? (None ) All right , hearing no further questions , I ' ll make a motion granting this application-, approving it with the following condition , that it always remain as a storage building-_ and that it not be used for a_ny ..habitable occupancy .. . The. board made the following fi.n.dings and determination : . 'By this appeal , applicants seek to. locate a 24 '. x 24 ' two-car accessory garage in _the .frontyard area of .the premises in que.s.ti-on , approximately 20 feet north of .Aquaview .Ave.nue_. and 28 feet.- wrest of. . the ea.sterl_y.-side_- property. 1 ine The premises in question is located on. the north .side of Southo.l.d .To.w.n. .Board of. Appeals -10-. September, l3 ,.. 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3265 - FRED H . AND GEORGIA LAMBROU , continued: ) Aquaview. Avenue , East Marion , with a lot width of approximately 151 feet and lot depth of approximately 320 feet. The premises contains an area of approximately . 80 of an acre ._and fronts along the Long Island Sound . The rearyard area of the subject parcel consists of several well -maintained- trees which are needed to support the high bluff area. The premises is improved with a two-story one-family frame dwelling, which is set back approximately 100 feet from the front property line . For the record , it is noted that similar relief was granted to .the easterly adjoining property under„ A.pp.eal No . 2686 on May 1 , 1980.. The bo.a.rd agrees with the _reasoning of the applicants . _. In considering this appeal , the board has determined : (a ) that the relief requested is not substantial in relation to the zoning requirements (b.) that by granting of the. relief. requested , the character of the neighborhood will not be adversely affected or changed; (c ) by allowing the variance , no substantial detriment to adjoining properties would be created; '(d ) no adverse effects will be produced on available governmental facilities if the variance is all (e ) that the interests of justice will_ be served by allowing the variance , as noted below. Now, therefore , on motion by Mr . Goehringer , seconded by Mr. Grigonis , it was RESOLVED , that Appe.al No . 3265 , application for FRED H . AND GEORGIA LAMBROU for permission to locate 24 ' by 24 ' accessory garage- storage building. in the frontyard area approximately 28 ' from the east side property line' and not less than 20 ' from the front property Iine ,' ' BE AND' HEREBY' IS'APPROVED'AS'APPLIED'AND SUBJECT TO'THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1 . The subject accessory building shall be used for storage purposes only and 2. The subject accessory building shall not be used for habitable occupancy. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of the members. PUBLIC HEARING : Appeal No . 3264. Application of PATRICIA AND REINER LOLLOT, 2345 P1um. Isla►id Lane , Orient , N.Y for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance,., Arti.cle .XI , Section 100-119-1 (A) for permission to erect fence exceeding the maximum four-foot height requirement along frontyard area of this vacant parcel , 1120 Ryder Farm Lane and Uhl Lane , Orient; Orient-By-The-Sea Filed Map 6160 , Lot 157'; County Tax Map Parcel No . 100.0-.015-05-024 . 11 . The Chairman opened the hearing at 8 : 08 p .m. and read the legal notice of this hearing in its entirety and appeal application. MR. CHAIRMAN : We have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map . I have a copy of a building permit application , which indicates a five-foot fence around the periphery of the property . It does not indicate how far from the property line this fence lies . Would Southold Town Board of Appeals -11 - September. 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting .(Appeal No . 3264 - PATRICIA AND 'REINER 'LOLLOT, continued: ) MR . CHAIRMAN (continued) : somebody like to speak in behalf of this application? Yes , can I have your.-name please? PATRICIA LOLLOT: Mr. Chairman and gentlemen of the board. I am Patricia Lollot. I am filing for this variance . I_ feel that we have interpolated as . best we can . .. If you have any questions ,. we are here to answer them. MR. CHAIRMAN : I noticed in the. building permit you have changed the course of the fence in the corner, and it does not appear that that is the way it looks when we were out.-to see the property , Mrs . Lollot: MRS . LOLLOT: My husband perhaps could answer that better. What we do is , we _normally, try to contour it like you see at the : Big Horse Farm , rounding the_ corner.s . We were not expeditious to. do so . We made ._them at right_. angles . MR. CHAIRMAN: What we are rather concerned with at this particular time , since the fence does exist , is to ask you to go to the building department. and apply for a building . permit for the purpose of placing such an animal on this. parcel . Ok? And we would therefore offer to you a recess .of this hearing until you do that.... . MRS . LOLLOT: All right. One thing I want to make clear is that the animals are not being housed there . They are housed on our property where our house is under the accessory ruling. This vacant lot, is _being used merely as a riding area . The animals are there for maybe an hour or two a day and then brought into the , under the accessory land use building where there are stables . And what we are just looking for here is a safety feature so that vehicular traffic doesn ' t startle the animals and cause possibly, injury to ourselves , or anyone else riding or driving by . MR. CHAIRMAN : I understand that completely . That why I don ' t want to close this hearing. I would like y_ou to. make the .application simultaneously while this application. is still open for .the purpose of housing this animal on thi..s particular parcel of property. Not housing it-- i,t ' s. actually .a use , ok . It' s an accessory use on this p.articu_lar parcel of property , and that' s all I can suggest to you at this _p.articular. time. We can ' t grant a fence knowing what you are going to -use it for until such time you know that you are allowed to keep the animal for the time limit that you intend to keep it on this property . You know , whatever the time .is , on the daily ba.sis . MRS . LOLLOT: It just seems rather inconsistent , Sir , that if you should tell me tha.t. I didn ' t have thisTfenced in , I could ride the _horse for a day there , but because we have.._a fence there , I__ have to go to apply for a variance and permission to .ride on it. Southold Town Board oT Appeals -12- Septemaer 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3264 - PATRICIA AND REINER LOLLOT , continued : ) MR . CHAIRMAN : Well only because the fence exceeds four feet. And that ' s-- MRS. LOLLOT: Well that would only be the front . You could put an 8' stockade I suppose on three sides---- MR. CHAIRMAN : Six feet . MRS . LOLLOT: Six feet stockade . It just seems very inconsistent. We will do whatever you Want , 'but to go for. that when you can ride all day without the fence on the property , it ' s just as I say , quite inconsistent. MR. CHAIRMAN : I can ' t agree with you on this particular situation only because we ' re guided by counsel on this . And secondly , I would ask you if you will just furnish us. with a copy of the covenants and restrictions of the subdivision , and make sure that we are not violating any covenants and restrictions . MRS . LOLLOT: Well , they have. .been lifted because we received written permission from the developer at the time we built the barn. which essentially he approved the building plans , he approved the fact that we wanted _to.:. stable horses on the property with our house , and everything was approved and . essentially he meant by doing so lifted the covenant. MR . CHAIRMAN : How long ago was that , Mrs . Lollot? MRS . LOLLOT: A little over a year ago . MR. CHAIRMAN : All right , if you would just give us that in the form of a statement. so that we co.ul._d put i_t in the file at the same time when we receive the building .permit , and we ' ll_ recess this until the next Regular Meeting so :that we don' t have to. .re-advertise . All right?. MRS . LOLLOT: Thank you . MR. CHAIRMAN : Thank you . Anybody else like to speak in behalf of this application? Aga.inst :.the:�application?. Questions . from board members? .(None ) Hearing no furthe.r, _questions , ..I ' ll make, a motion recessing this hearing until the. next Regular Meeting . On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded ' by Mr. Sawicki , it was RESOLVED , to recess Appeal No . 3264, matter of PATRICIA 'AND REINER LOLLOT, until the next Regular Meeting of this_ Board . Vote of the Board : Byes : Messrs . Goehringer , Grigonis , Doyen , Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution was adopted by unantmous .vote of all the members . Southold Town Board of Appeals -13- September 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting PUBLIC HEARING : Appeal No . 3267 . Application of CONSTANCE KLAPPER , Box 291 , Cutchogue , NY by Esseks , Hefter , Cuddy & Angel ) for a Variance to -the Zoning Ordinance , Article III , Section 100731 , for approval of insufficient area of lot in this proposed two-lot division (redivision ) .of land and for approval of insufficient . livable floor area of existing principal , building . Location of Property : 3300 Dignans (private ) Road , . Cutchogue , NY; County Tax Map Parcel No . 1000-83-02-005. The Chairman opened thehearing at 8:.16 .p .m. and read the legal notice of this hearing in its,, entirety and appeal application. MR. CHAIRMAN : We have a copy of the Suffo.lk . County. Tax Map and a survey dated December 20 , 1983 ,. indicating the nature of .this particular parcel to be divided of .approximately, l .2 .acres approxi - mately 125 ' on Long Island Sound and .-approximately 268 fe t on a e private road . Would somebody like to be heard in behalf of this _application? Mr. _Angel ? CHARLES CUDDY , ESQ . : He has blond hair , I don.' t... I 'm. Mr. 'Cud'dy. MR . CHAIRMAN : Oh , Mr. Cuddy, I apologize . - MR . CUDDY: I really appear on beh,alf .not only of Mrs . K:l.apper but my partner , Bill Esseks..,_ who handled this f le mast of .the way and who unfortunately couldn ' t. be here this ev-en-ing. This matter has been before your board before in connection with a third lot that was separated off .a period back and actually was an 'access variance . ' The two lots that are here have been a royed I think pp your records should show...the Planni- ng- . Board just recently approved this subdi vi si ori . The subdi:visio-n itself - is si._mp'ly an existing house that has 2 ..2 .acres and . _another house that has, 1 . 2 acres . It certainly cannot upset the board because the houses have been there for -years and years . Mrs . Mapper has indicated to me that when she bought it , she understood. that she was buying what amounted to three lots . Apparently, 'there has been some confusion going back and forth between this board , the Planning Board. It went to D. E.C . They have . approv,al from all the boards and now they look for. -your board ' s. approv.al . I _would ask at this time based upon the Planning Board ap_.proval_, based upon the area ,. i.t.'.:s;.7 small area but .in ' very large area , that the board and based upon the_ history , 'deed'w.ise.:th,is property , and sometimes it ' s. unmerged and then un-fortunately they ' re back-_ in the same name , that the board as a matter of justice grant the application . And Mrs . Klapper is here as wel 1 _as- Mr. Klapper to answer any questions - of, .you ._-- MR. CHAIRMAN: Could you tell me the approximate square footage of the studi o in question and the nature of.._a portion of .this_-- appl.._i ca- tion-- MR. .CUDDY : I understand it ' s. somewhere between 250 and 300 sq . ft . Southold Town Board of Appeals -14- September 1j , 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3267 - CONSTANCE KLAPPER , continued : ) MR . CHAIRMAN : As it ' s presently rented at this ti.me .as a yearround structure? MR. CUDDY : Yes . And it has been that way for years . MR. CHAIRMAN : As you know , it has not been the nature of this board in situations like this to grant undersized structures-- I ' m still referring to it as a structure and not a dwelling , of this nature . This board has not deliberated upon this , and so .I don ' t know what the feeling of the board is , ok? The closest one that I can recollect is one that we had divided in Laurel last year , and that building was approximately 750 sq . ft. The board so indicated that that building. had to be brought up to 850 sq . ft . As I said , I ' have. not discussed this application with the board at this particular time . Do the Klappers have any idea how long this building has been in existence? MR . CUDDY : They could testify to that . Mr. Klapper. MR. KLAPPER: It was there long before we bought our lot . I haven ' t been able to find out exactly when , but it has been there and rented over the years . It has everything in it. -MR. CHAIRMAN : It has a separate well , Mr. Klapper? MR. KLAPPER: Yes-- no , it has a separate cesspool . The well is connected to our well . But there are separate pipes involved. We have a large well. MR . CHAIRMAN : How is it heated , Mr. Klapper? MR. KLAPPER: It ' s oil , hot air. MR. CHAIRMAN : Does it have a basement? MR . KLAPPER: '. It has a four or five foot crawl space . It' s a solid building . It ' s insulated . And i.t has been used all the time . What our intentions , what we did when we first bought the property , we sold off the original piece and from the same map that when we bought it that was given to us , the same survey. When the Zoning Board of Appeals approved selling off that first parcel and we have to improve the road , which the Zon.ing Board of Appeals and the Building Department approved, we were. under the impression that we had the other two separate . We didn ' t know anything about it not being separated until the two-acre zoning was imminent , we tried , we put the second parcel--they were both in my wife ' s name , and we. put the second parcel i.n my name , we found out that it had never been subdivided. Until that point , about eight or nine years , we thought that it had been separate . What we always intended to do was the house on the two acres is a large house , we ' re only the two of us , so we always intended and still do that it , you know , at the time that we retire we would sell the large parcel and expand the small house and live there . And we still intend to do it. As I said , I always expected Southold Town Board oT Hppeals - 15- September 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3267 - CONSTANCE KLAPPER, continued : ) MR . KLAPPER (continued) : that these were three parcels when we had one sold off. MR. CHAIRMAN : Going back to the structure again which you refer to as the studio on this map , is there any C of 0 or. anything from the Building Department that you received on that? MR. KLAPPER: I have a C of 0 on the entire thing which says , the best I can recall , says a house , a cottage , with the cottage on the second parcel , and there ' s a C of 0 on that. MR. CHAIRMAN : In other words , the original C of 0 said that , referred to this studio as a cottage? MR. KLAPPER: Yes . MR . CHAIRMAN : All right. I thank you very much , Mr . Klapper . MR . KLAPPER: Thank you . MR. CHAIRMAN : Do you have anything to add to that , Mr . Cuddy? MR . CUDDY : If it would help .the board , we could submit an affidavit indicating the date of construction the best we can-. determine it , for the smaller dwelling which is on the second lot. We believe that dwelling has been there for years prior to the zoning ordinance . They have a preexisting use certificate asJ' i.nd.icated ',..on the existing larger parcel , and on the basis that we can do so , I think that would support the preexisting use . MR . CHAIRMAN : Would you like me to close the hearing then after further testimony , and then you ' ll give us that some time later? MR. CUDDY : Yes . MR. CHAIRMAN : Ok . So then therefore when I do close the hearing I ' ll close it pending that particular receipt . BUILDING INSPECTOR LESSARD: Mr. Chairman , if I may throw some light on the whole thing . Originally , the first piece was bought in 1967 , ' 66 . The second piece was bought _in 1967 . The third piece was bought in ' 72 I believe , and the people got a set-off, I believe that '. s what you ' re referring to with your 280-A, at the time that second building originally was an art studio , and th- 1975 ehbuilding permit was obtained and a C . O . that it converted to a cottage . And that ' s where it stands . He has a C. O. for that as a cottage . It was converted from an art studio as it was so-called originally way back . Before zoning by the way . _ MR. CHAIRMAN : Could you furnish us with a copy of that , Mr. Cuddy? Is that what you can ' t .find , Mr. Klapper? Southold Town Board of Appeals -16- September 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3267 - CONSTANCE KLAPPER, continued : ) MR . C.UDDY : The C. O : ? This ' is . a .copy of the Certificate of Occupancy for the purpose of the record , Z6523 , June 13 , 1975. It says , " Private one-family dwelling with accessory garage and a studio cottage . " I ' ll hand this up to the board. MR. CHAIRMAN : Is that a copy that we can keep? MR. CUDDY : Yes . MR. CHAIRMAN : Thank you . (Copy of Z6523 , June . 13 , 1975 Certificate of Occupancy submitted as.,part of the record. ) MR . CHAIRMAN : Is there anybody else that would like to speak in behalf of this application? Would anybody like to speak against the application? Questions from boar..d members? (None ) Anything else , Mr . Lessard? B . I . LESSARD: No . MR . CHAIRMAN : Thank you for your input. B . I . LESSARD : To make it so there ' s no confusion .because the property was bought at three different times , the people that owned it was under the impression that they had three separate lots , ok , and at the time the studio was on a second lot but it was purchased at a different time , that ' s why they were under that impression . And then they merged together , and that ' s when they found out they didn ' t have what they thought they did . MR . CHAIRMAN : Can I just ask you , Mr . Lessard , what is your deter- mination of studio and guest cottage as being a part of this C. O. What are your feelings concerning this , as a permanent structure? B . I . LESSARD: As the plans were submitted , the building permit indicated to be a yearround dwelling , and I believe in ' 75 the 850 sq . ft . requirement was not in effect , so probably that ' s why it i.s the size that it is . Actually it is a second dwelling , period . You know, call it a cottage because it' s small , but it is actually a one-family dwelling . MR. CHAIRMAN : I hope you don ' t mind this interrogation , but we are just trying to get the history on this , which you would only get this way if we couldn ' t have this discourse . We would still be confused. Did you want to say something , Mrs . Klapp.er? MRS . KLAPPER: I just wanted to add . that ; when we purchased the property there was someone living in the studio . They left , and we used it for one summer , and then since them it for about the last six years , a school teacher has been living there and she was living with her son who just went off to college . MR. CHAIRMAN : Thank you very much . Are there any other questions from anyone concerning this application? (None ) Southold Town Board or appeals - 17- September 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3267 - CONSTANCE KLAPPER, continued : ) MR . CHAIRMAN : Hearing no further questions , I ' ll make a motion closing the hearing pending receipt of a sworn affidavit concerning this Structure or cottage . MEMBER SAWICKI : Second On motion by Mr. Goehringer , seconded by Mr . Sawicki , it was RESOLVED to close the hearing pending receipt of an affidavit con- cerning the use of the "studio-cottage" structure . Vote .of the Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Doyen , Grigonis , Douglass and Doyen . This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of all the members . At 8 : 35 p .m. , motion was made by Mr . Goehringer , seconded by Mr . Sawicki , and duly carried , to recess for five minutes . At 8 : 43 p .m. , motion was made by Mr . Sawicki , seconded by Mr. Goehringer , to reconvene the Regular Meeting . Vote of the Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Doyen , Grigonis , Douglass and Doyen . This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of all the members . ,:PUBLIC_=HEARING: Appeal No.. 3242 . In the Matter of . HENRY - DOMALESKI for Variances : (a ) to New York Town Law , Section 28 -A for approval of access , and (b ) to Article III , Section 100-31 ': for approval of w:i-dth . R-0-W off N/S Oregon Road , Cutchogue ; 1000-095- 01 -part of 11 . The Chairman opened,.-the hear'ing��At 8:.44 _p .m. - and read the legal notice of hearing in its entirety and appeal application . MR. CHAIRMAN : I have a copy of a survey prepared by Young and Young dated February 28 , 1984 indicating a right-of-way of _some great length , and Lot #1 containing 1 . 949 acres and Lot #2 of 2.. 051 acres , and I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this and surrounding properties in the area . Miss Wickham, would you like to be heard in behalf of this application? ABIGAIL WICKHAM, ESQ . : Thank you . I don ' t have too much to say other than the fact that this farm _is only 300 feet wide and that creates a hardship . You just can ' t get two 175_ foot lots without doing a lot line . ' It seems unfair to require just one waterfront lot of 300 feet in width when 160 feet really is more than adequate to construct a residence , and we have gone.- south far enough to create the Southold Town Board or Appeals -18- September 1j , 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3242 = HENRY DOMALESKI , continued : ) A. WICKHAM (continued) : required two-acre zoning lot . With regard to the access , I ' d. just like to note that there is a. proposed 25- foot right-of-.way a,ll the way up from Oregon Road . Glen Court which.. is in _the, Birch- H _,,i1._1 Subdivision to the east is a private road and consent has not been obtained from the owners in that subdivision to use that road, so that ' s why were _providing for a private 25-foot road . MR . CHAIRMAN : Ok . Wh,ile' y.ou ' re up there , let me tell you what has transpired. We , as you know, 'a_lways send out the. Town En_gin_eer on these private roads . We have not' done . that in this partic.ular .case because of vacations and so on and so forth at this particular time , but we will contact Mr . Davis in the very near future . I would, like to recess this hearing until such time that we get his report because it may not be forthcoming .by the t;i.me we -have _to make a decision and I would like to recess this..until possibly the next reg.ula.rly scheduled meeting._, and then reopen it at that particular time_. __ Of._ course , I ' ll take any testi - mony tonight i'f:;.anybody would like to--.add to this application . _ .However , as you know we don ' t deal with this until we deal with the engineer ' s. report-- I say we don ' t deal with that, we don ' t. ._de.al with the nature of the condition of the right-of-way until such time that we have the engineer ' s report which we don ' t have _at this time . So , do' .you have any objection to that , MIsS WICKHAM: If that could go on the next meeting , that would be acceptable . MR. CHAIRMAN : Ok . Is there anything else you would like to add? MISS WICKHAM: No . I have nothing else to add. MR . CHAIRMAN : Would anybody else like to speak in behalf of this application? Anybody to speak against the application? Questions from . board members? _(None ) Hearing .no-Yfurther questions , I ' ll make the motion recessing this particular application until the next regularly scheduled meeting . On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Sawicki and Mr . Doug- lass , it was _ RESOLVED , to recess Appeal. No . 3242 , matter of 'HENRY 'DOMALESKI until the next Regular Mee.ting_ of the board . Vote of the Board: Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer, Doyen, Grigo.nis , Douglass and Doyen . This resolution was adopted by un_ani_mou_s. _vote .of all the members, _.. Southold Town Board of ..ppeals -1.9- Septembe 3 , 1984 Regular Meeting PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No . 3269 . Upon application of THOMAS AND JACQUELINE OCCHIOGROSSO , 77 Vanderbilt Boulevard , Oakdale , NY_ (6y Scheinberg , DePetris and Pruzansky) for a Variance to the Zoning Ordi - nance , Article III , Section 100-31 for approval of the construction of a new one-family dwelling with - an insufficient frontyard setback of 121 feet (reduction of that granted under .Appeal No . 3031 , 1 /27/83) . Location of Property : 1580 Corey Creek Lane , Southold , NY ; Corey Creek Estates Filed Map #4923 , Lot 28 ; County Tax Map Parcel No . 1000-78-04-019. The Chairman opened the hearing at p .m. and read the legal notice of hearing in its entirety and appeal application . MR. CHAIRMAN : I have a copy of a survey of August'. 23 , -: 1981 , and then further amended to July 6 , 1984 , indicating the size of the parcel in question referred to as Lot No . 28 of Corey Creek Estates , and indicating the lap measurements , the size of the concrete existing foundation which lies approximately 122 feet from Corey Creek Lane . I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this and sur- rounding properties in the area . Would you like to be heard in behalf of your application? JANET GEASA, ESQ . : Good evening . My name is Janet Geasa . I am associated with Scheinberg , DePetris and Pruzansky . All that informa- tion in the application was to present you with the background of the case . As you can see in the papers submitted , the Occhiogrossos have come up again with an extreme case of practical ,difficulty in building on the property . First of all , the virtue of the fact of the shape of the property itself. Corey Creek Lane goes around the property on two sides , and in turn it goes down to the south . Therefore , the property is _preserted with basically two frontages , therefore , you have to keep the house b6ck off the front pieces of the property. . In addition , there ' s the water south of the property , meaning that the house has to be kept back from the mean high water line there . On the western portions of the property , you have the wetlands , and has been explained , the Environmental Agency ' s concern has indicated to the Occhiogrossos that they want to keep him at all costs off the wetland on the western portion .of the property . Therefore , the Occhiogrossos .cannot build their house under the terms of .the prior variance . As indicated before , as the D. E . C . told Mr. . Occhiogrosso that he should push the house as easterly as possible . They gave him a setback of,,,-variations of setback of 13 feet from the eastern property line . The Department of Health also approved that location and stamped their approval on the maps with the 13 ' setback . Subsequent to the Zoning Board' s granting of the prior variance for a 20 ' setback , Mr . Occhiogrosso went to the Town Wetlands . They also gave him a 13 ' setback , so as you can see it was quite confusing to the Occhiogrossos .-:...'. We'.all know that when .a}] . conflict occurs , the Zoning Board shall supercede all others ; however , 'Southold . Town Board of Hppeals -20- September 13 , iv84 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3269 - OCCHIOGROSSO, continued : ) MS . GEASA , ESQ . (continued) : they were. unaware of that. I would like to say also that the present request is reasonable in that the . house is reasonable in size ; it fits in the general character of the neighborhood. It' s not an overly large house . . It ' s a .very .reasonable sized house . The garage which is on the normally northeasterly portion of the house is a reasonable request . It ' s not unusual for any house to have a garage on it . I would also like to state that most of the building- that is being constructed is in compliance with the variance , 20 feet back from the street. The house itself is 20 feet back from the street. If. °t .weren ' t for the turn in .that particular area , the whole structure would in fact. be 20 ' back . In addition , the setbacks that we ' re requesting would not adversely affect the area . As I said only a- small portion of the house is in violation . I would like to point out that the setback requested will not harm anyone in the area . : The only lot that would be affected would "be directly across the street. That lot is all marshland , presently vacant , and it ' s my understanding that it would not even be a buildable piece . It ' s all wetlands in there . And that is really the only other problem that would be affected by this request . In addition , I would like to explain that Mr . Occhiogrosso , as I said before , proceeded -- he did violate his prior variance , but he did so out of confusion over whose ruling to follow. I.t has been stated by other people in addition to myself after reviewing all the . papers , that it would be much easier if this was a unified procedure and that all the agencies involved to get together and issue one ruling ; however , it ' s not. And Mr Occhiogrosso did go to the Town Wetlands for:-the town wetlands permit after the Zoning Board issued the prior variance , and they told him 13 feet was fine . He assumed that was the last ruling on the subject. . . I thihL th :s- indicates that the Occhiogrossos had made a good faith effort to comply with every agency that' s necessary to comply with . They have been going back and forth on this now since 1979. Every,:t.ime someone told them to go somewhere , they went there , and asked where should be build the house , - and they were told different things , .and they followed the last piece of advice that they got . I think it ' s clear that they would never have proceeded purposely in violation of the zoning board simply by virtue of the fact that it had had problems with the town before with regards to the fill of the property . The town building inspector had been down several times , therefore indicating that the Occhiogrossos knew what was going on and the property was being watched. Therefore , it would be quite foolish of them and financially wasteful to go ahead purposefully in violation of their prior variance . I would also like to say that they should not be punished by the zoning board for having made a mistake since we believe we have reasonable grounds for, the request I am making , I don ' t think it should be held against them , that they made a mistake and they were in violation of their prior variance . Southold Town Board o-c .ppeals -21 - September 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3269 - OCCHIOGROSSO, continued : ) MS . GEASA, ESQ. (continued) : Finally , I would like to indicate that i..f. .the Zoning Board does approve this variance request , all the agency rulings will be in compliance , and if they don ' t , I_ really don ' t see how it would be possible that they could build any house on the lot given the size of the lot and the surrounding area . They would be pushed right back into the wetlands and therefore would be in violation of the D. E . C . ruling and the town wetland:: . MR. CHAIRMAN : Thank you . Is there anyone else wishing to be heard in behalf of this application? ( No r.esponse . ) . Would anybody like to speak,., against the _application? (No response . ) Questions _ from the board members? (None ) Do you have anything further , Counsellor, you would like to say? (None ) Hearing no further questions, I ' ll make a motion closing the hearing and reserving decision until some time in the near future . On motion by Mr. Goehringer , seconded by Mr . RESOLVED, to close the hearing and reserve decision in the matter of Appeal No . 3269, for THOMAS AND JACQUE.LINE -000H.IOGROSSO% Vote of the Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Doyen , Grigonis , Douglass and Doyen . . This resolution was adopted by. unanimous vote of all the members . RECESSED HEARING from July .26,, *1984 : H.E.NRY Pm SMITH 'by Philip J . Ofri as-- Es'q This matter was rea.dverti s.ed in'-the Suffo.l_k Times and L" ,:I'.. Tray.e.l_er-Watchman . No one appeared ,either in - behalf .or against the application , and inasmuch as ._the. .board.::.members ' had questions to ask of the applicant and his attorney ,: the f.o.11o-wing resolution was adopted: _.. _.. On motion 'by Mr . Goehringer, seconded by Mr . Sawicki , it was RESOLVED - to 'fur,ther. 'recess Appeal. .No . 3206 , An .the matter of HENRY ..P . SM.ITH wi.tho.ut date at this time. in - order .to al l ow. .the appl._i"cant and:- his . attorney, to be present. for :,:questions. before closing the hearing . Vote of the. Board : Ayes Messrs . Goehrin.ger, Doyen,, Grigo.nis , Douglass and Doyen . . This resolution. was adopted 'by_ unanimous vote. '_of . all the members-. PUBLIC HE"ARI`NG : Appeal No. .3200 .. ROBE.RT -'E.NT.ENMA.NN 'by. Abiga'il ' A. Wickham , Es'q . Variance to the Zo.ning. Ord. nance 'Arti.;cl,e III, Section 100-.31 Bulk Schedule , for appr. ov.al of i"nsuffi,cient area and_ width 'of parcel to be set-off, n._.this ._proposed three_-_lot subdivision "of land located at the north side of _Sound 'Avenue, M_atti'.tu.ck , 'NY Caunt,y. Tax Map Parcello. 1000:-112-1 -7 . Southold Town Board of Appeals -22- September 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3200 .- ROBERT ENTENMANN , continued : ) The Chairman opened the hearing at 9 : 00 p .m. and read the legal notice of hearing in its entirety and appeal application . MR . CHAIRMAN : I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicat- ing and surrounding properties a_nd a copy of. a survey prepared by Roderick VanTuyl , , P . C. August 23 , 1983. .indicating Parcel #1 of approximately 1 .239 acres , 75 ' by 722 irregularly ; and the other two parcels as mentioned in the application . Mi-ss __Wickham , would you like to be heard in behalf of this application? - MISS WICKHAM: The lots that you see on the tax map to the east of the property was apparently cut out many years ago. leaving the 75 ' strip that goes up to the Sound . The immediately adjoining. lot to the east-Js 75 feet . There are others both in that. section and further to the east which are about 100 feet wide . Without this variance , that. 75 ' is really worthless because you ' d. be losing that as a buildable parcel and it ' s not suitable for farming which .is the use .that ' s. being _.p.ut on the,,--rest of the property . When I was in front of .the Planning- Board , they discussed_- the possibility of' increasing. the size 'by -making .an "L-shaped" appendage to the south and that was decided against because it really wo.uldn ' t. create a functional lot. You ' d, have a _useless portion and also the_. right-of-way does cut right through it there . ' So it would really _be a meani n,gl es_s_ exercise for the sake of .getting additional.._. acreage , square footage . One thing I know the board is concerned about is precedence whenyouu _create a lot this size . The far.ms. to the east and ihe. west have not been divided up yet . I don ' t think you would be creating a precedent there because they don' t have a hardship . There is enough. acreage to create enough Lots there of sufficient size - and. length . .. This just happens to be a remanent of a very old division way .before the time they required this amount of width and area . MR. CHAIRMAN : Do you offer any suggestions concerning the right-of-way? MISS WICKHAM : That again was discussed y q-uite . extensive] with - the Planning Board . - What--the way the right-o,f=,w;ay ,wo.rk,s., from Sound Avenue up about halfway it is a common right-of-way with the . farm to the east, now owned by Mr . Simmons , and there .is an 8-" easement on-.each farm. t After that midway poin , the 'two right=of-,ways split off.. The_-_PI an.ni ng Board wanted to see 25 ' total width_ all the -way 'up. What we.`re doing now is discussing that with Mr. Simmons , Mr . Entenmann and Mr.. Harbes , who is buying the farmland here on Parcels -2 and 3 ' We ' ve asked Van Tuyl to go out before .we do amend the maps to show_ .exactly .where the trees and the roadway are on the ' Simmons' farm to the east . There is a house about halfway up and we ' re concerned that if ,the 'roadway is widened there towards the house they ' re goin.g to be.._impacting on the privacy of ,that house and also possibly ._re.qu_iri.n.g the cutting out of.: quite a few trees . So we..want the surveyor to show exactly wh.ere every- thing is located so that we can discuss 2-5 feet being- widened out to the west at that particular point, "and once that ' s. b_een resolved , the road would be 25 feet , as far as the right-of-way. I understand the Planning Board indicate that the improved wi o dth -wuld pro.b.ably again be 15 feet . - - - - . J . Southold. Town Board of Appeals -23- September 13 , 1984. Re.gul.ar Meeting (Appeal No . 3200 - ROBERT ENTENMANN , continued: ) MISS WICKHAM (continued) : Part of the right-of-way is within the subdivision and part of it is not. I think that they would have to look at it because it is partially outside the subdivision , and they are intending to make a determination on it . MR . CHAIRMAN : Well , we will have to correspondend with the Planning Board as to who intends to resolve the 280-a requirements . Normally , if the right-of-way is outside of the subdivision , i/t is within the purview of this board. MR . LESSARD: If you want me to say most of this is in the Planning ` Board' s jurisdiction , that ' s the way we will handle it . MR. CHAIRMAN : Just so there is no problem , it would mean that you would have to reapply to this board for 280-.A if it is not handled by the Planning, Board , and perhaps the Planning Board could do it as part of-the subdivision . Thank'.you . Is there anybody else in behalf of the applicant wishing to be heard? Anyone to speak i.n opposition to this application? Comments from the board members? (None ) Hearing no further comments , I ' ll make a motion closing the hearing and reserving decision pending, deliberations . MEMBER SAWICKI : Second . On motion by Mr . Goehringer , seconded by Mr . Sawicki , it was RESOLVED , that the hearing be - declared closed pending delibera- tions in the Matter of .ROBERT ENTENMANN under Appeal No . 3200 . Vote of the. Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Doyen , Grigonis , Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of all the members . Southold Town Board of Appeals -24- September 'i3, 1984 Regular Meeting DATE OF SPECIAL MEETING : On motion by Mr. Sawicki , seconded by Mr . Goehringer , it was RESOLVED., that A date of Thursday , September 20 , 1984 be tentatively scheduled for the next Special Meeting of this Board to be held at the Southold Town Hall , Main Road, Southold , New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Doyen , Grigonis , Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of all the members . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: On motion by Mr. Douglass , seconded by Mr. Goehringer , it was RESOLVED, that the Minutes of the following Meetings are hereby approved as submitted : Regular Meeting of August 23 , 1984 ; Sper .Al. Meeting of July 3 , 1984 . Vote of the Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Doyen , Grigonis , Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of all the members . The board discussed the abundance of files which are ready for public hearings due to actions by the other agencies , and the board members unanimously agreed that additional help is needed and that perhaps hiring an evening stenographer fo,r the verbatim minutes of the hearings would be the most helpful at this time . The Chairman would request an appointment with the Town Board for the next available meeting . DATE OF NEXT REGULAR MEETING: On motion by Mr . Douglass , seconded by Mr . Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, that the date , time and place of the next Regular Meeting of this board is scheduled for THURSDAY , OCTOBER 4 , 1984 commencing at 7 : 30 p .m. , Southold Town Hall , Main Road , Southold. Vote of the Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Doyen , Grigonis , Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution was unanimously adopted . Southold Town Board or Appeals -25- September 1984 Regular Meeting RESERVED DECISION : Appeal No . 3260 : Upon application of JOHN GIANNARIS AND OTHERS , by D. Kapell , 400 Front Street , Greenport , NY for a ariance to the Zoning Ordinance , Article XI , Section 100-112 (H ) for permission to use adjacent easterly premises of the Village of Greenport of . 765 acreage for parking acces- sory to the snack bar use existing on the parcel presently owned by the applicants also located at the north side of Main Road , East Marion ; . County Tax Map Parcel No . 1000-35-2-14 and No . 1000-35-2-15 . 1 ; see Site Plan revised 5/4/84 and 5/30/84(further amended 8/9/84 ) . __. The public hearing on this matter was held on July 26 , 1984 , at which time -the hearing was declared closed pending receipt of the lease agreement between the applicants and the Village of Greenport and receipt of the additional copies of the Amended Site- Plan for referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission . The Village lease was received September 10 , 1984 . The board deliberated September. 13 , 1984 and made the following findings and determination : This is an appeal from the June 15 , 1984 Notice of Disapproval from the building inspector for permission to build a parking lot on property leased from the Village of Greenport to the applicants herein executed .on the loth of May , 1984 . The leased premises consists of a parcel of land located at. the. north side of_.Main Road , abutting the "Hellenic Snack- Bar" premises on the west side a_nd , containing an area of . 765_ _acreage , and is located in the "A-Residential and Agricultural " Zoning District, fronting along the Main Road 120 ..81 feet. Article III , Section 100-112 (H ) of the Zoning Code and the relief granted hereunder requires continued maintenance of the required number- of spaces either through the existence of .such use to which these are acces-_. sory , or until such. spaces are provided elsewhere . The uses to which these parking spaces are accessory are shown on the Site Plan most recently revised 8/9/84 , prepared 'by Kontokosta Associates . Since the parkin_g_. lot to be leased by the applicants is not in the same ownership to the use to which it is accessory , it should be understood that in the event the lease is terminated , the applicant- must return to the Planning Board for a new Site Plan submission and reconsideration thereunder . Also , in considering this application , it is the recommendation of this board that the existing ingress located at the easterly end of the snack bar , along the north .side of .the Main Road , should be relocated further to the _east of the subject accessory parking 1_ot , and _that same should have a minimum width of 18 feet. This recommended relocation would be near the access area presently used by the Village and would extend through the Village parcel for _.parking ._. One of ,the, board ' s: concerns with the ingress p_roposed._ by applicant is customers walking from the parking area across the entrance route to the snack bar . Southold Town Board of Appeals -26- September 13 , 1. 984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3260 - JOHN GIANNARIS , ET AL . , continued: ) Vehicles entering at that point may not see persons walking directly into them from the accessory parking area . The board members are each familiar with the sites in question as well as the surrounding area . It is also noted for the record that the Planning Board has granted conditional approval at its September 10 , 1984 Meeting of the 8/9/84 Amended Site Plan , which has be.en made apart of this file . The Village of Gree_nport ten-year lease agreement has also been made part of this file . Now , therefore , , on motion by Mr . Goehringer , seconded by Mr . Sawicki , it was RESOLVED , that Appeal No . 3260 , in the matter of JOHN GIANNARIS , ET AL . for permission to build parking lot accessory to ,_the Hellenic Snack Bar ;. 'BE 'AND 'HER.EBY IS 'APPROVED SUBJECT TO .'THE FOLLOWING : ,_ 1 . Extension road or drive from rear of snack bar/restaurant be fenced along both sides with chainlink or split rail not to exceed four-feet in height (as a safety precaution ) ; 2 . A barrier be erected across the front of existing parking area at front .of snack bar/restaurant approximately three feet inside front property line to eliminate parking in front of existing snack bar (with or without proposed improvements to buildin.g ) and __more particular depicted on survey marked in red ink i._nitialed by the Chairman 9-13-84; 3 . The recommendation to eliminate existing ingress between snack bar and subject parking lot ;by moving the ingress further to the east of said parking lot ; 4 . That the words "NO PARKING" be painted in the gutter area along the street pavement at the egress and ingress areas . Location of Property : North Side of Main Road , East Marion , NY; County Tax Map Parcels No... 1000-35-2-14 anal No . 1000-3.5-2.15 : 1 . Vote of ,the Board. Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Doyen , Grigonis , Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution was adopted by unanimous _vote' of all the members . Southold Town Board of Appeals -27- September 13 , 19.84 Regular Meeting RESERVED DECISION : Appeal No. 3262 : Upon application of .J :Pe HUBERMAN , 2 Linda Lane , Setauket, NY (by I . Price , Jr. , Esq . ) for a Variance to the Zoning .Ordinance , Article III , Section 100-30 (C) for permission to establish home occupancy , to wit : , physician office , within a one-family residential building exceeding 30% of the maximum-permitted first floor area , at 41505 C. R. 48 , Southold , NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-059-03-023 . The public hearing on this matter was held .earlier this evening , at which time the hearing was declared closed pending. deliberations . The board made the following findings and determination : This is an appeal from the June 20 , 1984 Notice of Disapproval from the building inspector concerning an application to construct a new , one-family dwelling with phyisician ' s office on the entire first floor of 2 ,300 sq : ft. in area . The premises in question is located in the "A-Residential and Agricultural Zoning . District at the north side of County Road 48 , Southold.., is vacant and contains an area of approximately 42 , 900 sq . ft. with 132 . 17 ' frontage along the County Road . The subject parcel is bounded on all sides by residentially- agriculturally zoned properties . Approximately 200 feet to the. west of this parcel is a parcel of land _zoned "B-1.. Genera1 Business" ; and further west of Kenney ' s .Road _are premises zoned "B-_Light Business . " Article III , Section 100-30 ( C) E1 ] (c) of the Zoning Code provides that a home occupation shall not exceed 30% of the area of one floor of the main building , and the home occupation shall be incidental to the residential use of the premises and shall be carried on in the main building by the resident therein with not more than one nonresident assistant . Article III , Section 1.00-112 (A) requires a minimum of five parking spaces per each physician. Thirty percent of the greater floor area , (first floor) is 690 sq . ft. , the maximum permitted by the zoning ordinance without Board of Appeals approval . Applicant is requesting 2 ,300 sq . ft . , the entire first floor of this proposed one-family residence structure , which is substantially more than 100% of a variance of these regulations . Applicant has assured the bo._ard that this structure will be used at least 50% of the time as a resi - . de.nce by himself, and .that the structure will not be occupied or leased 'to others for residential purposes . _Applicant has also indicated that the design of this dwelling may be changed. It should be understood that a change in the square footage or percentage of use of the home occupation and residence should be resubmitted for reconsideration if the home occupancy is more-. than that permitted of that one floor allowed by this decision , or 1500 sq . ft . , whichever is less . The board members are familiar with the site in question as Southold Town Board o1. ..ppeals -28- September 1984 Regular Meeting (Appeal No . 3262 - J . P . HUBERMAN , continued : ) well as the surrounding neighborhood. Also , the board members have taken into consideration the testimony a_nd documentation both in, support and in opposition to this application . For the record , it is noted that a 28-name petition has been submitted in opposition to the application ., Although this parcel is vacant . and the difficulties or hardship claimed. by the applicant are self-imposed and "significant economic injury" has not been proven , the board does agree that 690 sq . ft . of area , 30% of this first floor area , is minimal . The board also agrees that some relief should be granted , that relief would not produce a change on the character of the immediate neighborhood since there are businesses ne.arby , . that the principal use of this structure is one-family residence , with this home' occupation as an accessory use , and therefore the public health , safety and welfare will be served by allowing certain relief, as noted below. Accordingly , on motion by Mr . Douglass , seconded by Mr . Doyen , it. was RESOLVED , that Appeal No . 3262 , in the matter for J . P . 'HUBERMAN , BE 'AND 'HEREBY IS -GRANTED , SUBJECT TO THE -FOLLOWING-CONDITIONS : 1 . That the home occupation use shall not exceed 65 . 2% of the first floor area (in no event more than 65 . 2% of the requested 2 ,300 sq . ft . , or 1 ,500 sq . ft . maximum) ; unless further authorized by this board ; 2 . That the home occupatio.n is limited to one practitioner (and his assistant ) ; , 3 . That the principal building must be practitioner ' s residence (no rental or occupancy for residence by others ); 4 . No expansion of the home occupation use , or the principal building without the express written consent of the Zoning Board of Appeals after formal application . Location of Property : 41505 C. R. 48, Southold , NY; County Tax Map Parcel No . 1000-022-02-.01 . Vote of the Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Doyen , Grigonis Douglass and Doyen . ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATIONS : On motion 'by Mr. Goehringer, seconded y Mr . Sawic i , it was RESOLVED, to declare Negative Environmental Declarations on each of the following as noted therein in accordance with the rules and _requirements of the N .Y . S . Environmental Quality -Review A•ct and Ch . 44 of the Town Code : Southold Town Board of Appeals -29- SepteniuCr 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3280 PROJECT NAME: ROBERT DeTREY This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article a of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated . below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: [X) Type II [ J Unlisted [ ) DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Variance for insuff. sideyard setback. LOCATION OF PROJECT: Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: 62825 C . R. 48 , Greenport , NY ; County Tax Map No . 1000-40-1-10 ,11 . . REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should this project be imple- mented as planned; �2) The relief requested is a setback or lot line variance, which does not require further processing, under "Type II" Actions of the State Environ- mental uality Review Act. g3) Construction proposed is located more than 75 feet from the mean high water mark and environmentally sensitive area(s) . • i Southold Town Boarca f Appeals -30- September 1984 Regular Meeting (Environmental Declarations , continued : ) S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3285 PROJECT NAME: JOHN 'AND MARILYN FLYNN This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or ' similar.: project. TYPE. OF ACTION: . [XI. Type II [ ], Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION:. Frontyard - accessory building ;- LOCATION. OF PROJECT:. . Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: 2250 Little Peconi6- Bay, Boulev_ard , Cutchogue; REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no. significant adverse effects to the environment are likely. to occur should this project be imple- mented as planned; rt2)— Relief -requested is no-t- di e-d to new co.nstru-cti-on -- (3) Relief requested is a setback variance, which does not require further processing under "Type II" Action of the State Environmental Quality Review Act . . Southold Town Board of Hppeals -31 - September 1 ,, , 1984 Regular Meeting (Environmental _Ddcl'arati'ons, 'continued: ). S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3290 PROJECT NAME: GENERAL WAYNE INN This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be' considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same .or similar. project. TYPE OF ACTION: [ ] Type II [ )] Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION:. Off' prem: sign LOCATION OF PROJECT:. . Town_ of Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: Cr. of 48 & Akerley Pond Lane , Southold., NY County Tax Map #1000-69-2-3 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no- significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should this project be imple- mented as planned; -_ (21) _Relief.elief requested is nct_.-di rechl y related to new construction. (3) The property in question is not located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands or other critical environmental area. Southold Town Board or Appeals -32- September- l ;, , 198,4 Regular Meeting (Environment6l­Decl*arations, 'continued.: ) 'S.E.Q.R.A'. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3233 PROJECT NAME: McKAY & GREENLY This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar. project. TYPE OF ACTION: [; -] Type II Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Area/width. LOCATION OF PROJECT:. Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: Main St. , New Suffolk, NY County Tax Map #1000-117-9-1.6 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects. to the environment are likely to occur should this project be imple= mented as planned;. .-(-2 - The property in question-is n he-9ted within 300 feet--.of tidal wetlands or other critical environmental area. (3) Relief requested is not directly related to new construction. Southold Town Board or Nppeals -33- September 1 ,, , 1984 Regular Meeting (Envi ronme►ital' 'Decl arati bns, continued: ) S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3251 PROJECT NAME: RENATE RIEDEL This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4. of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or .simildr.. project. TYPE. OF ACTION: [ X] Type II [ ]. Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: New dwelling w/insuff. setback LOCATION OF PROJECT:. Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: 675 Meadow Lane, Mattituck County Tax Map //1000-115-5-7 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur .should this project be imple- mente as pplanned; -- r.---.Kpproval has been obtain-ad froli the N.Y.S. Department o_f Environmental _ Conservation and/or the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. (3) The relief requested is a setback or. lot line variance , which does not require further processing under "Type II" Actions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Southold Town Board or Hppeals -34- September 1 , , 1984 Regular Meeting (EnvirOnm2nt6l' 'Decl'arati'ons, 'continued.: ) S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3282 PROJECT NAME: WINDSWAY BLDG. CORP. This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be, considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar.: project. TYPE OF ACTION: [X] Type II [ ]. Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Insu:ff.- rearyard setback LOCATION OF PROJECT:. Town of .Southold, .Couhty of Suffolk, more particularly known as: off North .Bayview .Rd. , Southold, NY County Tax Map #1000-77-3-25 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur .should this project be imple- mented as planned; The property in question-is meted- within 300 feet---of tidal wetlands or other critical environmental area. (3) The relief requested is a setback or lot line -variance , which does not require further processing under "Type II" Actions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Southold Town Board or Hppeals -35- September 1 ,, , 1984 Regular Meeting (Environmental 'Decl'arati'ons, 'continued: ) S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3289 PROJECT NAME: JAMES F. PRESTON This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or simildr.: project. TYPE OF ACTION: [ ' ] Type II. [ A. Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: , Lot area/width. LOCATION OF PROJECT:. Town of .Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: 1190 Hyatt Rd. , Southold, NY: County Tax Map #1000-50-1—p/0 18.3 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur. .should this project be imple- mented as planned; ( } Separating the project, in -gtxesti6n-f'r-om the waterfront--or environmental area is a 50—foot traveled roadway. (3) Relief requested is not directly related to new construction. . Southold Town Board or Hppeals -36- September 1 . , 1984 Regul.ar Meeting (Environmental' 'Ddcl'arati-ons, continued: ) S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3288 PROJECT NAME: JOHN WICKUAM ----- This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be, considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar.: project. TYPE OF ACTION: [ ] Type II [X]. Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Relief from Conditions 7 & 8, Appeal #3222. LOCATION OF PROJECT: Town of .Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: Main Rd. , GreenpQrt, NY County Tax Map #1000-52-5-58 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no. sigriificant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur .should this project be imple- mented as planned; (-2)- --The property in question--i ucate-d- within 300 feet---of tidal wetlands or other critical environmental area. (3) Relief requested is not directly related to new. construction. -Southold Town Board Of Appeals -37- September 1984 Regular Meeting (Environmental Declarations , continued: ) NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination o•f Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3287 PROJECT NAME: ALFRED 'N : 'AND. BARBARA 'Di'NUNZIO This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article B of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated - below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar. project. TYPE OF ACTION: [: ] Type II [XI Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: LOCATION OF PROJECT: Town of Southold, County. of Suffolk, more particularly known as: Right-of-.Way .off .South Side of Wells Road , Peconic , NY ; 1000-75-671 . REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should this project be imple- mented as planned; (2) - The relief requested is for---a-p-p-r-wal--of access over a -94-± foot right-of-way , .:which is not directly related to new construction . (3 ) Approval for construction has been received from the N . Y . S.. Dept. of Environmental Conservation , for which SEQRA compliance was made . Southold Town Board o , mppeals -38- September 1 ,, , . 1984 Regular Meeting (Environmental­Decl'ara.tions, 'continued: ) S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3250 PROJECT NAME: J.AMES RICKETTS This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be' considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar. project. TYPE. OF ACTION: [ ] Type II [X]. Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Two substandard lots. LOCATION OF PROJECT: Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: W/S Conklin Rd. (Grant Blvd. ) , Mattituck, NY County Tax Map #1000-139-3-19 & 30 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely. to occur should this project be imple- mented as planned; -.(-2-y --Separating the project in- cluest.40.n from the waterfront or environmental area is a 50-foot traded roadway. (3) Relief requested is not directly related to new. construction. Southold Town Board 01- Appeals -39- September 1.984 Regular Meeting (Environmental"DecTarations, continued: ) S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3286 PROJECT NAME: JOSEPH GRASSO This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for .the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar.: project. TYPE. OF ACTION: (K, ] Type II [ ]. Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: ND/front- yard. LOCATION OF 'PROJECT:. Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more :. particularly 'known as: NIS Soundview Ave. , Southold, NY County Tax Map #1000-59-6-3 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short, form has been submitted. which indicates that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should this project be imple- mented as planned; - �a) ---..The relief requested is-a- - or__lot line variance_,___ which does not require further processing under "Type II" Actions of the State Environm:en.tal Quality Review Act. - Southold Town Board o , tippeals -40- September 1 .. , 1984 Regular Meeting (Env ironniental' 'DOCTa'eations, continued.: ) S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3284 PROJECT NAME: RICHARD W. SLEDJESKI This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N:Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be' considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar. project. TYPE OF ACTION: [' ] Type II [X ]. Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: 6' high fence.. LOCATION OF PROJECT: Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: Cr of 48 &. Moores Lane , Greenport, NY County Tax Map #1000-40-2-21 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no- significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur ,should this project be imple- mented as planned; --(-2.) --_--The -property in question---is­nez Leered within 300 feet----of tidal wetlands or other critical environmental area. Southold Town Board of hppeals -41 - September 1 . , 1984 Regular Meeting (EnvironmOht61' 'Decl6r6tions, continued: ) S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3283 PROJECT NAME: BERNARD R. DEMPSEY This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar. project. TYPE. OF ACTION: [x ] Type II [ ]. Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: pool in sideyard/insufficient coverage. LOCATION OF PROJECT:. Town of .Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: 5705 Stillwater Ave._, Cutchogue , NY... County Tax Map //1000-137-4-4 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates .that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur. .should this project be imple- mented as planned; . -- --Separating the project in ques tien-f7re�m the waterfront- --or environmental area is a bulkhead or concrete barrier in„good condition. (3) The relief requested is a setback or lot line. variance, which does not require further processing under "Type II" Actions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Southold Town Board o , nppeals -42- September l - , 1984 Regular Meeting (Environmental" "Declarations, continued: ) S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3281 PROJECT NAME: EDWARD L. EERRMANN ----- This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be, considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar.: project. TYPE OF ACTION: DU Type II [ ] Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Insuff. sideyard setback-. LOCATION OF PROJECT: Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: W.S Marlene Dr. , Matti.tuck,_ NY County Tax Map #1000-144-2-40 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should this project be imple- mented as planned; . ---(-2- -�) - he r-elief� requested is _a setback or lot 'line variance_,_---which does not require further processing -under "Type II" Actions of the State Environmental Quality Revvew Act. Southold Town Board o7 mppeals -43- September 1 . , 1984 Regular Meeting (Environmental' 'Decl'arati'ons, 'continued: ) S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3277 PROJECT NAME: MARIE PATTERSON This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar.: project. TYPE OF ACTION: [' ] Type II ( A. Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Variance for division/lots insuff area. LOCATION OF PROJECT:. . Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: Great Peconic Bay_..Blvd. , Laurel, NY County Tax Map //1000-128-2-17 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no- significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur. ,should this project be imple- mented as planned; ---{- ----Separa-ting- the project in gues -ien i om the waterfront:_or environmental area is a bulkhead or concrete barrier in good condition. (3) The premises in question is at an elevation of 10 or more feet above mean sea level. • V Southold Town Board o , ,ppeals -44- September 1 ,, , 1984 Regular Meeting (Environmental 'Decl'arations, continued: ). S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3266 PROJECT NAME: ANTONE & JEAN MILESKA This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be' considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar.- project. TYPE OF ACTION: [ 'A Type II [X]. Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Insuff. --area & width of -lots. LOCATION OF PROJECT:. Town of Southold,. County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: Marratooka Lane, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map #1000-115-4-9 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no- significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur .should this project be imple- mented as planned; - --The -premises in question--is—atar -L-1-evation of 10 or more feet above mean sea level. (3) Separating the project in question from the waterfront or environmental area is a 50-foot traveled roadway. - Southold Town Board oT hppeals -45- September 1 ,, ; 1984 Regular Meeting (EnvironmentaT 'Decl'arations, continued: ) S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 325? ' PROJECT NAME: ALDER STOLLMEYER This notice is issued pursuant to- Part. 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of. the Town of .Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this. declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar.: project. TYPE. OF ACTION: [ ] Type II [X]. Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Insuff -area - lot set=off. LOCATION OF PROJECT:_ Town of Southold, County of Suffolk; more : particularly known as: North Sea. Dr. , Southold, NY . County Tax Map #1000-54-5-45.8 & 45=9 REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which .indicates' that no significant '.adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur. .should this project be imple- mented as planned;. (2-- The- premises; in question -is- at an el€rva-tion of 10 or more---feet above mean. sea level. (3) Relief requested is not directly related to new construction. °7 Souihold Town Board o , nppeals -46- September 1 ., , 1984 Regular Meeting (Environmehtal' 'Decl'arations, 'continued: ). S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3230 PROJECT NAME: JEAN C. HOLLAND --- . This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or simildr.: project. TYPE OF ACTION: [ ] Type II ]. Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Re-divide 2 lots / area / width LOCATION OF PROJECT:. Town of .Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: Vanston Rd. , Nassau- Point, _Cutchogue , NY County Tax Map Parcel #1000-111-10-18 & 1 REASONS) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should this project be imple- mented as planned; - -(2- __Approval has been obtained from the N .Y.S" Department of Environmental Conservation and/or the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. (3) Relief requested is not directly related to new construction. Southold Town Board of Appeals -.47-' Septembert13 , 1984 Special Meeting:. l . i NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance APPEAL NO. : 3273 PROJECT NAME: ACADEMY PRINTING SERVICES This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y. S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law 044-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a sign.ifi-. cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated : below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: [X) 'Type II [ ) Unlisted [ ) DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Variance for subdivision of property. LOCATION OF PROJECT: Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: Horton '; s . Lane , Southold , NY; County Tax Map No . 1000-62-1-2 . REASON (S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should this project be imple- mented as planned; (2) The property in question is not located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands or other critical environmental area. Vote of the. Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Grigonis , Doyen , Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution was unanimously adopted by 611 the members . s s Southold Town. Board of .Appeals -48- September 13 , 1984 Regular Meeting ( Environmental Declarations , continued.: ) . Vote of .the. Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Doyen , Grigonis , Douglass and Sawi.cki . This resolution- was adopted by unanimous vote of all the members . Each of .the following matters were reviewed and noted incomplete or held in abeyance pending documentation as noted: Appeal No . 32.15 - Helen and William Coster . Await amended plans . Appea-1 No. 3035 - C . Georgiopoulos , await further instructi-ons from appl i cant ' s. attorney_. Appeal- No. ' 32T6 - Eugene---Davison . Await amended plan and P. B . Appea-1 No . ' 32-74 - Best , Schmitt , Syverson . Await -P . B. , D.=E . C . and Co. Health approvals or comments . Appeal No . 3205 - John- DiVello . Await R-O-W. relocation agreement . Appeal No . ' 3183 . - -Mary N. Code - Await •app-1 i cati on to P . B . for - comments and review. Appeal No . 3214 - Hanuaer and Bagley. Await Health Dept . Art . 6 . Appeal- No . 31-96 - Walter Hairston-: --Await application -to P . B .-- -for review and comments . Appeal No . 3191 - Herbert Mandel . Await further instructions . Appea-1 No . 3249 Donald Brickley. Await D. E . C . _. & Co . Health Art . 6 . Appeal No . 3252 - John- Charles and M. Sledjeski . Await D . E. C. response and Co .. H-ealth Art... 6 . Appeal No . 3033 - B.-- Crystal . Await requested survey plan . Julia- K.- Tuthill by Irv-ing L . Price , Esq . File incomp-lete . (No # ) Appeal No . ' 3268 - Julia K. Tuthill . Await -D. E . C . res-p-onse . Being.'there was:.;rio-_other business properly coming before the board at .this _time , motion was made by Mr . Goehringer , .seconded by Mr . Sawicki , and unanimously carried ,__ to _adjourn . ... The meeting ad-journed at 10 : 35 p. m. Respectfully submitted , — - Li da F. Kowalski , Secretary 'Gerard P . oehr�inger ,/Chairman Southo.l d Town,._B.o,aFr.d`:of :Appe_dI s. _November 15 , 1984. -� proved RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE SOUi HOLD TOWN CLERK ,Town Clerk, Town of Southo d