Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-11/10/2003 1a4- PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SsafIF co BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� G P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 co y Southold,New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO v, • Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS O KENNETH L.EDWARDS Fax(631) 765-3136 'jijJ Q`' MARTIN H.SIDOR �.( `t►a PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MINUTES November 10, 2003 6:00 p.m. Present were: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Richard Caggiano, Member William J. Cremers, Member Kenneth L. Edwards, Member Martin H. Sidor, Member Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Carol Kalin, Secretary SETTING OF THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING Chairman Orlowski: Good evening. I'd like to call this meeting to order. The first order of business is for the Board to set Monday, December 8, 2003 at 6:00 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, as the time and place for the next regular Planning Board Meeting. Mr. Cremers: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Orlowski: 6:00 p.m. - Petrolino/Graseck - This proposal is to amend the lot line between SCTM#1000-78-8-16.2 (Parcel 1) and SCTM#1000-78-8-17.2 (Parcel 2) and transfer 0.255 acres of Parcel 1 to Parcel 2 where, after the transfer, Parcel 1 Southold Town Planninq Board Page Two November 10, 2003 would equal 0.918 acres and Parcel 2 would equal 1.063 acres. The properties are located on the n/s/o North Bayview Road, +/- 375' east of Cedar Avenue, and on the e/s/o Cedar Avenue, +/- 414' north of North Bayview Road, in Southold. Are there any questions or comments on this proposed amended lot line change? Thomas McCarthy: Good evening, Tom McCarthy, representing Mr. Petrolino. Unfortunately, Mr. Petrolino has asked me to request to rescind the application at this point. There has been a falling out between the agreement with himself and his neighbor. I believe you will be seeing this application again for a similar lot change - not with Mr. Graseck but with an adjoining neighbor. So, we regret to remove the application at this point but it will be subject of a new application in the near future. Chairman Orlowski: So, that will be a totally new application? Tom McCarthy: It will be for the same —yes, it will be a new application. It will be for the same area. In the rear, there will be a resultant of forty thousand square feet, as the Board has directed us on the Petrolino parcel, but it will not be going to the one immediate neighbor; it will be going to another immediate neighbor. Chairman Orlowski: O.K. So, there would be no sense keeping the hearing open or anyiiing like that? 7z McCarth : I don't believe so no. I think we will submit to ma new you s and a new Y N formal application. Chairman Orlowski: O.K. The hearing is open and I will entertain a motion to close the hearing since the applicant has rescinded the application. Mr. Cremers: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: 6:05 p.m. - Mattituck Self Storage - This site plan is for a new 7,500 sq. ft. 2nd floor addition with renovation of an existing 22,996 sq. ft. building and maintenance of a 14,184 sq. ft. metal storage building on a 1.697 acre parcel in the LI Zone located at approximately 151' south of Route 48 on the east side of Wickham Avenue, known as 885 Wickham Avenue, in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-140-2-9 l�(o Southold Town Planning Board Page Three November 10, 2003 I'll ask if there are any comments on this site plan application? Thomas McCarthy: Good evening again, Thomas McCarthy. Together with my wife, Susan, we are the applicants. I'd just like to put up some photos, if I may, in a spot that is convenient for everyone to see them. We would like to submit to the Board a covering letter, as well as, a booklet Self-storage Standards and the Modern Community. I would like to read directly from my prepared comments anyhow. So, Dear Members: Please let this letter serve as a synopsis for the handout which I gave you. This booklet is a result of a study commissioned by the Self Storage Association and conducted by Economic Consulting Associates of Tempee, Arizona.7he purpose of the study, and to acknowledge some of the folks that are here this evening, may have some issues regarding traffic and I would just like to give you some industry data regarding traffic. The purpose of the study was to accurately measure how much traffic is generated by self-storage facilities. The study contains data from all across the nation and focused on 158 facilities. The detail in the study, if you flip through your pages and look at the highlighted information, is as follows: the average facility size through those 158 facilities was 59,481 square feet. Our proposed facility is 30,000 square feet— approximately half. The average number of storage units is 553 -we have 235. Again, less than half. The important figure here is the average vehicle trips per 100 spaces is 6.82. That is on a daily basis. For every 100 spaces, there are 6.82 vehicle trips per day nationally and in the Northeast Region is 6.44. So, roughly, six and a half trips per day per 100 spaces. If you equate that 'the number of spaces that we have, there will be 15 trips per day for our facility. That is what the numbers show based on my own observation of local facilities and other folks that I know in the business. I believe it will be less than that. This number of cars is a little bit less than probably what you would see in a fifteen-minute period at Handy Pantry in the morning. And that would be for the entire day for the facility. In addition to the national study, I submitted a letter earlier today to your Planning Office from a Self Storage Facility Manager that has worked for the last five years in the industry in Bridgehampton and in East Hampton, as a Manager of Dispatch Self Storage in Bridgehampton and Uncle Bob's Self Storage in East Hampton. Her experience shows, because of the seasonality of our area, she would only see a half dozen cars come in though her facilities on a typical day. So, I urge you to waive these—the Planning Board to consider the merits of our application, other possible uses for the site, and the vast improvements that this beautiful new facility and facade will contribute to our community. I respectfully request that the public hearing be closed tonight and the matter be put to a vote this evening and I appreciate your consideration in this matter. A few other points that I would like to make, aside from my prepared written comments, the fact that we are paying just over thirteen thousand dollars a year in taxes on this building. It is a hefty sum to carry. We are looking for a good use that is going to be a good neighbor and we are looking to be a good neighbor to the people in Mattituck. We would have been entitled to go for a reduction in our taxes on the building because the front building has been vacant. We have not done that. We have kind of sucked it up Southold Town Planning Board Page Four November 10, 2003 and paid our share of the taxes over in Mattituck. We feel that what we have is a creative, adaptive re-use of an existing old industrial building. The neighborhood has a mix of residential uses as well as business uses, however, it is all zoned for business with the residential office zoning, hamlet business zoning, as well as, light industrial. That about concludes my presentation. I would be happy to answer any questions that anyone may have. Richard Caggiano: On the traffic- you said it was roughly fifteen cars per day? Tom.McCarthy: Correct. Richard Caggiano: Is it different on the weekends as opposed to weekdays? Tom McCarthy: Yes, there is a little bit more traffic on a Saturday and the trend across the country, Rich, is that some facilities have even been starting to close up on Sunday because they don't see that there is as much traffic generated on Sunday. Southold Self Storage - I called there several times today. I got a national answering service. There was no one manning the facility. There is not a lot of business there. They are about eighty, eighty-five percent full. If you go past there on any given day, if you see three cars in the parking lot, it is quite a bit. They have about 70,000 square feet of storage space. Mr. Caggiano: Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: O.K. No other questions. Are there any other comments or questions? Michael Herbert: Hi. My name is Michael Herbert. I did send a letter to Mr. Orlowski regarding my concern. I have lived in the area now since 1986 and I work in the area so I am very familiar with the element of the traffic, the activity that is going on and, in my letter, I would just like to reiterate that Wickham Avenue is used as a main artery between Route 48 and Route 25 and has been. You know, that and Love Lane are the shortest routes between the two main highways and, with that, I have witnessed myself countless accidents both on Route 48 and Route 25. We have the firehouse at the corner of Pike Street and Wickham Avenue; we have the daycare school on Wickham Avenue. We have the high school on Pike Street and I am constantly seeing children walking across Wickham Avenue to Love Lane during the seasonal months. Love Lane is bustling with traffic literally so - and I - because I work right there in the area and I am cognizant of the whole area as far as traffic and mobility and I can imagine tractor trailers now being introduced to the area, you know, the constant flow of that type of traffic any more than what we already have with the way the North Fork is developing and Mattituck and Love Lane and the festivals and the what have you. I just think it would absolutely really have serious consequences to our area. That's really my main concern is the level of traffic. I spoke to Tom and I told him that if, for instance, a sofa bed manufacturing company opened up there, I would be more in favor if there were fifty employees and fifty employees went there and stationarily parked their cars and went to work and then went, you know - and left- if it were more stationary but with the Southold Town Planning Board Page Five November 10, 2003 constant flow of traffic and commercial vehicles and trucks and Rider trucks and so on. I mean, I think that would be a grave mistake on Wickham Avenue. It is a short street; it is already very, very busy. You have the railroad tracks there on top of it; it is a main artery. If you check with Southold Town Police and see how many accidents time and time and time again on Route 25 that there are and, even if they were to put a traffic light there, eventually then it would only create that much more congestion anyway and that necessarily would not be the answer to solve the problem of a storage facility coming in there. Personally, I would rather see something that is more stable with a work force where there is not constant in and out of vehicles and especially commercial vehicles - tractor trailers, Rider trucks, things of that nature. That's my - and I have lived in that particular area now for twenty years and I, personally, for the sake of the business district and the way they have been revitalizing Love Lane, I think it would be important to preserve what we have there because once it is compromised, you know, -then it will just become a Mecca of congestion and problems. Thank you for my time. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? George Lomaga: Hi. I recognize people here. A lot of people I know. Hi. I am George Lomaga. I am speaking for mom. She lives on the corner. It is a blacked out corner right there on 48 and Wickham Avenue. She has cars almost come into her yard. It is a wonder some have not come into her yard with that traffic light there. Today was interesting. I went over to visit her and I grew up on that corner right next to K. G. Brown's. I can remember a car accident where a train came through and took a car out 1. right at the crossing when the gates were down and, what was interesting today is, the gates came down -they were working in town on the train - and the traffic was backed up down to the fire house. Traffic was backed up to almost the traffic light in front of my mom's yard because the gates were down. There was a cop in line; people were making a u-turn, coming around and going back out the other way and, watching in mom's yard out the kitchen window, I said God, if they put a storage facility here whether it is six cars, seven cars -the gentleman that spoke before - the trucks. The concern I have is - definitely is - you are going to have a major, major catastrophe there with a train and cars. She can hardly get out sometimes in the summertime with the traffic. When K.G. Brown used to have the ice machines there, the ice machine was out front and people would stop and pick up the ice and, I agree with the gentleman, it would be a heck of a lot better to have people come early in the morning and go to work as K.G. Brown had and then, you know, five o'clock they would be leaving - going away. But here, now you are going to have a flow- congestion in the summertime on top of that. I just don't- I mean, if you guys could foresee what the future is going to be there, it is great. I don't know how you could make plans but certainly it looks like it is a dangerous, dangerous situation no matter what you are going to do there in that corner if you are going to have a storage facility. All you can do is maybe just come down there and see once in a while. You guys know what—well, Marty knows - don't you, Marty? You know what it is like there where the print shop was. So, it is — so, I think you've got a headache there if you put a storage facility there guys and m'ame, too. O.K. So, you need to look at that a little seriously, I think, on the flow of traffic and what it is going to / 9q Southold Town Planning Board Page Six November 10, 2003 do. My question is what is going to happen if it gets backed up to 48 if you are going to have cars when the gates come down? You need to think of that. O.K.? Chairman Orlowski: O.K. Thank you. Any other comments? Debra Granberq: Hi. My name is Debbie Granberg. I live at 735 Wickham Avenue, just on the north side of the proposed self-storage. I have a couple of questions first that maybe Mr. McCarthy, at some point, could answer for me. I would like to know what the hours of his operation would be and he says he is going to have - I don't know - two hundred and some odd units. But, I believe the total that you are going to renovate is 44,670 square feet? 7,500 up, 22 down and 14 in the back? Someone? Chairman Orlowski: Who can answer that question? Do you want to answer that question? Bruno Semon: Tom, the fourteen is your pre-existing space which you will have to indicate. Tom McCarthy: The 14,000 square foot building in the rear is not being touched. The building, as you see it right there, enjoys a foot print of 16,500 square feet so a portion of that on the south side towards your home is going to be - a lower level - be r;riovated, re-done, with a new second floor above it. O.K.? Debbie Granberq: So the two buildings in the back will be destroyed or just nothing will be there? Tom McCarthy: No. The building in the rear will remain and the building in the front that you see with the new building will have the same exact footprint of the existing building. Debbie Granbera: I understand but, the two that are in the rear, are they going to be used for storage - eventually? Tom McCarthy: There is one building in the rear, m'ame. Debbie Granbera: O.K. The one building in the rear- will that be used for storage? Tom McCarthy: It presently has storage in it now, yes. Debbie Granberq: O.K. So, that will be - Tom McCarthy: So, the existing building footprint will not change for the main building. The subject of this application is the front building and that footprint will not change. Debbie Granberq: Well, a concern that I have is commercial traffic, of course. On November 5 , I was driving from the North Road to go home and I had to stop on Wickham Avenue because there was a huge eighteen wheeler tractor trailer making his move to go back into the back storage - and this was a huge tractor trailer right there - I 1�ov Southold Town Planning Board Page Seven November 10, 2003 had to stop and I am thinking, well, gee - if he is now having this, what else is going to come? How many Rider trucks - anything commercial like this. I mean, in this area it is a hazard. 48 and Wickham Avenue - that has been told before - is constantly with accidents. I was in an accident there in July- totaled my car- someone hit me. I also went to Southold Storage today and I did speak to a gentleman there that is actually from the main office in Ohio and I asked him a few questions about his storage facility. They have 59,700 square feet- not 70,000. They have 585 units -two are for commercial use but, it is on six to seven acres he said. This would be on 1.69 and you could just drive by this Southold unit here and Wickham and see the difference in the traffic. That is another concern. Also, I made a couple copies - I did not realize there would be so many of you up there - The Eighth Annual Self-Storage Almanac. This is an information and analysis for a new century of self storage with the people that are buying units - self storage. They would want this. It is like their kind of Bible, per se, and the number of vehicles entering the facility daily, for a rental square footage of 25- 49,000 is 20.6 cars. I mean, this is - I have it here. I'mean, you know, I would be happy to hand out- I only have four that I can hand out to you. And another concern that I have because cars, I would assume since there is not much parking space there, would be on the side where my house is. There is no kind of- I had spoken to Mr. McCarthy on November 3Id and he said there is a fence there already but, in the evening, what happens if people are going to be using the storage facility? You back into the place to unload or load so lights will be shiyfng and what about security lights -what kind of problem is that going to be? These are things that I find important but I guess the main thing is the traffic which, I think, 4s going to be a big problem after just seeing the other day that tractor trailer stopping on Wickham to back into the facility. I mean, in the summertime I can't imagine what that is going to do to this place. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: What are the hours of operation? Tom McCarthv: They have not been established yet but we would be happy to limit them to what is good for the community. Chairman Orlowski: OK. Any other comments? Jeff Strong: I am Jeff Strong. I am a business owner in Mattituck. I also own a home that I rent out on the corner of Wickham Avenue and 48. My understanding is that this property is zoned industrial - is that correct? Chairman Orlowski: Yes. Jeff Strong: You know, for me, I balance my assessment between being a homeowner, an owner of a house I rent, as well as a business owner and, I think the fact that the property is zoned industrial, it would seem to me that this could have a lot more potential for heavy use than what is suggested here all be it, you know, I think that some of the other neighbors have good concerns that would seem to me to be able to be reasonably remedied with some type of conversation between yourselves and the applicant. The only question that I had had - and I had asked Tom this question - with Southold Town Planning Board Page Eight November 10, 2003 the whole affordable housing issue and the press for apartments and that type of thing, I asked Tom the question if apartments were allowed on industrial property. His answer to me was no. Is that, in fact, currently accurate? Chairman Orlowski: Yes, it is. Jeff Strong: I don't want to throw a monkey wrench into the application or anything like that but I did want to voice my viewpoint that, with the press of the need for affordable housing and with the direction that it seems the Town has stated that they want to go is to make more affordable housing available in the hamlet districts, it would seem to me that this might be a very good way of possibly reaching some type of way that might be good for the applicant as well as sensitive to some of the neighbors in the area that possibly the second story- I don't know the ins and outs of what it takes to make affordable housing be available on that issue - but you might be able to have self- storage on the bottom, apartments on the top which would ease some of the concerns that some of the neighbors have about the intensity of traffic and also address some of the affordable housing issues. Those are my comments. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? John Nickles, Jr.: Good evening, John Nickles Jr. of Southold. I can understand the concerns that people would have about traffic in that area. It is a p ce that does receive a lot of traffic. There is the Mattituck Sanitation. They have' trucks going in and out of there all the time, but it is one of those places where traffi7is expected to be. It is a road that I use all the time when I go back and forth between Mattituck and Southold. I take Route 48 up, I turn left at the light there and that's how I get to the Main Road. So, there certainly is a significant amount of traffic there and that is a concern. But, it is business property and this is business property which, I presume, was figured out that is where is should be from past Master Plans, studies and, considering that this is industrial property, there could be numerous other types of more intense businesses there than the one being proposed today, I believe. I would ask you to look favorably upon this application. Thank You. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? Anthony Uruso(sp.?): Good evening. My name is Anthony Uruso and I would like to speak in favor of the application. I spent ten years on a Planning Board for the Town of Smithtown, most of those ten years as Chairman and, when an application of this sort came before us, it was very refreshing and very nice to see an intensity use blend in more favorably with the community. Here is an opportunity to take a light industrial site that could have a lot of could bes to it that would be more intensive to the use that Mr. McCarthy and his wife are planning here. A self storage unit is a non-nuisance use. It is probably the lowest intensity use for traffic in a commercial site that I can think of in my term. So, I wholeheartedly support it and hope this Board would see to favor that as well. Thank you very much. Chairman Orlowski: O.K. Any other comments? a0� Southold Town Planning Board Page Nine November 10, 2003 James Dinizio: Jim Dinizio, Greenport. I, too, ask you to look favorably upon this application. In the course of my business - as security- I have done a couple of these self storage areas and I can tell you, working there during the day, that it is not a real busy and certainly not a noisy business. You know, it is mostly people just coming and putting their stuff away that maybe they have moved to a smaller house or, you know, something of that sort or they die and had to store their furniture. And, also, I think it would help the businesses in town because they could store their stuff there and maybe they would not have to add on to their buildings and, you know, maybe it is too small and I have seen a lot of that, too. And also for all the reasons stated - that the area was chosen for that. I mean, it was planned for that. You know, you're the Planning Board and that's part of the plan was that should be industrial and certainly this is probably I can't think of a less intensive industrial use more conducive to a neighbor than that. I understand people live there and certainly let's hope that this business will be a good neighbor. Knowing Tom as I do, I don't think that he would be a bad neighbor. He's always done everything top notch. I don't foresee this being any different so I hope that you would look favorably on this. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Thank you. Craig Arm: Hi, Craig Arm from Southold. I just wanted to mention to the neighbors that belong to Southold Self Storage and I know over the last year and a half that I have had some things stored, I don't think I have ever seen more than two other cars other than myself in there at any given time, that it is usually- it is almost a joke when you look at / all the parking requirements and everything they make everybody do and how few cars are ever actually in there at any time. I think it is a great re-use of the site and I think, aesthetically, it looks great and hopefully the Board will look favorably upon it. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Thank you. Debbie Granberg: Has anyone considered to do a traffic study of that area? Chairman Orlowski: No, at this - no traffic study on that. Debbie Granberg: You're not going to do any? Bruno Semon: We had it looked at by our Town Engineer. It was also certified for a use that is permitted within the zoning district itself. The zone was there; it was not created for it. The Superintendent of Highways felt it was no issue with additional use on Wickham Avenue and the main reason is because, as everybody stated, it is an artery. It is used heavily for commercial use, currently, at this time. Debbie Granberg: But the incidents of traffic accidents on 25 and more so on 48, that doesn't give anyone to say gee, you know what, there are a lot of problems with this street. Maybe we should reconsider this or something? Southold Town Planning Board Page Ten November 10, 2003 Bruno Semon: What we did as a Planning Board is, during the SEQRA review, we sent it to Suffolk County Department of Public Works, which basically runs 48. There were no comments given from the County to us. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? Brett McCarthv: Good evening, Brett McCarthy. I am from Southold. I am just here in support of this project. From what I hear tonight, a lot of the concerns are with the traffic issue and I think that would be a concern but the fact is that it is zoned as an industrial property and we are stating what has already been said this evening but, compared to what could be put at this site, fifteen cars is not a lot of additional traffic. The gentleman said before that it might be better to have, you know, if it was a different type of use and there were fifty employees there, they would be coming at nine o'clock and leaving at five o'clock which are the two most busiest times of the day. I think fifteen cars, which is the average of course, isn't, you know, worse than that because it is going to be spread out throughout the whole day. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? Bill Witske: Bill Witske from Southold. I am also here in favor of this - as an application, I am in favor of this. I am Assistant Fire Chief within the town here and traffic concerns ,-6're, I know all to well, what we have here in the town and the accidents that we do have. Some of the issues that were brought up, obviously, are legit. If this thing was still in existence as a manufacturing facility as it was, they would still be getting tractor trailers there from time to time. So whether or not we enjoy that particular facet of business, we do have these large trucks on the roads and we do have to work with them. If it is open approximately the same hours that the facility right over behind us are - probably eight to ten hours a day, two cars an hour, sixteen - twenty more cars a day, I don't think that is going to be a big factor on that particular road. I am sure that is something you are all going to look at and as I have known Tom for a good number of years and I have always been pleased with the work he does and I know he has always been a good neighbor and he always runs a top notch operation. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? Len Vaccariello: My name is Len Vaccariello. I own a small business in the area and I used to patronize the local mini storage over here. It was invaluable to me. We need things like that. Same story that I hear every week watching you guys on T.V. now- the little guy is losing his warehouse space all over the North Fork. We really need a place to store things. I think it is important. I think we need it. I apologize - the big truck was mine. Thank God we have only had trucks like that maybe three times in two years. Debbie Granberq: There was also a Mohawk there. Len Vaccariello: At the same time. Yes. It was a rareity but I apologize. Southold Town Planning Board Page Eleven November 10, 2003 Debbie Granberq: The last couple of days - there was a Mohawk and then that one. It was you. Len Vaccariello: It was me and I am sorry but it does not happen often and the people who patronize the mini storages are not going to be - as much as I know. Debbie Granberq: It looks like people that will use it back and forth. Chairman Orlowski: The Board will entertain all the questions - no debates. Len Vaccariello: I mean, as far as I am concerned, I think it is a worthwhile project. I think we need it. I think little homeowners need it and also little businesses need it. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? George Lomaga: Yeah, I just heard parking. Is the parking going to be across the street? There's no parking in the facility. Chairman Orlowski: George, I know you, but we have to have your name. George Lomaga: George Loma a. I am sorry. I just heard parking - is the parking going to be next to Ann's place? Chairman Orlowski: No, the parking will be on the site around the building. George Lomaga: Wait, I can't - that is just a roadway along the railroad tracks there, right? Chairman Orlowski: Yes, but there is enough parking there. George Lomaga: And then what about the front where the - is the front part - is there going to be parking in front, too? Chairman Orlowski: It is landscaped in front. I think there is some parking. Bruno Semon: There is parking. It is on the site plan outside the window. George Lomaga: And there is parking across the street as well? Chairman Orlowski: No. George Lomaga: So that is not part to be developed at all? Chairman Orlowski: No. Mr. Lomaga: So, it is just going to be the facility on the west side of the road? z Southold Town Planning Board Page Twelve November 10, 2003 Chairman Orlowski: Yes. Mr. Lomaga: O.K. And there is a requirement for the number of places for parking -for the number of storage places? Is that what I am hearing? Chairman Orlowski: Yes. George Lomaga: O.K. Thanks. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? Michael Herbert: I just want to reiterate that it has been made clear- even John Nichols stated that he uses Wickham Avenue as an artery between Route 48 and 25 and visa versa and that just proves the point that it is a main artery that is used by many people going that are looking to cross over. It is the shortest point between the two main roads and it is most commonly used as opposed to Love Lane and, therefore, I just ask for you to consider that and to really spend some time to really analyze how it will affect the area during seasonal months, how it will affect the area with mainly commercial traffic and pedestrian car traffic and, you know, in light of everything that is really going on there already. So, thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? Angelo Stepnoski: I own a small business in Southold. I think it is an appropriate use of that situation. I think it is a great improvement on the situation we have there now. As you can see what it looks like, it is going to be a good improvement. It is not going to be much of an impact on the neighborhood at all and I think they should let him have it. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? Tom Mc Carthv: Just as a follow up to some of the other comments - I have not taken a look at what Miss Granberg had submitted to you but, if it is from the Self Storage Almanac, I concur with whatever the figures are because they are both industry publications what I have given you and what she has given you and I am sure that is accurate. If we can do affordable apartments there, I would be happy to do it but, unfortunately, it is not in the Town Code. It would probably lead to just a little bit more traffic than what our facility would have because it would be at different hours. Thank you. William Cremers: Tom, one question - the tractor trailers - do you expect many of these? Tom McCarthy: We don't. We see a lot of people moving in with their own pick-ups. Occasionally, there will be some people moving into the area from other areas. There will be. I can't sit here and say that there will never be a tractor-trailer there but what we have done is we have maintained the loading dock in the front of the building where K. Southold Town Planning Board Page Thirteen November 10, 2003 G. used to take his goods in and out. We have maintained that. We have made that a covered entranceway with an air lock on the inside. There is plenty of room for a tractor- trailer to back in and stay out of the roadway and still allow for plenty of car and pick up truck maneuvering around the front of the building and the site. The parking that is in the front of the building - I believe you have six or eight spaces in the front of the building and it is a different facility than Southold Self Storage because it is going to be gated. Unless you have paid your bill, you are not getting in. You can park in the front but you will not be getting into the facility. So, there will not be people coming through and driving around and joy riding through our facility. It will only be for our paid customers whose invoices are up to date. William Cremers: Any thoughts about the hours of operation? I know someone brought it up. You said it is going to be gated. Are you going to have twenty-four hour coverage on the gate? Tom McCarthy: No. The gate will be locked down at a particular time that we decide but there will be a manager there full-time on staff all the time to answer anyone's questions, to rent new units and to take care of any issues on site so there will not be a twenty-four hour facility. There really isn't the need and demand at three o'clock in the morning I've got to get my sofa, you know. This is long-term storage. People put things in for six, eight, ten months. We are currently in the local telephone book now. We are receiving phone calls. I spoke with a gentleman by the name of Mr. Long today in Mattituck— hey, when are you going to be open? We need you. I said well, really, it depends on what goes on tonight and he said, well, I really hope it goes well for you. There could not be a better use for that site than what you are doing. It is a service to the community and we really need it. We are happy to work with the community as far as hours go and we don't see a need for people to be in there all hours of the night. Chairman Orlowski: O.K. Any other comments? Hearing none, any questions from the Board? O.K. No more comments from anyone or the Board, I will entertain a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Caggiano: So moved. Mr. Cremers: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. (The hearing was closed at 6:43 P.M.) Does the Board have any problems? You know, it is always tough - industrial property and you are looking at it and I think Mr. Uruso back there mentioned it. When you get a non-nuisance type industry in a residential area, this is probably the best that anyone �b7 Southold Town Planning Board Page Fourteen November 10, 2003 could hope for. This will go along well with storage for a lot of things besides homeowners and businesses and the intensity is a whole lot less than it really could be and I have been here a long time. With that, Marty, do you want to — Mr. Sidor: WHEREAS, the proposed site plan, to be known as the Site Plan for Mattituck Self Storage, is for a new 7,500 sq. ft. 2nd floor addition with renovation of an existing 22,996 sq. ft. building and maintenance of a 14,184 sq. ft. metal storage building on a 1.697 acre parcel in the LI Zone; and WHEREAS, Thomas & Susan McCarthy are the owners of the property known and designated as 885 Wickham Avenue, located approximately 151' south of Route 48 on the west side of Wickham Avenue, in Mattituck, SCTM#1000-140-2-9; and WHEREAS, a formal application for approval of this site plan was submitted on October 29, 2002; and WHEREAS, September 6, 2002, the applicant received approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health, H.S. reference number C10-02-0008 on the plan prepared by Donald Jewell, Architect, dated August 14, 2002; and WHEREAS, on July 15, 2003, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (Article 8), Part 617, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board established itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration on September 8, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Mattituck Fire District Board of Fire Commissioners responded on July 25, 2003, after review of the site plan, and recommended a SCWA fire hydrant to be located at the northwest corner of said property for fire suppression; the applicant agreed to the condition and the Planning Board accepted the recommendations for approval; and WHEREAS, on August 6, 2003, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed and conditionally approved the proposed site plan application with the request that a final schedule of colors and design of the sign be submitted; and WHEREAS, the site plan, dated February 14, 2001 and last revised October 8, 2003, was certified by the Southold Town Building Inspector on October 21, 2003; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2003, the Town Engineer reviewed and approved the site plan and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2003, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed and approved the proposed site plan application colors and sign detail as submitted; and Southold Town Planninq Board Page Fifteen November 10, 2003 WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the site plan prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno, Land Surveyor, dated February 14, 2001 and last revised October 8, 2003, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys with the following conditions and subject to a one year review from the date of the building permit: 1. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. The lighting must meet the Town Code requirements. 2. Plant one tree in the front yard instead of the evergreen hedge as shown. 3. At the new entrances on Wickham Avenue the new curbing and asphalt pavement needs to align all new surfaces with existing conditions adjacent to Wickham Ave. All required reconstruction of the roadway within the Town Owned Right-of-Way 'a be the responsibility of the owner, applicant or developer. Mr. Caggiano: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. I'd like to thank you all for coming. We'll proceed here. ********** Hearings Held Over From Previous Meetings: Chairman Orlowski: Perino, Joseph - This proposed major subdivision is for 7 lots on 20.8211 acres. The property is located on the south side of Main Road, 150' west of Sigsbee Road in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-122-7-9. There is no action to be taken since it's held up in the moratorium. I'll entertain a motion to keep it open. Mr. Caggiano: So moved. �9 Southold Town Planning Board Page Sixteen November 10, 2003 Mr. Edwards: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ******************** MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS, LOT LINE CHANGES AND SET- OFF APPLICATIONS Final Determinations: Chairman Orlowski: Raake, Robert & Barbara - This proposed lot line change will transfer 2,211 sq. ft. from SCTM#1000-113-13-18 to SCTM#1000-113-13-19 and transfer 2,211 sq. ft. from SCTM#1000-113-13-19 to SCTM#1000-113-13-18. The property is located south of Westphalia Avenue in Mattituck. Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to transfer 2,211 sq. ft. t'rom SCTM#1000-113-13- 18 to SCTM#1000-113-13-19 and transfer 2,211 sq. ft. from SCTM#1000-113-13-19 to SCTM#1000-113-13-18; and WHEREAS, following the transfer, Lot 1 will equal 38,387.92 square feet and Lot 2 will equal 59,220 square feet and no reduction in lot area will occur as a result of the action; and WHEREAS, all conditions of conditional final approval have been met; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the maps, dated as revised January 30, 2003, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the maps. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Southold Town Planning Board Page Seventeen November 10, 2003 Chairman Orlowski: Adamowicz/Fraser- This proposed minor subdivision will subdivide a 2 acre improved lot from a 71.4 acre parcel. Suffolk County will purchase fee title on 59 acres and the Town of Southold will purchase the fee title on 10 acres. The property is located s/o the fork of C.R. 48 and Sound Avenue in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-121-5-4.1 Mr..Caggiano: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, this proposed 3 lot minor conservation subdivision will subdivide a 71.42 acre parcel into 3 lots where Lot 1 equals 10 acres of which the Town of Southold is in contract to purchase fee title for open space purposes, Lot 2 equals 2 acres with Development Rights intact and Lot 3 equals 59.42 acres which Suffolk County will purchase fee title for open space purposes; and WHEREAS, the parcel is located within an R-80 Zoning District and the proposed action conforms to the R-80 minimum zoning requirements; and WHEREAS, on September 30, 2003, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed an uncoordinated review of this unlisted action. The Planning Board established itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration, and WHEREAS, on September 30, 2003, the Southold Town Planning Board granted sketch plan approval on the maps dated August 8, 2003; and WHEREAS, on October 31, 2003, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services issued approval; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the maps, dated as revised August 27, 2003, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? Christopher Calderone: I'm Chris Calderone. I represent the Adamowicz and Fraser Families. There is one representation that is made on the map itself that states the removing of the house and also it says garage and actually the garage itself sits next to the barn which we would like to retain the barn because, you know, it has some significance as far as the shape that it is in and it will look nice on the property. The garage sits so close to it that it really doesn't make sense to try to rip the garage down itself. It is in good condition. I would just ask you to, at some point in the future, when I Southold Town Planninq Board Page Eighteen November 10, 2003 am here to apply for a building permit to put a house on it once the other structure is gone, to allow the ability of that garage to stay with the barn itself. I could show you on the map itself what I am referring to if that helps. Mark Terry: The removal of the house was a condition from the Suffolk County Department of Health for septic as well as water supply. I don't see any problem with him retaining the garage. Chairman Orlowski: Is that all right? Chris Calderone: That was it. Thank you very much. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments on the motion? Hearing none, all those in favor? Ayes. Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: Smith, Diane Alec - This proposed application is for a minor subdivision on 3.915 acres. The property is located on the north side of SR 25, 2426.68' west of its intersection with Elijah's Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-109-1-7 Mr. Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following resolution: WHEREAS, the proposed minor subdivision involves the subdividing of a 3.915 acre parcel into 2 lots where Lot 1 equals 85,265 sq. ft. and Lot 2 equals 85,265 sq. ft; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 2000, the Zoning Board of Appeals, in its Decision #4812, granted an area variance for a non-conforming lot (Lot 1) following the exclusion of the wetland area; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals, in a subsequent memorandum dated October 12, 2001, agreed to a revised lay-out which is reflected in the map currently before the Planning Board, dated as revised September 27, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board granted sketch plan approval on November 5, 2001 on the map, dated September 27, 2001; and WHEREAS, on January 15, 2002 the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, granted a Negative Declaration for this unlisted action; and WHEREAS, on November 26, 2001 the Town of Southold Board of Trustees issued a Letter of Non-Jurisdiction, pursuant to Chapter 97, for the proposed action; and Southold Town Planning Board Page Nineteen November 10, 2003 WHEREAS, the State of New York Department of Transportation issued a Highway Work Permit (Number 1002-0097) on May 24, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services approved the proposed action on November 22, 2002; and WHEREAS, all conditions of conditional final approval have been met; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the maps, dated as revised September 27, 2003, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the maps. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. Setting of Final Hearings: l Chairman Orlowski: Corso, Louis & Luba - This proposed lot line change will transfer 1.13 acres from a 4.7 acre Parcel B (SCTM#1000-83-2-11.11)to a 3.4 acre Parcel A (SCTM#1000-83-2-11.10). A 50 ft. right-of-way will be imposed upon Parcel A to provide ingress and egress to Parcel B. The property is located n/o Oregon Road.and e/o Cox Lane in Cutchogue. Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to transfer 1.13 acres from a 4.71 acre unimproved Parcel B (SCTM#1000-83-2-11.10) to a .3.38 acre improved Parcel A (SCTM#1000- 83-2-11.11) in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, following the transfer Parcel A (1000-83-2-11.11) will equal 4.51 acres and Parcel B (1000-83-2-11.10)will equal 3.57 acres and will conform to the minimum requirement of the zoning district (80,000 sq. ft.); therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, do an uncoordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. �l3 Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty November 10, 2003 Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. Mr. Cremers: In addition - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, December 8, 2003, at 6:00 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps, dated May 7, 2003. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: Schneider, Ernest- This proposal is to transfer .313 acres from SCTM#1000-90-4-6 (Lot 2) to SCTM#1000-90-4-5 (Lot 1) in the R-40 Zoning District. The parcel is located at 915 Lakeside Drive in Southold. Mr. Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following resolution: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a lot line adjustment between SCTM#1000-90-4-5 (Lot 1) and SCTM#1000-90-4-6 (Lot 2); and WHEREAS, Lot 1 is unimproved and Lot 2 is improved; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to transfer .313 acres from Lot 1 to Lot 2; and WHEREAS, following the action, Lot 1 will equal 49,591 sq. ft. and Lot 2 will equal 43,956 sq. ft.; and WHEREAS, on December 28, 2001, the Southold Town Trustees issued a permit for the action; and WHEREAS on September 4, 2002, The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation issued a Article 25 Tidal Wetland Permit (# 1-4738-02919/00001) for the action; and Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-One November 10, 2003 WHEREAS, on July 10, 2003, the Board of Appeals granted a variance for the proposed action; therefore be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, December 8, 2003, at 6:05 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps, dated November 18, 1998, and last revised September 25, 2002. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman.Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Aves: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Sketch Determinations: Chairman Orlowski: Grattan, Joseph & Barbara - This proposal is to set-off a 1.83 acre lot with access from Depot Lane from a 27.446 acre parcel. The property is located 147 feet n/o School House Lane and w/o Depot Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-102-1-9 Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, this proposal is to set off a 1.83 acre improved lot from a 27.44 acre parcel (SCTM# 1000-102-1-9)with access from Depot Lane; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, do an uncoordinated review of this unlisted action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. Mr. Cremers: In addition — Southold Town Planninq Board Page Twenty-Two November 10, 2003 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional sketch plan approval on the maps, dated August 14, 2003, subject to the following conditions: 1. There is no key map on the survey; please include a key map. 2. Include the names and addresses of the property owners on the survey. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Axles: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. Chairman Orlowski: Duffy, Estate of Alice G. - This proposal is to set-off a .93 acre lot from an 8.15 acre parcel. In addition, a lot line change is proposed to transfer .09 acres from SCTM#1000-63-2-6 to SCTM#1000-63-2-5. Following the transfer, SCTM# 1000- /� 63-2-5 will equal .502 acres. The parcel is located on the east side of Railroad Avenue, ( 365.25 north of Hummel Avenue, in Southold. Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, this proposal is to set-off a .93 acre improved lot from a 8.15 acre parcel; and WHEREAS, in addition, a lot line change is proposed to transfer .09 acres from SCTM# 1000-63-2-6 to SCTM#1000-63-2-5 and, following the transfer, SCTM#1000-63-2-5 will equal .502 acres; and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold is in contract to purchase Development Rights on 7.13 acres of the 8.15 acre parcel; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, do an uncoordinated review of this unlisted action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? �/Lo Southold Town Planninq Board Page Twenty-Three November 10, 2003 Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. Mr. Cremers: In addition - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional sketch plan approval on the maps, dated June 24, 2003, subject to the following conditions: 1. There is no key map on the survey; please include a key map upon the survey. 2. The zoning district is not identified upon the survey; amend the survey to show the zoning district. 3. Include all listed property owners with addresses upon the survey. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor l Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. Chairman Orlowski: Booth, Edward - This proposal is to set off a 2 acre lot from an 8.05 acre parcel. The property is located on the north side of Sound View Avenue, 1,669 feet e/o Lighthouse Road in Southold. SCTM#1000-50-2-15 Mr. Caggiano: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, this proposal is to set off a 2 acre lot from an 8.05 acre parcel; and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold's Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy, adopted unanimously by the Town Board in January 2000, encourages the use of private conservation measures including gifts of conservation easements; and WHEREAS, the owner of the above-referenced property is willing to voluntarily grant a conservation easement to the Peconic Land Trust which protects important natural resources and scenic values and reduces the potential residential density on the property from 4 lots to no more than 2 lots; therefore be it 217 Southold Town Planning,Board Page Twenty-Four November 10, 2003 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional sketch plan approval on the maps, dated June 10, 2003, subject to the following condition: 1. Please submit a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Tidal Wetland Permit for the action. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes. Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: Zoumas at Bawiew,- This proposal is to subdivide a 47.71 acre parcel into 6 residential lots where Lot 1 equals 91,226 sq. ft.; Lot 2, 86,235 sq. ft.; Lot 3, 82,606 sq. ft.; Lot 4, 82,635 sq. ft.; Lot 5, 83,210 sq. ft. and clustered Lot 6 known as Gay Reese, 21,500 sq. ft. and 37.70 acres of open space (to be labeled as Lot 7). The Town of Southold is in contract to acquire the fee title of 37:70 acres (to be labeled as Lot 7) for open space purposes. The property is locatedn the north side of North Bayview Rd., +/- 200' west of Brigantine Dr., Southold. �5CTM#1000-79-4-17.17 Do you want to do that, Marty? Mr. Sidor: WHEREAS, this proposal is to subdivide a 47.71 acre parcel into 6 residential lots where Lot 1 equals 91,226 sq. ft.; Lot 2, 86,235 sq. ft.; Lot 3, 82,606 sq. ft.; Lot 4, 82,635 sq. ft.; Lot 5, 83,210 sq. ft. and clustered Lot 6 known as Gay Reese, 21,500 sq. ft. and 37.70 acres of open space (to be labeled as Lot 7); and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold is in contract to acquire the fee title of 37.70 acres (to be labeled as Lot 7) for open space purposes; and WHEREAS, the Gay Reese Lot (6) is a clustered lot equal to 21,500 sq. ft. Therefore, the clustered open space needed to satisfy the yield requirement (80,000 sq. ft.) is 1.34 acres. The clustered open space is a part of Lot 7; and WHEREAS, it is the understanding of the Planning Board that the applicant has agreed to file a Covenant & Restriction upon Lots 1 through 5 that limits clearing to 1 acre upon each lot; and WHEREAS, on October 29, 2003, the Planning Board received a Site Ecological Sensitivity Report prepared by Nelson Pope and Voorhis, LLC; and Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-Five November 10, 2003 WHEREAS, the Site Ecological Sensitivity Report found that impacts to the flora and fauna would be minimal if the project were implemented as planned; and WHEREAS, On November 10, 2003 a Phase I Archeological/ Historical Sensitivity Evaluation and Survey Bayyiew Subdivision, Great Hog Neck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York (November 2003)was submitted and concluded that no significant prehistoric or historic archeological sites exist within the area to be developed and no further testing is recommended; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act pursuant to 6 NYCRR PART 617, Section 617.7 establishes itself as lead agency for the proposed action and as lead agency grants a Negative Declaration for the proposed action. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. Mr. Sidor: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional sketch plan approval on the plat, dated & last revised on September 2, 2003, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Town does not recognize the formation of the Gay Reese Parcel pursuant to §100-24, Lot Recognition. Therefore the parcel is a part of SCTM#1000-79-4-17.17. Amend the plat to include a solid line around the boundary of the Gay Reese Parcel and label the parcel as Lot 6. 2. Omit Parcel B upon the plat and include the following notation upon the plat: Note: The Gay Reese Parcel is 21,500 sq. ft. Therefore, the cluster open space yield requirement 58,500 sq. ft or 1.34 acres is a part of Lot 7. 3. Change the reference to Parcel A to read Lot 7. 4. Submit written verification of ingress and egress to the Gay Reese Parcel. 5. Submit a road and drainage plan for Road A together with a bond estimate for all improvements for review. 6. Pursuant to A108-45, street trees are required. Please include the number and type of street trees proposed upon the plat. The Planning Board Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-Six November 10, 2003 recommends that the applicant propose the mature, healthy, existing trees on site. 7. Submit draft Covenants and Restrictions including: a. The limit of clearing requirements upon Lots 1 through 5. Permissible maintenance activities of the Natural Vegetation Retention Buffer. Note, that the Natural Vegetation Retention Buffer is an "undisturbed" buffer and must be noted as such. b. Language stating that cluster open space acreage 1.11 (to be amended to 1.34 acres) is a part of Lot 7. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. Sketch Extensions: Chairman Orlowski: East Marion Fire District- This proposal is for a cluster set-off of a 30,000 sq. ft. parcel from an existing 163,229 sq. ft. parcel. The property is located approximately 367 feet west of Stars Road, on the north side of the Main Road, in East Marion. SCTM#1000-31-3-11.30 Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, this proposal is for a cluster set-off of a 30,000 square foot parcel from an existing 163,229 square foot parcel located on the Main Road, approximately 367'west of Stars Road in East Marion (SCTM#1000-31-3-11.30); and WHEREAS, following the transfer, Lot 1 will equal 133,229 square feet and Lot 2 will equal 30,000 square feet, pursuant to Article XVIII Cluster Development (100-180) of the Town of Southold Town Code, whereby the 10,000 square feet normally required for Lot 2 is being left with Lot 1; and WHEREAS, the applicant sought to extend the May 13, 2003 conditional sketch plan approval date for six months; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2003 the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed an uncoordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-Seven November 10, 2003 agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension from the date of this resolution on the conditional sketch plan approval on the map, dated May 9, 2003, subject to the following conditions: 1. The 2 story framed house structure located on Lot 1 be moved within twelve (12) months of the date of this resolution unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant and granted by the Planning Board. The new location of the structure must be within the building envelope of Lot 2 and conform to all applicable setbacks as defined by Section 100-31 as required by the Town Code of the Town of Southold. 2. The final map of the Clustered Set-Off for East Marion Fire District conform and comply with Article XVIII Section 100-181 of the Southold Town Code as required. 3. The final map be revised to include proper size of Lot 1 & Lot 2 and state that in the event of future subdivision of Lot 1, the yield calculation of Lot 1 must deduct 10,000 square feet of Lot 2 permanent cluster open space. 4. The submittal ofght (8) paper prints and three (3) mylars maps, must contain a current stamp off, Health Department approval and must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. 5. Please submit a New York State Department of Transportation curb cut permit as required. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ******************** MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS, LOT LINE CHANGES, SET OFF APPLICATIONS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Lead Agency Coordination: Chairman Orlowski: Kaloski, Michael - This proposal will subdivide an 8.3 acre parcel (SCTM#1000-102-4-7.1) into 2 lots; where Lot 1 equals 2.02 acres and Lot 2 equals 012/ Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-Eight November 10, 2003 5.35 acres. In addition, a lot line change will transfer .402 acres from SCTM#1000-102- 4-7.1 to SCTM#1000-102-4-7.2. Following the transfer, SCTM#1000-102-4-7.2 will equal .918 acres. The property is located on Alvahs La., 2,056 ft. n/o Main Rd. (NYS Route 25) & s/o Middle Rd., CR 48, in Cutchogue: Mr. Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following resolution: WHEREAS, this proposal will subdivide a 7.788 acre parcel, SCTM#1000-102-4-6.2, into 2 lots where Lot 1 equals 2.02 acres and Lot 2 equals 5.35 acres, in addition, with a lot line change that will transfer .402 acres from SCTM#1000-102-4-6.2 to SCTM#1000-102-4-7.1 which, following the transfer, will equal .918 acres; and WHEREAS, on September 23, 2003, the Southold Town Board adopted Resolution No. 642 of 2003 approving a conditional waiver from Local Law No. 3 of 2002, Local Law No. 3 of 2003 and Local Law No.13 of 2003 for the proposed action; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board start the SEQRA lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action on the map dated June 11, 2003. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any rbstions on the motion? All those in favor? //I Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: Forestbrook at Bayview - This proposal is to subdivide a 37.75 acre parcel into 7 lots where Lot 1 equals 2.5 acres; Lot 2, 1.72 acres; Lot 3, 1.50 acres; Lot 4, 1.50 acres; Lot 5, 1.56 acres; Lot 6, 2.45 acres and Parcel A (to be labeled as Lot 7), 25.75 acres. The Town of Southold is in contract to acquire the fee title of Parcel A (to be labeled as Lot 7) 25.75 acres for open space purposes. The property is located n/o North Bayview Road, 180 feet w/o Jacobs Lane, in Southold. SCTM#1000-79-2-7 Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following resolution: WHEREAS, this proposal is to subdivide a 37.75 acre parcel into 7 lots where Lot 1 equals 2.5 acres; Lot 2, 1.72 acres; Lot 3, 1.50 acres; Lot 4, 1.50 acres; Lot 5, 1.56 acres; Lot 6, 2.45 acres and Parcel A (to be labeled as Lot 7), 25.75 acres; and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold is in contract to acquire the fee title of Parcel A (to be labeled as Lot 7) 25.75 acres for open space purposes; therefore, be it f Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-Nine November 10, 2003 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQRA coordination process for this unlisted action. Mr. Cagggiano: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. *********** Chairman Orlowski: McFeely, John - This proposed major subdivision is for 6 lots on a 30.785 acre parcel where the Town of Southold and the County of Suffolk will acquire fee title to 24.041 acres for open space purposes. The property is located n/o NYS Route 25 and the LIRR Easement in Laurel. SCTM#1000-125-1-14 Mr. Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following resolution: WHEREAS, this proposed major subdivision is for 6 lots on a 30.785 acre parcel wher the Town of Southold and the County of Suffolk will acquire fee title to 24.041 acres fcr open space purposes; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQRA coordination process for this unlisted action. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ******************** SITE PLANS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Lead Agency Coordination: Chairman Orlowski: The Old Barge Restaurant - This proposed amended site plan is for a new second floor addition of 1,851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of Southold Town Planning Board Page Thirty November 10, 2003 existing building space on a 1.4438 acre parcel in the MII Zone. The property is located approximately 1,953' west of Dolphin Drive on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold. SCTM41000-56-6-8.7 Mr. Caggiano: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes an amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1,851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acre parcel in the MII Zone, located approximately 1,953' west of Dolphin Drive on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEAR lead agency coordination process for this unlisted action. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? l� Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ******************** APPROVAL OF PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Chairman Orlowski: Board to approve the minutes of July 8, 2002. Mr. Cremers: So move. Mr. Edwards: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: Board to approve the minutes of October 14, 2003. Mr. Cremers: So move. oZa�- Southold Town Planning Board Page Thirty-One November 10, 2003 Mr. Edwards: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: Board to approve the minutes of October 27, 2003. Mr. Cremers: So move. Mr. Edwards: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. There is nothing Ic.ft on my agenda. If somebody would like to say something or spread anything on the minutes, they may do so. Otherwise, we will adjourn and go into a Work Session. Do you want to say something? Patricia Moore, Esq.: Yes, something very brief. On the Zoumas Subdivision, at this point, I would ask that you forward whatever the Water Authority requires which I believe would be the Negative Declaration. Their Water Availability Letters were assured to us after the SEQRA review is completed by the Town so the speed in which the Water Authority provides those letters will then determine how quickly the Health Department acts on this. So, I would ask for your cooperation and do whatever you can on your side to see that this project moves forward. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: O.K. Got that, Mark? Mark Terry: Yes. Chairman Orlowski: Any other questions or comments? (There were none.) I'll entertain a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Cremers: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Southold Town Planning Board Page Thirty-Two November 10, 2003 Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. �I There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Carol Kalin Barbara Rudder —Z -ON nett Orlowski, r., C airman