Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-08/11/2003 ING OARD MB PENNETTBORLOWSSEI,Jg„ERS oG p,0.Box 1179 Chairman co y� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Southold, New York 11971-0959 i RICHARD CAGGIANO Z WILLIAM J. CREMERS O Telephone(631) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS y 0� Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDOR ��.( `t►a PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MINUTES August 11, 2003 6:00 p.m. Present were: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Richard Caggiano, Member William J. Cremers, Member Kenneth L. Edwards, Member Martin H. Sidor, Member Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Carol Kalin, Secretary SETTING OF THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING Chairman Orlowski: I would like to call this meeting to order. The first order of business is for the Board to set Monday, September 8, 2003 at 6:00 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, as the time and place for the next regular Planning Board Meeting. Mr. Cremers: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes. Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ******************** PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Orlowski: 6:00 p.m. - Morton, Keith Scott - This proposal is to set off a 1.94 acre improved lot, located within the R-80 Zoning District, from a 17.44 acre parcel with access from Orchard Street in Orient. SCTM#1000-25-4-11.6 Southold Town Planning Board Page Two August 11, 2003 I will ask if there are any comments or questions on this proposed set-off? Charles Cuddy, Esg.: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Board: I am Charles Cuddy. I represent the applicant. As you know, this has been through review both here and in the Health Department. At the Health Department, we covenant that there would be only three additional lots after this lot. I believe that the application meets all of your requirements for set-offs and I would ask you to approve it. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? Troy Gustayson: This is not a comment- a question. Troy Gustayson - I am a neighbor in Orient. Just a question regarding the set-off and how it effects the remaining property. What is the connection here between this and what is going to be the remaining fifteen or so acres? Chairman Orlowski: Well, the parcel that is remaining will be there but the covenant put on by the applicant with the Health Department understanding is going to be three lots - up to three lots if they do that. Troy Gustayson: They would normally yield how many houses under current- Chairman Orlowski: Probably at least—total? Troy Gustayson: Seven additional homes? Chairman Orlowski: No. There probably would be at least four to five, right? Troy Gustayson: There is concern in Orient about the transition of this property from a farm to a housing development and there is a sense that, even with a total of four houses on there, there has been a significant change in signals from the applicant based on what he said he was going to originally do versus what he apparently is doing now and, to us, that is unfortunate because it is one of the few remaining agricultural parcels close to the village and, obviously, the second part of this is a whole other question and I assume it will come before you at some point. But a lot of people are not happy about this. Chairman Orlowski: Yes, the Board is sensitive to that fact and we worked with the applicant and think he has tried the preservation route with the County and I guess he is still actively pursuing that and there was I think, I believe, four more lots in this application and they cut it down to just the one lot and remaining seventeen acres. So, that is all - Troy Gustayson: The one lot that could become three additional houses? Chairman Orlowski: The large lot, yes, and that could be and, right now, there is not a law to stop that so - Southold Town Planning Board Page Three August 11, 2003 Troy Gustayson: Yes, we understand that. There is a hope that they will be able to work something out through the County or Town program, obviously, and I think some neighbors are prepared to maybe step up and see that they can do something to encourage that too because, again, even with only- only four houses on that property, that is a significant transition from what that place has been historically. Chairman Orlowski: Well, it's good to know. It has happened in other County deals. I have been on that committee and sometimes with neighbors involved in making it work including - Troy Gustayson: Yeah, we are trying to get the Land Trust involved too. Obviously, there will be more said in terms of the remaining fifteen acres. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: O.K. Any other comments? Hearing none, any questions from the Board? Hearing none, I will entertain a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Cremers: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. (The hearing was closed at 6:05 . P.M.) Does anyone have a pleasure on this? Mr. Caqqiano: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to set off an improved 1.94 acre lot from a 17.44 acre parcel; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed an uncoordinated review of this unlisted action. The Planning Board established itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration on November 4, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Suffolk County Department of Health issued approval for the action on June 6, 2003; and WHEREAS, on May 22, 2003, the applicant filed with the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk in Liber 12252, Page 432, a Suffolk County Department of Health Private Well Southold Town Planninq Board Page Four August 11, 2003 Covenant conditioning that the residual acreage (15.50 acres) cannot be subdivided into more than three (3) lots; and WHEREAS, the Orient Fire District, in a letter dated May 20, 2003, recommends that the applicant install an electric fire well located not more than 100 feet from Orchard Street at the entrance of the property and the Planning Board concurs with this recommendation; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the maps, last revised March 20, 2003, subject to the following conditions. These conditions must be met within six (6) months of the resolution: 1. The Planning Board reviewed the park and playground requirement. As per Section 106-38 of the Subdivision Regulations, the amount to be deposited with the Town for park and playground services is now$5,000 per lot for each vacant lot in the subdivision. A park and playground fee of$5,000 will be required prior to any endorsement of the subdivision by the Planning Board. 2. The submission of three (3) mylar maps and five (5) paper copies with Suffolk County Department of Health Approval. 3. To satisfy the Orient Fire District's request for an electric firewell, the Planning Board is requiring that the applicant file a covenant and restriction mandating that prior to the issuance of a building permit upon the residual 15.50 acre parcel, the specified firewell will be installed. The Planning Board is also requiring that following the installation of the firewell, that the operation is verified, in writing, by the Orient Fire District and submitted to this office. Following approval of the covenant and restriction by the Planning Board, the document must be filed with the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk and, upon filing, the liber and page number recorded upon the plat. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Aye Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. Chairman Orlowski: 6:05 p.m. - Purita/Sawicki - This proposed lot line amendment will transfer 6,626 sq. ft. from SCTM#1000-51-3-4.3 to SCTM#1000-51-3-4.1 and transfer 9,860 sq. ft. from SCTM#1000-51-3-4.3 to SCTM#1 000-51-3-6.1. Following the transfer, SCTM#1000-51-3-4.1 will equal .60 acres and SCTM#1000-51-3-6.1 will equal .61 Southold Town Planning Board Page Five August 11, 2003 acres. The property is located north of the intersection of Old North Road and CR 48 and south of Sound View Avenue in Southold in the A-C Zoning District. Are there any questions on this lot line amendment? Abigail Wickham, Esq.: Good evening, my name is Abigail Wickham, representing the applicant. I am happy to answer any questions you or someone else here might have. Chairman Orlowski: We don't have any questions yet. Are there any other comments? (There were none.)Any other comments from the Board? Hearing no further comments, I will entertain a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Cremers: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. (The hearing was closed at 6:12 P.M.) Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to transfer 6,626 sq. ft. from SCTM#1000-51-3-4.3 to SCTM#1000-51-3-4.1 and transfer 9,860 sq. ft. from SCTM#1000-51-3-4.3 to SCTM# 1000-51-3-6.1; and WHEREAS, following the transfer, SCTM#1000-51-3-4.1 will equal .60 acres, SCTM#1000-51-3-6.1 will equal .61 acres and SCTM#1000-51-3-4.3 will be reduced in area from 27.40 acres to 27.03 acres; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed an uncoordinated review of this Unlisted Action and issued a Negative Declaration on July 14, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Lot Line Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys, dated as revised June 20, 2003, and authorize the Chairman to endorse Southold Town Planninq Board Page Six August 11, 2003 the final surveys subject to fulfillment of the following condition. This condition must be met within six (6) months of the resolution: 1. The filing of new deeds with the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk pertaining to the amendment of the lot line and, upon filing, submittal of a copy to this office. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: 6:10 p.m. - Peconic Landing - This proposed amended site plan is for a new 26 car parking lot near the Community Center. The property is located on the north side of Main Road,1,121' east of Sound Rd., in Greenport. SCTM#1000-35-1-25 Does anyone have any comments on this amended site plan? Charles Cuddy, Esq.: Charles Cuddy, for the applicant. Tom Wolpert is with me from Young and Young. This parking area is indispensable to the residents of Peconic Landing because it allows them to use the Community Center. So, it is absolutely for them something that they need, something that they use, and certainly we would hope that the Board would not have any problem approving this. It certainly does not disturb or disrupt anything in the community and, at this point in time, those residents rely upon that parking facility. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? Russos Abadiotakis: Yes, sir. My name is Russos Abadiotakis. I am the owner right next to it. There was a house over there — one-family house, like supposed to be residential. They knock down the house. Now, they want to put parking over there. Now they want to put parking - they put in the center of the development and when they make the plans, they should make one plan for the whole thing - don't make them, you know, every six months or every year or something. You people are the ones - you make the plans, they approve it and then you ask us if we agree. I mean, I don't think that should work like that. I buy the zoning every month from here. I don't think the Planning Board and the Zoning Board operates normal - I don't think so. I'm not trying to knock anybody down but I think that they should consider the people before they approve a plan. That's the way it should be done. In the back of my house, is the golf course. My house is there. In all the houses in town here - I don't know if you people know or not— it is the oldest estate house. Now, there was a farm there; there was horses there. There was cows there; there was a lot of things when I bought the house. Three years ago, I tried 1 Southold Town Planninq Board Page Seven August 11, 2003 to rebuild a piece of the garage in the back. They gave me so much trouble from the city hall here. Cost me maybe ten thousand dollars. Lot of troubles. They call the SPCA; they call the Board of Health; they call the - horses - I mean, I have the cows - I have no cows near my house - maybe three hundred feet. Now, the golf course, they got the machines over there. They put the machines in the side they're supposed to. Now, about five, six, seven years ago they ...(inaudible) a permit to build a building right next to my fence - the golf course. Now, I said to them they could put it behind ...(inaudible) fifty feet from my lot. They put it behind so they can store the machines there. Now, what they are doing -they put about thirty feet fence in the back of my property all way through and they back up all the trucks and the cars in my property. I got over a hundred pictures to show you, including today. Now, I don't want to have all around my house parking lots. They should be what they should be. I mean, the rules are the rules for everybody. If we make zoning, we should follow the zoning. Over here - I think, you know, say that any golf course, any country clubs, they shouldn't put anything fifty feet from any property line. Now, you see they put a thirty feet fence and they park against my fence. Now, they make me like - I swear to God I feel like I am in Harlem when I come in the house. That's only when I pay the tax I feel like. I mean, this thing, I don't bother nobody. I come here and you know- Chairman Orlowski: I feel for you but that's a totally different issue than what we are looking at right now. I think you have to proceed with the Building Department and talk to them about that issue. This is just an expansion of the parking in Peconic Landing and there is just something that is added on now because we came up.short the first time and they added some cars but I know it is not close to your house or in your back yard as this is. Russos Abadiotakis: This is my lot. What happens if I want to build a house next to it— I'm going to look at the parking lot? What happens if my son wants to build a house next to it? Chairman Orlowski: Is this the one you are talking about? Russos Abadiotakis: The new one, yes. Chairman Orlowski: The golf course? Russos Abadiotakis: No, no - the new one. What happens if I want to build on that side which I took five hundred feet from the house? What— I'm going to look right next to the parking lot? Charles Cuddy, Esq.: Mr. Chairman, if I may— Russos Abadiotakis: I mean, they build they break up a one-family house which the statute was there for maybe fifty, seventy years there. They knock down the one-family house to make a parking lot? I mean, we switch the zoning any where we - 130 Southold Town Planning Board Page Eight Auqust 11, 2003 Charles Cuddy, Esq.: Mr. Chairman, it is not this parcel and I would be happy to talk to this gentleman on behalf of Peconic Landing. But this one, as you know, is more than a thousand feet from the road so it can't be next to his house. It just is not possible. Russos Abadiotakis: How many feet is it going to be away from my lot line? Mr. Cuddy: I will be happy to talk to you about it. Russos Abadiotakis: No, no. Can I ask the Planning Board how many feet away from my lot line? Chairman Orlowski: This here? Russos Abadiotakis: Yes. Chairman Orlowski: I think it is a whole lot further than you - Russos Abadiotakis: I think it- Chairman Orlowski: I think I am just following you - I think that you are talking about the golf course property. Russos Abadiotakis: No, no. I brought it both up to show you that I have already a problem in the back. I have got to go to court. I'm going to sue the city hall because it cost me ten grand to put a lawyer to get three surveys I got on the property because Mr. Forrester wants me to make a new survey. I made three surveys so far. So, I made a third one. I mean, this is going too far. I mean, whatever- fifth survey? Now, there is a one-family house built there for fifty, sixty years. They knock it down and put a parking lot? No way. Bruno Semon: Mr. Chairman, there is no demolition involved in this site plan at all. There is no single-family dwelling where the parking lot is going. Russos Abadiotakis: What? Chairman Orlowski: There is no dwelling being torn down in this application. Russos Abadiotakis: Is the parking lot going to be in the front of Route 48 on the road? Chairman Orlowski: No. Russos Abadiotakis: How far back? Chairman Orlowski: About a thousand feet. Thomas Wolpert: May I speak? Southold Town Planning Board Page Nine August 11, 2003 Chairman Orlowski: Yes. Mr. Wolpert, Engineer with Young and Young: The parking lot - it's a twenty-six car— twenty-five or twenty-six car parking lot - which is the subject of this public hearing is roughly in the center of a one hundred forty-five acre parcel and I don't think it is anywhere near any adjacent properties or even within sight. Chairman Orlowski: You do understand that. I mean, it is not even close. Russos Abadiotakis: Why did they knock the house down, then? Chairman Orlowski: No, there is no house being knocked down. Russos Abadiotakis: They did not knock down that house? Chairman Orlowski: No. Russos Abadiotakis: I don't believe it. This property border this ...(inaudible) one-family house in the front of Route 48 about thirty feet away from the front line. Chairman Orlowski: That's not what we are talking about here. Russos Abadiotakis: This is the same development, the same property, the same - Chairman Orlowski: It has nothing to do with this application which we are discussing tonight. I think you could pursue this matter that you have - or question - with the Building Department and ask them because it is not here. O.K.? Russos Abadiotakis: Wait until I see a car parked right next to my house then I am going to come over here and complain again. Chairman Orlowski: Yes. This one won't be there. Any other comments? Frank McIntosh: My name is Frank McIntosh. I live adjacent to Peconic Landing and I have no problem with the proposed site that they are going to use for their twenty-five lot parking facility but my question to the Board is will there be further parking lots that are adjacent to this property, in your opinion? Chairman Orlowski: I don't believe so but they have the right to make that application but I can't - Frank McIntosh: That is such historic land and, of course, my house was built in 1650 as you know. Stanford White was the architect and I am preserving it for the community and we have been very_fortunate. I have a very good relationship with Peconic Landing but I am just concerned and I want to register my concern for any future kind of developments that are around that particular site, because it is cherished land and it really should not be commercialized beyond what's happened now in my opinion. Southold Town Planning Board Page Ten August 11, 2003 Chairman Orlowski: Yes, this parking is just - Frank McIntosh: I know the parking site. I have seen it. I have been to the Planning Board and I saw the map this morning and I am aware of it and I don't have a problem with this whatsoever but I do - I am concerned about future parking lots that might border the road or be adjacent. Chairman Orlowski: It would have to come back here and make an application and we would have to go through this process. Frank McIntosh: And I can monitor that— Chairman Orlowski: Absolutely. Mr. McIntosh: - and I will. Thank you very much. Chairman Orlowski: O.K. Any other comments? Hearing none, any questions from the Board? Hearing no further comments, I will entertain a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Cremers: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. (The public hearing was closed at 6:25 p.m.) Mr. Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to offer the following resolution: WHEREAS, the proposed amended site plan, to be known as Amended Site Plan for Peconic Landing Parking Lot, is for a new 26 car parking lot near the Community Center; and WHEREAS, Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. is the owner of the property known and designated as Peconic Landing, located 1,121' east of Sound Rd., on the north side of Main Rd., in Greenport, SCTM#1000-35-1-25; and WHEREAS, a formal application for approval of this amended site plan was submitted on December 27, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Engineer responded on November 19, 2002 with the review of the drainage calculations and the Planning Board accepted his recommendations for approval; and /33 Southold Town Planning Board Page Eleven August 11, 2003 WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board on June 9, 2003, made a determination that the proposed site plan amendment work is a Type 11 Action and is not subject to review pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617.5; and WHEREAS, the Greenport Fire Department responded on June 22, 2003 after review of the amended site plan and the Planning Board accepted the recommendations for approval; and WHEREAS, the amended site plan, dated October 2, 2002 was certified by the Southold Town Building Inspector on July 7, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the amended site plan prepared by Young & Young, dated October 2, 2002; and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to a one year review from the date of the building permit. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: 6:15 p.m. - Mattituck Park District - This proposed site plan is for a new 2,940 sq. ft. accessory building on a 3.1 acre parcel in the R-40 Zone located at the property known as 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd., on the s/w/c of Peconic Bay Blvd. & Bay Ave., in Mattituck. SCTM#(s)1000-126-6-17 & 1000-126-6-18 1 will ask if there are any questions on this proposed site plan? Leslie Breese: Yes. Hi, I am Leslie Breese and I am an abutter. Our family has continued problems with this park and the lack of any sort of design or planning and their randomness of building whatever they chose to build. The proposed building seems not quite compatible to a park setting. I would like to know exactly what the purpose of this building is for. Can anyone tell me what they are going to hold inside this building? It's going to be with a chain link around it. I would like to know what is there — Southold Town Planning Board Page Twelve August 11, 2003 just feet from where this wonderful playground is for youngsters. This seems incompatible. Abigail Wickham, Esq.: I can answer that, Mr. Chairman, either now or later. Chairman Orlowski: Well, I am sure we are going to have a lot of questions so maybe we can put these all together and have the attorney stand up and answer some of these. O.K.? Leslie Breese: Can I continue? Is there - Chairman Orlowski: Yes, go ahead. Leslie Breese: Over the past thirty years, our family has been an abutter. We have seen continued addition of buildings and structures. This is the first time that we been notified of anything being built. Within - since the Fourth of July, another building has gone up which we were not notified about. I am surprised that we even got notification of this. I have a question about what the total height of this building will be. It is considered to be a one story but it is a pole barn. I would like to know how high it is. Those people whose homes currently face the park have lost their beach view with the construction of more and more of these buildings. This is a park. This is rare property. This is something to cherish, not to destroy. There most be other places better suited for a building - a place that is safer away from the children. I can't imagine the liability of having these trucks pulling up so close to a playground. Parents watch but you can't watch every moment of the day. I think the location is a poor choice. I would like to know what is being housed in there and what other location we might find to put that in there and then maybe they can go back and re-landscape it and make it a true park. It has really run down hill incredibly. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? Edward Herman: My name is Edward Herman. I am from Marlene Lane. I have the same questions as the former speaker did. Number One: What is the height of this building going to be? What is the purpose? Also, are there any other requests going with this building? Is the only request to put up a building? Why would it have to come before the Planning Board? Chairman Orlowski: For site plan to - Edward Herman: Site plan to put a building right in the middle of a large lot and they have to come before the Planning Board and that's the only reason they put the application in is for the erection of that building? Chairman Orlowski: Yes and I think they are taking down the old building and just putting up a new building but we will get some questions answered for you if you want to just have any other questions? Southold Town Planning Board Page Thirteen August 11, 2003 Edward Herman: Fine, thank you. Chairman Orlowski: O.K. Helen Dicking: Hi, I am Helen Dicking and I live at 525 Old Salt Road so I am just east of Veterans Park. Our big concern is the noise that comes from the park after dark, way into one, two, three o'clock in the morning. It is kids that are in the park driving their cars around and doing wheelies and spinning out. I kept a record here these last seven days and, at least four of those nights, there is noise coming from the park at eleven o'clock and midnight. Now, I noticed today that four iron posts have been put in - two on either side of the entrance and the exit with great big rings in these iron posts so that may mean that there is going to be a chain put across. Do any of you know anything about that? Chairman Orlowski: As you bring the questions forward, I think they probably can be answered tonight with the people from the Park District. O.K.? Helen Dicking: O.K. Great, thank you. Chairman Orlowski: Any other questions or comments? Gail, would you want to answer some of these questions? Abigail Wickham, Esg.: Yes, if you are ready for me, yes. I hope I can. Abigail Wickham, representing the Park District and Warren Sambach, who has proceeded with this application and is here to answer some of the technical questions. But, in specific answer to the inquiries, the purpose of the building is to basically replace the very delapidated structures that are there now. The Park District is a quasi municipal organization that is charged with providing park facilities to the entire resident tax payer base of Mattituck. Veterans Beach is a wonderful beach and it is a very heavily used park and the kitchen facilities for the concession, the bathroom facilities there now- they are deplorable. They need to be replaced. There are some old buildings there that house some of the Park District equipment - the Park District, being an entity that raises its funds through taxes, is concerned of doing this not only efficiently, but economically, and they made a decision that those antiquated buildings should be replaced with a structure which will house a new kitchen concession area, up-dated bathroom facilities, a meeting place for its board on a periodic basis because the building that they have now in Mattituck is not meeting park district criteria in terms of use for park facilities that will be sold -the one on the Main Road - and used to help fund this. The balance of the building is being designed, at this point, to house the pieces of equipment that, at this point, service all of the different park facilities in Mattituck and are at various locations. The building was designed in mind with the possibility that at some future time, if the district determines that a more community-based type of building might be available there, that that could be a conversion. But, at this point, it is to economically replace the facilities that are there for the use of the park facility itself with additional space for the equipment that needs to be housed there. I don't believe there have been any recent additions, given what the buildings look like, except for perhaps the playground. The park, I might also add, is not only open space - it is a community facility for park Southold Town Planning Board Page Fourteen August 11, 2003 purposes. In response to the lady who asked the question about the noise, we have attempted to address that many times with the local police department and, yes, when the cement dries around the poles that were just installed, I was advised that a chain will be placed in the evenings to try to address that problem. The height of the building - I am going to have to refer to Mr. Sambach. 13.6 is the average height. Do you know the ridge height? 16 feet is the ridge height. Anything else? Thank you. Roger Breese: An abutter. We were here on July 4th the last time. Yeah, I am not a resident here; I am one of those summer people that nobody seems to like around here. On July 4th, this building did not exist. There was still grass underneath. About two years ago, there was a corral built. The corral was built to store irrigation pipes. Could you tell me what is in the corral today? Well, look at the picture and what I see is wooden ` crates. We are talking about -we are less than fifty feet from the beach. This is an organization that we have that's administering our parks that does not seem care about our parks and we are going to give them authority to build a building? What are they going to do with the building? If we look at the plan on it, to the left side of the building, there is a chain link fence. That chain link fence -the distance from the chain link fence to the playground, is approximately twenty-five feet. Why do you put a chain link fence twenty-five feet from a children's playground? There is going to be something behind that chain-link fence. It is a real problem. I asked the little -the girl who was monitoring the park on Sunday - I said is there a special permit for people to park cars on the beach? She said, oh no, they are not supposed to do that. That picture was taken 1 Sunday at three o'clock in the afternoon. There are three cars parked right on the beach and they are SUVs with their tails up. Why are they there? How did they get there? The parking lot—you're not supposed to go from the parking lot and drive over the grass to the beach to make it convenient. Nobody monitors anything at this park but one of the pictures - I don't even want to give you the one they- you can see that this is on the park in the other corner over by the Marlene Drive Association. The rails in the fence - they were probably changed last year, right? Year before, right? Oh, it must be the year before that, right? Oh, I see. The grass is this high and the rails are like this - broken and it's a split rail fence. The Park doesn't care and we are going to let them build a building? Chairman Orlowski: O.K. Any other comments? Edward Herman: If I may, I would like to add something to that. What these people had said - they are completely right. That split rail fence that separates a property between the Marlene Lane Civic, of which I belong, they are a fifty house civic association - separating our property from the park is a split rail fence that we, at our own expense, have repaired in several places. It is a disgrace. And going down to the water is worse than that. The gentleman is right. The cars come in through the parking lot, they pull up on the grass area right down close to the bluff, and they park there. That park is very poorly maintained. It really is a disgrace. I would also like to know are there any parking restrictions attached to this request? /37 Southold Town Planning Board Page Fifteen August 11, 2003 Chairman Orlowski: The parking is on the site plan and you are supposed to park according to the site plan. I am not sure about parking on the beach because we cannot control that. Mr. Herman: You can't control it? Chairman Orlowski: We can't control it. f Mr. Herman: It's on the Park Department property and they're parking not in the parking area but on the grass area which is not designed for parking and, also, as far as the noise and the people coming down there, we have called the police - I can't tell you how many times - about the cars speeding down Marlene Lane, whipping into the park place there, because they can get in, wheel around there for a while and then they go back up the other way. Every request I have made to the police department has come up with, oh, we can't do anything about that or, oh, we know that's happening, oh, we don't have a radar, we don't have a man that is qualified to run one. Well, what in God's name do they do? They have yet to stop one of those cars speeding down Marlene Lane. There are quite a few young children on that block and there are quite a few elderly. When somebody gets killed down there, then we will see what a splash that makes. Abigail Wickham, Esq.: If I might just - first of all, I would like to correct a statement I made. Mr. Goehringer pointed out that there was a temporary storage garage added which will be removed - it's a movable structure - as soon as the building is up. As to the other comments, the use of the parking lot - those are not really building related. They are issues that we have -the Park District has attempted to address and continues to address. Any one of these people is welcome to come to one of the monthly meetings of the Park District to discuss those issues as opposed to the building issues that we have here this evening. Chairman Orlowski: O.K. Then this structure is a temporary structure then? Abigail Wickham, Esq.: It is, yes. Roger Breese: Roger Breese, back again. If you had a neighbor who didn't take care of anything that he had, would you let him build a new building? Chairman Orlowski: Any other comments? Any questions from the Board? Abigail Wickham, Esq.: In terms of overnight usage that is outside of the Park District's hours, the park closes at dusk. Helen Dicking: That may be the park hours, but it doesn't close at dusk. It is open twenty-four hours a day. The gates are not closed and I appreciate that the steel pipes were driven into the ground today and looks like - and this lady said that there was going to be a chain link fence - but I suspect that the chain link fence will be cut pretty soon. It's not going to work. 13� Southold Town Planning Board Page Sixteen August 11, 2003 Kathleen Knapp: I live on the Boulevard and I do make use of the park. The park has never been closed. There is a fence that can be closed but it has never been closed. Who is going to be in charge of locking the park up? Chairman Orlowski: Could you, please? Gerard Goehringer: I am Gerry Goehringer. As you know, I sent you a letter in rebuttal to the three gentlemen that - actually three people -that wrote me a letter from the Salt Lake Association. This has been a long time coming. During the period of the time that we constructed the playground, we closed the park every night during that project. During the project that is anticipatory-that is proposed before you -we have to close the park every night. We will continue to close that park from now. For the tenure that I have had on the board - and I have been there since 1977 - we have had some communication from prior commissioners where some of the commissioners were in favor and some were opposed to closing the park. We have a new commissioner this year. Myself and Mrs. Zuhoski took it upon ourselves to ask our staff to place these particular steel stanchions - steel pipes in the ground. The park will be chained off. It will either be chained off by an ex-police officer who has just retired, who we have been working with, or it will be chained off by one of the park personnel who is an employee of the park. I am going to say the same thing that I said before, and I don't mean to be counterproductive in saying this, I have never seen any of these people at a meeting. We, meet every -the second Thursday of every month. I do understand their frustration and I do understand the fact that we were working with a limited budget. We intend to put all of our resources into this particular piece of property just as we did - as vigorously as we did -when we built the playground. The letter that I sent to you, which was in rebuttal of the three people from the Salt Lake Village Association, is absolutely true. We intend to replace fences; we intend to take down buildings. We intend to take down fences around buildings and we intend to replace the park to a very pristine nice area which they will all be proud of. I just am a little frustrated and, in the same situation that I said in my letter, that impacting this building is a big mistake with the complaints that they have when these particular complaints can be dealt with at something other than this public hearing. We are attempting to make something nice. We do apologize for any blocking of any water views, however, progress has to go on. That is the reason why the playground was placed where it was placed and that is the reason why the building is being placed in front of the playground. And I assure you that, when this is done, you will be proud of it, the residents of Mattituck and Laurel will be proud of it and all of the residents that use the playground will be proud of it and that is the entire town. That is all I can say to you. If you have any specific questions of me, I would be very happy to answer them. Chairman Orlowski: The Board - I think we are all the same here - it is a Planning Board and it is a board that is responsible for the site plan and the site plan is replacing an old building with a new building. A lot of these issues that you have all brought up here tonight, I think, should be addressed by the Mattituck Park District. As Mr. Goehringer has already said, he would like to have you all come to his meeting and talk to him about this property. I think it is a good thing and it will help you to work with him and Southold Town Planning Board Page Seventeen August 11,.2003 come up with some other things. In regard to the site plan that we are looking at and the parking, you see the site plan on the wall behind you, this is what will be approved or could be approved tonight if the Board would like to and the other things that the Park District or that you are asking them to do, I think, should be addressed at their meeting because.there is nothing here that we can really do in that regard. I don't have any comments or questions. Gerard Goehringer: I just want to apologize regarding the temporary garage that is placed there but once we take the big old barn down, we have no place to put anything at this particular point until we actually close the park. That will eventually be moved to the Aldrich Lane site and to be used in concert with the soccer and the hardball court. Thank you. Chairman Orlowski: O.K. All right, any other comments? Hearing none, I will entertain a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Edwards: So move. Mr. Cremers: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. (The hearing was closed at 6:55 P.M.) What is the pleasure of the Board? Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, the proposed site plan, to be known as Site Plan for the Mattituck Park District, is for a new 2,940 square foot accessory building on a 3.1 acre parcel in the R- 40 Zone; and WHEREAS, Mattituck Park District is the owner of the property known and designated as Mattituck Park District, located at 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd., on the s/w/c of Bay Ave., in Mattituck, SCTM#1000-126-6-18; and WHEREAS, a formal application for approval of this site plan was submitted on May 13, 2003; and WHEREAS, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, on September 1, 2001, issued NYSDEC Permit Number 1-4738-01147/00005 authorizing this project; and Southold Town Planning Board Page Eighteen August 11, 2003 WHEREAS, the applicant has received approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health, dated April 16, 2003, Permit Number c10-00-0015; and WHEREAS, the Mattituck Fire District responded on June 14, 2003 after review of the site plan and the Planning Board accepted the recommendations for approval; and WHEREAS, on June 19, 2003, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed and approved the proposed site plan application; and WHEREAS, the site plan, dated March 13, 2003, was certified by the Southold Town Building Inspector on July 3, 2003; and WHEREAS, the site plan, dated March 13, 2003, was reviewed on July 11, 2003 by the Southold Town Trustees and determined the proposed building to be out of the wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 97 of the Town Wetland Code and Chapter 37 of the Town Code, 2003; and WHEREAS, on June 9, 2003 the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (Article 8), Part 617, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board established itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration on July 14, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Town Engineer has reviewed the drainage calculations and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the site plan prepared by Warren Sambach Sr., dated March 13, 2003, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys with the following condition and subject to a one year review from the date of the building permit; 1. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. Mr. Cagaiano: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? Hearing none, I just want to put into the record that all the correspondence that we've gotten on /4l Southold Town Planning Board Page Nineteen August 11, 2003 this application will be on file and in the file and all the Board Members have read all of this. All those in favor? Aves: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: 6:20 p.m. - Sang Lee Farms - This site plan is for the construction of a 2,600 sq. ft. enclosed farmstand. The property is located at 25180 CR 48 approximately 781' east of Bridge La., in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-84-5-1.2 & 1 Any comments on this site plan? Hearing none, any comments from the Board? (There were no comments.) I'll entertain a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Edwards: So move. Mr. Cremers: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Aves: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. (The hearing was closed at 7:00 P.M.) Do you want to do this, Marty? Mr. Sidor: WHEREAS, the proposed site plan, to be known as Site Plan for Sang Lee Farms, is for a new 2,600 square foot farm stand on 15.306 acres; and WHEREAS, Fred and Karen Lee are the owners of the property known and designated as Sang Lee Farms, 25180 CR 48, Cutchogue, SCTM#1000-84-5-1.2 & 1.3; and WHEREAS, a formal application for approval of this site plan was submitted on December 27, 2002; and WHEREAS, on July 29, 2002, the Suffolk County Department of Planning granted approval for the use of land from which Development Rights were sold for the gravel driveway; and the Suffolk County Farmland Committee concurred with this approval; and Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty August 11, 2003 WHEREAS, on October 17, 2002, the Zoning Board of Appeals granted relief with conditions from Article I, Section 100-13 and Article I, Section 47.3A of the Code for enclosing an agricultural farm stand structure, Application No. 5204; and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2003, the Suffolk County Department of Health Board of Review granted a variance request with conditions, under approval number c10-02- 0013; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2003, the Zoning Board of Appeals granted relief with conditions from Chapter 47, Section 47.3 A of the Code for a Special Exception to enclose a farm building with a floor area of 1,300 sq. ft., Application No. 5324; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2003, the Town Engineer reviewed the drainage calculations and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board on June 9, 2003, made a determination that the proposed site plan amendment work is a Type II Action and is not subject to review pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617.5; and WHEREAS, on June 19, 2003, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed and approved, with conditions, the proposed site plan application; and WHEREAS, on June 24, 2003, the Suffolk County Department of Public Works approved the proposed driveway, with no permit required; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2003, the Southold Fire District responded after review of the site plan and the Planning Board accepted the recommendations for approval; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 2003, the Southold Town Building Inspector certified the site plan; and WHEREAS, the applicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold another public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and rescind or amend its conditional approval; and WHEREAS, on August 11, 2003, the applicant signed a statement agreeing not to object to a new public hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and J�3 Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-One August 11, 2003 WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the site plan prepared by Samuels and Steelman, dated November 18, 2002 and last revised June 12, 2003, subject to fulfillment of the following condition. This condition must be met within six (6) months of the resolution: 1. Approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: 6:25 p.m. - Schneider, Ernest-This proposed minor subdivision is for 2 lots on 12.3 acres and a 1.2-acre lot line change with an existing lot. The property is located on the west side of Alvah's Lane, north of CR 48 in Cutchogue. SCTM#s1000-95-3-10 & 101-1-14.3 Any questions on this proposed subdivision? (There were no questions.) Any questions or comments'from the Board? (There were none.) I'll entertain a motion then to close the hearing. Mr. Edwards: So move. Mr. Cremers: Second. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. (The hearing was closed at 7:04 P.M.) What is the pleasure of the Board? Mr. Caggiano: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-Two August 11, 2003 WHEREAS, this proposal involves the subdividing of a 13.41 acre parcel (SCTM#1000- 101-1-14.3) into two lots, where Lot 1 equals 2.32 acres and Lot 2 equals 2.61 acres and through a lot line modification, enlarging Lot 1 (SCTM#1000-95-3-10) from 1.11 acres to 2.32 acres; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board granted conditional sketch plan approval on April 16, 2001; and WHEREAS, on April 16, 2001 the Planning Board ruled that the Negative Declaration previously issued for the identical action was still valid; and WHEREAS, the Cutchogue Fire District is not requiring a fire well for the proposed action as stated in an August 1, 2001 letter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has accepted the ruling with the following condition: At the time a new residence is constructed upon Lot 3, a fire well will be required and noted as such upon the final print & mylars and, further, a Covenant and Restriction shall be filed noting this condition; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 2001 a draft Covenant of Declarations was received by the Planning Board; and WHEREAS, on May 20, 2003 the Southold Town Board granted a waiver from the provisions of Local Law#3 of 2002 and Local Law#3 of 2003; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the maps, last revised March 27, 2002, subject to the following conditions. These conditions must be met within six (6) months of the resolution: 1. The Planning Board reviewed the park and playground requirement. As per Section 106-38 of the Subdivision Regulations, the amount to be deposited with the Town for park and playground services is now $5,000 per lot for each vacant lot in the subdivision. A Park and Playground Fee of$5,000 will be required prior to any endorsement of the subdivision by the Planning Board. 2. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval expired on March 21, 2003. Please submit three (3) mylar maps and five (5) paper copies with an updated Suffolk County Department of Health approval stamp. 3. The filing of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions with the County Clerk's Office prior to any endorsement of the final plat. A notation is to be placed on the final plat that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in accordance with the Planning Board's requirements. The notation is to include the liber and page number of the recorded document. Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-Three August 11, 2003 4. The referenced Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers upon the plat are incorrect. Please correct the plat to reference SCTM#1000-95-3-10 and 1000-101-1- 14.3. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Aves: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Hearings Held Over From Previous Meetings: Chairman Orlowski: Reflecting Nature Landscaping -This proposed site plan is to construct a 2,520 storage building and office in a contractor's yard on a 1.1 acre parcel. The property is located on the north side of CR 48, at 260 Cox's Neck Lane, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-113-14-10 I'll entertain a motion. Mr. Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following resolution: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby holds the public hearing for Reflecting Nature open. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Aye s: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: Perino, Joseph - This proposed major subdivision is for 7 lots on 20.8211 acres. The property is located on the south side of Main Road, 150' west of Sigsbee Road in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-122-7-9. This is still tied up in the moratorium. I'll entertain a motion to hold this hearing open. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-Four August 11, 2003 Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ******************** MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS, LOT LINE CHANGES AND SET- OFF APPLICATIONS Final Extensions: Chairman Orlowski: Niamonitakis -This proposed set-off is to set off a 1.253 acre lot from a 18.756 acre parcel; the proposed lot line change between M. Niamonitakis and R. Ross is to subtract 2.524 acres from the 18.756 acre parcel and to merge it with an existing 0.688 acre lot, resulting in one 3.212 acre lot and the remaining area which is part of the set-off application. SCTM#1000-31-6-28.1 & 29 Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, this proposed set-off is to set off a 1.253 acre lot from an 18.756 acre parcel; and WHEREAS, this proposed lot line change between M. Niamonitakis and R. Ross is to subtract 2.524 acres from the 18.756 acre parcel and to merge it with an existing 0.688 acre lot, resulting in one 3.212 acre lot and the remaining area which is part of the set- off application; and WHEREAS, the Development Rights will be purchased by the County on approximately 12.9 acres of the 18.756 acre lot; therefore BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Board grant a retroactive extension of conditional final approval effective from July 14, 2002 to December 14, 2003. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-Five August 11, 2003 Setting of Final Hearings: Chairman Orlowski: Nicokim - This proposed minor subdivision is for 3 lots on 27.2 acres located on Little Neck Road, 92.76' south of Eugene's Road, with 201.78' of frontage on Skunk Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-97-8-(31.2-31.4) Mr. Caggiano: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, this proposed subdivision is for three lots on 27.2 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, two of the lots are greater than 80,000 sq. ft. and the third is improved and contains an 80,095 sq. ft. building envelope exclusive of a larger lot from which 21.235 acres of Development Rights have been sold to the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS, the Suffolk County Department of Health issued a permit for the action on July 24, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Suffolk County Water Authority issued a letter of water availability on July 2, 2003; therefore be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, September 8, 2003, at 6:00 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps, dated as revised May 3, 2002. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ******************** MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS, LOT LINE CHANGES, SET-OFF APPLICATIONS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Lead Agency Coordination: Chairman Orlowski: Booth, Edward - This proposal is to set off a 2 acre lot from a 8.05 acre parcel. The property is located n/o Sound View Avenue, 1,669 feet e/o Lighthouse Road in Southold. SCTM#1000-50-2-15 Mr. Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following resolution: Southold Town Planning Board Page Twent�Six_ August 11, 2003 WHEREAS, this proposal is to set off a 2 acre clustered lot from an 8.05 acre parcel; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board start the SEAR lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********** Chairman Orlowski: Booth, Edward - This proposed set-off will set off a 2 acre lot (Lot 3)from a 28.36 acre parcel which includes a 2 acre building envelope (Lot 1). The proposed lot line change will transfer 43,590 sq. ft. from SCTM#1000-52-2-8 to SCTM#1000-52-2-7 in the R-80 Zoning District. The property is located n/o CR 27, w/o Mt. Beulah Avenue and s/o Sound View Avenue, in Southold. SCTM#1000-51-2-7 & 8 Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following: WHEREAS, this proposal will set off a 2 acre lot (Lot 3)from a 28.36 acre parcel which includes a 2 acre building envelope (Lot 1); and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to sell Development Rights upon 22.8647 acres of Lot 1; and WHEREAS, this proposal also includes a lot line change that will transfer 43,590 sq. ft. from SCTM#1000-52-2-8 (Lot 1) to SCTM#1000-52-2-7 (Lot 2) in the R-80 Zoning District; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board start the SEAR lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-Seven August 11, 2003 SITE PLANS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Lead Agency Coordination: Chairman Orlowski: Daffodils Country Store - This proposed site plan is for an alteration of an existing 5,093 sq. ft. building on a 0.935 acre parcel in the LB, A-C Zone(s), located at 832.77'west of Kenny's Road, CR 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s)1000- 59-9-30.4 Mr. Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following resolution: WHEREAS, the site plan is for an alteration of an existing 5,093 sq. ft. building on a 0.935 acre parcel in the LB & A-C Zone(s), located 832.77' west of Kenny's Road, CR 48 in Southold; and WHEREAS, a formal application for approval of this site plan was submitted on May 22, 2003; therefore BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board starts the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. ********************* APPROVAL OF PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Chairman Orlowski: Board to approve the minutes of July 14, 2003. Mr. Edwards: So move. Mr. Caggiano: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. /,5d Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty-Eight August 11, 2003 Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. There is nothing left on the agenda. If anybody has anything they want to add or say for the record, they can. If not, I'll entertain a motion to adjourn. (No one wished to be heard.) Mr. Caggiano: So move. Mr. Cremers: Second. Chairman Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Sidor. Chairman Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, � -ce-A Carol Kalin Barbara Rudder Bennett Or ows i, Jr., Chair an