The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRobalino Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Cantrell, Elizabeth Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2026 9:47 AM To: 'Karen Hoeg' Subject: Douglas P. Robalino Living Trust & Diane E. Robalino Living Trust; SCTM# 1000-31-9-21.1 Good Morning, This email is to follow up on our recent conversation regarding the Robalino Wetland Permit application. The office received your letter dated March 26, 2026 requesting this application be reopened during the next available public hearing meeting. The Board of Trustees and the Board's Legal Counsel determined that as per Chapter 275-8G of the Town Code, and for the fact that there has been no activity with this application since the June 11, 2025 public hearing this application has been deemed abandoned. In order to move forward with this project a new As-Built Wetland Permit application along with As-Built application fees will have to be submitted to this office. ECiza6eth Cantreff Administrative Assistant Town of Southold Board of Trustees Phone: (631) 765-1892 Fax: (631) 765-6641 i Joan U:NICUs ern �bk=4 a3tt6� S 631.727 2180 x331 JrncJivTwomey ntusuffolk III Iv.com i re<Ik; ....`;;" €i0u! March 26, 2026 Via Email 1 lizabeth.cantrGll(iPtown.soutliold.nv.us � Glen Goldsmith, President Board of Trustees "Town of Southold 1 i l Town Hall Annex iAi � 54375 Route 25, P.O. Box 1179 i Southold. NY 11971 Re Wetlands Permit Application —Proposed Modifications Douglas P. Robalino Lining Trust & Diane E. Robalino Living Trust, 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion, NY SCTM # 1000-31-9-21.1 Deal- President Goldsmith and Members of the Board of Trustees: This firm represents the Living Trusts of Douglas and Diane Robalino (the "Robalinos") in connection with the above referenced January 2024 application (the "2024 Application"). The subject property serves as a family retreat for them. It is not occupied full time. We write to request that this matter be scheduled for a continued public hearing, regarding the Robalinos' request for a wetlands permit. Previously this matter was before the Trustees at a hearing Meld on June 11, 2025 for a Wetlands Permit. At that hearing, two issues were raised. Both of those issues are addressed,and we believe, should now be considered resolved. Issue No. 1 - was the question of whether Coir Logs would be used instead of the submitted plan showing two tiers of 30"height structural retaining walls with native planting. Enclosed is a letter from .Jonathan Pactzel, a landscape architect, of Marshall Paetzel, dated.July 24, 2025, explaining why,in his opinion,Coir Logs would not be an effective replacement ofthe existing 4'-6' retaining wall which the Trustees had requested be removed. A copy of this letter is annexed hereto as Exhibit "A„ Issue No. 2 — was whether the Suffolk County Department of Health Services ("SCDFIS") had issued an approval of the Robalinos' existing septic system, for which plans had been submitted. Attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is a copy of-'a letter from SCDHS dated March 13, 2026, stating that the Robalinos' SCDIIS application is complete and ready for SCDTIS approval, except for a letter from the Trustees regarding the status of the Robalinos' wetlands permit. Also attached to l"xhibit "B" is a copy of"the New York Department of Environmental Conservation's better of "No Jurisdiction,"stating that the Robalinos' application"proposes no regulated activities within the boundary of state regulated freshwater wetlands and/or regulated adiacent areas. March 26,2026 Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is respectfully submitted that the Robalinos have undertaken to resolve the two remaining issues which the Trustees had raised at the last public hearing held in the matter of their Application; and respectfully request therefore, that an appropriate permit for their property be issued by the Trustees. Thank you for your attention to this matter,and should you have any questions,please contact the undersigned. VePe urs, Kar Enclosures(Exs.A&BI cc: Douglas&Diane Robalino > VII Robalinos' Letter, Exhibit "A" Letter of Marshall Paetzel, Landscape Architects, dated July 24, 2025 MAR f t .. ...r. �,p a<5s,+t I , $`N July 24, 2025 Town of Southold Trustees 54375 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Robalino Residence: 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion, NY 11939 To whom it may concern, I have been made aware that the Trustees have proposed that my client Doug Robalino consider replacing the existing concrete wall in disrepair with Coir Logs instead of the submitted plan showing proposed two tiers of 30" height structural retaining walls with native planting. In my experience, Coir Logs are most effectively used for erosion control, but a direct replacement of a 4'-6" height retaining wall does not seem like a case for Coir Logs at this site in my opinion. Guidelines for Coir Log use is to bury 2/3 in the ground and leave 1/3 above, making them inefficient for use as retaining in a narrow area. As the Coir Logs are biodegradable, they rely on establishing plant material between them before they biodegrade and are therefore normally spaced several feet apart with vegetation between them for long term stability through planting. In this case, the proposed two tiers of wall occupy five feet in width and have 3' between them for native vegetation. By using Coir Logs buried 2/3 in the soil, to achieve the amount of retention required to replace the existing wall height would require them to be installed so close together there would be little no room to plant vegetation between them to hold the slope once the Coir Logs break down leaving the hillside vulnerable to erosion. I ask that the Trustees reconsider the proposal to use Coir Logs to replace the existing wall and allow the two 30" structural walls with native plantings at the bottom, top and in between. I feel that for long term erosion control, these walls will be more reliable than biodegradable Coir Logs. My client understands that these walls will come at a significantly greater expense but is prioritizing what he and I feel is the most reliable and proven form of soil retention. Sincerely, ,• 1z , Jonathan Paetzel, RLA . .) .47 �4�3i`'�itq . .)f:: I 1952. - t>a,.':,,il e..i0 t t T�All THII,L P A A' 'I r N 55.47' R . R/CHT OF NAY "+ 20» E ` 83.00' S 4•. �; .z I, Aq hw fry J•� ggg 33 W oil $ 1 a �. OLMX W. MOUNRV PM raj '. i °Lr- A Jill DP ^ # aIf P — iN IN OISREVAIB V TOE 0 BANK nb nm LANDWARD UYR OF WETLANDSAll N F _ x s � f S 53.0925" yy' _.�..� r w 118.27' '> MARIDN LA K.ET HIM i a S �•',, ffigg it i o _t Robalinos' Letter, Exhibit "B" SCHDA Letter dated March 13, 2026 With the NY DEC's Letter of No Jurisdiction MAR t E COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 0 EDWARD P.ROMAINE SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES GREG'SON H.PIGOTT,MD,MPH Commhsicner Thomas Pellegrino March 13, 2026 460 HAWKINS AVENUE Notice#: 5 RONKONKOMA, NY 11779 ROBALINO RESIDENCE Tax Map: 1000031000900021001 Record ID: R 25-1436 Notice of Ing0m !p ete ARRIkation Thomas Pellegrino, This office has reviewed your application for the above referenced project.The following will be required prior to any further processing of the application for approval to construct: 1. It appears that the Town's letter of non jurisdiction for the wetlands expired in 2020. Please submit an updated letter To avoid delays In the processing/approval of your application, paperwork and documents should be submitted using the Online g2dai. Electronic submission will ensure priority processing. Please note that alterations of surveys/plans must be made by a licensed design professional or surveyor and be properly Certified. Photocopies of documents and penciled in corrections are not acceptable. Please do not hesitate to call (631) 852- 5700 with any questions. Regards, Edward Wozny Public Health Sanitarian CC: CHRISTOPHER LABATE DOUGLAS ROBALINO Ml A 5 , DIVISION f OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY-OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 360Yaphank Avenue,Suite 2C,Yaphank,NY 11980 ih�lrtt.sah (631)$52 57001 Fax(631)852-5755 Page 1 of 1 ., p8 KATHY= lronm Governor ove�� ConseiveMon AA�A Commissioner i.EFTON Commissioner LETTER OF NO JURISDICTION(Project)—FRESHWATER WETLANDS February 19,2026 Douglas Robalino 4 Stillwell Lane - Woodbury,NY 11798 • Re:DEC Freshwater VMands Project Jurisdictional Determination for Facility:Robalino Property Application* 1-4738-0509=0001 PA Address:1695 BayAvenue,East Marion,NY 11939 SCTM#. 100"1 9-21.001 Dear Douglas Robalino, After reviewing the wetland delineation and site-specific development plans"Robalino Property"prepared by Labcrew Engineering,P.C.,last dated 9/24/2025 you submitted for the above referenced parcel(s),the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation(DEC)has determined that: •The project proposes no regulated activities within the boundary of state regulated freshwater wetlands and/or regulated adjacent areas.Therefore,in accordance with Article 24 of the Environmental Conservation Law(ECL)and 6 NYCRR Part 663,no freshwater wetlands permit is required for the project,as proposed. This letter shall remain valid until 2/18/2031.After that date,the wetland boundary must be re-validated by DEC staff which may require modifications from the original flagged boundary if changes in wetland field conditions are observed.Any modifications may require a new survey to ensure jurisdictional wetlands and adjacent areas are accurately represented in relation to project plans. Pursuant to ECL section 24-0301(4),there is a rebuttable presumption that mapped and unmapped areas meeting the definition of a freshwater wetland are regulated and subject to permit requirements.Should the project plan you submitted as part of your request be altered,a new project jurisdictional determination may be needed to determine whether a permit is required.If you have questions regarding this determination,please email R1 BEH@dee.ny.gov. Please be advised that DEC has documented the summer occurrence of the Northern Long Eared Bat(NLEB)(Myods septenbionalls),a species listed as "endangered"by both New York State and the US Fish&Wildlife Service,within 3 Division of Fish and Wildlife I Bureau of Ecosystem Health I Region i 60 Circle Rd,Stony Brook NY 11790 1 www.dec.ny.gov I RIBEH@dec.ny.gov miles of the project location.We have determined that tree cutting at this location between March 1 and November 30 of any calendar year may result in the°take°of these endangeredAthnaated species or their habitat within the meaning of Environmental Conservation Law(ECL)§11-535.The term lake!'is defined in part as the direct Idlling or injury of individual members of a protected species,interference with critical breeding,foraging,migratory or other essential behaviors,or the adverse modification of the species'habitat.The lake"of a species listed as endangered or threatened Is prohibited in the absence of a permit from this Department issued pursuant to ECL§11-535. In order to avoid an Endangered Species"take",no tree cutting activities should be conducted at the project site between the dates of March 1 and November 30 of any calendar year. If you have questions about the presence of protected species on or near your propeft the potential effects of activities on these species,or your responsibilities as a landowner or project sponsor under the Endangered Species Regulations, please contact the Regional Wildlife Manager at(631)444-0310. Please note that this letter does not relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other agencies or municipalities. Sincerely, �Z�'� Kevin Kispert Permit Administrator cc.Labcrew Engineering BEH Wildlife File Division of Fish and YYIkliife I Bureau of Ecosystem Health I Region 1 50 Circle Rd,Stony Brack,NY 11790 1 www.doe.nygov I R7BEH@dec.ny.gov Board of Trustees 27 March 20, 2024 the ipe? s'' MR. L Yes, definitely. Is no reason to have it on It will_ be permane t. � TRUSTEE PEEP Okay, thank you. MR. LEON: Thank U. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Is here anyone else l ere who wishes to speak, or any other questions'�r comments,,-from the Board? (No response) . Hearing none, I make a motion o close the hearing. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second.. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All., n favor? (ALL AYES) . TRUSTEE PEEPLES: ake a motion to approvd his application with the con4ki n that the replacement of the apanese spurge is replaced ith native vegetation and that there ' s receipt of a planti plan indicating that, and that the PVC pi for drain e is permanently capped off. And subject to new plans de cting the foregoing. That is my motion. R. LEON: Yes, I will. Thank you. Thank you, very much. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: A1.1 in favor? (ALL AYES) . TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Number 9, James DeLuca, R.A. , LLC on behalf of DOUGLAS P. ROBAI NO LIVING TRUST & DIANE E. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST requests a Wetland Permit for the as-built 1, 628sq.ft. One-story dwelling with attached 186sq.ft. East side deck with steps and 405sq. ft. West side deck with steps; as-built 181sq. ft. PVC pergola; as-built 345sq. ft. West side concrete patio; 526sq.ft. Of as built concrete walkways; 827sq. ft. Of as-built step-stone walks; as-built 598sq.ft. Masonry block walk; as-built 1, 600sq.ft. Brick & asphalt driveway; existing previously permitted 1,380sq. ft. Two-story garage; and 10' diameter by 8 ` deep cesspool with shallow dome. Located: 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion. SCTM# 1000-31-9-21.1 The Trustees conducted a field inspection March 12th, 2024, noting there is a need to mitigate storm water runoff and its root cause. The patio, concrete slabs, turf and absence of vegetation to hold soil. Will review further at work session. The LWRP found this to be inconsistent. The inconsistencies are: The installation and upgrade to an IA/OWTS. The installation of a re-vegetation plan on the bank bluff. The removal of tires. A non-disturbance buffer was established by covenant in 2019 and it is shown on the survey. We need to verify that portions of the non-disturbance buffer were not cleared of vegetation. Aerial photos suggest that the area seaward of the concrete wall was cleared. Require a vegetated buffer designed to control erosion be installed from the seaward rear of the house. Require that the applicant remove all foreign debris seaward of the concrete retaining wall. Require that Board of Trustees 28 March 20, 2024 drainage on all impervious surfaces be installed. The Conservation Advisory Council resolved to not support the application. The Conservation Advisory Council does not support the application as submitted, and recommends an erosion control plan and installation of an IA septic system. The Conservation Advisory Council. recommends the applicant contact Cornell and obtain a list of appropriate plantings for the area. Is there anyone here wishing to speak regarding this application? MR. DELUCA: Yes. I'm Jim DeLuca, I'm the architect. I guess you know the history of this particular job. We originally came in for a -- we received a variance, we had the required permits, and during the construction phase, the contractor was working on the house, decided to take most of the house down and right down to the foundation. He rebuilt the house. And at that time, the Building Department actually worked with him, and they didn't put a stop work order on, they just let him continue. It' s in the same footprint. It's in the same design that I did originally on the renovation of it. The decks were permitted at that time. They were installed accordingly, same with the garage was installed accordingly, with the submitted plans. Since then, the owner put in other impervious surfaces, which are noted on the plan. I know as a fact, I was on the job originally, the property would be south of that retaining wall. It was not disturbed by the owner when he bought the house. That's exactly where it was. And I can testify to that because I originally did the as-built drawing measurement and all the rest of that stuff. I mean, I'm not saying to negate what you are suggesting, I'm only telling you what existed. Also the septic system had a pool and he replaced that particular pool. It' s almost in the same area. As far as the garage goes, that was built exactly the way it was permitted. The decks were constructed as exactly as they were on the construction drawings. What was added afterwards, as I said before, is the driveway, the pergola, and those are the only, and some of the walks. But realistically, the biggest change was the house was rebuilt, but in the same exact location, to the same specifications that the drawings were originally done, and the same with the garage. But the Building Department let the owner continue, and I was at a conversation riot long ago with the Building inspector and the owner, and he said he would accept the buildings the way they are, and there, you can see it, and the septic tank the way it's installed, or the drainage, the ring, actually, and give him a CO if you people accepted it. He was willing to accept it. I think the problem here with this whole job is the Building Department let him continue and didn't give him a stop Board of Trustees 29 March 20, 2024 work order when they saw the house was taken down, and they just let him finish the house. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: So, I can't speak on behalf of the Building Department. You know, this is kind of a prime example of why it a house is going to be a demo, we need to address some of the issues and not just put it back the way it was. As you, I don't know if you've been to the property, but there is a severe erosion issue going into Marion Lake, which is a very sensitive water body. There is old cracked-concrete foundation with new pilings on top of it, acting as a waterfall. There is a lot of impervious surfaces that was added to the rear of the property -- MR. DELUCA: I 'm aware of that. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: (Continuing) and the side of the property, which again, all ended up in Marion Lake. An IA septic system would have been a requirement had. this Board had a say when it was getting demoed. The setback would have been changed if it was a demo and came the right way. So there is a lot of mitigating steps that we would have taken to protect the environment, protect the bank and protect Marion Lake, that we did not get, because this was, you know, built without a permit. So now we have the tough task of trying to bless something that we would not have blessed had it gone through the proper channels. MR. DELUCA: I understand. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: So, you know, we have discussed, at minimum, removal of the concrete in the rear yard and the side yard; doing some sort of drainage to control any of the runoff that is going down the bank; add vegetat-ion; removal of all the tires and garbage and the junk that is on that, as well as require an IA/OWTS as the LWRP stated and the Conservation Advisory Council stated. You know, we are in a very tough position with this. And, you know. Is there anyone else here wishing to speak regarding this application? MR. ROBALINO: Douglas Robalino, I'm the homeowner. I have no problem with rebuilding the whole back wall. I want to finish the project. I wanted to add it to this application and the Building Department said no, it is too complicated, we need to get done with the house first. Then you can go forward. I have all intentions. And if you want to add it to this one, I wanted to do that to begin with. They didn't want me to. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: No, I don' t think the old concrete retaining wall was what we are talking about. We are talking about everything on the house. There's concrete patio, deck, whatever you want to call it, that is on the rear of the yard, as well as the side yard. I believe we have pictures in the file. MR. ROBALINO: Behind the retaining wall with the tires. Is that what you are referring to? TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: We're talking landward of the retaining wall. Board of Trustees 30 March 20, 2024 So there is your retaining wall. Right there. So we have all that concrete structure where we have footings placed on concrete structure that is cracked and leaning down the bank, and that concrete wraps all.. the way to the western side of the house. So obviously it's impervious surface literally on the bank/bluff, and you are getting a severe erosion issue that will only get worse, and at some point those concrete slabs are going, and your house is going to go with it, the way it's currently situated. MR. ROBALINO: That was all part of the existing. But again, I 'll incorporate all of that with the rebuilding of the retaining wall. I have no problem with that. I want to do that work. We'll take it from that point all the way forward. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: So we are not talking about the retaining wall. That's not on these plan. MR. ROBALINO: Back to where you are talking about. I have no problem incorporating that into what we do. Obviously I have to rebuild that retaining wall and remove those tires, and we'll incorporate all of that to it. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: So what we were discussing is, you know, since the retaining wall and everything is not part of this particular application, as we've stated, we do need to come up with some sort of solution for the runoff into Marion Lake. Potentially a rebuilt retaining wall and/or terracing, and/or vegetation will be part of that erosion control project, whatever that may be, since it's not in front of us currently. What is in front of us currently is this as-built house which we need to address. So the impervious surface like this, the impervious surface that was in the previous picture, that is the kind of stuff that we immediately have to take care of. And then as part of that, you can potential go to the Building Department, re-apply and come back to us for a retaining wall., a terracing, some sort of other project to address the erosion issue. MR. ROBALINO: Do we add that to this existing application or come back here with a separate application? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Yes. MR. ROBALINO: So table it tonight, add it to this existing one? I have no problem with that. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Is there anyone else here wishing to speak regarding this application? MR. DELUCA: I just wanted to, the first, that patio that is going there, that concrete was added, but the concrete walk around and the concrete that is under the decks was, right there, right from the original. We didn't add, they didn't enlarge it, he didn't take it out. And we designed it so not to disturb it, we rested some of the deck supports on top of that existing walks. So they were all there. The only one that I know of that' s new concrete is that one that you are looking at right now. All the rest of them were pre-existing. And they were on. Board of Trustees 31 March 20, 2024 And if you pull out the survey, when I originally submitted the application, you'll see them on there. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We are not saying they were not on there, sir. I mean certainly this one, the biggest one, was not on there. But -- one second, sir. So on the south side of the structure, that walkway was there. But everything has changed now. It' s a new house. If we were going to do a new house, we would have pulled those out. MR. DELUCA: Okay. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: And not to mention the erosion there has gotten -- I was there originally. And the erosion has gotten much worse. The situation is completely changed now. So where we might have made concessions to say, okay, this is a minor project, they are keeping this walkway. It' s not ideal., but let's try to work with a planting plan around it. Now it' s a problem. Now we are out here in 2024 and it' s a problem. So unfortunately we were both there originally and know what was said and know how we made advisement there, so. Thank you. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Is there anyone else here wishing to speak regarding this application? (No response) . Or any further comments from the Board? (Negative response) . In light of the conversations that we have had, I think it would be best to table this application to address the issues that we spoke about; in particular, removal of the concrete on the seaward side of the house, on the south side of the house; come up with some drainage plan, whether it' s a trench drain to drywells, whatever the case may be; to address that erosion control; potentially talk about adding that retaining wall or rehabilitation of that retaining wall to also address that erosion issue; the installation of an IA/OWTS system; and a planting plan for that bank area. MR. DELUCA: I agree with everything except the AI system. The Building Department, because it went in as a renovation, I did not add any other square footage. It's exactly the same. I didn't add a bedroom, a kitchen another bathroom. It' s one bathroom. They are willing to accept what I have now. And as long as we agree on that, I could go forward with everything else. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: So that's the Building Department. As I said, we are a separate Board, and if we ever went through the proper steps for this, that 100% would have been a condition on what was built. As you can see, the LWRP said it, the Conservation Advisory Council said it, and this Board said it as well. You are in a very environmentally sensitive area right there by Marion Lake, and with the amount of work that was done on this property, I think at minimum, you know, doing the Board of Trustees 32 March 20, 2024 changes we talked about, as well as an IA/OWTS, I think you are getting off pretty easy, personally. But that' s just my opinion. MR. ROBALINO: Okay, so we'll table it tonight and work on the back. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Yes, sir. MR. ROBALINO: Okay. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: I'll make a motion to table this application. MR. ROBALINO: Thank you. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES) . TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Number 10, Jeffrey Patanjo on behalf of STEVE PLITAS requests a Wetland Permit to remove and replace 54 li ar f et of deteriorated timber bulkhead with new vinyl bulkhe in sam location as existing and raised height of 12" above existing top cap elevation; provide 10 cubic yards of can sand fill be ind bulkhead; and to establish and perpetual maintain a 10' wi non-turf buffer along the landward edge f all of the new and ex ting bulkhead. Located: 31 Oaklawn Avenue, Southold, SCTM# 000-70-6-8 The Trus ees most recently visited the s' .e on the 12th of March, noted: dvise not to raise the bulk ..ad so it can conform to the e isting bulkhead that has beady been rebuilt, and therefore, it would not need the fil . The LWRP coor 'nator found this t be consistent. And the Conser tion Advisory C ncil .resolved to support the application with he ten-foot ffer planted with native vegetation. Is there anyone he to sp ak regarding this application? MR. PATANJO: Jeff Patanjo, on ehalf of the applicant. On the comment about r sing the bulkhead height, I do have on the plan to raise it a axi m of one-foot in height above the existing. The intention of th roject is to raise it as needed to match the height as the pr iously installed vinyl bulkhead on the proje t that was done p obably by me two years ago. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI : it does already matched fight now. MR. PATANJO: The the intent is to keep it at he existing height, no rai e in height, of the proposed bul ead. TRUSTEE KUP I: Thank you. Is there anyone else ere that wishes t s eak regarding this application? (No resp se) . Any mem rs of the Board? (Negative response) . Hearing none, I make a motion to close the hearing. TR TEE PEEPLES: Second. . USTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES) . TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I make a motion to approve this application Board of Trustees 30 June 11, 2025 �Mxone else wish to speak regarding t application? (No resp'r' e) . Hearing no father comment, I makes motion to close the hearing. �� TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: S ond. , - TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Al in favor? (ALL AYES) TRUSTEE SEPENOSKc : I make a Tfottion to approve the application with plansepi.cti.ng a 25-foot fr�-disturbance buffer, and retaining, rees. That's my motion. TRUST PEEPLES: Second. TRU EE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? �LL AYES) . /MR. COSTELLO: Thank you. TRUSTEE SEPFNOSKI' Thane _yo Good night. _ TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Number 7, Karen Hoeg, Esq. on behalf of DOUGLAS P. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST & DIANE E. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST requests a Wetland Permit for the as-built 1, 628sq. ft. One-story dwelling with attached 186sq. ft. East side deck with steps and 405sq.ft. West side deck with steps; as-built 181sq. ft. PVC pergola; as-built 345sq. ft. West side concrete patio; 526sq.ft. Of as built concrete walkways; 827sq. ft. Of as-built step-stone walks; as-built 598sq. ft. Masonry block walk; as-built 1, 600sq.ft. Brick & asphalt driveway; existing previously permitted 1, 380sq.ft. Two-story garage; and 10' diameter by 8' deep cesspool with shallow dome; remove the existing seaward masonry wall and replace with two tiers of 30" high masonry walls with 36" between the walls and a drain system, to be planted with native grasses; all debris, including tires and trash to be removed from the bank face by hand and place native seed mix in areas of exposed soil; establish and perpetually maintain a 30' wide Non-Disturbance Buffer along the landward edge of wetlands, and establish and perpetually maintain a 1, 978sq. ft. Vegetated Non-Turf Buffer on the east side of dwelling wrapping around seaward side of dwelling, and within the area of the retaining walls; remove existing concrete pad seaward of dwelling and install a t4 . 6' wide pervious gravel walk. Located: 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion. SCTM# 1000-31-9--21.1 The Trustees most recently conducted an inhouse review on June 3rd, 2025, and most recently visited the site on March 12th, 2024, noting a need to mitigate stormwater runoff and its root cause, which is the patio, concrete slabs, turf and absence of vegetation to hold soil, and we would review further at work session. The LWRP reviewed this application and found it to be inconsistent. The inconsistencies include the installation and an upgrade of an IA/OWTS, which is recommended; the installation of a re-vegetation plan on the blank/bluff; the removal of Board of Trustees 31 June 11, 2025 tires; a non-disturbance buffer was established by covenant in 2019 and is shown on the survey; and the aerial photo suggests that the area seaward of the concrete wall was cleared; they also noted to require a vegetated buffer design to control erosion to be installed from the seaward rear of the house; and require the applicant to remove all foreign debris; and require that drainage on all impervious surfaces is installed. The CAC also reviewed this application and did not support it. They recommended that the applicant contact Cornell and obtain a list of appropriate plantings for the area. I 'm in receipt of a new plan received in April of 2025. Is there anyone here wishing to speak regarding this application? MS. MCGIVERN: Joan McGivern, from Twomey Latham, on behalf of Karen Hoeg. The revised landscape plan is as written. I 'm happy to review it with you. The landscape plan proposes to remove the masonry wall, which is in disrepair, and replace it with two tiers of 30-inchh masonry walls, with 36 inches between the walls, planted with native grasses. All the debris, including tires and trash, will be removed from the non-disturbance buffer by hand, and native seed mix will be placed in the areas of exposed soil. And it's also proposed that a 1, 978 square foot vegetated non-turf buffer be proposed on the garage side of the house, and that concrete pad which is at the rear of the house will be removed and replaced with pervious gravel. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: So when you say the rear of the house, are you referring to the seaward side or the landward side? MS. MCGIVERN: I'll orient myself here. I believe it's the seaward side of the house. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Okay, so we did review these plans during our work session, and we had also met with the applicant in the field to discuss some of the changes that we would need to see to consider this application, and unfortunately we are not seeing a lot of the recommendations that we made in the field, including the concrete walkway which is on the side of the house, and the concrete pad underneath the wood deck, which are both significantly contributing to the runoff issues of the property. MS. MCGIVERN: The concrete deck, in order to hold it up, it's on concrete. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: And the reason that they need the concrete is because of the extreme erosion that is happening on this property; is that correct? MS. MCGIVERN: I can't speak to that. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Okay, well, having been in the field, I can speak to it. And I would say it more points to the instability of this area which has been caused by the concrete that is so close to the top of this bank. So if you note on the plans that you're looking at here, Board of Trustees 32 June 11, 2025 the top of bank line goes through that concrete, which is underneath the wood deck. MS. MCGIVERN: Well, if the wooden deck was shortened, would that help? TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: I believe that would help. There would also have to be significant removal of the structure in this area, because all of the concrete, especially on the side of the house here which was added without permit. (After a brief pause, presentation continues as follows) . TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: (Continuing) . So we did review with the applicant in the field the concrete walkway, which was added without permit, on the side of the house, would have to be removed as a part of this application. MS. MCGIVERN: I thought that that was our suggestion was to remove it and replace it with pervious gravel. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: So it was unclear to us on the plans. It appears on the plans that only one section of the concrete was to be replaced with pervious gravel. And that looks like the section that is facing the water. We would just want to see that consistent with the side of the house as well. And additionally -- MS. MCGIVERN: I'm sorry, the concrete that there -- TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Maybe it's better if we speak directionally. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Are you talking about the concrete on the west side of the house? TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Yes. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Which is the large concrete patio with significant runoff issues on the west side, adjacent to Bay Avenue MS. MCGIVERN: There' s a wood deck with the chimney, and you're talking about the concrete walkway there? TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Yes. MS. MCGIVERN: Okay. That also is to be replaced with pervious gravel? TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: I believe what we discussed in the field was re-vegetating that area to help with the excessive runoff that is occurring all over this property. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: So we had previous discussions about this property, both at the location and during public hearings, and the problem that we ran into was the concrete structures were built without a permit, as was the house rebuilt without a permit right adjacent to the top of the bank of Marion Lake. MS. MCGIVERN: Right. But they did have two ZBA approvals. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: If they come in for a permit, we would have asked them to move that house further away from the bank so that we didn't run into these problems, which is what we discussed previously. So basically we are dealing with a self-imposed hardship where they built things without permits and now they're coming to us to try to fix the problem that they created. MS. MCGIVERN: Well, we are trying to work with the Board to fix Board of Trustees 33 June 11, 2025 the problem. I'm just trying to understand, first we were talking about the smaller wood deck that intersects with the top of the bank, so I suggested maybe if we narrow that deck, would that solve the problem so that it's not running into the top of the bank. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Yeah, and going back to our previous hearing, that was one of the things that we discussed, removal of the concrete both on the seaward side and the western side, adding vegetation to address any runoff concerns, potentially dialing that deck back to bring it back further from the top of the bank, doing a restoration of the bank that includes removal of the tires and debris and the old retaining wall. MS. MCGIVERN: Right. We've already proposed that, so I'm just trying to -- we, as part of the plan, um, in letter dated April 8th, we proposed to remove the tires and debris by hand and seed it. So I'm trying to narrow down the to-do list here. So is that acceptable -- TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Yes, ma'am. MS. MCGIVERN: Then we can check it off. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: You've checked off some of the boxes we previously discussed. MS. MCGIVERN: So I 'm trying to figure out what boxes have I not checked off. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Removal of concrete throughout, both on the seaward side and the western side. MS. MCGIVERN: So what we already proposed on the seaward side to replace that with a pervious walkway, is it possible to remove a lot of the concrete walkway but have at least a pervious walkway among the re-veg? I mean, you need a place to walk without disturbing the vegetation. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: There is a large wood deck that you've noted on the side of the house. So I don't see the need for a walkway outside of that. MS. MCGIVERN: I believe they would like a walkway, a pervious walkway on the ground. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Okay, limited to four-feet in width, is our typical walkway. MS. MCGIVERN: Yes. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: So as it exists right now, I think it's a four or five-foot cement walkway. I think the Board would want to see a vegetated area with small treads through that area, that, you know, when you had a major rain event, the rain would hit, you know, bluestone tread, or something to that effect, and immediately go to the side. And, you know, with large spacing. This would not be a high-traffic area MS. MCGIVERN: No, but they wanted some ability to walk, so I think we can work with that, and -- TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Additionally, we had discussed in our work session, the remedy here, the proposal of adding two tiers of Board of Trustees 34 June 11, 2025 masonry walls. MS. MCGIVERN: Which we have in the plan. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: I'm not sure the Board is open to adding that much structure at this point. We had discussed in our work session, the idea of adding coir logs and plantings this entire bank to try to re-vegetate. MS. MCGIVERN: Well, the concern is that the coir logs would not hold. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Why not? MS. MCGIVERN: It was recommended that we do masonry walls, maybe along the lines of an earlier application of stack stone. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I don't fully see the need for it at this site. I mean I guess we can look at it, something along the base, and then coir logs and plantings up from there. You know, something very minor. MS. MCGIVERN: So have one of them be masonry and one be coir logs? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Again, I 'm not entirely sure there is a need for it at this site. But especially with the removal of the cement waterfall at the top of the bank. I think that and some plantings would go a long way. And one thing that the DEC gets right is when people come forward with an application, they start with the least invasive version of that application possible. So, you know, in some cases the beginning stage is plantings, and then the next stage would be coir logs and plantings, and then the next stage after that would be spread-out rocks, and then the next stage after that would be, you know, rocks packed tightly together to form sort of a revetment. MS. MCGIVERN: Yeah, we just going with what the landscape architect recommended as the most durable. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Sure. MS. MCGIVERN: We can take back the idea of coir logs but, um -- TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Often times landscape architects are looking at things with a different lens than we are, and, you know, it's really the job of this Board to balance the property use with the environmental aspects. And usually a landscape architect is looking at more use and long-term durability, and also the easy answer. Because it's simple to go in there and put in two walls and walk away forever. But if we did that all over the place it would mirror Queens, so we are trying to avoid that. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: It's also worth looking at the aerial photographs. The adjacent properties are treed, they are vegetated. The property that we are currently discussing is an open-to-the-sky turf sod lawn, with hardships created by the illegal construction. So we are trying to -- MS. MCGIVERN: Yeah, and we understand that. It's been pending for so long that he's been reluctant to do anything proactive until he gets a clear green light from you. Board of Trustees 35 June 11, 2025 MS. HULSE: What's been pending? I'm sorry, if I could just interrupt. What's been pending? MS. MCGIVERN: This application. MS. HULSE: Isn't this the application where your client worked through numerous stop-work orders, when the Building Department continued to work, and just came in with photos after the fact? I 'm just curious, are you in a position right now to be certified by the Building Department? MS. MCGIVERN: Um, I can't speak to that, but I believe we have two ZBA approvals already. It was as-built work. MS. HULSE: So if this Board is of the mind to approve something, it would have to be conditioned upon that. Because the permit here is secondary to that. So -- MS. MCGIVERN: Yes. Of course. Of course. MS. HULSE: So that' s the history here. So this Board has not been delaying it. In fact it' s -- MS. MCGIVERN: No, he's reluctant to move forward until he gets a total green light. I'm not making excuses, I 'm just communicating what the client' s position has been. MS. HULSE: Okay. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Is there a proposal -- does the property have an AI system during reconstruction of the -- MS. MCGIVERN: This was approved in 2017 when the construction occurred, which was pre-IA. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Thank you. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: So, just to clarify, the whole house was permitted in 2017? TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Not by this Board. MS. MCGIVERN: No, not by this Board. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Because Trustee Krupski and I were on that Board, and what was permitted at that time was a rebuild of the deck, and now we are here because we have a whole rebuild of the house, without any approval, without any permits. MS. MCGIVERN: I believe there is a seven-page letter in the file, and what happened is they had sought to reconstruct part of the house, and when the contractor got involved, um, he ended up taking down the whole house because of rot. So anyway, there is a long history here, and we are where we are, and I'm trying to move forward with getting this wetlands permit. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Just to clarify, though, for the record, because, you know, several members of this Board were here eight years ago and made it very clear to your client in the field about what he needed to do moving forward, and that if it became a demolition, it was going to have to conform. And now we are sort of here, and the frustrating part, sort of starting from scratch, after many, many meetings and site visits. So, yes, I understand that you may be here in good faith to correct something, but there was no confusion eight years ago, Board of Trustees 36 June 11, 2025 and this would be the first extension of good faith then starting new here, but there is too much history to just act like there' s not, I guess, for lack of better words. MS. MCGIVERN: No, I understand, but -- TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: I also want to note that these plans were stamped received April llth, 2025 in our office. So I don't believe we have been delaying anything. We have spoken directly with the client to explain exactly what is needed, and unfortunately a lot of the recommended changes are not reflected in the plans we received in April. MS. MCGIVERN: So I'm trying to work with you, and I suggest that on the smaller deck, that we move it back to the top of the bank and remove as much concrete as possible. With respect to the concrete walkway, on the western side, that that be replaced with bluestone treads. And re-vegetate, otherwise re-vegetated. And with respect to the masonry walls, we can take up whether coir logs could be used instead. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: And additionally we are require an IA system be added to this property, so. MS. MCGIVERN: And that is not acceptable to my client, and I'm not sure it's within your jurisdiction. MS. HULSE: That's one way to approach it. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: That is one way to approach it. And it's not really you who gets to make that call, so. MS. MCGIVERN: And we understand that. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Right. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Just to reiterate, we were not the ones -- MS. MCGIVERN: And there is a seven-page letter in the file addressing this exact issue. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We've reviewed the file. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: And we had this conversation with your client however many months, a year ago, and the problem was he didn't like what we had to say, so he didn't do it. So there was no delay on our part. It was his reluctance to do what we had asked him to do to correct the self-imposed hardship that he created by doing this without a permit. Obviously, if we work with people, we could address all these concerns prior to construction. Now you are here looking for a fix for something that he created himself. MS. MCGIVERN: Yeah, but it would be extremely costly for him to put in an IA system now. He would basically have to tear up the whole front of his house. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: And it would be costly to rebuild the whole house as well. MS. MCGIVERN: Yes. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: So, we have the benefit tonight of a very crowded hearing, and lots of people in here who all have had to play by the rules and have to do an IA system when .rebuilding a house. So for us to look the other way because the client has already rebuilt the house would be incredibly unfair to Board of Trustees 37 June 11, 2025 everybody else in Southold Town. MS. MCGIVERN: But it was approved by the ZBA back in 2019. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Was it approved by the Trustees? TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: There is a lot of confusion around ZBA approvals and the Trustees approvals. We are separate Board with different portions of the code to consider, as I 'm sure you're aware. I think you have some notes to consider with your client from this evening, and we look forward to a new project. MS. MCGIVERN: Well, if I make the three modifications that we seem to have reached at least a consensus, that that would be acceptable to the Board, are you saying that notwithstanding those modifications, you would still deny this application because -- TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: We would be happy to review new plans with the changes depicted, and then we would review them and we would come back here. That' s how the process works. We can't verbally -- MS. HULSE: We can't give a prospective decision at this point. MS. MCGIVERN: Well, this very evening I've heard you approve things subject to receiving the modifications discussed. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: They were minor in nature. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: A three-foot wall to a two-foot wall is a lot different than an as-built house. MS. MCGIVERN: Well, I have two masonry walls were suggested -- TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: It's not something we would be willing to consider approving an application subject to new plans in this case because the changes are so dramatic that we would need to review new plans. Is there anyone else here wishing to speak regarding this application? MS. HULSE: May I just inquire, have you gotten Suffolk County Health Department approval? MS. MCGIVERN: That' s my understanding, yes. That is my understanding. MS. HULSE: Okay. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Any other questions or comments from Board? (No response) . Hearing none, I make a motion to table this application for submission of new plans for review. MS. MCGIVERN: Thank you. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL YES) . TRUSTEE PE�?I�E_S: Number 8, JUSTIN CONCANNO is a Wetland Permit to instal new driveway/ping area at front (east side) of dwelling; rem sting west side driveway; install wooden fencing in s ' and ba rds; install three (3) timber retaining wa consisting of: North to be 64.8 ' long by 2 ' high Wall to be 30. 6' long by 2' high, d South Wall to rr z Glenn Goldsmith,President � D��FF�CkcDG Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski, Vice President �'`� �, 54375 Route 25 Eric Sepenoski cn P.O. Box 1179 Liz Gillooly Southold,NY 11971 Elizabeth Peeples i01 � ,�° Telephone(631)765-1892 cam' Fax(631)765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection Report Date/Time: /3/2`, Completed infield by: G . JA ,'<,*"-' '-, Karen Hoeg, Esq. on behalf of DOUGLAS P. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST & DIANE E. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST requests a Wetland Permit for the as-built 1,628sq.ft. one- story dwelling with attached 186sq.ft. east side deck with steps and 405sq.ft. west side deck with steps; as-built 181sq.ft. PVC pergola; as-built 345sq.ft. west side concrete patio; 526sq.ft. of as built concrete walkways; 827sq.ft. of as-built step-stone walks; as- built 598sq.ft. masonry block walk; as-built 1,600sq.ft. brick & asphalt driveway; existing previously permitted 1,380sq.ft. two-story garage; and 10' diameter by 8' deep cesspool with shallow dome; remove the existing seaward masonry wall and replace with two tiers of 30" high masonry walls with 36" between the walls and a drain system, to be planted with native grasses; all debris, including tires and trash to be removed from the bank face by hand and place native seed mix in areas of exposed soil; establish and perpetually maintain a 30' wide Non-Disturbance Buffer along the landward edge of wetlands, and establish and perpetually maintain a 1,978sq.ft. vegetated Non-Turf Buffer on the east side of dwelling wrapping around seaward side of dwelling, and within the area of the retaining walls; remove existing concrete pad seaward of dwelling and install a ±4.6' wide pervious gravel walk. Located: 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion. SCTM# 1000-31-9-21.1 Type of area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland /Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: °/ Chapt. 275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes No Not Applicable Info needed/Modifications/Conditions/Etc.: ¢ a ,a]. ems_ { � ® a} '\_B;°�! Q V'8 �e 0 9 f�'!P 1 "'b'' Qt� ' 'Y'A V4A Present Were: ~�G. G,pldsmith N. Kr�rpski —,,/E. Sepenoski L. Gillooly �° E. Peeples r.- Karen A.Hoeg '/� Latham Partner 69 Twome [//� khoeeg27@suff x2aykhoeg@suffolklaw.com SHEA, KELLEY, DUBIN & QUARTARARO, LLP 33 West Second St. P.O.Box 9398 Riverhead,NY 1]901 April 8, 2025 D C E 11/1 2 BY HAND DELIVERY AN 1 1 Glenn Goldsmith, President Southold Town Board of Trustees, Town of Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re Freshwater Wetland Permit Application—Proposed Modifications Douglas P. Robalino Living Trust& Diane E. Robalino Living Trust, 1695 Bay Avenue,East Marion,NY, SCTM# 1000-31-9-21.1 Dear President Goldsmith and Members of the Board of Trustees: This firm represents the Living Trusts of Douglas and Diane Robalino (the "Applicants") in connection with the above referenced 2024 application. The matter was last before the Trustees of March 20, 2024 and we last corresponded with the Board on October 23, 2024. In the Field Inspection Report dated May 7, 2024, the Trustees listed "non-turf buffers" wherever possible and to address drainage with native planting. Over the past few months, the Applicant has been working with Marshall Paetzel to develop a landscape design which we believe addresses the Trustees' comments. In this regard, enclosed please find three (3) sets of the Revegetation Plan as prepared by Marshall Paetzel Landscape Architecture dated April 3, 2025. The landscape plan proposes removal of the masonry wall in disrepair and replacement with two tiers of 30" masonry walls proposed with 36" between the walls planted with native grasses. All debris, including tires and trash,will be removed from the non-disturbance buffer by hand and native seed mix will be placed in areas of exposed soil. A 1978 sf vegetated non turf buffer is proposed on the garage side of the house and a concrete pad at the rear of the house will be removed and replaced with pervious gravel. a f J April 8, 2025 Page 2 of 2 Applicants reiterate their request for issuance of a permit so that a Certificate of Occupancy can issue. Should the Board have any questions,please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, 4en KH:dp Encls. -D � � � � � � APR 1 1 2025 Southold Town Board of Trustees AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) I/We, Douglas Robalino and Diane Robalino owners of the property identified as SCTM# 1000- 31-9-21.1 in the town of Southold .New York,hereby authorizes Twomey, Latham, Shea.,_ Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, LLP to act as any agent and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s)from the Southold Town and of Trustees for this property. Douglas P. Robalino Living Tr t Diane E. Robalino Living Trust xl� By- ,,, By: J"I'L1,5�____ Property Owner's Signature Property Owfier's Signature Douglas P. Robalino, Trustee Diane E. Robalino, Trustee SWORN To BEFORF,MF,THIS DAY OF 20 25 7-- --2,z Z Notary Public SUSAN M CURRY wormy PuBuc,sTATE OF NEw YORIL Re&tmdon No.OICU6017899 M yC: MYDRIL] F6017899 1C.STATE m No.0 1 Qudified in Namsmmp, my Commission ExpiM mC card of Trustees Applicati PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS APPLICATION NAME & SCTM#: NAME: ADDRESS: l7 �� Gem 31 , g- .S STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK residing at being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of , 20 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office located at , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Signature Sworn to before me this Day of ; 20 Notary Public Glenn Goldsmith,President Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President ',�4 �y,„'{, 54375 Route 25 Eric Sepenoskit x s P.O. Box 1179 Liz Gillooly Southold,NY 11971 Elizabeth Peeples 01 �ap�,'' Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD g` ' JUN 1 1 P09� BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD i ~"- sautl;rdd 4Mr; ----------------------------------------------- ------------- In the Matter of the Application of DOUGLAS P. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST& DIANE E. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK AFJF'IDAVIT OF POSTING DO NOT COMPLETE THIS FORM UNTIL THE POSTING HAS REMAINED IN PLACE FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DA YS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE— COMPLETE THIS FORM ON EIGHTH DA Y OR LATER I, Karen Hoeg, Esq. residing at/dba 33 West 2nd Street, Riverhead, NY 11901 being duly sworn,depose and say: That on the 2nd day of J u ne ,.2025 ,1 personally posted the property known as 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion, NY by placing the Board of Trustees official noticing poster where it can easily be seen from the street, and that I.have checked to be sure the noticing poster has remained in place for a full seven days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday,June 11, 2025. Dated: atne r gnature) Sworn to before me this (( day of 2025 Notary Public DONNRALOUNi NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YOM Regtstratlon No.01BL6390057 Oml;fwd h Suffolk Gn" My Oxmnloslan EV4nApti 22,20.1 Karen A.Meg P.rincr 631.727.2180 x269 Twomey a U#harn khoeg�a)sufk'olklaw.eom\.1 eti(Sei imd t. P.O. Hav 9-"Q8 Rivcnccad,NY I i 901 June 5, 2025 BY HAND DELIVERY 4 yU N 2025 Y Elizabeth Cantrell, Administrative Assistant Town of Southold Southold own Town Hall Annex Board of Tr��7te.c` 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re Freshwater Wetland Permit Application—Proposed Modifications Douglas P. Robalino Living Trust& Diane E. Robalino Living Trust, 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion, NY, SCTM# 1000-31-9-21.1 Dear Elizabeth: Enclosed please find the original Agent Authorization form authorizing Twomey, Latham, Shea, et. al. to act as agent on behalf of the subject application. Also enclosed is the original proof of mailing notice and certified mail receipts. We will submit all green cards and the Affidavit of Posting at the hearing. Very truly yours, r a� KH:dp Encls. AUTHORIZATION ORIGINAL (Where the applicant is not the owner) I/We, Douglas Robalino and Diane Robalino owners of the property identified as SCTM# 1000- 31-9-21.1 in the town of Southold ,New York,hereby authorizes Twomey, Latham, Shea Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, LLP to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permits)from the Southold Town Board of Trustees for this property. Douglas P. Robalino Living Tr t Diane E. Robalino Living Tr st BY' BY' Property Owner's Signature Property Owner's Signature Douglas P. Robalino, Trustee Diane E. Robalino, Trustee SWORN To BEFORF,MF,THIS ___DAY OF 20 25 Notary Public SUSAN M CURRY P 0 2 VOTARy PUBLIC,STATIE70F NEW YORX I CL U 01 Registmdon Nm OICU60178M t QuIlfiedin iN My Coma-dwsion Expires Board of Trustees Application PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS APPLICATION NAME & SCTM#: 1660. NAME: i 5 � PKA S SEE ATTACHED 3 t { I gj g J STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Diane Wassick , residing at 33 West 2nd Street, Riverhead NY 11901 , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 3rd day of June 12025 , deponent mailed a true dopy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names;that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office located at Riverhead , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Signature Jacqueline Marie Morley Sworn to before me this NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK Registration No.02MO6434962 Day of , 2025 Qualified in Suffolk County Commi4sion Expires 06113/2026 Jacqueline Marie"Morley NOTARYPIR3LIC,ST,"a' 'i OPK Registr: : „ , Not ry P blic Conin.asion Expires U,;, 2026 :.€a sae s c"fIY sri x U x la. ��a,Kl Sv s t�� ys 7�,, 5 of "1� yJ` 3r s`,s,� z,s✓ ,.::; ' `- „`^,2. s�, .- t JJ(`aYan c� �� . �4r-�s �"t' .� "� <��rrz- �ati � ..�s'�'�' w � t CO MOM�'�rii��C M t., iYMi";N. 1?.0 .f`j}ti 4i£i✓ELO fl,£,�:;x 7J -n .. -- -- - - - -- - - , � - lirflc,d Mall I-eo `�v -��---- —�-I � �e-tlfiedlArlall f'ee fLl _ ruv e� C-X2i a SCr�/Ices�: ceS(cherkooi,aJd fce as approp nfc).'' r Y.iraSel vices 3,IreeS(check boY., dd;ee as zon oplte)� I_I Befoul"co�lp4(hardcopy) Return Reaolpt(haldropy) R� [I Return Rccoq�i(o echonro) $. / " _ ru [�Return Rompt(elooi o io) .. ..._ 1'O twd* �]'eYafied Ma I Restrloted!)alhtal 3 7- i ObtfpBl":� �] - Y� � []CartltlSign Mill WRo egaie Delivery p)r [J;3dull Slorla[re [I/\<wlt 3lynatu Ftcgiured y []Rdult Slyna-ire tiesnlcted Delivery I",]Adult Slynaturo lies41cted Delivery 1 i ` Rob rt M Duff Rd'M"M Duff ' �- r-u Seni`h Walter-Gaipa Jr _. _._ FU Patricia Donovan-Duff' iQ/.Qj L*.PmJew T-err Rd Assoc , ,55�:, ake iew-Ter _ PO Box 235 _ '1 t Ir P,Q Box 357 fast M J939 a t Iarlan Y:1J 9 s r. I e " \rr/1 f€1? ., aI y e Fz wt j r FlIC3 " T!E :' �` � s } }':. S€,�- S a ( M ) co j,-t _ ��t t,3tgi ?F j't t r � ._.,_. � 'I 1(18 t,!1�i C-�L7� yS'I zlrp/iJN Ay" � art - � ,�, L�(a�� la t eo " CIIA!cl E ,� Ccril`ied to II rCC '" - - r 1 co I vices sapproprr r nj1 1 I r ]lieturn Receipt(ha-dcopy) a - \ (7{ (-riti'a SCI tnc-s�e i eos(chock box,ado ieC s;o,ropu2eeo�' [I f'etwn-7eoelpt(e!octronie II_ ❑Return I1,9eoipt(nardcapY) - --- _.I Certinad Mail Restricted Delivery ". ! []Re nt(Deer,_...._. iulnRecce c'lonlc) ' i"C unall I]i\dalf Slynaturc;teo,uired ® Ce Helen Mail Re strlcted Delivery Adult Signature iicstrictad Delivery$ ® C 1/xdulc s;ynawre Regwrea i—_ �OSl2C7C - }CSignature Resnlcted Delivery ® I' S 1- �,oa rq M �rnrr a�Tl"eS SpanOS, Trus ee fU _I Carleton Melanthia-Spanos A 7� y ru nt CI uer __d ijl t r•.,tr E t.tX!r!o.Raab _—.. ru -. .. .... 100 Lakeview.,Ter ® 8trr,, , x r r IvNik. 4Ast$panos �_.. _ r 777 P-O-Box_ ...__. I fast Marion, NY 11939 r fl, tr „ i r �tchoue55 �� ,: at 1 ',I � r� r .s ,a f,, a J Jay.t 3r i f„`Fi(af 7Y^Sri{s tl �`( `� r)fG k � �`Sx".3✓, uU a `r v» .,.27.,=' E a err i_�Latf(tfi`ife�`R,J 3 tf€r, Pt'tcjt„ �o3€1d(�k I s Ilt/t ii 1 �t �8 .;r-i,�.; eri.ued Nldl Foe < 4 u ?,ru e'� {_Xn ra JP•I viOC3&C-ECS(c1hcR tsox,add io:rs ep plf�et c_ I I Row,,Recoip,(hard spy) rU [I Retum Receipt(eleotronle) _ 1 - 1 3} ,5p� r S n n Ua�Ifled Edell Restricx.d Lc;Iivery __. -_ H IL., : - - 4�? j` ) ( I--�I E ® []AdUlt:ilCl 1�1Cnr2(lGgUiNd Adult Signature Restrlcted U iivor — i a F, ru Marie L_Zebrowski___. a P6-1, ox` Vast Marion, NY 11939 Douglas P. Robalino Living Trust& Diane E. Robalino Living Trust 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion SCTM#: 1000-31-9-21.1 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 31.-9-22 Robert M Duff Walter Gaipa Jr c/o Lakeview Terr Rd Assoc PO Box 235 East Marion, NY 11939 31.-9-10 Robert M Duff Patricia Donovan-Duff 145 Lakeview Ter PO Box 357 East Marion, NY 11939 31.-9-9 Marie L. Zebrowski PO Box 34 East Marion, NY 11939 31.-9-19 Carleton A. Raab 100 Lakeview Ter East Marion, NY 11939 31.-8-25 James Spanos, Trustee „ Metanthia Spanos Nikolaos Spanos PO Box 777 ` N Cutchogue, NY 11935 O T ++ 14.O i = cr 47 Q -0 O ff = ca O 00 Q 0000 n a t),o = dA u O = �o M ® rl N ++ v L 3 O = O O m Q L .F.r w i a = Vf � = L J Ln � � M 03 � 3 ca 00 ° O L E m a 3 '- = o Y 3 co M _ Z O va 0 0 0 = a- C 'L J CL3 •L O �'' •F+ N a O L O w 0 H O .0 +r O co O O ea bb ♦-+ s - LA. W Z L 0 O s �, O �, co w m u (U _ � N w � O aJ H L '3 3 LLJ (1) t z co 4-0aJ .�,; m L � p � 0 00 m � O aJ 4.+ 0 s o=c 3 3 E Z ri 4-1 0 4-0 O Z '4-0 '� 'a O LL M M O _ _ L �; E L c6 M '� N � O _ aJ 0 4-J M W 4-0 • N ,�•^•• L LUu. 3: w cr -a tO m L. Ln IA aJ 3 aJ _ 'a � ++ 01 g .. 00 �, +; CL = L CO M u' 4 ,. = 3 u z _ O 3 •a O. O w L a s cn CL a UJ N a,ui 4-1 3 a. .— o s ca s V = cC = m � o 0 W CL� m �, o s O V a, � ° E s m a) L _ tA 4-1 m O V J 4- M L M m H 3 v H a n c W H W m i_+ 3 L M L •— = dA M LL W O _ 4-0 O ,a � ° � ° 3 m a, to H -0 V� = N W H V) O w m Q x M i —^ 4-0Vf > s m H N W W - to 4 m s to L 0 3 O m s 0 N O Z M 3 _ O N > m W aJ L �� O O O aJ O Ln c 3 = Z �- v -0 >_ � M a aA o E M — 3 '� w ROBALINO Ctf N/0/F RESIDENCE o CARLETON A. RAAB 1695 Bay Avenue > >> 1978 SF VEGETATED NON TURF BUFFER EXISTING LANDSCAPE East Marion, New York S 4 3° 19 4 0 265 SF GRAVEL NON-TURF TO REMAIN 221 . 84 BUFFER FOR CIRCULATION T--a- NEWp,Y �Q -- Q 001 X—_X X X X ` -- -- I \ WIRE FENCE' ^ g FENCE TWO TIERS OF 30"MASONRY WALLS FENCE J p \ 0 7 N �' ` \ \\, PROPOSED WITH 36"BETWEEN WALLS O 1 .7'S. 1 .5'W. O Q '; \; PLANTED WITH NATIVE GRASSES 0 � � W maFshall poetzel • zY o M - EXISTING CONCRETE WALL IN DISREPAIR LANDSCAPE A R C H I T E C T U R E 42,9 cn p oo �— N 0 N-D I S T \ TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED QO _ B NCE E--qw �— � m C o �. rER N - O PO Box 478 Q 30,0 Q REMOVE TIRES/TRASH/DEBRIS BY HAND • a LAWN I{ 5175 Middle Road J �- (NO USE OF MACHINERY)IN NON-DISTURBANCE M O > Z Y }, ` BUFFER.SEED EXPOSED SOIL WITH NATIVE C Mattituck,NY 11952 �J TW 18.0 SEED MIX AFTER REMOVALS. tr U p O) O BW 15.5 \ { phone: (631) 209-2410 w fax: (631)315-5000 O cv > U Q J �--•- �.► O O a f7] p u �' I email: studio@mplastudio.com 'j' 0 2 STORY "� AIR CONDITIONER o1 0 Tw15.5 FRAME GARAGE N � ' UNIT � � BW73.0 �- CV 12 SURVEYOR: • — STEPPING ST NE: WALK O I I Z .. ;\.,\. J Nathan T.Corwin O M — CL 1586 Main Road (d d AMP MASONRY BLOCK i I w m .\ Z Jamesport, NY 11947 POST I I (� , 30' J Office: (631) 727-2090 0 30.0 _ — Q 0' Q Y J 43.4' 14.3' W Z MASONRY 67 J Q i::• [I ' O ,Z \ ,W \ BRICK EDGING V U ._ ! ' Z ti Y ZQ z � \\ r°U p o WOOD DECK I I O Q � v .v c ° w Cn v N OVER CONC. II P 'I rr-- J 0 m t` o• D Q Z . W Z o I \ w D D D p m w ;I 45'\.\DECK. ,. L (�, F- > _ t� o ASPHALT p 6 � 50' HOUSE y D RIVEWAy Da v V. a 1 STORY FRAME HOUSE 10.0' Y\' \ = N � c •' MASONRY v u p OCK WALLij K N 11 �\ �\\\ w • N R \ Y r7 . . . nl � w ® BRI b v o I c� w •' Ck ED V REMOVE CONCRETE O Ld 2 Q I— ' DING D PAD AND REPLACE � (� I J W D . W/PERVIOUS GRAVELMAS I 1 I Li LAM DNRY BLOCK v D oN I I Q z ° P POST D' z ° CELLAR ENTRANCE ~ tn' -1 /� W O TW 18.0 Z L J > U BW 15.5 p O \ Y O 1 _ D \ 'n Q_ L J ' \ Q I NALK IN 28.0, OS' � ' `� Tw15.5 '� \` •, \\ W� MASONRY BRICK EDGING U w �� 20.9 BW13.o ROOK o �o ,� I \ \, Z WATER FALL g o z GONG. vi CHIMNEY \ big w ' N p o 12 Q pR ' 4.4 x 0- qI z Z FENCEQ V)J wLL- 0.6000NC. WALL GRATE: WOOD DECK 00 w=c i z & STEPS .S' 1.3 E. o U� o \ j r 0 N� CONC. i \ SITE DATA: w SCTM#: 1000 31 09 21.1 ERH MASONRY BLOCK WALL ^ Zoning District: R-40 OV EAD WIRES340 .12 '40 C _----- z : . 'z Z \ Lot Area: 22,351 SF (or 0.513 acres) U ; : �� N LINK _ o \ \ L(] TILITy — HAI FENCE CONC. o \ . NOTES: POLE ;n GA WALK :• w. 9.3' � N TE , ` ^' d ev NC'.. \ 1. Base map information based on survey OVERHEAD U ' 9 3, ^ / f'�Q� \ \ prepared by Nathan T. Corwin H D WIRES (� O dated November 25, 2023. �q • s CONC. , WALK N\ \ \ o UTILITY / 2. This drawing is for the purpose of -- - / \ , METER & STEPS POLE obtaining permits only. NOT FOR ' ER LO CONSTRUCTION. UTILITY r ED POLE / \ ` ; 3. Unauthorized alteration of this plan is a GE OF PAVEMENT f, ! violation of NYS Education Law. GUY !—OVER REVISIONS WIRE �.�H . WIRES • 224'. 47 DATE DESCRIPTION g 13 GRATE A \` \ BULKHEAD EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN �—� RAILING 4'-0" S e a I CA M n REINFORCED SOIL NATIVE GRASSES(TYP.) SITE PLAN `� , 002710'N Q� • EMBEDMENT -1> OF NE`N�O 1" SCALE: 1"= 10'-0" GEOSYNTHETIC CAP UNIT W REINFORCEMENT(TYP.) IT _ _ • 8,. SEGMENTAL q W_ L J J RETAINING "' ~ TITLE: REAR DRAIN SYSTEM WALL UNIT Q WHEN REQUIRED O I 12"(MIN.)OF FREE 00 • DRAINING AGGREGATE 1 FINISHED SITE O GRADE • L J L J EMBEDMENT r�� PLAN GENERAL NOTE: APR 1 1 2025 -DRAIN SHOULD BE AT BOTTOM OF WALL WHEN POSSIBLE. -UTILIZE RAISED DRAIN LOCATION WHEN BOTTOM OF WALL 6"(MIN.)COMPACTED DRAINAGE IS NOT POSSIBLE. 6„ GRANULAR BASE -STRAIGHT FACE UNITS ARE SHOWN FOR SIMPLICITY. SOU,1oid Town 0 5 10 4"DIA.(MIN.)DRAIN TILE LEVELING PAD -DETAILS ARE APPLICABLE TO ANY FACE STYLE. BO -d of T"UStE@S (ELEVATION VARIES) 2'-0"� H4=1 r SCALE 1" = 10' ti 2 TYPICAL TIERED SECTION DRAWN BY: MENDO Detail SCALE: 1/2"= 1'-0" D.CHECKED A CHECKED BY: J.PAETZEDATE: . 4.0 L 1 .0 DATE:2025.04.03 REVISED: �,UFFQ� Glenn Goldsmith, President �� Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President 54375 Route 25 Eric Sepenoski P.O.Box 1179 Liz Gillooly ®y ®� Southold,NY 11971 Elizabeth Peeples Telephone Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection Report Date/Time:—� - �� - G VCompleted in field by: DOUGLAS P. ROB LINO LIVING TRUST & DIANE E. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST site inspection to further discuss the modifications the Board requested during the March 20, 2024 Public Hearings. Located: 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion. SCTM# 1000-31-9-21.1 Type of area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland $ Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: Chapt. 275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency -Pre-Submission Violation Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes No Not Applicable Info needed/Modifications/Conditions/Etc.: f y Y Present Were: lG. Goldsmith `'/N. Krupski ` E. Sepenoski �-'L. Gillooly E. Peeples cM f St.Q}io.srvt bl.ro Owst t.....5 s4mpip maj • r I�h ' M• .- 4 qg S Stj j*V;rN sivo otwtsL"" S4-re,?p%ht) x r a. .. i � t i an'%c\ w.A—A+nos s 1.b M�oS Jo 30%1+M-.r4% CwrL%.% s .f' Am = r r lb hK��'a�,.+-tic ��n�tl�^^o a��a, Na�}�.S Sbb UN•t FFQJ Glenn Goldsmith,President Y�0�0 ell - Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President A_ 54375 Route 25 Eric Sepenoski ,? P.O.Box 1179 Liz Gillooly �y • 0�� Southold,NY 11971 Elizabeth Peeples rh¢ Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection Report Date/Time: 1Z )WkZe7Y Completed in field by: James DeLucca, R.A., LLC on behalf of DOUGLAS P. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST & DIANE E. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST requests a Wetland Permit for the as-built 1,628sq.ft. one-story dwelling with attached 186sq.ft. east side deck with steps and 405sq.ft. west side deck with steps; as-built 181 sq.ft. PVC pergola; as-built 345sq.ft. west side concrete patio; 526sq.ft. of as built concrete walkways; 827sq.ft. of as-built step-stone walks; as-built 598sq.ft. masonry block walk; as-built 1,600sq.ft. brick & asphalt driveway; existing previously permitted 1,380sq.ft. two-story garage; and 10' diameter by 8' deep cesspool with shallow dome. Located: 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion. SCTM# 1000-31-9-21.1 Type of area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland X Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _�Chapt. 275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes No Not Applicable Info need ed/Modiific tions/Conditions/Etc.: Alut „z / ati Present Were: y G. Go smith �/N. Kr pski E. Sepenoski L. Gillooly E. Peeples REVVISIONS . _ c1n1vERAL NOT. I 9/30/18 I,v,, I5/25/Iq 1JVC �-- 6n DIAMETER �� 1. All construction shall be in N.Y.S., A.C.I.with Rall einforced �j rI 'csection s of Building Coda of N. 'etvuctural Steel'Manual, 11 1 Iq VD eenar.t• Building code, A.I:m:.C. sit and Steel Joint Instite Specificati4ne. , 2. All construction is to be in accordencs with prevailing codes and standards, when building In other jurisdictions, variat6ons or adjuetments may be required. vasify any such REFLECTIVE aaD REFLECTIVE.WHITE rsgniremesbe with the local code or enforcement officer. r FANTONN Mm7 3. All materials and-methods of construction for this-project I must conform to the requirements of all applicable federal, -I state and local ordinances. 6. All materials for this Project shall be installed-in ` compliance with manufactures specifications and recommandat16Aa. ' • S. The Architect or angine•r assumes n4 responsibility for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, or for safety-preoauticgm and program in connection with work. There are no Nairanties, nor any marchaindibility of fitness for a sMcific use-expressed-or Implied in the use of theme-plans. - 6.- The architects-or engineers c@ztitiyation applies only to this plan. Alteration of this documgnt except by a*licensed professional Architect or Engineer 1s tl•T�gal: 7. Architects or Engineers seal ana siymature only good for H initial use of drawings. Changes alterations or reviaione'to re-use of drawing* without Archftecjs or Engineers approval voids Seal and Signature on sane. V-4 112N 8. Contractor to verify all dim•nsioty (V aroOns anket or engiveer of an conditions, before 0 STROKE construction, and notify the TM OOnstrYCtlOn typo - discrepancies. Do.not mgale drawing9, follow ftennniona y H designation shall be only. ulw,slln,"111^ eIV"or"Ir 9:. All Plumbing is to conform to N.Y.S. •••� e I to Indicate the construction requirements. and Local plumbing Cods e..t clasaMcatlon of the w�1 structure under DESILRNATION FOR STRUCTURAL 10. Electrical work to conform to the Wejonal Elsctrio coca and � W>. M applicable Local Codes. semtion 002 of the BCNY!{ ) COMPONENTS THAT ARE OF � Z '11. All lumbar' to- Doug / 71• TRUSS TYPE CONSTRUCTION g r use 01 and 25e /2. a 12. .nll footings to rent on virgin soil or'coapaoted'per code.. N W O "F" FLOOR FRAMING,INCLUDING > ■ ■ GIRDERS AND BEAMS 13. Soaring capacity of soil shall conform to building code. S eel ■ ■ 28 day tin. Q >. INC16Rn ROOF FRAMING 16. All concrete is ,3,500 •P.S.I. S s FR FLOOR AND ROOF FRAMING 15. All lumber and plywood must be qra% mtaipsa. t`� ca STANDARDS AND CODES 16. All construction must comply with the 2015 INTERNATIONAL 0 RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR ONE-AND TNO-FANILY DWMINGS FOR- O%q V NEW YORE STATE. s ` ,4 W 17. Double sup port etude under all heatless 6'-0" and larger.' 18. Double framing members are required around all openings and below all parallel partitions. 19. SIMPSON CONNECTORS, so noted on the drawings A as required, on all flush structural load carrying conditions and load' Q Path conditions. � v- 20. All interior headera to be ( 2 ) ( 2 x 6 ) except as noted on plan. V 4' 21. All exterior headers to be as note Q - FZ do F 9 on pleas. 22. Smoke and carbon monokid• detectory J W Z I TT I G- detecting devices, electrically operated, are to M 1:,sta11W per code. Q 23: 'All bath rooms without a window mutt vented to exterior, except as noted be provided with a fan on plan, per code. 1 24. BUIconsDINGtruction. PERMIT to required prior to the start Of Uj Z a ~ construction. W LU 25'. The following drawings are only for the J of the existing roof structure wi Pro sed replacement N �O trusses, re-building of the existib lured roof 'v- �I FIRST 2'� _removal and installation of non-b0gr rear wood deck* and the zkg Fes, noted on floor plan.,The remaindera,,ng interior walls es Z. 7.� 2"I z��l 2 z��l is not the rempongibiiity of the At the-existing structure ' chitect., Ek ~ I 1 ,rZ" ITUB 5HOWER pIED E J E :/ i.• A' 2 9 0 INTO SE"IG D JAN 2OZ4 I y I S`(STCM 1 � I D s NED DR-AWU- Soutl1old Tow rl 'ST ®• 02365� ypQ �J esDATE . - F [3oar d of Trustees � 7/1e/2ote PLUMBING sf~cT1oN ®F �dE`� -- AS NOTED "c, XM NO. C AS s3u1.uT vRAwINGs oASgD lob 12_2,CZC37 — REVISIONS 4/17/2018 JV( 4/19/2018 JV[ c 3 32 0 5/25/2018 JV[ ' 9/30/2018 JV[ 5/15/2019 JV[ 10/12/2020 JV[ 4._,. DN. io iv N r 30 e — 58 40— 30 4a 2 2 I ON. q I I o WOOD DECK I LL �O v FD v (2) WDH210410 _ �--- v I WOOD DECK Z M I • 11'-T 4• 19 S• I •q� J . CATHEDRAL R. •I ~ LIVING 7-�� m w>C3i.BEDROOM O Z �, I 12 12 Z O 4 I I jy 0 % ® � DINING ROOM Q Q W I of ¢ m LID W In I za � N I I U N CL g a I p 111111II IIIIII nro°v SKY m DOME I 2�v IIIIIIII V-0• ROOF OVERHANG L___ KITCHEN TYP CD BATH V48 • GG6,.��q1wF��' ! �C�y }26 zgU Z38• oZ a QED 2-3• PANTRY o w26 — g < \7, BEDROOM 3 MIN! BEDROOM #2 #3U� W g // \V & 14' 8-2' 4' 3'-0• 4' 10'•3' 9'3' eI 023 I � FOYER OF � � eco_ - - 3a 4 o - - - - - -304o a - - - - - -40 — .J -- ——————_� REPLACED CONSTRUCTION E c E IJ v 1 EXISTING CONSTRUCTION 32'-0" ——————- TO BE REMOVED DESIGNED S® SMOKE ALARM N J.V.D. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DRAWN so AND KEALAMONOXIDEM EXISTING AND PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN JAN 2 q 2024 L.B.2 REMAINING EXISTING DATE i' crn AND SMOKE ALARM _� CONSTRUCTION 1/3/2018 �D FAN VENTED TO EXTERIOR SCALE:�"= 1'-0" _ SCALE 4 Southold Town AS NOTED Board of Trustees S BUhLl 'DRAWI_NG DATEOIOC/�12�2 2 5/25/1 —74V I 10/12 ZO20 Jyo pIZOPosEp REP�AGEMEhiT ROOF --------------- EI,FHI ."rlllllllllllllllllllillill nL STRucruFZF TYP. i P VC)PO5 Em, 19-C)" X zap-o" 'YJ p !7 ELIG PROPO`LE D RIGHT' SIDE ELEVATION PROPOSED REAR ELEVAT ION J E C E W AL J A N 2 9 2024 (�RoPoSEO REPLACEMENT RooF sTRUGT�/RE TYP. PRO POSEr> P VG TRIG a oAR1>S TYP P'Ropo5aty VINYL SIPINc, TYP. C-outho!d Town Board of Trustees ED A z I Z --- ---- ' '9T 02365� OF NEB Ell ivv CN■CN■O C ■ I.S MOTrp JOB NO. AS BUILT DRAWING DATED 10/I2�0 02 D. Ko EALINo �- - -- ■NC■T PROPOSED LEFT SIDE ELEVkTION PROPOSED FRONT ELEVP,,-MC) I . Yq n = ( -0 1. SURVEY OF PROPERTY S . � . 2 5 SITUATE MAIN ROADEAST MARION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-31 -09-21 . 1 SCALE 1 "= 10, SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 OCTOBER 27, 2017 ADD PROPOSED ADDITIONS APRIL 15, 2018 REVISE PROPOSED DECK MAY 21, 2018 ADD TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY JUNE 21 , 2018 ADD NON-DISTURBANCE BUFFER OCTOBER 18, 2018 UPDATE SURVEY AUGUST 9, 2023 UPDATE SURVEY NOVEMBER 25, 2023 UPDATE SURVEY AREA = 22,351 sq. ft. H 0.513 ac. LOT COVERAGE OVER UPLAND LOT AREA (20,042 sq. ft.) DESCRIPTION AREA X LOT COVERAGE HOUSE 1,636 sq. ft. 8.2X GARAGE 690 sq. ft. 3.5X I CONC. BUILDING 69 sq. ft. 0.3X X TUTHILL (2) DECKS 564 sq. ft. 2.8X S PATIJPERGOLA 144 s . ft. 0.7X q 24 RICHT OAY I + N 55*4792091 E TOTAL 3,103 sq. ft I 15.5X PERMITTED LOT COVERAGE = 20X OF UPLAND LAT AREA MONON . MASONRY H 3.0 0 BRICK APRON o EDGE OF PAVEMEW m T!1 m ?• - Iw N� OVERHEAD MIRES 4m 4�6- m a, Iy � G (/' NOTES: x Z -P 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.A.V.D. 1988 DATUM I V; EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS: xx.x d m EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: x- I ° - F.FL.- FIRST FLOOR b x C0 G.FL.- GARAGE FLOOR -i TB - TOP OF BULKHEAD p I O BB - BOTTOM OF BULKHEAD r� z N ITW TOP OF WALL f0 BW - BOTTOM OF ALL� D � co v { � o • a G v Id v G 15.0'� 23.0' v. d v .G• 'd '+1 • v °' v �N o 'd D-00 p z •d •v v. e' i a •40 v v ° d G' 15.0'� I 'dd d.v v °• 5.3' 23.0' r a " N 7.9' MASONRY o STEPPING a 8.1' BLACK WALL m STONE WALK PLASTIC COVER a� GRAVEL c ram• . e 10'DIA• x 8'DEEP w � : .."."�..�,,;.•.,..;,;.'..,p, CESSPOOL�ME ; SHALL o 11.9' n� f 11.3 o � m ' STEPPING 10.2 MASONRY + I STONE WALK- PVC N BLOCK WALL No / PERGOLA N 12.7 7.0' 50 10.0' QI 36.1 HOUSE _ 170 PERGOLA I27.9' - Y W SEWER VENT 1.8' 32.2' : 1 4.9 r 14.0' 17.3' . MASONRY M ,•'�'• BLOCK PATIO I rn P. rn o f CA m m / N _ Z4 9D 1 I moo $ / ; p 5.4 I ~ m + czi �c 1.7' / 16 20.5 / A:woo D. ZOP of / CONC.. Mi wbo I \ \ \ 10.9 CONC. STEPS �Q. WpOD STEPS 37.6' CONC. 404.5 CbNPUND \ `vr +gym +zr o 12 \ 7 4' \ \ I TW C.WALL ' '+ DIS Ep` i / a \ \ \ TWA 6 66.6' IB - i - 10 m \ _ 4 Z O 8 / 9.4' \ \ 10 TW13 IN DISREPAIR 6 y . MI - TOE OF BANK i - � I I � - I �o FLAG i /"IrlP ' LANDWARD LIMIT OF WETLANDS FLAG b / FLAG j I FUG N i JAN 2 9 2024 2bo .121 FLAG _ ._.... ._. p UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION 7 TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF S 5 3"0 9'2 5" W �- SECTION 72LA OF THE NEW YORK STATE TIE LINE ALONG APPARENT HIGH WATER MARK ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 EDUCATION LAW. 1 COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI- TUTION. CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE. THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. MARIONLAKE PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR TITLE SURVEY'S AS ESTABLISHED Nathan Taft Corwin III BY THE LIALS. AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED FOR SUCH USE BY THE NEW YORK STATE LAND Land Surveyor TITLE ASSOCIATION. OF p, P''; Successor To: Stanle J. Isaksen, Jr. L.S. �. E. y Joseph A. Ingegno L.S. TAFreo �0 Title Surveys - Subdivisions - Site Plans - Construction Layout Fax (631)727-1727 ' L• _ PHONE (631)727-2090 OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS 1586 Main Road P.O. Box 16 °°.•°�pQ� Jamesport, New York 11947 Jamesport, New York 11947 _, '°" •1✓ .'MY.S. Lim. No. 50467 E Mail: NCorwin3®aol.com °��i€Its'• .' 37-237E1 Douglas P. Robalino Living Trust Diane E. Robalino Living Trust 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion SCTM# 1000-31-9-21.1 x , l If 4104 IF 7 yIt ' ts�rytJ•� �, � {� .i*�� A �` � r a `r..�. ;t . +y� Z r y� - _ " �✓'wp it :�. dL �'..' ``✓..4 ♦�, IL..�►. �] V • s �' .r •+ 'i�r tea .� ( r-r' � � ��'� 4 ` 3 'i!'�'IYC. �`,C. • �" r '`� �. f ,�•.��,�, f i dy 'a,:. ,� t y1��'��-° 'i'�47,r- �� .„•.`+��-7��`�+„'• � s�� /' •'�'►i ,�� .Fi3y?:.i'. a• � 's fif �� ..•' �i ♦ J�r].+,�7�'..a .-. AM& •.�y +`. ..�, ��. �♦ v ar J• .� � i1.Z-1_. `�fx f .r: a :`?. x �' '� .R ••:. Aar 13 J • a .Y►'1fr '- .`�� .IP`' *�G j '9 ,A• .ti:lD T.J. ,. ,1 ' 0 a Ol Of,• ti it � � r x'l,I��i';y+ a NA Ent I in •\ i N '� o � �ty a �. • - •- �. ` � "f' F �!►' will WON Air. t l f �i � KKR' �. *k - >R�• +'i•a� ' _ -..- '�. .k 'Y- 'Douglas P. Robalino Living Trust MarionDiane E. Robalino Living Trust 11695 Bay Avenue, East t - '' - rj� J•Y f �. J • - • ter•' - �•�. -y • •,;. «,. yy, tt,ti• '�� J •I \a L `•i ' y "4` :•fir✓� 3:�t.�- Y;- � — ZIfir: r y t� 4<1 IMF r •off .= _.. ' . r--. r.. � .y�i r �• .�,. •- -},.✓ - •ter. ,�l •,,ems r •� y r �� 1 �r �ri Jrr „ 'I,.i:I ''_ ,�/.• r •1 fin ' ! .�.� �e , r or Ot 1 "i t. v Ito As, > f ••►aAOG�� l It � , � 1 1 iilil ;lt:lil • . t i � � ! , i •� An,�� [1' t x',� ,�I, ,i,' ' ! �;, ; � �, r' !, ',; �.�YR ,II ;73 It , ! 1 1 1 ,l F f (j .1 i• i �.II� it , ',I I { �•, I {''' 1 i!1 R ' till :+. i� �t �` AOOP 4�- / � / ' •/ � � 3 / 12 / 20 4 8 : 12 lo, Ordj / AF r AF AF IF t r Diane E. Robalino Living Trust 1695 Bay Avenue, • Aw ef -"F,, An- a s 'idl.� `�`.. two ,� �•• �Ys' �'.'. ^♦ - �� j r ,•lid. Ai -hr: YvV'�r.i�tir.-.�.ai. - `cw � ,` `� `. `1 "s'!•��r. rt: i, ,U.(• .may t i�;� f1'`P•� Y L _ ` ��t�;�— . ' � - - � - t;"fir •. a INIPP if .C?I �. y^ �. �• _ op _,4,t; '�ykt.y` '`Y .:I •_..a `> r�,♦;r � P /,,�j,Ki•rrr � rI� - �iR�,r' ��t ��R kt4ri A +' r 'i'i� 'f"r'•1�1..� � ..±.'T�.'.r'-•`-5 ,fe' ) S f . _ � a.♦ ,. ...r L �� .� �...:,.,x."-�' ;N `�: _s�r �'��,� ,�: *' : J/ 12,/2�0,2•�4 i 16 � , ��• � � r rs>f,�4 9.r� rC :,. +'R•f,+�• �, X/� ,ta � .ir`i � 1� •��' •�'," i lop _ `• �K ok . .z • 2024 air' 'P� ; .�'"4n;• �-,;� . � i I t i iVL i r i JA N 2 9 2024 Sout�i�,ia Town P^?rd of Trustees I "' '`;fir �,�•�' �w 1 N [ E 2024 Sou'h,�Id Town IL w x +.. • '7 f hrli�• ��i�y s ��• ��• x I ''t�.i/+,a��aril. d` +1��, �� is fir, FIN IMF •, � @@ i�•YC It F .� - e sti - aT ? a E: `Ma a� 3 �`�" `o.eeNc w. sEe acc nD oiF i :..✓' .0 Dn 4wE �Mh \ as-°e a .4y Lam Y�- y '.l 6 N f6 4 Y i W\\0�.- •ert 5N @ L e x3\ •w 0.4 �41 a J^t ., ♦ .'� ^z. 8" a �' y •�S ;.J h g e oj� _w.02 •; '•�� ,+ ,Y ,I.tS 110 F �, �` e��t I, Er�t W 2). '�. '2 -T �8 a�. 4 •'i .°s e •y2 YaoA t:vtt @ �,,at e" h ` MAIN r �, a .sz AA— s - - ye .» 'kJ°re!'.. ':shy e 1 „�.•.,. .^,r a^"' a a_s;<...-ty'"� t'e ai , oa i''� iY i°°Pl��, N S�3 ,J m m e '� vi•Y E b '"' ar,3, t°_�_- �'. t ¢ s:a `` +. e °�� 101 ;Y 1. hl.._ v 'ri .ffi is °`ti, � . a ° f2�,a ,x �. ,� .•1\ St �, bit? 'M U fW5 $e q ` w,5\\1 \\9 a M °µ" `a �. ci ... i., �•.� a6� • Q of 2�! i `,� ,sz d, . 6 V kJ iJ>> ,F:e�°cv ti i J a',�wv� yk ,$�e u °tyy�i `,`� :J `a �1! ` •s "I i y♦ '� C, t, i. 9 a, It pAl,vai w,e oa roe 'x 9q fin zMa xN �`.\ esµu, "le ti i s tif oa ry'z ;t uvn cauN,r �,S aNua 6'� �9 a ,. 9 a xe I �y �e��,"- `� M1 •4 � `"♦ i.q 40 mao v >r.. ♦ +u/ M1 a y� •a _ �. JS s iy. 11 all, ,'� pr ,,i a t, i'`$'�\, e',: �•`ti a.,.s. ` '� ^ se i eµ� f�,.,. �1 ea __ w3 ,fi�• .^ s y, � ^. � � roww of sourNoln t + ,. J c,\ _ ... :^ ;.`•�it° J ,J '�'. si a�,_.jS°�+' ;v .a yi�0 J ^v. A�a.,\, ,�\j,!" �_ ,� ,. a WRION LAKE lAp. I i I ^ M1 ° '.v e'.-_• / Y> �, t p.P ` M1� S^Y'"°'few ,Jsegef .:� � a'� �* �� •��`r �, _-. � �yw s 'yA :t �, ♦ a J" v c�d'�\ � a y�,. �.�� ,n I�, �,q,��x o f� ��`'` ' Hy r, ze, x.3 n s aeia s ^ zw i, a w I +'r 9�,8j{l v>• 3m i8 Y;+<'. n,r x 21. - h �. , fx� 3'� � 22A ,��* ��," a.,ryM1 a e.ir.$ �,, Y�,yI. ��M1��®._,•, .`r 41 MARION LAKE d T d X a x c !° a - I' a � 9 14ouv xa � x, � L- .�, y:.•�. !9 ,. `d'a ,J ;A S` •' . ,. s 3. IE „s I' ix YtN°I °1•�t@� ° y'W. c=`� ` .,fie �....W e, M1 � .',Q l�n. Y � e' `:c� � S -,N" �f,2•'\ �, �` � v^,^__.x .ia �' e I n a•� �" .r .,�•��` Aa`kme— �5,..,.'K.::l• �,t•.•:�,f3z„ , ,� , .v q n C? f .}yyy, iylJy.as p � .: a.. - ,...,,...� ---- _..... ... COUNTY OFSUFFOLK N'/ N NCIFCE _ ,,.,,ro Im D w_� _ �.n, _•__ "�` v =. _ �,w.. �.� Hest P,.I.,tf 1..Seivtce Apcucy uuNrBwrE,n,srawu save Y W _ -.. — E w „ m ,M eourxD2n 031 N �A-- —.—_ „"' J00I.un AnclMMd XY.NU S,Rux mH,\'TN,WPB FD p ,m •• �o 8 I1E L MpC(IY TN(99M5 NYd OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 �g Telephone: 631 765-1938 � �" u i ®9 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Glenn Goldsmith, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, AICP LWRP Coordinator Date: March 20, 2024 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for DOUGLAS P. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST& DIANE E. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST SCTM# 1000-31-9-21.1 James DeLucca, R.A., LLC on behalf of DOUGLAS P. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST& DIANE E. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST requests a Wetland Permit for the as-built 1,628sq.ft. one-story dwelling with attached 186sq.ft. east side deck with steps and 405sq.ft. west side deck with steps; as-built 181 sq.ft. PVC pergola; as-built 345sq.ft. west side concrete patio; 526sq.ft. of as built concrete walkways; 827sq.ft. of as-built step- stone walks; as-built 598sq.ft. masonry block walk; as-built 1,600sq.ft. brick& asphalt driveway; existing previously permitted 1,380sq.ft. two-story garage; and 10' diameter by 8' deep cesspool with shallow dome. Located: 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion. SCTM# 1000-31-9-21.1 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the as-builts are INCONSISTENT with LWRP Policy 6.3 and, therefore, INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. In the event the application is approved the following is recommended to meet Policy 6: 1. The installation and upgrade to an I/A OWTTS. 2. The installation of a revegetation plan on the bank/bluff. The removal of tires. 3. A non-disturbance buffer was established by Covenant in 2019 and is shown on the survey. Please verify that portions of the non-disturbance buffer were not cleared of vegetation. Aerial photos suggest that the area seaward of the concrete wall was cleared. 4. Require a vegetated buffer designed to control erosion be installed from the seaward rear of the house. 5. Require that the applicant remove all foreign debris seaward of the concrete retaining wall. 6. Require that drainage on all impervious surfaces is installed. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Honorable Lori Hulse, Attorney , t F r, 449 Caroline Burghardt,Chairperson Town Hall,53095Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary ft P.O.Box 1179 ► Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1889 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held on Wed., March 13, 2024, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Maggie Merrill, seconded by Inga Van Eysden, it was RESOLVED to NOT SUPPORT the application of DOUGLAS & DIANE ROBALINO LIVING TRUST to re-construct existing residence and install additional site improvements. Existing dwelling, garage and PVC pergola, wood decks, concrete walks, west side concrete patio and step stone walks. Masonry block walk, brick and asphalt driveway, and 10' dia. X 8' deep cesspool with shallow dome. Located: 1695 Bay Ave., East Marion. SCTM#31-9-21.1 Inspected by: Inga Van Eysden, Carol Brown, Maggie Merrill The CAC does Not Support the application as submitted, and recommends an erosion control plan, and the installation of an I/A septic system. The CAC recommends the applicant contact Cornell and obtain a list of appropriate plantings for the area. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried BOARD MEMBERS OF SOVj Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �.� .�Q 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora C Office Location: Eric Dames �o Town Annex/First floor, Robert I.ehnert,Jr. l 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento yCuT`t,� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 6 @ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APR - 2019 Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 1 , Sou hold Town Clerk FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF MARCH 28, 2019 ZBA FILE : 7247 NAME OF APPLICANT: Douglas Robalino PROPERTY LOCATION: 1695 Bay Avenue,East Marion SCTM No. 1000-31-9-21.1 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated October 31, 2019 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated March 5, 2019. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is EXEMPT from Coastal Consistency Review. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The parcel is a non-conforming 22,351 SF corner lot located in an R-40 Zoning District with 224.47 feet of frontage on Bay Avenue and additional road frontage of 83 feet on Tuthills Path, a private dirt road (24-foot-wide right of way). The eastern lot line, shared with a residential neighbor, measures 221.84 feet with a southern lot line of 118.27 feet on Marion Lake. As a result of a corner location, the property is classified as having two front yards. The parcel is currently improved with a one-story single-family residence of approximately 1,636 square feet, a wood deck and concrete retaining wall, walkways and steps, fencing and s small waterside, concrete building. This is all shown in a survey by Nathan Taft Corwin, Land Surveyor dated October 18,2018. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for a Variance under Article XXIII, Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's October 2, 2018, Notice of Disapproval based on an application to legalize "as built" demolition and proposed reconstruction of the existing single family dwelling, at; 1) less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 40 feet; at: 1695 Bay Avenue, (Adj.to Marion Lake)East Marion,NY. SCTM41000-31-9-21.1. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to decrease the front yard setback from 40 feet to 17.7 feet for an as built construction of a single-family dwelling with an attached 14 ft.by 28 ft. deck. Page 2, March 28, 2019 #7247, Robalino SCTM No. 1000-31-9-21.1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This project was granted variance relief as ZBA file # 7153, dated April 23, 2017 for additions and alterations to an existing single-family dwelling and a building permit was issued for this project in June 26, 2018; Building Permit # 42818. Subsequently, the entire structure was demolished and was being rebuilt. Once discovered by code enforcement, the project was halted. At the hearing verbal testimony was given by the contractor on the project who stated that this new application resulted from the demolition of the dwelling because areas of the house had substantial rot in the framing members. Due to the expanse of the rot, and the required repairs, walls had to be taking down and replaced, thereby exceeding the scope of the variance relief and the building permit which were granted for additions and alterations to an existing dwelling. Photos were submitted showing the expanse of the rot. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 14, 2019 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the relief will not produce and undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The general residential area surrounding Marion Lake is made up of single-family residences on non-confonning lots of varying shapes, configuration and access, many of which are sited on the lake or on Peconic Bay. The majority of the neighborhoods original bungalows have been renovated into more substantial homes reflective of modern needs. 2. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The existing residence is sited close to Bay Avenue and has stood for many years without incident. The setbacks proposed were already granted by past variance relief for additions and alterations, (#7153), and the building as it currently exists conforms to that past relief, and the approved building plans. The only reason for this variance was because of the demolition and substantial reconstruction done to mitigate rot in the existing structure. 3. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(3)1 The variance applied for is mathematically substantial, representing 55.7% relief from the code. However, the relief requested has previously been granted in a past variance (# 7153), while still substantial will allow the applicant to enjoy the renovated residence. 4. Town Law $267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code, 5. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to the time of purchase. 6. Town Law $267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a renovated house, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 3, March 28, 2019 #7247, Robalino SCTM No. 1000-31-9-21.1 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Lehnert, seconded by Member Dantes, and duly carried,to GRANT the variance as applied for and shown on the survey prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, Land Surveyor, dated October 18, 2018 and plans, pages 1, 2 &3, prepared by James Delucca, Architect, dated July 18, 2018. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. In the event that an approval is granted subject to conditions, the approval shall not be deemed effective until the required conditions have been Tnet; and failure to comply therewith will render this approval null and void. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3) years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may, upon written` request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension not to exceed three(3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman(Chairperson),Dantes, Planamento, Acampora and Lehnert. Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing / / /2019 Glenn Goldsmith,President _w`�ur SO Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25 A. Nicholas Krupski,Vice President ,�®Vv ®�® P.O. Box 1179 Eric Sepenoski B Southold,New York 11971 Liz Gillooly Telephone(631) 765-1892 Elizabeth PeeplesrE D BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES JAN 3c 2024 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD This Section For Office Use Only Vo US of T T rustoos Coastal Erosion Permit Application _ Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit Amendment/Transfer/Extension Received Application: J 91 Received Fee: $ 9 r5 y 4 N5�Z Q1 Completed Application:,A&71 X9 Incomplete: SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted Negative Dec. Positive Dec., Lead Agency Determination Date: Coordination:(date sent): LLWRP Consistency Assessment Form Sent: CAC Referral Sent: A I gLjr ool Date of Inspection: 31 1�1-1- Receipt of CAC Report: Technical Review: Public Hearing Held: aA Resolution: Owner(s) Legal Name of Property (as shown on Deed): �oC .01 AY1g=' Ll V)a�E TO d Mailing Address: P '® �" t 2— PiAI n\/ IffW ° tj" I ® Phone Number: Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 3 09 2 Property Location: I (L�9 s Boty PCVe 6AQT TV4 f?%, '0N1 4 Nl �� ' i 193L (If necessary, provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and locdtion) AGENT (If applicable): I-A MCS \! IDE \—V C.C.P%-' �Z, P\. U-C Mailing Address: 1 2. L\Nft'DA--- L. A WF- E Eas-r-. R 1\f e5Z Vk V'AV, 1 l cicl Phone Number: (&$1) 7 2 7- 16, I I Email: .1 i►1e-Awsy D£t-o cr-kgy Oj?T•a My"\• W'E .3 r/aN `ioard of Trustees Applica,� n GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): 0. 5- G" Area Zoning: , Previous use of property: 1 NCa L-E F LL-� NCa Intended use of property: I lU C, Le 1FA,1�f\1 L'( F,>V-)eL` 1 WCA Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes v,-' No If"Yes", please provide a copy. Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? Yes f No If"Yes", be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? Yes No Does the structure (s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? Yes No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date 09 7'��N vs i�'�s 9 / //0/,9 gOlVI ✓6 &.947P of 1;75 /zd/7 70W/Alt ,604P,D ®r /9 fORF,0Ls 4 /J 1 �Po/9 No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? ✓No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): r ® �'T y c T C9l/S .✓� � '$/l��'�/G slit//TWOV7 -rHO�F 09 ✓��sT�4s 4p0R011A1- , 5,670 X T/,hf,JZSP- /—/S .5 . d,'r- le llc per, OZA 0 = i g /. ` c®NG g ,-tg-ra vvA 1 s ' iuclvp>" -s-BPs 71 F'Tz -1-07-'9L Fd✓rsT r ��9l1U C©ntCz,oATiG 3��/—% .�L( �'TdIE� co�uG . GF9/r�A- 194 1$ = 6-Z6 lt:-rz 5 =gP i ova' wAI F- j �� w TL ON",r oard of Trustees Applicai `a WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: LEeAAL 1Z i—= ��CI�✓t'I�� II��NG� Area of wetlands on lot: 21 �J®� square feet Percent coverage of lot: % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 5a feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? k cubic yards How much material will be filled? N cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Al l� Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): AIAS over- 64WAI .��!Y Ff��T' GA j5jCJS71AI6 Wr7'4�91vPs Board of Trustees Applica 'n COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: N1 Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? '� No Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? ✓ No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? /y�/9 (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? /UIA (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed, including erosion increase or adverse effects on natural protective features. (Use attachments if necessary) Vo/✓1e i 617.20 Appendix B. Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1 -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 -Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: ®001ML-P11.5 R05NI_IN0 Project Location(describe',and attach a location map): 1 f©q S 13Ad A%V So ]E AS"r M P+R i 0" i t�l 9`(. 1 (W-6c Brief,Description of Proposed Action: . (1) RS MOVE EXIS`r1?444 1^M ST14C-7 fre u"VIsTvoN g k2, RF-eUWLV.> 5%Wat~-'E OX►ST►w1cI tZOUMDArte)W UGINCa 1 KIE t3Ui"0'%A4C4 i=00•rfA%mi4l. C-IMSTVW1 5Y rr.V k0R i AS1 S(PC N(AhArA SiiD� �(I1R® Sz"1ZU C; p Rop&G SC7 W C-S-r GtV)VF `(h,RP �le'z'TGt��Cht V>�zK� Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: (CO-3 1' 7Z7•- 1(at 1 JANl-,ES Flo 1:>V— Lue-6�, �,�^ E-Mail:JAMMSvr?-.LUCC.A Address: G PT'IMV o i t 5—T ( Z Uwc>A LkLi» F P.S`T City/PO: State: Zip Code: -91\1 1sic> ►-4-\(. 1 ( �o 1 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that 9 may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or finding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s)name and permit or approval: ❑ 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? O, 7 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? Q, -510 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? /VOA/157 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural (non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial D<Residential (suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? X ❑ b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? El X ❑ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? El 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: X ❑ 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES M El b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? ❑ 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: ❑ X 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: ❑ lig 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: L1EgL"1*X--7 ❑ Rgtiet 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? � ❑ b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? ❑ 13.a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban ❑Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats, listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? X ❑ 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ❑ a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: 54NO ❑YES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: ❑ 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: X ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ® ❑ I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE 1 Applicant/sponsor r e: J AMTa Lucca R- A' Date: Signature: , si Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the.following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning El ❑ regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? ❑ ❑ 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? ❑ ❑ 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the ❑ ❑ establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or El ❑ affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate ❑ ❑ reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: ❑ ❑ a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? ❑ ❑ 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, ❑ ❑ architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, ❑ Elwaterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage ❑ ❑ problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? ❑ ❑ Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-tern, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Town of Southold-Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date President Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title or Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 I lard of Trustees, ,Appli.cat.' =a • x AFFIDAVIT D I AN k Pc)SAW P6 DOLES RoBALA V�t BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES,THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES, INCLUDING THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL,TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, INCLUDING A FINAL INSPECTION. I FURTHER AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY AND AS REQUIRED TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY CONDITION OF ANY WETLAND OR COASTAL EROSION PERMIT ISSUED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES DURING THE TERM OF THE PERMIT. S gnature 6f Property Owner Signatu�of erty Owner SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 20j-71"4 S AL SUS AN M CURRY Notary Public NOTAWPUBUC.STATE OF NEW YORX Registration No.OICU6017899 Qualified n Nassau co h My Commission Expires Trustees A licat T , yard of pp ► t AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) I/We, owners of the property identified as SCTM# 1000- 31 og — Z I ° d in the town of Sou-F HOLC ,New York, hereby authorizes JNmy co \J, Ds Lu cr—A0 p a 4,- to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s) from the Southold Town Board of Trustees for this property. Pr perry Owner's Signature roperty O e 's Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF , 20 J lam- SUSAN M CURRY V.W Notary Public NO?ARY KMUC,STATE OF NEW YOU &gi wWonNo,OICU6017899 QutiiwinNam U aZ�P My Commission Expires. M APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. 1 I c p YOUR NAME : `Ro eA Q ,/� ��+LAS MVLS 0 1 (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship" includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"=means-a-business, including a partnership„in which the town officer.or employee has even-a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant; or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 23 day of IWA' 20Z3 Signature � Print Name �� • ROP a yu 1��1J 3 APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE - TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The pu=se of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: D (Last name,first name,ziiiddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate,the.other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance. Building _ Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other',name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO Ii If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicantlagent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of.the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. SUSAN M CURRY NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Registration No.OICU6017899 Qualified in Nassau Coup �p My Commission Expires A / v Submitted is (� day 9�� R� 20�- Signature i Print Name ` Form TS I APPLICANUAGENUREPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the Hart of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: J A q\c S �� (Last name,first name,gtiddle initial,unless you are applying to the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate.the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other'',name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship.with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this day of Zfl � Signature ✓� a Print Nanigi NtAs S Q! r>F Lu c.c-A Form TS I ' 3oard of Trustees Applica - n PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS APPLICATION NAME & SCTM#: NAME: nn1�RF.�S: /4-C)C.,C'e-n 31 - 8- 3/4- 3 � . 5 � io 31 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK residing at being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of , 20 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office located at that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Signature Sworn to before me this Day of . 20 Notary Public Board of Trustees Application PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS APPLICATION NAME & SCTM#: 'Cot/4/A.5 /�"�� G�®��0�� / Am& NAME: ADDRESS: STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK �A"Ar- V- Ylr 2V , residing at z21 VX64A/C-�)PP �G � ��®d being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the � day of /?C , 20 ,Z4, deponent mailed a true copy of the' Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office located at that said Notices were mailed to ' each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. F r_C111ature ,., Sworn to before me this 9 1± Day of . 20 24 =()IL06057960 LOCKE NOTATLI OF NEW YORK .()1L06057960Notary Public ffolk County 1 jCres Apr.30,20— / o Er N r-a �;uLrht!stl �" NY 11937, Certified Mail Fee 40 Extra Services&Fees(check box,add lee a'a ra-sprjhte)l 1-3 ElE=i Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 44• � � [I Return Receipt(electronic) $_._. i - Postmark El Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $_—rtt Here E3 ❑Adult Signature Required $?r' �- ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ I.I I ll_! � R Postage ' m4: 11-9 Total Postage and Pees �'" r I J ;�t�frl � ,�• r9 Sent Toq i 4 t, Streand Apt. .,,ao�-r,PO Box tv Cit State ZIP+ o ____ _____ _ ____..______ -----------,,.______-____________ iJ ! ti :l l 1 • e e llle•1• 1:0 ®® r Ln r` WIN Certified Mail Fee r $ , " rtll� Certified Mail Fee Extra Services&Fees(che , • �a� $ ll IT�I I� ' E:] ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $--- 11 Extra Services&Fees(check box,add lee a p'9te) O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $_V - Post m .1��,n ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ • � ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $- � i C3 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ Postmark i 0 ❑Adult Signature Required $ -- -f Y t i ..= j Q ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ t" ♦� K )` ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ._ L.ILI Q ❑Adult Signature Required Postage ,9� `� ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$_,_,_91 I o 1��1 - m $ $1.a,77 � / CI Postage �' a f` Total Posta a and fees ��, C m $ 1 817 - e 92 rq Total Postage and Fees i-!�r i i�+ `;,tf Spent T/no► 1 � �j 0 9. )y Street and Apt.No.,orPOBoxNo. ________ _________ _________ _________..___ S1 W C, h l l Str tandAp N�a�.,o PC 0 (Vo. Ci ate,ZlP+4° a ` 6 1 I . 1 e 111•1• Clfs tate,. +4� p ��tom' ' ��7 �•�_ sm:10 1 I e Ill°B• 0 ®a ® m P- qo Fast 116' r i d g O Y`�.1 e, � as Isar I csn`> ?Y. 111939 ' . Certified Mall Fee •--.. --I- Certified Mall Fee " tit r3 $ !rtpathl{ r1 'u4• 40 f, I t, Ex4ra Services&Fees(check box,add lee a rra ) €r.jk;•h Extra Services&Fees(check box,add lee a are tti tI ss ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $` r A t ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $_—• �j t E ❑Return Recelpt(electronic) '$ P„ostmark Postmark El Receipt(electronic) $--- �f �a, `%(-(ere Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $_,• fj— -�5 J j []Adult Signature Required $ Here',. ❑Adult Signature Required $ El Adult Signature Restr'ictetl.Jelivery$ �•. t []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$_. ��•'I m Postage 5. £� 0 Postage �•. . 1-9 Total Postage and Fees r` $ , 1r�k)7 ) Total Postage and Fees $ fin 1.4f 17-9 $$9.,21 Sent To ri -- Lfl S o _ _' UJ= a -- -_------- _ er �' StreStandA t N XBoz%/yo 0 Stre t� n�dA t.No.,o PO/BpoxN/o. per^ "(� __•_ _. Q� City,S1a e,Zlej"4° _ G ___-___-----• --- f_e___________ Cit �ld[ P+1 ��1�•Y_�.4= .__^ !- !Ci.___ _0a_-�!P :IB 1 11 l l•1" el 1 11 eel•1• COWL ETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY SENDER' • • A. Si n ture ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X A ressee so that we can return the card to you. B. Re ived b Printed ame) C. D tf e'v ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, "1•(� or on the front if space permits. Ye 1. Article Addressed to: D. s delivery address different from item 1? If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No DUFF c 2 5 9 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® r I I I I II ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered Maillm II I�I III III I III I II I i I I i Ip I I I �I�� ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mal® Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation"' ❑Signature Confirmation 9590 9402 6415 0303 3696 97 0 Collect on p Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery 2. Article Number flYansfer from service label) 7015 1730 0000 1148 7670 Restricted Delivery Domestic Return Receipt PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 <. A. Sign r W Compl�tb items 1,2,and 3. _ � ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Receive by(P%riinnted Name) r C. D to of Delivery or on the front if space permits. `L� / 41) ll 'fX� . 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No ytiF Qe Zr:13R4JWSKX 'Po6 Boy, Hp12ro1 t a5 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® II III I I II( I III I II I I I II I I I) III II III ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MailTM 0 Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified MailO Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm 9590 9402 6415 0303 3696 73 ❑Collect on Delivery,, ❑Signature Confirmation 2. Article Number(Transfer fmm caniica la halt ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery di 7 015 1730 0000 1148 7 6 5 6 11 Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt ; ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Si ure ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X tt ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. c ive b named Peme) C, l`e f De very or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. delivery address different from item 1?, ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No Roi3eR i C7 1-5 Ra "A-35 7 Q%� kST 1A kR I V. 4 � 1 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® III III I I III I I III I II I I I I I I I I�I I III )II II ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MailT R ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mail® Delivery ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM 9590 9402 6415 0303 3696 80 ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery P. Article Number(transfer#rom service label) n ln��Arai Mail 7 015 1730 000.0 1148 7663 jil Restricted Delivery - - Domestic Return Receipt - PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Zurxzz?rr, Glenn Goldsmith, President Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President ��® Gym 2 54375 Route 25 Eric Sepenoski P.O. Box 1179 Liz Gillooly p Southold,NY 11971 Elizabeth Peeples Telephone 631 765-1892 > <<.= Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of DOUGLAS P. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST & DIANE E. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING DO NOT COMPLETE THIS FORM UNTIL THE POSTING HAS REMAINED IN PLACE FOR AT LEAST SEVENDAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE- COMPLETE THIS FORM ON EIGHTH DAY OR LATER J? Z11,- , residing at/dba /� Z/V/,>,# Z/YA/0 �� being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the ,(O day of A4nR r-l-/ , 2094, I personally posted the property known as by placing the Board of Trustees official noticing poster where it can easily be seen from the street, and that I have checked to be sure the noticing poster has remained in place for a full seven days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday, March 20, 2024. 1 Dated: i (s' ature) Sworn to before me this f/day ofjr4a v,AWA GINA A.LOCKE NOTARY PUBLIC,571 A E OF NEW YORK Registration No.01L06057960 Notary Public Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires Apr.30,20_./ ilUTILL= U '1= NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: DOUGLAS P. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST & DIANE E. ROBALINO LIVING TRUST SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING: For a Wetland Permit for the as-built 1,628sq.ft. one-story dwelling with attached 186sq.ft. east side deck with steps and 405sq.ft. west side deck with steps; as-built 181sq.ft. PVC pergola; as-built 345sq.ft. west side concrete patio; 526sq.ft. of as built concrete walkways; 827sq.ft. of as-built step-stone walks; as-built 598sq.ft. masonry block walk; as-built 1,600sq.ft. brick & asphalt driveway; existing previously permitted 1,380sq.ft. two-story garage; and 10' diameter by 8' deep cesspool with shallow dome. Located: 1695 Bay Avenue, East Marion. SCTM# 1000-31-9-21.1 TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 — at or about 5:30P.M. If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available online at www.southoldtownny.gov and/or in the Trustee Office until to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated. as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3: If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 3 - 09 - 2 f• PROJECT NAME DOU6, LNS The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate'response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan,subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license,certification: Nature and extent of action: 19P_— 60"Srgu j CX�S i 1�L� Re55 �MNeE wrTWo�`T i Re APPROVAL- ©r- 66NPF> otr `Tc->WI,3 Location of action: I �� p'� l�S�' ►�A�\ •Y 1 CI q Site acreage: ®• 51-3 AC-RS�S' Present land use: 1 �-� �A�`^ l L� ��LL%t'-� Present zoning classification: 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: J P`N``�S �' l"u C (b) Mailing address: L 1 o DR Lk (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) (v I ` 77 7— 1 l (d) Application number, if any: 1 " / t7 Will the action be directly undertaken,require Rending, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No V-31 If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LY4 P Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. XYes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable I Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No X Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria v" Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria , ❑ Yes ❑ No xNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ 0 Yes No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the.Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeO No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary ttiI Ir r WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No X Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. M Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—.Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable PREPARED BY e •. TITLE_ /t, R 61-11 T'15 G% DATE