Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-6.-1-5 (2)
���9' �+.-tc �--ram.... w � S \ 13 5�_., � . / /j/j i/�y'��,o� "�'� ) �y`1� I ��\ may, f •4--�'t G-�E•-I ( I,d-•T-�i�.. I-��_-,""'� � 2� 1 1 6., 24" DIA COVER MACRINE EST uN IJ O) , Z v I ' :-"' +w`L1 -t��� � �.. �.: •. ..••.• .••.; ., y-.•- `\ \ \\ \\ .. > \ n ❑ ❑ ou 0 o a o " T►of_1 !` o o ❑ n c� r❑ ❑ ❑ a (4) 8 DIA KNOCKOUTS --- _ p o ❑ ❑ o o cD o ❑ n \ t1tT5 of CLEARIN I I a ❑ o b o 0 00 a TO REMAIN) _ \ / L.r. II )- a� iq" OAK Q Q / v -. ! ( ram C> l,�-r---E+ 4 O PROP' ... > xrs-r'j�iare /� ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 ❑ o 7 t39 �� � / � I 0 // ti �` �� .^' ,3 r ,x � 1.,,: s•o I � 1; .•� i �'� J.!^+�...C�• L� 'r r, �— � __.---- t 'riJ 5 K.� ,�a DA-•f,:F„I / \ V. ✓ �•.,•.. �N-..-_ � y1 N 05'g3.00" r �,��\ ♦ /� �\� Qit J�G� �/ � ref(• �' ad J �. ' ' 7\ •O 'L4 9g 2. •b �� � �\ o .-✓ / ` { rt r ...." �G`�,%Gr" ,� ,i � �`� V u N / .E �8 os ra• \ ,rat P¢°Pyt�. 1 Q 28 S a'- o• + 4�` d�� KP DR TYPICAL SECTION + ' ` NOT TO SCALE �\ I .� a 0uW +tip " al,4•7' . ,� 8 -6 I. O yu 4" x 4" 12.5 j12.5 WIRE MESH 8� lLJ—%� �, �G-� ��`' �, '�� f` `r •� 6" x 6" 6 j6 WIRE MESH 7 -Tfu '� _j I(�II_ET VEN.__.Tom.— 25Y4� jj �. lam', Tc��3t✓� �>tG � tJ,c-- ,- fi''� '00"W .0 _I �j — (.�(6�-r t� 1 r� �ti 1 �r-r d ��� - -((,, S q0 (00 338 0 j. 1 L •-1 12/2 LIQUID LEVEL r7 \ 3" —CONCRETE BAFFELS m `` CONTINUOUS HOT I-1T�--`I �. T C �J ASPHALT SEAL-d C-amd_•- J-t1�t-=;L �- 8. l=s�r�r r�G� �1 t�_-T �i= L_.4T- '�•�.o `�'� ?'/� C17�5 I. 4" x 4" 12.5,l12.5 "T h�c..�,z-«=t�•s>='� L7.�.t [--�s� �- v. WIRE MESH 4I2 MINIMUM ►.. ���/- fZ� " 8'-4 SUBJEECt TO COVENANTS i RESTRICTIONS USER f PROVED By PAGE aoo GALLON O- �� t- ��. A ® SEPTIC TANK �.,�ts-- ��t�-„�� pPLANNING � • .� PNUTO. # F DIRECTIbN T®�y�� C1� SL7UT'H®LI' SUFIFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CROSS SECTION HKIWW , New York - j�Y, 1� ...... .......... NOT TO SCALE.E JUL101�pe 95 This N No ce"that the proposed - I awl for water soppy in the - >C)Li T_��, >{� With a total of -- — IOte wero OPPIM44d On the shave date. These faMes Md o ft_rn to 001118MADOW dandff& In Wed at the tune of constnrdton. This approval shah be vaMd only in the event said subdivtsion/devel- OP W9 I plRn Is duly Ned with the County Clerk WtNn---one year of Oft dam. Consent IS hereby QIVon for C the pfikQ of;this map on ,L1NE BEARING DISTANCE T which Us ondmunient Appsim In the,Oftk*of,the Cou Cilerk 1 S 8 4 3 6'0 0"W 58. 14 -7 In aor le with bf the=Publto 14"Law:wd the j-F�_gnr ED� 0 {-1 �' OG�►-7 �. ��•9Lo 2 S 14'�18'00"W 25.00 O �. 1 }� j fG '`Cod*. rc 1• lacJ9 d-a 510 C.c.l•a4-4-9. gO 3 S 7 4'20'01"W 25.76d",� .d.._CJ2'�' \.JG��"'� ...1 J• C..-�C..�� © �t.!. Ge.Zd•�• Z5 (,,i, 359G�.1 i 4 It 14. 18'00"E 31 .69 + r .� JC6EPHKMERiP.E.s . 1�C.,ltc.L"5'T�' 1-1t L.�Jt�� �-- � �L-.�.r�- � Dtnctor� Otviaion'i�ot Erndronnantal Gar �,►,d_.F�'.:�-t'-- �--E- , t..1 n-44 -I--,� r-�,� t=o re-- - I�r�-�`-r�t A �.�v,d.-�-.;�.�rL�•C��srr�vc-r,�r_t C��"J�.,�sv�•r�.�.�� , !=.t�c.�Ls-! i�•s t���..I c.� ,�-R--rr.�t<.1 t tom.-,,��3 t��`B�{T� I � .moo t'c�a ' r G�_.tz>�--r,r�,.�s 5r�--c- F-i�r�rs•-t`Ti-d��.r>-1 .�--►_.ram �► d i 1__f �.(�--� �� ( O 1 aF:NEB � 10L1�Z - l-1 Go�s .,- 1� -!C - r��l om � �1.d r t-=rc �°�4' P�� H,8T9o�� ram' vl�j c:D o C�.l A ® r yd Cnf�o►� �.c_rLu �_ �urt-�r� Cr�F-C_ r�a I��ul� �`o c _9'�CJ S�-t--- ' ADDITIONS f REV1SWNS' 21 SEPT 1952 o'\ � ",�_L c �6_T ccxl O� e�ov� -,rr r rs� C-n c�15 WATER LINES Z F E[3 1913 j 049 PATH LOCATIONS 31 AUG. 199A- LS 4is �i i�s�a+v��totit -I--14— L� .,� '`� ��v �ia..�. T,�,t'T�.-►>G FF]��t� C.��'-ti-a•� �t=l=-�+ � __ __ ���F �rz ds-�:e.- Gov ar r�E --gyp-,• - �:" , L t B �r_ 11 CsI t >�' 477 1. )VI I/9 4 95 t0V x t: ti PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o�0 GyG Richard G.Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. �. ® �� Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald ��� ��© Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 11, 1995 Stephen L Ham,lll, Esq. 45 Hampton Rd. Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Minor subdivision for John and Margaret Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 10, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated February 2, 1995. Conditional final approval was granted on June 12, 1995. All conditions have been fulfilled. Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed by the Chairman. The mylar maps, which were also endorsed by the Chairman, must be picked up at this office and filed in the office of the County Clerk. Any plat not so filed or recorded within sixty (60)'days of the date of final approval, shall become null and void. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the ,above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman enc. cc: Tax Assessors Building Department Ken Edwards r DECLARATION DECLARATION, made the l �^' day of November 1994, by JOHN S. GUEST and MARGARET H. GUEST, both now residing at 839 Weed Street, New Canaan, Connecticut, hereinafter referred to collectively as the Declarants. �s WHEREAS, the. Declarants are the owners of certain real property situate at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, as shown on the map entitled "Minor Subdivision Plan - Property of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest", prepared y Chandler, Palmer & King, dated December 4, 1989, revised 10 May 1990, 20 November 1990, 30 November 1990, 21 September 1992, 2 February 1993 and 31 August 1994 (the "Minor Subdivision- Map") , which Map is to be filed in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk, said real property being more particularly described on Schedule A hereto; and I� WHEREAS, the Declarants have made application to the (Planning Board of the Town of Southold and the New York State epartment of Environmental Conservation for approval of a minor subdivision as shown on the above referred to map 'to create three separate parcels shown as Lots ;1, 2 and 3 thereon, said Lots being ore particularly described on Schedules B, C and D hereto, respectively; and WHEREAS, depicted on the Minor Subdivision Map are shaded areas denoting limits of proposed buffers surrounding existing remains of historic structures and an existing archaeological find (the "buffer areas") and foot paths traversing Lot ' 2 and Lot 3 1 I (the "foot paths") ; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of said granting of approval, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation have deemed it to be in the best% interests of the Town of Southold and State of New York and the owners and prospective owners of said Lots that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said Lots, and as a condition of said approval, said Planning Board and Department of Environmental Conservation have required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk; and WHEREAS, the Declarants have considered the foregoing and determined that the same will be for the best interests of the Declarants and subsequent owners of said Lots; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarants, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed, do hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said Lots described on Schedule B, Sched ule C and Schedule D hereto shall hereinafter be subject to he following covenants which shall run 'with the land and shall be inding upon all purchasers '.- of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That no lot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning oard and that there shall be no further subdivision of any lot in perpetuity. 2 I t y ' 2 . That clearing and grading within each Lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Declarants and subsequent owners of the Lots shall be permitted to continue to trim vegetation on the Lots so as to preserve the views from their dwellings and otherwise to maintain the Lots in a neat and orderly manner so long as they do so in compliance with this Declaration and all State and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations then in effect. 3 . That no new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. I 4. That no stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its Lots shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 5. That all prospective owners of Lots within this subdivision are hereby advised that this subdivision is located ithin one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore may be objected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. 6. That there shall be no construction or ground isturbing activities conducted within the buffer areas except that the foot paths may continue to be used and kept open in their xisting locations by mowing, clearing or other means as necessary. 3 7. That the Magazine and Fire Control Station on Lot 2 as shown on the Minor Subdivision Map may continue to be used by the owner or owners of said Lot but that any physical alterations o such structures, other than those involving minor maintenance and repairs and replacement in kind of materials, shall require X he prior review and approval of the Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. 8. The covenants and restrictions set forth in Sections 1 through 5 of this Declaration can be modified only at the request of the .then owner of any of the Lots affected thereby, ith the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a .public hearing. Adjoining p g � fining property owners shall be entitled to notice of suc h public hearing, but their consent to such modifications shall not be required. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants above named have executed the foregoing Declaration as of the day and year first above written. S John/S. Guest y. t Margaret X. Guest 4 . ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss. : Au-) (�7nA&/1 COUNTY OF TCt lr-h d 6(- ) "` On the day of N -Cern67 19 14, before me personally appeared John S. Guest and Margaret H.. Guest, to me known and known to me to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Public PAYMCINSIMOIy 1 .. NOTARY PUBLIC° ( 1l "y COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH�31, 5 ,'• SCHEDULE A DESCRIPT_ION.MOF_._THE.. _EN..TIR_E_.G_U.ES_T _SU_BDIV,ISI0N A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon , - located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue , said point being located 6594 . 56 feet North of a point which is 3449 . 90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees , 36 minutes and 00 seconds West ' 58 . 14 feet along said avenue ,line .to. a monument ; thence South 14 degrees,, 18 minutes and 00 seconds West ._ 648 . 46 feet along the said Westerly 1`ine of Crescent . - A.venue to ' a monument ; . thence South 15 degrees , 39 'minutes and 54. seconds East ;492 . 94_ feet to a point ; thence South 74 degrees , .20 _ minutes :and ,01 second West about 339 feet to the high water line of Fishers .,1§1and Sound ; ..thence following the meanders .'of said high —water line in a general . Northwesterly and Northeasterly direction about 1980 ' feet to a point ; thence Due South about 230 feet to the - monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the point of beginning. The above described tract is subject to a right of way 25 . 00 feet in width , in favor of land now or formerly of Thomas W . Russell , Jr . which adjoins the above described tract on the South , said right of way being described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of of the Westerly line of -Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229 . 70 feet to" a point ; thence South 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 01 second West 103 . 88 feet to a point ; thence South 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds West 132 . 00 feet to a point ; thence South 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds East 86 . 09 feet to a monument ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 25 . 76 feet to 'a point ; thence .Nor.th 29 -degrees , .52 minutes and .00,_seconds West 87 . 96 ..feet . to a pont ,_ thence ;North 05_ .degrees ;. 53 minutes and- .:00- .seconds East . 148 . 06 -feet to a ;point ; thence North- 41 -degrees, 03 minutes and .00 seconds 'East298 . 41 .f-eet to'-"-a point ; thence '' North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and ` '55 :seconds .,West 1222 .90 feet to a -point ; thence North '14 . degrees , 18 : `. minutes and 00 ' seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point; ,thence South 75 ' degrees , `;:04 .minutes 'and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 ,feet to ;the Westerly ._ '.`l.ine of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 . seconds .West 25 . 00 feet along .said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . Together with a right of. way across land of James V . Righter , said .right of way is triangular in . shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . SCHhiiuLE .B - DESCRIPTION OF LOT 1 A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent -Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and ,-5,eodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and '54' seconds East 492 . 94 feet to a point;; thence South ' 74 degrees, 20 -mi-nutes and 01 second West 329 . 34 feet' to a monument ; thence continuing South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and' 01 second West about 10 feet to the high water line of . Fishers Isla' nd ,Sound; . thence Northwesterly about 480 -feet along -said high water -1ineproi.nt ; :thence South 84 degrees , 59 minutes sand 33 -seconds _ East :'_350 .`00 '.feet to a point; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 142 . 56 feet 'to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds . East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees, 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line. to the point of beginning . Containing 3 . 7 acres , more or less . Together with- a right of way across land of James V . Righter , s.aid right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , - said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96, feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 .13 feet 'to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North ,63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 -feet along .said .avenue line to the monument at .the point of be 74 The above described -tract is `subject-'to 'a right 'o'f way25 :'00 feet ==in - width ;' in favor of 1 and -now 'or for_merl,y of Thomas ' W . :Russell , Jr,: which adjoins the above :described .`tra'ct :-on ,the "South,°`;said .r.i,ght 'of way being described as followss ': Beginning at ,the point of beginning of..°'the -above described tract and running thence South 15 degrees ; 39 .minutes 'and `84 '-'seconds' East 229 . 70 feet to a point; thence South 41 'degrees , 03 :minutes and 01 second West 103 . 88 feet to ' a point; thence South '05 .degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds West 132 . 00 feet to a point ; " 'thence. South 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds -East .86 . 09 feet. ;to 'a monument ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes ''and '01 'second West'.-25 .76 1.,feet to a point; thence North 29 degrees , 52 ,minutes and 00 'seconds West w I 87 . 96 feet to a point ; thence North 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds East 148 . 06 feet to a point ; thence North 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 00 seconds East 98 . 41 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 222 . 90 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the Westerly, line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the point of beginning . Subject also to a right of way , for all purposes , in favor of the owners of Lot #2 over the existing driveway which crosses the above described tract running in a Southwesterly direction from the Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue . SCHEDULE C - DESCRIPTION OF LOT 2 A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon , located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue , said point being located 6240 . 25 feet North of a point which is 3596 . 71 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 263 . 46 feet along said avenue line to a point ; thence North 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds West 25 . 04 feet to a point ; thence South 14 degrees . 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds East 142 . 56 feet to a point ; thence North 84 degrees , 59 minutes and 33 seconds West 350 . 00 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northwesterly and Northeasterly about 810 feet along said high water line to a point ; thence South 18 degrees , 35 minutes and 17 seconds East about 240 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 41 minutes and 56 seconds East 360 . 00 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue and the point of beginning . Containing 5 . 7 acres , more or less . Together with a right of way for all purposes over the existing driveway which crosses Lot #1 . Together also with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . r 11`-Q7r64K1 SCL__JLE D - DESCRIPTION OF L0� J A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning, at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 6594 . 56 feet North of a point which is 3449 . 90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees , 36 minutes and 00 seconds West 58 . 14 feet along said avenue line to a monument ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 360 . 00 feet along the Westerly line of said Crescent Avenue to a point ; thence North 75 degrees , 41 minutes and 56 seconds West 360 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 18 degrees , 35 minutes and 17 seconds West about 240 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northeasterly about 690 feet following the meanders of said high water line to a point ; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the point of beginning . Containing 4 . 3 acres , more or less . Pr+ontE:852-2000 SUF- FOLK -COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE 1�5 Edward P. liomai Fig COUNTY CLLIiK .atvFm Enr,. Nf w voni< t t�o i Town of Southold Assessors ✓Town of Southold Planning Board Chief Deputy County Treasurer TO WHOM THIS MAY CONCERN __—�ubdivision ' The Set-0 Major Subdivision Map of: John �ues1- Was Filed: JL1 Iy z`f, 1995 SCTM#: 1000- File #: 97 I'7 Abstract #: 1 2--1 Township: Southold Hamlet: I—i s has 1 s la nd Owner: Some. Very truly yours, County Clef* Map Department 1 At, 101995 UTHINN nn No. 9 PL NN BOARD i. ir:elm MATTHEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHILLY B.MATTHEWS TELECOP=516-287-1076 (1912-1992) STEP=L.HAM,HI August 10, 1995 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5) Dear Board Members: Please be advised that mylars of the final map of the referenced minor subdivision were duly filed with the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk on July 24, 1995. I have enclosed a copy of the receipt for the map which was filed as Map No. 9717 (Abstract No. 12794) . Very truly yours, leU t4x,, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:cc Enclosure ll AUG I 1 1995 SOLiTj OLD�otNN PLANNING BOARD SUFFOLK COUNTY MAP DEPT. No. $252.4 ,s HOW PAID © / t3 MAIL PICK UP CASH I M.O. CHK.I OFF, CHRG eHNo R.A. COPIES D E S C R I P T 1 0 N CODE FEE FILE TOWN BOOK - PAGE. ow— go� pt.:A �. 'Ice io FORM NO.222 , o��SUFFD(,�co PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. 1�- P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 41- �� Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald ��l ��� Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MINUTES June 12, 1995 Present were: Richard G. Ward , Chairman Bennett Orlowski , Jr . G. Ritchie Latham Kenneth Edwards William Cremers Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Melissa Spiro, Planner Martha Jones , Secretary Absent: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Mr . Ward : Good evening . I ' d like to call the June 12 , 1995 Planning Board meeting to order . The first order of business , the setting of the next Planning Board meeting . Board to set Monday, July 10, 1995 at 7 : 30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall , Main Rd . , . Southold , as the time and place for the next regular Planning Board meeting. Is there a second? Mr . Orlowski : So moved . Mr . Cremers : Second . Mr . Ward : Moved and seconded . All in favor? Ayes : Mr . Orlowski , Mr . Latham, Mr .- Edwards , Mr . Cremers , Mr . Ward Mr . Ward : Opposed? Motion carried . Public Hearings Mr . Ward : John and Margaret Guest -- This minor subdivision is for 3 lots on 13 . 7 acres located on the west side of Crescent Ave . on Fishers Island . SCTM# 1000--6--1--5 . Is the agent or applicant here this evening, that would like to address the Board? If not , is there anyone present that would like to address the Board on this application . If not , all is in order to close the hearing . Mr . Cremers : I move to close the hearing . Mr . Orlowski : Second . Mr . Ward : Moved and seconded . All in favor? J 1 Southold Town Plan: g Board 2 June 12 , 1995 Ayes : Mr . Orlowski , Mr . Latham, Mr. Edwards , Mr . Cremers , Mr . Ward Mr . Ward : Opposed? Motion carried . What ' s the pleasure of the Board? Mr . Edwards: Mr . Chairman, I move that WHEREAS, John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest are the owners of the property known and designated as SCTM# 1000--6--1--5 located on the west side of Crescent Ave . on Fishers Island; and WHEREAS, this proposed minor subdivision is for 3 lots on 13 . 7 acres; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board , pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8) , Part 617 , declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on October 19, 1992; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall , Southold, New York on June 12 , 1995; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated February 2 , 1995 , subject to fulfillment of the following condition. The condition must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution. 1 . Six ( 6) final subdivision maps and two ( 2) mylars must be submitted . All maps must contain a valid stamp of approval from the Health Department . Mr . Latham: Second . Mr . Ward : Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes : Mr . Orlowski , Mr . Latham, Mr. Edwards , Mr. Cremers , Mr . Ward Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried . Mr . Ward: aret Best and Adl n S verson - Th' existing 1 . 3 acre parcel wit o dwellings is to be div into two lots , each having one of the dwe ngs . SCTM# 100 - 23--6--17 . What ' s the pleasure of the Board? Mr . Orlowski : I make a on to ho the hearing open until the applicant receives S olk County Departm of Health approval . Mr : Latham: second it . Mr . Ward : Motion seconded . All in favor? • � Ms J.Y.O. Consulting P.O. Box 447 Quogue, N.Y. 11959-0447 516-653-0607 June 22, 1995 Planning Department Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 RE: Application for Guest Subdivision, Fishers Island S.C.T.M.No. 1000-006-1-5 To whom it may concern: Enclosed please find the final subdivision prints and mylars which were recently stamped and signed by the S.C.D.H.S. As always, should you have any comments or questions regarding this project, please feel free to contact our office. Si r y, len E. Ju GEJ:ar J1J�� 2 8 1995 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD MS Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Gi )fin Ju s+ Subject: John + X la-15 Lra 6v-e.,01 SCTM#: 1000- 6- 1-S Comments: p r i nto _ 3 my lays — -F;nA-) 2 7 1995 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD 1 i PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman C Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr... .® P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark.S. McDonald Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 13, 1995 Stephen L. Ham, III, Esq. 45 Hampton Rd. Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Minor subdivision for John and Margaret Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 12, 1995: The final public hearing which was held at 7:30 p.m., was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest are the owners of the property known arid� designated as SCTM# 1000-6-1-5, located on the west side of Crescent Ave. on Fishers Island; and WHEREAS, this proposed minor subdivision is for 3 lots on 13.7 acres; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on October 19, 1992; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on June 12, 1995; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met, be it therefore STATE OF NEW VORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFO(I�11C ) of Mattituck, In said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOIX TIMES, a Weekly LEGAL NOTICE Newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Notice of Public Hearing Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 276 of the Town held by and that the •Notice of which the annexed Is a Law,a public hearing will the Southold Town Planning Board,at gl printed Copy, has been regularly pubiis ed in said the Town Hall,Main Road,Southold, Newspaper once each week for weeks new York in said Town on the 12th day of June, 1995 on the question of I successively, commencing on the _ day of the following:Filial I� 7:30 P.M. nal public hearing f the proposed minor subdivision for John and Margaret Guest,on Fishers Island,Town of Southold,County of Owe Suffolk, State of New York.-Suffolk CHRISTINA VOUNSKI �, County Tax Map Number 1t000-6-1-5. I Notary Public,State of New York - The property is bordered on the, NOin Sufi 84 ^� north by Fishers Island Sound;on the Qualified in Suffolk County (8 J�f'1J Principal Clerk northeast by land now or formerly ofl Commission Expires November 23,1 Stephen E. O'Neil; on the east by, s Crescent Ave.; the southeast U Cl)r&M by land now or formrm U.erly of James r Righter;on the south by land now or formerly of Thomas W. Russell,Jr.;l Notary Public and on the west by Fishers Island �L� SOUTHOLD WAN Sworn to ore me th pLANNING BOARD day of 19 /j5' MATTITEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 RAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHIUP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 (1012.1092) STEPHEN L.HAM,III May 18, 1995 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5) Dear Melissa: I have enclosed one print of the referenced minor subdivision map and one conformed copy of the Declaration, dated December 7, 1994 and recorded December 21, 1994 in Liber 11707 page 471. The recording information for that Declaration (as well as for a required Health Services Declaration) is set forth on the map. The enclosed print bears the approval of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. I will provide you with at least two mylars and six paper prints of the map and a check to the Town of Southold for the $4, 000 park and playground fee prior to June 12 . If you require any further information or documentation prior to the public hearing, please give me a call. Sincerely, t5,/ 4a4't' Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:cc Enclosure MAY 19 1995 �iOAp Page 2 Proposed minor subdivision for John and Margaret Guest June 13, 1995 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated February 2, 1995, subject to fulfillment of the following condition. The condition must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution. 1. Six (6) final subdivision maps and two (2) mylars must be sumitted. All maps must contain a valid stamp of approval from the Health Department. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward �.S Chairman enc. PUBLISHER'S CERTIFICATE State of Connecticut ) County of New London, ) ss. New London On this 6 day of June A.D. 1995, personally appeared before the undersigned, a Notary Public, within and for said County and State, J. L. Zielinski, Legal Advertising rep. LTown of Southold77 of THE DAY, a daily Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thataTon to L Pursuant Law a sec- lion 276 of the Tow newspaper published at New London, County of New public hearing will be held'by by the Southold Town Planning I Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the I New London State of Connecticut who beincy dui sworn 72ih tlay of June,1995 on the i i i i7 y i question of the following: 7:30 P.M. Final public hearing for the proposed mi- nor MargabeivisionforonoFsh�5 states on oath, that the Order of Notice in the case of Island, Town�t of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-6-5-1. Legal Adv. #317 The property is bordered on the north by Fishers Is- land Sound;on the northeast by land now or formerly of Stephen E. O'Neil; on the east by Crescent Ave.;onthe a true copy of which southeast by land noww or formerly of James U. Right- er;on the south by land now or formerly of Thomas W. Russell, Sondwest by Fishers Islandu . ; is hereunto annexed, was published in said newspaper in Dated:May.22,1995 By Order of The Southold Town Planning Board 1 Richard G.Ward,Chairman its issues of the s days of June A.D. 19 95 d'Y", �0 Subscribed and sworn to beforg e this 6 day of June A.D. 1995 yN, 1 2 1995 Notary Public. $0 NHOLD NG BW16D MATTHEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PmT.T B.MATTHEWS TELEGOPIER 516-287-1076 (1912-1092) STEPHEN L.HAM,III June 7, 1995 Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest Gh�� (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5) in Dear Board Members: drawerL- In connection with the final public hearing on the referenced subdivision application that is now scheduled for June 12, I have enclosed my clients' check to the Town of Southold for $4, 000 in payment of the park and playground fee. I expect to have mylars and paper prints of the final subdivision map, bearing the endorsement of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, delivered to you prior to the hearing. Please advise me when the mylars have been endorsed so that I can arrange for the filing of the map with the Suffolk County Clerk. Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:cc Enclosure M � P t BOXES 5-TIIRU 9 MUST BE TYPED O UNTED IN J!LACK INK ONLY Pia t TO RE,CORDING;OR FILING. >]i. 1Li TI` , ►, t' �,x rOLK.COUNTY CLERK'i' '2, ,' s' ►� r Y,.- h VE Ci N Numbers of pages lo ToRKENS J _ Serial# .....,..: C—;I CR7CID _.- .. Certificate# Cr. , i Deed/Mortgage Instrument Deed/Mortgage Tax Stamp Recording/Filing Stamps 4 F i Es Page/Filing Fee 3 Mortgage Amt..- Handling -� 1.Basic Tax TP-584 2.SONYMA Notation Sub Total EA-5217(County) Sub Total 3.Spec./Add. • EA-5217(State) TOT.MTG.TAX R.P,T.S.A. � �9 a Dual Town Dual County Held for Apportionment Comm.of Ed. _ M Transfer Tax Affidavit �kD IN �v Mansion Tax Certified Copy The property covered by this mortgage is or will be improved by a one or two Reg:Copy _ Sub Total �p family dwelling only. YES or-NO /Olher �L , .r,, , GRAND TOTAL If NO,see appropriate tax clause on page# of this instrument. PRop Real Property Tax Service Agency Verification ` ''>':} Title Com an information Dist Section Block Lot loon r.. oo6 .'oo 01. 00 005 . 000 >a �. Company Name' Dal Title Number FEE PAID BY:. Cash Check X Charge Stephen L. Ham, III, Es q: ' Matthews & Ham Payer same as R&R_ 45 Hampton Road 'Southampton, NY 11968 OR: RECORD &RE,E,TURN;TO: .::` SuffoRi-.County Recording & Endorsement Page This page forms part of the attached DECLARATION ,.made. by: (Deed, Mortgage, etc.) _JOHN S . GUEST and MARGARET H. nyF-,T The premises herein is situated in svrrOLK COUNTY,NEW YOWL T ! In the TOWN of SOUTHOLD q .MAY � g �9�� �k i In the YiS.LAGl'; . b o 1L", orIiAMLETof FISHERS IST,At�Tn �r.. - y .., .. nx..*.mom-.,-�•�,a ent 6T6�t'41 Yl Tt1.9+E11 6 12-0104..5/91 o��gUFFO(,�coG PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. 0 P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. iJi �� Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald O,( �a0 Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1.938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 19, 1995 Stephen Ham, III, Esq. 45 Hampton Rd. Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for John & Margaret Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Thursday, May 18, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, June 12, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated February 2, 1995. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, r Richard G. Ward Chairman MAY-18-1995 18t27 MATTHEWS & HAhI P.01 -' �T�22I�ZYS LC H.��.�5 • Joe t�inosa-F':s a.�a CCUITM LLO13S.i2 LAZV /MS 45 143PTON ROAD SoIIzs.a.y4TON,h.Y.319G8 818.28Q•Q4CQ TZLECO2=2 33a-2aT•lc?o FAS TRANSMISSION Srss�L g.�Y.1II To: FAX 07 to t-' - 3 I- Phone # From: Stephen L. Fam, III Date: —�— Re: Number of pages (including this page) if all pages are not received, call (516) 283-2400. - �iESSAG�: ------------------ MAY I g 1995 SOUTH:"1 0 TG:n'EV W�diuliildu BOHftG •MAY-1$-1995 10:28 MATTHEWS '& HAM P.02 �„•."Tcr•r—d.,i-�, �'t`�� bra c c...r i��-- �. I�.'1 �-J�-�. . . ( H�r�,. 'f. �� rT 1 ter. 73E-=!. L4r-i�J � -G�.��s ,.r�tt�.1C "• _ PHOTO. E DIRECTION `�~�•y'�� ��rrtOt-13 �.r.'1�f.�c�I• Ida ! ADD•.•TIONS f REVISIONS' Z I SEPT 199� if VATER LINES Z DEB. 1113 PATH LOCATIONS 31 AUG. 1994 MAY-18-199E 10:=8-1 MATTHEW19 HAM F.O-- . . -79 svimr~:,ro covfA 215"WT1oNS Uall PAGE�- id dtCt 9t tti�it�10�oor t to vow it dw owd sW wA ditft IdwwF d tm Coal CN Ac arf m ON 7m d �pim is�rpie ,t t-e hereby Om for r* wo of of b crop 46 �� d ofPIAM 1 Low t ri NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Dale: 1 1/30/94 lei< JOHN S & MARGARET GUEST 839 WEED ST. NEW CANAAN, CT 06840 APPLICATION ID: 1-4738-00213/00002-0 PERMITS APPLIED FOR: 1 ARTICLE 25: TIDAL WETLANDS 1 ARTICLE 24: FRESHWATER WETLANDS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN SOUTHOLD IN SUFFOLK COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE SUBDIVISION OF ONE 13.7 ACRE LOT IN TO THREE LOTS. LOT 1 : 3.7 ACRES, LOT 2: 5.7 ACRES, LOT 3: 4.3 ACRES. SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS WITH DRIVEWAYS AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS ARE PROPOSED FOR LOTS 1 & 3. A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING EXISTS ON LOT 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION WILL BE MORE THAN 100 LINEAR FEET FROM NYSDEC REGULATED FRESHWATER WETLANDS. DEEDED BUFFER AREAS HAVE BEEN CREATED TO PROTECT EXISTING HISTORIC AND ARCHAELOGICAL SITES. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WEST OF CRESENT AVE, FISHERS ISLAND, SCTM 1000-6-1-5. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW(SEAR)DETERMINATION: SEQR - 2 Project is a Type I action and will not have a significant effect on the environment. A coordinated review with other agencies was performed and a Negative Declaration is on file. SEQR LEAD AGENCY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT(SHPA)DETERMINATION: SHPA - 4 A cultural resources survey has been completed. Based on information provided in the survey report, the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation has determined that the proposed activity will have no impact on registered or eligible archaeological sites or historic structures. No further review in accordance with SHPA is required. AVAILABILfTY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT: CONTACT PERSON Comments on this project must be SUSAN V ACKERMAN submitted in writing to the Contact SUNY CAMPUS, BLDG 40, ROOM 219 Person no later than 12/29/94 STONY BROOK, NY 11790-2356 (516) 444-0366 TO THE APPLICANT: i. THIS IS NOT A PERMIT 2. This is lit advise you that your aly,licauon Is cornplule and it rt:vtuvr h,rs currumrmced Additional iulunnnunn may Ixe cocpu:ste d from you at a future dale,if deemed necessary,trt order to n;ach it decision on your applicalien. 3. Your project is classified MAJOR Accordingly.it decision will bit!madr:witlim go days of the dale of this Notice. II a public hearing is necessary,you will he notified within 60 days and the hearing will commence within 90 clays of the date of Ihis notice. It a hearing is held, the final decision will be made within 60 days alter the hearing is cornplewd. " 4. Publication of this Notice in a newspalter is required.Consull the accornlurnying Instructions for Nowspaper Publicaliun. aTf ;. A DEC 21994. : CC:Chief EXOGLAIVe Olf c;Lr_ b tl --I k I Envitonmenial Notice Bulletin Yj File 11 tt_ v = -� — .5V IYiU J?`it!'��i`9 D PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman . Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham Jr. `�v ti P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Rr. - Southold, New York 11971 Mark S.McDonald 1 rs?� s Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards �`t _; z Telephone(516)765-1938 i • PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHO'LD. November 15, 1994 Stephen Ham, III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Rd. Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for John & Margaret Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 14, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from November 30, 1994 to May 30, 1995. Conditional sketch approval was granted on December 17, 1990. The Planning Board has granted this extension due to the delays caused by the requirements of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for a Stage II Cultural Resource Survey. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, - a Richard G. Ward ryv� Chairman 'u -P3 MATTHEWS 8C HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PH=B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 (1912-19921 STEPHEN L.HAM,III October 31, 1994 Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 3.1971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5) Dear Board Members: Sketch plan approval for the referenced minor subdivision expires on November 30, 1994. As you are aware, we have finally settled all outstanding issues with NYSDEC relating to its permit and that agency has approved the form of the proposed Declaration I sent to you earlier this month. However, the NYSDEC permit is not yet in hand and, consequently, we are not in a position to obtain the approval of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services at this time. Because it is quite possible that we will not have all the requisite permits in time to submit final maps to you by November 30, 1994, I request that you grant a further extension of your sketch plan approval for this subdivision to May 31, 1995. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III NOW 11994 sar�rl�;�!u rr Lv PLANPIJINC B"AR OCT-17-1994 11:24 MATTHEWS & HAM P.02 A ,ems a New York State Office of Paris,Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau �j rs w tows swe Peebles island,PO Box 180,Waterford,Now York 12188-0189 518-237-SM Joan K Davidson Co�mr.'salov�er October 14, 1994 Stephen L. Eam' III, Esq. Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York .11968 Dear Mr. Ham: Re: DEC 1-4738-00213/2-0 Guest 3 Lot Subdivision Southold, Suffolk County 92PR2345 Thank you for your letter of October 5th, by which you submitted to the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) review of the Declaration incorporating OPRHP recommended covenants and restrictions regarding historic resources on the Guest property. It is the OPRHP's opinion that Paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Declaration adequately provide for the protection of these historic resources. By copy of this letter, NYS DEC is notified of our acceptance of these provisions. If you have any questions or comments on this matter, please contact me at (518) 237-8643, ext. 280. 7ame erely, s Warren Program Analyst Field Services Bureau JPW:cm cc: Susan Ackerman DEC DRA-1IJ sl Off 11994 SOUTHOLD iOV;IN PLANNING BOARD An Equal oppc"1y/Afrdmv&9 Acdon AgerW �vK•a on nereNe o.ow TOTAL P.02 MATTHEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHu.IP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 (1912.19921 STEPHEN L.HAM,III October 5, 1994 Planning Board Town of Southold OCT 6!1994 Main Road Southold NY 11971 ' SOUT1101-D TUM PL�INPdl��G BOARD Attention: Melissa Spiro "ANNUAL`OARD Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest at Fishers Island (SCTM# 1000-6-1-5) Dear Melissa: We have finally worked out all outstanding issues with NYSDEC and the OPRHP relating to the referenced minor subdivision, subject to their approval. of the enclosed proposed Declaration. Since a Stage II Survey was conducted at the site, I have eliminated language as to an archaeologist being present at the time of any excavation and having a Stage II Survey conducted in the future at the time of application for a building permit, compromises that were rejected by NYSDEC anyway. Paragraphs 1-5 of the Declaration contain the other covenants and restrictions the Planning Board required. You will note from correspondence sent to you this past summer that nothing of significance was found on Lot 1 or in the proposed building area of Lot 3 . Paragraphs 6 and 7 address the concerns of NYSDEC and the OPRHP with respect to historic and pre-historic artifacts on Lots 2 and 3. A print of the most recently revised map (August 31, 1994) showing the foot paths and proposed buffer areas is also enclosed. Please review the enclosed Declaration with the Town Attorney and the Planning Board and give me a call with any comments. I will let you know if NYSDEC requires any modifications to Paragraphs 6 and 7. Sincerely, - Stephen L. Ham, III Enclosures O4. DECLARATION CT 61199 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD DECLARATION, made the day of October, 1994, by JOHN S. GUEST and MARGARET H. GUEST, both now residing at 839 Weed Street, New Canaan, Connecticut, hereinafter referred to collectively as the Declarants. WHEREAS, the Declarants are the owners of certain real property situate at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, as shown on the map entitled "Minor Subdivision Plan - Property of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest", prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King, dated December 4, 1989, revised 10 May 1990, 20 November 1990, 30 November 1990, 21 September 1992, 2 February 1993 and 31 August 1994 (the "Minor Subdivision Map") , which Map is to be filed in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk, said real property being more particularly described on Schedule A hereto; and WHEREAS, the Declarants have made application to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for approval of a minor subdivision as shown on the above referred to map to create three separate parcels shown as Lots 1, 2 and 3 thereon, said Lots being more particularly described on Schedules B, C and D hereto, respectively; and WHEREAS, depicted on the Minor Subdivision Map are shaded areas denoting limits of proposed buffers surrounding existing remains of historic structures and an existing archaeological find (the "buffer areas") and foot paths traversing Lot 2 and Lot 3 1 (the "foot paths") ; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of said granting of approval, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation have deemed it to be in the best interests of the Town of Southold and State of New York and the owners and prospective owners of said Lots that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said Lots, and as a condition of said approval, said Planning Board and Department of Environmental Conservation have required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk; and WHEREAS, the Declarants have considered the foregoing and determined that the same will be for the best interests of the Declarants and subsequent owners of said Lots; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarants, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed, do hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said Lots described on Schedule B, Schedule C and Schedule D hereto shall hereinafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That no lot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board and that there shall be no further subdivision of any lot in perpetuity. 2 2. That clearing and grading within each Lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Declarants and subsequent owners of the Lots shall be permitted to continue to trim vegetation on the Lots so as to preserve the views from their dwellings and otherwise to maintain the Lots in a neat and orderly manner so long as they do so in compliance with this Declaration and all State and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations then in effect. 3 . That no new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. 4. That no stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its Lots shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 5. That all prospective owners of Lots within this subdivision are hereby advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. 6. That there shall be no construction or ground disturbing activities conducted within the buffer areas except that the foot paths may continue to be used and kept open in their existing locations by mowing, clearing or other means as necessary. 3 7. That the Magazine and Fire Control Station on Lot 2 as shown on the Minor Subdivision Map may continue to be used by the owner or owners of said Lot but that any physical alterations to such structures, other than those involving minor maintenance and repairs and replacement in kind of materials, shall require the prior review and approval of the Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants above named have executed the foregoing Declaration as of the day and year first above written. John S. Guest Margaret H. Guest STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss. . COUNTY OF ) On the day of October, 1994, before me personally appeared John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest, to me known and known to me to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Public 4 SCHEDULE A D.E_S_C_R._I._P_r._7_a.N....._Q_F_..._T_H_E....._E.M.T_I._R E...._G..u_E_5.r....._S_U..B.P._r._V._I.S._z_0JN A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon , located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue , said point being located 6594 . 56 feet North of a point which is 3449 . 90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees , 36 minutes and 00 seconds West 58 . 14 feet along said avenue line to a monument ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 648 . 46 feet along the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue to a monument ; thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 492 . 94 feet to a point ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West about 339 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence following the meanders of said high water line in a general Northwesterly and Northeasterly direction about 1980 feet to a point ; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the point of beginning . The above described tract is subject to a right of way 25 . 00 feet in width , in favor of land now or formerly of Thomas W . Russell , Jr . which adjoins the above described tract on the South , said right of way being described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229 . 70 feet to a point ; thence South 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 01 second West 103 . 88 feet to a point ; thence South 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds West 132 . 00 feet to a point ; thence South 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds East 86 . 09 feet to a monument ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 25 . 76 feet to a point ; thence North 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds West 87 . 96 feet to. a point ; thence North 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds East 148 . 06 feet to a point , thence North 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 00 seconds East 98 . 41 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 222 . 90 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . Together with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey. Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . SCHE ,E B - DESCRIPTION OF LOT A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent •Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 492 . 94 feet to a point ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 329 . 34 feet to a monument ; thence continuing South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West about 10 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northwesterly about 480 feet along said high water line to a point ; thence South 84 degrees , 59 minutes and 33 seconds East 350 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 142 . 56 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet .to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the point of beginning . Containing 3 . 7 acres , more or less . Together with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . The above described tract is subject to a right of way 25 . 00 feet in width , in favor of land now or formerly of Thomas W . Russell , Jr . which adjoins the above described tract on the South , said right of way being described as follows : Beginning at the point of beginning of the above described tract and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229 . 70 feet to a point ; thence South 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 01 second West 103 . 88 feet to a point ; thence South 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds West 132 . 00 feet to a point ; thence South 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds East 86 . 09 feet to a monument ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 25 . 76 feet to a point ; thence North 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds West 87 . 96 feet to a point ; thence North 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds East 148 . 06 feet to a point ; thence North 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 00 seconds East 98 . 41 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 222 . 90 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the point of beginning . Subject also to a right of way , for all purposes , in favor of the owners of Lot #2 over the existing driveway which crosses the above described tract running in a Southwesterly direction from the Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue . SCHEDULE C - DESCRIPTION OF LOT 2 A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon , located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue , said point being located 6240 . 25 feet North of a point which is 3596 . 71 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 263 . 46 feet along said avenue line to a point ; thence North 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds West 25 . 04 feet to a point ; thence South 14 degrees . 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds East 142 . 56 feet to a point ; thence North 84 degrees , 59 minutes and 33 seconds West 350 . 00 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northwesterly and Northeasterly about 810 feet along said high water line to a point ; thence South 18 degrees , 35 minutes and 17 seconds East about 240 Feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 41 minutes and 56 seconds East 360 . 00 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue and the point of beginning,. Containing 5 . 7 acres , more or less . Together with a right of way for all purposes over the existing driveway which crosses Lot #1 . Together also with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 de-grees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . SCH ILE D - DESCRIPTION OF LO' A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 6594 . 56 feet North of a point which is 3449 . 90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees , 36 minutes and 00 seconds West 58 . 14 feet along said avenue line to a monument ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 360 . 00 feet along the Westerly line of said Crescent Avenue to a point ; thence North 75 degrees , 41 minutes and 56 seconds West 360 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 18 degrees , 35 minutes and 17 seconds West about 240 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northeasterly about 690 feet following the meanders of said high water line to a point ; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the point of beginning . Containing 4 . 3 acres , more or less . sj PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS "qy✓ Richard G.Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Mark S. McDonald '� ' '`` Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 23, 1994 Stephen L. Ham, III Matthews and Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, NY 11968 i Re: Proposed minor subdivision for John and Margaret Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 22, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval, retro-active from May 30, 1994, to November 30, 1994. The Planning Board has granted this extension due to the delays caused by the - - - requirements of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for a State II Cultural Resource Survey. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman MATTIMWS & HAM 45 ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Ms 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHii,P B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 "912-1992) July 13 , 1994 STEPHEN L.HAM,III -- g Board Planning Town of Southold Main Road JUL 1 ,41994 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdvision for SOUTHOLD70WN PLANNING BOARD John and Margaret Gue (SCTM No. 1000-6-1-5) Dear Board Members: I recently discovered that the latest extension of sketch plan approval for the referenced minor subdivision expired on May 30, 1994 . I had not requested a further extension. .. I am writing to request such an extension (as of May 30, 1994 if necessary) to allow us to proceed with the application. We have continued to pursue this matter with all due diligence and the reasons for the delays are beyond our control. As you are aware, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, at the behest of the State office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, required that a Stage II Cultural Resources Survey be performed at the site. Such a Survey was conducted in the fall of 1993 and the report was delivered in December of that year. A copy was furnished to NYSDEC at that time and, in January 1994, we received a request for an additional copy. Under cover of a letter dated January 28, 1994, I sent an additional copy of the Survey to George Hammarth of NYSDEC with the request that review and comment be made as soon as possible. A copy of that letter is enclosed. By letter of March 30, 1994 to Glenn Just (copy enclosed) , NYSDEC finally gave us its comments which I passed along to Mr. Guest by letter of April 7, 1994 (copy enclosed) . I arranged with the surveyor and archaeologist to have the historical and pre-historical areas of interest located on a new plan. This was accomplished after they returned to the site in mid-April. I received the revised plan in early May. A copy of the surveyor's transmittal letter is enclosed. Upon receipt of the revised plan I arranged with Glenn Just for a face-to-face meeting with Susan Ackerman, the analyst at NYSDEC responsible for reviewing this project. That meeting Planning Board Page 2 July 13, 1994 was held on May 11, 1994. We resolved most, but not all outstanding issues. Mrs. Ackerman told us she had to consult with the OHRHP with respect to those matters about which we had requested clarification or relief. Twelve days after our meeting Mrs. Ackerman sent the OHRHP a letter (copy enclosed) requesting advice on certain issues. By letter of June 17, 1994 (copy enclosed) the OHRHP responded to Mrs. Ackerman. I did not receive a copy of that response until it was faxed to me on July 8, 1994. I have since arranged with the surveyor for yet further revisions to the plan to reflect the agreed upon conservation measures and I am currently working on the language for a proposed Declaration to incorporate NYSDEC's requirements. I trust you will agree that the delays relating to this application have resulted entirely from circumstances beyond our control. Every time a new requirement has been recommended, we have responded with appropriate speed to move the process along expeditiously. Accordingly, in the interest of fairness, I urge you to grant a further extension of sketch plan approval to at least November 30, 1994. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yo urs, Stephen L. Ham, III Enclosures X&TTHEWTS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND GOUNS=ORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 518-283-2400 Pn=B.MATTHEw5 TELECOPIE$516-287-1076 ueie-ioaa STEPMW L HAM,III January 28, 1994 Mr. George W. Hammarth NYS Department of Environmental Conservation SUNY - Building 40 Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Re: Application No. 1-4738-00213/00002-0 John and Margaret Guest Dear Mr. Hammarth: At the request of Glenn Just, I am transmitting herewith an additional copy of the Stage II Cultural Resources Survey prepared by John Pfeiffer for John and Margaret Guest in connection with the referenced application. The subdivision process has dragged on for quite some time now so your prompt review of and comment on the Survey and application would be most appreciated. If you require any additional information or documentation, please let me know immediately. Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III Enclosure New York State Df�partnlent of 61dronnlental Conse"Yatlon Building 40---SUNY, Stony Brook, Ne.1V York 11790-2356 (516) 444-0365. FAX (516) 444-0373 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner March 30, 3.994 Glenn Just JMO Consulting , JUL 14 19°4 P.O.Box 447 Quogue, N.Y. 11959 SOIf'fHOLD TOWN RE: . Guest, Fishers Island PLANNING BOARD 1-4738-00213/00002--0 Dear Mr. Just: i The Department has reviewed the Stage II cultura.l Resources Survey prepared by John Pfeiffer, and has received comments on this survey from NYSQPRHP Historic Preservation .Field Service Bureau. Based on this review, the Depar�t:mezi- has the following comments: Lot #1. NYSOPRHP•has determined that resources on this . site are not eligible for inclusion in the State &National c Places, therefore no restrictions Registers of Histori or modifications are required on tjis pr' oposed lot. Lot #2 . - Battery Hack_leman and Associated structures are eligible for inclusion in the State &! National Registers of Historic Places. Beciause of the importance of .this resource the Department requires that -a coriservatio-h easement be granted on this parcel '(with ' a 50 foot buffer ..around all .resources) . Lot #3 : Portions ..of Battery Hackleman ex�st .on this lot. In addition,'.`OPRIiP,=has determined hat; the prehistoric .: archeological site on this, loi. is .eligible for inclusion 1n the., State : & National Registers of Historic Places. (see attached) The. I)epar`tm ht, requires that i. both Battery Hackleman 'and the p�-eb.�,�toric site :be protected by a -conservation easement ; (with a 50 foot buffer) . It appears ;that the prdposed property::line and/or building envelope may need.;t.o ;be revised in :order to grovide' the required. :protction of resources. If some or. all of the Battery Hac)C].eman resources on ` { this lot can not- be :avoided through project redesign, A pr1r,eA qn recycled paper .. 1 i (2 , f OPRHP recommends data recovery of .these remains :through, ' ma pping, `recordation _and Atcheologir'al excavation, after which demolition ,would be permitted. Please submit 4 copies.- of a revised plan with conservation easements clearly labeled and any other. necessary changes. In addition, please forward copy of 'the "Grant of Conservation Easement's to my attention. { If you have questions co ncerning ,this matter, please contact me. Sincerely, t i1 Susan .Ackerman En.viroiimentetl Analyst I SA:jr cc: S. Ham File - j i RE EVALUATION DATE: 2_/2_f 94 ISTAFF: R. Kuhn r i PROPERTY: Guest SUtr�Uvj!Lion s_Lte biCG: _Southold ADDRESS: _ - - — COU7IPM:_ Suffolk PROJECT IRREF: 92PF��,�5� USNN: AI0310. 001238 NR REF 2 survey REV:, I. Proper i s individually listed ion: sit/NRi name of-listing Property is .a contributing componnrit of a SR/NR district: name of district II . X Property meets criteria * D. for inclusion in tha National/State Register of Fi.istariC:. Places. Property Contributes to -a districti' which meets criteria j for inclusion 'in the National'/State Register`,of Histric Places.post ;SRkI; SFf3 .date UR Application pending '. j * Criteria for znclueicn in the Vational Regisi.ter A Associated with events that. have ,made a significant contribution to the broad patterns a£ :our history- B. Associated with the lives of persons significant '.in our. past; C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of Construotion; 6r rC�presents the work of a master; or possess high artistic .values; or represents a significant and distinguishable .entity. whose comporients may lack individual distinction; D. Have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or historyi SWATEMENT OF SIGNIFXCANCE: The. Guest Subdivisign archeolo i.ahly intact; . . rt}fact-rich brehistor a to %that a22A_Lr :Lto ' date `.tci',theLate W.ogdland _Period. The:"s to - contains varied 'artifact- assembla4 • Af.-s,•t�one tools "trnd. lithi debris ae ►s'.� 1 "as =prehietbr r ce;"_L-InIcs . The ceramics and of r Leva na pro ctile point ' eugagst tags 2 testing at -t 'te lso varif a ithe`` tenceLof_a in act feature that probdbly served a116t6raae A"ggvery of charred inai.'&d ,remains—An th* ;-164ttlis eyidgih es `the I very high degree af�ntearity that -thesi el�el�pbsses�esl" atic� also enb nc .,q the s les sianificance ' ! �Q ent l to viel� information pf s nif;icafi�ie to a 'Ihijiibdt 'of k �e earc}� c�uesti� �.n_cludi cr 'the 'etuavry "htit�ult re on Tag 2sland and the aettiement patter o � lWoodl nd Periodic-ites on ,iier.s Island. !, 1 USOURCE EVALMAT_Mi DATE:2/9/ I . STAFF: R. Kuhn PROPERTY:_t' _ _ Ba te'ry Eiack�leman 24CD: Southold ADDRESS: COUNTY:, , Suffolk PROJECT REF:- 92kR�345 USN:_, k 0.310.001239. NR REF: Survey REF• is Property is individually listed on SR/NR: l name of listing Property . is a contributing component of: A SR/NR _district name of district ' . Ix . X Property'. . meets criteria � A; c, Dom' for;' inclusion in the, � National/, a, Ra istsr of Historld Places: i Property contributes to a district which. meet 'criteria'. for inclusion in the Nationai/State Register , of ffIstr.ic Plac.6s.Post ,SRB SRB daf.i�T } NR Application VIending r . +� Criteria for Inclusion in the : 9'a1:li'ohaI It ji3ter . a1 Associated with events'.that have .made a significant I . contribution to the broad pitterbs of our history; I s7. Assoc'lated with the lives of peraoris',:Significiint in our { past; C. Embodies the distinctive charac:teri st:ics of a 'type, period. or method of construction; c :�' represents :the E work of a master; or possess high artistic values; 'or represents a significant and disi.irguishable entity whose components may lack individuCl' di.stinotion-, D. Have yielded, or may be likely th 'yie' ld information important in prehistory or history.: STATEMENT Off' . SIGNIFICANCE: .I . tery Hacklem n�,- •co, structred in 19 >,_ .s an Kist ric arc 3 tectural,ly,And a.rcheoloai�k11Yi sn, Lic:ant world war Ii era resource that recalls the coastal defenses Ifcolistructed during '.the gayly _wag effort. The resource in des theprinciAa 1 G�ncrete gazine wo .anti etirgj�aft 'gun enrol c:emerits�tl a 'machine t`gun nest.-, �n „�)seryation -and_gun ;,control �point Viand lltiLu�i7 'Tama ris - € and .unitary .f r ,lity. .a bar ticks '!Arid water $na :drainage Gain '_�o> n1F}tY evidg.�, souaeSts at "here_ may_ },iave 'been "earlier fortifications t hi's ".eosition,?!_ptSssibly' as _QSUAted Stith `the First world war , !ga Amy 'H�rklema.n ' is; t►isto ca 1Iv sni f icant because it e'tane L :the largest and most.- World war 1.1 coastal :fc tit cations 'ofi' eastern Lon .Island. The ]4vout o t�e instal l a 'on�l construction of tie. LIt�GaZinCa .' cxun eign1acements ,_ and_' ''a,�}�7„ ]a ;t .- atC 'l 1tI 5 = a're+ � chitepturally s, g i c-j2t as 'an tant 'exajttipl _'of i Wor d Wax �Ii i q�'$ ],itary facilities ]3�truction �3leiit►ver ran 'cha 'acter tS and ruinous cgit ton `o the Tiih II-f ilit 6,-I!,,AhdicateI j at cheoloajga�l work rQuld _elso viel 5alligant ' inYQrinatf�n' t on tile original layout. A Ai_n. and featiure Lof: ,the in tall#tion. ..,. ._ '., in t ^ _ ._.•�_ ._ .__.� _.:-�._._- ' .-..:__... .. ._.,..-_ _ ...emu'_ - .., ,--.. ,.._.._.....-�te- ...,........ MATTHEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND GOUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 r 516-283-2400 PHrrjpH.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 uoialoaa� . STEPHEN L HAx,III April 7, '"199 Mr. John S. Guest '839 Weed Street New Canaan, CT 06840 . Re: Minor Subdivision of .Premises at Fishers Island Dear John: At long last we have received a response from the DEC with -regard to the further archaeological work performed at your property by John Pfeiffer. I have enclosed a copy of Susan Ackerman's letter to Glenn Just of March 30, 1994. It is impossible ...= to determine the impact 'of the requested conservation easements from the information .now 'available. Accordingly, I have spoken .to both Dick Strouse .and John Pfeiffer and they will,'.arrange to meet at the site so, that the - easements can be properly located on the minor subdivision plan and -we can determine the impact, if any, on the available building areas. Dick would like to visit the property as soon as possible before the vegetation gets heavier. After the proposed ',"easements are located -on the plan, we -can discuss your .,options , concerning the 'DEC's requirements. in ,the ::'meantime, if ,you have any questions ,or comments, 'please - Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III -.Enclosure `John Pfeiffer.;(w/ enclosure) e»®ems' C _ f-Y i4 :�Kj D L E '.R , P A L M\'E R . & K 1 N G �. Architecture, Engineering and Surveying RICHARD H. STROUSE;P.E., L.S.: ,Charles.E.Chandler.(1878.1929) Shepard B.Palmer(1884'-1943 'GORDON.C.'HYDE"A.I.A. - ': e ) Benjamin k.Palmier(1923-1972) Shepard B.Palmer Jr.(1939.1978) Percy Jae King,(1959.1989), " April :29.; ,1994 Stephen, Ham`IIi ,"Esq. 45 `,Hampton Road Southampton; NY 119.68 . RE. Guest Subdivision Fishers' Isl.and, NY Dear ::St"eve c We havetilocated..,.the items mentioned'in Dr. . Pfeiffer" s :report and have plotted them- on:-.our sub division ',map I ave. .added "in ',red :on. _the enclosed prints: proposed areas ,:to .be .:rest:ricte.d .because of. the -hstorical .,it,ems I , have ,riot ..always-maintained the 50 . foot. .buffer suggested, nor do I ...show. a restricted '.area- .around - the -concrete .foundation of the bath.,".house; - :but ,have _:tried _,'to show ..reasonable ,areas necessary . - y to,. . ., protect.'the aignif cafit Items . I Piave aSso` nclosed photos of 'the . area for your use. ,Please contact me s comments are ,received. Thank / Co R c -H Strouse RHS 1J r encs cc John Guest w' 1 print Glenn Just .w.�i" =print Y ' 110 BROADWAY NORWICH CONNECTICUT 06360=4452. . PHONE 203.889.3397 FAX 203 886 7801 07/13/94 15:47 CHANDLER PALMER 8 KING -► 15162871076 901 w, P.r02 .JUL-11-1994 15;43 M 'SEWS & HAM I MOvr"lfork State Department of Environmental Conservatlon Building 40--SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 1170N2356 Telephone (516) . 444-0365 Facsimile (516) .A44-0373 Thomas C. JotiinQ commissloner May 23. 1994 i David S. Gillespie, , Direotbr NY80PRKP Field Servico6 Bureau p:0. Box 199 Waterford,- NY 12186-0189 ; Re: Guest ..- 3 lot subdivision southold, Suffolk Co. 1-4738-00213100002-0 92PR2355 i Dear Mr. G11146pie, The Department recently not with representatives of John and Margaret Guest to discuss hoar to protect thehistoric and archeological resoukeas at this site in accordance with your February .16, 1994 letter. As d result of this meeting I have a. number of questions which I hope you can answer-. 1. During a telephone conversation on March 24, 1994 with Robert .Kuhn, he recommsnded a 50 foot buffer area around the historic structures and archeological sites be included in the .requested conservation easement. . What type of restrictions should 'be .placed on this buffer area? What type of activities will be prohibited in this area? Z. The ,Gueats currently utilize the Magaizine and Fire control ` stmtion. How will the required buffer and easement effect the ability of .the property owner to utilize:thence structures? ' 3. L Thera are existing foot paths`Whioh alloy access to the beach and other areas on the parcel. These paths run through the buffer areas. and area very ..close to soma of 'the .historic structures. Hoar will the imposition of buffers and easements affeeet the maintenance of those foot .paths? J , i ; 07/13/94 15:48 CHANDLER PALMER 8 KING 1516287107E 903 -j JUL-11-1994 15-43 P. IEIJS & HAM P•03 f 1 4. is it necessary for the manhcis/drain on lot 03 to ba included iii the bufferleasaement requirement? Thank you. for your help with thin Matter. Tf you have questions contact me at (516) 444-0357. Sincerely, I Uat.� I - Susan Ackerman Environmental Analyst Z j SVA:cq Kuhn - IOPM G. Just S. Ham I i f . f I i I I 4. .. ua 34 erg 11 I-(5 ENV.CON.... . :. z -- w York. State Department of Fnvi rOnmenlal Conservatt, F.4CswXE7 Rq MEMORA co SHEETAL •' OUR �� IS A lY D (J M p RICOH RAPICCM 220. J:F THME ARE AW Pip . TO. bLtASE G'II,I, (5I6) �5 �rv-MG TRAM T 4.44-^U354 CN, A IMO p FROM • .C' FAX NO a� ��`m OF - SU. C7: - (526) 444-0373 PNONENO.. L IL4MESSAGE- _ 3 i 07/13/94 15:47 CHANDLER PALMER 8 KING i 15162871076 D02 JU_-11-1994 15:44 -EWS 8 HAM f'•84 b New York Stall of k*of Parks,ftweation and Hisfork Preservation Historic Preservation F 10 Urvices Bnreae n We V0ft ATAT( Peebles Island, P4 Box 189.Waterford,New*rk 12106-0189 5t8.237-8843 Orin Ltmw COAYfIQl{Of1M . June 11, 1994 Ms. -Suvan Ackerman � BnviroameAL41 Analyst i .:NYS Departepent of s aviso, ntal { i caoservaitioss Divisioft of Regulatory hffairs FUMY Stony Brook, Building 40 i Stony Brook, Now York 1'1790-23SS � Dear No, Ackerman: l i Res DEC Gast 3 Lot Subdivision Southold, suffolk County I 92PA2345 Thank you far your letter of May 23. 1994 requesting elarifioatien of i our rwcamitwndations tor,the Protection of archeological resourose which may be impacted by the prepared Guest Subdivision. In accordance with the lieu York State Parks, #*creation and Bistoric Yreservation Law, 1160tion 14.09, we offer the following ooaaments, tollowing the order of your letter. 1. No construction or ground diaturbiag activity should be permitted within the SO foot bufiar area. i 2. The Nagasins and Firs Control station may continue is use by the guests; any physieai alterations to these structures, beyond minor a+aiattaaac�r and replaoe:11e0t: 1r-kind of taatorials, should be, reviewed by this office. 3. loot paths may continue in use weed be a6irtsisted by mowing and ' clearing as needed. 4. That manhole/drain an lot E3 does not need to be included in the � bufferfeasfvaent icement. Y! ycu`haw :any 'que etwat, please .call .R4bert Auhn of our project 1leview 'Vait 'st (51e) 237•8643 ext, 281. Sin rarely, ' I/v r c � ' 2 - awes Ooarrea rograa< Analyst IrLeld Services Bureau , .7Fit:qo An Eq al 13ppart miWIAlR move Action Avenq, ��•ruam•«rowwo.• ' .9 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Richard G.Ward,Chairman George Ritchie Latham,Jr. ' '' ` g .� . y. Town Hall,53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. JJ" P. O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold,New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 16, 1993 Stephen L. Ham, III Matthews and Ham. 45 Hampton Rd. Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Minor Subdivision for John & Margaret Guest SCTM* 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on November 15, 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from November 30, 1993 to May 30, 1994. The Planning Board has granted this extension due to the delays caused by the requirement of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for a Stage II Cultural Resource Survey. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding -" the above. S'ncere��y, Richard G. Ward Chairman swbfi� P6 , MS MATTHEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHILLP B.MATTHEWS TELEGOPIER 516-287-1076 (1912-19921 STEPHEN L.HAM,III November 8, 1993 BY TELECOPIER TO 765-1823 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5 ) Dear Board Members: Sketch plan approval for the referenced minor subdivision expires at the end of this month. As you are aware, we have been unable to submit final maps because the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is awaiting the approval of the State Department of Environmental Conservation and the DEC has required a Stage II Cultural Resources Survey. The Stage II Survey has now been performed and we anticipate receiving the written report later this month, at which time we should be in a position to obtain the requisite approvals from the SCDHS and DEC. Based upon the foregoing, I respectfully request that you once again- extend your sketch plan approval for an additional six months to permit us time to obtain these other approvals. Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III 91993 s � _ems; i PB New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Bey jilq 4V4-4")f §tony Brook, New York 11790-2356 FAX (516) 444-0373 MS Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner September 2, 1993 Glenn E. Just J.M.O. Consulting 1 SEP 13 1993 ' P. O. Box 447 Quogue, N.Y. 11959 SOUTilOLD TOVVII RLr�iVNMG BOARD RE: 1-4738-00213/00002-0 John and Margaret Guest Dear Mr. Just: This is in response to your letter and enclosures of July 22, 1993, regarding the timing of the Stage 2 Cultural Resources Survey required as part of the Guest application for a Tidal Wetlands permit to subdivide a 13.7 acre parcel into three lots. The site is on North Hill, Fishers Island adjacent to Fishers Island Sound and contains several areas of regulated freshwater wetlands associated with system #NL-2. Your letter request's that the. Depzrtment of Environmental . Conservation' agree to an arrangement where the Stage 2 survey would not be performed until the subdivision is completed,' lots 1 and 3 are sold off,. and the purchasers of these lots are ready to file development proposals. Deed covenants would require that Stage 2 surveys be done before ground disturbance occurs on' lots 1 and 3. This- arrangement is not acceptable because there is a. good chance it will not provide adequate natural and cultural resource protection on the Guest property. The Department has several programmatic responsibilities in this case. Besides our Tidal Wetlands (Article -25) permit, we have the presence of regulated freshwater wetlands and. the I requirements of the State Historic Preservation Act (SHPA) to consider Even though the' land divis s• ,n ion is regulated under the Freshwater Wetlands Act (Article 24) ; ,prudence dictates that we not authorize creation of: lots .under' Article 25 on which construction cannot be approved under Article-.24. If we were to agree to your post-subdivision Stage 2 survey proposal, and the completed Stage 2 surveys were to identify significant artifacts or structures in or near the" building• envelopes on lo;s 1 and 3, the proposed structures would have to be relocated. Lots 1 and 3 contain freshwater wetlands and are adjacent to .tidal wetlands which could restrict lot purchasers' options in relocating `.'Printed on recYcled paper '/ Glenn E. Just September 2 , 1993 Page 2 ructures. In the extreme the lots may not be proposed st "buildable" at all! lan. If cultural See proposed lot 3 onta�eauofethesproposed ho northeast by use shown, , and resources were found in the Town road setback relocation lstlanisra and donn the'the west east by freshwater we requirements. is done now, before If the Stage 2 Cultural Resources survey is sizes, or plan, there is the layouts, anyone involved is "locked in" to the ° additional building envelopes shown on the current site p to redesign the subdivid. Wercandbencertain in opportunity need to be protected. intended areas which may for n be advanc e that each created lot caural ore cultural sresources. ow purpose without sacrifice of na resources or encroachment on ill be no undue pressure in the future to either al There w ortant cultural r approved the destruction of imp we al freshwater or tidal wetaendsthecnewelot ownersyuse of their subdivision and cannot Y property. The Guests roach is fair to all involved parties. Our approach the purchasers are subdividing and selling, and will know what they are buying (buildable lots) , of the lots will .know what they able use of their wll have protected the resources it's responsible the Department , for while allowing the landowners reason property. office of Parks, Please be advised that although the coon SHPA, DEC is n and Historic Preservatioectsninvolving a technical Recreatio for Department prof and is responsible reviewing agency permitting authority agency with the p e 1 A & B and Stage 2 survey the state and permit for making determinations on Stag With this in required project modifications, requirements, protect cultural resources. conditions necesa that the Stage 2 Cultural Resources Survey mind, I must requireattention in duplicate as soon be completed and submitted to mY to complete the as possible. This is the last it necessary application. Glenn E. Just September 2, 1993 Page 3 If you have any questions, please call me at (516) 444-0365. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Very truly yours, George W. Hammarth Deputy Regional Permit Administrator GWH/rw cc: J. & M. Guest S. L. Ham, III Esq. (iB-:-- Orlowski;.--.fr B. Fullem/C.O. James Warren L. Kuwik file t MATTHEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHIMP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 (1912.1002) STEPHE\L.HAM,III July 6, 1993 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest at Fishers Island (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5) Dear Board Members: I have enclosed a copy of a letter from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to John A. Wieland of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in which that Office recommends that, rather than requiring a Stage II Cultural Resource Survey to be performed prior to subdivision of the Guest property, covenants be filed as a condition to NYSDEC approval requiring such a Survey only prior to construction activities. I have prepared language for the Guests ' Declaration which I believe will satisfy NYSDEC. The language appears at paragraph 6 of the enclosed revised Declaration and takes the place of the former covenant requiring an archaeologist to be present during excavation. Except for that substitution and the insertion of references to NYSDEC in the recital clauses, the revised Declaration is in form and substance the same as the one you have already approved. Since the new covenant is actually more restrictive than the one you required, I assume you will have no problem in approving the revised Declaration. However, I would appreciate it if you would review it (with the Town Attorney if necessary) and let me know whether it is acceptable. Thank you for your attention to this matter. �R Very trulyyours, A Stephen L. Ham, III Enclosures P I JUL 1 3 1993 � L Q a1Sup�O4 AI,11- BOARD ��GPEATION•H�Sr9 O a m o rn New York State Office of-Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation U Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau U. O NEW YORK STATE ° Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 Orin Lehman Commissioner June 24, 1993 Mr. John A. Wieland Senior Environmental Analyst NYS Department of Environmental Conservation DRA-1, Building 40 SUNY at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York 11790 Dear Mr. Wieland: Re: DEC 1-4738-00213/2-0 Guest 3 Lot Subdivision Southold(T) , Suffolk County 92PR2345 The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) has received a letter from Stephen L. Ham, III Esq. on behalf of John and Margaret Guest requesting relief from the requirement to perform a Stage II Cultural Resource Survey prior to subdivision of the subject property. Mr. Ham has suggested that covenants requiring a stage II survey prior to future construction placed on each of the resulting vacant parcels would provide adequate protection for cultural resources on these lands. The OPRHP agrees that such covenants would provide sufficient protection and recommends that the attachment of such covenants to the newly created parcels be incorporated as a condition of issuance of a DEC permit. If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact James Warren at 518/237-8643, ext. 280. Sincerely, 'Bruce B. Fullem Assistant Director Field Services Bureau BBF/JPW:tr W09609/062493 cc: Stephen L. Hamm III, Esq. An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency "printed on recycled paper DECLARATION DECLARATION, made the day of July, 1993 , by JOHN S. GUEST and MARGARET H. GUEST, both now residing at 839 Weed Street, New Canaan, Connecticut, hereinafter referred to collectively as the Declarants. WHEREAS, the Declarants are the owners of certain real property situate at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, as shown on the .map entitled "Minor Subdivision Plan - Property of John S . Guest and Margaret H. Guest" , prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King, dated December 4, 1989, revised 10 May 1990, 20 November 1990, 30 November 1990 and 21 September 1992, DISTRICT which map is to be filed in the Office of the Suffolk County 1000 SECTION Clerk, said real property being more particularly described on 006 . 00 Schedule A hereto; and BLOCK WHEREAS, the Declarants have made application to the 01 . 00 LOT Planning Board of the Town of Southold and the New York State 005 . 000 Department of Environmental Conservation for approval of a minor subdivision as shown on the above referred to map to create three separate parcels shown as Lots 1, 2 and 3 thereon, said Lots being more particularly described on Schedules B, C and D hereto, respectively; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of said granting of approval, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation have deemed it to be in the best interests of the Town of Southold and State of New York and the owners and prospective owners of said Lots that C C � 0 V N 1 JUL .1319M SOUT,OLD TOVvN PLANNING BOA0 the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said Lots, and as a condition of said approval, said Planning Board and Department of Environmental Conservation have required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk; and WHEREAS, the Declarants have considered the foregoing and determined that the same will be for the best interests of the Declarants and subsequent owners of said Lots; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarants, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed, do hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said Lots described on Schedule B, Schedule C and Schedule D hereto shall hereinafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That no lot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board and that there shall be no further subdivision of any lot in perpetuity. 2 . That clearing and grading within each Lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Declarants and subsequent owners of the Lots shall be permitted to continue to trim 2 vegetation on the Lots so as to preserve the views from their dwellings and otherwise to maintain the Lots in a neat and orderly manner so long as they do so in compliance with all State and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations then in effect. 3 . That no new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. 4 . That no stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its Lots shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 5. That all prospective owners of Lots within this subdivision are hereby advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. 6. That prior to the issuance of a building permit or the commencement of any construction on either Lot 1 or Lot 3 , as described on Scheudles B and D, respectively, the then owner of such Lot shall cause (a) a Stage II Cultural Resources Survey to be conducted on such Lot to establish the vertical and horizontal boundaries of the archaeological site, the presence or absence of intact features or artifact deposits beneath the plow zone, and the number and cultural affiliation of the components at the site, and (b) a report reflecting the findings of such Survey to be delivered to the Town of Southold Planning Board and the regional office of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants above named have 3 executed the foregoing Declaration as of the day and year first above written. John S. Guest Margaret H. Guest STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss. . COUNTY OF ) On the day of July, 1993 , before me personally appeared John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest, to me known and known to me to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Public 4 Y SCHEDULE A -- DESCRIPTIQN OF THE ENTIRE GUEST SUBDIVISION A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon , located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County. of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue , said point being located 6594 . 56 feet North of a . point which is 3449 . 90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees , 36 minutes and 00 seconds West 58 . 14 feet along sai"d avenue line to a monument ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 648 . 46 feet along the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue to a monument ; thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 492 . 94 feet to a point ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West about 339 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence following the meanders of said high water line in a general Northwesterly and Northeasterly direction about 1980 feet to a point ; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the point of beginning . The above described tract is subject to a right of way 25 . 00 feet in width , in favor ' of land now or formerly of Thomas W . Russell , Jr . which adjoins the above described tract on the South , said right of way being described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229 . 70 feet to, a point ; thence South 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 01 second West 103 . 88 feet to a point ; thence South 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds West 132 . 00 feet to a point ; .thence South 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds East 86 . 09 feet to a monument ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 25 . 76 feet to a point ; thence North 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds West 87 . 96 feet to a point ; thence North 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds East 148 . 06 feet to a point ; thence North 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 00 seconds East 98 . 41 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 222 . 90 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . Together with a right' of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : r Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds Test 81 . 47 fee,t along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . SCHF."LE B - DESCRIPTION OF LOT. A certain t-ract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said -monument 'being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and. running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 492 . 94 feet to a point ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 329 . 34 feet to a monument ; thence continuing South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West about 10 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northwesterly about 480 feet along said high water line to a point ; thence South 84 degrees , 59 minutes and 33 seconds East 350 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 142 . 56 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the point of beginning . Containing 3 . 7 acres , more or less . Together with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minu.tes_ and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the sai.d Southwesterly line of Crescent Av-enue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . The above described tract is subject to a right of way 25 . 00 feet in width , in favor of land now or formerly of Thomas W . Russell , Jr . which adjoins the above described tract on the South , said right of way being described as follows : Beginning at the point of beginning of the above described tract and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 . minutes and 54 seconds East 229 . 70. feet to a point ; thence South 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 01 second West 103 . 88 feet to a point ; thence South 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds West 132 . 00 feet to a point ; thence South 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds East 86 . 09 feet to a monument ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 25 . 76 feet to a point ; thence North 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds West 87 . 96 feet to a point ; thence North 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds East 148 . 06 feet to a point ; thence North 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 00 seconds East 98 . 41 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 222 . 90 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the point of beginning . Subject also to a right of way , for all purposes , in favor of the owners of Lot #2 over the existing driveway which crosses the above described tract running in a Southwesterly direction from the Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue . SU-H'EDULE C — DESCRIPTION OF LOT 2 A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon , located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue , said point being- located 6240 . 25 feet North of a point which is 3596 . 71 feet West of a monument marking th.e United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 263 . 46 feet along said avenue line to a point ; thence North 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds West 25 . 04 feet to a point ; thence South 14 degrees . 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds East 142 . 56 feet to a point ; thence North 84 degrees , 59 minutes and 33 seconds West 350 . 00 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northwesterly and Northeasterly about 810 feet along said high water line to a point ; thence South 18 degrees , 35 minutes and 17 seconds East about 240 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 41 minutes and 56 seconds East 360 . 00 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue and the point of beginning . Containing 5 . 7 acres , more or less . Together with a right of way for all purposes over the existing driveway which crosses Lot #1 . Together also with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 . degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet. to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue . line to the monument at the point of beginning . SCH LE D DESCRIPTION OF LO' A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 6594 . 56 feet North of a poi.nt which is 3449 . 90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees , 36 minutes and 00 seconds West 58 . 14 feet along said avenue line to a monument ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 360 . 00 feet along the Westerly line of said Crescent Avenue to a point ; thence North 75 degrees , 41 minutes and 56 seconds West 360 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 18 degrees , 35 minutes and 17 seconds West about 240 feet to the high . water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northeasterly about 690 feet following the meanders of said high water line to a point ; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the point of beginning . Containing 4 . 3 acres , more or less . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSi. 1, i SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman e!e�`''�' ,�� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 1 1971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 25, 1993 Stephen L. Ham, III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest-& Margaret H. Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham; The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on May 24, 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from May 30, 1993 to November 30,. 1993 . The Planning Board has granted this extension due to the delays caused by the requirement of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for a Stage II Cultural Resource Survey. Please contact this office if .you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman MATTHEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287.1076 (1912.19921 STEPHEN L.HAM,III May 11, 1993 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5) Dear Board Members: The most recent extension of sketch plan approval for the referenced minor subdivision expires at the end of this month. As you are aware, numerous obstacles beyond our control have prevented us from bringing this matter to a close. I will discuss the most recent ones in this letter. As at least Ken Edwards is aware, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has required the performance of a Stage II Cultural Resource Survey notwithstanding your determination that future studies could await actual excavation at the site. This decision was apparently made by the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. Glenn Just of J.M.O. Consulting, who is handling for the Guests the applications to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and NYSDEC has made, alone and with me, numerous calls to the OPRHP in an attempt to resolve this issue. Our calls have not been returned. In addition, Mr. Just has tried without success to negotiate a compromise with Susan Ackerman of NYSDEC. I have also written to the NYSDEC requesting relief from its requirement. Our inability to obtain NYSDEC approval has prevented approval of the subdivision by the SCDHS. Without that approval, of course, we cannot request that you put this matter on your calendar for a final hearing. Continued MAYI IN 13 i99 E Ptrg�llE!!V BfJfrw Planning Board May 11, 1993 Re: Guest Page 2 Based upon the foregoing, I respectfully request that you once again extend your sketch plan approval for an additional six months to permit us time to satisfy NYSDEC and to obtain SCDHS approval or to pursue other appropriate legal action. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Very truly yours, 1� Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja cc: John S. Guest Glenn Just MATT=WS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.,119(i8 516-280-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 uei2•iee2) STEPHE-T L.HAM,III January 6, 1993 Mr. John Wieland " NYSDEC I N JAN SUNY - Building 40 Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 �v SCUT!-OLD TCV�I�d __PLAWING BOARD Re: Application No. 1-4738-00213/00002-0 Dear Mr. Wieland: I represent John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest in connection with. their application to the Town of Southold Planning Board for approval of a minor subdivision of property situate at Fishers Island (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5) . Glenn Just of J.M.O. Consulting has been handling the Guests ' application to NYSDEC under the referenced application number. Mr. Guest has forwarded to me a notice he received recently from your office (copy enclosed) indicating that a Stage II Assessment will be required. Please be advised that the lead agency, the Town of Southold Planning Board, has granted a Negative Declaration for this project. I have enclosed a copy of that Declaration, together with a copy of the Board' s transmittal letter to me. As you can see from the Negative Declaration, the lead. agency is not requiring a Stage II Assessment. Final approval will, however, be conditioned upon the filing of a Declaration that will require the presence of an archaeologist at the time of any excavation at the site. I have submitted a draft Declaration for review by the Planning Board (copy enclosed) and am awaiting the comments of its representatives. Upon approval, I will have it signed and acknowledged by Mr. and Mrs. Guest and recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk. The Liber and page of the recorded - Declaration will be reflected on the final subdivision map that will be filed in such Office. Approval of the subdivision by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is expected this month. Continued Mr. John Wieland January 6, 1993 Page 2 Under these circumstances, I respectfully request that NYSDEC modify its notice to the extent necessary to permit approval of the subdivision subject to the filing of a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions containing language satisfying the condition set forth in the Negative Declaration. My clients have already undergone substantial delay and expense in attempting to satisfy the many requirements of the relevant governmental authorities. (The cost of the Stage I Assessment alone exceeded $6, 000 and many months of delay resulted from its being required. ) I would therefore appreciate any assistance you could render in expediting NYSDEC approval subject only to satisfaction of the condition set forth in the Negative Declaration. If you have any questions or comments, please give me a call. Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja cc (w/ enclosures) : Mr. John S. Guest Mr. Glenn Just Ms. Melissa Spiro - Planning Board DECLARATION DECLARATION, made the day of January, 1993 , by JOHN S. GUEST and MARGARET H. GUEST, both now residing. at 839 Weed treet,. New 'Canaan, Connecticut, hereinafter referred to collectively as the Declarants. WHEREAS, the Declarants are the owners of certain real roperty situate at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, as shown on the map entitled "Minor Subdivision Plan - Property of. John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest" , prepared y Chandler, Palmer & King, dated December 4, 1989, revised 10 May 1990, 20 November 1990, 30 November 1990 and 21 September. 1992, DISTRICT which map is to be filed in the Office of the Suffolk County 1000 Clerk, said real property being more particularly described on SECTION 6 Schedule A hereto; and BLOCK WHEREAS, the Declarants have made application to the 1 Planning Board of the Town of Southold for approval of a minor LOT 5 subdivision as shown on the above referred to map to create three separate parcels shown as Lots 1, 2 and 3 thereon, said Lots being ore particularly described on Schedules B, C and D hereto; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of said granting of approval, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has deemed it o be in the best interests of the Town of Southold and the owners and prospective owners of said Lots that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said Lots, and as a condition of said pproval, said Planning Board has required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk; and 1 WHEREAS, the Declarants have considered the foregoing and determined that the same will be for the best interests of the Declarants and subsequent owners of said Lots; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarants, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed, do hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said Lots described on Schedule B, Schedule C and Schedule D hereto shall hereinafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That no lot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board and that there shall be no further subdivision of any lot in perpetuity. 2 . That clearing and grading within each Lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent -of preserving as much of the natural- vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Declarants and subsequent owners of the Lots shall be permitted to continue to trim vegetation on the Lots so as to preserve the views from their dwellings and otherwise to. maintain the Lots in a neat and orderly manner so long as they do so in compliance with all State and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations then in effect. 3 . That no new residential structure or sanitary 2 disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. 4 . That no stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its Lots shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 5. That all prospective owners of Lots within this subdivision are hereby advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. 6. That prior to excavation for a foundation on any of the Lots, the exact building site must be inspected by a professional archaeologist. In addition, during any excavation, a professional archaeologist shall be present. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants above named have executed the foregoing Declaration as of the day and year first above written. John S. Guest Margaret H. Guest STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss. . COUNTY . OF ) On the day of January, 1993, before me personally appeared John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest, to me known and known to me to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Public 3 SCHEDULE A i D E_S_C R I P T I_0_N......_0 F...__T.H E..._:ENT_I_R .......... _U E S,T......S U_B D..I.V I_S I.O.N A certain tract or parcel of land . with the building thereon , located at Fishers Island , Town 'of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue , said point being located 6594 . 56 feet North of a point which is 3449 . 90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees , 36 minutes and 00 seconds West 58 . 14 feet along said avenue line to a monument ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 648 . 46 feet along the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue to a monument ; thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 492 . 94 feet to a point ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West about 339 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence following the meanders of said high water line in a general Northwesterly and Northeasterly direction about 1980 feet to a point ; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the point of beginning . The above described tract is subject to a right of way 25 . 00 feet in width , in favor of land now or formerly of Thomas W . Russell , Jr . which adjoins the above described tract on the South , said right of way being described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229 . 70 feet to a point ; thence South 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 01 second West 103 . 88 feet to a point ; thence South 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds West 132 . 00 feet to a point ; thence South 29 degrees., 52 . minutes and 00 seconds East 86 . 09. feet to a monument ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 25 . 76 feet to a point ; thence North 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds West 87 . 96 feet to a point ; thence North 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds East 148 . 06 feet to a point ; thence North 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 00 seconds East 98 . 41 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 222 . 90 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . Together with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue- with the Southwesterly line of said. Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and .. 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . i SCHF"",E B - DESCRIPTION OF LOT A certain- tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 492 . 94 feet to a point ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 329 . 34 feet to a monument ; thence continuing South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West about 10 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northwesterly about 480 feet along said high water line to a point ; thence South 84 degrees , 59 minutes and 33 seconds East 350 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 142 . 56 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the point of beginning . Containing 3 . 7 acres , more or less . Together with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81. 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . The above described tract is subject to a right of way 25 . 00 feet in width , in favor of land now or formerly of Thomas W . Russell , Jr . which adjoins the above described tract on the South , said right of way being described as follows : Beginning at the point of beginning of the above described tract and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229 . 70 feet to a point ; thence South -41 degrees , 03 minutes and 01 second West 103 . 88 feet to a point ; thence South 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds West 132 . 00 feet to a point ; thence South 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds East 86 . 09 feet to a monument ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 25 . 76 feet to a point ; thence North 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds West 87 . 96 feet to a point ; thence North 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds East 14.8 . 06 feet to a point ; thence North 41 degrees , 0.3 minutes and 00 seconds East . 98 . 41 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees, 39 minutes and '55 seconds West 222 . 90 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to . the point of beginning . Subject also to a right of way , for all purposes , in favor of the owners of Lot #2 over the existing driveway which crosses the above described tract running in a Southwesterly direction from the Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue . Si___—DULE C - DESCRIPTION OF 2 A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon , located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded 'and described as follows : Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue , said point being located 6240 . 25 feet North of a point which is 3596 . 71 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 263 . 46 feet along said avenue line to a point ; thence North 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds West 25 . 04 feet to a point ; thence South 14 degrees . 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds East 142 . 56 feet to a point ; thence North 84 degrees , 59 minutes and 33 seconds West 350 . 00 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northwesterly and Northeasterly about 810 feet along said high water line to a point ; thence South 18 degrees , 35 minutes and 17 seconds East about 240 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 41 minutes and 56 seconds East 360 . 00 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue and the point of beginning . Containing 5 . 7 acres , more or less . Together with a right of way for all purposes over the existing driveway which crosses Lot #1 . Together also with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station . "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . SCH: LE D _ DESCRIPTION OF LO' A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 6594 . 56 feet North of a point which is 3449 . 90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees , 36 minutes and 00 seconds West 58 . 14 feet along said avenue line to a monument ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 360 . 00 feet along the Westerly line of said Crescent Avenue to a point ; thence North 75 degrees , 41 minutes and 56 seconds West 360 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 18 degrees , 35 minutes and 17 seconds West about 240 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northeasterly about 690 feet following the meanders of said high water line to a point ; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the . point of beginning . Containing 4 . 3. acres , more or less . o� Gy1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.', Chairman � ® Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Q a Richard G. Ward 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF�OtUTLJOr D2 0, 19 9 2 Fax (516) 765-1823 Stephen L. Ham, III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, NY 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM41000-6-1-5 Dear .Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October. 19, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records Very truly your s,/� Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ''hts Chairman Encl. g1lFFO(�co o� Gy�c PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman °y ® Supervisor George Ritchie Latham,.Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1 179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE .DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance October 19, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not .be prepared. Name of Action: . John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM#(: 1000-6-1-5 Location: West side of Crescent Avenue; Fishers Island SEQR Status: Type I (X ) Unlisted ( ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X ) Description of Action: Residential subdivision of 13 .7 acre parcel into 3 lots; 3 .7 acres, 4.3 acres and 4.3 acres respectively. Page 2 John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SEQR Negative Declaration Con' t. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The project has been designed in a manner to mitigate impact to the wetlands. The building envelopes have been located more than 100 ' feet from the wetland and the area outside of the building envelope is in a natural and undisturbed state. A Cultural Resource Assessment, Stage I has been conducted and any final approval of the subdivision will contain the following condition: Prior to foundation excavation, the exact building site shall be inspected by a professional archeologist. In addition, a professional archeologist shall be present during any excavation. The proposed house on Lot#1 has been located in a manner to avoid impact to the 14" oak tree. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Because there has been no. correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone ,Number: ( 516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Roger Evans, DEC .Commissioner Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant N Y S DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SUNY CAMPUS, BLDG 40, ROOM 219 STONY BROOK , NEW YORK 11790-2356 516-751-7900 SAVE THE TOP HALF OF THIS FORM FOR YOUR RECORDS AND RETURN THE BOTTOM HALF WHEN PROVIDING THE INFORMATION REQUESTED ON THE ACCOMPANYING NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION. YOUR DOING SO WILL HELP US EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT PROCESSING. THANK YOU. DEC CONTACT SUSAN V ACKERMAN BATCH ID 079796 APPLICATION ID 1-4738-00213/00002-0 OWNER ID 32373 DATE RECEIVED 10/15/90 APPLICATION TYPE NEW APPLICANT NAME JOHN S & MARGARET GUEST FACILITY NAME GUEST PROPERTY PROJECT DESC SUBDIVIDE PARCEL; CONSTRUCT S.F.D.,S.S. PLEASE PROVIDE REQUESTED INFORMATION ON OR BEFORE -- SAVE THIS PART ! DETACH N Y S DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION REGION 1 - STONY BROOK RETURN THIS HALF OF THIS FORM WHEN PROVIDING THE INFORMATION REQUESTED ON THE ACCOMPANYING NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION. DEC CONTACT SUSAN V ACKERMAN BATCH ID 079796 APPLICATION ID 1-4738-00213/00002-0 OWNER ID 32373 DATE RECEIVED 10/15/90 APPLICATION TYPE NEW APPLICANT NAME JOHN S & MARGARET GUEST FACILITY NAME GUEST PROPERTY PROJECT DESC SUBDIVIDE PARCEL; CONSTRUCT S.F.D.,S.S. INFORMATION DUE ON OR BEFORE -- PLEASE ATTACH THIS HALF SO IT IS DISPLAYED PROMINENTLY ON YOUR RESUBMISSION RETURN THIS PART ! NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION - THIS IS NOT A PERMIT APPLICANT: OWNER ID NUMBER: 32373 JOHN S & MARGARET GUEST 839 WEED ST. NEW CANAAN, CT 06840 APPLICATION ID. 1-4738-00213/00002-0 BATCH NUMBER. 079796 PERMITS APPLIED FOR. 1 ARTICLE 25: TIDAL WETLANDS 1 ARTICLE 24: FRESHWATER WETLANDS FACILrrYiPROJECT: GUEST PROPERTY PROJECT IS LOCATED IN SOUTHOLD IN SUFFOLK COUNTY. Your Application for Permit is Incomplete, the Following Items are Required: ■ Stage 11 archaeological survey and report. (Report for Archaeological Field Reconnaissance: Archaeological Site File/Literature Search Report and Report of Field Reconnaissance enclosed - pages 8 - 11 and site inventory forms apply). Additional Information: MR. JUST: A STAGE II CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. PLEASE TELEPHONE ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS NO FURTHER ACTION CAN BE TAKEN UNTIL ALL OF THESE MA41�LSYAIIE RECEIVED CONTACT PERSON: SUSAN V ACKERMAN SIGNATURE. NYS DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS DATE: 12/23/92 REGION 1 STONY BROOK SUNY CAMPUS,BLDG 40,ROOM 219 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 51 6-751-7900 STONY BROOK NEW YORK 1 17 90-23 66 •� ���� .per az SS 5. � PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS " ' ' Ar. •�,''�% � SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman � ' � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �j Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 24, 1992 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews- & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM#1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 23 , 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from November 30, 1992 to May 30, 1993 . The Planning Board has granted this additional extension due to the time expended for review of the Stage I Cultural Assessment. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, �J Bennett Orlowski, r. Chairman MATTHI WS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y,11968 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 (1912.1092) STEPHE-i L.HAM,III November 12, 1992 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5) Dear Board Members: Sketch plan approval for the referenced minor subdivision application expires on November 30, 1992. You recently issued a negative declaration relating to this matter and we are in the process of applying to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for approval. As you are aware, our application has been subject to delays occasioned by the requirement of a Stage I Assessment and we are proceeding as expeditiously as practicable with this matter. I respectfully request that you grant a further extension of your sketch plan approval for this project to May 31, 1993. Your anticipated cooperation is much appreciated. Very truly yours, !� A� Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja 1U NOV 1 6 1992 SOUT1-10LL PLANNI,i1G BQ,q?,D NOV 1 6 1992 DECLARATION ,�-a S6UTMt D T0R1R DECLARATION, made the day of November�q AA2q;by JOHN S. GUEST and MARGARET H. "GUEST, both now residing at 839 Weed Street, New Canaan, Connecticut, hereinafter referred to collectively as the Declarants. WHEREAS, the Declarants are the owners of certain real property situate at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, as shown on the map entitled "Minor Subdivision Plan - Property of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest", prepared y Chandler, Palmer & King, dated December 4, 1989, revised 10 May DISTRICT 1990, 20 November 1990, 30 November 1990 and 21 September 1992, 1000 SECTION which map is to be filed in the Office of the Suffolk County 6Clerk, said real property being more particularly described on BLOCK Schedule A hereto; and 1 LOT WHEREAS, the Declarants have made application to the 5Planning Board of the Town of Southold for approval of a minor subdivision as shown on the above referred to map to create three eparate parcels shown as Lots 1, 2 and 3 thereon, said Lots being ore particularly described on Schedules B, C and D hereto; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of said granting of approval, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has deemed it o be in the best interests of the Town of Southold and the owners and prospective owners of said Lots that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said Lots, and as a condition of said pproval, said Planning Board has required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk; 1 and WHEREAS, the Declarants have considered the foregoing and determined that the same will be for the best interests of the Declarants and subsequent. owners of said Lots; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarants, for the purpose, ofcarrying out the intentions above expressed, do hereby make known,. admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said Lots described on Schedule B, Schedule C and Schedule D hereto shall hereinafter be- subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be inding upon all purchasers of said premises, their heirs; executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That no Lot shall be subdivided. or its lot lines changed in any -manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning. Board. 2. That clearing and grading within each Lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a. house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. otwithstanding the foregoing, the Declarants and subsequent owners of the Lots shall be permitted to continue to trim and clear vegetation on the Lots so as to preserve the views from heir dwellings and otherwise to maintain the Lots in a neat and orderly manner so long as they do so in compliance with all State nd local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations then in effect. 2 3 . That no new residential structure • or sanitary disposal fac-ility, shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff.. 4. That no stormwater runoff resulting from . the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its Lots shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 5. That all prospective owners ' of Lots within this subdivision are hereby advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth 'Airport and therefore 'may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. 6. That prior to excavation for a foundation on any of the Lots, the exact building site must be inspected by a professional archaeologist. In addition, during any excavation, a professional archaeologist shall be present. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants above named have executed the foregoing Declaration as of the day and year first above written. John S. Guest Margaret H. Guest STATE OF. CONNECTICUT ) ss. . COUNTY OF ) On the day of November, 1992, before me personally appeared John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest, to' me known and known to me to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and' they acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Public 3 c"HEDULE A DESCRIPTION OF THE ENTIRE GUE5T SUBDIVISION A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon , located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue , said point being located 6594 . 56 feet North of a point which is 3449 . 90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees , 36 minutes and 00 seconds West 58 . 14 feet along said avenue line to a monument ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds blest 648 . 46 feet along the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue to a monument ; thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 492 . 94 feet to a point ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West about 339 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence following the meanders of said high water line in a general Northwesterly and Northeasterly direction about 1980 .feet to a point ; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the point of beginning . The above described tract is subject to a right of way 25 . 00 feet in width , in favor of land now or formerly of Thomas W . Russell , Jr . which adjoins the above described tract on the South , said right of way being described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with "the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667.. 96 feet West of the monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229 . 70 feet to a point ; thence South 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 01 second West 103 . 88 feet to a point ; thence South 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds West 132 . 00 feet -to a point ; thence South 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds East 86 . 09 feet to a monument ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 25 . 76 feet to a point ; thence North 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds West 87 . 96 feet to a point ; thence North 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds East 148 . 06 feet to a point ; thence North 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 00 seconds East 98 . 41 feet. to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 222 . 90 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and OO seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 .minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of .beginning . Together with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 .feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 .minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56. seconds West 81 . 47 fee.t along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . SCHEDUIv B - DESCRIPTION OF LOT 1 A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County. of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue .with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3.667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 492 . 94 feet to a point ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 329 . 34 .feet to a monument ; thence continuing South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West about 10 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northwesterly about 480 feet along said high water line to a point ; thence South 84 degrees , 59 minutes and 33 seconds East 350 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 142 . 56 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds . West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the point of beginning . Containing 3 . 7 acres , more or less . Together with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds 'West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . The above described tract is subject to a right of way 25 . 00 feet in width , in favor of land now or formerly of Thomas W . Russell , Jr . which adjoins the above described tract on the South , said right of way being described as follows : Beginning at the point of beginning of the above described tract and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229 . 70 feet to a point ; thence South �41 degrees , 03 minutes and 01 second West 103 . 88 feet to a point ; thence South 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds West 132 . 00 feet to a point; thence South 29 . degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds East 86 . 09 feet to a monument ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 25 . 76 feet to a point ; thence North 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds West 87 . 96 feet to a point ; thence North 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds East 148 . 06 feet to a point ; thence North 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 00 seconds East 98 . 41 feet to a point; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 222 . 90 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minute-s and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the point of beginning . Subject also to a right of way , for all purposes , in favor of the owners of Lot #2 over the existing driveway which crosses the above described tract running in a Southwesterly direction from the Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue . i SCHI LE C - DESCRIPTION OF LOI z A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon , located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue , said point being located 6240 . 25 feet North of a point which . is 3596 . 71 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 263 . 46 feet along said avenue line to a point ; thence North 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds West 25 . 04 feet to a point ; thence South 14 degrees . 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds East 142 . 56 feet to a point ; thence North 84 degrees , 59 minutes and 33 seconds West 350 . 00 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island - Sound ; thence Northwesterly and Northeasterly about 810 feet along said high water line to a point ; thence South 18 degrees , 35 minutes and 17 seconds East about 240 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 41 minutes and 56 seconds East 360 . 00 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue and the point of beginning . Containing 5 . 7 acres , more or less . Together with a right of way for all purposes over the existing driveway which crosses Lot #1 . Together also with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument_ at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station ."PROS" and running thence .South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , .26 minutes and 00' .seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . SCHEDU 'D - DESCRIPTLON OF LOT 3' _ A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 6594 . 56 feet North of a point which is 3449 . 90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees , 36 minutes and 00 seconds West 58 . 14 feet along said avenue line to a monument ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 360 . 00 feet along the Westerly line of said Crescent Avenue to a point ; thence North 75 degrees , 41 minutes and 56 seconds West 360 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 18 degrees , 35 minutes and 17 seconds West about 240 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northeasterly about 690 feet following the meanders of said high water line to a point ; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the point of beginning . Containing 4 . 3 acres , more or less . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS t�" ` SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman !'::: �`� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Wardca Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD HH OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OFOtUOb-er0, 1992 Fax (516) 765-1823 Stephen L. Ham, III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, CT 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM#1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 19, 1992 . BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning 'Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, make a determination of non-significance, and grant .a Negative. Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Encl. ♦n'*�l SCOTT L. HARRIS PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS x Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �.�^ p�z�_. �-"" Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward 4 `£' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance October 19, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will- not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM# : 1000-6-1-5 Location: West side of Crescent Avenue; Fishers Island SEQR Status: Type I (X ) Unlisted ( ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X ) Description of Action: Residential subdivision of 13.7 acre parcel into 3 lots; 3 .7 acres, 4.3 acres and 4.3 acres respectively. Page 2 John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest " SEQR Negative Declaration Con' t. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The project has been designed in a mannerto mitigate impact to the wetlands. The building envelopes have been located more than 100 ' feet from the wetland and the area outside of the building envelope is in a natural and undisturbed state. A Cultural Resource Assessment, Stage I has been conducted and any final approval of the subdivision will contain the following condition: Prior to foundation excavation, the exact building site shall be inspected by a professional archeologist. In .addition, a professional archeologist shall be present during any excavation. The proposed house on Lot#1 has been located in a manner to avoid impact to the 14" oak tree. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections. from that agency. Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: ( 516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Roger Evans, DEC .Commissioner Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant Ms MATTTIEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 41012-1992) - STEPHEN L.HAM,III September 28, 1992 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attn. : Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; (SCTM 1000-6-1-5) Dear Melissa: I have enclosed 8 prints of a revised Minor Subdivision Plan relating to the referenced minor subdivision. Please proceed with your review of the application and give me a call if you require any further information or documentation. Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja Enclosures t] :SEP 3 0 1992 SOU-F1 jLD TO L PLAiVNI;\1fG BOARD F Ftf �GFCE The Henry L. Ferguson Museum 4 ' Fishers Island, New York 06390 ;. June 5, 1992 5 A J . 1W. - IM 4 Fishers Island Planning & .Zoning , `tlj ` rE Board # Attention: Kenneth Edwards Dear Sirs : a I am writing to your Board in connection with two archaeological surveys that have been made re- cently on Fishers Island. One was for John S. and Margaret H. Guest who reside on Crescent Avenue, �f Fishers Island and the other for Annette Zabohon- ski also of Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island, N.Y. -. a The two surveys are dated .April 1g92 and were done by Robert L. Miller, Ph.D. of -Clover Archaeological Services of Northport, N.Y. During the past sixty-five years, a good deal of archaeological work has been conducted on the Island, first by my father, Henry L, Ferguson and more recently for the past eight consecutive years by professional teams from the New York State Museum in -albany, N.Y. (Dr. Robert E. Funk) and John Pfeiffer of Old Lyme, Ct. Both are high- ly respected professionals. They have conducted considerable test transects of the Island as has Robert L. Miller on North Hill. Native American habitation sites are scattered widely up and down the Island but concentrated most densely around the shallow harbors such as r West Harbor, Hay Harbor and East harbor. Inland sites are to be located near fresh water: Barlow r Pond, Turtle Pond, Grass Pond, etc. To date no e' Paleoindian site has been discovered on the Island �w 10,000 to 8,000 B.C. We do have artifacts in the H.L.F.Mus.eum which are ascribed to the Archaic Period, 8,000 to 1 ,500 B.C. y; Fishers Island has proven to be a valuable _. r contributor to furthering the knowledge of coastal � � I The Henry L. Ferguson Museum Fishers Island, New York 06390 Native Americans, their life- styles under chang- ing climatic conditions and rising sea levels. In 1992 . Or early 1993 Dr. Robert E. Funk will produce a final report on the findings that have ; ._ been made on Fishers Island. This will be a very ; authoritive document. As a conseauen.ce of the revived scientific interest in Fishers Island archaeology it is my firm belief, as President of the Henry L. Fergusor Y Museum that ever effort must be taken to pre- serve whatever prehistoric or historic ' finds ' there may be made in the future or of existing ones which may be known. It appears logical to me that before any foundation excavations take that a lace p professional examine the exact spot and be Yµs, present during the excavations. This woul;i eliminate costly 150 page reports and save time. ( ) Finally, I believe that contractors and excavators have an .obl.igation to report any- Z thing unusual they unearth be it prehistoric or a historic. =� As an ardent amateur archaeologist I have ?� written the above with great concern for the pos- 1C sibility of lost scientific data but also with R. concern for land owners who too often must con- Pe tend with expenses, delays some of which may be unnecessary. Sincerely, con (*) I further suggest Charles B. Ferguson that this monitoring President be. part of a building contract. CRAMER, V OA OCIATES ENVIRONMENG CONSULTANTS May 28, 1992 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision John Guest State IA& IB Archaeological Investigation SCTM #1000-6-15 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Regarding your inquiry dated May 14, 1992,we have performed the preliminary review for the Stage IA and IB Archaeological Investigation dated April 1992 for the above noted subdivision. We estimate the cost to undertake the review to be $650.00. If the Planning,B'oard wishes us to proceed, please submit a copy of the purchase order authorizing s e,,---..- Very truly yo Tho W. Cramer, ASI A y FMAY Ids ,K,I "r ITHOW TOWN BOARD 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 I czCOD , PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ? SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ®� �`` Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 19, 1992 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton. Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM#1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 18, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant . a six month extension of sketch approval from May 30, 1992 to November 30, 1992. The Planning Board has received the Stage I Cultural Assessment and has granted the additional extension to allow time for review of same. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding. the above. Very truly yours, 45vm�Ali', Bennett Orlowski, r. Chairman ��Og�FFO(,�co o� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS CW403a SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ��` ® �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward `Y ` Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 14, .1992 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 - RE: Minor Subdivision John Guest State IA & IB Archaeological Investigation SCTM*1000-6-1 5 Dear Messrs. Cramer and Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Stage IA & IB Archaeological Investigation dated April, 1992 for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Please develop an estimate .of what it will cost to undertake the review. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very truly yours Bennett Orlowski,l r. Chairman Encl. P� MATTHEWS & IIAM � ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 STEPHEN L.HAM,III May 6, 1992 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; SCTM # 1000-6-1-5 Dear Board Members: I am delivering herewith four copies of the Stage I_ Cultural Assessment as required by your letter of February 5, 1991. Due to the delays resulting from this requirement, a further extension of sketch plan approval, which currently expires on May 30, 1992, will be necessary. Please grant a further extension at your next meeting on May 18, 1992 . Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja Enclosureso BY HAND L9 `v D MAY - 6 1992 SOUTHO�D . PLANPtirvG��c,�D PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �ia,wi Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward ? ,vf Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 10, 1991 . Stephen L. Ham Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road * Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision John .S. Guest and " Margaret H. . Guest Fishers Island SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 9, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from November 30, 1991 to May 30, 1992. Please note that this will be the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, wTl�it/1 � � �� Bennett Orlowski, Jr. "l Chairman MATTHEWS & HAM P� ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW /"6y 5 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAIKPTON,N.Y.n968 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-IO76 STEPHEN L.HAM,III November 18, 1991 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret Guest (SCTM # 1000 - 6 - 1 - 5) Dear Board Members: Sketch plan approval for the referenced minor subdivision currently expires on November 30, having been extended to that date by your resolution of June 4, 1991. I am writing to request a further six-month extension of that approval. As you are aware, you have required a Stage I Assessment on this property and my clients have received an estimate for the study in excess of $10, 000. In a recent conversation with one of your outside environmental consultants, I was advised that a study could be conducted by a qualified individual for approximately half that amount. If the assessment can be done for the lower figure, 'my clients may be interested in pursuing the subdivision. Obviously, however, we . will not be able to satisfy your conditions prior to November 30. I have been advised that, even though you will not meet again until December 9, you can grant the extension based upon a letter received before the expiration date. Please adopt another resolution extending the approval for this subdivision for an additional six months. If you require any further information or documentation, please advise me immediately. Very truly yours, G� l Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja U xX`.r �4 c�u�Tf1pL0 TOIh!td SCOTT L. HARRIS PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS k ;r Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ♦z :� !' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �' Richard G. Ward ` r�. t Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 June 6, 1991 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton,, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision of John & Margaret Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Tuesday, June 4, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from May 30, 1991 to November 30, 1991. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, 0,1616 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. S Chairman .MATTHEWS 8c HAM S ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-2 8 3 7 2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 STEPHEN L.HAM,III June 4, 1991 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; SCTM # 1000-6-1-5 Dear Board Members: Please extend the time within which final maps must be filed for the referenced minor subdivision to December 17, 1991. (Current sketch plan approval expires on June 17, 1991. ) In light of your response of May 17, 1991 to my letter of April 22, 1991, my clients are unsure as to whether they will proceed with the subdivision. However, since there is some chance that they will proceed with it and since it will obviously be impossible to comply with all of your requirements by June 17, the requested extension is necessary at this time. Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja TRANSMITTED BY TELECOPIER - MAILED BY REGULAR MAIL 'JUN AATTM:vEYS AND CauvS1 tons AT L4,.w / 0 RAmpTON-ROAD JCS SOUTRAXPTON,N.Y. 11968 �1f3•�S3^2�04 Pamwp B,NaT11Ews T-2LFCOT,11:R S16•257.1070 STEf•1iL1� L.❑A.� ffi June 4, 1991 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; SCTM # 1040-6-1-5__-- Dear Board. Merlbers: please extend the time within which final maps must be filed for the referenced minor subdivision to December 17, 1991. (Current sketch plan approval expires on June 17, 1991. ) in light of flour response of May 17, 1991 to my letter of April 22, 199i, my client-s are unsure as to whether they will a proceed wi�,h the subdivision. However, since there is some chance that they Vill proceed, with it and since it will obviously j be impassible to comply with all of your requirements by June 17, the requested extension is necessary at this time. i Very truly yours, I i Stephen L. Ham, III Y j SLH:ja TRANSMITTED BY TELECOPIER MAILED DY REGULAR MAIL i i HRU ,'LANNING BOARD MEMBERS � 3 a n. SCOTT L. HARRIS / Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman e °t` y, Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward ;' t Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 / Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD .Fax (516) 765-1823 May 17, 1991 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The Planning Board has reviewed your letter of April 22, 1991, in reference to the above mentioned subdivision. The Planning Board will not waive their previous request that your client comply with all recommendations included ,in the January 22, 1991, report from Cramer, Voorhis and Associates. Please contact this office if you have any further questions,' Ver truly �youts, Bennett Orlowski, Ir. 4*15 Chairman ANTONIA BOOTH P` Town Hall,53095 Main Road Town Historian ._; ,' j Southold,New York 11971 ;"f (516)765-1981 OFFICE OF THE HISTORIAN TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 23, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board P.O.Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski, I'm pleased that you copied me on the matter of an environmental impact study for a planned subdivision on Fishers Island which,in part, considers resources of historic or prehistoric importance. I look forward to receiving a copy of the entire study when it has been completed and very much appreciate your courtesy. Sincerely, / �� ' Antonia Booth Southold Town Historian P.S. Every time I walk by the space where the Planning Department map used to be and which is now filled with old photographs I bless you ! r t (1 MATTHEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 rile 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 STEPHEN L.HAM,III April 22, 1991 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; SCTM # 1000-6-1-5 Dear Board Members: I am writing on behalf of John and Margaret Guest in response to your letter of February 5, 1991 requesting compliance with the report of Cramer, Voorhis & Associates of January 22, 1991. Among other things, your consultants recommended that detailed grading and landscaping plans and a Cultural Resource Assessment, Stage I, be prepared for the subject premises. We request that you waive compliance with the recommendations of the Cramer, Voorhis report until such time as the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 3 on the Minor Subdivision Map apply for building permits to construct residences on their respective parcels. our request is based on the particular circumstances under which the subdivision is being proposed as well as the expense involved in the recommended Stage I Assessment. The Guests plan to give Lot 1 to their son and Lot 3 to their daughter; they do not intend to sell either Lot to a third party. Although there has been some discussion concerning construction on Lot 1, it may well be some time before either parcel is improved; indeed, it is possible that no one will apply for a building permit for either or both parcels for many years. Moreover, we have obtained a proposal and estimate .for_ the Stage I Assessment from John Pfeiffer who .is .familiar with, Fishers Island and well qualified to perform the Assessment. Due to the APR 3 Continued Planning Board April 22, 1991 Town of Southold Re: Guest Page 2 size of the property and the fact that the Assessment must cover both historic and pre-historic matters, Mr. Pfeiffer estimates that the Stage I alone will cost $9,875 and, of course, no assurances can be given that additional expenses involving archaeological and historical matters will not have to be incurred. Due to the great expense that would have to be incurred under circumstances where either or both of the vacant lots may not be improved for many years, waiving compliance with the Cramer, Voorhis recommendations until applications for building permits are made would be a prudent and economical resolution that would potentially have some benefits for the Town as well: By so structuring the timing of the required archaeological and historical studies and grading and landscaping plans, you will enable the applicants to achieve their goal of conveying the vacant lots to their children without undue expense. Since the owners of the vacant lots would have to comply with the then current requirements based upon the then current site conditions at the time they proposed to build, not only would the Town continue to maintain control over the preservation of natural and cultural resources, it would have the flexibility of addressing any special concerns that cannot now be foreseen. Finally, the additional expenses involved would be borne by those who will benefit from the new construction. The proposed restrictions on building on either Lot 1 or Lot 3 would, of course, be included in a Declaration filed with the County Clerk with the recording information prominently set forth on the final subdivision map. I could work out appropriate language with your staff and the Town Attorney. I appreciate your consideration of the matters set forth in this letter and look forward to receiving your response. Very truly yours, ,!St.ep en L. Ham, III SLH:ja APR 2 3 i991 I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ' ' SCOTT L: HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.; Chairman t%° . � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. •X- Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald j P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 4, 1991 Antonia S. Booth Southold Town Historian Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM#1000-6-1-5 Dear Mrs. Booth: L The Planning Board is reviewing a subdivision proposal for the above mentioned parcel. Enclosed is a copy of a report prepared by the Planning Board' s environmental consultant, part of which discussed resources of historic or prehistoric importance that may be located on this property. The Planning Board has asked the applicant to conduct a Cultural Resource Assessment, Stage I, to determine the significance of, and to document the historic resources found on site and to determine the potential existence of prehistoric resources. When this study has been completed, I will send you a copy. Please contact this office if you have any questions, concerns or information that may be of use to the Planning Board. Very truly yours, �, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS ;Ll January 22, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest &Margaret H Guest Crescent Avenue,Fishers Island Dear Benny: We have reviewed the map and the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part I for the above referenced project. In addition, we have carried out a site inspection on the above referenced project on January 15, 1991. Enclosed please a completely revised EAF Part I which has been prepared as a result of our investigations. Also is enclosed an EAF Part II which identifies the proposed project impacts and their magnitude. It is noted that there are four (4) categories in the EAF Part II where potential impacts have been identified. The following is a discussion of those potential impacts and our recommendations on the potential methods to reduce or avoid them. #1 -The Proposed Project Will Result in a Physical Change to the Project Site. The project site contains a significant proportion of areas with steep slopes. While the proposed houses are shown to be located in areas of relatively slight slopes, the potential exists that necessary grading for the house, driveway and landscaping areas could impact the steep slope areas. These impacts could be a result of direct alteration (grading, clearing, etc.) or from indirect causes (runoff). It is not considered that potential impacts will be significant if proper safeguards are designed into the project. It is therefore recommended that the Board consider requiring a detailed grading plan for the two (2) proposed houses, their driveways and landscaping areas. The grading plans should seek to minimize the amount of clearing on the sites). In addition all runoff from any impervious/semi-impervious surfaces (houses, driveways, etc.) should be directed to dry wells to avoid the potential impacts of erosion. #G - The Proposed Action Will Alter Drainage Flow or Patterns and/or Surface Water Runoff. (See discussions and recommendations above) Page 1 54,NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Review of Guest Project January 22,1991 #9 -The Proposed Action Will Affect Non-Threatened or Non-Endangered Species. The vegetation habitats found on the site can be divided into three (3) main groups: Maritime Forest; Freshwater Wetlands, and; Tidal Wetlands. It is not expected that there will be any significant impacts to the two (2) wetland habitats, provided that the potential impacts discussed above are mitigated. There are potential impacts to the Maritime Forest associated with the proposal. The forest habitat found on site contains a low tree/shrub canopy. The typical species found on the site are: bayberry, sumac, cherries, oaks and.various shrub and vine species. As noted most of the habitat's canopy is low (<10') and the trees are small 1n diameter. However, located within (or in the immediate area of) the proposed house on Lot#1 there is a white oak (Quercus alba) with a diameter of approximately 14". The specimen represents the largest tree on this site. It is our recommendation to the Board that this tree be located on the survey (flagged in the field with blue tape). The proposed house should then be relocated and provide sufficient a setback distance to avoid impacting this specimen. #12 - The Proposed Action May Impact Resources of Historic or Prehistoric Importance. During field inspections several old military installations were noted on the site as well as foundations and debris from other structures of unknown origins. The use of portions of Fishers Island as a military base is known and is an important part of the history of the island. While there is a basic knowledge and much remaining physical evidence of its use, the exact nature, importance and use of the many of the various installations are not known nor documented. The House on the proposed Lot #3 appears to be located directly on the foundation and debris of the structures of unknown origin. The old military installations appear to be located within the boundaries of Lot #2. In addition to the historic resources identified on site there is a significant potential that there are also prehistoric resources as well. All of Fishers Island has been identified as an area of"Intensive Aboriginal Habitation". The existing conditions on site further suggests that this property maybe extremely significant with regard to prehistoric resources. These conditions include the existence of potable water (freshwater wetlands), the proximity of the tidal waters for fishing and gathering and vantage points and protected shelter formed by the topography. The existence (or extent) of prehistoric resources is usually very difficult to determine without subsurface investigation. It is our recommendation that a Cultural Resource Assessment (CRA), Stage I, be. conducted to determine the significance of and document the historic resources found on site and to determine the potential existence of prehistoric resources. It is our understanding that the local historian also feels that such an assessment is appropriate. Upon completion of the CRA changes to the proposed project maybe CRAMER, VOORHIS, SSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND.PANG CONSULTANTS Page 2 V// ���\\ CCU CO . Review of Guest Project January 22,1991 appropriate to avoid significant impacts. These changes could include: alternate locations of the improvements on the site; covenanting areas to be preserved, and/or; as a last resort, further excavation and salvage of resources that maybe unavoidably lost. I hope the above information is helpful to you in your decision making process. If we can provide any additional information with regard to the above please feel free to contact US. Very truly yours, U-1?7k. Thomas W. Cramer, ASI.A Enclosures: CRAMER, VOORHI , &� SOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL�AND;:,'M � L�V��1G CONSULTANTS Page 3 � *a -ri r�if PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS S t `�' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman e `c '. 'x Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward _ t� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road � `�;;� Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 . Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 4, 1991 Charles. Ferguson, President Henry L. Ferguson Museum Fishers Island, New York 06390 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM*1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ferguson: The Planning Board is reviewing a subdivision proposal for the above mentioned parcel. Enclosed is a copy of a report prepared by the Planning Board' s environmental consultant, part of which discussed resources of historic or prehistoric importance that may be located on this property. The Planning Board has asked the applicant to conduct a Cultural Resource Assessment, Stage I, to determine the significance of, and to document the historic resources found on site and to determine the potential existence of prehistoric resources. When this study has been completed, I will send you a copy. Please contact this office if you have any questions, concerns or information that may be of use to the Planning Board. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. IWIs , Chairman Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS t;� ,.. fir.. � SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ® '� `` '�C- Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. y� t { Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 5, 1991 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 4, 1991. Be it RESOLVED to adopt the January 10, 1991 Suffolk County Planning Commission report with the following amendments (numbers correspond to numbers in report) : 1. To be amended to read: No lot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2 & 3. To remain as written. 4. To remain as written with the addition that the Liber and Page number of the filed document be stated on map. 5. To be omitted. 6 & 7. To remain as written. 8. To be amended to read: All prospective owners of lots within this subdivision shall be advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore, may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. Page 2 John and Margaret Guest Numbers 1,2,3 ,6,7 & 8 must be presented in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions in proper legal form. A copy of the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Town Attorney. Once approved, the documents must be filed in the Office of the County Clerk. Number 4 must be shown on the final map. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, �S Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. cc: SCPC UNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING January 10, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 7 el Mal Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest Easterly side of Crescent Avenue, West of Dolphin Avenue, Fishers Island, Town of Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on January 9, 1991, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following conditions: 1. No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 3. Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots 1, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision. 4. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office which affects lots in this subdivision. 5. The angular bend in the panhandle of Lot 1 shall be modified by a horizontal curve to insure that the panhandle will be capable, by itself, of accommodating emergency and service vehicles. VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. L.L. NEW YORK 11788 (S 1 6)360-51 92 �I 1 t Page -2- ---------------------=---------------------------------------------------------- 6. No new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. 7. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 8. All prospective owners of lots within this subdivision shall be advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore, may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. All residential structures that are erected within this subdivision shall be constructed using materials and techniques that will reduce interior noise levels in accordance with the recommendations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development or other authority that has promulgated standards for reduction of interior noise levels. The property owners and future lot owners of this subdivision shall be required to sign a letter of understanding and agreement that they are fully aware and accept the fact of aircraft overflights and resultant noise. The Commission also offers the following comments on the map for your use and consideration: 1. It is suggested that before approval is granted to this subdivision that the subdivider be required to submit this proposal to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for review to insure that the proposed subdivision will meet the requirements and standards of that agency. 2. The map of this minor subdivision should be filed in the office of the County Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available to the general public in a central office of official records. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning by FrAw g, Sr. Planner SubdivisiA Review Division File: S-SD-90-22 FD:mb cc: J. Baier, C.E., SCDPW PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS L' ►7l SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman + -- Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. s "='`:� Richard G. Ward _ `` ° Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald Y.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 5, 1991 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: John & Margaret Guest SCTM#1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 4, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this Type 1 action. Enclosed is a report from the Planning Board' s environmental consultant in reference to his review of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) . The Planning Board requests that you comply with all recommendations included in the report. Upon compliance with the above, the Planning Board will make their environmental determination. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS January 22, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest &Margaret H Guest Crescent Avenue,Fishers Island Dear Benny: We have reviewed the map and the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part I for the above referenced project. In addition,we have carried out a site inspection on the above referenced project on January 15, 1991. Enclosed please a completely revised EAF Part I which has been prepared as a result of our investigations. Also is enclosed an EAF Part II which identifies the proposed project impacts and their magnitude. It is noted that there are four (4) categories in the EAF Part II where potential impacts have been identified. The following is a discussion of those potential impacts and our recommendations on the potential methods to reduce or avoid them. #1 - The Proposed Project Will Result in a Physical Change to the Project Site. The project site contains a significant proportion of areas with steep slopes. While the proposed houses are shown to be located in areas of relatively slight slopes, the potential exists that necessary grading for the house, driveway and landscaping areas could impact the steep slope areas. These impacts could be a result of direct alteration (grading, clearing, etc.) or from indirect causes (runoff). It is not considered that potential impacts will be significant if proper safeguards are designed into the project. It is therefore recommended that the Board consider requiring a detailed grading plan for the two (2) proposed houses, their driveways and landscaping areas. The grading plans should seek to minimize the amount of clearing on the sites). In addition all runoff from any impervious/semi-impervious surfaces (houses, driveways, etc.) should be directed to dry wells to avoid the potential impacts of erosion. #6- The Proposed Action Will Alter Drainage Flow or Patterns and/or Surface Water Runoff. (See discussions and recommendations above) Page 1 54'NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 . .. ..... .......,.. ... . ...:: _ �.ten �,ti Review of Guest Project January 22,1991 #9 -The Proposed Action Will Affect Non-Threatened or Non-Endangered Species. The vegetation habitats found on the site can be divided into three (3) main groups: Maritime Forest; Freshwater Wetlands, and; Tidal Wetlands. It is not expected that there will be any significant impacts to the two (2)wetland habitats, provided that the potential impacts discussed above are mitigated. There are potential impacts to the Maritime Forest associated with the proposal. The forest habitat found on site contains a low tree/shrub canopy. The typical species found on the site are: bayberry, sumac, cherries, oaks and various shrub and vine species. As noted most of the habitat's canopy is low (<10') and the trees are small in diameter. However, located within (or in the immediate area of) the proposed house on Lot #1 there is a white oak (Quercus alba) with a diameter of approximately 14". The specimen represents the largest tree on this site. It is our recommendation to the Board that this tree be located on the survey (flagged in the field with blue tape). The proposed house should then be relocated and provide sufficient a setback distance to avoid impacting this specimen. #12 - The Proposed Action May Impact Resources of Historic or Prehistoric Importance. During field inspections several old military installations were noted on the site as well as foundations and debris from other structures of unknown origins. The use of portions of Fishers Island as a military base is known and is an important part of the history of the island. While there is a basic knowledge and much remaining physical evidence of its use, the exact nature, importance and use of the many of the various installations are not known nor documented. The House on the proposed Lot #3 appears to be located directly on the foundation and debris of the structures of unknown origin. The old military installations appear to be located within the boundaries of Lot #2. In addition to the historic resources identified on site there is a significant potential that there are also prehistoric resources as well. All of Fishers Island has been identified as an area of"Intensive Aboriginal Habitation". The existing conditions on site further suggests that this property maybe extremely significant with regard to prehistoric resources. These conditions include the existence of potable water (freshwater wetlands), the proximity of the tidal waters for fishing and gathering and vantage points and protected shelter formed by the topography. The existence (or extent) of prehistoric resources is usually very difficult to determine without subsurface investigation. It is our recommendation that a Cultural Resource Assessment (CRA), Stage I, be. conducted to determine the significance of and document the historic resources found on site and to determine the potential existence of prehistoric resources. It is our understanding that the local historian also feels that such an assessment is appropriate. Upon completion of the CRA changes to the proposed project maybe CRAMER, VOORHI &� SOCIATES ENVIRONMENT A�AND�I%/ ��NG CONSULTANTS Page 2 Review of Guest Project January 22,1991 appropriate to avoid significant impacts. These changes could include: alternate locations of the improvements on the site; covenanting areas to be preserved, and/or; as a last resort, further excavation and salvage of resources that maybe unavoidably lost. I hope the above information is helpful to you in your decision making process. If we can provide any additional information with regard to the above please feel free to contact US. Very truly yours, Thomas W. Cramer, ASLA Enclosures: \\ CRAMER, VO;U`RH 1* � SOCIATES ENVIRONMEN I AN' D. , G CONSULTANTS Page 3 14-16.2 (2ro7)-7c ^, 61711 SECIR Appendix A 4� State Environmental Cluallty Review � := FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant.The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition,many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: n Part 1 Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Minor subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest Name of Action Town of Southold Planning Board Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date Pwni 1—PROJECT INFORMATI06 Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may ha:: a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considers% as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additions. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION _ Minor subdivision of John S Guest & Margaret H. Guest LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Munlclpallty and County) Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island, Suffolk County NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest ( 516) 283-2400 ADDRESS c/o Stephen L. Ham, III, Esq. CITYlPO STATE ZIP CODE 45 Hampton Road, Southampton , NY 111968 NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( 1 ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Minor subdivision into three lots of 13.7 acre parcel. Lot 2 has existing residence and sanitary systems. Residences and sanitary systems will eventually be constructed on Lots 1 and 3. There will be no disturbance to the topography or vegetation within 100 feet of the wetlands. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. . 1. Present land use: ❑Urban DInclustrial OCommercial OResidential (suburban) )MRural (non-farm) OForest OAgriculture 00ther 2. Total acreage of project area: 13 .7 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE , PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Nor.-agricultural) 12-09 acres _ 10.58 acres Forested 0 acres 0 acres Agricultural (includes orchards. cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 59 acres 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres .59 acres Water Surface Area 0 acres 0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 77 acres 0 _ acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres 1 _26 acres Other (Indicate type) Landscaping .25 acres 1.27 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Es, ReC, RpE, RdC, Mu, HaB a. Soil drainage: X®Well drained 100 % of site OModerately well drained % of site OPoorly drained % of site, b. If any agricultural land is involve how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N'" Land Classification System? N acre_ 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes XONo a. What is depth to bedrock? +/- 600 (in feet) S. App(oximate percentage of proposed pr .e with slopes: )M0.10% 20 X310.15% 30 % 13,15% or greater n % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? OYes XUNo* *Historic resources located on site, potential . 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on�ie Kegister ocf'National Natural Landmarks? OYes X$BNo* 8. What is the depth of the water table? * (in feet) *test hole dug to 16' without finding water. 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? XMes ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? XMes ONo* 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes XSNo According to J.M.O. Consulting & CVA Identify each species 12'. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) XQYes ❑No Describe Bluffs along Fishers Island Sound & area is a high point in the area. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes XE5No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? X12Yes ONo *General character is one of rural open space. 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name unnamed wetlands b Size (In acres) •59 acres 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? XUYes ONo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? X-Yes `:No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? CYes XTNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? OYes XX_XNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? XMes []No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? '—Yes XXXNo Unknown B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 13.7 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.51 , acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 11.17 acres. contained within three lots d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 3 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially One (existing) Ultimately Three 3 70' 9enth. 1 & 3g��1 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height: 7n in5�width. 1 g j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 0 it respect. 3 2. How much natural material (i.e.. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? 30Yes ONo ON/A Landscaping a. If yes, for what intend . purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONo C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes ONo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 1.51 acres. S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? • ❑Yes ONo *Oak tree - large diameter in area of proposed house lot R. 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? DYes ONo B. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes X®No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 20 after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? DYes X®No If yes, explain - 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes XE)No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? XRNYes ONo Type - sewage 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? DYes UNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes XXBNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? XENes DNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month .34 tons/month. b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes ONo c. If yes, give name Town landfill ; location N/A d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes XMNo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? X®Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? .34 tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? unknown years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes UNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes X®No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes XMlo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? XDYes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) home heating oil & electrical 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/day. *includes 1 existing house. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? DYes XnNo If Yes, explain 25-4pprovals Required �. Submittal Type Date City, Town. Village Board OYes )ONO City, Town, Village Planning Board UYes ONO Subdivision approval 03/90 City, Town Zoning Board 1 OYes XMNo Article 6 unknown City, County Health Department )MYes ONO Other Local Agencies OYes XMNo Other Regional Agencies OYes X®No State Agencies )SYes ONO N.Y.S.D.E.0.Article 24 & 25 06/90 Federal Agencies Oyes XI;DNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? XOYes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment Ozoning variance ❑special use permit X�ffsubdivision Osite plan Onewlrevision of master plan Oresource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-80 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 5 single family residences 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? same 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? UYes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? Single family residential; zone R-80 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? X3Yes ONO 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? three - acres + a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 3. / 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? OYes X3No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police. fire protection)? )MYes ONO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? XX]Yes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? OYes XBNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? OYes - ONO D.. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may i o clarify your project If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please di mpacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification 1 certify that the information provided at to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor yI°hn S. and Margaret H. Guest Date Signatur �/f�/ Title �A - /X��Ta�-►T /� .UitiC�L '� l�- If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you art; Late agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2—PRI W IMPACTS AND THEIR AAA fi DE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and At terminations been reasonablei The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the-threshold of • magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. -- .- c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the Impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is,not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND _ Moderate Large Mitigated By 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the pro We? Impact Project ChangeONO ES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 C'J ❑ .1❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. n ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. •.Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect t!. _.,y unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ONO OYES • Specific land forms: Bluffs are located along Fishers ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No Island Sound. 6 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potentlal Can Impact Be 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By p p° y g p. Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 13, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conse ation Law, ECL) CaNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 z \, • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ _-❑Yes ONo S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater, quality or quantity? ONO OYES Exampks that would apply tq column 2 • Proposed Action will require a' discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed(project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping Capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑yo do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likel" Cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ El Yes' ENo existing body of water t%J th=r%tent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No JWill proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO OYES Ezzmples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ L, ❑Yes ❑No 7 1 2 3 Small to Potentlal Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mltlpated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. / ❑ Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No •,Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed S lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: D ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? 0N0 OYES Examples that %#ould apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? 0N0 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or 0 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important 19 vegetation. /� LA+ Si�:acc O - ►5 ?,ace s-ps IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ,QNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 l • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No , { land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 I-W 2 _3.. Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact . Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more . than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. . . . ... _ . • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased ruhoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCE 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? NO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in%Se tion 617,21. Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whetlur' man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-" historic or paleontological importance? ONO /.AYES Examples that would apply to column 2 \ • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility of site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. �,�/ • Other impacts: Historic resources located on site, ❑ /t: yes ❑No potential prehistoric. IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? f Examples that would apply to column 2 NO OYES { ?The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational o0 rtunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No � A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ' • Other impacts: 0 0 ❑Yes ❑No z IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation sy{tems? Moderate Large Mitigated By /ONO OYES Impact Impact Protect Change Examples that would apply to column 2 _ • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's so rces/of fuel or energy supply? NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ D Dyes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration,as a result of the Proposed Action? ZINO - OYES r Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local Q _ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N( substances(i.e. oil, pesticides,chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON. form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid r.r hazardous waste. � � ❑Yes ❑N • Other impacts: 10 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 1e Will proposed action affect the character of the exist' g community? Impact Impact Project Change ' NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 r • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No project is located is likely�;to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget foj.::capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more tha'a S% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will con lict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cau a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will repl a or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic impo' nce to the community. • Development will create,�.,demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and '#re, etc.) • Proposed Action will setltn important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ . ❑Yes ❑No 19 J!'Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to i potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO OYES If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS ;. Responsibility of Lead Agency Part Z must be prepared H.one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impacts) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project changes; 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability:of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) , 11 CRAMER, V RH ::::e OCIATES P ENVIRONMEN G CONSULTANTS T * Awl i� January 22, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest &Margaret H Guest Crescent Avenue,Fishers Island Dear Benny: We have reviewed the map and the Environmental Assessment Form(EAF) Part I for the above referenced project. In addition,we have carried out a site inspection on the above referenced project on January 15, 1991. Enclosed please a completely revised EAF Part I which has been prepared as a result of our investigations. Also is enclosed an EAF Part II which identifies the proposed project impacts and their magnitude. It is noted that there are four (4) categories in the EAF Part II where potential impacts have been identified. The following is a discussion of those potential impacts and our recommendations on the potential methods to reduce or avoid them. #1 - The Proposed Project Will Result in a Physical Change to the Project Site. The project site contains a significant proportion of areas with steep slopes. While the proposed houses are shown to be located in areas of relatively slight sloes, the potential exists that necessary grading for the house, driveway and landscaping areas could impact the steep slope areas. These impacts could be a result of direct alteration (grading, clearing, etc.) or from indirect causes (runoff). It is not considered that potential impacts will be significant if proper safeguards are designed into the project. It is therefore recommended that the Board consider requiring a detailed grading plan for the two (2)proposed houses, their driveways and landscaping areas. The grading plans should seek to minimize the amount of clearing on the site(s). In addition all runoff from any impervious/semi-impervious surfaces (houses, driveways, etc.) should be directed to dry wells to avoid the potential impacts of erosion. #6-The Proposed Action Will Alter Drainage Flow or Patterns and/or Surface Water Runoff. (See discussions and recommendations above) JAN 2 g 1991 Page 1 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 r- Review of Guest Project January 22,1991 #9 -The Proposed Action Will Affect Non-Threatened or Non-Endangered Species. The vegetation habitats found on the site can be divided into three (3) main groups: Maritime Forest; Freshwater Wetlands, and;Tidal Wetlands. It is not expected that there will be any significant impacts to the two (2)wetland habitats,provided that the potential impacts discussed above are mitigated. There are potential impacts to the Maritime Forest associated with the proposal. The forest habitat found on site contains a low tree/shrub canopy. The typical species found on the site are: bayberry, sumac, cherries, oaks and various shrub and vine species. As noted most of the habitat's canopy is low (<10') and the trees are small in diameter. However, located within(or in the immediate area of) the proposed house on Lot#1 there is a white oak (Quercus alba)with a diameter of approximately 14". The specimen represents the largest tree on this site. It is our recommendation to the Board that this tree be located on the survey(flagged in the field with blue tape). The proposed house should then be relocated and provide sufficient a setback distance to avoid impacting this specimen. #12 -The Proposed Action May Impact Resources of Historic or Prehistoric Importance. During field inspections several old military installations were noted on the site as well as foundations and debris from other structures of unknown origins. The use of portions of Fishers Island as a military base is known and is an important part of the history of the island. While there is a basic knowledge and much remaining physical evidence of its use, the exact nature, importance and use of the many of the various installations are not known nor documented. The House on the proposed Lot #3 appears to be located directly on the foundation and debris of the structures of unknown origin. The old military installations appear to be located within the boundaries of Lot #2. In addition to the historic resources identified on site there is a significant potential that there are also prehistoric resources as well. All of Fishers Island has been identified as an area of"Intensive Aboriginal Habitation". The existing conditions on site further suggests that this property maybe extremely significant with regard to prehistoric resources. These conditions include the existence of potable water (freshwater wetlands), the proximity of the tidal waters for fishing and gathering and vantage points and protected shelter formed by the topography. The existence (or extent) of prehistoric resources is usually very difficult to determine without subsurface investigation. It is our recommendation that a Cultural Resource Assessment (CRA), Stage I, be conducted to determine the significance of and document the historic resources found on site and to determine the potential existence of prehistoric resources. It is our understanding that the local historian also feels that such an assessment is appropriate. Upon completion of the CRA changes to the proposed project maybe CRAMER, V R SOCIATES ENVIRONMENT �G CONSULTANTS Page 2 s Review of Guest Project January 22,1991 appropriate to avoid significant impacts. These changes could include: alternate locations of the improvements on the site; covenanting areas to be preserved, and/or; as a last resort, further excavation and salvage of resources that maybe unavoidably lost. I hope the above information is helpful to you in your decision making process. If we can provide any additional information with regard to the above please feel free to contact US. Very Vuly yours, Thomas W. Cramer, ASI.A Enclosures: CRAMER, V R SOCIATES ENVIRONMENT / G CONSULTANTS Page 3 14.16.2 (2ro7)-7c - - a17.21 - SEOR Appendix A r State Environmental Ouality Review 0281991 FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORMr 1 �_ Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderiy manner; whether' a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there.are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts. Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifyij g basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: D Part 1 Part 2 DPart 3 Upon review of.the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. :_ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Minor subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest Name of Action Town of Southold Planning Board Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may ha.c a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considers,* as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additions. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Minor subdivision of John S Guest & Margaret H. Guest LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) i Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island, Suffolk County NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE" John S. 'Guest & Margaret H. Guest ( 516) 283-2400 ADDRESS c/o Stephen L. Ham, III, Esq. CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE 45 Hampton Road, Southampton, NY 111968 NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( 1 ADDRESS CITWPO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Minor subdivision into three lots of 13.7 acre parcel. Lot 2 has existing residence and sanitary systems. Residences and sanitary systems will eventually be constructed on Lots 1 and 3. There will be no disturbance to the topography or vegetation within 100 feet of the wetlands. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial DCommercial DResidential (suburban) 4)Rural (non-farm) DForest DAgriculture DOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 13 .7 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Nor.-agricultural) 12 •09 acres 10.58 acres Forested 0 acres 0 acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres .59 acres Water Surface Area 0 acres 0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 77 acres 1 2 acres Other (Indicate type) Landscaping •25 acres 1.2 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Es, ReC, RpE, RdC, Mu, HaB a. Soil drainage:' XMWell drained 100 % of site DModerately well drained % of site OPoorly drained % of site, b. If any agricultural land is involveAhow many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N` Land Classification Systems acre- ;gee 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes XMNo a. What is depth to bedrock? +/- 600 (in feet) S. App(oximate percentage of proposed projec eb with slopes: Z0.10% 20 )010.1S% 30 % 015% or greater Sn % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? OYes X0No* *Historic resources located on site, potential rehistori 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on i e Register ocf'National Natural Landmarks? OYes X046* 8. What is the depth of the water table? * (in feet) *test hole dug to 16' without finding water. 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? XUYes ❑No . 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? XMes ONo' 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes . AnNo According to J.M.O. Consulting & CVA Identify each species 12'. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) XUYes ❑No Describe Bluffs along Fishers Island Sound & area is a high point in the area. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes X23No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? XIRYes ONo *General character is one of rural open space. 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:. a. Name unnamed wetlands b Size (In acres) .59 acres 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? . X19Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? XX]Yes No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? OYes X91No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets law, Article 25-AA. Section 303 and 304? Oyes XX_XNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR.617? XMYes ONo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? '—Yes XXXNo Unknown B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 13.7 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.51 , acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 11.17 acres. contained within three lots d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion. indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %: f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 3 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially One (existing) Ultimately Three 351 701, 90� i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure S height: -7n width; i nm ength. 1 & 3 j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 0 ft. respect. 3 2. How much natural material (i.e.. rock. earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes ONo ON/A Landscaping a. If yes. for what intend . purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes . ONo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? 1.51 acres. S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? OYes'. ONo *Oak tree - large diameter in area of proposed house lot R. 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated NSA (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes x®No 9. Number of jobs generated: during.construction 20 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?. Dyes X®No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes XI)No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste. disposal involved? XMes ONo Type sewage 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes X3No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes XX3No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? XMes ONo a. If yes, what is the amount per month .34 tons/month. b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? )QYes ONo c. If yes, give name Town landfill ; location N/A d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes XMNo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? x®Yes ONo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? •34 tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? unknown years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes 43No 19. Will project routinely.produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes x®No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? OYes XMNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? xfkYes DNo If yes , indicate type(s) home heating oil & electrical 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/day. *includes 1 existing house. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? DYes XONo If Yes, explain M .Approval* Required: - Submittal Type Date City, Town. Village Board Oyes )ONo City, Town, Village Planning Board UYes ONo Subdivision approval 03/90 City, Town Zoning Board l OYes MNo Article 6 unknown City, County Health Department )MYes ONo Other Local Agencies OYes VINO Other Regional Agencies OYes X®No State A*encies >OYes ONo N.Y.S.D.E.0.Article 24 & .25 06/90 Federal Agencies Oyes XIDNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed. action involve a planning or zoning decision? YZYes ONo If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment Ozoning variance ❑special use permit X)ffsubdivision Osite plan Onew/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2: What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-80 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 5 single family residences ' 4.' What is the proposed zoning of the site? same 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is .the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? X3Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? Single family residential; zone R-80 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? )OYes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? three a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 3.7 +/— acres 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? OYes )ONo 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police. fire protection)? )MYes ONo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? XX]Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? OYes X$No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes - ONo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may t. o clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please di mpacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification 1 certify that the information provided al. to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor S. and Margaret H. Guest Date Signatur '� Title CU4 To l�"WW,,'-e. a� If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you art: >.ite agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2—PROJE, IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNI DE ResponsiblHty of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and A--terminations been reasonable) The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The Impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. _ d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND - _ Moderate Large Mitigated By f-mpai,�t Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the pro sib ONO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 � • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ L��JYes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. 0 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. *.Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ (Dyes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect tc. _.iy unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ONO OYES • Specific land forms: Bluffs are located along Fishers ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Island Sound. 8 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under.Articles 15, 24. 25 of the Environmental Conse atiorS law, ECL) �PNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of. site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of.utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or'new body of water? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ QYes ❑No S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO DYES Exampks that would apply t4 column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ - ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to.serve proposed(project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply'from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping Capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water Q Cl ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyer off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑. CYes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes QNo day. • Proposed Action will likel- cause siltation. or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes GNo existing body of watt► the xieni that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: O D ❑Yes ONo I JWill proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or ,surface water runoff? ONO OYES Exu:nples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 7 1 2 a Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. / ❑ kes ONO • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ A,Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No •,Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? XNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other .impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS r� 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endain a ed' species? O . OYES Examples that viould apply to column • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes .❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONo 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? (aNO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. A. LA"4r- is L,zc`,- . 4. or--`TE,i-s: P;�+� ke)L-3�,L evv v IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? /QNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ' _ land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potentlal Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mltlgated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural d ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land management systems(e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip croppingr or create a need for such measures(e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCE 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? O OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum j %Se tion 617.21, Appendix B) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from O ❑ ❑Yes ONO or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land 'uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: - ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of histo 'c, pre-'- historic or paleontological importance? ONO 11ES Examples that would apply to column 2 .X • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO contiguous to any facility of site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the D ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: Historic resources located on site, ❑ /� Xyes ONO potential prehistoric. _ IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? _ Examples that would apply to column 2 O OYES { ?The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational o rtunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO "C A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: 0 0 ❑Yes ONO 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation sy temsl' Moderate Large Mitigated By /RNO OYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Q ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 1S. Will proposed action affect the community's solrces/of fuel or energy supply? NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use.of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major,commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration,as a .result of the Proposed Action? QNO - OYES" Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ OYes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the .local O ,. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No substances(i.e.oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes . ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable'liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N0� within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid nr hazardous waste. . ❑ ❑Yes DNo • Other impacts: ❑ 10 Ir 1 2 3 IMPACT ON dROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 1s Will proposed action affect the character of the exist' g c mmunity? Impact Impact lProjectChangs DYES I Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent populatioft'of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located'is likely„to grow by more than S%. •• The municipal budget foh.I.capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than.S% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will on ict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cau,n a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will repl' e or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic impo nce to the community. • Development will create.' demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police anfl re, etc.) • Proposed Action will setV. n important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No redo a or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes DNo • Proposed Action will c • Other impacts: ^� ❑ D : ❑Yes DNo 19.il1s there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to `potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO OYES If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—:EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS A Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared it'!one or more impact(:) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for !' ch impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probabilityi of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 I t1wUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING January 10, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 241991 Town of Southold Planning Board f Main Road _ Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest Easterly side of Crescent Avenue, West of Dolphin Avenue, Fishers Island, Town of Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on January 9, 1991, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. After due study and deliberation it resolved to. approve said map subject to the following conditions: 1. No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 3. Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots 1, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision. 4. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office which affects lots in this subdivision. 5. The angular bend in the panhandle of Lot 1 shall be modified by a horizontal curve to insure that the panhandle will be capable, by itself, of accommodating emergency and service vehicles. VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, L.L. NEW YORK 11788 (51 6)360-51 92 e A � Page -2- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. No new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. 7. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be discharged down the face of the ,bluff. 8. All prospective owners of lots within this subdivision shall be advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore, may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. All residential structures that are erected within this subdivision shall be constructed using materials and techniques that will reduce interior noise levels in accordance with the recommendations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development or other authority that has promulgated standards for reduction of interior noise levels. The property owners and future lot owners of this subdivision shall be required to sign a letter of understanding and agreement that they are fully aware and accept the fact of aircraft overflights and resultant noise. The Commission also offers the following comments on the map for your use and consideration: 1. It is suggested that before approval is granted to this subdivision that the subdivider be required to submit this proposal to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for review to insure that the proposed subdivision will meet the requirements and standards of that agency. 2. The map of this minor subdivision should be filed in the office of the County Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available to the general public in a central office of official records. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning by FrAnkDo4w+44g, Sr. Planner Subdivisi Review Division File: S-SD-90-22 FD:mb cc: J. Baier, C.E. , SCDPW =y- f PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS t. -,.. ':. zi ► SCOTT L. HARRIS t� =' � :$. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman c3� `ti:; tx "� �"�:':��' � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �l ° Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1991 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM41000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The enclosed report dated January 10, 1991, from the Suffolk County Planning Commission will be reviewed at the Planning Board' s February 4, 1991 public meeting. You are not required to attend this meeting. Please note that this report is for your information only. It has not been adopted by the Planning Board. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. SCPC Report �..:rU.NTY OF SUFFOLK �u�3GiG� a AlK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK.COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR.H. KUN7 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING January 10, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - John S. Guest & Margaret H. .Guest Easterly side of Crescent Avenue, West of Dolphin Avenue, Fishers Island, Town of Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on January 9, 1990, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following conditions: 1. No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 3. Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots 1, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision. 4. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office which affects lots in this subdivision. 5. The angular bend in the panhandle of Lot 1 shall be modified by a horizontal curve to insure that the panhandle will be capable, by itself, of accommodating emergency and service vehicles. VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. L.I.,NEW YORK 11788 (516)360-5192 - - - Page -2- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. No new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. 7. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 8. All prospective owners of lots within this subdivision shall be advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore, may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. All residential structures that are erected within this subdivision shall be constructed using materials and techniques that will reduce interior noise levels in accordance with the recommendations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development or other authority that has promulgated standards for reduction of interior noise levels. The property owners and future lot owners of this subdivision shall be required to sign a letter of understanding and agreement that they are fully aware and accept the fact of aircraft overflights and resultant noise. The Commission also offers the following comments on .the map for your use and consideration: 1. It is suggested that before approval is granted to this subdivision that the subdivider be required to submit this proposal to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for review to insure that the proposed subdivision will meet the requirements and standards of that agency. 2. The map of this minor subdivision should be filed in the office of the County Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available to the general public in a central office of official records. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning byA Frl g, Sr. Planner Subdivisi� Review Division File: S-SD-90-22 FD:mb cc: J.. Baier, C.E., SCDPW PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS O� '� SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman _ Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. `'r. ti Richard G. Ward , Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1991 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM*1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board rescind their resolution of December 17, 1990., which started the Lead Agency coordination process on this application as an unlisted action. The parcel is located within a Critical Environmental Area and is thus classified as a Type I action. BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Board started the Lead Agency coordination process on December 19, 1990, classifying this as a Type I action. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, (U Bennett Orlowski, Jr. S Chairman F t� Ci UNTY OF SUFFOLK lek PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING January 10, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest Easterly side of Crescent Avenue, West of Dolphin Avenue, Fishers Island, Town of Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on January 9, 1990, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following conditions: 1. No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 3. Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots 1, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision. 4. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office which affects lots in this subdivision. 5. The angular bend in the panhandle of Lot 1 shall be modified by a horizontal curve to insure that the panhandle will be capable, by itself, of accommodating emergency and se'rvice ;vehicles,: VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY -' JAN 14 1991 HAUPPAUGE, L.I., NEW YORK 11788 (516)360-5192 --- Page -2- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. No new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. 7. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 8. All prospective owners of lots within this subdivision shall be advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore, may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. All residential structures that are erected within this subdivision shall be constructed using materials and techniques that will reduce interior noise levels in accordance with the recommendations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development or other authority that has promulgated standards for reduction of interior noise levels. The property owners and future lot owners of this subdivision shall be required to sign a letter of understanding and agreement that they are fully aware and accept the fact of aircraft overflights and resultant noise. The Commission also offers the following comments on the map for your use and consideration: 1. It is suggested that before approval is granted to this subdivision that the subdivider be required to submit this proposal to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for review to insure that the proposed subdivision will meet the requirements and standards of that agency. 2. The map of this minor subdivision should be filed in the office of the County Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available to the general public in a central office of official records. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning by FrAkDw g, Sr. Planner Subdivisidfi Review Division File: S-SD-90-22 FD:mb cc: J. Baier, C.E. , SCDPW MATTHEWS 8c HAM `t�S ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 STEPHEN L.HAM,III January 7, 1991 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5) Dear Melissa: In connection. with the referenced minor subdivision application and pursuant to the request in the Planning Board's letter to me of December 13, 1990, I have enclosed my clients' check to the Town of Southold for $400 in payment of the Board's environmental consultant's fee. As you know, this application was held up for a considerable period of time last year by departments other than the Planning Board. We would therefore greatly appreciate your continued cooperation in keeping the review process moving forward as expeditiously as possible. Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja Enclosure JAN ` 8 199i 14-16 2 (2/87)-7c 1 617.21 SEAR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant.The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information fo.fit a projector action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 []Part 3 CUpon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2.and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information,'and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer ( Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFC..:.IATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island, Suffolk County NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (516 )283-2400 ADDRESS c/o Stephen L. Ham, III, Esq. CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE 45 Hampton Road, Southampton NY 11968 NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Minor subdivision into three lots of 13 .7-acre parcel. Lot 2 has existing residence and sanitary systems. Residences and sanitary systems will eventually be constructed on Lots 1 and 3 . There will be no disturbance to the topography or vegetation within 100 feet of the wetlands. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ®Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture []Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 13.7 acres. lot 1 lot 3 lot 1 lot 3 APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 3.68 3.0 acres 3,68 � 0 acres Forested 0 0 acres 0 0 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 0 acres 0 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0.02 0.32 acres 0.02 0.32 acres Water Surface Area 0 0 acres 0 0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 0 acres 0 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 0 acres 0 0 acres Other (Indicate type) 0 0 acres 0 0 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? please note test hole data a. Soil drainage: ®Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes MNo a. What is depth to bedrock? —600— (in feet) 2 - , ,. 5. Approximate percentage of proposed 1ct site with slopes: ®0-1° 00 �0% 1 ❑l0-15% ❑15/° or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes ®No C '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ®No 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) * test hole dug to 16 ' without finding water 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ®Yes ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ®Yes ❑No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes IANo According to J.M.O. Consulting Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ®Yes ❑No Describe Bluffs along Fishers Island. Sound 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes K]No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes []No unknown 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name „nnamPr1 b. Size (In acres) less than 2 acre 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? K]Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [R]Yes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes ®No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes MNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ®Yes ❑No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes )[]No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 13.7 acres. (lots l and 3 b. Project acreage ,to be developed: 0.16/0.14 acres initially; 0 .1 6/0 1 4 acres ultimately-respectively) C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 3.54/4.16 acres.(lots 1 and 3 respectively) d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: (each lot) One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially one Ultimately one L Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35' height; 70'/70' width;10 'S respe /90'len th. spe 1 and 3 g ctively) j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 0 ft. 3 J� 2. How much natural Col (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removeffi*m the site? 0 tons/cubip yarns, 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ONo ®N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONo 4. How.many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0.14/0.16 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 ears old) or other local (to be removed3b respectively) ro ectt?y) Y y-important vegetation y project? ❑Yes ®No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ONo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 20 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes IX]No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ®No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? LNYes ONo Type sewage 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ®No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes RINo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ®Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month 0.35 tons / house b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ®Yes ONo c. If yes, give name Town landfill ; location N/A d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes X]No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Yes ONo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 0.35 tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? unknown years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes 91No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes ®No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes X]No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Ikes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) _ home heating oil & electrical 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day unknown gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes ®No . If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes 9No City, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ❑No subdivision approval 3/90 City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ®No City, County Health Department MYes ❑No Article 6 unknown Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ®No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ®No State Agencies rDYes ❑No N.Y.S.D.E.C. Article 24 & 25 6/90 Federal Agencies ❑Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? MYes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit (lsubdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-80 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 5 single family residences 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? same 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? MYes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/, mile radius of proposed action? single family residential; Zone R-80 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/ mile? MYes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? three a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 3.7± acres 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes K]No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? WYes ❑No indirectly by increasing density of site to three single— family residences from one a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? NYes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes nNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ( Applicant/Sponsor Nam John S Guest and Margaret H. Guest Date December 14, 1990 Signature B ,C,- HIM.,ZE ' Title Authorized Agent If the action is in the Coastal Area,and you are a statelagency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 ..""if-PROJECT IMPACTS AND Tk�'_)R MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. ` Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 �( Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Impact Impact Project Change ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ El El Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. _ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No 2. Will there be an effect v. ...iy ur..que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO OYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 - 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15,24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ El Yes El No C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not 0 El Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed ,Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No existing body of water to the exte;,,t that there will be an obvious visual contrast to naturai conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 7 C J 2 3 S to Potential Can Impact Be Mo`L_,ate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ . DYes ONO • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ h ❑ ❑Yes ONO our. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ refuse per hour. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ -.V- heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ to industrial use. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO ! IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑ ❑Yes ONO Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ' Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other El ❑Yes ONO than for agricultural purposes. ❑ ID Yes ❑No ' Other impacts: ❑ ! ❑ ❑Yes ONO �. ' Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ❑ El Yes ONO Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ I`•� of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important ❑Yes ONO vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) ❑ ❑Yes ONO . 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action.would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO [DYES The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 9 IMPACT ONSPORTATIO 2 NRA 3 N Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large 'Mitigated By Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES Impact Impact Project Change • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. El• Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ Y� transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family ❑ Yes ❑No 3 residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes []No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. El ❑Yes ❑No • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ �- • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑,yo ' Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that w ould act as a noise screen. ❑ El Dyes []No ' Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No - IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of ❑ Dyes ❑No accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. i Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, El Yes ❑No infectious, etc.) I Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONOi Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous El ❑Yes ❑NO waste. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No I 10 x,,u PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �' s SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward d' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S: McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 1990 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of .this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6, NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: SG-C-M +3• t000 Requested Action: vlSiv'P-' OX r' "7 acre cPgrc-a. SEQRA Classification: ( >C ) Type I ( ) Unlisted ° Contact Person: 6 i2� ( 516) -765-1 38 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (7( ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: .Beard a f- rpp , rs- Bearer of Trustees Southold Town Board .Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services ,9.NYSDEC - Stony Brook S.C. Dept. 6f PublIG WGr-kS N U. Q. D..S. A my 7 {$rp etf—E.. .r�zn ,__.. .Y. ep C�.-e- �ii" •• •-emu tz rTr- .`�ir v i * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS <<' Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �� = Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 20, 1990 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: Please note that the above mentioned subdivision is located in a Critical Environmental Area, and is thus classified as a Type 1 action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The Planning Board' s December 17, 1990, resolution incorrectly classified this action as an Unlisted action. The resolution will be officially corrected at the. Planning Board' s January 14, 1991, meeting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. ver truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 5 Chairman ..yr ylY y ssr PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS _ 'k SCOTT L. HARRIS ry "r4y. �7 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ` lj ;'- Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. � Richard G. Ward a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 18, 1990 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest SCTM* 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 17, 1990. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the Lead Agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated November 30, 1990, with the following condition: 1. The upland area of each lot must be stated on the map: Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. Five ( 5) paper prints and two ( 2) mylars of the final map, containing a current stamp of Health Department approval, must. be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. Page 2 John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest The Planning Board has referred this subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their- review. You will be notified should any covenants and restrictions be required. Please do not hesitate to contact this .office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, att'�� /��? , Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS n SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman eb'�q � .. ` � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 7 ecernbere- ( q ,19 90 Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk // County Planning Commission: Map of - `1a1.,�y Yves .. lfiovsofe 1)eSt Hamlet/Locality jSheQ� .L5�a1NQ S.C.D.P.W. Topo No. : Zoning RIFO S.C. Tax Map No. : I Major Sub. Minor Sub. Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: PreHmi7nary Plat ( 3 copies) �<_Road Profiles (1) Drainage Plans (1) Topogroaphical Map (1) Site Plan (1) Grading Plan ,(1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet _ CONTINUED REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an (Unlisted) Type I ) (Type II) Action. 2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3 . E.I.S. statement enclosed. (yes) no) 4. The proposed division has received approval from the S.C. Dept. of Health. (Yes) o) COMMENTS: We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) (no) Referral received 19 by Suffolk County Planning Commission and assigned File No. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. rn9s CHAIRMAN Jt revised: 3/8/89 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk 'County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation .excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads . (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman e3° `: "� '. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �! �n { ' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (5 l 6) 765-1823 December 13 , 1990 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Major Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr.- Ham: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $400.00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of Long Environmental Assessment Forms. The above mentioned sum must be paid in full by your client before we can authorize our consultant to proceed with the review. The check should be made payable to the Town of Southold. When the consultants complete their review, the Planning Board will consider their findings in making a determination of whether the project will have a significant environmental impact. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. -InIs Chairman MATTHEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD So=AMPToN,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 STEPHEN L.HAM,III December 14, 1990 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attn. : Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; (SCTM # 1000 - 6 - 1 - 5) Dear Melissa: Enclosed is a Full Environmental Assessment Form for the referenced minor subdivision. I have completed Part 1 in accordance with your instructions. Please keep me advised of any developments in the review process. Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja Enclosure DEC 1 7 �;--� PART 1—PROJECT Mr-IMATION ,. Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere as part of the application for approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition; information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island, Suffolk County NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (516 )283-2400 ADDRESS c/o Stephen L. Ham, III, Esq. CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE 45 Hampton Road, Southampton NY 11968 NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Minor subdivision into three lots of 13 .7—acre parcel. Lot 2 has existing residence and sanitary systems. Residences and sanitary systems will eventually be constructed on Lots 1 and 3 . There will be no disturbance to the topography or vegetation within 100 feet of the wetlands. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overalIproject, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial. ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ®Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 13.7 acres. lot 1 lot 3 lot 1 lot 3 APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 3.68 3.98 acres 3.68 3.98 acres Forested 0- 0 acres 0 n acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 0 acres 0 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0.02 0.32 acres 0.02 0.32 acres Water Surface Area 0 - 0 acres 0 0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 0 acres 0 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 0 acres 0 0 acres Other (Indicate type) 0 0 acres 0 0 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? please note test hole data a. Soil drainage: ®Well drained 100 % of Site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes MNo a. What is depth to bedrock? —600— (in feet) 2 14-16.2 (2/87)-7c 617.21 I SEAR Appendix A - State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOAVC 17 1Q1Q0 Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate-or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information,`and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 5. Approximate percentage of proposed proj ;ite with slopes: ®0-10% 100 Ell 0-15% % ' 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes ®No CI. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes ®No 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) * test hole dug to 16 ' without finding water 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? LIYes ONo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [@Yes ❑No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes LNNo According to J.M.O. Consulting Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ®Yes ONo Describe Bluffs along Fishers Island Sound 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes K]No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes ❑No unknown 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds,-wetland areas within or contiguous to.project area: a. Name unnnmp(i b. Size (In acres) less than 2 acre 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? 6]Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? MYes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []Yes ®No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes K]No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ®Yes ❑No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes R]No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 13.7 acres. (lots!l and 3 b. Project acreage .to be developed: 0.16/0.14 acres initially; 0.16/0 3 4 acres ultimately.respectively) C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 3.54/4.16 acres.(lots 1 and 3 respectively) d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: (each lot) One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially _ one \ Ultimately one i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ' ' height; 70'/70' width;105'/90'leng'length.respectively) 1 and 3 j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? _0 ft. 3 2. How much natural Oerial (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be remo`vc-d from the site? 0 tons/cub* : yarclls, 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Dyes ❑No ®N/A a. If yes, for what intender: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0.14/0.16 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation e removed3brespectively) ethis prof ctt?�) ❑Yes ®No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ❑No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes I#INo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 20 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes GC]No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ®No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? LNYes ❑No Type sewage 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ®No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes MNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ®Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month 0.35 tons / house b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ®Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name . Town landfill ; location N/A d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes X]No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ]Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 0 .35 tons/month. .b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? unknown years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes R]No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes ®No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes LINo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? CXYes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) home heating oil & electrical 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day unknown gallons/day. f` 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes ®No If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes MNo City, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ❑No subdivision approval 3/90 City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ®No City, County Health Department NYes ❑No Article 6 unknown Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ®No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ®No State Agencies nYes ❑No N.Y.S.D.E.C. Article 24 & 25 6/90 Federal Agencies ❑Yes ®No T C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? MYes []No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit 10subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-80 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 5 single family residences. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? same 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? MYes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? single family residential; Zone R-80 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? ®Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? three a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 3.7± acres 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes K]No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? [%Yes ❑No indirectly by increasing density of site to three single— family residences from one a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? NYes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes nNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? El Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Nam John S1, Guest and Margaret H. Guest Date December 14, 1990 Signature B ,C,, Sf� Title Authorized Agent Stephen L. Ham, III If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 't 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND IEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Impact Impact Project Change ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ El Yes No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ El Yes []No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ El Yes El No 2. Will there be an effect t.. ...,y unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO DYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 6 • 1 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15,24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ❑NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ El Yes El No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ El Yes El No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ❑NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not El 0 Oyes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No day. • Proposed Action will likely case siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to naturai conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 7Moderate FLarge 3all toCan Impact tieMitigated BypactProject Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ C • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑Yes []No Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes []No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ hour. ❑ []Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ refuse per hour. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ' • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ' heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ❑ El Yes El No • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ to industrial use. ❑ El Yes ❑No , • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No , IMPACT ON,PLANTS AND ANIMALS $- Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered r species? Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO. DYES ' Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ' Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ' Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other El El Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. ❑ ❑ El Yes El No ' Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No � Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ❑ Dyes El Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No �^ vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES �. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO OYES The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action.would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT,ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO ❑YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land- uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register, of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO OYES The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ El Yes No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 IMPACT ON-TRANSPORTATION 1 2 3 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO OYES Impact Impact Project Change • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ •.Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems . El ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No = • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ Y� transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family El Yes ONO 3, residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. - • Other impacts: a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. El ❑ Dyes ❑No • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ • El ❑No Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ noise screen. ❑ Dyes ❑No Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of ❑ ❑Yes ❑No accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ��• form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, ❑ []Yes ❑No infectious, etc.) i Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ gas or other flammable liquids. ❑ El Yes ❑No I Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑NO waste. j Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 10 i • 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than'5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects._ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ❑NO ❑YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 ,14-14-11 (2.`97)-9c 617.21 is SEAR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAE Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-'/a '/a-'/z 1/2-3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel. of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ �f natural features? `1 • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes ❑No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *'/a mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ El Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *1/2 mile El Yes El No *1 miles ❑Yes ❑No *2 miles El Yes ❑No *3 miles ❑Yes ❑No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number bf viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 MATTHEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW /! 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 STEPHEN L.BAM,in December 3, 1990 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attn. : Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; (SCTM # 1000 - 6 - 1 - 5) Dear Melissa: In accordance with our telephone conversation earlier today, I have enclosed ten prints of a revised minor subdivision map for -John and Margaret Guest. Please see that this matter is placed on your calendar for sketch plan approval as soon as possible. Sincerely, t�2 Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja _s - - Enclosures s, DEC 4Ig9Q )I r' ��yrrt71,i-c ` 1 TRUSTEES «a i. c>:; ," SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III, President O z Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. P.O. Box 1 179 John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 November 19, 1990 Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting P.O. Box 447 Quogue, NY 11959 RE: John Guest, Fishers Island SCTM #1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Just: The Trustees reviewed your application submitted by Glenn Just on behalf of John Guest to construct a house on lot #1 and one on lot #2. After an on site inspection by the Board of Trustees, it was determined that this project is out of Trustees' jurisdiction. All other approvals that may be applicable should be secured prior to the commencement of the project. Very truly yours, �Take -6 sAwws VeSt'cc�i�, John M. Bredemeyer, III ,,o;-VQ„A -tom too` President, Board of Trustees 1(20� suoZve y�r �.yo� s�bm•`}� JMB: j t l'eU I S-e cc: CAC Planning Board Bldg. Dept. File -4t!�'t6:iP•`'1e:At�r.�.v.d.=SFii.`1.__....:•s.�, r•il.�.u.rw+.°Sms�-c"1?..w.::. F,"v-..:, l.nc..+,�.5. Mr....:xx.4c_ ......-e...L. ,:..y+i=> .� n!cti4..v++lAyz..4'rw�^k.,d.r+e.c.�bt.a. '<{..a'S.c�:�':k1',CE.,'ri�r...�..+?:Ci�s ,9�. KK 7 TRUSTEES y ra SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor John M. Bredemeyer, III, President O `�` Su p Henry P. Smith, Vice President ��+,�� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski, Jr. d P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 November 19, 1990 Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting P.O. Box 447 Quogue, NY 11959 RE: John Guest, Fishers Island SCTM #1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Just: The Trustees reviewed your application submitted by Glenn Just on behalf of John Guest to construct a house on lot #1 and one on lot #2. After an on site inspection by the Board of Trustees, it was determined that this project is out of Trustees ' jurisdiction. All other approvals that may be applicable should be secured prior to the commencement of the project. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jt cc: CAC Planning Board Bldg. Dept. File Nov 1 9 11SO UFFO -61 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Telephone 0 . (516) 765-1801 Southold, New York 11971 F SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Planning Board From: Southold Town_ Conservation Advisory. Council Dated: August 21, 1990 Re: John Guest - Fishers Island SCTM #1000-6-1-5 The Conservation Advisory Council makes the following recommendation: The site appears to have no wetlands involved. X] The wetlands sited on the map appear to be correct. Map dated December .4, 1990 Wetland appear to be involved. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Southold Town Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary. The survey is not correct. Wetlands need to be staked by the Southold Town Trustees. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary Additional Comments: AUG 2I Ig90 `v. cc: Southold Town Board of Trustees ® ".SAS - �, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS s� SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �lwlip Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ® `� Richard G. Ward '1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: _ John Holzapfel,- Chairman Conservation Advisory Committee- FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. D (J� 5 Chairman DATE: May 8, 1990 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for John Guest Fishers Island SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Map dated December 4, 1989 In conformance with the new procedure that the Planning Board forward all referrals to the C.A.C: rather than the Trustees, we are sending you the above mentioned subdivision map for review. This map has not received any approvals at this stage. Please indicate whether you agree with the applicant's delineation of the wetland as shown on the enclosed map. Thank you in advance for your assistance. cc: John M. Bredemeyer. Ill, President Board of Trustees MATTHEWS & HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 STEPHEN L.HAM,III June 4, 1990 Planing Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attn. : Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; (SCTM # 1000 - 6 - 1 - 5) Dear Melissa: In connection with the referenced Minor Subdivision application and in accordance with the request contained in the Planning Board's letter to me of May 8, 1990, I have enclosed an original executed letter of authorization in which the Guests have authorized me to act on their behalf with respect to such application. Sincerely, `,�V2 Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja Enclosure .SUN - 5 1990 John S. Guest Margaret H. Guest 839 Weed Street New Canaan, CT 06840 May 2.6, 1990 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of Premises at Fishers Island, New York (SCTM # 1000 - 6 - 1 - 5) Dear Sirs: Please be advised that Stephen L. Ham, III of Matthews & Ham, 45 Hampton Road, Southampton, New York, is authorized to act as our agent concerning all matters relating to the referenced minor subdivision of our property at Fishers Island, New York. We further ratify and confirm the execution by him of all documents and the taking by him of all actions on our behalf to date in connection with our application for minor subdivision approval. Very truly yours, )&, S Jo n S. Guest Margare H. Guests r JUN - 5 1990 S�A Sib. R MATTHEWS & HAM K E MCI ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW „15 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 STEPHEN L.HAM,ra May 21, 1990 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attn. : Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5) Dear Melissa: In accordance with the Planning Board's letter to me of May 8, 1990, I have enclosed twelve prints of the proposed Minor Subdivision reflecting the changes and additions requested. Also enclosed are descriptions of the perimeter of the property and of the proposed individual lots. I will forward an authorization for me to act for the Guests in due course. .Please advise me immediately if any further information or documentation is required before the Planning Board may proceed with its review. Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:j a � - . ..`VIF Ll _..._1I'/- Enclosures _ _- = WAY 2 2 19,90 r DESCRIPTION OF THE ENTIRE GUEST SUBDIVISION A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon , located at Fishers' Ilsland , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue , said point being located 6594 . 56 feet North of a point which is 3449 . 90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees , 36 minutes and 00 seconds We-st 58 . 14 feet along said avenue line to a monument ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West ' 648 . 46 feet along the said Westerl.y line of Crescent Avenue to a monument ; thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 492'. 94'�feet to a pointy thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West about 339 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound, thence following the meanders of said high water line in a general Northwesterly and Northeasterly direction about 1980 feet to a point ; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the point of beginning . The above described tract is subject to a right of way 25 . 00 feet in width , irr favor of land now or formerly of Thomas W . Russell , Jr . which adjoins the above described tract on the South , said right of way being described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North - of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229 . 70 feet to a point ; thence South 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 01 second West 103 . 88 feet to a point ; thence South 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds West 132 . 00 feet to a point ; thence South 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds East 86 . 09 feet to a monument ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 mi`nutes and 01' second West 25 . 76 feet to a point ; thence North 29 degree's' , 52 minutes and 00 seconds West 87 . 96 feet to a point ; thence North '05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds East 148 . 06 feet to a point,; thence North 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 00 seconds East 98 . 41- feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 222 . 90 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees, 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . Together with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . Icn i JOHN S . GUEST AND MARGARET H . GUEST TO ( LOT #1 ) A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 492 . 94 feet to a point ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West 329 . 34 feet to a monument ; thence continuing South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second West about 10 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northwesterly about 480 feet along said high water line to a point ; thence South 84 degrees , 59 minutes and 33 seconds East 350 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 142 . 56 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the point of beginning . Containing 3 . 7 acres , more or less . Together with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United. States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point,; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . The above described tract is subject to a right of way 25 . 00 feet in width , in favor of land now or formerly of Thomas W . Russell , Jr . which adjoins the above described tract on the South , said right of way being described as follows : Beginning at the point of beginning of the above described tract and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229 . 70 feet to a point ; thence South 41 degrees , 03 ' minutes and 01 second West 103 . 88 feet to a point ; thence South 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds West 132 . 00 feet to a point ; thence South 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 seconds East 86 . 09 feet to a monument ; thence South 74 degrees , 20 minutes and 01 second bdest -25� a point ; thence North 29 degrees , 52 minutes and 00 se,cgkondsJ'- s_t+. 87 . 96 feet to a point ; thence North 05 degrees , 53 minutes and 00 seconds East 148 . 06 feet to a point ; thence North 41 degrees , 03 minutes and 00 seconds East 98 . 41 feet to a point ; thence North 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds West 222 . 90 feet to a point ; thence North 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds East 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25 . 04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 25 . 00 feet along said avenue line to the point of beginning . Subject also to a right of way , for all purposes , in favor of the owners of Lot #2 over the existing driveway which crosses the above described tract running in a Southwesterly direction from the Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue . r' 3 T JOHN S . GUEST AND MARGARET H . GUEST TO ( LOT #2) A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon , located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue , said point being located 6240 . 25 feet North of a point which is 3596 . 71 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 263 . 46 feet along said avenue line to a point ; thence North 75 degrees , 04 minutes and 02 seconds West 25 . 04 feet to a point ; thence South 14 degrees . 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 31 . 69 feet to a point ; thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 55 seconds East 142 . 56 feet to a point ; thence North 84 degrees , 59 minutes and 33 seconds West 350 . 00 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northwesterly and Northeasterly about 810 feet along said high water line to a point ; thence South 18 degrees , 35 minutes and 17 seconds East about 240 feet to a point ; thence South 75 degrees , 41 minutes and 56 seconds East 360 . 00 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue and the point of beginning . Containing 5 . 7 acres , more or less . Together with a right of way for all purposes over the existing driveway which crosses Lot #1 . Together also with a right of way across land of James V . Righter , said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows : Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 5960 . 73 feet North of a point which is 3667 . 96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees , 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50 . 13 feet to a point ; thence North 78 degrees , 26 minutes and 00 seconds East 60 . 56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue ; thence North 63 degrees , 29 minutes and 56 seconds West 81 . 47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning . } ii S.T.......! .N_D......_M A.R G ARE T......_H.............G_Q E S.T...._7_G._.................(L.0.T..._.13.) A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island , Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York , being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue , said monument being located 6594 . 56 feet North of a point which is 3449 . 90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees , 36 minutes and 00 seconds West 58 . 14 feet along said avenue line to a monument ; thence South 14 degrees , 18 minutes and 00 seconds West 360 . 00 feet along the Westerly line of said Crescent Avenue to a point ; thence North 75 degrees , 41 minutes and 56 seconds West 360 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 18 degrees , 35 minutes and 17 seconds West about 240 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound ; thence Northeasterly about 690 feet following the meanders of said high water line to a point ; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the point of beginning . Containing 4 . 3 acres , more or less . r ;f Obt, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ' ' ; ' SCOTT L. HARRIS �. ���. Supervisor Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman q� � George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward `= Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING. BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: _ John Holzapfel,- Chairman Conservation Advisory Committee FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. U S. Chairman DATE: May 8, 1990 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for John Guest Fishers Island SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Map dated December 4, 1989 In conformance with the new procedure that the Planning Board forward all referrals to the C.A.C. rather than the Trustees, we are sending you the above mentioned subdivision map for review. This map has not received any approvals at this stage. Please indicate whether you agree with the applicant's delineation of the wetland as shown on the enclosed map. Thank you in advance for your assistance. cc: John M. Bredemeyer III, President Board of Trustees L � u PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ICU; � � �• �7i"' SCOTT L. HARRIS W ': "` Supervisor Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman � --. ��' George Ritchie Latham, Jr. � a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823, May 8, 1990 Stephen L. Ham, III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The Planning Board reviewed the maps for 'the above mentioned subdivision that were dated December 4, 1989. The Board requests the following changes or information: 1. Lot #1 should be designed as a flag lot with access onto Crescent Avenue. 2. A one hundred (100' ) foot setback from the bluff must be shown on Lot #1. It is currently shown as a seventy five (751 ) foot setback. A one hundred foot setback is shown for Lot #3. 3. The well that currently services the existing dwelling on Lot #2 is shown on the proposed house site for Lot 43 . Although it is noted on the map that all proposed lots are to be serviced by municipal water, the Board would like to know what will happen to this well. 4. There is a discrepancy between the property description submitted and the metes and bounds shown on the map. Please correct the error. 5. Please submit authorization for you to act as agent for the applicant. The Board has referred a copy of this subdivision map to the Conservation Advisory Council (CAC) for review of the boundary of the wetlands. Upon submission of the above mentioned items, and upon receipt of comments from the CAC, the Board will proceed with their review. In addition, it was noticed upon inspection of the site that a large oak tree exists near the proposed house on Lot #1. The Board suggests that this tree be saved,if possible. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman 1 & 'J[.E ' �15 MATTHEWS HAM ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 STEPHEN L.HAM.III March 21, 1990 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest, his wife; SCTM # 1000-6-1-5 Dear Sirs: In connection with the referenced minor subdivision of premises at Fishers Island, I have enclosed the following: 1. Application for Approval of Plat, together with copy of deed. 2 . Questionnaire, together with copy of Certificate of Occupancy for existing structures. 3. Letter re grading, roads, etc. 4 . Part I of Short Environmental Assessment Form. 5. Check to the Town of Southold in the amount of $2 , 500 issued by John S. Guest. 6. Twelve prints of• a survey showing the existing and proposed lots. Please advise me immediately if any further information or documentation is required before you can commence the review process for this application. Very truly yours, Step .en L. Ham, III SLH:ja Enclosures ,S Pb MATTHEWS & HAX ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON,N.Y.11968 516-283-2400 PHILIP B.MATTHEWS TELECOPIER 516-287-1076 STEPHEN L.HAM,III March 21, 1990 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest, his wife; SCTM # 1000-6-1-5 Dear Sirs: In connection with the referenced minor subdivision of premises at Fishers Island, I have enclosed the following: 1. Application for Approval of Plat, together with copy of deed. 2 . Questionnaire, together with copy of Certificate of Occupancy for existing structures. 3 . Letter re grading, roads, etc. 4. Part I of Short Environmental Assessment Form. 5. Check to the Town of Southold in the amount of $2,500 issued by John S. Guest. 6. Twelve prints of a survey showing the existing and proposed lots. Please advise me immediately if any further information or documentation is required before you can commence the review process for this application. Very truly yours, -4r4,,e,,-- Tw Stephen L. Ham,, III - S LH:j a Enclosures y � -19�J �l March 2�, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of John S . Guest and Gentlemen: Margaret 11. Guest The following statements are offered for your consideration d in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No .new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads . (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, Stepherl L. Ham, III , as attorney for. John S . Guest and Margaret H. Guest ` q9Q i ThIS tiIINOR SUBDIV S ON IS FOR 3LOTS ON �3� ACRES LOCATED ON, C� Sea �e. �N Pi's� e2s SCTM# 1000- MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) . Complete applicat4on received mates bos J J�a 9 U 1L pK Application reviewed at work session A L OK I"Ffl. Applicant advised of necessary revisions \ D Revised submission received Ja "!. !?I b IFB` Sketch plan approval- -with conditions glZZ 9y .7.- �° illly(�1y , •� tp s13a195 III23�1.—�oba•1')"'` lod—`�.—%/ i /z^ryw 9j �M Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination a- -9r 6/+ f ,, j Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewell location Notification to applicant to include on final map �- 71 Sent to County Planning Commission �''F-0 J. a« i jWro [OK Receipt of County Report �gi i Review of SCPC report �,�-fir w a _ n ■ ■ Draft Covenants and Restrictions received = I"► ®K ■ Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed I cK 1 Filed Covenants and Restrictions received ����h i Receipt of mylars and paper prints with srti��S Health approval i i Final Public Hearing dz 4))e ys _ Approval'of*subdivision - -with conditions _ Endorsement of subdivision l0 5 'f1S 1�i//yU lllf�l l�© �`V fC CgOA - ctsof eC�- OL* J T(uStZeS' �Vric�yi i I \ � -- - '1 �, `� APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: attorney for the 1. The applicant is the/owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . .MiIIox..Subd�vision of John S : Guest.: a�d.. ag�x.�i^..H.•. .Guest., .his wife. .. .. ...... .. .. .... .... .. ................... ..... . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows Liber . .6295... . ........ . . .. . Pare 545. .. On Jaxtuaxy.. 29.,. . 1968 Liber . .... ...... .......... ... Page On Liber . ...... .... ...... .. . . .. . Page . . On Liber . .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .... .. . Page . .. .. . On , Liber . ........ .. .. .......... . Page . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . On , as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. ... . oras distributee . ...... .... .. ...... .... . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . .. ......... ..... .... . 5. The area of the land is . .. ..13: ±. ..... acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the (late hereof have been paid.m=ptxx•.•..•. . . . / . . ... .. .... . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. ... .......... . . . 7. The land is encumbered by . .. .. .N/A mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. .. .. . . . . . . ..Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . in ori;itial amount f $. . . . . .. . . . . .. . unpaid amount $ . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Held by . . .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . address . . . ........ .. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . (b) Mort;a-c recorded in Liber . .. .. .. . . Pane .t j am` $� c �;i"`}:7 �in ori-inal amount unpaid amount $. .. . . . . . . .. .. . .a le by b . .... .. .. .. . . . address . .. .. .. . . .. ..... . LLm ' 411k Z 3 190. . . .. . . .. .... . . .. . . . . ... ... r , . (c) illortgage recorded in Liber Pane a • • . •• • .•• .. ... . . in original amount Of unpaid amount $. .. ... . .::. .. .. . . .. .. . held by . .. ...... ......... . . .. ... ...... .... ...... ... address 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land.kx9ot . , , ,, ,,, . . . .. .. .. .... .... .. ...e..... ............ 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts . .. .. ... . .R-80 ... .. ...... .. .. .. ... ... . .. .. .. .. . . .... .. ........... . ........... 10. No part of the land lies under water whether title water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept yetlands flagged as noted on map submitted herewith - . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... . . ... .. .... . .... . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvertlents. 12. The land (does) ((lo=m{)-lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . .. .F.iS.bP•x$; .I.EiIand, 13. Water mains will be laid by . . N/A „(existing) and (a) (clo) charge will be lllade for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines acid standards will be installed by .�T/A„(existing) lines. and (a) (no) charge ��ill be made for installing said 15. Gas mains will be installed by . .N/A and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be e\istin� public streets in the Suffolk County IIighway -Ystclll, anlle\ Schedule "L'" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets Shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be c\isting public streets ill the Town of Southold .l Iiglll�ay system, aline\ Schedule "C" hereto to shop' same. 1S. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land %%_hick ue not located and shown Oil the plat. 19. �Vhcrc the plat sleto proposed streets ".1"ch are c\tcllsions of streets cm adjoinill- sub- dn ision maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said ixistill� leaps at their conjunctions «•ith the propusecl streets. 20. In the course of these procecdillgs, file applicantnit:er-.-larcrGE—�iF"ti-tle.� j asUjrcuircd by Sec. 33� of the Kcal Property Law: 21. S::hlait a copy of proposed (Iced for lots _Ilcm;in all I!I Schedule 14gstr.lctir�ns, coy c 13t:Cls, etc. Annex II 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $. •• • ... . as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at •,, ... . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". John S . Guest and DATE ..........Marcb....1-� ....•. 19. 90 Margaret H. Guest: his wife (Name of Applicant) By . .. ... . ...`.... .. ..Lam. .. .. (Signature a Title)Stephen L. Ham, I I•dd I , 45 Hampton Road as attorney Soutbamp.ton,.N�u�,York .11968........ (Address) Y STATE OF \TEW YORK, COUNTY OF . .... .. . . .SUFFOLK ss: On the ... ... /5 r.... . day of. .. .... .March. . ... .. .. .. .. 0 199. • . ., before me personally came Stephen ... Ham, III • . , . , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . .. .. . .. . executed the satne. . � t.JANE ALLEN NotaryGP'ublic �btARYPUYLIG,vials 6elew'Yo*ri No.52•491586 Qualified in Suffolk Countj g� Goatmission Expires Rf:c��mber 7f?, 19� STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF, . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .... .. .. .... . ss: On the . .. .. . . . . .. .. .. . day . .. .. . . .. ... of . .. . . .. .. .. .. .1 19. .. .. .. before me personally came • • • • •• •••.. . . .. ... . ... . to me known, who being by me duly sworn (lid de- pose and say that . .... .. .. .. . resides at No. . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. ... ..... . . . . ..... ... . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . that is the . .. .. .. .. . of . . . .. . .. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . the corporation described in and which executed the fol-c oinur instrument; that . .. .. . . . . . . . knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said-corporation. :cr;(l that ., . . . signed . .. . . .. . ... .. . name thereto by like order. \Totar Public .;'.�i.. I . ... . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . ... i 14.16.4(2/871—Text 12 _ PROJECT I-D,NUMBER 617.21 SE Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 1. A S . Guest and Mar aret H. Guest 2. PROJECTNAMEMt an Margaret H. O John S . Guest and Margaret H. Guest 3. PROJECT LOCATION: MunlclpalltyTown of Southold (Fishers Island)county Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road intersections,prominent landmarks,etc.,or provide map) Crescent Avenue , Fishers Island , New York (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: ®New ❑Expansion ❑Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Minor subdivision of 13 . 7± acre parcel into three lots of 3 . 6± acres , 5 . 8± acres and 4 . 3± acres 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially _ 1 7+ acres Ultimately 13 • 7± 8. WILL PROPcres OSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LANDUSE RESTRICTIONS? ®Yes ❑No If No,describe briefly C9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ®Residential ❑Industrial ❑Commercial Describe: ❑Agriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open space Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL STATE OR LOCAL)? IN Yes ❑No If yes,list agency(s)and permit/a pprovals Suffolk County Department of Health Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACT:C:N HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑Yes ®No If yes,list agency name and permitlapproval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes ®No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/spongor name: John S . Guest and Margaret H. Guest `' - , , Signature: L 4:7 Stephen L. Ham III' ,a.5_. Sttorney If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agen.cy `comp=theCoastal Assessment Form before roceedin with this asses.s.me------------------ p 9 �'crOVER 1 L r PLA�fNI LB ^a TO '0. SOU ,HOLD SL FOB K1CO3JV TY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms . If your answer- to any of the following questions is yes , please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence: 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes No (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? Yes No 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes No 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency? (Town , State, County, etc. ) Yes No 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? i " Yes No �I V"! 6. Was this property the subject o'f-'apy prior application to the Planning Board? if = ' Yes No 7. Does this property have a validolcertificat(� Of occupancy, if yes please submit..a, copy "Ovi:same Yes No I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied on by the Plannin Board in considerin this pplication. John S . Guest angel Margaret H. Guest , iis wife B e . /ya�,,,. 1�- 3/ 2/ /9 0 Signatur of roperty owner or authorized agent date Stephen L. Ham, III , as attorney i Attachment to questionnaire for:.-the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: ' On the a15t day of March 1990, before me personally came_ Stephen L. Ham, III to me known to be the individual described in-- and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. JANE ALLEN Qiyre_4� PSOTARY PUBLIC,Mate of Yew YoA No&,dry Public "U- 4'�IV '05 Qua V;ad in;:Mfdi County Commission Fxrpires Oecgrnber 26, 19Z9 r/ it 1 f FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Clerk's Office Southold, N. Y. Certificate Of Occupancy No. /610.0. . . . . . . Date . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ept. . .11. . . . . ., 19.%4. THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at- VT-.. •:;v§greet Map No. . ., . . , . . . Block No. .� . . . .Lot No. . rlorth sh e 1 ^i rs -1 sia.nd } conforms substantially, to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. . . . . . . ., 197 p. . pursuant to which Building Permit No. dated . . . . . . . . . . . .I)ec . . . . . . .. 1970 ., was issued, and conforms to all of the require- ments of the applicable provisions of the law..The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is . Private .ona Xani.ly. dzreli.ing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The certificate is issued tgohn. . . Guest• • • • • • • •0t,rner (owner, lessee or tenant) • of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval Fen,dig. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE Noel. 179401 . . . .Aug. . .2 . . .1971� . , . HOUSE NUMBER . . .none . . . . . Street . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Building Inspector „� 2 3 1��p Standard N.Y.B.T.U.Form 8006•9-66-5M—Ua -- and-S.le Dved,'withour Covenant against Grantor's Am--' idual or 5 LER CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS-INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY. THIS INDENTURE, made the 2-41 day of January , nineteen hundred and,siXty-e ghti�� BETWEEN ESTATE OF LEON I. ROSS, WILLIAM H. MULLIGAN7 Receiver �41A (William H. Mulligan having been so appointed pursuaA to an order � � dated February 17, 1965 of the United States District Court for the \ Southern District of New York in a proceeding entitled "United States. of America v. Leon I. Ross, Ross and Company, Limited, and Central Trading, Inc. , (61 Civ. 2308)" party of the first part, and JOHN S. GUEST and MARGARET H. GUEST, his wife, both residing at 839 Weed' Street , New Canaan, Connecticut, party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of TEN and 00/100 ($10.00) ---------------------------------------------- dollars, lawful money of the United States, paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or . successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in the at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, more specifically bounded and described- as follows:- BEGINNING at a concrete monument set at an angle of Crescent Avenue, which monument is set North 6589. 09 feet and West 3507.78 feet of the U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence from said point of beginning South 14 degrees 18 minutes 00 sec-onds West , along the westerly line or side of Crescent Avenue, . 8.4�feet; RUNNING THENCE South 15 degrees 39 minutes�'S seconds East, along lands now or formerly of H. Walsh and bounded easterly by said lands , 663 .00 feet to. a concrete monument; RUNNING THENCE South 15 degrees 39 minutes 55 seconds East, still along said lands of Walsh 10 feet more or less to the mean high water mark of Long Island Sound; RUNNING THENCE westerly, northerly and northeasterly along the mean high water mark of Long Island Sound as it winds and turns 2530 feet more or less to lands of one Wyckoff; RUNNING THENCE due South, along said lands of Wyckoff and bounded easterly by said lands :338 feet more or less to the northerly line or side of Crescent Avenue, and; RUNNING THENCE South 84 degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds West , 58 .14 feet to the monument set at the point or place of Beginning, and containing 15. 45 acres, more or less. Said premises are intended to be the same premises conveyed to Leon I. Ross by the United States Government by quitclaim deed dated April 9 , 1948 , exclusive of the- 2.88 acres thereafter conveyed by. Leon I. Ross - to .;oo Wyck'o-ff. Description Continued on Rider of Tbr.eegdT,4 ges Attached ^< L L _ter Description of Premises (Continued) ALSO a .right of -passway, including the right to grade for and to construct a roadway upon this right of way and also the right to lay and maintain conduits for electric wire, pipes for water supply and drains and to erect poles for electric wires over a strip of land 50 feet wide, ex- tending from the end of the public highway (Crescent Avenue) to and along the land above described. The passway is described as follows : COMMENCING at a point in the Westerly line of land of Benjamin Hall, said point being in the southerly line of the public highway, and at the westerly end of said public _, highway, thence North Eighty-five degrees, Thirty minutes, Thirty seconds West (N. 850 iOt 30" W. ) Four hundred ninety- three and four tenths (493 .2 , feet to a stone monument set in the ground; thence North Seventy degrees, Fifty-five minutes five seconds West (N. 700 55 ' 05" -W. ) One hundred ninety-seven (197) feet to -a stone monument set in the ground; thence South Seventy-two degrees, Twenty-one minutes, forty- five seconds West (S . 219 45" W. ) Two hundred ninety-twoand five tenths (292:5�20 feet to a stone monument set in the ground. The above described line is the southerly line of a passway, the Northerly line is parallel thereto and Fifty (50) feet distant therefrom. Thence from the stone monument last above mentioned crossing the passway North Seventeen degrees Nineteen minutes, Forty-five seconds West (N. 170 19 , 45" W. ) Fifty (50) feet to a stone monument set in the ground, thence South Eighty-four degrees, Fifty-four minutes Thirty-five seconds West (840 54 ' 35" W.*) Two hundred i"lfty feet (250) feet to a stone monument set in the ground, thence North Sixteen degrees, Forty-nine minutes five seconds West (N. 160 49 ' S�� W. ) One hundred thirty-one and one tenth (131'.l) feet to a stone monument set in the ground, thence North five degrees, forty- . two minutes, thirty-five seconds East (N. 50 421 35" E. ) Four hundred ninety-nine and three tenths (499.3) feet to a stone monument set in the ground being the southeasterly corner of land now or formerly owned by Nellie A. Lincoln, thence North eighty-eight degrees, twenty-one minutes five seconds West (N. 880 211 05" W. ) in the Southerly line of land of said Lincoln, and the extension thereof Two hundred sixty-five and five tenths (265.5) feet to a stone monument set in the ground, thence South Eighty-four degrees, Thirty-four minutes Twenty seconds West (S. 840 341 20" W. ) Thirty-five feet to a corner of the land first above described, thence South Ei hty-four degrees, Thirty-four minutes, Twenty seconds West 840 34, 20"W. ) in the line of land first above described Two hundred ninety-one (291) . feet to a stone monument set in the ground, thence South Fourteen degrees, nineteen minutes, five seconds West (S . 140 191 0511 W. ) in the line of land first above des- cribed Six hundred forty-eight and eight tenths (648.8) feet to a stone monument set in the ground. The second course herein described is the Northerly line of the passway. The Southerly line is parallel thereto and 50 feet distant there- from. The thirdeand fourth courses herein described are the easterly line of the assway, the westerly line is parallel thereto and fifty (50� feet distant therefrom. The fifth sixth and seventh courses herein described are the northerly IsRMAN E M KLIP• P Suffolk CDunh4 line of the passway, the southerly line is parallel thereto and fifty (50) feet distant therefrom, the eighth and last course herein described is the westerly line of the passway, the easterly line is parallel thereto and fifty (50) feet distant therefrom. The bearings are true. The foregoing description is drawn from survey entitled "Land and right of way proposed purchase at North Hill, Fishers Island, N.Y. " made by U.S. Engineer Office, New London, - Conn. , Aug. 21, 1917. Together with all the. right.,.,t,itle .and.. interest of the party of the first part *of,' in and to the land and land under water adjoining the above-described premises below mean high watermark. Together with a valid easement for -a perpetual right of way and easement in common with others, 50 feet in width, for the purpose of ingress and egress in, through.,- over and upon land situated in Fishers Island, Town of Southold, - County of Suffolk and State of New York, said right of way being bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a drill hole in a stone monument set in the northwesterly line of Fox Avenue, so-called, said monu- ment being distant in an approximate westerly direction eight- five and thirty-four one hundredths (85.34) feet from a drill hole in a stone monument marking the intersection of the northeasterly side line of Mansion House Drive and the south- easterly side line of Fox Avenue, and. distant also in an approximately northwesterly direction fifty-two and nineteen one-hundredths (52.19) feet from a drill hole -in a stone monu- ment marking the- intersection of the southwesterly side line of Mansion House Drive and the southeasterly side line of Fox Avenue; thence running North sixteen degrees, forty-two minutes, thirty-nine seconds West (N. 160 42 ' 39" W. ) true, a distance of three hundred twenty-four and sixteen one-hundredths (324 .16) feet to a drill hole in a stone monument; thence turning and running North forty-four degrees thirty-nine minutes fourteen seconds West (N. 44" 39 ' 14" W. ) true, a distance of four hundred seventy-one and ninety-one one hundredths (471. 91) feet to a drill hole in a stone monument; thence turning and running North thirty-six degrees eight minutes forty-three seconds West (N. 360 081 43" W. ) true, a distance of four hundred forty- four and twenty-five one hundredths (444.25) feet to a drill hole in a stone monument; thence turning and running North . sixty-three degrees twenty-nine minutes fifty-six seconds West (N. 630 29 ' 56" W. ) true, a distance of three hundred sixty-five and no one hundredths (36.5. 00) feet to an unmarked point; thence turning and running south seventy-eight degrees twenty-six minutes and no seconds West (S. 780 26 ' 00" W. ) true a distance of eighty-one and � nd thirty-nine one hundredths (81-39) feet to a drill hole in a stone monument; this point also marks an angle point in the southeasterly boundary of the land at North Hill now or formerly owned by-,the United States of America;. thence turning and running - by the boundary of the said land, south -2- M. of Suffolk CDuntu �, r r ' f east fifteen degrees thirty-nine minutes fifty-five- secondsand thirteen one o " E. ) true, a distance of fiftpoint onthe boundary (S. 15 39 55 to arked p hundredths (50 .13) feet an unm owned by the United States of of said land now or formerly ei ht degrees America; thence turning and running N. 78 s 0 26, 00,, E. ) true , twenty-six minutes no seconds east (N distance of sixty and fifty-six, one hundredths feet (60: 56) a d ixt thence turning and running south sixty- to an unmarked point; six seconds East three degrees twenty-nine minutes fifty- S. 630 29 ; 56" E. ) a distance of three hundred thirty- ( true, g feet to .an five and fifty-eight one hundredths (335.58) unmarked point near a stone monumentl -thence turning and three south thirty-six degrees eight minutes forty- running 083n E. ) a distance of four seconds. East (S. 360. , true , thence hundred thirty-five and seventy-nine h point near. another feet to an unmarked p four degrees thirty-nine turning and running South forty-minutes fourteen seconds East (S. 440 39' 1411 E• ) true ,-. a distance of four hundred sixty-three and seventeen one feet to an unmarked point; thence turning hundredths (463.17) two minutes thirty-nine and running south sixteen degrees forty- 0 , 11 E. ) true, a distance of three seconds east (S. 16 42 3nine one hundredths (316.69) feet to hundred sixteen and sixty- side line of Fox Avenue an unmarked point on the northwesterly thence by said side line of Fox Avenue' north sixty- so-called;degrees three minutes five seconds Eallone7 seven degrees forty-_.. and twenty-fourThis tract 431 0511 E. ) true a distance of point ofbeginning. hundredths (50.2�) feet to the p owned of an ea of land represents within the lim�he landhenow roryformerly fifty 893 feet in width from Fox Avenue ° and contains about lProposed by the United States at North Hill, rk, Firs acres . Being - shown on planReservation,sEngineer office, Right of Way to North Hill l 41." Corps Area, dated September 24 , 9 rights; privileges, or TOGETHER WITH all other easements ,acquired by Leon I. Ross said appurtenances tOsaid premises em ses ' esofAmerica, whereby s certain deed from the premises were conveyed to Leon I. Ross. covenants., or SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to any and all easemenhowever, said covenants , reservations o nd reservations are valid,r restrictions (provided, in force and effect restrictions a of this deed) and enforceable on the date of the delivery to I . Ross from the United States co ntained in said deed of America. SU BJECT., further, to any and all easements heretoforelectricd over and along the above-described for the install�phation linesmaintenance of water ne10 feet .of lines or immediately adjacent to and within ten ( ) property Crescent Avenue where the same abuts the above-describe premises. r -3- M. NORMAN E. KLIPP II 6i"A Of Suffolk 1 ounhfr TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and i roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof, TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever.; the sale and conveyance of of the aforedescribed property having been authorized and confirmed by Order . Of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 'dated April 17, 19679 in the .aforeizentioned action # 61 Civ. 2308.. 4 ,} a - `' r ' t ?i a AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive sttch consid- . e rat ion as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word."party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE 0'F: Qc�US,t.�'+• +"` ES�IfAT�� �. `rcu5 nop�xT r .M� William H. Mulligan, no State N°w Notary Publi Y rya 60,_7838610 C ouatr Receiver Qualified in Wu0cttu;laz 150 Turta dxl,itos Idatctt :10, " t, ! CIO P. D Il JAN 2� 19 kORAfatr E jW n pP ff •. Mdj k� tr .. yediF;'+° StF� S�rwr t rw�.. �S4F.�, n d !"�.s' ",<r�^tri t�� ,"din•+s'n �' ,!. • ,ardf��nr -:. § Hy wh..Yctr � '!' 7A�' � ''r' � � n 0�t n•r »s �'t � STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ,', ' �' � �) ss: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF1. ss: j~On,khc- 24thday of January, 1968 re me On the day of 19 , before me personally came William H. Mulligan, V personally came 3 Receiver of the Estate of Leon I k Ross to me known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed tdie )oregoing instrument, and acknowledged that Pe executed the same, execut d the same. . / �+ ' •r• •off ., , ., 130BEAT P. MG Not Public, State of ew York - No. 80.7838810;' Quohfiei la Westchester Couatp Tw �xpireB Nnrch 30, 1968 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss: On the day of 119 , before-me On the day of 19 , before me. personally came personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with say that he resides at No. whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he is the of 'that he knows the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he to be the individual knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in .and who executed the foregoing instrument; to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw affixed by order of the board-of directors of said corpora- execute the same; and that he, said witness, tion, and that, he signed h name thereto by like order, at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. 39argain anb bale ;Deeb X. lam WITHOUT COV NAB AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS " �'� IX�X FISHERS ISLAND IrLE No. V� - MOXM K TOWN SOUTHOLD ESTATE OF LEON I. :ROSS., WILLIAM. H. MULLIGAN, RECEIVER TO s1.1t� 2 g 196�3 JOHNS. GUEST .and MARGARET H.. GUEST, Recorded At Request of The Title Guarantee Company ; RETURN BY MAIL TO: his wife. Cravath, Swaine & Moore, STANDARD FORM OF NEW YORK BOARD OF TITLE UNDERWRITERS 1 Chase Manhattan .Plaza, Diaribaled by New York, N. Y. 10005 THE TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY ' Attention of James P. Manning,Es . CHARTERED :883 @ IN NEW YORK zip No. 10005 4 9 _M 1.' . R E C 0 DED -, --= J _ M ' i�' : =�,�._ HORMAN E ar "L bLI . KLIPP z `" �:. I�leak 1�f'Suffolk 'Countlr ;y i - � St DEPT. OFWIN �" ,��-�Q��y�--ice•- �.J / - -- -'•,, \� G�cc�uG.�+-�G•i_--1-E=�. c,_L�--�!r- --a"u,6.-� -.�,�t-.( F,--�-� ' °. ., \`"' P�P a Jt 19rf'-���.d.F r� � /��' \�� � J•--1 G.l-,l z�. f`��� ---�---,�., ,c ,L- v�.-r7 c�,.� �r-�-n o r .! I= ": � �,-----:. 6= emu-' L 1� AV- _ "s. -a F�= 5 / /�//� � ,r 'yrM t I TUckc ' Jai \� ` ,-/ Y f i •� �• �7i - ,Ll.c�••,-tom' ., 24" DIA COVER ' - ,=- x� .t s9 ,• i` — /�i / lI I I d _-r T L L rcrt's t�>✓ ` 6 v \ -rau_ 41.C. 1 y'•••+ o ❑ 0 0 1-3c3 0 0 0 (4� 8" DIA KNOCKOUTS O r o a o 0 0 o ci ❑ o = ►11T5 OF CLEAIZtN a ❑ ❑ o Ga o o ❑ a _-_ _ / T I \`y/� \ I N +E 3 iC n ❑ Q o O o O ❑ a 4 (TO REMAIN) d _- -- -arc cv_ c, � �s : C7 / o `� ' 1 L ct.c r r Cam )—,r-=mot-4 4 , to �JLI T. �. ROF. tg OAK �/ // ! EXfSATE SEeE4Et1 - �/ / (7 � �t \ �'� a2= �_�^ Koss ec wrc 4„ 8,-0" DIA to ` \ r� r�; -1-`- 1 ✓ T �klt-4 t '" t ##r •.1 —� � � i PKctP�� �"�� � I4 i, ��Zi���,�6�-'�`y„i,•�SG"' .._.--— `—_:--� ,/� a� y �� A �: � \\ l,i SYSf^. �� o,®.-T.Y,•k 1 � \\\�.: �t Y` Y/' �� /� � aG b 'i � �•ti,,S � \ t� l�a..,.�, * ,,.�.,• • n� ^-- �p�1 N ns•S3'00•E N \\ "'j „ m ��06 grit l `� _,r�� �, �\ c° .--' / �- `�„ Va°p'tr.,"'t ' a '�"' i✓� ( � �a DRY WELL �� a`�.00 E �\ s3+� •N e°3 ��� c • .�3 .U.7�- / f �) a�i I 1 Q) Do. `*.�� ".►. _ z . ... TYPICAL SECTION �• �, �, 4, ,� F is� i � z� k� � � ��' :, i! � `�\ I FLAG� Q � NOT TO SCALE ( —�\ 9' q `\\ y 1q ...� �`• fir, /`` as�c A 'lOGICA ` ,\ . 01, 45 ' �u+c s \ 8 -6 Qc.�JJ.J�• Jc'IS Dt�I t�'Y- -- � �. 4 x 4 12,5/12.5 WIRE MESH �� s �• t' 6 x 6 6/6 WIRE MESH 7 vt3d �,_ �1• �•�I-ram �� l �---•.r -r" •.�.��`C'oc..u�..t C�>< <..�-rHc.�c....--�� G�'.r���-�E ...�- c,,X IL INLET - ' - VENT 25�4 L.c'�-!• !_-__—, _`j`c �r f lti s 00•'0 0�ao i�W 33e.a o. LIQUID LEVEL ct-r- ' ,c'�_ dr�ca Jc_)8a J 1`l T =. +-J :r• ,L1J� _ CONCRETE SAFFELs r� I --' •'. 1._1 IL _. CONTINUOUS HOT I --r'' ; eSe.l ,G ram_ ICJ ASPHALT SEAL : 8. �i���--;-t•c.�t� C.,�..i��.t_._ T c� v t ,+._..-" V4�IRE MESH S/�2.5 � > �� 4 f2 MINIMUM oa.l 8'--4" 1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK , r �T- CROSS SECTION - F51 PHOTO. # f DIRECTION NOT TO SCALE 4 Ll LINE DEARING DISTANCE 0 Vw4p 7.91= 2 S 14* 18'00"W 25.00 O Q Aj 54•--4-9. '5PC> 3 S 74'20'01 W 25.76 A31 .69 .� '�"f .L1 _E' rt'G�e �C�t�"��.-.1 �• t..�� j. (.PZA4:). Z•5 (J. ,359l.0.-1 ( 4 N 14' 18'00 'E C4 Al. 599d- '9G. W.. 3L �. r. 7e 0 �--: � -�"J .,aC....�-+�=�s T-- E--�-• C--�asE� N I--!s b-JjF=if • SUBJECT TO COVENANTS i REST&OCTIONS UBER PAGE �� � `T c� � . t - —ter c t rr- + t --�c , " ✓ --r�-rr��.s.-t---�--��0�1�r-r�JG-r•;c�u ��i.:r�6a��-��.L-� F �tcc. -te-•c�ts Z7,��"s---'. .a.•%�'F"�'�.,t._.S F-c»`..✓�'+�tG.t_.� �_.t i �' � '_ (f"�"'� �s l f(f.s t ,t-t c=1E-:--� 1"�c c� s t r - �+!`('4} T)SUFFOIX WPM rmflimi will OF mmdm SSW c,_1 �+��-r� 1 C.I-1 - `�•___;_-� � i!-1G�- ��• ad '1`I�M b Mrtr � �► f d�� -- _ij w4h t lahl 01 _. 4-e�' s, � �L l to 11�f ow In I d'!►�tIE �- , ,mot_ J � F7NtV r"M it�Iy 1 ' 1hi CONOY Ik �-�a C.�a Tt� �P C> C _t✓C li F ca,J s I L d.s l i � dMl agrwllt7wc!M( ►01viI1M ilA11Q of a d ,t-.lo C.J c_-r r� -Is=r� -I c, r `Tf c�-T--r-► r, �t.4.'c..j._ F-C.a � `� Fi• wMIfA WW1�AdDE11MIMK M ihp t�11klf t!N � r+.o► t .d�-t i u.a_ �vrs�J C� �•z ram,->✓n v t �'N tZ u c l '1 A��y�,�,iMi Ot 1h� Huh LMI►CIb1R •'r��-•���- !�i,,�-.,:..r�!•�Lo,_.r�E.c.��s T-� ��— "° � �_� I °•c' "®® � ADDi•TlpNS f REVISIONS` ?I SEPT 1992 .e�-- � -`stet ! C)�(f,=,uf«r�t-, WATER LINES Z FEB. I993 049 r`r , LPN H. . P4 ,L -F=�`G'T"Il 1Gm��{ Ti-Ft•s J`�JSy�tt.lt tca E-�d s5 521 �a PATH LOCATIONS 31 AUG. 1934 ffi v � T ,,Tt•►>.� ��l G Jam.. c)t•=`T+ �t~t=��s �S o 13v OtnotOt, OWN of �y ��..�,.�-;� �= lt�a�l`i�..�.�:' •,47! �` t ./ T � - __ ��..►r�E,� -Z t="V-�- k995 , , „�` • .,r Ll MAY 19 1,995y L??Cd"